alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.(a)**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**
     In connection with the Annual Report of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald R. Kimble, President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                      /s/ Donald R. Kimble   Donald R. Kimble   (chief executive officer)   March 25, 2005   
59
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Chancellor Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Maxwell Grant,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.





/s/ Maxwell GrantMaxwell
      GrantChief
      Executive Officerand
      Principal Financial Officer





August 10,
2009
### §7461. Publicity of proceedings

#### (a) General rule

Except as provided in subsection (b), all reports of the Tax Court and all evidence received by the Tax Court and its divisions, including a transcript of the stenographic report of the hearings, shall be public records open to the inspection of the public.

#### (b) Exceptions

#### (1) Trade secrets or other confidential information

The Tax Court may make any provision which is necessary to prevent the disclosure of trade secrets or other confidential information, including a provision that any document or information be placed under seal to be opened only as directed by the court.

#### (2) Evidence, etc.

After the decision of the Tax Court in any proceeding has become final, the Tax Court may, upon motion of the taxpayer or the Secretary, permit the withdrawal by the party entitled thereto of originals of books, documents, and records, and of models, diagrams, and other exhibits, introduced in evidence before the Tax Court or any division; or the Tax Court may, on its own motion, make such other disposition thereof as it deems advisable.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 887; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §465(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 825.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–369, in amending section generally, designated existing provisions as subsecs. (a) and (b)(2), added subsec. (b)(1), and in subsec. (b)(2), as so designated, struck out reference to the Secretary's delegate.

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §465(b), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 825, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [July 18, 1984]."
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40367 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. FERNANDO CASTANEDA-PEREZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-1027-1 Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Fernando Castaneda-Perez raises arguments that areforeclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan. 7, 2008) (No. 07- United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 30, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40367

2 6202). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.