alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
3.5




AMENDMENT
OF CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF SERIES CCONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK




Ross
Miller
 Secretary
of state
 204 N
Carson St Ste1
 Carson
City Nevada 89701-4299
 775-684-5708
 Website:
www.nvsos.gov
  Certificate
of Amendment
 (Pursuant
to NRS 78.385 and 78.390)
  Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
 For
Nevada Profit Corporations
 (Pursuant
to NRS 78.385 and 78.390- after issuance of stock)
  
 1. Name of
corporation:
 Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
 2. The
articles have been amended as follows (provide article number, if
available)
 Article
No. 4
 Section
1. Authorized Shares
 The Board
of Directors authorizes the issuance of and the designation and preferences and
relative participating, optimal, and other special rights and qualifications,
limitations and restrictions of a series of Preferred Stock consisting of six
million five hundred thousand (6,500,000) shares, $0.001 par value, to be
designated “Series C Convertible Preferred Stock” (the Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock).
 
 3. The vote
by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to
exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of
the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series,
or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation* have
voted in favor of the amendment is 58.7%
 4. Effective
date of filing (optional)    11/8/08
 5. Signature
(require)
  /s/ Terry
Gabby
 *If any
proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative or other
right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment
must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote otherwise
required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power
of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless to limitations or
restrictions on the voting power thereof.
 
 IMPORTANT:
Failure to include any of the above information and submit with the proper fees
may cause this filing to be rejected.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Eric MACIAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-40055.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

John Eric Macias, Federal Correctional Institution Talladega, Talladega, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*334PER CURIAM: *

Counsel representing John Eric Macias has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Macias has not filed a response to the motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §967a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–717, §1, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1114, which related to per capita distribution out of funds appropriated to pay a certain judgment to tribal members living on Nov. 2, 1966, and use of balance of funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §772. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1085, §2, 68 Stat. 979, which authorized per capita payments to tribal members for certain judgments against the United States and exempted such payments from Federal tax, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### PART I—DESIGNATION

Sec.
1391.
Designation procedure.
1392.
Eligibility criteria.
1393.
Definitions and special rules.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code),  each
of the undersigned  officers of Wien Group,  Inc., a New York  corporation  (the
"Company"),  do hereby  certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company
on Form  10-KSB for the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  2005,  as filed with the
Securities & Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that:

         (1)      the 10-KSB  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
                  sections  13(a) and 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
                  1934; and,

         (2)      the   information   contained  in  the  10-KSB  Report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: September 23, 2005
                                             BY: /S/ STEPHEN S. WIEN
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    STEPHEN S. WIEN,
                                    Chief Executive Officer &
                                    Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10920 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DEMITRIUS TASHIA PRINTERS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-287-6

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Demitrius Tashia Printers raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Johns , 625 F.2d 1175, 1176 (5th Cir. 1980), which held that F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11 is inapplicable to probation-revocation hearings. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19

- 0407

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. MICHAEL BRANDON BREAREY,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s sixth motion for an extension of time to file his opening brief

, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 1 7 , 20 20 , within which to file Appellant’s opening brief on app eal. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 11 2020

03/11/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0407
#### § 3862.4-1 Newspaper publication.

Upon the receipt of applications for mineral patent and accompanying papers, if no reason appears for rejecting the application, the authorized officer will, at the expense of the claimant (who must furnish the agreement of the publisher to hold applicant for patent alone responsible for charges of publication), publish a notice of such application for the period of 60 days in a newspaper published nearest to the claim. If the notice is published in a daily paper, it shall be published in the Wednesday issue for nine consecutive weeks; if weekly, in nine consecutive issues; if semiweekly or triweekly, in the issue of the same day of each week for nine consecutive weeks. In all cases the first day of issues shall be excluded in estimating the period of 60 days.

[35 FR 9756, June 13, 1970, as amended at 41 FR 21642, May 27, 1976]
#### HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. JJ, b/n/f Romona E, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-20327.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 10, 2006.

Jeffrey L. Rogers, Kristi Michelle Herring, Feldman *&*Rogers, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Daniel L McCall, Katy, TX, for Defendan1>-Appellee.

Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-Appellant, Houston Independent School District, appeals the district court’s order awarding attorneys fees and costs to Defendant-Appellee, JJ, b/n/f Romona E, arguing that the district court erred in concluding that defendant was substantially justified in rejecting plaintiffs settlement offer and did not unreasonably protract the final resolution of the parties’ dispute. *See*20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(3)(D)-(F). The district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the defendant was substantially justified in rejecting the settlement offer. The order *912of the. district court is accordingly AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 30 DAY ACCUM MEAN 30 DAY AVG MEAN

1 320 296 307 307 307

2 334 287 310 617 309

3 315 250 273 890 297

4 269 204 239 1,129 282

5 246 209 224 1,353 271

6 229 169 199 1,552 259

7 271 191 243 1,795 256

8 302 217 261 2,056 257

9 0 0 0 2,056 228

10 0 0 0 2,056 206

11 0 0 0 2,056 187

12 0 0 0 2,056 171

13 262 193 223 2,279 175

14 301 232 255 2,534 181

15 345 306 324 2,858 191

16 344 294 313 3,171 198

17 304 281 294 3,465 204

18 331 307 320 3,785 210

19 321 272 293 4,078 215

20 275 243 258 4,336 217

21 294 262 282 4,618 220

22 301 241 270 4,888 222

23 275 250 261 5,149 224

24 294 260 278 5,427 226

25 302 275 289 5,716 229

26 278 213 238 5,954 229

27 273 252 263 6,217 230

28 303 272 289 6,506 232

29 336 306 324 6,830 236

30 374 336 359 7,189 240

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Vernalis On The San Joaquin River

Period: September 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
#### John D’Amore, an Infant, by Alfonso D’Amore, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Harold Hanson et al., Respondents.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and MeCurn, JJ.
#### Jennie A. Parkton, Appellant, v. James J. Freeman et al., as Executors of Celia Edelman, Deceased, Respondents.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Appeal from judgments dismissing the complaint and from orders denying motions to set aside the verdict of the jury and for a new trial. Judgments and orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 801.]
#### Ivy I. Gaffney, as Administratrix of the Estate of Archibald A. Gaffney, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. United Taxi Service of Lynbrook, Inc., Repondent, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Emma H. Rand et al., Appellants, v. United Taxi Service of Lynbrook, Inc., Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Under the circumstances disclosed, the denial of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Grossaverage hourly earnings of production workers by industry (in dollars).
 
SuDoc Number:L 2.2:EA 7/ | L 2.61/12:
Item Number:0769 | 0771-B-05
CGP System Number:000650623
 
2003:
September
2004:
February
2005:
January
2006: 
January
2007:
January
 
October
 
March
 
February
 
February
 
February
 
November
 
April
 
March
 
March
 
March
 
December
 
May
 
April
 
April
 
April
 
 
 
June
 
May
 
May
 
May
 
 
 
July
 
June
 
June
 
June
 
 
 
August
 
July
 
July
 
July
 
 
 
October
 
August
 
August
 
October
 
 
 
December
 
September
 
September
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
October
 
October
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
November
 
November
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December
 
December
 
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 1, 2017********
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 10-0855

((((((((((((((((

In Re Jeffrey Cook, Relator

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1. This case is ABATED pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2.

2.This case is removed from this Court’s active docket until further order of this Court.  The parties shall timely notify this Court of all events affecting the status of this case, including when the successor judge has ruled in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b).  The parties shall file either a status report or a motion to dismiss by December 21, 2010.

Done at the City of Austin, this 22nd day of October, 2010.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
### Subpart A—Effects on Recipients

Sec.
331.
Gain or loss to shareholder in corporate liquidations.
332.
Complete liquidations of subsidiaries.
[333.
Repealed.]
334.
Basis of property received in liquidations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title VI, §631(e)(16), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2275, struck out item 333 "Election as to recognition of gain in certain liquidations".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BANK UNITED, FSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,486
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,403
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    133,906
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          90,165
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,489,465
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,807,192
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,100,923
<SHORT-TERM>                                   447,259
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             41,595
<LONG-TERM>                                    116,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         30
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,807,192
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 64,405
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,527
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                73,932
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              34,823
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,013
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           23,919
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      695
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,027
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,027
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.48
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,806
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,887
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,875
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       78
<RECOVERIES>                                        44
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,121
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### City of Little Falls, Respondent, v. John C. Reardon et al., Defendants, and Little Falls National Bank, Defendant-Appellant.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
### §577. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 27, 1939, ch. 387, §7, 53 Stat. 1130, which related to liability of judgment funds for debts, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe series Bi2Sr2Ca(n-1) Cu(n)O(2n+4) (1 less than or equal to n less than or equal to 5): Phase stability and superconducting propertiesPhase relations at 850 and 870 C, melting transitions in air, oxygen, and helium were studied for Bi(2.1)Sr(1.9) CuO6 and for the Bi2Sr2Ca(n-1) Cu(n)O(2n+4) for n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and infinity (CaCuO2). Up to 870 C, the n = 2 composition resides in the compatibility tetrahedron bounded by Bi(2+x)(Sr,Ca)(3-y) Cu2O8, (Sr,Ca)14 Cu24O41, Ca2CuO3, and a Bi-Sr-Ca-O phase. The n is greater than or equal to 3 compositions reside in the compatibility tetrahedron Bi(2+x)(Sr,Ca)(3-y) Cu2O8 - (Sr,Ca)14 Cu24O41 - Ca2CuO3 - CuO up to 850 C. However, Bi(2+x)Sr(4-y) Cu3O10 forms for n is greater than or equal to 3 after extended heating at 870 C. Bi(2+x)Sr(2-y) CuO6 and Bi(2+x)(Sr,Ca)(3-y) Cu2O8 melt in air at 914 C and 895 C respectively. During melting, all of the compositions studied lose 1 to 2 percent by weight of oxygen from the reduction of copper. Bi(2+x)Sr(2-y) CuO6, Bi(2+n)(Sr,Ca)(3-y) Cu2O8, and Bi(2+x)(Sr,Ca)(4-y) Cu3O10 exhibit crystallographic alignment in a magnetic field, with the c-axes orienting parallel to the field.Document ID19910012597Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsDeguire, Mark R.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Bansal, Narottam P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Farrell, David E.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Finan, Valerie*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Kim, Cheol J.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Hills, Bethanie J.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Allen, Christopher J.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategorySolid-State PhysicsReport/Patent NumberE-6000NASA-TM-103749NAS 1.15:103749Meeting InformationMeeting: Annual Meeting of the American Ceramic SocietyLocation: Indianapolis, INCountry: United StatesStart Date: April 23, 1989End Date: April 27, 1989Accession Number91N21910Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 307-51-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012597.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 686.535 Are Job Corps centers required to maintain a student accountability system?

Yes, each Job Corps center must establish and implement an effective system to account for and document the daily whereabouts, participation, and status of students during their Job Corps enrollment. The system must enable center staff to detect and respond to instances of unauthorized or unexplained student absence. Each center must operate its student accountability system according to requirements and procedures issued by the Secretary.
Zimbra 

### Zimbra

Re: Parcel Question From 

### :Russ Maguire, A.A.E. ,ACE 

### <rmaguire@norwoodma.gov> Subject: 

### Re: Parcel Question To :Barry Hammer <Barry.Hammer@faa.gov> Cc : 

### mryan <mryan@norwoodma.gov> Hi Barry , Page 1 of2 

### rmaguire@norwoodma.gov



### Thu, Jul 26, 2012 03:31 PM

Yes , you ' re correct . The attached file shows a parcel of land that is not on Norwood Memorial Airpo rt ' s Exhibit A . The illustrated parcel is actually west of the parcel which the Norwood Airport Commission is currently using as an auto storage lot ; and it is this auto storage parcel which is on our Exhibit A, and which we ' re now seeking a formal release for nonaeronautical use . As an aside : I ' ve copied on this e - mail Mark Ryan , who is the Town of Norwood Engineer and Vice - Chairman of the Norwood Airport Commission . Russ

----- Original Message ----- From: " Barry Hammer " <Barry . Hammer@faa . gov> To : rmaguire@norwoodma . gov Sent : Thursday , July 26 , 2 012 2 : 46 : 02 PM GMT - 05 : 00 US/Canada Eastern Subject : Parcel Question Russ , I took a look at the parcel that you requested the release for and I believe it ' s a different parcel (though in the same vicinity) as the one the town inquired about . I ' ve attached a plan highlighting the parcel the town asked about selling . Let me know if you think it ' s airport property? Again , it doesn ' t appear so by the Exhibit 'A ', but I want to make sure you know what ' s going on . I ' m traveling tomorrow , but will be available Monday and Tuesday next week if you ' d like to talk . Regards , Barry J . Hammer , P . E . https:/ /ncs.norwoodma.gov/h/printmessage?id= 1761 7&tz=America/New

_York 4/26/2015Zimbra Page 2 of2 FAA Airports Division 12 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803 781 . 238.7625 Russ Maguire, A.A . E. , ACE Manager , Norwood Memorial Airport Business phone (781) 255-5616

https:/ /ncs.norwoodma.gov/h/printmessage?id=17617&tz=America/New_York 4/26/2015