alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
•4

(All Programs Except D&MC)

CONHRMATION OF CONTRACT

The Contractor, afterthe execution ofthis contract, shall promptly seek to

secure a decree of a court of competent jurisdiction of the State of California, confirming

the execution of this contract. .The Contractorshall furnish the United States a certified

copy of the final decree, the validation proceedings, and all pertinent supporting records

of the court approving and confirming this contract, and decreeing and adjudging it to be

lawful, valid, and binding on the Contractor. This contract shall not be binding on the

United States until such final decree has been secured.

Approved 2/22/71; revised 11/84

Note: The article may be modified to accommodate the requirements of a

j,articular state. The confirmation article is required by Section 1 of the Act

of May 15, 1922, (42 Stat. 541), and Section 46 of the Omnibus Adjustment

Act of 1926 (44 Stat. 649). These acts require court confirmation of contract

before water is delivered or construction initiated.

Include in 9(d), 9(e), 9c(2), P.L. 130, P.L 984, R&B Not applicable in D&MC

Without election

M. 13
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22513]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[I.D. 100104E]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Gear-Marking Requirements for the Harbor Porpoise Take 
Reduction Plan.
    Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0357.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 21.
    Number of Respondents: 25.
    Average Hours Per Response: 1 minute.
    Needs and Uses: The Federal regulations at 50 CFR 229.34 limit the 
number of nets that can be used in certain fisheries in the mid-
Atlantic that appear to be most closely linked with accidental catch of 
harbor porpoises. Fishermen in these fisheries must obtain and attach 
numbered tags for their nets. Because the number of tags per vessel is 
capped, the tagging program helps to limit the number of nets in use 
and helps NOAA identify the number in use.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations; 
individuals or households.
    Frequency: Third party disclosure.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8de9c5f4e3e8e6cde9e2eea3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cbaf83b2a5aea08bafa4a8e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7f3d6c1ded3e8e5d8c4c3dcd2c5f7d8dad599d2d8c799d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d391c0b1419222f120e0916180f3d12101f5318120d531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 29, 2004.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-22513 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

----

|   | (1)    |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|   | (2)    |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                  Date: March 27,      2008 |   |                                                                       |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                         |   | /s/      Wilbert KnolWilbert      KnolInterim      Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

----

----
### §313. Width of rights-of-way

Such right of way shall not exceed fifty feet in width on each side of the center line of the road, except where there are heavy cuts and fills, when it shall not exceed one hundred feet in width on each side of the road, and may include grounds adjacent thereto for station buildings, depots, machine shops, sidetracks, turn-outs, and water stations, not to exceed two hundred feet in width by a length of three thousand feet, and not more than one station to be located within any one continuous length of ten miles of road.

(Mar. 2, 1899, ch. 374, §2, 30 Stat. 990; June 21, 1906, ch. 3504, 34 Stat. 330.)
### §726. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 23, 1954, ch. 831, §6, 68 Stat. 769, which related to applicability of Federal and State laws on and after the date of the proclamation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3280.1 What is the purpose and scope of this part? ( a ) The purpose of this part is to provide holders of Federal and non-Federal geothermal leases and owners of non-Federal mineral interests the opportunity to unite under a Federal geothermal unit agreement to explore for and develop geothermal resources in a manner that is necessary or advisable in the public interest.
( b ) These regulations identify: ( 1 ) The procedures a prospective unit operator must follow to receive BLM approval for unit area designation and a Federal geothermal unit agreement;
( 2 ) The operational requirements a unit operator must meet once the unit agreement is approved; and
( 3 ) The procedures BLM will follow in reviewing, approving, and administering a Federal geothermal unit agreement.
AIR-15-1983-E; AIR-15-1984-E 

July 16, 2015 

Mr. Charly Gaber 

Airworthiness & Certification Manager 

Gulfstream Aerospace LP 

P.O. Box 1036 

Airport City, Israel 7019900 

Dear Mr. Gaber: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your two requests for exemptions, 

and explains why we cannot process your requests for exemptions, from § 45.13(a)(1) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

You entered two petitions for exemption on May 26, 2015, on behalf of Gulfstream 

Aerospace LP (Gulfstream) into the public docket (Nos. FAA-2015-1927, FAA-2015-1932), 

but we are unable to process your requests any further. The relief that you are seeking is from 

the requirement to include the name of the builder on the aircraft identification plate on 

Gulfstream 150 and 280 models. 

