alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-227]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Aging Transport Systems Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a public meeting of the FAA's Aging 
Transport Systems Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ATSRAC).

DATES: The ATSRAC will meet January 21 and 22, 2004, from 8:30 a.m. to 
5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Miami Airbus Training Center, 4355 NW 36th Street, Miami 
Springs, Florida 33166.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shirley Stroman, Office of Rulemaking, 
ARM-208, FAA, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 
telephone (202) 267-7470; fax (202) 267-5075; or e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#70031819021c15095e0304021f1d111e301611115e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82f1eaebf0eee7fbacf1f6f0edefe3ecc2e4e3e3ace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces a meeting of the Aging 
Transport Systems Rulemaking Advisory Committee. The FAA will hold the 
meeting at the location listed under the ADDRESSES heading of this 
notice. The agenda topics for the meeting include--
    [sbull] Status reports of the tasks (68 FR 31741, May 28, 2003) 
assigned to Harmonization Working Groups 11, 12, and 13;
    [sbull] Discussion of the FAA's review of aging airplane rulemaking 
initiatives;
    [sbull] Discussion of electrical wiring in relation to master 
minimum equipment lists; and
    [sbull] Presentation of Awareness Training video by Aircraft 
Electronics Association.
    The meeting is open to the public; however, attendance will be 
limited by the size of the meeting room. The FAA will make the 
following services available if you request them by January 14, 2004:
    [sbull] Teleconferencing;
    [sbull] Sign and oral interpretation; and
    [sbull] A listening device.
    Individuals using the teleconferencing service and calling from 
outside the Washington, DC metropolitan area will be responsible for 
paying long-distance charges. To arrange for any of these services, 
contact the person listed under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
heading of this notice.
    The public may present written statements to the Committee by 
providing 20 copies to the Committee's Executive Director or by 
bringing the copies to the meeting. Public statements will be 
considered if time allows.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 30, 2003.
Tony F. Fazio,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 04-227 Filed 1-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IRIS Bimonthly Meeting

Arlington, VA

December 13, 2013 

Kevin Bromberg
Small Business and IRIS

IRIS has implications for 

regulations and regulatory 

policy
NRC Recommendations (2011)

• Establish Standard Protocols for 

Evidence Identification

• Establish Clear Guidelines for Study 

Selection

• Standardize Presentation of Studies to 

Capture Study Characteristics, WOE and 

Utility for Deriving Unit Risks

• Standardize Approach for WOE
IRIS Enhancements – July 2013

 Step 1 Chemicals

• Publicly releases literature search, 

literature search strategy, critical study 

selection criteria, evidence tables for 

critical studies, and exposure-response 

figures

• Convenes public meeting to discuss 

literature search, evidence tables, 

exposure-response figures and key 

issues
Missing Information

 Critical Study Selection Criteria

 Identification of Critical Studies and 

Rationale for Selection 

 Evidence Tables Presenting the Critical 

Studies

 Identification and Application of WOE 

Factors

 Identification of Key Issues
NRC (2011) Implementation

 July 2013 IRIS enhanced procedures were 

designed to implement the NRC 

recommendations

 EPA adopted strategy of robust early input 

to avoid low quality IRIS assessments

 Proper implementation of enhanced 

procedures is critical to small business 

input
Industry Comments

Previous commenters, including trade 

associations representing small 

businesses, found that EPA generally 

did not fully implement the Step 1 

procedures regarding study quality, 

identification of critical studies and 

weight-of-evidence (WOE) criteria for 

both step 1 and step 4 chemicals.
Conclusions

• Step 1 Chemicals

 EPA Should Supplement Step 1 

Materials with Study Quality Criteria 

and Identification of Critical Studies

 EPA Should Identify Key Issues

 EPA Should Convene New Step 1 

Public Meeting in Accordance with 

Enhanced IRIS Procedures
Conclusions

• Step 4 Chemicals

 EPA Should Modify Assessment to 

Address Inadequacies

 EPA Should Improve Peer Review 

Questions
Additional Comments

EPA Needs to Set Aside Adequate 

Time for Step 1 and Step 4 

Meetings to Ensure Robust 

Dialogue Among Scientists
Additional Comments

Chemical Specific

CAAC Review Committees Need to 

Include Diversity of Viewpoints 

(Not Solely Government and 

Academic)
Contact Information

Kevin Bromberg

Assistant Chief Counsel for

Environmental Policy

SBA Office of Advocacy

Kevin.bromberg@sba.gov

P. 202.205.6964

www.sba.gov/advocacy website
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 514

 479

 502

 494

 474

 481

 469

 463

 451

 440

 442

 414

 401

 396

 400

 415

 411

 415

 404

 390

 405

 412

 414

 407

 414

 412

 415

 429

 442

 427

 420

 404

 397

 391

 386

 384

 386

 386

 385

 381

 373

 370

 373

 369

 366

 365

 367

 369

 370

 361

 362

 365

 364

 366

 369

 370

 375

 381

 380

 383

 387

 387

 423

 419

 418

 412

 411

 414

 410

 406

 404

 394

 388

 384

 380

 378

 376

 378

 382

 383

 378

 372

 377

 380

 381

 381

 386

 388

 391

 393

 395

 397

 395

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 4130.6-3 Crossing permits.

A crossing permit may be issued by the authorized officer to any applicant showing a need to cross the public land or other land under Bureau of Land Management control, or both, with livestock for proper and lawful purposes. A temporary use authorization for trailing livestock shall contain terms and conditions for the temporary grazing use that will occur as deemed necessary by the authorized officer to achieve the objectives of this part.

[60 FR 9967, Feb. 22, 1995]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION  March 31, 1997 financial statements
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894551
<NAME>                        ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6629
SALEEM RAFEEQ PORTER, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus JEFFREY W. FRAZIER, CJM, Superintendent; TED HULL, Major, CJM, Assistant Superintendent, Defendants - Appellees,
and NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-249-AM) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 5, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Saleem Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, THOMPSON & MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Saleem Rafeeq Porter appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Porter v. Frazier , No. CA-03-249-AM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 15, 2004 & entered Mar. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Reclamation 6/21-2002 Draft – Errata Sheet

# (Changes to 5/15 draft are shown in underline-strikeout format; errata in the 6/21 draft and corrections thereto are shown in double underline-strikeout format.)

1.  (b)  “Charges” shall mean the payments for Project Water *as determined annually by the Contracting Officer*which the Contractor is required by Federal Reclamation law to pay to the United States in addition to the Rates specified in this Contract as determined annually by the Contracting Officer pursuant to this Contract.  The type and amount of each Charge shall be specified in Exhibit D;

3.  (b)  The Contractor may have acquired rights to divert water from the Sacramento River during the period April to *through* October, which were obtained after the date of execution of the Existing Contract.  However, all diversions made from the Sacramento River during the period April *through* October are subject to the terms and conditions of this Contract**and *shall not exceed* the quantity of Base Supply and Project Water in the Existing Contract shall not be increased in this Contract *specified in Exhibit A.*

6.  (*lines 9 &10*) The Contractor and United States desire to work together to maximize the reasonable beneficial use of water to *for* their mutual benefit.  

8.  (h)  Except as provided in subsection~~s~~ 3405(a)(1)(B) ~~and 3405(f)~~3407(d)(2)(a) of the CVPIA, the Rates for Project Water transferred, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of, by the Contractor shall be the Contractor’s Rates adjusted upward or downward to reflect the changed costs of delivery (if any) of the transferred, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of Project Water to the transferee’s point of delivery in accordance with the then-current ratesetting policies for the Project.  *Except as provided in subsection 3407(d)(2)(A) of the CVPIA, the Charges for Project Water transferred, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of, by the Contractor shall be the Contractor’s Charges specified in Exhibit D.*  If the Contractor is receiving lower Rates and Charges because of inability to pay and is transferring, exchanging, or otherwise disposing of Project Water to another entity whose Rates and Charges are not adjusted due to inability to pay, the Rates and Charges for transferred, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of Project Water shall be the Contractor’s Rates and Charges unadjusted for ability to pay.
Comparison of Existing Sacramento River Settlement Contract with Draft Renewal Contract(Standard Form Irrigation Contract)

PAGE  

1
§ 3461.0-3 Authority. ( a ) These regulations are issued under the authority of the statutes listed in § 3400.0-3 of this title.
( b ) These regulations primarily implement: ( 1 ) The general unsuitability criteria in section 522(a) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1272(a));
( 2 ) The Federal lands review in section 522(b) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1272(b)); and
( 3 ) The prohibitions against mining certain lands in section 522(e) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1272(e)).
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001

99–694 PDF 2005

S. HRG. 108–494

[ERRATA]

CABLE COMPETITION—INCREASING PRICE;

INCREASING VALUE?

HEARING

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON ANTITRUST, 

COMPETITION POLICY AND CONSUMER RIGHTS

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY 

UNITED STATES SENATE

ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS

SECOND SESSION

FEBRUARY 11, 2004

Serial No. J–108–56

Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary

(

[ERRATA]

On page III, add the following new section:

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 

Responses of Felix L. Boccucci, Jr. to questions submitted by Senators Specter, and Kohl ......................................................................................................... 153

Responses of Scoot Cleland to questions submitted by Senators Specter, and 

Kohl ....................................................................................................................... 162

Responses of Mark Cooper to questions submitted by Senator Kohl .................. 166

Responses of Michael Willner to questions submitted by Senators Specter, 

and Kohl ................................................................................................................ 170

Responses of Coralie Wilson to questions submitted by Senators Specter, 

and Kohl ................................................................................................................ 182

At the end of the hearing, insert the following new pages, 153–226:

153


99694.001
154


99694.002
155


99694.003
156


99694.004
157


99694.005
158


99694.006
159


99694.007
160


99694.008
161


99694.009
162


99694.010
163


99694.011
164


99694.012
165


99694.013
166


99694.074
167


99694.014
168


99694.015
169


99694.016
170


99694.017
171


99694.018
172


99694.019
173


99694.020
174


99694.021
175


99694.022
176


99694.023
177


99694.024
178


99694.025
179


99694.026
180


99694.027
181


99694.028
182


99694.029
183


99694.030
184


99694.031
185


99694.032
186


99694.033
187


99694.034
188


99694.035
189


99694.036
190


99694.037
191


99694.038
192


99694.039
193


99694.040
194


99694.041
195


99694.042
196


99694.043
197


99694.044
198


99694.045
199


99694.046
200


99694.047
201


99694.048
202


99694.049
203


99694.050
204


99694.051
205


99694.052
206


99694.053
207


99694.054
208


99694.055
209


99694.056
210


99694.057
211


99694.058
212


99694.059
213


99694.060
214


99694.061
215


99694.062
216


99694.063
217


99694.064
218


99694.065
219


99694.066
220


99694.067
221


99694.068
222


99694.069
223


99694.070
224


99694.071
225


99694.072
226

Æ


99694.073
#### § 404.55 Who is responsible for the operation, maintenance, and replacement costs?

You will be responsible for 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for any rural water facility that is planned, designed, and recommended for construction under this program.
§ 4.1108 Form of documents. ( a ) Any document filed with OHA in any proceeding brought under the act shall be captioned with— ( 1 ) The names of the parties;
( 2 ) The name of the mine to which the document relates; and
( 3 ) If review is being sought under section 525 of the act, identification by number of any notice or order sought to be reviewed.
( b ) After a docket number has been assigned to the proceeding by OHA, the caption shall contain such docket number.
( c ) The caption may include other information appropriate for identification of the proceeding, including the permit number or OSM identification number.
( d ) Each document shall contain a title that identifies the contents of the document following the caption.
( e ) The original of any document filed with OHA shall be signed by the person submitting the document or by that person's attorney.
( f ) The address and telephone number of the person filing the document or that person's attorney shall appear beneath the signature.
( g ) Documents filed under this subpart must conform to the requirements of § 4.401(d).
[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 75 FR 64669, Oct. 20, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,632,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,843,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,076,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,147,784
<PP&E>                                       2,470,408
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,570,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,408,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,113,883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,309
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,078,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,408,536
<SALES>                                      3,410,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,410,580
<CGS>                                        1,600,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,551,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               235,442
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,506,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,196
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,530,682)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,530,682)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.81)
        

</TABLE>
114 STAT. 494 PUBLIC LAW 106–240—JULY 6, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3699:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 146 (2000):

Mar. 14, considered and passed House.

June 23, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–240

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 8409 Lee

Highway in Merrifield, Virginia, as the ‘‘Joel T. Broyhill Postal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

8409 Lee Highway in Merrifield, Virginia, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Joel T. Broyhill Postal Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joel T.

Broyhill Postal Building’’.

Approved July 6, 2000.

July 6, 2000

[H.R. 3699]
§ 4.1308 Decision by administrative law judge. ( a ) The administrative law judge shall issue a written decision containing findings of fact and conclusions of law on each of the elements set forth in § 4.1307 of this part.
( b ) If the administrative law judge concludes that the individual is liable for an individual civil penalty, he shall order that it be paid in accordance with 30 CFR 724.18 or 846.18, absent the filing of a petition for discretionary review in accordance with § 4.1309 of this part.
M&I 2013 Sch B-3A F.Z17.xlsm

12/01/2014

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF M&I VOLUNTARY PAYMENT AND SURPLUS APPLICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013

A B C D E F G HI J 

Voluntary Payments Applied to Surplus (Annua

Deficit Grand Total to 30-day Construction ARRA Deficit Refun

Current Year Total Sch B-1 Facility/Contractor Prior Year window 

Ref (B+C+D) (E+F) 

Contra Costa Canal

Contra Costa WD $ 324,164.36 $ 324,164.36 $ 324,164.36 

Cow Creek Unit

Bella Vista WD $ 107,9

Folsom D & R

City of Roseville $ - $ 126,294.39 $ 126,294.39 

City of Roseville $ 60,427.41 $ 60,427.41 $ 60,427.41

San Juan WD $ 6,562.03 $ 6,562.03 $ 6,562.03 

Folsom-South Canal

East Bay MUD $ 292,237.62 $ 292,237.62 $ 292,237.62 

Sacramento County WA - FSC $ 860,853.73 $ 860,853.73 $ 860,853.73 

Friant Dam

County of Madera $ 219.39 $ 219.39 $ 219.39 

Friant Kern Canal

Delano-Earlimart ID $ 566.98 $ 566.98 $ 566.98 

Lindsay-Strathmore ID $ 839.06 $ 839.06 $ 839.06 

Shafter-Wasco ID $ 816.23 $ 816.23 $ 816.23 
M&I 2013 Sch B-3A F.Z17.xlsm

12/01/2014

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF M&I VOLUNTARY PAYMENT AND SURPLUS APPLICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013

A B C D E F G HI J 

Voluntary Payments Applied to Surplus (Annua

Deficit Grand Total to 30-day Construction ARRA Deficit Refun

Current Year Total Sch B-1 Facility/Contractor Prior Year window 

Ref (B+C+D) (E+F) 

Sacramento River

City of West Sacramento $ 17,466.08 $ 17,466.08 $ 17,466.08 

60 $ 380.52 $ 380.52 $ 380.52 

Riverview Golf & Country Club $ 47.57 $ 47.57 $ 47.57 

San Felipe Unit

San Benito County WD 1/ $ 2,396.76 $ 2,396.76 $ 2,396.76 

San Luis Canal-Fresno

Westlands WD $ - $ - $ 13,5

Spring Creek Conduit

Shasta CSD $ 1,026.99 $ 1,026.99 $ 1,026.99 $ 

Tehama Colusa Canal

Colusa County WD $ 8

Toyon Pipeline

City of Shasta Lake $ 10,360.00 $ 10,360.00 $ 10,360.00 

City of Shasta Lake $ 1,166.57 $ 1,166.57 $ 1,166.57 

City of Shasta Lake $ 2,546.28 $ 2,546.28 $ 2,546.28 

City of Shasta Lake $ 2,389.98 $ 2,389.98 $ 2,389.98 

Total $ 860,853.73 $ 18,859.59 $ 704,754.24 $ 1,584,467.56 $ 126,294.39 $ 1,710,761.95 $ - $ - $ 122,3

Footnotes:

1/ $34,501.11 was received in July 2012. Of this amount $32,104.35 was included in 2012 and $2,396.76 in 2013.