alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5211. Production and entry of distilled spirits

Distilled spirits in the process of production in a distilled spirits plant may be held prior to the production gauge only for so long as is reasonably necessary to complete the process of production. Under such regulations as the Secretary shall prescribe, all distilled spirits produced in a distilled spirits plant shall be gauged and a record made of such gauge within a reasonable time after the production thereof has been completed. The proprietor shall, pursuant to such production gauge and in accordance with such regulations as the Secretary shall prescribe, make appropriate entry for—

(1) deposit of such spirits on bonded premises for storage or processing;

(2) withdrawal upon determination of tax as authorized by law;

(3) withdrawal under the provisions of section 5214; and

(4) transfer for redistillation under the provisions of section 5223.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1362; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(a)(26), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 284.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5211, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 638, related to detention of casks, packages, or containers on suspicion, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859. See section 5311 of this title.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior sections 5193(a), 5194(a), (e) to (g), 5242(a), 5305, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 633 to 636, 645, 657, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1979—Pars. (1), (5). Pub. L. 96–39 substituted in par. (1) "on bonded premises for storage or processing" for "in storage on bonded premises" and struck out par. (5) which related to an appropriate entry by the proprietor for immediate denaturation.

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 810 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1959, see section 210(a)(1) of Pub. L. 85–859, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
#### § 4.421 Definitions.

In addition to the definitions in § 4.400, as used in this subpart:

*Director* means the Director of BLM or a BLM Deputy Director or Assistant Director.

*Manager* means the BLM official with direct jurisdiction over the public lands that are pertinent to the decision or contest.

*Person named in the decision* means any of the following persons identified in a final BLM grazing decision: An affected applicant, permittee, lessee, or agent or lienholder of record, or an interested public as defined in § 4100.0-5 of this title.

*State Director* means the supervising BLM officer for the State in which a particular range lies, or an authorized representative.

[75 FR 64667, Oct. 20, 2010]
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Callisto
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
New York, New York

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-128254, 333-123863,
333-115471, 333-139971 and 333-145989) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-119648 and 333-130716) of Callisto
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries (a development stage company) of our report dated March 25, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appear in this
Form 10-K. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

|/s/ BDO Seidman, LLPNew York, New York
March 25, 2008 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
----

| 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date Dated: May 16, 2011 | /s/    | Gary A. Schuman         |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Name Gary A. Schuman    |   |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 3, 2017

No. 04-17-00368-CR

Preston Dewayne VANNOY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No 2, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. CCL-15-0780

Honorable Brenda Chapman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to December 4, 2017.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: __________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Christopher M. Eaton

Assistant County Attorney

211 W. Court Street, 3rd Floor

Seguin, TX 78155

Susan Lee Schoon

Schoon Law Firm, P.C.

200 N. Seguin Avenue

New Braunfels, TX 78130-4456
ATTENTION 

Sheep Grazing in This Area

Livestock Protection Dogs in Use

Sheep operators use dogs to manage and protect their sheep by scaring off predators. The dogs are here to protect the sheep. If 

you do not appear to be a threat to the sheep, many times the dogs will just watch you.

FROM: TO:

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. United States Department of Agriculture • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service • Program Aid No. 2053 • Issued July 2010

USDA/APHIS

Please Avoid Conflict With Protection Dogs. Do:

4 Stop and dismount if mountain biking.

4 Put your bike between you and the dog.

4 Walk your bike until you are well past the sheep.

4 Keep your distance from the flock. 

4 Keep your dog(s) leashed at all times. 

4 Watch for the protection dog(s) and the herder.

4 Remain calm and quiet if a dog(s) approaches.

Don’t:

4 Hike or ride your all-terrain vehicle/mountain bike into or near the flock.

4 Make quick or aggressive movements around the dog(s) or sheep.

4 Attempt to hit or throw things at the dog(s) or sheep.

4 Yell at dog(s) or sheep, unless approached—then, yell “go back” or “no!”

4 Try to outrun the dog(s).

If you have questions about livestock protection dogs or other wildlife damage management issues, please call Wildlife 

Services—a program within the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

(APHIS)—at 1-866-4-USDA-WS (1-866-487-3297), or visit the APHIS Web site at www.aphis.usda.gov/wildlife_damage.
§ 4.354 Reconsideration or rehearing. ( a ) Any party aggrieved by the final order of the administrative judge may, within thirty (30) days after the date of mailing such decision, file with the administrative judge a written petition for reconsideration and/or rehearing. Such petition must be under oath and must state specifically and concisely the grounds upon which it is based. If it is based upon newly discovered evidence, it shall be accompanied by affidavits of witnesses stating fully what the new evidence or testimony is to be. It shall also state justifiable reasons for the prior failure to discover and present the evidence.
( b ) If proper grounds are not shown, or if the petition is not filed within the time prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section, the administrative judge shall issue an order denying the petition and shall set forth therein the reasons therefor. The administrative judge shall serve copies of such order on all parties in interest.
( c ) If the petition appears to show merit, or if the administrative judge becomes aware of sufficient additional evidence to justify correction of error even without the filing of a petition, or upon remand from the Board following an appeal resulting in vacating the final order, the administrative judge shall cause copies of the petition, supporting papers, and other data, or in the event of no petition an order to show cause or decision of the Board vacating the final order in appropriate cases, to be served on all parties in interest. The parties in interest will be allowed a reasonable, specified time within which to submit answers or legal briefs in opposition to the petition or order to show cause or Board decision. The administrative judge shall then reconsider, with or without hearing, the issues of fact and shall issue a final order upon reconsideration, affirming, modifying, or vacating the original final order and making such further orders as are deemed warranted. The final order upon reconsideration shall be served on all parties in interest and shall become final thirty (30) days from the date on which it is mailed.
( d ) Successive petitions for reconsideration and/or rehearing shall not be permitted. Nothing herein shall be considered as a bar to the remand of a case by the Board for further reconsideration, hearing, or rehearing after appeal.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 784

 768

 796

 810

 780

 869

 874

 923

 954

 975

 970

 952

 950

 976

 988

 997

 996

 935

 904

 908

 918

 909

 908

 942

 972

 995

 1,009

 991

 964

 771

 750

 751

 770

 744

 785

 870

 876

 926

 955

 954

 940

 936

 948

 969

 972

 935

 885

 843

 879

 906

 899

 902

 909

 907

 964

 996

 940

 926

 781

 758

 768

 798

 756

 836

 873

 892

 944

 967

 967

 946

 944

 965

 982

 987

 969

 912

 864

 897

 912

 904

 905

 922

 964

 978

 1,002

 966

 938

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 16,046

 16,185

 16,316

 16,471

 16,608

 16,925

 17,398

 17,925

 18,362

 18,903

 19,433

 19,900

 20,272

 20,622

 20,984

 21,351

 21,719

 22,143

 22,630

 23,186

 23,712

 24,283

 24,783

 25,211

 25,630

 26,121

 26,559

 26,860

 27,066

 535

 540

 544

 549

 554

 564

 580

 598

 612

 630

 648

 663

 676

 687

 699

 712

 724

 738

 754

 773

 790

 809

 826

 840

 854

 871

 885

 895

 902

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit 13



HOLMES FINANCING (NO.4) PLC

04167953



ABBEY NATIONAL HOUSE

2 TRITON SQUARE, REGENTS PLACE

LONDON NW1 3AN



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of the servicer does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 20-F) of Holmes Financing (No. 4) PLC (the
Company) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                
|-------------------- |  | ---------------
|Dated: June 30, 2004 |  | /s/ David Green
|                     |  | David Green    
|                     |  | Director       



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### SAWYER & CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. The ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO., Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 67-426.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

April 17, 1968.

Frank Infelise, Lynn, Mass., for plaintiff.

John A. Briggs, Law Dept., Boston, Mass., for defendant.

OPINION

CAFFREY, District Judge.

This matter came before the Court upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The following appears from the pleadings and the affidavits appended to the motion for summary judgment:

1. This action was brought pursuant to the provisions of 49 U.S.C.A. sec. 20 (11) for the recovery by plaintiff of $1,500, the amount of damages it allegedly suffered in the transportation by rail of a quantity of cantaloupes from California to Massachusetts.

2. 49 U.S.C.A. sec. 20(11) imposes liability only on the initial carrier receiving the property from the consignor or on the final carrier delivering the property to the consignee, and it imposes that liability only in favor of the lawful holder of the bill of lading or receipt for the merchandise.

8. Plaintiff’s complaint does not contain any allegation that it was or is the holder of a bill of lading or a receipt for the merchandise shipped.

4. The receiving carrier who issued the original bill of lading for this merchandise was the Sunset Railway, a line-haul carrier, which is not a switching carrier.

5. The defendant was neither the initial receiving nor the final delivering carrier.

The motion for summary judgment must be allowed because on this record it does not appear that two of the requirements of 49 U.S.C.A. 20(11) have been satisfied, in that plaintiff is not alleged or shown to be the holder of a bill of lading and defendant has affirmatively shown, by uncontradieted affidavits, that it was neither the initial receiving nor the final delivering carrier.

Judgment for the defendant.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

MARISELA CIUCIO, Appellant,

v. U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., as Trustee for LSF10 Master Participation Trust; ANTHONY CIUCIO a/k/a ANTHONY O. CIUCIO a/k/a ANTHONY OSCAR CIUCIO; UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF ANTHONY CIUCIO; UNIFY AMERICAN SERVICES CORP., as Trustee under that certain Florida land trust dated November 23, 2012 and numbered M86-1214; UNKNOWN TENANT #1; UNKNOWN TENANT #2; and ANY AND ALL UNKNOWN PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER, AND AGAINST THE HEREIN NAMED INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT(S) WHO ARE NOT KNOWN TO BE DEAD OR ALIVE, WHETHER SAID UNKNOWN PARTIES MAY CLAIM AN INTEREST AS SPOUSES, HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES, OR OTHER CLAIMANTS, Appellees.
No. 2D22-2311
November 15, 2023 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Melissa M. Polo, Judge. Marisela Ciucio, pro se. Zachary Ullman, Matthew Ciccio, and Julia Poletti of Aldridge Pite, LLP, Delray Beach, for Appellee U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.

### 2

No appearance for remaining Appellees.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SLEET, C.J., and CASANUEVA and BLACK, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### § 4.450 Private contests and protests.
### Subpart F—Miscellaneous

Sec.
681.
Limitation on charitable deduction.
[682.
Repealed.]
683.
Use of trust as an exchange fund.
684.
Recognition of gain on certain transfers to certain foreign trusts and estates.
685.
Treatment of funeral trusts.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §11051(b)(1)(C), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2089, struck out item 682 "Income of an estate or trust in case of divorce, etc."

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–312, title III, §301(a), Dec. 17, 2010, 124 Stat. 3300, amended analysis to read as if amendment by Pub. L. 107–16, §542(e)(1)(D), had never been enacted. See 2001 Amendment note below.

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–16, title V, §542(e)(1)(D), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 85, inserted "and nonresident aliens" after "estates" in item 684.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title XI, §1131(c)(6), title XIII, §1309(b), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 980, 1043, added items 684 and 685.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XXI, §2131(e)(2), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1924, substituted "Use of trust as an exchange fund" for "Applicability of provisions" in item 683.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 60286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2004-18609; Airspace Docket No. 03-AWP-15]


Establishment of Class E Airspace; California City, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule, which establishes Class E airspace at California City, CA.

DATES: 0901 UTC, November 25, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra Trindle, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, AWP-520, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 1500 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale, California 
90261, telephone (310) 725-6613.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on August 11, 2004, 
(69 FR 487666). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for 
a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on November 25, 2004. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this action confirms that this direct final rule 
will be effective on that date.

    Issued in Los Angeles, California, September 23, 2004.
John Clancy
Area Director, Western Terminal Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-22611 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 4.1022 How are prehearing conferences conducted? ( a ) *Initial prehearing conference.* The ALJ will conduct an initial prehearing conference with the parties at the time specified in the docketing notice under § 4.1020, within 55 days after issuance of the docketing notice. ( 1 ) The initial prehearing conference will be used: ( i ) To identify, narrow, and clarify the disputed issues of material fact and exclude issues that do not qualify for review as factual, material, and disputed;
( ii ) To discuss the evidence on which each party intends to rely at the hearing; and
( iii ) To set the date, time, and place of the hearing.
( 2 ) The initial prehearing conference may also be used: ( i ) To discuss limiting and grouping witnesses to avoid duplication;
( ii ) To discuss stipulations of fact and of the content and authenticity of documents;
( iii ) To consider requests that the ALJ take official notice of public records or other matters;
( iv ) To discuss pending or anticipated motions, if any; and
( v ) To consider any other matters that may aid in the disposition of the case.
( b ) *Other conferences.* The ALJ may direct the parties to attend one or more other prehearing conferences, if consistent with the need to complete the hearing process within 180 days. Any party may by motion request a conference.
( c ) *Notice.* The ALJ must give the parties reasonable notice of the time and place of any conference.
( d ) *Method.* A conference will ordinarily be held by telephone, unless the ALJ orders otherwise.
( e ) *Representatives' preparation and authority.* Each party's representative must be fully prepared during the prehearing conference for a discussion of all procedural and substantive issues properly raised. The representative must be authorized to commit the party that he or she represents respecting those issues.
( f ) *Parties' meeting.* Before the initial prehearing conference, the parties' representatives must make a good faith effort: ( 1 ) To meet in person, by telephone, or by other appropriate means; and
( 2 ) To reach agreement on the schedule of remaining steps in the hearing process.
( g ) *Failure to attend.* Unless the ALJ orders otherwise, a party that fails to attend or participate in a conference, after being served with reasonable notice of its time and place, waives all objections to any agreements reached in the conference and to any consequent orders or rulings.
( h ) *Scope.* During a conference, the ALJ may dispose of any procedural matters related to the case.
( i ) *Order.* Within 3 days after the conclusion of each conference, the ALJ must issue an order that recites any agreements reached at the conference and any rulings made by the ALJ during or as a result of the conference.
20-mj-02766-Louis

Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 1 of 16
Attested to by the applicant via FaceTime

original

20-mj-02766-Louis

Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 15 of 16
14

Case 1:20-mj-02766-LFL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 16 of 16
#### In the Matter of the Will of Evan J. Rustin, Deceased. Jerome Rustin, Appellant; Lawyers Trust Company, as Executor and Trustee, et al., Respondents.

Ho opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ.
§ 3506.14 May others participate in the exploration program? ( a ) If any person wants to participate in the exploration program, you and BLM must receive written notice from that person within 30 days after the later of the final newspaper publication or the end of the BLM 30-day posting period.
( b ) A person who wants to participate in the exploration program must state in their notice: ( 1 ) They are willing to share in the cost of the exploration on a pro-rata basis; and
( 2 ) Any modifications to the exploration program that BLM should consider.
[64 FR 53536, Oct. 1, 1999; 65 FR 11476, Mar. 3, 2000]