alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   206051
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                498112
<PP&E>                                         4232436
<DEPRECIATION>                                  700391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5109922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         15469959
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                         14659
<OTHER-SE>                                  (11510411)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5109922
<SALES>                                         582337<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                582337
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   966680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4206734
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              545488
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (4591077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (4547228)<F2>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (4547228)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
<FN>
<F1>Jukebox lease revenues
<F2>Includes net income of $43,849 from jointly controlled company
</FN>


</TABLE>
### §5562. Exemptions from certain requirements in cases of disaster

Whenever the Secretary finds that it is necessary or desirable, by reason of disaster, to waive provisions of internal revenue law with regard to distilled spirits, he may temporarily exempt proprietors of distilled spirits plants from any provision of the internal revenue laws relating to distilled spirits, except those requiring payment of the tax thereon, to the extent he may deem necessary or desirable.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1397; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior section 5215, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 640, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
Exhibit 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


  /s/ Mark J. Cowan
Mark J. Cowan
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
November 10, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          32,828
<SECURITIES>                                     4,474
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                       400
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,636
<PP&E>                                           2,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,012
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,524
<SALES>                                          7,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,461
<CGS>                                              585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,624
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (101)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        26
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (127)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (127)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
3(i).8
 
 
    
     Section 1. Designation and Amount .




---



##### 



Section 2. Dividends and Distributions .
  provided however
   2




---



##### 



Section 3. Voting Rights .
     pari passu
  3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



Section 4. Certain Restrictions .
       Section 5. Reacquired Shares .
   5




---



##### 



Section 6. Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up .
     6




---



##### 



Section 7. Consolidation, Merger, etc .
  Section 8. No Redemption .
  Section 9. Ranking.
  Section 10. Amendment .
  Section 11. Fractional Shares .
   7




---



##### 



EASYLINK SERVICES INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Thomas J. StallingsName:
    Thomas J. StallingsTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer (Corporate Seal)Attest:/s/ Glen E. Shipley

Glen E. Shipley
  8
#### § 4.840 Offer of proof.

An offer of proof made in connection with an objection taken to any ruling of the administrative law judge excluding proffered oral testimony shall consist of a statement of the substance of the evidence which counsel contends would be adduced by such testimony. If the excluded evidence consists of evidence in written form or consists of reference to documents, a copy of such evidence shall be marked for identification and shall accompany the record as the offer of proof.
§ 3212.15 Will my lease remain in effect if I cease production and I do not have an approved suspension? In the absence of a suspension issued under § 3212.11, if you cease production for more than one calendar month on a lease that is subject to royalties and that has achieved commercial production (through actual or allocated production), your lease will remain in effect only if the circumstances described in paragraphs (a), (b), or (c) of this section apply: ( a ) ( 1 ) For leases issued on or after August 8, 2005 (other than leases issued in response to applications pending on that date for which no election is made under § 3200.8(b)(1)), and for leases issued before August 8, 2005, for which an election is made under § 3200.7(a)(2), your lease will remain in effect if, during the period in which there is no production, you continue to pay a monthly advanced royalty under MMS regulations at 30 CFR 218.305. This option is available only for an aggregate of 10 years (120 months, whether consecutive or not).
( 2 ) For leases issued before August 8, 2005, for which no election is made under § 3200.7(a)(2), and for leases issued in response to applications pending on August 8, 2005, for which no election is made under § 3200.8(b)(1), your lease will remain in effect if, during the period in which there is no production you: ( i ) Continue to make minimum royalty payments as specified in § 3211.21(b) of this part;
( ii ) Maintain a well capable of production in commercial quantities;
( iii ) Continue to make diligent efforts to utilize the geothermal resource; and
( iv ) Satisfy any other applicable requirements.
( b ) The Secretary: ( 1 ) Requires or causes the cessation of production; or
( 2 ) Determines that the cessation in production is required or otherwise caused by: ( i ) The Secretary of the Air Force, Army, or Navy;
( ii ) A state or a political subdivision of a state; or
( iii ) Force majeure.
( c ) The discontinuance of production is caused by the performance of maintenance necessary to maintain operations. Such maintenance is considered a production activity, not a cessation of production, and maintenance may include activities such as overhauling your power plant, re-drilling or re-working wells that are critical to plant operation, or repairing and improving gathering systems or transmission lines, that necessitate the discontinuation of production. You must obtain BLM approval by submitting a Geothermal Sundry Notice if the activity will require more than one calendar month, for it to be classified as maintenance under this paragraph. The BLM must receive the Geothermal Sundry Notice before the end of the first calendar month in which there will be no production.
# OUTPUT

Schedule A-2APage &P of &N

Schedule A-2APage &P of &N

# Footnotes

Schedule A-2APage &P of &N

Schedule A-2APage &P of &N
§ 3809.591 What are the limitations on the amount by which BLM may reduce my financial guarantee? ( a ) This section applies to your financial guarantee, but not to any funding mechanism established under § 3809.552(c) to pay for long-term treatment of effluent or site maintenance. Calculation of bond percentages in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section does not include any funds held in that kind of funding mechanism.
( b ) BLM may release up to 60 percent of your financial guarantee for a portion of your project area when BLM determines that you have successfully completed backfilling; regrading; establishment of drainage control; and stabilization and detoxification of leaching solutions, heaps, tailings, and similar facilities on that portion of the project area.
( c ) BLM may release the remainder of your financial guarantee for the same portion of the project area when— ( 1 ) BLM determines that you have successfully completed reclamation, including revegetating the area disturbed by operations; and
( 2 ) Any effluent discharged from the area has met applicable effluent limitations and water quality standards for one year without needing additional treatment, or you have established a funding mechanism under § 3809.552(c) to pay for long-term treatment, and any effluent discharged from the area has met applicable effluent limitations and water quality standards water for one year with or without treatment.
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–70 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1185, FEDERAL 

DEPOSIT INSURANCE REFORM ACT OF 2005 

MAY 3, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 255] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 255, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1185, the 

Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005, under an open rule. 

The rule provides one hour of general debate, equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Financial Services. The rule waives all points of 

order against consideration of the bill. 

The rule provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now 

printed in the bill shall be considered as an original bill for the 

purpose of amendment. The rule further provides that the bill shall 

be considered for amendment by section and that each section shall 

be considered as read. 

The rule authorizes the Chair to accord priority in recognition to 

Members who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional Record. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The Congressional Budget Office has identified H.R. 1185 as containing a private-sector mandate as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, the cost of which is expected to exceed the annual threshold established by UMRA ($123 in 2005, adjusted annuVerDate Aug 04 2004 04:32 May 04, 2005 Jkt 039008 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR070.109 HR070
2 

ally for inflation). The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill includes a waiver of this provision. 

Æ
(No. 824

Claimant awarded $159.27.)

#### Chicago-Springfield Coal Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 9, 1926.*

War *tax*— when *refund may be made.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court in *.Clark Coal*& *Coke Co.*v. *State, supra.*

Stevens & Herndon, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

The facts disclosed in. this claim are similar to the case of Clark, Coal and Coke Company, No. 821-41, in which it appeared that no claim was made for war tax on shipments of coal to institutions under the control of defendants. Representatives of defendant were advised that no war tax would *236be required on freight charges on the shipments of coal made to State institutions. However after the transaction was closed, the federal authorities collected this tax from claimant and for reasons set forth in the Clark case it is the opinion of this court that claimant is entitled to recover the amount of the tax.

Therefore it is ordered by the court that claimant be allowed the sum of $159.27.
§ 422.1 Purpose of this part. ( a ) This part implements Public Law No. 107-69, 115 Stat. 593 (November 12, 2001), an Act to Amend the Reclamation Recreation Management Act of 1992, by: ( 1 ) Establishing eligibility criteria, such as fitness and training requirements, for Federal, State, local, and tribal law enforcement personnel to protect Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) facilities and lands; and
( 2 ) Ensuring that Federal, State, local, and tribal law enforcement programs comply with applicable laws and regulations when they discharge the Secretary of the Interior's authority.
( b ) This part does not apply to, or limit or restrict in any way, the investigative jurisdiction or exercise of law enforcement authority of any Federal law enforcement agency, under Federal law, within a Reclamation project or on Reclamation lands. The provisions of this part apply to non-Department of the Interior Federal law enforcement agents only where Reclamation has entered into a cooperative agreement or contract with a Federal law enforcement agency, pursuant to Public Law 107-69, for the services of specified individual Federal law enforcement agents.
( c ) Nothing in this part shall be construed or applied to affect any existing right of a State or local government, or an Indian tribe, or their law enforcement officers, to exercise concurrent civil and criminal jurisdiction within a Reclamation project or on Reclamation lands.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59267-59268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 24, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Cable Television 
Laboratories, Inc. (``CableLabs'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notification

[[Page 59268]]

were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.Specifically, Massillon Cable TV, Inc., Massillon, OH; 
and Community Rebroadcasting Service Association (CRRS TV), Labrador 
City, Newfoundland, CANADA have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CableLabs intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On August 8, 1988, CableLabs filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on September 7, 1988 (53 FR 34593).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 21, 
2004. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on July 23, 2004 (69 FR 44062).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-22164 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Order entered November 2, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01015-CV

IN RE GENE E. PHILLIPS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-05268-A

ORDER

On September 17, 2018, relator filed a “Notice of Pending Settlement” and informed the 

Court that relator anticipated he would file a motion to dismiss this proceeding after the 

settlement documents are executed. To date, the Court has received no further correspondence 

or filings from relator. We ORDER relator to file either a report on the status of settlement or a 

motion to dismiss this proceeding by November 9, 2018. We caution relator that failure to 

comply with this order may result in the dismissal of his petition for writ of mandamus. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
### §685. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1011, §2, 68 Stat. 879, which provided that moneys paid under former sections 684 to 686 of this title would not be subject to liens or claims, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3501.10 What types of mineral use authorizations can I get under these rules? BLM issues the mineral use authorizations listed below to qualified individuals. Some authorizations are not available for certain commodities. See the subparts referenced in each subsection for more information. ( a ) “Prospecting permits” let you explore for leasable mineral deposits on lands where BLM has determined that prospecting is needed to determine the existence of a valuable deposit. See subpart 3505 of this part.
( b ) “Exploration licenses” let you explore in areas with known deposits of a leasable mineral to obtain data. With an exploration license, you do not get any preference or other right to a lease. See subpart 3506 of this part.
( c ) “Preference right leases” are issued to holders of prospecting permits who, during the term of the permit, demonstrate the discovery of a valuable deposit of the leasable mineral for which BLM issued the permit. There are other requirements. The requirements for mine plans are in subpart 3592 of part 3590 of this chapter. See subpart 3507 of this part.
( d ) “Competitive leases” are issued by competitive bidding for known deposits of a leasable mineral. See subpart 3508 of this part.
( e ) “Fringe acreage leases” are issued noncompetitively for known deposits of leasable minerals on Federal lands adjacent to existing deposits, when the Federal deposits can be mined only as part of an adjacent operation. See subpart 3510 of this part.
( f ) “Lease modifications” add adjacent acreage to a Federal lease. The acreage to be added: ( 1 ) Contains known deposits of the same mineral that can be mined only as part of the mining operation on the original Federal lease; or
( 2 ) Has the following characteristics— ( i ) Does not contain known deposits of the same mineral;
( ii ) Will be used for surface activities that are necessary in furtherance of recovery of the mineral deposit on the original Federal lease; and
( iii ) Had the acreage been included in the original Federal lease at the time of the Federal lease's issuance, the original Federal lease would have been reasonably compact.
( g ) “Use permits” are available to holders of phosphate and sodium leases so that they may use the surface of unappropriated and unentered public lands for the proper extraction, treatment, or removal of the phosphate or sodium deposits. See subpart 3516 of this part.
[64 FR 53536, Oct. 1, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 641, Jan. 7, 2009]