alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

The Board of Directors
LSB Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-65438) of LSB Corporation of our report dated March 11, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of LSB Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which
report is incorporated by reference into the December 31, 2003 annual report on
Form 10-K of LSB Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLPKPMG LLPBoston, Massachusetts
March 25, 2004
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Weber, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-4225.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an
advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of De cisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O . 2019-O HIO -4225
T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLEE , v . W EBER , A PPELLANT . [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Weber, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-4225.] Certification of conflict dismissed as having been improvidently certified

. (No. 2018-1670

― Submitted October 2, 2019

― Decided October 21, 2019.)
C ERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Fairfield County, No. 17-CA-36, 2018-Ohio-3174.

_________________ {¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dism issed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and K ENNEDY , F RENCH , F ISCHER , D E W INE , D ONNELLY , and K LATT , JJ., concur.
W ILLIAM J. K LATT , J., of the Tenth District Court of Appeals, sitting for
S TEWART , J.

_________________ Thomas R. Elwing, for appellant.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 _________________
### §7624. Reimbursement to State and local law enforcement agencies

#### (a) Authorization of reimbursement

Whenever a State or local law enforcement agency provides information to the Internal Revenue Service that substantially contributes to the recovery of Federal taxes imposed with respect to illegal drug-related activities (or money laundering in connection with such activities), such agency may be reimbursed by the Internal Revenue Service for costs incurred in the investigation (including but not limited to reasonable expenses, per diem, salary, and overtime) not to exceed 10 percent of the sum recovered.

#### (b) Records; 10 percent limitation

The Internal Revenue Service shall maintain records of the receipt of information from a contributing agency and shall notify the agency when monies have been recovered as the result of such information. Following such notification, the agency shall submit a statement detailing the investigative costs it incurred. Where more than 1 State or local agency has given information that substantially contributes to the recovery of Federal taxes, the Internal Revenue Service shall equitably allocate investigative costs among such agencies not to exceed an aggregate amount of 10 percent of the taxes recovered.

#### (c) No reimbursement where duplicative

No State or local agency may receive reimbursement under this section if reimbursement has been received by such agency under a Federal or State forfeiture program or under State revenue laws.

(Added Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7602(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4507.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to information first provided more than 90 days after Nov. 18, 1988, see section 7602(e) of Pub. L. 100–690, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 6103 of this title.

#### Regulations

Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7602(g), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4508, provided that: "The Secretary of the Treasury shall, not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 18, 1988], prescribe such rules and regulations as shall be necessary and proper to carry out the provisions of this section [enacting section 7624 of this title, amending sections 6103 and 7809 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 6103 and 7809 of this title], including regulations relating to the definition of information which substantially contributes to the recovery of Federal taxes and the substantiation of expenses required in order to receive a reimbursement."
National Park Service

U.S. Department of the Interior

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve

Rambler Mine Trail

Access: Trailhead is located at the end of the maintained portion of 

the Nabesna Road, mile 42. As you near the end of the maintained 

portion of the Nabesna Road, you will reach private property owned 

by the Ellis family. Please respect their privacy and take care not to 

park on their property or private air strip. Continue driving on the 

road through the Ellis property. Approximately a 1000 ft beyond the 

Ellis property, there is a gravel parking area. This is the best place to 

park your car. 

Distance: Approximately 1.5 miles round-trip 

Time: 11⁄2 to 2 hours, depending on whether or not you explore the route.

Maps: USGS Maps-Nabesna 1:250,000; Nabesna 1:63,360 (B-4), (B-5)

Difficulty: Moderate, but short. Approximately 400’ elevation gain within 1⁄2 mile distance.

Highlights: Historic mine buildings, artifacts, and great scenery, Dall sheep viewing.

Route: After parking your car, walk in the same direction down the historic mining road (the nonmaintained portion of the Nabesna Road). Follow this level route for approximately 1/3 mile from the 

parking area, and turn right onto the tree-canopied trail. At this junction, keen observation will provide a 

glimpse of the Rambler Mine, which extracted gold in the early 1940’s, perched high on the side of White 

Mountain. After turning right onto the trail, you will begin a steady, uphill 1/2 mile ascent through a 

predominately spruce and alder forest. After reaching the mine, you may continue on the route upwards 

for further views. This route is not maintained and may not be readily visible.

Hazards: The mine opening and tunnels, surrounding buildings, and other structures are in a state of 

disrepair and hazardous. Caution is advised.

Notes: Take standard precautions for travel in bear country. There is no water available along this route. 

Rambler Mine and other historic sites in Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve are part of the rich 

history of the region. Destruction of historic buildings and/or removal of artifacts is prohibited. 

EXPERIENCE YOUR AMERICATM Revised 3/2015
EXPERIENCE YOUR AMERICATM

Rambler Mine Trail & Route

Rambler Mine Trailhead

 1.5 miles round-trip

END of Nabesna Road. 

Trail unmaintained beyond this point. 

Please respect private property.

Rambler Mine Route

Trail is not maintained and may 

not be visible.

Parking Area

mile 42

E

Private 

Airstrip

N

To Slana
IN REPLY 

 REFER TO:

United States Department of the Interior

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 

Mid-Pacific Regional Office 

2800 Cottage Way 

Sacramento, California 95825-1898

MP-3400 October 1, 2003 

WTR-4.00 

Subject: Statement of Central Valley Project (CVP) Cumulative Municipal and Industrial 

Operations for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2002 

Dear Water Contractor: 

Enclosed is a statement of the cumulative financial results of operations applicable to your CVP 

Municipal and Industrial water service contract as of September 30, 2002. This statement is 

provided for informational purposes and is not a bill. 

The statement shows the beginning cumulative balances from the prior fiscal year, the current 

fiscal year results of operations, the ending capital repayment and deficit balances, as applicable, 

as of September 30, 2002. The statement reflects interest accrued and voluntary payments 

through fiscal year 2002.

As indicated above, the enclosed statement is provided for informational purposes only and is 

not a bill. However, if you wish to voluntarily reimburse the Bureau of Reclamation for all or a 

portion of your deficit(s), if any, please contact Ms. Masako Altman at 916-978-5365 to 

determine the appropriate payoff amount. Such payments should be remitted to the Bureau of 

Reclamation, File No. 11546, P.O. Box 60000, San Francisco, CA 94160-1546. A copy of the 

documents supporting the payment should also be sent to the attention of Ms. Altman at the 

Bureau of Reclamation’s Mid-Pacific Regional Office, 2800 Cottage Way – MP-3400, 

Sacramento, CA 95825-1898. Please state that the payment is to be applied to your deficit 

account on your transmittal and remittance. 

Any questions concerning the foregoing should be addressed to Ms. Altman at the above 

address, at 916-978-5365, TDD 916-978-5608 or maltman@mp.usbr.gov. 

 Sincerely, 

 Lawrence J. Bauman 

 Manager, Ratesetting Services 

 Business Resources Center 

Enclosure 

cc: 
Subject: Statement of Central Valley Project Cumulative Municipal and Industrial 

Operations Ending Fiscal Year September 30, 2002 

2

Central Valley Project Water Association 

Attn: George Senn 

1521 AI@ Street 

Sacramento CA 95814 

Tehama Colusa Canal Authority 

Attn: Michael Hagman 

PO Box 1025 

Willows CA 95988 

San Luis and Delta Mendota Water Authority 

Attn: Tona Mederios 

PO Box 2157 

Los Banos CA 93635 

Friant Water Users Authority 

Attn: Ron Jacobsma 

854 North Harvard Ave 

Lindsay CA 93247 

 (All without Encl.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000895095
<NAME> MATHSOFT, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,561,572
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,579,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    551,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,154,886
<PP&E>                                       5,834,956
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,252,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,239,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,679,807
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        86,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,418,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,239,105
<SALES>                                      3,924,406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,526,277
<CGS>                                          783,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  974,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,041,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (450,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (465,090)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (465,090)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
(No. 649

Claimant awarded $25.00)

#### Atlas Mills (Corp.), Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 15, 1924.*

Pure food *act*— when *moneys paid under may he refunded.*When moneys have been paid to the State, that claimant was not required by law to pay, a refund of the amount paid will be awarded.

Atlas Mills, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim filed by the Atlas Mills, claimant, against the State of Illinois, setting forth that the Atlas Mills has paid into the state treasury of the State, of Illinois through the Department of Agriculture the sum of $25.00 under the erroneous impression that said claimant was obliged to make this payment under the Pure Pood Law; that under the laws of the State of Illinois said claimant was not obliged to pay said amount for the reason that the commodities sold by said Atlas Mills, claimant, was a pure wheat middling and that no amount was required to be paid by the claimant to the State.

The Department of Agriculture admits that the above payment was made and that the same was turned over to the State Treasurer.

The Attorney General filed a statement consenting to an award of $25.00.

The court therefore awards the claimant the sum of $25.00.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-80971-RAR

LINDA PACE, individually, and 

on behalf of other similarly situated 

current and former employees,

Plaintiff,

v.

ACADIA HEALTHCARE COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT 

AGREEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Approve Settlement 

and Dismiss with Prejudice [ECF No. 36] (“Joint Motion”) and Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for 

Attorney’s Fees [ECF No. 37]. Before the Court can approve a settlement of FLSA claims, it must

scrutinize the settlement and determine that it is a “fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide

dispute over FLSA provisions.” Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1355

(11th Cir. 1982). If the settlement reflects a reasonable compromise over FLSA issues that are

actually in dispute, the Court may approve the settlement “to promote the policy of encouraging

settlement in litigation.” Lynn’s Food Stores, 679 F.2d at 1354. Upon review of the record and 

the parties’ documented basis for settlement of this FLSA case, including an award of attorney’s

fees to Plaintiff’s counsel, the Court finds that the settlement of this action is fair and reasonable. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Joint Motion [ECF No. 36] is GRANTED.

Case 9:20-cv-80971-RAR Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2020 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The Settlement Agreement [ECF No. 36-1], which has been duly filed as a record of 

the Court, is APPROVED in its entirety.

3. Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees [ECF No. 37] is GRANTED. 

Plaintiff’s counsel is awarded $6,793.00 in attorney’s fees and costs.

4. The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and any pending motions are 

DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 9th day of December, 2020.

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:20-cv-80971-RAR Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2020 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-60196 Conference Calendar

CHARLIE WEST SCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:01-CV-72-RG

-------------------- February 20, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Charlie West Scott, now federal prisoner #02199-043, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition raising a challenge pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), to his conviction and sentence for conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine base, possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine base, and possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine base within 1,000 feet of a school. Scott argues that he is entitled toNo. 02-60196 -2- raise Apprendi claims in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, that the drug quantity should have been alleged in his indictment, and that the issue of drug quantity should have been submitted to the jury, who could not have found him responsible for the quantity of drugs attributed to him at sentencing. Under the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition that attacks custody resulting from a federal sentence may be entertained only if the petitioner establishes that the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 remedy is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255; Tolliver v. Dobre , 211 F.3d 876, 878 (5th Cir. 2000) . The savings clause applies to a claim “(i) that is based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes that the petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense and (ii) that was foreclosed by circuit law at the time when the claim should have been raised in the petitioner’s trial, appeal, or first § 2255 motion.” Reyes-Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Because Apprendi is not retroactively applicable on collateral review, Scott’s Apprendi claims do not satisfy the requirements of the savings clause and thus cannot be raised in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. See Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont, Tx. , 305 F.3d 343, 347 (5th Cir. 2002).

AFFIRMED.
§ 6.55 Terms of licenses or sublicenses. ( a ) No license or sublicense shall be granted under any patent in which the Secretary of the Interior has transferable interests, except as set forth under these regulations, the terms and conditions of which shall be expressly stated in such license and sublicense. The terms of licenses and sublicenses issued under this subpart shall not be unreasonably restrictive.
( b ) To the extent that they do not conflict with any restrictions to which the licensing or sublicensing of Class B patents and unpatented inventions may be subject, all licenses and sublicenses relating to Class A and Class B patents and unpatented inventions shall be subject to the following terms and provisions, and to such other terms and conditions as the Solicitor may prescribe: ( 1 ) The acceptance of a license or sublicense shall not be construed as a waiver of the right to contest the validity of the patent. A license or sublicense shall be revocable only upon a finding by the Solicitor of the Department that the terms of the license or sublicense have been violated and that the revocation of the license or sublicense is in the public interest. Such finding shall be made only after reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard.
( 2 ) Licenses and sublicenses shall be nontransferable. Upon a satisfactory showing that the Government or public will be benefited thereby, they may be granted to properly qualified applicants royalty-free. If no such showing is made, they shall be granted only upon a reasonable royalty or other consideration, the amount or character of which is to be determined by the Solicitor. A cross-licensing agreement may be considered adequate consideration.
( 3 ) Licensees and sublicensees may be required to submit annual or more frequent technical or statistical reports concerning practical experience acquired through the exercise of the license or sublicense, the extent of the production under the license or sublicense, and other related subjects.
( 4 ) A licensee or sublicensee manufacturing a patented article pursuant to a license or sublicense shall give notice to the public that the article is patented by affixing thereon the word “patent”, together with the number of the patent, or when, from the character of the article, this cannot be done, by fixing to it, or to the package in which it is enclosed, a label containing such notice.
( c ) Licenses and sublicenses relating to Class C patents and patent rights shall be granted upon such terms and conditions as may be prescribed pursuant to sections 3 and 5 of the Act of April 5 1944, and any amendments thereof.
[29 FR 260, Jan. 10, 1964, as amended at 31 FR 10796, Aug. 13, 1966]
Exhibit 4.402

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 181215 dated May 26, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Telematic services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until May 26, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated March 02, 2020 No. 89-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal: 
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS 
   COMMUNICATIONS 
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION 
   IN THE SPHERE 
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION 
   TECHNOLOGY
  AND MASS MEDIA 
   PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 118285
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hike the Tree Molds Trail

Craters Of The Moon National Monument & Preserve
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.601 SBA Secondary Market.

The SBA secondary market (“Secondary Market”) consists of the sale of Certificates, representing either a fractional undivided interest in some or all of the guaranteed portion of an individual 7(a) guaranteed loan or a fractional undivided interest in a Pool consisting of the SBA guaranteed portions of a number of 7(a) guaranteed loans. Transactions involving interests in Pools or the sale of individual guaranteed portions of loans are governed by the contracts entered into by the parties, SBA's Secondary Market Program Guide, and this subpart. See sections 5(f), (g), and (h) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 634(f), (g), and (h)).

[76 FR 63546, Oct. 12, 2011]