alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 1:20-cv-22319-KMM Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:20-cv-22319-KMM Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 3835.17 What additional requirements must I fulfill to obtain a small miner waiver for my mining claims or sites on National Park System lands? ( a ) Before performing assessment work on National Park System lands, you must submit and obtain the National Park Service (NPS)'s approval of a complete plan of operations in compliance with regulations at 36 CFR parts 6 and 9. Your proposed activities must further the ultimate commercial mineral development of each claim, such as delineation of the mineral deposit or commencement of production. Once you submit a proposed plan, NPS will evaluate the plan, conduct a validity exam if necessary, and either approve or disapprove the plan.
( b ) ( 1 ) If NPS approves your plan of operations, by the September 1 on which you want to submit a small miner waiver request you must: ( i ) Post a reclamation bond with NPS;
( ii ) Begin the approved activity; and
( iii ) Submit a waiver request complying with § 3835.10 before the assessment year begins for which you wish to obtain a waiver.
( 2 ) By December 30, you must file your affidavit of assessment work for the mining claims and a notice of intent to hold for your mill or tunnel sites.
( c ) If NPS does not approve your proposed plan of operations by July 1, to allow you sufficient time to conduct assessment work before September 1, you may— ( 1 ) Pay BLM the maintenance fees by September 1;
( 2 ) Petition BLM before September 1 for a deferment of assessment work; or
( 3 ) Submit a request for a lack of access waiver.
#### § 102.31 Fees.

SBA offices shall charge fees for duplication of records under the Privacy Act in the same way in which they charge duplication fees under § 102.6(b)(3). No search or review fee may be charged for any record unless the record has been exempted from access under Exemptions (j)(2) or (k)(2) of the Privacy Act. SBA will waive fees under $25.00.
#### § 3506.20 After my license is issued, may I modify my license or exploration plan?

BLM may approve modifications of your exploration plan upon your request. We may also permit you to remove lands from your exploration license at any time. However, once we issue your exploration license, you may not add lands to the area of your exploration license.
#### Charles H. Sutherland, Respondent, v. Sarah E. Sutherland, Appellant, Impleaded with Sarah E. Murray.

Order affirmed, without costs. All concurred.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 460 

To extend the authority for Federal contractors to reimburse employees unable 

to perform work due to the COVID–19 pandemic from March 31, 2021, 

to September 30, 2021. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2021 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend the authority for Federal contractors to reimburse 

employees unable to perform work due to the COVID– 

19 pandemic from March 31, 2021, to September 30, 

2021. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF REIMBURSEMENT AUTHORITY 

4 FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS. 

5 Section 3610 of the CARES Act (Public Law 116– 

6 136; 134 Stat. 414) is amended by striking ‘‘September 

7 30, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2021’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Neoware Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith
D. Schneck, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




/s/ KEITH D. SCHNECK
----------------------------------------------------
Keith D. Schneck
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
November 8, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 419.1 What is the purpose of this part? ( a ) This part satisfies the requirement of Section 205(a)(5) of the Truckee-Carson-Pyramid Lake Water Rights Settlement Act (Settlement Act) that the negotiated agreement for operation of Truckee River Reservoirs be promulgated as a Federal regulation. The Truckee River Operating Agreement (TROA), published in September 2008 by the Bureau of Reclamation, is the agreement negotiated pursuant to Section 205(a) of the Settlement Act and is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 522 (a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* Also, a copy of TROA may be obtained from or inspected at the Bureau of Reclamation, 705 N. Plaza St., Carson City, NV 89701, 775-884-8356, where copies are on file, or at the following Web site: *http://www.usbr.gov/mp/troa/ .*
( b ) This part implements the Settlement Act by providing for operation of the Truckee River Reservoirs and other reservoirs in a manner that: ( 1 ) Implements California's allocation of Truckee River basin water and the Nevada and California allocations of Lake Tahoe basin water;
( 2 ) Enhances fish, wildlife, and recreational beneficial uses of water in the Truckee River basin;
( 3 ) Carries out the terms, conditions, and contingencies of the Preliminary Settlement Agreement;
( 4 ) Ensures that water is stored in, released from, and passed through Truckee River Reservoirs to satisfy the exercise of water rights in conformance with the Orr Ditch Decree and Truckee River General Electric Decree, except for rights voluntarily relinquished by any persons or transferred under State law;
( 5 ) Provides for the enhancement of spawning flows available in the Lower Truckee River for Pyramid Lake Fishes in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act, as amended;
( 6 ) Satisfies all applicable dam safety and flood control requirements; and
( 7 ) Minimizes the Secretary of the Interior's costs associated with operation and maintenance of Stampede Reservoir.
### §6062. Signing of corporation returns

The return of a corporation with respect to income shall be signed by the president, vice-president, treasurer, assistant treasurer, chief accounting officer or any other officer duly authorized so to act. In the case of a return made for a corporation by a fiduciary pursuant to the provisions of section 6012(b)(3), such fiduciary shall sign the return. The fact that an individual's name is signed on the return shall be prima facie evidence that such individual is authorized to sign the return on behalf of the corporation.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 748.)
# Uradni list C 290/23.

| | ISSN 1725-5244 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 290 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 4823. november 2005 |

ISSN 1725-5244

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 290

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 4823. november 2005

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Informacije |
| | Komisija |
| 2005/C 290/1 | Menjalni tečaji eura | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

I   Informacije

Komisija

2005/C 290/1

Menjalni tečaji eura

1

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

I Informacije

Komisija

| 23.11.2005 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 290/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2005

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 290/1

---

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

22. novembra 2005

(2005/C 290/01)

1 euro=

| | Valuta | Menjalni tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | ameriški dolar | 1,1701 |
| JPY | japonski jen | 139,72 |
| DKK | danska krona | 7,4605 |
| GBP | funt šterling | 0,68465 |
| SEK | švedska krona | 9,5426 |
| CHF | švicarski frank | 1,5471 |
| ISK | islandska krona | 73,82 |
| NOK | norveška krona | 7,8505 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9555 |
| CYP | ciprski funt | 0,5736 |
| CZK | češka krona | 29,270 |
| EEK | estonska krona | 15,6466 |
| HUF | madžarski forint | 254,18 |
| LTL | litovski litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | latvijski lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | malteška lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 3,9772 |
| RON | romunski leu | 3,6642 |
| SIT | slovenski tolar | 239,52 |
| SKK | slovaška krona | 38,700 |
| TRY | turška lira | 1,6030 |
| AUD | avstralski dolar | 1,5965 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,3850 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 9,0726 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,7052 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 1,9907 |
| KRW | južnokorejski won | 1 221,99 |
| ZAR | južnoafriški rand | 7,7656 |
| CNY | kitajski juan | 9,4590 |
| HRK | hrvaška kuna | 7,4030 |
| IDR | indonezijska rupija | 11 771,21 |
| MYR | malezijski ringit | 4,423 |
| PHP | filipinski peso | 63,630 |
| RUB | ruski rubelj | 33,7510 |
| THB | tajski bat | 48,241 |

Valuta

Menjalni tečaj

USD

ameriški dolar

1,1701

JPY

japonski jen

139,72

DKK

danska krona

7,4605

GBP

funt šterling

0,68465

SEK

švedska krona

9,5426

CHF

švicarski frank

1,5471

ISK

islandska krona

73,82

NOK

norveška krona

7,8505

BGN

lev

1,9555

CYP

ciprski funt

0,5736

CZK

češka krona

29,270

EEK

estonska krona

15,6466

HUF

madžarski forint

254,18

LTL

litovski litas

3,4528

LVL

latvijski lats

0,6960

MTL

malteška lira

0,4293

PLN

poljski zlot

3,9772

RON

romunski leu

3,6642

SIT

slovenski tolar

239,52

SKK

slovaška krona

38,700

TRY

turška lira

1,6030

AUD

avstralski dolar

1,5965

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,3850

HKD

hongkonški dolar

9,0726

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,7052

SGD

singapurski dolar

1,9907

KRW

južnokorejski won

1 221,99

ZAR

južnoafriški rand

7,7656

CNY

kitajski juan

9,4590

HRK

hrvaška kuna

7,4030

IDR

indonezijska rupija

11 771,21

MYR

malezijski ringit

4,423

PHP

filipinski peso

63,630

RUB

ruski rubelj

33,7510

THB

tajski bat

48,241

---

(1)

Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

---
#### Hazel Saunders, Respondent, v. Champlain Bus Corporation, Appellant. William Saunders, Respondent, v. Champlain Bus Corporation, Appellant. Raymond Roner, Respondent, v. Champlain Bus Corporation, Appellant.

All concur.
§ 106.502 Who has authority to perform a Gift conflict of interest determination? ( a ) For Gifts solicited and/or accepted under sections 4(g), 8(b)(1)(G), and 7(k)(2) of the Small Business Act, the General Counsel, or designee, must make the final conflict of interest determination. No Gift shall be solicited and/or accepted under these sections of the Small Business Act if such solicitation and/or acceptance would, in the determination of the General Counsel (or designee), create a conflict of interest.
( b ) For Gifts of services and facilities solicited and/or accepted under section 5(b)(9), the conflict of interest determination may be made by designated disaster legal counsel.
07/03/2012 10:03 FAX 2024935142 FAA -+ OMS 141 001/002 

,.. ••n, .., .. 

1

.,, '['' ,~ ('jr• ! :::~:··'(\~'-') :'/ic.i\~ f . )[·· 

! .''' '('l'l''.r·1prnr 1 . 

':,':)'rh)~~~f!·:~~),,lUlr· ~~~S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JUN 2'9 2012 

n\: .. ' u _r\, d ~,., 1 'lc_l OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

RECEIVED 

WASHINGTON, D.C. HEARING DOCKET 

June 28, 2012 znrz .. "), 

-· II: 0 I 

In the Matter of 

MESA AIRLINES, INC. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) _____________________ ) 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09SW0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

OMS NO. FM-2009-0279 

Judge: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW REQUEST FOR A HEARING 

AND DISMISS THE PROCEEDING 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.215, respondent Mesa Airlines, Inc. ("Mesa") hereby 

moves to withdraw the request for a hearing and dismiss this proceeding. As part of the 

· claims resolution process in the Cl'lapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization of Mesa and its 

Parent, Mesa Air Group, Inc., the Parties have reached a settlement of this matter, 

resulting in the resolution of the underlying claim in issue in the Complaint. 

Accordingly, Mesa moves to withdraw the request for a hearing and to dismiss 

the proceeding. 

\ \llC · 02~Y66/00UUQ2 • ~1~~1i~ 1 vI 

C is ph r J. Pappaioanou 

V.P. tegal Affairs 

Mesa Air Group, Inc. · 

410 North 44th Street, Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

TEL; 602-685-4000 

FAX: 602-685-4350 

Respondent's Counsel 

1 
07/03/2012 10:03 FAX 2024835142 FAA ~ OMS 141002/002 

SERVICE LIST 

FAA Docket No. CP09SW0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

I certify that June 28, 2012, I caused this Motion to Withdraw Request for a Hearing 

and Dismiss the Proceeding to be served on the following by the methods identified: 

. ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 

(BY U.S. Mail) 

Annjenet Chennault, FAA Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: (817) 222-5071 

FAX: (817) 222-5092/5946 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. 

ONE COPY 

East Building Ground Floor. Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

(202) 366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

(BY U.S. MAIL AND FACSIMILE) 

vk#r· -. 

\'-DC • 02~AGG/000002 · l122G81 vI 

2
#### New Paltz, Highland and Poughkeepsie Traction Company, Appellant, v. Central New England Railway Company and O’Brien Construction Company, Respondents. In the Matter of the Application of the Central New England Railway Company for the Elimination of the Following Grade Crossings in the Town of Lloyd, Ulster County: (1) The North Road to Black Lake; (2) the New Paltz Turnpike, also Known as the Whittley Crossing, and (3) for Determining the Manner in Which the Proposed New Crossing at Brooks Crossing Shall Be Constructed.

Order that the injunction granted by Justice Chester, pending the order to show cause before the Appellate Division, be continued until the action is tried and determined before Justice Chester; if the trial is delayed by the plain*929tiff, the justice may modify or vacate the injunction. The justice may at any time, for any sufficient reason appearing to him, vacate or modify the stay before the conclusion of the trial. Smith, P. J., and Woodward, J., dissented.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fayez ALBURAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-3905.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 27, 2006.

*475Thomas D. Shakeshaft, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Johanna M. Christiansen, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, Fayez Alburay, Federal Correctional Institution — AUenwood, White Deer, PA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, and Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judges.

*

 This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel pursuant to Operating Procedure 6(b). After reviewing the briefs and the record, the panel is unanimously of the *475view that oral argument is unnecessary. Accordingly, the appeal has been submitted on the briefs and the record alone. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

ORDER

Fayez Alburay is serving a fifty-one-month sentence on account of a food stamp scam to which he pleaded guilty. Alburay appealed his sentence, and, after considering several arguments, we remanded the case with two specific and narrow instructions. *See United States v. Alburay,*415 F.3d 782, 785-90 (7th Cir.2005). First, we instructed the district court to replace certain supervised release language in its judgment with a single, explicit sentence: “If deported, you are ordered not to reenter the United States without the express written permission of the Attorney General of the United States.” *Id.*at 787-88. Second, we instructed the district court to correct its initial restitution figure to the stated amount of $1,725,000. *See id.*at 789. We affirmed in all other respects.

The district court’s corrected judgment fully complied with our instructions. Nevertheless, Alburay has lodged another appeal to his sentence. In this successive appeal, however, his appointed counsel has moved to withdraw, citing a lack of a non-frivolous basis for the appeal. *See Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We invited Alburay to respond, but he elected not to do so.

Again, the district court complied with our two corrective instructions completely. Any challenge to this compliance would thus be frivolous. Further, counsel correctly states that the scope of our remand was expressly limited to these two narrow and unambiguous instructions, and any challenge to the scope of the remand would also be frivolous. Moreover, other possible arguments for this appeal were either conclusively decided by this court in the first appeal or waived as a result of not being raised in the first appeal. *See United States v. Husband,*312 F.3d 247, 250-51 (7th Cir.2002). As a result, raising such arguments beyond the scope of the remand would likewise be frivolous.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.
#### § 3830.90 Failure to comply with these regulations.
§ 3275.15 How accurately must I measure my production and utilization? It depends on whether you use a meter to calculate Federal production or royalty, and what quantity of resource you are measuring. ( a ) For meters that you use to calculate Federal royalty: ( 1 ) If the meter measures electricity, it must have an accuracy of ±0.25% or better of reading;
( 2 ) If the meter measures steam flowing at more than 100,000 lbs/hr on a monthly basis, it must have an accuracy reading of ±2 percent or better;
( 3 ) If the meter measures steam flowing at less than 100,000 lbs/hr on a monthly basis, it must have an accuracy reading of ±4 percent or better;
( 4 ) If the meter measures water flowing at more than 500,000 lbs/hr on a monthly basis, it must have an accuracy reading of ±2 percent or better;
( 5 ) If the meter measures water flowing at 500,000 lbs/hr or less on a monthly basis, it must have an accuracy reading of ±4 percent or better;
( 6 ) If the meter measures heat content, it must have an accuracy reading of ±4 percent, or better; or
( 7 ) If the meter measures two-phase flow at any rate, BLM will determine and inform you of the meter accuracy requirements. You must obtain our prior written approval before installing and using meters for two-phase flow.
( b ) Any meters that you do not use to calculate Federal royalty are considered production meters, which must maintain an accuracy of ±5 percent or better.
( c ) We may modify these requirements as necessary to protect the interests of the United States.
#### Modern Woodmen of America v. Ida A. Plummer.

Filed October 19, 1905.

No. 13,930.

Review: Dismissal. -Where the transcript filed in this court does not contain the judgment or final order of the district court sought to he reviewed, the petition in error will he dismissed.

Error to the district court for Deuel county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.

*Dismissed.*

*712
      *B. D. Smith*and *Talbot & Allen,*for plaintiff in error.

*G. G. McAllister*and *Wilcox é Halligan, contra.*

Duffie, C.

The transcript filed in this court consists of the petition, answer, reply, instructions, verdict and motion for a new trial. It does not show that the motion for a new trial was ever passed upon, or that a final judgment has been entered in the case. It is only a judgment or final order rendered by the district court that can be reviewed by the supreme court, and, unless the transcript brought to this court contains such judgment or final order, the proceedings will be dismissed. *Baker v. Kloster,*41 Neb. 890.

It is recommended that the petition in error be dismissed.

Albert and Jackson, CO., concur.

By the Court: For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, the above proceedings are

Dismissed.
#### Smith *v.*Newberry.

November 19, 1910.

Injunction. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior court. April 28, 1910.

*H. A. Mathews,*for plaintiff in error. *L. D. Moore,*contra.

Evans, J.

On an interlocutory hearing of a petition to enjoin the cutting of timber, where it appeared that the plaintiffs and defendant derived their title from a common grantor as abutting landowners, and where the chief contention was as to the location of the boundaries between the coterminous landowners, and as to the truth of which the evidence was in conflict, the judge did not abuse his discretion by restraining the defendant from cutting the timber upon the land according to the boundaries as defined by the evidence submitted by the defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 3425.1 Application for lease.