alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.10

            Assignment of Oil and Gas Working Interest (Right Angle)

                   ASSIGNMENT OF OIL AND GAS WORKING INTEREST



STATE OF ARIZONA

COUNTY OF MARICOPA



          In  consideration  of the  sum  of  One  Hundred  and  no/100  dollars
     ($100.00)  and other good and valuable  consideration,  receipt of which is
     hereby  acknowledged,  Gordon M. LeBlanc,  Jr., an individual,  residing at
     5527 East Camelback Road, Phoenix,  Arizona 85018, as Assignor, does hereby
     assign,  transfer,  sell and  convey a thirty  seven and  one-half  percent
     (37.5%)  working  interest in a certain Oil,  Gas and Mineral  Lease herein
     further described as the Right Angle Prospect,  Sandoval County, New Mexico
     and attached as Exhibit "A". Therefore,  Gordon M. LeBlanc, Jr. does hereby
     assign,  transfer,  sell and convey unto the  following  hereinafter  named
     Assignee in the proportions set opposite each name, to-wit:

                                                          Percentage of Interest

LeBlanc Petroleum, Incorporated                                    37.5%
5527 East Camelback Road
Phoenix, Arizona  85018



          The  working  interest  conveyed  herein  shall  be  paid  to  LeBlanc
     Petroleum,  Inc.,  subject to the net revenue interests provided for in the
     leases set forth in Exhibit "A".

          This  assignment is made without  warranty of title either  express or
     implied.

          This assignment shall be binding upon the Assignor and Assignee, their
     heirs, successors, representatives, executors and assigns.

          This instrument is executed this 29th day of November, 2001.


                                                     Gordon M. LeBlanc, Jr.,
                                                     an individual


                                                    By:/s/Gordon M. LeBlanc, Jr.
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                          Gordon M. LeBlanc, Jr.


                                       1
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and chief executive officer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 11, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES J. BAUMBERGER                                                    
|                     |  |  |  | Name:    James J. Baumberger Title:      President and chief executive officer
§ 3715.0-9 Information collection. ( a ) BLM has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget the information collection requirements contained in this subpart under 44 U.S.C. 3507 and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and assigned clearance number 1004-0169. BLM collects the information so that it may manage use and occupancy of public lands under the mining laws by prohibiting unauthorized uses and occupancies. A response to BLM is mandatory and required to obtain the benefit of occupying the public lands for reasonably incident activities.
( b ) BLM estimates the public reporting burden for this information to average two hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Information Collection Clearance Officer (DW-110), Bureau of Land Management, Building 50, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225-0047, and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 1004-0169, Washington, DC 20503.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 417 368 386

2 414 366 384

3 429 364 382

4 433 362 379

5 445 359 386

6 422 365 388

7 417 365 385

8 420 364 384

9 411 364 384

10 432 353 387

11 415 370 393

12 443 362 401

13 419 379 400

14 417 333 388

15 395 336 373

16 378 310 353

17 361 301 335

18 349 303 328

19 344 312 330

20 354 318 330

21 346 322 331

22 336 302 320

23 342 310 324

24 345 310 323

25 332 263 310

26 344 302 319

27 357 310 325

28 335 299 321

29 338 298 320

30 352 309 327

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Victoria Canal On The Middle River

Run Date: 5/2/2024

April 2024
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-60899-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

PATRICIA NOBLES,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ELECTRIDUCT, INC., et al,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Verified Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and 

Costs [DE 42], and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow [DE 

48]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 48] have been filed, and the time for 

filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s 

factual findings in the Report [DE 48] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this 

opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 

(1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). 

 Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the 

Report [DE 48] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with 

the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusions. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [DE 48] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 

2. Plaintiff’s Verified Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [DE 42] is GRANTED in 

part; 

Case 0:20-cv-60899-WPD Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

3. Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $20,000.00 and costs in the 

amount of $450.00. 

4. This remanded action shall remain CLOSED. Any pending motions are DENIED 

AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 7th day of December, 2020.

Copies to:

Counsel of record

Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow

Case 0:20-cv-60899-WPD Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2020 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22178]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 28, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. Fulton Financial Corporation, Lancaster, Pennsylvania; to merge 
with First Washington Financial Corp., Windsor, New Jersey, and thereby 
indirectly acquire First Washington State Bank, Windsor, New Jersey.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Sue Costello, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Synovus Financial Corp., Columbus, Georgia; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Cohutta Banking Company of Tennessee, 
Chattanooga, Tennessee, a de novo bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 28, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-22178 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
**Exhibit 32.2**





Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A Amendment 1 of M45 Mining
      Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Gilles Ouellette, Secretary/Treasurer and Principal Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the
              Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects,
              the
                financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
                June 27, 2008
            
            /s/Gilles
                OuelletteGilles
                Ouellette
              Secretary/Treasurer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
§ 3809.204 Does this subpart cancel an existing agreement between BLM and a State? ( a ) No, this subpart doesn't cancel a Federal/State agreement or memorandum of understanding in effect on January 20, 2001. A Federal/State agreement or memorandum of understanding will continue while BLM and the State perform a review to determine whether revisions are required under this subpart. BLM and the State must complete the review and make necessary revisions no later than one year from January 20, 2001.
( b ) The BLM State Director may extend the review period described in paragraph (a) of this section for one more year upon the written request of the Governor of the State or the delegated representative of the Governor, and if necessary, for a third year upon another written request. The existing agreement or memorandum of understanding terminates no later than one year after January 20, 2001 if this review and any necessary revision does not occur, unless extended under this paragraph.
( c ) This subpart applies during the review period described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. Where a portion of a Federal/State agreement or memorandum of understanding existing on January 20, 2001 is inconsistent with this subpart, that portion continues in effect until the agreement or memorandum of understanding is revised under this subpart or terminated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          112853
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   494388
<ALLOWANCES>                                     30000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                923299
<PP&E>                                         7053330
<DEPRECIATION>                                  931812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8066526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         20567199
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                         14659
<OTHER-SE>                                  (14509875)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8066526
<SALES>                                        1150164<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1186164
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1614312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7154202
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 30000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1048586<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (7582350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (7546692)<F3>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (7546692)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)
<FN>
<F1>Jukebox lease revenues
<F2>Includes interest charged by jointly controlled company
<F3>Includes net income of $35,658 from jointly controlled company
</FN>


</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDebris/Ice/TPS Assessment and Photographic Analysis for Shuttle Mission STS-38A debris/ice/TPS assessment and photographic analysis was conducted for the Space Shuttle Mission STS-38. Debris inspection of the flight elements and launch pad were performed before and after launch. Ice/frost conditions on the external tank were assessed by the use of computer programs, nomographs, and infrared scanner data during cryogenic loading of the vehicle followed by on-pad visual inspection. High speed photography was analyzed after launch to identify ice/debris sources and evaluate potential vehicle damage and/or in-flight anomalies. The debris/ice/TPS conditions and photographic analysis of Mission STS-38, and their overall effect on the Space Shuttle Program are documented.Document ID19910007800Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHigginbotham, Scott A.*(NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center Cocoa Beach, FL, United States)*Davis, J. Bradley*(NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center Cocoa Beach, FL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1991Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103815NAS 1.15:103815Accession Number91N17113Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007800.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 99.1**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Board of Directors and the Stockholders of Gladstone Capital Corporation: 

We have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of assets andliabilities, including the consolidated****schedules of investments, of Gladstone Capital Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”)****as of September 30, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, changes in net assets and cash flows****for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2019, including the related notes, and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as ofSeptember 30, 2019, and in our report dated November 13, 2019, we expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.****We have also previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (UnitedStates), the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, including the consolidated****schedules of investments, as of September 30, 2017, September 30, 2016, September 30, 2015, September 30, 2014, September 30,2013, September 30, 2012, September 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows****for the years ended September 30, 2016, September 30,2015, September 30, 2014, September 30, 2013, September 30, 2012, September 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010 (none of which are presented herein), and we expressed unqualified opinions on those consolidated financialstatements.****In our opinion, the information set forth in the senior securities table of the Selected Consolidated Financial Data of Gladstone Capital Corporation and its subsidiaries foreach of the ten years in the period ended September 30, 2019, appearing on pages 54-55 in Part II, Item 5 of this Form 10-K, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidatedfinancial statements from which it has been derived. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

McLean, VA 

November 13, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN ADMIRALTY

CASE No.: 20-cv-21696

SILK ROAD TRADING & SHIPPING CO., LTD.,

a Foreign Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WORLD FUEL SERVICES (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD., a 

Foreign Corporation, WORLD FUEL SERVICES 

TRADING DMCC, a Foreign Corporation, and WORLD 

FUEL SERVICES CORPORATION d/b/a WORLD FUEL 

SERVICES MARINE GROUP OF COMPANIES, a Florida 

Corporation. 

Defendants. 

DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

AND DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Jerry D. Hamilton, Esq., David N. Gambach, Esq., and 

Evan S. Gutwein, Esq., and the law firm of Hamilton, Miller, & Birthisel, LLP, hereby appears 

as counsel for Defendants, WORLD FUEL SERVICES (SINGAPORE), PTE LTD, WORLD 

FUEL SERVICES TRADING DMCC and WORLD FUEL SERVICES CORPORATION d/b/a 

WORLD FUEL SERVICES MARINE GROUP OF COMPANIES, and request all pleadings, 

notices, letters and documents in the above-captioned case be served on:

Jerry D. Hamilton, Esq. at jhamilton@hamiltonmillerlaw.com

David N. Gambach, Esq. at dgambach@hamiltonmillerlaw.com

Evan S. Gutwein, Esq. at egutwein@hamiltonmillerlaw.com

Jessica Florin at jflorin@hamiltonmillerlaw.com

Jessica Mendez at jmendez@hmailtonmillerlaw.com

Case 1:20-cv-21696-DPG Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2022 Page 1 of 3
Dated: January 24, 2022 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ David N. Gambach

David N. Gambach, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 8540

Evan S. Gutwein, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 58741

HAMILTON, MILLER & BIRTHISEL, LLP.

150 Southeast Second Avenue, Suite 1200

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone 305-379-3686

Facsimile 305-379-3690

DGambach@HamiltonMillerLaw.com

EGutwein@HamiltonMillerLaw.com

JFlorin@HamiltonMillerLaw.com

JMendez@HamiltonMillerLaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via 

CM-ECF this 24th day of January, 2022 to all parties on the attached Service List. 

/s/ David N. Gambach

David N. Gambach, Esq. 

Case 1:20-cv-21696-DPG Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2022 Page 2 of 3
Service List

Neil Bayer, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 615684

Chase Alexandra Jansson

Florida Bar No. 1002265

Campbell Johnston Clark LLP 

Douglas Centre 

2600 Douglas Road 

Suite 508 

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Tel: 786-204-3784 

Neil@cjclaw.com

Chase@cjclaw.com

Cindy@cjclaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Scott Wagner, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 10244

Wagner Legal Co.

3050 Biscayne Blvd.

Suite 904

Miami, Fla. 33137

Ph. (305) 768-3247

Fax (305) 306-8598

SW@WagnerLegalCo.com

Attorney for Defendants

Case 1:20-cv-21696-DPG Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2022 Page 3 of 3
§ 3934.50 Bona fide purchasers. The BLM will not cancel a lease or an interest in a lease of a purchaser if at the time of purchase the purchaser was not aware and could not have reasonably determined from the BLM records the existence of a violation of any of the following: ( a ) Federal regulatory requirements;
( b ) The Act, as amended; or
( c ) Lease terms and conditions.
#### § 3584.6 Terms of lease.

Leases for hardrock minerals shall issue for a period of 5 years with a preference in the lessee for renewal for a term of 5 years at the end of the initial term and at the end of each 5 year period thereafter (See subpart 3566).