alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 D0 31 6 . ANTHONY Q. NEW MAN v . THE STATE.

An t h o n y N ewm an en t ered a n eg o t i at ed pl ea i n Au g u s t 2 01 6

. Lat er t h at m o n t h,

h e fi l ed t h e fi rs t o f m

u l t i p l e p ro s e m o t i o n s t o wi t h d raw h i s p lea. It ap p ears t h at t h e

t ri al co u rt has n o t ru l ed o n t h o se m o ti o n s. In 20 1 9

, N ewm an fi l ed a p ro s e m o t i o n to

fi le an o ut -o f-t erm m o t i on t o wi t h d raw h is g u i l ty p l ea. Th e t ri al co u rt t reat ed t h i s

fi li n g a s a m o t i o n t o wi t h d raw a g u i l t y p l ea an d d i s m i s sed it o n t h e g ro u n d t h at t h e

co u rt n o l o n g er h ad j u ri s d i ct i o n t o al l o w t h e wi th drawal o f t h e p l e a. Newm an t h en

fi led th i s t i m el y

ap pl i cat i on fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

.

Ord ers res o l vi n g o u t

- o f

-t i m e m o t i o n s t o wi t h draw g ui l t y pl eas h av e b een

t reat ed b y o u r Su prem e Co u rt as d i rect l y ap p eal ab le. See E l l i s on v

. S t a t e

, 2 8 3 Ga.

4 6 1

, 4 61 (6 6 0 SE2 d 3 7 3 ) (2 00 8 ); S m i t h v. S t a t e

, 2 8 3 Ga. 3 7 6

, 3 7 6

- 3 7 7 (6 5 9 SE2 d

3 8 0 ) (2 0 0 8 ). Th u s

, i t ap p ears t h at t h e t ri al co urt ’ s o rd er i s s ub ject t o d i rect ap p eal

. W e

wi l l g ran t a t im el y ap p l i cat io n fo r d i s cret i o nary a p p e a l i f t h e l o wer co u rt ’ s o rd er i s

s u b ject to di rect a pp eal

. See OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (j). Acco rd in g l y

, t hi s ap p li cat i o n i s

h ereb y GRANTED.

N e w m a n s h al l h av e t en d ay s fro m t h e d at e o f t h i s o rd er t o fi l e hi s n o t i c e o f

ap p eal w i t h t h e t ri al co u rt

. If h e h as al read y fi l ed a no t ice of ap peal i n t h e t ri al co u rt

, March 06, 2020h e n e e d n o t fi l e an ad d i t i o nal n o t i ce. Th e cl erk o f th e t ri al co u rt i s DIRECTED t o

i n cl u d e a co p y

o f t h i s o rd er i n t h e reco rd s t ran s m i t t ed t o t h e Co u rt o f Ap peal s

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/06/2020
Exhibit 2, Page 1 of 4

Case 0:20-cv-61023-RAR Document 36-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 1 of 4
Exhibit 2, Page 2 of 4

Case 0:20-cv-61023-RAR Document 36-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 2 of 4
Exhibit 2, Page 3 of 4

Case 0:20-cv-61023-RAR Document 36-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 3 of 4
Exhibit 2, Page 4 of 4

Case 0:20-cv-61023-RAR Document 36-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 4 of 4
Egozi & Bennett, P.A.  2999 NE 191st Street, Suite 407  Aventura, Florida 33180  Tel 305.931.3000  Fax 305.931.9343

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 1:20-cv-22050-FAM 

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL, S.A. 

and SISVEL S.p.A., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BLU PRODUCTS, INC., 

Defendant. 

 / 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

 Bernard L. Egozi of the law firm Egozi & Bennett, P.A. hereby gives notice of his 

appearance on behalf of the Defendant, BLU PRODUCTS, INC., in the above-styled cause and 

request that copies of all further notices and filings in this case be furnished to the undersigned as 

follows: 

Bernard L. Egozi, Esq. 

begozi@egozilaw.com (primary) 

yanina@egozilaw.com (secondary) 

gale@egozilaw.com (secondary) 

 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Bernard L. Egozi 

Bernard L. Egozi (Florida Bar No. 152544) 

begozi@egozilaw.com 

Yanina Zilberman (Florida Bar No. 105665) 

yanina@egozilaw.com 

EGOZI & BENNETT, P.A. 

2999 NE 191 Street, Suite 407 

Aventura, Florida 33180 

Telephone: (305) 931-3000 

Counsel for Defendant 

Case 1:20-cv-22050-DPG Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/09/2020 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

Egozi & Bennett, P.A.  2999 NE 191st Street, Suite 407  Aventura, Florida 33180  Tel 305.931.3000  Fax 305.931.9343

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by e-mail 

through the CM/ECF system on this 9th day of October, 2020, on all counsel of record on the 

service list below. 

 /s/ Bernard L. Egozi 

 Bernard L. Egozi 

Service List 

DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC 

Timothy Devlin, Esq. 

Neil A. Benchell 

1526 Gilpin Avenue 

Wilmington, DE 19806 

Tel.: (302) 449-9010 

Fax: (302) 353-4251 

tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com 

nbenchell@devlinlawfirm.com 

GRAY ROBINSON, P.A. 

Jorge Espinosa, Esq. 

Francesca Russo, Esq. 

Robert R. Jimenez, Esq. 

333 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 300 

Miami, FL 33131 

Tel.: 305-416-6880 

Fax: 305-416-6887 

jespinosa@etlaw.com 

frusso@etlaw.com 

rjimenez@etlaw.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 1:20-cv-22050-DPG Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/09/2020 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,294.82

 2,294.39

 2,293.90

 2,293.51

 2,293.12

 2,292.78

 2,292.43

 2,292.10

 2,291.74

 2,291.40

 2,291.03

 2,290.67

 2,290.49

 2,290.14

 2,289.73

 2,289.31

 2,288.95

 2,288.73

 2,288.48

 2,288.20

 2,287.96

 2,287.69

 2,287.46

 2,287.17

 2,286.90

 2,286.68

 2,286.43

 2,286.16

 2,286.04

 2,286.00

 1,401.8

 1,396.9

 1,391.3

 1,386.8

 1,382.4

 1,378.5

 1,374.6

 1,370.8

 1,366.8

 1,362.9

 1,358.8

 1,354.8

 1,352.7

 1,348.8

 1,344.3

 1,339.6

 1,335.6

 1,333.2

 1,330.4

 1,327.3

 1,324.7

 1,321.7

 1,319.2

 1,316.0

 1,313.0

 1,310.6

 1,307.9

 1,305.0

 1,303.7

 1,303.2

STORAGE

-5.1

-4.9

-5.6

-4.4

-4.4

-3.9

-4.0

-3.7

-4.1

-3.8

-4.2

-4.0

-2.0

-3.9

-4.6

-4.7

-4.0

-2.4

-2.8

-3.1

-2.6

-3.0

-2.5

-3.2

-3.0

-2.4

-2.7

-2.9

-1.3

-0.4

CHANGE

116

-98

133

-94

-131

99

139

276

191

146

87

123

59

103

-51

-29

-322

44

153

-13

90

48

165

-74

-69

76

145

-23

812

1,172

INFLOW

 2,552

 2,275

 2,896

 2,059

 2,032

 1,991

 2,044

 2,057

 2,122

 1,990

 2,091

 2,073

 996

 1,993

 2,165

 2,251

 1,626

 1,194

 1,451

 1,471

 1,389

 1,505

 1,405

 1,474

 1,356

 1,252

 1,470

 1,422

 1,423

 1,366

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 115

 111

 64

 87

 77

 53

 93

 103

 116

 86

 96

 82

 79

 85

 88

 75

 68

 75

 94

 75

 36

 36

 32

 55

 64

 32

 48

 38

 48

 26

C.F.S.

 .34

 .33

 .19

 .26

 .23

 .16

 .28

 .31

 .35

 .26

 .29

 .25

 .24

 .26

 .27

 .23

 .21

 .23

 .29

 .23

 .11

 .11

 .10

 .17

 .20

 .10

 .15

 .12

 .15

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .25

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .55

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2013 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 22, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -103.6 3,273 53,391 0 0 2,137 6.50 1.07

ACRE-FEET -103,600 6,492 105,901 0 0 4,239

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 105,901

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 105,901

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.07

JULY 1, 2013 1.18

 1,406.9

Table 4

(1) (1)
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. KENNETH DANIEL C HRESTENSEN, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-30045

D.C . No. 9:12-c r-00014-DW M M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M o nta

na Dona ld W . M olloy , Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d M arc h 10, 2014 ** B e fore : PR EGER SON, LEAVY, a n d M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s . Ke nne th Da

nie l C hre s te nse n a

ppe a ls from the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 168-m onth se nte nc e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for c o nspira c y

to distribute

m e t ham phe t am ine , in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . §§ 841(a )(1) an d 846. W e have jurisdic t ion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we 

# FIL ED MAR 13 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a ffirm .

C hre ste nse n c onte nds tha t the distric t c ourt e rre d by im p o sing a two-le ve l e nha nc e m e nt unde r U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1). First, he argue s tha

t the re wa s insuffic ie nt e vide nc e tha

t he posse s se d the re c ove re d fire arm s. C ontra

ry to the gove rnm e nt’ s c o nte ntion, C hre ste nse n did not wai ve this issue . Se eUnite d State s v . Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 733 (1993) (wa ive r is inte ntiona l re linquishme nt of a known right). Howeve r, be c a use C hre ste nse n did not raise this issue be fore the distric t c o urt, it is forfe ite d a nd we re vie w for pla in e rror. Se eUnite d State s v . Galle gos-Galindo , 704 F.3d 1269, 1272 (9th C i r. 2013). Thedistric t c o urt did not pla i nly e rr be c a

use C hre s te nse n c onc e de d tha t the re c ove re d

fire a rm s we re his. Se c ond, C hre ste nse n c o nte n ds tha t the distric t c ourt e rre d in im posing the e nha nc e m e nt be c a

use the c o nne c tion be twe e n the re c ove re d fire arm s a

nd his offe nse is c le arly

im proba b le . W e re vie w a

distric t c ourt’ s findings of fa c t for c le ar e rror. Se e Unite d State s v . Lope z-Sandov al , 146 F.3d 712, 714 (9th C ir. 1998). The re c ord re fle c ts tha t C hre ste n se n ha d we a

p ons in his re side nc e during the c ourse of his pa

rtic ipation in a

drug c onspira c y . Unde r the se c irc um sta nc e s, the d istric t c o urt did not c le arly e rr in c onc luding tha

t C hre s te nse n posse sse d fire arm s in c o nne c tion with his offe n se . Se eid . at 715-16. AFFIRM E D.
1 3 - 3 0 0 4 5 2
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Accenture SCA (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pierre Nanterme, Chief Executive Officer of Accenture plc, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Dated: October 21, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ PIERRE NANTERME                      
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Pierre Nanterme                          
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer of Accenture plc,
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | the general partner of Accenture SCA     
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | (principal executive officer)
#### Ovidio Fleti, Appellant, v. Louise F. L. Fleti, Respondent.

Order reversed, without costs, upon the ground that such an order as was entered by this court at Special Term could only be made in the action of Louise F. L. Fleti against Ovidio Fleti, and not in this action. The proceedings should be remitted to the Special Term to pass upon and determine the motion made by defendant in this action. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred; Putnam, J., not voting.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 503 

To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act to allow States 

to use incentive payments available under the child support enforcement 

program to improve parent-child relationships, increase child support 

collections, and improve outcomes for children by supporting parenting 

time agreements for noncustodial parents in uncontested agreements, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2021 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend part D of title IV of the Social Security Act 

to allow States to use incentive payments available under 

the child support enforcement program to improve parent-child relationships, increase child support collections, 

and improve outcomes for children by supporting parenting time agreements for noncustodial parents in 

uncontested agreements, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 503 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Adequate 

3 Resources to Enhance Needed Time with Sons and daugh4 ters Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘PARENTS Act of 2021’’. 

5 SEC. 2. EXPANDING PERMITTED USES OF INCENTIVE PAY6 MENTS. 

7 Section 458 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 658a) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (f)— 

10 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘; or’’ 

11 and inserting a semicolon; 

12 (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as 

13 paragraph (3); and 

14 (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the 

15 following new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(2) to develop, implement, and evaluate proce17 dures for establishing a parenting time agreement 

18 when establishing an initial or modified child sup19 port order or a medical support order (including pro20 cedures for carrying out a parenting time agreement 

21 made prior to the establishment or modification of 

22 any such order); or’’; and 

23 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub24 section: 

25 ‘‘(g) DEFINITIONS OF PARENTING TIME AGREEMENT

26 AND NONCUSTODIAL PARENT.— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 503 IS

1 ‘‘(1) PARENTING TIME AGREEMENT.—For pur2 poses of subsection (f)(2), the term ‘parenting time 

3 agreement’ means an agreement governing how 

4 much time a child spends with the child’s custodial 

5 parent and the child’s noncustodial parent that is 

6 mutually agreed to by the parents and is not con7 tested by either parent in any forum. 

8 ‘‘(2) NONCUSTODIAL PARENT.—For purposes 

9 of paragraph (1), the term ‘noncustodial parent’ 

10 means the parent of a child that the child does not 

11 live with for the majority of the child’s time.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Served: November 10, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 10th of November, 2011

INTRA ALASKA SERVICE MAIL RATES Docket OST-2003-14694

Docket OST-2003-14695

NOTICE OF MAIL RATE MEETINGS IN ANCHORAGE

By Order 2011-10-3 the Department indicated in ordering paragraph three (3) that there would be 

informal meetings with the parties regarding mail rate issues in general, and specifically those 

discussed in that order.

Based upon preliminary discussions with the parties, the meetings in Anchorage will be on 

December 1 and December 2 of this year. Joy Journeay has indicated that the Alaska Air 

Carriers Association will provide the room, and has suggested the meetings be held from 9 am to 

4 pm each day. 

Dennis DeVany, Chief,

EAS and Domestic Analysis
### §1494. Evidence of eligibility of loan for and amount of guaranty or insurance; defenses and partial defenses against original lender

Any evidence of guaranty or insurance issued by the Secretary shall be conclusive evidence of the eligibility of the loan for guaranty or insurance under the provisions of this chapter and the amount of such guaranty or insurance: Provided, That nothing in this section shall preclude the Secretary from establishing, as against the original lender, defenses based on fraud or material misrepresentation or bar him from establishing, by regulations in force at the date of such issuance or disbursement, whichever is the earlier, partial defenses to the amount payable on the guaranty or insurance.

(Pub. L. 93–262, title II, §214, Apr. 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 81.)
600 North 18 th Street **P ERSONAL AND**  **C ONFIDENTIAL** 

Post Office Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 Tel 205.257.1000

October 12, 2011 BY EMAIL Lisa A. Biddle United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water (4100T) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 **Re: Proposed**  **National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Rule for Cooling Water Intake Structures at Existing Facilities and Phase I Facilities, Docket**  **ID No. EPA -** **HQ -**  **OW -** **2008 -**  **0667** Ms. Biddle : Enclosed please find the October 2004
- October 2005 actual impingement data (raw) for species , with daily

creel limits for recreational fishermen, collected at Alabama Power Company ’s (“Alabama Power”) Electric Generating Plants . You requested the data in a September 26, 2011 email to me and my c olleagues in response to Alabama Power’s August 18, 2011 comment letter to the above
-referenced proposed rule
. The data was collected every two weeks during 25 separate 24 hour (daily) events at each facility ’s intake structure for a period of one year. Species Barry Intake Greene Co. Intake Gorgas Intake Gadsden Gaston Unit 1
- 3 Unit 4
- 5 Unit 1
- 2 Unit 6
- 7 Unit 8
- 10 Unit 1
- 2 Unit 1
- 5 Paddlefish 7 54 0 0 1 0 0 Alligator Gar 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 White, Yellow, or Striped Basses 78 36 3 6 92 1 14 Black Basses 15 58 3 1 14 0 1 Bream 161 147 64 26 62 13 63 Crappie 653 1702 6 2 12 0 1October 12, 2011 **P ERSONAL AND**  **C ONFIDENTIAL** 

Page 2

1178275.1 In its August 18 letter, Alabama Power requested that the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) establish a de minimis ex ception to its annual (12 percent) and monthly ( 31 percent) impingement mortality (“IM”) numeric standards to prevent facilities that have already achieved reduced IM levels from being penalized over small quantities of IMinstances. Alabama Power referenced state creel limits to illustrate that, in some instances , regulated facilities are impinging certain species of fish at a rate less than one recreational fisherman is allowed to take from Alabama waters for a given ye ar. Alabama Power made the comparison with annual estimates derived from the raw data above. Alabama Power maintains that this illustration is compelling and supports the establishment of a de minimis exception to the percentage IM standards. However, Alabama Power is not advocating that any such de minimis exception for recreational fish or other impingible organisms be based on any state’s creel limits. Should EPA determine that a de minimis exception should be established

— which it should

— Alabama Power would like the chance to provide additional comments or help the agency develop that standard
. Thank you for requesting this additional information and for your consideration of Alabama Power’s August 18, 2011 comments on the above
-referenced proposed rule. S hould you have any questions regarding the enclosed data or another matter, please feel f ree to contact Charles Stover (cmstover@southernco.com), Tim George (tgeorge@southernco.com), or me. Sincerely,
Mike Godfrey, Manager Environmental Compliance (jgodfrey@southernco.com)
Exhibit 32

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brightec, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Patrick Planche, President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ PATRICK PLANCHE
---------------------------------------
Patrick Planche, President,
Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
November 19, 2007



                                      E-9
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


War of 1812





Contact Us
  People of the War of 1812
 Browse People Portrait of First Lady Dolley MadisonAmericans
Men and women of all races and backgrounds contributed to the war effort
Portrait of Isaac BrockBritish
From Canada to Australia, British subjects called six continents home. Few of these people were enthusiastic about the war.
Portrait of the Prophet, TenskatawaIndigenous Peoples
Native people living on both sides of the American-Canadian border became reluctantly embroiled in the conflict
 Last updated: January 6, 2015
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr