alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §9034. Entitlement of eligible candidates to payments

#### (a) In general

Every candidate who is eligible to receive payments under section 9033 is entitled to payments under section 9037 in an amount equal to the amount of each contribution received by such candidate on or after the beginning of the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year of the presidential election with respect to which such candidate is seeking nomination, or by his authorized committees, disregarding any amount of contributions from any person to the extent that the total of the amounts contributed by such person on or after the beginning of such preceding calendar year exceeds $250. For purposes of this subsection and section 9033(b), the term "contribution" means a gift of money made by a written instrument which identifies the person making the contribution by full name and mailing address, but does not include a subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money, or anything of value or anything described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of section 9032(4).

#### (b) Limitations

The total amount of payments to which a candidate is entitled under subsection (a) shall not exceed 50 percent of the expenditure limitation applicable under section 315(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971.

(Added Pub. L. 93–443, title IV, §408(c), Oct. 15, 1974, 88 Stat. 1299; amended Pub. L. 94–283, title III, §307(b), May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 501; Pub. L. 110–172, §11(a)(42)(D), Dec. 29, 2007, 121 Stat. 2488.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 315(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, referred to in subsec. (b), is classified to section 30116(b)(1)(A) of Title 52, Voting and Elections.

#### Amendments

2007—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–172 substituted "section 315(b)(1)(A)" for "section 320(b)(1)(A)".

1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–283 substituted "section 320(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971" for "section 608(c)(1)(A) of title 18, United States Code".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1974, see section 410(c)(1) of Pub. L. 93–443, set out as an Effective Date of 1974 Amendment note under section 30101 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
§ 404.9 What types of infrastructure and facilities may be included in an eligible rural water supply project? A rural water supply project may include, but is not limited to, the following types of infrastructure and facilities: ( a ) Pumps, pipes, wells, surface water intakes and other diversion, transmission, or distribution systems;
( b ) Storage tanks and small impoundments;
( c ) Water treatment facilities for potable water supplies, including desalination facilities;
( d ) Buildings necessary to house equipment and serve as a center for operations;
( e ) Power transmission and related facilities required for the rural water supply project;
( f ) Equipment and management tools for water conservation, groundwater recovery, and water reuse and recycling;
( g ) Associated features to mitigate adverse environmental consequences of a project; and
( h ) Appurtenances.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leocadio VELASQUEZ, also known as Leocadio Pecellin, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40943.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Leocadio Velasquez appeals his guilty-plea conviction of being found illegally in the United States after having previously been deported. Velasquez argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional both on their face and as applied. Velasquez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Velasquez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th. Cir.), *cert, denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Velasquez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *AlmendarezTorres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.3



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Paperweight Development Corp. (the
Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                               |  |        |  |                                                
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP.
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 31, 2004 |  |  |  |                              
|                      |  |  |  |                              
|                      |  |  |  |                               |  |        |  | /s/    DOUGLAS P. BUTH                         
|                      |  |  |  |                               |  |        |  |                                                
|                      |  |  |  |                               |  | Name:  |  | Douglas P. Buth                                
|                      |  |  |  |                               |  | Title: |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies this
Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



3
**Exhibit 32(i)**

**Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. (the “Issuer”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

|                            | **Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc.** |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                            |                          |   |
|                            |                          |   |
| Date:  March 27, 2007 | By:                           | /s/ James G. Graham |
|                            |                          |  |
|                            |                          | James G. Graham |
|                            |                          | President & Chief Executive Officer |

**Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. (the “Issuer”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

|                 | **Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc.** |
|----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                 |                          |   |
|                 |                          |   |
| Date: March 27, 2007 | By:                           | /s/ David A. Godwin |
|                 |                          |  |
|                 |                          | David A. Godwin |
|                 |                          | Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer |
|                 |                          |   |
|                      |
UM TED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOU M RN DISM CT OF FLOD A

Civll' Case Num ber:

lxmwo V tkfevn:

(write tse fun n. e of tse plain.

vs. '

: r) s,- s- zle r .: -LT-L 2.ïV.fs),-@

X rite the full nnme of tlle defendrt/s in this cmse)

FILED BY D.C ,

JU8 1 5 2022

ANGELA E. NOBLE

CLERK .U S. D4S .T cT.

s. D. OF FLA. - FT. LAUD.

COm LM NT UNDER THE CW R RIGHTS ACT, 42 U.S.C. j 1983

1. Party Inform ation

A. Plaintiff: h : m .. v. ,V r$ f 't .. $-

Ad/ess: 1-g.6- Rqih s#. * % M:.-..' ge- .ù FL . 3) I @ l

Inmateg rison No.:

Year of Birth'. tg (. X (Do % lclude day or monA purs'lnnt to Fed. R. Civ. P 5.2)

(Write yotlr name, address and prison/inmste nllmber, if apphcable)

VS.

s. oefenanot: ùês..v eieh >ht LTt

oo oial posiuon:

Defendnnt:

Oo cial Position:

Plaoe of Emplom ent: Place of Employm ent:

(Write the fall name of each defendant oO cial posiéon and place of employment. Attach a

separate page ifyou need addiûonal spaoe for addiéonal defendnnts. )

Case 1:20-cv-22454-FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 1 of 3
.#

q. Statement of Claim

Brieiy describe the facts of your case. Descdbe how each defendnnt is involvet names of other

persons involvet and dates and pl aoes. Eaoh claim should be stat ed in a separately num bered

paragraph. Please use short and plain state= nts, with sepr ately numbered parap apils indicadng

why the relief requested sholzld be granted. Do not idude legal arguM ntq or cite cases or statutes

Atfnnh addiional pages, if necessary. .

x x - ' . 

- , rv sc . 1 $?e . a.m

. - ...- . 

'' 

o tx . . , ' . vt % (. w .

. kx yt . . j. yy o j

-

m1' ' < e. h ' -1 ,, ' $ et e o J -#1 .

')â - r ct - e 7tu- s xa ce. 6 - -m - w'. t u - qm cl e r

- s 4 o fau lt1 t a. 'ls-c - -ho: o-u ïoccsscva ,.

4'ïk.. v-vs. c. q.m

i r/ v z? , ,v. qs ; ec z ,'1 % ss '- % so u s c.

'-ttvlv, - ) /.>, - $ -, )$ ./: ti,-z w Hv ..; - -o O-/JZ. ,-n- yT1gs-r> . zï-- - le-o'c:l g .

k A -' -t e , a . : -, - z . 

- ..c , I (-')L (. u

.hvts-)'-àt.'i-kôy, - $ l*xrs't.-l --f7 ovï shqhlt 2 ;- q o a.-j-ks tx ù c

m . R euef Requested

iBriefly state what you are requese g 9om the Court (what do you want the Court to do). Do not nclude legal argumentq or cite cases or statutes. Attach addiéonal pages, ifnecessary.

ôW d xf yp

Case 1:20-cv-22454-FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 2 of 3
W . JuU Dem and

Are you demane g ajury trial? x Yes +'

No

siwedtus day of l <' , 20-2 o

Signature of Plakds

I declare lmder penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tuce and correct.

Executed on;

' . --. . --. -... . --.-- .

Signature of Plaino

Case 1:20-cv-22454-FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 3 of 3
#### § 108.100 Business form.

A NMVC Company must be a newly formed for-profit entity or, subject to § 108.150, a newly formed for-profit subsidiary of an existing entity. It must be organized under State law solely for the purpose of performing the functions and conducting the activities contemplated under the Act. It may be organized as a corporation (“Corporate NMVC Company”), a limited partnership (“Partnership NMVC Company”), or a limited liability company (“LLC NMVC Company”).
### §1877. Protection of jurors

(a) Subject to the provisions of this section and title 5 of the United States Code, subchapter 1 of chapter 81, title 5, United States Code, applies to a Federal grand or petit juror, except that entitlement to disability compensation payments does not commence until the day after the date of termination of service as a juror.

(b) In administering this section with respect to a juror covered by this section—

(1) a juror is deemed to receive monthly pay at the minimum rate for grade GS–2 of the General Schedule unless his actual pay as a Government employee while serving on court leave is higher, in which case monthly pay is determined in accordance with section 8114 of title 5, United States Code, and

(2) performance of duty as a juror includes that time when a juror is (A) in attendance at court pursuant to a summons, (B) in deliberation, (C) sequestered by order of a judge, or (D) at a site, by order of the court, for the taking of a view.

(Added Pub. L. 97–463, §3(1), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2531.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Schedule, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is set out under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
##### 



Exhibit 15.1 [Ernst & Young Letterhead] November 5, 2004 The Trustee
Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-70394-01) of the Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust for the
registration of 3,568,791 trust units of beneficial interest, of our report
dated November 5, 2004 relating to the unaudited condensed interim financial
statements of the Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust that are included in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004. Very truly yours,/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 22
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Yearly report of Megola, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
for the period ending July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel Gardner, acting in the
capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Joel
      GardnerJoel
      GardnerCEO and CFOJanuary
      12, 2009
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ADELAIDE DIXON, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated 

Plaintiff,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI

 Defendant. /

 Case No.: 1:20-cv-22594-AHS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXPANSION OF 

TIME

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Expansion of Time. 

Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on July 7, 2020, and Plaintiff is required to file a response 

to said motion by July 21, 2020. Plaintiff has indicated that her response to the Motion will 

include her filing of an amended complaint.

However, there are three other pending actions that have been designated as potentially 

related to the present action. The Court has scheduled a status conference for July 29, 2020 to 

determine whether the actions should be consolidated.

Plaintiff, with Defendant’s consent, argues that good cause exists to extend the time in 

which Plaintiff is required to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss by amendment or 

otherwise until after a determination on consolidation has been made. The Court agrees.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall not be required to respond to 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss until after the Court issues an order consolidating or refusing to 

consolidate the potentially related cases. If the Court refuses to consolidate the cases, Plaintiff 

shall respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or amend her Complaint within 21 days of the 

Order refusing consolidation. If the Court orders consolidation, the Court and the parties will 

address a new consolidated briefing schedule during the July 29, 2020 status conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED on this the ____ day of July, 2020. 

______________________________

The Honorable Raag Singhal

U.S. District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-22594-AHS Document 37-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2020 Page 1 of 1
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 221

**Question 221:** Since the posting requirements are all in terms of deep dose equivalent, what requirements should be followed when posting for low energy beta radiation?

**Answer:** Unless the beta particle can deliver a dose at a tissue depth of 1 cm, the area does not require posting as a radiation area (20.1902 (a)), high radiation area (20.1902 (b)), or very high radiation area (20.1902 (c)); however, posting for airborne radioactivity area (20.1901 (d)) and for areas or rooms in which licensed material is used or stored (20.1901 (e)) needs to be considered for beta emitters. See Questions and Answers 57, 74, and 85 for more information.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1902, 10 CFR 20.1901)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004N-0161]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The   Food  and  Drug  Administration  (FDA)  is  announcing that a collection of information  entitled   “Request  for  Information   From   U.S.   Processors   That   Export   to   the  European  Community” has been approved by the Office of Management  and  Budget  (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Robbins, Office  of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration,  5600  Fishers            Lane,           Rockville,           MD           20857,  301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY  INFORMATION:

                    In  the                     **Federal  Register**                     of July 9, 2004 (69 FR 41504), the agency  announced  that the  proposed  information  collection had been submitted to OMB for review  and  clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and  a person is not required  to respond to, a collection of information unless  it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the  information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0320.  The approval expires on September  30,  2007.    A  copy  of the supporting  statement for this information collection is available on the  Internet  at                       *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: October 4, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-22765 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00422

- CV

SENSIBLE CARE HOLDIN GS, LLC, ALAN GUGGEN HEIM, AND SUSANNE GUGGENHEIM v. BURL AND MARIAN SENS
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 2 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2013

- CCV

- 61143

- 2

JUDGME NT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 25, 2018
### [§§4231 to 4234. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–44, title III, §301, June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 145]

Section 4231, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 497; Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 1019, §1, 70 Stat. 1074; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §131(a)–(c), 72 Stat. 1286, 1287; Apr. 8, 1960, Pub. L. 86–422, §1, 74 Stat. 41, imposed a tax on admissions, permanent use or lease of boxes or seats, sales outside of box office in excess of established price, sales by proprietors in excess of established price, and cabarets.

Section 4232, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 498; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §131(d), 72 Stat. 1287, defined admission, roof garden, cabaret, or other similar place, and performance for profit as used in section 4231.

Section 4233, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 498; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 792, §1, 69 Stat. 675; Apr. 16, 1958, Pub. L. 85–380, §§1–3, 72 Stat. 88; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §131(e), (f), 72 Stat. 1287; June 25, 1959, Pub. L. 86–70, §22(a), 73 Stat. 146; Sept. 21, 1959, Pub. L. 86–319, §1, 73 Stat. 590; Sept. 21, 1959, Pub. L. 86–344, §2(c), 73 Stat. 617; July 12, 1960, Pub. L. 86–624, §18(d), 74 Stat. 416, granted certain exemptions to certain charitable, educational, or religious entertainments, agricultural fairs, certain musical or dramatic performances, swimming pools, etc., home and garden tours, historic sites, certain amateur theatricals, certain amateur baseball games, rodeos, pageants, and certain benefit performances.

Section 4234, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 501, required that price of tickets be printed on face or back of such tickets and provided a penalty for selling tickets not so stamped.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to admissions, services, or uses after noon, December 31, 1965, see section 701(b)(1) of Pub. L. 89–44, set out as an Effective Date of 1965 Amendment note under section 4291 of this title.