Rick Tischaefer 

Biological Science Technician 

USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services 

Bismarck, North Dakota 

 

 

Human-Wildlife Conflicts

The coyote (Canis latrans; Figure 1) is a 

medium-sized member of the canid family. 

Once primarily found in western deserts 

and grasslands, coyotes have expanded 

their range across North America and into 

diverse habitats, including urban areas. 

This expansion occurred during a time of 

extensive habitat change and efforts by 

people to suppress coyote populations to 

prevent damage. 

Coyotes can cause a variety of conflicts 

related to agriculture, natural resources, 

property, and human health and safety. 

This document highlights a variety of 

methods for reducing those conflicts. 

Coyotes are a highly adaptable species 

and may become habituated to some 

management tools and techniques used to 

reduce or prevent damage. 

Wildlife Damage Management 

Technical Series

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service

Wildlife Services

November 2020 Coyotes

Figure 1. Coyote (Canis latrans).

Quick Links

Human-Wildlife Conflicts 1

Damage Identification 2

Management Methods 4

Economics 21

Species Overview 22

Legal Status 26

Glossary & Key Words 28

Resources 29

Appendices 32
Agriculture and Livestock

Coyotes are omnivores (i.e., eat plants and animals) and 

pose substantial threats to agricultural crops and 

livestock. They forage on agricultural crops, such as 

watermelons, sweet corn, and berries. Coyote 

depredation on poultry and livestock (e.g., sheep, 

cattle, goats), and non-traditional livestock and 

specialty breeds (e.g., miniature horses, donkeys, 

game birds, rabbits) is frequently a concern when 

both share the same environment. Furthermore, 

coyotes may spread the parasite Neospora caninum 

to livestock, causing abortion and neonatal mortality 

in cattle.

Human Health and Safety

Where coyotes occur near people, they sometimes 

become acclimated to human presence (Figure 2). 

Coyotes may attack and kill pets, other domestic 

animals, and sometimes threaten or attack people.

Additionally, coyotes pose aviation hazards when they 

occur on airports. In fact, coyotes are one of the 

terrestrial mammals most frequently struck by airplanes 

according to the Federal Aviation Administration’s 

National Wildlife Strike Database, 1990-2018.

Coyotes can carry transmissible diseases and parasites, such 

as rabies and Echinococcus granulosus tapeworms, which 

may threaten human health and safety.

Natural Resources

Coyote predation can impact the recovery of threatened 

and endangered species, such as black-footed ferrets 

(Mustela nigripes) and ground nesting birds (e.g., piping 

plovers (Charadrius melodus) and least terns (Sternula 

antillarum)).

Property and Nuisance Issues

Coyotes feed upon and scatter human garbage; eat 

unattended pet food or residual seed below feeders; and 

chew on rigging, straps or tie downs made of leather or 

treated with compounds containing sweet resin or sulphur. 

Damage Identification

Agriculture and Livestock

Many animals can cause damage to agricultural crops 

and livestock. Therefore, it is important to accurately 

identify the species responsible to select the most 

appropriate methods and techniques to include in an 

effective integrated damage management program. 

First, search for sign (e.g., tracks, scat, fur, carcass parts) 

by walking in ever expanding circles around the 

depredation site (it is also helpful to use a trained dog for 

this purpose). Check animal travel corridors for sign to aid 

in the investigation. Trail cameras may also be useful for 

monitoring a site. If ground conditions are suitable, rake a 

clear area in a suspected animal travel corridor and look 

for fresh tracks on future visits. In urban or suburban 

areas, scatter a thin layer of flour over dry hard surfaces 

(decks, sidewalks, driveways, or porches). Look for tracks 

in the following days to determine animal presence. Figure 2. Coyotes in cities and suburban areas often become less wary 

of people.

Page 2 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes
Next, examine the damaged resource. Coyotes eat smaller 

fruits and vegetables whole but can also cause extensive 

damage to larger fruits and plant parts. For example, 

coyotes will bite into and eat parts of watermelons. They 

will also knock down or rip out sweet corn plants by the 

roots and eat portions of a single ear before moving onto 

another plant. As generalist omnivores, coyotes may eat 

any type of food crop depending on local conditions and 

the availability of natural alternatives.

Regarding livestock depredation, examine the evidence to 

determine if the animal died of natural causes (and was 

later scavenged) or if it was killed by a predator. A timely 

evaluation of the depredation site is critical. Talk to the 

producer. If possible, ask them to cover the carcass to 

prevent scavengers from feeding and destroying evidence. 

Locate the attack, kill, and feeding sites and search for 

sign. Observe the remaining livestock in the vicinity to 

determine if additional stock are missing (e.g., an adult 

without young). 

Begin a field necropsy by noting the position of the 

carcass. Predated animals are rarely lying in a natural 

position. Examine the carcass for wounds, hemorrhaging, 

broken bones, and feeding to determine the cause of 

death. Hemorrhaging around any bite mark would indicate 

the prey was alive at the time of the bite. Do not confuse 

bruising (localized and dark in color) with conditions 

caused by decomposition (body fluids collect and cause 

discoloration). Blood from wounds of injured animals is 

thick and easily clots; differing from the thin reddish fluids 

resulting from decomposition. Note the number, size, 

depth, and location of tooth puncture marks. Size and 

spacing between canine teeth is characteristic for each 

predator species. Detailed notes and photographs will help 

document and assist in the investigation. 

Signs of coyote damage to livestock are diverse and may 

include the following:

• Eating the ears, noses, or tails of newborn calves;

• Killing of small ungulates like calves, lambs, and fawns 

which are easily overtaken by coyotes because of their 

size. For prey that is larger than a coyote, a rear leg 

may be damaged, or hamstring torn or rendered 

useless during an attack; 

• Biting the throat (behind jaw hinge and below ear). 

There may be multiple bites in a location due to a lack 

of penetration or loss of grip. Calves or larger livestock 

are often attacked at the flank or hindquarters. Small 

livestock may be killed by a single bite through the 

head;

• Distinctive puncture wounds. Location and spacing of 

puncture wounds will aid in determining the species. 

There will be slight measurement variations with age 

and between eastern and western coyotes. Generally, 

an upper jaw canine tooth is 1⁄4 inch (0.6 centimeters 

(cm)) in diameter and the puncture wound pattern of 

both upper canine teeth is 11⁄4 inches (3.1 cm) wide; 

and a lower jaw canine tooth is inch (0.4 cm) in 

diameter and the puncture wound pattern of both 

lower canine teeth is 11⁄8 inches (2.8 cm) wide; 

• Feeding on a carcass just behind the ribs. The heart, 

lungs, and liver or milk-filled stomach are often eaten 

first. In larger carcasses, feeding may begin on the 

hindquarters, near the anus or udder;

• Scattering remains (wool or hair, stomach contents, 

bones, etc.) or moving a carcass (small animals) or 

parts of a carcass to a safer or more protected area for 

feeding; 

• Presence of coyote sign near the location of the 

damage or attack, as well as the feeding site; and 

• Killing of multiple animals.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 3
Human Health and Safety

In cities and towns across the U.S., coyotes are thriving. 

This increased contact with people sometimes leads to 

bolder and more aggressive behaviors towards people and 

pets. Factors which may lead to or allow for the 

continuation of these aggressive behaviors include:

• Lack of fear by some coyotes likely due to changes in 

interactions between coyotes and people (e.g., people 

more likely to tolerate coyote presence, coyotes are 

rarely hunted or trapped in urban areas);

• Intentional feeding of coyotes by people; and

• Reduction in management and animal control 

programs that selectively remove problem coyotes. 

Many municipalities have developed urban coyote 

management plans that describe coyote actions and 

behaviors, and recommend management responses. A list 

of progressively bolder coyote behavior is described in 

Table 1. Many preventative actions (e.g., public education, 

stopping intentional and unintentional feeding, hazing) can 

be taken in the early stages to help curtail aggression. 

Coyotes can carry a variety of diseases and parasites 

which are easily transferrable to pets and people. Spread 

can occur through direct or indirect contact with bodily 

fluids and scat. In some cases, people may have no direct 

contact with coyotes, but may be at risk through a pet’s 

contact with coyotes or coyote scat. Pet vaccinations are 

an important tool for preventing the transfer of some 

diseases, such as rabies, canine distemper, and canine 

parvovirus.

Management Methods

Responsible and professional reduction or elimination of 

wildlife damage is the goal of wildlife damage management 

practitioners. This is best accomplished through an 

integrated approach. No single method is effective in every 

situation, and success is optimized when damage 

management is initiated early, consistently, and adaptively 

using a variety of methods. Because the legality of different 

methods vary by state, consult local laws and regulations prior 

to the implementation of any method.

For a summary table of coyote management methods, 

please see Appendix I. 

Animal Husbandry

Animal husbandry includes a variety of activities related to 

the care and attention given to livestock. Generally, when 

the frequency and intensity of livestock husbandry 

increases, so does the degree of protection from 

predators. 

Page 4 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

Stage Descriptive Behavior 

1 An increase in observing coyotes on streets or 

property at night

2 An increase in coyotes approaching people or 

taking pets at night

3 Early morning and late afternoon daylight 

sightings of coyotes

4 Daylight sightings of coyotes pursuing or taking pets

5 Coyotes attacking pets on a leash or in close 

proximity to their owners

6 Midday sightings in areas where children congregate

7 Midday aggression towards people

Table 1. Progression of coyote aggression compiled by Timm, Coolahan, Baker 

and Beckerman (2007). 
Altering animal husbandry to reduce wildlife damage can 

be effective but may have limitations. For example, 

confinement may not be possible when grazing conditions 

require livestock to scatter. Hiring extra people, building 

secure holding pens, and adjusting the timing of births is 

usually expensive. The expense associated with a change 

in husbandry practices may exceed the savings. 

Flock and Herd Health

Poultry and livestock breeds with stronger flocking and 

herding behaviors may be less vulnerable to coyote 

depredation. Coyotes often take advantage of prey with 

compromised health conditions. Proper feeding and care of 

livestock helps ensure stronger young that are less vulnerable 

to coyote depredation.

Record Keeping

Good record keeping and animal identification systems are 

invaluable in a livestock operation. Records help producers 

identify loss patterns or trends related to coyote depredation, 

as well as determine what type and amount of coyote 

damage management is feasible. Records also identify 

critical problem areas that may require attention. For 

example, records may show that losses to coyotes are high in 

a particular pasture in early summer, requiring proactive 

preventive management. Owners who do not regularly count 

their livestock may suffer fairly substantial losses before 

realizing a problem exists. Such delays make it difficult to 

accurately determine if losses are due to coyotes.

Birthing and Raising Young

Both the season and location of birthing and raising young

livestock can affect the severity of coyote depredation. 

Coyote related losses of young livestock are typically the 

highest from late spring through September when adult 

coyotes are feeding young. A fall birthing program is one 

option that avoids large numbers of young animals on the 

landscape during periods when coyote depredation is high.

Synchronized or group breeding helps shorten birthing 

periods and reduces exposure of small livestock to 

depredation. When birthing within a concentrated period, 

however, extra labor and facilities may be necessary. Some 

producers practice early weaning and do not allow young to 

go to large pastures, thus reducing coyote depredation. This 

also gives orphaned and weaker animals a greater chance of 

survival.

Where practical, sheds, pens, small pastures or paddocks for 

birthing or raising young livestock can increase survival. 

Increased human presence or activity around livestock also 

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 5

Figure 3. Good animal husbandry practices, such as penning sheep at night and properly burying or disposing of livestock carcasses (as shown),

can help prevent coyote depredation.
Page 6 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

helps to reduce coyote depredation. Confining livestock 

entirely to buildings nearly eliminates coyote depredation, 

though may be impractical in many situations.

Carcass Removal

The proper removal and disposal of dead livestock is

important since carcasses tend to attract coyotes and other 

predators, and may result in habituation to that food source 

(Figure 3). Coyotes are attracted to easily accessible carrion 

and, as a result, depredation losses to nearby livestock can 

be higher. 

Pasture Selection

Habitat features often change with seasonal crop growth. 

Harvested or cultivated fields are often void of coyotes during 

winter but provide cover for them during the spring through 

fall growing season. This may lead to a corresponding 

increase in depredation on nearby livestock. 

Livestock in remote or rugged pastures are usually more 

vulnerable to coyote depredation than those in closer, more 

open, and smaller pastures. A relatively small, open, tightlyfenced pasture that can be kept under close surveillance is 

generally a good choice for birthing livestock, if lambing sheds 

are unavailable. Also consider previous coyote presence in the 

area, as well as weather and disease issues.

