alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit13**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Alfa Laval Special Finance AB (the “Company”) on Form 20-F forthe period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertify that to the best of our knowledge:

 

1.           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: April 23,  2004 |   |   | /s/ Sigge Haraldsson    |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                       |   | Name:  | Sigge Haraldsson        |   |
|                       |   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                       |   |   |                    |   |
|                       |   |   |                    |   |
| Date: April 23,  2004 |   |   | /s/ Thomas Thuresson    |   |
|                       |   | Name:  | Thomas Thuresson        |   |
|                       |   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40372 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WALTER EARL STEPHENSON, JR, also known as Stevie Stephenson, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CR-42-1

- - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Walter Earl Stephenson, Jr., appeals the district court’s denial of his request to withdraw his guilty plea and asks in the alternative that the Government be required to perform specifically under the plea. He argues that he relied on the Government’s promise in the plea agreement to consider substantial assistance provided by him in other investigations, but that the Government did not give him the opportunity to provide that assistance and never intended to recommend a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, p.s.No. 98-40372 -2- The language of the plea agreement states that the Government retains its discretion to recommend a departure. Stephenson therefore can prevail only if he showed by a preponderance of the evidence that he relied on a promise that the Government never intended to keep. Evidence at the hearing showed that the government agent who had debriefed Stephenson felt that he was being uncooperative and deliberately vague. Although the agents had used other information gathered during this investigation to commence other proceedings, the information from Stephenson was not a help and the agent felt it would be a waste of time to question him again. Stephenson has not shown that the district court erred in finding that the Government did not breach the agreement. See United States v. Garcia-Bonilla , 11 F.3d 45, 46 (5th Cir. 1993). The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.3



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Paperweight Development Corp.
(the Company), hereby certifies that:



| | (1) |  | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP.
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                     
|Dated: March 18, 2003 |  |  |  |                              
|                     
|                      |  |  |  |                              
|                      |  |  |  |                              
|                      |  |  |  |
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cooper Industries, Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry A. Klebe,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Terry A. Klebe
------------------
Terry A. Klebe
Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer

March 8, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wells Real Estate Fund VII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|August 12, 2005           
|                          
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|August 12, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 3/31/97
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,469
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,327
<PP&E>                                          80,954
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,186,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,144
<BONDS>                                        535,575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           422
<OTHER-SE>                                     543,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,186,655
<SALES>                                         81,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,897
<CGS>                                           11,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,309)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,011)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,011)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.15**

 

THIRDAMENDMENT TO THE

1997EQUITY PARTICIPATION PLAN OF

DUANEREADE INC.

 

 

Duane Reade Inc. (the “Company”), acorporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, by resolution ofits Board of Directors (the “Board”), adopted the 1997 Equity ParticipationPlan of Duane Reade Inc. (the “Plan”), effective as of June 18, 1997. Section10.2 of the Plan allows the Board to amend the Plan in certain respects at anytime or from time to time.

 

In order to amend the Plan in certain respects,this Third Amendment to the Plan has been adopted by a resolution of the Boardon February 11, 2003, effective as set forth herein.  This amendment to the Plan, together with the Plan and the Firstand Second Amendments, constitutes the entire Plan as amended to date.

 

1.                                       AMENDMENT TOSECTION 2.1(a).  Section 2.1(a) of thePlan is amended, effective as of the date of approval of a majority of theCompany’s stockholders, to read in its entirety as follows:

 

 “(a)        The shares ofstock subject to Options, awards of Restricted Stock, Performance Awards,Dividend Equivalents, awards of Deferred Stock, Stock Payments or StockAppreciation Rights shall be the Company’s Common Stock, par value $.01 pershare.  The aggregate number of suchshares which may be issued upon exercise of such options, rights or awardsunder the Plan shall not exceed 3,971,181. The shares of Common Stock issuableupon exercise of such Options, rights or awards may be either previouslyauthorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.”

 

 

Dated: February 11, 2003

 
| DUANE READE INC. |
|------------------|
|             |   |
|             |   |
| By               |  /s/  Michelle  D. Bergman |
|             | Michelle D. Bergman  Vice President, General Counsel  and Secretary |

 

 

----
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Theodore Roosevelt
National Park
North Dakota


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Longhorn Cattle
 Learn about their history and management.

Announcements
November 16, 2023
Update, November 16, 2023 - new FAQ 30 uploaded
November 2, 2023
The recording of the Theodore Roosevelt National Park Livestock Plan Environmental Assessment (EA), closed captioning and transcript have been posted here: Livestock Plan Environmental Assessment Meeting. The transcript of the public meeting can also be found on the project planning website: https://parkplanning.nps.gov/LP
October 5, 2023
Update, October 5, 2023 - new FAQ 25 uploaded
September 25, 2023
The Livestock Plan Environmental Assessment (EA) is now open for public comment from September 25 through November 24, 2023. The EA and information concerning a virtual public meeting can be found at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/LP
More Information
Visit the park’s planning website for more information.

**Please submit questions via this link. We will provide answers through the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section below.**Questions submitted through this portal will continue to be answered through updated FAQs, but they will not contribute to the administrative record for management planning.

FAQManagement DocumentsMammals Home Page
 Last updated: December 15, 2023
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: PO Box 7
Medora,
ND
58645
 Phone: 701 623-4466 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
461 P.2d 918

#### Ricardo M. MONTOYA, State Labor Commissioner of the State of New Mexico, Petitioner, v. Honorable Samuel MONTOYA, District Judge of the First Judicial District of the State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 8960.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Nov. 21, 1969.

MOISE, Chief Justice, and COMPTON, TACKETT and WATSON, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDSIM: A distributed simulatorDiscrete event-driven simulation makes it possible to model a computer system in detail. However, such simulation models can require a significant time to execute. This is especially true when modeling large parallel or distributed systems containing many processors and a complex communication network. One solution is to distribute the simulation over several processors. If enough parallelism is achieved, large simulation models can be efficiently executed. This study proposes a distributed simulator called DSIM which can run on various architectures. A simulated test environment is used to verify and characterize the performance of DSIM. The results of the experiments indicate that speedup is application-dependent and, in DSIM's case, is also dependent on how the simulation model is distributed among the processors. Furthermore, the experiments reveal that the communication overhead of ethernet-based distributed systems makes it difficult to achieve reasonable speedup unless the simulation model is computation bound.Document ID19900019037Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsGoswami, Kumar K.*(Illinois Univ. Urbana-Champaign, IL, United States)*Iyer, Ravishankar K.*(Illinois Univ. Urbana-Champaign, IL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186880NASA-CR-186880Accession Number90N28353Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCA2-385Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900019037.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Mark R.Goldston, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of United Online, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

(a)   the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.
| Dated: March 1, 2007              |     |
|----------------------------------------|----------|
| /s/ MARK R. GOLDSTON                   |     |
| Mark R. Goldston                       |     |
| *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer* | * * |

 

----
#### LE JOHN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. PHILLIPS TELEVISION AND APPLIANCES, Inc., Appellee.

No. 12397.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 30, 1955.

Decided April 14, 1955.

Mr. Thomas B. Scott, Washington, D. C. , with whom Mr. Lawrence J. Simmons, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Leon M. Shinberg, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, BAZELON and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

By petition in the proceedings of the appellee bankrupt, appellant sought reclamation of certain merchandise on the ground that it delivered the merchandise in consignment transactions and thereby retained title. The referee in bankruptcy denied the petition upon a finding that “the transactions were no more than absolute sales with the privilege * * * to return any unsold merchandise.” The District Court dismissed the petition for review of the referee’s order and this appeal followed.

Appellant urges reversal on the ground that the above-mentioned finding is clearly erroneous. Some of the written evidence — -purchase orders and invoices— tended to show that the transactions were sales. Other written and some oral evidence tended to show the transactions were consignments. Since the finding under attack does not “rest exclusively on the written evidence or the undisput*627ed facts,”1 our review is weighted by the trial court’s assessment of credibility.” *2**So*viewed, we cannot say that the finding is clearly erroneous.3

Affirmed.

1

. Orvis v. Higgins, 2 Cir., 1950, 180 F.2d 537, 539.

2

. Bishop v. United States, 96 U.S.App. D.C.—, 223 F.2d 582, dissenting opinion, page 589, citing Dollar v. Land, 1950, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 214, 218, 184 F.2d 245, 249; and Orvis v. Higgins, supra.

3

. See United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 1948, 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68
§ 9185.4-2 Showing required. ( a ) *Necessity.* The applicants for the resurvey of any township are required to present satisfactory prima facie evidence of the necessity for such action. In general, it must be shown that the evidences of the original survey are so widely obliterated or that the prevailing survey conditions are so grossly defective as to preclude the satisfactory identification of the subdivisions of the subsisting survey or that the evidences of the original survey are in such an advanced state of deterioration that action looking to their preservation and perpetuation is expedient as in the public interest.
( b ) *Ownership of land.* The applicants for resurvey are required to preface their petition by the statement that the extent of privately owned lands within the township is in excess of 50 percent of the total area thereof. If necessary, information in this connection may be obtained by the petitioners from the manager of the land office having local jurisdiction. Failure to comply with the condition set forth in this section or material error in the showing made, will not only result in delaying action upon the petition, but may require its rejection if it is found that the township is not properly subject to resurvey under the terms of the governing Act.
Exhibit 10.2


 





 






     


     


    

 





 






    2


     


    

 





 






    3


     


    

 





 





    4
Editorial Note on Part 121
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 121.1006 When will a size protest be referred to an SBA Government Contracting Area Office? ( a ) A contracting officer who receives a protest (other than from SBA) must forward the protest promptly to the SBA Government Contracting Area Office serving the area in which the headquarters of the offeror is located.
( b ) A contracting officer's referral must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The protest and any accompanying materials;
( 2 ) A copy of the self-certification as to size;
( 3 ) Identification of the applicable size standard;
( 4 ) A copy of the solicitation;
( 5 ) Identification of the date of bid opening or notification provided to unsuccessful offerors;
( 6 ) The date on which the protest was received; and
( 7 ) A complete address and point of contact for the protested concern.
Exhibit 4.446

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182548 dated July 15, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Telematic services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 15, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 23, 2020 No. 172-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
    	
 
    
	
COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
    	
 
    
	
IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS,
    	
 
    
	
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119601