alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 45.60 What are the requirements for the ALJ's decision? ( a ) *Timing.* The ALJ must issue a decision within the shorter of the following time periods: ( 1 ) 30 days after the close of the hearing under § 45.58; or
( 2 ) 120 days after the effective date stated in the referral notice under § 45.26(c)(4), 7 CFR 1.626(c)(4), or 50 CFR 221.26(c)(4).
( b ) *Content.* ( 1 ) The decision must contain: ( i ) Findings of fact on all disputed issues of material fact;
( ii ) Conclusions of law necessary to make the findings of fact (such as rulings on materiality and on the admissibility of evidence); and
( iii ) Reasons for the findings and conclusions.
( 2 ) The ALJ may adopt any of the findings of fact proposed by one or more of the parties.
( 3 ) The decision will not contain conclusions as to whether any preliminary condition or prescription should be adopted, modified, or rejected, or whether any proposed alternative should be accepted or rejected.
( c ) *Service.* Promptly after issuing his or her decision, the ALJ must: ( 1 ) Serve the decision on each party to the hearing;
( 2 ) Prepare a list of all documents that constitute the complete record for the hearing process (including the decision) and certify that the list is complete; and
( 3 ) Forward to FERC the complete record for the hearing process, along with the certified list prepared under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, for inclusion in the record for the license proceeding. Materials received in electronic form, *e.g.,* as attachments to electronic mail, should be transmitted to FERC in electronic form. However, for cases in which a settlement was reached prior to a decision, the entire record need not be transmitted to FERC. In such situations, only the initial pleadings (hearing requests with attachments, any notices of intervention and response, answers, and referral notice) and any dismissal order of the ALJ need be transmitted.
( d ) *Finality.* The ALJ's decision under this section with respect to the disputed issues of material fact will not be subject to further administrative review. To the extent the ALJ's decision forms the basis for any condition or prescription subsequently included in the license, it may be subject to judicial review under 16 U.S.C. 825 l (b).
#### In the Matter of Carmine Pizza, Appellant, against John A. Lyons, as New York State Commissioner of Correction, et al., Respondents.

Memorandum: The only issue raised by this appeal is whether or not compensation time earned by the appellant on his first sentence, prior to his parole, should have been credited to him in reduction *748of the maximum of that sentence so as to decrease the time he was required to serve on that sentence when he was returned to prison on his second conviction. We agree with the decision of the Special Term that “ The law in effect at the *time*of petitioner’s conviction and of his parole provided only for reduction of the minimum term, not the maximum.” (See *People ex rel. Pershing*v. *Wilson,*259 App. Div. 957, revg. 174 Misc. 191.) All concur. (The order denies petitioner’s prayer for relief and remands him to the custody of the warden.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Me Cum, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
§ 108.503 NMVC Company's adoption of an approved valuation policy. ( a ) *Valuation guidelines.* You must prepare, document and report the valuations of your Loans and Investments in accordance with the Valuation Guidelines for SBICs issued by SBA. These guidelines may be obtained from SBA's Investment Division.
( b ) *SBA approval of valuation policy.* You must have a written valuation policy approved by SBA for use in determining the value of your Loans and Investments. You must either: ( 1 ) Adopt without change the model valuation policy set forth in section III of the Valuation Guidelines for SBICs; or
( 2 ) Obtain SBA's prior written approval of an alternative valuation policy.
( c ) *Responsibility for valuations.* Your board of directors, managing members, or general partner(s) will be solely responsible for adopting your valuation policy and for using it to prepare valuations of your Loans and Investments for submission to SBA. If SBA reasonably believes that your valuations, individually or in the aggregate, are materially misstated, it reserves the right to require you to engage, at your expense, an independent third party acceptable to SBA to substantiate the valuations.
( d ) *Frequency of valuations.* ( 1 ) You must value your Loans and Investments at the end of the second quarter of your fiscal year, and at the end of your fiscal year.
( 2 ) On a case-by-case basis, SBA may require you to perform valuations more frequently.
( 3 ) You must report material adverse changes in valuations at least quarterly, within thirty days following the close of the quarter.
( e ) *Review of valuations by independent public accountant.* ( 1 ) For valuations performed as of the end of your fiscal year, your independent public accountant must review your valuation procedures and the implementation of such procedures, including adequacy of documentation.
( 2 ) The independent public accountant's report on your audited annual financial statements (SBA Form 468) must include a statement that your valuations were prepared in accordance with your approved valuation policy.
#### Preston *v.*Dozier.

Holden, J.

1. Where a bank to which a cheek on another bank is presented for payment requires the payee to procure a third person to indorse the check, and this is done, and the bank to which the check is presented then cashes it for the payee on the faith of this indorsement, which is neither necessary nor proper for the transmission of title to the check *26in the negotiation thereof, but is for the sole purpose of guaranteeing payment of the cheek, such indorser becomes a surety thereon. *Sibley*v. *Bank,*97 *Ga.*126 (25 S. E. 470) *; Atkinson*v. *Bennet,*103 *Ga.*508 (30 S. E. 599) ; *Buck*v. *Bank,*104 *Ga.*660 (30 S. E. 872) ; *Ridley*v. *Hightower,*112 *Ga.*476 (37 S. E. 733).

August 10, 1910.

Complaint. Before Judge Reagan. Butts superior court. February 18, 1909.

*John R. L. Smith,*for plaintiff in error.

*Henry M. Fletcher,*contra.

*(a)*In order to bind a^ surety, it is not necessary to give him the notice of dishonor and protest provided for by Civil Code, § 3688, in respect to indorsers of promissory notes and bills of exchange. *Sibley*v. *Bank,*supra.

2. Even if the cashier who paid the check, as agent of the defendant in error, who was a banker, was without 'authority to pay it with the funds of his principal, his action in so doing was ratified by the defendant in error, who brought suit on the check in his own name.

■3. Under the pleadings; and the undisputed evidence showing that the defendant in error through his agent cashed the check, on which the plaintiff in error was surety, and which was never paid, there was no error in directing a verdict against the plaintiff in error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beck, J., absent, The other Justices concur.*
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit
No. 02-2340 IN RE BOSTON HERALD, INC., Petitioner. No. 02-2098 UNITED STATES, v. JOHN J. CONNOLLY, JR., Defendant, Appellee. BOSTON HERALD, INC. Intervenor, Appellant. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO, AND APPEAL FROM, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge ]



### Before Lynch, Lipez, and Howard, Circuit Judges . Elizabeth A. Ritvo with whom M. Robert Dushman , Jeffrey P. Hermes , and Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels LLP were on brief for petitioner-appellant. A ndrew Nathanson with whom Tracy A. Miner , John J. Ta ngney , Jr. , and M intz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. were on brief for respondent-appellee (John J. Connolly, Jr.). February 26, 2003
**Exhibit 23.1**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Max Capital Group Ltd.: 

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-151211, No. 333-150660, No. 333-131951, and No. 333-69092) on Forms S-8 of Max Capital Group Ltd. of our reports dated February 16, 2010, with respectto the consolidated balance sheets of Max Capital Group Ltd. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of theyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and all related financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Max Capital Group Ltd. 

/s/ KPMG 

Hamilton, Bermuda 

February 16, 2010
§ 3809.331 Under what conditions must I modify my notice? ( a ) You must modify your notice— ( 1 ) If BLM requires you to do so to prevent unnecessary or undue degradation; or
( 2 ) If you plan to make material changes to your operations. Material changes are changes that disturb areas not described in the existing notice; change your reclamation plan; or result in impacts of a different kind, degree, or extent than those described in the existing notice.
( b ) You must submit your notice modification 15 calendar days before making any material changes. If BLM determines your notice modification is complete before the 15-day period has elapsed, BLM may notify you to proceed. When BLM requires you to modify your notice, we may also notify you to proceed before the 15-day period has elapsed to prevent unnecessary or undue degradation.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign of equipment for lunar dust removalNASA has a long range goal of constructing a fully equipped, manned lunar base on the near side of the moon by the year 2015. During the Apollo Missions, lunar dust coated and fouled equipment surfaces and mechanisms exposed to the lunar environment. In addition, the atmosphere and internal surfaces of the lunar excursion module were contaminated by lunar dust which was brought in on articles passed through the airlock. Consequently, the need exists for device or appliance to remove lunar dust from surfaces of material objects used outside of the proposed lunar habitat. Additionally, several concepts were investigated for preventing the accumulation of lunar dust on mechanisms and finished surfaces. The character of the dust and the lunar environment present unique challenges for the removal of contamination from exposed surfaces. In addition to a study of lunar dust adhesion properties, the project examines the use of various energy domains for removing the dust from exposed surfaces. Also, prevention alternatives are examined for systems exposed to lunar dust. A concept utilizing a pressurized gas is presented for dust removal outside of an atmospherically controlled environment. The concept consists of a small astronaut/robotic compatible device which removes dust from contaminated surfaces by a small burst of gas.Document ID19920010136Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBelden, Lacy*(Texas Univ. Austin, TX, United States)*Cowan, Kevin*(Texas Univ. Austin, TX, United States)*Kleespies, Hank*(Texas Univ. Austin, TX, United States)*Ratliff, Ryan*(Texas Univ. Austin, TX, United States)*Shah, Oniell*(Texas Univ. Austin, TX, United States)*Shelburne, Kevin*(Texas Univ. Austin, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:190014NASA-CR-190014Accession Number92N19378Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4435Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920010136.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, John D. Prunty,certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including any consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 c)    disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a)     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)    any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: March 29, 2007                         |
|----------------------------------------------|
|                                         |
| /s/ John D. Prunty                           |   |
| John D. Prunty                               |
| Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer   |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

 

----
**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
   
   In
connection with the Annual Report of GlobeTrac Inc. (“GlobeTrac”) on Form 10-KSB
for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jim Pratt, President
and Chief Executive Officer of GlobeTrac and a member of the Board of Directors,
certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   (1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
   
   ***/s/
Jim Pratt*
 Jim Pratt
 Chief
Executive Officer
   April 15,
2005
    **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
   
   In
connection with the Annual Report of GlobeTrac Inc. (“GlobeTrac”) on Form 10-KSB
for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John daCosta,
Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of GlobeTrac and a member of
the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
   (1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
   
   */s/
John daCosta*
 John
daCosta
 Chief
Financial Officer
   April,
15, 2005
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 27374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11549]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7454]

Determination Under the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 
(Pub. L. 111-212) Concerning the Government of Iraq's Support for the 
Iraq Police Program

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State under 
the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement heading in the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111-212) (``the Act''), 
and the Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I 
hereby determine that, with respect to the $200 million INCLE funds 
made available for implementation, management, security, 
communications, and other expenses related to the Iraqi police program, 
the Government of Iraq supports and is cooperating with such program.
    This Determination shall be reported to Congress and published in 
the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 28, 2010.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State.

    Editorial Note: This document was received in the Office of the 
Federal Register on May 6, 2011.

[FR Doc. 2011-11549 Filed 5-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-17-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     HYENA CAPITAL, INC.  June 30, 1997  financial  statements and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894537
<NAME>                        HYENA CAPITAL, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
§ 8365.2-1 Sanitation. On developed recreation sites and areas, no person shall, unless otherwise authorized: ( a ) Clean fish, game, other food, clothing or household articles at any outdoor hydrant, pump, faucet or fountain, or restroom water faucet;
( b ) Deposit human waste except in toilet or sewage facilities provided for that purpose; or
( c ) Bring an animal into such an area unless the animal is on a leash not longer than 6 feet and secured to a fixed object or under control of a person, or is otherwise physically restricted at all times.
### **Subchapter N—Tax Based on Income From Sources Within or Without the United States**

Part
I.
Source rules and other general rules relating to foreign income.
II.
Nonresident aliens and foreign corporations.
III.
Income from sources without the United States.
IV.
Domestic international sales corporations. 1

V.
International boycott determinations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1012(h)(2)(D), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3503, substituted "Source rules and other general rules relating to foreign income" for "Determination of sources of income" in item for part I.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1064(b), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1653, added item V.

1  Editorially supplied. Part IV added by Pub. L. 92–178 without corresponding amendment of subchapter analysis.
## NHDES

® The State of New Hampshire 

# Department of Environmental Services

Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner Celebrating 25years ofprotecting New Hampshire's environment. July 3, 2012 David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch USEPA New

England, Region I 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA02109-3912 Re: PM2.5 Infrastructure Submittals Dear Mr . Conroy: Your staff are reviewing the Section 110(a) infrastructure submittals made by the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (DES) for the 1997 and 2006 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter smaller than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2,5) . In response to questions from your staff, DES is providing the following information to address the requirements ofparagraphs 110(a)(2)(D) and (G) ofthe Clean Air Act . As Governor Lynch's designee, I certify that New Hampshire is not contributing significantly to the nonattainment or interfering with the maintenance of the 1997 or 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS in any other state. This statement is supported by modeling analyses contained in New Hampshire's 2008Transport SIP. In addition, the states contiguous to NewHampshire are in attainment ofboth the 1997 and 2006 PM2,5 NAAQS. With respect to element G, DES expects New Hampshire to be designated as a Priority III Region under 40 CFR 51 .150, thereby negating the need for a PM2,5 emergency episode plan. Please let me know

if you need additional information or ifyou have any questions. Sincerely, Craig A . Wright Acting Director Air Resources Division

www .des .nh.gov 29 Hazen Drive " PO Box 95 " Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3503 " TDDAccess: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964