alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 2:20-CV-14150-RLR

WALTER KROLL, on his behalf and

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

v.

KVZ GOLF, LLC, a Florida Limited

Liability Company, d/b/a Palm Cove

Golf and Yacht Club,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAYING CASE

This cause is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Settlement Conference. [DE 

25]. In the Joint Motion, Defendant has also requested that this case be stayed through the date of 

the parties’ settlement conference, assuming the Court grants the Joint Motion. [DE 25 at 1]. The 

Joint Motion indicates that Plaintiff opposes staying the case. [DE 25 ¶ 6].

The Court commends the parties for their willingness to voluntarily request and participate 

in settlement discussions before a Magistrate Judge. Doing so is particularly prudent given their

position that “a magistrate[-]supervised settlement conference will be the most effective method of 

imparting upon [the parties] the economic and legal realities of this lawsuit—thereby facilitating

potential settlement—before they become further immersed in costly and time-consuming 

litigation.” [DE 25 ¶ 3]. The Court agrees that attempting to achieve mutual resolution before 

incurring more significant costs is appropriate, especially since the parties consider this to be “a 

straight-forward and uncomplicated FLSA and FMWA case.” [DE 25 ¶ 2].

Case 2:20-cv-14150-SMM Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2020 Page 1 of 2
Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The parties’ Joint Motion for Settlement Conference, DE 25, is GRANTED, and this

case is referred to Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart for a settlement conference. By 

December 4, 2020, the parties shall participate in a settlement conference before 

Magistrate Judge Reinhart. Within one day of the settlement conference, the parties shall 

file a joint notice with the Court regarding the outcome of the conference.

2. All pretrial deadlines in this case are STAYED.

3. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE THIS 

CASE, which shall remain closed until further notice of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Pierce, Florida, this 26th day of October, 2020.

_______________________________ 

ROBIN L. ROSENBERG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to Counsel of Record

Case 2:20-cv-14150-SMM Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2020 Page 2 of 2
Please . . . Buy firewood where you camp!

Firewood carries insects and 

disease that kill trees.

Don’t Destroy the Things You Love

Moving firewood can spread 

insects and diseases thatkill trees.

Program Aid No. 1887 • Issued August 2006

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

100,000,000 elms killed by 

Dutch elm disease

30,000 hardwoods already 

destroyed to control the 

Asian longhorned beetle

20,000,000 ash killed by the 

emerald ash borer

United States Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

http://www.aphis.usda.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case Number: 20-22050-CIV-MORENO

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL, S.A., SISVEL, 

S.p.A., 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BLU PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER DIRECTING REASSIGNMENT OF THE CASE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record. The Court 

was assigned this matter in the ordinary course of random assignment of cases.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 371, on July 17, 2020, the undersigned retired from regular 

active service and took senior status. As 28 U.S.C. § 294(b) allows a sitting senior judge to 

perform such judicial duties as he or she is willing and able to undertake, the undersigned refers 

this case back to the Clerk of Court for reassignment to another judge in accordance with the 

blind assignment system to the calendar of an active judge.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 30th of September 2020.

FEDERICO A. MORENO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-22050-DPG Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2020 Page 1 of 1
§ 4.602 What definitions apply to this subpart? As used in this subpart: *Act* means section 203(a)(1) of the Equal Access to Justice Act, Public Law 96-481, 5 U.S.C. 504, as amended.
*Adjudicative officer* means the deciding official(s) who presided at the adversary adjudication, or any successor official(s) assigned to decide the application.
*Adversary adjudication* means any of the following: ( 1 ) An adjudication under 5 U.S.C. 554 in which the position of the Department or other agency is presented by an attorney or other representative who enters an appearance and participates in the proceeding;
( 2 ) Any hearing conducted under section 6103(a) of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 *et seq.*); or
( 3 ) Any hearing or appeal involving the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb *et seq.*).
*Affiliate* means: ( 1 ) Any individual, corporation, or other entity that directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares or other interest of the applicant; or
( 2 ) Any corporation or other entity of which the applicant directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other interest.
*Demand* means the express demand of the Department or other agency that led to the adversary adjudication, but does not include a recitation by the Department or other agency of the maximum statutory penalty: ( 1 ) In the administrative complaint; or
( 2 ) Elsewhere when accompanied by an express demand for a lesser amount.
*Department* means the Department of the Interior or the component of the Department that is a party to the adversary adjudication (e.g., Bureau of Land Management).
*Final disposition* means the date on which either of the following becomes final and unappealable, both within the Department and to the courts: ( 1 ) A decision or order disposing of the merits of the proceeding; or
( 2 ) Any other complete resolution of the proceeding, such as a settlement or voluntary dismissal.
*Other agency* means any agency of the United States or the component of the agency that is a party to the adversary adjudication before the Office of Hearings and Appeals, other than the Department of the Interior and its components.
*Party* means a party as defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3).
*Position of the Department or other agency* means: ( 1 ) The position taken by the Department or other agency in the adversary adjudication; and
( 2 ) The action or failure to act by the Department or other agency upon which the adversary adjudication is based.
*Proceeding* means an adversary adjudication as defined in this section.
*You* means a party to an adversary adjudication.
[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 88 FR 5794, Jan. 30, 2023]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cooper Industries, Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry A. Klebe,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sections 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sections 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Terry A. Klebe
---------------------------
Terry A. Klebe
Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer

February 18, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1558-DR]


West Virginia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of West Virginia (FEMA-1558-DR), dated September 20, 2004, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 27, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective September 27, 2004.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-22319 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-61066-RAR

NINA TSCHAPEK, 

Plaintiff,

v.

KEYSTONE BUILDERS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and 

to Dismiss Complaint [ECF No. 18] (“First Motion”), Defendants’ Second Motion to Compel

Arbitration and to Dismiss Complaint [ECF No. 32] (“Second Motion”), and Defendants’ 

Amended Second Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [ECF 

No. 37] (“Amended Motion”). These matters were referred to the Honorable Jared M. Strauss, 

United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation (“Report”). The Court has 

carefully reviewed Magistrate Judge Strauss’s Reports [ECF Nos. 34, 38] as well as the entire 

record. As of the date of this Order, no party has filed any objection to the Reports, and the time 

to do so pursuant to Local Magistrate Rule 4(b) has elapsed. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: (1) the Reports [ECF Nos. 34, 38] are hereby 

AFFIRMED and ADOPTED; (2) the First Motion [ECF No. 18] is DENIED as moot; and (3) 

the Second Motion [ECF No. 32] and the Amended Motion [ECF No. 37] are DENIED without 

prejudice pending a jury trial on the limited issue of whether Plaintiff signed the alleged arbitration 

agreement.

Case 0:20-cv-61066-RAR Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 6th day of November, 2020.

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 0:20-cv-61066-RAR Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020 Page 2 of 2
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 0:20-cv-61113-DIMITROULEAS

CODY BARNETT, et al., 

Plaintiff,

v.

GREGORY TONY, 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER DENYING MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice, filed 

April 20, 2022 [DE 175] (the “Motion”). In the Motion, Defendant requests the Court take 

judicial notice of two adjudicative facts pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 201. The Court has considered 

the Motion and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [DE 175] is hereby 

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to file a motion that complies with the requirements of 

S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1.A.3., which requires the moving party to certify that he has conferred, or 

describes a reasonable effort to confer, with the parties affected in a good faith effort to resolve 

the dispute.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 20th day of April, 2022.

Case 0:20-cv-61113-WPD Document 176 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/21/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61113-WPD Document 176 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/21/2022 Page 2 of 2
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE01826

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of EasyLink Services International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Stallings, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Thomas J. StallingsThomas J. StallingsChief Executive OfficerMarch 15, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4960 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4960

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for 
   operation of a Department of Veterans Affairs regional office in 
    Manila, the Republic of the Philippines, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 2022

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for 
   operation of a Department of Veterans Affairs regional office in 
    Manila, the Republic of the Philippines, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping Our Commitment to Overseas 
Veterans Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR OPERATION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS REGIONAL OFFICE IN MANILA, THE REPUBLIC OF THE 
              PHILIPPINES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

    Section 315(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``September 30, 2022'' and inserting ``September 30, 2023''.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsObservations on computational methodologies for use in large-scale, gradient-based, multidisciplinary design incorporating advanced CFD codesHow a combination of various computational methodologies could reduce the enormous computational costs envisioned in using advanced CFD codes in gradient based optimized multidisciplinary design (MdD) procedures is briefly outlined. Implications of these MdD requirements upon advanced CFD codes are somewhat different than those imposed by a single discipline design. A means for satisfying these MdD requirements for gradient information is presented which appear to permit: (1) some leeway in the CFD solution algorithms which can be used; (2) an extension to 3-D problems; and (3) straightforward use of other computational methodologies. Many of these observations have previously been discussed as possibilities for doing parts of the problem more efficiently; the contribution here is observing how they fit together in a mutually beneficial way.Document ID19920015713Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNewman, P. A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Hou, G. J.-W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Jones, H. E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Taylor, A. C., III*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Korivi, V. M.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1992Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-104206NAS 1.15:104206AVSCOM-TR-92-B-007Accession Number92N24956Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-59-53-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920015713.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the annual report of Alberta Star Development
Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gordon Steblin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)         The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



| | /s/ Gordon Steblin                         | 
| | ------------------------------------------ | 
| | Gordon Steblin                             | 
| | Chief Financial Officer                    | 
| | Principal Accounting and Financial Officer | 
| | March 31, 2014                             | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being
filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
### §526. Shipowners' protection and indemnity associations

There shall not be included in gross income the receipts of shipowners' mutual protection and indemnity associations not organized for profit, and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder; but such corporations shall be subject as other persons to the tax on their taxable income from interest, dividends, and rents.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 178.)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00079

- CV

The BLANCO NATIONAL BANK , Its Successors, Assigns, and Predecessors in Interest, Appellant

v.

Michael R. GONZALEZ

, Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 09327 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED that Michael R. Gonzalez take nothing from The Blanco National Bank, Its Successors, Assigns, and Predecessors in Interest. It is ORDERED that The Blanco National Bank, Its Successors, Assig ns, and Predecessors in Interest recover its costs of this appeal from appellee Michael R. Gonzalez.

SIGNED April 24, 2013.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2020 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-70532, 333-88766, 333-106003, 333-114919, 333-121217, 333-123392, 333-140999,
333-149324, 333-155261, and 333-157599) of United Online, Inc. of our report dated February 23, 2010 relating to the financial statements, financial
statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los
Angeles, California
February 23, 2010

---



QuickLinks