1



## Recommendations for Providers Counseling Male Patients and Parents Regarding Male Circumcision and the

Prevention of HIV Infection , STIs, and other Health Outcomes

I ntroduction:

These recommendations are intended to assist health care providers in the United States who are counseling men and parents of male infants in decision making about male circumcision conducted by health care providers (i.e. medically performed) as it relate s to the prevention of h uman i mmunodeficiency v irus (HIV) infection, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and other health outcomes

. Such decision making is made in the context of not only health considerations, but also other social, cultural, ethical

, and religious factors. Although data ha ve been accumulating about infant male circumcision for many years, clinical trials conducted in Africa between 2005

- 2010 have demonstrated safety and significant efficacy of voluntary adult male circumcision perfor med by clinicians for reducing the risk of acquisition of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by a male during penile

- vaginal sex (“heterosexual sex”). Three randomized clinical trials showed that adult male circumcision reduced HIV infection risk by 50

- 60 % over time 1

- 4

. These trials also found that medically performed adult circumcision reduced the risk of men acquiring two common sexually transmitted infections (STIs)

, herpes simplex virus type

- 2 ( HSV

- 2 ) 5

, 6 and type s of human papilloma virus ( HPV ) 6
, 7 that can cause penile and other anogenital cancers, by 30 %

. Since the release of these trial data, various organizations have upda ted their recommendations about adult male 8 and infant male circumcision 9

, 10

. Much of the data related to HIV and STI prevention are from rand omized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted among men in sub

- Saharan Africa in regions w ith high rates of heterosexually acquired HIV infection . In the United States, the prevalence of HIV and lifetime risk of HIV infection are generally much lower than that i n sub

- Saharan Africa . Also, m ost new HIV infections in the United States are attributed to male

- male sex, a population for whom male circumcision has not been proven to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition. While such factors limit the impact of medically pe rformed male circumcision in reducing the overall HIV epidemic in the U.S., there is epidemiologic data to suggest that some subpopulations in the U.S. are likely to benefit. O ne in every ten estimated new HIV infections in the United States are attributed to female

- to

- male sexual transmission 11 . In addition, African

- American and Hispanic men have higher risk of HIV infection and lower male circumcision rates than men of other race/ethnicities. A lthough similar randomized clinical trials have not been conducted in the United States , based on evidence from the Afri can trials, u ncircumcised heterosexual men living in areas with high HIV prevalence are likely to experience the most public health risk

- reduction benefit from elective male circumcision.

Methods:

A CDC consultation was held in April 2007 to obtain input on the potential role of male circumcision in preventing transmission of HIV in the U nited States . A summary of the2

consultation , including a list of the participants ha s been previously published 12 and helped define key issues for inclusion in this document

.

The se recommendations are based on an evaluation of available information on the health risks and benefits associated with high

- quality, medically pe r formed male circumcision and were developed to pertain to men and male newborn s in the United States 13

. In these recommendation s , t he preventive benefits of male circumcision are generally expressed as relative

- risk reductions (e.g., a 50% reduction from a 2% risk of an STI to a 1% risk), whereas any associated harm is expressed as an absolute risk (e.g., a 2

- 4% risk of adverse events). Appropriate denominators are not available in many cases to establish an absolute risk for HIV and other STIs in higher

- ris k populations, e.g., heterosexual males at increased risk for infection.

Recommendations :

1. Consideration of f

actors associated with decision making

Health benefits and risks of elective neonatal, adolescent, or adult medically performed male circumcision should be considered in consultation with medical providers while taking into account factors associated with decision

- making around male circumcision including religion, societal norms and social customs, hygiene, aesthetic preference, and ethical consid erations.

2. Counseling sexually active adolescent and adult males regardless of circumcision status

All sexually active adolescent and adult males should continue to use other proven HIV and STI risk

- reduction strategies such as reducing the number of part ners, and correct and consistent use of male latex condoms, and HIV preexposure or postexposure prophylaxis among others 1

.

3

. Counseling uncircumcised sexually active adolescent and adult males

Prior to counseling uncircumcised sexually active adolescen t and adult males about medically performed male circumcision, their HIV risk behaviors, HIV infection status, and the gender of their sexual partner should be assessed 14 . The results of these assessments will inform the discussion with men about the risks and benefits of male circumcision.

3 A

. Counseling uncircumcised h eterosexually and bisexually active adolescent and adult males (i.e., men who have sex with women)

3 A

- 1. A n a ssessment of the patient’s risk of acquiring HIV through heterosexual sex should be conducted :

o Providers should review the patient’s HIV risk behavior.

o Providers should assess condom use practices, consisten cy of use, and barriers to

use

.

1 Information about HIV and STD prevention strategies other than medically performed male circumcision can be found at http://wwwdev.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/prevention.html and http://www.cdc.gov/std/prevention/default.htm

.3

o Heterosexually and bisexually active adolescent and adult males should be informed that men at high risk of HIV exposure during heterosexual sex include HIV

- uninfected men in sexual relationships with :

 An HIV

- infected wom a n (i.e., in an HIV discordant couple) ;

 One or more women who are at high risk for HIV (this includes commercial sex workers, injection drug users, and women in defined geographic location s with a prevalence of HIV > 1.0%);

 Multiple female partners.

3 A

- 2

. All u ncircumcised adolescent and adult males who engage in heterosexual sex should be informed about the significant, but partial, efficacy of male circumcision in reducing the risk of acquiring HIV and some STIs through heterosexual sex , as well as the po tential harms of male circumcision

.

o Men and male adolescents being counseled about m ale circumcision should be told that (see Box 1 ) :

 Male circumcision reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of acquiring HIV and some STI

s during penile

- vaginal sex. In clinical trials, medically performed m ale circumcision was associated with reduced number of new herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV

- 2) infections and reduced number of oncogenic types of human papilloma virus (HPV) among circumcised men.

 Male circumcision has not been shown to reduce the risk of HIV or STI s during oral or anal sex

.

 Male circumcision has not been shown to reduce the risk of HIV transmission to female partners.

 After circumcision, men should not have sex until their health care provider has documented wound healing.

o Uncircumcised, HIV

- uninfected men and male adolescents at increased risk for HIV acquisition through heterosexual sex should be counseled about the risk and benefits of male circumcision (See Box 1 ). When a decision is made to undergo male circumcision, a referral for surgical consultation and access to high

- quality male circumcision surgical services should be provided

.

3B

. Counseling m en who have sex with men (exclusively )

Although it is biologi cally plausible that male circumcision could benefit MSM during insertive sex, no definitive data exist. Currently, there are no study results from RCTs including large enough numbers of MSM and results from observational studies are not conclusive among M SM overall or among MSM who practice exclusively insertive anal sex. For example, s ome epidemiologic data suggest that male circumcision provides partial protection for the insertive partner during penile

- anal sex while other studies do not

. In contrast, m ale circumcision provides

no biologically plausible HIV risk

- reduction benefit for the anal

- receptive partner and receptive anal intercourse carries a substantially higher risk for acquisition of HIV than insertive anal sex

.4

3 B

- 1 . Men who have sex with m en should be informed that :

o The demonstrated benefits of male circumcision for HIV risk reduction apply to heterosexual (penile

- vaginal) sex only

. o Male circumcision has not been proven t o reduce the risk of acquiring HIV or other STIs during anal sex among men

. o While some MSM may choose to be circumcised because of the potential to decrease risk for the insertive anal sex partner, m ale circumcision involves potential risks (see Adverse Events section of Box 1) and costs

.

4

. Counseling parents of m a le newborn s , children, or adolescents

Health benefits and risks of elective neonatal , pediatric, or adolescent male circumcision should be considered in consultation with medical providers . In the case of discussion about neonatal circumcision , ideally such discussion should occur prior to the birth of the child . Ultimately, whether to circumcise a male neonate or child is a decision made by parents or guardians on behalf of their newborn son or dependent child

. When counseling parents about male circu mcision for a n adolescent minor , the adolescent should be included in the decision

- making process about undergoing elective male circumcision

. When counseling an adolescent inquiring about male circumcision, parents should be engaged in the discussion, unl ess the adolescent is legally emancipated.

4

- A

. Parents and guardians should be informed about the medical benefits and risks of neonatal

, pediatric, or adolescent medically performed male circumcision (see Box) :

o During infancy, circumcised infants are less likely than uncircumcised infants to experience urinary tract infections (UTIs), although UTIs are uncommon during infancy

. o C ircumcised boys are less likely than uncircumcised males to experience balanitis and balanoposthitis

. o During adulthood, circumcised males are less likely than uncircumcised males to experience penile or possibly prostate cancer

. o Other a nticipated health benefits derive in part from future prevention of HIV and some STI s acquired through heterosexual sex. The r isk for any individual neonate

, child, or adolescent cannot be definitively defined at the time that a circumcision decision is made ; for example, current risks for H IV and STIs , such as those for a particular individual’s racial/ethnic group or gender, may not remain constant in the future.

o Considerations for the timing of male circumcision :

 Neonatal male circumcision is, safer, and heals more rapidly than circumcision performed on older boys , adolescent males

, and men , and is less expensive

.

 Most of the health benefits of male circumcision accrue after sexual debut

.

 Male circumcision can also be conducted in adulthood when the individual can make the decision for himself

. However, male circumcision after sexual debut could result in missed opportunities for :5  HIV and STI prevention during the window period between sexual debut and circumcision

 P revention of UTIs during infancy

. o The most common ly described c omplications of medically pe r formed male circumcision in the United States are typically uncommon and eas ily managed. Severe complications are rare in all age groups.

 Among newborns and children age 1 to 9 years, most frequently reported complications include bleeding and inflammation of the penis or the need for corrective procedures 2

. Complications occur in less than 1⁄2 % of infants, and in approximately 9% of children age 1 to 9 years 15

.

 A mong persons 10 years of age and older, the most frequently reported complications include those complications reported in younger children as well as wounds of the penis 3

. C omplications occur in approximately 5% of persons in this ag e group 15

. There are not specific data about the frequency of complications in the adolescent age group (13

- 18).

o The America n Academy of Pediatrics Taskforce on Circumcision states that the health bene

fits of new born male circumcision outweigh the risks and that the benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for families who choose it 9

.

4

- B

. Medically performed n eonatal

, pediatric

, or adolescent male circumcision should be done by trained clinicians according to accepted standards of clinical care, with appropriate use of anesthesia

.

Contributors: Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, NCHHSTP, CDC

2 Corrective procedures Include repair of incomplete circumcision or removal of any attachments which may form after circumcision between the remaining foreskin and the head of the penis.
3 Any open wound of the penis without additional complications6

References

1. Bailey RC, Moses, S., Parker, C. B., Agot, K., MacLean, I., Krieger, J. N., Williams, C. F. M., Ndinya

- Achola, J. O. The protective effect of adult male circumcision against HIV acquisition is sustained for at least 54 months: results from the Kisumu, Kenya trial. XVIII International AIDS Conference; 2010; Vienna, Austria. 2. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Feb 24 2007;369(9562):643

- 656. 3. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi

- Tambekou J, Sitta R, Pur en A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS medicine. Nov 2005;2(11):e298. 4. Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai , Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. Feb 24 2007;369(9562):657

- 666. 5. Sobngwi

- Tambekou J, Taljaard D, Lissouba P, et al. Effect of HSV

- 2 serostatus on acquisition of HIV by young men: results of a longitudinal study in Orange Farm, South Africa. The Jour

nal of infectious diseases. Apr 1 2009;199(7):958

- 964. 6. Tobian AA, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, et al. Male circumcision for the prevention of HSV

2 and HPV infections and syphilis. The New England journal of medicine. Mar 26 2009;360(13):1298

- 1309. 7. Auvert B , Sobngwi

- Tambekou J, Cutler E, et al. Effect of male circumcision on the prevalence of high

- risk human papillomavirus in young men: results of a randomized controlled trial conducted in Orange Farm, South Africa. The Journal of infectious diseases. Jan 1 2009;199(1):14

- 19. 8. American Urological Association. Circumcision. 2012; http://www.auanet.org/about/policy

- statements/circumcision.cfm . Accessed 1/24/2013. 9. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision Policy Statement. Pediatrics. Sep 2012;130(3):e756

- 785. 10. American Academy of Family Physicians. Position paper on neonatal circumcision. 2007; http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/clinical/clinicalrecs/guidelines/Circumcison.html

. Accessed 1/25/2013. 11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence in the United S tates, 2007

- 2010. HIV Surveillance Supplementatl Report. 2012;17(4). http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/surveillance/resources/reports/2010supp_vol17no4/index.htm

. Access ed 20 April 2013. 12. Smith DK, Taylor A, Kilmarx PH, et al. Male circumcision in the United States for the prevention of HIV infection and other adverse health outcomes: report from a CDC consultation. Public health reports. Jan

- Feb 2010;125 Suppl 1:72

- 82

. 13. Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Background, Methods, and Synthesis of Scientific Information Used to Inform the Draft: Recommendations for Providers Counseling Male Patients and Parents Regarding Elective Male Circumcision and the Prevention of HIV Infection and Other Adverse Health Outcomes. 2013.7

14. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson FE, et al. Heterosexually transmitted HIV infection among African Americans in North Carolina. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2006;41(5):616

- 623. 15. El Bcheraoui CZ, X.; Cooper, C. S.; Rose, C. E.; Kilmarx, P.H.; Chen, R. T. Rates of Adverse Events Associated with Male Circumcision in U.S. Medical Settings, 2001

– 2010. Pediatrics. 2013.

Box : Health Benefits and Risks of Elective Medically Performed Male Circumcision

 Health benefits of elective male circumcision in adults and adolescents :

o Male circumcision reduces the risk of acquiring HIV infect ion through penile

- vaginal

sex by 50

- 60%, as demonstrated in three well

- conducted clinical trials among adult

men living in sub

- Saharan Africa

. o In clinical trials involving heterosexual males living in sub

- Saharan Africa , male circumcision reduces the risk of some sexually transmitted infection s.

 HSV

- 2 4 : circumcised men were approximately 30%

- 45% less likely to acquire HSV

- 2 infection than were uncircumcised men.

 HPV 5 : circumcised men were approximately 30% less likely to be infected with high

- risk strains of HPV associated with canc ers than were uncircumcised men.

 Adverse events and risks associated with elective male circumcision of adults :

o For adult male circumcision performed by clinicians, the rate of adverse events is between 2% and 4%, with pain, bleeding, infection and unsat isfactory post

- surgical appearance most commonly reported. While severe and/or long

- term complications have been reported, they are so rare that they have not been precisely established.

o Adult men who undergo circumcision generally report minimal or no change in sexual satisfaction or function.

 Health benefits of neonatal male circumcision :

o The estimated annual rate of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in uncircumcised male infants is 0.70%. Male circumcision reduces the risk for infant UTIs by about 80%.

o In the U.S., t he estimated life time risk of penile cancer for male s is about 1 in 1,400 (0.0 7%) and that of prostate cancer is about 15% . Neonatal male circumcision reduces the risk of penile carcinoma by about 90% and may reduce the risk of prostate cancer by 15% compared to men who are uncircumcised.

 Adverse events and risks associated with neonatal male circumcision:

o A dverse events: For male circumcision performed by clinicians,

 the rate of reported adverse events is as follows

 0.4% in infants (age through 12 mo.)

 9.1% in children ( age 1

- 9 years)

4 HSV

- 2 = herpes simplex virus type 2

5 HPV = human papillomavirus8  5.3% in persons (age 10 years and older)

 Most commonly reported complications in all age groups include bleeding and inflammation of the penis, and correctional procedures 6

.

 The incidence of severe adverse events associated with male circumcision performed by clinicians, such as permanent disabilities, disfigurements

, and death, is so low th at rates have not been precisely established ; t hese events have occur red, but are rare. Other major complications requiring intervention including major bleeding, and severe infection are uncommon.

6 Frequently reported corrective procedures include repair of incomplete circumcision, lysis or excision of penile post

- circumcision adhesions, and division of penile adhesions.