alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Department of the Interior 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 

Interior Region 10 

2800 Cottage Way 

Sacramento, California 95825-1898 

IN REPLY REFER TO: 

CGB-3400 

2.2.4.22 

Contractor 

Address Line 1 

Address Line 2 

Subject: Conversion from a Water Service Contract to a Repayment Contract as Authorized 

Under the Water Infrastructure Improvement for the Nation (WIIN) Act for 

Contract XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX-XXXX 

Dear Contractor: 

The Bureau of Reclamation has received Contractor’s notification of interest to convert from a 

water service contract, to a repayment contract as outlined in the WIIN Act, Public Law 114-322, 

Section 4011. Under this section of the WIIN Act, Reclamation is required to provide an 

estimate of the Central Valley Project construction costs allocated to the contractor. The law 

provides for two choices of repayment. The contractor could choose to pay in a lump sum 

payment, or to pay within 3 years of the effective date of the repayment contract. 

Your water service contract with Reclamation currently has estimated unpaid costs for 

construction as outlined in the enclosed schedules. The costs take into account water service 

construction costs currently being allocated to Contractor, that are unpaid as of September 30, 

2018. 

Please note, the attached amounts are only estimated unpaid construction costs as they are 

required to be provided to you within 90 days of your request. Unpaid construction amounts 

identified for irrigation are discounted as required by the legislation based on 1⁄2 of the 20-year 

Treasury rate. 

Also note there are other cost recovery and cost allocation provisions that are identified in the 

WIIN Act, Section 4011. I recommend that Contractor representatives review the provisions 

included in the legislation, so there is a good understanding of requirements of the law. The cost 

recovery process can also be discussed further with Reclamation Finance Staff. Other questions 

can be discussed with your Reclamation Contract Representative. 

INTERIOR REGION 10 • CALIFORNIA-GREAT BASIN 

CALIFORNIA*, NEVADA*, OREGON* * PARTIAL 
If you have cost recovery questions, you may contact Jesus Reynoso at jreynoso@usbr.gov or by 

phone (916) 978-5362. If you have contract related questions, you may contact Barbara 

Hidleburg at bhidleburg@usbr.gov or by phone (916) 978-5193. 

Sincerely, 

Ann Lubas-Williams 

Regional Financial Manager 

Enclosure/s 

INTERIOR REGION 10 • CALIFORNIA-GREAT BASIN 

CALIFORNIA*, NEVADA*, OREGON* * PARTIAL
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1665

ELSIE B. CHURCH, widow of Sylvester Clark

Church,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondent.

On Petition For Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(98-0046-BLA)

Submitted: July 20, 2000 Decided: August 3, 2000

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elsie B. Church, Petitioner Pro Se. Christian P. Barber, Jennifer

U. Toth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Elsie B. Church, widow of Sylvester Clark Church, seeks review

of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the

administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant

to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). Our review of

the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Church v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, BRB No. 99-601-BLA (B.R.B.

Feb. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Gerald W. Ford, Doing Business under the Name of G. W. Ford Yacht Agency, Appellant, v. Hiram E. Manville, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The plaintiff’s proof wholly failed to establish that he was the procuring cause of the sale of defendant’s yacht. His employment was not exclusive and it appears without substantial contradiction that others, acting for the defendant, actually interested the purchaser and conducted all the negotiations which resulted in the sale. The plaintiff was a complete stranger to these negotiations and had no part in ultimately bringing about the sale. The court should have directed a verdict for the defendant. We are not unmindful of the criticism of the remarks of the Trial Judge and the alleged errors in the charge. We consider, however, that since there was no substantial evidence in support of plaintiff’s claim, these matters should be disregarded and the judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
§ 431.7 Administration and management of the Colorado River Dam Fund. Reclamation is responsible for the repayment of the Project and the administration of the Colorado River Dam Fund and the Lower Colorado River Basin Development Fund. ( a ) All receipts to the Project shall be deposited in the Fund along with electric service revenues deposited by Western and shall be available without further appropriation for: ( 1 ) Defraying the costs of operation (including purchase of supplemental energy to meet temporary deficiencies in firm energy which the Secretary of Energy is obligated by contract to supply), maintenance, and replacements of all Project facilities, including emergency replacements necessary to insure continuous operations;
( 2 ) Payment of annual interest on the unpaid investments in accordance with appropriate statutory authorities;
( 3 ) Repayment of capital investments including amounts readvanced from the Treasury;
( 4 ) Payments to the States of Arizona and Nevada as provided in section 2(c) of the Adjustment Act and section 403(c)(2) of the Colorado River Basin Project Act;
( 5 ) Transfers to the Lower Colorado River Basin Development Fund and subsequent transfers to the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund, as provided in section 403(c)(2) of the Colorado River Basin Project Act and section 102(c) of the Hoover Power Plant Act, as reimbursement for the monies expended heretofore from the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund to meet deficiencies in generation at Hoover Dam during the filling period of storage units of the Colorado River Storage Project in accordance with the provisions of sections 403(g) and 502 of the Colorado River Basin Project Act, such transfers, totalling $27,591,621.25, to be effected by 17 annual payments of $1,532,868.00 beginning in 1988 and a final payment of $1,532,865.25 in 2005; and
( 6 ) Any other purposes authorized by existing and future Federal law.
( b ) Appropriations for the visitor facilities program and any other purposes authorized by existing and future Federal law advanced or readvanced to the Fund shall be disbursed from the Fund for those purposes.
( c ) All funds advanced by non-Federal Contractors for the Uprating Program shall be deposited in the Fund, shall be available without further appropriation, and shall be disbursed from the Fund to accomplish the Uprating Program.
( d ) The Fund shall be administered and managed in accordance with applicable Federal laws and regulations, by the Secretary acting through the Commissioner.
[51 FR 23962, July 1, 1986; 51 FR 24531, July 7, 1986]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gary M. Beasley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of ZipRealty, Inc. on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of ZipRealty, Inc. Date:
March 28, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Gary M. BeasleyGary M. BeasleyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by
ZipRealty, Inc. and will be retained by ZipRealty, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### James Robinson, Respondent, v. Alberger Pump and Condenser Company, Appellant.

Judgement and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Spill Response
Regular Totals (Holders)

Airport = JFK

Season = S

Holder = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 07/01/2012 (History & Current)

02/23/2015 09:57:10

Query Parameters:
02/23/2015 09:57:10

Carrier

Regular Totals (Holders)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2012 (History & Current)

JFK

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 183 

AAR ASIANA AIRLINES 2 

ACA AIR CANADA 2 

AEA AIR EUROPA 2 

AEW AEROSVIT AIRLINES 2 

AFL AEROFLOT 4 

AFR AIR FRANCE 10 

AIC AIR INDIA 6 

AJM AIR JAMAICA 1 

AMX AEROMEXICO 9 

ANA ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS 2 

AUA AUSTRIAN 2 

AVA AVIANCA 4 

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4 

AZA ALITALIA 6 

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 20 

BER AIR BERLIN 2 

BWA CARIBBEAN AIRLINES 8 

CCA AIR CHINA 2 

CES CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES 2 

CMP COPA AIRLINES 3 

CPA CATHAY PACIFIC 7 

CSA CZECH AIRLINES 2 

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 400 

DAT BRUSSELS AIRLINES 1 

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 8 

EIA EVERGREEN 1 

EIN AER LINGUS 6 

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 5 

ETD ETIHAD 2 

EVA EVA AIRLINES 1 

FDX FED EX 3 

FIN FINNAIR 2 

HAL HAWAIIAN AIR 2 

IBE IBERIA AIRWAYS 4 

ICE ICELANDAIR 4 

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2 

JAL JAPAN AIR LINES 3 

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 348 

KAC KUWAIT AIRWAYS 1 

KAL KOREAN AIR 3 

KLM KLM ROYAL DUTCH 4 

LAN LAN AIRLINES 3 

LNE LAN ECUADOR 1 

LPE LAN PERU 1 

MSR EGYPT AIR 2 

QFA QANTAS AIRLINES 2 

QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 2 

RAM ROYAL AIR MAROC 2 

RJA ROYAL JORDANIAN 2 

SAA SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS 2 

Page 2
02/23/2015 09:57:10

Carrier

Regular Totals (Holders)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2012 (History & Current)

JFK

SCX SUN COUNTRY AIRLINES, INC. 4 

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2 

SVA SAUDI ARABIAN AIRLINES 2 

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 6 

TAI TACA AIRLINES 2 

TAM TAM BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 6 

THY TURKISH AIRLINES, INC. 6 

TSO TRANSAERO AIRLINES 2 

UAE EMIRATES 4 

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 45 

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1 

USA US AIRWAYS 16 

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 6 

VRD VIRGIN AMERICA 20 

Page 3
#### § 418.29 Project management.

In addition to the provisions of § 418.28, if the District is found to be operating Project facilities or any part thereof in substantial violation of this part, then, upon the determination by the Bureau, the Bureau may take over from the District the care, operation, maintenance, and management of the diversion and outlet works (Derby Dam and Lahontan Dam/Reservoir) or any or all of the transferred works by giving written notice to the District of the determination and its effective date. Following written notification from the Bureau, the care, operation, and maintenance of the works may be retransferred to the District.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from  Noram  Gaming and  Entertainment,  Inc.  and  Subsidiary
                  September 30, 2000  financial  statements  and is qualified in
                  its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                          0000894555
<NAME>                         Noram Gaming and Entertainment, Inc.
<CURRENCY>                     US


<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.00

<CASH>                                               480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        3,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          176,341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     180,707
<PP&E>                                               87,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                       79,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       188,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                602,287
<BONDS>                                              48,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             20,138
<OTHER-SE>                                           (481,959)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         188,853
<SALES>                                              13,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     13,606
<CGS>                                                7,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        7,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     128,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   10,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (122,855)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (122,855)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (122,855)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.01



</TABLE>
### [§§418 to 418D. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–235, div. O, title I, §108(b)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2787]

Section 418, added Pub. L. 96–364, title II, §202(a), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1271, related to reorganization status.

Section 418A, added Pub. L. 96–364, title II, §202(a), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1274, related to notice of reorganization and funding requirements.

Section 418B, added Pub. L. 96–364, title II, §202(a), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1274, related to minimum contribution requirement.

Section 418C, added Pub. L. 96–364, title II, §202(a), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1278, related to overburden credit against minimum contribution requirement.

Section 418D, added Pub. L. 96–364, title II, §202(a), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1280, related to adjustments in accrued benefits.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 113–235, div. O, title I, §108(c), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2789, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending sections 418E and 431 of this title and sections 1084, 1301, and 1426 of Title 29, Labor, and repealing sections 418 to 418D of this title and sections 1421 to 1425 of Title 29] shall apply with respect to plan years beginning after December 31, 2014."
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T22:15:25-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6550

NATHANIEL JOHN LITTLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District

Judge. (CR-97-41, CA-01-84)

Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 1, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel John Little, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel John Little seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Little v. United States, Nos. CR-97-41; CA-01-

84 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 30, 2002 & entered Jan. 31, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael J. Tomczak, Chief Financial Officer of Integrated Surgical Systems,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
          June 30, 2009, which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic
          Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


 Dated: August 12, 2009                             /s/ Michael J. Tomczak
                                                    ------------------------
                                                        Michael J. Tomczak
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4933 

To take certain land in the State of Washington into trust for the benefit 

of the Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 

Ms. CANTWELL (for herself and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To take certain land in the State of Washington into trust 

for the benefit of the Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup 

Reservation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Puyallup Tribe of Indi5 ans Land Into Trust Confirmation Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LAND TO BE TAKEN INTO TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT 

7 OF THE PUYALLUP TRIBE OF THE PUYALLUP 

8 RESERVATION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The approximately 17.264 acres 

10 of land owned in fee by the Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4933 IS

1 Reservation in Pierce County, Washington, and described 

2 in subsection (b) is hereby taken into trust by the United 

3 States for the benefit of the Puyallup Tribe of the Puy4 allup Reservation. 

5 (b) LAND DESCRIPTIONS.— 

6 (1) PARCEL 1.—Lots 1 to 4, inclusive, Block 

7 85, Map of Tacoma Tidelands, as surveyed and plat8 ted by the Board of Appraisers of Tide and Shore 

9 Lands for Pierce County, according to Plat filed for 

10 record on September 14, 1895, in the Office of the 

11 County Auditor, in Tacoma, Pierce County, Wash12 ington. 

13 (2) PARCEL 2.—Lots 5 to 9, inclusive, Block 

14 85, Map of Tacoma Tidelands, as surveyed and plat15 ted by the Board of Appraisers of Tide and Shore 

16 Lands for Pierce County, according to Plat filed for 

17 record on September 14, 1895, in the Office of the 

18 County Auditor, in Tacoma, Pierce County, Wash19 ington. 

20 (3) PARCEL 3.—Parcel A of City of Tacoma 

21 Boundary Line Adjustment MPD2011– 

22 40000166230, recorded October 12, 2011, under 

23 Pierce County Auditor Recording No. 

24 201110125009, as corrected by Affidavit of Minor 

25 Correction of Map Recorded September 25, 2012, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4933 IS

1 under Pierce County Auditor Recording No. 

2 201209250440. 

3 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—Land taken into trust under 

4 subsection (a) shall be— 

5 (1) part of the reservation of the Puyallup 

6 Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation; and 

7 (2) administered in accordance with the laws 

8 and regulations generally applicable to property held 

9 in trust by the United States for the benefit of an 

10 Indian Tribe. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**








Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of M45 Mining Resources
      Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrea
      M. Cortellazzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the
              Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects,
              the
                financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date: August 20, 2007
            
            
            /s/
              Andrea M.
              CortellazziAndrea
              M. CortellazziChief
              Executive
              Officer
#### § 112.6 Discrimination in accommodations or services.

Small business concerns which apply for or receive any financial assistance of the kind described in § 112.2(a)(1), concerns which are identifiable beneficiaries of loans made under § 112.2(a)(2), and physicians, hospitals, schools, libraries, and other individuals or organizations which apply for or receive financial assistance of the kind described in § 112.2(a)(5), may not discriminate in the treatment accommodations or services they provide to their patients, students, visitors, guests, members, passengers, or patrons in the conduct of such businesses or other enterprises, whether or not operated for profit.

[31 FR 2374, Feb. 4, 1966]
### **Subchapter V—Title 11 Cases**

Sec.
1398.
Rules relating to individuals' title 11 cases.
1399.
No separate taxable entities for partnerships, corporations, etc.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–589, §3(a)(1), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3397, added subchapter V heading "Title 11 Cases" and items 1398 and 1399.