alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2263. Filing of habeas corpus application; time requirements; tolling rules

(a) Any application under this chapter for habeas corpus relief under section 2254 must be filed in the appropriate district court not later than 180 days after final State court affirmance of the conviction and sentence on direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review.

(b) The time requirements established by subsection (a) shall be tolled—

(1) from the date that a petition for certiorari is filed in the Supreme Court until the date of final disposition of the petition if a State prisoner files the petition to secure review by the Supreme Court of the affirmance of a capital sentence on direct review by the court of last resort of the State or other final State court decision on direct review;

(2) from the date on which the first petition for post-conviction review or other collateral relief is filed until the final State court disposition of such petition; and

(3) during an additional period not to exceed 30 days, if—

(A) a motion for an extension of time is filed in the Federal district court that would have jurisdiction over the case upon the filing of a habeas corpus application under section 2254; and

(B) a showing of good cause is made for the failure to file the habeas corpus application within the time period established by this section.

(Added Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §107(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1223.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to cases pending on or after Apr. 24, 1996, see section 107(c) of Pub. L. 104–132, set out as a note under section 2261 of this title.
453 P.2d 220

#### General Roger HARRISON, Petitioner, v. “Red” DOW, Sheriff of Bernalillo County, New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 8829.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

April 29, 1969.

NOBLE, Chief Justice, and MOISE, COMPTON and TACKETT, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the Writ of Habeas Corpus heretofore issued herein on April 21, 1969, be and the same is hereby quashed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dannie MURPHY, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-4215.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 9, 2006.

Decided: March 3, 2006.

Andrew R. Mackenzie, Barrett Mackenzie, L.L.C., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Dannie Murphy appeals his conviction and sentence imposed after he pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base or crack cocaine and 5 kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A), 846 (2000). On appeal, Murphy’s counsel filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there were no meritorious issues, but raising the issue of whether the district court erred in using a prior conviction to increase the mandatory statutory minimum sentence under § 841(b)(1)(A). Murphy filed a pro se supplemental brief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

The prior predicate conviction for distribution of crack cocaine, although occurring during the course of an 18-year long conspiracy, was properly used to enhance the mandatory statutory minimum sentence. *United States v. Martino,*294 F.3d 346, 350-51 (2d Cir.2002); *United States v. Hughes,*924 F.2d 1354, 1361-62 (6th Cir. 1991).

Murphy contends counsel was ineffective on a number of counts. The proper proceeding in which to pursue an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is not a direct appeal but a collateral proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). *United States v. DeFusco,*949 F.2d 114, 120 (4th Cir.1991). We will entertain such a claim on direct appeal only if it “conclusively appears” from the record that the defendant’s counsel was ineffective. *United States v. Russell,*221 F.3d 615, 619 n. 5 (4th Cir.2000). Because the record is incomplete in this regard, the claim will not be reviewed.

As required by *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Murphy’s convictions and sentence. This court requires counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client *776requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### Mason-Seaman Transportation Company, Appellant, v. John Purroy Mitchel, as Mayor of the City of New York, and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the City of New York, Appellant-Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Required for the Opening and Extending of East River Drive, and Approaches Thereto, in the Borough of Manhattan. Guy Cary et al., as Ancillary Executors of Robert W. Goelet, et al., Respondents-Appellants; George V. R. J. Innes-Ker, Respondent.

Supplemental and amended final decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent, George Victor Robert John Innes-Ker, Duke of Roxburghe, against the City of New York. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 17]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ017.109]

[[Page 118 STAT. 339]]

Public Law 109-17
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 to reauthorize State 
        mediation programs. <<NOTE: June 29, 2005 -  [S. 643]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF STATE MEDIATION PROGRAMS.

    Section 506 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 5106) 
is amended by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2010''.

    Approved June 29, 2005.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 643:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):
            Apr. 21, considered and passed Senate.
            June 13, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
#### Salvatore Amanna, Appellant, v. The Village of Mount Kisco, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J.- Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.952 Fiscal agent.

SBA shall appoint a Fiscal Agent to assess the financial markets, minimize the cost of sales, arrange for the production of the Offering Circular, Debenture Certificates, and other required documents, and monitor the performance of the Trustee and the underwriters.
### §363. Court of Federal Claims, Court of International Trade, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

The United States Court of Federal Claims, the Court of International Trade, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall each prescribe rules, consistent with the provisions of this chapter, establishing procedures for the filing of complaints with respect to the conduct of any judge of such court and for the investigation and resolution of such complaints. In investigating and taking action with respect to any such complaint, each such court shall have the powers granted to a judicial council under this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11042(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1854.)
choose a page What is LIDAR? http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/lidar.html 1 of 4 10/1/2015 2:09 PMWhat is LIDAR? http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/lidar.html 2 of 4 10/1/2015 2:09 PM→ What is LIDAR? http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/lidar.html 3 of 4 10/1/2015 2:09 PMWhat is LIDAR? http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/lidar.html 4 of 4 10/1/2015 2:09 PM
#### In the Matter of Samuel Rose.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
§ 123.102 What circumstances would justify my relocating? SBA may approve a loan if you intend to relocate outside the business area in which the disaster has occurred if your relocation is caused by such special or unusual circumstances as: ( a ) Demonstrable risk that the business area will suffer future disasters;
( b ) A change in employment status (such as loss of job, transfer, lack of adequate job opportunities within the business area or scheduled retirement within 18 months after the disaster occurs);
( c ) Medical reasons; or
( d ) Special family considerations which necessitate a move outside of the business area.
# OUTPUT

Schedule B-3BPage &P of &N
### §1454. Patent, plant variety protection, and copyright cases

(a) In General.—A civil action in which any party asserts a claim for relief arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, plant variety protection, or copyrights may be removed to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where the action is pending.

(b) Special Rules.—The removal of an action under this section shall be made in accordance with section 1446, except that if the removal is based solely on this section—

(1) the action may be removed by any party; and

(2) the time limitations contained in section 1446(b) may be extended at any time for cause shown.

(c) Clarification of Jurisdiction in Certain Cases.—The court to which a civil action is removed under this section is not precluded from hearing and determining any claim in the civil action because the State court from which the civil action is removed did not have jurisdiction over that claim.

(d) Remand.—If a civil action is removed solely under this section, the district court—

(1) shall remand all claims that are neither a basis for removal under subsection (a) nor within the original or supplemental jurisdiction of the district court under any Act of Congress; and

(2) may, under the circumstances specified in section 1367(c), remand any claims within the supplemental jurisdiction of the district court under section 1367.

(Added Pub. L. 112–29, §19(c)(1), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 332.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to any civil action commenced on or after Sept. 16, 2011, see section 19(e) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment note under section 1295 of this title.
HomeAbout NRCCareer OpportunitiesOpportunitiesStudents

# Frequently Asked Questions About the Nuclear Regulator Apprenticeship Network Program

On this page:
        - How does the program work?
        - How do I qualify?
        - At what pay level will I be hired?
        - Where will I work?
        - How do I apply?

Index to All Frequently Asked Questions Pages

**How does the program work?**

The Nuclear Regulator Apprenticeship Network (NRAN) is a paid, full-time 18-month training program for outstanding engineers and scientists from across the nation who wish to start an advancement-oriented career with the NRC. As an employee participating in the NRAN, you will be part of a cohort of recent college graduates and receive support of both mentors and leaders to guide your development and NRC career path. The program is designed to develop well-rounded regulators by focusing on skill development in multiple areas across the agency. Initial training will cover regulatory and technical fundamentals as well as soft skills. After successful completion of the training the candidate will participate in 3-4 apprenticeships to gain a variety of skills and experiences. The 2024 cohort is in process of being filled, and recruitment for the 2026 cohort will begin in the fall of 2025.

**How do I qualify?**

You should have both superior academic standing and a high potential for achievement in challenging professional assignments, and be a recent graduate with a bachelor's, master's, or doctoral degree in engineering, physical science or health physics.

NRC generally assesses applicants on the following factors:
        - Grade point average of 2.95 or higher based on a 4.0 scale
        - Honors and awards received
        - Extracurricular or work-related activities
        - Interpersonal skills (written/verbal communication, listening, presentation, etc.)
        - Candidate interviews

Other than academic qualifications, an applicant must:
        - Possess U.S. citizenship;
        - Pass mandatory pre-employment drug screening;
        - Ability to pass a background investigation leading to a clearance.

**At what pay level will I be hired?**

As a successful program participant, you may be promoted each year and upon completion of the two years you will be placed in a career ladder position that will take you to the grade 13. Please see the estimated Nuclear Regulator Apprenticeship Network Pay Progression table.

**Where will I work?**

As part of the NRAN cohort, you will begin employment at our Headquarters location in Rockville, MD just outside of Washington, D.C., and you will participate in both technical and personal development training at both our Headquarters and Technical Training Center locations.

**How do I apply?**

For more information, see our Contact Us About Employment page and select "Apprenticeship Network" from the dropdown list.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, January 17, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.225 The record. ( a ) *Contents.* The record of a case before OHA will consist of all pleadings, motions, and other non-evidentiary submissions, all admitted evidence, all orders and decisions, and any transcripts of proceedings in the case.
( b ) *Closure.* The Judge will set the date upon which the pre-decisional record of the case will be closed, and after which no additional evidence or argument will be accepted.
[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 75 FR 47442, Aug. 6, 2010]
#### Lena Kaufman, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. Abraham C. Hopper, Respondent.

Motions denied, without costs. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE DI STRI CT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) SCOTT J . BRODI E, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-0544 ( PL F) ) UNI TED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEAL TH ) AND HU MAN SERVI CES, et al. , ) ) Def endants. ) __________________________________________)

ORDER For the re asons g iven in the Opinion issued this same day , it is hereby ORDERED that [2] plaintiff’s motion for a pr eliminary injunction is DENI ED; and it is FURTHE R ORDERED that the parties sha ll file a joint report proposing an expedited schedule f

or the filingof the a dminist rative r ecor d and the br iefing of dispositive motions on or before J une 11, 2010.

SO ORDERED. /s/________________________ PAUL L . FRI EDMAN United States District Court DATE: June 4, 2010
### §63. Repealed. June 19, 1934, ch. 657, §3, 48 Stat. 1116

Section, acts Oct. 28, 1919, ch. 85, title III, §20, 41 Stat. 322; July 5, 1932, ch. 428, 47 Stat. 579, made it unlawful to introduce into Canal Zone, or to manufacture, sell, transport, or possess within Canal Zone, any intoxicating liquors, except for sacramental, scientific, or medicinal purposes.
Exhibit 32.2

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TransAlta Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Burden, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/   Brett Gellner              |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| Brett   Gellner                  |
| Chief   Financial Officer        |
|                             |
| Dated:   February 24, 2011. |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Document

    Exhibit 10.17
    







January 29, 2021


Ken Canestrari
The TJX Companies, Inc.
770 Cochituate Road
Framingham, MA 01701


Re:    Letter Agreement


Dear Mr. Canestrari,


    Reference is made to the employment agreement between you and The TJX Companies, Inc. (“TJX” or “Company”) dated February 2, 2018, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”).  Subject to earlier termination as provided therein, your employment with TJX under the Employment Agreement will continue until January 30, 2021.  By entering into this letter agreement with TJX (the “Letter Agreement”), you agree to extend your employment with TJX under the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement, effective as of the date hereof, with the following modifications:
1.Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the third-to-last sentence thereof with the following:
“Subject to earlier termination as provided herein, Executive’s employment hereunder shall continue on the terms provided herein until February 3, 2024 (the ‘End Date’).”
2.The last sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“The rate at which Executive’s Base Salary shall be paid shall be $900,000 per year or such other rate (not less than $900,000 per year) as the Committee may determine after Committee review not less frequently than annually.”
Except as otherwise amended by this Letter Agreement, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.  You acknowledge and agree that your employment with TJX under the Employment Agreement shall continue from and after the date hereof in accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended by this Letter Agreement. 


If you agree with the foregoing, please so indicate by signing the enclosed copy of this Letter
Agreement in the space indicated below and returning it to the Company, whereupon this Letter
Agreement will take effect as of the date hereof.  This Letter Agreement shall constitute an agreement under seal.


[Signature Page Follows]








        THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.
By:   /s/ Ernie Herrman                                
Name: Ernie Herrman
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President








EXECUTIVE:
   /s/ Kenneth Canestrari            1/29/2021   
Name: Ken Canestrari




    




    
    -2-
§ 123.101 When am I not eligible for a home disaster loan? You are not eligible for a home disaster loan if: ( a ) You have been convicted, during the past year, of a felony during and in connection with a riot or civil disorder or other declared disaster;
( b ) You acquired voluntarily more than a 50 percent ownership interest in the damaged property after the disaster, and no contract of sale existed at the time of the disaster;
( c ) Your damaged property can be repaired or replaced with the proceeds of insurance, gifts or other compensation, including condemnation awards (with one exception), these amounts must either be deducted from the amount of the claimed losses or, if received after SBA has approved and disbursed a loan, must be paid to SBA as principal payments on your loan. You must notify SBA of any such recoveries collected after receiving an SBA disaster loan. The one exception applies to amounts received under the Individuals and Household Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency solely to meet an emergency need pending processing of an SBA loan. In such an event, you must repay the financial assistance with SBA loan proceeds if it was used for purposes also eligible for an SBA loan;
( d ) SBA determines that you assumed the risk (for example, by not maintaining flood insurance as required by an earlier SBA disaster loan when the current loss is also due to flood);
( e ) Your damaged property is a secondary home (although if you rented the property out before the disaster and the property would not constitute a “residence” under the provisions of Section 280A of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 280A), you may be eligible for a physical disaster business loan);
( f ) Your damaged property is the type of vehicle normally used for recreational purposes, such as motorhomes, aircraft, and boats;
( g ) Your damaged property consists of cash or securities;
( h ) The replacement value of your damaged personal property is extraordinarily high and not easily verified, such as the value of antiques, artworks, or hobby collections;
( i ) You or other principal owners of the damaged property are currently incarcerated, serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed upon adjudication of guilty;
( j ) Your only interest in the damaged property is in the form of a security interest, mortgage, or deed of trust;
( k ) The damaged building, including contents, was newly constructed or substantially improved on or after February 9, 1989, and (without a significant business justification) is located seaward of mean high tide or entirely in or over water; or
( l ) You voluntarily decide to relocate outside the business area in which the disaster has occurred, and there are no special or unusual circumstances leading to your decision (business area means the municipality which provides general governmental services to your damaged home or, if not located in a municipality, the county or equivalent political entity in which your damaged home is located).
[61 FR 3304, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 64519, Oct. 21, 2002; 89 FR 34102, Apr. 30, 2024]