alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Neoware Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith
D. Schneck, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

     (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
         Report.




/s/ KEITH D. SCHNECK
--------------------
Keith D. Schneck
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 13, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0856 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM093AD

777 -25 - 0362 IN 02 --- 8/14/12 767 -25 - 0381 --- 8/19/10 747 -25 - 3381 IN 01 --- 10/19/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT**  **:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
§ 4110.3-2 Decreasing active use. ( a ) The authorized officer may suspend active use in whole or in part on a temporary basis due to reasons specified in § 4110.3-3(b)(1), or to facilitate installation, maintenance, or modification of range improvements.
( b ) When monitoring or documented field observations show grazing use or patterns of use are not consistent with the provisions of subpart 4180 of this part, or grazing use is otherwise causing an unacceptable level or pattern of utilization, or when use exceeds the livestock carrying capacity as determined through monitoring, ecological site inventory, or other acceptable methods, the authorized officer will reduce active use, otherwise modify management practices, or both. To implement reductions under this paragraph, BLM will suspend active use.
[71 FR 39504, July 12, 2006]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     Micro-Economics, Inc. June 30, 1999 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894552
<NAME>                        MICRO-ECONOMICS, INC.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    666
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              (1,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .00



</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Commerce Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glen Shipley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Glen ShipleyGlen ShipleyChief Financial OfficerDate: June 8, 2005
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4937 

To prohibit the United States Government from recognizing the Russian 

Federation’s claim of sovereignty over any portion of the sovereign territory of Ukraine, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. KAINE, Mr. 

PORTMAN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. GRAHAM, 

Mr. CARDIN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. COONS, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. 

CASEY, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. KING, Ms. ERNST, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. 

BOOKER, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. MERKLEY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. REED, Mr. MARKEY, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. 

HICKENLOOPER, Mr. WARNOCK, and Mr. PADILLA) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit the United States Government from recognizing 

the Russian Federation’s claim of sovereignty over any 

portion of the sovereign territory of Ukraine, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Non-Recognition of 

5 Russian Annexation of Ukrainian Territory Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4937 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST UNITED STATES RECOGNI2 TION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION’S CLAIM 

3 OF SOVEREIGNTY OVER ANY PORTION OF 

4 UKRAINE. 

5 (a) STATEMENT OF POLICY.—It is the policy of the 

6 United States not to recognize the Russian Federation’s 

7 claim of sovereignty over any portion of the internationally 

8 recognized territory of Ukraine, including its airspace and 

9 its territorial waters. 

10 (b) PROHIBITION.—In accordance with subsection 

11 (a), no Federal department or agency may take any action 

12 or extend any assistance that implies recognition of the 

13 Russian Federation’s claim of sovereignty over any portion 

14 of the internationally recognized territory of Ukraine, in15 cluding its airspace and its territorial waters. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 3838.3 What rules must I follow to explore for minerals and locate mining claims on SRHA lands? ( a ) The regulations in this part describe how to notify the surface owner before exploring for minerals or locating a mining claim on the mineral estate of SRHA lands.
( b ) If you own the surface estate of SRHA lands and want to explore for minerals or locate a mining claim on the Federally-reserved mineral estate, you do not need to follow the requirements in this part, but you must follow the requirements in parts 3832, 3833, 3834 and 3835 of this chapter.
#### § 4120.5 Cooperation.
Exhibit 4.375

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 176466 dated November 01, 2018

 

For Rendering

 

Telecommunication services for Cable Broadcasting

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

Mobile Trend (Zelenaya Tochka Group)

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1082635008939

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

2634081081

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

121 r., 217, Gagarina str., Nevinnomyssk, Stavropol region, 357106

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until November 01, 2023.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated August 28, 2019 No. 516-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:
  MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS 
   COMMUNICATIONS 
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION 
   IN THE SPHERE 
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION 
   TECHNOLOGY 
   AND MASS MEDIA
   PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 113579
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Indigenous Knowledge and Traditional Ecological Knowledge





Contact Us
  Forming a Relationship with Mother Earth ***Welcome!***  This site is a collaboratively developed repository of information for anyone working with the earth and its inhabitants. While hosted by the National Park Service, this site is a service for all those interested in Indigenous Knowledge (IK) or Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK).  **Please use the menu bar, site index, search function, or click on the photos on this page to navigate to content-rich pages.**
  Tribal members share information on the prairie.News, Conferences and Opportunities Tribal members share information on the prairie.
 Last updated: June 29, 2023
 Traditional Ecological Knowledge
 How Can I Learn More?
How Can I Learn More?
 Learning and Living TEK
Learning and Living TEK
 Guest Columnists
Guest Columnists
 Policies, Processes and Protocols
Tribal Policies, Processes and Protocols
 Tools Site Index
Contact Us


