alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 417.3 Notice of recommendations and determinations.

Following consultation with each Contractor and after consideration of all relevant comments and suggestions advanced by the Contractors in such consultations, the Regional Director will formulate his recommendations and determinations relating to the matters specified in § 417.2. The recommendations and determinations shall, with respect to each Contractor, be based upon but not necessarily limited to such factors as the area to be irrigated, climatic conditions, location, land classifications, the kinds of crops raised, cropping practices, the type of irrigation system in use, the condition of water carriage and distribution facilities, record of water orders, and rejections of ordered water, general operating practices, the operating efficiencies and methods of irrigation of the water users, amount and rate of return flows to the river, municipal water requirements and the pertinent provisions of the Contractor's Boulder Canyon Project Act water delivery contract. The Regional Director shall give each Contractor written notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, of his recommendations and determinations. If the recommendations and determinations include a reduction in the amount of water to be delivered, as compared to the calendar year immediately preceding, the notice shall be delivered to the Contractor or timely sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, so that it may reasonably be delivered at least 30 days prior to the first date water delivery would be affected thereby, and shall specify the basis for such reduction including any pertinent factual determinations. The recommendations and determinations of the Regional Director shall be final and conclusive unless, within 30 days of the date of receipt of the notice, the Contractor submits his written comments and objections to the Regional Director and requests further consultation. If, after such further consultation, timely taken, the Regional Director does not modify his recommendations and determinations and so advises the Contractor in writing, or if modifications are made but the Contractor still feels aggrieved thereby after notification in writing of such modified recommendations and determinations, the Contractor may, before 30 days after receipt of said notice, appeal to the Secretary of the Interior. During the pendency of such appeal, and until disposition thereof by the Secretary, the recommendations and determinations formulated by the Regional Director shall be of no force or effect. In the event delivery of water is scheduled prior to the new recommendations and determinations becoming final, said delivery shall be made according to the Contractor's currently proposed schedule or to the schedules approved for the previous calendar year, whichever is less.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

#### Rate the Lesson Plan

## Field Trips

# Don’t Get Sedimental: Runoff and Sediment in the River

Catoctin Mountain Park, Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Historical Park, Fredericksburg & Spotsylvania National Military Park, George Washington Memorial Parkway, Greenbelt ParkHarpers Ferry National Historical Park, Manassas National Battlefield Park, Monocacy National Battlefield, Prince William Forest Park, Richmond National Battlefield Park, Rock Creek Park*more »*

                      Grade Level:
High School: Ninth Grade through Twelfth Grade

                      - Subject:
                      - Science

Students will determine a National Park’s stream habitat rating based upon abiotic, biotic, and cultural factors. Prior to the field study students explore cultural eutrophication, land use and impact on the watershed over time. After the field study students analyze and report their real-time data, reflect on their park experience, and assess their group’s performance. Finally students apply their gained knowledge and comprehension to a real scenario in the watershed. Students are encouraged to use their field experience to engage in a service project such as joining a local stream monitoring group to examine the health of area streams.This field trip is part of the Bridging the Watershed (BTW) curriculum program. BTW is an outreach program of the Alice Ferguson Foundation, in partnership with the National Park Service (NPS) and area schools, designed to promote student academic achievement, personal connections with the natural world, lifelong civic engagement, and environmental stewardship through hands-on curriculum-based outdoor studies in national parks and public lands.For more information on participating in this field study, contact the BTW program.  

**Tags: **bridging the watershedsedimentationstreams

## Lesson Plans

Last updated: September 12, 2021

----

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the Interior

          -  Accessibility 
          -  Privacy Policy 
          -  FOIA 
          -  Notices 
          -  Contact The National Park Service 
          -  NPS FAQ 
          -  No Fear Act 
          -  Disclaimer 
          -  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 
          -  USA.gov 
          -  Facebook 
          -  Youtube 
          -  Twitter 
          -  Instagram 
          -  Flickr
(c) In the event that the California State Water Resources Board or a court of 

competent jurisdiction issues a final decision or order modifying the terms and conditions 

of the water rights of either party to this Settlement Contract in order to impose BayDelta water quality obligations, the Contractor and the United States shall promptly meet 

to determine whether or not to modify any of the terms of this Settlement Contract to 

comply with the final decision or order. If within 60 days of the date of the issuance of 

the final decision or order the parties are not able to reach agreement regarding either the 

need to modify this Settlement Contract or the manner in which this Settlement Contract 

is to be modified, the parties shall promptly retain a neutral mediator, experienced in 

resolving water right disputes, to assist the parties in resolving their dispute. The cost of 

the mediator shall be shared equally. In the event that either of the parties to this 

Settlement Contract determines that the parties will not be able to develop mutuallyagreeable modification(s) to this Settlement Contract even with the assistance of a 

mediator, either of the parties to this Settlement Contract may attempt to resolve the 

impasse by seeking appropriate judicial relief including, but not limited to, filing a 

general adjudication of the rights to the use of water in the Sacramento River system. 

The foregoing provisions of this sub-article shall only apply to the incremental 

obligations contained within a final decision or order of the State Water Resources 

Control Board that reflects a modification to the obligations imposed in State Water 

Resources Control Board Revised Water Rights Decision 1641 dated March 15, 2000, 

and its associated 1995 Water Quality Control Plan which, taken together, will be 

considered the baseline for the application of the provisions of this sub-article. In the 

event of an adjustment to the Contractor’s Base Supply pursuant to this sub-article, the 
 2 

Contracting Officer will not assess any charge for the rescheduling of Base Supply as 

would otherwise be required under the provisions of Article 3(c) of this Settlement 

Contract.
§ 4.1032 When must a party supplement or amend information? ( a ) *Witnesses and exhibits.* ( 1 ) Each party must file an updated version of the list of witnesses and exhibits required under 25 CFR 83.38(a)(2), § 4.1021(b)(3), or § 4.1030 by no later than 15 days prior to the hearing date, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ.
( 2 ) If a party wishes to include any new witness or exhibit on its updated list, it must provide an explanation of why it was not feasible for the party to include the witness or exhibit on its list under 25 CFR 83.38(a)(2), § 4.1021(b)(3), or § 4.1030.
( b ) *Failure to disclose.* ( 1 ) A party that fails to disclose information required under 25 CFR 83.38(a)(2), § 4.1021(b)(3), § 4.1030, or paragraph (a)(1) of this section will not be permitted to introduce as evidence at the hearing testimony from a witness or other information that it failed to disclose.
( 2 ) Paragraph (b)(1) of this section does not apply if the failure to disclose was substantially justified or is harmless.
( 3 ) Before or during the hearing, a party may object under paragraph (b)(1) of this section to the admission of evidence.
( 4 ) The ALJ will consider the following in determining whether to exclude evidence under paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section: ( i ) The prejudice to the objecting party;
( ii ) The ability of the objecting party to cure any prejudice;
( iii ) The extent to which presentation of the evidence would disrupt the orderly and efficient hearing of the case;
( iv ) The importance of the evidence; and
( v ) The reason for the failure to disclose, including any bad faith or willfulness regarding the failure.
#### § 3584.3 Other applicable regulations.

Subject to regulations in this subpart, the regulations in parts 3500, 3510, 3520, 3530, 3540, 3550 and 3560 of this title shall govern the leasing of all leasable and hardrock minerals within the area.

[51 FR 15213, Apr. 22, 1986; 51 FR 25205, July 11, 1986]
#### Charles H. Armsted, Respondent, v. Emery A. Robinson, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and case remit*932ted to the County Court to pass upon the appeal, upon the authority of *Sperry*v. *Reynolds*(65 N. Y. 179). All concurred.
#### § 4610.1 Evidence of ownership.

Parties offering to lease lands to the United States under the provisions of this Act will be required to furnish evidence of ownership as follows:
#### § 3835.91 What if I fail to file annual FLPMA documents?

If you fail to file an annual FLPMA document by December 30, as required in § 3835.31(d), you forfeit the affected mining claims or sites.
§ 3838.13 What restrictions are there on submitting a NOITL on SRHA lands? ( a ) At any one time, you or your affiliates may not hold NOITLs for more than 1,280 acres of land owned by a single surface owner in any one state.
( b ) At any one time, you or your affiliates may not hold NOITLs for more than 6,400 acres of land in any one state.
( c ) Your NOITL will expire 90 days after you submit it with BLM, unless you submit to BLM a plan of operations that complies with part 3809 of this chapter within the 90-day period.
( d ) After your NOITL expires, you are not allowed to submit another NOITL for the same lands until 30 days after the expiration of the previously-filed NOITL.
( e ) Only those persons whose names are listed on the properly-submitted NOITL, or their agents, will be allowed to explore for minerals or locate mining claims or tunnel sites on the lands covered by the NOITL.
( f ) For purposes of this section, the term “affiliates” means, with respect to any person, any other person which controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such person.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign and Test of an Improved Crashworthiness Small Composite AirframeThe purpose of this small business innovative research (SBIR) program was to evaluate the feasibility of developing small composite airplanes with improved crashworthiness. A combination of analysis and half scale component tests were used to develop an energy absorbing airframe. Four full scale crash tests were conducted at the NASA Impact Dynamics Research Facility, two on a hard surface and two onto soft soil, replicating earlier NASA tests of production general aviation airplanes. Several seat designs and restraint systems including both an air bag and load limiting shoulder harnesses were tested. Tests showed that occupant loads were within survivable limits with the improved structural design and the proper combination of seats and restraint systems. There was no loss of cabin volume during the events. The analysis method developed provided design guidance but time did not allow extending the analysis to soft soil impact. This project demonstrated that survivability improvements are possible with modest weight penalties. The design methods can be readily applied by airplane designers using the examples in this report.Document ID20020068132Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTerry, James E.*(Terry Engineering Andover, KS United States)*Hooper, Steven J.*(Wichita State Univ. Wichita, KS United States)*Nicholson, Mark*(Wichita State Univ. Wichita, KS United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 2002Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:211774NASA/CR-2002-211774Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 728-50-10-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-20427Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020068132.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32(i)



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-KSB filed by
Crescent Financial Corporation (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 18, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael G. Carlton               
|                     |  |     |  | Michael G. Carlton                   
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



69
§ 3742.3-3 Publication. ( a ) Upon receipt of a Request for Publication and accompanying instruments, if all is found regular, the Authorized officer, or the Director, as may be appropriate, at the expense of the requesting person (who prior to the commencement of publication must furnish the agreement of the publisher to hold such requesting person alone responsible for charges of publication), shall cause notice of the application, offer, permit or lease to be published in a newspaper, to be designated by the Authorized officer, or the Director, as may be appropriate, having general circulation in the county in which the lands involved are situated.
( b ) If such notice is published in a daily paper, it shall be published in the Wednesday issue for 9 consecutive weeks, or, if in a weekly paper, in 9 consecutive issues, or, if in a semi-weekly or tri-weekly paper, in the issue of the same day of each week for 9 consecutive weeks.
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Morton Reed, certify that:  1.   I  have  reviewed  this  amended annual  report  of  LITFUNDING,  Inc.;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a  material  fact  or  omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in  all material respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this report;  4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which  this  report  is  being  prepared;  b)   evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure controls  and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the  end  of  the  period  covered  by  this  report based on such evaluation;  and  c)   disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most  recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the  case  of  an  annual  report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control  over  financial  reporting;  and  5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to  the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):  a)   all significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and  b)   any fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management or other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the registrant's internal  control  over  financial  reporting.    DATED  this  10th day  of  May 2007.   /s/  Morton Reed __________________________ Morton Reed President, Chief  Executive Officer  and Chairman
#### § 3815.7 Mining claims subject to stock driveway withdrawals.

Mining claims on lands within stock driveway withdrawals, located prior to May 4, 1929, and subsequent to the date of the withdrawal, may be held and perfected subject to the provisions and regulations in this section.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,198.16

 1,198.07

 1,198.29

 1,198.50

 1,198.62

 1,198.74

 1,198.91

 1,199.04

 1,199.18

 1,199.31

 1,199.31

 1,199.31

 1,199.35

 1,199.54

 1,199.80

 1,200.11

 1,200.54

 1,200.97

 1,201.24

 1,201.65

 1,202.41

 1,203.08

 1,203.72

 1,204.46

 1,205.11

 1,205.69

 1,206.64

 1,207.40

 1,207.88

 1,208.35

 204.7

 204.4

 205.1

 205.7

 206.0

 206.4

 206.9

 207.3

 207.7

 208.1

 208.1

 208.1

 208.2

 208.8

 209.5

 210.5

 211.7

 213.0

 213.8

 215.1

 217.4

 219.4

 221.4

 223.7

 225.7

 227.5

 230.4

 232.8

 234.3

 235.8

STORAGE

-0.2

-0.3

+0.6

+0.6

+0.4

+0.4

+0.5

+0.4

+0.4

+0.4

+0.0

+0.0

+0.1

+0.6

+0.8

+0.9

+1.3

+1.3

+0.8

+1.2

+2.3

+2.0

+2.0

+2.3

+2.0

+1.8

+3.0

+2.4

+1.5

+1.5

CHANGE

87

84

533

518

392

376

451

392

415

400

205

237

288

490

593

673

860

860

625

837

1,371

1,238

1,203

1,350

1,213

1,119

1,709

1,418

976

964

INFLOW

 15

 26

 14

 15

 14

 14

 16

 16

 16

 14

 14

 20

 19

 14

 14

 15

 17

 16

 20

 16

 14

 14

 16

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

PP

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 181

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 183

 183

 183

 183

 183

 183

 183

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

 182

OUTLETS

 10

 10

 10

 9

 18

 2

 0

 0

 7

 9

 9

 35

 27

 10

 8

 11

 11

 12

 12

 14

 13

 14

 16

 6

 5

 14

 17

 18

 17

 16

C.F.S.

 .11

 .12

 .11

 .10

 .21

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .10

 .10

 .40

 .31

 .11

 .09

 .12

 .13

 .14

 .14

 .16

 .15

 .16

 .18

 .07

 .06

 .15

 .18

 .19

 .18

 .17

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2015 WHISKEYTOWN LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2015

IN LAKE

EVAP.

C.F.S. * FRANCIS

COMPUTED

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +31.0 21,877 5,466 0 467 360 4.04

ACRE-FEET +31.0 43,393 10,842 0 926 714

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 926

SPILL 0 11,768

 204.9

OUTLET 10,842

TOTAL

JUDGE

CARR PP

(1)

 10

 10

 392

 460

 262

 281

 10

 245

 252

 247

 75

 80

 80

 422

 489

 564

 765

 743

 524

 752

 1,282

 1,161

 1,107

 1,306

 1,149

 1,048

 1,638

 1,351

 934

 898

 18,537

 36,768

FROM

TO

SPRING CR.

TO CLEAR CR

CLEAR

CR.

NATURAL

FLOW

 77

 74

 141

 58

 130

 95

 441

 147

 163

 153

 130

 157

 208

 68

 104

 109

 95

 117

 101

 85

 89

 77

 96

 44

 64

 71

 71

 67

 42

 66

 3,340

 6,625

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 1.21

 .81

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 2.07

PRECIP

INCHES

PRECIPITATION

 2.07

 52.93

THIS MONTH

JULY 1, 2014 TO DATE