alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

WATER SUPPLY

9th Floor, 401 Church Street 

Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1549 

ANNUAL DISPOSAL/INJECTION WELL MONITORING REPORT 

Name and Address of Facility Name and Address of Owner/Operator 

State County Permit Number

WELL ACTIVITY TYPE OF PERMIT LOCATION 

___ Brine Disposal ___ Individual Latitude 

___ Enhanced Recovery ___ Area 

___ Hydrocarbon Storage ___ Number of Wells 

 Longitude

Lease Name Well umber 

INJECTION PRESSURE TOTAL VOLUME INJECTED 

Month Year Average PSIG Maximum PSIG BBL MCF Minimum PSIG Maximum PSIG 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certification 

I certify under the penalty of law that I have examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this document and all

attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe that

the information is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,

including the possibility of fine or imprisonment. 

Name and Official Title (please type or print) Signature Date Signed 

TUBING—CASING ANNULUS 

PRESSURE (OPTIONAL 

MONITORING) 

CN-pending RDA pending
### **CHAPTER 13—TAX ON GENERATION-SKIPPING TRANSFERS**

Subchapter
Sec. 1
A.
Tax imposed
2601

B.
Generation-skipping transfers
2611
C.
Taxable amount
2621
D.
GST exemption
2631
E.
Applicable rate; inclusion ratio
2641
F.
Other definitions and special rules
2651
G.
Administration
2661

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XIV, §1431(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2717, struck out "CERTAIN" after "TAX ON" in chapter heading, substituted "Generation-skipping transfers" for "Definitions and special rules" in item for subchapter B and "Taxable amount" for "Administration" in item for subchapter C, and added items for subchapters D, E, and F.

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
# Making a Difference in the Lives of Infants and Toddlers and Their Families: The Impacts of Early Head Start Volume II: Final Technical Report Appendixes

Listen

Publication Date:

Current as of:April 29, 2019

##       Introduction  

Expand

This report is the culmination of more than six years’ work by a very large number of people. Overall, the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation project could not have been undertaken without the contributions and collaboration of many, many individuals and organizations. In this appendix we acknowledge the diverse contributions of so many. We have attempted to include those who have played a key role from the beginning of the project, whether or not they were still involved at the time this report was being prepared; without their contributions, this work would not have been possible.

##       Files  

                      - PDF     Making a Difference in the Lives of Infants and Toddlers and Their Families: The Impacts of Early Head Start Volume II: Final Te  (4,419.93 KB)

Types:

Report

OPRE Research Topics:

Head Start & Early Head Start

Projects:

Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project (EHSRE)

Topics:

Early ChildhoodEarly Head Start

Tags:

EducationGrantsPartnershipsResearch

##       Directly Related Research  

                        -  Early Head Start Children in Grade 5: Long-Term Followup of the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project Study Sample, Final Report                  December 15, 2010     
                        -  Making a Difference in the Lives of Infants and Toddlers and Their Families: The Impacts of Early Head Start, Executive Summary                  June 15, 2002     
                        -  Making a Difference in the Lives of Infants and Toddlers and Their Families: The Impacts of Early Head Start Volume I: Final Technical Report                  June 15, 2002
§ 3832.31 What is a mill site? A mill site is a location of nonmineral land not contiguous to a vein or lode that you can use for activities reasonably incident to mineral development on, or production from, the unpatented or patented lode or placer claim with which it is associated. ( a ) A dependent mill site is used for activities that support a particular patented or unpatented lode or placer mining claim or group of mining claims.
( b ) An independent or custom mill site— ( 1 ) Is not dependent on a particular mining claim but provides milling or reduction processing for nearby lode mines or a lode mining district;
( 2 ) Is used to mill, process, and reduce either— ( i ) Ores for other miners on a contractual basis; or
( ii ) Ores that are purchased by the independent or custom mill site owner.
( 3 ) You may not have a custom or independent mill site for processing materials from placer mining claims.
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21992-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2020 Page 14 of 14
### §6337. Redemption of property

#### (a) Before sale

Any person whose property has been levied upon shall have the right to pay the amount due, together with the expenses of the proceeding, if any, to the Secretary at any time prior to the sale thereof, and upon such payment the Secretary shall restore such property to him, and all further proceedings in connection with the levy on such property shall cease from the time of such payment.

#### (b) Redemption of real estate after sale

#### (1) Period

The owners of any real property sold as provided in section 6335, their heirs, executors, or administrators, or any person having any interest therein, or a lien thereon, or any person in their behalf, shall be permitted to redeem the property sold, or any particular tract of such property, at any time within 180 days after the sale thereof.

#### (2) Price

Such property or tract of property shall be permitted to be redeemed upon payment to the purchaser, or in case he cannot be found in the county in which the property to be redeemed is situated, then to the Secretary, for the use of the purchaser, his heirs, or assigns, the amount paid by such purchaser and interest thereon at the rate of 20 percent per annum.

#### (c) Record

When any lands sold are redeemed as provided in this section, the Secretary shall cause entry of the fact to be made upon the record mentioned in section 6340, and such entry shall be evidence of such redemption.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 787; Pub. L. 89–719, title I, §104(e), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1137; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §349A(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 639.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1982—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 97–248 substituted "180 days" for "120 days".

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

1966—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 89–719 substituted "120 days" for "1 year".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §349A(b), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 639, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply with respect to property sold after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 3, 1982]."

#### Effective Date of 1966 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 89–719 applicable after Nov. 2, 1966, regardless of when title or lien of United States arose or when lien or interest of another person was acquired, with certain exceptions, see section 114(a)–(c) of Pub. L. 89–719, set out as a note under section 6323 of this title.
§ 2653.11 Conveyance reservations. ( a ) Conveyances issued pursuant to this subpart are subject to the conveyance reservations described in § 2650.4 of this chapter.
( b ) In addition to the reservations provided in paragraph (a) of this section, conveyance for cemetery sites or historical places will contain a covenant running with the land providing that ( 1 ) the regional corporation shall not authorize mining or mineral activity of any type; nor shall it authorize any use which is incompatible with or is in derogation of the values of the area as a cemetery site or historical place (standards for determining uses which are incompatible with or in derogation of the values of the area are found in relevant portions of 36 CFR 800.9 (1974); and
( 2 ) that the United States reserves the right to seek enforcement of the covenant in an action in equity. The covenant placed in this subsection may be released by the Secretary, in his discretion, upon application of the regional corporation grantee showing that extraordinary to circumstances of a nature to warrant the release have arisen subsequent to the conveyance.
( c ) Conveyances for cemetery sites and historical places shall also contain the covenant required by § 2650.4-6 of this chapter.
[38 FR 14218, May 30, 1973. Redesignated and amended at 41 FR 14740, Apr. 7, 1976]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 23, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51259 Conference Calendar

BILL RUTHERFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-02-CV-311

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Bill Rutherford, Texas prisoner # 275320, has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his appeal of the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous under Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 487 (1994). He argues that: (1) the laws in effect at the time of the commission of his offense on July 30, 1977, govern the revocation of his parole for that offense; (2) his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action is basedNo. 02-51259 -2-

on Morrissey v. Brewer , 408 U.S. 471, 488 (1972) and is not frivolous; and (3) the retroactive application of laws enacted after the commission of his offense violated his constitutional rights. Rutherford does not argue that Heck is inapplicable or that the parole revocation proceeding that he is challenging has been reversed or invalidated. Because Rutherford does not provide any analysis of this issue, he therefore waives any appeal of it. See United States v. Reyes , 300 F.3d 555, 558 n.2 (5th Cir. 2002); American States Ins. Co. v. Bailey , 133 F.3d 363, 372 (5th Cir. 1998). Because Rutherford has not shown that the district court erred in certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, his motion to proceed IFP is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of his complaint and this court’s dismissal of this appeal as frivolous each count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Rutherford has received strikes in the following cases: Rutherford v. Board of Pardons and Paroles , No. 02-51262, Rutherford v. Disciplinary Case , No. 02-11050, Rutherford v. Board of Pardons and Paroles , No. 02-51266, Rutherford v. Board of Pardons and Paroles , No. 02-51260, Rutherford v. Board of Pardons and Paroles , No. 02-51268, and Rutherford v. Bell County Jail Administrator , No. 02-51261. Rutherford has now accumulated over three strikesNo. 02-51259 -3- under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
BAR IMPOSED.
§ 3861.4-1 Payment. ( a ) The claimant is required, in all cases, to make satisfactory arrangements with the surveyor for the payment for his services and those of his assistants in making the survey, as the United States will not be held responsible for the same.
( b ) The state director has no jurisdiction to settle differences relative to the payment of charges for field work, between mineral surveyors and claimants. These are matters of private contract and must be enforced in the ordinary manner, i.e., in the local courts. The Department has, however, authority to investigate charges affecting the official actions of mineral surveyors, and will, on sufficient cause shown, suspend or revoke their appointment.
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Reclamation Information Sharing Environment (RISE)
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Ratesetting
            - CVP Annual Ratebooks & Schedules
            - CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2024

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP)                  - About the CVP
                - Water Info Links
                - Ratesetting
                - Projects/Activities
                - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation          of the CVP and SWP
                - Laws/Regs/Links
                - Financial Information 
                - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
              - Programs & Activities
              - Projects & Facilities
              - Doing Business with Reclamation
              - Public Affairs 
              - Employment
              - Recreation
              - Site Index
              - Contact Us

## CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2024

*Note:  Documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) require Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher to view, download Adobe Acrobat Reader*
*Last Updated: 4/16/24*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

            - Contact Us
            - Site Index
            - Accessibility
            - Disclaimer
            - DOI
            - FOIA
            - No Fear Act
            - Notices
            - Privacy Policy
            - Quality of Information
            - USA.gov
            - Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–21 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII 

WITH RESPECT TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF 

CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 

COMMITTEE 

MARCH 16, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 163] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 163, by a nonrecord vote, reports the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule 

reported on the legislative day of March 17, 2005, providing for 

consideration of a bill relating to the rights of an incapacitated person or persons. 

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEquations of motion for a flexible spacecraft-lumped parameter idealizationThe equations of motion for a flexible vehicle capable of arbitrary translational and rotational motions in inertial space accompanied by small elastic deformations are derived in an unabridged form. The vehicle is idealized as consisting of a single rigid body with an ensemble of mass particles interconnected by massless elastic structure. The internal elastic restoring forces are quantified in terms of a stiffness matrix. A transformation and truncation of elastic degrees of freedom is made in the interest of numerical integration efficiency. Deformation dependent terms are partitioned into a hierarchy of significance. The final set of motion equations are brought to a fully assembled first order form suitable for direct digital implementation. A FORTRAN program implementing the equations is given and its salient features described.Document ID19910019897Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsStorch, Joel*(Draper (Charles Stark) Lab., Inc. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Gates, Stephen*(Draper (Charles Stark) Lab., Inc. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1982Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:188727NASA-CR-188727CSDL-R-1582Accession Number91N29211Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-16023Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910019897.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §5848. Restrictive use of information

#### (a) General rule

No information or evidence obtained from an application, registration, or records required to be submitted or retained by a natural person in order to comply with any provision of this chapter or regulations issued thereunder, shall, except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, be used, directly or indirectly, as evidence against that person in a criminal proceeding with respect to a violation of law occurring prior to or concurrently with the filing of the application or registration, or the compiling of the records containing the information or evidence.

#### (b) Furnishing false information

Subsection (a) of this section shall not preclude the use of any such information or evidence in a prosecution or other action under any applicable provision of law with respect to the furnishing of false information.

(Added Pub. L. 90–618, title II, §201, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1232.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5848, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 727, as amended by acts Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §203(f), 72 Stat. 1427; June 1, 1960, Pub. L. 86–478, §3, 74 Stat. 149, related to definition of a firearm, machine gun, rifle, shotgun, other weapon, importer, manufacturer, dealer, interstate commerce, transfer and person, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 90–618.
exhibit 32

 

**FORM OF SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the amended Annual Report of CareDecision Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Cox, President/CEO, of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Date: September 2, 2005

 

/s/ Robert Cox                   

Robert Cox

President/CEO

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

 

 

**FORM OF SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the amended Annual report of CareDecision Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith Berman, Treasurer/CFO, of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Date: September 2, 2005

 

/s/ Keith Berman                               

Keith Berman

Treasurer/CFO

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.