alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

N OTICE

Appellate case name: In the Interest of A.L.D.L., a Child

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 826

- CV

Trial court case number: 1 4

- FD

- 2183

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County

Proceeding pro se , appellant, P.D., filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s final judgment terminating her parental rights. Appellant also has filed a Docketing Statement indicating that she is indigen t but has not provided a copy of an affidavit of indigence

. Accord ingly, the trial court clerk is directed to prepare, certify, and file with this Court, without advance payment of costs, a clerk’s record on indigence containing the following documents, if any: affidavit(s) of indigence; contest(s) to the affidavit(s) of indigence, the trial court’s signed order(s) extending the time for conducting a hearing on the contest, the trial court’s signed order ruling on the contest(s) to the affidavit(s) of indigence, and any other documents directly related to the question of the appellant’s indigence status. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1, 34.5(c)(1).

The clerk’s record on indigence is due to be filed in th is Court no later than Wednesday, November 25, 2015

. The trial

- court clerk is further directed to immediately prepare, certify, and file with this Court a supplemental clerk’s record containing any documents directly related to the question of the appellant’s indigence status and not already included in the supplemental clerk’s record filed on or before November 25, 2015.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(c)(1).

Because t his appeal involves the termination of the parent

- child relationship, the Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of September 28

, 2015, the date the notice of appeal was filed in this proceeding, so far as reasonably possible. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2, reprinted in Tex. Gov’t. Code Ann., tit. 2, subtit. F app. ( West 2013).

Clerk’s signature:

Date: November 18, 2015
§ 4.828 Use of depositions at hearing. ( a ) Any part or all of a deposition so far as admissible under § 4.835 applied as though the witness were then present and testifying, may be used against any party who was present or represented at the taking of the deposition or who had reasonable notice thereof as follows: ( 1 ) Any deposition may be used for contradiction or impeachment of the deponent as a witness.
( 2 ) The deposition of a party, or of an agent designated to testify on behalf of a party, may be used by an adverse party for any purpose.
( 3 ) The deposition of any witness may be used for any purpose if the party offering the deposition has been unable to procure the attendance of the witness because he is dead; or if the witness is at a greater distance than 100 miles from the place of hearing, or is out of the United States, unless it appears that the absence of the witness was procured by the party offering the deposition; or if the witness is unable to attend or testify because of age, illness, infirmity, or imprisonment; or, upon application and notice, that such exceptional circumstances exist as to make it desirable, in the interest of justice and with due regard to the importance of presenting the testimony of witnesses orally in open hearing, to allow the deposition to be used.
( b ) If only part of a deposition is offered in evidence, the remainder becomes subject to introduction by any party.
( c ) Objection may be made at the hearing to receiving in evidence any deposition or part thereof for any reason which would require the exclusion of the evidence if the witness were then present and testifying.
### §5291. General

#### (a) Requirement

Every person disposing of any substance of the character used in the manufacture of distilled spirits, or disposing of denatured distilled spirits or articles from which distilled spirits may be recovered, shall, when required by the Secretary, render a correct return, in such form and manner as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe, showing the name and address of the person to whom each disposition was made, with such details, as to the quantity so disposed of or other information which the Secretary may require as to each such disposition, as will enable the Secretary to determine whether all taxes due with respect to any distilled spirits manufactured or recovered from any such substance, denatured, distilled spirits, or articles, have been paid. Every person required to render a return under this section shall keep such records as will enable such person to render a correct return. Such records shall be preserved for such period as the Secretary shall by regulations prescribe, and shall be kept available for inspection by any internal revenue officer during business hours.

#### (b) Cross references

**(1) For the definition of distilled spirits, see section 5002(a)(8).**

**(2) For the definition of articles, see section 5002(a)(14).**

**(3) For penalty for violation of subsection (a), see section 5605.**

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1373; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(a)(40), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 286.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior section 5213, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 639, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1979—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 96–39, §807(a)(40)(A), substituted "section 5002(a)(8)" for "section 5002(a)(6)".

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 96–39, §807(a)(40)(B), substituted "section 5002(a)(14)" for "section 5002(a)(11)".

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 810 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1959, see section 210(a)(1) of Pub. L. 85–859, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
#### Lillian A. Burton, Respondent, *v.*W. Burton & Co. and Others, Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 3d day of December, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order entered on the 34th day of December, 1914, .denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

We think that the finding of the jury that there was a delivery of this stock by the defendant Burton to the ■ plaintiff was *939against the weight of evidence. The judgment and order are, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Laughlin and Scott, JJ., dissented and voted for affirmance. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.
### PART I—PROPERTY SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE

Sec.
7301.
Property subject to tax.
7302.
Property used in violation of internal revenue laws.
7303.
Other property subject to forfeiture.
7304.
Penalty for fraudulently claiming drawback.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22863]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1549-DR]


Alabama; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1549-DR), dated September 15, 2004, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 15, 2004:

    Autauga, Baldwin, Bibb, Butler, Chilton, Choctaw, Clarke, 
Coffee, Conecuh, Coosa, Covington, Crenshaw, Dallas, Elmore, 
Escambia, Geneva, Greene, Hale, Jefferson, Lowndes, Marengo, Mobile, 
Monroe, Montgomery, Perry, Pickens, Shelby, Sumter, Talladega, 
Tuscaloosa, Washington, and Wilcox Counties for Public Assistance 
[Categories C through G] (already designated for Public Assistance 
[Categories A and B], including direct Federal assistance, at 100 
percent Federal funding of the total eligible costs for a period of 
up to 72 hours, and Individual Assistance.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-22863 Filed 10-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### § 3861.5 Appointment and employment of mineral surveyors.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

#### Contact Us

Thing to Do

# Hike the Fossil Discovery Trail

Dinosaur National Monument
§ 46.140 Using tiered documents. A NEPA document that tiers to another broader NEPA document in accordance with 40 CFR 1508.28 must include a finding that the conditions and environmental effects described in the broader NEPA document are still valid or address any exceptions. ( a ) Where the impacts of the narrower action are identified and analyzed in the broader NEPA document, no further analysis is necessary, and the previously prepared document can be used for purposes of the pending action.
( b ) To the extent that any relevant analysis in the broader NEPA document is not sufficiently comprehensive or adequate to support further decisions, the tiered NEPA document must explain this and provide any necessary analysis.
( c ) An environmental assessment prepared in support of an individual proposed action can be tiered to a programmatic or other broader-scope environmental impact statement. An environmental assessment may be prepared, and a finding of no significant impact reached, for a proposed action with significant effects, whether direct, indirect, or cumulative, if the environmental assessment is tiered to a broader environmental impact statement which fully analyzed those significant effects. Tiering to the programmatic or broader-scope environmental impact statement would allow the preparation of an environmental assessment and a finding of no significant impact for the individual proposed action, so long as any previously unanalyzed effects are not significant. A finding of no significant impact other than those already disclosed and analyzed in the environmental impact statement to which the environmental assessment is tiered may also be called a “finding of no *new* significant impact.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,793
<SECURITIES>                                     4,550
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,197
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,683
<PP&E>                                          27,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,648
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           644
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,756
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,048
<CGS>                                           23,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,688
<INCOME-TAX>                                       609
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,115
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02



</TABLE>
§ 3483.5 Crediting of production toward diligent development. ( a ) For Federal coal leases issued after August 4, 1976, all production after the effective date of the Federal lease shall be credited toward diligent development.
( b ) For Federal coal leases issued prior to August 4, 1976, all production after the effective date of the first lease readjustment after August 4, 1976, shall be credited toward diligent development.
( c ) For Federal coal leases issued prior to August 4, 1976, that have not been readjusted after August 4, 1976, if the operator/lessee has elected under § 3483.1 of this title to be subject to the diligent development and continued operation requirements of the rules of this part, all production after the effective date of the operator/lessee's election shall be applied toward diligent development.
( d ) For Federal coal leases issued prior to August 4, 1976, that have not been readjusted after August 4, 1976, if the operator/lessee has elected under § 3483.1 of this title to be subject to the diligent development and continued operation requirements of the rules of this part, all production after August 4, 1976, that occurred prior to the effective date of the operator/lessee's election shall be applied toward diligent development if the operator/lessee so requests.
( e ) For Federal coal leases issued prior to August 4, 1976, that have been readjusted after August 4, 1976, all production after August 4, 1976, that occurred prior to the effective date of the first lease readjustment after August 4, 1976, shall be applied toward diligent development if the operator/lessee so requests. Such a request shall comply with the election application provisions at § 3483.1(b)(1) of this title. Any production after such readjustment shall be applied toward diligent development pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
( f ) For Federal coal leases issued prior to August 4, 1976, that are governed by the Federal lease clauses which describe the minimum production requirements until the first lease readjustment after August 4, 1976, no production prior to the effective date of that first Federal lease readjustment shall be applied toward diligent development.
( g ) For LMU's, any production credited under the rules of this part to a Federal lease prior to its inclusion in the LMU shall be applied toward diligent development for the LMU.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdvanced gearbox technologyAn advanced 13,000 HP, counterrotating (CR) gearbox was designed and successfully tested to provide a technology base for future designs of geared propfan propulsion systems for both commercial and military aircraft. The advanced technology CR gearbox was designed for high efficiency, low weight, long life, and improved maintainability. The differential planetary CR gearbox features double helical gears, double row cylindrical roller bearings integral with planet gears, tapered roller prop support bearings, and a flexible ring gear and diaphragm to provide load sharing. A new Allison propfan back-to-back gearbox test facility was constructed. Extensive rotating and stationary instrumentation was used to measure temperature, strain, vibration, deflection and efficiency under representative flight operating conditions. The tests verified smooth, efficient gearbox operation. The highly-instrumented advanced CR gearbox was successfully tested to design speed and power (13,000 HP), and to a 115 percent overspeed condition. Measured CR gearbox efficiency was 99.3 percent at the design point based on heat loss to the oil. Tests demonstrated low vibration characteristics of double helical gearing, proper gear tooth load sharing, low stress levels, and the high load capacity of the prop tapered roller bearings. Applied external prop loads did not significantly affect gearbox temperature, vibration, or stress levels. Gearbox hardware was in excellent condition after the tests with no indication of distress.Document ID19900014958Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsAnderson, N. E.*(General Motors Corp. Indianapolis, IN, United States)*Cedoz, R. W.*(General Motors Corp. Indianapolis, IN, United States)*Salama, E. E.*(General Motors Corp. Indianapolis, IN, United States)*Wagner, D. A.*(General Motors Corp. Indianapolis, IN, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1987Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-179625EDR-12909NAS 1.26:179625Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 23rd Joint Propulsion ConferenceLocation: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: June 1, 1987Accession Number90N24274Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-24341PROJECT: RTOP 535-03-22Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014958.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Skip to global NPS navigation
Skip to this park navigation
Skip to the main content
Skip to this park information section
Skip to the footer section






National Park Service Search Search
This Site
All NPS
 Open
Menu
Close
Menu
Explore This Park
Explore the National Park Service


Exiting nps.gov
  Cancel


Tallgrass Prairie
National Preserve
Kansas


Info
Alerts
Maps
Calendar
Fees


Alerts In Effect Dismiss
 more information on current conditions...
 Dismiss View all alerts


Contact Us
  Maps
 Last updated: January 15, 2021
 Park footer Contact Info Mailing Address: 2480B KS Hwy 177
Strong City,
KS
66869
 Phone: 620 273-8494
x270 Contact Us
 Tools FAQ
Site Index
Español
 Stay Connected


This Site
All NPS 
  National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior
 Accessibility
Privacy Policy
FOIA
Notices
Contact The National Park Service NPS FAQ
No Fear Act
Disclaimer
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
USA.gov Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Instagram
Flickr
§ 4.1049 When will the hearing record close? ( a ) The hearing record will close when the ALJ closes the hearing, unless he or she directs otherwise.
( b ) Except as provided in § 4.1045(b)(1), evidence may not be added after the hearing record is closed, but the transcript may be corrected under § 4.1047(b).
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAND WILLIAMS,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

GREGORY D. TOTTEN, District

Attorney for Ventura County; et al.,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 08-56333

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00381-AHM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

A. Howard Matz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 23, 2010** 

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Former California state pretrial detainee Briand Williams appeals from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

SEP 03 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-56333

Williams contends that his right to a speedy trial was violated in his

underlying state prosecution, and that the underlying prosecution was undertaken

in bad faith or with a retaliatory purpose, such that the general rule of abstention

set forth in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) does not apply. Williams

further argues that the district court did not consider whether the bad faith

exception applied. Contrary to Williams’ contentions, the district court properly

concluded that Williams failed to demonstrate that his prosecution was undertaken

in bad faith, where the record is devoid of any evidence suggesting bad faith or

some other extraordinary circumstance that would make abstention inappropriate. 

See Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v. Garden State Bar Ass’n, 457 U.S. 423, 435

(1982); see also Carden v. Montana, 626 F.2d 82, 84 (9th Cir. 1980) (concluding

that federal intervention is appropriate “[o]nly in cases of proven harassment or

prosecutions undertaken by state officials in bad faith without hope of obtaining a

valid conviction and perhaps in other extraordinary circumstances where

irreparable injury can be shown is federal injunctive relief against pending state

prosecutions appropriate.”).

Totten’s request for judicial notice is granted.

AFFIRMED.