alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 44.56 How does a unit of general local government file a protest? The protesting local government must: ( a ) Submit evidence to indicate the possibility of errors in the computations or the data on which the Department bases the computations; and
( b ) File the protest by the first business day of the calendar year following the end of the fiscal year for which the Department made the payments.
### **[Subchapter A—Repealed]**
EXHIBIT 2

Case 1:20-cv-22181-JEM Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-22181-JEM Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2020 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 04-18]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Pub. L. 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

      ( print page 60369)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/OPS-ADMIN, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 04-18 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: October 4, 2004.

L. M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 60370)          ( print page 60371)          ( print page 60372)          ( print page 60373)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 04-22689 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### Minnie Frank et al., Appellants, v. H. L. Green Company, Inc., Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-21769-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman

LAZARO JIMENEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

RENT-A-CENTER EAST, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant Rent-A-Center East, Inc.’s Unopposed 

Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Stay Proceedings Pending 

Arbitration [ECF No. 6], filed May 1, 2020. As Plaintiff does not oppose the Motion, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Court compels the 

parties to submit all arbitrable claims to arbitration in accordance with the terms of their arbitration

agreement. 

It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all pending motions, if any, are denied 

as moot, and this matter is STAYED pending the conclusion of private arbitration of this matter. 

All parties shall bear their own fees and costs. The Clerk is DIRECTED to administratively close 

this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 1st day of May, 2020.

 _________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-21769-CMA Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2020 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                    Midwest Medical Insurance Holding Company


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Medical Insurance
         Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
         30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
         date hereof (the "Report"), I, David P. Bounk, President and Chief
         Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350,
         as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of June 30, 2002 (the last date
                  of the period covered by the Report).


         /s/ David P. Bounk
         -------------------------------------

         David P. Bounk
         President and Chief Executive Officer
         August 12, 2002
Case: 14-11111 Date Filed: 03/19/2015 Page: 1 of 3Case: 14-11111 Date Filed: 03/19/2015 Page: 2 of 3Case: 14-11111 Date Filed: 03/19/2015 Page: 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service


Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), today 
terminated a petition for trade adjustment assistance (TAA) that was 
filed by the Wild Blueberry Commission of Maine and initially certified 
on November 6, 2003. Wild blueberry producers will not be eligible for 
TAA benefits in fiscal year 2005.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Upon investigation, the Administrator 
determined that domestic producer prices did not decline at least 20 
percent during the July 2003-June 2004 marketing year, when compared to 
average prices during the 5-year base period ending June 2002, a 
condition required for re-certifying the petition for TAA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean-Louis Pajot, Coordinator, Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for Farmers, FAS, USDA, (202) 720-2916, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5b1b7a4a1a0eba4a1afb0b6b1a8a0abb185a3a4b6ebb0b6a1a4eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6a2a4b7b2b3f8b7b2bca3a5a2bbb3b8a296b0b7a5f8a3a5b2b7f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 23, 2004.
A. Ellen Terpstra,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 04-22650 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 10, 2004.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Prabha L. Atreya, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Biomedical Imaging, and Bioengineering, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
496-8633, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c2d383e29352d3c3e0c212d252062222524622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="35544147504c5445477558545c591b5b5c5d1b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 4, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22651 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 3585.3-1 Who may obtain a mining claimant preference right lease.

Where, consistent with the land use plan, the Secretary has opened the area to mineral leasing and development, the holder of an unperfected mining claim within the White Mountains National Recreation Area—Alaska which was, prior to November 16, 1978, located, recorded and maintained in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws on lands located within the recreation area is entitled to a lease for the removal of the hardrock minerals from the mining claim(s), provided such mining claimant submits a timely application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    APR-30-1999
<CASH>                            6,368,807
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        16,466
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  6,650,369
<PP&E>                              964,061
<DEPRECIATION>                      548,180
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    8,283,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               792,676
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 5,729
<PREFERRED>                              98
<COMMON>                             14,990
<OTHER-SE>                        7,345,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      8,283,025
<SALES>                              45,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     45,814
<CGS>                                17,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        17,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  3,788,779
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                1,952,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (5,691,474)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (5,691,474)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (5,691,474)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (4.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (4.01)

</TABLE>
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40348

Summary Calendar

 

CHARLES KENNETH NELSON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division,

Respondent-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(C-95-163)

 

January 16, 1997

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

Charles Kenneth Nelson, Texas prisoner # 503292, appeals the

judgment of the district court denying his second petition for

habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Nelson has not

established cause and prejudice for failing to raise his Sixth
2

Amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in his first

habeas corpus petition. Duff-Smith v. Collins, 995 F.2d 545, 546

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 933 (1993). Although Nelson

asserts his innocence, he has not supplemented his Sixth Amendment

claim with a colorable showing of factual innocence; therefore, the

miscarriage-of-justice exception does not apply. See Callins v.

Johnson, 89 F.3d 210, 213 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 1996 WL 625764

(U.S. Dec. 2, 1996) (No. 96-6391). Nelson has not shown that it is

more likely than not that but for the asserted errors of his

counsel no reasonable juror would have convicted him. Schlup v.

Delo, 115 S.Ct. 851, 867 (1995). The judgment of the district

court in favor of the respondent is AFFIRMED on grounds that

Nelson’s second habeas corpus petition constitutes an abuse of the

writ. See Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Cases.

AFFIRMED
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:18 AM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Cc: Culligan, Kevin; Elman, Barry

Subject: Time for discussion about EPA's RIA result s compared to EIA and RFF projections

Hi Bob,

On our end, the best time for this discussion is from 10-11 am tomorrow. In particular, we’d like to better understand how EPA’s projection of GHG reductions, esp. in the shorter term (pre-2020, before the EE kicks in) compare with the projections from EIA and from RFF.

EIA results for $10 and $15/ton CO2 price can be found here: http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/aeo/tablebrowser/#release=AEO2013&subject=4-AEO2013&table=17- AEO2013®ion=1-0&cases=co2fee15-d021413a,co2fee10-d021413a,ref2013-d102312a For the Electric Power sector, the reference CO2 emissions in 2020 are 2,081 million metric tons (MMT), at $10/ton CO2 they are projected to be 1,856 MMT, and at $15/ton CO2 they are 1,632 MMT. Is this difference in projections due to the different start date of their carbon price versus the GHG rule kicking in, or something else? Additionally, why are their base case projections for 2020 lower than the reference case from IPM, since IPM uses AEO 2013 as the basis for the power sector?

The RFF paper can be found here: http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-DP-13-23-REV.pdf The Appendix, on page 26, has the model results for comparison.

If tomorrow doesn’t work, I can give you times for next week.

Regards, Cortney
§ 418.24 Precautionary drawdown and spills from Lahontan Reservoir. ( a ) Even though flood control is not a specifically authorized purpose of the Project, at the request of the District and in consultation with other interested parties and the approval of the Bureau, precautionary drawdown of Lahontan Reservoir may be made to limit potential flood damage along the Carson River. The Bureau will develop criteria for precautionary drawdown in consultation with the District and other interested parties. ( 1 ) The drawdown must be scheduled sufficiently in advance and at such a rate of flow in order to divert as much water as possible into the Project irrigation system for delivery to eligible land or storage in reregulating reservoirs for later use on eligible land.
( 2 ) During periods of precautionary drawdown, or when water is spilled from Lahontan Reservoir, Project diversions will be determined by comparison with other years' data and normalized by comparison of differences in climatological data. The Bureau will estimate the normalization in consultation with the District and other interested parties.
( 3 ) Spills from Lahontan Reservoir and precautionary drawdown of the reservoir to create space for storing flood waters from the Carson River Basin that are in excess of the normalized diversions will not be used in calculating Project diversions.
( 4 ) Water captured in Project facilities as a result of a precautionary drawdown or spill will not be counted as storage in Lahontan Reservoir for the purpose of calculating Truckee River Diversions. Such water will not be counted as diversions to the Project unless such water is beneficially applied as described in (a)(5) of this section.
( 5 ) Water from precautionary drawdowns or spills that is captured in Project facilities must be used to the maximum extent possible, and counted as deliveries to eligible lands in the year of the drawdown. If all the drawdown water captured in Project facilities cannot be used in the year of capture for delivery to eligible lands, then that water must be delivered to eligible lands in subsequent years to the maximum extent possible and counted against the water users' annual allocation.
( b ) If a precautionary drawdown in one month results in a failure to meet the Lahontan Reservoir storage objective for that month, the storage objective in subsequent months will be reduced by one-half of the difference between that month's storage objective and actual end-of-month storage. The Bureau is not liable for any damage or water shortage resulting from a precautionary drawdown.
Docket Number FAA-2013-0632
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEnergy transfer processes between Tm(3+) and Ho(3+) in LiYF4The spectroscopic properties of the crystal LiYF4 doped with Thulium (Tm) and Holmium (Ho) ions are studied. The basic processes are discussed that regulate the transfer of energy between these two ions in this crystal. In this system Tm is considered the donor ion and the Ho the acceptor ion. Spectral data were obtained on three samples available: LiYF4:Tm(3+) (0.5 percent), LiYF4:Ho(3+) (1 percent), and LiYF4:Tm(3+) (5 percent), Ho(3+) (0.2 percent). Spectral data, which include absorption, luminescence, excitation, and the response to pulsed excitation in a wide range of temperatures, allowed to look at the energy transfer processes by considering the kinetic evolution of the emission of the two ions (donor and acceptor) involved in the process and the basic spectroscopic properties related to them. This inclusive approach has led to the validation of the physical model.Document ID19910018216Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeThesis/DissertationAuthorsOezen, Goenuel*(Boston Coll. Chestnut Hill, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1991Subject CategoryLasers And MasersReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-187578NAS 1.26:187578Accession Number91N27530Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-955PROJECT: RTOP 590-31-31-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910018216.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3835.11 What special filing and reporting requirements pertain to the different types of waivers? ( a ) *Small miner waivers.* Small miner waiver requests must include a declaration that: ( 1 ) You and all related parties hold no more than a total of 10 mining claims and sites nationwide;
( 2 ) You have completed or will complete all assessment work required by the General Mining Law and part 3836 of this chapter to maintain your claims by the end of the applicable assessment year.
( 3 ) If you were not required to perform assessment work in the previous assessment year, you must include the reason why assessment work was not required in your certification, whether it is because: ( i ) Your claim was located in that assessment year;
( ii ) You paid a maintenance fee to maintain your claim during that assessment year;
( iii ) Assessment work was deferred for that year; or
( iv ) Any other reason recognized under Federal law.
( b ) *Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act waivers.* Your application for waiver must include a notice of active military service or entry into active military service. You must also notify BLM in writing when you leave active duty status.
( c ) *Reclamation waivers.* Your application must include a certified and/or notarized statement that: ( 1 ) States that you are reclaiming the mining claims or sites;
( 2 ) States your intent to end mining operations on the claims or sites permanently; and
( 3 ) References a reclamation plan that you submitted to BLM or that BLM approved; or references a reclamation plan approved by a surface managing agency other than BLM.
( d ) *Denial-of-access waivers.* ( 1 ) Your application must include a statement that you have received a declaration of taking or a notice of intent to take from the National Park Service or other Federal agency or have otherwise been denied access to your mining claim or site in writing by the surface management agency or a court.
( 2 ) You must submit copies of all official documents you have received that demonstrate the declaration of taking, notice of intent to take, or denial of access.
( 3 ) Applying for National Park Service (NPS) approval of a complete plan of operations does not justify your denial-of-access waiver. While the NPS is reviewing your plan of operations, or if the NPS disapproves it but has not denied you access, or issued a declaration of taking or a notice of intent to take, you must pay the annual maintenance fee.
( e ) *Contest actions.* If the Secretary contests your mining claim or site under part 4 of this title, you must maintain the mining claim or site until the Department of the Interior issues a final decision.
( f ) *Appeals.* If you forfeit your mining claim or site and you file an appeal under part 4 of this title and the Interior Board of Land Appeals stays BLM's voidance decision, you must maintain your mining claim or site through the appeals process.