alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Latin American Telecommunications
      Venture Company - LATVCO. (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
      May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Calabro **,
      Chief Financial Officer** ,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/
      Thomas Calabro





Chief
      Financial Officer


July
      30,
      2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in the typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to IGIA, Inc. and will be retained by IGIA,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
### §533. Evidence of purpose to avoid income tax

#### (a) Unreasonable accumulation determinative of purpose

For purposes of section 532, the fact that the earnings and profits of a corporation are permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business shall be determinative of the purpose to avoid the income tax with respect to shareholders, unless the corporation by the preponderance of the evidence shall prove to the contrary.

#### (b) Holding or investment company

The fact that any corporation is a mere holding or investment company shall be prima facie evidence of the purpose to avoid the income tax with respect to shareholders.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 179.)
### NUM BER 13-0 9-00 527- CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ CA RL OS P ENA, A pp ellan t, v . J. T ODD B OYD A ND R UB Y B OYD , A pp ellees
.

____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ On a p p ea l f ro m th e C o u n ty C o u rta t L awN o . 2 of C amero n Co un ty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ju stice s Yañ ez, R od rigu ez, an d Garza M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t per

fected an appeal from a jud g ment ent ered by the Cou nty

C our t atLaw No. 2 of C amero n C ounty , Texas, i n c ause number 2008- CC L- 1294- B. Appel lan t hasfil ed an unop posed moti on to di smi ss the appeal on g ro unds thatthe par ti es hav e reache d an2

agreem entto settle and comp romise t heir dif feren ces. A ppe llant requests tha t this Court dis mis s t he appe al w it h preju dic e. The Cou rt , h a vi ng co nsi dered th e doc uments on fil e and appel lan t’ s u noppos ed moti on to di smi ss the appeal , i s o f the opini on that the motion s houl d be g ra nted. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( a)
. Appel lan t’ s mot ion to d ism is s i s g ra nted, and the a ppeal i s h ereby DI SM ISSE D W ITH PR EJU DI CE
. In acco rd ance w it h the agreement of the par ti es, co sts a re t a x e d a g a i n s t t h e p a rty i n c u r r i ng sa me. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( d)( "Abse nt ag re ement of

the par ti es, the cour

t w il l tax costsagai nstthe appel lan t.")
. Hav ing di smi ss ed the a p p e a l at ap pel lan t' s req uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h.
PERC UR IAM Del ivered and filed the 1 st day

of Apr il , 201 0.
EX-10.7





 Exhibit 10.7 

AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO 

XOMETRY, INC. 

2016 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

A.    XOMETRY, INC., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware (the “Company”) established the Company’s 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Plan”); 

B.     The Plan currently provides for an aggregate of 4,409,816 shares of Common Stock to be reserved for issuance
under the Plan; and 
 C.    The Company now wishes to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of Common
Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan to an aggregate of 5,694,149 shares. 
 Effective immediately, Section 3(a)(i) of the Plan
is amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 1.    Effective immediately, Section 3(a)(i) of the Plan is
amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 “Subject to Section 9(a) relating to Capitalization
Adjustments, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Stock Awards from and after the Effective Date will not exceed 5,694,149 shares (the
“Share Reserve”), which number includes the sum of (x) 1,363,826 shares available for issuance under the Prior Plan as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern time on the Effective Date plus (y) such
number of shares, up to a maximum of 271,100 shares of Common Stock, subject to outstanding stock awards granted under the Prior Plan as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern time on the Effective Date that (1) expire or terminate for any reason prior to
exercise or settlement or without all shares covered by such award having been issued; (2) are forfeited, cancelled or otherwise returned to the Company because of the failure to meet a contingency or condition required to vest such shares; or
(3) are reacquired, repurchased or withheld (or not issued) to satisfy a tax withholding obligation in connection with an award or to satisfy the purchase price or exercise price of a stock award (such shares, the “Returning
Shares”), as and to the extent such Returning Shares become available from time to time.” 
 2.    In
all other respects the Plan will remain the same. 
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 












 I hereby certify that the foregoing amendment to the Plan was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Company as of March 26, 2021. 
  

	
	 /s/ Laurence Zuriff

	Randolph Altschuler
	Chief Executive Officer


 * * * * 

I hereby certify that the foregoing amendment to the Plan was duly approved by the Stockholders of the Company as of March 26, 2021. 

 

	
	 /s/ Laurence Zuriff

	Randolph Altschuler
	Chief Executive Officer
### §5662. Penalty for alteration of wine labels

Any person who, without the permission of the Secretary, so alters as to materially change the meaning of any mark, brand, or label required to appear upon any wine upon its removal from premises subject to the provisions of subchapter F, or from customs custody, or who, after such removal, represents any wine, whether in its original containers or otherwise, to be of an identity or origin other than its proper identity or origin as shown by such stamp, mark, brand, or label, or who, directly or indirectly, and whether by manner of packaging or advertising or any other form of representation, represents any still wine to be an effervescent wine or a substitute for an effervescent wine, shall be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both, for each such offense.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1407; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1905(b)(2)(D), 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1822, 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5662, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 695, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" and "stamp," before "mark,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by section 1905(b)(2)(D) of Pub. L. 94–455 effective on first day of first month which begins more than 90 days after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1905(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 5005 of this title.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


        
<CAPTION>
<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information
                  extracted from  Millenium Istec Inc.'s September 30, 1998
                  financial statements  and is qualified  in its  entirety
                  by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<CIK>                    0000894551
<NAME>                   Millenium Istec Inc.

       

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEPT-30-1998
<CASH>                                                        1407
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                12849
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                  18419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             38690
<PP&E>                                                       42471
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (4273)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              890717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       633231
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                      4000
<OTHER-SE>                                                  205559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                890717
<SALES>                                                      53413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             53413
<CGS>                                                        27190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                27190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            318250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           15730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (309333)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (309333)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (309333)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.08)

        

</TABLE>
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route
National Historic Trail
MA, RI, CT, NY, NJ, PA, DE, MD, VA, DC


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Washington-Rochambeau National Historic Trail
 Last updated: March 31, 2012
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: Washington-Rochambeau National Historic Trail
1400 North Outer Line Drive
King of Prussia,
PA
19406
 Phone: 610-783-1006
Washington-Rochambeau National Historic Trail Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### § 3861.3-1 Extent of duties.

The duty of a mineral surveyor in any particular case ceases when he has executed the survey and returned the field notes and preliminary plat, with his report, to the cadastral engineer. He will not be allowed to prepare for the mining claimant the papers in support of his application for patent. He is not permitted to combine the duties of surveyor and notary public in the same case by administering oaths. It is preferable that both preliminary and final oaths of assistants should be taken before some officer duly authorized to administer oaths, other than the mineral surveyor. In cases, however, where great delay, expense, or inconvenience would result from a strict compliance with this section, the mineral surveyor is authorized to administer the necessary oaths to his assistants, but in each case where this is done, he will submit to the proper cadastral engineer a full written report of the circumstances which required his stated action; otherwise he must have absolutely nothing to do with the case, except in his official capacity as surveyor. He will not employ field assistants interested therein in any manner.
### §90. Illegal Federal irrigation subsidies

#### (a) General rule

Gross income shall include an amount equal to any illegal Federal irrigation subsidy received by the taxpayer during the taxable year.

#### (b) Illegal Federal irrigation subsidy

For purposes of this section—

#### (1) In general

The term "illegal Federal irrigation subsidy" means the excess (if any) of—

(A) the amount required to be paid for any Federal irrigation water delivered to the taxpayer during the taxpayer year, over

(B) the amount paid for such water.

#### (2) Federal irrigation water

The term "Federal irrigation water" means any water made available for agricultural purposes from the operation of any reclamation or irrigation project referred to in paragraph (8) of section 202 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.

#### (c) Denial of deduction

No deduction shall be allowed under this subtitle by reason of any inclusion in gross income under subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10611(a), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–451.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 202 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is classified to section 390bb of Title 43, Public Lands.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10611(c), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–452, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall apply to water delivered to the taxpayer in months beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 22, 1987]."
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 5, 2015. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00641

- CV
DEANGELO P. BOSTON , Appellant V. DARRELL D. BUTLER , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 15

- 02064

- E



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justice s Lang

- Miers and Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment. On May 18, 2015, appellant filed an affidavit of indigence in the trial court. The Dallas County Clerk’s May 18,

2015 contest to the affidavit of indigence was sustained by written order on May 28, 2015. By letter dated May 1 9, 2015, we directed appellant to pay the $195 f i ling fee for the appeal. By letter dated July 15, 2015, the Court notified appellant that the Dallas County Clerk had informed us appellant had not paid or made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record. Appellant has not responded to either letter, the filing fee has not been paid, and the clerk’s record has not been

filed.– 2

– Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b),
42.3(c).

150641F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

DEANGELO P. BOSTON, Appellant

No. 05

- 15

- 00641

- CV V.
DARRELL D. BUTLER, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 15

- 02064

- E. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Lang

- Miers and Stoddart participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of prosecution. We ORDER that appellee Darrell D. Butler recover his costs of this appeal from appellant Deangelo P. Boston.

Judgment entered this 5th day of August, 2015.
#### § 4710.3 Management areas.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNASA/DOD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project. Paper 20: Engineers as information processors: A survey of US aerospace engineering faculty and studentsU.S. aerospace engineering faculty and students were surveyed as part of the NASA/DoD Aerospace Knowledge Research Project. Faculty and students were viewed as information processors within a conceptual framework of information seeking behavior. Questionnaires were received from 275 faculty members and 640 students, which were used to determine: (1) use and importance of information sources; (2) use of specific print sources and electronic data bases; (3) use of information technology; and (4) the influence of instruction on the use of information sources and the products of faculty and students. Little evidence was found to support the belief that instruction in library or engineering information use has significant impact either on broadening the frequency or range of information products and sources used by U.S. aerospace engineering students.Document ID19920018912Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsHolland, Maurita Peterson*(Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst. Troy, NY., United States)*Pinelli, Thomas E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Barclay, Rebecca O.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Kennedy, John M.*(Indiana Univ. Bloomington., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryDocumentation And Information ScienceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107928NAS 1.15:107928Accession Number92N28155Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-1682Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920018912.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a) I, Ron E. Hooper, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Williams Coal
Seam Gas Royalty Trust, for which Bank of America, N.A., acts as Trustee; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust
corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), or
for causing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for
the registrant and I have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this quarterly report my conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation;c)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors:  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and Page 23




---



##### 



b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and In giving the certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, I have relied to the
extent I consider reasonable on information provided to me by Williams
Production Company. Date: August 9, 2004 By:
    /s/ RON E. HOOPERRon E. HooperSenior Vice President and Administrator
Bank of America, N.A. Page 24
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Pollinators
all_density.xls 3/22/00 12:55 PM

Winter Run Loss - Not Clipped

2000

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1/1/00 1/6/00 1/11/00 1/16/00 1/21/00 1/26/00 1/31/00

Loss - Not Clipped

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Pumping X 100 af

SWP Loss CVP Loss SWP Pumping Total Pumping 3-Day Average Loss