60604 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 12, 2004 / Proposed Rules 

simplify the application and process for 

the second and third year grant 

continuations?

Definitions: How should we define 

‘‘community needs?’’ How should we 

define a Learn and Serve America 

‘‘participant’’ for elementary/secondary 

education and for higher education 

programs? How should we define a 

‘‘service hour?’’ How should we clarify 

the definition of ‘‘youth and adult 

volunteers’’ who provide service along 

with Learn and Serve America program 

participants? How should we define a 

‘‘subgrantee?’’ Should Grant Making 

Entities (grantees that must serve 

multiple states in order to be eligible for 

funding) be defined as providing service 

in two or more states from the beginning 

of the grant, or prospectively at any 

point during the grant period? Should 

this definition be the same for Schoolbased and Community-based grantee 

organizations? 

Teacher Education Grants: Should we 

require that Learn and Serve America 

grantee teacher education programs 

prepare prospective teachers to use 

service-learning in their classroom/

teaching practices? 

Intergenerational Activities: How 

should the Corporation promote the use 

of service-learning practices and models 

that utilize multiple generations? For 

example, should we require that Learn 

and Serve America higher education 

programs serving children include a 

component in which children serve 

with higher education student 

participants? 

Adult and Youth Volunteers: How 

should the Corporation promote the 

recruitment of adult and youth 

volunteers who work with Learn and 

Serve America participant students in 

meeting community needs? How should 

we encourage the participation of adult 

volunteers who have particular 

expertise in meeting the community 

needs focused on by the Learn and 

Serve America projects? How should we 

encourage the participation of 

elementary/secondary student 

participants’ family members? 

Community Organization 

Partnerships: What steps should the 

Corporation take to strengthen the role 

of community organizations as partners 

in Learn and Serve America projects? 

What steps should we take to promote 

greater participation of faith-based and 

small community organizations? 

Project Expenditures: Should Learn 

and Serve America grantees be required 

to include evaluation funding in their 

project budgets, along with stipulation 

of the scope and method of evaluations? 

Should we require that web 

conferencing capabilities be included in 

the grant budget? 

Performance measures and 

evaluation: How can the Corporation 

and its Learn and Serve America 

grantees ensure that all Learn and Serve 

America programs are setting and 

achieving appropriate, measurable 

performance outcome goals? Should we 

require that Learn and Serve America 

grantees and subgrantees establish and 

meet a common set of outcome 

measures? How can the Corporation 

ensure that its grantees regularly and 

effectively evaluate their servicelearning programs? 

Unified State Plans: What role, if any, 

should Learn and Serve America 

grantees and subgrantees play within 

the Corporation’s Unified State Plans? 

How should Learn and Serve America 

grantees and subgrantees be encouraged 

to participate in Unified State Plans and 

state-wide service conferences? 

Conference Calls and Public Input 

Meetings 

The Corporation is planning two 

conference calls and two public input 

meetings in October. Please check our 

National Service-Learning 

Clearinghouse Web site at http://

www.servicelearning.org for further 

information regarding these conference 

calls and public input meetings or 

contact Pat Carpenter at (202) 606–5000, 

ext. 209 (pcarpenter@cns.gov).

Conference Calls 

October 14—10:30 a.m. 

October 15—3:30 p.m. 

To register for the calls, please contact 

Pat Carpenter at pcarpenter@cns.gov.

The time for both calls is eastern time. 

Public Input Meetings 

October 13 from 2–4 p.m. Rabb Room, 

University College of Citizenship and 

Public Service, Tufts University, 

Medford, MA. 

October 14 from noon–2 p.m. One 

Dupont Circle, Conference Room C, 

Level 1B, Washington, DC. 

The time for both meetings is eastern 

time. We strongly encourage you to 

attend in person if you are in the Boston 

and DC areas, and ask that you RSVP to 

Pat Carpenter at pcarpenter@cns.gov.

Dated: October 7, 2004. 

Frank R. Trinity, 

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 04–22951 Filed 10–8–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6050–$$–U

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 04–3055; MB Docket No. 04–380; RM–

11069] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; Corydon 

and Lanesville, IN

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: This document requests 

comments on a petition for rulemaking 

filed by Blue Chip Broadcasting 

Licenses II, Ltd., licensee of Station 

WGZB–FM, Corydon, Indiana proposing 

the reallotment of Channel 243A from 

Corydon, Indiana to Lanesville, Indiana, 

as the community’s first local 

transmission service, and the 

modification of the license for Station 

WGZB–FM to reflect the changes. The 

coordinates for Channel 243A at 

Lanesville are 38–12–52 NL and 86–01–

00 WL, the same as those currently used 

by WGZB–FM at Corydon.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or 

before November 18, 2004, and reply 

comments on or before December 3, 

2004.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 

Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20554. In addition to filing comments 

with the FCC, interested parties should 

serve the petitioner’s counsel as follows: 

Evan S. Henschel, Esq., Wiley Rein & 

Fielding LLP, 1776 K Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Helen McLean, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2738.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 

04–380, adopted September 23, 2004, 

and released September 27, 2004. The 

full text of this Commission decision is 

available for inspection and copying 

during normal business hours in the 

FCC’s Reference Information Center at 

Portals II, CY–A257, 445 Twelfth Street, 

SW., Washington, DC. This document 

may also be purchased from the 

Commission’s duplicating contractors, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 

Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–

800–378–3160 or http://

www.BCPIWEB.com.

Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. 

Members of the public should note 

that from the time a Notice of Proposed

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 12, 2004 / Proposed Rules 60605

Rule Making is issued until the matter 

is no longer subject to Commission 

consideration or court review, all ex 

parte contacts are prohibited in 

Commission proceedings, such as this 

one, which involve channel allotments. 

See 47 CFR § 1.1204(b) for rules 

governing permissible ex parte contacts. 

For information regarding proper 

filing procedures for comments, see 47 

CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting.

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR 

Part 73 as follows:

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

1. The authority citation for Part 73 

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.

§ 73.202 [Amended] 

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM 

Allotments under Indiana, is amended 

by removing Channel 243A at Corydon 

and by adding Lanesville, Channel 

243A.

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media 

Bureau.

[FR Doc. 04–22879 Filed 10–8–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 04–3010; MB Docket No. 04–367; RM–

11070] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; Genoa, 

CO; Security, CO

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: This document requests 

comments on a petition for rulemaking 

filed by Optima Communications, Inc. 

requesting the substitution of Channel 

288C2 for Channel 288C3 at Security, 

Colorado and the modification of 

Station KSKX(FM)’s license 

accordingly. The coordinates for 

Channel 288C2 at Security are 38–37–30 

NL and 104–49–00 WL. There is a site 

restriction 16.12 kilometers (10 miles) 

southwest of the community. To 

accommodate the proposal, petitioner 

requests the substitution of Channel 

291C3 for vacant Channel 288C3 at 

Genoa, Colorado. The coordinates for 

Channel 291C3 at Genoa are 39–15–35 

NL and 103–17–15 WL with a site 

restriction 18.4 kilometers (11.4 miles) 

east of the community.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or 

before November 15, 2004, and reply 

comments on or before November 30, 

2004.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 

Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20554. In addition to filing comments 

with the FCC, interested parties should 

serve the petitioner as follows: Optima 

Communications, Inc., c/o Mark N. 

Lipp, Esq., Vinson & Elkins, L.L.P., The 

Willard Office Building, 1455 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20004–1008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Helen McLean, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2738.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 

367, adopted September 22, 2004, and 

released September 24, 2004. The full 

text of this Commission notice is 

available for inspection and copying 

during normal business hours in the 

FCC’s Reference Information Center at 

Portals II, CY–A257, 445 Twelfth Street, 

SW., Washington, DC. This document 

may also be purchased from the 

Commission’s duplicating contractors, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 

Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone

1–800–378–3160 or http://

www.BCPIWEB.com.

Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. 

Members of the public should note 

that from the time a Notice of Proposed 

Rule Making is issued until the matter 

is no longer subject to Commission 

consideration or court review, all ex 

parte contacts are prohibited in 

Commission proceedings, such as this 

one, which involve channel allotments. 

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules 

governing permissible ex parte contacts. 

For information regarding proper 

filing procedures for comments, see 47 

CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting.

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR 

part 73 as follows:

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.

§ 73.202 [Amended] 

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM 

Allotments under Colorado, is amended 

by removing Channel 288C3 and by 

adding Channel 291C3 at Genoa; by 

removing Channel 288C3 and by adding 

Channel 288C2 at Security.

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media 

Bureau.

[FR Doc. 04–22880 Filed 10–8–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service 

50 CFR Part 17 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a 

Petition To Delist the Ute Ladies’-

Tresses Orchid and Initiation of a

5-Year Review

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (Service), announce a 

90-day finding on a petition to remove 

the Ute ladies’-tresses orchid 

(Spiranthes diluvialis) from the Federal 

List of Endangered and Threatened 

Wildlife and Plants pursuant to the 

Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 

amended (Act). We find that the petition 

presents substantial information and are 

initiating a status review to determine if 

delisting this species is warranted. We 

are requesting submission of any new 

information (best scientific and 

commercial data) on the Ute ladies’-

tresses orchid since its original listing as 

a threatened species in 1992. 

Following this status review, we will 

issue a 12-month finding on the petition 

to delist. Because a status review is also 

required for the 5-year review of listed 

species under section 4(c)(2)(A) of the 

Act, we are electing to prepare these 

reviews simultaneously. At the 

conclusion of these simultaneous 

reviews, we will issue the 12-month 

finding on the petition, as provided in 

section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act, and make 

the requisite finding under section 

4(c)(2)(B) of the Act based on the results 

of the 5-year review.