At times, coyotes kill in one pasture and not in another. 

Changing pastures during these times of loss may reduce 

depredation. Pasture features, like slope, rough or broken 

terrain, brushy cover, and lack of human activity, provide ideal 

conditions for coyotes. Pastures adjacent to streams, creeks, 

or rivers may be more prone to coyote activity since water 

courses serve as coyote hunting and travel corridors. 

Herders/Shepherds

Using herders or shepherds to watch over livestock in large 

pastures can help reduce coyote depredation. If herders are 

not used, daily or periodic checks on the livestock is a good 

animal husbandry practice.

Denning

Coyote depredation can be reduced by locating coyote dens 

(Figure 4) and lethally removing the adults and young of the 

year (known as denning). Denning is prohibited in some 

areas. Check local and state regulations and restrictions. 

Denning may be warranted as a preventive control strategy if 

coyote depredation historically or consistently occurs in a 

particular area. Although denning requires special skills, 

training, and considerable time, the advantages can be 

significant. 

Mated coyote pairs are extremely protective of their territory 

when raising young and will vigorously defend it from other 

coyotes. Coyotes often den year after year in the same 

general location. If a particular denning pair of coyotes has a 

history of existing with and not preying on livestock, it may be 

advantageous to leave them alone. Their removal will open 

up a territory that may become occupied with coyotes that 

could prey on livestock.

Tracking a coyote from a kill site back to its den is one 

method for locating a den site. This can be done by patiently 

observing from a distant vantage point. A trained trailing 

hound also may be useful for this task. If the general area of 

the den is known, use a predator call to imitate a coyote howl. 

This usually solicits a response from any nearby coyote and 

helps determine the den’s location. 

Figure 4. Coyote den.
Aircraft can be used to locate coyote dens when 

depredations occur in spring or early summer. Dens are 

most easily located after young of the year begin venturing 

outside the burrows. Flattened vegetation around the den 

site can make it more visible from the air. If legal at the 

location, the coyotes can be lethally removed through 

aerial operations; otherwise, note the location and return 

on foot or by vehicle.

Once the den is located, approach the den unseen and 

downwind to within calling distance. A call that imitates the 

distress whine of a young coyote can draw out the adults, 

especially when used in conjunction with a speciallytrained dog to act as a lure/decoy. The sound of a young 

coyote in distress, along with the sight of a dog near the 

den causes most coyotes to display highly aggressive 

behavior, frequently chasing the dog and coming out into 

the open where they can be lethally removed with a 

firearm. After the adults are removed, a trained applicator 

can fumigate the den with a large gas cartridge registered 

for this purpose (see Fumigants). 

Exclusion

New materials and designs have made fences an effective 

and economically practical method for preventing coyote 

access to pastures, airport environments, backyards, and 

other areas. However, many factors, including the density, 

behavior and motivation of coyotes, terrain and vegetative 

conditions, availability of other prey, size of pastures, and 

time of year, as well as the fence design, construction, and 

maintenance, will impact the overall effectiveness of a 

fence.

It is unlikely that fences will totally exclude all coyotes from 

an area, especially large areas or ranges; however, fences 

can increase the effectiveness of other damage 

management methods, such as penning livestock, using 

guard animals, and trapping. For example, the combined 

use of livestock protection dogs (LPD) and fencing 

sometimes achieves a greater degree of success than 

either method alone. An electric fence may help keep an 

LPD in and coyotes out of a pasture. If an occasional 

coyote passes through the fence, the LPD can keep it away 

from the livestock and alert the producer by barking.

Fencing can concentrate coyote activity at specific locations, 

such as gateways or ravines, that coyotes use to easily gain 

access to livestock. Set foothold traps and cable devices at 

strategic locations along a fence to effectively capture 

coyotes. 

While beneficial for livestock, fences can pose problems for 

wildlife. In particular, barrier fences may exclude not only 

coyotes, but also many other wildlife. Special attention 

should be made where fencing intersects wildlife travel or 

migration corridors. 

Net-Wire Fencing

Well maintained net-wire or barrier fences deter many 

coyotes from entering a pasture. Horizontal spacing of the 

mesh wire should be less than 6 inches (15 cm), and vertical 

spacing less than 4 inches (10 cm). Digging under a fence 

can be discouraged by placing barbed wire at ground level or 

using a buried wire apron. A fence at least 5.5 feet (ft) (1.6 

meters (m)) high will keep coyotes from jumping over it. 

Climbing can usually be prevented by adding an electrified

wire at the top of the fence or installing a barbed wire 

overhang (Figure 5).

The construction and materials for such fencing can be 

expensive. Therefore, fences of this type are rarely used 

except around small pastures, corrals, feedlots, or areas used 

for temporary confinement.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 7
Page 8 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

Electric Fencing

Modern electric fencing for livestock containment and 

exclusion often is constructed of stretched, smooth, hightensile steel wire and has chargers that maintain high 

output with low impedance which resists grounding and 

minimizes fire hazards. 

Many electric fence designs charge every wire. A charged 

tripwire can also be installed just above the ground about 8

inches (20 cm) outside the main fence to discourage digging 

by animals (Figure 6).

Electric fencing is easiest to install on flat or even terrain. 

Labor to keep electric fencing functional can be significant 

and includes:

• Maintaining wire tension;

• Removing excessive vegetation under the fence to 

prevent grounding;

• Repairing damage from livestock or wildlife;

• Regularly checking the charger to ensure it is operational; 

and 

• Checking for trapped animals inside the fence. These 

animals receive a shock as they enter the pasture and

may subsequently avoid approaching the fence to 

escape. 

In situations where conventional fencing is in good condition, 

adding 1 or 2 charged wires can significantly enhance 

predator deterrence. A charged wire placed 6 to 8 inches (15 

to 23 cm) above the ground at 8 to 10 inches (20 to 25 cm) 

outside of the fence can help to prevent digging by animals. If 

coyotes are climbing or jumping a fence, add charged wires 

to the top or at horizontal levels above the ground. Wires 

should be offset and outside of the fence. 

Portable Electric Fencing

The advent of safe, high-energy chargers (battery or solarpowered) has led to the development of portable electric 

fences. Electric fencing is created with thin strands of wire 

Figure 5. Barrier fence with wire overhang and buried apron. Figure 6. High-tensile electric fence.
running through polyethylene twine or ribbon, called poly-wire 

or poly-tape. The poly-material is available in single and 

multiple wire rolls or as a mesh fence of various heights. It 

can be quickly and easily installed to serve as a temporary 

corral to avoid depredation at places or periods of high risk 

(i.e., at night), to partition off pastures for controlled 

grazing, or to protect threatened or endangered species 

nesting sites (e.g., sea turtles, piping plovers) from 

depredation. Note that range livestock that are not 

accustomed to being fenced may be difficult to contain in a 

portable fence.

Corrals

Confining livestock in a corral at night helps to reduce 

depredation. Adding light, noise, and using an enclosure with 

good structural integrity also increases the effectiveness of 

corrals. Keeping livestock penned on foggy or cloudy days 

may be helpful, as coyotes seem to be more active under 

those conditions.

The potential downsides of using corrals include building 

costs and labor, herding, and feeding livestock. Additionally, 

confined livestock may increase parasite and disease 

problems within the flock or herd.

Fertility Control

No fertility control agent is currently available for use with 

coyotes. Past research on fertility control (e.g., sterilization, 

reproductive inhibitors, and chemical treatments) reveals 

some success in reducing coyote depredation, as treated 

territorial pairs no longer need to provide for young of the 

year. However, the costs may be limiting, and in some 

cases, annual treatment is required. These methods 

remain an area of research, but may not be practical nor 

effective on coyote populations. 

Frightening Devices

Coyotes are often suspicious of novel stimuli and frightening 

devices are most useful for reducing coyote damage during 

short periods of time. Avoid acclimation by varying the 

position, appearance, duration, or frequency of the 

frightening stimuli, or using them in various combinations.

A variety of frightening devices and equipment exists, 

including animated scarecrows, fladry, lights and alarms, 

and propane cannons. Many are battery powered, motionactivated or programmable, and provide a variety of 

sounds or lights to frighten coyotes from the protected 

area. 

Bells and Radios

Some livestock producers place bells on some or all of 

their livestock to discourage predators. Livestock are easily 

located, and the unnatural or unfamiliar sounds associated 

with them may discourage predators. A radio tuned and 

playing a 24-hour station may be a temporary deterrent in 

smaller penned areas or enclosures.

Fladry 

Fladry consists of a line of brightly colored flags hung at 

regular intervals along the perimeter of a pasture. For extra 

protection, the line carrying the flags can be electrified, 

which is known as “turbofladry.” 

Because carnivores are often wary of new items in their 

environment, like fluttering flags, they are cautious about 

crossing the fladry barrier—at least for 3 to 4 months. That 

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 9

Figure 7. A 2019 USDA study showed fladry made with the top-knot design (shown) and 

with flags spaced 11 inches (27.9 cm) apart was the most effective at preventing 

coyotes from crossing a fladry barrier.
Page 10 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

added time of protection may be enough to protect calves 

and lambs during critical periods. The effectiveness may 

be short-lived for coyotes as they are quite adaptable to 

this type of novel stimuli. A 2019 USDA Wildlife Services 

study showed fladry made with a top-knot design and with 

flags spaced 11 inches (27.9 cm) apart was the most 

effective at preventing coyotes from crossing a fladry 

barrier (Figure 7). 

Lights

Lighting can act as a deterrent to coyotes, particularly in 

confined areas, such as corrals. Use daylight sensors or 

timers to activate the lights and reduce electricity costs. 

Revolving, flashing, or strobe lights with motion detectors may 

enhance their effectiveness. 

Propane Cannons

Propane cannons produce loud discharges at timed intervals 

when a spark ignites a measured amount of propane gas. On 

most models, the time between discharges can vary from 1

to 55 minutes. Their effectiveness at frightening coyotes is 

usually temporary, but it can be increased by moving 

cannons to different locations every 3 to 4 days, varying the 

intervals between discharges, and using them in conjunction 

with other frightening devices. In pastures, propane cannons 

should be placed on rigid stands or T-posts. Elevated propane 

cannons reduce the potential for rodent infestations in the 

equipment that could cause malfunctions. Cannons can be 

fitted with timers to allow them to come on at predetermined 

times (e.g., before dark and at daybreak). Depending on 

location especially in relation to neighbors, noise may be a 

consideration.

Scarecrows

Scarecrows, air dancers or similar erect figurines may be 

effective predator frightening devices for short periods of 

time. Adding movement to the figurine increases its 

effectiveness. Air dancers with supplemental lighting may 

be useful as nocturnal frightening devices.

Strobe Lights and Sirens

The USDA Wildlife Services program developed a frightening 

device called the Electronic Guard (EG) (Figure 8). The EG 

consists of a strobe light and siren controlled by a variable 

interval timer that is activated at night with a photoelectric 

cell. In tests conducted in fenced pastures, EGs reduced 

depredation by approximately 89 percent. Most research on 

the effectiveness of EGs has been done with sheep 

operations. EG use differs for pastured versus ranged sheep

operations. Although EGs are no longer manufactured by 

USDA Wildlife Services, similar devices are sold by private 

companies. Tips for using the EG and similar devices with 

fenced and pastured sheep include:

• Placing devices above the ground on fence posts, trees, 

or T-posts so they can be heard and seen at greater 

distances and to prevent livestock from damaging them;

• Positioning devices so that rainwater cannot enter the 

device and cause a malfunction;

Figure 8. Strobe lights and sirens, such as those used in an Electronic 

Guard (shown) and similar devices, reduce livestock depredation 

during short periods of time and have little to no negative impacts on 

livestock behavior. 
• Positioning devices so that light can enter the photocell 

port or window. If positioned in deep shade, the device 

may not turn on or off at the desired times;

• Using at least 2 units in small (<30 acres/12 ha), level, 

short-grass pastures; 3 to 4 units in medium (<100 

acres/40 ha), hilly, tall grass, or wooded pastures; and 

4 to 8 units in larger pastures (>100 acres/40 ha) where 

livestock congregate or bed; and

• Placing devices on high spots, where depredation has 

occurred, at the edge of wooded areas, near or on 

bedding grounds, or near suspected coyote travel 

corridors. The devices should be moved to different 

locations every 10 to 14 days to reduce acclimation.

