alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statments for the nine months ended September 30, 1999,
and is qualfied in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          31,250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,250
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,250
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,561
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,561)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,561)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,561)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Melvin Withrow, Defendant-Appellant, *v.*Bowen Walker, Plaintiff-Appellee.

(No. 73-203;

Fifth District

June 4, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

CREBS, J., took no part.

*5Charles W. Phillips, of Ridgway, for appellant.

Alton A. Greer, of Junction, for appellee.
#### § 4.451 Government contests.
No. 14,638.

#### Ronce et al. *v.*Favre et al.

(103 P. [2d] 26)

Decided May 20, 1940.

Rehearing denied June 10, 1940.

Mr. Allyn Cole, Mr. Hume S. White, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Frank Delaney, for defendants in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Burke

delivered the opinion of the court.

These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court and are hereinafter referred to as there.

Plaintiffs, claiming the right to the use, for domestic purposes, of “two statutory inches of water” arising from springs on defendants’ lands, sought to lay a pipeline for the conveyance thereof. The course of this line *222was across lands of defendants to a highway (which also crossed defendants’ lands and to the use of which for such purpose they claimed a right by virtue of a license from the county commissioners), thence along said highway to a point where the line branched to plaintiffs’ several residences. Defendants forcibly excluded them whereupon they brought injunction. The defenses included, inter alia, denial of plaintiffs’ ownership of the water and the right of way, denial of the county board’s right to issue the license, allegations of defendants’ title by adverse possession and by virtue of being innocent purchasers for value; also laches, abandonment, and certain statutes of limitation. By way of counterclaim defendants sought to quiet their title against plaintiffs’ claims. Trial was to the court which held the evidence insufficient to support either the writ or counterclaim and dismissed the action at plaintiffs’ costs. To review that judgment the latter brings error.

It is insisted that the six assignments are so general as to be ineffective. This may be true of all but one. The third however squarely presents the question of the sufficiency of the evidence and nothing further is here essential.

If unobstructed, the water in question would flow into Blue Creek from which defendants, through the Harris Ditch, irrigate a portion of their lands. From Blue Creek this water flows info the Roaring Fork. The highway in question has become such by prescription. We find no occasion to here follow in detail the ramifications of plaintiffs’ alleged claim of title, the doubtful and equivocal grants'therein, to decide where the alleged right of way, if it exists, is located, to resolve the numerous and technical defenses, to decide whether plaintiffs have title, and if so to what, or whether the commissioners could grant the alleged easement, or if not who could, and if anyone could whether they have, or are estopped. All these questions are presented by the record, are heretofore unadjudicated, and are in*223volved in grave doubt. It is well settled in this jurisdiction that the adjudication of such mooted claims and their protection is not the function of injunction. *Barrios v. Pleasant Valley Co.,*91 Colo. 563, 17 P. (2d) 1119; *French v. Mitchell, 92*Colo. 532, 22 P. (2d) 644; *Modrell v. Crews,*100 Colo. 415, 67 P. (2d) 1036.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Mr. Justice Knous and Mr. Justice Otto Bock concur.
#### § 233.1 When reduction must be made.

On or before August 31 of each fiscal year, the Board shall, in accordance with this section, determine the amount of the reduction, if any that will have to be made in the following fiscal year in the amount of the windfall benefit components of persons entitled to such benefit components under the Railroad Retirement Act. A reduction must be made where it is determined that the balance in the Dual Benefits Payments Account, comprised of such funds as will be available for the payment of windfall benefits in the following fiscal year including the enacted or estimated appropriation to the Account for the next succeeding fiscal year, disregarding any interest which may be earned by the moneys in the Account during the next fiscal year, is less than the estimate of the amount of the windfall benefits that would be payable under the Railroad Retirement Act during such fiscal year if no reduction were to be applicable. The amount of the windfall benefit as determined by the Board and paid to a person under this section shall constitute full and complete payment of the person's windfall component and there shall be no further liability on the part of the Board, the U.S. Government, or any other person or entity for the amount of any reduction imposed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,962,492               1,302,984
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,429,560               4,946,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                   232,440                 168,710
<INVENTORY>                                  1,523,948               3,119,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,351,282              10,861,643
<PP&E>                                       1,770,768               1,749,268
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,310,184               1,112,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0              13,021,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0               6,180,319
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                   6,264
<OTHER-SE>                                           0               6,834,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0              13,021,393
<SALES>                                      7,844,285              16,312,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,844,285              16,312,324
<CGS>                                        6,955,669              12,102,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,955,669              12,102,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,367,165               6,953,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (13,610)                 303,215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0             (3,046,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0               (959,570)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,058,009)             (2,086,684)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)                   (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)                   (.36)
        


</TABLE>
#### § 4.816 Notice of hearing and response thereto.

A notice of hearing shall fix a date not less than 30 days from the date of service of the notice of a hearing on matters alleged in the notice. If the applicant recipient does not desire a hearing, he should so state in writing, in which case the applicant or recipient shall have the right to further participate in the proceeding. Failure to appear at the time set for a hearing, without good cause, shall be deemed a waiver of the right to a hearing under section 602 of the Act and the regulations thereunder and consent to the making of a decision on such information as is available which may be presented for the record.
Fw: CASAC comments on Dudley memo

Tricia Crabtree to: Tricia Crabtree 01/06/2010 10:39 AM

Tricia Crabtree

Environmental Protection Specialist

EPA/OAQPS/HEID/OD (C504-02)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: 919-541-5688 Fax: 919-685-3148

E-Mail: Crabtree.Tricia@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/06/2010 10:39 AM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: dmancini@omb.eop.gov, hking@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/29/2009 11:01 AM

Subject: CASAC comments on Dudley memo

Dom,

I just talked with Karen and we do need to make an edit to address CASAC's reference to the Dudley 

memo. We had missed that reference. We will make that change and send it along with the next revision 

we send to you, which will address the other issues we discussed today. 

Lydia
### §3308. Instrumentalities of the United States

Notwithstanding any other provision of law (whether enacted before or after the enactment of this section) which grants to any instrumentality of the United States an exemption from taxation, such instrumentality shall not be exempt from the tax imposed by section 3301 unless such other provision of law grants a specific exemption, by reference to section 3301 (or the corresponding section of prior law), from the tax imposed by such section.

(Added Pub. L. 86–778, title V, §531(d)(1), Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 983.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Enacted before or after the enactment of this section, referred to in text, means enacted before or after Sept. 13, 1960, the date of approval of Pub. L. 86–778.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3309 was renumbered section 3311 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to remuneration paid after 1961 for services performed after 1961, see section 535 of Pub. L. 86–778, set out as an Effective Date of 1960 Amendment note under section 3305 of this title.

#### Applicability to Federal Land Banks, Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, and Banks for Cooperatives

Applicability of this section to Federal land banks, Federal intermediate credit banks, and banks for cooperatives, see section 531(g) of Pub. L. 86–778, set out as a note under section 3305 of this title.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

 No. 06-3870

___________

Larry Coffman; *

*

Appellant, *

*

Theodore Ginnery, *

*

Plaintiff, * Appeals from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri

*

Linda Meade; Jay Englehart; Alan * [UNPUBLISHED]

Blake; John Rosenboom, Dr., *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 No. 07-1040

___________

Larry Coffman; Theodore Ginnery, *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. *

*

Linda Meade; Jay Englehart; Alan *

Blake; John Rosenboom, Dr., *

*

Appellees. *
1

We find that Theodore Ginnery is not a party to the instant appeals. See

Scarrella v. Midwest Fed. Sav. & Loan, 536 F.2d 1207, 1209 (8th Cir. 1976) (per

curiam).

2

The Honorable Thomas C. Mummert, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

-2-

 ___________

Submitted: March 5, 2008

Filed: March 10, 2008

___________

Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated matters, Larry Coffman1

 appeals following the district

court’s2

 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. Having

conducted de novo review of the record, see Senty-Haugen v. Goodno, 462 F.3d 876,

880, 885, 890-91 (8th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 2048 (2007), we agree with

the district court that there were no disputed issues of material fact and defendants

were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________
### §1287. Denial of capital gain treatment for gains on certain obligations not in registered form

#### (a) In general

If any registration-required obligation is not in registered form, any gain on the sale or other disposition of such obligation shall be treated as ordinary income (unless the issuance of such obligation was subject to tax under section 4701).

#### (b) Definitions

For purposes of subsection (a)—

#### (1) Registration-required obligation

The term "registration-required obligation" has the meaning given to such term by section 163(f)(2).

#### (2) Registered form

The term "registered form" has the same meaning as when used in section 163(f).

(Added Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §41(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 552; amended Pub. L. 111–147, title V, §502(a)(2)(D), Mar. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 107.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 111–147 struck out "except that clause (iv) of subparagraph (A), and subparagraph (B), of such section shall not apply" before period.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–147 applicable to obligations issued after the date which is 2 years after Mar. 18, 2010, see section 502(f) of Pub. L. 111–147, set out as a note under section 149 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to taxable years ending after July 18, 1984, except as otherwise provided, see section 44 of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 1271 of this title.
### PART II—NONRESIDENT ALIENS AND FOREIGN CORPORATIONS

Subpart
A.
Nonresident alien individuals.
B.
Foreign corporations.
C.
Tax on gross transportation income.
D.
Miscellaneous provisions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XII, §1212(b)(2), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2538, added item for subpart C and redesignated item for former subpart C as D.
# Iris Oifigiúil C 249I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | C 249I |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 6329 Iúil 2020 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

C 249I

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

6329 Iúil 2020

---

| Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Fógraí |
| | FÓGRAÍ Ó INSTITIÚIDÍ, Ó CHOMHLACHTAÍ, Ó OIFIGÍ, AGUS Ó GHNÍOMHAIREACHTAÍ AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH |
| | An Chomhairle |
| 2020/C 249 I/01 | Glacadh Leasuithe ar Rialacha Nós Imeachta Eurojust | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

IV   Fógraí

FÓGRAÍ Ó INSTITIÚIDÍ, Ó CHOMHLACHTAÍ, Ó OIFIGÍ, AGUS Ó GHNÍOMHAIREACHTAÍ AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH

An Chomhairle

2020/C 249 I/01

Glacadh Leasuithe ar Rialacha Nós Imeachta Eurojust

1

---

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

IV Fógraí

FÓGRAÍ Ó INSTITIÚIDÍ, Ó CHOMHLACHTAÍ, Ó OIFIGÍ, AGUS Ó GHNÍOMHAIREACHTAÍ AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH

An Chomhairle

| 29.7.2020 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | CI 249/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2020

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

CI 249/1

---

Glacadh Leasuithe ar Rialacha Nós Imeachta Eurojust

(2020/C 249 I/01)

Ghlac Coláiste Eurojust an 24 Iúil 2020 leasuithe ar Rialacha Nós Imeachta Eurojust (1). Tá na leasuithe sin i gceangal le Cinneadh Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2020/1114 ón gComhairle an 23 Iúil 2020 (2).

Thar ceann Choláiste Eurojust,

Ladislav HAMRAN

Uachtarán Eurojust

---

(1)  Arna bhformheas ag an gComhairle le Cinneadh Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2019/2250 ón gComhairle an 19 Nollaig 2019 (IO L 336, 30.12.2019, lch. 309) agus arna nglacadh ag an gColáiste an 20 Nollaig 2019 (IO L 50, 24.2.2020, lch. 1.).

1

(2)  IO L 244, 29.7.2020, lch. 13.

2

---
### PART II—ACCURACY-RELATED AND FRAUD PENALTIES

Sec.
6662.
Imposition of accuracy-related penalty on underpayments.
6662A.
Imposition of accuracy-related penalty on understatements with respect to reportable transactions.
6663.
Imposition of fraud penalty.
6664.
Definitions and special rules.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §812(e)(2), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1580, added items 6662 and 6662A and struck out former item 6662 "Imposition of accuracy-related penalty".

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7721(a), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2395, added part heading and analysis of sections.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     452,732
<SECURITIES>                                             1,993,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                              114,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         2,592,288
<PP&E>                                                   1,387,259
<DEPRECIATION>                                             580,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           4,864,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,028,460
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                     77
<COMMON>                                                    22,491
<OTHER-SE>                                               3,479,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             4,864,164
<SALES>                                                    140,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           140,363
<CGS>                                                      222,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              222,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         1,695,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          24,264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (1,774,666)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (1,774,666)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (1,774,666)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.96)


</TABLE>
#### § 3190.0-1 Purpose.

The purpose of the part is to provide procedures for approval, implementation and administration of delegations of authority, cooperative agreements and contracts for inspection, enforcement and investigative activities related to oil and gas production operations on Federal and Indian lands under the provisions of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 (30 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*).
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-2013 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-096-AD

Helicopter Model: AgustaWestland Model A109S, AW109SP, A119 and AW119 MKII

Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 91Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this proposed AD are intended to prevent fractures on the rod end 

assemblies, which could damage the main rotor assembly and lead to loss of control of the 

helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $3,918

Labor per Helicopter

(1.5 work-hours x $85/workhour to replace the rod end 

assembly)

$128

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $4,046

Total US Fleet Cost $368,186

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Robert Grant
CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB of
Wisedriver.com, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2003, I, Joshua Berger,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisedriver.com, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   Such Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
          2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the
          year ended December 31, 2003, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Wisedriver.com, Inc.

Dated:    October 12, 2004

Wisedriver.com,, Inc.

By:  /s/ Joshua Berger
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
§ 30.132 May I appeal the judge's or ADM's recusal decision? ( a ) If you have filed a motion seeking disqualification of a judge or ADM under § 4.27(c)(2) of this title and the judge or ADM denies the motion, you may seek immediate review of the denial by filing a request with the Chief ALJ under § 4.27(c)(3) of this title.
( b ) If a judge or ADM recuses himself from a probate case, you may not seek review of the recusal.