alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000737210
<NAME> LNB BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          20,117
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             482
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     30,662
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          87,862
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            88,751
<LOANS>                                        329,712
<ALLOWANCE>                                     (4,360)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 489,928
<DEPOSITS>                                     412,572
<SHORT-TERM>                                    25,102
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,422
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,222
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 489,928
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,295
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,771
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    60
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,126
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,139
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,435
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,691
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      187
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,544
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,678
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,678
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.97
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,078
<LOANS-PAST>                                       645
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,459
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,168
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       42
<RECOVERIES>                                        47
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,360
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,757
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            403
                           

</TABLE>
OLEM/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Proposed Site*** April 2016 

NORTH 25THSTREET GLASS AND ZINC Clarksburg, West Virginia 

Harrison County 

 Site Location:

The site is located on the bank of the West Fork River in north central West Virginia. 

 Site History:

The site was used for glass manufacturing from 1899 through 1989 and for zinc ore processing from 1911 to 1924.

One current owner of the property is Harrison Warehouse Services Company, Inc., which uses the large warehouse 

on the property for the storage of recycled paper for a pulp facility. Part of the property is leased to an automobile repair 

service, and one parcel of the site containing a zinc pile is owned by a private citizen. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

Soils on the property, ground water and sediments in the West Fork River are contaminated with lead, arsenic and zinc 

from the former glass and zinc manufacturing processes. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

There is a large zinc slag pile on the property which also contains lead. The zinc slag pile is accessible to the public and is 

eroding into the West Fork River which is used for recreation and fishing. There may also have been migration of 

contaminants from the site into residential areas due to historical air contaminant releases from the smokestacks during the 

time of operation. In addition, the Harrison County Parks and Recreation Commission leases an area on the western 

boundary of the property for use as a rails-to-trails bike path. The site is accessible from the bike path. 

 Response Activities (to date):

The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) requested the EPA’s assistance in cleaning up an

area along the bike path which was found to contain elevated levels of lead, zinc and arsenic. In 2010, EPA’s Superfund 

Removal Program stabilized the area and capped it with asphalt. 

 Need for NPL Listing:

The state of West Virginia referred the site to the EPA because of the opportunity for both removal and long term cleanup. 

Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable at this time because they would not address the 

entire site, including the contaminated riversediments. The EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL

from the state. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may 

change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or 

subsequent FR notices.] 

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these 

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet 

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
### §6313. Fractional parts of a cent

In the payment of any tax imposed by this title, a fractional part of a cent shall be disregarded unless it amounts to one-half cent or more, in which case it shall be increased to 1 cent.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 778; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(a)(19), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1825.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "not payable by stamp" after "title".
No. 32,545

#### The State of Kansas, *Appellant,*v. George E. Rogers, Herman A. Hill and John F. Millhaupt, *Appellees.*

(54 P. 2d 1211)

Opinion denying motion for rehearing and modification of opinion, filed February 11, 1936.

(For original opinion of reversal see 142 Kan. 841, 52 P. 2d 1185.)

*Clarence V. Beck,*attorney general, *Earl B. Swarner,*assistant attorney general, and *Sidney L. Eoulston,*county attorney, for the appellant.

*W. D. Jocliems,*of Wichita, special prosecutor.

*H. W. Hart, A. V.'Roberts*and *Jesse D. Wall,*all of Wichita, for the appellees.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

Defendants have filed a petition for rehearing. The state has filed its answer thereto, and has requested modification of a portion of the opinion dealing with the effect of a contract referred to in the course of the opinion.

All matters raised by defendants’ petition for rehearing which were presented on the appeal have been previously considered and determined. The petition for rehearing is denied.

Touching the request of the state for modification of our opinion, the effect of the contract is not specifically before us for present adjudication; but our opinion should not be construed to mean that if the county commissioners made a contract for the payment of an amount which was in fact a violation of R. S. 19-242, such alleged contract could be a defense to the charge alleged in the indictment.

The motions for rehearing and for modification are denied.
#### Edward Schlesinger, Doing Business under the Name of Keystone Tire Company, Respondent, v. A. Schulman, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
§ 45.13 What are the requirements for service of documents? ( a ) *Filed documents.* Any document related to a case under this subpart must be served at the same time the document is delivered or sent for filing. Copies must be served as follows: ( 1 ) A complete copy of any request for a hearing under § 45.21 must be delivered or sent to FERC and each license party, using one of the methods of service in paragraph (c) of this section or under 18 CFR 385.2010(f)(3) for license parties that have agreed to receive electronic service.
( 2 ) A complete copy of any notice of intervention and response under § 45.22 must be: ( i ) Delivered or sent to FERC, the license applicant, any person who has filed a request for hearing under § 45.21, and any bureau, using one of the methods of service in paragraph (c) of this section; and
( ii ) Delivered or sent to any other license party using one of the methods of service in paragraph (c) of this section or under 18 CFR 385.2010(f)(3) for license parties that have agreed to receive electronic service, or by regular mail.
( 3 ) A complete copy of any answer or notice under § 45.25 and any other document filed by any party to the hearing process must be delivered or sent on every other party to the hearing process, using one of the methods of service in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Documents issued by the Hearings Division or ALJ.* A complete copy of any notice, order, decision, or other document issued by the Hearings Division or the ALJ under this subpart must be served on each party, using one of the methods of service in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Method of service.* Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties and ordered by the ALJ, service must be accomplished by one of the following methods: ( 1 ) By hand delivery of the document;
( 2 ) By sending the document by express mail or courier service for delivery on the next business day;
( 3 ) By sending the document by facsimile if: ( i ) The document is 20 pages or less, including all attachments;
( ii ) The sending facsimile machine confirms that the transmission was successful; and
( iii ) The document is sent by regular mail on the same day; or
( 4 ) By sending the document, including all attachments, by electronic means if the party to be served has consented to that means of service in writing. However, if the serving party learns that the document did not reach the party to be served, the serving party must re-serve the document by another method set forth in paragraph (c) of this section (including another electronic means, if the party to be served has consented to that means in writing).
( d ) *Certificate of service.* A certificate of service must be attached to each document filed under this subpart. The certificate must be signed by the party's representative and include the following information: ( 1 ) The name, address, and other contact information of each party's representative on whom the document was served;
( 2 ) The means of service, including information indicating compliance with paragraph (c)(3) or (c)(4) of this section, if applicable; and
( 3 ) The date of service.
#### § 5441.1-2 SBA set-aside sales.

Only bids of small business concerns which have filed a self-certification statement as required by § 5441.1 may be considered for sales subject to set-asides. When no such bids are received, the timber may be sold under § 5443.1 in the same manner as timber not previously made subject to a set-aside. When timber subject to a set-aside is not sold for any other reason, the sale may be rescheduled for a set-aside sale.

[35 FR 9785, June 13, 1970. Redesignated at 85 FR 82375, Dec. 18, 2020]
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Volunteer With Us
#### § 4.452-2 Notice of hearing.

The administrative law judge shall fix a place and date for the hearing and notify all parties and the Bureau at least 30 days in advance of the date set, unless the parties and the Bureau request or consent to an earlier date. The notice shall include (a) the time, place, and nature of the hearing, (b) the legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held, and (c) the matters of fact and law asserted. All hearings held in connection with land selection appeals arising under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, as amended, shall be conducted within the state of Alaska, unless the parties agree otherwise.

[47 FR 26392, June 18, 1982]
(No. 892

Claimant awarded $495.00.)

#### Watson H. Allen, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Non-liability of *state*— when *State not liable. III. & Mich. Canal.*The State is not liable for damages to land and crops caused by an overflow of • water from the Illinois and Michigan Canal.

Social justice and *equity*— axoard *may be made.*Although the State is not legally liable for damages to lands and crops of claimant caused by overflow of water from the 111. & Mich. Canal, an award may be made to claimant on ground of social justice and equity.

Lee O’Neil Browne, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for damage sustained by claimant to his land and crops by reason of the overflow from waters of the Illinois' and Michigan canal on August 8, 1924, damages to crops amounting to $495.00.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, is, as a matter of law, sustained.

On the grounds of social justice and equity, we award claimant the sum of $495.00.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             841
<SECURITIES>                                     2,847
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,984
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,338
<PP&E>                                          11,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,689
<BONDS>                                          3,355
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,011
<SALES>                                         19,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,363
<CGS>                                            6,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,598
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    793
<INCOME-TAX>                                       269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                526
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       526
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           13008
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                168419
<PP&E>                                          388629
<DEPRECIATION>                                  267794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2023586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6970075
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                         14659
<OTHER-SE>                                   (4961149)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2023586
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 28925<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1961736
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              108942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1932811)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1961736)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1932811)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Share of net income in jointly controlled company.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General
Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures Inc.





|Date: March 28, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|-------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                     |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThermal relics: Do we know their abundancesThe relic abundance of a particle species that was once in thermal equilibrium in the expanding Universe depends upon a competition between the annihilation rate of the species and the expansion rate of the Universe. Assuming that the Universe is radiation dominated at early times the relic abundance is easy to compute and well known. At times earlier than about 1 sec after the bang there is little or no evidence that the Universe had to be radiation dominated, although that is the simplest and standard assumption. Because early-Universe relics are of such importance both to particle physics and to cosmology, three nonstandard possibilities are considered in detail for the Universe at the time a species' abundance froze in: energy density dominated by shear (i.e., anisotropic expansion), energy density dominated by some other nonrelativistic species, and energy density dominated by the kinetic energy of the scalar field that sets the gravitational constant in a Brans-Dicke-Jordan cosmological mode. In the second case the relic abundance is less than the standard value, while in the other two cases it can be enhanced by a significant factor. Two other more exotic possibilities for enhancing the relic abundance of a species are also mentioned--a larger value of Newton's constant at early times (e.g., as might occur in superstring or Kaluza-Klein theories) or a component of the energy density at early times with a very stiff equation of state (p greater than rho/3), e.g., a scalar field phi with potential V(phi) = Beta /phi/ (exp n) with n greater than 4. Results have implications for dark matter searches and searches for particle relics in general.Document ID19900014897Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKamionkowski, Marc*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL, United States)*Turner, Michael S.*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategoryAstrophysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:183334NASA-CR-183334FERMILAB-PUB-90/97-AAccession Number90N24213Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-1340Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014897.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §7486. Refund, credit, or abatement of amounts disallowed

In cases where assessment or collection has not been stayed by the filing of a bond, then if the amount of the deficiency determined by the Tax Court is disallowed in whole or in part by the court of review, the amount so disallowed shall be credited or refunded to the taxpayer, without the making of claim therefor, or, if collection has not been made, shall be abated.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 891.)