alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
San Mateo, CA
                                                                  April 13, 1999
                                                                  $129,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of one hundred and twenty nine thousand dollars  ($129,000),  with
interest  from the date hereof at a rate of ten percent  (10%) per annum,  which
amount shall be secured by all of the assets of Borrower.  Said principal  shall
be due and  payable on demand by Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,
but in no event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred  eighty (180)
days after the date of this Note.  This Note may be prepaid at any time  without
penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1. Subordination - Creditor subordinates to Business Finance ("BF") any
security  interest or lien that  Creditor  may have in any property of Borrower.
All Subordinated  Debt is subordinated in right of payment to all obligations of
Borrower to BF now existing or hereafter arising.

         2.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         3. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         4.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 13 day of April, 1999.

                                          Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                          By: __________________

                                          Title: ________________
§ 4.1139 Written interrogatories to parties. ( a ) Any party may serve upon any other party written interrogatories to be answered in writing by the party served, or if the party served is a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as is available to the party. A copy of the interrogatories, answers, and all related pleadings shall be served on the administrative law judge and upon all parties to the proceeding.
( b ) Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath or affirmation, unless it is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated in lieu of an answer. The answer and objections shall be signed by the person making them. The party upon whom the interrogatories were served shall serve a copy of the answers and objections upon all parties to the proceeding within 30 days after service of the interrogatories, or within such shorter or longer period as the administrative law judge may allow.
( c ) Interrogatories may relate to any matters which can be inquired into under § 4.1132. An interrogatory otherwise proper is not necessarily objectionable merely because an answer to the interrogatory involves an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, but the administrative law judge may order that such an interrogatory need not be answered until after designated discovery has been completed or until a prehearing conference or other later time.
Exhibit 32.1


                                 POWERLINX, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of PowerLinx,  Inc., on Form 10-Q/A for
the period  ended  March 31,  2006 as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Michael  Tomlinson,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  PowerLinx,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by  PowerLinx,  Inc.  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Michael Tomlinson
--------------------------
Michael Tomlinson
Chief Executive Officer


August 22, 2006
### §2211. Governing body of tribe; construction of chapter as not vesting with authority not authorized by tribal constitution or by-laws

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as vesting the governing body of an Indian tribe with any authority which is not authorized by the constitution and by-laws or other organizational document of such tribe.

(Pub. L. 97–459, title II, §212, as added Pub. L. 98–608, §1(5), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3173.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", which was translated as reading "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 97–459, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
### PART VI—ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX

Sec.
55.
Alternative minimum tax imposed.
56.
Adjustments in computing alternative minimum taxable income.
56A.
Adjusted financial statement income.
57.
Items of tax preference.
58.
Denial of certain losses.
59.
Other definitions and special rules.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–169, title I, §10101(b)(2), Aug. 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1827, added item 56A.
#### Doss *v.*Ragan.

Holden, J.

The defendant in error sued J. R Doss and Brother, alleged to be a copartnership of which J. R. Doss and F. 0. Doss were members. The only answer filed was one by F. 0. Doss, denying that he was a member of the partnership. The jury rendered a verdict against this plea and in favor of the plaintiff. To the order of the court refusing a new trial F. 0. Doss excepted. The evidence authorized the jury to find that the connection of F. O. Doss with the partnership was as follows: the mercantile business was operated by J. R. Doss and F. C. Doss under the firm name of J. R. Doss and Brother. J. R. Doss furnished' all the money with which the business was begun. F. 0. Doss furnished no money, but only his services. The agreement between the parties was that each was to have, from the proceeds *M*the business as it was being carried on, an amount sufficient to pay his necessary expenses of living, and each was to have an equal amount for this purpose, and the net profits were to be equally divided between them. There was “no understanding as to the losses” of the firm, should there be any. *Held:*

*851February 24, 1911.

Complaint. Before. Judge Edwards. Floyd superior court. December 16, 1909.

*George A. H. Harris & Son,*for plaintiff in error.

*Sharp & Sharp,*contra.

1. The facts above recited constituted F. C. Doss a member of the partnership, at least relatively to third persons. *Brandon & Dreyer*v. *Conner,*117 *Ga.*759 (45 S. E. 371, 63 L. R. A. 260) ; *Callaway*v. *Waxelbaum Company,*128 *Ga.*508 (57 S. E. 763).

2. The only assignment of error is that the court erred1 in overruling the motion for new trial, based upon the general grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court committed no error in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the*Justices. *concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the Issuer).



I, Robert J. Cooney, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Issuer certify that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: February 15, 2006



/S/ ROBERT J. COONEYName: Robert J. Cooney
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
BankUnited Financial Corporation, a Florida corporation (the Company), for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), I, Humberto L. Lopez, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|SENIOR EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
|                                                                                         
|/s/ HUMBERTO L. LOPEZ                                                                    
|Humberto L. Lopez                                                                        

Dated: May 12, 2008
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date : April 15, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Stanley Weiner                    |   |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Name Stanley Weiner                                                                                                                  |   |
|                  |   | Title Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                        |   |
|                  |   |                                                                                                                                      |   |
Case 9:20-mj-08171-BER Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/29/2020 Page 1 of 7
Case 9:20-mj-08171-BER Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/29/2020 Page 2 of 7
Case 9:20-mj-08171-BER Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/29/2020 Page 3 of 7
Case 9:20-mj-08171-BER Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/29/2020 Page 4 of 7
Case 9:20-mj-08171-BER Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/29/2020 Page 5 of 7
Case 9:20-mj-08171-BER Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/29/2020 Page 6 of 7
Case 9:20-mj-08171-BER Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/29/2020 Page 7 of 7
MANE-VU Class I States’ Consultation

1) When – August 6, 2007
2) Where – MRPO Offices, Chicago, Illinois

*****Draft Agenda*****

10:00 am States Caucus MANE-VU and MWRPO States & RPO staff

10:30 am Welcome & Introductions - Goals for Today’s Meeting David Littell, ME DEP Chair, MANE-VU

10:45 am Overview of June’s Open Technical Call & MANE-VU Consultation Briefing Book Anna Garcia, OTC

11:00 am Summary of Reasonable Progress Work for MANE-VU Class I Areas - Proposed “ask” by the MANE-VU Class I States - Where the MANE-VU RPG is in 2018 based on the “ask” MANE-VU Class I State Representative

11:20 am Clarifying Questions All Participants

11:30 am Summary of Reasonable Progress Work for MWRPO Class I Areas - Proposed “ask” by MWRPO Class I States - Where the MWRPO RPGs are in 2018 MWRPO Class I State Representative

11:50 am Clarifying Questions All Participants

12:00 pm Lunch

1:00 pm EPA and FLM Perspectives on RPGs and Reasonable Measures Work EPA and FLM Representatives

1:30 pm Roundtable Discussion on Reasonable Progress Goals and Reasonable Measures All Participants

2:45 pm Preliminary Summary of Consultation Discussions - Areas with agreement - Areas with no agreement

3:00 pm Next Steps

3:15 pm End of Consultation
#### § 3162.3-3 Other lease operations.

Prior to commencing any operation on the leasehold which will result in additional surface disturbance, other than those authorized under § 3162.3-1 or § 3162.3-2, the operator shall submit a proposal on Form 3160-5 to the authorized officer for approval. The proposal shall include a surface use plan of operations.

[82 FR 61949, Dec. 29, 2017]
Exhibit 32
                                   ----------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SABRANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Laser  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we, B.
Joyce  Wickham  and Mark L.  Ballard,  President,  chief  Executive  Officer and
Director;  and Vice  President,  Treasurer,  Assistant  Secretary  and Director,
respectively,  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:

         1.   The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The  information  contained in the report  fairly  presents in all
              material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
              operations of the Company.


August 19, 2003


/s/ B. Joyce Wickham
--------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director


/s/ Mark L. Ballard
-------------------
Vice President, Treasurer,
Assistant Secretary and Director
#### § 3838.16 What happens if the surface owner of the SRHA lands changes?

If the surface owner transfers all or part of the surface to a new owner after you have recorded a NOITL and served it on the surface owner, you do not have to serve a copy of the NOITL on the new surface owners.
### Subpart C—Insolvent Plans

Sec.
[418 to 418D. Repealed.]
418E.
Insolvent plans.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2014**—Pub. L. 113–235, div. O, title I, §108(b)(3)(B), (C), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2789, substituted "Insolvent Plans" for "Special Rules for Multiemployer Plans" in subpart heading and struck out items 418 "Reorganization status", 418A "Notice of reorganization and funding requirements", 418B "Minimum contribution requirement", 418C "Overburden credit against minimum contribution requirement", and 418D "Adjustments in accrued benefits".

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–364, title II, §202(a), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1271, added subpart C heading "Special Rules for Multiemployer Plans" and items 418 to 418E.
# Az Európai Unió C 217A/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 217A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 63. évfolyam2020. július 1. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 217A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

63. évfolyam2020. július 1.

---

| Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- |
| | Helyesbítések |
| 2020/C 217 A/01 | Helyesbítés a következőhöz: Szándéknyilatkozati felhívás – Számvevők a következő területeken: i. matematika és statisztika; ii. adattudomány, digitális ellenőrzés, adat- és hálózati elemzés, adat- és szövegbányászat, folyamatautomatizálás és folyamatbányászat – Ideiglenes alkalmazott (AD 5–AD 9 besorolási fokozat) ( HL C 185 A., 2020.6.4. ) | 1 |

Tartalom

Oldal

Helyesbítések

2020/C 217 A/01

Helyesbítés a következőhöz: Szándéknyilatkozati felhívás – Számvevők a következő területeken: i. matematika és statisztika; ii. adattudomány, digitális ellenőrzés, adat- és hálózati elemzés, adat- és szövegbányászat, folyamatautomatizálás és folyamatbányászat – Ideiglenes alkalmazott (AD 5–AD 9 besorolási fokozat) ( HL C 185 A., 2020.6.4. )

( HL C 185 A., 2020.6.4. )

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

Helyesbítések

| 1.7.2020 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 217/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2020

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 217/1

---

Helyesbítés a következőhöz: Szándéknyilatkozati felhívás – Számvevők a következő területeken: i. matematika és statisztika; ii. adattudomány, digitális ellenőrzés, adat- és hálózati elemzés, adat- és szövegbányászat, folyamatautomatizálás és folyamatbányászat – Ideiglenes alkalmazott (AD 5–AD 9 besorolási fokozat)

(
  Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 185. A, 2020. június 4.
  )

(2020/C 217 A/01)

A 4. oldalon:

a következő szövegrész:

„A pályázatok benyújtásának határideje 2020. július 2., 12.00 óra (közép-európai idő szerint).”

helyesen:

helyesen:

„A pályázatok benyújtásának határideje 2020. szeptember 15., 12.00 óra (közép-európai idő szerint).”

---
§ 4.1392 Contents of request; amendment of request; responses. ( a ) The request for review: ( 1 ) Must include: ( i ) A clear statement of the reasons for appeal;
( ii ) A request for specific relief;
( iii ) A copy of the decision appealed from; and
( iv ) Any other relevant information; and
( 2 ) May not exceed 30 pages, excluding exhibits, declarations, and other attachments, unless the Board orders otherwise upon motion for good cause shown.
( b ) All interested parties shall file an answer or motion in response to a request for review or a statement that no answer or motion will be filed within 15 days of receipt specifically admitting or denying facts or alleged errors stated in the request and setting forth any other matters to be considered on review.
( c ) A request for review may be amended once as a matter of right prior to receipt of an answer or motion or statement filed in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. Thereafter, a motion for leave to amend the request shall be filed with the Board.
( d ) An interested party may file an answer, motion, or statement as described in paragraph (b) of this section in response to an amended request for review as follows: ( 1 ) If the request for review is amended as a matter of right, the answer, motion, or statement must be filed within the longer of the following periods: ( i ) The time remaining for response to the original request for review; or
( ii ) Ten days after receipt of the amended request for review; and
( 2 ) If the Board grants a motion to amend a request for review, the answer, motion, or statement must be filed within the time set by the Board in its order granting the motion.
( e ) The filing of a reply is discouraged. However, a person who filed a request for review may file a reply that: ( 1 ) Is limited to the issues raised in an answer or motion;
( 2 ) Does not exceed 20 pages, excluding exhibits, declarations, and other attachments, unless the Board orders otherwise upon motion for good cause shown; and
( 3 ) Is filed within: ( i ) Fifteen days after service of the answer or motion under paragraph (b) or (d)(1) of this section; or
( ii ) The time set by the Board in its order under paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
[52 FR 39530, Oct. 22, 1987, as amended at 75 FR 64670, Oct. 20, 2010]