alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

www.spirelawfirm.com

Employment Attorneys

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION

BRANDON THOMPSON, 

Plaintiff,

v.

FORT LAUDERDALE LAW GROUP 

SOUTH, PLLC, a Florida Limited Liability 

Company,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 0:20-cv-60885

UNOPPOSED NUNC PRO TUNC MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Defendant, FORT LAUDERDALE LAW GROUP SOUTH, PLLC, (“Defendant”) 

respectfully moves, nunc pro tunc, pursuant to Federal Rule 6(b) for a brief extension of time, up 

to and including July 7, 2020 to file an Answer to the Plaintiff’s Complaint and statesthe following 

in support: 

1. Plaintiff filed the Complaint on May 1, 2020. On June 3, 2020 the Defendant, through its 

Manager, sought an extension of time to respond to the Complaint (Doc. 7), and the Court granted 

an extension up to and including June 15, 2020 (Doc. 8).

2. On June 15, 2020 undersigned was retained to represent the Defendant in this matter and 

sough an extension of time to respond to the Complaint up to and including July 6, 2020.

3. In the intervening time there was an error in calendaring in the undersigned’s office causing 

the Answer to be filed one day late. Accordingly, Defendant respectfully requests a nunc pro tunc 

extension of the deadline to respond to the Complaint by one day, up to and including July 7, 2020.

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020 Page 1 of 3
2

www.spirelawfirm.com

Employment Attorneys

4. This Court may grant the requested enlargement of time for good cause shown when a 

party fails to act before time has expired because of excusable neglect. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(B).

Errors in calendaring are typically classified as excusable neglect.

5. This extension is not being sought for the purposes of delay, nor will this brief extension 

prejudice any party to the litigation.

WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests a nunc pro tunc extension of time up to 

and including July 7, 2020, to answer Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

LOCAL RULE 7.1(a)(3) CERTIFICATE

Counsel for Defendant has conferred with counsel for Plaintiff who has no objection to 

the relief requested.

DATED this 7th day of July, 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

Spire Law, LLC

2572 W. State Road 426, 

Suite 2088

Oviedo, Florida 32826

By: s/Jesse I. Unruh

Jesse I. Unruh, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 93121

jesse@spirelawfirm.com

Attorney for Defendant

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020 Page 2 of 3
3

www.spirelawfirm.com

Employment Attorneys

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby Certify that on this 7th day of July, 2020, the foregoing was electronically filed 

with the Court by using the Southern District of Florida’s CM/ECF portal, which will send a notice 

of electronic filing to: Noah E Storch, Esq. at noah@floridaovertimelawyer.com, RICHARD 

CELLER LEGAL, P.A., 10368 West State Road 84, Suite 103, Davie, Florida 33324.

/s/ Jesse Unruh

Jesse Unruh

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2020 Page 3 of 3
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-20556

Summary Calendar

KENNEY & ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

CENTRAL UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

H-96-CV-2424)

June 14, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This appeal involves the claim of Kenney & Associates, Inc.

("Kenney") for breach of contract against Central United Life

Insurance Company ("CULIC") for CULIC’s failure to pay a one

percent (1%) finder’s fee to Kenney. CULIC defended against the

claim by denying the existence of any contract, or in the

alternative, if a contract existed, Kenney allegedly did not
2

perform under the terms of the contract. CULIC moved for summary

judgment but the district court denied such motion on the grounds

that there were material facts in dispute regarding the services

Kenney was to perform under the contract. The controversy was

submitted to the jury on special issues. The district court

entered judgment on the jury verdict in favor of Kenney. CULIC

appeals from the final judgment and the later order denying CULIC’s

renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, or in the

alternative motion for new trial, or in the alternative motion to

amend judgment.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts and relevant portions of the record itself. For

the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum and

Order entered May 12, 1998, we AFFIRM the Final Judgment entered by

the district court under date of December 17, 1997.

AFFIRMED.
### §467. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 467 was editorially reclassified as section 5110 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 356

 351

 337

 331

 349

 348

 348

 353

 354

 377

 375

 374

 387

 387

 388

 377

 372

 378

 372

 376

 369

 376

 366

 376

 364

 372

 381

 382

 430

 453

 468

 321

 316

 315

 317

 327

 332

 336

 339

 342

 345

 346

 349

 351

 356

 359

 355

 351

 356

 353

 351

 347

 344

 339

 338

 334

 329

 331

 331

 331

 333

 333

 328

 324

 321

 322

 333

 336

 340

 344

 346

 351

 353

 356

 359

 364

 365

 364

 360

 364

 360

 357

 355

 353

 350

 350

 347

 345

 343

 343

 360

 359

 361

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 16, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Sacramento River

