alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
                                              330 E. Warm Springs
                                              Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                     702.528.1984
                                               702.362.0540 (fax)





April 15, 2002


To Whom It May Concern:

I  have  issued my report dated April 15, 2002, accompanying  the
financial statements of ATR Search Corporation on Form 10-KSB for
the period of March 2, 2001 (inception date) through December 31,
2001.  I hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference of
said report  in  the  Annual Report  of ATR Search Corporation on
Form 10-KSB  (File No. 000-33187).

Signed,

/s/ Brad Beckstead

G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6805

JEFFREY S. BLANEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

G. F. DRISCOLL, Law Librarian,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-98-1449-AM)

Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey S. Blaney, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville,

Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffery S. Blaney appeals from the district court’s order

denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm substantially on reasoning of the district court, see Blaney

v. Driscoll, No. CA-98-1449-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2002), noting

that because the motion to reconsider was filed more than ten days

after entry of the final judgment, the motion only is properly

considered under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Den Europæiske Unions C 235A/23.

| | ISSN 1725-2393 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 235A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 48. årgang23. september 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2393

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 235A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

48. årgang23. september 2005

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Berigtigelser |
| | |
| 2005/C 235A/2 | Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelig udvælgelsesprøve EPSO/AST/7/05 om oprettelse af en ansættelsesreserve af assistenter (AST3) — Finansiel forvaltning/Regnskabsføring og Forvaltning af projekter/kontrakter (Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 178 A af 20. juli 2005) | 3 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

Berigtigelser

2005/C 235A/2

Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelig udvælgelsesprøve EPSO/AST/7/05 om oprettelse af en ansættelsesreserve af assistenter (AST3) — Finansiel forvaltning/Regnskabsføring og Forvaltning af projekter/kontrakter (Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 178 A af 20. juli 2005)

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

3

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

Berigtigelser

23.9.2005

| 23.9.2005 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 235/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 235/3

---

Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelig udvælgelsesprøve EPSO/AST/7/05 om oprettelse af en ansættelsesreserve af assistenter (AST3) — Finansiel forvaltning/Regnskabsføring og Forvaltning af projekter/kontrakter

(
  Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 178 A af 20. juli 2005
  )

(2005/C 235 A/01)

Side 25, punkt A.II.2 »Erhvervserfaring«:

I stedet for:

| — | i punkt A.II.1.i), eller |
| --- | --- |

—

i punkt A.II.1.i), eller

| — | i punkt A.II.1.ii) |
| --- | --- |

—

i punkt A.II.1.ii)

have mindst 5 års erhvervserfaring fra relevant fuldtidsbeskæftigelse.«

læses:

læses:

| — | i punkt A.II.1.i), eller |
| --- | --- |

—

i punkt A.II.1.i), eller

| — | i punkt A.II.1.ii) med hensyn til eksamensbevis og erhvervsbeskæftigelse |
| --- | --- |

—

i punkt A.II.1.ii) med hensyn til eksamensbevis og erhvervsbeskæftigelse

have mindst 5 års erhvervserfaring fra relevant fuldtidsbeskæftigelse.«

---
|                                                                                                                                         Exhibt 32.1 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

****

****

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
```

```

            In connection with the Annual Report of ExpressJet Holdings,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James B. Ream, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | ( | 1 | ) |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              |
|--------|---|---|---|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | ( | 2 | ) |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company. |

 
```

 
```

|  Date:  February 13, 2004             |                       | **/s/ James B.Ream                        ** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                               | James B. Ream President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                            |

```

```
### §2662. Return requirements

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall prescribe by regulations the person who is required to make the return with respect to the tax imposed by this chapter and the time by which any such return must be filed. To the extent practicable, such regulations shall provide that—

(1) the person who is required to make such return shall be the person liable under section 2603(a) for payment of such tax, and

(2) the return shall be filed—

(A) in the case of a direct skip (other than from a trust), on or before the date on which an estate or gift tax return is required to be filed with respect to the transfer, and

(B) in all other cases, on or before the 15th day of the 4th month after the close of the taxable year of the person required to make such return in which such transfer occurs.

#### (b) Information returns

The Secretary may by regulations require a return to be filed containing such information as he determines to be necessary for purposes of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 99–514, title XIV, §1431(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2728.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to generation-skipping transfers (within the meaning of section 2611 of this title) made after Oct. 22, 1986, except as otherwise provided, see section 1433 of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.

#### Extension of Time for Filing Return

Pub. L. 111–312, title III, §301(d)(2), Dec. 17, 2010, 124 Stat. 3300, provided that: "In the case of any generation-skipping transfer made after December 31, 2009, and before the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 17, 2010], the due date for filing any return under section 2662 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (including any election required to be made on such a return) shall not be earlier than the date which is 9 months after the date of the enactment of this Act."
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20- 22485-Civ-Cooke/Goodman

STEVEN J. TYMAN, individually and on behalf )

Of all other similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. )

)

FORD MOTOR COMPANY and LORENZO )

ENTERPRISES CORP. d/b/a LORENZO FORD )

)

Defendants. )

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT, LORENZO ENTERPRISES 

CORP. d/b/a LOREZO FORD’S MOTION TO COMPELL ARBITRATION AND 

STAY PROCEEDINGS AND MOTION TO STAY COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT UNITL COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS PRECEDENT UNDER 

CHAPTER 501, FLA. STAT.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant, Lorenzo Enterprises Corp. 

d/b/a Lorenzo Ford’s, Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings and/or 

Motion to Stay Count III of Plaintiff’s Complaint until compliance with conditions 

precedent under Chapter 501, Fla. Stat., before the Court on ECF 17 filed on July 

23, 2020.

The Court, having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised in the 

premises, hereby ORDERS and ADJUDGES as follows: 

The Motion to GRANTED. It is further Ordered that the case is STAYED 

pending completion of the arbitration. The parties shall file a notice with the Court 

within 10 days of a final ruling in the arbitration.

It is further Ordered that Plaintiff comply with the written demand letter 

requirements under Section 501.98, Fla. Stat. prior to initiating arbitration as to any 

claims against Defendant under Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practice Act.

Case 1:20-cv-22485-MGC Document 18-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/23/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Miami, Florida, this_ day of 

____________, 20__.

_______________________________

MARCIA G. COOKE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-22485-MGC Document 18-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/23/2020 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:20-cv-22423-UU

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT SH GROUP 

GLOBAL IP HOLDINGS, L.L.C.’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER 

CONFIRMING AN ESI PLAN

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant’s

Motion for Entry of an Order Confirming an ESI Plan (D.E. 30) (the “Motion”). The Court 

having reviewed the Motion, the proposed ESI Plan attached to the Motion as Exhibit B 

(the “ESI Plan”), and the pertinent portions of the record and being otherwise fully advised 

in the premises, it is hereby:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion, D.E. 30, is GRANTED. The parties 

shall produce electronically stored information (“ESI”) as TIFF images with load files and 

the metadata fields listed on Table 1 of the ESI Plan. All other terms of ESI Plan shall 

apply to the parties’ production of ESI in this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 24th day of September

2020.

____________________________________

JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SH GROUP GLOBAL IP HOLDINGS, L.L.C.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,

v.

2399 COLLINS AVENUE CONDOMINIUM 

ASSOCIATION, INC. and JOHN P. 

BOSTANY,

Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. 

Case 1:20-cv-22423-UU Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2020 Page 1 of 1
# Licensing Requests
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Sidem Building Co., Inc., Appellant, against William S. Miller et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of The Macreport.net, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB/A Amendment No. 1 for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, V. William Lucchetti, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
      and
      President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial
      Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








_______ /s/ ___________


V.
      William Lucchetti, Jr.


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      16, 2005
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWorkshop on Mare Volcanism and Basalt Petrogenesis: Astounding Fundamental Concepts (AFC) Developed Over the Last Fifteen YearsPapers presented at the workshop on mare volcanism and basalt petrogenesis are compiled. The discussion of recent ideas and concepts within the context of this workshop permitted to catch up on the developments over the last 15 years. The following subject areas were covered: (1) geological setting; (2) magma evolution and source regions; (3) magma source and ascent processes; and (4) history of volcanism.Document ID19920001743Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsAuthorsTaylor, Lawrence A.*(Lunar and Planetary Inst. Houston, TX., United States)*Longi, John*(Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory Palisades, NY., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryLunar And Planetary ExplorationReport/Patent NumberLPI-TR-91-03NASA-CR-188810NAS 1.26:188810Accession Number92N10961Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4574Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920001743.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle19920001747WorkThe history of lunar volcanism19920001746WorkExploration of relationships between low-Ti and high-Ti pristine lunar glasses using an armalcolite assimilation model19920001745WorkFormation of Apollo 14 aluminous mare basalts by replenishment fractional crystallization and assimilation of precursor crust19920001744WorkThe violent side of mare volcanismN92-10962 through N92-10965Workvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Fort Caroline National Memorial and Theodore Roosevelt Area

Trail Map

Timucuan Preserve 13165 Mt. Pleasant Road, Jacksonville, FL 32225 (904) 641-7155 www.nps.gov/timu

Timucuan Preserve, 2005 (NPS)
§ 108.380 Final approval as a NMVC Company. ( a ) *General rule.* With respect to each Conditionally Approved NMVC Company, SBA will either: ( 1 ) Grant final approval to participate in the NMVC program and designate such company as a NMVC Company, if such Conditionally Approved NMVC Company: ( i ) Within the specific period of time SBA gave to it when SBA conditionally approved it for participation in the NMVC program, has raised: ( A ) The amount of Regulatory Capital set forth in its application, pursuant to § 108.310(a)(1); and
( B ) The amount of matching resources for its Operational Assistance grant award set forth in its application, pursuant to § 108.310(a)(2); and
( ii ) Enters into a Participation Agreement with SBA; or
( 2 ) Revoke SBA's conditional approval of the company, at which time it is no longer a Conditionally Approved NMVC Company and must not participate in the NMVC program or represent itself as a Conditionally Approved NMVC Company.
( b ) *Exception to requirement to raise matching resources* — ( 1 ) *General.* At its discretion and based upon a showing of good cause, SBA may consider a Conditionally Approved NMVC Company to have satisfied the requirement in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this section to raise matching resources in the amount of at least 30 percent of its Regulatory Capital if the Conditionally Approved NMVC Company— ( i ) Already has raised at least 20 percent of the total amount of required matching resources; and
( ii ) Has a viable plan that reasonably projects its capacity to raise the remainder of the required amount of matching resources.
( 2 ) *Request for exception.* Before the expiration of the time period given to it by SBA to meet the requirements to become a NMVC Company, a Conditionally Approved NMVC Company may submit to SBA a request that SBA grant the exception described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. Such Conditionally Approved NMVC must present to SBA evidence of good cause for such request, as well as evidence supporting the elements of the exception described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) *No applicability to Regulatory Capital.* The exception described in this section applies only to matching resources for the Operational Assistance grant award. Under no circumstances will SBA designate a Conditionally Approved NMVC Company as a NMVC Company if such Conditionally Approved NMVC Company does not raise the required amount of Regulatory Capital within the time period SBA gave it to do so.
[66 FR 28609, May 23, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 68503, Nov. 12, 2002]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-cv-22234-MARTINEZ-BECERRA

LINCO ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

OLEG FIRER, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

OLEG FIRER, et al.,

Counter-Plaintiff,

v.

LINCO ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Counter-Defendant.

_____________________________________/

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Agreed 

Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, (the “Motion”), (ECF No. 132). The Parties are requesting that 

the Court enter an order dismissing with prejudice all claims and counterclaims in this action and 

retaining jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement between the Parties. (Id. at 1.) The Court 

may, upon the Parties’ Motion, dismiss this action “on terms that the court considers proper.” See 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Having reviewed the record and being otherwise fully advised as to the 

premises, it is:

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

Case 1:20-cv-22234-JEM Document 133 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2021 Page 1 of 2
1. The Motion is GRANTED as set forth herein. 

2. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. All parties shall bear their own 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction only to enforce the terms of the Parties’ 

settlement agreement referenced in the Motion, (ECF No. 132). See Anago Franchising, 

Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1278–79 (11th Cir. 2012).

4. All pending motions in this case are DENIED AS MOOT, and this case is 

CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 26th day of October, 2021.

___________________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to:

All Counsel of Record

Magistrate Judge Becerra

Case 1:20-cv-22234-JEM Document 133 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2021 Page 2 of 2
#### § 107.1700 Transfer by SBA of its interest in Licensee's Leverage security.

Upon such conditions and for such consideration as it deems reasonable, SBA may sell, assign, transfer, or otherwise dispose of any Preferred Security, Debenture, Participating Security, or other security held by or on behalf of SBA in connection with Leverage. Upon notice by SBA, Licensee will make all payments of principal, dividends, interest, Prioritized Payments, and redemptions as shall be directed by SBA. Licensee will be liable for all damage or loss which SBA may sustain by reason of such disposal, up to the amount of Licensee's liability under such security, plus court costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by SBA.