alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECTION 1

GOVERNOR I S LETTER
•

VICTOR ATIYEH

COVERNOR

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

STATE CAPITOL

SALEM. OREGON 973 10

June 1, 1984

Ernesta Barnes

Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region X

1200 Sixth Avenue

Seattle, Washington 98101

Pursuant to Section 3006(b) of the Resource Conservation

and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, enclosed please find

Oregon's complete application for Final Authorization to

operate the state's hazardous waste program in lieu of a

federal program. Assuming our application is approved,

as I expect it will be, we look forward to operating an

equivalent (in effect) program in partnership with EPA.

If there are any questions on the application, please feel

free to work through Department of Environmental Quality

Director, Fred Hansen, for resolution.

SiLZ~~~/:±Y-7~----- I [

7

, ----:-

, 7;J -"--.- • /1/ ./(ll -=-~

Victor Atiyeh

Governor

VA:cs

Enclosures
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22428]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3633]


State of West Virginia (Amendment <greek-i>2)

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
September 27, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning September 
16, 2004, and continuing through September 27, 2004.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is November 19, 2004 and for 
economic injury the deadline is June 20, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008).

    Dated: September 29, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-22428 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Dealing with Human Waste

Guadalupe Mountains National Park
#### Baynes *v.*The State.

Fish, C. J.

Upon the trial of one of two defendants jointly indicted for murder, there was evidence tending to show that they both, about the same time, assaulted and wounded the person alleged to have been' killed, the defendant on trial using- a gun stock and a scantling, the other defendant shooting with a pistol, and that the person so wounded died several days thereafter from one or more of the wounds so indicted; but the evidence did not demand a finding that there was any conspiracy or common felonious design on the part of the defendants to take the life of such person, nor that any assault made by the defendant on trial caused his death. *Held,,*that the court should have instructed the jury to the effect, (1) that if the defendant on trial did not kill the deceased nor participate in the felonious design of the person who *220did kill him, but made a separate and independent assault upon the deceased, with a weapon likely to produce death, and with a separate intent of his own to kill the deceased, and under such circumstances that if death had ensued it would have been murder, then such defendant would be guilty of assault with intent to murder; and (2) that if the defendant on trial assaulted and wounded the deceased under such circumstances as just detailed, unlawfully, but without any intention to kill him, and such assault did not result in death, then he would be guilty of assault and battery. See *Brooks*v. *State,*128 *Ga.*261 (57 S. E. 483, 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 889); *Walker*v. *State,*116 *Ga.*537 (5) (42 S. E. 787, 67 L. R. A. 426); *McLeroy*v. *State,*125 *Ga.*240 (1) (54 S. E. 125); *Smith v. State,*127 *Ga.*262 (56 S. E. 360). Where the defendant on trial was found guilty of murder, the failure to instruct the jury substantially as above indicated was cause for a new trial. *Judgment reversed.*

October 11, 1910.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Lewis. Jasper superior court. April *20,*1910.

*Eugene M. Baynes,*for plaintiff in error.

*John O. Mart, altorney-g'eneral,tmd Joseph E. Pottle, solicitor-general,*contra.

*All the Justices concur.*
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 21, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A1588. RANDY JENKINS HARMON, JR. v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On June 05, 2017, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than June 15, 2017. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a). Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from that order.Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 21, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.
### §6872. Suspension of period on assessment

If the regulations issued pursuant to section 6036 require the giving of notice by any fiduciary in any case under title 11 of the United States Code, or by a receiver in any other court proceeding, to the Secretary of his qualification as such, the running of the period of limitations on the making of assessments shall be suspended for the period from the date of the institution of the proceeding to a date 30 days after the date upon which the notice from the receiver or other fiduciary is received by the Secretary; but the suspension under this sentence shall in no case be for a period in excess of 2 years.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 838; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 96–589, §6 (i)(12), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3411.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–589 substituted "any case under title 11 of the United States Code" for "any proceeding under the Bankruptcy Act".

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–589 effective Oct. 1, 1979, but not applicable to proceedings under Title 11, Bankruptcy, commenced before Oct. 1, 1979, see section 7(e) of Pub. L. 96–589, set out as a note under section 108 of this title.
No. 14,655.

#### The People *v.*Wilson.

(106 P. [2d] 352)

Decided October 7, 1940.

Mr. Frank Delaney, for the people.

Mr. I. L. Quiat, Mr. Ralph J. Cummings, Mr. Allyn Cole, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Bakke

delivered the opinion, of the court.

This matter concerns a writ of error sued out by the people under the provisions of section 500, chapter 48, ’35 C.S.A., C.L. 7113. Defendant in error was tried, and *438acquitted, on the charge of selling liquor to a minor, in violation of section 17 (b), chapter 89, ’35 C.S.A., S.L., ’35, p. 598, §3, Par. (b).

 The question is, May a licensed liquor dealer justify the sale of liquor to a minor on his belief that the purchaser was twenty-one years of age?

The court instructed the jury that if the defendant made the sale under the honest belief that the purchaser was then twenty-one years of age or older, and that defendant acted as a reasonably prudent man in so believing, “then and in that case you should find the defendant not guilty.”

We think the court erred. It is incumbent on the licensed dealer to see that his customer is not within a proscribed class; proceeding otherwise, he does so at his peril. We do not perceive that our statute contemplated the exercise of good faith on the part of the licensee. On whatever evidence he may act in a given instance, and regardless of his good faith, the licensee must assume the risk involved. See *McCutcheon v. People,*69 Ill. 601; 15 R.C.L. 365; Wharton’s Criminal Law (11th ed.), §1808, pp. 1998-99; 115 A.L.R. 1230 (1938); Black on Intoxicating Liquors, §418; *Harper v. State,*91 Ark. 422, 121 S.W. 737.

Accordingly, we disapprove of the action of the trial court as indicated.

Mr. Justice Burke,

concurring.

I concur in the conclusion, but am clearly of the opinion that under section 18, article 2 of our Constitution, the disposition should be, “reversed and remanded for a new trial.”

Mr. Justice Young concurs in this statement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from 
     RADAR RESOURCES, INC. September 30, 1998  financial  statements and  is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894502
<NAME>                        RADAR RESOURCES, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998

<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### § 4.804 Extensions of time.

A request for extension of time should be made to the designated administrative law judge or other appropriate Departmental official with respect to matters pending before him. Such request shall be served on all parties and set forth the reasons for the request. Extensions may be granted upon a showing of good cause by the applicant. Answers to such requests are permitted if made promptly.
### §4304. Native American trade and export promotion

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, acting through the Director, shall carry out a Native American export and trade promotion program (referred to in this section as the "program").

#### (b) Coordination of Federal programs and services

In carrying out the program, the Secretary, acting through the Director, and in cooperation with the heads of appropriate Federal agencies, shall ensure the coordination of Federal programs and services designed to—

(1) develop the economies of Indian Tribes; and

(2) stimulate the demand for Indian goods and services that are available from eligible entities.

#### (c) Activities

In carrying out the duties described in subsection (b), the Secretary, acting through the Director, shall ensure the coordination of, or, as appropriate, carry out—

(1) Federal programs designed to provide technical or financial assistance to eligible entities;

(2) the development of promotional materials;

(3) the financing of appropriate trade missions;

(4) the marketing of Indian goods and services;

(5) the participation of appropriate Federal agencies or eligible entities in international trade fairs; and

(6) any other activity related to the development of markets for Indian goods and services.

#### (d) Technical assistance

In conjunction with the activities described in subsection (c), the Secretary, acting through the Director, shall provide technical assistance and administrative services to eligible entities to assist those entities with—

(1) the identification of appropriate markets for Indian goods and services;

(2) entering the markets referred to in paragraph (1);

(3) compliance with foreign or domestic laws and practices with respect to financial institutions with respect to the export and import of Indian goods and services; and

(4) entering into financial arrangements to provide for the export and import of Indian goods and services.

#### (e) Priorities

In carrying out the duties and activities described in subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary, acting through the Director, shall give priority to activities that—

(1) provide the greatest degree of economic benefits to Indians; and

(2) foster long-term stable international markets for Indian goods and services.

(Pub. L. 106–464, §5, Nov. 7, 2000, 114 Stat. 2016; Pub. L. 116–261, §3(e)(2), Dec. 30, 2020, 134 Stat. 3311.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 116–261 substituted "Tribes" for "tribes".
§ 3504.16 When is my rental due after the first year of the lease? ( a ) For prospecting permits, pay your rental in advance each year before the anniversary date of the permit.
( b ) For sodium, potassium or asphalt leases, pay your rental in advance before January 1 of each year.
( c ) For phosphate leases pay your rental in advance on or before the anniversary date of the lease.
( d ) For other mineral leases not covered in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, pay the rental in advance each year before the anniversary of the effective date of the lease.
( e ) MMS will credit your lease rental for any year against the first production royalties or minimum royalties (see § 3504.25 of this part) as the royalties accrue under the lease during that year.
### §6414. Income tax withheld

In the case of an overpayment of tax imposed by chapter 24, or by chapter 3 or 4, refund or credit shall be made to the employer or to the withholding agent, as the case may be, only to the extent that the amount of such overpayment was not deducted and withheld by the employer or withholding agent.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 798; Pub. L. 111–147, title V, §501(c)(1), Mar. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 106.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–147 inserted "or 4" after "chapter 3".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–147 applicable to payments made after Dec. 31, 2012, with certain exceptions, see section 501(d)(1), (2) of Pub. L. 111–147, set out as a note under section 1471 of this title.
#### § 429.12 Where do I file my application?

File your completed and signed application, including the $100 nonrefundable application fee, with the Reclamation office having jurisdiction over the land, facility, or waterbody associated with your request. Reclamation office locations may be found on *http://www.usbr.gov,* the official Reclamation Internet Web site.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-22160-CV-WILLIAMS

PAUL JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

MIDNIGHT EXPRESS 

POWER BOATS, INC.,

Defendant.

/

OMNIBUS ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian’s Report 

and Recommendation (DE 125) (“Report”) Following Hearing and Amending Prior 

Report and Recommendation (DE 118) on Plaintiff’s Motion for Stay Pending Appeal 

and Motion to Dissolve Writ of Garnishment (DE 111) (“Motion”). In the Report, Judge 

Damian recommends that the Motion be denied as moot because the Eleventh Circuit 

has affirmed the District Court’s summary judgment order and because the parties have 

resolved the outstanding issues regarding the pending Writ of Garnishment. (DE 125 at 

2, 3.) Judge Damian also recommends that the Court order Garnishee Bank of America, 

N.A., to pay to Defendant $1,492.30 pursuant to the Writ of Garnishment entered on 

September 20, 2022 (DE 109) and, following the collection of Bank of America’s own fee 

of $125, to dissolve the writ and unfreeze any remaining funds in Plaintiff’s Bank of 

America account. (DE 123 at 3.) Finally, Judge Damian notes that at the status 

conference she held on February 21, 2023, she discussed Plaintiff’s pending Motion for 

a Ten Day Order to Amend, filed on February 14, 2023 (DE 121). Judge Damian notes

Case 1:20-cv-22160-KMW Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

that Plaintiff agreed to confer with counsel for Defendant in compliance with Southern 

District of Florida Local Rule 7.1 and to amend or refile his Motion (DE 121) to clarify the 

relief requested. No objections were filed to the Report, and the time to object has 

passed.

Upon a careful review of the Report, the Motion, the record, and applicable law,

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. Judge Damian’s Report (DE 125) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and Motion to Dissolve Writ of 

Garnishment (DE 111) is DENIED AS MOOT. 

3. Judge Damian’s prior Report (DE 118) is amended and otherwise replaced 

by Judge Damian’s Report (DE 125) and is therefore MOOT.

4. Garnishee Bank of America, N.A., shall pay to Defendant $1,492.30 

pursuant to the Writ of Garnishment entered on September 20, 2022 (DE 

109) and, following the collection of Bank of America’s own fee of $125, 

the Writ of Garnishment shall be dissolved and any remaining funds in

Plaintiff’s Bank of America account shall be unfrozen. 

5. Plaintiff’s Motion for a Ten Day Order to Amend (DE 121) is DENIED for 

failing to comply with Southern District of Florida Local Rule 7.1(a)(3).

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 5th day of

May, 2023.

Case 1:20-cv-22160-KMW Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

                  The undersigned executive officer of PFS Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.



                                    /s/ Mel E. Green
                                    ----------------------
                                    Name: Mel E. Green
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 27, 2003
§ 106.501 What minimum requirements are applicable to SBA's solicitation and/or acceptance of Gifts? While SBA may subject the solicitation and/or acceptance of Gifts to additional requirements through internal policy and procedure, the following requirements must apply to all Gift solicitations and/or acceptances under the authority of the Small Business Act sections cited in § 106.500: ( a ) SBA is required to use the Gift (whether cash or in-kind) in a manner consistent with the original purpose of the Gift;
( b ) There must be written documentation of each Gift solicitation and/or acceptance signed by an authorized SBA official;
( c ) Any Gift solicited and/or accepted must undergo a determination, prior to solicitation of the Gift or prior to acceptance of the Gift if unsolicited, of whether a conflict of interest exists between the Donor and SBA; and
( d ) All cash Gifts donated to SBA under the authority cited in § 106.500 must be deposited in an SBA trust account at the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
§ 3832.22 How much land may I include in my mining claim? ( a ) *Lode claims.* Lode claims must not exceed 1,500 by 600 feet. If there is a vein, lode, or ledge, each lode claim is limited to a maximum of 1,500 feet along the course of the vein, lode, or ledge and a maximum of 300 feet in width on each side of the middle of the vein, lode, or ledge.
( b ) *Placer claims.* ( 1 ) An individual placer claim may not exceed 20 acres in size.
( 2 ) An association placer claim may not exceed 160 acres. Within the association, each person or business entity may locate up to 20 acres. To obtain the full 160 acres, the association must consist of at least eight co-locators. You may locate smaller association claims. Thus, three co-locators may jointly locate an association placer claim no larger than 60 acres. You may not use the names of other persons as dummy locators (fictitious locators) to locate an association placer claim for your own benefit.