alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §473. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 473 was editorially reclassified as section 5118 of this title.
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2005 — Dedeu i Fontcuberta v Commission

(Case T-299/02) (1)

(Officials - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Work done for another State - Meaning of habitual residence)

(2005/C 330/43)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant(s): Carles Dedeu i Fontcuberta (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, J. Guillem Carrau, D. Domínguez Pérez and A. Sayagués Torres, lawyers)

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, Agent, assisted by J. Rivas Andrés and J. Gutiérrez Gisbert, lawyers)

Application for

annulment of the Commission's implied decision, rejecting the applicant's complaint of 23 September 2002, and its express decision to that effect of 14 November 2002, which refuse to pay the applicant the expatriation allowance under Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the allowances associated therewith

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 289 of 23.11.2002.

----
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Tumacácori
National Historical Park
Arizona


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Burial Record of Padre Kino
 Burial Record of Padre Kino**Year 1711**
**Padre Eusebio Francisco Kino**On the 15th of March, at a little before midnight and in receipt of the Holy Sacraments, Father Eusebio Francisco Quino died with great tranquility and edification in this house and village of Santa María Magdalena. He was seventy years of age and had been the missionary at Nuestra Señora de los Dolores for nearly twenty-four years.  It was founded by the same Father, who worked unwearyingly in continuous pilgrimages and conversions in all of this Pimería. He discovered the Casa Grande, the Gila and Colorado Rivers, and the Indian nations of the Cocomaricopas and the Yumas and the Guicamaspa of the Island. Resting in the Lord, he is buried in a coffin in this chapel of San Francisco Xavier on the Gospel side where the second and third foundation stones are laid down.  He was of the German nation from the province that belongs to Baveria, having been a missionary and cosmographer in the Californias before coming to the Pimería, during the time of Admiral Don Isidro de Otondo.Agustín de Campos, IHS
 Last updated: February 24, 2015
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: P.O. Box 8067
Tumacacori,
AZ
85640
 Phone: 520 377-5060 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Irving Balsom, Respondent, against American Biscuit Co. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from an award of disability compensation made pursuant to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant was injured during the course of his employment. Appellants assert however that he is barred by an election to bring a third party action and by his failure to prosecute the case. The evidence does not support this assertion. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Poster and Bussell, JJ.
#### John Quinn and James Quinn, Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. James O’Reilly, Respondent.

Order of the County Court of Kings county reve’-sed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and order directed for judgment allowing plaintiffs’ demurrer to defense and counterclaim pleaded in defendant’s amended answer, with costs, with leave to defendant to amend the amended answer within twenty days on payment of costs. The defendant’s defense is obviously insufficient in law upon its face. Defendant’s counterclaim is not of the character specified in section 501 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It states, if anything, a cause of *922action in tort which does not arise out of the contract or transaction set forth in the complaint as the foundation of plaintiff’s claim, and which is not connected with the subject-matter of the action. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hike to the Tall Trees Grove

Redwood National and State Parks
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3943 — Saint-Gobain/BPB)

(2005/C 320/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 November 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 82

**Question 82:** Will workers who enter a restricted area and have been determined to require monitoring under §20.1502(a) require monitoring in the controlled area (outside the restricted area)?

**Answer:** Yes, if the workers receive "occupational dose(s)" in the controlled area.

(References: 10 CFR 20.1003, 10 CFR 20.1502).

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                  UNITED TEXTILES & TOYS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                     EXHIBIT
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X


     The schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
financial  statements  for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND> 
       

<S>                                                  <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 2,826,080
<SECURITIES>                                                   0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                            367,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                            7,403,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      10,936,322
<PP&E>                                                 6,195,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (3,305,181)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        14,012,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 14,054,935
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  97,881
<OTHER-SE>                                            (1,989,306)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          14,012,810
<SALES>                                               18,189,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      18,189,858
<CGS>                                                 11,422,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          7,501,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       7,501,813
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       685,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,081,207)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,081,207)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0     
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,081,207)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.11)

        



</TABLE>
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Yucca House
National Monument
Colorado


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Frequently Asked Questions
 **What facilities are available at Yucca House?** There are no visitor facilities or services available, such as gasoline, food, water, or bathrooms. The closest gasoline and lodging are in Cortez, CO. Pets and camping are not allowed in Yucca House National Monument. Motor vehicles are allowed only on roadways, at pullouts, or in parking areas. Please pack out what you take in.
**What will I see at Yucca House?** You will see two areas with large mounds of rubble covered with vegetation. Toward the base of Ute Mountain is the “West Complex,” a large pueblo with an estimated 600 rooms, over 100 kivas, and a great kiva (that perhaps served the entire community). A productive spring flows through the middle of the complex. “Upper House,” the highest portion of the West Complex, rises 15 to 20 feet above the nearby architecture, dominating the surrounding landscape. It must have been an impressive building. To your east is the “Lower House” with some of the only visible standing masonry at the site. The “Lower House” is an L-shaped pueblo with at least eight first-story rooms. A low wall encloses the plaza with a great kiva at its center. Yucca House, one of the largest archeological sites in southwest Colorado, acted as an important community center for the Ancestral Puebloan people from A.D. 1150-1300.
**Can I get my National Park Passport stamped at Yucca House?** No, but the cancellation stamp is available at the front desk of the Chapin Mesa Museum at Mesa Verde National Park.
 Last updated: March 31, 2012
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: PO Box 8
Mesa Verde,
CO
81330
 Phone: 970-529-4465 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Eric A. Danziger, President and Chief Executive Officer of ZipRealty, Inc., certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ZipRealty, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:March 28, 2005 By: /s/ Eric A. Danziger       Eric A. Danziger   President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 3

Case 1:20-cv-22578-MGC Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-22578-MGC Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §174. Assignment of judges; decisions

(a) The judicial power of the United States Court of Federal Claims with respect to any action, suit, or proceeding, except congressional reference cases, shall be exercised by a single judge, who may preside alone and hold a regular or special session of court at the same time other sessions are held by other judges.

(b) All decisions of the Court of Federal Claims shall be preserved and open to inspection.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 898; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §105(a), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 27; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §243 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §138, 36 Stat. 1136).

This section is based on the first sentence of section 243 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. The remainder of said section is incorporated in section 175 of this title.

Words "the seat of government" were substituted for "the city of Washington" to conform to similar language respecting the Supreme Court. (See section 2 of this title.)

Words "to be fixed by rule of court" were added to provide greater flexibility in administering the business of the court. For similar provisions covering the district courts, see section 138 of this title.

Word "term" was substituted for "session" for uniformity.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court" in subsec. (a) and "Court of Federal Claims" for "Claims Court" in subsec. (b).

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to assignment of judges (formerly contained in section 175) for provisions relating to terms of court. See section 173 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.
#### § 107.1930 Effect of changes in this part 107 on transactions previously consummated.

The legality of a transaction covered by the regulations in this part is governed by the regulations in this part in effect at the time the transaction was consummated, regardless of later changes. Nothing in this part bars SBA enforcement action with respect to any transaction consummated in violation of provisions applicable at the time, but no longer in effect.
PUBLIC LAW 109–15—JUNE 17, 2005 119 STAT. 337

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1760:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

May 16, considered and passed House.

May 26, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–15

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 215 Martin

Luther King, Jr. Boulevard in Madison, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Robert M. La Follette,

Sr. Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

215 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard in Madison, Wisconsin,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert M. La Follette,

Sr. Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert

M. La Follette, Sr. Post Office Building’’.

Approved June 17, 2005.

June 17, 2005

[H.R. 1760]
Exhibit 10.18  [instacare10ka123109ex1018001.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018002.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018003.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018004.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018005.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018006.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018007.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018008.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018009.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018010.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018011.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018012.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018013.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018014.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018015.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018016.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018017.jpg]   [instacare10ka123109ex1018018.jpg]
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.913 Limitations on any contributions by a Licensee.

Subject to part 107 of this chapter, a Licensee may provide financing for all or part of the Borrower's contribution to the Project. SBA will consider Licensee funds to be derived from federal sources if the Licensee has Leverage (as defined in § 107.50 of this chapter). If the Licensee does not have Leverage, SBA will consider the investment to be from private funds. Licensee financing must be subordinated to the 504 loan and must not be repaid at a faster rate than the Debenture. (Refer to § 120.930(a) for additional limitations.)

[68 FR 57987, Oct. 7, 2003]
#### Milton Weil, Respondent, v. G. Dexter Richardson, Appellant.

Order modified by denying motion to strike out 34th paragraph of amended answer, and by striking out the provision of the order requiring defendant to serve an amended answer, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
(No. 728

Claimant awarded $120.90.)

#### American Bottle Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 14, 1924.*

Franchise *tax*— when *award may he made.*There being no dispute as to the facts and law in this case the court recommends an allowance to claimant of the amount of its claim.

Brown, Geddes, Schmettau & Williams, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for the payment of fees to the Secretary of State by the claimant corporation on the matter of franchise taxes amounting to $120.90. The Attorney General, coming into court, files a .consent to an award stating that the Attorney General’s office had investigated the facts in the case as they appear of record in the office of the Secretary of State and he represents to the court that from such investigation he finds the facts alleged in said claim and that the sum of $120.90 is now due the said claimant.

It is therefore recommended by the court that said claimant be allowed the sum of $120.90.
### §2638. New grounds in support of a civil action

In any civil action under section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in which the denial, in whole or in part, of a protest is a precondition to the commencement of a civil action in the Court of International Trade, the court, by rule, may consider any new ground in support of the civil action if such new ground—

(1) applies to the same merchandise that was the subject of the protest; and

(2) is related to the same administrative decision listed in section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 that was contested in the protest.

(Added Pub. L. 96–417, title III, §301, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1736.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in text, is classified to section 1515 of Title 19, Customs Duties.

Section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in par. (2), is classified to section 1514 of Title 19.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2638, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 982; June 2, 1970, Pub. L. 91–271, title I, §119, 84 Stat. 281, related to decisions, findings of fact and conclusions of law, and effect of opinions, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 96–417. See section 2645 (a) and (c) of this title.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Yellowstone
National Park
ID, MT, WY


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Wildland Fire
 Last updated: September 23, 2022
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: PO Box 168
Yellowstone National Park,
WY
82190-0168
 Phone: 307-344-7381 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr