alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    103,415
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,415
<PP&E>                                         153,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20,054
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,130
<OTHER-SE>                                     221,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   250,944
<SALES>                                        364,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               364,929
<CGS>                                          94,148
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  94,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,430)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20,589)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.002


</TABLE>
# Amtsblatt C 249I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 249I |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 63. Jahrgang29. Juli 2020 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 249I

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

63. Jahrgang29. Juli 2020

---

| Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informationen |
| | INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION |
| | Rat |
| 2020/C 249 I/01 | Annahme von Änderungen der Geschäftsordnung von Eurojust | 1 |

Inhalt

Seite

IV   Informationen

INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION

Rat

2020/C 249 I/01

Annahme von Änderungen der Geschäftsordnung von Eurojust

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

IV Informationen

INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION

Rat

| 29.7.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CI 249/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CI 249/1

---

Annahme von Änderungen der Geschäftsordnung von Eurojust

(2020/C 249 I/01)

Das Kollegium von Eurojust hat am 24. Juli 2020 Änderungen der Geschäftsordnung von Eurojust angenommen (1). Diese Änderungen sind dem Durchführungsbeschluss (EU) 2020/1114 des Rates vom 23. Juli 2020 (2) beigefügt.

Im Namen des Kollegiums von Eurojust

Ladislav HAMRAN

Präsident von Eurojust

---

(1)  Vom Rat mit Durchführungsbeschluss (EU) 2019/2250 vom 19. Dezember 2019 gebilligt (ABl. L 336 vom 30.12.2019, S. 309) und vom Kollegium am 20. Dezember 2019 angenommen (ABl. L 50 vom 24.2.2020, S. 1).

1

(2)  ABl. L 244 vom 29.7.2020, S. 13

2

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-22054-DPG

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 

3G LICENSING S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NOETIC, INC. and SUN CUPID 

TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD., 

Defendants.

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

Plaintiffs, SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 3G LICENSING S.A. and SISVEL S.p.A. 

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants, SUN CUPID TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD and 

NOETIC, INC (“Defendants”, and with Plaintiffs the “Parties” ), by and through their 

undersigned counsel, hereby give notice that the Parties have settled the instant case. The Parties’ 

negotiated and finalized Settlement Agreement is currently being executed by the Parties. The 

Parties request that all deadlines be stayed by the Court until the Parties have finished signing the 

Settlement Agreement and they file their notices of dismissal. 

[SIGNATURES ON SUBSEQUENT PAGE] 

Case 1:20-cv-22054-DPG Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully Submitted: 

GRAYROBISON, P.A. 

/s/ Jorge Espinosa

Jorge Espinosa, Esq.

Florida Bar No: 779032

jorge.espinosa@gray-robinson.com

Francesca Russo, Esq.

Florida Bar No.:174912

francesca.russo@gray-robinson.com

Robert R. Jimenez, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 72020

Robert.jimenez@gray-robinson.com

GRAY | ROBINSON, P.A.

333 S.E. 2nd Ave., Suite 300

Miami, FL 33131

Tel: 305-416-6880

Fax: 305-416-6887 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 

3G LICENSING S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A 

THE LAW OFFICE OF HONGWEI 

SHANG, LLC 

/s/ Hongwei Shang 

Hongwei Shang, Esq. 

Florida Bar No: 0037199

hshanglaw@gmail.com 

THE LAW OFFICE OF HONGWEI 

SHANG, LLC 

7350 SW 89th Street, Suite 100 

Miami, FL 33156 

Tel: 305-670-5266 

Fax: 305-670-5299 

Attorney for Defendants 

NOETIC, INC. and SUN CUPID 

TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD

Case 1:20-cv-22054-DPG Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §3307. Deductions as constructive payments

Whenever under this chapter or any act of Congress, or under the law of any State, an employer is required or permitted to deduct any amount from the remuneration of an employee and to pay the amount deducted to the United States, a State, or any political subdivision thereof, then for purposes of this chapter the amount so deducted shall be considered to have been paid to the employee at the time of such deduction.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 454.)
§ 4.353 Record. ( a ) The administrative judge shall lodge the original record with the Project Director.
( b ) The record shall contain, where applicable, the following materials: ( 1 ) A copy of the posted public notice of preliminary determination and/or hearing showing the posting certifications, the administrative judge's certificate of mailing, the posting certificates, and the Project Director's certificate of mailing.
( 2 ) A copy of each notice served on parties in interest, with proof of mailing;
( 3 ) The record of evidence received, including any transcript made of testimony;
( 4 ) Data for heirship finding and family history, and data supplementary thereto;
( 5 ) The final order determining the heirs of the decedent and the administrative judge's notices thereof; and
( 6 ) Any other material or documents deemed relevant by the administrative judge.
EXHIBIT

