41948 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 138 / Friday, July 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD80–55A070, 

Revision 1, dated December 17, 2013. 

Thereafter, repeat the ETHF inspection at the 

applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., 

‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin MD80–55A070, Revision 1, dated 

December 17, 2013. If any cracking is found 

during any inspection, before further flight, 

do all applicable corrective actions, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

MD80–55A070, Revision 1, dated December 

17, 2013. 

(i) Exception to the Service Information 

Specifications 

Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

MD80–55A070, Revision 1, dated December 

17, 2013, specifies a compliance time ‘‘after 

the original issue date of this service 

bulletin,’’ this AD requires compliance 

within the specified compliance time after 

the effective date of this AD. 

(j) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for the 

actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, 

if those actions were performed before the 

effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin MD80–55A070, dated May 

22, 2013, which is not incorporated by 

reference in this AD. 

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles 

ACO to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and 14 

CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(l) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact George Garrido, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los 

Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 

Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712– 

4137; phone: 562–627–5357; fax: 562–627– 

5210; email: george.garrido@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC 

D800–0019, Long Beach, CA 90846–0001; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 2; fax 

206–766–5683; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com.You may review 

copies of the referenced service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 11, 

2014. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–16940 Filed 7–17–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0400; FRL–9913–80– 

Region–7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Missouri, Auto Exhaust Emission 

Controls 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to take direct 

final action to approve the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the state of Missouri on 

January 14, 2014, for the purpose of 

removing an outdated rule. This action 

amends the SIP to remove a rule that 

was originally approved in 1972 but has 

now been rescinded. This rule refers to 

exhaust emission control components 

that are no longer manufactured. 

Vehicle manufacturers now produce 

newer technology in exhaust emissions 

equipment in order to meet more 

stringent Federal motor vehicle 

standards. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed 

action must be received in writing by 

August 18, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2014–0400, by mail to Paula 

Higbee, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. Comments may 

also be submitted electronically or 

through hand delivery/courier by 

following the detailed instructions in 

the ADDRESSES section of the direct final 

rule located in the rules section of this 

Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Paula Higbee, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913–551–7028, 

or by email at higbee.paula@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of the Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the state’s 

SIP revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

revision amendment and anticipates no 

relevant adverse comments to this 

action. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this action, 

no further activity is contemplated in 

relation to this action. If EPA receives 

relevant adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this action. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this action should do so 

at this time. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on part of 

this rule and if that part can be severed 

from the remainder of the rule, EPA may 

adopt as final those parts of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

Dated: July 1, 2014. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

[FR Doc. 2014–16701 Filed 7–17–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0764; FRL–9913–93– 

Region 6] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; New 

Mexico; Grant County Sulfur Dioxide 

Limited Maintenance Plan 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

limited maintenance plan submitted by 

the State of New Mexico, dated 

November 1, 2013, for the Grant County 

maintenance area for the 1971 sulfur 

dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS). New 

Mexico submitted this limited 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS