alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 42—PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS; AND CERTAIN OTHER TAX-EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS**

Subchapter
Sec. 1
A.
Private foundations
4940

B.
Black lung benefit trusts
4951
C.
Political expenditures of section 501(c)(3) organizations
4955
D.
Failure by certain charitable organizations to meet certain qualification requirements
4958
E.
Abatement of first and second tier taxes in certain cases
4961
F.
Tax shelter transactions
4965
G.
Donor advised funds
4966
H.
Excise tax based on investment income of private colleges and universities
4968

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13701(b), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2168, added item for subchapter H.

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–280, title XII, §1231(b)(2), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 1098, which directed the addition of item for subchapter G to the analysis for chapter 42 without specifying the act to be amended, was executed by adding the item to this analysis, which is for chapter 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 109–222, title V, §516(a)(2), May 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 371, added item for subchapter F.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–168, title XIII, §1311(c)(6), July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1478, struck out item for subchapter D "Abatement of first and second-tier taxes in certain cases" and added items for subchapters D and E.

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10712(c)(7), (9), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–467, substituted in chapter heading "AND CERTAIN OTHER TAX-EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS" for "BLACK LUNG BENEFIT TRUSTS", struck out item for subchapter C "Abatement of first and second tier taxes in certain cases", and added items for subchapters C and D.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title III, §305(b)(3), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 784, substituted "Abatement of first and second tier taxes in certain cases" for "Abatement of second tier taxes where there is correction during correction period" in item for subchapter C.

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–596, §2(c)(3), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3474, added item for subchapter C.

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–227, §4(c)(2)(A), Feb. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 22, in chapter heading inserted "; BLACK LUNG BENEFIT TRUSTS" after "FOUNDATIONS", and added items for subchapters A and B.

**1969**—Pub. L. 91–172, title I, §101(b), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 498, added chapter heading "PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS".

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
#### § 3516.15 How do I apply for a use permit?

You must file three copies of your application in the BLM office administering the lands you are interested in. There is no specific form required. Include the filing fee for a use permit found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter and the first year's rental. Calculate the rental in accordance with § 3504.15 of this part.

[64 FR 53536, Oct. 1, 1999, as amended at 72 FR 50888, Sept. 5, 2007]
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Grade Crossing Commissioners of the City of Buffalo for the Appointment of Commissioners to Ascertain the Compensation to Be Paid to the Owners of and Parties Interested in Lands Claimed to Be Injured by Change of Grade, etc., and Claimed to Be Owned by Peter Hof and Others. Proceeding No. 98. The City of Buffalo and Others, Appellants; Menno A. Reeb and Others, Respondents.

Order and report reversed as to parcel Ho. 2, owned by the Otis Elevator Company, and a new hearing and appraisal directed to be had before new commissioners, as to that parcel, with costs to appellants to abide event. Held, that it does not appear that the depression in the grade of Ferry street in front of the lands of the Otis Elevator Company abutting upon that street from three to four feet has prevented the .possibility "of a switch track across Ferry street at that point into the elevator company’s property. So far as appears if the right to lay such a track across Ferry street can be secured, the track can be laid at the present grade bf Ferry street and the necessary excavations made on either side to permit the laying of such switch track at that grade. Order and report'affirmed as to parcels Hos. 20 and 82, with costs, and affirmed as to parcel Ho. 5, without costs. Held, that the records of the established and recorded grades of the streets, the grade of which was changed, were properly received to support the awards, and they are sufficient for that purpose. Robson, Foote and Merrell, JJ., concurred; Kruse, P. J., and Lambert, J., concurred, except as to parcel Ho. 2, voting for affirmance as td that parcel.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: March 15, 2007



/s/ DAVID S. SMITHDavid S. SmithPresident and Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is
not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The foregoing certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Wilfred Sanchez, Respondent, against Philip Ross, Doing business as Ross Equipment Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

*931All concur.
### §5101. Allotment of land on Indian reservations

On and after June 18, 1934, no land of any Indian reservation, created or set apart by treaty or agreement with the Indians, Act of Congress, Executive order, purchase, or otherwise, shall be allotted in severalty to any Indian.

(June 18, 1934, ch. 576, §1, 48 Stat. 984.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 461 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2004 Amendment

Pub. L. 108–204, §1(a), Mar. 2, 2004, 118 Stat. 542, provided that: "This Act [amending section 5123 of this title and former sections 640d–24 and 712e of this title and provisions set out as notes under section 301 of Title 7, Agriculture, section 7420 of Title 10, Armed Forces, and section 431 of Title 16, Conservation] may be cited as the 'Native American Technical Corrections Act of 2004'."

#### Short Title of 1994 Amendment

Pub. L. 103–454, title I, §101, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4791, provided that: "This title [enacting sections 5130 and 5131 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 5130 of this title] may be cited as the 'Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994'."

#### Short Title

Act June 18, 1934, ch. 576, 48 Stat. 984, which enacted this section and sections 5102, 5103, 5107 to 5113, 5115, 5116, 5118, 5120, 5121, 5123 to 5125, and 5129 of this title, is popularly known as the "Indian Reorganization Act".
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection with the Annual Report of Star E Media Corp. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-KSB  for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about April 16, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Joseph Bevacqua, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Sec.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  Information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  April  16,  2003                             /s/ Joseph Bevacqua
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Joseph  Bevacqua
                                                    Chief  Financial  Officer


A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Star  E Media Corp. and will be retained by Star E Media Corp. and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Willis H. Newton, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 11, 2004
#### § 4.1262 Where to file.

The application shall be filed with the administrative law judge to whom the case has been assigned. If no assignment has been made, the application shall be filed in the Hearings Division, OHA.

[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 67 FR 4368, Jan. 30, 2002; 88 FR 5795, Jan. 30, 2023]
### §70w. Repealed. May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §142, 63 Stat. 110

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 959, §24, 60 Stat. 1055, related to Indian claims accruing after Aug. 13, 1946. See section 1505 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
#### § 3135.5 When should I stop paying rental or royalty after BLM requires or approves a suspension of operations and production ?

You should stop paying rental or royalty on the first day of the month that the suspension is effective. However, if there is any production sold or removed during that month, you must pay royalty on that production.

[67 FR 17886, Apr. 11, 2002]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GREGORY E. WALKER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 16

- 16715
D.C. No. 2:14

- cv - 00480

- JCM

- PAL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 6, 2017 ** San Francisco, California Before: RAWLINSON and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and RICE, *** Chief District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Thomas O. Rice, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

DEC 26 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 16715

Gregory E. Walker appeals the district court’s order affirming the Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for disability benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We revie w the district court’s order de novo and may reverse the agency’s denial of benefits only if the ALJ’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence or contains legal error. Garrison v. Colvin , 759 F.3d 995, 1009

- 10 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.
Wal ker argues the ALJ erred in failing to explain why the Residual Functional Capacity (RFC) departed from the “accepted” or “adopted” finding that
Walker was limited to one

- and two

- step tasks, as opined by the reviewing

p rovider Sally Skewis, Ph.D. Notably , Walker does not challenge the weight given to any medical opinion or the ALJ’s finding that Walker was not entirely credible.
A review of the ALJ’s decision demonstrates the ALJ did not accept or adopt the limitation t o one - and two

- step tasks , althoug h the ALJ adopted a separate portion of Dr. Skewis’ s opinion

. As such, Walker’s argument is based on a false premise and thus fails. Walker does not otherwise argue the RFC
determination was not supported by substantial evidence . Accordingly, Walker
has waived any additional argument that the RFC was not supported by substantial
evidence. Maldonado v. Morales , 556 F.3d 1037, 1048 n.4 (9th Cir. 2009) (“Arguments made in passing and inadequately briefed are waived.”).3 16

- 16715

Moreover, the ALJ found Walker was no t eligible for benefits because
Walker was non

- compliant with his treatment regimen without providing a good

reason. This is an independent basis for denying Walker’s application. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1530 (b)

. Walker never challenged this finding and thus waives the
argument

. Maldonado , 556 F.3d at 1048 n. 4. As a result, any purported error in Walker’s assigned RFC would be harmless.
AFFIRMED.
#### Thomas J. Bata et al., Respondents, v. Jan A. Bata, Appellant; Stewart O. Day, as Administrator of the Estate of Frank Muska, Deceased, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Everett Gowa, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNonlinear analysis and redesign of the mixed-mode bending delamination testThe Mixed Mode Bending (MMB) test uses a lever to simultaneously apply mode I and mode II loading to a split beam specimen. An iterative analysis that accounts for the geometric nonlinearity of the MMB test was developed. The analysis accurately predicted the measured load displacement response and the strain energy release rate, G, of an MMB test specimen made of APC2 (AS4/PEEK). The errors in G when calculated using linear theory were found to be as large as thirty percent in some cases. Because it would be inconvenient to use a nonlinear analysis to analyze MMB data, the MMB apparatus was redesigned to minimize the nonlinearity. The nonlinear analysis was used as a guide in redesigning the MMB apparatus. With the redesigned apparatus, loads were applied through a roller attached to the level and loaded just above the midplane of the test specimen. The redesigned apparatuus has geometric nonlinearity errors of less than three percent, even for materials substantially tougher than APC2. This apparatus was demonstrated by measuring the mixed mode delamination fracture toughness of APC2.Document ID19910010169Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsReeder, J. R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Crews, J. H., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102777NASA-TM-102777Accession Number91N19482Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-01-05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910010169.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4668 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

400 North Main Street in Belen, New Mexico, as the ‘‘U.S. Senator 

Dennis Cha ́vez Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2022 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 400 North Main Street in Belen, New Mexico, 

as the ‘‘U.S. Senator Dennis Cha ́vez Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. U.S. SENATOR DENNIS CHA ́ VEZ POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 400 North Main Street in Belen, 

6 New Mexico, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘U.S. 

7 Senator Dennis Cha ́vez Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4668 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘U.S. Senator Dennis 

3 Cha ́vez Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             736
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   736
<PP&E>                                          388629
<DEPRECIATION>                                  264485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1408833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4422511
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                         14659
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3028338)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1408833
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 19224<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                982096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (962872)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (982096)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (962872)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.066)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Share of net income in jointly controlled company
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### §756. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1207, §16, 68 Stat. 1103, which related to cancellation of debts of the tribe to the United States, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Julius Lichtenstein, Respondent, v. Regal Motor Car Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 3934.40 Payments due.

If a lease is canceled or relinquished for any reason, all bonus, rentals, royalties, and minimum royalties paid will be forfeited, and any amounts not paid will be immediately payable to the United States.
#### § 3504.70 When will BLM terminate the period of liability of my bond?

BLM may terminate the period of liability for any bond only when you have filed an acceptable replacement bond or when you have met all your permit or lease terms and conditions.