alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting,
Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 31, 2004



/S/    DAVID S.
SMITHDavid S. SmithPresident and Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer)




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 3585.1 Lands to which applicable.

The lands subject to the regulations in this subpart are within the White Mountains National Recreation Area—Alaska which have been opened to mineral leasing and development pursuant to the findings in the land use plan for the area that such use and development would be compatible with, or would not significantly impair, public recreation and conservation of the scenic, scientific, historic, fish and wildlife or other values contributing to public enjoyment. The land use plan is on file and available for public inspection in the Bureau's Fairbanks District Office.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                            SCOPUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
            STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              (UNAUDITED)         (UNAUDITED)
                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED   NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                             DECEMBER 31,        DECEMBER 31,
                                          -------------------  -----------------
                                            1996      1997       1996     1997
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)     --------- ---------  -------- --------
<S>                                       <C>       <C>        <C>      <C>
BASIC
Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding............................     18,663    20,521    18,062   20,420
                                          --------- ---------  -------- --------
Number of shares for computation of net
 income (loss) per share................     18,663    20,521    18,062   20,420
                                          ========= =========  ======== ========
Net income (loss).......................  $   2,660 $    (877) $  5,009 $  2,706
                                          ========= =========  ======== ========
Net income (loss) per share.............  $    0.14 $   (0.04) $   0.28 $   0.13
                                          ========= =========  ======== ========
<CAPTION>
                                              (UNAUDITED)         (UNAUDITED)
                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED   NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                             DECEMBER 31,        DECEMBER 31,
                                          -------------------  -----------------
                                            1996      1997       1996     1997
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)     --------- ---------  -------- --------
<S>                                       <C>       <C>        <C>      <C>
DILUTED
Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding............................     18,663    20,521    18,062   20,420
Shares issuable pursuant to options
 granted under employee stock option
 plan, less assumed repurchased at the
 ending fair market value for the
 period.................................      1,548       --      1,483    1,284
                                          --------- ---------  -------- --------
Number of shares for computation of net
 income (loss) per share................     20,211    20,521    19,545   21,704
                                          ========= =========  ======== ========
Net income (loss).......................  $   2,660 $    (877) $  5,009 $  2,706
                                          ========= =========  ======== ========
Net income (loss) per share.............  $    0.13 $   (0.04) $   0.26 $   0.12
                                          ========= =========  ======== ========
</TABLE>
 
                                    Page 20
### -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

38.5 39.0 39.5


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/22 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
§ 3150.0-1 Purpose. The purpose of this part is to establish procedures for conducting oil and gas geophysical exploration operations when authorization for such operations is required from the Bureau of Land Management. Geophysical exploration on public lands, the surface of which is administered by the Bureau, requires Bureau approval. The procedures in this part also apply to geophysical exploration conducted under the rights granted by any Federal oil and gas lease unless the surface is administered by the U.S. Forest Service. However, a lessee may elect to conduct exploration operations outside of the rights granted by the lease, in which case authorization from the surface managing agency or surface owner may be required. At the request of any other surface managing agency, the procedures in this part may be applied on a case-by-case basis to unleased public lands administered by such agency. The procedures of this part do not apply to: ( a ) Casual use activities;
( b ) Operations conducted on private surface overlying public lands unless such operations are conducted by a lessee under the rights granted by the Federal oil and gas lease; and
( c ) Exploration operations conducted in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in accordance with section 1002 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (See 50 CFR part 37).
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KENNETH COLEMAN,

Petitioner

v.

HON. CHRIS R. WOGAN,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 187 EM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of January, 2017

, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and the Application for the Assignment of Counsel are DENIED

.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CALVIN JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 374 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

and Motion to Clarify are DENIED.
### §102. Gifts and inheritances

#### (a) General rule

Gross income does not include the value of property acquired by gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance.

#### (b) Income

Subsection (a) shall not exclude from gross income—

(1) the income from any property referred to in subsection (a); or

(2) where the gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance is of income from property, the amount of such income.

Where, under the terms of the gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance, the payment, crediting, or distribution thereof is to be made at intervals, then, to the extent that it is paid or credited or to be distributed out of income from property, it shall be treated for purposes of paragraph (2) as a gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance of income from property. Any amount included in the gross income of a beneficiary under subchapter J shall be treated for purposes of paragraph (2) as a gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance of income from property.

#### (c) Employee gifts

#### (1) In general

Subsection (a) shall not exclude from gross income any amount transferred by or for an employer to, or for the benefit of, an employee.

#### (2) Cross references

**For provisions excluding certain employee achievement awards from gross income, see section 74(c).**

**For provisions excluding certain de minimis fringes from gross income, see section 132(e).**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 28; Pub. L. 99–514, title I, §122(b), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2110.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–514 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–514 applicable to prizes and awards granted after Dec. 31, 1986, see section 151(c) of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
OMB Control No. 2060-0336 

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL OPERATING PERMIT, 40 CFR PART 71 

APPLICATION FORM GIS - GENERAL INFORMATION AND SUMMARY 

Instructions: Complete this form once for the part 71 source (facility). 

A. Mailing Address and Contact Information 

Facility name ______________________________________________________________________ 

Mailing address: Street or P.O. Box _______________________________________________________________ 

City __________________________________________ State _______ ZIP ___________ - ________ 

Contact person: _________________________________________ Title ____________________________________ 

Telephone ( ______ ) ________ - ___________ Ext. _________ Facsimile ( _______ ) ________ - ___________ 

B. Facility Location 

Temporary source? ___ Yes ___ No Plant site location __________________________________________________ 

City __________________________________ State _______ County ____________ EPA Region ________

Is the facility located within:

Indian lands? ___YES ___ NO OCS waters? ___YES ___ NO

Nonattainment area? ___ YES ___ NO If yes, for what air pollutants? __________

Within 50 miles of affected State? ___ YES ___ NO If yes, What State(s)? _____________

C. Owner 

Name _______________________________________________ Street/ P.O. Box ________________________________ 

City _________________________________________ State _______ ZIP ____________ - ________ 

Telephone ( _______ ) ________ - ____________ Ext. _________ 

D. Operator 

Name _______________________________________________ Street/ P.O. Box ________________________________ 

City _________________________________________ State _______ ZIP ____________ - ________ 

Telephone ( _______ ) ________ - ____________ Ext. _________
================================================================================

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                             Date: February 15, 2007

                        Commission File Number: 001-32305

                                    CORPBANCA
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                         Huerfanos 1072, Santiago, Chile
                     ---------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                    Form 20-F [X]                 Form 40-F [ ]

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                    Yes [ ]                       No [X]

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.

================================================================================
<PAGE>

     On February 13, 2007, CORPBANCA announced its financial results for the
2006 fiscal year. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit
99.1.
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 15, 2007

                                                  CORPBANCA


                                                  By: /s/ Mario Chamorro Carrizo
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name:  Mario Chamorro Carrizo
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit   Description
-------   ----------------------------------------------------------------------

99.1      CORPBANCA press release, dated February 13, 2007, announcing its
          financial results for the 2006 fiscal year.
#### Abraham Schultz et al., Respondents, v. Morris Simon, Appellant.

Present — Rolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
### §590b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–442, §2, Sept. 29, 1972, 86 Stat. 744, which related to disposition of funds credited to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn expert system for planning and scheduling in a telerobotic environmentA knowledge based approach to assigning tasks to multi-agents working cooperatively in jobs that require a telerobot in the loop was developed. The generality of the approach allows for such a concept to be applied in a nonteleoperational domain. The planning architecture known as the task oriented planner (TOP) uses the principle of flow mechanism and the concept of planning by deliberation to preserve and use knowledge about a particular task. The TOP is an open ended architecture developed with a NEXPERT expert system shell and its knowledge organization allows for indirect consultation at various levels of task abstraction. Considering that a telerobot operates in a hostile and nonstructured environment, task scheduling should respond to environmental changes. A general heuristic was developed for scheduling jobs with the TOP system. The technique is not to optimize a given scheduling criterion as in classical job and/or flow shop problems. For a teleoperation job schedule, criteria are situation dependent. A criterion selection is fuzzily embedded in the task-skill matrix computation. However, goal achievement with minimum expected risk to the human operator is emphasized.Document ID19910018562Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsNtuen, Celestine A.*(North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State Univ. Greensboro, NC, United States)*Park, Eui H.*(North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State Univ. Greensboro, NC, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1991Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:188648NASA-CR-188648Accession Number91N27876Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-763Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910018562.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
by

Sandra S. Schulz and Robert E. Wallace



The San Andreas FaultSan Andreas fault in the Carrizo Plain, central California
(Photo by Robert E. Wallace)





---

Accessibility
            FOIA
            Privacy
            Policies and Notices U.S. Department of the Interior |
            U.S. Geological Survey
           	URL: *http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/gip/earthq3/index.html*
            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact
           	Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 30-Nov-2016 12:12:25 EST
#### In the Matter of Howard C. Shoen et al., Doing Business as North Shore Day School, Respondents, against Herbert S. Bowne et al., Consti*1021tuting the Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Glen Cove et al., Appellants.

Order directing the building inspector of the City of Glen Cove to issue a certificate of occupancy for the use of certain premises as a school, decreeing that the activities conducted upon the premises during the summer of 1947 constituted the respondents a private school within the purview of the Building Zone Ordinance of the City of Glen Cove, and setting aside the contrary determinations of the city building inspector and of the Glen Cove zoning board of appeals, reversed on the law and the facts, and the determination of the zoning board of appeals that the 1947 summer use of the premises violated the zoning ordinance reinstated and confirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. The evidence presented to the zoning board of appeals by the respondents clearly indicates that the primary purpose of the activities conducted on the premises during the summer of 1947 was recreational rather than educational. The respondents were not registered by the State Department of Education to conduct even a nursery school thereon until after this proceeding was instituted. Special Term, therefore, should not have disturbed the board’s determination that the 1947 summer activities, as to children over nursery school age, were conducted in violation of subdivision 3 of section 2-a of the zoning ordinance. That section permits “ school ” uses in a residence AA district, but does not allow the maintenance therein of a summer camp. Upon the proof in this record, it does not appear that the determination of the zoning board of appeals was either arbitrary, capricious or unjustified. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 345

 346

 389

 383

 373

 383

 393

 389

 423

 403

 414

 425

 438

 427

 433

 443

 446

 451

 453

 473

 470

 465

 462

 468

 460

 451

 445

 436

 422

 409

 307

 309

 298

 314

 338

 299

 333

 343

 324

 334

 369

 392

 387

 354

 377

 383

 409

 392

 390

 402

 410

 408

 403

 420

 392

 397

 392

 379

 365

 339

 330

 332

 357

 364

 358

 357

 373

 372

 386

 379

 393

 406

 416

 405

 412

 419

 428

 422

 438

 445

 448

 446

 439

 446

 441

 430

 422

 413

 404

 373

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 31, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 02, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 02, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0132. DON ARIAIL et al. v. WINDERMERE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 18CV0555
## TSCA Section 5(e) Consent Order

for Contract Manufacturer

Premanufacture Notice (PMN) P-95-1098
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 51325 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. KATINA ROCHELLE CANDRICK, also known as Katina Lofton,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:09 -CR- 178 -1

Before DENNIS, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Katina Rochelle Candrick, federal prisoner # 39629

- 177, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s denial of her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce her sentence based on Amendment 794 to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. By moving to proceed IFP, Candrick is challenging the district court’s certification that her appeal was not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Our inquiry into a

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 10, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-51325 Document: 00514110305 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2017No. 16

- 51325

2 litigant’s good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) ( internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The Supreme Court has prescribed a two

- step inquiry for a district court

t hat is considering a § 3582(c)(2) motion. Dillon v. United States , 560 U.S. 817, 826 (2010). The court must first determine whether a prisoner is eligible for a reduction as set forth in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a). Id . If s he is eligible, then the district court must “consider any applicable [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) factors and determine whether, in its discretion,” any reduction is warranted under the particular facts of the case. Id. at 827. We review the decision whether to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for an abuse of discretion. United States
v. Henderson , 636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011). Although Candrick conclusionally asserts that she is entitled to a
reduction , she abandons by failing to brief any argument challenging the district court’s determination that she is ineligible because Amendment 794 is not retroactively applicable. United States v. Charles, 469 F.3d 402, 408 (5th Cir. 2006). Even had she briefed the argument, it would fail because Amendment 794 is not listed in U.S.S.G. § 1B 1.10(d), p.s. , and thus has not been made retroactively applicable. See Dillon , 560 U.S. at 826

. Candrick therefore cannot show an abuse of discretion on the district court’s part. See Henderson , 636 F.3d at 717. She has failed to show that she will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Howard , 707 F.2d at 220. Accordingly, the IFP motion is DENIED. Additionally, because this appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 16-51325 Document: 00514110305 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/10/2017
#### Louisville & Nashville Railroad *Company v.*Gudger *et al.*

September 21, 1910.

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Murray superior court. March 1909.

*D.*IF. *Blair*and *G. N. King,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. E. Mann*and *G. L. Henry,*contra.

Beck, J.

The petition after amendment was not open to the objections made by demurrer; no error is shown in the court’s instructions to the jury; and there being sufficient evidence to authorize the finding in favor of the plaintiffs, the judgment of the court below refusing a new trial will not be disturbed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*