alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 3:17 PM

To: 'Dyan'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Carlson, Michael CTR (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Trumbull Unamnned LLC

Dear Ms. Dyan Gibbens:  

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2014‐

0890).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.  

For both proposed aircraft, the Arcturus T‐20 and OSU Noctua Fixed wing quiet UAV, please provide the following

information:

‐ Operation(s) or Flight Manual(s) containing: flight endurance, maximum take‐off weight (including payload), fuel type

and quantity, airspeed capabilities, and dimensions (size).

‐ Maintenance Manual(s), including specifics relative to fueling procedures and safety precautions associated with

fueling procedures.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 5/29/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.  

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.  

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
# Euroopan unionin C 232A/21.

| | ISSN 1725-2490 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 232A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 48. vuosikerta21. syyskuu 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2490

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 232A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

48. vuosikerta21. syyskuu 2005

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Tiedotteita |
| | Komissio |
| 2005/C 232A/1 | Ilmoitus yhteisön kalastuksenvalvontaviraston pääjohtajan viran täyttämisestä (palkkaluokka A*14) — KOM/2005/10004 | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

III   Tiedotteita

Komissio

2005/C 232A/1

Ilmoitus yhteisön kalastuksenvalvontaviraston pääjohtajan viran täyttämisestä (palkkaluokka A*14) — KOM/2005/10004

1

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

III Tiedotteita

Komissio

| 21.9.2005 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2005

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 232/1

---

ILMOITUS YHTEISÖN KALASTUKSENVALVONTAVIRASTON PÄÄJOHTAJAN VIRAN TÄYTTÄMISESTÄ

(Palkkaluokka A*14)

KOM/2005/10004

(2005/C 232 A/01)

Yhteisön kalastuksenvalvontavirasto etsii johtajaa.

Hakijoiden on oltava Euroopan unionin jonkin jäsenvaltion kansalaisia.

Viraston hallintoneuvosto nimittää johtajan Euroopan komission valitsemien ja ehdottamien hakijoiden luettelosta. Johtaja nimitetään väliaikaiseksi toimihenkilöksi palkkaluokkaan A*14 Euroopan yhteisöjen muuhun henkilöstöön sovellettavien palvelussuhteen ehtojen 2 a artiklan mukaisesti. Toimikauden pituus on viisi vuotta, ja sitä voidaan jatkaa kerran enintään viidellä vuodella. Virasto ja komissio noudattavat tasa-arvopolitiikkaa.

Toimenkuvauksen, hakulomakkeen ja hakemusten lähettämistä koskevat ohjeet voi ladata Internet-osoitteesta:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

tai

http://europa.eu.int/comm/fisheries

Hakemusten lähettämisen määräaika on 21. lokakuuta 2005 (mistä postileimaa pidetään osoituksena).

---
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59979-59980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22381]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>P054]


State of South Carolina

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration for 
Public Assistance on September 15, 2004 the U.S. Small Business 
Administration is activating its disaster loan program only for private 
non-profit organizations that provide essential services of a 
governmental nature. I find that Berkeley, Charleston and Williamsburg 
Counties in the State of South Carolina

[[Page 59980]]

constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by Tropical Storm 
Gaston occurring on August 28-30, 2004. Applications for loans for 
physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the 
close of business on November 15, 2004 at the address listed below or 
other locally announced locations:

U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One 
Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308.

    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations without credit available elsewhere.     2.900
  Non-Profit Organizations with credit available elsewhere....     4.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is P05408.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59008).

    Dated: September 28, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-22381 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
REGULATORY EVALUAnON

Directarate Identifier: 2010-NM-065-AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explam NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Isthe AD significant? YES ( )explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on asubstantial number ofsmalJ entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is

### it appropriate to include specific requlrements for aircratl operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only Illode of transportation? YES ( )explain NO (X)
### PART III—CHANGES IN RATES DURING A TAXABLE YEAR

Sec.
15.
Effect of changes.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §474(b)(3), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 830, substituted "15. Effect of changes" for "21. Effect of changes".
### §5363. Taxpaid wine bottling house operations

In addition to the operations described in section 5352, the proprietor of a taxpaid wine bottling house may, subject to regulations issued by the Secretary, on such premises mix wine of the same kind and taxable grade to facilitate handling; preserve, filter, or clarify wine; and conduct operations not involving wine where such operations will not jeopardize the revenue or conflict with wine operations.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1381; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(a)(45), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 287.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5363, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 665, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1979—Pub. L. 96–39 struck out provision that this subchapter apply to any wine received on the bottling premises of any distilled spirits plant for bottling, packaging, or repackaging, and to all operations relative thereto and provision that sections 5021, 5081, and 5082, not apply to the mixing or treatment of taxpaid wine under this section.

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 810 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 18-3037 September Term, 2017

1:17-cr-00201-ABJ-1

Filed On: July 12, 2018

United States of America,

Appellee

v.

Paul John Manafort, Jr.,

Appellant

BEFORE: Rogers, Tatel, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for release pending appeal, the response

thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion be denied. The court declines to exercise its

authority under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 9(a)(3) because appellant has not

shown that immediate relief before resolution of his expedited appeal is warranted.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Robert J. Cavello 

Deputy Clerk
Exhibit
        32.2
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Litfunding, Corp., a Nevada
        corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
        2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the "Report"), Terry Gabby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
        to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Litfunding, Corp., and will be retained by Litfunding, Corp., and furnished
        to
        the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/ Terry
                GabbyTerry
                  Gabby
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
                April
                  17, 2007






1
### §1397. Other definitions and special rules

#### (a) Wages

For purposes of this subpart—

#### (1) In general

The term "wages" has the same meaning as when used in section 51.

#### (2) Certain training and educational benefits

#### (A) In general

The following amounts shall be treated as wages paid to an employee:

(i) Any amount paid or incurred by an employer which is excludable from the gross income of an employee under section 127, but only to the extent paid or incurred to a person not related to the employer.

(ii) In the case of an employee who has not attained the age of 19, any amount paid or incurred by an employer for any youth training program operated by such employer in conjunction with local education officials.

#### (B) Related person

A person is related to any other person if the person bears a relationship to such other person specified in section 267(b) or 707(b)(1), or such person and such other person are engaged in trades or businesses under common control (within the meaning of subsections (a) and (b) of section 52). For purposes of the preceding sentence, in applying section 267(b) or 707(b)(1), "10 percent" shall be substituted for "50 percent".

#### (b) Controlled groups

For purposes of this subpart—

(1) all employers treated as a single employer under subsection (a) or (b) of section 52 shall be treated as a single employer for purposes of this subpart, and

(2) the credit (if any) determined under section 1396 with respect to each such employer shall be its proportionate share of the wages giving rise to such credit.

#### (c) Certain other rules made applicable

For purposes of this subpart, rules similar to the rules of section 51(k) and subsections (c), (d), and (e) of section 52 shall apply.

(Added Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13301(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 551.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1397, added Pub. L. 95–600, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2895, related to special rules applicable to an electing general stock ownership corporation, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–514, title XIII, §1303(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2658.
Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

2 Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr., SE, Suite 1154, Atlanta, Georgia 30334-9000 

Chris Clark, Commissioner 

Environmental Protection Division 

F. Allen Barnes, Director 

Phone: 404/656-7802 FAX: 404/651-9425 

July 6,2010 

Mr. A. Stanley Meiburg 

Acting Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 4 

Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

Re: 	 Proposal to list Armstrong World Industries plant, their remote landfill, and the Former 

Macon Naval Ordnance Plant landfill 

Dear Mr. Meiburg: 

This letter will provide Georgia's concurrence with the proposed listing of the Armstrong World 

Industries (A WI) plant, their remote landfill, and the Former Macon Naval Ordnance Plant 

(FMNOP) landfill (collectively known as the "Site") on the National Priority List (NPL). As a result 

of the PCB contamination emanating from the Armstrong Plant and the two (2) remote landfills 

(AWl's and the FMNOP's), EPD issued a fish consumption advisory for Rocky Creek due to 

elevated PCB levels in fish tissue. Although we have attempted to work with A WI and the Army 

Corps of Engineers (the party responsible for remediation of releases at FMNOP) since 2006 to 

address contamination from these parcels, they have been nonresponsive. The NPL listing will help 

compel both parties to move forward with the investigation and remedial action that is needed at the 

Site. 

We appreciate EP A's assistance and partnership in addressing this site. We look forward to working 

with your staff through the listing, investigation and oversight process. If you have any questions, 

please contact Amy Potter at 404-657-8662. 

F. Allen Barnes 

Director 

FAB:ap 

File: Armstrong 

FMNOP S:IRDRIVE\AMY\DoD UnitlFUDS\AWI-AiP-FMNOPlsupport letter for NPL landfills &. A WI.doc
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsGeolocation Assessment Algorithm for CALIPSO Using Coastline DetectionCloud-Aerosol Lidar Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) is a joint satellite mission between NASA and the French space agency CNES. The investigation will gather long-term, global cloud and aerosol optical and physical properties to improve climate models. The CALIPSO spacecraft is scheduled to launch in 2004 into a 98.2 inclination, 705 km circular orbit approximately 3 minutes behind the Aqua spacecraft. The payload consists of a two-wavelength polarization-sensitive lidar, and two passive imagers operating in the visible (0.645 mm) and infrared (8.7 - 12.0 mm) spectral regions. The imagers are nadir viewing and co-aligned with the lidar. Earth viewing measurements are geolocated to the Earth fixed coordinate system using satellite ephemeris, Earth rotation and geoid, and instrument pointing data. The coastline detection algorithm will assess the accuracy of the CALIPSO geolocation process by analyzing Wide Field Camera (WFC) visible ocean land boundaries. Processing space-time coincident MODIS and WFC scenes with the coastline algorithm will help verify the co-registration requirement with Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) data. This paper quantifies the accuracy of the coastline geolocation assessment algorithm.Document ID20020094323Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsCurrey, J. Chris*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 2002Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberL-18247NASA/TP-2002-211956NAS 1.60:211956Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 259-40-01-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020094323.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             50
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1239
<ALLOWANCES>                                      188
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1749
<PP&E>                                           1329
<DEPRECIATION>                                    703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1328
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        10377
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                      1211
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10529)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2387
<SALES>                                          2059
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2059
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    7
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    11
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                11
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                       11
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.00
        


</TABLE>
#### Fred B. Chapman, Respondent, v. Globe Malleable Iron and Steel Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the verdict is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence on the questions of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of 1stConstitution Bancorp (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ ROBERT F. MANGANO
|Name:                 |  | Robert F. Mangano                    
|Title:                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                 |  | March 24, 2005                       
|                     
|/s/ JOSEPH M. REARDON
|Name:                 |  | Joseph M. Reardon                    
|Title:                |  | Senior Vice President and Treasurer  
|Date:                 |  | March 24, 2005
### §459d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 459d was editorially reclassified as section 5505 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6812

MARCUS LE’SHAWN DIXON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir., D.O.C. of VA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:12-cv-00429-MHL)

Submitted: November 30, 2018 Decided: December 7, 2018

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus Le’Shawn Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Le’Shawn Dixon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012); Reid v. 

Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004), abrogated in part by United States v. 

McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 & n.7 (4th Cir. 2015). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district 

court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When 

the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both 

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dixon has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, deny Dixon’s motion for an evidentiary hearing, and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED