alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Testimony: EPA Public Hearings on the Clean Power Plan

Mary lauran Hall Washington, DC (202) 642- 6617

Iwas around 21 years old when Ifirst started making healthier decisions abouttransportation and physical activity.

Instead ofdrivingto the bus stop, Iwould take the extra time to walk. Instead oftakingthe bus, Iwould bike every once and a while. Now, I love being active outdoors in Washington, DC and the surrounding area. I love hiking in Rock Creek Park, running along the McMillan Reservoir, biking on the 15th Street protected bike lane. I've even biked all the wayfrom Pittsburgh down to DC
on the GreatAllegheny Passage and the C&O Canal- a beautiful route that showcases our region's character.

Isaid Iwas around 21 years old when I started makingthese healthier choices. Iwas also around 21 years old when Ifirst experienced what it's like to be unable to breathe.

When I'm on the verge ofan asthma attack, itfeels like there's valve that's aboutto close in mywindpipe. It usually happens when I'm on a run or on a bike ride, consistent with the "exerciseinduced asthma" diagnosisthat my doctor explained to me. It starts withjust atickle in mythroat, almost as if I could get rid of it if Ijust drinksome water. Butthen it gets worse. The valve snaps shut and I'm left alternating between coughing and gasping, unable totake afull breath ofair into my lungs for up to twenty minutes. It'sterrifying.When I choose to walk and bike fortransportation, I do so because itgives me more energy, helps me maintain a healthy weight, and saves me money. It's supposed to be a healthy choice, one that helps my metabolism and boosts my cardiovascular health.

But when I breathe heavilyfrom outdoor exercise, I'm also breathing in dangerous pollution particles that are fueling my asthma and poisoning my lungs. I love living in Washington, DC, but I don't love that every breath Itake includes particles that are damaging to my lung health. I don't love thatthe American Lung Association ranked Washington, DC as the gth most polluted city for ozone in 2014.

There are hundreds ofthousands of people like me, who experience adult onset asthma thanks in partto dangerous pollutants in our atmosphere. It's even scarierto think about all the children who develop asthma at ayoung age due to air pollution. The consequences are even worse foryoung kids, elderly Americans, people with chronic diseases, and people who live closer to major highway arterials and polluting power plants than I do.

We need to do all we can to stop preventable lung diseases like mine. The Clean Power Plan will help protect public health by limitingthe carbon pollution that makes our air dangerous to breathe. I urge the Environmental Protection Agency to set afinal plan within ayearthat provides the strongest limits on carbon pollution. Anything less is unacceptable for our nation's health and forthe health ofour children.

Thank you.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jorge Tomas Pina

- Salazar , Appellant

No. 06

- 22

- 00022

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 21F0386

- 102 ). Memo randum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss

, Justice Stevens and Justice van Cleef participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opi nion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial c o urt’s judgment modify the judgment herein by striking the entire line that begins “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN

. ” As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Jorge Tomas Pina

- Salazar , has adequately indicated his

inab ility to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 12, 2022 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
§ 4.434 Conduct of hearing. ( a ) The administrative law judge may seek to obtain stipulations as to material facts.
( b ) Unless the administrative law judge directs otherwise: ( 1 ) The appellant will first present its evidence on the facts at issue; and
( 2 ) The other parties and the Bureau or Office will then present their evidence on such issues.
[75 FR 64668, Oct. 20, 2010]
# Fourth Court of A ppeals San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00421

- CR

Aaron POUCH

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court

, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B19622

- 1 Honorable M. Rex Emerson , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On July 12, 2022 , A ppellant filed notice s of appeal with this court

. On August 29, 2022

, court reporter Paula Beaver filed notice s of late reporter’s record s . The notice s state A ppellant
has not provided t he court reporter with written request s to prepare the reporter ’ s record s , se e T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(b )

.
T herefore, we order A ppellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of
the date of this order that (1) Appellant has delivered written request s to prepare the reporter’s
record s to court reporter Paula Beaver that designates the exhibits to be included

, see id. R. 34.6(b), and (2) either the reporter ’ s fee s have been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporte r ’ s fee s , or A ppellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter ’ s fee s , see id. R.
20.2

.
If A ppellant fails to respond within the time provided, A ppellant ’ s brief s will be due
within thirty days of the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in A ppellant ’ s brief s that do not require a reporter ’ s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the s aid

court on this 2nd day of September, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4580 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require a lactation space in 

each medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2022 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require a lactation 

space in each medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lactation Spaces for 

5 Veteran Moms Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LACTATION SPACES IN MEDICAL CENTERS OF THE 

7 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 17 of 

9 title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following new section: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4580 IS

1 ‘‘§ 1720K. Lactation spaces in medical centers of the 

2 Department 

3 ‘‘(a) LACTATION SPACE REQUIRED.—The Secretary 

4 shall ensure that each medical center of the Department 

5 contains a lactation space. 

6 ‘‘(b) NO UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY.—Nothing in this 

7 section shall be construed to authorize an individual to 

8 enter a medical center of the Department or portion there9 of that the individual is not otherwise authorized to enter. 

10 ‘‘(c) LACTATION SPACE DEFINED.—In this section, 

11 the term ‘lactation space’ means a hygienic place, other 

12 than a bathroom, that— 

13 ‘‘(1) is shielded from view; 

14 ‘‘(2) is free from intrusion; 

15 ‘‘(3) is accessible to disabled individuals (in16 cluding such individuals who use wheelchairs); 

17 ‘‘(4) contains a chair and a working surface; 

18 ‘‘(5) is easy to locate; 

19 ‘‘(6) is clearly identified with signage; and 

20 ‘‘(7) is available for use by women veterans and 

21 members of the public to express breast milk.’’. 

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

23 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

24 after the item related to section 1720J the following new 

25 item: 

‘‘1720K. Lactation spaces in medical centers of the Department.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4580 IS

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Secretary of Veterans 

2 Affairs shall carry out section 1720K of title 38, United 

3 States Code, as added by this section, not later than two 

4 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,278,028               1,470,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,884,165               2,755,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                   219,014                 168,710
<INVENTORY>                                  1,163,796               1,324,424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,410,377               5,646,345
<PP&E>                                       1,792,556               1,789,585
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,405,155               1,351,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,992,783               7,325,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,238,974               3,223,986
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         6,285                   6,285
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,747,524               4,095,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,992,783               7,325,897
<SALES>                                      2,639,515               2,179,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,639,515               2,179,293
<CGS>                                        2,028,903               1,770,903
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,028,903               1,770,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               980,124               1,367,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (21,410)                  14,960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (348,102)               (973,375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (348,102)               (973,375)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.06)                   (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)                   (.16)



</TABLE>
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–155 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3057, FOREIGN 

OPERATIONS, EXPORT FINANCING AND RELATED PROGRAMS APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2006 

JUNE 27, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 341] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 341, by a nonrecord vote, reports the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3057, the Foreign Operations, Export Financing and Related Programs Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2006, under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate equally divided and controlled by 

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Appropriations. The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. 

Under the rules of the House the bill shall be read for amendment by paragraph. The rule waives all points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI 

(prohibiting unauthorized appropriations or legislative provisions 

in an appropriations bill), except as specified in the resolution. The 

rule authorizes the Chair to accord priority in recognition to Members who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional 

Record. 

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

includes a waiver of clause 4(c) of rule XIII (requiring the threeday availability of printed hearings on a general appropriation bill). 

2 

The waiver of clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized appropriations or legislative provisions in an appropriations bill) is needed because there are numerous legislative provisions included in 

the bill. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each 

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with 

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 85 

Date: June 27, 2005. 

Measure: H.R. 3057, Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and 

Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2006. 

Motion by: Mr. Hastings of Florida. 

Summary of motion: To make in order and provide the appropriate waivers for the amendment offered by Mr. Edwards, which 

would provide an additional $1 billion in funding for veterans 

health. 

Results: Defeated 2 to 6. 

Vote by Members: Hastings (WA)—Nay; Capito—Nay; Cole— 

Nay; Bishop—Nay; Gingrey—Nay; McGovern—Yea; Hastings 

(FL)—Yea; Dreier—Nay. 

Æ
### PART IV—GENERAL

Sec.
5391.
Exemption from distilled spirits taxes.
5392.
Definitions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part IV consisted of sections 5391 and 5392 of this title, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

#### Amendments

**1979**—Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(b)(8), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 290, substituted "Exemption from distilled spirits taxes" for "Exemption from rectifying and spirits taxes" in item 5391.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60184-60185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Flight 93 National Memorial Advisory Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of October 22, 2004 Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the date of the October 22, 2004 
meeting of the Flight 93 Advisory Commission.

DATES: The public meeting will be held on October 22, 2004 from 10 a.m. 
to 4 p.m.

Location:  The meeting will be held at the Flight 93 National Memorial 
Office, 109 West Main Street, Newberry Building, Somerset, 
Pennsylvania, 15501.

Agenda

    The October 22, 2004 meeting will consist of:

(1) Opening of Meeting and Pledge of Allegiance
(2) Review and Approval of Minutes from July 30, 2004
(3) Reports from the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force Committees and the 
National Park Service

    Administration Committee
    Lands/Resource Assessment Committee

[[Page 60185]]

    Memorial Ideas Planning Committee
    Design Solicitation Committee
    Fundraising Committee
    Government Relations Committee
    Public Relations Committee
    Archives Committee
    Temporary Memorial Management Committee
    Family Memorial Committee
    Families of Flight 93, Inc.
    National Park Service

    Comments from the public will be received after each committee 
briefing.

(4) Old Business
(5) New Business
(6) Closing Remarks

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanne M. Hanley, Superintendent, 
Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The meeting will be open to the public. Any 
member of the public may file with the Commission a written statement 
concerning agenda items. The statement should be addressed to the 
Flight 93 Advisory Commission, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 
15501.

Joanne M. Hanley,
Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial.
[FR Doc. 04-22566 Filed 10-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-52-M
#### § 2812.4-2 Compensation payable by United States to permittee for use of road.

In the event the United States itself removes forest products over any road or right-of-way of the permittee or his successor in interest, the United States, if there has been no agreement under § 2812.3-7 covering the matter, shall pay to the permittee or his successor in interest reasonable compensation as determined by the State Director, who shall base his determination upon the same standards established by this paragraph for arbitrators in the determination of the compensation to be paid by a licensee to a permittee: *Provided, however,* That no bond or other security or liability insurance is to be required of the United States. When the United States constructs or improves a road on a permittee's land or right-of-way it shall pay to the permittee the full value at current stumpage prices of all timber of the permittee cut, removed, or destroyed in the construction or maintenance of such road or road improvements. Current stumpage prices shall be determined by the application of the standard appraisal formula, used in appraising O. and C. timber for sale, to the volume and grade of timber. Such volume and grade shall be determined by a cruise made by the permittee or, at his request, by the authorized officer. If either the permittee or the authorized officer does not accept the cruise made by the other, the volume and grade shall be determined by a person or persons acceptable both to the permittee and the State Director.
#### § 4.450-1 By whom private contest may be initiated.

Any person who claims title to or an interest in land adverse to any other person claiming title to or an interest in such land or who seeks to acquire a preference right pursuant to the Act of May 14, 1880, as amended (43 U.S.C. 185), or the Act of March 3, 1891 (43 U.S.C. 329), may initiate proceedings to have the claim of title or interest adverse to his claim invalidated for any reason not shown by the records of the Bureau of Land Management. Such a proceeding will constitute a private contest and will be governed by the regulations herein.
No. 14,777.

#### Monte Investment Company *v.*Derby.

(103 P. [2d] 1065)

Decided June 10, 1940.

Rehearing denied July 1, 1940.

*283Mr. Solomon Girsh, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. W. Penn Collins, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Chief Justice Hilliard

delivered the opinion of the court.

An unlawful detention action before a justice of the peace, on a complaint charging that “defendant entered into possession of the * * * premises without right or title.” Plaintiff had judgment for possession of the property involved and for costs.

Defendant, attempting to appeal to the county court, filed a bond conditioned that she would “prosecute her appeal with effect, and * * * pay whatever judgment may be rendered by the court upon dismissal or trial of said appeal.” Plaintiff, proceeding timely, moved to dismiss the appeal because defendant had “failed to comply with section 6388 of the 1921 Compiled Laws [’35 C.S.A., chapter 70, section 23] in that the additional bond for the use and occupation of the premises referred to therein has not been filed,” a premise not controverted. Defendant filed in the county court a “motion for judgment on the pleadings.” The court, ruling on both motions, dismissed the action “without prejudice.”

*284We think the court erred. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal, the record considered, should have been granted. Indeed, “if the appeal is not in conformity with the law, any order which the court may make in relation to it is void, except an order dismissing the appeal.” *Getty v. Miller,*10 Colo. App. 331, 51 Pac. 166. See, also, *Reardon v. Barr,*13 Colo. App. 385, 59 Pac. 216; *Erbaugh v. Fields,*77 Colo. 254, 235 Pac. 568; *Lamon v. Zamp,*82 Colo. 294, 259 Pac. 1041; *Smith v. Schreiber,*93 Colo. 497, 27 P. (2d) 491.

Defendant’s claim that the action was brought under ’35 C.S.A., chapter 70, section 4, subdivision fourth, a provision having to do with landlords and tenants and defaulted rentals, is patently untenable. Her contentions that there was no formal complaint filed in the justice court and no evidence given there, are contrary to the transcript of the record of that court. The sum of the situation is that defendant, suffering adverse judgment before the justice, possibly an erroneous judgment, failed to take the required steps to perfect an appeal to the county court. In such circumstances that court was powerless to entertain the appeal. *Erbaugh v. Fields, supra.*

Let the judgment be reversed, the trial court to enter an order sustaining plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

Mr. Justice Young and Mr. Justice Knous concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the 

Southern District of Florida 

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE

Company et al. 

Plaintiff

vs. CASE NO. 1:20-CV-22044 JEM

Jose Estevez et al. 

Defendant /

SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY

COMES NOW, the Defendant, Jose Estevez by and through his undersigned counsel 

files this suggestion of bankruptcy and states: 

1. Jose Estevez filed a Petition for relief under Chapter 13, Title 11, United 

States Code, in the US Bankruptcy Code, in the United States Bankruptcy 

Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, which bears the 

case number 20-16265-AJC This debt was specifically listed as a secured 

debt under Schedule F of the US Bankruptcy Petition. 

2. Relief was ordered June 9, 2020. 

3. Notice to the Plaintiff was mailed out upon receipt of service in the above 

referenced case. 

4. The right to a discharge has not been determined by the Bankruptcy Court 

nor has a discharge been denied or waived.

5. This action is founded on a claim for which a discharge would be a release or 

that seeks to impose a charge on property of the estate. 

Case 1:20-cv-22044-JEM Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2020 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, the Defendant’s suggest that this action has been stayed by the 

operation of 11 U.S.C § 362. 

 

/s/ Teresa M. Alvarez, Esq.

FBN 973677

Attorney for Debtor in Bankruptcy

TERESA MARIA ALVAREZ, P.A.

2525 Ponce de León Boulevard

Suite 300

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

TEL 305-667-3040

assistant@teresaalvarezpa.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via e 

portal to Lindsey Ryan Trowell, Esq, Lead Attorney Smith Gambrell Russell via ecf 

ltrowell@sgrlaw.com.; John Patrick Marin, Esq. Smith Gambrell Russell via ecf 

jmarino@sgrlaw.com; Kristen Wenger Bracken, Esq. Lead Attorney Smith Gambrell 

Russell via ecf ; kbracken@sgrlaw.com and Yonatan Bernstein, Esq. PRO HAC VICE

, Rivkin Radler via ecf yonatan.bernstein@rivkin.com on this 28th day of July, 2020.

 /s/ Teresa Alvarez, Esq.

Case 1:20-cv-22044-JEM Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2020 Page 2 of 2