alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, P41's/R21's.                    

*Date:*                         November 5, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hua-Chuan Sim, MD, Health Science Administrator, National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: September 29, 2004

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Commmittee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-22407  Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
M&I 2011 Sch B-3A F.Z15.xlsm

9/20/2012

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF M&I VOLUNTARY PAYMENT AND SURPLUS APPLICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011

A B C D E F G HI 

Voluntary Payments Applied to Surplus (Annua

Deficit

Grand Total 

Prior 30-day Capital ARRA Deficit Ref

Current Year Total to Sch B-1 

Facility/Contractor Year window 

Ref (B+C+D) (E+F) 

Contra Costa Canal

Contra Cost WD 1/ $ 168,481.79 168,481.79 $ $ 168,481.79

Folsom D & R

City of Roseville $ 735.27 $ 735.27 $ - $ 735.27 

Folsom South Canal

East Bay MUD 1/ $ 2,840.98 $ 2,840.98 $ 2,840.98

East Bay MUD $ 125,243.40 125,243.40 $ $ 47,212.44 $ 172,455.84

Friant-Kern Canal

Lindsay-Strathmore ID $ 44.14 $ 3

Shafter Wasco ID 2/ Terra Bella ID $ 4,7

Sacramento River

City of West Sacramento $ - $ 17,317.52 $ 17,317.52 

Spring Creek Conduit

Shasta CSD $ - $ - $ 

Tehama Colusa Canal

Kanawha WD $ 17.67 $ 17.67 $ - $ 17.67 

Total $ - $ 735.27 $296,583.84 297,319.11 $ 64,529.96 $ 361,849.07 $ $ - 44.14 $ $ 5,0

Footnotes:

1/ FY 2011 overpayment applied to FY 2011 O&M deficit2/ FY 2011 Surplus Applied to FY 2011 Water Underpayment
### §5871. Penalties

Any person who violates or fails to comply with any provision of this chapter shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $10,000, or be imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 90–618, title II, §201, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1234; amended Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §227, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2030.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5871, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 729, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 90–618.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior section 5861, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 729, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 90–618.

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–473 struck out ", and shall become eligible for parole as the Board of Parole shall determine" after "or both".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §235(a)(1)(B)(ii)(IV), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2032, provided that the amendment made by section 227 of Pub. L. 98–473 is effective Oct. 12, 1984.

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of first month following October 1968, see section 207(a) of Pub. L. 90–618, set out as a note under section 5801 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22579]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, October 13, 2004.

PLACE: NTSB Board Room, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594

STATUS: The two items are open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    7671 Aviation Accident Report--In-fight Engine Failure and 
Subsequent Ditching of Air Sunshine, Inc., flight 527, Cessna 402C, 
N314AB, about 7.35 Nautical Miles West-Northwest of Treasure Cay, Great 
Abaco Island, Bahamas, July 13, 2003.
    7666 Pipeline Accident Report--Storage Tank Explosion and Fire in 
Glenpool, Oklahoma, April 7, 2003.

News Media Contact: Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Ms. 
Carolyn Dargan at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, October 8, 2004.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived Webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: October 2, 2004.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-22579 Filed 10-4-04; 12:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
§ 4300.10 On what types of public land can I obtain a reindeer grazing permit? ( a ) You may apply for public lands that are vacant and unappropriated.
( b ) You may apply for public lands which have been withdrawn for any purpose, but the Department or agency with administrative jurisdiction of the withdrawn lands must give its prior consent, and may impose terms or conditions on the use of the land.
( c ) If the lands you apply for are within natural caribou migration routes, or if they have other important values for wildlife, BLM will consult with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game before issuing a permit. BLM may include such lands in a permit at its discretion, and a permit will contain any special terms and conditions to protect wildlife resources.
----

----

# Our First Line of Defense

## ("Presidential Reflections on US Intelligence") (U)

Preface
George Washington
James K. Polk
Woodrow Wilson
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Harry S. Truman
Dwight D. Eisenhower
John F. Kennedy
Lyndon B. Johnson
Richard M. Nixon
Gerald R. Ford
Jimmy Carter
Ronald Reagan
George Bush
William J. Clinton
(Table Only) The Presidents' Directors of Central Intelligence, 1946-96

Publications Page | CSI Homepage
### §6533. Cross references

**(1) For period of limitation in respect of civil actions for fines, penalties, and forfeitures, see section 2462 of Title 28 of the United States Code.**

**(2) For extensions of time by reason of armed service in a combat zone, see section 7508.**

**(3) For suspension of running of statute until 3 years after termination of hostilities, see section 3287 of Title 18.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 816.)
#### § 3512.30 What are the responsibilities of a sublessor and a sublessee?

After BLM's approval of a sublease becomes effective, the sublessor and sublessee are jointly and severably liable for performance of all obligations under the permit or lease.
Opinion issued August 27, 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 2 4
- 00 503
- CV

——————————— ONELIA MARIEL CARRETO VAZQUES , Appellant V. JULIO ALBERTO SERRANO LANDAVERDE , Appellee

On Appeal from the 2 80 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2024
- 05694

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Onelia Mariel Carreto Vazques , has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s February 15, 2024 protective order . Appellant has neither established indigence for purposes of costs nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the prepar ation of the clerk’s record. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145; T EX
. R.2

A PP
. P

. 20.1 (a) , 37.3(b). On July 17, 2024 , appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if she did not submit written evidence that she had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record by August 16, 2024

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b) , 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss

.
#### Alfonso Casomano, Respondent, v. David Frank and Others, a Copartnership, etc., Appellants.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2003-16504; Airspace Docket No. 03-ACE-88]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Greenfield, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a direct final rule; request for comments 
that was published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, December 9, 2003 
(68 FR 68507) (FR Doc. 03-30456). It corrects an error in the 
Greenfield, IA Class E airspace area legal description.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective on 0901 UTC, April 15, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    Federal Register document 03-30456, published on Tuesday, December 
9, 2003 (68 FR 68507), modified Class E airspace at Greenfield, IA. The 
modification enlarged the controlled airspace area around Greenfield 
Municipal Airport to provide proper protection of diverse departures, 
corrected a discrepancy in the extension of controlled airspace and 
brought the Greenfield, IA Class E airspace area legal description into 
compliance with FAA Order 7400.2E, Procedures for Handling Airspace 
Matters. However, the Greenfield, IA Class E airspace area legal 
description was published incorrectly.

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Greenfield, 
IA Class E airspace, as published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, 
December 9, 2003 (68 FR 68507) (FR Doc. 03-30456), is corrected as 
follows:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

0
On page 68508, Column 2, paragraph headed ``ACE IA E5 Greenfield, IA,'' 
next to the last line, change ``northwest'' to read ``southeast.''

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on January 14, 2004.
Elizabeth S. Wallis,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 04-2184 Filed 2-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
EXHIBIT 99.1


                          [BANK OF NEW YORK LETTERHEAD]

                                BANK OF NEW YORK

                              Officer's Certificate
                              ---------------------

                                 March 30, 2004



MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.
North Tower, 7th Floor
4 World Financial Center
New York, New York 10080

                          ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Kevin Cremin, Vice-President-Business Manager of The Bank of
New York, a New York corporation (the "Trustee"), hereby certifies in such
capacity that, based on his/her knowledge, the Trustee is in compliance with all
conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the Standard Terms for
Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc.
as depositor (the "Depositor") and the Trustee, as successor to United States
Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the
"Securities Intermediary"), in each case as amended by a series supplement
between the Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities Intermediary for each
trust series listed in the attached schedule.



<PAGE>




                                Very truly yours,

                                BANK OF NEW YORK


                                By: /s/ Kevin Cremin
                                    --------------------
                                Name: Kevin Cremin
                                Title: Vice President


<PAGE>

SCHEDULE

INDEXPLUS Trust Series 2003-1
PPLUS Trust Series CSF-1
PPLUS Trust Series DCC-1
PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-2
PPLUS Trust Series HTZ-1
PPLUS Trust Series PMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series SPR-1
PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ATT-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FAR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GRC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series MSD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series UPC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 F-Z4 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 HLT-1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 H-Z3 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 IBM-Z2 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 TRV-C1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust
### **Subchapter B—Assessable Penalties**

Part
I.
General provisions.
II.
Failure to comply with certain information reporting requirements.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7711(b)(5), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2393, substituted "Failure to comply with certain information reporting requirements" for "Failure to file certain information returns or statements" in item for part II.
#### Frank Pipitone, Respondent, v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Company, Inc., Appellant.

Defendant was not in control of the ship or of the boom or shackle. Defendant did not supply the boom or the shackle and did nothing to render them defective. Its contract with the United States did not make defendant responsible to plaintiff for the condition of the ship or its machinery. *(Caldarola*v. *Moore-McCormack Lines,*295 N. Y. 463, affd. *sub nom. Caldarola*v. *Eckert,*332 U. S. 155; *Palardy*V. *American-Hawiian S. S. Co.,*169 F. 2d 619.) The findings of fact implicit in the verdict are disaffirmed. Appeal from rulings and orders made during and after trial denying defendant’s motions for a dismissal of complaint and for direction of verdict, dismissed, without costs, no formal orders having been entered thereon. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raymond J. Curtis, Appellant.

Order overruling demurrer affirmed. Judgment of conviction affirmed. All concurred.
#### § 3930.40 Assessments for missing diligence milestones.

The BLM will assess $50 for each acre in the lease for each missed diligence milestone each year, prorated on a daily basis, until the operator or lessee complies with § 3930.30(a). For example: If the operator does not submit the required POD within the required 2 years after lease issuance (the first milestone), the BLM will assess the operator $50 per acre per year until the milestone is met. If the operator does not meet the second milestone, the BLM will assess the operator an additional $50 per acre per year, resulting in a total assessment of $100 per acre per year. If the operator does not begin production by the end of the initial lease term, or make payments in lieu thereof, the BLM may initiate lease cancellation procedures (see §§ 3934.21 and 3934.22).
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


War of 1812





Contact Us
  Negotiating in War and Peace
 Diplomatic negotiations officially ended the hostilities in February 1815. The Treaty of Ghent brought peace between Britain and the United States and an end to three years of fighting that inflicted thousands of deaths and incalculable miseries. But formal diplomacy was only one kind of negotiation that occurred during the war years. From the moment the war broke out, individuals and groups engaged in complex and often ambiguous negotiations as they tried to steer a course through the conflict. Political parties negotiated with their opponents; soldiers negotiated with their officers; women negotiated new roles in society; enslaved African-Americans negotiated the territory between bondage and freedom. Those wartime negotiations did not end abruptly with the signing of an official treaty. And many of the negotiations left legacies that lingered long after the formal cessation of hostilities.
 
 Browse Stories A rowboat approaches a two-masted sailing ship flying the American flag.Voices
Hear about the conflict in the participants’ own words
A British diplomat, holding a signed treaty, shakes hands with his American counterpart.Moments
Learn about famous (and not-so-famous) events surrounding the conflict
Bear tries to negotiate between John Bull and Columbia.Perspectives
Discover how different groups regarded the conflict
A man in Western attire meets with Indian peopleNarratives
Leading historians explore the war and its significance
 Last updated: March 5, 2015
 Tools Site Index


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
§ 41.230 Transition plans. ( a ) *Submission of plans.* An institution to which § 41.225 applies and that is composed of more than one administratively separate unit may submit either a single transition plan applicable to all such units, or a separate transition plan applicable to each such unit.
( b ) *Content of plans.* In order to be approved by the Secretary of Education, a transition plan shall: ( 1 ) State the name, address, and Federal Interagency Committee on Education Code of the educational institution submitting such plan, the administratively separate units to which the plan is applicable, and the name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom questions concerning the plan may be addressed. The person who submits the plan shall be the chief administrator or president of the institution, or another individual legally authorized to bind the institution to all actions set forth in the plan.
( 2 ) State whether the educational institution or administratively separate unit admits students of both sexes as regular students and, if so, when it began to do so.
( 3 ) Identify and describe with respect to the educational institution or administratively separate unit any obstacles to admitting students without discrimination on the basis of sex.
( 4 ) Describe in detail the steps necessary to eliminate as soon as practicable each obstacle so identified and indicate the schedule for taking these steps and the individual directly responsible for their implementation.
( 5 ) Include estimates of the number of students, by sex, expected to apply for, be admitted to, and enter each class during the period covered by the plan.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* No policy or practice of a recipient to which § 41.225 applies shall result in treatment of applicants to or students of such recipient in violation of §§ 41.300 through 41.310 unless such treatment is necessitated by an obstacle identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and a schedule for eliminating that obstacle has been provided as required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) *Effects of past exclusion.* To overcome the effects of past exclusion of students on the basis of sex, each educational institution to which § 41.225 applies shall include in its transition plan, and shall implement, specific steps designed to encourage individuals of the previously excluded sex to apply for admission to such institution. Such steps shall include instituting recruitment programs that emphasize the institution's commitment to enrolling students of the sex previously excluded.
§ 45.43 What are the requirements for written interrogatories? ( a ) *Motion; limitation.* Except upon agreement of the parties: ( 1 ) A party wishing to propound interrogatories must file a motion under § 45.41(c); and
( 2 ) A party may propound no more than 25 interrogatories, counting discrete subparts as separate interrogatories, unless the ALJ approves a higher number upon a showing of good cause.
( b ) *ALJ order.* The ALJ will issue an order under § 45.41(b) with respect to any discovery motion requesting the use of written interrogatories. The order will: ( 1 ) Grant the motion and approve the use of some or all of the proposed interrogatories; or
( 2 ) Deny the motion.
( c ) *Answers to interrogatories.* Except upon agreement of the parties, the party to whom the proposed interrogatories are directed must file its answers to any interrogatories approved by the ALJ within 15 days after issuance of the order under paragraph (b) of this section. ( 1 ) Each approved interrogatory must be answered separately and fully in writing.
( 2 ) The party or its representative must sign the answers to interrogatories under oath or affirmation.
( d ) *Access to records.* A party's answer to an interrogatory is sufficient when: ( 1 ) The information may be obtained from an examination of records, or from a compilation, abstract, or summary based on such records;
( 2 ) The burden of obtaining the information from the records is substantially the same for all parties;
( 3 ) The answering party specifically identifies the individual records from which the requesting party may obtain the information and where the records are located; and
( 4 ) The answering party provides the requesting party with reasonable opportunity to examine the records and make a copy, compilation, abstract, or summary.