alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-15(e)/15d-15(e) I, John M. Meyer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PSF Group Holdings,
Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation:
and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: June 1, 2004/s/ John M. Meyer
John M. Meyer
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22383-CIV-WILLIAMS

MTACC LTD.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CHF CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’ 

report and recommendation (DE 42) on Defendants’ motion to set aside final default 

judgment (DE 31) (“Report”). In the Report, Judge Torres recommends GRANTING

Defendants’ motion (DE 31) and VACATING the September 15, 2020 Order granting in 

part Plaintiff’s motion for final default judgment against Defendants (DE 27). Plaintiff did 

not file objections to the Report and the time to do so has now passed. Upon an 

independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, it is ORDERED 

AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The conclusions in the Report (DE 42) are AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Defendants’ motion to set aside final default judgment (DE 31) is GRANTED. 

3. The Court’s September 15, 2020 Order (DE 27) is VACATED. 

4. Plaintiff’s renewed motion for attorney’s fees (DE 28) is DENIED AS MOOT. 

5. By no later than February 12, 2021, Defendants shall respond to the 

complaint. 

Case 1:20-cv-22383-KMW Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/22/2021 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 22nd day of January, 

2021.

Case 1:20-cv-22383-KMW Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/22/2021 Page 2 of 2
#### § 7.34 Procedural information for securing permits.

Information about procedures to secure a permit to excavate or remove archaeological resources from public lands or Indian lands can be obtained from the appropriate Indian tribal authorities, the Federal land manager of the bureau that administers the specific area of the public lands or Indian lands for which a permit is desired, or from the state, regional, or national office of that bureau.
§ 3594.3 Boundary pillars and isolated blocks. ( a ) If the ore on adjacent lands subject to the regulations in this part has been worked out beyond any boundary pillar, if the water level beyond the pillar is below the operator's/lessee's adjacent operations, and if no other hazards exist, the operator/lessee shall, on the written order of the authorized officer, mine out and remove all available ore in such boundary pillar, both in the lands covered by the lease and in the adjoining premises, when the authorized officer determines that such ore can be mined without undue hardship to the operator/lessee.
( b ) If the mining rights in adjoining premises are privately owned or controlled, an agreement may be made with the owners of such interests for the extraction of the ore in the boundary pillars.
( c ) Narrow strips of ore between leased lands and the outcrop on other lands subject to the regulations in this part and small blocks of ore adjacent to leased lands that would otherwise be isolated or lost may be mined under the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General
Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2013  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures Inc.





|Date: March 30, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|-------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                     |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Underwater
#### John Loftus, Respondent, v. Columbia Ribbon and Carbon Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order denying appellants’ motions to dismiss causes of action for assault, malicious prosecution and defamation, and to strike out certain allegations of the amended complaint, modified on the law by striking out everything following the words “ be and the same hereby ” in the first ordering paragraph and inserting in place thereof a provision granting the motions to the extent of dismissing all three causes of action as against the corporate appellant, and dismissing the first and third causes of action as against the individual appellant. As thus modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellants, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint against both appellants within ten days after the service of the order to be entered hereon. The respondent consents to the dismissal of the assault cause of action. The remaining allegations, largely conclusory, are insufficient to constitute causes of action for libel or slander, or to show that the corporate defendant participated in respondent’s prosecution. Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Calloway, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAN CHILIEAN,

Appellant,

v.

CHASE RUSSELL and GENESIS CAPITAL GROUP LLC,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-3222

[December 29, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Ellen Feld, Judge; L.T. Case No. COWE20-18368.

Jesse Long and Aylin Ruiz of Legal Grit, PLLC, Boca Raton, for 

appellant.

Frank Dello Russo and Yanina Ziberman of South Florida Law, PLLC, 

Hallandale Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 22, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00957

- CV

Kevin DOTY and Elizabeth Doty Individually and Severally

, Appel lant s

v.

Richard DAVIDSON , Javline Ranch (A General Partnership), AKA Javelin Ranch AKA Javelin Ranch L.P., Appellee s

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC

- 15

- 100 The Honorable Everardo Garcia, Judge Presidi ng



### O R D E R

The district clerk has filed a notification of late record stating that the clerk’s record has

not be en filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

Accordingly , it is ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the cle rk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fail s to respond within the time provided, this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of February, 2 019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit B

Permission/Waiver You have requested an aerial videography of your home by SKYBENDER AVIATION . In order to do so, SKYBENDER AVIATION requires your w ritten permission to enter your property in order to conduct an on - site survey of your property and it's surroundings; and to launch/fly an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) over your home and it's surroundings. This is absolutely necessary in order to conduct a safe flight. We w ill not proceed without written approval. SKYBENDER AVIATION will take every precaution to ensure that no damage occurs as a result of the flight. We reserve the right to cancel the flight at any time without penalty due to Force Majeure or Act of God. UAV damage can result from contact with any source such as landscaping, trees, utility poles and the house itself. While we pride ourselves on our professionalism and flying skill, there is always inherent danger in flig ht. A sudden and unexpected gust of wind could blow the UAV off its planned course. If the UAV contacts an object, it generally results in damage to the UAV. Minor property damage may occur. SKYBENDER AVIATION accepts no responsibility for any damage inc urred by your home or personal property as a result of the UAV flight of your home or property. You agree to hold harmless SKYBENDER AVIATION , it's owners and operators should any damage occur. SKYBENDER AVIATION retains sole ownership of all video shot on or around your property. We NEVER sell our video to you or any third party; rather we sell our expertise and video editing services. All rights reserved by SKYBENDER AVIATION

. We will issue you a license to display, upload and/or broadcast the final e dited version by you, your real estate agent/agency or any other entity designated by you in writing.

