alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5182. Cross references

**For provisions requiring recordkeeping by wholesale liquor dealers, see section 5121, and by retail liquor dealers, see section 5122.**

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1356, §5181; amended Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(a)(20), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 283; renumbered §5182, Pub. L. 96–223, title II, §232(e)(1), Apr. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 278; Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11125(b)(16), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1956; Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title IV, §401(a)(243), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1195.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in a prior section 5275(3), act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 651, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–141 substituted "section 5121" for "section 5112".

2005—Pub. L. 109–59 amended text of section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "For provisions requiring payment of special (occupational) tax as wholesale liquor dealer, see section 5111, or as retail liquor dealer, see section 5121."

1979—Pub. L. 96–39 struck out "as rectifier, see section 5081, or" after "(occupational) tax".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–59 effective July 1, 2008, but inapplicable to taxes imposed for periods before such date, see section 11125(c) of Pub. L. 109–59, set out as a note under section 5002 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 810 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
#### In the Matter of James F. O’Kelly, Petitioner, against W. Bruce Cobb, as Acting Presiding Justice of the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, Respondent.

Determination unanimously confirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Tariff of 1816 (Dallas Tariff)

              														Tariff of 1816 (Dallas Tariff), April 27, 1816.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1097,			accessed on August 23, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
OFFICt: OF

SECRETARY Of TRANSPORTAHO.'

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

OEPARTMENT or TRANSPORTATION

HARRISBURG, PE SYLVANIA 17101·1900

- ,

=L:.;:F;

June 19, 2014

The Honorable Anthony Foxx

Secretary of Transportation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Mr. Foxx:

I write to express my full support for the granting of the waiver process regarding

Essential Air Service at both Franklin's Venango County Regional Airport and Bradford

Regional Airport. On April 24, 2014, the Department of Transportation issued Order 2014-4-

26 proposing to eliminate subsidized service at these two markets due to their being under

10 enplanements per service day during the period from October 1, 2012 thru September

30,2013.

Pennsylvania has invested significant capital funds over time in these two airports.

If EAS service is cancelled, those investments will have been wasted. The communi~ies

and Pittsburgh International Airport have spent nearly three years and a significant amount

of money studying the issue with current air service, and have identified a viable solution to

improve passenger traffic and allow both communities to fully satisfy EAS minimums of not

only the 10 enplanement rule, but also the $200 subsidy per passenger rule. The result has

been the addition of three new carriers applying for bids to PIT with greater frequency,

reduced costs and strong model of efficiency. I

Air service within the state is an important economic generator and in some cases of

Pennsylvania EAS airports, a direct business relationship to the burgeoning Marcellus

natural gas sector. As a result of discussions, I am committed to fund a marketing effort to

advertise and promote new connections between PA EAS airports and PIT to help make the

service successful

I appreciate your time and consideration, and believe a positive model has been

brought forth to better the EAS system ensuring access to the National Transportation

System. If you have any questions please contact Toby Fauver, Deputy Secretary for

Multimodal Transportation, at 717.787.8197.

Barry J. Schoch, P.E.

Secretary of Transportation

Sincerely,

1kJr! Ya-L

cc: Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, USDOT

PA Congressional Delegation
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4889 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to clarify the 

funding of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2022 

Mr. HAGERTY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to clarify the funding of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Reserve Loss 

5 Transparency Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BUREAU FUNDING. 

7 Section 1017(a) of the Consumer Financial Protec8 tion Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5497(a)) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through 

10 (5) as paragraphs (4) through (6), respectively; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4889 IS

1 (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(3) PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER WHEN THE

4 FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS INCUR A LOSS.—Notwith5 standing paragraph (1), no transfer may be made to 

6 the Bureau if the Federal reserve banks, in the ag7 gregate, incurred an operating loss in the most re8 cently completed calendar quarter until the loss is 

9 offset with subsequent earnings.’’. 

10 SEC. 3. CALCULATION OF NET EARNINGS USING GAAP. 

11 Section 7 of the Federal Reserve Act is amended— 

12 (1) by redesignating the second subsection (b) 

13 (12 U.S.C. 290) (relating to the use of earnings 

14 transferred to the Secretary) and subsection (c) (12 

15 U.S.C. 531) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; 

16 and 

17 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(e) CALCULATION OF NET EARNINGS AND TOTAL

19 CAPITAL USING GAAP.—For purposes of this section, 

20 earnings and total capital shall be calculated in accordance 

21 with United States generally accepted accounting prin22 ciples.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    Midwest Medical Insurance Holding Company


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Medical Insurance Holding
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David P. Bounk, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of September 30, 2002 (the last date of the period
         covered by the Report).


