alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dear Stakeholders:

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will hold a public meeting to discuss and receive comments on issues presented in a rulemaking to establish standby and off mode test procedures for microwave ovens. The public meeting will also serve as a first step in considering the development of a new active mode test proc edure for microwave ovens. The public meeting will be held on Thursday, September 16, 2010, fr om 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 8E-089, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121.

The notices were published in the Federal Register on July 22, 2010 and contain instructions for submitting comments. The public comment perio d for the standby and off mode test procedure rulemaking ends October 4, 2010 . The notice of public meeting, supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking, and further information about the meeting are available on DOE’s website at the following link:

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_ standards/residential/microwave_ovens_snopr_ public_meeting.html

Please note that foreign nationals visiting DO E headquarters are subject to advance security screening procedures. If you are a foreign national and wish to attend this meeting, please inform DOE of this fact by contacting Brenda Edwa rds as soon as possible, at (202) 586-2945.

Regards,

Wes Anderson Project Manager US Department of Energy (202) 586-7335 Wes.Anderson@ee.doe.gov
#### Francis M. COX, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 12103.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued May 10, 1955.

Decided June 2, 1955.

Mr. Charles B. Murray, Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), for appellant.

Mr. John D. Lane, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., Lewis Carroll and Edward P. Troxell, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. Harold H. Greene, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before PRETTYMAN, FAHY and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of perjury and false swearing in a pauper’s oath before the United States Commissioner, which oath was taken in order to secure his discharge from indefinite parole supervision. Appellant had been sentenced to fine and imprisonment. He served the term of imprisonment imposed, and was under supervision due to non-payment of the fine at the time he made the oath in order to secure his discharge.

He here urges error in the admission and exclusion of evidence and in the instructions to the jury.1 One of these points was not raised in the trial court. We have nevertheless examined this claim of error and find no reason to depart from the Rules or to exercise the discretionary power we have in cases of plain errors affecting substantial rights.2

Nor on the other points raised do we find error.

Affirmed.

1

. Other counsel represented appellant at the trial in the District Court.

2

. Fed.Rules Crim.Proc. rules 30, 51, 52, 18 U.S.C.A.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT To 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of E Med Future, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the Report)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                      |  |                        
|------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Ochsendorf              |  | /s/ Donald Sullivan    
|Robert J. Ochsendorf                  |  | Donald Sullivan        
|PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Date: November 12, 2004
§ 113.430 Financial assistance. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, in providing financial assistance to any of its students, a recipient shall not: ( 1 ) On the basis of sex, provide different amounts or types of such assistance, limit eligibility for such assistance that is of any particular type or source, apply different criteria, or otherwise discriminate;
( 2 ) Through solicitation, listing, approval, provision of facilities, or other services, assist any foundation, trust, agency, organization, or person that provides assistance to any of such recipient's students in a manner that discriminates on the basis of sex; or
( 3 ) Apply any rule or assist in application of any rule concerning eligibility for such assistance that treats persons of one sex differently from persons of the other sex with regard to marital or parental status.
( b ) *Financial aid established by certain legal instruments.* ( 1 ) A recipient may administer or assist in the administration of scholarships, fellowships, or other forms of financial assistance established pursuant to domestic or foreign wills, trusts, bequests, or similar legal instruments or by acts of a foreign government that require that awards be made to members of a particular sex specified therein; *Provided,* that the overall effect of the award of such sex-restricted scholarships, fellowships, and other forms of financial assistance does not discriminate on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) To ensure nondiscriminatory awards of assistance as required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, recipients shall develop and use procedures under which: ( i ) Students are selected for award of financial assistance on the basis of nondiscriminatory criteria and not on the basis of availability of funds restricted to members of a particular sex;
( ii ) An appropriate sex-restricted scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance is allocated to each student selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section; and
( iii ) No student is denied the award for which he or she was selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section because of the absence of a scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance designated for a member of that student's sex.
( c ) *Athletic scholarships.* ( 1 ) To the extent that a recipient awards athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid, it must provide reasonable opportunities for such awards for members of each sex in proportion to the number of students of each sex participating in interscholastic or intercollegiate athletics.
( 2 ) A recipient may provide separate athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid for members of each sex as part of separate athletic teams for members of each sex to the extent consistent with this paragraph (c) and § 113.450.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          29,230
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               237,300
<PP&E>                                          73,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,186,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,685
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,696
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,094,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,186,182
<SALES>                                         67,340
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,233
<CGS>                                           46,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,844
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,244
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 31,050
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,294
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .055
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .055


</TABLE>
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Tuzigoot
National Monument
Arizona


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  For Kids
 tuzi badgeBe a Junior Ranger!
The Junior Ranger program is available at National Park Service sites across the country. Tuzigoot National Monument's Junior Ranger program is a booklet of fun activities that focus on archeology, preservation, and ways of understanding our past and our present. The program is available at the Visitor Center or you can download it here and complete it when you visit.

patch2Be an Arizona Explorer!

Junior Rangers have the opportunity to explore the whole state of Arizona by completing the Arizona Explorer junior ranger book. The workbook has information and activities about each National Park Service site in Arizona. You can pick up the workbook at the Tuzigoot visitor center, or you can download it here.

Be a Scout Ranger!
There are programs available for both Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts at NPS sites across the country, which are typically focused on resource stewardship and park management. If you're interested in doing the work for the Scout Ranger badge at Tuzigoot, please take a look at those Scout Ranger websites for the requirements, then give us a call and we'll set something up!

Tuzigoot Kids & Youth Activities
Sort By:RelevanceRecently UpdatedDate ReleasedTitle
Show1040 per page
Loading results...
Tags:
yoga
 Last updated: September 29, 2021
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: P.O. Box 219
Camp Verde,
AZ
86322
 Phone: 928-634-5564 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
~ United States Department of the Interior 

BURl·,\ U Of- RH I \ \ I\l 10\ 

2300 (.\>t:age \\ d) 

<;,:·,cr,1111.:nt,1. l \ 95~2:i I~<J., 

CGB-3400 

2.2,4.22 HOV 1 7 202Z 

To: All Central Valley Project Water Contractors 

Subject Statement of Central Valley Project (CVP) Cumulative lrngat1on and Municipal and 

lndu'it11al (M&I) Operation!i. for the F1s<.: al Year (FY) ending September 30. 2021 

Dear Water Contractor 

Enclosed are your annual statements of account for your CVP lmgatton and M&I water service 

contracts, as ofSeptember 30. 2021 

Information contained in the annual statements is as follows: 

a. Construction and deficit balances as of September 30, 2021, including payments applied in 

the current period. 

• Current Construction balances take into account the final cost allocat10n study which 

was finalized in January 2020. 

• Construction balances will reflect payments made to the United States per Section 

4011 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act if applicable. 

b. Trinity Public Utility District Assessment over or underpayments for October I, 2013 

through September 30, 2021. Smee this amount 1s still subject to reconciliations, 

Reclamation may refund 60 percent of overpayments per contractor request 1f the 

overpayment identified on the statement is over $1,000. If you would like to request a 

refund, please make your request to Kristin Johnson Overpayments that are under S 1,000 on 

the statement, are to be applied to future TPUD assessments. 

The enclosed statements are provided for informational purposes only and are not a bill 

Voluntary payments can be made to pay offall or a portion of your construction costs or 

deficit(s) pursuant to the Voluntary Payment Policy. The Voluntary Payment Policy can be 

found on Reclamation's website at http://www.usbr.gov/mp/cvp/laws.html. Voluntary payments 

can be sent with a copy of this analysis to: 

Bureau of Reclamation 

California-Great Basin 

PO Box 6200-24 

Portland, OR 97228-6200 

INTERIOR REGION 10 • l.ALHORN IA CRLAl BASJN 

C \I !FORN!A• Nf\'\DA' 0[:.h.,P'-! 
If)uu ha\<;' am· qu<;'~lI0Ih or ns;>s:d acld1t1011<1I in fon11a11un. pica,,: cunt,11.:t ~ lh l\.n-;t1n John;:;on by 

Clllml at kjolrn-;on a u~br.go\ orb:- phon~ at 916-978-5507. l"o1 TTY ,1ccc,, l'all the l\ :dcral 

Rcla:- Scn·icc at X00-877-8339. 

WILLIAMS Da:e 20 22 11 03 

09 Ji oa -oa·oo· 

Ann Lubas-\Villiam-; 

I 'i na nl·ia I I'\ I.111 a~c1
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D22-253

_____________________________

TONY BARBER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

Robert R. Wheeler, Judge.

September 21, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See § 921.0024 (2), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“If the lowest 

permissible sentence under the [Criminal Punishment Code]

exceeds the statutory maximum sentence as provided in 

s. 775.082, the sentence required by the code must be imposed.”); 

see also State v. Gabriel, 314 So. 3d 1243, 1252 (Fla. 2021). 

ROWE, C.J., and BILBREY and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Tony Barber, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 14.1

                                 Code of Ethics

Conflicts of Interest Policy Overview

China Digital Communication Group ("CHID") recognizes and respects that officers
and employees may take part in legitimate financial, business and other
activities outside their jobs. However, those activities must be lawful and free
of conflicts with their responsibilities as CHID employees.


Employees must not misuse CHID resources or discredit CHID's name and
reputation. The effectiveness of this policy depends on the cooperation of all
employees in disclosing any situations that may be contrary to the intent of the
policy and the ethical standards that it expresses.


Core Ethical Requirements:

o        Disclose outside activities, financial interests or relationships that
         may present a possible conflict of interest or the appearance of a
         conflict. Make your disclosures in writing to your supervisor as well
         as to company legal counsel. When in doubt as to whether a possible
         conflict of interest exists, err on the side of disclosure.

o        In addition to complying with the law and CHID policies, exercise your
         own good judgment in all personal and business dealings outside your
         CHID job.

o        Avoid actions or relationships which might conflict or appear to
         conflict with your job responsibilities or the interests of CHID.

o        Do not misuse CHID resources, intellectual property, time or facilities
         (including office equipment, e-mail, and computer applications).

o        Obtain necessary approvals before accepting any position as an officer
         or director of an outside business concern.

What CHID Officers and Employees Are Urged To Watch For:

o        Holding a financial interest in a company where you could personally
         affect CHID's business with that company.

o        Taking a part-time job where you may be tempted to spend time on that
         job during your normal CHID working hours or to use CHID equipment or
         materials.

o        Receiving gifts of greater than nominal value from suppliers, customers
         or competitors while you are in a position to influence CHID decisions
         that might affect or appear to affect the outside concern.

o        Receiving personal discounts or other benefits from suppliers, service
         providers or customers not available to the general public or similarly
         situated CHID employees.

o        Directing business to a supplier that is owned or managed by a relative
         or close friend.

o        Misusing CHID resources, your position or influence to promote or
         assist an outside business or not-for-profit activity.

                                       39
<PAGE>

o        Preferential hiring of, direct supervision of, or making a promotion
         decision about a spouse, relative or close personal friend.

o        A romantic or other personal relationship that may create a conflict of
         interest with the employee's CHID responsibilities or compromise
         company interests


                                       40
<PAGE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Richard Tobias, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CV1903123.

Vs. No. 11-19-00247-CV * June 24, 2021

SLP Brownwood LLC d/b/a * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

Cross Country Healthcare Center, (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

the Owners of SLP Management, Inc., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

and Dr. N. Nigalye,

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of 

this appeal are taxed against Richard Tobias.
#### Earl Snyder, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Buffalo and Lake Erie Traction Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
EPA Reg. No

. 7 5095

- 2

Vol. 1 part 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. W. A. Realty Corporation, Respondent, against Harry B. Chambers et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Appellants. [67-73 W. 44th St. and 1140-1144 Avenue of the Americas, Borough of Manhattan.]

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the assessment of the Tax Commission reinstated and confirmed on the ground that the evidence supports the values fixed by the Tax Commission for the year involved. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 1031.]
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Williams Coal Seam Gas
Royalty Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as
the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its
knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Trust.

                                  BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR
                                  WILLIAMS COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUST


November 13, 2003                 By: /s/ RON E. HOOPER
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Ron E. Hooper,
                                      Senior Vice President, Royalty Management
                                      Bank of America, N.A.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust and will be retained by
Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       25
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Full Compliance, LLC and Zamora 

& Hernandez, PLLC, Plaintiffs,

v.

Amerant Bank, N.A. and others, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-22339-Civ-Scola

Order Granting Motion to Stay

Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ and Moving Defendants’ motion to stay 

the case pending a ruling from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

(“JPML”) (ECF No. 30). 

Only one Defendant Valley National Bank opposes the relief sought in the

motion because it prefers to avoid the Multi-District Litigation proceedings. But 

it is not for this Court to decide whether or not this matter will be transferred to 

the JPML. Instead, the JPML will render a decision on the possible transfer. A

stay pending this decision will conserve judicial resources and avoid duplicating 

work, as this Court may not be tasked with resolving all pretrial matters. See 

Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936) (the court’s “power to stay 

proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the 

disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, 

for counsel, and for litigants”). Moreover, the stay is likely to be brief because a

hearing on the motion to transfer took place on July 30, 2020 and a decision 

from the JPML is not expected to take long. Therefore, the Court grants the 

parties’ joint motion to stay (ECF No. 30). The Clerk is directed to 

administratively close this case and all pending motions are denied as moot. 

The Court further orders as follows:

• If the JPML denies transfer of this case, the parties must immediately file 

a notice in this case notifying the Court of the panel’s decision.

• The Defendants will have 30 days from the JPML’s ruling to respond to the 

operative complaint in this case.

Case 1:20-cv-22339-RNS Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 1 of 2
Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, on August 5, 2020.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-22339-RNS Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 2 of 2