alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 FORM 10-Q OF ARGOSY GAMING COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          37,702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,685
<INVENTORY>                                        966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,974
<PP&E>                                         513,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                 122,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 529,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,236
<BONDS>                                        320,577
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           282
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   529,771
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               438,562
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  349,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   754
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,707
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,930
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (38,420)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,490)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)


</TABLE>
IRR 2004 Sch B-3B F.z08.XLS

1/23/2006

SCHEDULE OF IRRIGATION VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS TO BE APPLIED IN FY 2005 ACCOUNTING

2006 IRRIGATION WATER RATES

(REFLECTED IN 2006 DEFICIT/CAPITAL RATES)

Voluntary Voluntary Payments

Date Payments Deficit to Capital 

Facility/Contractor Received Applied to in FY 2005 Sch A-6B to Sch A-2B 

Colusa Basin Drain

Colusa Drain MWC 7/27/05 IB/05 21,153.32 21,153.32 

Delta-Mendota Pool

James ID 11/26/04 Refund 13,657.91 James ID 11/26/04 Refund 16,980.19 

Total Delta-Mendota Pool 30,638.10 0.00 

Sacramento River - Willows

Furlan Jnt Vntr 11/2/04 IB/03 85.55 85.55 Hiatt, T 8/31/05 IB/05 882.27 882.27 Howald Farms Inc 11/22/04 IB/02,03 11,577.04 11,577.04 Howald Farms Inc 7/21/05 IB/04 8,639.50 8,639.50 Lockett, W & J 11/13/03 IB/05 45.66 45.66 Oji Brothers Farm, Inc 11/12/04 IB/03 586.65 586.65 Oji Brothers Farm, Inc 7/27/05 IB/04 6,593.45 6,593.45 Pleasant Grove -Verona MWC 5/31/05 IB/88-98 133,494.11 133,494.11 Pleasant Grove -Verona MWC 5/31/05 IB/01 4,801.28 4,801.28 Recl Dist #1000 8/18/04 IB/05 130.63 130.63 Recl Dist #1004 12/27/04 IB/03, 04 196,716.34 196,716.34 River Garden Farms 10/14/04 IB/03 5,432.39 5,432.39 Siddiqui, J & A 10/15/04 IB/03 330.22 330.22 Sycamore Family Trust 8/19/05 IB/04 58,752.64 58,752.64 Tisdale Irr & Drain Co 2/11/05 IB/99,00 31,761.41 31,761.41 Wirth, M 8/8/05 IB/04 1,297.49 1,297.49 Wisler, J 10/28/04 IB/90-93,96,03 691.47 691.47 

Total Sacramento River- Willows 461,818.10 461,818.10 0.00 
IRR 2004 Sch B-3B F.z08.XLS 

1/23/2006 

SCHEDULE OF IRRIGATION VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS TO BE APPLIED IN FY 2005 ACCOUNTING

2006 IRRIGATION WATER RATES

(REFLECTED IN 2006 DEFICIT/CAPITAL RATES)

Voluntary Voluntary Payments

Date Payments Deficit to Capital 

Facility/Contractor Received Applied to in FY 2005 Sch A-6B to Sch A-2B 

San Luis Canal - Fresno

Westlands WD 9/20/05 Capital 1,723,740.05 1,723,740.05 1

Tehama-Colusa Canal

Colusa County WD 2/4/05 IB/93,95 301,921.69 301,921.69 Colusa County WD 2/18/05 IB/93,94 2,500.00 2,500.00 Colusa County WD 10/1/04 HIB 32,651.63 1/ 32,651.63 Orland-Artois WD 10/23/04 NIB, Refund 6,150.25 3,578.77 

Total Tehama-Colusa Canal 343,223.57 340,652.09 0.00 

Total 2,580,573.14 823,623.51 1,723,740.05 2

LEGEND:

CFO - Chief Financial Officer/Provision for Replacement Net Audit Adjustment IB- Interest Bearing NIB - Non-Interest Bearing

FOOTNOTES:1/ Westside WD's FY 2004 O&M surplus overpayment was transferred and applied as a FY 2005 voluntary payment for Colusa County WD at the b2/ Overpayment to be refunded at the contractor's request.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |
|----------------------------------------|
| Keith                Berman            |
| Chief                Financial Officer |

----
Parraguirre 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

TRINITY CHRISTINA WALLMAN, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

DWIGHT NEVEN, WARDEN, 

Respondent. 

No. 83391 

FILE 

SEP 0 9 2021 

ELIZAPE 9 A. BROWN 

CLEP.1ç t PREME COU 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

BY DEPU7Y CLERK 

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a "rnotion to 

reconsider previous attorney to surrender full case file." Eighth Judicial 

District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge. 

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from this 

order, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 

1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

 , J 

Stiglich 

, J. 

Silver 

cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge 

Trinity Christina Wallman 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

t—Z. 6 IS 0
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,781
<INVENTORY>                                      4,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,002
<PP&E>                                         761,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                 258,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 601,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          446,469
<BONDS>                                        338,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,004
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   601,987
<SALES>                                        261,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               261,435
<CGS>                                          225,607
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    50
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    659
<INCOME-TAX>                                       212
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                447
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       447
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

****

**CERTIFICATION**



******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly
report of Tayco Developments, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended November 30, 2003 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on
or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas P. Taylor, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.



|Date: January 13, 2004 | By: | /s/ Douglas P. Taylor                    
|---------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------
|                       |     | Douglas P. Taylor,Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

****

**CERTIFICATION**

******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly
report of Tayco Developments, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended August 31, 2004 to be filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934



|Date: October 13, 2004 | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough                     
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert O. Carr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

          1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 7, 2006

|   | /s/  Robert O. Carr  |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   |                           |
|   | Robert O.   Carr          |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer |
#### § 49.35 How will the bureaus foster public education and awareness?

The bureaus will establish programs to increase public awareness about the significance of paleontological resources on or from Federal land. This effort will be coordinated with other agencies, non-Federal partners, the scientific community, and the general public where appropriate and practicable.
#### § 48.35 When must the Secretary determine if the proposed amendment requires Congressional approval?

The Secretary will review the documents submitted by the Chairman, and if they meet the requirements of § 48.15, the Secretary will determine within 60 days after receiving them if the proposed amendment requires Congressional approval.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           7,939
<SECURITIES>                                    16,854
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,423
<PP&E>                                           5,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,617
<BONDS>                                            263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                        91,027
<OTHER-SE>                                    (77,039)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,911
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,855
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,049)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,049)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,049)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.55)
        

</TABLE>
Insert Map

Rules for Resources

Logos and Attribution
#### Tatum *et al. v.*Hawkins.

September 21, 1910.

Complaint. Before Judge Gilbert. Muscogee superior court. March 16, 1909.

*J. E. Chapman*and *G. Y. Harrell,*for plaintiffs in error.

*A.*IF. *Cozart*and *Wynn £ Wohhvender,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

1. The requests to charge, in so far as applicable under the pleadings and evidence, were covered by the general charge.

2. The exceptions to rulings on the admissibility of evidence, and to the charge of the court, were without merit.

3. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and the discretion of the judge in refusing to grant a new trial will not be disturbed. .

