alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

|   | Exhibit      32 |
|--------|-----------------|

| 1. | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March      19, 2008 | /s/ Thomas R. Butkus                       |   |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date                | Chairman      of the Board and Chief       |   |
|                | Executive      Officer                     |   |
|                |                                       |   |
|                |                                       |   |
| March      19, 2008 | /s/ Lyn G. Rupich                          |   |
| Date                | President      and Chief Operating Officer |   |
|                |                                       |   |
|                |                                       |   |
| March      19, 2008 | /s/ Pamela N. Favero                       |   |
| Date                | Chief      Financial Officer               |   |

----
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Scott H. Ray, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Online, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the Registrant and we have:



5.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's
auditors and to the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: February 20, 2008 |  | /s/SCOTT H. RAYScott H. Ray Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
#### § 3861.6-1 Payment of charges of the public survey office.

With regard to the platting of the claim and other office work in the Bureau of Land Management office, including the preparation of the copies of the plat and field notes to be furnished the claimant, that office will make an estimate of the cost thereof, which amount the claimant will deposit with it to be passed to the credit of the fund created by “Deposits by Individuals for Surveying Public Lands.”
#### § 4.355 Omitted compensation.

When, subsequent to the issuance of a final order determining heirs under § 4.352, it is found that certain additional compensation had been due the decedent and had not been included in the report of compensation, the report shall be modified administratively by the Project Director. Copies of such modification shall be furnished to all heirs as previously determined and to the appropriate administrative judge.
#### § 3175.20 General requirements.

Measurement of all gas at an FMP must comply with the standards prescribed in this subpart, except as otherwise approved under § 3170.6 of this part.
----

----

| Entity                                       | Jurisdiction      of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                         |                               |
| Appleton      Papers Inc.                    | Delaware                           |
| Appleton      Papers Canada Ltd.             | Canada                             |
| Appleton      Papers de Mexico SA de CV      | Mexico                             |
| C&H      Packaging Company, Inc.         | Wisconsin                          |
| American      Plastics Company, Inc.         | Wisconsin                          |
| Rose      Holdings Limited                   | United      Kingdom                |
| Arjo      Wiggins Appleton (Bermuda) Limited | Bermuda                            |
| PDC      Capital Corporation                 | Wisconsin                          |
| New      England Extrusion Inc.              | Wisconsin                          |
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SAMANTHA V. ROUSSELL,

Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-460

[November 19, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE-17-

006417.

Samantha V. Roussell, Miramar, pro se.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, and William P. Heller 

of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Corrine L. Bannister v. George G. Murray.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 9/30/98
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001043102
<NAME> CHANCELLOR MEDIA CORPORATION OF LOS ANGELES
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  334,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,002
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               376,797
<PP&E>                                         367,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,677
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,905,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,472
<BONDS>                                      3,018,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,905,378
<SALES>                                        899,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               899,096
<CGS>                                          116,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  888,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             135,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (91,518)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (15,380)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (76,138)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 47,089
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (140,828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 4

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 2 of 2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHIL PLEASANT, JR.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

DICK ZAIS and CITY OF YAKIMA,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-35958

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-03080-LRS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Lonny R. Suko, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Phil Pleasant, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

in his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 action alleging racial discrimination. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Lindsey v. SLT Los

Angeles, LLC, 447 F.3d 1138, 1144 (9th Cir. 2006). We affirm.

FILED

OCT 06 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-35958

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants

because it is undisputed that Pleasant, an independent contractor, did not complete

the project that he was hired to perform, and he failed to present evidence showing

that the City’s hiring of another contractor to complete the work was based on

racial discrimination. See id. (plaintiff must satisfy the initial burden of

establishing a prima facie case of racial discrimination). Accordingly, Pleasant

failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendants

discriminated against him based on race. 

Pleasant’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 11

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 47-12 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/02/2021 Page 1 of 3
From: TradingAndMarkets

To: Talia Harari; TMOIGLOG@APPSHAREPOINT.AD.SEC.GOV

Cc: TradingAndMarkets

Subject: RE: Request for Advice!

Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 6:49:56 AM

Ms. Harari,

While we are able to provide informal guidance regarding the Exchange Act and the rules adopted

thereunder through this email box, we cannot provide legal advice. As you likely know, applying the

regulations to a particular scenario generally constitutes legal advice.

First, you would need to consider whether the instrument you drafted would constitute a security.

The definitions of the term security are in the Securities Act at 2(a)(1) and in the Exchange Act at 3(a)

(10). In general, a note is considered to be a security. In addition, the definitions generally include a

“privilege on a security,” which would likely include a note convertible into a security (i.e., capital

investment).

If the instrument is a security, then you would need to determine whether your activities would

cause you to fit the definitions of the term “broker” or “dealer.” If so, you would need to register

with the Commission as such. The staff of the Division of Trading and Markets has published some

guidance on the Commission’s website regarding the broker-dealer registration requirements here:

http://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/bdguide.htm. This Guide to Broker-Dealer Registration

discusses the definition of “broker” and the activities/factors the staff and the courts consider when

determining whether a person fits that definition (and would, therefore, need to register with the

Commission).

The Division of Trading and Markets

From: Talia Harari [mailto:taliaharari@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 12:50 PM

To: TradingAndMarkets; TMOIGLOG@APPSHAREPOINT.AD.SEC.GOV

Subject: Request for Advice!

Hi!

I drafted a contract where Person A can loan a private LLC money and be paid back within 12

months at 12% interest. In the contract I also wrote that Person A has the option to convert

that loan into a capital investment in the LLC at any time.

My client sent out an "investment package" which was simply data about the LLC and why it

would be a good idea to convert the loan into an investment in the LLC.

I am an attorney but I am not familiar with SEC regulations. Am I breaking any rules or could

I be potentially breaking any rules by the fact that I'm calling it an investment?

Thank you for your help!

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 47-12 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/02/2021 Page 2 of 3
Best,

Talia Harari

917-972-4944

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 47-12 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/02/2021 Page 3 of 3
### **Subchapter B—Receipt of Payment**

Sec.
6311.
Payment of tax by commercially acceptable means.
[6312.
Repealed.]
6313.
Fractional parts of a cent.
6314.
Receipt for taxes.
6315.
Payments of estimated income tax.
6316.
Payment by foreign currency.
6317.
Payments of Federal unemployment tax for calendar quarter.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title XII, §1205(b), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 998, substituted "Payment of tax by commercially acceptable means" for "Payment by check or money order" in item 6311.

**1971**—Pub. L. 92–5, title I, §4(a)(2), Mar. 17, 1971, 85 Stat. 5, struck out item 6312 "Payment by United States notes and certificates of indebtedness".

**1969**—Pub. L. 91–53, §2(f)(2), Aug. 7, 1969, 83 Stat. 93, added item 6317.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals

Pub. L. 92–5, title I, §4(a)(2), Mar. 17, 1971, 85 Stat. 5, which struck out item 6312, was repealed by Pub. L. 97–258, §5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1068, 1081.
HomeAbout NRCFire ProtectionRelated Information

# Commission (SECY) Papers Related to Fire Protection

Commission (SECY) papers include responses to issues raised by the Chairman and the Commissioners, papers initiated as a result of petitions for rulemaking, and papers initiated when the staff identifies an issue or technical development that should be brought to the Commission's attention for information purposes or action. As a general policy, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission releases SECY papers to the public unless they contain specific limited types of information which warrant protection, including Classified, Safeguards, Allegation, Investigation, Security-Related, Proprietary, Privacy Act Information, Federal/State/Foreign Government and International Agency-Controlled Information, Adjudicatory, Enforcement, Lawyer-Client or Legal Work Product, and limited sensitive matters which contain a specific withhold recommendation and supporting justification. (Reference Internal Commission Procedures, Chapter II.)

The following table lists (in chronological order) the SECY papers that the NRC has issued regarding topics related to fire protection for licensed facilities and materials. The complete collection of SECY papers is available through the NRC Library.

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, August 31, 2023

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 10 CFR Part 50
          - Guidelines for FP in NPPs
          - Inspection Manual
          - Inspection Procedures
          - Administrative Letters
          - Bulletins
          - Circulars
          - Generic Letters
          - Information Notices
          - Regulatory Issue Summaries
          - Regulatory Guides
          - Commission (SECY) Papers
          - Generic Issues
          - Staff-Prepared NUREGs
          - Contractor-Prepared NUREGs
          - Conference Proceedings
          - Brochures
          - FAQs About Fire Protection

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, August 31, 2023
### §1918. District courts; fines, forfeitures and criminal proceedings

(a) Costs shall be included in any judgment, order, or decree rendered against any person for the violation of an Act of Congress in which a civil fine or forfeiture of property is provided for.

(b) Whenever any conviction for any offense not capital is obtained in a district court, the court may order that the defendant pay the costs of prosecution.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 955.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §822 (R.S. §974).

Changes were made in phraseology.
**CERTIFICATIONS**

                              

  I, Joel Gardner, certify that:

     

  

1.     I  have reviewed this annual report on Form  10-KSB of Megola Inc;

     

  

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does  not contain  any  untrue statement of a material  fact,  or omit  to  state a material fact necessary to  make  the statements  made,  in light of the circumstances  under which  such  statements were made, not misleading  with respect  to  the period covered by this annual  report;  and

     

  

3.     Based  on  my knowledge, the financial  statements,  and other financial information included in this annual report,  fairly  present in all material  respects  the financial  position,  results of operations,  and  cash flows  of  the  issuer  as of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this annual report.

     

  

4.     I  am  responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure  controls and procedures for the issuer  and have:

     

     (i)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to  ensure that material information relating to  the issuer  is made known to me, particularly during  the period  in  which  the  periodic  reports  are  being prepared;

       

     (ii)   Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  issuer's disclosure  controls and procedures  as  of  July 31, 2004 ["Evaluation Date"]; and

       

     (iii) Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness   of   the  disclosure   controls   and procedures  based  on  my  evaluation   as   of   the Evaluation Date;

       

  

5.      I   have  disclosed,  based  on  my  most   recent evaluation,  to  the issuer's auditors  and  the  audit committee  of  the  board  of  directors  (or   persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

     

     (i)    All  significant deficiencies in the  design  or operation  of internal controls which could adversely affect  the  issuer's  ability  to  record,  process,  summarize   and  report  financial  data   and   have identified  for  the issuer's auditors  any  material weaknesses  in  internal  controls  (none   were   so noted); and

       

     (ii)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management  or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls (none were  so noted); and

       

  

6.     I have indicated in the report whether or not there were  significant changes in internal  controls  or  in other  factors that could significantly affect internal controls  subsequent to the date  of  our  most  recent evaluation,  including  any  corrective  actions   with regard   to   significant  deficiencies  and   material weaknesses.

     

Date: November 12, 2004
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Plantmaterials project summary reports from the Natural Resources ConservationService to the National Park Service, FY**
 
2012 | 2013| 2014 | 2015| 2016
 
SuDoc:I 29.2:P 69/18/
Item Number:0648 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001036695
 
December 1, 2017
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2009      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |                               |                                             |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                      | PAPERWEIGHT      DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|                      |                               |                                             |
| Dated:      March 1, 2010 |                               |        /s/ Thomas J. Ferree                 |
|                      | Name:                              |  Thomas      J. Ferree                      |
|                      | Title:                             |  Chief      Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of LITFUNDING, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Amended Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  May 10, 2007   /s/  Morton Reed ---------------------- Morton Reed President, Chief  Executive  Officer and Chairman
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 68 FR 51349, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 117.7 Assurances required.

An application for financial assistance administered by the Small Business Administration shall, as a condition of its approval and the extension of such assistance, contain or be accompanied by an assurance that the recipient will comply with this part. SBA shall specify the form of the foregoing assurance, and the extent to which like assurances will be required of contractors and subcontractors, transferees, successors, and other participants.