alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 0:20-cv-61241-RUIZ

APRIL HICKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER ADOPTING 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The Parties hereby submit for the Court’s entry the proposed order attached hereto as 

Exhibit A reflecting the Parties’ understanding of the Court’s ruling following the trial on liability 

commencing January 24, 2022. Plaintiff’s Counsel approved the content of the proposed order.

Dated: January 28, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: Monica L. Haddad

Monica L. Haddad 

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Florida Bar No. 99426

Email: Monica.Haddad@usdoj.gov

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Southern District of Florida

500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Telephone: (561) 209-1004

Attorney for Defendant, United States of America

Case 0:20-cv-61241-RAR Document 95 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 46.20 How to use this part. ( a ) This part supplements, and is to be used in conjunction with, the CEQ regulations except where it is inconsistent with other statutory requirements. The following table shows the corresponding CEQ regulations for the sections in subparts A—E of this part. Some sections in those subparts do not have a corresponding CEQ regulation. Subpart A 40 CFR 46.10 Parts 1500-1508 46.20 No corresponding CEQ regulation 46.30 No corresponding CEQ regulation Subpart B 46.100 1508.14, 1508.18, 1508.23 46.105 1506.5 46.110 No corresponding CEQ regulation 46.115 1508.7 46.120 1502.9, 1502.20, 1502.21, 1506.3 46.125 1502.22 46.130 1502.14 46.135 1502.21 46.140 1502.20 46.145 No corresponding CEQ regulation 46.150 1506.11 46.155 1502.25, 1506.2 46.160 1506.1 46.170 No corresponding CEQ regulation Subpart C 46.200 1501.2 46.205 1508.4 46.210 1508.4 46.215 1508.4 46.220 1501.5 46.225 1501.6 46.230 1501.6 46.235 1501.7 46.240 1501.8 Subpart D 46.300 1501.3 46.305 1501.7, 1506.6 46.310 1508.9 46.315 No corresponding CEQ regulation 46.320 1506.3 46.325 1501.4 Subpart E 46.400 1502.5 46.405 1502.7 46.415 1502.10 46.420 1502.14 46.425 1502.14 46.430 1502.25 46.435 1503 46.440 1506.2 46.445 1506.8 46.450 1505.2
( b ) The Responsible Official will ensure that the decision making process for proposals subject to this part includes appropriate NEPA review.
( c ) During the decision making process for each proposal subject to this part, the Responsible Official shall consider the relevant NEPA documents, public and agency comments (if any) on those documents, and responses to those comments, as part of consideration of the proposal and, except as specified in paragraphs 46.210(a) through (j), shall include such documents, including supplements, comments, and responses as part of the administrative file.
( d ) The Responsible Official's decision on a proposed action shall be within the range of alternatives discussed in the relevant environmental document. The Responsible Official's decision may combine elements of alternatives discussed in the relevant environmental document if the effects of such combined elements of alternatives are reasonably apparent from the analysis in the relevant environmental document.
( e ) For situations involving an applicant, the Responsible Official should initiate the NEPA process upon acceptance of an application for a proposed Federal action. The Responsible Official must publish or otherwise provide policy information and make staff available to advise potential applicants of studies or other information, such as costs, foreseeably required for later Federal action.
### [§198A. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §221(a)(35), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4042]

Section, added Pub. L. 110–343, div. C, title VII, §707(a), Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3923, related to expensing of qualified disaster expenses. Repeal was executed to this section, which is in part VI of subchapter B of chapter 1, to reflect the probable intent of Congress, notwithstanding directory language of Pub. L. 113–295, which repealed section 198A in part VI of subchapter A of chapter 1.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 19, 2014, subject to a savings provision, see section 221(b) of Pub. L. 113–295, set out as an Effective Date of 2014 Amendment note under section 1 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5090 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5090

To require the Administrator of the Maritime Administration to publicly 
            report cargo preference data on an annual basis.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2022

  Mrs. Fischer (for herself and Mr. Peters) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Maritime Administration to publicly 
            report cargo preference data on an annual basis.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cargo Preference Reporting Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter I of chapter 553 of title 46, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 55306. Annual report on cargo preference data
    ``(a) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) Administrator.--The term `Administrator' means the 
        Administrator of the Maritime Administration.
            ``(2) Cargo preference data.--The term `cargo preference 
        data' means data made available to the Maritime Administration 
        regarding compliance with sections 55302, 55303, 55304, and 
        55305 of this subchapter and section 2631 of title 10, United 
        States Code.
    ``(b) In General.--By March 1 of each fiscal year, the 
Administrator shall prepare, submit to Congress, and make public a 
report regarding the cargo preference data received by the 
Administrator for the preceding fiscal year.
    ``(c) Contents.--Each report submitted under subsection (b) shall 
include, for each Federal department or agency--
            ``(1) the total cargo volume and amount shipped by the 
        department or agency on vessels of the United States for the 
        period of the report; and
            ``(2) the total cargo volume and amount shipped by the 
        department or agency on foreign vessels for such period.
    ``(d) Rulemaking.--The Administrator shall promulgate rules to 
implement this section, which shall clarify how the report will be made 
accessible to the public.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 553 of 
title 46, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 55305 the following:

``Sec. 55306. Annual report on cargo preference data.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



May 13, 2003

The Trustee
Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-70394) of the Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust for the
registration of 3,568,791 trust units of beneficial interest, of our report
dated May 13, 2003 relating to the unaudited condensed interim financial
statements of the Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust that are included in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.




                                               Very truly yours,


                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
### §1927. Counsel's liability for excessive costs

Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 957; Pub. L. 96–349, §3, Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1156.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §829 (R.S. §982).

Word "personally" was inserted upon authority of Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Steiner et al., 1912, 201 F. 63, 119 C.C.A. 401. Reference to "proctor" was omitted as covered by the revised section.

See definition of "court of the United States" in section 451 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–349 substituted judicial authorization to require attorneys to satisfy excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred because of multiplication of proceedings for such prior authority to impose liability for increased costs based on multiplication of proceedings.
Case 9:20-cv-80809-RAR   Document 15-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2020   Page 1 of 6

Case 9:20-cv-80809-RAR   Document 15-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2020   Page 2 of 6

Case 9:20-cv-80809-RAR   Document 15-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2020   Page 3 of 6

Case 9:20-cv-80809-RAR   Document 15-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2020   Page 4 of 6

Case 9:20-cv-80809-RAR   Document 15-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2020   Page 5 of 6

Case 9:20-cv-80809-RAR   Document 15-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2020   Page 6 of 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case Number: 20-22394-CIV-MORENO

EMILIO PINERO, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

STASIO, INC. and KONIG RESTAURANTS 

INTERNATIONAL, L.C., agent of PIZZA 

HUT,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT STASIO, INC.

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 

Without Prejudice Against Defendant Stasio, Inc. Only (D.E. 6), filed on July 2, 2020. It is

ADJUDGED that in light of the notice, the matter is DISMISSED without prejudice as to 

Defendant Stasio, Inc. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 8th of July 2020.

______________________________________

FEDERICO A. MORENO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-22394-FAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 121

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 121.904 When does SBA determine the size status of a business concern?

For compliance with programs of other agencies, SBA will base its size determination on the size of the concern as of the date set forth in the request of the other agency.

[67 FR 13716, Mar. 26, 2002]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60408-60409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22661]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical Trial Type 2 
Diabetes.
    Date: November 4, 2004.
    Time: 3:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., 
Bethesda, MD 20814 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Maxine A. Lesniak, MPH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of 
Health, Room 756, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, 
(301) 594-7792, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d71786e73747c76705d7865696f7c33737479797633737475337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dbb7bea8b5b2bab0b69bbea3afa9baf5b5b2bfbfb0f5b5b2b3f5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 60409]]


    Dated: September 30, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22661 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of the Application of George L. Jaquish, Respondent, for an Order to Punish for Contempt George W. Kelly and Others, Appellants, for Alleged Violation of an Injunction Contained in a Final Judgment Entered in Delaware County Clerk’s Office May 11, 1912, in the Action in the Supreme Court Entitled George L. Jaquish, Plaintiff, v. George W. *927Kelly and Others, Defendants.

Order affirmed, without costs. All concurred, except Kellogg and Woodward, JJ., dissenting.
### [§6074. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–364, title I, §103(a), June 28, 1968, 82 Stat. 260]

Section, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 751; Feb. 26, 1964, Pub. L. 88–272, title I, §122(b), 78 Stat. 27, provided for the time of filing declarations of estimated income tax by corporations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1967, except as provided by section 104 of Pub. L. 90–364, see section 103(f) of Pub. L. 90–364, set out as an Effective Date of 1968 Amendment note under section 243 of this title.
§ 114.105 Who investigates and considers my claim? ( a ) SBA may investigate, or ask another Federal agency to investigate, your claim. SBA also may request any Federal agency to conduct a physical examination of you and provide a report to SBA. SBA will reimburse the Federal agency for the costs of that examination when authorized or required by statute or regulation.
( b ) In those cases in which SBA investigates your claim, and which arise out of the acts or omissions of employees other than employees of the Disaster Assistance Program, the SBA District Counsel in the office with jurisdiction over the site where the action giving rise to the claim occurred will investigate and make recommendations or determination with respect to your claim. In those cases in which SBA investigates your claim, and which arise out of acts or omissions of Disaster Assistance Program employees, the SBA Disaster Area Counsel in the office with jurisdiction over the site where the action giving rise to the claim occurred will investigate and make recommendations or a determination with respect to your claim. The District Counsel, or Disaster Area Counsel, where appropriate, may negotiate with you, and is authorized to use alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, which are nonbinding on SBA, when they may promote the prompt, fair and efficient resolution of your claim.
( c ) If your claim is for $5,000 or less, the District Counsel or Disaster Area Counsel who investigates your claim may deny the claim, or may recommend approval, compromise, or settlement of the claim to the Associate General Counsel for Litigation, who will in such a case take final action.
[61 FR 2401, Jan. 26, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 40283, July 26, 1999]
Ex.
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of China Digital Communication Group (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Jiangcheng Wu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of
                China Digital Communication Group.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







**CHINA
      DIGITAL COMMUNICATION GROUP**





By:
            */s/
                Jiangcheng Wu*JIANGCHENG
                WUChief
                Financial Officer





Date:  March
      30,
      2007
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Wrangell - St Elias
National Park & Preserve
Alaska


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Flying
 **SEE THE PARK BY AIR!**
One of the best ways to experience the beauty and tremendous size of this park is from above! Fly past massive peaks, over jagged glaciers, and endless expanses of wild Alaska! There is a variety of air services available to visitors, including flightseeing excursions and air taxies for backcountry dropoffs for wilderness campers and backpackers. A wide variety of tours, trips, and itineraries are available.
Aviation Safety
**BACKCOUNTRY AIRSTRIPS**
There are three improved airstrips in Wrangell-St. Elias. One, located at McCarthy, is maintained by the State of Alaska. The other two, at May Creek and Chisana, are maintained by the park. Public airport facilities are also located near the park at Gulkana and Chitina. For more information about the improved airstrips in the park, click on the links below.
McCarthy Airstrip *(pdf format 472 KB)*
May Creek Airstrip *(pdf format 528 KB)*
Chisana Airstrip *(pdf format 565 KB)*

View from a bush plane window overlooking the Black Hills, a braided river, and the snow capped mountains beyond.Flight over the Black Hills in the northern area of Wrangell-St. Elias NPS Photo - Matthew Yarbrough
Please contact the park Operations Center and Hangar at (907) 822-7425 for detailed information on specific landing areas.
 Last updated: July 13, 2020
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve
PO Box 439
Mile 106.8 Richardson Highway
Copper Center,
AK
99573
 Phone: 907 822-5234 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
### §7433A. Civil damages for certain unauthorized collection actions by persons performing services under qualified tax collection contracts

#### (a) In general

Subject to the modifications provided by subsection (b), section 7433 shall apply to the acts and omissions of any person performing services under a qualified tax collection contract (as defined in section 6306(b)) to the same extent and in the same manner as if such person were an employee of the Internal Revenue Service.

#### (b) Modifications

For purposes of subsection (a):

(1) Any civil action brought under section 7433 by reason of this section shall be brought against the person who entered into the qualified tax collection contract with the Secretary and shall not be brought against the United States.

(2) Such person and not the United States shall be liable for any damages and costs determined in such civil action.

(3) Such civil action shall not be an exclusive remedy with respect to such person.

(4) Subsections (c), (d)(1), and (e) of section 7433 shall not apply.

(Added Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §881(b)(1), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1626.)
#### § 3863.1-4 Applications for placers containing known lodes.

Applicants for patent to a placer claim, who are also in possession of a known vein or lode included therein, must state in their application that the placer includes such vein or lode. The published and posted notices must also include such statement. If veins or lodes lying within placer locations are owned by other parties, the fact should be distinctly stated in the application for patent and in all the notices. But in all cases whether the lode is claimed or excluded, it must be surveyed and marked upon the plat, the field notes and plat giving the area of the lode claim or claims and the area of the placer separately. An application which omits to claim such known vein or lode must be construed as a conclusive declaration that the applicant has no right of possession to the vein or lode. Where there is no known lode or vein, the fact must appear by the statement of two or more witnesses.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Technical Assistance Request, BP International Limited Request for an Exemption from 10 CFR 20.202 (c)

## HPPOS-268 PDR-9306090293

See the memorandnum from J. E. Glenn to R. J. Pate dated October 8, 1991.

An exemption for the regulations pursuant to 10 CFR 20.203 (c) was granted by license amendment at the request of BP International, a British firm, on the behalf of BP Exploration Company, Anchorage, Alaska. 10 CFR 20.203 (c) requires that dosimetry processors to be accredited by the National Voluntary Accredition Program (NVLAP). The exemption states: "Notwithstanding the requirements of 10 CFR 20.202 (c), the licensee may use personnel dosimetry processed by the United Kingdom National Radiological Protection Board." This health physics position also applies to "new" 10 CFR 20.1501 (c).

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.203, 10 CFR 20.1501

**Subject codes:** 8.1, 12.19

**Applicability:** All

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 30, 2017