alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from UniDyn,  Corp. March 31, 2000 financial statements and is
                  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
                  statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                  0000894542
<NAME>                                 UniDyn, Corp.
<CURRENCY>                             US



<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1.00
<CASH>                                                  1,067,531
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           443,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             371,736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        1,908,720
<PP&E>                                                  588,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                          29,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          7,888,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   329,321
<BONDS>                                                 1,002,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                35,103
<OTHER-SE>                                              6,521,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            7,888,298
<SALES>                                                 698,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        698,646
<CGS>                                                   340,978
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           340,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        831,545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      54,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (473,877)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (473,877)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (473,877)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.01)



</TABLE>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Southern Florida

SANDRA SHEPHERD and EARL SHEPHERD,

individually,

U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS

TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET

INVESTMENT LOAN TRUST, MORTGAGE

PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES

2005-4,

20-cv-14157

U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

425 WALNUT STREET

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202

Jeff Barnes, Esq.

W.J. Barnes, P.A.

1515 N. Federal Hwy., Ste. 300

Boca Raton, FL 33432

jeff@wjbarneslaw.com

May 20, 2020 s/ C. Barnes-Butler

Case 2:20-cv-14157-RLR Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/20/2020 Page 1 of 1
§ 4.1601 Basis for appeal. ( a ) An appeal may be based only on a specific alleged material deviation (or deviations) by the agency from the provisions of OMB Circular A-76 or Supplement No. 1 thereto, the “Cost Comparison Handbook.” Appeals may not be based on other factors, such as the economic impact of the agency's decision on a community, or other socioeconomic issues.
( b ) This appeals procedure shall be used only to resolve questions of the determination between contract and in-house performance of a commercial or industrial type requirement, and shall not apply to questions concerning award to one contractor in preference to another.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Erie Railroad Company, Respondent, against State Tax Commission, Appellant.

All concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFast casual multicastA new protocol is presented that efficiently implements a reliable, causally ordered multicast primitive and is easily extended into a totally ordered one. Intended for use in the ISIS toolkit, it offers a way to bypass the most costly aspects of ISIS while benefiting from virtual synchrony. The facility scales with bounded overhead. Measured speedups of more than an order of magnitude were obtained when the protocol was implemented within ISIS. One conclusion is that systems such as ISIS can achieve performance competitive with the best existing multicast facilities--a finding contradicting the widespread concern that fault-tolerance may be unacceptably costly.Document ID19900014743Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBirman, Kenneth*(Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (Switzerland). Ithaca, NY, United States)*Schiper, Andre*(Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne)*Stephenson, Pat*(Cornell Univ.)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 10, 1990Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186643NAS 1.26:186643Accession Number90N24059Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: ARPA ORDER 6037CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG2-593CONTRACT_GRANT: N00140-87-C-8904Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014743.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
(No. 1104

Claim denied.)

#### William R. Reichert, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 29, 1927.*

Governmental *function*— State *not liable for injuries sustained by its employees.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court in case of *Baxter*v. *State, supra,*

Lagger & Blatt, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Roy D. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant in this case filed his declaration on December 9, 1926, and asks an award on account of injuries sustained by him on April 16, 1926, he, being superintendent of the State Honor Farm at Statesville, stopped a team of runaway horses, driven by a convict. The horses were hitched to a hay rack, picking up loose boards about the yard near the office. The horses becoming frightened and with no one . controlling them ran away and headed south towards the barn. Mr. Reichert saw the runaway and attempting to stop the team was pinned between the barn and the hay rack. Various other employees and inmates,- seeing the accident, hurried up and released Mr. Reichert, who was then taken to the hospital. His injuries consisted of a fracture of the right shoulder, a laceration of the muscles and ligaments of that shoulder; two ribs on the right side were fractured, and his right arm has become somewhat disabled.

To the declaration filed, the Attorney General of the State of Illinois has filed a demurrer, which, as a matter of law, is sustained.

It appears to us that the claimant in this case unnecessarily placed himself in a position of danger. It does not appear that he has any permanent injuries, and there is no claim presented for loss of time or for medical services, so it is presumed that these have been compensated for, consequently, no award is made.
No. 32,917

#### Elvin Wilson, *Appellant,*v. Helen Woolverton, *Appellee.*

(56 P. 2d 460)

Opinion filed April 17, 1936.

/. *Glenn Logan*and *Harold E. Doherty,*both of Topeka, for the appellant.

*Robert Stone, James A. McClure, Robert L. Webb, Beryl R. Johnson*and *Ralph W. Oman,*all of Topeka, for the appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

Order to make additional party, and for additional party to set up claim, determined no question of law or fact in favor of or against anybody and is not an appealable order.
Searched for **http://www.drugabuse.gov/news-events/nida-notes/articles/term/395/prevention**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.drugabuse.gov/news-events/nida-notes/articles/term/395/prevention**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### § 3508.11 What lands are available for competitive leasing?

