alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2003N-0565]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Generic Food and Drug Administration Rapid Response Surveys” has been                               ( print page 58176)                            approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of May 6, 2004, (69 FR 25404), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0500.  The approval expires on February 28, 2006.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: September 22, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-21748 Filed 9-28-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
| NODIS Library | Procurement, Small Business and Industrial Relations(5000s) | Search | 

NASA

Procedural

Requirements

NPR 5800.1E 

Effective Date: October 19, 2000

Expiration Date: March 31, 2011

COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY

Grant And Cooperative Agreement Handbook (14 CFR 1260)

Responsible Office: Office of Procurement

Click here to retrieve this document.

NPR 5800.1E -- TOC Verify Current version before use at:

http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/ Page 1 of 1 

NPR 5800.1E -- TOC Verify Current version before use at:

http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/ Page 1 of 1
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Yorktown Battlefield
Part of Colonial National Historical ParkVirginia
Exhibit 10.11


 





 






     


     


    

 





 






    2


     


    

 





 






    3


     


    

 





 






    4


     


    

 





 




    5
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ARAMARK Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Frederick Sutherland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    L. FREDERICK SUTHERLANDL. Frederick Sutherland
§ 4110.3 Changes in grazing preference. ( a ) The authorized officer will periodically review the grazing preference specified in a grazing permit or lease and make changes in the grazing preference as needed to: ( 1 ) Manage, maintain, or improve rangeland productivity;
( 2 ) Assist in making progress toward restoring ecosystems to properly functioning condition;
( 3 ) Conform with land use plans or activity plans; or
( 4 ) Comply with the provisions of subpart 4180 of this part.
( b ) The authorized officer will support these changes by monitoring, documented field observations, ecological site inventory, or other data acceptable to the authorized officer.
( c ) Before changing grazing preference, the authorized officer will undertake the appropriate analysis as required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*). Under NEPA, the authorized officer will analyze and, if appropriate, document the relevant social, economic, and cultural effects of the proposed action.
[71 FR 39504, July 12, 2006]
**Exhibit 13.1**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Bayer AG(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: March 15, 2005 /s/ Werner Wenning   Name:  Werner Wenning   Title:  Chairman of the Board of Management      Dated: March 15, 2005 /s/ Klaus Kühn   Name:  Klaus Kühn   Title:  Chief Financial OfficerMember of the Board of Management
VIA	Rail	Inc.	– Accessible	sleeper	– Top	view (Uwe	Rutenberg)

(Drawings	and	pictures	used	with	permission	of	VIA	Rail	Canada	Inc.		These	

images	are	not	available	for	commercial	use.)

Fig. 1	Toilet/shower/vanity	section	with	main	entrance	at	right	side	(rear	of	

wheelchair)

Fig.	2	Left	side	shows	sleeper	section,	sofa	L-shape	was	eliminated,	now	just	straight	

along	left	wall
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hiking at Wind Cave

Wind Cave National Park
statutory limits is not "'cruel and unusual punishment unless the statute

fixing punishment is unconstitutional or the sentence is so unreasonably disproportionate to the offense as to shock the conscience." Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996) (quoting CuIverson v. State,95 Nev. 433, 435, 596 P.2d 220, 221-22 (1979)); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion) (explaining that Eighth Amendment does not require strict proportionality between crime and sentence; it forbids only an extreme sentence that is grossly disproportionate to the crime).

The district court sentenced appellant to a prison term of 60- 240 months, explaining that sentencing under the small habitual criminal statute was "fit and proper" based on O'Flaherty's prior criminal record, the timing of the instant offense in relation to her release from prison on a prior conviction, and the fact that this was a theft-related offense where she victimized society. Contrary to O'Flaherty's assertion, the record demonstrates that the district court did not rely on suspect information regarding her prior criminal history when imposing sentence. The sentence imposed is within the parameters provided by the relevant statute, see NRS 207.010(1)(a), and O'Flaherty does not allege that the statute is unconstitutional. We are not convinced that the sentence imposed is so grossly disproportionate to the crime and O'Flaherty's history of recidivism as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment. See Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11, 29 (2003) (plurality opinion). And we

### conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing.

Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Washoe County Alternate Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) I947A 

### 3
| Exhibit 23.1 |
|--------------|

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form   S-8 No.’s 333-87236 and333-105187 and Form S-3 No.’s 333-104886 and 333-109108) pertaining to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2003 Employee StockPurchase Plan, the 34 million shares of common stock of a selling stockholder, and the 4.25% Convertible Notes, respectively, ofExpressJet Holdings, Inc., of our report dated March 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and scheduleof ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLPHouston, TexasMarch 11, 2005

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.552 Lease.

If approved, the applicant must personally occupy the residence during the term of the lease and pay a reasonable rent to SBA. The lease will be for a period of at least 3 years, but no more than 5 years. A lease of less than 5 years may be renewed, but not beyond 5 years from the original lease date. During or at the end of the lease period, the lessee has a right of first refusal to reacquire the homestead property under terms and conditions no less favorable than those offered to any other purchaser.
### PART VI—POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONS

Sec.
527.
Political organizations.
### [§1238. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(a)(35), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–521]

Section, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 332; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1901(b)(3)(K), 1951(c)(2)(A), 90 Stat. 1793, 1840, related to amortization in excess of depreciation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

For provisions that nothing in repeal by Pub. L. 101–508 be construed to affect treatment of certain transactions occurring, property acquired, or items of income, loss, deduction, or credit taken into account prior to Nov. 5, 1990, for purposes of determining liability for tax for periods ending after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 11821(b) of Pub. L. 101–508, set out as a note under section 45K of this title.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 434

**Question 434:** How are occupational dose limits applied in regard to the revised Part 20 definition of "year"? The purpose of this question is to obtain additional clarification of the intent and application of the "year" as it is defined in the revised Part 20 and discussed previously in Question 40. Apparently, licensees may establish a year that is other than January 1 through December 31 (e.g., Question 40 addresses a year that is from January 31 of one year through January 30 of the following year). In responding to the question, consider the following example. A worker receives dose sequentially at facilities of two different licensees, the first licensee using a year of January 1 - December 31, and the second licensee using a year of January 31 - January 30. The worker receives 4 rems total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) at the facility of the first licensee during the period January 1 - January 30, and then transfers to the second licensee's facility, arriving for work on February 1. For work performed at the second licensee's facility, is the individual's remaining available TEDE 1 rem or 5 rems?

**Answer:** Five rems. For a particular licensee, the relevant time period for determining compliance with an annual dose limit is the year beginning and ending on the dates specified by that licensee, providing that the time period chosen by the licensee is consistent with the definition of "year" in 10 CFR 20.1003. In the example provided, the worker started work at the facility of the second licensee at the beginning of that licensee's "year" and, therefore, the worker had no prior occupational dose during that licensee's "year."

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1003)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
### **CHAPTER 7—LIQUOR LAW REPEAL AND ENFORCEMENT ACT**
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 466

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

MARIO SUAREZ , A ppellant ,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the 28 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Mario Suarez , attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated assault

.
The trial court has certified that this “ is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO
right of appeal, ” and “ the defendant has waived the right of appeal. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(a)(2).2

On August 22, 2013 , this Court notified appellant ’ s counsel of the trial court ’ s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether
appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel ’ s findings
as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence o f any amended certification.

On September 6, 2013 , counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel ’ s
response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is
incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be

dismissed if the trial court ’ s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of
appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, th is
appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 19th day of September, 2013

.
### §395. Leases of allotted lands where allottee is incapacitated

Whenever it shall be made to appear to the Secretary of the Interior that, by reason of age, disability, or inability, any allottee of Indian lands cannot personally, and with benefit to himself, occupy or improve his allotment or any part thereof, the same may be leased upon such terms, regulations, and conditions as shall be prescribed by the Secretary for a term not exceeding five years, for farming purposes only.

(May 31, 1900, ch. 598, 31 Stat. 229.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Act May 31, 1900, is applicable to "any allottee of Indian lands" and authorizes leases "for a term not exceeding five years, for farming purposes only" and supersedes the following prior provisions:

Act June 7, 1897, ch. 3, 30 Stat. 85.

Act June 10, 1896, ch. 398, 29 Stat. 340.

Act Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 188, 28 Stat. 900.

Act Aug. 15, 1894, ch. 290, 28 Stat. 305.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Other Leasing Provisions

Special provisions for leasing allotted lands on certain reservations named in Utah and in Wyoming, for cultivation under irrigation, were made by act Apr. 30, 1908, ch. 153, 35 Stat. 95, 97.

Special provisions permitting Indians to whom lands have been allotted on the Yakima Indian reservation in the State of Washington, to lease such lands for agricultural purposes for a term not exceeding 5 years, or unimproved lands for a term not exceeding 10 years were made by acts May 31, 1900, ch. 598, 31 Stat. 246; Mar. 1, 1899, ch. 324, 30 Stat. 941.
§ 44.30 How does the Department make payments for acquired lands? This section describes how the Department disburses payments for Acquisitions or Interest in Lands Acquired for Addition to the National Park System or National Forest Wilderness Areas (section 6904 payments). ( a ) The Department disburses section 6904 payments to qualified local governments only if the administering agency supplies the following information for each qualified local government: ( 1 ) Acreage or interests in land for which the payments are authorized; and
( 2 ) Any other information the Department may require to certify payments to each qualified local government.
( b ) The Department disburses payments under this section only for a period of 5 years from the date the land was conveyed to the United States.
§ 10010.12 Cooperating agencies. ( a ) The Commission will adhere to CEQ directives both in the designation of cooperating agencies for Commission sponsored NEPA procedures and in seeking designation as a cooperating agency for procedures sponsored by others. Any non-Federal agency may be a cooperating agency in Commission NEPA proceedings by agreement. The Commission will consult with the Office of the Solicitor in cases where such non-Federal agencies are also applicants before the Commission to determine cooperating agency responsibilities.
( b ) The Commission will inform the Office of the Solicitor of any agreements to assume cooperating agency status or any declinations pursuant to 40 CFR 1501.6
( c ) .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         5,896,600
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      74,000
<MORTGAGE>                                      17,900
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   72,000
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               6,372,700
<CASH>                                          36,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         317,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,276,200
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 369,400
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        5,473,600
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                199,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          219,600<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     530,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,276,200
<PREMIUMS>                                      77,400
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            371,500
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (4,200)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  14,400
<BENEFITS>                                     247,200
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     29,900
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            78,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (4,700)
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>(a) Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of subsidiary trusts
</FN>


</TABLE>
### [§44B. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §474(m)(1), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 833]

Section, added Pub. L. 95–30, title II, §202(a), May 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 141; amended Pub. L. 95–600, title III, §321(b)(1), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2834; Pub. L. 96–222, title I, §103(a)(6)(G)(i), (ii), Apr. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 210, related to credit for employment of certain new employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1983, and to carrybacks from such years, see section 475(a) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as an Effective Date of 1984 Amendment note under section 21 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.348 Amount of guarantee.

The maximum loan amount for any one International Trade (IT) loan is $5,000,000. IT loans may receive a maximum guaranty of 90 percent or $4,500,000, except that the maximum guaranty amount for any working capital component of an IT loan is limited to $4,000,000. To the extent that the Borrower has a separate EWCP loan or any other 7(a) loan for working capital, the guaranty amount for the other loan is counted against the $4,000,000 guaranty limit for the IT loan.

[76 FR 63546, Oct. 12, 2011]
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 179

**Question 179:** If a licensee implements the revised Part 20 in July, 1993, is the licensee required to go back and evaluate internal dose for the purpose of determining total effective dose equivalent for the year?

**Answer:**No. The footnote to 10 CFR 20.2104 (d), as amended in 57 FR 57877, 12/8/92, states, "Licensees are not required to partition historical dose between the external dose equivalent (s) and the internal committed dose equivalent (s)." As long as all of the licensee's worker's doses are below the old limits and/or the workers will not participate in planned special exposures, the licensee need not reevaluate prior doses before implementing the revised Part 20. However, the licensee must subtract the dose already received during the year from the new annual dose limits to find the limits for the remainder of the year, as explained in Question 1, Set 1.

(Reference: 20.1202, 10 CFR 20.2104)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, November 08, 2017