/s/ David P. Bounk
-----------------------------------

David P. Bounk
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2002
GREAT AMERICAN FINANCIAL RESOURCES, INC.



EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002









In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Great American Financial Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,     the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













|/s/S. Craig LindnerS. Craig Lindner
Chief Executive Officer | /s/Christopher P. MilianoChristopher P. Miliano
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



May 5, 2006



A signed original of this written statement will be retained by the Registrant

and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 4.1380 Scope.

Sections 4.1380 through 4.1387 govern the procedures for review of a written decision issued by OSM under 30 CFR 773.28 on a challenge to a listing or finding of ownership or control.

[67 FR 61512, Oct. 1, 2002]
#### Southern Railway Company *et al. v.*Woodruff.

Fish, C. J.

1. Where on the trial of an action for a personal injury the plaintiff, while on the stand as a witness, admitted that he had not made complaint in reference to the injury to any one save his wife until some days after he -was injured, and other testimony was also admitted to show that he had made no complaint on the night of the injury, exclusion of the testimony of still another witness tending to show that he heard no complaint will not, even if admissible on account of the opportunity of such witness to have heard such complaint if made, require the grant of a new trial, after verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

2. There was sufficient evidence to support the verdict.

*25August 10, 1910.

Action "for damages. Before Judge Reagan. Pike superior court. January 30, 1909.

*C. E. Battle*and *Hoivell Hollis,*for plaintiff in error.

_ *Westmoreland Brothers*and *E. 0. Armistead,*contra.

3. Tlie remaining ground of the motion for a new trial was not meritorious, and requires no discussion.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beck, J.,*absent. *The other Justices concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the forthcoming meeting of the 2004 Science and Technology Quality Review Panel. The purpose of the meeting is to allow the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board to assess the quality and long-term relevance of Air Force Research Laboratory Directed Energy research. Because classified and contractor-proprietary information will be discussed, this meeting will be closed to the public. 

# DATES:

25-29 October 2004. 

# ADDRESSES:

Kirtland Air Force Base, NM. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Major Kyle Gresham, Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Secretariat, 1180 Air Force Pentagon, Rm 5D982, Washington DC 20330-1180, (703) 697-4808. 

Pamela D. Fitzgerald, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 04-22346 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
### §5391. Civil actions

#### (a) Contract defined

For the purposes of section 5331 of this title, the term "contract" shall include compacts and funding agreements entered into under this subchapter.

#### (b) Applicability of certain laws

Section 81 of this title and section 5123 of this title, shall not apply to attorney and other professional contracts entered into by Indian tribes participating in self-governance under this subchapter.

#### (c) References

All references in this chapter to section 5201 of this title are hereby deemed to include section 82a of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–638, title V, §511, as added Pub. L. 106–260, §4, Aug. 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 726.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, known as the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 458aaa–10 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §6657. Bad checks

If any instrument in payment, by any commercially acceptable means, of any amount receivable under this title is not duly paid, in addition to any other penalties provided by law, there shall be paid as a penalty by the person who tendered such instrument, upon notice and demand by the Secretary, in the same manner as tax, an amount equal to 2 percent of the amount of such instrument, except that if the amount of such instrument is less than $1,250, the penalty under this section shall be $25 or the amount of such instrument, whichever is the lesser. This section shall not apply if the person tendered such instrument in good faith and with reasonable cause to believe that it would be duly paid.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 826; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 100–647, title V, §5071(a), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3681; Pub. L. 110–28, title VIII, §8245(a), May 25, 2007, 121 Stat. 200; Pub. L. 111–198, §3(a), July 2, 2010, 124 Stat. 1356.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–198, §3(a)(2), substituted "such instrument" for "such check" wherever appearing.

Pub. L. 111–198, §3(a)(1), substituted "If any instrument in payment, by any commercially acceptable means, of any amount" for "If any check or money order in payment of any amount".

2007—Pub. L. 110–28 substituted "$1,250" for "$750" and "$25" for "$15".

1988—Pub. L. 100–647 substituted "2" for "1", "$750" for "$500", and "$15" for "$5".

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Pub. L. 111–198, §3(b), July 2, 2010, 124 Stat. 1356, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to instruments tendered after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 2, 2010]."

#### Effective Date of 2007 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–28, title VIII, §8245(b), May 25, 2007, 121 Stat. 200, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section] apply to checks or money orders received after the date of the enactment of this Act [May 25, 2007]."

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–647, title V, §5071(b), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3681, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to checks or money orders received after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 10, 1988]."
# Publicatieblad C 249I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 249I |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 63e jaargang29 juli 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 249I

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

63e jaargang29 juli 2020

---

| Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informatie |
| | INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE |
| | Raad |
| 2020/C 249 I/01 | Aanneming van wijzigingen in het reglement van orde van Eurojust | 1 |

Inhoud

Bladzijde

IV   Informatie

INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE

Raad

2020/C 249 I/01

Aanneming van wijzigingen in het reglement van orde van Eurojust

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

IV Informatie

INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE

Raad

| 29.7.2020 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CI 249/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2020

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CI 249/1

---

Aanneming van wijzigingen in het reglement van orde van Eurojust

(2020/C 249 I/01)

Het college van Eurojust heeft op 24 juli 2020 wijzigingen in het reglement van orde van Eurojust aangenomen (1). Deze wijzigingen zijn gehecht aan Uitvoeringsbesluit (EU) 2020/1114 van de Raad van 23 juli 2020 (2).

Voor het college van Eurojust

Ladislav HAMRAN

Voorzitter van Eurojust

---

(1)  Goedgekeurd door de Raad bij Uitvoeringsbesluit (EU) 2019/2250 van 19 december 2019 (PB L 336 van 30.12.2019, blz. 309) en vastgesteld door het college op 20 december 2019 (PB L 50 van 24.2.2020, blz. 1).

1

(2)  PB L 244 van 29.7.2020, blz. 13.

2

---
#### In the Matter of Leopold Sachse, Doing Business as Leopold Sachse Production, Appellant. Edward Corsi, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal by an employer from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which, as to wages paid some of his employees, held him subject to assessments for contributions made under the Unemployment Insurance Law (Labor Law, art. 18). Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ.
Jonathan B. Hill

+1 202 776 2725

jhill@cooley.com

VIA EMAIL TRANSMISSION

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

April 15, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: FAA Docket 2015-0297-0001 (Chapman Aerospace LLC)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Enclosed for inclusion in the referenced docket is a confidential filing made on behalf of 

Chapman Aerospace LLC of its motion picture and television operations manual. It is requested 

that this manual not be included in the public record and it be maintained as confidential as it is 

not distributed to the public by Chapman Aerospace LLC. It contains proprietary and 

confidential business information. 

Should you have any questions concerning this, please contact the undersigned.

Sincerely yours,

Jonathan B. Hill

Counsel for Chapman Aerospace LLC

Encl.

cc: James Williams

Robert Pappas

Thuy Cooper 

Dean Griffith, Esq. 

Jake Troutman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case Number: 20-21707-CIV-MARTINEZ

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE SEALED MOTION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s 

Experts. (ECF No. 121). Defendants filed their motion under seal, yet they failed to comply with 

the procedures set forth in Local Rule 5.4(b). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants’ Sealed Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s 

Expert, (ECF No. 121), is DENIED without prejudice. Defendants must file a motion for leave 

to file under seal “that sets forth the factual and legal basis for departing from the policy that Court 

filings are public and that describes the information or documents to be sealed [] with as much 

particularity as possible[.]” S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4(b). 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 30th day of July, 2021.

____________________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to:

All Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-21707-JEM Document 131 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2021 Page 1 of 1
§ 3830.96 What if I pay only part of the service charges and fees for oil shale claims or previously-recorded mining claims or sites? ( a ) If you pay only part of the service charges due for any document filings or only part of the annual maintenance fees, or oil shale fees, for previously-recorded mining claims or sites, or any combination of these fees and charges, absent other instructions from you, BLM will apply the partial payment in serial number order until the money runs out.
( b ) For any claims or sites for which there are no funds in your partial payment to pay the maintenance fees, oil shale fees, or location fees, you will forfeit the mining claims or sites not covered by your partial payment unless you submit the additional funds necessary to complete the full payment by the due date.
( c ) For any claims or sites for which there are no funds in your partial payment to pay the service charges, BLM will send a notice to you that you must pay the outstanding service charges as described in § 3830.94.
#### Madeline Fitzpatrick et al. v. Thomas E. Murray, as Receiver of Interborough Rapid Transit Company.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.