alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AAM-13-004-E

10/31/2012

 Exemption No. 10652

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-1062

Mr. Brian Riley

RAI Jets, LLC

1 Airport Road

Sturgis, MI 49091

Dear Mr. Riley:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated September 28, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of RAI Jets, LLC (RAI Jets) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow RAI Jets to cover its 

safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to RAI Jets.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing 

programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of 

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was 

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.
2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant RAI Jets, LLC an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the 

extent necessary to allow RAI Jets to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and 

alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of RAI Jets are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of 

the RAI Jets part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
#### Stewart *v.*Mundy *et al.*

September 21, 1910.

. Claim. Before Judge Edwards. Polk superior court. May 10, 1909.

*W. H. Terrell*¡and *J. 8. Gleaton,*for plaintiff.

*John K. Davis, Bunn c& Bunn,*and *Mundy & Mundy,*contra.

Holden, J.

1. An attorney at law who signed his name as counsel for the plaintiff to a petition in a suit by the latter is not thereby estopped from assailing' the truth of the averments made in such petition, in a subsequent litigation wherein the attorney is a claimant of the property involved in. the former litigation and to which the plaintiff in fi. fa. in the claim case was not a party.

2. Where, upon the trial of a claim case, the plaintiff in li. fa. contended that the defendant in fi. fa. bargained for the land levied upon from the owner and obtained title from him and from his heirs at law after his death, and the claimants contended that they obtained title from such heirs at law, it was not error requiring a new trial to admit in evidence, in behalf of the claimants, a deed purporting to convey the land to such owner, over objection of the plaintiff' that neither title nor possession was shown in the one making such deed.

(a) Upon the trial of the claim ease the record of a suit for damages to the property brought by such heirs at law against a municipal corporation and a railroad company, and the verdict and judgment therein for the defendants, were not admissible in behalf of the plaintiff in fi. fa.'upon the ground that upon the trial of the claim case the claimants contended that the defendants in fi. fa., who bargained for the, land from the owner above referred to, had no equitable interest in or title to the property by reason of having- paid and tendered to the latter and his heirs at law all the purchase-money, and “one of the things pleaded and sought to be proven” by the railroad company in the suit for damages was that the plaintiffs therein had no right to recover, because “a complete equitable title was in” one of the defendants in fi. fa. by reason of payment and tender of the purchase-money to such owner and his heirs at law, and because when they bought the property the claimants had notice that there was a suit for damages to the property brought by the plaintiffs in the suit against the defendants therein, and that a verdict and judgment therein were rendered for the defendants.

3. In view of the entire charge, there was no error requiring a new trial in the charges complained of, nor in failing to charge as complained of in the absence of a written request to so charge. The evidence supported the verdict, and the court did not abuse his 'discretion in refusing a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 3503.10 Are all Federal lands available for leasing under this part? No. The Secretary of the Interior may not lease lands on any of the following Federal areas: ( a ) Land recommended for wilderness allocation by the surface managing agency;
( b ) Lands within BLM wilderness study areas;
( c ) Lands designated by Congress as wilderness areas; and
( d ) Lands within areas allocated for wilderness or further planning in Executive Communication 1504, Ninety-Sixth Congress (House Document Number 96-119), unless such lands are allocated to uses other than wilderness by a land and resource management plan or have been released to uses other than wilderness by an act of Congress.
#### Ashley T. Cole, Respondent, v. William M. Harris, Appellant.

Order granting new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See *Azzara*v. *Nassau Electric R. R. Co.,*134 App. Div. 167.) Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
all_density.xls 3/22/00 1:04 PM

Winter Run Loss - Not Clipped

2000

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1/15/00 1/20/00 1/25/00 1/30/00 2/4/00 2/9/00 2/14/00 2/19/00 2/24/00 2/29/00

Loss - Not Clipped

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Pumping X 100 af

SWP Loss CVP Loss SWP Pumping Total Pumping 3-Day Average Loss
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
              -----------------------------------------------------

                   CHASE CREDIT CARD OWNER TRUST SERIES 2001-2

             ------------------------------------------------------



         The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, as Administrator pursuant to the Indenture for the Chase
Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2001-2 does hereby certify that:

                  1. The undersigned is an Authorized Officer pursuant to the
                  Indenture to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
                  Indenture Trustee.

                  2. This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.9 of
                  the Indenture.

                  3. A review of the activities of the Issuer during the period
                  from the closing date until December 31, 2001, and of
                  performance under this Indenture has been made under the
                  supervision of the undersigned.

                  4. To the best of the undersigned knowledge, based on such
                  review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and
                  covenants in all material respects under this Indenture
                  throughout the period from the closing date until December 31,
                  2001. No default in the compliance of any such condition or
                  covenant has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in
                  paragraph 5 below.

                  5. The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Issuer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Indenture known to the undersigned to have been made
                  during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature
                  of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Issuer, if
                  any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
                  of each such default: NONE.


                                                  (signatures on following page)


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 25th day of March, 2002.

                                           By CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, National
                                           Association, as Administrator




                                           By:    /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
                                                  -------------------------
                                           Name:  Patricia M. Garvey
                                           Title: Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22089]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6656-2]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7167 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed September 20, 2004 through September 24, 2004
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 040455, Draft EIS, AFS, WA, Fish Passage and Aquatic Habitat 
Restoration at Hemlock Dam, Implementation, Gifford Pinchot National 
Forest, Mount Adams District, Skamania County, WA, Comment Period Ends: 
November 15, 2004, Contact: Bengt Coffin (509) 395-3425.
EIS No. 040456, Draft EIS, NRS, OR, Williamson River Delta Restoration 
Project, To Restore and Maintain the Ecological Functions of the Delta, 
Williamson River, Klamath County, OR, Comment Period Ends: November 15, 
2004, Contact: Kevin Conroy (541) 883-6924. Ext 115.
EIS No. 040457, Draft Supplement, AFS, AZ, NM, Southwestern Region 
Amendment of Forest Plans, Updated Information, Implementation, 
Standard and Guidelines for Northern Goshawk and Mexican Spotted Owl, 
AZ and NM, Comment Period Ends: November 15, 2004, Contact: Lou 
Wottering (505) 842-3898.
EIS No. 040458, Draft EIS, NIH, MD, National Institutes of Health (NIH) 
Master Plan 2003 Update, National Institutes of Health Main Campus, 
Bethesda, MD, Montgomery County, MD, Comment Period Ends: November 29, 
2004, Contact: Ron Wilson (301) 496-5037.
EIS No. 040459, Draft EIS, IBR, CA, Sacramento River Settlement 
Contractors (SRSR) To Renew the Settlement Contractors Long-Term 
Contract Renewal for 145 Contractors, Central Valley Project (CVP), 
Sacramento River, Shasta, Tehama, Butte, Glenn, Colusa, Sutter, Yolo, 
Sacramento, Portion of Placer and Solano Counties, CA, Comment Period 
Ends: November 15, 2004, Contact: Buford Holt (916) 989-7179.

    Dated: September 28, 2004.
Ken Mittelholtz,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 04-22089 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### § 3165.1-1 Relief from royalty and rental requirements.

Applications for any modification authorized by law of the royalty or rental requirements of a lease for lands of the United States shall be filed in the office of the authorized officer having jurisdiction of the lands. (For other regulations relating to royalty and rental relief, and suspension of operations and production, see part 3103 of this title.)

[48 FR 36586, Aug. 12, 1983, as amended at 53 FR 17365, May 16, 1988]
<PAGE>
 

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                (IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Quarter Ended        Three Quarters Ended
                                                             -------------------     --------------------
                                                             Oct. 1,     Oct. 6,     Oct. 1,      Oct. 6,
                                                              1995        1996        1995         1996
                                                             -------     -------     -------      -------
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>
Primary earnings per share:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding                 47,105      63,956      46,128       62,481
Dilutive effect of common stock options and warrants           3,758       3,460       3,567       3,610
                                                             -------     -------     -------      -------
Adjusted primary weighted average number of
  common and equivalent shares outstanding                    50,863      67,416      49,695       66,091
                                                             =======     =======     =======      =======
Fully diluted earnings per share:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding                 47,105      63,956      46,128       62,481
Dilutive effect of common stock options and warrants           3,870       3,591       3,682        3,649
                                                             -------     -------     -------      -------
Adjusted fully diluted weighted average number
  of common and equivalent shares outstanding                 50,975      67,547      49,810       66,130
                                                             =======     =======     =======      =======
</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCATLAC - Calibration and Validation Analysis Tool of Local Area Coverage for the SeaWiFS MissionCalibration and validation Analysis Tool of Local Area Coverage (CATLAC) is an analysis package for selecting and graphically displaying Earth and space targets for calibration and validation activities on a polar orbiting satellite. The package is written in the Interactive Data Language (IDL) and includes a graphical user interface. Although it is designed specifically for the Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) mission, the package can be used for analysis on other Earth-viewing missions. An individual can use text or graphical methods in CATLAC to select Earth targets to be scanned by a satellite. Additional onboard calibration activities (such as observations of the moon, or solar irradiance from a solar diffuser), which use data recorder time, can also be specified. All information pertinent to the creation of a command schedule can be written to a file which is read by a command scheduler. The scheduler can be invoked and the Local Area Coverage (LAC) recording periods can be visually verified using CATLAC. The schedule can also be verified by examining record and error files written by the scheduler.Document ID19940030763Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWoodward, Robert H.*(General Sciences Corp. Laurel, MD., United States)*Gregg, Watson W.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Patt, Frederick S.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1994Subject CategorySpace Communications, Spacecraft Communications, Command And TrackingReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:104603REPT-94B00079NASA-TM-104603Accession Number94N35269Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 970-00-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19940030763.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Robert H. Ritchason, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*William W. Lamont, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 72-141;

Fifth District —

July 24, 1973.

Elmer Jenkins and Jeff Troutt, both of Benton, for appellant.

Robert S. Hill, of Benton, for appellee.

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE EBERSPACHER

delivered the memorandum opinion of this court:

*72This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County, in a non-jury case in which the plaintiff-appellee was awarded $1000, pursuant to an oral contract for commission on the sale of real estate. Plaintiff’s testimony as to the existence of the contract is supported by the testimony of two other persons present at the transaction, while the defendant’s evidence consists of his denial of entering into a contract with the plaintiff.

An examination of the evidence reveals that the judgment is not against the manifest weight of the evidence or that the trial judge erred in believing the evidence of the plaintiff and not that of the defendant.

No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value.

Accordingly the judgment is affirmed in compliance with Supreme Court Rule 23. Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 100A, § 23.

Judgment affirmed.

G. MORAN and CREES, JJ., concur.
§ 3833.21 When may I amend a notice or certificate of location? ( a ) You may amend a notice or certificate of location if— ( 1 ) BLM recognizes the original location as a properly recorded and maintained mining claim or site; and
( 2 ) There are omissions or other defects in the original notice or certificate of location that you need to correct or clarify; or
( 3 ) You need to correct the legal land description of the claim or site, the mining claim name, or accurately describe the position of discovery or boundary monuments or similar items; or
( 4 ) You need to reposition the sidelines of your lode claim so that they are parallel to the discovered lode, ledge, or vein, if there are no intervening rights to the land; or
( 5 ) You are reducing the size of the mining claim or site.
( b ) You may not amend a notice or certificate of location to— ( 1 ) Transfer any interest or add owners;
( 2 ) Relocate or re-establish mining claims or sites you previously forfeited or BLM declared void for any reason;
( 3 ) Change the type of claim or site; or
( 4 ) Enlarge the size of the mining claim or site.
( c ) You may not amend legal descriptions of mining claims or sites after the land is closed to mineral entry, unless— ( 1 ) You are reducing the size of the mining claim or site;
( 2 ) You need to correct or clarify defects or omissions in the original notice or certificate of location;
( 3 ) You need to correct the legal land description of the claim or site, the mining claim name; or
( 4 ) You need to submit an accurate description of the position of discovery or boundary monuments or similar items.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 509 495 503

2 510 428 478

3 432 385 402

4 408 374 400

5 371 321 341

6 362 318 338

7 325 315 320

8 321 289 310

9 290 275 283

10 300 284 294

11 295 269 286

12 296 261 274

13 357 299 328

14 389 359 376

15 395 384 389

16 396 383 390

17 387 368 380

18 375 310 355

19 305 293 298

20 294 286 290

21 290 229 269

22 224 199 213

23 231 219 226

24 258 228 247

25 274 257 264

26 302 276 291

27 322 304 315

28 320 281 299

29 281 277 279

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Union Island On Old River At Middle River 

Run Date: 3/17/2024

February 2024
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Robert L. Gerry, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 11, 2009
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shannon West, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-114;

Second District

June 6, 1974.

William L. Balsley, of Loves Park, for appellant.

Philip G. Reinhard, State’s Attorney, of Rockford (James W. Jerz and Thomas Sullivan, both of Model District State’s Attorneys Office, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE SEIDENFELD.
#### § 2932.25 What will BLM do when I apply for a Special Recreation Permit?

BLM will inform you within 30 days after the filing date of your application if we must delay a decision on issuing the permit. An example of when this could happen is if we determine that we cannot complete required environmental assessments or consultations with other agencies within 180 days.