alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### [§2604. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §221(a)(95)(B)(i), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4051]

Section, added Pub. L. 99–514, title XIV, §1431(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2718; amended Pub. L. 107–16, title V, §532(c)(10), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 75, related to credit for certain State generation-skipping transfer taxes.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 19, 2014, subject to a savings provision, see section 221(b) of Pub. L. 113–295, set out as an Effective Date of 2014 Amendment note under section 1 of this title.
----

| 1.   | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date Dated: November 5, 2010  | /s/  | Gary A. Schuman           |   |
|------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------------|--------|
|                               |      | Name Gary A. Schuman |   |
|                               |      | Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|                               |      |                      |   |

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

November 13, 2003

 

VIA EDGARSecuritiesand Exchange Commission450Fifth Street, N.W.Washington,D.C. 20549

 

**Re:****                         ****SegueSoftware, Inc. Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Segue Software, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Joseph K. Krivickas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifythat:

 

1.the Company’s Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

2.the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, andshall not be deemed a part of the Report.

 
|   | Sincerely,                |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   |                      |
|   | /s/  JOSEPH K. KRIVICKAS  |   |
|   | Joseph  K. Krivickas      |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
# Journal officiel C 278A/11 n

| | ISSN 1725-2431 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 278A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 48e année11 novembre 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2431

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 278A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

48e année11 novembre 2005

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informations |
| | Conseil |
| 2005/C 278A/1 | Publication d'un avis de vacance pour un poste d'assistant — Référence: Conseil/B/025 | 1 |
| | Banque centrale européenne |
| 2005/C 278A/2 | Poste vacant à la direction générale des affaires juridiques — Directeur général adjoint | 2 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

III   Informations

Conseil

2005/C 278A/1

Publication d'un avis de vacance pour un poste d'assistant — Référence: Conseil/B/025

1

Banque centrale européenne

2005/C 278A/2

Poste vacant à la direction générale des affaires juridiques — Directeur général adjoint

2

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

III Informations

Conseil

| 11.11.2005 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2005

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 278/1

---

PUBLICATION D'UN AVIS DE VACANCE POUR UN POSTE D'ASSISTANT

Référence: Conseil/B/025

(2005/C 278 A/01)

Le secrétariat général du Conseil de l'Union européenne cherche à pourvoir, à titre temporaire:

| — | deux emplois de catégorie B*, grade 3 (AST3) — Conseil/B/025 |
| --- | --- |

—

deux emplois de catégorie B*, grade 3 (AST3) — Conseil/B/025

au sein du service de protection des missions du bureau de sécurité.

Pour obtenir de plus amples renseignements, prière de s'adresser au service de recrutement, à l'adresse électronique suivante:

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

ou sur le site internet de ce service, à l'adresse:

http://ue.eu.int/concours

Délai: 2 décembre 2005, le cachet de la poste faisant foi.

---

Banque centrale européenne

| 11.11.2005 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 278/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2005

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 278/2

---

POSTE VACANT À LA DIRECTION GÉNÉRALE DES AFFAIRES JURIDIQUES

Directeur général adjoint

(2005/C 278 A/02)

La Banque centrale européenne (BCE) recherche des candidats qualifiés en vue de pourvoir le poste de directeur général adjoint chargé des affaires juridiques. Des informations détaillées sur le profil requis et les fonctions attachées à ce poste ainsi que sur la procédure à suivre pour faire acte de candidature sont publiées sur le site internet de la BCE à l'adresse suivante: www.ecb.int (rubrique «Job opportunities»).

---
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 11/20/14

FROM: Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with Local Environmental Groups

SUMMARY: 

EPA Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to attendees at a meeting of local 

environmental groups in Palm Beach, Florida, on 7/24/14. The Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Bryan Myers/EPA R4

External Stakeholders

Barbara Eriv, League of Women Voters Palm Beach County

Tara Bardi and Mary Crider, Arthur R. Marshall Foundation

Approximately 250 in attendance
§ 431.1 Purpose. ( a ) The Secretary of the Interior (Secretary), acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation (Commissioner), is authorized and directed to operate, maintain, and replace the facilities at the Hoover Powerplant, and also to promulgate regulations as the Secretary finds necessary and appropriate in accordance with the authorities in the Reclamation Act of 1902, and all acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto.
( b ) In accordance with the Boulder Canyon Project Act of 1928, as amended and supplemented (Project Act), the Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act of 1940, as amended and supplemented (Adjustment Act), and the Hoover Power Plant Act of 1984 (Hoover Power Plant Act), the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) promulgates these “General Regulations for Power Generation, Operation, Maintenance, and Replacement at the Boulder Canyon Project, Arizona/Nevada” (General Regulations) which include procedures to be used in providing Contractors and the Western Area Power Administration (Western) with cost data and power generation estimates, a statement of the requirements for administration and management of the Colorado River Dam Fund (Fund), and methods for resolving disputes.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 NOVEMBER 22, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 11-12596

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 5:10-cv-00072-HLA-MCR

BAILEY INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(November 22, 2011)

Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
After review and oral argument, we conclude that Defendant-Appellant

Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company has not shown any reversible error in the

district court’s order, dated May 6, 2011, granting summary judgment in part in

favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Bailey Industries, Inc., as to the claim for $188,780.73. 

There was no cross-appeal of the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

part to Defendant-Appellant Amerisure as to the additional $540.00 sought by

Plaintiff-Appellee Bailey Industries.

AFFIRMED.

2
#### In the Matter of Julius Phillips, Appellant, against Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
§ 4.1041 What are the parties' rights during the hearing? Consistent with the provisions of this subpart, and as necessary to ensure full and accurate disclosure of the facts, each party may exercise the following rights during the hearing: ( a ) Present direct and rebuttal evidence;
( b ) Make objections, motions, and arguments; and
( c ) Cross-examine witnesses, including OFA staff, and conduct re-direct and re-cross examination as permitted by the ALJ.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Walk to Bent's Fort

Bent's Old Fort National Historic Site, Santa Fe National Historic Trail
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andy Blutier, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §5503. Construction and equipment

Plants established under this part for the manufacture of vinegar by the vaporizing process shall be constructed and equipped in accordance with such regulations as the Secretary shall prescribe.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1391; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior sections 5216(a)(1) and 5552, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 640, 680, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
§ 3440.0-3 Authority. ( a ) These regulations are issued under the authority of the statutes cited in § 3400.0-3 of this title.
( b ) These regulations primarily implement section 8 of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended (30 U.S.C. 208).
UNIT.ED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

MEMORANDUM 

Date: 8 September 20 14 

OFFICE OF 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 

PbLLUTION PREVENTION 

SUBJECT: Fluensulfone- Clarification of Revised Tolerance Recommendation. 

PC Code: 050410 

Decision No.: 464527 

Petition No.: 2F8019 

Risk Assessment Type: Single Chemical Aggregate 

TXRNo.: NA 

MRID No.: NA 

DP Barcode: 0422696 

Registration No.: 11 678-TG, 66222-EUG 

Regulatory Action: Section 3 

Case No.: None 

CAS No.: 318290-98-I 

40 CFR: New Active lngredient 

FROM: Michael A. Doherty, Ph.D., Senior Chemist ft.,.,~J c:::{:;)~ Risk Assessment Branch II (RAB II) . 

Health Effects Division (HED; 7509P) 

THROUGH: Christina Swartz, Chief .r-. (\ · A--- RAB II ~~ HED (7509P) 

TO: Jennifer Gaines/Reuben Baris (Team 7) 

Insecticide/Rodenticide Branch 

Registration Division (7505P) 

In a memorandum dated 4 September 2014 (0422659), HED provided RD with revised tolerance 

recommendations for residues offluensulfone in/on cucurbit vegetables (Crop Group 9) and 

fruiting vegetables {Crop Group 8). The revision was in response to a proposed reduction in .the 

application rate of the end use product. This memorandum is to clarify that the revised tolerance 

levels should be expressed in the Code of Federal Regulations to two decimal places (i.e., 0.50 

ppm) in order to ensure proper compliance. 

Page 1 of 1
#### Arthur J. Jones, as Administrator of the Estate of James A. Jones, Deceased, Appellant, v. Edward R. Rigney, Jr., Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.. [See *post,*p. 941.]
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Walk Your Pet along Palo Verde Trail

Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument
#### § 5.10 Can I appeal a decision not to issue a permit?

Yes. If your request for a permit is denied, the site manager issuing the denial will inform you of how and where to appeal.
#### § 5511.3-7 Permits to nonprofit organizations.

A free-use permit issued to a nonprofit association or corporation may not provide for the disposition of more than $100 worth of timber to the permittee during any one calendar year. Such permittee is granted a right to remove timber as against a subsequent applicant who may wish to obtain the same timber by purchase. The timber may not be removed by the permittee after the land has been included in a valid claim by reason of settlement, entry, or similar rights obtained under the public land laws.
### PART II—TAX RETURNS OR STATEMENTS

Subpart
A.
General requirement.
B.
Income tax returns.
C.
Estate and gift tax returns.
D.
Miscellaneous provisions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–312, title III, §301(a), Dec. 17, 2010, 124 Stat. 3300, amended analysis to read as if amendment by Pub. L. 107–16, §542(b)(5)(B), had never been enacted. See 2001 Amendment note below.

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–16, title V, §542(b)(5)(B), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 84, substituted "Returns relating to transfers during life or at death" for "Estate and gift tax returns" in item for subpart C.
#### § 3601.40 Mining and reclamation plans.

BLM may require you to submit mining and reclamation plans before we begin any environmental review or issue a contract or permit. You may combine these plans in one document.
### **Subchapter T—Cooperatives and Their Patrons**

Part
I.
Tax treatment of cooperatives.
II.
Tax treatment by patrons of patronage dividends and per-unit retain allocations.
III.
Definitions; special rules.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–809, title II, §211(b)(5), Nov. 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 1582, inserted "and per-unit retain allocations" in heading of part II.

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–834, §17(a), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 1045, added headings of subchapter T and of parts I to III.
#### § 30.409 How will a pending purchase at probate request affect how the decedent's property is distributed?

When the decision (or distribution order following a reconsideration order under § 30.251) becomes final, BIA may distribute the estate as stated in the decision or distribution order. The decision or distribution order will identify any property interest that is the subject of a pending request for purchase at probate, and that the property interest will be conveyed with an encumbrance, which will remain on the property interest until the request is fully addressed. The encumbrance does not affect distribution of trust personalty.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Theodore R. Maloney, Chief Executive Officer of MediCor Ltd. (the“Registrant”), certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. Dated: September 20, 2004 /s/ Theodore R. Maloney
#### § 46.445 Preparing a legislative environmental impact statement.

When required under 40 CFR 1506.8, the Department must ensure that a legislative environmental impact statement is included as a part of the formal transmittal of a legislative proposal to the Congress.
#### Josephine Midolla, Respondent, v. Pepper Brothers Contractors, Inc., Defendant, and C. D. Hurray Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

All concur.
Document

Exhibit 10.35

CERTAIN IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE REGISTRANT IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. [***] INDICATES THAT INFORMATION HAS BEEN REDACTED.
AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 
TO SEMICONDUCTOR PATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT


This Amendment Number 2 (“Amendment 2”) amends that certain Semiconductor Patent License Agreement between Rambus Inc., and Micron Technology, Inc. effective December 1, 2013, as amended on September 2, 2020 (collectively, the “Patent License Agreement”), and is effective as of December 1, 2020 (the “Amendment 2 Effective Date”).  Rambus, on behalf of itself and all of its subsidiaries (collectively, “Rambus”) and Micron Technology, Inc., on behalf of itself and all of its subsidiaries (collectively, “Micron”) (Rambus and Micron together, the “Parties”), and in consideration of the covenants set forth below, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby agree as follows:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1.    Capitalized terms in this Amendment 2 shall have the meaning assigned to them in the Patent License Agreement.  
2.    Section 5.1(b)(B) of the Patent License Agreement is hereby amended to delete the following language in such Section 5.1(b)(B):


[***]


3.    Except as set forth in this Amendment No. 2, all other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.  
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Parties have executed this Agreement effective as of December 1, 2020.
									
	Micron Technology, Inc.		Rambus Inc.
			
	/s/ JOEL POPPEN		/s/ JAE KIM
	Signature		Signature
			
	Joel Poppen		Jae Kim
	Printed Name		Printed Name
			
	SVP, Legal Affairs, GC & Corp Secretary		SVP - GC/HR
	Title		Title
			
	12/15/2020		12/15/2020
	Date		Date
#### Betty Anne Handbag Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Harmony Bag Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

In an action to enjoin defendants from engaging in a certain business in the city of Newburgh for a specified period, plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See *post,*p. 910.]
#### § 3832.30 Mill sites.
§ 4.478 Appeals to the Board of Land Appeals; judicial review. ( a ) Any person who has a right of appeal under § 4.410 or other applicable regulation may appeal to the Board from an order of an administrative law judge granting or denying a petition for a stay in accordance with § 4.411.
( b ) As an alternative to paragraph (a) of this section, any party other than BLM may seek judicial review under 5 U.S.C. 704 of a final BLM grazing decision if the administrative law judge denies a petition for a stay, either directly or by failing to meet the deadline in § 4.472(d).
( c ) If a party appeals under paragraph (a) of this section, the Board must issue an expedited briefing schedule and decide the appeal promptly.
( d ) Unless the Board or a court orders otherwise, an appeal under paragraph (a) of this section does not— ( 1 ) Suspend the effectiveness of the decision of the administrative law judge; or
( 2 ) Suspend further proceedings before the administrative law judge.
( e ) Any party adversely affected by the administrative law judge's decision on the merits has the right to appeal to the Board under the procedures in this part.
[68 FR 68771, Dec. 10, 2003, as amended at 75 FR 64669, Oct. 20, 2010]