alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Spill Response





Contact Us
  What We Do
 The primary function of the NPS Spill Response Program is assist parks in preparing for and responding to chemical and oil spills that do affect or may affect park natural or cultural resources and/or facilities managed by the NPS. There are three stages when dealing with an oil spill: preparation, active response, and restoring the land and resources after the spill.
 Apostle Island, Outer Island SandspitPrepare Learn how parks prepare for hazardous spills.
 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Dunbar Beach NPS/K.GeorgeRespond What happens during the active response stage of a spill?
 NPS Photo/Gregg Bruff Twelvemile Beach at Au Sable Point at Pictured RocksRestore Read about the restoration efforts that follow a spill response.
 Embed Embed Video
 
 Close Copy
 Visit our keyboard shortcuts docs for details Duration:5 minutes, 42 seconds Watch this video to learn more about how science is used to protect natural resources, especially after an oil spill.
 Last updated: August 29, 2017
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
§ 4300.80 How can I get a permit to cross reindeer over public lands? ( a ) BLM may issue a crossing permit free of charge when you file an application with BLM at least 30 days before the crossing is to begin. Lands crossed may include lands under a grazing permit.
( b ) The application does not have to be on a BLM-approved form nor in a particular format, but it must show: ( 1 ) The number of reindeer to be driven;
( 2 ) The start date;
( 3 ) The approximate period of time required for the crossing; and
( 4 ) The land to be crossed.
( c ) You must comply with applicable State and Federal laws on livestock quarantine and sanitation when crossing reindeer on public land.
§ 46.305 Public involvement in the environmental assessment process. ( a ) The bureau must, to the extent practicable, provide for public notification and public involvement when an environmental assessment is being prepared. However, the methods for providing public notification and opportunities for public involvement are at the discretion of the Responsible Official. ( 1 ) The bureau must consider comments that are timely received, whether specifically solicited or not.
( 2 ) Although scoping is not required, the bureau may apply a scoping process to an environmental assessment.
( b ) Publication of a “draft” environmental assessment is not required. Bureaus may seek comments on an environmental assessment if they determine it to be appropriate, such as when the level of public interest or the uncertainty of effects warrants, and may revise environmental assessments based on comments received without need of initiating another comment period.
( c ) The bureau must notify the public of the availability of an environmental assessment and any associated finding of no significant impact once they have been completed. Comments on a finding of no significant impact do not need to be solicited, except as required by 40 CFR 1501.4(e)(2).
( d ) Bureaus may allow cooperating agencies (as defined in § 46.225) to participate in developing environmental assessments.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LSB Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul A. Miller, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as added by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 25, 2004/s/ Paul A. MillerPaul A. Miller
President and
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 4720.2-2 Removal of excess animals from private lands.

If the authorized officer determines that proper management requires the removal of wild horses and burros from areas that include private lands, the authorized officer shall obtain the written consent of the private owner before entering such lands. Flying aircraft over lands does not constitute entry.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     Micro-Economics, Inc. June 30, 1998 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894552
<NAME>                        MICRO-ECONOMICS, INC.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    666
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              (1,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .00



</TABLE>
M&I 2011 Sch B-3B F.Z15.xlsm

9/24/2012

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF M&I VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS TO BE APPLIED IN FY 2012 ACCOUNTING

(REFLECTED IN 2013 DEFICIT/CAPITAL RATES)

A B C D EF

Voluntary Voluntary Payments

Date Payments Deficit to Capital 

Facility/Contractor Received Applied to in FY 2012 Sch A-6 to Sch A-2B T

ref (

Folsom D&R

City of Roseville 09/07/2012 Capital $ 205,504.00 205,504.00 $ 20

City of Roseville 09/07/2012 FY 2011 $ 5,178.49 5,178.49 $ 

Friant-Kern Canal

City of Lindsay 2/24/2012 PY Deficit 844.63 844.63 $ 

San Felipe Unit

San Benito County WD 07/2/2012 PY Deficit $ 34,501.11 $ 34,501.11 $ - $ 3

San Luis Canal - Tracy

San Luis WD 02/14/2012 PY Deficit $ 47,564.61 $ 47,564.61 $ - $ 4

Total $ 293,592.84 $ 88,088.84 $ 205,504.00 $ 29
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-22051-CIV-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 3G

LICENSING S.A., AND SISVEL S.p.A., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HMD AMERICAN, INC. and

HMD GLOBAL OY, 

Defendants. 

______________________________________/ 

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants HMD America, Inc. and HMD 

Global Oy’s (“Defendants”) Notice of Hearing [D.E. 39]. This matter was referred to the 

undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 by the Honorable Darrin P. Gayles, United States District

Judge [D.E. 35]. 

The undersigned held a hearing on this matter on December 15, 2020. In accordance 

with the undersigned’s rulings at the hearing, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

 The dispute as to Interrogatory No. 11 has been resolved. 

 Plaintiffs Sisvel International S.A., 3G Licensing S.A., and Sisvel S.p.A.’s

(“Plaintiffs”) may answer Interrogatories Nos. 12 and 13 with respect to portfolios 

of patents that include the patent(s) at issue in this case; and may designate those 

answers as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” plus experts. 

 Defendants’ request for a better answer to Interrogatory No. 16 is denied without 

prejudice to the issue being addressed at the Plaintiffs’ Rule 30(b)(6) corporate 

representative’s deposition. 

Case 1:20-cv-22051-DPG Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

 Defendants’ Request for Production No. 21 is modified as follows: All documents 

that refer or relate to an inventor of an Asserted Patent, regarding the Asserted 

Patent. Plaintiffs shall respond to this request as modified. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 16th day of December, 

2020. 

____________________________________ 

ALICIA M. OTAZO-REYES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cc: United States District Judge Darrin P. Gayles

Counsel of Record 

Case 1:20-cv-22051-DPG Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 3435.0-3 Authority. ( a ) These regulations are issued under the authority of the statutes cited in § 3400.0-3 of this title.
( b ) These regulations primarily implement: ( 1 ) Section 3 of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended (30 U.S.C. 203);
( 2 ) Section 510(b)(5) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (30 U.S.C. 1260(b)(5));
( 3 ) Section 1 of the Act of October 30, 1978 (92 Stat. 2073);
( 4 ) Section 1 of the Act of October 19, 1980 (94 Stat. 2269); and
( 5 ) Section 4 of the Rattlesnake National Recreation Area and Wilderness Act of 1980 (94 Stat. 2272).
[44 FR 42628, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33144, July 30, 1982]
#### Lanham *v.*Henry *et al.*

Fish, C. J.

The granting clause of an instrument, made and executed as a warranty deed, was as follows: The grantor, for and in consideration of a stated sum of money, the receipt of which is acknowledged, “hath granted, bargained, sold, and conveyed, and doth by these presents grant, bargain, sell, and convey unto the said [grantee], his heirs and assigns, all the metallic ore and mineral interest of every description and all ore *430and mineral of every kind and quality that [is] on, in, or upon or may be found in or upon a certain” described lot or parcel of land, “with the exclusive right and privilege of entering upon the said premises at any time hereafter to dig and mine for ore and mineral of every description, including stone, wheresoever the same may be found, or wheresoever the said [grantee] may deem proper to excavate for the same, and to take out and remove, ship, sell, have, and dispose of all minerals and metallic ore of every description found in or upon the aforesaid described premises, with the right of ingress and egress to and from the mine in every direction, the water privilege for washing ore, and the right of erecting small houses for tjie accommodation of hands employed in working the mine, and also the right of removing the .said buildings or houses, and to have the right and privilege of purchasing the said premises at any time within twenty-five years from thé date hereof for the sum of six hundred dollars payable in cash on delivery of deed to same.” The habendum clause was as follows: “To have and to hold the aforesaid metallic ore and mineral interest with all the rights and privileges herein granted as aforesaid, unto him, the said [grantee], his heirs and assigns, together and singular the rights, members, and appurtenances thereof to the same belonging to his and their use, benefit, and behoof forever in fee simple.” *Meld,*that this instrument did not constitute a lease of the mineral interests in the land for the period of twenty-five years, nor a • mere option or right to purchase such interest, within that period, for the sum of six hundred dollars, payable in. cash; but it conveyed to the grantee the absolute title to all the minerals described in the land, together with the right to purchase all the remaining interest therein, at any time within twenty-five years from the date of the instrument, for such a cash consideration. Accordingly, the trial judge did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition; which is the only point referred to in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error.

November 19, 1910.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Fite. Bartow, superior court. November 6, 1909.

*Mundy & Mundy*and *John T. Norris,*for plaintiff in error.

*Paul F. Alcin*and *Neel & Peeples,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 4.809 Determination of parties. ( a ) The affected applicant or recipient to whom a notice of hearing or a notice of an opportunity for hearing has been mailed in accordance with part 17 of this title and § 4.815, and the Director, are the initial parties to the proceeding.
( b ) Other persons or organizations shall have the right to participate as parties if the final decision could directly and adversely affect them or the class they represent, and if they may contribute materially to the disposition of the proceedings.
( c ) A person or organization wishing to participate as a party under this section shall submit a petition to the administrative law judge within 15 days after the notice has been served. The petition should be filed with the administrative law judge and served on the affected applicant or recipient, on the Director, and on any other person or organization who has been made a party at the time of filing. Such petition shall concisely state: ( 1 ) Petitioner's interest in the proceeding,
( 2 ) how his participation as a party will contribute materially to the disposition of the proceeding,
( 3 ) who will appear for petitioner,
( 4 ) the issues on which petitioner wishes to participate, and
( 5 ) whether petitioner intends to present witnesses.
( d ) The administrative law judge shall promptly ascertain whether there are objections to the petition. He shall then determine whether petitioners have the requisite interest to be a party in the proceedings, as defined in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, and shall permit or deny participation accordingly. Where petitions to participate as parties are made by individuals or groups with common interests, the administrative law judge may request all such petitioners to designate a single representative, or he may recognize one or more of such petitioners to represent all such petitioners. The administrative law judge shall give each such petitioner written notice of the decision on his petition. If the petition is denied, he shall briefly state the grounds for denial and shall then treat the petition as a request for participation as amicus curiae. The administrative law judge shall give written notice to each party of each petition granted.
( e ) Persons or organizations whose petition for party participation is denied may appeal the decision to the Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, within 7 days of receipt of denial. The Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, will make the final decision for the Department to grant or deny the petition.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology and pegmatites of the Fourmile quadrangle, Black 
Hills, South Dakota

#### Professional Paper 297-D

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- Preceding Publications:
- Geology 
    of the Fourmile pegmatite area, Custer County, South Dakota (1955)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp297D 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:59
#### Rivers and Harbors Improvement Company, Respondent, v. Frank A. Barnaby, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott,Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 404.36 Will Reclamation reimburse me for the cost of an appraisal investigation or a feasibility study that was not completed under § 404.11(a) or (b)?

No. The cost-share provisions described in this rule only apply to appraisal investigations and feasibility studies that are completed under the program pursuant to § 404.11(a) or (b). Reclamation will not reimburse you or provide program funding for any expenses related to an appraisal investigation or a feasibility study that is completed without assistance from Reclamation.
#### § 4.1161 Who may file.

A permittee issued a notice or order by the Secretary pursuant to the provisions of section 521(a)(2) or section 521(a)(3) of the Act or any person having an interest which is or may be adversely affected by a notice or order subject to review under § 4.1160 may file an application for review with the Hearings Division, OHA.

[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 67 FR 4368, Jan. 30, 2002; 88 FR 5795, Jan. 30, 2023]
San Mateo, CA
                                                               January 18, 2000
                                                               $200,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000), with interest from the
date  hereof at a rate of ten percent  (10%) per annum,  which  amount  shall be
secured  by all of the  assets  of  Borrower.  Said  principal  shall be due and
payable on demand by  Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,  but in no
event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred eighty (180) days after
the date of this Note. This Note may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         2. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         3.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 18 day of January, 2000.

                                            Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                            By: __________________

                                            Title: ________________