alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 176

**Question 176:** 10 CFR 20.1201 (a) (2) (ii) states a limit of "A shallow-dose equivalent of 50 rem (0.50 Sv) to the skin or to any extremity."
> 
(a) Can a person receive 50 rem shallow dose equivalent to the skin of the lower arm (extremity) and 50 rem shallow dose equivalent to the upper arm non-extremity), without having an overexposure?

(b) Can a person receive 50 rem shallow dose equivalent to the left upper arm, then the same dose to the right upper arm, without having an overexposure?

(c) Can a person receive 50 rem shallow dose equivalent to each extremity during one year?

**Answer:**
> 
(a) Yes, as long as the total shallow dose equivalent does not exceed 50 rem in either position. The skin of the extremity is not considered in the shallow-dose equivalent limit to the skin of the whole body. The annual limits are a shallow-dose equivalent of 50 rem (0.50 Sv) to the skin or to any extremity.

(b) Again, as long as it can be shown that the total shallow dose equivalent does not exceed 50 rem at any one location on the skin of the whole body, there is no violation. If the two different areas of the skin of the whole body each receives 50 rem total shallow dose equivalent during the year, then the limit has not been exceeded.

(c) Yes. The regulation states ". . . or to any extremity;" therefore, a worker may receive a shallow-dose equivalent of 50 rem to each of the four extremities.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1201, 10 CFR 20.1003, Regulatory Guide 8.34)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, November 08, 2017
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 0:20-cv-61227-RKA Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 0:20-cv-61227-RKA Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 3864.1-1 Application for patent. ( a ) Land entered as a millsite must be shown to be nonmineral. Millsites are simply auxiliary to the working of mineral claims. R.S. 2337 (30 U.S.C. 42) provides for the patenting of millsites.
( b ) To avail themselves of this provision of law, parties holding the possessory right to a vein or lode claim, and to a piece of nonmineral land not contiguous thereto for mining or milling purposes, not exceeding the quantity allowed for such purpose by R.S. 2337, or prior laws, under which the land was appropriated, the proprietors of such vein or lode may file in the proper office their application for a patent, which application, together with the plat and field notes, may include, embrace, and describe, in addition to the vein or lode claim, such noncontiguous millsite, and after due proceedings as to notice, etc., a patent will be issued conveying the same as one claim. The owner of a patented lode may, by an independent application, secure a millsite, if good faith is manifest in its use or occupation in connection with the lode and no adverse claim exists.
( c ) The Act of March 18, 1960 (74 Stat. 7; 43 U.S.C. 42(b)), amends R.S. 2337 to allow the holders of possessory right in a placer claim to hold nonmineral land for mining, milling, processing beneficiation, or other operations in connection with the placer claim. Applications for patent for such millsites are subject to the same requirements as to survey and notice as one applicable to placer mining claims. No one millsite may exceed five acres and payment will be $2.50 per acre or fraction thereof.
§ 127.201 What are the requirements for ownership of an EDWOSB and WOSB? ( a ) *General.* To qualify as an EDWOSB one or more economically disadvantaged women must unconditionally and directly own at least 51 percent of the concern. To qualify as a WOSB, one or more women must unconditionally and directly own at least 51 percent of the concern. Ownership will be determined without regard to community property laws.
( b ) *Requirement for unconditional ownership.* To be considered unconditional, the ownership must not be subject to any conditions, executory agreements, voting trusts, or other arrangements that cause or potentially cause ownership benefits to go to another (other than after death or incapacity). The pledge or encumbrance of stock or other ownership interest as collateral, including seller-financed transactions, does not affect the unconditional nature of ownership if the terms follow normal commercial practices and the owner retains control absent violations of the terms.
( c ) *Requirement for direct ownership.* To be considered direct, the qualifying women must own 51 percent of the concern directly. The 51 percent ownership may not be through another business entity or a trust (including employee stock ownership plan) that is, in turn, owned and controlled by one or more women or economically disadvantaged women. However, ownership by a trust, such as a living trust, may be treated as the functional equivalent of ownership by a woman or economically disadvantaged woman where the trust is revocable, and the woman is the grantor, the trustee, and the sole current beneficiary of the trust.
( d ) *Ownership of a partnership.* In the case of a concern that is a partnership, at least 51 percent of each class of partnership interest must be unconditionally owned by one or more women or in the case of an EDWOSB, economically disadvantaged women. The ownership must be reflected in the concern's partnership agreement. For purposes of this requirement, general and limited partnership interests are considered different classes of partnership interest.
( e ) *Ownership of a limited liability company.* In the case of a concern that is a limited liability company, at least 51 percent of each class of member interest must be unconditionally owned by one or more women or in the case of an EDWOSB, economically disadvantaged women.
( f ) *Ownership of a corporation.* In the case of a concern that is a corporation, at least 51 percent of each class of voting stock outstanding and 51 percent of the aggregate of all stock outstanding must be unconditionally owned by one or more women, or in the case of an EDWOSB, economically disadvantaged women. In determining unconditional ownership of the concern, any unexercised stock options or similar agreements held by a woman will be disregarded. However, any unexercised stock option or other agreement, including the right to convert non-voting stock or debentures into voting stock, held by any other individual or entity will be treated as having been exercised.
[75 FR 62282, Oct. 7, 2010, as amended at 88 FR 26214, Apr. 27, 2023]
(No. 36691.

#### The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, *vs.*Robert King, Plaintiff in Error.

*Opinion filed February 1, 1963.*

Edward F. Downey, of Chicago, appointed by the court, for plaintiff in error.

William G. Clark, Attorney General, of Springfield, and Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Fred G. Leach and E. Michael O’Brien, Assistant Attorneys General, and Edward J. Hladis and Matthew J. Moran, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

*587Mr. Chief Justice Solfisburg

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant Robert King was indicted in the criminal court of Cook County on a charge of unlawful possession of narcotic drugs. He waived a jury, was found guilty by the court, and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than five nor more than ten years. He now brings writ of error, contending that the search of his person was in violation of the fourth amendment to the constitution of the United States, and of article II, section 2, of the constitution of the State of Illinois. He also contends that he was not found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Defendant’s claim of unlawful search and seizure is raised for the first time on this appeal. Defendant made no motion to suppress evidence of narcotics allegedly taken from his person, but denied that any narcotics were so taken. The narcotics were admitted into evidence without objection. It is, therefore, unnecessary to consider the legality of the search of defendant since no objection on that ground was raised upon the trial. *People*v. *Brengettsy,*25 Ill.2d 228; *People*v. *Valecek,*404 Ill. 461.

The arresting officer, one Burke, testified that he searched the defendant and others in an apartment containing about twelve people and found five hypodermic syringes and three tinfoil packets in the possession of defendant. The packets were later analyzed and found to contain a derivative of opium. Defendant concedes that he was searched, but insists that no narcotics were taken from him. Two of his co-defendants also claim that no narcotics were taken from King, although one of the co-defendants testified on cross-examination that at least three persons present in the apartment had narcotics. Defendant also admitted that he told officer Burke that he had used narcotics. We have reviewed the entire record and conclude that the trial judge could properly find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. *People*v. *Hyman,*24 Ill.2d 205.

*588The judgment of the criminal court of Cook County is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
(No. 1155

Claimant awarded $3,750.00.)

#### Minerva A. Miles, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 12, 1927.*

Workmen’s compensation *act*— when *award made under provisions of*An award may be made under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, although the State is not legally liable for the death of plaintiff’s intestate.

Mr. Robert E. Wright, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Merrill F. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The declaration filed • by claimant above named alleges that Frank Miles, the deceased husband of claimant, was dur*379ing Ms lifetime and at the time of his death an employee of the Division of. Highways of the Department of Public Works and Buildings of the State of Illinois; that the said Frank Miles was at said time employed as a laborer, engaged in maintaining a part of the hard-surfaced State Highway known as Route 11, extending north and east from Highland, Illinois; that on September 2, 1926, said Frank Miles while employed as aforesaid, in the excavation of gravel from a gravel pit then being operated by the State of Illinois, to provide gravel for repairing a detour known as Section Patrol No. 80066, received an injury by reason of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, which injury resulted from the fall of a large amount of gravel and earth onto the body of said Frank Miles, deceased; that within thirty days following the date of the death of said deceased, on, to-wit: September 15, 1926, claimant gave notice of said accidental injury and death to said Department of Public Works and Buildings, which said notice was given to Charles Slaymaker, division engineer of said Department of Public Works and Buildings, having charge of the part of said road on which deceased was employed as aforesaid; that said Frank Miles earned in Ms employment the sum of $21.60 per week and that said deceased left claimant, his widow, and no child or children whom he was under legal obligation to support, surviving him; and petitioner prays that she may be awarded the sum of $3,750.00 as compensation for the accidental injury and death as aforesaid.

A demurrer was filed by the Attorney Ceneral to the declaration, which, as a matter of law, is sustained.

We award claimant the amount which she would be entitled to receive if the deceased, Frank Miles, were employed under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the State of Illinois, or the sum of $3,750.00.
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of TransAlta Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for theyear ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the dated hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen G. Snyder, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934, as amended; and    |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |   |   |   |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and result of  operations of the Company. |   |   |
|        |                                                                                                                                                        |        |        |  |

 

 
| /s/ Stephen G.  Snyder                 |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen G.  Snyder                     |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

Dated:  March 15, 2007.

 

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Cancer Institute Board of Scientific Advisors.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Board of Scientific 
Advisors.
    Date: November 8-9, 2004.
    Time: November 8, 2004, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: Director's Report; Ongoing and New Business; Reports of 
Program Review Group(s); and Budget Presentation; Reports of Special 
Initiatives; RFA and RFP Concept Reviews; and Scientific 
Presentations.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Building 31, C Wing, 6th Floor, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Time: November 9, 2004, 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: Reports of Special Initiatives; RFA and RFP Concept 
Reviews; and Scientific Presentations.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Building 31, C Wing, 6th Floor, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Contact Person: Paulette S. Gray, PhD, Executive Secretary, 
Acting Director, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
8th Floor, Rm. 8001, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-5147.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/bsa.htm, where an agenda 
and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 6, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22991 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Isidore Cohn, Deceased. Bertha M. Ephrath, Appellant; Samuel Sapowich, as Public Administrator of Erie County, et al., Respondents.

Decree affirmed, with costs to all respondents filing separate briefs payable out of the estate. Stay vacated. All concur. (The decree denies petitioner’s application for issuance of letters to her and others *840named in her petition, and denies her motion to vacate letters issued to the public administrator.) Present — McCurn, Larkin, Love, Vaughan and Kim-ball, JJ. [189 Misc. 585.]
# Journal officiel C 232A/21 s

| | ISSN 1725-2431 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 232A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 48e année21 septembre 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2431

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 232A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

48e année21 septembre 2005

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informations |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 232A/1 | Publication d'un avis de vacance pour un poste de directeur exécutif de l'Agence communautaire de contrôle des pêches (grade A*14) — COM/2005/10004 | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

III   Informations

Commission

2005/C 232A/1

Publication d'un avis de vacance pour un poste de directeur exécutif de l'Agence communautaire de contrôle des pêches (grade A*14) — COM/2005/10004

1

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

III Informations

Commission

| 21.9.2005 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2005

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 232/1

---

PUBLICATION D'UN AVIS DE VACANCE POUR UN POSTE DE DIRECTEUR EXÉCUTIF DE L'AGENCE COMMUNAUTAIRE DE CONTRÔLE DES PÊCHES

(grade A*14)

COM/2005/10004

(2005/C 232 A/01)

L'Agence communautaire de contrôle des pêches a l'intention de nommer son directeur exécutif.

Les candidats doivent être ressortissants d'un des États membres de l'Union européenne.

Le directeur sera nommé par le conseil d'administration de l'Agence à partir d'une liste de candidats sélectionnés et proposés par la Commission européenne. Il sera nommé en qualité d'agent temporaire au grade A*14 conformément à l'article 2 bis du régime applicable aux autres agents des Communautés européennes pour une durée de cinq ans renouvelable pour une nouvelle période ne pouvant excéder cinq ans. L'Agence et la Commission appliquent une politique d'égalité des chances.

La description du poste, l'acte de candidature et les instructions relatives à l'envoi de l'acte de candidature peuvent être téléchargés aux adresses suivantes:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_fr.htm

ou

http://europa.eu.int/comm/fisheries

La date limite de réception des candidatures est fixée au 21 octobre 2005 (le cachet de la poste faisant foi).

---
#### § 9260.0-2 Objective.

To provide in a single part a compilation of all criminal violations relating to public lands that appear throughout title 43 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00460

- CR

CELESTINA LYNN GARCI A

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No. 16

- 12

- 29732

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered t his cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 13, 2018
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Wind Cave
National ParkSouth Dakota
118 STAT. 3972 PUBLIC LAW 108–490—DEC. 23, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5204:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Oct. 6, considered and passed House.

Dec. 8, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–490

108th Congress

An Act

To amend section 340E of the Public Health Service Act (relating to children’s

hospitals) to modify provisions regarding the determination of the amount of

payments for indirect expenses associated with operating approved graduate medical residency training programs.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISREGARD OF NEWBORN BASSINETS IN CALCULATING

CASE MIX FOR RECEIPT BY CHILDREN’S HOSPITALS OF

FUNDING FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 340E(d) of the Public Health Service

Act (42 U.S.C. 256e(d)) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘related to’’ and inserting

‘‘associated with’’; and

(2) in paragraph (2)(A)—

(A) by inserting ‘‘ratio of the’’ after ‘‘hospitals and

the’’; and

(B) by inserting at the end before the semicolon ‘‘to

beds (but excluding beds or bassinets assigned to healthy

newborn infants)’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection

(a) shall apply to payments for periods beginning with fiscal year

2005.

Approved December 23, 2004.

42 USC 256e

note.

Dec. 23, 2004

[H.R. 5204]