alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 

**- 1992** 

OLUWATOYIN OSUNFUNMIPE ADEKANMBI, a/k/a Oluwatoyin Osunfunmipe Adesina

,

Petitioner

,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for R eview of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : July 19, 2011 Decided: August 11, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Paul S. Allen, PAUL SHEARMAN ALLEN A ND ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Jennifer P. Levings, Senior Litigation Counsel, U NITED S TATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

, Office of Immigration Litigation

, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Oluwatoyin Osunfunmipe Adekanmbi, a native and citizen

of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (Board) upholdin g the immigration judge’s

denial of her motion for a continuance. We have reviewed the

record and Adekanmbi’s claims and find no abuse of discretion.

See Lendo v. Gonzales , 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir. 2007) . We

therefore uphold the denial of Adekanmbi’s motion for the

reasons stated by the Board, see In re Adekanmbi (B.I.A.

July 30 , 2010), and deny the petition for review. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court an d

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
No. 89-6467.

#### Tiggs *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 4200.1 Authority for grazing privileges.

The BLM is authorized under the Alaska Livestock Grazing Act (Act of March 4, 1927, [43 U.S.C. 316](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/43/316), [316a-316o](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/43/316a)) to lease to qualified applicants the grazing privileges on the grazing districts established in Alaska.

[[63 FR 51855](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/63-FR-51855), Sept. 29, 1998]

Group 4300—Grazing Administration; Alaska; Reindeer; General

Note:

The information collection requirements contained in subpart 4320 of Group 4300 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under [44 U.S.C. 3507](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/44/3507) and assigned clearance number 1004-0024. The information is being collected to permit the authorized officer to determine whether an application to utilize the public lands in Alaska for reindeer grazing should be granted. The information will be used to make this determination. The obligation to respond is required to obtain a benefit.

[[48 FR 40890](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/48-FR-40890), Sept. 12, 1983]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of E Med Future, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2008 (the Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Donald Sullivan                                                      
|DONALD SULLIVAN                                                          
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND INTERIM PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Date: August 19, 2008
D 1 (in) D 2 (in) D 3(in) 11-200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.000 0.200 13-205 0.205 0.205 0.205 0.000 0.205 14-208 0.208 0.209 0.208 0.001 0.208 15-209 0.209 0.211 0.211 0.002 0.210 20-215 0.215 0.215 0.216 0.001 0.215 22-218 0.218 0.217 0.218 0.001 0.218 where: where: a D 1,2,3 a D 1,2,3 b ∆ D b ∆ D

c D avg c D avg Date: March 23, 2010 

## Nozzle Calibration Calibrated by: Kevin Donahoe Nozzle ID

= maximum difference between any two diameters, mm (in.), ∆ D ≤0.004 in. (0.10 mm). = average of D 1 , D 2 , D 3 . Nozzle Diameter a ∆ D b (in) D avg c (in)

= three different nozzle diameter measurements, in. (mm); measured to the nearest 0.001 in. (0.025 mm.).
§ 105.302 Assistance to employees or members of quasi-Government organizations. ( a ) The Standards of Conduct Committee must approve SBA Assistance, other than Disaster loans under subparagraphs (1) and (2) of section 7(b) of the Small Business Act, to a person if its sole proprietor, general partner, officer, director or stockholder with a 10 percent or more interest (or a household member) is a member or employee of a Small Business Advisory Council or is a SCORE volunteer.
( b ) In reviewing requests for approval, factors the Standards of Conduct Committee may consider include whether the granting of the SBA Assistance might result in or create the appearance of giving preferential treatment, the loss of complete independence or impartiality, or adversely affect the confidence of the public in the integrity of the Government.
§ 46.220 How to designate lead agencies. ( a ) In most cases, the Responsible Official should designate one Federal agency as the lead with the remaining Federal, State, tribal governments, and local agencies assuming the role of cooperating agency. In this manner, the other Federal, State, and local agencies can work to ensure that the NEPA document will meet their needs for adoption and application to their related decision(s).
( b ) In some cases, a non-Federal agency (including a tribal government) must comply with State or local requirements that are comparable to the NEPA requirements. In these cases, the Responsible Official may designate the non-Federal agency as a joint lead agency. (See 40 CFR 1501.5 and 1506.2 for a description of the selection of lead agencies, the settlement of lead agency disputes, and the use of joint lead agencies.)
( c ) In some cases, the Responsible Official may establish a joint lead relationship among several Federal agencies. If there is a joint lead, then one Federal agency must be identified as the agency responsible for filing the environmental impact statement with EPA.
Exhibit 32(ii)

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-K filed by Crescent Financial Corporation (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                     |  |     |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Bruce W. Elder                          
|                     |  |     |  | Bruce W. Elder                              
|                     |  |     |  | Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ray J. Oleson the Chief Executive Officer of SI International, Inc. (the "Company"), has executed this certification in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 28, 2002 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1)  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: April 15, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ Ray J. OlesonName: Ray J. Oleson
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SI International, Inc. and will be retained by SI International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
### §7455. Service of process

The mailing by certified mail or registered mail of any pleading, decision, order, notice, or process in respect of proceedings before the Tax Court shall be held sufficient service of such pleading, decision, order, notice, or process.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 884; Pub. L. 85–866, title I, §89(b), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1665.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1958—Pub. L. 85–866 inserted "certified mail or" before "registered mail".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1958 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 85–866 applicable only if mailing occurs after Sept. 2, 1958, see section 89(d) of Pub. L. 85–866, set out as a note under section 7502 of this title.
§ 4150.3 Settlement. Where violations are repeated willful, the authorized officer shall take action under § 4170.1-1(b) of this title. The amount due for settlement shall include the value of forage consumed as determined in accordance with paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this section. Settlement for willful and repeated willful violations shall also include the full value for all damages to the public lands and other property of the United States; and all reasonable expenses incurred by the United States in detecting, investigating, resolving violations, and livestock impoundment costs. ( a ) For nonwillful violations: The value of forage consumed as determined by the average monthly rate per AUM for pasturing livestock on privately owned land (excluding irrigated land) in each State as published annually by the Department of Agriculture. The authorized officer may approve nonmonetary settlement of unauthorized use only when the authorized officer determines that each of the following conditions is satisfied: ( 1 ) Evidence shows that the unauthorized use occurred through no fault of the livestock operator;
( 2 ) The forage use is insignificant;
( 3 ) The public lands have not been damaged; and
( 4 ) Nonmonetary settlement is in the best interest of the United States.
( b ) For willful violations: Twice the value of forage consumed as determined in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) For repeated willful violations: Three times the value of the forage consumed as determined in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) Payment made under this section does not relieve the alleged violator of any criminal liability under Federal or State law.
( e ) Violators shall not be authorized to make grazing use on the public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management until any amount found to be due the United States under this section has been paid. The authorized officer may take action under subpart 4160 of this part to cancel or suspend grazing authorizations or to deny approval of applications for grazing use until such amounts have been paid.
( f ) Upon a stay of a decision issued under paragraph (e) of this section, the authorized officer will allow a permittee or lessee to graze in accordance with this part 4100 pending completion of the administrative appeal process.
[49 FR 6454, Feb. 21, 1984, as amended at 53 FR 10235, Mar. 29, 1988; 60 FR 9968, Feb. 22, 1995; 61 FR 4227, Feb. 5, 1996; 71 FR 39508, July 12, 2006]
§ 46.100 Federal action subject to the procedural requirements of NEPA. ( a ) A bureau proposed action is subject to the procedural requirements of NEPA if it would cause effects on the human environment (40 CFR 1508.14), and is subject to bureau control and responsibility (40 CFR 1508.18). The determination of whether a proposed action is subject to the procedural requirements of NEPA depends on the extent to which bureaus exercise control and responsibility over the proposed action and whether Federal funding or approval are necessary to implement it. If Federal funding is provided with no Federal agency control as to the expenditure of such funds by the recipient, NEPA compliance is not necessary. The proposed action is not subject to the procedural requirements of NEPA if it is exempt from the requirements of section 102(2) of NEPA.
( b ) A bureau shall apply the procedural requirements of NEPA when the proposal is developed to the point that: ( 1 ) The bureau has a goal and is actively preparing to make a decision on one or more alternative means of accomplishing that goal; and
( 2 ) The effects of the proposed action can be meaningfully evaluated (40 CFR 1508.23).
<PAGE>

                                                                       Exhibit 2

                           HOLMES FINANCING (NO.4) PLC
                                    04167953

                              ABBEY NATIONAL HOUSE
                         2 TRITON SQUARE, REGENTS PLACE
                                 LONDON NW1 3AN

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                              United States Code)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of the servicer does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Form 20-F") of Holmes Financing (No. 4) PLC (the "Company") fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  30 June 2003                          /s/ David Green
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              David Green
                                              Director

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION  June 30, 1997  financial  statements
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894551
<NAME>                        ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### Rush, administratrix, *v.*Howkins.

September 22, 1910.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Cbarlton. Chatham superior court. January *7,*1909.

*Twiggs & Gazan,*for plaintiff.

*O’Byrne, Hartridge & Wright,*for defendant.

Holden, J.

George W- Rush and J. S. Howkins formed a partnership

to conduct an apiary. “The business was conducted by the said George W- Rush, as he knew and understood a bee culture enterprise, and was to manage and direct the cultivation of the bees and the maintenance of the apiary at West Savannah, Georgia.” Each made application for insurance on his own life,, and a policy for $1,000 was issued on the life of each, payable to the other. The-premiums on the policies were paid with funds of the partnership. The policy on the life of Rush was payable to “J.- .S. Howkins, business partner of insured.” Rush died during the existence of the partnership, and at the date of his death the business liad made a profit of $104.94. Howkins collected the amount due on the policy on the life of Rush and appropriated the same to his own personal use, for which amount thus collected the administrator of the estate of Rush sued Howkins. *Eeld,*that as the continuance of the partnership afforded a reasonable expectancy of advantage and benefit to Howkins, lie had an insurable interest in the life of his copartner, and, as the beneficiary named in the policy issued on the life of such copartner, was entitled to receive and retain the entire proceeds thereof. Civil Code, § 2114; 1 Cooley’s Briefs on Ins. 296, 25 Cyc. 706, 707; Conn Mut. Lite Ins. Co. *v.*Luchs, 108 U. S. 498, 505 (2 Sup. Ct. 949, 27 L. ed. 800) ; 3 Am. *&*Eng. Enc. Law, 933 et seq., 955; Morrell v. Trenton Mut. Life &c. Ins. Co., 10 Cush. (Mass.) 282 (57 Am. Dec. 92, and see note on pages 95-98) ; 1 Bacon, Benefit Societies and Life Ins. § 251.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 3101.51 General requirements.

Public domain and acquired lands will be leased only after seeking concurrence from the surface managing agency, which, upon receipt of a description of the lands from the authorized officer, may report to the authorized officer that it consents to leasing with stipulations, if any, or withholds consent or objects to leasing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 676

 702

 701

 667

 675

 639

 608

 609

 600

 563

 507

 529

 542

 537

 479

 445

 425

 410

 430

 397

 410

 302

 251

 257

 273

 301

 331

 399

 499

 586

 625

 615

 626

 642

 632

 624

 592

 587

 546

 546

 487

 486

 500

 525

 466

 410

 419

 379

 376

 397

 375

 312

 219

 217

 250

 251

 271

 300

 334

 401

 500

 558

 637

 655

 672

 648

 646

 608

 601

 575

 570

 529

 495

 516

 533

 503

 444

 435

 398

 393

 411

 384

 382

 244

 230

 253

 262

 284

 313

 365

 445

 541

 604

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 18,244

 18,331

 18,405

 18,442

 18,495

 18,479

 18,429

 18,341

 18,320

 18,267

 18,143

 18,058

 17,969

 17,861

 17,737

 17,601

 17,439

 17,225

 17,055

 16,852

 16,609

 16,240

 15,894

 15,589

 15,262

 14,918

 14,568

 14,265

 14,049

 13,972

 13,939

 608

 611

 614

 615

 617

 616

 614

 611

 611

 609

 605

 602

 599

 595

 591

 587

 581

 574

 569

 562

 554

 541

 530

 520

 509

 497

 486

 476

 468

 466

 465

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Historic Quarry Trail

Fossil Butte National Monument
§ 41.125 Effect of other requirements. ( a ) *Effect of other Federal provisions.* The obligations imposed by these Title IX regulations are independent of, and do not alter, obligations not to discriminate on the basis of sex imposed by Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12087, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264; sections 704 and 855 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295m, 298b-2); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.*); the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (29 U.S.C. 206); and any other Act of Congress or Federal regulation.
( b ) *Effect of State or local law or other requirements.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any State or local law or other requirement that would render any applicant or student ineligible, or limit the eligibility of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, to practice any occupation or profession.
( c ) *Effect of rules or regulations of private organizations.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any rule or regulation of any organization, club, athletic or other league, or association that would render any applicant or student ineligible to participate or limit the eligibility or participation of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, in any education program or activity operated by a recipient and that receives Federal financial assistance.