“A”

Under Seal

Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 142-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2023 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1





Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Accenture SCA (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joe
W. Forehand, Chief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    Joe W. Forehand





Joe W. Forehand


Chief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd


Dated:  November 7, 2002
```

[108th Congress Public Law 498]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ498.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 4020]]

Public Law 108-498
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To limit the transfer of certain Commodity Credit Corporation funds 
     between conservation programs for technical assistance for the 
             programs. <<NOTE: Dec. 23, 2004 -  [S. 2856]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1241 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 
U.S.C. 3841) is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(b) Technical Assistance.--Effective for fiscal year 2005 and each 
subsequent fiscal year, Commodity Credit Corporation funds made 
available for each of the programs specified in paragraphs (1) through 
(7) of subsection (a)--
            ``(1) shall be available for the provision of technical 
        assistance for the programs for which funds are made available; 
        and
            ``(2) shall not be available for the provision of technical 
        assistance for conservation programs specified in subsection (a) 
        other than the program for which the funds were made 
        available.''.

    (b) Effective Date.--The <<NOTE: 16 USC 3841 note.>> amendment made 
by subsection (a) takes effect on October 1, 2004.

    Approved December 23, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2856:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 6, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A


                               MACAW CAPITAL, INC.
             (exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

         NEVADA                                             87-0438639
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                          Identification Number)

3098 South Highland Drive, Suite 460
Salt Lake City, Utah                                        84106
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (801) 485-7775

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

     The undersigned  registrant  hereby amends the following  items,  financial
statements,  exhibits or other portions of its Form 10-Q dated August 8, 1996 as
set forth in the page attached hereto:

                      Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule




<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                 MACAW CAPITAL, INC.


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ Krista Nielson
                                 Krista Nielson, President, CEO and Director


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ David R. Yeaman
                                 David R. Yeaman, Secretary/Treasurer,
                                                  CFO and Director
#### In the Matter of Lucian Lamm, Respondent, against Andrew J. Clauson, Jr., et al., Constituting the Board of Education of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

The board of education was under no duty to act on the nomination of respondent until the presentation of the nomination at a meeting of the board, at which time it was empowered to act. Concededly the nomination was not so presented but was withdrawn by the superintendent of schools before the regular meeting of the board, on December 30,1947. Under the scheme of the statute, which provides for a nomination by the superintendent and appointment by the board, respondent’s nomination by the superintendent was not final and irrevocable and, at any time prior to action by the board, could be withdrawn for proper reasons, which may include error in judgment of the facts in the making of the nomination. (Cf. *Matter of Equitable Trust Co.*v. *Hamilton,*226 N. Y. 241.) Furthermore, the board was not under a time limitation to act on December 30,1947, on the nomination by the superintendent. It may be that as a result of the failure to act at that meeting or before the first of the ensuing month, the civil service list of eligibles, headed by the petitioner, expired. This may have affected the respondent adversely, but does not provide a legal right which would require the board to act *nunc pro tune.*Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
# STATEOFLOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2022 KW 0015 VERSUS TONY JOSEPH TABOR MARCH 14, 2022 In Re: 

### Tony Joseph Tabor, applying for supervisory writs, 32°d 

### Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, Nos. 447,948 & 476,610. BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ. WRIT DENIED.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLE K OF COURT FOR THE COURT JMG GH WRC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CAFÉ, GELATO & PANINI LLC, d/b/a/ 

CAFÉ GELATO PANINI, on behalf of itself 

and all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., 

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P., M.S. 

MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., and 

THE TOWN CENTER AT BOCA RATON 

TRUST, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 0:20-cv-60981-AMC 

 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree that the claims and 

counterclaims in the above-referenced matter are dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 41, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the settlement 

agreement executed contemporaneously with this stipulation. 

The parties jointly request that the Court retain jurisdiction over this matter for 60 days 

following the execution of the aforementioned settlement agreement. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

BUCKNER + MILES 

/s/David M. Buckner 

David M. Buckner 

Seth E. Miles 

Brett E. von Borke 

2020 Salzedo Street, Suite 302 

Coral Gables, Florida 33134 

Telephone: 305.964.8003 

david@bucknermiles.com 

seth@bucknermiles.com 

vonborke@bucknermiles.com 

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 

/s/ Ursula Ungaro 

Ursula Ungaro 

Florida Bar No. 200883 

uungaro@bsfllp.com

100 SE Second Street Suite 2800 M 

Miami, FL 33131 

Telephone: (305) 357-8432 

Facsimile: (305) 536-1307 

Case 0:20-cv-60981-AMC Document 300 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2023 Page 1 of 2
2 

KELLEY | UUSTAL 

John J. Uustal 

Cristina M. Pierson 

Kelley Uustal 

500 North Federal Highway, Suite 200 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 

Telephone: 954.522.6601 

jju@kulaw.com 

cmp@kulaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Cafe, Gelato & Panini LLC, 

d/b/a/ Cafe Gelato Panini 

BERGER SINGERMAN LLP 

Mitchell W. Berger 

Florida Bar No. 311340 

mberger@bergersingerman.com 

Fred O. Goldberg 

Florida Bar No. 898619 

fgoldberg@bergersingerman.com 

1450 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1900 

Miami, FL 33131 

Telephone: (305) 755-9500 

Facsimile: (305) 714-4340 

BLANK ROME LLP 

James T. Smith (admitted pro hac vice) 

Daniel E. Rhynhart (admitted pro hac vice) 

One Logan Square 

130 North 18th Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Telephone: 215-569-5500 

Facsimile: 215-569-5555 

Smith-jt@BlankRome.com 

Rhynhart@BlankRome.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Simon Property Group, Inc., 

Simon Property Group, L.P., 

M.S. Management Associates, Inc., and 

The Town Center at Boca Raton Trust

So ORDERED by the Court on this ____ day of June, 2023.

 __________________________________ 

 AILEEN M. CANNON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

cc: Counsel of record. 

Case 0:20-cv-60981-AMC Document 300 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### Mary Guardino, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston and Lewis, JJ.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Southern District of Florida

KEY WEST POLICE & FIRE PENSION FUND, on

behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,

RYDER SYSTEM, INC., ROBERT E. SANCHEZ,

ART A. GARCIA, and SCOTT T. PARKER,

Scott T. Parker

11670 NW 6th Pl

Plantation, FL 33325-1914

Avi Josefson

Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP

1251 Avenue of the Americas, 44th Floor

New York, New York 10020

Case 1:20-cv-22109-JB Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/20/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

" I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

" I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

" I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

" I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

" Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 1:20-cv-22109-JB Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/20/2020 Page 2 of 2
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Leo A. Daly Company ) ) Under Contract No. W912HN-09-C-0034 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60106

J. Andrew Howard, Esq.

Alston & Bird, LLP Los Angeles, CA Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney LauraJ. Arnett, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney U.S. Army Engineer District, Savannah ORDER OF DISMISSAL The parties have filed ajoint stipulation ofdismissal with prejudice, representing that they have reached a settlement and executed a release agreement. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 23 August 2016

Administrative g Armed Services Boa ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60106, Appeal ofLeo A. Daly Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### Gerald Scully, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Village of Angola, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.
(No. 711

Claimant awarded $8,787.50.)

#### Herendeen Milling Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Franchise *tax*— when *refund may be awarded.*Although there may be no legal liability on behalf of the State, the court may as an act of social justice and equity award a refund of the tax erroneously paid.

Johnson, Moran, Paltzer *&*O’Donnell, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Edward C. Fitch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim to refund certain portions of franchise taxes paid erroneously to the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois by above claimant, in the years 1921, 1922 and 1923, total excess tax paid amounting to $8,787.50.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois is, as a matter of law, sustained.

On the grounds of social justice and equity, we award claimant the sum of $8,787.50.
§ 4.907 What if an IBLA decision requires ONRR or a delegated State to recalculate royalties or other payments? ( a ) An IBLA decision modifying an order or an ONRR Director's decision and requiring ONRR or a delegated State to recalculate royalties or other payments is a final decision in the administrative proceeding for purposes of 30 U.S.C. 1724(h).
( b ) ONRR or the delegated State must provide to IBLA and all parties any recalculation IBLA requires under paragraph (a) of this section within 60 days of receiving IBLA's decision.
( c ) There is no further appeal within the Department from ONRR's or the State's recalculation under paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) The IBLA decision issued under paragraph (a) of this section together with recalculation under paragraph (b) of this section are the final action of the Department that is judicially reviewable under 5 U.S.C. 704.
[64 FR 26259, May 13, 1999, as amended at 79 FR 62051, Oct. 16, 2014]