alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### PART II—PENALTIES APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN TAXES

Sec.
7231.
Failure to obtain license for collection of foreign items.
7232.
Failure to register or reregister under section 4101, false representations of registration status, etc.
[7233 to 7241. Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11164(b)(4), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1976, inserted "or reregister" after "register" in item 7232.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title X, §1032(e)(12)(C), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 935, added item 7232 and struck out former item 7232 "Failure to register, or false statement by manufacturer or producer of gasoline, diesel fuel, or aviation fuel".

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §1704(t)(20)(B), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1888, struck out "lubricating oil," after "gasoline," in item 7232.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(c)(22)(D)(ii), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–528, struck out item 7240 "Officials investing or speculating in sugar".

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–647, title III, §3001(b)(3)(C), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3615, substituted ", lubricating oil, diesel fuel, or aviation fuel" for "or lubricating oil" in item 7232.

Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1941(b)(3)(F), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1324, struck out item 7241 "Willful failure to furnish certain information regarding windfall profit tax on domestic crude oil".

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–223, title I, §101(e)(2), Apr. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 252, added item 7241.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1904(b)(7)(B)(ii), (8)(D)(ii), (9)(B)(ii), (10)(F)(ii), 1952(n)(2)(B), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1815, 1816, 1818, 1846, struck out items 7233 "Failure to pay, or attempt to evade payment of, tax on cotton futures, and other violations", 7234 "Violation of laws relating to oleomargarine or adulterated butter operations", 7235 "Violation of laws relating to adulterated butter and process or renovated butter", 7239 "Violations of laws relating to white phosphorus matches", and 7241 "Penalty for fraudulent equalization tax certificates".

**1974**—Pub. L. 93–490, §3(b)(2), Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1467, struck out item 7236 "Violation of laws relating to filled cheese".

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–513, title III, §1101(b)(4)(B), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1292, struck out items 7237 "Violation of laws relating to narcotic drugs and to marihuana" and 7238 "Violation of laws relating to opium for smoking".

**1965**—Pub. L. 89–44, title VIII, §802(b)(6), June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 159, struck out "or give bond" after "Failure to register" in item 7232.

**1964**—Pub. L. 88–563, §6(c)(2), Sept. 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 847, inserted item 7241.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-21988-COOKE/GOODMAN

ANGELA SALAS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION,

Defendant.

___________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THIS MATTER comes before me on United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan 

Goodman’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on Defendant’s Motion Regarding 

Choice of Law for Punitive Damages, ECF No. 95. The underlying motion was referred to 

Judge Goodman on October 22, 2020. See ECF No. 68. In his Report, Judge Goodman 

recommends that the Court DENY Defendant’s motion. Neither party objected to Judge 

Goodman’s R&R and the time to do so has passed.

After reviewing the motion, Judge Goodman’s R&R, and the relevant legal 

authorities, the record, I find Judge Goodman’s R&R clear, cogent, and compelling. 

Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS and ADOPTS Judge Goodman’s R&R, ECF No. 

95, and DENIES Defendant’s Motion Regarding Choice of Law for Punitive Damages,

ECF No. 68. The Court also DENIES as moot Plaintiff’s request to amend the complaint.

See ECF No. 85.

Case 1:20-cv-21988-MGC Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2021 Page 1 of 2
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, at Miami, Florida, this 19

th day of May 2021.

Copies furnished to:

Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-21988-MGC Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2021 Page 2 of 2
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

The Four Ambassadors Master 

Association, Inc. and The Four 

Ambassadors Association, Inc., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

Seneca Insurance Company, Inc., 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-22047-Civ-Scola

Order Vacating Clerk’s Default

This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ motion to set aside (ECF 

No. 15) the clerk’s defaults entered on June 16, 2020 (ECF No. 10). 

The Defendants filed this motion to set aside the Clerk’s default on July 1, 

2020, arguing that the Defendants were not properly served until June 30, 2020. 

Therefore, the Defendant need not respond to the Complaint until July 20, 2020. 

On July 6, 2020, the Plaintiffs filed a notice stating that they do not oppose the 

Defendant’s motion to set aside the default. (ECF No. 16.) 

Finding good cause to set aside the default, the Court grants the 

Defendant’s motion (ECF No. 15) and directs the Clerk to vacate the default 

(ECF No. 10). The Court also denies the Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment 

(ECF No. 13).

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, on July 7, 2020.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-22047-RNS Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case Number: 20-21813-CIV-MARTINEZ-OTAZO-REYES

MARLENA ROSADO, on behalf of herself 

and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v. 

BARRY UNIVERSITY, INC,

Defendant. 

______________________________________/ 

FINAL JUDGMENT

This action having settled pursuant to the Class Settlement Agreement and Release 

(“Settlement Agreement”) [ECF No. 78-1], and the Court having entered an Order Granting Final 

Approval of Class Action Settlement, Denying Approval of Service Award, and Granting 

Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Final Approval Order”) [ECF No. 84], it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 

1. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54 and 58, Final Judgment is ENTERED, 

and Plaintiff’s claims are released, as set forth in the Final Approval Order and 

Settlement Agreement. 

2. All Releasing Parties1 in this action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, without 

fees and costs to any party except as otherwise provided in the Final Approval Order. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 10th day of September, 

2021. 

 __________________________________ 

 JOSE E. MARTINEZ

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to: 

Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes

All Counsel of Record

1 Capitalized terms in this Final Judgment, unless otherwise indicated, shall have the meaning 

attributed to them in the Settlement Agreement. 

Case 1:20-cv-21813-JEM Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2021 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE No.: 1:20-cv-21887-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff, 

v.

DANIEL FINGERGUT, ET AL.,

Defendants.

AICEL CARBONERO

Relief Defendant.

________________________________________/

ORDER 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Receiver’s Fourth Interim Application for 

an Order Approving and Authorizing Payment of Fees and Expenses of Receiver and Her

Professionals (the “Application”) [ECF No. 275]. The Court, having reviewed the Application, 

noting that the fees and costs requested therein are reasonable, necessary and commensurate with 

the skills and experience required for the activities performed and described therein, and that no 

objection to the Application has been filed, and otherwise being fully advised in the matter, finds 

good cause to approve the Application and grant the relief requested therein.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Receiver’s Fourth Interim Application for an Order Approving and

Authorizing Payment of Fees and Expenses of Receiver and Her Professionals, [ECF No. 

275], is APPROVED.

Case 1:20-cv-21887-DPG Document 282 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2021 Page 1 of 2
2. The total amount of fees and costs that the Receiver1 and her Lead Counsel, 

Damian & Valori LLP, incurred regarding work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties 

during the Application Period in the amount of $92,629.07 is hereby APPROVED.

3. The Receiver is AUTHORIZED to pay the Receiver and her Lead Counsel, 

Damian & Valori LLP, the amount of $92,629.07 (which total includes $79,508.00 in fees 

and $13,121.07 in costs) for work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties.

4. The total amount of fees and costs that the Forensic Accountants, Kapila 

Mukamal, LLP, incurred regarding work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties during 

the Application Period in the amount of $5,718.26 is hereby APPROVED. 

5. The Receiver is AUTHORIZED to pay to her Forensic Accountants, 

Kapila Mukamal, LLP, the amount of $5,718.26 (which total includes $5,684.00 in fees 

and $34.26 in costs) for work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties.

6. The Court reserves final approval of all fees approved herein until such time 

as the Receiver is discharged of her duties in this matter and/or final disbursement of funds 

held by the Estate. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 17th day of November,

2021.

_______________________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Copies to: All Counsel of Record

1 Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same ascribed meaning as in the Application. 

Case 1:20-cv-21887-DPG Document 282 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2021 Page 2 of 2
### §6406. Prohibition of administrative review of decisions

In the absence of fraud or mistake in mathematical calculation, the findings of fact in and the decision of the Secretary upon the merits of any claim presented under or authorized by the internal revenue laws and the allowance or non-allowance by the Secretary of interest on any credit or refund under the internal revenue laws shall not, except as provided in subchapters C and D of chapter 76 (relating to the Tax Court), be subject to review by any other administrative or accounting officer, employee, or agent of the United States.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 792; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.
#### § 3425.1-9 Modification of application area.

The authorized officer may add or delete lands from an area covered by an application for any reason he/she determines to be in the public interest. If an environmental assessment of the modification is required, BLM will solicit and consider public comments on the modified application.

[47 FR 33141, July 30, 1982, as amended at 64 FR 52243, Sept. 28, 1999]
#### Ruth F. Heckel et al., and Peter L. Heckel, Respondents, v. City of New York, Appellant.

On call of the calendar and on consent of the parties, the order for defendant’s examination before trial is modified in accordance with the signed stipulation of the parties, wherein defendant states that it has no one in its employ who has personal knowledge with respect to items 1, 2, 3 and 4 of said order, that it will produce no employee on the trial to testify to matters referred to in such items, and that it will promptly arrange with plaintiff for the immediate examination of any employee who has knowledge of such matters, in the event future investigation discloses the existence of such employee. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFree vibration of hexagonal panels supported at discrete pointsAn analytical study to determine the structural dynamic behavior of a hexagonal panel with discrete simple supports is presented. These panels are representative of the facets of a precision reflector surface. The effects of both support point location and panel curvature on the lowest natural frequency of the panel are quantified and discussed.Document ID19910009853Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWu, K. Chauncey*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1991Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102688NASA-TM-102688Accession Number91N19166Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-43-41-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009853.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Louisa Fribourg v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank.

Motion granted unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
# Output TABLE

Schedule B-5 Page &P of &N
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Commerce Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter
M. Psztur, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Walter M. Psztur
---------------------------
Walter M. Psztur
Chief Financial Officer
December 15, 2003
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2013

p0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2013

146556

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146556

COA: 307134

Jackson CC: 11-004231-FH

SEAN CLARK,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### §4212. Training and technical assistance

There are authorized to be appropriated for assistance for a national organization representing Native American housing interests for providing training and technical assistance to Indian housing authorities and tribally designated housing entities such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2013.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title VII, §703, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4051; Pub. L. 107–292, §2(c), Nov. 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 2053; Pub. L. 110–411, title VII, §701(c), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4334.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–411 substituted "2009 through 2013" for "1997 through 2007".

2002—Pub. L. 107–292 substituted "1997 through 2007" for "1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 26, 1996, see section 705 of Pub. L. 104–330, set out as a note under section 4211 of this title.
### §983c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–484, §5, Oct. 31, 1990, 104 Stat. 1168; Pub. L. 104–109, §12, Feb. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 765, which related to eligibility of the tribe and its members for Federal services and benefits, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 (the Form
10-K/A), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K/A
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 29, 2015



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MELISSA MORRISON   
|Melissa Morrison       
|Chief Financial Officer
# Europos Sąjungos C 232A/2005

| | ISSN 1725-521X |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 232A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir prane_imai | 48 tomas2005m. rugsėjo 21d. |

ISSN 1725-521X

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 232A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir prane_imai

48 tomas2005m. rugsėjo 21d.

---

| Prane_imo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Pranešimas |
| | Europos Komisija |
| 2005/C 232A/1 | Bendrijos žuvininkystės kontrolės agentūros vykdančiojo direktoriaus (A*14 kategorija) pareigoms užimti — KOM/2005/10004 | 1 |

Prane_imo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

III   Pranešimas

Europos Komisija

2005/C 232A/1

Bendrijos žuvininkystės kontrolės agentūros vykdančiojo direktoriaus (A*14 kategorija) pareigoms užimti — KOM/2005/10004

1

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

III Pranešimas

Europos Komisija

| 21.9.2005 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2005

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 232/1

---

PRANEŠIMAS APIE KONKURSĄ

BENDRIJOS ŽUVININKYSTĖS KONTROLĖS AGENTŪROS VYKDANČIOJO DIREKTORIAUS (A*14 KATEGORIJA) PAREIGOMS UŽIMTI

KOM/2005/10004

(2005/C 232 A/01)

Bendrijos žuvininkystės kontrolės agentūra skelbia konkursą direktoriaus pareigoms užimti.

Kandidatai privalo turėti vienos iš Europos Sąjungos valstybių narių pilietybę.

Direktorių paskiria agentūros administracinė valdyba iš Europos Komisijos atrinktų ir siūlomų kandidatų sąrašo. Pagal Kitų Europos Bendrijų tarnautojų įdarbinimo sąlygų 2a straipsnį jis (ji) bus paskirtas (-a) laikinu A*14 kategorijos tarnautoju penkerių metų laikotarpiui, kuris vieną kartą gali būti pratęstas iki penkerių metų. Agentūra ir Komisija vykdo lygių galimybių politiką.

Pareiginę instrukciją, paraiškos formą ir paraiškos pateikimo taisykles galima rasti internete šiais adresais:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

arba

http://europa.eu.int/comm/fisheries

Galutinė paraiškų priėmimo data yra 2005 m. spalio 21 d. (pašto ženklas laikomas išsiuntimo datos įrodymu).

---
#### § 3278.11 When I submit confidential, proprietary information, how can I help ensure it is not available to the public?

When you submit data and information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under part 2 of this title, you must clearly mark each page that you believe contains confidential information. BLM will keep all data and information confidential to the extent allowed by § 2.13(c) of this title.
### §488. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 488 was editorially reclassified as section 5136 of this title.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

Case No.: 1-20-cv-22051-DPG 

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 

3G LICENSING S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A. 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HMD AMERICA, INC. and HMD 

GLOBAL OY, 

 Defendants. 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION REQUESTING CLARIFICATION ON PAGE LIMITS FOR 

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING 

Case 1:20-cv-22051-DPG Document 54 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/08/2021 Page 1 of 3
Plaintiffs Sisvel International S.A., 3G Licensing S.A., and Sisvel S.p.A. (“Sisvel”) and 

Defendants HMD America, Inc. and HMD Global Oy (“HMD”) submitted Opening Claim 

Construction Briefs on March 1, 2021 pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order dated November 

18, 2020 (D.I. 35) and the Court’s Order dated February 25, 2021, (D.I. 46). Sisvel hereby requests 

the Court’s clarification regarding the applicable page limits. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1 (c)(2), Sisvel submitted an opening brief of 20 pages in length. 

(D.I. 47.) HMD submitted an opening brief between 32 and 33 pages in length. (D.I. 48.) Sisvel 

was not aware that HMD would be filing a brief longer than 20 pages until accessing HMD’s filed 

brief. When asked for clarification, HMD asserted that Local Rule 7.1 (c)(2) does not apply to 

claim construction briefing. 

Sisvel respectfully requests that the Court clarify whether the pages limits in Local Rule 

7.1 (c)(2) apply to the parties claim construction briefing in this case. Pursuant to the Court’s 

February 25, 2021 Order (D.I. 46), the parties are due to exchange responsive claim construction 

briefs on March 22, 2021 and reply claim construction briefs on April 5, 2021. 

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH CONFERENCE 

The undersigned certifies that in accordance with Local Rule 7.1(a)(3) of the Southern 

District of Florida, the undersigned has conferred with Defendant’s counsel, who, after initially 

representing that Defendant would not oppose the relief requested has, upon reviewing the motion 

indicated that “it does not consent to the motion as it is unnecessary but will not oppose the relief 

requested.” 

Dated: March 8, 2021 /s/ Jorge Espinosa 

Jorge Espinosa, Esq. 

Florida Bar No: 779032 

jorge.espinosa@gray-robinson.com 

Francesca Russo, Esq. 

francesca.russo@gray-robinson.com 

Robert R. Jimenez, Esq. 

robert.jimenez@gray-robinson.com 

GRAY | ROBINSON, P.A. 

Case 1:20-cv-22051-DPG Document 54 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/08/2021 Page 2 of 3
2

333 S.E. 2nd Ave., Suite 300 

Miami, FL 33131 

Tel: 305-416-6880 

Fax: 305-416-6887 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 

3G Licensing, S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A

Case 1:20-cv-22051-DPG Document 54 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/08/2021 Page 3 of 3
### Subpart C—Wines

Sec.
5041.
Imposition and rate of tax.
5042.
Exemption from tax.
5043.
Collection of taxes on wines.
5044.
Refund of tax on wine.
5045.
Cross references.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subpart C, comprising sections 5041 to 5045, related to wines, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

#### Amendments

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title XIV, §1416(b)(3), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1048, struck out "unmerchantable" before "wine" in item 5044.