alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The CNO Executive Panel is to report the findings and recommendations of the Shaping the Force Study Group to the Chief of Naval Operations. The meeting will consist of discussions of policy considerations to advance efforts to shape the Navy's workforce and develop a systematic Navy Human Resources strategy. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Wednesday, October 27, 2004, from 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Chief of Naval Operations office, Room 4E540, 2000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Mark R. Miller, CNO Executive Panel, 4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311, (703) 681-4924. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), these matters relate solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the Navy. Accordingly, the Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing that the public interest requires that all sessions of the meeting be closed to the public because they will be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(2) of title 5, United States Code. 

Dated: October 4, 2004. 

J.H. Wagshul, 

Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 04-22710 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### Jessie C. Whitney, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Emma F. Brenack and Richard G. Brenack, Appellants, and Another, Defendant.

Judgment of the County Court of Kings county affirmed by default, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
National Park Service 

U.S. Department of the Interior

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve 

Skookum Volcano Trail 

Access: The trail leaves the Nabesna Road at mile 36.8. 

Distance: 2.5 miles to a high pass. Although the trail doesn’t 

continue, one could continue over the pass and complete a 

loop back to the parking area which adds another 3 miles. The 

return loop requires difcult walking through a steep, rocky 

streambed. 

Time: 2-4 hours round-trip 

Maps: USGS Quadrangle Maps—Nabesna B-5, 1:63,360 

Difculty: Moderate. From the beginning elevation of 3,000’, it rises to an elevation of 5,800’. 

Highlights: Roadside access, wildlife, spectacular scenery, alpine plants, volcanic geology. This trail leads 

through an extinct, deeply eroded volcanic system and provides an opportunity to examine picturesque 

volcanic geology. Erosion has exposed dramatic examples of rhyolite and dacite domes, andesite lava fows, 

vents, and many erosion-resistant dikes. 

Route: From the trailhead, the trail leads up an alluvial fan, through white spruce forest and alder for 

approximately 0.8 mile. The trail surface is gravel/cobble and dry. From this point, the route enters a creek 

bed and hikers will need to make shallow creek crossings. Be aware that the level of the creek fuctuates 

dramatically, depending on seasonal rains, temperature, and time of year. Your feet will probably get wet so 

you may want to bring sandals or extra shoes that can get wet. There may or may not be sufcient rocks or 

logs to step on. Do not cross the creek in bare feet - appropriate footwear is necessary. 

After about one mile from the trailhead, the creek splits to the left. Follow the drainage that splits to the left, 

which heads to the pass. Because of fragile alpine tundra plants, the last section of trail is not constructed or 

maintained. 

Enjoy the panoramic views while searching for Dall sheep and arctic ground squirrels on surrounding 

hillsides. From the pass, hikers can explore the alpine tundra, retrace their route back to the trailhead, or 

follow an unmarked cobble creek bed (rough walking) to the south which eventually meets the Nabesna 

Road at a turnout at mile 38.3. Once back at the road, you are 1.4 miles from the main trailhead. Turn left 

on the road to walk back to the trailhead. 

Hazards: Take the necessary precautions of hiking in bear country. 

Notes: The trail may not be clearly marked, as it crosses a creek several times and may contain washouts. 

Watch for cairns, or small piles of stacked rocks, to mark the way. However, due to washouts these cairns 

may not be there. You should have the ability to read and follow the map without relying on rock cairns to 

mark the way. 

Revised 3/2015 EXPERIENCE YOUR AMERICATM 
Skookum Volcano Trail & Route 

EXPERIENCE YOUR AMERICATM
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insightful Corporation for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008, I, Jeffrey E. Coombs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Insightful Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | such Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Insightful Corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ JEFFREY E. COOMBSJeffrey E. CoombsPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


August 14, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case Number: 20-22600-CIV-MORENO

GRAYLIN SHARROD KELLY, JR., 

Movant,

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

_________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

AND AND DISMISSING CASE AS DUPLICATIVE

THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable Lisette M. Reid, United States Magistrate 

Judge, for a Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, 

Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody, filed on June 23, 2020. The 

Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (D.E. 5) on August 6, 2020. The Court has 

reviewed the entire file and record. The Court has made a de novo review of the issues presented 

in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The Court notes that no objections have 

been filed and the time for doing so has now passed. Being otherwise fully advised in the premises, 

it is 

ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Reid’s Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED 

and ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is

ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED as duplicative of Case No. 20-22581-CIVMORENO, which is currently pending before the Court.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 26th of August 2020.

______________________________________

FEDERICO A. MORENO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-22600-FAM Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020 Page 1 of 3
2

Copies furnished to:

United States Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid

Counsel of Record

Graylin Sharrod Kelly Jr.

99947-004 

Administrative United States Penitentiary 

Inmate Mail/Parcels 

PO Box 1002 

Thomson, IL 61285 

PRO SE

Case 1:20-cv-22600-FAM Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:20-cv-22600-FAM Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020 Page 3 of 3
### §1442a. Members of armed forces sued or prosecuted

A civil or criminal prosecution in a court of a State of the United States against a member of the armed forces of the United States on account of an act done under color of his office or status, or in respect to which he claims any right, title, or authority under a law of the United States respecting the armed forces thereof, or under the law of war, may at any time before the trial or final hearing thereof be removed for trial into the district court of the United States for the district where it is pending in the manner prescribed by law, and it shall thereupon be entered on the docket of the district court, which shall proceed as if the cause had been originally commenced therein and shall have full power to hear and determine the cause.

(Added Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §19(a), 70A Stat. 626.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Derivation

Section was from the Uniform Code of Military Justice, act May 5, 1950, ch. 169, §9, 64 Stat. 146, which was based on Article 117, Articles of War, act June 4, 1920, ch. 227, subch. II, §1, 41 Stat. 811, as amended June 24, 1948, ch. 625, title II, §242, 62 Stat. 642.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-80866-RAR

LUIS SANCHEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

PREMIER GENERAL SERVICES, INC. and

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER REQUIRING REMOVAL STATUS REPORT

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon sua sponte review of the record. Counsel for 

the removing party is directed to file and serve a Removal Status Report no later than June 16, 

2020. Failure to file a timely Removal Status Report shall be grounds for remand. In addition to 

the Removal Status Report, counsel for the removing party must file copies of all records in the 

state court proceedings by the aforementioned date.

The Removal Status Report shall contain the following:

(1) A plain statement of the nature of the claim and any counterclaim, cross-claim or 

third-party claim made in state or federal court, including the amount of damages claimed 

and any other relief sought.

(2) A plain statement of the grounds for removal and a listing of all parties to the action, 

including parties to any third-party claim. The statement must explain the grounds for this 

Court’s subject matter jurisdiction with reference to the complaint. 

(3) A list of all pending motions.

(4) In cases where there are more than one Defendant, a brief statement explaining 

whether or not all Defendants have joined in or consented to the notice of removal.

Case 9:20-cv-80866-RAR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

(5) A statement regarding whether Defendant has removed the action within thirty (30) 

days after the receipt by Defendant, through service or otherwise, of a copy of the initial 

pleading setting forth the claim for relief upon which the action or proceeding is based, or 

within thirty (30) days after service of summons upon Defendant, if such initial pleading 

has then been filed in court and is not required to be served on Defendant in the action. 

If the removing party has provided some or all the information requested above, briefly 

summarize the information requested and direct the Court to the location of the information in the 

record. Failure of the removing party or parties to timely provide in the Removal Status Report

the information requested above, or information required pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1446(a), may 

result in remand of the action.

Counsel for the removing party shall provide copies of this Notice to all concerned parties.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 3

rd day of June, 2020.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:20-cv-80866-RAR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1




                                        EXHIBIT 11.1
                                MDL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
                          COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED         SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                              SEPTEMBER 30,             SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              -------------             -------------
                                                          1996         1995          1996         1995
                                                          ----         ----          ----         ----
<S>                                                       <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>   
Net income                                                $1,096       $1,787       $2,828       $2,846
                                                          ======       ======       ======       ======

Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding                                             8,693        8,285        8,640        8,259

Assuming exercise of stock options reduced by the
   number of shares which could have been purchased
   with the proceeds from exercise of such options           994          894        1,021          798
                                                          ------       ------       ------       ------

Shares used in computing net income per
   common share                                            9,687        9,179        9,661        9,057
                                                          ======       ======       ======       ======

Net income per common share                               $ 0.11       $ 0.19       $ 0.29       $ 0.31
                                                          ======       ======       ======       ======
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7404

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DENNIS ALLEN BREWER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CR-91-342-A, CA-97-1089-AM)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 8, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Allen Brewer, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Fay Wright, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Allen Brewer seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Brewer, Nos. CR-91-

342-A; CA-97-1089-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 31, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Timothy Kelley Millet, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Trust Certificates
(TRUCs), Series 2001-3 Trust;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and the trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as trustee, and its officers and agents.



                                     By:  /s/ Timothy Kelley Millet
                                          -----------------------------------
                                     Name:  Timothy Kelley Millet
                                     Title: Chief Executive Officer/President
                                            Bear Stearns Depositor Inc.
                                     Date:  March 26, 2004


                                       6
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-19-00359-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 48th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 048-285747-16

Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

ERIC MAHROUM, Appellant

V.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION AND TEXAS HOUSE OF 

REPRESENTATIVES, Appellees
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On October 29, 2019, we notified appellant that the trial-court clerk 

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellant has

not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant arranged to pay for the clerk’s 

record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 

44.3.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, 

we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 

42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: November 27, 2019
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Larry Blakney, Plaintiff,

v.

Catherine Brewton and others,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-cv-22034-Civ-Scola

Order Dismissing Case

On August 25, 2020, the Court dismissed Plaintiff Larry Blakney’s pro se 

second amended complaint because he once again failed to state a claim upon 

which relief may be granted. (Order, ECF No. 15.) In doing so, the Court advised 

Blakney that if he wanted to pursue his claims, he must file a third amended 

complaint and an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Id. at 4.) The 

Court cautioned, however, that if Blakney failed to comply with the Court’s order 

by September 14, 2020, his case would be dismissed with prejudice. (Id.) That 

date has come and gone and Blakney has failed to comply.

A district court may dismiss a case, on its own initiative, if a plaintiff 

abandons its prosecution of the suit. Compare Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) with Link v. 

Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962). Courts are vested with this 

inherent power “to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and 

expeditious disposition of cases” and “to clear their calendars of cases that have 

remained dormant because of the inaction or dilatoriness of the parties seeking 

relief.” Link, 370 U.S. 630–31.

The Court finds Blakney has abandoned his prosecution of this matter. 

The Court, thus, dismisses this case with prejudice, and directs the Clerk of 

the Court to close the matter. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to the Plaintiff at the 

address indicated on the docket.

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, on September 22, 2020.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-22034-RNS Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2020 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit A 

Case 1:20-cv-22471-DPG Document 52-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2020 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:20-cv-22471-DPG Document 52-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2020 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:20-cv-22471-DPG Document 52-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2020 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:20-cv-22471-DPG Document 52-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2020 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:20-cv-22471-DPG Document 52-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2020 Page 5 of 5
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Saddle Rock Trail Geology Hiking Tour

Scotts Bluff National Monument
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Public Law 95-541. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 9, 2004 and September 2, 2004, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit application received. Permits were issued on October 5, 2004 to:                

Scott Borg—Permit No. 2005-011.

Bruce C. Sidell—Permit No. 2005-015.

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Permit Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-22972 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M