alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCContracting OpportunitiesInformation for Small Businesses

# Small Business Exchange and Matchmaking Events

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is committed to ensuring that small businesses have the maximum practicable prime and subcontract opportunities in support of agency mission operations. Support extends the entire portfolio of Federal small business programs, including businesses owned by the disadvantaged, women, veterans, service-disabled veterans, and companies located in Historically Underutilized Business Zones (HUBZones). The NRC's Small Business Program aids, counsels, and assists small businesses interested in providing products and services to the agency in support of mission operations.

The Small Business Program hosts and delivers in collaboration with the agency's Acquisition Management Division, Office of the General Counsel, and the major technical program offices, Small Business Exchange and Matchmaking Events on how to conduct business with the agency. Links to upcoming and* *prior events can be found in the table below.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 26, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Overview of the Small Business Program
          - Tips for Conducting Business with NRC
          - Forecast of Contracting Opportunities
          - Small Business Contracting Programs
          - Small Business Exchange and Matchmaking Events
          - Other Useful Small Business and Acquisition Links
          - Subcontracting Opportunities
          - Calendar of Small Business Events

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 26, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 10Q OF ARGOSY GAMING COMPANY.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          49,585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,429
<INVENTORY>                                      1,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,413
<PP&E>                                         541,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 519,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,846
<BONDS>                                        255,568
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           284
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   519,775
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               529,915
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  415,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   950
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,843
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,538
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,305
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,154)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,151
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service   

Nominations for the following properties being considered for listing in the National Register were received by the National Park Service before September 25, 2004. Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 written comments concerning the significance of these properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be submitted by October 27, 2004.   

Patrick W. Andrus,   

Acting, Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places.   

## GEORGIA   

## Harris County   

Thornton Plantation, 702 Piedmont Lake Rd. and 404 Hopkins Farm Rd., Pine Mountain, 04001212   

## Liberty County   

Bowens, Eddie, Farm, 660 Trade Hill Rd., Seabrook, 04001209   

## MASSACHUSETTS   

## Middlesex County   

Boutell—Hathorn House, 280 Wobun St., Wilmington, 04001210   

## NEW JERSEY   

## Bergen County   

Iviswold,   

223 Montross Ave., Rutherford, 04001213   

## OHIO   

## Summit County   

Cofta, Albert, Farmstead, (Agricultural Resources of the Cuyahoga Valley MPS) 2966 Brush Rd., Richfield, 04001214   

## VERMONT   

## Chittenden County   

Downtown Essex Junction Commercial Historic District, 3-17 and 8-12 Main St., 2-28 Railroad Ave., and 2 Railroad St., Essex Junction, 04001216   

## Windsor County   

Fletcher—Fullerton Farm, (Agricultural Resources of Vermont MPS) 3615 Fletcher Hill Rd. Extension, Woodstock, 04001215   

                        A request for REMOVAL has been received for the following resource:                                 ( print page 60642)    

## MINNESOTA   

## Wright County   

Simpson Methodist Episcopal Church (Wright County MRA) 4th and Linn Sts. Monticello, 79001276   

[FR Doc. 04-22771 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]   

BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   infomration  extracted  from
     Grandeur,  Inc. June 30, 1996 financial  statements and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894498
<NAME>                        Grandeur, Inc.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996

<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### Myra Scherer et al., Appellants, v. L. Bruce Moore, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 953.]
#77814141_v1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-cv-14210-RLR

DAVID POSCHMANN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CURRY ON FLEMING, LLC

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, DAVID POSCHMANN (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, CURRY ON FLEMING, LLC 

(“Defendant”), hereby file this Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, stating as follows:

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all parties jointly and voluntarily 

stipulate and agree that all claims, disputes, and controversies between Plaintiff and Defendant in the 

above-captioned action are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, and that each of Plaintiff and Defendant 

shall bear their own attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses of litigation. 

Dated: August 17, 2020

s/Drew M. Levitt

Drew M. Levitt, Esq. (FBN: 782246)

Email: drewmlevitt@gmail.com

Lee D. Sarkin, Esq. (FBN: 962848)

Email: Lsarkin@aol.com

4700 NW Boca Raton Blvd., #302 

Boca Raton, Florida 33431

Counsel for Plaintiff

s/Christine F. Gay______________ 

Christine Fuqua Gay (FBN 26009)

e-mail: christine.gay@hklaw.com

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP

701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 3300

Miami, Fl 33131

Phone (305) 789-7447/Fax (305) 789-7799 

Counsel for Defendant

Case 2:20-cv-14210-RLR Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2020 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 In
        connection with the Form 10-QSB of Quantitative Methods Corporation (the
        “Company”) on Form 10Q-SB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, HELGA
        LEUTHE Chief Financial/Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of
        2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 i.  The
        certifications required by (17
        CFR
        240.13a-14(b)) or (17
        CFR
        240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
        Code (18 U.S.C. 1350).
  ii.  A
        certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed "filed"
        for
        purposes of of
        the
        Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such
        certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
        filing
        under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
        small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
 
 
 
 /s/
        Helga
        Leuthe
 HELGA
        LEUTHE
 Chief
        Financial/Accounting Officer
 February
        13, 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40443

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN MARTINEZ-CATALAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-2099-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Martinez-Catalan (Martinez), appeals his guilty plea

conviction of, and sentence for, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by

illegally reentering the United States after deportation. He

argues, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000),

that the 48-month term of imprisonment imposed in his case

exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the § 1326(a)

offense charged in his indictment. He challenges the

constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and
No. 05-40443

-2-

aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than

elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. 

Martinez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although he contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have repeatedly

rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres

remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268,

276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Martinez

properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of

Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to

preserve it for further review. 

