alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### PART III—PROCEDURE

Sec.
6231.
Notice of proceedings and adjustment.
6232.
Assessment, collection, and payment.
6233.
Interest and penalties.
6234.
Judicial review of partnership adjustment.
6235.
Period of limitations on making adjustments.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title II, §206(p)(11), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1183, amended part heading generally, substituting "PART III—PROCEDURE" for "PART 1—PROCEDURE".
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Yosemite
National Park
California


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Stargazing
 Visitor gazing up at stars.Glacier Point provides excellent night sky viewing during summer. Photo by J Zamudio

Yosemite National Park, miles from the nearest city lights, has a very dark night sky that makes it a great place to look at the stars.
Bring along a star chart and look for constellations, or look through binoculars at some of our planetary neighbors.
In June, July, and August, amateur astronomers often set up telescopes at Glacier Point on Saturdays, and astronomy walks or talks may also be offered in Yosemite Valley, Tuolumne Meadows, and Wawona.
Check *Yosemite Guide* for the current schedule.
More Information
Check this year's astronomy club schedule
Read NatureBridge educator Katie Wallace's blog entry, Yosemite Back to the Future: Chronicle 2 - Save Our Night Sky!
 Last updated: September 30, 2021
 Park footer Contact Info Phone: 209/372-0200 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4228

_____________________________

TIMOTHY RANDALL WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Steven B. Whittington, Judge.

March 22, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WOLF and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Rachael E. Bushey of O'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 102.27 Appeals from denials of requests for access to records. ( a ) *Appeals.* If the requester is dissatisfied with an office's response to his or her request for access to records, the requester may make a written appeal of the adverse determination denying the request in any respect to the SBA's FOI/PA Office, 409 3rd St., SW., Washington, DC 20416. The appeal must be received by the FOI/PA Office within 60 days of the date of the letter denying the request. The requester's appeal letter should include as much information as possible, including the identity of the office whose adverse determination is being appealed. Unless otherwise directed, the Chief, FOI/PA will decide all appeals under this subpart.
( b ) *Responses to appeals.* The decision on a requester's appeal will be made in writing not later than 30 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) after the date of receipt of such appeal. A decision affirming an adverse determination in whole or in part will include a brief statement of the reason(s) for the affirmation, including any Privacy Act exemption applied, and will inform the requester of the Privacy Act provisions for court review of the decision. If the adverse determination is reversed or modified on appeal in whole or in part, the requester will be notified in a written decision and his request will be reprocessed in accordance with that appeal decision.
( c ) *Judicial review.* In order to seek judicial review by a court of any adverse determination or denial of a request, a requester must first appeal it to the FOI/PA Office under this section.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte D e vin Paul Cole v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00748

- CR

Trial court case number: 1693755

Trial court: 184th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Davin Paul Cole, was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in The State of Texas v. Devin Paul Cole

, cause number 1666250 in the 184th District Court of Harris County, Texas

. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s denial of his pre

- trial habeas petition seeking release on personal bond. After filing the appeal, the case was resolved by plea bargain agreement and appellant was sentenced to two years ’ imprisonment. The judgment of conviction was sign ed on February 9, 2021.

Issues concerning pretrial release are moot after a defendant is convicted. See Martinez v.

State , 826 S.W.2d 620, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). Accordingly, the district court clerk is directed to file a supplem ental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s judgment of conviction in cause

number 1666250

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 34.5(c). The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed in the First Court of Appeals within 7 days of the date of this order

.
It is so OR DERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Gordon Goodman

___________________ _________________

Acting individually

Date: __ August 10, 2021

____________________
§ 8343.1 Standards. ( a ) No off-road vehicle may be operated on public lands unless equipped with brakes in good working condition.
( b ) No off-road vehicle equipped with a muffler cutout, bypass, or similar device, or producing excessive noise exceeding Environmental Protection Agency standards, when established, may be operated on public lands.
( c ) By posting appropriate signs or by marking a map which shall be available for public inspection at local Bureau offices, the authorized officer may indicate those public lands upon which no off-road vehicle may be operated unless equipped with a properly installed spark arrester. The spark arrester must meet either the U.S. Department of Agriculture—Forest Service Standard 5100-1a, or the 80-percent efficiency level standard when determined by the appropriate Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Recommended Practices J335 or J350. These standards include, among others, the requirements that: ( 1 ) The spark arrester shall have an efficiency to retain or destroy at least 80 percent of carbon particles for all flow rates, and
( 2 ) the spark arrester has been warranted by its manufacturer as meeting this efficiency requirement for at least 1,000 hours subject to normal use, with maintenance and mounting in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendation. A spark arrester is not required when an off-road vehicle is being operated in an area which has 3 or more inches of snow on the ground.
( d ) Vehicles operating during night hours, from a half-hour after sunset to a half-hour before sunrise, shall comply with the following: ( 1 ) Headlights shall be of sufficient power to illuminate an object at 300 feet at night under normal, clear atmospheric conditions. Two- or three-wheeled vehicles or single-tracked vehicles will have a minimum of one headlight. Vehicles having four or more wheels or more than a single track will have a minimum of two headlights, except double tracked snowmachines with a maximum capacity of two people may have only one headlight.
( 2 ) Red taillights, capable of being seen at a distance of 500 feet from the rear at night under normal, clear atmospheric conditions, are required on vehicles in the same numbers as headlights.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Spill Response





Contact Us
  Supporting, Serving and Coordinating  National Park Service (NPS) managers are responsible for preserving and protecting public lands and, in some instances, surrounding waters and submerged lands. When an oil discharge or release of hazardous substances impacts or threatens to impact resources managed by the National Park Service, park resources may be at risk.
The NPS Spill Response Program: Supports and advises parks and regions in the event of a hazardous spill that threatens park resources, including 24/7 assistance to parks when a hazardous spill occurs.
Serves as a contact for park staff on policy guidance in spill response activities and clean-up.
Coordinates with appropriate NPS staff to promote preparedness, planning, and spill response training. Learn more about what to do if you see a spill, spills in national parks and the effects of oil spills through the links below.
  Stairs lead down to a lighthouse on the Point Reyes National SeashoreWhat to do if you see a spill Learn who to contact and what to tell them.
 Oil stained birds perch on a San Francisco Bay rock after the Cosco Busan oil spill in 2007.Spills in National Parks Learn about the possible types of spills that could affect the National Park System.
 Waves crash on a bedrock shelf along the shore of Lake Superior.Park Preparation Plans Several units of the NPS have prepared spill response plans - learn more about them here.
 Last updated: September 9, 2022
 What we do when a spill happens
 Prepare
 Respond
 Restore
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### Harley M. SORENSEN, Petitioner, v. Jack YOUNG, Warden, Respondent.

No. 3-68 Civ. 111.

United States District Court D. Minnesota, Third Division.

April 19, 1968.

*1010Harley M. Sorensen, pro se.

No appearance for respondent.

NEVILLE, District Judge.

Petitioner, convicted in State court and sentenced indeterminately “not to exceed 20 years,” seeks a writ of habeas corpus contending his constitutional rights have been violated because he was “denied counsel during sentence review by the Adult Corrections Commission.” The Adult Corrections Commission exercises parole jurisdiction under Minnesota Statutes, M.S.A. § 243.05 and can adjust sentences and release prisoners. The statute provides in part:

> “In considering applications for parole or final release, the commission shall not be required to hear oral argument from any attorney or other person not connected with the prison or the reformatory in favor of or against the parole or release of any prisoners, * * *."

At the review of petitioner’s case by the commission on February 1, 1968, his confinement was ordered continued for three more years.

Petitioner apparently applied for relief first to the State Court. Upon a denial of his petition by the lower court under the Minnesota 1967 post conviction remedy statute, he alleges he wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court and received a reply to the effect that “I know of no provision in the law for appointment of counsel before the Adult Corrections Commission.”

