525307.1 

David R.E. Aladjem 

daladjem@downeybrand.com 

June 4, 2003 

VIA FACSIMILE

Michael J. Ryan 

Area Manager 

U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation 

16349 Shasta Dam Blvd. 

Shasta Lake, CA 96019 

Re: Sutter Mutual Water Company -- Renewal Contract 

Dear Mike: 

During the last negotiating session on the renewal contract for Sutter Mutual Water Company 

(the “Company”), the Company agreed to provide the United States Bureau of Reclamation 

(“Reclamation”) with two documents: (i) a counter-proposal to Reclamation’s offer to renew the 

Company’s settlement contract at a contract quantity of 220,000 afy and (ii) a response to 

Reclamation’s document entitled “Technical Analysis of Sutter Mutual Water Company's Water 

Needs.” The Company will provide its written comments of the final Water Needs Analysis to 

Reclamation during this Friday’s negotiating session. 

The Company proposes that its water rights settlement contract be renewed on the following key 

terms. First, the total contract quantity would be 238,000 afy. Attached for your review is a 

memorandum prepared by MBK Engineers that explains the Company’s rationale for this 

contract quantity. In brief, the Company believes that this contract quantity is supported by: (i) 

actual diversion data, with minor adjustments for changes in rice acreage; (ii) the results of a 

spreadsheet that has shown the ability to model the Company’s actual diversions over the past 12 

years; and (iii) the analysis in the Basin-Wide Management Plan, which Reclamation agreed 

should serve as the technical basis for these negotiations. 

Second, the Company proposes that Project Water compose 25% of its total contract quantity. 

This percentage is greater than the percentage of Project Water in any of the contracts for the 

other major Sacramento River Settlement Contractors that have water rights of approximately the 

same priority as those of the Company. 

Third, as a consequence of the initial two points, the Company is prepared to turn back to 

Reclamation approximately 35,000 af of Project Water. In exchange for such a substantial 

reduction in its contract quantity and as partial compensation for Reclamation’s view that the 
Michael J. Ryan 

June 4, 2003 

Page 2 

525307.1 

Company bear the risk of increased salinity, the Company seeks an additional 5,625 afy of Base 

Supply and proposes to move a total of 23,025 afy of this augmented quantity of Base Supply 

into July, August and September. The increase and reallocation of Base Supply is necessary in 

order to bring the Company’s percentage of Project Water into line with the percentage of other 

Sacramento River Settlement Contractors and in order to meet demonstrated water demands 

during July, August and September. 

In summary, this proposal is intended by the Company as a good-faith effort to bridge the gap 

between Reclamation’s last proposal of 220,000 afy and the Company’s last proposal of 247,900 

afy, recognizing the technical information provided by MBK Engineers and the Company’s 

senior water rights. 

The Company looks forward to discussing this proposal with you at the negotiating session on 

June 6. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. 

Very truly yours, 

David R.E. Aladjem 

cc: Max Sakato