alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of EvergreenBancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: March 16, 2007
 /s/ Gordon D. BrowningGordon D. BrowningExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 4.1374 Burdens of proof. ( a ) OSM shall have the burden of going forward to present a prima facie case of the validity of the notice of proposed suspension or rescission or the notice of suspension or rescission.
( b ) The permittee shall have the ultimate burden of persuasion by a preponderance of the evidence that the notice is invalid.
[59 FR 54326, Oct. 28, 1994, as amended at 67 FR 61512, Oct. 1, 2002]
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02089A3

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

EDWARD QUIDERA, JEREMY CAVOLO, 

and RICKY SKELTON, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BLACKSTONE LABS, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 9:20-cv-80898-RAR

NOTICE OF RELATED CASE PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL CIVIL RULE 3.8 AND IOP § 2.15.00

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 3.8 and Section 2.15.00 of the Court’s Internal Operating 

Procedures (“IOP”), Plaintiffs hereby provide notice to the Court of a related action currently 

pending in this District. In U.S. v. Braun, No. 19-80030-CR, Defendant Blackstone Labs, LLC 

(“Defendant”) was named as a defendant in a criminal action pending before Judge Dimitrouleas

(the “Criminal Action”). Like this civil action, the Indictment in the Criminal Action charges 

that Defendant conspired to commit fraud by, among other things, knowingly marketing and 

selling illegal substances as “dietary supplements.” The Indictment is cited in Plaintiffs’

Complaint in paragraph 29 and attached thereto as Exhibit C. 

Local Civil Rule 3.8 and IOP 2.15.00 require the attorneys of record in every action to 

bring to the attention of the Court and opposing counsel the existence of any other action which 

“involves subject matter which is a material part of the subject matter of another action or 

proceeding then pending before this Court” and “the disposition thereof would appear to entail 

the unnecessary duplication of judicial labor if heard by a different Judge.” IOP 2.15.00. That is 

Case 9:20-cv-80898-WPD Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

the case here. Plaintiffs anticipate that there will be significant overlap in questions of fact and 

law between this case and the Criminal Action. Although the criminal case deals with different 

supplements sold by Defendant, Plaintiffs allege that the supplements at issue in this case are 

illegal for the same legal reasons charged by the Criminal Action. Moreover, Plaintiffs expect 

factual overlap between the cases, particularly with regard to evidence needed to prove scienter 

in Defendant’s sales of the supplements in support of Plaintiffs’ fraud claim. 

Plaintiffs will supply opposing counsel with a copy this notice as soon as they are in 

contact with Plaintiffs’ counsel or appear in this action, in accordance with Local Civil Rule 3.8.

Dated: June 10, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

By: /s/ Sarah N. Westcot

Sarah N. Westcot

Scott A. Bursor 

Sarah N. Westcot

701 Brickell Ave., Ste. 1420

Miami, FL 33131

Telephone: (305) 330-5512

Facsimile: (212) 989-9163

Email: scott@bursor.com

swestcot@bursor.com

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

Yitzchak Kopel (pro hac forthcoming)

888 7th Avenue

New York, NY 10019

Telephone: (646) 837-7126

Facsimile: (212) 989-9163

Email: ykopel@bursor.com

 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 9:20-cv-80898-WPD Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 2 of 2
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Arches, Buttes & Rock Formations
#### § 4.806 Designation.

Hearings shall be held before an administrative law judge designated by the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
U.S.Department of

Transportation Office of the Secretary OfTransportation

March 7, 2014 1200 New Jersey Ave
..S.E. Washington, DC 20590

Mr. Joaquin 

### 1.Flores President and General Manager Aviation Services, Ltd. d/b/a Freedom Air P.O. Box 1578 Hagatha, Guam 96932 Re: Dockets DOT-OST-2010-0153 and DOT-OST-2010-0190 Applications ofAviation Services, Ltd. d/b/a Freedom Air forInterstate and Foreign Charter Passenger Certificate Authority DearMr. Flores: This letter isinreference tothe aforementioned applications filed inthe docket onJune 14,2010, onbehalf ofAviation Services, Ltd. d/b/a Freedom Air ("Freedom Air") for certificate authority to conduct interstate and foreign charter passenger operations. Nearly four years have elapsed since the initial filing of these applications, and ithas been more than two years since Freedom Airhas filed fitness information inthe docket in connection with these applications. When an application for authority is submitted to the Department, the applicant is expected tobe fully prepared to prosecute the application in a timely manner. Considering the significant amount of time that has passed since Freedom Air has acted on its pending applications, it appears that Freedom Air no longer intends toprosecute such applications. IfFreedom Air still desires the authority requested in these applications, we direct the company to submit updated fitness information in accordance with 14 CFR Part 204 within 14 days from the date of this letter inthe dockets identified above. IfFreedom Air fails to submit such information that will enable us to satisfactorily conclude its fitness to conduct its proposed operations, we intend to dismiss the applications for failure toprosecute.2

Ifyou have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Vanessa Balgobin ofmy staff at (202) 366-972 I. Sincerely.

Laur ly J. Remo Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division
cc: Dockets DOT-OST-2010-0l53 and DOT-OST-201O-0l90

.Mr. Richard P. Guillory Honolulu Certificate Management Office. Federal Aviation Administration
#### § 3743.1 Hearing procedures.

The procedures with respect to notice of such hearing and the conduct thereof, and in respect to appeals, shall follow the provisions of Appeals and Contests of the Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Land Management (part 1850 of this chapter) relating to contests or protests affecting public lands of the United States.
#### § 4.1115 Waiver of right to hearing.

Any person entitled to a hearing before an administrative law judge under the act may waive such right in writing. Where parties are directed by any rule in these regulations to file a responsive pleading on or before a specified time, any party who fails to file such responsive pleading by the time specified, may be deemed to have waived his right to a hearing. Unless all parties to a proceeding who are entitled to a hearing waive, or are deemed to have waived such right, a hearing will be held.
P.1 

OAR Box 1781 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

132) I V-C-46 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/29/2008 10:46:24 AM Sheet 132 of 142 
P.2 

* 

Dave Svendsgaard 

07/28/2000 03:29 PM 

To: bill.pedersen@shawpittman.com 

cc: Dennis Crumpler/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: Follow-up on PCP Exclusion issues 

AM*0-5 A 

Bill, 

Just wanted to give you my email address. As we discussed after Tuesday's meeting, we certainly want 

to hear about any cases in which BACT-level control has been required for mitigating collateral pollutant 

increases in order to qualify for the PCP Exclusion. 

Dave Svendsgaard 

EPA/OAQPS/ITPID/IIG 

919.541.2380-phone 

919.541.5509-fax 
" Zacaroli, Alec 

99 Zbur, Richard 

100 

Burer.u of National Affairs 

Latha-nS Watkins 

Iron & Steel Institute 

633 W. 5th Street. Los Angeles. CA 90071-2005 

202-452-6364 

213-485-1234 213-891-8763 rlck.zbur@lw.com 

Added to the original invitee list. 

CO
§ 3181.4 Inclusion of non-Federal lands. ( a ) Where State-owned land is to be unitized with Federal lands, approval of the agreement by appropriate State officials must be obtained prior to its submission to the proper BLM office for final approval. When authorized by the laws of the State in which the unitized land is situated, appropriate provision may be made in the agreement, recognizing such laws to the extent that they are applicable to non-Federal unitized land.
( b ) When Indian lands are included, modification of the unit agreement will be required where appropriate. Approval of an agreement containing Indian lands by the Bureau of Indian Affairs must be obtained prior to final approval by the authorized officer.
#### Eugene N. Sanctuary, Appellant, v. Dorothy S. Thackrey et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [189 Mise. 724.]
§ 3202.10 Who may hold a geothermal lease? You may hold a geothermal lease if you are: ( a ) A United States citizen who is at least 18 years old;
( b ) An association of United States citizens, including a partnership;
( c ) A corporation organized under the laws of the United States, any state or the District of Columbia; or
( d ) A domestic governmental unit.
#### § 9212.0-3 Authority.

This subpart is issued under the authority of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*).
#### § 420.1 Objectives.

The provisions of this part establish regulations for off-road vehicle use on reclamation lands to protect the land resources, to promote the safety of all users, to minimize conflicts among the various uses, and to ensure that any permitted use will not result in significant adverse environmental impact or cause irreversible damage to existing ecological balances.
§ 3481.1 General obligations of the operator/lessee. ( a ) The operator/lessee shall conduct exploration activities, reclamation, and abandonment of exploration operations for Federal coal pursuant to the performance standards of the rules of this part, applicable requirements of 30 CFR 815.15 (OSM permanent performance standards for coal exploration) or an approved State program, any Federal lease or license terms and/or conditions, the requirements of the approved exploration plan, and orders issued by the authorized officer.
( b ) The operator/lessee shall conduct surface and underground coal mining operations involving development, production, resource recovery and protection, and preparation and handling of coal in accordance with the rules of this part, terms and conditions of the Federal leases or licenses, the approved resource recovery and protection plan, and any orders issued by the authorized officer.
( c ) The operator/lessee shall prevent wasting of coal and other resources during exploration, development, and production and shall adequately protect the recoverable coal reserves and other resources upon abandonment.
( d ) The operator/lessee shall immediately report to the authorized officer any conditions or accidents causing severe injury or loss of life that could affect mining operations conducted under the resource recovery and protection plan or threaten significant loss of recoverable coal reserves or damage to the mine, the lands, or other resources, including, but not limited to, fires, bumps, squeezes, highwall caving, landslides, inundation of mine with water, and gas outbursts, including corrective action initiated or recommended. Within 30 days after such accident, the operator/lessee shall submit a detailed report of damage caused by such accident and of the corrective action taken.
( e ) The principal point of contact for the operator/lessee with respect to any requirement of the rules of this part shall be the authorized officer. All reports, plans, or other information required by the rules of this part shall be submitted to the authorized officer.
( f ) The operator/lessee shall provide the authorized officer free access to the Federal premises.
[47 FR 33179, July 30, 1982. Redesignated and amended at 48 FR 41589, 41590, Sept. 16, 1983]
#### Sussman Goldreyer v. Morris Shalita.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### DE BORD, Respondent, v, BRANDT, Appellant.

(206 N. W. 925.)

(File No. 5567.

Opinion filed January 9, 1926.)

Appeal and Error — Appealable Orders — Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Action as to Certain Defendant Because of Immunity from Sendee of Process Is Not Appealable.

Under Rev. Code 1919, Sec. 3168, specifying orders which are reviewable, order denying motion to dismiss action as to defendant on ground that he was immune from service of process is not appealable.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hyde County; Hon. J. H. Bot-tum, Judge.

Action by Reuben De Bord- against Henry Brandt and another, copartners under the firm name of Brandt & Goehring. *174From an order denying a motion to dismiss the action as to defendant Brandt, he appeals.

Note.- — -Reported in 206 N. W. 925. See, Headnote, American Key-Numbered Digest, Appeal and error, Key-No. 105, 3 C. J. Sec. 335.

Appeal dismissed.

*C. B. Noel,*of Highmore, for Appellant.

*M. C. Cunningham-,*of Highmore, for Respondent.

DILLON, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss the action as to- defendant Brandt. The ground of the motion was that he was immune from service of process. The appeal is dismissed because the order is not appealable. Ryan v. Davenport, 3 S. D. 203, 58 N. W. 568; Rev. Code 1919, § 3168.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22793]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employee Benefits Security Administration


Working Group on Health and Welfare Form 5500 Requirements, 
Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public teleconference meeting will be held on Friday, October 29, 2004, 
of the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans 
Working Group assigned to study health and welfare Form 5500 
requirements.
    The session will take place in Room S4215-C, U.S. Department of 
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. The purpose 
of the open meeting, which will run from 1 p.m. to approximately 4 
p.m., is for Working Group members to discuss and conclude their 
report/recommendations for the Secretary of Labor.
    Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written 
statement pertaining to the topic may do so by submitting 20 copies to 
Larry Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. 
Department of Labor, Room N-5656, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210. Statements received on or before October 20, 2004 
will be included in the record of the meeting. Individuals or 
representatives of organizations wishing to address the Working Group 
should forward their request to the Executive Secretary at the above 
address or via telephone at (202) 693-8668. Oral presentations will be 
limited to 20 minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for 
the record. Individuals with disabilities who need special 
accommodations should contact Larry Good by October 20 at the address 
indicated in this notice.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 5th day of October, 2004
Ann L. Combs,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-22793 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
454 P.2d 973

#### STATE of New Mexico, ex rel., Ricky DIMAS, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Richard A. STANLEY, Juvenile and District Judge of the District Court of Otero County, Third Judicial District, State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 8858.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

June 5, 1969.

NOBLE, Chief Justice, and MOISE, TACKETT and WATSON, Justices, concurring; COMPTON, Justice, being absent and not participating;

Ordered that petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.
§ 3595.1 Surface openings. ( a ) The operator/lessee shall substantially fill in, fence, protect or close all surface openings, subsidence holes, surface excavations or workings which are a hazard to people or animals. Such protective measures shall be maintained in a secure condition during the term of the lease, license or permit. Before abandonment of operations, all openings, including water discharge points, shall be closed to the satisfaction of the authorized officer.
( b ) Reclamation or protection of surface areas no longer needed for operations will commence without delay. The authorized officer shall designate such areas where restoration or protective measures, or both shall be taken.
( c ) Wells utilized for operations involving solution mining or brine extraction shall be abandoned in accordance with the approved mine plan.
| Exhibit 10.14 |
|---------------|

Schedule of Auction-Rate Securities Held

| **Name**                  |               | **Cusip** |               | **Notional Amount** |
|---------------------------|--------------------|-----------|--------------------|---------------------|
|                           |     |           |     |                     |
| College Loan Corp         |               | 194262DE8 |               | 5,000,000           |
| Ed Funding of South       |               | 28148NBM4 |               | 4,950,000           |
| Education Loan Inc.       |               | 280907AW6 |               | 4,150,000           |
| GCO Ed Loan Funding       |               | 36156HAL2 |               | 5,000,000           |
| GCO Ed Loan Funding       |               | 36156HAG3 |               | 5,000,000           |
| Nelnet Education Loan     |               | 64031RAK5 |               | 5,000,000           |
| Nelnet Education Loan     |               | 64031RAF6 |               | 5,000,000           |
| Northstar Education  |               | 66704JBW7 |               | 1,075,000           |
| Oklahoma Stud Loan        |               | 679110CN4 |               | 5,000,000           |
| Oklahoma Student Loan     |               | 679110CN4 |               | 5,000,000           |
| Penn St Higher Ed         |               | 709163EH8 |               | 5,000,000           |
| SLM Stud Loan Trust       |               | 78442GJC1 |               | 3,000,000           |

----
**Certification   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States  Code)**

  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Statoil ASA, a company incorporated under the laws of Norway (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2014 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date:              | 19 March 2015                                        |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| By:                | /s/ Torgrim Reitan                                   |
| Name:              | Torgrim Reitan                                       |
| Title:   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Jessie C. Whitney, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Emma F Brenack and Another, Appellants, and Another, Defendant.

Motion granted, default opened, and defendants permitted to file a brief herein within ten days, on condition, however, that within five days they pay to the respondent the sum of $159.03 costs as taxed; otherwise, motion denied, with $10 costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8