alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1393. Definitions and special rules

#### (a) In general

For purposes of this subchapter—

#### (1) Appropriate Secretary

The term "appropriate Secretary" means—

(A) the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development in the case of any nominated area which is located in an urban area, and

(B) the Secretary of Agriculture in the case of any nominated area which is located in a rural area.

#### (2) Rural area

The term "rural area" means any area which is—

(A) outside of a metropolitan statistical area (within the meaning of section 143(k)(2)(B)), or

(B) determined by the Secretary of Agriculture, after consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, to be a rural area.

#### (3) Urban area

The term "urban area" means an area which is not a rural area.

#### (4) Special rules for Indian reservations

#### (A) In general

No empowerment zone or enterprise community may include any area within an Indian reservation.

#### (B) Indian reservation defined

The term "Indian reservation" has the meaning given such term by section 168(j)(6).

#### (5) Local government

The term "local government" means—

(A) any county, city, town, township, parish, village, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State, and

(B) any combination of political subdivisions described in subparagraph (A) recognized by the appropriate Secretary.

#### (6) Nominated area

The term "nominated area" means an area which is nominated by 1 or more local governments and the State or States in which it is located for designation under section 1391.

#### (7) Governments

If more than 1 State or local government seeks to nominate an area under this part, any reference to, or requirement of, this subchapter shall apply to all such governments.

#### (8) Special rule

An area shall be treated as nominated by a State and a local government if it is nominated by an economic development corporation chartered by the State.

#### (9) Use of census data

Population and poverty rate shall be determined by the most recent decennial census data available.

#### (b) Empowerment zone; enterprise community

For purposes of this title, the terms "empowerment zone" and "enterprise community" mean areas designated as such under section 1391.

(Added Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13301(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 547.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1393, added Pub. L. 95–600, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2894; amended Pub. L. 96–595, §3(a)(5), (6), (8), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3465, related to taxation of general stock ownership corporation taxable income to shareholders, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–514, title XIII, §1303(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2658.
/~CC 

Clothes Washer Workshop 

July 22, 1999 
Clothes Washer Workshop 

Purpose of Workshop: 

• Discuss test procedure issues and .develop plan of action. 

• Discuss consumer and shipment analysis. 
Clothes Washer Workshop 

Outcomes of Workshop: 

• Discuss plan of action to resolve test procedure issues. 

• Better understand analysis to date. 

• Set schedule for next workshop. 
r •i • 

Clothes Washer Workshop 

DOE is committed to: 

•Resolving the test procedure issue quickly. 

• Keeping the rulemaking on schedule. 

• Sharing new information as it becomes available. 

•Communicating early and often. 
Clothes Washer Workshop 

DOE needs you to: 

• Support the action plan to resolve the test procedure 

issues quickly. 

• Retest the products to verify the recommended test 

procedure changes, if necessary. 

• Provide updated cost data as warranted. 

• Continue open communications.
### §337. Allotments in national forests

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to make allotments within the national forests in conformity with the general allotment laws, to any Indian occupying, living on, or having improvements on land included within any such national forest who is not entitled to an allotment on any existing Indian reservation, or for whose tribe no reservation has been provided, or whose reservation was not sufficient to afford an allotment to each member thereof. All applications for allotments under the provisions of this section shall be submitted to the Secretary of Agriculture who shall determine whether the lands applied for are more valuable for agricultural or grazing purposes than for the timber found thereon; and if it be found that the lands applied for are more valuable for agricultural or grazing purposes, then the Secretary of the Interior shall cause allotment to be made as herein provided.

(June 25, 1910, ch. 431, §31, 36 Stat. 863.)
### **Subchapter A—Tax on Employees**

Sec.
3201.
Rate of tax.
3202.
Deduction of tax from compensation.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANTS



|                                             |  |                          
|-------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Subsidiary                                   |  | Jurisdiction of Formation
|Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc. |  | Delaware                 
|Resorts Finance Holdings, Inc.               |  | Delaware                 
|Resorts Real Estate Holdings, Inc.           |  | New Jersey               
|Resorts International Hotel, Inc.            |  | New Jersey               
|New Pier Operating Company, Inc.             |  | New Jersey               
|Resorts Propco, Inc.                         |  | New Jersey
### §5131. Publication of list of recognized tribes

#### (a) Publication of list

The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register a list of all Indian tribes which the Secretary recognizes to be eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians.

#### (b) Frequency of publication

The list shall be published within 60 days of November 2, 1994, and annually on or before every January 30 thereafter.

(Pub. L. 103–454, title I, §104, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4792.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 479a–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7192

TED ANTHONY PREVATTE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HOWARD CROSS; P. L. CANNADY; JAMES B. FRENCH;

DANIEL L. STIENEKE; MACK JARVIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-98-428-5-H)

Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 19, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ted Anthony Prevatte, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ted A. Prevatte, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.

1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. Prevatte v. Cross, No. CA98-428-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **6104**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appell ee ,
v. EARL MCCRAE SCALES , Defendant

– Appell ant .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle D istrict of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. J ames A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. ( 1 : 04

- c r - 00 337

- JAB

- 1 )

Submitted : March 30 , 2010 Decided: April 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirme d by un published per curia m opinion
.
Earl McCra e Scales , Appellant Pro Se
. Angela Hewlett Miller , Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Earl McCrae Scales appe als the district court ’ s order denying his motion for sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United St ates v. Scales , No. 1:04

- cr 003 3 7

- JAB

- 1 . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
### §741. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1207, §1, 68 Stat. 1099, which set out the purpose of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal of Inconsistent Laws

Act Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1207, §20, 68 Stat. 1104, which provided for repeal of Acts or parts of Acts inconsistent with this subchapter, insofar as they affected the tribe or its members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### Separability

Act Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1207, §21, 68 Stat. 1104, which set forth separability provision, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §1397D. Qualified zone property defined

#### (a) General rule

For purposes of this part—

#### (1) In general

The term "qualified zone property" means any property to which section 168 applies (or would apply but for section 179) if—

(A) such property was acquired by the taxpayer by purchase (as defined in section 179(d)(2)) after the date on which the designation of the empowerment zone took effect,

(B) the original use of which in an empowerment zone commences with the taxpayer, and

(C) substantially all of the use of which is in an empowerment zone and is in the active conduct of a qualified business by the taxpayer in such zone.

#### (2) Special rule for substantial renovations

In the case of any property which is substantially renovated by the taxpayer, the requirements of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) shall be treated as satisfied. For purposes of the preceding sentence, property shall be treated as substantially renovated by the taxpayer if, during any 24-month period beginning after the date on which the designation of the empowerment zone took effect, additions to basis with respect to such property in the hands of the taxpayer exceed the greater of (i) an amount equal to the adjusted basis at the beginning of such 24-month period in the hands of the taxpayer, or (ii) $5,000.

#### (b) Special rules for sale-leasebacks

For purposes of subsection (a)(1)(B), if property is sold and leased back by the taxpayer within 3 months after the date such property was originally placed in service, such property shall be treated as originally placed in service not earlier than the date on which such property is used under the leaseback.

(Added Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, §13301(a), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 554, §1397C; renumbered §1397D, Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(7) [title I, §116(a)(2)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–602.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1397D was renumbered section 1397F of this title.

#### Amendments

2000—Pub. L. 106–554 renumbered section 1397C of this title as this section.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4791 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.4791

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
  To amend section 301 of title 44, United States Code, to establish a 
 term for the appointment of the Director of the Government Publishing 
                                 Office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TERM FOR APPOINTMENT OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNMENT 
PUBLISHING OFFICE.
    (a) In General.--Section 301 of title 44, United States Code, is 
amended--
        (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``The President''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) The Director shall be appointed for a term of 10 years.
    ``(c) An individual appointed to the position of Director, by and 
with the advice and consent of the Senate, may be reappointed to that 
position in accordance with subsections (a) and (b).''.
    (b) Application to Incumbent.--If there is an individual serving in 
the position of Director of the Government Publishing Office, by and 
with the advice and consent of the Senate, on the date of enactment of 
this Act--
        (1) the amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with 
    respect to the appointment of such individual; and
        (2) the term of the individual for purposes of subsection (b) 
    of section 301 of title 44, United States Code, as added by 
    subsection (a), shall be considered to have started on the date on 
    which the individual assumed the office of Director of the 
    Government Publishing Office.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### **Subchapter D—Court Review of Tax Court Decisions**

Sec.
7481.
Date when Tax Court decision becomes final.
7482.
Courts of review.
7483.
Notice of appeal.
7484.
Change of incumbent in office.
7485.
Bond to stay assessment and collection.
7486.
Refund, credit, or abatement of amounts disallowed.
7487.
Cross references.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1969**—Pub. L. 91–172, title IX, §§959(b), 960(i)(2), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 734, 735, substituted "Notice of appeal" for "Petition for review" in item 7483 and substituted "Cross references" for "Cross reference" in item 7487.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Russell Scheirman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2007 |  |  |  |                                              
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ W. Russell Scheirman                     
|                        |  |  |  | W. Russell Scheirman, Chief Financial Officer
### §37. Overpayments of tax

