Facility _Information facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_ty pe

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 1046 9417 Interstate Power and Light Interstate Power and Light

legal owner200 First Street SE Cedar Rapids

IA 52401

Page 1Facility _Information plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip Dubuque 920 Kerper Road Dubuque IA 52004-0769 920 Kerper Road

Dubuque IA 52004-0769

Page 2Facility _Information RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas No TRUE TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE

Page 3Facility _Information ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE TRUE Excess Emission Report, Quarterly Report, Semi-annual monitoring report, Annual Compliance certification No Facility : DubuqueThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 4Facility _Information Facility : DubuqueThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 5Facility _Information Facility : DubuqueThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 6Facility _Information Facility : DubuqueThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 7Facility _Information Facility : DubuqueThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 8Facility _Information Facility : DubuqueThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 9Facility _Information Facility : DubuqueThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 10Facility _Information Facility : DubuqueThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 11Facility _Information Facility : DubuqueThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 12Facility _Information Facility : DubuqueThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 13Facility _Information Facility : DubuqueThrough this electronic submittal, Interstate Power and Light Company (“IPL”) responds to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“U.S. EPA”) mercury and hazardous air pollutant information collection request (“ICR”), which was issued pursuant to section 114 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). IPL is also providing certain confidential business information under a separate cover letter. IPL conducted a diligent review of records and a diligent interviewing process of employees who m ay have knowledge of the information requested in the subject ICR. IPL is responding to the specific data requests within the subject ICR to the best of its ability , and based upon its reasonable interpretation and understanding of the specific data requests. Additionally , IPL has reviewed and, where appropriate, used EPA’s answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), available at “Electrical Utilities MACT Information Collection Request” W eb site in the FAQ section, to guide its responses to ICR. The

Page 14facility _contacts facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 1046 1 Manager Environmental Services Bradley G. Pincombe 6084584928 bradley pincombe@alliantenergy .com TRUE 1046 2 Enviornm ental Specialist Orvella Shipm an

6417913203 orvellashipm an@alliantenergy .com FALSE

Page 15facility _coal_utilized facility _id coal_ty pe percentage_mass percentage_btu

sy nfuel_ty pe

coal_note 1046 subbituminous 100 100

Page 16facility _oil_utilized facility _id oil_ty pe percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_type 1046 No.2 Fuel Oil (distillate) 100 100

Page 17facility _other_materials facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain 1046 Boiler cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 300000 Permitted to burn up to 300,000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1046 Ion exchange resin

TRUE FALSE 100 Permitted to burn 100 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1046 Oil/W ater separator sludge

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1046 Oily

water TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1046 Turbine cleaning waste

TRUE FALSE 8000 Permitted to burn up to 8000 Gallons every 7 years No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1046 Used Oil TRUE FALSE 6000 Permitted to burn 6000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1046 Used oil adsorbents

TRUE FALSE 1000 Permitted to burn 1000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. 1046 Wa ter based parts washer

TRUE FALSE 10000 Permitted to burn 10,000 Gallons/Year No CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 18facility _other_materials rcra_explain CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive. CAA Section 129 requirements are cost prohibitive.

Page 19boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_ty pe boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuel heat_input ma x_heat_input MW e_capacity 1046 1 Wa ll firing - front firing Dry Bottom coal 528.3 605.8 37.6 1046 5 Wa ll firing - front firing Dry Bottom coal 258.3 337.3 29.2

Page 20boiler_information

MW e_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 35.4 85.5 83 850 850 1.21 1.22 FALSE 1.23 27.4 86.3 81 600 600 1.25 1.26 FALSE 1.27

Page 21boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 1.24 6061 42.27 N FALSE FALSE 1.28 6383 55.73 N FALSE

Page 22boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives No Yes No No Yes No

Page 23boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_ty pe fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1046 1 coal - subbituminous 2007 99.13 1046 1 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.39 1046 1 coal - subbituminous 2009 93.5 1046 1 natural gas 2007 0.86 1046 1 natural gas 2008 0.61 1046 1 natural gas 2009 6.5 1046 1 oil - distillate 2007 0.01 1046 5 coal - bituminous 2007 98.619 1046 5 coal - subbituminous 2008 99.15 1046 5 coal - subbituminous 2009 97.96 1046 5 natural gas 2007 1.376 1046 5 natural gas 2008 0.84 1046 5 natural gas 2009 1.96 1046 5 oil - distillate 2007 0.005 1046 5 oil - distillate 2008 0.01 1046 5 oil - distillate 2009 0.08

Page 24boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_ty pe NOx_other NOx_online

Page 25boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_ty pe SO2_other SO2_online 1046 1 Low Sulfur Coal 6/1/2000 1046 5 Low Sulfur Coal 6/1/2000

Page 26boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online

Page 27facility _units facility _id unit_id 1046 1 1046 5

Page 28unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 1046 1 1 1046 5 5

Page 29facility _controls facility _id control_id control_group control_ty pe

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 1046 ESP-1 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 1/1/1974 1046 ESP-5 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/o flue gas conditioning FALSE 8/1/1974

Page 30facility _controls reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive

Page 31facility _sampling_ports facility _id sampling_port_id 1046 ESP Inlet - 5 1046 Stack-1 1046 Stack-CS 5/6

Page 32facility _stacks facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 1046 Unit 1 Stack 158 8.9375 1046 Unit CS 5/6 Stack 158 9

Page 33configurations

facility _id configuration_id 1046 Unit 1 1046 Unit 5

Page 34configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_ty pe port_near 1046 Unit 1 1 1 Unit 1046 Unit 1 ESP-1 2 PM control 1046 Unit 1 Stack-1 3 Sam pling Port next 1046 Unit 1 Unit 1 Stack 4 Stack 1046 Unit 5 5 1 Unit 1046 Unit 5 ESP Inlet - 5 2 Sam pling Port next 1046 Unit 5 ESP-5 3 PM control 1046 Unit 5 Stack-CS 5/6 4 Sam pling Port next 1046 Unit 5 Unit CS 5/6 Stack 5 Stack

Page 35configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_ty pe_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 1046 Unit 1 PM (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

211 pound per hour (lb/hr) 0.6 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1046 Unit 1 PM10 (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

211 pound per hour (lb/hr) 0.6 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1046 Unit 1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

765 pound per hour (lb/hr)

3 hours 6 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1046 Unit 5 PM (Filterable) State - Permit to Contruct

155 pound per hour (lb/hr) 0.6 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1046 Unit 5 PM10 (Filterable) State - State Operating Permit

155 pound per hour (lb/hr) 0.6 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) 1046 Unit 5 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) State - State Operating Permit

875 pound per hour (lb/hr)

3 hours 6 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

Page 36configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_details

test_method

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) See Note #1.01 for Emission Limit 1/ See Note #1.02 for Emission Limit 2 No CAM Plan CAM Plan pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) See Note #1.03 for Emission Limit 1/ See Note #1.04 for Emission Limit 2 No CAM Plan CAM Plan 3 hours See Note #1.05 for Emission Limit 1/ See Note #1.06 for Emission Limit 2 See Note #1.07 for 3rd Emission Limit. No CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) See Note #1.01 for Emission Limit 1/ See Note #1.02 for Emission Limit 2. No CAM Plan. Monitor and record annual PM emissions for 10 years CAM Plan. Monitor and record annual PM emissions for 10 years pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) See Note #1.03 for Emission Limit 1/ See Note #1.04 for Emission Limit 2 No CAM Plan. Monitor and record annual PM10 emissions for 10 years CAM Plan. Monitor and record annual PM10 emissions for 10 years 3 hours See Note #1.05 for Emission Limit 1/ See Note #1.06 for Emission Limit 2See Note #1.07 the the 3rd Limit SO2 No CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. Monitor annual SO2 emissions. CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. Monitor annual SO2 emissions.

Page 37configuration_pollutants1

req_reporting CAM Plan CAM Plan CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. CAM Plan. Report annual PM emissions within 60 days after each end of year ( PM operating limit for 5 years: 84.39 tpy) CAM Plan. Report annual PM10 emissions within 60 days after each end of year ( PM10 operating limit for 5 years: 74.39 tpy) CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. Report SO2 annual emissions 60 within days after the end of each year ( operating limit for 5 year SO2=1058.79 tpy)

Page 38configuration_pollutants1

CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. CAM Plan. Report annual PM emissions within 60 days after each end of year ( PM operating limit for 5 years: 84.39 tpy) CAM Plan. Report annual PM10 emissions within 60 days after each end of year ( PM10 operating limit for 5 years: 74.39 tpy) CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. Report SO2 annual emissions 60 within days after the end of each year ( operating limit for 5 year SO2=1058.79 tpy)

Page 39configuration_pollutants1

CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. Report SO2 annual emissions 60 within days after the end of each year ( operating limit for 5 year SO2=1058.79 tpy)

Page 40configuration_pollutants1

CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. Report SO2 annual emissions 60 within days after the end of each year ( operating limit for 5 year SO2=1058.79 tpy)

Page 41configuration_pollutants1

CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. Report SO2 annual emissions 60 within days after the end of each year ( operating limit for 5 year SO2=1058.79 tpy)

Page 42configuration_pollutants1

CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. Report SO2 annual emissions 60 within days after the end of each year ( operating limit for 5 year SO2=1058.79 tpy)

Page 43configuration_pollutants1

CEM 40 CFR 75, Compliance with the Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) rolling 3-hour average emission limit of this permit shall be continuously demonstrated by

the owner/operator through the use of a CEMS. Therefore, a CEMS shall be installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated for measuring sulfur dioxide emissions in units of the standards (lbs/hr) discharged to the atmosphere from this unit and the output of the system shall be recorded. The system shall be designed to meet the QA requirements of 40 CFR Part 75. Report SO2 annual emissions 60 within days after the end of each year ( operating limit for 5 year SO2=1058.79 tpy)

Page 44control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_title project_ty pe vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone

Page 45control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive

Page 46control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units

Page 47control_technologies feed_rate_units

Page 48control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_ty pe

Page 49control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e

Page 50control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year

Page 51control_costs

CBI

Page 52mi sc_controls

facility _id mi sc_control_id

control_description

Page 53mi sc_control_configurations

facility _id mi sc_control_id

configuration_id

Page 54fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_ty pe state_country other_country

county 1046 200901-Coal 1/1/2009 21055.56 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1046 200902-Coal 2/1/2009 12136.25 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1046 200905-Coal 5/1/2009 3946.54 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1046 200906-Coal 6/1/2009 8514.52 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1046 200907-Coal 7/1/2009 7797.65 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1046 200908-Coal 8/1/2009 11973.11 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1046 200909-Coal 9/1/2009 12971.63 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1046 200910-Coal

10/1/2009 9444.77 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY 1046 200911-Coal

11/1/2009 1014.94 short tons (2000 lbs) coal WY

Page 55fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method

Trucks Trucks Barge Barge Barge Barge Barge Barge Barge

Page 56fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 1046 200901-Coal

Unit 1 1046 200901-Coal

Unit 5 1046 200902-Coal

Unit 1 1046 200902-Coal

Unit 5 1046 200905-Coal

Unit 1 1046 200905-Coal

Unit 5 1046 200906-Coal

Unit 1 1046 200906-Coal

Unit 5 1046 200907-Coal

Unit 1 1046 200907-Coal

Unit 5 1046 200908-Coal

Unit 1 1046 200908-Coal

Unit 5 1046 200909-Coal

Unit 1 1046 200909-Coal

Unit 5 1046 200910-Coal

Unit 1 1046 200910-Coal

Unit 5 1046 200911-Coal

Unit 1 1046 200911-Coal

Unit 5

Page 57fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units

Page 58fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_ty pe

supplier_name

supplier_address

Page 59fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies

Page 60fuel_shipment_samples analysis_copies

Page 61fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL

Page 62test_reports

facility _id report_id report_ty pe other_type report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 1046 DBQ1-CO-20070801

compliance Carbon Monoxide testing at Unit 1 Stack 8/1/2007 8/1/2007 No No 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20060411

compliance Mercury testing at unit 1 Stack 4/11/2006 4/11/2006 No No 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

other Diagnostic Diagnostic Mercury testing at unit 1 Stack 5/2/2007 5/2/2007 No No 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051026

other Diagnostic Particulate testing at Unit 1 Stack ######## ######## No No 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051206

compliance Particulate testing at Unit 1 Stack 12/6/2005 12/6/2005 No No 1046 DBQ5-CO-20070731

other Diagnostic Carbon Monoxide testing at unit 5 ESP Inlet duct 7/31/2007 7/31/2007 No No 1046 DBQ5-Hg-20060411

compliance Unit 5 Mercury testing performed on the common stack of units 5&6 (Stack-CS 5/6), while unit 6 was off-line 4/11/2006 4/11/2006 No No 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051025

other Diagnostic Unit 5 Particulate testing performed at the common stack of units 5 and 6 (Stack-CS5/6), while unit 6 was off-line ######## ######## No No 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051028

other Diagnostic Unit 5 Particulate testing performed at the common stack of units 5 and 6 (Stack-CS5/6) while unit 6 was off-line ######## ######## No No 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051206

compliance Unit 5 Particulate testing performed at the common stack of units 5 and 6 (Stack - CS 5/6), while unit 6 was off-line 12/6/2005 12/6/2005 No No

Page 63test_reports

deviation_reports No No No No No No No No No No

Page 64test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 1046 DBQ1-CO-20070801

Unit 1 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20060411

Unit 1 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

Unit 1 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051026

Unit 1 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051206

Unit 1 1046 DBQ5-CO-20070731

Unit 5 1046 DBQ5-Hg-20060411

Unit 5 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051025

Unit 5 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051028

Unit 5 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051206

Unit 5

Page 65test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 1046 DBQ1-CO-20070801

Subbitum inous 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20060411

Subbitum inous 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

Subbitum inous 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051026

Subbitum inous 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051206

Subbitum inous 1046 DBQ5-CO-20070731

Subbitum inous 1046 DBQ5-Hg-20060411

Subbitum inous 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051025

Subbitum inous 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051028

Subbitum inous 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051206

Subbitum inous

Page 66test_report_fuel_ty pes

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_ty pe percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_type 1046 DBQ1-CO-20070801

Subbitum inous

coal - bituminous 100 100 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20060411

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051026

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051206

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1046 DBQ5-CO-20070731

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1046 DBQ5-Hg-20060411

Subbitum inous

coal - bituminous 100 100 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051025

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051028

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051206

Subbitum inous

coal - subbituminous

100 100

Page 67cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description

Page 68cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e

Page 69test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_by pass_percent

testing_by pass_percent 1046 DBQ1-CO-20070801

Stack-1 No No 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20060411

Stack-1 No No 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

Stack-1 No No 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051026

Stack-1 No No 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051206

Stack-1 No No 1046 DBQ5-CO-20070731

ESP Inlet - 5

No No 1046 DBQ5-Hg-20060411

Stack-CS 5/6

No No 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051025

Stack-CS 5/6

No No 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051028

Stack-CS 5/6

No No 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051206

Stack-CS 5/6

No No

Page 70test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 71sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 1046 DBQ1-CO-20070801

Stack-1 average 8/1/2007 8/1/2007 39.3 7.2 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20060411

Stack-1 average 4/11/2006 4/11/2006 38 8.3 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

Stack-1 average 5/2/2007 5/2/2007 28 10.9 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051026

Stack-1 average ######## ######## 40 6.5 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051206

Stack-1 average 12/6/2005 12/6/2005 40.7 3.2 1046 DBQ5-CO-20070731

ESP Inlet - 5

average 7/31/2007 7/31/2007 19.5 10.4 1046 DBQ5-Hg-20060411

Stack-CS 5/6

average 4/11/2006 4/11/2006 18.7 10.8 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051025

Stack-CS 5/6

average ######## ######## 20.6 6.2 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051028

Stack-CS 5/6

average ######## ######## 19.7 7.3 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051206

Stack-CS 5/6

average 12/6/2005 12/6/2005 20.3 7.4

Page 72sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature 123223 dscfm 68 1 5.4 13.5 1.08 125143 dscfm 68 1 6.3 12.4 1.11 96982 dscfm 68 1 6.8 12.8 1.12 130887 dscfm 68 1 6.3 12.5 1.09 130693 dscfm 68 1 6.3 12.5 1.13 60199 dscfm 68 1 5.7 13.1 1.14 59027 dscfm 68 1 6.4 12.2 1.17 80676 dscfm 68 1 6 12.5 1.15 90762 dscfm 68 1 6 12.5 1.16 69665 dscfm 68 1 6 13 1.18

Page 73sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value 0.98 10 Subbitum inous 39.3 43927 13.37 11880 0.98 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous 38 45047 6.14 12694 0.98 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous 28 43733 6 12008 0.98 201A/202 Subbitum inous 40 6.04 13505 0.98 201A/202 Subbitum inous 40.7 43040 12.61 12424 0.96 10 Subbitum inous 19.5 26500 7.57 12264 0.98 ASTM D6784-02 Subbitum inous 18.7 27353 7.55 12014 0.98 201A/202 Subbitum inous 20.6 7.6 13307 1 201A/202 Subbitum inous 19.7 7.42 12063 0.98 201A/202 Subbitum inous 20.3 27387 7.54 11882

Page 74sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur 0.4 0.38 0.52 0.67 0.5 0.47 0.45 0.63 0.52 0.46

Page 75sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 1046 DBQ5-Hg-20060411

Stack-CS 5/6

average Total Mercury (Hgt) 0.000488 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1046 DBQ5-Hg-20060411

Stack-CS 5/6

average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 0.000284 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1046 DBQ5-Hg-20060411

Stack-CS 5/6

average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 0.000204 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1046 DBQ5-Hg-20060411

Stack-CS 5/6

average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 3.33E-07 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051206

Stack-CS 5/6

average PM (Filterable) 0.0272 FALSE 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051206

Stack-CS 5/6

average PM (Condensable) 0.0328 FALSE 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051206

Stack-CS 5/6

average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0189 FALSE 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051028

Stack-CS 5/6

average PM (Filterable) 0.0145 FALSE 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051028

Stack-CS 5/6

average PM (Condensable) 0.018 FALSE 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051028

Stack-CS 5/6

average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0109 FALSE 1046 DBQ1-CO-20070801

Stack-1 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 204.5 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051026

Stack-1 average PM (Filterable) 0.078 FALSE 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051026

Stack-1 average PM (Condensable) 0.0101 FALSE 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051026

Stack-1 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0507 FALSE 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20060411

Stack-1 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 0.000257 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20060411

Stack-1 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 0.00016 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20060411

Stack-1 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 0.000096 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20060411

Stack-1 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 4.56E-07 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

Stack-1 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 4.19 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

Stack-1 average Elem ental Mercury (Hg0) 2.73 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

Stack-1 average Oxidized Mercury (Hg++) 1.39 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

Stack-1 average Particulate-bound Mercury (Hgp) 0.066 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051206

Stack-1 average PM (Filterable) 0.0283 FALSE 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051206

Stack-1 average PM (Condensable) 0.0086 FALSE 1046 DBQ1-PM-20051206

Stack-1 average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0206 FALSE 1046 DBQ5-CO-20070731

ESP Inlet - 5

average Carbon Monoxide (CO) 353.6 parts per million by volum e (dry) (ppmvd) FALSE 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051025

Stack-CS 5/6

average PM (Filterable) 0.0515 FALSE 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051025

Stack-CS 5/6

average PM (Condensable) 0.0201 FALSE 1046 DBQ5-PM-20051025

Stack-CS 5/6

average PM10 (Filterable) 0.0243 FALSE

Page 76sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment 0.0009 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 3.8E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00052 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.1E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00038 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.6E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 3.71E-07 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 1.59E-09 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 16.215 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0526 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0272 grains/dscf) 19.613 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0636 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0328 grains/dscf) 11.295 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0367 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0189 grains/dscf) 11.219 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.029 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0145 grains/dscf) 14.042 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0363 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.018 grains/dscf) 8.428 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0218 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0109 grains/dscf) 109.7 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.199 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 87.468 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.1562 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0078 grains/dscf) 11.366 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0203 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0101 grains/dscf) 56.879 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.1016 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0507 grains/dscf) 0.001 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.9E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00063 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.3E-06 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.00037 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 7E-07 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 1.77E-06 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 3.43E-09 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 0.0015 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 4.072 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 0.00099 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 2.652 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 0.00051 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 1.357 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 0.000024 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE 0.064 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE 31.643 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0558 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0283 grains/dscf) 9.683 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.017 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0086 grains/dscf) 23.055 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0406 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0206 grains/dscf) 92.7 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.353 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE 37.094 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.1006 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0515 grains/dscf) 13.412 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0391 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0201 grains/dscf) 17.035 pound per hour (lb/hr)

FALSE 0.0474 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) FALSE Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0243 grains/dscf)

Page 77sampling_run_pollutants1 run_pollutant_comment
Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0272 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0328 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0189 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0145 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.018 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0109 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0078 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0101 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0507 grains/dscf)

Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0283 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0086 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0206 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0515 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0201 grains/dscf) Ty pical measurement units for this PM concentration is in grains per dry standard cubic feet (0.0243 grains/dscf)

Page 78sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20060411

Stack-1 average Mercury (Hg) 0.03 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

Stack-1 average Chloride (Cl) 0.02 percent (dry) (%) FALSE 1046 DBQ1-Hg-20070502

Stack-1 average Mercury (Hg) 0.087 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE 1046 DBQ5-Hg-20060411

Stack-CS 5/6

average Mercury

(Hg) 0.06 mi crogram per gram (dry) (mg/g) FALSE

Page 79sampling_run_fuel fuel_conc_MDL

Page 80