BLM may issue a competitive lease on unleased lands where we know that a valuable mineral deposit exists. In such areas, before issuing a lease we may issue you an exploration license, but not a prospecting permit. However, BLM may offer competitive leases for lands where no prospecting or exploratory work is needed to determine the existence or workability of a valuable mineral deposit. In addition, we may offer competitive leases for asphalt on any lands available for asphalt leasing, whether or not we know that a valuable mineral deposit exists.
#### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor NAJERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-3985.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

March 3, 2006.

*996Madeleine S. Murphy, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard H. Parsons, Jonathan E. Hawley, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, and Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Victor Najera pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. § 846. In sentencing him, Judge Matthew F. Kennelly treated the guidelines as mandatory in accordance with the law as it existed before *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Following *Booker,*we ordered a limited remand, pursuant to *United States v. Paladino,*401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.2005), so the judge could inform us whether he would have sentenced Najera differently had he known the sentencing guidelines were merely advisory.

In response to our order, Judge Kennelly stated that he would have imposed a lower sentence. We invited the parties to file position statements concerning the appropriate disposition of the case. Only Najera has responded, and he concurs with the district court that resentencing is appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Najera’s sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for resentencing.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Thomas R. Moyes,
certify that:  1.    The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 (the
Report) of MediCor Ltd. (the Company), fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MediCor. Date: September 20, 2004/s/ Thomas R. MoyesThomas R. MoyesChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         119,187               1,452,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,951,450               9,432,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                   130,086                 124,086
<INVENTORY>                                  4,221,208               4,035,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,711,586              16,002,051
<PP&E>                                       1,696,452               1,552,836
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,028,943                 871,977
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,578,292              18,327,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,841,987               7,555,703
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         5,768                   5,761
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,730,537              10,765,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,578,292              18,327,115
<SALES>                                     16,312,324              18,472,791
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,312,324              18,472,791
<CGS>                                       12,102,132              12,332,528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,102,132              12,332,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,794,000               4,975,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               159,231                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             303,215               (101,543)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,046,254)               1,266,585
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (959,570)                 429,286
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,086,684)                 837,299
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.36)                     .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)                     .11
                                                                                

</TABLE>
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3886 — Aster 2/Flint Ink)

(2005/C 263/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 25 August 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

DAVID FITZGERALD,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 202 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30225 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DERRICK L. FIELDS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:05-CR-50046-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Derrick L. Fields appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and for possessing a stolen firearm. He argues that the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence of the firearm, which was seized pursuant to a search warrant. Because the affidavit supporting the search warrant was more than a “bare bones” affidavit, the officers who executed the warrant relied on it in good faith, and evidence of the firearm was admissible. See United States v. Satterwhite , 980 F.2d 317, 320-21 (5th Cir. 1992).No. 06-30225 -2-
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             465
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      327
<ALLOWANCES>                                        58
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   905
<PP&E>                                             543
<DEPRECIATION>                                     391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,924
<COMMON>                                        10,427
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,759)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,057
<SALES>                                            416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   416
<CGS>                                              377
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,070)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,070)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.33)



</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Medicare coverage of diabetessupplies & services.**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2008
2012 | 2013 | 2016 | 2018 | 2019
 
SuDoc:HE 22.2:D 54/3/
Item Number:0512-A-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000946465
 
November 6, 2017
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a), AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
S. Bradford Antle, certify that:



Date:
March 12, 2008

| |  | By: |                                                        
| |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------
| |  |     | /s/S. BRADFORD ANTLE                                   
| |  |     | S. Bradford Antle
President and Chief Executive Officer

---



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a), AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Thomas E. Dunn, certify that:



Date:
March 12, 2008

| |  | By: |                                                                               
| |  | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |     | /s/THOMAS E. DUNN                                                             
| |  |     | Thomas E. Dunn
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

---



QuickLinks
§ 3838.12 What must I include in a NOITL on SRHA lands? A NOITL must include: ( a ) The names, mailing address, and telephone numbers of everyone who is filing the NOITL. An agent may file the NOITL on behalf of others as long as the NOITL is accompanied with proof that the agent is authorized to act on behalf of the others.
( b ) Information about the surface owners, including: ( 1 ) The names, mailing addresses, and telephone numbers of all known surface owners of the parcel of land you want to enter;
( 2 ) Evidence of surface ownership of all parcels covered by the NOITL obtained from the tax records of the local government. The evidence must show the name of the persons paying the taxes, and must contain a legal description of the taxed parcel.
( 3 ) A description of the lands covered by the NOITL, including: ( i ) The total number of acres to the nearest whole acre; and
( ii ) A map and legal land description to the nearest 5-acre subdivision or lot based on a U.S. Public Land Survey of the lands covered by the NOITL, including access routes; and
( 4 ) A brief description of the proposed mineral activities, including: ( i ) The name, mailing address, and telephone number of the person who will be managing the activities, and
( ii ) A list of the dates on which the activities will take place.