alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141981 

JESSICA MOYER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 141981 

 COA: 292061 

Jackson CC: 07-002182-CZ 

COMPREHENSIVE REHABILITATION 

CENTER, INC. and DOES 1-5, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 2:20-CV-14176-ROSENBERG/REID 

RICHARD SCOTT DOSS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WILLIAM D. SNYDER, MARTIN 

COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., 

Defendants. 

____________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING AND CLOSING CASE 

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge 

Lisette M. Reid. DE 7. Plaintiff filed a civil rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. DE 1. 

The Court referred this case to Judge Reid for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and 

for a Report and Recommendation on all dispositive matters. DE 2. Judge Reid ordered Plaintiff 

to file an Amended Complaint by July 4, 2020, cautioning him that failure to comply could result 

in the dismissal of this case. DE 4. Plaintiff has not filed an Amended Complaint to date. Thus, 

in the instant Report and Recommendation, Judge Reid recommends that this case be dismissed 

without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with Court Order. DE 7. 

Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for objecting has 

passed. 

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the record and is otherwise 

fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the analysis and conclusion in the Report and 

Recommendation and finds Judge Reid’s recommendation to be well reasoned and correct. 

Case 2:20-cv-14176-RLR Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. Magistrate Judge Reid’s Report and Recommendation [DE 7] is ADOPTED as the Order 

of the Court. 

2. This case is DISMSISED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and for 

failure to comply with Court Order. 

3. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to CLOSE THIS CASE. All deadlines are 

TERMINATED, all hearings are CANCELLED, and all motions are DENIED AS 

MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, West Palm Beach, Florida, this 31st day of 

August, 2020. 

 _______________________________ 

 ROBIN L. ROSENBERG 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies furnished to: 

Plaintiff 

Counsel of Record 

Case 2:20-cv-14176-RLR Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gamaliel SILVAN-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-40980.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Gamaliel Silvan-Garcia, Big Spring, TX, pro se.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender representing Gamaliel Silvan-Garcia has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Silvan-Garcia was informed of his right to file a response, but he has not done so. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Dorothy A. Joslyn, Respondent; Universal Laboratories, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [191 Mise. 512.]
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Kentucky Shakers

Activity FeeYes

## ** Tags

            -  shakers 
            -  american utopias 
            -  kentucky 
            -  national register of historic places 
            -  travel itineraries 
            -  travel shaker trail 

Photo by David Cornwell

While in Kentucky, remember to check out Kentucky’s Shaker history. Visit Shakertown at Pleasant Hill and South Union Shaker Village to learn about the development of Shakerism in the state.Pleasant Hill is managed by Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill. Visitors can explore the historic grounds and learn about the the Village’s unique Shaker architecture.South Union, managed by South Union Shaker Village, presents visitors with preserved Shaker buildings and artifacts. They also hold several special events and speaker series, such as seasonal dinners and seminars about Shaker life.

## ** Tags

        -  shakers 
        -  american utopias 
        -  kentucky 
        -  national register of historic places 
        -  travel itineraries 
        -  travel shaker trail 

Last updated: February 28, 2018

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
§ 6302.16 When and how may I gather scientific information about resources in BLM wilderness? ( a ) You may conduct research, including gathering information and collecting natural or cultural resources in wilderness areas, using methods that may cause greater impacts on the wilderness environment than allowed under § 6302.15(a), if— ( 1 ) Similar research opportunities are not reasonably available outside wilderness;
( 2 ) You carry out your proposed activity in a manner compatible with the preservation of the wilderness environment and conforming to the applicable management plan;
( 3 ) Any ground disturbance or removal of material is the minimum necessary for the scientific purposes of the research; and
( 4 ) You have an authorization from BLM.
( b ) You must reclaim disturbed areas, and BLM may require you to post a bond.
### [§452. Repealed. June 15, 1955, ch. 143, §1(a), 69 Stat. 134]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 152, related to prepaid income.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1953, and ending after Aug. 16, 1954, see section 3 of act June 15, 1955, set out as an Effective Date of 1955 Amendment note under section 381 of this title.

#### Savings Provision

For provisions concerning increase in tax in any taxable year ending on or before June 15, 1955 by reason of enactment of act June 15, 1955, see section 4 of act June 15, 1955, set out as a note under section 381 of this title.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Yellowstone
National Park
ID, MT, WY


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Audio Postcard - Singing Lake
 Snowy landscape view across frozen lake with mountain peaks in the distance.The Teton Mountain Range is seen across a frozen Yellowstone Lake. NPS / Jim Peaco

Singing Lake
It's December 17, 2013 and Yellowstone Lake is icing over. Maintenance Supervisor Bruce Sefton walks us down to the lake to listen to a rare, wintertime song.
Credit / Author:
NPS & MSU Acoustic Atlas/Jennifer Jerrett
Date created:
10/14/2020
Audio Transcript
Ah, we’re going to take you down to listen to the lake sing.  (Snowy footsteps and odd sounds coming from the frozen lake)This is, this doesn’t happen all the time. Fairly rare. So, so not many people hear this, because if there’s the tiniest bit of snow, the deal’s off. The sound’s all muffled.As this stuff freezes, and tightens, there’s there’s movement underneath, so this crack’ll start and it just goes. Takes off.(Windy reverb-like sound and snowy footsteps)And you’ll hear these sounds just like an F-16 coming right at you.(Echoing water sounds)When the sun comes up, it begins in earnest. When the sun goes down, it peters out. The activity will subside and stop. Get quiet.I’ve tried singing along, but it just doesn’t work too well. (Echoing water sounds) Nothing beats that.I’m Bruce Sefton and I’m with the maintenance division of the National Park Service here in the Lake District. Every day’s fun.This is Yellowstone National Park. Thanks for listening.

More Information
View of a still Yellowstone Lake shortly after sunrise, with the sky shades of blue and yellow.Yellowstone Lake
Delve into facts about North America's largest high-elevation lake.
A snowcoach on winter road.Visiting in Winter
Chilly but wonderful views and amazing solitude.
Underwater view of the lake floor, showing sand and gravel.Yellowstone Lake Geology
Discover a bit of what dynamic processes are going on below the lake's surface.
 Last updated: April 16, 2020
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: PO Box 168
Yellowstone National Park,
WY
82190-0168
 Phone: 307-344-7381 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of E Med Future, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President (principal financial officer), respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                      |  |                              
|------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Ochsendorf              |  | /s/ D. Dane Donohue          
|Robert J. Ochsendorf                  |  | D. Dane Donohue              
|PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  | EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT     
|                                      |  | (principal financial officer)



Date: May 14, 2004
**Exhibit 32(i)**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly report of Tayco Developments, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2003 to be filed with Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
P. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



|Date: October 13, 2003 | By: | /s/ Douglas P. Taylor                    
|---------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------
|                       |     | Douglas P. Taylor,Chief Executive Officer
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                     AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JULY 27, 2001


                  BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                       MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 2001-C


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A., the
Servicer in connection with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2001-C, do
hereby certify that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the
preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement, has been
made under my supervision, (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all material aspects its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                       BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv M95
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Isabel Osorio, Plaintiff,

v.

SGS North America, Inc., 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-22431-Civ-Scola

Order of Dismissal

The parties have dismissed this case with prejudice in accordance with

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Joint Stip. for Dismissal with 

Prejudice, ECF No. 9.) The Court directs the Clerk to close this case. All 

pending motions, if any, are denied as moot.

Done and ordered in chambers, at Miami, Florida, on October 13, 2020.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-22431-RNS Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2020 Page 1 of 1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00525-CV

In re David M. Haines

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Filed: March 2, 2010
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: October 20, 2008
    /s/ William D. GreenWilliam D. GreenChief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd,
general partner of Accenture SCA
(principal executive officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### §7402. Jurisdiction of district courts

#### (a) To issue orders, processes, and judgments

The district courts of the United States at the instance of the United States shall have such jurisdiction to make and issue in civil actions, writs and orders of injunction, and of ne exeat republica, orders appointing receivers, and such other orders and processes, and to render such judgments and decrees as may be necessary or appropriate for the enforcement of the internal revenue laws. The remedies hereby provided are in addition to and not exclusive of any and all other remedies of the United States in such courts or otherwise to enforce such laws.

#### (b) To enforce summons

If any person is summoned under the internal revenue laws to appear, to testify, or to produce books, papers, or other data, the district court of the United States for the district in which such person resides or may be found shall have jurisdiction by appropriate process to compel such attendance, testimony, or production of books, papers, or other data.

#### (c) For damages to United States officers or employees

Any officer or employee of the United States acting under authority of this title, or any person acting under or by authority of any such officer or employee, receiving any injury to his person or property in the discharge of his duty shall be entitled to maintain an action for damages therefor, in the district court of the United States, in the district wherein the party doing the injury may reside or shall be found.

#### [(d) Repealed. Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §230(d), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 209]

#### (e) To quiet title

The United States district courts shall have jurisdiction of any action brought by the United States to quiet title to property if the title claimed by the United States to such property was derived from enforcement of a lien under this title.

#### (f) General jurisdiction

**For general jurisdiction of the district courts of the United States in civil actions involving internal revenue, see section 1340 of title 28 of the United States Code.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 873; Pub. L. 89–719, title I, §107(a), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1140; Pub. L. 93–310, title II, §230(d), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 209.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1972—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 92–310 repealed subsec. (d) which granted district courts jurisdiction of actions brought on official bonds.

1966—Subsecs. (e), (f). Pub. L. 89–719 added subsec. (e) and redesignated former subsec. (e) as (f).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1966 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 89–719 applicable after Nov. 2, 1966, regardless of when title or lien of United States arose or when lien or interest of another person was acquired, with certain exceptions, see section 114(a)–(c) of Pub. L. 89–719, set out as a note under section 6323 of this title.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

20-14003-TP-MOORE/MAYNARD 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

vs. 

JAMES SAVAGE, 

 Defendant. 

_____________________________/ 

 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR COURT APPROVAL TO ENAGAGE IN 

EMPLOYMENT WHICH MAY BE RESTRICTED PURSUANT TO THE 

JUDGMENT OF REVOCATION 

 

 COMES NOW, the defendant, James Savage, by and through the undersigned 

attorney, and files this motion seeking the court’s permission to be employed by a 

company that is part of the defendant’s employment restrictions. In support of this motion 

states as follows: 

1. The defendant’s judgment contains restrictions and or the requirement that he 

obtain permission from the court for certain types of employment. (DE 38) 

2. The defendant has interviewed with the company, disclosed his past and current 

criminal history, and obtained a letter from the company regarding their 

willingness to limit what he does if employed there, and to properly supervise him. 

A copy of a letter from the company is attached. 

3. The defendant has no other leads right now for employment opportunities, and is 

seeking permission from the court to work at this company. 

 WHEREFORE, the defendant James Savage, respectfully requests that this Honorable 

Court grant the instant motion, and enter an Order allowing him to work at American 

Stimulus Funding Corporation. 

 /s/ Jack A. Fleischman 

 FLEISCHMAN & FLEISCHMAN, P.A. 

 Jack A. Fleischman 

 2161 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Ste. 403 

 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 

 Phone 561-585-3666 

 Fax 561-471-8343 

 Fla. Bar No.: 0714534 

 Email (CM/ECF): fflaws@gmail.com 

 Email (personal): jf@ffjustice.com 

Case 2:20-tp-14003-KMM Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2021 Page 1 of 6
2 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion was 

electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF and served this 19th day of 

July, 2021, on all counsel of record and the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Ft. Pierce, Florida, 

and United States Probation. 

 /s/Jack A. Fleischman______ 

 Jack A. Fleischman 

 

 cc: Client 

Case 2:20-tp-14003-KMM Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2021 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:20-tp-14003-KMM Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2021 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:20-tp-14003-KMM Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2021 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:20-tp-14003-KMM Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2021 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:20-tp-14003-KMM Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2021 Page 6 of 6
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6491** 

GEORGE PORTERFIELD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. AGENCY DIRECTOR WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR.; DR. JOHN TOMARCHIO; WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort
. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 9:13

- cv - 00497

- JMC )

Submitted : August 21, 2014 Decided: August 25, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. George Porterfield , Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt , MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER, LLC , Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees
. Unpublished opinions are not binding prece dent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George Porterfield appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Port er field v. Byars , No. 9:13

- cv - 00497

- JMC (D.S.C. Feb. 28, 2014). Porterfield’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED