alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-22054-DPG

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 

3G LICENSING S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NOETIC, INC. and SUN CUPID 

TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD. 

Defendants.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT SUN CUPID TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD. 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiffs Sisvel International S.A., 

3G Licensing S.A., and Sisvel S.p.A. (“Plaintiffs”) hereby dismiss this action against Defendant 

Sun Cupid Technology (HK) Ltd. (“Sun Cupid”) without prejudice. According to Rule 41(a)(1), 

an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court by filing a notice of dismissal at 

any time before service by the adverse party of an answer. Defendant Sun Cupid has not yet 

answered the Complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss this action against Defendant 

Sun Cupid without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1). Each party shall bear its own costs, 

expenses, and attorneys’ fees. 

[Signature Appears on Next Page] 

Case 1:20-cv-22054-DPG Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

Dated: September 8, 2020 /s/Jorge Espinosa 

Jorge Espinosa, Esq. 

Florida Bar No: 779032 

jorge.espinosa@gray-robinson.com 

Francesca Russo, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 174912 

francesca.russo@gray-robinson.com 

Robert R. Jimenez, Esq. 

Fla. Bar. No. 72020 

robert.jimenez@gray-robinson.com 

GRAY | ROBINSON, P.A. 

333 S.E. 2nd Ave., Suite 3200 

Miami, FL 33131 

Tel: 305-416-6880 

Fax: 305-416-6887 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A., 

3G Licensing, S.A., and SISVEL S.p.A. 

Case 1:20-cv-22054-DPG Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### Henry Mann, Appellant, v. Simmonds Development Corporation, Limited, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1





Certification pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen Brock, CEO and Principal Financial Officer of Public Company Management Corporation, certifies that:

1.

This
annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this
annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant;

2.

I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Public Company Management Corporation;

3.

Based on my knowledge, this
annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

4.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report ("Evaluation Date"); and

c)

presented in this
annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

6.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors [or persons performing the equivalent function]:

a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

7.

I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:

December 29, 2005

By:

/s/ Stephen Brock

Stephen Brock, CEO and Principal Financial Officer
#### In re: Martell WHITAKER, Petitioner.

No. 05-7681.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 3, 2006.

Decided Feb. 28, 2006.

Martell Whitaker, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Martell Whitaker petitions this court for writ of mandamus. He seeks a an order directing the district court to conduct a jury trial of a criminal forfeiture matter. Because the forfeiture matter has been *169resolved, and Whitaker is not entitled to the relief sought, we dismiss the mandamus petition.

Whitaker was convicted by jury of money laundering conspiracy. According to the district court’s Judgment and Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, “[ajfter his conviction, [Whitaker] waived his right to a trial by jury on forfeiture allegations and agreed for the Court to decide the forfeiture issues as they related to the money laundering conspiracy.” *United States v. Whitaker,*No. 98-1016 (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 1999) (unpublished order). The court found $60,000 in currency and a 1994 dark purple Lexus subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1) (2000). The order further recited that if, after appropriate publication, no third parties claimed an interest in the subject property, the preliminary order “shall constitute a final judgment of forfeiture.” There were no third-party claims to the property, and the order therefore became final.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used sparingly in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Mandamus relief is available only when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, *id.,*and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re Catawba Indian Tribe,*973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires and that his entitlement to such relief is clear and indisputable. *Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,*449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980).

Whitaker has failed to make the requisite showing, and we accordingly dismiss his petition for writ of mandamus. We deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DISMISSED*
#### § 3505.11 Do I need a prospecting permit to collect mineral specimens for non-commercial purposes?

No. You may collect mineral specimens for hobby, recreation, scientific, research or similar purposes without a prospecting permit. However, the surface management agency may require a use permit. BLM's regulations for collecting mineral specimens are at part 8365 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements for the three month period ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          27,777
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,777
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,760
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,777
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,117)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,117)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,117)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### §5116. Standards for Indians appointed to Indian Office

The Secretary of the Interior is directed to establish standards of health, age, character, experience, knowledge, and ability for Indians who may be appointed, without regard to civil-service laws, to the various positions maintained, now or hereafter, by the Indian Office, in the administration of functions or services affecting any Indian tribe. Such qualified Indians shall hereafter have the preference to appointment to vacancies in any such positions.

(June 18, 1934, ch. 576, §12, 48 Stat. 986.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 472 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Conversion to Career Appointment

Status of Indian appointed to Federal service under excepted appointment to be converted to career appointment in competitive service after three years of continuous service and satisfactory performance, see section 5323(m) of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
§ 3809.602 Can BLM revoke my plan of operations or nullify my notice? ( a ) BLM may revoke your plan of operations or nullify your notice upon finding that— ( 1 ) A violation exists of any provision of your notice, plan of operation, or this subpart, and you have failed to correct the violation within the time specified in the enforcement order issued under § 3809.601; or
( 2 ) a pattern of violations exists at your operations.
( b ) The finding is not effective until BLM notifies you of its intent to revoke your plan or nullify your notice, and BLM provides you an opportunity for an informal hearing before the BLM State Director.
( c ) If BLM nullifies your notice or revokes your plan of operations, you must not conduct operations on the public lands in the project area, except for reclamation and other measures specified by BLM.
#### § 3512.19 Must I notify BLM if I intend to transfer an overriding royalty to another party?

Yes. Although we do not approve these transfers, you must file all overriding royalty interest transfers with the BLM within 90 days from the date of execution. Include the transferee's statement of qualifications required in subpart 3502 and the filing fee for transfer of overriding royalty found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter.

[64 FR 53536, Oct. 1, 1999, as amended at 72 FR 50888, Sept. 5, 2007]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 159 (Friday, October 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 60408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22659]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, Adult and Adolescent Interventions.
    Date: October 29, 2004.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Four Points by Sheraton Bethesda, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Aileen Schulte, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 6140, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, (301) 443-1225, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fd9c8e9e9588918998bd909c9491d3939495d39a928b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bfdeccdcd7cad3cbdaffd2ded6d391d1d6d791d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health research Grants; 93281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 4, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22659 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
RECORD OF DECISION

and

Approved Pinedale

Resource Management Plan

for

Public Lands Administered

by the

Bureau of Land Management

Pinedale Field Office

Pinedale, Wyoming

Prepared by

United States Department of the Interior

Bureau of Land Management

Pinedale Field Office

November 2008

Wyoming State Directo

NOV 26 ZOO8

Date
#### § 3809.424 What are my obligations if I stop conducting operations?

(a) To see what you must do if you stop conducting operations, follow this table:

| If— | Then— |
| --- | --- |
| (1) You stop conducting operations for any period of time | (1) You must follow your approved interim management plan submitted under § 3809.401(b)(5); (ii) You must submit a modification to your interim management plan to BLM within 30 calendar days if it does not cover the circumstances of your temporary closure per § 3809.431(a); (iii) You must take all necessary actions to assure that unnecessary or undue degradation does not occur; and (iv) You must maintain an adequate financial guarantee. |
| (2) The period of non-operation is likely to cause unnecessary or undue degradation | The BLM will require you to take all necessary actions to assure that unnecessary or undue degradation does not occur, including requiring you, after an extended period of non-operation for other than seasonal operations, to remove all structures, equipment, and other facilities and reclaim the project area. |
| (3) Your operations are inactive for 5 consecutive years | BLM will review your operations and determine whether BLM should terminate your plan of operations and direct final reclamation and closure. |
| (4) BLM determines that you abandoned your operations | BLM may initiate forfeiture under § 3809.595. If the amount of the financial guarantee is inadequate to cover the costs of reclamation, BLM may complete the reclamation, and the operator and all other responsible persons are liable for the costs of such reclamation. See § 3809.336(a) for indicators of abandonment. |

(b) Your reclamation and closure obligations continue until satisfied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

KAD/Research 1

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BING JING CHEN, a.k.a. Tonya Wing

See Chiang,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-72150

Agency No. A076-208-985

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Bing Jing Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum and withholding of

FILED

DEC 28 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
KAD/Research 2 07-72150

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence, Tekle v. Mukasey, 533 F.3d 1044, 1051 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the

petition for review.

Chen testified that prior to the arrest of members of her religious group, the

police came to her home several times, warned her, and confiscated her religious

books. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination

because Chen omitted this information from her otherwise detailed asylum

application, and failed to explain adequately this significant omission. See Li v.

Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 963 (9th Cir. 2004). In the absence of credible testimony,

Chen’s claims for asylum and withholding of removal fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft,

348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### § 4.23 Transcript of hearings.

Hearings will be recorded verbatim and transcripts thereof shall be made when requested by interested parties, costs of transcripts to be borne by the requesting parties. Fees for transcripts prepared from recordings by Office of Hearings and Appeals employees will be at rates which cover the cost of manpower, machine use and materials, plus 25 percent, adjusted to the nearest 5 cents. If the reporting is done pursuant to a contract between the reporter and the Department of the Interior Agency or office which is involved in the proceeding, or the Office of Hearings and Appeals, fees for transcripts will be at rates established by the contract.
### §5687. Penalty for offenses not specifically covered

Whoever violates any provision of this chapter or regulations issued pursuant thereto, for which a specific criminal penalty is not prescribed by this chapter, shall be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both, for each such offense.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1412.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5687, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 700, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

Prior section 5687 also related to forfeitures applicable to distillers, rectifiers, and wholesale liquor dealers for offenses not specifically covered. See sections 7301 and 7302 of this title.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior sections 5602, 5608(c), 5612 to 5619, 5627, 5628, 5630, 5631, 5643, 5684(a) and 5686(a), act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 683, 685, 686, 689, 692, 693, 699, 700, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.
### §442. Change of annual accounting period

If a taxpayer changes his annual accounting period, the new accounting period shall become the taxpayer's taxable year only if the change is approved by the Secretary. For purposes of this subtitle, if a taxpayer to whom section 441(g) applies adopts an annual accounting period (as defined in section 441(c)) other than a calendar year, the taxpayer shall be treated as having changed his annual accounting period.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 149; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE:

9:30 a.m., Wednesday, October 13, 2004.

# PLACE:

NTSB Board Room, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594

# STATUS:

The two items are open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

7671 Aviation Accident Report—In-fight Engine Failure and Subsequent Ditching of Air Sunshine, Inc., flight 527, Cessna 402C, N314AB, about 7.35 Nautical Miles West-Northwest of Treasure Cay, Great Abaco Island, Bahamas, July 13, 2003.

7666 Pipeline Accident Report—Storage Tank Explosion and Fire in Glenpool, Oklahoma, April 7, 2003.

# News Media Contact:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Ms. Carolyn Dargan at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, October 8, 2004.

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived Webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *http://www.ntsb.gov*.                    

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: October 2, 2004.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-22579  Filed 10-4-04; 12:30 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P