alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCCareer OpportunitiesWorking at NRCNRC EthicsSummaries of Major Ethics Rules

# Supplementing Federal Salary

The criminal law (18 USC 209) prohibits employees from receiving any salary or supplementation to their Government salary for carrying out their official services from anyone other than the Government (except a State, county, or municipality).
> 
*Example: An employee who is making a speech while on official duty cannot accept a fee from the organization which sponsored the event.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Financial Interests
          - Impartiality
          - Security Ownership Restrictions
          - Gifts
          - Bribery
          - NRC Time and Property
          - NRC Title or Position
          - Nonpublic Information
          - Outside Employment
          - Supplementing Federal Salary
          - Teaching, Speaking, or Writing
          - Fundraising
          - Representations to the Government
          - Job Seeking
          - Post-Employment Restrictions
          - Expert Witness
          - Political Restrictions
          - Procurement Restrictions
          - Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act
          - Foreign Governments
          - Financial Disclosure (5 CFR Part 2634)

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         175,136
<SECURITIES>                                18,931,349
<RECEIVABLES>                                  442,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,966
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,552,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          440,163
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,111,921
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,552,084
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               701,699
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                640,868
<INCOME-TAX>                                   640,868
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            640,868
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   640,868
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Wetlands
Exhibit 4.479

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 186314 dated April 13, 2021

 

For Rendering

 

Telecommunication services for provision of communication channels

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 13, 2026.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated December 29, 2020 No. 575-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   O.А. Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 123299
HomeAbout NRCNRC COVID-19 Update

COVID-19 Activities: **Operating Reactors** | **Nuclear Materials** | **Security and EP**

**Our Goal**

----

**Current Regulatory Issues**

## Security and Emergency Preparedness

## Power Reactor Training andQualification for PersonnelPerforming Security Duties

## Emergency Preparedness

----

**Stay Connected**

Despite NRC staff working remotely, the NRC continues to hold public meetings via virtual collaboration tools and is committed to openness, transparency, and public engagement as part of our decision making process.

**Upcoming Key Public Meetings**

**Recent Public Meetings**
                - June 23, 2020  – Potential Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Exemptions Due to Impacts from the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency
                - April 30, 2020  - Potential Emergency Preparedness Enforcement Guidance and Exemption Requests Due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency
                - April 9, 2020  – Security Training and Re-qualification and Fitness for Duty / Access Authorization Requirements
                - April 3, 2020  – Security Training and Re-qualification and Fitness for Duty / Access Authorization Requirements

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, October 14, 2020
#### Francis J. Flanagan et al., as Executors of Joseph A. Flanagan, Deceased, Appellants, v. John J. Flanagan, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Mary E. Flanagan, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

The motion is referred to the court that rendered the decision. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. Motion for reargument granted and on reargument the motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is granted. The following question is certified: Was the judgment of the Special Term, insofar as it is contained in the last seven decretal paragraphs thereof relating to the counterclaims of the defendants, properly made? Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*pp. 918, 1008.]
#### § 3420.1-7 Consultation with states and Indian tribes.

Before adopting a comprehensive land use plan or land use analysis that makes an assessment of lands acceptable for further consideration for leasing, the Bureau of Land Management or other surface management agency shall consult with the state Governor and the state agency charged with the responsibility for maintaining the state's unsuitability program (43 CFR 3461.4-1). Where a tribal government administers areas within or near the boundaries of a comprehensive land use plan or land use analysis being prepared by the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau shall consult with the tribal government.

[44 FR 42615, July 19, 1979. Redesignated and amended at 47 FR 33137, July 30, 1982]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                  EXHIBIT 27.01

                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X

         This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from
Balance  Sheet,  Statement  of  Operations,  Statement  of Cash  Flows and Notes
thereto  incorporated in Part 1, Item 1, of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              mar-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                                   jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                                         712
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               51,109
<PP&E>                                                         38,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 (38,152)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 188,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          211,983
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       4,550
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (27,991)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   188,542
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               103
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               27,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (27,586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (27,586)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (27,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (27,586)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
Re: Response to EPA Comments On Fault Tree Analysis Outline for

HCR-188C 

Margaret Sheppard to: richard, Riskscicom 04/11/2008 05:36 PM

Cc: Cindy Newberg, Dave Godwin, Julius Banks, Karen Thundiyil,

Monica Shimamura

Follow Up: Normal Priority. 

Richard and Gary,

Thank you for your thoughful response to EPA's comments on the FTA outline.

After consideration, we still would like you to examine a scenario for a technician who is not properly

trained with HCR-188C or flammable refrigerants. Our EPA enforcement staff have found a number of

situations where untrained or uncertified technicians worked on AC or refrigeration systems. Although we

wish that such a scenario did not occur in reality, it is still of concern to us.

Karen and Monica, please follow up if Dr. Whitmyre or Mr. Maruya need to discuss this further. Thanks.

Margaret Sheppard

USEPA/Stratospheric Protection Division

SNAP Program

Tel. 202-343-9163

Fax 202-343-2362

email: sheppard.margaret@epa.gov
#### § 127.352 What is the process for becoming a third-party certifier?

SBA will periodically hold open solicitations. All entities that believe they meet the criteria to act as a third-party certifier will be free to respond to the solicitation.

[85 FR 27662, May 11, 2020]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus RIOS-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40430.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

*238Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jesus Rios-Rivera pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced to 63 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Rios-Rivera argues that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release and that this condition should therefore be vacated. This claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662).

Rios-Rivera’s constitutional challenge to the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Rios-Rivera contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert, denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Rios-Rivera properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Cornelius Madigan, Deceased, Respondent, against United Hospital et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1077.]
| Exhibit 10.14(a) |
|------------------|

**ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.**

**Non-Employee Director Compensation**

            The following compensation schedule applied to directors who were not employees of the Company in 2009:1

**Annual Retainers**

The highest applicable annual retainer amount of the amounts set forth below:
| Director                           |             | $36,000 per year |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
| Committee Chair (other than Audit) |                                                               | $45,000 per year |
| Audit Committee Chair              |                                                               | $49,500 per year |
| Chairman of the Board              |                                                               | $54,000 per year |

**Meeting Fees**

****
| Each board meeting physically attended (Chair)                                   |               | $2,700            |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|-------------------|
| Each board meeting physically attended (non-Chair)      |     | $1,800            |
| Each committee meeting physically attended                                       |               | $1,800            |
| Each board or committee meeting, telephonic participation                        |               | $   900 |
| Reimbursement of appropriate out-of-pocket expenses                              |               |              |

**Stock Grants***

****
|       | •  | $31,500 fair market value of restricted shares upon initial election to Board             |
|--------------------------------|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | •  | $31,500 Black-Scholes value of stock options upon initial election to Board               |
|                           | •  | $31,500 fair market value of restricted shares following each annual stockholders meeting |
|                           | •  | $31,500 Black-Scholes value of stock options following each annual stockholders meeting   |

The directors voluntarily elected in 2009 to forego annual grants, instead opting for an Annual Incentive Fee in the amount of $63,000 and participation in the ExpressJet Airlines 2009 Treasury Stock Purchase Plan.

**Flight Benefits**

            Benefits described in the Form of Amended and Restated Letter Agreement relating to certain flight benefits between the Company and our non-employee directors for whom we are able to secure suchbenefits (previously filed).

1 The compensation reflected in this summary reflects amounts that were payable following voluntary reductions taken in 2008.
§ 429.4 What types of uses are not subject to the requirements and processes established under this part? ( a ) Individual, non-commercial use of Reclamation land, facilities, or waterbodies for occasional activities such as hiking, camping for periods of 14 days or less during any period of 30 consecutive days, sightseeing, picnicking, hunting, swimming, boating, and fishing, consistent with applicable laws, regulations and policies. Public conduct associated with these activities is governed by part 423 of this chapter;
( b ) Buildings and structures used by concessionaires or managing partners to facilitate their operations or that are made available by them for the general, non-exclusive use of the public. Examples include, but are not limited to the following: ( 1 ) Boat docks available for short-term use by the public;
( 2 ) Marina slips available for rent by the public;
( 3 ) Publicly available boat ramps;
( 4 ) Houseboats available for short-term rent by the public;
( 5 ) Stores and restaurants;
( 6 ) Employee housing; and
( 7 ) Rental cabins, hotels, campgrounds, and other short-term lodging facilities.
( c ) While not subject to other requirements and processes established under this part, the following types of uses must be in compliance with the requirements in subpart H of this part: ( 1 ) Recreational activities at sites managed by non-Federal managing partners under Public Law 89-72, titled Federal Water Project Recreation Act, July 9, 1965;
( 2 ) Activities managed by other Federal agencies or Interior bureaus by agreement or under other authority;
( 3 ) Activities at sites directly managed by Reclamation where fees or fee schedules are established for general public recreation use;
( 4 ) Uses authorized under concession contracts on Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies;
( 5 ) Reclamation contracts for water supply or water operations;
( 6 ) Authorized operation and maintenance activities on Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies undertaken by water user organizations, or their contractors, or by Reclamation contractors;
( 7 ) Agreements and real property interests granted for the replacement or relocation of facilities, such as highways, railroads, telecommunication, or transmission lines or infrastructure governed by Section 14 of the Reclamation Project Act of August 4, 1939 (43 U.S.C. 389). Payments to equalize land values may still be required and administrative costs may still be recovered; and
( 8 ) Activities specifically authorized under other Federal statutes or regulations.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 9:20-cv-80484

LAURA LOOMER,

Plaintiff,

v.

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Defendant.

/

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION

Plaintiff Laura Loomer hereby opposes the applications for pro hac vice admission 

submitted by Defendant Facebook, Inc. on April 10, 2020 for counsel at the law firm Davis 

Wright Tremaine LLP. ECF No. 10-12. The reason for this opposition is that counsel at Davis 

Wright Tremaine LLP have engaged in unethical acts and practices regarding Plaintiff Loomer in 

violation of The Florida Rules of Professional Conduct.

 Nor was prior consent sought by Davis Wright Tremaine LLP for their pro hac vice 

motions before these motions were filed, and counsel for Defendants were put on notice with 

regard to issues involving pro hac vice admission before this honorable Court.

 Plaintiff Loomer respectfully requests oral argument telephonically on this issue before 

any pro hac vice motion is considered by this Honorable Court.

Dated: April 10, 2020 Respectfully Submitted,

s/ Larry Klayman_______

Larry Klayman, Esq.

KLAYMAN LAW GROUP P.A. 

7050 W. Palmetto Park Rd 

Boca Raton FL 33433

Tel: (561) 558-5536

Case 9:20-cv-80484-RS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2020 Page 1 of 3
2

Email: leklayman@gmail.com

Case 9:20-cv-80484-RS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2020 Page 2 of 3
1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed 

electronically and served through the court’s ECF system to all counsel of record or parties on 

April 10, 2020

/s/ Larry Klayman

Larry Klayman, Esq.

Case 9:20-cv-80484-RS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2020 Page 3 of 3
C.J. J.

J. J. J. J. The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5). Accordingly, we approve attorney Robert Dale Gibb's resignation. SCR 98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted.

It is so ORDERED. 

# A z110‘.. J. Hardesty Parraguirre

Saitta cc: David A. Clark, Bar Counsel Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Robert Dale Gibb Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00232

- CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.
Cesar A. Enamorado, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COUR T AT LAW NO. 3 OF TR AVIS COUNTY NO. C

- 1

- CR

- 17

- 219112 , THE HONORABLE JOHN LIPSCOMBE, JUDGE PR ESID ING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The State of Texas, which filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order
granting a pretrial motion to suppress evidence
, has now filed a motion to dismiss its appeal . We
grant the motion and dismiss th e appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, B aker, and Triana
Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: May 8, 2019

Do Not Publish