This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains regulatory documents having general

applicability and legal effect, most of which

are keyed to and codified in the Code of

Federal Regulations, which is published under

50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by

the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of

new books are listed in the first FEDERAL

REGISTER issue of each week.

Rules and Regulations Federal Register

62147 

Vol. 77, No. 198 

Friday, October 12, 2012 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 1 

[Docket No. FAA–2012–1043; Amdt. Nos. 1– 

1] 

Night Definition; Technical 

Amendment 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Technical amendment. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting the 

title of the publication ‘‘American Air 

Almanac’’ to its current title ‘‘Air 

Almanac’’. This document corrects this 

minor technical error in the codified 

regulations. 

DATES: Effective October 12, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

technical questions concerning this 

action, contact Ida M. Klepper, Airmen 

and Airspace Rules Division, Office of 

Rulemaking, ARM–100, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 800 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; telephone: 202– 

267–9677; email: Ida.Klepper@faa.gov. 

Background 

The former ‘‘American Air Almanac’’ 

was created to meet the general 

requirements for air navigation in the 

United Kingdom, the United States, and 

Canada. In 14 CFR 1.1 the definition of 

night refers to twilight times as 

published in the ‘‘American Air 

Almanac’’. The ‘‘American Air 

Almanac’’ publication ceased in 1953 

and is currently called the ‘‘Air 

Almanac’’. This technical amendment 

corrects the title of the publication. 

Technical Amendment 

This technical amendment makes one 

revision to the codified text § 1.1. The 

language in § 1.1incorrectly uses the 

title ‘‘American Air Almanac’’ when it 

should read ‘‘Air Almanac’’. 

Because the change in this technical 

amendment results in no substantive 

change, we find good cause exists under 

5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make the 

amendment effective in less than 30 

days. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 1 

Air transportation. 

The Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends chapter I of title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations as follows: 

PART 1—DEFINITIONS AND 

ABBREVIATIONS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 1 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

■ 2. In § 1.1, revise the definition of 

‘‘Night’’ to read as follows: 

§ 1.1 General definitions. 

* * * * * 

Night means the time between the end 

of evening civil twilight and the 

beginning of morning civil twilight, as 

published in the Air Almanac, 

converted to local time. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 

20, 2012. 

Lirio Liu, 

Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

[FR Doc. 2012–25032 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0370; FRL–9738–3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Pennsylvania; Pittsburgh-Beaver 

Valley Nonattainment Area 

Determinations of Attainment of the 

1997 Annual Fine Particulate Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is making two 

determinations regarding the PittsburghBeaver Valley fine particulate matter 

(PM2.5) nonattainment area (hereafter 

referred to as ‘‘the Pittsburgh Area’’ or 

‘‘the Area’’). First, EPA determines that 

the Area has attained the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS). This determination 

of attainment is based upon qualityassured, quality-controlled and certified 

ambient air monitoring data for the 

2008–2010 and 2009–2011 monitoring 

periods, showing that the Pittsburgh 

Area has monitored attainment of the 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. In 

accordance with the EPA’s applicable 

PM2.5 implementation rule, this 

determination of attainment suspends 

the requirements for the Area to submit 

an attainment demonstration and 

associated reasonably available control 

measures (RACM), a reasonable further 

progress (RFP) plan, contingency 

measures, and other planning State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions 

related to the attainment of the standard 

for so long as the Area continues to 

attain the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. 

EPA also determines, based on qualityassured, quality-controlled, and 

certified monitoring data for the 2007– 

2009 monitoring period, that the Area 

attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS 

by its applicable attainment date of 

April 5, 2010. These actions are being 

taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

October 12, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

Number EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0370. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the electronic docket, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for 

public inspection during normal 

business hours at the Air Protection 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emlyn Ve ́lez-Rosa, (215) 814–2038, or 

by email at velez-rosa.emlyn@epa.gov. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
62148 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

1The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s August 4, 

2011 annual ambient monitoring network plan was 

approved by EPA in a December 6, 2011 letter from 

Shawn M. Garvin, Regional Administrator of EPA 

Region III, to Michael L. Krancer, Secretary of the 

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental 

Protection. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. Background 

II. Summary of Actions 

III. Final Action 

IV. Effective Date 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

On July 16, 1997, EPA established an 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS at 15.0 

micrograms per cubic meter (mg/m3) 

(hereafter referred to as ‘‘the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS’’ or ‘‘the annual 

PM2.5 standard’’), based on a 3-year 

average of annual mean PM2.5

concentrations (62 FR 38652, July 18, 

1997). On January 5, 2005, EPA 

published its air quality designations 

and classifications for the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS based upon air quality 

monitoring data for calendar years 

2001–2003 (70 FR 944). These 

designations, effective on April 5, 2005, 

included the Pittsburgh Area as a 

nonattainment area for the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS. On March 29, 2007, EPA 

issued a detailed 1997 PM2.5

implementation rule, codified at 40 CFR 

part 51, subpart Z, in which EPA 

provided guidance for state and tribal 

plans to implement the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS (72 FR 20586, April 25, 

2007). 

On June 11, 2012 (77 FR 34297), EPA 

published a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPR) for the 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 

proposing two determinations of 

attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS for the Pittsburgh Area. First, 

EPA proposed to determine that the 

Pittsburgh Area has attained the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS, based upon 

quality-assured, quality-controlled, and 

certified ambient air monitoring data for 

the 2008–2010 period and preliminary 

data for 2009–2011. The 2011 data have 

now been quality-assured and certified, 

and show that the area continues to 

attain based on certified data for 2009– 

2011. See Table 1. In accordance with 

40 CFR 51.1004(c), EPA’s final 

determination of attainment suspends 

the requirements for the Pittsburgh Area 

to submit an attainment demonstration 

and RACM, a RFP plan, contingency 

measures, and other planning SIP 

revisions related to the attainment of the 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS for so long 

as the Area continues to attain the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS. In the NPR, EPA 

also proposed to determine that the 

Area attained the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS by its applicable attainment 

date of April 5, 2010, based on qualityassured, quality-controlled, and 

certified monitoring data for the 2007– 

2009 monitoring period. 

II. Summary of Actions 

EPA has previously determined that 

the PM2.5 monitoring network for the 

Pittsburgh Area is adequate.1 EPA found 

that the number of PM2.5 monitors in the 

Area meets the minimum regulatory 

requirements given in 40 CFR part 58, 

appendix D, and that monitoring is in 

accordance with Pennsylvania’s most 

recent annual monitoring network plan 

approved by EPA, as required by 40 CFR 

58.10. 

In this final rulemaking, EPA is 

determining that the Pittsburgh Area has 

attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, 

based on the most recent three years of 

quality-assured, quality-controlled, and 

certified data, and is also determining 

that the Area attained the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable 

attainment date of April 5, 2010. In 

accordance with the requirements of 40 

CFR part 50, EPA has reviewed the 

quality-assured, quality-controlled, 

certified PM2.5 data recorded in the 

EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS) 

database for the Pittsburgh Area during 

2007–2009, 2008–2010, and 2009–2011 

monitoring periods. 

Monitoring data for 2011, which was 

recently quality-assured, qualitycontrolled, and certified, show that the 

area continues to attain based on 

certified data for 2009–2011. Table 1 

below shows the PM2.5 annual design 

values for the Pittsburgh Area during 

the 2009–2011 period. The PM2.5 annual 

design value for the Pittsburgh Area 

during 2009–2011 is 14.7 mg/m3, based 

on the Orchard monitoring site, located 

in Allegheny County. The PM2.5

monitoring data for 2007–2009 and 

2008–2010 were set forth in EPA’s June 

11, 2012 NPR (77 FR 34297). 

TABLE 1—PITTSBURGH AREA 2009–2011 ANNUAL PM 2.5 DATA

[In μg/m3] 

County Site ID Site name 

Annual mean 2009–2011 

Design value 

Completeness 

status1

2009 2010 2011 

Allegheny .......... 42–003–0002 Orchard .................. ........................ 16.3 13.1 14.7 Incomplete 2

Allegheny .......... 42–003–0008 Lawrence ............... 11.6 12.2 11.1 11.6 Complete 

Allegheny .......... 42–003–0067 South Fayette ........ 10.8 11.7 10.6 11.0 Complete 

Allegheny .......... 42–003–0093 North Park ............. 9.6 10.5 9.0 9.7 Max. Quarter 

Allegheny .......... 42–003–0095 Moon ...................... 9.4 11.5 ........................ 10.5 Incomplete 2

Allegheny .......... 42–003–1008 Harrison ................. 12.7 13.0 11.6 12.4 Max. Quarter 

Allegheny .......... 42–003–1301 N. Braddock ........... 12.1 13.7 12.3 12.7 Collocated 

Armstrong ......... 42–005–0001 Kittaning ................. 11.0 13.2 12.1 12.1 Incomplete 2

Beaver .............. 42–007–0014 Beaver Falls ........... 13.0 12.5 11.7 12.4 Complete 

Washington ....... 42–125–0005 Charleroi ................ 12.6 13.2 12.0 12.6 Max. Quarter 

Washington ....... 42–125–0200 Washington ............ 11.1 12.1 10.8 11.3 Complete 

Washington ....... 42–125–5001 Florence ................. 12.2 8.9 5.9 9.0 Complete 

Westmoreland ... 42–129–0008 Greensburg ............ 13.5 14.0 13.7 13.7 Statistical 

1This column indicates if the design value for the monitor is: valid and complete (‘‘Complete’’) or incomplete (‘‘Incomplete’’). It also indicates 

which data substitution method, if any, was used to deem an incomplete design value valid and ‘‘Complete’’: ‘‘Max. Quarter’’ denotes the maximum quarter data substitution test; ‘‘Collocated’’ denotes the collocated data substitution test; ‘‘Statistical’’ denotes that EPA’s statistical procedure has been applied to address the missing data. Note that these techniques are discretionary. 2These monitors did not collect sufficient data during 2009–2011 due to shut-downs or startups. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 62149 

2The monitoring data for the 2008–2010 and 

2009–2011 monitoring periods that are relied on in 

this notice may be impacted by reductions 

associated with the Clean Air Interstate Rule 

(CAIR), which was remanded to EPA in 2008. North 

Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 896, as modified on 

reh’g, 550 F.3d 1176 (DC Cir. 2008). Nonetheless, 

because these determinations address only whether 

the monitoring data show attainment, at this time 

EPA need not address whether such attainment was 

due to the remanded CAIR. 

Several monitors did not meet the 

completeness requirement for one or 

more quarters during 2009–2011. EPA 

addressed the missing data of each of 

the monitors in order to determine if the 

monitors were attaining the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS, by applying one of these 

methods: Maximum quarter data 

substitution test, collocated data 

substitution test, and EPA’s statistical 

method. Additional information about 

the monitoring network and air quality 

data used in this determination can be 

found in the Technical Support 

Document for this final rulemaking 

notice (FRN) which is available online 

at www.regulations.gov, Docket number 

EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0370. 

The quality-assured, qualitycontrolled, certified data for 2008–2010 

and 2009–2011 show that the Pittsburgh 

Area has monitored attainment of the 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. 

Additionally, preliminary PM2.5 data 

available for 2012 is consistent with 

continued attainment of the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS in the Pittsburgh 

Area. EPA’s evaluation of the qualityassured, quality-controlled, certified 

monitoring data from 2007–2009 show 

that the Pittsburgh Area attained the 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its 

applicable attainment date. 

No public comments were submitted 

in response to the NPR. Additional 

information about the monitoring 

network and air quality data used in this 

determination is available in the 

Technical Support Documents for the 

NPR and the FRN. Relevant support 

documents for this action are available 

online at www.regulations.gov, Docket 

number EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0370. 

III. Final Action 

EPA is making two final 

determinations. First, EPA determines 

that the Area has attained the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS, based upon 

quality-assured and certified ambient air 

monitoring data for the 2008–2010 and 

2009–2011 periods. Pursuant to 40 CFR 

51.1004(c), this determination of 

attainment will suspend the 

requirements for the Area to submit an 

attainment demonstration and 

associated RACM, RFP plan, 

contingency measures, and other 

planning SIP revisions related to the 

attainment of the standard, for so long 

as the Area continues to attain the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Second, EPA 

determines that the Area attained the 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its 

applicable attainment date of April 5, 

2010, based on quality-assured, qualitycontrolled and certified monitoring data 

for the 2007–2009 monitoring period. 

This determination of attainment fulfills 

EPA’s obligation pursuant to section 

179(c)(1) of the CAA. 

Finalizing these determinations or 

either of them does not constitute a 

redesignation of the Pittsburgh Area to 

attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS under CAA section 107(d)(3). 

Neither determination of attainment 

involves approving a maintenance plan 

for the Pittsburgh Area, nor determines 

that the Area has met all the 

requirements for redesignation under 

the CAA, including that attainment be 

due to permanent and enforceable 

emission reductions.2 Therefore, the 

designation status of the Pittsburgh Area 

will remain nonattainment for the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS until such time as 

EPA takes final rulemaking action to 

determine that such portions meet the 

CAA requirements for redesignation to 

attainment. 

