alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5087 

To amend the Not Invisible Act of 2019 to extend, and provide additional 

support for, the activities of the Department of the Interior and the 

Department of Justice Joint Commission on Reducing Violent Crime 

Against Indians, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2022 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Ms. CORTEZ MASTO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Not Invisible Act of 2019 to extend, and 

provide additional support for, the activities of the Department of the Interior and the Department of Justice 

Joint Commission on Reducing Violent Crime Against 

Indians, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 5087 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF, AND ADDITIONAL SUPPORT 

2 FOR THE ACTIVITIES OF, THE DEPARTMENT 

3 OF THE INTERIOR AND THE DEPARTMENT OF 

4 JUSTICE JOINT COMMISSION ON REDUCING 

5 VIOLENT CRIME AGAINST INDIANS. 

6 (a) EXTENSION OF COMMISSION AND ACTIVITIES OF

7 THE COMMISSION.—Section 4 of the Not Invisible Act of 

8 2019 (Public Law 116–166; 134 Stat. 767) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (c)(2)(B), by striking ‘‘18 

10 months after the enactment’’ and inserting ‘‘36 

11 months after the date of enactment’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘2 years’’ and 

13 inserting ‘‘42 months’’. 

14 (b) ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR ACTIVITIES OF COM15 MISSION.—Section 4(b) of the Not Invisible Act of 2019 

16 (Public Law 116–166; 134 Stat. 767) is amended— 

17 (1) in the subsection heading, by inserting ‘‘; 

18 OPERATION’’ after ‘‘MEMBERSHIP’’; and 

19 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(7) FUNDING.—The Secretary of the Interior 

21 and the Attorney General shall contribute the funds 

22 necessary for the operation of the Commission. 

23 ‘‘(8) GIFTS.—The Commission may accept and 

24 use gifts or donations of services or property from 

25 Indian tribes or Tribal entities, academic institu26 tions, or other not-for-profit organizations as it conVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:03 Nov 16, 2022 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S5087.IS S5087

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 5087 IS

1 siders necessary to carry out the duties of the Com2 mission described in subsection (c).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# BARK Ranger Program at Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park

Marsh - Billings - Rockefeller National Historical Park
§ 3809.600 With what frequency will BLM inspect my operations? ( a ) At any time, BLM may inspect your operations, including all structures, equipment, workings, and uses located on the public lands. The inspection may include verification that your operations comply with this subpart. See § 3715.7 of this title for special provisions governing inspection of the inside of structures used solely for residential purposes.
( b ) At least 4 times each year, BLM will inspect your operations if you use cyanide or other leachate or where there is significant potential for acid drainage.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50154

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TERESITA ARRAMBIDE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:18-CV-618

Before DENNIS, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Teresita Arrambide, federal prisoner # 21145-479, was convicted of 

conspiring to commit money laundering, and she was sentenced to 30 months 

of imprisonment. Without holding the evidentiary hearing that Arrambide 

requested, the district court denied her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion on the merits. 

Arrambide now requests a certificate of appealability (COA).

To obtain a COA, a petitioner must make “a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Slack v. McDaniel, 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 28, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-50154 Document: 00515325808 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/28/2020
No. 19-50154

2

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Arrambide argues that trial counsel gave her bad 

sentencing advice, inducing her guilty plea with an incorrect estimation of her 

likely sentence, and that trial counsel should have sought a reduction in her 

offense level because she played only a minor role in the offense. Arrambide 

has not made the required showing to obtain a COA on these claims. See Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484. We do not consider her arguments, raised for the first time in 

her COA brief, that counsel should have moved for a downward departure 

based on her cultural assimilation under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 and under U.S.S.G. 

§ 5H1.6 because she has two minor children in her care. See Black v. Davis, 

902 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, No. 18-9645, 2020 WL 129541 

(U.S. Jan. 13, 2020). Arrambide’s motion for a COA is therefore denied.

We construe Arrambide’s motion for a COA with respect to the district 

court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing as a direct appeal of that issue, see 

Norman v. Stephens, 817 F.3d 226, 234 (5th Cir. 2016), and affirm. 

Arrambide’s request that this court conduct an evidentiary hearing is denied.

COA DENIED; AFFIRMED; EVIDENTIARY HEARING DENIED.

 Case: 19-50154 Document: 00515325808 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/28/2020
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Wilderness & Spotsylvania Anniversaries
#### Gertrude H. Myers, Appellant, v. 139 East 79th Street, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P-. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         192,398
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,306,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,139,844
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,306,279
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (15,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. 649 Madison Avenue Corporation, Appellant, against William W. Mills et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents. [649-651 Madison Ave., Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Abraham Kronenberg et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Kronen Silk Co., Respondents, and Belle Maid Dress Corp., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §7472. Expenditures

The Tax Court is authorized to make such expenditures (including expenditures for personal services and rent at the seat of Government and elsewhere, and for law books, books of reference, and periodicals), as may be necessary efficiently to execute the functions vested in the Tax Court. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Tax Court is authorized to pay on behalf of its judges, age 65 or over, any increase in the cost of Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance imposed after April 24, 1999, that is incurred after the date of the enactment of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, including any expenses generated by such payments, as authorized by the chief judge in a manner consistent with such payments authorized by the Judicial Conference of the United States pursuant to section 604(a)(5) of title 28, United States Code. Except as provided in section 7475, all expenditures of the Tax Court shall be allowed and paid, out of any moneys appropriated for purposes of the Tax Court, upon presentation of itemized vouchers therefor signed by the certifying officer designated by the chief judge.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 888; Pub. L. 99–514, title XV, §1553(b)(1), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2754; Pub. L. 109–280, title VIII, §852, Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 1016; Pub. L. 111–8, div. D, title VI, §618(a), Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 677.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, referred to in text, is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 109–280, which was approved Aug. 17, 2006.

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–8, which directed the amendment of section 7472 of "title 26, United States Code" by inserting "after April 24, 1999, that is incurred" after "imposed" in second sentence, was executed to this section, which is section 7472 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

2006—Pub. L. 109–280 inserted after first sentence "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Tax Court is authorized to pay on behalf of its judges, age 65 or over, any increase in the cost of Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance imposed after the date of the enactment of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, including any expenses generated by such payments, as authorized by the chief judge in a manner consistent with such payments authorized by the Judicial Conference of the United States pursuant to section 604(a)(5) of title 28, United States Code."

1986—Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Except as provided in section 7475, all" for "All" in second sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2009 Amendment

Pub. L. 111–8, div. D, title VI, §618(b), Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 677, provided that: "This amendment [amending this section] shall take effect as if included in the amendment made by section 852 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 [Pub. L. 109–280]."

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–514 effective Jan. 1, 1987, see section 1553(c) of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as an Effective Date note under section 7475 of this title.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 2 4 , 2018 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00787
- CV IN RE WILLIAM CLIFFO RD BUTLER , Relator Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F92
- 20707 SV 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Lang

- Miers In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus dire cting the district court clerk to provide him access to the trial court record and trial transcript so that relator may review the record and file a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. This Court does not have jurisd iction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless it is necessary to enforce our own jurisdiction. T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221(a) (court of appeals may only issue writ of mandamus against district and county judges or as necessary to enforce jurisdiction of appellate court); In re Wilkerson , No. 05

- 16

- 00322

- CV, 2016 WL 1320815, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Apr. 5, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (citing In re Simpson , 997 S.W.2d 939, 939 (Tex. App.

—

Waco 1999, orig. proceeding)). Relator has no appeal pending in this Court– 2

–

and, therefore, our jurisdiction is not in jeopardy. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

180787F.P05 /Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01542**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 01542\01542_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01542\01542_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 01542\01542_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 01542\01542_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01542\01542_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01542\01542_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01542\Certification Statement Plant ID 01542.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 01542\Supporting Documentation\01542_PB - EPA Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01542\Supporting Documentation\01542_PB - Site Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01542\Supporting Documentation\01542_PB - Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate
general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|/S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III                                   
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief
Executive Officer August 10, 2006  
|                                                           
|/S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                                 
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial Officer August 10, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 9/30/97
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001043102
<NAME> CHANCELLOR MEDIA CORPORATION OF LOS ANGELES
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  193,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,684
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,544
<PP&E>                                         191,931
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,213,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,739
<BONDS>                                      1,857,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          338,566
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,213,376
<SALES>                                        333,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               333,283
<CGS>                                           49,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  300,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,244
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                638
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,350)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §883d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–586, §5, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1296, which authorized the prescription of rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of former sections 883 to 883d of this title, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-574

Lower Tribunal No. CF16-007533-XX

_____________________________

CHARLES MILLER,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Donald G. Jacobsen, Judge.

February 6, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and NARDELLA and MIZE, JJ., concur.

Charles Miller, Malone, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor and 

Jonathan S. Tannen, Assistant Attorneys General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
#### § 3217.10 What are unit agreements?

Under unit agreements, lessees unite with each other, or jointly or separately with others, in collectively adopting and operating under agreements to conserve the resources of any geothermal reservoir, field, or like area, or any part thereof. BLM will only approve unit agreements that we determine are in the public interest. Unit agreement application procedures are provided in part 3280 of this chapter.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22378-CIV-WILLIAMS

MARQUAZE LEROY EDMONDS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JONATHAN SKINNER, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s report 

and recommendations (DE 3) (“Report”) regarding Plaintiff’s pro se civil rights complaint 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (DE 1). Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report. Upon 

an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, it is ORDERED 

AND ADJUDGED that the conclusions in the Report (DE 3) are AFFIRMED AND 

ADOPTED. 

The Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Florida, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1406(a). All 

pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

Case 1:20-cv-22378-KMW Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE AND ORDERED in chambers in Miami, Florida, this 10th day of September, 

2020.

CC: Marquaze Leroy Edmonds

E355552943480

Miami-Dade County-PDC

Pretrial Detention Center

Inmate Mail/Parcels

1321 NW 13th Street

Miami, FL 33125

PRO SE

Case 1:20-cv-22378-KMW Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2020 Page 2 of 2
|Exhibit
    32.1
|----------------
|                

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Neoware Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Kantrowitz, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:


| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                           
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

|                                                                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL
          KANTROWITZMichael
    Kantrowitz 
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive
    Officer)
    May 17, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.




---