alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [FDA 225-04-4005]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the State of Illinois, Emergency Management Agency, Bureau of Radiation Safety and the Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.  The purpose of this MOU is to authorize the State of Illinois, through the Illinois Emergency Management Agency, to continue to conduct a State as certifiers program in Illinois under the Mammography Quality Standards Act as amended by the Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Act of 1998.

# DATES:

The agreement became effective August 18, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Joanne Choy, Division of Mammography Quality and Radiation Programs (HFZ-240), 1350 Piccard Dr., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-827-2903, or e-mail:                         *jkc@cdrh.fda.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which states that all written agreements and MOUs between FDA and others shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    , the agency is publishing notice of the MOU.                

Dated: September 30, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

      ( print page 60161)          ( print page 60162)          ( print page 60163)          ( print page 60164)          ( print page 60165)    

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S

[FR Doc. 04-22577 Filed 10-6-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-C
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4921 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the private business 

use requirements for bonds issued for lead service line replacement projects. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 

Mr. BENNET (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BROWN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the private business use requirements for bonds issued 

for lead service line replacement projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financing Lead Out 

5 of Water Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4921 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PRIVATE BUSINESS USE RE2 QUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN BONDS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 141(b)(6) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following new subparagraph: 

6 ‘‘(D) CLARIFICATION RELATING TO QUALI7 FIED LEAD SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT

8 USE.— 

9 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of 

10 this subsection, qualified lead service line 

11 replacement use shall not constitute pri12 vate business use. 

13 ‘‘(ii) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of 

14 this subparagraph— 

15 ‘‘(I) QUALIFIED LEAD SERVICE

16 LINE REPLACEMENT USE.—The term 

17 ‘qualified lead service line replacement 

18 use’ means, with respect to any public 

19 water system, use of the proceeds of 

20 an issue to replace any privately21 owned portion of a lead service line 

22 connected to such system to facilitate, 

23 achieve or maintain compliance with a 

24 national primary drinking water regu25 lation for lead. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4921 IS

1 ‘‘(II) LEAD SERVICE LINE.—The 

2 term ‘lead service line’ has the mean3 ing given such term in section 

4 1459B(a)(4) of the Safe Drinking 

5 Water Act. 

6 ‘‘(III) NATIONAL PRIMARY

7 DRINKING WATER REGULATION FOR

8 LEAD.—The term ‘national primary 

9 drinking water regulation for lead’ 

10 means a national primary drinking 

11 water regulation for lead promulgated 

12 under section 1412 of such Act. 

13 ‘‘(IV) PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM.— 

14 The term ‘public water system’ has 

15 the meaning given such term in sec16 tion 1401(4) of such Act.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to obligations issued after Decem19 ber 31, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
INTERNET COMMERCE CORPORATION


                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Commerce Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, G. Michael Cassidy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




/s/ G. Michael Cassidy
---------------------
G. Michael Cassidy
Chief Executive Officer
March 16, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Michael Frank Connor, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

          4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.



     Date: March 30, 2004                   /s/ Michael Frank Connor
                                            ------------------------
                                            Michael Frank Connor
                                            President
ïn'q/eTelfa7emsv,loorfndeuystice

U nited States D istrict C o urt

for the S outhern D istrict of Florida

No e <

UNITED STATES O F AMERICA Inm ate Nam e:Charles Edward Clayton 11

V. ln rnate #: 13 2 0 0 08 73 -

Charl es E dwa rd C1 ayt on I I /

W RIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM

ANY UNITED STATES MARSHAL, and

WARDEN, of the BSO Main Jail

lt appearing from the petition of the United States of America that the defendant in the above case,

United States VS . Charles Edward Clayton 11 j fjned in the PSO Main J S COn ail

at

555 SE 1st Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 d thatthis case is Setfor an initial appea an rance

aS to thO de enf dant at 299 E Broward Blvd, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

, and that it is necessary for the defendant to be before this Coud for this proceeding;

NOW , THEREFORE, this is to command you, any United States Marshal, that you have the body of

Charles Edward Clayton I I , Inmate #13200 08 73 j tod as aforesaid Under Safe and Secur l1OW 11 CUS 9 , e conduct before this ,

Court at 299 E Broward Blvd, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

bY Or boforo, 11 : 00 A u wednesday, July 22 , 2O2 0 initial appe ., 00 fOr 3r1 Ol1 arance the criminal Charges

pending against the defendant in this case, and upon completion of aII proceedings that you return the defendant with a1I

convenient speed, under safe and secure conduct to the custody of the W arden of the aforesaid penal institution.

Bso Main Jail 

t

And this is to command you, the W arden of a

sss sE 1st Ave , Fort Lauderdale , FL 33301 d jjver into the C to e ustody Of any United States

Marshal, upon production

district for this purpose. 

F & oa hx -zskz slt ylorida, this tN- day of 

ooxE and oRoERso at MQ * Z 'V 6 . 

,

PATRICK HUNT

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CC' U s Attorney (AUSA AJAY ALEXANDER . . )

U.S. Marshal (3 cedified copies)

Chief Probation Officer

to you of a certified copy of this writ, the body of the defendant for safe and secure conduct to this

Case 0:20-mj-06245-JMS Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2020 Page 1 of 1
#### James Walker, Respondent, v. Harold R. Hill, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order directs an examination of defendant before trial as to certain matters and denies an examination as to other matters.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
### [§§575, 576. Renumbered §§568, 569]
### [§6162. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(a)(12), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1825]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 763, provided for an extension of time for payment of tax on gain attributable to liquidation of personal holding companies.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on first day of month which begins more than 90 days after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1906(d)(1) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as an Effective Date of 1976 Amendment note under section 6013 of this title.
Legal Department 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3rd Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125 

Telephone 901.434.8600 

-PPARTMENT OF 

• \hiBFORW!ON 

: KEt OFER/Vi!ONS 

;sO -C' 18 P t- 3b 

Express 

VIA FACSIMILE 202-366-7536 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge < ^ ^j ''0! 

Office of Hearings, M-20 ' t ^U 

US Department of Transportation fK ' [^l-'f 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE . ^ ., K. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-3 20 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: FAADocketNo. CPlOSWOOOTt f ^ ^0 ' ^^^ 3 

Dear Judge Goodwin: 

Please allow this letter to serve as notice that the parties have reached an agreeable settlement of 

this matter. The final documents are forthcoming. We respectfully request that our Answer and 

request for a hearing be withdravm, and that this matter be removed from your trial docket. 

Should you have any questions or require additional action on our part, please do not hesitate to 

contact me. 

Sincerely, 

FEDERAL E2CPRESS CORPORATION 

Cynthia Chandler-Snell 

Sr. Attorney 

Regulatory Affairs 

(901)434-8361 Office 

(901) 434-8283 Fax 

cynthia.chandler-snell@fedex.com 

CC: James Archier, Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 MeachamBlvd. 

Suite 6E, Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

CAC/cac/841539
Exhibit 18.3











March 13, 2013








Board of Directors of


Paperweight Development Corp. and Subsidiaries


825 East Wisconsin Avenue


Appleton, Wisconsin 54912





Dear Directors:





We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.





We have audited the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012 and issued our report thereon dated March 13, 2013.  Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements describes changes in accounting principles for pension and other post-retirement benefit plans and inventory costing.  It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for pension and other post-retirement benefit plans and inventory costing has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management’s determination that these changes in accounting principles are preferable.  Based on our reading of management’s stated reasons and justification for these changes in accounting principles in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to these changes, we concur with management that such changes represent, in the Company’s circumstances, the adoption of preferable accounting principles in conformity with Accounting Standards Codification 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.





Very truly yours,





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
§ 4160.4 Appeals. ( a ) Any person whose interest is adversely affected who wishes to appeal or seek a stay of a final BLM grazing decision must follow the requirements set forth in § 4.472 of this title. The appeal and any petition for stay must be filed with the BLM office that issued the decision within 30 days after its receipt or within 30 days after the proposed decision becomes final as provided in § 4160.3(a).
( b ) When OHA stays all or a portion of a BLM grazing decision that affects a grazing permit or lease, BLM will authorize grazing use as follows: ( 1 ) When OHA stays implementation of all or part of a grazing decision that cancels or suspends a permit or lease, changes any term or condition of a permit or lease during its current term, or renews a permit or lease, BLM will continue to authorize grazing under the permit or lease, or the relevant term or condition thereof, that was in effect immediately before the decision was issued, subject to any relevant provisions of the stay order. This continued authorization will expire upon the resolution of the administrative appeal. Such continued authorization is not subject to protest or appeal.
( 2 ) When OHA stays implementation of a grazing decision that issues or denies issuance of a permit or lease to a preference transferee, BLM will issue the preference applicant a permit or lease with terms and conditions that are the same as the terms and conditions of the most recent permit or lease applicable to the allotment or portion of the allotment in question, subject to any relevant provisions of the stay order. This temporary permit will expire upon the resolution of the administrative appeal. Issuance of the temporary permit is not a decision subject to protest or appeal.
( 3 ) When OHA stays implementation of a grazing decision that issues a permit or lease to a preference transferee with terms and conditions different from terms and conditions of the most recent permit or lease applicable to the allotment or portion of the allotment in question, BLM will issue the preference applicant a permit or lease that, with respect to any stayed term or condition, is the same as the terms and conditions of the most recent permit or lease applicable to the allotment or portion of the allotment in question, subject to any relevant provisions of the stay order. This temporary permit will expire upon the resolution of the administrative appeal. Issuance of the temporary permit is not a decision subject to protest or appeal.
[71 FR 39508, July 12, 2006]
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN



### oplnloa Ror047el R*I ~~thhority

0r thr Tsnr 

### ?ribaa Boardto pornit



### mIlllet l&or 

### ta k uhedl

in 

### hanehtlng erope for prltstr

inflir1eu6lrr x0 an in roorlpt of pour letter of Jul9 17, 1w!:, srkl~ tllo

follow* ro~uart of tldr bapartcont: ViUl 9011



### ploarr adrlrrme what&w or 

### not 

### t he T s a r r tia o a b a r d h ot he l utharlty 

### t o pernit prlroa lrbor 

### ta br umd in 

### hanehtlnn, oropr tar lndlrl6ualh =Thlr nq\uo* 18 firwpt4db9 00&Q of lrttrr hornto rtkrhed. '

# F’ 529

,
### §6902. Provisions of special application to transferees

#### (a) Burden of proof

In proceedings before the Tax Court the burden of proof shall be upon the Secretary to show that a petitioner is liable as a transferee of property of a taxpayer, but not to show that the taxpayer was liable for the tax.

#### (b) Evidence

Upon application to the Tax Court, a transferee of property of a taxpayer shall be entitled, under rules prescribed by the Tax Court, to a preliminary examination of books, papers, documents, correspondence, and other evidence of the taxpayer or a preceding transferee of the taxpayer's property, if the transferee making the application is a petitioner before the Tax Court for the redetermination of his liability in respect of the tax (including interest, additional amounts, and additions to the tax provided by law) imposed upon the taxpayer. Upon such application, the Tax Court may require by subpoena, ordered by the Tax Court or any division thereof and signed by a judge, the production of all such books, papers, documents, correspondence, and other evidence within the United States the production of which, in the opinion of the Tax Court or division thereof, is necessary to enable the transferee to ascertain the liability of the taxpayer or preceding transferee and will not result in undue hardship to the taxpayer or preceding transferee. Such examination shall be had at such time and place as may be designated in the subpoena.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 843; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
Manufacturing Flow Sheet ( CBI )

PMN P.9 PMN P.9a

SectionA-2 SectionA-3

Exposure Release &

Disposal

CBI
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
<CURRENCY>  U.S.  DOLLARS


                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                         JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                                1
<CASH>                                                                 2,802,389
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          3,237,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                              343,785
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       6,859,511
<PP&E>                                                                 6,441,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         4,888,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         8,786,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                6,402,750
<BONDS>                                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                  90,064
<OTHER-SE>                                                             2,078,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  8,786,443
<SALES>                                                                6,913,511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       8,199,534
<CGS>                                                                  1,545,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          1,963,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       9,499,887
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        12,484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (3,204,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              28,870
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                (3,233,398)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (3,233,398)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              (.36)






<PAGE>




</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Samuel Moses Williams, Appellant

No. 06-15-00089-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

1424395). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Samuel Moses Williams, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 19, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Isidor Neuwirth, Respondent, v. Philip Melvin, Appellant.

Action to recover value of legal services rendered by plaintiff to defendant’s wife in connection with a suit for separation. Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from order dismissed, without costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *post,*p. 900.]