alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General
Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2016 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures Inc.





|Date: April 5, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                    |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
Case 1:20-mj-02708-AOR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2020 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:20-mj-02708-AOR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2020 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:20-mj-02708-AOR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2020 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:20-mj-02708-AOR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2020 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:20-mj-02708-AOR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2020 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:20-mj-02708-AOR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2020 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:20-mj-02708-AOR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2020 Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT 12COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES





Six Months Ended June
30,


Year Ended2002


2001


2001


2000


1999


1998


1997(In thousands, except ratio data)Income (loss) before income taxes, equity in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates and extraordinary item

541,161


(600,214
)

(1,259,390
)

688,384


220,213


117,922


104,077Dividends and other received from nonconsolidated affiliates

1,599


4,332


7,426


4,934


7,079


9,168


4,624Total

542,760


(595,882
)

(1,251,964
)

693,318


227,292


127,090


108,701Fixed Charges:Interest expense

218,717


293,939


575,057


413,425


192,321


135,766


75,076Amortization of loan fees

6,513


7,538


14,648


12,401


1,970


2,220


1,451Interest portion of rentals

139,069


86,395


233,353


150,317


24,511


16,044


6,120Total fixed charges

364,299


387,872


823,058


576,143


218,802


154,030


82,647Preferred stock dividends:Tax effect of preferred dividends



















After tax preferred dividends



















Total fixed charges and preferred dividends

364,299


387,872


823,058


576,143


218,802


154,030


82,647Total earnings available for payment of fixed charges

907,059


(208,010
)

(428,906
)

1,269,461


446,094


281,120


191,348Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

2.49


(.54
)

(.52
)

2.20


2.04


1.83


2.32Rental fees and charges

397,339


246,843


666,724


429,476


306,393


200,550


76,500Interest rate

35
%

35
%

35
%

35
%

8
%

8
%

8
%
#### § 3862.8-1 Land descriptions in patents.

The land description in a patent for a lode mining claim, for a millsite, or for a placer claim not consisting of legal subdivisions, shall hereafter consist of the names and survey numbers of the claims being patented and those being excluded, or of the names of the excluded claims if they are unsurveyed, or of the legal subdivisions of excluded land covered by homestead or other nonmineral entry. The land description shall refer to the field notes of survey and the plat thereof for a more particular description and the patent shall expressly make them a part thereof. Where shown by the mineral entry the patent shall give the actual or approximate legal subdivision, section, township and range, the name of the county and of the mining district, if any, wherein the claims are situated. A copy of the plat and field notes of each mineral survey patented will be furnished to the patentee.
#### Jules Chopak, Respondent, v. William H. Walker, Appellant.

In our opinion the trial court unduly limited appellant’s cross-examination with respect to the circumstances surrounding respondent’s retainer by appellant and as to the circumstances surrounding disciplinary action referred to in respondent’s testimony. Such evidence, if adduced, might have thrown additional light on the facts to be considered in appraising the value of respondent’s services. Rolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 781.]
DEPIOFTRANSPOeWION 

DOCKEIS 

.^. ]' : !!."! 

OST-2010-0046 

USDOT Secretary 

Dear Sir: 

Keep Mercer county in Mountain Time. Let us vote for Mountain Time. 

Let us vote, it is our right. Vote this fall in the general election. 

Rural Resident 

Mercer County
§ 3481.2 Procedures and public participation. ( a ) *Written findings.* All major decisions and determinations of the State Director and District Manager shall be in writing; shall set forth with reasonable detail the facts and rationale upon which such decisions or determinations are based; and shall be available for public inspection, pursuant to § 3481.3 of this title, during normal business hours at the appropriate office.
( b ) *Logical mining units (LMU's)* — ( 1 ) *Availability of LMU proposals.* Applications for the approval of an LMU or modification thereto submitted under § 3487.1 of this title, or a proposal by the authorized officer to establish an LMU, shall be available for public inspection, pursuant to § 3481.3 of this title, in the office of the authorized officer. A notice of the availability of any proposed LMU or modification thereto shall be prepared immediately by the authorized officer, promptly posted at his office, and mailed to the surface and coal owners, if other than the United States; appropriate State and Federal Agencies; and the clerk or other appropriate officer of the county in which the proposed LMU is located. The notice will be posted or published in accordance with the procedures of such offices. The notice shall be submitted by the authorized officer to a local newspaper of general circulation in the locality of the proposed LMU for publication at least once a week for 2 weeks consecutively.
( 2 ) *Notice of proposed decision.* Prior to the final approval or establishment of any LMU, the authorized officer shall have the proposed decision published in a local newspaper of general circulation in the locality of the proposed LMU at least once a week for 2 weeks consecutively and shall not approve the application for at least 30 days after the first publication of the proposed decision. Such notice may be published concurrently with the notice of availability.
( 3 ) *Public participation.* A public hearing shall be conducted upon the receipt by the authorized officer of a written request for a hearing from any person having a direct interest which is or may be affected adversely by approval of the proposed LMU, provided that the written request is received within 30 days after the first publication of the notice of proposed decision in a newspaper of general circulation in the locality of the proposed LMU. A complete transcript of any such public hearing, including any written comments submitted for the record, shall be kept and made available to the public during normal business hours at the office of the authorized officer that held the hearing, and shall be furnished at cost to any interested party. In making any decision or taking any action subsequent to such public hearing, the authorized officer shall take into account all testimony presented at the public hearing.
§ 3838.11 How do I locate and record mining claims or tunnel sites on SRHA lands? ( a ) You must— ( 1 ) Submit a notice of intent to locate mining claims form (NOITL), which you may obtain from BLM, with the proper BLM State Office and submit a non-refundable service charge for processing the NOITL (see the table of fees in § 3830.21 of this chapter);
( 2 ) Serve a copy of the NOITL on the surface owner(s) of record, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested; and
( 3 ) Submit proof to BLM that you served a copy of the NOITL on the surface owner(s) to complete submission of a NOITL with BLM.
( b ) You can submit the NOITL to BLM and serve a copy of the NOITL on the surface owner(s) at the same time.
( c ) If you want to explore parcels of land that are owned by different people, you must submit a separate NOITL for each parcel of land.
( d ) You must— ( 1 ) Wait 30 days after you serve the surface owner(s) with the NOITL before entering the lands to explore for minerals or locate a mining claim or tunnel site; and
( 2 ) Follow procedures for locating mining claims and tunnel sites in part 3832, recording mining claim and tunnel sites in part 3833, and annual maintenance of mining claims in parts 3834 and 3835 of this chapter.
§ 3932.40 Readjustment of lease terms. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all leases are subject to readjustment of lease terms, conditions, and stipulations at the end of the first 20-year period (the primary term of the lease) and at the end of each 10-year period thereafter.
( b ) Royalty rates will be subject to readjustment at the end of the primary term and every 20 years thereafter.
( c ) At least 30 days prior to the expiration of the readjustment period, the BLM will notify the lessee by written decision if any readjustment is to be made and of the proposed readjusted lease terms, including any revised royalty rate.
( d ) Readjustments may be appealed. In the case of an appeal, unless the readjustment is stayed by the IBLA or the courts, the lessee must comply with the revised lease terms, including any revised royalty rate, pending the outcome of the appeal.
§ 3503.25 When may BLM issue permits and leases for Federal minerals underlying private surface? ( a ) The regulations in this part apply where the United States disposed of certain lands and those disposals reserved to the United States the right to prospect for, mine, and remove the minerals under applicable leasing laws and regulations.
( b ) If the Federal Government acquires minerals through a deed, BLM will follow any special covenants in the deed relating to leasing or permitting.
§ 679.390 How does the Local Workforce Development Board meet its requirement to conduct business in an open manner under the “sunshine provision” of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act? The Local WDB must conduct its business in an open manner as required by WIOA sec. 107(e), by making available to the public, on a regular basis through electronic means and open meetings, information about the activities of the Local WDB. This includes: ( a ) Information about the Local Plan, or modification to the Local Plan, before submission of the plan;
( b ) List and affiliation of Local WDB members;
( c ) Selection of one-stop operators;
( d ) Award of grants or contracts to eligible training providers of workforce investment activities including providers of youth workforce investment activities;
( e ) Minutes of formal meetings of the Local WDB; and
( f ) Local WDB by-laws, consistent with § 679.310(g).
### §4041. Purposes

The purposes of this subchapter are—

(1) to provide for more effective management of, and accountability for the proper discharge of, the Secretary's trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and individual Indians by establishing in the Department of the Interior an Office of Special Trustee for American Indians to oversee and coordinate reforms within the Department of practices relating to the management and discharge of such responsibilities;

(2) to ensure that reform of such practices in the Department is carried out in a unified manner and that reforms of the policies, practices, procedures and systems of the Bureau, Minerals Management Service, and Bureau of Land Management, which carry out such trust responsibilities, are effective, consistent, and integrated; and

(3) to ensure the implementation of all reforms necessary for the proper discharge of the Secretary's trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and individual Indians.

(Pub. L. 103–412, title III, §301, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4244.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

The Minerals Management Service was abolished and functions divided among the Office of Natural Resources Revenue, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement. See Secretary of the Interior Orders No. 3299 of May 19, 2010, and No. 3302 of June 18, 2010, and chapters II, V, and XII of title 30, Code of Federal Regulations, as revised by final rules of the Department of the Interior at 75 F.R. 61051 and 76 F.R. 64432.
### **Subchapter C—Treatment of Partnerships**

Part
I.
In general.
II.
Partnership adjustments.
III.
Procedure.
IV.
Definitions and special rules.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter C, added Pub. L. 97–248, title IV, §402(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 648, consisting of sections 6221 to 6234, related to tax treatment of partnership items, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–74, title XI, §1101(a), (g), Nov. 2, 2015, 129 Stat. 625, 638, applicable to returns filed for partnership taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, with certain exceptions.
(No. 74-CC-448

#### South Elgin Manor, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 8, 1974.*

South Elgin Manor, Claimant, pro se.

*272William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §201. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3379

Section, R.S. §4844; act July 1, 1916, ch. 209, 39 Stat. 309, provided for admission of indigent insane persons of the District of Columbia.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Robert L. Gerry, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated:August 11, 2008
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General
Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures Inc.





|Date: March 28, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|-------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                     |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-21839-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN

DESTINY SHELTON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

11USA GROUP, LLC, a Florida Limited 

Liability Corporation doing business as

E11EVEN, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS MATTER is before me upon U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman’s

Report and Recommendations (“Report”) (ECF No. 40) on Defendants’ Motion to Compel 

Arbitration, to Stay Proceedings and to Dismiss Claims of Opt-In Plaintiffs. (ECF No. 15)

and Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Proceedings Pending 

Arbitration (ECF No. 30) (collectively, the “Motions”), issued November 20, 2020. The 

Court referred the Defendant’s Motions to Judge Goodman pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(A). See ECF No. 32. 

Judge Goodman recommends the Court compel arbitration of the claims brought by 

Destiny Shelton, Myah Knighton-Black, Naomi Smith, and Celina Konegan, and stay this 

case with respect to those specific Plaintiffs.1 Additionally, Judge Goodman recommends 

that Judge Cooke deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss the claims of the Opt-In Plaintiffs at 

this stage in the case. No party has objected to Judge Goodman’s Report, and the time to 

do so has passed. After reviewing the Motions, Judge Goodman’s Report, and the relevant 

legal authorities, the Court finds Judge Goodman’s Report clear, cogent, and compelling. 

1

Judge Goodman also recommended the Court deny without prejudice the motion to 

compel arbitration against Opt-In Plaintiff Danielle Cruz. However, after Judge Goodman 

issued the Report, Danielle Cruz voluntarily dismissed her claims against Defendants. ECF 

No. 42. Accordingly, the Defendants’ Motion to Compel as to Ms. Cruz is moot.

Case 1:20-cv-21839-MGC Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Accordingly, Judge Goodman’s Report (ECF No. 40) is AFFIRMED and 

ADOPTED as an Order of this Court. It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as 

follows:

1. The Court GRANTS in part Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration, to Stay 

Proceedings and to Dismiss Claims of Opt-In Plaintiffs. (ECF No. 15) and 

Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Proceedings Pending 

Arbitration (ECF No. 30);

2. The Court compels arbitration of the claims brought by Destiny Shelton, Myah 

Knighton-Black, Naomi Smith, and Celina Konegan;

3. This case is STAYED pending arbitration;

4. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case; and

5. The parties shall file a joint status report in 90 days. Within (7) days of the 

completion of arbitration, the parties shall file a motion to reopen this case.

DONE and ORDERED in chambers, at Miami, Florida, this 11th day of December 

2020.

Copies furnished to:

Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-21839-MGC Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2020 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.11





 Exhibit 10.11 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO HUB REFINED PRODUCTS AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to the HUB REFINED PRODUCTS AGREEMENT (hereinafter “Amendment No. 1”) is entered into as of the 18th day of November,
2020 (hereinafter “Effective Date”) between Traxys North America LLC (“Traxys”), a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of Delaware, and Li-Cycle Corp., (“Li-Cycle”) an Ontario, Canada Corporation. 
 WHEREAS, Li-Cycle and
Traxys are parties to the Hub Refined Products Agreement dated September 24, 2020; and 
 WHEREAS, Li-Cycle and
Traxys have agreed to amend the Hub Refined Products Agreement to update the basic terms of its Duration in Article 2.3. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties
hereto, in consideration of the covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 
  

	 	A.	 The original Article 2.3 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following new terms:



 “Unless otherwise mutually agreed, this agreement shall terminate unless at least one of the following conditions
is met: 
  

	 	1.	 Li-Cycle becomes a publicly traded company by December 31, 2021.



  

	 	2.	 Li-Cycle, or any of its subsidiaries, affiliates or related companies,
secures committed capital of at least USD 125mm in debt or equity or otherwise, by December 31, 2021. 


  

	 	3.	 Li Cycle has committed sales agreements for at least 25% of the Rochester Hub’s expected output during the
Hub’s first year of commercial production of either Li Carbonate or Ni Sulfate or Co Sulfate. 


 Should none of the
preceding three conditions be met, prior to termination of this marketing agreement, Buyer and Seller shall endeavour to enter into another contract with similar terms to the ones contained herein and grants Traxys exclusivity through July 31st 2022 (the “Exclusivity Period”). During the Exclusivity Period, Li-Cycle shall not enter into parallel discussions or negotiations with regards to
the subject matters of this Agreement with any other commodities merchants or trading firms or customers.” 
  

	 	B.	 Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect and unchanged. 














 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No.1 under the hands of their
proper officers duly authorized in that behalf. 
  

			
	Li-Cycle Corp.
		
	By:	 	          

	Name:	 	Ajay Kochhar
	Title:	 	President and CEO
	Date:	 	November 18th, 2020

  

			
	TRAXYS NORTH AMERICA LLC
		
	By:	 	          

	Name:	 	Kevin P. Smith
	Title:	 	MD
	Date:	 	November 19, 2020
EXHIBIT 11 – COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE           Three Months Ended March 31, *(In thousands, except per share data)* 2007  2006 Basic Numerator:        Income before discontinued operations $99,213  $97,063 Income (loss) from discontinued operations,net  3,009   (249)       Net income $102,222  $96,814          Diluted Numerator:        Numerator for income before discontinuedoperations — diluted $99,213  $97,063 Numerator for discontinued operations, net —diluted  3,009   (249)       Net income — diluted $102,222  $96,814          Denominator:        Weighted average common shares — basic  493,843   518,139          Effect of dilutive securities:        Stock options and restricted stock  1,025   677        Denominator for net income per common share -diluted  494,868   518,816          Net income (loss) per common share:        Income before discontinued operations — basic $.20  $.19 Loss from discontinued operations, net — basic  .01   (.00)       Basic $.21  $.19                 Income before discontinued operations —diluted $.20  $.19 Loss from discontinued operations, net —diluted  .01   (.00)       Diluted $.21  $.19
### §3128. Short title

This chapter may be cited as the "Federal Insurance Contributions Act."

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 429, §3125; renumbered §3126, Pub. L. 86–778, title I, §103(q)(1), Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 939; renumbered §3127, Pub. L. 99–509, title IX, §9002(a)(1), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1970; renumbered §3128, Pub. L. 100–647, title VIII, §8007(a)(1), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3781.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–509, except as otherwise provided, effective with respect to payments due with respect to wages paid after Dec. 31, 1986, including wages paid after such date by a State (or political subdivision thereof) that modified its agreement pursuant to section 418(e)(2) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, see section 9002(d) of Pub. L. 99–509, set out as a note under section 418 of Title 42.
Sacramento

River

CCOOLLUUSSAA CCOO

106.0 R

1

6

7

36 31

2

12

35

11

T17N R2W

T18N R2W

T17N R1W

T18N R1W

Stegeman

Contract No. 14-06-200-5210A-R-1

Exhibit B

Green Valley Corporation

725-202-59

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 8, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\green_valley_corporation_5210\green_valley_corporation.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion