alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO. 20-60981-CIV-CANNON/Hunt

CAFÉ, GELATO & PANINI LLC,

on behalf of itself and 

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

/

THE TOWN CENTER AT BOCA RATON TRUST,

Counterclaimant,

v.

CAFÉ, GELATO & PANINI LLC,

Counter defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER CLOSING CASE AND DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with 

Prejudice [ECF No. 300], filed on June 9, 2023. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Stipulation 

of Dismissal, signed by all parties who have appeared, is self-executing and dismisses the case 

“effective immediately upon filing.” See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 

1277 (11th Cir. 2012). As such, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, effective

June 9, 2023, the date on which the parties filed their Stipulation of Dismissal [ECF No. 300]. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case. Any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, any 

pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and all deadlines are TERMINATED.

Case 0:20-cv-60981-AMC Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2023 Page 1 of 2
 CASE NO. 20-60981-CIV-CANNON/Hunt

2

2. The Court will retain jurisdiction over this case until August 14, 2023, and no later.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 14th day of June 2023.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-60981-AMC Document 301 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 7.32 Supplemental definitions. For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions will be used: ( a ) *Site of religious or cultural importance* means, for purposes of § 7.7 of this part, a location which has traditionally been considered important by an Indian tribe because of a religious event which happened there; because it contains specific natural products which are of religious or cultural importance; because it is believed to the be dwelling place of, the embodiment of, or a place conducive to communication with spiritual beings; because it contains elements of life-cycle rituals, such as burials and associated materials; or because it has other specific and continuing significance in Indian religion or culture.
( b ) *Allotted lands* means lands granted to Indian individuals by the United States and held in trust for those individuals by the United States.
IRR 2008 Sch B-3B F.Z12.XLS

9/30/2009

SCHEDULE OF IRRIGATION VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS TO BE APPLIED IN FY 2009 ACCOUNTING

(REFLECTED IN 2010 DEFICIT/CAPITAL RATES)

A B C D EF 

Voluntary Voluntary Payments

Date Payments Deficit to Capital 

Facility/Contractor Received Applied to in FY 2009 Sch A-6B to Sch A-2B To

ref (D+

Sacramento River - Willows

Alexander, T & K 01/12/2009 2007 11.30 $ 11.30 $ - $ 

$ 

Barber, J/et al 06/16/2009 1992 thru 1996 43,503.49 $ 43,503.49 $ - $ 43,

$ 

Maxwell ID 10/17/2008 1988 thru 2005 493,309.26 $ 493,309.26 $ - $ 493,

$ 

Riverby Limited (Mesquite Investors) 07/272009 2007 36.98 $ 36.98 $ - $ 

$ 

Total Sacramento River - Willows 536,861.03 $ 536,861.03 $ - $ 536,

$ 

Tehama Colusa Canal

4-M WD N/A 1/ 2008 2,762.92 $ 2,762.92 $ - $ 2,

$ 

Colusa County WD N/A 2/ 2008 142,358.24 $ 142,358.24 $ - $ 142,

$ 

Cortina WD N/A 1/ 2008 131.92 $ 131.92 $ - $ 

$ 

Total Tehama Colusa Canal 145,253.08 $ 145,253.08 $ - $ 145,

$ 

Total 682,114.11 $ 682,114.11 $ - $ 682,

$ 

Footnotes:

1/ Contractor requested to apply FY 2008 overpayment to FY 2008 Irrigation deficit. 2/ Contractor requested to apply FY 2007 overpayment to FY 2008 Irrigation deficit.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

#### Rate the Lesson Plan

## Field Trips

# Life on The Frontier

Fort Scott National Historic Site

                      Grade Level:
Upper Elementary: Third Grade through Fifth Grade

                      - Subject:
                      - Social Studies
                      - State Standards:
                      - NATIONAL/STATE STANDARDS:Kansas Social Studies Standards 2 and 5, Missouri Social Studies Standard 6,

- This program is designed for grades K-4. 
- The purpose of this program is to acquaint students with life at Fort Scott in the 1840s.
- Interpreters stationed at different locations will give presentations focusing on various aspects of life at Fort Scott during that era.
- The program consists of an introduction to the site's history, and living history stations.
- All stations are wheelchair accessible.
- Upon arrival, students are given a brief introduction to the history of the site. They are then split up into groups of 25 students maximum or one classes per group. Groups rotate between stations.
- Each station lasts about fifteen minutes, with the total program length being approximately two hours and fifteen minutes, depending on the number of stations. The multi-school presentation begins at 9:45 a.m. and ends at 12:00 p.m.
- At each station, students will engage in interactive activities relating to different aspects of life at Fort Scott during the 1840s.
- Confirmation and teacher's guides will be sent before the presentation. Guides will include pre- and post-visit activities.

## Lesson Plans

Last updated: February 4, 2024

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
#### Robert J. Zeller, Appellant, v. Zimmerman Contractors, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Edward Zimmerman et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
#### Mosley *v.*Fears *et al.*

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where a question of testamentary capacity was involved, it was not error to allow a witness to testify as follows: “I knew [the testator!; I was present the night he made his will; I formed an opinion as to the condition of his mind; I based that opinion on what he. did and what he said; in my' opinion he was of sound mind. I considered' Kim of sound mind from what he said and the way he acted,” — the objection being that the witness was not shown to be an expert and that *72lio did not sufficiently state the facts on which he based his opinion by testifying to what the testator said and how lie acted. *Frizzell*v. Reed, 77 *Ga.*725; *Herndon*v. *State,*111 *Ga.*178 (36 S. E. 634); *Proctor*v. *Pointer,*127 *Ga.*134 (56 S. E. 111).

August 13, 1910.

Probate of will. Before Judge Reagan. Henry superior court. January '2, 1909.

*Lowndes*Calhoun, for plaintiff in error. *E.. M. Smith,*contra.

2. Where a will was propounded for probate in solemn form, and a caveat was interposed under which it was sought to show that the testator did not have testamentary capacity, and that the will was procured by undue influence oil the part of his second wife, resulting in cutting off, without any bequest, his children by a former marriage, it'was competent to show that the testator recited in his will that he had' settled with all his children by his former marriage and held their receipts, except that of a daughter, as to whom he made a certain provision, and to introduce the receipts given to the testator by such children.

*(a)*A ground of objection to tlie admission in evidence of one of the receipts, not made or passed upon in the trial court, can not be raised here for the first time.

3. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1558-DR]


West Virginia; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-1558-DR), dated September 20, 
2004, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 30, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia is hereby amended to include the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of September 20, 2004:

Clay, Logan, and Putnam Counties for Public Assistance.
Mingo County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-22677 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Case 1:20-cv-22323-JAL Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/04/2020 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF



THE UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Alfred R. Camner, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Humberto L. Lopez, Chief Financial Officer, of BankUnited Financial Corporation, a Florida corporation (the
Company), each hereby certifies that:



|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) |  | The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|    | 
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                          





|                        |  |  |  |                         |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  |  |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|/s/ ALFRED R. CAMNER    |  |  |  | /s/ HUMBERTO L. LOPEZ   |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|Alfred R. Camner        |  |  |  | Humberto L. Lopez       |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|Dated: February 9, 2006 |  |  |  | Dated: February 9, 2006 |  |
§ 4.1014 What are the powers of the ALJ? The ALJ has all powers necessary to conduct the hearing process in a fair, orderly, expeditious, and impartial manner, including the powers to: ( a ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( b ) Issue subpoenas to the extent authorized by law;
( c ) Rule on motions;
( d ) Authorize discovery under exceptional circumstances as provided in this subpart;
( e ) Hold hearings and conferences;
( f ) Regulate the course of hearings;
( g ) Call and question witnesses;
( h ) Exclude any person from a hearing or conference for misconduct or other good cause;
( i ) Impose non-monetary sanctions for a person's failure to comply with an ALJ order or provision of this subpart;
( j ) Issue a recommended decision; and
( k ) Take any other action authorized by law.
### §6805. Redemption of stamps

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary, subject to regulations prescribed by him, may, upon receipt of satisfactory evidence of the facts, make allowance for or redeem such of the stamps, issued under authority of any internal revenue law, as may have been spoiled, destroyed, or rendered useless or unfit for the purpose intended, or for which the owner may have no use.

#### (b) Method and conditions of allowance

Such allowance or redemption may be made, either by giving other stamps in lieu of the stamps so allowed for or redeemed, or by refunding the amount or value to the owner thereof, deducting therefrom, in case of repayment, the percentage, if any, allowed to the purchaser thereof; but no allowance or redemption shall be made in any case until the stamps so spoiled or rendered useless shall have been returned to the Secretary, or until satisfactory proof has been made showing the reason why the same cannot be returned; or, if so required by the Secretary, when the person presenting the same cannot satisfactorily trace the history of said stamps from their issuance to the presentation of his claim as aforesaid.

#### (c) Time for filing claims

No claim for the redemption of, or allowance for, stamps shall be allowed under this section unless presented within 3 years after the purchase of such stamps from the Government.

#### (d) Finality of decisions

The findings of fact in and the decision of the Secretary upon the merits of any claim presented under or authorized by this section shall, in the absence of fraud or mistake in mathematical calculation, be final and not subject to revision by any accounting officer.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 830; Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §165(b), (c), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–859, §165(b), struck out provisions which authorized the Secretary to make allowances for or redeem stamps which through mistake may have been improperly or unnecessarily used, or where the rates or duties represented thereby have been excessive in amount, paid in error, or in any manner wrongfully collected.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 85–859, §165(c), inserted "under this section" after "shall be allowed".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1958 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 85–859 effective on first day of first calendar quarter which begins more than 60 days after Sept. 2, 1958, see section 1(c) of Pub. L. 85–859, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1275.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4893 

AN ACT 

To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to require 

certain disclosures by registrants regarding exemptions 

under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as 

amended. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4893 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lobbying Disclosure 

3 Improvement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REGISTRANT DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN 

5 AGENT REGISTRATION EXEMPTION. 

6 Section 4(b) of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 

7 (2 U.S.C. 1603(b)) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

9 inserting a semicolon; 

10 (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at 

11 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(8) a statement as to whether the registrant is 

14 exempt under section 3(h) of the Foreign Agents 

15 Registration Act of 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 

16 613(h)).’’. 

Passed the Senate December 14, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4893 

AN ACT 

To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to 

istration Act of 1938, as amended. ing exemptions under the Foreign Agents Regrequire certain disclosures by registrants regard-
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-12-00511-CV

CINTAS CORPORATION

v.

DAVID ARRELLANO, INDIVIDUALLY, D/B/A LAS COMADRES RESTAURANT

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No 2 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2010-CCL-01297

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in 

favor of Cintas for its liquidated damages and attorney's fees. Costs of the appeal are 

adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 20, 2014.
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 18-1129

UNITED STATES,
Appellee,

v.

ISHMAEL DOUGLAS
Defendant, Appellant.

**ERRATA SHEET**
The opinion of this Court, issued on October 12, 2018, is amended as follows:
On page 16, footnote 14, line 4: replace " ... " with " . . . ".
On page 23, footnote 16, line 3: replace "code" with "Code".
On page 28, line 24: replace "inquires" with "inquiries" and "that" with "than".
EXHIBIT 12


                 KERR-McGEE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



(Millions of dollars)               2003      2002     2001       2000      1999
---------------------               ----     -----     ----      ------     ----

Income (loss) from
  continuing operations             $254     $(611)    $476      $  817     $138

Add -
  Provision (benefit) for
    income taxes                     189       (46)     276         437      105
  Interest expense                   251       275      195         208      191
  Rental expense representative
    of interest factor                22        20       13          11       12
                                    ----     -----     ----      ------     ----

  Earnings (loss)                   $716     $(362)    $960      $1,473     $446
                                    ====     =====     ====      ======     ====

Fixed Charges -
  Interest expense                  $251     $ 275     $195      $  208     $191
  Rental expense representative
    of interest factor                22        20       13          11       12
  Interest capitalized                10         8       31           5        8
                                    ----     -----     ----      ------     ----

  Total fixed charges               $283     $ 303     $239      $  224     $211
                                    ====     =====     ====      ======     ====

Ratio of earnings (loss) to
  fixed charges                      2.5         -(1)   4.0         6.6      2.1
                                    ====     =====     ====      ======     ====



(1) Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $665 million in 2002.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     QUANTITATIVE METHODS CORPORATION March 31, 1997 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894561
<NAME>                        QUANTITATIVE METHODS CORPORATION

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997

<CASH>                                              75,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    75,000
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      75,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,150
<OTHER-SE>                                          73,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        75,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### Morris Goldblatt, Appellant, v. Joseph Rosenwasser, Respondent.

The difference between the amounts of the mortgages stated in the memorandum and the actual unpaid balances due *681thereon constituted a material variation. However, that did not make the contract incomplete. Equity may mould its relief to the exigencies of the case and may compel defendant to complete the agreement contained in the memorandum by requiring that he take a purchase-money third mortgage in the sum of $3,155, the sum of $1,105 payable according to the terms contained in the first mortgage, and the sum of $2,050 payable according to the terms of the second mortgage; or, if defendant consents, the second mortgage, over which he seems to have control, may be increased to $7,605. The memorandum is otherwise sufficient. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Adel and Wenzel, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment.