alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCEmergency Preparedness & ResponseAbout NRC Emergency Response

# Nuclear Facility Response

Once an incident has occurred that could release enough radioactive material to exceed Federal government protective action guides, the responsible plant personnel evaluate conditions and recommend public protective actions (e.g. sheltering or evacuation) to the State and local government agencies. Nuclear power plants must give these recommendations to the State or local government within 15 minutes of a General Emergency declaration (the highest level of emergency) and to the NRC Operations Center as soon as possible. All of this must occur within 1 hour of determining that an accident could affect the public.

All NRC licensed facilities' emergency plans must provide reasonable assurance that adequate measures can and will be taken in the event of an emergency. Nuclear power plants must have an onsite emergency response plans, and if required, State and local agencies must have an offsite plan to account for potential impact to people located some distance away from the plant.

Large fuel cycle and materials facilities must have only an onsite radiological emergency response plan. No formal offsite response plan is required, since accidents at these facilities are not expected to affect anyone much beyond the site boundary. (This is the same sort of arrangement for industrial facilities where accidents are dealt with by offsite firefighters and police routinely with an all-hazards response plan.)

For smaller licensees, no formal response plans are required since accidents would have no significant impact outside the facility. These licensees are required to have appropriate internal procedures in place to protect workers and control radioactive materials.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 13, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Response Modes
          - Response to Hurricanes
          - State and Local Response Actions
          - Nuclear Facility Response
          - Emergency Preparedness in Response to Terrorism

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 13, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-60614-RAR

RICHARD MOYER,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASCH RAINES, LLP, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon sua sponte review of the docket. On May 11, 

2020, the Court entered an Order Administratively Closing Case [ECF No. 12] (“Order”) requiring 

the parties to file a joint stipulation of dismissal on or before June 10, 2020. To date, there is no 

indication that the parties have filed the required stipulation of dismissal nor have they requested 

an extension of time to do so. Therefore, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before July 15, 2020, the parties shall file a 

joint stipulation of dismissal or show good cause as to why this Court should not impose sanctions.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 16th day of June, 2020.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 0:20-cv-60614-RAR Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2020 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2





I, Jaren Chan Eng Ann, CEO, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K-SB of Myoffiz, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.













|September 22, 2004 | /s/    Jaren Chan Eng Ann
|------------------ | -------------------------
|                   | Jaren Chan Eng Ann       
|                   | Chief Executive Officer
#### § 4300.24 Does my filed application mean that no one else can file an application?

No. The filing of your application will not segregate the land. Anyone else may file an application and BLM may dispose of the lands under the public land laws.
### [§1051. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §221(a)(78), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4049]

Section, Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 310; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1901(a)(131), 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1786, 1834, related to property acquired by a corporation during affiliation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 19, 2014, subject to a savings provision, see section 221(b) of Pub. L. 113–295, set out as an Effective Date of 2014 Amendment note under section 1 of this title.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of **CHINA DIGITAL COMMUNICATION GROUP** (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Yi Bo
Sun, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
 
 Dated
this 29 th day of
March, 2005.
 /s/
      Yi Bo SunYi
      Bo SunChief
      Executive Officer
  32
### §125. Utah

Utah constitutes one judicial district comprising two divisions.

(1) The Northern Division comprises the counties of Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Morgan, Rich, and Weber.

Court for the Northern Division shall be held at Salt Lake City and Ogden.

(2) The Central Division comprises the counties of Beaver, Carbon, Daggett, Duchesne, Emery, Garfield, Grand, Iron, Juab, Kane, Millard, Piute, Salt Lake, San Juan, Sanpete, Sevier, Summit, Tooele, Uintah, Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and Wayne.

Court for the Central Division shall be held at Salt Lake City, Provo, and St. George.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 893; Pub. L. 104–317, title VI, §606, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3859.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §190 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §109, 36 Stat. 1127).

A provision relating to the maintenance of offices by the clerk was omitted as covered by section 751 of this title.

Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Par. (1). Pub. L. 104–317, §606(a), inserted "Salt Lake City and" before "Ogden".

Par. (2). Pub. L. 104–317, §606(b), inserted ", Provo, and St. George" after "Salt Lake City".
### §§202a, 202b. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 649

Section 202a, act June 26, 1936, ch. 830, title V, §501, 49 Stat. 1964, established the Federal Alcohol Administration, and provided for appointment, duties, and pay of its employees.

Section 202b, act June 26, 1936, ch. 830, title V, §502, 49 Stat. 1964, provided for appointment, pay, tenure, and powers of members of the Federal Alcohol Administration.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5002 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5002

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To allow for alternatives to animal testing for purposes of drug and 
                    biological product applications.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FDA Modernization Act 2.0''.

SEC. 2. ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING.

    (a) In General.--Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (i)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``preclinical 
                tests (including tests on animals)'' and inserting 
                ``nonclinical tests''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ``animal'' and 
                inserting ``nonclinical tests''; and
            (2) after subsection (y), by inserting the following:
    ``(z) Nonclinical Test Defined.--For purposes of this section, the 
term `nonclinical test' means a test conducted in vitro, in silico, or 
in chemico, or a non-human in vivo test that occurs before or during 
the clinical trial phase of the investigation of the safety and 
effectiveness of a drug, and may include animal tests, or non-animal or 
human biology-based test methods, such as cell-based assays, 
microphysiological systems, or bioprinted or computer models.''.
    (b) Biosimilar Biological Product Applications.--Item (bb) of 
section 351(k)(2)(A)(i)(I) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
262(k)(2)(A)(i)(I)) is amended to read as follows:
                                            ``(bb) an assessment of 
                                        toxicity (which may rely on, or 
                                        consist of, a study or studies 
                                        described in item (aa) or 
                                        (cc)); and''.