The number of devices used in open range situations 

depends on the number of livestock and size of their bedding 

grounds. Herders who bed their livestock tightly have better 

results than those who allow bedding over large areas. Tips 

for using the devices with open range or herded livestock

include:

• Using 4 EGs in bedding areas to protect herds of 1,000 

head and their young;

• When possible, placing an EG in the center of the 

bedding ground and others around the edge. Try to place 

the units in suspected coyote travel corridors; and

• Placing EGs on high points, ridge tops, edges of 

clearings, or on high rocks or outcroppings. Hang the 

devices on tree limbs 5 to 7 ft (1.5 to 2.1 m) above 

ground level. If used above timberline or in treeless 

areas, hang them from a tripod of poles.

Vehicles

Coyotes associate vehicles with human activity. Parking cars 

or pickups in areas where losses are occurring may 

temporarily reduce depredation. Effectiveness can be 

improved or extended by frequently moving the vehicles to 

new locations. 

Guarding Animals

The use of guarding animals, such as dogs and donkeys, to 

protect flocks and herds from predators is a common 

nonlethal predation damage management tool. 

Livestock Protection Dogs

Livestock protection dogs (LPDs) have been used for 

centuries to protect livestock, primarily domestic sheep, 

from large carnivores (Figure 9). LPDs are raised and 

trained to stay with livestock without harming them. Their 

protective behaviors are largely instinctive, but proper rearing 

plays a part. LPDs should be acquired from a trained, 

reliable, and professional breeder.

Breeds commonly used as LPDs include the Great Pyrenees, 

Komondor, Anatolian Shepherd, and Akbash. Other Old-World 

breeds include Maremma, Sharplaninetz, and Kuvasz. LPDs 

typically live for about 10 years. Mixed breeds may be 

developed to provide for certain traits or needs. 

USDA Wildlife Services research on the use of three larger 

European LPD breeds (Portuguese Transmontanos, Bulgarian 

Karackachans, and Turkish Kangals) to prevent depredation 

by predators larger than a coyote, such as grizzly bears and 

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 11

Figure 9. Livestock protection dogs (LPDs) have been used for centuries to protect 

livestock from predators.
Page 12 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

wolves, determined that all the breeds successfully, 

protected sheep, but showed different guarding traits 

and behaviors. Producers may want to balance the traits of 

multiple dog breeds by having some that prefer to stand 

guard with the flock and some that seek out and 

investigate potential threats. 

The characteristics of each livestock operation dictates the 

number of dogs required for effective guarding. If coyotes are 

scarce, one dog is sufficient for most fenced pasture 

operations. Range operations often use two dogs per herd of 

livestock. The performance of individual dogs differs based 

on age and experience. 

Coyote density, as well as the size, topography, and habitat of 

the pasture or range must also be considered. Relatively flat, 

open areas can be adequately covered by one dog. When 

brush, timber, ravines and hills are in the pasture, several 

dogs may be needed, particularly if the livestock are 

scattered. Livestock that flock and form a cohesive unit, 

especially at night, can be protected by one dog more 

effectively than livestock that are scattered and bedded in a 

number of locations.

Donkeys

Donkeys or burros are generally docile to people but seem to 

have an inherent dislike for dogs and other canids. The 

typical response of a donkey to an intruding canid may 

include braying, bared teeth, a running attack, kicking, and 

biting. Pasturing a donkey with sheep, goats or other 

compatible livestock can help reduce coyote depredation.

Donkeys are less expensive to obtain and care for than 

LPDs, and may be less prone to accidental death and 

premature mortality. An average lifespan for a donkey is 33 

years. Donkeys can be used with relative safety in 

conjunction with other damage management tools, such as 

cable devices, foothold traps, and toxicants.

For more information about donkeys, see Appendix II. 

Llamas

Like donkeys, llamas have an inherent dislike of canids, and 

a growing number of producers are using llamas to protect 

their livestock. Llamas bond with sheep or goats within hours 

and offer advantages over guarding dogs similar to those 

described for donkeys. The average lifespan for a llama is 20 

years.

Other Animals

Any animal that displays aggressive behavior toward intruding 

coyotes may offer some benefit in deterring depredation. 

Other animals reportedly used for reducing depredation 

include mules, ostriches, and larger breeds of goats. 

The USDA Wildlife Services program tested whether the 

bonding and pasturing of sheep and goats with cattle helped 

to protect them from coyote depredation. Results showed the 

sheep and goats that remained near cattle did receive some 

protection. Whether this protection was the result of direct 

actions by the cattle or by the coyotes’ response to the cattle

is uncertain. Multi-species grazing allows for optimal foraging 

practices and may also help reduce coyote depredation.

Habitat Modification

Modify habitats to eliminate or reduce areas that provide 

cover, resting habitat, or travel corridors for predators. 

Prevent prey species, such as deer, pheasants, rabbits, or 

turkeys from gathering too close to human habitation or 

with livestock. Completely remove dead animal carcasses 

from pastures or bury them deep in place.

Hazing

Hazing (i.e., scaring) coyotes involves people yelling, 

throwing objects or aggressively approaching individual 

coyotes more frequently so that coyotes retain or gain 

more fear of people. It is commonly promoted as a 

nonlethal method to reduce urban coyote conflicts. USDA 

Wildlife Services’ studies with captive coyotes suggest that 

hazed coyotes learn to avoid behaviors, such as getting too 

close to people, that might result in more hazing. 

Additionally, coyotes that were fed or followed by a dog 

were more likely to approach a person even if it resulted in 

hazing. Coyote hazing can work in certain situations, but 

researchers note a coyote’s past experiences with people 

influences the technique’s effectiveness.
Coyotes can be called at any time of the day, although shortly 

after dawn and just before dusk are usually best anywhere 

they are present. Night and thermal vision optics may extend 

predator calling opportunities after dark. Some coyotes come 

to a howl without howling back.

Night Operations

Shooting coyotes at night using thermal vision, night vision, 

or artificial light may be effective. This technology may also be 

useful for observing coyote behavior at night. 

Review all local restrictions or regulations concerning 

discharging a firearm during hours of darkness and the use of 

thermal or night vision equipment. Seasonal restrictions or 

requirements may also exist if night operations are conducted 

during regulated harvest seasons. 

For safety reasons, areas targeted for night operations should 

be scouted in advance during daylight. Create range maps 

with determined distances, locations of occupied or 

unoccupied structures, or terrain features that may hide an 

advancing coyote. Take special note of penned or pastured 

livestock, or the presence of domestic canines. Be familiar 

with the equipment and able to accurately identify coyotes 

during hours of darkness. 

Aerial Operations

The use of aircraft for shooting coyotes is regulated by the 

Airborne Hunting Act and is allowed under special permit in 

states where legal. Aerial operations are very selective, 

allowing for the removal of targeted species. It is an effective 

alternative for removing coyotes that have evaded other 

methods, such as trapping.

Fixed-wing aerial operations is limited primarily to open areas 

with little vegetative cover. Due to their maneuverability,

helicopters are more effective for shooting in areas of brush, 

scattered timber, and rugged terrain.

Although aerial operations can be conducted over bare 

ground, it is most effective with snow cover. Coyotes are 

more visible against a background of snow than green or 

brown vegetation. Their tracks are also more visible in the 

snow. Flying a grid pattern ensures areas are not missed. 

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 13

Repellents

No effective chemical repellents are available to repel 

coyotes. 

Relocation

Capturing and moving animals (also known as relocation) 

is rarely legal nor is it considered a viable solution by 

wildlife professionals for resolving certain wildlife damage 

problems. Reasons to avoid relocating wildlife include legal 

restrictions, disease concerns, liability issues associated 

with injuries or damages caused by a relocated animal, 

stress to the animal, homing behavior, and risk of death to 

the animal. Check state and local regulations before 

considering relocation. 

Shooting

Shooting is a common method for lethally removing coyotes. 

Safety is a critical factor and may preclude the use of 

firearms due to local laws or human habitation. Consider all 

available management options and proceed accordingly. 

The choice of firearm, caliber, and bullet will vary based on 

circumstances in the field. For instance, distance to target is 

important in the selection of the appropriate firearm 

(shotgun or rifle). The accuracy of firearms may be enhanced 

with accessories, such as night vision, illuminated or fiber 

optic sights, adjustable trigger assemblies and stocks, and 

tripods or shooting stands. 

Predator Calling

Predator calling is used to locate coyotes or draw them close 

for shooting purposes. Common sounds used in predator 

calling replicate coyote howling, young coyote whining or 

distress sounds, and prey animal (cottontail, jackrabbit, bird, 

or young ungulates) distress sounds. 

Predator calls can be hand-held and mouth-blown reed calls, 

or recorded sounds amplified through a battery-operated 

player and speaker. Advances in recording and player 

technology have allowed for remote use, and the opportunity 

to select from a variety of stored recordings that create 

realistic sounds. 
Page 14 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

Aerial crews generally fly the grid with the sun at their 

backs, allowing the sunlight to highlight coyotes and other 

ground features.

A ground crew assists with aerial operations. Before the 

aircraft arrives, the ground crew often works to locate coyotes 

in the area by eliciting howls. Two-way radio communication 

allows the ground crew to direct the aircraft toward the sound 

of the coyotes, thus reducing search times. 

Aerial operations require special skills and training for both 

the pilot and gunner. Weather, terrain, and state or local laws 

limit the application of this method. 

Toxicants 

Pesticides are an important component in integrated wildlife 

damage management and their use is regulated by federal 

and state laws. All pesticides used in the United States must 

be registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) under the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, 

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as well as the appropriate 

state agency. Registered pesticides must be used in 

accordance with label directions. Some pesticides can only be 

applied by persons who have been specially trained and 

certified for their use. Each of the chemical methods listed 

below have specific requirements for their handling, transport, 

storage, application, and disposal. 

Three toxicant active ingredients and eleven end-use products 

are registered with the EPA for use with coyotes to reduce 

predation. 

Sodium Cyanide and the M-44

Sodium cyanide is used in the M-44 ejector device (EPA Reg. 

Nos. 56228-15, 35978-1, 35975-2, 39508-1, 33858-2, and 

13808-8; products are all named M-44 Cyanide Capsules). 

EPA Reg. No. 56228-15 can only be used under the 

supervision of the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection 

Service (APHIS), and EPA Reg. Nos. 35978-1, 35975-2, 

39508-1, 33858-2, 13808-8 can only be used under the 

supervision of the state’s department of agriculture. 

The M-44 is a spring-activated device that delivers a dose 

of sodium cyanide powder from the cyanide capsules to a 

coyote. All six M-44 cyanide capsule products are 

registered as Restricted Use Pesticides (RUP) by the EPA 

and can be used only by specially trained certified 

pesticide applicators who must comply with a number of 

product-specific use restrictions designed to protect 

people, domestic animals, and non-target wildlife. 

The M-44 ejector device consists of four parts: a capsule 

holder wrapped with cloth, wool, or other soft material; a 

cyanide capsule (small plastic container holding less than 

1 gram of sodium cyanide); a spring-activated ejector; and 

a 5- to 7-inch tubular stake. In the field, the stake is 

typically inserted with its top near the surface of the 

ground (Figure 10). In specialized circumstances, the top 

may be lower than the surrounding surface (i.e., the device 

is set in a hole or depression) so as not to be stepped 

upon, disturbed by large livestock, or seen by nontarget 

scavenging birds. The cyanide capsule is inserted into its 

holder and screwed onto the ejector. The ejector is placed 

into the stake and secured. Specially formulated bait or 

other attractant, which elicits a "bite and pull" response by 

coyotes, is smeared on the wrapped capsule holder. 

The M-44 device is triggered when a coyote bites and pulls 

on the baited capsule holder, releasing the plunger and 

Figure 10. The M-44 device is staked with its top placed near the surface of the 

ground.
ejecting sodium cyanide powder into the coyote’s mouth. 

The sodium cyanide quickly reacts with moisture in the 

mouth, releasing hydrogen cyanide gas. Death is quick, 

normally within 1 to 5 minutes after the device is triggered. 

While the use of traps or cable devices may present a hazard 

to livestock, M-44s can be used with relative safety in 

pastures where livestock are present. M-44s remain 

operational in adverse weather conditions like rain, snow, and 

freezing temperatures.

Sodium Fluoroacetate and the Livestock Protection Collar

Sodium fluoroacetate (also known as Compound 1080) is

used in the Livestock Protection Collar (LPC) (EPA Reg. Nos. 

56228-22, 39508-2, and 46779-1; products are all named 

Sodium Fluoroacetate (Compound 1080) Livestock 

Protection Collar). In Ohio, EPA Reg. No. 56228-22 can be 

used only by USDA Wildlife Services applicators. EPA Reg. No. 

39508-2 can only be used in New Mexico and EPA Reg. No. 

46779-1 can only be used in Texas.

LPCs are worn around the necks of sheep or goats in a 

group of animals experiencing predation. LPC products are 

one of the most selective methods available to manage 

coyote predation as only the coyote that attacks a sheep or 

goat fitted with an LPC is killed (Figure 11). A coyote must 

bite the prey animal on the neck and puncture one or both 

sodium fluoroacetate reservoir bladders attached to the 

collar to receive the toxicant. The sodium fluoroacetate is 

ingested by the coyote and results in its death.

Typically, only operations with frequent or high depredations 

justify the use of LPCs given the cost of the collars, sacrificed 

livestock, and complying with use restrictions. 

The LPC products are registered by the EPA as a RUP, and 

certified applicators must be specially trained in their use. 

Applicators must follow all label directions and Use 

Restrictions contained in the LPC product’s accompanying 

Technical Bulletin. 

Fumigants

Large gas cartridges (EPA Reg. Nos. 56228-21 and 56228-

62) are products used for denning coyotes. The Large Gas 

Cartridge (EPA Reg. No. 56228-62) can be used by any 

person 16 years old or older. The APHIS-Only Large Gas 

Cartridge (EPA Reg. No. 56228-21) can only be used by 

trained USDA Wildlife Services applicators. Information on 

registration status and availability of these products in 

individual states may be obtained from the respective state’s 

pesticide regulatory agency and from USDA Wildlife Services.

Large gas cartridges are registered, general use fumigant 

products which contain 53% sodium nitrate, 28% charcoal, 

and 19% inert ingredients to produce primarily carbon 

monoxide along with other lethal gases in minor quantities 

when ignited. A cartridge is lighted, placed as deep as 

possible within the coyote den, and the den opening is sealed. 

Death occurs when the lethal gasses are inhaled. Care 

should be taken to plug dens with nonflammable material, 

typically soil or rocks, to minimize the chance of nearby 

grasses and leaf litter from catching fire. Gas cartridges 

also may be used to euthanize coyotes that flee down a 

hole during aerial operations.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 15

Figure 11. The Livestock Protection Collar (LPC) is one of the most selective 

methods available to manage coyote predation on sheep and goats—only the 

coyote that attacks a sheep or goat fitted with an LPC is killed. 
Page 16 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

Trapping

Trapping describes foothold traps, cage traps, and cable 

devices commonly used to capture coyotes. Foothold and 

cage traps are designed to live-capture coyotes. Cable 

devices are designed to either live-capture or lethally 

remove coyotes. 

Trapping rules and regulations vary by state. Consult local 

laws and regulations prior to using any traps or cable 

devices.

Trapper education programs exist in many states. This 

training may be required prior to receiving a trapper’s 

license and actively trapping. Check with the local state 

agency for requirements and training opportunities. If none 

exist, the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (AFWA) 

and some states offer online training. 

Foothold Traps

For more information on the use of foothold traps, please 

see Appendix III. 

Foothold traps should be purchased from reliable trap 

manufacturers or supply outlets. Foothold traps for coyotes 

vary in size and strength, allowing for use with different 

sized animals (e.g., eastern coyotes [larger] versus western 

coyotes) and environmental conditions (e.g., soil, moisture, 

and temperature). 

Common foothold trap sizes for coyotes range from #11⁄2 

(small) to #4 (large) and use either coiled springs or double 

long springs. There are no manufacturing standards for 

correlating these numbered foothold traps with their 

dimensional measurements. Attributes like jaw spread, 

spring strength, and stock nomenclature vary between 

manufacturers. AFWA continues extensive research with 

foothold traps, using criteria to measure the effects on 

animal welfare, selectivity, efficiency, practicality, and 

safety. Refer to the guides Best Management Practices: 

Trapping Coyotes in the Eastern United States or Best 

Management Practices: Trapping Coyotes in Western 

United States for recommended sizes and measurements 

(Figure 12). 

Coyotes are very strong, long legged, and often lunge while 

restrained. Proper foothold traps for restraining coyotes 

include the following characteristics: 

• Offset, laminated, or padded jaws (Figure 13): Offset 

jaws provide a space that allows for the mass of the 

coyote’s foot. Offset and laminated jaws provide a 

wider contact surface, which displaces the closing 

pressure over a larger area. Padded jaws have a 

replaceable rubber surface;

• 4 lbs (1.8 kg) of pan tension: Pan tension is measured 

by applying a known weight to the trap pan to allow the 

trap jaws to close. Using 4 lbs of pan tension allows 

the foothold trap to be more selective for coyotes and 

prevents smaller animals from being captured. It 

increases the opportunity for a good foot pad catch 

and reduces the potential for injuries and accidental 

releases. Testing devices are commercially available 

Figure 12. The Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies provides online 

guides to best management practices for trapping.
from reliable trapping supply dealers. Pan tension is 

typically increased or decreased by adjusting the nut 

and bolt that attach the trap pan to the trap base 

plate; 

• An anchoring chain mounted to the center of the 

foothold trap baseplate: Any pulling pressure applied 

to the foothold trap is in direct line with the anchor. 

This direct line reduces the potential for injury by 

preventing the coyote’s restrained foot from sliding 

between the foothold trap’s jaws;

• An anchoring chain with multiple in-line swivels: 

Swivels allow the foothold trap to turn freely in any 

direction and prevents binding which may cause injury 

to the restrained foot; and

• An anchoring chain with a shock spring: A shock spring 

lessens the impact of a sudden stop if a coyote lunges 

while attempting to get free. Shock springs that can 

handle 50 to 100 lbs (22 to 45 kg) of pressure are 

typically used for coyotes.

Foothold traps set for coyotes are secured with a single 

stake or double stake system; earth anchors; or drags 

(Figure 14). The soil conditions generally determine what 

anchoring system is used. Drags are typically used instead 

of in-ground anchors in sandy or loose soils or to allow the 

restrained coyote some movement to seek shelter. 

Drags commonly use 6 to 10 ft (2 to 3 m) of chain between 

the foothold trap and the drag. The drag and chain are 

attached to the anchoring chain of the foothold trap. Drags 

should be designed to leave marks or a trail so the 

restrained coyote can easily be found. 

Cage Traps

Cage traps used for coyotes should be at least 48 inches 

(1.2 m) long, 16 inches (40 cm) wide, and 23 inches (58 

cm) high. Darken the cage trap’s wire with paint or dye, use 

vegetation to break up the outline of the trap, and line the 

floor of the trap with dirt or vegetation to improve trapping 

success. Pre-baiting the cage trap with common food items 

which will be used during actual trapping may also help. 

Encouraging a coyote into a cage trap is very difficult. Most 

coyotes are wary of novel objects. Cage traps may be more 

successful in urban or suburban environments where 

coyotes are more accustomed to human activity and 

human-made objects. 

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 17

Figure 13. Foothold trap configurations: a) fully modified foothold trap 

with center mounted anchoring chain, multiple swivels, and an in-line 

shock spring; b) offset jaws; c) laminated jaws; and d) rubber padded 

jaws.

Figure 14. A drag is often used when loose soil conditions prevent the use of inground anchors.
Page 18 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

Cable Devices

For more information on the use of cable devices, please 

see Appendix IV. 

Cable devices (or snares) may be designed and set to 

either live-capture or lethally remove coyotes. 

Cable devices are not legal in all states. Where legal, states 

may define the component requirements, measurements, 

setting restrictions, and training requirements. Consult local 

laws and regulations prior to using cable devices and acquire 

legal cable devices from a knowledgeable and reliable 

manufacturer. Carefully select sites where snares are set to 

avoid capturing nontarget animals, such as dogs.

Unlike other capture tools, cable devices cannot be reused. 

Once a capture is made, the stress applied to the cable 

makes it unusable. Some cable device components may 

be removed and re-used, but the cable itself cannot. 

Cable devices are used to capture an unsuspecting coyote 

as it is traveling on its commonly used trails (known as 

“trailing”). Check the trail for recent tracks. If present, 

place the cable device set where the trail narrows. 

Approach the location from the side of the trail to prevent 

unnecessary disturbance to the site. Position the cable 

device’s loop in the center of the trail, so the coyote places 

its head through it as it travels along the trail (Figure 15). 

The support wire needs to hold the loop tightly and be 

sturdy and stiff enough to handle wind and other weather 

factors. Nine or 11 gauge wire is commonly used for 

support wire (Figure 16). A moving cable device can easily

be detected by an animal or may cause the height and loop

size to change. A cable loop that has fallen may catch a 

nontarget animal or may catch a coyote by the foot. Pay 

attention to conditions that may change or alter the cable 

devices and visit the sets regularly to check them.

Most cable devices are passive capture methods that are 

only activated by an animal moving through the loop and 

causing it to close. However, some systems are springloaded. When an animal trips the trigger, a compressed 

spring propels the cable loop around an animal’s foot or 

neck (See Appendix IV). Spring-loaded foot cable devices 

are commonly used in lieu of foothold traps in states where 

foothold traps have been banned. 

Avoid using lure or urine close to a cable device set, with the 

exception of foot cable devices.Odors cause a coyote to

investigate, become cautious, or behave differently. The

coyote’s head will not be in line with the body, they may stop 

or walk in circles to investigate, and depending on their 

status in the area or experiences, they may leave.

Set locations should be on straight runs in the trail, not 

curves or changes in direction. Look for a narrowing in the 

Figure 15. A properly suspended cable device loop with 9 gauge wire.

Figure 16. A cable device loop support wire made with 9 gauge wire. This set is for a 

lethal cable device because of the woody rooted vegetation that provides for 

entanglement.
trail. Avoid setting on uphill and downhill parts of a trail—

regardless of which way the coyote is traveling, its head will 

not be in a good position to enter the cable device’s loop. 

For trails that traverse side hills, anchor the cable device 

on the downhill side of the trail. A captured coyote will 

naturally work against the anchor downhill and provide 

little disturbance to the original set location. This becomes 

useful when another set may be needed.

Cable devices must be solidly anchored to an immovable 

object. This is imperative for a breakaway component to 

function properly, thus allowing the release of large, nontarget animals. A breakaway component is any mechanism 

incorporated into a cable device that allows the loop to 

disassemble when a specified amount of pressure is 

applied. Do not use drags to anchor cable devices as there 

is no assurance that the drag will catch on an immovable 

object. Fence crossings make excellent set locations for 

cable devices, but fencing wire should not be used as an 

anchor as it moves when pulled. 

Flag or record each set location with colored survey ribbon 

as cable devices easily blend in with the natural 

surroundings (Figure 17). Wind can move vegetation 

around, and snow can change the appearance of the 

landscape. If flagging is secured to vegetation, make sure it 

is removed when the set is removed. Place flagging adjacent 

to the set, not directly above it. In some areas, flagging can 

attract people who may disable or take the devices.

Restraining Cable Device: Restraining cable devices are 

excellent tools for live-capturing coyotes. This restraint 

system is a good choice for use in urban and suburban 

environments, or any location where domestic dogs may be 

captured. Live restraints have been used effectively for 

resolving wildlife conflicts and capturing animals for 

research.

Restraining cable devices incorporate a relaxing lock. The 

relaxing lock allows the cable’s loop to tighten with tension,

but it does not keep its place on the cable and will move 

slightly backward when tension stops. Relaxing locks are 

made so that when assembled, the cable passes through 

the lock to make the cable loop smaller or larger. The passthrough holes are slightly larger, allowing the lock to slide

freely on the cable. Even though the lock can move slightly 

in either direction on the cable, an animal cannot shed the 

loop from its neck.

When setting a restraining cable device, choose set 

locations that are free of objects that could cause 

entanglement, such as trees, fences, machinery, and any 

woody, rooted vegetation larger than 1⁄2 inch (1.2 cm) in 

diameter. 

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 19

Figure 17. Colored survey flagging threaded through the center of hinged 

clothespins works well for keeping cable devices organized and identifying 

set locations. Attach one to each coiled cable device when storing the cable; 

remove it and attach it to nearby vegetation or another structure to identify 

the set location once the cable device is set; and recover when the cable 

device is removed. 

