alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59955-59956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Meeting of the Yakima River Basin Conservation Advisory Group, 
Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Yakima, Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is 
hereby given that the Yakima River Basin Conservation Advisory Group,

[[Page 59956]]

Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Yakima, Washington, 
established by the Secretary of the Interior, will hold a public 
meeting. The purpose of the Conservation Advisory Group is to provide 
technical advice and counsel to the Secretary of the Interior and 
Washington State on the structure, implementation, and oversight of the 
Yakima River Basin Water Conservation Program.

DATES: Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 9 a.m.-4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Bureau of Reclamation Office, 1917 Marsh Road, Yakima, 
Washington.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James Esget, Manager, Yakima River 
Basin Water Enhancement Project, 1917 Marsh Road, Yakima, Washington, 
98901; 509-575-5848, extension 267.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting will be to review 
the option of using the acquired habitat lands to mitigate the impacts 
that occur from the planned conservation measures and develop 
recommendations. This meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: September 29, 2004,
James A. Esget,
Program Manager, Pacific Northwest Region.
[FR Doc. 04-22458 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M
#### Charles L. Reese, Jr., v. Texas Company.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Case 0:99-cv-06089-WDF Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/1999 Page 1 of 3
Case 0:99-cv-06089-WDF Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/1999 Page 2 of 3
Case 0:99-cv-06089-WDF Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/1999 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
2000 FORM 10-Q OF ARGOSY GAMING COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN THIS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          46,326
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,399
<INVENTORY>                                      1,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,954
<PP&E>                                         539,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,530
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 556,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,373
<BONDS>                                        323,859
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           283
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   556,704
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,817
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   291
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,419
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,419
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TYREE A. LAWSON,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, 

PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 47 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the “Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or 

Extraordinary Relief from Judicial Fraud” is DENIED.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________ No. ACM 39053

_______ _______ __________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Nathan M. LEONARD Senior Airman (E

- 4) , U.S. Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
Decided 10 August 2017

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: Vance H. Spath

. Approved sentence: Dishonorable discharge, confinement for 3 years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E

- 1. Sentence adjudged 15 March 2016 by GCM convened at Joint Base Elmendorf

- Richardson, Alaska

. For Appellant: Major Jaret t F . Merk , USAF. For Appellee: Gerald R. Bruce , Esquire

. Before DREW
, MAYBERRY , and DENNIS
, Appellate Military Judges

.

_______ _______ __________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

_______ _______ __________

PER CURIAM: The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Article 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).United States v. Leonard , No. ACM 39053

2 Accordingly, the approved findings and sente nce are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

KURT J. BRUBAKER Clerk of the Court
§ 45.51 What are the parties' rights during the hearing? Each party has the following rights during the hearing, as necessary to assure full and accurate disclosure of the facts: ( a ) To present testimony and exhibits, consistent with the requirements in §§ 45.21(c), 45.22(c), 45.25(c), 45.42(b), and 45.52;
( b ) To make objections, motions, and arguments; and
( c ) To cross-examine witnesses and to conduct re-direct and re-cross examination as permitted by the ALJ.
#### § 41.120 Transfers of property.

If a recipient sells or otherwise transfers property financed in whole or in part with Federal financial assistance to a transferee that operates any education program or activity, and the Federal share of the fair market value of the property is not upon such sale or transfer properly accounted for to the Federal Government, both the transferor and the transferee shall be deemed to be recipients, subject to the provisions of §§ 41.205 through 41.235(a).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT PIERCE DIVISION 

CASE NO.: 2:20-cv-14159-ROSENBERG-MAYNARD 

DJ LINCOLN ENTERPRISES, INC. 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GOOGLE, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

_____________________________________ 

DECLARATION OF BRIAN M. WILLEN IN SUPPORT OF 

GOOGLE LLC’S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY 

I, Brian M. Willen, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, counsel 

for Defendant Google LLC (“Google”), and duly admitted pro hac vice before this Court. I 

submit this Declaration in support of Google’s Motion to Stay Discovery. I am over the age of 

18 and competent to make this Declaration. I make each of the following statements based on 

my personal knowledge, and I could, if necessary, testify to the truth of each of them.

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff’s 

Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents, dated October 26, 2020, and served 

on Google that same day. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Florida and the United 

States that the foregoing is true and correct and that this Declaration is executed the 27th day of 

October, 2020, in Ann Arbor, Michigan. 

/s/ Brian M. Willen

Brian M. Willen 

Case 2:20-cv-14159-RLR Document 29-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2020 Page 1 of 1
1 COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS Unit 82 Joint Venture, Five Star Holding Company, Inc., Five Star Holding Management, L.L.C. and 1320/1390 Don Haskins, LTD , Appellant s ,

v. Mediacopy Texas, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Infodisc Global Holding, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and International Commercial Bank of China ,

Appellee s
. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' No. 08

- 08

- 00 159

- CV

Appeal from the
327 th District Court of El Paso County, Texas (TC# 2005

- 1987 )

O R D E R International Commercial Bank of China (ICB) has filed a motion to consolidate cause numbers 08

- 08

- 00159

- CV and 08

- 13

- 00088

- CV. In its motion, ICB “gives notice that Appeal No. 08

- 08

- 00159

- CV can now proceed following remand to the trial court”. ICB also asserts that we dismissed the appeal in cause number 08

- 08

- 00159

- CV, but the opinion and judgment reflect that the Court vacated the trial court’s judgment and dismissed the case below, not the appeal. Unit 82 Joint Venture v. Mediacopy Texas, Inc. , 349 S.W.3d 42 (Tex.App.

-- El Paso 2010). The Supreme Court held that it was error to vacate the trial court’s judgment and it reversed this Court’s judgment. Evans v. Unit 82 Joint Venture , 377 S.W.3d 694 (Tex. 2012). Ordinarily, the Supreme Court would rema nd the cause to this Court in order for the appeal to resume. Rather than remanding the cause to this Court, thereby returning jurisdiction of cause number 08

- 08

- 00159

- CV to the court of appeals, the Supreme Court remanded directly to the trial court for “further proceedings.”2

The Court has determined that it is necessary to address whether the Court has jurisdiction of cause number 08

- 08

- 00159

- CV before it considers the motions to consolidate filed in cause numbers 08

- 08

- 00159

- CV and 08

- 13

- 00088

- CV. The Court requests that the parties address whether this Court has jurisdiction of cause number 08

- 08

- 00159

- CV, and more specifically, whether it has jurisdiction to address the issues raised in that appeal . The response can be in the form of a letter brief and is due with this Court within 15 days from the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30 th day of Ma y , 20 13

. PER CURIAM
Before McClure , C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez , JJ.
#### Frank C. Krug and Another, Respondents, v. Diamond Tobacco Company, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, that the delay of more than a year under the circumstances was unreasonable and inexcusable, All concurred, except Robson and Merrell, JJ., who dissented.
Exhibit 32.2



November 14, 2005



VIA EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



|Re: | Segue Software, Inc. Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In connection with the annual report of Segue Software, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael F. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company hereby certify that:



1. the Companys Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This certification is provided solely pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed a part of the Report.



Sincerely,/s/    MICHAEL F.
SULLIVANMichael F. SullivanChief Financial Officer
### §6035. Basis information to persons acquiring property from decedent

#### (a) Information with respect to property acquired from decedents

#### (1) In general

The executor of any estate required to file a return under section 6018(a) shall furnish to the Secretary and to each person acquiring any interest in property included in the decedent's gross estate for Federal estate tax purposes a statement identifying the value of each interest in such property as reported on such return and such other information with respect to such interest as the Secretary may prescribe.

#### (2) Statements by beneficiaries

Each person required to file a return under section 6018(b) shall furnish to the Secretary and to each other person who holds a legal or beneficial interest in the property to which such return relates a statement identifying the information described in paragraph (1).

#### (3) Time for furnishing statement

#### (A) In general

Each statement required to be furnished under paragraph (1) or (2) shall be furnished at such time as the Secretary may prescribe, but in no case at a time later than the earlier of—

(i) the date which is 30 days after the date on which the return under section 6018 was required to be filed (including extensions, if any), or

(ii) the date which is 30 days after the date such return is filed.

#### (B) Adjustments

In any case in which there is an adjustment to the information required to be included on a statement filed under paragraph (1) or (2) after such statement has been filed, a supplemental statement under such paragraph shall be filed not later than the date which is 30 days after such adjustment is made.

#### (b) Regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as necessary to carry out this section, including regulations relating to—

(1) the application of this section to property with regard to which no estate tax return is required to be filed, and

(2) situations in which the surviving joint tenant or other recipient may have better information than the executor regarding the basis or fair market value of the property.

(Added Pub. L. 114–41, title II, §2004(b)(1), July 31, 2015, 129 Stat. 455.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6035, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 743; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §340(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 633, related to information returns of officers, directors, and shareholders of foreign personal holding companies, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 108–357, title IV, §413(c)(26), (d)(1), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1509, 1510, applicable to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after Dec. 31, 2004, and to taxable years of United States shareholders with or within which such taxable years of foreign corporations end.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to property with respect to which an estate tax return is filed after July 31, 2015, see section 2004(d) of Pub. L. 114–41, set out as an Effective Date of 2015 Amendment note under section 1014 of this title.
Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 2 of 3
3 

REDACTED FOR PUBLIC FILING 

Dated: September 4, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Joseph W. Bain 

JOSEPH W. BAIN, ESQ. 

Florida Bar No. 860360 

Email Address: jbain@shutts.com 

SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP 

1100 CityPlace Tower 

525 Okeechobee Boulevard 

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 

Telephone: (561) 835-8500 

Facsimile: (561) 650-8530 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS HMD 

AMERICA, INC. AND HMD GLOBAL OY

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are 

being served with a copy of this document on September 4, 2020. 

 /s/ Joseph W. Bain 

 Joseph W. Bain 

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Walter Z. Berger, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Emmis CommunicationsCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004 /s/ WALTER Z. BERGERWalter Z. BergerExecutive Vice President, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer
### §7613. Cross references

#### (a) Inspection of books, papers, records, or other data

**For inspection of books, papers, records, or other data in the case of—**

**(1) Wagering, see section 4423.**

**(2) Alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes, see subtitle E.**

#### (b) Search warrants

**For provisions relating to—**

**(1) Searches and seizures, see Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.**

**(2) Issuance of search warrants with respect to subtitle E, see section 5557.**

**(3) Search warrants with respect to property used in violation of the internal revenue laws, see section 7302.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 903, §7607; renumbered §7608, July 18, 1956, ch. 629, title I, §104(a), 70 Stat. 570; renumbered §7609 and amended Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §204(14), (15), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1429, 1430; Pub. L. 91–513, title III, §1102(h), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1293; renumbered §7611 and amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XII, §1205(a), title XIX, §1904(b)(7)(D), (9)(E), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1699, 1815, 1816; renumbered §7612, Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title X, §1033(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1034; renumbered §7613, Pub. L. 105–206, title III, §3413(a), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 751.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–455, §1904(b)(7)(D), (9)(E), struck out pars. (1) and (2) relating to cross references to wholesale dealers in oleomargarine and wholesale dealers in process or renovated butter or adulterated butter, respectively, and redesignated pars. (5) and (6) as (1) and (2), respectively.

1970—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–513 struck out pars. (3) and (4) which related to opium, opiates, and coca leaves and to marihuana, respectively, and which made reference to sections 4702(a), 4705, 4721, and 4773, and to sections 4742, 4753(b), and 4773, respectively.

1958—Subsec. (a)(6). Pub. L. 85–859, §204(15), added par. (6).

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 85–859, §204(15), substituted "with respect to subtitle E, see section 5557" for "in connection with industrial alcohol, etc., see sections 5314 and 7302".

Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 85–859, §204(15), added par. (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–513 effective on first day of seventh calendar month that begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see section 1105(a) of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as an Effective Date note under section 951 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.

#### Effective Date of 1958 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 85–859 effective Sept. 3, 1958, see section 210(a)(1) of Pub. L. 85–859, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5001 of this title.

#### Savings Provision

Prosecutions for any violation of law occurring, and civil seizures or forfeitures and injunctive proceedings commenced, prior to the effective date of amendment of this section by section 1102 of Pub. L. 91–513 not to be affected or abated by reason thereof, see section 1103 of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as a note under sections 171 to 174 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Spies
§ 3862.3-1 Right by occupancy. ( a ) The provisions of R.S. 2332 (30 U.S.C. 38), greatly lessen the burden of proof, more especially in the case of old claims located many years since, the records of which, in many cases, have been destroyed by fire, or lost in other ways during the lapse of time, but concerning the possessory right to which all controversy or litigation has long been settled.
( b ) When an applicant desires to make his proof of possessory right in accordance with this provision of law, he will not be required to produce evidence of location, copies of conveyances, or abstracts of title, as in other cases, but will be required to furnish a duly certified copy of the statute of limitation of mining claims for the State, together with his statement giving a clear and succinct narration of the facts as to the origin of his title, and likewise as to the continuation of his possession of the mining ground covered by his application; the area thereof; the nature and extent of the mining that has been done thereon; whether there has been any opposition to his possession, or litigation with regard to his claim, and if so, when the same ceased; whether such cessation was caused by compromise or by judicial decree, and any additional facts within the claimant's knowledge having a direct bearing upon his possession and *bona fides* which he may desire to submit in support of his claim.