alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dr. Henry A. Holle

Commissioner of Health State Department of Health Austin, Texas

Dear Dr. Holle: OpinionNo. W-194 Re: Authority of a City Health Officer to assist in enforcing the provisionsof House Bill 194,Acts of the 55th Legislature,R.S. 1957. This opinion Is In response to your letter of June 27, 1957 inwhich you present the followingquestions,regarding House Bill 194, enactedby the 55th Legislature,Regular Session, 1957:

1. 'Is there any provision inHouse Bill 194 which would prohibit a city health officer from taking action against any personviolating this lawwithin the city health officer's jurisdictionprovided the complaint was filed in county court since the maximum penaltyremoves jurisdictionfrom corporation and justice courts? 2. 'Is there any provision **in** House Bill 194 which would prohibit a city health officer from enforcing this law in his jurisdiction and prosecutingviolations in corporation court if the maximum penaltywere $200.00 with no provision for imprisonment%'" You are advised that both of the questionsyou ask are answered in the negative.

Article 4430,Vernon's Civil Statutes, provides that the city health officer shall fully cooperatewith the State Department of Health and city health officers shall discharge and perform such duties as may be prescribed for him under the directions,rules, regulations and requirements of the State Department of Health and the Commissioner of Health.

Article 4430, Vernon's Civil Statutes, also provides that the city health officer shall aid the State Department of Health at all times in the enforcementof properrules, regulations and requirements in the enforcement of all sanitaTyDr. Henry A. Holle, page 2. 

### (w-194)

laws, quarantine regulationsand vital statistics collection, and perform such other duties as the State Health Department shall direct.

Subdivision (a), Section 

### 5 of House Bill 194, states: "ThisAct shall be enforcedby the Commissioner of Heath of the State of Texas.” Under the provision of Article 4430,Vernon's Civil Statutes, the Commissioner of Health may call upon the city health officer to aid in the enforcementof House Bill 194.

There Is no provision in House Bill 194which would prohibit a city health officer from taking action against any personviolating said lawwithin the city health officer's jurisdiction if called upon by Commissioner of Health to do so. SUMMARY The city health officerhas authority to take action against any person violatingHouse Bill 194within the city health officer's jurisdictionIf called upon by Commissioner of Health to do so. Very trulyyours, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas

MRT:wam:zt APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE H. Grady Chandler,Chairman C. E. Richards John Lennan MarvinR. Thomas, Jr. REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Geo. P. Blackburn B MarvinR. Thomas, Jr. Assistant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 20-cv-21979-ALTONAGA/Goodman

MIKE ELBERT NEAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNIT OFFICER DELMAN LUMPKINS, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

STATUS REPORT REGARDING

STATE CRIMINAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS

On June 23, 2020, this Court entered an Order [ECF No. 27] granting Chief Lawrence’s 

Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of State Criminal and Administrative 

Investigations [ECF No. 16]. In the Order, the Court temporarily stayed and administratively 

closed this case pending completion of the related Miami-Dade County State Attorney’s Office 

and the Security and Internal Affairs Bureau of the Miami-Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation 

Department investigations. See Order at 5. The Court also directed the parties to submit a joint

status report every sixty (60) days advising the Court of the progress of those investigations. See 

id.

As of today, these investigationsremain open and pending. The parties will notify the Court 

of any known changes in the status of the criminal case should any occur before the next status 

report is due.

Dated: August 20, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

GERALDINE BONZON-KEENAN

Miami-Dade County Attorney

Stephen P. Clark Center

111 NW 1st Street, Suite 2810

Miami, Florida 33128

Case 1:20-cv-21979-CMA Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

By: s/ Anita Viciana

Anita Viciana

Assistant County Attorney

Florida Bar No. 115838

e-mail: anita@miamidade.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 20, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing document with 

the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served 

this day on all counsel of record via CM/ECF and on Plaintiff, who is now pro se, via U.S. Mail

at the address provided by Plaintiff in his most recent filing: 365 NW 8th Street, Apt. 211, Miami, 

FL 33136.

s/ Anita Viciana

Assistant County Attorney

Case 1:20-cv-21979-CMA Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2021 Page 2 of 2
#### § 41.100 Purpose and effective date.

The purpose of these Title IX regulations is to effectuate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (except sections 904 and 906 of those Amendments) (20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1683, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688), which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in these Title IX regulations. The effective date of these Title IX regulations shall be September 29, 2000.
272 West Central Avenue ♦ Springboro, OH ♦ 45066

NMLS 126841 Phone: (937) 748

- 8888 ♦ Fax: (937) 748

- 9358 ♦ Toll Free: (888) 305

- 2342 MB.802955.000 UAS Safety & Flight Operating Procedures

1) Confirm any proposed operation conforms to the FAA Exemption

2) Confirm any proposed operation conforms to the ATO COA

3) Verify PIC has commercial pilot certificate and valid 3 rd class medical certificate

4) Verify PIC has met currency requirements

5) File NOTAM between 48

- 72 hours of planned flight operation

6) Confirm all operating and exemption documents are available and onsite during flight

operations

7) O btain a weather briefing for the area of operations

8) Obtain written permission from any property owners affected by the flight operation

9) Visually review the area of flight operations for potential hazards to flight, property or

persons

10) Preflight the aircra ft in accordance with the manufacturers’ operating documents

11) Confirm batteries are charged to 100% of capacity

12) Monitor flight operations to assure altitude restrictions are adhered to

13) Monitor flight operations to assure required distance of UAS from proper ty, vessels, and

people are maintained at all times

14) Assure all flight operations are terminated with mandated power reserves

15) Log required flight time, exceptions to flight and any maintenance issues

This document may be amended from time to time as required by the FAA, changes in operating

procedures or manufacturers’ operating instructions.

Dennis M. Fisher

President
Exhibit
32.1 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, David
Bakhshi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Latin American Telecommunications Venture Company-LATVCO on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended February 28, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Latin American
Telecommunications Venture Company-LATVCO.





By: /s/
David Bakhshi


Name:
David Bakhshi


Title:
Chief Executive Officer





April 20,
2009
EXHIBIT
3(i)(3)



[Nevada Secretary of State Logo]



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390)



Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

For Nevada Profit Corporations

(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390
 After Issuance of Stock)

 Remit in Duplicate 



1.    Name of corporation:  MICRO-ECONOMICS, INC.



2.    The articles have been amended as follows (provide
article numbers, if available):



ARTICLE I



NAME



The name of the Corporation is E MED FUTURE, INC.



3.    The vote by which the stockholders
holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation have voted
in favor of the amendment is:  960,400



4.    Officer Signature (Required):





|/s/  KRISTA NIELSON |  | April 2, 2003
|------------------- |  | -------------



If any proposed
amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote. In addition to the affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders
of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.



IMPORTANT:  Failure to include any of the above information and remit the proper fees may cause this filing to be
rejected.
Exhibit 4.346

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 135051 dated October 05, 2015

 

For Rendering

 

Data transmission services, except for data transmission services for the purpose of voice transmission

 

This License is granted to

 

Limited Liability Company

 

Communication systems (Zelenaya Tochka Group)

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1026801161639

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

6831017477

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

211 r., 16, Internacionalnaya str., Tambov, Tambov region, 392000

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until October 05, 2020.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated August 28, 2015 No. 580-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ O.A.   Ivanov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp here
    	
 
    
	
Official   seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND   MASS
   COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN   FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
   IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF   COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION
   TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 071828
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                                  CERTIFICATION

                          Chase Credit Card Owner Trust
                           Series 2001-3 (the "Trust")

I, Patricia M. Garvey, a vice president in charge of the reports of the
servicing function of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association for the
above-referenced Trust, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the
         Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, for inclusion in
         these reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
         under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon
         my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, and except as
         disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
         under the pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement; and

5.       This annual report discloses all significant deficiencies relating to
         the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
         upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, that is included
         in this annual report.





Date:    March 28, 2003


  /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
----------------------------------
Name:    Patricia M. Garvey
Title:   Vice President
Company:   Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
§ 4.1200 Filing of the application for review with the Office of Hearings and Appeals. ( a ) Pursuant to 30 CFR 865.13, within 7 days of receipt of an application for review of alleged discriminatory acts, OSM shall file a copy of the application in the Hearings Division, OHA. OSM shall also file in the Hearings Division, OHA, a copy of any answer submitted in response to the application for review.
( b ) The application for review, as filed in the Hearings Division, OHA, shall be held in suspense until one of the following takes place— ( 1 ) A request for temporary relief is filed pursuant to § 4.1203;
( 2 ) A request is made by OSM for the scheduling of a hearing pursuant to 30 CFR 865.14(a);
( 3 ) A request is made by the applicant for the scheduling of a hearing pursuant to 30 CFR 865.14(a);
( 4 ) A request is made by the applicant for the scheduling of a hearing pursuant to 30 CFR 865.14(b);
( 5 ) A request is made by OSM that OHA close the case because OSM, the applicant, and the alleged discriminating person have entered into an agreement in resolution of the discriminatory acts and there has been compliance with such agreement.
[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 67 FR 4368, Jan. 30, 2002; 67 FR 61510, Oct. 1, 2002; 88 FR 5795, Jan. 30, 2023]
#### § 4300.45 Must I submit any reports?

Yes. Before April 1 of the second permit year and each year afterwards, you must submit a report in duplicate to BLM which describes your grazing operations during the preceding year. Reports do not have to be on a BLM-approved form nor in a particular format.
#### § 3715.2-3 Under what circumstances will BLM allow me to temporarily occupy a site for more than 14 days?

BLM may allow temporary occupancy at a single site to extend beyond the 14-day period described in § 3715.1 if you need to secure the site beyond 14 days through the use of a watchman as allowed by § 3715.2-2, and you have begun consultation with BLM under § 3715.3. If BLM decides not to concur in the occupancy, the temporary occupancy must stop.
#### § 4.839 Exceptions.

Exceptions to rulings of the administrative law judge are unnecessary. It is sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling of the administrative law judge is sought, makes known the action which he desires the administrative law judge to take, or his objection to an action taken, and his ground therefor.
No. 12,862.

#### Ladd et al *v.*Carricato et al.

(2 P. [2d] 1087)

Decided June 15, 1931.

Rehearing denied September 14, 1931.

Mr. Johr A. Mártir, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Ralph L. Neary, for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion.
§ 4.906 What if the Department does not issue a decision by the date my appeal ends? ( a ) If the IBLA or an Assistant Secretary (or the Secretary or the Director of OHA) does not issue a final decision by the date an appeal ends under § 4.904(d), then under 30 U.S.C. 1724(h)(2), the Secretary will be deemed to have decided the appeal: ( 1 ) In favor of the appellant for any nonmonetary obligation at issue in the appeal, or any monetary obligation at issue in the appeal with a principal amount of less than $10,000;
( 2 ) In favor of the Secretary for any monetary obligation at issue in the appeal with a principal amount of $10,000 or more.
( b ) ( 1 ) If your appeal ends before the ONRR Director issues a decision in your appeal, then the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section apply to the monetary and nonmonetary obligations in the order that you contested in your appeal to the Director.
( 2 ) If the ONRR Director issues a decision in your appeal before your appeal ends, and if you appealed the Director's decision to IBLA under 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, then the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section apply to the monetary and nonmonetary obligations in the Director's decision that you contested in your appeal to IBLA.
( 3 ) If the ONRR Director issues an order or a decision in your appeal, and if you do not appeal the Director's order or decision to IBLA within the time required under 30 CFR part 1290, then the ONRR Director's order or decision is the final decision of the Department and 30 U.S.C. 1724(h)(2) has no application.
( c ) If the IBLA issues a decision before the date your appeal ends, that decision is the final decision of the Department and 30 U.S.C. 1724(h)(2) has no application. A petition for reconsideration does not extend or renew the 33-month period.
( d ) If any part of the principal amount of any monetary obligation is not specifically stated in an order or ONRR Director's decision and must be computed to comply with the order or ONRR Director's decision, then the principal amount referred to in paragraph (a) of this section means the principal amount ONRR estimates you would be required to pay as a result of the computation required under the order, plus any amount due stated in the order.
[64 FR 26259, May 13, 1999, as amended at 79 FR 62051, 62052, Oct. 16, 2014]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2263

_____________________________

RUSSELL EDWARD SIMMONS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

David Rimmer, Judge.

August 22, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
### §640d–13. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §14, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1718; Pub. L. 100–666, §4(b), Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3930, which related to relocation of households and members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
## Supporting Statement Appendix of Public Comments and Responses

#1 AS A NATIONAL TAXPAYER, WE DID NOT DO THIS TO THE SALMON AT WILLAMETTE. THE GUYS WHO DID THIS ARE THE COMMERCIAL FI SH PROFITEERS, THEPOLLUTERS, AND THE BOATERS, AND ALL WHO USED THIS AREA. GET THEM WITH A FEE TO REPLENISH THESE SALMON. THE REST OF US ARE ALREADY PAYING VERY HIGH TAXES AND SHOUDL NOT BE FURTHER BLED INTO BANKRUPTCY. ONE ALSO HAS TO WONDER WHY THE FWS DID NOT STEP IN TO STOP THE KILLING OF ALL THE SALMON. WE HAVENUMEROUS GOVT AGENCIES ALL PULLING DOWN HUGE SALARIES. NOBODY DID A THING AND THE SALMON ARE GONE. WHY ARE WE PAYING SUCH HUGE TAXES WHEN NO GOVT AGENCY EVER TAKES CHARGE TO PREVENT THESE DECIMATION OF SPECIES.

Response: We include several questions to probe for scenario rejection, including questions that ask for respondent attitudes on who they think should be responsible for paying for salmon recovery and whether they feel that a tax

- based payment vehicle is appropriate.
#### Grete Heinemann, Respondent, v. Jewish Agricultural Society, Inc., Appellant.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
§ 3602.49 When will BLM issue a non-renewable contract? ( a ) BLM may offer you a contract restricted to a single term or otherwise limited in its duration. We will base this restriction on a finding that— ( 1 ) The land should be used for another, possibly conflicting, purpose after mineral materials are removed;
( 2 ) The deposit of mineral materials may be appropriate for future use by multiple operators or by the local community; or
( 3 ) Other circumstances make renewal inappropriate.
( b ) If BLM limits a contract under this section, the sale notice under § 3602.42 will include this information.
( c ) If your contract is in existence on December 24, 2001, BLM will decide whether you may request renewal of that contract. You must ask BLM for this decision at least 90 days before the contract expires. If fewer than 120 days remain on your existing contract on December 24, 2001, BLM may approve a renewal request that you submit less than 90 days before the contract expires if we decide the contract qualifies for renewal and we have sufficient time to process your request before your contract is due to expire.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neoware Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
G. Kantrowitz, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael G. Kantrowitz
-----------------------------
Michael G. Kantrowitz
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002


                                       25