alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from  delSECUR   CORPORATION   August  31,  2000  consolidated
                  financial  statements  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
                  reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                 0000894498
<NAME>                delSECUR CORPORATION
<CURRENCY>            Canadian dollars



<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                 AUG-31-2000

<EXCHANGE-RATE>                .67926

 <CASH>                         11,886
 <SECURITIES>                   0
 <RECEIVABLES>                  227,713
 <ALLOWANCES>                   0
 <INVENTORY>                    0
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>               260,094
 <PP&E>                         341,029
 <DEPRECIATION>                 212,755
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                 388,369
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          2,204,405
 <BONDS>                        0
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
 <PREFERRED>                    0
 <COMMON>                       20,531
 <OTHER-SE>                     (1,841,550)
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   388,369
 <SALES>                        0
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>               0
 <CGS>                          0
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                  0
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>               1,617,142
 <LOSS-PROVISION>               0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>             7,250
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                (1,617,142)
 <INCOME-TAX>                   0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>            (1,617,142)
 <DISCONTINUED>                 0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                0
 <CHANGES>                      0
 <NET-INCOME>                   (1,617,142)
 <EPS-BASIC>                    (.11)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                  (.11)



</TABLE>
AIR-15-1983-E; AIR-15-1984-E July 16, 2015

Mr. Charly Gaber Airworthiness & Certification Manager Gulfstream Aerospace LP

P.O. Box 1036 Airport City, Israel 7019900

Dear Mr. Gaber:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your two requests for exemptions, and explains why we cannot process your re quests for exemptions, from § 45.13(a)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

You entered two petitions for exemption on May 26, 2015, on behalf of Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Gulfstream) into the public docket (Nos. FAA-2015-1927, FAA-2015-1932), but we are unable to process your requests any furt her. The relief that you are seeking is from the requirement to include the name of the builder on the aircraft identification plate on

Gulfstream 150 and 280 models.

Specifically, § 45.13(a)(1) requires the name of the aircraft builder on an identification plate as set forth in § 45.11(a). As noted in your petition, both the Gulfstream 150 and 280 are manufactured by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). While Gulfstream owns the type certificate for both aircraft models, Gulfstream does not have standing to petition for an exemption for either model 150 or 280. Since the State of Manufacture for these models is Israel, IAI is not subject to § 45.13(a)(1), except in the case of export to the United States. If IAI did not want to place the builders name on the identification plate when exporting to the United States, then IAI would need to petition the FAA for an exemption to § 45.13(a)(1).2

In summary, Gulfstream, who may own the type certificate for the two aircraft models, does not have standing to petition for exemption in this case. In consideration of the forgoing, the FAA will take no further action on your two requests for an exemption from 14 CFR § 45.13(a)(1), and will close the docket on both petitions. If you have any questions, you may call Robert Cook, Aviation Safety Inspector, at (202)-267-1575.

Sincerely,

/s/

James M. Crotty Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division Office of Rulemaking
Order filed, October 25, 2017

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 17

- 00821

- CR

____________

MARIA CORONA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 66522



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 11, 2017. See Tex. R. App.

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the re porter’s record has not

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Robin Rios , the official court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                        5
<LEGEND>
              This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted
              from Skynet  Telematics,  Inc. June 30, 1999 financial  statements
              and is qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such  financial
              statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                            0000894557
<NAME>                                           Skynet Telematics, Inc.


<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1999

<CASH>                                                    139,827
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             32,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               129,405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          385,463
<PP&E>                                                    7,914,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (1,031,197)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            7,268,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     1,455,981
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  23,609
<OTHER-SE>                                                5,450,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              7,268,740
<SALES>                                                   63,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          63,936
<CGS>                                                     228,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             228,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          1,444,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        166,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (1,775,701)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (1,775,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (1,775,701)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (.08)



</TABLE>
### §4411. Imposition of tax

#### (a) In general

There shall be imposed a special tax of $500 per year to be paid by each person who is liable for the tax imposed under section 4401 or who is engaged in receiving wagers for or on behalf of any person so liable.

#### (b) Authorized persons

Subsection (a) shall be applied by substituting "$50" for "$500" in the case of—

(1) any person whose liability for tax under section 4401 is determined only under paragraph (1) of section 4401(a), and

(2) any person who is engaged in receiving wagers only for or on behalf of persons described in paragraph (1).

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 527; Pub. L. 93–499, §3(b), Oct. 29, 1974, 88 Stat. 1550; Pub. L. 97–362, title I, §109(b), Oct. 25, 1982, 96 Stat. 1731.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1982—Pub. L. 97–362 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), in subsec. (a), as so designated, substituted "liable for the tax imposed" for "liable for tax", and added subsec. (b).

1974—Pub. L. 93–499 substituted "$500" for "$50".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Pub. L. 97–362, title I, §109(c)(2), Oct. 25, 1982, 96 Stat. 1731, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (b) [amending this section] shall take effect on July 1, 1983."

#### Effective Date of 1974 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–499 effective Dec. 1, 1974, and applicable only with respect to wagers placed on or after such date, see section 3(d)(1) of Pub. L. 93–499, set out as a note under section 4401 of this title.

#### Persons Engaged in Activities on December 1, 1974, Requiring Payment of Tax; Persons Paying Tax and Registering Before December 1, 1974

Pub. L. 93–499, §3(d)(2), Oct. 29, 1974, 88 Stat. 1551, as amended by Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095, provided that:

"(A) Any person who, on December 1, 1974, is engaged in an activity which makes him liable for payment of the tax imposed by section 4411 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [formerly I.R.C. 1954] (as in effect on such date) shall be treated as commencing such activity on such date for purposes of such section and section 4901 of such Code.

"(B) Any person who, before December 1, 1974.—

"(i) became liable for and paid the tax imposed by section 4411 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as in effect on July 1, 1974) for the year ending June 30, 1975, shall not be liable for any additional tax under such section for such year, and

"(ii) registered under section 4412 of such Code (as in effect on July 1, 1974) for the year ending June 30, 1975, shall not be required to reregister under such section for such year."
### [§§5251, 5252. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(a)(38), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 286]

Section 5251, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1370; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834, required proprietors of distilled spirits plants to give notice of their intention to rectify or compound any distilled spirits or wines.

A prior section 5251, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 649, made a cross reference provision to "blending of beverage brandies in internal revenue bonded warehouses", prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

Provisions similar to those comprising section 5251 of this title were contained in prior section 5282(a), act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 651, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

Section 5252, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1370, set out cross references to other sections with regard to the regulation of operations.

A prior section 5252, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 649, related to "discontinuance of warehouse and transfer of merchandise", prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859. See section 5236 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 810 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as an Effective Date of 1979 Amendment note under section 5001 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5057 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5057

 To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to modify fees and 
   funding for certain small business refinancing loans and loans to 
qualified State or local development companies, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2022

Mr. Coons (for himself and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to modify fees and 
   funding for certain small business refinancing loans and loans to 
qualified State or local development companies, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``504 Loan Availability Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO FEES AND FUNDING FOR CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESS 
              REFINANCING LOANS AND LOANS TO QUALIFIED STATE OR LOCAL 
              DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES.

    Title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695 
et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 502(7)(C) (15 U.S.C. 696(7)(C))--
                    (A) in clause (ii)--
                            (i) in subclause (I), by adding ``and'' at 
                        the end;
                            (ii) in subclause (II), by striking ``; 
                        and'' and inserting a period; and
                            (iii) by striking subclause (III); and
                    (B) in clause (v), by striking ``a total of 
                $7,500,000,000 of financing'' and inserting ``the total 
                amount described in section 511 in financing''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 511. MAXIMUM FUNDING LEVEL.

    ``The Administrator may provide not more than a total, in the 
aggregate, of $15,000,000,000 for each fiscal year of financing to 
guarantee loans under section 503 and loans authorized under section 
502(7)(C).''.

SEC. 3. SUNSET.

    Effective on October 1, 2025, title V of the Small Business 
Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 502(7)(C) (15 U.S.C. 696(7)(C)), by striking 
        clause (v); and
            (2) by striking section 511, as added by section 2 of this 
        Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 4.805 Reduction of time to file documents.

For good cause, the responsible Departmental official or the administrative law judge, with respect to matters pending before him, may reduce any time limit prescribed by the rules in this part, except as provided by law or in part 17 of this title.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4992 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to extend the maximum period for 

which a company can be an emerging growth company from 5 years 

to 10 years. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to extend the maximum 

period for which a company can be an emerging growth 

company from 5 years to 10 years. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Startups Con5 tinue to Grow Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMERGING GROWTH COMPANY. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.— 

8 (1) SECURITIES ACT OF 1933.—Section 

9 2(a)(19)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4992 IS

1 U.S.C. 77b(a)(19)(B)) is amended by striking 

2 ‘‘fifth’’ and inserting ‘‘tenth’’. 

3 (2) SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.—Sec4 tion 3(a)(80)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

5 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(80)(B)) is amended by 

6 striking ‘‘fifth’’ and inserting ‘‘tenth’’. 

7 (b) RULEMAKING.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

9 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Securi10 ties Exchange Commission shall issue an interim 

11 final rule carrying out the amendment made by sub12 section (a). 

