alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Executors of the Will of Ira Ryerson, deceased, for Directions.

1. Under the eighth section of the revised act concerning legacies, *(liev.*■ *Stnt,*1874, *p.*489,) it is discretionary with the executor, whether he will require security before paying over to a legatee the amount of a bequest for life or years.

2. Where the testator gives to a legatee for life the absolute possession and control of the fund, the executors may pay it over without requiring security.

On petition.

*Jlr. Wm. Pennington,*for the executors.

The Chancellor.

Ira Ryerson, by the second section of his will, which is -dated January 8th, 1870, gave and bequeathed to his wife, §6000, absolutely. The third section is as follows : *“*I also give to my said wife, and direct my executors to pay to her, the sum of §14,000, to be by her used during her natural life, at her pleasure; hereby giving her power to invest and ro-invest the same in her own name, in the same manner I might do if living, and to appoint the same among my .legatees, by will, after her decease, according to her own *44judgment and discretion. But should the said sum of $14,000, or any part thereof, remain undisposed of by my said wife as aforesaid, at the time of her death, I give and bequeath the whole, or the part thereof, as the case may be, so undisposed of by my said wife, to my legatees, in proportion to the legacies bequeathed by this, my will,” &c. The testator appointed his wife and Henry A. Williams his executors. They,have both proved the will, and taken upon themselves the execution thereof. The question submitted by the petition is, whether they may safely pay $14,000 to Mrs. Ryerson without requiring security. It will be observed, that the gift of the fund is to her, and the executors are directed to pay it over to her. The will gives her power to invest and re-invest it in her own name, in the same manner as the testator might do if living. No doubt is suggested as to her pecuniary responsibility. It is said that none is entertained, but the sole question is, whether, under the provisions of the eighth section of the revised act concerning legacies, security should not be required. That section does not make it obligatory on the executors to require security in the cases therein mentioned, but leaves it to their discretion. The intention of the testator, that Mrs. Ryerson should have absolute possession and control of the fund, is unequivocally expressed.

The executors would, under the circumstances, be justified in paying her the money without requiring security.
O M B C ontr o l N o . 2060- 0336 U. S . ENV I RONM ENT A LP R OT ECT I ON A GE NCY A P P L ICA T ION FOR FEDERA LOP ERA T ING P E RMIT , 4 0 CFR P A RT7 1 APPLICATION FORM GIS - GENERAL INFORM ATION AND S U M M ARY Instruc tions: Com p le te this f o rm onc e f o r the part 71 sourc e (f a c ility ). A. M a ilin g Ad d r e ss a n d Co n t a c t In fo r ma t io n Fa c ilityna me ______________________________________________________________________ Ma iling a ddre s s : Stre e tor P . O . Box _______________________________________________________________ C ity__________________________________________ Sta t e _______ ZI P ___________ - ________ Conta c tpe rs on: _________________________________________ T itle ____________________________________ T e le phone ( ______ ) ________ - ___________ Ex t. _________ Fa c s imile ( _______ ) ________ - ___________ B . Fa c ility Lo c a tio n T e m p o r aryso u r ce? ___ Y e s ___ N o P l a n t s ite loc a tion __________________________________________________ C ity__________________________________ Stat e _______ C ounty____________ EP AR e g i on ________ Is the f a c ilityloc a t e d w ithin: I ndia n la nds ? ___Y ES ___ N O O C S w a te r s ? ___Y ES ___ N O No n at t a i n me n tarea? ___ Y E S ___ N O I f y e s , f o rw h a ta i r polluta nts ? __________ W ithin 50 mile s of a f

f e c t e d Sta t e ? ___ Y E S ___ N O I f y e s , Wh a tSta t e ( s ) ? _____________ C. Ow n e r N a me _______________________________________________ Str e e t/ P . O . B o x ________________________________ C ity_________________________________________ Stat e _______ ZI P ____________ - ________ T e le phone ( _______ ) ________ - ____________ Ex t. _________ D. Op erator N a me _______________________________________________ Str e e t/ P . O . B o x ________________________________ C ity_________________________________________ Stat e _______ ZI P ____________ - ________ T e le phone ( _______ ) ________ - ____________ Ex t. _________
**EXHIBIT 31.1**I, Jason Liddell, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1;     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to thedepositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion inthese reports is included in these reports;     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee underthe pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annualcompliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, thedepositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the depositor ortrustee with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report provided by anindependent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform SingleAttestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling orservicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and its officers and agents.        Date:  March 26, 2007 /s/ Jason Liddell   Vice President      
10
### §673. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–375, title I, §108(b), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1820

Section, act Aug. 21, 1951, ch. 338, §3, 65 Stat. 194, directed Secretary of the Interior to make a full and complete progress report to Congress of his activities and of expenditures authorized under former section 671 of this title.
(No. 1024

Claimant awarded $393.72.)

#### Federal Match Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 19, 1927.*

Franchise *tax*— claimant *entitled to refund when.*There being no disputeis to the facts and no objection by the State, the court enters an award in favor of claimant.

Benj. F. Cassiday, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim of the Federal Match Corporation for a refund of $393.72 franchise tax erroneously paid to the Secretary of State for the period beginning July 1, 1925, and ending June 30, 1926, in excess of the amount legally due under the provisions of the General Corporation Act.

The Attorney General first filed a demurrer on behalf of " the State, and afterward filed a statement, attached to which is a copy of a letter from the Secretary of State admitting claimant is' entitled to a refund of $393.72, and the Attorney General consents to an award in favor of claimant for that amount.

As the State was overpaid that amount, the demurrer will be overruled and claimant awarded the sum of $393.72.
EXHIBIT 11--STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



                       Computation of Earnings Per Share


                                 Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                     March 31,                March 31,
                                  1997         1996       1997         1996


Average Shares Outstanding
     Net Income                $  903,366   $  608,500   $1,694,073   $1,851,962
     Average number of
      common shares
      outstanding               1,841,936    2,011,490    1,847,178    1,998,284
     Earnings per average
       shares outstanding      $     0.49   $     0.30   $     0.92   $     0.93


Primary*

     Net Income                $  903,366   $  608,500   $1,694,073   $1,851,962
     Average number of
       common shares
       outstanding              1,841,936    2,011,490    1,847,178    1,998,284
     Add incremental shares
        for stock options          57,255       67,487       56,686       76,086
     Adjusted average
        shares                  1,899,191    2,078,977    1,903,864    2,074,370

     Primary earnings
       per share               $     0.48   $     0.29   $     0.89   $     0.89




*Reported as earnings per share on a diluted basis
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Avantogen Oncology, Inc., on Form 10-QSB
      for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Michael
      Hillmeyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
      (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                    August 9, 2007By:
              /s/
                        Michael HillmeyerMichael
                        HillmeyerChief
                        Financial Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 3503.21 What happens if the surface of the land I am interested in belongs to a non-Federal political subdivision or charitable organization? ( a ) BLM will notify the entity who owns the surface of the lands included within your permit or lease application if that entity is: ( 1 ) Any State or political subdivision, agency or instrumentality thereof;
( 2 ) A college or any other educational corporation or association; or
( 3 ) A charitable or religious corporation or association.
( b ) The entity who owns the surface of the lands in your application will have up to 90 days to suggest any lease stipulations to protect existing surface improvements or uses, or to object to the permit or lease. BLM will then decide whether to issue the permit or lease and which, if any, stipulations identified by the surface owner to include, based on how the interests of the United States would best be served.
January 8, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE ESTATE OF DEBORAH L. ADAMS, DECEASED

NO. 14-12-00064-CV 

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Kami Haack, 

signed January 6, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the 

judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for 

proceedings in accordance with the court’s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee, Kami Haack.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
### **[Subchapter X—Repealed]**
(No. 690

Claim denied.)

#### Pyramid Lumber Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 10, 1927.*

Franchise *tax*— when *court without jurisdiction to refund.*The case is governed by the decision of the court announced in the case of *Moline Plow Company*v. *State, supra.*

Hopkins, Stark & Hopkins, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Edward C. Fitch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

For the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in this court in the case of *Moline Plow Company*v. *State of Illinois,*No. 687a, this claim is disallowed.
Sacramento River

11 12

14

13

T11N R2E

SSUUTTTTEE RR CCOO

YYOOLL OO CC OO

33.75 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-4178A-R-1

Exhibit B

Leiser, Dorothy L.

725-202-86

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.25 0.5

Miles

Date: November 9, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\leiser_dorothy_l\leiser_dorothy_l.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Majority and

Dissenting Opinion s filed October 27 , 2022.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00682

- CV

IN RE EQUINOR TEXAS ONSHORE PROPERTIES F /K/A STATOIL TEXAS ONSHORE PROPERTIES LLC ; EQUINOR MARKETING & TRADING (US) INC. ; AND EQUINOR NATURAL GAS LLC , Relator s

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022

- 05368



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 22, 2022

, relator s Equinor Texas Onshore Properties f/k/a
Statoil Texas Onshore Properties LLC ; Equinor Marketing & Trading (US) Inc ; , and
Equinor Natural Gas LLC filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator

asks this court to compel the Honorable Donna Roth, presiding judge of the 295th2

District Court of Harris County

, to vacate her August 31, 2022 order granting real party in interest’s motion to compel arbitration and denying relators’ application for
temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and permanent injunction

. Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson (Spain, J., dissenting)

.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 19
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 19
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: March 11, 2008



/s/ DAVID S. SMITHDavid S. SmithPresident and Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is
not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The foregoing certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-80743-CIV-MARRA

DAVID POSCHMANN,

Plaintiff,

v.

S & F PROPERTIES OF THE 

PALM BEACHES, INC. and 

MNSB MANAGEMENT, INC.,

Defendants.

__________________________/

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With 

Prejudice [DE 9].

THE COURT has considered the Notice, and the pertinent portions of the record, and 

being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Cause be, and the same is, hereby DISMISSED 

with prejudice, with each side to bear his/its own fees and costs, except as otherwise agreed in 

the parties' settlement agreement. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(i). Any pending motions are 

denied as moot. This case is CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, 

this 1

st day of July, 2020.

KENNETH A. MARRA

United States District Judge

Case 9:20-cv-80743-KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/02/2020 Page 1 of 1
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 219I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 219I |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 63° anno3 luglio 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 219I

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

63° anno3 luglio 2020

---

| Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informazioni |
| | INFORMAZIONI PROVENIENTI DALLE ISTITUZIONI, DAGLI ORGANI E DAGLI ORGANISMI DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA |
| | Commissione europea |
| 2020/C 219 I/01 | Comunicazione del rinvio dell’entrata in applicazione delle disposizioni del MiFIR in materia di libero accesso per quanto riguarda gli strumenti derivati negoziati in borsa | 1 |

Sommario

pagina

IV   Informazioni

INFORMAZIONI PROVENIENTI DALLE ISTITUZIONI, DAGLI ORGANI E DAGLI ORGANISMI DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA

Commissione europea

2020/C 219 I/01

Comunicazione del rinvio dell’entrata in applicazione delle disposizioni del MiFIR in materia di libero accesso per quanto riguarda gli strumenti derivati negoziati in borsa

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

IV Informazioni

INFORMAZIONI PROVENIENTI DALLE ISTITUZIONI, DAGLI ORGANI E DAGLI ORGANISMI DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA

Commissione europea

| 3.7.2020 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CI 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2020

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CI 219/1

---

Comunicazione del rinvio dell’entrata in applicazione delle disposizioni del MiFIR in materia di libero accesso per quanto riguarda gli strumenti derivati negoziati in borsa

(2020/C 219 I/01)

L’articolo 54, paragrafo 2, del regolamento (UE) n. 600/2014 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio (1) («MiFIR») prevede un periodo transitorio durante il quale l’articolo 35 o 36 del MiFIR non si applica alle controparti centrali (CCP) o alle sedi di negoziazione che hanno chiesto di beneficiare del regime transitorio per quanto riguarda gli strumenti derivati negoziati in borsa.

Il periodo transitorio scade il 3 luglio 2020. Nell’attuale contesto di mercato, caratterizzato da un alto grado di incertezza e di volatilità a causa della pandemia di Covid-19, aumentano i rischi operativi delle CCP e delle sedi di negoziazione. L’aumento dei rischi impone una maggiore attenzione alla continuità operativa, e nell’attuale contesto la valutazione delle richieste di accesso può avere ripercussioni negative sul regolare funzionamento dei mercati della negoziazione e della compensazione degli strumenti derivati negoziati in borsa. I colegislatori hanno pertanto convenuto di prorogare il periodo transitorio fino al 3 luglio 2021.

Si comunica pertanto ai partecipanti al mercato che i colegislatori hanno deciso di prorogare le disposizioni transitorie di cui all’articolo 54, paragrafo 2, relative all’articolo 35 o 36 del MiFIR, a decorrere dal 4 luglio 2020. La proroga si applica alle CCP o alle sedi di negoziazione che hanno chiesto alle autorità competenti di beneficiare delle disposizioni transitorie per quanto riguarda i derivati negoziati in borsa.

---

(1)  GU L 173 del 12.6.2014, pag. 84.

---
§ 3509.18 What will BLM do after it receives my application for a future interest lease? ( a ) After BLM receives your application for a future interest lease, we will notify all other interest owners that they have 90 days to file applications for the same mineral interest.
( b ) If any other interest owners timely apply, we will hold a competitive lease sale among the qualified applicants. BLM will establish standards for the competitive sale similar to those under subpart 3508 of this part, and provide notice to all of the qualified applicants.
( c ) If no other qualified owners timely apply, BLM may issue a future interest lease to you. BLM will establish the amount of the bonus bid you must pay through appraisal.
#### § 3910.44 Collection and submission of data.

Upon the BLM's request, the licensee must provide copies of all data obtained under the exploration license in the format requested by the BLM. To the extent authorized by the Freedom of Information Act, the BLM will consider the data confidential and proprietary until the BLM determines that public access to the data will not damage the competitive position of the licensee or the lands involved have been leased, whichever comes first. The licensee must submit to the proper BLM office all data obtained under the exploration license.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0674 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-217-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date