alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 495 

To prioritize the allocation of H–2B visas for States with low unemployment 

rates. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2021 

Mr. THUNE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prioritize the allocation of H–2B visas for States with 

low unemployment rates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prioritizing Help to 

5 Businesses Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 495 IS

1 SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING THE ALLOCATION OF H–2B VISAS 

2 FOR STATES WITH LOW UNEMPLOYMENT 

3 RATES. 

4 Section 214(g)(10) of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(10)) is amended to read as 

6 follows: 

7 ‘‘(10)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) 

8 and (C), the numerical limitation under paragraph (1)(B) 

9 shall not apply to H–2B visas issued to aliens for positions 

10 that are certified for employment pursuant to subpart A 

11 of part 655 of title 20, Code of Federal Regulations, to 

12 perform service or labor in a State that had a seasonally 

13 adjusted unemployment rate of 3.5 percent or lower in at 

14 least 3 of the 6 most recent monthly reports issued by 

15 the Bureau of Labor Statistics during the previous fiscal 

16 half year corresponding to each allotment period of H– 

17 2B visas pursuant to subpart A of part 655 of title 20, 

18 Code of Federal Regulations. 

19 ‘‘(B) The number of aliens exempted from the numer20 ical limitation pursuant to subparagraph (A) in any State 

21 during any fiscal year may not exceed the lesser of— 

22 ‘‘(i) 125 percent of the number of visas issued 

23 to aliens working in such State during the most re24 cently concluded fiscal year; or 

25 ‘‘(ii) 2,500. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 495 IS

1 ‘‘(C) If more H–2B visa applications are received in 

2 a fiscal year on behalf of aliens desiring to work in a State 

3 described in subparagraph (A) than the limit set forth in 

4 subparagraph (B)— 

5 ‘‘(i) eligible applicants, in a number equal to 

6 such limit, shall be selected, by lottery, from such 

7 applications for the exemption under subparagraph 

8 (A); and 

9 ‘‘(ii) the remaining applicants shall be subject 

10 to the numerical limitation under paragraph 

11 (1)(B).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### §4227. Cross reference

**For exception for a sale to an Indian tribal government (or its subdivision) for the exclusive use of an Indian tribal government (or its subdivision), see section 7871.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 496, §4226; renumbered §4227, June 29, 1956, ch. 462, title II, §207(a), 70 Stat. 391; amended Pub. L. 89–44, title II, §208(f), June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 141; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1904(a)(5), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1811; Pub. L. 97–473, title II, §202(b)(8), Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2610; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title VII, §735(c)(11), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 983; Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1899A(49), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2961.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–514 amended section generally, substituting "reference" for "references" in section catchline, struck out par. (1) designation, substituted "exception" for "exemption", and struck out par. (2) relating to cross reference to credit for taxes on tires.

1984—Par. (2). Pub. L. 98–369 struck out "and tubes" after "on tires".

1983—Pub. L. 97–473 designated existing provisions as par. (2) and added par. (1).

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out pars. (1) and (3) relating to cross references to exemption from tax in case of certain sales to the United States and to administrative provisions of general applicability, respectively.

1965—Par. (2). Pub. L. 89–44 struck out "and automobile radio and television receiving sets," after "tires and inner tubes,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–369 effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the provisions of the Highway Revenue Act of 1982, title V of Pub. L. 97–424, to which such amendment relates, see section 736 of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 4051 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1983 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 97–473, see section 204(5) of Pub. L. 97–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 7871 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–455 effective on first day of first month which begins more than 90 days after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1904(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 4041 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1965 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 89–44 applicable with respect to articles sold on or after June 22, 1965, except insofar as such amendments related to the taxes imposed by sections 4061(b), 4091, and 4131 and, as to such taxes, applicable with respect to articles sold on or after January 1, 1966, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 89–44, set out as a note under section 4161 of this title.
Case 1:20-cv-22244-JEM Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-22244-JEM Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2020 Page 2 of 2
National Park Service

U.S. Department of the Interior

Resource Stewardship Scout Ranger Program

Unit Activity Tracking Sheet

Unit:

Council:

Date Park Park Contact What Scouts Did What Scouts Learned Hours

Total Hours

I certify that these hours accurately represent the 

work the participant conducted on the listed 

projects or programs. 

Unit Leader Signature: 

 Date:

Scout Names:
§ 102.24 Requests for access to records. ( a ) *How made and addressed.* An individual, or his or her legal guardian, may make a request for access to an SBA record about himself or herself by appearing in person or by writing directly to the SBA office that maintains the record or to the FOI/PA Office by mail to 409 3rd St., SW., Washington, DC 20416 or fax to 202-205-7059. A request received by the FOI/PA Office will be forwarded to the appropriate SBA Office where the records are located.
( b ) *Description of records sought.* A request for access to records must describe the records sought in sufficient detail to enable SBA personnel to locate the system of records containing them with a reasonable amount of effort. A request should also state the date of the record or time period in which the record was compiled, and the name or identifying number of each system of records in which the requester believes the record is kept. The SBA publishes notices in the Federal Register that describe its systems of records. A description of the SBA's systems of records also may be found at *http://www.sba.gov/foia/systemrecords.doc .*
( c ) *Verification of identity.* Any individual who submits a request for access to records must verify his or her identity. No specific form is required; however, the requester must state his or her full name, current address, and date and place of birth. The request must be signed and the requester's signature must either be notarized or submitted under 28 U.S.C. 1746. This law permits statements to be made under penalty of perjury as a substitute for notarization, the language states: ( 1 ) If executed outside the United States: “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). Signature”; or
( 2 ) If executed within the Untied States, its territories, possessions or commonwealths: “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). Signature”.
( d ) *Verification of guardianship.* When making a request as a legal agent or the parent or guardian of a minor or as the guardian of someone determined by a court to be incompetent, for access to records about that individual, the requester must establish: ( 1 ) The identity of the individual who is the subject of the record, by stating the name, current address, date and place of birth, and, at the requester's option, the social security number of the individual;
( 2 ) The requester's own identity, as required in paragraph (c) of this section;
( 3 ) That the requester is the legal agent or parent or guardian of that individual, which may be proven by providing a copy of the individual's birth certificate showing his parentage or by providing a court order establishing guardianship; and
( 4 ) That the requester is acting on behalf of that individual in making the request.
§ 2622.0-1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) Sections 2622.0-1 to 2622.0-8 apply generally to quantity and special grants made to States other than Alaska.
( b ) The regulations in §§ 2621.2 to 2621.4 apply to quantity and special grants with the following exceptions and modifications: ( 1 ) Sections 2621.4(b) and 2621.2(c)(4); and §§ 2621.2(d) (3) and (4) and all references to base lands and to mineral estate do not apply.
( 2 ) Section 2621.2(c)(1) is modified to require reference to the appropriate granting act; § 2621.2(c)(3) is modified to require a statement testifying to the nonmineral character of each smallest legal subdivision of the selected land; § 2621.2(d)(2) is modified to permit as much as 6,400 acres in a single selection; and § 2621.2 is modified to require a certificate that the selection and those pending, together with those approved, do not exceed the total amount granted for the stated purpose of the grant.
[35 FR 9608, June 13, 1970]
#### John C. Whritenour, Respondent, v. Edgar Combs, Appellant.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Hassau county affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
#### § 41.410 Comparable facilities.

A recipient may provide separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex, but such facilities provided for students of one sex shall be comparable to such facilities provided for students of the other sex.
Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM   Document 16-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/09/2020   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.20  [insta10ka2123109ex1020001.jpg]   [insta10ka2123109ex1020002.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020003.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020004.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020005.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020006.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020007.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020008.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020009.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020010.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020011.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020012.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020013.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020014.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020015.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020016.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020017.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020018.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020019.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020020.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020021.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020022.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020023.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020024.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020025.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020026.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020027.jpg]     [insta10ka2123109ex1020028.jpg]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA class of designs for a sparse distributed memoryA general class of designs for a space distributed memory (SDM) is described. The author shows that Kanerva's original design and the selected-coordinate design are related, and that there is a series of possible intermediate designs between those two designs. In each such design, the set of addresses that activate a memory location is a sphere in the address space. We can also have hybrid designs, in which the memory locations may be a mixture of those found in the other designs. In some applications, the bits of the read and write addresses that will actually be used might be mostly zeros; that is, the addresses might lie on or near z hyperplane in the address space. The author describes a hyperplane design which is adapted to this situation and compares it to an adaptation of Kanerva's design. To study the performance of these designs, he computes the expected number of memory locations activated by both of two addresses.Document ID19920002426Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsJaeckel, Louis A.*(Research Inst. for Advanced Computer Science Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1989Subject CategoryComputer Operations And HardwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:188849NASA-CR-188849RIACS-TR-89-30Accession Number92N11644Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-408CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-387Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920002426.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#42993521 v1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 20-22162-CIV-MARTINEZ/OTAZO-REYES 

JULIO LEE HERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GALENOS MEDICAL CENTER CORP., et 

al., 

Defendants. 

/ 

MEDIATOR’S REPORT

Mediation was held on December 10, 2020, with all parties and their counsel present via 

video conference. A settlement was reached. 

Respectfully submitted, 

GRAYROBINSON, P.A. 

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 3200 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 416-6880 

Facsimile: (305) 416-6887 

BY: /s/ Marlene Quintana 

Marlene Quintana, Mediator 

Florida Bar No.: 88358 

marlene.quintana@gray-robinson.com

Case 1:20-cv-22162-JEM Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/10/2020 Page 1 of 2
#42993521 v1 

2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on December 10, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing document was served via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by 

CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized 

to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing on all counsel or parties of record on the 

Service List below. 

BY: /s/ Marlene Quintana 

Marlene Quintana, Mediator 

Case 1:20-cv-22162-JEM Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/10/2020 Page 2 of 2
### Subpart D—Information Regarding Health Insurance Coverage

Sec.
6055.
Reporting of health insurance coverage.
6056.
Certain employers required to report on health insurance coverage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subpart D, consisting of section 6056, related to information concerning private foundations, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–603, §1(c), Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3504.

#### Amendments

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10108(j)(3)(G), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 915, which directed substitution of "Certain employers" for "Large employers" in item 6056 in the table of sections for subpart D of part III of subchapter A of chapter 1, was executed to this table of sections, which is for subpart D of part III of subchapter A of chapter 61, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 111–148, title I, §1514(c), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 258, added item 6056.
Case 9:20-cv-80832-DMM Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2020 Page 1 of 4
Case 9:20-cv-80832-DMM Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2020 Page 2 of 4
Case 9:20-cv-80832-DMM Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2020 Page 3 of 4
Case 9:20-cv-80832-DMM Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/2020 Page 4 of 4
:. 

Jan 27, 2016 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey A venue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Addendum of aircraft for operation under approved Exemption No. 13333, Regulatory 

Docket No. FAA-2015-1848 (Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform 

Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations) 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. (WinTec) respectfully requests an Addendum for the following UAV 

platforms to our previously approved exemption. WinTec will adhere to the same rules and 

regulation as previously approved for Exemption No. 13333, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-

1848. 

Reference approved exemptions: 

1. 3DR Solo: Exemption No. 11935 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1356 

2. 3DR Iris+: Exemption No. 12368 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1976 

3. DJI Inspire 1 Pro: Exemption No. 11463 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0237 

4. DJI Phantom 3 Pro: Exemption No. 12821 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2592 

5. Parrot Bebop Drone: Exemption No. 12396 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1543 

6. TBM X-8 Flying Wing: Exemption No. 12646 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1602 

7. TBM Mini Talon: Exemption No. 12646 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1602 

Appendix A: Manufacturer Small Unmanned Aerial System Information 

v; / '""' 

T: ~ChiefPilot WinTec Arrowmaker 

MadisonT@arrowmaker .com, 

(813) 805-2714
#### § 404.47 How will a feasibility study be conducted under this program?

Feasibility studies will be conducted in accordance with Reclamation's standards governing the approach, process and content of the feasibility study, including the Principles and Guidelines (incorporated by reference at § 404.4). You can obtain information about Reclamation's standards and requirements for conducting feasibility studies by contacting your local Reclamation office.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) onForm 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, W. Russell Scheirman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 7, 2007
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7711

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. SYLVESTER D. JONES, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 4:06

- cr - 00036

- BO

- 2 )

Submitted : April 14, 2022 Decided: April 18, 2022

Before DIAZ and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Sylvester D. Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolin a, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7711 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/18/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Sylvester D. Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended b y the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Upon review of the record, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors weighed against compass ionate release. See
United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329

- 30 (4th Cir.) (per curiam) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate

- release motions), cert. denied , 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the dis trict court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7711 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/18/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Reader Mail, Inc., Appellant, against Sol Fishko, as President of Paper Workers & Distributing Trades Union, Local 447 of International Printing Pressmen and Assistants’ Union of North America, A. F. of L., Respondent.

Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
#### § 404.8 Are there any exceptions that would allow a community with greater than 50,000 inhabitants to be part of an eligible rural water supply project?

Yes. A town or community with a population in excess of 50,000 inhabitants may participate in or be served by an eligible rural water supply project under this program if Reclamation determines that the town or community is a critical partner whose involvement substantially contributes to the financial viability of the proposed project. Such a community could be expected to bear a greater proportionate share of the planning, design, and construction costs than other project sponsors, consistent with their capability to pay and the benefits they derive from the project.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2011 

y1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2011 

143307 

_________________________________________ 

In re Estate of ARNOLD E. MORTIMORE, 

Deceased. 

_________________________________________ 

RENEE HANNEMAN and DEAN 

MORTIMORE, 

Appellees, 

v SC: 143307 

 COA: 297280 

Shiawassee CC: 09-034102-DA 

HELEN M. FISER, 

Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

address what standards should apply and what factors a court should consider in 

determining whether a transaction was the product of undue influence where there is a 

fiduciary relationship between the parties.