This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

58879

Vol. 69, No. 190

Friday, October 1, 2004

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

[Docket Number FV–04–311] 

United States Standards for Grades of 

Kale

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, 

USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing 

Service (AMS), prior to undertaking 

research and other work associated with 

revising official grade standards, is 

soliciting comments on the possible 

revisions to the United States Standards 

for Grades of Kale. At a 2003 meeting 

with the Fruit and Vegetable Industry 

Advisory Committee, AMS was asked to 

review all the fresh fruit and vegetable 

grade standards for usefulness in 

serving the industry. As a result, AMS 

has identified that the current standard 

may need to be modified to allow that 

percentages are determined by count 

and not weight. Additionally, AMS is 

seeking comments regarding any other 

revisions that may be necessary to better 

serve the industry.

DATES: Comments must be received by 

November 30, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments to 

the Standardization Section, Fresh 

Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 

Programs, Agricultural Marketing 

Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 

1400 Independence Ave. SW., Room 

1661 South Building, Stop 0240, 

Washington, DC 20250–0240; Fax (202) 

720–8871, e-mail 

FPB.DocketClerk@usda.gov. Comments 

should make reference to the dates and 

page number of this issue of the Federal 

Register and will be made available for 

public inspection in the above office 

during regular business hours. The 

United States Standards for Grades of 

Kale are available either through the 

address cited above or by accessing the 

Fresh Products Branch Web site at

http://www.ams.usda.gov/standards/

stanfrfv.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David L. Priester, at the above address 

or call (202) 720–2185; e-mail 

David.Priester@usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

At a 2003 meeting with the Fruit and 

Vegetable Industry Advisory Committee, 

AMS was asked to review all the fresh 

fruit and vegetable grade standards for 

usefulness in serving the industry. AMS 

has identified the United States 

Standards for Grades of Kale for a 

possible revision. These standards were 

last revised in 1934. As a result, AMS 

has identified that industry marketing 

practices indicate the need to modify 

the current standards to allow the 

percentages to be determined by count 

and not weight. However, prior to 

undertaking detailed work to develop 

proposed revisions to the standards, 

AMS is soliciting comments on the 

possible revision to the standards and 

the probable impact on distributors, 

processors, and growers. Additionally, 

AMS is seeking comments regarding any 

other revisions that may be necessary to 

better serve the industry. 

This notice provides for a 60-day 

comment period for interested parties to 

comment on changes to the standards. 

Should AMS conclude that there is a 

need for the revisions of the standards, 

the proposed revisions will be 

published in the Federal Register with 

a request for comments in accordance 

with 7 CFR Part 36.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.

Dated: September 28, 2004. 

A. J. Yates, 

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 

Service.

[FR Doc. 04–22058 Filed 9–30–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Environmental Impact Statement on 

Watershed Planning and 

Implementation of Resource Protection 

Measures for the Marmaton Watershed 

Located in Allen, Bourbon, and 

Crawford Counties, KS

AGENCY: Natural Resources 

Conservation Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI).

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 

1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the U.S. 

Department of Agriculture (USDA), 

Natural Resources Conservation Service 

(NRCS), Kansas State Office, announces 

its intention to prepare an 

environmental impact statement (EIS) to 

evaluate the impacts of resource 

protection measures that would be 

employed under potential alternatives 

within a watershed plan in the 

Marmaton Watershed (located in Allen 

County, Bourbon County and Crawford 

County, all in Kansas). A plan would be 

developed to reduce risks to life and 

property caused by frequent flooding of 

communities and agricultural lands, 

improve water quality, and address 

watershed protection needs. The EIS 

will analyze the potential 

environmental and socioeconomic 

impacts of alternatives in a watershed 

plan, as identified in the watershed 

planning/NEPA process, including any 

structural and non-structural measures 

that would address resource concerns in 

the Marmaton Watershed. 

The purpose of this notice is to 

request participation and invite 

comments from all those individuals 

and organizations interested in the 

development of the EIS. 

Under a watershed plan, the NRCS 

would provide financial and technical 

assistance to sponsoring local 

organizations, including the Allen 

County Conservation District, the 

Bourbon County Conservation District, 

the Crawford County Conservation 

District, and the Marmaton Watershed 

District, for installation of structural 

and/or non-structural measures to 

prevent flooding, improve water quality, 

and protect the watershed throughout 

the described area. The EIS analysis will 

incorporate mitigation measures the 

NRCS would use to minimize, to the 

greatest extent practicable, any potential 

adverse environmental or 

58880 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2004 / Notices 

socioeconomic impacts. Such measures 

are authorized under the Watershed 

Protection and Flood Prevention Act of 

1954, Public Law 83–566 (P.L.–566). 

