alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Contact Us
  Return to Previous Page
 Thing to Do
Hiking the Headland Trail
El Morro National Monument A trail leading towards a sandstone surface with small trees scattered across the top. Take the Headland Trail to see Atsinna Pueblo and a birds-eye view of the El Morro valley.
NPS Photo This 2-mile trail includes the Inscription Loop and takes you to the top of the El Morro bluff. It is a moderately strenuous trail with a gain of 224 ft of elevation. Hikers can choose to ascend via switchbacks or 132 stairs. At the top of the bluff, there are two ancestral Puebloan dwellings, one of which is partially excavated. Much of the upper section of the trail is on uneven sandstone so sturdy footwear is recommended. This trail is open Thursday through Monday from 9:00 am to 3:00 pm.
 Duration
60-150 Minutes
 Activity
Hiking
 Pets Allowed
Yes
 Activity Fee
No
 Location
El Morro National Monument
 
 Season
Year Round
 Time of Day
Day
 This trail is not wheelchair accessible. The Headland Trail includes climbing 132 stairs or moderately steep switchbacks and crosses the mesa top on an unpaved and uneven trail across bumpy sandstone.
 El Morro National Monument Tags el morro national monument
hiking
trail
pueblo
mesa
 A map showing a short trail with a solid white line and a longer trail with a dashed black lineThe Headland Trail is marked on the map by the dashed line.
 Tags el morro national monument
hiking
trail
pueblo
mesa
 Last updated: July 31, 2023


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Underground Railroad





Contact Us
  Site Index
 Last updated: February 7, 2017
 Tools Calendar
Site Index
Contact Us


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7173

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL CLARENCE HOOD,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00005-KDB-DCK-1; 5:18-cv00172-KDB)

Submitted: September 30, 2021 Decided: October 13, 2021

Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Michael Young, YOUNG LAW FIRM, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for 

Appellant. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Clarence Hood seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Hood’s informal brief, we 

conclude that Hood has not made the requisite showing.* See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see

also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an 

* Hood’s claim that counsel was ineffective in failing to explain Hood’s plea 

agreement’s forfeiture provision relating to Hood’s home is not properly before this court. 

See In re Under Seal, 749 F.3d 276, 285 (4th Cir. 2014) (“Our settled rule is simple: 

absent exceptional circumstances, we do not consider issues raised for the first time on 

appeal.” (alterations and internal quotation marks omitted)). To the extent Hood argues 

that the district court failed to construe his § 2255 motion liberally to include this claim, 

the court addressed all claims reasonably contemplated by Hood’s § 2255 motion.
3

important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved 

in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 20-60056-CIV-ALTMAN 

VIRGINIA ALDANA ALASTRA, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BCA FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC, and 

SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, 

Defendants. 

_________________________/ 

ORDER SCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE 

 The Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the 

“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692–1692p, et seq. Consistent with the Court’s practices in FDCPA 

cases, counsel are directed to appear at a status conference on Wednesday, June 24, 2020, at

1:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted telephonically. At that time, the parties shall dial 1-

888-363-4734 and enter access code 9127026, followed by the # symbol. Counsel must not 

utilize speakerphone functionality during the hearing. If possible, counsel should use a landline. 

Instructions for the status conference are as follows: 

1. The parties are not personally required to appear, but a representative of each 

party with full authority to enter a full and complete compromise must appear. 

2. Multiple cases will be called at once, at which time the attorneys will meet in the 

Court’s attorney conference rooms to discuss the possibility of reaching an 

amicable resolution. The Court will not oversee these discussions. 

3. If an agreement is reached, the parties shall promptly notify the Court. 

Case 0:20-cv-61054-RKA Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

4. The Plaintiff’s counsel must appear with the entire case file. If any of the 

Defendants have not yet appeared, the Plaintiff must serve a copy of this Order on 

any such Defendant within two business days of the date of this Order. 

5. The Defendant must appear with all evidence it has in support of its defenses. 

6. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter this Order in the following cases: 

a. 20-cv-60500 – Philippe v. Midland Funding, LLC, et al., 

i. (call in: 1:10 p.m.) 

b. 20-cv-61054 – Diaz et al., v. Mariner Finance, LLC 

i. (call in: 1:20 p.m.)

c. 20-cv-61104 – Barber v. Midland Funding, LLC. 

i. (call in: 1:30 p.m.)

d. 20-cv-61087 – Concepcion v. Frost-Arnett Company, et al.,

i. (call in: 1:40 p.m.)

e. 20-cv-60601 – Waiters v. Alliance CAS, LLC. 

i. (call in: 1:50 p.m.)

f. 20-cv-60611 – Turner, et al., v. Comenity Capital Bank. 

i. (call in: 2:00 p.m.)

 DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 19th day of June 2020. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 ROY K. ALTMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

cc: counsel of record 

Case 0:20-cv-61054-RKA Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### § 9212.4 Penalties.

Any person who knowingly and willfully violates the regulations at § 9212.1 of this title shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or to imprisonment of not more than 12 months, or both.
#### Preston C. Sherman, Appellant, v. William C. Swift, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
HomeAbout NRCEEO/Civil Rights Program

# Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Program

## Internal Civil Rights Program

  

## External Civil Rights Program

  

## Contact Us

  

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 03, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

            - Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Program
            - Affirmative Employment and Diversity Management
            - Special Emphasis Programs and EEO Advisory Committees
            - Reasonable Accommodations Procedures

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                  - The Commission
                  - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                  - Job Openings
                  - Palisades Restart
                  - Environmental Justice 
                  - Pilgrim Water Releases
                  - Monticello Tritium Issue
                  - International Strategy 2021-2025
                  - Tribal Liaison Program
                  - MAP-X
                  - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                  - OIG Hotline
                  - Rulemaking Activity
                  - Commission Documents
                  - Advanced Reactors
                  - Nuclear Security
                  - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 03, 2023
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/06/2002 Page 1 of 2
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/06/2002 Page 2 of 2
PUBLIC LAW 108–461—DEC. 21, 2004 118 STAT. 3875

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2523:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108–447 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

May 11, considered and passed House.

Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–461

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse located at 125 Bull Street in Savannah,

Georgia, as the ‘‘Tomochichi United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse located at 125 Bull Street in

Savannah, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘Tomochichi United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘Tomochichi United States Courthouse’’.

Approved December 21, 2004.

Dec. 21, 2004

[H.R. 2523]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2003, of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Keith B. Forman, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                      /s/ Keith B. Forman
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Keith B. Forman
                                      Vice President and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      (Principal Financial Officer)
                                      GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P.

                                      November 3, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. and will be retained by GulfTerra
Energy Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.825 Financial ability to operate.

A CDC must be able to sustain its operations continuously, with reliable sources of funds (such as income from services rendered and contributions from government or other sponsors). Any funds generated from 503 and 504 loan activity by a CDC remaining after payment of staff and overhead expenses must be retained by the CDC as a reserve for future operations or for investment in other local economic development activity in its Area of Operations. If a CDC is operating as a Multi-State CDC, it must maintain a separate accounting for each State of all 504 fee income and expenses and provide, upon SBA's request, evidence that the funds resulting from its Multi-State CDC operations are being invested in economic development activities in each State in which they were generated.

[65 FR 42633, July 11, 2000]
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Trip Idea

# Strenuous Hikes at Lake Mead National Recreation Area

## Strenuous Hikes

Sort By:RelevanceRecently UpdatedDate ReleasedTitle

Show1040 per page

lake mohave strenuous hikes

Last updated: November 21, 2023

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular 33.19-1, Guidance Material for 14 CFR Sec.  
33.19, Durability, for Reciprocating Engine Redesigned Parts

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of advisory circular.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This advisory circular (AC) provides guidance and acceptable 
methods, but not the only methods, that may be used to demonstrate that 
redesigned parts for reciprocating engines comply with the requirements 
of Sec.  33.19 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 
This AC addresses major type design changes, parts manufacturing 
approvals (PMA), and supplemental type certificates (STC) for drive 
system or structural parts in reciprocating engines.

DATES: The Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service, issued Advisory Circular 33.19-1 on September 27, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Federal Aviation Administration, 
Attn: Mark Rumizen, Engine and Propeller Standards Staff, ANE-110, 12 
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone: (781) 
238-7113; fax: (781) 238-7199; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c588a4b7aeeb97b0a8acbfa0ab85a3a4a4eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f426e7d64215d7a6266756a614f696e6e21686079">[email protected]</span></a>.
    We have filed in the docket all substantive comments received, and 
a report summarizing them. If you wish to review the docket in person, 
you may go to the above address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you wish to contact the 
above individual directly, you can use the above telephone number or e-
mail address provided.
    How To Obtain Copies: A paper copy of AC 33.19-1 may be obtained by 
writing to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Subsequent 
Distribution Office, DOT Warehouse, SVC-121.23, Ardmore East Business 
Center, 3341Q 75th Ave., Landover, MD 20785, telephone 301-322-5377, or 
by faxing your request to the warehouse at 301-386-5394. The AC will 
also be available on the Internet at ``http://www.faa.gov/'', select 
``Regulations and Policies'' and the link titled ``Advisory 
Circulars''.

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704.)

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 27, 2004.
Francis A. Favara,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 04-23073 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Harvey Baker, Respondent, against Crispell Brothers, Employer, and Continental Casualty Company, Appellant, and Fund for Reopened Cases, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Brewster, Deyo, Santry and Bergan, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.704 How are applications evaluated? ( a ) *Evaluation criteria.* In selecting Intermediaries, SBA will attempt to insure that Microloans are available to small businesses in all industries and particularly to small businesses located in urban and rural areas.
( b ) *Preference for organizations which make very small loans.* In selecting Intermediaries, SBA will give priority to applicants which maintain a portfolio of loans averaging $10,000 or less.
( c ) *Consideration of quasi-governmental organizations.* Generally, SBA will consider applications by quasi-governmental organizations only when it determines that program services for a particular geographic area would be best provided by such organization.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 66 FR 47878, Sept. 14, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.651 Claim to FTA by Registered Holder to replace Certificate. ( a ) To replace a Certificate because of loss, theft, destruction, mutilation, or defacement, the Registered Holder must: ( 1 ) Give the FTA information about the Certificate and the facts relating to the claim;
( 2 ) File an indemnity bond acceptable to SBA and the FTA with a surety to protect the interests of SBA and the FTA;
( 3 ) Pay the FTA its fee to replace a Certificate; and
( 4 ) Use an affidavit of loss (form available from the FTA) to report: ( i ) The name and address of the Registered Holder (and the name and capacity of any representative actually filing the claim);
( ii ) The Certificate by Pool number, if applicable;
( iii ) The Certificate number;
( iv ) The original principal amount;
( v ) The name in which the Certificate was registered;
( vi ) Any assignment, endorsement or other writing on the Certificate; and
( vii ) A statement of the circumstances of the theft or loss.
( b ) When the FTA receives notice of the theft or loss, it will stop any transfer of the Certificate. The Registered Holder must send to the FTA all available portions of a mutilated or defaced Certificate. When the Registered Holder completes these steps, the FTA will replace the Certificate.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to §906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned President and chief executive officer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company),
hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 26, 2008 (the Form 10-K),
filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 10, 2009



/s/    JAMES J. BAUMBERGERName:  James J. Baumberger Title:    President and chief executive officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, J. Patrick Lashinsky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that the Annual Report of ZipRealty, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZipRealty, Inc. 

 

Date: March 13, 2009 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by ZipRealty, Inc. and will be retained by ZipRealty, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.