IV. Effective Date 

EPA finds that there is good cause for 

this approval to become effective on the 

date of publication because this action 

suspends the requirements for the 

Pittsburgh Area to submit an attainment 

demonstration and associated RACM, 

RFP plans, contingency measures and 

other SIPs related to attainment of the 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS required by 

CAA Section 172(c). See 40 CFR 

51.1004(c). The expedited effective date 

for this action is authorized under both 

5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which provides that 

rule actions may become effective less 

than 30 days after publication if the rule 

‘‘grants or recognizes an exemption or 

relieves a restriction’’ and section 5 

U.S.C. 553(d)(3), which allows an 

effective date less than 30 days after 

publication ‘‘as otherwise provided by 

the agency for good cause found and 

published with the rule.’’ The relief 

from these SIP planning obligations in 

CAA Section 172(c) is sufficient reason 

to allow an expedited effective date of 

this rule under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) and 

(3). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. General Requirements 

This action, which makes 

determinations of attainment based on 

air quality, will result in the suspension 

of certain Federal requirements and/or 

will not impose any additional 

requirements beyond those imposed by 

state law. For that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

B. Submission to Congress and the 

Comptroller General 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
62150 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by December 11, 2012. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action, in 

which EPA determines that the 

Pittsburgh Area has attained the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS and attained the 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by its 

attainment date, may not be challenged 

later in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Particulate matter, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Shawn M. Garvin, 

Regional Administrator, Region III. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart NN—Pennsylvania 

■ 2. Section 52.2056 is amended by 

adding paragraph (h) to read as follows: 

§ 52.2056 Determinations of Attainment. 

* * * * * 

(h) Based upon EPA’s review of the 

air quality data for the 3-year period 

2007 to 2009, EPA determined that the 

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley fine particle 

(PM2.5) nonattainment area attained the 

1997 annual PM2.5 National Ambient 

Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the 

applicable attainment date of April 5, 

2010. Therefore, EPA has met the 

requirement pursuant to CAA section 

179(c) to determine, based on the area’s 

air quality as of the attainment date, 

whether the area attained the standard. 

EPA also determined that the 

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5

nonattainment area is not subject to the 

consequences of failing to attain 

pursuant to section 179(d). 

■ 3. Section 52.2059 is amended by 

adding paragraph (g) to read as follows: 

§ 52.2059 Control strategy: Particulate 

matter. 

* * * * * 

(g) Determination of Attainment. EPA 

has determined, as of October 12, 2012, 

that based on 2008 to 2010 and 2009 to 

2011 ambient air quality data, the 

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley fine particle 

(PM2.5) nonattainment area has attained 

the 1997 annual PM2.5 national ambient 

air quality standards (NAAQS). This 

determination, in accordance with 40 

CFR 52.1004(c), suspends the 

requirements for the Pittsburgh-Beaver 

Valley PM2.5 nonattainment area to 

submit an attainment demonstration, 

associated reasonably available control 

measures, a reasonable further progress 

plan, contingency measures, and other 

planning SIPs related to attainment of 

the standard for as long as this area 

continues to meet the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS. 

[FR Doc. 2012–24782 Filed 10–11–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2011–0227; FRL–9734–7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Kentucky; 

Approval of Revisions to the Jefferson 

County Portion of the Kentucky SIP; 

New Source Review; Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to 

approve multiple changes to the 

Jefferson County portion of the 

Kentucky State Implementation Plan 

(SIP), submitted by the Commonwealth 

of Kentucky, through the Kentucky 

Division for Air Quality (KDAQ), to EPA 

in two submittals dated June 1, 2009, 

and February 8, 2011. These revisions 

were submitted by KDAQ on behalf of 

the Louisville Metro Air Pollution 

Control District (LMAPCD) (also 

referred to as Jefferson County) and 

modify the LMAPCD New Source 

Review (NSR) Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration (PSD) permitting 

regulations. EPA is approving Jefferson 

County’s June 1, 2009, and February 8, 

2011, SIP revisions because the Agency 

has determined that these SIP revisions 

are consistent with the Clean Air Act 

(CAA or Act) and EPA regulations 

regarding the PSD permitting program. 

DATES: This rule is effective November 

13, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2011–0227. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the www.regulations.gov 

Web site. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information regarding the Jefferson 

County portion of the Kentucky SIP, 

contact Ms. Twunjala Bradley, 

Regulatory Development Section, Air 

Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. 

Bradley’s telephone number is (404) 

562–9352; email address: 

bradley.twunjala@epa.gov. For 

information regarding the GHG 

Tailoring Rule, 2002 NSR Reform and 

NSR PM2.5 Rule, contact Yolanda 

Adams, Air Permits Section, at the same 

address above. Ms. Adams’ telephone 

number is (404) 562–9214; email 

address: adams.yolanda@epa.gov. For 

information regarding the Phase II Rule 

and ozone NAAQS, contact Jane Spann, 

Regulatory Development Section, at the 

same address above. Ms. Spann’s 

telephone number is (404) 562–9029; 

email address: spann.jane@epa.gov. For 

information regarding the PM2.5

NAAQS, contact Mr. Joel Huey, 

Regulatory Development Section, at the 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES