alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Theodore Roosevelt
National Park
North Dakota


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Juniper Campground
 **OPEN**

Loading...
Basic Information
Campground Features
Amenities
Fire/Stove Policy
Toilet Types
Shower Types
Operating Hours & Seasons
Description
Closures & Seasonal Exceptions
Weather
Fees
Contact Information & Directions
Email Address
Phone number (Voice)
Mailing Address
Physical Address
Directions
Additional Information & Regulations
Additional Information
Cell Phone Additional Information
Internet Additional Information
Regulations
Reservations
Image Gallery
Accessibility Information



Juniper Campground Quick Links
Campground RegulationsReserve the Juniper Campground Group Site
Group site reservations open each year on March 1 at 8:00 am MST.

Campsite Lengths
Maximum vehicle length among **pull-through** sites varies. Many sites are quite large (over 50 ft). Usually, with this campground's low occupancy rate, campers are able to find a campsite to accomodate the length of their vehicle. **Back-in sites** accomodate vehicles up to about 20 feet in length.
Parking spots for **walk-to sites** can only accomodate passenger vehicles (no RVs or trailers).
 Last updated: June 18, 2022
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: PO Box 7
Medora,
ND
58645
 Phone: 701 623-4466 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00270

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

00270\00270_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00270\00270_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00270\00270_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00270\00270_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00270\00270_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00270\00270_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00270\Certification Statement Plant ID_00270.pdf Plant certification statement

00270\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION\00270_Polk MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00270\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION\00270_Polk Water Mass Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00270\00270_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00270\00270_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**LEV
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joshua
      D. Schein, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
      that:





(1)
          The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.


Date:March30, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Joshua D. Schein, Ph.D.Joshua
                D. Schein, Ph.D.Chief
                Executive Officer




*This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
      date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
      retained by Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
#### Frank F. Kellogg, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Chicago, Defendant in Error.

Gen. No. 16,661.

Munich?An *courts—when statement of facts is insufficient.*A purported statement of facts by a judge of the Municipal Court of Chicago that is merely a statement that a witness gave testimony in relation to certain things is not sufficient.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1910.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed December 30, 1912.

Harry Brown and George Emmicke, for plaintiff in error; Lemuel M. Ackley, of counsel.

George A. Mason and Edgar H. Hart, for defendant in error; Edward J. Brundage, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error began a case of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago against the defendant in error to recover the sum of $64.84 and interest thereon claimed to be due him as rebate on a special assessment. The cause was submitted to the court without a jury. The court found for the defendant and entered judgment thereon, and the plaintiff sued out this writ of error.

There is in the record neither a correct stenographic report of the proceedings at the trial nor a correct statement of facts by the trial judge, as required by *137the Municipal Court Act. What purports to he a correct statement of facts is manifestly not a statement of the facts by the judge as required by the law, but merely a statement that a witness gave testimony in relation to certain things.

The record disclosing no reversible error, the judg- • ment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
### §2624. Valuation

#### (a) General rule

Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, property shall be valued as of the time of the generation-skipping transfer.

#### (b) Alternate valuation and special use valuation elections apply to certain direct skips

In the case of any direct skip of property which is included in the transferor's gross estate, the value of such property for purposes of this chapter shall be the same as its value for purposes of chapter 11 (determined with regard to sections 2032 and 2032A).

#### (c) Alternate valuation election permitted in the case of taxable terminations occurring at death

If 1 or more taxable terminations with respect to the same trust occur at the same time as and as a result of the death of an individual, an election may be made to value all of the property included in such terminations in accordance with section 2032.

#### (d) Reduction for consideration provided by transferee

For purposes of this chapter, the value of the property transferred shall be reduced by the amount of any consideration provided by the transferee.

(Added Pub. L. 99–514, title XIV, §1431(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2721.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to generation-skipping transfers (within the meaning of section 2611 of this title) made after Oct. 22, 1986, except as otherwise provided, see section 1433 of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
§ 102.26 Responses to requests for access to records. ( a ) *Acknowledgements of requests.* On receipt of a request, an office shall send an acknowledgement letter to the requester.
( b ) *Grants of requests for access.* Once an office makes a determination to grant a request for access in whole or in part, it shall notify the requester in writing. The Program/Support Office Head or designee shall inform the requester in the notice of any fee charged under § 102.31 and shall disclose records to the requester promptly on payment of any applicable fee. If a request is made in person, the office may disclose records to the requester directly, in a manner not unreasonably disruptive of its operations, on payment of any applicable fee and with a written record made of the grant of the request. If a requester is accompanied by another person, he or she shall be required to authorize in writing any discussion of the records in the presence of the other person.
( c ) *Adverse determinations of requests for access.* A Program/Support Office Head or designee making an adverse determination denying a request for access in any respect shall notify the requester of that determination in writing. Adverse determinations, or denials of requests, consist of: a determination to withhold any requested record in whole or in part; a determination that a requested record does not exist or cannot be located; a determination that the requested information is not a record subject to the Privacy Act; a determination on any disputed fee matter; and a denial of a request for expedited treatment. The notification letter shall be signed by the Program/Support Office Head or designee, and shall include: ( 1 ) The name and title or position of the person responsible for the denial;
( 2 ) A brief statement of the reason(s) for the denial, including any FOIA or Privacy Act exemption(s) applied in denying the request; and
( 3 ) A statement that the denial may be appealed under § 102.27(a) and a description of the requirements of § 102.27(a).
#### § 9268.5 Wilderness management. [Reserved]
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Deven Ingram, * From the 259th District Court

of Jones County,

Trial Court No. CR-026995.

Vs. No. 11-19-00239-CR * June 17, 2021

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and we render a judgment of acquittal.
### [§§941 to 943. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–357, title I, §101(b)(1), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1423]

Section 941, added Pub. L. 106–519, §3(b), Nov. 15, 2000, 114 Stat. 2424, related to qualifying foreign trade income.

A prior section 941, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 293; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1053(a), title XIX, §1906(b)(1)(A), 90 Stat. 1648, 1834, set forth provisions authorizing special deduction for China Trade Act corporations, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1053(c), (e), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1649, effective with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1977.

Section 942, added Pub. L. 106–519, §3(b), Nov. 15, 2000, 114 Stat. 2426, defined "foreign trading gross receipts" and set forth economic process requirements.

A prior section 942, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 294, disallowed foreign tax credit authorized by section 901 to any corporation organized under the China Trade Act, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1053(c), (e), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1649, effective with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1977.

Section 943, added Pub. L. 106–519, §3(b), Nov. 15, 2000, 114 Stat. 2428; amended Pub. L. 107–147, title IV, §417(14), Mar. 9, 2002, 116 Stat. 56, set forth other definitions and special rules for purposes of this subpart.

A prior section 943, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 294; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1053(b), 90 Stat. 1648, set forth provisions relating to exclusion from gross income of residents of Formosa or Hong Kong of amounts distributed as dividends by China Trade Act corporations, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1053(c), (e), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1649, effective with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1977.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to transactions after Dec. 31, 2004, see section 101(c) of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as an Effective Date of 2004 Amendments note under section 56 of this title.
Exhibit 4.344

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 133872 dated September 08, 2015

 

For Rendering

 

Data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

Promsvyaz-Invest (Zelenaya Tochka Group)

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1124823007847

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

4826082163

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

9, Kommunalnaya sq., Lipetsk, Lipetsk region, 398059

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until September 08, 2020.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated July 21, 2015 No. 469-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 070649
### §6. Seal; authenticated and certified documents; evidence

The Commissioner of Indian Affairs shall cause a seal to be made and provided for the said office, with such device as the President of the United States shall approve, and copies of any public documents, records, books, maps, or papers belonging to or on the files of said office, authenticated by the seal and certified by the Commissioner thereof, or by such officer as may, for the time being, be acting as or for such Commissioner, shall be evidence equally with the originals thereof.

