alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United 

---

States Department of the Interior 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 

Mid-Pacific Regional Office 

2800 Cottage Way 

Sacramento, CA 95825-1898 IN REPLY REFER TO: 

MP-3400 APR I 8 ZOl3 WfR-l.IO 

All Central Valley Project Water Contractors 

Subject: Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Water Deliveries and Charges for Central Valley Project (CVP) 

Water (Action by May 15, 2013) 

Dear Water Contractor: 

Enclosed is a summary of your water deliveries and charges for the period October 1, 2011, 

through September 30, 2012 (FY 2012). The determination of each contractor's deliveries is the 

initial step in the process to prepare the FY 2012 Annual Accounting Analysis for each CVP 

irrigation and municipal and industrial contractor. 

Please review the enclosed delivery and charge information. TIrls information is based on data 

recorded in the Bureau of Reclamation Water Operations & Recordkeeping System by the 

respective area offices. On page 2 of this letter, please indicate whether the information is 

correct or not. If any discrepancies are identified, please contact the appropriate Reclamation 

area office to resolve prior to submining final comments to the Ratesetting Services Branch. 

Responses are requested by May 15, 2013. Please return page 2, in the enclosed self-addressed 

postage-paid envelope, to indicate whether the infonnation is correct or is not correct. Any 

discrepancies reported will be reviewed and the water contractor will be contacted to resolve the 

discrepancies. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Sabir Ahmad at 

916-978-5187 or via e-mail at salunad@usbr.gov. 

Sincerely, 

-, Brenda Bryant 

Regional Financial Manager 

Enclosures 
Subject: Fiscal Year 2012 Water Deliveries and Charges for Central Valley Project Water 2 

Please check the appropriate response below and return this portion of the letter to the Bureau of 

Reclamation via mail, e-mail to sahmad@usbr.gov, or via fax to 916-978-5392, no later than 

May 15,2013. 

Contractor name and contract nwnber: _--".,-_~~ ____________ _ 

(please print) 

Point of Contact: :-:-___________ _ 

Name Phone number 

______ The delivery verification spreadsheets are correct. 

______ The delivery verification spreadsheets are not correct as noted below, and I 

have contacted my area office to resolve the discrepancies. 

South-Central California Area Office Ms. Joyclyn Kelley 

phone: 559-487-5519 

e-mail: jkelley@usbr.gov 

Mr. Moses Prieto 

phone: 559-487-5043 

e-mail: mprieto@usbr.gov 

Central California Area Office Ms. Georgiana Gregory 

phone: 916-989-7172 

e-mail: ggregory@usbr.gov 

Norrhero California Area Office Ms. Natalie Wolder i 

phone: 530-934-1356 

e-mail: nwolder@usbr.gov 

Description of Discrepancies:
#### Manilla Anchor Brewing Company, Appellant, v. Raw Silk Trading Company, Impleaded with Salvatrice Castrogiovanni, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellant perfect the appeal, place the ease on the calendar for Monday, June 1,1914, and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present —Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Keith Berman, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of InstaCare Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: August 10, 2011  /s/ Keith Berman Keith Berman Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT32.2**

CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection withthe Annual Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for thefiscal year ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eapen Chacko, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Dated: July 25, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Eapen Chacko             |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                 |   | Eapen Chacko                 |
|                 |   | Vice President, Finance  and |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer      |

 

----
# WATERS AERO-MARINE, INC. PO Box 273, South Thomaston, ME 04858 (207) 596-7500 www.penobscotislandair.net Email: info@penobscotislandair.net

October 

### 29,2012
U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested

RE: Exemption# 9852A, Docket# FAA-2009-0289 To Whom ItMay Concern: The purpose of this letter is to request an extensionto Docket# FAA-2009-0289, Exemption Number 9852A from 14CFR (FAR Section)- Part; 121 Appendix J; Appendix; I. The currentexemptionwill expire on 04-30-2013.There has been no change in our operations and continue to comply with the

### DmgandAlcohol Testing Program regulations. Ifyou need additional information please contact me at (207) 596-7500 or info@penobscotislandair.net. Sincerely,
Kevin Waters Waters Aero-Marine, Inc. Director of Operations

't .:f
(No. 1121

Claimant awarded $1,150.00.)

#### Louis J. Strelitsky, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 10, 1927.*

Fees & *salaries*— when *award will he made.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court in *Blasi*v. *State, supra.*

Harry Smitz, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Merrill F. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

Louis J. Strelitsky presents a claim against the State on account of a deficiency in salary, allotted to the chief inspector *305in the Division of Private Employment Agencies, in the Department of Labor, for deputy hire, said claimant being a deputy in said service. It appears that the General Assembly in making the appropriation for the salaries in question, did not take into consideration that the law enacted contains a provision as follows: “If the deputy inspector has served or hereafter serves more than one year, $100 shall be added to his salary for each year of service until a maximum salary of $3,000 is reached, ’ ’ and that no allowance for such increase in salary is made in the law.

The Attorney General of the State of Illinois has filed a demurrer, which is sustained, as a matter of law.

George B. Arnold, Director of Labor of the State of Illinois, has recommended that this deficiency be awarded to the employee.

We accordingly award to the claimant the sum of $1,150.00.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SKYNET TELEMATICS.COM, INC. AS OF JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000894557
<NAME> SKYNET TELEMATICS.COM, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         329,662
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  242,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (22,517)
<INVENTORY>                                    467,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,742,495
<PP&E>                                         616,937
<DEPRECIATION>                               (143,732)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,588,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (1,688,498)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      (27,391)
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,525,113)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (6,588,339)
<SALES>                                        561,984
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               561,984
<CGS>                                      (1,080,424)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (2,632,312)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (18,481)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,169,233)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,169,233)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,169,233)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### St. George Trucking Corporation, Respondent, v. Board of Elections of the City of New York et al., Appellants.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Reconstruction Era





Contact Us
  Site Index
 Last updated: June 7, 2017
 Tools Calendar
Site Index
Contact Us


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION  I, Keith Berman, Principal Executive and Chief Financial Officer of instaCare Corp., certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of InstaCare Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: September 29, 2008  /s/ Keith Berman Keith Berman Chief Financial Officer and Principal Executive Officer
#### § 3598.1 Inspection of underground and surface conditions; surveying, estimating and study.

Operators/lessees shall provide means at all reasonable hours, either day or night, for the authorized officer to inspect or investigate the underground and surface conditions; to conduct surveys; to estimate the amount of ore or other methods of prospecting, exploration, testing, development, processing and handling; to determine the volumes, types, and composition of wastes generated; to determine the adequacy of measures for minimizing the amount of such wastes and the measures for treatment and disposal of such wastes; to determine reclamation procedures and progress; production records; environmental concerns; and to determine whether the operator/lessee is in compliance with established requirements.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00800

- CV

I N THE INTEREST OF E.A.R. , E.A.R., E.A.R. and E.A.R.

From the 57th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021

- PA

- 00214

Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order terminating

appellants’ parental rights is AFFIRMED. No costs of appeal are assess ed against appellants.

SIGNED June 21, 2023.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adrian Miguel GAYTON-SILVA, also known as Jose Reynoso-Carillo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40939.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Adrian Miguel Gayton-Silva (Gayton) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being an alien found in the United States unlawfully after deportation and after previously having been convicted of a felony. Gayton was sentenced to 15 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. This constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Gayton contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *316
      *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Gayton properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Gayton also argues that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release and, therefore, that this condition should be vacated. As Gayton concedes, this claim is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). Accordingly, this portion of the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Order entered March 22, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01246-CR

JOHNATHAN COOPER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 297th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1031532D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 19, 2019 motion to extend the time to file 

appellant’s brief. We GRANT IN PART the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or 

before THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
### §6751. Procedural requirements

#### (a) Computation of penalty included in notice

The Secretary shall include with each notice of penalty under this title information with respect to the name of the penalty, the section of this title under which the penalty is imposed, and a computation of the penalty.

#### (b) Approval of assessment

#### (1) In general

No penalty under this title shall be assessed unless the initial determination of such assessment is personally approved (in writing) by the immediate supervisor of the individual making such determination or such higher level official as the Secretary may designate.

#### (2) Exceptions

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to—

(A) any addition to tax under section 6651, 6654, 6655, or 6662 (but only with respect to an addition to tax by reason of paragraph (9) or (10) of subsection (b) thereof); or

(B) any other penalty automatically calculated through electronic means.

#### (c) Penalties

For purposes of this section, the term "penalty" includes any addition to tax or any additional amount.

(Added Pub. L. 105–206, title III, §3306(a), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 744; amended Pub. L. 116–260, div. EE, title II, §212(b)(3), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 3067; Pub. L. 117–328, div. T, title VI, §605(a)(2)(D), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5395.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 212(b) of div. EE of Pub. L. 116–260 amended section 63 of this title.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (b)(2)(A). Pub. L. 117–328 substituted "paragraph (9) or (10) of subsection (b)" for "subsection (b)(9)".

2020—Subsec. (b)(2)(A). Pub. L. 116–260 substituted "6655, or 6662 (but only with respect to an addition to tax by reason of subsection (b)(9) thereof)" for "or 6655".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2022 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–328 applicable to contributions made after Dec. 29, 2022, see section 605(c)(1) of Pub. L. 117–328, set out as a note under section 170 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 2020 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–260 applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2020, see section 212(d) of div. EE of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 62 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–206, title III, §3306(c), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 744, as amended by Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(7) [title III, §302(b)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–632, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this subchapter] shall apply to notices issued, and penalties assessed, after June 30, 2001. In the case of any notice of penalty issued after June 30, 2001, and before July 1, 2003, the requirements of section 6751(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be treated as met if such notice contains a telephone number at which the taxpayer can request a copy of the taxpayer's assessment and payment history with respect to such penalty."