alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<LEGEND>
                This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted
                from  Quantitative  Methods  Corporation June 30, 2000 financial
                statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                    0000894561
<NAME>                   Quantitative Methods Corporation
<CURRENCY>               CANADIAN


<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000

<EXCHANGE-RATE>                     .67600

<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        10,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     149,918
<PP&E>                                               144,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                       101,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       217,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                675,414
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             15,475
<OTHER-SE>                                           (473,556)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         217,333
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     84,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8,153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (84,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (84,875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (84,875)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.01)



</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Federalcomputer security report card [electronic resource]**** 
SuDoc:Y 4.G 74/7:G 75/
ItemNumber:1016-B(online)
CGPsystem Number: 000579175
 
2000-2003
2003
2004
 **
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Laster, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Sacramento

River

TTEE HHAA MM AA CC OO

T27N R3W

9

3 4

10

16 15

8

5 2

11

17 14

36

197.0 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-2519A-R-1

Exhibit B

J. B. Unlimited, Inc.

725-202-75

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5

Miles

Date: November 9, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\jb_unlimited_inc\jb_unlimited_inc.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
§ 112.9 Compliance information. ( a ) *Cooperation and assistance.* SBA shall to the fullest extent practicable seek the cooperation of applicants and recipients in obtaining compliance with this part and shall provide assistance and guidance to applicants and recipients to help them comply voluntarily with this part.
( b ) *Compliance reports.* Each applicant or recipient shall keep such records and submit to SBA timely, complete and accurate compliance reports at such times, and in such form and containing such information, as SBA may determine to be necessary to enable SBA to ascertain whether the applicant or recipient has complied or is complying with this part. In the case of a small business concern which receives financial assistance from a development company or from a small business investment company, such concern shall submit to the company such information as may be necessary to enable the company to meet its reporting requirements under this part.
( c ) *Access to sources of information.* Each applicant or recipient shall permit access by SBA during normal business hours to such of its books, records, accounts, and other sources of information, and its facilities as may be pertinent to ascertain compliance with this part. Where any information required of an applicant or recipient is in the exclusive possession of any other agency, institution or person and this agency, institution or person shall fail or refuse to furnish this information, the applicant or recipient shall so certify in its report and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain this information.
( d ) *Information to the public.* Each recipient shall make available to persons entitled under the Act and under this part to protection against discrimination by the recipient such information as SBA may find necessary to apprise them of their rights to such protection.
[30 FR 298, Jan. 9, 1965, as amended at 38 FR 17934, July 5, 1973]
#### United States Title Guaranty Company, Respondent, v. Arthur A. Brown, Appellant.

Motion denied, without costs. Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

*CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350*

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-KSB for the annual period ended April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John H.Jungbauer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2.                                       the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:  July 29, 2004 | By                      | /s/  John H. Jungbauer |   |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                       | John H. Jungbauer       |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### § 4300.59 If I want to assign my permit to another party, when must I notify BLM?

You must file a proposed assignment of your permit, in whole or in part, in duplicate with BLM within 90 days of the assignment execution date. No particular format is required. The assignment is effective when BLM approves it.
§ 108.2020 Amount of Operational Assistance grant. ( a ) *Amount of grant to NMVC Company.* NMVC Companies are eligible for an Operational Assistance grant award equal to the amount of matching resources raised by the NMVC Company in accordance with §§ 108.380(a)(1)(i)(B) and 108.2030.
( b ) *Amount of grant to SSBIC.* SSBICs are eligible for an Operational Assistance grant award equal to the amount of matching resources raised by the SSBIC in accordance with §§ 108.2007 and 108.2030.
( c ) *Pro rata reductions.* In the event that the total amount of funds available to SBA for purposes of making Operational Assistance grant awards to NMVC Companies and SSBICs is not sufficient to award grants in the amounts described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, SBA will make pro rata reductions in the amounts otherwise awarded to each such NMVC Company and SSBIC.
[66 FR 28609, May 23, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 68505, Nov. 12, 2002]
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hiking Alkali Flat Trail

White Sands National Park
(No. 828

Claimant awarded. $66.50.)

#### Dixon Water Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September*17, *1924.*

Governmental *function*— state *not liable for negligence of its employees.*The State in conducting the State Colony for Epileptics at Dixon, exercises a government function and' is not liable for the negligence of its employees therein.

*Reimbursement*— when *award may be made.*While- the State is not liable for the negligence of its employees, yet an award may be made to claimant to reimburse him for damage occasioned by the negligence of its employee.

Henry C. Warner, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The declaration in this case states that the Dixon Water Company, of Dixon, Illinois, a corporation, complains to the State of Illinois that on, to-wit, the 22nd day of September, A. D. 1923, an automobile truck belonging- to the State of Illinois and used in and about the conduct of the State Colony for Epileptics at Dixon, Illinois, was being operated in one of the streets of Dixon, Illinois, near the corner of Fifth street *40and Depot avenue; that said automobile truck was then and there being operated by an employee of the State of Illinois; that said automobile truck then and there being operated by said employee was so carelessly operated that one of the hydrants at the intersection of Fifth street and Depot avenue in said city was damaged and broken and a large quantity of water was necessarily wasted and it became and was necessary fqr the Dixon Water Company to replace said hydrant which was broken and shut off the water from the water mains belonging to the claimant in that vicinity in order to install a new hydrant in the place of the hydrant which was broken.

The claimant further alleges that the fair market value of the new hydrant so installed was the sum of $57.50 and that said claimant was compelled to employ two men for one day to install said new hydrant, and that said men were paid the sum of $9.00 f.or services performed by them.

The Attorney General filed a demurrer, which, as a matter of law, is sustained by the court.

The Attorney General also filed his consent to an award, stating that the case had been thoroughly investigated under the direction of the director of public welfare, that such investigation showed the facts are clearly set forth in the declaration.

The Attorney General therefore consents to an award in this case in favor of the claimant in the sum of $66.50.

The court therefore makes an award to said claimant in the sum of $66.50.
Exhibit 4.417

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182089 dated June 17, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until June 17, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 06, 2020 No. 145-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
    	
 
    
	
COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
    	
 
    
	
IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS,
    	
 
    
	
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119147
From: Torr, Graham [mailto:GrahamT@havilandusa.com]

Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:40 PM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: RE: ST reduction Agents / PFOS etc.

The old PFOS products generally sold for approx. the same price ..(give or take)...but they lasted much

longer in solution. Typically 2

- 4 times as long (approx.).

All products are used based on their ability to maintain surface tension and their withstand breakdown

in what is essentially a hostile environment (CrVI) rather tha n usage through amp hours.

GT

From: Hancy, Cindy Wang [mailto:chancy@rti.org]

Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:17 PM

To: Torr, Graham

Subject: RE: ST reduction Agents / PFOS etc.

Graham,

Thanks again for sending this information. I have just a few more questions. I know it is difficult to figure

out an estimate of cost per unit of production (e.g. dollar per amp hour) but if you have any estimate of

this it would be great. Also, did Haviland at any point sell PFOS based wetting agents? If so, is there an y

way I could get that pricing even if it is out of date? Have a wonderful weekend.

Thanks,

Cindy Wang Hancy

RTI International

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541

- 6623

Fax: (919) 316

- 3420

From: Torr, Graham [mailto:Graham T@havilandusa.com]

Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 1:14 PM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: RE: ST reduction Agents / PFOS etc.

Cindy,

We currently don’t offer any truly “PFOS” material. The Chrome Mist Eliminator II is a C6 product which

means that it is les s stable (and therefore more desirable from a health / environmental

standpoint)....and the ne CRV1 Is a C4 material.

That being said, the Mist Eliminator II runs at about $100.00 / gal and the CRV1 (once approved by the

EPA) will be available for approx. $ 130.00 / gal.

Samples of both currently available for testing.

Regards,From: Hancy, Cindy Wang [mailto:chancy@rti.org]

Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 12:15 PM

To: Torr, Graham

Subject: RE: ST reduction Agents / PFOS etc.

Graham,

Thanks so much for sending this. What we are essentially trying to do is compare costs between PFOS

and non

- PFOS based mist eliminators. We are looking for the cost of the HPC Chrome Mist Eliminator II

and any PFOS based mist eliminator Haviland sells in terms of dollars/amp hour or whatever unit you

may have available. Is there any way you could send me this information?

Thanks,

Cindy Wang Hancy

RTI International

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541

- 6623

Fax: (919) 316

- 3420

From: Torr, Graham [mailto:GrahamT@havilandusa.com]

Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 11:58 AM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: ST reduction Agents / PFOS etc.

Hi Cindy,

I have attached the TDS for our “C6” material but also an introduction to our new “C4” material (as is

explained). We are very excited about this product and are happy to make material available to you for

testing etc.

Thank you for your interest.
#### Bank of Waynesboro *v.*Walters.

Holden, J.

1. An application for a continuance was made because of the absence of a non-resident witness, whose whereabouts the applicant had been unable to ascertain in time to obtain his interrogatories. The. movant testified that he had “no information as to how Mr. Walters [the absent witness] would testify,” but there were rumors that certain facts existed, and it was believed that the witness would “tell the truth under oath.” *Held,*that the court committed no error in refusing a continuance.

2. Under the ruling in *Mills*v. *Hudgins,*97 *Ga.*417 (24 S. E. 146), where the money of a married woman was paid to her husband’s creditor to settle a debt due to the creditor by her husband, and in consideration that a criminal prosecution against the latter would be stopped, she was entitled to recover the money so paid, the creditor having knowledge at the time of the payment that the money belonged to the wife.

3. Even though the wife did not demand the repayment of the money with which she discharged her husband’s debt until sometime subsequently to its payment, she could recover interest thereon from the time of its payment.

4. It is immaterial that when the wife demanded repayment she demanded a larger sum than she in fact paid, as she was entitled to recover without making any demand.

*644February 14, 1911.

Complaint. Before Judge Hammond. Burke superior court. December *2,*1909.

*P. P. Johnston*and *W. E. Fleming,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. E. Barrett, F. L. Brinson,*and *W. E. Davis,*contra.

5. The court correctly refused to instruct the jury as to the legal effect of a gift from a wife to her husband, there being no evidence to justify a charge on that subject.

6. Under the above rulings, the assignments of error in the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are without merit. The only ground's in the original motion are the general grounds. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and the court committed no error in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
**Exhibit 13.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Bayer AG(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                     Dated:March 15, 2007   /s/ Werner Wenning Name: Werner Wenning      Title:   Chairman of the Board of Management                Dated:March 15, 2007   /s/ Klaus Kühn Name: Klaus Kühn      Title:   Chief Financial Officer                  Member of the Board of Management
EXHIBIT 99.1



                          [BANK OF NEW YORK LETTERHEAD]

                                BANK OF NEW YORK

                              Officer's Certificate
                              ---------------------

                                 March 28, 2003



MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.
North Tower, 7th Floor
4 World Financial Center
New York, New York 10080

                   PREFERREDPLUS AND PPLUS TRUST CERTIFICATES

The undersigned, Kevin Cremin, Vice-President-Business Manager of The Bank of
New York, a New York corporation (the "Trustee"), hereby certifies in such
capacity that, based on his/her knowledge, the Trustee is in compliance with all
conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the Standard Terms for
Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill Lynch Depositor Inc. as
depositor (the "Depositor") and the Trustee, as successor to United States Trust
Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the "Securities
Intermediary"), in each case as amended by a series supplement between the
Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities Intermediary for each series of trust
certificates listed in the attached schedule.



                                       1
<PAGE>


                                                  Very truly yours,

                                                  BANK OF NEW YORK
                                                  not in its individual capacity
                                                  but as Trustee


                                                  By: /s/ Kevin Cremin
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                  Name: Kevin Cremin
                                                  Title:  Vice President



                                       2
<PAGE>


                                    SCHEDULE

Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 IBM Z-2 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 H-Z3 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 F-Z4 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 TRV-C1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 HLT-1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ATT-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series MSD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series UPC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FAR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GRC-1
PPLUS Trust Series PMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1


                                        3
<PAGE>
### [PART IV—REPEALED]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part IV, relating to effective date for subchapter, consisted of section 771 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(94), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1780.