alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### PHANTOM 3 P ROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 6 . 15 Overview : 1. All - in - One Firmware version updated to : v1. 2.6 

### Major Updates : 1. Anti - distortion feature added for images and non - 4K videos. 2. Various bug fixes.

### PHANTOM 3 P ROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 5 . 22 Overview : 1. All - in - One Firmware version updated to : v1. 1.9 

### Major Updates : 1. Fixed issue of some aircraft unable to determine their altitudes. 2. Fixed issue of the DJI Pilot app unable to obtain and display battery error history. 3. Fixed issue of the compass calibration progress not being displayed properly. 

### Notice :  Users are advised to update the firmware version to v1.1.9, otherwise future firmware will not be able to install.  Users may skip updating the remote controller if they have already updated the firmware to v1.1.8, as the latest firmware update does not af fect the remote controller.


### 201 5 . 5 . 8 Overview : 2. All - in - One Firmware version updated to : v1. 1.8 

### Major Updates : 1. Fixed the issue of failure to update the firmware if the remote controller is turned off. 

### Notice :  Users are advised to update the firmware version to v1.1.8, otherwise future firmware will not be able to install.  Re - link the remote controller to the aircraft if the connection is lost after the firmware update .

### PHANTOM 3 P ROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 5 . 6 Overview : 1. All - in - One F irmware version updated to : v1. 1.6 2. DJI Pilot app iOS version updated to: v1.1.1 3. DJI Pilot app Android version updated to: v1.1.0 

### Major Updates : Updated to be compatible with the iOS version of the DJI Pilot app. 

### Notice : Re - link the remote controller to the aircraft if the connection is lost after the firmware upgrade.
Exhibit 10.2


 





 


 






    	 	1	 



     

    

 


 


 


 






    	 	2	 



     

    

 


 


 


 


 






    	 	3	 



     

    

 


 


 


 


 



    	 	4
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications. Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. (Historicalpurposes)
**Title:****Geologic map of Gunnison GorgeNational Conservation Area: Delta and Montrose counties, Colorado**
 
SuDoc: I19.91/3:2825
Item Number:0619-G-33
CGP systemNumber: 000576872
 
For viewing and printing:
 
SIM PDF file (10.5 MB)
Text Only Version (This PDFversion of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)
 
Metadata
 
Geospatial database is available for download in twooptional formats of compression.- 2825.tar.gz2825.zipgunn_dem10.tar.gzgunn_dem10.zip
 
 
February19, 2020
#### Marian Low, Individually and as Sole Executrix of A. Augustus Low, Deceased, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Neoware Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith D. Schneck,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




                            /s/ KEITH D. SCHNECK
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Keith D. Schneck
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                            (Principal Financial Officer)
                            May 10, 2005

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as an exhibit to the Report and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### **Subchapter B—Insured and Self-Insured Health Plans**

Sec.
4375.
Health insurance.
4376.
Self-insured health plans.
4377.
Definitions and special rules.
### §701. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 733, §11, 68 Stat. 726, which related to advances and expenditures from tribal funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
NO. 07-06-0095-CR

					NO. 07-06-0096-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	APRIL 12, 2006

	______________________________

	JACKIE KAY RIGDON, 

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NOS. 17,485-A & 17,486-A; HON. HAL MINER, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	Order of Dismissal

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	 Appellant, Jackie Kay Rigdon, appeals his convictions for theft over $20,000 but less than $100,000 in cause number 17,485-A and for evading detention in cause number 17,486- A.  The certifications of appeal executed by the trial court disclose that appellant does not have a right to appeal in either case due to his waiver of same as part of a plea bargain.  The trial court having so certified, we must dismiss the appeals.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (requiring that the appeal be dismissed if a certification that shows that the defendant has a right to appeal has not been made part of the record).

	Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed. 

							Brian Quinn 	

						          Chief Justice

Do not publish.
(No. 1087

Claimant awarded $4,269.74.)

#### Grennan Bakeries, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 19, 1927.*

*Corporation*— initial *fee. When refund made for overpayment.*Where by an oversight of the Secretary of State claimant was required to pay a larger initial fee than the State is entitled to receive, a refund of the overpayment will be awarded.

James L. Brown, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

.Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

This claim is for the return to claimant of the sum of $4269.74 paid to the Secretary of State to cover the initial fee due the State on the increase of its capital stock. It appears from the record in the case that on June 22, 1925, claimant paid the Secretary of State an initial fee of $4269.74 covering its increased capitalization, and again on June 30, 1925, paid him an initial fee of $5037.09 to cover the same increased capitalization.' The last payment appears to be the correct amount due the State, and claimant should have been credited with the first payment and have been required to pay only the difference between the amount paid June 22nd, and the correct amount of fee due. By some oversight in the office of the Secretary of State, this was not done, and claimant was required to pay $4,269.74 more than was due. This the Secretary of State admits in a letter attached to the declaration as an exhibit. In a letter to the Attorney General, a copy of which the Attorney General has filed in the case, the Secretary of State says the facts shown in the declaration and exhibits are true and that claimant is entitled to a return of the amount claimed in its declaration.

The Attorney General first filed a demurrer to the declaration, but after investigation filed a statement including the copy of the letter from the Secretary of State above mentioned.

As it is clear claimant paid the State $4,269.74 more than was due, the demurrer is overruled and claimant is allowed an award for that amount.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AT 03/31/99 (UNAUDITED)
AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 03/31/99
(UNAUDITED). IT IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                     35905
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             35905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     306009
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                             48000000
<COMMON>                                   17950
<OTHER-SE>                             (48288054)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               35905
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           54724
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (54724)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (54724)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              (54724)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
(No. 28

Claimant awarded $1,921.87.)

#### Mudge & Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Franchise *tax*— refund *when erroneously paj,d.*Where a franchise tax has been erroneously paid the court may upon grounds of social justice and equity award a refund.

Sims, Welch, Godman & Stranksy, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; Floyd E. Britton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for the recovery of franchise tax, erroneously paid to the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois, by claimant, in the years 1920, 1921 and 1922, amounting in all to $1,921.87.

Demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, is, as a matter of law, sustained.

On the grounds of equity and social justice, we award claimant the sum of $1,921.87.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           7,479                       0
<SECURITIES>                                    32,026                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,517                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,377                       0
<PP&E>                                           1,910                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     168                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,406                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,196                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            65                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,145                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,406                       0
<SALES>                                          4,217                  11,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,127                  11,348
<CGS>                                              528                   1,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,551                  10,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (86)                   (114)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)                   (.02)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22686]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Global Positioning 
System will meet in closed session on October 25, 2004, and November 
22, 2004, at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, 
VA. The Task Force will review a range of issues dealing with Galileo 
(or some other future radio navigation satellite system) and provide 
recommendations to address these issues.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will address: Provision 
of capabilities and services within GPS to ensure its viability in 
commercial markets; the impact on frequency spectrum use, signal 
waveforms and power management; access and denial issues throughout the 
spectrum of conflict; possible alternatives to a global radio 
navigation system including the development of small compact timing 
devices and/or navigation units; and vulnerabilities and upgrade 
strategies for all global radio navigation satellite systems (GRNSS). 
In addition, the Task Force will assess areas in which DoD should seek 
strong partnership relationships outside DoD, both within government 
and industry. It will recommend research and development areas that are 
uniquely in DoD interest and might not be accomplished by the private 
sector.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, these 
meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: October 4, 2004.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-22686 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA fast, preconditioned conjugate gradient Toeplitz solverA simple factorization is given of an arbitrary hermitian, positive definite matrix in which the factors are well-conditioned, hermitian, and positive definite. In fact, given knowledge of the extreme eigenvalues of the original matrix A, an optimal improvement can be achieved, making the condition numbers of each of the two factors equal to the square root of the condition number of A. This technique is to applied to the solution of hermitian, positive definite Toeplitz systems. Large linear systems with hermitian, positive definite Toeplitz matrices arise in some signal processing applications. A stable fast algorithm is given for solving these systems that is based on the preconditioned conjugate gradient method. The algorithm exploits Toeplitz structure to reduce the cost of an iteration to O(n log n) by applying the fast Fourier Transform to compute matrix-vector products. Matrix factorization is used as a preconditioner.Document ID19900015415Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsPan, Victor*(State Univ. of New York Albany., United States)*Schrieber, Robert*(Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst. Troy, NY., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1989Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:180367NASA-CR-180367RIACS-TR-89.14Accession Number90N24731Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-387CONTRACT_GRANT: DAAL03-86-K-0112CONTRACT_GRANT: PSC-CUNY-668541CONTRACT_GRANT: N00014-86-K-0610CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF CCR-88-05782Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015415.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3838.15 How do I benefit from properly submitting a NOITL on SRHA lands? ( a ) For a 90-day period after you submit a NOITL with BLM and 30 days after you give notice to the surface owner: ( 1 ) You may enter the lands covered by the NOITL to explore for minerals and locate mining claims (see § 3838.10 for location procedures);
( 2 ) You may cause only minimal disturbance of the surface resources on the lands covered by the NOITL;
( 3 ) You must not use mechanized earthmoving equipment, explosives, or toxic or hazardous materials; and
( 4 ) You must not construct roads or drill pads.
( b ) For 90 days after BLM accepts your NOITL, no other person, including the surface owner, may— ( 1 ) Submit a NOITL for any lands included in your NOITL;
( 2 ) Explore for minerals or locate a mining claim on the lands included in your NOITL; or
( 3 ) File an application to acquire any interest under section 209 of FLPMA and part 2720 of this chapter in the lands included in your NOITL.
( c ) If you file a plan of operations under subpart 3809 of this chapter with BLM, as provided in Section 1 of the Act of April 16, 1993, 43 U.S.C. 299(b), within the 90-day period, BLM will extend the effects of the 90-day period until BLM approves or denies the plan of operations under subpart 3809.
( d ) Before you conduct mineral activities, you must post a bond or other financial guarantee to cover completion of reclamation (see subpart 3809 of this chapter), compensation to the surface owner for permanent damages to the surface and loss or impairment of the surface, and to cover permanent loss of income due to reduction in the owner's use of the land.
U

. S

. D epa rtm e nt of T ra n spo rt a ti o n Federal Av i at io n Administration 

## JAN 1 9 2016

M r . Adam Coo li dge , P
. Eng. Ce 11itic ation Man ager B/ E Ae ro s pac e Lim ite d 25 Dunl op A venue Winnipeg
. M B R2X 2V2 Canada

Dea r Mr
. Coo l id ge: Transport A i rp l ane D i rectorate 1601 Lind Avenue

. S.W

. Ren ton , Washington 98057-3356

Exemption 1 o. 1 0422A Reg ul atory D oc ket No. FAA- 20 1 1-1052

This lette r i s t o inf o rm you that we ha ve a m e nd ed exe mption no. 104 22. It explai ns the basis fo r o ur decision and descri bes its effect. 

### The Ba s is for Our Decis i on B y letter file n o. J905 to the FAA dated October 2, 2015
. Mr. Adam Coolidge p etitioned the Federal Av i at ion Ad mini s tra t io n (FAA). on be h a lf of B / E Ae r ospace , lor a pet i tioner-name c ha n ge to exemp ti on no. I 0422 , in s upp o rt or curre nt a nd fu ture FAA validat io n s of T r ansport Canada Civ il Aviation s uppl e m e nt al t ype certificates (STC) he ld by B / E Ae rospace Ltd. Exe mption n o. l 0422 p rovi d es re lief from T it le 1 4, Co de of Federal Regulations 25.8 1 3(e). as part of th e type-certi f icat ion b asis for the design chan ge , to allow interio r d oo r s i n th e passenge r cabin of B ombard ie r Aerospace Model C L- 600

- 28 19 a irp lan es . This amended exemption n o. I 042 2 A chan ges the petition e r name in the exe m ption f r om ACS

- AI Ltd. to B / E Aerospace Ltd. Other than reque s ting the STC holder name c h a n ge in the s u bject exemp ti on , you r petition includ es no req u es t l · o r substa nti ve change s in th e cond ition s. nor in th e r easo n s re lati ve to publ ic i nte res t a nd safe ty , w h ich we re th e b as i s for g ranting th e orig inal exe mption
. 

### Federal Reg is te r Publi cation Th e FAA has determined th at good cau s e exi s t s fo r not publishing a s ummary of the petition in the 

### Fe deral R eg ist e r for public comment b e cau s e the requested amendme n t t o the exe mp tio n would not s et a precedent.

### Our Decision 

### The FAA has determin ed that the justification for the i ss uance of exemption no. I0422 remains va lid with respect to this amendment and is in th e public intere s t. Ther efo r e, under the authority pro v id ed by 4 9 U
. S.C. 4 01 13 and 44 70 I , which the FAA Admin is trator has del ega ted to me , I grant an amendment to exe mpti on no. I 04 22 to accommodate a name c hange as that name affec t s the s upplemental type ce rtificate for Bombard ie r Aerospace Mod e l CL

- 600-28 19 airplanes m od ifi ed by B / E Aerospace Ltd. The E ff ect of Our Deci s i o n 

### All other condi tions and I im itations of exe mption no. I0422 remain th e sa m e . Th is letter mu s t be att ached to. and i s a part oC exempt i on no. 104 22. S incerely ,

Michael Kaszycki Act ing Manager , Transpo rt Airp lane Directo rat e Aircraft Certification Se r v i

ce 2