            Passed the Senate September 29, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 5002

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To allow for alternatives to animal testing for purposes of drug and 
                    biological product applications.
```
**EXHIBIT 4.3**
**SUMMARY OF EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS**
**BETWEEN BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT**
**AND KLAUS KUEHN**
    Term: K. Kuehn was appointed member of the Board of Management of the Companyby the Supervisory Board effective May 1, 2002. The term will expire onApril 30, 2007.
Compensation: The aggregate remuneration of K. Kuehn for 2003 is comprised ofthe following elements:
Base salary: EUR 409,144. K. Kuehn also received remuneration in kind totalingEUR 25,287 and consisting mainly of amounts such as the value assigned to theuse of a company car for taxation purposes.
Fixed supplement: EUR 63,870
Variable bonus: EUR 436,590(determined by attainment of the group gross cash flowtarget)
Stock option rights: K. Kuehn received a total of 6,450 option rights on thebasis of his own investments. The options from this tranche had an intrinsicvalue of EUR 37,797 at the closing date (if they could have been exercised).
Retirement: The Company will pay K. Kuehn a monthly pension equal to 80 percentof the last monthly base salary and fixed supplement received while in service.These amounts are in addition to any amounts received as a result of hisparticipation in Bayer’s Employee Pension Plan (See Item 6). He will beentitled to receive the pension upon completion of 30 years of services withthe Bayer group or 8 years of membership in the Executive Board of the Company.
#### Emil K. Ellis, Respondent, v. Herbert Mitchell, Respondent; Robert I. Lennox, Appellant, and Charles Zarkin et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *post,*pp. 823, 923.]
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Contact Us
  Return to Previous Page
 Thing to Do
Hike Skull Rock
Joshua Tree National Park A hiker walking on a dirt trail with rocks in the backgroundThe Skull Rock Trail
NPS / Hannah Schwalbe Pets Allowed
No
 Activity Fee
No
 Location
Skull Rock Trailhead
 
 Season
Winter, Spring, Fall
 Joshua Tree National Park Tags joshua tree national park
joshua tree
geology
rocks
skull rock
trail
skull rock trail
 
 Tags joshua tree national park
joshua tree
geology
rocks
skull rock
trail
skull rock trail
 Last updated: June 30, 2021


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


World War I Memorial
District of Columbia


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Directions
 Parking Icon**Parking**
General visitor parking is available throughout the city. Bus parking is available primarily along Ohio Drive, SW near the Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson Memorials and along Ohio Drive, SW in East Potomac Park. See the Maps section for a detailed understanding of these areas.

Public Transit**Public Transportation**
Public transportation is the best option for reaching National Mall and Memorial Park sites easily and conveniently. The Washington, DC subway system, known as Metro, is conveniently located near the World War I Memorial. From the Blue/Orange/Silver lines, exit at the Federal Triangle station; from the Red line, use Metro Center.Capital Bikeshare is metro DC's bikeshare service, with 4,500 bikes and 500+ stations across the region, a number of which are located close to sites on the National Mall. There is Bikeshare station at 15th Street NW and Pennsylvania Avenue NW, directly across the street from the World War I Memorial.

Car Icon**Car**
Interstate 395 provides access to the Mall from the South. Interstate 495, New York Avenue, Rock Creek and Potomac Parkway, George Washington Memorial Parkway, and the Cabin John Parkway provide access from the North. Interstate 66, U.S. Routes 50 and 29 provide access from the West. U.S. Routes 50, 1, and 4 provide access from the East.
 Last updated: April 15, 2021
 Park footer Contact Info Phone: (202) 426-6841
Visitor Information Phone Number Contact Us
 Tools Site Index
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
4:

**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350**

In
connection with this quarterly report of Tayco Developments, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedNovember 30, 2002 to be filed with Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas P. Taylor,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

It is
not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

|Date: January 14, 2003 | By: | s/Douglas P. Taylor      
|---------------------- | --- | -------------------------
|                       |     | Douglas P. Taylor,       
|                       |     | Chief Executive
  Officer

**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**



In connection with this quarterly
report of Tayco Developments, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended November 30, 2002 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on
or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth G. Bernstein, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

|Date:
      January 14, 2003 | By: | s/Kenneth G. Bernstein 
|---------------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                             |     | Kenneth G. Bernstein,  
|                             |     | Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.311 Definitions. ( a ) *Organization for the disabled* means one which: ( 1 ) Is organized under federal or state law to operate in the interest of disabled individuals;
( 2 ) Is non-profit;
( 3 ) Employs disabled individuals for seventy-five percent of the time needed to produce commodities or services for sale; and
( 4 ) Complies with occupational and safety standards prescribed by the Department of Labor.
( b ) *Disabled individual* means a person who has a permanent physical, mental or emotional impairment, defect, ailment, disease or disability which limits the type of employment for which the person would otherwise be qualified.
### **Subchapter A—Tax on Employees**

Sec.
3101.
Rate of tax.
3102.
Deduction of tax from wages.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In re Bobby B. Dash, Relator

Appellate case numbers: 01-18-00653-CV & 01-18-00725-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-16096

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

The en banc Court voted to deny relator’s pro se motion for en banc reconsideration 

of this Court’s August 31, 2018 Memorandum Opinion.

Relator’s motion for en banc reconsideration is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __Justice Evelyn Keyes_____

x Acting for the Court

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley,

Bland, Massengale, Brown, and Caughey. Justice Lloyd not sitting.

Date: __November 29, 2018___