alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 112.10 Conduct of investigations. ( a ) *Periodic compliance reviews.* SBA shall from time to time review the practices of recipients to determine whether they are complying with this part.
( b ) *Complaints.* Any person who believes himself or any specific class of individuals to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by this part may, by himself or by a representative, file with SBA a written complaint. A complaint must be filed not later than 180 days from the date of the alleged discrimination, unless the time for filing is extended by SBA.
( c ) *Investigations.* SBA will make a prompt investigation whenever a compliance review, report, complaint, or any other information indicates a possible failure to comply with this part. The investigation should include, where appropriate, a review of the pertinent practices and policies of the applicant or recipient, the circumstances under which the possible noncompliance with this part occurred, and other factors relevant to a determination as to whether the applicant or recipient has failed to comply with this part.
( d ) *Resolution of matters.* ( 1 ) If an investigation pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section indicates a failure to comply with this part, SBA will so inform the applicant or recipient and the matter will be resolved by informal means whenever possible. If it has been determined that the matter cannot be resolved by informal means, action will be taken as provided for in § 112.11.
( 2 ) If an investigation does not warrant action pursuant to paragraph (d)(1) of this section, SBA will so inform the applicant or recipient and the complainant, if any, in writing.
( e ) *Intimidatory or retaliatory acts prohibited.* No applicant or recipient or other person shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by section 601 of the Act or by this part or because he has made a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this part. The identity of complainants shall be kept confidential except to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of this part, including the conduct of any investigation, hearing, or judicial proceeding arising thereunder.
[30 FR 298, Jan. 9, 1965, as amended at 38 FR 17934, July 5, 1973]
§ 3832.42 How do I locate a tunnel site? You may locate a tunnel site by: ( a ) Erecting a substantial post, board, or monument at the face of the tunnel, which is the point where the tunnel enters cover;
( b ) Placing a location notice or certificate on the post, board, or monument that includes: ( 1 ) The names of the claimants;
( 2 ) The actual or proposed course or direction of the tunnel;
( 3 ) The height and width of the tunnel; and
( 4 ) The course and distance from the face or starting point to some permanent well-known natural objects or permanent monuments, in the same manner as required to describe a lode claim (see § 3832.12(a) and (b)); and
( c ) Placing stakes or monuments on the surface along the boundary lines of the tunnel at proper intervals as required under state law from the face of the tunnel for 3,000 feet or to the end of the tunnel, whichever is shorter.
[68 FR 61064, Oct. 24, 2003; 68 FR 74197, Dec. 23, 2003]
### §2054. Losses

For purposes of the tax imposed by section 2001, the value of the taxable estate shall be determined by deducting from the value of the gross estate losses incurred during the settlement of estates arising from fires, storms, shipwrecks, or other casualties, or from theft, when such losses are not compensated for by insurance or otherwise.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 390.)
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Old Statehouse (Hartford, CT)

The Amistad Trial began in Connecticut’s Old Statehouse in 1839.  The trials were held here for two months before a change of venue brought the trial to New Haven, CT.

During this two-month period their lawyer, Roger Sherman Baldwin developed the basis for his argument on behalf of the Africans that would lead to the U.S. Supreme Court judgment in 1841.
Old StatehouseAmistad Story Trip Ideamain Visit page

Activity FeeYes

Last updated: February 2, 2021

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Running in Death Valley

Death Valley National Park
§ 429.18 When do I have to pay the administrative costs? ( a ) Following the initial review, you will be notified in writing whether your application appears to be appropriate for further processing. At that time, Reclamation will give you an initial estimate of administrative costs required to continue processing your application.
( b ) You must pay these initial, estimated administrative costs before Reclamation can continue to process your application, unless you are granted a waiver of administrative costs under subpart F of this part. If payment is not received within 90 days after the estimate is provided to you, Reclamation may close your file. If this occurs and you later wish to proceed, you must submit both a new application and another $100 nonrefundable application fee.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Henry Coe State Park and Expedition Camps #103 and #104

ActivityHiking

Activity FeeYes

Last updated: February 1, 2018

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


     I, DAVID HOPE, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of
Auto-Q International, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certifies that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the period ended September 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





/s/  David Hope
-----------------------------
     David Hope, Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 23, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.320 Policy. Section 7(a)(11) of the Act authorizes SBA to guarantee or make direct loans to establish, preserve or strengthen small business concerns: ( a ) Located in an area having high unemployment according to the Department of Labor;
( b ) Located in an area in which a high percentage of individuals have a low income inadequate to satisfy basic family needs; and
( c ) More than 50 percent owned by low income individuals.
#### § 108.1130 Leverage fees payable by NMVC Company.

There is no fee for the issuance of Debentures by a NMVC Company.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
          Associated  Technologies and Subsidiaries September 30, 1996 financial
          statements  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference  to such
          financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000894565
<NAME>                        Associated Technologies

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         23,361
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  99,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    338,644
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,234,688
<PP&E>                                         470,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (337,407)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,367,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          437,977
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,148
<OTHER-SE>                                     927,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,367,758
<SALES>                                        248,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               248,053
<CGS>                                          136,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  136,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               862,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             300,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,901,479)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,050,468)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,901,479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.64)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the annual filing of SuperiorClean, Inc.,
a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10KSB for the period
ended February 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Aldo Rotondi, Chief Executive
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.


Date:  June 6, 2003


/s/ Aldo Rotondi
----------------------------
     Aldo Rotondi
     Chief Executive Officer
     Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Catherine McDonough, Respondent, against Flushing Hospital & Dispensary et al., Appellants, and State Insurance Fund, Respondent. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
### §7215. Offenses with respect to collected taxes

#### (a) Penalty

Any person who fails to comply with any provision of section 7512(b) shall, in addition to any other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

#### (b) Exceptions

This section shall not apply—

(1) to any person, if such person shows that there was reasonable doubt as to (A) whether the law required collection of tax, or (B) who was required by law to collect tax, and

(2) to any person, if such person shows that the failure to comply with the provisions of section 7512(b) was due to circumstances beyond his control.

For purposes of paragraph (2), a lack of funds existing immediately after the payment of wages (whether or not created by the payment of such wages) shall not be considered to be circumstances beyond the control of a person.

(Added Pub. L. 85–321, §2, Feb. 11, 1958, 72 Stat. 6; amended Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §§307(a)(15), 308(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 590, 591; Pub. L. 98–67, title I, §102(a), Aug. 5, 1983, 97 Stat. 369.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–67 repealed amendments made by Pub. L. 97–248. See 1982 Amendment note below.

1982—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–248 provided that, applicable to payments of interest, dividends, and patronage dividends paid or credited after June 30, 1983, last sentence of subsec. (b) is amended to read as follows: "For purposes of paragraph (2), a lack of funds existing immediately after the payment of wages or amounts subject to withholding under subchapter B of chapter 24 (whether or not created by the payment of such wages or amounts) shall not be considered to be circumstances beyond the control of a person." Section 102(a), (b) of Pub. L. 98–67, title I, Aug. 5, 1983, 97 Stat. 369, repealed subtitle A (§§301–308) of title III of Pub. L. 97–248 as of the close of June 30, 1983, and provided that the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 [now 1986] [this title] shall be applied and administered (subject to certain exceptions) as if such subtitle A (and the amendments made by such subtitle A) had not been enacted.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Participate in a Ranger Walk or Talk

Grand Portage National Monument
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61071-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

JOHNNIE LEE,

Plaintiff,

v.

ESA P PORTFOLIO OPERATING LESSEE, LLC, a Foreign

Limited Liability Company d/b/a EXTENDED STAY AMERICA,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION;

DISMISSING COMPLAINT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate 

Judge Strauss [DE 31] (“Report”), dated March 18, 2021. The Court notes that no objections to 

the Report have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely 

objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report are hereby adopted 

and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 

1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 

(11th Cir. 1993). 

Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of 

the Report and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the 

Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusions. Based on Plaintiff’s conduct, it appears that 

dismissal is appropriate as lesser sanctions would be inadequate. The Court will not impose 

additional sanctions, however, given Plaintiff’s indigency. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

Case 0:20-cv-61071-WPD Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/09/2021 Page 1 of 2
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report [DE 31] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED;

2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 22] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in 

part in accordance with this Order;

3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice;

4. Defendant’s request for additional sanctions is DENIED.

5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending 

motions.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 9th day of April, 2021.

Copies furnished to:

Magistrate Judge Strauss

Counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61071-WPD Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/09/2021 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto HERNANDEZ-LOZANO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41004.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 27, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, Mark Michael *372Dowd, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Brownsville, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Alberto Hernandez-Lozano (Hernandez) appeals his conviction and the 41-month sentence that was imposed for his guilty plea to a charge of being found in the United States following removal, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Hernandez’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Hernandez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *AlmendarezTorres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Hernandez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, Hernandez’s conviction is affirmed.

Hernandez asserts that his sentence must be vacated because he was sentenced pursuant to mandatory Sentencing Guidelines in violation of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). He asserts that the error in his case is structural and is insusceptible to harmless error analysis. Contrary to Hernandez’s contention, we have previously rejected this specific argument. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463 (5th Cir.2005).

Hernandez contends that the Government cannot show that the error that occurred at his sentencing was harmless. The Government concedes that Hernandez preserved his claim of error. We review Hernandez’s challenge to his sentence for harmless error under Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(a). *See Walters,*418 F.3d at 463. Nothing in the record demonstrates and the Government has not shown that the district court would not have imposed a different sentence under advisory Sentencing Guidelines. *United States v. Garza,*429 F.3d 165, 170-71 (5th Cir.2005). Accordingly, Hernandez’s sentence is vacated, and his case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 0:20-cv-60950 

HILDRED BUTLER, 

Plaintiff, 

 

vs. 

SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., 

Defendant.

 / 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Defendant, SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., gives notice of appearance of the undersigned as 

counsel, and requests that all documents and communications be served on them, as follows: 

Steven W. Marcus, Esq., of Frank, Weinberg & Black, P.L., smarcus@fwblaw.net and 

lclaus@fwblaw.net, 7805 SW 6th Court, Plantation, Florida 33324; Phone (954) 474-8000; 

Facsimile (954) 474-9850. 

Date: May 13, 2020. 

 Respectfully submitted,

 FRANK, WEINBERG & BLACK, P.L.

/s/Steven W. Marcus 

Steven W. Marcus, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 194980 

Email: smarcus@fwblaw.net

Marc A. Silverman, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 144444 

Email: msilverman@fwblaw.net 

Stephanie Deutsch, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 503584 

Email: scd@fwblaw.net 

FRANK, WEINBERG & BLACK, P.L.

7805 S.W. 6th Court 

Plantation, FL 33324 

Telephone: (954) 474-8000 

Counsel for Defendant, Spirit Airlines, Inc.

Case 0:20-cv-60950-AHS Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing was filed with the Clerk of Court by using 

CM/ECF and served on all those on the attached Service List on this 13th day of May 2020.

 

/s/Steven W. Marcus 

Steven W. Marcus, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 194980 

Marc A. Silverman, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 144444 

Stephanie Deutsch, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 503584 

SERVICE LIST

Glenn J. Holzberg, Esq. 

Louis M. Holzberg, Esq. 

Holzberg Legal 

7685 SW 104 St., Suite 220 

Miami, Florida 33156 

Phone: 305-668-6410 

Facsimile: 305-667-6161 

Email: glenn@holzberglegal.com

louis@holdberglegal.com 

Carson R. Runge, Esq. 

Brandon L. Beagley, Esq. 

Sloan Hatcher Perry Runge Robertson Smith & Jones Law Firm

P.O. Drawer 2909 

101 East Whaley Street

Longview, Texas 75601 

Telephone: (903) 757-7000 

Facsimile: (903) 757-7574 

Email: crunge@sloanfirm.com 

bbeagley@sloanfirm.com

Ron C. McCallum, Esq. 

Ron C. McCallum and Associates, PLLC 

110 Webb Ave. Ste. 150 

Dallas, TX 75205 

Telephone: (214) 702-0555 

Facsimile: (214) 594-9618 

Case 0:20-cv-60950-AHS Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §661. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–507, §3, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 860; Pub. L. 91–64, Aug. 25, 1969, 83 Stat. 105, which provided for the undistributed balance of the 1945 appropriation for certain judgments to be distributed in equal shares to tribe members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 4300.25 Does my filed application mean I will automatically receive a permit?

No. BLM issues grazing permits at its discretion. Our decisionmaking is based on resource management guidelines developed in land use plans and in consultation with other State and Federal resource management agencies.
### [§1039. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(a)(33), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–521]

Section, added Pub. L. 91–172, title IX, §910(a), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 718; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834, related to the recognition of gain on certain sales of low-income housing projects.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

For provisions that nothing in repeal by Pub. L. 101–508 be construed to affect treatment of certain transactions occurring, property acquired, or items of income, loss, deduction, or credit taken into account prior to Nov. 5, 1990, for purposes of determining liability for tax for periods ending after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 11821(b) of Pub. L. 101–508, set out as a note under section 45K of this title.