alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LASER
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES JUNE 30, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000740726
<NAME> LASER CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         140,084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  425,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                    59,344
<INVENTORY>                                    835,558
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,389,428
<PP&E>                                       1,749,582
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,457,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,836,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,340,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,440
<OTHER-SE>                                     386,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,836,476
<SALES>                                      1,846,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,855,528
<CGS>                                        1,682,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,570,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (714,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (714,786)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (714,786)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.51)


</TABLE>
**
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

In accordance with the SEC’s Regulation S-X, we do not consolidate portfolio company investments. Further, inaccordance with ASC 946, we are precluded from consolidating any entity other than another investment company, except that ASC 946 provides for the consolidation of a controlled operating company that provides substantially all of its services tothe investment company or its consolidated subsidiaries. 

Information consistent with the requirements of Rule4-08 of Regulation S-X to provide summarized, comparative financial information of certain portfolio companies is presented below for LWO Acquisitions Company LLC as ofSeptember 30, 2019 and 2018 and for the years ended September 30, 2019, 2018, and 2017. 

 
      **As of September 30,**      **For the Year Ended September 30,** 
**Portfolio Company**
  
**Balance Sheet**
  **2019**   **2018**   
**Income Statement**
  **2019**  **2018**  **2017** 
LWO Acquisitions Company, LLC
  Current assets  **$****7,714**** **  $8,012   Net sales  **$****19,060**** ** $22,368  $17,496   Noncurrent assets  ** ****10,804**** **   11,843   Gross profit  ** ****2,214**** **  3,060   2,929   Current liabilities  ** ****5,569**** **   5,152   Net (loss) income  ** ****(4,199****) **  (2,573)   (2,695)   Noncurrent liabilities  ** ****16,499**** **   14,849       **
(February 7, 1949.)

#### In the Matter of the Appointment of a Member of the Committee on Character and Fitness of Applicants for Admission to the Bar for the Ninth Judicial District.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-20172-CIV-GAYLES/TORRES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

LENNOY WEBSTER,

Defendant. 

/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Lennoy Webster’s Motion to Dismiss 

Based on Statute of Limitations. [ECF No. 29]. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Edwin 

G. Torres for a Report and Recommendation. [ECF No. 30]. On September 27, 2021, Judge Torres 

issued his Report recommending that the Court deny the Motion to Dismiss. [ECF No. 35]. On 

October 4, 2021, Defendant filed objections to the Report. [ECF No. 36].

A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which 

objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings 

that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see 

also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific 

objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint 

Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 

208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). 

Case 1:20-cr-20172-DPG Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record and agrees with Judge Torres’s 

well-reasoned analysis and conclusion that the Motion should be denied. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) Judge Torres’s Report [ECF No. 35] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED and 

incorporated into this Order by reference; and

(2) Defendant Lennoy Webster’s Motion to Dismiss Based on Statute of Limitations

[ECF No. 29] is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 25th day of October, 2021. 

________________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cr-20172-DPG Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2021 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

US Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Constitution Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Attn: Paul Lewis, Ph.D.

Section 4 Testing of PMDA

Dear Dr. Lewis,

Thank you for your letter informing us of EPA’s concerns that Evonik was not 

complying with the requirements of a TSCA Section 4 test rule for a chemical 

referred to as PMDA [CAS RN 89-32-7]. Upon the issuance of the rule Evonik 

has concluded that we were not covered but now that we have obtained 

additional information from EPA on the intent of the rule we agree that we are 

covered. As a result, Evonik has joined the PMDA HPV Consortium as noted in a 

letter from the Bill Gulledge, the consortium manager, to John Schaefer dated 

March 6, 2014. A copy of the letter is attached.

Please let me know if additional information is needed.

Sincerely yours,

Shaun F. Clancy, Ph.D.

Product Regulatory Services

March 31, 2014

Evonik Corporation 

299 Jefferson Road

Parsippany, New Jersey 07054

www.evonik.com

Phone +1 973 929 8047

Fax +1 973 929 8040

Shaun.Clancy@evonik.com
#### § 3585.2 Other applicable regulations.
**Exhibit 10.44**

**SECOND AMENDMENT**

**TO THE**

**HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.**

**EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN**

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) to the Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan (“Plan”) made effective as of the30th day of December 2008 by Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (“Company”). All capitalized terms in this Amendment not otherwise defined shall have their respective meanings under the Plan. 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to further amend and conform the written terms of the Plan to the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal RevenueCode of 1986, as amended (“Code”), and 

WHEREAS, the Plan has operated in good faith compliance with the requirements ofSection 409A of the Code for periods starting January 1, 2005 and through the effective date of this Amendment, 

NOW, THEREFORE,the Company hereby adopts this Amendment upon the following terms and conditions: 

1. The definition of Change in Control inSection 1.07 shall be replaced in its entirety with the following definition: 

The term “Change in Control” is hereby defined as the date that (i) any one person, or more than one person, acting as a group, acquires ownership of stock of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. that, together with stock held bysuch person or group constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., (b) during any period of twelve consecutive months, individuals who at the beginning of suchperiod constituted the Board and any new directors, whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least three-fourths ( 3/4ths) of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election waspreviously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board, or (c) during any period of twelve consecutive months, (i) any one person, or more than one person, acting as a group, acquires ownership of stock ofHampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. that, together with stock held by such person or group constitutes more than 30% of the total voting power of the stock of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., and (ii) individuals who at the beginning of such periodconstituted the Board cease in connection with such 30% change in voting stock ownership, cease to constitute a majority of the Board. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, the definition of “Change in Control” shall beinterpreted so as to comply with the terms of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder. 

[*SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS*] 

WITNESS the signature of the undersigned officer of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. 

 
HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
 
Jack W. Gibson, Vice Chairman, President & CEO
 
Date Signed
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLDEF Experiment P0006 Linear Energy Transfer Spectrum Measurement (LETSME) quick look reportA preliminary analysis of the various passive radiation detector materials included in the P0006 LETSME experiment flown on LDEF (Long Duration Exposure Facility) is presented. It consists of four tasks: (1) readout and analysis of thermoluminescent detectors (TLD); (2) readout and analysis of fission foil/mica detectors; (3) readout and analysis of (6)LiF/CR-39 detectors; and (4) preliminary processing and readout of CR-39 and polycarbonate plastic nuclear track detectors (PNTD).Document ID19910009910Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 19, 1990Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:184115NASA-CR-184115Accession Number91N19223Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-38188Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009910.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 510

 511

 520

 426

 368

 341

 359

 339

 353

 342

 359

 347

 423

 496

 514

 534

 547

 558

 566

 580

 600

 595

 589

 595

 601

 589

 589

 586

 417

 387

 359

 502

 494

 427

 347

 333

 320

 313

 310

 315

 310

 320

 315

 350

 434

 490

 510

 531

 539

 542

 561

 569

 582

 580

 582

 567

 573

 554

 436

 359

 347

 338

 506

 505

 484

 359

 352

 329

 340

 317

 339

 320

 345

 326

 393

 479

 506

 528

 541

 554

 560

 575

 590

 590

 586

 592

 594

 582

 584

 550

 369

 372

 347

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
### Subpart B—Production

Sec.
5221.
Commencement, suspension, and resumption of operations.
5222.
Production, receipt, removal, and use of distilling materials.
5223.
Redistillation of spirits, articles, and residues.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1965**—Pub. L. 89–44, title VIII, §805(f)(9), June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 161, inserted reference to articles and residues in item 5223.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


    Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
         Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements




         I, Alfred R. Camner, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Humberto L. Lopez,
Chief Financial Officer, of BankUnited Financial Corporation, a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ Alfred R. Camner                        /s/ Humberto L. Lopez
_______________________________             ___________________________________
Alfred R. Camner                            Humberto L. Lopez

             8/13/02                                     8/13/02
Date: _________________________             Date:______________________________
#### § 3830.10 Locatable minerals.
#### In the Matter of the Application for the Probate of the Alleged Will of Floyd Wylie, Deceased.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Lyon, J., not voting.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2007 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Report), we, Jack W. Gibson, Chief Executive
Officer, and Donald W. Fulton, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jack W. GibsonJack W. GibsonChief Executive OfficerDate:    March 11, 2008/s/ Donald W. Fulton, Jr.Donald W. Fulton, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerDate:    March 11, 2008
#### § 3823.0-3 Purpose.

This subpart sets forth procedures to be followed by persons wishing to prospect on lands within National Forest Wilderness, and special provisions pertaining to mineral locations and mineral patents within National Forest Wilderness.
#### § 4.844 Notification of right to file exceptions.

The provisions of § 17.9 of this title govern the making of decisions by administrative law judges, the Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, and the Secretary. An administrative law judge shall, in any initial decision made by him, specifically inform the applicant or recipient of his right under § 17.9 of this title to file exceptions with the Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals. In instances in which the record is certified to the Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, or he reviews the decision of an administrative law judge, he shall give the applicant or recipient a notice of certification or notice of review which specifically informs the applicant or recipient that, within a stated period, which shall not be less than 30 days after service of the notice, he may file briefs or other written statements of his contentions.
### §344. Cancellation of allotment of unsuitable land

If any Indian of a tribe whose surplus lands have been ceded or opened to disposal has received an allotment embracing lands unsuitable for allotment purposes, such allotment may be canceled and other unappropriated, unoccupied, and unreserved land of equal area, within the ceded portions of the reservation upon which such Indian belongs, allotted to him upon the same terms and with the same restrictions as the original allotment, and lands described in any such canceled allotment shall be disposed of as other ceded lands of such reservation. This provision shall not apply to the lands formerly comprising Indian Territory. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to prescribe rules and regulations to carry this law into effect.

(Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 263, 35 Stat. 784.)
### §5511. Establishment and operation

This chapter (other than sections 5178(a)(2)(C), 5179, 5203(b), (c), and (d), and 5552) shall not be applicable with respect to the manufacture, by any process which includes evaporations from the mash or juice of any fruit, of any volatile fruit-flavor concentrate if—

(1) such concentrate, and the mash or juice from which it is produced, contains no more alcohol than is reasonably unavoidable in the manufacture of such concentrate; and

(2) such concentrate is rendered unfit for use as a beverage before removal from the place of manufacture, or (in the case of a concentrate which does not exceed 24 percent alcohol by volume) such concentrate is transferred to a bonded wine cellar for use in production of natural wine as provided in section 5382; and

(3) the manufacturer thereof makes such application, keeps such records, renders such reports, files such bonds, and complies with such other requirements with respect to the production, removal, sale, transportation, and use of such concentrate and of the mash or juice from which such concentrate is produced, as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe as necessary for the protection of the revenue.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1392; amended Pub. L. 88–653, §3, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1085; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5511, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 677, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Par. (3). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

1964—Par. (2). Pub. L. 88–653 inserted "or (in the case of a concentrate which does not exceed 24 percent alcohol by volume) such concentrate is transferred to a bonded wine cellar for use in production of natural wine as provided in section 5382".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1964 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 88–653 effective on first day of second month which begins more than 10 days after Oct. 13, 1964, see section 4 of Pub. L. 88–653, set out as a note under section 5383 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1959, see section 210(a)(1) of Pub. L. 85–859, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION**Certification of President and Principal Financial Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

			Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of the			registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's Annual			Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-K")			fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities			Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K,			fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results			of operations of the registrant.		

June 20, 2011
			 By: /s/ Atsushi Maki					Atsushi Maki					Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, & Chief Financial Officer
### §655. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, §5, 45 Stat. 602, which provided for reimbursement of the State of California for necessary costs and expenses in the event that the court rendered judgment against the United States under the provisions of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00511

- CV

CINTAS CORPORATION

v. DAVID ARRELLANO, INDIVIDUALLY, D/B/A LAS COMADRES RESTAURANT

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No 2 of Cameron County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 2010

- CCL

- 01297

JUDGMENT
THE THIR TEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in favor of Cintas for its liqu idated damages and attorney's fees . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 20, 2014.
### §763. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–227, §4, Apr. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 318; Pub. L. 109–126, §4, Dec. 7, 2005, 119 Stat. 2547, which related to membership roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.