alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, “Center for AIDS Research” (CFAR).                    

*Date:*                         October 28-29, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lucy A. Ward, DVM, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramual Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, (301) 496-2550,                         *lward@niaid.nih.gov.*

                        (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology,                               ( print page 60408)                            and Transplanation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)                    

Dated: October 4, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-22655 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Omer Gelinas, Appellant, v. Kurt H. Richter et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
No. 14,595.

#### Weir *v.*Colorado National Bank et al.

(101 P. [2d] 1120)

Decided April 8, 1940.

Mr. Harry S. Class, Mr. Warwick M. Downing, Mr. Richard Downing, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Bartels, Blood & Bancroft, for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed in department without written opinion, Mr. Justice Knous, Mr. Justice Otto Bock and Mr. Justice Burke participating.
### §1472. Withholdable payments to other foreign entities

#### (a) In general

In the case of any withholdable payment to a non-financial foreign entity, if—

(1) the beneficial owner of such payment is such entity or any other non-financial foreign entity, and

(2) the requirements of subsection (b) are not met with respect to such beneficial owner,

then the withholding agent with respect to such payment shall deduct and withhold from such payment a tax equal to 30 percent of the amount of such payment.

#### (b) Requirements for waiver of withholding

The requirements of this subsection are met with respect to the beneficial owner of a payment if—

(1) such beneficial owner or the payee provides the withholding agent with either—

(A) a certification that such beneficial owner does not have any substantial United States owners, or

(B) the name, address, and TIN of each substantial United States owner of such beneficial owner,

(2) the withholding agent does not know, or have reason to know, that any information provided under paragraph (1) is incorrect, and

(3) the withholding agent reports the information provided under paragraph (1)(B) to the Secretary in such manner as the Secretary may provide.

#### (c) Exceptions

Subsection (a) shall not apply to—

(1) except as otherwise provided by the Secretary, any payment beneficially owned by—

(A) any corporation the stock of which is regularly traded on an established securities market,

(B) any corporation which is a member of the same expanded affiliated group (as defined in section 1471(e)(2) without regard to the last sentence thereof) as a corporation described in subparagraph (A),

(C) any entity which is organized under the laws of a possession of the United States and which is wholly owned by one or more bona fide residents (as defined in section 937(a)) of such possession,

(D) any foreign government, any political subdivision of a foreign government, or any wholly owned agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing,

(E) any international organization or any wholly owned agency or instrumentality thereof,

(F) any foreign central bank of issue, or

(G) any other class of persons identified by the Secretary for purposes of this subsection, and

(2) any class of payments identified by the Secretary for purposes of this subsection as posing a low risk of tax evasion.

#### (d) Non-financial foreign entity

For purposes of this section, the term "non-financial foreign entity" means any foreign entity which is not a financial institution (as defined in section 1471(d)(5)).

(Added Pub. L. 111–147, title V, §501(a), Mar. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 102.)
### PART II—TAX ON TRANSFERRING FIREARMS

Sec.
5811.
Transfer tax.
5812.
Transfers.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part II consisted of sections 5811 to 5814, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 90–618, title II, §201, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1227.
DOT 

SMARTER I SIMPlER I CUSTOMER DRIVEN __ www _ _ .i_o_w_a_d_o_t_.g_o_v __ 

December 7, 2015 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attention: Byron K. Huffman 

Acting Director, Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Dear Acting Director Huffman, 

Director's Office 

800 Lincoln Way Ames, lA 50010 

Phone 515-239-1111 

Thank you for your November 24 letter to Governor Terry E. Branstad regarding the use of state aviation fuel tax 

revenues in Iowa. As Director of the Iowa Department of Transportation, Governor Branstad directed me to 

respond to your letter. 

State aviation fuel tax revenues in Iowa are deposited into the State Aviation Fund controlled by the Iowa 

Department of Transportation {Iowa Code 452A.82). Revenues in the State Aviation Fund are used exclusively 

for airports and state aviation programs {Iowa Code 328.56). Specifically, Code of Iowa section 328.56{2) states: 

Moneys in the state aviation fund are appropriated to the department of transportation 

for use by the department for airport engineering studies, construction or improvements, 

and the windsock program for public airports and marketing at commercial service airports. 

In awarding moneys, the department shall give preference to projects that demonstrate a 

collaborative effort between airports. 

Because state aviation fuel taxes are directly allocated to the State Aviation Fund and used for aviation programs, 

the state of Iowa is in compliance with the Federal Aviation Administration's policy regarding taxes on aviation 

fuel. Accordingly, the state of Iowa is not required to submit an Action Plan to come into compliance. 

Please contact Tim McClung in our Office of Aviation if you have any questions or would like additional 

information. Tim can be reached at 515-239-1689 or at tim.mcclung@dot.iowa.gov. 

PT:Ip 

Sin~~ 

Paul 

~~ Trombino Ill 

Director
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign and Manufacture of Elastically Tailored Tow Placed PlatesElastic stiffness tailoring of laminated composite panels by allowing the fibers to curve within the plane of the laminate is a relatively novel design concept that has been demonstrated to be both beneficial and practical. In particular, for structures with highly non-uniform stress states, such as the case of a flat panel with a central hole subjected to in-plane loading, the concept is likely to provide substantial improvements in load carrying capability. The objective of the present study is to determine the effectiveness of stiffness tailoring through the use of curvilinear fibers to reduce stress concentrations around the hole and improve the load carrying capability of panels with holes. In this study software was created that translates standard finite element models with traditional laminate definitions into ones that possess stacking sequences with curvilinear fiber paths that are directly manufacturable using an advanced tow placement machine. Preliminary designs for the manufacturing and testing phase were determined through rudimentary design studies for flat plates without holes under axial compression. These candidate designs were then analyzed using finite element models that accurately reflect the test conditions and geometries in order to select final designs for testing. A total of six large panels, measuring three feet by six feet, each of which are used to produce four specimens with or without holes, were fabricated and delivered to NASA for machining and testing.Document ID20020073162Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTatting, Brain F.*(Adoptech, Inc. Blacksburg, VA United States)*Guerdal, Zafer*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg, VA United States)*Jegley, DawnDate AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 2002Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2002-211919NAS 1.26:211919Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-00135PROJECT: RTOP 706-21-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020073162.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 3603.11 What rights pertain to users of community pits?

BLM's designation of a community pit site, when noted on the appropriate BLM records or posted on the ground, establishes a right to remove the materials superior to any subsequent claim or entry of the lands.
#### Roland Wheeler et al., Respondents, v. John P. Burke, Individually and as President-Secretary of International Brotherhood Pulp, Sulphite and Paper Mill Workers of the United States, Canada, and Newfoundland, et al., Appellants.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Me Cum, JJ.
#### Barcalo Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. Maldonado & Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
#### § 4.815 How proceedings are commenced.

Proceedings are commenced by the Director by mailing to an applicant or recipient a notice of alleged noncompliance with the Act and the regulations thereunder. The notice shall include either a notice of hearing fixing a date therefor or a notice of an opportunity for a hearing as provided in § 17.8 of this title. The notice shall advise the applicant or recipient of the action proposed to be taken, the specific provisions of part 17 of this title under which the proposed action is to be taken, and the matters of fact or law asserted as the basis of the action.
### §5370. Losses

#### (a) General

No tax shall be collected in respect of any wines lost or destroyed while in bond, except that tax shall be collected—

#### (1) Theft

In the case of loss by theft, unless the Secretary shall find that the theft occurred without connivance, collusion, fraud, or negligence on the part of the proprietor or other person responsible for the tax, or the owner, consignor, consignee, bailee, or carrier, or the agents or employees of any of them; and

#### (2) Voluntary destruction

In the case of voluntary destruction, unless the wine was destroyed under Government supervision, or on such adequate notice to, and approval by, the Secretary as regulations shall provide.

#### (b) Proof of loss

In any case in which the wine is lost or destroyed, whether by theft or otherwise, the Secretary may require by regulations the proprietor of the bonded wine cellar or other person liable for the tax to file a claim for relief from the tax and submit proof as to the cause of such loss. In every case where it appears that the loss was by theft, the burden shall be on the proprietor or other person liable for the tax to establish to the satisfaction of the Secretary, that such loss did not occur as the result of connivance, collusion, fraud, or negligence on the part of the proprietor, owner, consignor, consignee, bailee, or carrier, or the agents or employees of any of them.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1381; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5370, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 666, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.
#### SMITH, Superintendent of Banks, et al, Respondents, v. GOLDSMITH, Appellant.

