alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5553. Supervision of premises and operations

#### (a) Assignment of internal revenue officers

The Secretary is authorized to assign to any premises established under the provisions of this chapter such number of internal revenue officers as may be deemed necessary.

#### (b) Functions of internal revenue officer

When used in this chapter, the term "internal revenue officer assigned to the premises" means the internal revenue officer assigned by the Secretary to duties at premises established and operated under the provisions of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1395; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5553, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 681, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

For application to vinegar plants of provisions of prior section 5553(a) relating to assignment of storekeeper-gaugers, see also section 5505(f) of this title.

#### Amendments

1976—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.
#### § 46.145 Using adaptive management.

Bureaus should use adaptive management, as appropriate, particularly in circumstances where long-term impacts may be uncertain and future monitoring will be needed to make adjustments in subsequent implementation decisions. The NEPA analysis conducted in the context of an adaptive management approach should identify the range of management options that may be taken in response to the results of monitoring and should analyze the effects of such options. The environmental effects of any adaptive management strategy must be evaluated in this or subsequent NEPA analysis.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, David
Bakhshi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of Latin American Telecommunications Venture Company on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended February 28, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Latin American
Telecommunications Venture Company.




By:
                  /s/ David
      BakhshiName:
                  David
      BakhshiTitle:
                  CEO
      and Principal Executive OfficerApril
      19, 2010
# Uradni list C 278A/11.

| | ISSN 1725-5244 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 278A |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 4811. november 2005 |

ISSN 1725-5244

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 278A

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 4811. november 2005

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Objave |
| | Svet |
| 2005/C 278A/1 | Razpis prostega delovnega mesta strokovnega sodelavca – Sklic: Svet/B/025 | 1 |
| | Evropska centralna banka |
| 2005/C 278A/2 | Prosto delovno mesto v generalnem direktoratu Pravna služba – Namestnik generalnega direktorja Pravne službe | 2 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

III   Objave

Svet

2005/C 278A/1

Razpis prostega delovnega mesta strokovnega sodelavca – Sklic: Svet/B/025

1

Evropska centralna banka

2005/C 278A/2

Prosto delovno mesto v generalnem direktoratu Pravna služba – Namestnik generalnega direktorja Pravne službe

2

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

III Objave

Svet

| 11.11.2005 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CA 278/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2005

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CA 278/1

---

RAZPIS PROSTEGA DELOVNEGA MESTA STROKOVNEGA SODELAVCA

Sklic: Svet/B/025

(2005/C 278 A/01)

Generalni sekretariat Sveta Evropske unije objavlja razpis za začasna delovna mesta:

| — | dveh delovnih mest kategorije B*, razred 3 (AST 3) – Svet/B/025 |
| --- | --- |

—

dveh delovnih mest kategorije B*, razred 3 (AST 3) – Svet/B/025

v Službi za varnost misij Varnostnega urada.

Dodatne informacije so na voljo v službi za zaposlovanje na naslednjem elektronskem naslovu:

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

ali na spletni strani te službe:

http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Rok za oddajo vlog: 2. december 2005, pri čemer se upošteva datum poštnega žiga.

---

Evropska centralna banka

| 11.11.2005 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CA 278/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2005

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CA 278/2

---

PROSTO DELOVNO MESTO V GENERALNEM DIREKTORATU PRAVNA SLUŽBA

Namestnik generalnega direktorja Pravne službe

(2005/C 278 A/02)

Evropska centralna banka objavlja prosto delovno mesto namestnika generalnega direktorja generalnega direktorata Pravna služba. Razpisni pogoji in opis delovnega mesta ter navodila za prijavo so objavljeni na spletni strani ECB na naslovu www.ecb.int (povezava „Job opportunities“).

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Gerry, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2007 |  |  |  |                                         
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ Robert L. Gerry, III                
|                        |  |  |  | Robert L. Gerry, Chief Executive Officer
(No. 767

Claimant awarded $2000.00.)

#### Edgar Collard, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1925.*

Military *service*— when *State liable for injury sustained by soldier.*Claimant was injured while in the discharge of his duty, as a corporal of the Illinois National Guard, under orders of his superior officer, *Seld*— He is entitled to an award.

Workman’s compensation *act*— award *may be fixed under provisions of.*The provisions of the Workman’s Compensation Act may be taken into consideration by the court in fixing an award in cases of this character.

McLaughlin *&*Billman, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant is a young man 21 years old, unmarried, and it appears that there is dependent upon him for support his widowed mother and four minor brothers and sisters, and that the family is in needy circumstances.

Prior to and on September 2, 1923, the claimant'was a member of the service company, 130th Infantry, Illinois National Guard, with the rank of corporal.

On the date mentioned he was a member on the detail of six men who were directed to engage in collecting in a truck dry garbage about the camp.

As Corporal Collard was climbing upon the step of the truck, it moved forward, crushing him between the truck and a telephone pole, and caused injury, which is the base of his claim.

There appears to be no contention on behalf of the State as to the fact of the occurrence of the accident or the fact that it occurred while the claimant was in line of duty, the only contention being the extent of the damages of injury sustained by the claimant.

It appears that the claimant suffered a fracture of the left femur at the junction of the middle and upper third, and it is further claimed that the fractured bones made a union in malposition, with .an overriding of the fragments, causing an anterior-posterior deformity, causing, it is claimed, a shortening of the left leg and impairment of function characterized in a limp.

*88It appears that the injury caused the claimant and is causing him considerable pain and discomfort.

In making allowance in this case, the court, in following its precedent in other cases of this character where employees were injured while in various employment in behalf of the State, and that considering the Workmen’s Compensation Act, it appears to the court that there is not more than 50% disability, but -the court wishes to also consider the medical requirements that might be necessary for the aid of the claimant and will have that in mind in malting an allowance.

It is considered by the court that an allowance of $2000.00 be recommended.
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 1 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 2 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 3 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 4 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 5 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 6 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 7 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 8 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 9 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 10 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 11 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 12 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 13 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 14 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 15 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 16 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 17 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 18 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 19 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 20 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 21 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 22 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 23 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 24 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 25 of 26
Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 26 of 26
Exhibit 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Integrated Surgical
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David H. Adams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ David H. Adams
---------------------------------------

David H. Adams, Chief Financial Officer

April 13, 2007
#### § 413.5 Reports on status of settlement lands.

The Project Manager will furnish each district prior to its annual levy every year a list of all the settlement lands owned by the United States for which water is available and which are not under contract of sale or exchange and therefore are not to be assessed by the district, except for construction charge obligation installments under § 413.3(c) when such charges are required to be levied.
#### Daniel J. Leary, Appellant, v. Gus Sandblom, Respondent.

Judgement affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
**Biotechnology for the 21st Century: New Horizons**

**A Report from the Biotechnology Research SubcommitteeCommittee on Fundamental ScienceNational Science and Technology Council July 1995**

Preface Foreword from John Gibbons, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy
- Committee on Fundamental Science  - Members   Biotechnology Research Subcommittee - Members, Contributors
About the National Science and Technology Council and the Office of Science and Technology PolicyComplete Table of ContentsExecutive SummaryIntro.|Agriculture|Environment|Bioprocessing/Biomanufacturing|Marine/Aquaculture|Infrastructure

Print copies of this document are for sale by the U.S. Government Printing OfficeSuperintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC  20402-9328Stock Number 038-000-00590-1This electronic document has been prepared by Biotechnology Information Center, National Agricultural Library, USDA/ARS.
#### § 2911.0-3 Authority.

The Act of May 24, 1928, as amended (49 U.S.C. Appendix, 211-213), authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to lease for use as a public airport, any contiguous unreserved and unappropriated public lands not to exceed 2,560 acres in area.
Attachment 006 -- Process Flow Charts and Notes — Sites Controlled by Others

Materials Redacted --- Confidential Business Information
#### Sylvia Smith, Respondent, v. Harry Smith, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of E Med Future, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                      |  |                        
|------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ D. Dane Donohue                   |  | /s/ Donald Sullivan    
|D. Dane Donohue                       |  | Donald Sullivan        
|PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Date: May 16, 2005
#### Craft *et al. v.*Link.

December 15, 1910.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Brand. Clarke superior court. April 11, 1910.

*E. O. Kinnebfew,*for plaintiffs.

*Max Michael*and *W. M. Smith,*for defendant.

Atkinson, J.

1. This was a suit to enjoin the defendant from exercising a power of sale contained Jn a deed to secure debt, executed by the plaintiffs. The ground relied upon to enjoin the sale was that the contract was usurious and fraudulent. Upon these questions the pleadings made issues, and the evidence upon them was conflicting. At the interlocutory hearing the judge declined to grant an ad interim injunction against the defendant, but ordered that if he elected to proceed with the sale the proceeds should be held subject to the further order of the court. In accordance with the prayers of the cross-petition the order further provided that the plaintiff's be restrained and enjoined from interfering, directly or indirectly, with the defendant in the exercise by him of the power of sale contained in the deed. The plaintiffs excepted. *Held:*

(a) The plaintiffs did not offer to do equity by paying the money admitted to be due under the deed to secure debt, the evidence was conflicting as to the existence of usury, and there was no abuse of discretion'in refus- • ing to-enjoin the defendant.

(Z>) In such a case the presiding judge erred in granting an injunction against the plaintiffs merely on application in the answer of the defendant, with no showing of any impending restrainable act by plaintiffs, the result of which order was to restrain the plaintiffs from tendering • the amount admitted by them to be due and resisting payment of the balance, or exercising any legal mode of asserting the rights claimed by them. *Ray*v. *Anderson,*125 *Ga.*502-509 (54 S. E. 356).

(c) It was not sufficient to merely order that the proceeds of sale be held subject to the further order of court.

Judgment *affirmed,*in so far as it denied the injunction sought by the plaintiffs, but *reversed*in so far as it enjoined the plaintiffs.

*All the Justices concur.*
### **Subchapter A—Interest on Underpayments**

Sec.
6601.
Interest on underpayment, nonpayment, or extensions of time for payment, of tax.
6602.
Interest on erroneous refund recoverable by suit.
6603.
Deposits made to suspend running of interest on potential underpayments, etc.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §842(b), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1599, added item 6603.
Exhibit 4.341

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 133869 dated October 31, 2015

 

For Rendering

 

Local telephone communication services, excluding local telephone communication services using coin-box telephones and public access services

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

Promsvyaz-Invest (Zelenaya Tochka Group)

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1124823007847

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

4826082163

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

9, Kommunalnaya sq., Lipetsk, Lipetsk region, 398059

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until October 31, 2020.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated July 21, 2015 No. 469-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR   SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 070646
§ 3830.24 How do I make payments? ( a ) You or your representative may bring payments to the BLM State Office by close of business on or before the due date.
( b ) If you use a credit card— ( 1 ) On or before the due date, you must send or fax a written authorization, bearing your signature; or
( 2 ) You may authorize BLM to use your credit card by telephone if you can satisfactorily establish your identity.
( c ) You may send payments using a *bona fide* mail delivery service. ( 1 ) The payment must be postmarked or clearly identified by the mail delivery service as being sent on or before the due date; and
( 2 ) The BLM State Office must receive the payment no later than 15 calendar days after the due date.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Isaac Fishback, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Queens County, convicting defendant of the crimes of conspiracy to commit an abortion and conspiracy to commit an act injurious to the public health and morals, reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. The findings of fact implicit in the verdict of the jury are affirmed. No evidence was adduced to support the court’s charge that the defendant’s examination of the victim on March 22, 1946, might be considered as an overt act; nor could the defendant’s signing of the death certificate of the victim be considered as such, as charged, insofar as the alleged conspiracy to commit an abortion is concerned. The conversation between the victim and her sister prior to the alleged abortion, in which the victim narrated the fact of her condition and her plans, was not in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy. Consequently, the sister’s testimony relating the conversation was improperly *915admitted in evidence. Cross-examination of one of the People’s witnesses, who had been excluded by the court from the courtroom during the trial, concerning disclosures to the witness of testimony given during her exclusion, should have been allowed. The prosecutor’s offer of the entire grand jury minutes of the testimony of a witness in evidence after the court, in the jury’s absence, had allowed defendant’s counsel only a partial and limited examination of such minutes, was prejudicial to the defendant. Exclusion of evidence of the knowledge of the People’s chief witness, a confessed coconspirator and accomplice, that she was subject to imprisonment on a pending charge of operating a hospital without a permit, considered in conjunction with the foregoing errors, is further ground for reversal. Order denying defendant’s motion for inspection of the grand jury minutes or, in the alternative, for dismissal of the indictments, affirmed. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
§ 44.52 May a State enact legislation to reallocate or redistribute PILT payments? A State may enact legislation to reallocate or redistribute PILT payments. If a State enacts legislation, it must: ( a ) Notify the Department if the legislation requires reallocating or redistributing payments to smaller units of general local government (see 31 U.S.C. 6907);
( b ) Provide the Department a copy of the legislation within 60 days of enactment;
( c ) Provide the name and address of the State government office to which the Department should send the payment;
( d ) Distribute funds to its smaller units of general local government within 30 days of receiving the payment; and
( e ) Not reduce the payment made to smaller units of general local government to pay the cost of State legislation which reallocates or redistributes payments.
#### § 4110.4-1 Additional land acreage.

When lands outside designated allotments become available for livestock grazing under the administration of the Bureau of Land Management, the forage available for livestock shall be made available to qualified applicants at the discretion of the authorized officer. Grazing use shall be apportioned under § 4130.1-2 of this title.

[53 FR 10234, Mar. 29, 1988]