UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:20-cv-21984-DPG

AARON SILBERMAN

and AMJ MISIL AB LLC,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

PREMIER BEAUTY AND HEALTH LLC, 

JORGE HANE, 

and FLORENCIA HANE,

Defendants.

________________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes’ Report 

and Recommendation Re: Cross-Motions for Summary Judgement (the “Report”). [ECF No. 364].

On February 15, 2023, Defendants Premier Beauty and Health LLC, Jorge Hane, and Florencia Hane 

filed their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Counts I, II, III, IV, V, and VIII of Plaintiffs’ 

Amended Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. [ECF No. 264]. On February 15, 2023, 

Plaintiff AMJ Misil AB LLC (“AMJ”) filed its Motion for Final Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 

268]. On April 13, 2023, AMJ was granted leave to file an amended motion for summary judgment,

[ECF No. 315], which it filed on April 19, 2023, [ECF No. 316]. On April 10, 2023, the case was 

referred to Otazo-Reyes, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for a ruling on all pretrial, nondispositive matters, and for a report and recommendation on any dispositive matters. [ECF No. 309].

Judge Otazo-Reyes’ Report recommends that the Court deny Defendants’ Motion for Partial 

Summary Judgment, AMJ’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment, and AMJ’s Amended Motion for 

Case 1:20-cv-21984-DPG Document 368 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/18/2023 Page 1 of 3
2

Partial Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 364]. On September 14, 2023, AMJ filed its Corrected 

Objections to Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes’ Report and Recommendation Re: Cross-Motions for 

Summary Judgment.

1 [ECF No. 366]. Defendants did not timely object to the Report, so their 

objections will not be considered. [ECF No. 367].

A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which 

objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings 

that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see 

also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific 

objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint 

Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 

208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). 

This Court, having conducted a de novo review of the record, agrees with Judge OtazoReyes’ well-reasoned analysis and agrees that the matters must be denied.

Accordingly, after careful consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) AMJ Misil AB LLC’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes’ Report and 

Recommendation Re: Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, [ECF No. 365], and 

Corrected Objections to Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes’ Report and 

Recommendation Re: Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, [ECF No. 366], are 

OVERRULED;

1 AMJ initially filed its Objections to Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes’ Report and Recommendation Re: Cross-Motions 

for Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 365]. This Court deems AMJ’s original Objections, [ECF No. 365], to be subsumed 

in its Corrected Objections, [ECF No. 366].

Case 1:20-cv-21984-DPG Document 368 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/18/2023 Page 2 of 3
3

(2) Magistrate Judge Otazo-Reyes’ Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 364], is 

AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order by reference;

(3) Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Counts I, II, III, IV, V, and

VIII of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, 

[ECF No. 264], is DENIED;

(4) AMJ Misil AB LLC’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment, [ECF No. 268], is 

DENIED;

(5) AMJ Misil AB LLC’s Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, [ECF 

No. 316], is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 18th day of September, 2023. 

________________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-21984-DPG Document 368 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/18/2023 Page 3 of 3