13 (2) DEFINITIONS.—In amending the definition 

14 of emerging growth company, as required under 

15 paragraph (1), the Securities Exchange Commission 

16 shall not make or solicit feedback on alterations to 

17 the definition of emerging growth company to nar18 row the definition or increase their regulatory obliga19 tions or restrictions of emerging growth companies. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
DB1/ 115833815.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

NICHOLAS PAVLAK, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE PEP BOYS-MANNY, MOE & JACK, 

INC. AND MCPHAIL ASSOCIATES, 

L.L.L.P., 

 Defendant. 

 / 

CASE NO. 9:20-cv-80934-RS 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

Defendants, The Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc. and McPhail Associates, L.L.L.P. 

(“Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby notify the Court that Plaintiff 

Nicholas Pavlak and Defendants (collectively, the “Parties”) have agreed to settle this matter. The 

Parties are in the process of memorializing the terms of the settlement in a written agreement, and 

anticipate filing a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal in the near future. 

Therefore, Defendants respectfully request the Court vacate all pending deadlines in this 

case. 

Case 9:20-cv-80934-RS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2020 Page 1 of 3
DB1/ 115833815.1 2 

Dated: September 2, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/ Beth S. Joseph 

Anne Marie Estevez 

 Florida Bar No. 991694 

 Email: annemarie.estevez@morganlewis.com

Beth Joseph 

 Florida Bar No. 0062952 

 Email: beth.joseph@morganlewis.com

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 

200 South Biscayne Boulevard 

Suite 5300 

Miami, FL 33131-2339 

Telephone: 305.415.3330 

Facsimile: 877.432.9652 

Counsel for Defendants 

CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on September 2, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system. I also certify that the foregoing 

document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the 

attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic 

Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who 

are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. 

/s/ Beth S. Joseph 

Beth S. Joseph 

Case 9:20-cv-80934-RS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2020 Page 2 of 3
DB1/ 115833815.1 3 

SERVICE LIST 

Anthony J. Brady, Jr., Esq. 

604 Banyan Trail 

P.O. Box 811362 

Boca Raton, Florida 33431 

Tel: 561.603.6387 

Ladbrady@gmail.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 9:20-cv-80934-RS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2020 Page 3 of 3
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Vietnam War





Contact Us
  America in Vietnam  American involvement in the Vietnam War began in the late 1950s, with ground troops arriving in 1965. The war was costly and controversial. Protests against American involvement, some held in national parks, became a defining element of the 1960s counterculture. By the time American forces withdrew from the conflict in 1973, more than 58,000 American lives were lost. Today the Vietnam Veterans Memorial on the National Mall in Washington, DC, honors the American men and women who served.
 Last updated: February 5, 2019
 Tools Calendar
Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
**DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATIONS**

**TO CHAIRMAN'S MARK**

**OF AN AMENDMENT TO S. 1133**

**("PARENT AND STUDENT SAVINGS ACCOUNT PLUS ACT")**
§ 422.9 Reclamation law enforcement contracts and cooperative agreements. ( a ) The LEA, or a person that the LEA designates, may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with Federal, State, local, or tribal law enforcement agencies to aid in enforcing or carrying out Federal laws and regulations on Reclamation facilities or Reclamation-managed property. Reclamation will rescind the contract or cooperative agreement if an elected governing body with jurisdiction over the local law enforcement agency adopts a resolution objecting to the use of that agency's personnel to enforce Federal laws.
( b ) Each contract and cooperative agreement authorizing the exercise of Reclamation law enforcement authority: ( 1 ) Must expire no later than 3 years from its effective date;
( 2 ) May be revoked earlier by either party with written notice;
( 3 ) May be revised or amended with the written consent of both parties;
( 4 ) Must expressly include the requirements for exercise of Reclamation law enforcement authority listed in § 422.10;
( 5 ) Must expressly state that the officer has completed the Federal Bureau of Investigation criminal history review as required by § 422.11; and
( 6 ) Must expressly include the standards of conduct listed in section 422.12.
#### § 106.303 Who has authority to approve and sign a Fee Based Record?

The Administrator, or upon his/her written delegation, the Deputy Administrator, an associate or assistant administrator, after consultation with the General Counsel (or designee), has the authority to approve and sign each Fee Based Record. This authority may not be re-delegated.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Southern District of Florida

Carlos A. Robinson, an individual.

Eduardo J. Requejo, individually.

Erik N. Good, individually.

Officer Eduardo J. Requejo

City of Ft. Luaderdale Police Department

1300 West Broward Boulevard

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33312

Tobechuku T. Nwahiri

Nwahiri Law, PLLC

13499 Biscayne Boulevard

Suite 107

Miami, Florida 33181

05/31/2020

0:20-CV-61067

Case 0:20-cv-61067-RAR Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/31/2020 Page 1 of 1