alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4750.2-1 Health and identification requirements. ( a ) An individual determined to be qualified by the authorized officer shall verify each excess animal's soundness and good health, determine its age and sex, and administer immunizations, worming compounds, and tests for communicable diseases.
( b ) Documentation conforming compliance with State health inspection and immunization requirements for each wild horse or burro shall be provided to each adopter by the authorized officer.
( c ) Each animal offered for private maintenance, including orphan and unweaned foals, shall be individually identified by the authorized officer with a permanent freeze mark of alpha numeric symbols on the left side of its neck. The freeze mark identifies the animal as Federal property subject to the provisions of the Act and these regulations by a patented symbol, the animal's year of birth, and its individual identification number. The authorized officer shall record the freeze mark on the documentation of health and immunizations. For purposes of this subpart, a freeze mark applied by the authorized officer is not considered a brand.
§ 8365.1-4 Public health, safety and comfort. ( a ) No person shall cause a public disturbance or create a risk to other persons on public lands by engaging in activities which include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Making unreasonable noise;
( 2 ) Creating a hazard or nuisance;
( 3 ) Refusing to disperse, when directed to do so by an authorized officer;
( 4 ) Resisting arrest or issuance of citation by an authorized officer engaged in performance of official duties; interfering with any Bureau of Land Management employee or volunteer engaged in performance of official duties; or
( 5 ) Assaulting, committing a battery upon, or
( 6 ) Knowingly giving any false or fraudulent report of an emergency situation or crime to any Bureau of Land Management employee or volunteer engaged in the performance of official duties.
( b ) No person shall engage in the following activities on the public lands: ( 1 ) Cultivating, manufacturing, delivering, distributing or trafficking a controlled substance, as defined in 21 U.S.C. 802(6) and 812 and 21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15, except when distribution is made by a licensed practitioner in accordance with applicable law. For the purposes of this paragraph, delivery means the actual, attempted or constructive transfer of a controlled substance whether or not there exists an agency relationship; or
( 2 ) Possessing a controlled substance, as defined in 21 U.S.C. 802(6) and 812 and 21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15, unless such substance was obtained, either directly or pursuant to a valid prescription or order or as otherwise allowed by Federal or State law, by the possessor from a licensed practitioner acting in the course of professional practice.
[48 FR 36384, Aug. 10, 1983; 48 FR 52058, Nov. 16, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 21624, May 19, 1989]
#### Patrick McCabe, Appellant, v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent.

Under the proofs in this case the questions of plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence and defendant’s negligence were questions for the jury. Judgment of the County Court of Kings county reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 16, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00331

- CR

Fernando TORRES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR1546W Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the criminal case is a plea

- bargain case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Proc edure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record

under these rules.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal will be dismissed p ursuant to rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant causes an amended trial court certification to be filed by July 15, 2015 , showing appellant has the right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. St ate , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State ,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification issue.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to §906 of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned President and chief executive officer of First Republic Preferred Capital
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 (the Form 10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES J. BAUMBERGER                     
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  James J. Baumberger                     
|                     |  |  |  | Title:    President and chief executive officer
§ 6102.3 Restoration. ( a ) The BLM must emphasize restoration on the public lands to achieve its multiple use and sustained yield mandate.
( b ) In determining the restoration actions required to achieve recovery of ecosystems and promote resilience, the BLM must consider the causes of degradation, the recovery potential of the ecosystem, and the allowable uses in the governing land use plan, such as whether an area is managed for recreation or is degraded land prioritized for development. The BLM must then develop commensurate restoration goals and objectives (*see* § 6103.1.1).
( c ) The BLM should employ management actions to promote restoration. Over the long-term, restoration actions must be durable, self-sustaining, and expected to persist in a manner that supports land health and ecosystem resilience.
( d ) When designing and implementing restoration actions on public lands, including authorizing restoration leases, authorized officers must adhere to the following principles: ( 1 ) Ensure that restoration actions address causes of degradation, focus on process-based solutions, and where possible maintain attributes and resource values associated with the potential or capability of the ecosystem;
( 2 ) Ensure that actions are designed, implemented, and monitored at appropriate spatial and temporal scales using suitable treatments and tools to achieve desired outcomes;
( 3 ) Coordinate and implement actions across BLM programs, with partners, and in consideration of existing uses to develop holistic restoration actions;
( 4 ) Ensure incorporation of locally appropriate best management practices, high-quality information, and adaptive management that supports restoration;
( 5 ) Identify opportunities to implement nature-based or low-tech restoration activities and use seed from native plants; and
( 6 ) Consult with Tribes to identify opportunities for co-stewardship or collaboration (*see* § 6102.5(b)(4) through (6)).
#### Max Miller and Another, Appellants, v. Nathan Nesselowitz, Constable, etc., and Others, Respondents.

Motion denied, on condition that plaintiffs perfect the appeal, place the case on the June calendar, and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with costs. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hike the Confluence Trail

Dinosaur National Monument
### §7501. Liability for taxes withheld or collected

#### (a) General rule

Whenever any person is required to collect or withhold any internal revenue tax from any other person and to pay over such tax to the United States, the amount of tax so collected or withheld shall be held to be a special fund in trust for the United States. The amount of such fund shall be assessed, collected, and paid in the same manner and subject to the same provisions and limitations (including penalties) as are applicable with respect to the taxes from which such fund arose.

#### (b) Penalties

**For penalties applicable to violations of this section, see sections 6672 and 7202.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 895.)
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Drive to Williams Ranch

Guadalupe Mountains National Park
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     JACKAL INDUSTRIES, INC.  June 30, 1997  financial  statements and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894538
<NAME>                        JACKAL INDUSTRIES, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from Ultronics  Corporation June 30, 2000 financial statements
                  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such
                  financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                0000894556
<NAME>                               Ultronics Corporation
<CURRENCY>                           US



<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                      1.00

<CASH>                                                11,202
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        11,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                            5,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          11,202
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         2,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (2,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (2,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (2,446)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .00



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John J. Rodgers v. Calvin Tomkins, as Commissioner.

Motion to dismiss writ granted, without costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 14, 2018

s0213 

# Order

Clerk February 14, 2018

157076

- 7(32)

In re B.B. BARTLETT, Minor. SC: 157076

COA: 341781

Kalamazoo CC Family Div:

2014

- 000071

- NA

_________________________________________/

In re BARTLETT, Minors. SC: 157077

COA: 341782

Allegan CC Family Div:

2013

- 051776

- NA

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 2,

2018 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
### **Subchapter C—Taxable Amount**

Sec.
2621.
Taxable amount in case of taxable distribution.
2622.
Taxable amount in case of taxable termination.
2623.
Taxable amount in case of direct skip.
2624.
Valuation.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XIV, §1431(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2720, substituted "Taxable Amount" for "Administration" in subchapter heading, substituted "Taxable amount in case of taxable distribution" for "Administration" in item 2621 and "Taxable amount in case of taxable termination" for "Regulations" in item 2622, and added items 2623 and 2624.
§ 45.33 Under what circumstances may the ALJ be disqualified? ( a ) The ALJ may withdraw from a case at any time the ALJ deems himself or herself disqualified.
( b ) At any time before issuance of the ALJ's decision, any party may move that the ALJ disqualify himself or herself for personal bias or other valid cause. ( 1 ) The party must file the motion promptly after discovering facts or other reasons allegedly constituting cause for disqualification.
( 2 ) The party must file with the motion an affidavit or declaration setting forth the facts or other reasons in detail.
( c ) The ALJ must rule upon the motion, stating the grounds for the ruling. ( 1 ) If the ALJ concludes that the motion is timely and meritorious, he or she must disqualify himself or herself and withdraw from the case.
( 2 ) If the ALJ does not disqualify himself or herself and withdraw from the case, the ALJ must continue with the hearing process and issue a decision.
### PART III—DEFINITIONS

Sec.
761.
Terms defined.
### **Subchapter B—Combined Benefit Fund**

Part
I.
Establishment and Benefits.
II.
Financing.
III.
Enforcement.
IV.
Other Provisions.
### §6117. Cross reference

**For inspection of records, returns, etc., concerning gasoline or lubricating oils, see section 4102.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 756, §6109; renumbered §6110, Pub. L. 87–397, §1(a), Oct. 5, 1961, 75 Stat. 828; renumbered §6111 and amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XII, §1201(a), title XIX, §1906(a)(8), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1660, 1824; renumbered §6112, renumbered §6113, Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §§141(a), 142(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 677, 681; renumbered §6114, Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10701(a), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–457; renumbered §6115, Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1012(aa)(5)(A), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3532; renumbered §6116, Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13173(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 456; renumbered §6117, Pub. L. 112–41, title V, §502(a), Oct. 21, 2011, 125 Stat. 460.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455, among other changes, substituted in section catchline "Cross reference" for "Cross references" and struck out in text reference to section 4876, relating to reports of Secretary of Agriculture concerning cotton futures, reference to section 4773, relating to inspection of returns, order forms, and prescriptions concerning narcotics and marihuana, and reference to section 4775 relating to authority of Secretary or his delegate to furnish list of special taxpayers.
#### § 429.15 Is Reclamation required to issue a use authorization?

No. The issuance of a use authorization is at Reclamation's discretion. At a minimum, the criteria listed at § 429.14 must be considered prior to issuance of any use authorizations. Not all requests will be authorized. If issued, Reclamation will provide only the least estate, right, or possessory interest needed to accommodate the approved use.
#### § 4.622 When may I file a reply?

Within 15 days after service of an answer, you may file a reply. If your reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, you must include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 4.624.
ISAAC WILSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3492

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 15, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Terry P. Lewis , Judge

.

Michael J. Titus, Assista nt Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, and Isaac Wilson, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE

, KELSEY

, and JAY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
### §5504. Operation

#### (a) General

Any manufacturer of vinegar qualified under this part may, under such regulations as the Secretary shall prescribe, separate by a vaporizing process the distilled spirits from the mash produced by him, and condense the vapor by introducing it into the water or other liquid used in making vinegar in his plant.

#### (b) Removals

No person shall remove, or cause to be removed, from any plant established under this part any vinegar or other fluid or material containing a greater proportion than 2 percent of proof spirits.

#### (c) Records

Every person manufacturing vinegar by the vaporizing process shall keep such records and file such reports as the Secretary shall by regulations prescribe of the kind and quantity of materials received on his premises and fermented or mashed, the quantity of low wines produced, the quantity of such low wines used in the manufacture of vinegar, the quantity of vinegar produced, the quantity of vinegar removed from the premises, and such other information as may by regulations be required. Such records, and a copy of such reports, shall be preserved as regulations shall prescribe, and shall be kept available for inspection by any internal revenue officer during business hours.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1391; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those comprising subsecs. (a) and (b) of this section were contained in prior section 5216(a)(1)(2), act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 640, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Subsecs. (a), (c). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.
#### Elias Jacobson, Respondent, v. James Strong, Jr., and John Strong, Copartners, etc., Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 1st day of December, 1914, denying a motion to change the place of trial.

Per Curiam:

The whole transaction out of which this action arose took place in Suffolk county, and, so far as appeal's, all the witnesses who can testify to facts relevant to the issue reside there. The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.