From: "Norman, Russell@Waterboards" <RNorman@waterboards.ca.gov>

SendTo: Maria Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

CopyTo: Robin Oshiro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,"'Christine.Wong@tetratech.com'"

< Christine.Wong@tetratech.com >

Subject: RE: [statepretcoord] State Pretreatment Coordinators'

conference call TODAY, June 13 at 2 PM Eastern

- Requested submission of

comments

DeliveredDate: 07/10/2012 02:58:49 PM

Hello Maria:

I have attached the information we were able to dig up from our Regional

Boards for Oil & Grease Local Limits. I just added these to the

spreadsheet we previously sent with the NPDES O&G limit info. We didn’t

get from on the local limits but, I think the limits reported are typical

for California.

Please contact me if you have any questio ns.

Thank you,

W. Russell Norman, P.E.

Water Resources Control Engineer

Statewide SSO Program

http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/sso

State Water Resources Control Board

Division of Water Quality

1001 I St, 15th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

rnorman@waterboards.ca.gov

Ph: (916) 323

- 5598

Fax: (916) 341

- 5463

<o))))>< This communication is privileged and confidential, and is

intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not

the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use, or disclose this

communication to others. <o))))><

Water is the driving force of all nature.

Leonardo da VinciRB Facility Limit Units Note

5R Redding 300 mg/l

5R Chico 300 mg/l

1 Crescent City 50 mg/l

1 Eureka 100 mg/l

1 Arcata 100 mg/l "fats,oils, or greases of animal or vegetable origin"

1 Arcata 200 ppm TPHFrom: "Knerr, Lisa A. " <Lisa.Knerr@dphe.state.co.us>

SendTo: Maria Gomez

- Taylo r/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,Robin Oshiro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: FW: State Pretreatment Coordinators' conference call TODAY,

June 13 a t 2 PM E astern

- Requested submission of c omments

DeliveredDate: 06/20/2012 0 4:48:13 PM

Maria and Robin,

Per our state regulation in C olorado, t he limit for oil and g rease is 1 0

mg/L as d etermined by the results of a ny single g rab sample. A numeric

effluent limit will be a ssigned in p ermits for discharges to s urface

waters, h owever, monitoring for a "visual s heen" will g enerally be

required. Where a visual sheen is d etected, the discharger will b e

required to c ollect a gr ab s ample and have it a nalyzed for oil a nd

grease.

Monitoring for oil and grease may be required where there is a reasonable

potential t hat oil and g rease will b e present i n the effluent at

concentrations at or above 10 mg/l. Check out the bottom of p age 3

(http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/regulations/wqccregs/62_2012(07).pdf).

Thiis for a direct discharger. For an in direct d ischarger, the limit

would

depend on the POTW’s local limits and any applicable ELGs along with the

general and specific pretreatment standards.

Lisa

Lisa Knerr

Environmental Protection Specialist

Water Quality Control Division

Colorado Department of P ublic Health a nd Environme nt

4300 Cherry C reek D rive South

Denver, C O 80246

- 1530

www.coloradowaterpermits.com

303

- 692

- 3004 | Lisa.Knerr@state.co.us

http://10.1.0.25/cdphegraphics/images/statesealanddepttitle.gif round

YouTub e

From: Russell Norman <RNorman@waterboards.ca.gov >

SendTo: Robin Oshiro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,Maria G omez

Taylor/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,<Christine.Wong@tetratech.com>

Subject: Re: [statepretcoord] State Pretreatment Coordinators'

conference call T ODAY, J une 13 a t 2 PM Ea stern

- Requested submission of

comments

Deli veredDate: 06/19/2012 0 1:46:35 PM

Body: Hello Christine:

The b reakdown i n California for O&G permit limits f or d irect d ischargers

with approved P T programs is a ll a re l ess t han 200 mg/l. See attached

list.

We're s till r esearching typical local limits in a pproved PT programs a nd

evaluating implementation issues a s requested i n question 2 be low.Thank you,

W. Russell Norman, P.E.

Water Resources Control Engineer

Statewide SSO Program

http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/sso

State Water Resources Control Board

Division of Water Quality

1001 I St, 15th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

rnorman@waterboards.ca.gov

Ph: (916) 323

- 5598

Fax: (916) 341

- 5463

<o))))>< This communication is privileged and conf idential, and is

intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not

the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use, or disclose this

communication to others. <o))))><

When the well is dry, we know the worth of water. B ENJAMIN FRANKLIN

(1706

- 1790), Poor Richard's Almanac, 1746

>>> "Wong, Christine" <Christine.Wong@tetratech.com> 6/13/2012 2:10 PM

>>>

HI All,

Per today’s state Coordinators’ call, this is the reminder to submit

comments about a) the potential new oil and grease method and b) the

proposed outline for the POTW Pretreatment Program Development Guidance

Manual.

