alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Travel Where Women Made History





Contact Us
  Science and Technology
 Women have also pioneered fields such as aviation and astronomy. Women likeMaria Mitchell  (the first woman astronomer) andVera Rubin the first person to discover dark matter) revolutionized the way society understands the universe. Other figures, like Sergeant Amelia Jones andAmelia Earhart, broke barriers by becoming the first in their fields. The places where these women lived, worked, and researched are important in the larger story of American history.
 Woman standing by the computer. Places of Hidden Figures Explore the places associated with NASA's African American women human computers.
 Cartoon of women aviators. Places of Women in Aviation Discover some of the places associated with women in aviation.
  Discover More Stories and Places of Science and Technology Sort By:RelevanceRecently UpdatedDate ReleasedTitle
 Show1040 per page
   women and minorities in aviation women aircraft workers women and science women in science women in stem
 Last updated: March 11, 2021
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
#### § 3809.500 In general, what are BLM's financial guarantee requirements?

To see generally what BLM's financial guarantee requirements are, follow this table:

| If— | Then— |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Your operations constitute casual use, | You do not have to provide any financial guarantee. |
| (b) You conduct operations under a notice or a plan of operations | You must provide BLM or the State a financial guarantee that meets the requirements of this subpart before starting operations operations. For more information, see §§ 3809.551 through under a 3809.573. |
§ 3602.43 How does BLM conduct competitive mineral materials sales? ( a ) The applicant requesting a mineral materials sale must pay a processing fee on a case-by-case basis as described in § 3000.11 of this chapter as modified by the provisions in this section and in § 3602.42(b)(8). The cost recovery process for a competitive mineral materials sale follows: ( 1 ) The applicant requesting the sale must pay the cost recovery fee amount before BLM will publish a sale notice.
( 2 ) Before the contract is issued: ( i ) The successful bidder, if someone other than the applicant, must pay to BLM the cost recovery amount specified in the sale notice; and
( ii ) The successful bidder must pay all processing costs BLM incurs after the date of the sale notice.
( 3 ) If the successful bidder is someone other than the applicant, BLM will refund to the applicant the amount paid under paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) In conducting a competitive sale, BLM may require submission of sealed written bids, oral bids, or a combination of both. The sale notice will state how you must submit your bid. If 2 or more persons make identical high sealed bids, BLM will determine the highest bid by holding an oral auction among the persons making the identical high bids. If no oral bid is made higher than the sealed bids, BLM will pick the successful bidder by lot. After BLM announces the high bid at an oral auction, if you are the high bidder you must confirm that bid in writing at least by the close of business on the date of the sale, or by such time as BLM may specify in the sale notice.
( c ) When BLM determines that it is in the public interest to do so, we may reject any or all bids, or may waive minor deficiencies in the bids that would not ordinarily affect the outcome of the bidding.
[66 FR 58901, Nov. 23, 2001, as amended at 70 FR 58878, Oct. 7, 2005]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSSME LOX post flow analysis/fluid structure interaction. Volume 1: Flow analysisThe realization of measures to improve the performance of the Space Shuttle is, to a large extent, dependent on an improved understanding of the fluid flow phenomena occurring in the main engine. The overall arrangement of the primary components of the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) are presented. The impingement of the hot gases from the transfer ducts onto the LOX posts causes them to be subjected to severe thermal and gas dynamic loads, which in the past have resulted in the occasional breakage of some elements of the outer row of posts during test firings of the engine, particularly at higher power levels. Large velocities in the gap between the LOX posts may also be a contributing factor in causing dynamic stability problems. The deforming structural response of the posts to the pressure loading may likely affect the gas flowfield by producing a moving flowfield boundary, thereby creating a dynamically coupled unsteady fluid-structure system. The objective was to investigate the three-dimensional, turbulent flow around a simplified SSME LOX post array using an existing Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes flow solver and a suitable turbulence model to parameterize the turbulent shear stresses. Numerical computations were performed to analyze the effect on the flowfield of varying the spacing between the LOX posts, which were modeled as rigid, three-dimensional circular cylinders. The methodology used in the computations is described. Results are presented.Document ID19900004399Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBurke, Roger W.*(Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1989Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-183677LMSC-HEC-TR-F268618-VOL-1NAS 1.26:183677Accession Number90N13715Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-37361Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004399.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1000
<OTHER-SE>                      (1000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
                                

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 661

 672

 752

 750

 771

 751

 746

 725

 694

 658

 683

 719

 699

 663

 687

 690

 786

 762

 763

 733

 651

 707

 721

 713

 751

 741

 760

 765

 755

 767

 610

 609

 627

 640

 666

 681

 652

 642

 594

 608

 640

 605

 594

 617

 617

 636

 670

 690

 712

 616

 608

 603

 653

 662

 674

 689

 717

 713

 708

 706

 632

 640

 690

 703

 726

 726

 705

 689

 656

 634

 667

 666

 646

 646

 647

 666

 741

 727

 731

 675

 637

 657

 700

 696

 717

 717

 736

 743

 731

 740

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 13, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 632

 1,272

 1,962

 2,665

 3,391

 4,117

 4,822

 5,511

 6,167

 6,801

 7,468

 8,134

 8,780

 9,426

 10,073

 10,739

 11,480

 12,207

 12,938

 13,613

 14,250

 14,907

 15,607

 16,303

 17,020

 17,737

 18,473

 19,216

 19,947

 20,687

 632

 636

 654

 666

 678

 686

 689

 689

 685

 680

 679

 678

 675

 673

 672

 671

 675

 678

 681

 681

 679

 678

 679

 679

 681

 682

 684

 686

 688

 690

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
SERVED JANUARY 31, 2011 

•:;^ARTMENTOF 

^>«rRPORTATiON 

• v;! 0PER/M10N3 

ra j:}i 3! P 2: 38 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FLIGHTSTAR AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CPlOGLOOl 1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-1075 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On October 26, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter referred to 

as "Complainant") filed a Complaint. On October 6, 2010, Flightstar Aircraft Services, 

Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Respondent") filed its Answer. On January 26, 2011, 

Respondent withdrew its request for a hearing, citing settlement. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of its Request for Hearing be and is hereby 

granted; and 
2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

(LCX^ 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

I* 

i 

* 
FAA Docket Nos. CPlOGLOOl 1, 

CPlOGLOOl2, CPlOGLOOl3 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000^ 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Glenn L. Brown, Complainant '5 Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

DesPlaines,IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7063 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
**Signage Subcommittee Meeting #1 (Conference Call) 2014 February 6**

Agenda: The call seeks to strengthen the knowledge of call participants on what the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG) requires, if ADAAG was applied to signs on rail vehicles. Also, the call will review the variable messaging signage requirements in the International Code Council/American Standards Institute (ICC/ANSI) standard A117.1

- 2009, and review the (limited) signage require ments in the current rail guidelines. The call is not for discussing the problems in applying ADAAG or ICC/ANSI, but to prepare participants for the February 13 call where the use of ADAAG and ICC/ANSI will be discussed. This link ( **http://www.access -**  **board.gov/guidelines -**  **and -**  **standards/buildings -**  **and -**  **sites/about**   ** the** **- ada**  **- standards/background/ada**  **- aba**  **- a**  **ccessibility -** **guidelines -**  **2004** ) connects to ADAAG. Please review section 216 (in ADA chapter 2 scoping) which references various sections in 703. An ADAAG signage webinar conducted by the Access Board is also available and should be reviewed before the cal l, see **http://www.accessibilityonline.org/Archives/**, “Accessible Signage (July 1, 2010)”. This webinar is a must see if you are not familiar with ADAAG, since the primary purpose of the conferen ce call regarding ADAAG is to answer questions.

**Material**

 ICC A117.1 - 2009 Section 703 Signs REPRINTED with ICC stamp  Current Signage Provisions from the ADA Rail Guidelines (36 CFR 1192)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin GARCIA-GALLEGOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40381.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*268Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Martin Garcia-Gallegos pleaded guilty to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He appeals his 57-month sentence, arguing that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 132603) are unconstitutional.

Garcia-Gallegos’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Garcia-Gallegos contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Garcia-Gallegos properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,322.50

 2,322.48

 2,322.48

 2,322.44

 2,322.40

 2,322.38

 2,322.38

 2,322.37

 2,322.36

 2,322.35

 2,322.35

 2,322.32

 2,322.26

 2,322.18

 2,321.97

 2,321.72

 2,321.49

 2,321.24

 2,320.99

 2,320.84

 2,320.78

 2,320.71

 2,320.57

 2,320.44

 2,320.32

 2,320.15

 2,319.96

 2,319.85

 2,319.81

 2,319.78

 2,319.76

 1,744.4

 1,744.1

 1,744.1

 1,743.6

 1,743.1

 1,742.8

 1,742.8

 1,742.7

 1,742.5

 1,742.4

 1,742.4

 1,742.0

 1,741.2

 1,740.2

 1,737.4

 1,734.1

 1,731.0

 1,727.7

 1,724.4

 1,722.5

 1,721.7

 1,720.7

 1,718.9

 1,717.2

 1,715.6

 1,713.4

 1,710.9

 1,709.5

 1,708.9

 1,708.5

 1,708.3

STORAGE

+0.0

-0.3

+0.0

-0.5

-0.5

-0.3

+0.0

-0.1

-0.1

-0.1

+0.0

-0.4

-0.8

-1.1

-2.8

-3.3

-3.0

-3.3

-3.3

-2.0

-0.8

-0.9

-1.8

-1.7

-1.6

-2.2

-2.5

-1.4

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

CHANGE

51

205

335

389

145

68

450

488

298

154

468

756

873

1,101

575

481

546

103

390

192

175

620

571

392

314

527

316

73

223

192

252

INFLOW

 0

 331

 327

 656

 413

 198

 450

 551

 365

 209

 460

 953

 1,270

 1,628

 1,975

 2,141

 2,066

 1,751

 2,042

 1,178

 573

 1,076

 1,499

 1,242

 1,106

 1,649

 1,559

 786

 487

 390

 384

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 51

 8

 8

 0

 0

 4

 0

 4

 0

 12

 8

 4

 4

 8

 4

 4

 12

 16

 12

 8

 0

 8

 0

 12

 4

 4

 15

 12

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .13

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .03

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .40

 .05

 .96

 .30

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .25

 .03

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 19, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -36.0 11,723 29,715 0 0 222 .56 2.20

ACRE-FEET -36,000 23,253 58,940 0 0 440

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 58,940

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 58,940

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.20

JULY 1, 2000 6.08

 1,744.4

Table 4

(1) (1)
#### § 5.1 What does this subpart cover?

This subpart covers commercial filming and still photography activities on lands and waters administered by the National Park Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
§ 4300.41 What will the permit say about the number of reindeer and where I can graze them? ( a ) The permit will indicate the maximum number of reindeer you can graze on the permit area based on range conditions. BLM can adjust this number if range conditions change, as for example, by natural causes, overgrazing, or fire.
( b ) The permit will restrict grazing to a definitely described area which BLM feels is usable and adequate for your needs.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22654]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 109d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel, Mouse-BIRN Biomedical Technology.
    Date: November 8, 2004.
    Time: 10 a.m. to adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, 
MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Linda C. Duffy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research 
Resources, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 
1082, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-0810, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7115041717081d311c10181d5f1f18195f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="67031201011e0b270a060e0b49090e0f49000811">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel, Conference Grants.
    Date: December 7, 2004.
    Time: 10 p.m. to adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Office of Review, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy 
Blvd., Room 1070, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Harold L. Watson, BS, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, NCRR, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, 1 Democracy Plaza, Room 1070, MSC 
4874, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874, (301) 435-0813, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85f2e4f1f6eaebedc5e8e4ece9abebecedabe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bfc8decbccd0d1d7ffd2ded6d391d1d6d791d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 4, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22654 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-cv-22085-DPG

WINDY LUCIUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

AVB ENTERPRISE LLC

d/b/a BONEFLY,

Defendant.

/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff Windy Lucius (“Plaintiff”) respectfully submits this Notice of Settlement, and 

informs the Court as follows:

1. Plaintiff has reached an agreement with Defendant AVB Enterprise LLC d/b/a

Bonefly (“Defendant”) to resolve the claims against it.

2. The parties are in the process of finalizing a confidential settlement agreement and 

will be filing a Notice of Dismissal with the Court within sixty (60) days.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ J. Courtney Cunningham

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

FBN: 628166

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, FL 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com

Case 1:20-cv-22085-DPG Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 11, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system.

/s/ J. Courtney Cunningham

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

Case 1:20-cv-22085-DPG Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2020 Page 2 of 2