alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GREAT AMERICAN FINANCIAL RESOURCES, INC.



EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002









In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Great American Financial Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,     the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













|/s/ S.Craig LindnerS. Craig Lindner
Chief Executive Officer | /s/ Christopher P. MilianoChristopher P. Miliano
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



August 8, 2006



A signed original of this written statement will be retained by the Registrant

and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §1397F. Regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of parts II and III, including—

(1) regulations limiting the benefit of parts II and III in circumstances where such benefits, in combination with benefits provided under other Federal programs, would result in an activity being 100 percent or more subsidized by the Federal Government,

(2) regulations preventing abuse of the provisions of parts II and III, and

(3) regulations dealing with inadvertent failures of entities to be enterprise zone businesses.

(Added Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13301(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 555, §1397D; renumbered §1397F, Pub. L. 105–34, title II, §226(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 820; amended Pub. L. 105–206, title VI, §6004(g)(1), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 796.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–206 amended directory language of Pub. L. 105–34, §226(a). See 1997 Amendment note below.

1997—Pub. L. 105–34, §226(a), as amended by Pub. L. 105–206, renumbered section 1397D of this title as this section.
### **Subchapter I—Miscellaneous General Provisions**

Sec.
5551.
General provisions relating to bonds.
5552.
Installation of meters, tanks, and other apparatus.
5553.
Supervision of premises and operations.
5554.
Pilot operations.
5555.
Records, statements, and returns.
5556.
Regulations.
5557.
Officers and agents authorized to investigate, issue search warrants, and prosecute for violations.
5558.
Authority of enforcement officers.
5559.
Determinations.
5560.
Other provisions applicable.
5561.
Exemptions to meet the requirements of the national defense.
5562.
Exemptions from certain requirements in cases of disaster.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter I consisted of sections 5551 to 5557, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-60954-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

LOTTIE BARRIONUEVO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HEALTHCARE REVENUE

RECOVERY GROUP, LLC,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

AMENDED1 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice 

[DE 14], (the “Stipulation”), filed herein on August 31, 2020. The Court has considered the 

Stipulation and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Stipulation [DE 14] is APPROVED;

2. This case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice;

3. The case shall remain CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 1st day of September, 2020.

 1 This Amended Order replaces the Court’s previous Order of Dismissal [DE 15] and is amended to correct a 

scrivener’s error in the Order title. 

Case 0:20-cv-60954-WPD Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2020 Page 1 of 2
Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 0:20-cv-60954-WPD Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2020 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending  September 30, 2018 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures
Inc.





|Date: April 10, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|-------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                     |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
San Mateo, CA
                                                          February 26, 1999
                                                          $75,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000), with interest from the
date  hereof at a rate of ten percent  (10%) per annum,  which  amount  shall be
secured  by all of the  assets  of  Borrower.  Said  principal  shall be due and
payable on demand by  Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,  but in no
event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred eighty (180) days after
the date of this Note. This Note may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1. Subordination - Creditor  subordinates to Imperial Bank ("Bank") any
security  interest or lien that  Creditor  may have in any property of Borrower.
All Subordinated  Debt is subordinated in right of payment to all obligations of
Borrower to Bank now existing or hereafter arising.

         2.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         3. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         4.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 26 day of February, 1999.

                                              Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                              By: __________________

                                              Title: ________________
#### Rocco Perla, Respondent, v. Julius F. Wingenbach, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
#### § 3583.1 Other applicable regulations.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, (the Form
10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 8, 2006
    
    /s/ David P. Suleski

David P. Suleski
Chief Accounting Officer
AirlinePassengers.org1

Recommendations to 

Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection

June 28, 2012 

1. Comparison Shopping for Airline Fares and Hidden Ancillary 

Charges 

The Advisory Committee should urge DOT not to let its proposed passenger 

rights rulemaking – relating to side-by-side comparison of airline fares and 

fees by consumers - slip any further than absolutely necessary for all 

comments received in response to the NPRM to be fairly considered. 

2. Legislation to Refund Unused Federal Aviation Ticket Taxes 

The Advisory Committee’s support is needed so that the DOT Secretary’s first 

report to Congress next February will recommend that Congress amend the 

Federal aviation tax statute to allow passengers to get refunds for Federal 

taxes paid on unused tickets purchased with non-refundable fares. 

3. Enforceability of Provisions in Carriers’ Contracts of Carriage 

The Advisory Committee should request that DOT ‘s Office of Inspector 

General over the next year: 

(a) Review the airlines’ Contracts of Carriage to determine whether 

their provisions are often so hedged by legalese (e.g., “to the extent possible”) 

that “passenger rights” are not practically enforceable in state courts 

(including small claims courts); and 

(b) Review past Federal litigation as to whether the Federal preemption 

provision of state regulation of airline “services” has been so broadly 

interpreted that it should be narrowed by Congress when the next FAA 

Reauthorization Act is enacted in 2015. 

P.O. Box 42142, Washington, D.C. 20015 Reply to: contact@airlinepassengers.org

 

1 These recommendations are also endorsed by the Association for Airline Passenger Rights (AAPR).
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4834 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.4834

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Resources, Officers, and 
Technology to Eradicate Cyber Threats to Our Children Act of 2022'' or 
the ``PROTECT Our Children Act of 2022''.
SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.
    Section 107(a)(10) of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 (34 
U.S.C. 21117(a)(10)) is amended by striking ``2022'' and inserting 
``2024''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
- CtrSpecExh1SutterAtt7: Contractor SpecificSutter Exhibit 1, Attach. 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5


<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                            Jul-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                                       600,180
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              5,073,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 110,000
<INVENTORY>                                                  134,398
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   0
<PP&E>                                                       763,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                               112,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             6,884,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        127,523
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                      11,083
<OTHER-SE>                                                 4,881,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               6,884,875
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           1,232,833
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           1,276,279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             372,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (415,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (415,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (415,446)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (0.054)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (0.054)


</TABLE>
### **Subchapter G—Penalties and Forfeitures**

Sec.
5761.
Civil penalties.
5762.
Criminal penalties.
5763.
Forfeitures.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10512(f)(1), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–449, redesignated subchapter F as G.

**1965**—Pub. L. 89–44, title V, §502(b)(7), June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 151, redesignated subchapter G as F. Former subchapter F redesignated E.

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §202, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1425, substituted "Penalties and Forfeitures" for "Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures" in subchapter heading.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 2:20-CV-14148-ROSENBERG/MAYNARD 

NUSRAT RIZVI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EXPERIAN, 

Defendant. 

____________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND CLOSING CASE 

This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment. DE 22. The Court previously referred the Motion for Summary 

Judgment to the Honorable Shaniek M. Maynard for a Report and Recommendation. DE 37. 

Judge Maynard issued a Report and Recommendation on August 2, 2021, recommended that the 

Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. DE 48. 

 Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to file 

Objections has expired. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the briefing and evidence 

submitted for the Motion for Summary Judgment, the Report and Recommendation, and the 

entire record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the analysis 

and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation and finds Judge Maynard’s recommendation 

to be well reasoned and correct. 

Case 2:20-cv-14148-RLR Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2021 Page 1 of 2
2 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. Magistrate Judge Maynard’s Report and Recommendation [DE 48] is ADOPTED as the 

Order of the Court. 

2. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

[DE 22] is GRANTED. 

3. Within three business days of the date of this Order, Defendant shall email to the Court 

(Rosenberg@flsd.uscourts.gov) a proposed Final Judgment in Word format. 

4. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to CLOSE THIS CASE. All pending motions are 

DENIED AS MOOT, all hearings are CANCELED, and all deadlines are 

TERMINATED. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, West Palm Beach, Florida, this 23rd day of 

August, 2021. 

 _______________________________ 

 ROBIN L. ROSENBERG 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies furnished to: 

Plaintiff 

Counsel of Record 

Case 2:20-cv-14148-RLR Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2021 Page 2 of 2
### §5201. Acquisition of agricultural and grazing lands for Indians; title to lands; tax exemption

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to acquire by purchase, relinquishment, gift, exchange, or assignment, any interest in lands, water rights, or surface rights to lands, within or without existing Indian reservations, including trust or otherwise restricted lands now in Indian ownership: Provided, That such lands shall be agricultural and grazing lands of good character and quality in proportion to the respective needs of the particular Indian or Indians for whom such purchases are made. Title to all lands so acquired shall be taken in the name of the United States, in trust for the tribe, band, group, or individual Indian for whose benefit such land is so acquired, and while the title thereto is held by the United States said lands shall be free from any and all taxes, save that the State of Oklahoma is authorized to levy and collect a gross-production tax, not in excess of the rate applied to production from lands in private ownership, upon all oil and gas produced from said lands, which said tax the Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to cause to be paid.

(June 26, 1936, ch. 831, §1, 49 Stat. 1967.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 501 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Act June 26, 1936, ch. 831, 49 Stat. 1967, which enacted this chapter, is popularly known as the "Oklahoma Welfare Act" and the "Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act".

#### References to This Section

References to this section in chapter 46 of this title deemed to include section 82a of this title, see section 5391 of this title.
#### Planet Merchandise Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Herman A. Lipper et al., Copartners Trading as Lipper & Mann, Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### **Subchapter B—Tax on Employee Representatives**

Sec.
3211.
Rate of tax.
3212.
Determination of compensation.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Miami Division 

Case No.: 20-22051-CIV-MARTINEZ-OTAZO-REYES 

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 3G 

LICENSING S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HMD AMERICA, INC. and HMD 

GLOBAL OY, 

Defendants. 

DEFENDANTS’ RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendants HMD America, Inc. and 

HMD Global Oy, by and through counsel, disclose as follows. 

HMD America Inc. is a privately held wholly-owned subsidiary of HMD Global Oy. 

HMD Global Oy has no parent corporation. No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of 

HMD Global Oy’s stock. 

Dated: September 4, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Joseph W. Bain 

JOSEPH W. BAIN, ESQ. 

Florida Bar No. 860360 

Email Address: jbain@shutts.com 

SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP 

1100 CityPlace Tower 

525 Okeechobee Boulevard 

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 

Telephone: (561) 835-8500 

Facsimile: (561) 650-8530 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS HMD 

AMERICA, INC. AND HMD GLOBAL OY

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are 

being served with a copy of this document on September 4, 2020. 

 /s/ Joseph W. Bain 

 Joseph W. Bain 

59906489 v1 

Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2020 Page 2 of 2
Mr. Donald S. Welsh

Regional Administrator

EPA Region III (3APOO)

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

Dear Mr. Welsh:

I am enclosing a demonstration showing how Pennsylvania has satisfied the requirement

for State Implementation Plans (SIPs) required under Section 1 10(a)(2)(K) ofthe Clean Air Act

(CAA) for the fine particulate matter (PM2.5)National Ambient Air Quality Standard adopted in

1997.

This SIP revision was available for a 30-day public comment period and a public hearing

was held on April 10, 2008. No comments were received. Evidence of public notification is

enclosed. These procedures meet the public participation requirements ofthe CAA and the

Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control Act.

Should you have any questions concerning this SIP revision, please contact

Joyce E. Epps, Director ofthe Bureau of Air Quality, by e-mail atjeepps@state.pa.us or by

telephone at 717-787-9702.Enclosure

Printed on Recycled Paper

An Equal Opportunity Employer www.dep.state.pa.us
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Kowalsky, Deceased. John Kowalsky, Appellant; Ferdinand D. Virgilio, as Executor of Mary Kowalsky, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.