alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from 
     MACAW CAPITAL, INC. September 30, 1997  financial  statements and  is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894542
<NAME>                        MACAW CAPITAL, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
§ 429.14 What criteria will Reclamation consider when reviewing applications? Reclamation will consider the following criteria when reviewing applications: ( a ) Compatibility with authorized project purposes, project operations, safety, and security;
( b ) Environmental compliance;
( c ) Compatibility with public interests;
( d ) Conflicts with Federal policies and initiatives;
( e ) Public health and safety;
( f ) Availability of other reasonable alternatives; and
( g ) Best interests of the United States.
Exhibit 4.345

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 135050 dated November 21, 2015

 

For Rendering

 

Local telephone communication services, excluding local telephone communication services using coin-box telephones and public access services

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

Communication systems (Zelenaya Tochka Group)

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1026801161639

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

6831017477

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

211 r., 16, Internacionalnaya str., Tambov, Tambov region, 392000

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until November 21, 2020.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated August 28, 2015 No. 580-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 071827
#### § 4.1100 Definitions.

As used in the regulations in this subpart, the term—

*Act* means the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, 91 Stat. 445 *et seq.,* 30 U.S.C. 1201 *et seq.*

*Administrative law judge* means an administrative law judge in the Hearings Division of the Office of Hearings and Appeals appointed under 5 U.S.C. 3105 (1970).

*Board* means the Board of Land Appeals in the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

*Hearings Division* means the Departmental Cases Hearings Division, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

*OHA* means the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of the Interior.

*OSM* and *OSMRE* mean the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Department of the Interior.

[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 49 FR 7565, Mar. 1, 1984; 59 FR 1488, Jan. 11, 1994; 67 FR 61509, Oct. 1, 2002; 88 FR 5795, Jan. 30, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     ALPACA, INC.  June 30, 1997  financial  statements and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894503
<NAME>                        ALPACA, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
M&I 2008 Sch B-3A F.Z12.xls

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF M&I VOLUNTARY PAYMENT AND SURPLUS APPLICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008

A B C D E F GH I 

Voluntary Payments Applied to Surplus' (Annual Analysis) 

Deficit Grand Total 

Facility/Contractor Prior Year Current Year 1/ 30-day window * Total Capital to Sch. B-2 Capital Deficit Refund 

(A+B+C) (D+E) 

Contra Costa Canal

Contra Costa WD - $ 51,720.93 $ - $ 51,720.93 $ 51,720.93 $ 

Delta Mendota Canal

San Luis WD $ 

(186.02) 

Folsom D & R

City of Roseville 66,490.79 $ - $ - $ 66,490.79 $ - $ 66,490.79 $ City of Roseville 6,182.00 $ - $ - $ 6,182.00 $ - $ 6,182.00 $ 3/San Juan WD $ 

(16,482.27) 

$ - 72,672.79 $ - $ 72,672.79 $ - $ 72,672.79 $ - $ - $ (16,482.27) $ 

$ 

Folsom South Canal

East Bay MUD 520,281.28 $ - $ - $ 520,281.28 $ - $ 520,281.28 $ East Bay MUD 520,909.86 $ - $ - $ 520,909.86 $ - $ 520,909.86 $  Total Folsom South Canal 1,041,191.14 $ - $ - $ 1,041,191.14 $ - $ 1,041,191.14 $ - $ - $ - $ 

$ 

Sacramento River

City of Redding $ 

(9,723.03) 

City of West Sacramento $ 

(9,694.26) 

$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (19,417.29) $ 

$ 

San Luis Canal - Tracy

San Luis WD $ 

(738.81) 

Spring Creek Conduit

Shasta CSD 740.65 $ 33.92 $ - $ 774.57 $ - $ 774.57 $ 

Tehama-Colusa Canal

Colusa County WD 515.94 $ 515.94 $ - $ 515.94 $ 5/

Toyon Pipeline

City of Redding $ 

(42.16) 

City of Shasta Lake 17,821.64 $ - $ - $ 17,821.64 $ - $ 17,821.64 $ 2/City of Shasta Lake 1,551.90 $ - $ - $ 1,551.90 $ - $ 1,551.90 $ 3/ Total Toyon Pipeline 19,373.54 $ - $ - $ 19,373.54 $ - $ 19,373.54 $ - $ - $ (42.16) $ 

$ 

Total $ 51,754.85 1,133,978.12 $ 515.94 $ 1,186,248.91 $ - $ 1,186,248.91 $ - $ - $ (36,866.55) $ 

$ 

FOOTNOTES

1/ Only voluntary payments applied to CY deficits are included in the interim accountings. All voluntary payments (CY & PY) are included in the final accountings.

2/ Applied the amount over actual costs shown on the 2007 annual accounting analysis at the contractor's request.3/ Applied the revenue over obligation amount shown on the 2007 annual accounting analysis at the contractor's request.4/ Applied to irrigation FY 2008 deficit for San Luis Canal - Tracy at the contractor's request.5/ Applied portion of payment over obligation amount shown on the 2008 annual accounting analysis per the contractors' request.

* Based on the voluntary payment policy, contractors can qualify to pay for FY 2008 after the end of the year. Contractors are given a 30-day window to make payments. 

These payments are included and will be applied to FY 2008. 

9/21/2009
§ 106.302 What provisions must be set forth in a Fee Based Record? A Fee Based Record must contain the following: ( a ) A narrative description of the Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activity;
( b ) A certification by the Responsible Program Official that he or she will abide by the requirements contained in this part, as well as all other applicable statutes, regulations, policies and procedures for Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activities;
( c ) A proposed budget demonstrating: ( 1 ) All sources of funding, including annual appropriations, Participant Fees and Gifts, to be used in support of the Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activity;
( 2 ) A reasonable estimation of all anticipated expenses, which indicates that no profit is anticipated from the Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activity; and
( 3 ) A provision stating that Participant Fees, if charged, will not exceed the minimal amount needed to cover the anticipated direct costs of the Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activity as outlined in the budget;
( d ) With regard to any donations made in support of the Fee Based SBA-Sponsored Activity, the Fee Based Record will reflect the following: ( 1 ) Each Donor may receive appropriate recognition for its Gift; and
( 2 ) Any printed or electronically generated material recognizing a Donor will include a prominent disclaimer stating that the acceptance of the Gift does not constitute or imply an endorsement by SBA of the Donor or the Donor's products or services.
### PART III—DEFINITIONS; SPECIAL RULES

Sec.
1388.
Definitions; special rules.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–834, §17(a), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 1049, added heading of part III and item 1388.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22009-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN

COOPERATIEVE RABOBANK U.A., 

NEW YORK BRANCH, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

EISNERAMPER LLP,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Transfer 

Venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the 

“Motion”) (ECF No. 6). Plaintiffs do not oppose the Motion, and the Parties have filed a 

stipulation agreeing that this matter shall be transferred to the Southern District of New 

York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). ECF No. 7. Having reviewed the Motion, the 

stipulation, and the relevant authorities, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Transfer Venue 

to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (ECF No. 6). The 

Clerk shall TRANSFER this matter to the Southern District of New York and CLOSE this 

case.

DONE and ORDERED in chambers, Miami, Florida, this 27th day of May 2020.

Copies furnished to: 

Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/27/2020 Page 1 of 1
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Travel Washington DC
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employees Benefits Security Administration   

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a public teleconference meeting will be held on Thursday, October 28, 2004, of the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans Working Group assigned to study plan fees as reported on the Form 5500.   

The session will take place in Room S4215-C, U.S. Department of Labor Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 1 p.m. to approximately 4 p.m., is for Working Group members to discuss and conclude their report/recommendations for the Secretary of Labor.   

Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written statement pertaining to the topic may do so by submitting 20 copies to Larry Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5656, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Statement received on or before October 20, 2004 will be included in the record of the meeting. Individuals or representatives of organizations wishing to address the Work Group should forward their request to the Executive Secretary at the above address or via telephone at (202) 693-8668. Oral presentations will be limited to 20 minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities who need special accommodations should contact Larry Good by October 20 at the address indicated in this notice.   

Signed at Washington, DC this 5th day of October, 2004.   

Ann L. Combs,   

Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration.   

[FR Doc. 04-22794  Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]   

BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
#### Nelly T. Roessle and Others v. Edwin B. Halsey.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
May 

### 4,2015

U.S.Department of

### Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New |erseyAve., SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Sir

### or Madam: Slugwear, Inc. dba LikeonATree Aerial was issued an Exemption numbered 11157 for the purpose ofconducting aerial photography and survey for various industries. LikeonATree Aerial hereby requests an amendment to the Exemptionto allow an 

### additional Dfl Phantom 2quadcopter to operate under the conditions ofthe exemption. The manufacturer serial number for this 

### Dfl Phantom 2 is: 

### PH646426302 Upon approval, LikeonATree Aerial 

### will operate this 

### additional Dll Phantom 2 quadcopter under the same conditions and 

### limitations outlined inthe

### current Exemption 

### LII57.
Please do not hesitate to contact me

### with any questions concerning this request. 

# mtuk

LikeonATree Aerial 206-227-5406
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4709 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4709

 To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to amend regulations to allow 
  for certain packers to have an interest in market agencies, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2022

 Mr. Lujan (for himself and Ms. Ernst) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to amend regulations to allow 
  for certain packers to have an interest in market agencies, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Local Meat Processing Act 
of 2022''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWED INTEREST OF CERTAIN PACKERS IN MARKET AGENCIES.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall revise section 201.67 
of title 9, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of 
enactment of this Act), to exempt the packers described in subsection 
(b) from the prohibition described in that section.
    (b) Packers Described.--A packer referred to in subsection (a) is a 
packer that--
            (1) with respect to cattle or sheep, has a cumulative 
        slaughter capacity of less than--
                    (A) 2,000 animals per day; or
                    (B) 700,000 animals per year; and
            (2) with respect to hogs, has a cumulative slaughter 
        capacity of less than--
                    (A) 10,000 animals per day; or
                    (B) 3,000,000 animals per year.
                                 <all>
```
# OUTPUT

Schedule A-6APage &P of &N

# Footnotes

Schedule A-6APage &P of &N

Print Output
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2004N-0103]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Guidance for Industry on Special 
Protocol Assessment

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Guidance for Industry on Special 
Protocol Assessment'' has been approved by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Nelson, Office of Management 
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1482.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of July 9, 2004 (69 
FR 41502), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0470. 
The approval expires on September 30, 2007. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets dockets.

    Dated: October 4, 2004.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22762 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0169p.06 

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

_________________ 

### D ERRICK 

### B ELL 

### , Petitioner-Appellant,
v. KURT 

### J ONES 

### , Warden, Carson City Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee. X - - - - > , - - - - N No. 08-1775

Filed: May 12, 2009 Before: MERRITT, MARTIN, and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges.

_________________ ORDER

_________________ Derrick Bell petitions for rehearing en banc of this court’s order entered January 6, 2009, by a single judge of this court denying his application for a certificate of appealability. The petition was initially referred to a panel of three judges on which the original deciding judge does not sit. After review of the petition, this panel composed of one active judge and two senior judges issued an order announcing its conclusion that the original application was properly denied. The petition was then circulated to all of the active judges of the court. No active judge nor the senior judges of this panel having requested a vote on the suggestion for an en banc rehearing, the pane l now, pursuant to established court procedures, denies the petition for rehearing en banc. 

### ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT /s/ Leonard Green

_______________________ ____________ Clerk

1
# OUTPUT

Schedule A-5Page &P of &N  

# Footnotes

Schedule A-5Page &P of &N