alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0779. WILLIAM BERRY v. THE STATE.

In 2014, William Berry pled guilty to three counts of armed robbery, three

counts of aggravated assault, three counts of possession of a firearm during the

commission of a felony, and two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted

felon. For the purpose of sentencing, the trial court merged each aggravated assault

charge into its related armed robbery charge. In 2021, Berry filed a motion to correct

an illegal sentence, arguing that the trial court had improperly merged his armed

robbery and firearm possession charges. Related to this motion, Berry subsequently

filed motionsfor a calendar date, to “cease case transfer,” for “altered plea relief,” and

for resentencing. The trial court denied these motions, finding that Berry’s sentence

was not void. He appeals.

Under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may modify a sentence during the year

after its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal,

whichever is later. Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346, 347-348 (691 SE2d 247)

(2010); Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 118 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). Once this

statutory period expires, as it had here when Berry filed his motion, a trial court may

modify a sentence only if it is void. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483)

(2004). And a sentence is void only when the trial court imposes punishment that the

law does not allow, “most typically because it exceeds the most severe punishment

for which the applicable penal statute provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569,

572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). A direct appeal does not lie from the denial of a

motion to vacate a void sentence filed outside the statutory time period unless the

motion raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void. Frazier, 302 Ga.

February 10, 2022
App. at 348. 

Here, Berry has failed to raise a colorable claim that his sentence is void.

Although he asserts that the trial court improperly merged his armed robbery and

firearm possession charges, the sentence sheet shows that the court actually merged

his armed robbery and aggravated assault charges. Thus, Berry’s factual premise is

incorrect. Because he has not raised a colorable void sentence claim, this appeal is

hereby DISMISSED. See Frazier, 302 Ga. App. at 348-349.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/10/2022
----

Removal from the register of Case C-74/05 (1)

(2005/C 296/41)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 27 April 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-74/05 Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

----

(1)OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc. (“ATSC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing                           ( print page 60895)                        (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of involving the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actural damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business is: Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc., Washington, DC. The nature and scope of ATSC's standards development activities are: Coordinating television standards among different communications media, focusing on digital television, interactive systems and broadband multimedia communications; developing digital television implementation strategies; and presenting educational seminars on the ATSC standards.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-22889 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EXHIBIT A 

Case 1:20-cv-22202-KMM Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/27/2020 Page 1 of 3
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Watch the Sunrise from Derby Wharf

Salem Maritime National Historic Site
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 9/30/98
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000894972
<NAME> CHANCELLOR MEDIA CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  334,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,002
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               376,797
<PP&E>                                         367,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,677
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,025,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,472
<BONDS>                                      3,018,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    409,500
<COMMON>                                         1,424
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,025,095
<SALES>                                        899,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               899,096
<CGS>                                          116,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  892,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             135,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,199
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,507
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,909)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 47,089
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (88,250)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)
        

</TABLE>
# Registration Jacket 66222-87

Vol.2______________________________________________________________

Page is not included in this copy.

Pages 146 through 147 are not included in this copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of
information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

_____ FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3051315-MAR-201110:17 AM
T11N R2E T11N R3E

YYOOLL OO CC OO

SSUUTTTTEE RR CCOO

30.6 R

29.2 R

0

30

19

36

25

31

24

26

35

23

29

20

32

Contract No. 14-06-200-8322A-R-1

Exhibit B

Heidrick, Mildred

725-202-66

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 8, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\heidrick_mildred_8322\heidrick_mildred.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6080

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ABETUBOKUN A. ADESIOYE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:00-cr-00605-PJM-1; 8:22-cv-00204-PJM)

Submitted: August 22, 2024 Decided: August 26, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abetubokun A. Adesioye, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6080 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/26/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Abetubokun A. Adesioye seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Adesioye has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6080 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/26/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
#### § 107.502 Representations to the public.

You may not represent or imply to anyone that the SBA, the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or officers has approved any ownership interests you have issued or obligations you have incurred. Be certain to include a statement to this effect in any solicitation to investors. Example: You may not represent or imply that “SBA stands behind the Licensee” or that “Your capital is safe because SBA's experts review proposed investments to make sure they are safe for the Licensee.”
§ 9212.2 Fire prevention orders. ( a ) To prevent wildfire or facilitate its suppression, an authorized officer may issue fire prevention orders that close entry to, or restrict uses of, designated public lands.
( b ) Each fire prevention order shall: ( 1 ) Identify the public lands, roads, trails or waterways that are closed to entry or restricted as to use;
( 2 ) Specify the time during which the closure or restriction shall apply;
( 3 ) Identify those persons who, without a written permit, are exempt from the closure or restrictions;
( 4 ) Be posted in the local Bureau of Land Management office having jurisdiction over the lands to which the order applies; and
( 5 ) Be posted at places near the closed or restricted area where it can be readily seen.
Third Department,

September, 1943.

(September 15, 1943.)

#### In the Matter of the Claim of Bernard H. Witt, Respondent, against Charles Hoelzer & Sons et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
#### In the Matter of Bond and Mortgage Guarantee Company (Boardwalk, between West 11th St. and West 12th St., Coney Island, New York — Guarantee No. 171,050). John G. Ward et ah, as Executors and Trustees of William J. Ward, Deceased, Appellants; Lafayette National Bank of Brooklyn in New York, as Trustee for Certificate Holders, et al., Respondents.

Present—Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.; Hagarty, J., not voting.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Virgin Islands
National Park
Virgin Islands


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Frequently Asked Questions
 How Many Acres is the Park?
The park is comprised of 7,259 terrestrial acres and 5,650 submerged acres.
The park owns 122 acres or 90% of Hassel Island.

**What can I do in an hour?**Self-guided trails at Annaberg sugar mill and Cinnamon Bay sugar mill are one-half mile or less and can take an hour to explore.**What can I do in two - three hours?**One can hike the Lind Point trail from the Visitor Center to Salomon or Honeymoon beaches within 2 hours.Safari taxi drivers offer a two-hour island tour as well, stopping at scenic overlooks.Many of the ranger-led programs take less than two hours.  See the Weekly Programs brochure for more details.**What can I do in a day?**
The Reef Bay hike takes almost six hours, starting from the Visitor Center at 9:30 a.m. Mondays and Thursdays (schedule changes during the winter months).  Reservations are required and there is a transportation fee.  Hikers should bring adequate water, lunch and a swimsuit. See the Weekly Programs brochure for more details.

**Where is the best snorkeling?**
The calm warm waters around St. John provide great opportunities for snorkeling. Some of the best areas for snorkeling can be accessed from the shoreline. Stop by the VisitorCenter for a park brochure and snorkeling guide.
 Last updated: April 14, 2015
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 1300 Cruz Bay Creek
St. John,
VI
00830
 Phone: 340 776-6201
Headquarters/Visitor Center phone contact Information.  Visitor Center hours Monday-Friday 8:15 am to 1:30 pm. Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
EXHIBIT 4.9


 


AMENDMENT TO


BLACK RIDGE OIL & GAS, INC.


2020 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This document is the
Amendment to the Black Ridge Oil & Gas, Inc. 2020 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”).


 


W I T N E S S E T H


 


WHEREAS, Black
Ridge Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) has established the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, Section
10.10 of the Plan permits amendment of the Plan by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), conditioned
on additional approvals by the Company’s shareholders for certain amendments;


 


WHEREAS, the
Board has authorized the Company to close on that certain Asset Purchase Agreement (the “APA”) dated June 9,
2020 with Seller (as defined therein) pursuant to which the Company will purchase assets related to the freeze-dried fruits business
of Seller (the “Transaction”); and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to the APA and as a condition to closing the Transaction, the Board is required to have approved an amendment to the Plan (subject
to further approval by shareholders within one year of closing on the Transaction).


