IN TH E UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT

SO UTIIERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE N0.:1:20-CV-22318-KM W

M s.KANAYO DERHEM and

M r.M OJTABA E.KOOSEJ,

Plaintiffs,

.

*

FILED BY D.C.

t)2T 1j2022

ANGELAE.NGBLE

cLERKU.s.DlS'rLC'rL

s.D.OFFLA,-MjAM!

BAY HOUSE M lAM lCONDOM INIUM

ASSOCIATION,CHARLESBRUM STEAD,

JR.,JAM ESPINKERT,JOSHUA PAUL,

ALEJANDRO ENRIQUEUTREM BADENES,

JONATHAN FERREIM ,K W PROPERTY

M ANAGEM EN T,LLC andJOSE VIDAL,

Defendants.

PLAINTW FS'REW SED RESPONSESTO DEFENDAXTSSTATEM ENTOF

UNDISPUTED FACTS AND ADDITIONAL FA CTS

Undisputed.

Undisputed.

Undisputed.

Disputed.

1.

2.

3.

4. Ms.Derhem andMr.Koosejalwaysintendedtoptlrchmsezmit2605.Both

Plaintiffs completed Applicationsfor Occupancy w1111the Association.See Doc.214-11 at

BHMCA 000121-000127,which includesMr.Koosej'sannualincomerecords.SeeKoosej's

W-#2#aWf,ExhibitA,at!J.

5. Dksputed.'l'hejointapplicationofMr.KoosejandMs.Derhem,Doc.214-11,includes

incomerecordsreflectingincomein2019of$251,344,BHM CA 00012% D.'Fheimplicationthat

fmancingwaseversolelydependentonM s.Derhem 'sincom eisincorrectSccEx.D atpar.28,'215.

6. Disputed. M aintenance feeshaveincreased;maintenancefees are currently wellover

$1,000permonth.SeepaymentMstory,ExhibitB atpage2.

7. Disputed.AtalrelevanttimesMr.Koosej,togetherwithM s.Derhem,wereapplicants

forpmchaseofUnit2605.SeeDefendants'Exhibit11atBHMCA000121-000127,Doc.214-11.

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 1 of 15
Incomerecordsreiectansnnualincomeof$251,344.TheapplicationforAssociationapproval

wmsnevercontingentonM s.Derhem 'sincom ealone.M oreover,M s.SkangadvisedBHM CA and

Brumstedthattheloanw1t11twobuyers(KoosejandDerhem)hadbeenapprovedpursuanttothe

purchaseofthei.rllnitandthatBHM CA andBrum sted'sapprovalwastheonlythingmissingSee

ExhibitC(entiredocumenoalsoSeeEx.D atpar.28and215

8. Dksputed. ltisnotdisputedthatM n Bnzm sted interviewed Plaintiffsimm ediately upon

receiving an email9om Ms.Skang,threatening litigation and suggesting thatthe delay in

processing Plaintiffs' application was based on discrim ination See Exhibit C, atpage 2.

Imm ediately following receiptofthatem ail9om Strang,an interview wasscheduled between

PlaintiffsandBrtlmstedSeeKoosejW.Flm#/,ExhibitA at!6.Noproofofhospitalizationhas

everbeenofferedtosubstnntiateM n Bnlm sted'sclaim sofpurportedhospitalizationExhibitD,p.

7,!(#J.ThefactthattheinterviewwasonlyscheduledimmediatelyuponreceiptofMs.ïtrang's

em ailclaim ingdiscrim ination suggeststhatBrumsted'sdefem iveexplanationispretextllnl.

9. Disputed.Oflicialapprovaltook25 daysSeeExhibitR.Asdiscussedin eight,above,as

referencedinM s.Strang'sem ail,ExhibitC atpage2,Plaintiffs'repeatedinquiriesregardingthe

pending application were ignored by BHMCA and Brumsted.Clearly,the delayts) in

com mllnicatingwiththePlaintiffsisattributabletoM s.Derhem 'sraceandtransgenderidenétyas

Bnzm sted only agreed to m eetwith Plnintiffsfollowing Strang'saccusationsofdiscrim ination.

M oreover,defendantsadm itthatSeeEx214-14page3atparagraph JJ:''TheAssociation does

not/ceprecordofthedatesonwhichunitownerscloseontheirrespectiveunitsh'withoutsuch

records,thedefensesim plycnnnotsubstantiatetheirclaim that:çltheapprovalwmswithinthesam e

tim e fram e for allotherpurch% ersdllring the one-yer period priorto Plaintiffs'ptlrchase.''

M oreover,Ex 214-14 containsfalsehoods- the defense assertsBHM CA terminated KW PM ;

how ever,KW PM withdrew from BHM CA upon such alleged accusationsofsexualm isconduct

againstBrum sted SeeEx 214-14page3 atparagraph 16 ;SeeExhibitS;SeeExhibitD atPar.

40@(f andatpar102,105,106,148,196,203,246;ExhibitTpages53-56..Moreover,Mr.

Bnlm sted,him qelf,contemporaneously,detailedthattheapprovaltim ewouldonly take20days;

25days,therefore,ism oreth% the20daysBnzm sted,him self,quotedSeeExhibitU.

10. DilputedThereismorecontent,nuanceandcontextw1t11regardleasing;forexample,See

GzfcxfPolicy and leasingdetailspresentedtherein (Def atpar.12.).Althoughthesearethe

contentsofthisspecisc section w ithin the declaration,the occupation ofroomm ateswithin an

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 2 of 15
owner-occupiedlmitiscleadycontemplatedandnotprohibitedbythedeclaration.AsM r.Michael

Relm ESQ,theauthorofthissamedeclarationstates:çIthinkthecondocnnnottellyouwhoyou

canhaveasaroom mateexceptforapersonthatisineligibletoliveinthebuildingforsomeother

reason(likeafelonyconvictionifthatisanexpressrestriction),orifhe/shehasapetinano-pet

building).lfyouareamemberofaprotectedclass,thecondo'srefusalmaybeapretextfor

discriminatiom'' Furthermore, the rentalts) of resident/owner-occupied units is clearly

contemplated,outlined,andpermittedbytheDeclarationSeeExhibitVpage164,2and162.

Dhputed.plaintiffsconcedetheyarejustlikeanyothertmitysubjecttoBHMCA rulesand

regulations.However,Plaintiffsmaintainthedisparateapplication andenforcem entofthenlles

duetoraceandsex-basedanimusisImlawful.Plnintiffsdispute511'simplicationthatBHMCA'S

rulesandregulationsweresom ehow appliedequallyandevenlywithouttmdueraceandsex-based

discriminationSeeExhibitD atpar6744)4g),par.322,par7,par.39,par.61,par66,par82,par

l74,par.263,par.321.

12. Disputed.Theguestpolicyinthiscontext,isnotçofrelevance''SeePlaintp responses

to #10 and #11 above.Plaintiffswere alm ostexclusively in the presence oftheir guests- in

perpettlity.Guests(stayingfor21daysorless)donotrequireregiskationllnlesstheomlerisnot

in residence;and,ifover21daysin thepresence oftheowner,areautom atically considered a

Rlessee''SeeB hibit214-15,Page8,Section 44.Severalfm eslevied againstPlnintiffswerefor

tlGuests''.Forexample,Derhem wasfmed,slandered,andharassedwhenBHM CA/KW PM called

thepoliceonDerhem forhavinghernailtechnicianatherhom eSeeExhibitF'.M s.Derhem 'snail

technicianwascarryingasm allcasewithherm aterialstoperform herservices.BHM CA presllmed

falsely,thatDerhem 's nailtech was an Nllegalrenter''asBrum sted often said.On the false

presumptionalone,BHM CA andK W PM fmedPlaintiffsforGtillegalrenters''andcalledthepolice

toPlaintiffs'hom etohavethenailtechrem oved.AsnotedbyDerhem 'scontem poraneousemail,

BHM CA andKW PM 'Seffortstodiscrim inatewererelentlessandtçdnngerous''SeeEX .D atpage

46atpar.305,and306.

13. Disputed. NeitherBHM CA norKW PM thmiformly enforcesviolationsagainsta11unit

ownersand residents alike.''Otherresidentsnotsharing M s.Derhem 'sracialand kansgender

identity,were permitted - even % sisted - by M r.Brumsted and the Association in procuring

renters/roommatesSeeW' tftzvf ofMr.A'JvfrRambharat,ExhibitE;W.#z#trWfofSebastian

& m/,ç/ltzw,Exhibit& Ay davitofKanayoDerhem,Exhibit.D,page5,!!35-39.Moreover,

3

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 3 of 15
BHM CA hasnotplacedgaudlzlentliensagainstany otherunitthatwasnotowned by som eone

who isboth Black and TransgenderSeeExhibitD atPar.208,atPar.210,atPar.223-224.

Derhem wasdenied conciergeservicesSeeExhibit0.N ootherllnitnotownedby som eonewho

isblack and/ortransgenderhmsbeen denied such conciergeservices.Therecordisdevoidofany

evidencethatoccupancyoflmitsbyotherowners/residentsw1t1roommateswereeversubjected

tosuchm aliciousharassment,fm es,& deniedaccesstoam enities,asrepeatedly occurreddlzring

Derhem'sUnitoccupadonSeeexhibitD par.245-par.274.

Disputed. PlaintiffssoughtBHM CA approvalfortheirroommatesand were deled,

ignored,ortoldblatantlythatsuchroommaterentalswereprohibitedSeeExhYatP(s).2and3.

Plaintiffsdorenttheirowner-occupiedunittorenters.NostepshaveeverbeentnkentoEtpartition''

thelmitinviolationoftherulesoftheAssociation.Rentersaremssigneduseofspecifk bedroom s

butarenotexcludedby Plnintiffsfrom useofcom mon areaswithin andoutsideofthelmit.Unit

ownershaveaccess,interaliw tobathroom facilities;kitchenandbalconyareaswithinthellnitand

othercomm onlyusedportionsoftheunit.Rentershaveexclusiveuseoftheizassignedbedroom

duringtheiroccupancy.Derhem Ay davit,ExhibitD,Pg2,Iine10-14.SeealsoDoc.214-23

BHM CA000001-000008,Lease betweenD erhem and Brittany Rogers,atSectionIL ,providing

thatthelemselemsestothetenantapartm ent 600NE 27thSt.2605 çwitllthefollowingflzrniture

andappliances:queenbed,tv,internetrouter,commonroom filrniture,bathroom supplies,kitchen

supplies-theprem ises.''

Room matenm ant,M s.PaulaPandoconfirms:

tç3.Dllringmyoccupancy,yotlrAffantoccupiedadesignatedbedroom andhad

fu11accesstotheotheraremsofthecondoincludingthekitchen,thelivingroom ,

thebalcony andmybathroom .YourAffiantsuppliedherown linenandcaredfor

herownbedroom .

4.Tk oughoutyourAffiant'soccupancy ofUnit2605,yotlrAfliantwasnot

permittedtousebuildingamenitiessuchasthebtlildingswim m ingpoolandyotlr

Affiant'sm onthlyrentreflectedexclusion 9om btlildingam enities.

5.Atthecomm encementofmyoccupancyofUxtit2605,yourAm antw ithM s.

Derhem 'smssistance,weretmsuccessfulinourattemptedtosubmitanapplication

foroccupancytoBHM CA .''SeeF..X?G

15.Dksputed. Plaintiffsleased the apartmentprem ises- notlim ited to a single room - asis

reflectedintheresponseto#14supra.KoosejwasthesoleownerofLtlxairbnbLLCand,ms

theownerofthatentity,hefacilitatedtheroom matetransactionsandthepaym entstherein.No

rulesprohibittheuseofan entitytofacilitatecom mercialtransactionsSeeExhibitE atpar.7

4

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 4 of 15
alsoseeExD atPar24,25and26.Koosej'sentitieshadmanylimitedandnon-member

representativesalsoautholizedtosignonbehalfofhisentity,LtlxairbnbLLC.

16.Disputed. Plaintiffswere leasing thei.rzmitforco-occupancy by renters/room mates.See

Responsesto#14and#15,supra;seeRogersLeaseagreemenlDoc.214-23BHM CAOOOOOI000008,atSection11@rstpagel;5'ccNicoleDeanRoommateAgreementD.E214-36.

17.Disputed.Seeresponseto#19(below).

18.Dksputed.PlaintiffssubmittedmultipledocllmentstoBHM CA regarding,BrittanyRogers.

PlaintiffssubnlittedrenG ldocllm entstoBHM CA andweredeniedand/orrefused.Following

theirrefusaltoacceptRogers'renGlapplication,Derhem subxnittedavisitorapplicationand

paid$50toreservetheelevatoruponhermove-intothetmitindicatingRogers'nnivingon

4/24/19.Defensesignedthedocllm entinagreem entandacceptedthepaym ent.Onher

arrival,BHM CA finedPlaintiffsforRogersuseoftheserviceelevatordespitePlaintiffs'

paym entanddefense'sacceptanceSeeFA'JJ#-ZJandSeeExhibitD atPar.10and 11.

19.Disputed.Plaintiffs recognize thata violation wmsissued.BHM CA on 3/11/21refunded

thousandsofdollarsoffm esthatweregaudulently levied againstPlaintiffs.By andthrough

thereftm dofthesefm es.thedefenseadm itstothegaudulentnatureoftlzeirinitialfinesSee

ExhibitZen/frcdocument,SeeExhibitD atParagraphs7,61,<* 130,153,320,321. !

20.Disputed. De#ndants'Exhibit27,Doc.214-27,BHMCA000554-000559,reflectsthat

becauseofBoardactivityonApril24,2019,Ms.Derhem'srijhtstousebuildingamenities

would besuspendedon M ay21,2019. Theexhibitdem onstatestheillegality oftheactions

oftheBoard,aspm sllnnttotheBylawsoftheAssociationandFL StateLaw,anowner'sright

touseandaccesstobuildingam enitiescotlldonlybesuspendedifdelinquencyin paym entof

a monetary obligation totheA ssociation remained unpaid foraperiod ofninety days. See

sy/lwxofBayHouseMiamiCondominiumAssociation,Inc.,Defendants'Exhibit1,atSection

11rtil,atBHMCA000400,Doc.214-1,BHMCA000242-000401alsoSeeEx.D atPar.63,274

21.Disputed.Seeresponseto#19above.

22.Disputed.Nohenringnoticeisam ongthemtlltipledocumentscomprisingDefendants'Exhibit

28,Doc.214-28,BHM CA000406,BHM CA000525,BHM CA000526,.See response to #19

above.

23.Disputed.s'ceresponseto#19above.

24.Dksputed.Seeresponseto#19above.

25.Disputed.Seeresponseto#19above.

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 5 of 15
26.Dksputed.Seeresponseto #19above.M oreover,thereisnoreferencetoUnit3202in Board

m inutesofOctober22,2019.

27.Disppted.Seeresponseto#19above.M oreover,theincidentreportappendedtoExhibit32is

inadmissiblehearsay.

28.Disputed.Seeresponseto#19above.M oreover,theincidentreportappendedtoExhibit33is

inadmissiblehearsay.

29.Disputed.Seeresponseto#19above.M oreover,theincidentreportappendedtoExhibit34is

inadmissiblehearsay.

30.Disputed.UndisputedthattheagreementsreferencedintheStatem entofFactswereexecuted.

DisputedthattheM sociationandM anagem entCompanywerew illingtoreview ingoodfaith

occupancyapplicationsofrentersofUnit2605.See,e.g.,ExhibitG,WA tfcv/fofpaulaPando.

SeeExhibitD,page2,!,ç10,11,12,13.Moreover,Exhibit36supportsPlaintiffs'positionthat

theywereinperpeMlnlpursuitofroomm aterelationshipsandconkacts.

31.Disputed.Seeresponseto#19above.Althoughtheflningcommitteeapprovedthesubject

fmes,theAssociation andM anagem entCompanywereneverwillingto entertainoccupancy

applicationsâom potentialrentersofUnit2605.See,e.g.ExhibitG,Wf/zltzvfofpando

32.Disputed.AlthoughthecorrespondenceofNovember6,2019wmssentplnintiffsdisputethat

accesstonm enitiesweresuspended onN ovember6,2019.Accordingtotheletter,accessto

nmenitieswastoocctzriftheimposed fm eswerenotpaidwithin Rfivedays''. Assetoutin

responsetoSutem entofFacts#20,above,thisletterisanadditionalillustrationofthebehavior

oftheAssociationinterminatingaccesstoamenitiesforfailuretopayafmancialobligationto

theAssociationwhichhmsbeenpendingforlessth% ninety(90)daysinviolationofthe

Bylaw sofBayHouseM inm iCondominillm Association,IncandFL SGteLaw.SeeDoc.214-

1,atSectionfzt-(a)onBHMCA000400alsoseeSeeFL 720.305(3)(4.).

33.Undisputed,Although Derhem did makesuchafiling,Derhem dismissed herclaim sagainst

M s.Dean.M s.Derhem isadam antthatthe inter-personalissueswhich arose werea direct

resultofM T.Brum sted,M 2.VidalandBHM CA liesandm e pulations.M s.D erhem andM s.

Dean oftenspokeaboutthestrugglesandskesstheywerefacingtogetherduetoBHM CA and

otherdefendantsdeprivingthem ofaccesstoamerlitiesandconslnntharassmentSeeExhibitD

atpar.134,135,185.

6

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 6 of 15
34.Disputed.PlaintiffssoughtBHM CA approvalfortheirroomm atesandweredenied,ignored,

ortoldblatnntlythatsuchroomm aterentalswereprohibitedSeeExhibitYpages2,3,5,8,9,.

SeeExhibitD,page2,!à'10,11,12,13alsoSeeExhibitGatpars.4and5.

35.Disputed.M though there was an incidentreportdrafted,the contents ofthe reportare

inadmissiblehearsay.M oreover,Seeresponseto#19above.

36.Dlsputed.Although'l'heBoardimposedapetrelatedfmeonUrlit2605,Plaintiffsdisputeihat

units1901and 1105wereGnedforpetrelated violationsdlm'ng thesameBoardM eeting.

M oreover,Seeresponseto#19above.

37.Disputed.Seeresponseto#19above.

38.Disputed.Although there was an incidentreportdrafted,the contents of the reportare

inadmissiblehersay.M oreover,Seeresponseto#19above.

39.Dksputed.Althoughtmdisputedthattherewasanincidentreportdrafted,thecontentsExhibit

44 resectfewer than the three required comm ittee m embers legally needed in orderto

implementafineagainsttheplaintifrs.M oreover,Seeresponseto #19above.

40.Dlputed.UndisputedthataN oticeofHearing forahearing to beheld on M arch 19,2020,

wasprovidedtoUnit2605.DeniedthatanySneswereimposed onM rch 5,2020. Seecited

exhibit.Seeresponseto#l9above.

41.Disputed.undisputedthataNoticeofHenn'ngforahearingtobeheldonM arch 19,2020was

provided to Urlit2605.Denied thatany fineswere im posed on M arch 5,2020. See cited

exhibitSeeresponseto#l9above.

42.Disputed.undisputedthataNoticeofHearingforahenringtobeheldonM arch 19,2020was

provided to Unit2605.Denied thatany fineswere imposed on M arch 5,2020. See cited

exhibit.Seeresponseto#19above.

43.Disputed.UndisputedthataNoticeofHearingforaheadngtobeheldonM arch 19,2020was

providedtoUnit2605.Deniedthatanyfineswereim posedonM arch5,2020.Seecitedexhibit.

Seeresponseto #19above.

44.Dksputed.UndisputedthataNoticewassent.Seeresponseto#19above.

45.Disputed.undisputedthatthesubjectletterwasprovidedtoUnit2605.Disputedthatthefines

werelegitimately imposed asM s.Derhem wasnotpermitted toparticipatein thehearing of

March19,2020SeeMulerAy davit,ExhibitH Theexhibitdemonskatestheilegalityofthe

actionsoftheBoard,aspursllnnttotheBylawsoftheAssociation,anowner'srighttouseand

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 7 of 15
accessto btlilding am enities could only be suspended ifa delinquency in paymentofa

monetmy obligation totheAssociation remainedunpaid foraperiod ofninety days. See

Sy/tpfaofBayHouseMiamiCondominiumAssociation,Inc.,Doc.214-1,atSectionfz:r(a),

BHMCA000400;SeeFL720.305(33(41.).Theletteradvisesthataccesstoamenitieswouldbe

suspendedifthefmein questionwmsnotpaidin fivedays.Seeresponseto #19above.

46.Disputed.Plaintiffin heranswersto interrogatory 14,Doc.214-16,acknowledgeshaving

rentersasco-occupants(roommates)dtlringportionsofheroccupancyinUnit2605.That

interp gatoryspecifically msksaboutrentersofthelmit- notrentersconfmedtoabedroom or

roomm ates.In fact,renterswere permitted ttse and access ofthe entire apar% entascooccupants/roommates,whileeachoccupanthaduseoftheirownbedroom .See,e.g.,lease

agreementofBritanyRogers,Doc.214-23,BHMCA000001-000008;SeeExhibit214-36,.See

responseto#19above.

47.Disputed.M s.Derhem ranfortheboardusinghernameasttKanayoDerhem .''Theapplication

thatBHM CA circulatedtopetitionapplicantstonm fortheboardneverindicatedthatthenam e

m ustmatch thenameon the deed.M oreover,M r.JoronneJeter'snam ewasalsom isspelled

and,presllm ably,them isspelled nam edidnotm atch thenam eon Jeter'sdeed.Astheonly

black candidates,BHM CA and Bnlmsted purposely misrepresented M s.Derhem and MT.

Jeter'snamesSeeExhibitD atpar.171,279,291,170,278.

48 t.

. Undlsputed.

49.Undisputed,although thelossisatlribuGbletoBnzm sted andBHM CA 'Songoing schem eto

discdm inateandslanderPlaintiffs.SeeExhibitD atpar.282

50.Disputed.M thoughitistruethataconsentorderwmsentered,itwasenteredbecauseBHM CA

and Bnlm sted purposely ignored Derhem 'srequestsso astoperpem atetheirdiscrim ination

and to preventDerhem access to records of which Bnlmsted and BIIM CA considered

incriminating.SeeExhibitD atpar.141,317,318,319

51.Disputed.AccordingtoDefense,BHM CA andKW PM have/hadan agentrelationsllip with

BHM CA and,tltimately,BHMCA is/wasresponsiblefora11actionstakenby KWPM;

therçfore,BHM CA isstillresponsibleforthem aintenanceofrecordsSeeD.E.214-1page9

par.3.

1htn://www.lea.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?Apn mode=Disnlav Statute&URL=0700-

0799/0720/Sections/0720.305.html

8

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 8 of 15
52.Dksputed.Dtuing2019Plaintiffsmadesubstantialmssessmentfeepayments;On 11/5/2019,

Vidalsentan emailtoDerhem confirming açzero balance''fortheaccotmtlegerSeeExhibit

B, Resident Transaction Reporti 000008, 000021-23. Furtherm ore, al1 liens for lmpaid

assessmentswereeitherreleasedbytheAssociationorpermittedtoexpireSeeSatisfactionof

Lien,lastdocumentinExhibitL Som epaym entssenttotheAssociationwerenotpromptly

depositedleadingtotheappearanceofdelinquentassessmentobligations.Seeemail#om

Associationattorneys,Exhibit./pp.1-2,acknowledgingmisplacementandA /tz.pindepositing

Plainto 'payments.SeeExhibitD atpar.82,139,174,208,224,231,JJT,240,285,286.

53.Disputed.M n Bm mstedhad thevellicletowed asRabandonedo''M oreover,thevehiclewas

subjecttoastatutoryusuaryviolation andMs.Derhem wasinthemidstofapdvateand

personalcomm ercialdisputew1t11lenderregarding snm eSeeDerhem W.#)ExhibitD,p.45,

!!J'294-299.

54.Disputed.M r.Brum sted asked questionsdllring theinitialinterview specilcally addressing

M s.Derhem 'sgenderidentitySeeDerhem W.#J,ExhibitD atpar.77,221,292,15,164,217.

55.Dksputed.Otherresidentsnotsharing M s.Derhem 'sracialand kansgenderidentity,were

permitted- even assisted- by M r.BnlmstedandBHM CA inprocllringrenters/room mates.

Seeazl-f/zltzvf.çofKavirRambharatiExhibitE;W-f/Wtzvfofsebastianfrtzyw/lcw,ExhibitF;

Derhem W.#2#tzWf,ExhibitD,p.5,!!J'J5-JP.

56.DksputedUndisputed,regardingBnlmsted'scalingDerhem a&nmonkey''ExhibitD,p.9,!f61,

67,80,93,179,267.Disputed,how ever,regarding Bm m sted'sm uliplereferencesto M s.

Derhem asaRdisgrace''SeeExhibitD atpar.50,78,88,135,185alsoseeExhibitN atP.7.

57.Undisputed,w1t11thequalitk ationthatPlaintifsmaintainthattherewas,indeed,aviolation.

58.Undisputed,althoughthecontentconv nedthereinisofdispute.

59.Undisputed,althoughthecontentcontminedthereinisofdispute.

60.Disputed.KW PM terminateditscontractduetoissuesw 111Bram sted,includhlg,accusations

ofsexualhar%sment.JoelGonzmlezandM s.Grace(lastnameunknown)advisedDerhem of

same.SeeExhibîtS;SeeExhibitD atpar.40+,102,105,7p* 148,7#* 246.

61.Undisputed.

62.Undisputed.

'

63.Disputed.Ferreiraalsointeractedw1t11plaintiffsby way oflettertoplaintiffsconfirmingthe

im position ofâaudulentfm esSeeExhibitD atpar160-162.

9

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 9 of 15
64.Disputed.Ferreira'snm davitisnotnolarized.Vidal,on an occasion when Derhem visited

VidalinhisofGce,confronted Derhem with apre-transitionphotographof.

Derhem asam an

andtwistedllisfaceinadisparagingwayto suggestDerhem should notrun fortheboard.lt

w asapparent9om thisinteraction thatV idalwœs aware ofDerhem 'stransgender identity

Derhem a4-#2#tzWl,ExhibitD,p.21,!7J7,281.

PLM NTIFFS'STATEM ENT OFADDITIONM ,FACTS

65.Thecompensationdefensehmsofferedforsettlementissu'premelyinsum cienttocovertlze

massiveinjuriesincurredbyPlaintiss.PlaintiffsseekpunitivedamagesExD,P.50,!JJ7.

66.Brumsted'sclaimsofhospiulizationhaveyettobesubstantiatedExhibitD,p.7,!43

67.Brum stedisoAenintoxicatedaroundtheBHM CA property;w asoAenintoxicatedduringtim es

ofBHM CA m eetingsand isknown to getverbally belligerent.Hewasarrested on charges

relatingtohisintoxication.Derhem a4.fJ',Exhibit.D,p.7,!#J

68.Brum stedm adefalsetestim onyregardingtheunlawfuldeletion ofhisem ailsupon

knowledgeoftllislawsuit.Bnzm stedw msawareofthispendinglawsuitwhenhedecidedto

deletehisBHM CA em ailaccotmt.Derhem W.#.',Exhibit.D,p.31,!207

69.SiegfriedRiveraadm ittedPlaintiffs'checkshadbeenm isplaced andnotaddedtotheir

ledger.DefendantsfiledgaudlzlentliensagainstthePlaintiffs.Everylieneverleviedagainst

Plaintiffs'llnithmseitherbeenreleasedorhasexpiredduetoBHM CA 'Sfailuretoact.

D erhem W.#J,Exhibit.D,p.31,!(209alsoSeeExhibitB,Landl(entiredocuments).

70.BHMCA hasnotamendedDeclaration@ SectionXIL3,p.13.Plaintiffswouldnotbe

subjecttosuchalateramendment;Plainiffswouldbegrandfatheredintothepriorrules

governingrentalsSeeFLStatute4-718.110(13t l4)alsoSeeExhibitD atPar.326.

71.ChadesBnzmstedentertainedanimusandprejudiceagainsttransgenderpeopleincludingMs.

Derhem ;againstblacks;andagainstM uslim s.SeeExhibitK,discriminatorysocialmediaposts

also SeeExhibitD atpar.19.Bnzmsted'ssuspicionsthatM s.Derhem wasa transgender

woman was exhibited during his initialinterview * 11 Plaintiffsregarding theirjoint

application for occupancy when he asked Derhem whether she could have children and

com mentingthatthecondomirlium wasEtfamily orientated''suggestingthatitwouldnotbea

goodfitforsom eonelikeM s.Derhem .D erhem W.#J,ExhibitD,p.33,!221.

72.BnzmstedistmabletojustifyMsFacebookpostsasanythingotherth% expressionsof

discrim inatoryrmim usSeeExhibitD atpar.8,44,19.

10

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 10 of 15
73.A wiG ess,whoiscurrently employedbyBHM CA,hascom eforth andhassigneda

statem entin advanceofthei.rim pendingresignation.'Ihiswim ess,upontheirimpending

resignation,hasdetailedtheirintenttobeafactwim essattrial.TheirstatementisExhibitX

74.M r.Brum sted'sracialanimuswasfurtherdisplayedfollowingtheDecem ber30,2019,Gning

com mitteem eeting.Attheconclusion ofthemeeting,Bntm sted chastisedPinkertandPerez

fornotconflnningBoard-imposedfmesagainstMs.Derhem (Imit2605)andduringlistirade

characterizedM s.Derhem asaçim onkcy.''Derhem W.#3#twf,ExhibitD,p.39,!!,ç266,267,

268,26% pagegparagraph61.

75.Inllisam davit,DefendantPinkertdoesnotdenythefactspresentedwithinthe

aforementionedparagraph.Derhem W.#3llWf,ExhibitD,pagegparagraph62

76.Priortopurchasing theirUrlit2605,Plaintiffsconflrmedthroughtheirrealtorthatrenting an

owner-occupiedImittoco-inhabitrmtsatBay HouseM inmiCondom inillm wasnotprohibited

bytherulesandregulationsoftheBayHouseMiamiCondomilzilzm.DerhemW//zlcv/tExhibit

D,p.2,!#,10,11,.ExhibitLemailskomMs.JuliaHall,realtor.

77.Nonzleorregulation ofBHM CA prohibitedtherentingofan owner-occupiedtmitto athirdpartyco-inhabilzmtrenter(roommate).De#ndants'Exhibitl0,Declarationofcondominium,

SectionsAWf@3,.SectionXff!/1,8,15,.SectionAà'ff!2,Doc.214-10.AlsoseeExhibit#:

78.Afterassllmingoccupancy ofUnit2605,BHM CA andKW PM refusedto acceptapplications

f'rom potentialco-habitantrentersofUnit2605intentionallyprecluding com pliancewiththe

regulationsgoverninglmitrentals.D erhem W.#;ExhD,p.2,!!7p,11,12.SeeExhibitG,!J.

79.CharlesBrum sted,actingasPresidentoftheAssociation,advised M s.Derhem thatshewas

notpermittedto rentherowner-occupied lmitto thirdparty co-habitants.D erhem al.#2#JWt

ExhibitD,p.13,!W,82,83,.p.22,!./42alsoSeeExhibitYpages2,3,5,8,9.

80.ChadesBnlm stedinducedtheBHM CA Boal'dofDirectorstorepeatedlyandâaudulentlyfm e

Derhem andherlmit2605forhavingçilegal''renters.SeeDoc.214-26,minutesofBoard

meetings,atpp.BHMCA000167-000170,andBHMCA000180.SeeExhibitD,p.5,!J#.

81.In conkastto M r.Bnlm sted's cnm paign to preventrenGloflmit2605 to co-inhabitants

: (roommates),Bnlmstedassistedotherresidentsinptlrsuingthesnmepracfce,i.e.rentingto

l

co-habitants/roomm ates.'Fheresidentsin question werenotkansgenderblack females.See

A'tzpfrAy davitiExhibitE;Srtzyw/lzrkpAy davit,ExhibitF;DerhemW.#z#trvf,ExhibitD,page

13,!81,82,83,84,85,86,.page22,!.ç142,143,'page23,!157,158,.page38,!261.

i

11

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 11 of 15
82.M ai festationsofracialand genderanimusdirected by Bramsted toward Kanayo Derhem

includetmpleasantcoO ontationsw1t11M s.Derhem inthecomm onaremsofthebuilding;See

AffldavitofMichaelBrown,Exhibit.M.RepeatedlycharacterizingDerhem asaGdisgraceto

thebuilding,''seeDerhem W.#)ExhibitD,atp.13,!7.9,.p.21,TJJJ;calingthepolicetoMs.

Derhem'slmit,suggestingthatshe(despitebeingtheowner)hadnorighttobethere.See

ExhibitD atp.22,!J#6,'p.3,!.!ZalsoseeExhibitFi

83.AnexampleofM T.Bnzm sted'ssllmm oningthepoliceandreferringtoKanayoDerhem asa

disgraceisanincidentinvolvingM s.Derhem 'sclesninglady. Through am istmderstanding,

the clenning lady had notreceived herZelle paym ent. Dtlring the subsequentencounter

between M s.Derhem and the clenning lady,M n Brumsted gotinvolved and police were

slmmoned.TheencounterwasrecordedbyDerhem..?1transcrètoftherecordingisfound

atExhibitN.DuringtheencotmterM r.Bm m stedreferredtoM s.Derhem asaRdisgTacetothe

building''in thepresence ofthepolice ofdcer. Nopin-sitehasbeenprovided asthe endre

transcriptneedstobereadtoJlvcasenseoftheencounter.SeeExhibitD atp.13,!Z#

ActionsofVidaland K'W PropertvM anazem ent.LLC

84.W ith the knowledge of ChadesBnlm qted,KW Property M anagem ent,LLC,the building

m anagement com pany, refused to provide concierge services to Kanayo Derhem .See

frcnxcrfrfofarecordingmadeduringanencounterbyMs.Derhem withthekontdeskclerk

SaraLopera,employeeofthemanagementcompany,whoannouncedherunwilingnessto

provideservicestoMs.Derhem Transcript.Exhibit0.pages1-4:ofnoteisthepresenceof

CharlesBrumstedtotheincidentwhoadvisedMs.DerhemherefusedtoassistMs.Derhem.

85.On December25,2019,M s.Derhem 'sm otherwmsvisiting herdaughterKanayoD erhem at

BayHouseM inm iCondominillm .Dllringthatvisit,on Chrisûnasday,Derhem andherm other

!

; Dr.AnneOnyekwuluje,wereatthebuildinggontdesk,wlichwmsmannedbySaraLoperw a

' KW PM employee.W hen M s.Derhem soughtto reG eve a package atthe âontdeskoM s.

LoperarefusedtoserveM s.Derhem ,nnnotmcingthathersupervisorslœ ew and approvedof

herrefusaltointeractwithM s.Derhem.SeeExhibitP,W.#2#cWfofDr.Onyekwuluje,at!1p.

86.On m any occ% ions,the managem entcompany,Brumsted,VidalaIICI/orBHM CA would

disable M s.Derhem 'sFOB precluding heraccessto herUnit,by preventing heruseofthe

elevator.SeeDerhemDepositionTestimony,Sept.15,2021,DefDoc.214-3,p.201,lines22-

12

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 12 of 15
JJ;p.203,lines9-12,.p.204,lines7-23,.p.208,lines1-25,.p.209,line1alsoSeeExhibitD

atPar.67+,119,159,275,276.

87.Onoccasion,M s.Derhem wasexcluded from thebuilding.See80,supra.Itisaviolation of

theBylaw softheAssociation and FL Law to deny an ownerofaccessto theowner'sUnit.

Seesy/tzwwoftheBayHouseMiamiCondominium,DejknseExhibit1,Sectionxg(a),BHMCA

0004000,D.E.214.SeeExhibitD atpar.67+,119,159,275,J7* 277.

88.ln herinteractionswith M r.Vidal,VidalwasoAen hostile. On oneoccasion,when M s.

Derhem wenttoVidal'soo ce,Vidalbeganscream ingatherandcalledthepolice.ExhibitD,

Derhem W-#zltzWf,page21,!136.

89.On oneoccmsion when M s.Derhem wenttoM r.Vidal'sofficetoask a question,M r.Vidal

confrontedM s.D erhem withapre-transitionphotograph,procm edfrom aninternetsearch,of

M s.Derhem depicted as a man. In displaying the photograph,M r.Vidalregistered his

repulsion atM s.Derhem 'skansgenderidentitythroughhostilefacialandbodily contortions

registeringhisdisgustandwithinanattem pttodissuadeDerhem from nmningfortheBHM CA

BOD.ExhibitD,DerhemAy davit,atpage21,!137.

90.Bnlm stedandVidalroutinelydiscom agedpotentialrentersfrom rentingatUnit2605,falsely

claimingthatthelmitownerswereonthevergeofforeclosure,wereengagedinillegality,were

Snancially irresponsible,and characterizing Derhem asadisgraceto thebuilding. Derhem

W-#2llWf,Exh.D,Page14,!88andpage46par.303.

91.On 11/8/19,KW PM sentalettertoBHM CA nott'fyingBHM CA oftheirintenttowithdraw

asthepropertym anagementcompanyfortheassociationfollowingissuessurrounding

certainallegedclaim sofsexualharmssmentstem mingf'rom interactionsbetween Joel

Gonz-ralezandM r.Brlzm stedSeeExhibitD atparagraph 102,104,105,106,107,108,109,

111,112,246

;

Denialofaccesstocom m on areaam enities.

92.Commencing in 2019,the occupantsofUnit2605wereconsistently andperpefllnlly denied

accessto comm onareaam enitieswitllin Bay HouseM inm iCondominium ,forfailm etopay

fmes'Gçwithinfivedays''ofimposition. SeeDe#nseD.E.214-38alsoSeeExD atpars.186i7,*

93.susp'ension ofaccessto am enitiesrequiresatlemstninety daysofdelinquency in paying a

fmancialobligation to the Association.SeeBHMCA By Ztzww,DefenseExhibit1,See

De#ndants'Exhibit1,atSectionf.xr(a)BHMCA 000400,D.E.214

13

,

'

I ,'

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 13 of 15
94.Denialofaccesstonm enitieswascontinuousforaperiodofapproxim atelytwoyearsorm ore,

preventinganyoccupantofUnit2605from accessingbuildingnm enitiessuch asthepooland

thegym .SeeExhibitD,Derhem W.#llWf,atpage9,!63alsoSeeExD atpars.186i187,188

95.Exclusion âom nmenitiescontinued from 2019 through the Spring of2022 when thefobs

issued to Unit2605 were reactivated permitting occupantsofUnit2605 to accessbuildihg

nmeities.D erhem W.#zltzv#,ExhibitD,page37,!â'JJp,JJJ,JJJ.

EffectofBrum stedResienation

96.CharlesBnlm stedresignedasPresidentofBHM CA inJuly2020.OnJuly 14,2020BHM CA

filedan Amended AnnualReportretlecting anew presidentoftheAssociation.SeeExhibit

:,AmendedFinalReport.

97.Following theresignation ofBrlzm sted,Plaintiffs'practice ofrenting owneroccupied Unit

2605toco-occupants/roommatesconthmedtmchanged.ExhibitD,p.37,!J##.

98.FollowingBrlzm sted'sresignationaspresidentoftheAssociation,Unit2605hasreceivedonly

fourfnes,none(0)in2022.ExhibitD,DerhemWA ltzvf,page37,!247,248.

99.Deniàlofaccesstocomm onareanm enitiesthroughthedisablingoffobsendedinM arch2022

wherifobsissuedtoUnit2605werereactivated.ExhibitD,p.37,!!252,253.

100. DllringBnzm sted'stentlreasPresidentoftheAssociationoUnit2605receivedm orefm es

thananyotherlmitinthebuilding.ExhibitD,p.37,!259.SeealsoDoc.214-26,muldple

minutesofmeetingoftheBoardofDirectors,imposingfnesonvariousunits.Byreviewing

eachofthesetsofminutes,onemaycalculatetherelativekequencyofimpositionofnneson

variousunitsandnotethetotalamountimposedagainstPlainto 'Unit,2605.

101. On M arch 11s2021,the A ssociation credited the account of Unit 2605 rescinding

thousandsofdollarsofpreviously % sessed fines,including fm esrelated to alleged Rillegal

renters'',in effectacknowledgingtheimpropriety ofthefmesandrelated sanctionsimposed

duringBnlm sted'stenureasPresidentoftheAssociation.SeeExhibitB,ResidentTransaction

ReportatPl.000023alsoSeeExhibitZ(entiredocumeno

Effectofharassm enton Derhem

102. Asaresultoftheharassm entexperiencedwllileresidinginUlzit2605,M s.Derhem becnme

severely depressed;expedencedweightgain;lzighbloodpressure;and otherkaum ainduced

emotionaldiskessandhercontem plationofsuicide.SeeDerhem yl.#2#cWfExhibitD,p.1,!!

#,J,7,'#,!14,'seeOnyekwulujeW.f#JtzvfIExhibitP,!!##,5,7,8and10.

14

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 14 of 15
CERTIFICATION OF COU LIANCE

UNDERSIGNED PLAIN TIFFcertifesthatinprepnn'ngtheResponsestoDefendants'

Statem entofUndisputedFacts,andinPlaintiffs'additionalfacts,Plaintiffshavecom pliedwith

theapplicableprovisionsofRule56.1,LocalRulesfortheUrlitedStatesDisd ctCourt,Southem

DistrictofFloddaasweredetailedbyPlnintiffs'Counsel,M r.RogerSchindler.

CERTIFICATE OF SERW CE

Ihereby certifythatatrueandcorrectcopy oftheforegoingwmsservedviaCM /ECF on

October14,2022onal1collnAelorpartiesofrecordontheServiceListbelow.

By: IsM s.Kana oDerhem/s/

Plaintiff . -xSERW CE LIST

EvelynGreenstoneKnmm et

Vernis,BowlingofM inm i,P.A.

1680NE 1351 Street

M iam i,FL 33181

egreenstone@florida-lam com

CounselforDe#ndantsBHMCA,Sean

Zahniser,JamesPinkert,AlejandroEnrique,

UtereraBadenesandJoshuaPaul

CraigJ.Shankm an

W illiam Thom msLeveille,11

BoydltichardsParker& Colonnelli,P.L.

100 SE 2nd SteetaSttite2600

M inm i,FL 33131

cshnnkman@boydlawgroup.com

wleveillelboydlawgroup.com

CounselforCharlesBrumste4 Jr.

JeannieA.Liebegot Esq.

JoelleJ.Vogel,Esq.

M arshallDennehey W arnerColem an

& Goggin,P.C.

l00N .E.3rdAvenue,Suite1100

FortLauderdale,FL 33301

JALiebegott@mdwcg.com

JW ogel@mdwcg.com

CounselforDe#ndantsKWproperty

Management,ZZC,JoseVidal,and

JoseFerreira

15

Case 1:20-cv-22318-KMW Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 15 of 15