alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Response to Questions Concerning Enforcement of 40 CFR 190 "EPA Uranium Fuel Cycle Standard"

## HPPOS-008 PDR-9111210096

See the memorandum from L. B. Higginbotham to A. F. Gibson dated July 29, 1981, and the incoming request from A. F. Gibson dated May 13, 1981. Enclosures to these memos include: (1) a NRR letter to All Power Reactor Licensees dated September 17, 1979, and (2) a copy of the Radioactive Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) 3.11.4. A licensee's commitment to the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) 3.11.4 is acceptable to demonstrate compliance with the EPA Uranium Fuel Cycle Standard, 40 CFR 190.

In a letter dated September 17, 1979, all power reactor licensees were informed of the requirement to comply with 40 CFR 190 as of December 1, 1979. This letter also stated that a licensee commitment to RETS 3.11.4 would be an acceptable method of demonstrating compliance. Licensees were requested to submit that commitment, or an alternative method of compliance. Inspection for compliance with 40 CFR 190 should be made against those commitments for licensees who do not have Technical Specifications covering compliance with 40 CFR 190.

Responses to specific questions concerning inspection for compliance with 10 CFR 40 were as follows:
        -  Qualitative guidance on acceptable calculation methods is provided in NUREG-0543, "Methods for Demonstrating LWR Compliance With the EPA Uranium Fuel Cycle Standard (40 CFR 190)," (February 1980). Since there are no special 40 CFR 190 monitoring requirements, no guidance is needed on this subject. 
        -  No letters or orders will be sent revoking the existing effluent limits. Licensees must comply with 40 CFR 199 in addition to any other "existing limits." 
        -  Compliance with 40 CFR 190 is not based on calendar quarters. As stated in Section 3.11.4 of the RETS, the 40 CFR 190 annual limits apply to any twelve consecutive months. 
        -  Licensees are not expected to have difficulty in complying with 40 CFR 190. Proposed enforcement actions for licensees who cannot demonstrate compliance with 40 CFR 190 should be coordinated with the HQ staff. As indicated in RETS 3.11.4, a licensee whose estimates of doses exceeds the 40 CFR 190 limits, from a condition that has not already been corrected, should request a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 190, at the time the Special Report on exceeding the 40 CFR 190 limits is submitted. A variance will be granted until staff action on the request is completed by NRR. 
        -  No additional monitoring equipment is required, and no "grace period" is needed for procurement or installation of such equipment. 
        -  The use of Regulatory Guides 1.109-1.113 may result in calculated doses that are too conservative for determining compliance with 40 CFR 190. See NUREG-0543 for a discussion of this point. 

**Regulatory references:**40 CFR 190, Technical Specifications

**Subject codes:** 7.3, 9.0, 12.12

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 02, 2017
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wells Real Estate Fund VII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F.
Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the
Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS,
III                                
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief
Executive Officer August 8, 2003



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                
|Douglas P. Williams Chief
Financial Officer August 8, 2003
### §509A. National Security Division

(a) There is a National Security Division of the Department of Justice.

(b) The National Security Division shall consist of the elements of the Department of Justice (other than the Federal Bureau of Investigation) engaged primarily in support of the intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States Government, including the following:

(1) The Assistant Attorney General designated as the Assistant Attorney General for National Security under section 507A of this title.

(2) The Office of Intelligence Policy and Review (or any successor organization).

(3) The counterterrorism section (or any successor organization).

(4) The counterespionage section (or any successor organization).

(5) Any other element, component, or office designated by the Attorney General.

(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title V, §506(b)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 248.)
### [§6683. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–135, title IV, §403(n)(3)(A), Dec. 21, 2005, 119 Stat. 2626]

Section, added Pub. L. 89–809, title I, §104(h)(4)(A), Nov. 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 1560; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 105–34, title XII, §1281(c), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1037, related to failure of foreign corporation to file return of personal holding company tax.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective as if included in the provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108–357, to which it relates, see section 403(nn) of Pub. L. 109–135, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 26 of this title.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Presidents





Contact Us
  What We Do
 The National Park Service preserves and protects historic places across the United States and tells the stories of the people who helped shape our country. Within the National Park Service, many people work in historic preservation: archeologists, architects, curators, historians, landscape architects, and other cultural resource professionals.
The National Park Service carries out historic preservation both inside and outside the National Park System: Designation of historic sites including those on the National Register of Historic Places
Written, photographic, and technical documentation as well as oral histories
Physical preservation such as stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction
Preservation of thousands of objects in museum collections across the country
 Stories Sort By:RelevanceRecently UpdatedDate ReleasedTitle
 Show1040 per page
   presidents nps careers research science publications grants resource management partnerships historic preservation success stories
 Last updated: February 14, 2017
 Tools Calendar
Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### § 107.700 Compliance with size standards in part 121 of this chapter as a condition of Assistance.

You are permitted to provide financial assistance and management services only to a Small Business. To determine whether an applicant is a Small Business, you may use either the financial size standards in § 121.301(c)(2) of this chapter or the industry standard covering the industry in which the applicant is primarily engaged, as set forth in § 121.301(c)(1) of this chapter.

[61 FR 3189, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 33915, July 14, 2009]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Public Meeting, Davy Crockett National Forest Resource 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self 
Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. No. 106-393) and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Forest Service, Davy Crockett National Forest Resource 
Advisory Committee (RAC) meeting will meet on November 4, 2004.

DATES: The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC meeting will be held on 
November 4, 2004.

ADDRESSES: The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC meeting will be held 
at the Davy Crockett Ranger Station located on State Highway 7, 
approximately one-quarter mile west of FM 227 in Houston County, Texas. 
The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 9 p.m. A 
public comment period will be at 8:45 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raoul Gagne, District Ranger, Davy 
Crockett National Forest, Rt. 1, Box 55 FS, Kennard, Texas 75847: 
Telephone: 936-655-2299 or e-mail at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20524741474e456046530e4645440e5553"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="55273234323b301533267b3330317b2026">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Davy Crockett National Forest RAC 
proposes projects and funding to the Secretary of Agriculture under 
section 203 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self 
Determination Act of 2000. The purpose of the November 4, 2004 meeting 
is to review and approve project proposals to submit to the Forest 
Supervisor for National Forests and Grasslands in Texas. These meetings 
are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the 
RAC. Each formal RAC meeting will also have time, as identified above, 
allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of 
persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual 
oral comments may be limited.

    Dated: October 7, 2004.
Raoul W. Gagne,
Designated Federal Officer, Davy Crockett National Forest RAC.
[FR Doc. 04-23019 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 3901.10 Land descriptions. ( a ) All lands in an oil shale lease must be described by the legal subdivisions of the public land survey system or if the lands are unsurveyed, the legal description by metes and bounds.
( b ) Unsurveyed lands will be surveyed, at the cost of the lease applicant, by a surveyor approved or employed by the BLM.
| 1.   | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Trust Certificates (TRUCs), Series 2001-2 Trust; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the trust agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and the trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                           |   |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | By:  /s/ Anthony J. Horan                 |   |
|   |   |   | Name: Anthony J. Horan                    |   |
|   |   |   | Title:  Chief Executive Officer/President |   |
|   |   |   | Bear Stearns Depositor Inc.                    |   |
|   |   |   | Date:  March 30, 2011                     |   |
|   |   |   |                                           |   |
|   |   |   |                                           |   |

----
### §1912. Damages and costs on affirmance

Where a judgment is affirmed by the Supreme Court or a court of appeals, the court in its discretion may adjudge to the prevailing party just damages for his delay, and single or double costs.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 954.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §878, and section 1141(c)(4) of title 26 U.S.C., 1940 ed., Internal Revenue Code (R.S. §1010; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§117, 289, 36 Stat. 1131, 1167; Feb. 10, 1939, ch. 2, §1141(c)(4), 53 Stat. 165).

Section consolidates section 878 of title 28 with section 1141(c)(4) of title 26, both U.S.C., 1940 ed., with changes in phraseology necessary to effect consolidation.

Words "prevailing party" were substituted for "the respondents in error," contained in said section 878 of title 28, since writs of error have been abolished.

#### Senate Revision Amendment

By Senate amendment, all provisions relating to the Tax Court were eliminated. Therefore, section 1141(c)(4) of Title 26, U.S.C., Internal Revenue Code, was not one of the sources of this section as finally enacted. However, no change in the text of this section was necessary. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
#### Thomas Shinnick v. Clover Farms Company.

Motion for stay granted. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-2821

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Bruce Robert Nelson, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 24, 2003

Filed: February 3, 2003

___________

Before BYE, FAGG, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Robert Nelson, an inmate now in the custody of the State of Minnesota,

pleaded guilty to a federal charge of conspiring to distribute methamphetamine and

marijuana. In January 2002, the federal district court sentenced Nelson to 93 months

imprisonment, to run concurrently with his state sentence. Nelson later filed a motion

asking the district court to credit his federal sentence for 210 days he spent in federal

custody between June 2001 and January. The district court denied the motion, stating

Nelson could not receive this credit against his federal sentence because he

presumably received the credit towards his state sentence. 
-2-

On appeal, Nelson contends he was entitled to the jail credit and, in the

alternative, he should be allowed to pursue the case "administratively." The

government has moved to supplement the appellate record with sentence-computation

documents and asserts that Nelson failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with

the Bureau of Prison (BOP). We grant the government's motion and, having carefully

reviewed the record, affirm the district court.

The district court did not commit error in denying the jail-credit motion,

because Nelson tacitly concedes he did not first exhaust his administrative remedies.

See United States v. Chappel, 208 F.3d 1069, 1069 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam).

Nevertheless, we modify the district court's order to be without prejudice so Nelson,

after exhausting his BOP remedies, has the opportunity to pursue his claim for jail

credit. See id. at 1069-70.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Trust Certificates (TRUCs), Series 2001-2 Trust; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the trust agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and the trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:  /s/ Anthony J. Horan      Name:   Anthony J. HoranTitle:   Chief Executive Officer/President,Bear Stearns Depositor Inc.Date:     March 30, 2010 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
### §589. Staff and other employees

The United States trustee may employ staff and other employees on approval of the Attorney General.

(Added Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §224(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2664.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 408(c) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, which provided for the repeal of this section and the deletion of any references to United States Trustees in this title at a prospective date, was repealed by section 307(b) of Pub. L. 99–554. See note set out preceding section 581 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Temporary Suspension of Limitation on Appointments

Pub. L. 99–554, title I, §114(b), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3093, provided that: "During the period beginning on the effective date of this Act [see section 302 of Pub. L. 99–554, set out in an Effective Date of 1986 Amendment; Transition and Administrative Provisions note under section 581 of this title] and ending on October 1, 1989, the provisions of title 5 of the United States Code governing appointments in the competitive service shall not apply with respect to appointments under section 589 of title 28, United States Code."