alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 2:20-CV-14159-ROSENBERG/MAYNARD 

DJ LINCOLN ENTERPRISES, INC. ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) 

 ) 

GOOGLE, LLC ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 ) 

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO 

RULE TO SHOW CAUSE 

Plaintiff, DJ Lincoln Enterprises, Inc. (“Lincoln” or “Plaintiff”), by counsel, 

pursuant to the Court’s Rule to Show Cause [ECF No. 56], respectfully responds as 

follows: 

 1. Lincoln’s memorandum in opposition to Google’s motion for attorney’s 

fees was due September 29, 2021. 

 2. Counsel for Lincoln inadvertently calendared the due date for filing 

Lincoln’s response to Google motion as October 4, 2021. 

 3. On October 5, 2021, Lincoln filed its Memorandum in Opposition to 

Google’s motion. 

 4. Lincoln simultaneously filed a motion for leave pursuant to Rule 

6(b)(1)(B) to file its Memorandum. In its motion for leave, Lincoln explains why the 

court should extend the deadline and permit Lincoln’s late filing. 

Case 2:20-cv-14159-RLR Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2021 Page 1 of 3
2 

 5. Lincoln’s Memorandum in Opposition explains why Google’s motion for 

attorney’s fees should not be granted. 

 WHEREFORE, Lincoln respectfully requests the Court to dismiss the show 

cause. 

DATED: October 5, 2021 

 DJ LINCOLN ENTERPRISES, INC. 

 By: /s/ Steven S. Biss 

 Steven S. Biss (VSB # 32972) 

 300 West Main Street, Suite 102 

 Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 

 Telephone: (804) 501-8272 

 Facsimile: (202) 318-4098 

 Email: stevenbiss@earthlink.net

 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

 Jordan Reid Wagner (Florida Bar No: 14852) 

 73 SW Flagler Avenue 

 Stuart, FL 34994 

 Phone: (772) 286-0023 

 Service email: jwagner@kibbeylaw.com

 Counsel for the Plaintiff 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on October 5, 2021 a copy of the foregoing was filed 

electronically using the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send notice of electronic 

filing to counsel for the Defendant and all interested parties receiving notices via 

CM/ECF. 

Case 2:20-cv-14159-RLR Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2021 Page 2 of 3
3 

 By: /s/ Steven S. Biss 

 Steven S. Biss (VSB # 32972) 

 300 West Main Street, Suite 102 

 Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 

 Telephone: (804) 501-8272 

 Facsimile: (202) 318-4098 

 Email: stevenbiss@earthlink.net

 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

 Jordan Reid Wagner (Florida Bar No: 14852) 

 73 SW Flagler Avenue 

 Stuart, FL 34994 

 Phone: (772) 286-0023 

 Service email: jwagner@kibbeylaw.com

 Counsel for the Plaintiff

Case 2:20-cv-14159-RLR Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2021 Page 3 of 3
PUBLICATIONS & DOCUMENTS || DAG Homepage || USDOJ Homepage

**SURVEY OF THE FEDERAL DEATH PENALTY SYSTEM**

FULL VERSION WordPerfect |            ZIPPED .PDF
COVER PAGE PDF
TABLE OF CONTENTS WordPerfect |             PDF
INTRODUCTION WordPerfect |             PDF
LIST OF STATISTICAL TABLES WordPerfect |             PDF
GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTES ON TERMS AND METHODS WordPerfect |             PDF
TABLE SET I:  STATISTICAL OVERVIEW WordPerfect |             PDF
TABLE SET II:  THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS WordPerfect |             PDFOffenses:  Explanatory Notes For Table Set II.B 
WordPerfect
 |             
PDF
Victims:  Explanatory Notes For Table Set II.C 
WordPerfect
 |             
PDF
TABLE SET III:  THE REVIEW COMMITTEE WordPerfect |             PDFOffenses:  Explanatory Notes For Table Set III.B 
WordPerfect
 |             
PDF
Victims:  Explanatory Notes For Table Set III.C 
WordPerfect
 |             
PDF
TABLE SET IV:  THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WordPerfect |             PDFOffenses:  Explanatory Notes For Table Set IV.B 
WordPerfect
 |             
PDF
Victims:  Explanatory Notes For Table Set IV.C 
WordPerfect
 |             
PDF
TABLE SET V:  FEDERAL DEFENDANTS SENTENCED TO DEATH WordPerfect |             PDF
TABLE SET VI:  AGREEMENTS AND DISAGREEMENTS        IN THE FEDERAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESS WordPerfect |             PDF
#### § 3427.0-1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to set out the protection that shall be afforded qualified surface owners of split estate lands (43 CFR 3400.0-5) and the requirements for submission of evidence of written surface owner consent from qualified surface owners of split estate lands.

[47 FR 33142, July 30, 1982]
§ 41.430 Financial assistance. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, in providing financial assistance to any of its students, a recipient shall not: ( 1 ) On the basis of sex, provide different amounts or types of such assistance, limit eligibility for such assistance that is of any particular type or source, apply different criteria, or otherwise discriminate;
( 2 ) Through solicitation, listing, approval, provision of facilities, or other services, assist any foundation, trust, agency, organization, or person that provides assistance to any of such recipient's students in a manner that discriminates on the basis of sex; or
( 3 ) Apply any rule or assist in application of any rule concerning eligibility for such assistance that treats persons of one sex differently from persons of the other sex with regard to marital or parental status.
( b ) *Financial aid established by certain legal instruments.* ( 1 ) A recipient may administer or assist in the administration of scholarships, fellowships, or other forms of financial assistance established pursuant to domestic or foreign wills, trusts, bequests, or similar legal instruments or by acts of a foreign government that require that awards be made to members of a particular sex specified therein; *Provided,* that the overall effect of the award of such sex-restricted scholarships, fellowships, and other forms of financial assistance does not discriminate on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) To ensure nondiscriminatory awards of assistance as required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, recipients shall develop and use procedures under which: ( i ) Students are selected for award of financial assistance on the basis of nondiscriminatory criteria and not on the basis of availability of funds restricted to members of a particular sex;
( ii ) An appropriate sex-restricted scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance is allocated to each student selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section; and
( iii ) No student is denied the award for which he or she was selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section because of the absence of a scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance designated for a member of that student's sex.
( c ) *Athletic scholarships.* ( 1 ) To the extent that a recipient awards athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid, it must provide reasonable opportunities for such awards for members of each sex in proportion to the number of students of each sex participating in interscholastic or intercollegiate athletics.
( 2 ) A recipient may provide separate athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid for members of each sex as part of separate athletic teams for members of each sex to the extent consistent with this paragraph (c) and § 41.450.
No. 14,604.

#### Townsend *v.*Heath et al.

(103 P. [2d] 691)

Decided June 10, 1940.

*274Mr. Harry S. Class, Mr. Douglas A. Roller, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendants in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Burke

delivered the opinion of the court.

These parties appeared in reverse order in the trial court and are hereinafter designated as there, or by name.

This was an action on an oral contract to pay a commission for the procurement of capital to develop mining properties. It was dismissed as to all except the present plaintiff in error against whom a judgment was entered for something over $7,000, and to review that judgment he prosecutes this writ. Of the sixteen assignments we find it necessary to consider only the second which is, in substance, that the suit was upon a joint liability and the discharge of three of the alleged promisors discharged the fourth.

Two of the original defendants were corporations, the other was Harry Lee Townsend. The allegations are— “That said defendants had no money of their own with which to carry on said development and operations. * * * That said defendants and each of them, during the month of March, A.D. 1933, made and entered into an oral agreement with the plaintiffs * * *. That said defendants and each of them agreed to pay to the plaintiffs * * *. That subsequently said defendants obtained for their purpose as hereinabove set forth [certain specified sums on certain given dates] * * *. That the sum of Seven Thousand One Hundred Ninety-six and 97/100 dollars ($7,196.97), was due to said plaintiffs by said *275defendants and each of them * * * Wherefore, plaintiffs pray judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants and each of them.” On the trial the plaintiffs were both represented by the same attorneys and the defendants by the same attorneys. When both sides had rested counsel for defendants moved to dismiss as to all. The motion was granted save as to R. E. L. Townsend, and to the refusal to dismiss as to him his counsel excepted. No other objections were made to that order and the cause was submitted without argument. The point raised by said assignment No. 2 was raised by motion for a new trial. The court specifically found that there was no evidence to hold the dismissed defendants.

Said assignment No. 2 seems to be supported by the common law and all the precedents in adjudicated cases. 33 C.J., p. 1111, § 65; Restatement of the Law — Contracts, p. 135, §118; *Heckman v. Manning,*4 Colo. 543; *Whitescarver v. Waldo,*69 Colo. 356, 194 Pac. 618. We have held that certain statutory provisions varying the general rule in this jurisdiction have no application to. oral contracts. *Exchange Bank v. Ford,*7 Colo. 314, 3 Pac. 449, construing section 1834, General Statutes 1883, being section 4, chapter 92, ’35 C.S.A., and section 14 of the Code, being section 13, chapter 1, volume 1, ’35 C.S.A.

The judgment is accordingly reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss at plaintiffs’ costs.

Mr. Justice Young and Mr. Justice Knous concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF MALCOLM POLLARD, INC.





MALCOLM L. POLLARD,Inc.


4845 W. LAKE ROAD, # 119


ERIE, PA 16505




(814)838-8258                                FAX (814838-8452











April 14, 2011





Board of Directors


Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc.


2375 E. Tropicana Ave., #8-259


Las Vegas, Nevada 89119





Gentlemen:





We hereby consent to the use of our audit report of Global Entertainment Holdings for the year ended December 31, 2009, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.











/s/ Malcolm Pollard, Inc.


Malcolm Pollard, CPA
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
BankUnited Financial Corporation, a Florida corporation (the Company), for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on or about the date hereof (the
Report), I, Alfred R. Camner, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
|                       
|/s/ Alfred R. Camner   
|Alfred R. Camner       

Dated: August 9, 2007
#### § 3910.23 Requirements for conducting exploration activities.

Exploration activities on Federal lands require an exploration license or oil shale lease. Activities on a license or lease without an approved plan of operation must be conducted pursuant to an approved exploration plan under § 3931.40 of this chapter. The licensee may not remove any oil shale for sale, but may remove a reasonable amount of oil shale for analysis and study.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULES
13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Randall T. Mays, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Clear Channel
Communications, Inc.;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: August 4, 2004 /s/ RANDALL T. MAYSRandall T. MaysExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
### Subpart A—General Requirement

Sec.
6011.
General requirement of return, statement, or list.
M&I 2002 Sch B-6 F.Z06.XLS

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF FY 2002 ALLOCATED M&I CONVEYANCE EXPENSE

2004 M&I WATER RATES

Total Ratio of A/F 

Facility/Contractor A/F 1/ by Contractor Black Butte D & R

County of ColusaElk Creek CSDWhitney Const.

Total BB D & R

Clear Creek Unit

Clear Creek CSD

Contra Costa Canal

Contra Costa WD

Cow Creek Unit

Bella Vista WD

Cross Valley Canal

County of FresnoCounty of Tulare

Total CV Canal

Delta-Mendota Canal

City of TracyDel Puerto WDDepartment of VAPanoche WD - DMCPlain View WDSan Luis WD - DMC

Total DM Canal

Folsom D & R

City of RosevilleEl Dorado ID - FD&RSan Juan Suburban WD

Total Folsom D & R

Folsom-South Canal

East Bay MUDSacramento MUD 28 1.000000 

28 1.000000 

6/30/2003
M&I 2002 Sch B-6 F.Z06.XLS 

6/30/2003 

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF FY 2002 ALLOCATED M&I CONVEYANCE EXPENSE

2004 M&I WATER RATES

Total Ratio of A/F 

Facility/Contractor A/F 1/ by Contractor Friant Dam

County of MaderaFresno County WW #18

Total Friant Dam

Friant-Kern Canal

Arvin-Edison WSD

City of FresnoCity of LindsayCity of Orange CoveLindsay-Strathmore IDShafter-Wasco IDTerra Bella ID

Total FK Canal

Sacramento River

City of Redding - SRCity of West SacramentoDiamond Lands Corp.Lake California P.O.A.Riverview Golf & CC

Total Sacramento River

San Felipe Unit

SB County WD - IBSC Valley WD - IB

Total SF Unit

San Luis Canal - Fresno

City of AvenalCity of CoalingaCity of HuronState of CAWestlands WD

Total SLC - Fresno

San Luis Canal - Tracy

Broadview WDPacheco WD - SLCPanoche WD - SLCSan Luis WD - SLC

Total SLC - Tracy
M&I 2002 Sch B-6 F.Z06.XLS

6/30/2003

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF FY 2002 ALLOCATED M&I CONVEYANCE EXPENSE

2004 M&I WATER RATES

Total Ratio of A/F 

Facility/Contractor A/F 1/ by Contractor Shasta Dam

Centerville CSDMountain Gate CSDShasta CWA 

Total Shasta Dam

Sly Park

El Dorado ID - SP

Spring Creek Conduit

City of Redding - SCCShasta County #25Shasta CSD

Total SC Conduit

Sugar Pine Reservoir

Foresthill PUD

Tehama-Colusa Canal

Colusa-County WD

Toyon Pipeline

City of Redding - TPCity of Shasta Lake 2/US Forest Service

Total Toyon Pipeline

GRAND TOTAL 28 1.000000 

FOOTNOTES

1/ All costs are to be directly billed other than for those to be directly paid by the Folsom-South Canal users.

2/ Per letter of agreement, dated 3/17/92, it has been determined that contractor does its own conveyance O&M.Source: 

(1) Deliveries - M&I 2002 Sch B-2 P.Z06.XLS(2) Conveyance Expenses to be allocated - M&I 2002 Sch B-7 P.Z06.XLS 

I:\wtrates\RATES\2004\M&I\[M&I 2002 Sch B-6 F.Z06.XLS]OUTPUT
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General
Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures Inc.





|Date: March 30, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|-------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                     |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
### §4484. Cross references

**(1) For penalties and administrative provisions applicable to this subchapter, see subtitle F.**

**(2) For exemption for uses by Indian tribal governments (or their subdivisions), see section 7871.**

(Added June 29, 1956, ch. 462, title II, §206(a), 70 Stat. 391; amended Pub. L. 97–473, title II, §202(b)(10), Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2610.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 97–473 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1983 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 97–473, see section 204(5) of Pub. L. 97–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 7871 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective June 29, 1956, see section 211 of act June 29, 1956, set out as an Effective Date of 1956 Amendment note under section 4041 of this title.
### §566c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 99–398, §5, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 850, which related to hunting, fishing, trapping, and water rights, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
----

----

I Comunicazioni

Consiglio

----

Informazione sulla proroga dell'accordo internazionale sui legni tropicali del 1994

(2005/C 237/01)

Nella sua 34a sessione (Panama, 12-16 maggio 2003), il Consiglio internazionale dei legni tropicali ha deciso, ai sensi dell'articolo 46, paragrafo 2 dell'accordo internazionale sui legni tropicali del 1994 (1), di prorogare l'accordo per un periodo di tre anni dal 1o gennaio 2004 al 31 dicembre 2006.

----

(1)GU L 208 del 17.8.1996, pag. 1.

----

Commissione

----

Tassi di cambio dell'euro (1)

26 settembre 2005

(2005/C 237/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Fonte: tassi di cambio di riferimento pubblicati dalla Banca centrale europea.

----

----

Modalità di trasmissione elettronica delle notifiche degli aiuti di Stato, indirizzi compresi, e disposizioni per garantire la protezione delle informazioni riservate

Articolo 3, paragrafo 6 del regolamento (CE) n. 794/2004 della Commissione, del 21 aprile 2004, recante disposizioni di esecuzione del regolamento (CE) n. 659/1999 del Consiglio recante modalità di applicazione dell'articolo 93 del trattato CE

(2005/C 237/03)

(Testo rilevante ai fini del SEE)

----

----

Notifica preventiva di una concentrazione

(Caso n. COMP/M.3984 — Bain Fund Group/FCI)

Caso ammissibile alla procedura semplificata

(2005/C 237/04)

(Testo rilevante ai fini del SEE)

----

(1)GU L 24 del 29.1.2004, pag. 1.

(2)GU C 56 del 5.3.2005, pag. 32.

----

----

Non opposizione ad un'operazione di concentrazione notificata

(Caso n. COMP/M.3921 — Advent/Herlitz)

(2005/C 237/05)

(Testo rilevante ai fini del SEE)

Il 19/09/2005 la Commissione ha deciso di non opporsi alla suddetta operazione di concentrazione notificata e di dichiararla compatibile con il mercato comune. La decisione si basa sull'articolo 6, paragrafo 1, lettera b), del regolamento (CE) n. 139/2004 del Consiglio. Il testo integrale della decisione è disponibile unicamente in lingua tedesco e verrà reso pubblico dopo che gli eventuali segreti commerciali in esso contenuti saranno stati espunti. Il testo della decisione sarà disponibile:

----

Rettifiche

----

Rettifica dell'invito a presentare proposte (n. VIII-2006/01) Linea di bilancio 4020 «Finanziamento dei partiti politici europei»

(Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea C 141 del 10 giugno 2005)

(2005/C 237/06)

A pagina 22, punto 4.3, lettera e):

anziché:

«Versamento di un anticipo dell'80 % (15 giorni dopo la firma della convenzione)»,

leggi:

«Versamento di un prefinanziamento del 50 % (15 giorni dopo la firma della convenzione)».

----
#### § 4.316 Remands from courts.

Whenever any matter is remanded from any Federal court to the Board for further proceedings, the Board will remand the matter to an administrative law judge, an Indian probate judge, or BIA. In the alternative, to the extent the court's directive and time limitations permit, the parties will be allowed an opportunity to submit to the Board a report recommending procedures for it to follow to comply with the court's order. The Board will enter special orders governing matters on remand.