alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Yu Zhu NI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES,1 Respondent.

No. 04-5025-AGNAC.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 1, 2006.

Thomas V. Massucci, New York, New York, for Petitioner.

Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Varuni Nelson, Denise McGinn, Assistant United States Attorneys, Central Islip, New York, for Respondent.

PRESENT: Hon. JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Hon. ROBERT D. SACK, and Hon. ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

1

. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales is automatically substituted for former Attorney General John Ashcroft as the respondent in this case.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is hereby DENIED.

Yu Zhu Ni, through counsel, petitions for review of the BIA decision denying her *627motion to reconsider the BIA’s decision affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history.

We review the BIA’s denial of Ni’s motion under the abuse of discretion standard. *Zhong Guang Sun v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*421 F.3d 105, 107 (2d Cir.2005). An abuse of discretion may be found where the BIA’s decision “provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or conclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board has acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner.” *Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*265 F.3d 83, 93 (2d Cir.2001).

A motion to reconsider must specify errors of fact or law and be supported by pertinent authority. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1). Ni did not allege any errors of fact or law that were not previously raised, nor did she allege any errors of fact or law that could not have been raised before the BIA previously. Ni’s motion argues that the BIA and IJ erred in rejecting her explanation for why there was incorrect information in her asylum application and household registration booklet. The BIA had already rejected Ni’s arguments when she appealed the decision of the IJ. Accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ni’s motion on this ground.

Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED. Having completed our review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DENIED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34(d)(1).
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 06 74 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 217 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
§ 9239.6-1 Turpentine. For turpentine trespass in a State where there is no State law governing such trespass, the measure of damages will be as follows: ( a ) *Innocent trespass.* Value of the gum and injury done to the trees. United States v. Taylor (35 Fed. 484).
( b ) *Willful trespass.* Value of the product manufactured from the crude turpentine by the settler, or any person into whose possession same may have passed, without credit for labor bestowed on the turpentine by the wrongdoer. Union Naval Stores Co. v. United States (240 U.S. 284, 60 L. ed. 644).
#### § 9185.3-3 Majority of land owners.

A majority of the settlers in each township are required to join in the application, and, in addition, there must appear the endorsements of the entrymen and owners, including the State, whose holdings represent the major part of the area entered or patented, with a description opposite each name of the lands actually occupied, entered, or owned, and a statement as to whether the applicant is a settler, entryman, or owner thereof. Where an entryman or owner, including the State, has failed for any reason whatsoever to join in the application, evidence of service of notice upon him for at least 30 days in advance of the filing of the application is required in order that he may be afforded ample opportunity to make timely protest against the granting of such resurvey if in his opinion such action is undesirable.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A


                               STAR DOLPHIN, INC.
             (exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

         NEVADA                                             87-0438634
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                          Identification Number)

3098 South Highland Drive, Suite 460
Salt Lake City, Utah                                        84106
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (801) 485-7775

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

     The undersigned  registrant  hereby amends the following  items,  financial
statements,  exhibits or other portions of its Form 10-Q dated August 8, 1996 as
set forth in the page attached hereto:

                      Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule




<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                 STAR DOLPHIN, INC.


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ Krista Nielson
                                 Krista Nielson, President, CEO and Director


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ David R. Yeaman
                                 David R. Yeaman, Secretary/Treasurer,
                                                  CFO and Director
Exhibit 4.444

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182546 dated July 28, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Telematic services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until July 28, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 23, 2020 No. 172-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Terlyakov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS,
   INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119599
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group, Subcommittee I—Career Development NCI-I Initial Review of Training Grants.                    

*Date:*                         November 3-4, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         7:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Wyndham City Center Hotel, 1143 New Hampshire Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20037.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Robert Bird, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Resources and Training Review Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Blvd., MSC 8328, Room 8113, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, 301-496-7978,                         *birdr@mail.nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93,393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 29, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-22404 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Century
Properties  Fund XXII 2000 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000740156
<NAME>                                Century Properties Fund XXII
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    3,143
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                  136,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                           61,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           81,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                  72,249
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                6,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             81,020
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          5,702
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          5,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        1,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                649
<EPS-BASIC>                                                6.90 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
PMN Sanitized file of (no Calcium) Selenastrum capricornutum 96-hour growth inhibition test
#### Murray W. Harris, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

In our opinion the plaintiff established a prima facie case. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Officer’sCertification**

 

I, Preston A. Miller, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (“AmeriCredit”), certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K/A, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicingreports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annualreport, of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2001-B;

2.               Based on my knowledge, the information inthese reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the servicinginformation required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under thesale and servicing agreement is included in these reports;

4.               I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the servicer under the sale and servicing agreement and based uponthe review required under the sale and servicing agreement, and except asdisclosed in the report, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under thesale and servicing agreement; and

5.               The reports disclose all significantdeficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the sale andservicing agreement, that is included in these reports.

 
| Date: April 21, 2004                   |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   | /s/ Preston A. Miller |   |
| Preston  A. Miller                     |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
### PART II—FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN INFORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

Sec.
6721.
Failure to file correct information returns.
6722.
Failure to furnish correct payee statements.
6723.
Failure to comply with other information reporting requirements.
6724.
Waiver; definitions and special rules.
6725.
Failure to report information under section 4101.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §863(d)(2), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1620, added item 6725.

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7711(a), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2388, substituted "COMPLY WITH CERTAIN INFORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS" for "FILE CERTAIN INFORMATION RETURNS OR STATEMENTS" in part heading and substituted "correct" for "certain" in items 6721 and 6722 and "comply with other information reporting requirements" for "include correct information" in item 6723.
### §5112. Registration and regulation

Every person claiming drawback under this subpart shall register annually with the Secretary; keep such books and records as may be necessary to establish the fact that distilled spirits received by him and on which the tax has been determined were used in the manufacture or production of medicines, medicinal preparations, food products, flavors, flavoring extracts, or perfume, which were unfit for use for beverage purposes; and be subject to such rules and regulations in relation thereto as the Secretary shall prescribe to secure the Treasury against frauds.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1345, §5132; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 103–465, title I, §136(b), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4841; renumbered §5112, Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11125(b)(3)(A), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1953.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5112, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1340, defined "dealer", "wholesale dealer in liquors", and "wholesale dealer in beer", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11125(a)(1)(C), (c), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1953, 1957, effective July 1, 2008, but inapplicable to taxes imposed for periods before such date.

Another prior section 5112, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 618, contained definitions of wholesale dealers, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–59 renumbered section 5132 of this title as this section.

1994—Pub. L. 103–465 substituted "flavoring extracts, or perfume" for "or flavoring extracts".

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective Jan. 1, 1995, see section 136(d) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
§ 4.411 Appeal; how taken, mandatory time limit. ( a ) A person who wishes to appeal to the Board must file a notice that the person wishes to appeal. ( 1 ) The notice of appeal must be filed in the office of the officer who made the decision (not the Board).
( 2 ) Except as otherwise provided by law: ( i ) A person served with the decision being appealed must transmit the notice of appeal in time for it to be received in the appropriate office no later than 30 days after the date of service of the decision; and
( ii ) If a decision is published in the Federal Register, a person not served with the decision must transmit the notice of appeal in time for it to be received in the appropriate office no later than 30 days after the date of publication.
( b ) The notice of appeal must give the serial number or other identification of the case. The notice of appeal may include a statement of reasons for the appeal, and a statement of standing if required by § 4.412(b).
( c ) No extension of time will be granted for filing the notice of appeal. If a notice of appeal is filed after the grace period provided in § 4.401(a), the notice of appeal will not be considered and the case will be closed by the officer from whose decision the appeal is taken. If the notice of appeal is filed during the grace period provided in § 4.401(a) and the delay in filing is not waived, as provided in that section, the notice of appeal will not be considered and the appeal will be dismissed by the Board.
( d ) After receiving a timely notice of appeal, the office of the officer who made the decision must promptly forward to the Board: ( 1 ) The notice of appeal;
( 2 ) Any statement of reasons, statement of standing, and other documents included with the notice of appeal; and
( 3 ) The complete administrative record compiled during the officer's consideration of the matter leading to the decision being appealed.
(R.S. 2478, as amended, 43 U.S.C. 1201; sec. 25, Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, as amended, 43 U.S.C. 1601-1628; and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551, *et seq.*)
[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 15117, Aug. 13, 1971; 49 FR 6373, Feb. 21, 1984; 75 FR 64665, Oct. 20, 2010]