Figure 18. An example of a catch circle with a cable device.
traveling coyotes to visit. Some may come to eat, smell

identifiers (like urine or scat) left by other coyotes or leave

scat or urine of their own.

Once coyote sign is found at a draw station, backtrack to 

the coyotes’ entrance and exit trails and choose set 

locations as far from the draw station as possible (i.e., 100 

to 500 yds (91 to 457 m) are recommended). Consider the 

following when making a draw station trap set:

• Making sets too close to the draw station may reduce 

their effectiveness. The closer a coyote gets to a draw 

station, the more alert it becomes. It is their intent not 

to surprise or be surprised by another coyote at the 

same location. An alert coyote behaves differently than 

a trailing coyote and may result in a poor catch or no 

catch.

• Setting traps or cable devices too close to a draw 

station increases the potential for catching non-target 

animals, such as raptors and scavengers that may visit 

the site. It is common for birds to land in the open and 

walk 10 to 50 yds (9 to 45 m) to reach a draw station. 

Using Dogs

Trained dogs often assist in coyote damage management. A 

well-trained dog can help locate appropriate places to set 

capture devices by alerting their handlers to areas where 

target animals have traveled, urinated, or defecated. 

Trained dogs can also aid in the application of other 

methods by detecting individuals, dens, or attracting coyotes 

into shooting range. Properly trained and disciplined dogs 

should not make contact with coyotes and have minimal 

effect on non-target animals. 

Handling and Euthanasia

Wear protective equipment (i.e., gloves, safety glasses) 

when handling live or dead coyotes. Avoid contact with 

claws, teeth, blood, saliva, urine, or feces. 

Coyotes captured in restraining devices may need to be 

transported to a different location for euthanasia. A 

Page 20 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

Restraining cable devices are approximately 5 ft (1.5 m) in 

length and limit an animal’s free reign when captured. If 

this “catch circle” (Figure 18) is not free of objects, an 

animal will be able to wrap the cable tight against them 

and become entangled. When this occurs, the lock cannot

relax, and the animal will asphyxiate. Restraining cable

devices should be checked daily as they are not designed to 

hold live coyotes for long periods of time. 

Lethal Cable Device: Lethal cable devices include a nonrelaxing lock. This lock allows the loop of the device to

tighten with tension but prevents it from loosening when the 

tension stops. 

Many modern cable devices incorporate a small 

compression or torsion spring that puts pressure on the 

lock to bind it more securely against the cable. 

Set lethal cable devices in areas with natural objects that 

can cause entanglement and restrict movement, like small 

trees or brush, or add an entanglement object. An example 

of an entanglement object is a -inch (1.2 cm) diameter 

or larger 4 ft (1.2 m) long re-rod stake. These are 

commonly called “tangle rods” and are used to support the 

cable loop and anchor the device. If a captured coyote is 

allowed free reign it may apply great stress to the cable 

device, causing a component to fail or providing time for 

the coyote to chew through the cable. 

Draw Stations

Draw stations are locations that may already exist (e.g., 

carcass disposal sites) or are created by adding lure or bait 

to increase coyote interest and activity in an area. A draw

station may be something as simple as lure on a piece of

hide hung in a tree, a road-killed animal (legally possessed), 

or carcasses from previous trapping efforts. Moving dead 

livestock is generally restricted by state law. Landowner 

permission is required if wild animal carcasses are brought 

onto the property. Check state trapping regulations 

regarding the use of draw stations and certain baits. 

The longer a draw station is in place, the more coyote 

activity it will receive. The draw station is a place for 
catchpole and large cage trap will aid in the removal and 

transport of an animal from the device. 

When working with a restrained coyote, move slowly and 

deliberately. Speak in a calm voice. Place a hood or towel 

over an anesthetized coyote’s eyes to reduce stress. Keep 

a live coyote cool or in a shaded area to avoid heat-related 

injury. 

The American Veterinary Medical Association provides 

guidelines for euthanizing animals with firearms. Captured 

coyotes are commonly euthanized with a well-placed shot 

to the brain using a hollow-point bullet from a .22 rimfire 

cartridge (or of equivalent or greater velocity and muzzle 

energy). 

Euthanasia drugs, such as a solution of pentobarbital and 

phenytoin, can also be administered by trained specialists. 

Disposal

Follow local and state regulations regarding carcass 

disposal. In some disease-related cases, deep burial or 

incineration may be warranted. When removing coyotes 

with restricted use pesticides, follow label instructions for 

proper carcass disposal. Care must also be taken with the 

disposal of carcasses that contain euthanasia drugs. Deep 

burial or incineration is required to avoid secondary 

hazards to animals that may feed on the carcass.

Economics

Coyotes cause considerable damage to livestock and 

natural resources in the United States. For example, even 

with coyote damage management programs in place, 

livestock producers lose in excess of $115 million in 

livestock annually to coyotes. 

The value of livestock killed, or the reduced value of 

injured livestock represents a small fraction of the 

actual costs of predation. Other damage costs include 

looking for injured or dead livestock, disposing of dead 

livestock, caring for livestock injured or exhausted as a 

result of being pursued or attacked, and obtaining 

replacement animals. 

Coyote damage management implementation costs are 

additive to the direct damage costs. From 2000 to

2015, the percentage of U.S. cattle operations using 

nonlethal methods to control predators increased from 

approximately 3 to 19 percent. For an overview of 

coyote predation impacts and use of nonlethal damage 

management tools by livestock type, see Table 2. 

Coyote predation or damage in urban and suburban 

settings is also expensive and includes costs associated 

with implementing management methods for aggressive 

or nuisance coyotes, protecting and/or replacing exotic 

or heritage livestock, and addressing disease related 

concerns. 

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 21

Livestock 

Type 

Percentage of predatorrelated losses due to 

coyotes 

Use of Nonlethal 

Damage Management 

Tools 

Cattle 40.5% cattle

53.1% calves

Producers spent an 

average of $3,000 and 

$300 on nonlethal and 

lethal tools, respectively 

Goats 65% goats and kids

(represents losses from 

coyotes and dogs)

Producers spent an 

average of $1,085 and 

$444 on nonlethal and 

lethal tools, respectively

Sheep 54.3% sheep

63.7% lambs

58% of producers used 

1 or more nonlethal 

tools, such as fencing, 

guard dogs, lambing 

sheds, and night 

penning

Table 2. Coyote predation impacts and the use of nonlethal damage 

management tools by livestock type from USDA National Animal Health 

Monitoring System reports (2014 goat data, 2015 cattle and sheep data).
Coyote predation can be costly when it impacts recovery 

efforts of highly valued endangered and threatened birds, 

mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and insects. Threatened 

or endangered species protection programs should 

consider coyote predation when these species share the 

same habitats, and budget for the necessary costs of 

prevention or removal. 

Species Overview

Identification

Coyotes belong to the Order Carnivora in the Family 

Canidae, along with domestic dogs, wolves, foxes, and 

jackals (Figure 19). 

Physical Description

Coyotes vary in size. Those from eastern regions of North 

America are larger and heavier (30 to 38 lbs /13.6–17.2 

kg), than those from the west (20 to 35 lbs /9–15.8 kg). 

The genealogy of the eastern coyote includes a 

hybridization with wolves and dogs resulting in the slightly 

larger size. Adult male coyotes are generally larger than 

adult females. Pelt colorations range from near white to 

black. Some color phases include red and orange.

Coyotes have excellent hearing, sense of smell, and eyesight. 

They have pointed ear tips and a pointed nose. The 

distance from the top of a coyote’s back to the bottom of 

its chest is equal distance from the bottom of its chest to 

the ground. Coyotes differ from wolves in that wolves have 

rounded ear tips and a square nose, and have 

proportionally much longer legs compared to a coyote. 

Coyotes have been measured running at speeds of up to 40 

miles per hour (64 kilometers (km) per hour) and can sustain 

slower speeds for several miles.

Range

Coyotes occur across most of North America from the edge 

of the northern tundra to Central America. In the United 

States, all 48 contiguous states and Alaska have coyote 

populations, though densities vary with habitat quality. 

Tracks 

Coyote tracks contain four toes with claws and a heel pad. 

The track impression is longer than it is wide. Both front 

and rear feet have the same shape, but the rear track may 

appear slightly smaller than the front (Figure 20). Coyotes 

Page 22 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

Figure 19. Coyotes are members of the canid family. Figure 20. Coyote tracks. Note the front track (top) is larger than the rear 

(bottom). Image not to scale.
carry their weight forward, resulting in a larger front 

track. 

Front foot tracks average 2 inches (5 cm) wide by 2.5 

inches (6.3 cm) in length. The rear foot track averages 

1.5 inches (3.8 cm) wide by 2 inches (5 cm) in length. 

Track impressions vary with animal weight and soil or 

substrate conditions. It is best to obtain several 

observations and measurements over a greater area to 

make an accurate identification. 

Tracks made by the front feet show the third toenail 

(counting from the inside to the outside of the foot) 

slightly longer than the others. The heel pad contains 

three lobes. The heel pads on the rear feet tend to have 

convex center lobes which cause the lobes on either 

side to disappear in the track. This knowledge may be 

useful in determining a front or rear foot impression. 

Tracks in a single file represent a walking gait; tracks in 

a two-step (one track partially over another) represent a 

side trot; and a track pattern resembling a “T” (where 

the back feet surpass the front feet) represent a gallop. 

The walking and side trot gaits may measure 17 to 25 

inches (43 to 63 cm) between the same foot-track in 

that pattern. When observed, the distance between the 

left and right tracks (straddle) is approximately 5 inches 

(12.7 cm). The track of eastern coyotes may be slightly 

larger and the distance between track impressions of a 

traveling coyote slightly longer.

Sign

Coyotes will urinate on elevated clumps of grass, dirt, 

old carcass parts, small waste grain piles, or other 

similar material as a method of communication. These 

locations are obvious when snow is present, less when 

surface conditions are dry or hard. Look for evidence of 

scratch-ups (i.e., surface scratching or kick-ups done by 

the rear feet) adjacent or close to where the urine was 

deposited. Similarly, scat (feces) may also be found on 

gravel roads or trails and at trail junctions. Visiting 

coyotes may also leave their urine and scat on top of or 

adjacent to previous deposits.

Scat segments (i.e., cords) vary in shape and size 

depending on diet and the size of the coyote (Figure 21). 

Segments are slightly tapered at the ends and may 

measure 2 to 5 inches (5 to 12.7 cm) in length. The cords 

may be folded and the last segment to be deposited will be 

pointed. Examine fresh segments to determine the diet. 

Items that may pass through the coyote’s digestive system 

include hair, bone fragments, exoskeletal segments of 

insects, fruit pits or seeds, blades of grass, artificial 

materials (plastic) or other items. Scat containing 

unidentifiable dense black material and a disagreeable 

odor is heavy in animal protein, indicating a recent diet of 

meat. 

Voice and Sounds

Coyotes communicate through a variety of vocalizations. In 

a relaxed and safe environment, coyotes will whine and 

growl in several low tones which have very different 

meanings. Some may serve to gain attention while others 

serve to create avoidance. Barking generally serves to gain 

attention or announce danger. Howling communicates 

location, which sometimes draws others to howl from their 

location. Howling can communicate a single coyote 

searching for others or may define an occupied home 

range. Howling sessions may include a series of barks, 

yips, whines, and howls. When this occurs, the listener may 

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 23

Figure 21. Coyote scat. Note red hair from feeding on a red Angus calf. 
be led to believe there are many more coyotes than are 

actually present. Two coyotes can easily sound like six. Pup 

distress whines and yelps are a typical vocalization for subdominant coyotes when being chased, injured, harassed, 

or attacked by others. 

Reproduction

Coyotes usually breed in February and March, with gestation 

being 60 to 63 days. Females sometimes breed during the 

winter following their birth, particularly if food is plentiful. 

Females may have been bred by more than one male. 

Average litter size is 5 to 7 young. More than one litter may 

be found in a single den; at times these may be from females 

mated to a single male. Coyotes are capable of hybridizing 

with dogs and wolves, but breeding opportunities are rare and 

individual species’ behaviors make it difficult.

Adult male and female coyotes provide food to their young for 

several weeks. Other adults associated with the denning pair 

may also provide food and care to the young. 

Juveniles begin emerging from their den by three weeks of 

age, and within two months they follow adults to large prey or 

carrion. Juveniles are usually weaned by six weeks of age 

and will be moved to larger quarters with less structure than 

a den hole. The family group usually remains together until 

late summer or fall, when juveniles may disperse. Juveniles 

may be found in loose family groups until the following 

breeding season begins.

