alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 20-cv-21842-UU

ANTONIO ALVAREZ,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CORE HOME SECURITY, LLC d/b/a

SMARTY HOME SECURITY,

Defendants. 

________________________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With 

Prejudice (the “Joint Stipulation”). D.E. 8.

THE COURT has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record and is otherwise fully 

advised in the premises. It is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims 

that were or could have been raised in this action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each 

party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs related to this action. It further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Clerk of Court SHALL administratively close this 

case. All future hearings and deadlines are CANCELLED, and all pending motions are DENIED 

AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this _3d_ day of June, 2020.

 _______________________________ 

URSULA UNGARO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:20-cv-21842-UU Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 1 of 2
Copies provided: 

All counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-21842-UU Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### Leslie McMillen, Appellant, v. James Van Epps, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ. [179 Misc. 851.]
PUBLIC LAW 108–477—DEC. 21, 2004 118 STAT. 3903

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5370:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Nov. 19, considered and passed House.

Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–477

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4985 Moorhead

Avenue in Boulder, Colorado, as the ‘‘Donald G. Brotzman Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

4985 Moorhead Avenue in Boulder, Colorado, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Donald G. Brotzman Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Donald

G. Brotzman Post Office Building’’.

Approved December 21, 2004.

Dec. 21, 2004

[H.R. 5370]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApplication of artificial neural networks to composite ply micromechanicsArtificial neural networks can provide improved computational efficiency relative to existing methods when an algorithmic description of functional relationships is either totally unavailable or is complex in nature. For complex calculations, significant reductions in elapsed computation time are possible. The primary goal is to demonstrate the applicability of artificial neural networks to composite material characterization. As a test case, a neural network was trained to accurately predict composite hygral, thermal, and mechanical properties when provided with basic information concerning the environment, constituent materials, and component ratios used in the creation of the composite. A brief introduction on neural networks is provided along with a description of the project itself.Document ID19910015032Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBrown, D. A.*(Wooster Coll. OH., United States)*Murthy, P. L. N.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Berke, L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-104365E-6162NAS 1.15:104365Meeting InformationMeeting: Engineering Mechanics ConferenceLocation: Columbus, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: May 19, 1991End Date: May 22, 1991Sponsors:American Society of Civil EngineersAccession Number91N24345Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 307-50-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910015032.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
No. 14,699.

#### Silver State Building and Loan Association *v.*State of Colorado.

(106 P. [2d] 872)

Decided October 21, 1940.

Messrs. Koperlik & Altman, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Byron G. Rogers, Attorney General, Mr. Henry E. Lutz, Deputy, for the state.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Bakke

delivered the opinion of the court.

*519Plaintiff in error asserts that this case is governed by *State v. Colorado Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.,*104 Colo. 436, 91 P. (2d) 481, and defendant in error agrees. The sole question presented is, Shall we overrule the decision? We decline to do so.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Hilliard and Mr. Justice Young not participating.
Term 91 Conditions and Year Type 1990 - 2002

Year Term 91 Year Type

1990 5/14 - 8/31 Critical (SRI)

1991 6/10 - 8/31 Critical (SRI)

1992 5/21 - 11/15 Critical (SRI)

1993 7/27 - 8/31 Above Normal (SRI)

1994 6/15 - 8/31 Critical (SRI)

1995 None Wet (SRI)

1996 7/22 - 8/20 Wet (SRI)

1997 6/18 - 8/24 Wet (SRI)

1998 None Wet (SRI)

1999 6/29 - 8/18 Wet (SRI)

2000 6/28 - 8/16 Above Normal (SRI)

2001 6/4 – 8/31 Dry (SVI)

2002 6/7-8/31 Dry (SVI)

SVI = Sac Valley Index

SRI = Sac River Index
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4885 

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, 

to reauthorize the Missing Americans Alert Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2022 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement 

Act of 1994, to reauthorize the Missing Americans Alert 

Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kevin and Avonte’s 

5 Law Reauthorization Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE MISSING AMERICANS 

7 ALERT PROGRAM. 

8 Section 240001(d) of the Violent Crime Control and 

9 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 12621(d)) is 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4885 IS

1 amended by striking ‘‘2018 through 2022’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘2023 through 2027’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn evaluation of three two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics codes including low Reynolds numbers and transonic Mach numbersFull-potential, Euler, and Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes were evaluated for use in analyzing the flow field about airfoils sections operating at Mach numbers from 0.20 to 0.60 and Reynolds numbers from 500,000 to 2,000,000. The potential code (LBAUER) includes weakly coupled integral boundary layer equations for laminar and turbulent flow with simple transition and separation models. The Navier-Stokes code (ARC2D) uses the thin-layer formulation of the Reynolds-averaged equations with an algebraic turbulence model. The Euler code (ISES) includes strongly coupled integral boundary layer equations and advanced transition and separation calculations with the capability to model laminar separation bubbles and limited zones of turbulent separation. The best experiment/CFD correlation was obtained with the Euler code because its boundary layer equations model the physics of the flow better than the other two codes. An unusual reversal of boundary layer separation with increasing angle of attack, following initial shock formation on the upper surface of the airfoil, was found in the experiment data. This phenomenon was not predicted by the CFD codes evaluated.Document ID19910007688Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHicks, Raymond M.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Cliff, Susan E.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102840A-90202NAS 1.15:102840Accession Number91N17001Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007688.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
378 P.2d 137

#### Walter R. LOTT, Petitioner, v. The FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Santa Fe, New Mexico, et al., Respondent.

No. 20 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Feb. 4, 1963.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the request for free process be and the same is hereby granted, and the petition for writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied for the reason that there is a matter pending in this court on appeal.
### Subpart A—Original Issue Discount

Sec.
1271.
Treatment of amounts received on retirement or sale or exchange of debt instruments.
1272.
Current inclusion in income of original issue discount.
1273.
Determination of amount of original issue discount.
1274.
Determination of issue price in the case of certain debt instruments issued for property.
1274A.
Special rules for certain transactions where stated principal amount does not exceed $2,800,000.
1275.
Other definitions and special rules.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1985**—Pub. L. 99–121, title I, §102(d), Oct. 11, 1985, 99 Stat. 509, added item 1274A.
### PART VII—CERTAIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS

Sec.
528.
Certain homeowners associations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XXI, §2101(a), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1897, added part heading and analysis for part VII.
EXHIBIT 12

FIRST REPUBLIC PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION

(A Majority Owned Subsidiary of First Republic Bank)

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF

RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                                                  |  |                         |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | ------
|                                                  |  | Year Ended December 31,
|($ in thousands)                                  |  | 2006                    |        | 2005 |   | 2004  
|I.       Earnings:                                |  |                         |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|Net income                                        |  | $                       | 18,456 |      | $ | 16,176 |  | $ | 16,176
|Fixed charges excluding preferred stock dividends |  |                         |       |      |   |       |  |   |      
|                                                  |  |                         |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|Earnings before fixed charges                     |  | $                       | 18,456 |      | $ | 16,176 |  | $ | 16,176
|                                                  |  |                         |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|II.     Fixed charges:                            |  |                         |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|Preferred stock dividends                         |  | $                       | 14,252 |      | $ | 14,252 |  | $ | 14,252
|                                                  |  |                         |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|III.    Ratios of earnings to fixed charges       |  |                         | 1.30x  |      |   | 1.13x  |  |   | 1.13x 
|                                                  |  |                         |        |      |   |        |  |   |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-60853-RAR

FEDIA SAMEDY, 

Plaintiff,

v.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE RESOURCES, INC.,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER REQUIRING VERIFIED AFFIDAVIT REGARDING 

INJURY-IN-FACT FOR ARTICLE III STANDING

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon sua sponte review of the record. The 

Complaint [ECF No. 1], filed on April 27, 2020, alleges violations by the Defendant of the Fair 

Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. section 1692 et seq. To have standing1 to 

pursue claims under the FDCPA, a plaintiff must allege a particularized, concrete injury-in-fact. 

Trichell v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc., No. 18-14144, 2020 WL 3634917, at *3 (11th Cir. July 6, 

2020). A plaintiff cannot show a particularized, concrete injury-in-fact by alleging that a debt 

collection letter creates a risk of misleading consumers in general. Id. at *6-7. “[A] statutory 

violation that poses a risk of concrete harm to consumers in general, but not to the individual 

plaintiff, cannot fairly be described as causing a particularized injury to the plaintiff.” Id. at *7. 

Furthermore, a risk of harm to a plaintiff that “dissipated before the complaint was filed” is 

insufficient to establish Article III standing. Id. at *8. 

1

 “A federal court not only has the power but also the obligation at any time to inquire into jurisdiction 

whenever the possibility that jurisdiction does not exist arises.” Fitzgerald v. Seaboard Sys. R.R., Inc., 760 

F.2d 1249, 1251 (11th Cir. 1985) (citations omitted). It is the Court’s responsibility to “zealously insure 

that jurisdiction exists over a case.” Smith v. GTE Corp., 236 F.3d 1292, 1299 (11th Cir. 2001).

Case 0:20-cv-60853-RAR Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2020 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Here, Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges that Defendant’s letter “falsely misrepresented 

Plaintiff’s obligation” with respect to Plaintiff’s debt and that “by and through the Collection 

Letter, Defendant wrongfully causes the least sophisticated consumer to falsely believe that he or 

she was responsible for the repayment of the Consumer Debt.” Compl. ¶ 31. However, the 

Complaint does not allege that Plaintiff was in fact misled by Defendant’s letter. 

Thus, given the Eleventh Circuit’s holding in Trichell, the named Plaintiff shall, in a filed 

and verified affidavit, explain in detail the concrete, particularized injury Plaintiff suffered as a 

result of receiving the allegedly misleading debt collection letter. The verified affidavit shall 

specify the harm that Plaintiff suffered beyond a risk of being misled that did not materialize. 

Plaintiff shall file the verified affidavit in conformance with this Order on or before July 17, 2020. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 10th day of July, 2020.

_________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-60853-RAR Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2020 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


March 26, 2021


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2061


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, NY 10286


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2061 (the
“Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-251346 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby
authorized to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/
    ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
#### § 4.477 Findings and conclusions; decision by administrative law judge.

As promptly as possible after the time allowed for presenting proposed findings and conclusions, the administrative law judge will make findings of fact and conclusions of law, unless waiver has been stipulated, and will render a decision upon all issues of material fact and law presented on the record. In doing so, he or she may adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by one or more of the parties if they are correct. The reasons for the findings, conclusions, and decision made will be stated, and along with the findings, conclusions, and decision, will become a part of the record in any further appeal. A copy of the decision must be sent by certified mail to all the parties or by electronic transmission if the parties consented to such means under the terms of OHA Standing Orders on Electronic Transmission.

[75 FR 64669, Oct. 20, 2010, as amended at 88 FR 5794, Jan. 30, 2023]
§ 3602.29 How will BLM verify my production? ( a ) You must submit at least one report per contract year of the amount of mineral materials you have mined or removed under your sales contract so BLM can verify that you have made the required payments. BLM will specify the timing of the reports in your contract or permit.
( b ) BLM may require more frequent reporting if we find it necessary.
( c ) BLM may require you to conduct pre-operation, annual, and post-operation volumetric surveys of the mine site.
I.

(All Programs)

OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT

No Member of, or Delegate to Congress, Resident Commissioner, or official

ofthe Contractor shall benefit from this contract other than as a water user or

landowner in the same manner as other water users or landowners.

Approved 2/22/71; Revised 11/84

M.24
#### Samuel S. Rondinelli, an Infant, by Rita Rondinelli, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Harold Hanson et al., Respondents.

Present— Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and MeCurn, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,609,886
<SECURITIES>                                 5,993,285
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,672,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    633,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,577,232
<PP&E>                                      12,847,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,297,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,404,117
<BONDS>                                      3,344,892
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,807
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,937,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,297,933
<SALES>                                     46,613,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,613,752
<CGS>                                       18,395,324
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,413,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             186,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,689,083
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,390,828
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,298,255
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,298,255
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94
        

</TABLE>
#### Reconstruction Finance Corporation, Respondent, v. Eastern Terra Cotta Realty Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
(No. 893

Claimant awarded $1,442.50.)

#### Robert J. Calhan and Robert Calhan, Petitioners, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Non-liability of *state*— State *not liable for overflow of water, causing damage, from Illinois & Mich. Canal.*This case is similar to that of *Allen*v. *State, supra,*and the decision of the court there announced governs this claim.

Lee O’Neil Browne, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This claim comes before the court on a declaration filed by above named claimants, for damages by them sustained by *190reason of the overflow of the Illinois and Michigan canal, by the breaking of the south bank of said canal and the lock at Marseilles, in said canal, not being opened up in time to prevent the flood waters from accumulating and backing up, so that the lands of claimants was overflowed and their crops destroyed; that this flood occurred some time in the first part of the month of August, 1924, the reasonable value of the crop destroyed being $1442.50.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, is as a matter of law, sustained.

On the grounds of social justice and equity, we award claimant the sum of $1442.50.
Exhibit 32.1


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


  /s/ Mark J. Cowan
Mark J. Cowan
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
August 10, 2006
#### Owen Duffy, Appellant, v. James E. Place, Respondent.

Order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Walsh, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mildred D. Graves, Deceased, and as Guardian of Joan Graves, an Infant, Respondent, against Tidewater Oil Sales Company et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.