We will never display your address w ithout your w

ritten approval. Our fees are based on the size of the property, it's location and the extent of aerial coverage requested by you. Additional services such as increased length of video production, additional flying time, titling and editing will increase the project cost. Unless there is an error or omission on our part, the edit w ill be considered fina l and not subject to your prior approval or consent. Subject Property Address:_____________________________________ Signed and Accepted by:______________________________________ Date: _______________
### §7442. Jurisdiction

The Tax Court and its divisions shall have such jurisdiction as is conferred on them by this title, by chapters 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, by title II and title III of the Revenue Act of 1926 (44 Stat. 10–87), or by laws enacted subsequent to February 26, 1926.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 879.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Chapters 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, referred to in text, were comprised of sections 1 to 482, 500 to 706, 800 to 939, and 1000 to 1031 of former Title 26, Internal Revenue Code. Chapters 1 and 2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 were repealed by section 7851(a)(1)(A) of this title, and chapters 3 and 4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 were repealed by section 7851(a)(2)(A) of this title. For table of comparisons of the 1939 Code to the 1986 Code, see Table I preceding section 1 of this title. See also section 7851(e) of this title for provision that references in the 1986 Code to a provision of the 1939 Code, not then applicable, shall be deemed a reference to the corresponding provision of the 1986 Code, which is then applicable.

The Revenue Act of 1926, referred to in text, is act Feb. 26, 1926, ch. 27, 44 Stat. 9. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000015403-NOV-201111:39 AM
#### Gary LAKE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles GREINER, Superintendent Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-2611-PR.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 28, 2006.

Robert A. Culp, New York, NY, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Leonard Joblove, Victor Barall, Diane R. Eisner, Assistant District Attorneys (Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney Kings County, on the brief), Brooklyn, NY, for Respondent-Appellee.

Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER, B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judges, and DENNY CHIN, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Denny Chin, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Petitioner Gary Lake appeals from the June 16, 2003 judgment of the district court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, proceedings below, and specification of issues on appeal.

Lake challenges his exclusion from the interview of Beverly Ford as a violation of his “due process right ‘to be present in his own person whenever his presence has a relation, reasonably substantial, to the fulness of his opportunity to defend against the charge.’ ” *Kentucky v. Stincer,*482 U.S. 730, 745, 107 S.Ct. 2658, 96 L.Ed.2d 631 (1987) (quoting *Snyder v. Massachusetts,*291 U.S. 97, 105-06, 54 S.Ct. 330, 78 L.Ed. 674 (1934)). Assuming, without deciding, that Lake had a right to be present at this interview, he waived that right by fading to object at the time the violation occurred. *See United States v. Gagnon,*470 U.S. 522, 528-29, 105 S.Ct. 1482, 84 L.Ed.2d 486 (1985); *United States v. Peterson,*385 F.3d 127, 138-39 (2d Cir.2004).

We decline to reconsider, as Lake has requested, the decisions of the motion panels, denying Lake’s motion to expand the certificate of appealability and to stay his petition so he may exhaust an additional claim in state court.

Based on the foregoing, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21822]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AZ-910-0777-XP-241A]

State of Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Arizona Resource 
Advisory Council (RAC).
    The business meeting will be held on October 27, 2004, at the 
Crowne Plaza located at 2532 W. Peoria Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona. It 
will begin at 9 a.m. and conclude at 4 p.m. The agenda items to be 
covered include: Review of the August 18, 2004, meeting minutes; BLM 
State Director's update on statewide issues; new RAC member 
orientation; presentations on Mineral Split-Estate, Service First, and 
Draft Report to Congress on Section 321 of the Defense Authorization 
Act; and Arizona land use planning updates; RAC questions on written 
reports from BLM Field Managers; Field Office Rangeland Resource Team 
Proposals; reports by the Standards and Guidelines, Recreation, Off-
Highway Vehicle Use, Public Relations, Land Use Planning and Tenure, 
and Wild Horse and Burro Working Groups; reports from RAC members; and 
discussion of future meetings. A public comment period will be provided 
at 11:30 a.m. on October 27, 2004, for any interested publics who wish 
to address the Council.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Stevens, Bureau of Land 
Management, Arizona State Office, 222 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, 
Arizona 85004-2203, (602) 417-9215.

Joanie Losacco,
Acting Arizona State Director.
[FR Doc. 04-21822 Filed 9-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
              This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
              from the consolidated financial statements of Skynet
              Telematics.com, Inc. as of March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
              entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                            0000894557
<NAME>        Skynet Telematics.com, Inc.


<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                        680,978
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 163,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  (22,762)
<INVENTORY>                                                   503,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            2,043,412
<PP&E>                                                        647,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (125,120)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              7,474,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     (1,390,045)
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                      (26,945)
<OTHER-SE>                                                 (5,699,741)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               (7,745,521)
<SALES>                                                      (280,562)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             (280,562)
<CGS>                                                        (192,803)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              (1,280,193)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            (11,951)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (1,484,947)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (1,484,497)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (1,484,947)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0




</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFrequency analysis via the method of moment functionalsSeveral variants are presented of a linear-in-parameters least squares formulation for determining the transfer function of a stable linear system at specified frequencies given a finite set of Fourier series coefficients calculated from transient nonstationary input-output data. The basis of the technique is Shinbrot's classical method of moment functionals using complex Fourier based modulating functions to convert a differential equation model on a finite time interval into an algebraic equation which depends linearly on frequency-related parameters.Document ID19900019051Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsPearson, A. E.*(Brown Univ. Providence, RI, United States)*Pan, J. Q.*(Brown Univ. Providence, RI, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186988NAS 1.26:186988Accession Number90N28367Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF ECS-87-13771CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-1065Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900019051.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024