alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCCareer OpportunitiesWorking at NRCNRC EthicsSummaries of Major Ethics Rules

# NRC Title or Position

The standards of conduct (5 CFR 2635.702) prohibit employees from using their NRC title or position for personal gain or the gain of anyone else. It also prohibits employees from appearing to show preferential treatment to or endorsing anyone.

*Example: An NRC employee may not appear in a television commercial in which she endorses a product manufactured by a private company by stating that the NRC considers it one of the best available.*

*Example: An NRC employee may not use his official title or refer to his NRC title or position in a book jacket endorsement of a novel written by a friend. He also cannot do so in a book review published in a newspaper.*

*Example: An NRC employee who teaches a course cannot allow the university to use his NRC in a publication unless it includes other biographical information, such as his education or other work experience.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Financial Interests
          - Impartiality
          - Security Ownership Restrictions
          - Gifts
          - Bribery
          - NRC Time and Property
          - NRC Title or Position
          - Nonpublic Information
          - Outside Employment
          - Supplementing Federal Salary
          - Teaching, Speaking, or Writing
          - Fundraising
          - Representations to the Government
          - Job Seeking
          - Post-Employment Restrictions
          - Expert Witness
          - Political Restrictions
          - Procurement Restrictions
          - Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act
          - Foreign Governments
          - Financial Disclosure (5 CFR Part 2634)

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 12, 2020
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION BY [EQUIVALENT OF] CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of EntreMed, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Neil J. Campbell, as President of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                        
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to EntreMed, Inc. and will be retained by EntreMed, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

|             |  |                                                       
|------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Neil J. CampbellNeil J. Campbell
President and COO
(No. 1136

Claimant awarded $1,800.00.)

#### Jacob Judnick, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 29,*1927.

Governmental *function*— State *Penitentiary at Statesville.*The State in conducting its State Penitentiary at Statesville exercises a governmental function and is not liable for injuries sustained by its employees therein, while in the performance of their duty.

Equity and good *conscience*— award *may he made.*Where an employee of the State is engaged in a hazardous and dangerous employment, an award will he made to him for injuries sustained and compensation fixed according to the provisions of the Workman’s Compensation Act.

John L. Walker, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Roy D. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

It appears from the records in this case that claimant was. *346on the 5th day of May, A. D. 1926, employed as a guard at the Illinois State Penitentiary located at Statesville, Illinois. On that day he was stationed outside of the door of the deputy warden’s office at said institution. On.the forenoon of that day, while performing his duties as such guard, he heard a violent commotion in the reception room, or otherwise known as the deputy warden’s office. He opened the door and found the deputy warden’s body on the floor, the said deputy warden having been violently attacked by six convicts, who killed him. This guard immediately tried to quell the disturbance, and that he was struck over the left arm by a sharp instrument, beaten around the body and struck on the forehead with a sharp instrument by said convicts and that he- was rendered unconscious. Claimant seeks to recover $2,500.00 for his in- • juries.

It is the opinion of this court that there is no legal liability on the part of the State. However, as a matter of equity and good conscience, it is the opinion of the court that this claim should be considered. There is no question as to the fact of claimant being injured in the course of his regular employment, and the evidence shows that he was engaged in a hazardous occupation and that he was in grave danger when he was injured from the attack of these convicts. However, this court, as a matter of precedent and statute, must follow the Workmen’s Compensation Act in measuring damages. It does not appear from the evidence that there is any permanent injury other than that of nervousness, which, of course, is a serious situation if it would continue. We assume from the testimony that this condition came from a shock and it is problematical as to how long it will continue.

It is the opinion of the court that, taking into consideration all the evidence and keeping in mind the rules of. the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the amount asked by the claimant exceeds that amount which should be allowed in this case. However, it is the policy of the court to be fair to the employees of the State, particularly those who are engaged in dangerous employment and .therefore the court recommends the allowance to claimant of $1,800.00.
###### Editorial Note on Part 126

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 126.303 Where must a concern submit its application for certification?

A concern seeking certification as a HUBZone small business concern must submit an electronic application to SBA's HUBZone Program Office via SBA's web page at *www.SBA.gov.* The application and any supporting documentation must be submitted by a person authorized to represent the concern.

[84 FR 65243, Nov. 26, 2019]