alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 115
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 115 appear at 72 FR 50038, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 115.14 Loss of Principal's eligibility for future assistance and reinstatement of Principal. ( a ) *Ineligibility.* A Principal and its Affiliates lose eligibility for further SBA bond guarantees if any of the following occurs under an SBA-guaranteed bond issued on behalf of the Principal: ( 1 ) Legal action under the guaranteed bond has been initiated.
( 2 ) The Obligee has declared the Principal to be in default under the Contract.
( 3 ) The Surety has established a claim reserve for the bond of at least $10,000.
( 4 ) The Principal, or any of its Affiliates, has defaulted on an SBA-guaranteed bond resulting in a Loss that has not been fully reimbursed to SBA, or SBA has not been fully reimbursed for any Imminent Breach payments.
( 5 ) The guarantee fee has not been paid by the Principal.
( 6 ) The Principal committed fraud or material misrepresentation in obtaining the guaranteed bond.
( b ) *Reinstatement of Principal's eligibility.* At any time after a Principal becomes ineligible for further bond guarantees under paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) A Prior Approval Surety may recommend that such Principal's eligibility be reinstated, and OSG may agree to reinstate the Principal if: ( i ) The Surety has settled its claim with the Principal, or any of its Affiliates, for an amount that results in no Loss to SBA or in no amount owed for Imminent Breach payments, or OSG finds good cause for reinstating the Principal notwithstanding the Loss to SBA or amount owed for Imminent Breach payments; or
( ii ) OSG and the Surety determine that further bond guarantees are appropriate after the Principal was deemed ineligible for further SBA bond guarantees under paragraph (a)(1), (2), (3), (5) or (6) of this section.
( 2 ) A PSB Surety may: ( i ) Recommend that such Principal's eligibility be reinstated, and OSG may agree to reinstate the Principal, if the Surety has settled its claim with the Principal, or any of its Affiliates, for an amount that results in no Loss to SBA or in no amount owed for Imminent Breach payments, or OSG finds good cause for reinstating the Principal notwithstanding the Loss to SBA or amount owed for Imminent Breach payments; or
( ii ) Reinstate a Principal's eligibility upon the Surety's determination that further bond guarantees are appropriate after the Principal was deemed ineligible for further SBA bond guarantees under paragraph (a)(1), (2), (3), (5) or (6) of this section.
( c ) *Underwriting after reinstatement.* A guarantee application submitted after reinstatement of the Principal's eligibility is subject to a very stringent underwriting review.
[61 FR 3271, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 23565, Apr. 22, 2016; 87 FR 48084, Aug. 8, 2022]
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Ratesetting
            - CVP Annual Ratebooks & Schedules
            - CVP Ratebooks - M&I, 2006 

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP)                  - About the CVP
                - Water Info Links
                - Ratesetting
                - Projects/Activities
                - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation                         of the CVP and SWP
                - Laws/Regs/Links
                - Financial Information 
                - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
              - Programs & Activities
              - Projects & Facilities
              - Doing Business with Reclamation
              - Public Affairs
              - Employment
              - Recreation
              - Site Index
              - Contact Us

## CVP Ratebooks - M&I, 2006

*Note:  Documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) require Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher to view, download Adobe Acrobat Reader*

*Last Updated: 7/15/20*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

          - Contact Us
          - Site Index
          - Accessibility
          - Disclaimer
          - DOI
          - FOIA
          - No Fear Act
          - Notices
          - Privacy Policy
          - Quality of Information
          - Recreation.gov
          - USA.gov
HomeAbout NRCCareer OpportunitiesOpportunities

# Disabled

The NRC is committed to increasing the number of NRC staff with disabilities and ensuring that all employees reach their full potential.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) issued its final rule to amend the regulations that require federal agencies to engage in affirmative action for individuals with disabilities. These changes clarify the obligations that the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 imposes on federal agencies, as employers, that are over and above the obligation not to discriminate on the basis of disability.

Through effective recruitment, hiring, and retention efforts we work to identify and remove barriers to employment and promotion within the organization for individuals with disabilities. We also work to increase knowledge and awareness of issues related to employment of people with disabilities.

Learn more about NRCs Comprehensive Diversity Management Plan and reasonable accommodations program at our Diversity page.

For information on special appointing authorities and applying for federal positions visit USAJobs.

If you are an individual with disability and have questions or need assistance applying for positions please see our Contact Us About Employment page.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, January 25, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Career Paths
          - Students
          - Disabled
          - Veterans

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, January 25, 2021
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Timucuan
Ecological & Historic Preserve
Florida


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Theodore Roosevelt Area
 Green Trail Closure
A portion of the Green Trail at the Theodore Roosevelt Area is closed to public access until further notice due to excessive erosion.

The Theodore Roosevelt Area is a 600-acre natural treasure of hardwood forest, wetlands, and scrub vegetation. It is also rich in cultural history.
Visitors can experience miles of thickly wooded peaceful nature trails, vast grassland that supports both water and land animals, ancient piles of discarded oyster shells which yield clues about an extinct culture, and the legacy of preservation bequeathed to all by this property's last private owner, Willie Browne. The Theodore Roosevelt Area is open 9:00 to 4:45 daily.
Directions to the Theodore Roosevelt Area
13175 Mt. Pleasant Rd.
Jacksonville, FL 32225
Brochure and Hiking Map
Nature and History
Pets are allowed, but must be on a six-foot leash. Remember to bring water and lock your vehicle before you head out.

trails and trail mapThe hiking trails are open and waiting for you. NPS Photo/Stankiewicz
 Last updated: June 22, 2023
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 12713 Fort Caroline Road
Jacksonville,
FL
32225
 Phone: 904-641-7155 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
(No. 1099

Claimant awarded $2,749.92.)

#### Electric Household Utilities Corporation, formerly Hurley Machine Company, a Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May*26, 1927.

Franchise *tax*— refund *may be awarded for excess' payment.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court in case of *Altorfor Bros.*v. *State, supra.*

Paul O’Donnell, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; David J. Kadyk, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claim in this case is for excess annual franchise taxes paid in the years 1920, 1921 and 1922. The excess amount paid in each of those years was as follows:

> In 1920 .................................$6,568.00

> In 1921 ................................ 5,234.58

These sums aggregate $11,802.58. In addition thereto, the claimant paid in 1922 the sum of $2,749.92. These figures are not in dispute and represent the excess amount paid under the construction of the- statute as given by the Supreme Court of Illinois- in the case of *People, ex rel, Roberts & Schaefer*v. *Emmerson,*305 Ill. 348. The same questions are involved in this case as were involved in the Altorfer Brothers case and our conclusions with reference to them are the same.

There is, however, an additional defense in this case which did not occur in the Altorfer case and that is the defense of the Statute of Limitations. As to the first two items, aggregating somewhat over $11,000, the money was paid more than five years prior to the filing of the claim. For the reasons which we have heretofore given at length in the case of Booth Fisheries Company, we are constrained to disallow that part of the claim of this claimant. We, however, do allow and award to the claimant the sum of $2,749.92, paid in 1922, which sum we believe the State in equity and good conscience should pay.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40712

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS JASSO BOTELLO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:09-CR-325-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Luis Jasso Botello has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jasso Botello has not filed a response. Our independent

review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw pursuant to Anders is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Counsel’s motion for leave to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 4, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 09-40712 Document: 00511099502 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2010
No. 09-40712

2

withdraw due to his possible appointment as a United States Magistrate Judge

is DENIED as moot.

Case: 09-40712 Document: 00511099502 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2010
PUBLIC LAW 108–491—DEC. 23, 2004 118 STAT. 3973

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5363:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Nov. 17, considered and passed House.

Dec. 8, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–491

108th Congress

An Act

To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United States for

fiscal year 2005.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR FEDERAL

JUSTICES AND JUDGES.

Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97–92, Justices and

judges of the United States are authorized during fiscal year 2005

to receive a salary adjustment in accordance with section 461 of

title 28, United States Code.

Approved December 23, 2004.

28 USC 461 note.

Dec. 23, 2004

[H.R. 5363]
### §5614. Burden of proof in cases of seizure of spirits

Whenever seizure is made of any distilled spirits found elsewhere than on the premises of a distilled spirits plant, or than in any warehouse authorized by law, or than in the store or place of business of a wholesale liquor dealer, or than in transit from any one of said places; or of any distilled spirits found in any one of the places aforesaid, or in transit therefrom, which have not been received into or sent out therefrom in conformity to law, or in regard to which any of the entries required by law, or regulations issued pursuant thereto, to be made in respect of such spirits, have not been made at the time or in the manner required, or in respect to which any owner or person having possession, control, or charge of said spirits, has omitted to do any act required to be done, or has done or committed any act prohibited in regard to said spirits, the burden of proof shall be upon the claimant of said spirits to show that no fraud has been committed, and that all the requirements of the law in relation to the payment of the tax have been complied with.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5614, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 685, related to penalty and forfeiture for removal of spirits during prohibited hours, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859. See sections 5687 and 7301 of this title.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior section 5649, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 694, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Visit Gran Quivira

Salinas Pueblo Missions National Monument
EXHIBIT 3

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 1 of 2
Nokia 2.3

Discover the power of AI

Sign up Watch now

From $ 129 Buy now

Phones Explore Android Android phones Classic phones For enterprises Community Support

FEATURES

Nokia 2.3

Discover the power of AI with Nokia 2.3. It lasts up to 2 days with Adaptive Battery technology, takes

epic shots with AI imaging – even in low-light – and unlocks with a glance. Bring great stories to life with

the impressive 6.2” HD+ 19:9 screen. Plus, it’s ready for Android 10 and beyond so you can look forward

to 2 years of software upgrades and 3 years of monthly security updates.

1

Design Colors Cyan Green, Sand, Charcoal

Size 157.69 x 75.41 x 8.68mm

Weight 183g

Performance Operating system Android 9 Pie

RAM 2 GB

CPU MediaTek Helio A22

Connectivity Cable type Micro USB (USB 2.0)

SIM cards Dual SIM and Single SIM models available

SIM card type Nano SIM

Sensors Ambient light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer (Gsensor)

Keys The Google Assistant Button

2

Environmental profile Read more

Cameras Rear cameras 13 MP f/2.2 + 2 MP depth sensing

Rear flash LED

Front-facing camera 5 MP f/2.4

Other Biometric face unlock

Battery Battery type Non-removable 4000 mAh

Charging 5V/1A compatible

3

Storage Internal storage 32 GB

MicroSD card slot Support for up to 512 GB

4

Display Size 6.2”

Type HD+ with waterdrop notch

Display ratio 19:9

Audio 3.5 mm headphone jack

FM radio receiver (headset required)

1 microphone

Network and connectivity Network bands GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | WCDMA: 1, 5, 8 | LTE: 1, 3,

5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 (120MHz)

Network bands (Latin America and USA) GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |

WCDMA: 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 | LTE: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12/17, 28, 66

Network bands (India) GSM 850, 900, 1800 | WCDMA: 1, 5, 8 | LTE: 1, 3,

5, 8, 40, 41 (120MHz)

Network speed LTE Cat 4

WiFi 802.11 b/g/n

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 2 of 2
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4852 

To permanently authorize the SBIR and STTR programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2022 

Mrs. SHAHEEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To permanently authorize the SBIR and STTR programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENCY OF SBIR AND STTR PROGRAMS. 

4 (a) SBIR.—Section 9(m) of the Small Business Act 

5 (15 U.S.C. 638(m)) is amended— 

6 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking 

7 ‘‘TERMINATION’’ and inserting ‘‘SBIR PROGRAM

8 AUTHORIZATION’’; and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘terminate on September 30, 

10 2022’’ and inserting ‘‘be in effect for each fiscal 

11 year’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4852 IS

1 (b) STTR.—Section 9(n)(1)(A) of the Small Busi2 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 638(n)(1)(A)) is amended by striking 

3 ‘‘through fiscal year 2022’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO.: 9:20cv80983

CAMERON DAVIDSON,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HERE NORTH AMERICA, LLC.,

Defendant.

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS 

AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Plaintiff, Cameron Davidson (“Davidson”) by and through undersigned counsel,

hereby discloses the following pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1:

1. The name of each person, attorney, association of persons, firm, law firm, 

partnership and corporation that has or may have an interest in the outcome of this action 

– including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, publicly-traded 

companies that own 10% or more of a party’s stock, and all other identifiable legal 

entities related to any party in the case:

Cameron Davidson Plaintiff

Sergio Calderon Baron Plaintiff’s Counsel

Image Theft Law Firm, P.A. Plaintiff’s Counsel

Here North America, Llc. Defendant

Davidson states that there are no other persons, associations or persons, 

firms, partnerships, guarantors, insurers, affiliates, parent or subsidiary 

Case 9:20-cv-80983-AHS Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 1 of 3
corporations, or other legal entities that are financially interested in the outcome of 

the case other than the parties to this action and their respective counsel.

2. The name of every other entity whose publicly-traded stock, equity or debt 

may be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceedings:

None.

3. The name of every other entity which is likely to be an active participant 

in the proceedings, including the debtor and members of the creditor’s committee (or 

twenty largest unsecured creditors) in bankruptcy cases:

None.

4. The name of each victim (individual or corporate) of civil or criminal 

conduct alleged to be wrongful, including every person who may be entitled to 

restitution.

Cameron Davidson

I hereby certify that, except as disclosed above, I am unaware of any action or 

potential conflict of interest involving the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to 

this case, and will immediately notify the Court in writing on learning of any such 

conflict.

Dated: June 23, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, 

Case 9:20-cv-80983-AHS Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 2 of 3
/s/ Sergio Calderon Baron

SERGIO CALDERON BARON

Florida Bar No.: 1007687

sergio@imagetheftlawfirm.com

561.406.8256

Image Theft Law Firm P.A.

4800 N. Federal Hwy., Suite D207

Boca Raton, FL 33431

Attorney for Plaintiff Cameron Davidson

Case 9:20-cv-80983-AHS Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 3 of 3
§ 49.610 How is the “cost of response, restoration, and repair” determined for criminal and civil penalties? In determining a criminal or civil penalty, the cost of response, restoration, and repair of a paleontological resource and/or paleontological site will include, but not be limited to, the costs of: ( a ) Law enforcement investigations;
( b ) Immediate stabilization of the resource and the site;
( c ) Response, restoration, and repair, including, but not limited to, reconstructing or stabilizing the resource or site, salvaging the resource or site, erecting physical barriers or other protective devices or signs to protect the site, and monitoring the site;
( d ) Preparation of the paleontological specimen;
( e ) Storage and curation of the resources; and
( f ) Reporting upon the above activities.
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT 10.25

                         CENTURA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

                          EXECUTIVE RETENTION PROGRAM

The following is a brief summary of the Executive Retention Program approved 
by the Board of Directors of Centura Software Corporation (the "Company") on 
June 20, 1997 pursuant to which Key Executive Agreements may be entered into 
by the Company with each of Samuel Inman, Michael Keddington, Earl Stahl and 
Richard Gelhaus (collectively, "Key Executives"). Terms of the Key Executive 
Agreements are as follows.

Upon consummation of any "Sale of the Company" (as defined below), each Key 
Executive shall receive, if such Key Executive continues to be employed by 
the Company at that time:

-    payment of an amount equal to the Key Executive's total compensation for 
     fiscal year 1996; and

-    continuing coverage under the Company's standard employee benefits 
     package for one year following the effective date of the Sale of the 
     Company.

Definitions:

"Sale of the Company" means:

-    (1) a merger or consolidation that results in more than 50% of the 
     voting stock of the Company or its successor changing ownership (whether 
     or not approved by the Board);

     or

-    (2) the sale of all or substantially all of the Company's assets.