alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5089 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5089

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reinstate criminal penalties 
for persons charging veterans unauthorized fees relating to claims for 
   benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
                    Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2022

 Mr. Boozman (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Graham, Ms. Murkowski, 
Mr. King, Ms. Rosen, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Brown, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. 
 Feinstein, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Tester, Mr. Bennet, and Mr. 
Braun) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to reinstate criminal penalties 
for persons charging veterans unauthorized fees relating to claims for 
   benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
                    Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Governing Unaccredited 
Representatives Defrauding VA Benefits Act'' or the ``GUARD VA Benefits 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF PENALTIES FOR CHARGING VETERANS UNAUTHORIZED 
              FEES RELATING TO CLAIMS FOR BENEFITS UNDER LAWS 
              ADMINISTERED BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 5905 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``Penalty'' and 
        inserting ``Penalties'' (and conforming the table of sections 
        at the beginning of chapter 59 of such title accordingly);
            (2) by inserting ``(a) Withholding of Benefits.--'' before 
        ``Whoever''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Charging of Unauthorized Fees.--Except as provided in 
sections 5904 or 1984 of this title, whoever directly or indirectly 
solicits, contracts for, charges, or receives, or attempts to solicit, 
contract for, charge, or receive, any fee or compensation with respect 
to the preparation, presentation, or prosecution of any claim for 
benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary shall be fined as 
provided in title 18, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.''.
                                 <all>
```
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 436

**Question 436:** Licensees are required to "reduce the dose that an individual may be allowed to receive in the current year by the amount of occupational dose received while employed by any other person." How should this provision be applied to dose categories required to be monitored by the current licensee, for which the individual's dose report (e.g., NRC Form 5) from previous employment during the current year at another licensee's facility indicates "NR" (not required), "ND" (not detectable), or is left blank? May the dose in categories denoted on the dose record as "NR", "ND", or left blank be assumed to be zero, and therefore no reduction be made to the dose that the individual may be allowed to receive in the current year?

**Answer:** Yes, for cases in which "NR" or "ND" have been recorded. However, if there is no recorded dose for a dose category and no reason for this omission has been provided (i.e., "NR" or "ND" have not been entered), the licensee should determine if the dose value has been omitted erroneously before assuming it to be zero (e.g., by checking with the licensee that provided the Form 5 with a dose category left blank). If the licensee cannot determine why there is no recorded dose for a dose category, the licensee has been unable to obtain a complete record of the individual's dose history for that dose category and the individual's exposure must be limited in accordance with 10 CFR 20.2104 (e) (1).

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1201, 10 CFR 20.2104, Regulatory Guide 8.7, Rev. 1)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
#### Joseph L. Kirkwood, Respondent, v. Anaconda Copper Mining Company, Appellant.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present- — -Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH

NELSON FERNANDEZ

Plaintiff,

v.

THE WALKING COMPANY, a foreign forprofit corporation

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 9:20-cv-80469

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to answer, move, 

or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The Court, having reviewed the file and being fully 

advised in the premises, finds that there is good cause to grant the relief requested in the Motion. 

It is therefore,

ORDERED that the Motion is granted. The Defendant shall answer, move, or otherwise 

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint by May 22, 2020.

DONE AND ORDERED this ___ day of April, 2020, in Chambers of the United States 

District Court for the Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division. 

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-80469-KAM Document 5-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/21/2020 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of New Energy Systems Group, (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jufeng Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 22, 2011





/s/ Jufeng ChenJufeng Chen

Chief Financial Officer
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Weir Farm
National Historical ParkConnecticut
EXHIBIT 32.2

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skynet Telematics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB, for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark Dingley, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Mark Dingley
-----------------------
    Mark Dingley
    Chief Financial Officer

April 30, 2007


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          57,985                  57,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,343                  61,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,085                 122,085
<PP&E>                                          14,577                  14,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,705                 151,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          621,565                 621,565
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        25,000                  25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (782,505)               (782,505)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,705                 151,705
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,620                  24,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,581                  12,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (82,201)                (36,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (82,201)                (36,755)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (82,201)                (36,755)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.003)                 (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)                 (0.001)
        

</TABLE>
HomeAbout NRCPlans, Budgets, & PerformanceEvidence Building and EvaluationAgencywide Evidence Building ActivitiesResearch

# Research Details

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, May 03, 2022
#### § 101.109 Do SBA regulations include the section headings?

Yes. All SBA regulations must be interpreted as including the section headings.
§ 8.2 Additional lands for correlative purposes. The fee title will be acquired for the following: ( a ) Such lands as are needed to meet present and future requirements for fish and wildlife as determined pursuant to the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act.
( b ) Such lands as are needed to meet present and future public requirements for outdoor recreation, as may be authorized by Congress.
EXHIBIT 31


                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


      I, Lee Kasper, President and Chief Financial Officer of NuTech Digital,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of NuTech Digital, Inc.

      Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report.

      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in the report.

      I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company
and have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

      I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and to the audit committee
of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

      (i) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
      affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and

      (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
      over financial reporting.


Dated:  March 23, 2004

                                    /s/Lee Kasper
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Lee Kasper
                                    President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

CASE NO. 1:20-cv-22234-MARTINEZ-BECERRA

LINCO ENTERPRISES, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

OLEG FIRER, EZ CAPITAL FUND, LLC, 

STAR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC,

UNIFIED ADVANCE, LLC, STAR EQUITIES, LLC,

and IGOR “GARY” GELMAN

Defendants.

____________________________________/

NOTICE OF HEARING

Defendants EZ CAPITAL FUND, LLC (“EZ Capital”), STAR CAPITAL 

MANAGEMENT, LLC (“Star Capital”), UNIFIED ADVANCE, LLC (“Unified Advance”), 

STAR EQUITIES, LLC (“Star Equities”), Oleg Firer (“Firer”), and Igor “Gary” Gelman 

(“Gelman”) have set for hearing the following matter for a discovery hearing before the Honorable 

Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra:

DATE: November 20, 2020

TIME: 1:00 P.M.

MATTER TO BE HEARD: The parties dispute the appropriate scope of three subpoenas 

seeking bank records attached to Notice of Intent to Serve Subpoenas served by Plaintiff.

LOCAL RULE 7.1(A)(3) CERTIFICATE

Case 1:20-cv-22234-JEM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/18/2020 Page 1 of 2
Counsel for Defendants has conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, by telephone on November 18, 

2020, in a good faith effort to resolve the issued raised by this Notice of Hearing and has been 

unable to do so.

Dated: November 18, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

By: s/Steven D. Weber

Steven D. Weber

Fla. Bar. No.: 47543

STARK WEBER PLLC

1221 Brickell Avenue

Suite 900

Miami, FL 33131

Tel: (305) 377-8788

steve@starkweber.com

Attorneys for Defendants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, on this 18th day of November, 2020, a copy of the foregoing 

has been served via the Court’s CM/ECF portal to:

Sergiu Gherman 

Fla. Bar No. 37031

sgherman@ghermanlaw.com

Gherman Legal Pllc

25 SE 2nd Ave. Ste. 808

Miami FL 33131-1603

Attorney for Plaintiff

Linco Enterprises Inc.

By: s/Steven D. Weber

Case 1:20-cv-22234-JEM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/18/2020 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-61177-RAR

ISLANDE AUBOURG,

Plaintiff,

v.

HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________/ 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal 

with Prejudice [ECF No. 18]. The Court having reviewed the Joint Stipulation, the record, and 

being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each 

party to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit. The Clerk is instructed to mark this case 

CLOSED, and any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Should the parties wish that the 

Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement as requested, they must file the agreement with 

the Court.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 12th day of April, 2021.

 

_________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61177-RAR Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2021 Page 1 of 1
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5095 

To establish a pilot program to address hunger among older individuals 

and adults with disabilities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2022 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To establish a pilot program to address hunger among older 

individuals and adults with disabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tools for Ensuring 

5 Access to Meals Act’’ or the ‘‘TEAM Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERAGENCY COLLABORATIVE AND INNOVATION 

7 PILOT PROGRAM. 

8 Section 201 of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 

9 U.S.C. 3011) is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5095 IS

1 ‘‘(h)(1) In this subsection: 

2 ‘‘(A) The term ‘Center’ means the Research, 

3 Demonstration, and Evaluation Center for the Aging 

4 Network described in subsection (g). 

5 ‘‘(B) The term ‘Director’ means the Director of 

6 the Center. 

7 ‘‘(2) The Director shall establish, in fiscal year 2026, 

8 an Interagency Collaborative and Innovation Pilot Pro9 gram to Address Hunger and Promote Access to Healthy 

10 Food Among Older Adults and Adults with Disabilities 

11 (referred to in this subsection as the ‘pilot program’). 

12 ‘‘(3) The Director shall carry out the pilot program 

13 through the Center. 

14 ‘‘(4) The Director shall carry out the pilot program 

15 to address hunger among, including promoting access to 

16 healthy food for, older individuals and adults with disabil17 ities by— 

18 ‘‘(A) implementing best practices for addressing 

19 food insecurity, including by promoting access to 

20 healthy, affordable, and local or regional food among 

21 older individuals and adults with disabilities; 

22 ‘‘(B) seeking recommendations from Federal 

23 agencies about how to support interagency collabora24 tion to address food insecurity; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5095 IS

1 ‘‘(C) implementing innovative practices to ad2 dress food insecurity; and 

3 ‘‘(D) evaluating the impact of subparagraphs 

4 (A) through (C) on addressing food insecurity. 

5 ‘‘(5) In carrying out the pilot program, the Director 

6 shall provide funding for demonstration projects, evalua7 tion, and research related to the activities referred to in 

8 paragraph (4). 

9 ‘‘(6) In addition to any other funds appropriated for 

10 the Center, there is authorized to be appropriated for the 

11 Center, to carry out this subsection, $5,000,000 for fiscal 

12 year 2026 and each subsequent fiscal year.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 6304.25 What special provisions apply to livestock grazing? ( a ) If you hold a BLM grazing permit or grazing lease for land within a wilderness area, you may continue to graze your livestock provided that you or your predecessors began such use under a permit or lease before Congress established the wilderness area.
( b ) Your grazing activities within wilderness areas, including the construction, use, and maintenance of livestock management improvements, must comply with the livestock grazing regulations in part 4100 of this chapter.
( c ) If the management plan for the area allows, you may maintain or reconstruct grazing support facilities that existed before designation of the wilderness area. BLM will not authorize new support facilities for the purpose of increasing your number of livestock. The construction of new livestock management facilities must be for the purposes of protection and improved management of wilderness resources.
( d ) BLM may authorize an increase in livestock numbers only if you demonstrate that the additional use will not have an adverse impact on wilderness values.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7482

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. UJIMA CRUDUP, a/k/a Oo, a/k/a Uji , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 4:11

- cr - 00052

- AWA

- LRL

- 2 )

Submitted : May 19, 2021 Decided: May 28, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER , and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ujima Crudup , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ujima Crudup appeals the district court’s order den ying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and
find no abuse of discretion

. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis trict court. United States v. Crudup , No. 4:11

- cr - 00052

- AWA

- LRL

- 2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 2020) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED