alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3192.17 Can BLM reinstate cooperative agreements that have been terminated? ( a ) If your cooperative agreement was terminated by consent, you may request that BLM reinstate the agreement at any time.
( b ) If BLM terminated an agreement because you did not carry out the terms of the agreement, you must prove that you have corrected the problem(s) and are able to carry out the terms of the agreement.
( c ) For any reinstatement request BLM will decide whether or not your cooperative agreement may be reinstated and, if so, whether you must make any changes to the agreement before it can be reinstated.
§ 3170.2 Scope. The regulations in this part apply to: ( a ) All Federal onshore and Indian oil and gas leases (other than those of the Osage Tribe);
( b ) Indian Mineral Development Act (IMDA) agreements for oil and gas, unless specifically excluded in the agreement or unless the relevant provisions of the rule are inconsistent with the agreement;
( c ) Leases and other business agreements for the development of tribal energy resources under a Tribal Energy Resource Agreement entered into with the Secretary, unless specifically excluded in the lease, other business agreement, or Tribal Energy Resource Agreement;
( d ) State or private tracts committed to a federally approved unit or communitization agreement (CA) as defined by or established under 43 CFR subpart 3105 or 43 CFR part 3180; and
( e ) All onshore facility measurement points where oil or gas produced from the leases or agreements identified earlier in this section is measured.
#### In the Matter of Little Home for Friendless Animals, Inc., Appellant, against Russell P. Koehler et al., as Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Islip, Respondents.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.; Wenzel, J., not voting. [See *ante,*p. 859.]
§ 3809.809 May I appeal a decision made by the State Director? ( a ) An adversely affected party may appeal the State Director's decision to OHA under part 4 of this title, except that you may not appeal a denial of your request for State Director review or a denial of your request for a meeting with the State Director.
( b ) Once the State Director issues a decision under this subpart, it replaces the original BLM decision, which is no longer in effect, and you may appeal only the State Director's decision.
### §2203. Definition of executor

The term "executor" wherever it is used in this title in connection with the estate tax imposed by this chapter means the executor or administrator of the decedent, or, if there is no executor or administrator appointed, qualified, and acting within the United States, then any person in actual or constructive possession of any property of the decedent.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 401.)
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

			Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of the			registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's Annual			Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form 10-KSB")			fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities			Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB,			fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results			of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: May 20, 2008
			 By: /s/ Atsushi Maki					Atsushi Maki					Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
### §774. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1085, §4, 68 Stat. 980, which provided for costs incurred in the preparation of tribal rolls and the payment of per capita shares to be paid out of judgment funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
STOLT OFFSHORE S.A.                                [LOGO OF STOLT OFFSHORE S.A.]

NEWS RELEASE

              STOLT OFFSHORE S.A. ANNOUNCES ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

LONDON, ENGLAND - MARCH 9, 2006 - Stolt Offshore S.A. (NasdaqNM: SOSA; Oslo
Stock Exchange: STO) today announced that its annual meeting of shareholders
will be held on Monday May 15, 2006 at 3:00 p.m. local time at the offices of
Services Generaux de Gestion S.A., 23, avenue Monterey, L-2086 Luxembourg. All
shareholders of record as of Friday March 24, 2006 will be entitled to vote at
the meeting.

********************************************************************************

Stolt Offshore S.A. is a seabed-to-surface engineering and construction
contractor for the offshore oil and gas industry worldwide. We plan, design and
deliver complex, integrated projects in harsh and challenging environments. We
operate internationally as one group - globally aware and locally sensitive,
sharing our expertise and experience to create innovative solutions. We are more
than solution providers, we are solution partners - ready to make long-term
investments in our people, assets, know-how and relationships in support of our
clients.

********************************************************************************

Contacts:
Deborah Keedy
Stolt Offshore S.A.
UK +44 1932 773767
US  +1 877 603 0267 (toll free)
deborah.keedy@acergy-group.com

Julian Thomson
Stolt Offshore S.A.
UK +44 1932 773764
US  +1 877 603 0267 (toll free)
julian.thomson@acergy-group.com

If you no longer wish to receive our press releases please contact:
kelly.good@acergy-group.com.
#### § 3837.10 Conditions for acquiring a delinquent co-claimant's interests.
## DOT - Otr - 2000 - fc'»-f 5

& U^ . Departmen t o f A^^laion t Soamof y l200Newiofi6 y Avunu o S t TrOflHK'rtatkM l WosKingTon , D C 2059 0 Offic e o f ih e Secfelar y ofTrcinspofratio n ;^Pf ^ 1 3 201 !

Vic e Presiden t ^

(icnera j Muiiaue r'J_ lolan i Ai r~ 73-3()( ) U'l i Siav i Kailna-Kona . Ilauai i 9674f l Deii rMr . Siewari : ^ ~ Th;ui k yoi t lo ryou remai l messag e t> ( Marc h 3 1 rcgaaim g yiHi riiitcres i i n th e reques i fo r proposal s l o provid e essentia l ai rservic e (I:AS ) a t Kalaupapa . Th e 1;A S proyia m i s administere d h y di e Depanmeni' s OlTie e o f Avialioi i Analysi s an d lall s tnide i ni y purview . re.spondeiic e an d (h e entir e n e ihrttLi'j h th e A s yo u ma y know , tli e reques t lo rproposals . Departmen t cone.spon d publi c docke t rcgardiui ; liA S a i th e coinmuuii y ma y h e accesse d onlin e ihrttu;J h lH e l-cd'-Ma l Docke t Managemen t S\stci n ai : tUiJ^-Z^!!V>'^jy;.!l'^li!i'iilli^!li\ - Ihuuiii h a searc h o n IXK'ke i Numbe rD O T^OS' l -2(K)l)-07?3 . W e wil l als o plac e you remai l oddrcs s 01 1 th e »;eivie e lis f to ral l rcouesf s (o rl-'A S oronosaK . A s i s ou rnorma l practice . I a m placini ! a cop y o f you rlelte ran d m y respons e i n Docke t 20f)i)-(">77 3 a s a comac i outsid e (h e recor d o f thi s pioceeding . H ' yo u i\i:ci \ rmtlie r inlormatto n o rassistance , pleas e contac t Mr . Denni s DeVan y a l (202 ) 366-11)01 . o rMr . Bria n Swaiiso n a

t (202 ) 36 6 ^3'-i2 . Than k yo u lo rytm rinicres t i n th e l:A S program . Sincerel y yi>urs . Susa n L . Kurian d Assistan t Secretar y lo r Aviatio n an d liilernationa t .'Miair s

## Pettlford , Mari e (OST )

From : R.D . Stewar t [rds0ioianialr.com ] Sent : Thursday , Marc h 31 , 201 1 12:2 5 A M To : LaHood . Ra y (OST ) Co : Han KYoung e Subject : Kalaupapa , Moloka i EA S progra m 

## Hell o Mr . LaHood , I understandyo

u are familia

r wit h th e problem s experience db y local Molokai an dKalaupap aresident s wh

o needair transpor t acces s bac k

andfort h betwee n th e tw o airports . A s aloca l air carrier under FA R135 , we ar

e keenl y intereste di

n an y EA S proposal s or

contract s which migh

t b e publishe di

n the nea r future . Can you provid e me wit h the administrativ e informatio n o r th e contractin g entit y i n charg e of

thi s program . I woul dver y much appreciate an

y informatio n whic h woul dallo w u s to prepare for suc h a n RFP . Sincerely . r dStewar t R D Stewart , VP&G M lolani Ai

r Off : 80 8 32 9 001 8
## Subtitle J—Coal Industry Health Benefits

Chapter
Sec. 1
99.
Coal industry health benefits
9701

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
§ 3205.6 When may BLM issue a direct use lease to an applicant? ( a ) BLM may issue a direct use lease to an applicant if the following conditions are satisfied: ( 1 ) The lands included in the lease application are open for geothermal leasing;
( 2 ) BLM determines that the lands are appropriate for exclusive direct use operations, without sale, for purposes other than commercial generation of electricity;
( 3 ) The acreage covered by the lease application is not greater than the quantity of acreage that is reasonably necessary for the proposed use;
( 4 ) BLM has published a notice of the land proposed for a direct use lease for 90 days before issuing the lease;
( 5 ) During the 90-day period beginning on the date of publication, BLM did not receive any nomination to include the lands in the next competitive lease sale following that period for which the lands would be eligible;
( 6 ) BLM determines there is no competitive interest in the resource; and
( 7 ) The applicant is the first qualified applicant.
( b ) If BLM determines that the land for which an applicant has applied under this subpart is open for geothermal leasing and is appropriate only for exclusive direct use operations, but determines that there is competitive interest in the resource, it will include the land in a competitive lease sale with lease stipulations limiting operations to exclusive direct use.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Gregory R. Hulligner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 10, 2008
#### Bowers *v.*The State.

November 15, 1910.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Freeman. Coweta superior court. , June 14, 1910.

*J. G. Newman,*for plaintiff in error.

77. *A. Hall, attorney-general,*and *J.*77. *Terrell, solicitor-general,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

1. Tlie court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial on tlie ground of tlie alleged newly discovered evidence; as it was merely cumulative and impeaching in character; and besides, it .appears that both of the affiants to such evidence were subpoenaed as witnesses by the accused before the trial, and that upon the hearing of the motion for a new trial the State submitted affidavits directly contradicting those setting forth the alleged newly discovered evidence.

2. There was no merit in the ground of the. motion for a new trial to the effect that the accused “was deceived and entrapped by the principal witnesses” who testified for the State (naming them), in that, during the term of court at which the accused was tried and prior to his trial, such witnesses informed the accused that they knew nothing of- the homicide for which he was indicted and nothing as to any connection he had with it. Especially was such ground not cause for a new trial when it does not appear that the court’s attention was in any way called 'to the fact that the accused had been so deceived and entrapped, until the motion for a new trial was presented.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
---- 04/08/2010 14:03 FAX 2024935142 001/002 

Rush Air Cargo, Tnc. 

r.o. Box 93144 . Aneilomgc. AI<1SKa 99509-3144 (907) 277.7657 • Fax (907) 114-1725 

March 16,2010 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attention; Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC·430 

Wilber Wright Building, Room 2WIOOO 

800 Independence Ave., S. W, 

Washington, J)C 20591 

QJ'/() AJ., OfJO( /dO/{) - 03i/ Re: Case No. 2009AL030119 

Dear Sir or Madam:· 

Unclosed is a copy ofthe Federal A vialion Administration's Final Notice o/PropmNd 

Civil PenLllty against Bush Air Cargo, Inc. ("BAC"). [n accordance with Subpart G of 

Part 13 ofthe Federal Aviation Administration Regulations, BAC requests an NTSB 

hearing based on the proposed penalty being Lmwarranted under the Federal A viatioll 

Administration regulations and, alternatively, excessive under the circumstances. 

Rarton M. Tieman, President 

Bush Air Cargo, Inc. 

." .rr' /' 

cc: G, Brown, Attorney. fAA Sen Atty, Ak 
04/08/2010 14:04 FAX 2024935142 F/\/\ 	 .. OMS 002/002 

U. S. Deplil.l1ment 	 Alaskan Region 222 W. 7th Avem\o#14 .QfTnmsponation 	 Office ofttlc Regional Counsel Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587 

Federal Aviation .PH~ (901) 271-5271 

Administration FAX: (907) 271-2800 

Case No. 2009AL030119 

MAR - 2 2010 

CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Barton M. Tieman 


President, Bush Air Cargo, Inc. 


P.O. ])ox 93144 

Anchorage, AK 99509-3144 

FINAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY 

On December 16.2009, you were advised through a Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty that the 

FAA proposed to assess a civil penalty in the amount of$2800. 

After considering all the evidence in this matter, including the information presented in response 

to the Notice~ it appears that: 

1. 	 Bush Air Cargo Inc., (BAC) is now, and at all times referenced herein it was, the holde.r of an 

operating certificate and appropriate operations specifications authorizing it to conduct 

intrastate common carriage operations underpart 135 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

(FAR). 

2. 	 At all times referenced herein, BAC was authorized by its operations specifications to 

conduct its operations subject to part 135 ofthe FAR in civil aircraft N777YA, a Douglas 

Model DC-3C airplane. 

3. 	 At all times referenced herein, BAC was required by its operations specifications to use. 

Donald P. Ballard as the second in command in its operations subject to part 135 ofthe .FAR. 

4. 	 During the period from about February 21, 2009, through May 1,2009, BAC operated civil 

aircraft N777YA on some 19 flights in air commerce that were subject to part 135 of the 

FAR.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Perrachon, Chief Executive Officer of TouchTunes Music Corporation ("the
Company"), have reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and based on the inquiries I have
made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that for
the periods covered by the Report:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ JOHN PERRACHON
--------------------------
John Perrachon
Chief Executive Officer
May 20, 2003

THIS CERTIFICATE IS BEING MADE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE BY
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE COMPANY WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF SECTION
906, AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A PART OF THE REPORT OR FILED FOR ANY
OTHER PURPOSE.

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

                                       23
#### § 3598.2 Issuance of orders.

Orders and notices issued by the authorized officer shall be mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the operator/lessee at the address furnished in the exploration or mining plan. The operator/lessee shall notify the authorized officer of any change of address or operator/lessee name.
#### § 702.408 Evaluation of medical questions; impartial specialists.

In any case in which medical questions arise with respect to the appropriate diagnosis, extent, effect of, appropriate treatment, and the duration of any such care or treatment, for an injury covered by the Act, the Director, OWCP, through the district directors having jurisdiction, shall have the power to evaluate such questions by appointing one or more especially qualified physicians to examine the employee, or in the case of death to make such inquiry as may be appropriate to the facts and circumstances of the case. The physician or physicians, including appropriate consultants, should report their findings with respect to the questions raised as expeditiously as possible. Upon receipt of such report, action appropriate therewith shall be taken.
#### § 3206.15 How will BLM charge acreage holdings if the United States owns only a fractional interest in the geothermal resources in a lease?

Where the United States owns only a fractional interest in the geothermal resources of the lands in a lease, BLM will only charge you with the part owned by the United States as acreage holdings. For example, if you own 100 percent of record title in a 100 acre lease, and the United States owns 50 percent of the mineral estate, you are charged with 50 acres.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime ROBLES-ENRIQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40389.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jaime Robles-Enriquez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Robles-Enriquez has not filed a response to counsel’s motion.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 3864.1-2 Millsites applied for in conjunction with a lode claim.

Where the original survey includes a lode claim and also a millsite the lode claim should be described in the plat and field notes as “Sur. No. 37, A,” and the millsite as “Sur. No. 37, B,” or whatever may be its appropriate numerical designation; the course and distance from a corner of the millsite to a corner of the lode claim to be invariably given in such plat and field notes, and a copy of the plat and notice of application for patent must be conspicuously posted upon the millsite as well as upon the vein or lode claim for the statutory period of 60 days. In making the entry no separate receipt or certificate need be issued for the millsite, but the whole area of both lode and millsite will be embraced in one entry, the price being $5 for each acre and fractional part of an acre embraced by such lode and millsite claim.
[Graphic Omitted] Ahold

                                                      Press Release

                                                      Royal Ahold
                                                      Corporate Communications




                                               Date:  March 4, 2004
                               For more information:  +31 75 659 57 20



Ahold shareholders adopt all agenda items at extraordinary
meeting in The Hague



Zaandam, The Netherlands, March 4, 2004 - Ahold today announced that all agenda
items were adopted during its Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders in
The Hague held on March 3, 2004. This means the shareholders adopted each of the
following items:

o    proposal to amend the articles of association;
o    approval of terms and conditions of conversion rights of cumulative
     preferred financing shares;
o    adoption of the Corporate Executive Board's general remuneration policy.


Ahold Corporate Communications: +31.75.659.5720











                                                 Albert Heijnweg 1, Zaandam
                                                 P.O. Box 3050, 1500 HB Zaandam
                                                 The Netherlands
                                                 Phone: +31 (0)75 659 5720
                                                 Fax:   +31 (0)75 659 8302
http://www.ahold.com
§ 3271.14 What do I need to do to start building and testing a utilization facility if it is not located on Federal lands leased for geothermal resources? ( a ) You do not need a BLM permit to construct a facility located on either: ( 1 ) Private land; or
( 2 ) Lands where the surface is privately owned and BLM has leased the underlying Federal geothermal resources, when the facility will utilize Federal geothermal resources.
( b ) Before testing a utilization facility that is not located on Federal lands leased for geothermal resources, send us a Sundry Notice describing the testing schedule and the quantity of Federal geothermal resources you expect to be delivered to the facility during the testing. Do not start delivering Federal geothermal resources to the facility until we approve your Sundry Notice.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 137

 104

 110

 96

 96

 87

 80

 87

 90

 94

 94

 91

 89

 89

 88

 80

 81

 82

 84

 85

 80

 78

 80

 82

 70

 66

 64

 61

 64

 67

 105

 98

 95

 91

 85

 79

 77

 81

 86

 90

 90

 86

 84

 87

 80

 78

 78

 80

 81

 80

 77

 77

 74

 70

 66

 62

 59

 59

 61

 64

 122

 101

 102

 94

 89

 83

 78

 83

 88

 92

 92

 87

 86

 88

 82

 79

 79

 81

 82

 83

 79

 78

 76

 78

 68

 65

 61

 60

 63

 66

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 7, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 3,377

 3,382

 3,387

 3,380

 3,365

 3,346

 3,325

 3,311

 3,301

 3,294

 3,286

 3,269

 3,255

 3,248

 3,233

 3,210

 3,187

 3,164

 3,135

 3,096

 3,044

 2,994

 2,941

 2,888

 2,821

 2,753

 2,680

 2,606

 2,535

 2,465

 113

 113

 113

 113

 112

 112

 111

 110

 110

 110

 110

 109

 109

 108

 108

 107

 106

 105

 105

 103

 101

 100

 98

 96

 94

 92

 89

 87

 85

 82

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER