alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3400.0-3 Authority. ( a ) These regulations are issued under the authority of and to implement provisions of: ( 1 ) The Mineral Leasing Act of February 25, 1920, as amended (30 U.S.C. 181 *et seq.).*
( 2 ) The Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands of August 7, 1947, as amended (30 U.S.C. 351-359 *et seq.).*
( 3 ) The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, October 21, 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.).*
( 4 ) The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, August 3, 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1201 *et seq.).*
( 5 ) The Multiple Mineral Development Act of August 13, 1954 (30 U.S.C. 521-531 *et seq.).*
( 6 ) The Department of Energy Organization Act of August 4, 1977 (42 U.S.C. 7101 *et seq.).*
( 7 ) The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.).*
( 8 ) The Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act of 1976, as amended (90 Stat. 1083-1092).
( 9 ) The Act of October 30, 1978 (92 Stat. 2073-2075).
( b ) Specific citations of authority in subsequent subparts of this Group 3400 are to authorities from which the subpart is chiefly derived or which the subpart chiefly implements.
#### Mertins *v.*Pritchard.

February 14, 1911.

Complaint. From Eichmond superior court.

*Oarlington & Oozart,*and *Henry S. Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*O. H. Dunbar,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

1. There having been a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, a motion for a new trial by the defendant, and a judgment overruling the same, to which final judgment no exception was taken, the only exception being to the overruling of a demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition, and the bill of exceptions not having been certified or tendered for certification within the time prescribed by law after the decision complained of, no question is presented which this court has jurisdiction to consider, and the writ of error must be dismissed. *Fuller*v. *Stump,*99 *Ga.*316 (25 S. E. 649); *Morris*v. *Dougherty,*132 *Ga.*346 (63 S. E. 1114).

2. Exceptions pendente íite, although filed in due time in the trial court, can not be considered by this court when there is no exception to the final judgment rendered in the case. *Harrell*v. *Tift,*70 *Ga.*730; *Kibben*v. *Coastwise Dredging Co.,*120 *Ga.*899 (48 S. E. 330) ; *Simmons*v. *Scarborough,*129 *Ga.*125 (58 S. E. 1037). See, as to both points, *Lyndon*v. *Georgia Ry. etc. Co.,*129 *Ga.*353 (58 S. E. 1047).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concu/r.*
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Lake Bonneville: geology of southern Utah Valley, Utah

#### Professional Paper 257-B

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                
  (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp257B 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:55
#### § 3715.2-2 How do I justify occupancy by a caretaker or watchman?

If you assert the need for a watchman or caretaker to occupy the public lands to protect valuable or hazardous property, equipment, or workings, you must show that the need for the occupancy is both reasonably incident and continual. You must show that a watchman or caretaker is required to be present either whenever the operation is not active or whenever you or your workers are not present on the site.
GREAT AMERICAN FINANCIAL RESOURCES, INC.



EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002









In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Great American Financial Resources, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













|/s/ S. Craig LindnerS. Craig Lindner
Chief Executive Officer | /s/ Christopher P. MilianoChristopher P. Miliano
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



August 12, 2003



A signed original of this written statement will be retained by the Registrant

and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 3436.0-3 Authority. ( a ) These regulations are issued under the authority of the statutes cited in § 3400.0-3 of this title.
( b ) These regulations primarily implement section 510(b)(5) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1260(b)(5)).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 356

 340

 337

 325

 317

 333

 376

 401

 433

 468

 491

 501

 505

 516

 521

 522

 518

 520

 522

 515

 518

 513

 512

 515

 524

 530

 536

 538

 530

 531

 525

 306

 299

 287

 272

 268

 290

 329

 363

 397

 433

 460

 483

 485

 497

 502

 503

 504

 506

 502

 501

 503

 500

 489

 479

 498

 482

 516

 515

 514

 513

 506

 338

 321

 316

 302

 300

 309

 351

 380

 416

 449

 476

 490

 495

 504

 509

 510

 510

 510

 508

 507

 507

 505

 504

 507

 513

 515

 521

 522

 522

 522

 515

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 8, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### Garesmo Realty Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Constantino Gargiulo, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1958.]
### §5503. Submarginal lands of United States held in trust for Stockbridge Munsee Indian Community

