alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION  I, Keith Berman, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this

r

eport on Form 10-K of InstaCare Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants

fourth

 fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,

to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions)

:  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date: April 9, 2010  /s/ Keith Berman Keith Berman Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
### §5274. Applicability of other laws

The provisions, including penalties, of sections 9, and 10 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C., secs. 49, 50), as now or hereafter amended, shall apply to the jurisdiction, powers, and duties of the Secretary under this subtitle, and to any person (whether or not a corporation) subject to the provisions of this subtitle.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1372; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5274, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 651, related to sign required on rectifying premises, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859. See section 5180 of this title.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior section 5317(b), act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 660, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
§ 3422.3-2 Conduct of sale. ( a ) ( 1 ) Sealed bids shall be received only until the hour on the date specified in the notice of competitive leasing; all sealed bids submitted after that hour shall be returned. The authorized officer shall read all sealed bids, and shall announce the highest bid.
( 2 ) No decision to accept or reject the high bid will be made at the time of sale.
( b ) A sale panel shall convene to determine: ( 1 ) If the high bid was properly submitted;
( 2 ) if it reflects the FMV of the tract; and
( 3 ) whether the bidder is qualified to hold the lease. The recommendations of the panel shall be in writing and sent to the authorized officer who shall make the final decision to accept a bid or reject all bids. The sale panel's recommendation and the authorized officer's written decision shall be entered in the case file for the offered tract. The successful bidder shall be notified in writing. The Department reserves the right to reject any and all bids regardless of the amount offered, and shall not accept any bid that is less than fair market value. The authorized officer shall notify any bidder whose bid has been rejected and include in such notice a statement of the reason for the rejection. The Department reserves the right to offer the lease to the next highest qualified bidder if the successful bidder fails to execute the lease, or is for any reason disqualified from receiving the lease.
( c ) Each sealed bid shall be accompanied by a certified check, cashier's check, bank draft, money order, certificate of bidding rights, personal check or cash for one-fifth of the amount of the bonus, and a qualifications statement over the bidder's own signature with respect to citizenship and interests held, as prescribed in § 3472.2-2 of this title.
[44 FR 42615, July 19, 1979. Redesignated and amended at 47 FR 33140, July 30, 1982]
### §9602. Management of Trust Funds

#### (a) Report

It shall be the duty of the Secretary of the Treasury to hold each Trust Fund established by subchapter A, and (after consultation with any other trustees of the Trust Fund) to report to the Congress each year on the financial condition and the results of the operations of each such Trust Fund during the preceding fiscal year and on its expected condition and operations during the next 5 fiscal years. Such report shall be printed as a House document of the session of the Congress to which the report is made.

#### (b) Investment

#### (1) In general

It shall be the duty of the Secretary of the Treasury to invest such portion of any Trust Fund established by subchapter A as is not, in his judgment, required to meet current withdrawals. Such investments may be made only in interest-bearing obligations of the United States. For such purpose, such obligations may be acquired—

(A) on original issue at the issue price, or

(B) by purchase of outstanding obligations at the market price.

#### (2) Sale of obligations

Any obligation acquired by a Trust Fund established by subchapter A may be sold by the Secretary of the Treasury at the market price.

#### (3) Interest on certain proceeds

The interest on, and the proceeds from the sale or redemption of, any obligations held in a Trust Fund established by subchapter A shall be credited to and form a part of the Trust Fund.

(Added Pub. L. 97–119, title I, §103(a), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1638.)
#### § 3175.110 Gas sampling and analysis.

Except as stated in this section or as prescribed in Table 1 to this section, the standards and requirements in this section apply to all gas sampling and analyses. (Note: The following table lists the standards in this subpart and the API standards that the operator must follow to take a gas sample, analyze the gas sample, and report the findings of the gas analysis. A requirement applies when a column is marked with an “x” or a number.)

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER17NO16.064/ER17NO16.064_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER17NO16.064/ER17NO16.064_original_size.png)
§ 5003.2 Notice of forest management decisions. ( a ) The BLM authorizes forest management activities, which are defined in § 5003.4, by issuing forest management decisions. Forest management decisions that the BLM may make effective immediately pursuant to § 5003.1(a) shall be posted on a designated agency website while also: ( 1 ) Publishing a notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the area;
( 2 ) Sending a notice by direct or electronic mail to a list of parties requesting direct notification; or
( 3 ) Broadcasting a notice on one or more mass-media platforms.
( b ) The posting date of the forest management decision on the agency website establishes the effective date of the decision for purposes of an appeal under 43 CFR part 4.
#### Carrie Anthony, as Administratrix of the Estate of Tracy A. Anthony, Deceased, Appellant, v. Jennie Schofield, Respondent.

