alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This orderis nonprecedential. 

# Wntteb**~tate~**

# ([ourtof**~peaI~** 

# for !be jf 

# eberaI([trrutt

EMONDAWKINS, Claimant-Appellant,


### v. ERIC K. 

### SHINSEKI, SECRETARYOFVETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.

2012-7105
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 09-665, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel.



### ONMOTION

Before LOURIE, SCHALL and DYK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 

### ORDER Emon Dawkins responds to the court's May 14, 2012 order requiring him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. The Secretary ofVeterans Affairs ("Secretary") also responds, which this courtDAWKINS v. SHINSEKI 2 construes as a motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims entered judgment in this case on February 2, 2012. The court received Dawkins's notice of appeal on April 5, 2012, 63 days after the date ofthejudgment. Any appeal from the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must be received within 60 days of the date of entry of judgment. 38 U.S.C. 

### § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. 

### § 2107(b); Fed. 

### R. App. P. 4(a)(I). The statutory deadline for taking an appeal to this court is jurisdictional and mandatory. 

### See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007); 

### see also Henderson v. Shinseki, 131 S. Ct. 1197, 1204-05 (2011) (noting Congress's intent to impose the same jurisdictional restrictions on an appeal from the Veterans Court to the Federal Circuit as on an appeal from a district courtto a court ofappeals). Dawkins argues that his late filing was due to his inability to receive legal advice. However, this court "has no authority to create equitable exceptions to jurisdictional requirements," even ifsuch "rigorous rules

... are thought to be inequitable[.]" 

### Bowles, 551 U.S. at 214. Because this appealwas not received within the statutory period, we must dismiss. Accordingly, 

### ITIs ORDERED

### THAT: (1) The motionis granted. The appealis dismissed. (2) Each side shallbearitsowncosts.


## AUG 02 2m2 Date FORTHE COURT lsIJan Horbaly JanHorbaly Clerk



## u.s.

## COUl\n~'l~PEAlSU1TfOR THE FEDERALeiRe



## AUG 

## 022012 JANHORBALY CLERK3 DAWKINS V. SHINSEKI

cc: Emon Dawkins Richard Schroeder, Esq. s25
No. 14,831.

#### Kamp et al. *v.*Ficcio.

(106 P. [2d] 1066)

Decided September 23, 1940.

Rehearing denied October 21, 1940.

Mr. Clarence Eynon, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Benjamin C. Hilliard, Jr., Mr. George A. Trout, Mr. Bart W. O’Hara, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed en banc on application for supersedeas without written opinion. Mr. Justice Francis E. Bouck and Mr. Justice Young not participating.
## Patent essentials

Here you’ll find what you need to know if you know nothing about patents. We’ll take you from “What is a patent?” to assistance with the application process.

                            - Basic questions about patents
                            - Foreign patents and treaties
                            - Inventor assistance
                            - Functions of the agency

## Applying for patents

This section dives into more detail about how you can apply for a patent. It covers legal representation, deadlines, fees, and other essential parts of the process.

                            - Search for patents
                            - Attorneys and agents
                            - Types of patents
                            - Types of applications
                            - Examination process
                            - Ready to file

## Managing your patent

Here we take you from being successfully granted a patent to maintaining your rights. You’ll learn how to maintain, enforce, transfer, and protect your rights.

                            - Nature of rights
                            - Patent marking
                            - Term extensions
                            - Maintenance fees
                            - Corrections
                            - Ownership
                            - Assignments and licenses
                            - Infringement

### Helpful resources for new customers

Access free patent services

Review online patent tools

Overview of the patent process

Identify if you have a patent

                              - Events
                              - News

One-day trademarks boot camp

One-day trademarks boot camp

One-day trademarks boot camp 

*event*More events

There are no recent news items for this topic.

*mail*Subscribe*feed*More news

Video

Introduction to the Patent Pro Bono Program

Featured event

Sign up today to attend a Path to a Patent session

IP Identifier

Learn the type of intellectual property you have and how to protect it

Navigating the IP process

Find resources for small businesses and entrepreneurs
§ 113.545 Pre-employment inquiries. ( a ) *Marital status.* A recipient shall not make pre-employment inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for employment, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.”
( b ) *Sex.* A recipient may make pre-employment inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for employment, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
p . 1 d ,q-TT/XN- x4t7/,Ji 3
UN ITED STATES D ISTRICT COU RT

SO UTHERN D ISTRICT O F FLORID A

CA SE N O . 20-CR-2228-JJO

UN ITED STA TES O F A M ERICA ,

Plaintiff,

Fl LED B' Y D.C .

