alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Alfred R.
Camner, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Humberto L. Lopez, Chief Financial Officer, of BankUnited Financial Corporation, a Florida corporation (the Company), each hereby certifies that:



| | (1) |  | The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  /s/  Alfred R. CamnerAlfred R. Camner  Dated: February 14, 2003 |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  /s/  Humberto L. LopezHumberto L. Lopez  Dated: February 14, 2003 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |
JUANA L. EVANKS DAVIS, as

Personal Representative of the Estate of

KENGGE A. EVANKS DAVIS,

Decedent,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, Ltd., 

Defendant.

________________________________/

AGREED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court and the Court having been advised that 

the Parties are in agreement to Arbitrate pursuant to the terms of the decedent’s employment 

contract, the Court hereby Grants the Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration. It is further 

also;

ADJUDGED that the:

1. Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration is GRANTED.

2. This case is administratively CLOSED, and all other pending motions are

DENIED as MOOT.

3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce an arbitral award. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida, this 16th

day of June, 2020. 

_________________________________ 

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

U.S. District Court Judge 

Cc: Louis A. Vucci, Esq., Via Email: vuccilawgroup@gmail.com

Michael Sokolson, Esq., Via Email: michaels@maltzmanpartners.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case NO.:20-cv-22181 

Case 1:20-cv-22181-JEM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2020 Page 1 of 1
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-____.]

D ISCIPLINARY C OUNSEL v . H ALE . [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5079.] (No. 2013-1622

— Submitted July 21, 2016

— Decided July 25, 2016.)
O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further c onsideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by res pondent, Harland Hanna Hale, Attorney Registration No. 0023464, last known busin ess address in Columbus, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 18, 2014, wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this cour t that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale , 141 Ohio St.3d 518, 2014-Ohio-5053, 26 N.E.3d 785.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

________________________
** **

**Exhibit 99.3**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wade Cook FinancialCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Wade B. Cook, Chief Executive Officer and acting ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

                                                (1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

                                                (2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|   |   | /s/  Wade Cook                |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Wade B. Cook                       |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer, and Chief |
|   |   | Financial Officer                  |
|   |   | November 29, 2002                  |

 

 

1

----
#### Brogdon *v.*Brogdon.

February 15, 1911.

Habeas corpus. Before Judge Kimsey. Gwinnett superior court. January 10, 1910.

*B. A. Nix,*for plaintiff in error. I. *L. O alces,*contra.

Beck, *J.*

The evidence in this case being conflicting as to whether the husband, against whom habeas-corpus proceedings had been instituted by his wife to secure possession of their minor child five years of age, was a fit and proper person to have the custody and' control of the child, there was no abuse of the^ discretion vested in the habeas-corpus court in awarding the custody of the child to the mother.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices eoneur.*
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTesting, analysis, and code verification of aerodynamics and heat transfer related to turbomachineryDiscussed here are the writing of a data acquisition code and the installation and testing of new pressure and temperature instrumentation to be used in the testing and evaluation of miniature heat flux sensors. A brief summary of the problem which led to the need for these tests is presented as well as a proposed data acquisition program and the results of investigations of two measurement systems, the Omega OM-900 temperature sensing system and the Scani-Valve Hyscan pressure measurement system.Document ID19910017846Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKing, Paul I.*(Cleveland State Univ. OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 15, 1991Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberORS-KGG-R1NASA-CR-188640NAS 1.26:188640Accession Number91N27160Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC3-195Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910017846.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**VIA	Rail	Inc. –**  **Accessible	sleeper –**  **Top	view (Uwe	Rutenberg)** 

**(Drawings	and	pictures	used	with	permission	of	VIA	Rail	Canada	Inc.		These**

**images	are	not	available	for	commercial	use.)**

Fig. 1	Toilet/shower/vanity	section	with	main	entrance	at	right	side	(rear	of wheelchair)

Fig.	2	Left	side	shows	sleeper	section,	sofa	L - shape	was	eliminated,	now	just	straight along	left	wall
§ 3809.301 Where do I file my notice and what information must I include in it? ( a ) If you qualify under § 3809.21, you must file your notice with the local BLM office with jurisdiction over the lands involved. BLM does not require that the notice be on a particular form.
( b ) To be complete, your notice must include the following information: ( 1 ) *Operator Information.* The name, mailing address, phone number, taxpayer identification number of the operator(s), and the BLM serial number(s) of any unpatented mining claim(s) where the disturbance would occur. If the operator is a corporation, you must identify one individual as the point of contact;
( 2 ) *Activity Description, Map, and Schedule of Activities.* A description of the proposed activity with a level of detail appropriate to the type, size, and location of the activity. The description must include the following: ( i ) The measures that you will take to prevent unnecessary or undue degradation during operations;
( ii ) A map showing the location of your project area in sufficient detail for BLM to be able to find it and the location of access routes you intend to use, improve, or construct;
( iii ) A description of the type of equipment you intend to use; and
( iv ) A schedule of activities, including the date when you expect to begin operations and the date you expect to complete reclamation;
( 3 ) *Reclamation Plan.* A description of how you will complete reclamation to the standards described in § 3809.420; and
( 4 ) *Reclamation cost estimate.* An estimate of the cost to fully reclaim your operations as required by § 3809.552.
( c ) BLM may require you to provide additional information, if necessary to ensure that your operations will comply with this subpart.
( d ) You must notify BLM in writing within 30 calendar days of any change of operator or corporate point of contact, or of the mailing address of the operator or corporate point of contact.
§ 420.24 Permits for organized events. Regional Directors may issue permits for the operation of off-road vehicles in organized races, rallies, meets, endurance contests, and other events on areas designed for each event. The application for such an event shall: ( a ) Be received by the Regional Director at least 60 days before the event;
( b ) Provide a plan for restoration and rehabilitation of trails and areas used, and demonstrate that the prospective permittee can be bonded for or deposit the amount that may be required to cover the cost;
( c ) Demonstrate that special precautions will be taken to: ( 1 ) Protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public; and
( 2 ) Minimize damage to the land and related resources.
( d ) Application fees (in amounts to be determined) as authorized by section 2 of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (78 Stat. 897), as amended, shall accompany all applications.
# OUTPUT

Schedule B-1Page &P of &N

Schedule B-1Page &P of &N
§ 36.6 NEPA compliance and lead agency. ( a ) The provisions of NEPA and the Council for Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508) will be applied to determine whether an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required, or that a categorical exclusion applies. ( 1 ) The lead agency, with cooperation of all appropriate Federal agencies, shall complete an EA or a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) within nine months of the date the SF 299 was filed.
( 2 ) If the lead agency determines, for good cause, that the nine-month period is insufficient, it may extend such period for a reasonable specific time. Notification of the extension, together with the reasons therefore, shall be provided to the applicant and published in the Federal Register at least 30 days prior to the end of the nine-month period.
( 3 ) If the lead agency determines that an EIS is not required, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) will be prepared.
( 4 ) If an EIS is determined to be necessary, the lead agency shall hold a public hearing on the joint DEIS in Washington, DC, and at least one location in Alaska.
( 5 ) The appropriate Federal agencies shall solicit and consider the views of other Federal departments and agencies, the Alaska Land Use Council, the State, affected units of local government in the State and affected corporations formed pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. After public notice, the agencies shall receive and consider statements and recommendations regarding the application submitted by interested individuals and organizations.
( 6 ) The lead agency shall ensure compliance with section 810 of ANILCA.
( b ) When an EIS is determined to be necessary, within three months of completing the DEIS or within one year of the filing of the application, whichever is later, the lead agency shall complete the EIS and publish a notice of its availability in the Federal Register.
( c ) Cost reimbursement. ( 1 ) The costs to the United States of application processing, other than costs for EIS preparation and review as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, shall be reimbursed by the applicant, if such reimbursement is required pursuant to the applicable law and procedures of the appropriate Federal agency incurring the costs.
( 2 ) The reasonable administrative and other costs of EIS preparation shall be reimbursed by the applicant, according to the BLM's cost recovery procedures and regulations implementing section 304 of FLPMA, 43 U.S.C. 1734.
#### § 4.452-9 Appeal to Board.

Any party, including the Government, adversely affected by the decision of the administrative law judge may appeal to the Board as provided in § 4.410, and the general rules in Subpart B of this part. No further hearing will be allowed in connection with the appeal to the Board but the Board, after considering the evidence, may remand any case for further hearing if it considers such action necessary to develop the facts.
### §158. Investment of proceeds of lands

The Secretary of the Interior shall invest in a manner which shall be in his judgment most safe and beneficial for the fund, all moneys that may be received under treaties containing stipulations for the payment to the Indians, annually, of interest upon the proceeds of the lands ceded by them; and he shall make no investment of such moneys, or of any portion, at a lower rate of interest than 5 per centum per annum.

(R.S. §2096.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2096 derived from act Jan. 9, 1837, ch. 1, §4, 5 Stat. 135.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSeparation characteristics of generic stores from lee side of an inclined flat plate at Mach 6An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the aerodynamic characteristics of a store as it was separated from the lee side of a flat plate inclined at 15 deg to the free-stream flow at Mach 6. Two store models were tested: a cone cylinder and a roof delta. Force and moment data were obtained for both stores as they were moved in 0.5-in. increments away from the flat plate lee-side separated flow region into the free-stream flow while the store angle of attack was held constant at either 0 deg or 15 deg. The results indicate that both stores had adverse separation characteristics (i.e., negative normal force and pitching moment) at an angle of attack of 0 deg, and the cone cylinder had favorable separation characteristics (i.e., positive normal force and pitching moment) at an angle of attack of 15 deg. At an angle of attack of 15 deg, the separation characteristics of the roof delta are indeterminate at small separation distances and favorable at greater separation distances. These characteristics are the result of the local flow inclination relative to the stores as they traversed through the flat plate lee-side flow field. In addition to plotted data, force and moment data are tabulated and schlieren photographs of the stores and flat plate are presented.Document ID19960002990Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWilcox, Floyd J., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1995Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-4652NAS 1.15:4652L-17384Accession Number96N12999Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-59-30-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960002990.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### National Communications System

# AGENCY:

National Communications System (NCS), Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

A meeting of the Telecommunications Service Priority (TSP) System Oversight Committee will convene Tuesday, November 9, 2004, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon. The meeting will be held at 701 South Courthouse Road, Arlington, VA in the NCS conference room on the 2nd floor.

—TSP Program Update

—TSP Revalidation Update

—PSWG Update

Anyone interested in attending or presenting additional information to the Committee, please contact Susan Flint, Office of Priority Telecommunications, (703) 607-4932. Media or Press must contact Mr. Steve Barrett (703) 607-6211.

Peter M. Fonash,

Certifying Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-22631 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-10-M
#### § 404.14 How will Reclamation provide notice of opportunities for assistance under the program?

Notice of opportunities for assistance to conduct an appraisal investigation or a feasibility study under § 404.11(a) or (b) will be posted as a program announcement on the required government-wide Web site for announcement of Federal assistance opportunities. Opportunities for assistance will also be advertised locally by Reclamation regional and area offices. You are encouraged to contact your local Reclamation office to find out about upcoming program announcements and to discuss your interest in the program.
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                   ------------



    FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION ANNOUNCES RESIGNATION OF DIVISIONAL EXECUTIVE

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla., July 25, 2003 - First Advantage Corporation (NASDAQ:
FADV), a leading national provider of enterprise and consumer screening
solutions, today announced the resignation of Roopal Shah, president of the
Motor Vehicle Records Services division and American Driving Records of Rancho
Cordova, Calif. Shah will stay with the company until his successor has been
appointed.

"Roopal Shah has been key to the success of American Driving Records over the
years and his talents and insight will certainly be missed on the executive
team," said John Long, First Advantage chief executive officer and president.
"With his help and that of the ADR management team, we will recruit a capable
successor to seamlessly continue the execution of the divisional business plan."

Shah, who is departing to pursue other business interests, said, "It is with
regret that my other endeavors have necessitated my departure from First
Advantage. As a supporter of the company, I wish John Long and all the other
members of the First Advantage team success."

About First Advantage Corporation

First Advantage Corporation (NASDAQ: FADV) provides best-in-class single-source
solutions for enterprise and consumer screening and risk mitigation needs,
incorporating state-of-the-art technology, proprietary systems and data
resources. Created by the merger of The First American Corporation's (NYSE: FAF)
Screening Technologies division with US SEARCH.com, First Advantage is a leading
national provider in the screening industry, ranking among the top three
companies in nearly all of its business lines. The company offers multiple
products and services including employment background screening, drug-free
workplace programs, physical exams and other occupational health testing,
resident screening services, motor vehicle records and consumer location
services. Headquartered in St. Petersburg, Fla., with major offices in Los
Angeles, Concord and Sacramento, Calif.; Milwaukee; Bethesda and Rockville, Md.;
Denver; and Bangalore, India, the company has nearly 1,000 employees. Further
information about the company is available at www.FADV.com.



                                      # # #
§ 3436.1-1 Qualified lease proponents. ( a ) Coal lease exchanges under this program shall be available only to persons who: ( 1 ) Hold a Federal coal lease or preference right lease application covering lands that include or are near an alluvial valley floor located west of the 100th Meridian, west longitude, where surface coal mining operations are prohibited by section 510(b)(5) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act because such operations would interrupt farming or materially damage the quantity and quality of the water in surface or underground water systems that would supply the alluvial valley floor;
( 2 ) Have made substantial financial and legal commitments prior to January 1, 1977, in connection with the lease or preference right lease application; and
( 3 ) Are not entitled to continue any existing surface coal mining operations pursuant to the first proviso of section 510(b)(5) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act.
( b ) Persons seeking an exchange bear the burden of establishing that they are qualified pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section. The Secretary shall accept a determination made pursuant to 30 CFR 785.19(c) as conclusive evidence of the existence of an alluvial valley floor.