alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5402. Definitions

#### (a) Brewery

The brewery shall consist of the land and buildings described in the brewer's notice. The continuity of the brewery must be unbroken except where separated by public passageways, streets, highways, waterways, or carrier rights-of-way, or partitions; and if parts of the brewery are so separated they must abut on the dividing medium and be adjacent to each other. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, facilities under the control of the brewer for case packing, loading, or storing which are located within reasonable proximity to the brewery packaging facilities may be approved by the Secretary as a part of the brewery if the revenue will not be jeopardized thereby.

#### (b) Brewer

**For definition of brewer, see section 5052(d).**

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1389; amended Pub. L. 91–673, §3(b), Jan. 12, 1971, 84 Stat. 2057; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11125(b)(17), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1956.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5402, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 674, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

2005—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–59 substituted "section 5052(d)" for "section 5092".

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

1971—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–673 inserted proviso to definition of "Brewery" that the continuity of the brewery must be unbroken except where separated by public passageways, streets, highways, waterways, or carrier rights-of-way, or partitions, with the exception that the Secretary approve facilities under the control of the brewer for case packing, loading, or storing, which are located within reasonable proximity to the brewery as a part of the brewery if the revenue will not be jeopardized thereby.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–59 effective July 1, 2008, but inapplicable to taxes imposed for periods before such date, see section 11125(c) of Pub. L. 109–59, set out as a note under section 5002 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1971 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–673 effective on first day of first calendar month which begins more than 90 days after Jan. 12, 1971, see section 5 of Pub. L. 91–673, set out as a note under section 5056 of this title.
§ 3823.1 Prospecting within National Forest Wilderness for the purpose of gathering information about mineral resources. ( a ) The provisions of the Wilderness Act do not prevent any activity, including prospecting, within National Forest Wilderness for the purpose of gathering information about mineral or other resources if such activity is conducted in a manner compatible with the preservation of the wilderness environment. While information gathered by prospecting concerning mineral resources within National Forest Wilderness may be utilized in connection with the location of valuable mineral deposits which may be discovered through such activity and which may be open to such location, attention is directed to the fact that no claim may be located after midnight, December 31, 1983, and no valid discovery may be made after that time on any location purportedly made before that time.
( b ) All persons wishing to carry on any activity, including prospecting, for the purpose of gathering information about mineral or other resources on lands within National Forest Wilderness should make inquiry of the officer in charge of the National Forest in which the lands are located concerning the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture governing surface use of the lands for such activity.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**LEV
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas
      Beck ,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
      adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1)
          The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
      the
      Company.


Date: March
              14,
              2008
            By:
            /s/
                Douglas BeckDouglas
                Beck
              Chief
                Financial Officer




*This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
      date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
      retained by Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
#### Robert B. Kellogg, Respondent, v. Val M. Schmitz, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. So opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                393
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         345
<ALLOWANCES>                                           61
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      906
<PP&E>                                                574
<DEPRECIATION>                                        427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               7,857
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                         3,924
<COMMON>                                           10,427
<OTHER-SE>                                        (21,155)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        1,053
<SALES>                                               294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      294
<CGS>                                                 526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       1,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1,396)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1,396)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1,396)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.44)



</TABLE>
§ 4.314 Exhaustion of administrative remedies. ( a ) No decision of an administrative law judge, Indian probate judge, or BIA official that at the time of its rendition is subject to appeal to the Board, will be considered final so as to constitute agency action subject to judicial review under 5 U.S.C. 704, unless it has been made effective pending a decision on appeal by order of the Board.
( b ) No further appeal will lie within the Department from a decision of the Board.
( c ) The filing of a petition for reconsideration is not required to exhaust administrative remedies.
#### § 4100.0-9 Information collection.

The information collection requirements contained in Group 4100 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* The information is collected to enable the authorized officer to determine whether to approve an application to utilize public lands for grazing or other purposes.

[71 FR 39503, July 12, 2006]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case Number: 20-22234-CIV-MARTINEZ-BECERRA

LINCO ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

OLEG FIRER, EZ CAPITAL FUND, LLC, 

STAR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, and 

STAR EQUITIES, LLC,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

OLEG FIRER, EZ CAPITAL FUND, LLC, 

STAR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, and 

STAR EQUITIES, LLC,

Counter-Plaintiffs,

vs.

LINCO ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Counter-Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b) and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the 

Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned cause is referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge JACQUELINE BECERRA to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with 

respect to:

All matters relating to Plaintiff’s Motion for Order that Strikes Certain Affirmative 

Case 1:20-cv-22234-JEM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

Defenses or Deems Them to be Denials, [ECF No. 62].

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that it is the responsibility of the parties in this case to 

indicate the name of the Magistrate Judge on all motions and related papers referred by this order 

in the case number caption (CASE NO.: 20-22234-CIV-MARTINEZ-BECERRA).

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 10th day of June, 2021.

____________________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to:

Magistrate Judge Becerra

All Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-22234-JEM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2021 Page 2 of 2
#### § 4100.0-1 Purpose.

The purpose is to provide uniform guidance for administration of grazing on the public lands exclusive of Alaska.

[49 FR 6449, Feb. 21, 1984]
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In  connection  with the Annual Report of Molichem  Medicines,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Gilles  Cloutier,  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

            (1)   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/S/ GILLES CLOUTIER
-----------------------------------------------
Name:  Gilles Cloutier
Title:    Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Date:    May 19, 2003
#### § 4120.3-4 Standards, design and stipulations.

Range improvement permits and cooperative range improvement agreements shall specify the standards, design, construction and maintenance criteria for the range improvements and other additional conditions and stipulations or modifications deemed necessary by the authorized officer.

[49 FR 6452, Feb. 21, 1984, as amended at 61 FR 4227, Feb. 5, 1996]
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Terax Energy, Inc.
  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the six month period ending June 30, 2005,
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), I, Lawrence Finn, Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
  the Company.

A
  signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
  to Terax Energy, Inc. and will be retained by Terax Energy, Inc. and furnished
  to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Lawrence J. Finn
  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) 
  and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: August 2, 2006

---
§ 429.13 How long will the application review process take? ( a ) Reclamation will acknowledge in writing your completed and signed application and application fee within 30 calendar days of receipt. Reclamation may request additional information needed to process your application, such as legal land descriptions and detailed construction specifications.
( b ) The processing time depends upon the complexity of your requested use, issues associated with it, and the need for additional information from you.
( c ) Should your requested use be denied at any time during the review process, Reclamation will notify you in writing of the basis for the denial.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
        This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from
        Grandeur Inc. November 30, 1998 consolidated financial statements and is
        qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                0000894498
<NAME>                               Grandeur Inc.

<CURRENCY>                           Canadian dollars

       

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         NOV-30-1998

<EXCHANGE-RATE>               .65210

<CASH>                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 638,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              664,165
<PP&E>                                        318,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                (117,511)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                865,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,352,354
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      19,715
<OTHER-SE>                                    (1,506,623)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  865,446
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              664,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            8,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (664,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (664,416)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (664,416)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.05)
        


</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Matthew Carson, Chief Financial Officer of TouchTunes Music Corporation ("the
Company"), have reviewed the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and based on the inquiries I have
made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that for
the periods covered by the Report:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Matthew Carson
-----------------------
Matthew Carson
Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2004

THIS CERTIFICATE IS BEING MADE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE BY THE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF THE COMPANY WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 906, AND
SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A PART OF THE REPORT OR FILED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE.

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.











                                       27
#### § 3862.2-1 Citizenship of corporations and of associations acting through agents.

The proof necessary to establish the citizenship of applicants for mining patents must be made in the following manner: In case of an incorporated company, a certified copy of its charter or certificate of incorporation must be filed. In case of an association of persons unincorporated, the statement of their duly authorized agent, made upon his own knowledge or upon information and belief, setting forth the residence of each person forming such association, must be submitted. This statement must be accompanied by a power of attorney from the parties forming such association, authorizing the person who makes the citizenship showing to act for them in the matter of their application of patent.
#### Jasper, Lynch & Fishel, Inc., et al., v. Frieda Fingerhood et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### §903d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–197, §6, Dec. 22, 1973, 87 Stat. 772, which related to transfer of assets of Menominee Enterprises, Inc., to the United States and holding of land in trust for the tribe as their reservation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 4.1267 Appeals. ( a ) Any party desiring to appeal a decision of an administrative law judge granting temporary relief may appeal to the Board.
( b ) Any party desiring to appeal a decision of an administrative law judge denying temporary relief may appeal to the Board or, in the alternative, may seek judicial review pursuant to section 526(a) of the act.
( c ) The Board shall issue an expedited briefing schedule and shall issue a decision on the appeal expeditiously.
[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 45 FR 50753, July 31, 1980]
#### Lee Robert WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. STEWART, Columbus Correctional Institution; Unnamed Nurse and Doctor Assistants at Columbus Correctional Institute; Lieutenant Colman, Columbus Correctional Insti*168tute; Ms. Hunt, Superintendent at Columbus Correctional Institute; Unnamed Director of North Carolina Inmate Medical Records; Charles Bullock, Member of the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board; Lucien Copone, III, Member of the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board; Francis L. Dyer, Member of the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board; James C. Johnson, Member of the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board; Hildagene Reid, Member of the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-7443.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2006.

Decided Feb. 28, 2006.

Lee Robert Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Lee Robert Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000) because it was filed beyond the applicable statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Williams v. Stewart,*No. CA-04-567 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*