alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: perals@gtlaw.com

To: FLSDdb_efile Ruiz

Cc: CoulsonD@gtlaw.com; GillenwaterJ@gtlaw.com

Subject: VSB 305, LLC et al. v. Sky Group USA, LLC et al. - CASE NO. 1:20-CV-22257

Date: Friday, August 27, 2021 8:28:09 PM

Attachments: image001.png

Greenberg Traurig P.A."s Notice of Compliance.pdf

CAUTION - EXTERNAL: 

Your Honor,

In accordance with the Court’s Order Granting Motion to Withdraw David A. Coulson, James E.

Gillenwater, Stephanie Peral, and Greenberg Traurig, P.A. as Counsel for Defendants [D.E. 28] (the

“Order”), Greenberg Traurig, P.A. certifies that it has sent a copy of the Order to both Defendants’

last known addresses. Attached please find our notice of compliance.

Best,

Stephanie

Stephanie Peral

Associate

(pronouns: she/her/hers)

Greenberg Traurig, P.A.

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue | Miami, FL 33131

T +1 305.579.0860 | F +1 305.961.5535

perals@gtlaw.com | www.gtlaw.com | View GT Biography

If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email,

please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster@gtlaw.com, and do not use or

disseminate the information.

CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution

when opening attachments or clicking on links.

Case 1:20-cv-22257-RAR Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2021 Page 1 of 3
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:20-CV-22257 

VSB 305, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability 

Company; and JOHANNA SEGURA, an

individual, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

SKY GROUP USA, LLC., Florida Limited 

Liability Company; and EFRAIN 

BETANCOURT an individual, 

Defendants. /

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH COURT’S ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW DAVID A. COULSON, JAMES E. GILLENWATER, STEPHANIE 

PERAL, AND GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS

In accordance with the Court’s Order Granting Motion to Withdraw David A. Coulson, 

James E. Gillenwater, Stephanie Peral, and Greenberg Traurig, P.A. as Counsel for Defendants 

[D.E. 28] (the “Order”), undersigned counsel certifies that it has sent a copy of the Order to both 

Defendants’ last known addresses. 

Dated: August 27, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 

GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. 

333 SE 2nd Avenue 

Miami, FL 33131 

Telephone: (305) 579-0500

Facsimile: (305) 579-0717

/s/ Stephanie Peral 

DAVID A. COULSON 

Florida Bar No. 176222

coulsond@gtlaw.com

cruzm@gtlaw.com

flservice@gtlaw.com

JAMES E. GILLENWATER

Florida Bar No. 1013518

gillenwaterj@gtlaw.com

Case 1:20-cv-22257-RAR Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2021 Page 2 of 3
2 

collazoe@gtlaw.com

flservice@gtlaw.com

STEPHANIE PERAL

Florida Bar No. 119324 

perals@gtlaw.com

collazoe@gtlaw.com

flservice@gtlaw.com

Case 1:20-cv-22257-RAR Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2021 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 10.21


 


AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment (this
“Amendment”) to that certain Employment Agreement dated October 1, 2020 (the “Agreement”)
by and between Black Ridge Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) and Ira Goldfarb (the “Employee”)
is entered into effective as of January 4, 2021 (the “Amendment Date”).


 


W I T N E S S E T H


 


WHEREAS, Section
3(a) of the Agreement provides, in part, for Employee’s compensation to be paid partially by grant of 90,667 shares of the
Company’s common stock over a period of time; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and the Employee wish to amend the payment schedule of such equity compensation as set forth below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the premises, the Agreement is amended as follows:


 


		1.	The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:



 


“Beginning on the Effective
Date and through December 31, 2021, the Company shall compensate the Employee through the issuance of 6,044 shares per month of
common stock of the Company to the Employee, in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll procedures and shall issue
in January 2021 the amounts for October through December 2020.”


 


The remainder of Section 3(a) of
the Agreement is not affected by the Amendment.


 


		2.	The remainder of the Agreement is unaffected by this Amendment, continues in full force, and is
hereby ratified and affirmed as of the date hereof.



 


		3.	This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, including by electronic signature, each
of which shall be considered an original and all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.



 


[Certification on following page.]


 


 


 


 






    	 	 	 



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


BLACK RIDGE OIL & GAS INC.


 


 


 


By: ____________________________________


Name: Brad Burke


Title: Chief Financial Officer


 


 


 


EMPLOYEE


 


 


 


________________________________________ 


Ira Goldfarb
日本人

AMERICATHEBEAUTIFUL

THE NATIONAL PARKS AND FEDERAL RECREATIONAL LANDS PASS 

世界クラスのレクリエーションはアメリカの公有地で

アウトドア、合衆国の歴史、野生生物、世界でも珍し

い驚異の大自然のなど、訪れる方々の様々な興味を

満たしてくれるのがアメリカの公有地です。公有地

で、白頭ワシが頭上を舞い、野生のバッファローが

草を食むアメリカのワイルド・ウエストに足を踏み

入れたり、アメリカの自由のために戦った南北戦争

の戦場跡を歩いたりすることができます。また、グラ

ンド・キャニオンの急流下り、ユタ州南部の赤い岩

の大地を豪快に巡る四輪駆動の旅、ロッキー山脈

で山の頂上を目指す登山など、冒険好きにも様々

な体験が待ち受けています。目的は様々でも、誰も

が忘れられない経験となるアメリカの連邦政府レク

リエーション地区や国立公園。是非体験してみては

いかがでしょうか。

一つのパスで千の可能性

America the Beautiful—the National Parks and 

Federal Recreational Lands Annual Pass(国立公

園及び連邦政府レクリエーション地区の年間パス)

で、アメリカの公有地を格安且つ簡単に訪れるこ

とができます。年間パス一つで二千箇所以上の国

立公園や国有林、野生生物保護区、史跡、戦場跡、

その他多数の公有地に入場できます。年間パスに

は入場料または基本施設使用料が含まれ、有効期

間は購入日の同月から一年間です。殆どの場所で

は、自家用車で訪問された場合、年間パスには所

持者及び同乗者全員の入場料が含まれます。入場

料が各個人に課せられる場所は、年間パスには大

人四人分の入場料金が含まれます(16歳未満のお

子様は無料)。年間パスの料金は80ドルで、事前に

「www.recreation.gov/pass」にて購入することが出

来ます。若しくは、入場料が課される連邦政府レクリ

エーション地区到着時に購入することも出来ます。

Photo: Grand Canyon N.P. by NPS 
AMERICATHEBEAUTIFUL

THE NATIONAL PARKS AND FEDERAL RECREATIONAL LANDS PASS 

Photo: Redwood N.P by Jessica Watz 

質問回答

よくある質問

問:年間パスはどこで購入できますか。

答:年間パスは、パスを使用できる連邦政府

地区など、アメリカ中の数百箇所で購入可

能です。メールや電話による注文について

はwww.recreation.gov/passをご覧下さい。

問:年間パスにはキャンプ料金やその他の

料金も含まれますか。

答:年間パスには入場料又は基本施設使用

料のみが含まれます。キャンプ場、ボート、

ツアー、その他の使用料金はそれぞれの場

所で支払いが必要となります。また、連邦政

府レクリエーション地区内の個人の業者に

委託、運営されている施設や事業所では、

年間パスを使用できない所もありますので

ご注意下さい。年間パスの使用可否や各料

金については各公園に直接お問い合わせ

下さい。

問:年間パスはすべての連邦政府レクリエ

ーション地区で使用可能ですか。

答:地区により年間パスが使用出来ない場

所があります(the Army Corps of Engineers

管轄区など)。また、多くの地区は無料とな

問:学生割引、高齢者割引、身障者割引はあ

りますか。

答:学生割引はありません。高齢者割引と身

障者割引は、アメリカ市民及び永住者のみ

適用可能です。年間パスはどなたも購入可

能です。

問:年間パスには何名まで署名出来ますか。

答:二名までです。署名者二名の親族関係

は問いません。使用時、どちらかの署名者が

居合わせる必要があります。

問:同乗者が4人以上の場合、年間パスは

いくつ必要ですか。

答:料金が車両一台につきの料金の場合、

パスには同乗者全員の入場料金が含まれ

ます。

問:一家族が車両二台で旅行をしている場

合、年間パス一つで二台分が含まれますか。

答:年間パスは、一つで車両一台分となりま

す。二台の場合はパスが二つ必要です。

問:二輪車の場合はどうですか。

答:一つの年間パスで、署名者二名が同時

に二台の二輪車で到着された場合のみ、そ

の二台の入場料金が含まれます。同乗者数

は関係ありません。

問:無人の場所での年間パスの提示方法は。

答:無料の下げ札を使用し車内のバックミ

ラーに下げるか、車内のダッシュボードに署

名側が見えるように置いて下さい。屋根の

無い車両(ジープや二輪車など)の場合、年

間パスのステッカーを事前に入手し、車両

に貼付けて置いて下さい。

問:盗難・紛失したパスは再発行が可能で

すか。

答:プライバシーや発行数量などの問題に

より、盗難又は紛失した場合、再発行は出来

ません。新たな購入が必要となります。

問:年間パスを持参し忘れ、料金を支払った

場合、後に返金を請求出来ますか。

答:返金の請求は出来ません。年間パスの

注文用紙やクレジットカードのレシート、年

間パスの入っていない下げ札は、年間パス

の代わりにはなりません。

っています。 参加機関: National Park Service • US Forest Service • US Fish and Wildlife Service • Bureau of Land

Management and Bureau of Reclamation
#### § 108.691 Responsibilities of NMVC Company during examination.

You must make all books, records and other pertinent documents and materials available for the examination, including any information required by the examiner under § 108.620(c). In addition, the agreement between you and the independent public accountant performing your audit must provide that any information in the accountant's working papers be made available to SBA upon request.
### §610b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–534, §3, Sept. 28, 1968, 82 Stat. 884, which related to title to lands acquired pursuant to this subchapter, tax exemptions for lands within the boundaries of the Swinomish Indian Reservation, and prohibition of restrictions on lands outside such boundaries, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Moderate Hike up to the Bamboo Forest

Haleakalā National Park
#### Maria Orsolina, Respondent, v. John Ruggiero and Another, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Vietnam Veterans Memorial
District of Columbia
ex421





  EXHIBIT
4.21







	


Extension of Debenture Maturity Date







	

TO

	

Intellipharmaceutics
International Inc. (the “Company”)


 


	

RE:


 

	

Debenture
dated May 1, 2019, with an original face amount of US$1,050,000
issued by the Company to Dr. Isa Odidi and Dr. Amina Odidi (the
“Debenture”) and
the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture) of such
Debenture


 







 

 


The
undersigned hereby agree that the Maturity Date of the Debenture
(currently March 31, 2020) is extended to May 15,
2020.

 


DATED
as of March 31, 2020.

    




 


	
/s/ Isa
Odidi


	
 /s/ Amina
Odidi



	Isa Odidi
	
 Amina Odidi
### §708. Continuation of partnership

#### (a) General rule

For purposes of this subchapter, an existing partnership shall be considered as continuing if it is not terminated.

#### (b) Termination

#### (1) General rule

For purposes of subsection (a), a partnership shall be considered as terminated only if no part of any business, financial operation, or venture of the partnership continues to be carried on by any of its partners in a partnership.

#### (2) Special rules

#### (A) Merger or consolidation

In the case of the merger or consolidation of two or more partnerships, the resulting partnership shall, for purposes of this section, be considered the continuation of any merging or consolidating partnership whose members own an interest of more than 50 percent in the capital and profits of the resulting partnership.

#### (B) Division of a partnership

In the case of a division of a partnership into two or more partnerships, the resulting partnerships (other than any resulting partnership the members of which had an interest of 50 percent or less in the capital and profits of the prior partnership) shall, for purposes of this section, be considered a continuation of the prior partnership.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 244; Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13504(a), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2141.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 115–97 struck out dash after "only if" and subpar. (A) designation before "no part" and struck out subpar. (B) which read as follows: "within a 12-month period there is a sale or exchange of 50 percent or more of the total interest in partnership capital and profits".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2017 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–97 applicable to partnership taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, see section 13504(c) of Pub. L. 115–97, set out as a note under section 168 of this title.
§ 6.8 Foreign filing. ( a ) *By Government.* ( 1 ) In every case where the employee has indicated pursuant to § 6.2(d)(10), his willingness to assign the domestic patent rights in the invention to the Government, or where it has been determined pursuant to § 6.5 that the Government shall obtain the entire domestic patent rights, the Government shall reserve an option to acquire assignment of all foreign rights including the rights to file foreign patent applications or otherwise to seek protection abroad on the invention.
( 2 ) The Government's option shall lapse as regards any foreign country: ( i ) When the Solicitor determines after consultation with the agency most directly concerned, not to cause an application to be filed in said foreign country or otherwise to seek protection of the invention, as by publication;
( ii ) When the Solicitor fails to take action to seek protection of the invention in said foreign country (*a*) within six months of the filing of an application for a United States patent on the invention, or (*b*) within six months of declassification of an invention previously under a security classification, whichever is later.
( b ) *By Employee.* ( 1 ) No Department employee shall file or cause to be filed an application for patent in any foreign country on any invention in which the Government has acquired the entire (foreign and domestic) patent rights, or holds an unexpired option to acquire the patent rights in said foreign country, or take any steps which would preclude the filing of an application by or on behalf of the Government.
( 2 ) An employee may file in any foreign country where the Government has not exercised its option acquired pursuant to § 6.2(d)(10), to do so, or determines not to do so.
( 3 ) The determination or failure to act as set forth in § 6.8(a)(2) shall constitute a decision by the Government to leave the foreign patent rights to the invention in the employee, subject to a nonexclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license to the Government in any patent which may issue thereon in any foreign country, including the power to issue sublicenses for governmental purposes or in furtherance of the foreign policies of the Government or both.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

MINNIE R. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

No. 99-2431

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg.

Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.

(CA-98-1604-5-23)

Submitted: March 31, 2000

Decided: April 21, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges,

and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Steven Michael Calcutt, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant.

Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, J. Rene Josey, United

States Attorney, John Berkley Grimball, Assistant United States

Attorney, Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Chief Counsel, Teresa H. Abbot,

Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Minnie R. Johnson appeals from the district court's order upholding the denial of social security disability insurance benefits. We

affirm.

Johnson suffers primarily from an injured back and related sciatica.

After a hearing on her application for benefits, an administrative law

judge ("ALJ") found that Johnson was impaired as a result of her disorders but that she was nonetheless capable of performing a full range

of sedentary work. Based on this finding, the ALJ concluded that she

was not eligible for disability insurance benefits. The Appeals Council upheld this determination, which became the final decision of the

Commissioner. Johnson sought review of this decision in the district

court, which granted summary judgment to the Commissioner. Johnson now appeals.

We find the arguments raised on appeal to be without merit. First,

Johnson does not satisfy all the criteria set forth at 20 C.F.R. Part 404,

Subpart P, § 1.05(c) (1999), and therefore was properly found not to

be disabled at the third step of the sequential evaluation process. Second, substantial evidence supports the ALJ's finding that Johnson had

no nonexertional impairments that would prevent performance of a

full range of sedentary work. Accordingly, the testimony of a vocational expert was not needed, and the ALJ properly relied on the

grids, which directed a finding of not disabled.

We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner's decision and that the correct law was applied. Therefore, we

affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
§ 109.450 SBA review of ILP Intermediary loans to Eligible Small Business Concerns. ( a ) *Review restrictions.* SBA does not review loans made by an ILP Intermediary under this program before approval of the loan by the ILP Intermediary. The ILP Intermediary is responsible for all loan decisions regarding eligibility (including size).
( b ) *Subsequent review.* SBA will periodically review loans made by an ILP Intermediary after approval of the loan by the ILP Intermediary as part of the on-site and off-site reviews described in § 109.510. If SBA discovers that an ILP Intermediary has made a loan under this program to an ineligible business or for an ineligible purpose, SBA will require the ILP Intermediary to refinance the ineligible loan with non-ILP program funds and to deposit into its ILP Relending Fund an amount equal to the outstanding principal balance on the ineligible loan.
Exhibit 4.429

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182250 dated April 06, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Communication services for the purpose of wire broadcasting

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 06, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 06, 2020 No. 145-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS,
   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119305
### §2344. Review of orders; time; notice; contents of petition; service

On the entry of a final order reviewable under this chapter, the agency shall promptly give notice thereof by service or publication in accordance with its rules. Any party aggrieved by the final order may, within 60 days after its entry, file a petition to review the order in the court of appeals wherein venue lies. The action shall be against the United States. The petition shall contain a concise statement of—

(1) the nature of the proceedings as to which review is sought;

(2) the facts on which venue is based;

(3) the grounds on which relief is sought; and

(4) the relief prayed.

The petitioner shall attach to the petition, as exhibits, copies of the order, report, or decision of the agency. The clerk shall serve a true copy of the petition on the agency and on the Attorney General by registered mail, with request for a return receipt.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(e), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 622.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 1034. | Dec. 29, 1950, ch. 1189, §4, 64 Stat. 1130. |

Statutes at Large

The section is reorganized, with minor changes in phraseology. The words "as prescribed by section 1033 of this title" are omitted as surplusage. The words "of the United States" following "Attorney General" are omitted as unnecessary.
HomeAbout NRCContact Us

# NRC Telephone Directory Search

Use the information in this Telephone Directory only for authorized government purposes. Personal solicitation of an employee is unlawful. You may also contact an expert. If you are unable to locate an expert, please contact our Office of Public Affairs.

**Switch Board**: Toll free: 1-800-368-5642 | Local: 301-415-7000 | TDD: 301-415-5575

**Office of Public Affairs**: 301-415-8200

## Directory Search

*(Enter at least two letters)*

Note that NRC no longer publishes a telephone directory NUREG/BR-0046. The information it contained is at this site. For security reasons, the NRC does not publish staff e-mail addresses in this online directory. If you wish to contact a staff member, you may find his or her telephone number in this directory. In addition, you may contact Public Affairs to have an inquiry passed to a staff member. Upon receiving the forwarded inquiry, the staff member will respond to you at their discretion.

## Additional Information

              - Functional Organization Descriptions
              - Organizational Chart  (PDF file)
              - Locations
              - Contact Us
              - Report a Safety or Security Concern
              - Report Waste Fraud and Abuse
              - Other Federal Government Agencies Telephone Listings

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 01, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Index of All Contact Pages
          - NRC Telephone Directory
          - NRC Vulnerability Disclosure Policy Information

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers- Question 445

**Question 445:** In this example, it has been determined that an individual is not likely to exceed 5 rems shallow dose equivalent from any sources with the possible exception of dose from hot particles. There is a potential that exposure to an individual from a hot particle may occur and that the dose to the individual from a hot particle, should it occur, may potentially exceed 5 rems shallow dose equivalent. In this circumstance, may the potential dose resulting from a potential exposure to a hot particle be disregarded for the purpose of the evaluation on the basis that the dose is not likely to exceed 10% of the applicable limit? Note that the scope of this question is limited to the requirements for individual monitoring (§20.1502) and is not intended to address the general requirements for radiological surveys (§20.1501).

**Answer:** Yes. The fact that an individual has the potential to receive a dose does not mean that the individual is likely to receive the dose. [Note: It should also be recognized that individual monitoring devices (personal dosimeters) are not appropriate for measuring doses from hot particles on or near the skin.]

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1502)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017