# HOOSIER ENERGY 7398 N. State Road 37 Bloomington, IN 47402



# BASELINE MERCURY TEST CONTINUOUS MERCURY MONITOR VALIDATION REPORT

RATTS GENERATING STATION GENERATING UNIT

## #1

January 

### 18,2007 AQS Project #06712-17-002



## 425 MAIN STREET. EVANSVILLE, IN 47708 OFFICE:(812) 452-4785 • FAX:(812) 452-4786

# BASELINE MERCURY TEST and 

# CONTINUOUS MERClTRY MONITOR VALIDATION REPORT

Conducted at 

# Ratts Generating Station Generating Unit #1

Performed For: 

# HOOSIER

# ENERGY

RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.



# January 18, 2007

Prepared by: 

# rJI-i7j AirOl8lity

# services

Air 

## Quality Services, LLC 425 Main Street Evansville, Indiana 47708

Phone: (812) 452-4785

Fax: (812) 452-4786

, 

## AQS Project 06712-17-002

## TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1
SECTION 2 

## OVERVIEW OF MERCURY TEST PROGRAM 2-1 2.1 Source Description 2-1 2.2 Mercury SaIIlpling Plan 2-2 2.3 Labeling Conventions and Reporting Units 2-2 2.4 Executive Sunnnary : 2-2
SECTION 3 MERCURY STUDY TEST RESULTS 3-1
SECTION 4 FIELD QAJQC 

## 4-1 4.1 Field Practices 4-1 4.2 Simultaneous Field Duplicate Results 4-1 4.3 Field Blanks 4-1
SECTION 5 TEST DATA 5-1 5.1' CEMS Data 5-1 5.2 Hg Trap Results & 

## Data Summary 5-1
SECTION 6 CALCULATED VALVES 6-1 6.1 Mass Emissions**Ca1culations.~** 

## 6-1 6.1.1 Run #1 Mass Emissions , 6-1 6.1.2 Run #3 Mass Emissions 6-2 6.1.3 Run #4 

## Mass Emissions 6-2 6.1.4 Combined Runs Mass Emissions 6-2
SECTION 7 TEST SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND ANAL\'TICAL TEST METHODS 7-1 7.1 Fluegas Absorbent Mercury Speciation (FAMS I'M) 

## Method 7-1 7.2 Flo\J,I Measurements 7-1 7.3 Analytical Test Method 7-3

## Table 2.4 Table 3.1 Table 3.2 Table 4.2 Table 4.3 Table 5.1 Table 5.2

Figure 3.1 Figure 3.2

APPENDIX A

. APPENDIX B LIST 

## OF TABLES Key Results and Statistics 2-3 Total Hg 3-2 Speciated Hg 3-3 Simultaneous Field Duplicate Results 

## .4-1 Field Blank Results 4-1 CEMS Data 5-1 HgTrap Results & Data Summary 5-]

LIST OF FIGURES


## Total Hg 3-2 Speciated Hg 3-3



## APPENDICES
FIELD DATA SHEETS LABORATORY SUMMARY

## SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Air Quality Services, LLC (AQS) conducted a baseline mercury (Rg) and continuous mercury monitor validation test for Hoosier Energy on the Unit 

## #1 coal-burning boiler prestack duct at the Ratts Generating Station located in Petersburg, Indiana. The pUllJose ofthis test was to quantify baseline total mercury emissions as they pertain to the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR), and to compare the speciated mercury results obtained by sorbent tube technologies with the results obtained by a temporarily installed Thenno EnvirOlID1entai Freedom SystemTM Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM). Fluegas sampling was conducted using sorbent tube technology; namely the Fluegas Absorbent Mercury Speciation (FAMSTM) sampling method, that provides speciated mercury results. Collected fluegas samples, along with a field blank sample, were submitted to a 

## dedicated mercury analytical laboratory for digestion and analysis by cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrophotometry (CVAFS) according to the analytical guidelines contained in USEPA Method 

## 1631 Revision E: "Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic FluoJ'escence Spectrometry". AQS test personnel included Chris Wehner (Project Manager) 

## and Neal Stewart. Kyle Foley of Hoosier Energy provided on-site logistics assistance, and coordinated plant operating conditions for the test program. Darrel Bayless ofHoosier Energy coordinated the transfer of CEMS and CMM data, along with general project oversight.
111e contacts for this test program are as follows:
Hoosier Energy 

## Mr. Darrel Bayless 7398 N. State Road 37 P.O. Box 908 Bloomington, IN 47402-0908 Phone: 812-876-0370 dbayless@hepn.com
Air Duality Services. LLC Mr. Dan Todd 

## JSteve Endress 425 Main Street Evansville, IN 47708 Phone: 812-452-4785 Fax: 812-452-4786 dtodd@aqsllc.net 

## Jsendress@aqsllc.net



## 1-1

## SECTION 2 OVERVIE\V OF MERCURY TEST PROGRAM
Effective mercury emissions removal from coal-fired boilers requires a basic understanding of how mercury acts throughout the flue gas stream. The initial source of the mercury, of course, is coal. Mercury typically exists as a trace element in coal on the average order of 0.1 ppl11W, although this concentration varies considerably between coal types. As coal is bumed in large boilers at around 1700o

## K, the mercury in the coal volatilizes to forn'1 themlodynamically favored gaseous elemental mercury (Hg\ In 

## the subsequent cooling of the combustion gases, interaction with other combustion products results in a portion of the elemental mercury being converted into gaseous oxidized fon11s of mercury (Hg+2). 

## Oxidation is beneficial because Hg+2 compounds are generally water-soluble and are, therefore, more effectively captured by wet scrubbers and other pollution control systems. Conversely, HgO 

## is difficult to control and is likely to enter the global atmospheric cycle because ofits high vapor pressure and low water solubility. A small portion ofHgO 

## and Hg+2 

## adsorbs onto flue gas particulates, forming particle-bound mercury (HgP). 

## Thus, mercury exists in three different fOlms in coal combustion gas
- elemental, oxidized, and particulatebound

- with the gaseous (vapor stage) forms being the most prevalent in stack emissions.
Since HgO is the most difficult fonn of mercury flue gas emissions to remove, the primary key to reducing total mercury flue gas emissions lies in forming mercury compounds (oxidation) or particle-binding (absorption) elemental mercury in the flue gas stream, and removing this oxidized or particulate-bound mercury via existing Air Pollution Control Devices (APCD). This mercury oxidation/absorption condition is a function of the aforementioned inten"elated factors that are quite complex and only partially understood, making predictive total mercury emission concentrations difficult.
TIle Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAlvfR) makes no distinction regarding the speciation of the mercury; rather, it seeks to regulate the total mercury emitted from the stack(s) and into the atmosphere. TIlls baseline test was designed to present total atmospheric mercury emissions at the time of the sampling, thus giving an indication (assuming representative plant operations) of the annual baseline mercury emissions at the sampled pre-stack duct. In 

## addition, the test results obtained by the sorbent tube technology were compared to the results obtained by the temporarily installed Thermo Environnlental Freedom SystemTM Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM) to assess the accurateness of the CMM 

## at the time of the sampling.


## 2.1 Source Description
Ratts #1 is a coal-fired unit utilizing La 

## NOx bumers without overfire air and a coldside electrostatic precipitator (ESP).

2-1

## 2.2 Mercury 

## Sampling Plan
Prior to the test date(s), a general mercury sampling plan was developed to assess and compare the fate of mercury from the tested emission streams, consisting only of fluegas sampling. Materials sampling (coal, ash, etc.), as may be appropliate to detelluine the relative mass balance ofmercury throughout the fluegas stream, was not part ofthis sorbent tube study as these issues are reportedly addressed in the continuous mercw-y monitor evaluation. Fluegas samples were obtained at the pre-stack duct only in order to establish baseline speciated and total mercury concentrations being emitted to the atmosphere. Fluegas sampling consisted of taking simultaneous duplicate samples, in order to demonstrate quality assurance by demonstrating reproducibility of results within statistical limits.
The fluegas mercury sampling was conducted at steady load. Testing at the sampling location consisted of three runs of duplicate FAMSTM sorbent tubes. In addition, one field blank FAMSTM sorbent tube was obtained over the course of the sampling as a quality assurance measure.
This Hg test was conducted on January 18,2006. Over the course ofthe fluegas testing program conducted by AQS, Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) data (C02 

## and flow) was collected during the Hg sampling program in order to calculate the
mass emissions (lbs/trillion Btu) ofHg at the stack, along with the Continuous Mercury Monitor data to which the sorbent tube results are to be compared.


## 2.3 Labeling Conventions and Reporting Units AQS utilizes a sample identifier (number) for each Hg sanlple taken. This identifier reflects, in order, the run, location, and Hg trap number (e.g. sanlple number 2-2-1 is the sample taken during run 2, at sampling location 2, and is the first Hg trap). The only sampling location (location #1) for this test study was the pre-stack duct for Unit #1.



## . In 

## order to allow direct comparison ofHg concentration results at the stack, all fluegas results are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (Jlg/m3) 

## at standard conditions (temperature = 

## 68°F and barometric pressure = 

## 29.92" Hg [1 atmosphere]).
2.4 Executive SUD1Dlary


## This baseline mercury (Hg) diagnostic study and continuous mercury monitor validation test was conducted for Hoosier Energy on Ratts #1 coal-burning power plant stack. The purpose ofthis test was to quantify baseline total mercury emissions as they pertain to the Clean Air Mercw-y Rule (CAMR) ), and to compare the speciated mercury results obtained by sorbent tube technologies with the results obtained by a temporarily installed Thenno Environmental Freedom System

## TM Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM)

..

2-2

## The fluegas mercury sampling was conducted at steady load at each of the units. Key results and statistics resulting from this study are presented as follows:
Table 2.4 Key Results and Statistics

Approximate 

### CEMS CMM ,PAIlS 

# 'i-;",.,J TotalHg ,.­ " CO2 :1JbIIIIlI1an t

# :r.f~' Run' ('Yo) Flow (sefh) :(MIl",',

. I, :

# .... 

# ... ' 

## Hi' WG/IItlli
13.36% 15,738,366 4.9858 3.8576 0.1700 1.8850 1.0600 3.1150 2.4101 1.871 1.4475 60.06%
2 13.37% 15,948,153 4.8807 3.7743 0.0450 1.7400 0.9850 2.7700 2.1421 2.1 II 1.6322 76.20%
3 13.34% 16,271,920 4.8489 3.7568 0.0400 1.9150 0.9900 2.9450 2.2817 1.904 1.4751 64.65%
AI'l!ruge /3.36% 15,986,147 4.905/ 

### 3.7962 11.0850 1.11467 1.0117 

### 2.9433 2.2780 

### 1.962 1.5183 66.97%
Sid. Dc,'. 

### 0.01% 2611,7911 U.0717 0.0539 0.0737 0.0936 0.0419 0.1725 0.1340 0.1300 0.0997 8.32%

t. 

### td. 

### DC\'. 0.10% 1.68% 1.46% 1.42% 86.65% 5.07% 4.14% 5.86% 5.88% 6.63% 6.56% 12.42%


## Continuous mercury monitor (CMM) results are approximated, as only total hourly Hg results were provided (not matched up exactly to test run times). As can be seen from the data presented in the table, the average CMM results for total mercury obtained over the test period are approximately 67% higher than total Hg test results obtained during the same period by sorbent tube technology. These results are consistent with those for Unit #1, which showed CMM results approxiInately 66% higher than sorbent tube Hg results.



## 2-3

## SECTION 3 l\1ERCURY 

## STUDY TEST RESULTS
Presented in tlus section are data and graphs covering both FAMST-M trap and CMM mercury test results over the same sampling peliod. Results ofthe tests, expressed in micrograms per cubic meter, are shown on the aforementioned data tables and graphs. The FAMSTM trap results for Hoosier Energy Ratts Station Unit #1 are within statistical limits for valid data recovery; DUling the sampling period, the temperature of the sampling probe at the location of the sorbent trap was maintained at 202°P (± 

## SOP) 

## to ensure volatilization ofthe flue gas moisture. As designed, each sampling run consisted oftwo simultaneous sampling trains. Each sample train consisted of a 43" section ofquartz tubing that extended approximately W' into the flue gas stream followed by the PAMSTM sorbent traps; traps 1 and 2, respectively. Upon completion of the each sampling run, the sampling pumps were shut off and the sampling trains 

## were removed.
Results from the Continuous Mercury Monitor (CMM) were inserted into the total mercury tables for comparative purposes.

3-1

## Table 3.1 Total 

## Hg 

## Sample Number Test Results (flglm) 

## -Run Trap 

### ,TiUJ;H2 1 1 3.14 1 

## 2 3.09 1 

## CMM 4.99 

## 2 

## 1 2.78 2 

## 2 2.76 2 

## CMM 4.88 3 1 2.81 3 

## 2 3.08 3 

## CMM 4.85


## Figure 3.1 

## Total Hg**~._---_.- ._--~-**  

### --- . ._---; 

## 6.0



## 5.0

4.0 

# "'e Cl 3.0 ::1. 

## 2.0

1.0



## 0.0 1-1 1-2 1-CMM 2-1 2-2 2-CMM**RU.~** 

### - (Trap or CMM) 

# L--- L---_____________

_ -----' 3-1 3-2 3-CMM



## 3-2

### Table 3.2 Speciated Hg Sample Number Test Results 

## blg/rol ) 

### Run TI'8D 

### PHlt 

### Ha+a 

### Hl

1 1 0.18 1.92 1.04 1 2 0.16 1.85 1.08 2 1 0.02 1.80 0.96 2 

### 2 0.07 1.68 1.01 

### 3 1 0.06 1.82 0.93 3 2 

### 0.02 2.01 1.05 Average: 

### 0.09 

### 1.85 1.01 Std. 

### Dev.: 0.07 0.11 0.06 ReI. Std. Dev.: 

### 81.4% 6.1% 5.6%


## Figure 3.2 Speciated Hg

3.5

---------**--~.----.-----.----** 

### .-- _.- --.- ------.-------_.--- -- - - ----. -._. ------­ 

## 3.0
2.5
2.0 M 

# .e OJ 

### 1.5
1.0 

## [] HgO 0.5 

## .Hg+2 

# .PHg 0.0 Run -Trap



## 3-3

## SECTION 4 FIELDQAlQC
4.1. Field Practices
Sorbent tube technologies intrinsically allow for minimal potential for field contamination. All sorbent tubes were handled with powderless latex gloves and sealed in zip lock bags following use.
4.2 

## Simultaneous Field Duplicate Results
The Hg sampling plan was designed to conduct a series ofsimultaneous field duplicates in order to measure precision and accuracy ofthe F

## AMSTM method. Analytical results for the sampled locations, along with the associated statistical information, are shown in table 4.2.1. Particle bound Hg is excluded due to its low contribution to the overall total.
Table 

## 4.2 Simultaneous Field Duplicate Results

FAMS #2 (ug Hglm3) 

### Avera Standardnevlatton
Run # Hg02 Hg02 Hg OO Total Hg02

. HgoD Total Hg02 HgoD
1.t2 3."4 1.86 1.08 1.06 3;12 0.81 '0.03 0
2 1.10 

### OM UI 1.68 1.01 2.76 1;74 0.99 2.77 0.08 

### OM
3 1. o.t3 2JI1 2.01 1.06 3.08 1;92 G.99 

### O..oa



## 4.3 Field Blanks
One field blank was taken during the sampling. The results ofthese field blanks show very little deviation from the laboratory baseline Hg quantities of .033 ng/trap, as follows (note that results are presented in nanograms/gram):
Table 4.3 Field Blank Results
Test**Res~lts** 

## (ng/trap)

-­ 

### Hg+z 

### HgU 

### TotalHg 

## SampleID PHg 

### NNN 4155 0.00 0.49 0.95 1.44



## 4-1

## SECTION 5
TEST DATA
5.1 CEMS Data
CEMS data (C02 

## and flow), along with estimated HzO% 

## (derived ii-om psychrometric charts), was collected from the plant in order to calculate stack emissions in mass units (lbs.ltrillion Btu). In addition, coal usage was obtained

## in order to calculate theoretical Hg emissions from the fuel source. A summary ofthe sample times and collected test data is presented in figure 5.1.1.


## Table 5.1 CEMSData

Sample CEMSTime Duration Temp Flow Est. Date Run Start End (Minutes) 

### degF C02 (%) (seth) 

### H20 

### % 1/1812007 1 10:10 11 :10 60 285 13.36% 15,738,366 8.00 2 11:49 12:49 60 286 13.37% 15,948,153 8.00 3 13:16 14:16 60 286 13.34% 16,271,920 8.00 Average: 13.36% 15,986,147 8.00



## 5.2 Hg Trap Results & 

## Data Summary


## A summary ofthe Hg sample data is presented in the following table:


## Table 5.2 Hg Tt"ap Results & 

## Data Summary Sample Number Trap Results (ng/trap) • Sampling Duration Offset Cor Volume CEMSRun Averages Test Results**(~mJ)**
Run 

## f Trap PHil HIlH HSo Tow H8 (MinUle5) (Lilel5) SlIck 

### CO: % Flow (5Cfm) Flow (dac:fin) 

### PHa HS+ 1**I~g"** Tolal**H~** 1 1 44242 47.9190 26.0120 78.3553 60 24.96 13.36% 262.306 241,322 0.18 192 1.04 314
1 2 39888 475126 27.6940 791954 60 25.66 13.36% 262,306 241,322 0.16 1.85 108 3.09
2 1 0.5937 459492 24.5658 711088 60 25.52 13.37% 265,803 244,538 0.02 1.80 096 2.78
2 2 17315 42.2303 25.3587 69.3205 60 25.17 1337% 265,803 244,538 0.07 1.68 1.01 2.76
3 1 14921 454237 23.1882 70.1040 60 24.98 13.34% 271,199 249,503 0.06 1.82 0.93 2.81 3 2 05055 52.9463 27.6988 81.1506 60 26.28 13.34% 271,199 249,503 0.02 201 105 308
Field Blank 00000 0.9467 04933 1.4400



### 5-1

## SECTION 6
CALCULATED VALVES
6.1 Mass Emissions Calculations
Mass emissions for each stack were calculated in accordance ,,,,ith USEPA Method 19,
as follows:

When Hg concentration is measured on a dry basis (Cd) and CO2 

### concentration is measured on a wet basis (C02w), 

### the CO2

### -based F Factor is determined by the following equation:

E 

# = Pollutant emission rate, (Ib/trillion Btu) Cd 

# = Pollutant concentration, dry basis, (Ib/set) Fe 

# = Volume of combustion components per unit of heat content, (scf/million Btu) 

### Note: at standard conditions (68 0 

### Fand 29,92 

### inches ofHg), 

### Fe is as follows: Antracite 

## = 1,970 scf/MMBtu Bituminous 

# = 1,800 scf/MMBtu Lignite 

# = 1,910 scf/MMBtu B

ws 

# = Moisture fraction of effluent gas, percent C02w 

# = Concentration of CO2 

### on a wet basis, percent


## The following subsections present the calculated Hg mass emission rates for each sample run:



## 6.1.1 Run 

## #1 Mass Emissions
Data Input Cd 

## Fe B

ws 

### C02w 

## =

=

= 

# = 3.115 

### Ilg /scm

% 

### scf/MMBtu

% (Avg.)

(Avg.) (Avg.) 1,800 8.00% 13.36%



## ..... Emiaaion Rate 2.41011 Ibs.ltrillion Btu



## 6-1

## 6.1.2 Run 

## #2 Mass Emissions
Data Input 

## Cd Fe Bws 

## C02w 

## =

=

=

= 2.770 

### Ilg/scm

% 

### scf/MMBtu

% (Avg.)

(Avg.) (Avg.) 

### 1,800 8.00% 13.37%


# MauEmiuiolllRate
2.14211 Ibs.ltrillion Btu



## 6.1.3 Run 

## #3 Mass Emissions
Data Input 

## Cd Fe Bws 

## C02w 

## =

=

=

= 2.945 

### Ilg/scm

% 

### scf/MMBtu

% (Avg.)

(Avg.) (Avg.) 

### 1,800 8.00% 13.34%


## Mas. Emisslon·Rate 2.28171 Ibs.Jtrillion Btu



## 6.1.4 Combined Runs Mass Emissions
Data Input 

## Cd Fe 

## Bws C02w 

## =

=

=

= 2.943 

### Ilg/scm

% 

### scf/MMBtu

% (Avg.)

(Avg.) (Avg.) 

### 1,800 8.00% 13.36%



## ..... Em

..

## ioniRate 2.27795 Ibs.ltrillion Btu



## 6-2

## SECTION 7
TEST SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND ANALYTICAL TEST METHODS Fluegas samples were obtained using sOl'bent tube technologies; namely the Fluegas Absorbent Mercury Speciation (FAMSTM) Method. FAMSTM has been granted US EPA perfollllance based validation.
7.1 FJuegas Absorbent Mercury Speciation (FAMSTM) Method
The F AMS**~ethod r~lies**  

## on**sequen~ial** 

## selective**c:a~tW"e** 

## to s;}?arate and quantify three mercury specIes, partIculate Hg (Hg ), gaseous oXIdIZed (Hg ), and gaseous elemental (Hg

## o ). A known, precise volume (±0.1 liter) ofgas is pulled through the FAMS sorbent train using standard sampling equipment including a quartz probe liner, heatedlcooled probe, silica-gel water trap, mass flow meter and pwnp. The temperature ofthe FAMS sorbent train is kept at 95 ± 

## SoC during sampling to avoid water condensation in the trap

.. The sorbed HgO on the chemically impregnated carbon and the PHg on the glass wool plug is leached ofcollected Hg in the clean lab using hot-refluxing HN03

## IH 2 

## S0 4, 

## then further oxidation in BrCI solution. The sorbed Hg+2 

## on the KCl trap is dissolved in (v/v) 

## BrCl solution. Aliquots of all three Hg species digests are analyzed using EPA Method 1631.
7.2 Flow Measurements
Flow is determined by the use ofmass flow meters. Dry fluegas is pulled at a nominal flow rate of 0.2 to 0.6 Llmin through Aalborg flow meters. As a quality assurance (QA) measure, these flow meters are calibrated at the factory at standard conditions (29.92 inches of mercury and 68°F), traceable to National Institute of Standards and Iesting (NIST) standards. The mass flow meters, by virtue of essentially counting molecules across the transducer, are not affected by temperature andlor barometric pressure fluctuations.
The operating principle ofthe transducers is based on heat transfer and the first la\v of thermodynamics. During operation process gas enters the instruments flow body and divides into two flow paths, one through the sensor tube, and the other through the laminar flow element bypass. The laminar flow bypass generates a pressure drop, P1­ P2, forcing a small fraction ofthe total flow to pass through the sensor tube (m1)'



## 7-1

## Figure 

## 1-2. Flow Paths through the Transducer

CTWOCOilS**~~~m¥~:tt-** 

### Sensor tube

Laminar flow 

## bypass rh 

# =ril, 

### + rt1 2 

### rh 

# = ril, 

### (1 

## + 11l2

### /rtl 1) 

# =k rtl, 

## Figure 

## 1-2. Flow Paths through the Transducer



## Two resistance temperature detector (RTD) coils around the sensor tube direct a constant amount ofheat (H) into the gas stream. In 

## actual operation, the gas mass flow carries heat from the upstream coil to the downstream coil. The resulting temperature difference (DT) is detected by the RTD coils and gives the output signal. Since the molecules of the gas carry away the heat, the output signal is linearly proportional to gas mass flow. Figure 

## 1-3. Flow Measuring Principle**RTDSenSOr** Sensor Tube



### m



## L Constant Heat H 

## ---.J
FilS Law of Thermodynamic:a (Heel IN = Heal OUT) H. 1ft, C. IT,

- T,I+ He

# lm=~ 

# I
Figure 

## 1-3. Flow Measuring Principle

7-2

## 7.3 

## Analytical Test Method AQS uses the technical and analytical support ofFrontier GeoSciences, Inc. 

## (co-author ofthe FSTM Test Method, USEPA Method J

## 631 

## and author of the F AMSTM Method). Accordingly, both fluegas and material samples are analyzed at the Frontier GeoSciences, Inc. dedicated trace metals laboratory following the guidelines set fOl1h in USEPA Method 1631, revision E. In this method, aliquots ofdigested Hg samples are oxidized with bromine monochloride and sparged with nitrogen onto a gold trap. The mercury is thermally desorbed from the gold trap into a cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometer (CVAFS). The CVAFS analytical test methodology, when used in conjunction with FAMSTM sampling protocol, has a demonstrated method detection limit (MDL) of0.006 Ilg/m3 for particulate bound Hg (PHg), 0.026 J..lg/m3 for elemental Hg (HgO), 0.018 Jlg/m3 for oxidized Hg (Hg+2), 

## and 0.035 Jlg/m3 for total Hg (THg). Under standard conditions (l 

## atmosphere at 68°F), the MDL's are 0.73 ppt for particulate bound Hg (PHg), 3.17 ppt for elemental Hg (Hgo), 2.20 ppt for oxidized Hg (Hg+2), 

## and 4.27 ppt for total Hg (THg).

7-31" ',:-",'.'**,~,\,'~::,j}'-;** ',.,">,

, ;:**~'-'** 

# ··APPENDIXA

!



## --,

. . 

# Field Data Sheets**:.~_~. ~~~.-r--~~**  ..
__••_. •

-**~-~-----4-~** 

## _ e_ •Mr. Steve Endress ProJe<1: "_ler ERe'1ll' Air Quality Services Page I of5 Results: Mercury Specladon In Flue GasVia Flue Gas Adsorbent Mercury Speciation (FAMS) Methed Gerard Van derJaxt

- Fronder Geosciences Inc:. 1-31-07

Schematic 

### orFlue Gas AdsorbentMerc

Hg(O)-8 Hg(O}-A

! I

# ~~ 

# Z**H9(1I)-~"** I 

# '.' , Hg(II)08

c;",...

.

## ~.=~"=~~

...
_______ n

__ ..
__ ....... _ ............



### ---- -- 

## ---- 

## -- -- - ---- -._­ 

# I Vol

..... Hg(Oj TmlHg rHg 8g(Uj Sample ID (LIteR) (OIBlim"3) (

... HlllmA3) (oa HIII"'"3) ("ll Hlllm"3) NNN4141 24.72 0.18 1.05 1.94 3.17 NNN4144 25.30 0.16 1.09 1.88 3.13 24.93 NNN3968 0.02 0.99 2.85 1.84 0.Q7 NNN4127 25.22 1.67 1.01 2.75 24.80 NNN 3958 0.06 0.94 1.83 2.83 26.13 NNN3960 0.02 1.06 2.03 3.11 NNN4155 NA NA NA NA NA**.-~**
- 

### ....\. 

### '.)
\'­ Incident Particulate Trap Or Quartz Fiber Filter 

# \?_....

.**.~**

,.,.

## ~",,,.,,.,.;(: ..,. .

## ",,1. 

# 3,:"

RPD

1.25
3.68
9.37
< JileIdBluk

•

________ 9

____ ••

__ 'O­ 

### - ---- -- 

## - -------- .. J 

# I SandeID

. NNN4141 NNN4144 NNN3968 NNN4127 NNN3958 NNN3960 NNN4155 Avenge> l'Ra As % OfTOClll1It:

5.6% 33.2% 61.2% 5.0% 35.0% 60.0% 0.8% 34.5% 64.6% 2.5% 36.6% 60.9% 2.1% 0.6% NA 

### z.rlo HI(0)AI% OrTolalHe

33.1% 34.1% NA



## -- ..... 34.4% Hg(ll) As '/0 OrTOll1 H.

64.8% 65:2%
< I'1eId Blank NA 

## .­ 6z.rl.
TABLE 3: FAMS & FSTM Tral Per Section 

### or Tra' Hg(OI S

........ ID I In IIeI1nDII lOll HIIIlrlD) NNN 4141 nil 

# I I 4.42 26.01 NNN 4144 

# I 3.99 

# I 27.69 NNN 3968 0.59 24.57 NNN 4127 

# I 1.73 

# I 25.36 NNN 3958 1.49 23.19 NNN 3960 0.51 27.70 NNN 4155 

### I 0.00 

### I 0.49 

### I 0.95 

### I 1.44 

### 1< Jilek! 8Iank

R-.. AOS_1 2407
...

### Mr. Steve Endress Project: U_r E••'1!Y 

### Air Quality Services Page 2 DfS Results: Mercury Speciation In Flue Gas Via Flue Gas Adsorbent**Mer~ury** Spedallon (Ji'AMS) Method Gerard Vlln de, Jagt

- F,ontie, GetlSdences Inc. /-3/-07



## ... - .. 

# -- ..... ..-

### .. 

### .. ....... ....


### __

### ....

# _­ 8laDk Cor Lob Oat. Sot ID THGI6-070129-1 R

... # _10 II1!/mtor .00mt.r 1710 NNN4141pHg 4.549 ng 4.424 og TIlGI6-070129-1 1714 NNN 4144 pHg 4.114 ng 3.989 ng TUGI6-070129-1 1711 NNN 3968 pHg 0.719 ng 0.594 ng TIlG16-070129-1 1715 NNN4127pUa L857 ng 1.731 ng TIlGI6-070129-1 1713 NNN 3958pHg \.617 ng 1.492 Dg TIlGl6-070129-1 1716 NNN 3960pHg 0.631 ng 0.505 ng TIlGl6-070129-1 1717 NNN4155pHg O.ooong 0.000 ng



# .**-~."** .. ... -.,. 

# ...

# - &&

.............. _ - .. - ......... ...., u

............... lIIo"kC

.... LobOa

.. SolID lHG17-Q70129-] LobRn. 6170 Settqlle ID NNN4141 FSTMA 1la(0.-A (IIII1rap) 25.988 ng Hg(O.-A 1ll1!/lnp)

25.93 tHG17-070\29-1 6172 NNN4144 FSTMA 27.457 ng 27.40 tHOI7-Q70129-1 TU017-070129-\ 6171 6173 NNN 3968 FSTM A NNN 4127 FstMA 24,326 ng 15.2S9ng 24.26 25.20 tHGI7-070129-1 6169 NNN 3958 FSTM A 22.968 ng 22.9\ tH017-070129-1 6174 NNN 3960FSTMA 27.761 ng 27.70 TIlO! 7.070129-1 6179 NNN 4155 FSTMA 0.255 ng 0.19



# _. ..

__

## .... .. 

# - 

# - - ...

# - -_

... 

# - -.......

Lob Do

.. Sot ID THG17-070129-1 TH017-Q70129-1 lHGI1-010129-\ TU017-Q70129-1 TIlGl7.070129- 1 TIlGl7-Q70129-1 THG17-Q70129-1 BbIlkCor 0&<0'-8 0&<0'-8 R

... Som

.... 10 Int!ltr'D) (••/lnP) 6189 NNN 4141 FSTM B 0.148ng 0,09 6183 NNN 4144 PSTM B 0.361 ng 0.30 6181 NNN 3968PSTMB 0.364118 0.30 6184 NNN 4127 PS'IMB 0.224 ng 0,16 6182 NNN 3958FSTM B 0.344ng 0.28 6185 NNN3960PSTMB 0.157ng 0.00 6186 NNN 4155FSTMB 0.363 ng 0.30



## .. 

# -.....

# _._......

# __.... 

### TABLE



### ....

# - PH' 

# - Lob Data set ID THGI6-010129-1 THGl6-070129-1 

## ....................
_ 

## ....
R••• SemplelD lIE 

# I 1680 REAGENT BLANK 0.ooo n8 1709 REAGENTBLANK 0.251ng Anrage> 0.13 S

..-...J. Devla_ (SD) > NA Relative S

...dud Devla_ (RSD) > NA

., ... 411'

_ ..... _ - .. -... ...... l

....IIIP

.... VU 

# . ................ "BTnp" Lob Dota Set 10 Rout. SamDleID ngJlnp THGI7-070129-1 6160 FSTM-BUCI 0.122 ng THGI7-070129-1 6161 FstM·BUCl 0.043 ng TH0l7 -070129-1 6162 PSTM·BLK3 0.083 ng TH0l7-070129-1 6163 FstM-BUC4 O.ooong Aven:ae > 0.06 StaDdanl De.lotlo. (SO) > 0.05 Re

...... S

...... n1 Devtatloe (RSD) > 84.7%

Rnull-AQS_12401ld1

# ---- - Mr. Steve Endress Prvlect: 8_l<r \!AeflJ' 

### Air Quality Services Page 3 of 5 Resullll: Mercury SpeciatIon In Flue Gas Via Flue Gas Adsorbent Mercury Spedalion (FAMS) Method Gerard VI/II derJagt

- Frtllltier Geo:M:ienctlS fnc. 1-31-07



### .. 

## .....

# _-
......

# _-_....... 

### ....


# _ . 

### ......

# -_. Blallk Cor ng(II)-A Hg(II)-A Lab Dola Sol m TIlGl6-070129-1 LabR

.. # 

### s.
...... m (IIllUC/Inp) (DC/Inpl 1690 NNN4141 KClA 47.252 ng 47.11 THGl6-070129-1 1693 NNN 4144 KCI A 46.284 ng 46.14 TIlG16-070129-1 1691 NNN3968KClA 45.572 ng 45.43 TIlGI6-070129-1 1688 NNN 4127 KCIA 41.839 ng 41.70 TIlGl6-070129·1 1692 NNN 3958 KClA 45004 ng 44.86 TIlGl6-070129-1 TIlGI6-070129·1 1694 NNN3960KClA 51.896 ng 51.75 1695 NNN4155KClA 1.089 08 0.95



# .. ....... , 

# . 

# ... -........ .._._- ..**~&_** 

# ... "

## .... Blank Cor Uc(U)-B Ug(II)-B Lab Dola Sol 

### m (agHg/lnp) Sa

...... ID (III Hg/lnp) Raa* TIlO16-070129·1 1700 NNN4141 KCIB 0.952ng 0.81 lHGl6-070 129-1 1703 NNN4144KClB 1.513 ng 1.37 1701 rnG' 6-070 129·1 NNN 3968 KCI B 0.662 n, 0.52 rnGl6-Q70129-1 1704 NNN4.127 KCIB 0.676 ng 0.53 0705 08 THGl6·070 129-1 1702 NNN 3958 Kct B 0.56 rnG 16-070 129-1 1705 NNN 3960 KClB 1.335 ng 1.19**TIlGI6-070129~1** 1718 NNN4155KClB 0.18508 0.00

.. .. _ ____ ........**~G'_** ....... - .- "'I

....... ....... _._**.~-_** 

# ........ ...
Lab Oata Sot ID R••

# * Sam

.... 

### m Uc(II)-A8<B (ngHg/lnp) rnGl6-070129-1 1681 KCI-BLKl 0.00008 lH016-Q70129-1 1682 KCI·BLK2 0.252 ng lH0I6-Q70129-1 1683 KCl-BUO 0.000 Dg THOI6-070129·1 1684**KC~BlK4** 0.31708 Aftn" > 0.142 Slaadanl Davlall

.. (SDI > 0.17 Relative Slaadanl Ile.lalloll (MD) > NA

R

..... "Q9_1 2407 .•

### Mr. Steve Endress Proj«t: Uooslo. Ea.rgy 

### Air Quality Services Page 4 of5 Resultll: Mercury Speciation In Flue Gas Via Flue Gas Adsorbent Mercury Spe4:iatlon (FAMS) Method Gerard v,." der Jagt

- Frontier Ge"sciences Inc. 1-31-07
TABLE 1I: ESTIMATED MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT

TABLE 11: ANALYSIS QAlQC PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

- SRM Results LobDoco SoliD TIlG 16-070129-1 TIlG17-070129·j R

.. _ 1673 6154 QC Parameler lCVINISI' 164ld lCV/NIST 1641d Observed Vtl.e 1460786.866 ngiL 1515311.688ng/L TABLE 13: FRONTIER GEOSCIENCES LAB CONTROL SPIKE RECOVERY

Lob Do," Sot W LobR••

_ LobS

........ 10 M

.....od (.cttrop' B1a

...

### c t M

.. n

.... ('RfTnp) E'p<etod (nglTnp) THGl6-070129·1 1685 KO·SPIKE1+30

.. 27.664 ng 27.52 30.00 TIlGI6-070129-1 1686 KQ.SPIKE2+3Ong 27.817 ng 27.67 30.00 mG11-o70129-1 6164 fSTM-SPIKEI+30ng 27.884

.. 27.74 30.00 THGI7-070129-1 6165 fSTM·SPIKE2+3Ona 26.547

.. 26.40 30.00 TABLE 14: FRONTIERGEOSCIENCES ANALYfICAL SPIKE RECOVERY

Lob Dol. SoUp LlbR••

_ Lob Simple OJ 

# M.......... (ngltnpJI
THGl6-070129-1 1699 NNN 4127 KCI A AS+144"ll 

# 1 179.613 ng TH0I7-070129-1 6178 NNN 4141 fSTMA AS+80"ll 100.885 ng TABLE 15: LAB REPLICATE RESULTS R

__ RepIkolelll R

........,,1 Lob DolO SolID _ID (.glTnpJ (qfl'npJ**mOl~129-1** 1698 NNN 4117 KCI A AD 41.839 ng R665"ll mOI7-o70129-1 6177 NNN4141fSTMAAD 25.988

.. 24.3731lf1

R-*·AQS_12"'07 .•IMr. SIeve Endress

.....j.tt: Hoosle' E••l'1ll' Air Quality Services Page50f5 Results: Mereury Speciation In Flue Gal' Via Flue Gas Adsorbent Mercury Speciation (FMIS) Method Germ V"" tkr JIIgt. Frontier Ge08aences Inc. 1-31-07
TABLE 16: Continued Calibration Blanks (CCBs

Lob Doh Set m R.n# CC81D ICBlllB 1HGl6-070129-1 1678 0.144 "gIL <0.15 mGl6-070129-1 1675 CCBl 0.097 ngIL <0.15 mOI6-070129-1 1676 CCB2**O.I~OoWL** <.0.25 THG16-070129-1 1677 CCB3 0.161 "gIL <0.15
mo 16-070 129-1 1697 CCB4 0.094 ngIL <0.15 0.239 ngIL mOI6-070129-1 1708**CCB~** <0.15 n10l6-070 129-1 1720 CCB6**0.1~6** oWL <0.15**615~** ICBlBB 0.024 ngIL mOI7-070129-1 <0.15 m017-070129-1 6156 CCBl 0.060 ngIL < 0.15 CCB2 mOl7-070129-1**61~7** 0.031 oWL <0.15 mOl 7-070129-1 6158 CCB3 0.040 ugIL < 0.15 nIOI 7-070129· I 6176 CCB4 0.094 oWL <;0.15 1HOI7-070129.' 6188**CCB~** 0.089 ngIL <0.15 n10I7-070129-1 6191 CCB6 0.106 ngIL <0.25

TABLE 17: Continued Calibration Verlneadon

CCVID Mea

.. red Lab Doh Set ID TncV."c R •• ' 111016-070119-1 THGl6-070129-1 mOl6-070129-1 mOl 7-070 129-1 mOl7-070129-1 lHGl7-070129·1 1696 1707 1719 6175 6187 6190 CCVI CCV2 CCV3 CCVl CCV2 CCV3 19.562 nglL 18813 ngIL 19534 ngIL 19.644 ngIL 19.651 ngIL 19.559 ngIL 20.00 20.00 2000 20.00 20.00 20.00**97.r~** '-4.1-;'**97~7-1,** 98.2-;' 98.3-;, ".!I-;' 80%**-110"~** 80%-110% 80% -110%**8O%-110"~** SO-I,· 110-1_**8O'~-110%**

RMutI,·AQS_'2"Or-'df;**~-- --~,**  

# •APPENDIXB

Laboratory Summary

, _"JAverage 

## :'Run#2

TIme 

# I COl 

# I Flow' 

# TTC)fli'ti9, 

# ,. (1Cfh) (lWe-r 11:50 13.3% 16.081.739.0 11:51 13.4% 16.126.054.0 11:52 13.3% 16,040,283.0 11:53 13.2% 15.669,687.0 11:54 13.2% 15,403,172.0 11:55 13.3% 15.756,215.0 11:56 13.3% 15,917.294.0 11:57 13.2% 16,108,410.0 11:58 13.1% 16,064.353.0 11:59 13.2% 15.878,223.0 12:00 13.3% 15,858,773.0 12:01 13.4% 16.002,352.0 12:02 13.5% 16,278.866.0 12:03 13.5% 16.273,542.0 12:04 13.4% 16,327,892.0 12:05 13.4% 16.306.540.0 12:06 13.4% 16.265,023.0 12:07 13.4% 16,404.509.0 12:08 13.4% 16,463,575.0 12:09 13.4% 16.394.501.0 12:10 13.4% 16,162,589.0 12:11 13.4% 16.184.057.0 12:12 13.5% 16.195.499.0 12:13 13.5% 16,119.621.0 12:14 13.5% 16.105,794.0 12:15 13.5% 16.168.645.0 12:16 13.5% 16,131.962.0 12:17 13.5% 16,183,563.0 12:18 13.5% 16.144.637.0 12:19 13.5% 16,457,360.0 12:20 13.5% 16.516.690.0 12:21 13.5% 16,456,490.0 12:22 13.5% 16.396,898.0 12:23 13.5% 16.062,929.0 12:24 13.5% 16.029.938.0 12:25 13.5% 16.054.637.0 12:26 13.5% 15,921.114.0 12:27 13.5% 15,609.078.0 12:28 13.4% 15,605.111.0 12:29 13.4% 15,482,638.0 12:30 13.3% 15,525,812.0 12:31 13.3% 15,658.685.0 12:32 13.3% 15,827.638.0 12:33 13.3% 15,433,280.0 12:34 13.3% 14,853.703.0 12:35 13.2% 14,633,259.0 12:36 13.2% 14,781,489.0 12:37­ 13.1% 14,818,841.0 12:38 13.1% 15.104.205.0 12:39 13.2% 15,570,387.0 12:40 13.2% 15,597,245.0 12:41 13.3% 15.563,070.0 12:42 13.3% 16.034.410.0 12:43 13.4% 16,092.945.0 12:44 13.4% 16,535.724.0 12:45 13.4% 16,433,724.0 12:46 13.4% 16.253.671.0 12:47 13.4% 16,100,014.0 12:48 13.4% 16.228.941.0 12:49 13.4% 16.231.910.0 

### 13.37% 15,841,153.4 4.881 

### .':.<:..••:
....

### ;E~U~;;::(I" 13:17 13:18 13:19 13:20 13:21 13:22 13:23 13:24 13:25 13:26 13:27 13:28 13:29 13:30 13:31 13:32 13:33 13:34 13:35 13:36 13:37 13:38 13:39 13:40 13:41 13:42 13:43 13:44 13:45 13:46 13:47 13:48 13:49 

# '···1Iun1Wl:',.**.;i:~** ;C02i;;![V**;~"iF_."~**

### 81~T0t8t~ '","':**;',;~f** "\WeMMIf 13.1% 16.104,288.0 13.2% 16.239.138.0 13.2% 16.297.255.0 13.2% 16.247,369.0 13.2% 16.147,512.0 13.2% 15.988,081.0 13.2% 15,952.006.0 13.2% 16.250,482.0 13.2% 16,210.157.0 13.3% 16.247.747.0 13.4% 16,183.110.0 13.4% 16.246,452.0 13.4% 16.402,197.0 13.4% 16.518,335.0 13.3% 16,476.976.0 13.3% 16,326,960.0 13.3% 16,338.197.0 13.3% 16,170.797.0 13.3% 16,209,559.0 13.3% 16,250.592.0 13.4% 16,232,434.0 13.4% 16,324.116.0 13.4% 16,155.674.0 13.4% 16,397,497.0 13.4% 16,589.166.0 13.4% 16,634,958.0 13.4% 16.363.735.0 13.4% 16,258.645.0 13.4% 16.209.551.0 13.4% 16,283,894.0 13.4% 16.185,839.0 13.4% 16,220,610.0 13.4% 16,177,027.0 13:50 13.4% 16.236,904.0 13:51 13.4% 16,325,519.0 13:52 13.4% 16,552.293.0 13:53 13:54 13.4% 13.4% 16.546,591.0 16,409.679.0 13:55 13.3% 16.169.002.0 13:56 13.3% 16.231,499.0 13:57 13.3% 16.121.841.0 13:58 13.3% 16.194,570.0 13:59 13.4% 16,222.380.0 14:00 13.4% 16.202.821.0 14:01 14:02 13.4% 13.4% 16.153,126.0 16,180,975.0 14:03 13.4% 16.426,435.0 14:04 13.4% 16,547.814.0 14:05 13.3% 16,445.964.0 14:06 13.3% 16.282,807.0 14:07 13.4% 16.131.319.0 14:08 13.4% 16,089,075.0 14:09 13.4% 16.079.225.0 14:10 13.4% 16,122,427.0 14:11 13.3% 16,104.110.0 14:12 13.3% 16,201,814.0 14:13 13.4% 16,176,998.0 14:14 13.4% 16,304.205.0 14:15 13.4% 16,478,446.0 14:16 13.4% 16,537.013.0 13.34% 16,271;920.1 4.849 

### CEMS Data Summary



## Run #1 Time 

# I CO2 Flow 

# ITotal Hg (by (Iclh) CMMj % 

# I
10:11 13.5% 16,345,747.0 10:12 13.5% 16,465,482.0 10:13 13.4% 16,446,968.0 10:14 13.4% 16,463,192.0 10:15 13.3% 16,392,487.0 10:16 13.2% 16,289,936.0 10:17 13.2% 16,210,814.0 10:18 13.3% 16.534,522.0 10:19 13.4% 16.579,264.0 10:20 13.4% 16,608,446.0 10:21 13.4% 16,347,312.0 10:22 13.4% 16,120.603.0 10:23 13.3% 16.163.275.0 10:24 13.3% 16.234.268.0 10:25 13.3% 16.248,513.0 10:26 13.4% 16,306.955.0 10:27 13.4% 16,247,194.0 10:28 13.4% 16,256,684.0 10:29 13.4% 16.167,195.0 10:30 13.4% 16,162,154.0 10:31 13.4% 16.216,326.0 10:32 13.3% 16,158.584.0 10:33 13.2% 16.103.662.0 10:34 13.2% 15,968,968.0 10:35 13.3% 15,951.403.0 10:36 13.4% 15,909,340.0 10:37 13.4% 15,833.292.0 10:38 13.4% 15,769,225.0 10:39 13.4% 15.751,745.0 10:40 13.4% 15,650,428.0 10:41 13.4% 15,640.522.0 10:42 13.3% 15,789,788.0 10:43 13.3% 16,110,930.0 10:44 13.4% 16,151,788.0 10:45 13.4% 15.939,636.0 10:46 13.4% 15.852,222.0 10:47 13.4% 15,727,503.0 10:48 13.4% 15,800,838.0 10:49 13.5% 15,851,102.0 10:50 13.5% 15.874,463.0 10:51 13.5% 15,838.504.0 10:52 13.4% 15.904,418.0 10:53 13.4% 16,165,874.0 10:54 13.4% 14.858,741.0 10:55 12.9% 4.345.785.0 10:56 13.6% 3,335,969.0 10:57 12.7% 11,511.314.0 10:58 13.2% 19,151,670.0 10:59 13.2% 16.511,643.0 11:00 13.3% 16,321,864.0 11:01 13.5% 16.325.022.0 11:02 13.5% 16,374,877.0 11:03 13.5% 16,375,995.0 11:04 13.4% 16,422,487.0 11:05 13.5% 16,509,612.0 11:06 13.5% 16,600,732.0 11:07 13.5% 16,825,538.0 11:08 13.4% 16,858,152.0 11:09 13.3% 16,798,192.0 11:10 13.3% 16,674.426.0 13.36% 15.738.366.2 4.986

# Average Data Plant: RATT Source: UNIT#1 Parameter: Multiole Parameters Report Period: 01/18/2007 10:00 Through 01/18/2007 14:30 Time Online Criteria: 1 Interval: 1 Minute 

### UNIT#1 Type: Roll 

### NOX#lMM**S02#1~M** 

### C02C PERCENTI FLOWSCFH SCFH 

# I LOADMW MW 

# I 1 OPAC- -PERCENT

# I 

# I TEMPF DEGF #/MMBTU #/MMBTU 

### 01/18/2007 10:00 13.4 16.214.797.0 126.8 22.18 275.2

### -·:T7iR~q.~~: I 

### 01/1812007 10:01 13.5 16,302,423.0 127.3 20.97 275.2 

### 01/18/2007 10:02 13.4 16,332,064.0 127.5 19.95 275.2 

### 01/1812007 10:03 13.4 16,442,098.0 128.0



# ., .\ 21.00 275.3 

### 01/1812007 10:04 13.4 16,637,742.0 128.4 23.49 275.3 

### 01/18/2007 10:05 13.5 16,595.229.0 128.8 22.34 275.5 

### 01/18/2007 10:06 13.5 16.663,808.0 128.8 23.11 275.8 

### 01/18/2007 10:07 13.5 16,779,180.0 128.8 22.30 276.0 

### 01/18/2007 10:08 13.5 16,773,830.0 128.8 21.67 276.2 

### 01/18/2007 10:09 13.5 16,434,871.0 128.1 21.85 276.1 

### 01/18/2007 10:10 13.5 16,363,295.0 128.0 r 21.47 276.1 

### 0111812007 10:11 13.5 16,345,747.0 128.1 

# , 21.37 276.1 

### 01/18/2007 10:12 13.5 16,465,482.0 128.1 21.18 276.0 

### 01/18/2007 10:13 13.4 16.446.968.0 128.0 22.17 276.0 

### 0111812007 10:14 13.4 16,463,192.0 127.9 25.46 276.1 

### 01/18/2007 10:15 13.3 16,392,487.0 127.8 26.54 276.1 

### 01/18/2007 10:16 13.2 16,289,936.0 127.6 26.12 276.3 

### 01/18/2007 10:17 13.2 16,210,814.0 127.5 24.60 276.4 

### 01/1812007 10:18 13.3 16,534,522.0 127.4 24.01 276.7 

### 01/18/2007 10:19 13.4 16,579,264.0 127.4 23.90 277.0 

### 01/18/2007 10:20 13.4 16,608.446.0 127.4 22.42 277.1 

### 01/18/2007 10:21 13.4 16,347,312.0 127.2 22.82 277.1 

### 01/18/2007 10:22 13.4 16,120.603.0 127.0 22.28 276.9 

### 01/18/2007 10:23 13.3 16,163,275.0 127.1 23.81 276.8 

### 01/1812007 10:24 13.3 16.234,268.0 127.0 26.92 276.8 

### 01/18/2007 10:25 13.3 16,248,513.0 127.1 27.13 276.8 

### 01/18/2007 10:26 13.4 16,306,955.0 127.1 27.12 276.8 

### 01/18/2007 10:27 13.4 16,247.194.0 126.9 24.34 276.9 

### 0111812007 10:28 13.4 16,256.684.0 126.9 24.74 276.9 

### 01/18/2007 10:29 13.4 16,167,195.0 126.7 21.60 276.9



### F 

# =Unit Offline E 

# =Exceedance I 

# =Invalid M 

# =Maintenance C 

# =Calibration Report Generated: 

### 01/19/07 08:28 Report Version 1.2.0829 RATTS-CEMS\\escsupport 1 of 9

# Average Data Plant: RAn Source: UNIT#1 Parameter: Multiple Parameters Report Period: 01/18/2007 10:00 Through 01/18/2007 14:30 Time Online Criteria: 1 01/18/2007 

### 10:30 13.4 16.162,154.0 126.2 22.26 277.0 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 

### 10:31 10:32 10:33 10:34 10:35 13.4 13.3 13.2 13.2 13.3 16,216,326.0 16,158,584.0 16,103,662.0 15,968.968.0 15,951,403.0 125.3 124.6 124.7 124.8 124.6

# ~lli 21.53 21.48 22.40 22.11 22.81 277.1 277.1 276.9 276,7 276.5 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 

### 10:36 10:37 13.4 13.4 15,909,340.0 15,833.292.0 124.5 124.3 

### . ··>i;; :O'..lIS4 

## I**~1~;~,i';'~~~;ri~m~.~~~** I 21.63 22,73 276,3 276.2 01/18/2007 

### 10:38 13.4 15,769,225.0 124.1 20.05 276.1 01/18/2007 

### 10:39 13.4 15,751,745.0 123.6 20.73 276.0 01/18/2007 

### 10:40 13.4 15.650.428.0 123.4 22,01 275,8 01/18/2007 

### 10:41 13,4 15.640,522.0

. 123.3 20.22 275.7 01/18/2007 

### 10:42 13.3 15,789,788.0 123.0 19.24 275.7 01/18/2007 

### 10:43 13.3 16,110.930.0 122.9 20.37 275.7 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 

### 10:44 10:45 10:46 10:47 10:48 10:49 10:50 10:51 10:52 13,4 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.4 16.151,788.0 15,939,636.0 15.852.222.0 15.727,503.0 15,800.838.0 15.851.102.0 15,874,463.0 15,838,504.0 15.904.418.0 123.1 123.2 123.1 123.2 123.3 123.4 123.3 123.3 123.3 20.48 20.93 19.05 20.48 20.95 20.35 19,38 19.51 20,05**"~iI'~** 

# ":,'".**~~**

## ~t:~,"**~'Jj .~"** **~'!1** "H;;';1'**i!ij~1(i'*1'!§!** I 

# II:

h**!i!i~li'~~U** 

# ;;",j''''''bf,'IJt ;I**::':·f{:G~t ~-,**  ':''!t.

### 4r~~~~1**~;~i-~::** ,.,**:~fi'"' ~~:**  \'

# t*:_.~i, 275.7 275.4 275.2 275.0 274.9 274.8 274.8 274.7
01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 

### 10:53 10:54 10:55 10:56 10:57 10:58 10:59 11:00 11:01 11:02 13.4

# li':~ I'•.

### ,,~j;;'i'**:~:;II'**

# II_!~ 13.5 13.5 16.165,874.0

# ~-~ .**:inig{1~31l'l&** 

## IC**,·;':':.~i!i~:'lt'7'{<** 

## :."**~'l.1iJJ;ro.~** 

## IC**~'~[fgi5.~1~t4~lIi** 

## IC**.'\·i;~t.:f~~~~'i~,i~~t [.:.~L** 

### 'J18;ai1'~,Q'IC

. .': .:,",.:.:", i**;'~~"~:'.I"':":-'** 16,325.022.0 16.374.877.0 124.0 125.3 125.4 124.4 123.3 124.7 126.1 126.2 126.8 126.6 

# ,";::::,·!;t:: : 20.30 21.22 22.00 21.23 21.16 22.29 21.35 23.60 25.74 22.47

# II~**t''''"'t:r;w'':'·r$~** 

## Ie

# ~(~{~~11~ii;'C**",:;;i,j~'''I,g'IC**

# :i,t)'~~~~~f~~t : 273.2 274.6



### F = 

### Unit Offline 

### E = 

### Exceedance I 

# =Invalid M 

# = Maintenance C 

# =Calibration Report Generated: 01/19/07 08:28 

### Report Version 1.2.0829 RAnS-CEMS\\escsupport 20f9

# Average Data

. Plant: RAn Source: UNIT#1 Parameter: Multiole Parameters Report Period: 01/18/2007 10:00 Through 01/18/2007 14:30 Time Online Criteria: 1 01/18/2007 11:03 13.5 01/18/2007 11:04 13.4 01/18/2007 11:05 13.5 01/18/2007 11:06 13.5 01/18/2007 11:07 13.5 01/18/2007 11:08 13.4 01/18/2007 11:09 13.3 01/18/2007 11 :10 13.3 01/18/2007 11 :11 13.4 01/18/2007 11:12 13.4 01/18/2007 11:13 13.4 01/18/2007 11 :14 13.4 01/18/2007 11:15 13.3 01/18/2007 11:16 13.2 01/18/2007 11:17 13.2 01/18/2007 11:18 13.2 01/18/2007 11:19 13.3 01/18/2007 11:20 13.2 01/18/2007 11:21 13.1 01/18/2007 11:22 13.1 01/18/2007 11:23 13.2 01/18/2007 11:24 13.2 01/18/2007 11:25 13.3 01/18/2007 11:26 13.3 01/18/2007 11:27 13.2 01/18/2007 11 :28 13.2 01/1812007 11:29 13.2 01/18/2007 11:30 13.3 01/18/2007 11:31 13.3 01/18/2007 11:32 13.3 01/18/2007 11 :33 13.2 01/18/2007 11:34 13.3 01/18/2007 11:35 13.3

F 

# =Unit Offline E 

# =Exceedance I 

# =Invalid M 

# =Maintenance 16,375,995.0 16,422,487.0 16,509.612.0 16.600,732.0 16,825,538.0 16.858,152.0 16,798,192.0 16,674,426.0 16.580,366.0 16.551,174.0 16.606,579.0 16.673,441.0 16,604,883.0 16.653,577.0 16,580,546.0 16,605,157.0 16,720.385.0 16.856.736.0 16.869,598.0 16.624.093.0 16,525,594.0 16,497.548.0 16.373.086.0 16,365.091.0 16,237,410.0 16,327,854.0 16.332,809.0 16,389.834.0 16,608,388.0 16.788.768.0 16,674,536.0 16,533,322.0 16.431,932.0 126.9**r.~** ";';'""';]1460 I 127.2 127.5

# J>;i:<;j}i~~=~ 

# :

127.6 127.8 128.2

# :~Jt'.i: 128.5 128.7 128.7 128.6 128.6 128.4 128.2 128.1 128.1 128.0 128.0 128.2 128.3 128.4 128.4 128.2 127.9 127.7 127.4 127.4 127.6 127.7 127.7 127.8 127.8 127.8 127.9

C 

# =Calibration 21.88 22.16 21.62 20.72 21.36 21.79 21.96 20.98 20.49 21.54 22.56 23.72 24.49 24.17 21.45 22.54 

# _E 22.68 22.52 24.90 31.19

32.57 29.28 24.46 22.73 23.84 22.77 21.45 21.13 23.33 21.72 21.31 22.23 275.4 275.9 276.2 276.4 276.6 276.8 276.9 276.8 276.8 276.7 276.6 276.6 276.7 276.8 276.9 277.0 277.2 277.3 277.4 277.3 277.3 277.2 277.2 277.0 276.9 276.7 276.6 276.5 276.6 276.8 276.7 276.6 276.5

Report Generated: 01/19/0708:28 Report Version 1.2.0829 RAnS-CEMS\\eSC5upport 30f9

# Average Data Plant: RATT Source: UNIT#1 Parameter: Multiole Parameters Report Period: 

### 01/18/2007 10:00 Through 

### 01/18/200714:30 Time Online Criteria: 

### 1 

### 01/18/2007 11:36 13.3 16,310,378.0 127.9 21.58 276.4 

### 01118/2007 11:37 13.3 16.362.244.0 128.0 21.29 276.3 

### 01118/2007 11:38 13.4 16.385.397.0 128.0 24.00 276.2 

### 01/18/2007 11:39 13.4 16,495.333.0 128.1 24.58 276.2 

### 01/18/2007 11:40 13.4 16.449.503.0 128.0 27.41 276.3 

### 01/18/2007 11:41 13.3 16.381,929.0 128.0 25.95 276.5 

### 01118/2007 11:42 13.2 16,369.136.0 128.1 24.87 276.6 

### 01/18/2007 11:43 13.2 16,574,720.0 127.9 23.67 276.8 

### 01/18/2007 11:44 13.2 16,770,214.0 127.8 21.75 277.0 

### 01/18/2007 11:45 13.2 16.691.070.0 127.7 21.55 277.0 

### 01/18/2007 11:46 13.1 16,491.851.0 127.7

. '. :,

..0. 3; I 23.66 276.8 

### 01/18/2007 11:47 13.1 16,421,474.0 127.9 26.21 276.7 

### 01/18/2007 11:48 13.1 16.309,400.0 128.0 26.71 276.6 

### 01/18/2007 11:49 13.3 16,179,632.0 127.1 22.56 276.4 

### 01/18/2007 11:50 13.3 16.081.739.0 126.4 22.60 276.3 

### 01/18/2007 11:51 13.4 16,126,054.0 126.2 21.12 276.2 

### 01/18/2007 11:52 ". 13.3 16.040.283.0 126.2 21.05

# ~.'~-:d"~'~~,a, I 276.1 

### 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 11:53 11:54 13.2 13.2 15.669,687.0 15.403.172.0 124.8 123.3 19.22 18.83

# ';tt~1111~~ 

# : 276.0 275.7 

### 01/1812007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 11:55 11:56 11:57 13.3 13.3 13.2 15.756.215.0 15,917,294.0 16.108,410.0 123.3 123.3 123.5

### '.;':"i'I",!I!~t~ r 'i"**',l:;,.'I'Wi~;;;·** d 

### .f"" ','" I" 

### lQ' I**~'~,!,; ~J:/[~** **m~t'i~i~r~'t·,** i,'**",J:"'i'~';O'41:2;** I 19.14 18.40 20.62 

# "":'11'**;·,~.t~-~~{~'·l;' >'~i:**  

# l1f'.r" Jltr**!.;;.,~~,** _', ,'_

.. 'f,r:"**(}"'.~;-** 

# .:.**';'''''1f~** I 275.6 275.5 275.3 

### 01/18/2007 11:58 13.1 16,064.353.0 124.8 20.14 275.1 

### 01/18/2007 11:59 13.2 15.878.223.0 125.0 19.96 275.0 

### 01/18/2007 12:00 13.3 15.858,773.0 125.0 20.08 274.8 

### 01118/2007 12:01 13.4 16,002.352.0 125.0 19.78 274.7 

### 01/18/2007 12:02 13.5 16.278,866.0 126.2 22.95 274.7 

### 01/18/2007 12:03 13.5 16.273,542.0 126.3 25.49 274.8 

### 01/18/2007 12:04 13.4 16.327,892.0 126.3 22.70 275.1 

### 01/18/2007 12:05 13.4 16.306,540.0 126.4 21.02 275.3 

### 01/18/2007 12:06 13.4 16,265.023.0 126.3 25.12 275.5 

### 01/18/2007 12:07 13.4 16,404.509.0 126.2 23.67 275.9 

### 01/18/2007 12:08 13.4 16,463.575.0 126.1 ,0: / •.

## n,a13 I 22.20 276.1



### F ::: Unit Offline E ::: Exceedance I ::: Invalid M ::: Maintenance C ::: Calibration Report Generated: 

### 01/19/0708:28 Report Version 1.2.0829 RATTS-CEMS\\escsupport 40f9

# Average Data Plant: RATI Source: UNIT#1 Parameter: Multiple Parameters Repqrt Period: 01/1812007 10:00 Through 01/18/2007 14:30 Time Online Criteria: 1 01/18/2007 12:09 13.4 16.394.501.0**126.4:{:]I~:,~!'~~** I 21.11 276.2 01/18/2007 12:10 13.4 16.162,589.0 126.3 ,;;
..**\.:i/i,O~4'tU** 20.37 276.0 01/18/2007 12:11 13.4 16,184,057.0

### 126.2·r;·';:!d{t~Y.!~:'1 20.29 275.7 01/18/2007 12:12 13.5 16,195,499.0 126.3**':::'(:q~** I 20.12 275.5 01/18/2007 12:13 13.5 16,119,621.0 126.1

## ':)Aii~~ji;el~'1 20.96 275.3 01/18/2007 12:14 n5 16.105,794.0**126.3P':;;,.;JliO~4$!fj** I 26.35 275.1 01/18/2007 12:15 24.27 275.1 01/18/2007 12:16 25.04 275.0 01/18/2007 12:17 21.34 275.0 01/18/2007 12:18

# ~1~**~~:m:~1~ jf:~**  

# ?ffil!

22.93 275.0 01/18/2007 12:.19 13.5 16,457,360.0 126.5**"F;:";:iir!itj;'41~'1** 21.65 ' 275.2**.;:I~'** ': :i'"t;4:iY/:.; ;z.; ,', 01/18/2007 12:20 13.5 16.516.690.0 126.5"**','i;,:;::I~Q;':47:~** I 19.81 275.3**.'i~"~,Y:~l~~~-,,(r-~-l;** 01/18/2007 12:21 13.5 16.456,490.0 126.8 """/':';l'iIf1&:1 24.04 275.4 01/18/2007 12:22 13.5 16,396.898.0 126.9

## :::';};,SJi~rPf~~~ 1 20.81 275.3 01/18/2007 12:23 13.5 16,062.929.0 126,0 ;':·."'1l475': I 19.80 275.1 .",**.~;:** -'.,**~l',.::i:'::** ::; '1!.' : 01/18/2007 12:24 13.5 16,029,938.0 125.7,'**:,r;kP;~:7~1** 19.91 275.0 ;\,;**',<,,;,:.~,,:!~** !Hr::' 01/18/2007 12:25 13.5 16,054.637.0 125.7 .,..•..**,.,·'~idl):~g~1** 19.94 274.8 01/18/2007 12:26 13.5 15.921.114.0

### 125.0~.·::.<'ii?8~liiBi, 20.87 274.7 01/18/2007 12:27 19.59 274.6 0111812007 12:28

# :~: 

# ;::::::::**:::~ ~~;f,i~l:**  18.62 274.4 01/18/2007 12:29 13.4 15.482.638.0**122,5~i:i:Ji*i;ql~B.1** 19.33 274.2 01/18/2007 12:30 18.56 1 274.1 01/18/2007 12:31

# ~:::**~::::::::::~ ~~~::** **;:~/·!.·'f;n~~~:** 18.51 'I 274.1 01/18/2007 12:32 13.3 15.827,638.0**122.1:",~';:<;;froi4781** 18.32 ,,1 274.1**;~»;;; ;n~:;~;.r~~·:,**  :"; : 01/18/2007 12:33 13.3 15.433,280.0**120.4i,;·,·;'lf~:~~~41** 19.06 274.0 01/18/2007 12:34 13.3 14.853.703.0 116.7

## /;::;i'S;iY~~f:g}~~" 17.71 J 273.7 0111812007 12:35 13.2 14,633.259.0 115.3 '",:",::;;,-,r;i!OA75,\ 18.76 I 273.3**<'":.-;;~~** i;',;!;.'.iJi}{F:Jf

### f;','.: 01/18/2007 12:36 13.2 14,781,489.0 115.9**cli;t~:'il>!;::i~~~7~** I 17.86 ;t:f:1 273.0 ;

....'::::;;.;.**:'~~;'>.:~'>IJ';** • 01/18/2007 12:37 13.1 14,818.841.0 116.7**'/.>,.}~.j~r,~1** 16.96 

## @, 272.7 01/18/2007 12:38 13.1 15,104.205.0 117.1 

### ,':;.'f};'if;::i:k47ZI 17.67 272.5**_'~** i;;/ ;;'[:jJ)"r:.:iJ;:,}.:<

..

# [.;~:' 01/18/2007 12:39 13.2 15,570.387.0 118.9;':·"iJ,;!,<OJI8S'1 18.26 ;91 272.4 01/18/2007 12:40 13.2 15.597.245.0 120.0

### ::~)i"l;~5&,~~,1 19.89 272.4

# :~··'::t{~~j:r:'\Q~,::. : 01/18/2007 12:41 13.3 15.563,070.0 119.9 

### """;::,0:459, I 19.57 272.4

F 

# =Unit Offline E 

# =Exceedance I 

# =Invalid M 

# =Maintenance 

### C 

# = Calibration Report Generated: 01/19/0708:28 Report Version 1.2.0829 RATIS-CEMS\\escsupport 50f9

# Average Data Plant: RAn Source: UNIT#1 Parameter: MultiDle Parameters Report Period: 01(1812007 10:00 Through 01(18(2007 14:30 Time Online Criteria: 1 01/18/2007 12:42 13.3 16,034,410.0 121.3 19.47 272.6 01/18/2007 12:43 13.4 16,092,945.0 122.0 19.24 272.9 01/18/2007 12:44 13.4 16,535,724.0 122.9

# ~~[iJ: 20.66 273.2 01/18/2007 12:45 13.4 16,433,724.0 123.4 ,-, ,/; () 443' I 20.69 273.5 01/18/2007 12:46 13.4 16,253,671.0 123.6 20.37 273.6 01/18/2007 12:47 13.4 16,100,014.0 123.7 20.70

# Jf~~~il: 273.7 01/18/2007 12:48 13.4 16,226,941.0 123.6 

### ,ft'!4t'\, I 20.42 273.6 01/18/2007 12:49 13.4 16,231,910.0 123.6 

# !4i4il 16.66 273.9 01/18/2007 12:50 13.3 16.124.956.0 123.7 16.77 274.0 01/18/2007 12:51 13.3 16,232.459.0 124.0

# k.,,:·tj:J:;iy,·:~fln' : 20.04 274.1 01/18/2007 12:52 13.3 16,307,932.0 124.3 

# .::!:**"i~:;;;~~'6f~4i** I 21.26 274.3 01/18/2007 12:53 13.3 16,339,493.0 124.4 ',', 21.83 274.4 01/18/2007 12:54

### ,~;~:IC**T:l;t'~!~~()** IC 124.5 21.60 .•**'~',.** ," h:" r })-li**~,;~! _~L;~,t?f**  ("tL 01/18/2007 12:55 !IIC**",(;'3:~z;~'M;lS:IC** 124.6 22.34 01/18/2007 12:56 

## :IC

# :,~,;~i~~W~,C 124.5 19.77 0111812007 12:57 IC

### it~r"lW)~'lii:thc 124.4 .,f.:**t~'I·t':""** 20.61 

### )!f1!"I,."p. I.IU;'Itl!!, d'ir"lc: 01/18/2007 12:58 

## IC**j"'H.ili!J~~,\lIC** 124.7 19.76 !!Ui'l-ii'ilUI!il'@!;:, 01/18/2007 12:59 

## IC**i'li18~MJ;i~'IO,** 

## IC 124.7 21.06 01/18/2007 13:00 

# i)6;o IC 124.6

# ~!g~1!~I~~ IC ;;;.' '. 21.96

### ·'J":"~'F.9fj".**.i~** 'C 01/18/2007 13:01 13.3 16.356.246.0 125.0 20.90

# ~1~~~~i';frt;'~~ I 272.7 0111812007 13:02 13.3 16,325,662.0 125.0 .\ 20.15 274.0

# ~"~~**;~rJ'1** 01/18/2007 13:03 13.3 16,333,149.0 125.1 I 20.70 274.6 0111812007 13:04 13.3 16,336,455.0 124.6 19.97 275.3 01/18/2007 13:05 13.3 16,399,924.0 124.6 20.53 275.6 01/18/2007 13:06 13.3 16,462.665.0 125.0 20.56 275.9 01/18/2007 13:07 13.3 16.577.096.0 125.0 20.31 276.3 01/18/2007 13:08 13.3 16,565,736.0 125.2 22.09 276.5 01/18/2007 13:09 13.2 16.020,627.0 123.3 19.36 276.4 01/18/2007 13:10 13.2 15.766,967.0 121.7 16.60 276.1 01/18/2007 13:11 13.2 15,651.765.0 122.0 19.73 275.6 01/18/2007 13:12 13.1 16.117,490.0 123.0 19.60 275.5 01/18/2007 13:13 13.1 15.966.965.0 123.7 19.22 275.3 01/18/2007 13:14 13.2 15.606,696.0 122.9 16.69 275.1

F 

# =Unit Offline E 

# =Exceedance I 

# =Invalid M 

# =Maintenance C 

# =Calibration

# :'i~~~~

"

Report Generated: 01/19/07 08:28 Report Version 1.2.0829 RAnS-CEMS\\escsupport 6of9

# Average Data Plant: RATT Source: UNIT#1 Parameter: Multiole Parameters Report Period: 01/1812007 10:00 Through 01/18/2007 14:30 Time Online Criteria: 1 01/18/2007 13:15 13.2 15,782,162.0 122.2 19.40 274.9 01/18/2007 13:16 13.2 15.938,351.0 122.3 19.31 274.6 01/18/2007 13:17 13.1 16,104,288.0 123.3 19.22 274.4 01/18/2007 13:18 13.2 16,239,138.0 123.4 19.91 274.5 01/18/2007 13:19 13.2 16,297,255.0 123.4 19.48 274.4 01/18/2007 13:20 13.2 16,247,369.0 123.4 18.37 274.3 01/18/2007 13:21 13.2 16,147,512.0 123.2 19.09 274.0 01/18/2007 13:22 13.2 15,988.081.0 123.3 17.95 273.8 01/18/2007 13:23 13.2 15,952,006.0 123.1**·;;:.·'·;:~;ip;.41911** 18.65 273.7 01/18/2007 13:24 13.2 16,250,482.0 124.2

## .(:,!.~~£g~9h4¥~'1 19.99 273.6 01/18/2007 13:25 13.2 16,210,157.0 124.6 18.67 273.7 01118/2007 13:26 13.3 16,247,747.0 124.5 19.73 273.7 01/18/2007 13:27 13.4 16,183,110.0 124.6 19.68 273.8 01/18/2007 13:28 13.4 16,246,452.0 124.8 19.07 273.9 01/18/2007 13:29 13.4 16,402,197.0 124.9 19.08 274.2 01118/2007 13:30 13.4 16,518,335.0 124.8 19.66 274.4 01/18/2007 13:31 , 13.3 16,476,976.0 124.8 19.85 274.6 01/18/2007 13:32 13.3 16,326,960.0 124.6 18.92 274.6 01/18/2007 13:33 13.3 16,338,197.0 124.8 20.67 274.6 01/18/2007 13:34 13.3 16,170,797.0 124.8 18.64 274,5 01/18/2007 13:35 13.3 16,209,559.0 124.8 19.75 274.6 01/18/2007 13:36 13.3 16,250,592.0 125.0 20.02 274.6 01/18/2007 13:37 13.4 16,232,434.0 125.2 18.84 274.7 01/18/2007 13:38 1 3.4 16,324,116.0 125.2 19.48 274.9 01/18/2007 13:39 13.4 16,155,674.0 125.3 20.21 274.9 01/18/2007 13:40 13.4 16,397,497.0 125.5 19.57 275.2 01/18/2007 13:41 13.4 16,589,166.0 125.5 19.23 275.4 01/18/2007 13:42 13.4 16,634,958.0 125.5 19.97 275.5 

## '.' 01/18/2007 13:43 13.4 16,363,735.0 125.6 19.56 275.5 01/18/2007 13:44 13.4 16,258,645.0 125.5 19.21 275,4 01/18/2007 13:45 13.4 16,209,551.0 125.3 19.86 275.3 01/18/2007 13:46 13.4 16,283,894.0 125.3 19.62 275,2 

### .: : 

### :' 01/18/2007 13:47 13.4 16,185,839.0 125.3 21.08 275.2

F 

# =Unit Offline E 

# =Exceedance I 

# =Invalid M 

# =Maintenance C 

# = Calibration

# ··;;;j!~jhV~~~tll**:';-'i!rL''''LiiS'J~Si** I**,v;t:'.;~~:;;;~~t~;L"'n'** .

Report Generated: 01/19/07 08:28 Report Version 1.2.0829 RATTS-CEMS\\escsupport 7 af9

# Average Data Plant: RAn Source: UNIT#1 Parameter: Multiole Parameters Report Period: 0111812007 10:00 Through 0111812007 14:30 Time Online Criteria: 1 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 

### 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 

### 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 

### 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 

### 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 01/18/2007 

### 13:48 13:49 13:50 13:51 13:52 13:53 13:54 13:55 13:56 13:57 13:58 13:59 14:00 14:01 14:02 14:03 14:04 14:05 14:06 14:07 14:08 14:09 14:10 14:11 14:12 14:13 14:14 14:15 14:16 14:17 14:18 14:19 14:20

# ~~:**::::::~** 

# ::::**'~Ii:** 13.4 16.325.519.0 125.5**.""';'::;iO~~91**

13.4 16.180.975.0

### 124.9··>::'::Jh;~o I 13.4 16,426.435.0 124.8 

### "::(';':"H" "". " 13.4 16.547.814.0 124.9 13.3 16.445.964.0 124.9 13.3 16.282.807.0 125.2 13.4 16.131.319.0 125.1 

# , 13.4 16.089.075.0 125.0 13.4 16.079.225.0 124.8 13.4 16.122.427.0 124.9 13.3 16.104.110.0 124.9 13.3 16.201.814.0 124.9 13.4 16.176.998.0 124.9 13.4 16.304.205.0 125.0 13.4 16.478,446.0 125.0 13.4 16.537.013.0 124.9 13.4 16.346.795.0 124.8 13.3 16.262.360.0 124.6 13.3 15.999.293.0 124.6 

# iill:

13.3 16.024.168.0 124.5 19.21 19.59 19,56 20.51 18.70 19.08 21.11 23.20 19.90 20.39 18.86 19.99 20.08 20.51 18.58 20.09 18.35 18.97 19.64 19.79 18.30 19.65 19.44 19.40 19.70 18.66 19.12 19.87 18.26 18.88 19.46 19.63 19.80 275.2 275.1 275.1 275.3 275.4 275.6 275.4 275.2 275.1 I 274.9 I 274.8 I 274.8 I 274.7 274.7 274.7 I 274.9 275.0 275.0 275.0 274.9 274.9 :1 274.8 I 274.7 I 274.7 

# , 274.7 I 274.7 274.8 275.0 275.1 275.1 274.9 274.8 274.7



## • F 

## = Unit Offline E 

## = Exceedance I 

# =Invalid M 

### = Maintenance C 

# =Calibration Report Generated: 01/19/07 08:28 

### Report Version 1.2.0829 RAnS-CEMS\\escsupport 8 of 9**-------~----------**



### Plant Name: Hooiser General Average Report Reporting Period: 

### 12/15/2006 to 

### 01/23/2007 Site Name: HG_ TEST Data Average: 1 hr
HG_T 

### Date Time (uglm 3 )



### 1/18/2007 0:00 

## 4.8 1 :00 

## 4.5 2:00 

## 4.5 3:00 4.4 4:00 

## 4.8 5:00 

## 4.8 6:00 5.0 7:00 5.0 8:00 

## 4.8 9:00 4.6 Status Flag



### Sorbent Tube Sam lin Period

< 

### 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 

## 4.8 5.0 5.0 

## 4.9 4.8 

## 4.7 16:00 4.9 17:00 4.7 18:00 

## 4.8 19:00 4.6 20:00 

## 4.5 21:00 22:00 4.1 23:00 4.2