alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         5,919,500
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      69,200
<MORTGAGE>                                      23,800
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   72,700
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               6,363,700
<CASH>                                          28,700
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         430,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,643,700
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 525,800
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        5,494,300
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                201,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          218,100<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     488,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,643,700
<PREMIUMS>                                      49,900
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            123,300
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (2,900)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  10,900
<BENEFITS>                                     102,900
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     15,200
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            31,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of subsidiary trusts
</FN>


</TABLE>
(No. 862

Claimant awarded $14,476.22 with interest.)

#### Lucile Hirsch Hilborn and Milton S. Hirsch, Executors and Trustees of the Estate of Isaac Hirsch, Deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1925.*

Inheritance *tax*— when *refund will be made, Sec. 25.*Where upon proper proceeding an estate is re-appraised and the tax re-assessed and the tax reduced, claimant is entitled to a refund of the difference between the amount of the tax paid under the original order and the amount found due upon the re-assessment.

Simeon Straus and Ira E Straus, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

This suit is brought by Lucile Hirsch Hilborn and Milton S. Hirsch, executors of the last will and testament of Isaac Hirsch, deceased, to recover $14,476.22 refund of inheritance taxes under provisions of Sec. 25, Inheritance Tax Laws of Illinois.

The evidence is clear and undisputed in this case and admitted by the Attorney General, who consents to an award of the amount claimed, and our statement will be brief.

September 5,1923, claimants paid the assessed inheritance tax assessed, to amount of $51,187.23.

On 31st day of December, 1924, the county court, on proper petition, entered an order for re-appraisement and re-assessment as to the one-third of the residuary estate held for the *108benefit of Lncile Hirsck Hilborn, the petitioner therein, and on a proper hearing, the court entered its order assessing the same in sum of $39,405.07 and found that the petitioner was entitled to have returned the difference between the original assessment and the last order re-assessing same, to-wit: the sum of $14,476.22 with interest at 3% per annum from September 5, 1923.

The Attorney General was notified of this procedure and made no objection to the re-assessment, etc. It is never necessary in deciding these inheritance tax cases to go further back of the orders and findings of the court on the petition for re-appraisement and re-assessment. Certified copies of the orders and findings of the county court are filed in evidence and the Attorney General admits that upon an examination of the evidence, the claimants are entitled to the sum of $14,476.22.
### §65. Ordinary loss defined

For purposes of this subtitle, the term "ordinary loss" includes any loss from the sale or exchange of property which is not a capital asset. Any loss from the sale or exchange of property which is treated or considered, under other provisions of this subtitle, as "ordinary loss" shall be treated as loss from the sale or exchange of property which is not a capital asset.

(Added Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(a)(11), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1765.)
#### § 4.1129 Certification of record.

Except in expedited review proceedings under § 4.1180, within 5 days after an initial decision has been rendered, the administrative law judge shall certify the official record of the proceedings, including all exhibits, and transmit the official record for filing in the Hearings Division, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 88 FR 5795, Jan. 30, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     Micro-Economics, Inc. June 30, 2000 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894552
<NAME>                        MICRO-ECONOMICS, INC.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .00



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,

Gordon D.
Browning, Chief Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gordon D. Browning                              
|Gordon D. Browning                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 7, 2008
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. (Historicalpurposes)
**Title:****Federal student aid at aglance.**
 
2016/17 | 2017/18| 2018/19 | 2019/20 | 2020/21
 
SuDoc:ED 1.2:C 68/15/
Item Number:0455-B-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001033107
 
October 30, 2017
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.


/s/ Mark J. Cowan
Mark J. Cowan
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 6, 2004
### §5052. Definitions

#### (a) Beer

For purposes of this chapter (except when used with reference to distilling or distilling material) the term beer means beer, ale, porter, stout, and other similar fermented beverages (including sake or similar products) of any name or description containing one-half of 1 percent or more of alcohol by volume, brewed or produced from malt, wholly or in part, or from any substitute therefor.

#### (b) Gallon

For purposes of this subpart, the term gallon means the liquid measure containing 231 cubic inches.

#### (c) Removed for consumption of sale

Except as provided for in the case of removal of beer without payment of tax, the term "removed for consumption or sale", for the purposes of this subpart means—

#### (1) Sale of beer

The sale and transfer of possession of beer for consumption at the brewery; or

#### (2) Removals

Any removal of beer from the brewery.

#### (d) Brewer

For purposes of this chapter, the term "brewer" means any person who brews beer or produces beer for sale. Such term shall not include any person who produces only beer exempt from tax under section 5053(e).

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1333; amended Pub. L. 91–673, §1(b), Jan. 12, 1971, 84 Stat. 2056; Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11125(b)(15), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1956.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5052, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 612, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

2005—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–59 amended subsec. (d) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "For definition of brewer, see section 5092."

1971—Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 91–673 struck out proviso that removal of beer shall not include beer returned to the brewery on the same day such beer is removed from the brewery.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–59 effective July 1, 2008, but inapplicable to taxes imposed for periods before such date, see section 11125(c) of Pub. L. 109–59, set out as a note under section 5002 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1971 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–673 effective on first day of first calendar month which begins more than 90 days after Jan. 12, 1971, see section 5 of Pub. L. 91–673, set out as a note under section 5056 of this title.
#### § 3861.4 Contract for surveys.
114 STAT. 484 PUBLIC LAW 106–231—JULY 6, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 642:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 145 (1999): Nov. 18, considered and passed House.

Vol. 146 (2000): June 23, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–231

106th Congress

An Act

To redesignate the Federal building located at 701 South Santa Fe Avenue in

Compton, California, and known as the Compton Main Post Office, as the ‘‘Mervyn

Malcolm Dymally Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 701 South Santa Fe Avenue

in Compton, California, and known as the Compton Main Post

Office, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Mervyn Malcolm

Dymally Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mervyn

Malcolm Dymally Post Office Building’’.

Approved July 6, 2000.

July 6, 2000

[H.R. 642]
EXHIBIT 2

                  STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                     THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Arthur J.
Seidenfeld certify that:

1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2002
    (the "Report") of Scientio, Inc. (the "Company"), fully complies with
    the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.

Date: November 25, 2002

                       /s/ Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                       ------------------------
                         Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                 President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 3505.40 After submitting my application, do I need to submit anything else?

Yes. After we initially review your permit application, but before we issue the prospecting permit, we will require you to submit three copies of an exploration plan under § 3505.45 of this part. You must also submit a bond. See 43 CFR part 3504, especially 43 CFR 3504.50, for information on bonds.
#### Perrin *et al. v.*Douglas.

February 24, 1911.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Pendleton. Pulton superior court. December 11, 1909.

The cause of action was an alleged mutual mistake of calculation in taking notes for the purchase-price of land sold to the defendant.

*R. B. Blackburn,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Westmoreland Brothers,*contra.

Holden, J.

Under the pleadings and the competent evidence admitted . without objection, the verdict directed by the court in favor of the plaintiff was demanded; and none of the assignments of error require a reversal.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Evans, P. J., dissenting.*
#### William F. Waldron, Appellant, v. Catherine Sullivan and Others, Respondents. (Action No. 1.)

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondents, including the guardian ad litem for the infant Teresa. Ho opinion. Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., taking no part.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Thomas R. Moyes,certify that:

 

1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for theyear ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) of MediCor Ltd. (the “Company”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of MediCor.

 
| Date: June 6, 2005 |                    |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    |                    |
|                    | /s/ Thomas R. Moyes     |   |
|                    | Thomas R. Moyes         |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-60919-CIV-SMITH

MARCOS COTAYO,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

FEDERAL EXPPRESS

CORPORATION,

Defendant. 

 /

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 

to District Judge [DE 67], in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant be awarded 

$3,778.10 in costs to be paid to Defendant’s counsel. No objections have been filed. Having 

reviewed, de novo, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation to District Judge and the 

record, and given that there are no objections, it is

ORDERED that:

1) The Report and Recommendation to District Judge [DE 67] is AFFIRMED and 

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this Court’s Order.

2) Defendant’s Motion for Bill of Costs is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Defendant shall be awarded $3,778.10 only. 

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 4th day of November 2022.

cc: Counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-60919-RS Document 68 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 1 of 1
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4791 

AN ACT 

To amend section 301 of title 44, United States Code, to 

establish a term for the appointment of the Director 

of the Government Publishing Office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4791 ES

1 SECTION 1. TERM FOR APPOINTMENT OF THE DIRECTOR 

2 OF THE GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 301 of title 44, United 

4 States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘The President’’; 

6 and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(b) The Director shall be appointed for a term of 

9 10 years. 

10 ‘‘(c) An individual appointed to the position of Direc11 tor, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 

12 may be reappointed to that position in accordance with 

13 subsections (a) and (b).’’. 

14 (b) APPLICATION TO INCUMBENT.—If there is an in15 dividual serving in the position of Director of the Govern16 ment Publishing Office, by and with the advice and con17 sent of the Senate, on the date of enactment of this Act— 

18 (1) the amendments made by subsection (a) 

19 shall apply with respect to the appointment of such 

20 individual; and 

21 (2) the term of the individual for purposes of 

22 subsection (b) of section 301 of title 44, United 

23 States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall be 

24 considered to have started on the date on which the 
3 

†S 4791 ES

1 individual assumed the office of Director of the Gov2 ernment Publishing Office. 

Passed the Senate September 6, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4791 

AN ACT 

To amend section 301 of title 44, United States 

fice. the Director of the Government Publishing OfCode, to establish a term for the appointment of
(No. 917

Claimant awarded $222.50.)

#### St. Anthony’s Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

*Services*— award *may*6e *made.*The decision of the court announced in the case of *Henry*v. *State, supra,*governs this claim.

Parker & Bauer, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for hospital service furnished for one D. L. McGregor with the knowledge and consent of the State of lilinois through its proper officers; that the said patient was injured while in active service in the employ of the State of Illinois in the Department of Public Works and Buildings. It appears to the court that the Chief Highway Engineer examined the claim which is made in the sum of $222.50 and finds that the same is just and reasonable.

Therefore it is considered by the court that claimant be allowed the said sum of $222.50.
### §494. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 494 was editorially reclassified as section 5143 of this title.
### §396d. Rules and regulations governing operations; limitations on oil or gas leases

All operations under any oil, gas, or other mineral lease issued pursuant to the terms of sections 396a to 396g of this title or any other Act affecting restricted Indian lands shall be subject to the rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior. In the discretion of the said Secretary, any lease for oil or gas issued under the provisions of sections 396a to 396g of this title shall be made subject to the terms of any reasonable cooperative unit or other plan approved or prescribed by said Secretary prior or subsequent to the issuance of any such lease which involves the development or production of oil or gas from land covered by such lease.

(May 11, 1938, ch. 198, §4, 52 Stat. 348.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal of Inconsistent Acts

For repeal of inconsistent acts, see section 7 of act May 11, 1938, set out as a note under section 396a of this title.