alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNeural networks and MIMD-multiprocessorsTwo artificial neural network models are compared. They are the Hopfield Neural Network Model and the Sparse Distributed Memory model. Distributed algorithms for both of them are designed and implemented. The run time characteristics of the algorithms are analyzed theoretically and tested in practice. The storage capacities of the networks are compared. Implementations are done using a distributed multiprocessor system.Document ID19920002479Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsVanhala, Jukka*(Research Inst. for Advanced Computer Science Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Kaski, Kimmo*(Research Inst. for Advanced Computer Science Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1990Subject CategoryComputer SystemsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:188481RIACS-TR-90-9NASA-CR-188481Accession Number92N11697Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-387Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920002479.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Henry Leerburger v. Henry R. C. Watson, Executor, etc.

Motion granted and proceedings under the order stayed, upon plaintiff’s giving a bond in the penalty of $18,000 for the payment of the amount to be paid by him according to the judgment for the specific performance of his contract within ten days after the affirmance of the order, if the order appealed from is affirmed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Rashun Deonta Williams, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00192

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Red River County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR02883 ).
Memorandum Opinion delive red by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court ’ s judgment to show that Williams entered

pleas of true to the State’s drug

- related allegations that the trial court found were true. As

modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Rashun Deonta Williams, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 28, 2020
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 36.12 Temporary access. ( a ) For the purposes of this section, the term: ( 1 ) *Area* also includes public lands administered by the BLM designated as wilderness study areas or managed to maintain the wilderness character or potential thereof, and the National Petroleum Reserve—Alaska.
( 2 ) *Temporary access* means limited, short-term (i.e., up to one year from issuance of the permit) access which does not require permanent facilities for access to State or private lands.
( b ) This section is applicable to State and private landowners who desire temporary access across an area for the purposes of survey, geophysical, exploratory and other temporary uses of such non-federal lands, and where such temporary access is not affirmatively provided for in §§ 36.10 and 36.11. State and private landowners meeting the criteria of § 36.10(b) are directed to use the procedures of § 36.10 to obtain temporary access.
( c ) A landowner requiring temporary access across an area for survey, geophysical, exploratory or similar temporary activities shall apply to the appropriate Federal agency for an access permit by providing the relevant information requested in the SF 299.
( d ) The appropriate Federal agency shall grant the desired temporary access whenever it is determined, after compliance with the requirements of NEPA, that such access will not result in permanent harm to the area's resources. The area manager shall include in any permit granted such stipulations and conditions on temporary access as are necessary to ensure that the access granted would not be inconsistent with the purposes for which the area was established and to ensure that no permanent harm will result to the area's resources and section 810 of ANILCA is complied with.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 MIAMI DIVISION 

 Case No. 20-22106-cv-DPG 

FLORIDA FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

DEERPATH ON THE LAKE, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

____________________________________/ 

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS 

and CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Defendants, DEERPATH ON THE LAKE LLC, through undersigned counsel hereby files 

this Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement which lists the persons, 

associated persons, firms, partnerships or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome 

of this case: 

A. The name of each person, attorney, association of persons, firm, law firm, 

partnership, and corporation that has or may have an interest in the outcome of this 

action including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporation, publiclytraded companies that own 10% or more of a party's stock, and all other identifiable 

legal entities related to any party in the case: 

 1. Plaintiff Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. 

 2. Ryan Turizo 

 3. Plaintiff’s counsel, Jibrael S. Hindi, Esq. 

 4. Deerpath on the Lake LLC 

 5. J.R.D. Management, Corp. 

 6. Maxx Deerpath LLC. 

 7. Defendants’ counsel, Langbein & Langbein, P.A. 

Case 1:20-cv-22106-DPG Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

B. The name of every other entity whose publicly-traded stock, equity, or debt may be 

substantially affected by the outcome of the proceedings: 

 None known. 

C. The name of every other entity which is likely to be an active participant in the 

proceedings, including the debtor and members of the creditors' committee (or 

twenty largest unsecured creditors) in bankruptcy cases: 

 .Hanover Insurance, carrier for JRD Management LLC 

D. The name of each victim (individual or corporate) of civil and criminal conduct 

alleged to be wronged including every person who may be entitled to restitution: 

 Plaintiff per the allegations of its Complaint. 

 I hereby certify that I am unaware of any actual or potential conflict of interest involving 

the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to this case, and will immediately notify the Court 

in writing on learning of any such conflict. 

 Date June 30, 2020. 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 LANGBEIN & LANGBEIN, P.A. 

 Counsel for the Defendants 

 7480 Fairway Drive, Suite 209 

 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 

 Tel: (305) 556-3663 

 Fax: (305) 556-3647 

 Email: langbeinpa@bellsouth.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically on June 30, 

2020 through CM/ECF and that a copy of the foregoing will be served via notification through 

CM/ECF on all counsel or parties of record on the attached service list: 

 By: /s/ Leslie W. Langbein 

 Leslie W. Langbein, Esq. 

 Fla. Bar No. 305391 

Case 1:20-cv-22106-DPG Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,246.68

 2,246.26

 2,245.86

 2,245.47

 2,245.08

 2,244.67

 2,244.23

 2,243.87

 2,243.63

 2,243.19

 2,242.82

 2,242.49

 2,242.09

 2,241.72

 2,241.35

 2,240.96

 2,240.54

 2,240.14

 2,239.71

 2,239.29

 2,238.90

 2,238.44

 2,237.95

 2,237.46

 2,236.98

 2,236.47

 2,236.01

 2,235.54

 2,235.07

 2,234.60

 2,234.11

 926.8

 923.3

 919.9

 916.7

 913.4

 910.0

 906.3

 903.3

 901.4

 897.7

 894.7

 892.0

 888.7

 885.6

 882.6

 879.5

 876.0

 872.8

 869.3

 866.0

 862.8

 859.1

 855.2

 851.3

 847.5

 843.5

 839.8

 836.2

 832.5

 828.8

 825.0

STORAGE

-3.4

-3.5

-3.4

-3.3

-3.3

-3.4

-3.7

-3.0

-2.0

-3.6

-3.0

-2.7

-3.3

-3.0

-3.0

-3.2

-3.4

-3.2

-3.5

-3.4

-3.1

-3.7

-3.9

-3.9

-3.8

-4.0

-3.6

-3.7

-3.7

-3.7

-3.8

CHANGE

142

245

142

152

150

96

71

311

746

-141

173

153

90

201

256

180

110

176

102

129

188

72

56

-83

108

-49

157

179

167

139

122

INFLOW

 1,765

 1,930

 1,743

 1,730

 1,699

 1,732

 1,858

 1,734

 1,624

 1,683

 1,664

 1,463

 1,698

 1,655

 1,706

 1,718

 1,754

 1,727

 1,759

 1,762

 1,679

 1,703

 1,774

 1,614

 1,771

 1,662

 1,787

 1,771

 1,762

 1,711

 1,809

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 161

 185

 204

 185

 244

 123

 187

 187

 200

 187

OUTLET

 79

 99

 94

 69

 98

 86

 59

 83

 122

 10

 46

 56

 48

 70

 72

 65

 72

 83

 92

 73

 90

 64

 73

 63

 75

 77

 79

 81

 78

 78

 53

C.F.S.

 .32

 .40

 .38

 .28

 .40

 .35

 .24

 .34

 .50

 .04

 .19

 .23

 .20

 .29

 .30

 .27

 .30

 .35

 .39

 .31

 .38

 .27

 .31

 .27

 .32

 .33

 .34

 .35

 .34

 .34

 .23

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 1.84

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2015 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 18, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -105.2 4,540 53,447 0 1,863 2,287 9.56 2.03

ACRE-FEET -105,200 9,005 106,012 0 3,695 4,536

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 106,012

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 3,695

 109,707

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.03

JULY 1, 2015 2.03

 930.2

Table 4

(1) (1)
**Consent of Independent  Registered Public Accounting Firm**

  The board of directors Statoil ASA

 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333 168426) on Form S-8  of Statoil ASA and  the registration statement (No. 333-188327) on Form F-3 of Statoil ASA and Statoil Petroleum AS of our reports dated 10 March 2015, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2014, which reports appear in the 31 December 2014 annual report on Form 20-F of Statoil ASA. The audit report covering the 31 December 2014 financial statements refers to changes in the policy for the presentation of natural gas sales, and related expenditure, on behalf of the Norwegian state made by Statoil subsidiaries in their own name, as well as changes in the policy for the recognition of income tax positions for which payment has been made despite Statoil disputing the tax claim involved.

 /s/ KPMG AS 

 

Stavanger, Norway  19 March 2015
#### § 4110.2-4 Allotments.

After consultation, cooperation, and coordination with the affected grazing permittees or lessees and the state having lands or responsibility for managing resources within the area, the authorized officer may designate and adjust grazing allotment boundaries. The authorized officer may combine or divide allotments, through an agreement or by decision, when necessary for the proper and efficient management of public rangelands.

[71 FR 39504, July 12, 2006]
#### § 41.200 Application.

Except as provided in §§ 41.205 through 41.235(a), these Title IX regulations apply to every recipient and to each education program or activity operated by such recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2018 (the Form 10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2018



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ NICOLE SCHALTENBRAND
|Nicole Schaltenbrand    
|Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [NM-910-05-1020-PH]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, New Mexico Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

# DATES:

The meeting dates are November 9-10, 2004, at the Drury Inn, 4310 The 25 Way Northeast, Albuquerque, NM. An optional field trip is planned for Monday, November 8, 2004. The public comment period is scheduled for November 8, 2004, from 6-7 p.m. at the Drury Inn. The public may present written comments to the RAC. Depending on the number of individuals wishing to comment and time available, oral comments may be limited. The three established RAC working groups may have a late afternoon or an evening meeting on Tuesday, November 9, 2004.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The 15-member RAC advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in New Mexico. All meetings are open to the public. At this meeting, topics include issues on renewable and nonrenewable resources.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Theresa Herrera, New Mexico State Office, Office of External Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, PO Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502-0115, (505) 438-7517.

Dated: October 1, 2004.

Linda S.C. Rundell,

State Director.

[FR Doc. 04-22555  Filed 10-6-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
#### William N. Besant, Respondent, v. Peter Lutz, Appellant.

Judgement of the County Court of Westchester county affirmed by default, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Robert S. Braswell IV, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Health Discovery
Corporation formerly Direct Wireless Communications Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process,



<PAGE>

summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ Robert S. Braswell IV
--------------------------------
Robert S. Braswell IV
Chief Administrative Officer
#### Peter Nichols, Respondent, *v.*Peter Voorhis et al., Appellants.

An action to vacate and set aside an assessment, which is an apparent lien apon real property, is not an action “ affecting the title to real property or an interest therein,” within the meaning of the amendment of 1874 to section 11 of the Code (chap. 322, Laws of 1874) limiting *appeals;*and *29where the subject in controversy in such an action is less than $500 it is not appealable.

To take a case out of the limitation it is not sufficient that the action relates to real property or in some way affects it j it must itself affect the title or an interest therein.

(Argued March 27, 1878;

decided May 21, 1878.)

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order reversing a judgment in favor of defendants, which was entered upon an order sustaining demurrers to plaintiff's complaint. (Reported below, 9 Hun, 171.)

This action was brought to vacate and set aside an assessment of $435.94 upon certain lands of plaintiff for a highway improvement as a cloud on title, and to restrain the ' enforcement thereof. Defendants separately demurred to the complaint.

*Sam’l J. Crooks,*for appellants.

*C. P.*Hoffman, for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

This case is not appealable to this court, for the reason that the amount in controversy is less than $500. The assessment complained of is only $435.94.

Unless, therefore, the action is one “affecting the title to real property or an interest therein,” the appeal was unauthorized. (Laws of 1874, chap. 322.)

It is not sufficient that the action relates to real property or in some way affects it; it must itself affect the title oían interest therein. An action to recover the possession of real property, or to set aside or to compel a conveyance thereof or for the partition thereof, is of the latter description. An action for an injury thereto or to foreclose a lien thereon is of the former description. *(Wheeler*v. Scofield, 67 N. Y., 311.) This is not an action to impose an assessment, but to have one declared void. The sole object is to procure an adjudication that an assessment which is an appa*30rent lien upon real property is not a lien. The action does not affect, destroy, determine or change any title.

If the final judgment in such an action declares the assessment to be void, it in no way affects the title to real property or an interest therein. If it declares the assessment to be valid, the same is true, because the validity of the assessment is then due, not to the judgment, but to the proceedings in which it was imposed.

If this could be said to be an action affecting the title to real property or an interest therein, the same could be said of every action in which a judgment is sought which will be a lien upon real property, and under which such property could be seized and sold.

We have, therefore, no jurisdiction of this appeal, and it must be dismissed with costs without any discussion of the merits involved.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 4.1203 Application for temporary relief from alleged discriminatory acts. ( a ) On or after 10 days from the filing of an application for review under this part, any party may file an application for temporary relief from alleged discriminatory acts.
( b ) The application shall be filed in the Hearings Division, OHA.
( c ) The application shall include— ( 1 ) A detailed written statement setting forth the reasons why relief should be granted;
( 2 ) A showing that the complaint of discrimination was not frivolously brought;
( 3 ) A description of any exigent circumstances justifying temporary relief; and
( 4 ) A statement of the specific relief requested.
( d ) All parties to the proceeding to which the application relates shall have 5 days from receipt of the application to file a written response.
( e ) The administrative law judge may convene a hearing on any issue raised by the application if he deems it appropriate.
( f ) The administrative law judge shall expeditiously issue an order or decision granting or denying such relief.
( g ) If all parties consent, before or after the commencement of any hearing on the application for temporary relief, the administrative law judge may order the hearing on the application for review of alleged discriminatory - acts to be advanced and consolidated with the hearing on the application for temporary relief.
[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 88 FR 5795, Jan. 30, 2023]