alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of In Vivo Medical Diagnostics, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended July 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, In
Vivo Medical Diagnostics, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to In Vivo Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Lapis
Technologies,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.

March 18, 2005                              /s/ Bernard Turner
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Bernard Turner
                                            Chief Financial Officer
#### § 3273.26 When may I assign or transfer my site license?

You may assign or transfer your site license in whole or in part. Send BLM your completed and signed transfer application and the filing fee for assignment or transfer of site license found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter. Your application must include a written statement that the transferee will comply with all license terms and conditions, and that the lessee accepts the transfer. The transferee must submit a bond meeting the requirements of § 3273.19. The transfer is not effective until we approve the bond and site license transfer.

[72 FR 24400, May 2, 2007, as amended at 72 FR 50887, Sept. 5, 2007]
Appeal Reinstated; Order filed October 4, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00475

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF L .E.B, A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 1

Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10FD0110



### ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 29, 2018. The trial court has signed an order in accordance with Texas Rule of Civil P rocedure 306a finding appellant first received actual notice of the final judgment on June 21, 2018. The notice of appeal was therefore due July 23, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant timely filed the notice of appeal on June 11, 2018

. The appeal is ordered reinstated. The reporter’s recor d is due on or before
November 5 , 2018.

PER CURIAM
T RIAL C OURT O FFICIAL ' S R EQUEST FOR E XTENSION OF T IME TO F ILE R ECORD F AX to: Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk, 12 th Court of Appeals, Tyler, at (903)593-2193 C ourt of Appeals No. (If known): 12 -15-00248-CR Tr ial Court Style: STATE OF TEXAS VS. WILLIAM TAYLOR Tr ial Court & County: 159 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF ANGELINA COUNTY, TX Tr ial Court No.: 2014-0145 D ate Trial Clerk's Record Originally Due: NOVEMBER 17, 2015 D ate Court Reporter's/Recorder's Record Originally Due: N/A A nticipated Number of Pages of Record: 170 I am responsible for preparing a record in this appeal but I am unable to file the record by the original due date for the following reason/s: (Check all that apply - attach additional pages if necessary.) X to the best of my knowledge, the Appellant has made no claim of indigence and has failed to either pay the required fee or to make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record. my duties listed below preclude working on this record Other. (Explain.): I anticipate this record will be completed and forwarded to the 12 th Court of Appeals by NOVEMBER 30, 2015 i n which to prepare it. T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3.

I n compliance with T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.5(e), I certify that a copy of this notice has been served on counsel f or all parties to the trial Court's judgment or order being appealed. I further certify by my signature below that the information contained in this notice is true and within my personal knowledge. November 17, 2015 / S/Robin J. Crain Date Signature 936-634-4312 Robin J. Crain Office Phone Number P rinted Name

r crain@angelinacounty.net Deputy District Clerk E-mail Address (if available) Official TitleTh e following parties have been served with a copy of this document:

(Information may be either printed or typed.) Lead Counsel for A PPELLANT ( S ) : Lead Counsel for A PPELLEE ( S ) :

Name: DANIEL LAZARINE Name: APRIL AYERS-PEREZ Address: 400 LOUISIANA ST., STE. 200 A ddress: P.O. BOX 908 HOUSTON, TX 77002 LUFKIN, TX 75915 Phone no.: 713-224-4000 P hone no.: 936-632-5090 Attorney for: WILLIAM TAYLOR Attorney for: THE STATE OF TEXAS
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Station Freedom electrical performance modelThe baseline Space Station Freedom electric power system (EPS) employs photovoltaic (PV) arrays and nickel hydrogen (NiH2) batteries to supply power to housekeeping and user electrical loads via a direct current (dc) distribution system. The EPS was originally designed for an operating life of 30 years through orbital replacement of components. As the design and development of the EPS continues, accurate EPS performance predictions are needed to assess design options, operating scenarios, and resource allocations. To meet these needs, NASA Lewis Research Center (LeRC) has, over a 10 year period, developed SPACE (Station Power Analysis for Capability Evaluation), a computer code designed to predict EPS performance. This paper describes SPACE, its functionality, and its capabilities.Document ID19940013010Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsHojnicki, Jeffrey S.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Green, Robert D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Kerslake, Thomas W.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Mckissock, David B.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Trudell, Jeffrey J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1993Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-106395E-8220NAS 1.15:106395Meeting InformationMeeting: Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering ConferenceLocation: Atlanta, GACountry: United StatesStart Date: August 8, 1993End Date: August 13, 1993Sponsors:American Chemical SocietyAccession Number94N17483Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 474-12-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19940013010.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jed Beck, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  October 29, 2010
/s/ Jed BeckJed BeckPresident, Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,302.89

 2,303.02

 2,303.18

 2,303.34

 2,303.48

 2,303.61

 2,304.13

 2,304.40

 2,304.61

 2,304.74

 2,304.84

 2,304.86

 2,304.94

 2,305.09

 2,305.25

 2,305.38

 2,305.38

 2,305.43

 2,305.50

 2,305.59

 2,305.66

 2,305.68

 2,305.75

 2,305.77

 2,305.82

 2,305.88

 2,305.98

 2,306.02

 2,306.05

 2,306.11

 1,496.6

 1,498.2

 1,500.1

 1,502.0

 1,503.7

 1,505.3

 1,511.6

 1,514.8

 1,517.4

 1,519.0

 1,520.2

 1,520.4

 1,521.4

 1,523.2

 1,525.1

 1,526.7

 1,526.7

 1,527.3

 1,528.2

 1,529.3

 1,530.1

 1,530.4

 1,531.2

 1,531.5

 1,532.1

 1,532.8

 1,534.0

 1,534.5

 1,534.9

 1,535.6

STORAGE

+2.0

+1.6

+1.9

+1.9

+1.7

+1.6

+6.3

+3.3

+2.5

+1.6

+1.2

+0.2

+1.0

+1.8

+1.9

+1.6

+0.0

+0.6

+0.9

+1.1

+0.9

+0.2

+0.9

+0.2

+0.6

+0.7

+1.2

+0.5

+0.4

+0.7

CHANGE

1,563

1,324

1,322

1,384

1,157

1,133

3,411

1,997

1,616

1,171

908

777

806

1,201

1,330

984

762

672

766

965

689

705

781

532

605

695

946

571

427

743

INFLOW

 536

 538

 350

 405

 300

 318

 249

 217

 281

 350

 293

 630

 318

 282

 319

 160

 751

 354

 304

 395

 259

 533

 344

 409

 298

 327

 300

 293

 242

 341

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 85

 0

 27

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 26

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 0

 0

 7

 7

 25

 0

 46

 53

 0

 4

 25

 0

 0

 29

 0

 11

 11

 32

 18

 0

 47

 7

 0

 0

 0

 32

 32

 0

 32

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .07

 .00

 .13

 .15

 .00

 .01

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .09

 .05

 .00

 .13

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .09

 .00

 .09

INCHES

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .95

 1.02

 .00

 .29

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .20

 .14

 .22

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .63

 .63

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2010 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +41.0 31,943 10,696 0 140 418 1.17 4.17

ACRE-FEET +41,000 63,359 21,216 0 278 829

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 21,216

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 278

 21,494

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.17

JULY 1, 2010 11.79

 1,494.6

(1) (1)
#### J. Wesley Childers et al., Appellants, *v.*New York Power and Light Corporation, Respondent.

Third Department,

May 4, 1949.

*134
      *William A. Glenn,*attorney *(William Evans*of counsel), for appellants.

*Albert J. Danaher,*attorney *(Julian B. Erway*and *Thomas E. Ryan*of counsel), for respondent.

Deyo, J.

The action is for treble damages for trespass, and the resulting destruction of a shade tree allegedly standing on plaintiffs’ property. The separate defense complained of is to the effect that the defendant caused the tree to be cut down because its rotted and diseased condition presented an imminent menace and danger to persons lawfully using defendant’s nearby right of way and to defendant’s wires and adjacent buildings to which such wires were attached.

It is an ancient principle of common law that an individual who suffers injury from a private nuisance may summarily abate the same without resort to legal proceedings, provided he can do so without causing a breach of the peace. As a general rule, the party asserting this right must first give notice of his intention to do so. However, if danger is imminent to health, life or property, and the necessity of prompt removal be urgent, previous notice may be excused. *(Harrower*v. *Ritson,*37 Barb. 301, 305; 39 Am. Jur., Nuisances, § 191 *et*seq.; 46 O. J., Nuisances, § 358 *et seq.;*Joyce on Nuisances, § 374 *et seq.;*Restatement, Torts, § 201 *et seq.)*

The sum and substance of the allegations complained of is that the tree constituted a private nuisance which was an imminent danger to the defendant and others. The defense was therefore properly interposed without an allegation of prior notice, and is sufficient in law.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs to the defendant-respondent.

Foster, P. J., Heeeernax', Saktry and Bergak, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs to defendant-respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0589

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. 

MIKEL STETSON LETHERMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until March 28, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

February 24 2022

02/24/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0589
Source Categories

Emissions 

(tons/yr) %

Cumulative 

%

Industrial Boilers 4.55E-01 2.15 2.15

Institutional/Commercial Heaters 5.37E-01 2.54 4.69

Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (MON) 2.11E-02 0.10 4.79

Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) 1.93E+01 91.32 96.11

Secondary Lead Smelting 6.82E-01 3.22 99.33

Tire Production 1.43E-01 0.67 100.00

Total Emissions 21.18 100.00

Acrolein
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, S. BradfordAntle, the Chief Executive Officer of SI International, Inc. (the “Company”),has executed this certification in connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/Afor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”). Theundersigned hereby certifies that:  

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 10, 2006  | /s/ S. BRADFORD ANTLE |                                  |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                          | Name:                 | S. Bradford Antle                     |
|                          | Title:                | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                               |                       |                                       |  |

 

----

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Thomas E.Dunn, the Chief Financial Officer of SI International, Inc. (the “Company”),has executed this certification in connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/Afor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”). Theundersigned hereby certifies that:  

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 10, 2006  | /s/ THOMAS E. DUNN |                                                                    |
|-------------------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Name:              | Thomas E. Dunn                                                          |
|                          | Title:             | Executive Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer |
|                               |                    |                                                                         |  |

 

----
### §759. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1207, §19, 68 Stat. 1104, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to issue rules and regulations necessary to effectuate the purposes of this subchapter and to provide for tribal referenda on matters pertaining to management or disposition of tribal assets, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §3012. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–601, §14, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3058.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 101–601, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3048, known as the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3001 of this title and Tables.
#### Daniel Norton, Respondent, v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Howard, J., not sitting.
#### Thomas Kane, Respondent, v. The Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, upon the ground that the verdict of the jury is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence upon the questions of defendant’s negligence and of plaintiff’s contributory negligence. All concurred.
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Renovo Holdings (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen W. Carnes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Stephen Carnes                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Stephen W. Carnes |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer and Principal |
|--------|---------------------------------------|

Financial Officer

 

|   | April 2, 2007 |
|--------|---------------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 131

 141

 144

 147

 139

 142

 154

 153

 140

 145

 150

 159

 161

 166

 167

 188

 190

 184

 192

 192

 196

 197

 198

 200

 198

 192

 196

 200

 214

 209

 201

 125

 130

 139

 137

 134

 133

 137

 132

 131

 134

 141

 144

 148

 153

 156

 163

 173

 175

 174

 174

 181

 183

 179

 187

 182

 174

 175

 180

 196

 190

 181

 128

 134

 142

 142

 137

 136

 144

 139

 135

 139

 145

 149

 155

 160

 163

 176

 181

 180

 183

 183

 187

 188

 187

 195

 190

 180

 182

 189

 202

 202

 189

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 12, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 4,140

 4,109

 4,084

 4,054

 4,018

 3,990

 3,981

 3,973

 3,958

 3,952

 3,955

 3,968

 3,989

 4,020

 4,058

 4,109

 4,164

 4,216

 4,269

 4,321

 4,376

 4,437

 4,501

 4,572

 4,637

 4,686

 4,738

 4,800

 4,876

 4,953

 5,014

 138

 137

 136

 135

 134

 133

 133

 132

 132

 132

 132

 132

 133

 134

 135

 137

 139

 141

 142

 144

 146

 148

 150

 152

 155

 156

 158

 160

 163

 165

 167

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 104

 109

 102

 96

 102

 104

 105

 117

 104

 110

 107

 115

 105

 102

 100

 95

 100

 103

 100

 106

 95

 99

 104

 97

 90

 102

 96

 93

 99

 108

 102

 91

 88

 88

 82

 78

 78

 81

 85

 84

 86

 87

 86

 86

 77

 79

 86

 81

 79

 78

 82

 82

 83

 83

 82

 83

 87

 80

 77

 74

 76

 78

 97

 92

 92

 89

 88

 90

 92

 95

 95

 96

 97

 96

 93

 89

 89

 90

 91

 90

 88

 91

 86

 87

 92

 88

 87

 94

 90

 89

 88

 96

 96

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0496 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MERLE RAYMOND BRANSTETTER,

Defendant and Appellant.

_______________________________________________________________ **ORDER**

_______________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including S eptember 12 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 26 2023

07/26/2023
Case Number: DA 22-0496
#### § 4.1604 Method of filing an appeal.

An appeal must be in writing, and must be submitted to: Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, U.S. Department of the Interior.

[45 FR 75213, Nov. 14, 1980. Redesignated at 52 FR 39525, Oct. 22, 1987 as amended at 67 FR 4368, Jan. 30, 2002; 88 FR 5796, Jan. 30, 2023]