alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Indigenous Knowledge and Traditional Ecological Knowledge





Contact Us
  Tribal Research Policies, Processes and Protocols
 To facilitate the respectful inclusion of TEK for on-the-ground ecosystem stewardship, the following American Indian tribes have freely and with informed consent, provided information about their policies, processes and protocols (PPP). Tribes are listed alphabetically, using the names from the January 17, 2017, Federal Register Notice Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible To Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs*.* Please keep in mind, some tribal names officially begin with "the" and will be located under "T."*A Tribe's listing on this site does not constitute commitment to participate in TEK projects. As sovereign nations, tribes reserve the right to determine research participation.* *Researchers* are encouraged to contact the office listed for more information and to initiate conversations about project ideas. *Tribes and Indigenous communities* without protocols or those wanting to update their protocols may use the contacts listed to learn about other tribes' policies, processes and protocols (PPP).
The Tribal Policies, Processes, and Protocols page relies heavily on a program developed in the Intermountain Region of the National Park Service in partnership with the University of Colorado-Denver. However, Tribes from across the United States are welcome to participate if they wish. Please Contact Us for more information or to have your information added to this list. If your tribe's information is listed and needs updated, please Contact Us.*****Note: You will see the acronym "THPO" on the entries below. THPO stands for Tribal Historic Preservation Officer.*
We've had so many tribes participate that we've divided the list into subpages, so please look by first letter of a tribe's name on these pages: Tribes A-C     Tribes D-M     Tribes N-P     Tribes Q-T      Tribes U-Z
 Last updated: August 30, 2019
 Tools Site Index
Contact Us


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
§ 3602.33 How will BLM dispose of mineral materials for use in developing Federal mineral leases? ( a ) If you propose to use mineral materials in connection with developing a mineral lease issued by BLM, we may, without calling for competitive bids, sell you at fair market value a volume of mineral materials not exceeding a total of 200,000 cubic yards (or weight equivalent) in one State in any period of 12 consecutive months.
( b ) If the materials remain within the boundaries of the lease, BLM will not charge for mineral materials that you must move in order to extract minerals under a Federal lease, whether or not you use them for lease development.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!9

!9

!9!9!9

!9

!9

!9!9

!9

!9!y

!9

!9

!Ô!9

!9

!©

!y

!l !l

!l

!y

!y

!l

!y

!l

!y

!l

!l

!y

!y

!y

!Ô

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T34N

T35N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

Cora

Merna

Daniel

Boulder

Pinedale

LaBarge

Marbleton

Big Piney

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

!y Boating Access

!9 Campground

!l Fishing Access

!© Shooting Range

!Ô Trailhead

Pinedale Pedestrian Pathway

Developed Recreation Resources

Map 3-6

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Warren Bridge

Boulder Lake

Stokes Crossing

Scab Creek

New Fork

Cottonwood C reek

La Barge Creek

Middle Piney Creek

Green River

East Fork River

CCC Ponds

Warren Bridge

Continental

Divide

Snowmobile

LaBarge Green

Whelan Bridge

Dry Piney

Names Hill

Fontenelle

Ferry Island

Ross Butte

New Fork River

Gas Wells

New Fork/East

Fork Confluence

Huston

Sporting Clays

Duck

Creek

Ehman

Lane

Pinedale

Pedestrian

Pathway

Sixty Seven Reservoir

9
#### § 3863.1-2 Proof of improvements for patent.

The proof of improvements must show their value to be not less than $500 and that they were made by the applicant for patent or his grantors. This proof should consist of the statement of two or more disinterested witnesses.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFlow unsteadiness effects on boundary layersThe development of boundary layers at high subsonic speeds in the presence of either mass flux fluctuations or acoustic disturbances (the two most important parameters in the unsteadiness environment affecting the aerodynamics of a flight vehicle) was investigated. A high quality database for generating detailed information concerning free-stream flow unsteadiness effects on boundary layer growth and transition in high subsonic and transonic speeds is described. The database will be generated with a two-pronged approach: (1) from a detailed review of existing literature on research and wind tunnel calibration database, and (2) from detailed tests in the Boundary Layer Apparatus for Subsonic and Transonic flow Affected by Noise Environment (BLASTANE). Special instrumentation, including hot wire anemometry, the buried wire gage technique, and laser velocimetry were used to obtain skin friction and turbulent shear stress data along the entire boundary layer for various free stream noise levels, turbulence content, and pressure gradients. This database will be useful for improving the correction methodology of applying wind tunnel test data to flight predictions and will be helpful for making improvements in turbulence modeling laws.Document ID19900015241Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMurthy, Sreedhara V.*(University of the Pacific Stockton, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186067NASA-CR-186067Accession Number90N24557Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-357Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015241.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3602.32 What volume and other limitations pertain to noncompetitive sales associated with public works projects? BLM may sell mineral materials not exceeding 400,000 cubic yards (or weight equivalent), at not less than fair market value, without advertising or calling for bids if: ( a ) BLM determines the sale to be in the public interest; and
( b ) The materials will be used in connection with an urgent public works improvement program on behalf of a Federal, State, or local governmental agency, and time does not permit advertising for a competitive sale.
§ 4.1171 Burden of proof in review of section 521 notices or orders. ( a ) In review of section 521 notices of violation or orders of cessation or the modification, vacation, or termination thereof, including expedited review under § 4.1180, OSM shall have the burden of going forward to establish a prima facie case as to the validity of the notice, order, or modification, vacation, or termination thereof.
( b ) The ultimate burden of persuasion shall rest with the applicant for review.
§ 3192.13 What responsibilities must BLM keep? ( a ) Under cooperative agreements, BLM continues to— ( 1 ) Issue Notices of Incidents of Noncompliance that impose monetary assessments and penalties;
( 2 ) Collect assessments and penalties;
( 3 ) Calculate and distribute shared civil penalties;
( 4 ) Train and certify Tribal or State inspectors;
( 5 ) Issue and regulate inspector identification cards; and
( 6 ) Identify leases to be inspected, taking into account the priorities of the Tribe. Priorities for allotted lands will be established through consultation with the BIA office with jurisdiction over the lands in the agreement.
( b ) If BLM enters into a cooperative agreement, that agreement does not affect BLM's right to enter lease sites to conduct inspections, enforcement, investigations or other activities necessary to supervise lease operations.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-21964-CIV-ALTONAGA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff, 

v.

TCA FUND MANAGEMENT 

GROUP CORP, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court sua sponte. On July 11, 2022, the Court held a

hearing on the Receiver’s Motion for Approval of Distribution Plan and First Interim Distribution

[ECF No. 279]. The Receiver’s Motion [ECF No. 208] designates the 670 worst-off 

Unsubordinated Net Loser investors to receive an initial distribution so that no Unsubordinated 

Net Loser would have incurred a loss exceeding 75% of its aggregate cash investment. (See id. 

27). The remaining Net Losers, 46 of whom were subordinated and 177 of whom were 

unsubordinated but had already recouped 25% or more of their losses, would not receive a 

distribution. (See id. 26–31).

At the hearing, Receiver’s counsel acknowledged that while the Proposed Distribution 

Plan’s scheme remains the same, these numbers have changed, as the Receiver has identified more 

Unsubordinated Net Losers. The Receiver’s counsel posited that the Receiver now wishes to make 

a distribution to 739 Unsubordinated Net Losers, whose losses would then be capped at 76.9%. 

This differs slightly from the figures in the Receiver’s Reply [ECF No. 263], which provide that 

Case 1:20-cv-21964-CMA Document 280 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2022 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 20-21964-CIV-ALTONAGA

2

the worst-off 736 Unsubordinated Net Losers would receive a distribution that caps their losses at 

76.83%. (See id. 14).

The Court understands that this process is in flux, as the Receiver identifies more investors 

and makes appropriate changes to the number of investors in each category and the amount each 

investor would receive under the Proposed Distribution Plan. These numbers are likely to change 

again in the future. But to fairly evaluate the Proposed Distribution Plan, the Court does need 

consistent numbers as to how many investors the Receiver has identified so far, how the Receiver

presently categorizes those investors, and the current loss cap. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

(1) The Receiver shall file a status report with the Court by July 15, 2022 stating 

specifically (A) how many total investors it has identified; (B) how many investors are currently 

classified as Subordinated Net Losers, Unsubordinated Net Losers, and Net Winners; (C) how 

many investors would receive something in the first interim distribution, as it currently stands; and 

(D) what the loss cap would be.

(2) The Receiver shall also submit an attachment to the status report identifying every 

Unsubordinated Net Loser and specifying how much each subordinated Net Loser is due to receive.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 12th day of July, 2022.

_______________________________________

CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-21964-CMA Document 280 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2022 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of RTCA/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee. 

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a meeting of the RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held October 7, 2004, 12-5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Round Conference Room (10th Floor) Washington, DC, 20591.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 833-9434; Web site                         *http://www.rtca.org.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for the Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee meeting.

# Note:

*Non-Government attendees to the meeting must go through security and be escorted to and from the conference room.*

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 28, 2004.

Robert Zoldos,

FAA System Engineer, RTCA Advisory Committee.

[FR Doc. 04-22614 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 4.1287 Action by administrative law judge. ( a ) Upon completion of the hearing and the incorporation of the transcript in the record, the administrative law judge will issue and serve on the parties, as specified by the Board under § 4.415(c)(2): ( 1 ) Proposed findings of fact on the issues presented at the hearing;
( 2 ) A recommended decision that includes findings of fact and conclusions of law and that advises the parties of their right to file exceptions under paragraph (c) of this section; or
( 3 ) A decision that will be final for the Department unless a notice of appeal is filed in accordance with § 4.411.
( b ) The administrative law judge will promptly send to the Board the record and: ( 1 ) The proposed findings;
( 2 ) The recommended decision; or
( 3 ) The final decision if a timely notice of appeal is filed.
( c ) The parties will have 30 days from service of the recommended decision to file exceptions with the Board.
[75 FR 64669, Oct. 20, 2010]
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE01756

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
**UNITED STA TES ENVIRONMENTA**  **L PROTECTION A GENCY**  NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION February 12 , 2015 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: V ocational Vehicle Drive Cy cle Data: Draft R eport produced b y the National

R enewable Energy

L aboratory

entitled “The Development of Vocational Vehicle Drive Cy cles and Segmentation” FROM: Lauren Steele , Environmental Engineer, OTAQ/ASD TO: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heav y - Dut y Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2 - Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 201 4 - 0827 **Int roduction**  Attached to this memo is a draft report produced under the direction of EPA by the National Renewable Energy L aboratory

(NREL) under Interagency Agreement IAG - 14 - 1954 and Task Number WFGY.1000. Also attached is a set of Powerpoint slides summarizing the progress of the NREL work and offering a brief overview of the vocational vehicle Phase 2 program as of December 2015. The report describes the methodology and results of NREL’s vocational drive cy cle anal ys is. The vehicles included in the Fleet DNA database have been grouped into re presentative segments via drive cy cle anal ys is, and membership in segments has been correlate d with vehicle chassis characteristics . In proposed rulemaking, the ARB Transient cy cle was combined wi th the 55 mph cruise cy cle with road grade, the 65 mph cruise cycle with road grade, and a 10 - minute idle cy cle to create a 4 - part composite cy cle. As a part of NREL’s work, for each segment of vocational vehicles appropriate weightings were assigned to e ach constituent test cycle to ensure that the overall (composite weighted) cy cle reasonably represents the activity

of most vehicles in each segment.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1353
JAMES A. HILFIGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusTRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-96-848-2) Argued: October 2, 1997 Decided: December 18, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HERLONG, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ARGUED: Conrad Moss Shumadine, WILCOX & SAVAGE, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Edwin Ford Stephens, CHRISTIAN & BARTON, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: John F. Rixey, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: The Virginia Supreme Court having answered our Certification Order, the grant of summary judgment in favor of Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company is

AFFIRMED .
#### § 429.25 How long do I have to submit my payment for the use fee and accept the offered use authorization?

You have 90 days to accept and return the use authorization and required fees, otherwise Reclamation may consider the offer to be rejected by you and your file may be closed. If this occurs and you later wish to proceed, you must submit a new application and another $100 nonrefundable application fee. You may not commence your use of Reclamation's land, facilities, or waterbodies until Reclamation has issued a use authorization to you. A use authorization will only be issued upon receipt by Reclamation of all required costs and fees, and the use authorization signed by you.
#### § 3581.4-1 Lease terms.

The lease shall be issued for a period of 20 years with a preference right in the lessee to renew for a 10-year term at the end of the initial term and at the end of each 10-year period thereafter.

[51 FR 15213, Apr. 22, 1986; 51 FR 25204, July 11, 1986]
#### Charles E. Riordan, as Ancillary Administrator D. B. N. C. T. A. of John J. Riordan, Jr., Deceased, Appellant, v. Josephine H. Crabtree et al., Respondents.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, judgment granted in favor of defendants, after trial before an official referee, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 801.] ,
#### § 4.1300 Scope.

These regulations govern administrative review of proposed individual civil penalty assessments under section 518(f) of the Act against a director, officer, or agent of a corporation.
1 

### Damberg, Rich

From: Brachtl, Megan

Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 4:20 PM

To: Damberg, Rich

Subject: FW: PM2.5 NAAQS SIP NPRM: Additional Interagency Comments

Incoming #3

Megan V. Brachtl, Group Leader

State and Local Programs Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(919) 541

‐ 2648

brachtl.megan@epa.gov

From: Szabo, Aaron [mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 4:27 PM

To: Ling, Michael; Brachtl, Megan

Subject: PM2.5 NAAQS SIP NPRM: Additional Interagency Comments

Based on our interagency discussion, below is the language provided by the reviewer as comment:

Section IX.B.1.d. Insert the following after “In the December 2012 PM NAAQS final rule the EPA established a new

health

‐ based primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS of 12.0 μ g/m3. In that same action the EPA retained the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS of 15.0 μ g/m3 as a secondary NAAQS to protect against certain welfare effects.”

“In the 1997 PM2.5 designation rule (70 FR 944), EPA designated areas nonattainment under both the primary and

secondary 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS which were identical. Designations for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS made in January 2015 (80

FR 2206) designated areas under the 2012 PM2.5 primary standard and did not “redesignate” areas for the 1997 PM2.5

secondary standard. Therefore, at this time, all areas designated nonattainment in 2005 for the 1997 PM2.5 standard

are considered as having been designated nonattainment for the 1997 PM2.5 primary NAAQS and for the 1997 PM2.5

secondary NAAQS where such distinctions are made below. Similarly, any 1997 PM2.5 nonattainment areas that have

approved redesignation requests for attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, the redesignation applies to both the

primary and second 1997 PM2.5 standards.”

Aaron L. Szabo

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

202

‐ 395

‐ 3621

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1928
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              111
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1928
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    88
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (30)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (30)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (30)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)


</TABLE>