alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3830.94 How may I cure a defect in my compliance with these regulations? ( a ) ( 1 ) When BLM determines that you have filed any document that is defective or underpaid a fee or service charge, BLM will send a notice to you by certified mail-return receipt requested at the address you gave on: ( i ) Your notice or certificate of location;
( ii ) An address correction you have filed with BLM; or
( iii ) A valid transfer document filed with BLM.
( 2 ) The notice provided for in paragraph (a)(1) of this section constitutes legal service even if you do not actually receive the notice or decision. See § 1810.2 of this chapter.
( b ) If you have filed any defective document other than a defective fee waiver request, you must cure the defects within 30 days of receiving BLM's notification of the defects.
( c ) If you have submitted a defective fee waiver request, you must cure the defects or pay the annual maintenance fees within 60 days of receiving BLM's notification of the defects.
( d ) If BLM does not receive the requested information in the time allowed, or if the matter is statutorily not curable, you will receive a final decision from BLM that you forfeited the affected mining claims or sites.
§ 418.14 Recordkeeping requirements. ( a ) By the end of each month, the District must submit to the Bureau's Lahontan Area Office reports for the previous month which document monthly inflow and outflow in acre-feet from the Truckee and Carson divisions of the Project for that month. Reports must include any data the Bureau may reasonably require to monitor compliance with this part.
( b ) Accounting for farm headgate deliveries must be based on the amount of water actually delivered to the water user. Project operations must provide for the amount of water ordered and the distribution system losses.
( c ) The District must keep records of all domestic and other water uses showing the purpose and amount of water usage for each entity. The District must make the records available for review by the Bureau upon request. The Bureau may audit all records kept by the District.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,588
<CGS>                                            7,550
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  94
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                       714
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .066
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .066
        

</TABLE>
#### § 9183.0-2 Objectives.

Information respecting special surveys of soldier's additional entries, homesites, homesteads, and trade and manufacturing sites is given in subparts 2610, 2511, 2562, and 2730 of this chapter, respectively.

[35 FR 9798, June 13, 1970]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-80713-SMITH/MATTHEWMAN

NELSON FERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SHOP 601, LLC,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation on 

Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney’s Fees, Costs, and Expert Expenses [DE 14], in which the 

Magistrate Judge recommends granting in part Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney’s Fees, Costs, 

and Expert Expenses [DE 12] and granting Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs [DE 11]. No objections have 

been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Thus, having reviewed, de novo, Magistrate Judge 

Valle=s Report and Recommendation, the record, and given that Plaintiff has not objected, it is 

ORDERED that 

1. The Report and Recommendation to District Judge [DE 14] is AFFIRMED and 

ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney’s Fees, Costs, and Expert Expenses [DE 12] is 

GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and the Bill of Costs [DE 11] is GRANTED:

a) Plaintiff is awarded $2,932.50 in attorney’s fees.

b) Plaintiff’s Application for Expert Expenses is DENIED.

c) Plaintiff is awarded $485.80 in costs.

Case 9:20-cv-80713-RS Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/30/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

3. The Court will enter a separate judgment.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 30th day of October, 2020.

cc: All parties of record

Case 9:20-cv-80713-RS Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/30/2020 Page 2 of 2
No. 32,586

#### The Protection State Bank, *Appellant,*v. Ina D. Baker, *Appellee.*

(55 P. 2d 818)

Supplemental opinion, extending redemption period, filed March 16, 1936; otherwise, former opinion adhered to.

(For original opinion of reversal see 143 Kan. 201, 53 P. 2d 469.)

*Howard T. Fleeson, Fred W. Aley, Carl G. Tebbe*and *Wayne Coulson,*all of Wichita, for the appellant.

*Jay T. Botts,*of Coldwater, for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Upon an examination of appellee’s motion for a rehearing, it appears that no arguments bearing on the question of homestead are presented which were not considered on the original submission of the cause, and said motion is denied. However, our attention is directed to the question of appellee’s right to an extended period of redemption, a matter not heretofore presented.

The trial court refused to confirm the sale of real estate held March 19,1934, holding the real estate to be a homestead and exempt from sale on execution. We held the trial court erred, and directed the sale be confirmed. The' result is that appellee had no opportunity to redeem within the statutory period, which expired while the cause has been pending in this court. Equity demands that appellee have a fair opportunity to redeem from said sale, and, upon consideration, we find she should have until July 15, 1936, in which to redeem.

Our former opinion is supplemented to this extent: The trial court, in confirming the sheriff’s sale, is directed to fix a period of redemption expiring on July 15, 1936. In all other respects the original opinion is adhered to.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Volcanoes, Craters & Lava Flows
#### Walter Blanchard, Respondent, v. Otis Elevator Company, Appellant.

No opinion. Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 14, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Gary Rasmussen                          |   |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Name Gary Rasmussen                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|                 |   | Title Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                            |   |
|                 |   |                                                                                                                                                                          |   |
#### § 4610.4-2 Disposition of receipts.

All moneys received in the administration of lands leased under the Pierce Act will be deposited in the Treasury of the United States as provided in section 4 of that Act and will be available when appropriated by the Congress for the leasing of lands. Distribution of such receipts, therefore, will not be made as provided in sections 10 and 11 of the Taylor Grazing Act (48 Stat. 1273; 43 U.S.C. 315i, 315j).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0059 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RICHARD L. RUTLEDGE,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 28 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 22 2024

04/22/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0059
#### COLSON et al, Respondents, v. JOHNSON et al, Appellants.

(202 N. W. 389.)

(File No. 5414.

Opinion filed February 24, 1925.)

Vendor and Purchaser — Contracts—Vendor Not Entitled to Deficiency Judgment on Default of Payment Under Land Contract.

In action to foreclose lien on default of payments under contract for sale of land, and asking for sale under execution, vendor held not entitled to deficiency judgment, but merely t« sums paid on purchase price, and foreclosure of vendee’s rights, on his failure to comply with contract within time fixed by court.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brule County; HoN. FraNK B. Smith, Judge.'

Suit by Ethel M. Colson and others against Minnie C. Johnson and others. Judgment for plaintiffs’, and defendants appeal.

Remanded, with -directions to modify.

*Henry M. Kidder,*of Fremont, Neb., and *Kirby, Kirby & Kirby,*of Sioux Falls, for Appellants.

*Brown & Brown,*of Chamberlain, and *Courtright, Snider, Lee & Gunderson,*of Fremont, Neb., for Respondents.

Appellant cited: Sin You v. Wong Lee, 16 S. D. 383; Hick-son v. Culbert, 19 S. D. 207; Kjolseth v. Kjolseth, 27 S. D. 80; First National Bank v. Mather, 29 S. D. 555; Schmidt v. Scanlon, 32 S. D. 608; Cottonwood County Bank v. Case, 25 S. D. 77.

*125Note. — Reported in 202 N. W. 389. See Headnote, American Key-Numbered Digest, Vendor and purchaser, Key-No. 291, 39 Cyc. 1876.

DIEEON, J.

This appeal grows out of a contract for the sale of real estate. Partial peyments were made by the vendee, who then defaulted. The vendor then brought this action to foreclose the vendee’s right under the contract, but in his complaint asked for a sale of the property involved under execution, and for deficiency judgment in case the property did not sell for enough to cover the deferred payments. Bindings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment were in favor of plaintiff, granting him a deficiency judgment as prayed for in the complaint.

'In their brief counsel for the plaintiff say that this is an action to foreclose the vendee’s interest in the land described in the contract. 'We think this statement is correct, but the plaintiff is not entitled to a deficiency judgment. He is entitled to retain the sums of money that have been paid on the purchase price, and is entitled to have the vendee’s rights foreclosed.

This cause is remanded to the trial court, with directions to modify the judgment, and without further trial, instead of providing for sale on execution, to fix a period within which appellants shall comply with, and, if they do not, then that their rights under the contract shall be forever barred.

AND EPSON, J. not sitting.
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Charles J. Novak, Chief Financial Officer of Integrated Surgical Systems,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
          ended June 30, 2004, which this certification accompanies (the
          "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.




Dated: November 24, 2004                     /s/ Charles J. Novak
                                             --------------------
                                             Charles J. Novak
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual report of Fun City Popcorn, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Richard A.
Falk, President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                            /s/  Richard A. Falk
                                            ---------------------------
                                                 Richard A. Falk
                                                 President and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer


January 12, 2004
§ 4110.2-1 Base property. ( a ) The authorized officer shall find land or water owned or controlled by an applicant to be base property (see § 4100.0-5) if: ( 1 ) It is capable of serving as a base of operation for livestock use of public lands within a grazing district; or
( 2 ) It is contiguous land, or, when no applicant owns or controls contiguous land, noncontiguous land that is capable of being used in conjunction with a livestock operation which would utilize public lands outside a grazing district.
( b ) After appropriate consultation, cooperation, and coordination, the authorized officer shall specify the length of time for which land base property shall be capable of supporting authorized livestock during the year, relative to the multiple use management objective of the public lands.
( c ) An applicant shall provide a legal description, or plat, of the base property and shall certify to the authorized officer that this base property meets the requirements under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( d ) A permittee's or lessee's interest in water previously recognized as base property on public land shall be deemed sufficient in meeting the requirement that the applicant control base property. Where such waters become unusable and are replaced by newly constructed or reconstructed water developments that are the subject of a range improvement permit or cooperative range improvement agreement, the permittee's or lessee's interest in the replacement water shall be deemed sufficient in meeting the requirement that the applicant control base property.
( e ) If a permittee or lessee loses ownership or control of all or part of his/her base property, the permit or lease, to the extent it was based upon such lost property, shall terminate immediately without further notice from the authorized officer. However, if, prior to losing ownership or control of the base property, the permittee or lessee requests, in writing, that the permit or lease be extended to the end of the grazing season or grazing year, the termination date may be extended as determined by the authorized officer after consultation with the new owner. When a permit or lease terminates because of a loss of ownership or control of a base property, the grazing preference shall remain with the base property and be available through application and transfer procedures at 43 CFR 4110.2-3, to the new owner or person in control of that base property.
( f ) Applicants who own or control base property contiguous to or cornering upon public land outside a grazing district where such public land consists of an isolated or disconnected tract embracing 760 acres or less shall, for a period of 90 days after the tract has been offered for lease, have a preference right to lease the whole tract.
[43 FR 29067, July 5, 1978, as amended at 46 FR 5788, Jan. 19, 1981; 49 FR 6450, Feb. 21, 1984; 53 FR 10233, Mar. 29, 1988; 60 FR 9962, Feb. 22, 1995; 71 FR 39503, July 12, 2006]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Secretary

In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of countries which may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

On the basis of the best information currently available to the Department of the Treasury, the following countries may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

Bahrain, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Republic of.

Dated: September 29, 2004.

Barbara Angus, 

International Tax Counsel, (Tax Policy).

[FR Doc. 04-22366  Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
#### §§ 4.202-4.308 [Reserved]
§ 3585.5-5 Contents of notice. The Notice of Exploration prepared by the authorized officer and furnished to the applicant shall contain: ( a ) The name and address of the applicant;
( b ) A description of the lands;
( c ) The address of the Bureau office where the exploration plan will be available for inspection; and
( d ) An invitation to the public to participate in the exploration under the license.
#### § 4.842 Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Within 30 days after the close of the hearing each party may file, or the administrative law judge may request, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law together with supporting briefs. Such proposals and briefs shall be served on all parties and amici. Reply briefs may be submitted within 15 days after receipt of the initial proposals and briefs. Reply briefs should be filed and served on all parties and amici.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Theodore R. Maloney,certify that:

 

1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for theyear ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) of MediCor Ltd. (the “Company”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of MediCor.

 
| Date: July 24, 2006 |                    |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|
|                     |                    |
|                     | /s/ Theodore R. Maloney |   |
|                     | Theodore R. Maloney     |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### § 50.3 May the Native Hawaiian community reorganize itself based on island or other geographic, historical, or cultural ties?

The Secretary will reestablish a formal government-to-government relationship with only one sovereign Native Hawaiian government, which may include political subdivisions with limited powers of self-governance defined in the Native Hawaiian government's governing document.