alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, James J. Baumberger, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on suchevaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this annual report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 16, 2005
### §1924. Verification of bill of costs

Before any bill of costs is taxed, the party claiming any item of cost or disbursement shall attach thereto an affidavit, made by himself or by his duly authorized attorney or agent having knowledge of the facts, that such item is correct and has been necessarily incurred in the case and that the services for which fees have been charged were actually and necessarily performed.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 957.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §831 (R.S. §984; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §304, 42 Stat. 24).

Section as revised conforms to existing Federal Practice. See note to subdivision (d) of Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For discussion as to verification of bill of costs under existing practice, see—8 Hughes, Federal Practice, Jurisdiction and Procedure—Civil and Criminal, §6441.

Words "or allowed by the General Accounting Office" were omitted as unnecessary. That office will not allow items in a tax bill for costs against the United States unless such bill has been taxed by the court, and the court, under this section, cannot tax as costs items in an unverified bill.

Changes were made in phraseology.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61017-61018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a 
Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR, part 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicants

Longyun Worldwide Forwarding Co. Ltd., No. 66, Weixing Xincun, Laogang 
Town, Nanhui District, Shanghai, China 201302. Officers: Weifen Yuan, 
President Qualifying Individual), Jun Sun, Director.
Global Alliance Logistics (ATL) Inc., 510 Plaza Drive, Suite 2720, 
College Park, GA 30349. Officers: Philip Yu, Vice President Qualifying 
Individual), Kam L. Ng, President.

[[Page 61018]]

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants

Willmar International, Inc., 975 Navajo Drive--P.O. Box 87, Bluffton, 
OH 45817. Officer: William T. Martin, President (Qualifying 
Individual).
Pacific Hong International Corp., dba Charming Shipping Company, 308 La 
France Avenue, <greek-i>F, Alhambra, CA 91801. Officers: Honghua Wang, 
President (Qualifying Individual), Hongyu Zhang, CFO.

Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicant

Reaction, Inc., 1549 Taft Court, Seaford, NY 11873. Officers: Ahmet 
Celikay, President (Qualifying Individual).

    Dated: October 8, 2004.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-23052 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Position on Task Qualification of HP Technicians

## HPPOS-238 PDR-9111210362

See the memorandum from L. J. Cunningham to J. H. Joyner (and others) dated September 20, 1991.

Health Physics Technicians (HPTs) may independently perform specific tasks or job assignments if they meet the required prerequisites and complete the required task qualifications of their plant training programs. There are certain tasks and job assignments, however, that require in-depth knowledge and can only be performed by fully qualified ANSI technicians.

ANSI / ANS 3.1-1987, "Selection, Qualification and Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants," states that while in an initial training program an HPT may not make decisions (give authorization) or take actions affecting plant safety until they meet the performance requirements of the job position assigned. However, they may independently perform specific tasks or job assignments for which they are qualified.

HPTs are allowed to perform (without supervision) specific tasks or job assignments (i.e., radiation surveys, swipe surveys, air samples, and survey meter calibrations) if they meet the required prerequisites and complete the required task qualifications of their plant training program. However, there are certain tasks that require in-depth knowledge and can only be performed by fully qualified and experienced personnel.

The following general items are examples of areas which a non-fully qualified HPT should not be authorized to perform (without supervision):
        - The free release of radioactive materials from the restricted area.
        - Approval of effluent release permits.
        - Approval of radiation work permits.
        - Receipt and shipping of radioactive material.

Also, as examples in the area of Emergency Preparedness, a non-fully qualified HPT should not be authorized to:
        - Lead emergency search and rescue teams.
        -  Lead environmental monitoring teams.
        - Perform offsite dose assessment.

Each Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) accredited licensee training program will vary somewhat in its approach on qualifying its HPTs. However, each program should be based on a systems approach to training (SAT). The SAT should include the following key areas: how were criteria derived to select tasks to be done without supervision, and how are HPTs evaluated against these criteria to permit / authorize them to work unsupervised.

**Regulatory references:** ANSI / ANS 3.1-1987

**Subject codes:** 1.1, 1.2

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, October 18, 2017
§ 50.10 What are the required elements of a request to reestablish a formal government-to-government relationship with the United States? A request must include the following seven elements: ( a ) A written narrative with supporting documentation thoroughly describing how the Native Hawaiian community drafted the governing document, as described in § 50.11;
( b ) A written narrative with supporting documentation thoroughly describing how the Native Hawaiian community determined who could participate in ratifying the governing document, consistent with § 50.12;
( c ) The duly ratified governing document, as described in § 50.13;
( d ) A written narrative with supporting documentation thoroughly describing how the Native Hawaiian community adopted or approved the governing document in a ratification referendum, as described in § 50.14;
( e ) A written narrative with supporting documentation thoroughly describing how and when elections were conducted for government offices identified in the governing document, as described in § 50.15;
( f ) A duly enacted resolution of the governing body authorizing an officer to certify and submit to the Secretary a request seeking the reestablishment of a formal government-to-government relationship with the United States; and
( g ) A certification, signed and dated by the authorized officer, stating that the submission is the request of the governing body.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 19, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10578 Conference Calendar

LEROY HARRIS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BOBBY ARNOLD; JULITO P. UY; JOE NUNN, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CV-131

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Leroy Harris, Jr., Texas prisoner # 580009, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint against officials of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and a physician as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) 1915A, 1997e(c)(1). Harris fails to show that the district court erred when it rejected his claim that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated when he was ordered to work with an axe in the rain. See Jackson v. Cain , 864 F.2d 1235, 1246 (5th Cir. 1989). He also fails to show that medical treatment was delayed inNo. 06-10578 -2- violation of the Eighth Amendment. See Mendoza v. Lynaugh , 989 F.2d 191, 195 (5th Cir. 1993); Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). The district court’s dismissal is affirmed. This court’s affirmance of the district court’s dismissal of Harris’s complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). Harris is warned that if he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
### [§2515A. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–34, title IV, §403(c)(3)(B), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 302]

Section, added Pub. L. 95–600, title VII, §702(k)(1)(A), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2932, related to tenancies by the entirety in personal property.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to gifts made after Dec. 31, 1981, see section 403(e)(2) of Pub. L. 97–34, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 2056 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating  Partners  1992-C,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and statement of operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         277,954
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  676,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               969,139
<PP&E>                                         13,344,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,970,614)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,754,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          179,359
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,093,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,754,834
<SALES>                                        1,607,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,635,965
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,072,416<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                387,572
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            387,572
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   387,572
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
### §2103. Definition of gross estate

For the purpose of the tax imposed by section 2101, the value of the gross estate of every decedent nonresident not a citizen of the United States shall be that part of his gross estate (determined as provided in section 2031) which at the time of his death is situated in the United States.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 397.)
HomeAbout NRCNRC COVID-19 UpdateCOVID-19 Regulatory Activities for Nuclear Reactors

Nuclear Reactors COVID-19 Activities:**10 CFR Part 20** | **10 CFR Part 26** | **10 CFR 50.48** | **10 CFR 50.55a Codes & Standards | Owner's Activity Reports** | **10 CFR Part 55** | **10 CFR Part 73** | **Research & Test Reactors** | **Resident Inspectors** | **Approved Licensing Requests**

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

## Highlights

        -  The US electricity system is part of the nation's critical infrastructure. Providing regulatory flexibility that maintains safety during the COVID-19 pandemic helps to ensure safe and reliable electric power during a national emergency. 
        -  The NRC's March 28 letter contains the regulatory basis for our determination that such exemptions, if approved, will maintain reasonable assurance of safety during a defined, limited period of flexible work hour controls. 
        -  The NRC is prepared to use its existing authority in granting, upon request from individual licensees, exemptions from the work hour controls specified in 10 CFR 26.205(d)(1)-(d)(7), if alternate administrative controls are used to manage worker fatigue. 
        -  Any granted exemptions will ensure work hour controls and worker fatigue management appropriately maintain licensee flexibility in using personnel resources to most effectively manage the impacts of the COVID-19 PHE on maintaining the safe operation of nuclear power reactors. 
        -  For approved COVID-19 licensing requests, please see Approved COVID-19 Licensing Actions webpage. 

## Related Communication

        -  On November 10, 2020, the NRC issued a letter to provide guidance on the continued use of expedited processes beyond December 31, 2020 for COVID-19 related requests in seven topical areas. Enclosures to the letter address informational needs for each of the seven topical areas to facilitate the continued licensee’s use of the NRC's expedited review process, such as providing justifications for the hardships that have resulted from the COVID-19 PHE and information related to the potential cumulative effects of these exemptions. 
        -  On March 28, 2020 the NRC issued a letter to outline the process by which the NRC is prepared to grant temporary exemptions from the work hour controls specified in 10 CFR 26.205(d)(1) – (d)(7). The addendum issued April 8, 2020 provides several administrative corrections and does not affect the process outlined in the original letter. 

## Frequently Asked Questions - 10 CFR Part 26

        - COVID-19 Part 26 Work Hour Control Exemption

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, November 25, 2020
§ 107.740 Portfolio diversification (“Overline” limitation). If you are a Leveraged Licensee, the aggregate amount of financings you may provide and commitments you may issue to a Small Business and its affiliates may not, without SBA's prior written approval, exceed 10 percent of the sum of: ( a ) Your Private Capital; and
( b ) The total amount of Leverage principal (excluding any interest which may become due or accrue at any point following the issuance of Leverage) projected to be issued in the business plan that was approved by SBA at the time you were licensed.
[89 FR 3548, Jan. 19, 2024]
EXHIBIT 17

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 47-18 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/02/2021 Page 1 of 3
From: Regan, Christopher <cregan@buckleyfirm.com> 

Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 1:12 PM

To: 'braunsteinj@sec.gov' <braunsteinj@sec.gov>; Petrilla, Antony <PetrillaA@SEC.GOV>

Cc: greenbergb@gtlaw.com; Viswanatha, Veena <vviswanatha@buckleyfirm.com>

Subject: Search Terms for OIG database

Josh,

We write to follow up on the hearing before Judge Louis last Friday. We look forward to learning how many documents in the

Office of Interpretation and Guidance’s database hit on the terms “Apple” and “convertible”. We also look forward to

confirmation of whether it is possible to search for the term “convertible note,” or whether you can only search for one word

at a time.

We also ask that you run the below search terms in the database and let us know how many documents hit on each of these

terms. We understand that Judge Louis has ordered the SEC at this time to produce documents that hit on two additional

terms, and we ask that you provide this information so that we can identify the two additional terms.

Trader

Factors

Microcap

Statute

Discount

Spread

144

Hold

Advertise

Business

Penny

Invest

Investment

Conference

Please let us know if you would like to discuss. Thanks.

Chris

Christopher F. Regan

Partner

Buckley LLP

2001 M Street NW

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 47-18 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/02/2021 Page 2 of 3
Suite 500

Washington, DC 20036

T 202.349.7970

M 202.255.2943

cregan@buckleyfirm.com

www.buckleyfirm.com

Case 1:20-cv-21254-BB Document 47-18 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/02/2021 Page 3 of 3
§ 4.1353 Contents of request. The request for hearing shall include— ( a ) A clear statement of the facts entitling the one requesting the hearing to administrative relief;
( b ) An explanation of the alleged errors in OSM's preliminary finding; and
( c ) Any other relevant information.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Limberlost

Shenandoah National Park
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO: 20-80832-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS

SETH FISHMAN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

JORDAN FISHMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss 

Jordan Fishman Without Prejudice from all Counts in the Complaint, filed on January 11, 2021. 

(DE 93). Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “an action may be 

dismissed at the plaintiff’s request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper. If 

a defendant has pleaded a counterclaim before being served with the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss, 

the action may be dismissed over the defendant’s objection only if the counterclaim can remain 

pending for independent adjudication.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). “Dismissal on motion of the 

plaintiff pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) is within the sound discretion of the district court[.]” McCants 

v. Ford Motor Co., 781 F.2d 855, 857 (11th Cir. 1986) (citations omitted). “[I]n most cases a 

dismissal should be granted unless the defendant will suffer clear legal prejudice, other than the 

mere prospect of a subsequent lawsuit, as a result.” Id. at 856–57 (emphasis in original) (citations 

omitted). The “court must exercise its broad equitable discretion under Rule 41(a)(2) to weigh the 

relevant equities and do justice between the parties in each case, imposing such costs and attaching 

such conditions to the dismissal as are deemed appropriate.” Id. at 857 (citations omitted).

Case 9:20-cv-80832-DMM Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

Here, Defendant Jordan Fishman has not served a counterclaim, and counsel for Defendant 

Jordan Fishman has consented to the filing of this Motion (see DE 93 at 2). Moreover, the Motion 

represents that the Parties have settled this matter. (Id.). Accordingly, it does not appear that 

Defendant Jordan Fishman will suffer clear legal prejudice if the claims against him are dismissed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1) Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Jordan Fishman Without Prejudice from all 

Counts in the Complaint (DE 93) is GRANTED. 

(2) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Jordan Fishman are DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. 

(3) Each Party shall bear its own fees and costs.

(4) The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE Defendant Jordan Fishman as a defendant in 

this matter.

(5) Defendant Jordan Fishman’s Motion to Dismiss (DE 43) is DENIED AS MOOT.

SIGNED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 13th day of January, 2021.

Donald M. Middlebrooks

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-80832-DMM Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2021 Page 2 of 2