alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16

- 1313 V

Filed: January 17, 2017

U NPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ELAINE ROSS , *

* Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder

* Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”)

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Carol L. Gallagher, Esquire, LLC, Linwood, NJ , for petitioner.

D arryl R. Wishard , U .S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On October 11, 2016

, Elaine Ross (“ p etitioner ”) filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et

seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”)

. Peti tioner alleges that s he su ffered a shoulder injur y from an influenza (“flu”) vaccin ation s he received on O ctober 22, 2014

. Petit ion at 1. The case

was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 17, 2017

, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) R eport conceding that petitioner is entitled to compensa tion. Rule 4(c) Rep

. at 1

. B ased on her evaluation of the evidence, respondent concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) , and that it was ca us ed by
the flu vaccin ation s he received on October 22 , 201 4

. Id. at 4 . Respondent did not identify any other causes for petitioner’s SIRVA, and petitioner’s records demonstrate
that s he suffered residual s of h er condition for more than six months. Id. Therefore,

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th

the E

- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Pr omotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

eas e of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id. at 4

- 5.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence of record

, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation

. The scope of damages to be awarded will be limited to petitioner ’ s left SIRVA and its related sequela.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                              [Company Letterhead]

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, DAVID HOPE, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of Auto-Q
International, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certifies that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended September 30, 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

         /s/ David Hope
-------------------------------------------

Name:        David Hope
         ----------------------------------

Date:        February 3, 2003
         ----------------------------------


                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
### [§6312. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–5, title I, §4(a)(2), Mar. 17, 1971, 85 Stat. 5]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 777, permitted the Secretary to receive Treasury bills, notes and certificates of indebtedness issued by the United States in payment of any internal revenue taxes or stamps.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 92–5, title I, §4(a), Mar. 17, 1971, 85 Stat. 5, provided that the repeal of this section is effective with respect to obligations issued after Mar. 3, 1971.

#### Repeals

Pub. L. 92–5, title I, §4(a)(2), Mar. 17, 1971, 85 Stat. 5, which repealed this section and provided for the effective date of that repeal, was itself repealed by Pub. L. 97–258, §5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1068, 1081.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Accenture SCA (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry L. You, Chief
Financial Officer of Accenture Ltd, the general partner of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ HARRY L. YOUHarry L. YouChief Financial Officer of Accenture LtdNovember 13, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### Kate Patterson, Respondent, v. The City of New York and the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellants.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs, as to the appellant the City of Hew York. Ho opinion. Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event as to the appellant the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, upon the ground that, in the absence of evidence by plaintiff that the ear could have been stopped after the motorman had notice of the impending danger, no question of fact was raised which justified the court in submitting the question of said appellant’s negligence to the jury. *(Albrecht*v. *Rochester, Syracuse & E. R. R. Co.,*205 N. Y. 230.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ'., concurred.
HomeAbout NRCEmergency Preparedness & ResponseAbout NRC Emergency Response

# Response to Hurricanes

The NRC closely monitors tropical storms and hurricanes as they approach the U.S. mainland. If projections show possible storm impacts on a coastline within about five days, one or more of NRC's four Regional Offices (Region I in King of Prussia, PA; Region II in Atlanta, GA; Region III in Lisle, IL; and Region IV in Arlington, TX) will begin round-the-clock hurricane tracking using U.S. government (e.g. National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service) and commercial weather forecasting services.

NRC Regions located in the projected storm path will staff the Regional Incident Response Center and provide status updates on preparedness activities. To ensure continuous communications with all NRC-licensed facilities, NRC Regions will send staff to potentially affected sites to supplement NRC resident inspectors.

NRC staff head to relevant State Emergency Operations Centers about 48 hours before hurricane-force winds are expected to arrive at the licensee site. NRC Regional and Headquarters response personnel will be ready to respond to any storm-induced emergency. The agency also conducts additional testing of normal and backup communications channels during this time.

About 12 hours before hurricane-force winds could arrive at the licensee site, the NRC begins round-the-clock operations, with continuous status updates from all nuclear facilities in the hurricane's path. The NRC also maintains communications links with State emergency response officials and other Federal response agencies.

As the hurricane passes, the NRC maintains close contact with the licensee staff and with NRC inspection staff on site. Backup communications systems are available and used if necessary.

After the storm, the NRC helps assess any damage to the facility and, if necessary, responds to any storm-induced problems. NRC also works closely with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to determine when offsite emergency response organizations are ready to resume normal (day-to-day) response planning activities.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 13, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Response Modes
          - Response to Hurricanes
          - State and Local Response Actions
          - Nuclear Facility Response
          - Emergency Preparedness in Response to Terrorism

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 13, 2020
Sacramento

River

TTEE HHAA MM AA CC OO

T27N R3W

9

16

4

8

10

3

17 15

5

196.55 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-4010A-R-1

Exhibit B

Gjermann, Hal

725-202-57

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.25 0.5

Miles

Date: November 8, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\gjermann_hal\gjermann_hal.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
#### § 113.100 Purpose and effective date.

The purpose of these Title IX regulations is to effectuate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (except sections 904 and 906 of those Amendments) (20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1683, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688), which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in these Title IX regulations. The effective date of these Title IX regulations shall be September 29, 2000.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Sophia L. Cauldwell, Deceased. State Tax Commission; Chase National Bank of the City of New York, as Executor and Trustee.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
HomeAbout NRCCareer OpportunitiesWorking at NRCNRC Ethics

# Ethics Program Reviews

Federal statutes and regulations require the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and other Government agencies to institute an ethics program to inspire employees to fulfill the highest ideals of public service and to prevent and detect any ethics violations. To assess the effectiveness and integrity of such programs, the U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) conducts regular reviews of each agency’s ethics program. These reviews are a vital means to measure both agency compliance with Federal ethics requirements and the effectiveness of the agency’s program in preventing the occurrence of ethics violations.

To date, the OGE has conducted four reviews of the NRC’s ethics program. In accordance with Section 402 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended, these reviews focused on the NRC’s financial disclosure systems, ethics education and training, and advice and counseling services.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Summaries of Major Ethics Rules
          - Laws, Regulations and Policies
          - Ethics Forms
          - Ethics Program Reviews
          - List of Prohibited Securities
          - Other Ethics Sites

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, July 8, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            6,180
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            2,846
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                      0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      51,008
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                  0
<LOANS>                                         155,051
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2,897
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  222,594
<DEPOSITS>                                      136,728
<SHORT-TERM>                                     48,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3,933
<LONG-TERM>                                      13,668
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             18
<OTHER-SE>                                       19,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  222,594
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   3,377
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   962
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     30
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  4,369
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                1,652
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,637
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             1,732
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     1,035
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (33)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   1,074
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (82)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         (82)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (35)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     3.29
<LOANS-NON>                                         902
<LOANS-PAST>                                          0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                      0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1,961
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       136
<RECOVERIES>                                         37
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2,897
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2,060
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             837



</TABLE>
Exhibit 14

                                 Code of Ethics
      For Chief Executive Officer, President and Senior Financial Officers
                              of AJS Bancorp, Inc.

      It is the policy of AJS Bancorp, Inc. that the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), President and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO")
of AJS Bancorp, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") adhere to and
advocate the following principles governing their professional and ethical
conduct in the fulfillment of their responsibilities:

      1. Act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts
between his or her personal, private interests and the interests of the Company,
including receiving improper personal benefits as a result of his or her
position

      2. Perform responsibilities with a view to causing periodic reports and
other documents filed with the SEC to contain information which is accurate,
complete, fair and understandable.

      3. Comply with laws of federal, state, and local governments applicable to
the Company, and the rules and regulations of private and public regulatory
agencies having jurisdiction over the Company.

      4. Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, and diligence, without
misrepresenting or omitting material facts or allowing independent judgment to
be compromised.

      5. Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
the performance of his or her responsibilities except when authorized or
otherwise legally obligated to disclose. Do not use confidential information
acquired in the course of the performance of his or her responsibilities for
personal advantage.

      6. Proactively promote ethical behavior among subordinates and peers.

      7. Use corporate assets and resources employed or entrusted in a
responsible manner.

      8. Do not use corporate information, corporate assets, corporate
opportunities or one's position with the Company for personal gain. Do not
compete directly or indirectly with the Company.

      9. Comply in all respects with the Company's Standards of Conduct and Code
of Ethics, and this Code of Ethics.

      10. Advance the Company's legitimate interests when the opportunity
arises.


                                     Page 1
<PAGE>

Exhibit 14

      It is also the Policy of AJS Bancorp, Inc. that the Chairman and CEO,
President and CFO of the Company acknowledge and certify to the foregoing
annually and file a copy of such certification with [each of] the Audit
Committee [and the Corporate Governance Committee of the Board.]

      The Corporate Governance Committee shall have the power to monitor, make
determinations, and recommend action to the Board with respect to violations of
this Policy, except for paragraph 2, 3 and 4 with respect to which the Audit
Committee shall have such power.


                                     Page 2
### §143. Vacant judgeship as affecting proceedings

When the office of a district judge becomes vacant, all pending process, pleadings and proceedings shall, when necessary, be continued by the clerk until a judge is appointed or designated to hold such court.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 898.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §26 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §22, 36 Stat. 1090).

The last clause of section 26 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940, ed., prescribing the powers of a designated judge was omitted as covered by section 296 of this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Order entered August 19, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01658-CV

SULMA GONZALES, Appellant

V.

THE DALLAS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-09665

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 7, 2014 “Motion to Appoint a Pro-Bono Appeal 

Attorney and for a Humanitarian Assistance for the Sake of Justice, In the Alternative, Motion 

for Extension of Time” and appellees’ response in opposition. This Court does not appoint 

counsel. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion to the extent she requests appointment of 

counsel and humanitarian assistance.

With respect to appellant’s request for alternative relief, this is her second request for an 

extension of time to file her brief. We GRANT appellant’s request for an extension of time. 

Appellant shall file her brief on or before SEPTEMBER 18, 2014. We caution appellant that 

failure to file her brief on or before SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 may result in dismissal of her 

appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(b).

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Philip Gay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Grill Concepts, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Grill Concepts, Inc.


                                   By:   /s/ Philip Gay
                                         -----------------------
                                   Name:  Philip Gay
                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer and
                                          Executive Vice President
                                   May 27, 2005


<PAGE>
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of General Motors Corporation (the
      "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Sean
      Yaakov Fulda _,
      Principal Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.





By /s/
      Sean Yaakov Fulda




Sean
      Yaakov Fulda


Principal
      Executive Officer


October
      30, 2007




12