alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MANE-VU Class I States’ Consultation 

1) When – August 6, 2007 

2) Where – MRPO Offices, Chicago, Illinois 

*****Draft Agenda***** 

10:00 am States Caucus 

MANE-VU and 

MWRPO States & RPO 

staff 

10:30 am Welcome & Introductions 

- Goals for Today’s Meeting 

David Littell, ME DEP 

Chair, MANE-VU 

10:45 am Overview of June’s Open Technical Call & MANE-VU 

Consultation Briefing Book 

Anna Garcia, OTC 

11:00 am Summary of Reasonable Progress Work for MANE-VU 

Class I Areas 

- Proposed “ask” by the MANE-VU Class I States 

- Where the MANE-VU RPG is in 2018 based on the 

“ask” 

MANE-VU Class I State 

Representative 

11:20 am Clarifying Questions All Participants 

11:30 am Summary of Reasonable Progress Work for MWRPO 

Class I Areas 

- Proposed “ask” by MWRPO Class I States 

- Where the MWRPO RPGs are in 2018 

MWRPO Class I State 

Representative 

11:50 am Clarifying Questions All Participants 

12:00 pm Lunch 

1:00 pm EPA and FLM Perspectives on RPGs and Reasonable 

Measures Work 

EPA and FLM 

Representatives 

1:30 pm Roundtable Discussion on Reasonable Progress Goals 

and Reasonable Measures 

All Participants 

2:45 pm Preliminary Summary of Consultation Discussions 

- Areas with agreement 

- Areas with no agreement 

3:00 pm Next Steps 

3:15 pm End of Consultation
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# TIME AND DATE:

11:30 a.m., Tuesday, October 12, 2004.

# PLACE:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1.  Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2.  Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle A. Smith, Director, Office of Board Members; 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                         *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                         for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                    

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 1, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-22522 Filed 10-1-04; 3:59 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
### PART III—SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO TAXES ON TRANSPORTATION BY AIR

Sec.
4281.
Small aircraft on nonestablished lines.
4282.
Transportation by air for other members of affiliated group.
[4283.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11213(e)(2), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–436, struck out item 4283 "Reduction in aviation-related taxes in certain cases".

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–223, title IV, §405(c), Dec. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 1535, added item 4283.

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–258, title II, §205(a)(1), May 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 241, inserted "PART III—SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO TAXES ON TRANSPORTATION BY AIR."
# Diversions

# Costs
#### In the Matter of Fleetwood Acres, Inc., Appellant, against Christopher Sheridan, as Commissioner of Public Works of the City of Yonkers, et al., Respondents.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4774 

To amend the Clean Air Act to modify the ethanol waiver for Reid vapor 

pressure limitations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 4, 2022 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to modify the ethanol waiver 

for Reid vapor pressure limitations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ethanol Access for 

5 a Sustainable Economy Act of 2022’’ or the ‘‘EASE Act 

6 of 2022’’. 

7 SEC. 2. ETHANOL WAIVER. 

8 Section 211(h)(4) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 7545(h)(4)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4774 IS

1 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

2 by inserting ‘‘or more of’’ after ‘‘10 percent’’; and 

3 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘additional 

4 alcohol or’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Sacramento

River

CCOOLL UUSSAA CCOO

T16N R1W

T17N R1W

ilton Bend

0

5 4

9 8

3

32 33

6

29 28

7

31

10

30

95.8 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-2895A-R-1

Exhibit B

Griffin, Joseph, and Prater, Sharon

725-202-61

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 8, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\griffin_joseph_and_prater_sharon\griffin_joseph_and_prater_sharon.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
Exhibit 23.1

Internet Recreation, Inc.
24 Locust Street
Quitman, Arkansas 72131

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement of Internet Recreation,  Inc on Form SB-2 of our report dated July 26,
2001 on the financial statements of the company, as of May 31, 2001 and December
31, 2000 and for the five months and year then ended, respectively,  included in
the Company's 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.


                                               /s/ Durland & Company, CPAs, P.A.
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Durland & Company, CPAs, P.A.
Palm Beach, Florida
19 August 2002
#### Julius L. Goldstein, as Assignee of Independence Savings & Loan Association, Appellant, v. Bowen C. Edghill et al., Respondents.

*673In our opinion, the issues involved should not have been decided upon affidavits alone. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Natividad GONZALEZ-PARDO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41141.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, John Richard Berry, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Natividad Gonzalez-Pardo appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court sentenced Gonzalez to 15 months of imprisonment, based in part on a prior illegal reentry conviction.

Gonzalez contends that his sentence is illegal under *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because it was imposed pursuant to a mandatory application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Gonzalez thus alleges a “Fanfan” error. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463 (5th Cir.2005). In the district court, Gonzalez objected to his sentence under *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and the Government concedes that the issue is preserved and that it is subject to review for harmless error.

The Government has not carried its burden of showing beyond a reasonable doubt that the district court’s error did not affect Gonzalez’s sentence. *See Walters,*418 F.3d at 464; *United States v. Pineiro,*410 F.3d 282, 285-86 (5th Cir.2005). We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with *Booker. See Walters,*418 F.3d at 464; *Pineiro,*410 F.3d at 285-86.

Gonzalez also contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. Gonzalez’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Gonzalez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 *247S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Gonzalez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
§ 4.1044 How may a party use a deposition in the hearing? ( a ) *In general.* Subject to the provisions of this section, a party may use in the hearing any part or all of a deposition taken against any party who: ( 1 ) Was present or represented at the taking of the deposition; or
( 2 ) Had reasonable notice of the taking of the deposition.
( b ) *Admissibility.* ( 1 ) No part of a deposition will be included in the hearing record, unless received in evidence by the judge.
( 2 ) The judge will exclude from evidence any question and response to which an objection: ( i ) Was noted at the taking of the deposition; and
( ii ) Would have been sustained if the witness had been personally present and testifying at a hearing.
( 3 ) If a party offers only part of a deposition in evidence: ( i ) An adverse party may require the party to introduce any other part that ought in fairness to be considered with the part introduced; and
( ii ) Any other party may introduce any other parts.
( c ) *Video-recorded deposition.* If the deposition was video recorded and is admitted into evidence, relevant portions will be played during the hearing and transcribed into the record by the reporter.
§ 3809.552 What must my individual financial guarantee cover? ( a ) If you conduct operations under a notice or a plan of operations and you provide an individual financial guarantee, it must cover the estimated cost as if BLM were to contract with a third party to reclaim your operations according to the reclamation plan, including construction and maintenance costs for any treatment facilities necessary to meet Federal and State environmental standards. The financial guarantee must also cover any interim stabilization and infrastructure maintenance costs needed to maintain the area of operations in compliance with applicable environmental requirements while third-party contracts are developed and executed.
( b ) BLM will periodically review the estimated cost of reclamation and the adequacy of any funding mechanism established under paragraph (c) of this section and require increased coverage, if necessary.
( c ) When BLM identifies a need for it, you must establish a trust fund or other funding mechanism available to BLM to ensure the continuation of long-term treatment to achieve water quality standards and for other long term, post-mining maintenance requirements. The funding must be adequate to provide for construction, long-term operation, maintenance, or replacement of any treatment facilities and infrastructure, for as long as the treatment and facilities are needed after mine closure. BLM may identify the need for a trust fund or other funding mechanism during plan review or later.
#### Woodruff *v.*Columbus Investment Company.

September 30, 1910.

Complaint. Before Judge Gilbert. Muscogee superior court. March 6, 1909.

*William A. Little*and *James L. Willis,*for plaintiff.

*J. H. Martin, F. U. Garrard, W. C. Neill,*and *A. W. Gozart,*for defendant.

Atkinson, J.

1. If an unauthorized and illegal amendment to its charter has been accepted by a corporation and is about to be acted, upon, a stockholder who has not assented thereto or become estopped from complaining may bring an equitable proceeding to enjoin or set aside any action by the corporation under the amendment. 1 Cook on Stock and Stockholders (3d ed.), §§ 502, 503, pp. 638-41.

2. Rut where an amendment to a charter of a corporation was obtained and accepted, reducing the capital stock, and all of the stockholders (of whom.there were apparently many), save two, surrendered their shares upon the terms provided in the amendment, and received amounts of money and the lesser amounts of stock in accordance therewith; and ■where the corporation proceeded to do business upon the new basis for about a year, with the knowledge of one of the non-consenting stock-, holders, and a dividend of a certain per cent, was then declared, he could not recognize such a declaration and sue and recover the dividend, basing' the amount of his recovery upon the amount of his stock unreduced and the per cent, declared, while others were paid on the basis of the reduced stock, no proceeding having been instituted to set aside the illegal action complained of by him.

3. Under such a suit to recover the dividend so declared, the only question being as to the amount which the plaintiff was entitled to recover, there was no error in directing a verdict for the amount of dividend only on the reduced basis.

4. The rulings above made control the casé and render it unnecessary to discuss in detail other rulings of which complaint was made.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### §715a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Pub. L. 101–42, §3, June 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 91, which related to restoration of Federal recognition, rights, and privileges to the Coquille Tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Sacramento

River

T27N R3W

T26N R3W

TTEEHH AA MM AA CC OO

0

0

32

29

33

28

5

34

4

31

30

27

191.5

Contractor's Service Area

Points of Diversion

Contract No. 14-06-200-8106A-R-1

Exhibit B

Meyer Crest, LTD

725-202-142

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

Date: December 9, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\meyer_crest\meyer_crest.mxd

0 0.5 1

Miles
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                       5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from Ultronics Corporation March 31, 2000 financial statements
                  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such
                  financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                           0000894556
<NAME>                                          Ultronics Corporation
<CURRENCY>                                      US



<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.00

<CASH>                                                    13,112
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          13,112
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            13,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                7,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              13,112
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (536)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (536)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (536)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             .00



</TABLE>
§ 32.1 Introduction. ( a ) The Young Adult Conservation Corps (YACC) is authorized by title I of the Youth Employment and Demonstration Projects Act of 1977 (Pub. L. 95-93), which amends the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) of 1973 by adding a new title VIII.
( b ) The Young Adult Conservation Corps (YACC) is a year-round employment program for young men and women aged 16 through 23 inclusive. Financial assistance is available through grants-in-aid for employment and work to be performed on projects affecting both Federal and non-Federal public lands and waters or projects limited to non-Federal public lands and waters. YACC grants do not require matching.
( c ) The YACC grant program is jointly managed by the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture under an interagency agreement with the Secretary of Labor.
( d ) Thirty percent of the sums appropriated to carry out the YACC program for any fiscal year will be available for grants during such year. Grant funds will be allocated on the basis of the total youth population within each State. State YACC programs must consist of both residential and nonresidential projects. At least 25 percent of the State YACC program must be residential by September 30, 1978.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Brett
M. Clark, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of General Environmental Management, Inc. for the quarterly period ending
June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of General Environmental
Management, Inc. of Nevada.




Date:August 19,
      2009
                            
                            By:
                            /s/
      Brett M. ClarkBrett
      M. Clark,
                                Vice
      President of Finance,
                                Chief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21367]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Proposed Aircraft Conversion of the 167th Airlift Wing (AW) of 
West Virginia Air National Guard (ANG), Eastern West Virginia Regional 
Airport (EWVRA), Martinsburg, WV

ACTION: Record of Decision (ROD).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 3, 2004, the United States Air Force signed the 
ROD for the Proposed Aircraft Conversion of the 167th AW of West 
Virginia ANG, EWVRA, Martinsburg, West Virginia. The Department of the 
Air Force is issuing the ROD to convert from the existing transport 
fleet of C-130H aircraft used by the 167 AW of WV ANG to the larger C-5 
aircraft. The action that will be implemented consists of: (1) 
Conversion from the C-130H to the C-5 aircraft; (2) acquisition of land 
(approximately 135 acres) via lease; and (3) construction of facilities 
on the existing and acquired parcels. When implemented, this action 
will result in construction of new aircraft hangers and related 
maintenance and training facilities, lengthening of Runway 08/26, and 
closure of Runway 17/35.
    The decision was based on matters discussed in the ROD, the Final 
EIS, inputs from the public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant 
factors. The Final EIS was made available on July 30, 2004 in the 
Federal Register: (Volume 69, Number 146, Page 5708) with a waiting 
period ending August 30, 2004. The Air Force was the National 
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) lead agency with the Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA) acting as a Cooperating Agency under NEPA. The ROD 
documents only the decision of the Air Force with respect to the 
proposed Air Force actions analyzed in the Final EIS.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray Detig, Air National Guard 
Readiness Center/Civil Engineering Directorate, (301) 836-8120, or Pat 
Vokoun, Headquarters United States Air Force, (703) 604-5263.

Pamela D. Fitzgerald,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-21367 Filed 9-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
### §714c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 98–481, §5, Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2252, which related to governance of tribe by an Interim Council, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.