Public Participation: The NRCS 

invites full public participation to 

promote open communication and 

better decision making. All persons and 

organizations that have an interest in 

the Marmaton River and its tributaries 

with flooding problems and natural 

resource issues within the Marmaton 

Watershed as they affect Allen, 

Crawford, and Bourbon Counties are 

urged to participate in the NEPA 

environmental analysis process. 

Assistance will be provided as 

necessary to anyone having difficulty in 

determining how to participate. A 

public participation plan has been 

developed and will be followed. 

Public comments are welcomed 

throughout the NEPA process. 

Opportunities for public participation 

include: (1) The EIS scoping period 

when comments on the NRCS proposal 

will be solicited through various media 

and at a public meeting to be held in 

Uniontown, Kansas, November 4, 2004; 

(2) the 45-day review and comment 

period for the published Draft EIS; and 

(3) for 30 days after publication of the 

Final EIS. 

Scoping Process: Public participation 

is requested throughout the scoping 

process. The NRCS is soliciting 

comments from the public indicating 

what issues and impacts the public 

believes should be encompassed within 

the scope of the EIS analysis, voicing 

any concerns they might have about the 

identified resource protection measures, 

and submitting any ideas they might 

have for addressing risks to life and 

property in the Marmaton Watershed. 

Other opportunities for public input 

include: (1) once the Notice of 

Availability (NOA) of the Draft EIS is 

published in the Federal Register,

comments will be accepted on the Draft 

EIS for a period of not less than 45 days, 

and (2) once the Final EIS is published 

in the Federal Register, comments will 

be accepted for a period of not less than 

30 days. The NRCS will provide a 

written response to each comment 

provided and will evaluate the issues 

presented for study and possible 

inclusion in the EIS. The public 

participation plan describes 

responsibilities and outreach 

opportunities in this process. 

Date Scoping Comments are Due:

Comments may be submitted by regular 

mail, telephone, facsimile, or e-mail 

until 5 p.m. CST, November 19, 2004. 

Written comments submitted by regular 

mail should be postmarked by 

November 19, 2004, to ensure full 

consideration. (Note: scoping period 

will continue for a period of 45 calendar 

days after issuance date of this NOI.) 

Comments postmarked after this date 

will be considered to the extent 

practicable.

ADDRESSES: Comments on what the 

public wishes to be analyzed or 

addressed within the Draft EIS should 

be mailed to: Dean Krehbiel, Marmaton 

Watershed EIS, 760 South Broadway, 

Salina, Kansas 67401–4604. 

Comments may also be submitted by 

calling (785) 823–4551, by sending a 

facsimile to (785) 823–4540, or by email to dean.krehbiel@ks.usda.gov.

Respondents should provide mailing 

address information and indication of 

wanting to be included on the EIS 

mailing list. All individuals on the 

mailing list will receive a copy of the 

Draft EIS. 

Scoping Meeting: A public scoping 

meeting will be held November 4, 2004, 

to provide information on the watershed 

and planning activities performed to 

date, to give the opportunity to discuss 

the issues and alternatives that should 

be covered in the Draft EIS, and to 

receive oral and written comments. The 

meeting will be held from 1 p.m. to 3 

p.m. at the Uniontown Community 

Center, Uniontown, Kansas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: An 

information package providing 

additional details about the watershed 

and proposed project is available upon 

request. Requests should be directed to 

the same mailing address, telephone 

number, facsimile number, or e-mail 

address noted above under ADDRESSES.

The NRCS and the Marmaton Watershed 

District plan to publish a newsletter to 

keep interested parties up to date on the 

project. Requests to be included on the 

newsletter mailing list should be made 

to the same addresses noted above; 

please include an e-mail address if 

wanting electronic transmission. 

Information may also be obtained from 

the Kansas NRCS Web site at: http://

www.ks.nrcs.usda.gov.

Responsible Official: Harold L. 

Klaege, State Conservationist, NRCS, 

Salina, Kansas, is the responsible 

official for this action. 

Decisions to be Made: The responsible 

NRCS official will decide whether to 

approve an alternative action or no 

action.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: The Marmaton River is a 

permanent stream within the Marais de 

Cygnes river basin in eastern Kansas. 

The Marmaton River flows eastwardly 

from its origins near Moran, Kansas, 

through the community of Fort Scott, 

Kansas, to its confluence with Dry 

Wood Creek near Deerfield, Missouri. 

The Marmaton Watershed encompasses 

210,001 acres, which includes all of the 

Marmaton River drainage above the Mill 

Creek confluence near Fort Scott, 

Kansas. This drainage area lies within 

the Cherokee Prairies and the Scarped 

Osage Plains land resource areas. This 

area consists of slightly dissected plains 

interrupted by a series of low ridges 

formed by east-facing escarpments 

ranging from 770 feet above mean sea 

level to 1,110 feet at its headwaters. 

Between the escarpments are flat to 

rolling plains as a result of the 

differential weathering of shale and 

limestone. 

The major water resource problems in 

the Marmaton Watershed can be 

summarized as serious flooding, water 

quality, and water quantity conditions. 

Total annual rainfall in the watershed 

averages about 40 inches. Two years in 

10 will have less than 31 inches or more 

than 46 inches. Frequent floods are 

common, occurring two and one-half to 

three times per year. Major flood events 

in October 1986 and in October 1998 

each caused damages in excess of $5.5 

million. Included in these damages are 

$2.3 million to agricultural land and 

buildings, rural roads and bridges, and 

scour within the boundaries of the 

Marmaton Watershed District. Outside 

the district boundaries, urban damages 

to Fort Scott, Kansas, were in excess of 

$3.2 million from each flood. Although 

Fort Scott has been re-zoned to reduce 

flood damages since the 1998 flood, 

flooding remains a concern to the 

citizens of that community. Other 

concerns identified in planning include 

deterioration of cropland soil quality, 

deterioration of grazing land condition 

and productivity, degradation of 

riparian woodland and wetland, and 

nutrient and pesticide management 

issues. 

In 1992, sponsoring local 

organizations (Allen County 

Conservation District, Bourbon County 

Conservation District, Crawford County 

Conservation District, and the 

Marmaton Watershed District) requested 

assistance from the NRCS in 

development of a Soil and Water 

Resources Plan for the Marmaton 

Watershed, with major emphasis on 

providing flood protection for 

agriculture, businesses, homes, and 

roads located along the floodplain. A 

preliminary ecosystem-based resource 

plan (preliminary watershed plan) 

developed in 1999, described existing 

floodwater damages, additional resource 

concerns, and two alternatives for 

addressing these concerns. 

In 2004, NRCS representatives met 

with local sponsors and public officials 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2004 / Notices 58881

to discuss planning efforts to detail a 

flood protection analysis, watershed 

protection strategies, and water quality 

improvements. The resource protection 

measures within the Draft EIS will 

include those structures evaluated in 

the 1999 report that provided 

substantial flood protection and also 

met applicable benefit-cost criteria, as 

well as other non-structural alternatives 

that will address local environmental, 

social, and economic needs. 

P.L.–566 authorizes the NRCS to 

provide financial and technical 

assistance to local sponsors to address 

local flooding problems and implement 

watershed protection measures. Under 

the agency proposal for the Marmaton 

Watershed, the NRCS would provide 

financial and technical assistance to the 

sponsors to install measures that will 

address resource concerns within the 

watershed. The sponsors would be 

responsible for operation and 

maintenance of those works of 

improvements. 

Need for the Proposal: The proposal 

is needed to address the problems 

associated with recurrent flooding, 

water quality, water quantity, and other 

natural resources. Recurrent flooding 

due to periodic intense rainstorm events 

within the Marmaton Watershed 

continue to pose a hazard to human 

safety and cause extensive flood damage 

to properties along the river.

Purpose of the Proposal: The purpose 

of the proposal is to assist the local 

community in taking appropriate 

measures to assure public safety and 

protect property in the face of the 

recurrent flooding problems, improve 

water quality concerns, and address 

watershed protection concerns within 

the watershed. 

Preliminary Issues: Among the issues 

that the NRCS plans to consider in the 

scope of the EIS analysis are: 

• Environmental, economic, and 

social impacts of the alternatives. 

• Environmental issues dealing with 

water quality that might be affected. 

• Environmental integrity of the any 

works of improvement. 

• Costs and benefits of the 

alternatives. 

Preliminary Alternatives: The EIS will 

analyze the potential environmental and 

socioeconomic impacts of a range of 

alternatives, including structural and 

non-structural measures, for reducing 

risks to life and property presented by 

Marmaton River flooding and other 

watershed protection concerns. This 

analysis will be summarized in a Draft 

EIS. The preliminary list of alternatives 

for the Draft EIS includes: (1) 

Constructing 48 flood-retarding dams in 

the watershed; (2) using non-structural 

flood protection measures to reduce the 

potential for damage and address 

resource concerns; (3) using land 

treatment measures to control flooding, 

reduce damages, and address resource 

concerns; and (4) taking ‘‘No Action’’—

making no improvements for flood 

protection. The alternatives will be 

refined and supplemented, as 

appropriate, based on input by the 

public and agencies during the public 

scoping process. 

Alternative 1—Evaluate Installation of 

48 Flood-Retarding Structures (FRS) 

Under this alternative, the NRCS 

would evaluate the construction of 48 

earthen dams on tributaries of the 

Marmaton River. The FRS would be 

located throughout the watershed on 

intermittent streams. 

Alternative 2—Employ Non-Structural 

Flood Protection Measures 

Under this alternative, the NRCS 

would evaluate non-structural measures 

that would reduce the potential for 

damage by controlling flooding, 

protection or removal of affected 

structures, and addressing watershed 

protection concerns. 

Alternative 3—Employ Land Treatment 

Measures 

Under this alternative, the NRCS will 

evaluate the effect of land treatment on 

the watershed to determine what 

practices and management will be 

needed to control flooding and address 

watershed protection concerns. 

Alternative 4—‘‘No Action’’ Alternative 

Under this alternative, the NRCS 

would provide no financial or technical 

assistance to sponsoring local 

organizations for flood protection 

measures in the Marmaton Watershed. 

Federal agencies are required to 

evaluate the impacts of a ‘‘No Action’’

alternative in preparing an EIS, even 

though the alternative would not meet 

the agency’s purpose and need. 

Permits or Licenses Required:

Construction of flood retarding 

structures is authorized under P.L.–566 

administered by the NRCS. A permit 

would be required from the U.S. Army 

Corps of Engineers under the Clean 

Water Act (CWA), Section 404 for any 

project that would impede the flow of 

waters of the United States or that 

would affect any wetlands. A permit 

would be required from the State of 

Kansas, Division of Water Resources, for 

any dam structures or structural works 

installed in the flood plain. The State of 

Kansas, Department of Health and 

Environment would require a 

Construction Stormwater Permit and 

subsequent stormwater pollution 

prevention plan. A structural project 

may also require a National Pollution 

and Discharge Elimination System 

(NPDES) water quality certification by 

the State under CWA, Section 401, 

which could be issued in conjunction 

with the CWA 404 permit. Approval 

from the State Historic Preservation 

Office would be required if any National 

Register-eligible historic properties 

would be affected. Consultation with 

the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

would be required if the proposal may 

affect any species listed as threatened or 

endangered under the Endangered 

Species Act. 

Estimated Dates for Draft EIS and 

Final EIS: The NRCS expects to file the 

Draft EIS with the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) and to have it 

available for public review and 

comment during the fall or winter of 

2005–2006. At that time, EPA will 

publish a Notice of Availability (NOA) 

of the Draft EIS in the Federal Register. 

The public comment period on the Draft 

EIS will be a minimum of 45 days from 

the date the EPA publishes the NOA.

The NRCS and the sponsors believe, 

at this early stage, it is important to give 

reviewers notice of several court rulings 

related to public participation in the 

environmental review process. First, 

reviewers of the Draft EIS must structure 

their participation in the environmental 

review of the proposal so that it is 

meaningful and alerts an agency to the 

reviewer’s position and concerns 

(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.

v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)). In 

addition, environmental objections that 

could be raised at the Draft EIS stage, 

but are not raised until after completion 

of the Final EIS, may be waived or 

dismissed by the courts (City of Angoon

v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 

1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. 

Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. 

Wis. 1980)). Because of these court 

rulings, it is very important that those 

interested in this project participate by 

the close of the Draft EIS review period, 

so that substantive comments are made 

available to the NRCS at a time when 

the comments can be meaningfully 

considered in the Final EIS. 

To assist the NRCS and the sponsors 

in identifying and considering issues 

and concerns on the proposed 

alternatives, comments on the Draft EIS 

should be as specific as possible. It is 

also helpful if comments refer to 

specific pages or chapters of the Draft 

EIS. Comments may also address the 

adequacy of the Draft EIS or the merits 

of the alternatives formulated and 

discussed in the Draft EIS. Reviewers 

may wish to refer to the Council on 

58882 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2004 / Notices 

Environmental Quality Regulations for 

implementing the procedural provisions 

of the National Environmental Policy 

Act at 40 CFR 153.3 in addressing these 

points. 

After the comment period on the Draft 

EIS ends, the comments will be 

analyzed, considered, and responded to 

by the NRCS in preparing the Final EIS. 

The Final EIS is scheduled for 

completion by the spring of 2006. The 

responsible officials will consider the 

comments, responses, environmental 

consequences discussed in the Final 

EIS, and applicable laws, regulations, 

and policies in making a decision 

regarding this proposed action. The 

responsible officials will document the 

decisions and reasons for the decisions 

in a Record of Decision. That decision 

will be subject to appeal in accordance 

with 36 CFR part 215.

Dated: September 24, 2004. 

Harold L. Klaege, 

State Conservationist.

[FR Doc. 04–22029 Filed 9–30–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–16–P

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation 

Service 

Cane Creek Watershed, Lauderdale 

County, TN

AGENCY: Natural Resources 

Conservation Service.

ACTION: Notice of availability of record 

of decision. 

SUMMARY: James W. Ford, responsible 

Federal official for projects 

administered under the provisions of 

Public Law 83–566, 16 U.S.C. 1001–

1008, in the State of Tennessee, is 

hereby providing notification that a 

record of decision to proceed with the 

installation of the Cane Creek 

Watershed Remedial project is available. 

Single copies of this record of decision 

may be obtained from James W. Ford at 

the address shown below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James W. Ford, State Conservationist, 

Natural Resources Conservation Service, 

675 U. S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, 

Nashville, Tennessee 37203, telephone 

(615) 277–2531.

(This activity is listed in the Catalog of 

Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 

10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood 

Prevention, and is subject to the provisions 

of Executive Order 12372, which requires 

intergovernmental consultation with State 

and local officials)

Dated: September 23, 2004. 

James W. Ford, 

State Conservationist.

[FR Doc. 04–22030 Filed 9–30–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–16–P

ARCTIC RESEARCH COMMISSION

Notice of Meeting 

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. 

Arctic Research Commission will hold 

its 73rd Meeting in Durham, NH, on 

October 5–8, 2004. The Business 

Session open to the public will convene 

at 9 a.m. Tuesday, October 5; the 

Agenda items include: 

(1) Call to order and approval of the 

Agenda. 

(2) Approval of the Minutes of the 

72nd Meeting. 

(3)Reports from Congressional 

Liaisons. 

(4)Agency Reports. 

The focus of the Meeting will be 

reports and updates on programs and 

research projects affecting the U.S. 

Arctic. Presentations include a review of 

the research needs for civil 

infrastructure in Alaska. 

The Business Session will reconvene 

at 9 a.m. Wednesday, October 6, 2004. 

An Executive Session will follow 

adjournment of the Business Session. 

Any person planning to attend this 

meeting who requires special 

accessibility features and/or auxiliary 

aids, such as sign language interpreters 

must inform the Commission in advance 

of those needs.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Garrett W. Brass, Executive Director, 

Arctic Research Commission, (703) 525–

0111 or TDD (703) 306–0090.

Garrett W. Brass, 

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 04–22037 Filed 9–30–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–M

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM 

PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR 

SEVERELY DISABLED 

Procurement List; Proposed Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase from 

People Who Are Blind or Severely 

Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed addition to 

procurement list. 

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing 

to add to the Procurement List products 

to be furnished by nonprofit agencies 

employing persons who are blind or 

have other severe disabilities. 

Comments Must Be Received On or 

Before: October 31, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase 

From People Who Are Blind or Severely 

Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 

1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 

Arlington, Virginia, 22202–3259.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sheryl D. Kennerly, (703) 603–7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C 

47(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. Its purpose 

is to provide interested persons an 

opportunity to submit comments on the 

proposed actions. If the Committee 

approves the proposed additions, the 

entities of the Federal Government 

identified in the notice for each product 

or service will be required to procure 

the products listed below from 

nonprofit agencies employing persons 

who are blind or have other severe 

disabilities. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 

I certify that the following action will 

not have a significant impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The major factors considered for this 

certification were: 

1. If approved, the action will not 

result in any additional reporting, 

recordkeeping or other compliance 

requirements for small entities other 

than the small organizations that will 

furnish the products to the Government. 

2. If approved, the action will result 

in authorizing small entities to furnish 

the products to the Government. 

3. There are no known regulatory 

alternatives which would accomplish 

the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in 

connection with the products proposed 

for addition to the Procurement List. 

Comments on this certification are 

invited. 

Commenters should identify the 

statement(s) underlying the certification 

on which they are providing additional 

information. 

End of Certification 

The following products are proposed 

for addition to Procurement List for 

production by the nonprofit agencies 

listed:

Products 

Product/NSN: Laser Labels 

7530–01–289–8190—White label size—

1′′ × 4′′

7530–01–289–8191—White label size—

1′′ × 25⁄8′′

7530–01–302–5504—White label size—

11⁄3′′ × 4′′

7530–01–336–0540—White label size—

2′′ × 4′′

7530–01–349–4463—White label size—

81⁄2′′ × 11′′