alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Jornal Oficial C 254A/14 d

| | ISSN 1725-2482 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 254A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 48.o ano14 de Outubro de 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2482

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 254A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

48.o ano14 de Outubro de 2005

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informações |
| | Conselho |
| 2005/C 254A/1 | Aviso de abertura de vagade chefe de equipa de oficiais de serviço – comunicador; oficial de serviço – comunicador — Ref. Conselho/B/023 e Conselho/B/024 | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

III   Informações

Conselho

2005/C 254A/1

Aviso de abertura de vagade chefe de equipa de oficiais de serviço – comunicador; oficial de serviço – comunicador — Ref. Conselho/B/023 e Conselho/B/024

1

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

III Informações

Conselho

| 14.10.2005 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 254/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2005

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 254/1

---

AVISO DE ABERTURA DE VAGA

CHEFE DE EQUIPA DE OFICIAIS DE SERVIÇO — COMUNICADOR

OFICIAL DE SERVIÇO — COMUNICADOR

Ref. Conselho/B/023 e Conselho/B/024

(2005/C 254 A/01)

O Secretariado‐Geral do Conselho da União Europeia pretende prover, temporariamente,

| — | um lugar de categoria B*, grau 7 (AST7) — Conselho/B/023 |
| --- | --- |

—

um lugar de categoria B*, grau 7 (AST7) — Conselho/B/023

| — | oito lugares de categoria B*, grau 5 (AST5) — Conselho/B/024 |
| --- | --- |

—

oito lugares de categoria B*, grau 5 (AST5) — Conselho/B/024

no SITCEN (Centro de Situação Conjunto da União Europeia), em Bruxelas. O SITCEN acompanha e avalia os acontecimentos internacionais durante 24 horas por dia, com particular destaque para as zonas sensíveis, o terrorismo e a proliferação de armas de destruição em massa e presta assessoria e apoio ao secretário‐geral/alto representante da União Europeia, aos representantes especiais e a outros altos funcionários da União Europeia, bem como às operações militares ou de gestão civil de crises conduzidas pela União Europeia.

Para mais informações, é favor dirigir‐se ao Serviço de Recrutamento através do seguinte endereço electrónico:

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

ou do sítio do referido serviço na internet, com o seguinte endereço:

http://ue.eu.int/concours

Prazo para a apresentação de candidaturas: 10 de Novembro de 2005, fazendo fé a data do carimbo dos correios.

---
Exhibit 13.1 CERT IFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Alberta Star Development Corp. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tim Coupland, Principal Executive and I, Gordon Steblin, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Tim CouplandTim Coupland, Principal Executive Officer May  16 , 2011   Gordon SteblinGordon Steblin, Principal Financial Officer May   16, 2011
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE01826
THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

STATEMENTOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF

THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, I, Thomas R. Moyes, certify that:

 

1.  TheAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) ofMediCor Ltd. (the “Company”), fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of MediCor.

 

Date: October 21, 2005

 
|   | /s/ Thomas R. Moyes |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas R. Moyes          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

----
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TouchTunes Music Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew
Carson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Matthew Carson
-------------------
Matthew Carson
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-22082-KMW

SAMUEL RIVERA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

VICTORIA R. BRENNAN, et al.

Defendants.

/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s report 

and recommendation (DE 10) (“Report”) regarding Plaintiff’s petition for writ of habeas 

corpus. In the Report, Judge Reid recommended that Plaintiff’s § 1983 complaint be 

construed as a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction as an unauthorized, successive petition. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report. 

(DE 11). Upon an independent review of the Report, the objections, the record, and 

applicable case law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The conclusions in the Report (DE 10) are AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. This action is DISMISSED.

3. No certificate of appealability shall issue. 

4. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 11th day of January,

2021.

Case 1:20-cv-22082-KMW Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/12/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

cc:

Samuel Rivera 

180695

South Florida Reception Center- South Unit

Inmate Mail / Parcels 

13910 NW 41st Street 

Doral, FL 33178

Case 1:20-cv-22082-KMW Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/12/2021 Page 2 of 2
#### § 668.810 What types of costs are allowable expenditures under the INA program?

Rules relating to allowable costs under WIA are covered in 20 CFR 667.200 through 667.220.
§ 4.1386 Petition for temporary relief from decision; appeals from decisions granting or denying temporary relief. ( a ) Any party may file a petition for temporary relief from the decision of OSM in conjunction with the filing of the request for review or at any time before an initial decision is issued by the administrative law judge.
( b ) The petition for temporary relief shall be filed with the administrative law judge to whom the request for review has been assigned. If none has been assigned, the petition shall be filed with the Hearings Division, Office of Hearings and Appeals, U.S. Department of the Interior.
( c ) The petition for temporary relief shall include: ( 1 ) A statement of the specific relief requested:
( 2 ) A detailed statement of why temporary relief should be granted, including: ( i ) A showing that there is a substantial likelihood that petitioner will prevail on the merits, and
( ii ) A showing that granting the relief requested will not adversely affect the public health or safety or cause significant, imminent environmental harm to land, air or water resources;
( 3 ) A statement whether the petitioner requests an evidentiary hearing.
( d ) Any party may file a response to the petition no later than 5 days after it was served and may request a hearing even if the petitioner has not done so.
( e ) The administrative law judge may hold a hearing on any issue raised by the petition within 10 days of the filing of responses to the petition, and shall do so if a hearing is requested by any party.
( f ) The administrative law judge shall issue an order or decision granting or denying the petition for temporary relief within 5 days of the date of a hearing on the petition or, if no hearing is held, of service of the responses to the petition on all parties.
( g ) The administrative law judge may only grant temporary relief if: ( 1 ) All parties to the proceeding have been notified of the petition and have had an opportunity to respond and a hearing has been held if requested;
( 2 ) The petitioner has demonstrated a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits; and
( 3 ) Temporary relief will not adversely affect public health or safety or cause significant, imminent environmental harm to land, air or water resources.
( h ) Any party may file an appeal of an order or decision granting or denying temporary relief with the Board within 30 days of receipt of the order or decision or, in the alternative, may seek judicial review within 30 days in accordance with section 526(a) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. 1276(a). If an appeal is filed with the Board, the Board shall issue an expedited briefing schedule and shall decide the appeal expeditiously.
[59 FR 54363, Oct. 28, 1994, as amended at 67 FR 4368, Jan. 30, 2002; 88 FR 5796, Jan. 30, 2023]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3631] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective September 21, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to reestablish the incident period for this disaster as beginning August 27, 2004, and continuing. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is November 18, 2004 and for economic injury the deadline is June 20, 2005.                

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: September 23, 2004. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-22128 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-60992-CIV-SMITH/REID

SANDRA FRONDEK,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner

of the Social Security Administration, 

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND CLOSING CASE

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation on Cross-Motions for 

Summary Judgment [DE 23] of Magistrate Judge Reid. In the Report and Recommendation, 

Magistrate Judge Reid recommends granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 20] 

and denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 18]. Neither party has filed 

Objections. Because the Magistrate Judge correctly found that substantial evidence supports the 

findings of the ALJ, the Court affirms and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation to the District Judge, denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and 

grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

The Court having reviewed, de novo, the Report and Recommendation on Cross-Motions 

for Summary Judgment and the record, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment [DE 

23] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED, and incorporated by reference into this Court’s Order;

(2) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 20] is GRANTED;

(3) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 18] is DENIED;

Case 0:20-cv-60992-RS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

(4) All pending motions not otherwise ruled upon in this Order are DENIED AS 

MOOT; and

(6) This case is CLOSED. 

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 9th day of December, 2022.

 

cc: All counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-60992-RS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### Alice J. Fink et al., Respondents, v. Jack W. Thompson et al., Appellants.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1067.]
#### Benjamin Lehrich, Appellant, v. G. S. *&*D., Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Finite Element Procedure for Calculating Fluid-Structure Interaction Using MSC/NASTRANThis report is intended to serve two purposes. The first is to present a survey of the theoretical background of the dynamic interaction between a non-viscid, compressible fluid and an elastic structure is presented. Section one presents a short survey of the application of the finite element method (FEM) to the area of fluid-structure-interaction (FSI). Section two describes the mathematical foundation of the structure and fluid with special emphasis on the fluid. The main steps in establishing the finite element (FE) equations for the fluid structure coupling are discussed in section three. The second purpose is to demonstrate the application of MSC/NASTRAN to the solution of FSI problems. Some specific topics, such as fluid structure analogy, acoustic absorption, and acoustic contribution analysis are described in section four. Section five deals with the organization of the acoustic procedure flowchart. Section six includes the most important information that a user needs for applying the acoustic procedure to practical FSI problems. Beginning with some rules concerning the FE modeling of the coupled system, the NASTRAN USER DECKs for the different steps are described. The goal of section seven is to demonstrate the use of the acoustic procedure with some examples. This demonstration includes an analytic verification of selected FE results. The analytical description considers only some aspects of FSI and is not intended to be mathematically complete. Finally, section 8 presents an application of the acoustic procedure to vehicle interior acoustic analysis with selected results.Document ID19910007101Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsChargin, Mladen*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Gartmeier, Otto*(Daimler-Benz A.G., Stuttgart, Germany F.R. , United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberA-90262NAS 1.15:102857NASA-TM-102857Accession Number91N16414Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007101.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### In the Matter of Edgar T. Appleby et al., Appellants-Respondents. James F. Walsh Paper Company, Respondent-Appellant.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovate Oncology, Inc., on Form
10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report" ), the undersigned, Nigel
Rulewski, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                             Date: July August 22, 2005

                             By: /s/ Nigel Rulewski
                             ----------------------------
                             Nigel Rulewski
                             CEO, President & Director
                             (Principal Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       21
### §251. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–304, §1, Dec. 11, 2018, 132 Stat. 4401

Section, R.S. §2141, established a penalty of $1,000 for setting up or continuing a distillery for manufacturing ardent spirits and mandated the destruction of the distillery.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### No Effect on Taxation or State Authority To Regulate Alcohol Within State Borders

Pub. L. 115–304, §2, Dec. 11, 2018, 132 Stat. 4401, provided that:

"(a) No Effect on Taxation.—Nothing in section 1 [repealing this section] or the repeal made by section 1 shall affect State or Federal taxation.

"(b) State Authority Unaffected.—Nothing in section 1 or the repeal made by section 1 shall diminish, enlarge, or otherwise affect a State's authority to regulate the importation and sale of alcoholic beverages within its own borders, including State authority over the manufacture, distribution, transportation, or sale of intoxicating liquors."
§ 3179.101 Repairing leaks. ( a ) The operator must repair any leak as soon as practicable, and in no event later than 30 calendar days after discovery, unless good cause exists to delay the repair for a longer period. Good cause for delay of repair exists if the repair (including replacement) is technically infeasible (including unavailability of parts that have been ordered), would require a pipeline blowdown, a compressor station shutdown, or a well shut-in, or would be unsafe to conduct during operation of the unit.
( b ) If there is good cause for delaying the repair beyond 30 calendar days, the operator must notify the BLM of the cause by Sundry Notice and must complete the repair at the earliest opportunity, such as during the next compressor station shutdown, well shut-in, or pipeline blowdown. In no case will the BLM approve a delay of more than 2 years.
( c ) Not later than 30 calendar days after completion of a repair, the operator must verify the effectiveness of the repair by conducting a follow-up inspection using an appropriate instrument or a soap bubble test under Section 8.3.3 of EPA Method 21—Determination of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks (40 CFR Appendix A-7 to part 60).
( d ) If the repair is not effective, the operator must complete additional repairs within 15 calendar days and conduct follow-up inspections and repairs until the leak is repaired.
### §5121. Claims or suits of Indian tribes against United States; rights unimpaired

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to impair or prejudice any claim or suit of any Indian tribe against the United States. It is declared to be the intent of Congress that no expenditures for the benefit of Indians made out of appropriations authorized by said sections shall be considered as offsets in any suit brought to recover upon any claim of such Indians against the United States.

(June 18, 1934, ch. 576, §15, 48 Stat. 987.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 18, 1934, ch. 576, 48 Stat. 984, popularly known as the Indian Reorganization Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 475 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 12-10624 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 1 :0 8- 00 35 6- W SD-ECS- 13 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us ZULEY SANCHEZ, Defend an t-Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e North ern Dis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Au gu st15 , 20 12 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, BARKETT an d KRAVITC H, Circ ui t Jud ge s PER CURI AM: Je ff P. Ma nc ia gl i, re ta in edco un se l fo r Zul ey San ch ez i n thi s d ire ctcri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m fur th er re pr es en ta ti on of t he ap pe ll an t an d fil eda br ie f pu rs ua ntto And er s v. C al if or ni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2 d 4 93 (19 67 ). Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s t ha t

Case: 12-10624 Date Filed: 08/15/2012 Page: 1 of 2co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se

in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o a rg uabl e is su es of m eri t,
co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andSan ch ez’s co nv ic ti on an d
se nt en ce ar e AFFIRMED
.

2

Case: 12-10624 Date Filed: 08/15/2012 Page: 2 of 2