alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 479 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate advance refunding 

bonds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2021 

Mr. WICKER (for himself, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BENNET, Mr. 

INHOFE, Ms. BALDWIN, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. MORAN, Mrs. 

SHAHEEN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, and Ms. ROSEN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate 

advance refunding bonds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lifting Our Commu5 nities through Advance Liquidity for Infrastructure Act’’ 

6 or the ‘‘LOCAL Infrastructure Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF ADVANCE REFUNDING BONDS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by section 

9 13532 of Public Law 115–97 are repealed and the proviVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:53 Mar 19, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S479.IS S479

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 479 IS

1 sions of law amended by such section are restored as if 

2 such section had never been enacted. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by this sec4 tion shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
1

HRP ((b)(1) “other”) FY 2017

April 19, 2018

Project (Project 

Proponent) Activity Funding

R-3

Coyote Ridge Grazing 

Program for Serpentine 

Species

Santa Clara Valley Open 

Space Authority

Habitat restoration across 4,160 acres on Coyote Ridge 

in Santa Clara County to benefit serpentine-dependent 

and aquatic species through enhancement of wetland 

and riparian habitats, and improvement of connectivity, 

via implementation of a grazing management plan to 

benefit Bay checkerspot butterfly, CA tiger salamander, 

CA red-legged frog, Santa Clara Valley dudleya, 

Metcalf Canyon jewelflower, and Tiburon paintbrush.

**$357,419

(Note: It is anticipated that 

FWS will provide $355,121 

and BOR will provide $94,785 

in FY 2018, for a total HRP of 

$807,325)

C-1

Captive Rearing and 

Release to Support 

Recovery of Lange’s 

Metalmark Butterfly at 

Antioch Dunes NWR

The Urban Wildlands Group

Continuation of captive propagation for 3 years to 

include: (1) capture of 3-5 females per year; (2) captive 

breeding of adults from the geneline continuing in 

captivity from the previous year; (3) periodic rapid 

assessment of habitat quality of restored habitat; (4) 

release of 3⁄4 of the captive-bred individuals into 

restored habitat; and (5) continued coordination with 

conservation partners on habitat management and 

restoration recommendations to benefit the Lange’s 

metalmark butterfly.

**$97,407

(Note: FWS will provide 

$99,705 in FY 2018 for a total 

of $197,112 for 2 years)

Sand Ridge Preserve 

Habitat Restoration Project

Center for Natural Lands 

Management

Restoration and enhancement of 18.6 acres of the 

Sand Ridge Preserve in Kern County to benefit 

Bakersfield cactus and the San Joaquin Valley giant 

flower loving fly.

*$254,161

Todisco Ranch 

Conservation Project

Sierra Foothill Conservancy

Provided additional funds to fully fund the 2016 award 

for a conservation easement on 480 acres to protect 

grassland, vernal pools, and oak woodland habitats to 

benefit CA tiger salamander, vernal pool fairy shrimp, 

vernal pool tadpole shrimp, valley elderberry longhorn 

beetle, hairy orcutt grass, and succulent owl’s clover in 

Madera County.

*$96,000

Semitropic Water Storage 

District Pond Road Property 

Conservation Easement 

Land Protection Project

Center for Natural Lands 

Management

Provided additional funds toward the 2016 award for a 

conservation easement on 402 acres of alkali sink 

habitat to benefit San Joaquin kit fox, Tipton kangaroo 

rat, and blunt-nosed leopard lizard in Kern County.

*$260,604

FY 2017 Allocation 

$1,500,000

BOR 

USFWS

+$750,000

+$750,000

Project Costs Total: 

$1,065,591

BOR 

USFWS

-$610,765

-$454,826

Program Administration 

and Overhead Costs 

Total: $434,409

BOR 

USFWS

-$139,235

-$295,174

* BOR Funded

** Service Funded
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 40680 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Bridget Marie Dobrovolsky,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas No. 4:19

- CR

- 242

- 9

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Higginson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Bridget Dobrovolsky has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dobrovolsky has filed a pro se response and motion for appointment of substitute counsel . The

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opin

ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 24, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-40680 Document: 00515912884 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/24/2021No. 20

- 40680

2 record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Dobrovolsky ’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore de

cline to consider the claim wit hout prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief , relevant portions of the record , and Dobrovolsky ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , coun

sel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

. 42.2. The motion for appoint ment of sub

sti tute counsel is **DENIED**

. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901,
902

− 03 (5th Cir. 1998)

. Case: 20-40680 Document: 00515912884 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/24/2021
§ 618.710 Categories of Trade Readjustment Allowances. ( a ) *Basic TRA.* Basic TRA is payable to an AAW who meets the requirements of § 618.720. Basic TRA is payable for weeks of unemployment after the worker meets the criteria for exhaustion of UI under § 618.720(e) and, consistent with § 618.725, for weeks of unemployment during which the worker either is enrolled in, is participating in, or has completed approved training, or has received a waiver of the training requirement under § 618.735.
( b ) *Additional TRA.* Additional TRA is payable to an AAW who meets the requirements of § 618.760. Additional TRA is payable only for weeks of unemployment during which the worker is participating in approved training.
( c ) *Completion TRA.* Completion TRA is payable to an AAW who meets the requirements of § 618.765. Completion TRA is payable only for weeks of unemployment during which the worker is participating in approved training. Completion TRA is payable only after the worker has exhausted all rights to Basic and Additional TRA.
§ 4.1002 What is the purpose of this subpart? ( a ) The purpose of this subpart is to establish rules of practice and procedure for the hearing process available under 25 CFR 83.38(a)(1) and 83.39 to a petitioner for Federal acknowledgment that receives from OFA a negative proposed finding on Federal acknowledgment and elects to have a hearing before an ALJ. This subpart includes provisions governing prehearing conferences, discovery, motions, an evidentiary hearing, briefing, and issuance by the ALJ of a recommended decision on Federal acknowledgment for consideration by the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs (AS-IA).
( b ) This subpart will be construed and applied to each hearing process to achieve a just and speedy determination, consistent with adequate consideration of the issues involved.
#### § 3255.11 When I submit confidential, proprietary information, how can I help ensure it is not available to the public?

When you submit data and information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure by 43 CFR part 2, you must clearly mark each page that you believe contains confidential information. BLM will keep all data and information confidential to the extent allowed by 43 CFR 2.13(c).
#### Patsy V. Croce, Appellant, v. Village of Bronxville, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered when plaintiff slipped as he crossed a mound of snow created by defendant clearing the street with snowplows, the complaint was dismissed at the close of the case. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1016.]
EPA Presentation on UST Regs at SBA Roundtable

January 27, 2012

EPA OUST Attendees:

Carolyn Hoskinson

Paul Miller

Cho Yi Kwan

In person attendees at SBA Roundtable:

Kevin Bromberg, SBA

Heidi King

Jonathan Gledhill

Jack Snyder

Anne LeHuray

Jeff Longsworth

Leslie Ritts

David C. Ailor

Elahe Zahirieh

Charlie Grizzle

Dan Bosch

Bill Weissman

Lauren Bailey

Richard Belzer

Sarah Bresolin Silver, SBA

Jonathan Tolman

Jane Luxton

EPA presented a general overview of the proposed changes to the UST regulations and walked 

through the comparison document that can be found at 

http://www.epa.gov/oust/fedlaws/Crosswalk.pdf

SBA roundtable members asked a number of questions about wastewater tanks.
Exhibit 24.3

POWER OF ATTORNEY

As a director of NewPage Holding Corporation, a
Delaware corporation, and of NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the Company), I hereby constitute and appoint Douglas K. Cooper, David J. Prystash, and George F. Martin, and each of them, with full
power to act without the others, as my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (Form 10-K), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other documents in
connection with the Form 10-K, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about
the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 15th day of
February, 2011.



/s/ Ronald C. KesselmanSignaturePrintName:

Ronald C. Kesselman
Exhibit 32.2

                  Certification Pursuant to
                   18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                   as Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


          In connection with the Annual Report of Myoffiz,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jaren Chan Eng Ann,
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                              By /s/  Jaren Chan Eng Ann
                                -------------------------
                              Jaren Chan Eng Ann
                              Chief Executive Officer


May 28, 2004
Opinion issued April 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00183-CV

———————————

SHELBY WEBSTER, Appellant

V.

CARLTON JENSEN, DAWN JENSEN, HOLLY HACKNEY, TODD 

HACKNEY AND KYLE JENSEN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 387th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 10-DCV-182487

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 24, 2014, Appellant, Shelby Webster, has filed a motion to 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued and

more than 10 days have passed and no party has responded to the motion. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). 
2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland and Brown.
§ 37.5 Collection of information. ( a ) The collections of information contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned clearance numbers 1004-0165 (cave nominations) and 1004-0166 (confidential information). The information provided for the cave nominations will be used to determine which caves will be listed as “significant” and the information in the requests to obtain confidential cave information will be used to decide whether to grant access to this information. Response to the call for cave nominations is voluntary. No action may be taken against a person for refusing to supply the information requested. Response to the information requirements for obtaining confidential cave information is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with Section 5 of the Federal Cave Resources Protection Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4546; 16 U.S.C. 4301).
( b ) The public reporting burden is estimated to average 3 hours per response for the cave nomination and one-half hour per response for the confidential cave information request. The estimated response time for both of the information burdens includes time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Bureau of Land Management Clearance Officer, WO-873, Mail Stop 401 LS, 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project 1004-0165/6, Washington, D.C. 20503.
#### § 3601.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part establish procedures for the exploration, development, and disposal of mineral material resources on the public lands, and for the protection of the resources and the environment. The regulations apply to permits for free use and contracts for sale of mineral materials.
#### § 35.44 Right to administrative offset.

The amount of any penalty or assessment which has become final, or for which a judgment has been entered under § 35.42 or § 35.43, or any amount agreed upon in a compromise or settlement under § 35.46 of this part, may be collected by administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716, except that an administrative offset may not be made under this section against a refund of an overpayment of Federal taxes, then or later owing by the United States to the defendant.
§ 3502.41 What happens to a permit or lease if the permittee or lessee dies? If the permittee or lessee dies, BLM will recognize as the record title holder of the permit or lease: ( a ) The executor or administrator of the estate, if probate is required but has not been completed and they have filed the evidence required by § 3502.40(b) of this part; or
( b ) The heirs or devisees, if probate has been completed or is not required, if they have filed evidence required by § 3502.40(a) of this part.
#### § 3585.5-1 Exploration license.

Private parties, jointly or severally, may apply for exploration licenses to explore known hardrock mineral deposits which are not under lease or within an area subject to application and lease under § 3585.3 of this title to obtain geologic, environmental and other pertinent data concerning such deposits. Exploration licenses do not grant the licensee any preference right to a lease.
# Službeni list C 249I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 249I |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 63.29. srpnja 2020. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 249I

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 63.29. srpnja 2020.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | IV.   Obavijesti |
| | OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Vijeće Europske unije |
| 2020/C 249 I/01 | Donošenje izmjena poslovnika Eurojusta | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

IV.   Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Vijeće Europske unije

2020/C 249 I/01

Donošenje izmjena poslovnika Eurojusta

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

IV. Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Vijeće Europske unije

| 29.7.2020 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CI 249/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2020

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CI 249/1

---

Donošenje izmjena poslovnika Eurojusta

(2020/C 249 I/01)

Kolegij Eurojusta donio je 24. srpnja 2020. izmjene poslovnika Eurojusta (1). Te su izmjene priložene Provedbenoj odluci Vijeća (EU) 2020/1114 od 23. srpnja 2020. (2).

Za Kolegij Eurojusta

Ladislav HAMRAN

Predsjednik Eurojusta

---

(1)  Vijeće odobrilo Provedbenom odlukom (EU) 2019/2250 od 19. prosinca 2019. (SL L 336, 30.12.2019., str. 309.), a Kolegij donio 20. prosinca 2019. (SL L 50, 24.2.2020., str. 1.).

1

(2)  SL L 244, 29.7.2020., str. 13

2

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4633 

To improve outcomes for Medicaid beneficiaries with major depressive disorder 

or other mental health conditions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2022 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To improve outcomes for Medicaid beneficiaries with major 

depressive disorder or other mental health conditions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GUIDANCE RELATING TO MEDICAID COVERAGE 

4 OF GENETIC TESTING TO IMPROVE OUT5 COMES FOR BENEFICIARIES WITH MAJOR DE6 PRESSIVE DISORDER OR OTHER MENTAL 

7 HEALTH CONDITIONS. 

8 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

9 of this Act, the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare 

10 & Medicaid Services shall issue guidance for State MedVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:40 Aug 02, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4633.IS S4633

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4633 IS

1 icaid programs through a State Medicaid Director letter 

2 that specifies best practices to improve outcomes for indi3 viduals eligible for medical assistance under State Med4 icaid programs who have major depressive disorder or 

5 other mental health conditions. The guidance shall include 

6 coverage policy examples utilizing pharmacogenetic testing 

7 to support clinicians seeking medication options to treat 

8 patients and reduce trial and error from the Medicare pro9 gram or from issuers of individual or group health insur10 ance coverage. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 903.1 Purpose and scope of regulations.

The regulations in this subpart are issued to implement the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a). The regulations relate to all records maintained by the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries (Joint Board) which are identifiable by individual name or identifier and all systems of such records which are retrievable by name or other identifier. They do not relate to personnel records of Government employees, which are under the jurisdiction of the Civil Service Commission, and, thus, subject to regulations issued by such Commission. The regulations set forth the procedures by which individuals may request notification of whether the Joint Board maintains or has disclosed a record pertaining to them or may seek access to such records maintained in any non-exempt system of records, request amendment of such records, and appeal any initial adverse determination with respect to any such request.
#### § 30.189 May my designated recipient refuse to accept the interest?

Yes. Your designated recipient may refuse to accept the interest, in which case the renounced interest will descend to the devisees or heirs of the decedent as if you had predeceased the decedent. When the judge notifies the designated recipient of the renunciation, the judge will specify a deadline for the recipient to file a written refusal to accept the interest. If no written refusal is received before the deadline, the interest will descend to the designated recipient.
#### § 3811.2-3 Lands in Indian reservations.

All lands contained within the boundaries of an established Indian Reservation are withdrawn from all location, entry, and appropriation under the General Mining Law of 1872, as amended. All minerals on Indian Reservations may only be acquired by lease pursuant to the Act of May 11, 1938 (25 U.S.C. 396a), the Act of March 3, 1909 (25 U.S.C. 396), or the Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982 (25 U.S.C. 2101 *et seq.*). The regulations governing the mineral leasing of Indian lands are found in 25 CFR Chapter I Subchapter I.

[59 FR 44857, Aug. 30, 1994]