alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0721

Directorate Identifier: 2012NM076AD

601R-25-187, RA --- 9/1/11

601R-25-187 --- 7/21/11

601R-25-198 --- 9/1/11

601R-25-199 --- 9/1/11

COMTEK COMSB-25-52-001. RA --- 12/29/11

SECONDARY SBS:

C&D ZODIAK B301002-25-01 --- 4/19/11

C&D ZODIAK B301002-25-02, R1 --- 6/16/11

C&D ZODIAK B301003-25-01 --- 4/19/11

C&D ZODIAK B301003-25-02, R1 --- 8/31/11

C&D ZODIAK 4652005-25-01 --- 3/10/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket
MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
### **CHAPTER 87—DISTRICT COURTS; VENUE**

Sec.
1390.
Scope.
1391.
Venue generally.
[1392, 1393. Repealed.]
1394.
Banking association's action against Comptroller of Currency.
1395.
Fine, penalty or forfeiture.
1396.
Internal revenue taxes.
1397.
Interpleader.
1398.
Interstate Commerce Commission's orders.
1399.
Partition action involving United States.
1400.
Patents and copyrights, mask works, and designs.
1401.
Stockholder's derivative action.
1402.
United States as defendant.
1403.
Eminent domain.
1404.
Change of venue.
1405.
Creation or alteration of district or division.
1406.
Cure or waiver of defects.
1407.
Multidistrict litigation.
1408.
Venue of cases under title 11.
1409.
Venue of proceedings arising under title 11 or arising in or related to cases under title 11.
1410.
Venue of cases ancillary to foreign proceedings.
1411.
Jury trials.
1412.
Change of venue.
1413.
Venue of cases under chapter 5 of title 3.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2011**—Pub. L. 112–63, title II, §§201(b), 203, Dec. 7, 2011, 125 Stat. 763, 764, added item 1390 and struck out item 1392 "Defendants or property in different districts in same State".

**1998**—Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §503(c)(3), Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2917 inserted ", mask works, and designs" in item 1400.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–331, §3(b)(2)(B), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4069, which directed amendment of table of sections for chapter 37 by adding item 1413 at end, was executed by adding item 1413 at end of table of sections for chapter 87 to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–702, title X, §1001(a), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4664, struck out item 1393 "Divisions; single defendant; defendants in different divisions".

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–353, title I, §102(b), July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 335, added items 1408 to 1412.

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §240(b), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2668, directed the addition of item 1408, "Bankruptcy appeals", which amendment did not become effective pursuant to section 402(b) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.

**1968**—Pub. L. 90–296, §2, Apr. 29, 1968, 82 Stat. 110, added item 1407.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.211 What limits are there on the amounts of direct loans? ( a ) The statutory limit for direct loans made under the authority of section 7(a)(1)-(19) of the Small Business Act is $350,000. SBA has established an administrative limit of $150,000 for direct loans. The D/FA may authorize acceptance of an application up to the statutory limit.
( b ) The statutory limit for direct loans made under the authority of section 7(a)(20) is $750,000. SBA has established an administrative limit of $150,000. The Associate Administrator for Business Development may authorize the acceptance of an application that exceeds the administrative limit.
( c ) The statutory limit on SBA's portion of an immediate participation loan is $350,000. The administrative limit is the lesser of 75 percent of the loan or $150,000. The D/FA may authorize exceptions to the administrative limit up to $350,000.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 45753, Sept. 4, 2009]
### §1746. Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

Wherever, under any law of the United States or under any rule, regulation, order, or requirement made pursuant to law, any matter is required or permitted to be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by the sworn declaration, verification, certificate, statement, oath, or affidavit, in writing of the person making the same (other than a deposition, or an oath of office, or an oath required to be taken before a specified official other than a notary public), such matter may, with like force and effect, be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by the unsworn declaration, certificate, verification, or statement, in writing of such person which is subscribed by him, as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form:

(1) If executed without the United States: "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date).

(Signature)".

(2) If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths: "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date).

(Signature)".

(Added Pub. L. 94–550, §1(a), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2534.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1746 was renumbered section 1745 of this title.
### [§218. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–600, title I, §113(a)(1), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2778]

Section, added Pub. L. 92–178, title VII, §702(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 561; amended Pub. L. 93–625, §§11(d), 12(b), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2120; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834, related to contributions to candidates for public office.

A prior section 218 was renumbered section 224 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective with respect to contributions the payment of which is made after Dec. 31, 1978, in taxable years beginning after such date, see section 113(d) of Pub. L. 95–600, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 24 of this title.
### [§1393. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–702, title X, §1001(a), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4664]

Section, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 935, related to divisional venue in civil cases of a single defendant or defendants in different divisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 100–702, title X, §1001(b), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4664, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [repealing this section] take effect 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 19, 1988]."
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.912 Borrowed contributions.

The Borrower may borrow its cash contribution from the CDC or a third party. If any of the contribution is borrowed, the interest rate must be reasonable. If the loan is secured by any of the Project assets, the loan must be subordinate to the liens securing the 504 Loan, and the loan may not be repaid at a faster rate than the 504 Loan unless SBA gives prior written approval. A third party lender may not receive voting rights, stock options, or any other actual or potential voting interest in the small business.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLife and dynamic capacity modeling for aircraft transmissionsA computer program to simulate the dynamic capacity and life of parallel shaft aircraft transmissions is presented. Five basic configurations can be analyzed: single mesh, compound, parallel, reverted, and single plane reductions. In execution, the program prompts the user for the data file prefix name, takes input from a ASCII file, and writes its output to a second ASCII file with the same prefix name. The input data file includes the transmission configuration, the input shaft torque and speed, and descriptions of the transmission geometry and the component gears and bearings. The program output file describes the transmission, its components, their capabilities, locations, and loads. It also lists the dynamic capability, ninety percent reliability, and mean life of each component and the transmission as a system. Here, the program, its input and output files, and the theory behind the operation of the program are described.Document ID19910010125Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSavage, Michael*(Akron Univ. Akron, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberE-5824NASA-CR-4341NAS 1.26:4341AVSCOM-TR-90-C-027Accession Number91N19438Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-55PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-36PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-62211-A-47-ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910010125.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VI, L.P. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 30, 2002, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of the General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge and beliefs:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theRegistrant.

|                                                                                                              |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS  **Douglas P. Williams****Chief Financial Officer****November 13, 2002**21 |
ex425





 EXHIBIT
4.25







	


Extension of Debenture Maturity Date


 


	

TO


 

	

Intellipharmaceutics
International Inc. (the “Company”)


 


	

RE:


 

	

Debenture
dated May 1, 2019, with an original face amount of US$1,050,000
issued by the Company to Dr. Isa Odidi and Dr. Amina Odidi (the
“Debenture”) and
the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture) of such
Debenture


 







 

 


The
undersigned hereby agree that the Maturity Date of the Debenture
(currently December 31, 2020) is extended to May 31,
2021.

 


DATED
as of December 31, 2020.

 



 

 


	
/s/ Isa
Odidi


	
 /s/ Amina
Odidi



	
Isa Odidi


	
 Amina Odidi
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2004-19249.                 

*Date Filed:*                     September 29, 2004.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport  Association.                

*Subject:*

PTC2 EUR 0584, PTC2 EUR-ME 0196, PTC2 EUR-AFR 0211

Dated 1 October 2004.

Mail Vote 413—Resolution 010y

Special Passenger Amending Resolution from Algeria. 

Intended Effective Date: 18 November 2004. 

Andrea M. Jenkins,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 04-22944 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

March 16, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 133255 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ _____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE GREGORY KENNETH MICHAEL CAMPBELL, NATALIE JOCELYNNE NICOLE CAMPBELL, NATHAN JEFFREY ALLEN CAMPBELL, and JESSIC A LYNNE CHRISTINA CAMPBELL, Minors.

_____________ _______________ _____________

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERICES, f/k/a FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 133255 COA: 269585 Oakland CC

KENNETH FALKIEWICZ, Respondent-Appellant, Family Division: 03-684390-NA

and

TAMMY LYNNE CAMPBELL, Respondent.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0313 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 16, 2007

Clerk
PDX deicing treatment system status

Aha, Susan to: Eric Strassler 02/03/2012 06:21 PM

From: "Aha, Susan" <Susan.Aha@portofportland.com>

To: Eric Strassler/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Eric,

I will send via separate email a couple of photos of the new facility. In terms of status, here’s a brief

summary:

Construction of the PDX deicing anaerobic fluidized bed reactor (AFBR) and associated infrastructure

was substantially completed in August 2011.   The AFBR treatment system was started‐up up the week

of September 19, 2011 and we are currently bringing the system to design capacity.  We anticipate

reaching 100% of design capacity for the AFBR system in March 2012.  Start‐up testing is scheduled to be

complete at the end of April 2012.

If you need more information, let me know.

Susan Aha

Aviation Water Program Manager

Port of Portland

phone: (503) 415-6326

fax: (503) 548-5619

cell: (503) 803-9673

email: susan.aha@portofportland.com
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Zion
National ParkUtah
§ 123.5 What kinds of loans are available? ( a ) *Disaster loans authorized under Section 7(b).* SBA offers four kinds of disaster loans as authorized by Section 7(b) of the Small Business Act: Physical disaster home loans, physical disaster business loans, economic injury disaster business loans, and Military Reservist EIDL loans. SBA makes these loans directly or in participation with a financial institution. If a disaster loan authorized under Section 7(b) is made in participation with a financial institution, SBA's share in that loan may not exceed 90 percent.
( b ) *IDAP loans.* SBA also offers IDAP loans as authorized by Section 42 of the Small Business Act. SBA makes these interim guaranteed disaster loans to small businesses only in participation with a financial institution. SBA's share in an IDAP loan is equal to 85 percent.
[75 FR 60597, Oct. 1, 2010]
§ 113.420 Access to schools operated by LEAs. A recipient that is a local educational agency shall not, on the basis of sex, exclude any person from admission to: ( a ) Any institution of vocational education operated by such recipient; or
( b ) Any other school or educational unit operated by such recipient, unless such recipient otherwise makes available to such person, pursuant to the same policies and criteria of admission, courses, services, and facilities comparable to each course, service, and facility offered in or through such schools.
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 388

**Question 388:** In regard to Question 91 (previously answered in the third set of Q&As), can NIOSH approved respiratory equipment which makes use of a combination particulate filter and iodine sorbent with a protection factor for particulates be used in a mixed particulate and iodine atmosphere to limit intakes? This practice would seem valid for equipment that is NIOSH approved and has a protection factor for particulates.

**Answer:** Yes. However, there is no assigned protection factor for radioiodine with this equipment. [The NRC may authorize radioiodine protection factors for this equipment in accordance with 10 CFR 20.1703 (b) (2) as it has previously authorized them in accordance with 10 CFR 20.103 (d).]

(References: 10 CFR 20.1702, 10 CFR 20.1703)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, November 27, 2017
### Jaffe, Darren (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: 

### Subject: Attachments:

DEAR SIRS: julio gonzalez <julio-gzz@hotmail.com> Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:00 PM Jaffe, Darren (OST) Finamore, Robert (OST) Aero Zano exemption DOT AERO CERT.zip !" ··.'**;.··:,~**..

<:.:::") : ......**c~.,** AS PERYOURREQUEST ENCLOSED YOU WILL FIND A LETTERTO CERTIFY THENAME OF SHAREHOLDERS OF DESARROLLO INTEGRADO, S. A. DE C. V., AND THE PERCENTAGE(%) OF THEIR PARTICIPATION IN THE COMPANY.
THEY ARE ALL MEXICAN CITIZENS. ALSO I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THE COMPANY THAT PROVIDES THE MAINTENANCE FOR THE AIRCRAFT OPERATED BY AEROZANO S. A. DE C. V. , IS AVIACION COMERCIAL DE AMERCIA, S. A. DE C. V., AS WE PONITED OUT IN OUR DOT APLICATION.
IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE LET US KNOW, AND WE WILL BE HAPPY TO PROVIDE IT.

BEST REGARDS, JULIO GONZALEZ SANTOS



### Good morning Mr. Gonzalez-Santos, I am processing an exemption application for Aero Zano, S.A. de C.V. I am contacting you because Ineed additional informationto complete my analysis. This informationis: 1. Where is aircraft maintenance conducted, and 2. DesaiTollo Integrado, S.A. de C.V. is listed as holding 99.99% ofAero Zano's shares. Please provide the name and citizenship ofindividuals who own 5% ormore ofstock in that corporation. The docket number for Aero Zano's application is DOT-OST-2012-0217. Thankyou, Darren Jaffe Darren Jaffe 1

### 201**l"nr•··,.·,~~n\1 '"',..'"'""~"'~~""'rt>.N**  under the Estados PSI'tiCIP8l:lOn of issued of 

### 1 Monterrey, N.L. ofJune



### Zambrano the de
, 

4. 

Cadish 

J 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

AMMAR ASIM FARUQ HARRIS, A/K/A 

AMMAR ASIMFARUQ HARRIS, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 84676 

FILE 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court minute "Order 

denying Ex Parte Motion For Order to Represent Self and Motion to 

Withdraw Counsel entered in this action on April 27th, 2022." Eighth 

Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge. 

Because no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from the 

aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. 

Castillo u. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining 

that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for 

appeal). Accordingly, this court 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

2.2-167141 
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge 

Ammar Asirn Farug Harris 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OP 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A 4104.,
§ 3175.49 Accounting systems. An accounting system with a name and version listed at *www.blm.gov* is approved for use in reporting logs and records to the BLM. The approval is specific to those makes and models of flow computers for which testing demonstrates compatibility. Approval for a particular name and version of accounting system used with a particular make and model of flow computer is obtained as follows: ( a ) For daily QTRs (see § 3175.104(a)), an operator or vendor must submit daily QTRs to the BLM both from the accounting system and directly from the flow computer for at least 6 consecutive monthly reporting periods;
( b ) For hourly QTRs (see § 3175.104(a)), an operator must submit hourly QTRs to the BLM both from the accounting system and directly from the flow computer for at least 15 consecutive daily reporting periods. (A vendor may submit such information on behalf of an operator);
( c ) For configuration logs (see § 3175.104(b)), an operator must submit at least 10 configuration logs to the BLM taken at random times covering a span of at least 6 months both from the accounting system and directly from the flow computer. (A vendor may submit such information on behalf of an operator);
( d ) For event logs (see § 3175.104(c)), an operator must submit an event log to the BLM containing at least 50 events both from the accounting system and directly from the flow computer. (A vendor may submit such information on behalf of an operator);
( e ) For alarm logs (see § 3175.104(d)), an operator must submit an alarm log to the BLM containing at least 50 alarm conditions both from the accounting system and directly from the flow computer (a vendor may submit such information on behalf of an operator);
( f ) The BLM may require additional tests and records that may be necessary to determine that the software meets the requirements of § 3175.104(a);
( g ) The records retrieved directly from the flow computer in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section must be unedited;
( h ) The records retrieved from the accounting system in paragraphs (a) through (d) must include both edited and unedited versions; and
( i ) The BLM will approve the accounting system name and version for use with the make and model of flow computer used for comparison, and add the system name and version to the list of approved systems maintained at *www.blm.gov* if: ( 1 ) The BLM compares the records retrieved directly from the flow computer with the unedited records from the accounting system and there are no significant discrepancies; and
( 2 ) The BLM compares the records retrieved directly from the flow computer with the edited records from the accounting system and all changes are clearly indicated, the reason for each change is indicated or is available upon request, and the edited version is clearly distinguishable from the unedited version.