alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A


                                RADAR RESOURCES, INC.
             (exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

         NEVADA                                             87-0434285
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                          Identification Number)

3098 South Highland Drive, Suite 460
Salt Lake City, Utah                                        84106
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (801) 485-7775

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

     The undersigned  registrant  hereby amends the following  items,  financial
statements,  exhibits or other portions of its Form 10-Q dated August 8, 1996 as
set forth in the page attached hereto:

                      Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule




<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                 RADAR RESOURCES, INC.


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ Krista Nielson
                                 Krista Nielson, President, CEO and Director


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ David R. Yeaman
                                 David R. Yeaman, Secretary/Treasurer,
                                                  CFO and Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case Number: 20-22234-CIV-MARTINEZ-BECERRA

LINCO ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

vs.

OLEG FIRER, et al.,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

_____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable Jacqueline Becerra, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for a for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and matters otherwise 

consented to, and for a Report and Recommendation on all dispositive matters not consented to by 

the parties. [ECF Nos. 76, 102]. Magistrate Judge Becerra filed a Report and Recommendation on 

Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, [ECF Nos. 62, 121], recommending the Motion 

be granted in part and denied in part. The Court has reviewed the record and notes that no 

objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is hereby:

ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Becerra’s Report and Recommendation,

[ECF No. 121], is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is:

ADJUDGED that 

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Order that Strikes Certain Affirmative Defenses or Deems 

them to be Denials, [ECF No. 62], is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

2. Defendants’ First, Twentieth, and Twenty-First Affirmative Defenses are 

STRICKEN, and the Seventh, Eleventh, Twelfth, and Eighteenth Affirmative Defenses are 

deemed denials.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 4th day of October, 2021.

____ _______________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-22234-JEM Document 126 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2021 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.350

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 139196 dated February 16, 2016

 

For Rendering

 

Intrazonal communications services

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

Promsvyaz-Invest (Zelenaya Tochka Group)

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1124823007847

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

4826082163

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

9, Kommunalnaya sq., Lipetsk, Lipetsk region, 398059

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until February 16, 2021.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated December 25, 2015 No. 800-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 076039
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. William Kimmond, True Name William Kimond, Respondent.

Order of the County Court, Suffolk County, granting defendant’s application and directing his resentence, where originally he had been sentenced as a second offender, although he had not been indicted as such nor had an information been filed in accordance with section 1943 of the Penal Law, affirmed. The record does not sufficiently establish that the defendant was previously convicted of a felony. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
#### The Fidelity Trust Company of Rochester, as Executor, etc., of Harriet F. Newcomb, Deceased, Respondent, v. Benjamin Hill Smith and Another, Appellants, Impleaded with Another.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the appellants to plead over within twenty days upon payment of the costs of the motion and of this appeal. All concurred.
#### In the Matter of the Application and Petition of John A. Bensel and Others, Constituting the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York, to Acquire Real Estate, etc. Southern Aqueduct Department, Section No. 15. Claim of Kenisco Cemetery.

Appellants’ efforts to settle the record without unnecessary printing, so as to raise the proper questions on appeal, have involved consultations and arrangements with the two other parties, including the corporation counsel of the city of Mew York, so that the delays hitherto are apparently excused. The motion to dismiss the appeal is; therefore, denied, with liberty to renew if the appeal record is not arranged by stipulation or duly settled by Justice Tompkins within a *910reasonable time. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
#### Allen W. Field et al. v. Lincoln Traction Company et al.

Filed September 20, 1905.

No. 13,906.

Taxation: Board oe Equalization: Discretion. The sound discretion reposed in the hoard of equalization in hearing complaints on the valuation of property for assessment under the revenue law in force in 1902 will not be disturbed by this court, unless so manifestly wrong that reasonable minds could not differ thereon.

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Edward P. Holmes, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Allen W. Field*and *Tibbels & Anderson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Ciarle & Allen*and *J. L. Caldwell, contra.*

Oldham, C.

This cause is a proceeding in error from the action of the board of county commissioners of Lancaster county sitting as a board of equalization on the valuation of property of the Lincoln Traction Company, a corporation, for the year 1902. The plaintiff in error filed a protest and objection to the assessment as returned by the assessor. The protest was heard and evidence taken in this and other similar cast's before the county board sitting as a board of equalization, and on such hearing the value of the property for taxation was fixed by the board at $50,-000. Error was prosecuted from this finding to the district court, where the action of the board was affirmed, and to reverse this judgment of the district court error is brought to this court.

