alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 3741.6 Acquisition of Leasing Act minerals in lands covered by mining claims and millsites.

The Leasing Act minerals in lands covered by mining claims and millsites located after the date of the Act or validated pursuant to the Act may be acquired under the mineral leasing laws, upon appropriate application therefor being filed prior to the issuance of patent to such mining claims or millsites, or after the issuance of patent, if the patent contains a reservation of Leasing Act minerals to the United States as provided in section 4 of the Act.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Edgar J. Bernheimer et al., Attorneys at Law, Respondents, for Enforcement of a Lien upon Awards Obtained in a Condemnation Proceeding. 35 Steuben Street Realty Corporation et al., Appellants.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
- Skip to Primary Navigation
      - Skip to Main Content
      - Skip to Footer

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

        -  Water & Power            - Dams
          - Powerplants
          - Projects
          - Agrimet/Hydromet
          - Water Operations 
        -  Resources & Research            - Programs
          - Technical Service Center
          - Research & Development
          - Reclamation Manual
          - Environmental Resources/Reports
          - Library 
        -  About Us            - Mission
          - Fact Sheet
          - Commissioner
          - Addresses/Contacts
          - Organizational Chart
          - Leadership Bios
          - Employment
          - Contact 
        -  Recreation & Public Use            - Find Recreation
          - Recreation.gov
          - Public Use 
        -  News & Multimedia            - News Releases
          - News Stories
          - Speeches
          - Congressional Testimony
          - Fact Sheets
          - Photos
          - Multimedia
          - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

              - Reclamation
              - California-Great Basin
              - CVP
              - CVP Financial Information

Region 10                - Region 10 Home
                - About Us
                - Area Offices
                - Central Valley Project (CVP)                    - About the CVP
                  - Water Info Links
                  - Ratesetting
                  - Projects/Activities
                  - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation                         of the CVP and SWP
                  - Laws/Regs/Links
                  - Financial Information 
                  - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                  - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
                - Programs & Activities
                - Projects & Facilities
                - Doing Business with Reclamation
                - Public Affairs
                - Employment
                - Recreation
                - Site Index
                - Contact Us

## Financial Information

            - Annual Ratebooks
            - Financial Statements
            - Ratesetting Process
            - Restoration Fund Charges
            - Water Contractor Notices

Forms
            - Payment Recap Form  (Excel - 20 KB) 
            - Payment Recap Form  (PDF - 43KB) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Last Updated: 8/3/20*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

            - Contact Us
            - Site Index
            - Accessibility
            - Disclaimer
            - DOI
            - FOIA
            - No Fear Act
            - Notices
            - Privacy Policy
            - Quality of Information
            - Recreation.gov
            - USA.gov
### §7301. Property subject to tax

#### (a) Taxable articles

Any property on which, or for or in respect whereof, any tax is imposed by this title which shall be found in the possession or custody or within the control of any person, for the purpose of being sold or removed by him in fraud of the internal revenue laws, or with design to avoid payment of such tax, or which is removed, deposited, or concealed, with intent to defraud the United States of such tax or any part thereof, may be seized, and shall be forfeited to the United States.

#### (b) Raw materials

All property found in the possession of any person intending to manufacture the same into property of a kind subject to tax for the purpose of selling such taxable property in fraud of the internal revenue laws, or with design to evade the payment of such tax, may also be seized, and shall be forfeited to the United States.

#### (c) Equipment

All property whatsoever, in the place or building, or any yard or enclosure, where the property described in subsection (a) or (b) is found, or which is intended to be used in the making of property described in subsection (a), with intent to defraud the United States of tax or any part thereof, on the property described in subsection (a) may also be seized, and shall be forfeited to the United States.

#### (d) Packages

All property used as a container for, or which shall have contained, property described in subsection (a) or (b) may also be seized, and shall be forfeited to the United States.

#### (e) Conveyances

Any property (including aircraft, vehicles, vessels, or draft animals) used to transport or for the deposit or concealment of property described in subsection (a) or (b), or any property used to transport or for the deposit or concealment of property which is intended to be used in the making or packaging of property described in subsection (a), may also be seized, and shall be forfeited to the United States.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 867; Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §204(8), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1429.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1958—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 85–859 included property used to transport or for the deposit or concealment of property which is intended to be used in the making or packaging of property described in subsec. (a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1958 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 85–859 effective Sept. 3, 1958, see section 210(a)(1) of Pub. L. 85–859, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5001 of this title.
#### § 426.26 Severability.

If any provision of these regulations or the application of these rules to any person or circumstance is held invalid, then the sections of these rules or their applications which are not held invalid will not be affected.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T35N

T34N

T33N

T32N

T31N

T30N

T29N

T28N

T27N

T26N

T25N

R114W R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

T36N

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

Oil and Gas

Management Areas

Map 2-9

Alternative 4

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Intensively Developed Fields

1/2 mile NSO buffer

Traditional Leasing Areas

Unavailable Areas

Leased Federal Minerals
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Ramesh C. Trivedi, Chief Executive Officer and President of Integrated
Surgical Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 8, 2003                    /s/ Ramesh C. Trivedi
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Ramesh C. Trivedi
                                         Chief Executive Officer and President



                                      -20-
Index of Non

‐ CBI Pre

‐ Rule Communication with Companies
1.) Nov. 5, 2010 – Email from Staci Gatica, EP A, to Bob Kamins, Altair Partners, LP, about timing of 2011 letter to a llowance holders indicating company

‐ specific calendar

‐ year allowances 2.) Nov. 9, 2010 – Email from Andy Stolarz, Honeywell, to Staci Gatica, EPA, about timing of 2011 letter to allowance holders indicating company

‐ specific calendar

‐ year allowances 3.) Nov. 29, 2010 – Email from Roger Patric k, Mayer Brown LLP, to Diane McConkey, EPA, about timing of 2011 letter to allowance holders indicating company ‐ specific calendar

‐ year allowances 4.) Dec. 29, 2010 – Email from Staci Gati ca, EPA, to Jose Armas, Refricenter International, about timing of 2011 letter to allowance holders indicating company ‐ specific calendar

‐ year allowances 5.) Jan. 10, 2011 – Internal EPA email from Luke Hall

‐ Jordan in preparation for Jan. 11, 2011 Alliance Meeting Q&A Session with Drusilla Hufford, EPA 6.) Jan. 27, 2011 – Correspondence from Jame s Tieken, ICOR International Inc., to Gina McCarthy, Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. EPA dated January 27, 2011 7.) Feb. 4, 2011 – Correspondence from W illiam J. Hamel, Arkema Inc., to Drusilla Hufford, EPA, via electronic and overnight mail 8.) March 7, 2011 – Email from Don Magid, Solvay Fluorides, LLC, to Drusilla Hufford, EPA 9.) June 2, 2011 – Correspondence from Davi d Doniger, Natural Resources Defense Council, to Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, EPA, and Administrator Cass R. Sunstein, OIRA, OMB 10.) List of entities meeting with EPA to di scuss the HCFC Phaseout between January 21, 2011 (the date EPA’s petition for rehearing was denied) and June 6, 2011
#### § 4300.2 Is there a special form for my application?

All applications you submit to BLM must be on a BLM-approved form and in duplicate. The forms to be used in this part are the Grazing Lease or Permit Application (Form 4201-1), the Reindeer Grazing Permit (Form 4132-2), and the Range Improvement Permit (Form 4120-7).
#### § 3809.505 How do the financial guarantee requirements of this subpart apply to my existing plan of operations?

For each plan of operations approved before January 20, 2001, for which you or your predecessor in interest posted a financial guarantee under the regulations in force before that date, you must post a financial guarantee according to the requirements of this subpart no later than November 20, 2001, at the local BLM office with jurisdiction over the lands involved. You do not need to post a new financial guarantee if your existing financial guarantee satisfies this subpart. If you are conducting operations under a plan of operations approved before January 20, 2001, but you have not provided a financial guarantee, you must post a financial guarantee under § 3809.551 by September 13, 2001.

[66 FR 32575, June 15, 2001]
#### § 4160.2 Protests.

Any applicant, permittee, lessee or other interested public may protest the proposed decision under § 4160.1 of this title in person or in writing to the authorized officer within 15 days after receipt of such decision.

[47 FR 41713, Sept. 21, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 6455, Feb. 21, 1984; 61 FR 4227, Feb. 5, 1996]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10702

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARIO FLORES-JAIME, also known as Robert Mendoza-Rosales,

also known as Joe Garcia-Perez, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:06-CR-3

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario FloresJaime raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed February 16, 2017 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00560-CV

____________

EDMOND C. MUNOZ AND HOUSTON-HARRIS DIVISION PATROL, 

INC., Appellants

V.

SECURE1ONE SECURITY & INVESTIGATION, INC., AND TEXAS1ONE 

PROTECTION SERVICES, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-18912

ABATEMENT ORDER

On February 10, 2017, the parties filed a joint motion to abate this appeal 

pending completion of a settlement agreement. The motion is granted. Accordingly, 

we issue the following order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket until March 21, 2017. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s 
active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or 

other dispositive motion. The court also will consider an appropriate motion to 

reinstate the appeal filed by any party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its 

own motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Wise.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraLink Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Ernest J. Sampias, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the bestof my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodspresented therein.
| /s/ ERNEST J. SAMPIAS                                                                |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ernest J.  Sampias                                                                   |
| Executive Vice  President of   Finance and Administration,   Chief Financial Officer |
| November 9, 2006                                                                     |

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to SpectraLink Corporation and will beretained by SpectraLink Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompaniesthis report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, isnot deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of SpectraLink Corporation under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether madebefore or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

----
#### Herman Minzesheimer, Respondent, v. Samuel Treeger, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60666-60667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22792]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employee Benefits Security Administration


Working Group on Fees and Related Disclosure to Participants, 
Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public teleconference meeting will be held on Wednesday, October 27, 
2004, of the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit 
Plans Working Group assigned to study fee and related disclosures to 
plan participants.
    The session will take place in Room N5677, U.S. Department of 
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. The purpose 
of the open meeting, which will run from 1 p.m. to approximately 4 
p.m., is for Working Group members to discuss and conclude their 
report/recommendations for the Secretary of Labor.
    Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written 
statement pertaining to the topic may do so by submitting 20 copies to 
Larry Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Room N-5656, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. 
Statements received on or before October 20, 2004 will be included in 
the record of the meeting. Individuals or representatives of 
organizations wishing to address the Working Group should

[[Page 60667]]

forward their request to the Executive Secretary at the above address 
or via telephone at (202) 693-8668. Oral presentations will be limited 
to 20 minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for the 
record. Individuals with disabilities who need special accommodations 
should contact Larry Good by October 20 at the address indicated in 
this notice.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 5th day of October, 2004
Ann L. Combs,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-22792 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 7117

JOSEPH H. GIBBS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. ( 2:21

- cv - 03206

- JD )

Submitted : March 28, 2024 Decided: April 2, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Joseph Hugo Gibbs , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7117 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Joseph H. Gibbs , a South Carolina prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court ’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation , construing Gibbs’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition , and dismissing the petition as successive and
unauthorized

. Gibbs also seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying reconsideration.
The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is deba table and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v.
Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gibbs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-7117 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 126

 127

 126

 123

 119

 117

 117

 116

 114

 120

 118

 117

 112

 111

 113

 111

 107

 107

 103

 105

 104

 105

 106

 109

 111

 112

 111

 112

 114

 122

 123

 123

 121

 120

 117

 115

 113

 113

 110

 110

 113

 116

 110

 107

 108

 108

 104

 102

 101

 99

 101

 101

 102

 102

 105

 108

 107

 107

 107

 110

 112

 119

 124

 124

 123

 119

 117

 115

 114

 112

 112

 116

 117

 113

 109

 110

 110

 107

 104

 103

 101

 103

 103

 103

 104

 106

 109

 108

 109

 109

 111

 118

 120

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
§ 426.21 Interest on underpayments. ( a ) *Definition of underpayment.* For the purposes of this section *underpayment* means the difference between what a landholder owed for the delivery of irrigation water under Federal reclamation law and what that landholder paid.
( b ) *Collection of interest on underpayments.* If a landholder has incurred an underpayment, Reclamation will collect from the appropriate district such underpayment with interest. Interest accrues from the original payment due date until the district pays the amount due. The original payment due date is the date the district should have paid the United States for water delivered to the landholder.
( c ) *Underpayment interest rate.* The Secretary of the Treasury determines the interest rate charged the district based on the weighted average yield of all interest-bearing marketable issues sold by the Department of the Treasury during the period of underpayment.