alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 404.4 What are the goals of the program? The goals of the program are to: ( a ) Assess and address urgent and compelling rural water supply needs that are not currently met by other programs;
( b ) Promote and apply a regional or watershed perspective to water resources management in planning rural water supply projects;
( c ) Develop solutions to address rural water supply needs that are cost-effective, and that generate national net economic benefits as required under the “Economic Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources” (Principles and Guidelines). The Principles and Guidelines, published in 1983 by the Water Resources Council pursuant to the Water Resources Planning Act of 1965 (Pub. L. 89-80) as amended, is incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. The Principles and Guidelines are intended to ensure proper and consistent planning by Federal agencies in the formulation and evaluation of water and related land resources implementation studies. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the material must be available to the public and approved by the Director of the Federal Register. All approved material is available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* Also, a copy of this publication may be obtained and inspected at: Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Federal Center, Building 67, Denver, CO 80225, Policy and Program Services, 303-445-2906 where copies are on file, or at the following website: *http://intra.gp.usbr.gov/resource_services/planning_process/principles_guidelines.pdf .*
( d ) Encourage partnerships among rural communities, Indian tribes or tribal organizations, states or political subdivisions of a state, water districts and associations, and other eligible entities, to address rural water supply issues; and
( e ) Complement other existing programs and authorities that address rural water supply issues, and encourage collaboration between programs where appropriate.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-1966

_____________________________

E.L.J., Father of A.J. and B.J.,

Each A Minor Child,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND 

FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

David Gooding, Judge.

October 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 769 (1982)

(holding that the clear and convincing evidence standard may be 

used to terminate parental rights as the standard “adequately 

conveys to the factfinder the level of subjective certainty about [its]

factual conclusions necessary to satisfy due process”).

B.L. THOMAS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, Orlando, for Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Department of Children and Families, 

Jacksonville, Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals 

and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, 

Guardian ad Litem Program, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# Euroopa Liidu C 232A/21.

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 232A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 48. köide21. september 2005 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 232A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

48. köide21. september 2005

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Teatised |
| | Komisjon |
| 2005/C 232A/1 | Teade Ühenduse Kalanduskontrolli Agentuuri tegevdirektori ametikoha täitmise kohta (palgaaste A*14) — KOM/2005/10004 | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

III   Teatised

Komisjon

2005/C 232A/1

Teade Ühenduse Kalanduskontrolli Agentuuri tegevdirektori ametikoha täitmise kohta (palgaaste A*14) — KOM/2005/10004

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

III Teatised

Komisjon

| 21.9.2005 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2005

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 232/1

---

TEADE ÜHENDUSE KALANDUSKONTROLLI AGENTUURI TEGEVDIREKTORI AMETIKOHA TÄITMISE KOHTA

(palgaaste A*14)

KOM/2005/10004

(2005/C 232 A/01)

Ühenduse Kalanduskontrolli Agentuur soovib nimetada ametisse direktori.

Kandidaatidel peab olema ühe Euroopa Liidu liikmesriigi kodakondsus.

Direktori nimetab komisjoni esitatud kandidaatide loetelu põhjal ametisse haldusnõukogu. Ta nimetatakse ametisse ajutise töötajana palgaastmega A*14 vastavalt Euroopa ühenduste muude teenistujate teenistustingimuste artiklile 2a viieks aastaks, mida võidakse pikendada veel kuni viieks aastaks. Agentuur ja komisjon järgivad võrdsete võimaluste poliitikat.

Ametijuhendi, taotluse vormi ja eeskirjad taotluse saatmiseks leiate veebilehtedelt:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

või

http://europa.eu.int/comm/fisheries

Avalduste esitamise tähtaeg on 21. oktoober 2005 (ärasaatmise kuupäeva tõendab postitempel).

---
#### § 3283.9 When is a change of unit operator effective?

The change is effective when BLM approves the new unit operator in writing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 737

 678

 701

 739

 755

 724

 797

 658

 720

 721

 645

 618

 595

 600

 629

 640

 608

 574

 503

 492

 460

 450

 424

 435

 408

 374

 372

 352

 351

 360

 356

 600

 584

 565

 539

 526

 514

 504

 495

 485

 479

 404

 424

 351

 470

 457

 450

 431

 413

 394

 377

 363

 356

 347

 343

 331

 326

 323

 322

 324

 329

 324

 632

 611

 596

 591

 582

 561

 564

 543

 540

 538

 501

 488

 478

 502

 495

 486

 468

 449

 425

 404

 388

 376

 370

 362

 357

 344

 337

 331

 333

 338

 339

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
§ 3931.70 Production maps and production reports. ( a ) Report production of all oil shale products or by-products to the BLM on a quarterly basis no later than 30 calendar days after the end of the reporting period.
( b ) Report all production and royalty information to the MMS under 30 CFR parts 210 and 216.
( c ) Submit production maps to the proper BLM office no later than 30 calendar days after the end of each royalty reporting period or on a schedule determined by the BLM. Show all excavations in each separate bed or deposit on the maps so that the production of minerals for any period can be accurately ascertained. Production maps must also show surface boundaries, lease boundaries, topography, and subsidence resulting from mining activities.
( d ) If the lessee or operator does not provide the BLM the maps required by this section, the BLM will employ a licensed mine surveyor to make a survey and maps of the mine, and the cost will be charged to the operator or lessee.
( e ) If the BLM believes any map submitted by an operator or lessee is incorrect, the BLM may have a survey performed, and if the survey shows the map submitted by the operator or lessee to be substantially incorrect in whole or in part, the cost of performing the survey and preparing the map will be charged to the operator or lessee.
( f ) For in situ development operations, the lessee or operator must submit a map showing all surface installations, including pipelines, meter locations, or other points of measurement necessary for production verification as part of the POD. All maps must be modified as necessary for adequate representation of existing operations.
( g ) Within 30 calendar days after well completion, the lessee or operator must submit to the proper BLM office 2 copies of a completed Form 3160-4, Well Completion or Recompletion Report and Log, limited to information that is applicable to oil shale operations. Well logs may be submitted electronically using a BLM-approved electronic format. Describe surface and bottom-hole locations in latitude and longitude.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAerodynamic Performance of a 0.27-Scale Model of an AH-64 Helicopter with Baseline and Alternate Rotor Blade SetsPerformance of a 27 percent scale model rotor designed for the AH-64 helicopter (alternate rotor) was measured in hover and forward flight and compared against and AH-64 baseline rotor model. Thrust, rotor tip Mach number, advance ratio, and ground proximity were varied. In hover, at a nominal thrust coefficient of 0.0064, the power savings was about 6.4 percent for the alternate rotor compared to the baseline. The corresponding thrust increase at this condition was approx. 4.5 percent which represents an equivalent full scale increase in lift capability of about 660 lbs. Comparable results were noted in forward flight except for the high thrust, high speed cases investigated where the baseline rotor was slightly superior. Reduced performance at the higher thrusts and speeds was likely due to Reynolds number effects and blade elasticity differences.Document ID19900014921Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKelley, Henry L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberAVSCOM-TM-90-B-015L-16725NASA-TM-4201AD-A224493NAS 1.15:4201Accession Number90N24237Funding Number(s)PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-62211-AH-7-AAPROJECT: RTOP 505-61-51-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014921.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 427.1 Water conservation. ( a ) *In general.* The Secretary shall encourage the full consideration and incorporation of prudent and responsible water conservation measures in all districts and for the operations by non-Federal recipients of irrigation and municipal and industrial (M&I) water from Federal Reclamation projects.
( b ) *Development of a plan.* Districts that have entered into repayment contracts or water service contracts according to Federal reclamation law or the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended (43 U.S.C. 390b), shall develop and submit to the Bureau of Reclamation a water conservation plan which contains definite objectives which are economically feasible and a time schedule for meeting those objectives. In the event the contractor also has provisions for the supply of M&I water under the authority of the Water Supply Act of 1958 or has invoked a provision of that act, the water conservation plan shall address both the irrigation and M&I water supply activities.
( c ) *Federal assistance.* The Bureau of Reclamation will cooperate with the district, to the extent possible, in studies to identify opportunities to augment, utilize, or conserve the available water supply.
### §607. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 9, 1946, ch. 933, §7, 60 Stat. 969; Pub. L. 91–627, §1, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1874, which related to divestment of inheritance of non-members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 4.1050 What are the requirements for post-hearing briefs? ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Each party may file a post-hearing brief within 20 days after the close of the hearing, unless the ALJ sets a different deadline.
( 2 ) A party may file a reply brief only if requested by the ALJ. The deadline for filing a reply brief, if any, will be set by the ALJ.
( 3 ) The ALJ may limit the length of the briefs to be filed under this section.
( b ) *Content.* ( 1 ) An initial brief must include: ( i ) A concise statement of the case;
( ii ) A separate section containing proposed findings regarding the issues of material fact, with supporting citations to the hearing record;
( iii ) Arguments in support of the party's position; and
( iv ) Any other matter required by the ALJ.
( 2 ) A reply brief, if requested by the ALJ, must be limited to any issues identified by the ALJ.
( c ) *Form.* ( 1 ) An exhibit admitted into evidence or marked for identification in the record may not be reproduced in the brief. ( i ) Such an exhibit may be reproduced, within reasonable limits, in an appendix to the brief.
( ii ) Any pertinent analysis of an exhibit may be included in a brief.
( 2 ) If a brief exceeds 30 pages, it must contain: ( i ) A table of contents and of points made, with page references; and
( ii ) An alphabetical list of citations to legal authority, with page references.
(No. 883

Claimant awarded $744.18.)

#### Albert Rice, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Inheritance *tax*— when *claimant entitled to refund. Sec. 25.*Where an inheritance tax has been fixed and paid under Sec. 25, Inheritance Tax Law, and afterwards under the provisions of the will claimant becomes entitled to the whole of the estate under the terms of the will, and the county court, upon proper proceedings, enters an order finding claimant entitled to a refund of the tax paid: *Held.*Claimant entitled to an award for the amount of the tax paid.

Peffers & Wing, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

Albert Rice, claimant, presents this claim for refund of inheritance taxes under and by virtue of Sec. 25 of Inher*184itanee Tax laws of Illinois. Mary M. Higgins of this State died testate January 1, 1923, and her will was. duly admitted to probate, the estate administered, settled and executors discharged. The-inheritance taxes were fixed and paid under protest.''

Claimant and Clara Horton were made joint beneficiaries of the residue of the property of decedent, after payment of certain other legacies, and, at death of either, the other to get entire amount as provided by will. Clara Horton died and claimant became entitled to her part so that he is sole, claimant.

Clara Horton was a stranger by blood to deceased — not related to her. The tax was assessed at the highest possible rate under said Sec. 25 in accordance with the provisions in the will.

At the death of said Clara Horton the. claimant became entitled to a refund of the inheritance tax under Sec. 25.

The county court subsequently to the entry of original order fixing the tax, made another order finding complainant entitled to' a refund of the amount so paid. Certified copies of orders of the court and of administration are in evidence and the claim proven by competent evidence and no defense.

It is found by the court that claimant, Albert Rice, is entitled to such refund and the court accordingly awards him the sum of $744.18.
**Exhibit        32 **

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT        TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF **

**THE        UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 **

**OF        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| (1) | The                      Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended                      June                      30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section                      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act                      of 1934, as                      amended; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| (2) | The                      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in                      all material                      respects, the financial condition and results of operations                      of the                      Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| CHIEF                  EXECUTIVE OFFICER                                |   | CHIEF                  FINANCIAL OFFICER                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/                  ALFRED                  R.                  CAMNER |   | /s/                  HUMBERTO                  L.                  LOPEZ |
| Alfred                  R. Camner                                       |   | Humberto                  L. Lopez                                       |
| Dated:                  August 9, 2005                                  |   | Dated:                  August 9, 2005                                   |

----
#### § 4.1275 Final decisions.

The Board may adopt, affirm, modify, set aside, or reverse any finding of fact, conclusion of law, or order of the administrative law judge.
Sacramento

R iver

Subac

Cranmore

Kirkville

Everglade

Boyers Landing

Millers Landing

Poffenbergers

Landing

T13N R1E T13N R2E

T12N R1E T12N R2E

1

8

5

7

2

9

6 4

8 9 7

11

3

13 17

12

16

24

14

36

20

18

29

23

32

25

21

35

19

31

26 30 28

33

3

11 12

10

34

15

27

22

15

22

27

10

34

10 10

SSUUTTTTEERR CCOO

YYOOLL OO CC OO

CCOOLLUUSSAA CCOO

45

Contract No. 14-06-200-2073A-R-1

Exhibit B

Pelger Mutual Water Company

725-202-36

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 1 2

Miles

Contractor's Service Area

District Boundary

Point of Diversion

Date: November 3, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\pelger\pelger.mxd
Exhibit 32.2
------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE
                            LEV PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
                FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I am the Controller of Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form
10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-KSB").

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2005
                                                      /s/ Douglas J. Beck
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      Douglas J. Beck
                                                      Controller
#### Frank A. Thompson, Appellant, v. George W. Baily and Another, as Copartners, etc., Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-22054-DPG

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 

3G LICENSING S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NOETIC, INC. and SUN CUPID 

TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD., 

Defendants.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

PLAINTIFFS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

AND CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Sisvel International 

S.A., 3G Licensing S.A. and Sisvel S.p.A. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) certify the following: 

Sisvel International S.A. declares that it is a wholly owned subsidiary of Fineur 

International S.A. No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. 

3G Licensing S.A. declares that it is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sisvel International S.A. 

No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. 

Sisvel S.p.A. declares that it is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sisvel International S.A. No 

publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. 

In addition, the undersigned certifies that, other than the named parties and Plaintiffs, the 

following listed entity (i) has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party 

to the proceeding, or (ii) has a non-financial interest in that subject matter or in a party that could 

be substantially affected by the outcome of this proceeding: 

 Fineur International S.A. 

Case 1:20-cv-22054-DPG Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

Dated: May 18, 2020 /s/ Jorge Espinosa 

Jorge Espinosa, Esq. 

Florida Bar No: 779032 

jorge.espinosa@gray-robinson.com 

Francesca Russo, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.:174912 

francesca.russo@gray-robinson.com 

Robert R. Jimenez, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 72020 

Robert.jimenez@gray-robinson.com 

GRAY | ROBINSON, P.A. 

333 S.E. 2nd Ave., Suite 300 

Miami, FL 33131 

Tel: 305-416-6880 

Fax: 305-416-6887 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 

3G LICENSING S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A. 

Case 1:20-cv-22054-DPG Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2020 Page 2 of 2
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Religion & Spirituality
§ 3483.2 Termination or cancellation for failure to meet diligent development and maintain continued operation. ( a ) Any Federal coal lease or LMU which has not achieved diligent development shall be terminated by DOI.
( b ) After an LMU has been terminated under the provision of paragraph (a) of this section, any Federal coal lease included in that LMU shall then be subject to the diligent development and continued operation requirements that would have been imposed on that Federal lease by the rules of this part, as if the Federal lease had not been included in the LMU.
( c ) Any Federal coal lease on which continued operation is not maintained shall be subject to cancellation.
( d ) The DOI may cancel any Federal coal lease or LMU which fails to meet the requirement for submission of a resource recovery and protection plan.