alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PD.43899806.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 20-21808-CIV-SCOLA 

TODD BENJAMIN INTERNATIONAL, LTD. and 

TODD BENJAMIN, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

GRANT THORNTON CAYMAN ISLANDS, 

and GRANT THORNTON IRELAND, 

Defendants. 

/ 

NOTICE OF PENDING, REFILED, RELATED OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

In accordance with Local Rule 3.8, Defendant Grant Thornton Cayman Islands (“GT 

Cayman”) files its Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions as follows: 

1. S.E.C. v. TCA Fund Management Group Corp. et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-21964-

CMA, in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division (“SEC 

Action”). The SEC Action concerns the Security and Exchange Commission’s action to enjoin 

further alleged violations of the federal securities laws by defendants TCA Fund Management 

Group Corp. and TCA Global Credit Fund GP, Ltd. As part of the SEC Action, the court appointed 

Jonathan E. Perlman as receiver over the TCA entities. 

2. Jonathan E. Perlman, Esq., as Court-Appointed Receiver of TCA Fund 

Management Group Corp., et al. v. Bolder Fund Services (USA), LLC et al., Case No. 1:23-cv23988-FAM, in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division 

(“Bolder Action”). The Bolder Actions concerns claims for breach of contract, breach of duty by 

gross negligence, breach of duty by willful default, dishonest assistance, negligence, aiding and 

Case 1:20-cv-21808-RNS Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2023 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

PD.43899806.1 

abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and aiding and abetting fraud brought by Jonathan E. Perlman 

as the court-appointed Receiver of the TCA entities against Bolder Fund Services (USA), LLC, 

Bolder Fund Services (Cayman), Ltd., and Bolder Group Holding B.V. 

Dated: December 15, 2023 

 s/Michael S. Hooker

John D. Mullen | FBN 0032883 

 john.mullen@phelps.com 

Michael S. Hooker | FBN 0330655 

 michael.hooker@phelps.com 

PHELPS DUNBAR LLP

100 South Ashley Drive, Suite 2000 

Tampa, Florida 33602-5315 

813-472-7550 

Counsel for Grant Thornton Cayman Islands 

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was electronically filed 

this 15th day of December, 2023, with the Clerk of the Court by using the Court’s CM/ECF 

system, which will send notice of electronic filing, via email, to all counsel or parties of record, 

including those on the Service List below. 

__s/Michael S. Hooker

Counsel for Grant Thornton Cayman Islands

Case 1:20-cv-21808-RNS Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2023 Page 2 of 2
### §5606. Penalty relating to containers of distilled spirits

Whoever violates any provision of section 5301, or of any regulation issued pursuant thereto, or the terms or conditions of any permit issued pursuant to the authorization contained in such section, and any officer, director, or agent of any corporation who knowingly participates in such violation, shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both, for each such offense.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1402.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5606, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 684, related to penalty and forfeiture for distilling without giving bond, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859. See sections 5601(a)(4), 5602, and 5615(3) of this title.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior section 5641, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 692, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Washita Battlefield
National Historic Site
Oklahoma


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  A Walk in the Park
 The paved and unpaved sections of the park trailWashita Battlefield - Paved and Unpaved Sections of the Park Trail NPS Photo**Washita Battlefield Park Trail**
Visit the location of Lt. Col. Custer's attack on Chief Black Kettle's village. Drive 1/2 mile west of the visitor center on HWY 47A to the overlook and trailhead.
The 1.5 mile trail is self guided.
Trail brochures are available to borrow at the trail entrance and will explain 15 numbered stops along the trail. Half of the trail is paved and wheelchair accessible down to the site of Black Kettle's village and the Washita River. The second half of the loop back to the overlook is an unimproved, dirt and grass path .
The trail receives no winter maintenance so snow and ice may be present following winter storms.

Paved trail going through open fieldThe Dust and Fire Trail NPS Photo**The Dust and Fire Trail**
This is a 1/2 mile paved trail around the visitor center. Created by the US Forest Service, the Dust and Fire trail examines life on the plains after the land run. Explore flora, fauna, a dugout house, and even a working wind mill. Don't forget while spending time on the trail to stop by the Native Garden.
 Last updated: December 20, 2020
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 18555 Hwy 47A, Ste. A
Cheyenne,
OK
73628
 Phone: 580 497-2742 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
§ 105.402 Standards of Conduct Counselors. ( a ) The SBA Standards of Conduct Counselor is the Designated Agency Ethics Official, as appointed by the Administrator. Assistant Standards of Conduct Counselors may be designated by the Standards of Conduct Counselor.
( b ) The Standards of Conduct Counselors and Assistants: ( 1 ) Provide general advice, assistance and guidance to employees concerning this part and the regulations referred to in § 105.101;
( 2 ) Monitor the Standards of Conduct Program within their assigned areas and provide required reports thereon; and
( 3 ) Review Confidential Financial Disclosure reports as required under 5 CFR part 2634, subpart I, and provide an annual report on compliance with filing requirements to the SBA Standards of Conduct Counselor as of February 1 of each year.
( c ) Each employee will be periodically informed of the name, address and telephone number of the Assistant Standards of Conduct Counselor to contact for advice and assistance.
( d ) Employee requests for advice or rulings should be directed to the appropriate Standards of Conduct Counselor for appropriate action.
[61 FR 2399, Jan. 26, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 48477, Sept. 16, 1997; 69 FR 63922, Nov. 3, 2004]
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Natural Sounds





Contact Us
  In the Field
 request technical assistance
 Why Sounds Matter  Noise
 Sampling Scheme To define sampling areas within a park, we identify areas with similar vegetation, land cover, topography, elevation, and climate that typically contain similar animals, physical processes, and other sources of natural sounds. Areas with similar attributes have similar natural sound sources, sound levels, propagation and attenuation properties, and other acoustic qualities. Once the primary sampling areas have been identified, measurement locations are selected to ensure that all of the primary sampling areas of the park are sampled. Acoustic specialists/technicians consider specific measurement locations within sampling areas relative to other factors such as park resources, park management zones, visitor use, and wildlife habitats.
 Installation of sound equipment at Granite LakeInstallation of sound equipment at Granite Lake, Yosemite National Park NPS Site Selection In most situations, the principal consideration in selecting measurement locations is to ensure that representative data are collected for all primary sampling areas of the park. Additional considerations include, in rough order of priority: Park management zones and their soundscape management objectives
Specific sound-sensitive areas
Specific acoustical data needs
Proximity to natural and human-caused sounds
Equipment considerations (security, solar exposure, visibility, etc.)
 
 Two images of sound monitoring equipment on tripods with mountains in the background. One image is green summer, the other snowy winter.This acoustic site in Denali National Park & Preserve was monitored in both winter and summer seasons. NPS Photo
 Duration To determine how long to record, acoustic technicians consider the daily and seasonal variability of acoustic conditions in parks. Measurements taken at a particular site need to be long enough to ensure statistical confidence in the data. However, practical and other resource considerations are also important. Research shows that measurement periods of at least 25 days limit the uncertainty of ambient data to less than three decibels. For some situations or environments, shorter or longer measurement periods may be needed.
 Acoustic Monitoring ReportsSound Data Summaries Source: Data Store Collection  2389. To search for additional information, visit the Data Store.
 Last updated: August 20, 2018
 Tools Calendar
Site Index
Contact Us


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert O. Carr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.


Date: February 28, 2012


/s/ Robert O. CarrRobert O. CarrChief Executive Officer
----

----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  |                 |                                                                       |
|-----------------------|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | APPLETON PAPERS INC. |
|                  |                 |                                                                       |
| Dated: March 11, 2011 |                 |  /s/ Thomas J. Ferree                                            |
|                  | Name:                |  Thomas J. Ferree                                                     |
|                  | Title:               |  Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
### §1337. Commerce and antitrust regulations; amount in controversy, costs

(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action or proceeding arising under any Act of Congress regulating commerce or protecting trade and commerce against restraints and monopolies: Provided, however, That the district courts shall have original jurisdiction of an action brought under section 11706 or 14706 of title 49, only if the matter in controversy for each receipt or bill of lading exceeds $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs.

(b) Except when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States, where a plaintiff who files the case under section 11706 or 14706 of title 49, originally in the Federal courts is finally adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the sum or value of $10,000, computed without regard to any setoff or counterclaim to which the defendant may be adjudged to be entitled, and exclusive of any interest and costs, the district court may deny costs to the plaintiff and, in addition, may impose costs on the plaintiff.

(c) The district courts shall not have jurisdiction under this section of any matter within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under chapter 95 of this title.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 931; Pub. L. 95–486, §9(a), Oct. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 1633; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §505, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743; Pub. L. 97–449, §5(f), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2442; Pub. L. 104–88, title III, §305(a)(3), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 944.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(8), (23) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, pars. 8, 23, 36 Stat. 1092, 1093; Oct. 22, 1913, ch. 32, 38 Stat. 219).

Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits", in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1995—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 104–88 substituted "11706 or 14706" for "11707".

1983—Pub. L. 97–449 substituted "section 11707 of title 49" for "section 20(11) of part I of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. 20(11)) or section 219 of part II of such Act (49 U.S.C. 319)" wherever appearing.

1980—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–417 added subsec. (c).

1978—Pub. L. 95–486 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted proviso giving the district courts original jurisdiction of actions brought under sections 20(11) and 219 of the Interstate Commerce Act when the amounts in controversy for each receipt exceed $10,000, exclusive of interests and costs, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1995 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–88 effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1301 of Title 49, Transportation.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Tuskegee Airmen NHS Hangar 2

Tuskegee Airmen National Historic Site
#### § 4.1019 How may a party submit prior Departmental final decisions?

A party may submit as an appendix to a motion, brief, or other filing a prior Departmental final decision in support of a finding that the evidence or methodology is sufficient to satisfy one or more criteria for Federal acknowledgment of the petitioner because the Department found that evidence or methodology sufficient to satisfy the same criteria in the prior decision.
#### Robert E. Dimeo *v.*Burns, Brooks & McNeil, Inc., et al.

*Herbert Watstein,*in support of the petition.

*Joseph T. Sweeney,*in opposition.

Decided March 26, 1986

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 6 Conn. App. 241, is denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Insightful Corporation for
the quarter ended March 31, 2007, I, Jeffrey E. Coombs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Insightful Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | such Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Insightful Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ JEFFREY E. COOMBSJeffrey E. CoombsPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


May 15, 2007
HomeAbout NRCFire Protection

# Fire Protection for Operating Reactors

On March 22, 1975, a fire at the Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant, operating near Decatur, Alabama, fundamentally changed the concept of fire protection and associated regulatory requirements for U.S. nuclear power plants (NPPs). After that fire, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) revised its fire protection regulations to ensure plant safety by reducing the likelihood of fire and the consequences of any fires that might occur. Each licensee must maintain a robust fire protection program and ensure the ability to shut down the reactor safely in the event of a fire. The NRC also uses operational experience and information about actual fire events in the United States and elsewhere to apply the lessons learned to regulatory decisions affecting commercial nuclear power plants. Since the Browns Ferry Fire, no subsequent fire at a U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has affected the safe operation of a reactor. All current operating reactor facilities are operating safely.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Fire Protection for Operating Reactors
          - Fire Protection for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities
          - Fire  Safety Research
          - Related Information

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Related Information

            - Fire Protection Program for Operating Reactors
            - Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection
            - Defense-In-Depth
            - Fact Sheet on Nuclear Power Plant Fire Protection
            - Fire Safety Research

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, March 20, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

CASE NO.: 9:20-cv-80929-DMM 

HOWARD COHAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TURNPIKE DONUTS LLC, 

d/b/a DUNKIN DONUTS, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff, HOWARD COHAN (“Plaintiff”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby 

files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of this Action with Prejudice pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and gives notice of the following: 

1. Defendant, TURNPIKE DONUTS LLC, d/b/a DUNKIN DONUTS (“Defendant”), 

has not filed an Answer or a Motion for Summary Judgment and therefore the dismissal of this 

action at Plaintiff’s request is proper pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 

2. This case shall be dismissed with Prejudice with each party bearing his/their own 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

BY: /s/ Jason S. Weiss 

Jason S. Weiss 

Jason@jswlawyer.com

Florida Bar No. 356890 

 WEISS LAW GROUP, P.A. 

5531 N. University Drive, Suite 103 

Coral Springs, FL 33067 

Tel: (954) 573-2800 

Fax: (954) 573-2798 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 9:20-cv-80929-DMM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 24th day of June, 2020, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which automatically gives 

notice to all counsel of record. 

BY: /s/ Jason S. Weiss 

Jason S. Weiss 

Jason@jswlawyer.com

Florida Bar No. 356890 

Case 9:20-cv-80929-DMM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/24/2020 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TransAlta Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dawn L. Farrell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     | The Report fully   complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as   applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                            |
| 2.     | The information   contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the   financial condition and result of operations of the Company.        |

 

 

 
| /s/ Dawn L. Farrell                     |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Dawn L. Farrell                         |   |
| President and Chief   Executive Officer |   |

 

Dated: March 3, 2017

 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----