Dens

Coyotes prefer a below-ground cavity for a den site. If that 

is unavailable, they may resort to any protected area like 

brush or rock piles, under or in abandoned buildings, 

haystacks, or any similar object that will provide shelter 

from the weather and some level of security.

Coyotes may have several den sites, some interconnected. 

Coyotes will move to a different den, if circumstances 

occur that threaten the safety and security of the den or 

young (e.g., infestation of fleas, recent human activity in 

the area). 

Page 24 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

Rural den locations are generally located on an elevated 

piece of ground, facing south, with water nearby. An 

entrance is approximately 12 inches (30 cm) wide. The 

opening is generally taller than it is wide. The entrance 

may be larger if the den has been used for consecutive 

seasons. The depth and cavities within the den site vary 

based on the adult’s experience and material in which 

the den is created. Den site openings may be littered 

with indigestible prey parts, bone fragments, small 

skulls, and wings or feathers. 

Mortality

Mortality is highest during the first year of a coyote’s life, 

and few survive for more than 12 years in the wild. Human 

activity is often the greatest single cause of coyote 

mortality.

Adult coyotes have few natural predators, but juveniles 

are killed or eaten by feral dogs, mountain lions, and 

golden eagles. Wolves prey upon coyotes to reduce 

competition in overlapping habitats. Coyotes may die 

from injuries by bears, lions, and wolverines while 

scavenging at kill sites, but are rarely preyed upon in 

those situations. Coyotes have been known to feed on 

other coyote carcasses during times of severe stress, 

such as extremely cold temperatures. 

Coyote populations are also impacted by zoonotic 

diseases, such as rabies (Lyssavirus), canine parvovirus 

(Parvovirinae), heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis), and 

canine distemper (Paramyxoviridae). Rabies continues 

to be addressed in some regions of the United States by 

using treated baits to vaccinate coyotes.

Parasites

Tapeworms (Echinococcosis granulosus) and stomach 

roundworms (Toxocara canis) are common in coyotes. 

Coyotes host ectoparasites like chewing lice 

(Trichodectes canis), ticks (Ixodes dammini, 

Dermacentor variabilis, Dermacentor andersoni, and 

Rhipicephalus sanguineus), fleas (Ctenocephalides 

canis), and mites (Sarcoptes scabiei). Ticks transmit 
Lyme’s disease and Rocky Mountain spotted fever; fleas 

spread tapeworm (Dipylidium caninum); and mites inflict 

sarcoptic mange. Although parasites may not be the direct 

cause of death, the effect of parasites on the coyote’s 

immune system and overall health or body condition may 

be fatal. Hyperthermia, hypothermia, and pneumonia are 

common causes of death related to compromised immune 

systems due to parasites.

Coyotes can be a definitive host for Neospora caninum 

which can cause abortion and neonatal mortality in cattle. 

Thick-walled spores called oocysts are passed in coyote 

scat and ingested by cattle feeding on infected materials 

(e.g., ground feed, hay, stored haylage, and pasture 

grasses). Neonatal infection occurs causing abortion or calf 

death within the womb. This parasite affects sheep and 

dogs in the same manner. 

Population Status

Coyote populations vary across the country and are 

considered abundant. Coyote densities are highly variable 

depending on the time of year, habitat quality, and region. 

Habitat

Originally an inhabitant of the open grasslands and prairies 

of the western United States and southern Canada, the 

coyote has adapted to a wide range of habitat conditions 

from southern swamps to northern spruce-fir forests. 

Coyotes occur in urban and suburban environments, 

including some of the largest cities in North America. 

Behavior

Most coyotes are gregarious. When conditions and 

individual coyote behavior allows, family groups may 

loosely remain together and exhibit social structure. An 

alpha pair determines the context of the group and 

what individual behaviors are tolerated. The alpha pair 

mark their territory by defecating, urinating, or making 

scratch-ups, and are most aggressive to intruding 

coyotes. Other coyotes within the group may share 

these responsibilities and mimic this behavior. 

Juvenile coyotes most often show gestures of submission, 

such as tucking their tail between their rear legs, turning 

their head, lowering eyes, skulking, showing their belly, and 

whining when in the company of adults. Aggressive 

gestures during adult coyote confrontations include pinned 

back ears, showing of teeth, arched back with a stiffened 

grotzen, and growling or snarling.

In the spring and summer, most coyotes limit their 

movements to a small area due to birthing and rearing of 

their young. Individual or unpaired coyotes are not restricted 

to such duties and continue roaming as needed during this 

time. Coyotes may roam over larger areas in late summer, 

fall, and winter. Coyotes follow regular travel corridors and 

trails and prefer slight elevations from which to view the 

surrounding area. 

Primarily nocturnal, coyotes may be active during the day. 

They are most active during the hours near sunrise and 

sunset. This is especially true during hot summer months and 

where there is a lot of human activity. Where there is minimal 

human interference and during cool weather, coyotes may be 

active throughout the day. Coyotes bed in sheltered areas 

and do not generally use dens except when raising young. A 

bedded coyote usually has the wind at its back and observes 

the area downwind. They may seek shelter underground 

during severe weather or when closely pursued. Coyotes are 

excellent swimmers and have little difficulty crossing 

bodies of water or rivers. 

The home range of a coyote is defined as the area it 

routinely visits during a 7-day period. Home range size is 

heavily dependent upon food and suitable habitat. Coyote 

densities are generally higher when food resources are 

abundant. Home ranges may be 4 to 15 square miles (6.4 

to 16 km2). Coyotes may explore and occupy much larger 

areas in search of food, water, new home ranges, or during 

the breeding season. Home ranges are fluid for most of the 

year. Under normal conditions, coyotes are tolerant of each 

other and many work to avoid direct confrontation with 

others. 

A coyote’s territory is defined as the area that is defended 

from other coyotes or other animals. Territories become 

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 25
well defined when pairs are mated, den sites chosen, and 

when rearing young. During these times, the size of the 

territory is determined by the adult pair’s tolerance for 

other coyotes. Offending coyotes are generally discouraged 

through vocalizations, body gestures, or being aggressively 

run off. The territory is smaller and more closely guarded 

when young of the year are within a den site, but becomes 

larger as the young grow and venture out with the adults. 

Territory size varies and is heavily dependent upon the 

available habitat (food, water, shelter, and space). Territory 

size may be as small as 0.25 to 0.56 square miles (0.4 to 

0.9 km2), and as large as 1.2 to 2.9 square miles (1.9 to 

4.6 km2) in more open areas. 

Coyotes that occupy urban and suburban areas are often 

less wary of people and may kill and/or eat domestic pets, 

and attack people. Coyotes vary their activity based on 

human interactions and perceived threat levels. Coyotes 

learn from past events that were unpleasant or frightening, 

and often avoid such events in the future. 

Food Habits

Coyotes are omnivores and opportunists, feeding on a variety 

of seasonal offerings—carrion, rodents, rabbits, birds, reptiles, 

ungulates (usually fawns), insects, feces, livestock, poultry, 

fruits, berries, and other plants and animals. Urban and 

suburban dwelling coyotes may also feed on human garbage, 

pets, domestic pet food, garden produce, and birdseed. 

Coyotes are capable of catching and killing all ages of healthy 

domestic livestock but generally take prey that is the easiest 

to secure. Prey selection is based on opportunity and a 

myriad of behavioral cues. For example, strong, healthy lambs 

are often taken from a flock by a coyote even though smaller, 

weaker lambs are also present. Stronger lambs may spend 

more time on the periphery of the flock and are more active, 

making them more prone to attack than weaker lambs that 

are at the center of the flock and less active.

Page 26 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

Legal Status

The legal status of coyotes varies from state to state. In 

some states, coyotes are protected except during the 

regulated hunting and trapping seasons. Provisions may 

exist for landowners or operators to remove coyotes to 

resolve predation. In other states, coyotes may be 

classified as a predator or as an unprotected species and 

may be taken year-round. Check local and state 

regulations for information on seasons, bag limits, and 

types of capture devices or methods that can be used.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Page 27

Figure 1. Photo by Kevin Keirn

Figure 2. Photo by National Park Service

Figure 3. Photos by USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services and USDA Jean Bonhotal 

Figure 4, 15, 17, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28. Photos by Rick Tischaefer, USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services 

Figure 5, 6. Graphics from The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage. Coyotes. By Jeffrey S. Green, F. 

 Robert Henderson, and Mark D. Collinge. September 1994. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Page C-55.

Figure 7, 8, 11. Photos by USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services

Figure 9. Photo by Michael Marlow, USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services 

Figure 10. Photo by Gail Keirn, USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services

Figure 12. Graphic by the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

Figure 13, 20, 22, 23, 27. Graphics by Joe Goodman in concert with the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

Figure 14. Graphics by Joe Goodman in concert with the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies and The Handbook:

 Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage. Coyotes. By Jeffrey S. Green, F. Robert Henderson, and Mark

 D. Collinge. September 1994. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Page C-55.

Figure 16. Graphic by Joe Goodman in concert with the North Dakota Cooperative Fur Harvester Education Program

Figure 18. Graphic by Natalene Cummings in concert with the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

Figure 19. Photo by Tom Koerner, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

We thank Stewart Breck, Jeremy Duckwitz, Lauren Mastro, and Nathan Roberts for providing critical reviews of this 

manuscript. 

Acknowledgements
Page 28 WDM Technical Series─Coyotes

Glossary

Alpha: The highest-ranking individual in a social group. 

Other animals in the same social group may exhibit 

deference or other species-specific subordinate behavior 

towards the alpha or alphas. 

Catch Circle: The disturbed area where a captured coyote 

is restrained.

Definitive Host: An organism in which a parasite reaches 

maturity and reproduces. 

Denning: The practice of seeking out the dens of 

depredating coyotes and lethally removing the young and 

adults. 

Drag: A type of anchoring system that allows a trapped 

animal to move a short distance and reach cover or 

shelter. 

Fladry: A simple, nonlethal tool used to prevent livestock 

predation. It consists of a line of brightly colored flags hung 

at regular intervals along the perimeter of a pasture. 

Grotzen: The long guard hairs of the mane and top of the 

shoulders.

Homing Behavior: An animal’s ability to return to the 

location where it was originally captured following 

relocation or translocation. 

Necropsy: An animal autopsy. 

Novel Stimuli: An exposure to something never before seen 

or experienced.

Omnivore: Animal that eats both plants and animals. 

Set: Where and how a trap or capture device is placed. 

Set Location: The exact spot where a trap or capture device 

is placed.

Sign: Items indicating animal presence in an area; may 

include tracks, tufts of fur or hair, scat, teeth or claw 

marks, etc. 

Keywords

Canids, Canis latrans, Coyote, Livestock, Predation

Citation

Tischaefer, R. 2020. Coyotes. Wildlife Damage 

Management Technical Series. USDA, APHIS, WS National 

Wildlife Research Center. Fort Collins, Colorado. 42p.

Disclaimer

Wildlife can threaten the health and safety of you and 

others in the area. Use of damage prevention and control 

methods also may pose risks to humans, pets, livestock, 

other non-target animals, and the environment. Be aware 

of the risks and take steps to reduce or eliminate those 

risks. 

Some methods mentioned in this document may not be 

legal, permitted, or appropriate in your area. Read and 

follow all pesticide label recommendations and local 

requirements. Check with personnel from your state 

wildlife agency and local officials to determine if methods 

are acceptable and allowed. 

Mention of any products, trademarks, or brand names 

does not constitute endorsement, nor does omission 

constitute criticism. 
Page 29

Resources

American Veterinary Medical Association Guidelines for Euthanasia of Animals. 2020 Edition. American Veterinary Medical 

Association. Schaumberg, Illinois. 121 pp.

Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 2006. Best Management Practices for Trapping in the United States –

Introduction. Washington DC: Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 13 pp.

Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 2019. Best Management Practices for Trapping Coyotes in the Eastern United 

States. Washington DC: Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 21 pp. 

Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 2019. Best Management Practices for Trapping Coyotes in the Western United 

States. Washington DC: Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 17 pp. 

Bekoff, M. and E.M. Gese. 2003. Coyote (Canis latrans). Pages 467-481 in Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, 

Management, and Conservation, 2nd Edition. Edited by G.A. Feidhammer, B.C. Thompson, and J.A. Chapman. John Hopkins 

University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

Breck, S.W., S.A. Poessel, and M.A. Bonnell. 2017. Evaluating lethal and nonlethal management options for urban 

coyotes. Human-Wildlife Interactions 11(2):133-145. doi: digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol11/iss2/4 

Bromley, C. and E.M. Gese. 2001. Surgical sterilization as a method of reducing coyote predation on domestic sheep. 

Journal of Wildlife Management 65(3):510-519. 

Constable, P.D., Hinchcliff, K.W., Done, S.H., and W. Grunberg. 2017. Veterinary Medicine, 11th Edition—A Textbook of 

Diseases of Cattle, Horses, Sheep, Pigs, and Goats. Saunders LTD. 2278 pp.

Dolbeer R.A., M.J. Begier, P.R. Miller, J.R. Weller, and A.L Anderson. 2019. Wildlife Strikes to Civil Aircraft in the United 

States, 1990–2018. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration National Wildlife 

Strike Database Serial Report Number 25. 

Green, J.S., F.R. Henderson, and M.D. Collinge. September 1994. The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife 

Damage. Coyotes. University of Nebraska–Lincoln. 76 pp.

Halfpenny, J.C. and E.A. Biesiot. 1986. Second Edition. A Field Guide to Mammal Tracking in North America. Johnson 

Publishing Company, Boulder, CO. pp 35-40.

Kinka, D. and J.K. Young. 2019. Evaluating domestic sheep survival with different breeds of livestock guardian dogs. 

Rangeland Ecology & Management 72(6):923-932. doi: 10.1016/j.rama.2019.07.002 

Mason, J.R., J.A. Shivik, and M.W. Fall. 2001. Chemical repellents and other aversive strategies in predation management.

Endangered Species UPDATE 18:175–181. 

North American Trapper Education Program. 2019. Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Washington DC. https://

conservationlearning.org

U.S. Department of Agriculture
Page 30

North Dakota Cooperative Fur Harvester Education Brochure. 2013. Cable Devices: Identification, Use, and Removing a 

Dog. North Dakota Cooperative Fur Harvester Education Program. United Printing, Bismarck, North Dakota. 2 pp.

North Dakota Cooperative Fur Harvester Education Brochure. 2013. Foothold Traps: Identification, Use, and Removing a 

Dog. North Dakota Cooperative Fur Harvester Education Program. United Printing, Bismarck, North Dakota. 2 pp.

North Dakota Cooperative Fur Harvester Education Manual. 2017. Third Edition. North Dakota Cooperative Fur Harvester 

Education Program. United Printing, Bismarck, North Dakota. 208 pp.

Seabloom, R.W., J.W. Hoganson, and W.F. Jensen. 2011. Mammals of North Dakota. North Dakota Institute for Regional 

Studies. Printed in Canada. pp 117-121.

Shivik, J.A., D.J. Martin, M.J. Pipas, J. Turnam, and T.J. DeLiberto. 2010. Initial comparison: jaws, cables, and cagetraps to capture coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33(4):1375-1383.

Texas Health and Human Services Fact Sheet – Oral Rabies Vaccine Program (ORVP). January 24, 2020. 2 pp. 

Timm, R.M., C.C. Coolahan, R.O. Baker, and S.F. Beckerman. 2007. Coyotes — Pest Notes. University of California 

Publication 74135. 7 pp.

Timm, R.M. and R.O. Baker. 2007. A History of Urban Coyote Problems. Wildlife Damage Management Conferences—

Proceedings 76. 16 pp. 

Tischaefer, R. and J. Olson. May 2015. Using Cable Devices in North Dakota. First Edition. North Dakota Cooperative Fur 

Harvester Education Program. United Printing, Bismarck, North Dakota. 46 pp.

United States Department of Agriculture Death Loss in U.S. Cattle and Calves Due to Predator and Non-Predator Causes, 

2015. December 2017. 85 pp.

United States Department of Agriculture Fact Sheet - The Livestock Protection Collar. May 2010. 3 pp.

United States Department of Agriculture Goat and Kid Predator and Non-Predator Death Loss in the United States, 2015. 

April 2017. 73 pp. 

United States Department of Agriculture – Oral Rabies Vaccinations. September 23, 2019. 2 pp. 

United States Department of Agriculture Sheep and Lamb Predator and Non-Predator Death Loss in the United States, 

2015. September 2015. 64 pp.

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticide Product Label, Large Gas Cartridge. Notice of Pesticide 

Registration. January 31, 2017. 5 pp. 

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticide Product Label, M-44 Cyanide Capsules. Notice of Product 

Registration. January 26, 2018. 7 pp.

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticide Product Label, Sodium Fluoroacetate (Compound 1080) 

Livestock Protection Collar. Notice of Pesticide Reregistration. March 24, 1998. 52 pp. 

WDM Technical Series─Coyotes
Page 31

Young, J.K., S.W. Breck, and E. Hammill. 2019. Interactions with humans shape coyote responses to hazing. Scientific 

Reports 9:20046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56524–6

Young, J.K., J. Draper, and S. Breck. 2019. Mind the gap: Experimental tests to improve efficacy of fladry for nonlethal 

management of coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 43(2):265-271. doi: 10.1002/wsb.970 

Young, J.K., M.J. MacGregor, E.N. Gese, and D.C. Eckery. 2018. Experimental tests of nonsurgical reproductive inhibitors to 

prevent coyote reproduction. Human-Wildlife Interactions 12(2):171-185.

U.S. Department of Agriculture
Page 32

Appendix I—Damage Management Methods for Coyotes

Type of Control Available Management Options 

Animal Husbandry • Birthing schedules

• Carcass removal and disposal

• Herders/shepherds/range riders

• Night penning

• Pasture selection

Denning Removal of adults and young at den sites

Exclusion • Net wire and electric fencing

• Corrals

Fertility Control • No fertility control agents available

• Sterilization of alpha pair

Frightening 

Devices

• Fladry

• Propane cannons

• Radios and other noise makers

• Scarecrows and moveable human effigies

• Strobe lights

Guarding Animals Use of livestock protection dogs, donkeys, and other guarding animals

Habitat 

Modification

• Eliminate or reduce vegetation in areas that may provide cover or resting habitat for 

coyotes

• Contain or bury garbage

• Remove or bury dead livestock

Hazing Shouting, shaking a tin can full of coins or rocks, stomping feet, waving arms, etc. to scare 

away an animal

Repellents No effective chemical repellents available

Shooting May include predator-calling, night operations or aerial operations; May require use of nontoxic/non-lead ammunition; Allowed with proper federal and state permits 

Toxicants • Sodium cyanide/M-44 (EPA Reg. Nos. 56228-15, 35978-1, 35975-2, 39508-1, 33858-2, 

and 13808-8; products are all named M-44 Cyanide Capsules); Restricted Use Pesticide

• Sodium fluoroacetate/livestock protection collar (EPA Reg. Nos. 56228-22, 39508-2, and 

46779-1; products are all named Sodium Fluoroacetate (Compound 1080) Livestock 

Protection Collar); Restricted Use Pesticide

• Large gas cartridges (EPA Reg. Nos. 56228-21 and 56228-62)

Registered pesticides must be used in accordance with label directions. Some pesticides can 

only be applied by persons who have been specially trained and certified for their use. Each of the 

chemical methods listed above have specific requirements for their handling, transport, storage, 

application, and disposal. 

Trapping Foothold and cage traps, cable devices; Allowed with proper federal and state permits
Page 33

Appendix II—Donkeys as Guard Animals

Consider these key points when using a donkey to reduce depredation on sheep or goats: 

• Donkeys should be acquired from a trained, reliable, and professional breeder;

• Choose a medium-sized female (jenny) or a gelded male (jack) compatible with the guarded livestock. 

Non-castrated jacks are too aggressive and may injure livestock;

• Use only one donkey per group of sheep or goats. The exception may be a jenny with a foal. When two or 

more adult donkeys are together or with a horse, they usually stay together, not necessarily near the sheep. 

Also avoid using donkeys in adjacent pastures since they may socialize across the fence and ignore the

sheep;

• Allow 4 to 6 weeks for a naive donkey to bond with the sheep. Stronger bonding may occur when a donkey is 

raised from birth with sheep or goats;

• Avoid feed or supplements for sheep that contain monensin or lasolacid, as both are poisonous to donkeys;

• Remove the donkey during livestock birthing, particularly if birthing involves confinement. This avoids injuries 

to young livestock or disruption of the maternal bond;

• Test a new donkey’s response to canids by challenging it with a dog in a pen or small pasture. Do not use a 

donkey that does not show overt aggression to an intruding dog; and

• Use donkeys in smaller (<600 acres/240 hectares), relatively open pastures with no more than 300 

livestock. Large pastures with rough terrain and vegetation and widely scattered livestock decrease a 

donkey’s effectiveness.
Page 34

Appendix III—Foothold Traps

The following appendix highlights specific techniques related to the use of foothold traps.

Trap Preparation and Maintenance

It is important that foothold traps be clean and in good working condition. Oxidized/rusted foothold traps should be 

cleaned with a wire brush to ensure that all parts function properly. Properly tune the foothold trap with 4 lbs (1.8 kg) 

of pan tension and a level trap pan. Wash all foothold traps (new or used) in hot, soapy water and rinse clean. 

Once dry, begin the process of protecting the steel from oxidation. This is done with commercially manufactured dips 

or dyes that not only darken the color of the steel, but retard oxidation. Plan ahead if using petroleum-based dips as 

these will need adequate warm weather and time to dry properly.

Once treated, foothold traps may be dipped in hot, melted wax. A properly waxed foothold trap will have a wet looking 

appearance. The wax creates a barrier between the treated steel and the dirt used for bedding. If left unwaxed, 

moisture can cause the dirt to adhere to the steel, lowering the performance of the foothold trap. 

A foothold trap should be tuned, washed, and waxed after making a catch. The struggles of the restrained coyote will 

change the original tuning and wear off some, if not all, of the wax needed for a protective barrier. Reusing the same 

foothold trap without proper tuning, cleaning, and waxing will result in lower trap performance and success.

Store prepared foothold traps in covered containers to prevent contamination from unnatural materials or odors.

Set Location

Coyotes travel where walking is easy, such as along infrequently used roads or trails. Do not set foothold traps directly 

in a trail, but to one side where coyotes may stop, such as on a small rise, near a gate, or where the vegetation 

changes. Place the set upwind from the path (or site of coyote activity) so the prevailing wind will carry the scent 

across the area of expected coyote activity. Choose a level spot as close as possible to, but not directly on, the 

coyote’s likely path. The coyote’s approach should never be over dry leaves, tall grass, stones, sticks, weeds, or 

rough ground. Place each set where the coyote will have a clear view as it approaches.

Good locations for a set are often indicated by coyote tracks or scat. The following are good locations in most rural 

areas: 

• side hills and saddles;

• near isolated land features like bale stacks, rock piles, or cut banks;

• trail junctions, fences, and stream crossings;

• pasture roads, livestock trails, waterways, game trails, and dry or shallow creek beds;

• near stock ponds and beaver dams, field borders or corners, tree groves, and eroded gullies;

• sites near animal carcasses, bone or brush piles; and

• below rim rock ledges or similar protected areas.
Page 35

A Properly Bedded Trap

Foothold traps set for coyotes must be properly bedded and hidden (See next page for step-by-step instructions). 

Foothold traps should be level with or slightly below the level of the soil around it. Use a dedicated pair of gloves for 

this process and keep them protected from contamination.

Foothold traps also must be concealed to prevent detection. The most common method is to cover them with dry 

soil or waxed dirt. The open space underneath the trap pan must remain free of solids. This is achieved with an 

under pan material like fiberglass insulation or odorless foam material. These materials fill the void while still 

allowing the foothold trap pan to be depressed. An over-pan cover can be made with wax paper or window screen. 

Use a dirt sifter to remove small sticks and stones from the dirt used to cover the foothold trap. 

Dirt used for covering can be mixed with shaved wax to create a freeze-proof and waterproof foothold trap bedding. 

This type of wax can be acquired from reputable trapping supply dealers. Mix dry-sifted dirt with wax pellets or 

shavings on sunny hot days. The wax will melt into the warm dirt and bond to the soil particles. Large quantities of 

waxed dirt are made using an electric or propane heat source. Wax dirt is stored in covered containers to prevent 

contamination until used. 

Other inclement weather options for foothold trap bedding and covering include sphagnum peat moss, dry 

manure, buckwheat hulls, or finely chopped hay. A disadvantage to these materials is they are attractive to small 

rodents. The rodents digging at these materials may cause the foothold trap to become exposed. 

A mixture of one-part table salt or calcium chloride with three parts dry soil prevents the soil from freezing over the 

foothold trap. When using peat moss or other dry, fluffy material, cover the material with a thin layer of dry soil mixed 

with a teaspoon of table salt. This will blend the set with the surrounding soil and prevent the wind from blowing the 

light material away.
Step 1 

Dig a hole slightly larger than the outside profile of the trap. 

The depth will depend on the amount of chain to be 

concealed under the trap (i.e., the longer the chain, the 

deeper the hole). When the set is finished, the top of the 

trap should be covered by 1⁄8 to 1⁄2 inch of waxed dirt and the

pan should sit slightly lower than the ground around it.

Step 2

Test the hole to make sure the trap will fit and make 

adjustments if needed. Position and drive the stake at the

front of the hole (the side nearest you) where the loose jaw of 

the trap can rest on it.

Step 3

Pack the base of the hole with waxed dirt. Place the trap 

chain in the trap bed, cover it with waxed dirt and pack it 

with a hand or fist. If using an under-pan filler, apply it to the 

foothold trap at this time.

 

Step 4

Place the trap in the trap bed with the loose jaw resting level 

on the top of the stake. Twist the trap slightly from side to 

side to settle it in the waxed dirt. Pack dirt tightly around the 

outside of the trap except for over the spring levers. 

Step 5

Use a finger to apply pressure to each jaw and spring lever

(one at a time). If movement is detected, add some waxed 

dirt or a small dirt clod underneath to prevent movement. 

Page 36

Appendix III—Foothold Traps continued

Instructions for bedding a foothold trap with waxed dirt during freezing conditions. For a standard set in nonfreezing conditions, ignore waxed dirt references. Graphics by Joe Goodman in concert with the Association of 

Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 
Step 6

If using a trap pan cover, apply it to the foothold trap at this 

time. Sift waxed dirt over the trap until it is nearly level with 

the surrounding area.

Step 7

Locate the pan by brushing away some of the waxed dirt. 

When found, pack waxed dirt around the outside of the pan 

using the back of a hand. 

Step 8

If needed, brush or sift a fine layer of dirt over the set to 

blend it in with the surroundings.

A side view of a properly bedded foothold trap.

Page 37
Page 38

Guiding a Coyote 

Coyotes tend to avoid obstacles and place their feet in bare areas. Use a few strategically placed dirt clods, 

sticks, or small rocks at the set to guide the coyote’s foot onto the foothold trap pan. Do not use this method to 

the extent that the set looks unnatural. Coyote scat may be strategically placed at a set as an attractant and foot 

guide.

Bait, Lure, and Urine

Bait, lure, and urine can be used alone or in combination to attract coyotes to the set and make them stay 

longer. The more time a coyote spends at the set, the more likely it will be caught. The choice of bait and its 

placement is based on the coyote’s food source and eating habits. Bait can be chunks of meat or fish and

may be fresh, tainted, or in liquid form. Bait must be used carefully to prevent catching non-target wildlife or

domestic animals.

Lures are classified as gland, food, or curiosity attractants. Gland lure appeals to a coyote’s sexual 

attraction or territorial instincts. Food lure appeals to their desire to eat. Curiosity lure appeals to a coyote’s

instinct to investigate something unfamiliar. Generally, food lure is the most effective in the early fall; gland

lure becomes more effective in mid-winter and during breeding season; and curiosity lure works well 

throughout the year.

Like all canines, coyotes mark their presence by urinating on various objects. Coyote urine is often used to 

attract coyotes and works year-round. The sight and smell of urine triggers a curiosity response that may 

cause a coyote to investigate the set.

Handle bait, lure, and urine containers with a dedicated pair of gloves. Lure containers and gloves used to 

apply them should be kept separate from other trapping equipment to avoid cross contamination.

Types of Foothold Sets

Most sets made with foothold traps are described as either a urine post, flat, or dirt hole set. Other versions 

may be a combination of these three basic sets. Regardless of which set type is used, all begin with a 

properly bedded foothold trap.

• Urine Post Set: When coyotes urinate, they lower the hind quarters, similar to squatting, or use a slightly 

raised leg posture. Urine is usually deposited on some sort of isolated structure, such as woody debris, 

a small pile of grain or hay chaff, a dirt mound, or a carcass bone. The urine post set imitates a location 

where a coyote has urinated. Begin with a properly bedded foothold trap. Utilize an existing structure (or 

add a structure) to serve as the urine post by applying a small amount of coyote urine. Place the urine 

post to help guide the coyote’s foot placement. 

• Flat Set: The flat set takes advantage of a coyote’s curiosity and urge to investigate smells. Most items 

used in this type of set include coyote scat, a dried cow manure patty, a small to medium-sized rock, a 

bleached carcass bone or skull, or a small raised clod of dirt and vegetation. The flat set (Figure 22) 

Appendix III—Foothold Traps continued
Page 39

imitates a location where a coyote may linger in casual investigation. Begin with a properly bedded foothold 

trap. Move or add natural materials and apply small amounts of bait, lure, or urine to them. Add guides to 

help with foot placement. 

• Dirt Hole Set: The dirt hole set (Figure 23) takes advantage of a coyote’s need to investigate smells 

emanating from a hole in the ground. The dirt hole set imitates an existing small rodent burrow. Begin with 

a properly bedded foothold trap. Dig a hole resembling a burrow at a 45-degree angle down and 8 to 10 

inches (20 to 25 cm) deep (if soil conditions allow). The diameter of the hole can be as small as 1⁄2 inch to 

as large as 4 inches (1.2 to 10 cm). Bait is placed in the bottom of the hole and a small wad of vegetation 

is added over the bait. Attractants are added outside of the hole to both appeal to the coyote’s senses and 

guide its foot placement. The location of the foothold trap pan is placed in anticipation of where the visiting 

coyote will step. Note: An existing small rodent burrow or hole may also be used. 

Resetting Traps within a Catch Circle

The disturbed area where a trapped coyote is restrained is referred to as the “catch circle.” The odors and 

disturbance in a catch circle will often attract other coyotes. Thus, the foothold trap can be replaced, and a new set 

made within the catch circle. In some cases, cautious coyotes will approach, but not enter, the catch circle. If sign 

indicates that this occurred, make additional sets outside or adjacent to the catch circle. 

Human Scent and Coyote Trapping 

Coyotes quickly notice human scent. Practice bedding foothold traps frequently to reduce the amount of time spent 

making a set in the field. The longer it takes to make a set, the more human scent is left behind. Coyotes have been 

known to leave an area after encountering an unfamiliar human scent. 

Wet or humid weather causes human scent to remain longer and may make coyotes more difficult to catch with 

foothold traps. Wear gloves, wax foothold traps, and take other precautionary measures when setting traps in areas 

where people or human activity are limited.

Figure 22. A side view of a flat set with a foothold trap. Figure 23. A side view of a dirt hole set with a foothold trap.
Page 40

The following appendix highlights specific techniques related to the use of cable devices.

Cable devices should be cleaned and dulled prior to use (Figure 24). The majority of components are made of 

metal and the manufacturing process leaves oils and odors on the metal. Some components are galvanized, 

and others are bare metal. In either case, metal can shine and must be dulled to avoid detection.

To dull the metal, begin by coiling the cable devices individually and placing them in a kettle. Fill the kettle with 

water until the devices are covered. Estimate the amount of water and mix at a ratio of 1 cup baking soda per 1 

gallon of water. Mix the baking soda in the water until it is completely dissolved and heat. Once boiling, reduce

the temperature to a low roiling boil for 45 minutes to an hour. Pour off the dirty water and rinse the cable 

devices. 

The baking soda boil turns the shiny metal a dull gray color. There is no need to color or dye the devices any 

further. Besides yellow and violet, a coyote sees the world only in shades of gray. If coloring is desired, match 

the color seen from the level of a coyote (24 inches [60 cm] from the ground), not from the height of a standing 

person.

Do not use lye, bleach, muriatic acid or other caustic cleaners with cable devices. The cable and aluminum 

components will quickly deteriorate with exposure to these chemicals. 

Wear gloves when handling and cleaning cable devices. Store cable devices in covered buckets or plastic bags

to avoid contamination. Cable devices do not have to be boiled or treated every season as long as they do not 

become contaminated. Inspect each cable device prior to use. The treating process removes any protection the 

steel and aluminum parts may have had, resulting in rust or deterioration from environmental conditions over 

time.

Appendix IV–Cable Devices 

Figure 24. Cable devices can be cleaned and treated with 

minimal equipment.
Page 41

Setting Cable Devices

Cable devices are built and include components for specific purposes (live-capture/restraint or lethal) in 

specific habitats. Match the device to how it is being used. Different designs include the following:

• Using shorter cables for cattails or tall grass areas, and adding a tangle rod if lethal results are desired;

• Using a lighter breakaway device in areas frequented by non-target animals, such as deer;

• Using medium to long cables in areas with good natural entanglement for lethal results; and

• Checking a device daily when used near people or domestic dogs.

To ensure cable device sets are selective for coyotes, consider the following items.

• Location: Scout, follow tracks, identify the variety of animals in the area, and learn where coyote trails exist.

Avoid setting cable devices in areas with non-target animal traffic. 

Loop size and shape: Know the right size loop for coyotes and become proficient at suspending a loop that 

size. In some cases, it may be more appropriate to use a smaller diameter loop in narrower trail sets that go 

through heavy cover. The following loop sizes represent a top to bottom measurement, not side to side.

•

 

•

 

Note: Galvanized Aircraft Cable (GAC) is used to make cable devices. Most often, this cable will not

provide a perfect circular loop. The loop more resembles a teardrop than a circle. A loop resembling a 

perfect circle is not required to catch coyotes, nor is a perfect circle naturally observed in the field. The

measurement from a coyote’s chin to the tip of its ears is greater than the measurement from one side 

of its head to the other. Teardrop-shaped loops are more appropriate than a perfect circle. It is critical 

to ensure the loop is the correct size and height from the ground and centered in the trail.

• Loop height: The loop height is the distance from the bottom of the suspended loop to the ground. As a 

coyote passes its head through the loop, the portion of its throat just under the chin should make initial 

contact with the bottom of the suspended loop. The coyote’s forward progression will cause the loop to 

encircle its neck. When the loop is suspended properly, other smaller non-target animals can easily pass 

under the loop (Figure 25).

A Breakaway Component 

A breakaway component is designed to fail under an established amount of pressure, causing the complete 

disassembly of the cable device loop. A breakaway component allows for the release of larger, non-target 

animals accidentally restrained with a cable device. 

A breakaway component may be a j-hook, s-hook, or an aluminum release ferrule. Pull testing is done and 

weight ratings are established for each type of breakaway. Breakaway component ratings used for coyote cable 

devices range from 110 to 350 lbs (86 to 158 kg). These weight ratings correlate to the amount of pressure 
Page 42

required to cause the component to fail. In order to work, a cable device with a breakaway component must 

be solidly anchored to an immovable object.

• RAM® Power Snare: The RAM power snare is a torsion spring-powered lethal cable device (Figure 26). A 

short cable is used to attach the loop to the torsion spring. The torsion spring is set and anchored 

parallel to the coyote trail. As the coyote passes its head through the loop, its forward motion closes the 

loop around its neck. The continued forward motion allows the torsion spring arm to release and 

expand, keeping pressure on the loop around the coyote’s neck and resulting in the animal’s death. 

• Belisle® Foot Snare: A Belisle foot snare is a torsion spring-powered restraining cable device that works 

similar to a foothold trap (Figure 27). When the coyote steps on the pan, the torsion spring arm throws 

the cable loop up onto the leg. The coyote is restrained by the cable loop around the foot.

• Collarum®: A Collarum is a coil and torsion spring-powered restraining cable device that works similar to 

the Belisle foot snare (Figure 28). With a Collarum, the coyote pulls on a baited trigger and the spring 

arm throws the cable loop around the head and onto the neck. 

Appendix IV–Cable Devices continued

Figure 25. Center the bottom of the cable loop in the center of the trail. This 

set location is for a lethal cable device because the woody rooted vegetation 

provides entanglement. 

Figure 26. An example of a RAM® Power Snare set.

Figure 27. The Belisle® foot snare is a torsion spring-powered 

foothold restraining cable device.

Figure 28. The Collarum® is a coil and torsion spring-powered 

restraining cable device.