alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          828617
<SECURITIES>                                   5416848
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1813235
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    2005408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              11334379
<PP&E>                                        11300081
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                43886091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         23310662
<BONDS>                                        1290871
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        683459
<OTHER-SE>                                    17616098
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  43886091
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              34390452
<CGS>                                         15607017
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 15607017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              17263125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              136352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2409600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    843360
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1566240
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1566240
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .024
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .024
        

</TABLE>
§ 30.248 How will the judge decide my petition for reopening? ( a ) The judge may summarily deny the petition for reopening based on deficiencies in the petition. A summary denial is an order in which the judge denies the petition without deciding the merits of the allegations in the petition and is warranted if: ( 1 ) The petition alleges mere disagreement with a decision;
( 2 ) The petition raises issues or objections that were previously addressed in a rehearing order or reopening order;
( 3 ) The petition raises only issues or objections by or on behalf of an interested party for the first time on reopening and that interested party received proper notice of the hearing or summary decision;
( 4 ) The petition is based on newly discovered evidence and fails to meet the requirements of § 30.238(e); or
( 5 ) The petition is based solely on issues or evidence described in § 30.247(c).
( b ) If a summary denial is not warranted, the judge will review the merits of the petition to determine if the petition asserts proper grounds for reopening. ( 1 ) If the petition fails to assert proper grounds for reopening, then the judge will issue an order denying the petition for reopening and addressing the merits of the petition.
( 2 ) If the petition asserts proper grounds for reopening, the judge will: ( i ) Cause copies of the petition and all papers filed by the petitioner to be served on those persons whose interest in the estate may be affected if the petition is granted;
( ii ) Allow all persons served a reasonable, specified time in which to respond to the petition for reopening by filing responses, cross-petitions, or briefs;
( iii ) Suspend further distribution of the estate or income during the reopening proceedings, if appropriate, by order to the affected agencies;
( iv ) Consider, with or without a hearing, the issues raised in the petition; and
( v ) Affirm, modify, or vacate the decision or order.
( c ) On entry of a final order, including a summary denial, the judge must distribute the order to the petitioner, the agencies, and the interested parties. The order must include a notice stating that interested parties who are adversely affected, or BIA, have the right to appeal the final order to the Board, within 30 days of the mailing date, and giving the Board's address.
[86 FR 72088, Dec. 20, 2021, as amended at 88 FR 39769, June 20, 2023]
(No. 1105

Claimant awarded $1,460.00.)

#### Carl Jones, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 29,*1927.

Respondeat *superior*— when *State not liable. State employee.*The doctrine of *Respondeat Superior*is not applicable to the State, and it is no.t liable for injuries sustained by its employees while in the performance of their duty.

Social justice and *equity*— award *may be made. Compensation aet.*An award may be made to an employee of the State who is injured while in the discharge of his duty, and compensation fixed under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation act.

Oscar J. Putting and W. E. Lindgren, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Merrill F. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The declaration filed by claimant on December 11, 1926, alleges that claimant on July 6, A. D. 1925, was an employee of the State of Illinois in the highway department at Springfield, Illinois, such employment being as a laborer at the *343Illinois State Fair Grounds, which employment was under the supervision and direction of Robert Abels, foreman of laborers ; that on said day and at said place, he was ordered and directed" by his foreman, Robert Abels, to saw certain stakes on a rip saw, which was located at the big barn at the northeast corner of the Illinois State Fair Grounds, Spring-field, Illinois; that while thus engaged in sawing stakes on said rip saw, the glove on his left hand caught in the saw, causing his left hand to be severely cut, bruised and lacerated and cutting off his first finger on said left hand; that he spent, to-wit, $300.00 endeavoring to be cured from said wounds, and he makes a claim for $2,000.00 from the State of Illinois.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois is sustained, as a matter of law.

From the testimony, it appears that claimant sustained a total permanent loss of the thumb and index finger on his left hand. While there is no legal liability on the part of the State of Illinois to make an award on account of the injuries to claimant, as a matter of equity and social justice, we award to claimant the sum which he would be entitled to receive were he employed under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the State of Illinois, or $200.00 hospital and doctor bills, and $1,260.00 for the total permanent loss of both thumb and index finger, or a total award of $1,460.00.
Adams. Kevin (OST)

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Hi All,

Adams, Kevin (OSn

Monday, November 18, 2013 8:23 AM

Aberdeen, City Attorney, Adam Altman; Aberdeen, City Manager, Lynn Lander;

Aberdeen, Julie Johnson; Aberdeen, Mayor, Mike Levsen; Aberdeen, Mike Wilson,

Airport Manager

SkyWest, Brad Rawson; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) .

Request for Comments re Essential Air Service at Aberdeen, SD

ABR_Octobe0013 _EAS_Bid.pdf

Attached above is a copy of the one timely-filed proposal for Essential Air Service lEAS) at Aberdeen, submitted by

A

kvWest, in response to Order 2013-10-2. We are currently reviewing that proposal. The attached proposal is directly

from the carrier and will soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regulations.gov at DOT-OST2011-0137, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding.

The next step in the carrier-selection process is for you to provide us with your community's comments, a critically

important element in our carrier-selection decision, especially the comments of civic officials. Accordingly, I ask that

everyone get back to us, preferably by email, no later than December 17, 2013. We will docket this email, as well as any

replies.

In brief, look at the proposal, and if you have any questions, call me, and get back to us by the deadline, December 17,

2013.

Best,

Kevin Adams

202-366-1047

'-. r-~~E~)

-- •• _~'>

(~~~~~

'" ,)

1
In the Matter of the Complaint for Exoneration 

from or Limitation of Liability by Jose Garcia, 

as owner of the 2019 40’ Beneteau Motor 

Yacht bearing Hull Identification No. 

BENER159L819,

Petitioner. 

___________________________________/ 

NOTICE TO CLAIMANTS OF COMPLAINT FOR 

EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 

Notice is given that the above-named Petitioner, JOSE GARCIA, has filed a Complaint, 

pursuant to 46 U.S.C. §30505 et. seq. for exoneration from or limitation of liability for all claims 

for any damages or injuries, arising out of or occurring as a result of an incident involving the 

2019 40’ Beneteau Motor Yacht bearing Hull Identification Number BENER159L819 on the 

navigable waters of the Miami River in Miami-Dade County, Florida, on or about March 8, 

2020, as more fully described in the Complaint. 

All persons having such claims must file their respective claims, as provided in 

Supplemental Rule F of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with the Clerk of this Court at the United States District 

Courthouse for the Southern District of Florida, 400 North Miami Avenue Miami, FL 33128 and 

must serve a copy thereof on attorneys for Petitioner on or before the 18th day of June, 2020 or 

be defaulted. 

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION 

“IN ADMIRALTY” 

CASE NO.: 20cv21859

Case 1:20-cv-21859-CMA Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2020 Page 1 of 2
If any claimant desires to contest either the right to Exoneration From or the right to 

Limitation of Liability he shall file and serve on the attorneys for Petitioner an answer to the 

complaint on or before the aforesaid date unless his claim has included an answer, so designated, 

or be defaulted.

DATED this 6___ day of _____May_________, 2020. 

___________________________________

Clerk of Court

cc: Craig P. Liszt, Esq.

Horr, Novak & Skipp, P.A.

Attorneys for Petitioner

Two Datran Center, Suite 1700

9130 South Dadeland Blvd.

Miami, Florida 33156

Telephone: 305-670-2525

Facsimile: 305-670-2526

Case 1:20-cv-21859-CMA Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2020 Page 2 of 2

C.Quinones

Case 1:20-cv-21859-CMA Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2020 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4978 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.4978

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the State offices 
                        of rural health program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``State Offices of Rural Health 
Program Reauthorization Act of 2022''.
SEC. 2. STATE OFFICES OF RURAL HEALTH.
    Section 338J(i)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254r(i)(1)) is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2018 through 2022'' 
and inserting ``fiscal years 2023 through 2027''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DANIEL FINGERHUT, DIGITAL 

PLATINUM, INC., DIGITAL 

PLATINUM, LTD., HUF MEDIYA 

(a.k.a HOOF MEDIA LTD.), TAL 

VALAROLA, and ITAY BARAK, 

Defendants, 

AICEL CARBONERO, 

 Relief Defendant. 

) 

)

) Case No.: 1:20-cv-21887-GAYLES

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 ) 

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT 

To: The Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida: 

Plaintiff United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”), by and 

through its attorneys, requests that the clerk of court enter default against Defendant Digital 

Platinum, Inc., pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) in the above-captioned matter 

for failure to answer, plead, or otherwise defend in a timely manner. In support of this request, 

the Commission relies upon the record in this case noting the Defendant was served on May 11, 

2020 and no response has been received. 

 

Case 1:20-cv-21887-DPG Document 139 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2020 Page 1 of 3
Dated: July 28, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

525 West Monroe Street, Suite 1100 

Chicago, Illinois 60661 

(312) 596-0714 facsimile 

(312) 596-0700 

/s/ Allison V. Passman 

Allison V. Passman 

Chief Trial Attorney 

Special Bar ID #A5502489 

apassman@cftc.gov 

Candice Haan 

Trial Attorney 

Special Bar ID #A5502564 

chaan@cftc.gov 

Case 1:20-cv-21887-DPG Document 139 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2020 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned, an attorney with Plaintiff Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 

hereby certifies that a true and accurate copy of Plaintiff’s MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT 

was served on all counsel of record via the CM/ECF system, and to the registered agent of Digital 

Platinum, Inc. as noted below. 

Digital Platinum, Inc. 

c/o Jay Passerino (registered agent) (jay.passerino@gmail.com) 

Email delivered June 27, 2020 

Dated: July 28, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/ Allison V. Passman 

 Chief Trial Attorney 

ONE OF THE ATTORNEYS FOR 

PLATINIFF COMMODITY 

FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

Case 1:20-cv-21887-DPG Document 139 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2020 Page 3 of 3
§ 423.29 Natural and cultural resources. ( a ) You must not destroy, injure, deface, remove, search for, disturb, or alter natural resources or cultural resources, including abandoned buildings or structures, on or in Reclamation facilities, lands, or waterbodies except in accordance with § 423.29(g) and other applicable Federal, State, and local laws.
( b ) You must not introduce wildlife, fish, or plants, including their reproductive bodies, into Reclamation lands and waterbodies.
( c ) You must not drop, place, throw, or roll rocks or other items inside, into, at, or down, caves, caverns, valleys, canyons, mountainsides, thermal features, or other natural formations.
( d ) You may bring firewood to or gather dead wood on Reclamation lands for fires as allowed under § 423.31. You must not damage or remove any live tree or part thereof except with proper authorization under 43 CFR part 429.
( e ) You must not walk on, climb, enter, ascend, descend, or traverse cultural resources on Reclamation lands, including monuments or statues, except as specifically allowed in special use areas designated by an authorized official under subpart E of this part 423.
( f ) You must not possess a metal detector or other geophysical discovery device, or use a metal detector or other geophysical discovery techniques to locate or recover subsurface objects or features on Reclamation lands, except: ( 1 ) When transporting, but not using, a metal detector or other geophysical discovery device in a vehicle on a public road as allowed under applicable Federal, State, and local law; or
( 2 ) As allowed by a permit issued pursuant to subpart D of this part 423.
( g ) You may engage in renewable natural resource gathering activities such as picking berries and mushrooms, collecting antlers, and other similar activities as regulated by this part 423 and other applicable Federal, State, and local laws.
§ 4700.0-6 Policy. ( a ) Wild horses and burros shall be managed as self-sustaining populations of healthy animals in balance with other uses and the productive capacity of their habitat.
( b ) Wild horses and burros shall be considered comparably with other resource values in the formulation of land use plans.
( c ) Management activities affecting wild horses and burros shall be undertaken with the goal of maintaining free-roaming behavior.
( d ) In administering these regulations, the authorized officer shall consult with Federal and State wildlife agencies and all other affected interests, to involve them in planning for and management of wild horses and burros on the public lands.
( e ) Healthy excess wild horses and burros for which an adoption demand by qualified individuals exists shall be made available at adoption centers for private maintenance and care.
( f ) Fees shall normally be required from qualified individuals adopting excess wild horses and burros to defray part of the costs of the adoption program.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Ranger Guided Tours - Slater Mill

Blackstone River Valley National Historical Park
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Tour Vanderbilt Mansion

Vanderbilt Mansion National Historic Site
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Badlands Ranger Programs

Badlands National Park
§ 3270.10 What types of geothermal operations are governed by these utilization regulations? ( a ) The regulations in subparts 3270 through 3279 of this part cover the permitting and operating procedures for the utilization of geothermal resources. This includes: ( 1 ) Electrical generation facilities;
( 2 ) Direct use facilities;
( 3 ) Related utilization facility operations;
( 4 ) Actual and allocated well field production and injection; and
( 5 ) Related well field operations.
( b ) The utilization regulations in subparts 3270 through 3279 do not address conducting exploration operations, which is covered in subpart 3250, or drilling wells intended for production or injection, which is covered in subpart 3260.
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

File Name: 09a0169p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________

DERRICK BELL,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

KURT JONES, Warden, Carson City

Correctional Facility,

 Respondent-Appellee.

X

-

-

-

-

>

,

-

-

-

-

N

No. 08-1775

Filed: May 12, 2009 

Before: MERRITT, MARTIN, and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges.

_________________

ORDER

_________________

Derrick Bell petitions for rehearing en banc of this court’s order entered January 6,

2009, by a single judge of this court denying his application for a certificate of appealability.

The petition was initially referred to a panel of three judges on which the original deciding

judge does not sit. After review of the petition, this panel composed of one active judge and

two senior judges issued an order announcing its conclusion that the original application was

properly denied. The petition was then circulated to all of the active judges of the court.

No active judge nor the senior judges of this panel having requested a vote on the

suggestion for an en banc rehearing, the panel now, pursuant to established court procedures,

denies the petition for rehearing en banc.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 /s/ Leonard Green

___________________________________

Clerk

1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,245.08

 2,245.32

 2,245.47

 2,245.57

 2,245.66

 2,245.77

 2,245.94

 2,246.16

 2,246.41

 2,246.57

 2,246.76

 2,247.51

 2,248.67

 2,249.24

 2,249.64

 2,249.94

 2,250.35

 2,251.49

 2,253.19

 2,254.52

 2,255.48

 2,256.07

 2,256.54

 2,257.09

 2,257.57

 2,258.05

 2,258.43

 2,258.75

 2,259.04

 2,259.32

 2,259.60

 913.4

 915.4

 916.7

 917.5

 918.3

 919.2

 920.6

 922.5

 924.6

 925.9

 927.5

 933.9

 943.7

 948.6

 952.0

 954.6

 958.2

 968.0

 982.9

 994.7

 1,003.2

 1,008.4

 1,012.7

 1,017.6

 1,021.9

 1,026.3

 1,029.7

 1,032.6

 1,035.3

 1,037.8

 1,040.4

STORAGE

+4.8

+2.0

+1.3

+0.8

+0.8

+0.9

+1.4

+1.9

+2.1

+1.3

+1.6

+6.3

+9.9

+4.9

+3.4

+2.6

+3.5

+9.9

+14.9

+11.7

+8.5

+5.3

+4.2

+4.9

+4.3

+4.3

+3.4

+2.9

+2.6

+2.6

+2.6

CHANGE

2,794

1,360

923

743

728

737

1,005

1,217

1,304

1,078

1,214

3,544

5,327

2,780

1,998

1,587

2,085

5,278

7,754

6,201

4,314

2,927

2,386

2,772

2,656

2,338

2,026

1,750

1,576

1,541

1,566

INFLOW

 359

 347

 285

 321

 343

 268

 287

 282

 242

 398

 399

 342

 348

 310

 258

 282

 297

 287

 253

 282

 0

 262

 258

 30

 291

 150

 284

 273

 240

 251

 272

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 247

 178

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 0

 5

 0

 5

 5

 0

 2

 0

 0

 7

 2

 0

 10

 8

 5

 3

 8

 8

 0

 13

 11

 3

 5

 3

 3

 3

 11

 8

 0

 5

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .01

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .05

 .04

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .02

INCHES

 1.20

 .25

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .22

 .09

 .01

 .77

 .91

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .61

 1.89

 1.49

 1.19

 .15

 .15

 .21

 .52

 .64

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .01

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2010 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 1, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +131.6 75,509 8,501 0 426 133 .51 10.48

ACRE-FEET +131,600 149,772 16,862 0 845 264

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 16,862

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 845

 17,707

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 10.48

JULY 1, 2009 19.28

 908.6

(1) (1)
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# East Point Loop Road

Aleutian Islands World War II National Historic Area