alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAviation safety and automation technology for subsonic transportsDiscussed here are aviation safety human factors and air traffic control (ATC) automation research conducted at the NASA Ames Research Center. Research results are given in the areas of flight deck and ATC automations, displays and warning systems, crew coordination, and crew fatigue and jet lag. Accident investigation and an incident reporting system that is used to guide the human factors research is discussed. A design philosophy for human-centered automation is given, along with an evaluation of automation on advanced technology transports. Intelligent error tolerant systems such as electronic checklists are discussed along with design guidelines for reducing procedure errors. The data on evaluation of Crew Resource Management (CRM) training indicates highly significant positive changes in appropriate flight deck behavior and more effective use of available resources for crew members receiving the training.Document ID19910007696Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsAlbers, James A.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103831NAS 1.15:103831A-91039Meeting InformationMeeting: 1991 AIAA International Aerospace Conference and Engineering ShowLocation: Los Angeles, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: February 13, 1991Accession Number91N17009Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-64-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007696.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §2252. Notice

Prior to the hearing of a habeas corpus proceeding in behalf of a person in custody of State officers or by virtue of State laws notice shall be served on the attorney general or other appropriate officer of such State as the justice or judge at the time of issuing the writ shall direct.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 967.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §462 (R.S. §762).

Section 462 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was limited to alien prisoners described in section 453 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. The revised section extends to all cases of all prisoners under State custody or authority, leaving it to the justice or judge to prescribe the notice to State officers, to specify the officer served, and to satisfy himself that such notice has been given.

Provision for making due proof of such service was omitted as unnecessary. The sheriff's or marshal's return is sufficient.

Changes were made in phraseology.
#### AUWERTER, Appellant, v. COMMON SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 74, Tripp County, et al, Respondents.

(174 N. W. 786.)

(File No. 5552.

Opinion filed March 18, 1924.)

Appeal and *Error*— Briefs—Court Rules — Judgment Affirmed Where Appeal Abandoned, by Default in Filing Briefs.

Where no brief was filed by appellant within the time as extended for filing appellant’s brief, and no other action of any kind was taken in prosecuting appeal or complying with the Supreme Court rules, the appeal will be deemed abandoned, and the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tripp County; Hon. John G. Bartinb, Judge.

Action by E. K. Auwerter against the Common School District Board of School Districts No. 74, Tripp County, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*M. W. Bauer,*of Colome, and *W. J. Hooper,*of Gregory, for Appellant. .

*P. A. Hosford,*of Winner, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this action was perfected on the 15th day of October, 1923. Thereafter, and on the 14th day of December, 1923, a stipulation was entered into by counsel for appellant and respondent extending the time within which appellant might file his brief to the 16th day of January, 1924. Such brief has not been filed yet, nor has' any other action of any kind or character been taken in thé prosecution of said appeal, or to comply with the rules of this court within the time therein prescribed. Therefore, the appeal is deemed to have been abandoned by appellant, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 197 N. W. 786. See, Headnote, American Key-Numbered Digest, Appeal and error, Key-No. 773 (4), 3 C. J. See. 1607, 4 C. J. Sec. 2437.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Picnic in the park

View details: With dozens of independent eateries at various price points, the Eastern Market is a popular lunch spot. Dine in at a local deli or grab something to go from a food truck. For some grassy, shaded spaces to site, walk, to nearby Tolan Playfield at Chrysler Drive and Mack Avenue, or Dues Playfield at DuBois Street and Antietam Avenue. 

Activity FeeYes

## ** Tags

            -  arts 
            -  arts and culture 
            -  mural 
            -  murals 
            -  discover our shared heritage travel itineraries 
            -  detroit 
            -  michigan 
            -  michigan history 

## ** Tags

        -  arts 
        -  arts and culture 
        -  mural 
        -  murals 
        -  discover our shared heritage travel itineraries 
        -  detroit 
        -  michigan 
        -  michigan history 

Last updated: July 27, 2020

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4994 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4994

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Board of Governors of 
the Federal Reserve System from discontinuing Federal Reserve notes if 
   a central bank digital currency is issued, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2022

 Mr. Lankford introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Board of Governors of 
the Federal Reserve System from discontinuing Federal Reserve notes if 
   a central bank digital currency is issued, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Digital Dollar Act''.

SEC. 2. CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY.

    (a) Federal Reserve Notes.--Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act 
is amended by adding after the 17th undesignated paragraph (12 U.S.C. 
467) the following:
            ``The Board of Governors may not discontinue issuing 
        Federal Reserve notes if a central bank digital currency is 
        issued.''.
    (b) Coins.--Section 5112 of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(aa) Central Bank Digital Currency.--The Secretary of the 
Treasury may not discontinue minting and issuing coins under this 
section if a central bank digital currency is issued.''.
    (c) Not Legal Tender.--No central bank digital currency shall be 
considered legal tender under section 5103 of title 31, United States 
Code.
                                 <all>
```
### §908. Reduction of credit for participation in or cooperation with an international boycott

#### (a) In general

If a person, or a member of a controlled group (within the meaning of section 993(a)(3)) which includes such person, participates in or cooperates with an international boycott during the taxable year (within the meaning of section 999(b)), the amount of the credit allowable under section 901 to such person, or under section 960 to United States shareholders of such person, for foreign taxes paid during the taxable year shall be reduced by an amount equal to the product of—

(1) the amount of the credit which, but for this section, would be allowed under section 901 for the taxable year, multiplied by

(2) the international boycott factor (determined under section 999).

#### (b) Application with sections 275(a)(4) and 78

Section 275(a)(4) and section 78 shall not apply to any amount of taxes denied credit under subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1061(a), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1649; amended Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §14301(c)(28), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2224.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–97 struck out "902 or" after "or under section" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2017 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–97 applicable to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, and to taxable years of United States shareholders in which or with which such taxable years of foreign corporations end, see section 14301(d) of Pub. L. 115–97, set out as a note under section 78 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1066(a), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1654, provided that:

"(1) General rule.—The amendments made by this part (other than by section 1065) [enacting this section and section 999 of this title and amending sections 952 and 995 of this title] apply to participation in or cooperation with an international boycott more than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 4, 1976].

"(2) Existing contracts.—In the case of operations which constitute participation in or cooperation with an international boycott and which are carried out in accordance with the terms of a binding contract entered into before September 2, 1976, the amendments made by this part (other than by section 1065) apply to such participation or cooperation after December 31, 1977."
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 

I, Robert O. Carr, certify that: 

1. I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Actrules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

b. [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238]; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

Date: March 9, 2007
amar_101g





 







Exhibit 10.1(g)


 



AMENDMENT NO. 1



TO



EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS
AMENDMENT NO. 1 is made by and between 
AMARILLO BIOSCIENCES, INC., a Texas corporation, inclusive of
any Affiliates or subsidiaries (“ABI”)
and 
STEPHEN T. CHEN, Ph.D. (“EMPLOYEE”) to
that certain Employment Agreement between the parties made
effective January 1, 2021 (“Agreement”).


 




1.

All references to
“Chairman, President, CEO, and CFO” shall be deleted
and be replaced by “Senior Scientific Advisor” for the
purposes of Employee’s employment only. For the avoidance of
doubt, the deletion of the herein references shall not constitute a
resignation or removal of any officer position that Employee may
hold now or in the future.






 




2.

Notwithstanding the
foregoing paragraph 1, Employee may serve in any capacity as an
officer of ABI as determined by ABI’s Board of Directors and
Article III of ABI’s Bylaws.






 




3.

All other terms and
conditions under the Agreement not expressly amended or modified by
this amendment shall continue in full force and
effect.






 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Agreement to
be executed on its behalf by a duly authorized officer on the day
and year first above written.


 






	
 

	

Amarillo Biosciences, Inc.

	
 

	
 

	
EMPLOYEE:

	
 


	
By:


	
/s/ John Junyong Lee

	
 

	
By:


	
/s/ 
Stephen T. Chen

	
 


	
 

	
John Junyong
Lee

	
 

	
 

	Dr.
Stephen T. Chen, Ph.D.	
 


	
 

	
Secretary                                                                                     

	
 

	
 

	