Martinez contends that the district court erred by ordering

him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition

of supervised release. As Martinez concedes, this claim is not

ripe for review on direct appeal. See United States v.

Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), petition

for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). The claim is

dismissed. See id. at 1102. 

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
**Exhibit 32.2**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly
report of Tayco Developments, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended November 30, 2003 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on
or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

|Date: January 13, 2004 | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough                     
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer
§ 3830.93 When are defects curable? ( a ) If there is a defect in your compliance with a statutory requirement, the defect is incurable if the statute does not give the Secretary authority to permit exceptions (*see* §§ 3830.91 and 3833.91 of this chapter). If your payment, recording, or filing has incurable defects, the affected mining claims or sites are statutorily forfeited.
( b ) If there is a defect in your compliance with a regulatory, but not statutory, requirement, the defect is curable. You may correct curable defects when BLM gives you notice. If you fail to cure the defect within the time BLM allows, you will forfeit your mining claims or sites.
[68 FR 61064, Oct. 24, 2003; 68 FR 74197, Dec. 23, 2003]
### **CHAPTER 25—GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO EMPLOYMENT TAXES**

Sec.
3501.
Collection and payment of taxes.
3502.
Nondeductibility of taxes in computing taxable income.
3503.
Erroneous payments.
3504.
Acts to be performed by agents.
3505.
Liability of third parties paying or providing for wages.
3506.
Individuals providing companion sitting placement services.
[3507.
Repealed.]
3508.
Treatment of real estate agents and direct sellers.
3509.
Determination of employer's liability for certain employment taxes.
3510.
Coordination of collection of domestic service employment taxes with collection of income taxes.
3511.
Certified professional employer organizations.
3512.
Treatment of certain persons as employers with respect to motion picture projects.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2015**—Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title III, §346(b), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3116, added item 3512.

**2014**—Pub. L. 113–295, div. B, title II, §206(d)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4071, added item 3511.

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–226, title II, §219(b)(3), Aug. 10, 2010, 124 Stat. 2403, struck out item 3507 "Advance payment of earned income credit".

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–387, §2(b)(2), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4074, added item 3510.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(b)(16), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–522, struck out item 3510 "Credit for increased social security employee taxes and railroad retirement tier 1 employee taxes imposed during 1984".

**1983**—Pub. L. 98–67 repealed amendments made by section 307 of Pub. L. 97–248. See 1982 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 98–21, title I, §123(b)(2), Apr. 20, 1983, 97 Stat. 88, added item 3510.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–248, title II, §§269(d), 270(b), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 553, 554, added items 3508 and 3509.

Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §§307(b)(5), 308(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 591, provided that, applicable to payments of interest, dividends, and patronage dividends paid or credited after June 30, 1983, the caption of chapter 25 is amended by inserting "AND COLLECTION OF INCOME TAXES AT SOURCE". Section 102(a), (b) of Pub. L. 98–67, title I, Aug. 5, 1983, 97 Stat. 369, repealed subtitle A (§§301–308) of title III of Pub. L. 97–248 as of the close of June 30, 1983, and provided that the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 [now 1986] [this title] shall be applied and administered (subject to certain exceptions) as if such subtitle A (and the amendments made by such subtitle A) had not been enacted.

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–600, title I, §105(b)(2), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2776, added item 3507.

**1977**—Pub. L. 95–171, §10(b), Nov. 12, 1977, 91 Stat. 1356, added item 3506.

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–719, title I, §105(c), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1139, added item 3505.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mrs. Thomas Fitzgerald, Appellant, against Thomas Crimmins Contracting Company et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

*933All concur.
### §6802. Supply and distribution

The Secretary shall furnish, without prepayment, to—

#### (1) Postmaster General

The Postmaster General a suitable quantity of adhesive stamps, coupons, tickets, or such other devices as may be prescribed by the Secretary pursuant to section 6302(b) or this chapter, to be distributed to, and kept on sale by, the various postmasters in the United States in all post offices of the first and second classes, and such post offices of the third and fourth classes as—

(A) are located in county seats, or

(B) are certified by the Secretary to the Postmaster General as necessary;

#### (2) Designated depositary of the United States

Any designated depositary of the United States a suitable quantity of adhesive stamps to be kept on sale by such designated depositary.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 829; Pub. L. 89–44, title VI, §601(d), June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 154; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(a)(36), (b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1829, 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing and substituted in par. (2) "designated depositary." for "designated depositary;".

1965—Par. (1). Pub. L. 89–44, §601(d)(1), struck out "(other than the stamps on playing cards)" after "quantity of adhesive stamps".

Par. (3). Pub. L. 89–44, §601(d)(2), struck out par. (3) which related to supply and distribution of stamps to State agents.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1965 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 89–44 to take effect in a manner consistent with effective date of change of tax provision to which related, see section 701(e) of Pub. L. 89–44, set out as a note under section 6103 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

Office of Postmaster General of Post Office Department abolished and all functions, powers, and duties of Postmaster General transferred to United States Postal Service by Pub. L. 91–375, §4(a), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 773, set out as a note under section 201 of Title 39, Postal Service.
EXHIBIT 23





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT





The
Board of Directors and Shareholders


ARAMARK Corporation:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements (Nos. 333-53163, 333-75870, 333-89118, 333-89120, 333-89122, 333-89124, 333-89126) on Form S-8 and registration
statement (No. 333-85050) on Form S-3 of ARAMARK Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated November 11, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of ARAMARK Corporation as of September 27, 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of income, cash flows and stockholders equity for the fiscal year then ended, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the September 27, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of ARAMARK
Corporation.





LOGO





Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 27, 2002