alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

III Teatised

Nõukogu

----

TEADE VABADE AMETIKOHTADE KOHTA: ASSISTENT

Viide: nõukogu/B/025

(2005/C 278 A/01)

Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu peasekretariaat otsib ajutisi töötajaid:

julgeolekubüroo missioonide kaitse osakonda.

Lisateavet on võimalik saada personali valiku ja töölevõtu osakonnast e-posti aadressil:

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

või veebilehelt:

http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Tähtaeg: 2. detsember 2005, postitamise kuupäeva tõendab postitempel.

----

Euroopa Keskpank

----

VABA AMETIKOHT ÕIGUSTEENUSTE PEADIREKTORAADIS

Õigusteenuste peadirektoraadi peadirektori asetäitja

(2005/C 278 A/02)

Euroopa Keskpank kuulutab välja konkursi õigusteenuste peadirektoraadi peadirektori asetäitja ametikoha täitmiseks. Lisateave nõutava kvalifikatsiooni, tööülesannete ja konkursi kohta on kättesaadav EKP kodulehel aadressil www.ecb.int (“Job opportunities”).

----
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 195 / Friday, October 8, 2004 / Notices 60373

[FR Doc. 04–22689 Filed 10–7–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 04–38] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/OPS–ADMIN, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 04–38 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: October 4, 2004. 

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M

60374 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 195 / Friday, October 8, 2004 / Notices 


EN08OC04.038</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 195 / Friday, October 8, 2004 / Notices 60375


EN08OC04.039</GPH>
60376 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 195 / Friday, October 8, 2004 / Notices 


EN08OC04.040</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 195 / Friday, October 8, 2004 / Notices 60377

[FR Doc. 04–22690 Filed 10–7–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 04–39] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/OPS–ADMIN, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 04–39 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: October 4, 2004. 

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M


EN08OC04.041</GPH>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7199

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CELSO CERVANTES-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, 

Chief District Judge. (7:03-cr-00075-FL-2)

Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Celso Cervantes-Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Celso Cervantes-Hernandez seeks to appeal his 

conviction and sentence. In criminal cases where judgment was 

entered prior to December 1, 2009, the defendant must file a

notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a 

showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court 

may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of 

appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 

759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered judgment on

February 19, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed more than six 

years later on August 26, 2010. Because Cervantes-Hernandez

failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an 

extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 2:20-cv-14144-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2020 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:20-cv-14144-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2020 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:20-cv-14144-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2020 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:20-cv-14144-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2020 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:20-cv-14144-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2020 Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 11, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    WILLIS H. NEWTON, JR.                                                                    
|                     |  |  |  | Name:    Willis H. Newton, Jr. Title:      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
"Wood, Allison"

<awood@hunton.com>

03/18/2013 04:29 PM To Bob Perciasepe/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

cc Group A-AND-R-DOCKET@EPA

bcc

Subject EPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-04292: Petition for

Reconsideration and Request for an Administrative Stay

1 attachment

PM NAAQS Petition for Reconsideration-c.pd f Petition Reconsideration-c.pd

Dear Acting Administrator Perciasepe,

Attached is a Petition for Reconsideration and Request for an Administrative Stay of EPA’s “National

Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter,” which was published at 78 Fed. Reg. 3086 on

January 15, 2013. This petition is being filed pursuant to section 307(b)(7)(B) of the Clean Air Act by the

following parties: American Forest & Paper Association; American Iron and Steel institute; American

Petroleum Institute; American Wood Council; Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America;

Corn Refiners Association; Council of Industrial Boiler Owners; National Oilseed Processors Association;

and Utility Air Regulatory Group. The original petition is being sent to you by overnight delivery.

If you have any questions regarding the petition, please contact me.

Sincerely,

Allison D. Wood

Allison Wood

Partner

awood@hunton.com

Hunton & Williams LLP

2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20037

Phone: (202) 955-1945

Fax: (202) 828-3739

www.hunton.com
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frank Ellsworth, Respondent, against Vossler Bros. et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
#### § 30.505 How must minors or other legal incompetents be represented?

Minors and other legal incompetents who are interested parties must be represented by legally appointed guardians, or by guardians ad litem appointed by the judge. In appropriate cases, the judge may order the payment of fees to the guardian ad litem from the assets of the estate.

[73 FR 67289, Nov. 13, 2008. Redesignated at 86 FR 72089, Dec. 20, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        10
<OTHER-SE>                      (10)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-BASIC>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
### PART VII—BASE EROSION AND ANTI-ABUSE TAX

Sec.
59A.
Tax on base erosion payments of taxpayers with substantial gross receipts.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part VII, Environmental Tax, consisted of section 59A, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §221(a)(12)(A), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4038.
EXHIBIT 9

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 1 of 6
Filing # 107022334 E-Filed 05/04/2020 02:40:48 PM Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 6 of 6
#### § 3503.32 How should I describe acquired lands?

You may describe acquired lands by metes and bounds, or you may also use the description shown on the deed or other document that conveyed title to the United States. If you are applying for less than the entire tract acquired by the United States, describe the land using courses and distances tied to a point on the boundary of the requested tract. Where the acquiring agency assigned a tract number to the identical tract you wish to permit or lease, you may describe those lands by the tract number and include a map which clearly shows the lands with respect to the administrative unit or the project of which they are a part. In States outside of the public land survey system, you should describe the lands by tract number, and include a map.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A


                               CETACEAN INDUSTRIES, INC.
             (exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

         NEVADA                                             87-0438633
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                          Identification Number)

3098 South Highland Drive, Suite 460
Salt Lake City, Utah                                        84106
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (801) 485-7775

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

     The undersigned  registrant  hereby amends the following  items,  financial
statements,  exhibits or other portions of its Form 10-Q dated August 8, 1996 as
set forth in the page attached hereto:

                      Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule




<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                 CETACEAN INDUSTRIES, INC.


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ Krista Nielson
                                 Krista Nielson, President, CEO and Director


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ David R. Yeaman
                                 David R. Yeaman, Secretary/Treasurer,
                                                  CFO and Director
§ 3809.200 What kinds of agreements may BLM and a State make under this subpart? To prevent unnecessary administrative delay and to avoid duplication of administration and enforcement, BLM and a State may make the following kinds of agreements: ( a ) An agreement to provide for a joint Federal/State program; and
( b ) An agreement under § 3809.202 which provides that, in place of BLM administration, BLM defers to State administration of some or all of the requirements of this subpart subject to the limitations in § 3809.203.
Required Contractor Information Bureau of Reclamation Use Only

Contractor Name: Date Payment Received:

Contract Number: Deposit Number

Payment Amount: Payment Method

Check Number

Prepared by/Date Prepared BD Number

Preparer's Phone

Preparer's email:

Water Payments

FDSA 

Period 

Paid for 

MM/YY

Acre/

Feet

Rate Per 

Acre/Foot Total

Summary 

Total

Contract Payment $ -

Transfer Payment $ -

Reschedule (Carry Over) Payment $ -

Credits from Prior Period $ -

Total $ - $ - 

Restoration Charge - IRR

Restoration Charge - M&I

M&I to IRR Transfer Charges

Tier 2 Charges (80%<90%)

Tier 3 Charges (90%-100%)

M&I Surcharge

Friant Surcharge - IRR

Friant Surcharge - M&I

 $ - 

Trinity PUD

$ 0.05 $ - $ -

Credits from Prior Period

Total $ - 

PAYMENT RECAP TOTAL $ - $ -

Mail Remittance to: Wire Transfer Remittance to: Send Copy to:

Please reference the bill number.

Bureau of Reclamation EFT (Fedwire) Repayment Specialist:

Mid-Pacific Region ABA No. (Routing No.) 021030004

P.O. Box 301502 ALC 14060905

Los Angeles, CA 90030-1502 Fed Wire Bank Location Area Office:

Federal Reserve Bank of New York

33 Liberty St. New York, NY 10045

Trinity PUD Assessment

DAR Number

 Single Contract Payment Recap

Restoration Fund Payments 

(Required by CVPIA, Public Law 102-575)

Total

Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF



THE UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Alfred R. Camner, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Humberto L. Lopez, Chief Financial Officer, of BankUnited Financial Corporation, a Florida corporation (the
Company), each hereby certifies that:



|(1) | The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  |  |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                        |  | 
|/s/ Alfred R. Camner    |  |  |  | /s/ Humberto L. Lopez  
|Alfred R. Camner        |  |  |  | Humberto L. Lopez      
|                        |  | 
|Dated: August 9, 2006   |  |  |  | Dated: August 9, 2006
§ 429.22 Can Reclamation charge me additional administrative costs after I receive a use authorization? ( a ) After you receive your use authorization, Reclamation may charge you for additional administrative costs incurred for activities such as: ( 1 ) Monitoring your authorized use over time to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of your use authorization; and
( 2 ) Periodic analysis of your long-term use to adjust your use fee to reflect current conditions.
( b ) If your additional payment is not received by Reclamation within 90 days after notification to you in writing of the additional administrative costs, Reclamation may take action to terminate your use authorization.
§ 3435.3-7 Consultation with the Attorney General. In any exchange which, if consummated, shall result in the issuance of a Federal coal lease, the Secretary, after issuing an exchange notice under § 3435.3-1 of this title and before issuance of a written decision under § 3435.4 of this title. ( a ) Shall require the lessee or lease applicant to submit the information in § 3422.3-4 of this title; and
( b ) If the Attorney General, within 30 days, objects to lease issuance, shall not issue the exchange lease except after complying with the provisions of § 3422.3-4(f)(2) of this title.
#### Mary Louisa Campion, Appellant, v. The Roman Catholic Orphan Asylum in the City of New York, Respondent, Impleaded with Others. (Action No. 2.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael J. Tomczak, Chief Financial Officer of Integrated Surgical Systems,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
          September 30, 2009, which this certification accompanies (the
          "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

 Dated: November 10, 2009                      /s/ Michael J. Tomczak
                                               ---------------------------
                                                   Michael J. Tomczak
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
### 1

VIA FDMS
February 29 , 2016
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Caterpillar Inc.

– Second Petition to Amend Exemption No. 12372 in Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1955

Dear Sir or Madam:

Caterpillar Inc. was grante d Exemption No. 12372 in Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1955 , authorizing the operat ion of several models of UAS for commercial purposes

. Caterpillar Inc. is the parent company to a number of wholly owned subsidiaries , through which it conducts many of its commercial activities

. Caterpillar desires to conduct commercial drone operations through its subsidiaries, but a s Exemption No. 12372 only names Caterpillar Inc. as a grantee, I write now to request that the Agency amend this e xemption to :

(1) name Caterpillar and its wholly owned subsidiaries as grantees;

(2) authorize Caterpillar and its wholly owned subsidiaries to operate the Microdrones M D 4

- 200 and MD 4

- 1000

. Both of these UAS are comparable in type, size, weight, speed, and operating capabilities to the UAS whose operations were authorized by the original grant. The agency has already determined that these aircraft meet the conditions of Section 333, and has already authorized other petitioners to operate the m in exemptions including Exemptions number 11171A, 11713, 12496, 12646, 12791, and 13650

.
The public int erest and safety reasons that formed the basis for the FAA granting the original exemption are unchanged, and a ll subsidiaries will comply fully with all terms and conditions imposed by Exemption No. 12372

. T he FAA has granted numerous concurrent exemptions to parent companies and their subsidiaries, so the requested amendment would not set any precedent or raise any new issues . W e therefore respectfully request that the FAA issue a summary grant of this petition

. We will be happy to provide any f urther information that may be needed.
Please direct communications concerning this petition to myself at the below address or to : Leah Green Caterpillar Inc. 100 NE Adams Street Peoria, IL 61629 Ph: 256

- 505

- 6567 Email: green_leah@cat.com

Very truly yours,
Gregory N. Harris Caterpillar Inc. 100 NE Adams Street Peoria, IL 61629
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 24

- 00013

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 467th District Court Denton C ounty, Texas Trial Court No. 21

- 11159

- 467
Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### K HODR 

### S AFA 

### , Appellant

V



### . L OUDY 

### T AMER 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On February 8, 2024, we notified appellant that the trial

- court clerk responsible for preparing the record i n this appeal ha d informed us that appellant ha d not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our noti ce, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, by Febru ary 20, 2024 , appellant arranged to pay for the clerk’s record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b),
44.3

. Because appellant has not m ade payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, we now dismiss the appeal for wan t of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered : March 14 , 2024
§ 3501.2 What is the scope of this part? ( a ) This part applies to minerals other than oil, gas, coal and oil shale, leased under the mineral leasing acts, and to hardrock minerals leasable under Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1946, on any unclaimed, undeveloped area of available public domain or acquired lands where leasing of these specific minerals is allowed by law. Special areas identified in part 3580 of this title and asphalt on certain lands in Oklahoma also are leased under this part. Check part 3580 to identify any special provisions that apply to those special areas.
( b ) This part does not apply to Indian lands or minerals except where expressly noted.