alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5102. Definition of manufacturer of stills

Any person who manufactures any still or condenser to be used in distilling shall be deemed a manufacturer of stills.

(Added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §451(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 819.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5102, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1339, defined manufacturer of stills, prior to the general revision of this subpart by Pub. L. 98–369.

Another prior section 5102, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 617, defined manufacturer of stills, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

A prior section 5103, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1339, related to exemptions from the taxes imposed by section 5101 of this title, prior to the general revision of this subpart by Pub. L. 98–369.

Another prior section 5103, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 617, related to exemptions from taxes imposed by section 5101 of this title, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

A prior section 5104, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1339, provided that the tax imposed on stills or condensers by section 5101 be paid by stamp, denoting the tax, under regulations prescribed by Secretary or his delegate, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1905(b)(3)(A)(i), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1822, effective on first day of first month which began more than 90 days after Oct. 4, 1976.

Another prior section 5104, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 617, required taxes to be paid by stamps, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

A prior section 5105, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1339; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1905(b)(6)(A), 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1823, 1834, related to notice of manufacturer of and permit to set up still, prior to the general revision of this subpart by Pub. L. 98–369. See section 5101 of this title.

Another prior section 5105, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 617, related to notice of manufacture of and permit to set up still, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

A prior section 5106, added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1340; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834, related to export without payment of tax and export with the privilege of drawback, prior to the general revision of this subpart by Pub. L. 98–369.

Another prior section 5106, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 618, related to payment of tax and drawback on exports, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of first calendar month which begins more than 90 days after July 18, 1984, see section 456(a) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 5101 of this title.
### §3102. Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are to—

(1) allow the Secretary of the Interior to take part in the management of Indian forest lands, with the participation of the lands' beneficial owners, in a manner consistent with the Secretary's trust responsibility and with the objectives of the beneficial owners;

(2) clarify the authority of the Secretary to make deductions from the proceeds of sale of Indian forest products, assure the use of such deductions on the reservation from which they are derived solely for use in forest land management activities, and assure that no other deductions shall be collected;

(3) increase the number of professional Indian foresters and related staff in forestry programs on Indian forest land; and

(4) provide for the authorization of necessary appropriations to carry out this chapter for the protection, conservation, utilization, management, and enhancement of Indian forest lands.

(Pub. L. 101–630, title III, §303, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4532.)
## THE MEYERSON LAW FIRM, P.C.
A TTORNEYS 

### A T 

### L AW 2224 Walsh Tarlton Ln., Suite 120 Austin, Texas 78746 Phone: (512) 330- 9001 │ Fax: (512) 330 -9005

www.meyersonfirm.com

________________________________________________________________
August 17 , 2015

Via E-filing Honorable Justice David Puryear
Honorable Justice Bob Pemberton
Honorable Justice Scott Field
3 rd Court of Appeals
209 West 14 th St., Room 101 Austin, Texas 78701

Re: Verticor, Ltd. v. Michael Wood, Appellate Cause No. 03-14 -00277 -CV, In the Cou rt of Appeals for the Third District of Texas (at Austin)

To the Honorable Justices:

This letter is written to respectfully request the 3 rd Court of Appeals rule on the pending interlocutory appeal in Cause No. 03-14 -00277

- CV . As the Court is aware, Appellant Verticor, Ltd. filed its Notice of Appeal on May 2, 2014. This is an accelerated appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 28.1(a) and § 51.014(a)(9) of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code. Briefs were filed by both parties and oral argument was heard on October 8, 2014. Since that date, no ruling has been issued by the Court. In an effort to allow this case to move forward in the trial court, Appellee Michael Wood is formally requesting the Court rule on the pending appeal. Should the Court have any questions, please contact our office.

Sincerely,

Jeff. M. Meyerson

cc: Mr. David E. Chamberlain Ms. Catherine L. Kyle ACCEPTED 03-14-00277-CV 6524656 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/17/2015 2:05:17 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Mark R. Goldston, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Online, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the Registrant and we have:



5.     The
Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's
auditors and to the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: February 27, 2009

/s/ MARK R. GOLDSTON Mark R. Goldston Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

REALTIME DATA, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CME GROUP, INC., BOARD OF TRADE OF THE 

CITY OF CHICAGO, INC., NEW YORK 

MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants

BATS TRADING, INC., AKA BATS EXCHANGE, 

INC., INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE,

NASDAQ OMX GROUP, INC., NASDAQ OMX PHLX,

INC., NYSE EURONEXT, OPTIONS PRICE 

REPORTING AUTHORITY, NYSE ARCA, INC., 

NYSE AMEX, LLC, SECURITIES INDUSTRY 

AUTOMATION CORPORATION,

Defendants

______________________ 

2014-1663, 2014-1664, 2014-1665

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of New York in Nos. 1:11-cv-06697-

KBF, 1:11-cv-06699-KBF, 1:11-cv-06702-KBF, Judge 

Katherine B. Forrest.
 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

BRETT E. COOPER, McKool Smith, P.C., New York, NY, 

argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by DIRK D.

THOMAS, Washington, DC; LAURA A. HANDLEY, Dallas, 

TX.

MICHAEL HAWES, Baker Botts, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by 

SCOTT F. PARTRIDGE. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PLAGER, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 14, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
§ 3276.11 What information must I include for each well in the monthly report of well operations? ( a ) Any drilling operations or changes made to a well;
( b ) Total production or injection in thousands of pounds (klbs);
( c ) Production or injection temperature in degrees Fahrenheit (deg. F);
( d ) Production or injection pressure in pounds per square inch (psi). You must also specify whether this is gauge pressure (psig) or absolute pressure (psia);
( e ) The number of days the well was producing or injecting;
( f ) The well status at the end of the month;
( g ) The amount of steam or hot water lost to venting or leakage, if the amount is greater than 0.5 percent of total lease production. We may modify this standard by a written order describing the change;
( h ) The lease number or unit name where the well is located;
( i ) The month and year to which the report applies;
( j ) Your name, title, signature, and a phone number where BLM may contact you; and
( k ) Any other information that we may require.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22538]



[[Page 60142]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Economics and Statistics Administration


Bureau of Economic Analysis Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Bureau of Economic Analysis.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-
463 as amended by Public Law 94-409, Public Law 96-523, and Public Law 
97-375), we are giving notice of a meeting of the Bureau of Economic 
Analysis Advisory Committee. The meeting's agenda is as follows: 1. 
Welcome and Update on BEA Activities, 2. Measuring the Real Output of 
Government: The Case of Education, 3. Profits, Pensions, and 
Compensation, 4. Researchers and Getting Access to BEA Data, and 5. 
International Outsourcing and Other Issues.

DATES: Friday, November 5, 2004, the meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and 
adjourn at approximately 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Washington Plaza Hotel, 
10 Thomas Circle, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Steven Landefeld, Director, Bureau 
of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 
20230; telephone number: (202) 606-9600.
    Public Participation: This meeting is open to the public. Because 
of security procedures, anyone planning to attend the meeting must 
contact Nancy Bryan of BEA at (202) 606-9698 in advance. The meeting is 
physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for foreign 
language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to 
Nancy Bryan at (202) 606-9698.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee was established September 2, 
1999, to advise the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) on matters 
related to the development and improvement of BEA's regional economic 
accounts and proposed revisions to the International System of National 
Accounts. This will be the Committee's eighth meeting.

    Dated: September 30, 2004.
J. Steven Landefeld,
Director, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
[FR Doc. 04-22538 Filed 10-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-06-P
**TABLE OFCONTENTS********Task Force onAssistance to Families of Aviation Disasters********October 29, 1997**

Introduction 

About the Recommendations 

Recommendations: 

- Guidelines to assist air carriers in        responding to aviation disasters 
- Recommendations to ensure that families of        non-U.S. citizens involved in an aviation disaster        receive appropriate assistance from both the airline and        the U.S. government 
- Recommendations to improve the passenger        manifests (or other systems) used by the airlines to        establish points of contact with families of passengers 
- Recommendations on uniform guidelines for        medical examiners and coroners on the identification of        the remains of victims  
- Findings on the extent to which military        experts and facilities are used to aid in the recovery        efforts and subsequent identification efforts following        an aviation disaster 
- Recommendations to ensure that state mental        health licensing laws do not act to prevent out-of-state        mental health practitioners from working at the site of        an aviation disaster or other sites to assist survivors,        family members, and those involved in the recovery effort 
- Recommendations on methods to improve the        treatment of families by the legal community, including        methods to ensure that attorneys do not intrude on the        privacy of families of passengers involved in an aviation        disaster  
- Recommendations on methods to ensure that        representatives of media organizations do not intrude on        the privacy of families of passengers involved in an        aviation disaster 
- Findings and recommendations on the        availability of information from cockpit voice recorders  
- Recommendations concerning the NTSB        "party system" used during the accident        investigation process 

Appendix A: Listing of Recommendations 

Appendix B: Task Force Membership

Appendix C: Task Force Staff 

Appendix D: Special Acknowledgments 

Appendix E: Aviation Disaster Family Assistance Actof 1996

Appendix F: Aviation Disaster Assistance Guide
San Mateo, CA
                                                       February 16, 1999
                                                       $175,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of one hundred  seventy-five  thousand  dollars  ($175,000),  with
interest  from the date hereof at a rate of ten percent  (10%) per annum,  which
amount shall be secured by all of the assets of Borrower.  Said principal  shall
be due and  payable on demand by Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,
but in no event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred  eighty (180)
days after the date of this Note.  This Note may be prepaid at any time  without
penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1. Subordination - Creditor  subordinates to Imperial Bank ("Bank") any
security  interest or lien that  Creditor  may have in any property of Borrower.
All Subordinated  Debt is subordinated in right of payment to all obligations of
Borrower to Bank now existing or hereafter arising.

         2.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         3. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         4.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 16 day of February, 1999.

                                            Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                            By: __________________

                                            Title: ________________
#### Hart *v.*The State.

Fish, C. J.

While the evidence for the State was ample to authorize the verdict finding the accused guilty of the offense of murder, there was evidence for the accused which tended to show that two brothers and their aunt, accompanied by the decedent, went to the house of the ac*357eused for the purpose of demanding of him a settlement of certain claims of the aunt against him; that when one of the brothers demanded such a settlement, the accused contended ' that there was nothing to be settled, as he had already made a settlement with the lady; whereupon the man who had demanded the settlement applied opprobrious and abusive language to the accused, who advanced upon him as if to resent such language with a blow'of the fist, and the user of the opprobrious language ran his hand under his coat as if to draw a weapon; whereupon, the accused, who had come out to meet the visitors, turned and went back into his house and returned at once with a Winchester rifle, and he and the party who had used the abusive words, who then had a pistol in his hand, immediately began shooting at each other, the first shot from the rifle of the accused striking and ultimately, killing the decedent, who, relatively to the accused, was standing beyond and in a line with the person at whom the accused was shooting. This evidence was sufficient to require a charge on the law of voluntary manslaughter, upon the theory that the decedent was unintentionally shot and killed by the accused, while he was engaged in a mutual combat with another person, which was the result of sudden heat of passion and willingness to fight in both combatants, and that -the accused shot in hot blood and without malice. *Gann*v. *State,*30 *Ga.*67; *McDuffie*v. *State,*90 *Ga.*787 (17 S. E. 105); *Caruthes*v. *State,*95 *Ga.*343 (22 S. E. 837).

November 16, 1910.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Mitchell. Colquitt superior court. July 1, 1910.

*James Humphreys, Edwin L. Bryan,*and *J. W. Walters’,*for plaintiff in error. II. *A. Hall, attorney-general, J. S. Bidgdill, solicitor-general, J. A. Willces, Shipp & Kline,*and *W. A. Covington,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-91,011-01

EX P ARTE JAMES HAROLD MOON, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR-16- 26034-A IN THE 336TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM F ANNIN C OUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of ag g rava ted assault and sentenc ed to twenty -five y ear s’ imprisonment. The Six th Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Moon v. State , No. 06-17- 00142-CR (Tex. App.—Texarkana de l. May 24, 2018). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of convic tion, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Be fore this Court rec eived the habea s application, the trial court had order ed a response from t ri al counsel. The rec ord provided to this Court, howeve r, has no such response , and there ar e n o finding s from the trial court. The application is rema nded to t he trial c ourt to allow the t rial j udg e to complete an e videntiary investiga tion and enter

finding s.2

T h e t rial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law resolving the disputed fac tual issues within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The trial court may also make any other finding s and conclusions that it deems appropr iate. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court t h e trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts fr o m h ea ring s and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of ti me must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: April 1, 2020 Do not publish
# Euroopan unionin C 249I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 249I |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 63. vuosikerta29. heinäkuu 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 249I

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

63. vuosikerta29. heinäkuu 2020

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Tiedotteet |
| | EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET |
| | Neuvosto |
| 2020/C 249 I/01 | Eurojustin työjärjestyksen muutosten hyväksyminen | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

IV   Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Neuvosto

2020/C 249 I/01

Eurojustin työjärjestyksen muutosten hyväksyminen

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

IV Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Neuvosto

| 29.7.2020 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 249/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2020

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 249/1

---

Eurojustin työjärjestyksen muutosten hyväksyminen

(2020/C 249 I/01)

Eurojustin kollegio hyväksyi 24 päivänä heinäkuuta 2020 Eurojustin työjärjestyksen (1) muutokset. Muutokset ovat 23 päivänä heinäkuuta 2020 hyväksytyn neuvoston täytäntöönpanopäätöksen (EU) 2020/1114 (2) liitteenä.

Eurojustin kollegion puolesta

Ladislav HAMRAN

Eurojustin puheenjohtaja

---

(1)  Neuvosto hyväksyi työjärjestyksen 19 päivänä joulukuuta 2019 täytäntöönpanopäätöksellä (EU) 2019/2250 (EUVL L 336, 30.12.2019, s. 309) ja kollegio 20 päivänä joulukuuta 2019 (EUVL L 50, 24.2.2020, s. 1.).

1

(2)  EUVL L 244, 29.7.2020, s. 13.

2

---