alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 


	Number

[ ] 	FORMED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE	[ ] Common Units 


 


 


MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE HOLDINGS, LLC


 


CUSIP [ ]

  


Total Authorized Issue





500,000,000 Common Units


 


This is to Certify that ___________________
is the owner of


___________________________ Common Units representing
limited liability company interests of the above Company transferable only on the books of the Company by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. Each unit evidenced by this Certificate represents
one limited liability company interest in the Company. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meanings given them
in the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Company, as amended from time to time (the “Agreement”).
Each Common Unit has such relative rights and obligations as set forth in the Agreement. The Unitholder, by accepting this Certificate,
is deemed to have requested admission as, and agreed to become, a Unitholder and to have agreed to and be bound by each provision of the
Agreement. THE COMMON UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON AND TRANSFER CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT.
The Company will furnish without charge to each Unitholder who so requests, the powers, designations, preferences and relative participating,
optional or other special rights of each class of Units or series thereof of Units and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions
of such preferences and/or rights. This Certificate shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware
without regard to principles of conflicts of laws thereof.


 


Witness, the seal of the Company and the signatures
of its duly authorized officers.


 


Dated


 


	 	 	 
	Christopher Frost, Chief Executive Officer	 	Michael Kernan, Secretary
§ 4.333 Service of notice of appeal. ( a ) On or before the date of filing of the notice of appeal the appellant shall serve a copy of the notice upon each known interested party, upon the official of the Bureau of Indian Affairs from whose decision the appeal is taken, and upon the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. The notice of appeal filed with the Board shall certify that service was made as required by this section and shall show the names and addresses of all parties served. If the appellant is an Indian or an Indian tribe not represented by counsel, the appellant may request the official of the Bureau whose decision is appealed to assist in service of copies of the notice of appeal and any supporting documents.
( b ) The notice of appeal will be considered to have been served upon the date of personal service or mailing or electronic transmission in accordance with § 4.310(f).
[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 88 FR 5793, Jan. 30, 2023]
ENCLOSURE 2

CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ACTIVITIES

As required by 40 CFR 51.102(a), a public comment period to provide the opportunity 

to submit written comments concerning a proposed revision to the Commonwealth of 

Virginia State Implementation Plan was held from June 4 to July 5, 2012.

As required by 40 CFR Part 51.102(a) and (d)(1) and (2), the public was given notice of 

the public comment period in the Virginia Register, along with the location of the 

proposal for public inspection, on June 4, 2012. The notice included procedures to 

afford the public the opportunity to request that a hearing be held pursuant to 40 CFR 

51.102(a); no such request was received. The attached copy of the notice provides the 

evidence required by Section 2.1(f) of Appendix V of 40 CFR Part 51. 

The Regional Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was notified 

of the public comment period, as was each local air pollution control agency which will 

be significantly affected by the revision and is located in the affected Air Quality Control 

Regions. In addition, the District of Columbia, Maryland and Tennessee, which share 

affected interstate Air Quality Control Regions with Virginia, were notified of the public 

comment period. These notifications follow the requirements of 40 CFR Part 

51.102(d)(3), (4) and (5).

TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REG02-PH

SIPASSESSMENT\HS-SIP-2.DOC
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Engine Manufactures Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Engine Manufacturers 
Association (``EMA'') has filed notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Engine 
Manufacturers Association, Chicago, IL. The nature and scope of EMA's 
standards development activities are: To develop, establish and 
coordinate voluntary consensus standards applicable to engine fluids, 
which include lubricants, fuels and coolants. As a part of its 
standards setting activities, EMA develops performance criteria, 
consensus positions, recommended guidelines and performance 
specifications in order to adopt consensus positions on engine fluid 
issues of concern to the industry as a whole.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-22896 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 3400.3-1 Consent or conditions of surface management agency.

Leases for land, the surface of which is under the jurisdiction of any Federal agency other than the Department of the Interior, may be issued only with the consent of the head or other appropriate official of the other agency having jurisdiction over the lands containing the coal deposits, and subject to such conditions as that officer may prescribe to insure the use and protection of the lands for the primary purpose for which they were acquired or are being administered.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the annual  report of Megola Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year  ending  July 31,  2005,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Joel Gardner,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Joel Gardner
------------------------
Joel Gardner
Chief Executive Officer

October 28, 2005
FIRST SHENANGO BANCORP, INC.
                                   EXHIBIT 11

          Statement Regarding Computation of Primary Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                              Three Months Ended                 Nine Months Ended
                                                                September 30,                      September 30,
                                                           -------------------------      ---------------------------
                                                             1996             1995            1996            1995
                                                           ---------     -----------      -----------      ----------

<S>                                                       <C>            <C>              <C>             <C>      
Weighted average common shares issued                      2,343,098      2,343,098        2,343,098       2,343,098
Net effect of dilutive stock options                          73,918         78,438           66,852          64,776
Average unallocated ESOP shares                              (74,850)       (89,039)         (74,910)        (89,039)
Average MSBP shares in plan reserve                          (10,367)        (9,012)          (9,793)         (9,012)
Weighted average treasury shares                             (70,504)       (28,790)         (50,468)        (23,691)
                                                           ---------      ---------        ---------       ---------
Weighted average shares and common stock
equivalents outstanding                                    2,261,295      2,294,695        2,274,779       2,286,132
                                                           =========      =========        =========       =========
Net earnings                                              $   10,270     $  840,361       $1,857,524      $2,275,173
                                                           =========      =========        =========       =========
Per share amount                                               $0.00          $0.37            $0.82           $1.00
                                                           =========      =========        =========       =========

</TABLE>

Earnings  per share have been  computed  based on the  treasury  stock method in
using  average  market  price for the  common  stock  equivalents.  The  Company
accounts for the shares  acquired by the Employee Stock  Ownership Plan ("ESOP")
in accordance with Statement of Position 93-6; shares controlled by the ESOP are
not considered in the weighted average shares  outstanding  until the shares are
committed for allocation.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Whiskeytown
National Recreation AreaCalifornia
§ 4.1045 What are the requirements for exhibits, official notice, and stipulations? ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, any material offered in evidence, other than oral testimony, must be offered in the form of an exhibit.
( 2 ) Each exhibit offered by a party must be marked for identification.
( 3 ) Any party who seeks to have an exhibit admitted into evidence must provide: ( i ) The original of the exhibit to the reporter, unless the ALJ permits the substitution of a copy; and
( ii ) A copy of the exhibit to the ALJ.
( b ) *ALJ exhibits.* ( 1 ) At any time prior to issuance of the recommended decision, the ALJ, on his or her own initiative, may admit into evidence as an exhibit any document from the administrative record reviewed by OFA.
( 2 ) If the ALJ admits a document under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the ALJ must notify the parties and give them a brief opportunity to submit comments on the document.
( c ) *Material not offered.* If a document offered as an exhibit contains material not offered as evidence: ( 1 ) The party offering the exhibit must: ( i ) Designate the matter offered as evidence;
( ii ) Segregate and exclude the material not offered in evidence, to the extent feasible; and
( iii ) Provide copies of the entire document to the other parties appearing at the hearing.
( 2 ) The ALJ must give the other parties an opportunity to inspect the entire document and offer in evidence any other portions of the document.
( d ) *Official notice.* ( 1 ) At the request of any party at the hearing, the ALJ may take official notice of any matter of which the courts of the United States may take judicial notice, including the public records of the Department, except materials in the administrative record reviewed by OFA.
( 2 ) The ALJ must give the other parties appearing at the hearing an opportunity to show the contrary of an officially noticed fact.
( 3 ) Any party requesting official notice of a fact after the conclusion of the hearing must show good cause for its failure to request official notice during the hearing.
( e ) *Stipulations.* ( 1 ) The parties may stipulate to any relevant facts or to the authenticity of any relevant documents.
( 2 ) If received in evidence at the hearing, a stipulation is binding on the stipulating parties.
( 3 ) A stipulation may be written or made orally at the hearing.
FILED

December 3, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

BILLY FLOWERS )

and AMY FLOWERS, ) HICKMAN CHANCERY

)

Plaintiffs/Appellants ) NO. 01A01-9806-CH-00315 and

) NO. 01A01-9806-CH-00286

v. ) (consolidated cases)

)

CHARLES R. HORNER and ) DONALD P. HARRIS,

REBA M. HORNER, ) CHANCELLOR

)

Defendants/Appellees ) AFFIRMED

Douglas Thompson Bates, Centerville, for Appellants.

Allston Vander Horst, Centerville, for Appellees.

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

INMAN, Senior Judge

This controversy may, perhaps, be described as a boundary dispute.

The development of Riverview Estates Subdivision began in 1971 with the

recordation of a plat which provided for a cul-de-sac fifty feet in width centered

on the West boundary of Lot 23.

The physical location of the cul-de-sac was moved about 183 feet

westwardly sometime between 1971 and 1974, and the description of Lot 23 was

enlarged by the inclusion of a strip 30 feet wide and 133 feet long. The recorded

plat was not amended to reflect the relocated cul-de-sac.

Lot 23 was acquired by the plaintiffs in 1995 following three mesne

conveyances each of which references “Lot 23, Riverview Estates Subdivision,

Section D, as surveyed by Lonnie Gilliam, Dec. 29, 1971,” but each conveyance

included the 30 X 133 tract.
1

Affirm ance W ithout O pinion - M emor andum Opinio n. (b) The Court, w ith the con currenc e of all

judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum

opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum

opinion it shall be designated “MEMORA NDUM OPINION ,” shall not be published, and shall not be cited or

relied on fo r any reas on in a su bseque nt unrelate d case. [A s amen ded by order filed April 22 , 1992.]

2

The plaintiffs insist that the location of the cul-de-sac is fixed by the

recorded plat, and not by the metes and bounds description in her and his

predecessors’ deeds.

The defendants own Lot 22, and they insist that the metes and bounds

descriptions control, superimposed upon the significant physical location of the

cul-de-sac, plain for all to see.

The trial judge agreed with the defendants, holding that the plaintiffs failed

to prove that they relied on the recorded plat in any way in purchasing Lot 23.

This case is peculiarly one for affirmance pursuant to Rule 10, Rules of the

Court of Appeals.1

The judgment is affirmed at the costs of the appellants.

_______________________________

William H. Inman, Senior Judge

CONCUR:

_______________________________

Houston M. Goddard, Presiding Judge

_______________________________

Herschel P. Franks, Judge
#### St. Louis Union Trust Company, as Trustee under the Will of Charles Stoffregen, Deceased, v. Carl H. Stoffregen et al.

Present—. Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Trip Idea

# Moderate Hikes at Lake Mead National Recreation Area

## Moderate Hikes

Sort By:RelevanceRecently UpdatedDate ReleasedTitle

Show1040 per page

lake mohave moderate hikeslake mead moderate hikes

Last updated: November 21, 2023

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,335.91

 2,335.54

 2,335.20

 2,334.86

 2,334.50

 2,334.15

 2,333.82

 2,333.48

 2,333.12

 2,332.79

 2,332.45

 2,332.11

 2,331.79

 2,331.45

 2,331.11

 2,330.75

 2,330.40

 2,330.06

 2,329.75

 2,329.48

 2,329.15

 2,328.84

 2,328.54

 2,328.25

 2,327.97

 2,327.70

 2,327.42

 2,327.14

 2,326.87

 2,326.62

 1,927.9

 1,922.7

 1,917.9

 1,913.1

 1,908.0

 1,903.1

 1,898.5

 1,893.7

 1,888.7

 1,884.1

 1,879.4

 1,874.7

 1,870.2

 1,865.5

 1,860.8

 1,855.9

 1,851.1

 1,846.4

 1,842.1

 1,838.4

 1,833.9

 1,829.7

 1,825.6

 1,821.7

 1,817.8

 1,814.2

 1,810.4

 1,806.6

 1,802.9

 1,799.6

STORAGE

-6.0

-5.2

-4.8

-4.8

-5.1

-4.9

-4.6

-4.8

-5.0

-4.6

-4.7

-4.7

-4.4

-4.7

-4.7

-5.0

-4.8

-4.7

-4.2

-3.7

-4.5

-4.2

-4.1

-4.0

-3.8

-3.7

-3.8

-3.8

-3.7

-3.4

CHANGE

15

134

229

262

108

94

173

122

-42

-52

231

203

291

107

110

66

48

153

90

-166

37

12

83

101

49

234

200

42

88

104

INFLOW

 2,900

 2,648

 2,570

 2,565

 2,546

 2,461

 2,392

 2,410

 2,391

 2,191

 2,531

 2,495

 2,435

 2,388

 2,391

 2,453

 2,414

 2,389

 2,118

 1,515

 1,913

 2,086

 2,055

 2,013

 1,891

 2,008

 2,047

 1,873

 1,851

 1,723

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 138

 297

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 117

 120

 79

 112

 112

 111

 111

 107

 103

 74

 82

 90

 90

 89

 89

 113

 61

 121

 113

 44

 104

 60

 88

 80

 80

 72

 68

 84

 80

 83

C.F.S.

 .28

 .29

 .19

 .27

 .27

 .27

 .27

 .26

 .25

 .18

 .20

 .22

 .22

 .22

 .22

 .28

 .15

 .30

 .28

 .11

 .26

 .15

 .22

 .20

 .20

 .18

 .17

 .21

 .20

 .21

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 10, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -134.4 3,126 67,663 0 435 2,737 6.73 .00

ACRE-FEET -134,400 6,200 134,210 0 863 5,429

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 134,210

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 863

 135,073

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2012 .35

 1,933.9

Table 4

(1) (1)
### [§935. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–514, title XII, §1272(d)(2), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2594]

Section, added Pub. L. 92–606, §1(a), Oct. 31, 1972, 86 Stat. 1494; amended Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §908(c)(4), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1656, related to coordination of United States and Guam individual income taxes.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Amendment Subsequent to Repeal

Pub. L. 108–357, title IX, §908(c)(4), (d), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1656, 1657, applicable to taxable years ending after Oct. 22, 2004, amended section, as in effect before the effective date of its repeal, in introductory provisions of subsec. (a), by substituting "who, during the entire taxable year" for "for the taxable year who", in subsecs. (a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), by inserting "bona fide" before "resident", in subsec. (b)(1)(A), by inserting "(other a bona fide resident of Guam during the entire taxable year)" after "United States", and, in subsection (b)(2), by striking out "residence and" before "citizenship".

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1986, with certain exceptions and qualifications, see section 1277 of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as an Effective Date of 1986 Amendment note under section 931 of this title.
#### Shirley Dennis, an Infant, by Ernest C. Dennis, her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Pasquale Cioppa et al., Respondents. Ernest C. Dennis, Appellant, v. Pasquale Cioppa et al., Respondents.

All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in each of the automobile negligence actions.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ. [See *post,*p. 889.]