alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 404.34 Can Reclamation reduce the amount of non-Federal cost-share required for a feasibility study? Yes. Reclamation may reduce the non-Federal cost-share required for a feasibility study to an amount less than 50 percent of the study costs if: ( a ) Reclamation determines that there is an overwhelming Federal interest in conducting the feasibility study, and you demonstrate financial hardship. Financial hardship will be determined in accordance with Reclamation's standards, which are available at your local Reclamation office; and
( b ) Reclamation consults with other Federal agencies that are partners in the project and determines that a reduction in the non-Federal cost-share is appropriate.
vV-ii^VIcNl OF 

O OER AS Memorandu m 

U.S Department of l-'^^ 'An 2 b ^-^ 3= 5M 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

/ 

Subject: Change to EAS billing fof SkyWcst at Ccdar City, UT Date" January 27, 2012 

From: Dennis J. DeVany, Chief Michael Martin. X-53 

EAS and Domestic Analysis, X-53 ^^'- ^^"^"^ 

To: Gregory Frazier, S-3.6 

Reference: Order 2011-9-10 

As stated in the Appendix to Order 2011-9-10, SkyWest, operating as Delta Connection, 

proposed EAS at Cedar City using 50-passenger seat Canadair Regional Jet aircraft. 

However, SkyWest has informed us that Cedar City does not have the required 

operational permits for scheduled jet service. Therefore, SkyWest will substitute 30-

passenger seat Embraer EMB120 aircraft from January 1, 2012, until they inform us 

otherwise. We request that you please compensate accordingly. 

cc: 

Mike Thompson, SkyWest Airlines, hic. 

Brad Rawson, SkyWest Airlines, hic.
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

★▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/22

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

● ★

●

●

●

★

● ● ● ●
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnnotated bibliography of software engineering laboratory literatureAn annotated bibliography of technical papers, documents, and memorandums produced by or related to the Software Engineering Laboratory is given. More than 100 publications are summarized. These publications cover many areas of software engineering and range from research reports to software documentation. This document has been updated and reorganized substantially since the original version (SEL-82-006, November 1982). All materials have been grouped into eight general subject areas for easy reference: the Software Engineering Laboratory; the Software Engineering Laboratory-software development documents; software tools; software models; software measurement; technology evaluations; Ada technology; and data collection. Subject and author indexes further classify these documents by specific topic and individual author.Document ID19910007289Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeOther - OtherAuthorsGroves, Paula*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Valett, Jon*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103415SEL-82-906NAS 1.15:103415Accession Number91N16602Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007289.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 404.32 Can Reclamation reduce the non-Federal cost-share required for an appraisal investigation? Yes. Reclamation may reduce the non-Federal cost-share for appraisal investigations below 50 percent of the costs exceeding $200,000, if: ( a ) Reclamation determines that there is an overwhelming Federal interest in conducting the appraisal investigation, and you demonstrate financial hardship. Financial hardship will be determined in accordance with Reclamation's official policies, guidance and standards, which are available at your local Reclamation office; and
( b ) Reclamation consults with other Federal agencies that are partners in the project and determines that a reduction in the non-Federal cost-share is appropriate.
#### § 41.605 Enforcement procedures.

The investigative, compliance, and enforcement procedural provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) (“Title VI”) are hereby adopted and applied to these Title IX regulations. These procedures may be found at 10 CFR 4.21 through 4.75.

[65 FR 52892, Aug. 30, 2000]
§ 4750.4-1 Private Maintenance and Care Agreement. To obtain a wild horse or burro, a qualified applicant shall execute a Private Maintenance and Care Agreement and agree to abide by its terms and conditions, including but not limited to the following: ( a ) Title to wild horses and burros covered by the agreement shall remain in the Federal Government for at least 1 year after the Private Maintenance and Care Agreement is executed and until a Certificate of Title is issued by the authorized officer;
( b ) Wild horses and burros covered by the agreement shall not be transferred for more than 30 days to another location or to the care of another individual without the prior approval of the authorized officer;
( c ) Wild horses and burros covered by the agreement shall be made available for physical inspection within 7 days of receipt of a written request by the authorized officer;
( d ) The authorized officer shall be notified within 7 days of discovery of the death, theft or escape of wild horses and burros covered by the agreement;
( e ) Adopters are financially responsible for the proper care and treatment of all wild horses and burros covered by the agreement;
( f ) Adopters are responsible, as provided by State law, for any personal injury, property damage, or death caused by animals in their care; for pursuing animals that escape or stray; and for costs of recapture.
( g ) Adopters shall notify the authorized officer within 30 days of any change in the adopter's address; and
( h ) Adopters shall dispose of remains in accordance with applicable sanitation laws.
#### § 3435.0-1 Purpose.

