alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 53—MACHINE GUNS, DESTRUCTIVE DEVICES, AND CERTAIN OTHER FIREARMS**

Subchapter
Sec. 1
A.
Taxes
5801

B.
General provisions and exemptions
5841
C.
Prohibited acts
5861
D.
Penalties and forfeitures
5871

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 53, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 721, was generally revised by Pub. L. 90–618, title II, §201, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1227. The analysis reflects changes:

"Machine Guns, Destructive Devices, and Certain Other Firearms" for "Machine Guns and Certain Other Firearms" in the chapter heading;

"General provisions and exemptions" for "General provisions" in subchapter B;

"Prohibited acts" for "Unlawful acts" in subchapter C.

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
### **Subchapter L—Insurance Companies**

Part
I.
Life insurance companies.
II.
Other insurance companies.
III.
Provisions of general application.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1018(u)(32), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3592, redesignated parts III and IV as II and III, respectively, and struck out former Part II "Mutual insurance companies (other than life and certain marine insurance companies and other than fire or flood insurance companies which operate on basis of perpetual policies of premium deposits)."

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–834, §8(g)(4)(A), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 999, substituted "and certain marine insurance companies and other than fire or flood insurance companies which operate on basis of perpetual policies or premium deposits" for "or marine or fire insurance companies issuing perpetual policies" in heading of part II.
#### § 3861.1-3 Plats and field notes of mineral surveys.

When the patent is issued, one copy of the plat and field notes shall accompany the patent and be delivered to the patentee.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO.: 0:20-cv-60885-PMH

BRANDON THOMPSON,

Plaintiff, 

v.

FORT LAUDERDALE LAW GROUP

SOUTH, PLLC, 

Defendants.

_________________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RESCHEDULE SHOW CAUSE HEARING SCHEDULED 

FOR AUGUST 21, 2023

Plaintiff, BRANDON THOMPSON (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, 

hereby files his Motion to Reschedule Show Cause Hearing Scheduled for August 21, 2023, and, 

in support thereof, states as follows:

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

On July 26, 2023, this Court granted Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Enforce Settlement, For 

Sanctions and Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Against Defendant, FORT LAUDERDALE LAW 

GROUP SOUTH, PLLC (“Defendant”). See ECF No. 77.

In the Court’s Order, Defendant was required to pay all outstanding payments, including 

the previously ordered attorneys’ fees and costs, no later than August 14, 2023. Id. Defendant has 

failed to pay the foregoing.

The Court, amongst other requirements, set an in-person show cause hearing for August 

21, 2023, at 10:00 AM. Id.

Case 0:20-cv-60885-PMH Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2023 Page 1 of 3
Plaintiff requests that the Court reschedule same as undersigned counsel, Noah E. Storch, 

Esq., is out of the jurisdiction on a preplanned vacation with his family. Additionally, undersigned 

counsel was out of the country on his ten (10) year anniversary with his wife when the Court’s 

Order was docketed.

Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court reschedule the August 21, 2023, show cause 

hearing, and that same be scheduled any time from September 5, 2023, through September 9, 2023.

Plaintiff’s Counsel apologizes for this request, and states that same is not, at all, for 

purposes of delay.

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully request that the Court grant 

the instant Motion rescheduling the August 21, 2023, show cause hearing for any time between 

September 5, 2023, and September 9, 2023, and grant such other and further relief as is just and 

proper. 

DATED this 17th day of August, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Noah E. Storch___

Noah E. Storch, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 0085476 

RICHARD CELLER LEGAL, P.A.

10368 W. SR. 84, Suite 103

Davie, Florida 33314

Tel: (866) 344-9243

Fax: 954-337-2771

E-mail: noah@floridaovertimelawyer.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 0:20-cv-60885-PMH Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2023 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 17th day of August, 2023, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of 

electronic filing to all Counsel of Record.

/s/ Noah E. Storch___

Noah E. Storch, Esq. 

