alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 423.3 When does this part apply? ( a ) This part and all applicable Federal, State, and local laws apply to all persons on Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies, with the following exceptions: ( 1 ) Certain exceptions apply to Federal, State, local, and contract employees, as further addressed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) Certain exceptions apply to non-Federal entities, as further addressed in paragraph (c) of this section;
( 3 ) Certain exceptions apply on Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies administered by other Federal agencies, as further addressed in paragraph (d) of this section; and
( 4 ) Certain exceptions apply on Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies subject to treaties and Federal laws concerning tribes and Indians, as further addressed in paragraph (e) of this section.
( b ) This part does not apply to: ( 1 ) Federal, State, and local law enforcement, fire, and rescue personnel in the performance of their official duties on Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies;
( 2 ) An employee or agent of the Federal, State, or local government, or other political subdivision, when the employee or agent is carrying out official duties; or
( 3 ) An employee or agent of an entity that has entered into a contract or agreement with Reclamation to administer, operate, maintain, patrol, or provide security for Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies, when the employee or agent is working within the scope of the defined activities described in the contract or agreement.
( c ) If a non-Federal entity has assumed responsibility for operating, maintaining, or managing Reclamation facilities, lands, or waterbodies through a contract or other written agreement, public conduct in and on those Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies will be regulated by this part 423 as well as any regulations established by the entity, the terms of the entity's contract with Reclamation, and applicable Federal, State, and local law.
( d ) Public conduct on Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies administered by other Federal agencies under statute or other authority will be governed by the regulations of those agencies rather than this part 423. However, Reclamation retains the authority to take necessary actions to safeguard the security and safety of the public and such Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies.
( e ) This part applies on all Reclamation facilities, lands, and waterbodies that are subject to Treaties with, and Federal laws concerning the rights of, federally recognized tribes, and individual Indians who are members thereof, to the extent that this part is consistent with those Treaties and Federal laws.
( f ) This part 423 and other Federal laws will govern over any conflicting regulations of a non-Federal entity.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Contact Us
  Return to Previous Page
 Thing to Do
Discover Bristol Bay Fishing History
Lake Clark National Park & Preserve A large wooden boat sits with the number 23 painted on it. Activity Fee
No
 
 
 
 Time of Day
Day
 Lake Clark National Park & Preserve Tags lake clark national park & preserve
lacl
alaska
port alsworth
fishing
salmon
boat
history
 A wooden boat with the number 23 painted in black on it.An intact icon of Bristol Bay's historic salmon fishing industry NPS / T. Tessier Libby's Number 23 Bristol Bay Double-Ender There are only 10 museum quality double-enders in existence and one is stationed outside the Port Alsworth Visitor Center. Discover more about this fully restored wooden vessel that served the fishing industry from 1914 until 1951. Learn the remarkable history of Bristol Bay, the world's last great wild salmon fishery that still continues to feed the world.
 Tags lake clark national park & preserve
lacl
alaska
port alsworth
fishing
salmon
boat
history
 Last updated: September 12, 2019


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
- CtrSpec-Exh1SutterAttach2: Contractor SpecificSutter Exhibit 1, Attach. 2, 4-10-03
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, Adult and Adolescent Interventions.                    

*Date:*                         October 29, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Four Points by Sheraton Bethesda, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Aileen Schulte, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6140, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, (301) 443-1225,                         *aschulte@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health research Grants; 93281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 4, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-22659 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel MENDEZ-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40861.

Confei'ence Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern Dis*193trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Thomas S. Berg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Joel Mendez-Gonzalez (Mendez) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation. On appeal, Mendez argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Mendez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Mendez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Mendez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

The judgment of the district court is thus AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Euroopa Liidu C 270I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 270I |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 63. aastakäik17. august 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 270I

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

63. aastakäik17. august 2020

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2020/C 270 I/01 | Komisjoni avaldus seoses Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiviga (EL) 2019/1937 liidu õiguse rikkumisest teavitavate isikute kaitse kohta | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2020/C 270 I/01

Komisjoni avaldus seoses Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiviga (EL) 2019/1937 liidu õiguse rikkumisest teavitavate isikute kaitse kohta

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 17.8.2020 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CI 270/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CI 270/1

---

Komisjoni avaldus seoses Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiviga (EL) 2019/1937 liidu õiguse rikkumisest teavitavate isikute kaitse kohta

(2020/C 270 I/01)

Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 23. oktoobri 2019. aasta direktiivi (EL) 2019/1937 (liidu õiguse rikkumisest teavitavate isikute kaitse kohta) (1) artikli 27 kohaselt toimuva läbivaatamise ajal kaalub komisjon võimalust esitada ettepanek laiendada direktiivi kohaldamisala teatavatele Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artiklitel 153 ja 157 põhinevatele aktidele, olles vajaduse korral konsulteerinud tööturu osapooltega vastavalt Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingu artiklile 154.

---

(1)  ELT L 305, 26.11.2019, lk 17.

---
### §611. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 19, 1947, ch. 80, §1, 61 Stat. 102, which directed the Secretary of the Interior to divide the trust funds on deposit in the Treasury of the United States to the joint credit of the Shoshone and Arapaho Tribes of the Wind River Reservation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wind River Indian Reservation; Compensation for Lands of the Riverton Reclamation Project

Act Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 509, §2, 67 Stat. 612, which provided that, subject only to the existing rights and interests which were not extinguished and terminated by act Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 509, 67 Stat. 592, all unentered and vacant lands of the Riverton reclamation project within the ceded portion of the Wind River Indian Reservation were restored to the public domain for administration, use, occupancy, and disposal under the reclamation and public land laws of the United States, was editorially reclassified and is set out as a note under section 597 of Title 43, Public Lands.
#### P. Grassi Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Sol Atlas, Defendant, and Welwyn Road Realty, Inc., Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Gerald L. BRABHAM v. Alfred T. RUNDLE, Superintendent, Graterford Correctional Institution.

Misc. No. 3828.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 29, 1968.

*106MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for disposition of relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

According to the allegations in his petition, relator was tried and convicted on several Bills of Indictment by a judge without a jury in the Court of Oyer and Terminer, Philadelphia County. He was sentenced to consecutive terms of two to six years on each bill and is presently serving his sentence at the State Correctional Institution at Graterford.

Although relator did not directly appeal his conviction and sentence, on January 18, 1968, he filed a Post Conviction Hearing Act (19 P.S. § 1180-1 et seq.) petition alleging a denial of certain constitutional rights. Although no disposition has as yet been made by the State Court of relator’s post conviction petition, he has filed the present petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging the same grounds for relief.

It is perhaps fundamental that before a Federal Court will entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus the petitioner must exhaust all available State remedies. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Although the doctrine of exhaustion of State remedies is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to Federal habeas corpus, where a State has a post-conviction statute providing for consideration of petitions alleging denial of Federal constitutional rights, the State Courts should be afforded an opportunity to act with respect to the alleged denial. Case v. State of Nebraska, 381 U.S. 336, 85 S.Ct. 1486, 14 L.Ed.2d 422 (1965); United States ex rel. Singer v. Myers, 384 F.2d 279 (3rd Cir. 1967).

In that Pennsylvania has enacted a post-conviction statute which affords an available remedy to correct an abuse of Federal due process in the administration of its criminal laws, we feel compelled to abstain from acting on relator’s habeas corpus petition pending an exhaustion of his post-conviction remedy. Although relator has applied for post conviction relief, in that no disposition has as yet been made of his petition, he has not exhausted his State remedies. Moreover, the failure of the State courts to pass upon relator’s post-conviction petition as of this time does not constitute “inordinate delay” within the meaning of Smith v. State of Kansas, 356 F.2d 654 (10th Cir. 1966).

In my opinion, there is no probable cause for an appeal. Fitzsimmons v. Yeager, 391 F.2d 849 (3rd Cir. 1968).

ORDER

And now, this 29th day of March, 1968, relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07900

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07900\07900_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07900\07900_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07900\07900_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07900\07900_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07900\07900_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07900\07900_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07900\07900_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07900\07900_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

07900\Supporting Documentation\07900_Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07900\Supporting Documentation\07900_Calc Sheet.doc EPA Technical Review Notes

x 07900\Supporting Documentation\07900_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07900\Supporting Documentation\07900_WEC Ash Process Flow Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07900\07900_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION





I, Charles J. Novak, Chief Financial Officer of Integrated Surgical Systems,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
          ended September 30, 2004, which this certification accompanies (the
          "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.




 Dated: December 16, 2004                          /s/ Charles J. Novak
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                       Charles J. Novak
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ KLAUS BESIERKlaus BesierPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)February 9, 2007
§ 4110.1 Mandatory qualifications. ( a ) Except as provided under §§ 4110.1-1, 4130.5, and 4130.6-3, to qualify for grazing use on the public lands an applicant must own or control land or water base property, and must be: ( 1 ) A citizen of the United States or have properly filed a valid declaration of intention to become a citizen or a valid petition for naturalization; or
( 2 ) A group or association authorized to conduct business in the State in which the grazing use is sought, all members of which are qualified under paragraph (a) of this section; or
( 3 ) A corporation authorized to conduct business in the State in which the grazing use is sought.
( b ) Applicants for the renewal or issuance of new permits and leases and any affiliates must be determined by the authorized officer to have a satisfactory record of performance under § 4130.1-1(b).
( c ) Applicants shall submit an application and any other relevant information requested by the authorized officer in order to determine that all qualifications have been met.
[43 FR 29067, July 5, 1978, as amended at 49 FR 6450, Feb. 21, 1984; 60 FR 9962, Feb. 22, 1995; 71 FR 39503, July 12, 2006]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas Gilmore, Appellant.

Appeal dismissed upon stipulation filed.
#### § 4170.2-2 Penal provisions under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act.

Under section 303(a) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*), any person who knowingly and willfully commits an act prohibited under § 4140.1(b) or who knowingly and willfully violates approved special rules and regulations may be brought before a designated U.S. magistrate and is punishable by a fine in accordance with the applicable provisions of Title 18 of the United States Code, or imprisonment for no more than 12 months, or both.

[60 FR 9969, Feb. 22, 1995]
39–008

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 1st Session 109–140

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.J. RES. 10, PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AUTHORIZING 

THE CONGRESS TO PROHIBIT THE PHYSICAL DESECRATION OF THE 

FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 330] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 330, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of House Joint Resolution 10, proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States, under a structured rule. The 

rule provides two hours of debate in the House equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on the Judiciary. The rule waives all points of order 

against consideration of the joint resolution. 

The rule makes in order the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in this report, if offered by Representative Watt or 

his designee, which shall be separately debatable for one hour 

equally divided between the proponent and an opponent. The rule 

waives all points of order against the amendment printed in this 

report. The rule provides that, notwithstanding the operation of the 

previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of 

the joint resolution to a time designated by the Speaker. Finally, 

the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The Committee on Rules is not aware of any points of order 

against consideration of the bill. The waivers of all points of order 

are prophylactic in nature. 

2

SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE MADE IN

ORDER

(Summary derived from information provided by the amendment 

sponsor.) 

Watt: Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute. Requires that 

any statute enacted by the Congress pursuant to the proposed Constitutional Amendment must be consistent with the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 

TEXT OF THE AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A 

SUBSTITUTE 

Strike all after the resolving clause and insert the following:

That the following article is proposed as an amendment to 

the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid 

to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution 

when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the 

several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification: 

‘‘ARTICLE—

‘‘Not inconsistent with the first article of amendment to 

this Constitution, the Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United 

States.’’.

Æ