alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.454

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182984 dated July 19, 2016

 

For Rendering

 

Mobile radio telephone services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 19, 2021.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated June 05, 2020 No. 233-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 3 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here

Official seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS

OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE

OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY

AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 120046
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Licensing of Reactor Facilities Prior to Issuance of Operating License

## HPPOS-120 PDR-9111210277

See the memorandum from G. H. Cunningham III to D. A. Nussbaumer dated April 18, 1980. 

For reactors in Agreement States, it is an OELD opinion that NRC retains jurisdiction to license use of radioactive materials that are directly connected with reactor operations and are needed during the construction and preoperational phases of a reactor. HPPOS-265 contains a related topic.

Guidance was sought concerning the licensing of utilities located in Agreement States to possess and use radioactive materials at reactor facilities prior to the issuance of operating licenses. The particular question raised was whether NRC or the Agreement State was authorized to issue licenses for radioactive materials possessed and used at such facilities when the materials were directly connected with reactor operations and were needed during the construction and preoperational phases of a reactor.

It is OELD opinion that NRC retains exclusive jurisdiction to license such materials when the materials are possessed and used by the utility for the purposes described. This conclusion flows from Section 274c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, which provides in pertinent part that "No agreement entered into [with a state] ... shall provide for discontinuance of any authority and the Commission shall retain authority and operation of any production or utilization facility ...." The attached informal legal memo, prepared in 1969, sets forth the rationale for this conclusion.

**Regulatory references:** Atomic Energy Act, 10 CFR 150.15

**Subject codes:** 11.3, 12.2, 12.9

**Applicability:** Byproduct and Special Nuclear Materials

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 16, 2017
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.1712 Seller responsibilities with respect to Seller's Pool Loan.

Seller shall remain obligated for servicing and liquidating Seller's Pool Loan until the Pool Loan is repaid in full unless SBA provides written approval or notice to the contrary.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.202 Loans for changes of ownership.

A Borrower may use 7(a) loan proceeds to purchase a portion of or the entirety of an owner's interest in a business, or a portion of or the entirety of a business itself.

[88 FR 21086, Apr. 10, 2023]
Director Compensation Summary Term Sheet



	Exhibit 10(d)


	 


	 


	1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION


	Director Compensation Summary Term Sheet


	 


	Compensation to be paid to the following directors, whether or not executive officers of the Company, will be as follows: 


	 


	Name of Director

	Compensation


	 

	 


	Ben F. Cheek,. III (Chairman Emeritus)

	$-  * 


	Ben F. Cheek, IV  (Chairman)

	$35,000 


	Virginia C. Herring

	$35,000 


	A. Roger Guimond

	$35,000 


	James H. Harris, III

	$35,000 


	Jerry J. Harrison, Jr.

	$35,000 


	John G. Sample, Jr. (Audit Committee Chairman)

	$40,000 


	C. Dean Scarborough

	$35,000 


	Keith D. Watson

	$35,000 


	 

	 


	* Note:  Ben F, Cheek, III elected not to receive any Director fees.
-cr-06218-NCR Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2001 P
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.551 Who is eligible for homestead protection? SBA must notify the Borrower in possession of the availability of these homestead protection rights within 30 days after SBA acquires the property. A farmer-Borrower must: ( a ) Apply for the homestead occupancy to the SBA field office which serviced the loan within 90 days after SBA acquires the property;
( b ) Provide evidence that the farm produces farm income reasonable for the area and economic conditions;
( c ) Show that at least 60 percent of the Borrower and spouse's gross annual income came from farm or ranch operations in at least any two out of the last six calendar years;
( d ) Have resided on the property during the previous six years; and
( e ) Be personally liable for the debt.
-cr-06218-NCR Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2000 P
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.708 What is the Intermediary's financial contribution?

The Intermediary must contribute from non-Federal sources an amount equal to 15 percent of any loan that it receives from SBA. The contribution may not be borrowed. For purposes of this program, Community Development Block Grants are considered non-Federal sources.
### §352. Review of complaint by chief judge

(a) Expeditious Review; Limited Inquiry.—The chief judge shall expeditiously review any complaint received under section 351(a) or identified under section 351(b). In determining what action to take, the chief judge may conduct a limited inquiry for the purpose of determining—

(1) whether appropriate corrective action has been or can be taken without the necessity for a formal investigation; and

(2) whether the facts stated in the complaint are either plainly untrue or are incapable of being established through investigation.

For this purpose, the chief judge may request the judge whose conduct is complained of to file a written response to the complaint. Such response shall not be made available to the complainant unless authorized by the judge filing the response. The chief judge or his or her designee may also communicate orally or in writing with the complainant, the judge whose conduct is complained of, and any other person who may have knowledge of the matter, and may review any transcripts or other relevant documents. The chief judge shall not undertake to make findings of fact about any matter that is reasonably in dispute.

(b) Action by Chief Judge Following Review.—After expeditiously reviewing a complaint under subsection (a), the chief judge, by written order stating his or her reasons, may—

(1) dismiss the complaint—

(A) if the chief judge finds the complaint to be—

(i) not in conformity with section 351(a);

(ii) directly related to the merits of a decision or procedural ruling; or

(iii) frivolous, lacking sufficient evidence to raise an inference that misconduct has occurred, or containing allegations which are incapable of being established through investigation; or

(B) when a limited inquiry conducted under subsection (a) demonstrates that the allegations in the complaint lack any factual foundation or are conclusively refuted by objective evidence; or

(2) conclude the proceeding if the chief judge finds that appropriate corrective action has been taken or that action on the complaint is no longer necessary because of intervening events.

The chief judge shall transmit copies of the written order to the complainant and to the judge whose conduct is the subject of the complaint.

(c) Review of Orders of Chief Judge.—A complainant or judge aggrieved by a final order of the chief judge under this section may petition the judicial council of the circuit for review thereof. The denial of a petition for review of the chief judge's order shall be final and conclusive and shall not be judicially reviewable on appeal or otherwise.

(d) Referral of Petitions for Review to Panels of the Judicial Council.—Each judicial council may, pursuant to rules prescribed under section 358, refer a petition for review filed under subsection (c) to a panel of no fewer than 5 members of the council, at least 2 of whom shall be district judges.

(Added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11042(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1849.)
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# NPS Passport Stamp

Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument
HomeAbout NRCNRC COVID-19 Update

COVID-19 Activities: **Operating Reactors** | **Nuclear Materials** | **Security and EP**

**Our Goal**

----

**Current Regulatory Issues**

### Focusing on Safety While Providing Temporary Flexibility

### 10 CFR Part 20 RespiratoryRadiological Protection Requirements*[Online Submissions Now Available]*

### 10 CFR Part 26Work Hour Requirements*[Online Submissions Now Available]*

### 10 CFR Part 50.48Fire Brigade Requirements

### 10 CFR Part 55Operators' Licenses*[Online Submissions Now Available]*

### 10 CFR 50.55aCodes and Standards*[Licensee Portal Under Development]*

### 10 CFR 50.55aOwner's Activity Reports

### 10 CFR Part 73Physical Protection

### Guidance forResident Inspectors

### Approved COVID-19 Licensing Requests

### Researchand Test Reactors 

----

**Stay Connected**

Despite NRC staff working remotely, the NRC continues to hold public meetings via virtual collaboration tools and is committed to openness, transparency, and public engagement as part of our decision making process.

**Key Public Meetings**
                - October 15, 2020  – Public Meeting with Nuclear Industry to Discuss Potential Future Licensing Issues to Address the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency Beyond 2020
                - June 30, 2020  – Path Forward For Licensing and Oversight with Respect to COVID-19 Impacts
                - June 23, 2020  – Emergency Preparedness
                - May 27, 2020  – COVID-19 Potential Licensing Needs
                - April 30, 2020  – Emergency Preparedness
                - April 29, 2020  – 10 CFR 50.48 Fire Protection
                - April 15, 2020  – 10 CFR Part 20 Requirements
                - April 2, 2020  – Work Hour Requirements
                - March 26, 2020  – Refueling Outage Issues
                - March 20, 2020  – COVID–19 Regulatory Impacts

** **

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 14, 2022
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7732

MICHAEL GENE JORDAN, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Correction; GEORGE KENWORTHY, Superintendent, Lumberton Correctional Center, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-hc-02025) Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 22, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Gene Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Gene Jordan seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jordan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
### [§7234. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1904(b)(7)(B)(i), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1815]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 858, related to false branding, selling, or packing of oleomargarine, removal or defacement of stamps, marks, or brands on packages of oleomargarine or adulterated butter, failure of wholesale dealers to keep or permit inspection of books, or to render returns, and offenses involving imported oleomargarine or adulterated butter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on first day of first month which begins more than 90 days after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1904(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as an Effective Date of 1976 Amendment note under section 4041 of this title.
### [§120. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §221(a)(19)(A), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4039]

Section, added Pub. L. 94–455, title XXI, §2134(a), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1926; amended Pub. L. 97–34, title VIII, §802(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 349; Pub. L. 97–448, title I, §108(a), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2391; Pub. L. 98–612, §1(a), (b)(3)(A), Oct. 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 3180, 3181; Pub. L. 99–514, title XI, §§1114(b)(3), 1151(c)(3), (g)(1), 1162(b), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2450, 2503, 2506, 2510; Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1011B(a)(31)(B), title IV, §4002(a), (b)(1), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3488, 3643; Pub. L. 101–140, title II, §203(a)(1), (2), Nov. 8, 1989, 103 Stat. 830; Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7102(a)(1), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2305; Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11404(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–473; Pub. L. 102–227, title I, §104(a)(1), Dec. 11, 1991, 105 Stat. 1687; Pub. L. 108–311, title II, §207(10), Oct. 4, 2004, 118 Stat. 1177, related to amounts received under qualified group legal services plans.

A prior section 120, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 39, related to statutory subsistence allowance received by police, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 85–866, title I, §3(a), (c), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1607, effective with respect to taxable years ending after Sept. 30, 1958, but only with respect to amounts received as a statutory subsistence allowance for any day after Sept. 30, 1958.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 19, 2014, subject to a savings provision, see section 221(b) of Pub. L. 113–295, set out as an Effective Date of 2014 Amendment note under section 1 of this title.
#### § 131.510 SBA review authority.

To ensure compliance and the effectiveness of WBCs, OWBO staff will coordinate with SBA district offices to provide periodic programmatic site visits on behalf of OWBO. Prior to conducting such visits, SBA district office personnel will coordinate with and provide written notice to the WBC Program Director. The SBA's district office personnel may inspect WBC records and client files to analyze and assess WBC activities, and, if necessary, make recommendations for improved service delivery to the OWBO Program Analyst. Periodic district office site visits do not supersede or replace OWBO site visits.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Trail Of Tears
National Historic Trail
AL, AR, GA, IL, KY, MO, NC, OK, TN


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Trail of Tears Guidebooks
 There is no standard, widely-recognized guidebook that today's travelers can use to follow the main Trail of Tears routes (between the southern Appalachian Mountains and Oklahoma) and that help travelers locate important historical sites, trail segments, and interpretive sites along the way. The following books, however, collectively provide a substantial amount of trail-related site information.
Department of Arkansas Heritage, *Heritage Trail, a Guide to Historic Arkansas Trails: Butterfield Trail, Civil War Trails, Southwest Trail, Trail of Tears* (Little Rock, the author), 2012.
Duncan, Barbara R., and Brett H. Riggs, *Cherokee Heritage Trails Guidebook* (Chapel Hill, Museum of the Cherokee Indian and University of North Carolina Press), 2003.
Fitzgerald, David, and Duane H. King, *Cherokee Trail of Tears* (Portland, Oregon, Graphic Arts Books), 2007.
Gilbert, Joan, *Trail of Tears Across Missouri* (Columbia, University of Missouri Press), 1996.
Latch, Darrell, *The Trail of Tears through Arkansas and Oklahoma* (Tuscola, Illinois, Son Light Power), 2007.
National Park Service, *Trail of Tears National Historic Trail: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Comprehensive Management and Use Plan*, 2 volumes (Denver, the author), 1992.
Rozema, Vicki, *Footsteps of the Cherokees, a Guide to the Eastern Homelands of the Cherokee Nation* (Winston-Salem, North Carolina, John F. Blair), 1995.
Tennessee Division of Archaeology, *The Trail of Tears in Tennessee: a Study of the Routes Used During the Cherokee Removal of 1838* (Nashville, the author), 2001.
 Last updated: February 13, 2019
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: National Trails Office Regions 6|7|8
Trail of Tears National Historic Trail
1100 Old Santa Fe Trail
Santa Fe,
NM
87505
 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### § 4720.2 Removal of strayed or excess animals from private lands.
Exhibit 4.451

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182553 dated July 28, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Data transmission services for voice

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 28, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 23, 2020 No. 172-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
    	
 
    
	
COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
    	
 
    
	
IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
    	
 
    
	
TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119606
461 P.2d 918

#### STATE of New Mexico, ex rel. Janice McLAM, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Richard A. STANLEY, Judge of the Third Judicial District, and the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Dona Ana, State of New Mexico, Respondents.

No. 8948.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Dec. 17, 1969.

MOISE, Chief Justice, and COMPTON, TACKETT and WATSON, JJ., concurring.

Ordered that the alternative writ of Mandamus heretofore issued in the above entitled cause, be and the same is hereby discharged.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         106,301
<SECURITIES>                                 2,250,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  372,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,424)
<INVENTORY>                                    546,628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,034,467
<PP&E>                                      20,219,208
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,840,788)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,662,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,436,357
<BONDS>                                      4,395,999
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    24,742,051
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,911,520)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,662,887
<SALES>                                      2,571,321
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,571,321
<CGS>                                        3,145,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,145,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               888,275
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (73,548)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,509,211)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,509,211)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,509,211)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)
        

</TABLE>