alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5413. Administrative services and support

#### (a) Provision of support by Secretary

Subject to subsection (b), during the 5-year period beginning on the date on which the Foundation is established, the Secretary—

(1) may provide personnel, facilities, and other administrative support services to the Foundation;

(2) may provide funds for initial operating costs and to reimburse the travel expenses of the members of the Board; and

(3) shall require and accept reimbursements from the Foundation for—

(A) services provided under paragraph (1); and

(B) funds provided under paragraph (2).

#### (b) Reimbursement

Reimbursements accepted under subsection (a)(3)—

(1) shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States to the credit of the applicable appropriations account; and

(2) shall be chargeable for the cost of providing services described in subsection (a)(1) and travel expenses described in subsection (a)(2).

#### (c) Continuation of certain services

The Secretary may continue to provide facilities and necessary support services to the Foundation after the termination of the 5-year period specified in subsection (a) if the facilities and services are—

(1) available; and

(2) provided on reimbursable cost basis.

(Pub. L. 93–638, title VII, §703, as added Pub. L. 111–211, title II, §231(c), July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2277.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 458ccc–2 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
# Ai **rw orthiness**  **Directiv e** 

**Pacific A**

**erospace 750XL Ai**  **rcraft** Issued by the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand in accordance with section 72I(3A) of the Civil Aviation Act . An Airworthiness Directive (AD) contain s regulatory information which is man datory. A n operator of an aircraft must not operate the aircraft unless the operator complies with every applicable AD issued by the Director in accordance with section 72I(3A) of the Civil Aviation Act . A n AD is issued where the Director believes on reaso nable grounds that an unsafe condition exists in an aircraft or aeronautical product . **DCA /750XL/15A**  **Control Column A ttachment**  **– Modification**  **Ap plicability:**  Pacific Aerospace 750XL aircraft, S/N 001 through to 190 and 193. **Requirement:** To prevent in -fligh t detachment of the control column due to possible failure of the attachment

bolt, embody modification PAC/XL/0627 per Pacific Aerospace Limited Service Bulletin (SB) PACSB/XL/070 issue 2, dated 3 June 2014 to both the LH and RH control columns. (Occurrences 12/5755 and 14/162 refer) **Compliance:** At the next 150 hour maintenance inspection (Check 1), or the next 300 hour maintenance

inspection (Check 2), whichever is the sooner. **Effective Date:** DCA/750XL/15 - 30 January 2014

DCA/750XL/15A - 26 June 20 14 **Background:** DCA/750XL/15A revised to mandate the embodiment of modification PAC/XL/0627 to the

control column attachment per the instructions in Pacific Aerospace Limited Service Bulletin (SB) PACSB/XL/070 issue 2, dated 3 June 2014 .

Owen Olls Airwor thiness Specialist Delegate of the Civil Aviation Authortiy of New Zealand 26 June 20 1 4
#### § 3216.21 When is my transfer effective?

Your transfer is effective the first day of the month after we approve it.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 314

 304

 285

 288

 305

 330

 332

 371

 391

 410

 372

 348

 353

 334

 297

 342

 298

 267

 266

 266

 273

 288

 347

 391

 355

 432

 502

 498

 444

 501

 427

 259

 249

 249

 234

 218

 257

 292

 286

 301

 291

 272

 230

 236

 222

 219

 193

 212

 187

 193

 186

 205

 193

 212

 192

 215

 221

 211

 231

 231

 232

 239

 279

 275

 267

 270

 280

 303

 313

 322

 325

 326

 308

 293

 286

 262

 248

 236

 229

 212

 221

 219

 223

 222

 240

 239

 255

 264

 292

 295

 287

 288

 288

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
## REGISTRATION NOT TRANSFERABLE ------------------------------------ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA



# I This certificate DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION- FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION must be in theairCERTIFICATE OF AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION
craft when operated. NATIONALITY AND



# I AIRCRAFT SERIAL NO. REGISTRATION MARKS 

# N 554N5 PH646040986 MANUFACTURER AND MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF AIRCRAFT 

### DJI INNOVATIONS P330D ICAO Aircraft Address Code: 

### 51607604

This certificate is 

### INNOVATIVE AIRWORKS LLC

issued

for I
registration purposes 

# s 157 RAM DR

only and is not a 

# s COVINGTON GA 30014-1958
certificate of title. 

# u

The Federal Aviation E Administration does 

### 0

not determine rights of ownership as T

between private 

### 0

persons. 

### Corporation


# 0

It is certified that the above described aircraft has been entered on the register of the Federal Aviation Administration, United States of America, in accordance with the Convention on International Civil Aviation dated December 7, 

### 1944, and with Title 

### 49, United States Code, 

### U.S. Department 

# 1 and regulations issued thereunder.

• 

### -:bh'T 

# ·~" DATEOFISSUE 

### june22,2015 

# lr/q-[,2/ **-"'-"-'~-** 

# 'fe~~~:at10"n_

•• EXPIRATION DATE june 

## 30, 2018

- ADMINISTRATOR Administration AC **~orm** 8050-3 {1012010) Super_sedes previous editions

**~-** 0 c 

# ~ **~** 

# a **~;.::~.** Civil Aviation Regi?ry P.O. Box 25504 Oklahoma City, OK 73125-0504 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 

# ,_.,:s€5> 

# Pes,;, "' 'io § t{tJ 

# ~'=

.. 

# 17.~""'~= **Z~--~~~~** :;t **v·~** 

### -.;,=•= PIINTY **~L!>** 

## 02 

# w 

# $ 

# 00.48
5 000 423421
3 JUN 24 201 5 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE ?3169 AC Fonn 8050-3 (10/2010) Supersedes previous edition 

### 554NS 

# TO: INNOVATIVE AIRWORKS LLC 157 RAM DR COVINGTON GA 30014-1958 

# 'f
1i II 

# ihii I lij'j.j. \1 **~~!** 

# ii;i\jip
I j I iiiiiillijii

I ii\p\ip

j 

# i• I i\\1
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22443]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
forthcoming meeting of the 2004 Science and Technology Quality Review 
Panel. The purpose of the meeting is to allow the Air Force Scientific 
Advisory Board to assess the quality and long-term relevance of Air 
Force Research Laboratory Special Program research. Because classified 
and contractor-proprietary information will be discussed, this meeting 
will be closed to the public.

DATES: 15-18 November 2004.

ADDRESSES: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Major Kyle Gresham, Air Force 
Scientific Advisory Board Secretariat, 1180 Air Force Pentagon, Rm. 
5D982, Washington, DC 20330-1180, (703) 697-4808.

Pamela D. Fitzgerald,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-22443 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 006 Attachment Name CAS RN 151688-56-1 Summary of Molecular Weright Distribution and Percent Monomer Composition Associated PMN Section Number N/A Contains CBI Report Number Sanitized Version

# All CBI has been removed
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 411

 386

 418

 404

 420

 421

 424

 425

 432

 424

 432

 434

 423

 431

 435

 463

 450

 440

 432

 428

 439

 426

 430

 419

 416

 419

 418

 427

 428

 412

 409

 351

 337

 353

 361

 370

 405

 404

 403

 407

 384

 419

 415

 416

 413

 409

 403

 400

 394

 399

 400

 400

 402

 399

 378

 387

 389

 382

 384

 381

 378

 375

 388

 368

 391

 384

 404

 408

 410

 410

 414

 409

 424

 426

 420

 420

 418

 416

 410

 407

 406

 407

 408

 409

 407

 401

 401

 399

 397

 398

 394

 386

 385

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 3861.5-2 Employment.

A mineral claimant may employ any United States mineral surveyor qualified as indicated in paragraph (a) of this section to make the survey of his claim. All expenses of the survey of mining claims and the publication of the required notices of application for patent are to be borne by the mining claimants.
### §1748. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 97–399, §9, Dec. 31, 1982, 96 Stat. 2016, which related to limitation of actions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 4.1122 Conduct of administrative law judges.

Administrative law judges shall adhere to the “Code of Judicial Conduct.”
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Joshua
      A. Gottesman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
      Public Company Management Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of Public Company Management
      Corporation.





Date:
      December 28, 2006





By:  /s/
      Joshua A.
      Gottesman


Joshua
      A.
      Gottesman


Chief
      Financial Officer
(No. 744

Claimant awarded $45.21.)

#### Maryland Assurance Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 15, 1924.*

Insurance *tax*— when *award for overpayment may he made.*There being no objection interposed by the State, the court may enter an award for a refund of an overpayment of the tax.

Maryland Assurance Corporation, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for an overpayment made by the claimant to the Division of Insurance, Department of Trade and Commerce, for which a refund of $45.21 is claimed.

The defendant by the Attorney General, comes and states that the claim has been approved by the Director of the Department of Trade and Commerce, and consents to the allowance of the claim.

It is therefore recommended by the court that said claimant be allowed the sum of $45.21.
#### § 3283.12 Are transferees and successors in interest of Federal geothermal leases bound by the terms and conditions of the unit agreement?

The terms and conditions of the unit agreement are binding on transferees and successors in interest to Federal geothermal leases committed to a unit agreement.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-CV-21843-COOKE/GOODMAN

GINETTE LUXAMA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a 

municipality governed under the 

laws of the State of Florida,

Defendant.

______________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff, Ginette Luxama, through her counsel, respectfully gives notice that a

settlement agreement was reached at mediation. The mediator and parties are in the process 

of preparing case-finalizing documents which will be filed upon completion.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 8, 2021, I filed this document using the 

CM/ECF system, which caused this document to be served on all counsel of record identified 

on the Service List below.

By: /s/ Marc A. Burton

Marc A. Burton, F.B.N. 95318

Richard J. Burton, F.B.N. 179337

The Burton Firm, P.A.

2875 NE 191st Street, Suite 403

Aventura, Florida 33180

Phone: 305-705-0888

Fax: 305-705-0888

pleadings@theburtonfirm.com

Case 1:20-cv-21843-MGC Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/08/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

SERVICE LIST

THE BURTON FIRM, P.A.

Counsel for Plaintiff Ginette Luxama

2875 N.E. 191 Street, Suite 403

Aventura, Florida 33180

P: 305-705-0888 | F: 305-705-0008

pleadings@theburtonfirm.com

rb@theburtonfirm.com

mburton@theburtonfirm.com

CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

CITY OF MIAMI BEACH

Counsel for Defendant City of Miami Beach

1700 Convention Center Drive

Fourth Floor – Legal Department

Miami Beach, Florida 33139

P: (305) 673-7470 | F: (305) 673-7002

robertrosenwald@miamibeachfl.gov

Case 1:20-cv-21843-MGC Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/08/2021 Page 2 of 2
#### § 4.701 Notice of appeal.

The appellant shall file a written notice of appeal, signed by him or by his attorney or other qualified representative, in the Office of the Director, within 30 days from the date of mailing of the decision from which the appeal is taken. The notice shall contain an identification of the action or decision appealed from and give a concise but complete statement of the facts relied upon and the relief sought. The appellant shall mail a or electronically transmit under the terms of OHA Standing Orders copy of the notice of appeal, any accompanying statement of reasons therefor, and any written arguments or briefs, to each party to the proceedings or whose rights are involved in the case, and to the Departmental official whose action or decision is being appealed. The notice of appeal shall contain a certificate setting forth the names of the parties served, their addresses, and the dates of mailing.

[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 88 FR 5794, Jan. 30, 2023]
FY 2011 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET

BY SECTION

 PRESIDENT'S

 BUDGET

CVPIA

Section Description W&R1RF

Anadromous Fish (Structural)

(b)(4) Tracy Pumping Plant 2.051 0.000

Tracy Fish Test Facility 0.000

(b)(5) Contra Costa Canal Pump 0.105

(b)(10) Red Bluff Diversion Dam 39.937

(b)(11) Coleman Fish Hatchery 0.000

(b)(15) Old River Barrier 0.000

(b)(20) GCID - Hamilton City Pump Plant 0.058

(b)(21) Anadromous Fish Screen Program 3.712

 TOTAL 42.151 3.712

Anadromous Fish (Habitat Modification)

3406(b)(1) Anadromous Fish Restoration 6.070

(b)(1)B In-Stream Flow Requirements 0.000

(b)(2) Dedicated Project Yield 0.800

(b)(3) Water Acquisition

Permanent Purchases

Instream-other 5.700

VAMP Doublestep 0.000

(b)(12) Clear Creek Restoration 0.251 0.800

(b)(13) Spawning Gravel 0.700

(b)(23) Trinity Restoration 11.823 1.000

 TOTAL 12.074 15.070

Refuges and Waterfowl

(d)(1)(2)(5) Refuge Water Conveyance

 Facility Construction 0.000 1.900

 Refuge Wheeling 0.000 9.500

 San Joaquin Basin Action Plan 0.350 0.200

Level 4 Water Purchases 8.000

 TOTAL 0.350 19.600

Other F&W

(b)(1) (other) Other CVP Impacts

 Habitat Restoration 1.700

 San Joaquin River Riparian Program 0.000

3408(h) Land Retirement 0.050 0.500

 TOTAL 0.050 2.200

Studies, Investigations & Models

(b)(9) Flow Fluctuation Study 0.050

(c)(1) San Joaquin River Basin Resource Mgmt 1.500

(g) Ecol\Wtr Systm Ops Model 0.000 0.800

 VAMP 5.700

 TOTAL 0.000 8.050

Monitoring

(b)(16) Comp Assess Monitoring Program 1.283

 TOTAL 0.000 1.283

54.625 49.915

 -----------FY11-----------

1 ARRA Funding not shown here

cvpia/^ 2/22/2011
#### § 3813.0-3 Authority.

The Act of July 20, 1956 (70 Stat. 592), which amended the Act of July 17, 1914 (38 Stat. 509; 30 U.S.C. sec. 122), was enacted to permit the disposal of certain reserved mineral deposits under the mining laws of the United States.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe CFL condition for spectral approximations to hyperbolic initial-boundary value problemsThe stability of spectral approximations to scalar hyperbolic initial-boundary value problems with variable coefficients are studied. Time is discretized by explicit multi-level or Runge-Kutta methods of order less than or equal to 3 (forward Euler time differencing is included), and spatial discretizations are studied by spectral and pseudospectral approximations associated with the general family of Jacobi polynomials. It is proved that these fully explicit spectral approximations are stable provided their time-step, delta t, is restricted by the CFL-like condition, delta t less than Const. N(exp-2), where N equals the spatial number of degrees of freedom. We give two independent proofs of this result, depending on two different choices of approximate L(exp 2)-weighted norms. In both approaches, the proofs hinge on a certain inverse inequality interesting for its own sake. The result confirms the commonly held belief that the above CFL stability restriction, which is extensively used in practical implementations, guarantees the stability (and hence the convergence) of fully-explicit spectral approximations in the nonperiodic case.Document ID19900015517Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsGottlieb, David*(Brown Univ. Providence, RI., United States)*Tadmor, Eitan*(Tel-Aviv Univ.)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberICASE-90-42AD-A225291NAS 1.26:182053NASA-CR-182053Accession Number90N24833Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF DMS-88-10150CONTRACT_GRANT: AF-AFOSR-0093-90CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18605CONTRACT_GRANT: N00014-86-K-0754Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015517.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 21-5211 September Term, 2021

1:21-cv-01750-APM

Filed On: February 24, 2022

Christopher Thieme,

Appellant

v.

Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as

Attorney General of the United States, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Wilkins, Rao, and Jackson, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 3, 2021,

dismissing appellant’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction, be affirmed. The district court

correctly concluded that the declaratory relief appellant sought was essentially in the

nature of habeas, and must therefore be pursued in the district court that imposed the

underlying sentence. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(a); see also Williams v. Hill, 74 F.3d 1339,

1340 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (noting that it is “well-settled that a prisoner seeking

relief from his . . . sentence may not bring an action” for injunctive and declaratory relief

as a means to challenge his sentence); LoBue v. Christopher, 82 F.3d 1081, 1083

(D.C. Cir. 1996) (rejecting efforts to “manipulate the preclusive effect of habeas

jurisdiction”). With respect to appellant’s additional claim for prospective injunctive or

mandamus relief applicable to future criminal prosecutions, appellant has not

demonstrated that he has standing to seek such prospective relief on his own behalf. 

See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992) (party seeking to

establish standing must show a “concrete and particularized” injury that is “likely [to be]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 21-5211 September Term, 2021

redressed by a favorable decision”). Nor has he shown that he was authorized to seek

such relief on behalf of other parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654; Georgiades v. MartinTrigona, 729 F.2d 831, 834 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (pro se party may not plead on behalf of

other parties); LoBue, 82 F.3d at 1085 (holding that plaintiffs “cannot overcome their

jurisdictional infirmities . . . by reference to the characteristics of putative class members

– a class uncertified at the time the jurisdictional issue should have been resolved”).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
## Express August 21,2015 Hearing Docket Federal AviationAdministration 600 Independence Avenue S.W. Wilbur WrightBuilding- Suite 2Wl000 Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 l.ega' Department 3620 Hacks Cross Road B,;ilding B. 3rd F-loor Memphis,TN 38125 US

### ~.lJG 

## 242015 HEARING DOCKET

RE: Request for Formal Hearing- FAA CaseNumber: 201SNM720020 Dear Sir: In response to the Final Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty that was issued in FAA case number 2015NM720020 and received by my office on August 11, 2015, Federal Express, in accordance with 14 CPR 13.16(g)(2)(ii), respectfully requests a hearing inthis matter. A copy ofthis request is being sent to David F. Shayne, Federal Aviation Administration, Office ofthe ChiefCounsel, Enforcement Division, Western Team, 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA98057. All correspondence regarding this matter should be sent to my attention at 1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 950, Washington, DC 20006. Ifthere are any questions, please call me at (202) 393-9285 or email greg.stofko@fedex.com. Sincerely,
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION

Greg G. Stofko Senior Attorney Regulatory Affairs Office: (202) 393-9285 greg.stofko@fedex.com

cc: David F. Shayne
#### In the Matter of Ocean Beach Ferry Corporation, Appellant, against Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review the determination of the hoard of trustees of the Village of Ocean Beach, awarding a contract or franchise for exclusive ferry operations from and to the ferry terminal owned by the village, order dismissing the petition on the merits unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to each group of respondents filing a brief. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
#### § 3452.1-1 General.

The lessee may surrender the entire lease, a legal subdivision thereof, an aliquot part thereof (not less than 10 acres) or any bed of the coal deposit therein. A partial relinquishment shall describe clearly the surrendered parcel or coal deposits and give the exact acreage relinquished. If the authorized officer accepts the relinquishment of any coal deposits in a lease, the coal reserves shall be adjusted in accordance with part 3480 of this title.

[47 FR 33147, July 30, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 8627, Mar. 4, 1985]