alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTINE MARIE SHENOI,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

RAVEEN SHENOI,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 2D21-1537

September 2, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Cynthia J. 

Newton, Judge.

Ingrid Anderson, Clearwater, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Jane H. Grossman, St. Petersburg, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal brought by the former wife and cross-appeal 

brought by the former husband challenging the final judgment of 

dissolution and the amendment thereto entered following a partial 
2

grant of a motion for rehearing. We affirm the final judgment of 

dissolution without further comment with one exception. 

There is not a sufficient basis for this court to determine 

whether the retroactive child support awarded included appropriate 

consideration by the trial court of any amounts already paid for the 

benefit of the child. See § 61.30(17)(b), Fla. Stat. (2020); Carter v. 

Carter, 294 So. 3d 384, 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (finding error 

where mortgage payments that were already paid for the benefit of 

the child were not calculated into the retroactive child support 

obligation and stating that "[s]ection 61.30(17)(b), Florida Statutes[,] 

requires the court to consider all actual payments made to the 

other parent for the benefit of the child"). That portion of the final 

judgment reflecting an award of retroactive child support 

accordingly is reversed. We remand the matter to the trial court to 

indicate whether any amounts already paid by the former husband 

for the benefit of the child during the retroactive child support 

period were counted and to adjust that award if necessary.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. 

MORRIS, C.J., and VILLANTI and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
3

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Tuzigoot
National Monument
Arizona


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Maps
 Verde Valley Map

Verde Valley Area Map
 Last updated: December 23, 2022
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: P.O. Box 219
Camp Verde,
AZ
86322
 Phone: 928-634-5564 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### § 107.130 Requirement for qualified management.

When applying for a license, and while you have a license, you must show, to the satisfaction of SBA, that your current or proposed management team is qualified and has the knowledge, experience and capability necessary for investing in the types of businesses contemplated by the Act, the regulations in this part 107, and your business plan. You must designate at least one individual as the official responsible for contact with SBA.

[61 FR 3189, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 77 FR 25051, Apr. 27, 2012]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22383-CIV-WILLIAMS

MTACC LTD. d/b/a EPAYSERVICE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CHF CORPORATION et al.

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’ report 

and recommendation (the “Report”) (DE 26) on Plaintiff’s motion for final default judgment 

against Defendants, CHF Corporation, Carlos Flores, David J. Bartone, and Law Offices 

of David J. Bartone. (DE 21.) The Report recommends that Plaintiff’s motion be granted 

as to Plaintiff’s breach of contract and conversion claims, but denied as to Plaintiff’s unjust 

enrichment claim and demand for a permanent injunction. In addition, the Report 

recommends that Plaintiff’s demand for fees and costs be denied without prejudice. No 

objections to the Report were filed and the time to do so has now passed. Accordingly, 

upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The conclusions in the Report (DE 26) are AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. The motion (DE 21) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is 

GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s breach of contract and conversion claims. It is

DENIED as to the unjust enrichment claim and Plaintiff’s demand for a 

permanent injunction.

Case 1:20-cv-22383-KMW Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/16/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

3. The motion (DE 21) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Plaintiff’s request

for fees and costs. Plaintiff may file a renewed motion for fees and costs within 

thirty (30) days of this Order. 

4. Judgment is entered against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiff in the amount 

of $1,167,258.09. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 15th day of

September, 2020.

Case 1:20-cv-22383-KMW Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/16/2020 Page 2 of 2
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


The White House and President's Park
District of Columbia


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  News
 **News media inquiries:**
Press Kit - Guidance on news gathering in the White House Visitor Center
Contact public affairs

News Releases
Sort By:RelevanceRecently UpdatedDate ReleasedTitle
Show1040 per page
Loading results...
 Last updated: October 18, 2023
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 1849 C Street NW
Room 1426
Washington,
DC
20240
 Phone: 202 208-1631 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 152

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
### §681. Limitation on charitable deduction

#### (a) Trade or business income

In computing the deduction allowable under section 642(c) to a trust, no amount otherwise allowable under section 642(c) as a deduction shall be allowed as a deduction with respect to income of the taxable year which is allocable to its unrelated business income for such year. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term "unrelated business income" means an amount equal to the amount which, if such trust were exempt from tax under section 501(a) by reason of section 501(c)(3), would be computed as its unrelated business taxable income under section 512 (relating to income derived from certain business activities and from certain property acquired with borrowed funds).

#### (b) Cross reference

**For disallowance of certain charitable, etc., deductions otherwise allowable under section 642(c), see sections 508(d) and 4948(c)(4).**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 232; Pub. L. 90–630, §6(b), Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1330; Pub. L. 91–172, title I, §§101(j)(18), (19), 121(d)(2)(B), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 528, 547.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1969—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–172, §121(d)(2)(B), substituted reference to certain property acquired with borrowed funds for reference to certain leases.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 91–172, §101(j)(18), (19), redesignated subsec. (d) as (b) and substituted "sections 518(d) and 4948(c)(4)" for "section 503(e)". Former subsec. (b), dealing generally with the operation of trusts, was struck out.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 91–172, §101(j)(18), struck out subsec. (c) dealing with accumulated income.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 91–172, §101(j)(19), redesignated subsec. (d) as (b).

1968—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 90–630 inserted provision that par. (1) does not apply to income attributable to property transferred to a trust before January 1, 1951, by the creator thereof if the trust was irrevocable on such date and if the income is required to be accumulated pursuant to the mandatory terms of the instrument creating the trust.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1969 Amendment

Amendment by section 101(j)(18), (19) of Pub. L. 91–172 effective Jan. 1, 1970, see section 101(k)(1) of Pub. L. 91–172, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4940 of this title.

Amendment by section 121(d)(2)(B) of Pub. L. 91–172 applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1969, see section 121(g) of Pub. L. 91–172, set out as a note under section 511 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Pub. L. 90–630, §6(c), Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1330, provided that: "The amendments made by subsection (a) [amending section 504 of this title] and (b) [amending this section] shall apply with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1953, and ending after August 16, 1954. For purposes of sections 3814 and 162(g)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, provisions having the same effect as such amendments shall be treated as included in such sections effective with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1950."
#### § 107.1440 Three percent preferred stock issued before November 21, 1989.

Before November 21, 1989, Preferred Securities were available only in the form of preferred stock and had a preferred and cumulative dividend of 3 percent. If you have such preferred stock outstanding, you must follow § 107.1400 (except for § 107.1400(d)), substituting “3 percent” for “4 percent” throughout.) Dividends on 3 percent preferred stock are payable at the discretion of your Board of Directors or General Partner(s), except that all dividends in arrears must be paid in full before any non-SBA investor receives any distribution. Upon your liquidation, SBA is entitled to payment of all dividends in arrears even if you have no Retained Earnings Available for Distribution at such time.
### §6326. Administrative appeal of liens

#### (a) In general

In such form and at such time as the Secretary shall prescribe by regulations, any person shall be allowed to appeal to the Secretary after the filing of a notice of a lien under this subchapter on the property or the rights to property of such person for a release of such lien alleging an error in the filing of the notice of such lien.

#### (b) Certificate of release

If the Secretary determines that the filing of the notice of any lien was erroneous, the Secretary shall expeditiously (and, to the extent practicable, within 14 days after such determination) issue a certificate of release of such lien and shall include in such certificate a statement that such filing was erroneous.

(Added Pub. L. 100–647, title VI, §6238(a), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3743.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6326 was renumbered 6327 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 100–647, title VI, §6238(d), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3743, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall take effect on the date which is 60 days after the date regulations are issued under subsection (b) [set out below]."

#### Regulations

Pub. L. 100–647, title VI, §6238(b), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3743, required Secretary of the Treasury or Secretary's delegate to prescribe regulations necessary to implement administrative appeal provided for in amendment made by subsection (a) [enacting this section] within 180 days after Nov. 10, 1988.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-60990-CIV-SINGHAL/VALLE

DOMINGO OBANDO,

Plaintiff,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Valle’s Report and 

Recommendation on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Petition for Attorney’s Fees (DE [25]), which 

recommends that Plaintiff’s Unopposed Petition for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal 

Access to Justice Act (DE [24]) be granted. Neither party has filed any objections to 

Judge Valle’s Report and Recommendation. Thus, this Court reviews the Report and 

Recommendation only for clear error. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784

(11th Cir. 2006) (quoting Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th 

Cir. 2005)). 

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Petition and Judge Valle’s well-reasoned Report 

and Recommendation and finds no clear error. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. Magistrate Judge Valle’s Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff’s Unopposed 

Petition for Attorney’s Fees (DE [25]) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety.

Case 0:20-cv-60990-AHS Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/16/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

2. Plaintiff’s Unopposed Petition for Attorney’s Fees (DE [25]) is GRANTED. Plaintiff 

is awarded a total of $5,107.54 in attorney’s fees plus $400 in costs to be paid 

to Plaintiff’s counsel once the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that 

Plaintiff owes no debt to the United States.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 16th day of 

September 2021.

Copies furnished counsel via CM/ECF

Case 0:20-cv-60990-AHS Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/16/2021 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22865]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1549-DR]

Alabama; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1549-DR), dated September 15, 2004, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 15, 2004:

    Chambers, DeKalb, Henry, Houston, Jackson, Lauderdale, 
Limestone, Morgan, and Russell Counties for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-22865 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129716 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129716 COA: 261014 Oakland CC: 1999-169670-FC PETER RODRIGUEZ APONTE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 21, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
### §5127. Procedure

In any election heretofore or hereafter held under the Act of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 984) [25 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.], on the question of excluding a reservation from the application of the said Act or on the question of adopting a constitution and bylaws or amendments thereto or on the question of ratifying a charter, the vote of a majority of those actually voting shall be necessary and sufficient to effectuate such exclusion, adoption, or ratification, as the case may be: Provided, however, That in each instance the total vote cast shall not be less than 30 per centum of those entitled to vote.

(June 15, 1935, ch. 260, §1, 49 Stat. 378.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 18, 1934, referred to in text, is act June 18, 1934, ch. 576, 48 Stat. 984, popularly known as the Indian Reorganization Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 478a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED **

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | 3) | such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4) | the                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended June 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Insightful Corporation. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August                11, 2005 | By:  | /s/                Richard P. Barber                                                               |
|-------------|--------------------------------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |                           |      | Richard                P. Barber                                                                   |
|        |                           |      | Chief                Financial Officer (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22806]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1420-BJ-TRST; ES-052442, Group No. 156, Minnesota]

Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plat of survey; Minnesota.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calender days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota

T. 142 N., R. 39 W.

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion 
of the north, south and east boundaries and a portion of the 
subdivisional lines; the survey of the subdivision of sections 5, 6, 
19, 20, 24, 30, and 36; and the corrective dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the east boundary; and the corrective survey of the 
subdivision of section 1, of Township 142 North, Range 39 West, Fifth 
Principal Meridian, in the State of Minnesota, and was accepted 
September 23, 2004. We will place a copy of the plat we described in 
the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of 
information.
    If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the 
plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

    Dated: September 23, 2004.
Stephen D. Douglas,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 04-22806 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
```