alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Chancellor Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan M. Wright,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Alan WrightAlan
                M. Wright
              Chief
                Financial Officer




May
      15,
      2007
#### Kevin L. GLASS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. S.K. YOUNG, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-7609.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 2006.

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Kevin L. Glass, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Kevin L. Glass, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Glass has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### Anthony Martinese, Appellant, v. Port Trading Corp., Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint in an actio” brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment and order of the County Court, Albany County, and judgment of the City Court of Albany, reversed, on the law and facts, and plaintiff granted judgment in accordance with the prayer of the complaint, with costs in all courts. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 473 

To amend the CARES Act to extend the sunset for the definition of a 

small business debtor, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2021 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the CARES Act to extend the sunset for the 

definition of a small business debtor, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Bank5 ruptcy Relief Extension Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSIONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1113 of the CARES Act 

8 (Public Law 116–136) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)(5) (11 U.S.C. 1182 note), 

10 by striking ‘‘1 year’’ and inserting ‘‘2 years’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 473 IS

1 (2) in subsection (b)(2)(B) (11 U.S.C. 101 

2 note), by striking ‘‘1 year’’ and inserting ‘‘2 years’’. 

3 (b) MODIFICATION OF PLAN AFTER CONFIRMA4 TION.— 

5 (1) Section 1329(d)(1) of title 11, United 

6 States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding 

7 subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘this subsection’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘the COVID–19 Bankruptcy Relief Exten9 sion Act of 2021’’. 

10 (2) Section 1113(b)(1)(D)(ii) of the CARES 

11 Act (11 U.S.C. 1329 note) is amended by striking 

12 ‘‘this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘the COVID–19 Bank13 ruptcy Relief Extension Act of 2021’’. 

14 (c) BANKRUPTCY RELIEF.—Section 1001 of division 

15 FF of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public 

16 Law 116–260) is amended by striking ‘‘the date that is 

17 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act’’ each place 

18 the term appears and inserting ‘‘March 27, 2022’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


Certifications
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,
      Adam
      Mauerberger, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
      Treasurer of Atlantic Wine Agencies, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




(1)
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2007
      (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
      July 12, 2007




/s/ Adam
              MauerbergerAdam
              Mauerberger




President,
      Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
### PART III—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec.
5311.
Detention of containers.
5312.
Production and use of distilled spirits for experimental research.
5313.
Withdrawal of distilled spirits from customs custody free of tax for use of the United States.
5314.
Special applicability of certain provisions.
[5315.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1905(b)(4), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1822, struck out item 5315 "Status of certain distilled spirits on July 1, 1959".
Plant Protection 

and Quarantine

Find Your

Future With Us

United States Department of Agriculture

n Paid work experience for students with 

possible conversion without competition to 

a permanent position when they finish their 

education, training, and work requirements

n Leadership programs for career 

development and advancement

n Paid continuing education programs

n Scholarships, mentoring, 

shadowing assignments, 

and summer employment

n Networking opportunities

n Recognition incentives, 

challenges, and rewards

n Special hiring programs for interns, 

recent graduates, advanced degree 

candidates, and veterans

n Opportunities to innovate and improve 

program and organizational processes

n A supportive and collegial work environment

n Domestic and international travel

n Competitive starting pay with regular increases

n Comprehensive and affordable medical 

benefits and paid medical leave

n Affordable life insurance

n Comprehensive retirement benefits and 

pension plan

n Family-friendly work and leave policies

n 10 paid Federal holidays and paid vacation leave

n Health, wellness, and fitness programs

n Student Loan Repayment Program

We Offer:

Explore current opportunities at

www.usajobs.gov (search “APHIS”)

www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health

Issued April 2020 

Program Aid No. 2262

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

I want to help 

feed the 

world!
n Botanists, geneticists, 

entomologists, plant 

pathologists, and 

agriculturalists

n Plant health officers, 

technicians, and 

safeguarding 

specialists

n Computer scientists, 

global trade analysts, 

industrial engineers, 

statisticians, 

quantitative 

ecologists, and 

biometricians 

n Data analysts, 

economists, and 

trade directors

n Management, 

program, and 

budget analysts

n Administrative 

professionals of 

all types

Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ)

is a vital program of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Our mission is to 

safeguard American agriculture against invasive pests and facilitate the safe 

trade of agricultural products.

We Hire:

International trade in agricultural products 

feeds the world and supports more than 

1 million American jobs. While U.S. farmers 

and consumers have much to gain from 

global trade, it leaves our agricultural and 

natural resources vulnerable to the foreign 

plant pests and animal diseases that can 

move through commerce. These threats 

could greatly damage our farm 

economy, impact our food supply, 

decimate our natural resources, 

and cost billions of dollars 

to control or eradicate.

PPQ forms America’s first line of defense 

against the introduction and spread of 

invasive pests. Our nearly 3,000 employees 

bring their unique talents and best 

selves to this mission. From botanists to 

virologists, analysts to accountants, we 

hire problem solvers and innovators and 

empower them to manage risk, make 

 decisions, and safeguard agriculture 

 and the environment.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 13, 2018

No. 04-17-00438-CR

Arthur WHITLEY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR8583

The Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is GRANTED. The 

reply brief is due on April 19, 2018.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of April, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration Region II Advisory Council located in the geographical area of Buffalo, New York, will hold a public meeting at 10 a.m. eastern time on Wednesday, October 20, 2004, at the Buffalo Club, 388 Delaware Avenue, Buffalo, New York, to discuss such matters that may be presented by members, and staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present. Anyone wishing to make an oral presentation to the Board must contact Franklin J. Sciortino, District Director, in writing by letter or fax no later than Friday, October 15, 2004, in order to be put on the agenda. Franklin J. Sciortino, District Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, 1311 Federal Building, 111 West Hurton Street, Buffalo, NY 14202. Telephone (716) 551-4301 or Fax (716) 551-4418. 

Matthew K. Becker, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 04-22201 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the annual report of microHelix, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James E. Horswill,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:


1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.


Date:
      May 11, 2007








/ s/
      James E. Horswill


James
      E.
      Horswill


Chief
      Financial Officer
### §33. Tax withheld at source on nonresident aliens and foreign corporations

There shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle the amount of tax withheld at source under subchapter A of chapter 3 (relating to withholding of tax on nonresident aliens and on foreign corporations).

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 13, §32; renumbered §33 and amended Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §§471(c), 474(j), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 826, 832.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 33 was renumbered section 27 of this title.

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–369, §471(c), renumbered section 32 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 98–369, §474(j), amended section generally, striking out "and on tax-free covenant bonds" after "foreign corporations" in section catchline, and, in text, substituting "as a credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle" for "as credits against the tax imposed by this chapter", and striking out designation "(1)" before "the amount of tax withheld", and ", and (2) the amount of tax withheld at source under subchapter B of chapter 3 (relating to interest on tax-free covenant bonds)" after "on foreign corporations)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §475(b), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 847, provided that: "The amendments made by subsections (j) and (r)(29) [amending this section and sections 12, 164, 1441, 1442, 6049, and 7701 of this title and repealing section 1451 of this title] shall not apply with respect to obligations issued before January 1, 1984."
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date : April 14, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Stanley Weiner                   |   |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Name Stanley Weiner                                                                                                            |   |
|                  |   | Title Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                  |   |
|                  |   |                                                                                                                                |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |
| Date:      April 15, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Gary      Rasmussen                           |   |
|                      |   | Name Gary      Rasmussen                                                                                                                                                            |   |
|                      |   | Title Chief      Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                  |   |
|                      |   |                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |
§ 4.450-4 Complaints. ( a ) *Contents of complaint.* The complaint shall contain the following information, under oath: ( 1 ) The name and address of each party interested;
( 2 ) A legal description of the land involved;
( 3 ) A reference, so far as known to the contestant, to any proceedings pending for the acquisition of title to, or an interest, in such land:
( 4 ) A statement in clear and concise language of the facts constituting the grounds of contest;
( 5 ) A statement of the law under which contestant claims or intends to acquire title to, or an interest in, the land and of the facts showing that he is qualified to do so;
( 6 ) A statement that the proceeding is not collusive or speculative but is insitituted and will be diligently pursued in good faith;
( 7 ) A request that the contestant be allowed to prove his allegations and that the adverse interest be invalidated;
( 8 ) The office in which the complaint is filed and the address to which documents shall be sent for service on the contestant; and
( 9 ) A notice that unless the contestee files an answer to the complaint in such office within 30 days after service of the notice, the allegations of the complaint will be taken as confessed.
( b ) *Amendment of complaint.* Except insofar as the manager, administrative law judge, Director, Board or Secretary may raise issues in connection with deciding a contest, issues not raised in a complaint may not be raised later by the contestant unless the administrative law judge permits the complaint to be amended after due notice to the other parties and an opportunity to object.
( c ) *Corroboration required.* All allegations of fact in the complaint which are not matters of official record or capable of being judicially noticed and which, if proved, would invalidate the adverse interest must be corroborated under oath by the statement of witnesses. Each such allegation of fact must be corroborated by the statement of at least one witness having personal knowledge of the alleged fact and such fact must be set forth in the statement. All statements by witnesses shall be attached to the complaint.
( d ) *Filing fee.* Each complaint must be accompanied by a filing fee of $10 and a deposit of $20 toward reporter's fees. Any complaint which is not accompanied by the required fee and deposit will not be accepted for filing.
( e ) *Waiver of issues.* Any issue not raised by a private contestant in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section, which was known to him, or could have been known to him by the exercise of reasonable diligence, shall be deemed to have been waived by him, and he shall thereafter be forever barred from raising such issue.
[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 88 FR 5794, Jan. 30, 2023]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 24, 2011 

y1017 

Order 

 

October 24, 2011 

143430 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143430 

 COA: 303946 

Alpena CC: 10-003581-FH 

ALLAN STEPHAN KOTT, 10-003582-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Paschal *v.*The State.

February 14, 1911.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Meadow. Lincoln superior court. December 8, 1910.

*J. B. Burnside,*for plaintiff in error. *E. A. Eallf attorney-general,*and *T. J. Brown, solicitor-general,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

Some portions of the charge were not entirely free from criticism. Among other things; the judge read certain sections of the Penal Code to the jury, and later on in his charge referred to the sections by numbers, which was not an apt method of bringing their attention to the subject-matter contained in such sections. Again, he gave in charge sections 70, 71, and 73 of the Penal Code, instructed' the jury that the doctrine of reasonable fears applied both to the defense provided by section 70 and to that provided by section 73, and that they should keep the distinction in these two principles of law separate in their minds, as such sections had been delivered' to them, so that they might apply either or both to the facts of the case, but did not explain' to them what the difference was. Nevertheless, in view of Jbhe evidence, which made a clear case of murder, of the fact that section 73 was given at the request of counsel for the accused, and of the entire charge, none of the assignments of error present any such error as requires the grant of a new trial. *'Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*