April 14, 2009

Ms. Laurel Dygow~ki, 8P-AR

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regiun 8

1595 Wynkoop Street

l1enver, Colorado 80202-1129

RE: Roseburg Forest Products Co.

Regional Haze Section 114 Request

Dear Ms. Dygowski:

Enclosed, plea~e find the completed Request for Tnfoll11ation for our Missoula

Particleboard Facility, located in Missoula, Montana.

As required in the instruction, sections were l.:omplcted for each sanderdust burner

IOl.:aled at Missoula Particleboard. These include the Boiler, Roemrnc Burner, and

Solagen Burner. Additional information was not provided for the GEKA Hot Oil Heater,

the natural gas burners on the six wood particle dryers, the Melamine Burner, or lhe

RTO, hecause none of this equipment bums sanderdust.

If you have any questions regarding the enclosed information, please feel free to contJct

EJlcn Porler at (541) 679-2130.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Cole

Plant Manaa-'er

Enclosure
Attachment A

Roseburg Forest Products

Request fnr Information PurSu~Dt to Section 114 ofthc CAA

P;irt I: General Facility ])ata

1. Name offacility: Roseburg Forest ProductslMissoula Particleboard

2. Complete street address offacility CPhysicallocation);

a. Street Address: Seetien 8, Tovmship+3--Nefth, Hultgc 19 West 3300 Ra ser Rd.

b, City~ Missoula

c. Stnte, MT

d. Zip: 59806

e. County: Mi:mtlle Missoula

3, Facility contact

a. Name (First Name, Last Name): Ellcn Porter

b. Title: Manager J Environmental Affairs

c. Tdephuuenumber: 541-679-2130

d. Fax number: 541-679-2714

e. E-mail: ellenp@rfpco.com

f. Mailing address: PO Box400-7;-Mi.SS(H:l!a,-M-~9W6 1088, Roseburg, DR 9'}470

Part 11: Sander Dust Burner Emission Unit Data (Please complete entire section for each

sander dust bumcr, additional copic-'1 may he ncccssary)

1. Emission l'nit Name: Sander Dust Boiler

a. Type ofBoiler (e.g., spreader stoker, suspemion-fired, fluidized bed): Stoker

b. Make: Babcock & Wilcox

c. Madej; Unknown

d. Model Year: 1969

e. Yell" installed: 1969

f. Expecled equipment life: Unknown

g. Unit Is CUlTcntly Operational (Check One): LX YES LJ NO

lfY011 answered YES above, continue on to h. If you answered NO ilbuve, answer

the following and then continue to next unit:

i. D<:lte of unal operation:

n. Will this unit be opemted in the future (eheekunc)?

i] YES n NO

If you answered YES abuve, indicated possible date of operation t.Uld continue to h:

h. Fuel Data (provide data for each type offuel used)

AI
1. Unit Capacity (MMBtuihr): 55 MMDtuihr

II. Maximum Fuel Consumption Rate (tonslhr): 1.5 tons/hr

)II. Maximum Nalural Gas Firing Rate (MMc£'hr): .035 MMcf/hr

IV. High heating value (Dttv'lb): 8500 Btu/lb

2, Boiler Unit Outlet Information (Complete the follov,rjng exhaust gas parameters for the

indicated boiler. Iftbe boiler shares if common stack with another boiler, plea<;e only

provide exhaust infonnation for the specified boiler).

a. Does this unit sha.re an exhaust ~tack with another unit? (Check One)

rxYES UNO

If you answered YES above, plL:ase indicate which other units or emission sources

share this stack: Roemmc Burner I 6 wood part icle dryers

b. Boiler Outlet Volumetric- FIQW1"atc (acfin): 29,034 acfm

c. Boiler Outlet Temperature (F): 572 F

d. Boiler Outlet Moisture (Q;iJ): 9.9%

e. Stack Heighi (ft): 67 ft

f. Stack Diameter (ft): 2.5 f t

g. M!lximum Gross Heat Input (h1MBtuIhr): S5 MMBtu/hr

h. Hours of Operation: 8760 hrs

1. Design Perceut Load: Unknown

J. Average Uncontrolled PM Emissions (lblhr): Unknown

k. Average Uncontrolled PMI~ Emissions (lb/hr): Unknown

1. Average Uncontrolled NOx Emissions (lb/hr): 33.35 lb/hr

Ill. Average Uncontrolled SOl Emissions (lbJ11l'): Unknown

3. Existing Pollution Control Equipment (Complete the following for each picce of control

equipment, make additional copies to provide infonnation for all equipment).

a. PM Control Technology Information

I. Typc of PM Control Technology: Mul ticlones

ll. MakelModel of PM Control Technology: Babcock & w.i lcox I Unknown Model

Ill. Year ingtalled: 1969

IV. Installed Cost ofControl De....i.ce ($): Unknown

v. Annual Operating CoM ofConlro1 Deviee ($/yr): Minimal

vi. ExpeL:led life of equipment: Unknown

VII. Relevant sizing information (for example, if the control device is an ESP,

provide munber of fi;;:lds, collector plate area, etc.): Unknown

\'111. Design control efficiency (%): Unknown

ix. Average Contrlllled PM Emissions (lb/hr): 8.4 lb/hr

x. Average Controlled PM10 Emissions (lbim): 9.042 Ib/hr

b. NOx Control Technology Infonnation: No Equipment

A·'
I. Type of NOx Control Technology: No Equipment

11. MakefModel ofNOx Control Technology: N/A

iii. Yem installed: N/A

iv. Installed Cost of Control Device ($); N / A

v. Annual Operating Cost of Control Device ($/yr); N/A

vi. Expected life of equipment: N/ A

vii. Relevant sizing information (tor example, ifthe control device is an NCSR,

provide catalyst volwne, system capacity, etc.): N/A

viii. Design control efficiency (%): N/ A

lX. Average Controllcd NOx Emissions (lb/hr): N!A

c. S02 Control Tel~hIlology Information

i. Type ofS02 Control Technology: No Equipment

iL Makel1vlodcl O[S02 Control Technology: N/JI.

lll. Year installed: Ni A

IV. Installed Cost ofConlro] Device ($): N/JI.

v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): N/ A

vi. Expected life of equipment: N / JI.

vii. Relevant sizing infonnation (for example, ifthe conrrol deviec is a pClcked

caustic scrubber, providc caustie u~mgc, paeking volume, etc.): N / A

viii. Design control efficiency (%): N/A

IX. Average Controlled 502Emissions (lblhr): N /A

The following informatioll should be completed U;fiflJ{ data for the year 2002. /finformation

for 2002 is not representatil'e o/current operations (for example, ifIhis wtit is no IOllger u.';ing

naJural gas), provide information for a representative year and provide reasonsfor why tile

alternative year i,f more representatiw tltall 2002.

4. Fuel Infonnation

--I . h T Amount of I Hearmg: Value of r

l

Maximum Fuel Sulfur Content YellI of data if not'l .1stEac ypcof I . .

Fuel u:>oo-+ fuel used I Fuel I (to~~~g Rare ofFud 2002 lind r~li.'>on i

",d wut> IBtullb "BluI"O ~_W_'_'"_Iu_l--+ 10/<_,,_"_W_L_l_-t--,_o_,_no_'_U_Sin_,_20_0_'--j

L Sanderdust L~onSL:-:tU/lb1

11 . 5 ton/hlI

Nil

! Natural Gas i';no MM~c;[ jlO'JO BtU/S.C.:f i· O'3'J._MMCf/hr unkno::-+- --~-----I L. ~_I __"----__

A-3
"YES n NO

If you answered NO above, answer the

1. Emission Unit Name: Roerrunc Sander Dust Burner

a. Type of Boiler (e.g., spreader stoker, suspension-fired, fluidized bed): Suspension Burner

b. Make: Roemmc

e. Model: RB 480

d. Model Year: 1978

e. Year installed: 1979

f. Expected equipment life: Unknown

g. Unit I~ Currently Operational (Cheek One):

If you answered YES above, continue on to h.

tl)llovting and then continue to next unit:

L Date offinal operation:

H. Will this unit be operated in the future (check one)'!

CJ YES [] NO

]f you answered YES above, indicated possible date of operation and continue on to h:

h. Fuel Datil (provide data for each typc offuel used)

1. Unit CapAcity (MMBtullrr): 50 M!vffitu/hr

11. Maximum Fuel Consumption Rate (tOmi/hr): 2.94 Lons/yr

111. Maximum Natural Gas Firing Rate (MMcf/hr): N/A - sustaining flame only

IV. IIigh he<lting value (Btw1b): 8100 Btu/lb

2. Hailer Unit Outlet Information (Complete the following exhaust gas parameters for the'

indicateu boiler. If the boiler shim;s H corrunon slack with another boiler, pleasc only

proviue exhaust infonnation for the speeified boiler).

a. Does this unit share an exhaust sLAck with another unit'! (Check One)

YES [J NO

If you answered YES above, please indicate which other units or emission sources

share this stack: Boiler, 6 wood particle dryers

b. Boiler Outlet Volwnetric Flowra1c (actin): Variable

c. Boiler Outlet Temperature (F): 7 a0-1 050 F

d. Boiler Outlet Moisture (%): 6-7?0"

e. Stack Height (ft): 45. 5 ft

f. Stack Diameter (ft): 6 f t

g. Maximum Gross Heat Input (1vIMBtuJhr): 50 MMBtu/hr

h. Hours ofOperation: 8760

A-4
I. Design Percent Load: Unknown

J. Average Unc(lntrolied PM Emissions (lbfhr): Unknown

k. Average Uncontrolled PMIO Emissions (lb/hr): Unknown

l. Average Uncontrolled NOx Emissions (lblhr): 10.06 lb/hr

m. Average Uncontrolled S02 Emissions (lblhr): Unknown

3. Existing Pollution Conlrol Equipment (Complete lhe following for each piece of control

equipment, make .lldditional copies to provide information for all equipment).

a. PM Control Technology Infonnalion

1. Type of PM Control Technology: Multiclone

ii. Makt>:lM:odel of PM Control Technology: Polutrol, Unknown Model

Ill. Year installed: 1979

l\'. Installed Cost ofControl Device (5): Unknown

v. Annual Operating Cost of Control Device (Sfyr): Minimal

vi. Expected life of equipment: Unknown

Vll. Relevant sizing information (for example, iIthe control device is an tSP,

provide number oftields, collector plate area, etc.): Unknown

viii. Design control efficiency (%): 80- 99\

ix. Average Controlled PM Emissions (lblhr): 15, 3 lb/hr

x. Average Conlrolled PMIO Emissions (lblhr): 17.1 Ib/hr

b. NOx Control Technology Infotmation: No Euipment

L Type ofNOx Control Technology: N/ A

n. MakelM:odel ofNOx Control Technology: N/ A

iii. Yeal" installed: N/ A

IV In~taJkxl Cost of Control Devict': ($): N/ A

v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Devicl: ($/yr): N/ A

VI. Expected life of equipment: N/A

VU. Relev<mt sizing inJ:Cllmalion (for example, ifthe control device is an NCSR,

provide c.lltalyst volume, system capacity, etc,): N/ A

VllI. Design control efficiency (%): N/ A

IX. Average Controlled NOx Emissions (lblhr): N/A

C. S02 Control Teehnology Infotmation

L Type OfS02 Control Technology: No Equipment

11. MakcModel of S02 Control Technology: N/ A

iii, Year installed: N/A

iv. Installed Cost of Control Device ($): N/A

v. Annual Operating Cost of Control Device (S/yr): N/A

vi. Expccled life of equipment: N/ A

VI]. Relevant sizing information (for example, ifthe control device is a packed

emmie sembber, provide caustie usage, packing volumt':, ele,): N/ A

AS
h gesign Pereeflt Load:

j~ Average-ll'ooootra-Hed PM BnOlissiofts (ll3thI}:

k Average UfleOlttf&Hed l!Mttl IWb~if.lns(lbll'lI'-):

h Avcmge-U-floo:fltfOl.le4 NOx- Emissions (lbihr):

Jft;-A-~ft€ontrolled -8-Gz-Emiss-iens (I b/hr):

Roemmc Continued

3. Existing PoJiution Control Equipment (Complete the following for each piece 01' control

equipment, make additional copies to provide information for all equipment).

a. PM Control Technology Information

L Type ofPM Control Technology: Mul t iclone

II. Make/Model of PM Control Technology: WESTEC, Unknown Model

111. Year installed: 19 B7

IV. Installed Cost ofControl Device ($): Unknown

v. Annual Operating Cost of Control Device ($/yr): Mj n:i ma 1

VI. Expected life of equipment: Unknown

Vll. Relevant sizing information (for example, ifthe control device is an ESP,

provide number of fields, collector plate area, etc.): Unknown

Vlll. Design control efficiency (%): 80- 99 %-

lX. Average Controlled PI\,1 Emissions (Iblhr): 2.7 Ib/hr

x, Average Controlled PMj(I Emissions Ob/hr): 2.9 Ib/hr

b; G6fitrot-~eclmology-Jnformution-:

J. 'li'fle----ef-N-9x-GentJei--T-e\7hnolegy:

ii-.-Ma*eIM-edel----0f-NQxGontro-l 'rechnelo-g-y-;-

Ill. ¥ em--iftStaHed-:

IV !nstalle<!-Goot-<7~Coo!rolDev'ce ($)i

v, AnnunIOpem'ing-EeS<~"(S/)'r)

VI. Expected life-ofequiflment

VII. Re-\-evant !.'i7ing imOnnfltion (fOf CXflrnp!e;-i-~---ae¥i6e--i5~

Pf8¥id6-eately-st-velume;---s-ystem ellflaGity-,-ete-+

vm, Design-Q{lfltr-B1--effteienoy (%):

'Bt;--Average Gen!l'elled WOx Bmimens-(lblhr):

c, SGz£entrol-Technol-ogy-In-fetmafi-oo

i.:r~~H~

H~-Mak€_W,{;&atrol Techoolegl"

iii. YeilI----ffi-st-al-lerl:

iv. Installed Cost--ef-G:-entrol. Device ($):

Vc-A_Operating Co;;t"'w""ol-Be~yr}

vi. Expectea---J-i-fe-fff--et]tlipmeffi-'

¥i-h---Rele¥afl.~-ffilg---iflf0Ffflation (fof-eKaHlp-1e-,-if-'Ehe-eon-tro1deviGe:i--s-a-pa6k-ed

eaustio scrubber, provide-ooliSti-eusage, paGkmg~

A-S
viii. Design control e1ficicncy (%): N I A

IX. Average Controlled S02Emissions (lb/hr): N/A

Tire following information .'ihould he completed using data for the year 2002. Ifinformation

for 2002 is not representative ofcurrent operations (for example, ifthis unit is flO longer using

,rmural gas), provide information for a representative year andprovide rellson$ for wiry the

alterna/;L'e yetlr i1J' more representative than 2002.

4. Fuelinformarioll

--_.---_..

AmoWlt of l-k1l1ing Value of , Maximum Fuel Sulfur Content Year of data ifnot

oof

fuel used Fuel Firing Rut\:' ofFui:J 2002 WId r\:'asun

~nd u.nits (I3tll/lb OT Btu/set) (tonfhr or scfi'hr) ('}OS Wt_) fOT not using 2002 .. i .. '---- ._-------

t 15,673 ton 8100 Btu/lb 2.94 ton/hr Nil

. __. -_.. ---- ..__. ._-

N/A

s 4 MMsef 1050 Btu/se sustaining Unknown

flame onlv . .-

.1 I

I

,

i

_L I ._- ..___.__J

Ga

Li~t. Each Typ

Fud U$ed

.._._-~

INatural

!

,

iSanderdus

!

J. Emission Unit Namc: Solagen Sander DUtil Burner

a. Type of Boiler (e.g., spreader stoker, suspension-fired, tluidized bed): Suspen8 ion Burner

b. Make: Solagen

c. Model: NW - 4 5

d. Model Year: 2005

e. Year installed: 2006

f. Expected equipment life: Unknown

g. Unit Is Currently Operational (Check Onc): i'.I YES 0 NO

If you answercd YES above, continue on to h. Uyou answered NO above, answer the

follOWIng lll1d then continue to next unit:

1. Date of fInal operation:

tl. Will this unit be operated in the future (check one)?

:J YES UNO

Jf you answered YES above, indicated possible date of operation and continue on to h:

h. Fuel Data (jJrovjde data for each type of fuel used)

A·6

-_._---_.._.... . .... ----_._._--
45

I. Unit Capacity (MMBtuihr): ~}MMBtu/m

v, Maximum Fuel Consumption Rate (tonslhr): 2.8 tons/hr

VI. Maximum Natural Gas Filing Rate (MMcflhr): .045 J'v1Mcf:/hr

V11. High heating value (Dtu/lb): 8100 Btu/lb

2. Boiler Unit Outlet Information (Complete the following exhall~1 gas parameters for the

indicated boiler. Ifthe boiler shares a cornmon stack with another boiler, please only

provide exhaust information for the specified boiler).

a. Does this unit share an exhaust stack with another unit? (Check One)

Xi YES 0 NO

If you answered YES above, please indicate which oilier units or emission sources

share this stack: Green Particle nryer

b. Boiler Outlet Volumetric Flo\\Tate (acfm): 37 , 178 acfm

c.. Boiler Outlet Temperature (F); 239 F

d. Boiler OUllet Moistwe (%): 41.8%

c. Stal;k Height (ft): 60 f t

[ Stack Diameter 1ft): 4 ft I 10 in

g. Maximom Gross Heat [nput (MMBtuJhr): 45 MMBt u/hr

h. Hours of Operation; 8760

1. Design Percent Load: Unknown

J. Average Uncontrolled PM EJl]is~ions (lb/hr): 20.7 lb/hr (est.)

k. Average Uncontrolled PMlO Emissions (lb/lrr): 8.3 lb/hr (est.)

I. AverageUneontrolledNOxf-:mi:'ision.s(lblhr): 21.03 lb/hr (est.)

m. Average Uncont.rolled S02 Ernis:'iions (1b/hr): 1.125 Ib/hr

3. Existing Pollution Control Equipment (Completc lhe following for each piece of control

equipment, TTll:lke additional copies to provide information for all equipmenl).

a. PM Control Technology Information

1. Type of PM Control Technology: eye lone

11. Make/tvtodel ofPM Control Technology: Solagen/RFP 05 - DM' 2 01

m. Year installed: 2006

IV. Installed Cost of Control Device ($): $200,000 (est.)

v. Annual Operating COS[ ofControl Device (S/yr): Minimal

vi. Expected life of equipmt;:nl: 15 yrs (est . )

Vll. Relevant s'izing information (for exampit;:, ifthc 'conlrol device is an ESP,

provide number of fields, collector plate area, etc.): 13 ft

VHI. De:>ib'1l -.:onlrol cfficit;:ncy (%): 99%

IX. Average Controlled PM Emissions (lb/lrr): Unknown

x. Av~rage Controlled PMIO Emissions (lb/hr): Unknown

b. NOx Control Technology Information:

A-7
,. UnilGapa<ily-(MMBtuihr): 42.2 MMB_

v. Max-i-mum-Fl::l.el-Ge~-ate--fttmsIhFJ-:

¥~. "Ma~m-l-Gas-Firing Rate (MMefi'hr):

¥". fligh-he~_{BtulJb):

2. Boiler Unit Guilet InformatioB (Complete the follov/ing eKhaust gas parameters for the

indieateG-boi-leF.--+14be---BfJ-HCr shares a eommofl-s-tac-k-with another boile~se only

f3fO'lide ex!tl:l:ust iftfaormttrion fer the ::,ll'ccified boiler'}.

a gees-tffis.-u:£HJ--Slt~aek with Mother unit? (Cheek One)

9 YES B-N8

lof-you anHwcred YE&--&be¥c, ple~e indicate which ot1teF units or emissiotl JOtlfC~

sflare4fli<rSl$K-

!oc-·Bttile<-Btltlet-.1fflhlmelffe-F16WT_faefmr

c; Beilef-G1:!tlet--i-emperntl.trefFt:

"' Beil.r 8>l\let-Me;s..",{%)<

e. ~t£l.C-k-Heigflt (ft):

f, 8<aek-flffim'>er-ffl-r

gc -M~,BeflHnput-(MMB_):

h.·--+!tuffil-ofBl""ttti_

i-. gesign PCfecnt bead;

l" Avemge-U-neo-nt1'OHed-PM Emi~sioro-<~o/hr):

1<C--'~-PMro-~fll>liH}

I. Avenl:ge-lJneoRtrollcd-NOx-Rrntssions{lblhr):

ffl;- Average U~~ieffl-flW'illt

Solagen Continued

3. Existing Pollution Control Equipment (Complete the following for each piece of control

equipment, make additional copies to provide information [or all cquipment).

a. PM Control Technology TnfOlroation

i. Type of PM Control Technology: Wet. Electrostatic Precipitator

Ii. MakelModel ofPMControJ Technology: PPC/12R-117-234

Ill. YCl;lrinstalled: 2006

lV. Installed CostofConuol Device ($): $1,100,000

Y. Arumal Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): $ 7 5, 000

VI. Expected life of equipment: 25 yrs (est.)

vii. Relevant siLing information (for cxample, ifthe control device is an ESP,

provid~ number of fields, collector plale ar~a, etc.): 3 S I 000 cfm

VIII. Design control cfticicney (%): 80%

IX, Average Controlled PM Emissions (lb/hr): 3.93 lb/hr

x. Average Controlled PMlO Emissions (lblhr): 3.93 Ib/hr

b. NOx Contrcd Technologylnformation:
1. Type of NOx Control Technology: Low NOx Burner/Flue Gas Reini ection

II. Makc/Model ofNOx Control Technology:Solagen

111. Year in:;talled: 2006

IV. Installed Cost ofControl Device ($): Inherent with cOst of Solagen Burner

v. Annual Operating Cost of Control Device ($/yl'): Unknown

VI. ExpecLed life of equipment: 25 yrs (est.)

VII. Relevant sizing information (for example, if rhe control device is an NCSR,

provide catalyst volume, system capacity, etc.): N/A

'1111. Design controll~fficiency (%): UnknDwn

IX. Average Controlled NOx Emissions (lblhr): 20.5 lb/hr

e. SOl Control Technology Information

1. Type ofS02 Control TechnoLogy: No Equipment

II. Make/Model ofS02 Contrul Teehnology: N/A

lll. Year installed: N/A

IV, Installed Cost ofControl Device ($): N/A

v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): N / A

VI. Expected liCe or equipment N / A

VII. ReJevoot sizing infonnation (for example, ifthe control device is a packed

Cftustjc scrubber, provide caustic usage, packing volume, etc.); N/A

Vlli. Design control efficiency (%): N/ A

ix. Averagc Controlled SOl Emis~ions (lb/hr): N/ A

The following information should be completed using datafor the year 2002. ifinformation

for 2002 is not representative ofcurrent operations (fof example, ifthis unit u' no longer using

natural gas), provide information for a representative year and provide reasonsfor wlty tile

alternative year if mare representative than 2002.

4. Fuel Information

List Each Type of

Fuel Used

Sanderdust

-~---~--c-~~--c----c-,--c~-=---rcc-:-c-ccc

Amoun! of Heating Value of MilXimwn Fuel Sulfur Content Year of data it'not i

fuel used FUl:l FIt-ing Ralc ofFuel 2002 and re5,oo

and units (BruJlb or Btu!:;c!) (toulhr or sc£ihr) (%S Wt.) for nOl using 2002 ----- 6894 2.8 tons/ 2008

8100 I3tu/lb <0.05% ,Equipment di

tons hr 'xist in 2002

not

Natural Gas

---_..•_--_._._~

17 MMscf 1050 BtU/sc .045

j Ml>1scf /hr ~---~._--

A-S

Unknown

, Equipment di~

exist ~n 200

not
1- i

Lj

DYES uNO

Ifyou answered NO above, answer

1, Emission Unit Name: GEKA200 Hot Oil Heater

a. Make:Geka

b. Model: Geka 200

c. Model Year:

d. Year Installed:

e, Expected equipment life:

C Unit Is Currelltly Operational (Check One):

IfyOll answered YES above, L:onlinuc 011 to g.

the following and then continue to next unit:

I. Date offinal opcmtion:

L1. Will this unit be operated in the future (L:hcck one)?

DYES UNO

If you answered YES above, indicated possible date of operation and continue to g:

g. Unit Capaciry (MMBtWhr): 20 MMBt.u'hr

2. UJJit Stack Information

11. Slal:k Volumetric FloVl-Tate (acfm):

b. Stack Exhaust Temperature (F):

c. Stack Exhaust Moisture (%):

d. Stack !leight (ft):

e. Sti:1ck Diameter (ft):

f. Maximum Gross Heat Inpul (MMBtw'hr):

g. HOUTS of Operation:

h. Design Percent LOCld:

L Average Uneontrolled PM Emissions (lb/hr):

J. Average Uncontrolled NOx Emissions (Iblhr):

k. Average Uncontrolled SO~ Emissions (lb/hr):

3. Existing Pollution Control Equipment (Complete the following for each piece of control

L:quipmenl, make additional copies to provide infonnation for all equipment).

<1, PM Control Technology Informalion

1. Type of PM Control Teel111ology:

11. Makeflv10dcI ofPM Control Technology:

A-9
ilL Year installed:

iv. Installed Cost of Control Device ($):

v. Annual Operating Co~t of Control Device ($/yr):

VI. Expected life of equipment:

V11. Relevant sizing informalion (for example, if the control device is an

ESP, provide number of fields, collector plate are~, etc.):

lilll. Design control efficiency (%):

lX. Average Controllcu PM Emissions (lh/hr);

b. NOx Control Technology lnfommtion:

1. Type ofNOx Control Technology:

ii. Make/Model ofNOX Control Technology:

lll. Year installcu:

lV. Installed Cost ofCootrol Device ($):

\I, Annual Operating Cost of Control Device ($/yr):

VI. Expected life of equipmenl:

Vll. Relevant sizing infonnation (for example, iflhe control device is all

NCSR, provide cat~lyst volume, system capacity, etc.):

viii. Design control efficiency (%):

IX. Average CODlrolleU NOx Emissions (lblhr):

c. S02 COlltrol Technology Information

1. Type of SOl Control Techno)ogy;

11. Mnkefi\1odcl ofSOz Conlrol Teelmology;

iii. Year installed:

iv. Installed Cosl ofControl Device ($):

v. Annual Operating Cost of Control Device ($/yr):

VI. Expected life of equipment:

vii. Relevant sizing infonnation (for example, ifthe control device is a

piH;ked caustic scruhber, provide caustic usage, packing volume_ etc.):

viii. Design control efficiency (%):

IX. Average Controlled S<hEmissions (lblhr):

Thefollowing information should he completed u.vi"g data for the year 2002. Ifinformation

for 2002 is not representative Qf current operations ((or example, ifthis unit is no longer using

natural gns), provide information for a representative year andprovide reasonsfor why the

alternative year is more representative than 2002.

4. Fuel Information

Li,' Each Amount of Heatmg V~=T~aximum fuel [

Type=--c0_f~.--,--=F__u=.c".:.I-=l_J::-c-=od-=--L-__of--=Fuc1 ."._ I Firin~__~_te_..

A-10

Sulfur

Cuutcnt of

··--l

Year of data ifnot I

2002 and reason :
for nut ;",;;g:i0021

,

IFUclU;~d C

~-

and UTIil'_~ CBtulSCfm:--j__(S_C£_lhr_):_ I Fuel (%S Wt)

-+--+---+--

~rI---

----1---------1

I

I

____-------'L

1. Emission Unit Name: Six (6) Wood Particle Dryers

u. Make:

b. Model:

c. ModeJ Year:

d. Year lnstalkd:

c. Expected ~quipmenlliffJ:

f. Unit Is Currently Operational (Che<:k One): [l YeS r:: NO

£fyau answered YES above, continue on to 2. If you amwcrcd NO above, answer

the following and then continue to next unit:

I. Date offinal operation:

ii. Will this unit be operated in the future (check one)?

::J YES r NO

Ifyol! an~wcred YES above, indicate possible date of operation and continue on Lo 2.

2. Unit Stack Information

3. Stack Volumetric FloV\iTate (ar.:fm):

h. Stack Exhaust Temperature (F):

G. Slack Exhaust Moisture (%):

d. Stack Height (ft):

e. Staek Diameter (ft):

f. Maximum Gross Heal Iupul (MMBtulhr):

g. I-lours ofOperation:

h. DGsign Percent Load:

I. Avemge Uncontrolled PM Emissions (lb/hr):

]. Average Uncontrolled PMw Emissions (lblhr):

A-ll

.. - -----_...__.--_....__._-------
k. Average Uncontrolled NOx Emissions (lb/hr):

I. Avera~e Oneontrolled S02 Emissions (lbJhr):

3, Existing Pollution Control Equipment (Complete lhe following for each piece of control

equipment, make additional copies to provide information for all equipment).

a. PM Control Technology Information

1. Type of PM Control Technology:

II. Make/I\1odel of PM Control TcdUJology:

iii Year installed:

IV. Installed CosL ofConlrol Device ($):

v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($iyr):

V1. Expected life of equipment:

vii. Relevant sizing information (for example, if the control device is an ESP,

pmvide nwnbcr of lields, collector plate area, etc.):

viii. Design control efficiency (%):

IX. Average Con1rolled PM Emissions (Iblhr):

x. Average ConLro!kd PM lO Emissions (lb/hr):

b. N"Ox Control Teclmology Information:

1. Type ofNOx Control Technology;

11. MakelModcl ofNOx Conlrol TeelmoJogy:

iii, Year imtalled:

IV. lmtalled Cost ofControl Device ($):

v. Annual Operating Cost ofConlrol Device ($/yr):

VL Expected life ofequipment:

vii. Relevant !;izing information (for example, ifthe control device is an NCSR,

provide catalyst volume, system capacity, etc.):

viii. Design control efficiency (%):

IX. Average Controlled NOx Emissions (Iblbr):

c. SCl}. Control Technology Infonnation

l. Type 01'802 Control Tec;lmology:

ii. MakelMod~l of802 Control Teclmology:

iii. Year inslalled.

lV. Installed Cost of Control Device (5):

v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Devit:e ($/yr):

iiI. Expected lile of equipment

vii. Relevant sizing infonnation (for cxample, ifthe control device is a packed

caustic scrubber, pwvide caustic usage, packing volume, etc.):

viiI. Design l,;ontrol efficiency (%):

ix_ Avcragt: Control1ed S02 Emissions (Iblbr):
Tile following informalion should he completed using data for the year 2002. Ifin/ormation

for 2002 is not representatiw ofcurrent opera/ions (for example, iftills unit is no IOllger using

natural gu.s), provide itiformo.tionfor a representative year and provide rem..-onsfor why the

alternative year is more representath'c than 2002.

4 FueJ Informatiun

List Each

l'ype ofFucl

Used

-.-.-------'--'-_._--

I

t=.

-I I i

I L__.L.-_·-~_r__J

1. Emis::;ion Unil Name: Melamine Burner (Natural O<ls)

a. Make:

b. Model:

c. Model YCllr:

d. Year Installed:

e. Expected equipment life:

f. Unit Is Currently Operational (Check One): 0 YES 1-_1 NO

If you an.swercd 'YES above, continue on to g, If you answered NO above, answer

the following and then continue to next unit:

{. Date offinal operation:

11. Will thi:; unit. be operated in the future (cheek one)?

DYES rJ NO

If you fmswered YES above, indicate possible datc of oper3tion and cont.inue to g.

g, lJni~ Capacity (MMBtu/hr): 3 MM13tuJhr

2. Unit Stack Informatioll

a, Stack Volumetric FJoWTllte (acfrn):

b. Stack Exhaust Temperalure (F):

A-13
c. Stack Exhaust Moisture (%):

d. Stack Height (fL)

e. Stack Diameter (ft):

f. Maximum Gross Heat Input (fvfMBtulhr):

g. Hours of Operation:

h. Design Perccnt Load:

1. Average Uncontrolled PM Emissicms (lb/hr):

J. Avcrage Uncontrolled NOx Emissions (lblhr):

k. Average Uncontrolleu S02 Emissions (lb/hr):

3. Existing Pollution Control Equipmcnt (Completc the follovving for each piecc ofl:onlrol

cquipment, makc additional copies to provide information for all equipml:nt).

a, PM Control Technology Information

1. Type of PM Control Technology:

11. MakelModel of PM ContIol Technology:

IlL Year installed:

IV. Insrallcd Cost ofControl Device ($):

v. Amlual Operating Cosl o[Control Device ($/yr):

v!. t-:xpected life of equipment:

V1\, Relevant sizing information (for example, ifthe conlrol device i~ an ESP,

provide number ,,1' fields, collector plate area, etc.):

Vlll. Design control efficiency (%):

ix. Average Conlrollcd PM Emissions (lh/hr):

b. NOx Control Tedmology lnfonnation:

L Type ofNOx Control Technology:

ii. MakelModel ofNOx Control Technology:

11L Year in~lalled:

IV. Installed Cost of Control Device ($):

v. Annual Operating Cost of Control Device ($/yr):

vi. Expected life of equipment:

vii. Relevant sizing information (tor example, ifthe control device is an NCSR,

provide cataly~t volume, system capacity, etc.):

viii. Design control efficiency (%):

ix. Average Controlled NOx Emissions (lblhr):

c. S02 Conlro] Technology lnformation

Type of S02 Control Technology:

ll. :t\.1ake/Model of802 Control Technology:

lll. Year installed:

iv. In$w.lled Cost orConlfor Device ($):

v. Annual Operaling Cost ufControl Device ($/yr):

A-14
_____ .J

DYES :J NO

Ifyou answered NO above, answer

Ill. Expected life of equipment:

VII. Relevant :sizing information (for example, if the control device is a packed

caustic scrubber, provide caustic llS<1ge, packing volume, etc.):

viii. Design control cftlciency (%):

IX. Average Controlled SO:I Emissions (lb/hr):

Thefo/lowillg information should be comp/ete'/ using data for Ihe year 2002. If infonnotion

for 2002 is not representative ofcurrent operations (jor example, iftills IInit is no longer using

natural gas), provide informat;orlfor a representative year {l1!d provide reasonsfor why the

altemative year is more representaJivi! tha" 2002.

4. FuellnformatiOI1

I List Each Amount of : Heating Value Maximum fuel Sllifur Year of data if not

I I Type of Fuel Used ~fFuel Firing Rate , Content of 2002 and rcason 1\101 USOd~nd Unit' __ I (Btu_'_'s,_C"_ffic.1_'---,-__(:..s_cL_Ihr-c- 1: fuel (%S WI) ,_for not using 2002

I~---- !

. ·---1,

JI

I I i

r----t---+---+--..---=---j- r---~- l. .L- ,I _

1. Emission Unit Name: RTO (Natural Gas)

a. Make:

b. Model:

L~, ModeJ Year:

d, Year Installed:

e. Expected equipment life:

f. Unills Currently Operation.al (Check One):

If you iUlswered YES above, continue on to g.

the tollO',¥ing and then continue to next unit,

L Date offmal operation:

lL Will this unit be operated in the future (check one)?

'l YES [J NO

A·15
lfyol! answered YES above, indicate possible dale of operatjon and continue to g.

g. Unit Capacity (MMBtu/hr): 8 MMBtuIhr

2. Unit Stack TnforTI1ation

a. Stack Vohlmelric Flowrale (acfm):

b. Stack Exhaust Temperature (F):

c. Stack Exhau~t Moisture (%):

d. Stack Height (ft):

e. St"ck Diameter (Il):

f. Maximwn Gross Hea~ Input (MMBtw'hr):

g. Hour::; of Operation:

h. Design Percent Load:

I. Average Uncontrolled PM Emissions (lblhr):

J. Average Uncontrolled NOx Emissions (lblhr):

k. Average Uncontrolled SOL Emissions (lb/'nr):

'0

3. Existing Pollulion Control Equipment (Completc the following fOf each picce of control

cquipmem, make additional copies to provide information for all equipment).

a PM Control Teclmology Information

1. Type of PM Control Technology:

II. Make/Model of PM Control Tcchnology:

111. YellT installed:

IV. Installed Cost ofCon(:rol Device ($):

v, AIUlual Operating Cost of Control Device ($/yr):

v\. Expected life of equipmenl:

vii. Relevam sizing: information (for example, iftht: control device is an ESP,

provide number offield~, collector plate area, ctc.):

VIll. Design control efficiency (%):

IX. Average Controlkd PM Emissions (Ib/hr):

b. NOx Control Technology Information'

1. Type of NOx Control Technology:

II. MnkelModel ofNOx Control Technology;

111. Yei:1f insli:1l1cd:

IV. Installed Cost of Control Device ($):

v. Aruma} Operating Cost of Control Device ($/yr):

VI. Expected life ofequipmenl:

V1J. Relevant sizing infonnation (for example, ifthc control device is an NCSR,

provide c~~lysL volume, system capacity, etc.):

"111. Design control efficiency (%):

lX. Average Controlled NOx Emi~.sions (Ib/hr):

A-16
c. S02 Control Technology Information

1. Type of S02 Control Technology:

lL. MakelModel of S02 Control Technology:

111. Year installed:

tv. Installed Cost ofControl Device ($):

v. Annual Operating Cost ofConLm] Device ($/yr):

VI. Expected life of equipment:

VI]. Relevnnt sizing information (for example, ifthe eontrol device is a packed

caustic ~crubbcI, provide caustic usage, packing volume, etc.):

VllI. Design control efficiency (%):

IX. Average Controlled S02Emissions (lb/hr):

The following informatiQn should he completed Elsing data for the year 2002. Ifinformation

for 2002 if 1I0t representative ofcurrent operations (jor example. ifthis unit is nQ longer using

natural gaj), prm'ide inforJ7Ultioflfor a representaave y~ur andprovide reasonsfor why the

alternative year is more representative than 2002.

Year of data -ifnoil

2U02 and reason

for nol using 2002

of

Wt.)

----- - .'_.-

f Heating Value :v1aximum fuel Sulfur ,

I I

of Fue! Firing Rate ContenL

s (Btulscfm) (,emlf)' Fuel ('}OS -- -~

_..--"...

I

I

t - - -- -_.-

!

4. Fuellnfonnation

r---- T-------

,

List Each Type I Amount ofFuc

ofhlel Used Used and Unit

L --" _

A-17
STATEMt;NT OF CERTIFICATION

I certify under penalty of la....... that I have personally examined and llD1 familiar wilh the

information submitted in this docwncnt and aJll1ttachments and that, based on my inquiry

of tbose individuals immediately responsible for obtaining information, J believe that tht.:

information is true, aecurate, and complete. r am aware that there are significant

penalties for .';ubmitting false information, including the possibility affine or

impnsonment

t"

~---. '--~:;r2f- -_...------- Signature

Plant/ Manager

Title

- ------_. --------_._--