(July 26, 1892, ch. 256, §3, 27 Stat. 273.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Travel the Shaker Historic Trail





Contact Us
  People
 psychometric drawing of ann leeMother Ann Lee Ann Lee, born in Manchester, England, expanded the Shaker religion to the United States in 1774
 yellow clapboard structure with two doorsJoseph Meacham Joseph Meacham was the first American-born Shaker leader. He was responsible for creating the structure and style Shakers are known for
 Shaker painting "Tree of Life" Lucy Wright Lucy Wright was one of the first Shaker leaders born in the United States, and was responsible for spreading the religion across the country
 Last updated: February 21, 2018
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Follow Trenches on the 19th Corps Trails

Cedar Creek & Belle Grove National Historical Park
### §64. Ordinary income defined

For purposes of this subtitle, the term "ordinary income" includes any gain from the sale or exchange of property which is neither a capital asset nor property described in section 1231(b). Any gain from the sale or exchange of property which is treated or considered, under other provisions of this subtitle, as "ordinary income" shall be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of property which is neither a capital asset nor property described in section 1231(b).

(Added Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(10), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1765.)
#### John B. Clement and Another, as Executors, etc., v. Saratoga Holding Company and Others. Empire Trust Company, etc., Charles H. Bunn and William J. Delaney, as Receivers, etc.

Judgment modified by providing that it shall not prejudice the rights of any of the parties to make claim for any surplus moneys which may remain in the hands of the trustee in bankruptcy after all the creditors of the holding company are *928paid, together with the fees and expenses of the trustees and the provisions of the judgment fully performed.
SSUUTTTTEE RR CC OO

YYOOLLOO CC OO

T12N R1E T12N R2E

18

19

13

24

7

17

30

20

25

12 8

29

Tyndall Landing

46.5 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-932A-R-1

Exhibit B

Henle, Thomas N.

725-202-67

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 8, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\henle_thomas_n\henle_thomas_n.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                              112,877
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         6,669
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    384,129
<PP&E>                              939,727
<DEPRECIATION>                      453,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    2,042,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             2,019,666
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             20,498
<OTHER-SE>                         (170,839)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      2,042,784
<SALES>                               9,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      9,296
<CGS>                                 5,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         5,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,476,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   80,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,548,558)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,548,558)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,548,558)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (1.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (1.21)

</TABLE>
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/08 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
§ 46.205 Actions categorically excluded from further NEPA review. Categorical Exclusion means a category or kind of action that has no significant individual or cumulative effect on the quality of the human environment. See 40 CFR 1508.4. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, if an action is covered by a Departmental categorical exclusion, the bureau is not required to prepare an environmental assessment (see subpart D of this part) or an environmental impact statement (see subpart E of this part). If a proposed action does not meet the criteria for any of the listed Departmental categorical exclusions or any of the individual bureau categorical exclusions, then the proposed action must be analyzed in an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.
( b ) The actions listed in section 46.210 are categorically excluded, Department-wide, from preparation of environmental assessments or environmental impact statements.
( c ) The CEQ Regulations at 40 CFR 1508.4 require agency procedures to provide for extraordinary circumstances in which a normally excluded action may have a significant environmental effect and require additional analysis and action. Section 46.215 lists the extraordinary circumstances under which actions otherwise covered by a categorical exclusion require analyses under NEPA. ( 1 ) Any action that is normally categorically excluded must be evaluated to determine whether it meets any of the extraordinary circumstances in section 46.215; if it does, further analysis and environmental documents must be prepared for the action.
( 2 ) Bureaus must work within existing administrative frameworks, including any existing programmatic agreements, when deciding how to apply any of the section 46.215 extraordinary circumstances.
( d ) Congress may establish categorical exclusions by legislation, in which case the terms of the legislation determine how to apply those categorical exclusions.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141981

JESSICA MOYER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141981 COA: 292061 Jackson CC: 07-002182-CZ COMPREHENSIVE REHABILITATION CENTER, INC. and DOES 1-5, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 16, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Anna Hogan, as Administratrix, etc., Plaintiff, v. Red Hook Light and Power Company, Defendant, Impleaded with Frederick H. Schomburg, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.