alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Tilley *v.*Stewart, administrator

November 18, 1910.

Complaint. Before Judge Edwards. Bockdale superior court. December 21, 1908.

*A. C. & J. H. McCalla,*for plaintiif in error.

*J. R. Irwin,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where an action was brought on an open account for charges of a warehouseman in connection with storing and shipping cotton and guano, and like charges, to which the defendant interposed a plea of set-off, attaching an open account, one item of which read, “To loss and shortage on weights, cotton of defendant, while in warehouse of plaintiff, $433.50,” a ground of a motion for new trial, made by the defendant, which merely stated that the court “erred in refusing to allow defendant to prove, by his own and other testimony, as he proposed to do, the amount of damages and loss he sustained by the loss of weight of cotton while stored in his, plaintiff’s, warehouse, as set forth in his, defendant’s, plea of set-off, which is hereby referred to as part of this ground,” did not show what testimony, was offered, or that if admitted it was such as would tend to establish liability on the part of the plaintiff; and such ground presents no cause for a reversal.

2. None of the other grounds of the motion for a new trial are such as to show that a reversal would' be proper; the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict; and there was no error in overruling the motion. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of InstaCare Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith Berman, Principal Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Keith Berman Keith Berman  Chief Financial Officer and Principal Executive Officer September 29, 2008
```

[House Document 109-32]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

109th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 109-32

 
     CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  FROM

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              TRANSMITTING

CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA OF THE 
 SPECIFIED ITEMS IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE UNITED STATES SPACE LAUNCH 
 INDUSTRY, AND THAT THE MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ANY INDIRECT 
  TECHNICAL BENEFIT THAT COULD BE DERIVED FROM SUCH EXPORTS, WILL NOT 
  MEASURABLY IMPROVE THE MISSILE OR SPACE LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE 
   PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105-261, SEC. 1512

June 7, 2005.--Referred to the Committee on International Relations and 
                         ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                          Washington, June 2, 2005.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: In accordance with the provisions of 
section 1512 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261), I 
hereby certify that the export to the People's Republic of 
China of the following items is not detrimental to the United 
States space launch industry, and that the material and 
equipment, including any indirect technical benefit that could 
be derived from such exports, will not measurably improve the 
missile or space launch capabilities of the People's Republic 
of China.
    1. Three kilograms of Hydroxyl Terminated Polybutadiene 
resin, for the Shaanxi Hengtong Intelligent Machine Company, 
Limited, located in Xian, People's Republic of China, to be 
used for a research and development effort to produce a photo-
curable resin for stereolithography equipment;
    2. One combined thermal chamber and vibration test system, 
for the Yongji Electric Machine Factory, located in Yongji, 
People's Republic of China, to be used for thermal and 
vibration testing of locomotive engines;
    3. One computer-controlled three-axes filament winding 
machine, for the Wave Cyber (Shanghai) Company Limited, located 
in Shanghai, People's Republic of China, to be used for 
production of small residential and light commercial pressure 
composite tanks and low pressure fiberglass water softener 
tanks; and
    4. One 40 gallon double planetary vacuum mixer, for the 
Indium Corporation (Suzhou) Company Limited, located in Suzhou, 
People's Republic of China, to produce specialty materials for 
electronics assemblies, including solder paste.
            Sincerely,
                                                    George W. Bush.

                                  

```
#### § 4770.4 Arrest.

The Director of the Bureau of Land Management may authorize an employee who witnesses a violation of the Act or these regulations to arrest without warrant any person committing the violation, and to take the person immediately for examination or trial before an officer or court of competent jurisdiction. Any employee so authorized shall have power to execute any warrant or other process issued by an officer or court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of the Act or these regulations.
Exhibit 4.9


 


Description of the Company’s Common
Stock Registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act of 1934


 


The following summary of Intellinetics,
Inc.’s common stock is based on and qualified by the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Articles”)
and Bylaws, as amended (“Bylaws”). For a complete description of the terms and provisions of the Company’s common
stock, refer to the Articles and Bylaws, both of which are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


 


The Company’s authorized capital
stock consists of 25,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share.


 


Holders of shares of common stock are entitled
to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders. Shares of common stock do not have cumulative voting
rights. Holders of record of shares of common stock are entitled to receive dividends when and if declared by the Board of Directors.
To date, we have not paid cash dividends. We intend to retain any earnings for the operation and expansion of our business and
do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.


 


Any future determination as to the payment
of cash dividends will depend on future earnings, results of operations, capital requirements, financial condition and such other
factors as the Board of Directors may consider. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders of our common stock are
entitled to share ratably in all assets that are legally available for distribution.


 


Holders of our common stock do not have pre-emptive
rights to subscribe for or to purchase any stock, obligations or other securities.


 


All of the shares of common stock currently
issued are fully paid and non-assessable.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Wayne Lipschitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Grill Concepts, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Grill Concepts, Inc.



By:

/s/ Wayne LipschitzName:

Wayne LipschitzTitle:

CFO and Principal Financial and Accounting OfficerNovember 9, 2007
PUBLIC LAW 109–34—JULY 12, 2005 119 STAT. 377

Public Law 109–34

109th Congress

An Act

To amend the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 to strike the privatization

criteria for INTELSAT separated entities, remove certain restrictions on separated

and successor entities to INTELSAT, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF OFFICERS, MANAGERS, OR

DIRECTORS.

