alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

p1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143777

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143777 COA: 305349 Washtenaw CC: 10-000143-FH ANTHONY ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 15, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Explore the Black Heritage Trail®

Boston African American National Historic Site
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-61208-CIV-ALTMAN/Hunt

SIMPLIFIED IMAGING & DIAGNOSTICS,

SIMPLIFIED IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC

d/b/a IMAGING SOLUTIONS (SIS),

Plaintiff,

vs.

PETER ROUVELAS, M.D., P.C.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

JOINT NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER TO CONDUCT SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE

Pursuant to the Court's oral order during the status conference conducted on August 13,

2020, the parties hereby advise the court that counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant met and

conferred with one another over a series of telephone calls totaling approximately ninety (90)

minutes. Both counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant spoke with their respective clients and have

exchanged offers of settlement. While the parties have not finalized terms of settlement,

negotiations continue in good faith toward a resolution of this case. Within seven (7) days, the

parties will advise the Court as to whether the case settled either by way of a Notice of Settlement

or through other notice advising of an impasse or that negotiations are still ongoing.

Respectfully submitted this 13th day of August, 2020, on behalf of both parties by:

/s/ Lance O. Leider, J.D., LL.M.

__________________________________________

LANCE O. LEIDER, J.D., LL.M.

Florida Bar No.: 96408

Primary E-mail: LLeider@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Case 0:20-cv-61208-RKA Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 1 of 2
Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

TRIAL COUNSEL/LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

GEORGE F. INDEST III, J.D., M.P.A., LL.M.

Florida Bar No.: 382426

Primary e-mail: GIndest@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

TRIAL COUNSEL/LEAD ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

THE HEALTH LAW FIRM, P.A.

1101 Douglas Avenue, Suite 1000

Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714

Telephone: (407) 331-6620

Telefax: (407) 331-3030

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

PETER ROUVELAS, M.D., P.C.

LOL

S:\2600-2699\2670\001\410-Pleadings-Drafts & Finals\Ntc of Compliance.wpd

- 2 -

Case 0:20-cv-61208-RKA Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 2 of 2
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hike Hidden Valley Trail

Joshua Tree National Park
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-80484-CIV-SMITH

LAURA LOOMER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [DE 20], 

filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Defendant has not yet 

answered or filed a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

2. All pending motions not otherwise ruled upon are DENIED as moot.

3. This case is CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 22nd day of April, 2020.

________________________________

RODNEY SMITH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: All counsel of record

Case 9:20-cv-80484-RS Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2020 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60149-60150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22629]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Meeting, Notice of Vote, Explanation of Action Closing 
Meeting and List of Persons to Attend

September 30, 2004.
    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to section 
3(a) of the Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409), 5 U.S.C. 
552b:

Agency Holding Meeting: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Date and Time: October 6, 2004. (Within a relatively short time after 
the Commission's open meeting on October 6.)

Place: Room 3M 4A/B, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Non-Public Investigations and Inquiries, 
Enforcement Related Matters, and Security of Regulated Facilities.

Contact Person for More Information: Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. 
Telephone (202) 502-8400.
    Chairman Wood and Commissioners Brownell, Kelliher, and Kelly voted 
that agency business requires the holding of a closed meeting on less 
than the seven days' notice required by the Government in the Sunshine 
Act. The certification of the General Counsel explaining the action 
closing the meeting is available for public inspection in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room at 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    The Chairman and the Commissioners, their assistants, the 
Commission's Secretary and her assistant, the General Counsel and 
members of her staff, and a stenographer are expected to attend the 
meeting. Other staff members from the Commission's program offices who 
will

[[Page 60150]]

advise the Commissioners in the matters discussed will also be present.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-22629 Filed 10-4-04; 4:23 pm]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Rule 203 203 - 1 April 17, 1997

RULE 203. TRANSFER. (Adopted 10/18/1971, revised 5/1/1972, readopted 10/23/1978, revised

4/17/1997) A. Applicability This Rule shall apply to any person transferring operation or ownership of permitted equipment. B. Exemptions None. C. Definitions See Rule 102 for definitions. D. Requirements 1. Transfer of Permits An Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate shall not be transferable, whether by operation of law or otherwise, either from one location to another, or from one piece of equipment to another, except for those items specifically noted on the permit as being portable and/or relocatable. Any application to transfer a permit from one permit holder to another shall be accompanied by a filing fee as specified in Rule 210, Schedule F. A change in business name only is not a transfer and shall not be assessed a fee. An application for the transfer of ownership only shall constitute a temporary Permit to Operate if authorized by Health and Safety Code Section 42301(f). The Control Officer shall approve an application for the transfer of a permit if all of the following requirements are met:
a. the article, machine, equipment, or contrivance subject to the permit is in compliance with all applicable orders, rules, and regulations of the District, Air Resources Board and the Environmental Protection Agency; b. a written agreement or other written proof of transfer of ownership deemed sufficient by the Control Officer which specifies the date of ownership transfer has been submitted to the District;
c. the permit has been reviewed by the District to determine that permit conditions are adequate to ensure compliance with, and enforceability of, District rules and regulations applicable to the article, machine or contrivance for which the permit was issued; d. where D(1)(c) has not been met, the Control Officer shall require that the permit be revised to specify the permit conditions necessary in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations; and
e. all fees associated with the permit have been paid.

2. An application for transfer of a permit shall be filed within 30 days of change of ownership or operator.Rule 203 203 -2 April 17, 1997
### §755. Rules for allocation of basis

#### (a) General rule

Any increase or decrease in the adjusted basis of partnership property under section 734(b) (relating to the optional adjustment to the basis of undistributed partnership property) or section 743(b) (relating to the optional adjustment to the basis of partnership property in the case of a transfer of an interest in a partnership) shall, except as provided in subsection (b), be allocated—

(1) in a manner which has the effect of reducing the difference between the fair market value and the adjusted basis of partnership properties, or

(2) in any other manner permitted by regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

#### (b) Special rule

In applying the allocation rules provided in subsection (a), increases or decreases in the adjusted basis of partnership property arising from a distribution of, or a transfer of an interest attributable to, property consisting of—

(1) capital assets and property described in section 1231(b), or

(2) any other property of the partnership,

shall be allocated to partnership property of a like character except that the basis of any such partnership property shall not be reduced below zero. If, in the case of a distribution, the adjustment to basis of property described in paragraph (1) or (2) is prevented by the absence of such property or by insufficient adjusted basis for such property, such adjustment shall be applied to subsequently acquired property of a like character in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

#### (c) No allocation of basis decrease to stock of corporate partner

In making an allocation under subsection (a) of any decrease in the adjusted basis of partnership property under section 734(b)—

(1) no allocation may be made to stock in a corporation (or any person related (within the meaning of sections 267(b) and 707(b)(1)) to such corporation) which is a partner in the partnership, and

(2) any amount not allocable to stock by reason of paragraph (1) shall be allocated under subsection (a) to other partnership property.

Gain shall be recognized to the partnership to the extent that the amount required to be allocated under paragraph (2) to other partnership property exceeds the aggregate adjusted basis of such other property immediately before the allocation required by paragraph (2).

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 252; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §834(a), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1592.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–357 added subsec. (c).

1976—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2004 Amendment

Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §834(b), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1592, provided that: "The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to distributions after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 22, 2004]."
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 50

Mark Allen Rogers, Petitioner and Appellant

v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20210260

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Todd L. Cresap , Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam

. Kiara C. Kraus

- Parr, Grand Forks, ND , for petitioner and appellant.

C hristopher W. Nelson, Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, ND , for respondent and appellee.1 Rogers v. State No. 20210260
Per Curiam

. [¶1] Mark Allen Rogers appeals from a district court order denying his petition for postconviction relief. Rogers sought to withdraw his guilty plea, claiming his trial counsel was ineffective and there was an insufficie nt factual basis for his guilty plea. The court denied Rogers’ petition for postconviction relief. We conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding Rogers failed to meet his burden to prove ineffective assistance of counsel and in denying Roge rs’ petition for postconviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Norman G. Anderson, S.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Norman G. Anderson, S.J., sitting in place of McEvers , J., disqualified.
**Subsidiaries      List**

| **Entity                Name**                                   |   | **Jurisdiction                of Incorporation or Formation** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |   |                                                          |
| Billion                Electronic Co., Ltd                       |   | British                Virgin Islands                         |
|                                                             |   |                                                          |
| Shenzhen                E'Jenie Technology Development Co., Ltd. |   | Peoples                Republic of China                      |
|                                                             |   |                                                          |
| Galaxy                View International Ltd.                    |   | British                Virgin Islands                         |
|                                                             |   |                                                          |
| Sono                Digital Electronic Technologies Co., Ltd.    |   | Peoples                Republic of China                      |

----
### §87. Alcohol and biodiesel fuels credits

Gross income includes—

(1) the amount of the alcohol fuel credit determined with respect to the taxpayer for the taxable year under section 40(a),

(2) the biodiesel fuels credit determined with respect to the taxpayer for the taxable year under section 40A(a), and

(3) the sustainable aviation fuel credit determined with respect to the taxpayer for the taxable year under section 40B(a).

(Added Pub. L. 96–223, title II, §232(c)(1), Apr. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 276, §86; renumbered §87, Pub. L. 98–21, title I, §121(a), Apr. 20, 1983, 97 Stat. 80; amended Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §474(r)(3), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 839; Pub. L. 108–357, title III, §302(c)(1)(A), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1465; Pub. L. 117–169, title I, §13203(e), Aug. 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Par. (3). Pub. L. 117–169 added par. (3).

2004—Pub. L. 108–357 amended section catchline and text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Gross income includes the amount of the alcohol fuel credit determined with respect to the taxpayer for the taxable year under section 40(a)."

1984—Pub. L. 98–369 amended section generally, substituting "the amount of the alcohol fuel credit determined with respect to the taxpayer for the taxable year under section 40(a)" for "an amount equal to the amount of the credit allowable to the taxpayer under section 44E for the taxable year (determined without regard to subsection (e) thereof)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2022 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–169 applicable to fuel sold or used after Dec. 31, 2022, see section 13203(f) of Pub. L. 117–169, set out as an Effective Date note under section 40B of this title.

#### Effective Date of 2004 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–357 applicable to fuel produced, and sold or used, after Dec. 31, 2004, in taxable years ending after such date, see section 302(d) of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as a note under section 38 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–369 applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1983, and to carrybacks from such years, see section 475(a) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 21 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to sales or uses after Sept. 30, 1980, in taxable years ending after such date, see section 232(h)(1) of Pub. L. 96–223, set out as a note under section 40 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.1715 Seller's Pool Loan liquidation.

Subject to § 120.1718 of this subpart J, the Seller must liquidate and conduct debt collection litigation for Seller's Pool Loan in a prompt, cost-effective and commercially reasonable manner, consistent with prudent lending standards, in accordance with applicable Program Rules and Regulations, and with SBA approval of a liquidation plan and any litigation plan, and any amendment of either such a plan, if applicable.
### §5356. Application

The application required by this part shall disclose, as regulations issued by the Secretary shall provide, such information as may be necessary to enable the Secretary to determine the location and extent of the premises, the type of operations to be conducted on such premises, and whether the operations will be in conformity with law and regulations.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1379; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5356, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 664, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.
### §6867. Presumptions where owner of large amount of cash is not identified

#### (a) General rule

If the individual who is in physical possession of cash in excess of $10,000 does not claim such cash—

(1) as his, or

(2) as belonging to another person whose identity the Secretary can readily ascertain and who acknowledges ownership of such cash,

then, for purposes of sections 6851 and 6861, it shall be presumed that such cash represents gross income of a single individual for the taxable year in which the possession occurs, and that the collection of tax will be jeopardized by delay.

#### (b) Rules for assessing

In the case of any assessment resulting from the application of subsection (a)—

(1) the entire amount of the cash shall be treated as taxable income for the taxable year in which the possession occurs,

(2) such income shall be treated as taxable at the highest rate of tax specified in section 1, and

(3) except as provided in subsection (c), the possessor of the cash shall be treated (solely with respect to such cash) as the taxpayer for purposes of chapters 63 and 64 and section 7429(a)(1).

#### (c) Effect of later substitution of true owner

If, after an assessment resulting from the application of subsection (a), such assessment is abated and replaced by an assessment against the owner of the cash, such later assessment shall be treated for purposes of all laws relating to lien, levy and collection as relating back to the date of the original assessment.

#### (d) Definitions

For purposes of this section—

#### (1) Cash

The term "cash" includes any cash equivalent.

#### (2) Cash equivalent

The term "cash equivalent" means—

(A) foreign currency,

(B) any bearer obligation, and

(C) any medium of exchange which—

(i) is of a type which has been frequently used in illegal activities, and

(ii) is specified as a cash equivalent for purposes of this part in regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

#### (3) Value of cash equivalent

Any cash equivalent shall be taken into account—

(A) in the case of a bearer obligation, at its face amount, and

(B) in the case of any other cash equivalent, at its fair market value.

(Added Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §330(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 619; amended Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1001(a)(1), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3349.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 100–647 substituted "the highest rate of tax specified in section 1" for "a 50-percent rate".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–647 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the provision of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99–514, to which such amendment relates, see section 1019(a) of Pub. L. 100–647, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §330(c), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 620, provided that: "The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) [enacting this section] shall take effect on the day after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 3, 1982]."
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Insightful Corporation for
the quarter ended June 30, 2007, I, Jeffrey E. Coombs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Insightful Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | such Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Insightful Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ JEFFREY E. COOMBSJeffrey E. CoombsPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


August 14, 2007