alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 867

Claimant awarded $500.00.)

#### F. H. Noble & Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Franchise *tax*— when *refund may he made.*There being no dispute as to the law and facts in this case, the court enters an award in favor of claimant.

Robert F. Kolb, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Edward C. Fitch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an action for a refund of franchise tax which it is alleged was paid by claimant in error to the Secretary of State for the years 1923 and 1924. It appears to the court from the record that there should be a refund as claimed and the Attorney General coming in files his stipulation admitting that claimant is in equity and good conscience entitled to a refund in the sum of $500.00.

Therefore it is recommended by this court that claimant be allowed the sum of $500.00.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 20, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Michelin

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on March 2, 2011 between Michelin, DOT, and

EPA and included the following individuals:

Michelin: Stan Lew, Don Baldwin, Porter Jones, Lisa Bechtel, and Calvin Bradley

DOT: Maurice Hicks, Coralie Cooper

EPA: Byron Bunker, Chien Sze, Cheryl Bynum, Joseph Bachman, Don Kopinski, and 

Angela Cullen

The discussion focused on sharing information related to the following:

 The current rolling resistance level of tires in today’s vocational segment

 The development process for tires, including the balancing of performance attributes 

such as traction, tread wear, and rolling resistance

 The proposed off-road tire exemption

 Reference labs and alignment tires for rolling resistance testing
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATE
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Internet Commerce Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our report about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial report which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Thomas J. StallingsThomas J. StallingsChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDIO TRUST


Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Sec.  (c)(6) of the Presidio Trust Act, 16 
U.S.C. 460bb note, Title I of Pub. L. 104-333, 110 Stat. 4097, as 
amended, and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's bylaws, notice is 
hereby given that a public meeting of the Presidio Trust Board of 
Directors will be held commencing 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, November 4, 
2004, at the Officers' Club, 50 Moraga Avenue, Presidio of San 
Francisco, California. The Presidio Trust was created by Congress in 
1996 to manage approximately eighty percent of the former U.S. Army 
base known as the Presidio, in San Francisco, California.
    The purposes of this meeting are to provide the Executive 
Director's report and to receive public comment regarding the Draft 
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Public Health 
Service Hospital project.
    Accommodation: Individuals requiring special accommodation at this 
meeting, such as needing a sign language interpreter, should contact 
Mollie Matull at (415) 561-5300 prior to October 25, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Cook, General Counsel, the 
Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, PO Box 29052, San Francisco, 
California 94129-0052, Telephone: (415) 561-5300.

    Dated: October 1, 2004.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 04-22560 Filed 10-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
### **Subchapter C—Miscellaneous Provisions**

Sec.
4421.
Definitions.
4422.
Applicability of Federal and State laws.
4423.
Inspection of books.
4424.
Disclosure of wagering tax information.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1974**—Pub. L. 93–499, §3(c)(2), Oct. 29, 1974, 88 Stat. 1551, added item 4424.
§ 46.150 Emergency responses. This section applies only if the Responsible Official determines that an emergency exists that makes it necessary to take urgently needed actions before preparing a NEPA analysis and documentation in accordance with the provisions in subparts D and E of this part. ( a ) The Responsible Official may take those actions necessary to control the immediate impacts of the emergency that are urgently needed to mitigate harm to life, property, or important natural, cultural, or historic resources. When taking such actions, the Responsible Official shall take into account the probable environmental consequences of these actions and mitigate foreseeable adverse environmental effects to the extent practical.
( b ) The Responsible Official shall document in writing the determination that an emergency exists and describe the responsive action(s) taken at the time the emergency exists. The form of that documentation is within the discretion of the Responsible Official.
( c ) If the Responsible Official determines that proposed actions taken in response to an emergency, beyond actions noted in paragraph (a) of this section, are not likely to have significant environmental impacts, the Responsible Official shall document that determination in an environmental assessment and a finding of no significant impact prepared in accordance with this part, unless categorically excluded (see subpart C of this part). If the Responsible Official finds that the nature and scope of the subsequent actions related to the emergency require taking such proposed actions prior to completing an environmental assessment and a finding of no significant impact, the Responsible Official shall consult with the Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance about alternative arrangements for NEPA compliance. The Assistant Secretary, Policy Management and Budget or his/her designee may grant an alternative arrangement. Any alternative arrangement must be documented. Consultation with the Department must be coordinated through the appropriate bureau headquarters.
( d ) The Department shall consult with CEQ about alternative arrangements as soon as possible if the Responsible Official determines that proposed actions, taken in response to an emergency, beyond actions noted in paragraph (a) of this section, are likely to have significant environmental impacts. The Responsible Official shall consult with appropriate bureau headquarters and the Department, about alternative arrangements as soon as the Responsible Official determines that the proposed action is likely to have a significant environmental effect. Such alternative arrangements will apply only to the proposed actions necessary to control the immediate impacts of the emergency. Other proposed actions remain subject to NEPA analysis and documentation in accordance with this part.
• ANGOON, ALASKA 99820 • 

October 25, 2012 

Michael Martin 

US Department Transportation 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

120 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Martin, 

788-3821 

··. ,: 

The City Angoon is aware that our scheduled air service provider Alaska Seaplane Service lLC is 

expanding fleet adding five seat float~equipped Cessna 206. City fully the addition of 

this aircraft to the Alaska Seaplanes fleet use in scheduled flights 

Service program. 

Sincerely, 

Ric ar 

Mayor 

City of Angoon
§ 49.130 When and how may a permit be modified, suspended, revoked, or cancelled? ( a ) *Modification.* The Federal land manager may modify a permit at the permittee's request; or when resource, safety, or other administrative or management reasons make permit modification appropriate; or when there is a violation or a potential violation of a term or condition of a permit issued under this part.
( b ) *Suspension.* The Federal land manager may suspend for up to 45 days activities under the permit when resource, safety, or other administrative or management reasons make permit suspension appropriate, or when the permittee violates a term or condition of the permit. If the issue prompting suspension is not resolved within the 45-day period, the Federal land manager may modify, revoke, or cancel the permit as appropriate to the specific circumstance.
( c ) *Revocation.* The Federal land manager may revoke a permit when the permittee violates a term or condition of a permit, is later found to be ineligible for the permit, or fails to take the actions necessary for ending a suspension. The Federal land manager will revoke a permit immediately if any person working under the authority of the permit is convicted of a criminal offense under this part or assessed a civil penalty under this part.
( d ) *Cancellation.* The Federal land manager may cancel a permit when the permittee requests cancellation, or when resource, safety, or other administrative or management reasons make permit cancellation appropriate. Cancellation of a permit does not imply fault on the part of the permittee.
( e ) *Notification of modification, suspension, revocation, or cancellation.* ( 1 ) The Federal land manager will notify the permittee of the modification, suspension, revocation, or cancellation verbally or in writing. The Federal land manager will, as soon as practicable, confirm a verbal notification with a written notification. A written notification will be served on the permittee by certified mail, return receipt requested, or another verifiable delivery method, and will explain the reason for the modification, suspension, revocation, or cancellation.
( 2 ) In the case of a suspension, the written notification will also include the conditions or actions necessary for ending the suspension; the anticipated duration of the suspension or schedule for resolution of the conditions that led to the suspension; and a statement that the permit will be modified, revoked, or cancelled if the conditions that led to the suspension are not resolved.
( 3 ) The written notification will inform the permittee how to appeal the modification, revocation, suspension, or cancellation.
( f ) A modification, suspension, revocation, or cancellation is in full force and effective immediately upon the permittee's receipt of the written notification of the modification, suspension, revocation, or cancellation.
§ 49.540 What procedures govern the DCHD hearing process initiated by a request for hearing on the final assessment? ( a ) Upon receipt of a request for hearing under § 49.535(a)(2), DCHD will assign an administrative law judge to preside over the hearing process and issue a decision. DCHD will promptly notify the parties of the assignment. Thereafter, all pleadings, papers, and other documents in the hearing process must be filed directly with that judge, with copies served on the other party.
( b ) An attorney from the Office of the Solicitor, DOI, will represent the bureau. The attorney will enter his or her appearance on behalf of the bureau and file all motions and correspondence between the bureau and the person who filed the request for hearing. Subsequently, any service upon the bureau must be made to the attorney.
( c ) To the extent not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart, the rules in 43 CFR part 4, subparts A and B, and in 43 CFR 4.422 through 4.437 will apply to the hearing process under this subpart.
( d ) The hearing will be conducted in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 554. The bureau will have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence the fact of the violation and the basis for the amount of the civil penalty. Upon completion of the hearing and incorporation of the hearing transcript in the record, the administrative law judge will issue a written decision in accordance with § 49.545 and serve it on the parties.
**Exhibit ****31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, David Gladstone,certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/Aof Gladstone Capital Corporation;and

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.

 

Date: January 13,2009

 
| /s/  DAVID GLADSTONE |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|  David Gladstone     |   |
| Chief Executive Officer   |   |

 

----
§ 3481.4-4 What is the aggregate amount of time I can temporarily interrupt coal severance and have BLM consider my lease or LMU producing? ( a ) If you (the lessee/operator) want BLM to consider your lease or LMU to be producing, the aggregate of all temporary interruptions in coal severance from your lease or LMU must not exceed 1 year in the 5-consecutive-year period immediately preceding the date of BLM's determination of lessee qualifications under § 3472.1-2 of this chapter.
( b ) BLM will not count toward the aggregate interruption limit described in paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) Any interruption in coal severance that is 14 days or less in duration;
( 2 ) Any suspension granted under § 3483.3 of this part; and
( 3 ) Any BLM-approved suspension of the requirements of § 3472.1-2(e)(1) of this part for reasons of strikes, the elements, or casualties not attributable to the operator/lessee before diligent development is achieved.
[62 FR 44370, Aug. 20, 1997]
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Teaching with Historic Places





Contact Us
  Lesson Plans by State
 Find lesson plans based on themes in American history.
 State flag of Alabama, CC0 Alabama
State flag of Alaska, CC0Alaska
State flag of Arizona, CC0 Arizona
State flag of Arkansas, CC0Arkansas
State flag of California, CC0California
State flag of Colorado, CC0Colorado
State flag of Connecticut, CC0 Connecticut
State flag of Delaware, CC0Delaware
Flag of the District of Columbia, CC0District of Columbia
State flag of Florida, CC0 Florida
State flag of Georgia, CC0Georgia
State flag of Hawai'i, CC0Hawai'i
State flag of Idaho, CC0Idaho
State flag of Illinois, CC0Illinois
State flag of Indiana, CC0Indiana
State flag of Iowa, CC0Iowa
State flag of Kansas, CC0Kansas
State flag of Kentucky, CC0Kentucky
State flag of Louisiana, CC0Louisiana
State flag of Maine, CC0Maine
State flag of Maryland, CC0Maryland
State flag of Massachusetts, CC0Massachusetts
State flag of Michigan, CC0Michigan
State flag of Minnesota, CC0Minnesota
State flag of Mississippi, CC0 Mississippi
State flag of Missouri, CC0Missouri
State flag of Montana, CC0Montana
State flag of Nebraska, CC0Nebraska
State flag of Nevada, CC0Nevada
State flag of New Hampshire, CC0New Hampshire
State flag of New Jersey, CC0New Jersey
State flag of New Mexico, CC0New Mexico
State flag of New York, CC0New York
State flag of North Carolina, CC0North Carolina
State flag of North Dakota, CC0North Dakota
State flag of Ohio, CC0Ohio
State flag of Oklahoma, CC0Oklahoma
State flag of Oregon, CC0Oregon
State flag of Pennsylvania, CC0Pennsylvania
Flag of Puerto Rico, CC0 Puerto Rico
State flag of Rhode Island, CC0Rhode Island
State flag of South Carolina, CC0South Carolina
State flag of South Dakota, courtesy Wikipedia. South Dakota
State flag of Tennessee, CC0Tennessee
State flag of Texas, CC0Texas
Flag of U.S. Midway , CC0U.S. Minor Islands
State flag of Utah, CC0Utah
State flag of Vermont, CC0Vermont
State flag of Virginia, CC0Virginia
State flag of Washington, CC0Washington
State flag of West Virginia, CC0West Virginia
Stat flag of Wisconsin, CC0Wisconsin
State flag of Wyoming, CC0Wyoming
 Last updated: September 27, 2023
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
§ 44.22 Are there any special circumstances that affect the way the Department calculates PILT payments? If a local government eligible for payments under this subpart reorganizes, the Department will: ( a ) Calculate payments for the fiscal year in which the reorganization occurred as if the reorganization had not occurred; and
( b ) Disburse any payment due to each new unit based on the amount of eligible acreage in that unit.
EXHIBIT A

Case 1:20-cv-22202-KMM Document 51-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2020 Page 1 of 3
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS

I, Michael W. Slaunwhite, hereby certify that, as to the claims asserted under the federal 

securities laws, that:

1. I have reviewed the facts and allegations of the CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION 

COMPLAINT and authorize its filing.

2. I did not purchase the securities that are the subject of this action at the direction of my 

counsel or in order to participate in any action under the federal securities laws.

3. I am willing to serve as a representative party on behalf of the Class, including giving 

testimony at deposition and trial, if necessary. I understand that this is not a claim form, 

and that my ability to share in any recovery as a member of the Class is not dependent upon 

execution of this Certification.

4. My transactions in Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc securities that are the subject of 

this action are attached in Schedule A. I have complete authority to bring a suit to recover 

for investment losses for all securities set forth in Schedule A.

5. During the three years prior to the date of this Certification, I sought to serve as a 

representative party on behalf of a class in the following action under the federal securities 

laws:

Oregon Laborers Employers Pension Trust Fund v. Maxar Technologies Inc., et al.,

No. 1:19-cv-00124-WJM-SKC (D. Colo.)

6. I will not accept any payment for serving as a representative party on behalf of the Class 

beyond my pro rata share of any recovery, except such reasonable costs and expenses 

(including lost wages) directly relating to the representation of the Class, as ordered or 

approved by the Court.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on: 

Michael W. Slaunwhite

12/14/2020

Case 1:20-cv-22202-KMM Document 51-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2020 Page 2 of 3
Security Buy/Sell Date Quantity Price

Com Stk Buy 2/24/2020 5,000 $38.00

SCHEDULE A

Case 1:20-cv-22202-KMM Document 51-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2020 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                             EVERGREENBANCORP, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald
O. Hatler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Gerald O. Hatler
-----------------------
Gerald O. Hatler
Chief Executive Officer

March 18, 2004