alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 502 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 502

  To amend chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, to incorporate 
   zero-emission fueling technology into the definition of ``capital 
                               project''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2021

 Ms. Cortez Masto introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
  and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, to incorporate 
   zero-emission fueling technology into the definition of ``capital 
                               project''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``More Access to ZEV Equipment in 
Transit Act'' or the ``MAZE in Transit Act''.

SEC. 2. ZERO-EMISSION FUELING TECHNOLOGY.

    Section 5302(3)(G)(v) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subclauses (XII), (XIII), and (XIV) as 
        subclauses (XIII), (XIV), and (XV), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subclause (XI) the following:
                                    ``(XII) technology to fuel a zero 
                                emission vehicle (as defined in section 
                                5339(c));''.
                                 <all>
```
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–200 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 6, ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005 

JULY 27, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 394] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 394, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 6, the Energy Policy Act of 2005, and 

against its consideration. The resolution also provides that the conference report shall be considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order is necessary because the conference report was filed with the House on Wednesday, July 27, 

2005 and it may be considered by the House as early as Thursday, 

July 28, 2005, which would violate clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring 

a three-day layover of conference reports and the accompanying 

joint explanatory statement). 

Æ
SCPW

- 23

- 0000 5 86

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

CATHERINE M. SHYNE , Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE KATHLEEN N.A. WATANABE , J udge of the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit, State of Hawai ʻ i , Respondent Judge,

and

TBC KOLOA TOWN LLC , Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (C ASE NO. 5CCV

- 21

- 0000032 )

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ.,

Circuit Judge Remigio and Circuit Judge Souza , assigned by reason of vacancies)

Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus,

filed on October 16 , 2023 ( Petition ), the documents attac hed and

submitted in support, and the record, Petitioner Catherine M.

Shyne failed to establish a “clear and indisputable right to the

relief requested and a lack of other means to redress adequately Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-23-0000586 20-OCT-2023 11:32 AM Dkt. 22 ODDP2 the alleged wrong or to obtain the requested action.” See Kema

v. Gaddis , 91 Hawai ʻ i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999).

Here, d epending on the outcome of the hearings in the

underlying post

- judgment proceeding it appears Petitioner could

pursue normal appellate procedures to challenge any purported

error by the circuit court. See e.g. , Ditto v. McCurdy , 103

Hawai ʻ i 153, 157, 80 P.3d 974, 978 (2003) (discussing post

judgment orders and when they may be appealed); Harada v. Ellis ,
60 Haw. 467, 480, 591 P.2d 1060, 1070 (1979) ( discussing the

collateral order doctrine and contempt). It is well

- established

that a petiti on for writ of mandamus is not meant to serve as a

legal remedy in lieu of normal appellate procedure. See Kema ,

91 Hawai ʻ i at 204, 982 P.2d at 338.

Next, b ased on a review of the record it cannot be said

that the circuit court committed a flagrant and manifest abuse

of discretion in scheduling the hearing dates at the same time.

Here, a number of hearings related to the debtor exam ination

occurred before th e upcoming October 25, 2023 hearing , yet

despite receiving notice of these hearings through the Judiciary

Electronic Filing System (J EFS ) , counsel for Petitioner failed

to appear. See Rules of the Circuit Courts of the State of

Hawai ʻ i , Rule 15(b) (“Expedition of Court Business”) ; see also

Electronic Filing and Service Rules, Rule 6 (“The Notice of

Electronic Filing automatically generated by JEFS and JIMS3 constitutes service of the electronically filed document to JEFS

Users. ”). In short, as to this ground and based on the

circumstances raised by Petitioner , we decline to entertain the

petition

.

In sum, n one of the arguments made by Petitioner support

the issuance of the requested writ. In so holding, we do not

decide any question as to the merits.

The burden was on Petitioner to establish the extraordinary

circumstances to warrant mandamus. We find that Petitioner

failed to carry this burden.

It is ordered that the Petition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, October 20 , 2023.

/s/ Mark E. R ecktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Catherine H. Remigio

/s/ Kevin A.K. Souza
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0975 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 082 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
§ 3190.0-5 Definitions. As used in this part, the term: ( a ) *Inspection* means the examination of oil and gas lease sites, records or motor vehicle documentation by an authorized representative of the Secretary of the Interior to determine if there is compliance with applicable regulations, Onshore Oil and Gas orders, approvals, Notices to Lessees and Operators, approvals, other written orders, the mineral leasing laws, and the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act.
( b ) *Investigation* means any inquiry into any action by or on behalf of a lessee or operator of a Federal or Indian lease, or transporter of oil from such lease.
( c ) *Contractor* means any individual, corporation, association, partnership, consortium or joint venture who has contracted to carry out activities under this part.
( d ) *Enforcement* means action taken by an authorized representative of the Secretary in order to obtain compliance with applicable regulations, Onshore Oil and Gas Orders, Notices to Lessees and Operators, approvals, other written orders, the mineral leasing laws, and the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act.
( e ) *Indian lands* means any lands or interests in lands of an Indian tribe or an Indian allottee held in trust by the United States or which is subject to Federal restriction against alienation, including mineral resources and mineral estates reserved to an Indian tribe or Indian allottee in the conveyance of a surface or nonmineral estate, except that such term does not include any lands subject to the provisions of section 3 of the Act of June 28, 1906 (34 Stat. 539).
( f ) *Proprietary data* means information obtained from a lessee that constitutes trade secrets, or commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential, or other information that may be withheld under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)).
# J T**==============~~**

May7, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 RE: Exemption 10870 Dear Sir Jet Select, LLC a Part 135 on demand operator based in Columbus, Ohio would like to formally request an extension to Exemption 10870 issued byyour office. Reference: Docket Number FAA-2009-0333 We are requesting that our crewmembers be able to continue to operate domestically with a lostordestroyed certificate provided they are given a copy of the current lost or destroyed certificate that is contained in ourapproved record keeping system. Furthermore,we askthat this applyto all flight crewmembers employed byJet Select while engaged in flight operations for the organization. It is our beliefthat granting an extension ofthis exemption is in the interest of the public and provides no reduction in the level of safety since the crewmember actually holds the lost or destroyed certificate. Sincerely,
Gregory Marcussen· Director of Operations, Jet Select LLC**614-338~4389**

4130 E. Fifth Ave., Columbus, OH 43219 (614) 338-4380- Office (614) 338-0984- Fax
§ 7.16 Civil penalty amounts. ( a ) *Maximum amount of penalty.* ( 1 ) Where the person being assessed a civil penalty has not committed any previous violation of any prohibition in § 7.4 or of any term or condition included in a permit issued pursuant to this part, the maximum amount of the penalty shall be the full cost of restoration and repair of archaeological resources damaged plus the archaeological or commercial value of archaeological resources destroyed or not recovered.
( 2 ) Where the person being assessed a civil penalty has committed any previous violation of any prohibition in § 7.4 or of any term or condition included in a permit issued pursuant to this part, the maximum amount of the penalty shall be double the cost of restoration and repair plus double the archaeological or commercial value of archaeological resources destroyed or not recovered.
( 3 ) Violations limited to the removal of arrowheads located on the surface of the ground shall not be subject to the penalties prescribed in this section.
( b ) *Determination of penalty amount, mitigation, and remission.* The Federal land manager may assess a penalty amount less than the maximum amount of penalty and may offer to mitigate or remit the penalty. ( 1 ) Determination of the penalty amount and/or a proposal to mitigate or remit the penalty may be based upon any of the following factors: ( i ) Agreement by the person being assessed a civil penalty to return to the Federal land manager archaeological resources removed from public lands or Indian lands;
( ii ) Agreement by the person being assessed a civil penalty to assist the Federal land manager in activity to preserve, restore, or otherwise contribute to the protection and study of archaeological resources on public lands or Indian lands;
( iii ) Agreement by the person being assessed a civil penalty to provide information which will assist in the detection, prevention, or prosecution of violations of the Act or this part;
( iv ) Demonstration of hardship or inability to pay, provided that this factor shall only be considered when the person being assessed a civil penalty has not been found to have previously violated the regulations in this part;
( v ) Determination that the person being assessed a civil penalty did not willfully commit the violation;
( vi ) Determination that the proposed penalty would constitute excessive punishment under the circumstances;
( vii ) Determination of other mitigating circumstances appropriate to consideration in reaching a fair and expeditious assessment.
( 2 ) When the penalty is for a violation on Indian lands, the Federal land manager shall consult with and consider the interests of the Indian landowner and the Indian tribe having jurisdiction over the Indian lands prior to proposing to mitigate or remit the penalty.
( 3 ) When the penalty is for a violation which may have had an effect on a known Indian tribal religious or cultural site on public lands, the Federal land manager should consult with and consider the interests of the affected tribe(s) prior to proposing to mitigate or remit the penalty.
[49 FR 1027, Jan. 6, 1984, as amended at 52 FR 47721, Dec. 16, 1987]
#### § 4.325 How will the appeal be docketed?

The Board will docket the appeal on receiving the probate record from the LTRO or the administrative record from the judge, and will provide a notice of the docketing and the table of contents for the record to all interested parties as shown by the record on appeal. The docketing notice will specify the deadline for filing briefs and will cite the procedural regulations governing the appeal.

[73 FR 67288, Nov. 13, 2008]
### §7328. Cross references

**(1) For the issuance of certificates of probable cause relieving officers making seizures of responsibility for damages, see 28 U. S. C. 2465.**

**(2) For provisions relating to forfeitures generally in connection with alcohol taxes, see chapter 51.**

**(3) For provisions relating to forfeitures generally in connection with tobacco taxes, see chapter 52.**

**(4) For provisions relating to forfeitures generally in connection with taxes on certain firearms, see chapter 53.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 871, §7329; renumbered §7328, Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1904(b)(8)(H)(i), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1816.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7328, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 871, provided for confiscation of white phosphorus matches exported or attempted to be exported, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–455, §1904(b)(8)(H)(i).

A prior section 7329 was renumbered section 7328 of this title.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

39–011 2005

109th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 109–43

EXTENSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY FOR 

TURKMENISTAN

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE SECRETARY, THE DEPARTMENT OF 

STATE

TRANSMITTING

NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION THAT A WAIVER OF THE 

APPLICATION OF SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 402 OF 

THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 WITH RESPECT TO TURKMENISTAN 

WILL SUBSTANTIALLY PROMOTE THE OBJECTIVES OF SECTION 

402, PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. 2432(c) AND (d)

JULY 11, 2005.—Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means and 

ordered to be printed 


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(1)

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 

Washington, DC. 

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, 

Speaker of the House. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: On behalf of the Secretary of State, we are 

transmitting to you a Report to the Congress, referred to in subsection 402(d)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 (the ‘‘Act’’), as amended, 

with respect to the continuation of a waiver of application of subsections (a) and (b) of section 402 of the Act to Turkmenistan. 

This document constitutes the Secretary’s recommendation to 

continue this waiver for a further twelve-month period and includes her determination that continuation of the waiver currently 

in effect for Turkmenistan will substantially promote the objectives 

of section 402 of the Act, and the reasons for such determination. 

We hope that this information will be helpful to you and other 

Members of Congress. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can 

be of further assistance. 

Sincerely, 

MATTHEW A. REYNOLDS, 

Acting Assistant Secretary, Legislative Affairs. 

Enclosure: As stated. 

(3)


Insert graphic folio 3 here HD43.001
4


Insert graphic folio 4 here HD43.002
5

Æ


Insert graphic folio 5 here HD43.003
Exhibit 4.427

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182248 dated April 06, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Mobile radio telephone communication services in the allocated telecommunications network

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until April 06, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 06, 2020 No. 145-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION 
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS,
   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119303
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section




National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Science





Contact Us
  Stories of Studying People
 Education ranger showing students an insect.Education researchers study how children learn in parks. NPS National parks have many things scientists like to study–rocks, plants, archeological sites, wildlife. Different parks have different natural and cultural resources that interest scientists. But one thing all parks have in common? People! Social scientists come to national parks to study people. Parks are “social laboratories” that can yield valuable insights about people, our activities, and the meanings we find in parks. The National Park Service, its partners, and external researchers use social science results to understand and improve visitor experiences in parks.There are many kinds of research questions relvant to parks. For example: What and how do visitors learn from interpreters, visitor centers, and trail-side displays?
How, when, where, and why do people spend money when they visit parks and surrounding communities?
How do visitors behave in the presence of wildlife?
What makes for effective education programs and school field trips?
What motivates people to volunteer in parks?
What values–cultural, political, social, economic, spiritual, educational–do people associate with national parks? Explore this page to learn about what social scientists do in parks and what they’re discovering.
 Show1040 per page
 Last updated: December 6, 2023
 Visual Resource Inventories
 Visitors
 Socioeconomic Monitoring
 People in Parks
Social Science
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
Reducing the 

Threat of Fuel 

Release from the 

Red Hill Fuel 

Storage Facility

A Unique Engineering 

Challenge
Why is the Red Hill Situation Unique

• Large Scale Field Constructed 

Underground Tanks Are Rare

• Most Large Fuel Storage 

Facilities Utilize Above 

Ground Tanks

• The Construction Approach 

to the Facility was Unique

• Facility is deeper than typical 

underground tanks

• The Geologic Setting is 

Particularly Complex
Complex Geologic Setting
Navy Has Currently Exceeded State

and Federal Requirements for 

Operation of Red Hill USTs

• Leak Detection

• Tank Tightness Testing

• Tank Maintenance

• Pipeline Testing
DOH and EPA Are Currently Working 

with the Navy To Develop a 

Structured Approach for Making 

Further Improvements to the Red Hill 

UST Facility

• Improvements in Fuel Isolation Infrastructure

• Improvements in Evaluating and Controlling Corrosion 

and Metal Fatigue

• Improvements in Leak Detection 

• Evaluation and Implementation of Secondary 

Containment if Practicable

• Development and Implementation of Improved 

Catastrophic Release Contingency Plans
Gas Station Technology Has Evolved 

Considerably Since the 1940s
Modern Fuel Underground Tanks
Improvements in Commercial Fuel 

Storage

• Improvements in Storage Tank Materials

• Active Corrosion Protection

• Secondary Containment

• Continuous Leak Detection Monitoring

• Routine Inspections and Equipment Testing

• Environmental Monitoring
What Can Be Done To Further 

Reduce Threat From Red Hill

• Further Improvements to Corrosion Protection

• Further Analysis of Metal Fatigue 

• Further Improvement to Leak Detection System

• Installation of Secondary Containment if Deemed 

Practicable
What is Corrosion

• The breaking down or 

destruction of a 

material, especially a 

metal, through chemical 

reactions. The most 

common form of 

corrosion is rusting, 

which occurs when iron 

combines with oxygen 

and water. 
What is Tank Secondary 

Containment
What is Metal Fatigue

• Fatigue is the 

weakening of a 

material caused by 

repeatedly applied 

loads. It is the 

progressive and 

localized structural 

damage that occurs 

when a material is 

subjected to cyclic 

loading.
Potential Adverse Impacts of 

Release of Fuel