alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of MeriStar Hospitality
Operating Partnership, L.P., MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp., MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II and MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III (the Registrants) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrants.



|                     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2006 |  | /S/    DONALD D.
OLINGER                                                                                                                                                                                  
|                     |  | Donald D. Olinger Chief Financial Officer MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III
5)

(All Programs)

COMPLIANCE WITH CWIL RIGHTS LAWS AND REGULATIONS

(a) The Contractor shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of

1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (P.L 93-112, as

amended), the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101, et seq.) and any other

applicable civil rights laws, as well as with theirrespective implementing regulations and

guidelines imposed by the U.S. Department of the Interior and/or Bureau of

Reclamation.

(b) These statutes require that no person in the United States shall, on the

grounds ofrace, color, national origin, handicap, or age, be excluded from participation

in, be denied the benefits of~ or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any

program or activity receiving financial assistance from the Bureau of Reclamation. By

executing this contract, the Contractor agrees to immediately take any measures

necessary t6 implement this obligation, including permitting officials of the United States

to inspect premises, programs, and documents.

(c) The Contractor makes this agreement in consideration of and for the

purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loans, contracts, property discounts or

other Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the Contractor by the

Bureau of Reclamation, including installment payments after such date on account of

arrangements for Federal financial assistance which were approved before such date.

The Contractor recognizes and agrees that such Federal assistance will be extended in

reliance on the representations and agreements made in this article, and that the United

States reserves the right to seek judicial enforcement thereof.

Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964 Article Approved 2/22/71; Revised and renamed

11/84

This article need not be used ifthe Contract is the actual water user. The article

is based on 43 CER 17, Subparts A, B and C.

M.8
### **CHAPTER 76—JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS**

Subchapter
Sec. 1
A.
Civil actions by the United States
7401

B.
Proceedings by Taxpayers and Third Parties
7421
C.
The Tax Court
7441
D.
Court review of Tax Court decisions
7481
E.
Burden of proof
7491

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1998**—Pub. L. 105–206, title III, §3001(b), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 727, added item for subchapter E.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1952(n)(4)(B), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1846, struck out item for subchapter E "Miscellaneous provisions".

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–719, title I, §110(d)(3), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1145, substituted "Taxpayers and Third Parties" for "taxpayers" in item for subchapter B.

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe Effect of Sliding Speed on Film Thickness and Pressure Supporting Ability of a Point Contact Under Zero Entrainment Velocity ConditionsA unique tribometer is used to study film forming and pressure supporting abilities of point contacts at zero entrainment velocity (ZEV). Film thickness is determined using a capacitance technique, verified through comparisons of experimental results and theoretical elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) predictions for rolling contacts. Experiments are conducted using through hardened AISI 52 100 steel balls, Polyalphaolefin (PAO) 182 and Pentaerythritol Tetraheptanoate (PT) lubricants, and sliding speeds between 2.0 to 12.0 m/s. PAO 182 and PT are found to support pressures up to 1. 1 GPa and 0.67 GPa respectively. Protective lubricant films ranging in thickness between 90 to 2 10 nm for PAO 182 and 220 to 340 nm for PT are formed. Lubricants experience shear stresses between 14 to 22 MPa for PAO 182 and 7 to 16 MPa for PT at shear rates of 10(exp 7)/sec. The lubricant's pressure supporting ability most likely results from the combination of immobile films and its transition to a glassy solid at high pressures.Document ID20010016781Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsThompson, Peter M.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Jones, William R., Jr.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Jansen, Mark J.*(AYT Corp. Brook Park, OH United States)*Prahl, Joseph M.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 2000Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-12531NASA/TM-2000-210566NAS 1.15:210566Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 274-00-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010016781.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Bridget Grady, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings county unanimously affirmed, with costs. A passenger leaving a street car at the Borough Hall loop to cross the street to the sidewalk, who is invited to come across by the officer of the traffic squad on duty, is not to be held guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law if run over by an approaching vehicle which the traffic officer failed to stop. In such case it is a question of fact for the jury whether the conduct of the pedestrian is that of a reasonably prudent person, in view of all the circumstances. The weight of the evidence and the condition at this place of dense traffic justify the finding of negligence in the driving and management of the defendant’s horse and wagon in colliding with the plaintiff. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
##### 



COOPER INDUSTRIES, LTD.
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Year Ended December 31,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Interest Expense
    
    $
    51,500
    
    
    $
    64,800
    
    
    $
    68,100
    
    
    $
    74,100
    
    
    $
    74,500Estimated Interest Portion of Rent Expense
    
    
    10,168
    
    
    
    10,583
    
    
    
    11,666
    
    
    
    12,183
    
    
    
    14,679Fixed Charges
    
    $
    61,668
    
    
    $
    75,383
    
    
    $
    79,766
    
    
    $
    86,283
    
    
    $
    89,179Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes
    
    $
    647,700
    
    
    $
    495,000
    
    
    $
    428,500
    
    
    $
    346,500
    
    
    $
    280,200Add:    Fixed Charges
    
    
    61,668
    
    
    
    75,383
    
    
    
    79,766
    
    
    
    86,283
    
    
    
    89,179Less:    Equity in Earnings of
50% or Less Owned Companies
    
    
    (724
    )
    
    
    (1,328
    )
    
    
    (2,903
    )
    
    
    (2,534
    )
    
    
    (2,969
    )Earnings Before Fixed Charges
    
    $
    708,644
    
    
    $
    569,055
    
    
    $
    505,363
    
    
    $
    430,249
    
    
    $
    366,410Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    11.5x
    
    
    
    7.5x
    
    
    
    6.3x
    
    
    
    5.0x
    
    
    
    4.1x
#### § 3802.4 General provisions.
§ 3930.20 Operations. ( a ) *Maximum Economic Recovery (MER).* All mining and in situ development and production operations must be conducted in a manner to yield the MER of the oil shale deposits, consistent with the protection and use of other natural resources, the protection and preservation of the environment, including, land, water, and air, and with due regard for the safety of miners and the public. All shafts, main exits, and passageways, and overlying beds or mineral deposits that at a future date may be of economic importance must be protected by adequate pillars in the deposit being worked or by such other means as the BLM approves.
( b ) *New geologic information.* The operator must record any new geologic information obtained during mining or in situ development operations regarding any mineral deposits on the lease. The operator must report this new information in a BLM-approved format to the proper BLM office within 90 calendar days after obtaining the information.
( c ) *Statutory compliance.* Operators must comply with applicable Federal and state law, including, but not limited to the following: ( 1 ) Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857 *et seq.*);
( 2 ) Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (30 U.S.C. 1151 *et seq.*);
( 3 ) Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 *et seq.*);
( 4 ) National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 *et seq.*);
( 5 ) Archaeological and Historical Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 469 *et seq.*);
( 6 ) Archaeological Resources Protection Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470aa *et seq.*); and
( 7 ) Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, as amended (25 U.S.C. 3001 *et seq.*).
( d ) Resource protection. The following additional resource protection provisions apply to oil shale operations: ( 1 ) Operators must comply with applicable Federal and state standards for the disposal and treatment of solid wastes. All garbage, refuse, or waste must either be removed from the affected lands' or disposed of or treated to minimize, so far as is practicable, their impact on the lands, water, air, and biological resources;
( 2 ) Operators must conduct operations in a manner to prevent adverse impacts to threatened or endangered species and any of their habitat that may be affected by operations.
( 3 ) If the operator encounters any scientifically important paleontological remains or any historical or archaeological site, structure, building, or object on Federal lands, it must immediately notify the BLM. Operators must not, without prior BLM approval, knowingly disturb, alter, damage, or destroy any scientifically important paleontological remains or any historical or archaeological site, structure, building, or object on Federal lands.
§ 3506.13 What information must I provide to BLM to include in the notice of exploration? You must include: ( a ) Your name and address;
( b ) A description of the lands;
( c ) The address of the BLM office where your exploration plan will be available for inspection; and
( d ) An invitation to the public to participate in the exploration under the license.
#### § 4.1281 Who may appeal.

Any person who is or may be adversely affected by a written decision of the Director of OSM or his delegate may appeal to the Board where the decision specifically grants such right of appeal.
§ 3836.12 What work qualifies as assessment work? Assessment work includes, but is not limited to— ( a ) Drilling, excavations, driving shafts and tunnels, sampling (geochemical or bulk), road construction on or for the benefit of the mining claim; and
( b ) Geological, geochemical, and geophysical surveys.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Nos. 95-31278 & 96-30333

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee.

versus

DONETTA DORSETT,

Defendant-Appellant.

* * * * * * * *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DORAL HILLS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-203-L

October 9, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: *47.5.4.

2

Donetta Dorsett and Doral Hills appeal their guilty-plea convictions for

conspiracy to possess w ith intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride and for

carrying a firearm in relation to the commission of a drug trafficking crime in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) & 21 U.S.C. § 846. A loaded 9mm pistol was

found on the front seat of the vehicle on the driver’s side. Dorsett contends that she

did not have knowledge of the presence of the firearm and, therefore, she cannot

be held criminally liable under § 924(c). Hills contends that the factual basis

s u pporting his conviction is insufficient because the transaction took place away

from the vehicle and, therefore, it cannot be said that the firearm was carried “in

relation to” a drug transaction. The parties appeal their firearm convictions in light

of the intervening decision in Bailey v. United States , 116 S.Ct. 501 (1995).

We conclude that Bailey does not support appellants’ challenges. Based on

the authorities and analysis by the district court in its scholarly Order and Reasons

signed and entered February 9, 1996, the convictions appealed are AFFIRMED.
----

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Transition Report of Terax Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the six month period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), Bill Chester, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

*/s/ Bill Chester*  Bill Chester   Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)   August 17, 2004

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Terax Energy, Inc.and will be retained by Terax Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

----
#### President and Directors of Manhattan Company v. Louis Friedman Realty Co., Inc., et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
### §110. Qualified lessee construction allowances for short-term leases

#### (a) In general

Gross income of a lessee does not include any amount received in cash (or treated as a rent reduction) by a lessee from a lessor—

(1) under a short-term lease of retail space, and

(2) for the purpose of such lessee's constructing or improving qualified long-term real property for use in such lessee's trade or business at such retail space,

but only to the extent that such amount does not exceed the amount expended by the lessee for such construction or improvement.

#### (b) Consistent treatment by lessor

Qualified long-term real property constructed or improved in connection with any amount excluded from a lessee's income by reason of subsection (a) shall be treated as nonresidential real property of the lessor (including for purposes of section 168(i)(8)(B)).

#### (c) Definitions

For purposes of this section—

#### (1) Qualified long-term real property

The term "qualified long-term real property" means nonresidential real property which is part of, or otherwise present at, the retail space referred to in subsection (a) and which reverts to the lessor at the termination of the lease.

#### (2) Short-term lease

The term "short-term lease" means a lease (or other agreement for occupancy or use) of retail space for 15 years or less (as determined under the rules of section 168(i)(3)).

#### (3) Retail space

The term "retail space" means real property leased, occupied, or otherwise used by a lessee in its trade or business of selling tangible personal property or services to the general public.

#### (d) Information required to be furnished to Secretary

Under regulations, the lessee and lessor described in subsection (a) shall, at such times and in such manner as may be provided in such regulations, furnish to the Secretary—

(1) information concerning the amounts received (or treated as a rent reduction) and expended as described in subsection (a), and

(2) any other information which the Secretary deems necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 105–34, title XII, §1213(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1000.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 110, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 33, related to income taxes paid by lessee corporations, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(a)(6), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–520.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–34, title XII, §1213(e), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1001, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section and amending sections 168 and 6724 of this title] shall apply to leases entered into after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 5, 1997]."
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO.: 0:20-cv-60885-PMH

BRANDON THOMPSON,

Plaintiff, 

v.

FORT LAUDERDALE LAW GROUP

SOUTH, PLLC, 

Defendants.

_________________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DEFENDANT’S FAILURE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO 

ENFORCE SETTLEMENT, FOR SANCTIONS AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 

AGAINST DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, BRANDON THOMPSON, (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel,

hereby notifies this Court that Defendant, FORT LAUDERDALE LAW GROUP SOUTH, 

PLLC’s (“Defendant”) Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Settlement, for Sanctions and 

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs against Defendant was due March 22, 2023, but that Defendant failed 

to respond. 

As such, Plaintiff requests that the Motion to Enforce Settlement, for Sanctions and 

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs against Defendant be treated as unopposed and that same be granted.

Case 0:20-cv-60885-PMH Document 72 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/23/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

DATED this 23rd day of March, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Noah E. Storch___

Noah E. Storch, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 0085476 

RICHARD CELLER LEGAL, P.A.

10368 W. SR. 84, Suite 103

Davie, Florida 33314

Tel: (866) 344-9243

Fax: 954-337-2771

E-mail: noah@floridaovertimelawyer.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 23rd day of March, 2023, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of 

electronic filing to all Counsel of Record.

/s/ Noah E. Storch___

Noah E. Storch, Esq. 

Case 0:20-cv-60885-PMH Document 72 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/23/2023 Page 2 of 2
(No. 1090

Claimant awarded $412.00.)

#### Raymond Ellithorpe, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent,

*Opinion filed May 12, 1927.*

Hard *roads*— when *employee entitled to award. Reimbursement.*There being no dispute as to the facts in this case the court recommends an award to claimant to reimburse him for medical service and hospital expenses incurred by him on account of injuries sustained while in the performance of his duty.

Charles G. Seidel, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Merrill F. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant, a resident of the city of Elgin, Illinois, aged *36824 years, was an employee of the State Highway Department on the 29th day of October, 1923, and for several years prior thereto, and while on said day he was engaged in his occupation as a truck driver in the reconstruction of the Higgins road in Cook county, Illinois, when he was injured, another truck striking his truck, breaking both bones in his left leg.

There appears to be no contention but that the claimant was in the employ of the State while he was operating his truck and received his injury in the course of his employment. He makes a claim including medical and hospital aid of $412.00. The Department of Public Works and Buildings in a letter to the Attorney General concedes that claimant is justly entitled to the claim of $412.00.

This court is of the opinion that the claim is reasonable and just and therefore this court recommends that claimant be allowed payment of $412.00.
§ 11.37 Must the authorized official confirm exposure before implementing the Assessment Plan? ( a ) Before including any type B methodologies in the Assessment Plan, the authorized official must confirm that at least one of the natural resources identified as potentially injured in the preassessment screen has in fact been exposed to the released substance.
( b ) *Procedures.* ( 1 ) Whenever possible, exposure shall be confirmed by using existing data, such as those collected for response actions by the OSC, or other available studies or surveys of the assessment area.
( 2 ) Where sampling has been done before the completion of the preassessment screen, chemical analyses of such samples may be performed to confirm that exposure has occurred. Such analyses shall be limited to the number and type required for confirmation of exposure.
( 3 ) Where existing data are unavailable or insufficient to confirm exposure, one or more of the analytical methodologies provided in the Injury Determination phase may be used. The collection and analysis of new data shall be limited to that necessary to confirm exposure and shall not include testing for baseline levels or for injury, as those phrases are used in this part.
[51 FR 27725, Aug. 1, 1986. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 20610, 20611, May 7, 1996]