alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 989

Claimant awarded $1,058.50.)

#### Alice Wigginton, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 10, 1927.*

Workmen’s compensation *act*— award *may he made under.*This case is controlled' by the decision of the court in case of *Girhard*v. *State, supra.*

E. V. Champion and Charles F. Mansfield, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The evidence in this case shows that on the 13th day of November, A. D. 1924, the claimant, Alice Wigginton, was employed as nurse at the State hospital at Bartohville, Illinois, operated by the State of Illinois under the direct control of the Department of Public Welfare of said State.

The evidence further shows that the claimant was at the time of the accident standing upon a ladder in and at said hospital, and that without any fault upon her part and without any warning to her, a patient of said hospital, pushed, knocked and bumped the ladder from underneath the claimant, and as a result she fell á distance of practically ten feet to the floor and received a fracture of the oscalis of the left foot and other injuries.

The Attorney General, in his statement, admits that the claimant properly states the facts.

Under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the claimant would be entitled to receive the sum of $1296.00, but the amount of $237.50 which she received from the State should be deducted.

We therefore award the claimant the sum of $1058.50.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of County Trust Company, as Successor Trustee under the Will of Edward J. Lavery, Deceased, Respondent. Richard J. Lavery et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
Exhibit
99.6
















CONSENT
OF McDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.
 
 
 To:  The
Board of Directors of Provident Energy Ltd.
    Reference:
              Renewal Annual Information Form
      and Form 40Fof Provident Energy Trust (the
      "Trust")
   Dear
Sirs:
 
 
 We refer
to the renewal annual information form of Provident Energy Trust (the "Trust")
dated March 16, 2009 (the "AIF") and the Form 40-F of the Trust.
 
 McDaniel
& Associates Consultants Ltd. ("McDaniel") was engaged to evaluate the oil
and natural gas reserves in respect of certain properties held by Provident
Energy Ltd.  We understand that the AIF and Form 40-F contain
references to the McDaniel Report dated March 2, 2009 effective December 31,
2008 (the "Report"), and to our having evaluated the oil and natural gas
reserves in respect of these properties.  Summaries of and excerpts
from the Report are included in the Form 51-101F1.  The AIF and Form
40-F contain reference to the Form 51-101F1 and to Form 51-101F2 of McDaniel
dated March 2, 2009.
 
 We hereby
consent to the use of our name and reference to the said Report in the AIF and Form
40-F.
   
 Dated
this 13 day of March 2009.
 
 
 Yours
very truly,
 
 McDANIEL
& ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.
 
 
 
 “signed
by B. J. Wurster
 _________________________
 B. J.
Wurster, P. Eng.
 
 
 BJW:jep
    2200, Bow Valley
      Square 3, 255 - 5 Avenue SW, Calgary AB  T2P
      3G6     Tel: (403)
      262-5506     Fax: (403)
      233-2744     www.mcdan.com
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 479 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 479

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate advance 
                            refunding bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2021

 Mr. Wicker (for himself, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Bennet, Mr. 
    Inhofe, Ms. Baldwin, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Moran, Mrs. 
Shaheen, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Van Hollen, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Boozman, and 
  Ms. Rosen) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate advance 
                            refunding bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lifting Our Communities through 
Advance Liquidity for Infrastructure Act'' or the ``LOCAL 
Infrastructure Act''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF ADVANCE REFUNDING BONDS.

    (a) In General.--The amendments made by section 13532 of Public Law 
115-97 are repealed and the provisions of law amended by such section 
are restored as if such section had never been enacted.
    (b) Effective Date.--The repeal made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-24-0000028

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHAWN J. MEDEIROS, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 2CPC-22-0000677)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon consideration of Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii's ( State ) April 12, 2024 Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction, the papers in support and in opposition, and the record, it appears the State seeks dismissal of this appeal on the basis that the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit's April 18, 2023 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence ( Denial Order ), from which self-represented Defendant-Appellant Shawn J. Medeiros appeals, is not a final appealable order or judgment, and that no exception to finality applies.

We conclude that the Denial Order is not a final judgment and sentence appealable under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS ) § 641-11 (2016). The Circuit Court has not granted leave to file an interlocutory appeal from the Denial Order under HRS § 641-17 (2016). No other exception to finality applies. See State v. Johnson , 96 Hawai i 462, 470 n.12, 32 P.3d 106, 114 n.12 (App. 2001) ("[T]he collateral order exception is applicable in criminal cases only upon a denial of pretrial motions to reduce Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-24-0000028 05-JUL-2024 08:49 AM Dkt. 47 OGMDNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

bail, motions to dismiss based on double jeopardy grounds, and motions to dismiss under the Speech and Debate Clause.").

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, July 5, 2024. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

2
Order entered October 19 , 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 16

- 01174

- CV

IN RE: ROBERT P. BAX TER, JR. AND MARSHA ELLISON

D/B/A ELLISON LEASE OPERATING, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 15

- 14831



### O RDER

Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Stoddart

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of

ma ndamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs, if any, of this original proceeding.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
(No. 1073

Claimant awarded $277.78.)

#### E. E. Stephens, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 19, 1927.*

*Contract*— when *State liadle.*The State is liable for work and material furnished for the improvement of its property.

S. Bartlett Kerr, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Frank R. Eagle-ton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

This claim of $277.78 is for materials and labor furnished for improvements at Fort Massac State Park on the request of the custodian of the Park, and the State Supervising Architect. Claimant presented his statement for the amount due him to the Department of Public Works and Buildings, but it was received too late for payment, as the appropriation had then lapsed.

The custodian of Fort Massac State Park and the State Supervising Architect admit the claim is just and unpaid.

There being no dispute as to this claim, it is ordered by the court that an award be allowed in favor of claimant in the sum of $277.78.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)

**Title:** Cyber infrastructure protection

Volume 1; Volume 2; Volume 3

SuDoc:D 101.146:C 99/
Item Number:0307-A-31(online)
CGP system Number:1033912
IN REPLY 

REFER TO:

United States Department of the Interior

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 

Mid-Pacific Regional Office 

2800 Cottage Way 

Sacramento, California 95825-1898 

July 25, 2003

MP-3400 

FIN-4.00 

«Name» 

«Address» 

«Address1» 

«Address2» 

«Address3» 

Subject: Refund Provision Analysis for Fiscal Year 2002 Central Valley Project (CVP), 

Irrigation and/or Municipal and Industrial (M&I) Water 

Dear Water Contractor, 

We have prepared subject analysis for fiscal year 2002 to determine if you have an overpayment 

and are entitled to a refund in accordance with your CVP water service contract. The attached 

exhibit shows your results of operations for fiscal year 2002, less deficit and capital recovery. 

The resulting balance indicates either a positive or negative result. A negative amount “Net 

(Under)” indicates you did not qualify for a refund and no further action is required. However, if 

the result is a positive amount “Net Over”, you may be entitled to a refund. Note: The amount 

to be refunded will be reduced or possibly eliminated by any outstanding water and/or 

Restoration Fund charges due through February 2003. The Bureau of Reclamation will 

notify you if your refundable amount is adjusted, after your initial response. 

Your refundable amount can be applied in a combination of ways: 

1. Voluntary payment for: 

a. Prior fiscal year(s) deficit (irrigation) 

b. Prior fiscal year(s) accumulated deficit (M&I) 

2. Voluntary payment for fiscal year 2003; 

3. Other water payment; and/or 

4. Refund. 

Please advise Reclamation in writing within 30 days from the date of this letter, as to how you 

wish to apply your refundable amount. We process all refunds by electronic fund transfer. 
Subject: Refund Provision Analysis for Fiscal Year 2002 Central Valley Project (CVP), 

 Irrigation and/or Municipal and Industrial (M&I) Water 

2

If you choose a refund, please complete the enclosed ACH Vendor/Miscellaneous Payment 

Enrollment Form and return it with your response. 

If we do not receive your response, the overpayment/refundable amount will be applied in 

accordance with the standard priority of crediting as follows: 

Irrigation – deficit interest, principal on interest bearing deficits, non-interest bearing 

deficits and capital repayment; 

 M&I – capital repayment and the accumulated deficit, if any. 

If you have any questions, please contact the applicable Ratesetting Service staff: 

Irrigation: Ms. Linda Bringle at 916-978-5391 or; 

 Ms. Maureen Reynoso at 916-978-5374 

M&I: Ms. Masako Altman at 916-978-5365 or; 

 Ms. Tasia Papajohn at 916-978-5367 

Or any of the above at TDD 916-978-5608. 

To assist us in our ongoing effort to provide better and more timely customer service, please 

verify your address and provide a point of contact for our Ratesetting Services correspondence 

file. 

Sincerely, 

Lawrence J. Bauman 

Manager, Ratesetting Services 

Business Resources Center 

Enclosure
EX-10.7





 Exhibit 10.7 

Amendment 
 To the 

AMENDED AND RESTATED SERVICES AGREEMENT 

By and between 
 HOT TOPIC, INC. and
TORRID LLC 
 Dated August 1, 2019 

Hot Topic, Inc. (“Hot Topic”) and Torrid LLC (“Torrid”) entered into an Amended and Restated Services Agreement on
March 21, 2019 under which Hot Topic provides certain services to Torrid (the “Services Agreement”), and a Services Agreement effectives as of August 1, 2019 under which Torrid provides certain services to Hot Topic (the
“Reverse Services Agreement”). As the assets, personnel and other resources used to provide the information technology services from Hot Topic to Torrid have now been transferred to Torrid in connection with the Reverse Services Agreement,
and Torrid is now the provider of information technology services to Hot Topic under the Reverse Services Agreement, Hot Topic and Torrid (a) hereby amend the Services Agreement to remove Schedule 1 of the Services Agreement and any references
thereto and provisions applicable thereto in the body of the Services Agreement, (b) acknowledge and agree that, without limiting any other agreement between the parties relating to cost allocation and recovery, there shall be no termination
charges or other costs or expenses borne by either party under the Services Agreement with respect to the cessation of the provision of information technology services thereunder, and (c) further acknowledge and agree that all information
technology services between the parties are addressed in the Reverse Services Agreement. 
  

									
	TORRID LLC	 		 	HOT TOPIC, INC.
					
	By:	 	/s/ Dennis Secor	 		 	By:	 	/s/ George Wehlitz
	Name:   Dennis Secor	 		 	Name:   George Wehlitz
	Title:     CFO	 		 	Title:     CFO


  
 1
#### § 3862.3 Possessory rights.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neoware Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith
D. Schneck, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
     contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
     financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Keith D. Schneck
--------------------
Keith D. Schneck
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
May 15, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §64. Services of agents dispensed with

It shall be the duty of the President to dispense with the services of such Indian agents and superintendents as may be practicable; and where it is practicable he shall require the same person to perform the duties of two agencies or superintendencies for one salary.

(R.S. §2053; June 22, 1874, ch. 389, §1, 18 Stat. 147; Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 132, §1, 18 Stat. 421.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2053 derived from act Feb. 14, 1873, ch. 138, §1, 17 Stat. 437.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Indian Agents

In a communication, dated November 29, 1940, from the Office of Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior, it was stated that there have been no Indian agents since 1908, all of the agencies and schools having been placed under the supervision of superintendents.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Otto H. Schultze, Appellant, v. Israel L. Feinberg and Others, Individually and as Coroners, etc., Respondents.

Order affirmed,' with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2009
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Report), we, John A. B. Davies, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, and Neal A. Petrovich, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(a) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John A. B. Davies, Jr.John A. B. Davies, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerDate: April 23, 2010/s/ Neal A. PetrovichNeal A. PetrovichChief Financial OfficerDate: April 23, 2010
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J. Cowan, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Date: May 13, 2009 | /s/ Mark J. Cowan       |
|--------------------|-------------------------|
|               | Mark J. Cowan           |
|               | President and Treasurer |

 

 

 

10
**FORM 10-Q**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

 

**(Mark One)**

|   | (X) | **QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008**

 

**OR**

 

|   | (  ) | **TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | **For the transition period** | **to** |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|

 

**Commission file number****1-11394**

 

**MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.**

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

| **Delaware**                    | **95-3863205**      |
|---------------------------------|---------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer    |
| incorporation or organization)  | Identification No.) |

 

| **402 West County Road D, St. Paul, Minnesota** | **55112**  |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------|
| (Address of principal executive offices)        | (Zip Code) |

 

Registrant's telephone number including area code:**(651) 636-7466**

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

|   | Yes [ X ] | No [ | ] |
|--------|-----------|------|---|

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.          

| Large accelerated filer [ | ] | Accelerated filer [ X ] | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company  [ | ] |
|---------------------------|---|-------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------|---|

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 

|   | Yes [ | ] | No [ X ] |
|--------|-------|---|----------|

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

 

| Class                                   |   | Outstanding at April 17, 2008 |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Common Stock, $0.15 par value per share |   | 8,456,623                     |

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22292]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3633; State of West Virginia 
(Amendment <greek-i>1)

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
September 24, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
include Berkeley, Cabell, Jackson, Kanawha, Lincoln, Mason, Morgan, and 
Wood Counties as disaster areas due to damages caused by severe storms, 
flooding and landslides occurring on September 16, 2004, and 
continuing.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous counties of Boone, Clay, Fayette, 
Hampshire, Jefferson, Logan, Mingo, Nicholas, Putnam, Raleigh, and 
Wayne in the State of West Virginia; Athens, Gallia, Lawrence, and 
Meigs in the State of Ohio; Allegany and Washington Counties in the 
State of Maryland; and Clarke and Frederick Counties in the 
Commonwealth of Virginia may be filed until the specified date at the 
previously designated location. All other counties contiguous to the 
above named primary counties have previously been declared.
    The economic injury number assigned to Maryland is 9AA200 and 
Virginia is 9AA300.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is November 19, 2004 and for 
economic injury the deadline is June 20, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: September 27, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-22292 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P