alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### [§§4581, 4582. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–456, title III, §302(d), May 24, 1962, 76 Stat. 77]

Sections, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 544, imposed a tax on imports of any article, merchandise, or combination (except oils specified in section 4511), 10 percent or more of the quantity by weight of which consists of, or is derived directly or indirectly from, one or more of the products specified in sections 4561 and 4571, or of the oils, fatty acids, or salts specified in section 4511.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after Aug. 31, 1963, see section 501(a) of Pub. L. 87–456, title V, May 24, 1962, 76 Stat. 78.
### TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM: Patrick Goodwin , ERG
DATE: September 30 , 2015
SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the National Scale Immediate

Receiving Water Model [ DCN SE 04569 ]
This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the National Scale Immediate Receiving Water (IRW) Model , developed as part of the Environmental Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA

- 821

- R

- 15

- 006 (DCN SE04527) . The supporting documentation for this model includes the files listed in Table 1.
Ta ble 1. Supporting Documentation

Attachment ID Document Name Brief Description

A1 Attachment 1: CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Water Quality Module

- Comparison Database

- Option A (CPP)

- DCN SE04569A1 CBI_Database used to compare the water quality module results between baseline and Option A. Generates inputs for the Water Quality Module Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A2 Attachment 2 : CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Water Q uality Module

- Comparison Database

- Option B (CPP)

- DCN SE04569A2 CBI_Database used to compare the water quality module results between baseline and Option B. Generates inputs for the Water Quality Module Summary Table Generator. This version accounts fo r the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A3 Attachment 3 : CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Water Quality Module

- Comparison Database

- Option C (CPP)

- DCN SE04569A3 CBI_Database used to compare the water quality module results between baseline and Option C. Generates inputs for the Wa ter Quality Module Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A4 Attachment 4 : CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Water Quality Module

- Comparison Database

- Option D (CPP)

- DCN SE04569A4 CBI_Database used to compare the water quality module results between baseline and Option D. Generates inputs for the Water Quality Module Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.

A 5 Attachment 5 : CBI_Final Steam EA IRW

Model

- Water Quality Module

- Comparison Database

- Option E (CPP)

- DCN SE04569A5 CBI_Database used to compare the water quality module results between baseline and Option E. Generates inputs for the Water Quality Mo dule Summary Table Generator. This version accounts for the CCR and CPP rulemakings.
### §2463. Property taken under revenue law not repleviable

All property taken or detained under any revenue law of the United States shall not be repleviable, but shall be deemed to be in the custody of the law and subject only to the orders and decrees of the courts of the United States having jurisdiction thereof.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 974.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §747 (R.S. §934).

Changes were made in phraseology.
### §3005. Application of chapter to judgments

This chapter shall not apply with respect to a judgment on a debt if such judgment is entered more than 10 years before the effective date of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVI, §3611, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4936.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For effective date of this chapter, referred to in text, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3001 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Nov. 29, 1990, and applicable with respect to certain actions for debts owed the United States pending in court on that effective date, see section 3631 of Pub. L. 101–647, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Discover Frederick Douglass’s Home

Frederick Douglass National Historic Site, National Capital Parks-East
**EXHIBIT32.1**

CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection withthe Annual Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for thefiscal year ended April 30, 2007, as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc P. Flores, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Dated: July 25, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Marc P. Flores                     |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Marc P. Flores                         |
|                 |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
§ 6305.30 What are the steps BLM must take in issuing an access authorization to valid occupancies? ( a ) Before issuing an access authorization to mining claims or other valid occupancies wholly surrounded by wilderness, BLM will make certain that: ( 1 ) You have demonstrated a lack of any existing access rights or alternate routes of access available by deed or under applicable State or common law and that access by non-federally owned routes is not reasonably obtainable;
( 2 ) Your combination of routes and modes of travel, including non-motorized modes, will cause the least impact on the wilderness but, at the same time, will permit the reasonable use of the non-Federal land, valid mining claim, or other valid occupancy; and
( 3 ) The location, construction, maintenance, and use of the access route that BLM approves will be as consistent as possible with the management of the wilderness area.
( b ) After issuing an access authorization, BLM will make certain that you situate and build the route that BLM approves to minimize adverse impacts on the natural resource values of the wilderness area.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0946 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-CE-037-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Valley Forge
National Historical Park
Pennsylvania


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  History & Culture
 Valley Forge National Historical Park is nationally significant as the site of the 1777-78 winter encampment of the Continental Army under General George Washington. Few places evoke the spirit of patriotism and independence, represent individual and collective sacrifice, or demonstrate the resolve, tenacity and determination of the people of the United States to be free as well as Valley Forge.
The historic landscapes, structures, objects, and archeological and natural resources at Valley Forge are tangible links to one of the most defining events in our nation's history. Here the Continental Army under Washington's leadership emerged as a cohesive and disciplined fighting force. The Valley Forge experience is fundamental to both American history and American myth, and remains a source of inspiration for Americans and the world.

Soldiers in uniform and women wearing cloaks walk in front of a line of snow-covered log huts.What Happened at Valley Forge
Learn about the history and significance of Valley Forge.
The outside of a two level building with a sign that reads Visitor Center at Valley Forge.Places
Explore the park buildings, structures and monuments.
Gen. Washington with left hand on chin. People
Information on the people who served during the Valley Forge encampment.
1915 photograph from the archives of Valley Forge NHPValley Forge Archives
The archives consist of textual material, photographs several all formats, microfilm, audio/video materials, and maps, plans and drawings.
Cover Image of Administrative History BookAdministrative History of Valley Forge
An official National Park Service history of the park by Harlan Unrau.
Map Of Valley ForgeMuseum Collections
Explore various collections of pictures, books, documents, and artifacts.
 Last updated: May 20, 2024
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 1400 North Outer Line Drive
King of Prussia,
PA
19406
 Phone: 610 783-1000 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
### §471. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 471 was editorially reclassified as section 5115 of this title.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Contact Us
  Return to Previous Page
 Thing to Do
Hike to Trillium Falls
Redwood National and State Parks Best 1-hour walk in the Redwoods A Highly Recommended Walk For the Whole Family     parking for vehicles of any size Roosevelt elk
 Activity Fee
No
 Location
Trillium Falls Trail: Elk Meadow day-use area
 
 Season
Year Round
 Redwood National and State Parks Tags redwood national and state parks
forest
waterfalls
redwood
hike
walk
elk
nature
 Sort By:RelevanceRecently UpdatedDate ReleasedTitle
 Show1040 per page
   walking hike family activity redwood national and state parks redwoods walk
 Tags redwood national and state parks
forest
waterfalls
redwood
hike
walk
elk
nature
 Last updated: April 1, 2024


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22811]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission: 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on 
Thursday, November 18, 2004.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The 
purpose of the Commission is to assist Federal, State and local 
authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated 
resource management plan for those lands and waters within the 
Corridor.
    The meeting will convene on November 18, 2004 at 6 p.m. at The 
Edward J. Hayden Public Library located at the Monastery, 1464 Diamond 
Hill Road, Cumberland, RI for the following reasons:
    1. Approval of minutes.
    2. Chairman's report.
    3. Executive Director's report.
    4. Financial budget.
    5. Public Input.
    It is anticipated that about twenty-five people will be able to 
attend the session in addition to the Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the 
Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made 
prior to the meeting to: Michael Creasey, Executive Director, John H. 
Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, 
One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Michael Creasey, Executive Director of the Commission at the 
aforementioned address.

Michael Creasey,
Executive Director, BRVNHCC.
[FR Doc. 04-22811 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
Case 1:20-cv-22244-JEM Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 1 of 1
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Technical Assistance Request, Virginia Electric and Power Company, Response to 10 CFR 30.35

## HPPOS-312 PDR-9306250123

See the memorandum from J. E. Glenn to W. E. Cline dated February 4, 1991. 

This NMSS memo responds to a technical assistance request from Region II, dated January 25, 1991, concerning whether an electric utility that has complied with 10 CFR 50.75 must make the submission directed by 10 CFR 30.35 for its byproduct material license. Virginia Electric and Power Company's License No. 45-13670-04 authorizes up to 3 curies of any byproduct material for the transfer, possession and use incident to repair, maintenance and decontamination of reactor components and associated tools and equipment. The licensed material is authorized to be used at temporary job sites anywhere in the United States.

The licensee thought that decommissioning costs were bounded by normal operations and no additional financial assurance was required. NMSS and Low-Level Waste Management and Decommissioning (LLWM) disagreed with this position and cited a response to a request from Region I dated November 6, 1990 (enclosure) which advised:
        -  If the byproduct material license is for activities performed offsite, then the 10 CFR 30.35 financial assurance submission is required. 
        -  If the byproduct material license is for activities performed onsite, then the 10 CFR 30.35 financial assurance submission is not required, PROVIDED that the utility verifies that all decommissioning activities related to its materials license will be included in the 10 CFR Part 50 preliminary and final plant submittals. 

Since License No. 45-43670-04 authorizes the use of licensed material "Anywhere in the United States," the power company is required to make a financial assurance submission in accordance with 10 CFR 30.35.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 30.35

**Subject codes:** 5.8, 11.2

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40310 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VERNON EARL COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-97-CV-140 (L-95-CR-213-1)

- - - - - - - - - - November 13, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Vernon Earl Coleman, federal prisoner # 69727-079, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Coleman argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress his confession on the grounds that the law enforcement officers failed to scrupulously honor his invocation of his Fifth Amendment right to silence according to Michigan v. Mosley , 423 U.S. 96 (1975); that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call his girlfriend, Rhonda Reece, as a witness atNo. 98-40310 -2- the suppression hearing to testify about statements she heard the

law enforcement officers make about her facing prosecution unless Coleman confessed; and that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to appeal the district court’s application of the obstruction of justice sentencing guideline. The district court granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on the first issue but denied a COA on the two latter issues. If an appellant does not expressly request that the district court’s partial grant of COA be broadened to issues on which the district court denied COA, then this court will not consider those issues. Lackey v. Johnson , 116 F.3d 149, 151 (5th Cir. 1997). If, on the other hand, the appellant explicitly requests that the grant of COA be broadened to issues on which the district court denied COA, then this court may consider whether to grant COA on those issues. United States v. Kimler , 150 F.3d 429, 431 and n.1 (5th Cir. 1998). An implicit request by briefing the issues is not sufficient; this court requires a more express request. Id . at 431 n.1. Although Coleman has briefed the two issues for which the district court denied a COA, he has not expressly requested this court to grant a COA on those issues, either in his brief or in a separate motion for a COA. According to Lackey and Kimler , we may not consider these issues. Assuming arguendo that Coleman did sufficiently invoke his right to remain silent, and applying the Mosley factors, the record does not support Coleman’s argument that the lawNo. 98-40310 -3- enforcement officers did not honor his right to remain silent. Because the issue is legally meritless, Coleman’s counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the use of his confession on this ground. United States v. Wilkes , 20 F.3d 651, 653 (5th Cir. 1994). Because the record of the suppression hearing conclusively shows that Coleman is entitled to no relief, no evidentiary hearing was required. See United States v. Bartholomew , 974 F.2d 39, 41 (5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
23





CONSENT
OF AUDITORS TO INCORPORATE


FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INTO FORM S-8



















CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-105598 on Form S-8 pertaining to the AJS Bancorp, Inc. 2003 Stock Option
Plan and the 2003 Recognition and Retention Plan of our report dated March 22,
2010 incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AJS Bancorp,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Crowe Horwath LLPCrowe
Horwath LLP
 
 Oak
Brook, Illinois
 March 22,
2010
### §2250. Indigent petitioner entitled to documents without cost

If on any application for a writ of habeas corpus an order has been made permitting the petitioner to prosecute the application in forma pauperis, the clerk of any court of the United States shall furnish to the petitioner without cost certified copies of such documents or parts of the record on file in his office as may be required by order of the judge before whom the application is pending.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 966.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Derived from H.R. 4232, Seventy-ninth Congress, first session. It conforms to the prevailing practice.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 408

**Question 408:**

Background

10 CFR 20.2104 states that for each individual for whom monitoring is required, the licensee must: 1.) Determine the occupational radiation dose for the current year; and 2.) Attempt to obtain the records of lifetime cumulative occupational radiation dose. "Records of lifetime cumulative occupational radiation dose" refers to occupational dose records prior to the current year. These records are only used when implementing the planned special exposure option. Some licensees may use prior year's TEDE to control an individual's lifetime dose in compliance with NCRP-91 recommendations or average annual exposure in compliance with ICRP-60 recommendations. However, other prior year's dose quantities such as shallow dose equivalent (SDE) and lens (eye) dose equivalent (LDE) are not useful to licensees and provide no additional protection to individuals. Therefore, it was reasonable and compliant to obtain only TEDE for prior years. Can a licensee seek only to obtain the TEDE occupational dose quantity for prior years to comply with the 20.2104 (a) (2) requirement to "attempt to obtain the records of lifetime cumulative occupational radiation dose"?

**Answer:** Yes, provided the licensee does not intend to authorize planned special exposures for the individuals for whom the licensee attempts to obtain only the TEDE. For planned special exposures, the provisions of 10 CFR 20.1206 (e) that limit "lifetime" exposures apply to all occupational doses having annual limits in 10 CFR 20.1201 (a) (TEDE, organ dose, eye dose, skin dose and extremity dose), not just the TEDE. The reasons for this requirement other than for use in cases of planned special exposures are given in the answer to Question 142 (b).

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.2104)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, December 01, 2017