alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (530)
<INVENTORY>                                     74,587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,299
<PP&E>                                          47,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,421)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,778
<BONDS>                                         68,339
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,513
<SALES>                                        143,762
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,377
<CGS>                                          116,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  116,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,815
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,392
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,423
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,423
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32








WRITTEN
STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


FURNISHED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


AND
FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH RULE 13a-14(b)


OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.





In
connection with the Annual Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund IV
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2008 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b) information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





/s/Kimberly A.
      Springsteen-AbbottKimberly
      A. Springsteen-AbbottChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerMarch
      31, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 59145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22228]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 0, 1, and 54

[CC Docket No. 02-6; FCC 04-190]


Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the dates and final rules 
sections of a Federal Register document regarding the Commission 
adopting measures to protect against waste, fraud, and abuse in the 
administration of the schools and libraries universal service support 
mechanism. In addition, the Commission resolved a number of issues that 
have arisen from audit activities conducted as part of ongoing 
oversight over the administration of the universal service fund, and 
the Commission addressed programmatic concerns raised by our Office of 
Inspector General. The summary was published in the Federal Register on 
September 13, 2004.

DATES: Effective October 4, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Schneider, Attorney, 
Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 
(202) 418-7400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This summary contains a correction to the 
dates and final rules sections of a Federal Register summary, 69 FR 
55097 (September 13, 2004). The full text of the Commission's Fifth 
Report and Order and Order in CC Docket No. 02-6, FCC 04-190 released 
on August 13, 2004 is available for public inspection during regular 
business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

0
In rule FR Doc. 04-20363 published September 13, 2004 (69 FR 55097) 
make the following corrections.
0
1. On page 55097, in the second column, in the dates section, remove 
``54.504(f)'' and add in its place ``54.504(h).''

PART 54--[CORRECTED]

0
2. On page 55109, in the third column, in paragraph 8, third line, 
remove ``(f)'' and add in its place ``(h).''


Sec.  54.504  [Corrected]

0
3. On page 55110, in the third column, in the twentieth line, remove 
``(f)'' and add in its place ``(h).''

0
4. On page 55110, in the third column, in paragraph 9, remove ``E'' and 
add in its place ``F.''

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-22228 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### § 4.845 Final review by Secretary.

Paragraph (f) of § 17.9 of this title requires that any final decision of an administrative law judge or of the Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, which provides for the suspension or termination of, or the refusal to grant or continue Federal financial assistance, or the imposition of any other sanction available under part 17 of this title or the Act, shall be transmitted to the Secretary. The applicant or recipient shall have 20 days following service upon him of such notice to submit to the Secretary exceptions to the decision and supporting briefs or memoranda suggesting remission or mitigation of the sanctions proposed. The Director shall have 10 days after the filing of the exceptions and briefs in which to reply.
#### Antoinette M. Condon, as Limited Ancillary Administratrix of the Estate of James D. Condon, Deceased, v. Sigmund Janas.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### §42. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 632

Section, R.S. §2068, provided for interpreters for Indian agencies under Department of the Interior.
#### Chester *v.*Lanford.

November 19, 1910.

Habeas corpus. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. May 13, 1910.

*John W. Qox*and *Burton Cloud,*for plaintiff.

*James L. Mayson*and *TV. D. Ellis Jr.,*for defendant.

Fish, C. J.

1. The ordinance of the City of Atlanta embodied in the city code, § 1537, is not exhaustive on the subject of penalties which i may be imposed for a violation of the same, but is to be considered in connection with the ordinance embraced in § 1779. Therefore, on the trial of an application for habeas corpus, .involving the question of the legality of a sentence imposed for a violation of § 1537, it was not error to allow the answer of the respondent to be amended by setting up the provisions of § 1779 for the purpose of having the same considered in connection with those of § 1537 as showing authority for the imposition of such sentence.

2. The charter of the City of Atlanta and the provisions of the ordinances embodied in sections 1537 and 1779 of its city code, passed under such charter, give authority to the recorder, upon conviction of a person charged with keeping within the city spirituous, fermented, or malt . liquoi-s for illegal sale, to sentence him to pay a fine of live hundred dollars and costs, and, in default of such payment, to work on the streets or public works of said city thirty days, under the direction of the superintendent of public works. *Lyons*v. *Collier,*125 *Ga.*231 (54 S. E. 183); *Loeb*v. *Jennings,*133 *Ga.*796 (1) (67 S. E. 101).

3. Accordingly, the judge of the superior court did not, under the facts of this case, err in refusing to discharge the plaintiff in error from custody, under the writ of habeas corpus. ‘

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 3734.1 Owner of claim to file notice of location and assessment work. ( a ) The owner of any unpatented mining claim, mill site, or tunnel site located on land described in § 3730.0-1 (a) and (b), shall file all notices or certificates of location, amended notices or certificates, and transfers of interest, with the proper State Office of the Bureau of Land Management pursuant to part 3833 of this chapter, and pay the applicable maintenance, location, and service fees required by part 3830 of this title. The notice, certificate, transfer, or amendment thereto shall be marked by the owner to indicate that it is being filed pursuant to the Act of August 11, 1955, the Act of April 8, 1948, or both, as required by part 3833. Failure to so mark the location certificate will delay the procedures to authorize mining under subpart 3736.
( b ) Neither section 4 nor any other provision of the Act validates any mining location made prior to the act, which is invalid because made on lands after they were withdrawn or reserved for power purposes and before a favorable determination by the Federal Power Commission under section 24 of the Federal Power Act of June 10, 1920 (41 Stat. 1063; 1075), as amended (16 U.S.C. 792; 818) and the opening or restoration of the lands to location. Section 4 applies to unpatented locations for lands referred to in § 3730.0-3(a) only if: ( 1 ) The location was made on or after August 11, 1955, or
( 2 ) The location was made prior to August 11, 1955, and prior to the withdrawal or reservation of the lands for power purposes, or
( 3 ) The location was made prior to August 11, 1955, on lands restored to location from a powersite reserve or withdrawal subject to section 24 of the Federal Power Act.
( c ) The owner of any unpatented mining claim, mill site, or tunnel site located on land described in § 3730.0-1 of this chapter may either: ( 1 ) Perform and record annual assessment work if the owner qualifies as a small miner under part 3835 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) Pay an annual maintenance fee of $100 per unpatented mining claim, mill site, or tunnel site in lieu of the annual assessment work or notice of intention to hold, under subpart 3834 of this chapter.
[35 FR 9737, June 13, 1970, as amended at 58 FR 38196, July 15, 1993; 59 FR 44856, Aug. 30, 1994; 68 FR 61064, Oct. 24, 2003]
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
March 26, 2020
No. 04

- 19

- 00771

- CV KENT B. HOFFMAN, ET AL. ,

Appellant s

v. ANDREW M. THOMSON, ET AL. ,

Appellee s From the 343rd Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas Trial Court No. M

- 17

- 0008

- CV

- C, Consolidated M

- 17

- 0034

- CV

- B

Honorable Janna K. Whatley, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R
The Appe llees ’ Motion for Extension of T ime to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. T h e appellees ’ brief is du e on or before May 4, 2020.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of March, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
AFS-15-1171-E

May 27, 2015

 Exemption No. 10521B 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0824

Mr. Brian Neuhoff

Airbus Helicopters, Inc.

2701 North Forum Drive

Grand Prairie, TX 75052

Dear Mr. Neuhoff:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 10521, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists 

the conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 10, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Airbus Helicopters, Inc. (Airbus Helicopters) (formerly American Eurocopter Flight 

Simulation Center) for an extension of Exemption No.10521, as amended. That exemption 

from part 60, Appendix C, Table C2A, paragraph 4.b.3 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) permits a geometric error of up to 12 degrees between the image 

generator (IG) eye point and the pilot eye point for the Eurocopter (EC) 175 Level D full 

flight simulator (FFS).

In your petition you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Airbus Helicopters.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10521, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, delegated 

to me by the Administrator, Airbus Helicopters, Inc. is granted an extension to Exemption

10521, as amended, from 14 CFR part 60, Continuous field-of-view tests stated in Table C2A, 

paragraph 4.b.3 to the extent necessary to allow Airbus Helicopters to manufacture and obtain 

FAA qualification of its Level D Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD), subject to the 

following conditions and limitations:

Conditions and Limitations

1. A geometric error of no greater than 12° is allowed subject to evaluation by a National

Simulator Program (NSP) Aviation Safety Inspector (ASI) by conducting ground and 

flight maneuvers to validate the geometric/parallax error does not negatively affect 

qualified training, testing, or checking tasks.

2. If the objective/subjective testing is successful, the NSP ASI will make a 

recommendation to the National Simulator Program Manager (NSPM) for final 

approval.

3. Any training maneuver found to not be subjectively acceptable due to 

geometric/parallax error will be task restricted on the FSTD’s Statement of 

Qualification as determined appropriate by the NSPM.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10521, as amended, to May 31,

2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCurrent activities in standardization of high-temperature, low-cycle-fatigue testing techniques in the United StatesThe American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard E606-80 is the most often used recommended testing practice for low-cycle-fatigue (LCF) testing in the United States. The standard was first adopted in 1977 for LCF testing at room temperature and was modified in 1980 to include high-temperature testing practices. Current activity within ASTM is aimed at extending the E606-80 recommended practices to LCF under thermomechanical conditions, LCF in high-pressure hydrogen, and LCF in metal-matrix composite materials. Interlaboratory testing programs conducted to generate a technical base for modifying E606-80 for the aforementioned LCF test types are discussed.Document ID19910008114Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsVerrilli, Michael J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Ellis, J. Rodney*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Swindeman, Robert W.*(Oak Ridge National Lab. TN., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103675E-5891NAS 1.15:103675Meeting InformationMeeting: Harmonisation of Testing Practice for High Temperature MaterialsLocation: IspraCountry: ItalyStart Date: October 18, 1990End Date: October 19, 1990Accession Number91N17427Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910008114.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22658]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Cancer Institute. The 
meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance 
with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as 
amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual 
intramural programs and projects conducted by the National Cancer 
Institute, including consideration of personnel qualifications and 
performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Cancer Institute, Subcommittee 1--Clinical Sciences and 
Epidemiology.
    Date: November 15, 2004.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 3:45 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 
Building 31, Conference Room 10, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 9 p.m
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, Versailles IV, 8120 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Abby B. Sandler, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Institute Review Office, Office of the Director, 
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 2114, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 496-7628.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance into the building by non-government 
employees. Persons without a government I.D. will need to show a 
photo I.D. and sign-in at the security desk upon entering the 
building.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 4, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22658 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
From: Tommy Wilkerson

To: Brent Ruminski

Subject: RE: Carrizo Presentation CBI Clarification for EPA

Date: Monday, May 04, 2015 12:25:16 PM

Brent,

There is nothing in this presentation that is confidential, please feel free to use any or all of it.

Thanks,

Tommy Wilkerson

Water and Drill Solids Manager US

Carrizo Oil& Gas

500 Dallas Street

Suite 2300

Houston, TX 77002

Office-713-358-6233

Cell- 337-501-2090

Tommy.wilkerson@crzo.net

From: Brent Ruminski [mailto:Brent.Ruminski@erg.com] 

Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 11:12 AM

To: Tommy Wilkerson

Subject: RE: Carrizo Presentation CBI Clarification for EPA

From: Brent Ruminski 

Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 4:50 PM

To: 'Tommy.Wilkerson@crzo.net'

Subject: Carrizo Presentation CBI Clarification for EPA

Hi Tommy,

My name is Brent Ruminski and I work for Eastern Research Group, Inc., a contractor for the United

States Environmental Protection Agency. We are supporting EPA with a proposed effluent guideline

(ELG) rulemaking for the unconventional oil and gas extraction industry

(http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/oilandgas/unconv.cfm).

In 2013, we participated in the Produced Water Reuse Initiative in Denver, CO at which you

presented. We retrieved your presentation titled: Strategies for Sustainable Water Transport

Lessons Learned in the Marcellus Applied to the Niobrara. In the technical development document

that supports the proposed rulemaking, we have cited this presentation as it contains useful

information. However, we recently noticed that the word “confidential” appears in the footer on

some slides. Can you please confirm that this report is not considered confidential business

information (CBI)? If this report is not considered CBI, then it will be included in the public record at
www.regulations.gov under the document control number (DCN): SGE00638.A12.

Thank you,

Brent Ruminski

Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG)

14555 Avion Parkway Suite 200

Chantilly, VA 20151

703-633-1701 (office)
CVPCP FY19 Projects

Project Proposed Activity Funding

San Joaquin River National 

Wildlife Refuge Land 

Protection Project

USFWS Regional Realty 

Office

Funds are provided to FWS to conduct 

land appraisals in the vicinity of the San 

Joaquin River NWR in order to have 

values in hand to present to willing 

sellers of potential lands for inclusion in 

the Refuge. 

$42,400

Day Ranch Conservation 

Project

Sierra Foothills 

Conservancy

Conservation easement on the 356-

acre Dry Creek Ranch. The ranch 

contains grassland, vernal pool, and 

riparian/ aquatic habitat mosaics, and is 

within the southern Sierra Foothills 

vernal pool ecoregion.

$740,480

Epidemiological Attributes of 

Sarcoptic Mange in a 

Population of San Joaquin 

Kit Foxes: Development 

and Implementation of 

Strategies to Mitigate an 

Epidemic

CSU Stanislaus ESRP

The objectives are to use field efforts and 

monitoring, laboratory analyses, and 

modeling to: (1) develop and test strategies 

to control or eliminate mange among SJKF; 

(2) determine whether mange is occurring 

in SJKF outside of the Bakersfield 

population; (3) determine the origin of the 

mite that is causing mange in SJKF; (4) 

assess the impacts (both current and 

potential) of mange on this and other SJKF 

populations; and (5) implement strategies 

to minimize or eliminate mange in SJKF 

populations.

$187,106

2016 Allocation $1,492,000

Project Costs Total $969,986

Funds to Prior Year 

Projects 

$169,711*

Program Administration & 

Overhead Costs Total

$352,303