alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [OR-130-1020-PH; GP4-0082] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below. 

# DATES:

The Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council (EWRAC) will meet on February 25, 2004, at the Spokane District Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1103 North Fancher Road, Spokane, Washington, 99212-1275. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will start at 9 a.m. and adjourn about 4 p.m. Topics on the meeting agenda include: 
    - BLMs Proposed Rule to Revise Federal Grazing Regulations (published in the Federal Register                      on December 8, 2003).                 
    - Environmental Impact Statement on the Proposed Grazing Rule (released January 2, 2004).

The RAC meeting is open to the public, and there will be an opportunity for public comments at 10:30 a.m. Information to be distributed to Council members for their review is requested in written format 10 days prior to the Council meeting date. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra Gourdin or Kathy Helm, Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District Office, 1103 N. Fancher Road, Spokane, Washington, 99212, or call (509) 536-1200. 

      ( print page 5370)    
Dated: January 29, 2004. 

Kevin R. Devitt, 

Acting District Manager. 

[FR Doc. 04-2251 Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Harry L. DANTZLER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-7016.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 23, 2006.

Decided March 1, 2006.

Harry L. Dantzler, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Barton, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*174PER CURIAM:

Harry L. Dantzler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend the complaint, Fed.R.Civ.P. 15. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See United States v. Dantzler,*No. CR-01-831 (D.S.C. June 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which                           ( print page 59604)                        would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, Member Conflict Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         November 17, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         5 p.m. to 8 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Ritz-Carlton Hotel at Pentagon City, 1250 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mark Swieter, PhD., Health Scientist Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Suite 220, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, (301) 435-1389.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards, 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training, 93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 28, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-22311  Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 3910.41 Issuance, modification, relinquishment, and cancellation. ( a ) The BLM may: ( 1 ) Issue an exploration license; or
( 2 ) Reject an application for an exploration license based on, but not limited to: ( i ) The need for resource information;
( ii ) The environmental analysis;
( iii ) The completeness of the application; or
( iv ) Any combination of these factors.
( b ) An exploration license is effective on the date the BLM specifies, which is also the date when exploration activities may begin. An exploration license is valid for a period of up to 2 years after the effective date of the license or as specified in the license.
( c ) The BLM-approved exploration plan will be attached and made a part of each exploration license (see subpart 3931 of part 3930 of this chapter).
( d ) After consultation with the surface management agency, the BLM may approve modification of the exploration license proposed by the licensee in writing if geologic or other conditions warrant. The BLM will not add lands to the license once it has been issued.
( e ) Subject to the continued obligation of the licensee and the surety to comply with the terms and conditions of the exploration license, the exploration plan, and these regulations, a licensee may relinquish an exploration license for any or all of the lands covered by it. A relinquishment must be filed in the BLM state office in which the original application was filed.
( f ) The BLM may terminate an exploration license for noncompliance with its terms and conditions and part 3900, this part, and parts 3920 and 3930 of this chapter.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wrenkard SINCLAIR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40544.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 13, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Larry Chris lies, Rockport, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

After review of the briefs and record in this case we are convinced that the confession at issue is admissible in the light of *Oregon v. Elstad,*470 U.S. 298, 105 S.Ct. 1285, 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985), and *Missouri v. Seibert,*542 U.S. 600, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004), the ultimate holding of which we find in Justice Kennedy’s concurrence.

*920The judgment of the district court is thus

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 23, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00432

- CV

Melissa Goodman , Appellant

v.

Housing Authority of the City of Austin , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFO RE JUSTICES BAKER, KELLY, AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on July 6, 2022 . Having reviewed

the record , the Court holds that Melissa Goodman has not prosecuted her appeal and did not

comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dism isses the appe al for

want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of

costs is made.
Case 1:20-cv-21930-MGC   Document 77   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/09/2022   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-21930-MGC   Document 77   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/09/2022   Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6413

QUINTON LEE COOK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MR. HARLESS; MR. WINGLER; MR. HOLLOWAY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,

District Judge. (CA-96-7-5-MU)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 25, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quinton Lee Cook, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Cook v. Harless, No. CA-96-7-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 1,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
377 P.2d 100

#### Don FLIPPIN, Petitioner, v. Harold A. COX, Warden, New Mexico State Penitentiary, Respondent.

No. 12 HC.

Supreme. Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 2, 1963.

. COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

• Ordered that the request for free process be and the same is hereby granted, and the petition for delayed appeal be and the same is hereby denied for failure to state grounds for a delayed appeal.
Exhibit 10.10


 


Loans Extension Confirmation Letter


 


Reference is made to the loans from Ms. Heung
Mei Tsui to China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), the principal and accumulated interest totaled USD1,480,054 and USD1,354,567
respectively as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. Due to the fact the Company temporarily did not have enough balance in its oversea account
to repay the loans, both Ms. Tsui and the Company agreed to extend the loans to December 31, 2021, by which date the Company shall repay
the principal and accumulated interest.


 


	 	Lender: 	/s/ Heung Mei Tsui


 


	 	Borrower: 	China Pharma Holdings, Inc.


 


	 	By:	/s/ Zhilin Li, President & CEO


 


	 	Date:	 December 31, 2020
Presidential Documents

59539

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 191

Monday, October 4, 2004

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7822 of September 24, 2004

National Hunting and Fishing Day, 2004

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

[Editorial Note: Proclamation 7822, originally published on pages

58249–58250 in the Federal Register of Wednesday, September 29,

2004, is being reprinted with White House corrections.]

America is a land of majestic beauty, and we take pride in our wildlife, 

forests, mountains, lakes, rivers, and coastlines. Outdoor recreation is an 

important part of our Nation’s heritage. On National Hunting and Fishing 

Day, we celebrate the remarkable progress we have made in conserving 

our environment and recognize those who have worked to conserve our 

natural resources. 

America’s hunters and anglers represent the great spirit of our country 

and are among our Nation’s foremost conservationists. These citizens have 

worked to protect habitat and restore fish and wildlife populations. They 

volunteer their time, talents, and energy to countless conservation projects, 

because they recognize the importance of maintaining the natural abundance 

of our country for future generations. 

My Administration is committed to achieving a cleaner, safer, and healthier 

environment for all Americans, including our hunters and anglers. My Administration has expanded opportunities to hunt and fish at national wildlife 

refuges and improved habitat on public and private lands. We have cut 

phosphorus releases into our rivers and streams, and I signed the Healthy 

Forests Restoration Act to help protect our forests from the risk of wildfires. 

Americans are blessed to live amid many wonders of nature, and we have 

a responsibility to be good stewards of the land. I commend all who advance 

conservation and help our citizens enjoy the benefits of our environment. 

These efforts ensure that our national heritage remains a source of pride 

for our citizens, our communities, and our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 25, 2004, 

as National Hunting and Fishing Day. I call upon the people of the United 

States to join me in recognizing the contributions of America’s hunters 

and anglers, and all those who work to conserve our Nation’s fish and 

wildlife resources.

59540 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2004 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth 

day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of 

the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and 

Billing code 3195

Filed 10

[FR Doc. 04

–1–04; 8:45 am] 

–22379

–01–P 

twenty-ninth.

W
#### Bruton & Wade *v.*Beasley.

Beck, J.

The act approved December 16, 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 80), being an act to create a lien in favor of persons hauling stocks, logs, or lumber, creates a lien against property of the kind specified in the act, in favor of any one who hauls stocks, logs, or lumber with teams for another person, although the person claiming the lien may have employed laborers to do the actual physical work incident to the hauling, *413and may himself in person have performed none, or only a portion, of the work.

November 19, 1910.

Foreclosure of lien. Before Judge Mitchell. Colquitt superior court. January *4,*1910.

*J. E. Cook*and *J. D. McKenzie,*for plaintiff in error.

*Davis & Merry,*contra..

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        OF ANDREA M. CORTELLAZZI**

**PURSUANT        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**
**OF        2002**

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: | August                  19, 2008 |
|-------|----------------------------------|

| /s/                  Andrea M.Cortellazzi |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Andrea                  M. Cortellazzi    |   |
| Chief                  Executive Officer  |   |

----
# INFLIGHT SAFETY DO’S AND DON’TS

DO

DON’T  

### Breathe. It is important to relax and be aware.  

### Stay away fr om people, animals, and objects.

Improper operation can cause serious injury or property damage.  

### Be prepared to take manual control of the copter

at any time.  

### Reduce the throttle and switch off the motors if

you have an unexpected landing.  

### Pay attention to undervoltage warnings to

prevent battery damage.

 

### Take risks. Safety is your primary responsibility as

a pilot.  

### Fly over viewers or spectators.  

### Rely 100% on auto-pilot features.  

### Lose visual line of sight with your copter.

Y

ou must be able to see the position and attitude at all times.  

### Fly in blocked airspace. Know your flight zone

befor e taking off.

# PREFLIGHT  

# CHECKLIST

Battery and Power Supplies  Flight pack battery fully charged and all cells balanced  RC transmitter battery shows proper voltage  Auxiliary batteries fully charged and all cells balanced  Copter batteries and power supplies are securely attached


### Transmitter/Reciever  Satellite location and connection is confirmed  Radio transmitter is turned on before connecting the copter battery  Stick trims at center position  All auxiliary switches are in the OFF position  Throttle stick on the transmitter in the down/OFF position



### Environment  There are light to no winds and no precipitation  Current solar data has been accounted for (Note: Solar flares can affect the geomagnetic field and cause erratic behavior with the GPS navigation. Find daily updates here: www.n3kl.org/sun/noaa.html)  Barriers or crowd control in place to pr otect by-standers
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Joseph Love, Inc., Appellant, and Children’s Dress, Infants’ Wear, Housedress and Bathrobe Makers’ Union, Local 91, I. L. G. W. U., Respondent.

Present ■—• Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case Number: 20-21948-CIV-MORENO

ADAM J. RUBINSTEIN, M.D., P.A.; ADAM 

RUBINSTEIN, M.D., FACS, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

SIAMAK S. OURIAN, M.D.; EPIONE 

MEDICAL CORPORATION; EPIONE 

BEVERLY HILLS, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56 and 58, and in accordance with the reasons 

stated in the Court’s Order Granting Summary Judgment on September 10, 2021, judgment is 

entered in favor of the Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants Adam M. Rubinstein, M.D., FACS and Adam 

J. Rubinstein, M.D., P.A. on Defendants/Counterclaimants’ Siamak S. Ourian M.D., et al., 

defamation by implication claim and against Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants Adam M. Rubinstein, 

M.D., FACS and Adam J. Rubinstein, M.D., P.A. on all of their claims.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 10th of September 21.

______________________________________

FEDERICO A. MORENO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-21948-FAM Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2021 Page 1 of 1
[Cite as State v. Craft, 2019-Ohio-2079.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, 

 Appellee, 

 - vs - 

PAUL DILLON CRAFT, 

 Appellant. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

CASE NO. CA2018-09-187 

D E C I S I O N 

5/28/2019 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CR2018-02-0201 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Michael Greer, Government 

Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellee 

Scott N. Blauvelt, 315 South Monument Avenue, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Paul Dillon Craft, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of 

proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon 

a brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of 
Butler CA2018-09-187 

 - 2 - 

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous. 

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur. 
[Cite as State v. Craft, 2019-Ohio-2079.]