alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from  delSECUR   CORPORATION   August  31,  1999  consolidated
                  financial  statements  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
                  reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                              0000894498
<NAME>                                             delSECUR CORPORATION

<CURRENCY>                                         Canadian dollars



<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                              AUG-31-1999

<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                 .66854

<CASH>                                                          9,941
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   383,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                436,995
<PP&E>                                                          319,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  (159,039)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  596,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           2,225,216
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        19,862
<OTHER-SE>                                                      (1,654,597)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    596,997
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                0
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                892,209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              5,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (892,209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (892,209)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (892,209)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (.06)



</TABLE>
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Ratesetting
            - CVP Annual Ratebooks & Schedules
            - CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2013

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP)                  - About the CVP
                - Water Info Links
                - Ratesetting
                - Projects/Activities
                - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation                         of the CVP and SWP
                - Laws/Regs/Links
                - Financial Information 
                - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
              - Programs & Activities
              - Projects & Facilities
              - Doing Business with Reclamation
              - Public Affairs
              - Employment
              - Recreation
              - Site Index
              - Contact Us

## CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2013

*Note:  Documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) require Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher to view, download Adobe Acrobat Reader*

*Last Updated: 7/15/20*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

          - Contact Us
          - Site Index
          - Accessibility
          - Disclaimer
          - DOI
          - FOIA
          - No Fear Act
          - Notices
          - Privacy Policy
          - Quality of Information
          - Recreation.gov
          - USA.gov
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENTACCOUNTANTS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors

Landmark Bancorp, Inc.:

 

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-103091on Form S-8 of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated February 27,2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. asof December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows forthe years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the three months ended December 31,2001 and the year ended September 30, 2001, respectively, which report appearsin the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of LandmarkBancorp, Inc.  Our report refers to achange in method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets.

 

 
| /s/  KPMG LLP |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
|                    |
| Kansas City, Missouri   |
| March 30, 2004     |

 

1

----
#### Meldrim *v.*McDonough *et al.,*trustees.

February 20, 1911.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Charlton. Chatham superior court. December 18, 19‘09.

*P. W. Meldrim,*for plaintiff in error. *Hitch & Denmark,*contra.

Beck, J.

Under the evidence and pleadings in this case, the court did not err in overruling the objections to the confirmation of the sale made under a decree of foreclosure providing that the sale made thereunder should be subject to the. approval and confirmation of the court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-21946-UU

VICTOR ARIZA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

KITH TREATS, LLC, a foreign limited

liability company,

Defendant.

______________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby provides notice 

that the parties have reached a settlement in principle and will be executing necessary paperwork 

resolving all claims and matters in the case. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the 

Court stay all further proceedings for twenty (20) days for the parties to complete the settlement 

paperwork and file a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice.

DATED: June 12, 2020.

Respectfully submitted, 

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

8751 W. Broward Blvd., Suite 303 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Plantation, FL 33324 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595

Case 1:20-cv-21946-UU Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 12, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing document with 

the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served 

this day on all counsel and parties of record identified on the below Service List in the manner 

specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in 

some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive 

electronically Notices of Electronic Filing

By s/ Roderick V. Hannah

RODKERICK V. HANNAH

Fla. Bar No. 435384

Service List

Roderick V. Hannah, Esq. Pelayo M. Duran, Esq.

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

8751 W. Broward Blvd., Suite 303 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Plantation, FL 33324 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

(via CM/ECF) Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com

(via CM/ECF)

Kith Treats LLC

c/o Kristin J. Achterhof, Esq.

KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP

Email: kristin.achterhof@katten.com

525 West Monroe Street

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 902-5296

(Via e-mail)

Case 1:20-cv-21946-UU Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2020 Page 2 of 2
(No. 1065

Claim denied.)

#### Michael Jordan, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 14, 1926.*

Statute of *limitations*— when *claim barred by.*All claims against the State not filed within five years from the time of their accrual are barred by the statute of limitations, except as to persons under disability. (Par. 10, Sec. I, Court of Claims Act 1917.)

Scott, Bancroft, Martin, for claimant.

Oscar, E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank B. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant was a practicing attorney in the city of Boston, Massachusetts, on or about the thirtieth day of September, 1915, and it is alleged by claimant that Hon. Patrick J. Lucey, then Attorney General of the State of Illinois, entered into an arrangement with the claimant to perform certain legal services in connection with a certain suit by the People of the State of Illinois against one Samuel B. Baymond, formerly county treasurer of Cook county, Illinois, for recovery of inheritance taxes collected by him as such treasurer; that claimant received a payment of $500.00 as retainer and that the sum of money involved was a considerable amount.

There is no controversy at this time on the question of the amount of services or value of such services. The only question before the court for consideration, is raised by the defendant, the State of Illinois, in its plea of the Statute of Limitations.

After consideration of the pleas and exhibits filed, and argument of counsel, it appears to the court that more than five years had elapsed before the filing of the claim in this court and that there appears to be no new promise or any other element that would take the matter out of the Statute *226of Limitations and also in view of Paragraph 10 of Section 1 of the Court of Claims Act, which reads as follows: “Every claim against the State, cognizable by the Court of Claims, shall be forever barred unless the claim is filed with the Secretary of the court within five years after the claim first accrues, saving to infants, idiots, lunatics, insane persons and persons under disability at the time the claim accrued, two years from the time the disability is removed,” it is considered by the court that said action cannot be maintained in this court.

It is therefore considered by the court that the plea of the Statute of Limitations be sustained and for that reason the case is dismissed.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Steve Harris, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Keith Scott, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Steve Harris, appellant pro se.Keith Scott, respondent pro se (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of Newburgh, Orange County (Paul D. Trachte, J.), entered October 21, 2015. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $5,000, alleging that defendant refused to return a vehicle belonging to plaintiff that defendant had been storing at defendant's business address. After a nonjury trial, the City Court found that there was no agreement in terms between the parties; that defendant was no longer in possession of the car, which had been dropped off at defendant's property sometime between 2002 and 2007; and that plaintiff had failed to offer any proof of the value of the car. Accordingly, the court dismissed the action.</p><p>In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (UCCA 1807; <i>see</i> UCCA 1804; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000]). Furthermore, the determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (<i>see Vizzari v State of New York</i>, 184 AD2d 564 [1992]; <i>Kincade v Kincade</i>, 178 <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>AD2d 510, 511 [1991]). This deference applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (<i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126).</p><p>Upon a review of the record, we find that the judgment provided the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UCCA 1804, 1807). We note that this court may not consider any evidence which is dehors the record (<i>see Chimarios v Duhl</i>, 152 AD2d 508 [1989]).</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. </p><p>BRANDS, J.P., TOLBERT and RUDERMAN, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: June 21, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 CASE NO. 20-60968-CIV-ALTMAN/Hunt 

DANEETO HOWARD, 

 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

IFIXANDREPAIR, LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

________________________________/ 

ORDER 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for 

Approval of Settlement Agreement and Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice [ECF No. 10] (the 

“Motion”). The Plaintiff attached to the Motion the parties’ fully executed Settlement Agreement 

[ECF No. 10-1], which indicates that the “payment represents the full amount of potential overtime 

and liquidation that Plaintiff claims.” See Settlement Agreement ¶ 4. As part of the settlement, the 

parties also reached an amicable resolution with respect to the amount of the Plaintiff’s attorneys’ 

fees and costs. The parties attached to the Motion an Invoice [ECF No. 10-2], which details 

counsel’s work on this matter. 

Based on a careful review of the record and the settlement agreement, the Court finds that 

both the settlement of this action and the requested attorneys’ fees are fair and reasonable. 

Accordingly, the Court hereby

ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows: 

1. The Motion [ECF No. 10] is GRANTED. 

2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and 

fees, except as otherwise agreed. 

Case 0:20-cv-60968-RKA Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

3. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. Any pending deadlines and hearings 

are TERMINATED. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 29th day of June 2020. 

 _________________________________ 

 ROY K. ALTMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record 

Case 0:20-cv-60968-RKA Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 3265.12 What will BLM do if my operations do not comply with my permit and applicable regulations? ( a ) We will issue you a written Incident of Noncompliance, directing you to take required corrective action within a specific time period. If the noncompliance continues or is of a serious nature, we will take one or more of the following actions: ( 1 ) Enter your lease, and correct any deficiencies at your expense;
( 2 ) Collect all or part of your bond;
( 3 ) Direct modification or shutdown of your operations; and
( 4 ) Take other enforcement action under subpart 3213 against a lessee who is ultimately responsible for noncompliance.
( b ) Noncompliance may result in BLM terminating your lease. See §§ 3213.17 through 3213.19.
### §4140. Continued use of amounts for affordable housing

Any funds for programs for low-income housing under the United States Housing Act of 1937 [42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.] that, on the date of the applicability of this chapter to an Indian tribe, are owned by, or in the possession or under the control of, the Indian housing authority for the tribe, including all reserves not otherwise obligated, shall be considered assistance under this chapter and subject to the provisions of this chapter relating to use of such assistance.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title II, §210, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4036.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The United States Housing Act of 1937, referred to in text, is act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 896, as revised generally by Pub. L. 93–383, title II, §201(a), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 653, which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§1437 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1437 of Title 42 and Tables.

The date of the applicability of this chapter, referred to in text, probably means the effective date of Pub. L. 104–330, which is Oct. 1, 1997, except as otherwise expressly provided. See section 107 of Pub. L. 104–330, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4101 of this title.

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–330, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4016, known as the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4101 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1997, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 107 of Pub. L. 104–330, set out as a note under section 4101 of this title.
From: Ziruolo, Julie A <julie_ziruolo@nps.gov> on behalf of IMR Regional Director, NPS 

<imr_regional_director@nps.gov> 

Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 3:14 PM

To: jruch@peer.org <jruch@peer.org> 

Cc: Lowery, Doris <Doris_Lowery@nps.gov>; Dennis, John <John_Dennis@nps.gov>; Carpenter, Jennifer C 

<Jennifer_Carpenter@nps.gov>; Brunnemann, Eric J <Eric_Brunnemann@nps.gov> 

Subject: Interim Response to Information Quality Act Complaint for PAIS Sea Turtle Program 

United States Department of the Interior

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

INTERIOR REGIONS 6, 7 & 8

12795 W. Alameda Parkway

Lakewood, CO 80228

July 24, 2020 

Mr. Jeff Ruch

PEER Pacific Director

Via E-mail – No Hard Copy to Follow

jruch@peer.org

Dear Mr. Ruch: 

We are in receipt of your formal letter of complaint regarding “Review of the Sea Turtle Science and 

Recovery Program, Padre Island National Seashore,” dated July 16, 2020. We will provide you with a 

response in the next 60 days. 

Thank you, 

Michael T. Reynolds 

Regional Director 

cc: Doris Lowery, NPS

John Dennis, NPS 

Jennifer Carpenter, NPS

Eric Brunnemann, PAIS
#### § 3933.20 Filing fees.

Each application for assignment or sublease of record title or overriding royalty must include the filing fee found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter. The BLM will not accept any assignment that does not include the filing fee.

[73 FR 69469, Nov. 18, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 55683, Sept. 14, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     Micro-Economics, Inc. March 31, 1998 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894552
<NAME>                        MICRO-ECONOMICS, INC.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998

<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    666
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              (1,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .00



</TABLE>