alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 4610.4-1 Computation of fees.

The aggregate of the grazing fees collected for the use of the lands leased under the provisions of the Pierce Act must be sufficient to insure a return to the United States of an amount equal to the aggregate of the rentals paid for such lands and the aggregate of the grazing fees collected for the use of all the lands leased in any one State must be at least equal to the aggregate of the rentals paid in that State.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

FREDRICK J. GAILOR, JR. and

CATHERINE ANN FORM,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 3:20cv4494-TKW-EMT 

WALMART CORPORATION STORE 

#3235, et al.,

Defendants.

/

OR D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 8) and Plaintiffs’ objection (Doc. 9). Based on my de novo 

review of the issues raised in the objection, I agree with the magistrate judge’s 

determination that this case should be transferred to the Southern District of Florida 

because it involves allegations of public accommodation discrimination by 

employees of a Walmart store located in North Miami Beach. See 28 U.S.C. 

§1391(b)(2) (explaining that venue is proper in the district in which a substantial 

part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred). 

The Court has not overlooked Plaintiffs’ conclusory assertion that they “fear 

provable prejudice from Dade County” (Doc. 9, at 1); however, there is no basis for 

this assertion in the record, and even if there was, it would have no bearing on the 

Case 1:20-cv-22347-JEM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

question of the proper venue for this suit. Moreover, it is noteworthy that this case 

is being transferred to another federal district court over which Dade County has no 

control or influence. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs’ objection (Doc. 9) is overruled, and the magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) is adopted by the Court and 

incorporated into this Order.

2. This case is TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of Florida, and the 

Clerk shall close the file in this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-22347-JEM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 3830.2 What is the scope of these regulations? These regulations govern locating, recording, and maintaining mining claims, mill sites, and tunnel sites on all Federal lands. These regulations do not authorize locating any new mining claims on Federal lands closed to mineral entry, including units of the National Park Service. ( a ) You must follow the recording and maintenance requirements in this part even if BLM has actual knowledge of the existence of your mining claims or sites through other means.
( b ) Part 3838 of this chapter describes supplemental procedures for locating mining claims or sites on land subject to the Stockraising Homestead Act, 43 U.S.C. 291-299.
( c ) BLM is not the official recording office for ancillary documents concerning mining claims or sites, including but not limited to, leases, wills, judgments, liens, option agreements, and grubstake contracts.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of E Med Future, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the Report) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                      |  |                        
|------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ D. Dane Donohue                   |  | /s/ Donald Sullivan    
|D. Dane Donohue                       |  | Donald Sullivan        
|PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Date: June 30, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58353-58354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Part 219

[DFARS Case 2004-D015]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Extension of 
Partnership Agreement--8(a) Program

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule amending the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to reflect an extension in 
the expiration date of a partnership agreement between DoD and the 
Small Business Administration (SBA). The partnership agreement permits 
DoD to award contracts to 8(a) Program participants on behalf of SBA.

DATES: Effective September 29, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Donna Hairston-Benford, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations Council, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DAR), IMD 3C132, 
3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone (703) 602-
0289; facsimile (703) 602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2004-D015.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background

    By partnership agreement dated February 1, 2002, between the SBA 
and DoD, the SBA delegated to DoD its authority to enter into contracts 
under Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)). The 
expiration date of the partnership agreement has been extended from 
September 30, 2004, to September 30, 2005. This final rule amends DFARS 
219.800 to reflect the extension.
    This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review 
under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This rule will not have a significant cost or administrative impact 
on contractors or offerors, or a significant

[[Page 58354]]

effect beyond the internal operating procedures of DoD. Therefore, 
publication for public comment is not required. However, DoD will 
consider comments from small entities concerning the affected DFARS 
subpart in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments should cite 
DFARS Case 2004-D015.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does 
not impose any information collection requirements that require the 
approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, 
et seq.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 219

    Government procurement.

Michele P. Peterson,
Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.

0
Therefore, 48 CFR part 219 is amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 219 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.

PART 219--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS


219.800  [Amended]

0
2. Section 219.800 is amended in paragraph (a), in the last sentence, 
by removing ``2004'' and adding in its place ``2005''.

[FR Doc. 04-21852 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P
§ 7.9 Terms and conditions of permits. ( a ) In all permits issued, the Federal land manager shall specify: ( 1 ) The nature and extent of work allowed and required under the permit, including the time, duration, scope, location, and purpose of the work;
( 2 ) The name of the individual(s) responsible for conducting the work and, if different, the name of the individual(s) responsible for carrying out the terms and conditions of the permit;
( 3 ) The name of any university, museum, or other scientific or educational institutions in which any collected materials and data shall be deposited; and
( 4 ) Reporting requirements.
( b ) The Federal land manager may specify such terms and conditions as deemed necessary, consistent with this part, to protect public safety and other values and/or resources, to secure work areas, to safeguard other legitimate land uses, and to limit activities incidental to work authorized under a permit.
( c ) The Federal land manager shall include in permits issued for archaeological work on Indian lands such terms and conditions as may be requested by the Indian landowner and the Indian tribe having jurisdiction over the lands, and for archaeological work on public lands shall include such terms and conditions as may have been developed pursuant to § 7.7.
( d ) Initiation of work or other activities under the authority of a permit signifies the permittee's acceptance of the terms and conditions of the permit.
( e ) The permittee shall not be released from requirements of a permit until all outstanding obligations have been satisfied, whether or not the term of the permit has expired.
( f ) The permittee may request that the Federal land manager extend or modify a permit.
( g ) The permittee's performance under any permit issued for a period greater than 1 year shall be subject to review by the Federal land manager, at least annually.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 2.3

                              CERTIFICATE OF MERGER

                                       OF

                            BASTET BROADCASTING, INC.
                             a Delaware corporation

                                       AND

                   MISSION BROADCASTING OF WICHITA FALLS, INC.
                             a Delaware corporation

In accordance with Section 251 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware

It is hereby certified that:

     1. The constituent business corporations participating in the merger herein
certified are:

     (i) Bastet Broadcasting, Inc., which is incorporated under the laws of the
State of Delaware; and

     (ii) Mission Broadcasting of Wichita Falls, Inc. which is incorporated
under the laws of the State of Delaware.

     2. An Agreement of Merger has been approved, adopted, certified, executed
and acknowledged by each of the aforesaid constituent corporations in accordance
with the provisions of subsection (c) of Section 251 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware.

     3. The name of the surviving corporation in the merger herein certified is
Mission Broadcasting of Wichita Falls, Inc., which will continue its existence
as said surviving corporation under its present name upon the effective date of
said merger pursuant to the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.

     4. The certificate of incorporation of Mission Broadcasting of Wichita
Falls, Inc., as now in force and effect, shall continue to be the certificate of
incorporation of said surviving corporation until amended and changed pursuant
to the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     5. The executed Agreement of Merger between the aforesaid constituent
corporations is on file at an office of the aforesaid surviving corporation, the
address of which is as follows: 544 Red Rock Drive, Wadsworth, Ohio 44281.

<PAGE>

     6. A copy of the aforesaid Agreement of Merger will be furnished by the
aforesaid surviving corporation, on request, and without cost, to any
stockholder of each of the aforesaid constituent corporations.

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of
Merger as of this 30th day of September, 2002.

                                                 BASTET BROADCASTING, INC.

                                                 By: /s/ David S. Smith
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                 Name: David S. Smith
                                                 Title: President

                                                 MISSION BROADCASTING OF WICHITA
                                                 FALLS, INC.

                                                 By: /s/ David S. Smith
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                 Name: David S. Smith
                                                 Title: President
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4803 

To repeal the authority under the National Labor Relations Act for States 

to enact laws prohibiting agreements requiring membership in a labor 

organization as a condition of employment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BROWN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. SMITH, Ms. 

STABENOW, Ms. HASSAN, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. LUJA ́N, 

and Mr. PADILLA) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To repeal the authority under the National Labor Relations 

Act for States to enact laws prohibiting agreements requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nationwide Right To 

5 Unionize Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4803 IS

1 SEC. 2. PREEMPTING STATE RIGHT-TO-WORK LAWS. 

2 Subsection (b) of section 14 of the National Labor 

3 Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 164) is repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### § 3834.21 How will BLM adjust the location and maintenance fees?

BLM will adjust the location and maintenance fees at least every 5 years, based upon the CPI, as required by 30 U.S.C. 28j(c), or at any other time as required by other statute.

[70 FR 52030, Sept. 1, 2005]
#### § 3214.11 Who must my bond cover?

Your bond must cover all record title owners, operating rights owners, operators, and any person who conducts operations on your lease.
#### § 4.1354 Determination by the administrative law judge.

The administrative law judge shall promptly set a time and place for and give notice of the hearing to the applicant or operator and shall issue a decision within 60 days of the filing of a request for hearing. The hearing shall be of record and governed by 5 U.S.C. 554.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-60935-CIV-SMITH

KENNY MOHAN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette Reid’s Report and 

Recommendation [DE 4], which recommends dismissal of Plaintiff’s Petition [DE 1] as an 

unauthorized successive petition. Petitioner filed a Response to the Report and Recommendation 

[DE 5]. Petitioner does not object to the Magistrate Judge’s legal or factual conclusion or analysis. 

Rather, Petitioner indicates he “agrees with the contents of the Report” and explains he was 

“ignorant” of the requirement to seek leave of the Eleventh Circuit prior to filing another petition. 

Upon consideration, it is

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [DE 4] is AFFIRMED AND 

ADOPTED:

1) This case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction because Petitioner failed to obtain 

from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals the authorization required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).

2) All pending motions not otherwise ruled on are DENIED AS MOOT.

3) This case is CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 31st day of August 2020.

Case 0:20-cv-60935-RS Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2020 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>
			
<ARTICLE>                                 5				
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS	
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                               16,262 
<SECURITIES>                      1,198,753 
<RECEIVABLES>                        16,448 
<ALLOWANCES>                          8,000
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,359,405 
<PP&E>                              632,422 
<DEPRECIATION>                      342,926 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    2,438,062 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               305,490 
<BONDS>                                   0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0 
<PREFERRED>                               0 
<COMMON>                             77,279 
<OTHER-SE>                        2,055,293 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      2,438,062 
<SALES>                               8,799 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      8,799 
<CGS>                                 6,365 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         6,365 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    949,359 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      440 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (879,363)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (879,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0 
<CHANGES>                                 0 
<NET-INCOME>                       (879,363)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.17)



</TABLE>
§ 4150.4-1 Notice of intent to impound. ( a ) A written notice of intent to impound shall be sent by certified mail or personally delivered to the owner or his agent, or both. The written notice shall indicate that unauthorized livestock on the specified public lands or other lands under Bureau of Land Management control, or both, may be impounded any time after 5 days from delivery of the notice.
( b ) Where the owner and his agent are unknown, or where both a known owner and his agent refuses to accept delivery, a notice of intent to impound shall be published in a local newspaper and posted at the county courthouse and a post office near the public land involved. The notice shall indicate that unauthorized livestock on the specified public lands or other lands under Bureau of Land Management control, or both, may be impounded any time after 5 days from publishing and posting the notice.
[43 FR 29067, July 5, 1978. Redesignated and amended at 47 FR 41712, Sept. 21, 1982; 49 FR 6454, Feb. 21, 1984]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Neoware, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith D. Schneck,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
         Report.




/s/ KEITH D. SCHNECK
-------------------------------------------
Keith D. Schneck
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 7, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Pollinators





Contact Us
  Life, as we know it, depends on pollinators *"Nature is to be found in her entirety nowhere more than in her smallest creatures."*-- Pliny the Elder
  a butterfly on a pink thistle flowerWhat are Pollinators? Find out what pollinators are and why they are so important to the health of our ecosystems.
 a bee on yellow flowersPollinators in Peril Pollinator populations are declining worldwide. Find out what challenges pollinators face and how you can help.
 a garden box full of colorful flowers with a sign for a pollinator gardenHelp in Your Backyard Even small changes in our own backyards can help pollinators survive and thrive. Find out how you can help!
 Last updated: June 9, 2022
 The Buzz on Pollinators
 Know Your Pollinators
Featured Species
 See the Bees
National Park Service Bees
 Young Stewards
Young Stewards
 Learn More
Additional Resources
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIntegrated flight/propulsion control system design based on a decentralized, hierarchical approachA sample integrated flight/propulsion control system design is presented for the piloted longitudinal landing task with a modern, statistically unstable fighter aircraft. The design procedure is summarized. The vehicle model used in the sample study is described, and the procedure for partitioning the integrated system is presented along with a description of the subsystems. The high-level airframe performance specifications and control design are presented and the control performance is evaluated. The generation of the low-level (engine) subsystem specifications from the airframe requirements are discussed, and the engine performance specifications are presented along with the subsystem control design. A compensator to accommodate the influence of airframe outputs on the engine subsystem is also considered. Finally, the entire closed loop system performance and stability characteristics are examined.Document ID19910011824Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsMattern, Duane*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Brook Park OH., United States)*Garg, Sanjay*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Brook Park OH., United States)*Bullard, Randy*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberAIAA PAPER 89-3519NASA-TM-103678NAS 1.15:103678E-5895Meeting InformationMeeting: Guidance, Navigation and Control ConferenceLocation: Boston, MACountry: United StatesStart Date: August 14, 1989End Date: August 16, 1989Sponsors:AIAAAccession Number91N21137Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-50Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910011824.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024