alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ISAAC WILSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3492

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 15, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Terry P. Lewis, Judge.

Michael J. Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, and Isaac Wilson, pro se, 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
---

Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Alberta Star Development Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stuart Rogers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (3)

   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(4)

   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/Stuart RogersStuart RogersChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive OfficerApril 5, 2013 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.


---
Skip to content

# Social Security

Search
Menu
Languages
Sign in / up

## Public Policy Home

- POMS Home Page
- POMS Table of Contents
- POMS Recent Changes
- Emergency Messages
- Chief Judge Bulletins
- Instruction Title Lists
- SSA Program Rules

### POMS Home

This section of the SSA Program Policy Information Site contains the public version of the Program Operations Manual System (POMS).  The POMS is a primary source of information used by Social Security employees to process claims for Social Security benefits.  The public version of POMS is identical to the version used by Social Security employees except that it does not include internal data entry and sensitive content instructions.

Please note that this document is intended for SSA employees.  It contains technical terms and instructions that will be unfamiliar to you.  If you have difficulty understanding these materials, please click on this link to the Social Security Handbook, which is written in plain language for use by the public.

#### Page Contents

              - Table of Contents  - Browse to find information.
              - Recent Changes  - Recent updates that have been incorporated into the Program Operations Manual System (POMS); the individual transmittals include a Background and a Summary of Changes.
              - Help  - Links for assistance with using POMS.

#### Important Information:

          - Accessibility
          - FOIA
          - Open Government
          - Glossary
          - Privacy
          - Report Fraud, Waste or Abuse
          - Site Map
          - Website Policies

#### Other Government Websites:

          - Benefits.gov
          - Disability.gov
          - Healthcare.gov
          - MyMoney.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Other Government Sites

#### Follow:

          - Twitter
          - Facebook
          - YouTube
          - Blog
          - More Social Media

This website is produced and published at U.S. taxpayer expense.
(June 21, 1943.)

#### In the Matter of the Application of Samuel H. Crohn for Reinstatement as an Attorney.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 21-10625

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:20-cr-00022-MW-MJF-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

JOSHUA GARDEN, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(August 24, 2021)

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

USCA11 Case: 21-10625 Date Filed: 08/24/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2

Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Joshua Garden in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant 

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our 

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the 

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire 

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Garden’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 21-10625 Date Filed: 08/24/2021 Page: 2 of 2
#### William W. Farley, as State Commissioner of Excise of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Henry Sulger and The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Respondents.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
# OUTPUT

Schedule A-12Page &P of &N
§ 3513.17 How will BLM implement a reduction of rental, royalties, or minimum production? ( a ) The BLM may reduce rental, royalties, or minimum production on its own initiative if the BLM determines, based on available information, that it is necessary to promote development of the mineral resource. Such a reduction may be for a specific geographic area, or on an industry-wide basis.
( b ) The BLM may reduce rental, royalties, or minimum production in response to an application submitted under § 3513.15 if the application meets the criteria in § 3513.12.
( c ) The BLM may grant a reduction not to exceed: ( 1 ) 10 years from the date of implementation under paragraph (a) of this section, or
( 2 ) 10 years from the date of the decision to approve the application submitted under paragraph (b) of this section, or for a maximum quantity of mineral production as determined by the BLM.
[85 FR 67680, Oct. 26, 2020]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 500.53

