alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        10
<OTHER-SE>                      (10)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-BASIC>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

Travel American Utopias
EXHIBIT 3

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 1 of 2
 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. 

 IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. 

DIVISION 

 CIVIL  OTHER 

 DISTRICTS 

SUMMONS 20 DAY CORPORATE SERVICE 

(a) GENERAL FORMS 

CASE NUMBER

2020-007685-CA-01

PLAINTIFF(S) 

Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A.,

New York Branch, Brown Brothers

Harriman & Co., et al.,

VS. DEFENDANT(S) SERVICE 

THE STATE OF FLORIDA: 

To Each Sheriff of the State: 

YOU ARE COMMANDED to serve this summons and copy of the complaint or petition in this 

action on defendant(s): EISNERAMPER LLP c/o Registered Agent, Corporate Service 

Company, 1201 Hays Street, Tallahassee, FL 32301.

Each defendant is required to serve written defense to the complaint or petition on 

Plaintiff’s Attorney: Scott Jay Feder, Esq.

Scott Jay Feder, P.A.

CLOCK IN 

whose address is: 4649 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Suite 402, Coral Gables, FL 33146

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

within 20 days “ Except when suit is brought pursuant to s. 768.28, Florida Statutes, if the State of Florida, one of its agencies, 

or one of its officials or employees sued in his or her official capacity is a defendant, the time to respond shall be 40 days. 

When suit is brought pursuant to. 768.28, Florida Statutes, the time to respond shall be 30 days.” after service of this summons 

on that defendant , exclusive of the day of service, and to file the original of the defenses with the Clerk of this Clerk Court either before 

service on Plaintiff’s attorney or immediately thereafter. If a defendant fails to do so, a default will be entered against that defendant for 

the relief demanded in the complaint or petition. 

HARVEY RUVIN

CLERK of COURTS DEPUTY CLERK

DATE

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990

ADA NOTICE

“If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, 

at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court’s ADA Coordinator, 

Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse Center, 175 NW 1st Ave., Suite 2702, Miami, FL 33128, Telephone (305) 349-7175; TDD (305) 

349-7174, Fax (305) 349-7355 at least 7 days before your scheduled court appearance, or immediately upon receiving this 

notification if the time before the scheduled appearance is less than 7 days; if you are hearing or voice impaired, call 711.”

CLK/CT. 314 Rev. 02/16 Clerk’s web address: www.miami-dadeclerk.com

Filing # 105943153 E-Filed 04/07/2020 10:12:48 AM Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 3260.11 What general standards apply to my drilling operations? Your drilling operations must: ( a ) Meet all environmental and operational standards;
( b ) Prevent unnecessary impacts on surface and subsurface resources;
( c ) Conserve geothermal resources and minimize waste;
( d ) Protect public health, safety, and property; and
( e ) Comply with the requirements of § 3200.4.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIAPSA 2 small-scale system specificationThe details of a hardware implementation of a representative small scale flight critical system is described using Advanced Information Processing System (AIPS) building block components and simulated sensor/actuator interfaces. The system was used to study application performance and reliability issues during both normal and faulted operation.Document ID19900014787Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCohen, Gerald C.*(Boeing Advanced Systems Co. Seattle, WA, United States)*Torkelson, Thomas C.*(Boeing Advanced Systems Co. Seattle, WA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategorySystems AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-182006NAS 1.26:182006Accession Number90N24103Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18099PROJECT: RTOP 505-66-71-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014787.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 4.1101 Jurisdiction of the Board. ( a ) The jurisdiction of the Board, as set forth in § 4.1(b)(3), and subject to §§ 4.21(d) and 4.5, includes the authority to exercise the final decisionmaking power of the Secretary under the act pertaining to— ( 1 ) Applications for review of decisions by OSM regarding determinations concerning permits for surface coal mining operations pursuant to section 514 of the act;
( 2 ) Petitions for review of proposed assessments of civil penalties issued by OSM pursuant to section 518 of the act;
( 3 ) Applications for review of notices of violation and orders of cessation or modifications, vacations, or terminations thereof, issued pursuant to section 521(a)(2) or section 521(a)(3) of the act;
( 4 ) Proceedings for suspension or revocation of permits pursuant to section 521(a)(4) of the act;
( 5 ) Applications for review of alleged discriminatory acts filed pursuant to section 703 of the act;
( 6 ) Applications for temporary relief;
( 7 ) Petitions for award of costs and expenses under section 525(e) of the act;
( 8 ) Preliminary findings concerning a demonstrated pattern of willful violations under section 510(c) of the act;
( 9 ) Suspension or rescission of improvidently-issued permits;
( 10 ) Challenges to ownership or control listings or findings;
( 11 ) Determinations under 30 CFR part 761;
( 12 ) Appeals from orders or decisions of administrative law judges; and
( 13 ) All other appeals and review procedures under the act which are permitted by these regulations.
( b ) In performing its functions under paragraph (a) of this section, the Board is authorized to— ( 1 ) Order hearings; and
( 2 ) Issue orders to secure the just and prompt determination of all proceedings.
[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 67 FR 61509, Oct. 1, 2002]
§ 3715.2 What activities do I have to be engaged in to allow me to occupy the public lands? In order to occupy the public lands under the mining laws for more than 14 calendar days in any 90-day period within a 25-mile radius of the initially occupied site, you must be engaged in certain activities. Those activities that are the reason for your occupancy must: ( a ) Be reasonably incident;
( b ) Constitute substantially regular work;
( c ) Be reasonably calculated to lead to the extraction and beneficiation of minerals;
( d ) Involve observable on-the-ground activity that BLM may verify under § 3715.7; and
( e ) Use appropriate equipment that is presently operable, subject to the need for reasonable assembly, maintenance, repair or fabrication of replacement parts.
§ 3602.21 What payment terms apply to my mineral materials sales contract? ( a ) Under a sales contract for mineral materials— ( 1 ) For sales of $2,000 or less, you must pay the full amount before BLM will sign the contract.
( 2 ) When the sale exceeds $2,000, you may make installment payments. The first installment payment must be the greater of $500 or 5 percent of the total purchase price. If you elect to make installment payments— ( i ) For non-competitive sales, you must pay the first installment at or before the time BLM awards the contract;
( ii ) For competitive sales, you must pay the first installment as a deposit at the time you submit the bid; and
( iii ) For noncompetitive and competitive sales— ( A ) Once you have removed materials, you must make each subsequent installment payment monthly in an amount equal to the value of the minerals you remove each month. You must make the payment by the 15th day following the end of the month for which you are reporting. However, you must pay the balance of the purchase price not later than 60 days before the expiration date of the contract. BLM will credit your first installment payment to you at the time of your final payment unless we cancel your contract under § 3601.61; or
( B ) You may make advance payment for your annual production based on the previous year's production or your projection of the current year's production, so long as you resume paying on a monthly basis as required in paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(A) of this section if your annual payment does not cover your actual production for the current year. You must resume monthly payments no later than the 15th day following the end of the month in which production exceeds the projected production on which payments were based.
( 3 ) You must annually (as provided in your contract) produce an amount sufficient to pay to the United States a sum of money equal to the first installment determined under paragraph (a)(2) of this section. In lieu of such production, you may make an annual payment in the amount of the first installment. If in any contract year you make production payments that are less than the first installment, you must pay the difference between the production payments and the amount of the first installment. These annual payments are due on or before each anniversary date of the contract.
( b ) If you fail to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract and BLM cancels your contract under § 3601.61, you will forfeit all moneys that you paid.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           143,700
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     110,297
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 283,339
<CASH>                                             653
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              15,547
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 329,691
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                113,802
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             31,292
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            5,102
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,525
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   329,691
<PREMIUMS>                                      21,085
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              6,041
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,330
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   3,274
<BENEFITS>                                      20,643
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             4,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                       208
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,228
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,228
<EPS-BASIC>                                      66.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    59.72
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
MARJORIE K. CONNER

ATTORNEY

700 WEST VIEW TERRACE

ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22302 

MAY 4, 2015 

703-706-5917 

mkconner@mkconnerlaw.com 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

 Re: OpenSky Drones, LLC 

 Petitions for Exemption under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-117, 119, 121, 122, 124, and 220 

Dear USDOT: 

 Earlier today, OpenSky Drones, LLC (“OSD”), received an inquiry about its petitions for 

exemption pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (“Reform 

Act”), and Section 11.81 of the FAA’s rules, 14 C.F.R. § 11.81. Those filings were assigned the 

Regulatory Docket Numbers captioned above. 

Your inquiry asked that OSD describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. 

fixed wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) 

should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual(s). 

 OSD proposes to use a four different aircraft, but the maximum weight (including 

payload) on any flight will be 55 pounds or less. OSD’s proposed aircraft are: 

DJI S1000 Spreading Wings DJI 450 Flame Wheel Quadcopter 

DJI Inspire DJI 550 Flame Wheel Hexacopter 

With this filing, OSD also submits its revised OpenSky Drones Manual (“Manual”) for 

operations under the exemption. OSD requests confidential treatment of its Manual. 

 Please give me a call with any questions or concerns about OSD’s petitions or this letter. 

 Very truly yours, 

 

 Marjorie K. Conner 

 Counsel for OpenSky Drones, LLC 

cc: OpenSky Drones, LLC 
OpenSky Drones Manual

Confidential Treatment Requested
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo VERA-BEDOLLA, also known as Geraldo Vera-Bedolla, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40926.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern Distriet of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gerardo Vera-Bedolla raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### PART II—MITIGATION OF EFFECT OF LIMITATIONS AND OTHER PROVISIONS

Sec.
1311.
Correction of error.
1312.
Circumstances of adjustment.
1313.
Definitions.
1314.
Amount and method of adjustment.
[1315.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(b)(35), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1802, struck out item 1315 "Effective date".
SCPW-23-0000586

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

CATHERINE M. SHYNE,

Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE KATHLEEN N.A. WATANABE,

Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit,

State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge,

and

TBC KOLOA TOWN LLC, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CASE NO. 5CCV-21-0000032)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ.,

Circuit Judge Remigio and Circuit Judge Souza,

assigned by reason of vacancies)

Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus, 

filed on October 16, 2023 (Petition), the documents attached and 

submitted in support, and the record, Petitioner Catherine M. 

Shyne failed to establish a “clear and indisputable right to the 

relief requested and a lack of other means to redress adequately 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-23-0000586

20-OCT-2023

11:32 AM

Dkt. 22 ODDP
2

the alleged wrong or to obtain the requested action.” See Kema 

v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999). 

Here, depending on the outcome of the hearings in the 

underlying post-judgment proceeding it appears Petitioner could 

pursue normal appellate procedures to challenge any purported 

error by the circuit court. See e.g., Ditto v. McCurdy, 103 

Hawaiʻi 153, 157, 80 P.3d 974, 978 (2003) (discussing postjudgment orders and when they may be appealed); Harada v. Ellis, 

60 Haw. 467, 480, 591 P.2d 1060, 1070 (1979) (discussing the 

collateral order doctrine and contempt). It is well-established 

that a petition for writ of mandamus is not meant to serve as a 

legal remedy in lieu of normal appellate procedure. See Kema, 

91 Hawaiʻi at 204, 982 P.2d at 338. 

Next, based on a review of the record it cannot be said 

that the circuit court committed a flagrant and manifest abuse 

of discretion in scheduling the hearing dates at the same time.

Here, a number of hearings related to the debtor examination

occurred before the upcoming October 25, 2023 hearing, yet 

despite receiving notice of these hearings through the Judiciary 

Electronic Filing System (JEFS), counsel for Petitioner failed 

to appear. See Rules of the Circuit Courts of the State of

Hawaiʻi, Rule 15(b) (“Expedition of Court Business”); see also

Electronic Filing and Service Rules, Rule 6 (“The Notice of 

Electronic Filing automatically generated by JEFS and JIMS 
3

constitutes service of the electronically filed document to JEFS 

Users.”). In short, as to this ground and based on the 

circumstances raised by Petitioner, we decline to entertain the 

petition.

In sum, none of the arguments made by Petitioner support 

the issuance of the requested writ. In so holding, we do not 

decide any question as to the merits. 

The burden was on Petitioner to establish the extraordinary 

circumstances to warrant mandamus. We find that Petitioner 

failed to carry this burden. 

It is ordered that the Petition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 20, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Catherine H. Remigio

/s/ Kevin A.K. Souza
Exhibit 4.2


Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm


We have issued
our report dated March 26, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2061 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-251346) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


March 26, 2021
#### § 4750.1 Private maintenance.

The authorized officer shall make available for private maintenance all healthy excess wild horses or burros for which an adoption demand by qualified individuals exists.
!

!

 ̈§¦25

 ̈§¦90

 ̈§¦90

 ̈§¦80

Hot Springs

Yellowstone

National Park

Washakie

Sheridan

Goshen

Niobrara

Weston

Laramie

Big Horn

Platte

Uinta

Converse

Crook

Johnson

Teton

Campbell

Lincoln

Sublette

Albany

Natrona

Sweetwater Carbon

Fremont

Park

Casper

Cheyenne

Oil and Gas Project Locations

in Southwest Wyoming

Map 4-3

Cumulative Impact Analysis Area (CIAA)

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

0 10 20 40 60 80 100

Miles

0 15 30 60 90 120 150

Kilometers

Southwest Wyoming Oil and

Gas Development Projects

Pinedale Planning Area

Wyoming
§ 3213.16 May BLM cancel my lease? ( a ) BLM may cancel your lease if it was issued in error.
( b ) If BLM cancels your lease because it was issued in error, the cancellation is effective when you receive it.
#### Paul Dickerson, Appellant, v. Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
Exhibit 4.419

 

/Emblem of the Russian Federation/

 

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION IN THE SPHERE OF COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MASS MEDIA

 

LICENSE

 

No. 182091 dated June 17, 2020

 

For Rendering

 

Telecommunication services for provision of communication channels

 

This License is granted to

 

Public Joint Stock Company

 

Mobile TeleSystems

 

Primary State Registration Number of a Legal Entity 
 (Individual Entrepreneur) (OGRN, OGRNIP)

 

1027700149124

 

Tax Identification Number (TIN)

 

7740000076

 











 

Location address (place of residence):

 

4, Marksistskaya str., Moscow, 109147

 

The territory covered by telecommunications services is specified in the Appendix.

 

This License is granted for a term:

 

until June 17, 2025.

 

This License is granted by decision of the licensing body - Order dated April 06, 2020 No. 145-pчc

 

Appendix being an integral part of this license is executed on 2 sheets.

 

	
Deputy Head
    	
/signature/ A.A.   Pankov
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Stamp   here
    	
 
    
	
Official seal:
    	
 
    
	
MINISTRY OF TELECOM AND MASS
    	
 
    
	
COMMUNICATIONS
    	
 
    
	
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
    	
 
    
	
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION
    	
 
    
	
IN THE SPHERE
    	
 
    
	
OF COMMUNICATIONS,
    	
 
    
	
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    	
 
    
	
AND MASS MEDIA
    	
 
    
	
PSRN 1087746736296
    	
 
    


 

CN 119149