alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.11

                         ADDENDUM TO TERM LOAN AGREEMENT

This Addendum is made part of the Term Loan Agreement (the "Agreement") made and
entered into by and between the  undersigned  borrower (the  "Borrower") and the
undersigned  bank (the "Bank") as of the date identified  below. The warranties,
covenants and other terms described below are hereby added to the Agreement.

BORROWER'S SUBMISSION OF TAX RETURNS

Borrower covenants and agrees with Bank that, while this Agreement is in effect,
Borrower will furnish to Bank, no later than October 31 of each year, Borrower's
personal  financial  statement  for such yearly  period and no later than thirty
(30) days after filing there, a copy of Borrower's filed federal,  and state [if
applicable], tax returns, including all supporting schedules.

Borrower to maintain a minimum Cash Flow  Coverage  ratio of 1.25 to 1.00.  Cash
Flow Coverage  defined as: Total annual personal income as stated in federal tax
returns, divided by personal debt obligations.

GUARANTOR'S SUBMISSION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND TAX RETURNS

Borrower covenants and agrees with Bank that, while this Agreement is in effect,
Guarantor will furnish to Bank the following: 1) As soon as available, but in no
event later than sixty (60) days after the end of each quarter,  Guarantor's CPA
reviewed  financial  statements  for  such  quarterly  period.  2)  As  soon  as
available, but in no event later than one hundred twenty (120) days after fiscal
year end, a copy of Guarantor's CPA audited financial statements.

Accounts Payable and Accounts  Receivable agings to be provided quarterly within
twenty (20) days of quarter end.

Full   proceeds  of  this  loan  are  to  be  used  to  payoff  the   obligation
#71-6517305943-18/26 of, Nutech Digital, Inc. with U.S. Bank.

Dated as of:               November 7, 2002


/s/ Lee Kasper
-----------------------
(Borrower)       Lee


U.S. Bank N.A. (Bank:)


/s/ Gus Ghusayni
----------------------------
Gus Ghusayni, Vice PResident



                                  Page 9 of 19


<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2003, of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert G. Phillips, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                     /s/ Robert G. Phillips
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Robert G. Phillips
                                     Chairman of the Board and
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     (Principal Executive Officer)
                                     GulfTerra Energy Partners, L. P.

                                     November 3, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. and will be retained by GulfTerra
Energy Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.609 What is the difference between a fee and an expense?

A fee is a charge to you for the professional services of attorneys, agents, or expert witnesses rendered in connection with your case. An expense is the cost to you of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project, or similar matter prepared in connection with your case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          70,567               1,452,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,891,143               9,432,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                   124,086                 124,086
<INVENTORY>                                  4,186,833               4,035,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,495,732              16,002,051
<PP&E>                                       1,723,174               1,552,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                 978,735                 871,977
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,471,314              18,327,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,408,538               7,555,703
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         5,761                   5,761
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,057,015              10,765,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,471,314              18,327,115
<SALES>                                     12,611,492              12,380,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,611,492              12,380,422
<CGS>                                        9,215,768               8,487,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,215,768               8,487,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,286,634               3,138,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             175,260                (75,856)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,066,170)                 830,490
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (332,904)                 274,224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (733,266)                 556,266
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)                     .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)                     .07
        

</TABLE>
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Tonto
National Monument
Arizona


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Operating Hours & Seasons
 Tonto National Monument Hours:
Normal Operations (September 1-May 31):
Open: Friday to Tuesday.
Closed: Wednesday and Thursday.
**Visitor Center** is open Friday to Tuesday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Closed on Wednesdays, Thursdays, Thanksgiving, Christmas Day, and New Year's Day. The visitor center will close early at 3 p.m. on Christmas Eve and New Year's Eve. **The Lower Cliff Dwelling Trail** open Friday to Tuesday from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. **You must start your hike before 4 p.m.** On Christmas Eve and New Year's Eve you must start your hike before 2 p.m. The monument is busiest on the weekends and it is recommended to visit mornings or weekdays. Park staff may close the trail to the Lower Cliff Dwelling due to safety concerns such as lightning, flooding, bee activity, or heat. 
During summer months (June, July, and August), the Lower Cliff Dwelling trail is open from 8:00 a.m. to noon. **You must start your hike before noon.****The Upper Cliff Dwelling Trail** is *only* accessible by guided tour November through April. Tours are limited, and you must have a reservation. Reservations open October 1st for the season. To make a reservation, you must call (928) 467-2241. For additional information, visit the Guided Tours page.
 Last updated: April 30, 2024
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 26260 N AZ Hwy 188 Lot 2
Roosevelt,
AZ
85545
 Phone: 928 467-2241 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7732

MICHAEL GENE JORDAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Correction; GEORGE

KENWORTHY, Superintendent, Lumberton

Correctional Center,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:06-hc-02025)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 22, 2007 

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Gene Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Gene Jordan seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jordan has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
No. 13,169.

#### White *v.*Hurst et al.

(14 P. [2d] 1119)

Decided September 12, 1932.

Messrs. Blaine *&*Feighner, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. McMullin, Sternberg & Helman, for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 397

**Question 397:** After implementation of the revised 10 CFR Part 20, should nuclear power plant licensees report total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) or deep dose equivalent (DDE) as the "whole body dose" for annual reports submitted in accordance with reactor technical specifications and Regulatory Guide 1.16?

**Answer:** Deep dose equivalent. 

(Reference: Reactor Technical Specifications, Regulatory Guide 1.16)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, November 27, 2017
#### Charles J. Weibert, Appellant, v. Herbert W. Hanan, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
#### Benjamin FORSYTHE, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. James A. COLLINS et al., Defendants-Respondents.

No. 96-00143.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 1996.

Benjamin Edwin Forsythe, New Boston, TX, pro se.

Jacqueline Lee Haney, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for Defendants-Respondents.

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Benjamin Forsythe, # 521748, petitions this court for permission to file an interlocutory appeal of the district court’s order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the defendants in Forsythe’s civil rights complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Subsequent to filing his petition in this court, Forsythe moved in the district court to have his complaint withdrawn. In light of the district court’s order granting Forsythe’s motion and dismissing his complaint, Forsythe’s interloeutory appeal is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
#### § 429.29 What other terms and conditions may be included in my use authorization?

Reclamation may include additional terms, conditions, or requirements that address environmental law compliance, the protection of cultural and natural resources, other interests of the United States, and local laws and regulations.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


World War I





Contact Us
  Lesson Plans
 Sort By:RelevanceRecently UpdatedDate ReleasedTitle
 Show1040 per page
   wwi world war i ww i world war one
 Last updated: July 24, 2020
 Parks
 Preparing for War
 Fighting the War
 Society and Politics
 Tools Calendar
Teachers
Site Index
Contact Us


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.913 New evidence.

Disputes under this subpart ordinarily will be decided based on the pleadings and the administrative record. The Judge may admit additional evidence upon a motion establishing good cause.
#### § 4300.20 How do I apply for a permit?

You must execute a completed application for a grazing permit (Form 4201-1) and file it in the BLM office with jurisdiction over the lands for which you are applying.
#### § 113.210 Military and merchant marine educational institutions.

These Title IX regulations do not apply to an educational institution whose primary purpose is the training of individuals for a military service of the United States or for the merchant marine.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan CISNEROS-COLCHADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40567.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern Dis*290trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Cisneros-Colchado raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance, is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### J. K. Hastie v. James W. Collins.

At the October Term, 1882, of the district court of Sumner county, *Collins*had judgment against *Hastie,*who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

*Herrick & George,*for plaintiff in error.

*McDonald & Parker,*for defendant in error.

*Per Curiam:*

This action was originally brought by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against plaintiff in error, defendant below, before a justice of the peace, in the city of Wellington, in Sumner county, to recover damages on account of the alleged trespassing by stock upon a growing wheat crop, and also to recover the expenses of keeping such trespassing cattle. The case was twice tried before a justice of the peace, by a jury. Upon the first trial the jury failed to agree. On the second trial the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff below, and assessed his damages at the sum of fifty dollars, and also the further sum of twenty-two dollars and fifty cents for keeping the cattle taken up by him while trespassing. Judgment was rendered upon the verdict, and the case taken to the district court upon a petition in error. That court affirmed the judgment rendered by the justice of the peace, and the plaintiff in error, defendant below, brings the case here to reverse the judgment of affirmance.

If any errors were committed in the final trial before the • justice of the peace, they concern instructions asked for, and instructions given, but excépted to. Conceding that the jury were improperly directed, and that the instructions asked for ought to have been given, it was the duty of the district court to affirm the judgment of the justice of the peace under the petition presented to it, and it is our duty likewise to affirm its judgment. (Theilen v. *Hann,*27 Kas. 778; *Thompson v. Brooks,*29 id. 504.)

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5179 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require congressional 

approval of certain actions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 1, 2022 

Mr. MARSHALL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require 

congressional approval of certain actions, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL OF CERTAIN AC4 TIONS. 

5 Section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 

6 (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(4) A listing, removal from a list, or change in 

9 status of any species under this subsection shall take 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5179 IS

1 effect upon enactment of a congressional joint reso2 lution of approval.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 05-11] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/OPS-ADMIN, (703) 604-6575

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 05-11 with attached transmittal, policy justification, Sensitivity of Technology, and Section 620C(d).

Dated: October 8, 2004.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 61209)          ( print page 61210)          ( print page 61211)          ( print page 61212)          ( print page 61213)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 04-23118 Filed 10-14-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
EXHIBIT 99.1


                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insightful
Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, the undersigned, Shawn F.
Javid, President and Chief Executive Officer of Insightful Corporation, and
Sarwat H. Ramadan, Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial
Officer of Insightful Corporation, do each hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1)   such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
          the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Insightful Corporation.




Date:  August 12, 2002                 By:     /s/    Shawn F. Javid
     -----------------                    --------------------------------------
                                                      Shawn F. Javid
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:  August 12, 2002                 By:     /s/  SARWAT H. RAMADAN
     -----------------                    --------------------------------------
                                                    Sarwat H. Ramadan
                                        Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
                                                  Treasurer and Secretary


<PAGE>
#### § 114.101 What do these regulations cover?

This part applies only to monetary claims you assert under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 2671 *et seq.,* for injury to or loss of property, personal injury, or death arising from the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any SBA employee acting within the scope of his or her employment.