alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6045B. Returns relating to actions affecting basis of specified securities

#### (a) In general

According to the forms or regulations prescribed by the Secretary, any issuer of a specified security shall make a return setting forth—

(1) a description of any organizational action which affects the basis of such specified security of such issuer,

(2) the quantitative effect on the basis of such specified security resulting from such action, and

(3) such other information as the Secretary may prescribe.

#### (b) Time for filing return

Any return required by subsection (a) shall be filed not later than the earlier of—

(1) 45 days after the date of the action described in subsection (a), or

(2) January 15 of the year following the calendar year during which such action occurred.

#### (c) Statements to be furnished to holders of specified securities or their nominees

According to the forms or regulations prescribed by the Secretary, every person required to make a return under subsection (a) with respect to a specified security shall furnish to the nominee with respect to the specified security (or certificate holder if there is no nominee) a written statement showing—

(1) the name, address, and phone number of the information contact of the person required to make such return,

(2) the information required to be shown on such return with respect to such security, and

(3) such other information as the Secretary may prescribe.

The written statement required under the preceding sentence shall be furnished to the holder on or before January 15 of the year following the calendar year during which the action described in subsection (a) occurred.

#### (d) Specified security

For purposes of this section, the term "specified security" has the meaning given such term by section 6045(g)(3)(B). No return shall be required under this section with respect to actions described in subsection (a) with respect to a specified security which occur before the applicable date (as defined in section 6045(g)(3)(C)) with respect to such security.

#### (e) Public reporting in lieu of return

The Secretary may waive the requirements under subsections (a) and (c) with respect to a specified security, if the person required to make the return under subsection (a) makes publicly available, in such form and manner as the Secretary determines necessary to carry out the purposes of this section—

(1) the name, address, phone number, and email address of the information contact of such person, and

(2) the information described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 110–343, div. B, title IV, §403(d)(1), Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3859.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 2011, see section 403(e)(1) of Pub. L. 110–343, set out as an Effective Date of 2008 Amendment note under section 1012 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee will meet October 15, 2004, (RAC) in Willits, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Approval of minutes, (2) Public Comment, (3) Sub-committees, (4) Discussion/Approval of projects (Hammerhorn Lake area, Howard Lake area, Travelers Home and Hellhole trails), (5) Matters before the group-discussion/action, (6) Next agenda and meeting date.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on October 15, 2004, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, located at 400 E. Commercial St., Willits, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo Road, Covelo CA 95428. (707) 983-8503; e-mail                         *rhurt@fs.fed.us*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff by October 11, 2004. Public comment will have the opportunity to address the committee at the meeting.

Dated: September 27, 2004.

Blaine Baker,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 04-22449  Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### BATES, Respondent, v. THE AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY, Appellant.

(205 N. W. 671.)

(File No. 5502.

Opinion filed November 9, 1925.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Davison County; Hon. Frank B. Smiti-i, Judge.

*Bailey & Voorhees,*of Sioux Falls, and *T. J. Spangler,*of Mitchell, for Appellant.

*Roscoe Satterlee,*of Mitchell, for Respondent.

Appellant cited: Boyd v. Elec. Co., 68 Pac. 810; Chapman v. Elec. Co., 67 P'ac. 928; Speilman v. Ry. Co., 5,5 N. W. 270; Lauden v. Scott, 194 Pac. 488; Ry. Co. v. Adams, 105 S. E. 566; Gay v. Director General of Railroads, in Atl. 855; Peterson v. Ry. Co., 19 S. D'. 122.

Respondent cited: Boehl v. C. M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 46 N. W. 333; Sweney v. American Express Company, 144 la. 342, 115 N. W. 212.

DILLON, J.

This is an action to recover damages brought by plaintiff against defendant American Railway Express Company, for an injury to a hog received while en route from Alton; Iowa, -to Mitchell, this state. When the case came up for trial, the court directed a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appealed. In the 'opinion handed down at that time by this court, the order of the trial court was reversed and a new trial granted. Bates v. American Railway Express Company, 45 S. D. 373, 187 N. W. 634. In this opinion it was stated that “the burden of proof is on the defendant to show that the proper degree ‘of care was exercised.” 10 C. J. 379. The case came up for a second trial and after all the evidence was submitted the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff, allowing damages in the sum of $237.50.

The pivotal point in this appeal was the question of negli*9•gence, and we think sufficient evidence has not been submitted in the second trial to change the decision announced in this case on the former appeal.

We therefore hold that the decision in the former appeal is •controlling and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
### §7410. Cross references

**(1) For provisions for collecting taxes in general, see chapter 64.**

**(2) For venue in a civil action for the collection of any tax, see section 1396 of Title 28 of the United States Code.**

**(3) For venue of a proceeding for the recovery of any fine, penalty, or forfeiture, see section 1395 of Title 28 of the United States Code.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 875, §7407; renumbered §7408, Pub. L. 94–455, title XII, §1203(g), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1693; renumbered §7409, Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §321(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 612; renumbered §7410, Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10713(a)(1), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–468.)
§ 3835.14 How do I submit a small miner waiver request for newly-recorded mining claims? In order to obtain a small miner waiver for newly-recorded mining claims, you must— ( a ) ( 1 ) Submit the waiver request on or before September 1; or
( 2 ) If the mining claim or site was located before September 1 and recorded after September 1 in a timely manner, you must submit the waiver request at the time of recording the mining claim or site with BLM, and
( b ) File on or before the December 30 immediately following the September 1st for which you applied for a waiver a notice of intent to hold the mining claim or site. The Mining Law does not require you to perform assessment work in the assessment year in which you locate a mining claim. The notice of intent to hold must conform to §§ 3835.31 through 3835.33.
[68 FR 61064, Oct. 24, 2003; 68 FR 74197, Dec. 23, 2003]
0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

() 

0 

0 (I 0 (I 

ll 0 0 1) 0 

0 

. . -~ .. -□ ... ..._.1 ' • r.iou o 00 

□···" . R.~::.:~. ~ 

0 11····-· ., 

...... ,. 

5 ..... ... . 

Q 

- - ·· - ···----·--··-··- -···-··· -· - ~ 

Q 

le~nd 

~- roc.k border 

Q 

Q 

0 

" 

Q 0 Q 

0 

0 

'} 

0 

N 

j 

s 

CAMP TULE LAKE

I 

PLOT PLAN CAMP BS-41• 

___________________ _j ___ ,~~--_J
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MAX CAPITAL GROUP LTD.

This certification is
provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007 of Max Capital Group Ltd. (the
Issuer).

I, W. Marston Becker, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer certify that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: February 19, 2008



/s/ W. Marston BeckerName: W. Marston Becker
### [§6424. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–424, title V, §515(b)(5), Jan. 6, 1983, 96 Stat. 2181]

Section, added Pub. L. 89–44, title II, §202(b), June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 137; amended Pub. L. 91–258, title II, §207(b), May 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 248; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(a)(30), (b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1828, 1834; Pub. L. 95–618, title II, §§222(a)(3), 233(b)(1), (2)(A), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3187, 3191; Pub. L. 97–473, title II, §202(b)(13), Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2610, had provided for payments by the Secretary of an amount equal to 6 cents for each gallon of lubricating oil used in a qualified business use or in a qualified bus to certain ultimate purchasers of the lubricating oil.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to articles sold after Jan. 6, 1983, see section 515(c) of Pub. L. 97–424, set out as an Effective Date of 1983 Amendment note under section 34 of this title.
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Ratesetting
            - CVP Annual Ratebooks & Schedules
            - CVP Ratebooks - M&I, 2005 

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP)                  - About the CVP
                - Water Info Links
                - Ratesetting
                - Projects/Activities
                - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation                         of the CVP and SWP
                - Laws/Regs/Links
                - Financial Information 
                - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
              - Programs & Activities
              - Projects & Facilities
              - Doing Business with Reclamation
              - Public Affairs
              - Employment
              - Recreation
              - Site Index
              - Contact Us

## CVP Ratebooks - M&I, 2005

*Note:  Documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) require Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher to view, download Adobe Acrobat Reader*

*Last Updated: 7/15/20*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

          - Contact Us
          - Site Index
          - Accessibility
          - Disclaimer
          - DOI
          - FOIA
          - No Fear Act
          - Notices
          - Privacy Policy
          - Quality of Information
          - Recreation.gov
          - USA.gov
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Go to the Beach

Olympic National Park
**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission**

**Selection of FY 2021 Special Interest Function for Analysis**

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has selected Product Service Code (PSC) DA10 “IT and Telecom-Business Application/Application Development Software as a Service” during fiscal year (FY) 2021. NRC obligated $2,554,889.44 on contracts under this PSC during FY2021.  PSC DA10 has been selected for further analysis for the following reasons: 

· It has not appeared previously on NRC’s Top 10 PSC list; 

· The remaining Top 9 PSCs for FY21 are either being evaluated as part of NRC’s strategic acquisition process, and additional analysis in these areas would be duplicative, or further analysis would be unwarranted due to the nature of those services; and

· PSC DA10 was not the subject of a previous focused analysis.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6550

MANUEL PEREZ-COLON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, 

at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00066-GMG-MJA)

Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: August 15, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Manuel Perez-Colon, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Tison, 

Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Manuel Perez-Colon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on PerezColon’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perez-Colon v. O’Brien, No. 3:14-cv00066-GMG-MJA (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 12, 2017). We further deny Perez-Colon’s motion 

to consolidate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
### **CHAPTER 2—PROHIBITION OF INTOXICATING BEVERAGES**

This chapter, comprising sections 11 to 64, in large measure became inoperative by the adoption of the 21st Amendment to the Constitution. See note preceding sections 1 to 5 of this title.

Repeal of provisions of this title affecting District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Hawaii and Alaska, see note preceding sections 1 to 5 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22773]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 26, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Sue Costello, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Rogers Investments, LP, Russellville, Alabama, (Partnership), 
with Diane Rogers Barnes, Marietta, Georgia, and Robert Isaac Rogers, 
Jr., Russellville, Alabama, as general partners of Partnership, to 
acquire outstanding shares of Valley Bancshares, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Valley State Bank, both of 
Russellville, Alabama.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 5, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-22773 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

NGUYEN VU,

Petitioner

v.

JUDGE SANDY L.V. BYRD

, PRESIDENT

JUDGE SHEILA A. WOODS

- SKIPPER

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 106 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of November , 2018, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition and the Motion for

a Stay are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of the judges

from the caption.
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

July 12, 2024 SC-2024-0103 Ex parte Aleisha Danielle Parker PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Aleisha Danielle Parker v. State of Alabama) (Madison Circuit Court: CC-22-1572; Criminal Appeals: CR-2023-0381).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on July 12, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Bryan, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
### §479. Information on litigation management and cost and delay reduction

(a) Within four years after the date of the enactment of this chapter, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall prepare a comprehensive report on all plans received pursuant to section 472(d) of this title. The Director of the Federal Judicial Center and the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may make recommendations regarding such report to the Judicial Conference during the preparation of the report. The Judicial Conference shall transmit copies of the report to the United States district courts and to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

(b) The Judicial Conference of the United States shall, on a continuing basis—

(1) study ways to improve litigation management and dispute resolution services in the district courts; and

(2) make recommendations to the district courts on ways to improve such services.

(c)(1) The Judicial Conference of the United States shall prepare, periodically revise, and transmit to the United States district courts a Manual for Litigation Management and Cost and Delay Reduction. The Director of the Federal Judicial Center and the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may make recommendations regarding the preparation of and any subsequent revisions to the Manual.

(2) The Manual shall be developed after careful evaluation of the plans implemented under section 472 of this title, the demonstration program conducted under section 104 of the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990, and the pilot program conducted under section 105 of the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990.

(3) The Manual shall contain a description and analysis of the litigation management, cost and delay reduction principles and techniques, and alternative dispute resolution programs considered most effective by the Judicial Conference, the Director of the Federal Judicial Center, and the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.

(Added Pub. L. 101–650, title I, §103(a), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5095.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 101–650, which was approved Dec. 1, 1990.

Sections 104 and 105 of the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 [Pub. L. 101–650], referred to in subsec. (c)(2), are set out as notes under section 471 of this title.