	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	



	
 


	
Date:

	
January
19, 2021   	
 

	
Date:

	
January
19, 2021   	
 






 






AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


January
19, 2021


Page
[Insert
Page Number] of 1
#### § 9212.0-6 Policy.

It is the policy of the Bureau of Land Management to take all necessary actions to protect human life, the public lands and the resources and improvements thereon through the prevention of wildfires. Wherever possible, the Bureau of Land Management's actions will complement and support State and local wildfire prevention actions.
1 COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

James H. Davis d/b/a JD Minerals, Walter

Allison Baen, Santos J. Dominguez and

Dixie L. Hester

,

Appellant s

,

v.

COG Operating, LLC, Neal Brusenhan

Properties, LP, Neal Brusenhan

Management, LLC as General Partner of

Neal Brusenhan Properties, LP, Robert L.

Neal as Trustee of the Neal Robert L.

Management Trust and Jessie Frances

Neal

,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00 205

- C V

Appeal from the

1 1 2 th Dis trict Court

of Upton C ounty, Texas

(TC# 18

- 04

- U4615

- OTH )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Appellants’ unopposed motion to direct the district clerk

to send original documents to the Court of Appeals. The motion is GRANTED. Therefore, the

Court ORDERS the district clerk to forward the original Exhibits 66 through 67B inclusive,

marked “confide ntial” and filed “under seal,” attached to Plaintiffs’ Traditional Motion for

Summary Judgment filed on November 12 , 2019

. The original exhibits are due with this Court on

or before February 2, 2021

. The Court will return the original exhibits to the District Clerk of2

Upton County, Texas, after final disposition of this appeal. The Court will keep these files under

seal pending review of this appeal.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of Jan ua ry

, 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez

, C.J., Palafo x and Alley, JJ.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionRadiation All Around Us

# Doses in Our Daily Lives

On average, Americans receive a radiation dose of about 0.62 rem (620 millirem) each year. Half of this dose comes from natural background radiation. Most of this background exposure comes from radon in the air, with smaller amounts from cosmic rays and the Earth itself. (The chart to the right shows these radiation doses in perspective.) The other half (0.31 rem or 310 mrem) comes from man-made sources of radiation, including medical, commercial, and industrial sources. In general, a yearly dose of 620 millirem from all radiation sources has not been shown to cause humans any harm.

On this page:
        - Doses from Medical Procedures
        - Radioactivity in Food
        - Personal Annual Radiation Dose Calculator

## Doses from Medical Procedures

## Radioactivity in Food

## Personal Annual Radiation Dose Calculator

We live in a radioactive world, and radiation has always been all around us as a part of our natural environment. As explained above, the annual average dose per person from all sources is about 620 mrem. To find your personal annual radiation dose, use the interactive Personal Annual Radiation Dose Calculator or this printer friendly worksheet.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 26, 2022

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Sources of Radiation
          - Uses of Radiation
          - Doses in Our Daily Lives
          - Radiation Dispersion Maps and Information
          - Personal Annual Radiation Dose Calculator

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, April 26, 2022
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Technical Assistance Request, Capintec Instruments, Inc., Request for Definition of Sealed Sourceas Used in 10 CFR 30.35

## HPPOS-311 PDR-9306250080

See the memorandum from J. E. Glenn to R. R. Bellamy dated January 30, 1991, and the memorandum from J. H. Austin to J. E. Glenn dated January 24, 1991. 

These memos concern a technical assistance request from Capintec Instruments, Inc., regarding the definition of sealed sources as used in 10 CFR 30.35 and specifically whether sealed vials manufactured by Capintec meet the requirements (see enclosures).

The definition of a sealed source in 10 CFR 30.4 requires the capsule to be designed to prevent contact with and dispersion of the radioactive material under the conditions of use for which it was designed. Certain low energy and low activity calibration and reference sources have been confined by using glass vials for numerous years. These vials are typically used in conjunction with expensive counting equipment and have demonstrated a good operational history.

The ampoule in question is flame sealed to prevent leakage or escape of its contents and therefore can be considered to be a sealed source. This conclusion is consistent with past NRC practice. The radionuclide content of the sources are small, and the impact on decommissioning of the facility if one or a few were to fail is minor.

**Regulatory references:** 10 CFR 30.4, 10 CFR 30.35

**Subject codes:** 11.2

**Applicability:** Byproduct Material

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 30, 2017