### No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 1990 / Rules and Regulations 45799 §334.360 Chesapeake Bay offFort Monroe, Virginia;restricted area, U.S. Naval Base and Naval Surface Weapon Center.

(a) The area. Beginning at latitude 37°00'30"N, longitude 76°18'05"W; thence to latitude 37'00'38"N,longitude 76'17'42"W; thence to latitude 37°00'39"N; longitude 76ol6'11";thence to latitude 36°59'18"N, longitude 76°17'52"W; thence to latitude 37°00'05"N, longitude 760

### 18'17"W;and thence north along the seawall to the point ofbeginning.

Dated: October 4.1990. PatrickJ.Kelly, MajorGeneral,USA,Director of

Civil Works. [FR 

### Doc. 90-25676 Filed 10-30-90; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3710-92-M 

### ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 51 [AD-FRL-3855-7] Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of State Implementation Plans; Corrections to PM-10 Areas of Concern AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Technical corrections to the areas ofconcern for certain Group I and IIareas. SUMMARY: The EPA published national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) and implementation policiesfor particulate matter (PM] with an aerodynamic diameter ofa nominal 10 microns or less (PM-Ia) on July 1, 1987 

### (52 FR 24634 and 52 FR 24672). Anotice identifying areas with very high probabilities (Group I)and moderate probabilities (Group II) ofviolating the PM-10 standards was published on August 7, 1987 (52 FR 29383). A notice that the grouping ofthree ofthese areas had been modified was published on March 28, 1989 (54 

### FR 12620). Work to develop State implementation plans (SIP's) to attain the PM-10 NAAQS began immediately for the Group I areas. Ambient PM-10 concentrations have been monitored in the Group II areas since 1987.

The EPA is, by thisnotice, clarifying the descriptions ofcertain Group land Group II areas ofconcern listed in the August 7, 1987 notice. This action is being taken because the areas were only generally described in 1987 as cities, counties, orplanning areas. The States were given guidance in the PM-IO SIP Development Guideline (EPA-450/2-86-- 002, June 1987) on how to further define the extent ofareas violating the PM-10 standards in the process ofdeveloping PM-10 SIP's.Therefore, some States have provided EPA with more detailed descriptions ofcertain Group I and Group IIareas ofconcern. DATES: 

### These corrections are effective October 31, 1990. ADDRESSES: 

### Information supporting the Group'I and Group II area descriptions can be obtained from the respective EPA Regional Office which services that particular State. The addresses ofthe Regional Offices are:

* State Air Programs Branch, EPA Region I,J.F.K. Federal Building, Boston, MA 02203-2211.

e 

### Air Programs Branch, EPA Region II, 26 Federal Plaza, New York,NY 10278.

e 

### Air Programs Branch, EPA Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

9Air Programs Branch, EPA Region IV, 345 Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta, GA 30365.

* Air and Radiation Branch, EPA Region V,230 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60604.

a Air Programs Branch, EPA Region VI, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202- 2733.

* Air Branch, EPA RegionVII, 726 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66101.

*

### Air Programs Branch, EPA Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Denver Placesuite 500,Denver, CO 80202-2405.

* Air Programs Branch, EPA Region IX, 1235 Mission Street, San Francisco; CA 94103.

eAirPrograms Branch, EPA Region X, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

### Kenneth R. Woodard, Particulate Matter Programs Section, Air Quality Management Division (MD-15), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

### 1. Background

On July 1, 1987, theEPA promulgated revised NAAQS for PM (52FR 24634). The standards incorporate a new indicator ofPM that includes onlythose particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than orequal to a nominal 10 microns.

Simultaneously, EPA published revised requirements for SIP'sto attain and maintain the standards (52FR 24672). In orderto focus Federal and State resources on implementing the PM-la NAAQS first in those areas of the country believed to be violating the standards, EPA classified all areas of the Nation into one of three groups. GroupI areas were those having a very high probability ofviolating the PM-10 standards based on ambient air quality data available for 1984 through 1987 for PM-10 and total suspended PM. Group 1I areas had a moderate probability of violating the standards, and Group III areas were those believed to be currently attaining the standards.

A listof Group I and II areas in each State was published in theFederal Register on August 7, 1987 (52 FR 29383). The remaining portion of any State not listed as Group IorII in the August 7 notice was classified in Group III.

A subsequent notice, published on March 28, 1989 (54 FR 12620), announced that three revisions had been made to the list ofGroup Iand II areas. Sandpoint, Idaho, was changed from Group I to Group II, effective August 31, 1987 following a determination that the area lacked sufficient ambient data to justify a Group Iclassification. Porter County, Indiana, was changed from Group I to Group II,effective November 29,1988 as a result ofa settlement agreement negotiated with Bethlehem Steel Corporation (seeBethlehemSteel Corporationv. Thomas), 87-2476 

### (7th Cir.). Mono Basin, California, was changed from Group III to Group II, effective June 8, 1988 following review of the information used for the initial classification. 2. Today's Action

The EPA is,by this notice, providing technical corrections to clarify the descriptions ofseveral Group I and II areas ofconcern. The EPA described the areas ofconcern generally as cities, towns, counties, or planning areas in the August 7, 1987notice and stated that these descriptions were only initial definitions ofthe areas to be investigated in the PM-10 SIP development process. The EPA had previously provided guidance on procedures fordetermining the boundaries ofareas not attaining the standards in section 2.5 of the PM-10 SIPDevelopment Guideline and in section 6.3 ofProcedures for Estimating Probability ofNonattainment ofa PM10 NAAQS Using Total Suspended Particulate orPM-10 Data,EPA-450/4- 86-017, December 1986.

State air pollution control agencies, in developing SIP's for Group Iand certain Group II areas over the past 3 years, have been collecting data on source emissions and ambient PM-10 concentrations, identifying control measures, and predicting future PM-10 concentrations using dispersion models. Consequently, EPA can now more clearly define the extent ofcertain 

### Federal Register / Vol. 55,

HeinOnline -- 55 Fed. Reg. 45799 1990

### 45800 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 1990 / Rules and Regulations Group Iand IIareas. However, many of 3.Group IArea Descriptions Register notice is revisedto read as the area descriptions published in the The listofGroup Iareas ofconcern follows: August 7. 1987 noticeremain unchanged. published inthe August 7,

### 1987Federal GROUP IAREAS 1,2,3
State and counties Area of concern Alaska:

Anchorage .............................................................................................. Juneau ................................ Arizona

Cochise.......... .................... Pima ........................................................................................................ M

aricopa and Pinal................................................................................ Yuma....................................................................................................... Pinal and Gita...................................................................................
California:



### lnyo
......................................................................................................... San Bemardino, lnyo. and Kern ................................................... Mono .......................................................................................................
Fresno, Kern, Kings, and Tulare......................................................... Riverside, Los Angeles, Orange and.San Bernardino ...................... Riverside........................................................................................... - Imperial

................................................................................................ Colorado:

Archuleta................................................................................................. Adams, Denver, Arapahoe, Jefferson, Douglas and Boulder .........
San Miguel........................................................................................ Prowers.................................................................................................. Pitkin....................................................................................................... Fremont.................................................................................................. Connecticut:

New Haven............................................................................. . Idaho:

Ada........................................... *

.........................................................

Shoshone............................................................................................... Bannock and Power ........................................................................ Illinois:

Cook....................................................................................................... Madison ................................................................................. . Indiana: Lake............................................................................................. M

aine: Aroostook ..................................................................................... Michigan: Wayne ......................................................................................

Minnesota: Ramsey.................................................................................. Community of Eagle River. City of Juneau: Mendenhall Valley area. Paul Spur/Douglas planning area: Township 23 south, Range 25 east (T23S, R25E)T23S, R26E:

T23S, R27E; T23S, R28E; T24S, R25E; T24S, R26E; T24S, R27E; T24S, R28E. Ritlito planning area: Townships: TttS, R9E; TtlS, R1DE; TitS, RIIE; TI1S. R12E; T12S. R8E:

T12S, R9E: T12S, R10E; T12S, R11E; T12S, R12E; Phoenix planning area: The rectangle determined by, and including, T6N, R3W; T6N, R7E; T2S,

R3W; T2S, R7E; TIN, ABE. Yuma planning area: Townships: T7S-R21W, R22W; T8S-R21W, R22W, R23W, R24W; T9SR21W, R22W, R23W, R24W, R25W; T1OS-R21W, R22W, R23W, R24W, R25W. Hayden/Miami planning area: Townships: T4S, R16E; T5S, R16E, T6S. R16E; plus the portion of

Township T3S, Rt6E, that does not lie on the San Carlos Indian Reservation, and the rectangle formed by, and including,Townships TIN, R13E; T6S, RI3E; TiN, R15E; T6S, RISE. Owens Valley planning area: Hydrologic Unit # 18090103. Searles Valley planning area: Hydrologic Unit # 18090205. Mammoth Lake planning area: Includes the following sections: a. Sections 1-12. 17. and 18 of

Township T4S, R28E; b. sections 25-36 of Township T3S, R28E; c. Sections 25-36 of Township T3S, R27E; d. Sections 1-18 of Township T4S, R27E; and e. Sections 25 and 36 of Township T3S, R26E. San Joaquin Valley planning area. South Coast Air Basin. Coachella Valley planningarea. ImperialValley planning area. Pagosa Springs. Denver Metropolitan area: All of Denver, Jefferson, and Douglas Counties, Boulder County

(excluding the Rocky Mountain National Park) and the Colorado automobile inspection and readjustment program portions of Adams and Arapahoe Counties. Telluride. Lamar. Aspen. Canon City. City of New Haven. Boise: Northern Boundary-Beginning at a point in the center of the channel of the Boise River,

where the line between sections 15 and 16 in township 3 north (T3N). range 4 east (R4E), crosses said Boise River; thence west down the center of the channel of the Boise River to a point opposite the mouth of More's Creek; thence, in a straight line north 44 degrees and 38 minutes west until the said line intersects the north fine of T5N (12 Ter. Ses.67); thence west to the northwest corner T5N, RIW; Western Boundary-Thence, south to the northwest comer of T3N, R1W; thence east to the northwest corner of section 4 of T3N, RIW; thence south to the southeast comer of section 32 of T2N, R1W; thence west to the northwest comer of TiN. RIW; thence, south to the southwest corner of section 32 of T2N, RIW, thence, west to the northwest comer of TiN, RIW; thence south to the southwest corner of TIN, RiW; Southern Boundary-Thence, east to the southwest corner of section 33 of TIN. Ft4E; Eastern Boundary-Thence, north along the north and south center line of Townships TiN, R4E, T2N, R4E, and T3N, R4E, Boise Meridian to the beginning pbint in the center of the channel of the Boise River. City of Pinehurst. City ofPocatello.
a. Lyons Township; b. The area bounded on the north by 79th Street, on the west by Route 57,

on the south by Sibley Boulevard and on the east by the Illinois/Indiana State line. Granite CityTownship and Nameoki Township. Cities of East Chicago, Hammond, Whiting, and Gary. City of Presque Isle. The area bounded by Michigan Avenue from its intersection with 1-75 west to 1-94, 1-94

southwest to Greenfield Road, Greenfield Road south to Schaefer Road, Schaefer Road south and east to Jefferson Avenue, Jefferson Avenue south Biddle Avenue through the city of Wyandotte) to Sibley Avenue, Sibley Avenue west to Fort Street, Fort Street south to King Road. King Road east to Jefferson Avenue, Jefferson Avenue south to Helen Road, Helen Road east extended to Trenton Channel, Trenton Channel north to the Detroit River, the Detroit River north to the Ambassador Bridge, Ambassador Bridge to 1-75, 1-75 to Michigan Avenue. The area bound by the Mississippi River from Lafayette to Route 494, Route 494 east to Route

61. Route 61 north to 1-94. 1-94 west to Lafayette, and Lafayette south to the Mississippi River.

HeinOnline -- 55 Fed. Reg. 45800 1990

### *Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 211 / Wednesday; October. 31, 1990 / Rules and Regulations ,45801.

GROUP I AREAS 

### 1, 2

### ,3

### -Continued
State and counties Area of concern Montana:

Flathead
......................................................... *

......................................

Lincoln.................................................................................................... Lake .................................................................... ........................... M

issoula
............................................... ............................................ Rosebud

..................................... Silver Bow
.............................................................................................. Nevada:

W

ashoe
............................................................................................. Clark.......... ........................................ .... ... ................................. New M exico: Dona Ana................................. ......... ........................... Ohio:

.Cuyahoga ............................. .......................................................... Jefferson

..................................... Oregon:,

jacksUr n..................................... ......... . ....................................... ;............ Josephine....................................... I

.......................................... Lane

........................................ Klamath................... . ............................ exas: El Paso: ................................................................................ Utah:

.

Salt Lake

...... : ............................... Utah........................................................ ..................................... West Virginia: Brooke ............................................................. Washington:

King

.. ..... ............ ..........................................................

Pierce......................... ............................................................ . .
Spokane
............... .......................

Yakima...............................

.......................................................

Thurston ............................... ........................ WailWto ........... I.........................

................................................... Wyoming: Sheridan...................... ... ............... Wyomin :Sherdan'.

............ ... ................ :..................... ................. The area bounded by lines from Universal Transmercator (UTM) coordinate 700000mE, 5347000mN, east to 704000mE, 5347000mN, south to 704000mE, 5341OOOmN, west to 703000mE, 5341000mN,. south to 70300mE, 5340000mN, west to 702000mE, 5340000mN, south to 702000mE, 5339000mN, east to 703000mE, 5339000mN, south to 703000mE, 5338000mN. east to 704000mE, 5338000mN, south to 704000mE, 5336000mN, west to

- 702000mE, 5336000mN, south to702000mE, 5335000mN, west to 700000mE, 5335000mN, north to 70000mE, 5340000mN, west to 695000mE, 5340000mN, north to 695000mE. 5345000mN, east to'700000mE, 5345000mN, north to 700000mE, 5347000mN. Libby. Ronan, Poison. Township T13N, R19W sections 2, 8, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, East 19, 20, 21, 22. 23, 24, 27, 28, 29,.

East 1/2 30. East 1/2 31, 32, 33,34, andT12N, R19W, section4, 5,6, 7. Lame Deer. Butte Reno planning area: Hydrographic area 87. Las Vegas planning area: Hydrographic Area 212. The area bounded by Anthony Quadrangle, Anthony. New Mexico-Texas, SE/4 La Mesa 15

Quadrangle, N3200-W10630/7.5. Township 26S, Range 3E, Sections 35 and 36 as limited.by the Nex Mexico-Texas State line on the south. County. The portion of the City of Steubenville south to Market Street, plus the area bounded on.the

north by the southern boundary of the City'of Steubenville, on the west by Ohio Route #7, on the south by the southern border of SteubenvilleTownship, and on the east by the Ohio/West Virginia border. Medfprd-Ashland air quality maintenance area (including White City), Grants Pass: The area within the urban growth boundary. Eugene/Springfield: The areawithin the urban growth boundary. Klamath Falls: The area within the urban growth boundary. City of El Paso. County. County. Follansbee area bounded on the northby the Market Street Bridge. on the east by West Virginia

Route #2, on the south by the extension of the southern boundary of Steubenville Township in Jefferson County, Ohio, and on the west by the Ohio/West Virginia border. The portion of the City of Seattle bounded on the east by 1-5/East Duwamish Greenbelt, on the

south by 104th Street, on the west 'by the West Duwamish Greenbelt north to Fairmont Avenue, SW., north on Fairmont to Elliott Bay, and Dearborn Street from Elliott Bay to 1-5; The city of Kent and a portion of the Green River valley bounded on east and west by the 100-foot contour, on the north by South 212th Street. and on the south by Highway 516. Tacoma metropolitan area bounded on the north by Marine View Drive from Commencement Bay

east to the 100-foot contour, southeast along the 100-foot contour to 64th Avenue East, south along 64th Avenue East extended to I-5, I-5 west to the 100-foot contour near Pacific Avenue, and north along the 100-foot contour to Commencement Bay. The area bounded on the south by a line from Universal Transmercator (UTM) coordinate

489000mE, 52710OOmN, west to 458000mE, 5271000mN, thence north along a line to coordinate 458000mE, 5288000mN, thence east to 463000mE, 5288000mN, thence north to 463000mE, 5292000mN. thence east to 481000mE, 5292000mN, thence south to 481000mE, 5268000mN, thence east to 489000mE, 5288000, thence south to the beginning coordinate 489000mE, 5271000mN. The area bounded on the south by a line from .Universal Transmercator (UTM) coordinate

694000mW, 5157000mN, west to 681000mW, 5157000mN, thence north along a line to coordinate 681000mN, .5172000mN, thence east to 694000mW, 5172000mN, thence,south to the beginning coordinate 694000mW, 5157000mN. Cities of Olympia, Tumwater, and Lacey. Wallula. City of Sheridan. For convenience, the entire list of Group Iareas, as revised is published above., 2When cities or towns are shown,the area of concern is defined by the municipat boundary limits as of thedate of this notice. 3When a planning area is shown,,the area of concern includes the entire planning area unless the area is further defined (e.g., by township, range, and/or section)..


### 4. Group II Area.Descriptions

As a result ofadditional information acquired by the States the descriptions 

### of-certain areas ofconcern published in notice are revised to read as follows: theAugust 7,1987Federal Register T

HeinOnline -- 55 Fed. Reg. 45801 1990

### -*5802 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 211 

# / Wednesday, October 31, 1990 / Rules and Regulations

GROUP 11 AREAS 1. 2. 3
State and counties Area of concern Alabama: Jefferson
.................................................................................. Alaska: Fairbanks
..................................................................................... Arizona:

Coconino
................................................................................................ Graham .................................................................................................. Navajo................... ;............................................................................ Apache .................................................................................................. Santa Cruz
............................................................................................. Pima ....................................................................................................... Pima ....................................................................................................... Cochise
................................................................................................. Pinal ........................................................................................................ California:

Santa Clara
............................................................................................ San Joaquin and Stanislaus

.............................. Kern_ ............................ ....................................................... Los Angeles ................... ............................. ............................... Mono .......................................................................................... . Colorado:

Adams ..................................................................................................... Boulder.......................................................................... ... D elta ........ .. . . .... ............................................................. .. ...... ....- Eagle

................................ ....... El Paso............................................................................................. Garfield
.................................................................................................. Gunnison.............................................................................................. Routt....................................................................................................... Mesa.................................................................................................... Weld
................................................................................................... Guam : Piti
................................................................................................... Idaho:

Bonner
................................................................................................... Caribou
................................................................................................... Illinois:



### LaSalle

................................................................................................ Randolph
............................................................................................... Macon ..............-.. ............ Rock Island

........................................................................................ Win... .................. . . . . . ........................ St. C air
. .... ......... ................................................................................ DuPage ............................................................................. ... Indiana:



### Marion

.... ............. . . ........................ Vigo ....-. ..................................... ......................................................... Porter .................................................................................................... Iowa:

Cerro Gordo

........... .................. Linn

................... . .... . ........................................................ Polk........................................................................................................ Kansas: Wyandotte
................................................................................. Kentucky: Boyd
.......................................................................................... Maryland: Baltimore .............................................................................. Michigan:

Saginaw
................................................................................ . Monroe .............................................................................. ................. Minnesota:

Hennepin
.............................................................................................. St. Louis................................................................................................. Itasca..................................... :.......................................................... Lake........................................................................................................ Stearns
............................................................................... ................. Montana:

Blaine
..................................................................................................... Flathead
.................................................................................................. Deer Lodge............................................................................................. Lewis &Clark................................................................ ... Sanders
.................................................................................................. Lincoln
.................................................................................................... Nebraska:

Cass
........................................................................................................ Douglas
................................................................................................... Nevada:

Lander, Humbolt, Elko, & Eureka
........................................................ New Jersey:

Hudson.................................................................................................... Camden
................................................................................................... New York: Onondaga
................................................................................ North Birmingham and Leeds. Fairbanks. Flagstaff planning area. Safford planning area. Show Low andJoseph City planning areas. Show Low planning area. Nogales planning area: ' The portions of the following Townships which are within the State of

Arizona and fie east of 11* longitude: T23S, R13E; T23S, R14E; T24S, R13E; T24S, R14E. Ajo planning area: 4 Township T12S, R6W, and thefollowing sections of Township T12S, R5W: a.

Sections6-8. b. Sections 17-20, and c.Sections 29-32. Tuscon planning area. Tuscon planning area. Casa Grande planning area. County. San Joaquin Valley planning area.4

. Southeast Desert Air Basin. Southest Oesert Air Basin. Mono Basin. Brighton. Longmont. Delta. Vail. Colorado Springs. Glenwood Springs, Rifle. Crested Butte. Steamboat Springs. Grand Junction, Fruita. Greeley. County. County.4

. Conda. Oglesby' Including the following townships, ranges, and sections: T32N RiE, S; T32N, R2E,

S6; T33N, RtE, S24:T33N, RlE. S25; T33N, R2E. S31; andT33N, RE, S36. Baldwin. Decatur. Rock Island. Moline. Joliet. East St. Louis. Addison. Subpart of Indianapolis. Terre Haute. County. Mason City. Cedar Rapids. Des Moines. Kansas City. Cattletsburg andAshland. Baltimore. Carrollton. Monroe. Minneapolis. Duluth and Iron Range. Iron Range. Two HarborsTownship. St Cloud Township. Hays. Columbia Falls: I Township T30N, R20W, Sections7,8. 9, 16, and 17. Anaconda. Helena. Thompson Falls. Eureka. Weeping Water. Omaha. Battle Mountain area. Jersey City. Camden. Solvay.

HeinOnline -- 55 Fed. Reg. 45802 1990

### Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 1990 

# I Rules and Regulations 45803
GROUP I1 AREAS 1. 2. 3

### -Continued State and counties Area of concern New Mexico:

Bernalillo ....................................................................................... Grant

.............................................. Santa Fe
................................................................................................. Sandoval ................................................................................................. Taus ........................................................................................................ Ohio:

W

yandot
.................................................................................................. Scioto ...................................................................................................... Trumbull
.................................................................................................. Lorain .............................................................................................. Butler
............................................................................................... Seneca
.................................................................................................... Sandusky.......................................................................................... Belmont

...................................... ..... Columbianna.......................................................................................... Franklin

........................... Hamilton.................................................................................................. Mahoning ...... .................. M

ontgomery .......................................................................................... Richland ........................................................................................ Stark
........................................................................................................ Summit
.................................................................................................... Oklahoma: Comanche

...................................... Oregon:

Deschutes
....................................................................................... Multinomah............................................................................................. Union ............. ...................................................................................... Lane . .. ..

. .... . ..................................................................................... Pennsylvania:.

Allegheny
........................................................................................

Philadelphia
............................................................................................ Erie..................................... . . . . . . .... Lawrence ............................................................................................. Mercer................................................................................................. Puerto Rico: San Juan.............................................................................. South Dakota: Pennington
....................................................................... Texas:

Dallas

............................ Harris
......................................................................................................

Lubbock
................................................................................................. Nueces................................................................................................... Virginia: Buchanan
.................................................................................... Washington:

Benton
.................................................................................................... King
......................................................................................................... West Virginia:

Hancock ................................................................................................. Brooke ..................................................................................................... Wisconsin:

Brown...................................................................................................... Milwaukee ............................................................................................... Waukesha .............................................................................................. Douglas................................................................................................... Dane........................................................................................................ Wyoming: Fremont .................................................................................... County. 5

. County. County. County. County Carey. New Boston. Warren, Howland Township. Sheffield Township. Middletown. Thompson Township. Jackson Township. Martins Ferry. East Liverpool. Columbus. Cincinnati. Youngstown. Dayton. Mansfield. Canton. Akron. County. Bend. Portland. LaGrande: 4the area within the urban growth boundary. Oakridge: 5thearea withinthe urban growth boundary.
a. The triangular area bounded on the north by an east-west line passing through the North

Braddock monitor (at 600 Anderson Street) and intersecting the center line of the Monogahela River. and on theeast by a north-south linepassing through the East Pittsburgh monitor (at the intersection of Cliff Street and Draper Street) and intersecting the center line of the Monongahela River; b.The area including Liberty, Lincoln, Port Vue. and Glassport Boroughs and the Cityof Clairton.4 Bndesburg-Port Richmond. County. County. County. San Juan. Rapid City. That portion of the City of Dallasenclosed by Loop 12 highway. The area bounded on the north side by a line extending eastward from Bennet Street starting at

the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks at the intersection of Bennet Street and Clinton Drive and ending at the intersection of Bennet and Legget Streets, on the east side,along Legget Street southward to Clinton Drive, thence eastward to the intersection of Mayo Shell Road, and thence southward again to the Ship Channel, on the south side, westward along the south edge of the Ship Channel, including Brady Island, to East Erath Street and connectingwith the Southern Pacific railroad, on the west side, northward along the southern Pacific Railroad to theintersection of Clinton Drive and Bennet Street. That portion ofthe City of Lubbock ' enclosed by Loop 289 highway. That portion of the City of Corpus Christi, bounded by Nueces Bay on the north, Ocean Drive on

the east, Highway 44 on the south, and aline due north from Highway 44 at the intersection of Highway 358to Nueces Bay on the west. County. County.5 Bellevue. City of Wierton.5 Remainder of county. DePere. Milwaukee. Waukesha. Superior. Madison. Lander. IFor convenience, the entire list of Group IIareas, as revised, is published above. 2When cities or towns are shown, the area of concern is defined by the municipal boundary limits as of the date of this notice. 3When a planning area is shown, the area of concern includes the entire planning area unless the area is further defined (e.g., by township, range, and/or section). 4 The State has recorded violationsof the PM-10 NAAOS based upon air qualitydata through December 31, 1988. 5The State hasrecorded violations of the PM-10 NAAOS based upon air quality data through December 31, 1989.

HeinOnline -- 55 Fed. Reg. 45803 1990

### 45804 Federal Register 

# /Vol. 55, No. 211 

# I Wednesday, October 31, 1990 

# I Rules and Regulations Authority: Sections 110and 301ofthe CleanAir Act give the Administrator authority to adopt policies necessary to implement NAAQS.

Dated: October22, 1990. William G.Rosenberg, Assistant Administrtorfor Airand Radiation. IFRDoc.90-25518 Filed 10-30-90; 8:45am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-M


### 40 CFR Part 61 [AD-FRL-3856-41 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants;Benzene EmissionsFrom Chemical Manufacturing Process Vents, IndustrilalSolvent Use, Benzene Waste Operations, Benzene Transfer Operations, and Gasoline Marketing System; Correction AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule; correction. SUMMARY: This document clarifies the applicability of§ 61.300(a) of the National Emission Standard for Benzene Transfer Operations which was promulgated in the Federal Register on Wednesday, March 7, 1990 (55 FR 8341). This action is necessary to clarify that the benzene transfer rule does not apply to the loading ofcrude oil, natural gas' liquids orpetroleum distillates such as fuel oil, diesel or kerosene. It was never EPA's intent that the benzene transfer rule apply to crude oil, natural gas liquids orpetroleum distillates. The benzene content ofthese materials is well below the 70 percent cutoff in the regulation and will never approach this cutoff.

This notice also changes the applicability date of § 61.300(e) ofthe regulation as it applies to the loading of benzene into marine vessels. This change isnecessary to allow facilities adequate time to design, purchase and install vapor control systems that comply with the U.S. Coast Guard standards that were issued June 21, 1990 (55 FR 25396) and that are effective July 23, 1990. This correction is consistent with EPA's intent to provide an industry-wide waiver of1year so that facilities can take into consideration the Coast Guard standards that address safe design, installation and operation of marine vessel vapor control systems. EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7, 1990. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

### Mr. Doug Bell at (919) 541-5568 orMs. Laura Butler, (919) 541-5267, Standards Development Branch, ESD (MD-13), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.

Dated: October 23, 1990. 

### Michael Shapiro, ActingAssistant Administrator for Airand Radiation.

For reasons set out in the preamble, title40, chapter I,part 61 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 61-[AMENDED]

1.The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:

Authority: Secs. 101, 112. 114, 116, 301 of theClean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401,7412,7414,7416,7601).



### 2. Section 61.300 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (e) to read as follows: §61.300 Applicability.



### (a) The affected facility to which this subpart applies is the total ofall.loading racks at which benzene isloaded into tank trucks, railcars, or marine vessels at each benzene production facility and each bulk terminal. However, specifically exempted from this regulation are loading racks at which only the following are loaded: Benzeneladen waste (covered under subpart FF ofthis part), gasoline, crude oil, natural gas liquids, petroleum distillates (e.g., fuel oil, diesel, or kerosene), or benzeneladen liquid from coke by-product

- 

### recovery plants. ,* • * * * 

### (e) The owner oroperator ofan affected facility, as defined in §61.300(a) thatloads a marine vessel shall be in compliance with the. provisions ofthis subpart on and after July 23, 1991. Ifan affected facility that loads a marine vessel also loads a tank truck orrailcar, the marine vessel loading racks shall be in compliance with the provisions ofthis subpart on and after July 23, 1991, while the tank truck loading racks and the railcar loading racks shall be in compliance as required by §61.12. 

### [FRDoc. 90-25731 Filed 10-30-90; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-M


### 40 CFR Part 761 [OPTS-62035J; FRL 3801-21 PolychlorinatedBiphenyls in ElectricalTransformers; Correction AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: 

### Finalrule; correction. SUMMARY: 

### EPA 

### issued a final rule on polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in electrical transformers published in the Federal Register issue of July 19, 1988 (53 FR 27322). In the codified text of § 761.30(a)(1)(v), EPA inadvertently omitted subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C). This document corrects that error by reinserting these subparagraphs. EFFECTIVE DATE: This correction is effective October 31, 1990. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION- CONTACT: 

### Michael M. Stahl,Director Environmental Assistance Division (TS799), Office ofToxic Substances, Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. E-543B, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 554-1404, TDD: (202) 554- 0551. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:



### EPA issued a final rule on PCBs in electrical transformers published in the Federal Register issue ofJuly 19, 1988 (53 FR 27322), in which §761.30(a)(1)(v) was revised.It wasnot EPA's intent to delete subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) from paragraph (a)(1)(v) when the Federal Register notice was published. EPA intended only to revise the introductory text ofparagraph (a)(1)(v). This document corrects § 761.30(a)(1)(v) by reinserting subparagraphs (A), (B), and 

### (C). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 761

Environmental protection, Hazardous substances, Labeling, Polychlorinated biphenyls, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: September 10, 1990. Charles L.Elkins, Director, Office ofToxicSubstances. Therefore, 40 CFR part 761 is amended as follows: PART 761- [AMENDED]

1.The authority citation forpart 761 continues-to read as follows::

Authority: 15U.S.C. 2605, 2607, 2611, 2614, and

### 2616.

2. In § 761.30 by correctly revising paragraph (a)(1)(v) to read as follows: §761.30 Authorizations.

(a) * * * 

## (1)* * * 

### (v)As ofOctober 1, 1990, all radial PCB Transformers with higher secondary voltages (480volts and above, including 480/277 volt systems) 

### 45804 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 211 / Wednesday, October 31, 1990 / Rules and Regulations

HeinOnline -- 55 Fed. Reg. 45804 1990