alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAYIDEN HUSSEIN MOHAMED, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

BELLINGER, Nurse Supervisor; 

STEWART ANDREWS, M.D., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-35710 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01669-RAJ 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 26, 2017**

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Sayiden Hussein Mohamed, a former inmate at Snohomish County Jail, 

appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical need. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 6 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-35710 

F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We may affirm on any basis supported by the 

record. Enlow v. Salem-Keizer Yellow Cab Co., 389 F.3d 802, 811 (9th Cir. 2004). 

We affirm. 

Summary judgment was proper because under any potentially applicable 

standard, Mohamed failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether 

defendants knew of and disregarded an excessive risk to Mohamed’s health. See 

Toguchi, 391 F.3d at 1057-58 (neither a prisoner’s difference of opinion 

concerning the course of treatment nor mere negligence in treating a medical 

condition amounts to deliberate indifference); Lolli v. County of Orange, 351 F.3d 

410, 418-19 (9th Cir. 2003) (pretrial detainee’s claim of medical deliberate 

indifference is analyzed under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause 

rather than under the Eighth Amendment, but same standards apply); see also

Castro v. County of Los Angeles, 833 F.3d 1060, 1067-71 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) 

(setting forth elements of Fourteenth Amendment failure-to-protect claim by 

pretrial detainee). 

Denial of Mohamed’s motion for appointment of counsel was proper 

because Mohamed failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances. See Palmer v. 

Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (setting forth standard of review and

exceptional circumstances requirement for appointment of counsel).

We reject Mohamed’s contention that he should have been appointed an
3 16-35710 

interpreter because Mohamed did not make such a request before the district court. 

AFFIRMED.
Adams, Kevin (OST)

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Hi All,

Adams, Kevin (OSn

Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:33 AM

OU-2, Kathy Noel; Sault Ste. Marie, Airport Manager, Kathy Noel; Sault Ste. Marie,

Mayor, Anthony Bosbous; Pellston, Airport Manager, Mr. Kelly Atkins; Pellston, Mayor,

James Gillett

Carrier, Delta, Sascha Vanderbellen

Request for Comment re the proposal of Delta Air Lines at Pellston and Sault Ste. Marie,

MI (the only carrier to bid)

Proposal, Delta, Pellston and Sault Ste. Marie.pdf

Attached above is a copy of the one timely-filed proposal for Essential Air Service (EAS) at Pellston and separately at

Sault Ste. Marie, submitted by Delta. We are currently reviewing those proposals. The attached proposals are directly

from the carrier and will soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regulations.gov at Sault Ste.

Marie, DOT-OST-2009-0303; and Pellston, DOT-OST-2011-0133, along with other pertinent information on this

proceeding.

The next step in the carrier-selection process is for you to provide us with each community's comments, a'critically

important element in our carrier-selection decision, especially the comments of civic officials. Accordingly, I ask that

everyone get back to us, preferably by email, no later than August 13, 2013. We will docket this email, as well as any

replies. .

In brief, look at the proposal, and if you have any questions, call me, and get back to us by the deadline, August 13.

Best,

Kevin Adams

202-366-1047

1.
### §712b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 97–391, §4, Dec. 29, 1982, 96 Stat. 1961; Pub. L. 100–139, §7(a), Oct. 26, 1987, 101 Stat. 828, which related to organization of tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §5611. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Indian tribe

The term "Indian tribe" has the meaning given the term in the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b).1

#### (2) Project

The term "Project" means the Indian trust asset management demonstration project established under section 5612(a) of this title.

#### (3) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior.

(Pub. L. 114–178, title II, §202, June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, referred to in par. (1), is Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, which was classified principally to subchapter II (§450 et seq.) of chapter 14 of this title prior to editorial reclassification as chapter 46 (§5301 et seq.) of this title. Definitions of terms in the Act were contained in section 450b of this title, which was editorially reclassified as section 5304 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration   

          - [TA-W-55,544]   

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 2, 2004, in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Canteen Vending, Hickory, North Carolina.   

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation would serve no purpose and the investigation has been terminated.   

      ( print page 60668)    
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of September, 2004.   

Elliott S. Kushner,   

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.   

[FR Doc. 04-22801 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]   

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
M&I 2003 Sch B-3A.Z07.xls

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS INCLUDED IN FISCAL YEAR 2003

2005 M&I WATER RATES

Voluntary Payments

Date Deficit 

Facility/Contractor Payments Received Prior Year Current Year 30-day window * Total Capital 

Contra Costa Canal

Contra Costa WD 208,990.00 1/ N/A 0.00 208,990.00 

40,981.00 2/ 9/6/02 40,981.00 40,981.00 

 2/ 10/2/02 31,789.00 31,789.00 31,789.00 

29,108.00 2/ 11/3/02 29,108.00 29,108.00 

 2/ 12/3/02 307,917.00 307,917.00 307,917.00  2/ 12/30/02 212,846.50 212,846.50 212,846.50  2/ 2/5/03 237,017.00 237,017.00 237,017.00 

139,722.00 2/ 3/7/03 139,722.00 139,722.00 

72,732.00 2/ 4/6/03 72,732.00 72,732.00 

151,844.00 2/ 5/5/03 151,844.00 151,844.00 123,134.00 2/ 6/5/03 123,134.00 123,134.00 

86,768.00 2/ 7/2/03 86,768.00 86,768.00 

105,933.70 2/ 7/24/03 105,933.70 105,933.70 109,897.26 2/ 9/5/03 109,897.26 109,897.26 204,938.52 2/ 10/2/03 204,938.52 204,938.52 

Delta-Mendota Canal

Plain View WD (531.80) 3/ 7/30/03 (531.80) (531.80) 

Folsom D&R

City of Roseville 238,186.27 4/ 8/13/03 171,262.25 171,262.25 

Friant-Kern Canal

Terra Bella ID 2,358.46 5/ 12/17/02 319.24 2,039.22 2,358.46 

Sacramento River

Riverview Golf & CC 16.86 10/8/02 16.86 16.86 

Toyon Pipeline

City of Shasta Lake 6/ N/A (51,775.76) (51,775.76) Total 2,303,647.77 (195.70) 2,027,929.45 (51,775.76) 1,975,957.99 208,990.00 

FOOTNOTES1/ Contra Costa WD - District's amendatory contract (dated May 26, 1994) requires payment at a fixed $2.50 per A/F administrative charge.

Revenue is creditable to capital repayment in the amount of $ 208,990.00.

2/ District's FY 2003 Rate Differential Payment.3/ Overpayment for the FY 2002 voluntary payment was refunded at the district's request.4/ As a result of the prior year interest recalculation, voluntary payment for the FY 2002 O&M deficit was not needed. Part of the payment was applied to the 2003 results of operations and 

5/ As a result of the prior year interest recalculation, the payment for the FY 2001 O&M deficit was reapplied to the prior year O&M deficit and the 2003 results of operations.6/ Contractor requested 2003 O&M surplus be refunded.* Based on the voluntary payment policy, contractors can qualify to pay for FY 2003 after the end of the year. Contractors are given a 30-day window to make payments. 

These payments are included and will be applied to FY 2003.

9/8/2004
#### SMITH, Superintendent of Banks, Appellant, v. HART, Respondent. (Mrs. Henry Struck, Garnishee.)

(207 N. W. 659.)

(File No. 6071.

Opinion filed March 12, 1926.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, McCook 'County; Hon. L. L. Fjxeger, Judge.

*R. M. Sheild,*of Salem, for Appellant.

*H. Van. Ruschm,*of Salem, for Respondent.

CAMPBELL, J.

This case involves the same question as Smith v. W. H. Hart in 49 S. D. —, 207 N. W. 657, this day decided, and upon the authority of that decision the order here appealed from is reversed.

MISER, Circuit Judge, sitting in lieu of SHERWOOD, J.
### §941n. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–116, §16, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1137, which related to tax treatment of income and transactions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 1 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 2 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 3 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 4 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 5 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 6 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 7 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 8 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 9 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 10 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 11 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 12 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 13 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 14 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 15 of 16
Case 0:20-cv-61007-AHS Document 30-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 16 of 16
##### 



Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARY
OF
LSB CORPORATION

Lawrence Savings Bank: LSB Corporations wholly owned subsidiary is a
Massachusetts-chartered savings bank organized in 1868 and headquartered at 30
Massachusetts Avenue, North Andover, Massachusetts.

SUBSIDIARIES
OF
LAWRENCE SAVINGS BANK

Pemberton Corporation: Holds real estate for sale.

Spruce Wood Realty Trust: Holds real estate used in the normal course of
business.

Shawsheen Security Corporation and Shawsheen Security Corporation II: Engages
exclusively in buying, selling, dealing in and holding investment securities on
its own behalf.

Each of the subsidiaries is organized or incorporated in Massachusetts.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4777 

To permit the Miami Nation of Indiana to apply for acknowledgment as 

a federally recognized Indian tribe, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 4, 2022 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To permit the Miami Nation of Indiana to apply for acknowledgment as a federally recognized Indian tribe, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. 

4 In this Act: 

5 (1) ACKNOWLEDGMENT.—The term ‘‘acknowl6 edgment’’ means acknowledgment as a federally rec7 ognized Indian tribe. 

8 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4777 IS

1 SEC. 2. MIAMI NATION OF INDIANA PERMITTED TO PETI2 TION FOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law (including regulations) that denies acknowledg5 ment to an entity that previously petitioned for and was 

6 denied acknowledgment, the Miami Nation of Indiana may 

7 submit a petition to the Secretary, under part 83 of title 

8 25, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date 

9 of enactment of this Act), for acknowledgment. 

10 (b) EFFECT ON DETERMINATION.—In reviewing and 

11 making a determination on a petition for acknowledgment 

12 that the Miami Nation of Indiana submitted, the Sec13 retary shall not use, as a reason to deny the petition for 

14 acknowledgment that the Miami Nation of Indiana sub15 mitted, any previous denial of a petition for acknowledg16 ment that the Miami Nation of Indiana submitted, includ17 ing— 

18 (1) a denial by the Secretary of a petition; 

19 (2) a court decision affirming a denial of a peti20 tion; and 

21 (3) any other denial of a petition. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 4300.72 May I remove my personal property or improvements when the permit expires or terminates? ( a ) Yes. Within 90 days of the expiration or termination of the grazing permit, or within any extension period, you may remove all your personal property and any removable range improvements you own, such as fences, corrals, and buildings.
( b ) Property that is not removed within the time allowed will become property of the United States.
#### § 4.1603 Appeal period.

An appeal may be submitted at any time within 45 calendar days after announcement of an agency decision regarding the method of performance of a commercial or industrial type requirement.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Miami Division 

Case No.: 20-22051-CIV-MARTINEZ-OTAZO-REYES 

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 3G 

LICENSING S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HMD AMERICA, INC. and HMD 

GLOBAL OY, 

Defendants. 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL AND 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT COMPLETE CERTIFICATE OF 

INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to File Under Seal and 

Extension of Time to Submit Complete Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure 

Statement [ECF No. ___], filed September 4, 2020. 

 The Court, having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised in the premises, hereby 

ORDERS and ADJUDGES as follows: 

 Defendants may file under seal an unredacted version of their Certificates of Interested 

Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement within one (1) day of the date of this Order. 

Defendants’ Corporate Disclosure Statement is to remain under seal until further order of the 

Court. 

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Miami, Florida, this __ day of September, 2020. 

 ____________________________________ 

 JOSE E. MARTINEZ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies furnished to: 

Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes, U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Counsel of record 

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 14-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 1 of 1
#### Pocono Forestry Corporation, Respondent, v. Martha C. Price et al., Individually and Doing Business as Staten Island Marine Service, Defendants; Martha C. Price et al., Appellants.

Motion to resettle order or for reargument denied, without costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 812.]
#### § 4.28 Interlocutory appeals.

There shall be no interlocutory appeal from a ruling of an administrative law judge unless permission is first obtained from an Appeals Board and an administrative law judge has certified the interlocutory ruling or abused his discretion in refusing a request to so certify. Permission will not be granted except upon a showing that the ruling complained of involves a controlling question of law and that an immediate appeal therefrom may materially advance the final decision. An interlocutory appeal shall not operate to suspend the hearing unless otherwise ordered by the Board.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone CapitalCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended September 30, 2009 (“Form 10-K”), filedconcurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Dated:  November 23, 2009

 

 
| /s/ DAVID GLADSTONE     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David Gladstone         |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
§ 414.4 Reporting requirements and accounting under Storage and Interstate Release Agreements. ( a ) *Annual report to the Secretary.* Each storing entity will submit an annual report to the Secretary containing the material required by this section. The report will be due on a date to be agreed upon by the parties to the Storage and Interstate Release Agreement. The report must include: ( 1 ) The quantity of water diverted and stored during the prior year under all Storage and Interstate Release Agreements; and
( 2 ) The total quantity of stored water available to support the development of ICUA under each Storage and Interstate Release Agreement to which the storing entity is a party as of December 31 of the prior calendar year.
( b ) *How the Secretary accounts for diverted and stored water.* The Secretary will account for water diverted and stored under Storage and Interstate Release Agreements in the records maintained under Article V of the Decree. ( 1 ) The Secretary will account for the water that is diverted and stored by a storing entity as a consumptive use in the Storing State for the year in which it is stored.
( 2 ) The Secretary will account for the diversion and consumptive use of ICUA by a consuming entity as a consumptive use in the Consuming State of unused apportionment under Article II(B)(6) of the Decree in the year the water is released in the same manner as any other unused apportionment taken by that State.
( 3 ) The Secretary will maintain individual balances of the quantities of water stored under a Storage and Interstate Release Agreement and available to support the development of ICUA. The appropriate balances will be reduced when ICUA is developed by the storing entity and released by the Secretary for use by a consuming entity.
#### § 4170.2-1 Penal provisions under the Taylor Grazing Act.

Under section 2 of the Act any person who willfully commits an act prohibited under § 4140.1(b), or who willfully violates approved special rules and regulations is punishable by a fine of not more than $500.

[60 FR 9969, Feb. 22, 1995]
**Exhibit 32.1**








Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of M45 Mining Resources
      Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrea
      M. Cortellazzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the
              Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects,
              the
                financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







Date:
                November 19, 2007
            
            /s/Andrea
                M. Cortellazzi
              Andrea
                M. Cortellazzi
              Chief
                Executive Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Report onsearch for human radiation experiment records, 1944-1994**
 
SuDoc:D 1.2:R 11/V.1-2
ItemNumber:0306
CGPsystem Number:000475923
 
Volume 1
Volume 2
Volume 3
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendices 3 & 4
#### § 5511.3-5 Removal of improvements.

Upon expiration of the permit period the permittee will be given 90 days to remove equipment, personal property and any improvements he has placed on the land, except roads, culverts and bridges are to be left in place, in good condition and will become the property of the United States upon expiration of the 90-day removal period.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Thomas
Calabro, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of Latin American Telecommunications Venture Company on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended February 28, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Latin American
Telecommunications Venture Company.




By:
                /s/
      Thomas
      CalabroName:
                Thomas
      CalabroTitle:
                Chief
      Financial OfficerApril
      19, 2010