alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



I, Glen Shipley, certify that :

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Internet Commerce
      Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      a.    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
            to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      b.    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report our report about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
            end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
            and

      c.    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the
            registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
            affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
      on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent functions):

      a.    All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            control over financial report which are reasonably likely to
            adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
            summarize and report financial information; and

      b.    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 15, 2004



By: /s/ Glen Shipley
   ---------------------------------
     Glen Shipley
     Chief Financial Officer
#### § 50.20 How may a request be submitted?

If the Native Hawaiian community seeks to reestablish a formal government-to-government relationship with the United States, the request under this part must be submitted to the Secretary, Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08750

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

08750\08750_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08750\08750_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08750\08750_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 08750\08750_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08750\08750_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08750\08750_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08750\08750_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08750\08750_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

08750\Certification Statement Plant ID_8750.pdf Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Stop by Boston Mill Visitor Center

Cuyahoga Valley National Park
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon RODRIGUEZ-RUIZ, also known as Jose Ramon Rodriguez-Ruiz, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40698.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, HOUSTON, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ramon Rodriguez-Ruiz (Rodriguez) appeals his conviction and sentence following his plea of guilty to illegal reentry after deportation. Rodriguez was sentenced to 46 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Rodriguez asserts that the district court erred in ordering, as a condition of supervised release, that he cooperate with the probation officer in the collection of DNA. His claim is not ripe for judicial review in light of our holding in *United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Rodriguez also asserts that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. Rodriguez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Rodriguez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrale *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*re*213mains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Rodriguez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under tire limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROLAND THOMPSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 458 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInterpretation of plasma diagnostics package results in terms of large space structure plasma interactionsThe Plasma Diagnostics Package (PDP) is a spacecraft which was designed and built at The University of Iowa and which contained several scientific instruments. These instruments were used for measuring Space Shuttle Orbiter environmental parameters and plasma parameters. The PDP flew on two Space Shuttle flights. The first flight of the PDP was on Space Shuttle Mission STS-3 and was a part of the NASA/Office of Space Science payload (OSS-1). The second flight of the PDP was on Space Shuttle Mission STS/51F and was a part of Spacelab 2. The interpretation of both the OSS-1 and Spacelab 2 PDP results in terms of large space structure plasma interactions is emphasized.Document ID19910018647Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKurth, William S.*(Iowa Univ. Iowa City, IA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1991Subject CategoryPlasma PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-188651NAS 1.26:188651Accession Number91N27961Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-449Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910018647.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §6720A. Penalty with respect to certain adulterated fuels

#### (a) In general

Any person who knowingly transfers for resale, sells for resale, or holds out for resale any liquid for use in a diesel-powered highway vehicle or a diesel-powered train which does not meet applicable EPA regulations (as defined in section 45H(c)(3)), shall pay a penalty of $10,000 for each such transfer, sale, or holding out for resale, in addition to the tax on such liquid (if any).

#### (b) Penalty in the case of retailers

Any person who knowingly holds out for sale (other than for resale) any liquid described in subsection (a), shall pay a penalty of $10,000 for each such holding out for sale, in addition to the tax on such liquid (if any).

(Added Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11167(a), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1977.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11167(d), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1978, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section and amending section 9503 of this title] shall apply to any transfer, sale, or holding out for sale or resale occurring after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 10, 2005]."
## Breadcrumb

-  Research 
-  Pacific Northwest Research Station 
-                       Search PNW                  

#### Topic

              - Climate Change(3) - Adaptation(1)
- Carbon(2)
- Climate Change Effects(1)
 
              - Ecology(5)
              - Environment and People(3) - Communities and Jobs(2)
- Economics(1)
 
              - Fire(4) - Prescribed Fire(3)
- Smoke(2)
 
              - Fish and Wildlife(6) - Fish(2)
 
              - Forest and Plant Health(5) - Exotic and Invasive Species(1)
- Pest Management(1)
 
              - Forest Products(3) - Bioenergy and Biomass(1)
- Forest Products Industry(1)
- Harvest Techniques, Operations and Optimization(1)
 
              - Inventory, Monitoring and Analysis(2) - Assessments(1)
- Monitoring(1)
 
              - Managing the Land(10) - Conservation(1)
- Ecosystem Services(2)
- Forest Management(7) - Riparian(3)
- Silviculture(5)
 
- Landscape Management(2)
- Restoration and Recovery(1)
 
              - Water, Air and Soil(2) - Soil(1)
- Water(1)
 

#### Year

              - 2019(1)
              - 2018(1)
              - 2017(1)
              - 2016(1)
              - 2015(1)
              - 2011(1)
              - 2010(2)
              - 2008(3)
              - 2007(1)
              - 2006(2)
              - 2005(4)
              - 2004(4)
              - 2003(3)
              - 2002(3)

# Search PNW

& Sort 

## 									Western forests, fire risk, and climate change.							

**Science****Update**

## 									Dynamic landscape management.							

**Science****Update**

## 									Warming in the Cold North							

Rachel  WhiteJanet  PreveyTeresa  HollingsworthHans  Andersen

**Science****Update**

## 									Fuel treatments: Are we doing enough?							

Rachel  WhiteMorris  JohnsonNicole  VaillantJeremy  Fried

**Science****Update**

## 									Smoke in a new era of fire							

Rachel WhitePaul HessburgSim LarkinMorgan Varner

**Science****Update**

## 									Restoring rivers, sustaining communities							

Rachel WhiteSusan CharnleyGordon GrantMary RowlandMichael Wisdom

**Science****Update**

## 									Fire risk in east-side forests.							

**Science****Update**

## 									Restoring complexity: second-growth forests and habitat diversity.							

**Science****Update**

## 									Managing forests after fires							

**science****Science****Update**

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-  Next pageNext › 
-  Last pageLast »
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4566 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4566

   To withdraw certain lands in Los Angeles County, California, from 
 entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2016

 Mr. Knight (for himself, Mr. Sherman, Ms. Judy Chu of California, and 
 Mr. Schiff) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To withdraw certain lands in Los Angeles County, California, from 
 entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Soledad Canyon Consistency Act''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN LANDS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Withdrawal From Mineral Entry.--Subject to valid existing 
rights, if any, the lands described in subsection (b) are withdrawn 
from--
            (1) entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land 
        laws;
            (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
            (3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral materials, 
        and geothermal leasing laws.
    (b) Lands Described.--
            (1) In general.--The lands referred to in subsection (a) 
        consist of approximately 640.16 acres depicted as ``Soledad 
        Canyon Sand & Gravel Mining Project Site'' on the Bureau of 
        Land Management map entitled ``Soledad Canyon Map A'' and dated 
        January 21, 2016.
            (2) Effect.--The map referred to in paragraph (1) shall 
        have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, 
        except that the Secretary of the Interior may correct minor 
        errors in the map.
            (3) Availability.--The Secretary shall make the map 
        referred to in paragraph (1) available in the appropriate 
        offices of the Bureau of Land Management.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Westchester Title & Trust Company (Series 18-F). Davey Tree Expert Company, Inc., Appellant; Edward W. Stitt, Jr., et al., as Successor Trustees, Respondents. In the Matter of Lawyers Westchester Mortgage and Title Company (Issue 2-7855). Davey Tree Expert Company, Inc., Appellant; Edward W. Stitt, Jr., et al., as Successor Trustees, Respondents.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
#### Villa Park Association of Great Neck, etc., Plaintiff, v. The Town of North Hempstead and Others, Defendants.

The application to resettle the order entered in this action is denied. Although the title of the action is “Villa Park Association of Great Neck on Behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,” no one has intervened and asked to be made a party plaintiff, nor is there any evidence as to the identity of persons claiming to be similarly situated with plaintiff. In the memorandum submitted on the motion to resettle the order counsel state that the town board have no power to cancel the tax, but that this must be done by the board of super*911visors. They are not parties to this action. They cannot he required to act by any judgment made herein either to cancel the taxor to refund the money paid. If they were such parties there is no proof before us as to the sums paid, by whom paid, or whether such payments were voluntarily made or otherwise. If, because of the failure to make the board of supervisors parties to this action, the relief awarded to plaintiff is incomplete, this can only be remedied by a direct proceeding against the officials whose action is necessarily required. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
#### Southern School Book Depository *v.*Ginn & Company *et al.*

February 18, 1911.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Meadow. Elbert superior court. September 16, 1909.

*Z. B. Bogers,*for plaintiff in error. *G. P. Harris,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

1. Where several attachments in favor of different persons were levied on different articles of personalty which had been jointly purchased at one time by several purchasers from the defendant in attachment before the levy of the attachments, such purchasers can not require the attaching creditors, in one equitable suit instituted for that purpose, to contest with them the issue whether the property is subject to attachment, without alleging that the attack on the validity of the plaintiffs’ title involves a question common to all the attaching creditors.

*(a)*In the case of *Smith*v. *Dobbins,*87 *Ga.*303 (13 S. E. 496), the attack upon the plaintiff’s title by the several plaintiffs in ff. fa. involved the same question. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         5,996,800
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      50,600
<MORTGAGE>                                      24,000
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   71,700
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               6,404,400
<CASH>                                          38,500
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         467,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,841,500
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 587,700
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        5,473,100
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                152,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          217,900<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     549,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,841,500
<PREMIUMS>                                     166,100
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            379,300
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              14,800
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  36,300
<BENEFITS>                                     328,100
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     50,800
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            96,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of subsidiary trusts.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT F

INTCOMEX WORKS

Case 1:20-cv-22393-CMA Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-22393-CMA Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
          This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
          Associated  Technologies and Subsidiaries September 30, 1997 financial
          statements  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference  to such
          financial statements.
 </LEGEND>

<CIK>                    0000894565     
<NAME>                   Associated Technologies

       
<S>
                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                    0
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             1,234,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               253,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          2,208,651
<PP&E>                                                    366,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (270,411)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            2,632,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     2,480,427
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  2,304
<OTHER-SE>                                                26,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              2,632,567
<SALES>                                                   1,370,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          1,370,351
<CGS>                                                     681,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             681,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          1,228,801
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (741,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (540,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (741,171)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (.34)
        


</TABLE>