alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         404,304
<SECURITIES>                                19,562,488
<RECEIVABLES>                                  405,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             700
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,382,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          399,892
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,982,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,382,702
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               630,236
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                559,950
<INCOME-TAX>                                   559,950
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            559,950
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   559,950
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### [§9804. Renumbered §9831]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     Micro-Economics, Inc. March 31, 2001 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894552
<NAME>                        MICRO-ECONOMICS, INC.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2001

<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2001

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .00



</TABLE>
### §2717. Discharge

The court, or a judge thereof, upon—

(1) application of the party when property has been attached and

(2) execution to the United States of a penal bond, approved by a judge, in double the value of the property attached and conditioned upon the return of the property or the payment of any judgment rendered by the court

may discharge the warrant of attachment as to the property of the applicant.

(Added Pub. L. 86–682, §9, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 708.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was derived from R.S. §931, which was originally classified to section 744 of former Title 28. Following the general revision and enactment of Title 28 by act June 25, 1948, R.S. §931 was reclassified to section 844 of Title 39. R.S. §931 was repealed by Pub. L. 86–682, §12(c), Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 708, (section 1 of which revised and enacted Title 39), and reenacted by section 9 thereof as section 2717 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 1, 1960, see section 11 of Pub. L. 86–682, 74 Stat. 708.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wells Real Estate Fund VII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|November 14, 2005         
|                          
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|November 14, 2005
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60196

Conference Calendar

 

CHARLIE WEST SCOTT,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:01-CV-72-RG

--------------------

February 20, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charlie West Scott, now federal prisoner #02199-043, appeals

the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas

corpus petition raising a challenge pursuant to Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), to his conviction and sentence for

conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine base,

possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine base, and

possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine base within

1,000 feet of a school. Scott argues that he is entitled to
No. 02-60196

-2-

raise Apprendi claims in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, that the

drug quantity should have been alleged in his indictment, and

that the issue of drug quantity should have been submitted to the

jury, who could not have found him responsible for the quantity

of drugs attributed to him at sentencing. 

Under the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, a 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 petition that attacks custody resulting from a federal

sentence may be entertained only if the petitioner establishes

that the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 remedy is inadequate or ineffective to

test the legality of his detention. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255;

Tolliver v. Dobre, 211 F.3d 876, 878 (5th Cir. 2000). The

savings clause applies to a claim “(i) that is based on a

retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes

that the petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent

offense and (ii) that was foreclosed by circuit law at the time

when the claim should have been raised in the petitioner’s trial,

appeal, or first § 2255 motion.” Reyes-Requena v. United States,

243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Because Apprendi is not

retroactively applicable on collateral review, Scott’s Apprendi

claims do not satisfy the requirements of the savings clause and

thus cannot be raised in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. See Wesson

v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont, Tx., 305 F.3d 343, 347 (5th Cir.

2002).

AFFIRMED.
§ 3862.9 Public availability of information. ( a ) All data and information concerning Federal and Indian minerals submitted under this part 3860 are subject to part 2 of this title. Part 2 of this title includes the regulations of the Department of the Interior covering the public disclosure of data and information contained in Department of the Interior records. Certain mineral information not protected from public disclosure under part 2 of this title may be made available for inspection without a Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) request.
( b ) When you submit data and information under this part 3860 that you believe to be exempt from disclosure to the public, you must clearly mark each page that you believe includes confidential information. BLM will keep all data and information confidential to the extent allowed by § 2.13(c) of this title.
[63 FR 52955, Oct. 1, 1998]
#### § 6302.17 When may I use a wheelchair in BLM wilderness?

If you have a disability that requires the use of a wheelchair, you may use a wheelchair in a wilderness. Consistent with the Wilderness Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12207), BLM is not required to facilitate such use by building any facilities or modifying any conditions of lands within a wilderness area.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, TOM LAM, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
of Auto-Q International, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certifies that to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the period ended September 30, 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




         /s/ Tom Lam
-----------------------------------------------------

Name:        Tom Lam
         ----------------------------------

Date:        April 25, 2003
         ----------------------------------



                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
----

Information procedure — Technical rules

(2005/C 265/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services. (OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37; OJ L 217, 5.8.1998, p. 18).

Notifications of draft national technical rules received by the Commission

The Commission draws attention to the judgement delivered on 30 April 1996 in the ‘CIA Security’ case (C-194/94 — ECR I, p. 2201), in which the Court of Justice ruled that Articles 8 and 9 of Directive 98/34/EC (formerly 83/189/EEC) are to be interpreted as meaning that individuals may rely on them before national courts which must decline to apply a national technical regulation which has not been notified in accordance with the Directive.

This judgement confirms the Commission's communication of 1 October 1986 (OJ C 245, 1.10.1986, p. 4).

Accordingly, breach of the obligation to notify renders the technical regulations concerned inapplicable, and consequently unenforceable against individuals.

For more information on the notification procedure, please write to:

Also consult the website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/

If you require any further information on these notifications, please contact the national departments listed below:

LIST OF NATIONAL DEPARTMENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DIRECTIVE 98/34/EC

BELGIUM

CZECH REPUBLIC

DENMARK

GERMANY

ESTONIA

GREECE

SPAIN

FRANCE

IRELAND

ITALY

CYPRUS

LATVIA

LITHUANIA

LUXEMBOURG

HUNGARY

MALTA

NETHERLANDS

AUSTRIA

POLAND

PORTUGAL

SLOVENIA

SLOVAKIA

FINLAND

SWEDEN

UNITED KINGDOM

EFTA - ESA

TURKEY

----

(1)  Year — registration number — Member State of origin.

(2)  Period during which the draft may not be adopted.

(3)  No standstill period since the Commission accepts the grounds of urgent adoption invoked by the notifying Member State.

(4)  No standstill period since the measure concerns technical specifications or other requirements or rules on services linked to fiscal or financial measures, pursuant to the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC.

(5)  Information procedure closed.

----
#### William A. Campbell, Receiver, v. Ed M. Tracy, Receiver.

Filed October 20, 1904.

No. 13,561.

Decision followed. The decision in this case is governed by the principles announced in *Campbell v. Noyes, Norman & Oo., ante,*p. 201, which is followed.

*549Error to the district court for Johnson county: John S. Stull, Judge.

*Reversed.*

*L. C. Chapman*and *George A. Adams,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ed M. Tracy, pro se.*

Letton, C.

This is a proceeding in error by which it is sought to review a judgment of the district court for Johnson county by which the defendant in error was adjudged to have a lien upon the real estate of the Chamberlain Banking TTou.se, a corporation, then in the hands of the plaintiff in error as receiver. It appears that, in the settlement of the affairs of the firm of Fairall & Rubelman, a partnership, a receiver was appointed by the district court for Johnson county, and an accounting had between said partners, to which the Chamberlain Banking House was made a party; among other things the court found that there was in the hands of the Chamberlain Banking House to the credit of said firm the sum of $292.19, and the following order was made in said case: “It is therefore ordered by the court that the defendant, the Chamberlain Banking House, pay to the receiver the sum of $292.19 now in its hands.” No further order was made in this behalf, nor was execution awarded against the bank. Afterwards, and before the payment of this amount, the Chamberlain Banking House failed, and the plaintiff in error was appointed receiver thereof. Application was made by the defendant in error, as receiver of said firm of Fairall & Rubelman, for an order declaring his claim to be a lien upon the real estate of the corporation. The district court found “that the order made in the case of Fairall & Rubelman, though informal in its terms, is and was a judgment regularly entered in this court, and constitutes a valid lien upon said premises from the date of its being rendered,” and *550directed the receiver to pay the same out of the proceeds of the sale of the real estate. The principles governing this case are the same as those applied in the case of *Campbell v. Noyes, Norman & Co., ante,*p. 201. In that case there was an order directing the Chamberlain Banking House to pay to the person named therein a specified sum of money, but there was no recital that one party shall have and recover of the other a sum certain, and that in default of payment execution shall issue. It seems clear that no execution could issue upon the order directing the payment of the money by the Chamberlain Banking House to the defendant in error, without a further order being made by the district court. The reasoning in the opinion in *Campbell v. Noyes, Norman & Co.*applies to the facts in this case and we adopt the same.

We recommend that the judgment of the district court be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

By the Court:

For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed.
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMSDouglas P. Williams Chief
Financial Officer





August 12, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22435]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Office of Research and Development


Government Owned Invention Available for Licensing

AGENCY: Office of Research and Development.

ACTION: Notice of government owned invention available for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The invention listed below is owned by the U.S. Government as 
represented by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and is available for 
licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 and/or 
CRADA Collaboration under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to achieve expeditious 
commercialization of results of federally funded research and 
development. Foreign patents are filed on selected inventions to extend 
market coverage for U.S. companies and may also be available for 
licensing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical and licensing information on 
the invention may be obtained by writing to: Mindy L. Aisen, M.D., 
Department of Veterans Affairs, Acting Director Technology Transfer 
Program, Office of Research and Development, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20420; fax: 202-254-0473; e-mail at: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f79a9e99938ed9969e849299b79a969e9bd98196d9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb9692959f82d59a92889e95bb969a9297d58d9ad59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>. Any request for information should include the 
Number and Title for the relevant invention as indicated below. Issued 
patents may be obtained from the Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent 
and Trademark Office, Washington, DC 20231.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The invention available for licensing is:
    U.S. Patent Application No. 10/324,374 ``Method of Predicting 
Cytokine Response to Tissue Injury''.

    Dated: September 27, 2004.
Anthony J. Principi,
Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 04-22435 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.0**

**Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscalquarter ended June 26, 2004 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complyingwith Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Anthony J. Cuti,the Chief Executive Officer and John K. Henry, the Chief Financial Officer ofDuane Reade Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.     the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and

2.     the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Duane Reade Inc.
|                     | /s/ ANTHONY  J. CUTI      |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                     | Anthony J. Cuti           |
|                     | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                     | /s/ JOHN K. HENRY         |   |
|                     | John K. Henry             |
| Date: June 16, 2005 | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Duane Reade Inc. and will be retainedby Duane Reade Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

----
§ 101.200 When does SBA hire private counsel? ( a ) *Business loans.* SBA may hire private counsel to represent it in regard to business loans when the volume of activity in an area is not sufficient to require a full-time SBA employee, or the area is too remote for economical use of a full-time SBA employee.
( b ) *Disaster loans.* SBA may hire private counsel in regard to disaster loans when the disaster presents an emergency and a volume of activity that cannot be promptly and economically serviced by available SBA employees.