Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 3 / Tuesday, January 6, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 533

paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), 

(e)(3)(i)(A), and (e)(3)(i)(B); redesignate 

paragraphs (e)(3)(i)(C) and (e)(3)(i)(D) as 

paragraphs (e)(3)(i)(D) and (e)(3)(i)(E), 

respectively; and add new paragraphs 

(e)(3)(i)(C) and (e)(5) to read as follows:

§ 12.02–27 Requirements for renewal of a 

merchant mariner’s document. 

(a) General. Except as provided in 

paragraph (g) of this section, an 

applicant for renewal of a merchant 

mariner’s document shall establish 

possession of all of the necessary 

qualifications before the document is 

renewed. The Coast Guard will not 

process an application until the 

applicant has submitted a complete 

application package that complies with 

the requirements of § 12.02–9. A request 

for a renewed merchant mariner’s 

document may be denied for any reason 

listed in § 12.02–4. 

(1) Each application for a merchant 

mariner’s document must be made on 

form CG–719B furnished by the Coast 

Guard and be accompanied by the 

evaluation fee (including examination 

and issuance fees when required) 

established in Table 12.02–18 of 

§ 12.02–18. Each application must 

contain all necessary proofs of 

qualifications, identity, and citizenship 

or nationality. It must be current and 

up-to-date with respect to service, the 

physical examination, and all other 

pertinent matters. 

(2) The applicant may apply either in 

person at any Regional Examination 

Center listed in § 12.01–7(a) or by mail 

under paragraph (e)(3) of this section. 

(3) Each applicant who elects to 

renew by mail shall submit the 

merchant mariner’s document with his 

or her application. If a document is 

submitted, it will not be returned to the 

applicant. A photocopy of a merchant 

mariner’s document showing both the 

front and the back of the document may 

be submitted in place of the existing 

document.

* * * * *

(e) * * *

(3) * * *

(i) * * *

(A) A completed application and the 

evaluation fee (including examination 

and issuance fees when required) 

established in Table 12.02–18 in 

§ 12.02–18. 

(B) The document to be renewed, or, 

if it has not expired, a photocopy of it, 

showing both the front and the back. 

(C) A copy (both front and back if the 

credentials are printed on two sides) of 

two credentials deemed acceptable 

proofs of identity in § 12.02–12, one of 

which must be a photo identification.

* * * * *

(5) Each applicant applying for 

renewal by mail must appear in person 

at an REC at least one time during the 

application process to obtain a renewed 

merchant mariner’s document. At that 

time, the applicant must show the same 

proofs of identity submitted with the 

application package as required by 

paragraph (e)(3)(i)(C) of this section. No 

other proofs of identity will be accepted. 

At the time the applicant appears in 

person at the REC, the applicant shall 

provide fingerprints in a form and 

manner specified by the Coast Guard. 

The applicant shall return the expired 

or expiring document to the Coast 

Guard. If the applicant has applied in 

person, shown the proofs of identity, 

submitted the expired or expiring 

document with the application, and 

provided fingerprints, then the renewed 

document may be mailed to an address 

provided by the applicant. * * *

Dated: December 29, 2003. 

Thomas H. Gilmour, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant 

Commandant for Marine Safety, Security and 

Environmental Protection.

[FR Doc. 03–32318 Filed 12–31–03; 12:19 

pm] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–U

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

46 CFR Parts 401 and 404

[USCG–2002–11288] 

RIN 2115–AG30

Rates for Pilotage on the Great Lakes

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Correction to interim rule.

SUMMARY: This document contains 

corrections to the interim rule [USCG–

2002–11288], which was published in 

the Federal Register on December 12, 

2003 (68 FR 69564). The interim rule 

provides a partial rate adjustment for 

pilotage on the Great Lakes. A review of 

this interim rule after publication 

identified an omission of a figure in a 

table and two erroneous tables.

DATES: Effective on January 6, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

questions on this correction notice, call 

or e-mail Paul Wasserman, Director, 

Office of Great Lakes Pilotage (G–MW–

1), U.S. Coast Guard, at telephone 202–

267–2856, or pwasserman@

comdt.uscg.mil.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Need for Correction 

The interim rule, as published, 

contained an erroneous figure for the 

total of District One’s Projected Return 

on Investment. This was due to the 

omission of a number in the column 

designated as ‘‘Total District One.’’

There were also two incorrect tables 

placed in Step 6a. The tables should 

have been ‘‘Table B.—District Two—

Projected Return on Investment’’ and 

Table C.—District Three—Projected 

Return on Investment.’’

Correction of Publication

■ Accordingly, the publication on 

December 12, 2003, of the interim rule 

[USCG–2002–11288], FR Doc. 03–30711, 

is corrected as follows:

■ 1. On page 69574, in Table A.—District 

One Step 10, change the figure under 

Total District One from $10,000 to 

$100,000.

■ 2. On page 69574, remove ‘‘Table B.—

District Two—Adjustment 

Determination’’ and ‘‘Table C.—District 

Three—Adjustment Determination’’ and, 

in their place, add the following tables.

TABLE B.—DISTRICT TWO—PROJECTED RETURN ON INVESTMENT

Step Area 4 Area 5 Total District 2

1 ............................................................................................................................................. $705,015 $1,461,069 $2,166,084

2 ............................................................................................................................................. (365,292) (446,468) (811,760) 

3 ............................................................................................................................................. (477,218) (930,701) (1,407,919) 

4 ............................................................................................................................................. (137,495) 83,900 (53,595) 

5 ............................................................................................................................................. 0 0 0

6 ............................................................................................................................................. (137,495) 83,900 (53,595) 

7 ............................................................................................................................................. 0 0 0

534 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 3 / Tuesday, January 6, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 

TABLE B.—DISTRICT TWO—PROJECTED RETURN ON INVESTMENT—Continued

Step Area 4 Area 5 Total District 2

8 ............................................................................................................................................. (137,495) 83,900 (53,595) 

9 ............................................................................................................................................. (137,495) 83,900 (53,595) 

10 ........................................................................................................................................... 89,734 140,353 230,087

11 ........................................................................................................................................... (1.593) 0.559 (0.280) 

TABLE C.—DISTRICT THREE—PROJECTED RETURN ON INVESTMENT

Step Area 6 Area 7 Area 8 Total District 1

1 ............................................................................................................... $1,540,306 $1,119,819 $1,030,693 $3,690,818

2 ............................................................................................................... (739,550) (292,739) (508,441) (1,540,730) 

3 ............................................................................................................... (1,099,676) (625,315) (715,827) (2,440,818) 

4 ............................................................................................................... (298,920) 201,765 (193,575) (290,730) 

5 ............................................................................................................... 0 0 0 0

6 ............................................................................................................... (298,920) 201,765 (193,575) (290,730) 

7 ............................................................................................................... 0 0 0 0

8 ............................................................................................................... (298,920) 201,765 (193,575) (290,730) 

9 ............................................................................................................... (298,920) 201,765 (193,575) (290,730) 

10 ............................................................................................................. 111,668 83,752 83,752 279,172

11 ............................................................................................................. (2.677) 2.409 (2.311) (1.041) 

Dated: December 30, 2003. 

Joseph J. Angelo, 

Acting Assistant Commandant for Marine 

Safety, Security and Environmental 

Protection.

[FR Doc. 04–226 Filed 1–5–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 02–239; RM–10529; RM–

10711] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; Alpine 

and Presidio, Texas

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: In response to a Notice of 

Proposed Rule Making, 67 FR 57779 

(September 12, 2001), this Report and 

Order grants the proposal to allot 

Channel 292C1 to Presidio, Texas, and 

denies the mutually exclusive proposal 

to allot Channel 293C at Alpine, Texas. 

Pursuant to the Commission’s FM 

allotment priorities, the proposal to 

provide a first local aural transmission 

service to Presidio [FM allotment 

priority (3)] prevails over a proposal to 

add a fourth local aural transmission 

service to Alpine [FM allotment priority 

(4)]. The coordinates for Channel 292C1 

at Presidio, Texas, are 29–25–54 North 

Latitude and 104–09–55 West 

Longitude, with a site restriction of 24.6 

kilometers (15.3 miles) southeast of 

Presidio, Texas.

DATES: Effective February 6, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. 

Barthen Gorman, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Report 

and Order, MB Docket No. 02–239, 

adopted December 18, 2003, and 

released December 23, 2003. The full 

text of this Commission decision is 

available for inspection and copying 

during normal business hours in the 

FCC’s Reference Information Center at 

Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 

CY–A257, Washington, DC, 20554. The 

document may also be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractor, Qualex International, Portals 

II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC, 20554, telephone (202) 

863–2893; facsimile (202) 863–2898, or 

via e-mail qualexint@aol.com.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting.

■ Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES

■ 1.The authority citation for part 73 

reads as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.

§ 73.202 [Amended]

■ 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM 

Allotments under Texas, is amended by 

adding Presidio, Channel 292C1.

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division Media 

Bureau.

[FR Doc. 04–106 Filed 1–5–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–U

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 03–4036; MB Docket No. 02–114; RM–

10426] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; 

Carrollton, Gurley, Meridianville, and 

Tuscumbia, AL

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: In response to a Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking, 67 FR 40907 

(June 14, 2002), this document grants a 

petition for rulemaking filed jointly by 

Capstar TX Limited Partnership, 

licensee of Station WXQW(FM), 

Meridianville, Alabama, and Clear 

Channel Broadcasting Licenses, Inc., 

licensee of Stations WLAY–FM, 

Tuscumbia, Alabama, and WZBQ, 

Carrollton, Alabama. Channel 231A is 

reallotted from Meridianville, Alabama 

to Gurley, Alabama and the license of 

Station WXQX(FM) is modified to 

reflect the change of community. 

Channel 262C2 is substituted for 

Channel 262C1 at Tuscumbia, Alabama, 

and Channel 262C2 is reallotted from 

Tuscumbia to Meridianville, Alabama, 

and the license of Station WLAY–FM is 

modified to reflect the change of