alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

I Meddelanden

Kommissionen

----

GEMENSAMMA SORTLISTAN ÖVER ARTER AV LANTBRUKSVÄXTER

sjätte tillägget till den 23:e fullständiga utgåvan

(2005/C 334 A/01)

INNEHOLLSFÖRTECKNING

Beskrivning

Lista över lantbruksväxter

----

BESKRIVNING

----

(1)EUT C 46 A, 22.2.2005, s. 1. Gemensamma sortlistan senast ändrad genom femte tillägget (EUT C 196 A, 11.8.2005, s. 1).

(2)EGT L 193, 20.7.2002, s. 1. Direktivet senast ändrat genom Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EG) nr 1829/2003 (EUT L 268, 18.10.2003, s. 1).

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

2.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

3.AGROSTIS CANINA L.

4.AGROSTIS GIGANTEA ROTH.

5.AGROSTIS STOLONIFERA L.

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

19.LOLIUM × BOUCHEANUM KUNTH

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

48.VICIA SATIVA L.

51.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. ACEPHALA (DC.) ALEF. VAR. MEDULLOSA THELL. + VAR. VIRIDIS L.

III

56.BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERNJ ET COSSON

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

59.CANNABIS SATIVA L.

62.GOSSYPIUM SPP.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

64.LINUM USITATISSIMUM L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

70.ORYZA SATIVA L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 34

**Question 34:** What are the applicable radiation limits in a controlled area if the licensee does not allow members of the public to enter the area?

**Answer:** Occupational dose limits apply to individuals who receive an "occupational dose" in a "controlled area." (See definitions of "occupational dose" and "controlled area" in 10 CFR 20.1003.)

(References: 10 CFR 20.1003, 10 CFR 20.1201)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 2:20-cv-14207-DMM Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:20-cv-14207-DMM Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020 Page 2 of 2
### [§§2281, 2282. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–381, §§1, 2, Aug. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 1119]

Section 2281, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 968, provided that an interlocutory or permanent injunction restraining the enforcement, operation or execution of a State statute on grounds of unconstitutionality should not be granted unless the application has been heard and determined by a three-judge district court.

Section 2282, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 968, provided that an interlocutory or permanent injunction restraining the enforcement, operation or execution of any Act of Congress on grounds of unconstitutionality should not be granted unless the application therefor has been heard and determined by a three-judge district court.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal not applicable to any action commenced on or before Aug. 12, 1976, see section 7 of Pub. L. 94–381 set out as an Effective Date of 1976 Amendment note under section 2284 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 126

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 126.401 What is a program examination?

A program examination is an investigation by SBA officials, which verifies the accuracy of any certification made or information provided as part of the HUBZone application or recertification process. Examiners may verify that the concern met the program's eligibility requirements at the time of its certification or, if applicable, at the time of its most recent recertification.

[84 FR 65244, Nov. 26, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4925 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4925

 To preserve the readiness of the Armed Forces by limiting separations 
 based on COVID-19 vaccination status and continuing pay and benefits 
   for members while religious and health accommodations are pending.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2022

  Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Braun, Mr. Hoeven, and 
 Mrs. Hyde-Smith) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
            and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To preserve the readiness of the Armed Forces by limiting separations 
 based on COVID-19 vaccination status and continuing pay and benefits 
   for members while religious and health accommodations are pending.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving the Readiness of our 
Armed Forces Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. ACCESS TO PAY AND BENEFITS FOR MEMBERS OF NATIONAL GUARD AND 
              RESERVE COMPONENTS WHILE REQUESTS FOR RELIGIOUS AND 
              HEALTH ACCOMMODATIONS ARE PENDING.

    A member of the National Guard or another reserve component of the 
Armed Forces shall maintain access to pay and benefits while a request 
of the member for a religious or health accommodation is pending.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION OF MEMBERS OF ARMED FORCES 
              BASED ON COVID-19 VACCINATION STATUS.

    A member of an active or reserve component of the Armed Forces may 
not be involuntarily separated from the Armed Forces based solely on 
the vaccination status of the member with respect to COVID-19 until the 
Armed Forces have achieved the end strengths authorized under the most 
recent Act authorizing appropriations for military activities of the 
Department of Defense.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEvaluation of speech recognizers for use in advanced combat helicopter crew station research and developmentThe U.S. Army Crew Station Research and Development Facility uses vintage 1984 speech recognizers. An evaluation was performed of newer off-the-shelf speech recognition devices to determine whether newer technology performance and capabilities are substantially better than that of the Army's current speech recognizers. The Phonetic Discrimination (PD-100) Test was used to compare recognizer performance in two ambient noise conditions: quiet office and helicopter noise. Test tokens were spoken by males and females and in isolated-word and connected-work mode. Better overall recognition accuracy was obtained from the newer recognizers. Recognizer capabilities needed to support the development of human factors design requirements for speech command systems in advanced combat helicopters are listed.Document ID19900014949Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSimpson, Carol A.*(Psycho-Linguistic Research Associates Woodside, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberUSAAVSCOM-TM-90-A-001NAS 1.26:177547A-90090NASA-CR-177547Accession Number90N24265Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS2-12425PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-51Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014949.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Samuel Schwartzman, Respondent, v. J. Edward Jetter, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Guidance - Use of NRC Form 4 - Listing of Exposure Periods

## HPPOS-050 PDR-9111210219

See the Interpretive Guide in IE Manual entitled as above and dated November 1, 1978. It provides guidance on the use of NRC Form 4 with respect to listing periods of exposure at different licensee's facilities while employed by another single employer who is not necessarily a licensee.

The health physics position was written in the context of 10 CFR 20.102, but it also applies to "new" 10 CFR 20.2104. The Westinghouse in-service inspection division inquired about the listing of periods of exposure on NRC Form 4 for radiation work conducted at many power plant facilities while employed only by Westinghouse. Westinghouse maintains their own Form 4's, recording the highest exposure received for each plant where work was conducted by comparing the facility badge results with their own.

One power plant licensee required a record of each period of exposure for each of the other facilities where inservice work was performed. This would have resulted in several pages for each Form 4 since as many as 30 or more facilities would be involved every six months per man.

Instead, Westinghouse requested that they be permitted to continue to add the cumulative exposures for each place where work was conducted and take the result to the facilities as one total exposure to be used as one entry for the Form 4.

On August 8, 1978, the views of OELD were requested on whether item 5 on NRC Form 4, "name and address of employer" [or item 7 on an up-to-date NRC Form 4 (6-92), "name of licensee or facility not licensed by NRC that provided monitoring"] means each employer or each separate facility where an exposure occurred.

In a written opinion, OELD stated that the term "employer" means just that. Thus, only one entry on the Form 4 is necessary for the exposures received during the time period for which the employer did not change. This view is consistent with the purpose of Form 4 which is to provide a licensee with a history of the individual's exposure. The circumstances of the previous exposures (i.e., numerous small exposures, a few large exposures, location, etc.) is irrelevant information to the licensee as such information is not necessary for the determination of the accumulated dose.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.102, 10 CFR 20.2104

**Subject codes:** 2.1, 8.1, 8.7

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, October 13, 2017
### [§972. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(120), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1784]

Section, Pub. L. 87–834, §12(a), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 1031, related to the consolidation of a group of export trade corporations for treatment as a single controlled foreign corporation for tax purposes.
SERVED: JULY 26, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

RADIO HOLLAND USA, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 0286 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on September 16 and 17,2013, inclusive, in the U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 7006, 

Casey U.S. Courthouse, 515 Rusk Avenue, Houston, TX 77002. Hearings will 

commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties should vacate 

the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s).1 Pleadings2 may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 "The public policy of favoring and encouraging settlement makes necessary the inadmissibility of 

settlement negotiations in order to foster frank discussions". (Fiberglass Insulators, Inc. v Dupuy, et al, 

(856 F. 2d 652,26 Fed. R. Evict. Serv. 1225, 1988. See also Coakley & Williams Construction, 

Incorporated v Structural Concrete Equipment, Incorporated, 973 F.2d 349, 1992; 2 McCormick on Evid. 

§266 (6th ed.); Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.). Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of 

Evidence " ... prohibits the admission of statements made in compromise negotiations ... " (In the Matter of 

Africa Air Corporation, FAA Order No. 99-5). "Rule 408's public policy purpose of encouraging frank 

settlement discussions is as compelling in FAA civil penalty proceedings as it is in Federal Trials. Hence, 

its guidance will be followed in these proceeds." (!d.) 2 Materials filed in the FMCSA Hearing Docket (except for materials filed in security cases) are also 

available for viewing at http://www.regulations.gov. 
FDMS No. FAA-2013-0286 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST-BY U.S. MAIL & FAX 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Jeanine Gotimer, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3272 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

Anacarolina Estaba, Respondent's Counsel 

Gardere Wynne Sewell, LLP 

1000 Louisiana, Suite 3400 

Houston, TX 77002-5011 

TEL: 713-276-5398 

FAX: 713-276-6398 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-3 66-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
### §129. West Virginia

West Virginia is divided into two judicial districts to be known as the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia.

### Northern District

(a) The Northern District comprises the counties of Barbour, Berkeley, Braxton, Brooke, Calhoun, Doddridge, Gilmer, Grant, Hampshire, Hancock, Hardy, Harrison, Jefferson, Lewis, Marion, Marshall, Mineral, Monongalia, Morgan, Ohio, Pendleton, Pleasants, Pocahontas, Preston, Randolph, Ritchie, Taylor, Tucker, Tyler, Upshur, Webster, and Wetzel.

Court for the Northern District shall be held at Clarksburg, Elkins, Fairmont, Martinsburg, and Wheeling.

### Southern District

(b) The Southern District comprises the counties of Boone, Cabell, Clay, Fayette, Greenbrier, Jackson, Kanawha, Lincoln, Logan, McDowell, Mason, Mercer, Mingo, Monroe, Nicholas, Putnam, Raleigh, Roane, Summers, Wayne, Wirt, Wood, and Wyoming.

Court for the Southern District shall be held at Beckley, Bluefield, Charleston, Huntington, Lewisburg, and Parkersburg.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 894; Pub. L. 97–471, §1, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2601.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §194 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §113, 36 Stat. 1129; Mar. 23, 1912, ch. 63, 37 Stat. 76; Aug. 22, 1914, ch. 265, 38 Stat. 702; Feb. 27, 1922, ch. 83, 42 Stat. 398; June 22, 1936, ch. 695, 49 Stat. 1805; Aug. 23, 1937, ch. 737, 50 Stat. 744; June 29, 1938, ch. 817, 52 Stat. 1245).

Words "with the waters thereof," after the list of counties in each district, were omitted as unnecessary, and in view of the absence of such words in similar sections relating to other States.

Provisions relating to special terms of court were omitted as covered by section 141 of this title.

A provision that the term at Fairmont be held "when suitable rooms and accommodations for holding terms of the court shall be furnished at Fairmont free of cost to the United States or until, subject to the recommendation of the Attorney General of the United States with respect to providing such rooms and accommodations for holding court at Fairmont, a Federal building containing such suitable rooms and accommodations for holding court shall be erected at such place," was omitted as obsolete on advice of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that Federal accommodations are now available.

Provisions respecting court accommodations at Beckley and Lewisburg were omitted as covered by section 142 of this title.

Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–471, §1(1), struck out references to Parkersburg, Wirt, and Wood counties and inserted references to Braxton, Pocahontas, and Webster counties.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–471, §1(2), struck out references to Braxton, Pocahontas, and Webster counties and inserted references to Parkersburg, Wirt, and Wood counties.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.1705 Pool formation requirements. ( a ) *Initiation of Pool formation.* Only an entity approved by SBA to be a Pool Originator under the Program that continues to qualify to be a Pool Originator pursuant to this subpart may initiate the formation of a Pool. The Pool Originator creates the Pool subject to Program Rules and Regulations, including the parameters set forth in the Guide, and SBA approval.
( b ) *Adjustment of Pool requirements.* SBA may adjust the Pool characteristics periodically based on program experience and market conditions and will publish a revised version of the Guide in the Federal Register to implement such adjustments. Any such adjustments shall not affect Pools formed prior to the adjustment.
( c ) *When the Pool Originator is the Seller.* When a Pool Originator proposes to form a Pool involving a Pool Loan it owns, it must execute the First Lien Position 504 Loan Pool Guarantee Agreement as Pool Originator and as Seller and, consequently, will be subject to all applicable Program Rules and Regulations pertaining to both roles.
( d ) *When the Pool Originator does not own the Pool Loan.* When a Pool Originator proposes to form a Pool involving a Pool Loan it does not own, it must purchase the Loan Interest it proposes to pool from a Seller that owns the whole Pool Loan and that has the servicing rights. The Pool Originator must purchase the Loan Interest and take it into inventory or settle the purchase of the Loan Interest through the CSA concurrently with the formation of the Pool. The entity selling the Loan Interest to the Pool Originator must execute the First Lien Position 504 Loan Pool Guarantee Agreement as Seller and, consequently, will be subject to all applicable Program Rules and Regulations pertaining to a Seller. The Pool Originator must also execute the First Lien Position 504 Loan Pool Guaranty Agreement.
( e ) *What CSA must receive prior to Pool formation.* Before the CSA may carry out its responsibilities relating to the formation of a Pool, it must receive: ( 1 ) From the Pool Originator: A properly completed First Lien Position 504 Loan Pool application form, First Lien Position 504 Loan Guarantee Agreement, and any other documentation which SBA may require, if applicable; and
( 2 ) All cost reimbursement due and payable to the CSA prior to Pool formation owed by the Participants participating in the formation of the Pool.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Washita Battlefield
National Historic SiteOklahoma
Editorial Note on Part 121
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 121.110 What must a concern do in order to be identified as a small business concern in any Federal procurement databases? ( a ) In order to be identified as a small business concern in the System for Award Management (SAM) database (or any successor thereto), a concern must certify its size in connection with specific size standards at least annually.
( b ) If a firm identified as a small business concern in SAM fails to certify its size within one year of a size certification, the firm will not be listed as a small business concern in SAM, unless and until the firm recertifies its size.
[78 FR 38817, June 28, 2013. Redesignated at 80 FR 7536, Feb. 11, 2015]