alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 119.1 What is the Program for Investment in Microentrepreneurs (PRIME)? ( a ) The PRIME program authorizes SBA to award grants to qualified organizations to fund training and technical assistance for disadvantaged microentrepreneurs; training and capacity-building services for microenterprise development organizations; research and development of the best practices in the fields of microenterprise development and the provision of technical assistance to disadvantaged microentrepreneurs; and such other activities as the Agency deems appropriate.
( b ) Dependent upon the availability of funds and continuing program authority, SBA will issue, via *Grants.gov* or any successor platform, funding announcements specifying the terms, conditions, and evaluation criteria for each potential round of PRIME awards. These funding announcements will identify who is eligible to apply for PRIME awards; summarize the purposes for which the available funds may be used; advise potential applicants regarding the process for obtaining, completing, and submitting an application packet; and provide information regarding application deadlines and any additional limitations, special rules, procedures, and restrictions which SBA may deem advisable.
( c ) SBA will evaluate applications for PRIME awards in accordance with the stated statutory goals of the program and the specific criteria described in the relevant funding announcement.
( d ) In administering the PRIME program, SBA will require recipients to provide reports in accordance with the subject matter areas and schedule identified in the terms and conditions of their awards. In addition, SBA may, as it deems appropriate, make site visits to recipients' premises and review all applicable documentation and records.
[85 FR 62951, Oct. 6, 2020]
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5085 

To prohibit the government of the District of Columbia from using Federal 

funds to allow individuals who are not citizens of the United States 

to vote in any election, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2022 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the government of the District of Columbia from 

using Federal funds to allow individuals who are not 

citizens of the United States to vote in any election, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, no Federal funds made available to the Dis6 trict of Columbia may be used to allow individuals who 

7 are not citizens of the United States to vote in any elec8 tion. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5085 IS

1 (b) CERTIFICATION.—Upon application for, approval 

2 for, or receipt of any Federal funds, the government of 

3 the District of Columbia shall certify that the government 

4 does not permit individuals who are not citizens of the 

5 United States to vote in any election. 

6 (c) APPLICATION.—The requirements under this sec7 tion shall apply with respect to any Federal funds applied 

8 for, approved for, received by, or made available to the 

9 District of Columbia on or after the date on which this 

10 bill is introduced in the Senate. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41027 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JORGE BALLESTEROS-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CR-18-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 20, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Jorge Ballesteros-Rivera has filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ballesteros-Rivera has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record reveals no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7631

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CURTIS ANTHONY HAYNES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-95-353-A)

Submitted: March 30, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999

Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Anthony Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Stewart Dahl,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Haynes’ motions for stay, default judgment, and for remand

are denied.

2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Anthony Haynes appeals the district court’s order

denying Haynes’ motion for modification of his sentence. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court.* See United States v. Haynes, No. CR-95-353-A

(E.D. Va. Oct. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
### §511. Attorney General to advise the President

The Attorney General shall give his advice and opinion on questions of law when required by the President.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 612.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 303. | R.S. §354. |
| | | Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69, §1 (8th full par. on p. 241), 19 Stat. 241. |

Statutes at Large
EXHIBIT 18

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 1-21 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of 2

US 7319718 – Claim 15 3GPP Specifications

A method of coding information 

regarding a channel, comprising:

providing information bits of a0, a1, a2, 

a3, and a4;

encoding the information bits using a 

(20, 5) code; and

providing output code words of 20 bits 

as a result of the encoding step, wherein 

the (20, 5) code is a prescribed 

combination of 5 basis sequences Mi,n 

as defined as follows:

3GPP TS 25.212 v.6.7.0

4 Multiplexing, channel coding and interleaving

4.7 Coding for HS-DPCCH

4.7.1 Channel coding for HS-DPCCH

4.7.1.2 Channel coding for HS-DPCCH channel quality information

The channel quality information is coded using a (20,5) code. The code 

words of the (20,5) code are a linear combination of the 5 basis sequences 

denoted Mi,n defined in the table below.

Table 14: Basis sequences for (20,5) code

The CQI values 0 .. 30 as defined in [4] are converted from decimal to binary 

to map them to the channel quality information bits (1 0 0 0 0) to (1 1 1 1 1) 

respectively. The information bit pattern (0 0 0 0 0) shall not be used in this 

release. The channel quality information bits are a0 , a1 , a2 , a3 , a4 (where a0

is LSB and a4 is MSB). The output code word bits bi are given by:

 where i = 0, ..., 19.

US 7319718 – Claim 16 3GPP Specifications

The method of claim 15, wherein the 

output code word bits, bi are based on

3GPP TS 25.212 v.6.7.0

4.7.1.2 Channel coding for HS-DPCCH channel quality information

The output code word bits bi are given by:

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 1-21 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of 2

 where i = 0, ..., 19.

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 1-21 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 3 of 3
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsConcurrent Image Processing Executive (CIPE). Volume 1: Design overviewThe design and implementation of a Concurrent Image Processing Executive (CIPE), which is intended to become the support system software for a prototype high performance science analysis workstation are described. The target machine for this software is a JPL/Caltech Mark 3fp Hypercube hosted by either a MASSCOMP 5600 or a Sun-3, Sun-4 workstation; however, the design will accommodate other concurrent machines of similar architecture, i.e., local memory, multiple-instruction-multiple-data (MIMD) machines. The CIPE system provides both a multimode user interface and an applications programmer interface, and has been designed around four loosely coupled modules: user interface, host-resident executive, hypercube-resident executive, and application functions. The loose coupling between modules allows modification of a particular module without significantly affecting the other modules in the system. In order to enhance hypercube memory utilization and to allow expansion of image processing capabilities, a specialized program management method, incremental loading, was devised. To minimize data transfer between host and hypercube, a data management method which distributes, redistributes, and tracks data set information was implemented. The data management also allows data sharing among application programs. The CIPE software architecture provides a flexible environment for scientific analysis of complex remote sensing image data, such as planetary data and imaging spectrometry, utilizing state-of-the-art concurrent computation capabilities.Document ID19900019032Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLee, Meemong*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Groom, Steven L.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Mazer, Alan S.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Williams, Winifred I.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 15, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186853JPL-PUBL-88-32-REV-1-VOL-1NASA-CR-186853Accession Number90N28348Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900019032.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
November 14, 2018


 


 


Dear Mr. Patten,


 


We, the Board of Directors of
GrandSouth Bancorporation, are writing to today to formally request an 18- month delay in provision 4.3 of the Security Purchase
Agreement dated February 3, 2016 between GrandSouth Bancorporation (the “Company”) and Wellington Management Company
LLP. Included in provision 4.3 is a requirement that the Company become subject to the periodic reporting requirements of
Section 13 (by having its Common Stock registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act) or Section IS(d) of the Exchange Act.


 


Based on multiple conversations
with investors, investment advisors, and accounting firms, we believe this registration would be better timed at a later date,
when the Company has grown to a larger asset size and market capitalization. We have made great effort to grow the Company and
share price over the 32 months since Wellington Management Company LLP purchased shares in the Company. From the year ended December
31, 2015 to the quarter ended September 30, 2018, the total assets of the Company have grown 74% to $740.3 million. The share price
of our Company’s stock has grown to a current price of $18.00 from the $12.00 price at the time of issuance in February of
2016. Additionally, we upgraded to the OTCQX exchange in September of this year to provide additional liquidity to our shareholders.


 


The annual cost of registration
with the SEC is estimated to be between $400 thousand and $500 thousand, annually. This is a significant cost to our Company as
we continue to grow the franchise and expand strategically into new markets, and we do not see that there will be significant benefits
in share price or share liquidity should we make this next step within the next nine months. We request that this requirement be
delayed eighteen months to allow the Company to grow and register with the SEC when the benefits of this change will be greater.


 


We are committed to adding capital
and liquidity and are currently expecting to add $10 million in common equity with accredited individual investors in a capital
raise this quarter.


 


If you would like to meet to address
questions or would like additional information, please contact J. B. Garrett by telephone at (864) 527-7170 or by email at jb.garrett@grandsouth.com
.. Thank you for your time and consideration.


 


	Sincerely,	 
	Mason Y. Garrett	JB Schwiers	Michael L. Gault
	S Hunter Howard, Jr.	John W. Shealy	J. B. Garrett
	
        Anthony W. Morgan

        Edward M. Rast
	
        J. Calhoun Pruitt

        Harold E. Garrett
	Baety O. Gross


 


381 Halton Road |
PO Box 6548 | Greenville, SC 29607 |
Phone 864-770-1000
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the amended annual report of Fellows Energy Ltd. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George
      S. Young, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Fellows Energy Ltd. and will be retained by Fellows Energy Ltd. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date:
                  February 13, 2006
              By:*/s/ GEORGE S. YOUNG*George
                  S. YoungChief
                  Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 135622 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 135622 COA: 281345 Genesee CC: 05-016221-FC EDGAR ALEJANDRO DELEON-PUENTES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 28, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
EXHIBIT 6

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 1 of 3
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO: 2020-007685-CA-01

SECTION: CA44

JUDGE: William Thomas

COOPERATIEVE RABOBANK U.A,. NEW YORK BRANCH et al

Plaintiff(s)

vs.