Case 0:20-cv-60885-PMH Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2023 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 980

 965

 930

 899

 916

 911

 917

 935

 941

 910

 883

 862

 849

 814

 734

 713

 604

 627

 589

 514

 499

 478

 446

 420

 425

 455

 469

 472

 485

 485

 930

 915

 854

 735

 866

 783

 896

 904

 903

 882

 834

 837

 808

 748

 676

 606

 493

 459

 411

 445

 454

 430

 389

 374

 385

 370

 420

 427

 424

 446

 962

 949

 896

 846

 888

 900

 907

 917

 921

 892

 846

 846

 832

 794

 697

 650

 551

 486

 459

 460

 471

 455

 425

 399

 409

 417

 439

 453

 451

 456

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 8, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 314

 320

 314

 314

 307

 301

 297

 293

 303

 316

 308

 300

 301

 309

 317

 321

 328

 331

 333

 340

 340

 345

 350

 356

 356

 377

 366

 368

 379

 370

 365

 291

 293

 286

 289

 288

 283

 281

 277

 279

 282

 285

 286

 293

 303

 306

 306

 309

 315

 317

 323

 331

 330

 337

 342

 340

 347

 352

 354

 351

 351

 345

 304

 307

 303

 302

 294

 291

 289

 286

 289

 291

 292

 293

 297

 305

 311

 314

 318

 322

 324

 331

 336

 338

 345

 348

 348

 355

 358

 364

 368

 360

 356

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-80801-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

ISSAC ABDINOOR,

Plaintiff,

v.

LEWIS RENTAL PROPERTIES LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions [DE 

17], the Magistrate Judge Matthewman’s Order Granting in Part Defendant’s Motion for Rule 11

Sanctions [DE 24], Defendant’s Affidavit of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs[DE 25-1], and 

Defendant’s Affidavit of Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees [DE 25-2], and the Report and 

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Matthewman [DE 26] (the “Report”), dated November 3, 

2020. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 26] have been filed, and the time for 

filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s 

factual findings in the Report [DE 26] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this 

opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 

(1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). 

 Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the 

Report [DE 26] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with 

the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusion that Defendant Lewis Renal Properties Limited 

Partnership should be awarded its attorneys’ fees pursuant to Rule 11 in the amount of $5,080.00 

against Plaintiff’s counsel, Morgan J. McGrath and that interest be applied at the appropriate 

statutory rate.

Case 9:20-cv-80801-WPD Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2020 Page 1 of 2
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [DE 26] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 

2. Sanctions are entered against Morgan J. McGrath in favor of Defendant Lewis Rental 

Properties Limited Partnership in the amount of $5,800 and interest at the appropriate 

statutory rate, for which let execution issue. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 18th day of November, 2020.

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of record

Case 9:20-cv-80801-WPD Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### Sam Priceman Construction Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Ralph Goldstein, Respondent.

Present — Rolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         387,515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               559,152
<PP&E>                                      11,283,139
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,319,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,604,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,242,969
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,604,201
<SALES>                                      1,924,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,931,613
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,171,911
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             507,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                252,133
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            252,133
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   252,133
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §5055. Drawback of tax

On the exportation of beer, brewed or produced in the United States, the brewer thereof shall be allowed a drawback equal in amount to the tax paid on such beer if there is such proof of exportation as the Secretary may by regulations require. For the purpose of this section, exportation shall include delivery for use as supplies on the vessels and aircraft described in section 309 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1309).

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1335; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 105–34, title XIV, §1420(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1049.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5055, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 613, related to "determination and collection of tax on beer", prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859. See section 5054(a)(1), (2), (c), (d) of this title.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior section 5056, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 613, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1997—Pub. L. 105–34 substituted "paid on such beer if there is such proof of exportation as the Secretary may by regulations require." for "found to have been paid on such beer, to be paid on submission of such evidence, records and certificates indicating exportation, as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe."

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1997 Amendment

Pub. L. 105–34, title XIV, §1420(b), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1049, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall take effect on the 1st day of the 1st calendar quarter that begins at least 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 5, 1997]."
Exhibit 31.1



I, Thomas Stallings, certify that :

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Internet Commerce
   Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our report about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
   committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
   equivalent functions):

   a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      control over financial report which are reasonably likely to adversely
      affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and

   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: June 18, 2004



By: /s/ Thomas Stallings
   ----------------------------
   Thomas Stallings
   Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 3G 

LICENSING S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A., 

Plaintiffs 

§

§

§

§

v. 

HMD AMERICA, INC., and HMD GLOBAL 

OY, 

§

§

§

§

§

NO. 1:20-CV-22051-JEM 

Defendants. §

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL JOSEPH W. BAIN 

Joseph W. Bain, of the firm of Shutts & Bowen LLP, files this appearance as counsel on 

behalf of Defendants HMD AMERICA, INC., and HMD GLOBAL OY in the above-styled cause 

of action. Counsel gives notice that all further pleadings and papers should be served upon Joseph 

W. Bain, Esq., jbain@shutts.com and grogers@shutts.com, Shutts & Bowen LLP, 525 

Okeechobee Boulevard, Suite 1100, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401. 

Dated: August 24, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Joseph W. Bain

JOSEPH W. BAIN, ESQ. 

Florida Bar No. 860360 

Email Address: jbain@shutts.com 

SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP 

1100 CityPlace Tower 

525 Okeechobee Boulevard 

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 

Telephone: (561) 835-8500 

Facsimile: (561) 650-8530 

Attorneys for Defendants HMD America, Inc. and 

HMD Global OY 

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 24th day of August 2020, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of court by using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send email notification of such filing to all parties of record. 

/s/ Joseph W. Bain

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2020 Page 2 of 2
### PART II—EXEMPTIONS

Sec.
5851.
Special (occupational) tax exemption.
5852.
General transfer and making tax exemption.
5853.
Transfer and making tax exemption available to certain governmental entities.
5854.
Exportation of firearms exempt from transfer tax.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title IV, §401(a)(253), (254), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1196, substituted "General transfer and making tax exemption" for "General transfer and making exemption" in item 5852 and "Transfer and making tax exemption available to certain governmental entities" for "Exemption from transfer and making tax available to certain governmental entities and officials" in item 5853.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60183-60184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22569]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Official Insignia for the Volunteers-in-Parks Master Ranger Corps 
Program

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Official insignia designation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice serves as official designation of the insignia 
(shown below) for the National Park Service Volunteers-in-Parks (VIP) 
Master Ranger Corps program.

DATES: Action described will be effective upon publication of this 
notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Pietschmann, Service-wide VIP 
Program Coordinator, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW., 
Mailstop 2450, Washington, DC 20240. Telephone: (202) 513-7141. E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fc5e0f6d0dfe6eafbfcece7e2eee1e1cfe1fffca1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87cde8fed8d7eee2f3f4e4efeae6e9e9c7e9f7f4a9e0e8f1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority for the National Park Service VIP 
program is found in the Volunteers in the Parks Act of 1969, 16 U.S.C. 
18g-18j. The Master Ranger Corps is a new part of the VIP program.
    The insignia depicted will serve as the official uniform patch and 
logo for the Master Ranger Corps. The National Park Service began using 
the insignia in January 2004. Use of this insignia is controlled by the 
Director of the National Park Service.

[[Page 60184]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07OC04.023

    In making this prescription, notice is hereby given that whoever 
manufactures, sells, or possesses this insignia, or any colorable 
imitation thereof, or photographs or prints or in any other manner 
makes or executes any engraving, photograph or print, or impression in 
the likeness of this insignia, or any colorable imitation thereof, 
without written authorization from the United States Department of the 
Interior is subject to the penalty provisions of 18 U.S.C. 701.

    Dated: August 18, 2004.
Christopher Jarvi,
Associate Director for Partnerships, Interpretation and Education, 
Volunteers, and Outdoor Recreation.
[FR Doc. 04-22569 Filed 10-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General
Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2015  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures Inc.





|Date:  April 5, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|-------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                     |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
§ 4130.1-2 Conflicting applications. When more than one qualified applicant applies for livestock grazing use of the same public lands and/or where additional forage for livestock or additional acreage becomes available, the authorized officer may authorize grazing use of such land or forage on the basis of § 4110.3-1 of this title or on the basis of any of the following factors: ( a ) Historical use of the public lands (see § 4130.2(e));
( b ) Proper use of rangeland resources;
( c ) General needs of the applicant's livestock operations;
( d ) Public ingress or egress across privately owned or controlled land to public lands;
( e ) Topography;
( f ) Other land use requirements unique to the situation.
( g ) Demonstrated stewardship by the applicant to improve or maintain and protect the rangeland ecosystem; and
( h ) The applicant's and affiliate's history of compliance with the terms and conditions of grazing permits and leases of the Bureau of Land Management and any other Federal or State agency, including any record of suspensions or cancellations of grazing use for violations of terms and conditions of agency grazing rules.
[49 FR 6453, Feb. 21, 1984; 49 FR 12704, Mar. 30, 1984, as amended at 53 FR 10234, Mar. 29, 1988; 60 FR 9965, Feb. 22, 1995; 61 FR 4227, Feb. 5, 1996]
#### In the Matter of the Intermediate Accounting of Elizabeth W. Keesler, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harvey Keesler, Deceased, Appellant. Olive M. McGirr et al., Respondents.

*688No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, 'Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.