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
§ 5040.2 What will BLM do before it establishes sustained-yield forest units? Before BLM designates sustained-yield forest units, it will: ( a ) Hold a public hearing in the area where it proposes to designate the units. BLM will provide notice, approved by the BLM Director, to the public of any hearing concerning sustained-yield forest units. This notice must be published once a week for four consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties in which the forest units are situated. BLM may also publish the notice in a trade publication; and
( b ) Forward the minutes or meeting records to the BLM Director, along with an appropriate recommendation concerning the establishment of the units.
§ 2866.30 What are the rents for Communications Uses? ( a ) *Rent schedule.* You may obtain a copy of the current schedule from any BLM state, district, or field office, or by writing: Attention to the Division of Lands, Realty and Cadastral Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C St. NW, Mail Stop 2134LM, Washington, DC 20240. The BLM also posts the current communications use rent schedule at *http://www.blm.gov .* ( 1 ) The BLM uses a rent schedule to calculate the rent for communications uses. The schedule is based on population strata (the population served), as depicted in the most recent version of the Ranally Metro Area (RMA) Population Ranking, and the type of communications use or uses for which the BLM normally grants communication site rights-of-way. These uses are listed as part of the definition of “communications uses rent schedule,” set out at § 2861.5.
( 2 ) The BLM will update the schedule annually based on the U.S. Department of Labor Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, U.S. City Average (CPI-U), as of July of each year (difference in CPI-U from July of one year to July of the following year), and the RMA population rankings.
( 3 ) The BLM will limit the annual adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index to no more than 5 percent. The BLM will review the rent schedule to ensure that the schedule reflects fair market value.
( b ) *Uses not covered by the schedule.* The communications uses rent schedule does not apply to: ( 1 ) Communications uses located entirely within the boundaries of an oil and gas lease, and solely supporting the operations of the oil and gas lease (see parts 3160 through 3190 of this Chapter);
( 2 ) Communications facilities and uses ancillary to a linear authorization that are entirely within the scope of an authorized linear right-of-way, such as a railroad authorization or an oil and gas pipeline authorization, that solely support the operations authorized by that right-of-way and that are owned and operated by the authorization holder for that right-of-way;
( 3 ) Linear communications uses not listed on the schedule, such as telephone lines, fiber optic cables, and new technologies;
( 4 ) Grants for which the BLM determines the rent by competitive bidding; or
( 5 ) Communication facilities and uses for which a BLM State Director concurs that: ( i ) The expected annual rent, that the BLM estimates from market data, exceeds the rent from the rent schedule by at least five times; or
( ii ) The communication site serves a population of one million or more and the expected annual rent for the communications use or uses is more than $10,000 above the rent from the rent schedule.
### **Subchapter B—Application of Withholding Provisions**

Sec.
1461.
Liability for withheld tax.
1462.
Withheld tax as credit to recipient of income.
1463.
Tax paid by recipient of income.
1464.
Refunds and credits with respect to withheld tax.
[1465.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter B, consisting of section 1451, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 359; Oct. 4, 1976, Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), 90 Stat. 1834, related to tax-free covenant bonds, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §474(r)(29)(A), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 844, which repeal was not applicable with respect to obligations issued before Jan. 1, 1984, pursuant to section 475(b) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as an Effective Date of 1984 Amendment note under section 33 of this title.

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1899A(73), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2963, substituted "Liability for withheld tax" for "Return and payment of withheld tax" in item 1461.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §474(r)(29)(A), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 844, redesignated subchapter C as B, and struck out former subchapter B which related to tax-free covenant bonds.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(b)(41), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1803, struck out item 1465 "Definition of withholding agent".
§ 3809.312 When may I begin operations after filing a complete notice? ( a ) If BLM does not take any of the actions described in § 3908.313, you may begin operations no sooner than 15 calendar days after the appropriate BLM office receives your complete notice. BLM may send you an acknowledgement that indicates the date we received your notice. If you don't receive an acknowledgement or have any doubt about the date we received your notice, contact the office to which you sent the notice. This subpart does not require BLM to approve your notice or inform you that your notice is complete.
( b ) If BLM completes our review sooner than 15 calendar days after receiving your complete notice, we may notify you that you may begin operations.
( c ) You must provide to BLM a financial guarantee that meets the requirements of this subpart before beginning operations.
( d ) Your operations may be subject to BLM approval under part 3710, subpart 3715, of this title relating to use or occupancy of unpatented mining claims.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

KENNETH DANIEL CHRESTENSEN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-30045

D.C. No. 9:12-cr-00014-DWM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 10, 2014** 

Before: PREGERSON, LEAVY, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth Daniel Chrestensen appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 168-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction

for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

FILED

MAR 13 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
affirm. 

Chrestensen contends that the district court erred by imposing a two-level

enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1). First, he argues that there was

insufficient evidence that he possessed the recovered firearms. Contrary to the

government’s contention, Chrestensen did not waive this issue. See United States

v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 733 (1993) (waiver is intentional relinquishment of a

known right). However, because Chrestensen did not raise this issue before the

district court, it is forfeited and we review for plain error. See United States v.

Gallegos-Galindo, 704 F.3d 1269, 1272 (9th Cir. 2013). The district court did not

plainly err because Chrestensen conceded that the recovered firearms were his.

Second, Chrestensen contends that the district court erred in imposing the

enhancement because the connection between the recovered firearms and his

offense is clearly improbable. We review a district court’s findings of fact for

clear error. See United States v. Lopez-Sandoval, 146 F.3d 712, 714 (9th Cir.

1998). The record reflects that Chrestensen had weapons in his residence during

the course of his participation in a drug conspiracy. Under these circumstances,

the district court did not clearly err in concluding that Chrestensen possessed

firearms in connection with his offense. See id. at 715-16.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-30045
CERTIFICATIONS





Exhibit
      31.1
            Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, David
Bakhshi, certify that:





1.            I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Latin American
Telecommunications Venture Company-LATVCO





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.            I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c)
presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5.            I
have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors
and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and





6.            I
have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.




Dated:
October 9, 2009





By: /s/
David Bakhshi


David
Bakhshi


Chief
Executive Officer
#### James Harley, Respondent, v. Hannah E. Plant, Executrix, etc., and William Gleichmann, Appellants.

Motion denied, without costs. Pres ent— Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ.