alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)(as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  I, Kenneth C. Riscica, certify that:
 
 1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Magna-Lab, Inc.;
 
 2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.    not used;
 
 4.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 c)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
  Dated: January 18, 2013

By:
/s/  Kenneth C. RiscicaKenneth C. Riscica, Treasurer & Secretary

(principal financial officer)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

448 

KA 14-02169 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANDRE NORWOOD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (DANIEL GROSS OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of

the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of

the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Daniel J. Doyle, J.), entered

October 29, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant to vacate

a judgment of conviction. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion

pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h) seeking to vacate the judgment

convicting him following a jury trial of murder in the second degree

(Penal Law § 125.25 [2]), based upon the alleged denial of effective

assistance of counsel. Specifically, defendant alleged that, when he

discussed a plea offer of 15 years to life, defense counsel failed to

advise him that the maximum sentence, if convicted after trial, was 25

years to life. Following a hearing, Supreme Court determined that

defendant’s self-serving testimony to that effect was not credible and

that he therefore failed to meet the requisite burden of proving by a

preponderance of the evidence that he was denied effective assistance

of counsel (see CPL 440.30 [6]). “The court’s credibility

determination is entitled to great weight . . . , and we perceive no

basis for reversal on the record before us” (People v Smith, 16 AD3d

1081, 1082, lv denied 4 NY3d 891; see People v Campbell, 106 AD3d

1507, 1508, lv denied 21 NY3d 1002). 

Entered: April 28, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

JESUS GONZALEZ, an individual,

 Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-22636-KMW

v. 

ALDEN ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a 

ALDEN SUITES, 

Defendant.

______________________________________/

STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff, JESUS 

GONZALEZ, and Defendant, ALDEN ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a ALDEN SUITES, by and

through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that this action shall be DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees, except as 

stated in the parties’ settlement agreement. 

DATED: August 19, 2020

 

 COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. 

By: /s/ Justin C. Sorel

 Justin C. Sorel, Esq.

 Florida Bar No. 0016256

 justin.sorel@csklegal.com

 Nicole E. Perna, Esq. 

 Florida Bar No. 1000394

 nicole.perna@csklegal.com

 222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 120

 West Palm Beach, FL 33401

 Ph: (561) 383-9229

 Attorneys for Defendants

LAW OFFICES OF NOLAN KLEIN, P.A.

By: /s/ Nolan Klein

 Nolan Klein, Esq.

 Florida Bar No. 647977

 5550 Glades Road, Suite 500

 Boca Raton, FL 33431

 Ph: (954) 745-0588

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

 klein@nklegal.com

Case 1:20-cv-22636-KMW Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/19/2020 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATion OFTHE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I, Thomas J. Stallings, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this reporton Form 10-Q of Internet Commerce Corporation;

2.             Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.               Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.              Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c.               Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a.               All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b.              Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 14, 2006
| By:    | /s/  Thomas J. Stallings |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas J.  Stallings     |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
### §7435. Civil damages for unauthorized enticement of information disclosure

#### (a) In general

If any officer or employee of the United States intentionally compromises the determination or collection of any tax due from an attorney, certified public accountant, or enrolled agent representing a taxpayer in exchange for information conveyed by the taxpayer to the attorney, certified public accountant, or enrolled agent for purposes of obtaining advice concerning the taxpayer's tax liability, such taxpayer may bring a civil action for damages against the United States in a district court of the United States. Such civil action shall be the exclusive remedy for recovering damages resulting from such actions.

#### (b) Damages

In any action brought under subsection (a), upon a finding of liability on the part of the defendant, the defendant shall be liable to the plaintiff in an amount equal to the lesser of $500,000 or the sum of—

(1) actual, direct economic damages sustained by the plaintiff as a proximate result of the information disclosure, and

(2) the costs of the action.

Damages shall not include the taxpayer's liability for any civil or criminal penalties, or other losses attributable to incarceration or the imposition of other criminal sanctions.

#### (c) Payment authority

Claims pursuant to this section shall be payable out of funds appropriated under section 1304 of title 31, United States Code.

#### (d) Period for bringing action

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an action to enforce liability created under this section may be brought without regard to the amount in controversy and may be brought only within 2 years after the date the actions creating such liability would have been discovered by exercise of reasonable care.

#### (e) Mandatory stay

Upon a certification by the Commissioner or the Commissioner's delegate that there is an ongoing investigation or prosecution of the taxpayer, the district court before which an action under this section is pending shall stay all proceedings with respect to such action pending the conclusion of the investigation or prosecution.

#### (f) Crime-fraud exception

Subsection (a) shall not apply to information conveyed to an attorney, certified public accountant, or enrolled agent for the purpose of perpetrating a fraud or crime.

(Added Pub. L. 104–168, title XII, §1203(a), July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1470.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7435 was renumbered 7437 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 104–168, title XII, §1203(c), July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1471, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section and renumbering former section 7435 as 7436 of this title] shall apply to actions after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 30, 1996]."
HomeAbout NRCHow We RegulateEnforcementAlternative Dispute Resolution

# Trending Data

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, May 17, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Pre-Investigation ADR
          - Enforcement ADR
          - Trending Data
          - Background and Guidance Documents
          - Contact Us

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, May 17, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          66,101
<SECURITIES>                                17,932,005
<RECEIVABLES>                                  427,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,546
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,428,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          433,251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,995,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,428,432
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               507,331
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                456,318
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            456,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   456,318
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,707,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,193,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    270,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,541,332
<PP&E>                                       6,624,543
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,087,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,255,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,450,710
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,361
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,531,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,255,071
<SALES>                                      5,432,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,354,958
<CGS>                                          984,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,300,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,703,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                359,836
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,035
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            349,801
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   349,801
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>
        
<CAPTION>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information
                  extracted from  Millenium Istec Inc.'s  March 31,  1998
                  financial statements  and is qualified  in its  entirety
                  by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<CIK>                    0000894551
<NAME>                   Millenium Istec Inc.

       

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                        1339
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               240780
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                   1477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             32940
<PP&E>                                                       46228
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (680)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              911320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       422533
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                  449633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                911320
<SALES>                                                       3404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              3404
<CGS>                                                          773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             32299
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            1966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (31634)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (31634)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (31634)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.01)








        
</PAGE>




 

 





</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

|I, Jeffrey E. Coombs,
  certify that:
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     

|Date: November 15, 2004 | By: | /s/
  Jeffrey E. Coombs                
|----------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------
|                        |     |                                        
|                        |     | Jeffrey
  E. Coombs                    
|                        |     | President
  and Chief Executive Officer
|                        |     |                                        

---

---
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 429

**Question 429:** A "Note" added to the answer to Question 126 clarifies the answer with respect to nuclear power plants. Does this clarification also apply to non-power reactor facilities?

**Answer:** Yes. As indicated in that "Note", workers at nuclear power plants, for whom individual monitoring is required and who are outside restricted areas need not wear personal dosimeters to measure external doses from effluents. However, they should wear personal dosimeters when performing work with or near licensed materials that are sources of external occupational exposure (e.g., when performing a radiation survey of a vehicle loaded with radioactive material ready for shipping.)

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1502).

NOTE: Questions 444, 445, and 446 relate to determining whether occupational radiation dose monitoring of an individual is required (i.e., is the individual likely to exceed 10% of an applicable limit?)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
### §4105. Attorneys' fees

In any action brought in a domestic court to enforce a foreign judgment for defamation, including any such action removed from State court to Federal court, the domestic court shall, absent exceptional circumstances, allow the party opposing recognition or enforcement of the judgment a reasonable attorney's fee if such party prevails in the action on a ground specified in section 4102(a), (b), or (c).

(Added Pub. L. 111–223, §3(a), Aug. 10, 2010, 124 Stat. 2383.)