alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

I Meddelanden

Kommissionen

----

Översikt över gemenskapsbeslut om försäljningstillstånd för läkemedel fr.o.m. 1 augusti 2005 t.o.m. 31 augusti 2005

(Offentliggörande i enlighet med artikel 12 eller artikel 34 i rådets förordning (EEG) nr. 2309/93 (1))

(2005/C 241/01)

—   Utfärdande av försäljningstillstånd (artikel 12 i rådets förordning (EEG) nr. 2309/93 (1)) Godkännes

—   Ändring av försäljningstillstånd (artikel 12 i rådets förordning (EEG) nr. 2309/93 (1)) Godkännes

—   Indragning av försäljningstillstånd (artikel 12 i rådets förordning (EEG) nr. 2309/93 (1))

—   Ändring av försäljningstillstånd (artikel 34 i rådets förordning (EEG) nr. 2309/93 (1)) Godkännes

Alla intressenter på begäran från nedanstående adresss erhålla den offentliga rapporten om utvärderingen av de berörda läkemedlen och de beslut som rör dessa:

----

(1)EGT L 214, 24.8.1993, s. 1.

----

----

Översikt över gemenskapsbeslut om försäljningstillstånd för läkemedel fr.o.m. 1 augusti 2005 t.o.m. 31 augusti 2005

(Beslut fattat/fattade i enlighet med artikel 34 i direktiv 2001/83/EG (1) eller artikel 38 i direktiv 2001/82/EG (2))

(2005/C 241/02)

—   Utfärdande av nationellt försäljningstillstånd

----

(1)EGT L 311, 28.11.2001, s. 67.

(2)EGT L 311, 28.11.2001, s. 1.

----

BILAGA I

FÖRTECKNING ÖVER LÄKEMEDLENS NAMN, LÄKEMEDELSFORMER, STYRKOR, ADMINISTRERINGSSÄTT, INNEHAVARE AV GODKÄNNANDE FÖR FÖRSÄLJNING, I MEDLEMSSTATERNA

----

BILAGA II

FÖRTECKNING ÖVER LÄKEMEDLETS NAMN, LÄKEMEDELSFORM, STYRKA, ADMINISTRERINGSSÄTT SAMT SÖKANDE OCH INNEHAVARE AV GODKÄNNANDE FÖR FÖRSÄLJNING I MEDLEMSSTATERNA

----

BILAGA III

FÖRTECKNING ÖVER FANTASINAMN, LÄKEMEDELSFORMER, LÄKEMEDELSSTYRKOR, ADMINISTRERINGSSÄTT OCH INNEHAVARE AV GODKÄNNANDE FÖR FÖRSÄLJNING I MEDLEMSSTATERNA

Läkemedel som innehåller ATOMOXETIN med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

Läkemedel som innehåller CITALOPRAM med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

Läkemedel som innehåller ESCITALOPRAM med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

Läkemedel som innehåller FLUOXETIN med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

Läkemedel som innehåller FLUVOXAMIN med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

Läkemedel som innehåller MIANSERIN med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

Läkemedel som innehåller MILNACIPRAN med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

Läkemedel som innehåller MIRTAZAPIN med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

Läkemedel som innehåller PAROXETINE med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

Läkemedel som innehåller REBOXETIN med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

Läkemedel som innehåller SERTRALIN med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

Läkemedel som innehåller VENLAFAXIN med godkännande för försäljning i den Europeiska Unionen

----
#### § 418.4 Prohibited deliveries.

The District must not deliver Project water or permit its use except as provided in this part. No Project water will be released in excess of the maximum allowable diversion or delivered to ineligible lands. Delivery of water to land in excess of established water duties is prohibited.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida

KEY WEST POLICE & FIRE PENSION FUND, on 

behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,

20-CV-22109

RYDER SYSTEM, INC., ROBERT E. SANCHEZ, 

ART A. GARCIA, and SCOTT T. PARKER,

Dennis C. Cooke

7240 LEMON GRASS DR

PARKLAND, FL 33076

Case 1:20-cv-22109-JB Document 28-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

20-CV-22109 0.00

Case 1:20-cv-22109-JB Document 28-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2020 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4.394

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 181207 dated May 31, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until May 31, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated March 02, 2020 No. 89-рчс

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/   A.А. Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here 
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:
  MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS 
   COMMUNICATIONS 
   OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 
   FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION 
   IN THE SPHERE 
   OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION 
   TECHNOLOGY 
   AND MASS MEDIA 
   PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 118277
### **Subchapter D—Periods of Limitation in Judicial Proceedings**

Sec.
6531.
Periods of limitation on criminal prosecutions.
6532.
Periods of limitation on suits.
6533.
Cross references.
# Službeni list C 219I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 219I |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 63.3. srpnja 2020. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 219I

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 63.3. srpnja 2020.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | IV.   Obavijesti |
| | OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Europska komisija |
| 2020/C 219 I/01 | Obavijest o odgodi stupanja na snagu primjene odredbi MiFIR-a o otvorenom pristupu na izvedenice kojima se trguje na burzi | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

IV.   Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europska komisija

2020/C 219 I/01

Obavijest o odgodi stupanja na snagu primjene odredbi MiFIR-a o otvorenom pristupu na izvedenice kojima se trguje na burzi

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

IV. Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europska komisija

| 3.7.2020 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CI 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2020

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CI 219/1

---

Obavijest o odgodi stupanja na snagu primjene odredbi MiFIR-a o otvorenom pristupu na izvedenice kojima se trguje na burzi

(2020/C 219 I/01)

U članku 54. stavku 2. Uredbe (EU) br. 600/2014 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća (1) („MiFIR”) propisano je prijelazno razdoblje u kojem se članak 35. ili članak 36. MiFIR-a ne primjenjuje na središnje druge ugovorne strane ili mjesta trgovanja koji su za izvedenice kojima se trguje na burzi zatražili da im se odobri izuzeće od prijelaznog aranžmana.

Prijelazno razdoblje istječe 3. srpnja 2020. Aktualno tržišno okruženje visokog stupnja neizvjesnosti i volatilnosti zbog pandemije bolesti COVID-19 povećava operativne rizike za središnje druge ugovorne strane i mjesta trgovanja. Zbog povećanog rizika nužno je povesti više računa o kontinuitetu poslovanja, a ocjena zahtjevâ za pristup u sadašnjem bi okruženju mogla nepovoljno utjecati na uredno funkcioniranje tržištâ za trgovanje i poravnanje izvedenica kojima se trguje na burzi. Suzakonodavci su stoga dogovorili produljenje prijelaznog razdoblja do 3. srpnja 2021.

Zato bi sudionici na tržištu trebali znati da su suzakonodavci dogovorili produljenje prijelaznog razdoblja iz članka 54. stavka 2. u vezi s člankom 35. ili člankom 36. MiFIR-a, s učinkom od 4. srpnja 2020. Produljenje se primjenjuje na one središnje druge ugovorne strane ili mjesta trgovanja koji su za izvedenice kojima se trguje na burzi od svojih nadležnih tijela zatražili da im se odobri izuzeće od prijelaznog aranžmana.

---

(1)  SL L 173, 12.6.2014., str. 84.

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 27, 2010

y0419 

# Order

April 27, 2010

140337

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140337 COA: 286549 Macomb CC: 2 007-005626-FH ROBERT EDWARD TATMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 24, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Union Trust Company of New York, as Substituted Administrator, etc., of Edward Warren Day, Deceased, Respondent, v. Elbert H. Day and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Evelyn D. Bruner and George K. Day, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent payable out of the estate, upon the authority of *Matter of Robinson*(203 W. Y. 380); *Matter of Cunningham*(206 id. 601); *Matter of Davis*(77 Misc. Rep. 72; affd., 156 App. Div. 911). Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

August 10, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Carson Geber Exemption Request Under Section 333 

of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 49 

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Carson Geber an operator of Small Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct full service photography and videography, 

seeks exemption from the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to allow 

commercial operation of the DJI Phantom Series and DJI Inspire within the National 

Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low-risk, aerial video and photography of Real 

Estate Properties (for homeowners, realtors, home builders, home contractors and / or 

home inspectors for real estate marketing and inspection of home exteriors) as well as 

filming of special events, and film sets over certain areas of the United States, conducted 

within and under the conditions outlined herein, or as may be established by the FAA, as 

required by Section 333 requirements. 

Carson Geber in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the requirements of 

14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2),and 91.417(a) and (b). 

Carson Geber has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition 

because it would not set any precedent and because the relief requested is identical to 

numerous exemptions granted previously by the FAA. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. 

In addition, Carson Geber will be utilizing the same DJI Phantom Series and DJI Inspire

proven technologies the FAA has already accepted and approved in over 75 percent of 

approved exemptions. All of the appropriate documentation to accompany Carson 

Geber’s Section 333 Petition is included. Combined, the comprehensive Section 333 
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given to these chosen products and 

the technology, should provide the support necessary to the FAA for a Summary Grant 

of Carson Geber’s Section 333 Petition and expedite the process. 

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Joe Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59641-59642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22304]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

September 14, 2004.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before November 4, 
2004 to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1882.
    Form Number: IRS Form 8877.

[[Page 59642]]

    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Request for Waiver of Annual Income Recertification 
Requirement for the Low-Income Housing Credit.
    Description: Owners of low-income housing buildings that are 100% 
occupied by low-income tenants may request a waiver from the annual 
recertification of income requirement, as provided by Code section 
42(g)(8)(B).
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, individuals or 
households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 200.
    Estimated Burden Hours Respondent/Recordkeeper:

 
 
 
Recordkeeping..........................  5 hr., 15 min.
Learning about the law or the form.....  1 hr., 17 min.
Preparing, Copying, assembling and       1 hr., 25 min.
 sending the form to the IRS.
 

    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 1,598 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-1890.
    Revenue Procedure Number: Revenue Procedure 2004-44.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Extension of the Amortization Period.
    Description: This revenue procedure describes the process for 
obtaining an extension of the amortization period for the minimum 
funding standards set forth in section 412(e) of the Code.
    Respondents: Business of other for-profit, not-for-profit 
institutions, farms, State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 25.
    Estimated Burden Hours Respondent/Recordkeeper: 100 hours.
    Frequency of response: Other (one response).
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 2,500 hours.

Clearance Officer: Paul H. Finger (202) 622-4078, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20224.
OMB Reviewer: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr. (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-22304 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Perrachon, Chief Executive Officer of TouchTunes Music Corporation ("the
Company"), have reviewed the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and based on the inquiries I have
made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that for
the periods covered by the Report:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ John Perrachon
------------------
John Perrachon
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2005

THIS CERTIFICATE IS BEING MADE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE BY THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE COMPANY WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 906, AND
SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A PART OF THE REPORT OR FILED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE.

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.


                                       27
November 10 2009
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T35N

T34N

T33N

T32N

T31N

T30N

T29N

T28N

T27N

T26N

T25N

R114W R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

T36N

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

Visual Resource

Management Classes

Map 2-30

Alternative 4

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Class I - Preserve the Existing Character of the Landscape

Class II - Retain the Existing Character of the Landscape

Class III - Partially Retain the Existing Character of the Landscape

Class IV - Provide Activities that Require Major Modifications

to the Existing Character of the Landscape
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carmine J. Picozzi, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Murray Goldstein, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gabriel Berger, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Irving Levitt, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rubin Nussbaum, Appellant.

It was error to refuse to take the testimony of the police officers, who had been identified by defendants and who were sworn to have spoken with defendants in the presence of complainant, at a time when she swore she was under restraint by defendants and “ scared ” and “ excited ” and wanted to get away from them, and which was not more than two hours before the alleged forced intercourse. Positive identification of *671defendants by the officers was not a necessary preliminary to the examination of the officers as to what occurred. *(People*v. *Strollo,*191 N. Y. 42; *King*v. *New York Central & Hudson Riv. R. R. Co.,*72 N. Y. 607; 2 Wigmore on Evidence [3d ed.], § 658.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Baldomero ACUNA-SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40635.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Baldomero Aeuna-Salazar (Acuna) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced to 70 months of imprisonment and two years of supervised release. Acuna’s constitutional challenge to the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. *2821219, 140 L.Ed.2d 850 (1998). Although Acuna contends' that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert, denied,*- U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Acuna properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review..

Acuna also argues that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release and that this condition should therefore be vacated. This claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.