alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 3G 

LICENSING S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A.,

Plaintiffs

§

§

§

§

v.

HMD AMERICA, INC., and HMD GLOBAL 

OY,

§

§

§

§

§

NO. 1:20-CV-22051-JEM

Defendants. §

AGREED MOTION TO SET RESPONSE DEADLINE

Defendants HMD America, Inc. and HMD Global Oy hereby move the Court, with the 

agreement of Plaintiffs, to set the deadline to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint

to October 2, 2020, and in support of said motion state as follows:

On May 15, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a complaint for patent infringement against Defendants 

HMD America, Inc. and HMD Global Oy. (D.I. 1.) On May 18, 2020, summons were issued 

against both Defendants. (D.I. 3) 

On July 13, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a “proof of service” alleging that the Summons and 

Complaint in this matter were served upon HMD Global Oy in Finland “pursuant to Article 10(a) 

of the Hague Convention via Federal Express.” (D.I. 6 at 2.) 

HMD Global Oy disagrees that it has been served pursuant to the Hague Convention in this 

matter. No service on HMD America, Inc. has been alleged or has occurred. Nevertheless, 

Defendants HMD Global Oy and HMD America, Inc. have agreed that they will waive service of 

the summons and complaint upon receiving 60 additional days to move, answer, or otherwise 

respond beyond the deadline in Plaintiffs’ purported proof of service.

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

The parties submit that there is good cause for such a deadline because HMD Global Oy is 

a foreign corporation and service has not yet been attempted on HMD America, Inc. 

WHEREFORE, Defendants HMD America, Inc. and HMD Global Oy respectfully move 

the Court, with the agreement of Plaintiffs, to set the deadline for Defendants HMD America, Inc. 

and HMD Global Oy to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter to 

Friday, October 2, 2020. Defendants shall reserve all defenses and objections to the lawsuit, the 

court’s jurisdiction, and the venue of the action.

Dated: August 6, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Elizabeth Banzhoff (Manno)

PERKINS COIE LLP 

Elizabeth Banzhoff (Manno) (Fl. Bar #67963)

1900 Sixteenth Street

Suite 1400

Denver, Colorado 80202-5255

T: +1.303.291.2300

F: +1.303.291.2400

EManno@perkinscoie.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS HMD 

AMERICA, INC. AND HMD GLOBAL OY

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are

being served with a copy of this document on August 6, 2020.

/s/ Elizabeth Banzhoff (Manno)

Elizabeth Banzhoff (Manno)

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2020 Page 2 of 2
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**530 KA 15-01733** 
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANDREW K. PEYATT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THOMAS J. EOANNOU, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Farkas, J.), rendered April 22, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree and attempted course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.75 [1] [a]) and attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree (§§ 110.00, 130.50 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence ( see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737). We note, however, that both the certificate of conviction and the uniform sentence and commitment form incorrectly recite that defendant was convicted of criminal sexual act in the first degree rather than an attempt to commit that crime. The certificate of conviction and the sentence and commitment form must therefore be amended to correct that clerical error ( see People v Oberdorf , 136 AD3d 1291, 1292-1293).

Entered: June 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 32(i)**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly report of Tayco Developments, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2005 to be filed with Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas P. Taylor, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

|Date: April 13, 2005 | By: | /s/ Douglas P. Taylor                     
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                     |     | Douglas P. Taylor,
Chief Executive Officer
```

[106th Congress Public Law 203]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ203.106]

Public Law 106-203
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 1300 South Harrison Street in Fort Wayne, Indiana, as the ``E. Ross 
 Adair Federal Building and United States Courthouse''. <<NOTE: May 22, 
                         2000 -  [H.R. 2412]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 1300 
South Harrison Street in Fort Wayne, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``E. Ross Adair Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``E. Ross Adair Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Approved May 22, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2412:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106-540 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 146 (2000):
            Mar. 28, considered and passed House.
            May 4, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# Europos Sąjungos C 219I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 219I |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 63 metai2020m. liepos 3d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 219I

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

63 metai2020m. liepos 3d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Pranešimai |
| | EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI |
| | Europos Komisija |
| 2020/C 219 I/01 | Pranešimas apie Finansinių priemonių rinkų reglamento atviros prieigos nuostatų, susijusių su biržinėmis išvestinėmis finansinėmis priemonėmis, taikymo pradžios atidėjimą | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

IV   Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Europos Komisija

2020/C 219 I/01

Pranešimas apie Finansinių priemonių rinkų reglamento atviros prieigos nuostatų, susijusių su biržinėmis išvestinėmis finansinėmis priemonėmis, taikymo pradžios atidėjimą

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

IV Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Europos Komisija

| 3.7.2020 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CI 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2020

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CI 219/1

---

Pranešimas apie Finansinių priemonių rinkų reglamento atviros prieigos nuostatų, susijusių su biržinėmis išvestinėmis finansinėmis priemonėmis, taikymo pradžios atidėjimą

(2020/C 219 I/01)

Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamento (ES) Nr. 600/2014 (1) (Finansinių priemonių rinkų reglamento, FPRR) 54 straipsnio 2 dalyje numatytas pereinamasis laikotarpis, per kurį to reglamento 35 arba 36 straipsnis netaikomas toms pagrindinėms sandorio šalims (PSŠ) arba prekybos vietoms, kurios pateikė prašymą pasinaudoti šiomis pereinamojo laikotarpio nuostatomis, susijusiomis su biržinėmis išvestinėmis finansinėmis priemonėmis.

Pereinamasis laikotarpis baigiasi 2020 m. liepos 3 d. Dėl dabartinės rinkos aplinkos, kuriai dėl COVID-19 pandemijos būdingas didelis neapibrėžtumas ir kintamumas, didėja PSŠ ir prekybos vietų operacinė rizika. Dėl padidėjusios rizikos reikia daugiau dėmesio skirti veiklos tęstinumui, o prašymų suteikti prieigą vertinimas dabartinėje aplinkoje gali turėti neigiamo poveikio tinkamam prekybos biržinėmis išvestinėmis finansinėmis priemonėmis ir jų tarpuskaitos rinkų veikimui. Todėl teisėkūros institucijos susitarė pereinamąjį laikotarpį pratęsti iki 2021 m. liepos 3 d.

Taigi rinkos dalyviai turėtų žinoti, kad teisėkūros institucijos susitarė nuo 2020 m. liepos 4 d. pratęsti 54 straipsnio 2 dalyje nustatytų pereinamojo laikotarpio nuostatų, susijusių su FPRR 35 arba 36 straipsniu, galiojimą. Jų galiojimas pratęsiamas toms PSŠ arba prekybos vietoms, kurios savo kompetentingoms institucijoms pateikė prašymą pasinaudoti pereinamojo laikotarpio nuostatomis, susijusiomis su biržinėmis išvestinėmis finansinėmis priemonėmis.

---

(1)  OL L 173, 2014 6 12, p. 84.

---
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Rapidan Camp

Shenandoah National Park
118 STAT. 3874 PUBLIC LAW 108–460—DEC. 21, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2119:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Oct. 5, considered and passed House.

Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–460

108th Congress

An Act

To provide for the conveyance of Federal lands, improvements, equipment, and

resource materials at the Oxford Research Station in Granville County, North

Carolina, to the State of North Carolina.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, OXFORD RESEARCH STATION, GRANVILLE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

(a) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Agriculture shall

convey, without consideration, to the State of North Carolina all

right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel

of Federal real property consisting of approximately 4.28 acres

and administered as part of the Oxford Research Station in Granville County, North Carolina. The conveyance shall include all

improvements, equipment, and resource materials at the research

station.

(b) DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and

legal description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the

Secretary. The cost of the survey shall be borne by the State.

(c) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may

require such additional terms and conditions in connection with

the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers

appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

Approved December 21, 2004.

Dec. 21, 2004

[H.R. 2119]
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Tuskegee Airmen
National Historic SiteAlabama
Exhibit 10.3


 





 






     


     


    

 





 






    2


     


    

 





 






    3


     


    

 





 





    4
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.360 Which veterans are eligible? SBA may guarantee or make direct loans to a small business 51 percent owned by one or more of the following eligible veterans: ( a ) Vietnam-era veterans who served for a period of more than 180 days between August 5, 1964, and May 7, 1975, and were discharged other than dishonorably;
( b ) Disabled veterans of any era with a minimum compensable disability of 30 percent; or
( c ) A veteran of any era who was discharged for disability.
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries

NetZero, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (also dba PhotoSite and BlueLight Internet Service)

Juno
Online Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Classmates
Media Corporation, a Delaware corporation

Classmates
Online, Inc., a Washington corporation

United
Online Web Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (dba 50 Megs, Bizhosting, Freeservers, GlobalServers, and MySite)

United
Online Advertising Network, Inc., a Delaware corporation (dba United Online Media Group)

United
Online Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation (dba NetZero Voice)

United
Online Software Development (India) Private Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of India

MyPoints.com, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation

Opobox, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation

Classmates
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation

---



QuickLinks
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-92,143-01

EX P ARTE BRADLEY THO MAS TIMS, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR48112-A IN THE 385T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM MID LAND COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant enter ed an open plea of g uilty to two counts of obstruction or reta liation, and was sentenc ed to forty y ear s’ i mprisonment. The Eleve nth Court of Appeals aff irmed hi s conviction. Tims v. State , No. 11-17-00109- CR (Tex. App.

— Eastland April 11, 2019 ) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cle rk for

war ded it to this C ourt. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. On Dec ember 14, 2020, the trial court enter ed an order desig nating issues. The district cler k proper ly forwa

rded this application to this Court u n d er T ex as Rule of Appellate Procedur e 73.4(b)( 5). Howeve r, the application was forwa rded befor e the trial court made finding s of fac t and

co n cl u s i ons of law. We rema nd this application to the trial court to complete its evident i ar yinvestiga tion and make f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law

. T h e t rial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections , proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: January

13, 2021 Do not publish
### §876. Alien residents of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, or the Northern Mariana Islands

#### (a) General rule

This subpart shall not apply to any alien individual who is a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, or the Northern Mariana Islands during the entire taxable year and such alien shall be subject to the tax imposed by section 1.

#### (b) Cross references

**For exclusion from gross income of income derived from sources within—**

**(1) Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands, see section 931, and**

**(2) Puerto Rico, see section 933.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 281; Pub. L. 99–514, title XII, §1272(b), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2593.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–514, §1272(b), inserted ", Guam, American Samoa, or the Northern Mariana Islands" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–514, §1272(b), amended subsec. (a) generally, substituting "General rule" for "No application to certain alien residents of Puerto Rico" in heading and inserting references to residents of Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands in text.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–514, §1272(b), amended subsec. (b) generally, inserting references to Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–514 applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1986, with certain exceptions and qualifications, see section 1277 of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as a note under section 931 of this title..
Exhibit 23.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the use of our report dated February 16, 2006 in this Annual Report (Form 40-F) of TransAlta Corporation.



We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Number 333-72454 and File Number 333-101470) pertaining to TransAlta Corporations Share Option Plan and Form F-10 (File Number 333-87762) pertaining to the registration of Debt and Equity Securities of TransAlta Corporation, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of our report dated February 16, 2006 included in this Form 40-F.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Alberta



March 24, 2006
### §1451. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) The term "State court" includes the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

(2) The term "State" includes the District of Columbia.

(Added Pub. L. 91–358, title I, §172(d)(1), July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 591.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective first day of seventh calendar month which begins after July 29, 1970, see section 199(a) of Pub. L. 91–358, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 1257 of this title.
HomeAbout NRC

# Radiation Protection

Although radiation is naturally present in our environment, it can have either beneficial or harmful effects, depending on its use and control. For that reason, Congress charged the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) with protecting people and the environment from unnecessary exposure to radiation as a result of civilian uses of nuclear materials. Toward that end, the NRC requires nuclear power plants; research reactors; and other medical, industrial, and academic licensees to use and store radioactive materials in a way that eliminates unnecessary exposure and protects radiation workers and the public.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, September 10, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - The Commission
          - Organization & Functions
          - Governing Legislation
          - Plans, Budgets, & Performance
          - Locations
          - History
          - Values
          - Commission Direction-Setting and Policymaking Activities
          - Radiation Protection
          - Fire Protection
          - Safety Culture
          - How We Regulate
          - Emergency Preparedness & Response
          - Counterfeit, Fraudulent, and Suspect Items
          - Public Affairs
          - Congressional Affairs
          - International Programs
          - State & Tribal Programs
          - Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs
          - Privacy Program
          - EEO/Civil Rights Program
          - About the NRC & Your Community
          - Contact Us
          - Career Opportunities
          - Contracting Opportunities
          - Grant Opportunities
          - Generic Schedules
          - NRC at a Glance

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

#### Key Topics

            - Calculate Your Dose
            - Minimize Your Exposure
            - Radiation Dispersion Maps and Information
            - Doses In Our Daily Lives
            - Tritium Contamination
            - Information for Radiation Workers
            - Dirty Bombs - What To Do

Frequently Asked Questions

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, September 10, 2021
HomeAbout NRCCounterfeit, Fraudulent, and Suspect Items

# Safety Culture Policy Statement

The Safety Culture Policy Statement (76 FR 34773; June 14, 2011) describes the Commission's expectation that individuals and organizations performing regulated activities establish and maintain a positive safety culture that recognizes the safety and security significance of their activities and the nature and complexity of their organizations and functions.

The Safety Culture Policy Statement applies to all licensees, certificate holders, permit holders, authorization holders, holders of quality assurance program approvals, vendors and suppliers of safety-related components, and applicants for a license, certificate, permit, authorization, or quality assurance program approval subject to NRC authority.

NUREG/BR-0500, "Safety Culture Policy Statement," describes traits of a positive nuclear safety culture, which is an important element of a licensee's or supplier's program for detecting and eliminating CFSI.
        - NRC Safety Culture

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Guidance Documents and Background Information
          - Safety Culture Policy Statement
          - Public Presentations

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, August 25, 2020