Even the most liberal interpretation of Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967), Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967) and other decisions does not suggest that a prisoner is entitled to counsel before parole boards or commissions reviewing a prisoner’s sentence to determine his possible early release on parole. There is no judicial authority cited nor to be found for petitioner’s position. Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128, 88 S.Ct. 254, 19 L.Ed.2d 336 (1967) accorded an attorney to a defendant where his probation was sought to be revoked. The rationale of that case has no application to the situation at hand. In *Mempa*deferred sentencing in effect was involved. In the case at bar, parole considerations follow long after the completion of the sentencing procedures as a matter of the State’s leniency, largesse and discretion exercised in an effort to act in the best interest of the public and of the individual involved. Parole consideration is not a proceeding against a defendant within the meaning of constitutional guarantees.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied. A separate order has been filed.
§ 661.315 Who are the required members of the Local Workforce Investment Boards? ( a ) The membership of Local Board must be selected in accordance with criteria established under WIA section 117(b)(1) and must meet the requirements of WIA section 117(b)(2). The Local Board must contain two or more members representing the categories described in WIA section 117(b)(2)(A)(ii)-(v), and special consideration must be given to the entities identified in WIA section 117(b)(2)(A)(ii), (iv) and (v) in the selection of members representing those categories. The Local Board must contain at least one member representing each One-Stop partner.
( b ) The membership of Local Boards may include individuals or representatives of other appropriate entities, including entities representing individuals with multiple barriers to employment and other special populations, as determined by the chief elected official.
( c ) Members who represent organizations, agencies or other entities must be individuals with optimum policy making authority within the entities they represent.
( d ) A majority of the members of the Local Board must be representatives of business in the local area. Members representing business must be individuals who are owners, chief executive officers, chief operating officers, or other individuals with optimum policymaking or hiring authority. Business representatives serving on Local Boards may also serve on the State Board.
( e ) Chief elected officials must appoint the business representatives from among individuals who are nominated by local business organizations and business trade associations. Chief elected officials must appoint the labor representatives from among individuals who are nominated by local labor federations (or, for a local area in which no employees are represented by such organizations, other representatives of employees). (WIA sec. 117(b).)
( f ) An individual may be appointed as a representative of more than one entity if the individual meets all the criteria for representation, including the criteria described in paragraphs (c) through (e) of this section, for each entity.
### §1399. Partition action involving United States

Any civil action by any tenant in common or joint tenant for the partition of lands, where the United States is one of the tenants in common or joint tenants, may be brought only in the judicial district where such lands are located or, if located in different districts in the same State, in any of such districts.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 936.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(25) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 25, 36 Stat. 1094).

Provisions of section 41(25) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to jurisdiction are the basis of section 1347 of this title.

Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits in equity," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Provision with respect to property in different districts was added to conform with section 1392 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.
### §6102. Computations on returns or other documents

#### (a) Amounts shown on internal revenue forms

The Secretary is authorized to provide with respect to any amount required to be shown on a form prescribed for any internal revenue return, statement, or other document, that if such amount of such item is other than a whole-dollar amount, either—

(1) the fractional part of a dollar shall be disregarded; or

(2) the fractional part of a dollar shall be disregarded unless it amounts to one-half dollar or more, in which case the amount (determined without regard to the fractional part of a dollar) shall be increased by $1.

#### (b) Election not to use whole dollar amounts

Any person making a return, statement, or other document shall be allowed, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, to make such return, statement, or other document without regard to subsection (a).

#### (c) Inapplicability to computation of amount

The provisions of subsections (a) and (b) shall not be applicable to items which must be taken into account in making the computations necessary to determine the amount required to be shown on a form, but shall be applicable only to such final amount.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 753; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
§ 107.210 Minimum capital requirements for Licensees. ( a ) *Companies licensed on or after October 1, 1996.* A company licensed on or after October 1, 1996, must have Leverageable Capital of at least $2,500,000 and must meet the applicable minimum Regulatory Capital requirement in this paragraph (a), unless lower Leverageable Capital and Regulatory Capital amounts are approved by SBA as part of a Wind-down Plan in accordance with § 107.590(c): ( 1 ) *Licensees other than Early Stage SBICs.* Except for Early Stage SBICs, a Licensee must have Regulatory Capital of at least $5,000,000. As an exception to the general rule in this paragraph (a)(1), SBA in its sole discretion and based on a showing of special circumstances and good cause, which includes applicants that are headquartered in an Underlicensed State, may license an applicant with Regulatory Capital of at least $3,000,000, but only if the applicant: ( i ) Has satisfied all licensing standards and requirements except the minimum capital requirement, as determined solely by SBA;
( ii ) Has a viable business plan reasonably projecting profitable operations; and
( iii ) Has a reasonable timetable for achieving Regulatory Capital of at least $5,000,000.
( 2 ) *Early Stage SBICs.* An Early Stage SBIC must have Regulatory Capital of at least $20 million.
( b ) *Companies licensed before October 1, 1996.* A company licensed before October 1, 1996 must meet the minimum capital requirements applicable to such company, as required by the regulations in effect on September 30, 1996. See § 107.1120(c)(2) for Leverage eligibility requirements.
[63 FR 5866, Feb. 5, 1998, as amended at 77 FR 25051, Apr. 27, 2012; 82 FR 39340, Aug. 18, 2017; 88 FR 46007, July 18, 2023]
#### § 9268.4 Visual resource management. [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of New Energy Systems Group, (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K/A for year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Weihe Yu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 10, 2011




/s/ Weihe YuWeihe Yu

Chief Executive Officer
### **CHAPTER 70—JEOPARDY, RECEIVERSHIPS, ETC.**

Subchapter
Sec. 1
A.
Jeopardy
6851

B.
Receiverships, etc
6871

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–589, §6(g)(3)(C), (D), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3410, substituted "JEOPARDY, RECEIVERSHIPS ETC." for "JEOPARDY, BANKRUPTCY AND RECEIVERSHIPS" in chapter heading, and "Receiverships, etc." for "Bankruptcy and receiverships" in item for subchapter B.

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
EXHIBIT E

REGISTRATION

Case 1:20-cv-22393-CMA Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 1 of 4
Registration #: TX0008801580

Service Request #: 1-8253756101

Mail Certificate

Ferraiuoli LLC

Jean Vidal-Font

221 Ponce de Leon Avenue

5th Floor

San Juan, PR 00917 

Priority: Special Handling Application Date: November 14, 2019

Correspondent

Organization Name: Ferraiuoli LLC

Name: Jean Vidal-Font

Email: jvidal@ferraiuoli.com

Telephone: (787)766-7000

Fax: (787)766-7001

Address: 221 Ponce de Leon Avenue

5th Floor

San Juan, PR 00917 

Case 1:20-cv-22393-CMA Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 2 of 4
Page 1 of 2

Registration Number

TX 8-801-580

Effective Date of Registration:

November 14, 2019

Registration Decision Date:

November 15, 2019

 

Title

Title of Work: Accessories sell Out Strategy

Completion/Publication

Year of Completion: 2015

Date of 1st Publication: January 04, 2016

Nation of 1st Publication: United States

Author

• Author: Software Brokers of America, Inc.

Author Created: text

Work made for hire: Yes

Copyright Claimant

Copyright Claimant: Software Brokers of America, Inc.

520 South Dixie Highway, Hallandale, FL, 33009, United States

0

1

Rights and Permissions

Organization Name: Software Brokers of America, Inc.

Address: 520 South Dixie Highway

Hallandale, FL 33009 United States

Certification

Name: Jean Vidal-Font

Date: November 14, 2019

Date: November 14, 2019

Case 1:20-cv-22393-CMA Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 3 of 4
Page 2 of 2

Approved

Correspondence: Yes

Case 1:20-cv-22393-CMA Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of China Digital Communication Group (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wu
      Jiangcheng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:





1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                October 15, 2008
            */s/
                Wu Jiangcheng*Wu
                JiangchengChief
                Financial Officer
### §2102. Priority of criminal case on appeal from State court

Criminal cases on review from State courts shall have priority, on the docket of the Supreme Court, over all cases except cases to which the United States is a party and such other cases as the court may decide to be of public importance.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 962.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §351 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §253, 36 Stat. 1160; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §1, 45 Stat. 54).

Changes were made in phraseology.