alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsGravity field error analysis: Applications of GPS receivers and gradiometers on low orbiting platformsThe concept of a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver as a tracking facility and a gradiometer as a separate instrument on a low orbiting platform offers a unique tool to map the Earth's gravitational field with unprecedented accuracies. The former technique allows determination of the spacecraft's ephemeris at any epoch to within 3 to 10 cm, the latter permits the measurement of the tensor of second order derivatives of the gravity field to within 0.01 to 0.0001 Eotvos units depending on the type of gradiometer. First, a variety of error sources in gradiometry where emphasis is placed on the rotational problem pursuing as well a static as a dynamic approach is described. Next, an analytical technique is described and applied for an error analysis of gravity field parameters from gradiometer and GPS observation types. Results are discussed for various configurations proposed on Topex/Poseidon, Gravity Probe-B, and Aristoteles, indicating that GPS only solutions may be computed up to degree and order 35, 55, and 85 respectively, whereas a combined GPS/gradiometer experiment on Aristoteles may result in an acceptable solution up to degree and order 240.Document ID19910006297Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSchrama, E.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1990Subject CategoryGeosciences (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-TM-100769REPT-91E00216NAS 1.15:100769Accession Number91N15610Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006297.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
U.S. Geological Survey 

Open-File Report 2005-1176—ONLINE ONLY

# Flooding of the Androscoggin River during December 18-19, 2003, in Canton,Maine

By Robert W. Dudley

 

In cooperation with theFederal Emergency Management Agency

 

This report is available as a pdf.

  ONLINE ONLY

## Abstract 

The Androscoggin River flooded the town of Canton, Maine in December 2003,  resulting in damage to and (or) evacuation of 44 homes. Streamflow records  at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamflow-gaging stations at Rumford  (USGS station identification number 01054500) and Auburn  (01059000) were used to estimate the peak streamflow for the Androscoggin in  the town of Canton for this flood (December 18-19, 2003). The estimated peak  flood streamflow at Canton was approximately 39,800 ft3/s, corresponding to  an estimated recurrence interval of 4.4 years; however, an ice jam downstream  from Canton Point on December 18-19 obstructed river flow resulting in a high-water  elevation commensurate with an open-water flood approximately equal to a 15-year  event. The high water-surface elevations attained during the December 18-19  flood event in Canton were higher than the expected open-water flood water-surface  elevations; this verified the assumptionthat the water-surface elevation was augmented due to the downstream ice jam

The change in slope of the riverbed from upstream of Canton to the impoundment  at the downstream corporate limits, and the river bend near Stevens Island  are principal factors in ice-jam formation near Canton. The    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Ice Jam Database indicates five ice-jam-related    floods (including  December 2003) for the town of Canton: March 13, 1936; January 1978; March  12, 1987; January 29, 1996; and December  18-19, 2003. There have been more ice-jam-related flood events in Canton than  these five documented events, but the exact number and nature of ice jams in  Canton cannot be determinedwithout further research.

 

----

## CONTENTS 

Abstract

Introduction

Flooding of the Androscoggin River during December 18-19,  2003, in Canton, Maine

References Cited

----

To view PDF documents, you must have the **Adobe Acrobat Reader** (free from AdobeSystems)installed on your computer.
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatementsNo. 333-125877 and333-129446 onForms S-8 of ourreports dated May 30, 2006, relating to the financialstatements and financial statement schedule of Premium StandardFarms, Inc. and Subsidiaries, and management’s report oneffectiveness of internal control over financial reportingappearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K ofPremium Standard Farms, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year endedMarch 25, 2006.     DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPKansas City, MissouriMay 30, 2006
#### Leonora McLaughlin, etc., Respondent, v. The McLaughlin Real Estate Company and Others, Appellants.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
INFLIGHT SAFETY 

DO’S AND DON’TS

DO

DON’T

 Breathe. It is important to relax and be aware.

 Stay away from people, animals, and objects.

Improper operation can cause serious injury or 

property damage.

 Be prepared to take manual control of the copter 

at any time.

 Reduce the throttle and switch off the motors if 

you have an unexpected landing.

 Pay attention to undervoltage warnings to 

prevent battery damage.

 Take risks. Safety is your primary responsibility as 

a pilot.

 Fly over viewers or spectators.

 Rely 100% on auto-pilot features.

 Lose visual line of sight with your copter. 

You must be able to see the position and attitude 

at all times.

 Fly in blocked airspace. Know your flight zone 

before taking off.
PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST 

Battery and Power Supplies

 Flight pack battery fully charged and all cells balanced

 RC transmitter battery shows proper voltage

 Auxiliary batteries fully charged and all cells balanced

 Copter batteries and power supplies are securely 

attached

Transmitter/Reciever

 Satellite location and connection is confirmed

 Radio transmitter is turned on before connecting the 

copter battery

 Stick trims at center position

 All auxiliary switches are in the OFF position

 Throttle stick on the transmitter in the down/OFF position

Environment

 There are light to no winds and no precipitation 

 Current solar data has been accounted for (Note: Solar 

flares can affect the geomagnetic field and cause erratic 

behavior with the GPS navigation. Find daily updates 

here: www.n3kl.org/sun/noaa.html)

 Barriers or crowd control in place to protect by-standers
§ 4.827 Depositions. ( a ) A party may take the testimony of any person, including a party, by deposition upon oral examination. This may be done by stipulation or by notice, as set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. On motion of any party or other person upon whom the notice is served, the administrative law judge may for cause shown enlarge or shorten the time for the deposition, change the place of the deposition, limit the scope of the deposition or quash the notice. Depositions of persons other than parties or their representatives shall be upon consent of the deponent.
( b ) ( 1 ) The party will give reasonable notice in writing to every other party of the time and place for taking depositions, the name and address of each person to be examined, if known, or a general description sufficient to identify him or the particular class or group to which he belongs.
( 2 ) The notice to a deponent may be accompanied by a request for the production of documents and tangible things at the taking of the deposition.
( 3 ) A party may name as the deponent a corporation, partnership, association, or governmental agency and may designate a particular person within the organization whose testimony is desired and the matters on which examination is requested. If no particular person is named, the organization shall designate one or more agents to testify on its behalf, and may set forth the matters on which each will testify. The persons so designated shall testify as to matters known or reasonably available to the organization.
( c ) Examination and cross-examination of witnesses may proceed as permitted at the hearing. The witness shall be placed under oath by a disinterested person qualified to administer oaths by the laws of the United States or of the place where the examination is held, and the testimony taken by such person shall be recorded verbatim.
( d ) During the taking of a deposition a party or deponent may request suspension of the deposition on grounds of bad faith in the conduct of the examination, annoyance, embarrassment, oppression of a deponent or party or improper questions propounded. The deposition will then be adjourned. However, the objecting party or deponent must immediately move the administrative law judge for a ruling on his objections to the deposition conduct or proceedings. The administrative law judge may then limit the scope or manner of the taking of the deposition.
( e ) The officer shall certify the deposition and promptly file it with the administrative law judge. Documents or true copies of documents and other items produced for inspection during the examination of the witness shall, upon the request of a party, be marked for identification and annexed to the deposition.
( f ) The party taking the deposition shall give prompt notice of its filing to all other parties.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Annual industrial capabilities report to Congress [electronic resource].**
 
Current
 
2000 | 2002| 2003 | 2004| 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2013| 2014| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
2020
 
SuDoc:D 1.1/16:
ItemNumber:0306-A-39(online)
CGPsystem Number:000580167
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Michael      Yamani                              |          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
| Michael      Yamani                                                                                                                                                                                   |               |
| Secretary/Treasurer      and                                                                                                                                                                               |               |
| Principal      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                           |               |

----
#### § 3862.5 Entry and transfers.
# Trademark basics

Do you have a name or logo you're using to advertise your business? You might have a trademark. Learn how to protect it through the federal registration process.​

## TitleLearning the essentials

                      - What is a trademark?
                      - Trademark, patent, or copyright
                      - Trademark examples
                      - Scope of protection
                      - Strong trademarks
                      - Why register your trademark?
                      - Online trademark tools

## TitleUnderstanding the process

                      - Do I need an attorney?
                      - How long does it take to register?
                      - Checking status
                      - Examination of your application
                      - Approval for publication
                      - Receiving your registration
                      - Maintaining your registration

## TitlePreparing to file

                      - Why search for similar trademarks?
                      - Application requirements
                      - How much does it cost?
                      - Application filing basis
                      - Goods and services
                      - Drawings and specimens
                      - Common problems in applications

Webpage
Learn about responding to office actions 

DIGITAL GUIDE
Trademark Registration Toolkit

IP Identifier
Learn the type of intellectual property you have and how to protect it
§ 48.15 What are the Chairman's responsibilities in submitting proposed amendments to the Secretary? ( a ) Not later than 120 days after the State approves a proposed amendment to the HHCA, the Chairman must submit to the Secretary a clear and complete: ( 1 ) Copy of the proposed amendment;
( 2 ) Description of the nature of the change proposed by the proposed amendment; and,
( 3 ) Opinion explaining whether the proposed amendment requires the approval of Congress.
( b ) The following information must also be submitted: ( 1 ) A description of the proposed amendment, including how the proposed amendment advances the interests of the beneficiaries;
( 2 ) All testimony and correspondence from the Director of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, Hawaiian Homes Commissioners, Homestead Associations, HHCA Beneficiary Associations, and beneficiaries providing views on the proposed amendment;
( 3 ) An analysis of the law and policy of the proposed amendment by the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands and the Hawaiian Homes Commission;
( 4 ) Documentation of the dates and number of hearings held on the measure, and a copy of all testimony provided or submitted at each hearing;
( 5 ) Copies of all committee reports and other legislative history, including prior versions of the proposed amendment;
( 6 ) Final vote totals by the Commission and the legislature on the proposed amendment;
( 7 ) Summaries of all consultations conducted with the beneficiaries regarding the proposed amendment; and
( 8 ) Other additional information that the State believes may assist in the review of the proposed amendment.
§ 1784.4-3 Open meetings. ( a ) All advisory committee and subcommittee meetings and associated field examinations shall be open to the public and news media.
( b ) Anyone may appear before or file a statement with a committee or subcommittee regarding matters on a meeting agenda.
( c ) The scheduling of meetings and the preparation of agendas shall be done in a manner that will encourage and facilitate public attendance and participation. The amount of time scheduled for public presentations and meeting times may be extended when the authorized representative considers it necessary to accommodate all who seek to be heard regarding matters on the agenda.
| SELECTED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND TRACE ELEMENTS IN WATER, BED SEDIMENT, AND AQUATIC ORGANISMS, UPPER SNAKE RIVER BASIN, IDAHO AND WESTERN WYOMING, WATER YEARS 1992-94By Douglas S. OttU.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEYOpen-File Report 97-18**Boise, Idaho                                      1997**

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological SurveyMaintainer: Greg ClarkLast update: 16:16:00 Tue 06 Jun 2000	      Privacy Statement || Disclaimer || AccessibilityURL: http://id.water.usgs.gov/nawqa/reports/ott97/TITLE.html |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6527
JOHN C. ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-96-175-0-17BD) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John C. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advisedAppellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. We accordingly deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent a certificate of appealability is required, we deny that as well. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 30.206 What notice of the summary probate decision will the judge or ADM provide? When the judge or ADM issues a decision in a summary probate proceeding, the judge or ADM must mail or deliver a notice of the decision, together with a copy of the decision, to each affected agency and to each interested party. ( a ) The notice must include a statement that interested parties who are adversely affected have a right to file a request for review with the judge or ADM within 30 days of the mailing date of the decision.
( b ) The decision will become final at the end of the 30-day period, unless a timely request is filed.
§ 49.200 Where are collections deposited? ( a ) A collection from Federal land made pursuant to a permit issued under this part will be deposited in a repository approved to receive the collection.
( b ) The curation of paleontological resources collected from Federal land before September 1, 2022 is governed by the terms and conditions of the original collection permit or agreement, rather than by this part.
( c ) The Federal land manager, in coordination with the permittee and repository staff, will ensure that the specimens in the collection that further paleontological knowledge, public education, or management of paleontological resources are curated in the approved repository. Specimens that do not further paleontological knowledge, public education, or management of paleontological resources may be placed in working collections or disposed of as determined by the Federal land manager in coordination with appropriate subject matter experts.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Christopher A. Marlett, Chief Executive Officer of Integrated Surgical
Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
          September 30, 2009, which this certification accompanies (the
          "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

 Dated: November 10, 2009                         /s/ Christopher A. Marlett
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                     Christopher A. Marlett
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
#### § 4.1150 Who may file.

Any person charged with a civil penalty may file a petition for review of a proposed assessment of that penalty with the Hearings Division, OHA, 801 North Quincy Street, Arlington, Va. 22203.

[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 67 FR 4368, Jan. 30, 2002]
Case 2:20-cv-14144-JEM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 1 of 1
§ 35.9 Answer. ( a ) The defendant may request a hearing by filing an answer with the reviewing official within 30 days of service of the complaint. An answer shall be deemed to be a request for hearing.
( b ) In the answer, the defendant— ( 1 ) Shall admit or deny each of the allegations of liability made in the complaint;
( 2 ) Shall state any defense on which the defendant intends to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why the defendant contends that the penalties and assessments should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Shall state the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by the defendant to act as defendant's representative, if any.
( c ) If the defendant is unable to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section within the time provided, the defendant may, before the expiration of 30 days from service of the complaint, file with the reviewing official a general answer denying liability and requesting a hearing, and a request for an extension of time within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. The reviewing official shall file promptly with the ALJ the complaint, the general answer denying liability, and the request for an extension of time as provided in § 35.11. For good cause shown, the ALJ may grant the defendant up to 30 additional days within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.