alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered September 2 6 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00172
- CR
CHARLES VERNON HAYNE S, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006
- 80283
- 2013



### O RDER On July 16, 2014, the Court entered an order granting appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file his brief

. The order extended the time to file appellant’s brief extended until August 13, 2014. To date, appellant has neither filed a brief nor communicated further with the Court.
We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and

recommen dations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s prese nce at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708(Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is

ORDERED to take such measures as m ay be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JU STICE
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Geocom Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Chung, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: October 6, 2006.

/s/ Paul Chung                                                  

Paul Chung 

Chief Financial Officer, and Director

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

D/JLM/906148.1
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of E Med Future, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 (the Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Donald Sullivan                  
|DONALD SULLIVAN                      
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND INTERIM  
|PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Date:
November 21, 2005
§ 4.1040 When and where will the hearing be held? ( a ) *Time and place.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the hearing will be held at the time and place set at the initial prehearing conference under § 4.1022(a)(1)(iii), generally within 90 days after the date DCHD issues the docketing notice under § 4.1020(a)(3).
( 2 ) The ALJ will consider the convenience of all parties, their representatives, and witnesses in setting the time and place for hearing.
( b ) *Change.* On motion by a party or on the ALJ's initiative, the ALJ may change the date, time, or place of the hearing if he or she finds: ( 1 ) That there is good cause for the change; and
( 2 ) That the change will not unduly prejudice the parties and witnesses.
§ 3514.25 When does my lease expire? ( a ) Sodium, sulphur, asphalt, and hardrock mineral leases expire at the end of the lease term. If you file a timely application for lease renewal under § 3511.27 of this part, your lease expires on the expiration date or the date BLM rejected your application, whichever is later.
( b ) Potassium, phosphate and gilsonite leases continue for so long as you comply with the lease terms and conditions which are subject to periodic readjustment.
( c ) For more information, see § 3511.15 of this part.
----

----

I Comunicazioni

Commissione

----

Tassi di cambio dell'euro (1)

22 novembre 2005

(2005/C 290/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Fonte: tassi di cambio di riferimento pubblicati dalla Banca centrale europea.

----
----

Action brought on 5 September 2005 — De Soeten v Council

(Case T-336/05)

(2005/C 296/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Henders De Soeten (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant(s): Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant(s) claim(s) that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is a former official of the Council, who has been in retirement since 1 July 2004. She submitted an application for entitlement to the measure referred to in Article 9(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations, which enables the Appointing Authority, in the interests of the service and on the basis of objective criteria and transparent procedures introduced by means of general implementing provisions, not to apply the reduction in pension provided for in Article 9(1)(b) to officials leaving the service before the age of 63.

By her action, the applicant contests the decision refusing to grant her that benefit. She submits that one of the candidates who qualified for that measure was assigned to the same department. The applicant therefore takes the view that the requirements of the service were the same in both cases and asserts that the above mentioned article and the general implementing provisions adopted by the Council have been infringed, since both her length of service and her merits were greater than those of the other candidate.

In addition, the applicant alleges that the Council committed a manifest error of assessment in so far as it held that the assessment of the criterion of the requirements of the service meant that regard should be had to the individual qualities of officials.

----
----

----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  |                          |                                  |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|                  |                          |                                  |
| Dated: March 11, 2011 |                          |  /s/ Thomas J. Ferree       |
|                  | Name:                         | Thomas J. Ferree                      |
|                  | Title:                        | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
(No. 837

Claimant awarded $7,065.48.)

#### Cadet Knitting Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Franchise *tax*— when *refund may he made.*This case is similar to that of *Vulcanite Roofing Co.*v. *State, supra,*and the decision of the court in that case governs this claim.

Moran, Paltzer & O’Donnell, for claimant.

Oscar, E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Edward C. Fitch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for refund of certain portions of franchise taxes erroneously paid to the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois by above named claimant, in the years 1920 and 1921, total excess tax paid amounting to $7065.48.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the- State of Illinois is, as a matter of law, sustained.

On the grounds of social justice and equity, we award above named claimant the sum of $7065.48.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Scenic Views
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frank McGowan, Respondent. Michael J. Murphy, as Acting Industrial Commissioner, Appellant.

All concur.
### §6864. Termination of extended period for payment in case of carryback

**For termination of extensions of time for payment of income tax granted to corporations expecting carrybacks in case of jeopardy, see section 6164(h).**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 837.)
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr., certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Date: July 10, 2009



/s/ Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>
			
<ARTICLE>                                 5				
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS	
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    APR-30-1998
<CASH>                               65,667 
<SECURITIES>                        330,766 
<RECEIVABLES>                        12,206 
<ALLOWANCES>                          9,500
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    522,865 
<PP&E>                              936,235 
<DEPRECIATION>                      349,569 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,835,489 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               537,020 
<BONDS>                                   0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0 
<PREFERRED>                               0 
<COMMON>                             77,279 
<OTHER-SE>                        1,001,833 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,835,489 
<SALES>                              10,857 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     10,857 
<CGS>                                29,688 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        29,688 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,010,906 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    9,273 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,957,075)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,957,075)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0 
<CHANGES>                                 0 
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,957,075)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.37)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 (the Form 10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Dated: November 13, 2012             
|                                     
|/s/ DAVID WATSON                     
|David Watson                         
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### § 3420.6 Reoffer of tracts not sold in previous regional lease sales.

Following the offering of tracts in accordance with the procedures outlined in §§ 3420.2, 3420.3, 3420.4 and 3420.5, any tracts not sold in accordance with the above listed provisions may be reoffered for sale by the Department provided a lease sale schedule has been reviewed by the regional coal team and, after consultation with the Governor, adopted by the Secretary. Provisions of subpart 3422 shall apply to these tracts.

[48 FR 37655, Aug. 19, 1983]
Trafi Finnish Transport Safety Agency 

CERTIFICAITON OF 

RECIPROCITY 

Date 12 September 2014 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director 

Ind.No TRAFI 21782/ 03.02.00.00/2014 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20509 

Facsimile +1 202 267 5364 

brian.morris@faa.gov 

CERTIFICATION OF RECIPROCITY 

Dear Mr.Gretch, 

Ref OST-2006-24269 

The Finnish Transport Safety Agency hereby confirms that it will grant, on the basis 

of reciprocity, to any air carrier designated by the United States of America, the 

right to conduct third, fourth and fifth freedom traffic rights on scheduled or nonscheduled basis, which are in conformity with the Air Transport Agreement between 

the European Union and its Member States and the United States of America, 

signed on 25 and 30 April 2007 as amended by the provisionally applicable Protocol 

to Amend the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America and 

the European Community and Its Member States, signed on 24 June 2010. 

Finnish Transport Safety Agency • P.O. Box 320, Fl-00101 Helsinki, Finland 

Tel. +358 29 534 5000, fax +358 29 534 5095 • Business ID 1031715-9 

www.trafi.fi
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1998 FORM 10-Q OF ARGOSY GAMING COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           64301
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3971
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1882
<INVENTORY>                                       1312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 74681
<PP&E>                                          477228
<DEPRECIATION>                                   79216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  563026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            79822
<BONDS>                                         350000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           245
<OTHER-SE>                                       29947
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    563026
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                115700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   100049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   362
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (14292)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              15651
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2537)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
§ 9239.0-3 Authority. ( a ) Sections 9239.0-3 to 9239.7 are issued under the authority of R.S. 2478; 43 U.S.C. 1201.
( b ) In addition to liability for trespass on the public lands, as indicated in this part, persons responsible for such trespass may be prosecuted criminally under any applicable Federal law. Penalties are prescribed by the following statutes: ( 1 ) Timber trespass. 18 U.S.C. 1852, 1853.
( 2 ) Turpentine trespass. 18 U.S.C. 1854.
( 3 ) Coal trespass. 18 U.S.C. 1851; 30 U.S.C. 201(b)(4).
[35 FR 9800, June 13, 1970, as amended at 42 FR 4460, Jan. 25, 1977]
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00460-CR

CELESTINA LYNN GARCIA

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 16-12-29732-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 13, 2018
### Subpart C—Tax on Gross Transportation Income

Sec.
887.
Imposition of tax on gross transportation income of nonresident aliens and foreign corporations.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mario Migliori, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Richmond County, entered on the verdict of a jury, convicting him of a violation of section 1308 of the Penal Law (withholding stolen property), on which he was sentenced to imprisonment for not less than two years nor more than four years. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered. Throughout the trial, the assistant District Attorney transcended the bounds of legitimate cross-examination of the defendant and other witnesses. In his summation he misquoted evidence and improperly referred to the failure of the defendant’s counsel to make an opening statement. This conduct was not rendered innocuous by the corrective rulings of the court in some instances. It was the duty of the court, on its own motion, to intervene and prevent these continuous departures from the law. The defendant, therefore, did not have a fair trial. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32


**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**


**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of the
registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-KSB")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the registrant.





Date:
May 14, 2006





Amanasu
Environment Corporation





_____________________


/s/ Atsushi
Maki


President
and


Principal
Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Wickwire Spencer Steel Company v. Kemkit Scientific Corporation. George F. Picken, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Judgment Debtor.

Settle order on notice. Present— Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
§ 49.120 How will a bureau make a decision about a permit application? ( a ) The Federal land manager will evaluate the permit application and analyze impacts in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies.
( b ) The Federal land manager may issue a permit upon determining that: ( 1 ) The applicant possesses the qualifications required by § 49.110;
( 2 ) The permitted activity and any collection that would be made under the proposed permit would further paleontological knowledge, public education, or management of paleontological resources;
( 3 ) The permitted activity would be consistent with the purpose and management objectives defined for the Federal land;
( 4 ) The permitted activity would be conducted in a manner that would avoid or minimize adverse effects to significant natural or cultural resources; and
( 5 ) An approved repository has confirmed in writing that it is willing to accept the collection in accordance with the terms and conditions in the permit.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3938 — CRH/Quester)

(2005/C 240/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 15 September 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
#### Jasper, Lynch & Fishel, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Frieda Fingerhood et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.