alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.76

 130.44

 130.76

 130.77

 130.46

 130.40

 130.53

 130.39

 130.21

 130.17

 130.15

 130.28

 130.40

 130.22

 130.11

 130.05

 129.91

 129.92

 130.09

 130.21

 130.16

 130.08

 130.11

 130.31

 130.48

 130.45

 130.27

 130.15

 130.17

 130.14

 663

 627

 663

 664

 629

 623

 636

 622

 602

 598

 596

 610

 623

 603

 592

 586

 571

 572

 590

 602

 597

 589

 592

 613

 631

 628

 609

 596

 598

 595

STORAGE

+3

-36

+36

+1

-35

-6

+13

-14

-20

-4

-2

+14

+13

-20

-11

-6

-15

+1

+18

+12

-5

-8

+3

+21

+18

-3

-19

-13

+2

-3

CHANGE

39

46

112

117

95

104

108

102

105

76

66

67

64

53

57

60

55

62

67

66

65

65

65

67

60

53

51

54

62

61

INFLOW

 26

 26

 51

 86

 83

 81

 81

 81

 81

 53

 42

 40

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 37

 36

 36

 36

 36

 36

 36

 36

 36

 36

PUTAH

 11

 38

 43

 30

 30

 26

 20

 28

 34

 25

 25

 20

 19

 25

 25

 25

 25

 23

 20

 22

 31

 33

 27

 20

 15

 19

 25

 25

 25

 27

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .12

 .13

 .08

 .07

 .09

 .11

 .07

 .08

 .02

 .08

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .07

 .10

 .04

 .01

 .12

 .06

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .02

 .04

 .05

 .05

 .06

 .03

 .05

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .35

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .36

 .01

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .75

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .26

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

NOVEMBER 2017 RUN DATE: 12/01/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -65 2,124 761 1,396 0 1.85 1.99

ACRE-FEET -65 4,213 1,509 2,769 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,769

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 1,509

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.99

JULY 1, 2017 2.11

 660

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 2.11
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from 
     MACAW CAPITAL, INC. September 30, 1996 financial  statements and  is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894542
<NAME>                        MACAW CAPITAL, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
- Documents   - Search
  - Alphabetical List
  - New Documents
  - Remediation Documents
  - Characterization and Monitoring Documents 
  - Strategies & Initiatives Documents
  - Vendor Support Documents
  - Regulatory Information Documents
  - Student Papers 

# Superfund Remedy Report, 17th Edition

EPA prepares the Superfund Remedy Report to provide information and analyses on remedies EPA selected to address contamination at Superfund National Priorities List and Superfund Alternative Approach sites. This report is the latest in a series, prepared since 1991, on Superfund remedy selection. The latest edition focuses on the analysis of Superfund remedial actions selected in fiscal years 2018, 2019, and 2020.

The data that forms the basis of the analyses contained in *SRR 17th Edition* can be found at Superfund Data and Reports by downloading *Contaminant of Concern Data for Decision Documents by Media* and *Remedy Component Data for Decision Documents by Media*.

Report with Appendices(2.4MB/66pp/PDF)

## Previous Editions
**16th Edition**

Report with Appendices(3.2MB/85pp/PDF)Fact Sheet(374KB/2pp/PDF)

**15th Edition**

Main Document with Appendices(13.4MB/165pp/PDF)

**14th Edition**

Main Document(1.5MB/44pp/PDF)Appendices C-L(1.6MB/95pp/PDF)

**13th Edition**

Main Document(12MB/36pp/PDF)Appendices(11.4MB/108pp/PDF)

**12th Edition**

Main Document (4.3MB/65pp/PDF)Appendices A, C, F, and G (812KB/23pp/PDF)Appendices B, D, E, and H (6.0MB/199pp/PDF)

**11th Edition**

		Main Document (3.6MB/63pp/PDF)Appendices A, B, and C (2.8MB/85pp/PDF)Appendices D, E, F, and G (3.1MB/80pp/PDF)

**10th Edition**

		Main Document (3.2MB/49pp/PDF)Appendix A (119K/2pp/PDF)Appendix B (309K/50pp/PDF)Appendix C (136K/2pp/PDF)Appendix D (3.7MB/56pp/PDF)Appendix E (132K/4pp/PDF)Appendix F (192K/9pp/PDF)

**9th Edition**

Part 1 (1.6MB/17pp/PDF)Part 2 (5.3MB/26pp/PDF)

**8th Edition**

Full Document (23.8MB/110pp/PDF)

**7th Edition**

Full Document (3.0MB/85pp/PDF)

**6th Edition**

Full Document (5.8MB/192pp/PDF)

**5th Edition**

Full Document (28.4MB/182pp/PDF)

**4th Edition**

Full Document (2.0MB/85pp/PDF)

**3rd Edition**

Full Document (2.5MB/91pp/PDF)

**2nd Edition**

Full Document (1.5MB/62pp/PDF)

**1st Edition**

Full Document (628K/29pp/PDF)
Return to top-  Disclaimer 
-  Site Map 
-  Contact Us 
-  About Us 
-  Privacy Policy 
Share | Contaminated Site Clean-Up InformationContaminated Site Clean-Up Information
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1545-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-1545-DR), dated September 4, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 25, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 4, 2004: 

Manatee, Sarasota, and Suwannee Counties for Individual Assistance (already designated for debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B] under the Public Assistance program and direct Federal assistance, at 100 percent Federal funding of the total eligible costs for the first 72 hours, and Categories C-G under the Public Assistance program.) 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-22074 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-22008-UU

LAZARO FACIO,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

F3 INTERNATIONAL 

RESOURCES, INC., et al.,

Defendant. 

 /

 

DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Default Judgment 

Against Defendants F3 International Resources, Inc. and Lorin M. Jacobson (the “Motion”). D.E. 

16. The Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion in an order entered separately. Pursuant to Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 58(a), the Court now enters this separate final judgment. Accordingly, for good 

cause shown, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff

Lazaro Facio and against Defendants F3 International Resources, Inc. and Lorin M. Jacobson, 

jointly and severally. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a monetary judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff

Lazaro Facio and against Defendants F3 International Resources, Inc. and Lorin M. Jacobson, 

jointly and severally, in the amount of $99,891.00. Post-judgment interest shall accrue pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. For which sum let execution issue.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Miami, Florida, this 31st__ day of August, 2020.

Case 1:20-cv-22008-UU Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2020 Page 1 of 2
__________________________________

URSULA UNGARO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished:

All counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-22008-UU Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2020 Page 2 of 2
NO. 07-06-0395-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	JANUARY 5, 2007

	______________________________

	ROY BRENT CAMPBELL,

				Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

				Appellee

								_________________________________

	FROM THE 181st DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 16,584-B; HON. JOHN B. BOARD, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

	Appellant appeals from his conviction for debit card abuse. The clerk’s and reporter’s records were due on November 27, 2006.  The clerk filed an extension motion on November 28, 2006, stating that appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and a designation of record had not been filed.  The motion was granted to December 15, 2006.  The reporter filed an extension on December 12, 2006, stating she was unaware that this case was on appeal, which was granted to January 12, 2007.  On December 14, 2006, a letter was sent to appellant’s attorney asking for certification that he has complied with the Rules of Appellate Procedure concerning the filing of the appellate record.  To date, no response has been filed by counsel. 

	Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 181st District Court of Randall County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

	1.	whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

	2.	whether appellant is indigent;

			3.	whether appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to his indigency; and

	2.	whether appellant has counsel or is entitled to appointed counsel.

	The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed.  So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record  containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing, if any.  Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental records and reporter’s records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this court on or before February 5, 2007.  Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before February 5, 2007.

	It is so ordered.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 65 (Friday, April 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 18878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07553]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Eureka 
Genomics Corporation of Hercules, California, an exclusive license to 
the Federal Government's rights in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 
13/824,348, ``SCALABLE CHARACTERIZATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS BY PARALLEL 
SEQUENCING'', filed on March 15, 2013.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 5, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The patent rights in this invention are co-
owned by the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary 
of Agriculture, and Eureka Genomics Corporation of Hercules, 
California. The prospective exclusive license will grant to the co-
owner, Eureka Genomics Corporation, an exclusive license to the Federal 
Government's patent rights. It is in the public interest to so license 
this invention as Eureka Genomics Corporation of Hercules, California 
has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The 
prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply 
with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The 
prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) 
days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research 
Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that 
the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-07553 Filed 4-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Terry Louis Spelling, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00215

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 5th District Court of Cass County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CCL

- M

- 08

- 0322 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cou rt

. We note that the appellant, Terry Louis Spelling, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED J UNE 11, 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, William
G. Filer II, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ William G. Filer II
------------------------------------
William G. Filer II
Chief Financial Officer

March 23, 2003

                                       20
(No. 898

Claimant awarded $2,857.80 with interest.)

#### Raye Diamond and Oscar G. Foreman, Trustees of the Last Will and Testament of Harris Wolf, Deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Inheritance *tax*— when *claimant entitled to refund. Sec. 25.*Where certain contingencies named in a will happen and. afterward the estate is re-assessed by reason thereof, in proper proceedings, and the tax reduced, claimant is entitled to a refund of the excess tax paid.

Harry C. Diamond, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimants, Raye Diamond and Oscar G. Foreman, trustee of the last will and testament of Harris Wolf, deceased, bring this suit for the refund of inheritance taxes under Section 25 of the Inheritance Tax Laws of the State of Illinois.

The decedent died testate, September 21, 1911, domiciled in the city of Chicago, in Cook county, Illinois, and claimants were duly appointed and qualified as executors of said estate.

Their inheritance being assessed and entered by the . County Judge of said county, same was paid by executors to the amount of $8459.89.

Certain contingencies named in the will happened later and thereby necessitated a re-assessment, and on proper proceedings in the county court of said county of Cook, the estates were re-assessed, and by reason of such re-assessments the estate became liable to refund to claimants, the sum of $2857.80 with interest at the rate of 3% from 28th day of March, 1914, as shown by certified copy of the record of the proceedings in said court.

There is no contest in behalf of the State, and the Attorney General in his reply admits the correctness of the claim.

The evidence supports the claimant’s claim and it is ordered that claimants be awarded the sum of $2,857.80 with interest thereon at the rate of 3% per annum from 28th day of March, 1914.
<PAGE>
 
                            SCOPUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
               STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                  (Unaudited)
                 (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
                                 Exhibit 11.1
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                       Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended
                                          September 30,         September 30,
                                       ------------------    -----------------
                                         1995      1996        1995     1996
                                       -------   --------    -------   -------
<S>                                    <C>       <C>         <C>       <C> 
Weighted average number of common 
 shares outstanding                      9,178    11,876       9,175    11,706
 
Shares issuable pursuant to stock 
 option plans, less shares assumed
 repurchase at average fair market
 value during the period.                  918       897         782     1,051
 
Shares issuable pursuant to stock
 option plans during the 12 month 
 period prior to the filing of the
 initial public offering price of       
 $12.00 per share                          829                   829       -
                                       -------   -------     -------   -------
 
Number of shares used for computation
 of earnings per share (Primary)        10,925    12,773      10,786    12,757
                                       =======   =======     =======   =======
 
 
Net income                             $   146   $ 1,501     $   227   $ 2,349
                                       =======   =======     =======   =======
 
Net income per share (1)               $  0.01   $  0.12     $  0.02   $  0.18
                                       =======   =======     =======   =======
 
</TABLE>

(1)  There is no difference between primary and fully diluted net income per
share.

                                    Page 23