The objective of these regulations is to provide methods for exchange of coal resources when it would be in the public interest to shift the impact of mineral operations from leased lands or portions of leased lands to currently unleased lands to preserve public resource or social values, and to carry out Congressional directives authorizing coal lease exchanges.

[44 FR 42628, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33144, July 30, 1982]
#### Frank A. Fichter, Respondent, v. Lillian A. Hall and Others, Appellants.

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
### §7123. Appeals dispute resolution procedures

#### (a) Early referral to appeals procedures

The Secretary shall prescribe procedures by which any taxpayer may request early referral of 1 or more unresolved issues from the examination or collection division to the Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals.

#### (b) Alternative dispute resolution procedures

#### (1) Mediation

The Secretary shall prescribe procedures under which a taxpayer or the Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals may request non-binding mediation on any issue unresolved at the conclusion of—

(A) appeals procedures; or

(B) unsuccessful attempts to enter into a closing agreement under section 7121 or a compromise under section 7122.

#### (2) Arbitration

The Secretary shall establish a pilot program under which a taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals may jointly request binding arbitration on any issue unresolved at the conclusion of—

(A) appeals procedures; or

(B) unsuccessful attempts to enter into a closing agreement under section 7121 or a compromise under section 7122.

#### (c) Administrative appeal relating to adverse determination of tax-exempt status of certain organizations

#### (1) In general

The Secretary shall prescribe procedures under which an organization which claims to be described in section 501(c) may request an administrative appeal (including a conference relating to such appeal if requested by the organization) to the Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals of an adverse determination described in paragraph (2).

#### (2) Adverse determinations

For purposes of paragraph (1), an adverse determination is described in this paragraph if such determination is adverse to an organization with respect to—

(A) the initial qualification or continuing qualification of the organization as exempt from tax under section 501(a) or as an organization described in section 170(c)(2),

(B) the initial classification or continuing classification of the organization as a private foundation under section 509(a), or

(C) the initial classification or continuing classification of the organization as a private operating foundation under section 4942(j)(3).

(Added Pub. L. 105–206, title III, §3465(a)(1), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 768; amended Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title IV, §404(a), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3118; Pub. L. 116–25, title I, §1001(b)(1)(G), July 1, 2019, 133 Stat. 985.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7123 was renumbered section 7124 of this title.

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–25 substituted "Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals" for "Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals" wherever appearing.

2015—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–113 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2015 Amendment

Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title IV, §404(b), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3118, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to determinations made on or after May 19, 2014."
[Cite as State v. Craft , 2019-Ohio-2079.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,

Appellee,

- vs -

PAUL DILLON CRAFT,

Appellant. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO. CA2018-09-187

D E C I S I O N

5/28/2019

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case No. CR2018-02-0201

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Michael Greer, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellee

Scott N. Blauvelt, 315 South Monument Avenue, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellant

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, Paul Dillon Craft, the transcript of t he docket and journal entries, the transcript of

proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon

a brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review ofButler CA2018-09-187

- 2 - the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;

(2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason

that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.[Cite as State v. Craft , 2019-Ohio-2079.]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
G. Filer II, Chief Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ William G. Filer II
-----------------------------------------------------
William G. Filer II
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 29, 2005
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3971 — Deutsche Post/Exel)

(2005/C 263/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
#### § 105.208 Penalties.

Any employee guilty of violating any of the provisions in this part may be disciplined, including removal or suspension from SBA employment.
### [§215. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §11051(a), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2089]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 71; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §422(b), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 797, related to a deduction for alimony or separate maintenance payments paid during an individual's taxable year.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to any divorce or separation instrument (as defined in former section 71(b)(2) of this title as in effect before Dec. 22, 2017) executed after Dec. 31, 2018, and to such instruments executed on or before Dec. 31, 2018, and modified after Dec. 31, 2018, if the modification expressly provides that the amendment made by section 11051 of Pub. L. 115–97 applies to such modification, see section 11051(c) of Pub. L. 115–97, set out as an Effective Date of 2017 Amendment note under section 61 of this title.
J. 

EMEEORM 1262WEEFIBIEMEASCHE 

conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

/ its,c 

Hardesty 

Parraguirr 

v V&A> , J. 

Cherry 

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge 

Ladontay R. Davis 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
### §176. Payments with respect to employees of certain foreign corporations

In the case of a domestic corporation, there shall be allowed as a deduction amounts (to the extent not compensated for) paid or incurred pursuant to an agreement entered into under section 3121(l) with respect to services performed by United States citizens employed by foreign subsidiary corporations. Any reimbursement of any amount previously allowed as a deduction under this section shall be included in gross income for the taxable year in which received.

(Added Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1206, title II, §210(a), 68 Stat. 1096.)
### §7470A. Judicial conference

#### (a) Judicial conference

The chief judge may summon the judges and special trial judges of the Tax Court to an annual judicial conference, at such time and place as the chief judge shall designate, for the purpose of considering the business of the Tax Court and recommending means of improving the administration of justice within the jurisdiction of the Tax Court. The Tax Court shall provide by its rules for representation and active participation at such conferences by persons admitted to practice before the Tax Court and by other persons active in the legal profession.

#### (b) Registration fee

The Tax Court may impose a reasonable registration fee on persons (other than judges and special trial judges of the Tax Court) participating at judicial conferences convened pursuant to subsection (a). Amounts so received by the Tax Court shall be available to the Tax Court to defray the expenses of such conferences.

(Added Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title IV, §432(a), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3126.)
### §6712. Failure to disclose treaty-based return positions

#### (a) General rule

If a taxpayer fails to meet the requirements of section 6114, there is hereby imposed a penalty equal to $1,000 ($10,000 in the case of a C corporation) on each such failure.

#### (b) Authority to waive

The Secretary may waive all or any part of the penalty provided by this section on a showing by the taxpayer that there was reasonable cause for the failure and that the taxpayer acted in good faith.

#### (c) Penalty in addition to other penalties

The penalty imposed by this section shall be in addition to any other penalty imposed by law.

(Added Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1012(aa)(5)(B), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3532.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 6712 was renumbered section 6713 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to taxable periods the due date for filing returns for which (without extension) occurs after Dec. 31, 1988, see section 1012(aa)(5)(D) of Pub. L. 100–647, set out as a note under section 6114 of this title.
#### § 3802.4-4 Fire prevention and control.

The operator shall comply with all applicable Federal and State fire laws and regulations, and shall take all reasonable measures to prevent and suppress fires on the area of mining operations.
#### § 9239.6 Materials.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 6, 2013

h1105

Order 

Clerk

November 6, 2013

146478

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146478

COA: 307758

St. Clair CC: 06-001700-FC

RAYMOND CURTIS CARP,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, leave to appeal having been granted in this case, the 

time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.315(B). We 

invite the State Appellate Defender Office to participate in oral argument by sharing time 

with counsel for the defendant.
FIELD APPLICA TION **R2 R1**  **R3 R4** 

AT TA CHMENT TEN PMN Substance T wo CONFIDENTIAL
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4956 

To modify the authority for humanitarian demining assistance and stockpiled 

conventional munitions assistance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2022 

Ms. ERNST introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To modify the authority for humanitarian demining 

assistance and stockpiled conventional munitions assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY FOR HUMANI4 TARIAN DEMINING ASSISTANCE AND STOCK5 PILED CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ASSIST6 ANCE. 

7 (a) EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a)(1) 

8 of section 407 of title 10, United States Code, is amend9 ed— 

10 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4956 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘carry out’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘provide’’; and 

3 (B) by striking ‘‘in a country’’ and insert4 ing ‘‘to a country’’; and 

5 (2) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘in which 

6 the activities are to be carried out’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘to which the assistance is to be provided’’. 

8 (b) EXPENSES.—Subsection (c) of such section is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the 

11 following new subparagraph: 

12 ‘‘(C) Travel, transportation, and subsist13 ence expenses of foreign personnel to attend 

14 training provided by the Department of Defense 

15 under this section.’’; and 

16 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking 

17 ‘‘$15,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’. 

18 (c) ANNUAL REPORT.—Subsection (d) of such sec19 tion is amended— 

20 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 

21 striking ‘‘include in the annual report under section 

22 401 of this title a separate discussion of’’ and insert23 ing ‘‘submit to the Committee on Armed Services 

24 and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Sen25 ate and the Committee on Armed Services and the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4956 IS

1 Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep2 resentatives a report on’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (1)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘in which’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘to which’’; and 

6 (B) by striking ‘‘carried out’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘provided’’; 

8 (3) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘carried out 

9 in’’ and inserting ‘‘provided to’’; 

10 (4) in paragraph (3)— 

11 (A) by striking ‘‘in which’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘to which’’; and 

13 (B) by striking ‘‘carried out’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘provided’’; and 

15 (5) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘in carrying 

16 out such assistance in each such country’’ and in17 serting ‘‘in providing such assistance to each such 

18 country’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB