alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### [§§6659 to 6661. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7721(c)(2), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2399]

Section 6659, added Pub. L. 97–34, title VII, §722(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 341; amended Pub. L. 97–448, title I, §107(a)(1), (2), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2391; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §155(c)(1), title VII, §721(x)(4), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 693, 971, related to additions to tax in case of valuation overstatements for purposes of the income tax.

A prior section 6659 was renumbered section 6662 of this title.

Section 6659A, added Pub. L. 99–514, title XI, §1138(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2486, related to additions to tax in case of overstatements of pension liabilities.

Section 6660, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §155(c)(2)(A), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 694; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §§1811(d), 1899A(57), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2833, 2961, related to additions to tax in case of valuation understatements for purposes of estate or gift taxes.

A prior section 6660 was renumbered section 6662 of this title.

Section 6661, added Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §323(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 613; amended Pub. L. 97–354, §5(a)(42), Oct. 19, 1982, 96 Stat. 1697; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title VII, §714(h)(3), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 962; Pub. L. 99–509, title VIII, §8002(a), (c), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1951; Pub. L. 99–514, title XV, §1504(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2743, related to substantial understatements of liability.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to returns the due date for which (determined without regard to extensions) is after Dec. 31, 1989, see section 7721(d) of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as an Effective Date of 1989 Amendment note under section 461 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 121

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 121 appear at 72 FR 50039 and 50040, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 121.305 What size eligibility requirements exist for obtaining financial assistance relating to particular procurements?

A concern qualified as small for a particular procurement, including an 8(a) subcontract, is small for financial assistance directly and primarily relating to the performance of the particular procurement.
#### Victoria Sand Company, Appellant, v. Empire Limestone Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held: 1. That the damages awarded upon the plaintiff’s second cause of action are not shown to be inadequate, even if the jury found the contract to be as therein alleged, it appearing that there was an available market for the undelivered sand and no proof that as much could not be realized therefor in the market as the contract price. 2. That a sufficient consideration was shown to support the contract set forth in the defendant’s counterclaim. All concurred.
### §7432. Civil damages for failure to release lien

#### (a) In general

If any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service knowingly, or by reason of negligence, fails to release a lien under section 6325 on property of the taxpayer, such taxpayer may bring a civil action for damages against the United States in a district court of the United States.

#### (b) Damages

In any action brought under subsection (a), upon a finding of liability on the part of the defendant, the defendant shall be liable to the plaintiff in an amount equal to the sum of—

(1) actual, direct economic damages sustained by the plaintiff which, but for the actions of the defendant, would not have been sustained, plus

(2) the costs of the action.

#### (c) Payment authority

Claims pursuant to this section shall be payable out of funds appropriated under section 1304 of title 31, United States Code.

#### (d) Limitations

#### (1) Requirement that administrative remedies be exhausted

A judgment for damages shall not be awarded under subsection (b) unless the court determines that the plaintiff has exhausted the administrative remedies available to such plaintiff within the Internal Revenue Service.

#### (2) Mitigation of damages

The amount of damages awarded under subsection (b)(1) shall be reduced by the amount of such damages which could have reasonably been mitigated by the plaintiff.

#### (3) Period for bringing action

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an action to enforce liability created under this section may be brought without regard to the amount in controversy and may be brought only within 2 years after the date the right of action accrues.

#### (e) Notice of failure to release lien

The Secretary shall by regulation prescribe reasonable procedures for a taxpayer to notify the Secretary of the failure to release a lien under section 6325 on property of the taxpayer.

(Added Pub. L. 100–647, title VI, §6240(a), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3746.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7432 was renumbered 7437 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 100–647, title VI, §6240(c), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3747, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall apply to notices provided by the taxpayer of the failure to release a lien, and damages arising, after December 31, 1988."
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2002 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.342

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 133870 dated September 08, 2015

 

For Rendering

 

Telematic services

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

Promsvyaz-Invest (Zelenaya Tochka Group)

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1124823007847

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

4826082163

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

9, Kommunalnaya sq., Lipetsk, Lipetsk region, 398059

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until September 08, 2020.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated July 21, 2015 No. 469-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 070647
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLidar cloud studies for FIRE and ECLIPSOptical remote sensing measurements of cirrus cloud properties were collected by one airborne and four ground-based lidar systems over a 32 h period during this case study from the First ISCCP (International Satellite Cloud Climatology Program) Regional Experiment (FIRE) Intensive Field Observation (IFO) program. The lidar systems were variously equipped to collect linear depolarization, intrinsically calibrated backscatter, and Doppler velocity information. Data presented describe the temporal evolution and spatial distribution of cirrus clouds over an area encompassing southern and central Wisconsin. The cirrus cloud types include: dissipating subvisual and thin fibrous cirrus cloud bands, an isolated mesoscale uncinus complex (MUC), a large-scale deep cloud that developed into an organized cirrus structure within the lidar array, and a series of intensifying mesoscale cirrus cloud masses. Although the cirrus frequently developed in the vertical from particle fall-streaks emanating from generating regions at or near cloud tops, glaciating supercooled (-30 to -35 C) altocumulus clouds contributed to the production of ice mass at the base of the deep cirrus cloud, apparently even through riming, and other mechanisms involving evaporation, wave motions, and radiative effects are indicated. The generating regions ranged in scale from approximately 1.0 km cirrus uncinus cells, to organized MUC structures up to approximately 120 km across.Document ID19900018898Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSassen, Kenneth*(Utah Univ. Salt Lake City., United States)*Grund, Christian J.*(Wisconsin Univ. Madison., United States)*Spinhirne, James D.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD., United States)*Hardesty, Michael*(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Boulder, CO., United States)*Alvarez, James*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 6, 1990Subject CategoryGeophysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186384NASA-CR-186384Accession Number90N28214Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-868Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900018898.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

NGUYEN VU,

Petitioner

v.

JUDGE SANDY L.V. BYRD, PRESIDENT 

JUDGE SHEILA A. WOODS-SKIPPER 

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 106 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2018, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition and the Motion for 

a Stay are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of the judges 

from the caption.
```

                                                                                          EXHIBIT 32

                        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Advanced  Lumitech,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Patrick Planche, President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
         financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Patrick Planche
----------------------------------------
Patrick Planche, President,
Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2005

                                                 E-2
```

----
§ 107.560 Subordination of SBA's creditor position. ( a ) *Debentures purchased or guaranteed on or before July 1, 1991.* Under the terms of any Debenture purchased or guaranteed by SBA on or before July 1, 1991, SBA's unsecured claims against you, as a Debenture-holder or as subrogee, are subordinated in favor of all your other creditors, except to the extent that such claims may be subject to equitable subordination in SBA's favor.
( b ) *Debentures purchased or guaranteed after July 1, 1991, including refinancings of Debentures previously purchased or guaranteed.* ( 1 ) Under the terms of any Debenture purchased or guaranteed by SBA after July 1, 1991, SBA's unsecured claims against you, as a Debenture-holder or as subrogee, are subordinated only in favor of non-Associate lenders; and, to the extent that your indebtedness to such lenders exceeds the lesser of $10,000,000 or 200 percent of your Regulatory Capital (determined as of the date your Debentures were purchased or guaranteed), SBA's unsecured claims enjoy parity with those of other unsecured creditors, except with respect to indebtedness created on or before July 1, 1991.
( 2 ) In order to induce others to lend you money after your Debenture has been purchased or guaranteed, SBA may agree in writing on a case-by-case basis to subordinate its unsecured claims, on such terms as it may determine, in favor of one or more of your Associates, or in favor of other lenders in excess of the amounts mentioned in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) SBA reserves the authority to refuse to subordinate its claims if it determines, at the time you request your Debenture be purchased or guaranteed, that the exercise of reasonable investment prudence and your financial condition warrant such refusal.
§ 4.480 Conditions of decision action. ( a ) *Record as basis of decision; definition of record.* No decision shall be rendered except on consideration of the whole record or such portions thereof as may be cited by any party or by the State Director and as supported by and in accordance with the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence. The transcript of testimony and exhibits, together with all documents and requests filed in the proceedings, shall constitute the exclusive record for decision.
( b ) *Effect of substantial compliance.* No adjudication of grazing preference will be set aside on appeal, if it appears that it is reasonable and that it represents a substantial compliance with the provisions of part 4100 of this title.
[44 FR 41790, July 18, 1979. Redesignated at 68 FR 68770, Dec. 10, 2003 as amended at 88 FR 5794, Jan. 30, 2023]
```

[109th Congress Public Law 32]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ032.109]

[[Page 119 STAT. 375]]

Public Law 109-32
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 695 Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, as the ``Honorable 
   Judge George N. Leighton Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 12, 
                         2005 -  [H.R. 1542]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 695 
Pleasant Street in New Bedford, Massachusetts, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Honorable Judge George N. Leighton Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Honorable Judge George N. 
Leighton Post Office Building''.

    Approved July 12, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1542:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            May 4, considered and passed House.
            June 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 480 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 

deduction for qualified business income. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2021 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, and 

Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the deduction for qualified business income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Main Street Tax Cer5 tainty Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED BUSINESS INCOME 

7 MADE PERMANENT. 

8 Section 199A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

9 is amended by striking subsection (i). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Maintenance & Inspection Manual

DJI Inspire 1

Supplemental to Section 333 Exemption Request | John Walrond | Aug 10, 2015

DATE EVENT DISCREPANCY ACTION RESOLUTION

00/00/0000 Aircraft tipped over on landing 2 propellers damaged Propellers replaced by JW Returned to service

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

Page 1 of 1 Section 333 Exemption Request – Maintenance & Inspection Manual | John Walrond| Aug 10, 2015
During your first days as an NRC employee, you will be required to complete a number of forms, actions 

and plans designed to ensure your successful entry into the NRC workforce. This forms matrix is provided 

as a quick reference tool.

Adobe Acrobat PDF Image 

Screen Fillable Adobe Acrobat (Use only with Adobe 

Reader 5.0 and above; the Adobe Reader is available free 

from Adobe.com) If there is a problem opening an Adobe 

file through the internet browser, please try this: Using the 

RIGHT button on the mouse, click on the PDF/F icon and 

select "Save target as" from the resulting menu. Save the 

form file to a hard drive or a local network drive. Then 

open the file using Adobe Reader 5.0 or above. Using this 

method, avoids opening the file through the internet 

browser.

 

Your Pay

FMS - 2231 Direct Deposit Sign-Up      

SF-1152 Unpaid Compensation - Designation of 

Beneficiary      

Your Benefits

Premium Conversion 

Waiver/Election Form 

This form is used to waive pre-tax 

treatment of employee premium 

contributions to the FEHB program. 

Complete this form only if you do not want 

the pre-tax health benefit. Pre-tax 

treatment is automatic.

  

SF2809 Health Benefits Election form     

SF-3102 Federal Employees' Retirement System 

(FERS) Designation of Beneficiary   

TSP-60 Rollover Qualified Retirement Savings 

(e.g. 401K)   

SF-2817 Federal Employee's Group Life Insurance 

(FEGLI) Enrollment Form   

SF-2823 FEGLI Beneficiary Form   

TSP-1 TSP Enrollment Form   

TSP-3 TSP Change of Beneficiary Form   

Employment Forms

SF-256 Self Identification of Handicap      

OF-306 Declaration of Federal Employment      

SF-181 Race and National Origin Identification      

SF-144 Statement of Prior Federal Service      

I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification      

W-4 Employee Withholding Allowance      
Maryland Withholding 

Exemption Certificate 

Maryland Withholding Exemption 

Certificate

Virginia Withholding 

Exemption Certificate 

Virginia Withholding Exemption 

Certificate

West Virginia 

Withholding 

Exemption Certificate 

West Virginia Withholding Exemption 

Certificate

District of Columbia 

Withholding 

Exemption Certificate 

District of Columbia Withholding 

Exemption Certificate

FTA State Tax Forms State Tax Forms
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tien Thang NGUYEN, also known as Cody, also known as Tien Thanh Nguyen, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-31019.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 13, 2006.

Michael W. Magner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, William P. Gibbens, U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Harold P. Dueloux, III, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed except with respect to the order to pay restitution.

It is clear that the district court has the authority to order, as a condition of supervised release, that the defendant pay unpaid restitution ordered as a part of a sentence imposed by another court. *See United States v. Love,*431 F.3d 477 (5th Cir.2005) (relying on the “catch-all” provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) allowing “any other condition [the district court] considers appropriate”). This discretionary authority does not, however, allow the district court to alter the restitution order of that other court, or to make a separate and independent order of restitution. *See Love,*431 F.3d at 482-83 (noting that critical to its holding was the fact that the district court had not made a separate order of restitution but merely ordered Love to pay previously ordered restitution).

The order of restitution is therefore vacated, and the case is remanded to allow the district court to conform its order with the state court order of restitution. All other conditions of the supervised release and all other terms of the judgment are affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.