alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe ARPANET after twenty yearsThe ARPANET began operations in 1969 with four nodes as an experiment in resource sharing among computers. It has evolved into a worldwide research network of over 60,000 nodes, influencing the design of other networks in business, education, and government. It demonstrated the speed and reliability of packet-switching networks. Its protocols have served as the models for international standards. And yet the significance of the ARPANET lies not in its technology, but in the profound alterations networking has produced in human practices. Network designers must now turn their attention to the discourses of scientific technology, business, education, and government that are being mixed together in the milieux of networking, and in particular the conflicts and misunderstandings that arise from the different world views of these discourses.Document ID19920002477Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsDenning, Peter J.*(Research Inst. for Advanced Computer Science Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 20, 1989Subject CategoryComputer SystemsReport/Patent NumberRIACS-TR-89-38NASA-CR-188853NAS 1.26:188853Accession Number92N11695Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-387Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920002477.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: October 18, 2006
    
    /s/ William D. Green

William D. GreenChief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd,General Partner of Accenture SCA(principal executive officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 4.612 What documentation of fees and expenses must I provide? ( a ) Your application must be accompanied by full documentation of the fees and expenses for which you seek an award, including the cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project, or similar matter.
( b ) You must submit a separate itemized statement for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the application, showing: ( 1 ) The hours spent in connection with the proceeding by each individual;
( 2 ) A description of the specific services performed;
( 3 ) The rates at which each fee has been computed;
( 4 ) Any expenses for which reimbursement is sought;
( 5 ) The total amount claimed; and
( 6 ) The total amount paid or payable by you or by any other person or entity for the services provided.
( c ) The adjudicative officer may require you to provide vouchers, receipts, logs, or other substantiation for any fees or expenses claimed, in accordance with § 4.624.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Neoware, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Kantrowitz,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.




/s/ MICHAEL KANTROWITZ
-------------------------------------------
Michael Kantrowitz
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
May 3, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 10.5


 


March 23, 2021


 


Northern Genesis Sponsor III LLC


c/o Northern Genesis Holdings Inc.


4801 Main Street, Suite 1000


Kansas City, MO 64112


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm
our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement
(the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. III (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the
consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described
in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
Northern Genesis Sponsor III LLC (the “Sponsor”) shall make available to the Company certain office space,
utilities, and secretarial and other administrative services as may reasonably be required by the Company (in the aggregate, the
“Services”) from time to time, situated at 4801 Main Street, Suite 1000, Kansas City, MO 64112 (or any
successor location).


 


In exchange therefore,
the Company shall pay the Sponsor the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the
Termination Date.


 


The Sponsor hereby
agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust
account (the “Trust Account”) to be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”),
hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future, and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever,
in each case as a result of or arising out of this agreement or the performance or non-performance hereof. The Company hereby agrees
that recourse against the Sponsor in connection with the provision of the Services or any payments made in respect thereof shall
be strictly limited to the termination of this agreement by the Company.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




    


     


    

 



	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	NORTHERN GENESIS ACQUISITION CORP. III
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Ian Robertson
	 	 	Ian Robertson
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer



  


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:	 	 
	 	 	 
	NORTHERN GENESIS SPONSOR III LLC	 	 



 


	By:	Northern Genesis Holdings Inc., 
	 	its Managing Member	 	 



 


	By:	/s/ Ian Robertson	 
	 	Ian Robertson	 
	 	President	 


 


[Signature Page to Administrative Services Agreement]
**Exhibit 12.2**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Klaus Kühn, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Bayer AG;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.  The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.  The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 15, 2005         /s/ Klaus Kühn   Title:Chief Financial Officer   Member of the Board of Management
### §7001. Collection of foreign items

#### (a) License

All persons undertaking as a matter of business or for profit the collection of foreign payments of interest or dividends by means of coupons, checks, or bills of exchange shall obtain a license from the Secretary and shall be subject to such regulations enabling the Government to obtain the information required under subtitle A (relating to income taxes) as the Secretary shall prescribe.

#### (b) Penalty for failure to obtain license

**For penalty for failure to obtain the license provided for in this section, see section 7231.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 845; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.
#### § 3836.24 If BLM approves my petition, what else must I do to obtain a deferment of assessment work?

You must record a copy of BLM's decision regarding your petition in the local recording office.
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

May 22,2013 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 

Pt=CEIVED 

MAY 2 8 2013 

Ht:.ARING DOCKET 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Re: In re Scott Novak, DOT Docket No. TBA; DMS No. FAA-2012-0206 

I hereby file my Notice of Appearance in this matter. Going forward, I will be the 

attorney of record and all commuuications for the Federal Aviation Administration 

should be addressed to Charles Raley at the address below. 

Sincerely, 

Peter Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

By: 0[2_ 

Charles Raley, Attorney 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Phone: (202) 267-3357 

Facsimile: (202) 267-5106 

Email: charles.raley@faa.gov 

Cc: Joseph W. Geldhof, Esq. 

2 Marine Way, Suite 207 

Juneau, AK 99801
**Exhibit10.9**

 
| **FORM  OF  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT STOCK OPTION** |
|-------------------------------------------------|

 

This Employment AgreementStock Option, dated as of               , is by and between **MediCor Ltd., and it’s subsidiaries** (collectively,the “Corporation”) and                            (the “Employee”)

 

Effective as of                         (the “Effective Date”), the Employee will receive an Employment Option (the“Option”)                                                                                                                                ****(                  ) shares of the Corporation’s CommonStock, at a composite price of **            DOLLARS AND               ****CENTS($    .     )** per shareto be vested as follows: **25% PER YEAR FOR EACH FULL YEAR OF EMPLOYMENT FROM THEEMPLOYMENT DATE OF THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT.**

 

The Option will expire seven (7) years from theEffective Date identified herein, or upon termination of employment (as hereinprovided), whichever first occurs. The Option is not a part of theCorporation’s Stock Compensation Plan (if any), are not transferable and may beexercised only by the Employee, the Employee’s executor or spouse. Continuedemployment with the Corporation is a condition of the vesting of the Options.The Option may be exercised within six (6) months of the termination ofemployment of the Employee, unless the Employee’s employment is terminated “ForCause” as provided in Section         of theEmployee’s Employment Agreement, in which case the unvested portion of theOption terminates at the date of termination of the Employee. The Employee willexecute such other documents and make such representations as may be requiredfor securities or other regulatory compliance.

 

The number of shares andthe option price subject to the Option, shall be adjusted for any stockdividend, split-up, combination or exchange of shares, or any other similarchange.

 

In the event of a Changeof Control in ownership of the Corporation (defined for the purpose of thisAgreement as the purchase of more than fifty percent (50%) of the Corporation’soutstanding shares by a shareholder who, at the date of this Agreement is not ashareholder of the Corporation), all shares of the Option shall vest and beavailable for purchase within thirty (30) days of notification by the Corporationto the Employee of the Change of Control.

 

**INWITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties hereto have executed thisExhibit C to Employment Agreement to be effective as of the          day of **                     **.

 
|   | **CORPORATION:** |
|--------|------------------|
|   | **MediCor Ltd.** |
|   |             |
|   | By:              |   |   |
|   |             | Donald K. McGhan |
|   | Title:           | Chairman of the Board |
|   |             |
|   | **EMPLOYEE:**    |
|   |             |
|   |             |   |
|        |                  |  |  |  |  |

 

**Exhibit      to Employment Agreement**

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 641

 641

 644

 644

 641

 647

 647

 648

 649

 653

 653

 652

 666

 664

 664

 657

 657

 650

 669

 652

 643

 0

 648

 647

 639

 643

 635

 630

 627

 625

 621

 546

 551

 548

 533

 477

 487

 522

 538

 535

 548

 558

 557

 520

 550

 560

 538

 536

 549

 555

 636

 553

 0

 552

 578

 583

 619

 611

 611

 583

 610

 604

 614

 622

 621

 603

 592

 590

 594

 600

 601

 601

 609

 610

 607

 627

 620

 614

 620

 605

 620

 643

 602

 0

 625

 631

 626

 628

 626

 623

 615

 618

 614

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
§ 7.1 Purpose. ( a ) The regulations in this part implement provisions of the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470aa-mm) by establishing the uniform definitions, standards, and procedures to be followed by all Federal land managers in providing protection for archaeological resources, located on public lands and Indian lands of the United States. These regulations enable Federal land managers to protect archaeological resources, taking into consideration provisions of the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (92 Stat. 469; 42 U.S.C. 1996), through permits authorizing excavation and/or removal of archaeological resources, through civil penalties for unauthorized excavation and/or removal, through provisions for the preservation of archaeological resource collections and data, and through provisions for ensuring confidentiality of information about archaeological resources when disclosure would threaten the archaeological resources.
( b ) The regulations in this part do not impose any new restrictions on activities permitted under other laws, authorities, and regulations relating to mining, mineral leasing, reclamation, and other multiple uses of the public lands.
[49 FR 1027, Jan. 6, 1984, as amended at 60 FR 5260, Jan. 26, 1995]
Exhibit 4.413

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182085 dated June 17, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Telematic services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until June 17, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 06, 2020 No. 145-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:
  MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS 
   COMMUNICATIONS 
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION 
   IN THE SPHERE 
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION 
   TECHNOLOGY 
   AND MASS MEDIA 
   PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119143
§ 4.1373 Hearing. ( a ) If a hearing is requested, the administrative law judge shall convene the hearing within 90 days of receipt of the responses under § 4.1372(b). The 90-day deadline for convening the hearing may be waived for a definite time by the written agreement of all parties, filed with the administrative law judge, or may be extended by the administrative law judge, in response to a motion setting forth good cause to do so, if no other party is prejudiced by the extension.
( b ) The administrative law judge shall give notice of the hearing at least 10 days in advance of the date of the hearing.
[59 FR 54362, Oct. 28, 1994; 59 FR 56573, Nov. 14, 1994]
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

		NO. 2-03-157-CV

GREEN FLY S.R.1., FREEAIR, S.P.A.,                                      APPELLANTS

FREEAIR SYSTEM, S.R.1., ELITALIANA 

S.P.A., AND MANFREDO WINDISCH-GRAETZ	

	V.

BELL HELICOPTER SERVICES, INC., 					 APPELLEES

BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, A DIVISION 

OF TEXTRON CANADA LIMITED, AND BELL 

HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC.

	------------

	FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the parties “Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

	Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL B:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 8, 2004
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Walk Devastated Area Interpretive Trail

Lassen Volcanic National Park
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis Bleight, Appellant.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Townley, J., dissent and vote to affirm.
#### § 9239.2-3 Responsibility for execution of law.

The execution of this law devolves primarily upon the officers of the Department of Justice, but as it is the purpose to free the public lands from unlawful enclosures and obstructions, it is deemed incumbent upon the officers of the Department of the Interior to furnish the officers of the Department of Justice with the evidence necessary to a successful prosecution of the law.
#### Albert E. McKenzie, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Graves-Quinn Corporation, Respondent, v. Irving Trust Company, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *post,*p. 996.]
§ 5451.3 Performance bond reduction. ( a ) As contract provisions are satisfactorily completed, the authorized officer may, in his discretion, reduce the amount of the required performance bond: *Provided, however,* That the amount of the performance bond shall not be reduced below the minimum required by § 5451.1 until ( 1 ) Payment of no less than 60 percent of the total purchase price has been made, or
( 2 ) Road construction required under the contract has been completed, the value of which when combined with contract payments is equal to no less than 60 percent of the total purchase price.
( b ) At the request of the purchaser, when the requirements set forth in the proviso to paragraph (a) of this section have been met, the amount of the performance bond may be reduced to 10 percent of the total purchase price or the entire cost of the uncompleted post-harvest contract requirements, whichever is greater. The amount of the performance bond shall not be reduced below 10 percent of the total purchase price until payment for all the timber sold under the terms of the contract is complete.
( c ) For the purpose of this section, the value of completed road construction shall be based on the Bureau's appraisal allowance.
Satisfactory completion of portions of the required road construction, to reasonable points that can be easily identified in the road construction appraisal, shall be considered as completed road construction for the purpose of this section. [55 FR 19886, May 14, 1990]
#### Dennis E. Finn, an Infant, by Veronica Finn, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Nathan Sachs, Respondent. [Consolidated Actions.]

*866Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.