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the premises, the Plan is amended as follows:


 


Section 5.1 of the
Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“5.1Number of Shares.
Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 10.6, the number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued under the Plan shall
not exceed 514,150 shares of Common Stock. Shares of Common Stock that are issued under the Plan or are subject to outstanding
Incentives will be applied to reduce the maximum number of shares of Common Stock remaining available for issuance under the Plan.
Shares of Common Stock subject to a participant’s exercise of either an option or a SAR, but not both (a “tandem SAR”),
shall be counted only once.”


 


[Certification on following page.]


 


 






    	 	 	 



     


    




 


CERTIFICATION


 


The undersigned Chairman
of the Board of Black Ridge Oil & Gas, Inc., a Nevada corporation, does hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment to the
Black Ridge Oil & Gas, Inc. 2020 Stock Incentive Plan was adopted for the Company by its Board of Directors, subject to approval
by the stockholders, at a meeting of the Board of Directors held September 29, 2020.


 


 


 


___________________________________________




Bradley Berman, Chairman of the Board
EXHIBIT
      32(a)





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of China Digital Communication Group (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Zhongnan Xu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
      Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best
      of
      my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and


(2)
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





October
      9, 2007





/s/
                Zhongnan XuZhongnan
                XuChairman
                and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                Officer)
### §5381. Natural wine

Natural wine is the product of the juice or must of sound, ripe grapes or other sound, ripe fruit, made with such cellar treatment as may be authorized under section 5382 and containing not more than 21 percent by weight of total solids. Any wine conforming to such definition except for having become substandard by reason of its condition shall be deemed not to be natural wine, unless the condition is corrected.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1383; amended Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(a)(48), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 288.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5381, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 668, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1979—Pub. L. 96–39 struck out provisions authorizing removal for distillation of wine deemed not to be natural wine, destruction of such wine under government supervision, and transfer of such wine to premises in which other than natural wine may be stored or used.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 810 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1959, see section 210(a)(1) of Pub. L. 85–859, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
§ 107.620 Requirements to obtain information from Portfolio Concerns. All the information required by this section is subject to the requirements of § 107.600 and must be in English. ( a ) *Information for initial Financing decision.* Before extending any Financing, you must require the applicant to submit such financial statements, plans of operation (including intended use of financing proceeds), cash flow analyses and projections as are necessary to support your investment decision. The information submitted must be consistent with the size and type of the business and the amount of the proposed Financing.
( b ) *Updated financial information.* ( 1 ) The terms of each Financing must require the Portfolio Concern to provide, at least annually, sufficient financial information to enable you to perform the following required procedures: ( i ) Evaluate the financial condition of the Portfolio Concern for the purpose of valuing your investment;
( ii ) Determine the continued eligibility of the Portfolio Concern; and
( iii ) Verify the use of Financing proceeds.
( 2 ) Demographic information on the Portfolio Concern's ownership is requested for reporting purposes only and is on a voluntary basis.
( 3 ) The information submitted to you must be certified by the president, chief executive officer, treasurer, chief financial officer, general partner, or proprietor of the Portfolio Concern.
( 4 ) For financial and valuation purposes, you may accept a complete copy of the Federal income tax return filed by the Portfolio Concern (or its proprietor) in lieu of financial statements, but only if appropriate for the size and type of the business involved.
( 5 ) The requirements in this paragraph (b) do not apply when you acquire securities from an underwriter in a public offering (see § 107.825). In that case, you must keep copies of all reports furnished by the Portfolio Concern to the holders of its securities.
( c ) *Information required for examination purposes.* You must obtain any information requested by SBA's examiners for the purpose of verifying the certifications made by a Portfolio Concern under § 107.610. In this regard, your Financing documents must contain provisions requiring the Portfolio Concern to give you and/or SBA's examiners access to its books and records for such purpose.
[61 FR 3189, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 88 FR 46010, July 18, 2023]