alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-21859-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman

In the Matter of the Complaint for Exoneration 

from or Limitation of Liability by Jose Garcia, 

as owner of the 2019 40’ Beneteau Motor Yacht 

bearing Hull Identification No. BENER159L819.

Petitioner.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court based on electronic mail (“e-mail”) titled, 

“response to case 20-21859-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman,” received on August 7, 2020. The 

Court disregards the contents of the August 7 e-mail and informs Third-Party Defendant, Allison 

Dillon-Torres, that every pleading, motion, memorandum, or other paper required and/or 

permitted to be filed with the Court must be filed directly with the Clerk of the Court. No letters, 

pleadings, motions, or other documents may be sent directly to the District Judge or Magistrate 

Judge’s chambers. Any papers improperly delivered directly to chambers will be returned and 

disregarded by the Court. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 10th day of August, 2020.

 ________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Allison Dillon-Torres

Case 1:20-cv-21859-CMA Document 88 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2020 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from 
     RADAR RESOURCES, INC. September 30, 1997  financial  statements and  is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894502
<NAME>                        RADAR RESOURCES, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
C-O-P-y

April 15, 1963

To: Chief Engineer, Denver, Colorado

Regional Director, Region 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

District Manager, Juneau, Alaska

From: Assistant Comaissioner

Subject: Drainage policy

During the last several months the Bureau has been engaged in a

review Qf drainage policy in reference to the investigation program.

As a result of this review, the following guidelines are hereby

established:

1. The cost of drainage may be considered, depending upon the

circumstances, as a project or a farm cost.

2. In those cases where it is appropriate to consider the cost

of drainage as a project cost, it may be provided through the

construction cost estimate or through the estimate of operation

and maintenance cost. Where drainage is considered as a part

of the project cost, the drainage will be accomplished over a

period of time as required. However, in such cases, a cutoff

dare should be established in the re?a~ient contract, afrer

which all drainage will be accomplished through the project

operation and maintenance program. The cutoff date should be

established 15 years after announcement of availability of water

for the project, unit, or block, but may be varied in special

cases with full justification. On projects involving several

blo~ics of land, each having its own development period, a cutoff date would be established for each block of land.

3. In those cases where it is appropriate to consider the cost

of drainage as a farm cost, it may be accounted for either as

a part of the farm investment (land development) or as a part

of the farm operating cost. In some areas significant payments

are made annually by the Government for approved farm drainage

improvements. Such payments should be considered, along with

other farm income, for meeting farm investment and operating

costs. Government program in the local area for which the estimate is being made.
4t

4. The definitions of project and farm drainage have previously

been established and are precisely defined. However, there are

cases where, without excessive investigation costs, the distinc-.

tion between the project and farm drainage will be uncertain and

where it would be possible to classify the drainage as either project or farm. In such cases, it will be permissible to treat the

drainage cost in either category.

5. The effect of the drainage cost estimate upon both economic

justification and financial feasibility may vary depending upon

how it is considered in the analyses.. This fact should be recognized in selecting the procedure to be used.

1sf WILLIAM I. PALI~~ER

2

I
EXHIBIT 1

                  STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                     THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Arthur J.
Seidenfeld certify that:

1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2002
    (the "Report") of Scientio, Inc. (the "Company"), fully complies with
    the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.

Date: November 25, 2002

                      /s/ Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                      ------------------------
                        Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 3861.1 Surveys of mining claims.
#### C. Bertrand Race, Respondent, *v.*Charles B. Krum, Appellant.

Motion for a reargument. (See 162 App. Div. 911.)

Per Curiam:

Upon the motion for reargument the defendant first argues that the admission in the answer of the warranty alleged in the complaint was not intended as an admission of an express warranty, but was intended simply as an admission of an implied warranty. Whatever construction might otherwise be given to the pleadings, it was evidently assumed upon the trial, as is claimed by the defendant, and the construction given to the pleadings upon the trial, both by the court and by coun*925sel, should be the construction which this court will adopt in determining the appeal. It is further urged that an admission in a pleading of an implied warranty is not binding upon the defendant because it is an admission of a legal conclusion. To this proposition we also agree. The motion for reargument should be denied, however, because the majority of the court were of opinion that as matter of law, upon the sale of the ice cream by the defendant, there was an implied warranty that it was fit for consumption; upon this assumption the majority of the court were further of the opinion that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury and, therefore, that the judgment should be affirmed. Motion denied, without costs. All concurred.
#### § 4150.4 Impoundment and disposal.

Unauthorized livestock remaining on the public lands or other lands under Bureau of Land Management control, or both, after the date set forth in the notice and order to remove sent under § 4150.2 may be impounded and disposed of by the authorized officer as provided herein.

[43 FR 29067, July 5, 1978. Redesignated at 47 FR 41712, Sept. 21, 1982]
#### Rita Rondinelli, Appellant, v. Harold Hanson et al., Respondents.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and MeCurn, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   infomration  extracted  from
     ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION   June 30, 1996 financial  statements 
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894551
<NAME>                        ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996

<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
§ 429.6 When must water user organizations also approve use authorizations? ( a ) Use authorizations for easements and rights-of-way for periods in excess of 25 years are also subject to approval from water user organizations under contract obligation for repayment of the project or division. This requirement does not apply to any other type of use authorizations.
( b ) At a minimum, the appropriate water user organizations will be notified of all use authorizations prior to their issuance to avoid potential conflicts between the requested use authorization and the water user organizations' need to operate and maintain the facilities for which they have contractual responsibility.
( c ) At the discretion of the responsible Regional Director, concurrence of the appropriate water user organizations not addressed in paragraph (a) of this section may be requested.
DELTA

MENDOTA

CANAL

SO. BAY AQUEDUCT

C ALIFORNIA

AQUE D UCT

T3S R5E

T3S R4E

T2S R4E

T2S R5E

T3S R3E

T2S R3E

SSAANN JJOOAAQQUUII NN CCOO

AALLAA MM EEDD AA CC OO

CCOONNTT RRAA CCOOSSTTAA CC OO

BANTA CARBONA LIFT CANAL

CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT

SOUTH BAY AQUEDUCT

MOKELUMNE AQUEDUCT

0

0

0

0

0 0

0

7

6

7

6

7

6 5

5

9

1

8

2

1

1

4

8

3

9

9

8

2

2 1 5 4 3 2

4

0

30

31

18

19

19

30

31

11

11

11

30

11

18

19

31

25

19

30

26

26

27

18

21

10

35

15

29 28

32

28

15

12

12

34

24

10

20

26

22

32

23

33

27

23

23

12

21

24

23

16

36

20

34

24 22

22

28

35

21

15

17

29

25

33

25

29

26

26

28

36

13

35

21

27

32

23

17

27

17

28

24

20

26

36

16

16

29 25

25

20

22

33

36

29

12

23

25

26

14

25

14

35

20 24

14

13

21

14 13

36

5

13

0

23 24

17 16

10

4

1

33 35

14

32 34

34

6

27

22

3

7

15

31

3

35 36 32 33 34 35 36

13

30

31

18

19

6

30

11

3

31

3

0

3

TRACY

10

15

27

22

34

10

15

34

22

27

27

10

22

15

34

19

Byron-Bethany Irrigation District

Contract No. 14-06-200-785-LTR1

EXHIBIT A

Contractor's Service Area

District Boundary

0 2.5 5

Miles

214-202-804

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

Date: March 14, 2005

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\byron_bethany\byron_bethany.mxd
#### § 6301.5 Definitions.

Terms used in this part have the following meanings:

*Access* means the physical ability of property owners and their successors in interest to have ingress to and egress from State or private inholdings, valid mining claims, or other valid occupancies. It does not include rights-of-way or permits under section 501 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1761) (FLPMA) or parts 2800 and 2880 of this chapter.

*Inholding* means State-owned or privately owned land that is completely surrounded by Congressionally designated wilderness.

*Mechanical transport* means any vehicle, device, or contrivance for moving people or material in or over land, water, snow, or air that has moving parts. This includes, but is not limited to, sailboats, sailboards, hang gliders, parachutes, bicycles, game carriers, carts, and wagons. The term does not include wheelchairs, nor does it include horses or other pack stock, skis, snowshoes, non-motorized river craft including, but not limited to, drift boats, rafts, and canoes, or sleds, travois, or similar devices without moving parts.

*Mining operations* is defined in subpart 3715 of this chapter.

*Motor vehicle* means any vehicle that is self-propelled.

*Motorized equipment* means any machine that uses or is activated by a motor, engine, or other power source. This includes, but is not limited to, chainsaws, power drills, aircraft, generators, motorboats, motor vehicles, snowmobiles, tracked snow vehicles, snow blowers or other snow removal equipment, and all other snow machines. The term does not include shavers, wrist watches, clocks, flashlights, cameras, camping stoves, cellular telephones, radio transceivers, radio transponders, radio signal transmitters, ground position satellite receivers, or other similar small hand held or portable equipment.

*Primitive and unconfined recreation* means non-motorized types of outdoor recreation activities that do not require developed facilities or mechanical transport.

*Public lands* means any lands and interests in lands owned by the United States and administered by the Secretary of the Interior through BLM without regard to how the United States acquired ownership.

*Valid occupancy* means an occupancy under a current permit, lease, or other written authorization from BLM to occupy public lands. For a definition of occupancy related to development of locatable minerals, see subpart 3715 of this chapter.

*Wheelchair* means a device that is designed solely for use by a mobility-impaired person for locomotion, and that is suitable for use in an indoor pedestrian area.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Paul R. Kimmel,certify that:

 

1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for theyear ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) of MediCor Ltd. (the “Company”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of MediCor.

 
| Date: July 24, 2006 |                    |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|
|                     |                    |
|                     | /s/ Paul R. Kimmel      |   |
|                     | Paul R. Kimmel          |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExplicitly solvable complex Chebyshev approximation problems related to sine polynomialsExplicitly solvable real Chebyshev approximation problems on the unit interval are typically characterized by simple error curves. A similar principle is presented for complex approximation problems with error curves induced by sine polynomials. As an application, some new explicit formulae for complex best approximations are derived.Document ID19900014691Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsFreund, Roland*(Research Inst. for Advanced Computer Science Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1989Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-181575NAS 1.26:181575RIACS-TR-89.4Accession Number90N24007Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-387Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014691.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 9 4 1 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. E R I N E M A N U E L G U T T I E R E Z

- M A R A D I A G A , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 7 : 1 0

- C R

- 7 5 6

- 1

B e f o r e J O N E S , C h i e f J u d g e , a n d S T E W A R T a n d S O U T H W I C K , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : * T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t E r i n E m a n u e l G u t t i e r e z - M a r a d i a g a h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n

a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. F l o r e s , 6 3 2 F

. 3 d 2 2 9 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 1 1 )

. G u t t i e r e z - M a r a d i a g a h a s n o t f i l e d a

r e s p o n s e
. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f a n d t h e r e l e v a n t p o r t i o n s o f t h e

r e c o r d r e f

l e c t e d t h e r e i n
. W e c o n c u r w i t h c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t t h a t t h e a p p e a l
p r e s e n t s n o n o n f

r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e l l a t e r e v i e w
. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 21 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40941 Document: 00511515600 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2011N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 9 4 1

m o t i o n f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r

r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 10-40941 Document: 00511515600 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2011
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I,Gregory R. Hullinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 9, 2011
#### § 418.16 Using water for power generation.

All use of Project water for power generation must be incidental to releases charged against Project diversions, precautionary drawdown, incentive water (§ 418.35), or spills.
PUBLIC LAW 106–236—JULY 6, 2000 114 STAT. 489

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2460:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 145 (1999): Oct. 12, considered and passed House.

Vol. 146 (2000): June 23, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–236

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States Post Office located at 125 Border Avenue West

in Wiggins, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Jay Hanna ‘Dizzy’ Dean Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States Post Office located at 125 Border Avenue

West in Wiggins, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as

the ‘‘Jay Hanna ‘Dizzy’ Dean Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the post office referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jay

Hanna ‘Dizzy’ Dean Post Office’’.

Approved July 6, 2000.

July 6, 2000

[H.R. 2460]