alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 1086

Claimant awarded $27,515.79.)

#### The R. F. Conway Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

Opinion *filed June 6,*1927.

*Contract*— when *State liable. State bond issue.*Where claimant under a combination bid for certain sections of the State Bond Issue Route No. 4, is awarded the contract by the State, and afterwards it is compelled to perform the contracts separately, resulting in damages to it, it is entitled to recover the difference between the combination bid and the next lowest and best bid for the work completed under the separate contracts.

Snapp, Heise and Snapp, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; William E. Trautmann, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

The facts in this case are disclosed in the following stipulation duly executed by the claimant by its attorneys, Snapp, Heise and Snapp, and the defendants, the State of Illinois, by Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General, the said stipulation being in figures and words as follows, to-wit:

Stipulation.

“Whereas claimants made a combination bid upon sections 28, 29, and 430 of State Bond Issue Route No. 4 upon an agreement that all of said three sections were to be completed in one season and were awarded- contracts upon sections 28 *435and 29 immediately upon the combined bid and were to be awarded the contract for section 430, upon the combined bid, within ten days thereafter and as soon'-as all the right of way was secured, but owing to the delay caused by the local authorities of the village of Lyons, in the county of Cook, the contract for section 430 could not be and was not awarded until late in the fall, but was awarded on the combined bid. This delay prevented claimant from completing the work on section 430 in one season, to the damage of the • claimant claimed by it in the sum of $123,522.05, in accordance with' the proofs now taken by deposition herein.

And whereas, the claimant bases its right to recover upon the fact that it was compelled to perform said contracts separately and the lowest and best bid for the separate performance of said contract was in the sum of $664,085.79, and the combined bid of said claimant for the performance of said contracts together was in the amount of $636,570.00, the difference between said two amounts being the sum of $27,515.79.

“And whereas, the State of Illinois is unwilling to pay to the claimant the amount of damages claimed by it but is willing to concede to said claimant the difference between the combination bid of said claimant for the work on said three sections and the next lowest and best bids for said work which were upon separate contracts, it is, therefore, agreed and stipulated between the parties that an award for the benefit of said claimant be entered herein in the amount of $27,515.79.”

Therefore this court upon said stipulation and the facts set out therein, recommends that said claimant be allowed the sum of $27,515.79.
#### In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings. Lefstein & Rosenfeld Company, Appellant; Henry J. Hunt, Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs. The determination was within the discretion of the justice. He might well be reluctant to convict of contempt on *ex parte*papers, and he might well remit the creditor to the remedy of procuring the attendance of the debtor by attachment. (See *Matter of Nejez,*54 Misc. Rep. 38.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred; Burr, J., not voting.
§ 3922.40 Tract delineation. ( a ) The BLM will delineate tracts for competitive sale to provide for the orderly development of the oil shale resource.
( b ) The BLM may delineate more or less lands than were covered by an application for any reason the BLM determines to be in the public interest.
( c ) The BLM may delineate tracts in any area acceptable for further consideration for leasing, whether or not expressions of leasing interest or applications have been received for those areas.
( d ) Where the BLM receives more than 1 application covering the same lands, the BLM may delineate the lands that overlap as a separate tract.
United States Department of Agriculture

When you choose a career with USDA’s Plant Protection 

and Quarantine, you will protect U.S. farms, forests, and 

landscapes from damaging invasive pests. We’re looking for 

problem solvers and innovators who can help us safeguard 

agriculture and the environment. Join us today!

I want to 

protect our 

farms!

You’ve always wanted to do 

great things. Now is your chance! 

www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Plant Protection and Quarantine: Find Your Future With Us
n Paid work experience for students with 

possible conversion without competition to 

a permanent position when they finish their 

education, training, and work requirements

n Leadership programs for career development 

and advancement

n Paid continuing education programs

n Scholarships, mentoring, shadowing 

assignments, and summer employment

n Networking opportunities

n Recognition incentives, challenges, 

and rewards

n Special hiring programs for interns, recent 

graduates, advanced degree candidates, 

and veterans

n Opportunities to innovate and improve 

program and organizational processes

n A supportive and collegial work environment

n Domestic and international travel

n Competitive starting pay with regular increases

n Comprehensive and affordable medical 

benefits and paid medical leave

n Affordable life insurance

n Comprehensive retirement benefits 

and pension plan

n Family-friendly work and leave policies

n 10 paid Federal holidays and 

paid vacation leave

n Health, wellness, and 

fitness programs

n Student Loan 

Repayment 

Program

We Offer:

n Botanists, geneticists, entomologists, plant 

pathologists, and agriculturalists

n Plant health officers, technicians, and 

safeguarding specialists

n Computer scientists, industrial engineers, 

global trade analysts, quantitative ecologists, 

statisticians, and biometricians 

n Data analysts, economists, and trade directors

n Management, program, and budget analysts

n Administrative professionals of all types

We Hire:

Explore Current Opportunities: 

www.usajobs.gov (search “APHIS”)

Issued April 2020

Program Aid No. 2262-3

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
#### § 4.841 Official transcript.

An official reporter will be designated for all hearings. The official transcripts of testimony and argument taken, together with any exhibits, briefs, or memoranda of law filed therewith, shall be filed with the administrative law judge. Transcripts may be obtained by the parties and the public from the official reporter at rates not to exceed the applicable rates fixed by the contract with the reporter. Upon notice to all parties, the administrative law judge may authorize such corrections to the transcript as are necessary to accurately reflect the testimony.
#### Herbert Callman, Doing Business as Herbert Callman Company, Respondent, v. Samuel S. Marcus et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
### §262. Personal, living, and family expenses

#### (a) General rule

Except as otherwise expressly provided in this chapter, no deduction shall be allowed for personal, living, or family expenses.

#### (b) Treatment of certain phone expenses

For purposes of subsection (a), in the case of an individual, any charge (including taxes thereon) for basic local telephone service with respect to the 1st telephone line provided to any residence of the taxpayer shall be treated as a personal expense.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 76; Pub. L. 100–647, title V, §5073(a), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3682.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–647 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "Except as otherwise expressly provided in this chapter, no deduction shall be allowed for personal, living, or family expenses."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–647, title V, §5073(b), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3682, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1988."
### §978. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 87–629, §8, Sept. 5, 1962, 76 Stat. 430, which related to taxation of property distributed under this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### William J. Hewlett, Respondent, v. Del Balso & Sprague, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
### §1444. Withholding on Virgin Islands source income

For purposes of determining the withholding tax liability incurred in the Virgin Islands pursuant to this title (as made applicable to the Virgin Islands) with respect to amounts received from sources within the Virgin Islands by citizens and resident alien individuals of the United States, and corporations organized in the United States, the rate of withholding tax under sections 1441 and 1442 on income subject to tax under section 871(a)(1) or 881 shall not exceed the rate of tax on such income under section 871(a)(1) or 881, as the case may be.

(Added Pub. L. 97–455, §1(b), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2497; amended Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1012(x), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3530.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–647 struck out "(as modified by section 934A)" before "shall not exceed".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–647 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the provision of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99–514, to which such amendment relates, see section 1019(a) of Pub. L. 100–647, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to payments made after Jan. 12, 1983, see section 1(e)(2) of Pub. L. 97–455, set out as a note under section 934 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   infomration  extracted  from
     KOALA CAPITAL CORPORATION June 30, 1996 financial  statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894539
<NAME>                        KOALA CAPITAL CORPORATION

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996

<CASH>                                    50,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            50,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   1,100
<OTHER-SE>                                48,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              50,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### § 3509.15 Do I have to pay for a future interest lease?

You must pay fair market value for the mineral deposit when title vests in the United States. You also will be required to pay royalty on your production.
Mr. Eric PorterU.S. Fish and Wildlife Office

6010 Hidden Valley Road

Carlsbad, California 92011 -

Re: Request for Formal Consultation under Section 7 of Federal Endangered Species

Act for Proposed Pio Pico Energy Center

Dear Mr. Porter:

By this letter, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (“Region 9”)requests initiation of formal consultation under Section 7 of the federal Endangered Species Act

(“ESA”) for the proposed Pio Pico Energy.Center (“PPEC”), to be located in an unincorporated

area of San Diego County, California known as Otay Mesa. Pio Pico Energy Center, LLC has

applied to Region 9 for a Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) permit as required by

Part C ofthe Clean Air Act and regulations at 40 C.F.R. § 52.21. Region 9 is responsible for complying with ESA Section 7 requirements with respect to federal PSD permitting, and must

ensure that issuance ofthe PSD permit for the PPEC is not likely to jeopardize the continued

existence of any Federally-listed endangered or threatened species, or result in the destrncion oradverse modification of critical habitat of such species.

The applicant and Region 9 have participated in informal consultation with U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service (“FWS”) regarding PPEC. This request for formal consultation is made in

accordance with our discussion with you on October 26, 2011. FWS indicated that fbrmalconsultation would be required because nitrogen deposition fi-om the PPEC may affect three

federally listed species: the Otay Tarplant (Deinandra conjugens), the Quino (.‘heckerspot

Butterfly (Euphydiyas editha quino), and the Coastal California (Inatcatcher (Folioptila

cafl/àrnica cali/örnica).

The applicant, acting through its authorized representatives including URS Corp., compiled and

submitted a Biological Assessment (“BA”) to Region 9 on December 1, 2011. The BA provides

infbrmation about the project and its effects on listed species and their critical habitat, as well as

proposed conservation measures intended to minimize and compensate for project nitrogen

deposition effects on the Otay Tarplant, Quino Checkerspot Butterfly, and Coastal Califhrnia

Gnatcatcher and designated critical habitat for these species. We sent you a copy ofthe BA todayvia email; a hard copy is available upon request.

While the BA prepared by the applicant concludes that EPA’s proposed action is noT likeiy toadversely affect the Federally-listed species at issue or critical habitat, Region 9 cannot

determine that that conclusion is appropriate at this time based on the inFormation provided in

Printed on Recycled Paper
Sincerely,

4cGerardo C. Rios

Chief, Air Permits Office

cc: David Jenkins, Pio Pico Energy Center, LLC (via email)

Lincoln Hulse, URS (via email)

Steve Hill, Sierra Research (via email)

Ann Crisp, California Energy Commission (via email)
### §842. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–281, §1(b)(3), May 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 246

Section, act Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 909, §2, 70 Stat. 963, related to transfers of individual property to members of tribe.
#### Rose Zucker et al., as Administratrices of the Estate of Sylvia Zucker, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Co., Respondent.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
§ 669.380 What is the objective assessment that is authorized as an intensive service? ( a ) An objective assessment is a procedure designed to comprehensively assess the skills, abilities, and interests of each employment and training participant through the use of diagnostic testing and other assessment tools. The methods used by the grantee in conducting the objective assessment may include: ( 1 ) Structured in-depth interviews;
( 2 ) Skills and aptitude assessments;
( 3 ) Performance assessments (for example, skills or work samples, including those that measure interest and capability to train in nontraditional employment);
( 4 ) Interest or attitude inventories;
( 5 ) Career guidance instruments;
( 6 ) Aptitude tests; and
( 7 ) Basic skills tests.
( b ) The objective assessment is an ongoing process that requires the grantee staff to remain in close consultation with each participant to continuously obtain current information about the participant's progress that may be relevant to his/her Individual Employment Plan (IEP).
September 13, 2002


Gene Abbadessa
Star E-Media Corporation
7700 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 510
Irvine, CA 92618

Re:  Distribution  Agreement  between  Scholastic  Inc.  ("Scholastic") and Star
     E-Media  Corporation ("Star E-Media") dated as of March 1, 2000 (the "March
     1, 2000 Agreement"); and Distribution Agreement between Scholastic and Star
     E-Media  dated  as  of  December 1, 1999, as amended (the "December 1, 1999
     Agreement")  (collectively,  the  "Agreements")


Dear Mr. Abbadessa:

This  letter  is  to  confirm that at this time and until February 28, 2004 with
respect  to the March 1, 2000 Agreement, Star E-Media has the exclusive right to
advertise,  market,  distribute and sell Scholastic's software product Math Shop
Deluxe  in  the  Arabic language for distribution in Saudi Arabia subject to the
terms  and  conditions  of  the  March  1,  2000  Agreement.

Furthermore,  at  this  time  and  until  December  1,  2002 with respect to the
December  1,  1999 Agreement, Star E-Media has the exclusive right to advertise,
market,  distribute  and sell the following of Scholastic's software products in
the  Arabic  language  as a bilingual Arabic-English product for distribution in
Saudi Arabia: I'm Ready for Kindergarten: Huggly's Rescue; I Spy Spooky Mansion;
I Spy Junior; Scholastic SuperPrint Deluxe; Chato's Kitchen; Why Mosquitoes Buzz
in  People's  Ears;  Usborne's  Animated  First  Thousand  Words;  I'm Ready for
Kindergarten: Huggly's Sleepover; and I Spy, subject to the terms and conditions
of  the  December  1,  1999  Agreement.


Sincerely,



/s/ Alan Waldman
Alan Waldman
Vice President & General Manager,
Scholastic Software Group
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVibration and thermal vacuum qualification test results for a low-voltage tungsten-halogen lightThe results of a space flight qualification test program for a low-voltage, quartz tungsten-halogen light are presented. The test program was designed to qualify a halogen light for use in the Pool Boiling Experiment, a Get Away Special (GAS) payload that will be flown in the space shuttle payload bay. Vibration and thermal vacuum tests were performed. The test results indicated that the halogen light will survive the launch and ascent loads, and that the convection-free environment associated with the GAS payload system will not detrimentally affect the operation of the halogen light.Document ID19910010012Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSexton, J. Andrew*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Brook Park, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1991Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187050E-5890NASA-CR-187050Accession Number91N19325Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-25266PROJECT: RTOP 694-03-06Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910010012.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
H. R. 4511 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To amend the Veterans’ Oral History Project Act to allow the collection of video 

and audio recordings of biographical histories by immediate family members 

of members of the Armed Forces who died as a result of their service during 

a period of war. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Families Voices Act’’. 

SEC. 2. COLLECTION OF VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDINGS OF 

BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORIES BY IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO DIED AS 

A RESULT OF THEIR SERVICE DURING A PERIOD OF WAR. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 3(a) of the Veterans’ 

Oral History Project Act (20 U.S.C. 2142(a)(1)) is amended to read 

as follows: 

‘‘(1) to collect video and audio recordings of— 

‘‘(A) personal histories and testimonials of veterans 

of the Armed Forces who served during a period of war; 

and 

‘‘(B) biographical histories by immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces who became missing 

in action or died as a result of their service during a 

period of war;’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3 of the Veterans’ Oral 

History Project Act (20 U.S.C. 2142) is further amended by adding 

at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) DEFINITION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER.—For purposes 

of subsection (a), the term ‘immediate family member’ means a 

parent, spouse, sibling, or child.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40605 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CLEMENTE SANCHEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-01-CR-55-1

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Clemente Sanchez-Rodriguez (Sanchez) on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sanchez has filed a letter in response to counsel’s motion in which he moves to proceed pro se on appeal. Sanchez’s motion to proceed pro se is DENIED. United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous appellate issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motionNo. 01-40605 -2- for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.