alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION  I, Keith Berman, Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of instaCare Corp., certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of InstaCare Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 9, 2010  /s/ Keith Berman Keith Berman Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
0-cr-06216-LSS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2000 Pa
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.816 CDC non-profit status and good standing. A CDC must be a non-profit corporation, except that for-profit CDCs certified by SBA prior to January 1, 1987 may retain their certifications. An SBIC may not become a CDC. A CDC must be in good standing based upon the following criteria: ( a ) In good standing in the State in which the CDC is incorporated and any other State in which the CDC conducts business.
( b ) In compliance with all laws, including taxation requirements, in the State in which the CDC is incorporated and any other State in which the CDC conducts business.
( c ) Must have satisfactory SBA performance, as determined by SBA in its discretion. The CDC's Risk Rating, among other factors, will be considered in determining satisfactory SBA performance. Other factors may include, but are not limited to, review/examination assessments, historical performance measures, loan volume to the extent that it impacts performance measures, and other performance related measurements and information (such as contribution toward SBA mission).
( d ) If a non-profit CDC has a membership and the members are responsible for electing or appointing voting directors to the CDC's Board of Directors, no person or entity can control more than 25 percent of the CDC's voting membership.
[68 FR 57980, Oct. 7, 2003, as amended at 73 FR 75518, Dec. 11, 2008. Redesignated at 79 FR 15649, Mar. 21, 2014; 82 FR 39504, Aug. 21, 2017; 84 FR 66294, Dec. 4, 2019]
§ 422.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Department* means the United States Department of the Interior.
( b ) *Reclamation* means the Bureau of Reclamation of the United States Department of the Interior.
( c ) *Law Enforcement Program* means Reclamation's program to provide law enforcement and protective services at Reclamation project facilities and on Federal project lands. The activity is directed toward the preservation of public order, safety, and protection of resources and facilities, and their occupants.
( d ) *Law Enforcement Administrator (LEA)* means the person designated by the Commissioner of Reclamation to: ( 1 ) Direct the law enforcement program and units;
( 2 ) Develop the policy, procedures, and standards for the law enforcement program within Reclamation; and
( 3 ) Provide for inspection and oversight to control enforcement activity.
( e ) *Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO)* means the highest level duly authorized law enforcement officer for a non-Department law enforcement agency.
( f ) *Law Enforcement Officer* means: ( 1 ) A duly authorized Federal law enforcement officer, as that term is defined in Public Law 107-69, from any non-Department Federal agency who is authorized to act as a law enforcement officer on Reclamation projects and lands; or
( 2 ) Law enforcement personnel of any State, local government, or tribal law enforcement agency.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Spanish Missions/Misiones Españolas





Contact Us
  Mission San José de Tumacácori-- Spanish Colonial Missions of the Southwest Travel Itinerary
 Página en español
 Mission San José de Tumacácori — at Tumacacori National Monument Photograph courtesy of Jsweida under the Createive Commons license **Mission San José de Tumacácori** **Tumacácori National Historical Park, Arizona**Coordinates:31.562638, -111.050008#TravelSpanishMissionsDiscover Our Shared HeritageSpanish Colonial Missions of the Southwest Travel Itinerary
 Mission San José de TumacácoriToday, Tumacácori is visited by thousands of people every year. Courtesy of the National Park Service.
 Mission San José de TumacácoriO'odham Circle Dance at the Fiesta de Tumacácori held at the park annually. Courtesy of the National Park Service. "Open Territory with Good Lands" 
 comales
 Mission San José de TumacácoriMission San José de Tumacácori, profile of the church and the granary. Photo by Ammodramus. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
 What you can see today
 
 Mission San José de TumacácoriPlan view of the Tumacácori mission complex. NPS map. Courtesy of the National Park Service.
 **Plan Your Visit**
 **Tumacácori National Historical Park, a unit of the National Park System is located 45 miles south of Tucson, AZ off exit 29 on I-19. The visitor center for the Tumacácori National Historical Park is located at 1891 East Frontage Rd., Tumacácori, AZ and is open 9:00am to 5:00pm daily, except Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Click here for the National Register of Historic Places file: text and photos. There is an admission fee. For more information, visit the National Park Service Tumacácori National Historical Park website or call 520-377-5060.** **The****Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail passes through Tumacácori; please visit their website for information on sites along the 1,200-mile trail that connects history, culture, and outdoor recreation across 20 counties of Arizona and California.****Tumacácori National Historical Park is also featured in the National Park Service Places Reflecting America's Diverse Cultures: Explore their Stories in the National Park System Travel Itinerary and the American Latino Heritage Travel Itinerary.**
 Discover our Shared Heritage Travel Itinerary Program Frequently Asked Questions
 **^TOP**
 Last updated: April 15, 2016
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### In the Matter of Emil W. Klappert v. Ettar Realty Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         112,269
<SECURITIES>                                17,252,930
<RECEIVABLES>                                  464,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   300
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,829,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          495,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,334,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,829,821
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               824,812
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                762,409
<INCOME-TAX>                                   762,409
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            762,409
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   762,409
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEANE GREGORY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

GUST ROSENFELD PLC; MARICOPA

COUNTY ATTORNEY; SUPERIOR

COURT OF ARIZONA, Maricopa County;

ARIZONA STATE BAR,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 21

- 16853

D.C. No. 2:21

- cv

- 00877

- GMS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Jeane Gregory appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

for failure to comply with a court order her diversity action alleging claims arising

out of a probate proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 16853

review for an abuse of discretion. Pagtalunan v. Galaza , 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th

Cir. 2002)

. We affirm.

The di strict court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Gregory’s action

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) after Gregory failed to file an

amended complaint as ordered

, despite being warned that failure to do so would

result in dismissal

. See id

. at 64 1

- 43 (discussing factors to consider in determining

whether to dismiss for failure to comply with a court order; this court may review

the record independently to determine if the district court abused its discretion)

.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Gregory’s motions for entry of default (Docket Entry Nos. 11, 12, 13, 14

,

and 16 ) are denied.

AFFIRMED.
§ 4.811 Determination and participation of amici. ( a ) Any interested person or organization wishing to participate as amicus curiae in the proceeding shall file a petition before the commencement of the hearing. Such petition shall concisely state the petitioner's interest in the hearing and who will represent petitioner.
( b ) The administrative law judge will grant the petition if he finds that the petitioner has an interest in the proceedings and may contribute materially to the disposition of the proceedings. The administrative law judge shall give the petitioner written notice of the decision on his petition.
( c ) An amicus curiae is not a party and may not introduce evidence at a hearing but may only participate as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) An amicus curiae may submit a written statement of position to the administrative law judge at any time prior to the beginning of a hearing, and shall serve a copy on each party. He may also file a brief or written statement on each occasion a decision is to be made or a prior decision is subject to review. His brief or written statement shall be filed and served on each party within the time limits applicable to the party whose position he deems himself to support; or if he does not deem himself to support the position of any party, within the longest time limit applicable to any party at that particular stage of the proceedings.
( e ) When all parties have completed their initial examination of a witness, any amicus curiae may request the administrative law judge to propound specific questions to the witness. The administrative law judge, in his discretion, may grant any such request if he believes the proposed additional testimony may assist materially in elucidating factual matters at issue between the parties and will not expand the issues.
Editorial Note on Part 126
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 126 appear at 72 FR 50041, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 126.605 What requirements are not available for HUBZone contracts? A contracting activity may not make a requirement available for a HUBZone contract if: ( a ) The contracting activity otherwise would fulfill that requirement through award to Federal Prison Industries, Inc. under 18 U.S.C. 4124 or 4125, or to Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act participating non-profit agencies for the blind and severely disabled, under 41 U.S.C. 46 *et seq.,* as amended; or
( b ) An 8(a) participant currently is performing the requirement through the 8(a)BD program or SBA has accepted the requirement for award through the 8(a)BD program, unless SBA has consented to release the requirement from the 8(a)BD program.
[63 FR 31908, June 11, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 29425, May 24, 2004]
#### § 431.2 Scope.

These General Regulations shall be effective on June 1, 1987, and shall apply to power generation, operation, maintenance, and replacement activities at the Boulder Canyon Project after May 31, 1987. “General Regulations for the Charges for the Sale of Power from the Boulder Canyon Project” are the subject of a separate rule, under 10 CFR part 904, by the Secretary of Energy, acting by and through the Administrator of Western. The “General Regulations for Generation and Sale of Power in Accordance with the Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act,” dated May 20, 1941, and the “General Regulations for Lease of Power,” dated April 25, 1930, terminate May 31, 1987.
### [§76. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(14), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1765]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 25, related to inclusion in gross of all income derived from mortgages made, or obligations issued, by a joint-stock land bank.
Order entered March 19, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 01084

- CV

ALFREDO SANCHEZ AND FERMIN LOPEZ , Appellant s

V.

LUIS TORRES , Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 03653

O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ March 17, 2021 motion for an extension of

time to file their brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time

to Apri l 13, 2021

.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.131 Leasing part of new construction or existing building to another business. ( a ) If the SBA financing (whether 7(a) or 504) is for the construction of a new building, a Borrower may permanently lease up to 20 percent of the Rentable Property to one or more tenants if the Borrower permanently occupies and uses no less than 60 percent of the Rentable Property, and plans to permanently occupy and use within three years some of the remaining space not immediately occupied and not permanently leased and plans to permanently occupy and use within ten years all of the remaining space not permanently leased. If the Borrower is an Eligible Passive Company which leases 100 percent of the new building's space to one or more Operating Companies, the Operating Company, or Operating Companies together, must follow the same rules set forth in this paragraph.
( b ) If the SBA financing (whether 7(a) or 504) is for the acquisition, renovation, or reconstruction of an existing building, the Borrower may permanently lease up to 49 percent of the Rentable Property if the Borrower permanently occupies and uses no less than 51 percent of the Rentable Property. If the Borrower is an Eligible Passive Company which leases 100 percent of the space of the existing building to one or more Operating Companies, the Operating Company, or Operating Companies together, must follow the same rules set forth in this paragraph.
[68 FR 51679, Aug. 28, 2003]
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Courts, Congress & the Law





Contact Us
  We the People & Our Parklands  Our nation has been shaped by innovative laws and the people who inspired, drafted, and signed them. Courthouses are grand works of architecture and places that honor the work of our legislators, lawyers, and judges. Some parks were established to commemorate laws, such as the Homestead Act of 1862. Other parks preserve the stories of the people who inspired them, such as Martin Luther King, Jr., or the places where they were upheld, such as Brown v Board of Education. Discover these stories.
 Last updated: February 5, 2019
 Tools Calendar
Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6128

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL A. SMITH, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-96-58, CA-99-135-7) Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 21, 2000 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael A. Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1999), and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Smith , Nos. CR-96-58; CA-99-135-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 1999; Dec. 14, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     Micro-Economics, Inc. September 30, 2000 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894552
<NAME>                        MICRO-ECONOMICS, INC.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000

<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .00



</TABLE>