Mlq p 3 2222

ANG'G :. NO:LE

ebM : b @ D1R CQ :

. p. o: Fuk. AMIAMI

VS .

FELIPE M ON CALEA N O BO TERO ,

Defendant.

NO TIC E O F PER M A NEN T A PPEA R AN CE A N D

DESIG NA TIO N O F E-M AIL A DD R ESSES

PLEASE TAKE N OTICE that Kendall Coffey and Fernando Tamayo of the law filnn of

Coffey Burlington, P.L., attom eys adm itted to practice before this Court, hereby enter their

pennanent appearance as counsel for Defendant Felipe M oncaleano Botero (klDefendanf'). A1l

further pleadings, correspondence, and/or documents of any kind filed in this proceeding should

be furnished by Notice of Electronic Filing generated by CM /ECF to the undersigned.

FURTHER, the following e-mail addresses are hereby designated for service upon

Defendant by e-mail:

kcoffey@coffeyburlington.com

Ramayo@coffeyburlington.com

lmaltz@coffeyburlington.com

sewice@ coffeyburlington.com

cofrFE'y I BURLINGTON

2601 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse, Miami, FL 331 33 ' T. 305.858.2900 F. 305.858.5261

Case 1:20-cr-20175-JEM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2020 Page 1 of 2
CA SE N O . 20-CR-2228

Dated: M arch 3, 2020.

Respectfully subm itted,

COFFEY BURLINGTO N, P.L.

Counselfor Fc/I>: Moncaleano Botero

2601 South Bayshore D rive, Penthouse

M iam i, Florida 33133

Tel: 305- 8- 900

jy-. sy :

Kendall Coffey, F a. Bar No. 259861

Fernando Tam ayo, Fla. Bar N o. 28530

kcoffey@coffeyburlington.com

Aamayo@coffeyburlington.com

lmaltz@coffeyburlington.com

sewice@coffeyburlington.com

C ER TIFIC A TE O F SERV IC E

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by Notice

of Electronic Filing generated by CM /ECF, on M arch 3, 2020, on all counsel or parties of record

on the Service List below.

SERV ICE LIST

Ariana Fajardo Orshan

Counselfor United States ofAmerica

United States Attom ey's Office

99 N .E. Fourth Street

M iam i, Florida 33132

Tel: 305-961-9100

arira.fajardo.orshr @usdoj.gov

By:

4':Kendall co fey

2

COFFEY l BURLINGTON

2601 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse, Miami, FL 33133 . T. 305.858.2900 F. 305*858.5261

Case 1:20-cr-20175-JEM Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2020 Page 2 of 2
CCC-1325516

**CGC-15~1~49** f -=:.--::"-- 

# ,,, Allied Roofing

**~~~** And Sheet Metal 

### -~-- **:= =**  9

54 

# 485-5922 www.a\\\edroof\ng.cc
----

----

III Πληροφορίες

Συμβούλιο

----

ΔΗΜΟΣΊΕΥΣΗ ΠΡΟΚΉΡΥΞΗΣ ΚΕΝΉΣ ΘΈΣΗΣ ΒΟΗΘΟΫ

Αναφορά: Συμβούλιο/Β/025

(2005/C 278 A/01)

Η Γενική Γραμματεία του Συμβουλίου της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης σκοπεύει να προβεί στην πλήρωση, με σύμβαση εκτάκτου υπαλλήλου:

στο Τμήμα Προστασίας Αποστολών της Υπηρεσίας Ασφαλείας.

Για περισσότερες πληροφορίες, παρακαλούνται οι ενδιαφερόμενοι να απευθύνονται στην Υπηρεσία Προσλήψεων στην ακόλουθη ηλεκτρονική διεύθυνση:

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

ή στην ιστοσελίδα της ίδιας υπηρεσίας, στη διεύθυνση:

http://ue.eu.int/concours

Προθεσμία: 2 Δεκεμβρίου 2005 (την ημερομηνία πιστοποιεί η ταχυδρομική σφραγίδα).

----

Ευρωπαϊκή Κεντρική Τράπεζα

----

ΠΡΟΚΉΡΥΞΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΠΛΉΡΩΣΗ ΘΈΣΗΣ ΣΤΗ ΓΕΝΙΚΉ ΔΙΕΫΘΥΝΣΗ ΝΟΜΙΚΏΝ ΥΠΗΡΕΣΙΏΝ

Αναπληρωτής Γενικός Διευθυντής Νομικών Υπηρεσιών

(2005/C 278 Α/02)

Η Ευρωπαϊκή Κεντρική Τράπεζα δέχεται την υποβολή αιτήσεων υποψηφιότητας για την πλήρωση της θέσης του αναπληρωτή Γενικού Διευθυντή Νομικών Υπηρεσιών. Περισσότερες πληροφορίες σχετικά με τα απαιτούμενα προσόντα, τα καθήκοντα που περιλαμβάνει η θέση, καθώς και τον τρόπο υποβολής των αιτήσεων, διατίθενται στο δικτυακό τόπο της ΕΚΤ στη διεύθυνση www.ecb.int (ενότητα «Job opportunities»).

----
§ 4.1190 Initiation of proceedings. ( a ) A proceeding on a show cause order issued by the Director of OSM pursuant to section 521(a)(4) of the Act shall be initiated by the Director of OSM filing a copy of such an order with the Hearings Division, OHA, promptly after the order is issued to the permittee.
( b ) A show cause order filed with OHA shall set forth— ( 1 ) A list of the unwarranted or willful violations which contribute to a pattern of violations;
( 2 ) A copy of each order or notice which contains one or more of the violations listed as contributing to a pattern of violations;
( 3 ) The basis for determining the existence of a pattern or violations; and
( 4 ) Recommendations whether the permit should be suspended or revoked, including the length and terms of a suspension.
[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 67 FR 4368, Jan. 30, 2002; 67 FR 61510, Oct. 1, 2002; 88 FR 5795, Jan. 30, 2023]
§ 3836.27 When must I complete my deferred assessment work? ( a ) You may begin the deferred assessment work any time after the deferment ends. However, you must complete it before the end of the following assessment year. For example, if your deferment ends on July 15, 2008, you must complete all the deferred assessment work by September 1, 2009, in addition to completing the regular assessment work due on that date.
( b ) You may also choose to pay the annual maintenance fees for the years deferred instead of performing the deferred assessment work.
#### § 3471.4 Future interest, acquired lands.

An application to lease lands in which the United States has a future interest filed more than 2 years prior to the date of the vesting in the United States of the interest in the coal shall be rejected. Any application for a future interest lease outstanding at the time of the vesting in the United States of the present possessory interest in the coal shall not lapse, but shall continue to be treated under subpart 3425 of this title. (See 43 CFR 3472.1-2(g).)

[44 FR 42643, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33149, July 30, 1982]
§ 3832.1 What does it mean to locate mining claims or sites? ( a ) Locating a mining claim or site means: ( 1 ) Establishing the exterior lines of a mining claim or site on lands open to mineral entry to identify the exact land claimed; and
( 2 ) Recording a notice or certificate of location as required by state and Federal law and by this part.
( b ) You will find— ( 1 ) Location requirements in this part;
( 2 ) Recording requirements in part 3833 of this chapter;
( 3 ) Requirements for transferring an interest in a mining claim or site in § 3833.30 of this chapter; and
( 4 ) Annual fee requirements for mining claims and sites in parts 3834, 3835, and 3836 of this chapter.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

Case Number: 20-14123-CIV-MARTINEZ-MA YNARD 

SHERRYL NATALIE MEDINA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner, 

Social Security Administration, 

Defendant. 

I - ---------------

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable Shaniek K. Maynard, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation on Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees. 

(ECF No. 29). Magistrate Judge Maynard filed a Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 30), 

recommending that Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees, be granted pursuant to the Equal Access 

to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and Plaintiff be awarded $7,805.12 in attorney's fees, $400.00 

in costs, $19.20 in expenses, and $12.00 in paralegal fees. (See id. at 5). 

The Court has reviewed the entire file and record, and notes that no objections have been 

filed. Accordingly, after careful consideration, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that 

1. United States Magistrate Judge Reinhart's Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 30), 

is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. 

2. Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney 's Fees, (ECF No. 29), is GRANTED. Plaintiff is 

awarded $7,805.12 in attorney's fees, $400.00 in costs, $19.20 in expenses, and $12.00 

in paralegal fees. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ~ ay of February, 2022. 

Copies provided to: 

Magistrate Judge Maynard 

All Counsel of Record 

JOSE . MARTINEZ 

UNIT D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:20-cv-14123-JEM Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2022 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John E. Sharland, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of LSB Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered in this report based on such evaluation and; c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting and; 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrants auditors and the Audit
Committee of registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting. Date: March 18, 2005 /s/ John E. SharlandJohn E. SharlandSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Brisam Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian
Kitts, Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:   March
24, 2009





/s/ Brian
Kitts


Brian
Kitts,


Principal
Executive Officer and


Principal
Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 20-61119-CIV-AMC/HUNT

VSI SALES, LLC, a Pennsylvania 

limited liability company, STRUCTURES U.S. 

LLC, a Kentucky limited liability Company, and 

STRUCTURES U.S.A., LLC, a Kentucky limited 

liability company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ANTHONY DISIMONE, an individual,

ANGELA DISIMONE, an individual, and

ENGINEERED POLE STRUCTURES, LLC, a

Florida limited liability company, 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

NOTICE OF FILING PROPOSED ORDER SCHEDULING MEDIATION

Plaintiffs VSI SALES, LLC, STRUCTURES U.S. LLC, and STRUCTURES U.S.A., LLC; 

and Counterclaim Defendants NOVA STRUCTURES, INC. and NOVA U.S., INC.; and 

Defendants ANTHONY DISIMONE, ANGELA DISIMONE, and ENGINEERED POLE 

STRUCTURES, LLC, by their respective undersigned counsel, hereby file the parties’ proposed 

Order Scheduling Mediation.

 /s/ Bernardo Burstein

Bernardo Burstein, Esq. (Bar No.972207) Eric Lee, Esq. (Bar No. 961299)

Burstein & Assoc., P.A. Lee & Amtzis, P.L.

bburstein@bursteinpa.com lee@leeamlaw.com

13744 Biscayne Boulevard 5550 Glades Rd., Ste. 401

N. Miami Beach, FL 33181 Boca Raton, FL 33431

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendants

and Counterclaim Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs

VSI SALES, LLC ANTHONY DISIMONE

STRUCTURES U.S. LLC ANGELA DISIMONE

STRUCTURES U.S.A., LLC ENGINEERED POLE 

NOVA STRUCTURES, INC. STRUCTURES,LLC

NOVA U.S., INC.

Case 0:20-cv-61119-AMC Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/08/2021 Page 1 of 3
CASE NO.: 20-61119-CIV-AMC/HUNT

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the 

Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this 

day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner 

specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some 

other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive 

electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

Dated: March 8, 2021

 

ERIC LEE (Bar No. 961299)

lee@leeamlaw.com

Lee & Amtzis, P.L.

5550 Glades Road, Suite 401

Boca Raton, FL 33431

Telephone: (561) 981-9988

Attorneys for Defendants

ANTHONY DISIMONE

ANGELA DISIMONE

ENGINEERED POLE STRUCTURES, LLC

Case 0:20-cv-61119-AMC Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/08/2021 Page 2 of 3
CASE NO.: 20-61119-CIV-AMC/HUNT

3

SERVICE LIST

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants

VSI SALES, LLC

STRUCTURES U.S. LLC

STRUCTURES U.S.A., LLC

NOVA STRUCTURES, INC.

NOVA U.S., INC.

Burstein & Assoc., P.A.

Bernardo Burstein, Esq.

bburstein@bursteinpa.com

bursteinandassociates@gmail.com

13744 Biscayne Boulevard

N. Miami Beach, FL 33181

Case 0:20-cv-61119-AMC Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/08/2021 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22859]



[[Page 60703]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

[REG-251520-96]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Regulation Project; 
Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to a notice and request 
for comments, which was published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, 
September 14, 2004 (69 FR 55492). This notice relates to a comment 
request on proposed collection for regulation project.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allan Hopkins, (202) 622-6665 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The notice and request for comments that is the subject of this 
correction is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public 
Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).

Need for Correction

    As published, the comment request for regulation project contains 
errors which may prove to be misleading and are need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the comment request for regulation 
project, which were the subject of FR Doc. 04-20618, are corrected as 
follows:
    1. On page 55492, column 3, under the caption ``SUMMARY:'', lines 
13 and 14, the language, ``existing notice of proposed rulemaking and 
temporary regulation, REG-251520-'' is corrected to read ``existing 
final regulation, REG-251520-''.
    2. On page 55492, column 3, under the caption ``SUMMARY:'', lines 
17 thru 18, the language, ``Programs Redeterminations (Sections 1.861-
18 and 1.861-18(k)).'' is corrected to read ``Programs and 
Redeterminations (Section 1.861-18).''
    3. On page 55493, column 1, under the caption `SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION:', the language,
    ``Estimated Number of Respondents: 1.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1.''

is corrected to read ``The burden for the collection of information in 
this regulation is reflected in the burden of Form 3115.''

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 04-22859 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P