alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skynet Telematics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB, for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Tomas George Wilmot, President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Tomas George Wilmot
------------------------
    Tomas George Wilmot
    President

April 30, 2007


<PAGE>
#### Charles T. Murphy, Respondent, v. Stuard Hirschman, Appellant, and Henrietta Hirschman and Others, Defendants.

Motion granted, with leave to vacate if the case is not diligently prosecuted, and argued not later than the May term. Present— Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Ratesetting
            - CVP Annual Ratebooks & Schedules
            - CVP Ratebooks - M&I, 2012 

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP)                  - About the CVP
                - Water Info Links
                - Ratesetting
                - Projects/Activities
                - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation                         of the CVP and SWP
                - Laws/Regs/Links
                - Financial Information 
                - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
              - Programs & Activities
              - Projects & Facilities
              - Doing Business with Reclamation
              - Public Affairs
              - Employment
              - Recreation
              - Site Index
              - Contact Us

## CVP Ratebooks - M&I, 2012

*Note:  Documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) require Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher to view, download Adobe Acrobat Reader*

*Last Updated: 7/15/20*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

          - Contact Us
          - Site Index
          - Accessibility
          - Disclaimer
          - DOI
          - FOIA
          - No Fear Act
          - Notices
          - Privacy Policy
          - Quality of Information
          - Recreation.gov
          - USA.gov
March 24 , 2015

Mr. Kevin W. Glenn

2913 Palace Place

Murfreesboro, TN 37129

Dear Mr. Glenn :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your Feb ruary 4 , 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

0306 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR fr om which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to suppor t your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may c all (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 427

**Question 427:** The word "external" in 10 CFR 20.1302 (b) (2) (ii) refers to any radiation source which could irradiate an individual from outside the body. Since sources include both airborne radioactive materials and contained sources, the dose from airborne radioactive materials could be double-counted -- as a concentration pursuant to 10 CFR 20.1302 (b) (2) (i) and as direct radiation pursuant to 10 CFR 20.1302 (b) (2) (ii). In a situation where the licensee was approaching the 50 mrem/yr limit from direct radiation from contained sources, the additional direct radiation component from airborne releases may cause this limit to be exceeded. Clearly, this situation could be addressed through use of 10 CFR 20.1302 (b) (1); however, the intent of the revised Part 20 appears to provide viable alternatives to complying with the regulations whenever feasible. Must a licensee who elects to use the method of 10 CFR 20.1302 (b) (2) for demonstrating compliance with the public dose limits "double-count" the dose from airborne radioactive materials?

**Answer:** No. External sources ordinarily include all radiation sources outside of the body, such as direct radiation from contained sources and direct radiation from airborne radioactive materials. To the extent that doses from airborne radioactive materials (e.g., noble gases) are accounted for as concentration values pursuant to 10 CFR 20.1302 (b) (2) (i), they need not be accounted for as external sources under 10 CFR 20.1302 (b) (2) (ii) in determining compliance with the 50 mrem/yr limit. (However, airborne radioactive material does need to be accounted for in determining compliance with the limit of 2 mrem in any one hour).

(References: 10 CFR 20.1302, 10 CFR 20.1301)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
#### Patrick W. O’Connor, Respondent, v. Richard Webber, Jr., and William Webber, Copartners, etc., Appellants.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. (See opinion in *O'Connor*v. *Webber,*decided herewith, *ante,*p. 175.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
### [§§4591 to 4597. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1904(a)(15), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1814]

Sections, comprising subchapter F, "Oleomargarine", were struck out in the repeal of this chapter by Pub. L. 94–455.

Section 4591, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 545, related to imposition of a tax on all oleomargarine imported from foreign countries.

Section 4592, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 545, related to definitions of oleomargarine, manufacturer, wholesale dealer, and retail sales.

Section 4593, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 546, related to exemptions to tax imposed by section 4591.

Section 4594, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 546, related to packing requirements for manufacturers of oleomargarine.

Section 4595, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 546, related to wholesale and retail selling requirements for oleomargarine.

Section 4596, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 547, related to filing of bonds by manufacturers of oleomargarine.

