alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 12185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04808]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Friday, March 7, 2014.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance, Enforcement Matters, and 
Examinations. In the event that the times, dates, or locations of this 
or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along 
with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

Contact Person For More Information: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

Natise Allen,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2014-04808 Filed 2-28-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
(December 19, 1947.)

#### Edith L. Thistle, Respondent, v. Frederick C. Stutzman, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment as entered to the sum of $5,168.10, in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 644

_____________________________
D ESHAWN M ONTAYE M C Q UEEN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. Michael A. Flowers , Judge

. December 5, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsGeometry and mass model of ionizing radiation experiments on the LDEF satelliteExtensive measurements related to ionizing radiation environments and effects were made on the LDEF satellite during its mission lifetime of almost 6 years. These data, together with the opportunity they provide for evaluating predictive models and analysis methods, should allow more accurate assessments of the space radiation environment and related effects for future missions in low Earth orbit. The LDEF radiation dosimetry data is influenced to varying degrees by material shielding effects due to the dosimeter itself, nearby components and experiments, and the spacecraft structure. A geometry and mass model is generated of LDEF, incorporating sufficient detail that it can be applied in determining the influence of material shielding on ionizing radiation measurements and predictions. This model can be used as an aid in data interpretation by unfolding shielding effects from the LDEF radiation dosimeter responses. Use of the LDEF geometry/mass model, in conjunction with predictions and comparisons with LDEF dosimetry data currently underway, will also allow more definitive evaluations of current radiation models for future mission applications.Document ID19920016957Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsColborn, B. L.*(Science Applications International Corp. Prospect, TN, United States)*Armstrong, T. W.*(Science Applications International Corp. Prospect, TN, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1992Subject CategoryAtomic And Molecular PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-184325NAS 1.26:184325SAIC-TN-9202Accession Number92N26200Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-39121Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920016957.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 281

 273

 277

 276

 277

 284

 292

 302

 310

 321

 342

 333

 344

 364

 364

 377

 367

 379

 382

 385

 380

 380

 378

 373

 369

 386

 382

 371

 359

 364

 262

 265

 269

 274

 274

 275

 280

 285

 293

 305

 315

 321

 326

 333

 343

 347

 358

 358

 367

 365

 360

 355

 350

 350

 356

 360

 360

 347

 350

 352

 268

 270

 272

 275

 276

 279

 287

 292

 300

 311

 323

 327

 334

 344

 349

 355

 363

 369

 372

 371

 369

 366

 359

 358

 360

 367

 368

 359

 355

 357

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-80801-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

ISSAC ABDINOOR,

Plaintiff,

v.

LEWIS RENTAL PROPERTIES LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY DEFAULT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 16], (the 

“Motion”), filed herein on July 24, 2020. The Court has carefully considered the Motion [DE 16] 

and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. 

In the Motion, Defendant argues that Complaint should be dismissed for failing to state a 

claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendant argues that Plaintiff fails to allege any nexus 

between the alleged website and a physical space of public accommodation. In addition, 

Defendant argues that supposed non-compliant website does not exist and did not exist at the 

time Defendant was served with process in this action. 

Plaintiff failed to timely file a response to the Motion. See S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(c)(1). On 

August 10, 2020, the Court issued an Order warning Plaintiff that failure to file a response by 

August 17, 2020 would result in the Court granting the Motion to Dismiss [DE 16] by default. 

See [DE 18]. The Court has not received any response.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motion [DE 16] is hereby GRANTED;

Case 9:20-cv-80801-WPD Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

2. The Complaint is hereby DISMISSED; 

3. The Court will separately issue a final judgment. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 

24th day of August, 2020.

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of record

Case 9:20-cv-80801-WPD Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2020 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        10
<OTHER-SE>                      (10)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-BASIC>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
annual report on Form 10-K/A of MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P., MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp., MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II and MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III (the Registrants) for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2006 |  | /s/ Paul W. Whetsell                            
|                     |  | Paul W. Whetsell                                
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer                         
|                     |  | MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P.
|                     |  | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp.              
|                     |  | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II           
|                     |  | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-22247-CIV-GOODMAN

[CONSENT]

MARIA STATHIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DUFFY’S OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH,

INC., d/b/a DUFFY’S SPORTS GRILL,

a Florida Profit Corporation,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND 

RECOMMENDING THAT THE CASE BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER came before the Court following a settlement conference before

the undersigned and the Court having conducted a hearing concerning the settlement. 

THE COURT has heard from counsel and considered the terms of the settlement

agreement, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the

premises.

This case involves a claim for unpaid minimum wages under the Fair Labor

Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq. ("FLSA"). In reviewing a settlement of an FLSA

private claim, a court must "scrutiniz[e] the settlement for fairness," and determine that

the settlement is a "fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA

provisions." Lynn Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-53 (11th Cir.

1982). A settlement entered into in an adversarial context where both sides are

represented by counsel throughout litigation "is more likely to reflect a reasonable

Case 1:20-cv-22247-JG Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 1 of 2
compromise of disputed issues." Id. The district court may approve the settlement in

order to promote the policy of encouraging settlement of litigation. Id. at 1354.

In this case, there is a bona fide factual dispute as to whether the tip credit was

properly applied. The terms of the settlement were announced on the record in open

Court. The Court has reviewed the terms of the settlement agreement including the

amount to be received by the plaintiff and the attorney’s fees and costs to be received

by counsel and finds that the compromise reached by the parties is a fair and

reasonable resolution of the parties' bona fide disputes. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties' settlement agreement (including

attorney’s fees and costs) is hereby APPROVED. It is further

RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed with prejudice and that the Court

retain jurisdiction until November 13, 2020 to enforce the terms of the settlement. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 21st day of

September, 2020. 

 

 

JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

2

Case 1:20-cv-22247-JG Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2020 Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ISAIAH SHAWN

- SAM GLENN,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 30198

D.C. No. 1:17

- cr

- 00013

- SPW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 201 8 **

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Isaiah Shawn

- Sam Glenn appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 18

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for

failure to register as a sexual offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250 (a)

. We

have jurisd iction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, a nd we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

MAY 17 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 30198

Glenn contends that his within

- Guidelines sentence is substantively

unreasonable. He argues that the district court should have imposed a lower

sentence in light of his mitigating circumstances. The district court did not abuse

its discretion in imposing Glenn ’s sentence. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S.

3 8, 51 (2007) . The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circu mstances , including the

risk to the community posed by Glenn’s conduct

. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51.

AFFIRMED.
#### Frank Weitz, Respondent-Appellant, v. Simmons Tours, Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Glennon and Callahan, JJ., dissent in part and vote to affirm on the appeal by the plaintiff.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Willis H. Newton, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on suchevaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this annual report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 16, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Pharmacology.
    Date: October 25-26, 2004.
    Time: 5 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Sheraton Chapel Hill Hotel, One Europe Drive, Chapter 
Hill, NC 27514.
    Contact Person: Shiva P. Singh, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher 
Building, Room 3AN-12C, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2272, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0a3b9beb7b8a390beb9b7bda3febeb9b8feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0b3a9aea7a8b380aea9a7adb3eeaea9a8eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 29, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22415 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 418.32 Cooperative programs. ( a ) The Bureau and the District will work cooperatively to develop a water management and conservation program to promote efficient management of water in the Project. The program will emphasize developing methods, including computerization and automation, to improve the District's operations and procedures for greater water delivery conservation.
( b ) The Bureau will provide technical assistance to the District and cooperatively assist the District in their obligations and efforts to: ( 1 ) Document and evaluate existing water delivery and measurement practices:
( 2 ) Implement improvements to these practices; and
( 3 ) Evaluate and, where practical, implement physical changes to Project facilities.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

Case No. 20-cv-60885-RKA

BRANDON THOMPSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FORT LAUDERDALE LAW GROUP SOUTH, PLLC, 

A Florida Limited Liability Company, 

Defendant. 

____________________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

I hereby disclose the following pursuant to this Court’s interested persons order:

1.) The name of each person, attorney, association of persons, firm, law firm, partnership, and 

corporation that has or may have an interest in the outcome of this action – including subsidiaries, 

conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporation, publicly-traded companies that own 10% or more of 

a party’s stock, and all other identifiable legal entities related to any party in the case:

a. Brandon Thompson – Plaintiff

b. Noah E. Storch, Esquire - Counsel for Plaintiff 

c. Alexander T. Harne, Esquire – Counsel for Plaintiff

d. Richard Celler Legal, P.A.- Counsel for Plaintiff

e. Fort Lauderdale Law Group South, PLLC – Defendant

2.) The name of every other entity whose publicly-traded stock, equity, or debt may be 

substantially affected by the outcome of the proceedings:

a. None known.

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

3.) The name of every other entity which is likely to be an active participant in the

proceedings, including the debtor and members of the creditors’ committee (or twenty largest 

unsecured creditors) in bankruptcy cases:

a. None other than the persons identified in above.

4.) The name of each victim (individual or corporate) of civil and criminal conduct alleged 

to be wrongful, including every person who may be entitled to restitution:

a. Brandon Thompson – Plaintiff

I hereby certify that I am unaware of any actual or potential conflict of interest involving 

the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to this case, and will immediately notify the Court 

in writing on learning of any such conflict.

Dated this 15th day of June, 2020. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/ Noah E. Storch _

 Noah E. Storch, Esq.

 Florida Bar No.0085476

RICHARD CELLER LEGAL, P.A.

10368 W. State Rd. 84, Suite 103 

Davie, Florida 33324 

Telephone: (866) 344-9243

Facsimile: (954) 337-2771

E-mail: noah@floridaovertimelawyer.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 15th day of June, 2020, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing has been filed using CM/ECF which will send a copy of same to all counsel of record.

/s/ Noah E. Storch_

Noah E. Storch, Esq.

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 2 of 2