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 8342.1 Designation criteria. The authorized officer shall designate all public lands as either open, limited, or closed to off-road vehicles. All designations shall be based on the protection of the resources of the public lands, the promotion of the safety of all the users of the public lands, and the minimization of conflicts among various uses of the public lands; and in accordance with the following criteria: ( a ) Areas and trails shall be located to minimize damage to soil, watershed, vegetation, air, or other resources of the public lands, and to prevent impairment of wilderness suitability.
( b ) Areas and trails shall be located to minimize harassment of wildlife or significant disruption of wildlife habitats. Special attention will be given to protect endangered or threatened species and their habitats.
( c ) Areas and trails shall be located to minimize conflicts between off-road vehicle use and other existing or proposed recreational uses of the same or neighboring public lands, and to ensure the compatibility of such uses with existing conditions in populated areas, taking into account noise and other factors.
( d ) Areas and trails shall not be located in officially designated wilderness areas or primitive areas. Areas and trails shall be located in natural areas only if the authorized officer determines that off-road vehicle use in such locations will not adversely affect their natural, esthetic, scenic, or other values for which such areas are established.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7825

ROBERT VIZZINI, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-1359-8-AW) Submitted: April 28, 2004 Decided: May 6, 2004 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Lawrence Gitomer, LAW OFFICE OF MARK GITOMER, Owings Mills, Maryland, for Appellant. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert Vizzini, a Maryland inmate, seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Respondent’s motion for reconsideration and dismissing as untimely Vizzini’s petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vizzini has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4942 

To amend the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 

2004 to require the establishment of an additional Institute under that 

Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004 to require the establishment of an 

additional Institute under that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Watershed Restoration 

5 Initiative Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL INSTITUTE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5(b)(2) of the Southwest 

8 Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004 (16 

9 U.S.C. 6704(b)(2)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4942 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(D) the State of Utah.’’. 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 5(e)(1) of 

8 the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act 

9 of 2004 (16 U.S.C. 6704(e)(1)) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘and Colorado’’ and inserting ‘‘Colorado, and Utah’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Wupatki
National Monument
Arizona


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Pets
 A park ranger kneels with a dog on leash in front of himA Park Ranger with his service dog.Because the pueblos are ancient and fragile, pets are not permitted on any trails. Only service animals recognized under the ADA are permitted inside monument buildings or on trails. 
When you visit Wupatki National Monument, remember to B.A.R.K.
Bag your pet’s poop. Help keep your national park clean by collecting and disposing of all pet waste. A pet waste station with bags is located next to Visitor Center.
Always keep your pet on a leash. For the safety and comfort of all the park’s visitors, keep your pets on a leash six feet (1.8m) or less in length
Respect wildlife. Wupatki can be home to migrating birds, rabbits, lizards, snakes, and other wildlife. Please keep your dog at a respectful distance from any animals you may encounter.
Know where you can go. Pets are allowed on any paved road or parking lot in the monument. Only ADA recognized service animals can be on trails or inside monument buildings.**Please, *never* leave your pet in a vehicle, as desert temperatures can quickly cause heat stroke and death.**
Shaded areas can be found just outside the front and back of the Visitor Center where someone in your group can wait with your pet while other members of your party walk the Wupatki Pueblo trail. Visitor Center staff can provide water for your pet if needed.

A visitor with her dog on the Doney Mountain trail.Doney Mountain is a Coconino National Forest site and is pet friendly. Photo by - C. Cooksey**Pet Friendly Areas Nearby**
**Sunset Crater National Monument**
Paved section of the Lava Flow Trail
USFS section of Lava's Edge trail (from visitor center to NPS boundary)**Bonito Campground (USFS)**
See campground website for details**Coconino National Forest**
See NF website for details
Painted Desert Vista and surrounding wilderness areas
Doney Picnic Area and trails - this location is halfway between the Wupatki Visitor Center and the north entrance/exit to the Monument.**Flagstaff**
Many stores and resturants have outdoor pet friendly areas. Other trails and parks include:
Buffalo Park
AZ National Scenic Trail
Bushmaster Park (designated off-leash dog area)
Thorpe Park Bark Park
Lake Mary (Coconino NF)
 Last updated: November 9, 2023
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 6400 U.S. 89
Flagstaff,
AZ
86004
 Phone: 928-679-2365 Contact Us
 Tools Site Index
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr