alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 27.1 - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

FISCAL-YEAR-END                                    DEC-31-1999
PERIOD-END                                        JUNE-30-1999
CASH                                                  66401980
SECURITIES                                                   0
RECEIVABLES                                          569787259
ALLOWANCES                                            25316268
INVENTORY                                                    0
CURRENT-ASSETS                                       902045640
PP&E                                                2675534548
DEPRECEATION                                         351403649
TOTAL-ASSETS                                       15828165358
CURRENT-LIABILITIES                                  633220292
BONDS                                               1722944000
PREFERRED-MANDATORY                                          0
PREFERRED                                                    0
COMMON                                                33654578
OTHER-SE                                            9587890566
TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY                         15828165358
SALES                                                        0
TOTAL-REVENUES                                       994477932
CGS                                                          0
TOTAL-COSTS                                          601370756
OTHER-EXPENSES                                        13364113
LOSS-PROVISION                                               0
INTEREST-EXPENSE                                      78842277
INCOME-PRETAX                                        172798904
INCOME-TAX                                            82851582
INCOME-CONTINUING                                     93764449
DISCONTINUED                                                 0
EXTRAORDINARY                                                0
CHANGES                                                      0
NET-INCOME                                            93764449
EPS-BASIC                                                  .33
EPS-DILUTED                                                .32
§ 3210.14 May BLM readjust the terms and conditions in my lease? ( a ) ( 1 ) Except for rentals and royalties (readjustments of which are addressed in paragraph (b) of this section, BLM may readjust the terms and conditions of your lease 10 years after you begin production of geothermal resources from your lease, and at not less than 10-year intervals thereafter, under the procedures of paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section.
( 2 ) If another Federal agency manages the lands' surface, we will ask that agency to review the related terms and conditions and propose any readjustments. Once BLM and the surface managing agency reach agreement and the surface managing agency approves the proposed readjustment, we will follow the procedures in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section.
( b ) BLM may readjust your lease rentals and royalties at not less than 20-year intervals beginning 35 years after we determine that your lease is producing geothermal resources in commercial quantities. BLM will not increase your rentals or royalties by more than 50 percent over the rental or royalties you paid before the readjustment.
( c ) BLM will give you a written proposal to readjust the rentals, royalties, or other terms and conditions of your lease. You will have 30 days after you receive the proposal to file with BLM an objection in writing to the proposed new terms and conditions.
( d ) If you do not object in writing or relinquish your lease, you will conclusively be deemed to have agreed to the proposed new terms and conditions. BLM will issue a written decision setting the date that the new terms and conditions become effective as part of your lease. This decision will be in full force and effect under its own terms, and you are not authorized to appeal the BLM decision to the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
( e ) ( 1 ) If you file a timely objection in writing, BLM may issue a written decision making the readjusted terms and conditions effective no sooner than 90 days after we receive your objections, unless we reach an agreement with you as to the readjusted terms and conditions of your lease that makes them effective sooner.
( 2 ) If BLM does not reach an agreement with you by 60 days after we receive your objections, then either the lessee or BLM may terminate your lease, upon giving the other party 30 days' notice in writing. A termination under this paragraph does not affect your obligations that accrued under the lease when it was in effect, including those specified in § 3200.4.
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Madelin Otano Piloto, Plaintiff,

v.

Andrew Saul, Acting Commission of 

the Social Security Administration, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-21788-Civ-Scola

Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report And Recommendation

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. 

Torres, consistent with Administrative Order 2019-02 of this Court, for a ruling 

on all pre-trial, nondispositive matters and for a report and recommendation 

on any dispositive matters. (ECF No. 2.) On September 6, 2021, Judge Torres

issued a report, recommending that the Court deny the Plaintiff’s motion for 

summary judgment and grant the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 

(Report of Magistrate, ECF No. 27.) Neither party has filed an objection to the 

report, and the time to do so has passed.

The Court has considered Judge Torres’s report, the record, and the 

relevant legal authorities. The Court finds Judge Torres’s report and 

recommendation cogent and compelling. The Court affirms and adopts Judge 

Torres’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 27). Accordingly, the Court 

denies the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 21) and grants 

the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 24). The Court directs 

the Clerk to close this case. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

Done and ordered, at Miami, Florida, on September 16, 2021.

_______________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-21788-RNS Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2021 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4791 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4791

 To amend section 301 of title 44, United States Code, to establish a 
 term for the appointment of the Director of the Government Publishing 
                                Office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 6, 2022

    Mr. Blunt introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 301 of title 44, United States Code, to establish a 
 term for the appointment of the Director of the Government Publishing 
                                Office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERM FOR APPOINTMENT OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNMENT 
              PUBLISHING OFFICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 301 of title 44, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``The President''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) The Director shall be appointed for a term of 10 years.
    ``(c) An individual appointed to the position of Director, by and 
with the advice and consent of the Senate, may be reappointed to that 
position in accordance with subsections (a) and (b).''.
    (b) Application to Incumbent.--If there is an individual serving in 
the position of Director of the Government Publishing Office, by and 
with the advice and consent of the Senate, on the date of enactment of 
this Act--
            (1) the amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with 
        respect to the appointment of such individual; and
            (2) the term of the individual for purposes of subsection 
        (b) of section 301 of title 44, United States Code, as added by 
        subsection (a), shall be considered to have started on the date 
        on which the individual assumed the office of Director of the 
        Government Publishing Office.
                                 <all>
```
Earth Justice and US EPA

Meeting Attendees

May 15, 2012

A meeting was held today to discuss general issues covered in the National Emission Standards 

for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry, and Standards of 

Performance for Portland Cement Plants Reconsideration Proposal.

The following were in attendance:

Earth Justice: 

Jim Pew 

Earthjustice Clients

US EPA:

Peter Westlin

Sharon Nizich

Keith Barnett

Steffan Johnson

Peter Tsirigotis

Steven Silverman

Wendy Blake
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

March 25, 2002



Management Report on Internal Control over
Servicing of Securitized Credit Card Receivables

Management of JPMorgan Chase Bank is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables, which is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
proper servicing of securitized credit card receivables. The internal control
system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct
deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in any internal control, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.
Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to servicing of securitized credit card receivables.
Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control
may vary over time.

Management of JPMorgan Chase Bank assessed its internal control over servicing
of securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2001 in relation to
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
believes that, as of December 31, 2001, JPMorgan Chase Bank maintained effective
internal control over servicing of securitized credit card receivables.


/s/ Richard Srednicki
-----------------------
Richard Srednicki
Executive Vice President
JPMorgan Chase Bank


/s/ Daniel DeMeo
-------------------------
Daniel DeMeo
Senior Vice President
JPMorgan Chase Bank
1

6UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-21704-CV-GRAHAM/REID

TRAVIS SMITH,

Movant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

____________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge’s 

Report and Recommendation [D.E. 6] on Movant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion 

to vacate [D.E. 1].

THIS MATTER was assigned to the Honorable United States 

Magistrate Lisette M. Reid. On September 18, 2020, Magistrate Judge 

Reid issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Movant’s 

Motion be denied.[D.E. 6].

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Magistrate Rules of 

the Southern District of Florida, the Parties have 14 days after 

being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation to serve 

and file written objections, if any, with the District Court. 

On October 21, 2020, Movant filed objections to the Report [D.E. 

9], and on October 30, 2020, the Government responded [D.E. 10]. 

THE COURT’S RULING

After a careful review of the record, this Court affirms the Report 

and Recommendation over the Movant’s objections. The Report and 

Case 1:20-cv-21704-DLG Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/24/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Recommendation demonstrates an exhaustive review of the record and 

makes findings consistent with the law. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND AJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Lisette 

M. Reid’s Report and Recommendation [D.E. 6] is hereby RATIFIED,

AFFIRMED and APPROVED in its entirety. It is further 

ORDERED AND AJUDGED that Movant’s motion to vacate is hereby 

DISMISSED as time-barred and no certificate of appealability shall 

issue. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 24th day 

of November, 2020. 

s/ Donald L. Graham__________

DONALD L. GRAHAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: All counsel of record

Travis Smith 

01492-104

Jesup Federal Correctional Institution

Inmate Mail/Parcels

2680 301 South

Jesup, GA 31599

PRO SE

Noticing 2255 U.S. Attorney

Email: usafls-2255@usdoj.gov

Case 1:20-cv-21704-DLG Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/24/2020 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 628

 633

 691

 626

 388

 381

 366

 356

 348

 333

 318

 304

 324

 367

 419

 440

 435

 442

 444

 0

 0

 0

 504

 505

 480

 448

 493

 540

 559

 572

 632

 390

 376

 356

 356

 346

 331

 320

 301

 297

 302

 323

 375

 414

 413

 417

 322

 0

 0

 0

 479

 473

 445

 423

 428

 474

 588

 598

 665

 453

 380

 364

 359

 349

 336

 325

 307

 300

 310

 346

 400

 428

 425

 425

 426

 0

 0

 0

 488

 486

 462

 437

 448

 511

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 3714.1 Recording by mining claimant of request for copy of notice.

Section 5(d) of the Act provides as follows:

Any person claiming any right under or by virtue of any unpatented mining claim heretofore located and desiring to receive a copy of any notice to mining claimants which may be published as above provided in subsection (a) of this section 5, and which may affect lands embraced in such mining claim, may cause to be filed for record in the county office of record where the notice of certificate of location of such mining claim shall have been recorded, a duly acknowledged request for a copy of any such notice. Such request for copies shall set forth the name and address of the person requesting copies, and shall also set forth, as to each heretofore located unpatented mining claim under which such person asserts rights—

(1) The date of location;

(2) The book and page of the recordation of the notice or certificate of location; and

(3) The section or sections of the public land surveys which embrace such mining claim; or if such lands are unsurveyed, either the section or sections which would probably embrace such mining claim when the public land surveys are extended to such lands or a tie by courses and distances to an approved United States mineral monument. Other than in respect to the requirements of subsection (a) of this section 5 as to personal delivery or mailing of copies of notices and in respect to the provisions of subsection (e) of this section 5, no such request for copies of published notices and no statement or allegation in such request and no recordation thereof shall affect title to any mining claim or to any land or be deemed to constitute constructive notice to any person that the person requesting copies has, or claims, any right, title, or interest in or under any mining claim referred to in such request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 1, 2013

h0325 

# Order

April 1, 2013

144123 & (35)

JOHN TYRONE GREEN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 144123

COA: 302857

Macomb CC: 2010

- 004628

- FH

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2011

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for

contempt or entry of default judgment is DENIED.

V IVIANO

, J., did not participate because he pres ided over this case in the circuit

court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 20-21913-CV-UNGARO

JOSE PADILLA,

Plaintiff,

GULF COAST COLLECTION BUREAU, lN C.,

Defendant.

STANDING O RDER ON ZOO M AND O TH ER VIDEO-CONFERENCE HEARINGS

THIS CAUSE is before the Court sua sponte. The Court has considered the pertinent

portions of the record and is otherwise fully advised in the prem ises.

ln light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court m ay, from tim e to tim e, conduct hearings

via Zoom and other similar teclmologies. The Court hereby instructs the parties and their

counsel on its standing requirem ents for such hearings. lt is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

Before a Zoom hearing, al1 counsel must have taken steps to ensure competent

utilization of Zoom , including by com pleting the following Zoom tutorials:

a. Joining a m eeting: https://sunpoh.zoom .us/hc/en-us/alicles/zol36zlg3-

How-Do-l-loin-A-M eetingb. T e s t i n g c o m p u t e r o r d e v i c e a u d i o a n d v i d e o :

https'.//support.zoom .us/hc/en-us/aMicles/zol36zz83-H ow -D o-l-loin-orTest-M v-com puter-Audio- and https'.//support.zoom .us/hc/enus/adicles/zol36z3l3-How-Do-l-Test-M v-videoCase 1:20-cv-21913-UU Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 1 of 3
Sharing your screen in m eeting'. https://suppoM.zoom .us/hc/enus/adicles/zol36zls3-How-Do-l-share-M v-screend. Sharing m ultiple screens sim ultaneously:hups://suppod.zoom .usl c/enus/articles/l lsooo4z4z86-sharinc-M ultiple-screens-simultaneouslv

lf the Zoom hearing is an evidentiary hearing, counsel shall ensure that any

testifying parties and witnesses also watch the Zoom tutorials above.

ln a11 Zoom and similar video-conferenced hearings, a11 counsel, parties, and

witnesses m ust wear headsets with microphones to ensure the highest possible

sound quality.

4. The Court, and al1 witnesses being questioned about documents, must have access

to al1 documents that will be used at any hearing conduded with video-conference

technology. To this end, the parties shall:

a. Electronically file on the Court's docket, or conventionally file with the

Court a tlash drive containing, a1l relevant documents in advance of the

hearing; and

b. M eet-and-confer regarding a11 relevant docum ents in advance of the

hearing, and either'.

i. Ensure that each witness has copies of the relevant docum ents in

advance of the hearing, or

If a Zoom hearing, use the Zoom share function during the

hearing to share copies of the docum ents.

5. It is imperative that a11 Zoom and sim ilar hearings run as sm oothly as possible.

Failure to comply with this Order m ay result in the entry of sanctions, including

Case 1:20-cv-21913-UU Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 2 of 3
the exclusion of evidence in the event an exhibit is not readily available to a

testifying witness.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at M iam i, Florida, thi of June, 2020.

URSULA UNGARO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

copies provided'. counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-21913-UU Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2020 Page 3 of 3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arturo CARDENAS-RIOS, also known as Arturo C. Rios, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51150.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Arturo Cardenas-Rios raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mike Guidone and John Lettieri, Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### Subpart A—General Rules for Taxation of Estates and Trusts

Sec.
641.
Imposition of tax.
642.
Special rules for credits and deductions.
643.
Definitions applicable to subparts A, B, C, and D.
644.
Taxable year of trusts.
645.
Certain revocable trusts treated as part of estate.
646.
Tax treatment of electing Alaska Native Settlement Trusts.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–16, title VI, §671(c)(1), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 147, added item 646.

**1998**—Pub. L. 105–206, title VI, §6013(a)(2), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 819, renumbered item 646 as 645.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title V, §507(b)(3), title XIII, §1305(c), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 857, 1041, added items 644 and 646 and struck out former items 644 "Special rule for gain on property transferred to trust at less than fair market value" and 645 "Taxable year of trusts".

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XIV, §1403(b), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2713, added item 645.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title VII, §701(g)(2), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1580, added item 644.
### Subpart A—Minimum Funding Standards for Pension Plans

Sec.
430.
Minimum funding standards for single-employer defined benefit pension plans.
431.
Minimum funding standards for multiemployer plans. 1

432.
Additional funding rules for multiemployer plans in endangered status or critical status.
433.
Minimum funding standards for CSEC plans.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title IV, §401(a)(109)(B), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1189, added item 433.

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–280, title II, §212(d), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 917, added item 432.

1  Editorially supplied. Section 431 added by Pub. L. 109–280 without corresponding amendment of subpart analysis.