The only contention urged in the brief of the plaintiff in error is that, under the testimony taken before the board of equalization, it is grossly inadequate to assess the property of the defendant traction company at $50,000. The evidence was taken in a very informal manner before the *419board of equalization, as is generally tbe case in proceedings of tliis nature before sucb boards. Under the rules governing tbe admission and exclusion of testimony in courts of record, little of tbe evidence offered would have been received. Tbe assessment was made under tbe revnue law in force in 1902, wbicb has been superseded by tbe enactment of 1903, wbicb, it is hoped, will prove much more effective in distributing tbe burdens of taxation in an equitable manner on all classes of property within tbe commonwealth. Under tbe law as it existed in 1902 it ivas tbe peculiar province of tbe board of equalization, in its administrative capacity, to bear and determine complaints of improper valuation made by tbe local assessors, and, unless it is made to appear that tbe judgment of tbe board in fixing tbe valuation on sucb complaints was so clearly wrong that reasonable minds could not differ thereon, tbe sound discretion reposed in tbe board should not be disturbed by a reviewing court. There is no evidence in tbe record before us to say that tbe judgment in tbe case at bar was erroneous in this sense.

We therefore recommend that tbe judgment of tbe district court be affirmed.

Ames and Letton, CC., concur.

By tbe Court: For tbe reasons given in the foregoing opinion, tbe judgment of tbe district court is

Affirmed.
§ 423.38 Operating vessels on Reclamation waters. ( a ) You must comply with Federal, State, and local laws applicable to the operation of a vessel, other watercraft, or seaplane on Reclamation waters, and with any restrictions established by an authorized official.
( b ) You must not operate a vessel, other watercraft, or seaplane in an area closed to the public.
( c ) You must observe restrictions established by signs, buoys, and other regulatory markers.
( d ) You must not operate a vessel, or knowingly allow another person to operate a vessel, in a reckless or negligent manner, or in a manner that endangers or is likely to endanger a person, property, natural resource, or cultural resource.
( e ) You must not operate a vessel when impaired or intoxicated under the standards established by applicable State and local law.
( f ) You must not occupy a vessel overnight, except where otherwise designated under applicable Federal, State, or local law, or where otherwise designated by an authorized official in a special use area.
( g ) You must not use a vessel as a place of habitation or residence.
( h ) You must remove your vessels from Reclamation lands and waters when not in actual use for a period of more than 24 hours, unless they are securely moored or stored at special use areas so designated by an authorized official.
( i ) You must not attach or anchor a vessel to structures such as locks, dams, regulatory or navigational buoys, or other structures not designed for such purpose.
( j ) You must display an international diver down, or inland diving flag in accordance with State and U.S. Coast Guard guidelines when operating a vessel involved in any underwater activities.
( k ) You may engage in towing activities, including, but not limited to, waterskiing and tubing, only during daylight hours and subject to any applicable Federal, State, and local law.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



I, Gary A. Schuman, Chief Financial Officer
of Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc.  (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: August 13, 2012 | /s/ | Gary A. Schuman         | 
|---------------------- | --- | ----------------------- | 
|                       |     | Gary A. Schuman         | 
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
§ 4.625 How will my application be decided? The adjudicative officer must issue a decision on the application promptly after completion of proceedings on the application. The decision must include written findings and conclusions on all of the following that are relevant to the decision: ( a ) Your eligibility and status as a prevailing party;
( b ) The amount awarded, and an explanation of the reasons for any difference between the amount requested and the amount awarded;
( c ) Whether the position of the Department or other agency was substantially justified;
( d ) Whether you unduly protracted the proceedings; and
( e ) Whether special circumstances make an award unjust.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                        10799703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1344306<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    200000
<INVENTORY>                                    2988249
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              16751751
<PP&E>                                         6703705<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3231228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                29914715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6098371
<BONDS>                                        7141256
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         20307136
<PREFERRED>                                      12844
<COMMON>                                         14659
<OTHER-SE>                                    (379730)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  29914715
<SALES>                                        3925380<F3>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3969380<F4>
<CGS>                                          2455396<F5>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3796894<F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2338888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                100000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              268040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2166402)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2166402)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2166402)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowance for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation.
<F3>Includes jukebox sales, leasing, interest and music service revenue.
<F4>Includes $44,000 of advertising revenue
<F5>Includes cost of revenue and direct operating costs.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### § 4300.52 Can other persons use the land in my permit for mineral exploration or production?

Yes. Unless the land is otherwise withdrawn, the land in your permit is subject to lease or leasing under the mineral leasing laws and under the Geothermal Steam Act, and mineral materials disposal under the Materials Act. Also, it can be prospected, located, and purchased under the mining laws and applicable regulations at 43 CFR Group 3800.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF MICHAEL YAMANI


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Neuro-Biotech
Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (“Report”), the undersigned, in
the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
            August
      20, 2010





/s/ Michael
  Yamani


Michael
Yamani


Secretary/Treasurer


Principal
Financial Officer
### §713d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 98–165, §6, Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1066, which related to the tribal constitution and bylaws and election of the tribal governing body, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 23.1



Jaspers + Hall, PC

9175 East Kenyon Avenue, Suite 100

Denver, Colorado 80237

(303) 796-0099





March 26, 2007





U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549





RE: Probe Manufacturing, Inc.  10-KSB



Dear Sir/Madame:



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this report on Form 10-KSB of our report dated March 8, 2007 on our audits of the financial statements of Probe Manufacturing, Inc.s for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and to all references to our firm included in this report on Form 10-KSB.



Sincerely,









/s/ Jaspers + Hall, PC

Jaspers + Hall, PC

Denver, Colorado
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2257]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3190-EM]


Maine; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency for the State of 
Maine (FEMA-3190-EM), dated January 15, 2004, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 26, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Maine is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration 
of January 15, 2004:

    Androscoggin and Washington Counties for emergency protective 
measures (Category B) under the Public Assistance program for a 
period of 48 hours.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster 
Assistance.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-2257 Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### § 49.10 Does this part affect existing authorities?

No. This part preserves the authority of the Secretary of the Interior and the bureaus under this and other laws and regulations to preserve, manage, and protect paleontological resources on Federal land.
2005 

Aircraft 

10.7854 tons PM2,5 

General 19.63854 tons NOX 

2.342928 tons S02 

Marine 

20.430 tons PM2,5 

Port 714.781 tons NOX 

42.146 tons SOZ 

6.370 tons PM2,5 

Underway 223.033 tons NOX 

13.151 tons SOz 

26.800 tons PM2,5 

Total 937.814 tons NOX 

55.297 tons SOZ 

Railroad 

11.850 tons PM2,5 

Yard 390.198 tons NOX 

32.332 tons S02 

37.720 tons PM2,5 

Line Haul - Class 1 1,374.690 tons NOX 

94.444 tons SOz 

49.570 tons P012,5 

Total 1,764.888 tons NOX 

126.777 tons S02
CVPCP FY16 Projects, 4/22/2016

Project Proposed Activity Funding

A-2

Todisco Ranch 

Conservation Project

Sierra Foothill Conservancy

Conservation easement on 480 acres 

on the Todisco Ranch located 

southeast of Eastman Lake to protect 

grassland, vernal pools, and oak 

woodland habitats and benefit CA tiger 

salamander, vernal pool fairy shrimp, 

vernal pool tadpole shrimp, valley 

elderberry longhorn beetle, hairy orcutt 

grass, and succulent owl’s clover in 

Madera County.

$480,000

(Note: The HRP 

is contributing 

$23,000 for a 

total of 

$480,000)

A-5

Conserving Critical 

California Tiger Salamander 

Habitat in the Dunnigan Hills

The Yolo Habitat 

Conservancy

Conservation easement on 627 acres in 

the Dunnigan Hills to protect contiguous 

grassland habitat and multiple pond 

sites for the CA tiger salamander in 

Yolo County.

$500,000

(Note: The HRP 

is contributing 

$314,000 for a 

total of 

$814,000)

S-3

Longhorn Fairy Shrimp 

Habitat Research in Contra 

Costa and Alameda 

Counties, California

East Bay Regional Park 

District

Main objectives: (1) compile, review, 

and analyze available species 

documentation; (2) remotely analyze 

documented LHFS occurrences to 

identify spatial patterns and habitat 

parameters, and extrapolate to identify 

potential unknown occurrences and 

reintroduction sites; (3) obtain access to 

rock outcrop vernal pool habitat on 

public and private lands (4) conduct 

dry-season field surveys of documented 

and potentially suitable LHFS habitats; 

(5) analyze soil sample cyst banks for 

presence and abundance of 

Branchinecta species and the 

invertebrate community as a whole; (6) 

conduct wet-season field surveys of 

known LHFS occurrences and pools 

within rock outcrops to determine 

habitat; and (7) analyze all compiled 

data sets within known LHFS 

populations to develop habitat 

restoration methods.

$121,692
Project Proposed Activity Funding

2016 Allocation $1,492,000

Project Costs Total $1,078,692

Funds to Prior Year 

Projects 

$70,000

Program Administration & 

Overhead Costs Total

$343,308