Section 4597, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 547, related to books and returns of wholesale dealers and manufacturers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on first day of first month which begins more than 90 days after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1904(d) of Pub. L. 94–455 set out as an Effective Date of 1976 Amendment note under section 4041 of this title.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ELLIS HODGES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 570 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the Annual Report of Terax Energy, Inc. (the "Company")  on Form 10-KSB/A for  the six month period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence  Finn, Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 /s/ Lawrence J. Finn  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) 

 Date: May 25, 2006
Recurring Benefits Dates 

What When

Leave Year begins -- Annual leave that you will 

accrue during the year is advanced to you. 

January - beginning of the first pay period 

of the calendar year. 

Pay Increases -- Annual comparability increase 

(ACI) / locality pay adjustments. 

January - usually the first pay period of the 

year. 

Health Benefits changes -- made during open 

season become effective. 

January - beginning of the first pay period 

of the calendar year. 

Health Benefits changes -- made outside of 

open season -- if eligible. 

Beginning of the next pay period - 

following the receipt of your Employee 

Express transaction or SF 2809. 

CSRS Retirement -- Last day to retire under 

CSRS and receive an annuity payment for that 

month. 

3rd day of each month

Pay day Every other Tuesday

FERS Retirement -- Last day to retire under 

FERS and receive an annuity payment for the 

following month. 

Last day of each month

Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) -- interfund transfers 

effective date. 

Last day of each month

Health Benefits Providers -- on-site visits. Periodically 

Health Benefits Open Season Mid-November through mid-December
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


                           [ERNST & YOUNG LETTERHEAD]

November 13, 2002

The Trustee
Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-70394) of the Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust for the
registration of 3,568,791 trust units of beneficial interest, of our report
dated November 13, 2002 relating to the unaudited condensed interim financial
statements of the Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust that are included in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.





                                        Very truly yours,


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



                                       24
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 61

**Question 61:** Will the annual reports that are required by power reactor technical specifications (reports that tabulate occupational exposures greater than 100 mrem/yr according to work and job functions) still be required after the revised Part 20 is implemented.

**Answer:** Yes. There are no plans to change this requirement of the Technical Specifications. However, the reports on occupational exposures required by the old Part 20 in 10 CFR 20.407 (statistical summary reports) and 10 CFR 20.403 (termination reports), will no longer be required. These statistical summary and termination reports are being replaced by the revised "reports of individual monitoring" required by 10 CFR 20.2206.

(Reference: Reactor Technical Specifications, 10 CFR 20.2206)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, December 13, 2017
#### § 105.403 Designated Agency Ethics Officials.

The Designated Agency Ethics Official and Alternates administer the program for Financial Disclosure Statements under 5 CFR 2634.201, receive and evaluate these statements, and provide advice and counsel regarding matters relating to the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 and its implementing regulations. The duties and responsibilities of the Designated Agency Ethics Official and Alternates are set forth in more detail in 5 CFR 2638.203, which is promulgated and amended by the Office of Government Ethics.

[62 FR 2399, Jan. 26, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 48477, Sept. 16, 1997]
DISTRICT SIX CQMMUNtTY 

Regular Meeting of Monday, June 26,2006,7:00 pm 

D#6 Learning Center, Komatke Centers, Komatke, Arizona 

AGENDA 

I. CALL TO ORDER 

Ill. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 

IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 

a. May 22,2006 

b. June 12,2006 

V. PRESENTATIONS 

VI. REPORTS 

a. Notice of Public Comment Period on GRlC TIP, Janet Travis, DEQ Air Program 

b. Tribal Council Report, P. Antone, T. Evans, A. Villareal 

VII. UNFIhIISHED BUSINESS 

1. 5-Year Capital Budget Plan, Katherine Hopkins, Project Ad mins. Dist#6 

2. WRA Policy Revision, Anthony Hill, Chairman, Executive Committee 

VIII. NEW BUSINESS 

1. Request for D#6 to Appoint Representative to DPW Advisory Committee 

2. Executive Committee - Appropriations 

3. D#6 Elderly Bylaws, Phyllis Machukay 

4. Ratification to Elder Advisory Committee, Sylvia McCabe, Chairman 

5. Recreation Master Plan 

IX. ANNOLINCEMENTS 

X. ADJOURNMENT 
6/5/06 

Gila River Indian Community 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Air Program 

GRIC laws that have not been finalized are required to go through an 

approval process designed to give Community members a chance to 

comment on pending ordinances. This allows residents to play an 

active role regarding issues that may affect them. The Air Quality 

Program has drafted 13 ordinances that will manage air pollution 

within the Community, and will be conducting a public hearing on July 

20,2006 to provide a forum for interested parties to submit verbal and 

written comments. See attached document for details on the hearing. 

There have been many questions regarding how these two particular ordinances 

will affect residential burning of landscape waste and agricultural activities that 

produce dust. 

O~en Burnina Ordinance: 

The ordinance regulating open burning at Gila River applies to GRIC residents 

burning yard waste near homes and large commercial projects performed by 

contractors, such as land-clearing for development. Contractors will be required 

to obtain permits and pay permit fees. It will be necessary for GRIC residents to 

obtain a permit but a fee is not required. 

This ordinance does not affect the current process used by GRIC members to 

burn yard waste. Residents may continue to apply for burn permits to 

manage weeds and other types of landscape waste. As indicated on the 

permit application, residents are not allowed to burn household trash. The GRIC 

Solid Waste Ordinance prohibits burning this type of material and has been in 

place for 11 years. In 1995, GRIC members in all seven districts provided 

comments to DEQ requesting a ban on the outdoor burning of trash due to 

excessive amounts of smoke, often from toxic materials. Trash bins were 

provided for Community members to dispose of material so burning would not be 

necessary. For basic information on the process for applying for a burn permit, 

please ask your district coordinator. For the past three summers residential 

burning has been prohibited due to hot, dry weather conditions that may 

contribute to a wildfire. As of Mav 22, there is currentlv a ban on burninq 

within the Communitv until further notice due to danaerous conditions.
#### § 108.885 Disposition of assets to NMVC Company's Associates.

Except with SBA's prior written approval, you are not permitted to dispose of assets (including assets acquired in liquidation) to any Associate. As a prerequisite to such approval, you must demonstrate that the proposed terms of disposal are at least as favorable to you as the terms obtainable elsewhere.
#### § 8340.0-7 Penalties.

Any person who violates or fails to comply with the regulations of subparts 8341 and 8343 is subject to arrest, conviction, and punishment pursuant to appropriate laws and regulations. Such punishment may be a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisonment for not longer than 12 months, or both.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **3 -**  **4872**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JUAN JARAMILLO

- JIMENEZ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00342

- CCE

- 1 )

Submitted : April 28, 2014 Decided: May 13, 2014

Before KING, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Louis C. Allen III, Federal Public Defender, Mireille P. Clough, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Angela H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensbo ro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Juan Jaramillo

- Jimenez appeals the district court’s judgment and commitment order entered after his supervised release was revoked. The court sentenced Jaramillo

- Jimenez to serve eighteen months’ imprisonment consecutive to the sentence he was serving at the time. He contends that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. Finding no error, we affirm. The district court has broad discretio n when imposing

a sentence upon revo king a defendant’s supervised release. United States v. Webb , 738 F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 201 3 ). We will affirm the sentence if it is within the statutory maximum and is not “ plainly unreasonable.” United States v. Cr udup , 461 F.3d 433, 43 8 (4th Cir. 2006). We first consider whether the sentence is procedurally or substantively unreasonable. Webb , 738 F.3d at 640. A revocation sentence is procedurally reasonable if the district court considered the advisory policy

s tatement range and the § 3553(a) factors applicable to supervised release revocation. Crudup , 461 F.3d at 438

- 40. A sentence is substantively reasonable if the district court stated a proper basis for concluding the defendant should receive the sentence imposed, up to the statutory maximum. Id. at 440. Only if a sentence is found procedurally or substantively unreasonable will we then decide whether the sentence is plainly unreasonabl e. Id. at 439.3 In ordering the sentence at issue, the district court properly considered Jaramillo

- Jimenez unwillingness to abide by the terms of supervision, see United States v. Moulden , 478 F.3d 652, 655 (4th Cir. 2007) , and the need to deter further violations of supervised rel ease. See Webb , 738 F.3d at 642. Because the court stated a proper basis for the consecutive eighteen month sentence, we find no error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment and commitment order. We dispense with oral argument because th e facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insightful Corporation for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004, the undersigned, Fred Schapelhouman, Chief  Financial
Officer of Insightful Corporation, does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|3) |  | such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, as
amended; and
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|4) |  | the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results
of operations of Insightful Corporation.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | May
      17, 2004 | By: | /s/    Fred
      Schapelhouman
|----- | ------------------ | --- | -------------------------------
|      |                    |     |                                
|      |                    |     | Fred
      Schapelhouman       
|      |                    |     | Chief Financial Officer        

30

---