T13N R1E T13N R2E

T14N R1E T14N R2E

59.8 L

64.35 L

1 5 2

8

6

11 7

36

13 17 14

12

32

26

18

35

25 29

31

30

3

15

27

34

10

4

9

28

33

19 24 20

16

23 22 21

Tisdale

Cranmore

Hinsdale

Everglade

Fraziers Landing

Contract No. 14-06-200-2520A-R-1

Exhibit B

Kary, Carol

725-202-78

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 9, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\kary_carol\kary_carol.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
**Exhibit 32.2**
**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**
In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of MeriStar HospitalityOperating Partnership, L.P., MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp., MeriStarHospitality Finance Corp. II and MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III (the“Issuers”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DonaldD. Olinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuers, hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:
 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o(d));and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Issuers.   Date: March 15, 2004   */s/ Donald D. Olinger*   Donald D. Olinger Chief Financial Officer MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III
§ 3802.1-7 Existing operations. ( a ) Persons conducting mining operations on the effective date of these regulations, who would be required to submit a plan of operations under § 3802.1-1 of this title, may continue operations but shall, within 60 days after the effective date of these regulations, submit a plan of operations. Upon a showing of good cause, the authorized officer shall grant an extension of time to submit a plan of operations not to exceed an additional 180 days.
( b ) Operations may continue according to the submitted plan of operations during its review unless the operator is notified otherwise by the authorized officer.
( c ) Upon approval of a plan of operations, mining operations shall be conducted in accordance with the approved plan.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Petit Manan National

Wildlife Refuge Complex

Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan

and Environmental Impact Statement

April 2004

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Cover Photos: Cross Island, USFWS

Harbor seal, USFWS

Atlantic puffin, USFWS

Roseate tern, Gil Lopez-Espina

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principal Federal agency responsible for

conserving, protecting, and enhancing fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the

continuing benefit of the American people. The Service manages the 94-million acre

National Wildlife Refuge system comprised of more than 535 national wildlife refuges

and thousands of waterfowl production areas. It also operates 65 national fish

hatcheries and 78 ecological services field stations. The agency enforces Federal

wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores nationally significant

fisheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the

Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation

efforts. It also oversees the Federal Aid Program which distributes hundreds of

millions of dollars in excise taxes on fishing and hunting equipment to state wildlife

agencies.

Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management

decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge

purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail

program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget

allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program

prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing

increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land

acquisition.

This goose, designed by J.N. “Ding”

Darling, has become a symbol of the

National Wildlife Refuge System.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Northeast Regional Office

300 Westgate Center Drive

Hadley, MA 01035

Petit Manan National

Wildlife Refuge Complex

Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan

and Environmental Impact Statement

April 2004

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Petit Manan National Wildlife Refuge Complex

P.O. Box 279, Water Street

Milbridge, ME 04658-0279

207/546-2124

petitmanan@fws.gov

http://petitmanan.fws.gov

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Website

http://www.fws.gov

For National Wildlife Refuge System Information:

1800/344 WILD

http://www.refuges.fws.gov

Federal Relay Service

for the deaf or hard of hearing

1800/877 8339

April 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.

This certification is provided
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K/A (the Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the
Issuer).

I, W. Marston Becker, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer certify that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: November 13, 2006



/s/ W. Marston BeckerName: W. Marston Becker
### §1774c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–503, §5, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1295, which related to responsibilities and restrictions concerning leases, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3513.20 What is a suspension of operations and production (conservation concerns)?

A suspension of operations and production (conservation concerns) is a BLM action where BLM orders or allows you to suspend operations in the interest of conservation of natural resources.
§ 3604.21 What is the term of a free use permit? ( a ) BLM will determine the appropriate length of your free use permit term. ( 1 ) BLM will not grant free use permits to government entities for terms exceeding 10 years.
( 2 ) BLM will not grant free use permits to non-profit organizations for terms exceeding one year.
( b ) BLM may extend any free use permit term for a single additional period not to exceed one year.
**** CASE NUMBER: 502020CA000463XXXXMB Div: AO**** 

Filing# 101585652 E-Filed 01/13/2020 06:38:21 PM 

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH 

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR 

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 

JEAN EDOUASSAINT, CASE NO.: 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

PRESTRESSED CONTRACTORS, INC., 

Defendant. 

---------------'/ 

COMPLAINT 

Plaintiff, JEAN EDOUASSAINT (hereinafter, 

1. 

recover all 

Statute"). 

2. 

� JURISDICTION AND VENUE 

he amo�t, in controversy in this matter exceeds the jurisdictional minimum of 

All such acts alleged herein were committed within this judicial circuit and 

4. Plaintiff has satisfied all conditions precedent to the maintenance of this action.

FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK, 01/13/2020 06:38:21 PM 

EXHIBIT 2

Case 9:20-cv-80687-RAR Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2020 Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT 2

Case 9:20-cv-80687-RAR Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2020 Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT 2

Case 9:20-cv-80687-RAR Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2020 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Advisory Committee (MPSAC), #66.                    

*Date/Time:*                         November 3, 2004, 8 a.m.-6 p.m.; November 4, 2004, 8 a.m.-6 p.m.; November 5, 2004, 8 a.m.-3 p.m.                     

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Room 375.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Morris L. Aizenman, Senior Science Associate, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Room 1005, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8807.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning NSF science and education activities within the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences.                    

*Agenda:*

Briefing to new members about NSF and Directorate.

Update on current status of Directorate.

Overview of Facilities.

Meeting with Education and Human Resources Advisory Committee.

Report on CyberScience and Theory Workshops.

Meeting of MPSAC with Divisions within MPS Directorate.

Discussion of MPS Long-term Planning Activities.  

*Summary Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

      ( print page 59278)    
Dated: September 28, 2004.

Susanne E. Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-22223  Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 (the Form
10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 19, 2013



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MELISSA MORRISON   
|Melissa Morrison       
|Chief Financial Officer
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WESTERN REGION

P. O. BOX 92007. WORLDWAY POSTAL CENTEH

LOS ANGELES, CALIF'OI?NIA 90009

FiB 23 1981

EXHIBIT

I+7£M63

February 12, 1981

Honorable John J. Bambrick

Mayor of Santa Monica

City Hall

1685 Main Street

Santa Monica, California 9b401

Dear Mayor Bambrick:

We have been informed that the Santa Monica City Council

has directed City Officials to issue tenancy termination

notices to virtually all of the business tenants located

at Santa Monica Municipal Airport. This letter is to

inquire whether it is the intention of the City Council

to effect a termination in the use of the present airport

property for airport purposes on either an immediate or

phased basis.

The airport tenants selected to receive notices to quit

the premises perform and provide that variety of aeronautical services typically found on, and necessary for

the economic and functional support of, an airport. Thus,

the City Council's action clearly appears to be the intial

step towards closure of the airport.

In making this inquiry, we are mindful of the concern

expressed by Santa Monica officials in recent years that

the airport site would represent a much greater revenue

potential for the City if it were developed and devoted to

other than airport purposes. In fact, the issue of closure

of this airport was addressed by an opinion dated May 30,

1975, by the Attorney General, State of California, which

reached the conclusion that the City could not cease using

the airport for airport purposes. Whether the City, by

evicting tenants who provide aeronautical services, is
2

ceasing to use airport property for airport purposes,

is a further question to be considered.

We hope the City Council's concern also extends to the

vital importance of this site as an active and needed

public airport, for both the present and the future.

As you are aware, Santa Monica Municipal Airport has

been and continues to be an essential part of the

national air transportation system and a crucial

element in the system of reliever airports serving the

Los Angeles basin. This is attested to by the Federal

funds expended over the years to develop the airport

and to install navigation and landing aids. It is

our singleminded belief that all agreements with the

Federal Government regarding the use of this airport

property for airport purposes must be honored.

We look fonvard to hearing from you in this matter.

Sincerely,

J" /6e ~

, / i .. .. _ ,

.i:-_ U,- _ ,; d·, ~c' ~~ .,

e\H~TE T. ,AWSON, JR.

Regional Counsel

cc:

City Councilmen

City Manager

City Attorney
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATE



As required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, (as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002), I certify that:



(1)        The Quarterly Report of Univercell Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)        The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Sean Fulda

Sean Fulda

chief executive officer and chief financial officer

November 19, 2004
§ 3602.44 How do I make a bid deposit? ( a ) If you wish to make a bid to purchase mineral materials, you must submit a deposit in advance of the sale. ( 1 ) Your sealed bids must contain a deposit.
( 2 ) At an oral auction, you must make your deposit before the opening of the bidding.
( b ) Your deposit must be the greater of $500 or 5 percent of the appraised value as we specify in the sale notice.
( c ) Your deposit may be in the form of cash, a money order, a bank draft, or a cashier's or certified check made payable to the Bureau of Land Management.
( d ) If you are not the successful bidder, BLM will return your bid deposit when the bidding concludes.
( e ) If you are the successful bidder, BLM will apply your deposit to the purchase price.
( f ) BLM will charge the successful bidder a processing fee on a case-by-case basis as described in § 3000.11 of this chapter and § 3602.43.
[66 FR 58901, Nov. 23, 2001, as amended at 70 FR 58878, Oct. 7, 2005]