alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1358. Allocation of credits, income, and deductions

#### (a) Qualifying shipping activities

For purposes of this chapter, the qualifying shipping activities of an electing corporation shall be treated as a separate trade or business activity distinct from all other activities conducted by such corporation.

#### (b) Exclusion of credits or deductions

(1) No deduction shall be allowed against the notional shipping income of an electing corporation, and no credit shall be allowed against the tax imposed by section 1352(2).

(2) No deduction shall be allowed for any net operating loss attributable to the qualifying shipping activities of any person to the extent that such loss is carried forward by such person from a taxable year preceding the first taxable year for which such person was an electing corporation.

#### (c) Transactions not at arm's length

Section 482 applies in accordance with this subsection to a transaction or series of transactions—

(1) as between an electing corporation and another person, or

(2) as between a person's qualifying shipping activities and other activities carried on by it.

(Added Pub. L. 108–357, title II, §248(a), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1456; amended Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title IV, §401(a)(188), (189), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1193.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 115–141, §401(a)(188), substituted "section 1352(2)" for "section 1352(a)(2)".

Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 115–141, §401(a)(189), substituted "a person's" for "an person's".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to taxable years beginning after Oct. 22, 2004, see section 248(c) of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as an Effective Date of 2004 Amendments note under section 56 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 127—EXECUTIONS AND JUDICIAL SALES**

Sec.
2001.
Sale of realty generally.
2002.
Notice of sale of realty.
2003.
Marshal's incapacity after levy on or sale of realty.
2004.
Sale of personalty generally.
2005.
Appraisal of goods taken on execution.
2006.
Execution against revenue officer.
2007.
Imprisonment for debt.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of InstaCare Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith Berman, Principal Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Keith Berman Keith Berman Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer April 15, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1552-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-1552-DR), dated September 17, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 19, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective September 19, 2004. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-22065 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
### §546. Income not placed on annual basis

Section 443(b) (relating to computation of tax on change of annual accounting period) shall not apply in the computation of the personal holding company tax imposed by section 541.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 191.)
Exhibit 99.5



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of WTA Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:



| | (1) |  | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  | WTA INC.
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------
|                     
|Dated: March 18, 2003 |  |  |  |         
|                     
|                      |  |  |  |         
|                      |  |  |  |         
|                      |  |  |  |
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20179 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES ONYEJEKWE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-93-307-1
- - - - - - - - - - December 20, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Charles Onyejekwe appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court erred in finding that two prior state-court convictions were "unrelated cases" under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2). We have conducted a de novo review of this issue and conclude that the district court did not commit reversible error by treating each prior conviction as a separate case under the Guidelines. AFFIRMED.
HomeAbout NRCCareer OpportunitiesWorking at NRCNRC Ethics

# Laws, Regulations and Policies

Information relating to the regulation of ethical behavior for NRC employees.
        - Statutes            - Ethics Laws
          - Political Activities (Hatch Act) 
        - Ethics Regulations            - Government-wide Ethics Regulations 
          - NRC Supplemental Conduct Regulations 
        - Executive Order            - 12731 Principles of Ethical Conduct for Government Officers and Employees ( PDF Version ) 
        - Management Directives            - Legal and Ethical Guidelines (Volume 7 )
          - Personal Use of Information Technology (MD 2.7) 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 4, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Summaries of Major Ethics Rules
          - Laws, Regulations and Policies
          - Ethics Forms
          - Ethics Program Reviews
          - List of Prohibited Securities
          - Other Ethics Sites

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 4, 2021
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Discover the murals

Since 2015, Detroit’s annual public arts festival (known as Murals in the Market) has produced over new 30 murals each year. From colorful, abstract creations to political pieces, visitors can find a mural or two on almost every block. Mural subjects vary from celebrations of Detroit’s history and culture to commentary on current events. To see the hundreds of public art pieces scattered throughout 43-acre area, visit the Eastern Market Historic District. Guided tours and bike rentals are available. Consult the project’s website for more details. 

Activity FeeNo

## ** Tags

            -  art 
            -  murals 
            -  art exhibit 
            -  outdoor activities 
            -  detroit 
            -  michigan 
            -  michigan history 
            -  discover our shared heritage travel itineraries 

## ** Tags

        -  art 
        -  murals 
        -  art exhibit 
        -  outdoor activities 
        -  detroit 
        -  michigan 
        -  michigan history 
        -  discover our shared heritage travel itineraries 

Last updated: August 23, 2020

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         586,933
<SECURITIES>                                20,072,965
<RECEIVABLES>                                  264,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,400
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,950,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          261,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,688,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,950,740
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               470,641
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                401,576
<INCOME-TAX>                                   401,576
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            401,576
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   401,576
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
----

OPINION No 9/2005

concerning a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions (COM(2005) 130 Final)

(2005/C 000/02)

THE COURT OF AUDITORS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 248 and 279 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal for a Council Regulation (COM(2005) 130 final) amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions, amended by the Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1149/1999 and by the Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2273/2004,

Having regard to the Council decision of 2 June 2005 to consult the European Court of Auditors about the proposal,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING OPINION:

This opinion was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 10 November 2005.

For the Court of Auditors

Hubert WEBER

The President

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from UniDyn, Corp. and Subsidiary September 30, 1998 financial
                  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
                  such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                     0000894542
<NAME>                                    UniDyn, Corp.

       

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998

<CASH>                                                     82,426
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              81,725
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                49,856
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           232,372
<PP&E>                                                     63,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                             (230)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             4,561,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      101,461
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   32,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                 4,428,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               4,561,933
<SALES>                                                    1,418,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           1,418,998
<CGS>                                                      467,975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              467,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           1,064,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         2,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            99,650
<INCOME-TAX>                                               7,050
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        92,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                               92,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .00
        


</TABLE>
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Jose F. Noesi, Petitioner,

v.

United States of America, 

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-21256-Civ-Scola

Order Denying Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis

The Petitioner Jose F. Noesi has moved for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis on appeal. The Court denies his motion because his appeal is not taken 

in good faith.

“An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in 

writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). “A party 

demonstrates good faith by seeking appellate review of any issue that is not 

frivolous when examined under an objective standard.” Ghee v. Retailers National 

Bank, 271 F. App’x 858, 859 (11th Cir. 2008). An appeal filed in forma pauperis 

is frivolous “when it appears the plaintiff has little or no chance of success,” 

meaning that the “factual allegations are clearly baseless or that the legal 

theories are indisputably meritless.” Carroll v. Gross, 984 F.2d 392, 393 (11th 

Cir. 1993) (internal quotation marks omitted). Noesi’s appeal has little to no 

chance of success: he has not obtained an order from the appropriate court of 

appeals authorizing the district court to consider his successive § 2255 petition. 

See Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, Rule 9; Gonzalez v. Secretary for Dep’t 

of Corr., 366 F.3d 1253, 1297-98 (11th Cir. 2004). The allegations he presents 

in his notice of appeal fail to address these shortcomings, and he does not set 

forth any legal theory that has any merit.

For the reasons set forth above, the Court denies Noesi’s motion for leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 12) and certifies that his appeal 

is not taken in good faith.

Done and ordered, at Miami, Florida, on July 28, 2020.

______________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-21256-RNS Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2020 Page 1 of 1
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-____.] 

 

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HALE. 

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5079.] 

(No. 2013-1622—Submitted July 21, 2016—Decided July 25, 2016.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Harland Hanna Hale, Attorney 

Registration No. 0023464, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 18, 2014, 

wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended 

respondent from the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that 

respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of 

Gov.Bar R. V(24). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). 

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale, 141 Ohio St.3d 

518, 2014-Ohio-5053, 26 N.E.3d 785. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,

FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 

________________________
THE MEYERSON LAW FIRM, P.C. 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

2224 Walsh Tarlton Ln., Suite 120 

Austin, Texas 78746

Phone: (512) 330-9001 │ Fax: (512) 330-9005 

www.meyersonfirm.com 

________________________________________________________________ 

August 17, 2015 

Via E-filing

Honorable Justice David Puryear 

Honorable Justice Bob Pemberton 

Honorable Justice Scott Field 

3

rd Court of Appeals 

209 West 14th St., Room 101 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Re: Verticor, Ltd. v. Michael Wood, Appellate Cause No. 03-14-00277-CV, In the Court of 

Appeals for the Third District of Texas (at Austin) 

To the Honorable Justices: 

 

This letter is written to respectfully request the 3rd Court of Appeals rule on the pending 

interlocutory appeal in Cause No. 03-14-00277-CV. As the Court is aware, Appellant Verticor, 

Ltd. filed its Notice of Appeal on May 2, 2014. This is an accelerated appeal pursuant to Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 28.1(a) and § 51.014(a)(9) of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies 

Code. Briefs were filed by both parties and oral argument was heard on October 8, 2014. Since 

that date, no ruling has been issued by the Court. In an effort to allow this case to move forward 

in the trial court, Appellee Michael Wood is formally requesting the Court rule on the pending 

appeal. Should the Court have any questions, please contact our office. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Jeff. M. Meyerson 

cc: Mr. David E. Chamberlain 

Ms. Catherine L. Kyle 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00277-CV

6524656

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

8/17/2015 2:05:17 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/17/2015 2:05:17 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk