alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1558-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-1558-DR), dated September 20, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 30, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of West Virginia is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 20, 2004:

Clay, Logan, and Putnam Counties for Public Assistance. 

Mingo County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-22677 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
§ 106.301 What are the minimum requirements applicable to Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activities? While SBA may subject a Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activity to additional requirements through internal policy and procedure, the following requirements apply to all Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activities: ( a ) A Fee Based Record must be prepared by the Responsible Program Official in advance of the activity;
( b ) Any Participant Fees charged will not exceed the minimal amount needed to cover the anticipated direct costs of the activity;
( c ) Gifts of cash accepted and the collection of Participant Fees for Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activities are subject to the applicable requirements in this part, internal SBA policies and procedures as well as applicable U.S. Treasury rules and guidelines; and
( d ) Written approval must be obtained as outlined in § 106.303.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5022 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5022

 To allow recipients of certain loans made or guaranteed by the Small 
 Business Administration to use the loan proceeds to provide childcare 
             services to employees, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2022

Ms. Ernst (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, and 
  Mr. Peters) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow recipients of certain loans made or guaranteed by the Small 
 Business Administration to use the loan proceeds to provide childcare 
             services to employees, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Childcare Development of Employee 
Solutions for Early Rearing in Towns with Shortages Act'' or the 
``Childcare DESERTS Act''.

SEC. 2. CHILDCARE SERVICES AS ALLOWABLE EXPENSE UNDER BUSINESS LOAN AND 
              504/CDC LOAN PROGRAMS.

    (a) Business Loans.--Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 636(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(38) Childcare services.--The Administration may 
        guarantee loans under this subsection to a small business 
        concern for which the proceeds are used to provide childcare 
        services to members of the immediate family of employees of the 
        small business concern.''.
    (b) 504/CDC Loans.--Section 502(1) of the Small Business Investment 
Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 696(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``borrower to'' and inserting the 
        following: ``borrower--
                    ``(A) to'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A), as so designated, by striking 
        ``and for a'' and inserting the following: ``; and
                    ``(B) for--
                            ``(i) a''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (B), as so designated--
                    (A) in clause (i), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) providing childcare services to 
                        members of the immediate family of employees of 
                        the small business concern.''.
    (c) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration, in partnership with the Assistant Secretary of the 
Administration for Children and Families, shall issue regulations to 
implement the amendments made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 41.130 Effect of employment opportunities.

The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated because employment opportunities in any occupation or profession are or may be more limited for members of one sex than for members of the other sex.
§ 9239.5-1 Ores. ( a ) For ores trespass in a State where there is no State law governing such trespass, the measure of damages will be as follows: ( 1 ) Measure of damages is the same as in the case of coal. Benson Mining and Smelting Co. v. Alta Mining and Smelting Co. (145 U.S. 428, 36 L. ed. 762; Durant Mining Co. v. Percy Consolidated Mining Co. (93 Fed. 166)).
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-mj-8216-BER

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

DANIEL SLATER,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER RE: DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS 

Congress has amended the Rules of Criminal Procedure to instruct the Court to remind 

counsel of the disclosure obligation of the prosecutor under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 

(1963). That is, under Brady, the Government has a constitutional duty to disclose all materially 

exculpatory evidence in its possession to the defense. This evidence, also known as Brady 

material, includes any evidence that goes toward negating the defendant’s guilt, that would reduce 

the defendant’s potential sentence, or that goes to the credibility of a witness. The defendant is 

entitled to this information whether or not it is requested. Such materially favorable evidence must 

be turned over even if not subject to discovery under Rule 16(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure. The guide for materiality is a reasonable probability of a different result. See Kyles v. 

Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 433 (1995). If materiality is debatable, the Government should submit it 

to the Court for an in camera inspection, as instructed by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. 

Jordan, 316 F.3d 1215 (2003).

Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Consequences of a Brady violation are serious: First, nothing is more damaging to public 

trust in our criminal justice system than the idea the Government convicted the defendant by 

withholding evidence: without public trust our system does not work. Second, the evidence may 

be suppressed, and the conviction may be reversed. Third, professional consequences may ensue 

for the individuals who are determined to have wrongfully withheld information. Of course, it 

goes without saying that their individual reputations will be severely damaged in their legal 

community.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach in the Southern District of 

Florida, this 4

th day of November, 2020.

DAVE LEE BRANNON 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### § 9239.7 Right-of-way.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Wrangell - St Elias
National Park & Preserve
Alaska


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Subsistence Hunting in Wrangell-St. Elias
 Both federal subsistence and State of Alaska sport hunting are permitted in Wrangell-St. Elias National Preserve. State sport harvests are regulated by the Alaska Board of Game while federal subsistence harvests are regulated by the Federal Subsistence Board.
Subsistence Hunting is permitted in both the Park and Preserve.
Sport Hunting is permitted in the Preserve ONLY.To be eligible to hunt in the park or preserve under federal subsistence regulations, you must be considered a local, rural resident. Are YOU eligible to subsistence hunt?
Federal subsistence hunting permits are available at park visitor centers.
 Last updated: December 15, 2021
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve
PO Box 439
Mile 106.8 Richardson Highway
Copper Center,
AK
99573
 Phone: 907 822-5234 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
### [§1201. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13001(b)(2)(A), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2096]

Section, Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 320; Mar. 13, 1956, ch. 83, §5(7), 70 Stat. 49; Pub. L. 86–69, §3(f)(2), June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 140; Pub. L. 87–834, §8(g)(3), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 999; Pub. L. 91–172, title V, §511(b), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 635; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(135), (b)(33)(L), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1786, 1801; Pub. L. 95–600, title IV, §§401(a), 403(a), (b), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2866, 2868; Pub. L. 96–222, title I, §104(a)(2)(B), (3)(A), Apr. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 214, 215; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title II, §211(b)(16), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 756; Pub. L. 99–514, title III, §311(a), title X, §1024(c)(14), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2219, 2408; Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1003(c)(1), title II, §2004(l), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3384, 3606; Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13221(c)(2), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 477; Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §1703(f), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1876; Pub. L. 105–34, title III, §314(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 842; Pub. L. 110–234, title XV, §15311(a), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1502; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XV, §15311(a), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2264; Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title III, §334(a), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3108, related to alternative tax for corporations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, see section 13001(c)(1) of Pub. L. 115–97, set out as an Effective Date of 2017 Amendment note under section 11 of this title.

#### Extension of Special Rule Relating to Qualified Timber Gain

Pub. L. 115–123, div. D, title I, §40310, Feb. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 147, provided that: "For purposes of applying section 1201(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to taxable years beginning during 2017, such section shall be applied by substituting '2016 or 2017' for '2016'."
### §684. Recognition of gain on certain transfers to certain foreign trusts and estates

#### (a) In general

Except as provided in regulations, in the case of any transfer of property by a United States person to a foreign estate or trust, for purposes of this subtitle, such transfer shall be treated as a sale or exchange for an amount equal to the fair market value of the property transferred, and the transferor shall recognize as gain the excess of—

(1) the fair market value of the property so transferred, over

(2) the adjusted basis (for purposes of determining gain) of such property in the hands of the transferor.

#### (b) Exception

Subsection (a) shall not apply to a transfer to a trust by a United States person to the extent that any person is treated as the owner of such trust under section 671.

#### (c) Treatment of trusts which become foreign trusts

If a trust which is not a foreign trust becomes a foreign trust, such trust shall be treated for purposes of this section as having transferred, immediately before becoming a foreign trust, all of its assets to a foreign trust.

(Added Pub. L. 105–34, title XI, §1131(b), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 978; amended Pub. L. 107–16, title V, §542(e)(1)(A)–(C), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 84, 85; Pub. L. 111–312, title III, §301(a), Dec. 17, 2010, 124 Stat. 3300.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 1131(b) of Pub. L. 105–34 amended sections 367, 721, and 1035 of this title.

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–312 amended catchline, introductory provisions of subsec. (a), and subsec. (b) to read as if amendment by Pub. L. 107–16, §542(e)(1)(A)–(C), had never been enacted. See 2001 Amendment note below. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "Exceptions.—

"(1) Transfers to certain trusts.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to a transfer to a trust by a United States person to the extent that any United States person is treated as the owner of such trust under section 671.

"(2) Lifetime transfers to nonresident aliens.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to a lifetime transfer to a nonresident alien."

2001—Pub. L. 107–16, §542(e)(1)(A)–(C), amended section by inserting "and nonresident aliens" after "estates" in section catchline and "or to a nonresident alien" after "or trust" in introductory provisions of subsec. (a) and amending subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, text of subsec. (b) read as follows: "Subsection (a) shall not apply to a transfer to a trust by a United States person to the extent that any person is treated as the owner of such trust under section 671."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–312 applicable to estates of decedents dying, and transfers made after Dec. 31, 2009, except as otherwise provided, see section 301(e) of Pub. L. 111–312, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2010 Amendment note under section 121 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 2001 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–16 applicable to transfers after Dec. 31, 2009, see section 542(f)(2) of Pub. L. 107–16, set out as a note under section 121 of this title.
### §954. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 86–339, §4, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 604; Pub. L. 90–597, Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1164, which related to powers and duties of guardians, conservators, and other fiduciaries, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [CCB/CPD File Nos. 97-39, 97-41; DA 04-3156] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice; termination of proceedings. 

# SUMMARY:

This document is a notification of final termination of the petitions for waiver of the 6.5 percent productivity-based “X-factor” for price cap local exchange carriers adopted by the Commission in a 1997 order. The petitions for waiver have been withdrawn by the petitioners. No oppositions to the prior notice of terminations were received; therefore, interested parties are hereby notified that these proceedings have been terminated. 

# DATES:

These proceedings were terminated effective September 16, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jennifer McKee, Wireline Competition Bureau, Pricing Policy Division, (202) 418-1530. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 5, 2004, the Wireline Competition Bureau's Pricing Policy Division issued a Public Notice that the proceedings addressing the Citizens and SNET petitions for waiver of the 6.5 percent X-factor would be terminated effective 30 days after publication of the Public Notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    , unless the Bureau received oppositions to the terminations before that date. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 17, 2004.                     *See*69 FR 51079, August 17, 2004. The Bureau did not receive any oppositions to the terminations of these proceedings within 30 days of Federal Register publication of the notice; therefore, these proceedings were terminated as of September 16, 2004.                 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 152, 153, 154, 155; 44 FR 18501, 67 FR 13223, 47 CFR 0.291, 1.749. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Michelle M. Carey, 

Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 04-22756 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
460 P.2d 261

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Lavurn McFERRAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8937.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Nov. 7, 1969.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 301 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, 80 N.M. 622, 459 P.2d 148.
§ 101.405 How does the Administrator respond to comments? ( a ) If a state process provides a recommendation to SBA through its single point of contact, the Administrator: ( 1 ) Accepts the recommendation; or
( 2 ) Reaches a mutually agreeable solution with the state process; or
( 3 ) Provides the single point of contact with a written explanation of the decision in a form the Administrator deems appropriate. The Administrator may also supplement the written explanation by telephone or other means.
( b ) In any explanation under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the Administrator informs the single point of contact that— ( 1 ) SBA will not implement its decision for at least 10 days after the single point of contact receives the explanation; or
( 2 ) Because of unusual circumstances the waiting period of at least 10 days is not feasible.
( c ) For purposes of computing the waiting period under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a single point of contact is presumed to have received written notification 5 days after the date of mailing.
#### Fenton E. MacCallum, Respondent, v. Fred Beal et al., Defendants, and Real Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Fred Tate, Petitioner, against John M. Beckmann, as Commissioner of Police of the County of Nassau, Respondent.

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the Commissioner of Police of the County of Hassau dismissing petitioner, a patrolman of the Police Department of Hassau County, after a hearing upon charges. Determination dismissing petitioner annulled on the law and the facts, with $50 costs and disbursements, and the respondent ordered to reinstate petitioner to his position as a member of the Police Department of the County of Hassau. There was no proof adduced upon the hearing of the facts necessary to be proved to authorize the determination that petitioner had violated either rule 69E, or rule 154 of the Rules and Regulations of the Police Department, with which violations he was charged. The burden was upon the officials making the charges to prove such facts, not upon the petitioner to disprove them. *(People ex rel. Gilson*v. *Gibbons,*231 H. Y. 171,177; *Matter of Weber*v. *Town of Cheehtowaga,*284 H. Y. 377, 380; *Matter of Miller*v. *Tiling,*291 H. Y. 65, 69.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
#### § 5473.1 Application.

In order to be considered, written requests for extension shall be delivered to the appropriate BLM office prior to the expiration of the time for cutting and removal.

[57 FR 37477, Aug. 19, 1992]