UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-60622-RUIZ/STRAUSS 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

1010 NORTH 30TH ROAD, 

HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33021, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL

THIS MATTERcame before the Court upon the United States’ Motion to Compel Special 

Interrogatories (“Motion”) [DE 32], filed on June 28, 2020. Initially, in accordance with the 

Paperless Order Setting Discovery Procedures [DE 18], Plaintiff’s counsel requested a discovery 

hearing. Consequently, the Court scheduled a discovery hearing, which was held on June 24, 2020 

[see DE 20, 23, 29]. In advance of the discovery hearing, the parties submitted a Joint Discovery 

Status Report [DE 24] regarding the issues to be considered. Following the June 24, 2020 hearing, 

the Court entered the Order Setting Briefing Schedule on Discovery Dispute [DE 30]. The Motion 

is now ripe in light of the filing of Claimants’ Response [DE 33]. The Court has reviewed the 

Motion, the Response, the Joint Discovery Status Report, and the record in this case.

This asset forfeiture action is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 983 and the Supplemental Rules for 

Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions (“Supplemental Rule(s)”). See United 

States v. $12,126.00 in U.S. Currency, 337 F. App’x 818, 819 (11th Cir. 2009) (citations omitted); 

Supp. R. G(1). Supplemental Rule G(6)(a) permits “[t]he government [to] serve special 

interrogatories limited to the claimant’s identity and relationship to the defendant property without 

the court’s leave at any time after the claim is filed and before discovery is closed.” While Rule

Case 0:20-cv-60622-RAR Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2020 Page 1 of 5
2 

G(6) expressly limits the scope of special interrogatories, courts are nevertheless guided by the 

concept of proportionality. See United States v. One Hundred & Sixty Four Thousand Four 

Hundred & Sixty Five Dollars in United States Currency ($164,465.00), No. 16-CV-80339, 2016 

WL 11201757, at *3 (S.D. Fla. June 21, 2016). 

As set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule G, the purpose of such special 

interrogatories is to gather information concerning a putative claimant’s standing. See Supp. R. G

advisory committee’s note (“It remains useful, however, to permit the government to file limited 

interrogatories at any time after a claim is filed to gather information that bears on the claimant’s 

standing.”). See also United States v. $22,900.00 in U.S. Currency, No. 8:14-CV-467-T-30MAP, 

2014 WL 2574052, at *1 (M.D. Fla. June 9, 2014) (“The purpose of the rule is to permit the 

government to file limited interrogatories at any time after the claim is filed to gather information 

that bears on the claimant’s standing.” (citing United States v. $133,420.00 in U.S. Currency, 672 

F.3d 629, 635 (9th Cir. 2012))). Nevertheless, the language of the rule itself is not confined to the 

issue of standing; instead, it only limits the scope of special interrogatories to a “claimant’s identity 

and relationship to the defendant property.” Moreover, at this early stage, the issue of standing is 

not yet squarely before the Court. 

Plaintiff seeks to compel answers/better answers to eight (8) special interrogatories that it 

served on Claimants, who are individuals that have legal title to the Defendant properties. 

Interrogatory numbers 3(a)-(d)1 are within the scope of Rule G(6)(a) because they pertain to 

 

1 Interrogatory number 3 provides as follows: Describe in detail the circumstances in which you acquired 

your ownership interest in [the property] including but not limited to, the following: (a) the date, time, and 

place in which you acquired the property; (b) all consideration, including monetary and non-monetary, you 

paid in exchange for the property; (c) the reason you acquired the property; (d) the identity of the person(s) 

from whom you acquired the property; and (e) the identity of the person(s) who were present when you 

obtained the property. For each person identified in the answer to this special interrogatory, provide the 

person’s name, address, and telephone number.

Case 0:20-cv-60622-RAR Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2020 Page 2 of 5
3 

Claimants’ relationships to the Defendant properties. Interrogatory number 42 does as well. 

Interrogatory numbers 3(a)-(d) and 4 are also proportional to the needs of the case. Therefore, the 

Court will compel answers to those interrogatories. 

However, interrogatory number 5,3 though within the scope of Rule G(6)(a), is overbroad 

and not proportional to the needs of the case as drafted. Therefore, the Court will require Claimants 

to answer a narrower version of interrogatory number 5. Specifically, Claimants should answer 

who has paid maintenance expenses for the Defendant properties since Claimants acquired title to 

the properties. To the extent Claimants paid such expenses, they should disclose the source(s) of 

the funds used to make payment. Claimants do not need to identify every specific payment or the 

dates on which payments were made. 

As to the remaining interrogatories, the Court will not compel Claimants to provide 

answers. Interrogatory numbers 1,4 2,5 and 3(e) simply do not concern Claimants’ identities or 

 

2 Interrogatory number 4 provides as follows: Please state whether you obtained any financing (including, 

but not limited to, a mortgage or an unrecorded loan) in order to acquire your ownership interest in [the 

property]. If so, please provide all details regarding the financing, including, but not limited to, (a) the name 

and address of all persons or entities from whom you obtained financing; (b) whether there are any 

documents memorializing the financing; (c) the amount of any initial loan; (d) the terms of any repayment 

agreements; and (e) the outstanding principal and interest currently owed.

3 Interrogatory number 5 provides as follows: Explain how and when maintenance expenses for [the 

property] including, but not limited to, utilities, cable, internet, homeowner or condominium association or 

maintenance fees, property taxes, and insurance policies have been paid since you acquired an ownership 

interest in [the property].

4 Interrogatory number 1 provides as follows: List the names, business addresses, dates of employment, and 

rates of pay regarding all employers, including self-employment, for whom you have worked for the past 

10 (ten) years. For each response, include whether payment was made to you by check, cash, direct deposit, 

through a third-party application such as PayPal or Venmo, and/or through any other means. Your answer 

should set forth the name, address, and telephone number of each business; state your interest/relationship 

in each business (e.g., sole proprietorship, partnership, employee, etc.); the name of partner or supervisor 

of each business; the inclusive dates of employment; the job description and position/title at each business; 

the reasons for leaving the employment; and the amount of gross and net monthly salary for each business.

5 Interrogatory number 2 provides as follows: Please state how much income you reported to the Internal 

Revenue Service each of the past 10 (ten) tax years.

Case 0:20-cv-60622-RAR Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2020 Page 3 of 5
4 

their relationships to the Defendant properties, especially considering that the Defendant properties 

are real property. Likewise, interrogatory number 66 does not specifically seek information 

concerning Claimants’ identities or their relationships to the Defendant properties. 

With respect to interrogatory number 7,7 it purports to seek information regarding funds 

used to purchase and/or maintain the Defendant properties, but it is evident that interrogatory 

number 7 represents an effort primarily geared towards discovering information related to financial 

accounts, and not information regarding Claimants’ identities or relationships to the Defendant 

properties. Interrogatory number 7 is almost entirely outside the scope of Rule G(6)(a), and it is 

not proportional to the needs of the case (at least at this early stage). The only part of interrogatory 

number 7 that arguably comes within the scope of Rule G(6)(a) is 7(g), but 7(g) is disproportiona l. 

Moreover, the proportional (and permissible) aspects of 7(g) are subsumed in the narrowed version 

of interrogatory number 5, which the Court is requiring Claimants to answer.

Finally, interrogatory number 88 is a vague, overbroad, and disproportional catch-all

interrogatory. Essentially, it asks Claimants to provide every possible piece of information that 

 

6 Interrogatory number 6 provides as follows: State with particularity all occupants of [the property] since 

you acquired an ownership interest in the property, including the dates of such occupation, including 

number of overnight stays, if any. For each person identified in your answer to this special interrogatory, 

provide the person’s name, address, and telephone number.

7 Interrogatory number 7 provides as follows:Provide the following information about all financial accounts 

that contained funds used to purchase and/or maintain [the property]:(a) The type of financial account 

(e.g., checking, savings, 401K, etc.); (b) The full account number; (c) The name and address of the 

financial institution; (d) The names and addresses of all individuals who have signature authority for the 

account; (e) The names and address of all individuals who are account holders;(f) The names and addresses 

of all beneficiaries of the account, regardless of whether they have signature authority or are account 

holders; and (g) The dates and amounts of any withdrawal or transfer of funds used for the purchase and/or 

maintenance of the property, as well as the purpose of the withdrawal or transfer (e.g., that the funds were 

used to make the down payment on the property, that the funds were used to pay property taxes on the 

property, that the funds were used to make a payment towards the mortgage on the property, etc.), and the 

names and addresses of the recipient, or intended recipient, for each withdrawal or transfer.

8 Interrogatory number 8 provides as follows: If you have any records, documents, or tangible items that 

document or relate in any way to your responses to the foregoing special interrogatories, or are otherwise 

Case 0:20-cv-60622-RAR Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2020 Page 4 of 5
5

could possibly come within the scope of Rule G(6)(a) whether or not Plaintiff has specifically 

thought to ask for that information. 

For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

1. The Motion [DE 32] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

2. On or before July 20, 2020, Claimants shall serve answers/better answers to 

interrogatory numbers 3(a)-(d) and 4, and to interrogatory number 5 (as narrowed above).

3. The Motion is denied as to interrogatory numbers 1, 2, 3(e), 6, 7, and 8.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 10th day of July 2020.

 

relevant to your interest in the defendant real properties, identify each piece of evidence with specificity, 

including the name, address, and telephone number of its custodian. In lieu thereof, you may produce copies 

of the records, documents, or tangible items.

Case 0:20-cv-60622-RAR Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2020 Page 5 of 5