alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FW: Pesticide Data

MOORE Beth 

t

o

:

Jordan Page 02/16/2010 01:04 PM

Cc: "FULTS Janet E", "MASTERSON Kevin"

From: "MOORE Beth" <MOORE.Beth@deq.state.or.us>

To: Jordan Page/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "FULTS Janet E" <Janet.E.Fults@state.or.us>, "MASTERSON Kevin" 

<MASTERSON.Kevin@deq.state.or.us>

Jordon.  These are summaries that may be useful>  please call me if you have any questions about them.

Beth Moore

General Permits Coordinator

DEQ WQ-Surface Water Management

Phone: (503) 229-6402

Fax: (503) 229-6037

From: FULTS Janet E 

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:08 AM

To: MOORE Beth

Cc: MASTERSON Kevin

Subject: Re: Pesticide Data

Beth,

This is some data that Kevin summarized for another reason, but it may be helpful.

Also, I thought that Kevin already made a comment on the data that you had sent to EPA. As I 

remember it was over 4500 data points. Is my memory correct?

Janet

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Sep 18, 2008, at 12:47 PM, MASTERSON Kevin wrote:

Hi Danelle

It was nice meeting you as well. Thanks for your interest in our pesticide monitoring 

and stewardship activities. I've attached the following information 

z Documents that summarize data from 4 of the 5 surface watersheds we're 

working in (the 5th just got underway in '07 and I haven't crunched the data yet). 

These include 3 PowerPoint presentations and 1 Word summary report . 

Simazine was found in all 4 of the watersheds highlighted in the attached 

documents, with the highest levels found in the Willamette Valley watersheds 

(Pudding and Clackamas) where ag land uses (as well as other non-ag land 
uses) are quite diverse. The other two watersheds (Hood and Walla Walla) are 

largely comprised of fruit orchards. I should also note that up until now, we've 

analyzed for a limited range of pesticides to keep costs low. Specifically we've 

looked for the organophosphate insecticides & degradates, atrazine and 

simazine, one insect growth regulator and a pyrethroid. This coming year we will 

be expanding the pesticide list included in our monitoring quite substantially.

z 1-page fact sheet on the Pesticide Stewardship Partnership program, under 

which all of this monitoring is being done.

Also, here's a link to our Laboratory database where anyone can look at the raw data 

(note: it includes ALL of our agency monitoring data): 

http://www.deq.state.or.us/lab/lasar.htm I can also send you Excel spreadsheets if 

you're interested.

Let me know if you have questions.

Kevin

Kevin Masterson

Agency Toxics Coordinator

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 

811 SW 6th Avenue

Portland, OR 97204 

Ph. (503) 229-5615 

Fax (503) 229-5408
### §704. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 733, §14, 68 Stat. 727, which revoked corporate charter of Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon and provided for termination of Federal power with regard to tribe, was omitted in view of Federal recognition and restoration of corporate charter of Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon by former section 713b of this title.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Public Service Commission for the First District of the State of New York, Respondent, etc., Relative to Acquiring Certain Lots, etc., at the Foot of Montague Street, in the Borough of Brooklyn, etc. New York Dock Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to §906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
Form 10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 16, 2007



/s/    WILLIS H. NEWTON, JR.Name:

Willis H. Newton, Jr.Title:

Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer
# DRAFT

**Subject:** Meeting with Portland Cement Association and Affiliates

– Reconsideration and

Petition Is sues **Location:** U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park, NC **Date:** March 14, 2012 **Participants:** Portland Cement Association (PCA ) An dy O’Hare, PCA John Holmes Nancy Garnett, TXI (by

telephone) Curtis L esslie, Ash Grove Tim Matts, L ehigh Jason Morin, Holcim? Dan Nugent, Buzzi Unicem Mike Pelan, Lafarge Satish Sheth, Cemex Hector Ybanez, Holcim U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (E PA) Keith Barnett Sharon Nizich Peter Westlin RTIInternational Matt Hakos Mike Laney

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss issues regarding the Holcim petition and the MACT reconsideration. The following issues were discussed :  Next steps regardin g the Holcim PM petition.  Clinker work practice standards .  Potential modifications to the HAP alternative to the THC standard.  Startup and shut down definitions and work practice standards.  HCl CEMS requirements for sorbent injection (dry scrubbing te chnologies) and PS - 1 5 .  Alternative particulate matter (PM) equation.  Potential regulatory

action for various coal mill configurations.  PM limit for modified sources under the NSPS.
#### Mary Senatore et al., Appellants, v. Harry M. Stevens, Inc., et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 1:20-cv-21887-XXXX Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:20-cv-21887-XXXX Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 3809.900 Will BLM allow the public to visit mines on public lands? ( a ) If requested by any member of the public, BLM may sponsor and schedule a public visit to a mine on public land once each year. The purpose of the visit is to give the public an opportunity to view the mine site and associated facilities. Visits will include surface areas and surface facilities ordinarily made available to visitors on public tours. BLM will schedule visits during normal BLM business hours at the convenience of the operator to avoid disruption of operations.
( b ) Operators must allow the visit and must not exclude persons whose participation BLM authorizes. BLM may limit the size of a group for safety reasons. An operator's representative must accompany the group on the visit. Operators must make available any necessary safety training that they provide to other visitors. BLM will provide the necessary safety equipment if the operator is unable to do so.
( c ) Members of the public must provide their own transportation to the mine site, unless provided by BLM. Operators don't have to provide transportation within the project area, but if they don't, they must provide access for BLM-sponsored transportation.
San Mateo, CA
                                                          September 28, 1999
                                                          $100,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), with interest from the
date  hereof at a rate of ten percent  (10%) per annum,  which  amount  shall be
secured  by all of the  assets  of  Borrower.  Said  principal  shall be due and
payable on demand by  Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,  but in no
event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred eighty (180) days after
the date of this Note. This Note may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1. Subordination - Creditor subordinates to Business Finance ("BF") any
security  interest or lien that  Creditor  may have in any property of Borrower.
All Subordinated  Debt is subordinated in right of payment to all obligations of
Borrower to BF now existing or hereafter arising.

         2.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         3. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         4.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 28 day of September, 1999.

                                           Hypermedia Communications, Inc.

                                           By: __________________

                                           Title: ________________
#### Kimbrell *v.*Bush.

December 15, 1910.

Injunction. Before Judge Worrill. Miller superior court. January-20, 1910.

*W. I. Geer*and *J. B. Pottle,*for plaintiff in error.

P. *D. Bich*and *Bush &*Stapleton,'contra.

Atkinson, J.

The plaintiff, who was an heir at law of an intestate, eon-tended that the widow had entered into an agreement with the other heirs of the deceased, hy which she was to take certain personalty and occupy certain real estate for a specified time free of rent, and also to have a child’s part in other property of the intestate, after the payment of debts, in lieu of dower and year’s support, and that in pursuance of such agreement the widow had occupied the real estate, and that the administrator had sold the land in controversy, but the widow was nevertheless seeking to have dower assigned in it. The defendant, who was the widow, denied making such an agreement, and attacked it as procured by fraud, and also attacked the administrator’s sale. The evidence in support of the respective contentions being conflicting, there was no abuse of discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction restraining the widow from proceeding to have dower assigned.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 41.550 Sex as a bona fide occupational qualification.

A recipient may take action otherwise prohibited by §§ 41.500 through 41.550 provided it is shown that sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for that action, such that consideration of sex with regard to such action is essential to successful operation of the employment function concerned. A recipient shall not take action pursuant to this section that is based upon alleged comparative employment characteristics or stereotyped characterizations of one or the other sex, or upon preference based on sex of the recipient, employees, students, or other persons, but nothing contained in this section shall prevent a recipient from considering an employee's sex in relation to employment in a locker room or toilet facility used only by members of one sex.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 0:20-cv-61023-RAR-Ruiz

MATTHEW BUCKLEY and

TOP GUN OPTIONS, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

EMMETT MOORE and 

TRADINGSCHOOLS.ORG,

 Defendants.

 /

DECLARATION OF SUSANNE ARANI

1. I, Susanne Arani, declare, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1746 and under penalty of 

perjury, that the following is true and correct:

2. I am one of the attorneys acting as counsel for Defendants Emmett Moore and 

tradingschools.org (“Defendants”) in the above-captioned matter, and I have been admitted to 

this Court pro hac vice.

3. I am submitting this declaration in support of Defendants’ Reply Brief In Support of their

Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of an email sent from me as 

defense counsel to counsel for Plaintiffs, Ms. Debi Gheorge-Alten, dated March 9, 2020.

5. On or about December 8, 2020, I identified what is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 in 

Defendants’ initial Rule 26 disclosure as an email sent from Defense counsel to Plaintiffs’ 

counsel, dated March 9, 2020. 

6. On or about December 11, 2020, I again identified what is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 in 

Defendants’ (Amended) Rule 26 disclosure as an email sent from counsel for Defendants to 

Case 0:20-cv-61023-RAR Document 54 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Plaintiffs’ counsel, dated March 9, 2020, and that this second disclosure was made hours before 

Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the State of 

California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed December 18, 2020, at Vista, California.

Susanne Arani, Esq. /s/Susanne Arani

(Signature)

Case 0:20-cv-61023-RAR Document 54 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §5120. Continuation of allowances

The Secretary of the Interior is directed to continue the allowance of the articles enumerated in section 17 of the Act of March 2, 1889 (23 Stat. L. 894), or their commuted cash value under the Act of June 10, 1896 (29 Stat. L. 334), to all Sioux Indians who would be eligible, but for the provisions of this Act, to receive allotments of lands in severalty under section 19 of the Act of May 29, 1908 (25 Stat. L. 451), or under any prior Act, and who have the prescribed status of the head of a family or single person over the age of eighteen years, and his approval shall be final and conclusive, claims therefor to be paid as formerly from the permanent appropriation made by said section 17 and carried on the books of the Treasury for this purpose. No person shall receive in his own right more than one allowance of the benefits, and application must be made and approved during the lifetime of the allottee or the right shall lapse. Such benefits shall continue to be paid upon such reservation until such time as the lands available therein for allotment on June 18, 1934, would have been exhausted by the award to each person receiving such benefits of an allotment of eighty acres of such land.

(June 18, 1934, ch. 576, §14, 48 Stat. 987.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 17 of the Act of March 2, 1889, referred to in text, probably means section 17 of act Mar. 2, 1889, ch. 405, 25 Stat. 894, which is not classified to the Code.

Act of June 10, 1896, referred to in text, is act June 10, 1896, ch. 398, 29 Stat. 334, which is not classified to the Code.

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 18, 1934, ch. 576, 48 Stat. 984, popularly known as the Indian Reorganization Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5101 of this title and Tables.

Section 19 of the Act of May 29, 1908, referred to in text, probably means section 19 of act May 29, 1908, ch. 216, 35 Stat. 451, which is not classified to the Code.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 474 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO. 20-21964-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TCA FUND MANAGEMENT 

GROUP CORP., et al., 

Defendants, 

TCA GLOBAL CREDIT FUND, LP, et al., 

Relief Defendants. 

_____________________________________/ 

WHISTLEBLOWER’S, THOMAS DAY, NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

WHISTLEBLOWER’S MOTION AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

SEEKING CLARIFICATION ON SCOPE OF BLANKET STAY 

AND RELIEF FROM THE SAME [ECF No. 209]

Whistleblower, Thomas Day, through undersigned counsel, hereby withdraws his 

previously filed Whistleblower’s, Thomas Day, Notice of Withdrawal of Whistleblower’s Motion 

and Incorporated Memorandum of Law Seeking Clarification on Scope of Blanket Stay and Relief 

from the Same [ECF No. 209]. Day hereby withdraws the aforementioned Motion in its entirety. 

 Respectfully submitted this 10th day of May, 2022. 

 

 By: BUCKLEY BEAL, LLP 

 s/ Edward D. Buckley 

 Edward D. Buckley 

 Pro Hac Vice Pending 

 Georgia Bar No. 092750 

 edbuckley@buckleybeal.com 

 Suite 3900

 Atlanta, Georgia 30308 

Case 1:20-cv-21964-CMA Document 253 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 1 of 2
Whistleblower’s, Thomas Day, Notice of Withdrawal of Motion [ECF No. 209]

CASE NO. 20-21964-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman 

2

Telephone: (404) 781-1100 

Facsimile: (404) 781-1101

HESS LAW FIRM

s/ Ephraim R. Hess 

Ephraim Roy Hess

Florida Bar No. 

erh@thehessfirm.com

205 Davie Boulevard

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33315

Telephone: (954) 585-8599

Attorneys for Whistleblower

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 10th , 2022, a copy of the foregoing was served 

via CM/ECF Notification and/or U.S. Mail to all parties and notification of such filing to all

CM/ECF participants in this case.

s/ Ephraim R. Hess

Ephraim Roy Hess, Esquire

Case 1:20-cv-21964-CMA Document 253 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2022 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Oregon Coast Province Advisory Committee will meet in 
Corvallis, OR, October 14, 2004. The theme of the meeting is 
Introduction/Overview/Business Planning. The agenda includes: PAC 
Subcommittee Updates, RiverPrize Update, Special Forest Products, 2005 
Meeting Theme/Agenda/Dates, Public Comment and Round Robin.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 14, 2004, beginning at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Siuslaw National Forest 
Headquarters, 4077 SW. Research Way, Corvallis, Oregon, 97333.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joni Quarnstrom, Public Affairs 
Specialist, Siuslaw National Forest, 541-750-7075, or write to Siuslaw 
National Forest Supervisor, P.O. Box 1148, Corvallis, OR 97339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Council 
Discussion is limited to Forest Service/BLM staff and Council Members. 
Lunch will be on your own. A public input session will be at 2 p.m. for 
fifteen minutes. The meeting is expected to adjourn around 3 p.m.

    Dated: September 29, 2004.
Michael A. Harvey,
Assistant Recreational Staff.
[FR Doc. 04-22341 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### § 4.416 Appeals of wildfire management decisions.

The Board must decide appeals from decisions under § 4190.1 and § 5003.1(b) of this title within 60 days after all pleadings have been filed, and within 180 days after the appeal was filed.

[68 FR 33803, June 5, 2003]
### §800. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–281, §1(b)(1), May 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 246

Section, act Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 843, §10, 70 Stat. 895, provided for availability of tribal funds for advances or expenditures.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

NIKOL HAVRANEK,

Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 20-cv-80816-DMM

vs.

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff, NIKOL HAVRANEK and her 

undersigned counsel hereby give notice that the above captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, 

without prejudice against Defendant, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, BOARD OF TRUSTEES.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 14, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being 

served this day on counsel of record in this action via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF.

By: /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 0105553

Sconzo Law Office, P.A.

3825 PGA Boulevard, Suite 207

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Telephone: (561) 729-0940

Facsimile: (561) 491-9459

Service Email: sconzolaw@gmail.com

Email: greg@sconzolawoffice.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 9:20-cv-80816-DMM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 1 of 1