All of the right, title, and interest of the United States in all the minerals including gas and oil underlying the submarginal lands declared to be held in trust for the Stockbridge Munsee Indian Community by the Act of October 9, 1972 (86 Stat. 795), are hereby declared to be held by the United States in trust for the Stockbridge Munsee Indian Community.

(Pub. L. 94–114, §3(a), Oct. 17, 1975, 89 Stat. 578.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of October 9, 1972, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 92–480, Oct. 9, 1972, 86 Stat. 795, which was not classified to the Code.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 3(a) of Pub. L. 94–114. Section 3(b) of Pub. L. 94–114 repealed section 2 of Pub. L. 92–480, which related to claims offset involving the Stockbridge Munsee Indian Community and was not classified to the Code. Section 3(c) of Pub. L. 94–114 amended section 5 of Pub. L. 92–488, which related to claims offset involving the Burns Indian Colony and was not classified to the Code.

Section was formerly classified to section 459b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 409

 415

 447

 447

 409

 398

 411

 429

 499

 479

 497

 506

 486

 487

 461

 458

 435

 428

 407

 407

 403

 383

 377

 399

 415

 398

 421

 393

 446

 419

 365

 364

 352

 349

 345

 340

 338

 327

 324

 317

 320

 324

 320

 318

 321

 309

 322

 321

 320

 327

 332

 319

 329

 330

 337

 336

 345

 347

 336

 346

 377

 376

 376

 372

 361

 357

 355

 350

 354

 354

 351

 349

 350

 347

 347

 337

 345

 346

 346

 347

 351

 345

 341

 347

 354

 357

 365

 364

 369

 365

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 15, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002








I, Brett
M. Clark, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10QSB of General Environmental Management, Inc. for the quarterly period
ending March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of General
Environmental Management, Inc. of Nevada.


Date:
      March 14,
      2008
              By:
              /s/ Brett
      M. ClarkBrett
      M. Clark
                Executive
      Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 5, 2018

No. 04-18-00216-CV

IN RE STEPHENS INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On April 4, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, an unopposed emergency 

motion to stay, and an unopposed motion to submit mandamus documents under seal. This court 

believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further 

consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may 

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this court no later than April 23, 2018. 

Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

Relator’s unopposed request to submit the 140 documents that are the subject of this 

mandamus proceeding under seal for possible in camera review by this court is GRANTED.

Relator’s unopposed request for a stay is GRANTED. The trial court’s March 14, 2018 

Order on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery from Stephens Inc. is STAYED pending final 

resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus.

It is so ORDERED on April 5, 2018.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________

 Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017-CI-05787, styled James E. Bennet, Jr., et al. v. Roy J. Moore, et al., 

pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the The Honorable Angelica Jimenez presiding.
EXHIBIT 32.

                Certifications Pursuant to U. S. C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial officer of Community Bankshares,  Inc., each hereby certifies that, to
the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form  10-Q of the  issuer  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of Sections  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

November 13, 2006


/s/ Samuel L. Erwin
-----------------------------------------
Samuel L. Erwin
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ William W. Traynham
-----------------------------------------
William W. Traynham
President and Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Terax Energy, Inc. (the
  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2006,
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), I, Lawrence Finn, Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
  the Company.

/s/ Lawrence J. FinnLawrence J. Finn 
  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) 
  and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: October 13, 2006

---
§ 4.908 What is the administrative record for my appeal if it is deemed decided? If your appeal is deemed decided under § 4.906, the record for your appeal consists of: ( a ) The record established in an appeal before the ONRR Director;
( b ) Any additional correspondence or submissions to the ONRR Director;
( c ) The ONRR Director's decision in an appeal;
( d ) Any pleadings or submissions to the IBLA; and
( e ) Any IBLA orders and decisions.
[64 FR 26259, May 13, 1999, as amended at 79 FR 62051, Oct. 16, 2014]
#### § 3815.6 Locations subject to mining laws.

Prospecting for minerals and the location of mining claims on lands in such withdrawals shall be subject to the provisions and conditions of the mining laws and the regulations thereunder.
#### § 3252.14 How must I complete a temperature gradient well?

Complete temperature gradient wells to allow for proper abandonment, and to prevent interzonal migration of fluids. Cap all tubing when not in use.
### §5202. Purchase of restricted Indian lands; preference to Secretary of the Interior; waiver of preference

Whenever any restricted Indian land or interests in land, other than sales or leases of oil, gas, or other minerals therein, are offered for sale, pursuant to the terms of this chapter or any other Act of Congress, the Secretary of the Interior shall have a preference right, in his discretion, to purchase the same for or in behalf of any other Indian or Indians of the same or any other tribe, at a fair valuation to be fixed by the appraisement satisfactory to the Indian owner or owners, or if offered for sale at auction said Secretary shall have a preference right, in his discretion, to purchase the same for or in behalf of any other Indian or Indians by meeting the highest bid otherwise offered therefor.

The preference right of the Secretary to purchase shall be considered as waived where notice of the pendency of sale is given in writing to the Superintendent of the Five Civilized Tribes for at least ten days prior to the date of sale and the Secretary does not within that time exercise the preferential right to purchase.

(June 26, 1936, ch. 831, §2, 49 Stat. 1967; Aug. 4, 1947, ch. 458, §10, 61 Stat. 734.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 502 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1947—Act Aug. 4, 1947, added second paragraph.
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of LitFunding Corp. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
David Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to LitFunding Corp., and will be retained by LitFunding Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ David Cohen
--------------------------
David Cohen
Chief Financial Officer
September 15, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 24, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. (“CableLabs”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notification                           ( print page 59268)                        were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.Specifically, Massillon Cable TV, Inc., Massillon, OH; and Community Rebroadcasting Service Association (CRRS TV), Labrador City, Newfoundland, CANADA have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and CableLabs intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 8, 1988, CableLabs filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 7, 1988 (53 FR 34593).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 21, 2004. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 23, 2004 (69 FR 44062).                

Dorothy B. Fountain, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-22164  Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
376 P.2d 54

#### Cecil Alvin PECE, Petitioner v. The FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SANTA FE, New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 3 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 23, 1962.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CPIAVEZ, MOISE and NOBLE, Justices, concurring.

. Ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied for the reason that counsel has been appointed by the District Court for petitioner.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

PATRICK OPUNUI Jr., 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 22-10129 

D.C. No. 1:20-cr-00122-DKW-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Derrick K. Watson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 14, 2023**

Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Patrick Opunui Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his 

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see United 

States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 20 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-10129 

Opunui contends that he is entitled to compassionate release because his preexisting medical conditions were exacerbated by a prior COVID-19 infection and 

the Bureau of Prisons has not provided—and is incapable of providing—adequate 

medical care. The record does not support this contention. Opunui did not show 

that his medical conditions were being inadequately managed by prison staff or

were exacerbated by his COVID-19 infection; indeed, he had been vaccinated 

against COVID-19, he was offered a booster, and he was asymptomatic when he 

was infected. On this record, the district did not abuse its discretion in concluding 

that Opunui lacked extraordinary and compelling reasons for release. See United 

States v. Robertson, 895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (a district court abuses its 

discretion only if its decision is illogical, implausible, or not supported by the 

record). 

Insofar as Opunui contends that the district court should have considered his 

post-sentencing rehabilitation, he has not shown what rehabilitative steps he has 

taken. Moreover, in light of Opunui’s offense conduct and criminal history, the 

district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

factors weighed against release.

AFFIRMED.