alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

www.spirelawfirm.com

Employment Attorneys

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION

BRANDON THOMPSON, 

Plaintiff,

v.

FORT LAUDERDALE LAW GROUP 

SOUTH, PLLC, a Florida Limited Liability 

Company,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 0:20-cv-60885

NOTICE OF FILING ERROR

The undersigned hereby provides notice that a corporate disclosure statement for a separate 

matter was filed for this lawsuit in error. (See Doc. 22). The undersigned respectfully requests the 

Court strike Docket Entry 22, as it is irrelevant to this matter.

DATED this 23rd day of June, 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

Spire Law, LLC

12249 Science Drive, Suite 155

Orlando, Florida 32826

By: s/Jesse I. Unruh

Jesse I. Unruh, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 93121

jesse@spirelawfirm.com

Attorney for Defendant

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

www.spirelawfirm.com

Employment Attorneys

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby Certify that on this 23rd day of June, 2020, the foregoing was electronically filed 

with the Court by using the Southern District of Florida’s CM/ECF portal, which will send a notice 

of electronic filing to: Noah E Storch, Esq. at noah@floridaovertimelawyer.com, RICHARD 

CELLER LEGAL, P.A., 10368 West State Road 84, Suite 103, Davie, Florida 33324.

/s/ Jesse Unruh

Jesse Unruh

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §565f. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–261, §2, Dec. 21, 2022, 136 Stat. 2393

Section, Pub. L. 89–224, §7, Oct 1, 1965, 79 Stat. 898, exempted funds distributed pursuant to this subchapter from Federal and State income taxes.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF MAX CAPITAL GROUP LTD.

This certification is
provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007 of Max Capital Group Ltd. (the
Issuer).

I, Joseph W. Roberts, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer certify that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: February 19, 2008



/s/ Joseph W. RobertsName: Joseph W. Roberts
- CtrSpecEx1SutterAtt6: Contractor SpecificSutter Exhibit 1, Attach. 6, 4-10-03
Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Cal Bay International, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Roger E. Pawson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/Roger E. Pawson

Roger E. Pawson

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 30, 2005
Exhibit 32.1 Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries Certification Of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Broadcast International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Rodney M. Tiede, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 13 , 2011 /s/ Rodney M. Tiede Rodney M. Tiede Chief Executive Officer      1
San Mateo, CA
                                                                   June 28, 1999
                                                                   $86,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of eighty-six  thousand dollars ($86,000),  with interest from the
date  hereof at a rate of ten percent  (10%) per annum,  which  amount  shall be
secured  by all of the  assets  of  Borrower.  Said  principal  shall be due and
payable on demand by  Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,  but in no
event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred eighty (180) days after
the date of this Note. This Note may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1. Subordination - Creditor subordinates to Business Finance ("BF") any
security  interest or lien that  Creditor  may have in any property of Borrower.
All Subordinated  Debt is subordinated in right of payment to all obligations of
Borrower to BF now existing or hereafter arising.

         2.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         3. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         4.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 28 day of June, 1999.

                                          Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                          By: __________________

                                          Title: ________________
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Generalized Weizsacker-Williams Method Applied to Pion Production in Proton-Proton CollisionsA new "Generalized" Weizsacker-Williams method (GWWM) is used to calculate approximate cross sections for relativistic peripheral proton-proton collisions. Instead of a mass less photon mediator, the method allows for the mediator to have mass for short range interactions. This method generalizes the Weizsacker-Williams method (WWM) from Coulomb interactions to GWWM for strong interactions. An elastic proton-proton cross section is calculated using GWWM with experimental data for the elastic p+p interaction, where the mass p+ is now the mediator. The resulting calculated cross sections is compared to existing data for the elastic proton-proton interaction. A good approximate fit is found between the data and the calculation.Document ID20020080719Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsAhern, Sean C.*(Wisconsin Univ. Milwaukee, WI United States)*Poyser, William J.*(Wisconsin Univ. Milwaukee, WI United States)*Norbury, John W.*(Wisconsin Univ. Milwaukee, WI United States)*Tripathi, R. K.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 2002Subject CategorySpace RadiationReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2002-211938L-18214NAS 1.60:211938Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC1-354PROJECT: RTOP 755-06-00-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020080719.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
376 P.2d 54

#### Harry D. SMITH, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of New Mexico et al., Respondents.

No. 5 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Nov. 8, 1962.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, MOISE and NOBLE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the request for free process be and the same is hereby granted and the petition for writ of habeas corpus be and the same is hereby denied for the reasons that the function of writ of habeas corpus is not to review the record for errors of the trial court and the petition states no facts showing petitioner is unlawfully deprived of his liberty.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCalculations of steady and transient channel flows with a time-accurate L-U factorization schemeCalculations of steady and unsteady, transonic, turbulent channel flows with a time accurate, lower-upper (L-U) factorization scheme are presented. The L-U factorization scheme is formally second-order accurate in time and space, and it is an extension of the steady state flow solver (RPLUS) used extensively to solve compressible flows. A time discretization method and the implementation of a consistent boundary condition specific to the L-U factorization scheme are also presented. The turbulence is described by the Baldwin-Lomax algebraic turbulence model. The present L-U scheme yields stable numerical results with the use of much smaller artificial dissipations than those used in the previous steady flow solver for steady and unsteady channel flows. The capability to solve time dependent flows is shown by solving very weakly excited and strongly excited, forced oscillatory, channel flows.Document ID19910021154Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKim, S.-W.*(Texas Univ. Arlington, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1991Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberE-6018NAS 1.26:187071NASA-CR-187071Accession Number91N30468Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC3-180PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910021154.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §2016. Recovery of taxes claimed as credit

If any tax claimed as a credit under section 2014 is recovered from any foreign country, the executor, or any other person or persons recovering such amount, shall give notice of such recovery to the Secretary at such time and in such manner as may be required by regulations prescribed by him, and the Secretary shall (despite the provisions of section 6501) redetermine the amount of the tax under this chapter and the amount, if any, of the tax due on such redetermination, shall be paid by the executor or such person or persons, as the case may be, on notice and demand. No interest shall be assessed or collected on any amount of tax due on any redetermination by the Secretary resulting from a refund to the executor of tax claimed as a credit under section 2014, for any period before the receipt of such refund, except to the extent interest was paid by the foreign country on such refund.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 380; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1902(a)(12)(C), 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1806, 1834; Pub. L. 107–16, title V, §532(c)(4), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 74; Pub. L. 107–147, title IV, §411(h), Mar. 9, 2002, 116 Stat. 46.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–147 struck out "any State, any possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia," after "any foreign country,".

2001—Pub. L. 107–16 struck out "2011 or" before "2014 is recovered".

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "Territory or" after "any State, any" and "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–147 effective as if included in the provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107–16, to which such amendment relates, see section 411(x) of Pub. L. 107–147, set out as a note under section 25B of this title.

#### Effective Date of 2001 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–16 applicable to estates of decedents dying, and generation-skipping transfers, after Dec. 31, 2004, see section 532(d) of Pub. L. 107–16, set out as a note under section 2012 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by section 1902(a)(12)(C) of Pub. L. 94–455 applicable to estates of decedents dying after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1902(c)(1) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 2012 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION

LOTTIE BARRIONUEVO,

 Plaintiff,

-vsHEALTHCARE REVENUE RECOVERY 

GROUP, LLC,

 Defendant.

/

CASE NO.: 0:20-CV-60954-WPD

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Lottie Barrionuevo, and the Defendant, Healthcare Revenue 

Recovery Group, L.L.C., and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate to 

dismiss, without prejudice, each claim and count therein asserted by Plaintiff against the 

Defendant in the above styled action, with Plaintiff and Defendant to bear their own attorney’s 

fees, costs and expenses.

Respectfully submitted this 21st day of July, 2020.

/s/ Jason R. Derry

Jason R. Derry 

Florida Bar No.: 0036970

Morgan & Morgan, Tampa, P.A.

201 North Franklin Street, 7th Floor

Tampa, FL 33602

Telephone: (813) 223-5505

Facsimile: (813) 257-0577

jderry@ForThePeople.com

jkneeland@ForThePeople.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III

Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III

Florida Bar No. 110108

Shepard, Smith, Kohlmyer & Hand, P.A.

2300 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 100

Maitland, Florida 32751

Telephone (407) 622-1772

Facsimile (407) 622-1884

Skohlmyer@shepardfirm.com 

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 0:20-cv-60954-WPD Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2020 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 21, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court by using the CM/ECF system and that a Notice of this filing will be sent to the 

following by operation of the Court’s Electronic Filing System: Ernest “Skip” H. Kohlmyer, III

2300 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 100 Maitland FL 32751 (skohlmyer@shepardfirm.com).

/s/ Jason R. Derry

Jason R. Derry

Florida Bar No.: 0036970

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 0:20-cv-60954-WPD Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2020 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                [BDO LETTERHEAD]

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No.  .
333-82617 of Venture Holdings Company LLC (formerly Venture Holdings Trust) of
our report dated December 18, 1998, except for the adjustments according to U.S.
GAAP (see Note 2), as to which the date is April 26, 1999, appearing in the
Prospectus, which is part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference
to us under the headings "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" and "Experts" in
such Prospectus.

Dusseldorf
October 21, 1999



BDO International GmbH
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft


/s/ F. Nehles        /s/ D. Rosenbaum
--------------       -----------------
Dr. F. Nehles        Dr. D. Rosenbaum
Wirtschaftsprufer    Wirtschaftsprufer
#### Hanover Estates, Inc., Respondent, v. Charles Finkelstein et al., Doing Business as Finkelstein Sewing Machine Co., et al., Appellants, et al., *708Defendants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present —■ Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
#### Central of Georgia Railway Company *v.*Cole.

August 13, 1910.

Damages. Before Judge Reagan. Monroe superior court. March 22, 1909.

*Hall & Cleveland, J. E. Hall,*and *Cabaniss & Willingham,*for plaintiff in error. *Persons*& *Persons,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

1. The requests to charge, in effect, instructed the jury that certain acts and conduct .on the part of the plaintiff would constitute negligence and prevent a recovery by him, and were properly refused.

2. Although a particular portion of the charge of the court excepted to, when considered by itself, may not have stated the rule of relative or contributory negligence with clearness and precision, yet as the general charge correctly instructed the jury on this subject, and' the -part to which exception was taken, when considered in connection with the whole, was not calculated to mislead the jury or to injure the excepting party, no cause for a new trial existed in consequence of the instruction alleged to be erroneous.

3. The verdict was supported by tlie evidence, and there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*
Exhibit 10.1

LOGO

BUCYRUS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Effective April 1, 2009

The Board approved an annual cash retainer fee to be paid to our non-employee directors of $55,000, with fees payable in advance on a quarterly basis. The Board also
approved an additional annual cash retainer fee paid to our Chairman of the Board of $10,000, payable in advance on a quarterly basis. The Board approved an annual retainer fee paid to our non-employee directors of $75,000 worth of our Common Stock,
with the stock to be granted at each annual stockholders meeting or upon initial election or new appointment to our Board (with a prorated stock grant being made for non-employee directors whose initial election or new appointment occurs on or
after July 1 of any year). Any shares of Common Stock will be issued pursuant to the Omnibus Incentive Plan 2007.

Non-employee directors also receive
$1,500 per Board and committee meeting attended. Board committee chairpersons receive an additional fee of $1,000 per committee meeting. We reimburse all directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and
committee meetings.

Non-employee directors may elect to receive the annual cash retainer, Board meeting fees and committee meeting fees in the form of
cash or shares of Company stock.

Non-employee directors are also eligible to participate in the Bucyrus International, Inc. Nonqualified Non-Employee
Directors Deferred Compensation Program.
### **CHAPTER 80—GENERAL RULES**

Subchapter
Sec. 1
A.
Application of internal revenue laws
7801

B.
Effective date and related provisions
7851
C.
Provisions affecting more than one subtitle
7871

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
### PART I—CORPORATIONS IMPROPERLY ACCUMULATING SURPLUS

Sec.
531.
Imposition of accumulated earnings tax.
532.
Corporations subject to accumulated earnings tax.
533.
Evidence of purpose to avoid income tax.
534.
Burden of proof.
535.
Accumulated taxable income.
536.
Income not placed on annual basis.
537.
Reasonable needs of the business.
#### Maurice DONIKIN-EL, a/k/a Maurice Donikin, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-7538.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 2006.

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*154Maurice Donikin-El, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Donikin-El, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) as an unauthorized second or successive petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *Jones v. Braxton,*392 F.3d 683 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Donikin-El has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*