alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


            Each director and officer of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the
"Corporation"), whose signature appears below hereby appoints Michael J.
McMennamin and John D. Van Fleet, or any of them, as his or her
attorney-in-fact, to sign, in his or her name and behalf and in any and all
capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual
Report") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, and likewise to sign and
file any amendments, including post-effective amendments, to the Annual Report,
and the Corporation hereby also appoints such persons as its attorneys-in-fact
and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file
the Annual Report and any amendments thereto in its name and behalf, each such
person and the Corporation hereby granting to such attorney-in-fact full power
of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that such
attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of
Attorney, in counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 27, 2002.

DIRECTORS/OFFICERS:

          Signatures                                    Title
          ----------                                    -----


/s/  Michael J. McMennamin                      President
------------------------------                  (Principal Executive Officer)
      Michael J. McMennamin


/s/  John D. Van Fleet                          Vice President
------------------------------                  (Principal Accounting Officer)
      John D. Van Fleet


/s/ Richard A. Cheap                            Director
------------------------------------
     Richard A. Cheap


/s/ Stephen E. Dutton                           Director
------------------------------------
     Stephen E. Dutton


/s/ R. Larry Hoover                             Director
------------------------------------
     R. Larry Hoover


/s/ Edward J. Kane                              Director
------------------------------------
     Edward J. Kane


/s/ Roger E. Kephart                            Director
------------------------------------
     Roger E. Kephart


/s/ James D. Robbins                            Director
------------------------------------
     James D. Robbins


/s/ Paul V. Sebert                              Director
------------------------------------
     Paul V. Sebert
#### § 3873.2 Effect of decision that land is mineral.

The fact that a certain tract of land is decided upon testimony to the mineral in character is by no means equivalent to an award of the land to a miner. In order to secure a patent for such land, he must proceed as in other cases, in accordance with this part.
### Fw: CASAC comments on Dudley memo Tricia Crabtree to: Tricia Crabtree 01/06/2010 10:39 AM

Tricia Crabtree Environmental Protection Specialist EPA/OAQPS/HEID/OD (C504-02) Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5688 Fax: 919-685-3148 E-Mail: Crabtree.Tricia@epa.gov ----- Forwarded by Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/06/2010 10:39 AM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To: dmancini@omb.eop.gov, hking@omb.eop.gov Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/29/2009 11:01 AM Subject: CASAC comments on Dudley memo

Dom,

I just talked with Karen and we do need to make an edit to address CASAC's reference to the Dudley memo. We had missed that reference. We will make that change and send it along with the next revision we send to you, which will address the other issues we discussed today.

Lydia
(No. 899

Claimant awarded $7,500.00.)

#### Illinois Central Railroad Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1925.*

*Services*— when *State liable.*Where services have been rendered for the State at the request of its authorized Department, an award may he made to claimant for such services.

J. G. Drennan, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim filed by the Illinois Central Railroad Company on account of the failure of the State to pay claimant the sum of $7,500.00, according to the terms and conditions of a certain opinion and order of the Illinois Commerce Commission of the State of Illinois. It appears to this court that the matter has been fully adjudicated by the said Commission, and it further appears that the defendant, by its Attorney General, comes into this court on his own motion and admits that said demand is justified; that said sum should be paid the claimant.

Now therefore it is considered by this court that said claim be allowed and it is recommended that the claimant be allowed the sum of $7,500.00.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Wiersma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1)                   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)                   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   July 27, 2006 | By:   /s/ Kevin J. Wiersma                |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                   | Kevin J. Wiersma

Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

 

 

 
| 37 |
|----|
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ KLAUS BESIERKlaus BesierPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)May 10, 2007
  43
§ 4.1160 Scope. These regulations govern applications for review of— ( a ) Notices of violation or the modification, vacation, or termination of a notice of violation under section 521(a)(3) of the Act; and
( b ) Orders of cessation which are not subject to expedited review under § 4.1180 or the modification, vacation, or termination of such an order of cessation under section 521(a)(2) or section 521(a)(3).
79–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–797

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 4516, THE LEGISLATIVE

BRANCH APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001

JULY 27, 2000.—Ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 565]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 565, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the conference report to accompany H.R. 4516, the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001. The rule waives all points of order against the conference report and against its consideration. The rule further provides that the conference report shall be considered as read.

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 118

Date: July 27, 2000 (Legislative day of July 26, 2000).

Measure: Conference Report to Accompany H.R. 4516, The Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001.

Motion By: Mr. Goss.

Summary of Motion: To report the resolution.

Results: Adopted 8 to 2.

Vote by Member: Goss—Yea; Linder—Yea; Diaz-Balart—Yea;

Hastings—Yea; Myrick—Yea; Sessions—Yea; Reynolds—Yea;

Moakley—Nay; Frost—Nay; Dreier—Yea.

Æ
Grassland Water District

Note: Quantities shown below are acre-feet of water

 Source of Level 2 Sources of Incremental

Refuge Level 21 Water Supplies Incremental Level 42 Level 4 Water Supply Total Level 43

Water Supplies Contract Non-Project Water Supplies Contract Replacement Supplies

GRCD 125,000 125,00050 55,000 55,000 40 180,000

1

 Quantity as defined in Article 1(i) of this Contract

2

 Quantity as defined in Article 1(h) of this Contract 

3 Quantity as defined in Article 1(j) of this Contract

4

 To be acquired in accordance with Article 3(a) of this Contract

5 Quantity to be provided by this Contract (53,500 ac. ft. had been provided prior to CVPIA pursuant to contract no. 14-06-200-6106,

 dated September 13, 1956 and contract No. 14-06-200-3447A, dated August 4, 1967; these existing contracts will be suspended 

 as provided for in this Contract)

DRAFT 11/15/00
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIntegrated Cryogenic Experiment (ICE) microsphere investigationThe main objective is to determine the performance of microsphere insulation in a 0-g environment and compare its performance to reference insulations such as multilayer insulation. The Lockheed Helium Extended-Life Dewar (HELD) is used to provide superfluid-helium cold sink for the experiment. The use of HELD allows the low-g dynamic properties of Passive Orbital Disconnect Struts (PODS) to be characterized and provides a flight demonstration of the PODS system. The thermal performance of microspheres in 1 and 0 g was predicted, a flight experiment was designed to determine microsphere thermal performance, and the interface was also designed between the experimental package and the shuttle through HELD and the Hitchhiker-M carrier. A single test cell was designed and fabricated. The cell was filled with uncoated glass microspheres and tested with a liquid-nitrogen cold sink. The data were found to agree with predictions of microsphere performance in 1 g.Document ID19910010010Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSpradley, I.*(Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. Palo Alto, CA, United States)*Read, D.*(Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. Palo Alto, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1989Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:177538NASA-CR-177538LMSC-F279204Accession Number91N19323Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 244-10-00CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS2-12897Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910010010.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
San Mateo, CA
                                                              February 17, 2000
                                                              $300,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of three hundred thousand dollars  ($300,000),  with interest from
the date hereof at a rate of ten percent (10%) per annum,  which amount shall be
secured  by all of the  assets  of  Borrower.  Said  principal  shall be due and
payable on demand by  Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,  but in no
event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred eighty (180) days after
the date of this Note. This Note may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         2. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         3.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 17 day of February, 2000.

                                            Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                            By: __________________

                                            Title: ________________
### Subpart D—Accounting, Allocation, and Foreign Provisions

Sec.
811.
Accounting provisions.
812.
Definition of company's share and policyholders' share. 1

[813.
Repealed.]
814.
Contiguous country branches of domestic life insurance companies.
[815.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13514(a), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2143, struck out item 815 "Distributions to shareholders from pre-1984 policyholders surplus account".

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10242(c)(4), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–423, struck out item 813 "Foreign life insurance companies".

1  Section catchline amended by Pub. L. 115–97 without corresponding amendment of analysis.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIdentification of aerodynamic models for maneuvering aircraftDue to the requirement of increased performance and maneuverability, the flight envelope of a modern fighter is frequently extended to the high angle-of-attack regime. Vehicles maneuvering in this regime are subjected to nonlinear aerodynamic loads. The nonlinearities are due mainly to three-dimensional separated flow and concentrated vortex flow that occur at large angles of attack. Accurate prediction of these nonlinear airloads is of great importance in the analysis of a vehicle's flight motion and in the design of its flight control system. A satisfactory evaluation of the performance envelope of the aircraft may require a large number of coupled computations, one for each change in initial conditions. To avoid the disadvantage of solving the coupled flow-field equations and aircraft's motion equations, an alternate approach is to use a mathematical modeling to describe the steady and unsteady aerodynamics for the aircraft equations of motion. Aerodynamic forces and moments acting on a rapidly maneuvering aircraft are, in general, nonlinear functions of motion variables, their time rate of change, and the history of maneuvering. A numerical method was developed to analyze the nonlinear and time-dependent aerodynamic response to establish the generalized indicial function in terms of motion variables and their time rates of change.Document ID19900016627Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsChin, Suei*(Kansas Univ. Center for Research, Inc. Lawrence, KS, United States)*Lan, C. Edward*(Kansas Univ. Center for Research, Inc. Lawrence, KS, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186630KU-FRL-872-1NASA-CR-186630Accession Number90N25943Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-1087Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016627.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### The People of the State of New York v. Edward Pearlman and Aled Holding Corporation.

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 657.]
----

----

I Informacje

Rada

----

Informacje dotyczące przedłużenia Międzynarodowej Umowy w sprawie Drewna Tropikalnego z 1994 r.

(2005/C 237/01)

Na 34. sesji (Panama, 12-16 maja 2003 r.) Międzynarodowa Rada do spraw Drewna Tropikalnego postanowiła, w ramach art. 46 ust. 2 Międzynarodowej Umowy w sprawie Drewna Tropikalnego z 1994 r. (1), przedłużyć Umowę na okres trzech lat ze skutkiem od dnia 1 stycznia 2004 r. do dnia 31 grudnia 2006 r.

----

(1)Dz.U. L 208 z 17.8.1996, str. 1.

----

Komisja

----

Kursy walutowe euro (1)

26 września 2005

(2005/C 237/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Źródło: referencyjny kurs wymiany walut opublikowany przez ECB.

----

----

Szczegóły uzgodnień na temat elektronicznego przesyłania zgłoszeń dotyczących pomocy państwa, w tym adresów, wraz z uzgodnieniami dotyczącymi ochrony tajnych informacji

Art. 3 ust. 6 rozporządzenia Komisji (WE 794/2004) z dnia 21 kwietnia 2004 r. w sprawie wykonania rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 659/1999 ustanawiającego szczegółowe zasady stosowania art. 93 Traktatu WE

(2005/C 237/03)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

----

----

Uprzednie zgłoszenie koncentracji

(Sprawa nr COMP/M.3984 — Bain Fund Group/FCI)

Sprawa kwalifikująca się do rozpatrzenia w ramach procedury uproszczonej

(2005/C 237/04)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

----

(1)Dz.U. L 24 z 29.1.2004, str. 1.

(2)Dz.U. C 56 z 5.3.2005, str. 32.

----

----

Brak sprzeciwu wobec zgłoszonej koncentracji

(Sprawa nr COMP/M.3921 — Advent/Herlitz)

(2005/C 237/05)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

W dniu 19 września 2005 r. Komisja podjęła decyzję o nie sprzeciwianiu się wyżej wymienionej koncentracji oraz uznaniu jej za zgodną z regułami wspólnego rynku. Powyższa decyzja zostaje wydana na mocy art. 6 ust. 1 lit. b) rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 139/2004. Pełny tekst decyzji jest dostępny wyłącznie w języku niemieckim i będzie opublikowany po uprzednim usunięciu ewentualnych tajemnic handlowych przedsiębiorstw. Tekst decyzji będzie dostępny:

----

Sprostowania

----

Sprostowanie do zaproszenia do składania ofert (nr VIII-2006/01) — Linia budżetowa 4020 „Finansowanie europejskich partii politycznych”

(Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 141 z dnia 10 czerwca 2005 r.)

(2005/C 237/06)

Na str. 22, pkt 4.3 lit. e):

zamiast:

„przekazanie 80 % kwoty dofinansowania (15 dni po podpisaniu umowy)”;

powinno być:

„przekazanie 50 % kwoty dofinansowania (15 dni po podpisaniu umowy)”.

----
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin
Thorp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Lapis Technologies,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




February
15, 2008





/s/
Martin Thorp


_______________________________


Martin
Thorp


Chief
Financial Officer
### §301. Freedom from tolls

Except as provided in section 129 of this title with respect to certain toll bridges and toll tunnels, all highways constructed under the provisions of this title shall be free from tolls of all kinds.

(Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 912.)
§ 4.620 How must I file and serve documents? ( a ) You must file and serve all documents related to an application for an award under this subpart on all other parties to the proceeding in the same manner as other pleadings in the proceeding, except as provided in § 4.611(c) for confidential information. The Department or other agency and all other parties must likewise file and serve their pleadings and related documents on you and on each other, in the same manner as other pleadings in the proceeding.
( b ) A document may be electronically transmitted under the terms specified in the OHA Standing Orders on Electronic Transmission issued by the Director. When done in accordance with the Standing Orders, a document may be: ( 1 ) Filed by electronic transmission; and
( 2 ) Served on or transmitted to a person or party by electronic transmission if that person or party has consented to such means.
[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 88 FR 5794, Jan. 30, 2023]
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT





We
      hereby
      consent to the use in the annual report on Form 10-KSB for Atlantic Wine
      Agencies, Inc. f/k/a New England Acquisitions, Inc. ("Company"), dated on or
      about July 12, 2007, relating to the financial statements of the Company for
      the
      period ending March 31, 2007 and to the reference to our Firm under the Item
      entitled "Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
      Financial Disclosure" in the report.








/s/
              Meyler & Company , LLCMEYLER & COMPANY, LLCMiddletown, New JerseyJuly 12, 2007