alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 0:20-cv-61176-WPD

WESMI DAOUT,

Plaintiff, 

v.

MEDICAL TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS, INC.,

A Florida Profit Corporation,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff Wesmi Daout’s Notice of Acceptance of 

Defendant’s Offer of Judgment (the “Notice”) [DE 35], filed herein on May 24, 2021. The Court 

has carefully considered the Notice, the Offer [DE 35-1], and is otherwise fully advised in the 

premises. 

“When a plaintiff’s FLSA claim is compromised, acceptance of a Rule 68 offer of 

judgment does not relieve the Court of its duty to determine whether the settlement is a “fair and 

reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute” as required by Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United 

States, 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir.1981).” Sommer v. Augie My Boy, LLC, No. 2:14-CV-77-FTM29CM, 2015 WL 268991, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 21, 2015); see also Kingsley v. Noonan, No. 

6:12-CV-500-ORL-22, 2012 WL 5378743, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 31, 2012); c.f. Mackenzie v. 

Kindred Hospitals E., L.L.C., 276 F. Supp. 2d 1211, 1217 (M.D. Fla. 2003) (holding that Lynn’s 

Food Stores fairness analysis does not apply where defendant offered plaintiff more than full 

relief). The Court has reviewed the record and the Offer, and finds that the settlement is fair and 

Case 0:20-cv-61176-WPD Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2021 Page 1 of 2
reasonable. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Judgment is hereby entered in the amount of $2,800.00 in favor of Plaintiff 

Wesmi Daout and against Defendant Medical Transport Solutions, Inc., for which 

sum let execution issue forthwith.

2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine the reasonable amount of 

attorneys’ costs and fees, upon timely motion by Plaintiff. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 

26th day of May, 2021.

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61176-WPD Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2021 Page 2 of 2
(No. 869

Claimant awarded $138.84 with interest.)

#### William N. Johnson, Jr., Executor of the Estate of William N. Johnson, Deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1925.*

Inheritance *tax*— claimant *entitled to refund. Bee. 25.*Where upon proper proceedings an order of court is made directing a re-assessment of the tax under Sec. 25, Inheritance Tax Law, and it appeared upon the hearing in such proceeding that the estate is not subject to the tax, claimant is entitled to a refund of the tax paid.

H. Ward Heidenrich, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a suit by William Johnson, executor of the estate of William N. Johnson, deceased, for refund of inheritance taxes under Section 25 of the inheritance tax laws of Illinois, in the sum of $138.84. The deceased, domiciled in Chicago, Illinois, died January 3, 1918, leaving a last will and testament, and William N. Johnson, Jr., was appointed executor, who, with his sister, Margaret Blackman, were the only children and his only heirs-at-law left surviving. November 27, 1918, the county judge of Cook County entered an order fixing the amount of inheritance taxes in said estate at $138.84, which was paid February 19,1919, and was the correct amount under the assumption that prevailed at the time.

January 13, 1925, on proper petition to the county court, an order was entered directing a re-assessment and re-distribution. The Attorney General had notice of this proceeding and consented to the last order. Amongst other things, the court found that claimant herein was entitled to a refund of the said sum of $138.84. Certified copies of executor’s letters of executorship and orders of the county court all filed as evidence.

The Attorney General consents to the award claimed. Ordered by this court that claimant be paid a refund of $138.84, with *3%*interest per annum from February 19, 1919.
§ 9.7 How does the Secretary communicate with state and local officials concerning the Department's programs and activities? ( a ) For those programs and activities covered by a state process under § 9.6, the Secretary, to the extent permitted by law: ( 1 ) Uses the state process to determine views of state and local elected officials; and,
( 2 ) Communicates with state and local elected officials, through the state process, as early in a program planning cycle as in reasonably feasible to explain specific plans and actions.
( b ) The Secretary provides notice to directly affected state, areawide, regional, and local entities in a state of proposed federal financial assistance or direct federal development if: ( 1 ) The state has not adopted a process under the Order; or
( 2 ) The assistance or development involves a program or activity not selected for the state process.
This notice may be made by publication in the Federal Register or other appropriate means, which the Department in its discretion deems appropriate.
### [§1321. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(144), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1788]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 342, related to involuntary liquidation of LIFO inventories.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective for taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1976, see section 1901(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as an Effective Date of 1976 Amendment note under section 2 of this title.
CERTIFICATIONS




Exhibit
      31.2
            Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002




I, Thomas
Calabro, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Latin American Telecommunications
Venture Company - LATVCO.




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and




c)
presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date.




5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions);




a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize,
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and




6. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions, with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date:
July 17, 2009




/s/
Thomas Calabro


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Accounting Officer)
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2003 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-60622-RAR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1010 NORTH 30TH ROAD, HOLLYWOOD, 

FLORIDA 33021, in rem, et al., 

Defendants. 

_______________________________________/

ANDRES ZAMORA, et al., 

Claimants. 

____________________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss’s Report 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 42] (“Report”), filed on October 22, 2020. The Report 

recommends that Claimants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF No. 12] be granted in part 

and denied in part. See Report at 20. Specifically, the Report recommends that Count IV be 

dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend, and that the Motion otherwise be denied. 

Id. The time for objections has passed, and there are no objections to the Report. 

When a magistrate judge’s “disposition” has properly been objected to, district courts must 

review the disposition de novo. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). However, when no party has timely 

objected, “the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in 

order to accept the recommendation.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72 advisory committee’s notes (citation 

omitted). Although Rule 72 itself is silent on the standard of review, the Supreme Court has 

acknowledged Congress’s intent was to only require a de novo review where objections have been 

Case 0:20-cv-60622-RAR Document 46 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2020 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

properly filed, not when neither party objects. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It 

does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate [judge]’s 

factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to 

those findings.”). In any event, the “[f]ailure to object to the magistrate [judge]’s factual findings 

after notice precludes a later attack on these findings.” Lewis v. Smith, 855 F.2d 736, 738 (11th 

Cir. 1988) (citing Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 (5th Cir. 1982)). 

Because there are no objections to the Report, the Court did not conduct a de novo review. 

Rather, the Court reviewed the Report for clear error. Finding none, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [ECF No. 42] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Claimants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF No. 12] is GRANTED IN 

PART AND DENIED IN PART. Count IV of Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED

without prejudice with leave to amend. Should Plaintiff wish to file an Amended Complaint 

consistent with this Order, it must do so by December 2, 2020.

3. The remainder of Claimants’ Motion is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 23rd day of November, 2020.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Counsel of record

Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss

Case 0:20-cv-60622-RAR Document 46 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2020 Page 2 of 2
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Tuskegee Institute
National Historic Site
Alabama


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Bricks and Peanuts In 1881, Booker T. Washington arrived in Alabama and started building Tuskegee Institute both in reputation and literally brick by brick.  He recruited the best and the brightest to come and teach here including George Washington Carver who arrived in 1896.  Carver’s innovations in agriculture, especially with peanuts, expanded Tuskegee’s standing throughout the country.  The story continues....
  This house demonstrates how far Washington had come "Up From Slavery"The Oaks - Booker T. Washington Home Red brick three story Queen Anne Revival style house surrounded by a lush  green lawn.
 Tuskegee Student Made BricksIf You Build It, They Will Come Red Brick and Mortar wall section showing original bricks made by Tuskegee Institute students.
 George W. Carver Museum at Tuskegee UniversityThe Genius of George Washington.Carver George W. Carver Museum is a red brick structure with two entrances. White sign with name across the top with bust of Carver.between doors.
 Hair Dressing Made From PeanutsInventions of George W. Carver A jar of Hair Dressing developed by George W. Carver at Tuskegee Institute from peanuts.
 Booker T. Washington Built Tuskegee on a Solid Brick FoundationBooker T. Washington Photograph of Booker T. Washington, Founder and First President of Tuskegee Institute (Tuskegee Unversity)
 Last updated: March 4, 2020
 Peanut Medicine
Penoil Rubbing Oil Made by Carver
 Cosmetics From Peanuts Too!!!
Carver Made Cosmetics from Peanuts
 A School That Comes To You
Booker T. Washington School on Wheels
 Carver Taught With Models
Carver With Ox Skeleton Teaching Anatomy
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 1212 West Montgomery Road
Tuskegee Institute,
AL
36088
 Phone: 334 727-3200 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected
 Explore subjects and stories related to this park
 Subject
Underground Railroad
 Subject
African American Heritage
 Subject
Teaching with Historic Places
 Subject
National Historic Landmarks
 Subject
Civil Rights
 Subject
Historic Preservation Fund
 Subject
Presidents
 Subject
Reconstruction Era
 Subject
American Revolution
 Subject
Cold War


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
# Eiropas Savienības C 278A/2005

| | ISSN 1725-5201 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 278A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 48. sējums2005. gada 11. novembris |

ISSN 1725-5201

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 278A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

48. sējums2005. gada 11. novembris

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Paziņojumi |
| | Padome |
| 2005/C 278A/1 | Paziņojums par asistenta vakanci — Atsauce: Conseil/B/025 | 1 |
| | Eiropas Centrālā banka |
| 2005/C 278A/2 | Ģenerāldirektora vietnieka vakance Juridiskajā ģenerāldirektorātā | 2 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

III   Paziņojumi

Padome

2005/C 278A/1

Paziņojums par asistenta vakanci — Atsauce: Conseil/B/025

1

Eiropas Centrālā banka

2005/C 278A/2

Ģenerāldirektora vietnieka vakance Juridiskajā ģenerāldirektorātā

2

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

III Paziņojumi

Padome

| 11.11.2005 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2005

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 278/1

---

PAZIŅOJUMS PAR ASISTENTA VAKANCI

Atsauce: Conseil/B/025

(2005/C 278 A/01)

Eiropas Savienības Padomes Ģenerālsekretariāts meklē pagaidu darbiniekus:

| — | divām B* kategorijas 3. pakāpes (AST 3) amata vietām – Conseil/B/025 |
| --- | --- |

—

divām B* kategorijas 3. pakāpes (AST 3) amata vietām – Conseil/B/025

darbam Drošības biroja Misiju aizsardzības dienestā.

Sīkāku informāciju var iegūt, sazinoties ar Darbā pieņemšanas dienestu pa šādu e-pasta adresi:

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

vai dienesta interneta vietnē

http://ue.eu.int/concours

Pieteikšanās termiņš: 2005. gada 2. decembris (pasta zīmogs).

---

Eiropas Centrālā banka

| 11.11.2005 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 278/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2005

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 278/2

---

ĢENERĀLDIREKTORA VIETNIEKA VAKANCE JURIDISKAJĀ

ĢENERĀLDIREKTORĀTĀ

(2005/C 278 A/02)

Eiropas Centrālā banka izsludina konkursu uz vakanto ģenerāldirektora vietnieka amatu Juridiskajā ģenerāldirektorātā. Sīkāku informāciju par pretendentam izvirzītajām prasībām un amata pienākumiem, kā arī pieteikšanās kārtību sk. ECB interneta lapā www.ecb.int (sadaļā “Darba iespējas”).

---
§ 3809.802 What must I include in my appeal to OHA? ( a ) Your written appeal must contain: ( 1 ) Your name and address; and
( 2 ) The BLM serial number of the notice or plan of operations that is the subject of the appeal.
( b ) You must submit a statement of your reasons for the appeal and any arguments you wish to present that would justify reversal or modification of the decision within the time frame specified in part 4 of this chapter (usually within 30 calendar days after filing your appeal).
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: January

8 , 201 5 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Joe Bry son , EPA

– O AR, OAP, CPPD/IO SUBJECT: January

8, 2015 Meeting/Call with Conservation Services Group (CSG) and The Climate Registry

(TCR) Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** On January

8, 2015 , EPA - OAR/OAP met with Pat Stanton of CSG and David Rosenheim of TCR to solicit in formation on energy efficiency registries and their potential application to the Clean Power Plan for existing power plants. **ATTENDEES** Pat Stanton, CSG David Rosenheim, TCR (by phone) Lars Kvale, APX Joe Bry son, EPA - OAR/OAP Beth Conlin, EPA - OAR/OAP Stacy Angel, EPA - OAR/OAP Jeremy Schreifels, EPA - OAR/OAP Meg Victor, EPA - OAR/OAP Chris Sherry , EPA - OAR/OAP Matt Clouse, EPA - OAR/OAP Niko Dietsch, EPA - OAR/OAP
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3636]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on October 1, 2004, I find that Hunterdon, Mercer, Sussex, and Warren Counties in the State of New Jersey constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by Tropical Depression Ivan occurring on September 18, 2004, and continuing. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on November 30, 2004 and for economic injury until the close of business on July 1, 2005 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 1 Office, 360 Rainbow Blvd., South 3rd Fl., Niagara Falls, NY 14303-1192. In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed until the specified date at the above location: Burlington, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Passaic, and Somerset in the State of New Jersey; Orange County in the State of New York; and Bucks, Monroe, Northampton, and Pike Counties in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Mercer, Sussex, and Warren Counties in the State of New Jersey are also eligible under Public Assistance and our disaster loan program is available for private non-profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature in those counties. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with credit available elsewhere
6.375Homeowners without credit available elsewhere
3.187Businesses with credit available elsewhere
5.800Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
2.900Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere
4.875For Economic Injury:Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere
2.900
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 363608. For economic injury the number is 9AD600 for New Jersey; 9AD700 for New York; and 9AD800 for Pennsylvania. The Public Assistance number assigned to New Jersey is P06108. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) Dated: October 5, 2004. Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 04-22933 Filed 10-12-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### PART II—TAX ON CORPORATIONS

Sec.
11.
Tax imposed.
12.
Cross references relating to tax on corporations.
#### § 3871.4 Patent proceedings stayed when adverse claim is filed; exception.

When an adverse claim is filed as aforesaid, the authorized officer will endorse upon the same the precise date of filing and preserve a record of the date of notifications issued thereon; and thereafter all proceedings on the application for patent will be stayed with the exception of the completion of the publication and posting of notices and plat and the filing of the necessary proof thereof, until the controversy shall have been finally adjudicated in court or the adverse claim waiver or withdrawn.