alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6344. Cross references

#### (a) Length of period

**For period within which levy may be begun in case of—**

**(1) Income, estate, and gift taxes, and taxes imposed by chapter 41, 42, 43, or 44, see sections 6502(a) and 6503(a)(1).**

**(2) Employment and miscellaneous excise taxes, see section 6502(a).**

#### (b) Delinquent collection officers

**For distraint proceedings against delinquent internal revenue officers, see section 7804(c).**

#### (c) Other references

**For provisions relating to—**

**(1) Stamps, marks and brands, see section 6807.**

**(2) Administration of real estate acquired by the United States, see section 7506.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 789; Pub. L. 91–172, title I, §101(j)(45), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 531; Pub. L. 93–406, title II, §1016(a)(13), Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 930; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIII, §1307(d)(2)(F)(v), title XVI, §1605(b)(8), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1728, 1755; Pub. L. 96–223, title I, §101(f)(1)(I), Apr. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 252; Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1941(b)(2)(B)(ix), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1323; Pub. L. 105–206, title I, §1104(b)(1), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 710.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–206 substituted "section 7804(c)" for "section 7803(d)".

1988—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "or 44" for "44, or 45".

1980—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 96–223 inserted reference to chapter 45.

1976—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 94–455 inserted reference to chapters 41 and 44.

1974—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 93–406 inserted reference to chapter 43.

1969—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 91–172 inserted reference to chapter 42.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–418 applicable to crude oil removed from the premises on or after Aug. 23, 1988, see section 1941(c) of Pub. L. 100–418, set out as a note under section 164 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–223 applicable to periods after Feb. 29, 1980, see section 101(i) of Pub. L. 96–223, set out as a note under section 6161 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by section 1307(d)(2)(F)(v) of Pub. L. 94–455 effective on and after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1307(e) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 501 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1974 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–406 applicable, except as otherwise provided in section 1017(c) through (i) of Pub. L. 93–406, for plan years beginning after Sept. 2, 1974, but, in the case of plans in existence on Jan. 1, 1974, amendment by Pub. L. 93–406 applicable for plan years beginning after Dec. 31, 1975, see section 1017 of Pub. L. 93–406, set out as an Effective Date; Transitional Rules note under section 410 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1969 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–172 effective Jan. 1, 1970, see section 101(k)(1) of Pub. L. 91–172, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4940 of this title.
§ 404.10 Are there certain types of infrastructure and facilities that may not be included in a rural water supply project? Yes. A rural water supply project may not include: ( a ) Any infrastructure or facilities that would deliver water for commercial irrigation; and
( b ) The construction of major impoundment structures.
----

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2005/C 256/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Date of adoption of the decision: 

Member State: France

Aid No: N 429/2004

Title: Scheme on innovation aid to shipbuilding/grant

Objective: Innovation

Legal basis: Loi de finance annuelle — budget industrie

Budget: EUR 25 000 000 per annum

Aid intensity or amount: Max 20 %

Duration: 6 years

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

Date of adoption of the decision: 

Member State: France

Aid No: N 54/2005

Title: French international information channel

Objective: Financing of the creation and operation of the French international information channel

Budget: EUR 30 million for 2005, EUR 70 million for 2006 to 2009

Aid intensity or amount: 100 %

Duration: Until 2009 inclusive

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-3190-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency for the State of Maine (FEMA-3190-EM), dated January 15, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 26, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Maine is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of January 15, 2004:

Androscoggin and Washington Counties for emergency protective measures (Category B) under the Public Assistance program for a period of 48 hours. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster Assistance.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response,  Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-2257 Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
§ 4.1305 Amendment of petition. ( a ) An individual filing a petition may amend it once as a matter of right before receipt by the individual of an answer, motion, or statement of OSM made in accordance with § 4.1304 of this part. Thereafter, a motion for leave to amend the petition shall be filed with the administrative law judge.
( b ) OSM shall have 30 days from receipt of a petition amended as a matter of right to file an answer, motion, or statement in accordance with § 4.1304 of this part. If the administrative law judge grants a motion to amend a petition, the time for OSM to file an answer, motion, or statement shall be set forth in the order granting the motion to amend.
STATE OF TE NNESSEE

DEPARTMENT O F ENVI RONM ENT AND CONSERVATION

WATER SUPPL Y

9th Floor, 4 01 C hurch Street

Nashville, Tennessee 37243-154 9



### ANNUAL DISPOSAL/INJECTION WELL M O NIT O RING REPORT

Nam e an d Address o f Facility Nam e an d Address o f Own er/ O p e rator

S t a t e C o un t y Perm i t Nu m b e r

WE LL ACT I VI T Y TYPE OF PERM I T LOCAT I ON

___ Br ine Disposal

___ I ndividual L a titude

___ E nhanced Recover y

___ Ar ea

___ Hy dr ocar bon Stor age

___ Nu m b er of Wells

L o n g i t u d e

Lease N a m e Well u m b e r

INJECT ION PRE SSURE TOTA L VOL UM E INJ E CT ED

Mo n t h Yea r Av erag e PS IG Max i m u m PS IG BBL MCF Min i m u m PSI G Max i m u m PS IG



### Certifica t i o n

I cert i f y un de r t h e penal t y of l a w t h at I ha ve exam i n ed and am fa m i l i ar with th e in fo rmatio n su b m it ted in th is do cu m e n t an d all

at t achm e nt s and t h at

, based o n m y i nqui ry o f t h ose i n di vi d u al s i m m e di at el y resp on si bl e fo r obt ai ni n g t h e i n f o rm at i on, I bel i e ve th at

th e inform atio n is tru e , accurate, an d co m p lete. I am aware th at th ere are si gn ifican t p e n a lties for su b m ittin g false in fo rm at ion

, in clu d i n g th e po ssib ility o f fine or im p r iso n m en t.

Nam e and Offi ci al Tit l e (ple as e t y pe or p r int) Signature Date Sign ed TUBIN G —CAS I NG AN NUL US

PRESSURE (O PT IONA L

MON I TOR I NG )



### C N

- p e n d i n g R D A p e n d i n g
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDynamic analysis of space-related linear and non-linear structuresIn order to be cost effective, space structures must be extremely light weight, and subsequently, very flexible structures. The power system for Space Station Freedom is such a structure. Each array consists of a deployable truss mast and a split blanket of photovoltaic solar collectors. The solar arrays are deployed in orbit, and the blanket is stretched into position as the mast is extended. Geometric stiffness due to the preload make this an interesting non-linear problem. The space station will be subjected to various dynamic loads, during shuttle docking, solar tracking, attitude adjustment, etc. Accurate prediction of the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the space station components, including the solar arrays, is critical for determining the structural adequacy of the components, and for designing a dynamic controls system. The process used in developing and verifying the finite element dynamic model of the photo-voltaic arrays is documented. Various problems were identified, such as grounding effects due to geometric stiffness, large displacement effects, and pseudo-stiffness (grounding) due to lack of required rigid body modes. Analysis techniques, such as development of rigorous solutions using continuum mechanics, finite element solution sequence altering, equivalent systems using a curvature basis, Craig-Bampton superelement approach, and modal ordering schemes were utilized. The grounding problems associated with the geometric stiffness are emphasized.Document ID19900015858Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBosela, Paul A.*(Cleveland State Univ. OH., United States)*Shaker, Francis J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Fertis, Demeter G.*(Akron Univ. OH., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:103490NASA-TM-103490Meeting InformationMeeting: Southeast Conference of Theoretical and Applied MechanicsLocation: Atlanta, GACountry: United StatesStart Date: March 22, 1990Accession Number90N25174Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-1008Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015858.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Michael L. Parker, a President and Director of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K  containing  distribution  or servicing  reports filed in respect of periods
included  in the year  covered  by this  annual  report,  of  WASHINGTON  MUTUAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-6;

     2. Based on my knowledge,  the  information  in these  reports,  taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  distribution  or  servicing  information
required to be provided  to the  trustee by the  servicer  under the pooling and
servicing, or similar,  agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicer
under the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement  and based  upon my
knowledge and the annual  compliance  review required under that agreement,  and
except as disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its  obligations
under that agreement; and

     5. The  reports  disclose  all  significant  deficiencies  relating  to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an  independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting  a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar  procedure,  as set forth in the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:

Atlantic  Mortgage and  Investment  Corp,  Aurora Loan Services,  Inc.,  Cendant
Mortgage,  Chase Mortgage Services, Inc, Columbia National  Inc,Countrywide Home
Loans, Inc, Downey Savings and Loan, First Chicago NBD, First Nationwide,  First
Republic  Savings Bank of NV,  Flagstar Bank,  FSB, GMAC Mortgage  Corp,  Golden
National Mortgage Banking, Guardian Mortgage Company, HSBC Mortgage Corporation,
Huntington  Mortgage  Company,   Lighthouse  Communtiy  Bank,  Matrix  Financial
Serivces  Corp,  National City  Mortgage,  Old Kent,  Standard  Mortgage Corp of
Georgia,  Suntrust Mortgage,  Inc, Union Bank of California,  Washington Mutual,
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage


Dated: March 15, 2004
                                     /s/ Michael L. Parker
                                         Michael L. Parker,
                                         President and Director
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Wiersma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1)                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)                       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                

| Dated:   July 31, 2007 | By:   /s/ Kevin J. Wiersma                |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                   | Kevin J. Wiersma

Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

 

 

36
§ 428.11 Effective date. ( a ) All provisions of this part apply on January 1, 2001, except: ( 1 ) For those districts whose 2001 water year commences prior to January 1, 2001, the applicability date of §§ 428.1 through 428.8 is October 1, 2000.
( b ) On January 1, 2001, this part applies to all farm operating arrangements between farm operators and trusts or legal entities that: ( 1 ) Are then in effect; or
( 2 ) Are initiated on, or after, January 1, 2001.
### §373a. Disposition of trust or restricted estate of intestate without heirs; successor tribe; sale of land

Upon final determination by the Secretary of the Interior that the Indian holder of a trust or restricted allotment of lands or an interest therein has died intestate without heirs, the lands or interest so owned, together with all accumulated rents, issues, and profits therefrom held in trust for the decedent, shall escheat to the tribe owning the land at the time of allotment subject to the payment of such creditors' claims as the Secretary of the Interior may find proper to be paid from the cash on hand or income accruing to said estate and subject to all valid existing agricultural, surface, and mineral leases and the rights of any person thereunder.

If the tribe which owned the land at the time of allotment has been reorganized or reconstituted by reason of amalgamation with another tribe or group of Indians or of subdivision within the tribe or otherwise, the land shall escheat to the tribe or group which has succeeded to the jurisdiction of the original tribe over the area in question. If neither the tribe which owned the land at the time of allotment nor a successor tribe or group exists, the land or interest therein shall be held in trust for such Indians as the Secretary may designate within the State or States wherein the land is situated or, if the Secretary determines that the land cannot appropriately be used by or for such Indians, it shall be sold, subject to all valid existing agricultural, surface, and mineral leases and the rights of any person thereunder, and the proceeds of such sale shall be held in trust for such Indians as the Secretary may designate, within the State or States wherein the land is situated.

(Nov. 24, 1942, ch. 640, §1, 56 Stat. 1021.)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn unsteady lifting surface method for single rotation propellersThe mathematical formulation of a lifting surface method for evaluating the steady and unsteady loads induced on single rotation propellers by blade vibration and inflow distortion is described. The scheme is based on 3-D linearized compressible aerodynamics and presumes that all disturbances are simple harmonic in time. This approximation leads to a direct linear integral relation between the normal velocity on the blade (which is determined from the blade geometry and motion) and the distribution of pressure difference across the blade. This linear relation is discretized by breaking the blade up into subareas (panels) on which the pressure difference is treated as approximately constant, and constraining the normal velocity at one (control) point on each panel. The piece-wise constant loads can then be determined by Gaussian elimination. The resulting blade loads can be used in performance, stability and forced response predictions for the rotor. Mathematical and numerical aspects of the method are examined. A selection of results obtained from the method is presented. The appendices include various details of the derivation that were felt to be secondary to the main development in Section 1.Document ID19900016624Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWilliams, Marc H.*(Purdue Univ. West Lafayette, IN, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberE-5428NAS 1.26:4302NASA-CR-4302Accession Number90N25940Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-499PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-4DDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016624.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3930.30 Diligent development milestones. ( a ) Operators must diligently develop the oil shale resources consistent with the terms and conditions of the lease, POD, and these regulations. If the operator does not maintain or comply with diligent development milestones, the BLM may initiate lease cancellation. In order to be considered diligently developing the lease, the lessee/operator must comply with the following diligence milestones: ( 1 ) Milestone 1. Within 2 years of the lease issuance date, submit to the proper BLM office an initial POD that meets the requirements of subpart 3931. The operator must revise the POD following subpart 3931, if the BLM determines that the initial POD is unacceptable;
( 2 ) Milestone 2. Within 3 years of the lease issuance date, submit a final POD. The BLM may, based on circumstances beyond the control of the lessee or operator, or on the complexity of the POD, grant a 1 year extension to the lessee or operator to submit a complete POD;
( 3 ) Milestone 3. Within 2 years after the BLM approves the final POD, apply for all required Federal and state permits and licenses;
( 4 ) Milestone 4. Before the end of the 7th year after lease issuance, begin permitted infrastructure installation, as required by the BLM approved POD; and
( 5 ) Milestone 5. Before the end of the 10th year after lease issuance, begin oil shale production.
( b ) Operators may apply for additional time to complete a milestone. The BLM may grant additional time for completing a milestone if the operator provides documentation that shows to the BLM's satisfaction that achieving the milestone by the deadline is not possible for reasons that are beyond the control of the operator. Allowable time extensions to meet milestone 4 will extend the requirement to begin production in the 10th lease year by an amount of time equal to the extension granted for milestone 4. This extension also extends the requirements for payments in lieu of production and minimum production under paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section.
( c ) Operators must maintain minimum annual production every year after the 10th lease year or pay in lieu of production according to the lease terms.
( d ) Each lease will provide for minimum production. The minimum production requirement stated in the lease must be met by the end of the 10th lease year and will be based on the BLM's estimate of the extraction technology to be used, the recoverable resources on the lease, expected life of the operation, and other factors the BLM considers.
( e ) Each lease will provide for payment in lieu of the minimum production for any particular year starting in the 10th lease year. Payments in lieu of production in year 10 of the lease satisfies Milestone 5 in paragraph (a)(5) of this section.