alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22411]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, EDRN: Data Management and Coordinating Center.
    Date: November 4, 2004.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6130 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Timothy C. Meeker, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Referral and Resources Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 8088, Rockville, MD 20852, 301/594-1279.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: September 29, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22411 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### §742. Basis of transferee partner's interest

The basis of an interest in a partnership acquired other than by contribution shall be determined under part II of subchapter O (sec. 1011 and following).

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 249.)
| Name of Subsidiary                          | State of Incorporation | Ownership (%)          |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------------------|
| Global Universal Film Group, Inc.           | Nevada                 | 100%                   |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Universal Entertainment, Inc.        | Nevada                 | 100%                   |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Universal Pictures, Inc.             | Canada                 | 30%                    |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Film Partners I, LLC.                | Florida                | 100% (Managing Member) |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Universal Film Finance, LLC.         | Louisiana              | 100% (Managing Member) |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Universal Film Productions, LLC.     | Louisiana              | 100% (Managing Member) |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Universal Mavericks in Toyland, LLC. | Louisiana              | 100% (Managing Member) |
#### § 47.15 What laws apply to exchanges made under this part?

(a) The Chairman may only exchange land under the authority of the HHCA in conformity with the HHLRA.

(b) When the Chairman makes any land exchange, the following laws and regulations constitute a partial list of applicable laws and regulations:

| Legislation or regulation | Citation |
| --- | --- |
| (1) The National Historic Preservation Act, 1966 | 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq. |
| (2) Implementing regulations for the National Historic Preservation Act | 36 CFR part 800. |
| (3) Section 3 of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) | 25 U.S.C. 3002. |
| (4) Implementing regulations for the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act | 43 CFR part 10. |
| (5) The National Environmental Policy Act, 1969 (NEPA) | 42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq. |
| (6) Implementing regulations for NEPA | 40 CFR parts 1500-1508; 43 CFR part 46. |
| (7) The State of Hawai'i Admission Act | 73 Stat. 4. |
| (8) Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, as amended | 42 Stat. 108. |
| (9) Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act, 1995 | 109 Stat. 537. |
| (10) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) | 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. |
| (11) Implementing regulations for CERCLA | 40 CFR part 312. |

No new legal rights or obligations are created through listing applicable laws and regulatory provisions in this section.
(No. 1098

Claimant awarded $350.00.)

#### John R. Christian, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 29, 1927.*

Respondeat *superior*— property *damage. When award may he made- to State employee.*While the State is not liable to claimant for injuries sustained by him while in the discharge of his duty, yet as a matter of equity and good conscience ah award may be made to him for damages to his property used by him in the course of his employment.

Benj. F. Cassiday, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant was employed by the State of Illinois on the 19th day of August, 1925, mowing grass and weeds along the right of way of the durable hard surface road on Route No. 4 between Elkhart and Broadwell in the county of Logan and State of Illinois, and while thus employed under the orders of superintendents, a patrolman, Luther Arney, of the Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways, was collided with from the rear by an Overland sedan automobile bearing Illinois 1925 license, purported to be owned by one J. W. Finney, of Bluffs, Illinois, and as the result of .such accident the claimant alleges that he received two severe wounds on- the head, cut down to the skull, severe abra*342sions and bruises on back. The mules driven by claimant were knocked down and injured about the knees and hip- The mower in which claimant was riding was completely destroyed and the harness damaged beyond repair, all of which is as alleged by claimant.

It appears that claimant was injured while acting as au employee of the State of Illinois, and, while there is no lega] liability, it has been the practice of this court to follow the Workmen’s Compensation Act in dealing with the employees of the State. The Attorney General of the State comes and files a demurrer, which, as a matter of law, is sustained.

It would appear to the court from the records in this case that the man driving the car that caused the injury should respond to claimant in the matter of property damaged and bear in mind the claimant’s personal injuries, time' lost, etc.

However, it would appear from all of the facts in the case and the matter of equity and good conscience, the claimant should recover a reasonable allowance for property damages.

Therefore, it is recommended by the court that the claimant be allowed the sum of $350.00.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Devonian and Mississippian rocks of central Arizona

#### Professional Paper 233-D

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp233D 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:16
#### ADKINS *v.*CRAWFORD COUNTY.

Beck, J. The court below erred in sustaining a general demurrer to the petition in a suit brought against a county, wherein it was alleged by the plaintiff that she was the owner of certain lands lying within the county referred to, and that the commissioners of roads and revenues of said county had cut a public road through her land and1 had taken her land for the public use without her consent, and, by the manner of cutting said road, had caused large quantities of rainwater to be diverted on to her cultivated land, resulting in damages to the land and rendering a large part of the same unfit for cultivation, to her injury and damage a stated sum, and that she had in writing demanded compensation from said commissioners, who had refused payment thereof.

February 15, 1911.

*680Action for damages. Before Judge Felton. Crawford superior, court. October term 1909.

*Robert W. Barnes,*for plaintiff.

*A. J. Danielly*and *II. A. Mathews,*for defendant.

Beck, J.

The headnote contains the substance of the allegations contained in the plaintiff’s petition. And while the petition may be open to special demurrer because of the vague and indefinite statement of the manner in which the injury and damage to the land in question was caused, ánd possibly on the further ground of the insufficiency of the averment of a presentation of plaintiff’s claim against the county under the requirements of § 362 of the Political Code of 1895 (Civil Code (1910), § 411), the petition as a whole was not subject to general demurrer, under the ruling made in the case of *Barfield*v. *Macon County,*109 *Ga.*386 (34 S. E. 596). That ruling decides the issue raised by the general demurrer adversely to the demurrant in the present case, and requires a reversal of the judgment of the court below.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur..*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 696

 575

 554

 511

 514

 512

 490

 479

 479

 501

 500

 496

 494

 554

 529

 536

 557

 572

 593

 589

 582

 556

 553

 549

 556

 547

 551

 527

 510

 499

 464

 462

 458

 458

 455

 451

 445

 446

 448

 453

 458

 462

 466

 474

 489

 496

 520

 546

 559

 550

 538

 523

 509

 504

 496

 484

 483

 477

 475

 476

 505

 491

 479

 473

 474

 471

 464

 458

 458

 467

 468

 471

 477

 494

 499

 516

 542

 559

 568

 564

 554

 538

 527

 523

 516

 507

 507

 498

 489

 484

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
### §384. Employment of superintendents of irrigation

The Commissioner of Indian Affairs, under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior, may employ superintendents of irrigation who shall be skilled irrigation engineers, not to exceed seven in number.

(Apr. 4, 1910, ch. 140, §1, 36 Stat. 271.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
(No. 821

Claimant awarded $2,950.00.)

#### Ed. S. Smith, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Fees *& salaries*— when *State liable.*An employee of the State is entitled to receive the salary fixed by statute pertaining to his employment, and the State is liable therefor.

Watson & Warford, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant was appointed in due course as metal mine inspector and entered upon the duties of his position the 16th day of February, 1922* and has continued as such inspector from the time of his appointment until the filing of his declaration.

The plaintiff alleges that his salary was fixed by the laws of the State of Illinois, Section .95, Chapter 93 of the Smith - Hurd, Illinois Statute, that the amount so fixed was $3,600.00 a year, that part of the time he was paid $250.00 per month and part of the time $125.00 per month.

It appears from the record further, that the difference between the amount paid him and the amount allowed by the statute up to July 1,1924, amounts to the sum of $2,950.00.

It does not appear from the declaration that the claimant asked for any further relief.

The Attorney General comes and files his demurrer.

It is the opinion of this court after examining all the records that this claimant entered upon his duties under the statute fixing his salary at $3,600.00 per year for the term of his appointment and,therefore in equity and social justice, as well as law, is entitled to recover for the services rendered.

It is therefore recommended by the court that claimant be allowed the sum of $2,950.00.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4770 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4770

To prohibit any employee or contractor of U.S. Immigration and Customs 
    Enforcement or the Department of Health and Human Services from 
transporting any alien across State lines for the purpose of procuring 
                      an abortion for such alien.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2022

Mr. Marshall (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Braun, Mr. Daines, Mrs. 
  Hyde-Smith, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Lee, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. 
 Scott of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
             and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit any employee or contractor of U.S. Immigration and Customs 
    Enforcement or the Department of Health and Human Services from 
transporting any alien across State lines for the purpose of procuring 
                      an abortion for such alien.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Taxpayer Funds for Illegal Alien 
Abortions Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON THE TRANSPORTATION OF ALIENS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an employee or 
contractor of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or the 
Department of Health and Human Services, acting within the scope of the 
individual's employment or contract, may not transport, or arrange for 
the transportation of, any alien who is unlawfully present in the 
United States across any State line for the purpose of procuring an 
abortion for such alien.

SEC. 3. LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR ABORTIONS.

    No funds authorized or appropriated by Federal law for U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement or for the Department of Health and 
Human Services may be used or made available--
            (1) to pay for an abortion, except in instances in which--
                    (A) the life of the mother would be endangered if 
                the fetus were carried to term; or
                    (B) the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest; 
                or
            (2) to require any person to perform, or to facilitate in 
        any way the performance of, any abortion.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 44.57 Can a unit of general local government appeal a rejection of a protest?

Any affected local government may appeal the Department's decision to reject a protest to the Interior Board of Land Appeals under 43 CFR part 4.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5036 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5036

 To require the sale of ammunition stockpiled by the Internal Revenue 
                                Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2022

 Mr. Marshall introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the sale of ammunition stockpiled by the Internal Revenue 
                                Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SALE OF AMMUNITION.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law--
            (1) not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of 
        this Act, the General Services Administration shall sell to the 
        public by competitive offerings any ammunition purchased or 
        stockpiled by or for the use of the Internal Revenue Service; 
        and
            (2) the proceeds of the sale under paragraph (1) shall be 
        deposited in the general fund of the Treasury less any 
        reasonable costs incurred by the General Services 
        Administration in selling the ammunition.
                                 <all>
```
§ 3162.5-2 Control of wells. ( a ) *Drilling wells.* The operator shall take all necessary precautions to keep each well under control at all times, and shall utiliz and maintain materials and equipment necessary to insure the safety of operating conditions and procedures.
( b ) *Vertical drilling.* The operator shall conduct drilling operations in a manner so that the completed well does not deviate significantly from the vertical without the prior written approval of the authorized officer. Significant deviation means a projected deviation of the well bore from the vertical of 10° or more, or a projected bottom hole location which could be less than 200 feet from the spacing unit or lease boundary. Any well which deviates more than 10° from the vertical or could result in a bottom hole location less than 200 feet from the spacing unit or lease boundary without prior written approval must be promptly reported to the authorized officer. In these cases, a directional survey is required.
( c ) *High pressure or loss of circulation.* The operator shall take immediate steps and utilize necessary resources to maintain or restore control of any well in which the pressure equilibrium has become unbalanced.
( d ) *Protection of fresh water and other minerals.* The operator shall isolate freshwater-bearing and other usable water containing 5,000 ppm or less of dissolved solids and other mineral-bearing formations and protect them from contamination. Tests and surveys of the effectiveness of such measures shall be conducted by the operator using procedures and practices approved or prescribed by the authorized officer.
[47 FR 47765, Oct. 27, 1982. Redesignated and amended at 48 FR 36583, Aug. 12, 1983, further amended at 53 FR 17363, May 16, 1988; 80 FR 16222, Mar. 26, 2015; 82 FR 61949, Dec. 29, 2017]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

948 

CA 15-01525 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. 

 

KERRY A. DONOHUE, FORMERLY KNOWN AS 

KERRY A. IVES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

AMY BERNSTEIN, DEFENDANT, 

AND RICHARD BERNSTEIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

------------------------------------------- 

AMY BERNSTEIN, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,

V

 

MALACHI DONOHUE, DAVID J. BECKER, AND CHARLES 

BAKER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS. 

------------------------------------------- 

RICHARD BERNSTEIN, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,

V

 

MALACHI DONOHUE, DAVID J. BECKER AND CHARLES 

BAKER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF & CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (JOSHUA P. RUBIN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (RICHARD P. WEISBECK, JR., OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County

(Michael L. Nenno, A.J.), entered July 23, 2015. The order, insofar

as appealed from, upon reargument, denied in part the motion of

defendant Richard Bernstein seeking summary judgment. 

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the

attorneys for the parties on August 26, 2016, and filed in the

Cattaraugus County Clerk’s Office on September 29, 2016,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### § 3190.0-4 Objective.

The objective of this part is to assure that delegations of authority, cooperative agreements and contracts as provided for under the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act are carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Act and this title.
§ 4.1166 Contents of answer. An answer to an application for review shall incorporate— ( a ) A statement specifically admitting or denying the alleged facts stated by the applicant;
( b ) A statement of any other relevant facts;
( c ) A statement whether an evidentiary hearing is requested or waived; and
( d ) Any other relevant information.