EISNERAMPER LLP

Defendant(s)

____________________________/

MANDATORY ORDER TO CONFER AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT

This case is subject to the Complex Business Litigation Rules. The rules require that parties meet and

confer prior to filing any motion to determine if issues can be narrowed, the appropriate amount of time

required for hearing if hearing is requested, and any other issues such as the completion of related

discovery. Meet and Confer under these rules requires an actual effort between attorneys, not staff. 

 

It is therefore: ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

 All parties to a motion must meet the conferral requirements of the division. The motion must

contain a certification of the efforts at meet and confer, which shall include:

A description of all efforts at a meet and confer, including names of movant and respondent

attorneys, dates and method (email, telephone, live meeting) requesting a meet and confer;

and

●

A description of all dates for meet and confer actually held and the method and names of

participating attorneys; and

●

Results achieved, including consensus as to amount of time required for hearing, if

granted.

●

Case No: 2020-007685-CA-01 Page 1 of 2

Filing # 106756281 E-Filed 04/27/2020 04:58:29 PM Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 2 of 3
The only motions exempt from the meet and confer requirement are Motions for Injunctive Relief

Without Notice; Motions for Summary Judgment and Motions to Amend to Add Punitive Damages. 

ANY OTHER MOTION submitted without a certificate of conferral will be rejected by the Court without

prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 27th day of April,

2020.

2020-007685-CA-01 04-27-2020 4:47 PM

Hon. William Thomas

CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

Electronically Signed

No Further Judicial Action Required on THIS MOTION

CLERK TO RECLOSE CASE IF POST JUDGMENT

Electronically Served:

Scott Jay Feder, assistantscottjfeder@hotmail.com

Scott Jay Feder, scottj8@aol.com

Physically Served:

Case No: 2020-007685-CA-01 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 3 of 3
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Reclamation Information Sharing Environment (RISE)
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Ratesetting
            - CVP Annual Ratebooks & Schedules

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP)                  - About the CVP
                - Water Info Links
                - Ratesetting
                - Projects/Activities
                - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation          of the CVP and SWP
                - Laws/Regs/Links
                - Financial Information 
                - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
              - Programs & Activities
              - Projects & Facilities
              - Doing Business with Reclamation
              - Public Affairs 
              - Employment
              - Recreation
              - Site Index
              - Contact Us

## CVP Annual Ratebooks & Schedules 

*Last Updated: 1/16/24*

## More Information about the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

          - 
          - 
          - 
          - 
          - 
          - 
          - 
          - 

          - Contact Us
          - Site Index
          - Accessibility
          - Disclaimer
          - DOI
          - FOIA
          - No Fear Act
          - Notices
          - Privacy Policy
          - Quality of Information
          - Recreation.gov
          - USA.gov
§ 3809.415 How do I prevent unnecessary or undue degradation while conducting operations on public lands? You prevent unnecessary or undue degradation while conducting operations on public lands by— ( a ) Complying with § 3809.420, as applicable; the terms and conditions of your notice or approved plan of operations; and other Federal and State laws related to environmental protection and protection of cultural resources;
( b ) Assuring that your operations are “reasonably incident” to prospecting, mining, or processing operations and uses as defined in § 3715.0-5 of this title; and
( c ) Attaining the stated level of protection or reclamation required by specific laws in areas such as the California Desert Conservation Area, Wild and Scenic Rivers, BLM-administered portions of the National Wilderness System, and BLM-administered National Monuments and National Conservation Areas.
[65 FR 70112, Nov. 21, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 54861, Oct. 30, 2001]
### §1503. Set-offs

The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any set-off or demand by the United States against any plaintiff in such court.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 942; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §133(e)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §250(2) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §145, 36 Stat. 1136).

The second subsection of section 250 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., is incorporated in this section. The proviso, relating to suits for fees due officers of the United States, has been incorporated in section 2501 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "United States Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.