alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **Subchapter B—Other Offenses**

Sec.
7261.
Representation that retailers' excise tax is excluded from price of article.
7262.
Violation of occupational tax laws relating to wagering—failure to pay special tax.
[7263 to 7267. Repealed.]
7268.
Possession with intent to sell in fraud of law or to evade tax.
7269.
Failure to produce records.
7270.
Insurance policies.
7271.
Penalties for offenses relating to stamps.
7272.
Penalty for failure to register or reregister.
7273.
Penalties for offenses relating to special taxes.
[7274.
Repealed.]
7275.
Penalty for offenses relating to certain airline tickets and advertising.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11164(b)(4), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1976, inserted "or reregister" after "register" in item 7272.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1904(b)(7)(C)(ii), (8)(E)(ii), (9)(C)(ii), 1952(n)(3)(B), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1815, 1816, 1846, struck out items 7263 "Penalties relating to cotton futures", 7264 "Offenses relating to renovated or adulterated butter", 7265 "Other offenses relating to oleomargarine or adulterated butter operations", 7267 "Offenses relating to white phosphorus matches", and 7274 "Penalty for offenses relating to white phosphorus matches".

**1974**—Pub. L. 93–490, §3(b)(4), Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1467, struck out item 7266 "Offenses relating to filled cheese".

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–258, title II, §203(c)(2), May 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 239, added item 7275.

**1965**—Pub. L. 89–44, title VI, §601(i), June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 155, struck out item 7275 "Failure to print correct price on tickets".
#### § 3862.4 Publication of notice.
### §4472. Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter—

#### (1) Covered voyage

#### (A) In general

The term "covered voyage" means a voyage of—

(i) a commercial passenger vessel which extends over 1 or more nights, or

(ii) a commercial vessel transporting passengers engaged in gambling aboard the vessel beyond the territorial waters of the United States,

during which passengers embark or disembark the vessel in the United States. Such term shall not include any voyage on any vessel owned or operated by the United States, a State, or any agency or subdivision thereof.

#### (B) Exception for certain voyages on passenger vessels

The term "covered voyage" shall not include a voyage of a passenger vessel of less than 12 hours between 2 ports in the United States.

#### (2) Passenger vessel

The term "passenger vessel" means any vessel having berth or stateroom accommodations for more than 16 passengers.

(Added Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7504(a), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2362.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4472 was contained in subchapter C of this chapter prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–44, title IV, §404, June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 149.
### §5101. Notice of manufacture of still; notice of set up of still

#### (a) Notice requirements

#### (1) Notice of manufacture of still

The Secretary may, pursuant to regulations, require any person who manufactures any still, boiler, or other vessel to be used for the purpose of distilling, to give written notice, before the still, boiler, or other vessel is removed from the place of manufacture, setting forth by whom it is to be used, its capacity, and the time of removal from the place of manufacture.

#### (2) Notice of set up of still

The Secretary may, pursuant to regulations, require that no still, boiler, or other vessel be set up without the manufacturer of the still, boiler, or other vessel first giving written notice to the Secretary of that purpose.

#### (b) Penalties, etc.

**(1) For penalty and forfeiture for failure to give notice of manufacture, or for setting up a still without first giving notice, when required by the Secretary, see sections 5615(2) and 5687.**

**(2) For penalty and forfeiture for failure to register still or distilling apparatus when set up, see section 5601(a)(1) and 5615(1).**

(Added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §451(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 818.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5101, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1339, contained provisions relating to imposition and rate of tax, prior to the general revision of this subpart by Pub. L. 98–369.

Another prior section 5101, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 617, related to special tax on manufacturers of stills, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §456, July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 823, as amended by Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1845, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2856, provided that:

"(a) In General.—Except as otherwise provided in this section the amendments made by this part [part II (§§451–456) of subtitle D of title IV of div. A of Pub. L. 98–369, enacting this section and section 5102 of this title, amending sections 5005, 5062, 5066, 5116, 5134, 5179, 5204, 5206, 5207, 5214, 5215, 5235, 5301, 5354, 5555, 5604, 5613, 5615, 5691, 6103, 6801, and 7213 of this title, repealing section 5205 of this title, and omitting sections 5103, 5105, and 5106 of this title] shall take effect on the first day of the first calendar month which begins more than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 18, 1984].

"(b) Repeal of Stamp Requirement.—The amendments made by section 454 [amending sections 5062, 5066, 5116, 5204, 5206, 5207, 5215, 5235, 5301, 5555, 5604, 5613, and 6801 of this title and repealing section 5205 of this title] shall take effect on July 1, 1985.

"(c) Fortification of Cooking Wine.—The amendments made by section 455 [amending sections 5005, 5214, and 5354 of this title] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [July 18, 1984].

"(d) Section 452.—The amendment made by section 452 [amending section 5134 of this title] shall apply to products manufactured or produced after October 31, 1984."
§ 3422.4 Award of lease. ( a ) After the authorized officer has accepted a high qualified bid, and the Attorney General has not objected to lease issuance or the procedures in § 3422.3-4(e)(2) of this title have been completed, the authorized officer shall send 4 copies of the lease form to the successful bidder. The successful bidder shall complete, sign and return these forms and shall: pay the balance of the bonus bid, if required; pay the first year's rental; pay the proportionate share of the cost of publishing the notice of sale; and file a lease bond. Upon receipt of the above, the authorized officer shall execute the lease.
( b ) If the successful bidder dies before the lease is issued, the provisions of § 3472.2-4 of this title shall apply.
( c ) At least half of the acreage offered for competitive lease in any 1 year shall be offered on a deferred bonus payment basis. In a deferred bonus payment, the lessee shall pay the bonus in 5 equal installments; the first installment shall be submitted with the bid. The balance shall be paid in equal annual installments due and payable on the next 4 anniversary dates of the lease. If a lease is relinquished or otherwise cancelled or terminated, the unpaid remainder of the bid shall be immediately payable to the United States.
( d ) If the successful bidder fails to comply with any requirement of paragraph (a) of this section or of § 3422.3-4 of this title, the deposit on the successful bid shall be forfeited to the United States.
( e ) If the lease cannot be awarded for reasons determined by the authorized officer to be beyond the control of the successful bidder, the deposit submitted with the bid shall be refunded.
[47 FR 33141, July 30, 1982]
**
Black Dispatches: Black American Contributions             to Union Intelligence During the Civil War*By: P. K. Rose*
  Return to Publications Page
 Reprint of article from Studies In Intelligence, a journal published by     CIA's Center for the Study of Intelligence.

**
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                        EXHIBIT 11


                BANKERS LIFE HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share
                                   (unaudited)


                                                                     Three months ended      Nine months     Six months
                                                                        September 30,           ended          ended
                                                                      ------------------     September 30,     June 30,
                                                                      1996          1995          1996           1995
                                                                      ----          ----     -------------   -----------
                                                                                                             (prior basis)
   <S>                                                              <C>           <C>          <C>            <C>    
   Shares outstanding, beginning of period......................    49,326,340    52,837,326   50,597,758     52,782,700
     Weighted average shares issued (retired) during the period:
     Employee defined contribution plan.........................                         357                      36,715
     Exercise of stock options (1)..............................        41,653            -        14,591             -
     Shares acquired and effectively retired (2)................             -      (541,222)  (1,213,634)            -
     Common stock equivalents related to stock options..........        80,058            -        24,297             -
                                                                   -----------   -----------  -----------    ----------- 

         Weighted average shares outstanding ...................    49,448,051    52,296,461   49,423,012     52,819,415
                                                                   ===========   ===========  ===========    ===========

     Net income ................................................   $32,096,563   $30,693,000  $94,342,768    $60,241,000
                                                                   ===========   ===========  ===========    ===========

         Net income per common share............................          $.65          $.59        $1.91          $1.14
                                                                          ====          ====        =====          =====
<FN>

(1)  Bankers issued 99,700 shares during the nine months ended September 30, 1996 upon the exercise of stock options.

(2)  Bankers purchased 1,272,248 common shares during the nine months ended September 30, 1996.
</FN>
</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-10624

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:08-00356-WSD-ECS-13

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

ZULEY SANCHEZ,

 Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(August 15, 2012)

Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

Jeff P. Manciagli, retained counsel for Zuley Sanchez in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

Case: 12-10624 Date Filed: 08/15/2012 Page: 1 of 2 
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sanchez’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 12-10624 Date Filed: 08/15/2012 Page: 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Cell Wireless Corporation
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
John Bohringer, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, hereby certify that:

The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 2nd day of June
2005.


By: /s/ John Bohringer
    ------------------
    John Bohringer
    President
TN REPLY REFER TO: 

MP-3400 MAR o 1 202r:·· 

2.2.4.21 

To: All Central Valley Project Water Contractors 

Subject: Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Water Deliveries and Charges by Month for Central Valley 

Project (CVP) Water (Action by March 31, 2023) 

Dear Water Contractor: 

Enclosed is a summary of your water deliveries with corresponding charges for FY 2022, which 

cover the period October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022. The summary and review of each 

contractor's annual water deliveries and charges is the initial step in the process to prepare the 

FY 2022 Annual Accounting Analysis for each CVP Irrigation and Municipal & Industrial water 

contractor. The amount delivered (in acre-feet) is shown by month, with the total computed 

charges by water type. This infonnation is based on data recorded in the Bureau of Reclamation 

Water Operations & Record Keeping System (BORWORKS) by our area offices. 

Your review of the deliveries and charges is very important. Identifying correct deliveries affects 

the allocation of cost for all CVP contractors receiving similar services to you. Please review 

page 2 of this letter and indicate whether the information is correct. If any discrepancies are 

identified, please contact the appropriate Reclamation area office for resolution prior to 

submitting final comments to the Ratesetting Services Branch. 

Responses are requested in our office by March 31, 2023. After your review of the information, 

please return page 2 of this letter either by mail in the enclosed self-addressed postage-paid 

envelope or email to indicate whether the delivery and charge information is correct. Any 

discrepancies reported will be reviewed and you will be contacted to discuss any potential 

adjustments that may be necessary. 

If you have any questions, please contact Mrs. Kristin Johnson, Ratesetting Team Lead at 916-

978-5507, via e-mail at kjohnson@usbr.gov, or by TTY utilizing the Federal Relay System at 

800-877-8339. 

Sincerely, 

Christiane Washington 

Acting Financial Manager 

Enclosures - 3 

INTERIOR REGION 10 • CALIFORNIA-GREAT BASIN 

CALIFORNIA*, NEVADA". OREGON" 

'PART!Al 

United States Depart1nent of the Interior 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 

2800 Cottage Way 

Sacramento, CA 95825-1898 
Please check the appropriate response below and return this portion of the letter to the Bureau of 

Reclamation via mail or e-mail to kjohnson@usbr.gov. 

Contractor name and number: 

Point of Contact: -

Please Print 

Name Phone Number 

The delivery verification spreadsheets are correct. 

The delivery verification spreadsheets are not correct as noted below, and 

I have contacted my area office to resolve the discrepancies. 

Central California Area Office Ms. Kellye Kennedy 

Phone: 916-537-7050 

E-Mail: kkennedy@usbr.gov 

Northern California Area Office Mr. Jacob Berens 

Phone: 530-892-6203 

E-Mail: jberens@usbr.gov 

Ms. Yesenia Sigala 

Phone: 530-892-6242 

E-Mail: ysigala@usbr.gov 

South-Central California Area Office Mr. Richard Reyes 

Phone: 559-262-0352 

E-mail: rereyes@usbr.gov 

Mr. Moses Prieto 

Phone: 559-262-0349 • 

E-mail: mprieto@usbr.gov
From: Mathias, Scott Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 9:52 AM To: Szabo, Aaron Cc: Pepple, Karl Subject: RE: EO 12866_13563 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP) Final Rule Attachments: 1-26-15 EO12866_Ozone SIP Req_2060-AR34_Final_PreambleRule_20141006 - contains edits from OMB_clean rlso.docx

Aaron,
The attached redlined version of the Ozone SIP Requirements SRR contains the following edits: 1) Edits resulting from the written comments OMB provided to EPA. These are labeled with comment bubbles as:

a. OMB general comments, b. OMB specific comments, and

c. OMB typographical comments; 2)Nearly all edits necessary to reflect the results of the recent NRDC decision regarding the 2012 ozone implementation rule’s treatment of attainment dates and revoking the 1997 NAAQS for purposes of transportation conformity only (see note below); 3) Edit to Table 1 acknowledging that another nonattainment area has been redesignated to attainment 4) Edits resulting from discussion with OMB and inter-agency partners on 1/23/15 regarding EPA’s responses to the prior written comments. 5) Edits from an additional December 2014 review by EPA OGC staff. Note: This version does not yet contain a new preamble (perhaps section III.Y) and accompanying regulatory text changes to 40 CFR 51.1103 to establish the attainment deadlines consistent with the recent NRDC decision. That language will be added after further internal EPA discussions with counsel. Scott Mathias | Associate Director, Air Quality Policy Division | U.S. EPA, RTP, NC 27711 | 919.541.5310
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jorge Tomas Pina-Salazar, Appellant

No. 06-22-00022-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 102nd District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

21F0386-102). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice 

Stevens and Justice van Cleef participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment modify the 

judgment herein by striking the entire line that begins “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN.” As 

modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Jorge Tomas Pina-Salazar, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 12, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
BankUnited Financial Corporation, a Florida corporation (the Company), for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on or about the date hereof (the
Report), I, Humberto L. Lopez, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|SENIOR EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                                                           
|/s/ Humberto L. Lopez                                      
|Humberto L. Lopez                                          

Dated: August 9, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>


<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                       19,113,249
<SECURITIES>                                  1,996,709
<RECEIVABLES>                                   169,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             21,433,703
<PP&E>                                        1,492,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                  726,658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               23,713,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           714,888
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                         117
<COMMON>                                         46,855
<OTHER-SE>                                   22,671,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 23,713,766
<SALES>                                         343,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                343,024
<CGS>                                           761,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   761,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              6,702,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               37,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (7,018,963)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (7,018,963)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (7,018,963)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (2.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (2.48)


</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published except under the limited circumstances set forth

in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 95-30330

Summary Calendar

_______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

BRIAN KEITH SCOTT,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(94-84)

_________________________

June 27, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Brian Scott challenges his sentence for possession with intent

to distribute cocaine base. He argues that the statutory penalties

for cocaine base and cocaine offenses are sufficiently ambiguous as

to warrant the application of the rule of lenity. We have recently

decided this issue adversely to Scott’s contentions. See, e.g.,
2

United States v. Martin, No. 95-30335 (5th Cir. Feb. 5, 1996) (per

curiam) (unpublished); United Stztes v. Lewis, No. 95-60131 (5th

Cir. Oct. 19. 1995) (per curiam) (unpublished); United States v.

Lampkin, No. 95-30131 (5th Cir. Aug. 25, 1995) (unpublished).

AFFIRMED.
### §450j. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 450j was editorially reclassified as section 5324 of this title.