Comments regarding:

(1) Do you have information on the typical concentration range for oil

and grease limits i n permits; what would be the breakdown of permits

above and below 200 mg/L? Please specify applicable limits for both

direct dischargers and indirect dischargers (and identify which are

which!).

(2) What implementation problems do you anticipate if EPA w ere to approve

the ASTM method? What would be the State and Regional burden if EPA goes

with approval with side

- by

- side data required?

should be sent to Maria Gomez

- Taylor (Gomez

- Taylor.Maria@epamail.epa.gov)

and Robin Oshiro (Oshiro.robin@Epa.gov) of EPA’s Office of Science and

Technology.

Comments about the proposed outline for the POTW Pretreatment Program

Development Guidance Manual should be sent to Robin Danesi

( Danesi.Robin@epamail.epa.gov ) of EPA’s Office of Wastewater Management.

Please se nd comments on these topics ASAP, as significant project efforts------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------ are being made in the near future.

Thank you!

~Christine

Christine Wong | Environmental Scientist IV

Phone: 703.385.6000, ext. 363 | Fax: 703.385.6007

christine.wong@tetratech.com

Tetra Tech | Complex World, Clear Solutions

10306 Eaton Place, Suite 340 | Fairfax, VA 22030

- 2201 | www.ttwater.com

PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include

privileged, confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or

use o f this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is

strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended

recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then

delete it from your system.

You are currently subscribed to statepretcoord as:

rnorman@waterboards.ca.gov

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to

leave

- 1268247

- 1941881.1a0717932b23d8d6f52dfb276b52edd9@lists.epa.gov

OR:

Use the listserver's web interface a t

https://lists.epa.gov/cgi

- bin/lyris.pl to manage your

subscription.

For problems with this list, contact statepretcoord

- Owner@lists.epa.gov

Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:26:24

- 0700

From: David Cooper < DCooper@waterboards.ca.gov>

To: Russell Norman <RNorman@waterboards.ca.gov>

Subject: NPDES Permit Effluent Limits

Content

- Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=__Part210F8350.2__="

MIME

- Version: 1.0

Hi Russ,

See the attached excel sheet for the Oil and Grea se limits. I grabbed

the NPDES dischargers from CIWQS and then searched their CA NPDES ID's in

ICIS to get the oil and grease limits from their permits. I just

searched facilities that have pretreatment programs since I though that

was the most applicabl e.

I noticed that the highest daily max allowable was 75 mg/L. Although

there were a few with the oil and grease parameter in their permit but no

established limit yet. I think there were about 3

- 5 of them. The only

one that I do remember was Sac R egional. These would be the only ones

with limits over 200 since they don't have a limit yet. All of the other

limits were below 75. I'll have to research which ones have monitoringrequirements for oil and grease but no established limit because I d idn't

mark them while recording the limits and didn't think about it until I

finished.

Let me know if you have any questions.

- David

- NPDES.permit.pretreatment.XLSXRB FACILITY NAMENPDES #Mo Avg Hi Wk Avg Daily MaxUnitsDESIGN FLOW1 Crescent City WWTPCA0022756254075mg/L1.862 MILLBRAE WWTPCA00375321020mg/L34 Ojai Valley WWTPCA0053961n/an/an/amg/L35R Stillwater WWTFCA0082589n/an/an/amg/L45S El Dorado Hills WWTPCA0078671n/an/an/amg/L42 BENICIA WWTPCA00380911020mg/L4.53 LOMPOC REGIONAL WWTPCA0048127510mg/L55S Brentwood WWTPCA00826601015mg/L51 Eureka City Elk River WWTPCA0024449254075mg/L5.242 BURLINGAME WWTPCA00377881020mg/L5.55F ATWATER WWTF (5C240100001)CA00791971015mg/L64 Saugus Water Reclamation PlantCA00543131015mg/L6.55R Oroville WWTPCA0079235n/an/an/amg/L6.52 NOVATO AND IGNACIO WWTPCA00379581020mg/L6.552 PETALUMA ELLIS CREEK WATER RECYCLING FACIL CA00378101020mg/L6.78 Henry N. Wochholz WWRFCA0105619n/an/an/amg/L6.73 SCRWA WWTPCA0049964n/an/an/amg/L7.55S Davis WWTPCA0079049n/an/an/amg/L7.58 WRCRWA Regional WWRFCA8000316n/an/an/amg/L82 City of Livermore Water Reclamation PlantCA00380081020mg/L8.55S White Slough Water Pollution Control FacilityCA0079243n/an/an/amg/L8.55R Clear Creek WWTPCA0079731n/an/an/amg/L8.85S Tracy WWTPCA0079154n/an/an/amg/L92 CENTRAL MARIN SAN. AGCY. WWTPCA00386281020mg/L105S Woodland Water Pollution Control FacilityCA0077950n/an/an/amg/L10.45S Yuba City WWTFCA0079260n/an/an/amg/L10.53 EL ESTERO WWTP NPDESCA0048143254075mg/L118 Corona WWRF No. 1CA8000383n/an/an/amg/L11.55F Merced WWTFCA0079219n/an/an/amg/L11.58 Rialto WWRFCA0105295n/an/an/amg/L11.73 WATSONVILLE WWTPCA0048216254075mg/L125R Chico Water Pollution Control PlantCA0079081n/an/an/amg/L125S Pleasant Grove WWTPCA0084573n/an/an/amg/L124 Burbank WWRPCA00555311015mg/L12.56B VICTOR VALLEY MUNI WTPCA0102822n/an/an/amg/L12.52 South San Francisco-San Bruno WQCPCA00381301020mg/L134 Ventura WRFCA00536511015mg/L144 Whittier Narrows Water Reclamation Plant, El Monte CA00537161015mg/L154 Pomona Water Reclamation PlantCA00536191015mg/L155S Easterly WWTPCA0077691n/an/an/amg/L152 NAPA SD WWTP (Soscol Water Recycling Facility) CA00375751020mg/L15.42 VALLEJO SFCD WWTPCA00376991020mg/L15.52 SAN MATEO WWTPCA00375411020mg/L15.74 Tapia WRFCA0056014510mg/L16.12 DELTA DIABLO SD WWTPCA00385471020mg/L16.5Oil & Grease Concentration Limits[03582]Programs = 79, Average Flow = 39.88 mgd, Max = 450 mgd, Min= 1.86 mgd3 SANTA CRUZ WWTPCA0048194254075mg/L172 FSSD SUBREGIONAL WWTPCA003802410mg/L17.55S Manteca WW Quality Control FacilityCA0081558n/an/an/amg/L17.58 Michelson WWRFCA8000326n/an/an/amg/L189 HARRF DISCH to San Elijo Ocean OutfallCA0107981254075mg/L185S Dry Creek WWTPCA0079502n/an/an/amg/L184 Los Angeles-Glendale WWRPCA00539531015mg/L205S Turlock WWTPCA0078948n/an/an/amg/L202 DUBLIN SAN RAMON SD WWTPCA00376131020mg/L20.24 Valencia Water Reclamation PlantCA00542161015mg/L21.69 LA SALINA WWTP, OCEANSIDE OCEAN OUTFALL CA0107433254075mg/L22.62 SBSA WWTPCA00383691020mg/L292 SUNNYVALE WPCPCA0037621510mg/L29.53 MRWPCA REG TRTMT & OUTFALL SYSCA0048551254075mg/L29.64 Terminal Island Water Reclamation PlantCA00538561015mg/L304 Oxnard Wastewater Treatment PlantCA0054097254075mg/L31.79 LATHAM WWTPCA0107417254075mg/L38.782 PALO ALTO REGIONAL WQCPCA0037834510mg/L392 SF - OCEANSIDE WPCPCA0037681n/an/an/amg/L439 BUENA SD, SHADOWRIDGE WRPCA0107395254075mg/L482 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SD WWTPCA00376481020mg/L53.85S Stockton Regional WW Control FacilityCA0079138n/an/an/amg/L555S Modesto Water Quality Control Facility (primary trtmt) CA0079103n/an/an/amg/L704 Donald C. Tillman WWRPCA00562271015mg/L808 IEUA Regional Plant No. 1CA8000409n/an/an/amg/L84.42 SF-SE WPCP, N-Point & BaysideCA00376641020mg/L85.44 San Jose Creek Water Reclamation PlantCA00539111015mg/L1002 EBDA COMMON OUTFALLCA00378691020mg/L107.82 EBMUD WPCPCA00377021020mg/L1202 SAN JOSE/SANTA CLARA WPCPCA0037842510mg/L1675S Sacramento Regional WWTPCA0077682n/an/an/amg/L1819 Point Loma WWTP & Ocean OutfallCA0107409254075mg/L2404 Joint Water Pollution Control Plant, CarsonCA00538131522.575mg/L4004 Hyperion WWTPCA0109991254075mg/L45079THREAT TO WATER QUALITYCOMPLEXPRETREATMENTPROGRAMF PROGRAREG MEASORDER #1A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R1-2011-00192A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2008-00711A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2008-00391A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2007-00581A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2007-00692A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2008-00142A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R3-2011-02112B Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2008-00061A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R1-2009-00332A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2008-00082A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R5-2007-00631A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2009-00751A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R5-2010-00732A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2010-00742A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2011-00031A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R8-2007-00121B Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R3-2010-00091A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2007-0132-011A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R8-2008-00052A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2012-00061A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2007-01131A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R5-2010-00961A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2007-00362A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2007-00071A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2009-00101A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2007-01341A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R3-2010-00111A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R8-2007-00051A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 3 NPDES Pe R5-2008-00271A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R8-2007-00061A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R3-2008-00161A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2010-00191A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2008-00791A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2012-00591A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R6V-2008-00041A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2008-00941A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2008-00111A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2009-00771A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2009-00761A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2008-00551A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2011-00071A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R2-2012-00171A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2007-00751A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2010-01651A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2009-00181A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R3-2010-00431A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2009-00391A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2009-00951A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R8-2007-00031A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R9-2010-00861A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2008-00771A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R4-2011-01973C Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2010-00022A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2012-00051A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2009-00741A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R9-2011-00161A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2007-00061A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2009-00612A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R3-2008-00081A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2010-00711A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2008-00291A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R9-2012-00121A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2009-00322A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2009-00621A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R9-2011-00191A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2012-00161A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2008-01541A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2008-0059-011A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R4-2011-01961A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 4 NPDES Pe R8-2009-00211A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2008-00071A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2009-00781A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2012-00041A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2010-00601A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R2-2009-00381A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R5-2010-01141A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 1 NPDES Pe R9-2009-00011A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2011-01511A Y - POTW has EPA approved pretreatment program NPDES 2 NPDES Pe R4-2010-0200NPDES # CA#MAJOR-M NPDES TYSTATUS STATUS DAT EFFECTIVE EXPIRATIONMOST RECENT AMENDMENT NUMBERMOST RECENT AMENCA0022756 Major MUN Active 7/12/2011 6/30/2011 6/29/2016CA0037532 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 10/1/2008 9/30/2013 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0053961 Major MUN Active 9/6/2009 8/29/2008 6/10/2013CA0082589 Major MUN Active 2/15/2011 6/21/2007 6/1/2012CA0078671 Major MUN Active 9/18/2008 8/11/2007 6/1/2012CA0038091 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 6/1/2008 5/30/2013 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0048127 Major MUN Active 1/31/2012 1/13/2012 1/13/2017CA0082660 Major MUN Active 3/15/2010 3/15/2008 12/31/2012 R5-2008-00876/12/2008CA0024449 Major MUN Active 11/16/2011 7/24/2009 7/24/2014CA0037788 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 4/1/2008 3/31/2013 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0079197 Major MUN Active 4/26/2011 6/22/2007 6/21/2012CA0054313 Major MUN Active 10/17/2009 7/24/2009 5/10/2014CA0079235 Major MUN Active 3/10/2011 5/27/2010 5/1/2015CA0037958 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 7/1/2010 6/30/2015 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0037810 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 3/1/2011 2/28/2016 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0105619 Major MUN Active 12/24/2009 2/2/2007 2/2/2012CA0049964 MajorActive 4/26/2010 3/18/2010 3/18/2015CA0079049 Major MUN Active 9/30/2011 12/14/2007 10/1/2012 R5-2010-00979/23/2010CA8000316 Major MUN Active 7/21/2008 7/18/2008 7/1/2013CA0038008 Major MUN Active 3/1/2012 3/1/2012 2/28/2017CA0079243 Major MUN Active 1/22/2008 11/3/2007 9/1/2012CA0079731 Major MUN Active 3/7/2011 9/23/2010 9/1/2015CA0079154 Major MUN Active 3/11/2010 6/23/2007 5/1/2012 R5-2011-00122/3/2011CA0038628 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 4/1/2007 3/31/2012 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0077950 Major MUN Active 5/11/2010 3/27/2009 2/1/2014CA0079260 Major MUN Active 1/6/2011 12/14/2007 10/1/2012 R5-2010-00071/28/2010CA0048143 Major MUN Active 6/2/2010 5/13/2010 5/13/2015CA8000383 Major MUN Active 2/16/2010 3/2/2007 3/2/2012CA0079219 Major MUN Active 5/6/2008 5/5/2008 3/13/2013CA0105295 Major MUN Active 9/20/2010 3/2/2007 3/2/2012 R8-2010-00349/16/2010CA0048216 Major MUN Active 4/22/2009 5/9/2008 5/9/2013CA0079081 Major MUN Active 5/17/2011 1/29/2010 1/1/2015CA0084573 Major MUN Active 8/13/2008 8/1/2008 6/1/2013CA0055531 Major MUN Active 3/13/2012 4/22/2012 2/10/2017CA0102822 MajorActive 10/4/2011 2/14/2008 2/14/2013CA0038130 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 1/1/2009 12/31/2013 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0053651 Major MUN Active 4/26/2012 3/6/2008 2/10/2013 R4-2008-020812/11/2008CA0053716 Major MUN Active 6/29/2011 7/24/2009 5/10/2014CA0053619 Major MUN Active 10/20/2009 7/24/2009 5/10/2014CA0077691 Major MUN Active 9/2/2010 6/14/2008 4/1/2013 R5-2010-00273/18/2010CA0037575 Major MUN Active 2/13/2012 4/1/2011 3/31/2016 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0037699 Major MUN Active 2/21/2012 4/1/2012 3/31/2017CA0037541 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 2/1/2008 1/31/2013 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0056014 Major MUN Active 5/1/2012 10/22/2010 8/10/2015 R4-2010-0165-A014/20/2012CA0038547 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 5/1/2009 4/30/2014 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0048194 Major MUN Active 1/13/2011 12/9/2010 12/9/2015CA0038024 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 6/1/2009 5/31/2014 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0081558 Major MUN Active 12/8/2009 10/8/2009 10/1/2014CA8000326 MajorActive 7/3/2008 11/30/2007 11/1/2012 R8-2008-00729/5/2008CA0107981 Major MUN Active 3/20/2012 10/28/2010 10/27/2015 Addendum No. 12/8/2012CA0079502 Major MUN Active 7/20/2008 8/1/2008 6/1/2013CA0053953 Major MUN Active 4/2/2012 1/27/2012 11/10/2016CA0078948 Major MUN Active 7/15/2010 3/19/2010 1/1/2015CA0037613 Major MUN Active 3/8/2012 3/1/2012 3/1/2017CA0054216 Major MUN Active 10/20/2009 7/24/2009 5/10/2014CA0107433 Major MUN Active 1/20/2011 3/3/2011 3/2/2016CA0038369 Major MUN Active 4/24/2012 4/1/2007 3/31/2012 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0037621 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 10/1/2009 9/30/2014 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0048551 Major MUN Active 5/29/2009 4/30/2008 4/30/2013CA0053856 Major MUN Active 12/27/2010 6/25/2010 4/10/2015CA0054097 Major MUN Active 4/20/2012 6/20/2008 4/10/2013 R4-2010-00483/4/2010CA0107417 Major MUN Active 4/20/2012 5/31/2012 5/31/2017CA0037834 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 6/1/2009 5/31/2014 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0037681 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 10/1/2009 9/30/2014 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0107395 Major MUN Active 3/20/2012 6/2/2011 6/1/2016 Addendum No. 13/14/2012CA0037648 Major MUN Active 2/28/2012 4/1/2012 3/31/2017CA0079138 Major MUN Active 5/25/2011 12/12/2008 10/1/2013CA0079103 Major MUN Active 1/5/2011 6/14/2008 4/1/2013 R5-2010-00403/18/2010CA0056227 Major MUN Active 1/30/2012 2/3/2012 11/10/2016CA8000409 Major MUN Active 1/20/2012 7/20/2009 1/2/2014 R8-2010-00083/18/2010CA0037664 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 4/1/2008 3/31/2013 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0053911 Major MUN Active 3/9/2010 7/24/2009 5/10/2014CA0037869 Major MUN Active 3/1/2012 3/1/2012 2/28/2017CA0037702 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 5/1/2010 4/30/2015 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0037842 Major MUN Active 2/10/2012 6/1/2009 5/31/2014 R2-2011-00093/9/2011CA0077682 Major MUN Active 2/2/2012 1/28/2011 12/1/2015 R5-2011-008312/1/2011CA0107409 Major MUN Active 7/23/2010 8/1/2010 7/31/2015CA0053813 Major MUN Active 9/20/2011 10/1/2011 8/10/2016CA0109991 Major MUN Active 5/18/2012 12/24/2010 12/23/2015NDMENT DATE----- From: Melissa Bouatene/DC/USEPA/US

To: Jan Matuszko/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/18/2012 02:18 PM

Subject: Fw: Data Request

Hi Jan

Meghan Camp from ERG processed your queries from a database that only her

could access and came up with the results below.

Her results are different from what I would've gotten from using the

loadi ng tool because the loading tool shows the number of permits for

major facilities that have some type of permit requirement for O&G

(includes permits with effluent limits and permits with only monitoring

requirements).

The results below represents the number of permits with effluent limits

for O&G (excludes permits that only require O&G monitoring and do not

have

limits).

Melissa Bouatene

ORISE Fellow

OW| OST| EAD

U.S. EPA HQ

202

- 566

- 1634

----- Forwarded by Melissa Bouatene/DC/USEPA/US on 06/18/201 2 02:11 PM

From: "Meghan Camp" < Meghan.Camp@erg.com >

To: Melissa Bouatene/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Carey Johnston/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/15/2012 04:43 PM

Subject: Re: Data Request

Melissa,

I ran your queries for our 2010 dataset and got the following results

Majors with O&G limits = 1,907

Majors with concentration

- based O&G limits = 1,833

Majors with concentration

- based O&G limits >= 200mg/L = 3 (TX0003191,

CT0001716, and PA0027715) For TX003191 and PA0027715 the average

concentration l imit is below 200 mg/L, but the daily max is above 200

mg/L. CT0001716 only has a daily max limit.

Please let me know if you have any questions or these results are

unexpected.

Meghan

Meghan Camp

Chemical Engineer

ERG

14555 Avion ParkwayChantilly, VA 20151

703

- 633

- 1684

meghan.camp@erg.com

>>> Melissa Bouatene <Bouatene.Melissa@epamail.epa.gov>

6/14/2012 11:12 AM >>>

Subject: regional pretreatment conf call notes

SendTo: Gomez

- Taylor.Maria@epamail.epa.gov

CopyTo: CN=Jan Matuszko/OU=DC/O=USEPA/C=US@EPA

From: CN=Robin Oshiro/OU=DC/O=USEPA/C=US

DeliveredDate: 06/14/2012 02:48:54 PM

Body: Bottom line: if approved w/ side by side testing, it's a huge

burden.

### Regional pretreatment coordinators conference call on D7575 implementation 6-14-12

Participants: Regions 1 -8, 10 (if Region 9 was on, I didn't hear them identify themselves)

Region 4

• Lots of POTW's lack the sophistication to do a side- by -side study, even with the guidance

document

• Have seen lots of O&G results that are > 200 mg/L

• They mostly have contract labs, who would have to know that they must do Method 1664

if the D7575 results are > 200 mg/L

Region 8

• Have seen < 200, but also way above 200 mg/L

• Direct dischargers are 35 mg/L but also some at 10 mg/L

• It would be a big burden to review side by side data for each discharger

• D7575 is not practical for pretreatment program

Region 3

• Most common pretreatment limit is 100 mg/L, but have seen 300-500 mg/L

Region 2

• Where the legal authority has been delegated (e.g., New York City), they would have to

change the regs if we approve the method

Other unspecified Regions

• Pretreatment is mostly 100 mg/L but some are way above this, and direct dischargers are

mos tly 15 -20 mg/L (you won't see POTWs discharging higher than this)

• Huge burden to review side by side data for each discharger, it can takes years for a

single ATP to be approved

• An option might be to just approve D7575 outright in the next MUR instead of requiring

side by side testingFrom: "Scott, Grace (DEQ)" <SCOTTG@michigan.g ov>

SendTo: Jan Pickrel/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,Maria Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

CopyTo: "Wong, Christine" <Christine.Wong@tetratech.com>,"Lam, Alvin

(DEQ)" <LAMA@michigan.gov>,Robin Oshiro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: RE: O&G

DeliveredDate: 06/14/2012 11:36:48 AM

The NPDES permit language on analytical methods usually requires “an

approved method or alternate method approved by the Department”. This

allows us to handle that outside the permit and avoid any modifications.

Indirect permits normally have simi lar language. It general enough that

we would not require user permit modifications for an approved ATP.

Grace

From: "Lam, Alvin (DEQ)" <LAMA@michigan.gov>

To: Jan Pickrel/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Scott, Grace (DEQ)" <SCOTTG@michigan.gov> , "Wong, Christine"

< Christine.Wong@tetratech.com >, Robin Oshiro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Maria

Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/14/2012 11:07 AM

Subject: RE: O&G

Jan,

Only EPA has the authority to approve ATP requests. The approval letter

will specify which pollutant(s) and NPDES permit(s) if the requester is a

permittee or which program(s) and location(s) if the requester is a

laboratory that the approval would apply. Thanks.

From: Jan Pickrel [mailto:Pickrel.Jan@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 10:58 AM

To: Maria Gomez

- Taylor

Cc: Scott, Grace (DEQ); Wong, Christine; Lam, Alvin(DEQ); Robin Oshiro

Subject: Re: O&G

Grace

­ Another question for implementation resources.

Let's say that someone [either MI or Region 5] approved an ATP. Would

each permit need to be modified to specifically incorporate this ATP for

the specific permittee?

Thanks!

- - Jan

~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~

From: Maria Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Scott, Grace (DEQ)" < SCOTTG@michigan.gov >

Cc: "Wong, Christine" < Christine.Wong@tetratech.com>, Jan

Pickrel/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Lam, Alvin(DEQ)" <LAMA@michigan.gov>, Robin

Oshiro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/14/2012 10:16 AM

Subject: Re: O&GGrace,

Thanks for your input. I will pass this on to our management.

Maria Gomez

- Taylor, Ph.D.

