alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 49.105 Who can receive a permit? ( a ) Applicants who demonstrate that they meet the qualification requirements described in § 49.110, who provide a complete application as described in § 49.115, and whose proposed activity meets the issuance criteria described in § 49.120 may receive a permit.
( b ) Persons who do not meet the qualification requirements described in § 49.110, who do not provide a complete application as described in § 49.115, or whose proposed activity does not meet the issuance criteria described in § 49.120 will not receive a permit. However, they can perform work under an issued permit when appropriately supervised by a permittee.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to §906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First
Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 11, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    WILLIS H. NEWTON, JR.                        
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  Willis H. Newton, Jr.                        
|                     |  |  |  | Title:    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22122-CIV-WILLIAMS

JERMAINE L. COPELAND,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MARK S. INCH, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s report 

and recommendations (DE 5) (“Report”) regarding Plaintiff’s pro se civil rights complaint 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (DE 1). Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report. Upon 

an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, it is ORDERED 

AND ADJUDGED that the conclusions in the Report (DE 5) are AFFIRMED AND 

ADOPTED. 

The Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Florida, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1406(a). All 

pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in chambers in Miami, Florida, this 30th day of December, 

2020.

Case 1:20-cv-22122-KMW Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CC:

Jermaine Leon Copeland, 

DC #04598

Charlotte Correctional Institution 

Inmate Mail / Parcels 

33123 Oil Well Road

Punta Gorda, FL 33955

Case 1:20-cv-22122-KMW Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2020 Page 2 of 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129797 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

HARLEYSVILLE LAKE STATES Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, INSURANCE COMPANY, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 129797 

 COA: 255195 

Ingham CC: 02-001427-CK 

MASON INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., 

and PETER HANOVER,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0406 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 13, 2006 

Clerk
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) John Shaw LLC d/b/a Shaw Building Maintenance ) ASBCA No. 61379 ) Under Contract No. AAFES REZ-09-002-10-026 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. John Shaw, Jr. Owner APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. Army ChiefTrial Attorney CPTJohn M. McAdams III, JA

Trial Attorney OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL ON APPELLANT'S MOTION FORRECONSIDERATION Appellant requests reconsideration ofourrecent decision dismissing its claims for punitive damages and for $1,882,002.00 in "missed opportunities" from contracts that appellant allegedly did not obtain from third parties, allegedly because ofthe government's administration ofits contract with appellant. John Shaw LLCd/b/a Shaw BuildingMaintenance, ASBCA No. 61379, 2018 WL 1426992 (Mar. 8, 2018). We have not requested a response from the government. See RECORishadEngineering Construction ORG, ASBCA No. 60444, 17-1BCA136,767 at 179,167.
A motion for reconsideration is not intended to allow a party to re-argue issues that were previously raised and decided. Precision Standard, Inc., ASBCA No. 59116, 15-1BCA136,155 at 176,448. The moving party must show a compelling reason why the Board should modify its decision based upon newly discovered evidence, mistakes in our findings offact, orerrors oflaw. Id. Appellant enumerates a dozen reasons for its request, ranging from a pending motion to amend its complaint to "[e]qualjustice" (app. mot. at 1). Having considered those reasons, we see nothing thatpersuades us to reconsider ourdismissal ofits punitive and "missed opportunities" claims. The motion for reconsideration is denied. Dated: 3 April 2018

(Signatures continued) 

### -------~ --:7. ' /7 

### p I /~~" 

## rtMOTHY. MCILMXIL Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur

Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61379, Appeal ofJohn Shaw LLC d/b/a Shaw Building Maintenance, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:



### 2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/31 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
### §5364. Wine imported in bulk

Natural wine (as defined in section 5381) imported or brought into the United States in bulk containers may, under such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, be withdrawn from customs custody and transferred in such bulk containers to the premises of a bonded wine cellar without payment of the internal revenue tax imposed on such wine. The proprietor of a bonded wine cellar to which such wine is transferred shall become liable for the tax on the wine withdrawn from customs custody under this section upon release of the wine from customs custody, and the importer, or the person bringing such wine into the United States, shall thereupon be relieved of the liability for such tax.

(Added Pub. L. 105–34, title XIV, §1422(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1050; amended Pub. L. 105–206, title VI, §6014(b)(3), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 820.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5364, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1381, limited proprietors of bonded wine cellars or taxpaid wine bottling houses to the production, reception, storage, or use of only standard wine, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §§807(a)(46), 810, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 287, 292, eff. Jan. 1, 1980.

Another prior section 5364, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 665, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–206 substituted "Natural wine (as defined in section 5381) imported or brought into" for "Wine imported or brought into" in first sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–206 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the provisions of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. 105–34, to which such amendment relates, see section 6024 of Pub. L. 105–206, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–34, title XIV, §1422(c), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1050, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall take effect on the 1st day of the 1st calendar quarter that begins at least 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 5, 1997]."
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4785 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4785

 To extend by 19 days the authorization for the special assessment for 
                the Domestic Trafficking Victims' Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 6, 2022

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend by 19 days the authorization for the special assessment for 
                the Domestic Trafficking Victims' Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR 
              DOMESTIC TRAFFICKING VICTIMS' FUND.

    Section 3014(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended, in the 
matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``September 11'' and 
inserting ``September 30''.
                                 <all>
```
M&I 2003 Sch B-6 F.Z07.XLS

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF FY 2003 ALLOCATED M&I CONVEYANCE EXPENSE

2005 M&I WATER RATES

Total Ratio of A/F 

Facility/Contractor A/F 1/ by Contractor Black Butte D & R

County of ColusaElk Creek CSDWhitney Const.

Total BB D & R

Clear Creek Unit

Clear Creek CSD

Contra Costa Canal

Contra Costa WD

Cow Creek Unit

Bella Vista WD

Cross Valley Canal

County of FresnoCounty of Tulare

Total CV Canal

Delta-Mendota Canal

City of TracyDel Puerto WDDepartment of VAPanoche WD - DMCPlain View WDSan Luis WD - DMC

Total DM Canal

Folsom D & R

City of RosevilleEl Dorado ID - FD&RSan Juan Suburban WD

Total Folsom D & R

Folsom-South Canal

East Bay MUDSacramento MUD 2,876 1.000000 

2,876 1.000000 

7/21/2004
M&I 2003 Sch B-6 F.Z07.XLS 

7/21/2004 

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF FY 2003 ALLOCATED M&I CONVEYANCE EXPENSE

2005 M&I WATER RATES

Total Ratio of A/F 

Facility/Contractor A/F 1/ by Contractor Friant Dam

County of MaderaFresno County WW #18

Total Friant Dam

Friant-Kern Canal

Arvin-Edison WSD

City of FresnoCity of LindsayCity of Orange CoveLindsay-Strathmore IDShafter-Wasco IDTerra Bella ID

Total FK Canal

Sacramento River

City of Redding - SRCity of West SacramentoDiamond Lands Corp.Lake California P.O.A.Riverview Golf & CC

Total Sacramento River

San Felipe Unit

SB County WD - IBSC Valley WD - IB

Total SF Unit

San Luis Canal - Fresno

City of AvenalCity of CoalingaCity of HuronState of CAWestlands WD

Total SLC - Fresno

San Luis Canal - Tracy

Broadview WDPacheco WD - SLCPanoche WD - SLCSan Luis WD - SLC

Total SLC - Tracy
M&I 2003 Sch B-6 F.Z07.XLS

7/21/2004

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF FY 2003 ALLOCATED M&I CONVEYANCE EXPENSE

2005 M&I WATER RATES

Total Ratio of A/F 

Facility/Contractor A/F 1/ by Contractor Shasta Dam

Centerville CSDMountain Gate CSDShasta CWA 

Total Shasta Dam

Sly Park

El Dorado ID - SP

Spring Creek Conduit

City of Redding - SCCShasta County #25Shasta CSD

Total SC Conduit

Sugar Pine Reservoir

Foresthill PUD

Tehama-Colusa Canal

Colusa-County WD

Toyon Pipeline

City of Redding - TPCity of Shasta Lake 2/US Forest Service

Total Toyon Pipeline

GRAND TOTAL 2,876 1.0000 

FOOTNOTES

1/ All costs are to be directly billed other than for those to be directly paid by the Folsom-South Canal users.

2/ Per letter of agreement, dated 3/17/92, it has been determined that contractor does its own conveyance O&M.Source: 

(1) Deliveries - M&I 2003 Sch B-2 F.Z07.XLS(2) Conveyance Expenses to be allocated - M&I 2003 Sch B-7 F.Z07.XLS
Exhibit 4.407

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 181220 dated June 17, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Telematic services

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until June 17, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated March 02, 2020 No. 89-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal: 
    MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS 
   COMMUNICATIONS 
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION 
   IN THE SPHERE 
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION 
   TECHNOLOGY 
   AND MASS MEDIA 
   PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 118290
#### § 4.1102 Construction.

These rules shall be construed to achieve the just, timely, and inexpensive determination of all proceedings consistent with adequate consideration of the issues involved.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 21

- 0148

JOHN CLAYTON ELLINGHOUSE

,

Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA

,

Appellee

. ORDER D ISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant ’ s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED

.

IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

DATED this _____ day of June 20 21

.

Supreme Court Justice

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 17 2021

06/17/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0148
#### § 404.58 Do rural water projects authorized before the enactment of the Rural Water Supply Act of 2006 have to comply with the requirements in this rule?

No. Neither the Act nor this rule imposes any additional requirements on rural water supply projects that were authorized for construction before the date of enactment of the Act.
§ 4.800 Scope and construction of rules. ( a ) The rules of procedure in this subpart I supplement part 17 of this title and are applicable to the practice and procedure for hearings, decisions, and administrative review conducted by the Department of the Interior, pursuant to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (section 602, 42 U.S.C. 2000d-1) and part 17 of this title, concerning nondiscrimination in Federally-assisted programs in connection with which Federal financial assistance is extended under laws administered in whole or in part by the Department of the Interior.
( b ) These regulations shall be liberally construed to secure the just, prompt, and inexpensive determination of all proceedings consistent with adequate consideration of the issues involved and full protection of the rights of all interested parties including the Government.
§ 6305.11 What alternatives to granting access will BLM consider in cases of State and private inholdings? To reduce or eliminate the need to use wilderness areas for access to State and private land, BLM may— ( a ) Accept donation of the inholding, or
( b ) Acquire the inholding from the owner by an exchange for federally owned land in the same State of approximately equal value or, if the owner concurs, by purchase.
#### § 3811.2-4 Lands in national forests.

For mining claims in national forests, see § 3811.1.
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Integrated Surgical
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ramesh C. Trivedi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Ramesh C. Trivedi
------------------------------------------

Ramesh C. Trivedi, Chief Executive Officer

April 13, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                          212
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,022
<ALLOWANCES>                    161
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,075
<PP&E>                          1,547
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,199
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     3,924
<COMMON>                        10,427
<OTHER-SE>                      (13,062)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,488
<SALES>                         1,028
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,028
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                13
<LOSS-PROVISION>                19
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (734)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (734)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (734)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.23)

        


</TABLE>
#### § 4.452-4 Authority of administrative law judge.

The administrative law judge is vested with general authority to conduct the hearing in an orderly and judicial manner, including authority to subpoena witnesses and to take and cause depositions to be taken for the purpose of tasking testimony but not for discovery in accordance with the act of January 31, 1903 (43 U.S.C. 102-106), to administer oaths, to call and question witnesses, and to make a decision. The issuance of subpoenas, the attendance of witnesses and the taking of depositions shall be governed by §§ 4.423 and 4.26 of the general rules in subpart B of this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1000
<OTHER-SE>                      (1000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
                                

</TABLE>
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Winter Sports
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Travel Where Women Made History
#### Clara Barone, Appellant, v. John Barone, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.