alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7314

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD DAVID LASZCZYNSKI, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-95-13, CA-96-185) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 2, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard David Laszczynski, Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Stein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David D. Laszczynski, convicted on a guilty plea of escape, now appeals the district court’s adoption of the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), in which Laszczynski raised severalclaims relating to the waiver of his right to appeal, various sentencing claims, and ineffective assistance of counsel. On appealLaszczynski raises only one claim. Specifically, Laszczynski alleges that, in dismissing his direct appeal, this court erroneously held that his waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, voluntary, and enforceable. He admits that while he did waive his appellate rights to challenge his sentence in the plea agreement he signed, he claims that at the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, the district court led him to believe that he retained the right to appeal his sentence based upon the application of the sentencing guidelines to his case.We have previously considered and determined that Laszczynski’s plea was knowing and voluntary, and that his waiver was enforceable, and decline to reconsider this issue in this appeal. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Because this appeal presents no complex or substantialissue of law, we deny Laszczynski’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:20-cv-22051-JEM Document 17-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/09/2020 Page 1 of 1
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

CEDRIC LAVON MICKENS, JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-904 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 12, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Mark F. Carpanini, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
§ 3835.33 What should I include when I submit a notice of intent to hold? When you submit a notice of intent to hold as required in § 3835.31(d), you must include the following: ( a ) An exact legible reproduction or duplicate of a letter or other notice with signatures of one or more of the claimants or their agent that states your intention to hold the mining claims or sites for the calendar year in which the assessment year ends, and that you filed or will file a notice of intent to hold in the county where the claim is located;
( b ) If applicable: ( 1 ) A copy of a BLM decision granting a deferment of the annual assessment work;
( 2 ) A copy of a pending petition for deferment of the annual assessment work including the date you submitted the petition; or
( 3 ) Any other documentation in the notice of intent to hold supporting why you are filing a notice of intent to hold instead of an assessment work filing;
( c ) The name and, if available, the BLM serial number of the mining claim or site;
( d ) Any known changes in the mailing addresses of the claimants; and
( e ) A processing fee for each mining claim or site affected. (See the table of service charges and fees in § 3830.21 of this chapter.)
[68 FR 61064, Oct. 24, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 58879, Oct. 7, 2005]
Sacramento

River

T9N R3E

T10N R3E

Vin

Kiesel

Fremont

Beatrice

0

4

1

3

33

36

35

9

26 25

10

2

12

11.1 R

Contract No. 14-06-200-4520A-R-1

Exhibit B

Wilson Ranch Partnership

725-202-136

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 23, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\wilson_ranch_partnership\wilson_ranch_partnership.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
§ 3212.17 What information must I submit when I request that BLM suspend, reduce, or waive my royalty or rental? ( a ) Your request for suspension, reduction, or waiver of the royalty or rental must include all information BLM needs to determine if the lease can be operated under its current terms, including: ( 1 ) The type of reduction you seek;
( 2 ) The serial number of your lease;
( 3 ) The names and addresses of the lessee and operator;
( 4 ) The location and status of wells;
( 5 ) A summary of monthly production from your lease; and
( 6 ) A detailed statement of expenses and costs.
( b ) If you are applying for a royalty or rental reduction, suspension, or waiver, you must also provide to BLM a list of names of royalty and rental interest owners other than the United States, the amounts of royalties or payments out of production and rent paid to them, and every effort you have made to reduce these payments.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4893 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4893

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to require certain 
   disclosures by registrants regarding exemptions under the Foreign 
              Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lobbying Disclosure Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REGISTRANT DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN AGENT REGISTRATION 
              EXEMPTION.

    Section 4(b) of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 
1603(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) a statement as to whether the registrant is exempt 
        under section 3(h) of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 
        1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 613(h)).''.

            Passed the Senate December 14, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4893

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to require certain 
   disclosures by registrants regarding exemptions under the Foreign 
              Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended.
```
#### § 30.236 How are covered permanent improvements treated?

(a) In an intestate case, under the Act, an interest in a covered permanent improvement attached to a parcel of trust or restricted land is treated as shown in the following table:

| If . . . | then the covered permanent improvement passes to . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) A Tribal probate code approved under 25 CFR part 18 specifies how the covered permanent improvement will be handled | the person(s) designated in the Tribal probate code to receive it. |
| (2) A consolidation agreement approved under subpart F of this part specifies how the covered permanent improvement will be handled | the person(s) designated in the consolidation agreement to receive it. |
| (3) There is neither an approved Tribal probate code nor an approved consolidation agreement that specifies how the covered permanent improvement will be handled, but there is a renunciation of the trust or restricted interest in the parcel under subpart H of this part | the recipient of the trust or restricted interest in the parcel under the renunciation. |
| (4) There is neither an approved Tribal probate code nor an approved consolidation agreement that specifies how the covered permanent improvement will be handled, and there is no renunciation of the trust or restricted interest in the parcel under subpart H of this part | each eligible heir to whom the trust or restricted interest in the parcel descends. |

(b) In a testate case, under the Act, an interest in a covered permanent improvement attached to a parcel of trust or restricted land is treated as shown in the following table:

| If . . . | then the covered permanent improvement passes to . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (1) The will expressly states how the covered permanent improvement will be handled | the person(s) designated in the will to receive it. |
| (2) The will does not expressly state how the covered permanent improvement will be handled | the person(s) designated in the will to receive the trust or restricted interest in the parcel. |

(c) The provisions of the Act apply to a covered permanent improvement:

(1) Even though it is not held in trust; and

(2) Without altering or otherwise affecting its non-trust status.

(d) The judge's decision will specifically direct the distribution only of the decedent's trust or restricted property, and not any non-trust permanent improvement attached to a parcel of trust or restricted land. However, the judge:

(1) Will include in the decision a general statement of the substantive law of descent or devise of permanent improvements; and

(2) Can approve a consolidation agreement under subpart F of this part that includes a covered permanent improvement.

[76 FR 7507, Feb. 10, 2011]
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of General Motors Corporation (the
      "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean
      Yaakov Fulda _,
      Principal Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.





By /s/
      Sean Yaakov Fulda




Sean
      Yaakov Fulda


Principal
      Executive Officer


June
      30,
      2006
#### § 3715.8-1 What happens if I make false statements to BLM?

You are subject to arrest and trial before a United States District Court if, in any matter under this subpart, you knowingly and willfully falsify, conceal or cover up by any trick, scheme or device a material fact, or make any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or make or use any false writings or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry. If you are convicted, you will be fined not more than $250,000 or the alternative fine provided for in the applicable provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3571, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
San Mateo, CA
                                                                   July 14, 2000
                                                                   $175,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of one hundred  seventy-five  thousand  dollars  ($175,000),  with
interest  from the date hereof at a rate of ten percent  (10%) per annum,  which
amount shall be secured by all of the assets of Borrower.  Said principal  shall
be due and  payable on demand by Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,
but in no event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred  eighty (180)
days after the date of this Note.  This Note may be prepaid at any time  without
penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         2. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         3.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 14 day of July, 2000.

                                           Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                           By: __________________

                                           Title: ________________
San Mateo, CA
                                                                   May 12, 1999
                                                                   $125,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal  sum of one hundred  twenty-five  thousand  dollars  ($125,000),  with
interest  from the date hereof at a rate of ten percent  (10%) per annum,  which
amount shall be secured by all of the assets of Borrower.  Said principal  shall
be due and  payable on demand by Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,
but in no event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred  eighty (180)
days after the date of this Note.  This Note may be prepaid at any time  without
penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1. Subordination - Creditor subordinates to Business Finance ("BF") any
security  interest or lien that  Creditor  may have in any property of Borrower.
All Subordinated  Debt is subordinated in right of payment to all obligations of
Borrower to BF now existing or hereafter arising.

         2.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         3. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         4.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 12 day of May, 1999.

                                          Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                          By: __________________

                                          Title: ________________
§ 4.1303 Contents and service of petition. ( a ) An individual filing a petition for review of a notice of proposed individual civil penalty assessment shall provide— ( 1 ) A concise statement of the facts entitling the individual to relief;
( 2 ) A copy of the notice of proposed assessment;
( 3 ) A copy of the notice(s) of violation, order(s) or final decision(s) the corporate permittee is charged with failing or refusing to comply with that have been served on the individual by OSM; and
( 4 ) A statement whether the individual requests or waives the opportunity for an evidentiary hearing.
( b ) Copies of the petition shall be served in accordance with § 4.1109 (a) and (b) of this part.
[53 FR 8754, Mar. 17, 1988; 53 FR 10036, Mar. 28, 1988]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCOLD-SAT feasibility study safety analysisThe Cryogenic On-orbit Liquid Depot-Storage, Acquisition, and Transfer (COLD-SAT) satellite presents some unique safety issues. The feasibility study conducted at NASA-Lewis desired a systems safety program that would be involved from the initial design in order to eliminate and/or control the inherent hazards. Because of this, a hazards analysis method was needed that: (1) identified issues that needed to be addressed for a feasibility assessment; and (2) identified all potential hazards that would need to be controlled and/or eliminated during the detailed design phases. The developed analysis method is presented as well as the results generated for the COLD-SAT system.Document ID19910009854Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMchenry, Steven T.*(Analex Corp. Fairview Park, OH, United States)*Yost, James M.*(Analex Corp. Fairview Park, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187042NASA-CR-187042Accession Number91N19167Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-48-00CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-25515Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009854.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §1622. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 94–437, title IV, §404, as added Pub. L. 96–537, §6, Dec. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 3176, which related to grants to and contracts with tribal organizations, was transferred to section 1644 of this title.
### §5131. Packaging distilled spirits for industrial uses

#### (a) General

The Secretary may, at his discretion and under such regulations as he may prescribe, authorize a dealer (as defined in section 5121(c)) engaging in the business of supplying distilled spirits for industrial uses to package distilled spirits, on which the tax has been paid or determined, for such uses in containers of a capacity in excess of 1 wine gallon and not more than 5 wine gallons.

#### (b) Cross reference

**For provisions relating to containers of distilled spirits, see section 5206.**

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1343, §5116; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(a)(12), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 282; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §454(c)(3), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 821; renumbered §5131 and amended Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11125(b)(11), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1956.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5131 was renumbered section 5111 of this title.

Another prior section 5131, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 622, related to eligibility for drawback and rate of tax, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–59, §11125(b)(11), renumbered section 5116 of this title as this section and transferred section to this subpart so as to appear after subpart analysis.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–59, §11125(b)(11), inserted "(as defined in section 5121(c))" after "dealer".

1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–369 substituted "reference" for "references" in heading, struck out former par. (1) which provided a cross reference to section 5205(a)(1) of this title regarding stamps for immediate containers, and struck out designation "(2)" preceding provisions relating to containers of distilled spirits.

1979—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 96–39 substituted "section 5205(a)(1)" for "section 5205(a)(2)".

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–59 effective July 1, 2008, but inapplicable to taxes imposed for periods before such date, see section 11125(c) of Pub. L. 109–59, set out as a note under section 5002 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–369 effective July 1, 1985, see section 456(b) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5101 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 810 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.