alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Computer Software Available for License

AGENCY: Office of General Counsel, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of computer software available for license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy announces that the following 
computer software is available for license: ``Thermal Safety Software'' 
or TSS.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John T. Lucas, Office of the Assistant 
General Counsel for Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property, U.S. 
Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 
20585; Telephone (202) 586-2802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The above-captioned computer software was 
developed under the International Science and Technology Center (ISTC) 
project <greek-i>1498. The system, called ``Thermal Safety Software'' 
or TSS, is designed to address the complex problems associated with 
performing reactive hazard assessment (RHA) of chemical processes. This 
is achieved by extensive use of mathematical models and computational 
methods implemented in the software set. TSS application can 
significantly improve reliability of results, speed up the design, 
research, and development work and reduce its cost. TSS has the 
following general features: (1) Sequential simulation as the approach 
to reactive hazard assessment; (2) combination of powerful numerical 
methods and researcher's skills; (3) up-to-date numerical methods and 
web-based technologies; (4) integration of the software suite in one 
system; (5) a unified user-friendly interface; (6) advanced graphics; 
and (7) an advanced training system.
    The software currently may be in need of revision, and the 
Department is looking for one or more private-sector parties who will 
revise and maintain the software at their own expense. The private 
sector party or parties will have the right to market the software to 
non-Government parties. The Government will retain an unlimited, 
royalty free, non-exclusive license in the original version of the 
software for Governmental purposes.
    Parties will be given 45 calendar days from the date of this Notice 
to contact the Department. After the period for response has elapsed, 
respondents will be sent a series of questions on their plans for 
revising, maintaining and commercializing the software, and under what 
terms they would make it available to the Government. DOE will then 
decide which party or parties to select.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 29, 2004.
Paul A. Gottlieb,
Assistant General Counsel for Technology, Transfer and Intellectual 
Property.
[FR Doc. 04-22358 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 3G 

LICENSING S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A., 

Plaintiffs 

§

§

§

§

v. 

HMD AMERICA, INC., and HMD GLOBAL 

OY, 

§

§

§

§

§

NO. 1:20-CV-22051-JEM 

Defendants. §

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE FOR 

GENE W. LEE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION, AND REQUEST TO 

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING 

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Gene W. Lee, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic 

Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and 

Discipline of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and 

Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having considered the motion 

and all other relevant factors, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 

The Motion is GRANTED. Gene W. Lee, may appear and participate in this action on 

behalf of Defendants HMD AMERICA, INC. and HMD GLOBAL OY. The Clerk shall provide 

electronic notification of all electronic filings to Gene W. Lee, at GLee@perkinscoie.com. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at , Florida, this 

day of . 

____________________________________ 

 JOSE E. MARTINEZ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 17-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/09/2020 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIR 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Macreport.net, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, V.
William Lucchetti, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/  V. William Lucchetti, Jr.
----------------------------------
     V. William Lucchetti, Jr.
     Chief Executive Officer


March 1, 2004
(No. 4636

#### Earl H. Beling, d/b/a Beling Engineering Consultants, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 21, 1955.*

Andrew Kopp, Attorney for Claimant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General; Marion G. Tiernan, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Wham, J.

The complaint filed herein alleges that there is now due and owing claimant from respondent the sum of $3,190.77. Said amount represents the balance due on certain contracts wherein claimant furnished engineering services in designing and supervising the construction of new boilers, turbine generator, and the electrical distribution system at the Illinois State Penitentiary, Menard Branch, Menard, Illinois. The contracts were entered into on January 16, 1946, and were subsequently revised by the Supervising Architect of the State of Illinois. These services are further described in the complaint as being furnished under the provisions of contracts Nos. 64142 and 6738.

*192It is further alleged that the provisions of the contract were completely performed by claimant on September 17, 1953; that respondent was submitted a statement for the balance due and owing claimant on March 15,1954; and, that the appropriation lapsed prior to the payment of said claim.

Respondent’s Departmental Report, dated January 24, 1955, and signed by E. A. Rosenstone, Director of Public Works and Buildings, acknowledges that the balance due and owing claimant for performing said services under said contracts is $3,190.77.

Respondent has stipulated in writing with claimant that the said Departmental Report shall constitute the record in the case, and that briefs and arguments shall be waived.

From the record submitted in this case, it appears that the amount of $3,190.77 is now due and owing-claimant by respondent, and the claim in that amount is hereby allowed.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6550

MANUEL PEREZ

- COLON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh , Chief District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv - 00066

- GMG

- MJA )

Submitted : July 27, 2017 Decided: August 15, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Manuel Perez

- Colon, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Tison, Assistant United States Attorney s , Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Manuel Perez

- Colon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and d enying relief on Perez

Colon’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petitio n. We have reviewed the record and find no

reve rsible error

. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perez

- Colon v. O’Brien , No. 3:14

- cv 00066

- GMG

- MJA (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 12, 2017). We further deny Perez

- Colon’s motion to consolidate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DAN CHILIEAN

, Appellant,

v.

CHASE RUSSELL and GENESIS CAPITAL GROUP LLC

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 21

- 3222

[ December 29, 2022 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Ellen Feld , Judge; L.T. Case No. COWE20

- 18368

.

Jesse Long and Aylin Ruiz of Legal Grit, PLLC, Boca Raton, for

appellant.

Frank Dello Russo and Yanina Ziberman of South Florida Law, PLLC,

Hallandale Beach, for appellees.

P ER C URI AM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, D AMOORGIAN and K UNTZ , JJ., concur

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. J. Benedict Roache, Respondent, v. Harry A. Hanbury, Appellant.

Stay of execution granted up to and including the 25th day of May, 1914. Present — Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
#### § 108.200 Adequate capital for NMVC Companies.

You must meet the requirements of §§ 108.200-108.230 in order to qualify for designation as a NMVC Company and to receive Leverage.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     MACAW CAPITAL, INC.  June 30, 1997  financial  statements and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894542
<NAME>                        MACAW CAPITAL, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
No. 12,381.

#### Colorado Utilities Corporation *v.*Casady.

(300 Pac. 606)

Decided June 1, 1931.

Messrs. Grant, Ellis, Shafroth & Toll, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. J. F. Meador, Mr. W. C. Reilly, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Butler

delivered the opinion of the court.

*169Milo Edwin Casady, an infant, sued the Colorado Utilities Corporation for damages sustained by him as the result of the negligence of that corporation. His mother, Mildred A. Casady, the defendant in error here, sued for damages sustained by her by reason of the injuries to her son. Both cases were tried at the same time, before the same jury, and upon the same evidence except as to damages. See *Colorado Utilities Corporation v. Casady,*89 Colo. 156, 300 Pac. 601, just decided. As to all questions raised in this case, except the question relating to the measure of damages, the decision in that case is decisive here.

The court instructed the jury that if they found the issues for the plaintiff, they could consider, in estimating her damages, several' items, among them her future pecuniary loss on account of added expense for Milo and on account of the loss of his services.

Counsel contend that there was no evidence to support the instruction as to future expenses. As no such objection was made at the trial, we will not consider it here.

Counsel also contend that the instruction is erroneous because it does not limit the recovery for loss of services to such loss during’ Milo’s minority. The instruction is subject to that criticism, but as no such specific objection was made at the trial, we will not consider it here. Our rule 7 provides that on review only objections specifically made to instructions before they are given to the jury will be considered. If the specific objection now made had been called to the attention of the trial court at the proper time, the court could, and no doubt would, have avoided the difficulty by a few strokes of the pen. It was to give trial courts that very opportunity that rule 7 was adopted. *Koontz v. People,*82 Colo. 589, 263 Pac. 19. The contention that there was. no evidence to support the instruction cannot be sustained.

The judgment is affirmed.

*170Mr. Chiee Justice Adams, Mr. Justice Moore and Mr. Justice Burke concur.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Take the Bus to Hurricane Ridge

Olympic National Park
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 3G 

LICENSING S.A and SISVEL S.p.A

Plaintiffs,

v.

HMD AMERICA, INC., and HMD 

GLOBAL OY

Defendants.

 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-cv-22051-DPG

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW COUNSEL

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Withdraw 

Counsel [D.E. No. ], filed October 12, 2020.

The Court, having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised in the premises, it is

hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

Defendants’ motion is granted. Elizabeth M. Manno is hereby removed as attorney of 

record for Defendants. The clerk shall remove her from the CM/ECF noticing list.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Miami, Florida, this day of October ___, 2020.

__________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-22051-DPG Document 28-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/12/2020 Page 1 of 1
Opinion issued August 27, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-24-00503-CV

———————————

ONELIA MARIEL CARRETO VAZQUES, Appellant

V.

JULIO ALBERTO SERRANO LANDAVERDE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 280th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2024-05694

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Onelia Mariel Carreto Vazques, has filed a notice of appeal from 

the trial court’s February 15, 2024 protective order. Appellant has neither 

established indigence for purposes of costs nor paid or made arrangements to pay 

the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R.
2

APP. P. 20.1(a), 37.3(b). On July 17, 2024, appellant was notified that this appeal 

was subject to dismissal if she did not submit written evidence that she had paid or 

made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record by August 

16, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately 

respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.
#### Edwin Jay, Inc., Respondent, v. William Shields, Doing Business as Williams Advertising Agency, Appellant, et al., Undertenant.

Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present —- Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
|  |  |
|--|--|

|   | November 2002 |
|--------|---------------|

 

A Motor Carrier's Guide to     Improving Highway SafetyEducation and Technical Assistance Program
TABLE OF CONTENTS | FMCSAHome
PDF Files may be viewed with Adobe Acrobat Reader
#### § 4.1361 Who may file.

The applicant, permittee, or any person having an interest which is or may be adversely affected by a decision of OSMRE set forth in § 4.1360 may file a request for review of that decision.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,630,613
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,023,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,123,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,281,143
<PP&E>                                       1,859,927
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,324,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,367,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,632,399
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,907
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,517,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,367,637
<SALES>                                      2,818,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,818,262
<CGS>                                        1,116,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,700,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (174,412)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,824,419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,851,419)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,851,419)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.83)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.472

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 185275 dated February 16, 2021

 

For Rendering

 

Intrazonal communications services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until February 16, 2026.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated November 13, 2020 No. 495-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   O.А. Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 122313
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00793- CV

K. J. B., Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 26TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 10- 506- C26, H ONO RAB LE B ILLY RAY STUB B LEF IELD, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

K.J .B. appea ls f

rom the trial court’s denial of his pe tition for expunction of rec ords perta ining to his Aug ust 9, 2002 arr est for a felony

. Although the State initially opposed the petition and this appea l, the expunction statute was amende d during the pendenc y of this appea l. See Act of May 27, 2011, 82d L eg ., R.S., ch. 690, § 1, 2011 Tex. Gen. L aws ____ (codifie d at Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. a

rt. 55.01 (West Supp. 2011)). The amendments apply to expunction of arre st recor ds and files for any criminal offe nse that occur red befor e, on, or afte r September 1, 2011. Id. § 7. More than three y ear s have passed since the arr est, and the parties ag ree that no indictment or information char g ing appellant with the offe nse was ever prese nted and that K.J .B. was n o t convicted or put under court-or dere d community supervision. The State ag ree s that, under these fac ts and the statute

as amende d and applicable to this case , K.J .B. is entitled to expunction of the rec ords perta ining to this arre st. See Tex. Code Crim. P roc. A nn. art. 55.01(a ) (West Supp. 2011).Wit hout r eg ard to the merits of the trial court’s Orde r of Denial or the appea l unde r

the law exis ting at the t i m e t h e d ec i s i on was made and the appea l was filed, we conclude and the parties ag ree that K.J .B. is now entitled to expuncti o n o f these rec ords. We reve rse the trial court’s Orde r of Denial and rema nd the cause to the trial court for entry of an order expunging

rec ords perta ining to K.J .B.’ s arr est o n Au gu st 9, 2002 consistent with the applicable statute and this opini on.

J eff Rose, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose and Goodwin Reverse d and Remande d Filed: Mar ch 1, 2012

2