alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     CYCLOPSS CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     821,355
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         821,355
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  219,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    115,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,311,141
<PP&E>                                         335,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                 108,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,654,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          258,816
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          356
<PREFERRED>                                    19
<COMMON>                                       12,798,340
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,557,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,654,505
<SALES>                                        302,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               302,391
<CGS>                                          245,191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  750,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (448,054)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (58,206)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (492,048)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.04)
        


</TABLE>
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Watch the Short Films

Valley Forge National Historical Park
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Indigenous Knowledge and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
### §1449. State court record supplied

Where a party is entitled to copies of the records and proceedings in any suit or prosecution in a State court, to be used in any district court of the United States, and the clerk of such State court, upon demand, and the payment or tender of the legal fees, fails to deliver certified copies, the district court may, on affidavit reciting such facts, direct such record to be supplied by affidavit or otherwise. Thereupon such proceedings, trial, and judgment may be had in such district court, and all such process awarded, as if certified copies had been filed in the district court.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 940; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §85, 63 Stat. 102.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1948 Act

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §78 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §35, 36 Stat. 1098).

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### 1949 Act

This section corrects a typographical error by eliminating from section 1449 of title 28, U.S.C., the words "any attachment or sequestration of the", which had been inadvertently included, and inserting in lieu thereof the words, "and the clerk of such State court, upon".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1949—Act May 24, 1949, substituted "and the clerk of such State court, upon" for "any attachment or sequestration of the".
### [§114. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–357, title I, §101(a), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1423]

Section, added Pub. L. 106–519, §3(a), Nov. 15, 2000, 114 Stat. 2423, related to exclusion of extraterritorial income from gross income.

A prior section 114, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 35, related to sports programs conducted for American National Red Cross, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(a)(8), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–520.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to transactions after Dec. 31, 2004, see section 101(c) of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as an Effective Date of 2004 Amendments note under section 56 of this title.

#### Transition Provisions

Pub. L. 108–357, title I, §101(d)–(f), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1423, 1424, as amended by Pub. L. 109–222, title V, §513(b), May 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 366; Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §219(a), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4035, provided that:

"(d) Transitional Rule for 2005 and 2006.—

"(1) In general.—In the case of transactions during 2005 or 2006, the amount includible in gross income by reason of the amendments made by this section [amending sections 56, 275, 864, 903, and 999 of this title and repealing this section and sections 941 to 943 of this title] shall not exceed the applicable percentage of the amount which would have been so included but for this subsection.

"(2) Applicable percentage.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the applicable percentage shall be as follows:

"(A) For 2005, the applicable percentage shall be 20 percent.

"(B) For 2006, the applicable percentage shall be 40 percent.

"(3) Coordination with section 199.—This subsection shall be applied without regard to any deduction allowable under section 199 [probably means former section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986].

"(e) Revocation of Election To Be Treated as Domestic Corporation.—If, during the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 22, 2004], a corporation for which an election is in effect under section 943(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 revokes such election, no gain or loss shall be recognized with respect to property treated as transferred under clause (ii) of section 943(e)(4)(B) of such Code to the extent such property—

"(1) was treated as transferred under clause (i) thereof, or

"(2) was acquired during a taxable year to which such election applies and before May 1, 2003, in the ordinary course of its trade or business.

The Secretary of the Treasury (or such Secretary's delegate) may prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to prevent the abuse of the purposes of this subsection.

"[(f) Repealed. Pub. L. 109–222, title V, §513(b), May 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 366.]"
EXHIBIT 99.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 28, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES J.
BAUMBERGER
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |
### SUBCHAPTER I—FEDERAL ALCOHOL ADMINISTRATION
M INUTE O RDER Page1

M agistrate ludge lonathan Goodm an

KingBuildingCourtroom 11-3 Date:6/24/20 Time:1:30p.m.

Defendant: FELIPEM ONCALEANO BOTERO J#:Bond Case#: 20-20175-CR-MARTINEZ

AUSA:AlexanderKram er& La'NeseClarke Attorney: FERNANDO TAM AYO

violation:CONSPIRACYTOCOMMITMQNEYLAUNDERING Surr/ArrestDate: YOB:

Proceeding:Arraignment/W aiveroflndictment CJAAppt:

Bond/PTDHeld:C Yes f-No RecommendedBond:

BondSetat:$150KCSBNEBBIA Co-signedby:

Ur-lsurenderand/ordonotobtainpassports/traveldocs

j- ReporttoPTSasdirected/or x'saweek/monthby Disposition:

phone: x'saweek/monthinperson Dejendantoral waivesrihtto

Random urinetestingbyPretrial

r- services proceed byIndictm ent.W AIVER of

Treatm entasdeem ednecessary Indictm entto befiled bycloseof

C Refrainfrom excessiveuseofalcohol businesson6/26/20.

f- Participateinmentalhealthassessment&treatment

T Maintainorseekfull-timeemployment/education DefendantArraigned

Nr Nocontactwithvictims/witnesses,exceptthroughcounsel

NC Nofirearms

Nr Nottoencumberproperty

T' Maynotvisittransportationestablishments

HomeConfinement/ElectronicMonitoringand/or

Curfew pm to am,paidby

Alowances:M edicalneeds,courtappearances,attorneyvisits,

religious,employment

Nr Travelextendedto: yjmefromtodayto excluded g

NC Other: fromSpeedyTrialClock i

Language: English

NEXTCOURTAPPEARANCE Date: Time: Judge: Place:

ReportRECounsel'.

PTD/BondHearing'.

Prelim/ArraignorRemoval:

statusconferenceRE:

D.A.R. l%:JL*.OL Timeincourt: *1 * ihT

s/lonathanGoodman MagistrateJudge

Case 1:20-cr-20175-JEM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2020 Page 1 of 1
#### Arthur Lehmann, Appellant-Respondent, v. United States Lines Company, Respondent-Appellant.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
§ 103.5 How does SBA regulate an Agent's fees and provision of service? ( a ) Any Applicant, Agent, or Packager must execute and provide to SBA a compensation agreement, and any Lender Service Provider must execute and provide to SBA a Lender Service Provider agreement. Each agreement governs the compensation charged for services rendered or to be rendered to the Applicant or lender in any matter involving SBA assistance. SBA provides the form of compensation agreement and a suggested form of Lender Service Provider agreement to be used by Agents.
( b ) Compensation agreements must provide that in cases where SBA deems the compensation unreasonable, the Agent or Packager must: Reduce the charge to an amount SBA deems reasonable, refund any sum in excess of the amount SBA deems reasonable to the Applicant, and refrain from charging or collecting, directly or indirectly, from the Applicant an amount in excess of the amount SBA deems reasonable.
( c ) Each Lender Service Provider must enter into a written agreement with each lender for whom it acts in that capacity. SBA will review all such agreements. Such agreements need not contain each and every provision found in the SBA's suggested form of agreement. However, each agreement must indicate that both parties agree not to engage in any sharing of secondary market premiums, that the services to be provided are accurately described, and that the agreement is otherwise consistent with SBA requirements. Subject to the prohibition on splitting premiums, lenders have reasonable discretion in setting compensation for Lender Service Providers. However, such compensation may not be directly charged to an Applicant or Borrower.
[61 FR 2681, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 85 FR 7647, Feb. 10, 2020; 85 FR 80587, Dec. 14, 2020]
### [§6073. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §412(a)(2), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 792]

Section, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 750; Sept. 25, 1962, Pub. L. 87–682, §1(a)(2), (b), (c), 76 Stat. 575; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1012(c), title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), 90 Stat. 1614, 1834; Nov. 10, 1978, Pub. L. 95–628, §7(a), 92 Stat. 3630; Sept. 3, 1982, Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §328(b)(2), 96 Stat. 618, related to time for filing declarations of estimated income tax by individuals.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1984, see section 414(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as an Effective Date of 1984 Amendment note under section 6654 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Morris H. Siegel, Petitioner, against Harold J. Crawford, as a Justice of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Respondent, and Mae Harding, Intervener, Respondent.

Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARIO ANGUIANO-SILVA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-50305

D.C. No. 3:10-cr-04850-WQH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Mario Anguiano-Silva appeals from the 14-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

FILED

MAY 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-50305

Anguiano-Silva contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing

to address his argument that a lower sentence was justified in light of the length of

the sentence imposed for his new 8 U.S.C. § 1326 violation. We review for plain

error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir.

2010), and find none. The district court explained that a lower sentence would not

adequately reflect the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors or appropriately

sanction Anguiano-Silva for his breach of the court’s trust. 

Anguiano-Silva also contends that his sentence is substantively

unreasonable. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing AnguianoSilva’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). In light of the

totality of the circumstances and the section 3583(e) sentencing factors, the belowGuidelines sentence is substantively reasonable. See id.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from 
     KOWTOW, INC. September 30, 1996 financial  statements and  is qualified
     in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894501
<NAME>                        KOWTOW, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Virgin Islands Coral Reef
National MonumentVirgin Islands
### §82. Reimbursement of moving expenses

Except as provided in section 132(a)(6), there shall be included in gross income (as compensation for services) any amount received or accrued, directly or indirectly, by an individual as a payment for or reimbursement of expenses of moving from one residence to another residence which is attributable to employment or self-employment.

(Added Pub. L. 91–172, title II, §231(b), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 579; amended Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13213(d)(3)(A), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 474; Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title IV, §401(a)(34), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1186.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–141 substituted "of moving expenses" for "for expenses of moving" in section catchline.

1993—Pub. L. 103–66 substituted "Except as provided in section 132(a)(6), there shall" for "There shall".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–66 applicable to reimbursements or other payments in respect of expenses incurred after Dec. 31, 1993, see section 13213(e) of Pub. L. 103–66, set out as a note under section 62 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1969, except that it does not apply to moving expenses paid or incurred before July 1, 1970, in connection with the commencement of work by the taxpayer as an employee at a new principal place of work of which the taxpayer had been notified by his employer on or before December 19, 1969, see section 231(d) of Pub. L. 91–172, set out as an Effective Date of 1969 Amendment note under section 217 of this title.

#### Moving Expenses of Members of the Uniformed Services

Withholding, reporting, inclusion within adjusted gross income, and deduction for reimbursement for moving expenses of members of the uniformed services, see section 2 of Pub. L. 93–490, Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1466, set out as a note under section 217 of this title.
REINER & REINER, P.A.

ONE DATRAN CENTER  9100 SOUTH DADELAND BLVD  SUITE 901  MIAMI  FLORIDA  33156  TEL: 305 670-8282  FAX: 305 670-8989

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

(Fort Lauderdale Division) 

CASE NO.: 20-CR-80049-WPD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v.

LEONARD SHEMTOB, 

STRONG SUPPLEMENTS LLC

 

Defendants.

 /

NOTICE OF FILING

WAIVER OF CONFLICT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, Defendant Leonard Shemtob is filing for the record, a letter 

independently memorializing a waiver of representational conflict with Strong Supplements LLC, 

in the above-styled cause for all purposes.

Respectfully submitted,

REINER & REINER, P.A.

Local Counsel for Defendants

9100 So. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 901

Miami, Florida 33156-7815

Tel: (305) 670-8282; Fax: (305) 670-8989

 dpr@reinerslaw.com; eservice@reinerslaw.com

 /S/ DAVID P. REINER, II

By:_______________________________________

 DAVID P. REINER, II; Fla. Bar No. 416400

Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/20/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

REINER & REINER, P.A.

ONE DATRAN CENTER  9100 SOUTH DADELAND BLVD  SUITE 901  MIAMI  FLORIDA  33156  TEL: 305 670-8282  FAX: 305 670-8989

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 20, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being 

served this day on all counsel either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated 

by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not 

authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

REINER & REINER, P.A.

Local Counsel for Defendants

9100 So. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 901

Miami, Florida 33156-7815

Tel: (305) 670-8282; Fax: (305) 670-8989

 dpr@reinerslaw.com; eservice@reinerslaw.com

 

 /S/ DAVID P. REINER, II

By:_______________________________________

 DAVID P. REINER, II; Fla. Bar No. 416400

W:\700\73125 - Nomatterwhat Tech\73125 - Notice of Appearance.docx

Case 9:20-cr-80049-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/20/2020 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:20-cv-22375-DPG

WINDY LUCIUS, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 

FOOT LOCKER, INC. d/b/a FOOTACTION,

Defendant.

/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), with no responsive pleadings having yet been 

filed by Defendant, Plaintiff Windy Lucius hereby gives notice that she voluntarily dismisses all 

claims against Defendant with prejudice, and requests this Court to terminate the action.

Dated: September 11, 2020

Respectfully submitted,

s/ J. Courtney Cunningham

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

FBN: 628166

 8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

Telephone: (305) 351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff Windy Lucius

Case 1:20-cv-22375-DPG Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2020 Page 1 of 1
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hiking the Rocky Springs Section of the Natchez Trace National Scenic Trail

Natchez Trace Parkway, Natchez Trace National Scenic Trail
§ 4.1382 Contents of request for review; response to request; amendment of request. ( a ) The request for review shall include: ( 1 ) A copy of the decision of OSM;
( 2 ) A statement of the alleged errors in the decision and the facts that entitle the person requesting review to administrative relief;
( 3 ) A statement whether the person requesting review wishes an evidentiary hearing or waives the opportunity for such a hearing;
( 4 ) A request for specific relief; and
( 5 ) Any other relevant information.
( b ) Within 20 days of service of the request for review in accordance with 43 CFR 4.1109, OSM and all interested parties shall file an answer to the request for review or a motion in response to the request or a statement that no answer or motion will be filed. OSM or any interested party may request an evidentiary hearing even if the person requesting review has waived the opportunity for a hearing.
( c ) The person filing the request for review may amend it once as a matter of right before the response in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section is required to be filed. After the period for filing such a response, the person may file a motion for leave to amend the request with the administrative law judge. If the administrative law judge grants a motion for leave to amend, he shall provide OSM and any other party that filed a response in accordance with paragraph (b) not less than 10 days to file an amended response.