July 30, 2015

Exemption No. 12235 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

- 1926

Mr. Bob Kaufman

Alaska Channel 507 East Street, Suite 206 Anchorage, AK 99501

Dear Mr. Kaufman :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

By letter dated May 12, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Alaska Channel ( hereinafter petitioner or operator ) for an exemption . The pet itioner requested to operate an unmanned ai rcraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial cinematography, photography, and monitoring

.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA des cribing the proposed operations and

the regulations that the petitioner s eeks an exemption

.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner is a DJI S800 EVO

.

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, C ertification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates

. In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of P ublic Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U

. S

. C

. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the2

aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft

meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from

14 CFR part 21

, C ertification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificate s , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection

. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption No s

. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

− 20 14

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Lab s , Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the peti tioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public i nterest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 ;

• The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and

• A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, Alaska Channel is granted an exempti on from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection

. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Alaska Channel is hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.3

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI S800 EVO when weighing less than 55 pounds inc luding payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption

.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming are

not permitted.

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate or

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maint ains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times ;

e lectronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation fo r the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in thi s grant of exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and

limita tions in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The ope rator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The operator must also present up dated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then4

the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FA A’s UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS op eration or flight characteristics, e.g.

, replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and mu st remain at

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it i s in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre

- flight inspection and determine the UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g.

, inoperable comp onents, items, or equipment. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of Col u mbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government. The PIC must also meet the flight revi ew requirements specified in

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and

main taining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs (trai ni ng, proficiency, and experience

- building) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However,5

training operat ions may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During

traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport sy mbo l as denoted on the current

FAA

- published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management mus t be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS sign al, the UA must return to a

pre

- determined location within the pr ivate or controlled

- access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibi ted from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All operations shall be cond ucted in accordance with an ATO

- issued COA. The exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to co nduct operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA

.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N− Number) ma rkings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating.6

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and

activities at all times.

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonpartici pating persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons r emain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety of nonparticipating persons ; and

b. The owner/ controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard

.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or control led

- access property with permission from the property owner/controller or aut horized representative. Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the opera tional area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported

to the FA A's UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a mot ion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the a rea of proposed filming. The 3

- day7

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of th e person responsible for the on

- scene operation of the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N− Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certific ate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those who gave permission must be made available t o the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes

essenti al to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specifie d in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to,

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service

EnclosuresMay 1 2 ,	2015

U.S.	Department	of Transportation Docket	Management	System 1200	New	Jersey	Ave.,	SE Washington,	DC	20590

Dear	Sir	or	Madam:

Attached	please	find	Alaska	Channel 's	request	for	an	exemption	from	the	listed Federal	Aviation	Regulations to	allow	commercial	operation	of	its	Small	Unmanned Aircraft	Systems	("sUASs")	for aerial cinematography,	real	estate	photography, and monitoring	o f	secured	and	controlled	environments	with	respect	to	construction sites,	transmission	towers,	other similar industrial	elevated	structures.	This exemption	request	is	exclusively	for	the	use of the	DJI	S800	EVO (reserved	N

Number	N4949) to be	used	by Alaska	Channel

.

In	addition	to	having	years	of	experience	flying	sUASs, I	hold	a	private	pilot

certificate	and	a	current	medical.	I	have over	600	hours	of	flight	time	as	a	private pilot,	and	take	recurrent	instruction.	I	have	also	received	instruction	in	a	manned helicopter.	As	a	result,	I	understand	the	responsibilities	undertaken	when	operating as	pilot	in	command	of	any	aerial	vehicle	an d	will	ensure	that	any	sUAS	operated	by Alaska	Channel	will	abide	by	all	necessary	safety	and	regulatory	requirements.

Please	be	advised	that	this	exemption	request	being	submitted	by Alaska	Channel is extremely	similar	in	nature	to	the	exemption	submit ted	to	the	FAA	by	Clayco,	Inc. For	purposes	of expediting	the	exemption	process, Alaska	Channel is	agreeable	to abide	by	and	accept	the	Conditions	and	Limitations	stipulated	in	Clayco,	Inc, Trudeau,	and	other	recent	approvals.	Grant	of	Exemption	Nos.	11109 &	11138.

Thank	you	for	your	time	and	consideration,	and	please	let	me	know	if	you	have	any questions.

Sincerely,

President	&	Founder Alaska	ChannelMay	12,	2015

U.S .	Department	of	Transportation

D ocket	Management	System 1200	New	Jersey	Ave.,	SE Washington,	DC	20590

Re:	Exemption	Request	Section	333 of	t he	FAA	Reform	Act	and	Part	11 of	t he Federal	Aviation	Regulations	from	14	C.P.R.	45.23(b );	14	CFR	Part21;	14	CFR	61.113 (a)	&	(b);	91.7	(a);	91.9	(b)	(2);	91.103(b);	91.109;	91.119;	91.121;	91.151(a); 91.203(a)	&(b);	91.405	(a);	91.407(a)	(1);	91.409	(a)	(2);	91.417	(a)	&	(b).

Dear	Sir	or	Madam:

Pursuant	to	Section	333	of	the	FAA	Moderniz ation	and	Reform	Act	of 2012	(the Reform	Act)	and	14	C.P.R.	Part	11, Alaska	Channel (" Alaska	Channel "),	a n imagery and	inspection	firm,	hereby	applies	for	an	exemption	from	the	listed	Federal Aviation	Regulations	("FARs")	to	allow	commercial	operation	of	i ts	Small	Unmanned Aircraft	Systems	("sUASs")	for	aerial	imaging	for cinematography and	aerial inspection and monitoring	of	secured	and	controlled	environment s,	such	as

construction	sites or	other	elevated	industrial	structures, so	long	as	such	operations

a re	conducted	within	and	under	the	conditions	outlined	herein	or	as	may	be established	by	the	FAA	as required	by	Section	333.

As	detailed	in	this	document,	the	requested	exemption	would	permit	the	operation of	sUAS	under	controlled	conditions	in	airspace that	is	1)	limited	2)	predetermined 3)	controlled	as	to	access	and	4)	would	provide	for	safer videography	and inspec tions	thus	preventing	the	use	o f	conventional	aircraft	over these sites	and eliminates	the	need	to	place	personnel	in	harm ’ s	way	when	attemp ting	to	access

sites	or elevated	structures	without	conventional	access.	Approval of	t his	exemption would	thereby	enhance	safety	and	fulfill	the	Secretary	of	Transportation's	(the	FAA Administrator's)	responsibilities	to"...establish	requirements	for	the	s afe	operation

of such	aircraft	systems	in	the	national	airspace	system."	Section	333(c) of	t he

Reform	Act.

The	name	and	address	of	the	applicant	is:

Alaska	Channel c/	Bob	Kaufman 507	E	Street,	Suite	206 Anchorage,	AK	99501

Phone: 907

- 350

- 9127Regulat ions	from	which	the	exemption	is requ ested:	14	C.P.R.	Part21	14 C.F.R.45.23(b)	14C.F.R.	61.113	(a)	&(b)	14	C.P.R.	91.7	(a)	14	C.P.R.	91.9	(b)(2)	14

C.P.R.	91.103	14	C.P.R.	91.109 14	C.P.R.	91.119	14	C.P.R.	91.121	14	C.P.R.	91.151	(a) 14	C.P.R.	91.203	(a)	&	(b)	14	C.P.R.	91.405	(a)	14	C.P.R. 407	(a)	(1)	14	C.P.R.	409 (a)(2)	14	C.P.R.	417	(a)	&	(b)

I. STATUTORY	AUTHORITY	FOR	EXEMPTIONS The	Federal	Aviation	Act	expressly	grants	the	FAA	authority	to	issue	exemptions. This	statutory	authority	includes	exempting	civil	aircraft,	as	the	term	is	de fined under	§40	101	of	the	Act,	including	sUASs,	from	the	requirement	that	all	civil

aircraft	must	have	a	current	airworthiness	certificate.

The	Administrator	may	grant	an	exemption	from	a	requirement	of	a	regulation prescribed	under	subsection	(a)	or	(b ) of	t his	section	or	any	sections	44702

- 44716

of	t his	title	if	the	Administrator	finds	the	exemption	in	the	public	interest.	49	U.S.C. §4470	1(f)	See	also	49	USC	§4471	1(a);	49	USC	§44704;	14	CFR	§91.203(a)	(1).

Section	333(b)	of	the	Reform	Act	assists	t he	Secretary	in	determining whether sUASs	may	operate	in	the	National	Airspace	System	(NAS)	without	creating	a	hazard to	the	user,	the	public,	or	a	threat	to	national	security.	In	making	this	determination, the	Secretary	must	consider:

• The	sUAS's	size,	we ight,	speed ,	and	operational	capability;

• Whether	the	sUAS	operates	within	the	visual line	of	sight	of	the	operator

• Whether	the	sUAS	operates	outside	of	highly	populated	areas	and	away	from close	proximity	to airports.

Reform	Act	§333(a).	If the	Secretar y	determines	that	a	sUAS	"may	operate	safely	in the	national	airspace	system	(NAS),	the	Secretary	shall	establish	requirements	for the	safe	operation	of	such	aircraft	in	the	national	airspace	system."	Id.	§333(c).

Alaska	Channel 's	sUASs	are	multirotor	ve hicles,	weighting	25	or	fewer	lbs.	including payload.	They	operate	under	normal	conditions	at	a	speed	of	no	more	than 40 knots and	have	the	capability	to	hover,	and	move	in	the	vertical	and	horizontal	plane simultaneously.	The	sUASs	will	operate	only	in	th e	pilot's	visual	line	of	sight	at	all times	and	will	operate	only	within	sterile	area s. Such	operations	will	insure	that	the sUASs	will	"not	create	a	hazard	to	users	of	the	national	airspace	system	or	the public."	Reform	Act	Section	333	(b).

Given	the	sm all	size of	t he	sUASs	involved	and	the	restricted	and	sterile environment	within	which	they	will	operate,	our	application	falls	squarely	within the	zone	of	safety	(an	equivalent	level	of	safety)	in	which	Congress	envisioned	that the	FAA	must,	by	exemption, allow	commercial	operations	of	sUASs	to	commence immediately. Also	due	to	the	small	size of	t he	UASs,	the	low	altitudes,	and	restricted areas	in	which	our	sUASs	will	operate,	approval of	t he	application	does	not	present a	national	security	issue.Given the	clear	direction	in	Section	333 of	t he	Reform	Act,	the	authority	contained	in the	Federal	Aviation	Act,	as	amended;	the	strong	equivalent	level	of	safety surrounding	the	proposed	operations,	and	the	significant	public	benefit,	including enhanced	safety ,	the	grant	of	the	requested	exemptions	is	in	the	public	interest. Accordingly, Alaska	Channel respectfully	requests	that	the	FAA	grant	the	requested exemption	without	delay.

II.	PUBLIC	INTEREST

This	exemption	application	is	expressly	submitted	to	fulf ill	Congress'	goal	in	passing Section	333(a)	through	(c) of	t he	Reform	Act.	This	law	directs	the	Secretary	of Transportation	to	consider	whether	certain	unmanned	aircraft	systems	may operate	safely	in	the	NAS	before	completion of	t he	rulemaking	required	un der

Section	332 of	t he	Reform	Act.	By	granting	an	exemption	the	FAA	will	fulfill Congress's	intent of	a llowing	sUAS	to	operate	utilizing	significant	safety	precautions

in	low	risk	environments.

The	use	of	sUASs to	inspect	and	monitor elevated	structures and	towers	can significantly	reduce	the	risk	to	workers	of	falls	while	inspecting,	surveying,	or monitoring	such	structures.	sUASs	can	inspect,	photograph,	and	collect	data	on	hard to	get	to	areas	that	otherwise	would	require	dangerous	worker	inspections. Historically,	falls	are	the	1	leading	source	of workplace	fatality	a nd	injury	on

construction	sites ,	and	reducing	falls	through	sUAS	use	for	site	imaging	could	save

workers ’ lives.	Additionally,	sUASs	could	replace	the	use	of	helicopters	and	small

aircraft to	monitor	sites.	The	sUASs	we	propose	to	fly	in	this	application	is	under

twenty

- five	(25)	pounds,	and	carries	no	combustible	material	on	board,	as	opposed to	the	much	larger	conventionally	powered	small	aircraft.	Shifting	to	sUASs	from helicopters	prese nts	a	marked	safety	increase	for	our	workers	and	the	public.	·

The	use	of	sUASs	to	acquire	aerial	cinematography	for	use	in	filmmaking	and	real estate	visualizations	has	similar	safety	benefits,	as	well	as	educational	benefits.	It will	allow	the	general public	to	gain	a	much	better	understanding	of	the	physical layout	as	seen	from	low	altitudes.	It	is	far	safter	to	operate	an	sUAS	in	such	settings than	a	manned	helicopter	or	a	fixed	wing	aircraft.

Lastly,	sUASs	reduce	the	environmental	impact	by	dramati cally	decreasing	the energy	used	for	aerial	imaging	and	data	collection	over	a	construction	site 1 .	Our sUASs	use	rechargeable	lithium	ion	batteries,	as	opposed	to	fossil	fuels	burned	in operation	of	small	aircraft	that	are	many	hundreds	of times	heavier.

1 Commonly	Used	Statistics",	Occupational	Safety	&Health	Administration.	AvailableIII.	EQUIV ALENT	LEVEL	OF	SAFETY

Alaska	Channel proposes	that	the	exemption	requested	herein	apply	to	civil	aircraft that	have	the	characteristics	and	that	operate	with	the	limitations	listed	herein. These	limitations	provide	for	at	least	an	equivalent, or	even	higher,	level	of	safety	to operations	under	the	current	regulatory	structure	because	the	proposed	operations represent	a	safety	enhancement	to	the	already	safe	protocols	followed	on	industrial sites	and	imaging	operations	conducted	with	helicopters and	other	conventional

aircraft.

Alaska	Channel will	be	bound	by	the	following	limitations	when	conducting	its	sUAS operations	under	an	FAA	issued	exemption:

1. The	sUAS	will	be	less	than	25	pounds.

2. Flights	will	be	operated	within visual	l ine of	sight	of a	pilot.

3. Maximum	total	flight	time	for	each	operational	flight	will	be	30	minutes.	The UAS	calculates	battery	reserve	in	real	time,	and	will	return	to	its	ground station	with	at	least	20%	battery	power	reserve	should	that	occur	prior	to

the	30	minute	lim it.

4. Flights	will	be	operated	at	an	altitude	never	exceeding 400 feet	AGL.

5. Flight	Crew	for	each	operation	will	consist	of	the	sUAS	pilot	who	will	keep the	sUAS	within	his	visual	line	of	sight	at	all	times,	and	a	Visual	Observer	to assist	the	pilot.

6. The	s UAS	pilot	and	the	Visual	Observer	will	be	trained	in	flight,	operations, and	safety	procedures

. 7. The	sUAS	will	only	operate	within	a	confined	"Sterile	Area

. " We	will	also

establish a	"Security	Perimeter"	for	the	flight	operations	area.

8. A	briefing	will	be conducted	in	regard	to	the	planned	sUAS	operati on s	prior to	each	day's	flight	activities.	It	will	be	mandatory	that	all	personnel	who	will be	performing	duties	within	the	boundaries	of	the	safety	perimeter	be present	for	this	briefing.

9. All	onsite	personn el	will	consent	to	the	UAS	flyover	on	site	by	waiver,	and	the pilot	will	obtain	additional	verbal	or	written	consent	of	all	persons	who	will

be	allowed	within	100	fee t of	t he	flight	operation.

10. Written	and/or	oral	permission	from	the	relevant	propert y	hold ers	will	be

obtained.

11. All	required	permissions	and	permits	will	be	obtained	from	territorial,	state, county	or	city	jurisdictions,	including	local	law	enforcement,	fire,	or	other

approp riate	governmental	agencies.

12. If the	sUAS	loses	communications	or	lose s	its	GPS	signal,	it	will	have capability	to	return	to	a	pre

- determined	location	within	the	Security

Perimeter	and	land.

13. T he	sUAS	will	have	the	capability	to,	and	the	pilot	will	initiate	a,	flight	abort in	case	of	unpredicted	obstacles	or	emergencies.IV.	DESCRIPTION	OF	SPECIFIC REGULATIONS

14 CFR Part	21, Subpart	H:	Airworthiness	Certificates	14C.F.R.	§91.203(a)(l)

Subpart	H,	entitled	Airworthiness	Certificates,	establishes	the	procedural requirements	for	the	issuance of	a irworthiness	certificates as	required	by	FAR §91.203	(a)	(1).	Given	the	size	and	limited	operating	area	associated	with	the aircraft	to	be	utilized	by	the Alaska	Channel ,	an	exemption	from	Part	21	Subpart H	meets	the	requirements	of	an	equivalent	level	of	safety	under	Part	11	and

S ection	333	of	the	Reform	Act.	The	Federal	Aviation	Act	(49	U.S.C.§44701	(f))

and	Section	333 of	t he	Reform	Act	both	authorize	the	FAA	to	exempt	aircraft from	the	requirement	for	an	airworthiness	certificate,	upon	consideration	of	the size,	weight,	speed,	o perational	capability,	and	proximity	to	airports	and populated	areas	of the	particular	UAS. Alaska	Channel 's	sUAS	will	be	operated	at low	speed	in	a	controlled	environment,	at	least	five	miles	from	an	airport	and more	than	three	miles	from	any	city	or	dens ely	populated	area.	An	analysis	of these	criteria	demonstrates	that	the	UAS	operated	without	an	airworthiness certificate,	in	the	restricted	environment	and	under	the	conditions	proposed	will be	at	least	as	safe,	or	safer,	than	a	conventional	aircraft	(fix ed	wing	or	helicopter) operating	with	an	airworthiness	certificate	without	the	restrictions

and conditions	proposed.

The	sUAS	to	be	operated	hereunder	is	less	than	25	lbs.	fully	loaded,	carries neither	a	pilot	nor	passenger,	carries	no	explosive	materia ls	or	flammable	liquid fuels,	and	operates	exclusively	within	a	secured	area

. Like	other	civil	aircraft, operations	under	this	exemption	will	be	tightly	controlled	and	monitored	by	the pilot,	and	under	the	requirements,	and	in	compliance	with,	local	public safety requirements,	to	obtain	aerial	imagery

. The	FAA	will	have	advance	notice of	a ll operations.

These	safety	enhancements,	which	already	apply	to	civil	aircraft	operated	in

connection	with similar sites,	provide	a	greater	degree	of	safety	to	the	publ ic	and property	owners	than	conventional	operations	conducted	with	airworthiness certificates	issued	under	14	C.P.R.	Part	21,	Subpart	H.

Lastly,	application of	t hese	same	criteria	demonstrates	that	there	is	no	credible threat	to	national	security	posed	b y	the	UAS,	due	to	its	size,	speed	of	operation, location	of	operation,	lack	of	explosive	materials	or	flammable	liquid	fuels,	and ability	to	carry	an	external	load	no	greater	than	seven	(7)	lbs.

14	C.F.R.	45.23(b):	Marking	of	the	Aircraft

This	regulati on	requires	certain	experimental,	provisionally	certificated	aircraft, or	light

- sport	category	aircraft	to	be	marked	with	letters	between	2	inches	and	6 inches	high	"limited,"	"restricted,"	"light

- sport,"	"experimental,"	or	"provisional,"

near	each	entran ce	to	a	cabin,	cockpit,	or	pilot	station.Even	though	the	UAS	will	have	no	airworthiness	certificate,	an	exemption	will	be needed	as	the	UAS	will	have	no	entrance	to	the	cabin,	cockpit	or	pilot	station	on which	the	word	"Experimental"	can	be	placed.	Give n	the	size of	t he	sUAS,	two

inch	lettering	will	be	impossible.	The	word	"Experimental"	will	be	placed	on	the fuselage	in	compliance	with	§45.29	(f).

The	equivalent	level	of	safety	will	be	provided	by	having	the	sUAS	marked	on	its fuselage	as	required	by §45.29	(f)	where	the	pilot,	observer	and	others	working

with	the	sUAS	will	see	the	identification of	t he	UAS	as	"Experimental."	The	FAA has	issued	the	following	exemptions	to	this	regulation:	Exemptions	Nos.	10700, 873	8,	10167	and	10167A.	14	CFR	61.113	(a )	&	(b):	Private	pilot	privileges	and

limitations:	Pilot	in	command

Sections	61.113	(a)	&	(b)	limit	private	pilots	to	non

- commercial	operations. Because	the	UAS	will	not	carry	a	pilot	or	passengers,	the	proposed	operations can	achieve	the	equivalent	leve l	of	safety	of	current	operations	by	requiring	the pilot	operating	the	aircraft	to	have	completed	a	UAS	flight	training	course	and

have	accumulated	at least	twenty

- five	(25)	hours	o f	total	time	as	a	UAS	pilot, with	at	least	ten	(10)	hours	logged	as	a	UAS	p ilot	with	similar	UAS	type,	before flying	a	UAS	for Alaska	Channel in	commercial	operations.	Unlike	a	conventional aircraft	that	carries	the	pilot	and	passengers,	the	sUAS	is	remotely	controlled with	no	living	thing	or	cargo	on	board.	The	area	of	operation is	controlled	and restricted,	and	all	flights	are	planned	and	coordinated	in	advance

. The	risks associated	with	the	operation of	t he	sUAS	are	so	diminished	from	the	level	of risk	associated	with	commercial	operations	contemplated	by	Part	61	when drafted, that	allowing	operations	of	the	sUAS	as	requested	with	a	pilot	who	has met	the	minimum	requirements	exceeds	the	present	level	of	safety	achieved	by 14	C.P.R.	§61.113	(a)	&	(b).

14	C.F.R.	91.7	(a):	Civil	aircraft	airworthiness

The	regulation	requires	t hat	no	person	may	operate	a	civil	aircraft	unless	it	is	in airworthy	condition.	As	there	will	be	no	airworthiness	certificate	issued	for	the aircraft,	should	this	exemption	be	granted,	no	FAA	regulatory	standard	will	exist for	determining	airworthiness.	Gi ven	the	size of	t he	aircraft	and	the requirements	for	maintenance	and	use	of	safety	checklists	prior	to	each	flight,	an equivalent	level	of	safety	will	be	provided.

14	CFR	91.9	(b)(2):	Civil	aircraft	flight	manual,	marking,	and	placard requirements

The sUAS,	given	its	size	and	configuration	has	no	ability	or	place	to	carry	such	a flight	manual	on	the	aircraft,	not	only	because	there	is	no	pilot	on	board,	but because	there	is	no	room	or	capacity	to	carry	such	an	item	on	the	a ircraft.The	equivalent	lev el	o f	safety	will	be	maintained	by keeping	a	flight	operations and	procedures	manual	that	exceeds	currently exceeds accepted	means	and

methods	for	safe	f light	at	the	ground	control	point	where the	pilot	flying	the

sUAS	will	have	immediate	access	to	it.	The FAA	has	issued	the	following exemptions	to	this	regulation:	Exemption	Nos.	8607,	8737,	8738,	9299,	9299A, 9565,	9565B,	10167,	10167A,	10602,32827,	and	10700.

14	C.F.R.	91.103:	Preflight Action

This	regulation	requires	each	pilot	in	command	(PIC)	take certain	actions	before flight	to	ensure	the	safety	of flight.	An	exemption	is	needed	from	this requirement	as	the	pilot	will	take	separate	preflight	actions,	including	checking for	weather	conditions,	checking	flight	battery	requirements,	checking	takeoff and	landing	areas,	and	all	other	actions	in	the	Preflight Checklist

. These	actions will	provide	an	equivalent	level	of	sa fety	and	are	prescribed	by	the Alaska

Channel sUAS	operations.

14	C.F.R.	91.109:	Flight	Instruction

Section	91.103	provides	that	no person	may	operate	a	civil	aircraft	(except	a manned	free	balloon)	that	is	being	used	for	flight	instruction	unless	that	aircraft has	fully	functioning	dual	controls.

By	design,	sUASs	and	remotely	piloted	aircraft	do	not	h ave	fully	functional	dual

contr o ls.	Flight	control	is	accomplished	through	the	use	of	a	control	box	that

communicates	with	the	aircraft	via	radio	communications.	The	FAA	has previously	approved	exemptions	for	aircraft	without	fully	functional	dual controls.	See	Exemption	Nos.5778K	&	986 2A.	The	equivalent	level	of	safety provided	by	the	fact	that	neither	a	pilot	nor	passengers	will	be	carried	in	the aircraft,	the	ability	to	control	the	sUAS	via	radio	signals	from	the	controller,	and by	the	size	and	speed	of	the	aircraft.

14	C.F.	R.	91.1 19:	Minimum	Safe Al titudes

Section	91.119	establishes	safe	altitudes	for	operation	of civil	aircraft.	Section 91.119	(d)	allows	helicopters	to	be	operated	at	less	than	the	minimums prescribed,	provided	the	person	operating	the	helicopter	complies	with	an y route	or	altitudes	prescribed	for	helicopters	by	the	FAA.	This	exemption	is	for	a

mult irotor	craft	that	flies	similarly	to	a	helicopter,	with	vertical	take	off	and vertical	landing,	which	will	typically	operate	at	altitudes	below	400' AGL,	so	an exemption	may	be	needed	to	allow	such	operations.	The	sUAS	will	never	operate at	altitude	highe r	than	400	AGL	and	will	be	in	a	restricted	area	with	security perimeter,	where	buildings	and	people	will	not	be	exposed	to	operations without	their	pre

- obtained	consent.The	equivalent	level	of	safety	will	be	achieved	given	the	size,	weight,	speed	of	the UAS	as	well	as	the	location	where	it	is	operated.	No	flight	will	be	taken	without the	permission of	t he	property	owner	or	local	officials.	Because of	t he	advance notice	to	the	property	owner	and	any	onsite	personnel

, all	affected	individuals

will	be	aware of	t he	planned	flight	operations.	Compared	to	flight	operations with	aircraft	or	rotorcraft	weighting	far	more	than	the	sUAS	proposed	herein, and	carrying	flammable	fuel,	any	risk	associated	with	our	operations	is	far	less than	those	presently	presented	w ith	helicopters	and	other	conventional	aircraft operating	at	or	below	500	AGL	in	the	construction of	filmmaking industry.	In addition,	the	low

- altitude	operations of	t he	sUAS	will	ensure	separation	between

these	small

- UAS	operations	and	the	operations	of conventional	aircraft	that must	comply	with	Section	91.119.

14	C.F.R.	91.121:	Altimeter	Settings

This	regulation	requires	each	person	operating	an	aircraft	to	maintain	cruising altitude	by	reference	to	an	altimeter	that	is	set	"...to	the	elevation	of	t he departure	airport	or	an	appropriate	altimeter	setting	available	before departure."	As	the	sUAS	may	not	have	a	barometric	altimeter, but	instead	a	GPS

altitude	read out,	an	exemption	may	be	needed.	An	equivalent	level	of	safety	will be	achieved	by	the	ope rator,	pursuant	to	the	pre

- flight	requirements	and checklists	confirming	the	altitude of	t he	launch	site	before	flight.

14	CFR	91.151	(a):	Fuel	requirements	for	flight	in	VFR	conditions

Section	91.151	(a)	outlines	fuel	requirements	for	beginning	a	fli ght	in	VFR conditions.	Our	UAS	is	limited	to	operations	in	sterile	and	controlled environments,	and	has	a	limited	range	and	flight	time	which	require	an exemption	from	14	CFR	91.151(a).

The	battery	powering	the	sUAS	provides	no	grea ter	than	3 0	minutes	of powered flight.	To	meet	the	3 0

- minute	reserve	requirement	in	14	CFR	§91.151,	sUAS flights	would	be	limited	to	approximately	0	minutes	in	length.	Given	the limitations	on	the	UAS'	s	proposed flight	area	and	the	location	o f	its	proposed operations	within	a predetermined	area,	a	longer	time	frame	for	flight	in daylight	or	night	VFR	conditions	is	reasonable.

Alaska	Channel believes	that	an	exemption	from	14	CFR	§91.151	(a)	falls	within the	scope	of	prior	exemptions.	See	Exemption	10673	(allowing	Lockheed	Mar tin Corporation	to	operate	without	compliance	with	FAR	91.151	(a)).	Operating	the small	UAS,	in	a	tightly	controlled	area	where	only	people	and	property	owners or	official	representatives	who	have	signed	waivers	will	be	allowed,	with	less

than	30	minutes	o f	reserve	fuel,	does	not	engender	the	type	of risks	that	Section 91.151(a)	was	intended	to	alleviate	given	the	s ize	and	speed	of	the	small	UAS. Additionally,	limiting	sUAS	flights	to	0	minutes	would	greatly	reduce	the	utility for	which	the	exemption	will	b e	granted.An	equivalent	level	of	safety	can	be	achieved	by	limiting	flights	to	30	minutes,	or enough	battery	reserve	to	ensure	that	the	sUAS	lands	at	the	ground	station	with at	least	20%	of	battery	power	(as	determined	by	the	onboard	monitoring	system

a nd	the	pilot),	whichever	happens	first.	This	restriction	would	be	more	than adequate	to	return	the	sUAS	to	its	planned landing	zone	from	anywhere	in	its limited	operating	area.

Similar	exemptions	have	been	granted	to	other	operations,	including Exemptio ns	2689F, 5745,	10673,and	10808.

14	CFR	91.203	(a)	&	(b):	Carrying	civil	aircraft	certification	and	registration

The	regulation	provides	in	part:

(a)	Except	as	provided	in§	91.715,	no	person	may	operate	a	civil	aircraft	unless	it

has	within	it	the	fo llowing:

(1)	An	appropriate	and	current	airworthiness certificate	.

.	.	.

(b)	No	person	may	operate	a	civil	aircraft	unless	the	airworthiness	certificate required	by	paragraph	(a)	of	this	section	or	a	special	flight	authorization	issued under	§91.715	i s	displayed	at	the	cabin	or	cockpit	entrance	so	that	it	is	legible	to

passengers	or	crew.

The	UAS	fully	loaded	weighs	no	more	than	25	lbs.	and	is	operated	without	an onboard	pilot.	Therefore	there	is	no	ability	or	place	to	carry	certification	and registr ation	documents	or	to	display	them	on	the	sUAS.

An	equivalent	level	of	safety	will	be	achieved	by	keeping	these	documents	at	the ground	flight	control	point	where	the	pilot	flying	the	sUAS	will	have	immediate access	to	them,	to	the	extent	they	are	applic able	to	the	sUAS.	The	FAA	has	issued numerous	exemptions	to	this	regulation.	A	representative	sample	of	other exceptions	includes	Exemption	Nos.	9565,	9665,9789,	9789A,	9797,	9797A, 9816A,	and	10700.

14	CFR	91.405	(a);	407	(a)(l);	409	(a)(2);	417	(a)	&	( b):	Maintenance	inspections

These	regulations	require	that	an	aircraft	operator	or	owner	"shall	have	that aircraft	inspected	as	prescribed	in	subpart	E of	t his	part	and	shall	between required	inspections,	except	as	provided	in	paragraph	(c) of	t his	secti on,	have discrepancies	repaired	as	prescribed	in	part	43	of	this	chapter	...,"	and	others shall	inspect	or	maintain	the	aircraft	in	compliance	with	Part	43.

Given	that	these	section	and	Part	43	apply	only	to	aircraft	with	an	airworthiness certificate,	th ese	sections	will	not	apply	to Alaska	Channel .	Maintenance	will	beaccomplished	by	the	operator pursuant	to	standard	procedures and manufacturer	guidance.	An	equivalent	level	of	safety	will	be	achieved	because these	small	UASs	are	very	limited	in	size	and	will	carry	a	small	payload	and operate	only	in	restricted	areas	for	limited	periods of	t ime.	If	mechanical	issues

arise	the	UAS can	land	immediately	and	will	be	operating	from	no	higher	than 400	feet	AGL	and	within	visual	line	of	sight	of	the	pilot. The pilot	will	ensure	that the	UAS	is	in	working	order	prior	to	initiating	flight,	has	the	required maintenance,	and	keep	a	log	of	an y	maintenance	performed/needed.	Moreover, the	pilot	is	the	person	most	familiar	with	the	aircraft	and	best	suited	to	maintain the	aircraft	in	an	airworthy	condition	to	provide	the	equivalent	level	of	safety.

Pursuant	to	14	C.P.R.	Part	11,	the	following	s ummary	is	provided	for	publication in	the	Federal	Register,	should	it	be	determined	that	publication	is	needed:

Applicant	seeks	an	exemption	from	the	following	rules:	14	C.F.R.	§21,	subpart	H; 14	C.F.R	45.23(b);	14	C.F.R.	§§	61.113(	a)	&	(b);91.7	(a);	9 1.9	(b)	(2);	91.103(b); 91.109;	91.119;	91.121;	91.151(a);	91.203(a)	and	(b);	91.405	(a);	91.407	(a)	(1); 91.409	(a)	(2);	91.409	(a)	(2)	and	91.417	(a)	&	(b)	to	operate	commercially	a small	unmanned	vehicle	(55 lbs	or	less)	in	construction	operations.

Ap proval	of	exemptions	allowing	commercial	operations	of	sUASs	in	the

construction and	filmmaking industr ies enhance	safety	while	reducing	risk. Manned	aircraft	creates	a	greater	risk	because	the	craft	are	much	larger,	have combustible	fuel,	and	carry	an	onb oard	human	pilot.	In	contrast,	a	sUAS weighing	fewer	than	25	lbs.	and	powered	by	batteries	eliminates	virtually	all of

t hat	risk	given	the	reduced	mass	and	lack	of	combustible	fuel	carried	on	board. The	sUAS	will	carry	no	passengers	or	crew	and,	therefore, will	not	expose	them to	the	risks	associated	with	manned	aircraft	flights.

The	operation	of	small	UASs,	weighting	less	than	25	lbs.,	conducted	in	the	strict conditions	outlined	above,	will	provide	an	equivalent	level	of	safety	supporting the	grant	of	th e	exemptions	requested	herein,	including	exempting	the	applicant from	the	requirements	of	Part	21	and	allowing	commercial	operations.	These lightweight	aircraft	operate	at	slow	speeds,	close	to	the	ground,	and	in	a	sterile environment	and,	as	a	result,	are far	safer	than	conventional	operations conducted	with	turbine	helicopters	operating	in	close	proximity	to	the	ground and	people.

Privacy

All	flights	will	occur	over	private	or	controlled	access	property	with	the	property owner's	prior	consent	and	kn ow ledge.	Images	taken	will	be	o f	individuals	who have	also	consented	to	being	filmed	or	otherwise	have	agreed	to	be	in	the	area where	aerial	photography	will	take	place.

*******Satisfaction	of	the	criteria	provided	in	Section	333	of	the	Reform	Act	of 201 2

-- size,	weight,	speed,	operating	capabilities,	proximity	to	airports	and	populated areas	and	oper ation	within	visual	line	o f	sight	and	national	security

-- provide more	than	adequa te	justification	for	the	grant	of	the	requested	exemptions allowing	commercial	operation	of	applicant's	UASs	in filmmaking, real	estate photography, remote	inspections,	and similar industries	requiring	aerial	data

collection.

Sincerely,

Bob	Kaufman

Alaska	Channel