alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11
ENTREMED, INC.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months Ended             Six Months Ended
                                                 June 30,                       June 30,

                                           1997          1996(1)          1997           1996(1)
                                      ------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>               <C>            <C>             <C>
Weighted average common
and common equivalent shares
outstanding during the period          12,134,490       7,696,696       2,089,347       7,068,703

Effect of common stock issued and
stock options and warrants granted
subsequent to April 12,1995
computed in accordance with the
treasury stock method as required
by the SEC (2)                                             --                             425,663
                                     ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
Total common and common
equivalent shares
                                       12,134,490       7,696,696      12,089,347       7,494,366
                                     ============    ============    ============    ============

Net loss                             $ (1,180,493)   $   (464,938)   $ (2,604,000)   $ (2,140,345)
                                     ============    ============    ============    ============

Net loss per share                   $      (0.10)   $      (0.06)   $      (0.22)   $      (0.29)
                                     ============    ============    ============    ============


</TABLE>


(1) All share information has been adjusted to reflect a two-for-three reverse
stock split.

(2) Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 83, Common and Preferred Stock issued and stock options and warrants grants
at prices below the initial public offering price of $15.00 per share during
the 12-month period immediately preceding the initial filing date of the
Company's Registration Statement for its initial public offering have been
included as outstanding for all periods presented using the treasury stock
method.
#### Wynn & Robinson *v.*Jones.

Beck, J.

1. Where on the trial of a claim ease the claimant introduced, in connection with other evidence to support her contention that she was the owner of the property levied upon, a mortgage given by the defendant in execution to his vendor for the purchase-money of a part of the property, which mortgage contained a clause retaining title in the vendor, and which had been transferred to the claimant, it was error for the court to charge the jury as follows: “In considering the question of fraud you look to the daté of the papers; if the mortgage was transferred to the claimant prior to the date of the execution, the claimant would have a prior lien, and the property would not be subject;” although the mortgage and the transfer thereof were of an older date than the judgment upon which the execution was based, there being some evidence from which the jury might have found that the mortgage was a part of a fraudulent scheme between the defendant and the claimant to defeat the collection of the debt due plaintiff in execution; as the charge complained of had the effect of excluding such testimony from consideration by the jury.

*103September 20, 1910.

Claim. Before Judge Gilbert. Muscogee superior court. May 30, 1909.

*S. T. Pinkston,*for plaintiffs. *W. PL. McQrory,*contra.

2. No error is made to appear in the exceptions to the other rulings of the court.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0645

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. 

JUNE LEE WOLVERINE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 27, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 21 2022

03/21/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0645
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jovel Leonardo LINO-MEJIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40405.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jovel Leonardo Lino-Mejia appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien found in the United States after deportation subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction. The district court sentenced Lino-Mejia to 63 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. We need not decide the applicability of the *269waiver in this case because the only issue that Lino-Mejia raises is foreclosed.

Lino-Mejia challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Lino-Mejia’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Lino-Mejia contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert, denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Lino-Mejia properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.%
### §7423. Repayments to officers or employees

The Secretary, subject to regulations prescribed by the Secretary, is authorized to repay—

#### (1) Collections recovered

To any officer or employee of the United States the full amount of such sums of money as may be recovered against him in any court, for any internal revenue taxes collected by him, with the cost and expense of suit; also

#### (2) Damages and costs

All damages and costs recovered against any officer or employee of the United States in any suit brought against him by reason of anything done in the due performance of his official duty under this title.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 877; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" in provisions preceding par. (1).
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.1008 Discovery.

Discovery will not be permitted in SBA VOSB or SDVOSB status protest proceedings.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-80985-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

KAWA ORTHODONTICS LLP, a Florida

limited liability partnership, individually and

as the representative of a class of similarly

situated persons,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

MEDXCOM LLC, a Delaware limited

liability company, and GIFFEN

SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware

corporation,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER APPROVING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (the 

“Notice”) [DE 8], filed herein on September 3, 2020. The Court has carefully reviewed the 

Notice and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Notice [DE 8] is hereby APPROVED. 

2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, and class claims are dismissed without 

prejudice. 

3. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY any pending motions as moot. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida on 

this 3rd day of September, 2020.

Case 9:20-cv-80985-WPD Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 1 of 2
Copies furnished to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-80985-WPD Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 4.406 Intervention; amicus curiae. ( a ) A person who wishes to intervene in an appeal must file a motion to intervene within 30 days after the person knew or should have known that the decision had been appealed to the Board.
( b ) A motion to intervene must set forth the basis for the proposed intervention, including: ( 1 ) Whether the person had a right to appeal the decision under § 4.410 or would be adversely affected if the Board reversed, vacated, set aside, or modified the decision; and
( 2 ) How and when the person learned of the appeal.
( c ) The Board may: ( 1 ) Grant the motion to intervene;
( 2 ) Deny the motion to intervene for good cause, e.g., where granting it would disadvantage the rights of the existing parties or unduly delay adjudication of the appeal; or
( 3 ) Grant the motion to intervene but limit the person's participation in the appeal.
( d ) A person may file a motion at any time to file a brief as an amicus curiae. ( 1 ) The motion must state the person's interest in the appeal and how its brief will be relevant to the issues involved.
( 2 ) The Board may grant or deny the motion in its discretion. The Board may also allow a person to file a brief as amicus curiae if it denies the person's motion to intervene.
( e ) A person granted full or limited intervenor status is a party to the appeal, while an amicus curiae is not. A person granted amicus curiae status must serve its brief on the parties to the appeal.
[75 FR 64665, Oct. 20, 2010]
#### § 123.8 Does SBA charge any fees for obtaining a disaster loan?

SBA does not charge points, closing, or servicing fees on any disaster loan authorized under Section 7(b). You will be responsible for payment of any closing costs owed to third parties on these loans, such as recording fees and title insurance premiums. If your loan is made under Section 7(b) in participation with a financial institution, SBA will charge a guarantee fee to the financial institution, which then may recover the guarantee fee from you. SBA does not charge a guarantee fee for an IDAP loan made under Section 42.

[75 FR 60598, Oct. 1, 2010]
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Turf Management
<PAGE>

                                    Exhibit 4

                           Specimen Stock Certificate

Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc.
Whiteville, North Carolina

Incorporated under the laws of the state of North Carolina.

This Certifies that ____________ is the owner of ____________ shares of the
common stock without par value of Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. transferable on the
books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized
attorney on surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is
not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and
Registrar.

Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

Dated:


-------------------------------                 -------------------------------
Secretary                                       Chairman of the Board

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc.

KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, MUTILATED OR
DESTROYED, THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO
THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE.

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations.

TEN COM - as tenants in common
TEN ENT - as tenants in the entireties
JT TEN  - as joint tenants with right of survivorship
          and not as tenants in common

UGMA/UTMA -- ________ Custodian _________
              (Cust)             (Minor)
under the Uniform Gifts/Transfers to Minors Act ____________
                                                   (State)

For Value Received, _______ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto ___________
Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint ___________ Attorney to transfer the said
stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.

Dated _____________

Signature(s) Guaranteed: _________________
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


World War II Memorial
District of Columbia


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Be A Junior Ranger
 Marisalinc**National Mall and Memorial Parks Junior Ranger Program**
National Mall and Memorial Parks has several Junior Ranger activities for the adventurous young visitors to earn badges. Check out the Be a Junior Ranger Page.
 Last updated: April 18, 2017
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 1100 Ohio Drive SW
Washington,
DC
20242
 Phone: 202-426-6841 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### Seamen’s Bank for Savings in the City of New York v. Arthur Smadbeck, as Executor of August Heckscher, Deceased.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
Gibbons 

Saitta 

J. 

Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Rubio v. State, 124 Nev. 1032, 

1039-40, 194 P.3d 1224, 1228-29 (2008). Here, the district court conducted 

a hearing on the motion and heard arguments from counsel; however, as 

the district court noted, Garcia "called no witnesses and submitted no 

affidavits." Garcia was not present at the hearing due to his apparent 

deportation and his former defense counsel was not called to testify. As a 

result, the district court determined that Garcia "failed to meet his burden 

of showing that his defense counsel was ineffective" and denied the 

motion. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by 

denying Garcia's motion to withdraw his guilty plea, see Bryant v. State, 

102 Nev. 268, 272, 721 P.2d 364, 368 (1986), and we 

ORDER the judgnyeritAf the district court AFFIRMED. 

cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge 

Ian E. Silverberg 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(,0) 1947A 

2 

littiftaf
#### § 4750.3-4 Approval or disapproval of applications.

If an application is approved, the authorized officer shall offer the individual an opportunity to select the appropriate number, sex, age and species of animals from those available. If the authorized officer disapproves an application for private maintenance because the applicant lacks adequate facilities or transport, the individual may correct the shortcoming and file a new application.
Exhibit 99.1



                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Craig Overlander, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
          Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of Trust Certificates (TRUCs), Series 2001-2 Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
          pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these
          reports is included in these reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          depositor and the trustee under the trust agreement and based upon
          my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
          agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and
          the trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that
          agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as trustee, and its officers and agents.

                                    By:  /s/ Craig M. Overlander
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Craig M. Overlander
                                    Title: Chief Executive Officer/President,
                                    Bear Stearns Depositor Inc.
                                    Date:  March 30, 2006
### §5357. Premises

Bonded wine cellar premises, including noncontiguous portions thereof, shall be so located, constructed, and equipped, as to afford adequate protection to the revenue, as regulations prescribed by the Secretary may provide.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1379; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5357, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 664, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
#### Frank Allenza, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
EXHIBIT 23 

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 47-24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/02/2021 Page 1 of 3
From: Regan, Christopher <cregan@buckleyfirm.com> 

Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 3:49 PM 

To: 'braunsteinj@sec.gov' <braunsteinj@sec.gov>; Petrilla, Antony <PetrillaA@SEC.GOV> 

Cc: greenbergb@gtlaw.com; Viswanatha, Veena <vviswanatha@buckleyfirm.com> 

Subject: RE: Search Terms for OIG database 

Josh, 

We are again disappointed that you will not schedule any calls to discuss these issues and disagree with your view of 

what Judge Louis ordered. We do not think the burden of running the search terms we provided (including Apple) 

would be significant in any way and the results would be informative to us and the Judge. Our recollection is that if the 

number of hits on a proposed search term was similar to the results from running the ordered searches, the Judge might 

order the SEC to produce those documents. We are just proposing what we think is an efficient way to focus on the 

documents most relevant in a database we know almost nothing about. Nonetheless, if you are only willing to run the 

term convertible and two others, please use trader and factors. If you reconsider your position, please let me 

know. Thanks. 

Chris 

Christopher F. Regan 

Partner 

Buckley LLP 

2001 M Street NW 

Suite 500 

Washington, DC 20036 

T 202.349.7970 

M 202.255.2943 

cregan@bucklevfirm.com 

www.bucklevfirm.com 

1 

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 47-24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/02/2021 Page 2 of 3
From: Regan, Christopher 

Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 1:12 PM 

To: 'braunsteinj@sec.gov' <braunsteinj@sec.gov>; Petrilla, Antony <PetrillaA@SEC.GOV>

Cc: greenbergb@gtlaw.com; Viswanatha, Veena <vviswanathaPbucklevfirm.com>

Subject: Search Terms for OIG database 

Josh, 

We write to follow up on the hearing before Judge Louis last Friday. We look forward to learning how many documents 

in the Office of Interpretation and Guidance's database hit on the terms "Apple" and "convertible". We also look 

forward to confirmation of whether it is possible to search for the term "convertible note," or whether you can only 

search for one word at a time. 

We also ask that you run the below search terms in the database and let us know how many documents hit on each of 

these terms. We understand that Judge Louis has ordered the SEC at this time to produce documents that hit on two 

additional terms, and we ask that you provide this information so that we can identify the two additional terms. 

Trader 

Factors 

Microcap 

Statute 

Discount 

Spread 

144 

Hold 

Advertise 

Business 

Penny 

Invest 

Investment 

Conference 

Please IPt us know if you would like to discuss. Thanks. 

Chris 

Christopher F. Regan 

Partner 

Buckley LLP 

2001 M Street NW 

Suite 500 

Washington, DC 20036 

T 202.349.7970 

M 202.255.2943 

cregan@buckleyfirm.com 

www.bucklevfirm.com 

2 

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 47-24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/02/2021 Page 3 of 3
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.

Leslie C. Abbott

Senior Attorney

1901 L Street, N.W. – Suite 640

Washington, D.C. 20036

(202) 263-6285

(202) 263-6291 Fax

Leslie.abbott@wnco.com

_______________________________________________________________________________

May 31, 2012

Via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of AirTran Airways for Renewal of Exemption 

Authority (Dominican Republic); Docket OST-2010-0158

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that AirTran Airways (“AirTran”) has polled all carriers on 

the service list attached to the above-referenced Application, and all carriers responded 

that they have no objections. Accordingly, AirTran requests that the exemption authority 

renewal specified in the Application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________

Leslie C. Abbott

cc: Susan Kurland, DOT

Paul Gretch, DOT

 Brian Hedberg, DOT

Brett Kruger, DOT

All parties on the Service List