This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices to the public of the proposed

issuance of rules and regulations. The

purpose of these notices is to give interested

persons an opportunity to participate in the

rule making prior to the adoption of the final

rules.

Proposed Rules Federal Register

68728 

Vol. 75, No. 216 

Tuesday, November 9, 2010 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

7 CFR Part 1245 

[Document Number AMS–FV–07–0091; FV– 

07–706–PR–2A] 

RIN 0581–AC78 

Establishment of a U.S. Honey 

Producer Research, Promotion, and 

Consumer Information Order; 

Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule 

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, 

USDA. 

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule 

and referendum order. 

SUMMARY: This document withdraws a 

proposed rule published in the Federal 

Register on April 12, 2010, that 

proposed a new U.S. honey producer 

funded research and promotion program 

under the Commodity Promotion, 

Research, and Information Act of 1996 

(1996 Act). The proposed U.S. Honey 

Producer Research, Promotion and 

Consumer Information Order (Proposed 

Order) was submitted to the Department 

of Agriculture (Department) by the 

American Honey Producers Association 

(AHPA). The Department conducted an 

initial referendum from May 17, 2010, 

through June 4, 2010, to ascertain 

whether the persons to be covered by 

and assessed under the Proposed Order 

favored the Order prior to it going into 

effect. The Proposed Order failed by 

vote. Accordingly, based upon the 

referendum results, the proposed rule is 

being withdrawn. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 9, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kimberly Coy, Marketing Specialist, 

Research and Promotion Branch, Fruit 

and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 

Stop 0244, Room 0634–S, 1400 

Independence Ave., SW., Washington, 

DC 20250–0244; telephone (202) 720– 

9915 or (888) 720–9917 (toll free), Fax: 

(202) 205–2800 or e-mail 

kimberly.coy@ams.usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule 

is issued under the Commodity 

Promotion, Research, and Information 

Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411– 

7425). 

This action withdraws a proposed 

rule and referendum order published in 

the Federal Register on April 12, 2010 

[75 FR 18430], that proposed a new U.S. 

honey producer funded research and 

promotion program. 

As part of this rulemaking, a proposed 

rule was published in the Federal 

Register on July 14, 2009 [74 FR 34182], 

with a 60-day comment period which 

closed on September 4, 2009. Fourteen 

comments were received. In addition, a 

second proposed rule and referendum 

order was published in the Federal 

Register on April 12, 2010 [75 FR 

18430]. A separate final rule on 

referendum procedures was published 

in the Federal Register on April 12, 

2010 [75 FR 18396]. 

The Department conducted an initial 

referendum from May 17, 2010 through 

June 4, 2010 to ascertain whether the 

persons to be covered by and assessed 

under the Proposed Order favored the 

Order prior to it going into effect. To be 

eligible to vote, producers must have 

produced 100,000 or more pounds of 

honey from January 1, 2008 through 

December 31, 2008. The Proposed Order 

would have been implemented if 

approved by a majority of the producers 

voting in the referendum, which also 

represented a majority of the volume of 

U.S. honey produced during the 

representative period by those voting in 

the referendum. In the referendum, 41 

percent of those who voted— 

representing 52 percent of the voted 

volume of U.S. honey—favored 

implementation of the Order. Therefore, 

the Proposed Order failed by vote. 

Accordingly based upon the referendum 

results, the proposed rule is being 

withdrawn. 

The proposed rule to implement a 

new U.S. honey producer funded 

research and promotion program under 

the 1996 Act published in the Federal 

Register on April 12, 2010 (75 FR 

18430), is hereby withdrawn. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1245 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Advertising, Consumer 

Education, U.S. Honey, Marketing 

agreements, Promotion, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425; 7 U.S.C. 

7401. 

Dated: November 3, 2010. 

David R. Shipman, 

Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28242 Filed 11–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–1108; Directorate 

Identifier 2010–NM–151–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, 

Inc. Model CL–215–1A10 (CL–215), CL– 

215–6B11 (CL–215T Variant), and CL– 

215–6B11 (CL–415 Variant) Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above. This proposed 

AD results from mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of 

another country to identify and correct 

an unsafe condition on an aviation 

product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 

condition as: 

Seven cases of on-ground hydraulic 

accumulator screw cap or end cap failure 

have been experienced * * * resulting in 

loss of the associated hydraulic system and 

high-energy impact damage to adjacent 

systems and structure. * * * 

* * * * * 

A detailed analysis of the systems and 

structure in the potential line of trajectory of 

a failed screw cap/end cap for each 

accumulator has been conducted. It has 

identified that the worst-case scenarios 

would be impact damage to various 

components, potentially resulting in fuel 

spillage, uncommanded flap movement, or 

loss of aileron control [and consequent 

reduced controllability of the airplane]. 

* * * * * 

The proposed AD would require actions 

that are intended to address the unsafe 

condition described in the MCAI. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules 68729 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by December 27, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Bombardier, 

Inc., 400 Coˆte-Vertu Road West, Dorval, 

Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 

514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; 

e-mail thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; 

Internet http://www.bombardier.com. 

You may review copies of the 

referenced service information at the 

FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Alfano, Aerospace 

Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical 

Systems Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New 

York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 

Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, 

New York 11590; telephone (516) 228– 

7340; fax (516) 794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2010–1108; Directorate Identifier 

2010–NM–151–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

Transport Canada Civil Aviation 

(TCCA), which is the aviation authority 

for Canada, has issued Canadian 

Airworthiness Directive CF–2009–42R1, 

dated May 14, 2010 (referred to after 

this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe 

condition for the specified products. 

The MCAI states: 

* * * * * 

Seven cases of on-ground hydraulic 

accumulator screw cap or end cap failure 

have been experienced on CL–600–2B19 

(CRJ) aircraft, resulting in loss of the 

associated hydraulic system and high-energy 

impact damage to adjacent systems and 

structure. To date, the lowest number of 

flight cycles accumulated at the time of 

failure has been 6991. 

Although there have been no failures to 

date on any CL–215–1A10 (CL–215) or CL– 

215–6B11 (CL–215T and CL–415) aircraft, 

similar accumulators, Part Number (P/N) 08– 

8423–010 (MS28700–3), to those installed on 

the CL–600–2B19, are installed on the 

aircraft listed in the Applicability section of 

this directive [MCAI]. 

A detailed analysis of the systems and 

structure in the potential line of trajectory of 

a failed screw cap/end cap for each 

accumulator has been conducted. It has 

identified that the worst-case scenarios 

would be impact damage to various 

components, potentially resulting in fuel 

spillage, uncommanded flap movement, or 

loss of aileron control [and consequent 

reduced controllability of the airplane]. 

This directive [MCAI] mandates repetitive 

[ultrasonic] inspections of the accumulators 

for cracks and replacement of any 

accumulator in which a crack is detected. 

* * * * * 

You may obtain further information by 

examining the MCAI in the AD docket. 

Relevant Service Information 

Bombardier has issued Service 

Bulletins 215–541, 215–3155, and 215– 

4414, all Revision 1, all dated March 12, 

2010. The actions described in this 

service information are intended to 

correct the unsafe condition identified 

in the MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Differences Between This AD and the 

MCAI or Service Information 

We have reviewed the MCAI and 

related service information and, in 

general, agree with their substance. But 

we might have found it necessary to use 

different words from those in the MCAI 

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 

operators and is enforceable. In making 

these changes, we do not intend to differ 

substantively from the information 

provided in the MCAI and related 

service information. 

We might also have proposed 

different actions in this AD from those 

in the MCAI in order to follow FAA 

policies. Any such differences are 

highlighted in a NOTE within the 

proposed AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

Based on the service information, we 

estimate that this proposed AD would 

affect about 6 products of U.S. registry. 

We also estimate that it would take 

about 7 work-hours per product to 

comply with the basic requirements of 

this proposed AD. The average labor 

rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on 

these figures, we estimate the cost of the 

proposed AD on U.S. operators to be 

$3,570, or $595 per product per 

inspection cycle. 

In addition, we estimate that any 

necessary follow-on actions would take 

about 6 work-hours and require parts 

costing $4,055, for a cost of $4,565 per 

product. We have no way of 

determining the number of products 

that may need these actions. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
68730 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2010– 

1108; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM– 

151–AD. 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments by 

December 27, 2010. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. 

airplanes, certificated in any category, 

identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and 

(c)(3) of this AD. 

(1) Model CL–215–1A10 (CL–215) 

airplanes, serial numbers 1001 through 1990 

inclusive; 

(2) Model CL–215–6B11 (CL–215T Variant) 

airplanes, serial numbers 1056 through 1125 

inclusive; 

(3) Model CL–215–6B11 (CL–415 Variant) 

airplanes, serial numbers 2001 through 2990 

inclusive. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 27: Flight controls; and 32: 

Landing gear. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

Seven cases of on-ground hydraulic 

accumulator screw cap or end cap failure 

have been experienced * * * resulting in 

loss of the associated hydraulic system and 

high-energy impact damage to adjacent 

systems and structure. * * * 

* * * * * 

A detailed analysis of the systems and 

structure in the potential line of trajectory of 

a failed screw cap/end cap for each 

accumulator has been conducted. It has 

identified that the worst-case scenarios 

would be impact damage to various 

components, potentially resulting in fuel 

spillage, uncommanded flap movement, or 

loss of aileron control [and consequent 

reduced controllability of the airplane]. 

* * * * * 

Compliance 

(f) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Inspection To Determine Flight Hours 

(g) Within 50 flight hours after the effective 

date of this AD, inspect to determine the 

number of flight cycles accumulated by each 

of the applicable accumulators (i.e., brake, 

aileron, elevator, and rudder accumulators) 

having part number (P/N) 08–8423–010 

(MS28700–3) installed on the airplane. A 

review of airplane maintenance records is 

acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the 

number of flight cycles accumulated can be 

conclusively determined from that review. 

Initial Ultrasonic Inspection 

(h) For Model CL–215–1A10 (CL–215) and 

CL–215–6B11 (CL–215T) airplanes: Do an 

ultrasonic inspection for cracking of the 

accumulator at the applicable time specified 

in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, in 

accordance with Part B of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of the 

applicable service bulletin listed in Table 1 

of this AD. 

TABLE 1—SERVICE BULLETINS

For model— Use Bombardier 

Service Bulletin— Revision— Dated— 

CL–215–1A10 (CL–215) ......................................................................................... 215–541 1 March 12, 2010. 

CL–215–6B11 (CL–215T) ....................................................................................... 215–3155 1 March 12, 2010. 

CL–600–6B11 (CL–415) ......................................................................................... 215–4414 1 March 12, 2010. 

(1) For any accumulator on which the 

inspection required by paragraph (g) of this 

AD shows an accumulation of more than 875 

total flight cycles or on which it is not 

possible to determine the number of total 

accumulated flight cycles, do the inspection 

within 125 flight cycles after the effective 

date of this AD. 

(2) For any accumulator on which the 

inspection required by paragraph (g) of this 

AD shows an accumulation of 875 total flight 

cycles or fewer, do the inspection before the 

accumulation of 1,000 flight cycles on the 

accumulator. 

(i) For Model CL–215–6B11 (CL–415) 

airplanes, do an ultrasonic inspection for 

cracking of the accumulator at the applicable 

time specified in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of 

this AD, in accordance with Part B of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of the 

applicable service bulletin listed in Table 1 

of this AD. 

(1) For any accumulator on which the 

inspection required by paragraph (g) of this 

AD shows an accumulation of more than 750 

flight cycles or on which it is not possible to 

determine the number of total accumulated 

flight cycles, do the inspection within 250 

flight cycles after the effective date of this 

AD. 

(2) For any accumulator on which the 

inspection required by paragraph (g) of this 

AD shows an accumulation of 750 total flight 

cycles or fewer, do the inspection before the 

accumulation of 1,000 flight cycles on the 

accumulator. 

Repetitive Inspections 

(j) If no cracking is found during any 

inspection required by paragraph (h) or (i) of 

this AD, repeat the inspection thereafter at 

intervals not to exceed 750 flight cycles. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules 68731 

(k) If any cracking is found during any 

inspection required by paragraph (h) or (i) of 

this AD, before further flight, replace the 

accumulator with a serviceable accumulator, 

in accordance with Part B of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of the 

applicable service bulletin listed in Table 1 

of this AD. Doing the replacement does not 

end the inspection requirements of this AD. 

Repeat the inspections required by paragraph 

(h) or (i) of this AD at intervals not to exceed 

750 flight cycles. 

Parts Installation 

(l) As of the effective date of this AD, no 

person may install an accumulator (P/N) 08– 

8423–010 (MS28700–3) on any airplane 

unless the accumulator has been inspected in 

accordance with the requirements of this AD. 

Credit for Actions Accomplished in 

Accordance With Previous Service 

Information 

(m) Inspections accomplished before the 

effective date of this AD in accordance with 

the applicable service bulletin listed in Table 

2 of this AD are considered acceptable for 

compliance with the corresponding action 

specified in this AD. 

TABLE 2—CREDIT SERVICE BULLETINS

For model— Use Bombardier 

Service Bulletin— Dated— 

CL–215–1A10 (CL–215) ..................................................................................................................... 215–541 July 9, 2009. 

CL–215–6B11 (CL–215T) ................................................................................................................... 215–3155 July 9, 2009. 

CL–600–6B11 (CL–415) ..................................................................................................................... 215–4414 July 9, 2009. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: 

No differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(n) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: 

Program Manager, Continuing Operational 

Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 

11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516– 

794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC 

on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your principal maintenance inspector 

(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), 

as appropriate, or lacking a principal 

inspector, your local Flight Standards District 

Office. The AMOC approval letter must 

specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(o) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada Civil 

Aviation Airworthiness Directive CF–2009– 

42R1, dated May 14, 2010; and the service 

bulletins listed in Table 1 of this AD; for 

related information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

November 2, 2010. 

Dionne Palermo, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28275 Filed 11–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–1107; Directorate 

Identifier 2009–NM–263–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Cessna 

Aircraft Company Model 750 Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Model 750 airplanes. This proposed AD 

would require an inspection to 

determine the serial numbers of the 

auxiliary power unit (APU) generator 

and the left and right engine direct 

current (DC) generators, and related 

corrective actions if necessary. This 

proposed AD would also require 

revising the airplane flight manual. This 

proposed AD results from a report of a 

DC generator overvoltage event which 

caused smoke in the cockpit and 

damage to numerous avionics and 

electrical components. We are 

proposing this AD to detect and correct 

an overvoltage condition on the DC 

electrical busses caused by exciter stator 

winding failures, and subsequent failure 

of the generator control unit (GCU) 

overvoltage protection circuitry, which 

could result in damage to critical 

electrical and avionics components. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by December 27, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Cessna 

Aircraft Co., P.O. Box 7706, Wichita, 

Kansas 67277; telephone 316–517–6215; 

fax 316–517–5802; e-mail 

citationpubs@cessna.textron.com; 

Internet https:// 

www.cessnasupport.com/newlogin.html. 

You may review copies of the 

referenced service information at the 

FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1