60196 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 194 / Thursday, October 7, 2004 / Notices 

design and licensing basis, shall also be 

evaluated to determine if the associated 

loads contribute significantly to burst or 

collapse. In the assessment of tube 

integrity, those loads that do 

significantly affect burst or collapse 

shall be determined and assessed in 

combination with the loads due to 

pressure with a safety factor of 1.2 on 

the combined primary loads and 1.0 on 

axial secondary loads. 

2. Accident-induced leakage 

performance criterion: The primary-tosecondary accident-induced leakage rate 

for any design-basis accident, other than 

a SG tube rupture, shall not exceed the 

rates assumed in the accident analysis 

for total leakage rate from all SGs and 

leakage rate from an individual SG. 

Accident-induced leakage is not to 

exceed [licensee to insert value] gallons 

per day through each SG and [licensee 

to insert value] gallons per day through 

all SGs. 

3. The operational LEAKAGE 

performance criterion is specified in 

limiting condition for operation (LCO) 

[licensee to insert reference to 

appropriate LCO. For limits currently 

greater than 150 gallons per day, the 

LCO limit should be lowered to a value 

less than or equal to 150 gallons per 

day.] 

c. SG tube repair criteria. Tubes found 

by inservice inspection to contain flaws 

with a depth equal to or exceeding 40 

percent of the nominal tube wall 

thickness shall be plugged. 

d. Provisions for SG tube inspections. 

Periodic SG tube inspections shall be 

performed. The number and portions of 

the tubes inspected and the method of 

inspection shall be performed with the 

objective of detecting flaws of any type 

(for example, volumetric flaws, axial 

and circumferential cracks) that may be 

present along the length of the tube, 

from the tube-to-tubesheet weld at the 

tube inlet to the tube-to-tubesheet weld 

at the tube outlet, and that may satisfy 

the applicable tube repair criteria. The 

tube-to-tubesheet weld is not part of the 

tube. In addition to meeting 

requirements d.1, d.2, and d.3 below, 

the inspection scope, inspection 

methods, and inspection intervals shall 

be such as to ensure that SG tube 

integrity is maintained until the next SG 

inspection. An assessment of 

degradation shall be performed to 

determine the type and location of flaws 

to which the tubes may be susceptible 

and, based on this assessment, to 

determine which inspection methods 

need to be employed and at what 

locations. 

1. Inspect 100 percent of the tubes in 

each SG during the first refueling outage 

following SG replacement. 

2. Inspect 100 percent of the tubes at 

sequential periods of [for licensees with 

thermally treated Alloy 690 tubes, insert 

‘‘144, 108, 72, and thereafter 60 effective 

full-power months;’’ for licensees with 

thermally treated Alloy 600 tubes, insert 

‘‘120, 90, and thereafter 60 effective fullpower months;’’ for licensees with millannealed Alloy 600 tubes, insert ‘‘60 

effective full-power months;’’]. The first 

sequential period shall be considered to 

begin after the first inservice inspection 

of the SGs. In addition, inspect 50 

percent of the tubes by the refueling 

outage nearest the midpoint of the 

period and the remaining 50 percent by 

the refueling outage nearest the end of 

the period. No SG shall operate for more 

than [for licensees with thermally 

treated Alloy 690 tubes, insert ‘‘72 

effective full-power months or three 

refueling outages;’’ for licensees with 

thermally treated Alloy 600 tubes, insert 

‘‘48 effective full-power months or two 

refueling outages;’’ for licensees with 

mill-annealed Alloy 600 tubes, insert 

‘‘24 effective full-power months or each 

refueling outage’’ (whichever is less)] 

without being inspected.

3. If crack indications are found in 

any SG tube, then the next inspection 

for each SG for the degradation 

mechanism that caused the crack 

indication shall not exceed 24 effective 

full-power months or one refueling 

outage (whichever is less). If definitive 

information, such as from examination 

of a pulled tube, diagnostic 

nondestructive testing, or an 

engineering evaluation indicates that a 

cracklike indication is not associated 

with a crack or cracks, then the 

indication need not be treated as a 

crack. 

e. Provisions for monitoring 

operational primary-to-secondary 

leakage. 

Steam Generator (SG) Tube Inspection 

Report 

A report shall be submitted within 

180 days of the initial entry into MODE 

4 following completion of the 

inspection. The report shall include: 

a. The scope of inspection performed 

on each SG. 

b. Active degradation mechanisms 

found. 

c. Nondestructive examination 

techniques utilized for each degradation 

mechanism. 

d. Location, orientation (if linear), and 

measured sizes (if available) of serviceinduced indications. 

e. Number of tubes plugged during the 

inspection outage for each active 

degradation mechanism. 

f. Total number and percentage of 

tubes plugged to date. 

g. The results of condition 

monitoring, including the results of tube 

pulls and in-situ testing. 

End 

Documents may be examined, and/or 

copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public 

Document Room at One White Flint 

North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 

Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available 

records will be accessible electronically 

from the Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading 

Room on the Internet at the NRC Web 

site, http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/

index.html. If you do not have access to 

ADAMS or if you have problems in 

accessing the documents in ADAMS, 

contact the NRC Public Document Room 

(PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209 

or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to 

pdr@nrc.gov.

Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 30 day 

of September, 2004.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Francis M. Costello, 

Acting Branch Chief, Reactor Operations 

Branch, Division of Inspection Program 

Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation.

[FR Doc. 04–22546 Filed 10–6–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT 

CORPORATION 

November 4, 2004, Public Hearing; 

Sunshine Act

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Thursday, 

November 4, 2004.

PLACE: Offices of the Corporation, 

Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New 

York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Hearing open to the public at 2 

p.m.

PURPOSE: Public Hearing in conjunction 

with each meeting of OPIC’s Board of 

Directors, to afford an opportunity for 

any person to present views regarding 

the activities of the Corporation.

PROCEDURES: Individuals wishing to 

address the hearing orally must provide 

advance notice to OPIC’s Corporate 

Secretary no later than 5 p.m., Monday, 

October 25, 2004. The notice must 

include the individual’s name, title, 

organization, address, and telephone 

number, and a concise summary of the 

subject matter to be presented. 

Oral presentations may not exceed ten 

(10) minutes. The time for individual 

presentations may be reduced 

proportionately, if necessary, to afford 

all participants who have submitted a 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 194 / Thursday, October 7, 2004 / Notices 60197

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

3See letter from Ellen J. Neely, Senior Vice 

President and General Counsel, CHX, to Nancy J. 

Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market 

Regulation (‘‘Division’’), Commission, dated April 

7, 2004, and the attached Form 19b–4, which 

replaced the original filing in its entirety 

(‘‘Amendment No. 1’’).

4See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49567 

(April 15, 2004), 69 FR 21591.

5See letters from Ellen J. Neely, Senior Vice 

President and General Counsel, CHX, to Nancy J. 

Sanow, Assistant Director, Division, Commission, 

dated May 10, 2004 (‘‘Amendment No. 2’’) and 

August 20, 2004 (‘‘Amendment No. 3’’). In 

Amendment No. 2, the Exchange made technical 

Continued

timely request to participate an 

opportunity to be heard. 

Participants wishing to submit a 

written statement for the record must 

submit a copy of such statement to 

OPIC’s Corporate Secretary no later than 

5 p.m., Monday, October 25, 2004. Such 

statements must be typewritten, doublespaced, and may not exceed twenty-five 

(25) pages. 

Upon receipts of the required notice, 

OPIC will prepare an agenda for the 

hearing identifying speakers, setting 

forth the subject on which each 

participant will speak, and the time 

allotted for each presentation. The 

agenda will be available at the hearing. 

A written summary of the hearing will 

be compiled, and such summary will be 

made available, upon written request to 

OPIC’s Corporate Secretary, at the cost 

of reproduction.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:

Information on the hearing may be 

obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 

336–8438, via facsimile at (202) 218–

0136, or via e-mail at cdown@opic.gov.

Dated: October 4, 2004. 

Connie M. Downs, 

OPIC Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04–22648 Filed 10–4–04; 4:49 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3210–01–M

PRESIDIO TRUST

Notice of Extension of Public 

Comment Period for the Public Health 

Service Hospital Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

SUMMARY: The Presidio Trust is 

extending the comment period from 

October 12, 2004 to November 12, 2004 

to enhance opportunities for public and 

agency participation in the National 

Environmental Policy Act process for 

the Public Health Service Hospital 

(PHSH) Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact Statement (Draft 

SEIS). 

Oral comments may be made at the 

public meeting of the Presidio Trust 

Board of Directors commencing 6:30 

p.m. on November 4, 2004, at the 

Officers’ Club, 50 Moraga Avenue, 

Presidio of San Francisco, California. 

Written comments may be sent to the 

Presidio Trust via fax ((415) 561–2790), 

e-mail (phsh@presidiotrust.gov), or U.S 

Mail (NEPA Compliance Coordinator, 

The Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, 

PO Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 

94129–0052). All comments must be 

postmarked by November 12, 2004. 

Please be aware that all written 

comments and information submitted to 

the Presidio Trust will be made 

available to the public, including, 

without limitation, any postal address, 

e-mail address, phone number or other 

information contained in each 

submission. The Draft SEIS may be 

viewed or downloaded from the Trust’s 

Web site at http://www.presidio.gov,

following the link from the Home page. 

A printed copy may be requested at no 

charge at (415) 561–5414 or 

phsh@presidiotrust.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

more information regarding this and 

other planning efforts in the Presidio, 

visit http://www.presidio.gov. Specific 

questions about this notice may be 

directed to John Pelka, NEPA 

Compliance Coordinator for the Presidio 

Trust, at (415) 561–5365.

Dated: October 1, 2004. 

Karen A. Cook, 

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 04–22559 Filed 10–6–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–4R–P

PRESIDIO TRUST

Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

SUMMARY: In accordance with § (c)(6) of 

the Presidio Trust Act, 16 U.S.C. 460bb 

note, Title I of Pub. L. 104–333, 110 

Stat. 4097, as amended, and in 

accordance with the Presidio Trust’s 

bylaws, notice is hereby given that a 

public meeting of the Presidio Trust 

Board of Directors will be held 

commencing 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, 

November 4, 2004, at the Officers’ Club, 

50 Moraga Avenue, Presidio of San 

Francisco, California. The Presidio Trust 

was created by Congress in 1996 to 

manage approximately eighty percent of 

the former U.S. Army base known as the 

Presidio, in San Francisco, California. 

The purposes of this meeting are to 

provide the Executive Director’s report 

and to receive public comment 

regarding the Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact Statement for the 

Public Health Service Hospital project. 

Accommodation: Individuals 

requiring special accommodation at this 

meeting, such as needing a sign 

language interpreter, should contact 

Mollie Matull at (415) 561–5300 prior to 

October 25, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Cook, General Counsel, the 

Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, PO 

Box 29052, San Francisco, California 

94129–0052, Telephone: (415) 561–

5300.

Dated: October 1, 2004. 

Karen A. Cook, 

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 04–22560 Filed 10–6–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–4R–P

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–50481; File No. SR–CHX–

2004–12] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order 

Approving Proposed Rule Change and 

Amendment No. 1 Thereto and Notice 

of Filing and Order Granting 

Accelerated Approval of Amendments 

No. 2 and 3 to the Proposed Rule 

Change by the Chicago Stock 

Exchange, Inc. Relating to the 

Implementation of a Fully-Automated 

Functionality for the Handling of 

Particular Orders Called CHXpress 

September 30, 2004. 

I. Introduction 

On February 20, 2004, the Chicago 

Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘CHX’’ or 

‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities 

and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 

19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act 

of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 

thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to 

amend CHX Article XX, Rule 37 to 

implement a new automated 

functionality for handling particular 

orders called CHXpress. On April 8, 

2004, the Exchange amended the 

proposed rule change.3 The proposed 

rule change, as amended by 

Amendment No. 1, was published for 

comment in the Federal Register on 

April 21, 2004.4 The Commission 

received no comments on the proposed 

rule change, as amended. On May 11, 

2004 and August 23, 2004, the Exchange 

filed Amendments No. 2 and 3 to the 

proposed rule change, respectively.5