2014 2015 Variance

(2015 rate - Percent Explanation of significant decr

Rates Rates 2014 rate) Change cost

StorageBlack Butte Reservoir 828,690 975,814 147,124 17.75% CORE facilities cost increase and decreBuchanan Reservoir 590,064 417,524 (172,540) -29.24% determined.Columbia-Mowry System 163,113 167,229 4,116 2.52%

Coleman National Fish Hatchery 3,015,401 3,076,971 61,570 2.04%

In 2014 Increase in cost was due to remvegetation and road remediation, replaccontrols of gates, lighting system and rereplacement. This work is complete the

Delta Cross Channel 686,456 79,733 (606,723) -88.38% much lower than 2014

Cost increase is due to design and conspump installation. A pump may be need

Folsom Dam & Reservoir 447,534 1,099,147 651,613 145.60% conditions remains in effect. 

Folsom Pumping Plant 411,580 411,968 388 0.09%Friant Dam & Reservoir 1,389,656 1,398,541 8,885 0.64%

Gianelli, WR PGP 2,939,402 2,727,778 (211,624) -7.20%

Due to more releases from the San Luis 

Less: Gianelli Credit (2,331,465) (2,587,893) (256,428) 11.00% credit has increased significantly from pHidden Reservoir 264,720 194,806 (69,914) -26.41%Hill, CA Whiskeytown Dam 247,861 254,928 7,067 2.85%

New Melones Dam & Reservoir 977,455 939,574 (37,881) -3.88%

Last year claim team inspected the dam 

Nimbus dam requires repair of 18 spill gperform above repair Bureau cost increGoing forward this cost has been treate

Nimbus Dam & Reservoir 1,010,810 169,857 (840,953) -83.20% will be recovered under PL 111-11.

Sacramento River 622,652 834,314 211,662 33.99%

San Joaquin River 118,450 118,400 (50) -0.04%

Security Costs 3,188,905 3,388,683 199,778 6.26%Shasta Dam & Reservoir 1,408,752 1,454,942 46,190 3.28%

Sisk, BF San Luis Dam 4,217,001 4,029,491 (187,510) -4.45%Trinity Dam & Reservoir 92,628 95,317 2,689 2.90%Water Forum - American River Division - 64,358 64,358 100.00%

The overall decrease is majorly due to N

 Total Storage 20,289,665 19,311,482 (978,183) -4.82% cross Channel.

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

FY 2014 vs. FY 2015 O&M COST ESTIMATE ANALYSIS

IRRIGATION
2014 2015 Variance

(2015 rate - Percent Explanation of significant decr

Rates Rates 2014 rate) Change cost

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

FY 2014 vs. FY 2015 O&M COST ESTIMATE ANALYSIS

IRRIGATION

ConveyanceDelta Barriers - Unfunded 2,773,545 - (2,773,545) 100.00% No unfunded needs for delta barriers as 

Delta-Mendota Canal 28,375 - (28,375) -100.00%

DMC Regulatory Actions - 101,541 101,541 100.00%Hydrologic operating Modeling - 

Delta Division - 19,113 19,113 100.00%

Water Wheeling Cost -Unfunded 1,386,772 - (1,386,772) 100.00% No unfunded needs for delta barriers as DMC Subsidence Study - 5,000 5,000 100.00%Friant-Kern Canal 32,469 69,667 37,198 114.56%Los Banos Creek Detention Dam - Maint. Joint - 5,927 5,927 100.00%Madera Canal - 13,000 13,000 100.00%

Red Bluff Diversion Dam 36,657 - (36,657) -100.00%San Luis Canal 11,711 - (11,711) -100.00%Tehama-Colusa Canal 83,982 85,625 1,643 1.96%TCC Fish Facilities 6,574 - (6,574) -100.00%

Prior year Delta barrier cost was includecompare to this year. Bureau has not yeunfunded need for 2015. Budget is work

 Total 4,360,085 299,873 (1,286,667) -93.12% and will let us know before final rate. If fLess Direct billed (199,768) (299,873) (100,105) 50.11% 2015; amount will be included in final ra

 Net Conveyance Cost 4,160,317 - (1,386,772) -100.00% disclose in forward. 

Conveyance PumpingCorning Pumping Plant 181,261 195,975 14,714 8.12%

Dos Amigos Pumping Plant 2,593,867 2,126,195 (467,672) -18.03%

O'Neill Pump Gen Plant - Federal 1,271,274 1,086,386 (184,888) -14.54%

Jones Pumping Plant 10,803,892 10,463,187 (340,705) -3.15% Total Conveyance Pumping 14,850,294 13,871,743 (978,551) -6.59% Less: Direct Billed (13,871,743) (14,850,294) 978,551 Net Reimbursable Conveyance Pumpin - - - Cost is directly billed to contactors.Conveyance & DrainageKesterson Reservoir 175,000 - (175,000) -100.00% No cost has been reported by budget fo
2014 2015 Variance

(2015 rate - Percent Explanation of significant decr

Rates Rates 2014 rate) Change cost

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

FY 2014 vs. FY 2015 O&M COST ESTIMATE ANALYSIS

IRRIGATION

Direct Pumping CostCorning CanalCorning WD Canalside Relift - Power 49,971 69,287 19,316 38.65%

Proberta WD Canalside Relift - Power 3,112 4,287 1,175 37.76%Cow Creek UnitWintu-Cow Creek PP - Power/Bella Vista 58,946 74,340 15,394 26.12%

Contra Costa CanalContra Costa PP (Contra Costa WD)Cross Valley Canal Dos Amigos PP and Banks 193,003 309,960 116,957 60.60%

San Felipe UnitSan Benito County WD Gianelli, WR PGP 96,346 95,115 (1,231) -1.28%

 Pacheco PP - Power 64,564 126,650 62,086 96.16%

Santa Clara Valley WD Coyote PP - Power 17,039 31,839 14,800 86.86%

 Gianelli, WR PGP 93,494 100,599 7,105 7.60%

 Pacheco PP - Power 62,653 133,952 71,299 113.80%San Luis Canal - FresnoPleasant Valley Relifts 479,185 432,940 (46,245) -9.65%

Westlands WD Relifts 2,230,776 2,246,320 15,544 0.70%

San Luis Canal - TracyPanoche WD Canalside Relift - Power 754 959 205 27.19%San Luis WD Canalside Relift - Power 441,193 573,580 132,387 30.01%

Tehama-Colusa CanalColusa County WD 230,675 332,173 101,498 44.00%

Dunnigan WD Canalside Relift - Power 3,626 5,470 1,844 50.85%Westside WD/GV WD Canalside Relift - 13,327 21,018 7,691 57.71%

Kanawha WD Canalside Relift 35,619 52,855 17,236 48.39%

Orland-Artois WD Canalside Relift 47,138 77,258 30,120 63.90%

More the contractors’ pump higher the cshift to CVP customers through cost sub Moreover, California Independent Systecharges for scheduling Reclamation’s loboundaries have also increase with com

 Total Direct Pumping Cost 4,121,421 4,688,602 567,181 13.76% another reason of cost increase.
2014 2015 Variance

(2015 rate - Percent Explanation of significant decr

Rates Rates 2014 rate) Change cost

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

FY 2014 vs. FY 2015 O&M COST ESTIMATE ANALYSIS

IRRIGATION

Water Marketing ExpenseSuisun Marsh Protection 641,773 664,774 23,001 3.58%

 Water Contract Administration 7,660,306 6,893,395 (766,911) -10.01%

 Water and Power Systems Controls 4,728,612 5,527,392 798,780 16.89%

 Other Expenses/Hazardous Material Ma 3,696,935 3,887,021 190,086 5.14%Hazardous Material Management Progra 441,321 439,047 (2,274) -0.52%

General Expense 1,381,068 1,373,505 (7,563) -0.55%

Non-Permanent Contractor Revenue (94,640) (264,464) (169,824) 179.44%

 Total Water Marketing 18,520,670 18,455,375 65,295 0.35% The overall increase is not significant.Extraordinary O&MStorage 2,182,363 2,057,565 (124,798) -5.72%Conveyance pumping 9,063 601,639 592,576 6538.41%Direct pumping 16,942 203,477 186,535 1101.02%

Cost is related to Nimbus dame radial gtrinity dam fixed wheel gate overhaul an

 Total XO&M 2,208,368 2,862,681 654,313 29.63% and repainting of Keswick power plant.

Total Reimbursable cost for 2015 rates 49,410,146 45,383,435 (4,026,711) -8.15%

Source: Schedule A-9 of the 2014 and 2015 Irrigation Water Ratebooks.