alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### [§955. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §14212(a), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2217]

Section, added Pub. L. 94–12, title VI, §602(d)(3)(A), Mar. 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 62; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 99–514, title XII, §1221(c)(3)(B), (C), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2553; Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1012(i)(11), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3509, related to withdrawal of previously excluded subpart F income from qualified investment.

A prior section 955, added Pub. L. 87–834, §12(a), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 1013, related to investments in less developed countries and dealing with less developed country corporations, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–12, title VI, §602(c)(5), Mar. 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 59.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, and to taxable years of United States shareholders in which or with which such taxable years of foreign corporations end, see section 14212(c) of Pub. L. 115–97, set out as an Effective Date of 2017 Amendment note under section 851 of this title.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**948 CA 15-01525**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

KERRY A. DONOHUE, FORMERLY KNOWN AS KERRY A. IVES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
AMY BERNSTEIN, DEFENDANT, AND RICHARD BERNSTEIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

------------------------------------------- AMY BERNSTEIN, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,

V
MALACHI DONOHUE, DAVID J. BECKER, AND CHARLES BAKER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.

------------------------------------------- RICHARD BERNSTEIN, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,

V
MALACHI DONOHUE, DAVID J. BECKER AND CHARLES BAKER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF & CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (JOSHUA P. RUBIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (RICHARD P. WEISBECK, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Michael L. Nenno, A.J.), entered July 23, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon reargument, denied in part the motion of defendant Richard Bernstein seeking summary judgment. Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on August 26, 2016, and filed in the Cattaraugus County Clerk’s Office on September 29, 2016, It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### [§7264. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1904(b)(9)(C)(i), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1816]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 863, provided the penalty for offenses relating to renovated or adulterated butter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on first day of first month which begins more than 90 days after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1904(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as an Effective Date of 1976 Amendment note under section 4041 of this title.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

KAD/Research 06-74816

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SURINDER SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-74816

Agency No. A097-607-024

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Surinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of

FILED

NOV 30 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
KAD/Research 2 06-74816

removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

substantial evidence, Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 2008), and

we deny the petition. 

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination

because the significant contradiction within the letter of party membership

supports the IJ’s conclusion that several of Singh’s documents may have been

fraudulent, and the genuineness of these documents goes to the heart of Singh’s

claim. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741, 745 (9th Cir. 2004). Further, the IJ

reasonably rejected Singh’s explanations for material omissions in his asylum

application. See Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962-63 (9th Cir. 2004). In the

absence of credible testimony, Singh’s asylum and withholding of removal claims

fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Because Singh’s CAT claim is based on the testimony the IJ found not

credible, and Singh points to no other evidence to show it is more likely than not

he would be tortured if returned to India, his CAT claim fails. See id. at 1156-57. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 Date: August 8, 2008
    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR
WILLIAMS COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    /s/ RON E. HOOPERRon E. HooperSenior Vice President and Administrator

Bank of America, N.A.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 438

**Question 438:** In general, the nuclear power industry has concluded that workers are not likely to exceed 10% of the annual limit on intake, and therefore internal dose monitoring would not be required. However, some nuclear power plant licensees plan to continue internal dose monitoring and record and report monitoring results on a voluntary basis. 
> 
(a) If the results of both voluntary monitoring of the committed effective dose equivalent (CEDE) and required monitoring of the deep dose equivalent (DDE) are reported on an individual's NRC Form 5, with appropriate comments indicating that the CEDE monitoring results are not required (i.e., are voluntary), are the CEDE and the DDE required to be summed as the total effective dose equivalent on the NRC Form 5? 

(b) If so, is the remaining available TEDE for the current year in which the results were obtained determined as 5 rems minus the year-to-date DDE plus CEDE, or as 5 rems minus the year-to-date DDE only? (Note: the question assumes that the doses described are the only doses received by the individual in the current year.)

**Answer:**
> 
(a) No. If monitoring for DDE is required and monitoring for CEDE is not required, there is no requirement to sum the DDE and CEDE.

(b) No answer to this question is needed because the answer to (a) is "no". (Note: This question and answer apply to all licensees, not just nuclear power plants.)

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1202)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Insightful Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, the undersigned, Richard
Barber, Chief Financial Officer of Insightful Corporation, does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 3) | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Insightful Corporation.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 14, 2005

By:

/s/ Richard P. BarberRichard P. Barber Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4785 

AN ACT 

To extend by 19 days the authorization for the special 

assessment for the Domestic Trafficking Victims’ Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4785 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL 

2 ASSESSMENT FOR DOMESTIC TRAFFICKING 

3 VICTIMS’ FUND. 

4 Section 3014(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by strik6 ing ‘‘September 11’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30’’. 

Passed the Senate August 6, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4785 

AN ACT 

To extend by 19 days the authorization for the spetims’ Fund. cial assessment for the Domestic Trafficking Vic-
### §1735. Court record lost or destroyed where United States interested

(a) When the record of any case or matter in any court of the United States to which the United States is a party, is lost or destroyed, a certified copy of any official paper of a United States attorney, United States marshal or clerk or other certifying or recording officer of any such court, made pursuant to law, on file in any department or agency of the United States and relating to such case or matter, shall, on being filed in the court to which it relates, have the same effect as an original paper filed in such court. If the copy so filed discloses the date and amount of a judgment or decree and the names of the parties thereto, the court may enforce the judgment or decree as though the original record had not been lost or destroyed.

(b) Whenever the United States is interested in any lost or destroyed records or files of a court of the United States, the clerk of such court and the United States attorney for the district shall take the steps necessary to restore such records or files, under the direction of the judges of such court.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 946.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§685, 686 (R.S. §§903, 904; Jan. 31, 1879, ch. 39, §§2, 3, 20 Stat. 277).

A provision of section 686 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to allowances to clerks and United States attorneys for their services, and disbursements incidental to restoring lost records under such section was deleted as obsolete, in view of sections 508, 509, and 604 of this title, placing such officers on a salary basis and providing for their expenses.

Words "And in all cases where any of the files, papers, or records of any court of the United States have been or shall be lost or destroyed, the files, records and papers which, pursuant to law, may have been or may be restored or supplied in place of such records, files, and papers, shall have the same force and effect, to all intents and purposes, as the originals thereof would have been entitled to," at the end of section 685 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted as fully covered by the remainder of this section and by section 1734 of this title.

Words "or agency of the United States" were substituted for "of the Government" so as to eliminate any possible ambiguity as to the scope of this section. See definitive section 451 of this title.

The phrase "so far as the judges of such courts respectively shall deem it essential to the interests of the United States that such records and files be restored or supplied," was omitted as unnecessary.

Changes were made in phraseology.
§ 128.204 What size standards apply to VOSBs and SDVOSBs? ( a ) *Time of certification.* At the time of certification, a VOSB or SDVOSB must be a small business under the size standard corresponding to any NAICS code listed in its SAM profile. If SBA is unable to verify that an Applicant is small, SBA may deny the concern's application as a certified VOSB or SDVOSB, or SBA may request a formal size determination pursuant to part 121 of this chapter.
( b ) *Time of contract offer.* In connection with a VOSB or SDVOSB contract, a VOSB or SDVOSB must be small under the size standard corresponding to the NAICS code assigned to the contract at the time it submits its initial offer or response which includes price. To be eligible for a VOSB or SDVOSB multiple award contract, a VOSB or SDVOSB must be small pursuant to the requirements of § 121.404(a)(1) of this chapter. If the contracting officer is unable to verify that the VOSB or SDVOSB is small, the contracting officer should submit a size protest to SBA in accordance with part 121 of this chapter.
§ 4.613 When may I file an application for an award? ( a ) You may file an application whenever you have prevailed in the proceeding or in a significant and discrete substantive portion of the proceeding. You must file the application no later than 30 days after the final disposition of the proceeding.
( b ) Consideration of an application for an award must be stayed if: ( 1 ) Any party seeks review or reconsideration of a decision in a proceeding in which you believe you have prevailed; or
( 2 ) The Department or other agency (or the United States on its behalf) appeals an adversary adjudication to a court.
( c ) A stay under paragraph (b)(1) of this section will continue until there has been a final disposition of the review or reconsideration of the decision. A stay under paragraph (b)(2) of this section will continue until either: ( 1 ) A final and unreviewable decision is rendered by the court on the appeal; or
( 2 ) The underlying merits of the case have been finally determined.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Pearl Harbor
National Memorial
Hawai'i


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Weather
 Hawaii really has only two seasons – winter (ho'oilo in Hawaiian) and summer (kau wela in Hawaiian) – and temperatures don't change drastically the way they do in the mainland United States. During the daytime, you can expect temperatures from the mid-70s to the mid-80s all year around. The lowest it gets in the winter months (November to March) is about 60 degrees. The Hawaiian winter is also considered the rainy season, and flash floods are not uncommon. You can expect to see lots of rainbows as the rain clears! Trade winds are a big part of the climate in Oahu. Tradewinds occur about 90% of the time in the summer and 50% of the time in winter. They help moderate temperatures and reduce humidity.**Please be aware that boat rides out to the USS Arizona Memorial are sometimes suspended due to high winds.**This decision is made by the U.S. Navy, which operates the boats out to the Memorial. If tours are suspended, they will resume once the wind subsides. Please go to our facebook page for updated information on boat ride suspensions. Visitors should be prepared for plenty of sun and/or rain on any given day. Please be sure to use sunscreen, wear a hat, and bring plenty of water for your visit. You may want to keep an umbrella handy in case of rain. Layered clothing is recommended to ensure comfort in dealing with the variable weather.

Average temperatures and precipitation in Honolulu, HI (source: weather.com)Average temperatures and precipitation in Honolulu, HI (source: www.weather.com)
 Last updated: September 19, 2018
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: National Park Service
Pearl Harbor National Memorial
1 Arizona Memorial Place
Honolulu,
HI
96818
 Phone: 808 422-3399 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
### §2374. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, §7104(l), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3788

Section, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §620D, as added Pub. L. 96–53, title V, §505, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 378, related to prohibition on assistance to Afghanistan.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5272-5273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2296]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9105]
RIN 1545-BC17


Changes in Computing Depreciation; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final and temporary regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects final and temporary regulations (TD 
9105) that were published in the Federal Register on January 2, 2004 
(69 FR 5). The document contains regulations relating to a change in 
computing depreciation or amortization as well as a change from a 
nondepreciable or nonamortizable asset to a depreciable or amortizable 
asset (or vice versa).

DATES: This correction is effective January 2, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Logan, (202) 622-3110 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final and temporary regulations (TD 9105) that is the subject 
of this correction is under section 446(e) of the Internal Revenue 
Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final and temporary regulations (TD 9105) contain 
errors that may prove to be misleading and are in need of 
clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the final and temporary regulations 
(TD 9105) that was the subject of FR. Doc. 03-31820, are corrected as 
follows:
    1. On page 6, column 1, in the preamble, paragraph 3, line 3, the

[[Page 5273]]

language ``T.C.Memo. 2003-75, the Tax Court'' is corrected to read 
``T.C. Memo. 2003-75, the Tax Court''.


Sec. 1.167(e)-1T  [Corrected]

0
2. On page 8, column 1, Sec. 1.167(e)-1T, paragraph (e), last line in 
the paragraph, the language ``expires on or before January 2, 2007'' is 
corrected to read ``expires on or before December 29, 2006''.


Sec. 1.446-1T  [Corrected]

0
3. On page 12, column 2, Sec. 1.446-1T, paragraph (e)(4)(iii), line 3, 
the language ``January 2, 2007.'' is corrected to read ``December 29, 
2006.''.


Sec. 1.1016-3T  [Corrected]

0
4. On page 12, column 3, Sec. 1.1016-3T, paragraph (j)(3), line 2, the 
language ``expires on or before January 2, 2007.'' is corrected to read 
``expires on or before December 29, 2006.''.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedures and Administration).
[FR Doc. 04-2296 Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### In the Matter of the Application of Adolph Schaeffer, Appellant, for a Writ of Certiorari to Review the Determination of Patrick A. Murphy, as Deputy Excise Commissioner, and Another, Respondents.

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Staple-ton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
#### § 113.4 Assurances required.

An application for financial assistance shall, as a condition to its approval and the extension of such assistance, contain or be accompanied by an assurance that the recipient will comply with this part. Such an assurance shall contain provisions authorizing the acceleration of the maturity of the recipient's financial obligations to SBA in the event of a failure to comply, and provisions which give the United States a right to seek judicial enforcement of the terms of the assurance. SBA shall specify the form of the foregoing assurance for each program, and the extent to which like assurances will be required of contractors and subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants in the program.
§ 3207.15 How do I qualify for a production extension? ( a ) BLM will grant a production extension of up to 35 years, if you are producing or utilizing geothermal resources in commercial quantities.
( b ) Before granting a production extension, BLM must determine that you: ( 1 ) Have a well that is actually producing geothermal resources in commercial quantities; or
( 2 ) ( i ) Have completed a well that is capable of producing geothermal resources in commercial quantities; and
( ii ) Are making diligent efforts toward utilization of the resource.
( c ) To qualify for a production extension under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, unless BLM specifies otherwise you must demonstrate on an annual basis that you are making diligent efforts toward utilization of the resource.
( d ) BLM will make the determinations required under paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2)(i) of this section based on the information you provide under subparts 3264 and 3276 and any other information that BLM may require you to submit.
( e ) For BLM to make the determination required under paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, you must provide BLM with information, such as: ( 1 ) Actions you have taken to identify and define the geothermal resource on your lease;
( 2 ) Actions you have taken to negotiate marketing arrangements, sales contracts, drilling agreements, or financing for electrical generation and transmission projects;
( 3 ) Current economic factors and conditions that would affect the decision of a prudent operator to produce or utilize geothermal resources in commercial quantities on your lease; and
( 4 ) Other actions you have taken, such as obtaining permits, conducting environmental studies, and meeting permit requirements.
( f ) Your production extension will begin on the first day of the month following the end of the primary term (including the initial and additional extensions) or the drilling extension.
( g ) Your production extension will continue for up to 35 years as long as the geothermal resource is being produced or utilized in commercial quantities. If you fail to produce or utilize geothermal resources in commercial quantities, BLM will terminate your lease unless you meet the conditions set forth in § 3212.15 or § 3213.19.