alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# New Hampshire Shakers

Activity FeeYes

## ** Tags

            -  shakers 
            -  american utopias 
            -  new hampshire 
            -  national register of historic places 
            -  travel itineraries 
            -  travel shaker trail 

Photo by Michael Conway

If you’re near or planning a trip to New Hampshire, consider visiting the state’s two Shaker museums. It is home to both the Canterbury Shaker Village and the Enfield Shaker Village.Canterbury Shaker Village is managed as a museum, offering visitors the ability to visit historic buildings, learn about the community’s history, and participate in a number of workshops.Visitors to the Enfield Shaker Museum can learn about the history of the site and visit preserved Shaker buildings. They’ll also have the opportunity to explore historic Shaker gardens and participate in a number of workshops and events.

## ** Tags

        -  shakers 
        -  american utopias 
        -  new hampshire 
        -  national register of historic places 
        -  travel itineraries 
        -  travel shaker trail 

Last updated: February 28, 2018

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
§ 45.25 How will the bureau respond to any hearing requests? ( a ) *General.* Within 50 days after the deadline in § 45.21(a)(2) or 30 days after the expiration of any stay period under § 45.24, whichever is later, the bureau may file with OEPC an answer to any hearing request under § 45.21.
( b ) *Content.* If the bureau files an answer: ( 1 ) For each of the numbered factual issues listed under § 45.21(b)(1), the answer must explain the bureau's position with respect to the issues of material fact raised by the requester, including one or more of the following statements as appropriate: ( i ) That the bureau is willing to stipulate to the facts as alleged by the requester;
( ii ) That the bureau believes the issue listed by the requester is not a factual issue, explaining the basis for such belief;
( iii ) That the bureau believes the issue listed by the requester is not material, explaining the basis for such belief; or
( iv ) That the bureau agrees that the issue is factual, material, and in dispute.
( 2 ) The answer must also indicate whether the hearing request will be consolidated with one or more other hearing requests under § 45.23 and, if so: ( i ) Identify any other hearing request that will be consolidated with this hearing request; and
( ii ) State which Department will conduct the hearing and provide contact information for the appropriate Department hearings component.
( 3 ) If the bureau plans to rely on any scientific studies, literature, and other documented information that are not already in the license proceeding record, it must provide a copy with its answer.
( 4 ) The answer must also indicate whether or not the bureau consents to service by electronic means under § 45.13(c)(4) and, if so, by what means.
( c ) *Witnesses and exhibits.* The bureau's answer must also list the witnesses and exhibits that it intends to present at the hearing, other than solely for impeachment purposes. ( 1 ) For each witness listed, the bureau must provide: ( i ) His or her name, address, telephone number, and qualifications; and
( ii ) A brief narrative summary of his or her expected testimony.
( 2 ) For each exhibit listed, the bureau must specify whether it is in the license proceeding record.
( d ) *Page limits.* ( 1 ) For each disputed factual issue, the information provided under paragraph (b)(1) of this section may not exceed two pages.
( 2 ) For each witness, the information provided under paragraph (c)(1) of this section may not exceed one page.
( e ) *Notice in lieu of answer.* If the bureau elects not to file an answer to a hearing request: ( 1 ) The bureau is deemed to agree that the issues listed by the requester are factual, material, and in dispute;
( 2 ) The bureau may file a list of witnesses and exhibits with respect to the request only as provided in § 45.42(b); and
( 3 ) The bureau must file a notice containing the information required by paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if the hearing request will be consolidated with one or more other hearing requests under § 45.23, and the statement required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,916,098
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,629,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    537,260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,529,071
<PP&E>                                       6,110,170
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,481,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,628,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,343,003
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,259  
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,149,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,628,316
<SALES>                                      8,265,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,478,193
<CGS>                                        1,578,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,982,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,626,098
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,642
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,050,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,582
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,066,580)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,066,580)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 111—GENERAL PROVISIONS**

Sec.
1651.
Writs.
1652.
State laws as rules of decision.
1653.
Amendment of pleadings to show jurisdiction.
1654.
Appearance personally or by counsel.
1655.
Lien enforcement; absent defendants.
1656.
Creation of new district or division or transfer of territory; lien enforcement.
1657.
Priority of civil actions.
1658.
Time limitations on the commencement of civil actions arising under Acts of Congress.
1659.
Stay of certain actions pending disposition of related proceedings before the United States International Trade Commission.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–465, title III, §321(b)(1)(B), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4946, added item 1659.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §313(b), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5115, added item 1658.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §401(b), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3357, added item 1657.
EX - 11.1

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                        SEAVIEW UNDERWATER RESEARCH, INC.
                                     EXHIBIT
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          QUARTER ENDED      QUARTER ENDED
                                                              MARCH 31,       MARCH 31,
                                                                2000             1999
                                                          -------------       -----------
<S>                                                         <C>               <C>
Net  income ...........................................     $  (237,801)      $   57,693
                                                            ===========       ==========
Pro forma Net Income ..................................     $  (237,801)      $   37,621
                                                            ===========       ==========
Shares:
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding ...       6,884,462        5,000,000
Additional shares adjusted-under nonvested stock for
     diluted earnings per share .......................               0          181,233
                                                            -----------       ----------

Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding .       6,884,462        5,181,233
                                                            ===========       ==========

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income ............................................     $      (.03)      $      .01
                                                            ===========       ==========
Pro forma Net Income ..................................            (.03)             .01
                                                            ===========       ==========
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income ............................................     $      (.03)      $      .01
                                                            ===========       ==========
Pro forma Net Income ..................................            (.03)             .01
                                                            ===========       ==========
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis Fleming, Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting him of violating section 421 of the Penal Law (misleading advertising). Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, the information dismissed, and the defendant discharged. There is no proof that defendant took part either in the preparation of the advertisement or its insertion in the newspaper, which is the only manner of violating the section charged in the information. Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Nolan and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.25

May 13,
2002

Board
of Directors
Duane Reade Inc.
440 Ninth Avenue
New York, New York 10001

Dear
Directors:

We
are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We
have been provided a copy of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2002. Note 3 therein describes a change in
accounting principle from the retail dollar first-in, first-out method of accounting for inventory to the specific cost based last-in, first-out method
of accounting for inventory. It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for inventory has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting
literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management's determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of management's stated
reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning
factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company's circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 20.

We
have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 29, 2001. Accordingly, our comments are subject to change upon
completion of an audit of the financial statements covering the period of the accounting change.

Very
truly yours,

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

---
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Farley 1 & 2 - 10 CFR Part 20 Exemption Request, MSA GMR-I Canister (Part No. 466220) Radioiodine Protection Factor

## HPPOS-037 PDR-9111210173

See the memorandum from D. R. Muller to G. C. Lainas dated June 28, 1984. It recommended an exemption to allow licensees to use MSA GMR-I canisters for protection against iodine gases and vapors with certain restrictions. This action set a precedent. The health physics position was written in the context of 10 CFR 20.103, but it also applies to "new" 10 CFR 20.1703.

The Radiological Assessment Branch (RAB) reviewed a licensee's application for an exemption to 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix A, Footnote d.2 (c) to allow the use of MSA GMR-I Canisters. Although the action established a precedent, the RAB recommended, in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 20.103 (e) [or 10 CFR 20.1703 (a) (2)], that the exemption be approved with restrictions.

The restrictions were enumerated by the NRC staff in their Safety Evaluation Report and are summarized as follows:
        - A protection factor of 50 for radioiodine gases and vapors was to be used.
        - The MSA GMR-I Canisters were to be discarded after a maximum of 8 hours continuous use time.
        - The MSA GMR-I Canisters were not to be used in the presence of organic solvent vapors.
        - The MSA GMR-I Canisters were to be stored in sealed, humidity barrier packaging in cool, dry environments.
        - The service life of the MSA GMR-I Canisters were to be calculated from the time of unsealing, including periods of non-exposure.
        - The MSA GMR-I Canisters were to be used with a full facepiece capable of providing protection factors greater than 100.
        - The MSA GMR-I Canisters were not to be used in total challenge concentrations of organic iodines and other halogenated compounds greater than 1 ppm, including nonradioactive compounds.
        - The MSA GMR-I Canisters were not to be used in environments with temperatures greater than 110F. The above exemptions are subject to amendment by the NRC staff and will remain in effect until rescinded by NRC staff or superseded by regulation.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 20.103, 10 CFR 20.1703, NUREG / CR-3403

**Subject Code:** 8.4, 8.10

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, October 13, 2017
Document

EXHIBIT 10.15

SUPPORT AGREEMENT
THIS SUPPORT AGREEMENT, dated as of March 5, 2021, is made by and among Finxera Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and each of the undersigned (each, a “Stockholder” and collectively, the “Stockholders”).
Reference is hereby made to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 5, 2021 (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), Prime Warrior Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent, and, solely in its capacity as the representative of the Equityholders (as defined therein), Stone Point Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Merger Agreement. 
In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, each of the Stockholders hereby agrees (a) to execute and deliver the Stockholders’ Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement on the Closing Date, and (b) after the date hereof and prior to the Closing Date, shall not sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of any of such Stockholder’s Parent Common Shares, unless as a condition to such sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition, each such transferee executes and delivers a joinder agreement to this Support Agreement in a form reasonably acceptable to the Company; provided, however, that such Stockholder shall be permitted to sell up to an aggregate of 5% of such Stockholder's Parent Common Shares to transferees that are not Affiliates of any Stockholder upon written notice to the Company.   
Sections 9.3, 9.10 9.12, 9.13 and 9.14(a) of the Merger Agreement are hereby incorporated into this Support Agreement, mutatis mutandis, as if set forth in full herein.


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
									
	DOC ID - 35691175.5
		











    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Support Agreement as of the date and year first written above.


                        FINXERA HOLDINGS, INC.


By: /s/ Sanjoy Goyle____________
    Name: Sanjoy Goyle
    Title: Chief Executive Officer
                        


                        /s/ Thomas C. Priore_____________
                            Thomas C. Priore




                        /s/ Lori Priore__________________
Lori Priore, as Trustee for the Thomas Priore 2019 GRAT


Thomas C. Priore Irrevocable Insurance Trust u/a/d 1/8/2010


By: /s/ Lori A. Priore____________
Lori A. Priore, as Trustee




By: /s/ Bertrand H. Smyers________
Bertrand H. Smyers, as Trustee
									
	DOC ID - 35691175.5
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/13/2002 Page 1 of 3
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/13/2002 Page 2 of 3
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/13/2002 Page 3 of 3
HomeAbout NRCNRC COVID-19 UpdateCOVID-19 Regulatory Activities for Nuclear Reactors

Nuclear Reactors COVID-19 Activities:**10 CFR Part 20** | **10 CFR Part 26** | **10 CFR 50.48** | **10 CFR 50.55a Codes & Standards | Owner's Activity Reports** | **10 CFR Part 55** | **10 CFR Part 73** | **Research & Test Reactors** | **Resident Inspectors** | **Approved Licensing Requests**

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

**Site is currently under construction.  Licensees should continue to submit requests for alternatives by mail or through EIE in accordance with the requirements in 10 CFR 50.4.**

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 16, 2021
No. 13,102.

#### Milne et al. *v.*Van Bebber.

(11 P. [2d] 1119)

Decided May 31, 1932.

Mr. V. H. Johnson, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. J. P. Deatherage, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.828 Minimum level of 504 loan activity and restrictions on portfolio concentrations. ( a ) A CDC is required to receive SBA approval of at least four 504 loan approvals during two consecutive fiscal years.
( b ) A CDC's 504 loan portfolio must be diversified by business sector.
[68 FR 57981, Oct. 7, 2003]
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace
National Historic Site
New York


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Site Index
 Last updated: April 1, 2012
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 28 East 20th Street
New York,
NY
10003
 Phone: 212-260-1616 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
### §1695. Stockholder's derivative action

Process in a stockholder's action in behalf of his corporation may be served upon such corporation in any district where it is organized or licensed to do business or is doing business.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 945.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §112 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §51, 36 Stat. 1101; Sept. 19, 1922, ch. 345, 42 Stat. 849; Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 526, §1, 43 Stat. 1264; Apr. 16, 1936, ch. 230, 49 Stat. 1213).

The phrase "is organized or licensed to do business or is doing business" was substituted for the words "resides or is found," as more specific and to conform to section 1391 of this title.

Venue provisions of section 112 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., appear in section 1391 and 1401 of this title. Other provisions are incorporated in section 1693 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Armando RAMIREZ-TRUJILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40416.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*273Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Armando Ramirez-Trujillo (Ramirez) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced to 71 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment.

Ramirez argues for the first time on appeal that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662).

Ramirez’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Ramirez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert, denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Ramirez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 89-6628.

#### Sutherland et al. *v.*First National Bank of Commerce.

Ct. App. La., 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.