Specifically, § 45.13(a)(1) requires the name of the aircraft builder on an identification plate 

as set forth in § 45.11(a). As noted in your petition, both the Gulfstream 150 and 280 are 

manufactured by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). While Gulfstream owns the type 

certificate for both aircraft models, Gulfstream does not have standing to petition for an 

exemption for either model 150 or 280. Since the State of Manufacture for these models is 

Israel, IAI is not subject to § 45.13(a)(1), except in the case of export to the United States. If 

IAI did not want to place the builders name on the identification plate when exporting to the 

United States, then IAI would need to petition the FAA for an exemption to § 45.13(a)(1). 
2 

In summary, Gulfstream, who may own the type certificate for the two aircraft models, does 

not have standing to petition for exemption in this case. In consideration of the forgoing, the 

FAA will take no further action on your two requests for an exemption from 

14 CFR § 45.13(a)(1), and will close the docket on both petitions. If you have any questions, 

you may call Robert Cook, Aviation Safety Inspector, at (202)-267-1575. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James M. Crotty 

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division 

Office of Rulemaking
ACCEPTED

01-15-00076-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/13/2015 9:46:34 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/13/2015 9:46:34 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
DISCUSSION TOPICS FOR CONFERENCE CALL

Finds and Recommendations Table

CVP Cost Allocation –April 11, 2014

1. Facilities Included

* Transmission facilities should be included in the costs to be allocated, Power SPA

costs, and Power separable costs

2. Capital Cost Evaluation: Methodology

* Indexing (vs. repricing) seems more straightforward

* In addition to indexing, historic costs (and benefits) need to be compounded to 2010 to 

reflect time of occurrence, in the same way that future costs and benefits expressed in 

2010 nominal dollars need to be present valued to 2010.

3. Flood Control: Benefits-Methodology, Benefits-Results, Facility-Sizing

* Benefits and SPA costs need to be compounded for time of occurrence

* SPA costs need to include not only construction costs, but also IDC and capitalized 

OM&R

4. Irrigation Water Supply, M&I Water Supply, and Refuse Water Supply: Benefits 

Methodology

* Before initiating these benefit studies, once the future and historic water deliveries are 

known, and the water supply SPA costs are known, as a time saving method, it may be 

desirable to undertake a quick analysis to determine what the water supply benefits per 

acre-ft. would need to be in order to exceed the SPA costs. Based on professional

judgment, if the benefits are clearly in excess of the SPA costs, there may be no reason to 

initiate any expensive, time-consuming benefits studies.

 

5. Irrigation Water Supply, M&I Water Supply, Refuge Water Supply: Facility Sizing

* Table should make clear that there is only one SPA for combined water supply, not 

individual SPAs for irrigation, M&I, and the refuges

* All the SPA's (including flood control and power) need to be sized to meet not only 

future benefits, but also historic benefits: the SPA question is not what would be built 
today to deliver future benefits but what would have been built in the past to deliver 

benefit levels for the entire period of analysis. That is why the SPAs are typically based 

on actual project facilities---what was built.

* The SPA sizing needs to not only reflect the "current regulatory environment", which 

presumably will be assumed to continue in the future, but also must reflect any sizing 

considerations related to historic environmental, releases, deliveries, etc.

6. Power: Benefits Methodology

* The future power market price approach is not necessarily a separate approach to the 

standard "with and without" approach, it is consistent with the "with and without" 

approach assuming that CVP power capacity/generation does not materially affect market 

price---which is being tested in the Proof of Concept Test.

* Any thoughts on how past power benefits might be estimated (if necessary), since 

presumably the PLEXOS model can not do this?
(February 21, 1949.)

#### Crawford Flushing Corporation et al., Respondents, v. Interboro Linen Mart, Inc., Appellant.

Present— Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ.
### §3212. Determination of compensation

The compensation of an employee representative for the purpose of ascertaining the tax thereon shall be determined in the same manner and with the same effect as if the employee organization by which such employee representative is employed were an employer as defined in section 3231(a).

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 432.)
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vision-Sciences, Inc. (the“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, RonHadani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James A. Tracy, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

 

(1)                    theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                    theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 12, 2004 |   | /s/ Ron Hadani          |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Ron Hadani              |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                     |   |                    |
|                     |   |                    |
| Dated: November 12, 2004 |   | /s/ James A. Tracy      |   |
|                     |   | James A. Tracy          |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                          |        |                         |        |  |

 

 

30

----
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–20 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1334, 

PROTECTION OF INCAPACITATED PERSONS ACT OF 2005 

MARCH 16, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 162] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 162, by a nonrecord vote, reports the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1334, the 

Protection of Incapacitated Persons Act of 2005, under a closed 

rule. The rule provides one hour of debate in the House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. The rule waives all points 

of order against consideration of the bill. 

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The Committee is not aware of any points of order against consideration of the bill. The waiver of all points of against consideration of the bill is prophylactic in nature. 

Æ
United States Department of the Interior 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 


Mid-Pacific Regional Office 


2800 Cottage Way 


Sacramento, CA 95825-1898 


IN REPLY REFER TO: 

MAR 1 6 2017 

MP-152 

ENV-7.00 

HAND DELNERY 

MEMORANDUM 

To: 	 Field Supervisor ~ 

Sacramento Fish and Wil I fe Office RrAttn: Jason Hanni (l ..:... 

From: 	 Anastasia T. Leigh 1 / r/), '

·~ 

Regional Environment~ r 

Subject: Withdrawal ofSection 7 Consultation for the 2017 Water Year ofthe Central Valley 

Project Long Term Water Transfers (20 15-2024) (Project) (Service reference 

08ESMF00-2015-F-O11 6) 

Reclamation was notified by participating water agencies that they have suspended activities 

associated with effecting water transfers under the subject Project in 20 17. Reclamation is now 

notifying the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that Project water transfers will not be made during 

the 2017 water year. Therefore, there is no need for an appended biological opinion and 

incidental take statement this year. 

If you have questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Mr. Dan Cordova at 


dcordova@usbr.gov or 916-978-5483. 


cc: MP-400 (BHubbard)
### §941k. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–116, §13, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1136, which related to acquisition or disposal of real estate outside the reservation by the tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §56. Quarters, fuel, and light for employees

The Secretary of the Interior, in his discretion, may allow quarters, fuel, and light to employees of the Indian Service whose compensation is not prescribed by law, the salaries of such employees to be fixed on this basis and the cost of providing quarters, fuel, and light to be paid from any funds which are applicable and available therefor: Provided, That this authorization shall be retroactive to the extent of approving any expenditures for such purposes authorized by the Secretary of the Interior prior to June 7, 1924.

(June 7, 1924, ch. 328, 43 Stat. 634.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
#### § 3284.11 Must the unit operator develop and operate on every lease or tract in the unit to comply with the obligations in the underlying leases or agreements?

The unit operator is not required to develop and operate on every lease or tract in the unit agreement to comply with the obligations in the underlying leases or agreement. The development and operation on any lands subject to a unit agreement is considered full performance of all obligations for development and operation for every separately owned lease or tract in the unit, regardless of whether there is development of any particular tract of the unit area.
§ 3425.1-4 Emergency leasing. ( a ) An emergency lease sale may be held in response to an application under this subpart if the applicant shows: ( 1 ) That the coal reserves applied for shall be mined as part of a mining operation that is producing coal on the date of the application, and either: ( i ) The Federal coal is needed within 3 years ( A ) to maintain an existing mining operation at its current average annual level of production on the date of application or
( B ) to supply coal for contracts signed prior to July 19, 1979, as substantiated by a complete copy of the supply or delivery contract, or both; or
( ii ) If the coal deposits are not leased, they would be bypassed in the reasonably foreseeable future, and if leased, some portion of the tract applied for would be used within 3 years; and
( 2 ) That the need for the coal deposits shall have resulted from circumstances that were either beyond the control of the applicant or could not have been reasonably foreseen and planned for in time to allow for consideration of leasing the tract under the provisions of § 3420.3 of this title.
( b ) The extent of any lease issued under this section shall not exceed 8 years of recoverable reserves at the rate of production under which the applicant qualified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. If the applicant qualifies under both paragraphs (a)(1) (A) and (B) of this section, the higher rate applies.
( c ) The authorized officer shall provide the Governor of the affected State(s) a notice of an emergency lease application when it is filed with the Bureau of Land Management.
[44 FR 42615, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33141, July 30, 1982; 48 FR 37655, Aug. 19, 1983]
#### § 3832.40 Tunnel sites.
### §1300c–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–468, §2, Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 782, which provided for the withholding of a portion of the judgment funds for expert witnesses or other programing needs in certain claims, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-21770-CIV-WILLIAMS

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INS. CO., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SUMMERS FIRE SPRINKLERS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’ Report

and Recommendation (DE 31) on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (DE 10; DE 17). 

Defendants filed objections to the Report. (DE 32; DE 33).

Having reviewed the Report, the record, Defendants’ objections, and the 

applicable law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report (DE 31) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (DE 10; DE 17) are DENIED as set forth in 

the Report.

3. Defendants shall answer the Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date 

of this Order. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 19th day of March, 2021.

Case 1:20-cv-21770-KMW Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2021 Page 1 of 1
### §1242. Losses on small business investment company stock

If—

(1) a loss is on stock in a small business investment company operating under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and

(2) such loss would (but for this section) be a loss from the sale or exchange of a capital asset,

then such loss shall be treated as an ordinary loss. For purposes of section 172 (relating to the net operating loss deduction) any amount of loss treated by reason of this section as an ordinary loss shall be treated as attributable to a trade or business of the taxpayer.

(Added Pub. L. 85–866, title I, §57(a), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1645; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(b)(3)(F), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1793.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Small Business Investment Act of 1958, referred to in cl. (1), is Pub. L. 85–699, Aug. 21, 1958, 72 Stat. 689, as amended, which is classified principally to chapter 14B (§661 et seq.) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 661 of Title 15 and Tables.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 substituted "an ordinary loss" for "a loss from the sale or exchange of property which is not a capital asset", each time appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–455 applicable with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1976, see section 1901(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to taxable years beginning after Sept. 2, 1958, see section 57(d) of Pub. L. 85–866, set out as an Effective Date of 1958 Amendment note under section 243 of this title.
### PART V—CLAIM OF RIGHT

Sec.
1341.
Computation of tax where taxpayer restores substantial amount held under claim of right.
[1342.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(b)(38), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1803, struck out item 1342 "Computation of tax where taxpayer recovers substantial amount held by another under claim of right".