alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 804

Claim denied.)

#### Gardner Governor Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 10, 1927.*

Franchise *tax*— when *court without jurisdiction to refund.*This case is governed by the decision of the court in *Moline Plow Co.*v. *State, supra.*

John T. Inghram, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Edward C. Fitch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

For the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in this court in the case of *Moline Plow Company*v. *State of Illinois,*No. 687a, this claim is disallowed.
### **Subchapter A—Jeopardy**

Part
I.
Termination of taxable year.
II.
Jeopardy assessments.
III.
Special rules with respect to certain cash.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §330(b), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 620, added item for part III.
Case 1:20-cv-21927-RKA   Document 22-3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/30/2020   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-21927-RKA   Document 22-3   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/30/2020   Page 2 of 2
### §5309. Use of excess funds

Beginning in fiscal year 1998 and thereafter, where the actual costs of construction projects under self-determination contracts, compacts, or grants, pursuant to Public Laws 93–638, 103–413, or 100–297, are less than the estimated costs thereof, use of the resulting excess funds shall be determined by the appropriate Secretary after consultation with the tribes.

(Pub. L. 105–83, title III, §310, Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1590.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Public Law 93–638, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, known as the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

Public Law 103–413, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 103–413, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4250, known as the Indian Self-Determination Act Amendments of 1994, which is classified principally to subchapter IV (§5361 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1994 Amendment note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

Public Law 100–297, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 100–297, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 130, known as the Augustus F. Hawkins-Robert T. Stafford Elementary and Secondary School Improvement Amendments of 1988. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1988 Amendments note set out under section 6301 of Title 20, Education, and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1998, and not as part of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act which comprises this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 450e–2 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(d) [title III, §310], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–181, 3009–221.

Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(c) [title III, §310], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–156, 1321–197; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.
#### Mary Louisa Campion, Appellant, v. The Roman Catholic Orphan Asylum in the City of New York, Respondent, Impleaded with Others. (Action No. 1.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
               This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted
               from  Claire   Technologies,   Inc.   March  31,  1997  financial
               statements  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
               financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000894546
<NAME>                        Claire Technologies, Inc.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         897
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               897
<PP&E>                                         30,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,203)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 24,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          832,803
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,640
<OTHER-SE>                                     (816,602)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   24,841
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               99,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             30,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (130,124)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (130,124)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (130,124)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         4,311,900
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        2,184,400
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          2,246,200
<EQUITIES>                                      91,700
<MORTGAGE>                                      49,600
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   43,400
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               6,972,700
<CASH>                                          32,700
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         272,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,890,800
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 778,000
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        5,540,300
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                161,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          225,000<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     566,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,890,800
<PREMIUMS>                                      46,800
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            127,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              10,200
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   3,200
<BENEFITS>                                     109,200
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     14,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            21,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (800)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of subsidiary trusts
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB of Wisedriver.com, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2004, I, Joshua Berger, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisedriver.com, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

1.              Such Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.              The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Wisedriver.com, Inc.

 

| Dated: | April 14, 2005 |
|--------|----------------|

 

Wisedriver.com, Inc.

 

By:  */s/ Joshua Berger*

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
§ 3250.10 When do the exploration operations regulations apply? ( a ) The exploration operations regulations contained in this subpart and subparts 3251 through 3256 apply to geothermal exploration operations: ( 1 ) On BLM-administered public lands, whether or not they are leased for geothermal resources; and
( 2 ) On lands whose surface is managed by another Federal agency, where BLM has leased the subsurface geothermal resources and the lease operator wishes to conduct exploration. In this case, we will consult with the surface managing agency regarding surface use and reclamation requirements before we approve the exploration operations.
( b ) These regulations do not apply to: ( 1 ) Unleased land administered by another Federal agency;
( 2 ) Unleased geothermal resources whose surface land is managed by another Federal agency;
( 3 ) Privately owned land; or
( 4 ) Casual use activities.
§ 3809.101 What special provisions apply to minerals that may be common variety minerals, such as sand, gravel, and building stone? ( a ) *Mineral examination report.* On mining claims located on or after July 23, 1955, you must not initiate operations for minerals that may be “common variety” minerals, as defined in § 3711.1(b) of this title, until BLM has prepared a mineral examination report, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Interim authorization.* Until the mineral examination report described in paragraph (a) of this section is prepared, BLM will allow notice-level operations or approve a plan of operations for the disputed mining claim for— ( 1 ) Operations limited to taking samples to confirm or corroborate mineral exposures that are physically disclosed and existing on the mining claim;
( 2 ) Performance of the minimum necessary annual assessment work under § 3851.1 of this title; or
( 3 ) Operations to remove possible common variety minerals if you establish an escrow account in a form acceptable to BLM. You must make regular payments to the escrow account for the appraised value of possible common variety minerals removed under a payment schedule approved by BLM. The funds in the escrow account must not be disbursed to the operator or to the U.S. Treasury until a final determination of whether the mineral is a common variety and therefore salable under part 3600 of this title.
( c ) *Determination of common variety.* If the mineral examination report under paragraph (a) of this section concludes that the minerals are common variety minerals, you may either relinquish your mining claim(s) or BLM will initiate contest proceedings. Upon relinquishment or final departmental determination that the mining claim(s) is null and void, you must promptly close and reclaim your operations unless you are authorized to proceed under parts 3600 and 3610 of this title.
( d ) *Disposal.* BLM may dispose of common variety minerals from unpatented mining claims in accordance with the provisions of § 3601.14 of this chapter.
[65 FR 70112, Nov. 21, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 58910, Nov. 23, 2001]
§ 3179.10 Definitions and acronyms. As used in this subpart, the term: *Automatic ignition system* means an automatic ignitor and, where necessary to ensure continuous combustion, a continuous pilot flame.
*Capture* means the physical containment of natural gas for transportation to market or productive use of natural gas and includes reinjection and royalty-free on-site uses pursuant to subpart 3178.
*Compressor station* means any permanent combination of one or more compressors that move natural gas at increased pressure through gathering or transmission pipelines, or into or out of storage. This includes, but is not limited to, gathering and boosting stations and transmission compressor stations. The combination of one or more compressors located at a well site, or located at an onshore natural gas processing plant, is not a compressor station.
*Gas-to-oil ratio (GOR)* means the ratio of gas to oil in the production stream expressed in standard cubic feet of gas per barrel of oil at standard conditions.
*Gas well* means a well for which the energy equivalent of the gas produced, including its entrained liquefiable hydrocarbons, exceeds the energy equivalent of the oil produced. Unless more specific British thermal unit (Btu) values are available, a well with a gas-to-oil ratio greater than 6,000 standard cubic feet (scf) of gas per barrel of oil is a gas well.
*High-pressure flare* means an open-air flare stack or flare pit designed for the combustion of natural gas that would normally go to sales.
*Leak* means a release of natural gas from a component that is not associated with normal operation of the component, when such release is: ( 1 ) A hydrocarbon emission detected by use of an optical-gas-imaging instrument;
( 2 ) At least 500 ppm of hydrocarbon detected using a portable analyzer or other instrument that can measure the quantity of the release; or
( 3 ) A hydrocarbon emission detected via audio, visual, and olfactory means or visible bubbles detected using soap solution. Releases due to normal operation of equipment intended to vent as part of normal operations, such as gas-driven pneumatic controllers and safety-release devices, are not leaks unless the releases exceed the quantities and frequencies expected during normal operations. Releases due to operator errors or equipment malfunctions or from control equipment at levels that exceed applicable regulatory requirements, such as releases from an oil storage tank hatch left open, or an improperly sized combustor, are leaks.
*Liquids unloading* means the removal of an accumulation of liquid hydrocarbons or water from the wellbore of a completed gas well.
*Lost oil or lost gas* means produced oil or gas that escapes containment, either intentionally or unintentionally, or is flared before being removed from the lease, unit, or communitized area, and cannot be recovered.
*Low-pressure flare* means any flare that does not meet the definition of high-pressure flare.
*Pneumatic controller* means an automated instrument used for maintaining a process condition, such as liquid level, pressure, delta-pressure, or temperature.
U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Docket ID: FAA-2015-2953 Request for Amendment 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Detroit Aircraft, L.L.C. currently has a pending petition for exemption in the above-referenced 

docket. This letter is to inform the FAA of a recent change to the name of the company. Detroit 

Aircraft, L.L.C. converted to Detroit Aircraft Corporation. Petitioner hereby requests that the 

FAA amend the application to reflect this change. 

Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned with any questions about this change or the 

petition for exemption. 

Sincerely, 

on R. Rimanelli 

CEO 

August 10, 2015
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCalculation of flight vibration levels of the AH-1G helicopter and correlation with existing flight vibration measurementsBoeing Helicopters, together with other U.S. Helicopter manufacturers, participated in a finite element applications program to give the United States a superior capability to utilize finite element analysis models in support of helicopter airframe design. The program was sponsored by the NASA Langley Research Center. Under this program, an activity was sponsored to evaluate existing analysis methods applicable to calculate coupled rotor-airframe vibrations. The helicopter used in this evaluation was the AH-1G helicopter. The results of the Boeing Helicopters efforts are summarized. The planned analytical procedure is reviewed. Changes to the planned procedure are discussed, and results of the correlation study are presented.Document ID19900009427Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDitaranto, R. A.*(Boeing Helicopter Co. Philadelphia, PA, United States)*Sankewitsch, V.*(Boeing Helicopter Co. Philadelphia, PA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1989Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-181923NAS 1.26:181923Accession Number90N18743Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-51-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-17497Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900009427.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 3, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00178

- CV

Freddie L. House, Appellant

v.

Clauklin, LLC and Jamodi, LLC, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PU RYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS DAY came on to be submitted to this Court appellant’ s motion to dismiss the appeal in the

above cause, and the Court having fully considered said motion, and be ing of the opinion that

same should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that said

motion is granted, and that the appeal is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant

p ay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this C ourt and the court below; and that this decision

be certified below for observance.
# Multiple Choices

`/mp/cvpcp/proposals.php`

Available documents:- /mp/cvpcp/proposals.html  (common basename) /mp/cvpcp/proposals (common basename)Please consider informing the owner of the referring page about the broken link.
### §403a. Lease of lands on Port Madison and Snohomish or Tulalip Indian Reservations in Washington

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any Indian lands on the Port Madison and Snohomish or Tulalip Indian Reservations in the State of Washington, may be leased by the Indians with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, and upon such terms and conditions as he may prescribe, for a term not exceeding twenty-five years: Provided, however, That such leases may provide for renewal for an additional term not exceeding twenty-five years, and the Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized to prescribe such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.

(Oct. 9, 1940, ch. 781, 54 Stat. 1057.)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFeasibility study for a microwave-powered ozone sniffer aircraft, volume 2Using 3-D design techniques and the Advanced Surface Design Software on the Computervision Designer V-X Interactive Graphics System, the aircraft configuration was created. The canard, tail, vertical tail, and main wing were created on the system using Wing Generator, a Computervision based program introduced in Appendix A.2. The individual components of the plane were created separately and were later individually imported to the master database. An isometric view of the final configuration is presented.Document ID19900016651Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186676NAS 1.26:186676Accession Number90N25967Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4435Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016651.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case Number: 20-22162-CIV-MARTINEZ-OTAZO-REYES

JULIO LEE HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GALENOS MEDICAL CENTER CORP., and 

MARIA C. ELROY,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES IN FLSA CASES

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte examination of the record. The 

Court notes that this is a Fair Labor Standards Act case, in which Plaintiff seeks unpaid wages. In 

order to assist the Court in the management of the case, the parties are ORDERED to comply with 

the following procedures:

1. Plaintiff shall file a statement of claim setting forth the amount of alleged unpaid 

wages, the calculation of such wages, and the nature of the wages (e.g. overtime or regular) within 

twenty (20) days from the date below. Plaintiff shall promptly serve a copy of this notice and the 

statement on each Defendant’s counsel when counsel for a Defendant first appears in the case or 

at the time of filing if a Defendant’s counsel has already appeared in the case. 

2. Each Defendant shall file a response within fifteen (15) days of receiving service 

of Plaintiff=s statement, setting forth in detail any defenses to Plaintiff’s claims. 

3. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of 

appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default. 

 DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 2nd day of September, 2020.

_____________________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to:

Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes

All Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-22162-JEM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2020 Page 1 of 1