alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE WHITE HOUSE

WASHINGTON

August 2, 1979

MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF

DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

In my Environmental Message of August 2, 1979, I

recognized the important natural, historic, and recreational

values of our Nation's river corridors. It is important for

the federal agencies to set an example of sound management

for state, local, and private landowners by taking an 

aggressive role in protecting Wild and Scenic Rivers which

flow through public lands.

In addition, I recognized that the 1968 National Trails

System Act is designed to promote the development of recreational, scenic, and historic trails for persons of diverse

interests and abilities — including the young, the handicapped, and the aged — and that the National Trails System

is in its fledgling stage. The Act provides for designating

trails on state, local and private lands, but only 130

trails have been established since enactment of the Act. In

my Environmental Message I stressed the importance of expanding the National Trails System.

Therefore, I am directing that each of you take the

following actions:

° Each federal agency shall encourage states,

localities and private land holders to designate

trails on their lands and to participate with

federal agencies and trail users in designing and

creating an overall National Trails System which

will provide more fully for the trail needs of

America.

0 Each federal agency shall, as part of its normal

planning and environmental review processes, take

care to avoid or mitigate adverse effects on 

rivers identified in the Nationwide Inventory,

prepared by the Heritage Conservation and Recreation

Service in the Department of the Interior. Agencies
-2-

shall, as part of their normal environmental

review process, consult with the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service prior to taking actions

which could effectively foreclose wild, scenic, or 

recreational river status on rivers in the Inventory.

° Each Federal agency with responsibility for

administering public lands shall, as part of its

ongoing land use planning and management activities

and environmental review processes, make an assessment of whether the rivers identified in the

Nationwide Inventory and which are on their lands

are suitable for inclusion in the Wild and Scenic

Rivers System. If an agency determines that a

river would be suitable for inclusion in the

System, the agency shall, to the extent of the

agency's authority, promptly take such steps as

are needed to protect and manage the river and the

surrounding area in a fashion comparable to rivers

already included in the Wild and Scenic Rivers

System. In addition, the agency is encouraged,

pursuant to the revised Guidelines, to work with

the Agriculture and Interior Departments to

prepare legislation to designate the river as part

of the Wild and Scenic Rivers System if appropriate.

Please give these assignments your immediate attention.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 59165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22253]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[FRL-7823-7]


Nebraska: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
Program Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Nebraska has applied to the EPA for final authorization of the 
changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation 
and Recovery Act. The EPA proposes to grant final authorization to 
Nebraska. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal 
Register, the EPA is authorizing the changes by an immediate final 
rule. The EPA did not make a proposal prior to the immediate final rule 
because we believe this action is not controversial and do not expect 
comments that oppose it. We have explained the reasons for this 
authorization in the preamble to the immediate final rule. Unless we 
receive written comments which oppose this authorization during the 
comment period, the immediate final rule will become effective on the 
date it establishes, and we will not take further action on this 
proposal. If we receive comments that oppose this action, we will 
withdraw the immediate final rule and it will not take effect. We will 
then respond to public comments in a later final rule based on this 
proposal. You may not have another opportunity for comment. If you want 
to comment on this action, you must do so at this time.

DATES: Send your written comments by November 3, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Lisa Haugen, Environmental 
Protection Agency, ARTD/RESP, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 
66101. Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand 
delivery/courier; please follow the detailed instructions in the 
ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule which is located in the 
rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa V. Haugen at the above address, 
by phone at (913) 551-7877, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3159504456545f1f5d584250715441501f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cba3aabeacaea5e5a7a2b8aa8baebbaae5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
immediate final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section 
of this Federal Register.

    Dated: September 2, 2004.
William Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 04-22253 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
      32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I,
      Thomas
      Calabro, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Latin American Telecommunications Venture Company-LATVCO on Form 10-QSB for
      the
      quarterly period ended May 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of Latin American
      Telecommunications Venture Company-LATVCO.





By:
      /s/
      Thomas Calabro


Name:
      Thomas Calabro


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer





July
      17,
      2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in the typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Latin American Telecommunications Venture
      Company - LATVCO and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BOARD: BOARD: Allen Amsler Chairman R. Kenyon Wells MarkS. Lutz Vice Chairman Catherine B. Templeton, Director Promoting and protecting the health of thepublicandthe environment December 28, 2012 Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Sam Nunn Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 Re: Revision to SCAirQualityImplementation Plan: Regional Haze Periodic Update Dear Ms. Fleming: L. Clarence Batts, Jr. Ann B. Kirol, DDS John 0. Hutto, Sr., MD

The South Carolina Department ofHealth and Environmental Control (Department) requests thatthe U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) grant final approval to this revision ofthe South CarolinaAir Quality Implementation Plan (SIP) to address the requirements ofRegional Haze Rule at 40 CFR 51.308(g) requiring periodic reports evaluating progress towards the State's Reasonable Progress Goals. The Department offered a public hearing for this revision on December 3, 2012. However, pursuant to 40 CFR 51.102 (20 11), the Department did not receive a request for a hearing by the close ofthe comment period (November 26, 2012). Therefore, the Department cancelled the hearing. On November 26,2012, the Department received comments from Region 4 staffand has incorporated revisions to address those comments in this final revision. The Department will publish a final notice to revise the aforementioned portion ofthe SIP in the South Carolina State Register on January 25, 2013, at which time it will become state effective. I certifY thatthe digital copies ofthis letter and the attached documents on the enclosed CD are an exact duplicate ofthe paper copies. Itis for the reasons outlined in the attachments that DHEC submits a negative declaration to the EPA specifYing that its Regional Haze SIP is sufficient in meeting the requirements outlined in the Regional Haze Rule. Furthermore, no additional controls are necessary during this, the five year progress report. The Department appreciates the assistance provided byyou and your staffregarding the formulation of this plan. Should you oryour staffhave any questions or comments concerning this SIP revision, please contactMaeve S.R. Mason ofthe Bureau ofAir Quality at (803) 898-2230 ormasonmr@dhec.sc.gov. 

# SincYkp**Q.~** Myra C. Reece, Chief Bureau ofAir Quality SCDHEC SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 2600Bu11Street • Columbia,SC29201• Phone:(803)898-3432 • www.scdhec.govMs. Fleming December28, 2012 Page 2 of2

ec: Scott R. Davis, Chief, AirPlanning Branch, EPA Region 4 Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory Development Section, EPA Region 4 Richard Wong, Regulatory Development Section, EPA Region 4 Rhonda Banks-Thompson, Assistant Bureau Chief, BAQ, SCDHEC Robert Brown, Director, Division ofAirAssessment, Innovations, and Regulation, BAQ, SCDHEC Appendices and CD enclosure: 1. Text ofFinal SIP Revision 2. Appendix A: Back Trajectory Analysis ofBetaExtinction 3. AppendixB: Point Source S02 Emissions Reductions 4. Appendix C: Notice ofGeneral Public Interest 5. Appendix D: Written Comment and Department Response 6. Appendix E: Copy ofLegal Authority
### §953. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 86–339, §3, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 602; Pub. L. 105–308, §4(a), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2934, which related to determination of value of unallotted and allotted lands and equalization of value of allotments and designated certain lands not subject to allotment as tribal reserves, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**EXHIBIT 3.1**

**AMENDMENTS TO BYLAWS**

**Article I,Section 2 of Internet Commerce Corporation’s Bylaws is amended to read asfollows:**

SECTION  2.    *Annual Meeting.*Annual meetingsof stockholders shall be held, from time to time, at such time fixed by thedirectors. If such day is a legal holiday, then the meeting shall be held onthe next following business day. At each annual meeting, the stockholders shallelect by a plurality vote the directors and shall transact such other businessas may be properly brought before the meeting.

**Article II,Sections 1 and 2 of Internet Commerce Corporation’s Bylaws are amended toread as follows:**

SECTION  1.    *Number, Election and Term of Directors.*Thetotal number of directors constituting the entire Board of Directors shallconsist of not fewer than one nor more than ten members; provided, however,that such number may from time to time be increased or decreased by the Boardof Directors or by the stockholders. At each annual meeting of stockholders,all directors shall be elected for a term expiring at the next succeedingannual meeting of stockholders. Each director shall serve until his or hersuccessor has been duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlierdisqualification, death, resignation or removal. No decrease in the number ofdirectors constituting the board of directors shall shorten the term of anyincumbent director.

SECTION  2.    *Vacancies.*Whenever any vacancyshall occur in the Board of Directors by reason of death, resignation, removal,increase in the number of directors or otherwise, it may be filled by amajority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by asole remaining director, and the directors so chosen shall hold office untilthe next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are dulyelected and qualified, unless sooner displaced. If there are no directors inoffice, then an election of directors may be held in the manner provided bystatute.

 

----
# Europos Sąjungos C 270I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 270I |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 63 metai2020m. rugpjūčio 17d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 270I

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

63 metai2020m. rugpjūčio 17d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Pranešimai |
| | EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI |
| | Europos Komisija |
| 2020/C 270 I/01 | Komisijos pareiškimas dėl Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvos (ES) 2019/1937 dėl asmenų, pranešančių apie Sąjungos teisės pažeidimus, apsaugos | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

IV   Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Europos Komisija

2020/C 270 I/01

Komisijos pareiškimas dėl Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvos (ES) 2019/1937 dėl asmenų, pranešančių apie Sąjungos teisės pažeidimus, apsaugos

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

IV Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Europos Komisija

| 17.8.2020 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CI 270/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CI 270/1

---

Komisijos pareiškimas dėl Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvos (ES) 2019/1937 dėl asmenų, pranešančių apie Sąjungos teisės pažeidimus, apsaugos

(2020/C 270 I/01)

Atlikdama 2019 m. spalio 23 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvos (ES) 2019/1937 dėl asmenų, pranešančių apie Sąjungos teisės pažeidimus, apsaugos (1) 27 straipsnyje numatytą peržiūrą, Komisija, kai tinkama, pagal SESV 154 straipsnį pasikonsultavusi su socialiniais partneriais, apsvarstys galimybę pateikti pasiūlymą išplėsti jos taikymo sritį tam tikriems SESV 153 ir 157 straipsniais grindžiamiems aktams.

---

(1)  OL L 305, 2019 11 26, p. 17.

---
Case 1:20-cv-22166-WPD Document 73-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-22166-WPD Document 73-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-22166-WPD Document 73-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-22166-WPD Document 73-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-22166-WPD Document 73-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-22166-WPD Document 73-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-22166-WPD Document 73-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-22166-WPD Document 73-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-22166-WPD Document 73-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-22166-WPD Document 73-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-22166-WPD Document 73-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021 Page 11 of 11
No. 96-2384

United States of America, *
* Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Gary Apker, * [PUBLISHED]
* Appellant. *

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Filed: December 6, 1996

Before McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
A certificate of appealability is not available to the petitioner in this case because petitioner is not asserting the denial of a constitutional right. See Hohn v. United States , No. 96-3118, 1996 WL 633268 (8th Cir. Nov. 4, 1996) (per curiam ). We are therefore obligated to deny the certificate.

HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring in the result.

I join in the decision of the panel to deny Apker's request for a certificate of appealability because I believe we are obliged to do so under Hohn v. United States , No. 96-3118 (8th Cir., Nov. 4, 1996), which represents the law of this circuit. I disagree, however, with the reasoning of the Hohn decision and therefore concur only in the result. Because of the importance of the issue-2- raised by both Hohn and Apker, the court may wish to take one of these cases for en banc review.

There are at least two reasons why Apker's claim that he was convicted and sentenced in violation of the Supreme Court's decision in Bailey v. United States , 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), should be considered on the merits. First, it is doubtful Congress intended in its 1996 habeas revisions to bar appeals of claims that a conviction violates federal law. 18 U.S.C. § 2255 states that inmates may challenge their confinement on grounds that it violates either "the Constitution or laws of the United States." Thus, to me it makes little sense to limit appeals from denials of habeas relief to violations of the Constitution only and to hold that claims resting on interpretation of federal law are not appealable.

Second, even if Congress did intend to so limit appeals from denials of Section 2255 relief, Apker's appeal states a constitutional claim. For the reasons set forth in the dissent by Judge McMillian in Hohn , the unlawful application of the federal statute here -- convicting and punishing Apker for conduct which does not fall within the terms of the weapons statute as construed by the Supreme Court in Bailey -- denies Apker due process of law. Apker should be allowed to raise this issue on appeal.

For the stated reasons I respectfully concur in the result.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,766,854               2,700,298
<SECURITIES>                                 6,628,794               4,950,769
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,762                  36,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,027,120               2,354,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,401,704              11,165,185
<PP&E>                                         733,791                 668,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,411,012              12,023,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,235,802               2,449,010
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         5,727                   5,620
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,080,213               9,476,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,411,012              12,023,903
<SALES>                                      6,092,369               3,681,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,092,369               3,681,011
<CGS>                                        3,845,093               2,647,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,834,868               1,082,571
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (25,687)                (57,182)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                436,095                   7,902
<INCOME-TAX>                                   155,062                   2,845
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   281,033                   5,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05                     .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>