NATL INST OF STAND S TECH

AlllOt, T77flD7

Nisr

NI8T

PUBLICATIONS

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce

NIST Technical Note 1544

NIST Technical Note 1544

TEM Horn Antenna Design Principles

Chriss A. Grosvenor

Robert T. Johnk

David R. Novotny

Seturnino Canales

Benjamin Davis

Jason Veneman

Electromagnetics Division

National Institute of Standards and Technology

325 Broadway

Boulder, CO 80305

January 2007

3^ s,a ^

""^ATBS O^

'^

U.S. Department of Commerce

Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary

Technology Administration

Robert C. Cresanti, Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology

National Institute of Standards and Technology

William A. Jeffrey, Director
Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be

identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the

National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment

are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note 1544

Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Tech. Note 1544, 74 pages (January 2007)

CODEN: NTNOEF

U.S. Government Printing Office

Washington: 2007

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet bookstore; gpo.gov Phone: 202-512-1800 Fax: 202-512-2250

Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001
Contents

1

.

Introduction and Background 1

2. TEM Horn Antenna Design 2

2.

1

Basic TEM Horn Antenna Design Principles 4

2.1.1 TEM Horn Antenna Properties 4

2. 1 .2 TEM Horn Characteristics 6

2.2 1 .2 m TEM Horn Antenna Design 8

2.2. 1 Balun for the 1 .2 m TEM Horn Antenna 9

2.2.2 1 .2 m TEM Resistive Taper Design 11

2.3 36 cm TEM Full-Horn Antenna with Ground Plane 16

2.3.1 36 cm TEM Full-Horn Antenna Balun 16

2.4 36 cm TEM Half-Horn Antenna 20

2.4.

1

36 cm TEM Half-Horn Antenna Feed-Point for Impedance Matching 22

2.4.2 36 cm TEM Horn Antenna - Cloth Resistive Taper 23

2.5 Horn-to-Hom Responses and Measured Antenna Factors 29

3. Antenna Numerical Design 31

3.1 Numerically Modeled and Measured 1 .2 m TEM Horn Antenna Patterns . 3

1

3.2 36 cm TEM Full-Horn Numerical Modeling 36

3.3 TEM Half-Horn Numerical Design 44

4. TEM Horn Antenna Applications 53

4.

1

Building-Material Measurements by Use of TEM Horn Antennas 53

4.2 Aircraft Measurements 59

4.3 RF Absorber Measurements 63

4.4 Shelter Evaluations 65

4.5 EMC Compliance Chamber Testing 67

4.6 Conducted and Radiated UWB Emissions 70

5. Conclusions 70

6. Acknowledgments 70

7. References 71

111

TEM Horn Antenna Design Principles

Chriss A. Grosvenor, Robert T. Johnk, David R. Novotny, Setumino Canales, Benjamin

Davis, and Jason Veneman

Electromagnetics Division

National Institute of Standards and Technology

325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305

The National Institute ofStandards and Technology has developed several ultrawideband, TEM

horn antennas with phase linearity, short impulse duration, and a near-constant antenna factor. They are used as time-domain antennas for measuring impulsive fields with minimal distortion. The listed characteristics make TEM horn antennas ideal for separating events m the time

domain. This time-domain separation allows for an accurate response from nearby scattering

objects or representation ofcomphcated antenna patterns orfrequency responses from sources. This report describes the development ofeach antenna, their characteristics, plus numerical

modeling applied to each antenna to study various aspects ofdesign, and various measurement

applications ofthese antennas. Applications include site attenuation measurements, chamber

evaluations, radar imaging studies, and aircraft shielding evaluations. This report is intended

for those who wish to construct these types ofbroadband antennas or to use the technology

developed at NIST.

Keywords: antennas; antenna design; antenna measurements; numerical modeling; TEM horn

antennas

1. Introduction and Background

Certain antennas on the market today are used for electromagnetic compatibihty

measurements such as radiated immunity and emissions testing. These are designed to cover a

broad frequency spectrum while maintaining specified directional properties. However, trying to meet both criteria leads to distortion either in the phase or amplitude properties of the incoming

signal. Designing an antenna with desired qualities in the time-domain will translate to an

anterma with a broadband response in the frequency domain. A well-designed tune-domain

antenna should accurately reproduce the time waveform of the incoming field, thus preserving the

amplitude and phase of the incoming signal [1-4] To provide desirable time-domain fidelity, an

antenna must have both a constant amplitude response and a linear phase response in the

frequency domain. Applications for which this characteristic is important include electromagnetic

compatibility (EMC) facility evaluations [5], site attenuation measurements to determine ambient

loss [6], room imaging studies [7] and shielding effectiveness studies on aircraft [8, 9]. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been designing

transverse electromagnetic (TEM) horn antennas for over 30 years 1 10| Desirable design
characteristics of time-domain TEM horn antennas include constant amplitude, linear phase, and

high sensitivity to fields in both the time and frequency domains. The TEM horn antenna is

designed to introduce minimal waveform distortion by allowing the fields within the structure to

remain in the dominant transverse electromagnetic mode. By designing these antennas

specificalh for use with impulsive time-domain signals and having a broad frequency spectrum,

time-domain distortion can be minimized [11, 12].

This technical report will discuss the design, construction, measurement and application

of several TEM horn antennas. Four sections describe in detail three TEM horn antennas

currenth used by NIST: ( 1) a 1 .2 m length TEM full-horn antenna, (2) a 36 cm TEM fiill-hom

antenna, and (3) a 36 cm TEM half-horn antenna. The physical dimensions of the antenna, the

impedance matching into and out of the antenna structure, and the design equations will be

discussed in Section 2. Section 3 discusses the various uses of numerical-design packages,

specifically, the finite-element method, to better understand the patterns and behavior of the

electromagnetic fields associated with these antennas. The effect of finite ground-plane

dimensions on the pattern is described. Section 4 addresses various applications of our antennas

in field-test situations.
2, TEMHorn Antenna Design

A TEM horn antenna provides minimum-duration response to impulsive input or output fields

and is able to discriminate between events occurring in the time domain. This is done by limiting

the amount of propagation moding in the antenna and by having a good impedance match design

both at the feed-point to the anteima and at the aperture of the antenna. Inside the antenna, the

fields should remain in the dominant mode, which for our antenna is the TEM mode. In other

antennas, such as the log-periodic antenna, the spiral antenna, or the pyramidal horn antenna,

phase dispersion occurs as the wave propagates along each of the elements, resulting in a greatly

extended antenna response time to the fields. This is shown in the time-domain plot of Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 shows the impulse response of the TEM horn anteima to the input waveform of

an impulse generator for a waveform having a pulse width of approximately 300 ps. The TEM

horn response time is on the order of a few nanoseconds. We can see that the TEM-hom antenna

can accurately reproduce the incoming response of the surrounding environment and can resolve

scattering events on the order of approximately 5 ns. The impulse response of a log-periodic

antenna is shown in Figure 2, and is on the order of 40 ns. In this case, if we were trying to

12 —

:

08 —

0.4

.ti

-0.4

-0 8 —

20 40 n

'—\

'

I 60 80 100 Time (ns)

Figure 1. Time-domain response of TEM horn antenna to an applied impulsixc elcctrie field (private communication. Arthur Ondrejka.).
|^Hi|iymWMp«iirtmf^r»^<li»<

Figure 2. Time-domain response ot log-periodic antenna to an impulsive electric field (private communication. Arthur Ondrejka.)-

localize two events that are 10 ns apart, say reflections from the walls of a chamber, then the

TEM horn antenna can discriminate between these events, but the log-periodic antenna cannot. The linear phase response of a TEM horn occurs because the antenna elements maintain the

proper field and current relationships, by means of correct width and height ratios. This constantimpedance propert) is a key design criterion for TEM horn antennas. In order to illustrate the

linear-phase property, we measured the transmission for two 1 .2 m TEM horn antennas at various

separation distances and plotted the unwrapped linear phase as shown in Figures 3 and 4. Figure

3 is the unwrapped phase response over the useable bandwidth of the antenna, and Figure 4 is the

unwrapped phase response over a smaller frequency bandwidth shown to reveal detail.

2.1 Basic TEM Horn Antenna Design Principles

2.1.1 TEMHorn Antenna Properties

Figure 5 shows a general drawing of a TEM horn antenna [13. 14]. The width w and

height h determine the impedance of the antenna, and a constant wlh ratio maintains constant

impedance. The balun is used to convert input unbalanced electrical signals to balanced electrical

signals in the antenna, and the resistive taper is used to reduce reflections from the end of the

TEM horn section. The following sections describe the design of each part of this antenna.
-4000

3 -8000

-12000 Phase Ti 5 ni Phase (u- I m

Phase @ 15m

Phase (2) 2 0m

Phase '« 2 5 m

-16000

400 800 1200

I'reciucMcv (MHz)

1600 2000

Figure 3. Unwrapped linear-phase response of 1.2 m TEM horn antenna over entire usable bandwidth and at various antenna separations.

-400

- -800

1200

-1600

Phase iS I 5 m

Phase @ 2.0 m

Phase (S 2 5 m

-2000

100 120 140 160

I roqiiciic> (Ml!/

ISO 200

Figure 4. Unwrapped linear-phase response of 1.2 m IHM horn antenna over smaller frequenc\ range and various antenna separations.
TEM Horn

Section

rOptional

Resistive Taper ^

Figure 5. General design for TEM horn antenna.

2.1.2 TEM Horn Characteristics

In this subsection, we discuss how to design for phase linearity and constant amplitude

and how to maximize bandwidth. As mentioned previously, the TEM horn antenna will show

phase dispersion if the tnangular elements (TEM horn Section, Figure 5) are not designed

correctly. Triangular elements allow current path extremes along the structure, one directly down

the center of the element, and the other along the edge. The edge path is obviously the longer,

and currents on this path will be delayed. If the delay is large enough, the two signals will arrive

at the output 180" out of phase, resulting in a strong reduction in output signal. This phase effect

is easy to diagnose since it affects the amplitude response. Usually this will only be a problem

onh if the triangle is very wide across the aperture compared to its length. An equilateral triangle

is as short as practical, but not recommended. Normally our antennas are several times longer

than they are wide, and so this phase problem does not occur. Another reason why TEM horn

antennas maintain good phase linearity is that the currents in the conductors are moving in the same direction as the electric fields. This is not true in the case of other antennas, such as dipole

antennas [15, 16], A short dipole also maintains linear phase response, but for a different reason;

the currents in the structure, although perpendicular to the field, have only a short distance to

flow, and therefore respond without delay to the input fields. However, a long dipole [17] does

have a noticeable phase problem, because the currents require a significant time to flow down the

dipole. and the\ flow in a direction perpendicular to that of the electric field. As a result, the

impulse response of a long dipole is greatly extended, resembling a square wave, and having a

repetition frequency equal to the resonant frequency of the dipole.
Three conditions must be satisfied for a TEM horn antenna to have constant-amplitude

response (see Figure 5): (1) the impedance of the antenna/balun must be matched to that of the

receiver, (2) the input impedance must be matched to the antenna's internal impedance, and (3)

the input and output coupling ot the antenna must minimize resonances and multiple reflections. The amplitude response or antenna factor gives us an indication of the sensitivit}' of an antenna's

response to various frequencies across this bandwidth. Figure 6 shows the amplitude response tor

various antennas, including the f2 m TEM horn antenna developed by NIST. The antenna factor

(AF) is given by

AFidB) = 20 • log

E

^

incident

V VV received J

(1)

where the electric field is typically measured at a distance of 1 m. Most of the antennas shown

are sensitive to the fields over only a few hundred megahertz (MHz), but the TEM horn antenna

factor is constant from approximately 30 MHz to 1500 MHz.

Research has shown that an input voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) of less than 1.2

yields the best impedance match. The components of interest are the input coaxial cable, the

balun, the antenna, and the resistive termination. The balun and the resistive termination will be

40

30

CQa

o

a 20

o

^^~ On

10

(9

4> h

200

O

^ o

'4

TT

ix

o-

^

%^

0' ^ ^

ix

^^^ o

::t

1 \- Tuned Dipole O O O Log-Periodic Dipole Antenna (I, PDA)

G—G—O Biconical

sV ii Conical Log Spiral -4 * Hybrid

1.2 m TEM horn antenna

400 600

Frequency, (MHz)

800 1 000

Figure 6. Antenna factors for various antenna t\"pes.

(Data used with pcmiission from ARA Tcchniilogics. Ine 1 1S|)
discussed in later sections, but to achieve a constant antenna factor within the antenna, impedance

must be held constant. The NIST TEM horn antermas are designed as parallel plate transmission

lines, with a gradual, constant-impedance, tapered transition from the feed-point/coaxial air line

at one end, to the aperture dimension of its output at the other end. The impedance of a parallel

plate transmission line is a function of the ratio of the width w of the conductive elements to the

spacing bet^veen the elements h (height). The width to height ratio, wlh, is kept constant by

making the elements narrower m proportion to the decrease in spacing. This impedance can be

calculated with the microstrip equations of Gardiol or Gupta [19-21]:

Z,, =^-59.95 -in

^8/2 w ^ +

which is true for <wlh <1. i.e.. for antenna impedances greater than 252 Q.. The relative

dielectric constant is equal to that of Styrofoam (^r^ 1.05). For antennas with impedances

between 58.4 Q. and 252 Q. or 1 < wlh < 10, we use the following equation:

2 376.69

(2)

Z, ^/ + 2.42-0.44-^+1-, , I, Vw'

,r

(3)

We used this equation to design an anterma with 50 D impedance, and it worked ver\' well even

though eq. (3) was not valid for this impedance value. We note that the equation, as given by

Gardiol [20], is used to calculate the impedance of a microstrip transmission line, a driven

conductor spaced over a ground plane. We use the fact that the driven element has an image in

the ground plane, so that the antenna appears to be a microstrip line with a real conductor in place

of the image and with the ground plane removed. This requires only two slight changes: the

impedance of the anteima is twice that of the microstrip, and the spacing between the antenna

elements is twice the microstrip height. This is the reason for the two extra factors of 2 above.

The antenna has a low-frequency cut-off which is related to the length of the antenna, as

determined experimentally.

2.2 1.2 m TEM Horn Antenna Design

Figure 7 shows a model of the TEM horn antenna, and Figure 8 shows an actual NISThuilt 1 .2 m TEM horn antenna. The dimensions of the anteima are w = 20 cm. h = 24.5 cm, Lh =

1 .2 m. and Lx =41.5 cm. Therefore, the impedance of the 1 .2 m TEM horn antenna is 194 D, as

given by cq. (3 ) Ihe antenna is constructed with a 4: 1 transformer/balun. two outer antenna
Figure 7. Numerical model of a 1.2 m TEM horn antenna.

plates without a ground plane and a resistively tapered section. The photograph in Figure 8 shows each section ot the 1 .2 m TEM horn antenna. From left to right we see the resistive

termination, the antenna element section, the balun. and the coaxial airline surrounded by ferrite

beads to suppress common-mode current. A close-up ot this last section is shown in Figure 9. The Styrofoam between the elements is used as a support, and it has a relative permittivit} of

1.05. It has little effect on the internal field structure, thus maintaining the proper VSWR and

impedance.

2.2.1 Balun for the 1.2 m TEMHorn Antenna

We have used two types of RF pulse transformers or baluns in our 1.2 m TEM horn

antennas. The first is rated from 500 kHz to 1 GHz and is configurable for either a 50 Q

unbalanced or a 200 H balanced transformer. It has a rise time of 0. 18 ns and an insertion loss of

approximately 0.4 dB. Figures 10 and 1 1 show the pin configuration and dimensions for this first

balun. The second balun has a cleaner impulse response than the first, but is onh rated from 2 MHz to 750 MHz. It can also be configured as either a 50 Q unbalanced or a 200 Q. balanced

transformer and the pin diagram is shown in Figure 12.

I'igurc 8. A Nlsr-dc\clopcd 1.2 in IT!M horn antenna.
Figure 9. Close-up view ot balun network, ferrite cores, and

coaxial connector for a 1 .2 m TEM horn antenna.

^ 015 ±0,005 DIA

„ (0.38-0.13)

IDENTIFICATION

ON PIN ^^

1 2 3

4 5 6

0.088

(2 2) —

0.100

(2.5)

0.200

0.375 ±0.020

(9.5 ±0.5)

0.312 MIN

{7.9)

0.050

<5.1) U

J f • • •

(1.3) t

J -0 375 ±0.020

(9.5^:0.5)

0. 150 MAX

T (3.8)

Dimensions in ( ) are in mm.

Figure 10. Pin diagram for balun 1 1.2 m TEM antenna. (Data used with permission from M/A COM. Inc. [22].)

10
50 OHM

UNBALANCED

2

-O 6

200 OHM

BALANCED

O 4

PINS 1,3.5 ARE GROUNDED TO CASE

Figure 11. Balun 1 configuration for 50 Q. unbalanced operation.

(Data used with permission from M/A COM. Inc. [22].)

(0.43)

p.0l7*.002 /j\

CONTRASTING COLOR OCT

.050 TYP

3-i-(l.27)

1=.

..(^, ~25i.OI

u

(3.173) .125 MAX

J^

0081.001(0.20)

XXX ± .005

(XX ± .13)

Figure 12. Pin diagram for balun 2: 1 .2 m TEM antenna . (Data used with permission from Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. [23].)

2.2.2 1.2 m TEMHorn Resistive Taper Design

The resistive taper is designed and engineered to reduce reflections from the aperture o\'

the antenna. Each TEM antenna has a unique design for the resistive taper, so each will be

discussed in its respective section. Much design time has been spent determining the best wa> to

provide an impedance transition from the parallel-plate impedance to free-space impedance.

Several papers [24 - 26] describe how to resistiveh load antennas for the best impedance match

The ideal load distribution for a dipole antenna is an exponential distribution |4. 24 1 1 igiire 1 .^

11
illustrates the resistive taper for one of our 1.2 m TEM horn antennas. This particular taper was

designed with chip resistors located at the junctions between copper sections. The exponential

distribution is controlled b> both the size of the resistors and the size and the distribution of the

copper sections. The copper is a piece of single-side cladded material in which areas were etched

away to provide gaps for placement of resistors. The etched centerline is used to control overmoding. Table 1 shows the gap width, section lengths, nominal resistor values, number of

resistors at each junction, and total gap resistance currently used in our antennas. The loading of

the resistive taper increases roughh exponentially with distance from the aperture of the antenna.

Figure 14 is a schematic of this configuration. The slots are bridged by a row of resistors soldered

to the conductors on either side of the slot. From 6 to 13 resistors are used, depending on the

desired value of the resistance. The spacing between the slots should neither be the same, nor

harmonically related. This may produce a resonance at the common spacing.

Likewise, maintaining any spacing greater than one-quarter wavelength at the highest

frequency of use is not desirable. In order to maintain a reasonably uniform current distribution on the antenna, we recommend that the individual resistors be spaced less than 0.1 X, apart for the

highest operating frequency. Either ceramic chip or one-eighth-watt carbon resistors can be used

below 1 GHz. Above 1 GHz. only ceramic chips should be used. Figures 15 and 16 show

input impulse responses without and with a resistively loaded taper. The aperture causes a

Figure 13. Resistively tapered aperture for 1 .2 m TEM horn antenna.

12
Table 1. Dimensions and resistor values for 1.2 m TEM resistive taper.

Copper section

length 1, (mm)

Nominal resistor

values

(H)

No. of resistors

along gap

Total gap

resistance, z,

(Q)

19.1 9.4 11 0.85

31.8 15.95 13 1,23

50.6 22.9 11 2.08

82.5 38.6 7 5.51

101.6 62.5 8 7.81

104.8 93.9 6 15.65

fairly large reflection between 15 ns to 20 ns. When the aperture is resistively loaded, the

reflection is reduced significantly. Figure 1 7 shows time-domain impulse responses of a pair of

1 .2 m TEM horn antennas having different baluns and tapers. The first major reflection is from

the balun/transformers, and the second train of reflections is from the resistive taper. Figure 1 8 is

the time-gated, reflected frequency response of a pair of 1 .2 m TEM horn antennas.

1 2 \ A 5 h

1

\

22

/

Z3

/ /

Z5

/

26

/

4 »

1,

1 r *

"2 I3 I4 I5 le

Figure 14. Resistively tapered section tor 1 .2 m HIM horn antenna.

13
«ax) —I

20OO —

Reflection

from

aperture.

so>

^ooo —

.4C00

20 30 Tim» (ns)

Figure 15. Input reflection characteristics of an unloaded TEM horn antenna.

(Private communication with Arthur Ondrejka.)

4CO0 —

,

2CO0

t

—

-2CO0 —

.4CC0

Ui^^^^^^^^A w^

10

"1—'—

r

20 30 Time (ns) 40 EO

Figure 1 6 Input reflection characteristics of a resistively loaded TEM horn antenna.

(Private communication with Arthur Ondrejka.)

14
0.2

at

-0.1 GUI I [lorn 2

-0.2

8 12 Time (ns) 16 20

Figure 17. Time-domain impulse response of Uvo 1.2 m TEM horn

antennas having different baluns and tapers.

800 1 200

Frequency (MHz)

2000

Figure 18. Frequene\ -domain mput rctlcetu)n eoetticient of two 1 2 m

Tl'M horn antennas having different baluns and tapers.

15
2.3 36 cm TEMFull-Horn Antenna with Ground Plane

Figure 19 shows a model ot the original NIST TEM horn antenna, and Figure 20 shows

the NIST-built 36 cm TEM horn antenna. The dimensions of the antenna are w = 23.3 cm,

h = 9. 1 cm. Lh = 36.6 cm. This results in an anteima impedance ot approximately 95 Q. The

antenna is constructed with t\vo outer antenna plates and originally with a ground plane in

bet\veen the elements. This was later removed, as discussed in the previous section and as is also

discussed in the numerical modeling section below. The balun is a passive device that converts

the unbalanced input current into two balanced currents that drive two 50 H coaxial transmission

lines 1 80° out of phase. A close-up of this section is shown in Figure 2 1 . Resistive tapers have

not yet been implemented in this particular antenna; however. Section 2.4.2 describes a resistive

taper design for a 36 cm TEM half-horn antenna that will eventually be implemented.

2.3.1 36 cm TEMFull-Horn Antenna Balun

The baluns are known as hybrid couplers/junctions. It is a passive design that allows an

input signal to be converted to a combination of in-phase (0°) and an out-of-phase (180°) output

signal, to provide a balanced antenna drive. We have also looked at balun designs in a microstrip

environment [27. 28] but have not yet incorporated these.

antemia

elements

ground

plane

Figure 19. Diagram of a 36 cm TEM fiill-hom antenna with ground plane.

16
fflfiE /^

Figure 20. Photograph of 36 cm TEM flill-hom antenna.

The antenna baluns were implemented by use of commercially available 0° to 180" microwave

hybrid couplers. We measured the hybrid couplers of two separate manufacturers for use in the

TEM horn antennas. The insertion loss and phase through the hybrid determines the one most

suitable for our design. Figure 22 shows the insertion loss through both ports of Hybrid A. The

insertion phase through the out-of-phase port for Hybrid A is shown in Figure 23. This plot

shows that hybrid losses vary from about 1 dB at low frequencies to 5 dB at high frequencies.

The insertion phase shows variations of less than a degree from 45 MHz to 2000 MHz and

variations of about 5° at the upper frequencies. For Hybrid B. we see the same loss magnitudes

through the hybrid (Figure 24), but the phase (Figure 25) seems to be linear across a larger

frequency band, and therefore this is the hybrid used in our 36 cm TEM full-hom antennas.

Antenna

Elements Coaxial

x'^irlines

Input

Figure 21 . Two 50 il coaxial cables drncn 18(r out-of-phasc.

17
2000

Frequency (MHz)

3000 4000

Figure 22. Insertion loss for Balun A through the 0° and 180° ports.

-170 —

-172

-174

Ji -176 —

i -178

-180 —

-182 —

-184

1000 2000

Frequency (MHz)

3000 4000

Figure 23. Insertion phase through Balun A.

18
1000 2000

Frequency (MHz)

3000 4000

Figure 24. Insertion loss for Balun B through the 0° and 180° ports.

-170

-172 —

-174

2i -176

g- -178

-180 —

-182

-184

1000 2000

Frequency (MHz)

3000 4000

Figure 25. Insertion phase through Balun B.

19
2.4 36 cm TEM Half-Horn Antenna

Figure 26 is a photograph (top view) of a 36 cm long TEM half-horn antenna. The

dimensions of the antenna are w = 22.7 cm. h = 3.9 cm, and Lh = 36.5 cm, and the angle formed

between the ground plane and the antenna plate is 6°. The impedance of this antenna is

approximately 45 Q.. This antenna is designed to be supported over a large ground plane. The

ground plane removes the need for a balun. Figure 26 shows the main antenna element

(triangular in shape), a copper ground plane to which the coaxial cable is attached, Styrofoam to

provide support, and the cloth resistive taper. Drawings of this antenna are shown in Figures 27

to 29.

Figure 26. Top view of 36 cm TEM half-horn antenna

20
Type-N

connector

Copper ground-plane Cloth resistive

Styrofoam support

taper

36.5 crn' ->

22.7 crn ;

15 cm

Figure 27. Top view drawing of 36 cm TEM half-horn antenna.

Type-N

connector

Coaxial

Inner conductor

Cloth resistive taper

5 4 cm

15cm

Figure 28. Side view drawing of 36 cm TEM half-horn antenna.

21
2.4.1 36 cm TEMHalf-Horn A ntenna Feed-Pointfor Impedance

Matching

Figure 29 shows a close-up of the feed-point to the antenna. Although this feed-point

construction is discussed in detail here, it applies to the feed-point of all TEM horn antennas. The

first thing that one notices is that the antenna element does not come to a point. This is cut such

that the width of the element at the feed-point and the height of the coaxial cable provide the

appropriate impedance match to 50 Q. The aspect ratio of the plates must be chosen to maintain a

50 D impedance at both the feed-point and the aperture. The second key feature is that the solder

patch is at the \ er\ end of the coaxial cable. This minimizes the inductance betsveen the ground

plane and outer conductor of the coaxial feed cable. The capacitance depends on the distance

bet^veen the outer conductor of the coax and the antenna plate, so the dielectric bead can touch

the antenna plate but the outer coaxial cable cannot. This is a rather delicate connection, so care must be taken to secure the antenna element to the Styrofoam and ground plane.

2.4.2 36 cm TEMHorn Antenna - Cloth Resistive Taper

Coaxial nner conductor

(soldered to antenna plate)

Figure 29. Close-up view of feed-point detail for the 36 cm TEM half-hom antenna.

22
In this section we will discuss the design of the resistive taper for the TEM half-horn

antenna. The resistive taper is used to minimize the reflection at the aperture. Figure 30 shows

the input reflection characteristics without a resistive taper. The first reflection is from the feedpoint transition between the 50 Q coaxial cable and the upper plate of the antenna. The second

larger reflection is due to the aperture. As noted previously we can minimize the reflection from

the feed-point by making sure the feed-point impedance is matched and the cabling has intimate

contact with the ground plane. The aperture reflection can be minimized by providing a transition

to 377 Q. In the 1.2 m TEM horn antennas, this was accomplished using copper-clad circuit

boards and adding resistors. In the course of research we found that this can also be

accomplished by using various layers of resistive cloth between the aperture and free-space for

the smaller TEM half-horn antennas.

We looked at several types of resistive cloth for use in the resistive taper design. The first was a

0.6 —

Aperture

Reflection

4 6 Time (ns)

Figure 30. Time-domain plot of the reflections from the TEM

half-horn antenna without a resistive taper.

23
stranded-copper cloth. It is a copper-coated fabric. The second material hasd a black-silvery

sheen to it and was made with a carbon-loaded pohmer on rayon threads. The third cloth had a

lighter shading of black, due to less carbon loading. We measured the resistance of each sample

with an ohmmeter. using a fixture to hold the fabric taut. The calculation of the sheet resistivity

is summarized in the following table:

Table 2. Various Resistive Fabric s and Their Measured Resistivity.

Fabric

(dimensions in cm)

Resistivity

(Qm)

^

Copper-coated sample

(11.4x5.4)

0.142

Dark black sample 1 (15x4.3)

Measured along grain

259

Dark black sample 1 (15.4x4.2)

Measured cross-grain

344

Light black sample 2

(15.3x4.1)

Measured along grain

785

Light black sample 2

(14.9x4.3)

Measured cross-grain

855

The sheet resistance R is given by

R=pA

(4)

where p is the resistivity, L is the length of the sample, and A is its cross-sectional area, given by

the product of width and thickness. We measured the resistance R with an ohmmeter and solved

for the sheet resistance R^ or pit {t is the thickness of the sample), so that our fmal equation

becomes

^ = R^

Rw

L

(5)

24
We considered how different materials could be used to minimize the reflection from the antenna

aperture. The materials were arranged so that most of the fields would dissipate quickly, thereby

minimizing aperture radiation. The copper material provides a low-impedance environment and

the black fabric a high-impedance environment in which to dissipate the fields. Figure 3 1 shows

a photograph of the first design, a copper sheet with triangular points, allowing the fields to

dissipate quickly. This copper fabric was sewn to the black resistive cloth with conductive

thread. This allows the remaining fields to dissipate in the black resistive fabric. The complete

resistive taper section is 15 cm long, which is one-half wavelength at 500 MHz. This frequency was chosen to limit the length of the taper. The resistive taper was attached to the copper antenna

plate with a conductive epoxy. The improvement to the aperture reflection characteristics are shown in Figure 32. We see that the aperture reflection was reduced by half by introducing the

resistive taper.

Figure 31. Copper fabric for resistive taper backed by black resistive cloth.

25
Half-hom without taper Half-hom with taper

^

3 0.2

-0.2

10 15 Time (ns)

Figure 32. Plot showing the decrease in amplitude of the aperture reflection after

resistive termination was incorporated.

Multi-point taper

Triangular taper

Elliptical taper

Square taper

Figure 33. Various cloth resistive taper designs.

26
We experimented with some other tapered designs to see whether we could minimize the

reflection further. These are shown in Figure 33. The reflection coefficient for each t\pe of

termination is shown in Figure 34. We can see that the "layered-moon" taper, shown in Figure

35, and the elliptical taper of Figure 33 have the lowest reflection coefficient across the measured

frequency band. Figure 36 shows the input time-domain response of the best taper. This taper

decreased the reflection from the aperture by almost half for two of our horns, Horn 1 and Horn 2.

Thus we have shown that we can reduce the reflection at the end of a TEM half-horn antenna by

using a fabricated resistive taper of conductive cloth.

1000 2000

Frequency (MHz)

No Taper

Elliptical Taper

Triangular Taper

Mulh -point taper Layered moon-final

3000 4000

Figure 34. Reflection coefficient for various taper designs.

27
Figure 35. Close-up of the "layered-moon" " resistive termination.

0.6 —

1

No Taper

with square taper layered moon taper-Horn 1 layered moon taper-Horn 2

4 6 Time (ns)10

Figure 36. Input time-domain impulse response of resistively tapered

TEM half-hom antenna.

28
2,5 Horn-to-Horn Responses a nd Measured Antenna Factors

Having discussed the design of TEM horn antennas, we now present some typical timedomain and frequency-domain signatures of these antennas to show both the short-impulse

response and the constant-frequency hom-to-hom response indicative of TEM horn antermas.

Figure 37 and 38 show the time-domain signatures of the 1.2 m TEM horn anterma and the 36 cm

TEM horn antenna, respectively. Using the transmission measurements we can extract antenna

factors and gain using the three-anterma method [29]. Figure 38 shows the measured antenna

factor for three of our 1.2 m TEM horn antermas and two of our 36 cm TEM fiill-hom antermas,

where antenna factor is defmed in eq. (1). Due to a difference in baluns used, the red trace in

Figure 38 is different from the other 1.2 m TEM horn traces.

Large 1.2 m TEM time record

Room

Reflections

Figure 37. Hom-to-hom transmission measurement of our 1.2 m TEM hom

antennas at a separation of approximateh 3 m.

29
36.6cmTEM:

0012 —

,

0008

0004

-0.004

-0.008

-0.012

20 Time (ns) 30 40

Figure 38. Hom-to-hom transmission measurement of our 36 cm TEM full-horn antenna at a

separation of 3 m.

40

30

CQo

20 —

10 —

Horn 1- 1.2 m TEM

Horn 2 -1.2 m TEM

Horn 3 -1.2 m TEM

Horn 4 -36.6 an TEM

Horn 5 - 36.6 on TEM

40 80 120 Frequency (MHz)

160 200

Figure 39. Measured antenna factor (AF) for three 1,2 m TEM horn antennas

and two 36 cm TEM full-horn antennas.

30
3.0 Antenna Numerical Design

It is useful to model antennas by numerical methods as this allows us to look at design

modifications, to understand antenna performance, and to diagnose design flaws prior to actual

fabrication. We used a high-frequency numerical-modeling software package that employs the

finite-element method. The selected software has a large database of materials and their

electromagnetic properties and a number of boundary' conditions that can be individually selected

and incorporated into the model. The initial tetrahedral mesh can be automatically or manually

dispersed throughout the volume. However, as the solution progresses, the mesh is automatically

refined to increase accuracy. The solution is determined on a per frequency basis, but the

solution can be extrapolated to other frequencies around the solution frequency. The postprocessor allows one to look at fields, patterns, S-parameters, and impedances. Mathematical

operators can also be applied to look at various other electromagnetic quantities of interest such

as the Poynting vector. We concentrated on different aspects of modeling for each of our TEM horn antennas. The 1 .2 m TEM horn antennas were designed before numerical modeling was available. For this

reason, we were interested in the performance of these antennas, namely the far-field radiation

patterns, without having to do the extensive measurements required to obtain such patterns. We

then compared these simulated patterns to specific cut-plane measurements taken in our

laboratory. For the 36 cm TEM full-horn antennas, we looked at the impact of various design

changes to understand their importance without having to construct modified antennas. We also

looked at the far-field patterns of the current antenna design. Finally, the 36 cm TEM half-horn

antenna was modeled to look at possible problems related to the truncated ground plane and to

suggest design improvements.

3.1 Numerically Modeled and Me asured 1.2 m TEM Horn Antenna

Patterns

This section discusses simulated and measured antenna patterns for a 1.2 m TEM horn

antenna. A numerical model was compared to measurements taken in the laboraton. . The

numerical model allows us to understand the fields that radiate from the antenna and how the\-

interact with the surrounding environment. Figure 40 shows the 1 .2 m TEM antenna model used

in the finite-element software package. The radiation boundar> was a perfectly matched la>er

(PML) optimized from 100 MHz to 1000 MHz. A resistive taper was included in the model.

Pattern measurements were taken in the time-domain laboratory on an H m x 8 m grcnind-plane

31
[30]. The experimental setup is shown in Figure 4 1 . One horn was placed on a foam tower set on

a turntable and rotated through 360° in 3° increments; the other horn was set on a foam tower and

held stationary'. The antennas were separated by a distance of 3.24 m. Both antennas were

connected to a vector network analyzer (VNA) for measurements from 1000 MHz to 2000 MHz.

The angular increments were chosen to allow near- to far-field transformations in this frequency

range [30]. Our measurement facility contained tvvo adjacent concrete walls and a ceiling at a

height of 5 m. To minimize reflections from the walls and ceilings, time-gating, absorber, and

measurement sweep time were utilized. In Figure 42, the applied time gate is shown by the

rectangle between 13 ns and 30 ns. The horizontal ovals indicate room effects, and the vertical

oval indicates a reflection from the horn feed. Figures 43 to 45 compare the measured and

simulated antenna patterns for 100 MHz, 500 MHz. and 1000 MHz, respectively. It should be

noted that the model used one antenna and an ideal monitor point, whereas the measurements were made using two antennas. This could account for the differences seen in Figures 43 to 45.

Figure 43 shows the results for the vertical and horizontal polarizations at 100 MHz. Figure 44

shows the results for the vertical and horizontal polarizations at 500 MHz. The simulated results

f 1.2 m TEM horrn antenna

PML Layers

Figure 40. Drawing of 1.2 m TEM horn antenna in modeling program.

32
show good agreement to within a few decibels on boresight and to within 10 dB at various side

lobes for the measured results. We also see more lobing at 500 MHz with simulated results quite

comparable to measurements. Figure 45 shows the results for the vertical and horizontal

polarizations at 1000 MHz. Although magnitudes tend not to be accurately modeled, the lobing

patterns are represented reasonably well. These simulations allow us to look at the patterns and

understand why we see phenomena such as larger ground bounce in the horizontal polarization at

500 MHz.

3.24m

Figure 41. Experimental setup for 1.2 m TEM horn pattern measurements.

33
0.012

0.008

0.004

0-

-0.004

Degrees

54-,

0.002 -

0) DC

-0.002

-0.004

90 Degrees

10

0' Timing Diagram Raw Time Plot 1

Time Gate

Feed

Room Reflections

90 Timing Diagram Raw Tine Plot 2 Gated Tine Plot 3 n

'—

20 30

Time [ns]

"T"

40 50

Figure 42. Time-domain graphs showmg reflections from antermas and room.

Measured

Simulated

100 MHz

Horizontal Polarization Vertical Polarization

Figure 43. Pattern simulation and measurement at 100 MHz for 1 .2 m TEM horn antenna.

34
Measured

Simulated

500 MHz ISO

Horizontal Polarization Vertical Polarization

Figure 44. Pattern simulation and measurement at 500 MHz for 1.2 m TEM horn antenna.

Measured

Simulated

1000 MHz

Horizontal Polarization Vertical Polarization

Figure 45. Pattern simulation and measurement at 1000 MHz for 1 .2 m TEM hom antenna.

35
3,2 36 cm TEMFull-Horn Numerical Modeling

Our goal in modeling the 36 cm TEM ilill-hom antenna was to understand the antenna

patterns and to look at pattern control using various design modifications. We looked at the

antenna as originally assembled (which included the center ground plane), the effects of removing

the ground plane, adding resistors to the sides of antennas to restrict fields, and curving the front

edge of the apertures. Figure 46 shows anteima modifications made. The original 36 cm TEM

design (including ground plane) is sho\vn in Figure 20, Section 2.3. 1 . The center ground plane was grounded to the outer conductors of the incoming 50 Q coaxial lines and then the two outer

antenna elements were connected to the center conductors of the coaxial lines. We knew that the

1 .2 m TEM horn anteimas had a bifurcated pattern because of experiments and the numerical

models shown in the previous section, and so we expected some pattern irregularities from the 36

cm TEM full-horn antennas as well. Figure 47 shows the antenna pattern modeled at 500 MHz,

the difference between front lobe radiation and feed-point radiation (z-axis) is approximately 3

dB. The aperture of the antenna is pointing along the x-axis. Modeling showed us that more

No ground

plane

Curved

elements

/

resistors

Figure 46. Simulated modifications for the 36 cm TEM horn antenna.

36
Figure 47. Modeled 3D far-field antenna pattern for 36 cm TEM full-horn antenna.

radiation was emanating from the feed-point than from the aperture of the antenna. The model

shows that the difference is small. We confirmed this with measurements that are shown in

Figure 48. The blue trace represents aperture radiation and the red trace represents feed-point

radiation.

Figures 49 to 5 1 show far-field radiation patterns at three other frequencies with the

antenna in the vertical polarization. At 875 MHz (Figure 49). the antenna is pointed toward the

right edge of the page. Most of the radiation is coming from the aperture, but there are man> side

lobes. A biflircated pattern is seen at 1500 MHz (Figure 50) and the antenna is now pointing

toward the left edge of the page. The main fields are coming from the two antenna plates and the

aperture center. A non-directive pattern is seen at 2800 MHz, as shown in Figure 5 1 and again

the aperture is pointing toward the left edge of the page. We also looked at the total fields

propagating both within and in the space immediately outside the anterma. This is shown in

Figures 52 and 53 at a frequency of 500 MHz. The fields do propagate sphericalh out from the

aperture of the antenna. In summar>', the 36 cm TEM full-horn antenna with ground plane shows

feed-point radiation, bifiircated lobes, and asymmetrical far-field patterns at higher frequencies.

37
0.012

0.008

0.004

Boresiglit-small ITM

90 detirees-small TEM

-0.004

-0.008

-0.012

10 20 30 40 Time (ns) Figure 48. Measured time-domain waveforms along the boresight and feedpoint radiation planes.

Modification of the original design included (1) removing the ground plane, (2) adding

resistors between the tvvo antenna elements to confine the fields, and (3) curving the front

aperture plates to minimize reflection loss due to sharp edge transitions. The results of removing

the ground plane are shown in Figures 54 and 55 at a frequency of 800 MHz. In Figure 54, we

see that as the fields propagate from the aperture of the antenna they are distorted when the

ground plane is included in the design. However, in Figure 55, the removal of the ground plane

allows the fields to more easily transition into the free-field environment after leaving the

aperture of the antenna. Figure 56 shows the fields in an antenna with the ground plane removed

but without the resistors and curved apertures plates, and Figure 57 shows the antenna without the

ground plane and with added enhancements. From these simulations we find the best

improvement would be to remove the ground plane. We also attempted to suppress the feed-point

radiation by placing a carbon sleeve over the feed-point of the antenna. Figure 58 shows that the

sleeve did not decrease this radiation; experiments have verified this finding.
875 MHz

Figure 49. Simulated far-field antenna pattern at 875 MHz for 36 cm TEM full-horn antenna.

1500 MHz

Figure 50. Simulated far-field antenna pattern at 1500 Ml Iz for 36 em TFM liill-hom antenna

39
.ab^.41

J

2800 MHz

Figure 5 1 . Simulated far-field antenna pattern at 2800 MHz for 36 cm TEM full-horn antenna.

Figure 52. Total electric field in XZ-plane at 500 MHz for 36 cm TEM

full-horn antenna with ground plane (side view).

40
Figure 53. Total electric field in XY-plane at 500 MHz for 36 cm TEM

full-horn antenna with ground plane (top view).

Figure 54. Total electric fields at 800 MHz for 36 cm ll'M full-hom antenna

with ground plane (top view).

41
Figure 55. Total electric fields at 800 MHz for 36 cm TEM ftill-hom

antenna without ground plane (top view).

Figure 56. Total electric fields at 500 MHz for 36 cm TEM flill-hom

antenna without ground plane and no enhancements (top view).

42
Figure 57. Total electric fields at 500 MHz for 36 cm TEM ftill-hom

antenna without ground plane but will all enhancements (top view).

Figure 58. Total electric fields at 500MHz for 36 cm TEM horn antenna

with carbon sleeve

43
3. 3 TEMHalf-Horn Niimerical Design

The last numerical simulation was completed for a TEM half-horn antenna lent us by

Professor R. Scholtz from the UltraRad Lab at the Universit}' of Southern Califomia. We

performed numerical simulations of the antenna for both the feed-point and pattern. This antenna

is sho\vn in Figures 59 and 60. The TEM half-horn sits on a ground plane that is 19.2 cm square. The antenna opening is 3.9 cm above the ground plane and is 18 cm in width at the aperture. This

gives a width-to-height ratio of approximately 4.6. The tip of the antenna rests on the center

conductor of the 3.5 mm coaxial cable that runs through the ground plane. The tip is soldered to

the inner coaxial line. Both the ground plane and antenna plate are manufactured from copper

with St\Tofoam holding the position of the upper plate. This particular TEM half-horn antenna is

designed to operate from 100 MHz to 4000 MHz. The modeled antenna is shown in Figure 61.

For this particular antenna, we looked at the input return loss both for the original design and for

a model containing a larger ground plane. We see that at the higher frequencies the model with

the larger ground plane has slightly better return loss (Figure 62) compared to the original design

(Figure 63). We looked at the original design and increased the ground plane by two times and

recalculated the fields and antenna patterns for various frequencies.

Figure 59. Front view of USC TEM half-horn antenna.

44
Figure 60. Side view of USC TEM half-horn antenna.

Figure 61. Model for numerieal .simulations of a TEM half-horn antenna.

45
Plot! iSMolnxDoto

i

Figure 62. Input return loss for antenna design with larger ground plane.

Plotl:SWolrixOoto

Frequency (GH2I

Figure 63. Input return loss for original antenna design.

46
Figure 64. Close-up view ot electric fields at modeled antenna feed-point.

Figure 64 shows a close-up view of the feed point between the incoming coaxial airline and the

antenna plates. There is not much radiation emanating from this point, and the fields radiate out

in a spherical pattern. Figure 65 shows a larger view of the original design, and illustrates the

Figure 65. Total electric-field propagation along original USC antenna.

47
fields propagating along the antenna, the current discontinuity at the aperture of the antenna, and

the feed-point radiation with respect to other field levels. We also see that the radiation diffracts

around the ground plane, so that the whole structure radiates as the antenna instead ofjust from

the aperture. As we enlarge the ground plane (Figure 66), more radiation propagates from the

aperture than from the bottom of the ground plane so that we get more of a discone-like antenna

pattern. Figures 67 through 74 show the far-field radiation pattern from these various antenna

designs in the original design and then with the larger ground plane at various frequencies from

1000 MHz to 4000 MHz. In Figure 67, the antenna aperture is pointing out along the x-direction

and the upper antenna plate is in the positive z-direction. With the smaller ground plane, the

simulated far-field pattern confirms that there is radiation coming from the underside of the

antenna, whereas the larger ground plane simulations of Figure 68 show less radiation on the

underside of the antenna (z direction). The original design (Figure 69) still shows lobes

emanating from the bottom of the ground plane. At 2000 MHz (Figure 70), we see that with a

larger ground plane the radiation begins to give us the far-field antenna pattern characteristics of a

discone antenna with the major lobe at approximately 45° in elevation. In figures 71 and 73, at 3000 MHz and 4000 MHz. we see radiation propagating along the bottom of the ground plane,

but in Figures 72 and 74. with the larger ground plane, the pattern is more directional and

emanates strongly from the aperture. In other words, the ground plane is acting like an infinite

ground plane as the ground plane is enlarged; whereas, when the ground plane is truncated at the

aperture of the antenna it acts like an antenna element causing radiation. In conclusion, a larger

ground plane, as shown in Figure 26, is better for the 36 cm TEM half-horn antenna.

Figure 66. USC half-horn antenna modeled with a larger ground plane.

48
rEtot (V) at 1000 MHz

7.1CO-K0

1.1 -Cl?«<»'

J. 1 •?><•'

.::-(-• •' l.Cille -'1

\

r

^^^^gy^V

Figure 67. Side-view, far-field antenna pattern, original design.

rKtot (V) at 1000 MHz

^ 2.287J*H>1 1 2.C«4*^1

1.857VO:

1.6i;6e»01 MM l.JSr/eKrl HUH l.l«.-3e«<rl ^H 9.5738* OO ^^1 7.1?10»»00 nm 4.e822*«O0

E^ij'S ?,&?54<.»O0

i '"'''' 3.£4?*«-01

Figure 68. Side-view, far-field antenna pattern, larger ground plane.

49
rEtot (V) at 2000 MHz

Figure 69. Side-view, far-field antenna pattern, original design.

rEtot (V) at 2000 MHz

B

2Mi2»*oi

1.8S7<e«01

«»W)| m l,$«i7ft*<il 1.5353e«Cl ^H 1.0671««C1 ^^1 8.0053e«<i0 ^H 5.5556«*<» ^98 2.6€78e»O0 O.CiOi»KO

\,_ «e:?''T:^

Figure 70. Side-view, far-field antenna pattern, larger ground plane.

50
rEtot (V) at 3000 MHz

z a

2.242?*«)1

2,co:i?*«oi

2.a.S7?«:o

4.7j7e<-<ii

\

Figure 71. Side-view, far-field antenna pattern, original design.

^ 3.91S3c«01 HH 3.5512f01

3.1436<'01 2.7559«»01

t' ' 2.i682«^01 IVQl 1.93<:<6«*01 1 1.5329c»01

S«a!r. 1.2>»2c»01

8.17SS<.O.J ECS3 4.29$3e«W

4.2224e-01

rEtot (V) at 3000 MHz

2

Figure 72. Side-view, far-field antenna pattern, larger ground plane.

51
<l

l,418i>«Ul

1.2783««0:

i.i5e6<«<:

7.195€c«CO

;..73S7e«i;0 :.« 'IP^'CO

r;. ' -JVtX>

1

, 1,, ^v .CO

2.1115^01

rEtot (V) at 4000 MHz

z

(

-u

Figure 73. Side-view, far-field antenna pattern, original design.

rEtot (V) at 4000 MHz

z

[

2,-t874c»Crl 2.24Cr3««01 1.9344e*01

1.7473c«Crl l.W14f01

1. 254^*01

1.0i<34e«ai 7.6187e»CO

2.6S36e»C<0 2.2364e-01

Figure 74. Side-view, far-field antenna pattern, larger ground plane.

52
4. TEMHorn Antenna Applications

The following sections will discuss various measurement applications using TEM hom

antennas. In each application, we find the TEM antennas useful because of their short-impulse

response and linear phase. A brief description of the measurement effort is discussed and then an

explanation is given of why the TEM hom antenna proved invaluable during each effort.

4. 1 Building-Material Measurements by Use of TEM Horn Antennas

Our most recent application is to measure the dielectric properties of building materials.

This project was supported by the Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES). The key

benefit to using TEM hom antennas for building materials measurements involves their ability to

be a part of a mobile unit. A free-field version of our TEM hom antenna measurement system

can be transported to a specific location and used in-situ to measure the electromagnetic

properties of materials. A picture of the ground-planed based setup is shown in Figure 75. This

is a half-hom on a portable ground plane. It is a 50 Q system where the ground plane eliminates

the need for a balun. This is a usefial measurement system when the sample may be heavy to lift

or when minimizing losses (especially balun losses) are an issue.

Figure 75. Experimental setup for measurement of reinforced concrete walls.

53
The measurement schematic is shown in Figure 76. and the measurement is performed as

follows. The TEM half-horn antennas are separated by a specified distance, and the four Sparameters are obtained using a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA). This is known as a reference

or background measurement. It includes reflections from the room and the antennas. In the

second measurement, a 1.5 m- 1.5 m sample size of eighth-inch aluminum is placed

symmetrically between the antennas and a metal-reference measurement is taken. The metal is

then removed and a building material sample is inserted between the two antennas. All

measurements have the background measurement in common and therefore spurious intemal

reflections can be removed by subtraction from both the reference measurement and the sample

measurement in the time domain. What remains is the response due to the sample and the

reference. Time-gating is applied here to remove an\' other responses that are not directly

associated with the sample response. The sample response is then normalized by the reference

response in order to obtain the reflection coefficient Fsampie of the material sample as given in the

half-horn antennas

Ground Plane

Reference Measurement

Building Material or Metal Sheet

Figure 76. General measurement setup for reference and sample measurements.

54
following equation,

S - S

j^ \\ sample \\ background ( C^\ sample q q

' \ )

\\ metal- reference 1 1 _ background

Figures 77 through 80 show the data processing sequences for the reflection coefficient of the

concrete sample. Figure 77 represents the original data from the network analyzer and includes

the Sn concrete sample data (black trace) and the Sn background data (red trace). The initial

reflections are from the coaxial transitions and feed-point of the antenna. The largest reflection is

from the aperture of the antenna, and the last reflection in the black trace is from the concrete

sample itself The x-axis is time (nanoseconds) and the y-axis is the amplitude (volts) of the

signal. After the background waveform is subtracted from the sample waveform and from the

concrete waveform, v/e obtain the traces shown in Figure 78. We then want to extract only the

information about the concrete sample itself so we time-gate the waveforms (Figure 79) in order

to eliminate reflections not associated with the sample. After transformation to the frequency

domain, we obtain the traces shown in Figure 80. The reflection coefficient of the concrete

sample Fsampic is shown as the blue trace. The transmission coefficient is obtained in much the same way. The equation governing this is given by

rp 2\ concrete (gated) ('1\

sample ^

" \ /

2 1 _ background ( gated

)

The waveforms for eq. (7) are shown in Figures 81 and 82. Figure 81 shows the measured timedomain transmission S-parameters for concrete (black trace) and background (red trace). We gate

the background measurement as shown in Figure 79. and we gate the concrete waveform based on time-of-flight calculations. Figure 82 is the calculated frequency domain transmission

coefficient for the S21 concatc (black), S21 background (red), and the normalized transmission coefficient

of the concrete sample, Tsampic(blue). From the four S-parameters. we can extract the permittivit}'

of the concrete sample [31].

55
0.16

0.12 —

0.08 —

0.04 —

-0.04

Time (ns)

Figure 77. Input Sn measurement traces for air reference (red)

and concrete sample (black).

0.02 —

0.01

.S

-0.01 —

-0.02

-0.03

Ungated

Concrete - Air Metal Reference - Air Reference

9 10 Time (ns) 12

Figure 78. Subtracted Sn for concrete sample (black) and references (red).

56
0.02 —

>

!1

0.01 — r

" '"A 1

-0,01 —

.1

.1

-0.02 — I'

. , . 1 — Metal Reference - Air Reference

' 1

' 1

1

1

' 1' 9 10 Time (ns)

11 12

Figure 79. These are the gated waveforms for Figure 78.

-20

3 -40

-60

/

Concrete - Air Reference

Metal Reference - Ajr Reference Normalized (SI 1)

2000 4000

Frequency (MHz)

6000

Figure 80. (Si i concrete- Si i background) (black), (Sii rnctal-reference- Si i backarounj) (red).

and normalized or Fsampie (blue) traces.

57
0.02

Figure 81 . Time-domain traces for S21 concrete (black) and S21 background (red).

— Air Reference — — \onnalizcd(S21)

-20

y

1 -40 / ^-"V

2000 4000

Frequency (MHz)

6000

Figure 82. Frequency domain gated data for S21 concrete (black). S21 background (red), and the normalized transmission coefficient Tsampic (blue).

58
4.2 Aircraft Measurements

One of the most common applications of our TEM horn antennas is the measurement of

shielding effectiveness or penetration of various aircraft compartments. The equipment we use is

a network analyzer, optical fiber link, cabling, and both the 36 cm TEM flill-hom antermas and

the 1 .2 m TEM horn antennas. We take reference measurements in the same way as described

above, but at a number of antenna separations, to look at 1/r tendencies. Typically, the antermas

are placed atop towers that align them with the aircraft windows. Two-1 .2 m TEM horn antennas

are placed on one tower in the vertical and horizontal polarizations and the 36 cm TEM antermas

are placed on the other tower in the vertical and horizontal polarizations. After the references are

taken, the 36 cm TEM ftill-hom antenna is placed inside an aircraft compartment and the other

antenna with the 1.2 m TEM horn antennas is placed at various angular positions outside the

aircraft at a specific distance; measurements are then taken (Figure 83). After data processing

techniques are applied, we obtain the shielding effectiveness of various aircraft compartments.

270

180

Figure 83. Diagram showing placement of antennas around aircraft for

shielding-eftectiveness measurements. Placement depends on space availabilit}

.

59
Figure 84 shows a photograph of a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Bombardier

aircraft [32]. The FAA was interested in the shielding effectiveness of smaller aircraft such as

this and asked NIST to collaborate. Three compartments were measured: (1) the flight deck. (2)

the passenger cabin, and (3) the cargo compartment. The external TEM horn antenna was placed

at approximateh 30 m from the geometric center of the aircraft and rotated from 0° to 190°, 270°,

and 330° to 355° around the aircraft at increments of 5° and 10°. Results shown in the following

figures are given for penetration into the passenger cabin with the external antenna at an angle of

40°. Figure 85 shows the time-domain deca> of the fields within the aircraft. The initial direct

antenna-to-antenna response is shown at around 75 ns. Figure 86 shows the 6 m free-space

reference along with the actual penetration measurement into the aircraft. The free-space

reference is deconvolved from the raw penetration measurement to obtain the normalized

penetration of the aircraft shown in figure 87.

Figure 84. Bombardier aircraft used in shielding effectiveness measurements.

60
0.0004 —

1

0.0002 —

-0.0002

-0.0004

-0.0006

200 Time (ns) 400

Figure 85. Time-domain waveform for penetration into FAA Bombardier aircraft.

—I

m

-100

Free-space reference

Frequency (GHz)

Figure 86. Free-space reference and penetration measurement into the aircraft

61
Frequency (GHz)

Figure 87. Normalized penetration for aircraft with external antenna at 40 degrees offset from center of aircraft at approximately 30 m. Internal antenna is in passenger cabin.

62
4.3 RF Absorber Measurements

These measurements tested a various samples of RF absorbing materials to determine

their reflective properties across the frequency band from 30 MHz to 1200 MHz [33]. These

samples were tested in our lab, which is a non-ideal environment, that is, a non-anechoic

chamber. In this measurement, reflections are recorded at both normal incidence and oblique

incidence, and after digital signal processing, the properties of the absorber are obtained.

Open area test sites (OATS) may be difficult to use because of the high ambient signal

levels, inclement weather, and limited availability. Therefore, EMI and EMC measurements are more commonly conducted in anechoic chambers, which require the use of RF absorbing

materials across a specific band of frequencies. Thus, the optimization of the chamber is a must,

which leads to a need for the accurate characterization of the absorber. The tests conducted at NIST allowed us to characterize the properties of the absorber by using small quantities of

material. The equipment used in these tests involved the 1.2 m TEM horn antennas and the VNA

to collect data in the frequency domain. Fourier transforms were used to move the data into the

time domain, and gating was applied to isolate scattering events related exclusively to the

absorber. The resulting data were inverse Fourier-transformed to show the frequenc> response of

the absorbing material.

The testing method is similar to that given in Section 6.1 for concrete measurements,

wherein the reference is taken without the sample and then the sample is inserted in order to

obtain the reflection coefficient as given in eq. (6). Figure 88 shows how an oblique-incident

measurement is taken. The antennas are placed at equal angles from the normal and are pointed at

the absorber.

Sample Holder

Sample

'^"^^sample&holder'^"

leasurement Zone" Shadow Region

TEM Antennas

Figure 88. Movement of the sample in and out of the measurement zone For background subtraction.

63
Ofll -

I

Room ralBcdoM

Figure 89. Impulse response of 1.2 m TEM-hom antenna shown by the

dashed parentheses.

This background subtraction eliminates s\ stematic effects from the measurements, or, in

other words, common reflections from the measurement environment. Both normal and oblique

measurements were made was in order to determine the curvature effects and to look at the

various timing incidents. Oblique-incidence absorption is important in chamber design. Figure

89 shows the 1.2 m TEM horn antenna response in the time domain. The impulse response is

approximately 2 ns for the 10 % points and precedes an\ room reflection or ground bounce. The

two plots in Figure 90 show a normal incidence measurement of the absorber in our laboratory'

environment. The time domain allows us to look at events that happen in time. The TEM horn

antennas allow us to resolve individual events because of their short impulse response. The

impulse response of a log-periodic antenna was shown in Figure 2 and is roughly 40 ns in

duration. If we were to use log-periodic antennas to measure the absorber, we would be unable to

gate the waveform because the impulse response would make the edge effects and room

reflections unresolvable. The detailed paper [33] discusses the effects of using various gates and

how to optimize this gate. The same graph as shown in Figure 90 is also presented for obliqueincidence measurements in the original paper.

64
0.002

0.001

<1> c

o

W

IT

-0.001 —

-0.002

-0.003

0.001

Shadow Region / Room Reflections

Start of Long Cones

Ferrite Tile Response

Edge and Room Effects Removed

1 ^ r

28 32 Time [ns]36 40

Figure 90. Time-domain gating ot absorber measurements.

4.4 Shelter Evaluations

Another evaluation was taken at an OATS facility to determine the impact of a fiberglass

structure on emissions measurements being conducted within the building shown in Figure 91 [6]. The building is used to protect equipment and provide temperature stabilization during

measurements. Measurements were taken using the 1 .2 m TEM-hom antenna. This OATS

facility was designed around the ANSI C63.7 standard, which provides qualitative guidelines

concerning the type and construction of shelters, but does not provide and quantitative

information on the effects of the shelter on the measurements. The measurements of this facility were performed with a time-domain measurement system to quantify shelter effects. The OATS facility was designed to be both a T\pe-1 and a Type-2 structure. A T>pe-1

structure encloses the measurement range including the equipment under test and the transmitting

and receiving antermas, which are placed 3 m apart. Type-2 facilities enclose onh the equipment

under test, and the receiving antenna is placed 10 m do\vn range. The measurements discussed in

65
Figure 91. Evaluation of OATS facility using 1.2 m TEM horn antennas.

the technical note will be the Type-2 results. A brief summary of the Type-1 results is presented,

but for further details refer to the paper [6]

.

Again the measurement sequence is as follows: (1) a reference measurement is taken;

with the TEM horn antennas placed at a height of 1 .6 m and a separation distance of 10 m on an

unobstructed area of the OATS: (2) the receiving antenna is then placed 10 m down range of the

shelter and the transmitting antenna is placed inside the shelter to obtain the shelter measurement;

(3) the two spectra are then time-gated in the time-domain and transformed back into the

frequency domain to obtain the shelter effects. The equation governing this quantity is

S,-, {shelter '12g y\

\S^j {reference)\

(8)

where A represents the deviation in site attenuation due to the presence of the shelter,

Si2g(sheher) and S|2g (reference) arc the frequency-domain amplitude spectra of the shelter and

reference, respectively. The time-domain waveforms associated with this measurement are shown in Figure 92. The amplitude differences seen between the two waveforms are due to the

presence of the shelter. We see additional shelter scattering effects immediately after the direct

path and ground bounce signatures. The results showed that the shelter is not electrically

66
0.002

0.001

c

DJD c«

-0.001

-0.002

Shelter Scatterint

Direct Path Cable & Internal >/ Antenna Reflections

1 A Ground Bounce

1^

Reference-Unobstructed

40 50 60 70

Time (ns)

Figure 92. Time-domain transmission results for the reference and shelter measurements.

The antennas were oriented in the vertical polarization.

transparent in the frequency range from 30 MHz to 1200 MHz. In the Type-1 measurements, the

antennas were aligned along the short and long dimensions of the shelter, and the results showed

that the shelter effects were significantly reduced with the antennas both inside. Moreover, the

observed deviations seen in the long direction of the shelter were likely due to scattering from the

structural beams. In summary, the shelter has a large effect on the measurement, and our timedomain system can distinguish between scattering events, which can prove useful in

understanding data taken at such sites.

4.5 EMC Compliance Chamber Testing

The short-impulse response of TEM horn antennas makes them a powertul tool for

testing EMC facilities [34]. TEM horn antennas were used in a portable measurement system to

determine whether modifications to an EMC chamber were successful, or whether further

improvements were required. The measurement frequency range of the s\stcm is from 30 MHz

to 1200 MHz. the bandwidth of the 1.2 m TEM horn antennas.

Industr\ is increasingh required to improve both accuracy and efficiency of emissions

and immunity testing procedures. For this reason, the NIST time-domain s> stem was used to

67
evaluate an absorber-lined chamber. The NIST s} stem has the following positive characteristics:

(1) it lessens the need for site-to-site comparisons. (2) it provides the abilit>' to observe directly

changes to chamber. (3) it uses time-gated reference to minimize cost and time of quasi freespace reference. (4) it has high range resolution capabilities, and (5) it reduces chamber-antenna

coupling. The system is the same as previously mentioned in Sections 4. 3 and 4.4, so attention

will be focused on the data-processing method in this section.

The intent of the data-processing sequence is to isolate the desired propagation effects

and then to use these to determine two separate measurement metrics. The first metric is Ml,

which defines the response of the entire chamber and reveals imperfections in the chamber

en\ironment. The second metric is M2. which time-gates out the direct antenna coupling and

allows us to define the scattering from the chamber boundary

The data processing sequence is as follows and is shown in Figure 93:

(1) Continuous-wave (cw) transmission data taken using a VNA,

(2) Inverse Fourier transform applied,

(3) Time-gate 1 applied or Time-gate 2 applied.

(4) Fourier transform applied,

(5) Performance metrics Ml and M2 obtained.

Time-domain results are shown in Figure 94. Details of the measurements before and

after the retrofit are described in [35]. as well as the pertinent equations and results of the testing.

These antennas are important for other EMC applications [34 - 37] such as compliance,

immunity testing, and radiated emissions, and have excellent antenna characteristics for such

measurement applications.

68
\Chamber Waveform

\ in time-domain

Apply Time

A

-Gate

for Reference

Apply Time-Gate

forMl,M2

EFT

Calculate Performance

Metric Ml or M2

Figure 93. Signal-processing sequence.

0.004

n

c

S)

ina0)>

u

-0.004

Direct Coupling

Floor

20

Ceiling &

Sidewalls

24

Chamber Waveform with

Direct Coupling Gated Out

Gated Reference

I

' r

28 32

Time (ns)

36 40

Figure 94. Various gating techniques to obtain

chamber performance metrics. Ml and M2.

69
4.6 Conducted and Radiated UWB Emissions

TTiese important ultrawideband (UWB) emissions measurements will be very briefly

discussed here; for details refer to reference [38]. These tests were used to measure emissions

from common UWB devices in order to determine the interference probability. This system

consisted of a single-event transient digitizer and the 36 cm TEM fiill-hom antennas as receiving

antennas. Signal processing techniques, similar to previous sections, are used to obtain the

resultant spectral amplitude characteristics, which can then be used to determine suspect

frequencies. The importance of using TEM horn antennas in these measurements is to allow us to

resolve the impulse characteristics of these devices and to minimize the influence that the

receiving characteristics of the antenna has on the device under test.

5. Conclusions

We have presented design equations, numerical modeling, and insight on constructing

three ultrawideband. phase-linear, short-impulse response TEM horn antennas. The 1.2 m TEM

horn antenna covers the frequency band from 30 MHz to 1.5 GHz. The 36 cm TEM full-hom

antenna covers the frequency band from 100 MHz to 4 GHz. The 36 cm TEM half-hom antenna

is appropriate for ground-plane based measurements. The balun design and resistive taper design

are important for proper impedance matching, and each design is unique to the antenna, although

standardization is possible. Pattern measurements and design modifications have been simulated

in a fmite-element modeling environment and have provided insight into measurements and

pattern behavior. Finally, various applications were presented showing how these antennas are employed in aircraft shielding measurements, compliance chamber testing, facility evaluations,

and free-space material measurements. Because of the favorable characteristics of these t\pes of

antennas, we are able to measure in a wide variety of measurement environments.

6. Acknowledgments

We enthusiastically applaud the career-long research of Arthur Ondrejka. who has

dedicated his efforts to the pursuit of the perfect TEM horn antenna. Without his valuable

insights, our research would not be where it is toda\ . We also thank John Ladbur\, who has done

much of the initial research and measurements along with Mr. Ondrejka. Finally, we thank James

70
Baker-Jarvis, Office ot Law Enforcement Standards (OLES), and the Department of Homeland

Security for funding the materials measurements discussed in Section 4.1.

7. References

[1] R. A. Lawton, A. R, Ondrejka. Antennas and the associated time-domain range

for the measurement of impulsive fields. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) Technical Note

1008 (November 1978).

[2] O. Allen, D. A. Hill. A. J. Ondrejka. Time-domain antenna characterizations.

IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 35(3): 339-346 (August 1993).

[3] R. T. Lee, G. S. Smith. A design study for the basic TEM horn antenna, IEEE

Antennas Propagat. 46(1): 86-92 (Februar\ 2004).

[4] K. Chung, S. Pynn, S, Chung, J. Choi, Design of a wideband TEM horn antenna. 2003 IEEE Intl. Symp. on AP 1: 229-232 (June 2003).

[5] R. T. Johnk, D. R. Novotny, C. M. Weil, M. Taylor, T. L. O'Hara, Efficient and accurate

testing of an EMC compliance chamber using an ultra-wideband measurement system.

2001 IEEE Intl. Symp. on Electromagnetic Compatibilit> I; 302-307 (August 2001).

[6] R. T. Johnk, D. R. Novotny, C. M. Weil, H. W. Medley, Assessing the effects of an OATS shelter: Is ANSI C63.7 enough? 2000 IEEE Intl. Symp. on Electromagnetic

Compatibility 2: 523-528 (August 2000).

[7] D. R. Novotny. R. T. Johnk. C. A. Grosvenor, N. Canales, Panoramic, ultra-wideband

diagnostic imaging of test volumes. 2004 IEEE Intl. Symp. on Electromagnetic

Compatibility 1: 25-28 (August 2004).

[8] G. J. Freyer, M. O. Hatfield. T. A. Loughr>. R. .lohnk. D. M. Johnson, Shielding

effectiveness measurements for a large commercial aircraft. 1995 IEEE Int. Symp. on

Electromagnetic Compatibility. 383-386 (August 1995).

[9] C. A. Grosvenor, R. T. Johnk, D. R. Novotny, N. Canales, C. M. Weil. J. Veneman. A

two-phase airframe shielding performance stud\ using ultra-wideband measurement

systems. Natl. Inst. Stand. Tech. NISTIR 6622 (.Tanuan 2003).

[10] M. Kanda, The time domain characteristics of a traveling-wave linear antenna

with linear and non-linear loads. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) NBSIR 78-892

(Februar> 1979).

[11 1 E. K. Miller. Editor, Time-domain measurements in electromagnetics. New

York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. (1986).

[12] M. Kanda. Time domain sensors and radiators. Chapter 5. New York: Van

Nostrand Reinhold Co. (1986).

71
[13] K. L. Shlager, G. S. Smith, J. G. Maloney, Accurate analysis of TEM horn

antennas for pulse radiation. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 38(3): 414-423

(August 1996).

[14] R. T. Lee. G. S. Smith, On the characteristic impedance of the TEM horn

antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. 52(1): 315-318 (Januar\' 2004).

[15] F. M. Greene, Development of electric and magnetic near-field probes. Nat. Bur.

Stand. (U.S.) Tech Note 658 (January 1975).

[16] M. Kanda. The characteristics of broadband, isotropic electric field and magnetic

field probes. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) NBSIR 77-868 (November 1977).

[17] G. Franceschetti. C. H. Papas. Pulsed antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat.

AP-22(5): 651-661 (September 1974).

[18] A.R.A. Technologies. Inc. [web page] 2004; http://\vAv\v.aratechinc .com/_private/Antennas .htm [Accessed 8 March 2004].

[19] K. C. Gupta, R. Garg. I. Bahl, P. Bhartia. Microstrip lines and slotlines. Artech

House, Inc., Second^ed. p. 10 (1996).

[20] F. E. Gardiol. Microstrip circuits. New York: Wiley (1994).

[21] F. Assadourian, E. Rimai, Simplified theory of microstrip transmission systems.

Proc. Inst. Radio Eng. 40: 1651-1657 (December 1952).

[22] Website: M/A COM. Inc. [web page] 2006; http://wwAV.macom.com/DataSheets/TP103.pdf [Accessed 25 May 2006].

[23] Website: Sirenza Microdevices, Inc. [web page] 2006;

http://www.sirenza.com/pdfs/datasheets/FP-522.pdf [ Accessed 25 May 2006]

[24] M. Kanda, The eftects of resistive loading on TEM horns. Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) NBSIR

79-1601 (August 1979).

[25] S. Evans. F. N. Kong. TEM hom antenna: Input reflection characteristics in transmission.

Proc. lEE 130H(6): 403-409 (October 1983).

[26] L. T. Chang. W. D. Bumside. An ultrawide-bandwidth tapered resistive TEM hom

antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. 48(12): 1848-1857 (December 2000).

[27] A. SinopoH. W. D. Bumside. A slotline/bowtie hybrid antenna for use as a compact range

feed. Ohio State Univ. Tech. Report 7219, 29-46 (March 1992).

[28] C. Kwngho, S. Pwn. C. Jaehoon. Design of an ultrawide-band TEM hom antenna with a

microstrip-type balun. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. 53(10): 3410-3413 (October

2005).

72
[29] E. B. Larsen, R. L. Ehret, D. G. Camell, G. H. Koepke, Calibration of antenna factor at a ground screen field site using an automatic network analyzer, 1989 IEEE Symp. on

Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 19-24 (May 1989).

[30] J. G. Veneman. D. R.. Novotny, C. A. Grosvenor, R. T. Johnk, N. Canales, Ultrawideband antenna pattern characterization in a non-ideal EM facility. Antenna

Measurement Techniques Association 24"^ Annual Mtg. and Symp. pp. 96-100

(November 2003).

[3 1] J. Baker-Jarvis, M. D. Janezic, J. H. Grosvenor, R. G. Geyer. Transmission/reflection and

short-circuit line methods for measuring permittivity and permeability. Natl. Inst. Stand.

Technol. Tech. Note 1355 (1992).

[32] R. T. Johnk, C. A. Grosvenor, D. G. Camell, D. R. Novotny, Ultrawideband shielding

evaluation of a business jet. SAE AE-2 Lightning Committee, Portland, ME, May 16-18,

2006.

[33] D. R. Novotny, R. T. Johnk, A. Ondrejka, Analyzing broadband, free-field, absorber

measurements. 2001 IEEE Intl. Symp. on Electromagnetic Compatibility 2: 1 152-1 157

(August 2001).

[34] M. J. Alexander, EMC antenna considerations. Compliance Eng. (July-August

2003).

[35] M. J. Alexander, Using antennas to measure the strength of electric fields near equipment. Compliance Engineering Annual Reference Guide 17(3): 66-83

(2000).

[36] K. Armstrong, T. Williams, EMC testing. Part 1: Radiated emissions. EMC Compliance

J. 27-39 (Februar\' 2001).

[37] C. A. Grosvenor, R. Johnk, D. Novotny, N. Canales. TEM-hom antermas: A promising

new technology for compliance testing. Intl. Symp. on Electromagnetic Compatibility' 1: 25-28(9-13 August 2004).

[38] R. T. Johnk. DR. Novotny, C. A. Grosvenor. N. Canales, J. G. Veneman, Time-Domain

measurements of radiated and conducted ultra-wideband emissions. 2003 IEEE Conf on

Ultra Wideband Systems and Technologies 245-249 (November 2003).

73



NIST Technical Publications

Periodical

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology—Reports NIST research and development

in metrology and related fields of physical science, engineering, applied mathematics, statistics, biotechnology, and

mformation technology. Papers cover a broad range of subjects, with major emphasis on measurement methodology and

the basic technology underlying standardization. Also included from time to time are survey articles on topics closely

related to the Listitute's technical and scientific programs. Issued six times a year.

Nonperiodicals

Monographs—Major contributions to the technical literature on various subjects related to the Institute's scientific and

technical activities. Handbooks—Recommended codes of engineering and industrial practice (including safety codes) developed in cooperation with interested industries, professional organizations, and regulator^' bodies.

Special Publications—Include proceedings of conferences sponsored by NIST, NIST annual reports, and other special

publications appropriate to this grouping such as wall charts, pocket cards, and bibliographies.

National Standard Reference Data Series—Provides quantitative data on the physical and chemical properties of

materials, compiled from the world's literature and critically evaluated. Developed under a worldwide program

coordinated by NIST under the authority' of the National Standard Data Act (Public Law 90-396). NOTE: Tlie Journal of

Physical and Chemical Reference Data (JPCRD) is published bimonthly for NIST by the American Institute of Physics

(AJP). Subscription orders and renewals are available from AIP, P.O. Box 503284, St Louis. MO 63150-3284.

Building Science Series—Disseminates techmcal information developed at the Institute on building materials,

components, systems, and whole structures. The series presents research results, test methods, and performance critena

related to the structural and environmental functions and the durability and safety characteristics of building elements and

s\stems.

Technical Notes—Studies or reports which are complete in themselves but restrictive in their treatment of a subject.

Analogous to monographs but not so comprehensive in scope or definitive in treatment of the subject area. Often serve as a vehicle for final reports of work performed at NIST under the sponsorship of other government agencies.

Voluntary Product Standards—Developed under procedures published by the Department of Commerce in Part 10. Title

15, ofthe Code of Federal Regulations. The standards establish nationally recognized requirements for products, and

provide all concemed interests with a basis for common understanding of the characteristics of the products. NIST

administers this program in support of the efforts of private-sector standardizing organizations.

Order the following NISTpublications—FIPS and NISTIRs—from the National Technical Information Service,

Springfield VA 22161

Federal Information Processing Standards Publications (FIPS PUB)—Publications in this series collectiveh constitute

the Federal Information Processing Standards Register. The Register serves as the official source of information in the

Federal Government regarding standards issued by NIST pursuant to the Federal Propert> and Administrative Services

Act of 1949 as amended. Public Law 89-306 (79 Stat. 1 127), and as implemented by Executive Order 1 1717 (38 FR

12315, dated May 1 1,1973) and Part 6 of Title 15 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations)

NIST Interagency or Internal Reports (NISTIR)—The series includes mtenm or final reports on work perfomied by

NIST for outside sponsors (both government and nongovernment). In general, initial distribution is handled b\ the

sponsor; public distribution is handled by sales through the National Technical Information Ser\ ice. Springfield. VA

22161, in hard copy, electronic media, or microfiche form NISTIRs may also report results of NIST projects of transitory or limited interest, including those that will be published subsequently in more comprehensive fomi.
U.S. Department of Commerce

National Bureau of Standards and Technology

325 Broadway

Boulder, CO 80305-3328

Official Business

Penalty for Private Use $300