**For credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle for overpayments of tax, see section 6401.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 16, §38; renumbered §39, Pub. L. 87–834, §2(a), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 962; renumbered §40, Pub. L. 89–44, title VIII, §809(c), June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 167; renumbered §42, Pub. L. 92–178, title VI, §601(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 553; renumbered §43, Pub. L. 94–12, title II, §203(a), Mar. 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 29; renumbered §44, Pub. L. 94–12, title II, §204(a), Mar. 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 30; renumbered §45, Pub. L. 94–12, title II, §208(a), Mar. 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 32; renumbered §35, Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §471(c), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 826; renumbered §36, Pub. L. 107–210, div. A, title II, §201(a), Aug. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 954; renumbered §37, Pub. L. 110–289, div. C, title I, §3011(a), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2888.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 37 was renumbered section 22 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7192

TED ANTHONY PREVATTE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HOWARD CROSS; P. L. CANNADY; JAMES B. FRENCH; DANIEL L. STIENEKE; MACK JARVIS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-428-5-H) Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 19, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ted Anthony Prevatte, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ted A. Prevatte, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Prevatte v. Cross , No. CA98-428-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 4.1168 Amendments to pleadings. ( a ) An application for review may be amended once as a matter of right prior to the filing of an answer and thereafter by leave of the administrative law judge upon proper motion.
( b ) Upon receipt of an initial or amended application for review or subsequent to granting leave to amend, the administrative law judge shall issue an order setting a time for filing an amended answer if the judge determines that such an answer is appropriate.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended July 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Martin Thorp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Lapis
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





October 31, 2005                           /s/ Martin Thorp
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Martin Thorp
                                            Chief Financial Officer
### §4907. Federal agencies or instrumentalities

Any special tax imposed by this subtitle, except the tax imposed by section 4411, shall apply to any agency or instrumentality of the United States unless such agency or instrumentality is granted by statute a specific exemption from such tax.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 594.)
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D 19

- 1966

_____________________________
E.L.J., Father of A.J. and B.J., Each A Minor Child

,
Appellant,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES
,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. David Gooding , Judge

.
October 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

. See Santosky v. Kramer , 455 U.S. 745 , 769 (1982) (holding that the clear and convincing evidence standard may be used to terminate parental rights as the standard “adequately conveys to the factfinder the level of subjective certainty about [its] factual conclusions necessary to satisfy due proces s ” ).

B.L. T HOMAS
, B ILBREY , and M.K. T HOMAS
, JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, Orlando

, for Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville, Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Guardian ad Litem Program, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.
#### § 34.5 Assurances.

Every application for a certificate, permit, right-of-way, lease, public land order, or other Federal authorization to which this part applies, filed after the effective date of these regulations, and every contract covered hereunder to provide goods, services, or facilities in the amount of $10,000 or more to a recipient, contractor, or subcontractor to which this Part applies, must contain an assurance that the recipient, contractor, or subcontractor does not and will not maintain any segregated facilities, and that all requirements imposed by or pursuant to section 17, Condition 11 of the President's *Decision* and implementing rules, regulations, and orders shall be met, and that it will require a similar assurance in every subcontract of $10,000 or more.
### §5368. Gauging and marking

#### (a) Gauging and marking

All wine or wine spirits shall be locked, sealed, and gauged, and shall be marked, branded, labeled, or otherwise identified, in such manner as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe.

#### (b) Marking

Wines shall be removed in such containers (including vessels, vehicles, and pipelines) bearing such marks and labels evidencing compliance with this chapter, as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1381; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1905(a)(20), 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1820, 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5368, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 666, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 substituted "Gauging and marking" for "Gauging, marking, and stamping" in section catchline, substituted "Marking" for "Stamping" in heading for subsec. (b), and, in text of subsec. (b), substituted "marks and labels" for "marks, labels, and stamps" and struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by section 1905(a)(20) of Pub. L. 94–455 effective on first day of first month which begins more than 90 days after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1905(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 5005 of this title.
#### § 404.51 Are proposed projects under the Rural Water Supply Program reviewed by the Administration?

Yes. The Administration will review all projects proposed for funding under the Reclamation's Rural Water Supply Program. This includes review under Executive Order 12322 to determine whether the project is consistent with the policies and programs of the President. This review will occur before the feasibility report is finalized.