alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4.1051 What are the requirements for the ALJ's recommended decision? ( a ) *Timing.* The ALJ must issue a recommended decision within 180 days after issuance of the docketing notice under § 4.1020(a)(3), unless the ALJ issues an order finding good cause to issue the recommended decision at a later date.
( b ) *Content.* ( 1 ) The recommended decision must contain all of the following: ( i ) Recommended findings of fact on all disputed issues of material fact;
( ii ) Recommended conclusions of law: ( A ) Necessary to make the findings of fact (such as rulings on materiality and on the admissibility of evidence); and
( B ) As to whether the applicable criteria for Federal acknowledgment have been met; and
( iii ) Reasons for the findings and conclusions.
( 2 ) The ALJ may adopt any of the findings of fact proposed by one or more of the parties.
( c ) *Service.* Promptly after issuing a recommended decision, the ALJ must: ( 1 ) Serve the recommended decision on each party to the hearing process; and
( 2 ) Forward the complete hearing record to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, including the recommended decision.
#### § 4.404 Consolidation.

If the facts or legal issues in two or more appeals pending before the Board are the same or similar, the Board may consolidate the appeals, either on motion by a party or at the initiative of the Board.

[75 FR 64665, Oct. 20, 2010]
§ 5500.0-5 Definitions. Except as the context may otherwise indicate, as the terms are used in parts 5500 through 5520 of this chapter and in contracts issued thereunder: ( a ) *Bureau* means the Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior.
( b ) *Director* means the Director of the Bureau of Land Management.
( c ) *Authorized Officer* means an employee of the Bureau of Land Management, to whom has been delegated the authority to take action.
( d ) *O. and C. Lands* means the Revested Oregon and California Railroad and Reconveyed Coos Bay Wagon Road Grant Lands and other lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management under the provisions of the Act of August 28, 1937 (50 Stat. 874).
( e ) *Public Lands* means any land and interest in land owned by the United States within the several States and administered by the Secretary of the Interior through the Bureau of Land Management, including O. and C. Lands, without regard to how the United States acquired ownership, except: ( 1 ) Lands located on the Outer Continental Shelf; and
( 2 ) Lands held for the benefit of Indians, Aleuts, and Eskimos.
( f ) *Timber* means standing trees, downed trees or logs which are capable of being measured in board feet.
( g ) *Other vegetative resources* means all vegetative material which cannot be measured in units of board feet of timber.
[35 FR 9789, June 13, 1970, as amended at 85 FR 82375, Dec. 18, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Resource Advisory Committee Meeting, Sundance, WY

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Black Hills 
National Forests' Crook County Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
Monday, October 18, 2004 in Sundance, Wyoming for a business meeting. 
The meeting is open to the public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting on October 18, begins 
at 6:30 p.m., at the U.S. Forest Service, Bearlodge Ranger District 
office, 121 South 21st Street, Sundance, Wyoming. Agenda topics will 
include: Updates on previously funded projects and a review of new 
project proposals. A public forum will begin at 8:30 p.m. (MT).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Kozel, Bearlodge District Ranger 
and Designated Federal Officer, at (307) 283-1361.

    Dated: October 4, 2004.
Julie Wheeler
Acting Bearlodge District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 04-22917 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-4872

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JUAN JARAMILLO-JIMENEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, 

District Judge. (1:11-cr-00342-CCE-1)

Submitted: April 28, 2014 Decided: May 13, 2014

Before KING, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen III, Federal Public Defender, Mireille P. Clough, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Winston-Salem, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, 

Angela H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Juan Jaramillo-Jimenez appeals the district court’s 

judgment and commitment order entered after his supervised 

release was revoked. The court sentenced Jaramillo-Jimenez to 

serve eighteen months’ imprisonment consecutive to the sentence 

he was serving at the time. He contends that the sentence was 

substantively unreasonable. Finding no error, we affirm.

The district court has broad discretion when imposing 

a sentence upon revoking a defendant’s supervised release. 

United States v. Webb, 738 F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 2013). We

will affirm the sentence if it is within the statutory maximum 

and is not “plainly unreasonable.” United States v. Crudup, 461 

F.3d 433, 438 (4th Cir. 2006). We first consider whether the 

sentence is procedurally or substantively unreasonable. Webb, 

738 F.3d at 640. A revocation sentence is procedurally 

reasonable if the district court considered the advisory policy 

statement range and the § 3553(a) factors applicable to 

supervised release revocation. Crudup, 461 F.3d at 438-40. A 

sentence is substantively reasonable if the district court 

stated a proper basis for concluding the defendant should 

receive the sentence imposed, up to the statutory maximum. Id.

at 440. Only if a sentence is found procedurally or 

substantively unreasonable will we then decide whether the 

sentence is plainly unreasonable. Id. at 439. 
3

In ordering the sentence at issue, the district court 

properly considered Jaramillo-Jimenez unwillingness to abide by 

the terms of supervision, see United States v. Moulden, 478 F.3d 

652, 655 (4th Cir. 2007), and the need to deter further 

violations of supervised release. See Webb, 738 F.3d at 642. 

Because the court stated a proper basis for the consecutive 

eighteen month sentence, we find no error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment 

and commitment order. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Waterfowl breeding population survey for South Dakota and North Dakota[electronic resource].**** 
SuDoc:I 49.100/5:
ItemNumber: 0614-C-01 (online)
CGPsystem Number: 000579908
 
1993
2001
2003
2004
2005
 **
### [§386. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1006(e)(8)(A), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3401]

Section, added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §75(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 594; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1805(c)(1), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2810, related to transfers of partnership and trust interests by corporations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the provision of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99–514, to which such amendment relates, see section 1019(a) of Pub. L. 100–647, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 1 of this title.
### §7213A. Unauthorized inspection of returns or return information

#### (a) Prohibitions

#### (1) Federal employees and other persons

It shall be unlawful for—

(A) any officer or employee of the United States, or

(B) any person described in subsection (l)(18) or (n) of section 6103 or an officer or employee of any such person,

willfully to inspect, except as authorized in this title, any return or return information.

#### (2) State and other employees

It shall be unlawful for any person (not described in paragraph (1)) willfully to inspect, except as authorized in this title, any return or return information acquired by such person or another person under a provision of section 6103 referred to in section 7213(a)(2) or under section 6104(c).

#### (b) Penalty

#### (1) In general

Any violation of subsection (a) shall be punishable upon conviction by a fine in any amount not exceeding $1,000, or imprisonment of not more than 1 year, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

#### (2) Federal officers or employees

An officer or employee of the United States who is convicted of any violation of subsection (a) shall, in addition to any other punishment, be dismissed from office or discharged from employment.

#### (c) Definitions

For purposes of this section, the terms "inspect", "return", and "return information" have the respective meanings given such terms by section 6103(b).

(Added Pub. L. 105–35, §2(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1104; amended Pub. L. 107–210, div. A, title II, §202(b)(3), Aug. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 961; Pub. L. 109–280, title XII, §1224(b)(6), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 1093.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 109–280, which directed insertion of "or under section 6104(c)" after "7213(a)(2)" in subsec. (a)(2) of section 7213A, without specifying the act to be amended, was executed by making the insertion in subsec. (a)(2) of this section, which is section 7213A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

2002—Subsec. (a)(1)(B). Pub. L. 107–210 substituted "subsection (l)(18) or (n) of section 6103" for "section 6103(n)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–280 effective Aug. 17, 2006, but not applicable to requests made before such date, see section 1224(c) of Pub. L. 109–280, set out as a note under section 6103 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to violations occurring on and after Aug. 5, 1997, see section 2(c) of Pub. L. 105–35, set out as an Effective Date of 1997 Amendment note under section 7213 of this title.

#### Construction of 2002 Amendment

Nothing in amendment by Pub. L. 107–210, other than provisions relating to COBRA continuation coverage and reporting requirements, to be construed as creating new mandate on any party regarding health insurance coverage, see section 203(f) of Pub. L. 107–210, set out as a Construction note under section 35 of this title.
#### § 106.500 What is SBA's Gift authority?

This section covers SBA's Gift acceptance authority under sections 4(g), 8(b)(1)(G), 5(b)(9) and 7(k)(2) of the Small Business Act.
§ 423.23 Abandonment and impoundment of personal property. ( a ) You must not abandon personal property of any kind in or on Reclamation facilities, lands, or waterbodies.
( b ) You must not store or leave unattended personal property of any kind. ( 1 ) Unattended personal property is presumed to be abandoned: ( i ) After a period of 24 hours;
( ii ) At any time after a posted closure takes effect under subpart B of this part 423; or
( iii ) At any time for reasons of security, public safety, or resource protection.
( 2 ) If personal property is presumed abandoned, an authorized official may impound it, store it, and assess a reasonable impoundment fee.
( 3 ) The impoundment fee must be paid before the authorized official will return the impounded property to you.
( c ) An authorized official may impound or destroy unattended personal property at any time if it: ( 1 ) Interferes with safety, operation, or management of Reclamation facilities, lands, or waterbodies; or
( 2 ) Presents a threat to persons or Reclamation project resources.
( d ) An authorized official may dispose of abandoned personal property in accordance with the procedures contained in title 41 CFR and applicable Reclamation and Department of the Interior policy.
#### Samuel Segal, Respondent, v. Segal Lock & Hardware Company, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order, insofar as it grants plaintiff a bill of particulars as to items 6 and 7 and insofar as it denies defendants’ cross motion to examine plaintiff before trial as to items (a) through (z) inclusive, and production of relevant books, papers, documents and other memoranda pursuant to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act, unanimously modified by allowing defendants to examine plaintiff before trial as to all items except (1), (q), (t), (u), (v), (w), (x), (y) and (z), and as so modified affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellants. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Order, insofar as it grants plaintiff an examination before trial as to items d, e, f, g, h, q, t and u, and insofar as it modifies defendants’ demand for a bill of particulars by eliminating therefrom items 4, 6(d), (e), (f) and (k), 9(a), (b), (c) and (d), and 13(b), (c) and (d) and insofar as it directs that plaintiff’s bill of particulars be served after the completion of the examination before trial of Louis Segal, unanimously modified by requiring plaintiff to furnish in addition particulars of items 4, 6(k), 13(c) and 13(d), and as so modified affirmed. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
No. 14,464.

#### Hanson *v.*Hogan.

(101 P. [2d] 1120)

Decided March 25, 1940.

Rehearing denied April 22, 1940.

Mr. Charles E. Coughlin, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. W. A. Alexander, Mr. Cecil M. Draper, Mr. L. C. Gerding, Jr., for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed in department without written opinion, Mr. Justice Bakke, Mr, Justice Otto Bock and Mr. Justice Burke participating.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59214-59215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22172]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Mobility will meet in 
closed session on October 14-15, 2004; November 17-18, 2004; and 
December 14-15, 2004, in Arlington, VA. This task Force will identify 
the acquisition issues in improving our strategic mobility 
capabilities.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this 
meeting, the Defense Science Board Task Force will review: The part 
transport plays in our present-day military capability--the technical 
strengths and weaknesses the operational opportunities and constraints; 
the possible advantage of better alignment of current assets with those 
in production and those to be delivered in the very near future; how

[[Page 59215]]

basing and deployment strategies--CONUS-basing, prepositioning (ashore 
or afloat), and seabasing--drive our mobility effectiveness; the 
possible advantages available from new transport technologies and 
systems whose expected IOC dates are either short term ( 12 years) or, 
separately, the long term ( 25 years).
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that this Defense Science Board Task Force meeting concerns 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the 
meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: September 27, 2004
L. M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-22172 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Case 1:20-cv-22050-FAM Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2020 Page 1 of 1
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Trail Of Tears
National Historic Trail
AL, AR, GA, IL, KY, MO, NC, OK, TN


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Partners
 The National Park Service (NPS) works with federal agencies, state and local governments, organizations, tribes, and private individuals to administer the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail. Partners provide opportunities for visitors to experience the trail, to discover its story and significance, and they protect and preserve trail resources.
Current and Future Partners
Trail Association
The Trail of Tears Association is the NPS's primary nonfederal partner for the Trail. The association is a national organization dedicated to promoting, protecting, and preserving the Trail of Tears. It also seeks to raise awareness of the Trail's legacy and its stories.
Trail of Tears AssociationOther Trail Partners
Additional Major Partners****include:
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma
Eastern Band of Cherokee IndiansOther American Indian tribes removed with the Cherokee on the Trail of Tears:
Muscogee (Creek) Nation of Oklahoma
Chickasaw Nation
Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma
Seminole Nation of Oklahoma
Poarch Band of Creek Indians
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee IndiansDiscover the services the National Trails office can provide and the programs your site can participate in:

National Trails Office Assistance
Three people standing around a cluster of rocks.What We Do
Cultural resources, Design & Development, Management, Interpretation, History, Planning, Resource Info Management, Route 66, and more!
Brown sign with yellow triangle, National Historic Trail Signs
Partner with us to help travelers find the national historic trails and to help them explore our shared heritage!
Screenshot of a webpage with information on the passport program.Passport to Your National Parks
Learn more about how to involve your trail site in the NPS Passport Program.
A large metal sign sitting in front of a field of grass.Certification Program
Certification is a partnership that helps landowners protect and preserve their historic trail properties and share them with others.
 Last updated: July 20, 2023
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: National Trails Office Regions 6|7|8
Trail of Tears National Historic Trail
1100 Old Santa Fe Trail
Santa Fe,
NM
87505
 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
United States Department of the Interior

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve

Mile 106.8 Richardson Hwy. P.O. Box 439

Copper Center, AK 99573-0439

907 822 5234 Fax 907 822 3281

http://www.nps.gov/wrst

NEW PROJECT FUNDING TO ADDRESS CRITICAL FOOD SECURITY NEEDS

Mark Miller, Ecologist and Research Coordinator

(907) 302-1373 or memiller@nps.gov

Barbara Cellarius, Cultural Anthropologist and Subsistence Coordinator

(907) 822-7236 or barbara_cellarius@nps.gov

The National Park Service Alaska Region has been awarded approximately $6.2 million of Inflation 

Reduction Act funding for a project that aims to mitigate environmental uncertainties and critical

subsistence food security needs through co-stewardship arrangements with Alaska Native entities and 

funding agreements with other partners as well as research and monitoring activities focusing on key 

subsistence species. Approximately $1.2 million is allocated specifically for use by Wrangell-St. Elias, 

including $238,000 for moose and caribou monitoring, $419,000 for Copper River sockeye salmon 

research and the development of management applications, and $524,000 for projects designed to support

community food-security resilience. 

Examples of partnership activities or projects that may be funded to address food-security needs include 

(1) subsistence fish and wildlife monitoring projects and/or harvest monitoring and reporting managed 

locally with local hires; (2) projects that enhance the capacity of rural communities to engage effectively 

with federal and state regulatory programs and advocate for regulatory changes that ensure stability of 

access to subsistence foods in 

the context of changing 

patterns of fish and wildlife 

availability; (3) Indigenous 

knowledge (IK) projects for 

documenting and incorporating 

IK in management decision 

making; (4) subsistence-related 

Tribal-NPS liaison programs; 

and (5) youth and elder 

programs for transmission of 

knowledge across generations.

Park staff will be doing 

outreach to Tribal councils and 

subsistence users about project 

ideas that support food security 

resilience in their communities

during spring to fall 2024 with 

most projects starting in 2025. 

Fish wheel on Copper River near Copper Center
**Exhibit 32(ii)**

****



******PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connect with the quarterly report of Tayco Developments, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2004 to be filed with Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark V. McDonough, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
covered by the Report.

It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.



|Date:	January 13, 2005 | By: | /s/ Mark V. McDonough                      
|---------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Mark V. McDonough,

Chief Financial Officer