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue

N.W. Washington, D.C.20460

Phone: 202

- 566

- 1005

E- mail: gomez

- taylor.maria@epa.gov

From: "Scott, Grace (DEQ)" < SCOTTG@michigan.gov >

To: Maria Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Robin Oshiro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,

"Wong, Christine" <Christine.Wong@tetratech.com>, Jan

Pickrel/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Lam, Alvin(DEQ)" <LAMA@michigan.gov>

Date: 06/14/2012 10:12 AM

Subject: O&G

I talked to our ATP coo rdinator after our conference call. We do not have

any resources available to review the comparative analysis for the new

oil and grease method. Should EPA continue with adoption, we would either

not approve the alternative (or if Region V agreed perhaps we could

forward it to EPA for review). This would still create a burden on us for

tracking. It is indeterminate how much effort this would take, since it

is unpredictable how many requests would be received.

Grace L. Scott

Pretreatment Coordinator

Water Resources Division

Mi Dept of Environmental Quality (DEQ)

517

- 335

- 4107

Fax 517

- 373

- 2040

scottg@michigan.govSubject: shapiro + state conf call notes

SendTo: Gomez

- Taylor.Maria@epamail.epa.gov

From: CN=Robin Oshiro/OU=DC/O=USEPA/C=US

DeliveredDate : 06/14/2012 10:25:22 AM

### 13 June 2012, conf call State pretreatment

Alaska

• Narrative statement only, no numerical value

• Visual monitoring only, no lab analysis

• Up to individual facility to have own limits, e.g., if linked to restaurant

Utah

• Narrative only

• Generally 10 mg/L, use best professional judgement

• Pretreatment = indirect, 100 -500 mg/L

• They would refuse limited use ATP

Iowa

• Narrative only

• Indirect 50 mg/L average, generally would not approve greater than this

West Virginia (Nate)

• Indirect only, e.g., vehicle wash facility

• If applied, need maintenance narrative or monitor for O&G, usually 50 mg/L

• For direct, narrative only

Florida

• Direct 5 mg/L, plus narrative, no visible (undissolved) oil

• Indirect 50- 400 mg/L [2 separate limits, total & petroleum]

Missouri (Walter)

• Direct 10 mg/L

• Indirect 100-300 mg/L

Tennessee

• Indirect only – local limits 100 -300 mg/L

Minnesota

• Indirect up to POTW based primarily on operational use, 100-300 mg/L

Michigan

• Direct

– narrat ive only, no visible sheen, 10-15 mg/L based on best professional

judgement

• Indirect – 50-700 mg/L in municipalities, some divided into polar/nonpolar, normal is

100 mg/L

• "We talked to our ATP coordinator. W e do not have any resources available to review the

comparative analysis for the new oil and grease method. Should EPA continue with

adoption, we would either not approve the alternative (or if Region V agreed perhaps we

could forward it to EPA for review). This would still create a burden on us for tracking.

It is indeterminate how much effort this would take, sinc e it is unpredictable how many

requests would be received."----- Subject: Fw: Re: Questions about oil and grease

From: CN=Maria Gomez

- Taylor/OU=DC/O=USEPA/C=US

SendTo: CN=Robin Oshiro/OU=DC/O=USEPA/C=US@EPA

DeliveredDate: 06/12/2012 07:03:27 AM

FYI. Jan asked about you attending/listening in.

Maria Gomez

- Taylor, Ph.D.

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue

N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460

Phone: 202

- 566

- 1005

E- mail: gomez

- taylor.maria@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Maria Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US on 06/12/2012 07:02AM

To: Maria Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

From: Jan Pickrel/DC/USEPA/US

Date: 06/11/2012 04:36PM

Cc: "Lee, I

- Hsin" < I

- Hsin.Lee@tetratech.com >,

christine.wong@tetratech.com, Robin Danesi/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: Re: Questions about oil and grease

OK, Great.

Right now, I think you have the only agenda item!

We'll make sure to send you the meeting scheduler.

We haven't formally set up a room yet, but I'll let you know if we do.

- - Jan

~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~

Jan Pickrel

Water Permits Division, Industrial Branch

US Environmental Protection Agency

phone: (202) 564

- 7904.

fax: (202) 564

- 6431.

pickrel.jan@epa.gov

~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~

From: Maria Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US

To: Jan Pickrel/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/11/2012 04:21 PM

Subject: Re: Questions about oil and grease

Jan Matuszko a sked me to participate if possible in the next pretreatment

coordinators calls June 13 and 14 (she is not available). Let me know if

that is possible or whether you already have a full agenda. What I would

like to do is briefly explain the new method being considered for oil and

grease and what we said in the NODA, and specifically ask input on:

(1) Do they have information on the typical concentration range for oil

and grease permits, and what would be the b reakdown of permits above 200

mg/L and below that number.(2) What implementation problems do they anticipate if EPA were to

approve the ASTM method? What would be the State and Regional burden if

we go with approval with side

- by

- side data required?

M aria Gomez

- Taylor, Ph.D.

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue

N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460

Phone: 202

- 566

- 1005

E- mail: gomez

- taylor.maria@epa.gov

Jan Pickrel

--- 06/11/2012 03:44:14 PM

--- what I have are that 9,800 of

those 22,800 SIUs are subject to PSES and PSNS. I do n't have a breakou

From: Jan Pickrel/DC/USEPA/US

To: Maria Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/11/2012 03:44 PM

Subject: Re: Questions about oil and grease

what I have are that 9,800 of those 22,800 SIUs are subject to PSES and

PSNS.

I don't have a breakout per which ELG tho

We hope to get that type of detail if/when the NPDES Electronic Reporting

rule ever comes to fruition.

- - Jan

~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~

Jan Pickrel

Water Permits Division, Industrial Branch

US Environmental Protection Agency

phone: (202) 564

- 7904.

fax: (202) 564

- 6431.

pickrel.jan@epa.gov

~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~

From: Maria Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US

To: Jan Pickrel/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/11/2012 01:52 PM

Subject: Re: Questions about oil and grease

Hi Jan,

Forgot to add that it will be helpful if you can get numbers of those

SIUs that are subject to PSES and PSNS. Thanks.

Maria Gomez

- Taylor, Ph.D.

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue

N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460

Phone: 202

- 566

- 1005

E- mail: gomez

- taylor.maria@epa.govJan Pickrel

-- - 06/11/2012 12:41:55 PM

--- Hello

- We have a monthly call

with the EPA Regional Pretreatment Coordinators, and a bimonthly cal

From: Jan Pickrel/DC/USEPA/US

To: Maria Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/11/2012 12:41 PM

Subject: Re: Questions about oil and grease

Hello

­ We have a monthly call with the EPA Regional Pretreatment Coordinators,

and a bimonthly call with the State Pretreatment Coordinators.

Both occur this week

- June 13 and June 14

- at 2 pm. These are the 2nd

Wednesday and 2nd Thursday of the month.

We can be somewhat flexible about the times, and in fact it's not all

that unusual for us to move it to 3 pm periodically.

Is this week too soon for Jan M?

Regarding the number of indirect dischargers...

W e can easily estimate the number of SIGNIFICANT industrial users*:

22,000 However, probably the vast majority of IUs that are regulated for

oil and grease are not "significant" with the aspects of federal

permitting requirements. Example, restaurants / food service

establishments. We have no good estimation of the number of those IUs.

Most of these, however, don't take regular samples for compliance with a

numeric limitation but by implementing BMPs.

*Definition of Significant Industrial Users includes those subject to

effluent guidelines and standards [PSES and PSNS], process flows > 25,000

gpd, process flows > 5% of the organic or dry weather capacity of the

receiving POTW [which, for a 5 MGD POTW would be 25,000 gpd.] We keep

tabs on the number of those that are subject to PSES and PSNS, if that

number would help you, and which ELGs contain oil and grease limits.

- - - Jan

~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~

Jan Pickrel

Water Permits Division, Industrial Branch

US Environmental Protection Agency

phone: (202) 564

- 7904.

fax: (202) 564

- 6431.

pickrel.jan@epa.gov

~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~*^*~

Maria Gomez

- Taylor--- 06/11/2012 11:59:16 AM

--- Hi Jan, I am following up

on my phone message last week.

From: Maria Gomez

- Taylor/DC/USEPA/US

To: Jan Pickrel/DC/USEPA/US@ EPA

Date: 06/11/2012 11:59 AM

Subject: Questions about oil and grease

Hi Jan,I am following up on my phone message last week.

We are looking at a new analytical method for oil and grease and need

more concrete info on oil and grease requirements for i ndirect

dischargers. We are using Carey's tool to access and synthesize

information reported by major permitted dischargers.

What we need to know about indirect dischargers is: 1) approximately, how

many indirect dischargers?, 2) of those, do you have any idea of how many

may have oil and grease limits? and 3) of those with limits, how many or

what percent have oil and grease limits in excess of 200 mg/L?

The reason for the 200 mg/L question is that the new method measures up

to 200 mg/L while the existing method measures up to 1,000 mg/L so this

information will be useful in determining the universe of permits that

could use the new method, if approved.

We need this information for an upcoming briefing with Mike Shapiro. Is

this something you can provide?

By the way, Jan Matuszko also wants to have some time at the next monthly

meeting with pre

- treatment coordinators to discuss with them our next

steps with this method and to ask about the potential burden. Or is there

any other input mechanism that you would recommend.

Thanks in advance.

Maria Gomez

- Taylor, Ph.D.

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue

N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460

Phone: 202

- 566

- 1005

E- mail: gomez

- taylor.maria@epa.gov