UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.  20549  Form 10-KSB Amendment 1  xANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006   ̈TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  Commission file number 000-49679  LITFUNDING CORP. (Name of small business issuer in its charter)  Nevada93-1221399(State or other jurisdiction of(I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)Identification No.)  6375 S. Pecos RoadLas Vegas, Nevada89120(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)  Issuer's Telephone Number (702) 898-8388  Copies of Communications to: Dennis H. Johnston, a Professional Law Corporation 9422 Canfield La Habra, CA  90631 Tel: (310) 666-2133 Fax: (818) 827-0900  Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:  None  Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:  Common Stock, $0.001 par value (Title if Class)  Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.   ̈  Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x   No  ̈    Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.   ̈  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ̈  No x  The issuer’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. $644,040  The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the average bid and ask price, as of March 31, 2007, was $6149434, based on a share value of $0.078.  Check whether the issuer has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.  Yes x   No  ̈  The number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding on March 31, 2007, was 78,838,902 shares.  Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):  Yes  ̈  No x   LitFunding Corp. (the “Company”) is filing this Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) to its Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 that was originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on April 17, 2007 (the "Original 10-KSB"). The Company has included the Report Letter of its Independent Registered Public Accountants which was inadvertently excluded from its Original 10-KSB. For the convenience of the reader, this Amendment No. 1 amends in its entirety the Original 10-KSB. This Amendment No. 1 continues to speak as of the date of the Original 10-KSB. We have updated the disclosure contained herein to reflect the inclusion of the Report as noted above, and to supplement or correct certain portions of the Original 10-KSB. All information contained in this Amendment is subject to updating and supplementing as provided in our periodic reports filed with the SEC subsequent to the date of the filing of the Original 10-KSB.


LITFUNDING CORP. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006  Index to Report on Form 10-KSB  PART IPageItem 1.Description of Business2Item 2.Description of Property10Item 3.Legal Proceedings10Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders11PART IIItem 5.Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters11Item 6.Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations17Item 7.Financial Statements27Item 8.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure27Item 8A.Controls and Procedures28Item 8B.Other Information28PART IIIItem 9.Directors and Executive Officers, Promoters, and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.29Item 10.Executive Compensation33Item 11.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management35Item 12.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions37Item 13.Exhibits38Item 14Principal Accountant Fees and Services39


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS   This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objections of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.  Forward-looking statements may include the words may, could, estimate, intend, continue, believe, expect or anticipate or other similar words.  These forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report.  Except for our ongoing securities laws, we do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any forward-looking statement.  Although we believe that the expectations reflected in any of our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any or our forward-looking statements.  Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties.  The factors impacting these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:  o increased competitive pressures from existing competitors and new entrants; o increases in interest rates or our cost of borrowing or a default under any material debt agreements; o deterioration in general or regional economic conditions; o adverse state or federal legislation or regulation that increases the costs of compliance, or adverse findings by a regulator with respect to existing operations; o loss of customers or sales weakness; o inability to achieve future sales levels or other operating results; o the unavailability of funds for capital expenditures and/or general working capital; and o operational inefficiencies in distribution or other systems.  For a detailed description of these and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement, please see Factors That May Affect Our Plan of Operation in this document.  Throughout this Annual Report references to we, our, us, LitFunding, the Company, and similar terms refer to LitFunding Corp.   1    PART I  ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS  (a) General Business Development  LitFunding Corp. was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 11, 1996 as RP Entertainment, Inc., but changed its name to LitFunding Corp. in February 2003 as the result of a reverse merger.  On February 21, 2003, we completed a reverse triangular merger among our wholly-owned subsidiary RP Acquisition Corp. (RP Acquisition), a Nevada corporation, and California LitFunding, formerly LitFunding Corp., (California LitFunding), a California corporation.  Pursuant to the terms of the merger, California LitFunding merged with RP Acquisition wherein RP Acquisition ceased to exist and California LitFunding became our wholly-owned subsidiary.  On April 2, 2003, certain individuals and entities filed an involuntary bankruptcy petition under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code against the Company in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District California.  After numerous legal proceedings, in November 2003, we filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition.  In January 2004, California LitFunding filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition.  On June 17, 2004, we received confirmation of our joint plans of reorganization from the United States Bankruptcy Court on June 17, 2004.  On March 22, 2006, we filed our motion seeking final decree.  See Item 3 Legal Proceedings for further description.  Business is conducted through our subsidiary, LitFunding USA and its wholly owned limited liability companies.  LitFunding USA was incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 22, 2004.  LitFunding USA resumed the business of California LitFunding (our subsidiary who has been in business since 2000) subsequent to June 17, 2004, after the United States Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming us and California LitFundings joint plans of reorganization.  For the years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we incurred net losses before extraordinary gain, of $1,027,947 and $3,972,043, respectively.  Our accumulated deficit at the end of December 31, 2006 was $11,225,266.  As a result of our losses, our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, indicated that there was substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  (b) OUR BUSINESS  We are in the business of investing in litigation recoveries.  We provide funding to qualifying plaintiffs and plaintiffs attorneys for the payment of costs and expenses of litigation, principally in the areas of personal injury, medical malpractice, product liability, toxic torts and employment. These costs generally include costs such as court filing fees, expert witnesses, private investigators (i.e. if the litigant is injured or otherwise incapacitated and unable to work) and other expenses of a law office in filing and maintaining a civil lawsuit.  We do not provide funding for criminal or administrative proceedings.  We generate revenues by raising capital and advancing this capital to various law firms pursuant to various settlement agreements.  These settlement agreements provide that the funds advanced shall be repaid to us, along with a fee,  2    when the lawsuits referenced in the agreement ultimately settle.  The exact amount of the fee payable on the funds advanced depends upon the length of time the funds are outstanding, up to a fixed limit.  Pursuant to the terms of these settlement agreements, our contractual right to payment is limited to the funds ultimately paid to the law firm from the specified lawsuit, or lawsuits, in which the funds are invested or expended.  We believe that litigants may need our services for many reasons including:  · Many litigants simply do not have the financial means required to present and maintain their cases effectively through all the necessary stages of litigation; · The defendant or entity is often a corporation, represented by an insurance company with experienced counsel and greater financial and other resources to defend against a claim; · Plaintiffs attorneys frequently do not have the financial means, or simply do not want to advance the money, necessary to pay the costs and expenses of litigating certain types of civil actions. · Personal injury cases seek monetary recovery for medical costs, loss of life or use of limbs, and emotional damages, all of which necessitate "expert" testimony to establish and enhance the amount of the recovery; such expert testimony is often prohibitively expensive to many plaintiffs or their counsel; · Depending on the circumstances of the particular case, expert witnesses may be involved in a typical case in terms of complexities of the issues to be proven; and even more if the case involves multiple parties, more complex issues and/or larger damage claims.  For example, in a construction defect case, expert witnesses are engaged to provide opinion testimony on a range of issues from the nature of the alleged defect, whether the damage was caused by defective materials, design or construction (or a combination thereof), the effect it has on the value of the construction project as a whole and the losses sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the delays, costs and other factors related to the problems created by the construction defect.  Our management believes that the market for litigation assistance funding is substantial, especially in larger states such as California where cases regularly overload crowded county court dockets.   However, we often turn down cases not only because they are not meritorious, but also because we lack the resources to fund all of them.  In managements judgment, additional funding will allow us to grow at a more desirable rate.  Underwriting Services  We find cases to invest in through law firms and attorneys.  We currently have contracts with clients in California (with an emphasis in Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura and San Diego counties), Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota, Mississippi, New York and South Carolina. We have in the past and are available to write contracts for attorneys in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and the Virgin Islands.  3    We have an internal director of sales and marketing to develop advertising and sales programs to our target market. We also obtain case referrals from independent brokers who refer a potential funding to us for evaluation. We retain sole discretion in the selection criteria and procedure.  Brokers are paid between 5% and 6% of the funds that we place.  Our internal guidelines limit non-recourse investment in any given case can be no more than 7% of what our retained legal experts estimate to be the value of the case to us.  We enter into contracts with the attorney or law firm representing the litigant and, upon request of the attorney, directly with the litigant.  In exchange for our financial support, we receive a contingent contractual interest secured by a security interest in the monetary settlement or judgment in the lawsuit.  If a case is lost or abandoned, we receive nothing in exchange for our investment.  We are not a law firm and take no role in the filing or handling of the litigation.  However, if the case is settled or a judgment is obtained against the defendant, we are paid according to the formula in the contract.  Generally, we receive a return of our investment, plus a 45% return on the funds we provide for every 90 days the principal is outstanding.  This return is capped at 270% of the amount advanced.  Excluding cases that are lost and do not pay any return, our statistics show that we receive a return of our investments and fees on cases we invest within an average of 12 to 36 months from the date of our investment.  We intend to shorten this cycle by advancing on cases that are much closer to resolution.  When our management judges the business climate to be appropriate, we anticipate that we may apply for the necessary permits and licenses that will allow us to become a full-recourse lender.  Loans made under this program will be fully collateralized by the attorney firms portfolio of cases and real and personal property of the firms partners.  These loans will be unlike our current non-recourse programs which are advances and not loans, proposed interest rates may range between 30% and 38% per annum and the loan is fully repayable whether the underlying case is lost or won.  Interest payments may be made either monthly or quarterly.  For the year ended December 31, 2006, we have $414 thousand in funds on approximately 60 cases. We have collected $890,000 in principle and fees, lost $30,000 of principle, and have open and unresolved cases totaling approximately $810,000. We estimate that the principle and fees expected on the open and unresolved cases is approximately $1.2 million.  Case Selection and Administration  We believe that selection of cases is the essential ingredient of our business.  We contract only with attorneys and law firms that, in our assessment, have the experience and acumen to represent their clients zealously and competently.  Ninety to ninety-five percent of the cases in which we have invested to date are being handled by attorneys with whom we have previously contracted business, or who are referrals from existing attorney clients.  In 2006 we invested in the following types of cases with the number of cases funded following the category:  Personal injury7  4     Product liability24Medical malpractice12Discrimination1Wrongful death6Civil rights4Auto collision3Premises liability1Sexual abuse1Burn injury2   SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS  Agreements with Imperial Capital Holdings  On January 16, 2006, we entered into an Equity Investment Agreement (Investment Agreement), which is an equity line of credit ("ELoC"), with Imperial Capital Holdings ("Imperial"). On that same date, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (Registration Agreement) with Imperial, which called for us to file a registration statement relating to the ELoC within sixty days.  Further, we were in default of our promise to register the common stock underlying the shares of our Series A convertible preferred stock, which Imperial acquired in August, 2005, and, in July, 2006, we were also in default on the payment of a $30,000 promissory note due Imperial on July 12, 2006. On July 28, 2006, we reached an understanding with Imperial to cure our defaults in exchange for the issuance of 800,000 shares of common stock, which is being registered hereunder.  Concurrently, we entered into a new Investment Agreement and a new Registration Rights Agreement with Imperial with substantially similar terms as the original agreements dated January 16, 2006.  The ELoC terminates 24 months after the registration statement has been declared effective. The maximum amount of money that the ELoC may provide to us over the 24-month period of time is $3,000,000.  During these 24 months, commencing at such time as the registration statement becomes effective, we may periodically deliver newly issued, registered shares of our common stock to Imperial who will then deliver to us the purchase price, in cash, in amounts based on a fluctuating price per share of our common stock. We are not obligated to request any portion of, or the entire $3,000,000. The actual aggregate number of shares that we may issue pursuant to the Investment Agreement is not determinable as it is based on the market price of our common stock from time to time and how much funding we desire from time to time. We have reserved 9 million shares for issuance under the ELoC, which we are registered in this registration statement pursuant to the terms of our agreements with Imperial.  We can commence drawing down on the ELoC at such time as this registration statement becomes effective. Since only the Commission can order a registration statement effective, we do not know when or if the registration statement will become effective. For an equal amount of dollars of funding from time to time pursuant to the ELoC, the number of shares we would issue to Imperial would be greater during times of our stock price being low, as it currently is, and  5    conversely so during times when our stock price is high. Pursuant to the ELoC, we are subject to penalties if we fail to deliver stock to Imperial after we request a draw down from the ELoC.  Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement, and pursuant to the ELoC, we may issue and sell to Imperial, and Imperial will purchase from us, up to that number of shares of common stock having an aggregate value not exceeding $3,000,000.  However, Imperial is not obligated to purchase such amount of shares that would cause it to own more than 9.9% of our total number of outstanding shares at any given time.  From time to time, we may, in our sole discretion, deliver a put notice to Imperial which states the dollar amount which we intend to sell to Imperial which will be, at our choice, either: (A) 200% of the average daily volume (as quoted on the U.S. markets only) of our common stock for the 10 trading days prior to the applicable put notice date, multiplied by the average of the 3 lowest daily closing bid prices immediately preceding the put date, or, (B) a minimum put amount of $10,000.  The maximum amount of any put notice cannot exceed $250,000. The purchase price for the common stock identified in the put notice will be equal to 93% of the lowest closing bid price of the common stock during the pricing period. The pricing period is the period beginning on a put notice date and ending on and including the date that is five (5) trading days after the put notice date. Imperial is required to purchase from us during the related pricing period that number of shares having an aggregate purchase price equal to the Put Amount set forth in the Put Notice. Imperial is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection with the resale of our common stock under the Investment Agreement.  As we draw down on the ELoC, more shares will be sold into the market by Imperial. This new supply of shares may cause our stock price to drop. In turn, as the stock price drops and as we make more draw downs on the ELoC, even more stock will come into the market which may cause yet a further drop in stock price. You should be aware that there is an inverse relationship between our stock price and the number of shares to be issued pursuant to the ELoC. If our stock price declines, we will be required to issue a greater number of shares under the ELoC. We are not required to draw down or use the full amount available of the ELoC.   Merger With Global Universal Film Group  Effective March 7, 2006, we completed a reverse tri-party merger by an among the Company, Silver Dollar Production, a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and Global Universal Film Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation, whereby we issued 1,500,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock to Global in exchange for 100% of the issued and outstanding securities of Global.  Pursuant to the terms of the merger, Global merged into Silver Dollar wherein Silver Dollar ceased to exist and Global became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.  Our merger agreement with Global Universal gives their former shareholders, as holders of our Series B convertible preferred stock, the right to spin-off from LitFunding and become a separately traded corporation. After electing to spin-off, their preferred stock will automatically convert into an equal amount of shares of our common stock at the closing of the spin-off transaction.  On October 16, 2006, Global Universal shareholders gave notice to the Company of  6    their election to spin-off from us. Upon completing the spin-off transaction, we will earn a management fee of $200,000, of which $26,000 has already been paid by Global Universal, and we will retain 10% of Global Universals shares that are issued and outstanding immediately after the spin-off transaction.  The Company plans to file a registration statement to effect the spin-off transaction and register the shares of Global Universal that will be distributed to all LitFunding shareholders on a pro-rata basis.  On August 29, 2006, we announced that Global Universal, our wholly owned subsidiary, had commenced filming the pilot of Youve Got the Part!, which is a new reality show using the latest advancement in cell phone and Internet technologies to find Hollywoods new generation of aspiring actors. Global Universal is presently seeking a network affiliate or other entertainment company that will fund the further development of and the televised airing of the show.   Acquisition of Easy Money Express  On March 31, 2006, we entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with Easy Money Express, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, whereby we issued 20,000 shares of our common stock to the 2 stockholders of Easy Money in exchange for 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Easy Money held by the 2 stockholders. Pursuant to the terms of the share exchange agreement, Easy Money will continue as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.   Letter of Intent between Easy Money and Interactive Brand Development, Inc.  On April 7, 2006, our wholly-owned subsidiary Easy Money entered into a letter of intent with Interactive Brand Development, Inc. (IBD), a Delaware corporation, wherein they wish to engage in a joint venture project for an Internet based payday loan operation under the trade name Easy Money Express.  We are working with IBD to perform the necessary due diligence that will allow both parties to sign a definitive agreement, which will provide the specific details regarding the terms and conditions of the joint venture.  Upon completion of a definitive agreement we will file a Form 8-K.  On June 16, 2006, our wholly owned subsidiary, Easy Money Express, entered into a service agreement with M3 Internet Services, Inc. d/b/a CashZip, a South Dakota Corporation, wherein M3 agreed to promote and market the Easy Money Internet-based loan business through its developed online marketing using various online search engines and Pay-per-Click marketing services, including, but not limited to www.Google.com, as well as mutually agreed upon promotional and advertising material. Compensation shall be paid only on loan transactions made and repaid. Easy Money shall pay to M3 50% of the gross revenue generated from loan transactions based upon referrals made by M3 and loan transactions based upon referrals made by any source outside of M3s marketing efforts. Easy Money shall also pay M3 a $12 client acquisition fee for each new client who submits an online loan application. The term of the agreement is for twelve (12) months commencing on June 16, 2006 and will automatically renew  7    for succeeding 12-month periods unless either party notifies the other, in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the term that it does not intend to renew.   Agreement with CardMart Plus USA  On November 17, 2006, we entered into a binding Letter of Intent with CardMart Plus USA, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, whereby we would agree to issue approximately 44 million shares of our unregistered common stock to the stockholders of CardMart Plus USA in exchange for 100% of their issued and outstanding shares of capital stock.  This transaction, if completed, would constitute a change in control of the Company.  The Letter of Intent also provides that CardMart Plus USA will agree to invest the sum of $300,000 into our subsidiary, Easy Money Express, in addition to merging in their core business operations. The Letter of Intent provided us with a $25,000 non-refundable deposit and called for final agreements to be completed on or before December 1, 2006.  On February 20, 2007, we mutually agreed to terminate the Letter of Intent with CardMart Plus USA due to business problems experienced by CardMart Plus USA that could not be resolved in a definitive period of time.  We filed a Form 8-K on February 23, 2007, regarding our termination of the Letter Agreement with CardMart Plus USA.   Intellectual Property  We use the trade names of LitFunding, California LitFunding, LitFunding USA and CA Funding.  Other that an expertise in assessing underwriting risks, our proprietary database and experience of success with various lawyers and law firms, our business is not dependent upon proprietary information.  Our Industry  Our goal is to provide funding for plaintiffs and the law firms representing increasing their chances of bringing a case to a favorable outcome.  In return for a percentage of the settlement or eventual judgment, we arrange for such plaintiffs attorneys to fund the conduct of such litigation.  Unlike attorneys who bill hourly for their legal services, plaintiffs attorneys in personal injury litigation and in similar types of cases work on a contingency basis and routinely fund the cost of litigation themselves. For example, expert witnesses are essential to the successful litigation of a personal injury case, and can cost several thousand dollars per expert per case. Accordingly, a plaintiff attorney's ability to maximize the value of a case is based in part on their ability to fund the case. In addition, plaintiff attorneys are often obligated to provide funds to their clients for living and other expenses while awaiting settlement.  In order to satisfy their clients' needs, they may be forced to settle a client's claim at a lesser amount, advance their own funds to clients without the lawful ability to charge interest, or risk losing clients to other attorneys who will advance funds.   Competition   8    We compete with numerous companies located throughout the United States that provide litigation funding. Other than an expertise in assessing underwriting risks, our proprietary database and experience of success with various lawyers and law firms, we do not maintain any proprietary competitive advantage. Accordingly, we believe that there are no substantial barriers to competitors entering the market. While we acknowledge that we may not be able to compete successfully against future competitors with greater financial resources or access to potential business. Additionally, it is possible that competition may drive down the return on our advances to plaintiffs, which may negatively impact the viability of our business model.  We have identified a significant number of entities nationwide operating within our current and potential marketplace.  These companies, include, but certainly are not limited to: · Resolution Settlement Corporation, located in Las Vegas, Nevada   (website www.resolutionsettlement.com). · The Attorney Store.com (www.attorneystore.com) has a list of at least 10 companies in the United States providing litigation funding. · Plaintiff Support Services, located in Getzville, New York, has a website at www.plaintiffsupport.com and takes requests for litigation funding.  The application is contained on their website, which we believe is typical of many litigation funding company websites. · Advocate Capital, Inc. is located in Dallas, Texas, Nashville, Tennessee and Cleveland, Ohio (according to their website www.advocatecapital.com). · Interim Settlement Funding Corp, based in Hudson, Ohio, describes itself as a funding company-making contingent advances to individuals with pending personal injury cases.  See www.interimsettlement.com. · HSAC Funding, in Reno, Nevada, has a website at www.hsacfunding.com. · Case Funding Network says on its website that it provides individuals and businesses non-recourse, advances for litigants (www.casefunding.com). · National Lawsuit Funding, located in Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, says it provides advances for commercial lawsuits.  See www.nationallawsuitfunding.com. · Lawsuit Funding, LLC, has a website at www.lawsuitfinancial.com.  In addition, Law Finances, Inc., located in San Francisco, California, to the best of our knowledge, is a California company that has provided funds to litigants.  To our knowledge, only one of our competitors, Case Financial Inc., of Encino, California, is publicly reporting on the Edgar system with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Given the lack of discoverable information about our competitors, we do not know how our method of operations and results compare to others in the industry.  However, given the nature of the business opportunity presented within our industry, and managements belief that the market, though unquantifiable, is very large, there is always the possibility that new competitors with greater resources will commence operations and compete directly with us in such a manner as to harm our operational results and future prospects and reduce our ability to generate revenues. Marketing Strategy   9    We have a full time dedicated sales staff that is responsible for developing and maintaining relationships with our personal injury attorneys and law firm clients.    The sales team directly markets our products to attorneys representing plaintiffs in the types of cases that fit our underwriting criteria.  At this time, we have several relationships with plaintiff attorneys which serve as a referral base for new and increasing repeat business.  Growth Strategy  Since relocating to Nevada, our objective is to become the pre-eminent institutional source of non-recourse pre-settlement litigation funds across the country. To achieve this objective, the key elements of our strategy are as follows:  · Build awareness of our services in the nationwide personal injury litigation market. · Develop new products and services. · Improve risk and portfolio management tools and guidelines. · Improve our information technology infrastructure. · Find new non-recourse lending opportunities within the litigation market in segments other than personal injury litigation. · Find new short term recourse lending opportunities within national litigation market. · Find new opportunities for our lending business in personal injury and other litigation markets outside of California.  In order to be successful we must continue to build awareness in the nationwide legal marketplace about our products and services, as well as increase both the number of clients we service and the amounts we fund or guaranty.  The development of new products and services is a critical element of the plan to grow our business. Our focus is to deliver new products which better meet our customers' needs for reduced pricing. At the same time, our product development efforts are directed towards reducing the overall investment risk in our business, and thereby increasing our portfolio returns on investment and profit margins.  Government Regulation  We intend to conduct our business in compliance with any applicable regulations, and are subject to general state and federal laws governing the conduct of businesses in general.  In regard to our specific line of business, we are unaware of any state or federal regulations concerning non-recourse advances in any of the states in which we currently do business, or intend to do business in the foreseeable future.  In the event that our activities are deemed to be loans, or in the event that we decide to extend loans as defined by state law, we intend to comply with any and all applicable finance and lending regulations.  Each state has laws and regulations governing the business of lending money that differ from state to state. Therefore, prior to offering or expanding our lending services into a new jurisdiction we must conduct an extensive review of that state's regulatory framework to ensure compliance with the applicable regulations.   10    Research and Development  We are not currently conducting any research or development activities. We do not anticipate conducting such activities in the near future.   Personnel  We currently employ 3 full time employees.  Because of the legal proceedings previously discussed in prior filings, we have undertaken measures to reduce staff and overhead to minimum levels.  In the event that we generate significant revenues and expand our operations, then we may need to hire additional employees or independent contractors.  Consultants  Andrew Baum.  On December 1, 2005, we entered into a consulting agreement with Andrew Baum, wherein Mr. Baum agreed to provide us with services related to market analysis, financial planning, contacts with the realization of value for the Companys stock and strategic transactions and relationships.  The term of the agreement was for three months expiring on March 1, 2006.  We agreed to compensate Mr. Baum a fixed, one-time fee in the amount of $18,000.  In lieu of said cash fee, Mr. Baum agreed to accept 300,000 shares of our common stock.  The 300,000 shares were issued on March 2, 2006.  The shares were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed with the SEC on February 28, 2006.  Gary A. Rasmussen.  On December 13, 2005, we entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Rasmussen, wherein Mr. Rasmussen agreed to provide us with advice and general consultation in the areas of management, marketing and financing, and for such other consulting services as we may mutually agree upon.  We agreed to compensate Mr. Rasmussen a fixed, monthly retainer fee in the amount of $4,000, of which the first payment shall be due and owing upon the execution of the agreement, and subsequent payments shall be due on each monthly anniversary date thereafter.  Additionally, we agreed to pay Mr. Rasmussen a fee equal to 1% of the gross dollar amount of any equity line of credit commitment received from Mr. Rasmssens sources.  The term of the agreement is for 36 months from the date of execution and will continue on a month-to-month basis until either party elects to terminate the agreement.  Mr. Rasmussen was introduced to us by Queststar, which has a fee agreement in force with us dated September 21, 2004.  Mr. Rasmussen and Queststar have agreed to share equally in any fees received by Queststar from us.  IR Partners, LLC.  On January 10, 2006, we entered into an agreement with IR Partners, LLC, wherein IR Partners agreed to provide us with investor relations services during the period February 1, 2006 through May 31, 2006.  As consideration for the performance of the services we agreed to pay IR Partners $5,000 and issue 250,000 shares of our restricted common stock (issued on February 1, 2006).  CLX & Associates, Inc.  On March 1, 2006, we entered into a consulting agreement with CLX & Associates, Inc., wherein CLX agreed to provide us with consulting services in  11    connection with (i) short and long term strategic planning; (ii) short term crisis management; (iii) short and long term marketing; (iv) meeting with/selecting qualified companies for joint business ventures; (v) contracting and interviewing qualified accounting firms and legal counsel; (vi) recruitment selection of key executives and staff; (vii) internet and website design; and (viii) recommending and identifying of board members.  We agreed to compensate CLX for the services a total of $100,000 in cash, or 1,000,000 shares of our common stock.  CLX will commence providing services for the Company on such date as it has received the agreed compensation (effective date).  The term of the agreement is for three months from the effective date.  On June 23, 2006, the 1,000,000 shares were issued to CLX.  Navin Enterprises, Inc.  On March 1, 2006, we entered into a consulting agreement with Navin Enterprises, Inc., wherein we agreed to retain the services of Navin to advise and consult with us regarding the Companys establishment of a branch office in Canada to advance nonrecourse funds to Canadian attorneys in Canada.  The term of the agreement is for 6 months from March 1, 2006.  We agreed to issue 150,000 shares of our freely traded common stock to Navin as full and complete compensation.  The said shares shall be issued 25,000 shares per month over the term of the agreement.  On March 6, 2006, we issued 25,000 shares of our common stock to Navin.  The shares were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed with the SEC on February 28, 2006.  On April 20, 2006, we issued 25,000 shares of our restricted common stock to Navin.  Julian Goldberg.  On August 2, 2006, our wholly-owned subsidiary Global Universal Film Group entered into a consulting agreement with Julian Goldberg, wherein Mr. Goldberg agreed to assist Global in connection with Globals efforts to raise capital through the sale and offering of Globals interest bearing, ten-year corporate notes in the principal amount of $50,000,000, with principal secured or guaranteed by a package of Insurance Instruments (the Corporate Notes).  The term of the agreement is for three (3) months from the date of August 2, 2006.  Global agreed to compensate Mr. Goldberg with an initial retainer in the amount of $4,000.  In the event that Global is successful in realizing financing from the sale of Globals Corporate Notes, then Mr. Goldberg shall be entitled to receive an incentive fee in an amount equal to 6.5% of the cash proceeds actually received by Global.  In the event Global is successful in obtaining financing from the sale of the Corporate Notes from any source located or introduced to Global by Mr. Goldberg, Global shall pay Mr. Goldberg a one-time performance fee in an amount equal to 3% of the gross proceeds from the Corporate Notes.  Mr. Goldberg will also be entitled to a stock performance fee in the event of the sale of the Corporate Notes and paid in the form of a common stock warrant entitling Mr. Goldberg to purchase up to 500,000 shares of Globals common stock.  The warrant shall effective for one year from the date of August 2, 2006 and the stock price shall be equal to 50% of the average closing prices for the initial 20 trading days after trading, immediately after the spin off from the Company.     ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY   12    We currently maintain an executive office at 6375 S. Pecos Road, Suite 217, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120.  The space consists of approximately 1800 square feet.  The monthly rental for the space is $1,300 per month.  ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  We are a defendant in several matters in litigation, many of which are in the normal course of business, including litigation for refunds of funds invested. We believe these suits are without merit and intends to defend these litigations in courts of law.  We are involved in suits for breach of contract, fraud, conspiracy and defamation with the same claimants in the United States Bankruptcy Court and California State Court. The claimants allege that there was a finder's fee agreement between them and the founding officers / shareholders of the Company. The Company's position is that there was a negotiated agreement with the claimants, which was complied with. The claimants allege damages of $16 million.  In May 2004, the United States Bankruptcy Court upheld the Company's objections to all monetary claims. The claimants appealed this decision. Additionally, they filed an adversary proceeding raising most of the issues already raised in the first claims. In February 2005, the United States Bankruptcy Court partially dismissed the claimant's adversary complaint and told the claimants to amend the complaint to give them the opportunity to clarify their claims. The claimants filed that amended complaint. In March 2005, we filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice the entire amended complaint on the grounds that the claims therein were previously denied by the court in the bankruptcy proceeding.  The State Court action has been stayed pending resolution of the issues in the United States Bankruptcy Court. The Federal Court's decisions in the Company's favor will preclude proceedings against the Company in the state court action.  ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS  No matters were submitted to the vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.  PART II  ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS  (a) Market Information  Our common stock is quoted under the symbol LFDG.OB on the OTC Bulletin Board which is sponsored by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD).  The OTC Bulletin Board is a network of security dealers who buy and sell stock.  The dealers are connected by a computer network which provides information on current bids and asks as well as volume information.  The OTC Bulletin Board is not considered a national exchange.  13    Our common shares commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board on July 11, 2002.  The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low bid prices for our common stock during our last two fiscal years as reported by the National Quotations Bureau.  The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.  200620052004HighLowHighLowHighLow1st Quarter0.380.121.500.350.7502nd Quarter0.2750.060.820.350.5103rd Quarter0.140.041.230.310.750.164th Quarter0.070.030.600.0950.800.20   (b) Holders of Common Stock  As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately 216 stockholders of record of the 30,738,902 shares outstanding.  (c) Dividends  The Board of Directors have not declared any dividends due to the following reasons:  1. The Company has not yet adopted a policy regarding payment of dividends; 2. The Company does not have any money to pay dividends at this time; 3. The declaration of a cash dividend would result in an impairment of future working capital; and 4. The Board of Directors will not approve the issuance of a stock dividend.  (d) Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans  2002 Employee Stock Compensation Plan  Effective August 15, 2002, we adopted a 2002 Employee Stock Compensation Plan, as amended, with a maximum number of 1,500,000 shares that may be issued.  As of December 31, 2005, 537,500 options and 960,000 warrants have been issued under this plan, which leaves 2,500 shares available for issuance.  No Plan shares may be issued after July 14, 2008.  2004 Stock Option Plan  Effective March 9, 2004, we adopted a 2004 Stock Option Plan.  The total number of shares of our common stock which may be purchased pursuant to the exercise of options shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 30% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Companys common stock.  As of December 31, 2005, 2,320,000 options have been granted under this plan.  2006 Non-Qualified Stock Compensation Plan   14    Effective February 21, 2006, we adopted a 2006 Non-Qualified Stock Compensation Plan. The maximum number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the plan is 6,000,000 shares.  As of May 16, 2006, 4,000,000 shares gave been issued under this plan.  Officers (including officers who are members of the board of directors), directors (other than members of the stock option committee to be established to administer the stock option plans) and other employees and consultants and its subsidiaries (if established) will be eligible to receive options under the stock option plans.  The committee will administer the stock option plans and will determine those persons to whom options will be granted, the number of options to be granted, the provisions applicable to each grant and the time periods during which the options may be exercised.  No options may be granted more than ten years after the date of the adoption of the stock option plans.  Non-qualified stock options will be granted by the committee with an option price equal to the fair market value of the shares of common stock to which the non-qualified stock option relates on the date of grant.  The committee may, in its discretion, determine to price the non-qualified option at a different price.  In no event may the option price with respect to an incentive stock option granted under the stock option plans be less than the fair market value of such common stock to which the incentive stock option relates on the date the incentive stock option is granted.  Each option granted under the stock option plans will be exercisable for a term of not more than ten years after the date of grant.  Certain other restrictions will apply in connection with the plans when some awards may be exercised.  In the event of a change of control (as defined in the stock option plans), the date on which all options outstanding under the stock option plans may first be exercised will be accelerated.  Generally, all options terminate 90 days after a change of control.  The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2005 regarding outstanding options granted under the plans, warrants issued to consultants and options reserved for future grant under the plan.  Plan CategoryNumber
of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)Number of shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding shares reflected in column (a))
(c)Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders-$--Equity compensation plans not approved  by stockholders4,727,500$0.2842,500 (1)Total4,727,500$0.2842,500 (1)  15      (1) 2,500 shares available for issuance under our 2002 Employee Stock Compensation Plan.  Under the 2004 Stock Option Plan we are allowed to issue a total number of shares of our common stock which may be purchased pursuant to the exercise of options and shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 30% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Companys common stock.  These plans are intended to encourage directors, officers, employees and consultants to acquire ownership of common stock.  The opportunity so provided is intended to foster in participants a strong incentive to put forth maximum effort for its continued success and growth, to aid in retaining individuals who put forth such effort, and to assist in attracting the best available individuals to the Company in the future.  As of December 31, 2005, 2,500 shares remained available for issuance under the 2002 employee stock compensation plan. As of May 16, 2006, 2,000,000 shares remained available under the 2006 non-qualified stock compensation plan.   Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities  We sold and issued the following securities during the past fiscal year that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended:  Issuances to Officers and Directors On March 21, 2006, we issued 9,000 shares of our commons stock to Stanley Weiner, a Director of the Company, for services rendered to the Company.  The shares issued were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed on February 28, 2006.  On April 18, 2006, we issued 831,481 shares of our common stock to Morton Reed, CEO of the Company, in exchange for accrued compensation valued at $130,000.  The shares issued were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed on February 28, 2006.  Other than the shares issued above pursuant to a registration on Form S-8, we believe that the issuance and sale of the above mentioned restricted shares were exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) and Regulation D promulgated thereunder.  The shares issued were directly from us and did not involve a public offering or general solicitation.  The recipients of the shares were afforded an opportunity for effective access to files and records of the Company that contained the relevant information needed to make their investment decision, including the financial statements and 1934 Exchange Act reports.  We reasonably believed that the recipients, immediately prior to issuing the shares, had such knowledge and experience in our financial and business matters that they were capable of evaluating the merits and risks of their investment.  The recipients had the opportunity to speak with our management on several occasions prior to their investment decision.  Issuances to Consultants and Employees  On February 1, 2006, we issued 250,000 shares of our restricted common stock to IR Partners, LLC pursuant to its agreement dated January 10, 2006.  On April 18, 2006, we issued 50,000 shares of our common stock to Anthony Longo as a sign-on bonus pursuant to the sales consultant agreement with Alliance Marketing. On April 20, 2006, we issued 25,000 shares of our restricted common stock to Baldev Singh Grewal of Navin Enterprises, Inc. pursuant to its consulting agreement dated March 1, 2006.  16     On June 23, 2006, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock to CLX & Associates, Inc. pursuant to its consulting agreement dated March 1, 2006.  On August 7, 2006, the 1,000,000 shares were cancelled due to failure to perform.  On August 24, 2006, the parties entered into a new agreement and the 1,000,000 shares were reissued on August 28, 2006.  We believe that the issuance and sale of the above mentioned restricted shares were exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The shares issued were directly from us and did not involve a public offering or general solicitation.  The recipients of the shares were afforded an opportunity for effective access to files and records of the Company that contained the relevant information needed to make their investment decision, including the financial statements and 1934 Exchange Act reports.  We reasonably believed that the recipients, immediately prior to issuing the shares, had such knowledge and experience in our financial and business matters that they were capable of evaluating the merits and risks of their investment.  The recipients had the opportunity to speak with our management on several occasions prior to their investment decision.  There were no commissions paid on the issuance and sale of the shares.  Other Issuances and Sales  On March 8, 2006, Andrew Green exercised 400,000 warrants at a price of $0.01 per share.  The 400,000 shares of our restricted common stock were issued on March 13, 2006. On March 15, 2006, we sold 250,000 shares to two accredited investors for a total purchase price of $50,000, all of which was paid in cash.  The 250,000 shares were issued on March 21, 2006.  On April 18, 2006, we issued 15,000 shares of our common stock to Rochester Capital Partners, LP (of which Gary Rasmussen serves as its General Partner) and 5,000 shares of our common stock to Joseph Weaver in exchange for 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Easy Money Express, Inc. (200,000 shares).  Apex Investment Fund Ltd. converted 400,000 shares of Series A 12% Convertible Preferred Stock into 800,000 shares of our restricted common stock.  The 800,000 shares of common stock were issued on June 2, 2006.  The 800,000 shares of common stock are being registered in this SB-2 Registration Statement.  On August 28, 2006, we issued Imperial Capital Holdings a total of 800,000 shares of our restricted common stock.  Of the 800,000 shares, 96,000 were issued as a dividend on the 400,000 shares of Series A 12% Convertible Preferred stock held by Imperial, 504,000 were issued as an inducement fee for the equity line of $3,000,000 and the 200,000 were issued to extend the $30,000 promissory note held by Imperial.  In addition, we have promised to issue and register hereunder an additional 500,000 shares at the time our registration statement becomes effective.  The total of 1,300,000 shares of common stock are being registered in this SB-2 Registration Statement.  Davric Corporation purchased 678,049 shares of our common stock at $0.41 per shares in December of 2004.  The stock was never issued until August 28, 2006 and due to the drop in our stock price we issued an additional 2,101,951 shares of our common stock.  The 2,780,000 shares of common stock were valued at $0.10 per share and the 2,780,000 shares are being registered in this SB-2 Registration Statement.  In August, 2006, we agreed to issue 500,000 shares of our restricted common stock to Rochester Capital Partners, LP., as consideration under a consulting agreement in connection with the Imperial  17    Investment Agreement.  Rochester Capital Partners, LP., is controlled by Gary Rasmussen as its General Partner.  We believe that the issuance and sale of the restricted shares was exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) and Regulation D promulgated thereunder.  The shares issued were directly from us and did not involve a public offering or general solicitation.  The recipients of the shares were afforded an opportunity for effective access to files and records of the Company that contained the relevant information needed to make their investment decision, including the financial statements and 34 Act reports.  We reasonably believed that the recipients, immediately prior to issuing the shares, had such knowledge and experience in our financial and business matters that they were capable of evaluating the merits and risks of their investment.  The recipients had the opportunity to speak with our management on several occasions prior to their investment decision.  Issuances of Stock Options and Warrants  On January 5, 2006, we granted 300,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock at $0.15 per share to Baldev Singh Grewal for services rendered to the Company.  The options are exercisable for one year.  On March 15, 2006, we issued a two (2) year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock at $0.25 per share to David Ciolino for services rendered to the Company.  We believe that the issuance and grant of the warrants and options was exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) and Regulation D Rule 506.  The shares issued were directly from us and did not involve a public offering or general solicitation.  The recipients of the shares were afforded an opportunity for effective access to files and records of the Company that contained the relevant information needed to make their investment decision, including the financial statements and 34 Act reports.  We reasonably believed that the recipients, immediately prior to issuing the shares, had such knowledge and experience in our financial and business matters that they were capable of evaluating the merits and risks of their investment.  The recipients had the opportunity to speak with our management on several occasions prior to their investment decision.  Subsequent Issuances  On February 22, 2007, our board of directors voted to accept an agreement with Rochester Capital Partners, LP., a Nevada limited partnership (RCP), where by the Company  would issue 40 million of our restricted common stock in exchange for consideration of $250,000, an a best efforts commitment to fund an additional $180,000.  Additionally, RCP agreed to acquire an additional 11 million shares of common stock directly from Morton Reed, our CEO, in exchange for consideration of $65,000.  Mr. Gary Rasmussen is the General Partner of RCP and has served as a consultant to our Company for the past 2 years.  On March 5, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with RCP and, on March 7, 2007, we issued 40 million shares to Rochester Capital Partners, pursuant to the above mentioned agreement.  Of the 40 million shares, 21 million shares was assigned by RCP and issued directly to Lehars Handels Ges., M.b.H., an Austrian corporation located in Graz, Austria  18    (Lehars), pursuant to a separate agreement between RCP and Lehars. The balance of 19 million shares were issued directly to RCP.  The foregoing description of the transaction between the Company and RCP is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Companys current report on Form 8-K filed on March 7, 2007.  We believe that the issuance of the above shares was exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2).   ITEM 6. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  This report contains forward-looking statements.  Actual results and events could differ materially from those projected, anticipated, or implicit, in the forward-looking statements as a result of the risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this report.  With the exception of historical matters, the matters discussed herein are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning anticipated trends in revenues and net income, the date of introduction or completion of our products, projections concerning operations and available cash flow. Our actual results could differ materially from the results discussed in such forward-looking statements. The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.  OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK  We are in the business of investing in litigation recoveries. Business is conducted through our subsidiary, LitFunding USA and its wholly owned limited liability companies.  LitFunding USA resumed the business of California LitFunding (our subsidiary who has been in the business since 2000) subsequent to June 17, 2004, after the United States Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming us and California LitFunding joint plans of reorganization.  We raise and advance capital to various law firms pursuant to Settlement Agreements.  These Settlement Agreements provide that the funds advanced shall be repaid to us, plus a fee, when the lawsuits referenced in the agreement ultimately settle.  The amount of the fee payable on the funds advanced depends upon the length of the time the funds are outstanding, up to a fixed limit.  Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreements, the Companys contractual right to payment is limited to the funds ultimately paid to the law firm from the specified lawsuit, or lawsuits, in which the funds are invested or expended.  In June, 2006, we announced the receipt of an order of final decree closing our bankruptcy proceedings on the grounds that the bankruptcy case has been fully administered.  During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, we had placed approximately $414 thousand in funding to law firms, which as of December 31, 2006 we have collected $890,000 in  19    principal and fees, lost $30,000 of principle, and have open and unresolved cases totaling approximately $810,000.  We estimate that the principle and fee expected on the open and unresolved cases is approximately $1.2 Million.  Results of Operations  The following overview provides a summary of key information concerning our financial results for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.  Revenues  Year Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)20062005$%Net Revenue$     644,040$   355,262$(1,523,421)(81%)  Revenue: Total revenue was $355,264 and $1,878,685 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Our decrease in revenue of $1,523,421 is due to the startup nature of the business after the reorganization. Our operating cycle is typically longer than one year for funded cases to generate revenue. We cannot guarantee with certainty when we will generate revenue sufficient to fund ongoing operations. Our future revenues will be reliant on the ability to fund future cases which require shorter periods of funding and strong collection efforts on funded cases as they are resolved. Operating expenses  Year Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)20062005$%Reserve for unsuccessful resolution of lawsuits76,950$35,20084%General and administrative expenses1,598,4502,986,487560,23923%Consulting fees  related party8301-8,301-Financing expense45,90667,28867,288-Depreciation and amortization23,55828,4672,3599%Preferred stock dividend19,9931,2451,245-Total operating expenses1,749,302$2,494,106$674,63227%    Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased by $674,632 over the year ended December 31, 2005 because of the startup costs associated with the Companys relocation to Las Vegas, Nevada and the expenditures required to reestablish a marketing and capital acquisition program.  Other income (expense)   20     Year Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)20062005$%Other income$10,000$73,953$32,51578%Interest (expense)(62,685)(57,039)32,187130%Rental income-01,500-Amortization of debt
discount130,000(678,484)677,484-Total other income
(expense)77,315$(660,570)642,4843,552%  Our interest expense was $32,187 higher in 2006 than 2005 because we used short term financing to cover operating costs.  Net (loss)  Year Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)20062005$%Net (loss) before
extraordinary gain$ (1,027,947)$  (3,972,043)$3,046,688329%  Our net loss before extraordinary gain was approximately 329% higher in the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 because we had sales in 2005 and there were non-cash professional fees incurred in 2005.  Until we can increase sales we will continue to have net losses.  Operation Plan  During the next twelve months we plan to effectuate our business plan and have restarted the marketing of our products and increased our product offerings. Demand for financing continues to remain strong and we have a backlog of requests for advances that we look forward to begin satisfying as soon as we have secured new capital or financing.  Additionally, we still intend to start marketing of a new full recourse loan product during 2006. We believe that full recourse loans, which we anticipate will eventually become approximately 10% of our core business, will limit our exposure to losses, allow for earlier recognition of revenue and at the same time answer the demand in the legal community for more traditional borrowing facilities that carry a lower interest rate compared to the fees we currently charge for our non recourse advance product. We intend to expand our geographic market penetration and will explore opportunities to acquire assets or other companies in this industry.  We have cash of approximately $1,618 as of December 31, 2006. In the opinion of management, available funds will not satisfy our working capital requirements for the next twelve months. Nevertheless, our reorganization plan does provide for sufficient revenue to sustain operations.   21    We will also need to raise funds to continue to implement our business plan. We plan to raise these funds through private and institution or other equity offerings including interest bearing debentures. We may attempt to secure other loans from lending institutions or other sources. We will also consider establishing relationships with selected business partners whose contributions include necessary cash. There is no guarantee that we will be able to raise additional funds through offerings or other sources. If we are unable to raise funds, our ability to continue with operations will be materially hindered.  Liquidity and Capital Resources  Liquidity is a measure of a companys ability to meet potential cash requirements.  We have historically met our capital requirements through the issuance of stock and by borrowings.  In the future we believe we will be able to provide the necessary liquidity we need by the revenues generated from our operations.  Promissory Notes  On November 9, 2005, we entered into a Promissory Note with Imperial Capital Holdings, LLC. for the principal amount of $10,000.  Pursuant to the note we promised to pay to the order of Imperial Capital Holdings the sum of $10,000 together with accrued interest thereon at 12% per annum on any unpaid balance and a one-time processing fee of $500, all due and payable on the maturity date of December 9, 2005.  The note plus processing fee was paid on February 16, 2006.  On December 21, 2005, we entered into a Promissory Note with Global Universal Film Group Ent., Inc. for the principal amount of $50,000.  Pursuant to the note Global promised to pay us the sum of $50,000 together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum on any unpaid balance.  The $50,000 is to pay for the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the merger and was due upon completion of the merger.  The note is due on June 30, 2006.  On December 31, 2005, we entered into a Promissory Note with Herbert Stein for the principal amount of $25,000.  Pursuant to the note we promised to pay to the order of Herbert Stein $25,000 together with accrued interest thereon at 10% in sixty (60) days.  The note was verbally extended and on May 5, 2006, we paid the principal amount plus interest to Herbert Stein.  On February 1, 2006, we entered into a Promissory Note with Davric Corp. for the principal amount of $25,000.  Pursuant to the note we promised to pay to the order of Davric Corp. the sum of $25,000 together with accrued interest thereon at 12% in sixty (60) days.  The note was verbally extended and on May 9, 2006, we paid the principal amount plus interest to Davric Corp.  Pursuant to our outstanding indebtedness to the law firm of Callahan & Blaine for legal services in connection with our Bankruptcy proceedings, our subsidiary California LitFunding and Michael A. Marcelli entered into a Promissory Note with Daniel J. Callahan for the principal amount of $36,881 on March 1, 2006.  Pursuant to the note California LitFunding and Michael  22    A. Marcelli, jointly promised to pay to the order of Daniel J. Callahan the sum of $36,881 with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per annum.  Monthly installments commenced on April 1, 2006, in the amount of $7,524 and will continue thereafter on the first day of each month until August 1, 2006, at which time all unpaid principal and accrued interest shall be due and payable.  Each monthly payment shall be credited first on the interest then due, and the remainder, if any, on the principal sum; interest shall thereupon cease to accrue on the amount so credited on the principal sum.  Should default be made in the payment of any installment due under the note, Mr. Callahan will be entitled to payment of all amounts due plus $8,305 previously waived in consideration for the note and the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately due and payable at the option of Mr. Callahan.  On May 10, 2006, Easy Money, our wholly owned subsidiary, entered into a Promissory Note with Davric Corp. for the principal amount of $100,000.  Pursuant to the note Easy Money promised to pay to the order of Davric Corp. the sum of $100,000 together with accrued interest thereon at 24% per annum.  The principal amount of the note or any part thereof, along with all interest accrued and unpaid thereon, shall be payable to Davric Corp. on or before one year from the date of May 10, 2006.  Investment Agreement with Imperial Capital Holdings  On January 16, 2006, we entered into an Investment Agreement with Imperial Capital Holdings (Imperial).  Under the terms of the agreement, we agreed to issue and sell to Imperial, and Imperial agreed to purchase from us up to that number of shares of common stock having an aggregate purchase price of $3,000,000.  We will be able to require Imperial to purchase up to the $3,000,000 of its common stock over a two-year period commencing on the date a registration statement is declared effective by the SEC covering shares of our common stock underlying the Investment Agreement. These funds will be able to be drawn at our discretion by delivering a written notice (Put Notice) stating the amount of funds we wish to draw (Put Amount).  The Put Amount shall be equal to 93% of the market price of our common stock, as calculated in accordance with the terms of the Investment Agreement, provided that in no event will the Put Amount be greater than $250,000.  We shall not be entitled to submit a Put Notice until after the previous closing has been completed.  If any closing best bid price during the applicable Pricing Period (the period beginning on the Put Notice date and ending on and including the date that is 5 trading days after such Put Notice date) with respect to any particular Put Notice is less than 75% of any closing best bid price of the common stock for the 10 trading days prior to the Put Notice date, the Put Notice will terminate at our request. On July 28, 2006, we reached a new understanding with Imperial to cure our default in the previous agreement caused by delays in filing a registration statement in exchange for the issuance of 800,000 shares of common stock, which is being registered on Form SB-2.  Concurrently, we entered into a new Investment Agreement and a new Registration Rights Agreement with Imperial with substantially similar terms as the original agreements dated January 16, 2006.  Registration Rights.  Pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement with Imperial, we are obligated to file a registration statement registering 8,000,000 shares of our common stock issuable on the date proceeding the filing of the Registration Statement based on the closing bid price of our common stock on such date and the amount reasonably calculated  23    that represents common stock issuable to other parties as set forth in the Investment Agreement except to the extent that the SEC requires the share amount to be reduced as a condition of effectiveness.  We shall use commercially reasonable efforts to have the Registration Statement declared effective by the SEC within 180 calendar days after the filing of the Registration Statement.  Placement Agent.  In connection with the Investment Agreement, we entered into a Placement Agent Agreement with Brewer Financial Services, LLC., a NASD registered broker-dealer.  The Placement Agent will render consulting services to us with respect to the Investment Agreement and will be available for consultation in connection with the advances to be requested by us pursuant to the Investment Agreement.  We agreed to pay to the Placement Agent 1% of the gross proceeds from each draw for all services in connection with the Placement Agent Agreement.  Satisfaction of our cash obligations for the next 12 months.  As of December 31, 2006, our cash balance was $1,618.  Over the next twelve months we believe that existing capital and anticipated funds from operations will not be sufficient to sustain operations and planned expansion.  Our plan for satisfying our cash requirements for the next twelve months is through additional equity, third party financing, and/or traditional bank financing.  We intend to make appropriate plans to insure sources of additional capital in the future to fund growth and expansion through additional equity or debt financing or credit facilities. No assurance can be made that such financing would be available, and if available it may take either the form of debt or equity.  In either case, the financing could have a negative impact on our financial condition and our Stockholders.  We anticipate incurring operating losses over the next twelve months. Our lack of operating history makes predictions of future operating results difficult to ascertain. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stage of development, particularly companies in new and rapidly evolving technology markets. Such risks include, but are not limited to, an evolving and unpredictable business model and the management of growth. To address these risks we must, among other things, implement and successfully execute our business and marketing strategy, continue to develop and upgrade technology and products, respond to competitive developments, and continue to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in addressing such risks, and the failure to do so can have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.  Going Concern  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern remains dependent upon successful operation under the bankruptcy plan, obtaining additional capital and financing, and generating positive cash flow from operations. The Company intends to seek additional capital either through debt or equity offerings and believes that increased volume and reduction in its lead time to finance and collect on funded cases will ultimately lead to profitability and positive cash flows. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability  24    and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  Summary of product and research and development that we will perform for the term of our plan.  We do not anticipate performing any significant product research and development under our plan of operation until such time as we complete a merger or acquisition.  Expected Purchase or sale of plant and significant equipment.  We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any plant or significant equipment, as such items are not required by us at this time or anticipated to be needed in the next twelve months.  Significant changes in the number of employees.  We currently employ 3 full time employees.  Because of the legal proceedings previously discussed in prior filings, we experienced a deleterious and damaging loss of key personnel that will have to be replaced.  In the event that we generate significant revenues and expand our operations, then we may need to hire additional employees or independent contractors.  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements  We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results or operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.  Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates  Our Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section discusses our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, accrued expenses, financing operations, and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of our financial statements include estimates as to the appropriate carrying value of certain assets and liabilities which are not readily apparent from other sources, primarily allowance for doubtful accounts receivables, accruals for other costs, and the classification of net operating loss  25    and tax credit carry forwards between current and long-term assets. These accounting policies are described at relevant sections in this discussion and analysis and in the notes to the financial statements included in this report.  FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT OUR RESULTS OF OPERATION  Our cash flow depends on a lengthy collection cycle and factors beyond our control that may require us to obtain interim financing.  Our procedures and underwriting process have been changed to try and lessen our risk and to shorten our collection cycle.  Nevertheless, our collection cycle on advances made will remain lengthy compared to other similar industries.  We believe that cases we advance funds to attorneys on may take between 18 months and 36 months to reach resolution.  Larger cases may take longer to reach resolution.  Once we advance the money, the collection cycle is out of our control and this may force us to seek other sources of capital to fund our overhead expenses.  There can be no assurance that in such an event we could find such financing or that, if we could, the financing would be available on satisfactory terms.  We have a limited operating history and lack of profitability.  We still have limited operating history having begun business in 2000 and spent almost a full year in litigation defending ourselves from a petition for involuntary bankruptcy.  During that time, we have incurred losses in every quarter since inception except for the extraordinary gain realized in December 2004 and we remain subject to the risks and uncertainties usually encountered by early stage companies.  In the past, we attracted large well known firms of attorneys as clients.  We believe that it will be possible to once again attract large firms of this caliber even after the enormously negative and unwarranted reputation achieved during the bankruptcy litigation.  We have met with some successes in this regard.  We have not yet experienced an intolerable inability to attract the talent that we need.  However risks remain that we will not attract, train or integrate into the business organization qualified personnel.  Additionally, it is fair to expect that fluctuations in operating results may be significant as we develop and test new business practices.  There is also the risk that we will fail to properly manage growth and expansion, if and when it occurs.  Our business of funding plaintiffs and plaintiff attorneys may be in potential conflict with champerty laws.  Champerty, as defined by Blacks Law Dictionary, is a bargain to divide the proceeds of litigation between the owner of the liquidated claim and a party supporting or enforcing the litigation.  Different states impose rules on the champerty process.  We research state champerty laws prior to advancing capital to plaintiffs and plaintiff attorneys, however, if we were to be found in violation of states champerty laws it could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.   26    We have historically had losses from operations and losses may continue in the future, which may cause us to curtail operations.  Since our inception we have not been profitable and have lost money on both a cash and non-cash basis.  For the year ended December 31, 2006, we incurred net losses of $1,027,947. Our accumulated deficit at the end of December 31, 2006 was $11,225,266. Future losses are likely to occur, as we are dependent on spending money to pay for our operations. No assurances can be given that we will be successful in reaching or maintaining profitable operations.  Accordingly, we may experience liquidity and cash flow problems.  If our losses continue, our ability to operate may be severely impacted or alternatively we may be forced to terminate our operations.  We are subject to a working capital deficit, which means that our current assets on December 31, 2006 were not sufficient to satisfy our current liabilities and, therefore, our ability to continue operations is at risk.  We had a working capital deficit for the year ended December 31, 2006 which means that our current liabilities exceeded our current assets on December 31, 2006 by $2,916,232.  Current assets are assets that are expected to be converted to cash within one year and, therefore, may be used to pay current liabilities as they become due. Our working capital deficit means that our current assets on December 31, 2006, were not sufficient to satisfy all of our current liabilities on December 31, 2006.  If our ongoing operations do not begin to provide sufficient profitability to offset the working capital deficit, we may have to raise capital or debt to fund the deficit or curtail future operations.  Our common stock is listed on the Over-the-Counter (OTC) Bulletin Board which may make it more difficult for stockholders to sell their shares and may cause the market price of our common stock to decrease.  Our common stock is listed on the OTC Bulletin Board.  Factors that may affect potential liquidity include limited coverage by security analysts and the news media.  This may negatively affect the prices for our shares of common stock.  The filings of the involuntary bankruptcy petition against us on April 2, 2003 and subsequent litigation and filings of voluntary chapter 11s for both ourselves and our then operating subsidiary, California LitFunding did have a materially negative effect on the price of our stock and for all intents and purposes that stock had no value for all of 2003 and most of 2004.  We believe that the successful resolution of the litigation has given us an opportunity to rebuild value in the stock.  Our stock price may be volatile and an investment in such common stock could suffer a decline in value.  The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly and violently in response to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control.  These factors include:  · Government regulatory action affecting our services or competitors services; · Actual or anticipated fluctuations in operating results;  27    · The loss of key management or other personnel; · The loss of major customers; · The outcome of any future litigation; · Broad market fluctuations; and economic conditions in the United States or abroad.  We could fail to attract or retain key personnel, which could be detrimental to our operations.  Our success largely depends on the efforts and abilities of our Officers and Directors.  The loss of their services could materially harm our business because of the cost and time necessary to find successors.  Such a loss would also divert management attention away from operational issues. We do not have other key employees who manage our operations.  To the extent that we are smaller than our competitors and have fewer resources, we may not be able to attract a sufficient number and quality of staff, when required.  Because our common stock is deemed a low-priced Penny stock, an investment in our common stock should be considered high risk and subject to marketability restrictions.  Since our common stock is a penny stock, as defined in Rule 3a51-1 under the Securities Exchange Act, it will be more difficult for investors to liquidate their investment even if and when a market develops for the common stock. Until the trading price of the common stock rises above $5.00 per share, if ever, trading in the common stock is subject to the penny stock rules of the Securities Exchange Act specified in rules 15g-1 through 15g-10. Those rules require broker-dealers, before effecting transactions in any penny stock, to:  · Deliver to the customer, and obtain a written receipt for, a disclosure document; · Disclose certain price information about the stock; · Disclose the amount of compensation received by the broker-dealer or any associated person of the broker-dealer; · Send monthly statements to customers with market and price information about the penny stock; and · In some circumstances, approve the purchasers account under certain standards and deliver written statements to the customer with information specified in the rules.  Consequently, the penny stock rules may restrict the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell the common stock and may affect the ability of holders to sell their common stock in the secondary market and the price at which such holders can sell any such securities. These additional procedures could also limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future.  ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules appearing on page F-1 through F-20 of this Form 10-KSB.  ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE  28     We have appointed Lawrence Scharfman & Co., CPA, P.C., as the Company's independent accountants for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. This is a change in accountants recommended by the Company's Executive Management and approved by the Company's Board of Directors.  We dismissed Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC and engaged Lawrence Scharfman & Co., CPA, P.C. on April 28, 2006.  During the most recent two fiscal years and during the portion of 2006 preceding the Boards decision, neither the Company, nor anyone engaged on its behalf, has consulted with Lawrence Scharfman & Co., CPA, P.C., regarding: (i) either the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Companys financial statements; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).  The report of Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC on the Companys consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except for Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC issuance of going concern opinions on the financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. From March 26, 2004, the date when Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC was appointed as the Companys independent accountant, and for the most recent fiscal year and the subsequent interim period ending on April 27, 2006, when Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC was dismissed as the Companys independent accountant, there were no disagreements between the Company and Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC would have caused it to make a reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its audit reports.  The change in accountants does not result from any dissatisfaction with the quality of professional services rendered by Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC, as the independent accountants of the Company.  Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC, in their letter filed as Exhibit 16 to Form 8-K filed on May 15, 2006, states in part that during the past two fiscal years, we have informed management of LitFunding Corp. of significant deficiencies in internal controls which we believe is a reportable event under 304(a)(1)(iv)(B)(1) of Regulation SB.  The Company does not disagree with Epstein Weber & Conovers statement, in that in the first quarter of 2005 the Companys audit committee was informed of Epstein Weber & Conovers inability to rely on the competency of the Companys prior Chief Financial Officer which resulted in a lack of internal controls necessary to develop reliable financial statements.  The communication from Epstein Weber & Conover to the Companys audit committee resulted in the termination of the services of its prior CFO in June of 2005.  In an attempt to prevent future significant deficiencies, the Company has retained the services of an outside consulting firm, Opus Pointe, to assist in curing deficiencies in its internal controls.   29    ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  We conducted an evaluation, with the participation of Morton Reed, our Chief Executive Officer, and Terry Gabby, our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of December 31, 2005, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities Exchange Commissions rules and forms, including to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, Messrs. Reed and Gabby have concluded that as of December 31, 2006, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level, primarily due to our inability to timely file this report on Form 10-KSB within the time frame prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  In light of our inability to timely file this report, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, we believe that the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.  Other than the deficiency and weakness described above, Mr. Reed, our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Gabby, our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are otherwise effective.  In an attempt to prevent further breakdowns in our internal control over financial and disclosure reporting, we have engaged the services of an independent financial consultant to assist us in the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP and assist in the evaluation of our financial statement disclosures. This was our only change in our internal control over financial reporting for the most recent quarter ended December 31, 2006.  ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION  None.    PART III  ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT   30    The members of our board of directors serve for one year terms and are elected at the next annual meeting of stockholders, or until their successors have been elected.  The officers serve at the pleasure of the board of directors.  Resignations and Appointments of Officers and Directors  Effective July 1, 2005, Andrew Scherr resigned as a Director of the Company.  Mr. Scherrs resignation was not a result of any disagreements with the Company.  Concurrently, the board of directors appointed Donald Hejmanowski as a Director of the Company.  Also, effective July 1, 2005, the board of directors appointed Terry Gabby as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company.  Effective November 4, 2005, Robert P. Amira resigned as Executive Vice President of the Company.  Mr. Amiras resignation was not a result of any disagreements with the Company.  Effective February22, 2007, the board of directors appointed Dennis H. Johnston as a director.  Information as to our current directors and executive officers is as follows:  NameAgeTitleTermMorton Reed74President, CEO and DirectorDecember 2000Stanley Weiner64Director and VP of FinanceDirector since October 2003 &VP of Finance since December 2000Dennis H. Johnston53DirectorFebruary 2008Terry Gabby63CFO and TreasurerJuly 2005  Duties, Responsibilities and Experience  Morton Reed, Ph.D., 73, has served as President, CEO and a Director of the Company since December 2000.  Dr. Reed served in the United States Marine Corps during the Korean War.  After returning from overseas he attended UCLA for his undergraduate studies in English and Philosophy.  From 1960 through 1980 he served as an executive in several business ventures:  CEO of Cathay Studios, from 1960 to 1968; CEO of Orient Limited of Nevada from 1968 to 1972; President and Chairman of AAlpha Mortgage Company from 1970 to 1982.  During this time he continued with his education earning a Masters Degree in Psychology form Antioch University in 1973 and a Doctorate in philosophy in Clinical Psychology from California Graduate Institute in 1975.  In 1996 Dr. Reed joined Magnolia Studios a post production facility in Burbank, CA and helped effect a rate of that company to Millennium Studios which appointed him interim CEO.  He left Millennium in 1999 and joined Case Financial, a litigation funding company where he served as VP of Sales.  In November 2000, Dr. Reed left Case Financial to for LitFunding Corp. where he remains as President.  Dr. Reed is not an officer or director of any other reporting company.  Stanley B. Weiner, 64, has served as a Director of the Company since October 2003 and Vice President of Finance of the Company since December 2000.  Mr. Weiner has more than 35  31    years experience creating and running businesses.  Mr. Weiner was the founding officer of Gemini Financial Corporation, a NASD Broker/Dealer from 1970 through 1975, President of APA, Real Estate Syndication Company from 1975 through 1978, Managing Partner of Agri-World Partnership from 1978 through 1983, an agricultural project syndication company with offices throughout Europe and the Middle East.  Mr. Weiner was a Founding Officer/President of Regent Properties from 1985 through 1990, and Chief Executive Officer of Wise Industries from 1990 through 1993, a company specializing in pollution control devices.  In 1978, Mr. Weiner founded Western Pacific Investment Corporation, centers and agricultural properties in addition to packaging many tax-sheltered investments.  As a result of the foregoing activities, Mr. Weiner has extensive experience in marketing, acquiring, financing and developing commercial and agricultural property, negotiating agreements and packaging transactions.  Mr. Weiner received his Bachelor of Arts degrees in both Psychology and Economics from California State University at Long Beach in 1966.  He also did graduate work in both fields at UCLA.  Mr. Weiner has in the past held a National Association of Securities Dealers Principals license and is a licensed Real Estate Broker.  Mr. Weiner is not an officer or director of any other reporting company.  Dennis H. Johnston, 53, is a practicing attorney in the State of California and has over twenty-eight years experience in representing financial institutions, public and privately traded corporations and has successfully completed in excess of three billion dollars worth of acquisitions during his practice.  For the past 12 years, Mr. Johnston has maintained his own law practice specializing in public companies and related securities transactions. He has negotiated and implemented many public company mergers, acquisitions and changes in control for companies ranging from financial institutions, to manufacturing companies to the highly publicized Internet related entities. In the last 2 years, Dennis has completed three reverse mergers and recently completed the merger of a private company into a fully reporting shell through the United States Bankruptcy Court in a Chapter 11 proceeding. In addition to advising clients on corporate restructuring and securities matters, his particular expertise is in representing clients before governmental regulatory agencies including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Department of Corporations, the National Association of Securities Dealers and other administrative and governmental agencies.  Prior to the formation of his own law firm, Mr. Johnston had been a partner with two highly recognized national law firms including managing the savings and loan practice at Manatt, Phelps, Rothenberg and Tunney before being recruited to the highly publicized firm known as Wyman, Bautzer, Kuchel and Silbert were he was responsible for establishing and managing the firm's national financial institutions practice.  Mr. Johnston graduated with honors from UCLA in 1975, with a Bachelor of Administration in business and economics and received his Juris Doctor degree with Dean's List Honors from Loyola University of Los Angeles where he was a Note and Comment Editor of The Loyola Law Review, a Founding Member of the Loyola International and Comparative Law Journal and the author of a published article entitled "Vicarious Liability Of Controlling Persons Under The Securities Act Of 1934", (1977) 11 Loyola L.A. L. Review 131. Dennis Johnston was admitted to the State Bar of California in November of 1978. Additional professional affiliations include  32    the Los Angeles County Bar Association and the American Bar Association. Mr. Johnston is not an officer or director of any other reporting company.  Terry Gabby, 63, has served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company since July 1, 2005.  Mr. Gabby has over 30 years experience in executive management, auditing and finance. As the senior auditor for a regional audit firm, Seidman & Seidman CPA's, he was the senior in charge of audits for several publicly held companies in the casino and manufacturing industries. From 1981 to 1991, Mr. Gabby was the corporate director of internal audit for Sahara Resorts, Inc., a publicly traded company with several gaming subsidiaries and time-share properties. As a consultant for various clients, Mr. Gabby has developed and implemented financial accounting systems, internal control systems and participated in establishing review procedures for compliance testing as required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The past seven years, Mr. Gabby has held the executive positions of Chief Financial Officer and Controller for several large tribal gaming enterprises located in several state jurisdictions. These enterprises were business start-ups requiring loan acquisitions, funding distributions, construction cost control and the development of financial reporting systems. Mr. Gabby earned his Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas College of Business Administration in 1973. Mr. Gabby will receive a salary of $55,000 annually, and will receive a signing bonus of 10,000 options to purchase shares of the Registrant's common stock at $0.41 per share. Mr. Gabby is not an officer or director of any other reporting company.  Election of Directors and Officers.  Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Officers are appointed to serve until the meeting of the Board of Directors following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.  No Executive Officer or Director of the Company has been the subject of any Order, Judgment, or Decree of any Court of competent jurisdiction, or any regulatory agency permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring suspending or otherwise limiting him from acting as an investment advisor, underwriter, broker or dealer in the securities industry, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of an investment company, bank, savings and loan association, or insurance company or from engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with any such activity or in connection with the purchase or sale of any securities.  No Executive Officer or Director of the Company has been convicted in any criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations) or is the subject of a criminal proceeding which is currently pending.  No Executive Officer or Director of the Company is the subject of any pending legal proceedings.  Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance   33    Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based upon a review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and written representations from our executive officers and directors, we believe that as of the date of this filing they were all current in there filings.  Audit Committee and Financial Expert  We do not have an Audit Committee, our directors perform some of the same functions of an Audit Committee, such as: recommending a firm of independent certified public accountants to audit the annual financial statements; reviewing the independent auditors independence, the financial statements and their audit report; and reviewing management's administration of the system of internal accounting controls. The Company does not currently have a written audit committee charter or similar document.  We have no financial expert. We believe the cost related to retaining a financial expert at this time is prohibitive. Further, because of our start-up operations, we believe the services of a financial expert are not warranted.  Code of Ethics  A code of ethics relates to written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:  (1) Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; (2) Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that are filed with, or submitted to, the Commission and in other public communications made by an issuer; (3) Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; (4) The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and (5) Accountability for adherence to the code.  We have not adopted a corporate code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions.  Our decision to not adopt such a code of ethics results from our having only three officers and three directors operating as the management for the Company. We believe that as a result of the limited interaction which occurs having such a small management structure for the Company eliminates the current need for such a code, in that violations of such a code would be reported to the party generating the violation.  34     Nominating Committee  We do not have a Nominating Committee or Nominating Committee Charter. Our board of directors, perform some of the functions associated with a Nominating Committee. We have elected not to have a Nominating Committee in that we are a development stage company with limited operations and resources.  ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  The following table sets forth the cash compensation of the Companys executive officers during the last three fiscal years of the Company.  The remuneration described in the table does not include the cost of the Company of benefits furnished to the named executive officers, including premiums for health insurance and other benefits provided to such individuals that are extended in connection with the conduct of the Companys business.  Mr. Reed voluntarily stopped taking salary in mid 2003 to assist the company in the financing of ongoing litigation.  He received $175,845 out of the $252,000 and accrued the remaining $76,155 in 2003.  He resumed taking salary in 2004 but took only $150,000 of the $252,000 and accrued the remaining $102,000.  In 2005 he received $118,750 out of the $252,000 and accrued the remaining $133,250. In 2006 he received $64,927 out of the $252,000 and accrued the remaining $187,073.  In 2004 Mr. Reed received 700,00 options for common stock, these options vested at date of grant.  The options were issued for services.  During 2005 Mr. Reed was issued 1,000,000 options for common stock, these options vested at the date of grant.  Mr. Reed Received $16,716 as reimbursement for his rent, telephone, utilities and automobile expenses in 2004.  In 2005 he received $26,019 as reimbursement for these expenses. In 2006 he received $24,880 as reimbursement for these expenses.  In 2005 Mr. Reed received $80,750 as a board member, $24,500 in fees and $56,250 in warrants.  The warrants 112,500 issued for common stock were granted on January 20, 2005 with immediate vesting.  The warrants authorized the purchase of common stock at $0.20 per share and expire on dates beginning on August 6, 2009 through May 6, 2010. In 2006 Mr. Reed accrued $31,500 as a board member.  In 2004 Mr. Cohen was reimbursed for medical and lodging expenses amounting to $18,360 these expenses were reimbursed in 2005 for $9,089.  Mr. Cohen resigned as Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer effective June 15, 2005.  Mr. Gabby entered in to an employment agreement effective June 29, 2005 to serve as the companies Chief Financial Officer with an annual salary of $55,000.  Mr. Gabby received 10,000 options at $0.41 per share expiring on July 1, 2007.  These options were vested at the date of grant.  Mr. Gabby received 50,000 options in November 2006 exercisable at $0.04 per share and expire on November 21, 2009. In November 2006 Mr. Gabby received 50,000 warrants exercisable at $0.04 per share and expire on November 27, 2009. The fair value of these options and warrants is calculated to be $4,425.      35       Summary Compensation Table For Fiscal Year- Ended 2005 and 2006 Name and Principal Position





(a)Year








(b)Salary
($)







(c)Bonus
($)







(d)Stock Awards
($)






(e)Options Awards
($)






(f)Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)






(g)Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)

(h)All Other Compensation
($)





(i)Total
($)







(j)Morton Reed
President,
CEO &
Director2005
2006252,000
252,000NONE
NONENONE
NONE$779,950
NONENONE
NONENONE
NONE$110,269
$56,380$1,138,719
$308,380David
Cohen
Former CFO,
Secretary &
Treasurer2005125,000NONENONENONENONENONE$9,089$134,089Terry
Gabby
CFO2005
200655,000
55,000NONE
NONENONE
NONE$4,891
$4,425NONE
NONENONE
NONENONE
NONE$59,891
$59,425                             36     OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR- END AS OF 12/31/2006   37     Name















(a)Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable










(b)Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable










(c)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
(#)





(d)Option Exercise Price
($)












(e)Options Expiration Date













(f)Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)








(g)Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)






(h)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)

(i)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)
(j)Morton Reed, Ph.D. President, CEO & Director325,500
250,000
500,000
500,000
37,500
18,750
18,750
18,750
18,750NONENONE$1.00
$0.30
$0.53
$0.99
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.202/3/07
12/21/14
1/20/15
9/6/08
1/20/10
8/6/09
11/6/09
2/6/10
5/6/10NONENONENONENONEDavid Cohen, Former CFO, Secretary & Treasurer (11)NONENONENONENONENONENONENONENONENONETerry
Gabby, CFO10,000
50,000
50,000NONE
NONENONE
NONENONE
NONE7/1/07
11/21/09
11/27/09NONE
NONENONE
NONENONE
NONENONE
NONEStanley
Weiner, Board Member37,500
18,750
18,750
18,750
18,750NONENONE$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.201/20/10
8/6/09
11/6/09
2/6/10
5/6/10NONENONENONENONEDavid Wallace, Board Member37,500
18,750
18,750
5,000
2,500
2,500NONENONE$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.201/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10NONENONENONENONEHoward Appel,
Board Member37,500
18,750
18,750
5,000
2,500
2,500NONENONE$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.201/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10NONENONENONENONEAndrew Scherr, Board Member37,500
18,750
18,750
5,000
2,500
2,500NONENONE$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.201/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10
1/20/10NONENONENONENONE    38      All options and warrants have been authorized by the full Board of Director.  All options and warrants issued have been issued for services rendered.  DIRECTOR COMPENSATION For Fiscal Year- Ending 12/31/2006  Name







(a)Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)



(b)Stock Awards
($)





(c)Option Awards
($)





(d)Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)




(e)Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

(f)All Other Compensation
($)





(g)Total
($)






(h)Morton Reed, President, CEO & Director$31,500NONENONENONENONENONE$31,500Stanley Weiner$31,500NONENONENONENONENONE$31,500Donald Hejmanowski$31,500NONENONENONENONENONE$31,500 In July 2005 Mr. Donald Hejmanowski received 150,000 shares of common stock valued at $60,000 as a signing bonus for joining the companies Board of Directors.  On November 2, 2005 the company issued 150,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Hejmanowski for Director services-the value of the shares is $42,000.  The amounts in the All Other Compensations column for the Board members is the fair value of warrants that were issued to the Board members for their past services.  All of the warrants were vested on the grant date.  None have been exercised.  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS  Morton Reed  Effective September 5, 2002, we entered into an employment agreement with Morton Reed wherein Mr. Reed agreed to serve as the Companys Chief Executive Officer and President.  The term of employment is for four (4) years.  We agreed to pay Mr. Reed annual compensation of $252,000. In addition to the cash compensation, Mr. Reed is entitled to the use of a Company vehicle.  Mr. Reed voluntarily stopped taking salary in mid 2003 to assist the Company in the financing of ongoing litigation.  Mr. Reed resumed taking a salary in 2004 but took only $150,000.  Mr. Reed has agreed to accrue such portions of his salary ($355,915 as of December 31, 2005 and $543,000 as of December 31,2006) as deemed relevant by the board of directors until such time as the Company is adequately capitalized and able to pay such salary.    39      David Cohen  On April 2, 2003, we entered into an employment agreement with David Cohen wherein Mr. Cohen agreed to serve as the Companys Chief Financial Officer.  We agreed to pay Mr. Cohen a sign on bonus of $8,541 in shares of our common stock, an annual salary of $125,000, and 100,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock at $0.01 per share.  Of the 100,000 options, 25,000 expire on June 2, 2007, 25,000 expire on October 2, 2007, 25,000 expire on January 2, 2008 and 25,000 expire on April 2, 2008.  Effective June 15, 2005, Mr. Cohen resigned as Chief Financial officer of the Company.  Terry Gabby  On June 29, 2005, we entered into an employment agreement with Terry Gabby wherein Mr. Gabby agreed to serve as the Companys Chief Financial Officer. We agreed to pay Mr. Gabby an annual salary of $55,000.  On July 1, 2005, we granted Mr. Gabby 10,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock at $0.41 per share which expire on July 1, 2007. We granted Mr. Gabby 50,000 options in November, 2006, exercisable at $0.04 per share and expiring on November 21, 2009. We granted Mr. Gabby 50,000 warrants in November, 2006, exercisable at $0.04 per share and expiring on November 27, 2009.  Director Compensation and Other Arrangements  All directors will be reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending Board or committee, when established, meetings.  All directors also receive $3,500 per month, The Board stopped the monthly director fees beginning in October, 2006.   From time to time, certain directors who are not employees may receive shares of our common stock.  Compensation Committee  We currently do not have a compensation committee of the board of directors.  Until a formal committee is established our entire board of directors will review all forms of compensation provided to our executive officers, directors, consultants and employees, including stock compensation.  Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year   On November 21 2006, we granted Terry Gabby, the CFO of the Company, an option to purchase 50,000 options of our common stock at $0.04 per share.  The option is exercisable for three years.  We believe that the grant of the option was exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2).  Employment Agreements  Morton Reed  Effective September 5, 2002, we entered into an employment agreement with Morton Reed wherein Mr. Reed agreed to serve as the Companys Chief Executive Officer and President.  The term of employment is for four (4) years.  We agreed to pay Mr. Reed annual compensation of $252,000. In addition to the cash compensation, Mr. Reed is entitled to the use  40    of a Company vehicle.  Mr. Reed voluntarily stopped taking salary in mid 2003 to assist the Company in the financing of ongoing litigation.  Mr. Reed resumed taking a salary in 2004 but took only $150,000.  Mr. Reed has agreed to accrue such portions of his salary ($355,915 as of December 31, 2005) as deemed relevant by the board of directors until such time as the Company is adequately capitalized and able to pay such salary.  David Cohen  On April 2, 2003, we entered into an employment agreement with David Cohen wherein Mr. Cohen agreed to serve as the Companys Chief Financial Officer.  We agreed to pay Mr. Cohen a sign on bonus of $8,541 in shares of our common stock, an annual salary of $125,000, and 100,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock at $0.01 per share.  Of the 100,000 options, 25,000 expire on June 2, 2007, 25,000 expire on October 2, 2007, 25,000 expire on January 2, 2008 and 25,000 expire on April 2, 2008.  Effective June 15, 2005, Mr. Cohen resigned as Chief Financial officer of the Company.  Terry Gabby  On June 29, 2005, we entered into an employment agreement with Terry Gabby wherein Mr. Gabby agreed to serve as the Companys Chief Financial Officer. We agreed to pay Mr. Gabby an annual salary of $55,000.  On July 1, 2005, we granted Mr. Gabby 10,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock at $0.41 per share which expire on July 1, 2007.  Director Compensation and Other Arrangements  All directors will be reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending Board or committee, when established, meetings.  From time to time, certain directors who are not employees may receive shares of our common stock.  Compensation Committee  We currently do not have a compensation committee of the board of directors.  Until a formal committee is established our entire board of directors will review all forms of compensation provided to our executive officers, directors, consultants and employees, including stock compensation.   Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year  On August 15, 2005, we granted Dermot J. Ryan an option to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock at $0.41 per share.  The option is exercisable for two years. We believe that the grant of the option was exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2).  On September 6, 2005, we granted Dr. Morton Reed an option to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at $0.99 per share.  The option is exercisable for three years.  We  41    believe that the grant of the option was exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2).  On September 19, 2005, we granted Stanley Weiner, a Director of the Company, an option to purchase 300,000 options of our common stock at $0.99 per share.  The option is exercisable for three years.  We believe that the grant of the option was exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2).  ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT  The following table presents information, to the best of our knowledge, about the beneficial ownership of our common stock on December 31, 2006 held by those persons known to beneficially own more than 5% of our capital stock and by our directors and executive officers.  The percentage of beneficial ownership for the following table is based on 30,738,902 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2006.  The percentage of beneficial ownership table does not take into consideration a total of 1,500,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock that may be converted into 1,500,000 shares of common stock upon effecting a spin-off transaction of Global Universal Film Group, a wholly-owned subsidiary.  Further, the following ownership table does not take into consideration the recent issuance of 48,000,000 shares of common stock in connection with the Companys agreement of March 5, 2007 with Rochester Capital Partners, as set forth elsewhere in this report.  Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes those shares of common stock over which the stockholder has sole or shared voting or investment power. It also includes (unless footnoted) shares of common stock that the stockholder has a right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2006 pursuant to options, warrants, conversions privileges or other rights.  The percentage ownership of the outstanding common stock, however, is based on the assumption, expressly required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, that only the person or entity whose ownership is being reported has converted options or warrants into shares of our common stock.  Security Ownership of Management Name of Beneficial Owner (1)Number
of Shares Beneficially OwnedPercent of
Class Beneficially Owned (2)Morton Reed, Ph.D., President, CEO, Chairman
c/o 6375 S. Pecos Rd., Ste. 217
Las Vegas, NV 891208,217,548 (3)27%Stanley Weiner, VP of Finance and a Director
c/o 6375 S. Pecos Rd., Ste. 217
Las Vegas, NV 891201,349,700 (4)4%  42     Donald Hejmanowski, Director
c/o 6375 S. Pecos Rd., Ste. 217
Las Vegas, NV 89120454,5201%Terry Gabby, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
c/o 6373 S. Pecos Rd., Ste. 217
Las Vegas, NV 89120110,000 (5)0%Directors and Officers as a Group10,131,76833% 1. As used in this table, beneficial ownership means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or shared investment power with respect to a security (i.e., thepower to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, a security).  It also includes shares of common stock that the stockholder has the right to acquire within 60 days of December 31, 2006, which are treated as outstanding for the purpose of determining the percent of class by such stockholder. NOTE: These figures do not include the March 2007 issuance of 8,000,000 shares issued to Dr. Reed in exchange for $350,000 in back wages. The 8,000,000 shares were subsequently sold to Rochester Capital Partners. 2. Figures are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent. 3. Includes 1,282,500 options to purchase shares of our common stock at prices ranging from $0.30 to $1.00 per share and 162,500 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock at prices ranging from $0.10 to $0.20 per share. 4. Includes 650,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock at prices ranging from $0.33 to $0.99 per share and 37,500 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock at $0.20 per share. 5. Mr. Gabby holds 60,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock at a range of $0.41 to $0.04   per share and  50,000 warrants to purchase our common stock at $0.04 per share       Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners  Name of Beneficial Owner (1)Number
of Shares Beneficially Owned (1)Percent of
Class Beneficially Owned (1) (2)Davric Corporation (3)
Jerry Polis Family Trust
Jerry Polis IRA
510 4th St., #1A
Encinitas, CA 920243,018,0009.8%Imperial Capital Holdings, LLC (4)
Apdo. 10559-1000
San Jose, Costa Rica2,100,0006.8%Gary Rasmussen (5)
Rochester Capital Partners
3155 E. Patrick Lane, #1
Las Vegas, NV 891202,065,0006.7%Beneficial Owners as a Group17,314,76856.3%  43      1. As used in this table, beneficial ownership means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or shared investment power with respect to a security (i.e., thepower to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, a security).  It also includes shares of common stock that the stockholder has the right to acquire within 60 days of December 1, 2006, which are treated as outstanding for the purpose of determining the percent of class by such stockholder. 2. Figures are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent. 3. Davric Corporation purchased 678,049 shares of our common stock at $0.41 per shares in December of 2004.  The stock had not been issued until August 28, 2006 and due to the drop in our stock price we issued an additional 2,101,951 shares of our common stock.  The 2,780,000 shares of common stock were valued at $0.10 per share and the 2,780,000 shares are being registered in this registration statement.  Jerry Polis, President of Davric has voting, investment and dispositive power over the shares of common stock owned by Davric. An additional 230,000 shares were purchased in the open market by Mr. Polis. 4. Includes 800,000 shares currently owned, an additional 500,000 shares to be issued and registered hereunder, and another 800,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired if Imperial converts its 400,000 shares of Series A 12% Convertible Preferred Stock. The percentage figure after the Offering assumes that none of the 2,100,000 shares are sold and that Imperial retains all 9,000,000 shares of common stock that Imperial may acquire pursuant to the Investment Agreement (a total of 11,100,000 shares). Maritza Sanabria is the Managing Director of Imperial Capital Holdings, and exercises voting, investment and dispositive power over the shares of common stock owned by Imperial. 5. Mr. Rasmussen holds 665,000 shares directly in his name. The amount of shares includes 650,000 shares owned by Rochester Capital Partners, of which Mr. Rasmussen is its General Partner, and said 500,000 shares are being registered hereunder. Mr. Rasmussen has voting, investment and dispositive power of all shares owned by the partnership.  Additionally, the amount of shares includes 750,000 shares of common stock that may be acquired by Mr. Rasmussen upon the conversion of a like number of shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred. Mr. Rasmussen acquired 750,000 shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in connection with the acquisition of  Global Universal by LitFunding in March, 2006. NOTE:  These figures do not include the March 7, 2007 issuance of 40,000,000 shares issued to Rochester Capital Partners, of which Mr. Rasmussen is the General Partner and exercises control over such shares.  ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  Employment Agreement with Morton Reed  Effective September 5, 2002, we entered into an employment agreement with Morton Reed wherein Mr. Reed agreed to serve as the Companys Chief Executive Officer and President.  The term of employment is for four (4) years.  We agreed to pay Mr. Reed annual compensation of $252,000. In addition to the cash compensation, Mr. Reed is entitled to the use of a Company vehicle.  Mr. Reed voluntarily stopped taking salary in mid 2003 to assist the Company in the financing of ongoing litigation.  Mr. Reed resumed taking a salary in 2004 but took only $150,000.  Mr. Reed has agreed to accrue such portions of his salary as deemed relevant by the board of directors until such time as the Company is adequately capitalized and able to pay such salary.  As of December 31, 2005, Mr. Reed had accrued salary of $355,915.           44    ITEM 13. EXHIBITS  (a) Exhibits  Exhibit NumberDescription2.1Plan and agreement of merger between RP Entertainment Inc., RP Acquisition Corp. and LitFunding Corp. dated February 21, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2003)2.2U.S. Bankruptcy Court Stipulation between LitFunding Corporation and Petitioning Creditors dated November 14, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on December 4, 2003)2.3U. S. Bankruptcy Court Notice of Entry of Judgment (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on December 4, 2003)2.4U.S. Bankruptcy Court Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization dated April 7, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2004)2.5Agreement and Plan of Merger between LitFunding Inc., LFDG Subsidiary Corp. and Easy Money Express Inc. dated February 7th, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2006)3(i).1Articles of Incorporation dated July 2, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form SB-2 filed on June 19, 2001)3(i).2Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated September 4, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form SB-2 filed on June 19, 2001)3(ii).1By-Laws dated September 2, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form SB-2 filed on June 19, 2001)3(ii).2Amendment of By-laws dated March 5, 1997 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form SB-2 filed on June 19, 2001)4.1Common Stock Certificate Form (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form SB-2 filed on June 19, 2001)10.1Agreement between RP Entertainment Inc. and Brutus Productions dated May 1, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form SB-2A filed on August 3, 2001)10.2Amended 2002 Employee Stock Compensation Plan Prospectus dated September 2, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form S-8 filed on September 10, 2003)10.3Amended 2002 Employee Stock Compensation Plan Certification of Plan Adoption dated September 2, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form S-8 filed on September 10, 2003)10.42004 Stock Option Plan dated March 9, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form DEF 14A filed on July 13, 2004)10.5Employment Agreement between LitFunding USA and Stephen D. King dated October 2004 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form S-8 filed on October 28, 2004)10.6Investment Agreement between LitFunding Corp. and Dutchess Private Equities Fund, L.P. dated January 14, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on January 21, 2005)10.7Registration Rights Agreement between LitFunding Corp. and Dutchess Private Equities Fund, L.P. dated January 14, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on January 21, 2005)10.8Option Agreement between Silver Dollar Productions Inc. and Morton Reed dated January 31, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form PRE 14C filed on March 21, 2005)10.9Certificate of Designation dated July 25, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form S-8 filed on July 28, 2005)10.10Binding letter of intent of merger between LitFunding Corp. and Cashwize Inc. dated September 15, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on September 19, 2005)10.11Letter of intent of merger between LitFunding Corp. and Easy Money Express Inc. dated December 14, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on January 3, 2006)10.12Binding Letter of Intent between Silver Dollar Productions, Inc. and Global Universal Film, Group Ent. Inc. dated December 21, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on January 12, 2006)10.13Investment Agreement with Imperial Capital Holdings, dated January 16, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on February 1, 2006)10.14Registration Rights Agreement with Imperial Capital Holdings, dated January 19, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on February 1, 2006)  45     10.15Placement Agent Agreement with Brewer Financial Services, LLC., dated January 16, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on February 1, 2006)10.162006 Non-QualifiedStock Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form S-8 filed on February 28, 2006)10.19Share Exchange Agreement with Easy Money Express, Inc., dated March 31, 200620Letter to Shareholders dated March 11, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2003)21List of Subsidiaries : California LitFunding, E.Evolution Expeditions and LitFunding USA (Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Form 10-KSB filed on March 21, 2005)31.1*Certification of Morton Reed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act31.2*Certification of Terry Gabby pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act32.1*Certification of Morton Reed pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act32.2*Certification of Terry Gabby pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act   ______ * Filed herewith.  ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES  (1) AUDIT FEES  The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC, for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our Form 10-QSB or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for fiscal year 2005 was $50,346 and the aggregate fees billed for the review of the financial statements included in our Form 10-QSB or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for fiscal year 2006 was $25,035.  The aggregate fee billed for professional services rendered by Lawrence Scharfman & Co., CPA, P.C., for the audit of our annual financial statements for fiscal year 2006 was $25,000.  (2) AUDIT-RELATED FEES  The aggregate fees billed by Kabani & Company, our accountant for fiscal 2003, in fiscal year 2004 was $5,000 which was related to a consent required in the filing of the SB-2 filed in December 2004.  (3) TAX FEES  Not applicable.  (4) ALL OTHER FEES  Not applicable.  (5) AUDIT COMMITTEE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES  46     We do not have an audit committee.  (6) If greater than 50 percent, disclose the percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's full-time, permanent employees.  Not applicable.  47    SIGNATURES  In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  LITFUNDING CORP.   By: /s/ Morton Reed Morton Reed, President  Date: May 10, 2007  In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.  Signature Title Date    /s/ Morton Reed President, CEO, May 10, 2007 Morton Reed Chairman,    /s/ Stanley Weiner VP Finance, Director May 10, 2007 Stanley Weiner    /s/ Dennis H. Johnston Director May 10, 2007 Dennis H. Johnston    /s/ Terry Gabby Chief Financial Officer May 10, 2007 Terry Gabby   48    TABLE OF CONTENTS  PAGES  REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMF-1  F-2CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETF-3CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONSF-4CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYF-5CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWSF-6NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSF-7  F-21   49    Lawrence Scharfman & Co., CPA P.A. Certified Public Accountants  18 E. Sunrise Highway, #203 9608 Honey Bell Circle Freeport, NY 11520 Boynton Beach, FL 33437 Telephone: (516) 771-5900 Telephone: (561) 733-0296 Facsimile:  (516) 771-2598 Facsimile:   (561) 740-0613    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT  Lit Funding Corp. 6375 S. Pecos Road, Suite 217 Las Vegas, Nevada 89120  We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Litfunding Corp. (a Nevada corporation) as of December 31, 2006 and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys Manage­ment. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial state­ments based on our audit. The statements for 2004 and prior years were audited by another auditor,  We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and dis­closures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of LitFunding Corp. as of December 31, 2006 and the results of its operations in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The company has had difficulty in generating sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations and is dependent on managements ability to develop profitable operations. These factors, among others may raise substantial doubt as to their ability to continue as a going concern.  Boynton Beach, Florida May 9, 2007     F-1      MEMBER: American Institute Certified Public Accountants    Florida Institute Certified Public Accountants - LICENSED IN FLORIDA & NEW YORK -   F-2        LitFunding Corp Consolidated Balance Sheets  For the year endedDecember 31,2006AssetsCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents$1,618Accounts receivable, net30,760Contingent advances less reserves for unsuccessfulresolution of lawsuits398,025Note receivable174,000Total current assets604,403Fixed assets, net44,237Total fixed assets44,237Other assetsOther assets360,332Total other assets360,332Total assets$1,008,972Liabilities and Stockholders' EquityLiabilities not subject to compromiseAccounts payable$832,071Accrued expenses385,586Deferred revenue216,672Notes payable1,171,806Investor participation obligations724,500Interest payable-Total current liabilities not subject to compromise$3,330,635Liabilities subject to compromiseTrade and miscellaneous claimsDebentures190,000Total  liabilities subject to compromise190,000Total liabilities$3,520,635Stockholders' equity:Series A Convertible preferred Stock, par value $0.001,2,000,000 shares authorized, 400,000 shares issued and outstanding400Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001, 1,500,000 shares authorized, 1,500,000 shares issued and outstanding1,500Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 sharesauthorized, 28,988,902 and 16,217,402 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively28,988Shares authorized & unissued12,000  F-3     Subscription Payable5,000Subscription Receivable43,500Additional paid-in capital8,655,403Additional paid-in capital Preferred A99,600Accumulated (deficit)(11,225,266)(2,511,673)$1,008,972                                                    F-4        LitFunding Corp Statements of Operations  For the years endingDecember 31,20062005Net Revenue$644,040$355,264Expenses:Reserve for unsuccessful resolution of lawsuits$$76,950General and administrative expenses1,59,8452,986,487Consulting fees - related party8,301Financing expense45,90667,288Depreciation & Amortization23,55828,467Preferred stock dividend19,9931,245Total operating expenses1,749,3023,168,738Net operating (loss)(1,105,262)(2,813,474)Other income (expenses):Other income10,00073,953Interest expense(62,685)(57,039)Rental IncomeAmortization of debt discount130,000(677,484)Total other income (expenses)77,315(660,570)Loss before reorganization items,extraordinary gain and income taxes(3,474,043)Bad debt in connection with share issuance(498,000)Reorganization items:Legal feesLoss before extraordinary gain and income taxes(1,027,947)(3,972,043)Extraordinary gain, net of income taxes-Income (Loss) before Income taxes(1,027,947)(3,972,043)Income tax (benefit) provision--Net Income (loss)$(1,027,947)$(3,972,043)Basic Earnings (loss) per share:Before Extraordinary item(0.05)(0.28)Extraordinary itemTotal(0.05)(0.28)Diluted Earnings (loss) per shareBefore Extraordinary item(0.05)(0.28)Extraordinary itemTotal(0.05)(0.28)Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:Basic19,099,65214,419,498Diluted$19,099,652$14,419,498  F-5


LitFunding Corp Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity  Common StockPreferred StockAdditionalTotalpaid inSubscriptionDeferredAccumulatedStockholders'SharesAmountSharesAmountCapitalPayableCompensation(Deficit)EquityBalance, December 31, 200411,220,06311,221--4,611,310--(6,225,276)(1,602,745)shares issued for cash2,291,9512,292800,0008001,136,608---1,139,700Shares authorized & unissued327,139---327,139Shares issued for services757,500757--415,705---416,462Shares issued in settlement157,888157--67,236---67,394Shares issued in settlement of notes600,000600--647,891---648,491Shares issued in lieu of interest75,00075--38,675---38,750Warrants and Options issued----739,979---739,979Warrants and Options exercised665,000665--32,335---33,000Options exercised  - related party450,000450--44,550---45,000Subscription payable-----327,139--327,139Net (loss) for the year ended(3,972,043)(3,972,043)Balance, December 31, 200516,217,402$16,217800,000$800$8,061,428$327,139$-$(10,197,319)$(1,791,735)Shares issued for cash1,265,3341,265145,268147,333Shares issued for investment15,000153,5803,595Shares authorized & unissued327,139327,817Shares issued for services7,349,8927,350378,826378,826Shares issued in settlement of debt1,406,6081,407256,997258,404Shares issued for preferred dividend96,000969,0249,120Shares issued in settlement of notes2,000,0002,000198,000200,000Shares issued for financing704,00070465,17665,880Shares issued in lieu of interest14,666151,4521,487Share issued in exchange of preferred800,000800(400,000)99,200100,000Warrants and options issued320,00032035,20735,527


F-6


Warrants and Options exercised650,0006503,6004,250Shares Cancelled(1,850,000)(1,850)400,000(4000(933,918)(935,768)Options exercised  related party4,4254,425Subscription payable(322,139)Net (Loss)(1,027,947)(1,027,947)For the year endedDecember 31,2006Balance, December31,200628,988,90228,9918,655,403(1,027,947)(2511,673)


F-7


LitFunding Corp Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow  For the years endingDecember 31,20062005Cash flows from operating activitiesNet income (loss)$(1,027,947)$(3,474,043)Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by (used in operating activities)Extraordinary gain on settlement with IEP creditorsGain on forgiveness of capital lease obligationGain on Discount of pre-petition debtDepreciation and amortization23,55828,467Reserve for unsuccessful resolution of lawsuits76,950Reserve for Doubtful ReceivablesLoss on disposal of assetShare-based compensation414,353825,124Common stock issued in settlements493,88567,394Share-based interest payments1,467Shares cancelled(935,768)38,750Gain on participation obligation(15,000)Debt discount amortization(130,0000)603,558Changes in assets and liabilities:Trade and other accounts receivable(2,790)84,530Other assets(138,982)(20,881)Contingent advances(572,825)(769,500)Accounts payable and accrued expenses123,945315,705Trade and other claims subject to compromise(241,193)Note receivable(73,819)(100,000)Deferred revenue75,004141,668Net cash (used in) operating activities(1,749,919)(2,438,471)Cash flows from investing activities:Purchases of property and equipment(3,733)Net cash (used in) investing activities(3,733)Cash flows from financing activities:Cash from issuance of common stock147,333441,700Cash from exercise of options & warrants4,25077,550Cash from issuance of preferred stock200,000Proceeds from notes payable1,106,806222,500Subscription Payable76,533Proceeds from investor participation borrowingsProceeds from investor obligations450,500702,500Principal repayments on capital lease obligationsValue of Warrants issued35,527387,021Net cash provided by financing activities1,744,4162,107,804Increase  (decrease) in cash(5,503)(334,401)Cash - beginning of period7,121341,522Cash - ending of period$1,618$7,121Supplemental disclosures:Interest paid62,68557,039Income taxes paid$-$-Shares issued for services$378,826416,462Number of shares issued for services7,349,892757,500Shares issued for debt$458,404754,634Number of shares issued for debt3,406,608832,888Imputed value of warrants issued with debt-$   F-8      F-9    LitFunding Corp Notes  Note 1 - Summary of Accounting Policies  LitFunding Corp. ("The Company") was incorporated in the state of Nevada. The Company serves as a holding company for its wholly owned subsidiaries, California LitFunding and LitFunding USA ("The Companies"), both incorporated in the State of Nevada. California LitFunding was the entity that conducted substantially all operations during 2004, and owned substantially all of the operating assets, employed all the personnel, and paid the obligations of all the corporations. LitFunding USA began assuming some operations in the last quarter of 2004 and in 2005 assumed responsibility for substantially all the operations of all the corporations.  California LitFunding is the successor-in-interest by merger to the "original" company in the three primary entity corporate structure that now exists. It has been in the business of investing in litigation recoveries since 2000. In summary, California LitFunding raised capital and advanced this capital to various law firms pursuant to "Settlement Agreements". LitFunding USA resumed the business of litigation funding subsequent to June 17th, 2004, after the United States Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the LitFunding Corp. and California LitFunding joint plans of reorganization. LitFunding USA pursues this business by itself and through several wholly owned limited liability companies ("LLC's"). Settlement Agreements provide that the funds advanced shall be repaid to the Companies, plus a fee, when the lawsuits referenced in the agreement ultimately settle. The exact amount of the fee payable on the funds advanced depends upon the length of time the funds are outstanding, up to a fixed limit. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreements, the Companies' contractual right to payment is limited to the funds ultimately paid to the law firm from the specified lawsuit, or lawsuits, in which the funds are invested or expended.  On January 23, 2003, the Company completed a merger with RP Entertainment, Inc., a publicly held Nevada corporation, through a newly formed entity, RP Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation, as a wholly owned subsidiary of RP Entertainment. On February 25, 2003, the Company entered into an Agreement of Merger with California LitFunding, formerly LitFunding Corp. (LFC) a California corporation. LFC became a subsidiary when the Articles of Merger between RP Acquisition Corp., the Registrant's wholly owned subsidiary that was formed to facilitate the merger, and LFC were filed with the Nevada Secretary of State. The charter documents of the Company are the charter documents of the surviving corporation. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, 7,592,250 shares of common stock were to be issued to the LFC shareholders in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of LFC common stock. LitFunding Corp, a California corporation changed its name to California LitFunding on May 30, 2003. RP Entertainment had no material operations, assets or liabilities prior to the merger.  As a result of the merger transaction with RP Entertainment, the former California LitFunding stockholders obtained control of the Company's voting stock. For financial accounting purposes, the acquisition was a reverse acquisition of the Company by California LitFunding, under the purchase method of accounting, and was treated as a recapitalization with California LitFunding as the acquirer. Accordingly, the historical financial statements have been restated after giving effect to the January 23, 2003, acquisition of the Company. The financial statements have been prepared to give retroactive effect to January 1, 2002, of the reverse acquisition completed on January 23, 2003, and represent the operations of California LitFunding. Consistent with reverse acquisition accounting: (i) all of California LitFunding's assets, liabilities, and accumulated deficit, are reflected at their combined historical cost (as the accounting acquirer) and (ii) the preexisting outstanding shares of the Company (the accounting acquiree) are reflected at their net asset value as if issued on January 23, 2003.  On April 2, 2003 certain individuals and entities filed an involuntary bankruptcy petition against the Company in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California. After numerous legal proceedings, in November 2003, the Company filed its voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. In January 2004, the Company's wholly owned operating subsidiary, California LitFunding, filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. The Company received confirmation of its plan of reorganization from the United States Bankruptcy Court on June 17th, 2004 (see Note 3).  As discussed in Note 2, the Company has entered into a Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization under the United States Bankruptcy Code. In June, 2006 the Company received its discharge from the Bankruptcy Court. Liabilities exceed  F-1    LitFunding Corp Notes  assets by $2,378,177 at December 31, 2006. The Company's net loss for the year ended December 31, 2006 is $1,027,947. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern remains dependent upon successful operation as it comes out from the bankruptcy plan, obtaining additional capital and financing, and generating positive cash flow from operations. The Company intends to seek additional capital either through debt or equity offerings and believes that increased volume and reduction in its lead time to finance and collect on funded cases will ultimately lead to profitability and positive cash flows. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  Cash and cash equivalents Cash includes all short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have original maturities of three months or less. At times cash deposits may exceed government insured limits. At December 31, 2006 there were no cash deposits that exceeded those insured limits.  Principles of consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, California LitFunding, LitFunding USA Easy Money Express, Inc., Global Universal Film Group, Inc. and its wholly owned LLC's and a dormant company, E. Evolution Expeditions whose name was changed to Silver Dollar Productions on January 21, 2005. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated.  Fixed Assets Fixed assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over a period of the shorter of the related applicable lease term or the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from 3 to 5 years. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $23,558 and $28,467, respectively.    Revenue recognition The Company recognizes revenues earned for the fees charged on the contingent advances upon successful resolution of the funded lawsuit. In accordance with the guidelines of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104 and Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts (SFAC) No. 5, upon successful resolution of the lawsuit, including appeals, the fees become realizable and earned. At this time the fee is determinable and the collection ensured. Fees are determined as set forth in the individual contracts. Fees are generally progressive the longer the time period for which the advances are outstanding. Fees are not earned until there is successful resolution to the related legal matter. The Company has begun to make contingent advances on so called post settlement lawsuit matters. In these instances all appeals have been exhausted and the fee is both determinable and collection ensured at the time the advances are made.  Income taxes The Company provides for income taxes based on the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which, among other things, requires that recognition of deferred income taxes be measured by the provisions of enacted tax laws in effect at the date of financial statements. The company is a cash basis taxpayer.  Financial Instruments Financial instruments consist primarily of cash, accounts receivable, contingent advances, and obligations under accounts payable, accrued expenses, debentures, notes payable and investor participation obligations. The carrying amounts of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. The carrying value of the Company's contingent advances approximate fair value because the Company provides allowances for any estimated uncollectible amounts. The carrying value of debentures and notes payable approximate fair value because they contain market value interest rates and have specified repayment terms. The participation obligations at December 31, 2006 are carried at the expected repayment amounts as determined by the individual notes.  The Company has applied certain assumptions in  F-2    LitFunding Corp Notes  estimating these fair values. The use of different assumptions or methodologies may have a material effect on the estimates of fair values.  Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates made in connection with the preparation of the accompanying financial statements include the carrying value of accounts receivable and contingent advances.  Stock-based compensation In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004). Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.  The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) as of December 31, 2005.   Stock issued for services totaled $414,353 and 1,288,678  for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.  In 2005, the Company accounted for its employee stock-based compensation arrangements in accordance with provision of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. As such, compensation expense under fixed plans is recorded only if the market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant exceeds the exercise price. The Company recognized compensation expense for stock options, common stock and other equity instruments issued to non-employees for services received based upon the fair value of the equity instruments issued as the services are provided and the securities earned.  The Company accounted for stock-based compensation associated with the re-pricing of employee stock options in accordance with the provision of FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation(FIN 44). For accounting purposes, the repricing of existing stock options requires variable accounting for the new options granted from the date of modification. Variable accounting requires that the intristic value, being the excess of the current market price at the end of each reporting period in excess of the exercise price of the repriced options, be expensed as non-cash stock-based compensation expense until such time as the repriced options are exercised, expire or are otherwise forfeited. Any increase in the intristic value of the repriced options will decrease reported earnings, and any subsequent decreases in value will increase reported earnings.  SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, requires the continued application of APB Opinion No. 25 for transactions with employees to provide pro forma net earnings (loss) and pro forma earnings (loss) per share disclosures for employee stock option grants as if the fair value based method defined in SFAS 123 has been applied to these transactions.  The following table represents the effect on net (loss) and (loss) per share if the Company had applied the fair value based method and recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123:  20062005Net (loss), as reported$(1,027,947))$(3,972,043)Add:   Employee stock-based compensation
Expense, as reported4,425825,154Deduct:  Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value method(4,425))(1,854,162)Pro forma net (loss)$(1,027,947))$(5,001,051)Net (loss) per common share  F-3    LitFunding Corp Notes   Basic (loss) per share, as reported$(0.05))$(0.28)Basic per share, pro forma$(0.05))$(0.35)  As required, the pro forma disclosures above include options granted during each fiscal year. Consequently, the effects of applying SFAS No. 123 for providing pro forma disclosures may not be representative of the effects on reported net income for future years until all options outstanding are included in the pro forma disclosures. Impairment of long-lived assets The Company assesses impairment of long-lived assets whenever there is an indication that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is determined by comparing the forecasted undiscounted cash flows generated by those assets to the assets' net carrying value. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is measured as the difference between the net book value of the assets and the estimated fair value of the related assets.  Net Loss Per Share Net loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.  Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (SFAS No. 154) which supersedes APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes and SFAS No. 3 Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for accounting for and reporting of changes in accounting principle. The statement requires the retroactive application to prior periods financial statements of changes in accounting principles, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 does not change the guidance for reporting the correction of an error in previously issued financial statements or the change in an accounting estimate. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not believe SFAS No. 154 will have a significant impact on its financial position or results of operations  Note 2 - Bankruptcy Petition and Reorganization  On April 2, 2003, certain creditors filed an involuntary bankruptcy petition under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code against LitFunding Corp, a Nevada corporation. In the Petition, the Petitioning Creditors alleged that LitFunding Corp was generally not paying its debts as they became due. The debtors disputed this allegation. For approximately eleven months the debtors and the petitioning creditors engaged in litigation regarding the merits of the involuntary petition, and the Petitioning Creditors rights under disputed contracts.  As a result of the foregoing litigation, LitFunding Corp was placed into a protective Chapter 11 proceeding effective November 19, 2003. The costs of litigating the merits of the involuntary petition, and the financial impact of the pending involuntary, so materially damaged both the LitFunding Corp and California LitFunding that it ultimately became necessary for both companies to enter into Chapter 11. Accordingly, California LitFunding entered into a Chapter 11 proceeding on January 26, 2004.  In February of 2004, this litigation was settled. The settlement reached by and among the Company and the petitioning creditors has been incorporated into a reorganization plan confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Courts on June 17th, 2004.  During 2004 and 2003, California LitFunding, as the operating entity, held title to substantially all of the assets of The Company. The core assets within California LitFunding, and those with most of the value, were the Settlement Agreements, which were the primary subject of the litigation indicated with the filing of the involuntary bankruptcy  F-4    LitFunding Corp Notes  petition on April 2, 2003. A total of approximately $18.6 million dollars was invested through those Settlement Agreements.  Pursuant to the plan of reorganization, LitFunding Corp and California LitFunding had the option to voluntarily transfer the control and the collection of the settlement agreements ("the Contract Pool") to an IEP distribution agent (the `Contract Agent') for the benefit of the IEP claimants who comprise class 6 under the terms of the reorganization plan.  LitFunding Corp, California LitFunding and the IEP claimants stipulated and agreed to do this in December 2004. In that stipulation, the Contract Agent would assume full control and administration over the `Contract Pool' and have full authority over the enforcement of the obligations set forth in the settlement agreements that comprise the Contract Pool.  Per the agreement signed on November 30th, 2004, LitFunding Corp and California LitFunding transferred all of the original records and files to the Contract Agent on December 16th, 2004, and sent written notice to all parties subject to the settlement agreement notifying them of the transfer of control of the Contract Pool and settlement agreements to the Contract Agent including the assignment of LitFunding Corp and California LitFunding's legal rights and that all payments are now payable to the Contract Agent.  As a result of the transfer, the Company was effectively relieved of the obligation due to the IEP claimants of IEP Note of approximately $26,662,000 including related accrued interest. The carrying value of receivables and advances at the time of the transfer was approximately $12,331,000 resulting in a gain on the transfer of $14,131,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. The original value of the IEP Note was determined based on the stipulations within the bankruptcy plan. In the transfer, the Company transferred all of its rights to the contingent advances and any potential earnings thereon. Because payments on the IEP Note were only to come from collections and earnings on the contingent advances, the Company is no longer responsible for that obligation.  In consideration for the cooperation and support provided by LitFunding Corp. and California LitFunding making the transition seamless and effective, the IEP claimants waived and released LitFunding Corp and California LitFunding from all liability arising under the "Contingent Recourse Note" of approximately $1,560,000, which would have become effective in 2005.  Moreover, by effecting this transfer of the Contract Pool, the two other classes of creditors (Class 4 and 5) affected by this transition will continue to receive the benefit of the unsecured creditors' allocation as defined in the plan of reorganization. The contingency administrative charge allowed by the plan of reorganization to be paid to LitFunding Corp and California LitFunding has ceased as a result of this transfer.   As a result of the transfer of the contract pool to the IEP claimants effective in December 2004, the Company recorded an extraordinary gain for the removal the associated obligation and assets.  The Company's primary liabilities are summarized in the following paragraphs:  A. Administrative and Priority Claims. The claims within this class total approximately $287,000 through December 31, 2005. Most of this amount represents the fees and costs payable to the Debtors general insolvency counsel, Winthrop Couchot, P.C. who accepted 200,000 shares of common stock from the company in April 2005 and an additional 100,000 shares in 2005 in part or full payment for the amount. The balance represents sums owed of approximately $9,300 in priority wages owed to two officers of the Debtors. These amounts are not subject to compromise and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheet at December 31, 2006. B. Gap Claims. During the period between the filing of the involuntary petition and the date on which LitFunding Nevada's stipulated to the entry of an order for relief, certain claims accrued. Substantially all of these claims accrued in favor of two law firms that were defending LitFunding Nevada against the involuntary filing. The Debtors reached an agreement with these claimants to pay $314,000 over twelve months.  The remaining balance owed at December 31, 2005 is approximately 40,557.  These amounts are subject to compromise and are included in trade and miscellaneous claims in the accompanying balance  F-5    LitFunding Corp Notes  sheet at December 31, 2005; During the three months ending March 31, 2006 the debtor elected to covert $3,676 to 26,250 shares of the Companies $0.001 par value common stock and  $36,881 to a promissory note bearing interest at 8 % per annum with a maturity date of August 1, 2006. The Company is in default on this note and owes $29,357 and accrued interest.  C. Debenture Claims. In calendar years 2002 and 2003 California LitFunding issued debentures to seven individuals, creating approximately two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) in debt obligations. Included is a $10,000 debenture payable to a related party. These claims are unsecured and they are undisputed. In November 2006 the Company won a Judgment against Alan Schuchman for fee owed, a stipulation in the Judgment was that Mr. Schuchman forfeits the $ 10,000 debenture he was holding. The balance of debentures at December 31,2006 is $190,000. The Company has not made the December 15, 2006 interest payment of $9,450.  D. Unsecured Claims Other Than Debenture Claims and IEP Claims. The Debtors have approximately $339,653 in allowed unsecured claims. These amounts are subject to compromise and are included in trade and miscellaneous claims in the accompanying balance sheet at December 31, 2005. During the months ended March 31, 2006 , the debtors elected to convert $244,169 to 1,454,108 shares of the Companies $0.001 par value common stock and $ 157,258 to notes payable with a maturity date of June 15, 2006. The remaining balance due as of December 31, 2006 is $89,798.  E. IEP Claims. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement entered into by and between The Company and the IEP petitioning creditors, each and every claim held by the IEP petitioning creditors has been fixed in them Plan. The totality of all claims held by the IEP petitioning creditors has been incorporated into the non-recourse Plan Note. The Plan Note had an opening balance of $26,111,763. This obligation was relieved in connection with the transfer of the Contract Pool to the IEP Creditors in December 31, 2004;  F. The Plan presented for confirmation incorporates both a business plan, and a legal framework for the payment of claims. The business plan sets forth how The Company intends to generate the funds necessary to meet the monetary obligations fixed in the Plan. The legal framework details what each class of creditors will receive under the terms of the Plan  G. The business plan incorporated into the Plan is designed to accomplish two core objectives. The first core objective is to maximize the funds collected to be collected. The second core objective is to essentially restart The Company's business model by raising and investing additional capital in new lawsuits;  H. Interest Holders. Interest holders are the parties who hold ownership interest (i.e., equity interest) in The Company. The Plan creates two classes of interests. Class 7, which is comprised of LitFunding Nevada, as the holder of all of the common stock of California LitFunding, and Class 8, which is comprised of all of the holders of common stock interests in LitFunding Nevada. These classes are not impaired under the terms of the Plan.   Note 3  Note Receivable  On October 16, 2006, the Company issued a demand promissory note in the amount of $174,000 bearing interest at 6% per annum to Global Universal Film Group Inc.. The principal and interest are due 180 days after the Spin-off transaction described in the Merger Agreement, if the Spin-off does not occur on or before June 30, 2007 no payment shall be due.  Note 4  Income taxes  The Company recognizes deferred income taxes for the difference between financial accounting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 consisted of the following:   F-6    LitFunding Corp Notes   As of December 31,20062005Current tax benefit (provision)$0$0Deferred (benefit) provision00Total income tax provision$0$0  Net deferred income tax assets of $,3,467,088 are fully offset by a valuation allowance of $3,467,088. The valuation allowance was increased by $370,088 in the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in the valuation allowance in the year ended December 31, 2005, primarily is the result of the increased of net operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2005.  Net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $10,197,319 expire from 2020 through 2025. Due to the change in control of the Company as discussed in Note 1, future utilization of net operating losses may be restricted.  The differences between the statutory and effective tax rates are as follows for the year ended December 31, 2005: December 31,20062005Federal statutory rates$(1,027,947)(34%)$(3,467,088)34%State income taxes00Valuation allowance for operating loss carryforwards(1,027,947)34%3,467,08834%Permanent difference for discharge of debt00%00%Other00%00%Effective rate$00%$-0-0%  Note 5 - Contingent Advances  Contingent advances occur when the Company enters into agreements with lawyers and law firms whereby the Company advances funds for litigation costs on selected cases. Generally, the Company will be repaid those amounts plus negotiated fees when and if a case is settled. These agreements are non-recourse but are secured by a lien against any awards in the case. Fees are generally based on the length of time the advances are outstanding. If the fee is less than the award or settlement, the fees are reduced to the amount of the recovery.  Management estimates the net realizable value of contingent advances by periodically reviewing the progress of the cases with the attorneys trying them and past experience with similar cases. Management believes that the Company has historically achieved a success rate of approximately 85% on cases that it has funded. Post reorganization procedures and policies have been implemented and management believes that it will achieve a success rate of no less than 90% on new fundings. Management monitors all cases and provides an allowance if it believes that any advances have been impaired. At December 31, 2006, there were contingent advances outstanding of $495,475 and a corresponding impairment allowance of $49,547.  Note 6 - Participation Agreements  Prior to the filing of the involuntary petition on April 2, 2003, the Company raised capital to enable it to engage in the practice of funding the contingent advances by entering into so called IEP agreements. These are considered to be investment/equity participation agreements the nature of which has been redefined and fixed as part of plan of reorganization and the totality of all claims held by the IEP petitioning creditors has been incorporated into the non-recourse Plan Note. The non-recourse Plan Note had an opening balance of $26,111,763 as of May 1, 2004 and as of May 1, 2004 included an approximate $2,000,000 from the cancelled sale of stock and a predetermined retroactive return. As discussed in note 3 above, the Contract Pool was transferred on December 16, 2004, to the Contract Manager designated by the IEP Claimants. Accordingly, this non-recourse plan note was removed from the balance  F-7    LitFunding Corp Notes  sheet at December 31, 2004, to reflect the economic reality of that transaction.  As of December 31, 2006, the Company had participation obligations of $724,500.  Note 7 - Debentures  During the years ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued 5-year 9% convertible debentures amounting to $200,000, due January 1, 2007. Included is one debenture due to a related party for $10,000. Interest is due semi-annually on the first day of June and December of each year, commencing June 1, 2003 until fully paid. As part of the plan of reorganization, these debentures have an amended maturity to 2008. At December 31, 2006, the Company had accrued interest totaling $9,750.  The registered holders of the debentures have the right, after one year prior to maturity, to convert the principal at the original conversion price of $10 for one Common share or at the adjusted conversion price. If and whenever on or after the date of this debenture, the Company issues or sells any share of common stock for a consideration per share less than the initial conversion rate, then upon such issue or sale, the initial conversion rate shall be reduced to the lowest net price per share at which such share of common stock have been issued. The debentures are subordinated to all the senior indebtedness, including debts under equity participation agreements.  Note 8- Debt In 2005, certain of the note holders elected to convert unsecured notes totaling $700,000 to 1,091,000 common shares.  At December 31, 2005 the Company has issued 600,000 shares and recorded subscription of $250,606 and were issued at September 30, 2006.  During the three months ended March 31, 2006, certain debtors in (note 2) above elected to convert $64,684 to promissory notes with a maturity date of June 15, 2006. These notes have been verbally extended.  Notes payable at  December 31, 2006 is comprised of the following:Note payable to entity, original balance of $19,181
Principal and interest due June 15, 2006. The Note is unsecured.$9,591Note payable to entity, original balance of $15,000 due in three monthly installments of $5,000 beginning April 15, 2006. The Note is unsecured10,000Note payable to entity, original balance of $30,502 due in two monthly installments of $15,251 beginning April 15, 2006. The Note is unsecured15,251Notes payable with no specified due dates.  Face amount of $19,500 and $15,000, interest at 10% per annum, the note is unsecured.34,500Notes payable with specified due dates.  Face amount $6,000, interest at 6% due March 15, 2006
Notes payable with varying due dates that have been verbally extended. Interest at 6% and 12%, face amounts totaling $62,500. Notes unsecured.6,000



62,500  F-8    LitFunding Corp Notes   Notes payable with specified due dates.  Face amount $6,000, interest at 12% due April 1, 2006. Note payable face amount $100,000, at 2% per month due Mayr 13, 2007. Note unsecured.25,000

100,000Notes payable with no specified due dates.   Notes unsecured908,964Total$1,171,806   During the year ended December 31, 2005, certain of the note holders elected to convert unsecured notes totaling $700,000 to 1,091,000 common shares.  At December 31, 2005 the Company has issued 600,000 shares and recorded subscription of $250,606   Note 9  Stockholders Equity Common Stock As discussed in Note 1, the Company entered into a merger agreement in January 2003, whereby 7,592,250 shares of its common stock were issued in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock of California LitFunding. The acquisition was a reverse acquisition of the Company by California LitFunding, under the purchase method of accounting, and was treated as a recapitalization with California LitFunding as the acquirer. Accordingly, the historical financial statements have been restated after giving effect to the January 23, 2003, acquisition of the Company.  In the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company declared and issued an 11 for 10 stock dividends. As a result 1,042,501 shares were issued. The trading value of the shares on the declaration date of November 1, 2004, was $0.70. The aggregate value of the new shares issued of $729,751 was reclassified from the accumulated deficit to additional paid-in capital.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company accepted a subscription to purchase 186,667 shares of its $.001 par value to an accredited investor at $0.41 per share.  The Company recorded a subscription payable of $76,533 at December 31, 2005; the shares were issued at September 30, 2006.  On March 21, 2006 the Company issued 250,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock to two accredited investors at $.20 per share for cash totaling $50,000.  During the three months ended March 31, 2006, certain consultants and debtors exercised their warrant rights to purchase 650,000 shares of the Companys par value common stock for cash totaling $4,250.  In March 2006, the Company issued 2,737,318 shares of its $.001 par value common stock for services valued at $271,426 the fair value of the underlying shares.  During the months ended March 31, 2006, certain unsecured creditors elected to convert $244,169 to 1,454,108 shares of the Companys $.001 par value common stock.  At March 31,  F-9    LitFunding Corp Notes  2006 the Company had issued 281,132 and the remaining1,172,976 shares were issued on April 18, 2006 the Company recorded a subscription payable of $ 190,687 at March 31, 2006  On April 18, 2006, the company issued 831,481 shares of its common stock to Morton Reed, CEO of the Company, in exchange for accrued debt valued at $130,000.  The shares were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed on February 28, 2006.  On April 18, 2006, the Company issued 50,000 shares of its restricted common stock to Anthony Longo as a sign-on bonus.  On April 18, 2006, the Company issued 15,000 shares of its restricted common stock to Rochester Capital Partners, LP and 5,000 shares of our common stock to Joseph Weaver in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Easy Money Express, Inc. (200,000 shares).  On April 18, 2006, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock to Marc Lieberman for services rendered to the Company.  The shares were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed with the SEC on February 28, 2006.  On April 18, 2006, the Company issued 10,700 shares of its common stock to Michael Marcelli for services rendered to the Company.  The shares were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed with the SEC on February 28, 2006.  On April 18, 2006, the Company issued 20,000 shares of its common stock to Kathleen Saur for services rendered to the Company.  The shares were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed with the SEC on February 28, 2006.  On April 18, 2006, the Company issued 163,295 shares of its common stock to Jon M. Leader for services rendered to the Company.  The shares were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed with the SEC on February 28, 2006.  On April 20, 2006, the Company issued 25,000 shares of its restricted common stock to Baldev Singh Grewal of Navin Enterprises, Inc. pursuant to its consulting agreement dated March 1, 2006.  On May 23, 2006, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to Stoecklein Law Group for services rendered to the Company.  On May 23, 2006, the Company issued 500,000 shares of its restricted common stock to Opus Pointe for services rendered to the Company.  On June 2, 2006, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock to Marc J. Winthrop for legal services provided to the Company.  The shares issued were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed with SEC on February 28, 2006.   F-10    LitFunding Corp Notes  Apex Investment Fund Ltd. converted 400,000 shares of Series A 12% Convertible Preferred Stock into 800,000 shares of our restricted common stock.  The 800,000 shares of common stock were issued on June 2, 2006.  On June 23, 2006, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to CLX & Associates, Inc. pursuant to its consulting agreement dated March 1, 2006.  On August 7, 2006, the Company issued 125,000 shares of restricted common stock to Howard Joffe for $10,000 cash.  On August 7, 2006, the Company issued 125,000 shares of restricted common stock to Robert Heitner for $10,000 cash.  On August 7, 2006 the Company issued 1,250,000 shares of restricted common stock to Morton Reed, CEO of the Company, in exchange for accrued debt valued at $250,000.  On August 14, 2006 the Company voided the 1,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock issued on June 23, 2006 to CLX & Associates, Inc pursuant to the cancellation agreement dated March 1, 2006.  On August 28, 2006, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to CLX & Associates, Inc. pursuant to its consulting agreement dated March 1, 2006 that was reinstated.  On August 28, 2006, the Company issued 1,600,000 shares of restricted common stocks to Imperial Capital Holdings LLC as follows; 96,000 shares for preferred shares dividend, 200,000 shares for the extension of the $30,000 note executed April 12, 2006 and 504,000 shares for inducement to execute an equity line of $3,000,000.  Imperial Capital Holdings LLC converted 400,000 shares of Series A 12% Convertible Preferred Stock into 800,000 shares of our restricted common stock.  The 800,000 shares of common stock were issued on August 28, 2006.  On August 28, 2006, the Company issued 2,780,000 shares of restricted common stock to Davric Corporation as follows; 14.666 shares for interest accrued on $200,000 note, 765,334 shares for cash and 2,000,000 in settlement of $200,000 note.  On October 4, 2006, the Company issued 900,000 shares of common stock to Hans George Huetter for consulting services rendered to the Company. The shares issued were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed with SEC on September 29, 2006.  On October 4, 2006, the Company issued 275,000 shares of common stock to Dennis H. Johnston for legal services rendered to the Company.  The shares issued were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed with SEC on September 29, 2006.   F-11    LitFunding Corp Notes  On November 17, 2006 the Company voided the 1,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock issued on August 28, 2006 to CLX & Associates, Inc pursuant to the cancellation agreement dated March 1, 2006.  On November 22, 2006, the Company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock to Gary Rasmussen for consulting services provided to the Company.  The shares issued were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed with SEC on September 29, 2006.  On December 6, 2006, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock to Charles Shamash for consulting services provided to the Company.  The shares issued were unrestricted pursuant to the S-8 Registration filed with SEC on September 29, 2006.  On December 11, 2006 the Company rescinded the issuance of 1,250,000 shares of restricted common stock to Morton Reed, CEO of the Company, in exchange for accrued debt valued at $125,000.     Common Stock As discussed in Note 1, the Company entered into a merger agreement in January 2003, whereby 7,592,250 shares of its common stock were issued in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock of California LitFunding. The acquisition was a reverse acquisition of the Company by California LitFunding, under the purchase method of accounting, and was treated as a recapitalization with California LitFunding as the acquirer. Accordingly, the historical financial statements have been restated after giving effect to the January 23, 2003, acquisition of the Company.  In the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company declared and issued an 11 for 10 stock dividend. As a result 1,042,501 shares were issued. The trading value of the shares on the declaration date of November 1, 2004, was $0.70. The aggregate value of the new shares issued of $729,751 was reclassified from the accumulated deficit to additional paid-in capital.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued 991,951 shares of its $.001 par value common stock for cash totaling $406,700.  Additionally, the Company issued 1,300,000 shares of its common stock to certain unrelated qualified investors in exchange for $533,000 of stock subscriptions. These subscriptions were due on or before December 31, 2005. The Company does not have reasonable expectation that these notes will be paid. At of December 31, 2005, $35,000 had been paid, and the Company wrote off $498,000 to bad debt.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued 757,500 shares for services valued at $416,462 the fair market value of the underlying shares.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued 157,888 shares in settlements valued at $67,394.   F-12    LitFunding Corp Notes  During the year ended December 31, 2005, certain of the note holders elected to convert their unsecured notes totaling $500,000 together with $38,750 in interest to 675,000 shares of common stock.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company allowed one of its officers to exercise the right to purchase 450,000 shares of common stock in exchange for a corresponding offset to the officer's deferred salary of $45,000.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, certain employees, consultants and debtors exercised their right to convert 665,000 warrants and options.  The Company received cash in the amount of $33,000.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company accepted a subscription to purchase 186,667 shares of its $.001 par value to an accredited investor at $0.41 per share.  The Company recorded a subscription payable of $76,533 at December 31, 2005.   Series A Preferred Stock On July 20 2005, the Board of Directors authorized the company to amend its Article of Incorporation to allow the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.  Further, the Board authorized the initial issuance of up to 2,000,000 shares of Series A 12% convertible preferred stock.  The Series A provides for a conversion rate 2 shares of common for 1 share of preferred, and such conversion rights shall commence six months from the date of purchase.  As of December 31, 2005, the company has issued 800,000 shares at $0.25 per share to two individual investors for cash totaling $200,000.  Series B Convertible Preferred Stock  Dividend Provisions.  The holders of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock will not be entitled to any dividends on the Preferred Stock.  Liquidation Preference.  In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, either voluntary or involuntary, subject to the rights of series of preferred stock that may from time to time come into existence, the holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, prior to and in preference to any distribution of any of the assets of the Company to the holders of Common Stock by reason of their ownership thereof, an amount per share equal to the sum of (i) $0.001 for each outstanding share of Series B Preferred Stock (Original Series B Issue Price) and (ii) an amount equal to the Original Series B Issue Price for each twelve (12) months that has passed since the date of issuance of any Series B Preferred Stock.  Spin-off Rights.  At the election of a majority in interest of the Series B Preferred Stock, Global Universal Film Group shall be spun off to the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock, with 90% of such shares in Global Universal Film Group being issued, pro rata to the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock, and 10% being issued and distributed to the shareholders of the Company Common Stock on a pro-rata basis.   F-13    LitFunding Corp Notes  Conversion.  Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock shall be convertible, at the election of the holder, into one (1) share of the Companys common stock on such date as the majority shareholders of all Series B have elected to effect the Spin-Off transaction; however, the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock shall automatically convert into shares of Common Stock of the Company after twelve (12) months from the date of LitFundings acquisition of Global Universal Film Group, regardless of whether or not an election has been made to spin-off Global Universal Film Group.  Voting Rights.  The shares of the Series B Preferred Stock shall not have any voting rights.  Pursuant to the reverse tri-party merger with Global Universal Film Group, Inc., we issued a total of 1,500,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock to the stockholders of Global.  The 1,500,000 shares are convertible into 1,500,000 shares of common stock.    Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies  Commitments In October 2004, the Company rescinded its long-term property lease as allowed in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings of the Federal Bankruptcy code and moved its offices to Las Vegas, Nevada where it occupied space on a month-to-month lease until March 1, 2005.  On March 1, 2005 the company entered into three-year lease agreement expiring February 29, 2008 at $5,000 per month in 2005, $6,000 per month in 2006 and $6,180 for the remaining lease year. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $78,837 and $127,310, respectively.  We currently maintain an executive office at 6375 S. Pecos Road, Suite 217, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120.  The space consists of approximately 1800 square feet.  The monthly rental for the space is $1,300 per month.    Contingencies The company is a defendant in several matters in litigation, many of which are in the normal course of business, including litigation for refunds of funds invested. The company believes these suits are without merit and intends to defend these litigations in courts of law.  The Company is involved in suits for breach of contract, fraud, conspiracy and defamation with the same claimants in the United States Bankruptcy Court and California State Court. The claimants allege that there was a finder's fee agreement between them and the founding officers / shareholders of the company. The Company's position is that there was a negotiated agreement with the claimants, which was complied with. The claimants allege damages of $16 million.  In May 2004, the United States Bankruptcy Court upheld the company's objections to all monetary claims. The claimants appealed this decision. Additionally, they filed an adversary proceeding raising most of the issues already raised in the first claims. In February 2005, the  F-14    LitFunding Corp Notes  United States Bankruptcy Court partially dismissed the claimant's adversary complaint and told the claimants to amend the complaint to give them the opportunity to clarify their claims. The claimants filed that amended complaint. In March 2005, the company filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice the entire amended complaint on the grounds that the claims therein were previously denied by the court in the bankruptcy proceeding. The State Court action has been stayed pending resolution of the issues in the United States Bankruptcy Court. The Federal Court's decisions in the company's favor will preclude proceedings against the company in the state court action.  Note 11- Net Income (Loss) Per Share  Net income per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Options/Warrants to purchase 6,250,750 to purchase common shares were not considered in the calculation for diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2005. In accordance with SFAS No. 128, the control number used in determining the dilutive effect of warrants and options is based on operating income, therefore, because the Company experienced a net operating loss as of December 31, 2005 the effect of their inclusion based would be anti-dilutive and hence, were not included.  20062005Income (Loss)SharesPer ShareIncome (Loss)SharesPer ShareNet  income (loss) before extraordinary item$      (1,027,947)$    (3,970,798)Extraordinary item-Total$      (1,027,947)(3,970,798)Preferred dividends19,9931,245Income (loss) available to common shares holders$      (1,047,940)$     (3,972,043Basic earnings (loss) Per Share:Before extraordinary item$      (1,047,940)19,099,652$     (0.05)$    (3,972,043)14,419,498$
(0.28)Extraordinary item-19,099,652$     (0.05)14,419,498$    (0.28)Total$      (1,047,940)19,099,652$     (0.05)$  (3,972,498)14,419,498$    (0.28)  Note 12  Related Party  During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with a non-independent Board member to lease office space on a month-to-month basis. Rent expense recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2005 related to this agreement was $13,957. This lease was terminated in March 2005. In addition, this same Board member has a $10,000 debenture with the Company as described in Note 6.  In March 2005, the Company granted Robert Amira, our Executive Vice President, 10,000 shares of common stock and 10,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.97 per share, We also granted Dermot Ryan 10,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock at $0.97 per share. Mr. Ryan is one of our employees, and was appointed as our Corporate Secretary in June 2005.  In June 2005, we granted Lloyd Schiller, our Vice President for Sales, 10,000 shares of our common stock along with options to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock at $0.56 per share.  F-15    LitFunding Corp Notes   In July 2005, we granted Terry Gabby, our Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, 10,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock at $0.41 per share. Mr. Hejmanowski, our director, was granted 150,000 shares of our common stock as a signing bonus in July 2005.  In August 2005, we granted Dermot Ryan additional options to purchase 10,000 shares at $0.41 per share.  In September 2005, the company granted options to Morton Reed to purchase 500,000 shares at $0.99 per share, and granted options to Stanley Weiner to purchase 300,000 shares at $0.99 per share.  On November 2, 2005 we issued 150,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock to Donald Hejmanowski valued at $72,000, for Director services which the Company expensed as share-based expense at December 31, 2005.  Note 13  Warrants and Options  During 2005, the Company granted options and warrants to purchase 3,773,250 shares of its common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $0.49 per share.  On January 5, 2006, we granted 300,000 options to purchase shares of our common stock at $0.15 per share to Baldev Singh Grewal for services rendered to the Company.  The options are exercisable for one year.  On March 15, 2006, we issued a two (2) year warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock at $0.25 per share to David Ciolino for services rendered to the Company.  We granted the CFO of the Company Terry Gabby 50,000 options in November 2006, exercisable at $0.04 per share and expiring on November 21, 2009. We granted Terry Gabby 50,000 warrants in November 2006, exercisable at $0.04 per share and expiring on November 27, 2009.  We believe that the issuance and grant of the warrants and options was exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) and Regulation D Rule 506.  The shares issued were directly from us and did not involve a public offering or general solicitation.  The recipients of the shares were afforded an opportunity for effective access to files and records of the Company that contained the relevant information needed to make their investment decision, including the financial statements and 34 Act reports.  We reasonably believed that the recipients, immediately prior to issuing the shares, had such knowledge and experience in our financial and business matters that they were capable of evaluating the merits and risks of their investment.  The recipients had the opportunity to speak with our management on several occasions prior to their investment decision.     Options and Warrants Exercised During the year ended December 31, 2005, 1,115,000 options were exercised. The warrants and options were issued to both non-employees for services and to Directors of the Company and creditors. The  and options issued to Directors of the Company were part of the compensation package promised to Directors in August 2004 and are priced accordingly.  The summary of activity for the Company's stock options/warrants is presented below:   F-16    LitFunding Corp Notes   Year ended
December, 2006Weighted Average
Exercise PriceYear ended
December, 2005Weighted Average
Exercise PriceOptions/Warrants  outstanding at beginning of Period6,250,750$0.303,592,500$0.30Granted160,000$0.093,773,250$0.49Exercised(400,000)$0.01(1,115,000)$0.05Terminated/Expired--Options /warrants outstanding at end of period6,010750$0.426,250,750$0.42Options/warrants exercisable at end of period6.010,750$0.426,250,750$0.42Price per share of options outstanding$0.01-$7.00$0.01-$7.00Weighted average remaining contractual lives2.08 years3.08 yearsWeighted average fair value of options granted during the period$0.49$0.49  Note 14 - Subsequent Events   On March 5, 2007, we agreed to issue 40 million shares to Rochester Capital Partners, LP. (RCP), a Nevada limited partnership. Gary Rasmussen is the General Partner of this partnership and exercised dispositive control of all shares owned by it.  Upon execution of the agreement with RCP, PCP assigned its interest in 21 million shares to Lehars Handels Ges., M.b.h., leaving RCP with 19 million shares.  In March, 2007, we issued 8,000,000 shares to Morton Reed, our Chief Executive Officer, in exchange for $350,000 in back salary. Pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement with RCP, Dr. Reed immediately sold these shares to RCP.  We believe that the issuance and sale of the restricted shares was exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) and Regulation D promulgated thereunder.  The shares issued were directly from us and did not involve a public offering or general solicitation.  The recipients of the shares were afforded an opportunity for effective access to files and records of the Company that contained the relevant information needed to make their investment decision, including the financial statements and 34 Act reports.  We reasonably believed that the recipients, immediately prior to issuing the shares, had such knowledge and experience in our financial and business matters that they were capable of evaluating the merits and risks of their investment.  The recipients had the opportunity to speak with our management on several occasions prior to their investment decision  On March 5, 2007, we entered into a binding Letter Agreement with Rochester Capital Partners, LP., a Nevada limited partnership (RCP) and agreed to issue a total of forty (40) million shares of treasury stock in exchange for $250,000, payable by a promissory note due and payable in full within sixty days. As of the date of this prospectus, RCP has advanced approximately $50,000. In addition to the $250,000, the RCP has agreed to purchase up to 11 million shares from Morton Reed, our  F-17    LitFunding Corp Notes  Chief Executive Officer, and to provide additional funding of up to $180,000, for which it may acquire up to an additional 5 million shares of common stock. The Transaction was unanimously approved by our Board of Directors at a meeting held on February 22, 2007.  At closing, RCP immediately assigned its interest in 21 million shares to Lehars Handels Ges., M.b.H. (Lehars), for consideration of $300,000 to be received within 30 days. Lehars has failed to remit payment and, if the default continues, the shares will revert to RCP.  RCP currently owns approximately 30 million shares of our common stock, or about 39%. However, if the 21 million shares revert back to RCP, it will own approximately 51 million shares of our outstanding common stock, or about 65%.  RCP is a limited partnership controlled by Gary Rasmussen as its General Partner. The limited partners of RCP are family members of Mr. Rasmussen. Gary Rasmussen is a consultant to the Registrant and will continue as such after the Transaction.  All references to said Letter Agreement herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the actual Letter Agreement, a copy of which was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to a Form 8-K filed by LitFunding on March 7, 2007.  F-18