Section 621(5)(D) of the Communications Satellite Act of 1962

(47 U.S.C. 763(5)(D)) is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘(I)’’ in clause (ii);

(2) by striking ‘‘signatories, or (II)’’ in clause (ii) and all

that follows through ‘‘mechanism;’’ and inserting ‘‘signatories;

and’’;

(3) by striking ‘‘organization; and’’ in clause (iii) and

inserting ‘‘organization.’’; and

(4) by striking clause (iv).

SEC. 2. CRITERIA FOR INTELSAT SEPARATED ENTITIES.

Subtitle B of title VI of the Communications Satellite Act

of 1962 (47 U.S.C. 763 et seq.) is amended by striking section

623 (47 U.S.C. 763b).

SEC. 3. PRESERVATION OF SPACE SEGMENT CAPACITY OF THE GMDSS.

Section 624 of the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 (47

U.S.C. 763c) is amended to read as follows:

‘‘SEC. 624. SPACE SEGMENT CAPACITY OF THE GMDSS.

‘‘The United States shall preserve the space segment capacity

of the GMDSS. This section is not intended to alter the status

that the GMDSS would otherwise have under United States laws

and regulations of the International Telecommunication Union with

respect to spectrum, orbital locations, or other operational parameters, or to be a barrier to competition for the provision of GMDSS

services.’’.

SEC. 4. SATELLITE SERVICE REPORT.

(a) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Federal Communications Commission shall review competitive market conditions with respect to

domestic and international satellite communications services and

shall include in an annual report an analysis of those conditions.

The Commission shall transmit a copy of the report to the Senate

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the

House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce.

(b) CONTENT.—The Commission shall include in the report—

47 USC 703.

July 12, 2005

[S. 1282]

119 STAT. 378 PUBLIC LAW 109–34—JULY 12, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1282:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

June 21, considered and passed Senate.

June 29, considered and passed House.

Æ

(1) an identification of the number and market share of

competitors in domestic and international satellite markets;

(2) an analysis of whether there is effective competition

in the market for domestic and international satellite services;

and

(3) a list of any foreign nations in which legal or regulatory

practices restrict access to the market for satellite services

in such nation in a manner that undermines competition or

favors a particular competitor or set of competitors.

Approved July 12, 2005.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.476 Prohibited financing.

An SBLC may not make a loan to a small business that has received financing (or a commitment for financing) from an SBIC that is an Associate of the SBLC.

[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996. Redesignated at 73 FR 75516, Dec. 11, 2008]
Exhibit
10.16


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 2 TO


 


ROCKETFUEL
BLOCKCHAIN, INC.


 


2018
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This
Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) amends the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of
RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc., a Nevada corporation (formerly B4MC gold mines, Inc.)(the “Company”).


 


1.
Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment, capitalized terms have the meanings set forth in the Plan.


 


2.
Increase in Number of Shares subject to the Plan. Section 3(a) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:


 


(a)
Maximum Number of Shares. Subject to the provisions of Section 11(a) below, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may
be issued in connection with all Awards (including Incentive Stock Options) is 6,000,000 Shares. The Shares may be authorized
but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock or treasury shares.


 


3.
Stockholder Approval. This Amendment shall be submitted to the stockholders of the Company for approval within 12 months
after the date of its approval by the Company’s board of directors.


 


4.
Continuation. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


The
undersigned Secretary certifies that the foregoing sets forth Amendment No. 1 to the RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive
Plan as duly adopted by the Board as of March 18, 2021.


 


	Dated:
    March 18, 2021	/s/
    Bennett J. Yankowitz
		Bennett
    J. Yankowitz, Secretary
**Wind and Sand Program**

**Upper Middle School Worksheet (Grades 6-8)**

**Instructions:**Fill out this worksheet while following along with the “Wind and Sand” video.   

1. What did Wilbur believe? _________________________________________ 

2. What did Wilbur and Orville’s dad give them? ________________________________

3. Who was Otto Lilienthal? ________________________________________________

4. What four things do you need to figure out in order to fly?  

a. __________ 

b. __________ 

c. __________ 

d. Thrust 

5. What three things did the Wright brothers need in a good location? 

a. _______ 

b. _______ 

c. Isolation (not as many people) 

6. What do you notice about the area? 

_____________________________________________________________ 

7. What was the closest town when the Wright brothers were there? ____________________ 

8. How did they find out about the town of Kitty Hawk? 

_______________________________________________________ 

9. What do you find interesting about the first glider (1900)? 

_______________________________________________________ 

10. What was the problem with the second glider (1901)?

______________________________________ 

11. How were Wilbur and Orville feeling after the 1901 trip? 

______________________________________ 

12. Who encouraged Wilbur and Orville? _______________________________

13. What did Wilbur realize when he was at the conference? 

_______________________________ 

14. What did Wilbur and Orville do after the conference? 

__________________________________ 

15. What did they add to the 1902 glider? ________________________ 

16. How were Wilbur and Orville feeling after the 1902 trip? ___________________________

17. What two things did they have to add to the glider design in order to make a powered flyer?  

a. __________________________ 

b. __________________________ 

18. Who helped with their engine? ____________________________ 

19. When did they tell their family they would be home? _________________________

20. Who won the coin toss and tried to fly on Dec 14th? __________________ 

21. How did they signal to their friends that they needed help with the flyer? 

__________________________________ 

22. How far was the fourth flight? ____________ 

23. What job was John Daniels assigned that day? ________________________ 

24. What do you think is the most interesting thing about the first flight photo? 

_________________________________________________________________ 

25. What is one connection you made to the Wright brothers’ story? 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

# image1.png
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco VACA-ANDRADE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41078.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Francisco Vaca-Andrade (Vaca) appeals his conviction for illegal reentry by an alien after deportation. He argues that the provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Vaca’s constitutional challenge to § 1326(b) is foreclosed by *AlmendarezTorres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Athough Vaca contends that *AlmendarezTorres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert, denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Vaca properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Valentine Girards et al., Appellants, v. Oil Well *&*All’s Well Retail Sales and Service Corporation, Respondent, et al., Undertenant.

Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.; MaeCrate, J., not voting.
----

----

----

III Informaciones

Oficina Europea de Selección de Personal (EPSO)

----

LISTA DE RESERVA (1)

OPOSICIÓN GENERAL EPSO/AST/1/04

OFICIALES (C*1)

(2005/C 285 A/01)

Técnicos de conferencia

ASCHBERGER Andreas

BARQUILLA GONZÁLEZ Luis Enrique

BUSQUETS PÉREZ Luis Carlos

CAMPAROLAS SAMPIETRO Jorge

DELVAUX Eddy

DEMANET Vincent

DI TRANI Domenico

FALKOWSKI Reinhold Bruno

HERTOGS Roel

HEURCKMANS Edgard

KANKAANPAEAE Matti

KLEWAIS Johan

KOLLING Andreas

LAUDES Herman

MARTÍNEZ VÁZQUEZ Alberto

MIGACZ Michel

MUNTANE GREGORI Neus

PIRSON Louis

SERRY Luc

VAN CAUTER Jozef

VAN DE CALSEYDE Arnaud

VYNCKE Pieter

La vigencia de las listas de reserva expirará el 31 de diciembre de 2006, aunque podrá ser prorrogada.

----

(1)  A petición expresa de los candidatos seleccionados, su nombre no se publicará.

----
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A


                                   KOWTOW, INC.
             (exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

         NEVADA                                             87-0434297
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                          Identification Number)

3098 South Highland Drive, Suite 460
Salt Lake City, Utah                                        84106
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (801) 485-7775

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

     The undersigned  registrant  hereby amends the following  items,  financial
statements,  exhibits or other portions of its Form 10-Q dated August 8, 1996 as
set forth in the page attached hereto:

                      Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule




<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                 KOWTOW, INC.


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ Krista Nielson
                                 Krista Nielson, President, CEO and Director


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ David R. Yeaman
                                 David R. Yeaman, Secretary/Treasurer,
                                                  CFO and Director
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Star-Spangled Banner Trail Passport Stamps

Star-Spangled Banner National Historic Trail
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Washington Monument
District of Columbia
EXHIBIT 8

                              List of Subsidiaries

The following chart sets forth, as of June 1, 2002, all significant
subsidiaries, as defined in Rule 1-20 or Regulation S-X under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and certain other subsidiaries of Copamex, S.A. de C.V.

                                                               Jurisdiction of
Name of Company                                                 Establishment
                                                              ----------------

Copamex Papeles para Escritura e Impresion, S.A. de C.V...         Mexico
         Pondercel, S.A. de C.V...........................         Mexico
         Comercializadora Copamex, S.A. de C.V............         Mexico

Copamex Empaque, S.A. de C.V..............................         Mexico
         Sacos y Envases Industriales, S.A. de C.V........         Mexico
         Copamex Corrugados, S.A. de C.V..................         Mexico
         Papelera de Chihuahua, S.A. de C.V...............         Mexico
         Maquinaria y Equipo Pachisa, S.A. de C.V.........         Mexico
         Maquinaria y Equipo Papelera, S.A. de C.V........         Mexico
         Cia. Papelera Maldonado, S.A. de C.V.............         Mexico
         Maquinaria y Equipo Seisa, S.A. de C.V...........         Mexico

Copamex Productos al Consumidor, S.A. de C.V..............         Mexico
         Sancela, S.A. de C.V.............................         Mexico
         Industrial Papelera Mexicana, S.A. de C.V........         Mexico
         Papeles Higienicos de Mexico, S.A. de C.V........         Mexico
         Papeles Higienicos del Centro, S.A. de C.V. .....         Mexico
         Copamex Comercial, S.A. de C.V. .................         Mexico

Others
Corporativo Copamex, S.A. de C.V..........................         Mexico
Grupo Copamex de Centroamerica, S.A.......................         Costa Rica
Industrias Unidas de Centroamerica, S.A...................         Nicaragua