alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7271. Penalties for offenses relating to stamps

Any person who with respect to any tax payable by stamps—

#### (1) Failure to attach or cancel stamps, etc.

Fails to comply with rules or regulations prescribed pursuant to section 6804 (relating to attachment, cancellation, etc., of stamps), unless such failure is shown to be due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect; or

#### (2) Instruments

Makes, signs, issues, or accepts, or causes to be made, signed, issued, or accepted, any instrument, document, or paper of any kind or description whatsoever without the full amount of tax thereon being duly paid; or

#### (3) Disposal and receipt of stamped packages

In the case of any container which is stamped, branded, or marked (whether or not under authority of law) in such manner as to show that the provisions of the internal revenue laws with respect to the contents or intended contents thereof have been complied with, and which is empty or contains any contents other than contents therein when the container was lawfully stamped, branded, or marked—

(A) Transfers or receives (whether by sale, gift, or otherwise) such container knowing it to be empty or to contain such other contents; or

(B) Stamps, brands, or marks such container, or otherwise produces such a stamped, branded, or marked container, knowing it to be empty or to contain such other contents;

shall be liable for each such offense to a penalty of $50.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 865; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(a)(41), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1830.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pars. (2) to (4). Pub. L. 94–455 redesignated pars. (3) and (4) as (2) and (3), respectively. Former par. (2), which related to persons who manufactured or imported and sold, or offered for sale, or caused to be manufactured or imported and sold, or offered for sale, any playing card, package, or other article without the full amount of tax being paid, was struck out.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–455 effective on first day of first month which begins more than 90 days after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1906(d)(1) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 6013 of this title.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hiking Badlands Back Roads With Your Dog
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TransAlta Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brett Gellner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange   Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all   materials respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the   Company.       |

 

 

 
| /s/   Brett Gellner              |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
|                             |
| Brett   Gellner                  |
| Chief   Financial Officer        |
|                             |
| Dated:  March 2, 2012. |

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id:**

**Series title: Labor force status:**  **Type of data: Age:**  **Years:**

**Year Jan**  **Feb Mar**  **Apr May**  **Jun Jul**  **Aug Sep**  **Oct Nov**  **Dec 2001**  3167 3218 3151 3300 3325 2469 2337 2976 3392 3270 3204 3334 **2002** 3400 3354 3315 3414 3252 2551 2452 2896 3427 3330 3349 3417 **2003** 3350 3295 3385 3504 3276 2656 2601 3051 3466 3355 3295 3434 **2004** 3460 3436 3534 3454 3314 2781 2637 3146 3635 3376 3281 3314 **2005** 3458 3489 3544 3541 3466 2897 2712 2981 3439 3357 3219 3264 **2006** 3387 3312 3329 3537 3411 2792 2661 3049 3452 3350 3424 3417 **2007** 3557 3623 3680 3703 3583 2867 2840 3475 3713 3709 3692 3780 **2008** 3741 3910 3848 3759 3637 3102 2966 3366 3770 3792 3808 3940 **2009** 404540974166 4003 3911 3191 3274 378841954191 4144 4242 **2010** 4370 4297428742474030 3656 3557 37884151 39834034 4220 **2011** 4255432743494378 Not in labor force Number in thousands 18 to 19 years 2001 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value**

LNU05000088 **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 18-19 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 24, 2011 (03:09:37 PM)Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Annual** 3095 3180 3222 3281 3281 3260 3519 3637 3937 4052

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 24, 2011 (03:09:37 PM)
Editorial Note on Part 126
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 126.204 May a HUBZone small business concern have affiliates? ( a ) A HUBZone small business concern may have affiliates, provided that the aggregate size of the concern together with all of its affiliates is small as defined in part 121 of this title, except as otherwise provided for small agricultural cooperatives in § 126.103.
( b ) Employees of affiliates are not automatically considered employees of a HUBZone applicant or HUBZone small business concern solely on the basis of affiliation.
( c ) The employees of an affiliate may be counted as employees of a HUBZone applicant or HUBZone small business concern for purposes of determining compliance with the HUBZone program's principal office and 35% residency requirements in certain circumstances. In determining whether individuals should be counted as employees of a HUBZone applicant or HUBZone small business concern, SBA will consider all information, including criteria used by the IRS for Federal income tax purposes and those set forth in SBA's Size Policy Statement No. 1. Employees of the concern's affiliate will not be counted as the concern's employees if there is a clear line of fracture between the concern and its affiliate. ( 1 ) SBA generally will find that there is a clear line of fracture where the concern demonstrates that it does not share employees, facilities, or equipment with the affiliate; has different customers or lines of business (or is distinctly segregated geographically); and does not receive significant contracts or financial assistance from the affiliate.
( 2 ) The use of common administrative services between parent and/or sister concerns by itself will not result in an affiliate's employees being counted as employees of the HUBZone applicant or HUBZone small business concern.
( 3 ) Minimal business activity between the concern and its affiliate will not result in an affiliate's employees being counted as employees of the HUBZone applicant or HUBZone small business concern. ( i ) *Example to paragraph (c):* X owns 100% of Company A and 51% of Company B. Based on X's common ownership of A and B, the two companies are affiliated under SBA's size regulations. SBA will look at the totality of circumstances to determine whether it would be reasonable to treat the employees of B as employees of A for HUBZone program purposes. If both companies do construction work and share office space and equipment, then SBA would find that there is not a clear line of fracture between the two concerns and would treat the employees of B as employees of A for HUBZone program purposes. In order to be eligible for the HUBZone program, at least 35% of the combined employees of A and B must reside in a HUBZone.
( ii ) [Reserved]
[84 FR 65243, Nov. 26, 2019]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insightful Corporation for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004, the undersigned, Jeffrey Coombs,  President  and Chief
Executive Officer of Insightful Corporation, does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that:

|1) |  | such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, as
amended; and
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2) |  | the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results
of operations of Insightful Corporation.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | May
      17, 2004 | By: | /s/
      Jeffrey E. Coombs                
|----- | ------------------ | --- | -------------------------------------------
|      |                    |     |                                            
|      |                    |     | Jeffrey
      E. Coombs                    
|      |                    |     | President
      and Chief Executive Officer

29

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTexture Modification of the Shuttle Landing Facility Runway at the NASA Kennedy Space CenterThis paper describes the test procedures and the selection criteria used in selecting the best runway surface texture modification at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) to reduce Orbiter tire wear. The new runway surface may ultimately result in an increase of allowable crosswinds for launch and landing operations. The modification allows launch and landing operations in 20-kt crosswinds if desired. This 5-kt increase over the previous 15-kt limit drastically increases landing safety and the ability to make on-time launches to support missions where space station rendezvous is planned.Document ID19970001343Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDaugherty, Robert H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Yager, Thomas J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1996Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberNASA-TM-110269NAS 1.15:110269Accession Number97N11162Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-50-19Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970001343.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3214.22 What must I do if I want to use a letter of credit to back my bond? Your letter of credit must: ( a ) Be issued by a Federally-insured financial institution authorized to do business in the United States;
( b ) Be payable to the Department of the Interior—Bureau of Land Management;
( c ) Be irrevocable during its term and have an initial expiration date of no sooner than 1 year after the date we receive it;
( d ) Be automatically renewable for a period of at least 1 year beyond the end of the current term, unless the issuing financial institution gives us written notice, at least 90 days before the letter of credit expires, that it will no longer renew the letter of credit; and
( e ) Include a clause authorizing the Secretary of the Interior to demand immediate payment, in part or in full: ( i ) If you do not meet your obligations under the requirements of § 3200.4; or
( ii ) Provide substitute security for a letter of credit which the issuer has stated it will not renew before the letter of credit expires.
Slmpllrled lm•slnS Solutlon1 

March 2, 2020 

Dear Dr.Rouvelas, 

We hope this letter finds you well. 

Please note that as per the Practice's Agreement (see attached) with SIS, the 

practice agreed to conduct 350 tests every 12 months - and or pay the monetary 

equivalent. · 

Unfortunately, the practice has completed: 

242 tests from July 2018 through July 2019 (leaving a balance due of 108 tests 

x $219 = $23,652}. 

We ask that this amount due be paid without delay. 

As per item IV of the agreement, the practice has 10 days to cure the breach and 

SIS may elect to suspend services until which time the breach ls cured. 

We are available for discussion regarding this matter and look forward to hearing 

from you in a timely manner. 

Case 0:20-cv-61208-RKA Document 15-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2020 Page 1 of 1
§ 423.34 Sanitation. ( a ) You must not bring or improperly dispose of refuse on Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies. Both the owner and the person bringing or disposing refuse may be issued a citation for violating this provision.
( b ) Campers, picnickers, and all other persons using Reclamation lands must keep their sites free of trash and litter during the period of occupancy and must remove all personal equipment and clean their sites before departure.
( c ) You must not place or construct a toilet or latrine such that its lowest point is lower than the high water mark of any Reclamation waterbody, or within 150 feet horizontally of the high water mark of any Reclamation waterbody.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.:

(Fla. Cir. Ct. Case No. 20-2888 CA 04)

ADACIA DOUGLAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, JACKSON MEMORIAL 

HOSPITAL, JACKSON MEMORIAL 

HOSPITAL SECURITY CORP., ERIK 

NOVO, GETRO EXANTUS, and 

JOAQUIN FUNDORA,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

NOTICE OF REMOVAL

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446, Jackson Memorial Hospital (“JMH”), Erik Novo, 

and Joaquin Fundora (“Defendants”) hereby file this Notice of Removal and remove this action to 

the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, based on the 

facts and provisions set forth below:

1. This case was originally filed in state court on February 7, 2020. 

2. The case alleges violations of Plaintiff’s rights under the Fourth and Sixth 

Amendments. Compl. at 4. This Court has original jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. §§ 1331, and the action is therefore removable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). 

3. JMH was served with the Complaint on March 9, 2020. Erik Novo was served with 

the Complaint on March 11, 2020. Joaquin Fundora was served with the Complaint on March 19, 

Case 1:20-cv-22461-UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 1 of 3
2

2020. It appears that Plaintiff has not yet served the remaining named defendants with the 

Complaint.

4. Venue is proper in this District and Division because the alleged actions took place 

within Miami-Dade County, Florida.

5. This Notice is timely as it has not been more than thirty days since service of the 

Complaint on all named Defendants. 

6. Copies of the pleadings, process and orders from the state court are attached hereto 

as Exhibit A. A Civil Cover Sheet is attached as Exhibit B.

7. Written notice of the removal of this action is being provided to Plaintiff, and a 

copy of this Notice of Removal will be filed with the Clerk of the State Court.

WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that this Court accept and retain removal 

jurisdiction over this action.

Dated: June 15, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

ABIGAIL PRICE-WILLIAMS

Miami-Dade County Attorney

Stephen P. Clark Center

111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 2810

Miami, FL 33128

By: s/ Erica Zaron

Erica S. Zaron, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 0514489

Assistant County Attorney

Telephone: (305) 375-5151

Facsimile: (305) 375-5611

E-mail: zaron@miamidade.gov

Case 1:20-cv-22461-UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent by U.S. Mail on 

June 15, 2020 to all counsel on the below service list.

s/ Erica Zaron

Erica S. Zaron

SERVICE LIST

ADACIA DOUGLAS, Pro Se

1603 N. W. 7th Avenue

Miami, FL 33136

Tel.: (216) 214-4824

Service by U.S. Mail

ERICA S. ZARON, ESQ.

County Attorney’s Office

Stephen P. Clark Center

111 Northwest First Street

Miami, FL 33128-1993

Tel.: (305) 375-5151

Fax: (305) 375-5611

E-Mail: zaron@miamidade.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

No Service

Case 1:20-cv-22461-UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 3 of 3
ex_235409.htm


Exhibit 10.8


 


RESOLUTION OF


 


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (THE “BOARD”)


 


OF

ENTERPRISE DIVERSIFIED, INC. (THE “COMPANY”)


 


Amendment to 2020 Equity Incentive Plan


 


 


WHEREAS, Enterprise Diversified, Inc. approved and adopted the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan on November 7, 2019, primarily to compensate Board members by way of equity incentive awards rather than payments of cash; and


 


WHEREAS, the current Plan states that, subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11, no more than Seventy Thousand (70,000) shares of Common Stock shall be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan (the “Total Share Reserve”).


 


WHEREAS, the Board wishes to authorize the increase to the above Total Share Reserve.


 


NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board approves the following amendment to Section 4.1. of the Company’s 2020 Equity Incentive Plan.


 


 


Amendment to Section 4.1 


 


As adopted by the Board of Directors effective January 31, 2021


 


Section 4.         Shares of Company Common Stock Subject to the Plan.


 


4.1         Subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11, no more than One Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand (135,000) shares of Common Stock shall be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan (the “Total Share Reserve”). Any shares of Common Stock granted in connection with Awards shall be counted against this limit as one (1) share for every one (1) share of Common Stock granted in connection with such Award. During the terms of the Awards, the Company shall keep available at all times the number of shares of Common Stock required to satisfy such Awards.


 


 


 


 


 


* * * * *
**Joint Committee on TaxationMarch 31, 1998JCX-24-98**

**DESCRIPTION OF ACCEPTED AMENDMENTS TO**

**SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN'S MARK RELATING TO**

**REFORM AND RESTRUCTURING OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE**

**AND TAX TECHNICAL CORRECTION PROVISIONS, AS MODIFIED**

----

	The following amendments to the Senate Finance Committee Chairman's Mark Relatingto Reform and Restructuring of the Internal Revenue Service and Tax Technical CorrectionsProvisions, as modified, were adopted by the Committee:

**1.  Include employee representative on IRS Oversight Board**

	The amendment would include on the IRS Oversight Board one individual who is arepresentative of an organization that represents a substantial number of Internal Revenue Serviceemployees and who is appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate.

*Adopted by a roll call vote of 12 ayes to 8 nays.*

	In addition, the amendment would provide clarifying language to ensure that the ethicsrules will not preclude the employee representative from performing his or her duties as an IRSOversight Board member.

*Adopted by voice vote.*

**2.  Include Secretary of the Treasury on IRS Oversight Board**

	The amendment would include the Secretary of Treasury on the IRS Oversight Board.

*Adopted by a roll call vote of 12 ayes to 8 nays.*

**3.  State refund offsets**

	The amendment would permit States to participate in the IRS refund offset program forpast-due, legally enforceable State income tax debts, providing (1) the person making the Federaltax overpayment has shown on the return establishing the overpayment an address that is withinthe State seeking the tax offset and (2) the State seeking the offset has implemented due processprocedures similar to those in the Chairman's Mark.  The offset would apply after the offsetsprovided in present law for internal revenue tax liabilities, past-due support, past-due, legallyenforceable obligations owed a Federal agency, and overpayments of Social Security.  The offsetwould occur before the designation of any refund toward future Federal tax liability.

*Adopted by a roll call vote of 14 ayes to 6 nays.*

**4.  Seizure of principal residence or business as payment option of last resort**

****The amendment would require the IRS to exhaust all other payment options before seizinga business or principal residence.  The modification would not prohibit the seizure of a business ora principal residence, but would treat such seizure as a payment option of last resort.  It isanticipated that the IRS would consider installment agreements, offer-in-compromise, and seizureof other assets of the taxpayer before taking collection action against the taxpayer's business orprincipal residence.   

*Adopted by unanimous consent.*

**5.  Qualifications of Taxpayer Advocate**

	The amendment would provide that, in addition to having a background in customerservice and tax law, the Taxpayer Advocate should have experience representing individualtaxpayers.

*Adopted by unanimous consent.*