alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Thomas Stone
National Historic Site
Maryland


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Stone Family Cemetery
 One of the most prominent features of the landscape at Thomas Stone National Historic Site is the Stone Family Cemetery. Explore the cemetery through historic and modern photos.
 Last updated: August 27, 2021
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 6655 Rose Hill Road
Port Tobacco,
MD
20677
 Phone: 804-224-1732
x227 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
EXHIBIT 11

                            VIANET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                          CALCULATION OF LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                               Three months ended   Three months ended
                                                      March 31         March 31
     
                                                        1999             1998
Primary and Fully Diluted Loss Per Share

<S>                                                     <C>          <C>    
Shares in issue beginning of period ...............     350,000      350,000
Shares issued (weighted average) ..................      90,890         --
Weighted average shares in issue end of period        ---------     --------
                                                        440,890      350,000

Dilutive Common Stock Equivalents
(weighted average)(1) .............................        --           --
Other stock options using treasury stock method (1)        --           --
                                                      ---------     --------

Total weighted average common shares and
common stock equivalents(1) .......................     440,890      350,000
                                                      ---------     --------
Loss for period (U.S. Dollars) ....................   $(217,350)          $-
                                                      ---------     --------
Loss per  share (1) ...............................   $   (0.49)   $    0.00
                                                      ---------     --------
</TABLE>



     (1) Note:  Potentially  dilutive common stock equivalents and other options
totalling 1,300,000 at March 31, 1999 have been excluded from the computation of
diluted net loss per common share because they are  anti-diutive  for the period
presented.
#### Agnes Thompson, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Levering & Garrigues Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. So opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Document

[NAME]






MARCH 15, 2021
PERFORMANCE UNITS 
AWARD LETTER


Protective Life Corporation has awarded you:
_______ Performance Units
Award Period: January 1, 2021 – December 31, 2023
Date of Grant: March 15, 2021


These Performance Units were awarded pursuant to the Protective Life Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and are subject to the terms and conditions contained in the 2021 Performance Units Award Provisions (“Provisions”), as set forth in Appendix A to this Award Letter, and the Plan. The Plan and the Provisions contain terms and conditions regarding the payment of these Performance Units, termination of employment, tax withholding, non-solicitation of Company employees and customers, regulatory compliance, and other matters, and I encourage you to read the Provisions carefully.


Please retain these documents in your personal records.




/s/ RICHARD J. BIELEN


Richard J. Bielen
President and Chief Executive Officer of
Protective Life Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from Grandeur Inc. March 31, 1998 financial  statements and is
                  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
                  statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                      0000894498
<NAME>                                     Grandeur Inc.

       

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                       0
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                185,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             199,322
<PP&E>                                                       190,038
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (57,121)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               1,332,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        2,404,763
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                     13,848
<OTHER-SE>                                                   (1,086,372)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 1,332,239
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             0
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             136,697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           2,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (138,795)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (138,795)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (138,795)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (.03)
        


</TABLE>
M&I 2010 Sch A-10 F.Z12.XLS

12/17/2009

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF ESTIMATED M&I PROJECT USE ENERGY COSTS

STORAGE, CONVEYANCE, AND OUT-OF-BASIN PUMPING

2010 M&I WATER RATES

Projected

2010 Storage Pumping SFU Conveyance Pumping 

Deliveries Columbia Folsom Gianelli WR Gianelli WR Dos Amigos O'Neill Jones 

Facility/Contractor (Sch. A-12) Mowry Pump Plant Pump-Gen Plt Pump-Gen Plt Pump Plant Pump-Gen Plt Pump Pla

Cross Valley Canal 4/

 County of Fresno County of Tulare Total CVCDelta-Mendota Canal Byron-Bethany ID 865 86

 City of Tracy 8,865 8,86 Del Puerto WD 20 2 Department of Veterans Affairs 100 10 Panoche WD - DMC 25 2 San Luis WD - DMC 180 18 Total DMC 10,055 10,05Delta-Mendota Exchange 71,322 71,32

Folsom Dam & Reservoir

 City of Roseville 31,817 31,817 Sacramento County WD 5,547 5,547 San Juan WD 6,770 6,770 Total Folsom D&R 44,134 44,134San Luis Canal - Fresno 1/ City of Avenal 2,677 1,874 2,677 2,677 2,67 City of Coalinga 7,193 5,035 7,193 7,193 7,19

 City of Huron 1,197 838 1,197 1,197 1,19 State of CA 5 3 5 5  Westlands WD 3,020 2,114 3,020 3,020 3,02 Total SLC - Fresno 14,091 9,864 14,091 14,091 14,09San Luis Canal - Tracy 1/

 Pacheco WD -SLC 12 9 12 12 1 Panoche WD - SLC 58 41 58 58 5 San Luis WD - SLC 620 434 27 2/ 620 62

 Total SLC - Tracy 690 483 97 690 69
M&I 2010 Sch A-10 F.Z12.XLS 

12/17/2009 

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF ESTIMATED M&I PROJECT USE ENERGY COSTS

STORAGE, CONVEYANCE, AND OUT-OF-BASIN PUMPING

2010 M&I WATER RATES

Projected

2010 Storage Pumping SFU Conveyance Pumping 

Deliveries Columbia Folsom Gianelli WR Gianelli WR Dos Amigos O'Neill Jones 

Facility/Contractor (Sch. A-12) Mowry Pump Plant Pump-Gen Plt Pump-Gen Plt Pump Plant Pump-Gen Plt Pump PlaSan Felipe Unit

 San Benito County WD 4,964 4,964 4,964 4,96 Santa Clara Valley WD 99,498 99,498 99,498 99,49 Total SFU 104,462 104,462 104,462 104,46 Total Deliveries 244,755 44,134 10,347 104,462 14,189 119,244 200,62 Estimated 2010 Project Use Energy Costs 1,514 $ 141,305 $ 56,183 $ 567,202 $ 26,859 $ 128,649 $ 864,63

$ 

 Less - Regeneration Credit 

 Gianelli WR Pump-Gen Plt (47,365) $ 

 O'Neill Pump-Gen Plt $ (20,152)

 Net Project Use Energy Costs 8,818 $ 108,497 $ 
M&I 2010 Sch A-10 F.Z12.XLS

12/17/2009

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF ESTIMATED M&I PROJECT USE ENERGY COSTS

STORAGE, CONVEYANCE, AND OUT-OF-BASIN PUMPING

2010 M&I WATER RATES

FOOTNOTES

1/ According to MP-2810 (CB 06/93) only 70% of San Luis Canal Deliveries are stored in B.F.Sisk San Luis Reservoir

and, therefore, require pumping by the WR Gianelli Pump-Generator.

2/ Excludes estimated San Luis WD deliveries before Dos Amigos. Refer to M&I Sch. A-11.xls.3/ Only 50% of Santa Clara Valley WD's deliveries require pumping through Coyote PP.4/ Cross Valley Canal costs for the Dos Amigos PP PUE O&M will be included under direct pumping (see Schedule A-11)
#### Abram B. Swart, Jr., an Infant, by Margaret Swart, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Little Falls Fibre Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
----

Election of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal

(2005/C 271/51)

At a meeting on 6 October 2005, in accordance with Article 3 of the Council Decision of 22 July 2005 appointing Judges of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (1) and Article 4(1) of Annex I to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice, (2) the Judges of the Civil Service Tribunal elected Mr Mahoney President of the Tribunal for the period from 6 October 2005 to 5 October 2008.

----

(1)OJ L 197, 28.7.2005, p. 28.

(2)OJ L 333, 9.11.2004, p. 9.

----
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Charles J. Novak, Chief Financial Officer of Integrated Surgical
Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 12, 2003                 /s/ Charles J. Novak
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                             Charles J. Novak
                                             Chief Financial Officer
§ 4.703 Documents; filing and service. ( a ) If the parties wish to file briefs, they must comply with the following requirements: Appellant shall have 30 days from the date of filing of his notice of appeal within which to file an opening brief, and the opposing parties shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of appellant's brief in which to file an answering brief. Additional or rebuttal briefs may be filed upon permission first obtained from the Director or the Ad Hoc Appeals Board appointed by him to consider and decide the particular appeal. Copies of all briefs shall be served upon all other parties or their attorneys of record or other qualified representatives, and a certificate to that effect shall be filed with said brief.
( b ) A document may be electronically transmitted under the terms specified in the OHA Standing Orders on Electronic Transmission issued by the Director. When done in accordance with the Standing Orders, a document may be: ( 1 ) Filed by electronic transmission; and
( 2 ) Served on or transmitted to a person or party by electronic transmission if that person or party has consented to such means.
[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971; 36 FR 7588, Apr. 22, 1971, as amended at 88 FR 5794, Jan. 30, 2023]
Composite Exhibit "B"

Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 1 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 2 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 3 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 4 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 5 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 6 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 7 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 8 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 9 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 10 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 11 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 12 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 13 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 14 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 15 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 16 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 17 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 18 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 19 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 20 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 21 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 22 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 23 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 24 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 25 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 26 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 27 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 28 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 29 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 30 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 31 of 32
Case 9:20-cv-80804-AHS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 32 of 32
### §6905. Discharge of executor from personal liability for decedent's income and gift taxes

#### (a) Discharge of liability

In the case of liability of a decedent for taxes imposed by subtitle A or by chapter 12, if the executor makes written application (filed after the return with respect to such taxes is made and filed in such manner and such form as may be prescribed by regulations of the Secretary) for release from personal liability for such taxes, the Secretary may notify the executor of the amount of such taxes. The executor, upon payment of the amount of which he is notified, or 9 months after receipt of the application if no notification is made by the Secretary before such date, shall be discharged from personal liability for any deficiency in such tax thereafter found to be due, and shall be entitled to a receipt or writing showing such discharge.

#### (b) Definition of executor

For purposes of this section, the term "executor" means the executor or administrator of the decedent appointed, qualified, and acting within the United States.

#### (c) Cross reference

**For discharge of executor from personal liability for taxes imposed under chapter 11, see section 2204.**

(Added Pub. L. 91–614, title I, §101(e)(1), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1837; amended Pub. L. 91–614, title I, §101(f), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1838; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

1970—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–614, §101(f), substituted "9 months" for "1 year".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Pub. L. 91–614, title I, §101(f), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1838, provided that the amendment made by that section is effective with respect to the estates of decedents dying after Dec. 31, 1973.

#### Effective Date

Section effective with respect to decedents dying after Dec. 31, 1970, see section 101(j) of Pub. L. 91–614, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 2032 of this title.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2016

- 4123 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2016

- NE

- 06

- AD
If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

co st (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### One time inspection, Both hubs affected 16 $ 1,360.0 0 $0 $ 1,360.00 

### 27 9 $ 378,080.00



### One time inspection, Only one hub affected 8.0 $ 680.00 $0 $ 680.00 

### 389 $ 264,520.00



### Stage 1 Hub (pn 2A5001) replacement (pro

rated) $ 0.00 $50,271 $ 50,271.00 

### 284 $ 14,276,964. 00


### Stage 2 Hub (pn 2A4802) replacement (pro

rat ed ) $ 0.00 $40,063 $ 40,063.00 

### 284 $ 11,377,892. 00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 26,297,456 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** Action

(e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### Special considerations for **Economic Analysis** ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

**Executive Order 12866:**

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for
eithe r a Yes or No answer.
YES NO
E xplanation:
**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?
YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
EXHIBIT 32.1 – CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andaccompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30,2007 of Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (the “Issuer”).The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and thatthe information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Issuer.       Date: November 9, 2007         By: /s/ MARK P. MAYS       Name: Mark P. Mays  Title: Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuerand will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22429-CIV-WILLIAMS

RHONDA HOLCOMB,

Plaintiff,

v.

CARNIVAL CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’ Report 

and Recommendation (DE 18) on Defendant Carnival Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss 

(DE 8). Defendant filed Objections (DE 19) to the Report. 

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the matters raised in Defendant’s 

Objections. Defendant’ Objections are OVERRULED.1 Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report (DE 18) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Defendant Carnival Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss (DE 8) is DENIED.

3. Defendant Carnival Corporation shall file an answer to the Complaint within 

fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. 

1 The Court notes that one of Defendant’s Objections is based on the Court’s ruling in Doria v. Royal Caribbean 

Cruises, Ltd., Case No. 19-cv-20179, (DE 13) (S.D. Fla. June 20, 2019). The Court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s joint 

venture claim in that case was based, in part, on plaintiff’s failure to allege any facts to support her allegation that 

the cruise line and the excursion company intended to enter into a joint venture. Because of the plaintiff’s bare, 

conclusory allegation that the parties had intended to enter a joint venture, dismissal was appropriate. Here, 

Plaintiff’s allegations of a joint venture between Defendants sufficiently state a plausible claim to survive dismissal

at this juncture.

Case 1:20-cv-22429-KMW Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 20th day of January, 2021.

Case 1:20-cv-22429-KMW Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2021 Page 2 of 2