alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 402.2 What lands may be sold; method of sale; limit of acreage. ( a ) Lands which may be sold under the Act of May 20, 1920 (41 Stat. 605; 43 U.S.C. 375) are lands, not otherwise reserved, which have been withdrawn in connection with a Federal irrigation project and improved at the expense of the reclamation fund for administration or other like purposes and which are no longer needed for project purposes. Not more than 160 acres of such lands may be sold to any one person. With one exception, such lands must be sold at public auction. If, however, a tract is appraised at not more than $300, it may be sold at private sale or at public auction and without regard to the provisions of the Act of May 20, 1920 respecting notice of publication and mode of sale.
( b ) Lands which may be sold under the Act of May 16, 1930 (46 Stat. 367; 43 U.S.C. 424 through 424e) are tracts of temporarily or permanently unproductive land of insufficient size to support a family. A purchaser must be a resident farm owner or entryman on the Federal irrigation project where such lands are located and is permitted to purchase not more than 160 acres or an area which together with lands already owned or entered on such project, does not exceed 320 acres. A resident farm owner means a farm owner who is actually residing on the farm he owns, and a resident entryman means a homestead entryman who is actually residing on the land in his homestead entry. These lands may be sold either at public auction or at private sale.
( c ) Lands which may be sold under the Act of March 31, 1950 (64 Stat. 39; 43 U.S.C. Sup., 375b through 375f) are tracts of land too small to be classed as farm units under the Federal reclamation laws. A purchaser must be a resident farm owner or entryman (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section) on the Federal irrigation project where such lands are located and is permitted to purchase not more than 160 acres or an area which, together with land already owned or entered on such project, does not exceed 160 irrigable acres. These lands may be sold either at public auction or at private sale.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMeasured performance of the half-scale accurate antenna reflectorA corrugated horn was designed and fabricated for use as a feed for the half-scale accurate antenna reflector. This feed allows the reflector to be used in a compact range configuration as part of a microwave reflectance measuring system. The horn design is described, and the measured farfield patterns of the horn are presented. The horn was installed at the focus of the reflector, and the nearfield of the antenna was measured. The results of these measurements are presented and discussed with respect to the compact range application.Document ID19910010037Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLambert, Kevin M.*(Analex Corp. Fairview Park, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-187047NAS 1.26:187047E-5886Accession Number91N19350Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-25776PROJECT: RTOP 650-60-20Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910010037.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
Ladies and Gentlemen:
     I, Douglas Zaccaro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Segue Software, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005    /s/  Douglas Zaccaro  Name:  Douglas Zaccaro Title:   Chief Financial Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLateral Migration and Rotational Motion of Elliptic Particles in Planar Poiseuille FlowSimulations of elliptic particulate suspensions in the planar Poiseuille flow are performed by using the lattice Boltzmann equation. Effects of the multi-particle on the lateral migration and rotational motion of both neutrally and non-neutrally buoyant elliptic particles are investigated. Low and intermediate total particle volume fraction f(sub a) = 13%, 15%, and 40% are considered in this work.Document ID20020074874Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsQi, Dewei*(University of Western Michigan Kalamazoo, MI United States)*Luo, Li-Shi*(Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering Hampton, VA United States)*Aravamuthan, Raja*(University of Western Michigan Kalamazoo, MI United States)*Strieder, William*(Notre Dame Univ. IN United States)*Bushnell, Dennis M.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 2002Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberICASE-2002-21NAS 1.26:211661NASA/CR-2002-211661Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-97046PROJECT: RTOP 505-90-52-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020074874.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Perrachon, Chief Executive Officer of TouchTunes Music Corporation ("the
Company"), have reviewed the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and based on the inquiries I have
made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that for
the periods covered by the Report:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ John Perrachon
--------------------------
John Perrachon
Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004

THIS CERTIFICATE IS BEING MADE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE BY THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE COMPANY WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 906, AND
SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A PART OF THE REPORT OR FILED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE.

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.


                                       26
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4696 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4696

   To require the Secretary of the Air Force to include the Modular 
Airborne Fire Fighting System mission as part of the basing criteria of 
     the Air Force for C-130J aircraft for the Air National Guard.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2022

Ms. Rosen (for herself and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of the Air Force to include the Modular 
Airborne Fire Fighting System mission as part of the basing criteria of 
     the Air Force for C-130J aircraft for the Air National Guard.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Modernizing Aerial Fire Fighting 
Support (MAFFS) for the National Guard Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO INCLUDE THE MODULAR AIRBORNE FIRE FIGHTING 
              SYSTEM MISSION AS PART OF THE BASING CRITERIA FOR C-130J 
              AIRCRAFT FOR THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD.

    The Secretary of the Air Force shall include the Modular Airborne 
Fire Fighting System (MAFFS) mission as part of the basing criteria of 
the Air Force for C-130J aircraft for the Air National Guard.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of CarePayment Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James T. Quist, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 15, 2011/s/ James T. QuistJames T. QuistChief Executive Officer
U.S. Department of

Transportation

Office of the Secretary

Of Transportation

March 7, 2014

1200 New Jersey Ave .. S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

Mr. Joaquin 1. Flores

President and General Manager

Aviation Services, Ltd. d/b/a Freedom Air

P.O. Box 1578

Hagatha, Guam 96932

Re: Dockets DOT-OST-2010-0153 and DOT-OST-2010-0190

Applications of Aviation Services, Ltd. d/b/a Freedom Air for Interstate and Foreign

Charter Passenger Certificate Authority

Dear Mr. Flores:

This letter is in reference to the aforementioned applications filed in the docket on June 14,2010,

on behalf of Aviation Services, Ltd. d/b/a Freedom Air ("Freedom Air") for certificate authority

to conduct interstate and foreign charter passenger operations. Nearly four years have elapsed

since the initial filing of these applications, and it has been more than two years since Freedom

Air has filed fitness information in the docket in connection with these applications.

When an application for authority is submitted to the Department, the applicant is expected to be

fully prepared to prosecute the application in a timely manner. Considering the significant

amount of time that has passed since Freedom Air has acted on its pending applications, it

appears that Freedom Air no longer intends to prosecute such applications. If Freedom Air still

desires the authority requested in these applications, we direct the company to submit updated

fitness information in accordance with 14 CFR Part 204 within 14 days from the date of this

letter in the dockets identified above. If Freedom Air fails to submit such information that will

enable us to satisfactorily conclude its fitness to conduct its proposed operations, we intend to

dismiss the applications for failure to prosecute.
2

If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Vanessa Balgobin of my staff at

(202) 366-972 I.

Sincerely.

Laur ly J. Remo

Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division

cc: Dockets DOT-OST-2010-0l53 and DOT-OST-201O-0l90

.Mr. Richard P. Guillory

Honolulu Certificate Management Office.

Federal Aviation Administration
### Subpart D—Other Provisions

Sec.
5131.
Packaging distilled spirits for industrial uses.
5132.
Prohibited purchases by dealers.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subpart D, consisting of sections 5111 to 5117, related to wholesale dealers in liquors or beer, prior to repeal, except for sections 5114 and 5116, by Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11125(a)(1)(C), (c), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1953, 1957, effective July 1, 2008, but inapplicable to taxes imposed for periods before such date.

Another prior subpart D, consisting of sections 5111 to 5116, related to wholesale dealers, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

A prior subpart E, consisting of sections 5121 to 5125, related to retail dealers, prior to repeal, except for section 5124, by Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11125(a)(1)(D), (c), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1953, 1957, effective July 1, 2008, but inapplicable to taxes imposed for periods before such date.

Another prior subpart E, consisting of sections 5121 to 5124, related to retail dealers, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

A prior subpart F was redesignated subpart B of this part.

Another prior subpart F, consisting of sections 5131 to 5134, related to nonbeverage domestic drawback claimants, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

A prior subpart G, consisting of sections 5141 to 5149, related to general provisions, prior to repeal, except for sections 5142, 5143, 5145, and 5146, by Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11125(a)(1)(E), (c), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1953, 1957, effective July 1, 2008, but inapplicable to taxes imposed for periods before such date.

Another prior subpart G, consisting of sections 5141 to 5149, related to general provisions, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

#### Amendments

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11125(b)(10), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1955, added subpart heading and items 5131 and 5132.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Arctic Research Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Garrett W. Brass, Executive Director, Arctic Research Commission, (703) 525-0111 or TDD (703) 306-0090.

Garrett W. Brass,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 04-22037 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 249I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 249I |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6329 ta' Lulju 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 249I

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6329 ta' Lulju 2020

---

| Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informazzjoni |
| | INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA |
| | il–Kunsill |
| 2020/C 249 I/01 | Adozzjoni ta’ emendi għar-Regoli ta’ Proċedura tal-Eurojust | 1 |

Werrej

Paġna

IV   Informazzjoni

INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA

il–Kunsill

2020/C 249 I/01

Adozzjoni ta’ emendi għar-Regoli ta’ Proċedura tal-Eurojust

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

IV Informazzjoni

INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA

il–Kunsill

| 29.7.2020 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CI 249/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2020

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CI 249/1

---

Adozzjoni ta’ emendi għar-Regoli ta’ Proċedura tal-Eurojust

(2020/C 249 I/01)

Il-Kulleġġ tal-Eurojust adotta fl-24 ta’ Lulju 2020 emendi għar-Regoli ta’ Proċedura tal-Eurojust (1). Dawk l-emendi huma mehmuża mad-Deċiżjoni ta’ Implimentazzjoni tal-Kunsill (UE) 2020/1114 tat-23 ta’ Lulju 2020 (2).

Għall-Kulleġġ tal-Eurojust,

Ladislav HAMRAN

President tal-Eurojust

---

(1)  Approvati mill-Kunsill permezz tad-Deċiżjoni ta’ Implimentazzjoni (UE) 2019/2250 tad-19 ta’ Diċembru 2019 (ĠU L 336, 30.12.2019, p. 309) u adottati mill-Kulleġġ fl-20 ta’ Diċembru 2019 (ĠU L 50, 24.2.2020, p. 1).

1

(2)  ĠU L 244, 29.7.2020, p. 13.

2

---
#### Annie Melowsky, Appellant, v. David Cohen, Respondent.

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings county reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiff was not estopped by the testimony of Lena Ginsberg from proving that defendant, rather than his wife, struck plaintiff with the chair. It is also noted that a verdict should not be directed pending the progress of plaintiff’s case. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2204

In Re: STANLEY JAMES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Debtor. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JAMES KING, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BRIAN A. GOLDMAN, Trustee, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-05- 1726-AMD) Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 25, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James King, Appellant Pro Se. Carl Steven Silverman, GOLDMAN & GOLDMAN, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James King appeals from the district court’s order dismissing the appeal filed by King on behalf of Stanley James Development Corporation. The notice of appeal to this court was signed only by King, who is not an attorney. It is well settled that a corporation cannot appear in federal court except through its attorney. Rowland v. California Men’s Colony , 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrance J. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-20169.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Us Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Larry Chris lies, Rockport, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*323PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Terrance J. Williams has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Williams received a copy of counsel’s motion but filed no response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.