 500.77

 500.62

 501.25

 501.69

 501.85

 501.49

 501.38

 501.53

 501.19

 501.25

 501.28

 501.41

 501.32

 501.16

 501.14

 501.08

 501.07

 501.11

 500.98

 501.03

 501.04

 501.04

 501.02

 501.00

 501.01

 500.92

 500.84

 500.74

 500.79

 55,878

 56,138

 55,975

 56,663

 57,148

 57,325

 56,927

 56,806

 56,972

 56,597

 56,663

 56,696

 56,839

 56,740

 56,563

 56,541

 56,475

 56,464

 56,508

 56,365

 56,420

 56,431

 56,431

 56,409

 56,387

 56,398

 56,300

 56,214

 56,105

 56,159

STORAGE

-249

+260

-163

+688

+485

+177

-398

-121

+166

-375

+66

+33

+143

-99

-177

-22

-66

-11

+44

-143

+55

+11

+0

-22

-22

+11

-98

-86

-109

+54

CHANGE

1,017

1,271

782

881

699

451

100

244

388

113

518

505

553

441

403

474

453

483

517

422

522

511

523

512

517

547

492

498

484

565

INFLOW

 1,136

 1,132

 856

 528

 449

 355

 293

 296

 296

 295

 479

 482

 481

 485

 488

 481

 481

 484

 490

 490

 490

 500

 518

 518

 524

 536

 541

 538

 538

 538

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 7

 8

 8

 6

 5

 7

 8

 9

 8

 7

 6

 6

 0

 6

 4

 4

 5

 5

 5

 4

 4

 5

 5

 5

 4

 5

 0

 3

 1

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2019 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/01/2019

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +32 15,886 15,718 0 0 150

ACRE-FEET +32 31,510 31,177 0 0 298

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 31,177

SPILL 0 31,177

 56,127

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,169

 1,265

 825

 874

 679

 450

 111

 237

 388

 109

 513

 502

 570

 438

 409

 471

 450

 483

 492

 428

 518

 518

 528

 508

 518

 531

 476

 477

 488

 550

 15,975

 31,686

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
Exhibit
      32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF
      2002







I,
      David
      Bakhshi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Latin American Telecommunications Venture Company-LATVCO on Form 10-QSB for
      the
      quarterly period ended February 29, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of Latin American
      Telecommunications Venture Company-LATVCO.





By:
      /s/
      David Bakhshi


Name:
      David Bakhshi


Title:
      Chief Executive Officer




April
      	14,
      2008
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAYIDEN HUSSEIN MOHAMED,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

BELLINGER, Nurse Supervisor ; STEWART ANDREWS, M.D.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 35710

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv

- 01669

- RAJ

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 26, 2017 **

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Sayiden Hussein Mohamed, a former inmate at Snohomish County Jail,

appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical need. We have

jurisd iction under 2 8 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung , 391

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 6 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 35710

F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We may affirm on any basis supported by the

record. Enlow v. Salem

- Keizer Yellow Cab Co ., 389 F.3d 802, 811 (9th Cir. 2004).

We affirm.

Summa ry judgment was proper because under any potent ially applicable

standard, Mohamed failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether

defendants knew of and disregarded an excessive risk to Mohamed ’s health

. See

Toguchi , 391 F.3d at 1057

- 58 (neither a prison er’ s difference of opinion

concerning the course of treatment nor mere negligence in treating a medical

condition amounts to deliberate indifference); Lolli v. County of Orange , 351 F.3d

410, 41 8

- 1 9 (9t h Cir. 2003) (pretrial detainee’ s claim of medical deliberate

indifference is analyzed under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause

rather than under the Eighth Amendment, but same standards apply); see also

Castro v. County of Los Angeles , 833 F.3d 1060, 1067

- 71 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc)

(setting forth elements of Fourteenth Amendment failure

- to

- prot ect claim by

pretrial detainee).

Denial of Mohamed’s motion for appoint ment of counsel was proper

because Mohamed failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances

. See Palmer v.

Valdez , 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (setting forth standard of review and

exceptional circumstances requirement for appointment of counsel).

We reject Mohamed’s contention that he should have been appointed an3 16

- 35710

interpreter because Mohamed did not make such a request before the district court

.

AFFIRMED.
#### Luis Di Fabrizzio et al., Respondents, v. Edward D. Clarity, Appellant.

On the court’s own motion, the decision of this court handed down December 1, 1947 *(ante,*p. 769), is amended to read as follows: Action to recover damages for the unauthorized use by defendant, a photographer, of pictures of plaintiffs for trade purposes. Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, *776affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. *(Holmes*v. *TJnderwood é Underwood, Inc.,*225 App. Div. 360.) Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
§ 41.225 Educational institutions eligible to submit transition plans. ( a ) *Application.* This section applies to each educational institution to which §§ 41.300 through 41.310 apply that: ( 1 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1972; or
( 2 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1965, but thereafter admitted, as regular students, students of the sex not admitted prior to June 23, 1965.
( b ) *Provision for transition plans.* An educational institution to which this section applies shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 41.300 through 41.310.
EXHIBIT 12  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES





(In thousands, except ratio data)





Three Months Ended March 31,


Year Ended2002

2001


2001


2000

1999

1998

1997Income (loss) before income taxes, equity in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates and extraordinary item

148,600

(365,388
)

(1,259,390
)

688,384

220,213

117,922

104,077Dividends and other received from nonconsolidated affiliates

1,036

3,319


7,426


4,934

7,079

9,168

4,624Total

149,636

(362,069
)

(1,251,964
)

693,318

227,292

127,090

108,701Fixed ChargesInterest expense

111,510

156,400


575,057


413,425

192,321

135,766

75,076Amortization of loan fees

3,256

4,082


14,648


12,401

1,970

2,220

1,451Interest portion of rentals

66,136

46,233


233,353


150,317

24,511

16,044

6,120Total fixed charges

180,902

206,715


823,058


576,143

218,802

154,030

82,647Preferred stock dividendsTax effect of preferred dividends















After tax preferred dividends















Total fixed charges and preferred dividends

180,902

206,715


823,058


576,143

218,802

154,030

82,647Total earnings available for payment of fixed charges

330,538

(155,354
)

(428,906
)

1,269,461

446,094

281,120

191,348Ratio of earnings to fixed Charges

1.83

(.75
)

(.52
)

2.20

2.04

1.83

2.32Rental fees and charges

188,959

132,094


666,724


429,476

306,393

200,550

76,500Interest rate

35%

35%


35%


35%

8%

8%

8%
Exhibit 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Internet Commerce Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter
M. Psztur, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




/s/ Walter M. Psztur
------------------------
Walter M. Psztur
Chief Financial Officer
December 13, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Rutkowski, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction affirmed. All concur, except Larkin, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crimes of robbery, first degree, and grand larceny, first degree.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
#### Samuel T. Nierenberg et al., Respondents, v. Leopold Heffner et al., Appellants.

Order, entered May 14, 1947, so far as appealed from by the individual defendants, and order, entered May 14, 1947, so far as appealed from by the corporate defendant, unanimously affirmed, each with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Settle orders on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
### §341. Power to grant rights-of-way not affected

Nothing in this act shall be so construed as to affect the right and power of Congress to grant the right of way through any lands granted to an Indian, or a tribe of Indians, for railroads or other highways, or telegraph lines, for the public use, or to condemn such lands to public uses, upon making just compensation.

(Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, §10, 24 Stat. 391.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This act, referred to in text, is act Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, 24 Stat. 388, and is popularly known as the Indian General Allotment Act. For classification of this act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 331 of this title and Tables.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-21885-CIV-COOKE/GOODMAN

ANTONIO HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING 

CASE ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

THIS MATTER comes before me on the Defense Counsel’s Telephonic Notice of 

Settlement received in Chambers on December 7, 2021. The parties have conditionally settled 

this matter, and it will be administratively closed pending the parties filing a stipulation of final

dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) or moving for dismissal under

Rule 41(a)(2).

A stipulation of final dismissal, or a motion for dismissal, must be filed within 45 days of 

this Order. In the event a stipulation of final dismissal is filed under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the parties desire the Court to have continuing jurisdiction to 

enforce the terms of the settlement agreement, they must condition the stipulation on this Court 

entering an order retaining jurisdiction. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 

(11th Cir. 2012). The Clerk is directed to administratively CLOSE this case. All pending motions

are DENIED as moot. And all pending/upcoming hearing dates are CANCELED. 

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Miami, Florida, this 7th day of December

2021. 

Copies provided to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-21885-MGC Document 68 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2021 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     MACAW CAPITAL, INC.  March 31, 1997 financial statements and is 
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894542
<NAME>                        MACAW CAPITAL, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4885 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4885

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, to 
            reauthorize the Missing Americans Alert Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kevin and Avonte's Law 
Reauthorization Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE MISSING AMERICANS ALERT PROGRAM.

    Section 240001(d) of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement 
Act of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 12621(d)) is amended by striking ``2018 through 
2022'' and inserting ``2023 through 2027''.

            Passed the Senate September 22, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4885

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, to 
            reauthorize the Missing Americans Alert Program.
```
### §5804. Regulations

Not later than 180 days after October 20, 2020, the Secretary shall promulgate regulations to implement the program.

(Pub. L. 116–174, §5, Oct. 20, 2020, 134 Stat. 847.)