alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# lnventoryExpertService

, A d ivision o f t h e: Am e ri ca n Chemical Society Phone: 800 -631-1884, 61 4-447-3870 Fax : 61 4 - 447-3747 E-ma il : answers@cas . org Web : ww w .cas .org/p roduct s/other-cas-products/client-servic es/



### CAS INV E N

' J'ORY EXPE RT S ERV I CE REPORT I ES-ORDER NUMBER: 

# - REGISTRY NUMBER: CA I NDEX NAME



### Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. Please make the same correction{s) to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.
2540 Olentangy River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus , O H 43210-0334 USA
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology of the Brandywine area and origin of the upland of 
southern Maryland

#### Professional Paper 267-A

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp267A 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:55
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-02-15T02:00:22-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Isaac RODRIGUEZ-MARADIAGA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40994.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District Of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Carlos Isaac Rodriguez-Maradiaga (Rodriguez) appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien found in the United *187States after deportation subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Rodriguez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Rodriguez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United, States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Rodriguez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *187the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Levon Kirkland, a/k/a Vernon McKinney, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-406;

Fifth District

May 27, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

CARTER, J., took no part.

*131Robert E. Farrell, of the Office of the State Appellate Defender, of Mt. Vernon, for appellant.

Herbert J. Lantz, State’s Attorney, of Chester, for the People.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 262

 251

 265

 286

 313

 291

 270

 258

 252

 270

 240

 227

 208

 200

 203

 225

 230

 218

 205

 192

 189

 169

 164

 156

 167

 177

 182

 172

 186

 172

 163

 211

 202

 212

 221

 226

 232

 210

 204

 203

 200

 174

 170

 165

 162

 160

 164

 170

 165

 160

 147

 139

 129

 119

 117

 122

 124

 126

 132

 135

 129

 126

 231

 223

 231

 241

 255

 253

 240

 232

 224

 222

 209

 204

 186

 176

 175

 184

 190

 182

 175

 167

 157

 151

 140

 135

 139

 144

 145

 149

 152

 147

 143

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
----

Exhibit 99.3 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report ofProvident Energy Trust (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the year ended December31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas W. Buchanan, Chief Executive Officer ofProvident Energy Ltd., who performs the same function for the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company. 

| By: /s/ Thomas W. Buchanan                           |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              Thomas W. Buchanan                                                                                                           |
|              Chief Executive Officer of Provident Energy Ltd.                                                                             |

March 24, 2005 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 1:20-cv-22012-JEM

EMILIO PINERO, 

 Plaintiff,

vs.

UNIVERSITY SHOPPES SUMMIT, LLC,

 Defendant.

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

The Plaintiff, through undersigned, hereby notifies the Court that the Parties have reached 

a settlement agreement of all claims and issues that were or could have been raised by the 

Plaintiff in this lawsuit. The parties are preparing closing documents and will be moving for 

dismissal with prejudice.

Dated this October 6, 2020.

LAUREN N. WASSENBERG, ESQ.

Attorney for Plaintiff

Lauren N. Wassenberg & Associates, P.A.

1825 NW Corporate Blvd., Ste. 110

Boca Raton, FL 33431

Ph: 561.571.0646 | Fx: 561.571.0647

WassenbergL@gmail.com

By: s/ Lauren N. Wassenberg

Lauren N. Wassenberg, Esq.

(Fla. Bar No. 34083)

Case 1:20-cv-22012-JEM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2020 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY certify that on this October 06, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on all counsel or record or pro se parties identified on the Service List 

below in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated 

by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not

authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

By: s/ Lauren N. Wassenberg

Lauren N. Wassenberg, Esq.

(Fla. Bar No. 34083)

Case 1:20-cv-22012-JEM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2020 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          644816
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1108910<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    100000
<INVENTORY>                                    1846684
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5058617
<PP&E>                                         7211358<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2772338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                16693244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5801330
<BONDS>                                        6843614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      12844
<COMMON>                                         14659
<OTHER-SE>                                     2257905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  16693244
<SALES>                                        3608487<F3>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3664487<F4>
<CGS>                                          2546152<F5>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3822102<F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2640932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 20000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              231558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2798547)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2798547)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2798547)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowance for doubtful accounts
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation
<F3>Includes jukebox sales, leasing, interest and music service revenue.
<F4>Includes $56,000 of advertising revenue
<F5>Includes cost of revenue and direct operating costs.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                 (In thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                           Quarter Ended
                                                      ----------------------
                                                        April 21,  April 20,
                                                          1996       1997
                                                      -----------  ---------

Primary earnings per share:
<S>                                                   <C>          <C>  
  Weighted average number of shares outstanding.....       60,499     64,718
  Dilutive effect of common stock options
    and warrants....................................        3,818      3,248
                                                      -----------  ---------
  Adjusted primary weighted average number of
    common and equivalent shares outstanding.........      64,317     67,966
                                                      ===========  =========

Fully diluted earnings per share:
  Weighted average number of shares outstanding....        60,499     64,718
  Dilutive effect of common stock options
    and warrants....................................        3,818      3,248
                                                      -----------  ---------
  Adjusted fully diluted weighted average number of
    common and equivalent shares outstanding.........      64,317     67,966
                                                      ===========  =========

</TABLE>
Sacramento

River

T9N R3E T9N R4E

T10N R3E T10N R4E

YYOOLLOO CC OO

SSAACC RRAA MM EENN TTOO CC OO

Vin

Kiesel

Beatrice

0

6

1

7

5

8

36 31 32

2

35

12

9.3 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-2404A-R-1

Exhibit B

Sacramento, County of

725-202-121

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 18, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\sacramento_county_of\sacramento_county_of.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0929. MCCAMY PROPERTIES LLC, et al. v. COBB COUNTY,

GEORGIA et al.

Defendant Municipal Communications, LLC applied for a special land use

permit with the Zoning Division of Cobb County, Georgia, which the Cobb County

Board of Commissioners(the “Board”) approved. Subsequently,McCamyProperties,

LLC and McCamy Investments, LP filed a complaint against Cobb County Georgia,

Municipal Corporations, and the individual members of the Cobb County Board of

Commissioners in their official capacities seeking a declaratory judgment and

injunctive relief to reverse the Board’s ruling. The parties filed cross motions for

summary judgment, and the superior court granted summary judgment in favor of

Cobb County and Municipal Communications and denied the plaintiffs’ motion. The

plaintiffs then filed this direct appeal, and Municipal Communications has filed a

motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), “[a]ppeals from the decisions of the superior

courts reviewing decisions of . . . state and local administrative agencies . . . by

certiorari or de novo proceedings” must be made by filing an application for

discretionary appeal in this Court. See Consolidated Government of Columbus v.

Barwick, 274 Ga. 176, 177 (1) (549 SE2d 73) (2001); Brown v. City of Marietta, 214

Ga. App. 840, 840-842 (1) (449 SE2d 540) (1994). This statute also applies when

plaintiffs file a direct action in superior court if the substance of that action pertains

to judicial review of a zoning decision. See Hamryka v. City of Dawsonville, 291 Ga.

124, 125 (2) (728 SE2d 197) (2012) (OCGA § 5-6-35 applicable to appeals from

superior courtreview of administrative agency decision, however that judicialreview

February 25, 2016
is sought; discretionary application required where case commenced as

mandamus/declaratory judgment action seeking to invalidate zoning). 

Appellants argue that the approval by the Cobb County Board of

Commissioners of the cell tower permit application was not truly a “zoning” decision,

and thus a direct appeal was sufficient. But whether or not approval of the permit

application was a “zoning” decision, it clearly was a decision of a “local

administrative agency” within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Accordingly,

an application for discretionary appeal was necessary, no application was filed, and

we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Municipal Communications’motion to dismiss

is hereby GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/25/2016
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-120606, 333-130941, 333-17533, 333-139918, 333-147387, 333-148740, 333-156799 and 333-156800) of ZipRealty, Inc. of our report dated March 13, 2009 relating to the financialstatements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

March 13, 2009
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis of systems hardware flown on LDEF: New findings and comparison to other retrieved spacecraft hardwareThe Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF) was retrieved in 1990 after spending 69 months in low-earth-orbit (LEO). A wide variety of mechanical, electrical, thermal, and optical systems, subsystems, and components were flown on LDEF. The Systems Special Investigation Group (Systems SIG) was formed by NASA to investigate the effects of the 69 month exposure on systems related hardware and to coordinate and collate all systems analysis of LDEF hardware. This report is the Systems SIG final report which updates earlier findings and compares LDEF systems findings to results from other retrieved spacecraft hardware such as Hubble Space Telescope. Also included are sections titled (1) Effects of Long Duration Space Exposure on Optical Scatter, (2) Contamination Survey of LDEF, and (3) Degradation of Optical Materials in Space.Document ID19960002004Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDursch, Harry*(Boeing Defense and Space Group Seattle, WA, United States)*Bohnhoff-Hlavacek, Gail*(Boeing Defense and Space Group Seattle, WA, United States)*Blue, Donald*(Georgia Tech Research Inst. Atlanta, GA., United States)*Hansen, Patricia*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1995Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:4693NASA-CR-4693Accession Number96N12012Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 233-03-02-02CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-19247Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960002004.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4643 

To conduct a study of the collection of biometric information by State law 

enforcement agencies, to establish a grant program to assist State, tribal, 

and local law enforcement agencies to implement best practices, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2022 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself and Mr. HAGERTY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To conduct a study of the collection of biometric information 

by State law enforcement agencies, to establish a grant 

program to assist State, tribal, and local law enforcement 

agencies to implement best practices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Biometric Collection 

5 Improvement Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4643 IS

1 SEC. 2. STATE PRACTICES FOR COLLECTING BIOMETRIC 

2 INFORMATION. 

3 (a) STUDY.—The Director of the Bureau of Justice 

4 Statistics, in consultation with the Director of the Federal 

5 Bureau of Investigation, shall conduct a study to deter6 mine how State law enforcement agencies collect biometric 

7 information in the administration of the criminal justice 

8 system. 

9 (b) REPORT.—After completing the study required 

10 under subsection (a), the Director of the Bureau of Jus11 tice Statistics shall submit a report containing the results 

12 of such study to— 

13 (1) the Committee on the Judiciary of the Sen14 ate; 

15 (2) the Committee on the Judiciary of the 

16 House of Representatives; and 

17 (3) the Attorney General. 

18 (c) RECOMMENDATIONS.—The Attorney General, in 

19 consultation with the Director of the Bureau of Justice 

20 Statistics and the Director of the Federal Bureau of In21 vestigation, shall provide recommendations to the chief law 

22 enforcement officer in each State that contain best prac23 tices for improving the collection of biometric information 

24 in the administration of the criminal justice system, in25 cluding any legislative reform needed to implement such 

26 improvements. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4643 IS

1 (d) FUNDING.—The study, report, and recommenda2 tions required under this section shall be carried out with 

3 existing funding. 

4 SEC. 3. BIOMETRIC GRANT PROGRAM. 

5 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Assistant Attorney Gen6 eral of the Office of Justice Programs, working through 

7 the appropriate administrative agency in each State, shall 

8 award competitive grants to State, tribal, and local law 

9 enforcement agencies to assist such agencies to implement 

10 the best practices referred to in section 2(c). 

11 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

12 authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of the 

13 fiscal year 2023 through 2027 for grants authorized under 

14 subsection (a). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS