alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3809.100 What special provisions apply to operations on segregated or withdrawn lands? ( a ) *Mineral examination report.* After the date on which the lands are withdrawn from appropriation under the mining laws, BLM will not approve a plan of operations or allow notice-level operations to proceed until BLM has prepared a mineral examination report to determine whether the mining claim was valid before the withdrawal, and whether it remains valid. BLM may require preparation of a mineral examination report before approving a plan of operations or allowing notice-level operations to proceed on segregated lands. If the report concludes that the mining claim is invalid, BLM will not approve operations or allow notice-level operations on the mining claim. BLM will also promptly initiate contest proceedings.
( b ) *Allowable operations.* If BLM has not completed the mineral examination report under paragraph (a) of this section, if the mineral examination report for proposed operations concludes that a mining claim is invalid, or if there is a pending contest proceeding for the mining claim, ( 1 ) BLM may— ( i ) Approve a plan of operations for the disputed mining claim proposing operations that are limited to taking samples to confirm or corroborate mineral exposures that are physically disclosed and existing on the mining claim before the segregation or withdrawal date, whichever is earlier; and
( ii ) Approve a plan of operations for the operator to perform the minimum necessary annual assessment work under § 3851.1 of this title; or
( 2 ) A person may only conduct exploration under a notice that is limited to taking samples to confirm or corroborate mineral exposures that are physically disclosed and existing on the mining claim before the segregation or withdrawal date, whichever is earlier.
( c ) *Time limits.* While BLM prepares a mineral examination report under paragraph (a) of this section, it may suspend the time limit for responding to a notice or acting on a plan of operations. See §§ 3809.311 and 3809.411, respectively.
( d ) *Final decision.* If a final departmental decision declares a mining claim to be null and void, the operator must cease all operations, except required reclamation.
### §459c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 459c was editorially reclassified as section 5504 of this title.
Case 1:20-cv-21913-UU   Document 1-3   Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2020   Page 1 of 1
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA - 2011 - 1115 Directorate ID: 2010 - SW - 011 - AD Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S - 92A Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 37 Helicopters i n the US Registry. Reason : to prevent the use of inaccurate engine performance data in calculating maximum gross weight by revising the Operating Limitations section of the rotorcraft flight manual. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 0 Labor per Helicopter ( 1 x $ 8 5 /work- hour) $ 85 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 85 Total US Fleet Cost $ 3,145 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: John Coffey
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended July 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Fuller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by In
Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





September 14, 2005                             /s/ John Fuller
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John Fuller
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60220-60221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22434]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34545]

Genesee & Wyoming, Inc.--Continuance in Control Exemption-
Tazewell & Peoria Railroad, Inc.

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of Exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board grants an exemption, under 49 U.S.C. 10502, from the 
prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323-25 for Genesee & 
Wyoming, Inc. (GWI), a noncarrier, to continue in control of Tazewell & 
Peoria Railroad, Inc. (TPR), upon TPR's becoming a rail carrier 
pursuant to a related transaction involving the lease and operation of 
a line of the Peoria and Pekin Union Railway Company.\1\ GWI is a 
holding company that directly or indirectly controls 1 Class II rail 
carrier, 21 operating Class III rail carriers, and 4 non-operating 
Class III rail carriers. A line of one of GWI's subsidiaries, Illinois 
& Midland Railroad, Inc., connects at Pekin, IL, with the line to be 
leased by TPR in the related transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Tazewell & Peoria Railroad, Inc.--Lease and Operation 
Exemption--Peoria and Pekin Union Railway Company, STB Finance 
Docket No. 34544 (STB served Sept. 28, 2004).

DATES: This exemption will be effective on October 28, 2004. Petitions 
to stay must be filed by October 15, 2004. Petitions to reopen must be 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
filed by October 22, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Send an original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring 
to STB Finance Docket No. 34545, to: Surface Transportation Board, 1925 
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, send one copy of 
pleadings to Jo A. DeRoche, Weiner Brodsky Sidman Kider PC, 1300 19th 
Street, NW., Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20036-1609.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric S. Davis, (202) 565-1600 
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, e-
mail or call: ASAP Document Solutions, 9332 Annapolis Rd., Suite 103, 
Lanham, MD 20706; e-mail [email protected]; telephone (301) 577-2600. 
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through FIRS at 1-
800-877-8339.]
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at 
www.stb.dot.gov.

[[Page 60221]]

    Decided: September 30, 2004.

    By the Board, Chairman Nober, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and 
Commissioner Buttrey.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-22434 Filed 10-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUser guide to the Magellan synthetic aperture radar imagesThe Magellan radar-mapping mission collected a large amount of science and engineering data. Now available to the general scientific community, this data set can be overwhelming to someone who is unfamiliar with the mission. This user guide outlines the mission operations and data set so that someone working with the data can understand the mapping and data-processing techniques used in the mission. Radar-mapping parameters as well as data acquisition issues are discussed. In addition, this user guide provides information on how the data set is organized and where specific elements of the set can be located.Document ID19950018567Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeOther - NASA Reference Publication (RP)AuthorsWall, Stephen D.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Mcconnell, Shannon L.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Leff, Craig E.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Austin, Richard S.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Beratan, Kathi K.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Rokey, Mark J.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1995Subject CategoryLunar And Planetary ExplorationReport/Patent NumberNASA-RP-1356NAS 1.61:1356Accession Number95N24987Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS7-1260Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19950018567.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
United States Department ofthe Interior

APR18 ~9B

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Region 1

911 N.E. 11th Avenue

Portland OR 97232-41St

U.S. Bureau ofReclamation

Mid-Pacific Region

2800 Cottage Way

Sacramento CA 95825-1898

Subject: Final CVPIA Administrative Proposal on Water Transfers

Dear Interested Party:

In September 1995, the Department ofthe Interior(Interior) invited the public to identify their

concerns regarding implementation ofthe Central Valley ProjectImprovement Act (CVPIA). To

facilitate public input and discussion, Interiorrepresentatives held a series ofpublic meetings

between September 1995 and April 1996. During these meetings, 12 major areas ofconcern were

identified, and individuals volunteered to form work teams and discuss the specific issues pertaining

to those areas. In April 1996, Interior committed to the preparation ofan Administrative Proposal to

addressthe principal issues raised by stakeholders during the public forum and work team meetings.

To that end, Interior circulated the draft Administrative Proposal on Water Transfers on June 14, 1996,

forreview by interested parties, and received written comments from 14 parties. Enclosed is the final

Administrative Proposal on Water Transfers which has been revised to reflect key comments received,

as well as previously raised concerns.

Copies ofthis final proposal can be accessed on the Mid-Pacific Region’s home page at

http:/www.mp.usbr.gov or can be obtained by calling Ms. Alisha Sterud at 916/978-5195 or

TDD 916/978-5608.

Sincerely,

pear

Regioui~al Director

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Region 1

Roger K. Patterson

Regional Director

U.S. Bureau ofReclamation

Mid-Pacific Region

w

Enclosure
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61227-CIV-ALTMAN/Hunt

DANIEL MONCADA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WAWA, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER SCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE

The Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges violations of one of the following: the Americans with 

Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181, et seq, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 

(the “FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692–1692p, et seq, or the Telephone Consumer Protection Act 

(the “TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. §§ 227, et seq. Consistent with the Court’s practices in such cases, 

counsel are directed to appear at a status conference on Wednesday, July 22, 2020, at 1:00 p.m.

The conference will be conducted telephonically. At that time, the parties shall dial 1-888-363-

4734 and enter access code 9127026, followed by the # symbol. Counsel must not utilize 

speakerphone functionality during the hearing. If possible, counsel should use a landline. 

Instructions for the status conference are as follows:

1. The parties are not personally required to appear, but a representative of each 

party with full authority to enter a full and complete compromise must appear. 

2. If an agreement is reached, the parties shall promptly notify the Court.

3. The Plaintiff’s counsel must appear with the entire case file. If any of the 

Defendants have not yet appeared, the Plaintiff must serve a copy of this 

Case 0:20-cv-60900-RKA Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 1 of 3
2

Order on any such Defendant within two business days of the date of this 

Order. 

4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter this Order in the following cases:

a. 20-cv- 61227 – Moncada v. WAWA, Inc.

i. (Call in time: 1:00 p.m.)

b. 20-cv-81004 – Fernandez v. Applebee’s

i. (Call in time: 1:10 p.m.)

c. 20-cv-80836 – Cohan v. Lowe’s

i. (Call in time: 1:20 p.m.)

d. 20-cv-61384 – Mahlberg v. Chico’s FAS, Inc.

i. (Call in time: 1:30 p.m.)

e. 20-cv-21346 – Ezold v. Tracfone Wireless

i. (Call in time: 1:40 p.m.)

f. 20-cv-61206 – St. Clair v. USHealth Advisors

i. (Call in time: 1:50 p.m.)

g. 20-cv-60900 – Durrant v. Fiserv, Inc.

i. (Call in time: 2:00 p.m.)

h. 20-cv-61297 – Hall v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al.

i. (Call in time: 2:10 p.m.)

i. 20-cv-60804 – Harwood v. Nationwide Credit

i. (Call in time: 2:20 p.m.)

j. 20-cv-61295 – Amodio v. Cavalry Investment, LLC et al.

i. (Call in time: 2:30 p.m.)

Case 0:20-cv-60900-RKA Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 2 of 3
k. 20-cv-61257 – Aitboukil v. Jefferson Capital Sys., LLC et al.

i. (Call in time: 2:40 p.m.)

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 13th day of July 2020.

 _________________________________

 ROY K. ALTMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-60900-RKA Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 3 of 3
### **Subchapter D—Seizure of Property for Collection of Taxes**

Part
I.
Due process for collections.
II.
Levy.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Amendments

**1998**—Pub. L. 105–206, title III, §3401(b), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 747, added part analysis.
GREAT AMERICAN FINANCIAL RESOURCES, INC.



EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002









In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Great American Financial Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













|/s/ S. Craig LindnerS. Craig Lindner
Chief Executive Officer | /s/ Christopher P. MilianoChristopher P. Miliano
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



May 6, 2005



A signed original of this written statement will be retained by the Registrant

and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRotating-unbalanced-mass Devices for Scanning Balloon-borne Experiments, Free-flying Spacecraft, and Space Shuttle/space Station ExperimentsA new method is presented for scanning balloon-borne experiments, free-flying spacecraft, and gimballed experiments mounted to the space shuttle or the space station. It uses rotating-unbalanced-mass (RUM) devices for generating circular, line, or raster scan patterns and an auxiliary control system for target acquisition, keeping the scan centered on the target, and producing complementary motion for raster scanning. It is ideal for applications where the only possible way to accomplish the required scan is to physically scan the entire experiment or spacecraft as in x ray and gamma ray experiments. In such cases, this new method should have advantages over prior methods in terms of either power, weight, cost, performance, stability, or a combination of these.Document ID19900015939Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsPolites, Michael E.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:3030NASA-TP-3030Accession Number90N25255Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015939.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# Capital Relief

Schedule A-2B1Page &P of &N
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:20-CV-21887-DPG

COMMODITIES FUTURES TRADING

COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

DANIEL FINGERHUT, 

DIGITAL PLATINUM, INC., DIGITAL 

PLATINUM, LTD., HUF MEDIYA 

(A/K/A HOOF MEDIA), TAL

VALARIOLA, and ITAY BARAK

Defendants,

AICEL CARBONERO, 

Relief Defendant. 

____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER’S INITIAL INTERIM APPLICATION FOR AN 

ORDER APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF FEES AND 

EXPENSES OF RECEIVER AND HER PROFESSIONALS

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Receiver’s Initial Interim Application for 

an Order Approving and Authorizing Payment of Fees and Expenses of Receiver and Her

Professionals (the “Application”) [ECF No. ____]. The Court, having reviewed the Application, 

noting that the fees and costs requested therein are reasonable, necessary and commensurate with 

the skills and experience required for the activities performed and described therein, and that no 

objection to the Application has been filed, and otherwise being fully advised in the matter, finds 

good cause to approve the Application and grant the relief requested therein.

Accordingly, it is -

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Application is APPROVED.

Case 1:20-cv-21887-DPG Document 148-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2020 Page 1 of 2
2. The total amount of fees and costs that the Receiver1 and her Lead Counsel, 

Damian & Valori LLP, incurred regarding work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties 

during the Application Period in the amount of $86,300.06 is hereby APPROVED.

3. The Receiver is AUTHORIZED to pay the Receiver and her Lead Counsel, 

Damian & Valori LLP, the amount of $86,300.06 (which total includes $83,758 in fees and 

$2,542.06 in costs) work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties.

4. The total amount of fees and costs that the Forensic Accountants, Kapila 

Mukamal, LLP, incurred regarding work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties during 

the Application Period in the amount of $9,335.75 is hereby APPROVED. 

5. The Receiver is AUTHORIZED to pay to her Forensic Accountants, 

Kapila Mukamal, LLP, the amount of $9,335.75 (which total includes $9,172.00 in fees 

and $163.75 in costs) for work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties.

6. The Court reserves final approval of all fees approved herein until such time 

as the Receiver is discharged of her duties in this matter and/or final disbursement of funds 

held by the Estate. 

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on this ____ day of 

___________, 2020.

_______________________________________

HONORABLE DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Copies to: All Counsel of Record

1 Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same ascribed meaning as in the Application. 

Case 1:20-cv-21887-DPG Document 148-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §4282. Transportation by air for other members of affiliated group

#### (a) General rule

Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, if—

(1) one member of an affiliated group is the owner or lessee of an aircraft, and

(2) such aircraft is not available for hire by persons who are not members of such group,

no tax shall be imposed under section 4261 or 4271 upon any payment received by one member of the affiliated group from another member of such group for services furnished to such other member in connection with the use of such aircraft.

#### (b) Availability for hire

For purposes of subsection (a), the determination of whether an aircraft is available for hire by persons who are not members of an affiliated group shall be made on a flight-by-flight basis.

#### (c) Affiliated group

For purposes of subsection (a), the term "affiliated group" has the meaning assigned to such term by section 1504(a), except that all corporations shall be treated as includible corporations (without any exclusion under section 1504(b)).

(Added Pub. L. 91–258, title II, §205(a)(1), May 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 241; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §1609(f), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1842.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4282, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 508, defined "fair charge" in connection with tax on transportation of oil by pipeline, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 85–475, §4(a), June 30, 1958, 72 Stat. 260. For effective date of repeal, see section 4(c) of Pub. L. 85–475, set out as an Effective Date of 1958 Amendment note under section 6415 of this title.

#### Amendments

1996—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 104–188 added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsec. (b) as (c).

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–188 effective on 7th calendar day after Aug. 20, 1996, see section 1609(i) of Pub. L. 104–188, set out as a note under section 4041 of this title.
# OUTPUT

Schedule A-9Page &P of &N

# Footnotes

Schedule A-9Page &P of &N
### §4414. Cross references

**For penalties and other general and administrative provisions applicable to this subchapter, see sections 4421 to 4423, inclusive; and subtitle F.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 527.)
#### § 2564.3 Native towns occupied partly by white occupants.

Native towns which are occupied partly by white lot occupants will be surveyed and disposed of under the provisions of both the Act of March 3, 1891 (26 Stat. 1095, 1099), and the Act of May 25, 1926 (44 Stat. 629).