CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

FY 2013 vs. FY 2014 O&M COST ESTIMATE ANAYSIS

IRRIGATION

2013 2014 Variance Percent

Rates Rates (2014 Rate ‐ 2013 Rate) Change

Storage

Explanation of significant decrease/ increase in cost

Black Butte Reservoir 462,136 828,690 366,554 79.32%

Buchanan Reservoir 275,800 590,064 314,264 113.95%

Columbia‐Mowry System 152,371 163,113 10,742 7.05%

Coleman National Fish Hatchery 2,904,589 3,015,401 110,812 3.82%

Increase in cost is due to removal of north side of vegetation and roa

remediation, replacement of electrical controls of gates, lighting syste

Delta Cross Channel 79,195 686,456 607,261 766.79% and redial gate gear replacement.

Folsom Dam & Reservoir 438,837 447,534 8,697 1.98%

Folsom Pumping Plant 701,717 411,580 (290,137) ‐41.35%

Friant Dam & Reservoir 1,350,711 1,389,656 38,945 2.88%

Gianelli, WR PGP 3,090,741 2,939,402 (151,339) ‐4.90%

Due to more releases from the San Luis reservoir the Gianelli credit h

Less: Gianelli Credit (1,285,647) (2,331,465) (1,045,818) 81.35% increased significantly from prior year.

Hidden Reservoir 227,900 264,720 36,820 16.16%Hill, CA Whiskeytown Dam 512,795 247,861 (264,934) ‐51.66%

New Melones Dam & Reservoir 936,722 977,455 40,733 4.35%

Last year claim team inspected the dam and determine that Nimbus d

requires repair of 18 spill gates and painting. To perform above repair

Nimbus Dam & Reservoir 137,720 1,010,810 873,090 633.96% Bureau cost increased significantly from prior year.

Sacramento River 609,829 622,652 12,823 2.10%

San Joaquin River 115,328 118,450 3,122 2.71%

Security Costs 3,209,711 3,188,905 (20,806) ‐0.65%

Shasta Dam & Reservoir 1,209,307 1,408,752 199,445 16.49%

Sisk, BF San Luis Dam 4,296,937 4,217,001 (79,936) ‐1.86%

Trinity Dam & Reservoir 135,785 92,628 (43,157) ‐31.78%

Total 19,562,484 20,289,665 727,181 3.72% The overall increase is not significant.

ConveyanceDelta Barriers ‐ Unfunded                            ‐             2,773,545 2,773,545 100.00% Please see 2014 Foreword

Delta‐Mendota Canal 358,345 28,375 (329,970) ‐92.08%Water Wheeling Cost ‐Unfunded ‐ 1,386,772 1,386,772 100.00% Please see 2014 Foreword

DMC Subsidence Study 2,755                         ‐                                  (2,755) ‐100.00%Friant‐Kern Canal 22,318 32,469 10,151 45.48%Red Bluff Diversion Dam 36,202 36,657 455 1.26%

Red Bluff PP ‐                         ‐                                        ‐ 0.00%San Luis Canal 11,756 11,711 (45) ‐0.38%South Delta Hydrodynamics Fish Inv ‐ 0.00%

Tehama‐Colusa Canal 82,963 83,982 1,019 1.23%

TCC Fish Facilities 6,376 6,574 198 3.11%

Total 520,715 4,360,085 1,065,825 737.33% Cost is direct billed by Authority.

Less Direct billed (520,715) (199,768) ‐61.64%

Net Conveyance Cost ‐ 4,160,317
CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

FY 2013 vs. FY 2014 O&M COST ESTIMATE ANAYSIS

IRRIGATION

2013 2014 Variance Percent

Rates Rates (2014 Rate ‐ 2013 Rate) Change

Conveyance Pumping

Corning Pumping Plant 133,366 181,261 47,895 35.91%

Dos Amigos Pumping Plant 2,743,710 2,593,867 (149,843) ‐5.46%

O'Neill Pumping‐Generating Plant 1,754,271 1,271,274 (482,997) ‐27.53%

Regen. Credit ‐ O'Neill Pump‐Gen Plt (224)                         ‐                                       224 ‐100.00%

Jones Pumping Plant 11,145,394 10,803,892 (341,502) ‐3.06%

In‐ Lieu of Jones PP 76,880                         ‐                               (76,880) ‐100.00%

Total 15,853,397 14,850,295 (1,003,102) ‐6.33%

Less Direct billed (15,853,397) (14,850,295) (1,003,102) ‐6.33%

Net Conveyance Pumping Cost ‐                         ‐ Cost is direct billed by Authority.

Conveyance & Drainage

Kesterson Reservoir 200,000 175,000 (25,000) ‐12.50%

Direct pumping cost

Corning CanalCorning WD Canalside Relift ‐ Power 42,237 49,971 7,734 18.31%

Proberta WD Canalside Relift ‐ Power 2,252 3,112 860 38.19%Cow Creek Unit

Wintu‐Cow Creek PP ‐ Power/Bella Vista WD 53,952 58,946 4,994 9.26%

Contra Costa Canal

Contra Costa PP (Contra Costa WD) ‐

Cross Valley CanalDos Amigos PP and Banks 209,318 193,003 (16,315) ‐7.79%

San Felipe Unit

San Benito County WD

Gianelli, WR PGP 77,561 96,346 18,785 24.22%

Pacheco PP ‐ Power 28,801 64,564 35,763 124.17%

Santa Clara Valley WD

Coyote PP ‐ Power 5,666 17,039 11,373 200.72%Gianelli, WR PGP 84,112 93,494 9,382 11.15%

Pacheco PP ‐ Power 31,233 62,653 31,420 100.60%

San Luis Canal ‐ Fresno

Pleasant Valley Relifts 467,769 479,185 11,416 2.44%

Westlands WD Relifts 2,121,455 2,230,776 109,321 5.15%

San Luis Canal ‐ Tracy

Panoche WD Canalside Relift ‐ Power 608 754 146 24.01%

San Luis WD Canalside Relift ‐ Power 362,470 441,193 78,723 21.72%

Tehama‐Colusa Canal

Colusa County WD 186,158 230,675 44,517 23.91%

Dunnigan WD Canalside Relift ‐ Power 2,857 3,626 769 26.92%

Westside WD/GV WD Canalside Relift ‐ Power 11,611 13,327 1,716 14.78%

Kanawha WD Canalside Relift 31,655 35,619 3,964 12.52%

Orland‐Artois WD Canalside Relift 41,783 47,138 5,355 12.82%

The primary increase in direct pumping is due to PUE cost. CVP

consumption of PUE has increased from 23.37% to 29.59%; hence mo

Western and BOR costs being allocated to CVP customers through the

Cost sub allocation process. Moreover, California Independent System

Operator (CAISO) charges for scheduling Reclamation’s loads within t

Total Direct pumping cost 3,761,498 4,121,421 359,923 9.57% CAISO boundaries have increased causing this spike in the PUE cost.
CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

FY 2013 vs. FY 2014 O&M COST ESTIMATE ANAYSIS

IRRIGATION

2013 2014 Variance Percent

Rates Rates (2014 Rate ‐ 2013 Rate) Change

Water Marketing Expense

Suisun Marsh Protection ‐ 641,773 641,773 100.00%

Water Contract Administration 7,349,007 7,660,306 311,299 4.24%

Water and Power Systems Controls 4,372,210 4,728,612 356,402 8.15%

Other Expenses/Hazardous Material Managemen 4,894,468 3,696,935 (1,197,533) ‐24.47%

Hazardous Material Management Program ‐ 441,321 441,321 100.00%

Increase is due to the court ruling on the 2008/2009 USFWS/NMFS

Biological Opinions for

long‐term operation of the CVP and SWP, Reclamation will prepare a

updated Biological Assessment to reflect current

policies and priorities guiding the multi‐purpose operation of the CVP

General Expense 767,938 1,381,068 613,130 79.84% FY 2014, $1,867,000 has been set aside to perform these tasks.

Non‐Permanent Contractor Revenue (265,000) (94,640) 170,360 ‐64.29%

In 2014, Suisun Marsh Protection cost of $641,773 has budgeted but 

2013 there was no cost for Suisun Marsh Protection. Moreover, Non‐

Permanent Contractor Revenue has also been reduced significantly d

Stockton East WD. In 2013, Stockton East WD was considered Non‐

Total Water Marketing 17,118,623 18,455,375 1,336,752 7.81% Permanent Contractor hence revenue offset the water marketing cos

Extraordinary O&MStorage 1,406,759 2,182,363 775,604 55.13%

Conveyance pumping 599,394 9,063 (590,331) ‐98.49%

Direct pumping 159,897 16,942 (142,955) ‐89.40%

In 2014, following activities are budgeted under PL111‐11.

• Replacement of draft tube bulkhead hoist at Folsom Power plant

• Replace windings on Eight Units – Gianelli Pumping/Generation Plan

Total XO&M 2,166,050 2,208,368 42,318 1.95%

Grand Total 42,808,655 49,410,146 6,601,491 15.42%

Source: Schedule A‐9 of the 2013 and 2014 Irrigation Water Ratebooks.