alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5721. Inventories

Every manufacturer or importer of tobacco products, processed tobacco, or cigarette papers and tubes, and every export warehouse proprietor, shall make a true and accurate inventory at the time of commencing business, at the time of concluding business, and at such other times, in such manner and form, and to include such items, as the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe. Such inventories shall be subject to verification by any internal revenue officer.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 713; Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §202, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1422; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 105–33, title IX, §9302(h)(2)(A), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 674; Pub. L. 111–3, title VII, §702(a)(2)(A), Feb. 4, 2009, 123 Stat. 108.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–3 inserted ", processed tobacco," after "tobacco products".

1997—Pub. L. 105–33 inserted "or importer" after "manufacturer".

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

1958—Pub. L. 85–859 substituted "manufacturer of tobacco products or cigarette papers and tubes" for "manufacturer of articles" and "internal revenue officer" for "revenue officer", and inserted provisions to include export warehouse proprietors.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2009 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–3 effective Apr. 1, 2009, see section 702(a)(6) of Pub. L. 111–3, set out as a note under section 5702 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1997 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–33 applicable to articles removed, as defined in section 5702(j) of this title, after Dec. 31, 1999, with transition rule, see section 9302(i) of Pub. L. 105–33, set out as a note under section 5701 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1958 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 85–859 effective Sept. 3, 1958, see section 210(a)(1) of Pub. L. 85–859, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5001 of this title.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Glen E. Shipley, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this reporton Form 10-Q of Internet Commerce Corporation;

2.             Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.               Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.              Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c.               Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting,, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a.               All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b.              Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 15, 2007
| By:    |   | /s/ Glen  E. Shipley    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Glen E. Shipley         |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 422.6 Responsibilities of the Chief Law Enforcement Officer. The Chief Law Enforcement Officer's (CLEO) responsibilities are to ensure that: ( a ) Law enforcement officers working at Reclamation facilities and on Federal project lands are duly authorized under § 422.7;
( b ) Law enforcement officers authorized under a contract or cooperative agreement meet training and fitness requirements established in this part and abide by standards of conduct and performance established in this part and in the contract or cooperative agreement;
( c ) Law enforcement officers are under the immediate supervision of a commanding officer who is part of each law enforcement unit for which Reclamation enters into a contract or cooperative agreement; and
( d ) Required reports are made to the LEA, or to another person designated by Reclamation, for purposes of carrying out the law enforcement functions for which Reclamation has a contract or cooperative agreement.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No: 20-21691-Civ-COOKE/REID

THEODORE KEITH GRIFFIN,

Petitioner,

v. 

MARK S. INCH,

Respondent. 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

THIS MATTER was initially docketed as a pro se Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

1983; however, upon review, United States Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid determined that 

the Petitioner’s Complaint was actually a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 9. As such, this matter was referred to Judge Reid under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B), (C); S.D. Fla. L. R. 1(f) governing Magistrate Judges; S.D. Fla. Admin. Order 

2019-02; and the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Petitions in the United States District 

Courts for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters, and for a Report and 

Recommendation on any dispositive matters. See ECF No. 2. 

On October 9, 2020, Judge Reid issued a Report recommending that this Court: 1) 

dismiss the Petition as time-barred; and 2) decline to issue a certificate of appealability. Report 

of Magistrate Judge re State Habeas Petition – 28 U.S.C. § 2554, ECF No. 9. Petitioner did not 

object to the Report and the time to do so has passed. After considering Judge Reid’s Report,

the record, and the relevant legal authorities, I find Judge Reid’s Report clear, cogent, and 

compelling. Moreover, Petitioner has not demonstrated that “jurists of reason could disagree 

with the district court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the 

issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 326 (2003); accord Lott v. Attorney Gen., Fla., 594 F.3d 1296, 1301 (11th 

Cir. 2010) (explaining that a “petitioner need not show he will ultimately succeed on appeal” in 

order to warrant a certificate of appealability). It is therefore ORDERED and ADJUDGED as 

follows:

1. Judge Reid’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 9] is APPROVED and 

Case 1:20-cv-21691-MGC Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/30/2020 Page 1 of 2
ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [ECF No. 1] is 

DISMISSED as time-barred; 

3. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED; and

4. The Clerk of Courts is directed to CLOSE this case.

DONE and ORDERED in chambers at Miami, Florida, this 29th day of October 2020. 

Copies furnished to:

The Honorable Lissette Reid, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Theodore Keith Griffin, pro se 

All Counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-21691-MGC Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/30/2020 Page 2 of 2
No. 32,638

#### The Prudential Insurance Company of America, *Appellant,*v. John E. Duncan and Rosetta Duncan, *Appellees*(The Davis-Wellcome Mortgage Company and William Shoup, *Defendants) .*

(55 P. 2d 376)

Opinion filed March 7, 1936.

*Wilford Riegle,*of Emporia, *Bennett R. Wheeler, S. M. Brewster, John L. Hunt, Margaret McGurnaghan, John II. Hunt*and *George M. Brewster,*all of Topeka, for the appellant.

*I. T. Richardson,*of Emporia, for the appellees.

The opinion of the court was delivered' by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the trial court granting an extension of the eighteen-months period *395of redemption under the provisions of the second moratorium law of 1935 (ch. 22,6).

It involves only one feature in addition to those considered and discussed in the case of the *Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. Anthony,*decided December 7, 1935, and reported in 142 Kan. 670, 52 P. 2d 1208, and that is the fact- that after the eighteen-months period of redemption had expired the defendant mortgagor filed in the district court of the United States, first division, his application for composition or extension under section 75 of the bankruptcy act, and on that account the plaintiff claimed the state district court was without jurisdiction while that application was pending in the federal court. The appellant, however, in its reply brief, filed since recent rulings on such matters, limits its grounds for error to the invalidity of the moratorium act (Laws 1935, ch. 226). So the matters now and here involved are the same as those in the Anthony case, and will not require further discussion.

The judgment is reversed.

Harvey, J., dissenting.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification by Chief Executive Officer

pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cree, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Charles M. Swoboda, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    CHARLES M.
SWOBODACharles M. SwobodaChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentOctober 20, 2009


This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
+ OMS

02/03/2010 1B: 14 FAX,

### 2024935~42A A Ktl:i 

### lUNA(

### ~~UNSEl, AEA-

# r .- _.- --_. NO, 0851-P.

### 2/2~ ___ •__**;i1'\1~,.o,.(IJ** Iv**\~,** 14rNl •


### u.s, DcIpanment Eastern R.egion 1 Aviaton Plaza - Room 561 01 Transport:dion Regional Counsel Jamaiea, NY 11434
. Telephone: 118 .553-3276 Facsimile: 718 9:;l5-5S99 Federall\v"Jation Administration January**29~** 2010 

### The Honorable Isaac D. Benk:in Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M·20 

### U.S. Depa11:ment ofTransportation 1200 

### New Jersey Avenue, S.B. East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 Washington, DC 20590
Re: FAA '\t. 

### Prospect AViation Corp. 

### Docket No. CP09EA0022 

### Dear Judge Benkin: This is to inform you the parties settled the above-referenced matter. ·Acco.tdingly, there is no longer a need for a hearing. If

### you have 

### any**questions~** please do not hesitate to 

### contact nle. Thank

### you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely. Alfred R. 

### Johnson, Jr. 

### Regional Counsel
By:. 

### Attorney

cc; Gregory C. Taylor, 

### President Prospect 

### Aviation Corp. 

### Layden C. Sadeck" Counsel Hearing Docket
Third Department,

August, 1943.

(August 2, 1943.)

#### In the Matter of William S. Richardson, Respondent. Stanley J. Taub et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Broome County, Respondents; Paul T. Gorman, Appellant.

All concur.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Commerce Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael E. Piccininni, Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




/s/ Michael E. Piccininni
--------------------------------------
Michael E. Piccininni
Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
June 18, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-13-1997
<CASH>                                         176,132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,805
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               227,447
<PP&E>                                         395,374
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,005,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,867
<BONDS>                                        732,480
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           662
<OTHER-SE>                                     997,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   997,682
<SALES>                                        108,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               233,360
<CGS>                                           40,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 71,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,942
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Veta Grippo, as Administratrix of the Estate of Alex Grippo, Deceased, Respondent, against City of Beacon, Appellant.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty. Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 11

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-12 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 1 of 3
127,&(2)SPECIAL SET HEARING

<28 $5( +(5(%< 127,),(' WKDW D 6SHFLDO 6HW KHDULQJ RQ WKH

DERYH FDXVH LV VFKHGXOHG IRU BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB RQ BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

LQ 5RRP BBBBBBBBB DW WKH 0LDPL'DGH &RXQW\ &RXUWKRXVH  :HVW )ODJOHU 6WUHHW

0LDPL )ORULGD 

&(57,),&$7(2)6(59,&(

$WUXHDQGFRUUHFWFRS\RIWKHDERYHQRWLFHZDVGHOLYHUHGWRWKHSDUWLHVEHORZRQ

BBBBB____BB________BB__.

,I\RXDUHDSHUVRQZLWKDGLVDELOLW\ZKRQHHGVDQ\DFFRPPRGDWLRQLQRUGHU

WR SDUWLFLSDWHLQ WKLV SURFHHGLQJ \RX DUH HQWLWOHG DW QR FRVW WR \RX WR WKH

SURYLVLRQRIFHUWDLQDVVLVWDQFH3OHDVHFRQWDFW$OLHDQ6LPSNLQVWKH(OHYHQWK

-XGLFLDO&LUFXLW&RXUW¶V$'$&RRUGLQDWRU/DZVRQ(7KRPDV&RXUWKRXVH

&HQWHU  1: VW $YH 6XLWH  0LDPL )/  7HOHSKRQH 

 7''   )D[   (PDLO

$'$#MXGIOFRXUWVRUJDWOHDVWVHYHQGD\VEHIRUH\RXUVFKHGXOHGFRXUW

DSSHDUDQFH RU LPPHGLDWHO\ XSRQ UHFHLYLQJ WKLV QRWLILFDWLRQ LI WKH WLPH

EHIRUH WKH VFKHGXOHG DSSHDUDQFH LV OHVV WKDQ VHYHQ  GD\V LI \RX DUH

KHDULQJRUYRLFHLPSDLUHGFDOO

,17+(&,5&8,7&28572)7+((/(9(17+-8',&,$/&,5&8,7

,1$1')250,$0,'$'(&2817<)/25,'$

&,5&8,7&,9,/',9,6,21

&$6(12

6(&7,21

3ODLQWLIIV

YV

'HIHQGDQWV

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

Filing # 107251043 E-Filed 05/08/2020 02:44:07 PM

2020-007685-CA-01

CA44

COOPERATIEVE RABOBANK U.A,. NEW YORK BRANCH et al

EISNERAMPER LLP

CMC

15 min 06-03-2020 at 10:30 AM

1307

05-08-2020

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-12 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 2 of 3
Copies Furnished to: 

Electronically Served

Cbl Section 44 Case Mgr, cbl44@jud11.flcourts.org

Scott Jay Feder, assistantscottjfeder@hotmail.com

Scott Jay Feder, scottj8@aol.com

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-12 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 3 of 3
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe effects of Reynolds number, rotor incidence angle and surface roughness on the heat transfer distribution in a large-scale turbine rotor passageA combined experimental and computational program was conducted to examine the heat transfer distribution in a turbine rotor passage geometrically similar to the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) High Pressure Fuel Turbopump (HPFTP). Heat transfer was measured and computed for both the full span suction and pressure surfaces of the rotor airfoil as well as for the hub endwall surface. The objective of the program was to provide a benchmark-quality database for the assessment of rotor heat transfer computational techniques. The experimental portion of the study was conducted in a large scale, ambient temperature, rotating turbine model. The computational portion consisted of the application of a well-posed parabolized Navier-Stokes analysis of the calculation of the three-dimensional viscous flow through ducts simulating a gas turbine package. The results of this assessment indicate that the procedure has the potential to predict the aerodynamics and the heat transfer in a gas turbine passage and can be used to develop detailed three dimensional turbulence models for the prediction of skin friction and heat transfer in complex three dimensional flow passages.Document ID19920002079Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBlair, M. F.*(United Technologies Research Center East Hartford, CT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1991Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:184260NASA-CR-184260UTRC/R91-970057-3Accession Number92N11297Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-38870Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920002079.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024