alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Robert L. Gerry, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 10, 2008
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

s/ D. Aldana

Southern District of Florida

LEE MITCHELL JOHNSON

20-80709-CV-RUIZ

Plaintiff(s)

v.

DEPUTY WILLIAMS, et al.,

Lee Mitchell Johnson, PRO SE

0384240

Palm Beach County DC

P.O. Box 1450

Belle Glade, FL 33430

11/30/2020

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

Deputy P. Tyson,

Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office

3228 Gun Club Road

West Palm Beach, FL 33406

Case 9:20-cv-80709-RAR Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

20-80709-CV-RUIZ

0.00

Deputy P. Tyson,

Case 9:20-cv-80709-RAR Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2020 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Michael N. Chang, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kof Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including anyconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 26, 2008

 
| /s/ Michael N. Chang                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael N. Chang                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4668 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 519
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4668

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 400 North Main Street in Belen, New Mexico, as the ``U.S. Senator 
                      Dennis Chavez Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2022

Mr. Heinrich (for himself and Mr. Lujan) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           September 28, 2022

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 400 North Main Street in Belen, New Mexico, as the ``U.S. Senator 
                      Dennis Chavez Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. U.S. SENATOR DENNIS CHAVEZ POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 400 North Main Street in Belen, New Mexico, shall be known 
and designated as the ``U.S. Senator Dennis Chavez Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``U.S. 
Senator Dennis Chavez Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 519

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4668

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 400 North Main Street in Belen, New Mexico, as the ``U.S. Senator 
                      Dennis Chavez Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 2022

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Giles *v.*Giles, administrator.

Lumpkin, J.

1. Whére a decedent left a small estate estimated at less than five hundred dollars in value, and was survived by a widow and children by a former wife, and after his death, but before the appointment of an adininistrator, the widow entered into a contract with the children, whereby she received fifty dollars in lieu of any claim upon the estate, including a year’s support, if such contract was made without fraud and with knowledge of her rights and of the condition of the *684estate, it would operate as a bar 'to a subsequent application for a year’s support.

February 15, 1911.

Tear’s support. Before Judge Edwards. Douglas superior court. December 21, 1909.

*W. A. James,*for plaintiff.

*Robert & Hutcheson*and *J. 8. James,*for defendant.

2. Whether or not the charges complained of were in all respects accurate, they contained no such error as requires a reversal.

Judgment. *affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
(No. 902

Claimant awarded $171.43.)

#### The Texas Company, a Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Franchise *tax*— when *claimant entitled to refund.*There being no dispute as to the facts and law in this case the court enters an award in favor of claimant.

T. J. Sullivan, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for the refund of franchise tax paid into the office of the Secretary of State erroneously and it appearing by stipulation filed by the Attorney General that the claimant is entitled to a refund in the sum of $171.43, and therefor by such consent and from the examination of the records this court recommends an allowance of the sum of $171.43 to the claimant.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of LITFUNDING, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Amended Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  May 10, 2007   /s/  Terry Gabby ------------------------ Terry Gabby Chief  Financial  Officer
### §668. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–312, §1, June 14, 1972, 86 Stat. 216, which related to the sale of lands held by the United States, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
year dv year dv

2004 17.30 Baseline 2004 17.19

2018 14.93 2018 14.73

2028 13.24 2028 12.97

2038 11.55 2038 11.22

2048 9.86 2048 9.46

2058 8.17 2058 7.70

2064 7.16 Natural Conditions 2064 6.65

Big Bend Slope -0.169

Guadalupe Mountains slope -0.176

Big Bend Guadalupe Mtns

17.30

14.93

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2004 2014 2024

Haze Index (dv)

URP for Big 

17.19

14.73

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2004 2014 2024

Haze Index (dv)

URP for Guadalup
13.24

11.55

9.86

8.17

7.16

2024 2034 2044 2054 2064

Year

URP for Big Bend

12.97

11.22

9.46

7.70

6.65

2024 2034 2044 2054 2064

Year

URP for Guadalupe Mountains
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComparison of Observed Beta Cloth Interactions with Simulated and Actual Space EnvironmentA common component of multilayer insulation blankets is beta cloth, a woven fiberglass cloth impregnated with Teflon(TM). It is planned for extensive use on the International Space Station. The Environmental Etl'ects Group of the Marshall Space Flight Center Materials, Processing, and Manufacturing Department has investigated the impact of atomic oxygen (AO) and ultraviolet (UV) radiation on the optical properties of plain and aluminized beta cloth. both in the laboratory and as part of long-duration flight experiments. These investigations indicate that beta cloth is susceptible to darkening in the presence of UV radiation, dependent on the additives used. AO interactions resulted in bleaching of the beta cloth.Document ID19990103958Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKamenetzy, R. R.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Finckenor, M. M.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1999Subject CategoryMaterials ProcessingReport/Patent NumberM-936NAS 1.15:209575NASA/TM-1999-209575Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990103958.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
|EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Richard J. Braun, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        |                           
|----------------------- | --------------------------
|Dated:   April 27, 2006 | By:   /s/ Richard J. Braun
|                        | Richard J. Braun          
|                        | Chief Executive Officer   

|32
|--
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 707.04

 707.29

 707.52

 707.02

 707.28

 707.50

 707.61

 707.71

 708.00

 708.19

 707.42

 707.65

 707.83

 708.00

 708.13

 707.11

 707.33

 707.54

 707.70

 707.87

 708.05

 708.19

 708.34

 707.16

 707.21

 707.44

 707.62

 707.28

 707.44

 707.63

 778

 785

 792

 778

 785

 791

 794

 797

 805

 810

 789

 795

 800

 805

 809

 780

 786

 792

 797

 801

 806

 810

 815

 781

 783

 789

 794

 785

 789

 795

STORAGE

-14

+7

+7

-14

+7

+6

+3

+3

+8

+5

-21

+6

+5

+5

+4

-29

+6

+6

+5

+4

+5

+4

+5

-34

+2

+6

+5

-9

+4

+6

CHANGE

-4

5

4

-3

4

4

3

3

5

4

-6

4

4

4

3

-8

3

4

4

3

3

3

4

-9

2

4

4

-1

3

4

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 1

 0

 4

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 5

 1

 1

 1

 1

 7

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 8

 1

 1

 1

 4

 1

 1

 1045

 1000

 1005

 1100

TIME

 .20

 .22

 .20

 .18

COPPER

 .62

 .64

 .69

 .60

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2006 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 20, 2006

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +3 57 0 51

ACRE-FEET +3 113 0 101

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 101

 101

 792

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .001

 .001

 .002

Table 7
EXHIBIT 4.2


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM


We have issued our report dated June 8, 2021
with respect to the statements of condition including the related portfolios of ETF Allocation Portfolio 2021-2 and ETF Diversified
Income Portfolio 2021-2 (included in Invesco Unit Trusts, Series 2137) as of June 8, 2021 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-255366) and Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in this Registration
Statement and Prospectus and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Other Matters-Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm”.









/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP




New York, New York

June 8, 2021
§ 3217.15 What does BLM need to approve my drilling or development contract? For BLM to approve your drilling or development contract, you must send us: ( a ) The contract and a statement of why you need it;
( b ) A statement of all interests held by the contracting parties in that geothermal area or field;
( c ) The type of operations and schedule set by the contract;
( d ) A statement that the contract will not violate Federal antitrust laws by concentrating control over the production or sale of geothermal resources; and
( e ) Any other information we may require to make a decision about the contract or to attach conditions of approval.
### §473a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 473a was editorially reclassified as section 5119 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      232
<ALLOWANCES>                                        61
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   957
<PP&E>                                             609
<DEPRECIATION>                                     460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,183
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,924
<COMMON>                                        10,427
<OTHER-SE>                                     (22,428)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,106
<SALES>                                            149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   149
<CGS>                                              441
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,273)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,273)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,273)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.40)



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 614

 617

 618

 621

 624

 615

 621

 624

 625

 625

 625

 628

 630

 629

 630

 632

 633

 636

 647

 645

 645

 653

 656

 658

 661

 664

 667

 673

 673

 678

 694

 604

 607

 598

 611

 583

 562

 585

 588

 616

 617

 562

 617

 618

 620

 618

 624

 625

 627

 630

 626

 635

 640

 646

 649

 651

 654

 657

 659

 662

 665

 668

 608

 610

 612

 614

 613

 597

 607

 613

 619

 620

 618

 621

 622

 623

 624

 626

 628

 630

 634

 635

 639

 646

 650

 653

 655

 657

 661

 665

 666

 669

 673

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER