alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4.5 Power of the Secretary and Director. ( a ) *Secretary.* Nothing in this part shall be construed to deprive the Secretary of any power conferred upon the Secretary by law. The authority reserved to the Secretary includes, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) The authority to take jurisdiction at any stage of any case before any employee or employees of the Department, including any administrative law judge or board of the Office, and render the final decision in the matter after holding such hearing as may be required by law; and
( 2 ) The authority to review any decision of any employee or employees of the Department, including any administrative law judge or board of the Office, or to direct any such employee or employees to reconsider a decision.
( b ) Pursuant to his delegated authority from the Secretary, the Director may assume jurisdiction of any case before any board of the Office or review any decision of any board of the Office or direct reconsideration of any decision by any board of the Office. The Director may issue Standing Orders to convey current information to parties and the public. This includes, but is not limited to, the OHA Standing Orders on Contact Information and the OHA Standing Orders on Electronic Transmission to convey information related to electronic transmission, including filing and service. OHA Standing Orders may be issued related to emergency or other contingency. OHA Standing Orders are available on the Department of the Interior OHA website.
( c ) *Exercise of reserved power.* If the Secretary or Director assumes jurisdiction of a case or reviews a decision, the parties and the appropriate Departmental personnel will be advised in writing of such action, the administrative record will be requested, and, after the review process is completed, a written decision will be issued.
[50 FR 43705, Oct. 29, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 46355, Dec. 7, 1987; 52 FR 47097, Dec. 11, 1987; 88 FR 5792, Jan. 30, 2023]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

t0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146572

KRZYSTOF OBRZUT and EWA OBRZUT,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 146572

COA: 306382 

Wayne CC: 10-014145-CK

POLISH DELI & BAKERY, INC., POLISH

MARKET, DANUTA KOLYNICZ, and

MAREK KOLYNICZ,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Dr. David F. Hostelley, President and Chief Financial Officer of Auto-Q
International, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the period ended
September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 18, 2005

/s/ Dr. David F. Hostelley
--------------------------
Dr. David F. Hostelley
President and Chief Financial Officer
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to this park navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to this park information section
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Sunset Crater Volcano
National MonumentArizona
§ 107.400 Changes in ownership of 10 percent or more of Licensee but no change of Control. ( a ) *Prior approval requirements.* You must obtain SBA's prior written approval for any proposed transfer or issuance of ownership interests that results in the ownership (beneficial or of record) by any Person, or group of Persons acting in concert, of at least 10 percent of any class of your stock or partnership capital.
( b ) *Fee.* A processing fee of $200 must accompany each such request for approval of a change of ownership.
----

----

III Közlemények

Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatal

----

PÁLYÁZATI FELHÍVÁS A KÖZÖSSÉGI NÖVÉNYFAJTA-HIVATAL FELLEBBEZÉSI TANÁCSA TAGSÁGI POSZTJAINAK BETÖLTÉSÉRE

(2005/C 305 A/01)

A Hivatal és fellebbezési tanácsa

A Közösségi Növényfajta-hivatalt (a továbbiakban: a Hivatal) a közösségi növényfajta-oltalmi jogokról szóló, 1994. július 27-i 2100/94/EK tanácsi rendelet (HL L 227., 1994.9.1., 1. o.) hozta létre.

A Hivatal jogi személyiséggel rendelkező és jogi, igazgatási és pénzügyi szempontból önálló közösségi szerv, amelynek feladata a közösségi növényfajta-oltalmi jogok – azaz az új növényfajtákra vonatkozó ipari tulajdonjog meghatározott formái – közösségi rendszerének igazgatása. A Hivatal különösen ezeknek a jogoknak a megadásáról dönt, amelyek az egész Közösség területén egységes védelmet biztosítanak. A Hivatal székhelye a franciaországi Angers-ban található.

Az 1239/95/EK bizottsági rendelet (HL L 121., 1995.6.1., 37. o.) létrehozott egy fellebbezési tanácsot. Ennek feladata a Hivatal határozatai ellen benyújtott fellebbezések elbírálása, vagyis a döntés a közösségi növényfajta-védelemi jogok megadásáról vagy megadásuk elutasításáról, a kifogásokról, a közösségi növényfajta-védelemi jogok semmisségéről vagy megszűnéséről, illetve a kötelező engedélyek kiadásáról vagy megtagadásáról.

A fellebbezési tanács egy elnökből és két másik tagból áll, továbbá két póttaggal egészülhet ki.

A feladatok leírása

A felvett tag (N/F) a fellebbezési tanács hatáskörén belül tevékenykedik, tehát ellátja az előadói feladatokat, ha erre kijelölik.

Kinevezés

A megfelelő képzettséggel rendelkező tagok (N/F), az elnök és helyettese kivételével, szerepelnek azon a jegyzéken, amelyet a Hivatal javaslatára a Hivatal igazgatási tanácsa öt évre készít.

A fellebbezési tanács tagjai függetlenek. A határozathozatal során semmiféle utasítást nem kell követniük. A Hivatalban nem tölthetnek be egyéb posztot.

Alkalmazási feltételek

A tagok (N/F) folytathatják szakmai tevékenységeiket.

A tagokat (N/F) a fellebbezési tanács elnöke választja ki a jegyzékből oly módon, hogy a tanács az esetektől függően szükséges 3–5 tagból álljon.

A kiválasztott tagok (N/F) részmunkaidőben dolgoznak a Hivatalban. A naptári évnek legalább tíz napján rendelkezésre kell állniuk.

Az igazgatási tanács 2003. március 26-i határozata az előadónak kijelölt tag javadalmazását esetenként 1 600 euróban, a többi tagét vagy tagokét pedig esetenként 800 euróban határozza meg. Ezeket az összegeket tagonként 400 euróval kell kiegészíteni az Angers-ba és az Angers-ból történő utazásra fordított idő ellentételezésére.

Szakképzettség

A pályázatok benyújtása

A pályázatokat részletes és lehetőleg angol nyelvre lefordított önéletrajzzal együtt legkésőbb 2006. január 15-ig (ez a postára adás határideje, vagyis a bélyegzőn szereplő dátum) kell benyújtani a következő címre:

Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO/OCVV)Secretariat of the Board of AppealBP 62141FR-49021 Angers Cedex 02

További információk ugyanezen a címen vagy telefaxon (+33 241 25 64 10) és e-mailen (doreau@cpvo.eu.int) kérhetők.

----
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 1 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 2 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 3 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 4 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 5 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 6 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 7 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 8 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 9 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 10 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 11 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 12 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 13 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 14 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 15 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61053-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2020 Page 16 of 16
CD Containing CAMx 2005 Base Year Model Performance Statistics 

EPA has placed in the Transport Rule docket a CD containing model performance statistics for 

the CAMx v5.30 2005as base year model simulation. There are three folders on this CD. 

The folders and their contents are as follows: 

CAMx 2005as_PM2.5_qtr_rpo_stats: statistics for PM2.5 component species for each of four 

subregions and by monitoring site for each quarter of the year; 

CAMx 2005as_O3_qtr_rpo_stats: statistics for 8-hour daily maximum ozone for each of four 

subregion and by monitoring site for each quarter of the year; and 

CAMx 2005as_O3 season_rpo_stats_60: statistics calculated for observations > 60 ppb for the 

ozone season (defined as May through September) for each of four subregions and by monitoring 

site. 

The subregions for which we calculated model performance statistics include the Northeast, 

Southeast, Midwest, and Central states. 

These subregions are defined based upon the states included in the following Regional Planning 

Organizations (RPOs): 

manevu = Northeast 

vistas = Southeast 

mwrpo = Midwest 

cenrap = Central states 

Each folder contains a README file which describes the specific contents of that folder. 

Information on the calculation of the model performance statistics and the analysis and 

interpretation of results can be found in the Air Quality Modeling Technical Support Document 

for the Final Transport Rule, Appendix A. A copy of this document can be obtained from the 

Transport Rule docket.
#### § 4.1191 Answer.

The permittee shall have 30 days from receipt of the order within which to file an answer with the Hearings Division, OHA.

[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 88 FR 5795, Jan. 30, 2023]
#### Erna H. Fischer, as Administratrix of the Estate of Ernest Hoppe, Deceased, Respondent, v. New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant; Walter G. Williams et al., Doing Business under the Name of Williams Lake, Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Hefliernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 135.]
§ 4.1363 Contents of request; amendment of request; responses. ( a ) The request for review shall include— ( 1 ) A clear statement of the facts entitling the one requesting review to administrative relief;
( 2 ) An explanation of each specific alleged error in OSMRE's decision, including reference to the statutory and regulatory provisions allegedly violated;
( 3 ) A request for specific relief;
( 4 ) A statement whether the person requests or waives the opportunity for an evidentiary hearing; and
( 5 ) Any other relevant information.
( b ) All interested parties shall file an answer or motion in response to a request for review, or a statement that no answer or motion will be filed, within 15 days of receipt of the request specifically admitting or denying facts or alleged errors stated in the request and setting forth any other matters to be considered on review.
( c ) A request for review may be amended once as a matter of right prior to filing of an answer or motion or statement filed in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. Thereafter, a motion for leave to amend the request shall be filed with the Administrative Law Judge. An Administrative Law Judge may not grant a motion for leave to amend unless all parties agree to an extension of the date of commencement of the hearing under § 4.1364. A request for review may not be amended after a hearing commences.
( d ) An interested party shall have 10 days from filing of a request for review that is amended as a matter of right or the time remaining for response to the original request, whichever is longer, to file an answer, motion, or statement in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. If the Administrative Law Judge grants a motion to amend a request for review, the time for an interested party to file an answer, motion, or statement shall be set forth in the order granting it.
( e ) Failure of any party to comply with the requirements of paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may be regarded by an Administrative Law Judge as a waiver by that party of the right to commencement of a hearing within 30 days of the filing of a request for review if the Administrative Law Judge concludes that the failure was substantial and that another party was prejudiced as a result.
[56 FR 2143, Jan. 22, 1991; 56 FR 5061, Feb. 7, 1991]
§ 3517.15 How do I apply for approval of one of these agreements? No specific form is required. Submit three copies of your application to the BLM office with jurisdiction over some or all of the lands in which you are interested. Include the following information: ( a ) Copies of the contract or other agreement affecting the Federal hardrock mineral leases or permits, or both;
( b ) A statement showing the nature and reason for your request;
( c ) A statement showing all the interests held in the area of the agreement by the designated contractor; and
( d ) The proposed or agreed upon plan of operation for development of the leased lands.
### §4117. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for grants under this subchapter such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2013. This section shall take effect on October 26, 1996.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title I, §108, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4030; Pub. L. 107–292, §2(a), Nov. 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 2053; Pub. L. 110–411, title VII, §701(a), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4334.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–411 substituted "2009 through 2013" for "1998 through 2007".

2002—Pub. L. 107–292 substituted "1998 through 2007" for "1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001".
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1545-DR]


Florida; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-1545-DR), dated September 4, 2004, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 21, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 4, 2004:

    Liberty County for [Categories C-G] under the Public Assistance 
program (already designated for debris removal and emergency 
protective measures (Categories A and B) under the Public Assistance 
Program and direct Federal assistance at 100 percent Federal funding 
of the total eligible costs for the first 72 hours.)
    Baker, Bradford, Dixie, Hernando, Marion, and St. Lucie Counties 
for [Categories C-G] under the Public Assistance program (already 
designated for Individual Assistance and debris removal and 
emergency protective measures (Categories A and B) under the Public 
Assistance Program and direct Federal assistance at 100 percent 
Federal funding of the total eligible costs for the first 72 hours.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-22073 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration   

          - [TA-W-55,357]   

                    By letter dated September 14, 2004, a duly authorized representative of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts requested administrative reconsideration regarding Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for workers of the subject firm. The Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) certification for workers of Sanmina-SCI Corporation, Printed Circuit Board Division, Wilmington, Massachusetts was signed on August 13, 2004. The Department's notice will soon be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                   

The initial investigation determined that while at least five percent of the workforce at the subject firm is at least fifty years of age, workers of the subject worker group possess skills that are easily transferable.   

Additional investigation has determined that the workers do not possess skills that are easily transferable to comparable positions within the local commuting area and that competitive conditions within the industry are adverse.   

## Conclusion   

After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reconsideration, I conclude that the requirements of Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for workers at the subject firm.   

In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: 

“All workers of at Sanmina-SCI Corporation, Printed Circuit Board Division, Wilmington, Massachusetts, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after July 30, 2003 through August 13, 2006, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.” 

Signed in Washington, DC this 22nd day of September 2004.   

Elliott S. Kushner,   

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.   

[FR Doc. 04-22798 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]   

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hiking the Potkopinu Section of the Natchez Trace National Scenic Trail

Natchez Trace Parkway, Natchez Trace National Scenic Trail
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60325

Summary Calendar

REGINALD GALLAGHER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DONALD MCKELVEY; HINES; THOMAS;

COLL; RUSSELL; JOHN TORRES;

BUCHANNAN; HOLLAND; MUHAMMAD;

GLEN-RAY; STEVE BITHER; YUSUFF;

SMITH,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:98-CV-189-BrS

- - - - - - - - - - February 28, 2002

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

Reginald Gallagher, federal prisoner # 20174-001, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents

of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics

, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to state a claim. Gallagher argues that

he adequately stated claims for inadequate medical treatment, conspiracy, and retaliation.

Gallagher alleged in his complaint that he had a leg operati on due to an unspecified medical

condition, that it was determined that he would need another operation, but that he was treated with-2-

medicine instead. On appeal, he asserts that he has received the operation but that he has been denied

recommended postoperative treatment. He alleged in conclusional terms that the delay in medical

care caused him to suffer and endangered his health.

Gallagher’s disagreement with his medical treatment and the alleged delay in receiving such

treatment, along with his failure to specify how this caused him substantial harm, are insufficient to

state a constitutional violation. S ee Campbell v. City of San Antonio , 43 F.3d 973, 975 (5th Cir.

1995); Mendoza v. Lynaugh

, 989 F.2d 191, 195 (5th Cir. 1993); Varnado v. Lynaugh

, 920 F.2d 320,

321 (5th Cir. 1991). Because his assertion that he is receiving inadequate postoperative treatment

was not raised before the district court, we do not consider it here. S ee Leverette v. Louisville

Ladder Co.

, 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999), c ert. denied , 528 U.S. 1138 (2000). Given the

inadequacy of his allegations of the denial of medical treatment, Gallagher also has failed to state a

conspiracy claim based on this treatment. See 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3).

On appeal, Gallagher argues for the first time that his transfer to an upper level cell, despite

a medical recommendation that he be housed on a lower level, was done in retaliation for his filing

administrative grievances. Because Gallagher did not raise this issue below, we do not consider it

here. See Leverette , 183 F.3d at 342. Gallagher has abandoned his additional claims of retaliation

and his assertion of price fixing by failing to brief these issues on appeal. S ee Yohey v. Co llins

, 985

F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.