Memorandum: Jennie Cornwell, a juror in the above ease, made affidavit in relation to the attitude of juror Walter E. Hart during the course *906of the trial as follows: “He seemed to think from the very start of the trial that Mrs. Anthony shouldn’t recover anything; sometimes during the noon hour he stayed by at the women’s room and would talk about the case.” Grace Manley," a juror, made affidavit relative to Mr. Hart’s attitude as follows: “ Mr. Hart was very talkative, seemed to have the whole say and run the whole show; that he was very strong for a no cause verdict from the very start and talked that way during the trial and before the case was submitted to the jury.” In his affidavit read in opposition to the motion, juror Hart does not deny these statements. Since said statements were made outside of the jury room and since they had no relation to the deliberation of the jury, they were competent to show that juror Hart was not eligible, on account of prejudice and bias towards the plaintiff, to sit as a juror in this case. In addition to the foregoing, juror Hart did not disclose on his *voir dire*that he had been convicted of a felony. Upon these facts, not in dispute, the interests of justice require that a new trial be granted. (See *McHugh*v. *Jones,*258 App. Div. 111, affd. 283 N. Y. 534; *Harris*v. *Eclipse Light Co.,*114 Misc. 399; *Knice*v. *Hedges,*119 Misc. 1, affd. 205 App. Div. 871; *Steubing*v. *Krischer,*168 Misc. 20; *Matter of Knickerbocker Textile Corp.,*172 Misc. 1015, affd. 259 App. Div. 992; *Knickerbocker*v. *Erie R. R. Co.,*247 App. Div. 495; Notes, 36 Mich. Law Review, pp. 1020-1023.) All concur, except Cunningham and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict of the jury in favor of defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.
#### § 4.1261 When to file.

An application for temporary relief may be filed by any party to a proceeding at any time prior to decision by an administrative law judge.
**Exhibit 12.2**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Klaus Kühn, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Bayer AG; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andhave:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by theannual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: April 6, 2004
   /s/ KLAUS KÜHN Title: Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7176

ANTHONY T. STEWART,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DANIEL T. MAHON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 10-7178

ANTHONY T. STEWART,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DANIEL T. MAHON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District 

Judge. (7:10-cv-00207-sgw-mfu; 7:10-cv-00242-sgw-mfu)

Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: July 25, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony T. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Josephine Frances Whalen, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Anthony T. Stewart seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petitions. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Stewart has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
4

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM STERLING
WORLDWIDE   CORPORATION  (A  DEVELOPMENT  STAGE  CO.)   CONSOLIDATED   FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS, JULY 30, 1997 AND SEPTEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN IT ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10QSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000894539
<NAME>                        Sterling Worldwide Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                   USD
       
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                          DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                 1
<CASH>                                                     27,111
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              60,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           37,111
<PP&E>                                                 80,840,001
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         10,089,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     432,260
<BONDS>                                                 4,554,455
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      51,046
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                   10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              5,194,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           10,089,602
<SALES>                                                    34,258
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           35,733
<CGS>                                                      13,827
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             150,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          (67,691)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (115,259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            (67,691)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (182,950)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### Anna Spool et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Property Owners in the Town of Brookhaven, Suffolk County, Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Woodhull Landing Company, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Action to enjoin defendants from excluding plaintiffs and the public in general from the use of certain lands. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *post,*p. 911.]
#### Claire A. Taishoff, Respondent, v. Samuel J. Taishoff, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §701. Partners, not partnership, subject to tax

A partnership as such shall not be subject to the income tax imposed by this chapter. Persons carrying on business as partners shall be liable for income tax only in their separate or individual capacities.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 239.)
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of The Macreport.net, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB Amendment 2 for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, V. William Lucchetti, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
      (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








_______ /s/ ___________


V.
      William Lucchetti, Jr.


Chief
      Executive Officer


April
        21,
        2006
#### § 4.1350 Scope.

These rules set forth the procedures for obtaining review of a preliminary finding by OSM under section 510(c) of the Act and 30 CFR 774.11(c) of an applicant's or operator's permanent permit ineligibility.

[67 FR 61511, Oct. 1, 2002]
Exhibit 4.373

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 169446 dated October 15, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

Telematic services

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

Mobile Trend (Zelenaya Tochka Group)

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1082635008939

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

2634081081

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

121 r., 217, Gagarina str., Nevinnomyssk, Stavropol region, 357106

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until October 15, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated October 18, 2018 No. 735-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal: 
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS 
   COMMUNICATIONS 
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION 
   IN THE SPHERE 
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION 
   TECHNOLOGY 
   AND MASS MEDIA 
   PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 106591
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Horseback Riding & Stock Use