alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, October 13, 2004, 9 a.m. to October 13, 2004, 5 p.m., Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 27, 2004, 69 FR 57709.                

The meeting will now be held on October 19, 2004, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the Holiday Inn Select Bethesda. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 4, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-22660 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 4.621 When may the Department or other agency file an answer? ( a ) Within 30 days after service of an application, the Department or other agency against which an award is sought may file an answer to the application. However, if consideration of an application has been stayed under § 4.613(b), the answer is due within 30 days after the final disposition of the review or reconsideration of the decision. ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, failure to file an answer within the 30-day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested. In such case, the adjudicative officer will issue a decision in accordance with § 4.625 based on the record before him or her.
( 2 ) Failure to file an answer within the 30-day period will not be treated as a consent to the award requested if the Department or other agency either: ( i ) Requests an extension of time for filing; or
( ii ) Files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) If the Department or other agency and you believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, you may jointly file a statement of intent to negotiate a settlement. Filing this statement will extend for an additional 30 days the time for filing an answer, and the adjudicative officer may grant further extensions if you and the agency counsel so request.
( c ) The answer must explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on to support the Department's or other agency's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the Department or other agency must include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 4.624.
#### § 3809.313 Under what circumstances may I not begin operations 15 calendar days after filing my notice?

To see when you may not begin operations 15 calendar days after filing your notice, follow this table:

| If BLM reviews your notice and, within 15 calendar days— | Then— |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Notifies you that BLM needs additional time, not to exceed 15 calendar days, to complete its review | You must not begin operations until the additional review time period ends. |
| (b) Notifies you that you must modify your notice to prevent unnecessary or undue degradation | You must not begin operations until you modify your notice to ensure that your operations prevent unnecessary or undue degradation. |
| (c) Requires you to consult with BLM about the location of existing or proposed access routes | You must not begin operations until you consult with BLM and satisfy BLM's concerns about access. |
| (d) Determines that an on-site visit is necessary | You must not begin operations until BLM visits the site, and you satisfy any concerns arising from the visit. BLM will notify you if we will not conduct the site visit within 15 calendar days of determining that a visit is necessary, including the reason(s) for the delay. |
| (e) BLM determines you don't qualify under § 3809.11 as a notice-level operation | You must file a plan of operations before beginning operations. See §§ 3809.400 through 3809.420. |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arturo LOPEZ-NINO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41309.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 6, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Kathlyn Giannaula Snyder, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Arturo Lopez-Nino appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his sentence should be vacated and remanded because the district court sentenced him under the mandatory guidelines scheme held unconstitutional in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

The district court committed *“Fanfan”*error by sentencing Lopez-Nino pursuant to a mandatory guidelines scheme. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir.2005). Although LopezNino contends that such error is structural, this argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent. *See id.*at 463.

The Government concedes that LopezNino preserved his *Fanfan*claim. As such, this court reviews the claim for harmless error. *See id.*at 464. There is no indication in the record that the district court would have imposed the same sentence had the guidelines been advisory rather than mandatory. Accordingly, we VACATE the sentence and REMAND for resentencing in accordance with *Booker.*

Lopez-Nino also challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Lopez-Nino contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *AlmendarezTorres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d *862435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Lopez-Nino properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, Lopez-Nino’s conviction is AFFIRMED.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 428

 436

 430

 420

 431

 435

 420

 419

 418

 411

 405

 403

 417

 417

 429

 441

 427

 419

 418

 405

 401

 399

 399

 389

 392

 406

 424

 434

 443

 458

 464

 409

 403

 402

 409

 411

 415

 400

 392

 384

 377

 374

 373

 379

 383

 386

 387

 388

 394

 393

 387

 376

 363

 363

 365

 368

 382

 395

 408

 421

 435

 448

 419

 415

 410

 413

 420

 423

 413

 403

 399

 390

 387

 384

 393

 394

 401

 404

 398

 399

 401

 397

 388

 380

 375

 376

 383

 397

 410

 421

 432

 446

 454

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Explore Wildflowers at Cedar Sink

Mammoth Cave National Park
#### § 3864.1-5 Fees.

An applicant for a millsite patent must pay fees as described in § 3860.1.

[70 FR 58880, Oct. 7, 2005]
Carl Daly 

COLORADO 

Department of Public 

Health & Environment 

Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 

Air Program Director 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver, CO 80202-112 9 

31 March 2015 

Dear Mr. Daly, 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has noted a deficiency in Colorado's Annual Network 

Monitoring Plan that must be addressed prior to approval of Colorado's 2010 Infrastructure SIP for N02 

(and 2008 Infrastructure SIP for ozone). The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, 

Air Pollution Control Division (APCD), acknowledges that 40 CFR Part 58.10(a)(5)(iv) requires a " second 

near-road N02 monitor in any CBSA with a population of 2,500,000 or more persons, or a second 

monitor in any CBSA with a population of 500,000 or more persons that has one or more roadway 

segments with 250,000 or greater AADT counts" by January 1, 2015. This second site was addressed in 

Colorado's 2014 Annual Network Plan submitted to EPA on 1 July 2014, as required by CFR, and 

approved by EPA on 13 March 2015. 

With approval of the location having been received, the APCD commits to installing the second nearroad site in Denver at 1-25 and 49th Avenue by 31 December 2015. This location was selected following 

the criteria established in 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Section 4.3, and following on-site visits with EPA 

staff. We will notify EPA as soon as it is operational. 

If you have any questions, please contact me at (303) 692-3114 or at william.allison@state.co.us 

Director, Air Pollution 

~ Control Division 

cc. Abby Fulton, EPA (email) 

Monica Morales, EPA (email) 

Richard Payton, EPA (email) 

Chris Colclasure, APCD (email) 

Gordon Pierce, APCD (email) 

4300 Cherry Creek Drive 5., Denver, CO 80246-1530 P 303-692-2000 www.colorado.gov/ cdphe 

John W. Hickenlooper, Governor 1 Larry Walk, MD, MSPH, Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Spanish Missions/Misiones Españolas





Contact Us
  The Significance of Spanish Colonial Missions in our National Story and our Common Heritage with Spain, Mexico and Latin America
 Página en español
 Living history reenactors dressed in 16th-century period clothing are a highlight of the annual Cabrillo Festival.Living history reenactors dressed in 16th-century period clothing are a highlight of the annual Cabrillo Festival. NPS photo. Book of Prophecies Cristo Ferens 
 Universalis Ecclesiae (Of the Universal Church)
 Aerial view of Acoma atop the mesa.Aerial view of Acoma atop the mesa. Photo by Marshall Henrie. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
 Map of the northernmost portion of El Camino Real.Map of the northernmost portion of El Camino Real. NPS map from El Camino Real de la Tierra Adentro National Historic Trail.
 What gives the missions their permanency is the aid which they receive from the Catholic arms. Without them pueblos are frequently abandoned, and ministers are murdered.... It is seen every day that in missions where there are no soldiers there is no success.... Soldiers are necessary to defend the Indian from the enemy, and to keep an eye on the mission Indians, now to encourage them, now to carry news to the nearest presidio in case of trouble. For the spiritual and temporal progress of the missions two soldiers are needed...especially in new conversions.[1]
 Jesuit expulsionJesuit missionaries from the first contact made by Father Kino and the O'odham Indians in 1691 until the Jesuit Expulsion ordered by King Carlos III in 1767. Courtesy of the National Park Service.
 Mission San José de TumacácoriO'odham Circle Dance at the Fiesta de Tumacácori held at the park annually. Courtesy of the National Park Service.
 [1] John Francis Bannon, editor, *Bolton and the Spanish Borderlands* (1964), pp. 201-202.
 
 Discover our Shared Heritage Travel Itinerary Program Frequently Asked Questions
 **^TOP**
 Last updated: April 15, 2016
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
§ 3863.1 Placer mining claim patent applications: General. ( a ) The proceedings to obtain patents for placer claims, including all forms of mineral deposits excepting veins of quartz or other rock in place, are similar to the proceedings prescribed for obtaining patents for vein or lode claims; but where a placer claim shall be upon surveyed lands, and conforms to legal subdivisions, no further survey or plat will be required. Where placer claims cannot be conformed to legal subdivisions, survey and plat shall be made as on unsurveyed lands.
( b ) The price of placer claims is fixed at $2.50 per acre or fractional part of an acre.
( c ) An applicant for a placer mining claim patent must pay fees as described in § 3860.1.
[35 FR 9758, June 13, 1970, as amended at 70 FR 58880, Oct. 7, 2005]
II 

Calendar No. 564 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4893 

[Report No. 117–212] 

To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to require certain disclosures 

by registrants regarding exemptions under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2022 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 17, 2022 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to require 

certain disclosures by registrants regarding exemptions 

under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as 

amended. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4893 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lobbying Disclosure 

3 Improvement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REGISTRANT DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN 

5 AGENT REGISTRATION EXEMPTION. 

6 Section 4(b) of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 

7 (2 U.S.C. 1603(b)) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

9 inserting a semicolon; 

10 (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at 

11 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(8) a statement as to whether the registrant is 

14 exempt under section 3(h) of the Foreign Agents 

15 Registration Act of 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 

16 613(h)).’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 564 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4893 

[Report No. 117–212] 

A BILL 

To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to 

istration Act of 1938, as amended. ing exemptions under the Foreign Agents Regrequire certain disclosures by registrants regardNOVEMBER 17, 2022 

Reported without amendment 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection with the Annual Report of Star E Media Corp. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-KSB  for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about April 16, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Ghaby  "Gabriel"  Nassar,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  Information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  April  16,  2003                            /s/ Gabriel Nassar
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Gabriel  Nassar
                                                   Chief  Executive  Officer


A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Star E Media Corp. and will be retained by Star E Medial Corp. and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 3902.28 Attorneys-in-fact.

Attorneys-in-fact must provide to the proper BLM office evidence of the authority to act on behalf of the applicant and a statement of the applicant's qualifications and acreage holdings if it is also empowered to make this statement. Otherwise, the applicant must provide the BLM this information separately.
IRR 2006 Sch A-2B1 F.Z08.XLS

9/23/2005

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

ACCUMULATED IRRIGATION CAPITAL RELIEF DUE TO ABILITY-TO-PAY LIMITATION

2006 IRRIGATION WATER RATES

Start of Cumulative Capital Relief Fiscal Year 2004 Fiscal Year 20

Facility/Contractor Relief Fiscal Years 1992 - 2003 Irrigation Capital Rates Delivered Irrigation Water Capital Relie

(2005 Irrigation Water Rates) (2004 Irrigation Water Rates) (2006 Irrigation Water Rates)

(Schedule A-2B1) (Schedule A-2Ba) (Schedule B-2)

Black Butte D&R

 Stony Creek WD 10/01/93 26,804 3.17 805 2,55Clear Creek Unit Clear Creek CSD 02/21/95 373,445 9.48 4,721 44,75Corning Canal Corning WD 10/01/93 1,418,047 15.21 10,056 152,95 Elder Creek WD 1/ 10/01/93 17,125 

 Proberta WD 10/01/93 309,740 13.63 3,649 49,73 Thomes Creek WD 10/01/93 305,900 10.83 3,068 33,22Cow Creek Unit

 Bella Vista WD 02/21/95 911,548 10.25 14,476 148,37New Melones Unit Stockton East WD 2/ 06/01/97 35,279 

 Central San Joaquin WCD 06/01/97 378,366 2.67 13,605 36,32Sacramento River - Willows

 Natomas Central MWC 3/ 06/01/00

 Pelger MWC 3/ 06/01/00 Sutter MWC 3/ 06/01/00Tehama Colusa Canal

 4 - M WD 10/01/93 132,136 6.47 2,057 13,30 Colusa County WD 10/01/93 4,743,062 13.25 39,467 522,93 Cortina WD 10/01/93 72,516 10.32 1,151 11,87 Davis WD 10/01/93 142,377 9.41 2,560 24,09 Dunnigan WD 10/01/93 1,142,207 9.54 14,429 137,65 Glenn Valley WD 10/01/93 53,336 6.58 977 6,42 Glide WD 10/01/93 665,613 7.50 10,500 78,75 Holthouse WD 10/01/93 91,923 7.10 1,780 12,63 Kanawha WD 10/01/93 2,906,807 8.96 36,977 331,31 Kirkwood WD 04/10/97 43,544 6.12 716 4,38 LaGrande WD 10/01/93 323,871 7.21 5,971 43,05 Myers Marsh MWC 10/01/93 12,642 7.85 255 2,00

 Orland Artois WD 10/01/93 5,213,372 11.86 42,858 508,29 Tehama WD 1/ 10/01/93 0 Westside WD 10/01/93 4,388,657 9.98 47,349 472,54

Total 23,708,317 2,637,19

Footnotes:1/ Contract(s) expired in 1995.2/ Stockton East WD is considered a NonPermanent Contractor because the water under their long-term contract is not considered "firm supply".

3/ Contractors have a contract rate of $2.00 per acre-foot for project irrigation water. This is less than their CVP O&M charge, therefore; they are not making any payment on expired in 2005. The renewed contract rate is the "'Cost-of-Service" rate which includes the capital component. After contract renewal they may become eligible for relief from
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-10878

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00348-SDM-AEP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

HECTOR CAMIRLO ESPINOZA-GUIDO, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(October 31, 2017)

Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 17-10878 Date Filed: 10/31/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Hector Espinoza-Guido in this 

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Espinoza-Guido’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 17-10878 Date Filed: 10/31/2017 Page: 2 of 2
§ 418.38 Maximum allowable diversion. ( a ) The MAD established in this part is based on the premise that the Project should be operated to ensure that it is capable of delivering to the headgate of each water right holder the full water entitlement for irrigable eligible acres and includes distribution system losses. The MAD will be established (and is likely to vary) each year. The annual MAD will be calculated each year based on the actual acreage to be irrigated that year.
( b ) Historically, actual deliveries at farm headgates have been approximately 90 percent of entitlements. This practice is expected to continue but the percentage is expected to change. This variance between headgate deliveries and headgate entitlements will be calculated annually under this part and is allowed to be diverted if needed and thereby provides an assurance that full headgate deliveries can be made. The expected diversion and associated efficiency target for the examples shown in the Newlands Project Water Budget table would be: 285,243 AF and 65.1 percent in 1996 and beyond. These are well below the MAD limits; however, the District may divert up to the MAD if it is needed to meet valid headgate entitlements.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Driving the Hole in the Rock Road

Glen Canyon National Recreation Area