### April 14, 2009

Ms. Laurel**Dygow~ki,** 

### 8P-AR U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regiun 

### 8 1595 Wynkoop Street l1enver, Colorado 

### 80202-1129 

### RE: Roseburg Forest Products Co. Regional Haze Section 114 Request

Dear Ms. Dygowski: Enclosed,**plea~e** 

### find the completed Request for Tnfoll11ation for our Missoula Particleboard Facility, located in Missoula, Montana. As 

### required in the instruction, sections were l.:omplcted for each sanderdust burner IOl.:aled at Missoula Particleboard. These include the Boiler, Roemrnc Burner, and Solagen Burner. Additional information was not provided for the GEKA Hot Oil Heater, the natural gas burners on the six wood particle dryers, the Melamine Burner, or lhe RTO, hecause none ofthis equipment bums sanderdust. 

### If you have any questions regarding 

### the enclosed information, please feel free to contJct EJlcn Porler at (541) 679-2130. Sincerely,

Kenneth Cole Plant Manaa-'er Enclosure

### Attachment A Roseburg Forest Products Request fnr Information**PurSu~Dt** 

### to Section 114 ofthc CAA P;irt I: General Facility ])ata 1. Name offacility: Roseburg Forest ProductslMissoula Particleboard 

### 2. Complete street address offacility CPhysicallocation); a. Street Address: Seetien 8, Tovmship+3--Nefth, Hultgc 19 West 3300 Ra ser Rd. b,**City~** Missoula 

### c. Stnte, MT 

### d. Zip: 59806 

### e. County: 

### Mi:mtlle Missoula 3, Facility contact a. Name (First Name, Last Name): Ellcn Porter b. Title: Manager J Environmental Affairs c. Tdephuuenumber: 541-679-2130 d. Fax number: 541-679-2714 

### e. E-mail: ellenp@rfpco.com f. Mailing address: PO**Box400-7;-Mi.SS(H:l!a,-M-~9W6** 1088, Roseburg, DR 9'}470 

### Part 

### 11: Sander Dust Burner Emission Unit Data (Please complete entire section for each sander dust bumcr, additional copic-'1 may he ncccssary) 

### 1. Emission 

### l'nit Name: Sander Dust Boiler a. Type ofBoiler (e.g., spreader stoker, suspemion-fired, fluidized bed): Stoker 

### b. Make: 

### Babcock & 

### Wilcox c. Madej; Unknown 

### d. Model Year: 1969 e. Yell" installed: 1969 

### f. 

### Expecled equipment life: Unknown g. Unit Is CUlTcntly Operational (Check One): LX YES LJ NO lfY011 answered YES above, continue on to h. Ifyou answered NO ilbuve, answer the following and then continue to next unit:



### i. D<:lte of unal operation: n. Will this unit be opemted in the future (eheekunc)? i] YES n NO 

### Ifyou answered 

### YES abuve, indicated possible date ofoperation t.Uld continue to h: h. Fuel Data (provide data for each type offuel used) 

### AI1. Unit Capacity (MMBtuihr): 55 MMDtuihr II. Maximum Fuel Consumption Rate (tonslhr): 1.5 tons/hr )II. Maximum Nalural Gas Firing Rate (MMc£'hr): .035 MMcf/hr IV. High heating value (Dttv'lb): 8500 Btu/lb 

### 2, Boiler Unit Outlet Information (Complete the follov,rjng 

### exhaust gas parameters for the indicated boiler. Iftbe boiler shares if common stack 

### with another boiler, plea<;e only provide exhaust infonnation for the specified boiler). 

### a. Does this unit sha.re an exhaust**~tack** with 

### another unit? (Check One) 

### rxYES UNO Ifyou answered YES above, plL:ase indicate which other units or emission sources 

### share this stack: Roemmc Burner I 

### 6 wood part 

### icle dryers b. Boiler Outlet Volumetric- FIQW1"atc (acfin): 29,034 acfm 

### c. Boiler Outlet Temperature (F): 572 F 

### d. Boiler Outlet Moisture (Q;iJ): 

### 9.9% e. Stack Heighi (ft): 

### 67 ft 

### f. Stack Diameter (ft): 2.5 f t 

### g. M!lximum Gross Heat Input (h1MBtuIhr): S 5 MMBtu/hr 

### h. Hours ofOperation: 8760 hrs 1. 

### Design Perceut Load: Unknown J. 

### Average Uncontrolled PM Emissions (lblhr): Unknown 

### k. Average Uncontrolled**PMI~** 

### Emissions (lb/hr): Unknown 

### 1. Average Uncontrolled NOx Emissions (lb/hr): 33.35 lb/hr Ill. 

### Average Uncontrolled SOl Emissions (lbJ11l'): Unknown 

### 3. Existing Pollution Control Equipment (Complete the following for each picce ofcontrol equipment, make additional copies to provide infonnation for all equipment). a. PM Control Technology Information I. 

### Typc ofPM Control Technology: Mul ticlones ll. 

### MakelModel ofPM Control Technology: Babcock & w.i lcox I Unknown Model Ill. 

### Year ingtalled: 1969 IV. 

### Installed Cost ofControl De

....i.ce ($): Unknown 

### v. Annual Operating CoM ofConlro1 Deviee ($/yr): Minimal 

### vi. ExpeL:led life ofequipment: Unknown VII. 

### Relevant sizing information (for example, if the control device is an ESP, provide munber offi;;:lds, collector plate area, etc.): Unknown \'111. 

### Design control efficiency (%): Unknown



### ix. Average Contrlllled PM Emissions (lb/hr): 8.4 lb/hr 

### x. Average Controlled PM10 

### Emissions (lbim): 9.042 Ib/hr 

### b. NOx Control Technology Infonnation: No Equipment 

### A·'I. Type ofNOx Control Technology: No Equipment 11. MakefModel ofNO

### x Control Technology: N/A 

### iii. Yem installed: N/A iv. Installed Cost ofControl Device ($); N / A v. 

### Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr); N/A vi. Expected life ofequipment: N/ A vii. Relevant sizing information (tor example, ifthe control device is an NCSR, provide catalyst volwne, system capacity, etc.): N/A viii. Design control efficiency (%): N/ A

lX. Average Controllcd 

### NOx Emissions (lb/hr): N!A c. S02 Control**Tel~hIlology** Information 

### i. Type ofS02 Control Technology: No Equipment iL Makel1vlodcl O[S02 Control Technology: N/JI. lll. Year installed: N i A IV. Installed Cost ofConlro] Device ($): N/JI. v. 

### Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): 

### N/ A vi. Expected life ofequipment: N / JI. vii. Relevant sizing infonnation (for example, ifthe conrrol deviec 

### is a pClcked caustic scrubber, providc caustie**u~mgc,** paeking volume, etc.): N / A viii. Design control efficiency (%): N/A

IX. Average Controlled 

### 502Emissions 

### (lblhr): N/A



### Thefollowing informatioll should be completed U;fiflJ{ 

### datafor the year 2002. /finformation for 2002 

### is not representatil'e o/current operations (for example, 

### if Ihis 

### wtit 

### is no IOllger u.';ing naJuralgas), provide informationfor a representativeyear andprovide reasonsfor why tile alternativeyear 

### i,f more representatiw tltall 

### 2002.

4. Fuel Infonnation --I . h T Amount of I Hearmg: Value of r l Maximum Fuel Sulfur Content YellI ofdata if not'l .1stEac ypcof I

. . Fuel

# u:>oo-+ fuel used I Fuel I**(to~~~g** Rare ofFud 2002 lind**r~li.'>on** 

## i ",d wut> I Btullb "BluI"O

## ~_W_'_'"_Iu_l--+ 10/<_,,_"

### _W_L_l_-t--,_o_,_no_'_U_Sin_,_20_0_'--j 

### L Sanderdust**L~onSL:-:tU/lb** 

### 1 11

. 5 

### ton/hlI Nil 

# ! Natural Gas 

### i';no

# MM~c;[ jlO'JO BtU/S.C.:f 

# i· O'3'J._MMCf/hr 

### unkno::-+-

# --~-----I L.

### ~_I 

# __"----

__

A-3

### "YES 

## n NO 

### Ifyou answered 

### NO above, answer the 1. Emission Unit Name: Roerrunc Sander Dust Burner a. Type of Boiler (e.g., spreader stoker, suspension-fired, fluidized bed): Suspens ion Burner b. Make: Roemmc e. Model: RB 480 

### d. Model Year: 1978 

### e. Year installed: 1979 

### f. Expected equipment life: Unknown 

### g. Unit**I~** 

### Currently Operational (Cheek One): 

### If you answered YES above, continue on to h. tl)llovting and then continue to next unit: L 

### Date offinal operation: H. Will 

### this unit be operated in the future (check one)'! CJ 

### YES [] NO ]f 

### you answered YES above, indicated possible date ofoperation and continue on to h: h. Fuel Datil 

### (provide data for each typc offuel used) 1. 

### Unit CapAcity (MMBtullrr): 50 M!vffitu/hr 11. 

### Maximum Fuel Consumption Rate (tOmi/hr): 2.94 Lons/yr 

### 111. Maximum Natural Gas Firing Rate (MMcf/hr): N/A - sustaining flame only IV. 

### IIigh he<lting value (Btw1b): 8100 Btu/lb 2. Hailer Unit Outlet Information (Complete the following exhaust gas parameters for the' indicateu boiler. 

### If the boiler shim;s H 

### corrunon slack with another boiler, pleasc only proviue exhaust infonnation for the speeified boiler). a. 

### Does this unit share an exhaust sLAck with another unit'! (Check One) YES [J 

### NO Ifyou answered YES above, please indicate which other units 

### or emission sources share this stack: Boiler, 6 

### wood particle dryers 

### b. Boiler Outlet Volwnetric Flowra1c (actin): Variable c. Boiler Outlet Temperature (F): 7

## a0 -1 

### 050 F d. Boiler Outlet Moisture (%): 6-7?0" e. 

### Stack Height (ft): 

### 45. 5 ft f. 

### Stack Diameter (ft): 

### 6 f t 

### g. Maximum Gross Heat Input (1vIMBtuJhr): 50 MMBtu/hr h. Hours ofOperation: 8760 A-4I. Design Percent Load: 

### Unknown J. Average Unc(lntrolied PM Emissions (lbfhr): 

### Unknown 

### k. Average Uncontrolled PM IO Emissions (lb/hr): 

### Unknown l. Average Uncontrolled NOx Emissions (lblhr): 10.06 

### lb/hr m. Average Uncontrolled S02 Emissions (lblhr): 

### Unknown 3. Existing Pollution Conlrol Equipment (Complete lhe following for each piece ofcontrol equipment, make .lldditional copies to provide information for all equipment).

a. PM Control Technology Infonnalion 

### 1. Type ofPM Control Technology: 

### Multiclone ii. Makt>:lM:odel ofPM Control Technology: 

### Polutrol, Unknown Model Ill. Year installed: 1979 l\'. Installed Cost ofControl Device (5): 

### Unknown v. Annual Operating Cost of Control Device (Sfyr): 

### Minimal vi. Expected 

### life ofequipment: 

### Unknown Vll. Relevant sizing information (for example, 

### iIthe control device is an 

### tSP, provide number oftields, collector plate area, etc.): 

### Unknown viii. Design control efficiency 

### (%): 80- 99\

ix. Average Controlled PM Emissions (lblhr): 15, 3 

### lb/hr x. Average Conlrolled PM

### IO Emissions (lblhr): 17.1 

### Ib/hr b. NOx Control Technology Infotmation: 

### No Euipment L Type ofNOx Control Technology: N/A n. MakelM:odel ofNOx Control Technology: N/ A iii. Yeal" installed: N/ A IV**In~taJkxl** Cost ofControl Devict': ($): N/A v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Devicl: ($/yr): N/ A VI. Expected life ofequipment: N/A VU. Relev<mt sizing inJ:Cllmalion (for example, 

### ifthe control device is an NCSR, provide c.lltalyst volume, system capacity, etc,): N/ A VllI. Design control efficiency (%): N/ A

IX. Average Controlled NOx Emissions (lblhr): N/A C. S02 Control Teehnology Infotmation 

### L Type OfS02 Control Technology: 

### No Equipment 11. MakcModel ofS02 Control Technology: N/ A iii, Year installed: N/A iv. Installed Cost of Control Device 

### ($): N/A v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device (S/yr): N/A vi. Expccled life ofequipment: N/ A VI]. Relevant sizing information (for example, if

### the control device is a packed emmie sembber, provide caustie usage, packing volumt':, ele,): N/ A 

### ASh 

### gesign Pereeflt Load:**j~** 

### Average-ll'ooootra-Hed PM BnOlissiofts (ll3thI}: k Average UfleOlttf&Hed

### l!Mttl**IWb~if.lns(lbll'lI'-):** h Avcmge-U-floo:fltfOl.le4 NOx- Emissions 

### (lbihr):**Jft;-A-~ft€ontrolled** -8-Gz-Emiss-iens (I b/hr): 

### Roemmc Continued 3. Existing PoJiution Control Equipment (Complete the following for each piece 

### 01' control equipment, make additional copies to provide information for all equipment).

a. PM Control Technology Information 

### L Type of

### PM Control Technology: 

### Mul t 

### iclone II. Make/Model of

### PM Control Technology: WESTEC, Unknown Model 111. Year installed: 19 B7 IV. Installed Cost ofControl Device 

### ($): Unknown v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): Mj n:i ma 1 VI. Expected life ofequipment: Unknown Vll. Relevant sizing information (for example, 

### ifthe control device is 

### an ESP, provide number offields, collector plate area, etc.): Unknown Vlll. Design control efficiency 

### (%): 80- 99 %-

lX. Average Controlled 

### PI\,1 Emissions (Iblhr): 2.7 Ib/hr x, Average Controlled 

### PMj(I Emissions 

### Ob/hr): 2.9 Ib/hr 

### b;**G6fitrot-~eclmology-Jnformution-:** J. 

### 'li'fle----ef-N-9x-GentJei--T-e\7hnolegy: 

### ii-.-Ma*eIM-edel----0f-NQxGontro-l 'rechnelo-g-y-;- Ill. 

### ¥ em--iftStaHed-: IV**!nstalle<!-Goot-<7~Coo!rol** 

### Dev'ce ($)i 

### v,**AnnunIOpem'ing-EeS<~"(S/)'r)** VI. 

### Expected life-ofequiflment VII. Re-\-evant !.'i7ing imOnnfltion (fOf**CXflrnp!e;-i-~---ae¥i6e--i5~** 

### Pf8¥id6-eately-st-velume;---s-ystem ellflaGi

### ty-,

-

# ete-+ vm, Design-Q{lfltr-B1--effteienoy (%):



### 'Bt;--Average Gen!l'elled 

### WOx Bmimens-(lblhr): c, SGz£entrol-Technol-ogy-In-fetmafi-oo**i.:r~~H~ H~-Mak€_W,{;&atrol**  

### Techoolegl" iii. 

### YeilI----ffi-st-al-lerl: 

### iv. Installed Cost--ef-G:-entrol. Device 

### ($): 

### Vc-A_Operating**Co;;t"'w""ol-Be~yr}** vi. Expectea---J-i-fe-fff--et]tlipmeffi-'**¥i-h---Rele¥afl.~-ffilg---iflf0Ffflation** (fof-eKaHlp-1e-,-if-'Ehe-eon-tro

### 1 deviGe:i--s-a-pa6k-ed eaustio scrubber, provide-ooliSti-eusage,**paGkmg~** A-Sviii. Design control e1ficicncy (%): N 

### IA IX. Average Controlled S02Emissions (lb/hr): N/A



### Tirefollowing information .'ihouldhe completed using datafor the year 2002. 

## If information for 2002 is not representative of current operations (for example, 

### if this unit 

### is flO 

### longer using ,rmuralgas), provide informationfor a representativeyear andprovide rellson$ for wiry the alterna/;L'eyetlr i1J' 

### more representative than 2002.

4. Fuelinformarioll 

### --_.---_

.. AmoWlt of l-k1l1ing Value of , Maximum Fuel Sulfur Content Year ofdata ifnot oof fuel used Fuel Firing Rut\:' ofFui:J 2002 WId r\:'asun**~nd** u.nits (I3tll/lb OT Btu/set) (tonfhr or scfi'hr) ('}OS Wt_) fOT not using 2002

.. i .. '---- 

### ._------- t 15,673 ton 8100 

### Btu/lb 2.94 

### ton/hr Nil

.

# __ . 

## -_

.. 

### ---- ..

### __ . 

### ._- N/A s 4 MMsef 1050 Btu/se sustaining 

### Unknown flame onlv 

## .- . 

# .1 I I 

# , i 

# _L I

._- ..___.__ J 

### Ga**Li~t.** Each Typ Fud U$ed

..

## _._-~ INatural ! 

# , iSanderdus !



### J. Emission Unit Namc: Solagen Sander DUtil Burner a. Type ofBoiler (e.g., spreader stoker, suspension-fired, tluidized bed): Suspen8 ion Burner b. Make: Solagen c. Model: NW - 4 5 d. Model Year: 2005 e. Year installed: 2006 f. Expected equipment 

### life: Unknown g. 

### Unit Is Currently Operational (Check Onc): i'.I YES 

### 0 NO 

### Ifyou answercd 

### YES above, continue on to h. Uyou answered NO above, answer the follOWIng lll1d then continue to next unit: 1. Date offInal operation: tl. Will this unit be operated 

### in the future (check one)? :J YES UNO Jfyou answered YES above, indicated possible date ofoperation and continue on to h: h. Fuel Data (jJrovjde data for each type offuel used) A·6



# -_._---_ ..

# _ ....

. .... 

# ----_._._--45 I. Unit Capacity 

### (MMBtuihr):**~}MMBtu/m** 

### v, Maximum Fuel Consumption 

### Rate (tonslhr): 2.8 tons/hr VI. Maximum Natural Gas Filing Rate (MMcflhr): .045 J'v1Mcf:/hr V11. High heating value (Dtu/lb): 8100 Btu/lb 2. Boiler Unit Outlet Information (Complete the following**exhall~1** gas parameters for the indicated boiler. Ifthe boiler shares a cornmon stack with another boiler, please only provide exhaust information for the specified boiler). a. Does this unit share an exhaust stack with another unit? (Check One) Xi YES 0 NO Ifyou answered YES above, please indicate which oilier units or emission sources 

### share this stack: Green Particle 

### nryer b. Boiler Outlet Volumetric Flo\\Tate (acfm): 37 , 178 acfm c.. Boiler Outlet Temperature (F); 239 F d. Boiler OUllet Moistwe (%): 41.8% 

### c. Stal;k Height (ft): 60 f 

### t [ Stack Diameter 1ft): 4 ft I 10 

### in g. Maximom Gross Heat [nput (MMBtuJhr): 45 MMBt u/hr h. Hours ofOperation; 8760 1. Design Percent Load: Unknown J. Average Uncontrolled PM**EJl]is~ions** (lb/hr): 20.7 lb/hr (est.) k. Average Uncontrolled PMlO Emissions (lb/lrr): 8.3 lb/hr (est.) I. AverageUneontrolledNOxf-:mi:'ision.s(lblhr): 21.03 lb/hr (est.) m. Average Uncont.rolled S02 Ernis:'iions (1b/hr): 1.125 Ib/hr 3. Existing Pollution Control Equipment (Completc lhe following for each piece ofcontrol equipment, TTll:lke additional copies to provide information for all equipmenl).

a. PM Control Technology Information 1. Type ofPM Control Technology: eye lone 11. Make/tvtodel ofPM Control Technology: Solagen/RFP 05

- DM' 2 01 m. Year installed: 2006 IV. Installed Cost ofControl Device 

### ($): $200,000 (est.) v. Annual Operating COS[ ofControl Device (S/yr): Minimal vi. Expected life ofequipmt;:nl: 15 yrs (es 

### t . ) Vll. Relevant s'izing information (for exampit;:, ifthc 'conlrol device is an ESP, provide number of fields, collector plate area, etc.): 13 ft VHI. De:>ib'1l -.:onlrol cfficit;:ncy (%): 99%

IX. Average Controlled PM Emissions (lb/lrr): Unknown x.**Av~rage** Controlled PMIO Emissions (lb/hr): Unknown b. NOx Control Technology Information: A-7

### ,. UnilGapa<ily-(MMBtuihr): 42.2 MMB_ v.**Max-i-mum-Fl::l.el-Ge~-ate--fttmsIhFJ-: ¥~.** **"Ma~m-l-Gas-Firing** 

### Rate (MMefi'hr): 

# ¥".**fligh-he~_{BtulJb):** 2. Boiler Unit Guilet 

### InformatioB (Complete the follov/ing eKhaust gas parameters for 

### the 

### indieateG-boi-leF.--+14be---BfJ-HCr shares a eommofl-s-tac-k-with another**boile~se** 

### only f3fO'lide ex!tl:l:ust iftfaormttrion fer the ::,ll'ccified boiler'}. a**gees-tffis.-u:£HJ--Slt~aek** 

### with 

### Mother unit? 

### (Cheek 

### One) 

### 9 YES B-N8 lof-you anHwcred YE&--&be¥c,**ple~e** indicate which ot1teF units or emissiotl**JOtlfC~** 

### sflare4fli<rSl$K- 

### !oc-·Bttile<-Btltlet-.1fflhlmelffe-F16WT_faefmr 

### c; Beilef-G1:!tlet--i-emperntl.trefFt:

"' Beil.r 8>l\let-Me;s

..",{%)< e.**~t£l.C-k-Heigflt** (ft): f, 

### 8<aek-flffim'>er-ffl-r gc**-M~,BeflHnput-(MMB_):** h.·--+!tuffil-ofBl""ttti_ 

### i-. gesign PCfecnt bead; l" Avemge-U-neo-nt1'OHed-PM**Emi~sioro-<~o/hr): 1<C--'~-PMro-~fll>liH}**  

### I. Avenl:ge-lJneoRtrollcd-NOx-Rrntssions{lblhr): ffl;- 

### Average**U~~ieffl-flW'illt** Solagen Continued



### 3. Existing Pollution Control Equipment (Complete the following for each piece ofcontrol equipment, make additional copies to 

### provide information [or all cquipment).

a. PM 

### Control Technology TnfOlroation 

### i. Type ofPM Control Technology: Wet. Electrostatic Precipitator Ii. 

### MakelModel ofPMControJ Technology: PPC/12R-117-234 Ill. 

### YCl;lrinstalled: 2006 lV. 

### Installed CostofConuol Device ($): $1,100,000 Y. 

### Arumal Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): $ 7 5, 000 VI. 

### Expected life ofequipment: 25 

### yrs (est.) 

### vii. Relevant siLing information (for cxample, ifthe control device is an ESP,**provid~** 

### number of

### fields, collectorplale**ar~a,** 

### etc.): 3 S I 000 cfm VIII. Design 

### control cfticicney (%): 80%

IX, 

### Average Controlled 

### PM Emissions (lb/hr): 3.93 lb/hr x. 

### Average Controlled PM lO 

### Emissions (lblhr): 3.93 Ib/hr b. NOx 

### Contrcd Technologylnformation:1. 

### Type ofNO

### x Control Technology: Low NOx Burner/Flue Gas Reini ection II. 

### Makc/Model ofNO

### x Control Technology:Solagen 111. 

### Year in:;talled: 2006 IV. 

### Installed Cost ofControl Device 

### ($): Inherent with cOst of Solagen Burner v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yl'): 

### Unknown VI. 

### ExpecLed life ofequipment: 25 

### yrs (est.) VII. 

### Relevant sizing information (for example, 

### if rhe 

### control device is an NCSR, 

### provide catalyst volume, system capacity, etc.): N/A '1111. 

### Design**controll~fficiency** (%): UnknDwn

IX. 

### Average Controlled 

### NOx Emissions 

### (lblhr): 20.5 

### lb/hr e. SOl Control Technology Information 1. 

### Type ofS02 

### Control TechnoLogy: No Equipment II. 

### Make/Model ofS02 

### Contrul Teehnology: N/A lll. 

### Year installed: N/A IV, 

### Installed Cost ofControl Device ($): N/A 

### v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): N / 

### A VI. 

### Expected 

### liCe or equipment N / 

### A VII. 

### ReJevoot sizing infonnation (for example, ifthe control device is a packed Cftustjc scrubber, provide caustic usage, packing volume, etc.); N/A Vlli. 

### Design control efficiency (%): 

### N/ A



### ix. Averagc Controlled SOl**Emis~ions** 

### (lb/hr): N/ A



### Thefollowing information should be completed using datafor the year 2002. 

## if information for 2002 is not representative of current operations (fofexample, 

### if this unit 

## u' no longer using natural gas), provide informationfor a representativeyear andprovide reasonsfor wlty tile alternativeyear if 

### mare representative than 2002.



### 4. Fuel Information

List Each Type of Fuel Used



### Sanderdust**-~---~--c-~~--c----c-,--c~-=---rcc-:-c-ccc** Amoun! of Heating Value of MilXimwn Fuel Sulfur Content Year ofdata it'not 

# i fuel used FUl:l FIt-ing Ralc ofFuel 2002 and re

# 5 ,oo and units (BruJlb or Btu!:;c!) (toulhr or sc£ihr) (%S Wt.) for nOl using 2002



### ----- 6894 2.8 

### tons/ 2008 8100 I3tu/lb <0.05% 

### ,Equipment di tons hr 

### 'xist in 2002 

### not

Natural Gas



# ---_..•**_--_._._~** 17 

### MMscf 1050 BtU/sc .045 

# j Ml>1scf/hr**~---~._--**

A-S Unknown 

# , Equipment

### di~ exist**~n** 200 

### not

# 1- i 

# Lj

DYES uNO If

### you answered NO above, answer 

### 1, Emission Unit Name: GEKA200 Hot Oil Heater 

### a. Make:Geka b. Model: Geka 200 

### c. Model Year: d. Year Installed: 

### e, Expected equipment life: C Unit Is Currelltly Operational (Check One): 

### IfyOll answered 

### YES above, L:onlinuc 

### 011 to g. 

### the following and then continue to next unit:

I. 

### Date offinal opcmtion: L1. Will this unit be operated in the future (L:hcck one)? DYES UNO 

### If

### you answered YES above, indicated possible date ofoperation and continue to g: g. 

### Unit Capaciry (MMBtWhr): 20 MMBt.u'hr 2. UJJit Stack Information 

### 11. 

### Slal:k Volumetric FloVl-Tate (acfm): 

### b. Stack Exhaust Temperature (F): 

### c. Stack Exhaust Moisture (%): 

### d. Stack !leight (ft): e. Sti:1ck Diameter 

### (ft): f. Maximum Gross Heat Inpul (MMBtw'hr): g. HOUTS 

### ofOperation: h. Design Percent LOCld: L Average Uneontrolled PM Emissions (lb/hr): J. Average Uncontrolled 

### NOx Emissions (Iblhr): k. Average Uncontrolled**SO~** Emissions (lb/hr): 3. Existing Pollution Control Equipment (Complete the following for each piece ofcontrol L:quipmenl, make additional copies to provide infonnation for all equipment). <1, PM Control Technology Informalion 1. Type ofPM Control Teel111ology: 11. Makeflv10dcI ofPM Control Technology: A-9ilL Year installed: iv. Installed Cost ofControl Device ($): v. Annual Operating**Co~t** ofControl Device ($/yr): VI. Expected life ofequipment: V11. Relevant 

### sizing informalion (for example, ifthe control device 

### is an ESP, provide number offields, collector plate**are~,** etc.): lilll. Design control efficiency (%):

lX. Average Controllcu PM Emissions (lh/hr); 

### b. NOx 

### Control Technology lnfommtion: 1. Type ofNO

### x Control Technology: ii. Make/Model ofNOX Control Technology: lll. Year installcu: lV. Installed Cost ofCootrol Device 

### ($): \I, Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): VI. Expected life ofequipmenl: Vll. Relevant sizing infonnation (for example, iflhe control device is all NCSR, provide**cat~lyst** volume, system capacity, etc.): viii. Design control efficiency (%):

IX. Average CODlrolleU 

### NOx Emissions (lblhr): c. S02 

### COlltrol Technology Information 1. Type ofSOl Control Techno)ogy; 11. Mnkefi\1odcl ofSOz Conlrol Teelmology; iii. 

### Year installed: iv. Installed Cosl ofControl Device 

### ($): v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): VI. Expected life ofequipment: vii. Relevant sizing infonnation 

### (for example, ifthe control device is a piH;ked caustic scruhber, provide caustic usage, packing volume_ etc.): viii. Design control efficiency 

### (%):

IX. Average Controlled S<hEmissions 

### (lblhr): 

### Thefollowing information shouldhe completed u.vi"g datafor theyear 2002. 

## Ifinformation for 2002 is not representative Qfcurrent operations ((or example, 

### if this unit is 

### no longer using naturalgns), provide informationfor a representative year andprovide reasonsfor why the alternativeyear is 

### more representative than 2002. 4. Fuel Information 

### Li,' Each 

### Amount of Heatmg

# V~=T~aximum fuel [ 

### T**ype=--c0_f~.** 

### --,--=F

__ u=.c".:.I-=l_J::-c-=od-=--L-

__ of--=Fuc1 ."._ I**Firin~** 

### __**~_te_..** A-10 Sulfur Cuutcnt of 

# ··--l Year 

### ofdata 

### ifnot 

## I

2002 and reason :for nut 

# ;",;;g:i0021

,

### IFUclU;~d 

# C**~-** and

# UTIil'_~ CBtulSCfm:--j

__ (S_C£_lhr_):_ I 

### Fuel (%S Wt) 

# -+--+---+--**~rI---** ----1---------1

I I



# ____-------'L

1. Emission Unit Name: Six (6) Wood Particle Dryers 

### u. Make: 

### b. Model: c. ModeJ Year: 

### d. Year lnstalkd: c. Expected**~quipmenlliffJ:** 

### f. Unit Is Currently Operational (Che<:k One): 

## [l YeS r:: NO £fyau 

### answered YES above, continue on to 2. Ifyou amwcrcd NO above, answer the following and then continue to 

### next unit: I. Date offinal operation: ii. Will this unit 

### be operated in the future (check one)? 

### ::J YES r NO 

### Ifyol!**an~wcred** 

### YES above, indicate possible date ofoperation and continue on Lo 2. 2. Unit Stack Information 3. Stack Volumetric 

### FloV\iTate (ar.:fm): h. Stack Exhaust Temperature (F): G. 

### Slack Exhaust Moisture (%): 

### d. Stack Height (ft): 

### e. Staek Diameter (ft): 

### f. Maximum Gross Heal Iupul (MMBtulhr): 

### g. I-lours ofOperation: 

### h. DGsign Percent Load: I. 

### Avemge Uncontrolled PM Emissions (lb/hr): ]. Average Uncontrolled PM

### wEmissions (lblhr): A-ll

.. - 

### -----_...

# __.--_....

# __._-------

### k. Average Uncontrolled NOx Emissions (lb/hr): I.**Avera~e** Oneontrolled S02 Emissions (lbJhr): 3, Existing Pollution Control Equipment (Complete lhe following for each piece ofcontrol equipment, make additional copies to provide information for 

### all equipment). a. PM Control Technology Information 1. Type ofPM Control Technology: II. Make/I\1odel ofPM Control TcdUJology: 

### iii Year installed: IV. Installed CosL ofConlrol Device 

### ($): v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($iyr): V1. Expected life ofequipment: vii. Relevant sizing information (for example, ifthe control device 

### is an ESP, pmvide nwnbcr of lields, collector plate area, etc.): viii. Design control efficiency (%):

IX. Average Con1rolled PM Emissions (Iblhr): x. Average ConLro!kd PM lO Emissions (lb/hr): b. N"Ox Control Teclmology Information: 1. Type ofNOx Control Technology; 11. MakelModcl ofNOx Conlrol TeelmoJogy: iii, Year imtalled: IV. lmtalled Cost ofControl Device ($): v. Annual Operating Cost ofConlrol Device ($/yr): VL Expected life ofequipment: vii. Relevant !;izing information (for example, ifthe control device is an NCSR, provide catalyst volume, system capacity, etc.): viii. Design control efficiency (%):

IX. Average Controlled NOx Emissions (Iblbr): c. 

### SCl}. Control Technology Infonnation l. Type 01'802 Control Tec;lmology: ii.**MakelMod~l** of802 Control Teclmology: 

### iii. Year inslalled. lV. Installed Cost ofControl Device (5): v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Devit:e ($/yr): iiI. Expected lile ofequipment vii. Relevant sizing infonnation (for cxample, 

### ifthe control device is a packed caustic scrubber, pwvide caustic usage, packing volume, etc.): viiI. Design l,;ontrol efficiency (%):

ix_ Avcragt: Control1ed S02 Emissions (Iblbr):

### Tilefollowing informalion shouldhe completed using datafor the year 2002. Ifin/ormation for 2002 

### is not representatiw of current opera/ions (for example, 

### if tills unit is no IOllger using naturalgu.s), provide itiformo.tionfor a representativeyear andprovide rem..-onsfor why the alternativeyear is more representath'c than 2002. 4 FueJ Informatiun



### List Each l'ype ofFucl Used

-.-.- 

### ------'--'

# -_._-- 

# I 

# t=

. - I I 

# i

I 

# L

__**.L.-_·-~_r**

# __J

1. Emis::;ion Unil Name: Melamine Burner (Natural O<ls) 

### a. Make: b. Model: c. Model YCllr: 

### d. Year Installed: e. Expected equipment life: f. Unit Is Currently Operational 

### (Check One): 

### 0 YES 1-_1 NO Ifyou an.swercd 

### 'YES above, continue on to g, 

### Ifyou answered 

### NO above, answer the following and then continue to next unit:

{. Date offinal operation: 11. Will 

### thi:; unit. be operated in the future (cheek one)? 

### DYES 

## rJ NO Ifyou fmswered YES above, indicate possible datc ofoper3tion and cont.inue to g. g,**lJni~** Capacity (MMBtu/hr): 

### 3 MM13tuJhr 

### 2. Unit Stack Informatioll a, Stack Volumetric FJoWTllte (acfrn): b. Stack Exhaust Temperalure (F): A-13c. Stack Exhaust Moisture (%): 

### d. Stack Height (fL) e. Stack Diameter (ft): f. Maximum Gross Heat Input (fvfMBtulhr): g. Hours ofOperation: h. Design Perccnt Load: 1. Average Uncontrolled PM Emissicms (lb/hr): 

### J. Avcrage Uncontrolled NOx Emissions (lblhr): 

### k. Average Uncontrolleu S02 Emissions (lb/hr): 3. Existing Pollution Control Equipmcnt (Completc the follovving for each piecc ofl:onlrol cquipment, makc additional copies to provide information for all equipml:nt). a, PM Control Technology Information 1. Type ofPM Control Technology: 11. MakelModel ofPM ContIol Technology: IlL Year installed: IV. Insrallcd Cost ofControl Device ($): v. Amlual Operating Cosl o[Control Device ($/yr): v!. t-:xpected life ofequipment: V1\, Relevant sizing information (for example, ifthe conlrol device**i~** an ESP, provide number 

### ,,1' fields, collector plate area, etc.): Vlll. Design control efficiency (%):

ix. Average Conlrollcd PM Emissions (lh/hr): b. NOx Control Tedmology lnfonnation: L Type ofNOx Control Technology: ii. MakelModel ofNOx Control Technology: 11L Year**in~lalled:** IV. Installed Cost ofControl Device 

### ($): v. Annual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): vi. Expected life ofequipment: vii. Relevant sizing information (tor example, ifthe control device is an NCSR, provide**cataly~t** volume, system capacity, etc.): viii. Design control efficiency (%):

ix. Average Controlled NOx Emissions (lblhr): c. S02 Conlro] Technology lnformation Type ofS02 Control Technology: ll. :t\.1ake/Model of802 Control Technology: lll. Year installed: iv. In$w.lled Cost orConlfor Device ($): v. Annual Operaling Cost ufControl Device ($/yr): A-14

# _____ .J

DYES :J NO Ifyou answered NO above, answer Ill. Expected life ofequipment: VII. Relevant :sizing information (for example, ifthe control device is a packed caustic scrubber, provide caustic llS<1ge, packing volume, etc.): viii. Design control cftlciency (%):

IX. Average Controlled 

### SO:I Emissions (lb/hr): 

### Thefo/lowillg information shouldbe comp/ete'/ using datafor Ihe year 2002. Ifinfonnotion for 2002 is 

### not representative of currentoperations (jor example, 

## if tills IInit is no longer using naturalgas), provide informat;orlfor a representativeyear {l1!dprovide reasonsfor why the altemativeyear is more representaJivi! tha" 2002. 4. FuellnformatiOI1 I List Each Amount of : Heating Value Maximum fuel Sllifur Year ofdata ifnot I I Type of Fuel Used**~fFuel** Firing 

### Rate , Content of 

### 2002 and rcason 

# 1\101**USOd~nd** Unit'

__ 

# I (Btu_'_'s,_C"_ffic.1_'---,-

__ 

### (:..s_cL_Ihr-c- 1: 

### fuel (%S WI) 

### ,_for 

### not using 2002

# I~---- ! 

# ·---1 

# J

. , I 

# I I 

# i 

# r----t---+---+--

..

---=-- -j-

# r---~- l. .L- ,I

_ 1. Emission Unit Name: RTO (Natural Gas) 

### a. Make: 

### b. Model:**L~,** ModeJ Year: 

### d, Year Installed: e. Expected equipment life: 

### f. Unills Currently Operation.al (Check One): Ifyou iUlswered 

### YES above, continue on to g. the tollO',¥ing and then continue to next unit,

L Date offmal operation: lL Will this unit be operated in the future (check one)? 'l YES [J NO A·15

### lfyol! answered YES above, indicate possible dale ofoperat jon and continue to g. g. Unit Capacity (MMBtu/hr): 8 MMBtuIhr 

### 2. Unit Stack TnforTI1ation a. Stack Vohlmelric Flowrale (acfm): b. Stack Exhaust Temperature (F): c. Stack**Exhau~t** 

### Moisture (%): d. 

### Stack Height (ft): 

### e. St"ck Diameter (Il): f. 

### Maximwn Gross**Hea~** 

### Input (MMBtw'hr): g. Hour::; ofOperation: h. Design Percent Load: I. 

### Average Uncontrolled PM Emissions (lblhr): J. 

### Average Uncontrolled NOx Emissions (lblhr): 

### k. Average Uncontrolled SOL Emissions (lb/'nr):

'0 

### 3. Existing Pollulion Control Equipment (Completc the following fOf each picce ofcontrol cquipmem, make additional copies to provide information for all equipment). a PM Control Teclmology Information 1. 

### Type ofPM Control Technology: II. 

### Make/Model ofPM Control Tcchnology: 111. 

### YellT installed: IV. 

### Installed Cost ofCon(:rol Device ($): 

### v, AIUlual Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): 

### v\. Expected life ofequipmenl: vii. Relevam sizing: information (for example, iftht: control device is an ESP, provide number**offield~,** 

### collector plate area, ctc.): VIll. 

### Design control efficiency (%):

IX. 

### Average Controlkd PM Emissions (Ib/hr): b. NOx Control Technology Information' 1. 

### Type ofNOx Control Technology: II. 

### MnkelModel ofNO

### x Control Technology; 111. Yei:1f insli:1l1cd: IV. 

### Installed Cost ofControl Device ($): 

### v. Aruma} Operating Cost ofControl Device ($/yr): VI. 

### Expected life ofequipmenl: V1J. 

### Relevant sizing infonnation (for example, ifthc control device is an NCSR, provide**c~~lysL** 

### volume, system capacity, etc.): 

### "111. Design control efficiency (%):

lX. 

### Average Controlled NOx**Emi~.sions** 

### (Ib/hr): A-16c. S02 Control Technology Information 1. Type ofS02 Control Technology: lL. MakelModel ofS02 Control Technology: 111. Year installed: tv. Installed Cost ofControl Device ($): v. Annual Operating Cost ofConLm] Device 

### ($/yr): VI. Expected life ofequipment: VI]. Relevnnt sizing information (for example, ifthe eontrol device is a packed caustic**~crubbcI,** provide caustic usage, packing volume, etc.): VllI. Design control efficiency (%):

IX. Average Controlled S02Emissions (lb/hr): 

### Thefollowing informatiQn should he completed Elsing datafor the year 2002. Ifinformation for 2002 if 

### 1I0t representative of current operations (jor example. 

### if this unit is 

### nQ longer using natural gaj), prm'ide inforJ7Ultioflfor a representaave**y~ur** 

### andprovide reasonsfor why the alternativeyear is more representative than 2002.

Year ofdata 

### -if

# noil 2U02 and reason 

### for nol using 2002 of Wt.) ----- - .'_.- f Heating Value :v1aximum fuel Sulfur

, 

### I I ofFue! Firing Rate ContenL s (Btulscfm) 

### (,emlf)' Fuel ('}OS



### --**-~**



## _ ..--"

... I I t



### - - -- -_.- 

# ! 4. Fuellnfonnation r---- T-------

, List Each Type I Amount ofFuc

ofhlel Used Used and Unit

L --"

_

A-17

### STATEMt;NT OF CERTIFICATION I certify 

### under penalty ofla

....... that I have personally examined and llD1 

### familiar wilh the information submitted in this docwncnt and 

### aJll1ttachments and that, based on my inquiry oftbose individuals immediately responsible for obtaining information, 

### Jbelieve that tht.: information is true, aecurate, and complete. 

## r am aware that there are significant 

### penalties for .';ubmitting false information, including the possibility affine or 

### impnsonment

t"

# '--~:;r2f-**~---.** -_... 

### ------- Signature

Plant/ Manager Title

- 

### ------_. 

# --------_._--