(207 N. W. 978.)

(File No. 6080.

Opinion filed March 12, 1926.)

Appeal and Error — Stockholders Liability — Superintendent of Banks —Parties—That Insolvent Bank and Superintendent of Banks May Have Been Improperly Joined in Action to Enforce Stockholder’s Liability Held Not Prejudicial (Const, art. 18, Sec. 3; Rev. Code 1919, Sec. 8937).

That insolvent bank and superintendent of banks may have been improperly joined in action to enforce stockholder’s liability under Const, art. 18, Sec. 3, and Rev. Code 1919, Sec. 8937, held not prejudicial to defendant, where judgment was rendered in favor of superintendent of banks only, in whose favor complaint sufficiently stated cause of action.

Appeal from Circuit Court, McCook County; Hon. L. L. Erppger, Judge.

Action by 'Fred R. Smith, as State Superintendent of Banks, and the Commercial State Bank of Salem, against Charles D. Goldsmith. From a -judgment in favor of Superintendent of Banks and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Bailey & Voorhees*and *M. T. Woods, Jr.,*all of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.

*Parlinum & Parliman,*of Sioux Falls, and *C. H. McCay,*of Salem-, for Respondents.

*581Note. — Reported in 207 N. W. 978. See, Headnote, American Key-Numbered Digest, Appeal and error, Key-No. 1036(2),. 4 C. J. Sec. 2898.

(i) To point one of the opinion, Appellant cited: Mercantile Trust Company v. Miller (Cal.), 137 Pac. 913; Merchants State Bank v. Farmers Home Bank, 199 N. W. 575.

Respondent cited: Mader v. Plano Mfg. Co., 17 S. D. 556; Olson v. Shirley, *12*N. D. 106, 96 N. W. 297.

'CAMPBELL, J.

The Commercial State Bank of Salem', S. D., having gone into the hands of the superintendent of banks of this state in April, 1924, for liquidation, and being then hopelessly insolvent, this action was thereafter instituted by said 'bank and by the superintendent of banks tO' enforce defendant’s liability as a stockholder under article 18, § 3, Constitution of South Dakota,' and section 8937, Code 1919. Findings ,conclusions and judgment were in favor of plaintiff superintendent of banks, and against the defendant, from which judgment and order denying new trial defendant appeals.

Appellant seeks to predicate error upon a misjoinder of parties plaintiff, claiming that the complaint was insufficient to state a cause of action in that it failed to show- a joint cause of action in favor of both plaintiffs. The complaint sufficiently stated a cause of action in favor of the plaintiff superintendent of banks, and judgment was entered in his favor only, and therefore appellant has been in no wise prejudiced by any misjoinder of parties plaintiff, if there was such misjoinder.

Other questions involved on this appeal are identical with those in Smith v. Lucille Goldsmith, 49 S. D. —, 207, N. W. 977, this day decided, and are ruled against appellant by that decision.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

MISER, Circuit Judge, sitting in lieu of SHERWOOD, J.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6592

CURTIS D. SHULER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RICHARD NEELY, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional 

Institution; C. W. CLARK, Supervisor, Food Management, 

Lanesboro Correctional Institution; J. BENNETT, Supervisor, 

Programs, Lanesboro Correctional Institution,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00182-RJC)

Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 30, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis D. Shuler, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis D. Shuler appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and conclude 

there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See Shuler v. Neely, No. 

3:11-cv-00182-RJC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 2920.5-5 Application processing. ( a ) After review of applications filed, the authorized officer shall select one application for further processing in accordance with the notice of realty action. The authorized officer shall provide public notice of the selection of an applicant and notify the selected applicant, in writing, of the selection. All other applications shall be rejected and returned to the applicants.
( b ) The selected land use applicant shall submit any additional information that the authorized officer considers necessary to process the land use authorization.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AT 09/30/99 (UNAUDITED)
AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 09/30/99
(UNAUDITED). IT IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                     35905
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             35905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     241286
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                             48000000
<COMMON>                                   18760
<OTHER-SE>                             (48224141)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               35905
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          208988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (208988)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (208988)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             (208988)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
#### John Kennedy, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 25478.)

Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, *JJ. [175 Misc. 259.]