alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,880
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,544
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,766
<INVENTORY>                                      4,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,757
<PP&E>                                         755,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                 254,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 601,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          442,741<F1>
<BONDS>                                         36,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,004
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   601,825
<SALES>                                         93,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,997
<CGS>                                           78,025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (19)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,209
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,583
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,626
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,626
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Current liabilities include a total of $299 of term debt, classified
long-term secured debt in default, due to technical defaults ($139) or in
the process of being restructured ($35), and Senior Notes in default ($125).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**NSIAD-00-81**                      Published: May 18, 2000. Publicly Released: May 18, 2000.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) approach to implementing the U.S. Space Command's long-range plan for expanding military space systems, focusing on the extent to which: (1) plans for expanding military space systems conform to national and defense space policies; (2) funding projections support planned military space programs and desired capabilities; and (3) actions are being taken to educate military personnel to support future military space operations.

## Recommendations

## Recommendations for Executive Action

## Full Report

Full Report (52 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

National Defense

Cost effectiveness analysisDefense budgetsDefense capabilitiesDefense procurementFuture budget projectionsInteragency relationsMilitary policiesMilitary satellitesMilitary trainingStrategic planning
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from 
     GOPHER, INC. September 30, 1996 financial  statements and  is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894536
<NAME>                        GOPHER, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
### **Subchapter O—Gain or Loss on Disposition of Property**

Part
I.
Determination of amount of and recognition of gain or loss.
II.
Basis rules of general application.
III.
Common nontaxable exchanges.
IV.
Special rules.
[V.
Repealed.]
[VI.
Repealed.]  1

VII.
Wash sales; straddles.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1995**—Pub. L. 104–7, §2(c), Apr. 11, 1995, 109 Stat. 93, struck out item for part V "Changes to effectuate F.C.C. policy".

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(b)(9), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–522, struck out item for part VIII "Distributions pursuant to Bank Holding Company Act".

**1981**—Pub. L. 97–34, title V, §501(d)(3), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 327, substituted "Wash sales; straddles" for "Wash sales of stock or securities" in item for part VII.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(b)(32)(I), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1800, struck out item for part IX "Distributions pursuant to orders enforcing the antitrust laws".

Pub. L. 94–452, §2(c), Oct. 2, 1976, 90 Stat. 1512, struck out "of 1956" after "Bank Holding Company Act" in item for part VIII.

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–403, §1(b), Feb. 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 5, added item for part IX.

**1956**—Act May 9, 1956, ch. 240, §10(b), 70 Stat. 146, added item for part VIII.

1  Part repealed by Pub. L. 109–135 without corresponding amendment of subchapter analysis.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4953 

To repeal prescription drug price control provisions of the Inflation Reduction 

Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2022 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. LANKFORD, and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal prescription drug price control provisions of the 

Inflation Reduction Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Drug Innova5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICE CONTROL 

7 PROVISIONS. 

8 Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

9 the provisions of parts 1, 2, and 3 of subtitle B of title 

10 I of Public Law 117–169 are repealed and the provisions 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4953 IS

1 of law amended by such parts are restored as if such parts 

2 had never been enacted. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Order entered May 2 1 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00435 - CV MY VACATION EUROPE, INC., Appellant V. CONNIE SIGEL, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. CC - 13 - 06937 - E 

### O RDER Because the clerk’s record filed electronically April 18, 2014 is defective and a corrected record was filed May 13, 2014, we STRIKE the April 18th record from the record of this cause.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### Albert H. Washburn and Others, Transacting Business under the Firm Name and Style of Comstock & Washburn, Appellants, v. William Salmon, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of *Segschneider*v. *Waring Hat Manufacturing Co.*(134 App. Div. 217). Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
### PART VII—RECOVERIES OF FOREIGN EXPROPRIATION LOSSES

Sec.
1351.
Treatment of recoveries of foreign expropriation losses.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMeasurement of multiaxial ply strength by an off-axis flexure testAn off-axis flexure (OAF) test was performed to measure ply strength under multiaxial stress states. This test involves unidirectional off-axis specimens loaded in bending, using an apparatus that allows these anisotropic specimens to twist as well as flex without the complications of a resisting torque. A 3D finite element stress analysis verified that simple beam theory could be used to compute the specimen bending stresses at failure. Unidirectional graphite/epoxy specimens with fiber angles ranging from 90 deg to 15 deg have combined normal and shear stresses on their failure planes that are typical of 45 deg plies in structural laminates. Tests for a range of stress states with AS4/3501-6 specimens showed that both normal and shear stresses on the failure plane influenced cracking resistance. This OAF test may prove to be useful for generating data needed to predict ply cracking in composite structures and may also provide an approach for studying fiber-matrix interface failures under stress states typical of structures.Document ID19920015637Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCrews, John H., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Naik, Rajiv A.*(Analytical Services and Materials, Inc., Hampton VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1992Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107570NAS 1.15:107570Meeting InformationMeeting: ASTM Symposium on Composite Materials: Testing and DesignLocation: Pittsburgh, PACountry: United StatesStart Date: May 4, 1992End Date: May 5, 1992Accession Number92N24880Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-50Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920015637.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3936.20 Issuance of notices of noncompliance and orders. ( a ) If the BLM determines that an operator, licensee, or lessee has not complied with established requirements, the BLM will issue to the operator, licensee, or lessee a notice of noncompliance.
( b ) If operations threaten immediate, serious, or irreparable damage to the environment, the mine or deposit being mined, or other valuable mineral deposits or other resources, the BLM will order the cessation of operations and will require the operator, licensee, or lessee to revise the POD or exploration plan.
( c ) The operator, licensee, or lessee will be considered to have received all orders or notices of noncompliance and orders that the operator, licensee, or lessee receives by personal delivery or certified mail. The BLM will consider service of any notice of noncompliance or order to have occurred 7 business days after the date the notice or order is mailed. Verbal orders and notices may be given to officials at the mine or exploration site, but the BLM will confirm them in writing within 10 business days.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4754 

To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study and submit a report 

on national resource adequacy, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2022 

Mr. BRAUN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study and 

submit a report on national resource adequacy, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT ON NATIONAL RESOURCE 

4 ADEQUACY. 

5 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

6 (1) RESOURCE ADEQUACY.—The term ‘‘re7 source adequacy’’ means the ability of supply side 

8 and demand-side resources to meet aggregate elec9 tricity demand (including losses). 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4754 IS

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of Energy. 

3 (b) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a com4 prehensive study on national resource adequacy to deter5 mine— 

6 (1) how recent retirements of baseload electric 

7 generation have affected the regional firm capacity 

8 available for all regional electric grids; 

9 (2) the effects that planned retirements of base10 load electric generation and the increased need for 

11 peaking capacity have or would have on energy 

12 shortfalls; 

13 (3) how the variable nature of certain sources 

14 of energy production and forecasting errors may im15 pact resource adequacy and capacity accreditation; 

16 (4)(A) a range of potential future electricity de17 mand trajectories that captures the uncertainty rep18 resented by a changing climate, decarbonization, and 

19 macroeconomic factors; and 

20 (B) whether that future electricity demand re21 quires increasing firm capacity or interregional 

22 transmission to load match with regional peak power 

23 demand during all hours of the year; and 

24 (5) the extent to which variable generation 

25 technologies in concert with other technical and nonVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:14 Aug 12, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4754.IS S4754

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4754 IS

1 technical solutions can provide adequate capacity to 

2 meet a range of potential future electricity demand 

3 trajectories. 

4 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

5 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 

6 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 

7 Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of 

8 the House of Representatives a report describing the re9 sults of the study conducted under subsection (b), includ10 ing recommendations for Congress to ensure that the 

11 United States maintains necessary resource adequacy to 

12 meet forecasted demand. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hat Shop

Bryce Canyon National Park
Searched for **https://www.prc.gov/sites/default/files/DocketsPAC/AutoclosurePlaceholder.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.prc.gov/sites/default/files/DocketsPAC/AutoclosurePlaceholder.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22711]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Secretarial Authorization for a Member of the Department of the 
Navy To Serve on the Board of Directors, Navy-Marine Corps Relief 
Society

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 1033, the Secretary of the Navy 
has authorized a member of the Navy to serve, without compensation on 
the Board of Directors for the Navy-Marine Corps Relief Society. The 
official so authorized, along with the name of the current incumbent to 
this position, is as follows: Chief of Naval Operations (N4), Vice 
Admiral J. D. McCarthy, SC, USN.
    Authorization to serve on the Board of Directors has been made for 
the purpose of providing oversight and advice to, and coordination 
with, the Navy-Marine Corps Relief Society. Participation of the above 
official in the activities of the Society will not extend to 
participation in day-to-day operations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Meredith 
Robinson, Office of the Judge Advocate General, Administrative Law 
Division, 703-604-8280.

(Authority: 10 U.S.C. 1033(c))

    Dated: October 4, 2004.
J. H. Wagshul,
Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register 
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-22711 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
#### § 404.15 How can I request assistance under the program?

This table summarizes the requirements for requesting assistance under the program. The requirements are described in more detail in the sections that follow.

| Type of assistance requested | How to request assistance |
| --- | --- |
| 1. Request Reclamation to conduct an appraisal investigation | Submit a statement of interest as described in § 404.16. Reclamation will then advise you whether you are eligible to submit a full proposal. |
| 2. Request funding to conduct an appraisal investigation yourself or through a contractor | Submit a statement of interest as described in § 404.16. Reclamation will then advise you whether you are eligible to submit a full proposal. |
| 3. Request Reclamation to conduct a feasibility study | Submit a full proposal as described in § 404.20. |
| 4. Request funding to conduct a feasibility study yourself or through a contractor | Submit a full proposal as described in § 404.20. |
| 5. Request Reclamation to review and approve an appraisal investigation or a feasibility study completed without Reclamation assistance | Submit the investigation or study and a cover letter to your local Reclamation office, as described in § 404.25. |
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCGRO Cycle6This is the final report covering the contract that supported several interrelated task. The first was the calibration of the BATSE SPECtroscopy detectors by comparison with known spectra. The second project was the installation and support of software to enable routine analysis of BATSE data. The third project was the support of several scientific investigations utilizing BATSE flare data.Document ID20020091827Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSchwartz, Richard A.*(Raytheon STX Corp. Lanham, MD United States)*Norris, J.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1999Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:209880NASA/CR-1999-209880Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASA Order S-89523-ZDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020091827.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016
(the Form 10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 21, 2016



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DAVID GLADSTONE    
|David Gladstone        
|Chief Executive Officer