alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Renewable Energy
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Natural Resources Conservation Service 

# AGENCY:

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Agriculture. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of proposed changes in Section IV of the FOTG of the NRCS in Indiana for review and comment. 

# SUMMARY:

It is the intention of NRCS in Indiana to issue five revised conservation practice standards in Section IV of the FOTG. The revised standards are: Animal Mortality Facility (316); Composting Facility (317); Closure of Waste Impoundment (360); Stripcropping (585) and Underground Outlet (620). These practices may be used in conservation systems that treat highly erodible land and/or wetlands. 

# DATES:

Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with this date of publication. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        Address all requests and comments to Jane E. Hardisty, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 6013 Lakeside Blvd., Indianapolis, Indiana 46278. Copies of this standard will be made available upon written request. You may submit your electronic requests and comments to                         *darrell.brown@in.usda.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jane E. Hardisty, 317-290-3200.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that after enactment of the law, revisions made to NRCS state technical guides used to carry out highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law, shall be made available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS in Indiana will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in Indiana regarding disposition of those comments and a final determination of changes will be made. 

Dated: September 22, 2004. 

Jane E. Hardisty, 

State Conservationist, Indianapolis, Indiana. 

[FR Doc. 04-22587 Filed 10-6-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Massachusetts Shakers

Activity FeeYes

## ** Tags

            -  shakers 
            -  american utopias 
            -  massachusetts 
            -  national register of historic places 
            -  travel itineraries 
            -  travel shaker trail 

Photo courtesy of the Massachusetts Office of Travel & Tourism

Do you live in, or are you traveling to, Massachusetts? Take time to visit three historic Shaker villages within the site. Hancock Shaker Village in Berkshire County, Harvard Shaker Village in Worcester County, and Shirley Shaker Village in Middlesex County are all open to the public. Tyringham Shaker Historic District, in Berkshire County, is not open to the public.Managed by Hancock Shaker Village, visitors will learn about the life of the Hancock Shakers, tour historic buildings, and be able to participate in several events and workshops.This website about Harvard Shaker Village provides historical documentation and photos, providing visitors with information and context before they visit the site.Shirley Shaker Village is managed by the Shirley Historical Society. They provide guided tours of the Village and resources for additional information on the Shirley Shakers.

## ** Tags

        -  shakers 
        -  american utopias 
        -  massachusetts 
        -  national register of historic places 
        -  travel itineraries 
        -  travel shaker trail 

Last updated: February 28, 2018

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Prohibition & Temperance
PUBLIC LAW 106–201—MAY 18, 2000 114 STAT. 307

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1744:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–194 (Comm. on Environment and Public Works).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 146 (2000):

Mar. 27, considered and passed Senate.

May 2, 3, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 106–201

106th Congress

An Act

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that certain species

conservation reports shall continue to be required to be submitted.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN SPECIES

CONSERVATION REPORTS.

(a) ANNUAL COST ANALYSIS.—Section 18 of the Endangered

Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1544) is amended by striking ‘‘On’’

and inserting ‘‘Notwithstanding section 3003 of Public Law 104–

66 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note; 109 Stat. 734), on’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by this section

takes effect on the earlier of—

(1) the date of enactment of this Act; or

(2) December 19, 1999.

Approved May 18, 2000.

16 USC 1544

note.

May 18, 2000

[S. 1744]
§ 50.14 What information about the ratification referendum must be included in the request? The written narrative thoroughly describing the ratification referendum must include the following information: ( a ) A certification of the results of the ratification referendum including: ( 1 ) The date or dates of the ratification referendum;
( 2 ) The number of Native Hawaiians, regardless of whether they were HHCA Native Hawaiians, who cast a vote in favor of the governing document;
( 3 ) The total number of Native Hawaiians, regardless of whether they were HHCA Native Hawaiians, who cast a ballot in the ratification referendum;
( 4 ) The number of HHCA Native Hawaiians who cast a vote in favor of the governing document; and
( 5 ) The total number of HHCA Native Hawaiians who cast a ballot in the ratification referendum.
( b ) A description of how the Native Hawaiian community conducted the ratification referendum that demonstrates: ( 1 ) How and when the Native Hawaiian community made the full text of the proposed governing document (and a brief impartial description of that document) available to Native Hawaiians prior to the ratification referendum, through the Internet, the news media, and other means of communication;
( 2 ) How and when the Native Hawaiian community notified Native Hawaiians about how and when it would conduct the ratification referendum;
( 3 ) How the Native Hawaiian community accorded Native Hawaiians a reasonable opportunity to vote in the ratification referendum;
( 4 ) How the Native Hawaiian community prevented voters from casting more than one ballot in the ratification referendum; and
( 5 ) How the Native Hawaiian community ensured that the ratification referendum: ( i ) Was free and fair;
( ii ) Was held by secret ballot or equivalent voting procedures;
( iii ) Was open to all persons who were verified as satisfying the definition of a Native Hawaiian (consistent with § 50.12) and were 18 years of age or older, regardless of residency;
( iv ) Did not include in the vote tallies votes cast by persons who were not Native Hawaiians; and
( v ) Did not include in the vote tallies for HHCA Native Hawaiians votes cast by persons who were not HHCA Native Hawaiians.
( c ) A description of how the Native Hawaiian community verified whether a potential voter in the ratification referendum was a Native Hawaiian and whether that potential voter was also an HHCA Native Hawaiian, consistent with § 50.12.
#### § 3102.52 Certification of compliance.

Any party(s) seeking to obtain an interest in a lease must certify that it is in compliance with the Act as set forth in 43 CFR 3102.51. A corporation or publicly traded association, including a publicly traded partnership, must certify that constituent members of the corporation, association or partnership holding or controlling more than 10 percent of the instruments of ownership of the corporation, association or partnership are in compliance with the Act. Execution and submission of a competitive bid form or request for approval of a transfer of record title or of operating rights (sublease), constitutes certification of compliance.
(No. 948

Claim denied.)

#### E-Z Opener Bag Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 29, 1927.*

Franchise *tax*— when *court without jurisdiction to refund.*Where the claimant has an adequate *remedy at law in a*court of general jurisdiction to recover the tax paid by mistake, the court will not take jurisdiction of his claim.

McDavid *&*Monroe, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney *General ;*David J. Kadyk, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for a refund of franchise tax in excess of that which should have been paid and which was paid under a mistake of fact as contended by the claimant. It appears to the court that the essence of claimant’s contention arose through the fact that certain questions were not answered and certain other questions were improperly answered in an. annual report filed with the Secretary of State by claimant on February 17,1925. It would further appear to the court that ■ if the questions in said” report were fully and properly *309answered by the claimant that the error complained of would not have occurred. It would appear that a mistake cannot be properly chargeable to the Secretary of State in the view of the fact that the report did not disclose all that should be known according to claimant. It would seem that it is incumbent upon the claimant, a large corporation, to understand their requirements, or be properly and legally advised as to an important report of the character of the one in question.

The court has read carefully all the evidence and arguments in this case and are of the opinion that the statutes of the State of Illinois gave claimant at least 30 days after the payment of this money into the Secretary of State’s hands to discover the mistake, and if necessary to enforce the adjustment of the same through the court of general jurisdiction and it further appears to this court that if the claimant pursued the legal remedies otherwise prescribed that an adjustment and determination could have been made in the Secretary of State’s office.

It has been heretofore frequently announced by this court that where a claimant had a legal remedy and failed to follow same that this court would not take jurisdiction.

Therefore it is recommended by this court that said claim be disallowed.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Walk the Tower Trail Loop

Devils Tower National Monument
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# See More Missions

Tumacácori National Historical Park
(No. 1020

Claimant awarded $345.00.)

#### Clyde W. Solomon, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 10, 1927.*

Military *service*— when *award will he made.*When a member of the Illinois National Guard is injured while in active service, and in the line of his duty, he is entitled to an award for the injuries sustained. (Sec. 10, Art. 16, Military & Naval Code, Rev. St. Ill. Chap. 129.)

C. D. Rogers, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The evidence in this case clearly shows that the claimant, Clyde W. Solomon, was injured while in line of duty as a member of the Illinois National Guard, on the 20th day of August, 1924, during encampment. The claimant, while in active service, received a scratch on the knuckle of the third finger of his left hand, arid as a result of this injury the claimant was unable to work for a period of eleven weeks; that while working at his regular vocation he had received $25.00 per week; that he paid out in doctor’s bills the sum of $40.00 and became indebted to certain doctors in the additional sum of $20.00 and for stenographer’s fees for taking testimony in this case the sum of $10.00, a total of $345.00.'

This case comes squarely within the Military and Naval Code, and we believe that inasmuch as the claimant lost full time for eleven weeks and paid out certain sums of money as above stated, that he is entitled to receive the amount in full. We therefore award the claimant the sum of $345.00.
§ 5442.2 Resale of timber from uncompleted contract. ( a ) This section applies to the sale of timber only when 50 percent or more of the timber included in the sale is timber remaining from an uncompleted contract. A bid from a purchaser who held the uncompleted contract, or an affiliate of such purchaser, will be considered only if: ( 1 ) The contract was not canceled because of breach by the purchaser, and
( 2 ) The purchaser has made full payment of the total purchase price and any related charges by the expiration date.
( b ) The purchaser who held the uncompleted contract, or affiliate of such purchaser, shall, upon execution of the resale contract, agree that the Bureau of Land Management shall retain the original payment for timber not removed under the uncompleted contract, less the cost of resale, as a credit toward the purchase price of the resale contract.
[55 FR 17755, Apr. 27, 1990]
#### In the Matter of Beatrice Karchmer, on Behalf of Michael Kane, Appellant, against Samuel Kane, Respondent.

The full faith and credit clause of the Constitution of the United States (art. IV, § 1) does not prevent consideration of the needs of the child and the circumstances of both parents and an award in accordance therewith. *(Halvey*v. *Halvey,*330 U. S. 610; *Estin*v. *Estin,*334 U. S. 541, 545.) The laws of Arkansas (Rev. Stat., eh. 51, § 12; Ark. Stat., 1947, Ann., § 34r-1213) permit its courts to alter the provisions of their decrees of divorce insofar as they deal with alimony and maintenance. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
----

|   | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 7, 2010 | /s/ Gary A. Schuman                                    |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|               |       Gary A. Schuman         |
|               |       Chief Financial Officer |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of InstaCare Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith Berman, Principal Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Keith Berman Keith Berman Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer April 9, 2010
Exhibit 4.452

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182554 dated July 15, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 15, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 23, 2020 No. 172-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   O.А. Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here

Official seal:

MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS

OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE

OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION 
   TECHNOLOGY

AND MASS MEDIA

PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119607
§ 41.220 Admissions. ( a ) Admissions to educational institutions prior to June 24, 1973, are not covered by these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Administratively separate units.* For the purposes only of this section, §§ 41.225 and 41.230, and §§ 41.300 through 41.310, each administratively separate unit shall be deemed to be an educational institution.
( c ) *Application of §§ 41.300 through .310.* Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, §§ 41.300 through 41.310 apply to each recipient. A recipient to which §§ 41.300 through 41.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 41.300 through 41.310.
( d ) *Educational institutions.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section as to recipients that are educational institutions, §§ 41.300 through 41.310 apply only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, graduate higher education, and public institutions of undergraduate higher education.
( e ) *Public institutions of undergraduate higher education.* §§ 41.300 through 41.310 do not apply to any public institution of undergraduate higher education that traditionally and continually from its establishment has had a policy of admitting students of only one sex.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE : T. GERALD TREECE, THE

INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF

THE ESTATE OF JOHN M.

O’QUINN, DECEASED

,

RELATOR

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 114

- C V

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator

, T. Gerald Treece, the Independent Executor of the Estate of John M. O’Quinn,

Deceased, filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the Honorable Francisco X. Dominguez

,

Judge of the 205th District Court of El Paso County, Texas, asking that we order him to transfer a

case to the Probate Court No. 2 of Harris County, Texas. Relator has filed an unopposed motion

to dismiss the mandamus proceeding as moot because the parties have settled their differences and

Respondent has entered a transfer order. We grant the motion and dismiss the mandamus

proceeding as moot.

July 26, 2017

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo, by order of that court of 1 April 2005 in Asociación Nacional de Empresas Forestales v Transformación Agraria S.A (TRAGSA) and Administración del Estado

(Case C-295/05)

(2005/C 257/04)

Language of the case: Spanish

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo, (Supreme Court, Chamber for contentious administrative proceedings) of 1 April 2005, received at the Court Registry on 21 July 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Asociación Nacional de Empresas Forestales (National Association of Forestry Companies) and Transformación Agraria S.A (TRAGSA) and Administración del Estado on the following questions:

----

(1)  Council Directive 93/36/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts (OJ L 199, p. 1).

(2)  Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts (OJ L 199, p. 54).

(3)  European Parliament and Council Directive 97/52/EC of 13 October 1997 amending Directives 92/50/EEC, 93/36/EEC and 93/37/EEC concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, public supply contracts and public works contracts respectively (OJ L 328, p. 1).

(4)  Commission Directive 2001/78/EC of 13 September 2001 amending Annex IV to Council Directive 93/36/EEC, Annexes IV, V and VI to Council Directive 93/37/EEC, Annexes III and IV to Council Directive 92/50/EEC, as amended by Directive 97/52/EC, and Annexes XII to XV, XVII and XVIII to Council Directive 93/38/EEC, as amended by Directive 98/4/EC (Directive on the use of standard forms in the publication of public contract notices) (OJ L 285, p. 1).

(5)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ L 134, p. 114).

(6)  [2003] ECR I–3851.

----