alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHow much redundancy: Some cost considerations, including examples for spacecraft systemsHow much redundancy should be built into a subsystem such as a space power subsystem. How does a reliability or design engineer choose between a power subsystem with 0.990 reliability and a more costly subsystem with 0.995 reliability. How does the engineer designing a power subsystem for a satellite decide between one power subsystem and a more reliable but heavier power subsystem. High reliability is not necessarily an end in itself. High reliability may be desirable in order to reduce the statistically expected loss due to a subsystem failure. However, this may not be the wisest use of funds since the expected loss due to subsystem failure is not the only cost involved. The subsystem itself may be very costly. The cost of the subsystem or the expected loss due to subsystem failure may not be considered separately. Therefore, the total of the two costs is minimized, i.e., the total of the cost of the subsystem plus the expected loss due to subsystem failure. A specific type of redundant system is considered, called a k-out-of-n: G subsystem. Such a subsystem has n modules, of which k are required to be good for the subsystem to be good. Five models are discussed which can be applied in the design of a power subsystem to select the unique redundancy method which will minimize the total of the cost of the power subsystem plus the expected loss due to the power subsystem failure. A BASIC computer program is available.Document ID19910008094Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsSuich, Ronald C.*(California State Univ. Fullerton., United States)*Patterson, Richard L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberE-5592NAS 1.15:103197NASA-TM-103197Meeting InformationMeeting: AIChE Summer National Meeting Session on Space Power Systems TechnologyLocation: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: August 19, 1990End Date: August 22, 1990Sponsors:American Inst. of Chemical EngineersAccession Number91N17407Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-1100PROJECT: RTOP 506-41-41Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910008094.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §4243. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for grants under this subchapter such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title VIII, §824, as added Pub. L. 106–568, title II, §203, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2895, and Pub. L. 106–569, title V, §513, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2989.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 106–568, §203, and Pub. L. 106–569, §513, enacted substantially identical sections 824 of Pub. L. 104–330. This section is based on the text of section 824 of Pub. L. 104–330, as added by Pub. L. 106–569, §513. Section 824 of Pub. L. 104–330, as added by Pub. L. 106–568, §203, authorized appropriations for fiscal years 2000 to 2004, instead of fiscal years 2001 to 2005.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Radiation Cancer Risk Projections for Exploration Missions: Uncertainty Reduction and MitigationIn this paper we discuss expected lifetime excess cancer risks for astronauts returning from exploration class missions. For the first time we make a quantitative assessment of uncertainties in cancer risk projections for space radiation exposures. Late effects from the high charge and energy (HZE) ions present in the galactic cosmic rays including cancer and the poorly understood risks to the central nervous system constitute the major risks. Methods used to project risk in low Earth orbit are seen as highly uncertain for projecting risks on exploration missions because of the limited radiobiology data available for estimating HZE ion risks. Cancer risk projections are described as a product of many biological and physical factors, each of which has a differential range of uncertainty due to lack of data and knowledge. Monte-Carlo sampling from subjective error distributions represents the lack of knowledge in each factor to quantify risk projection overall uncertainty. Cancer risk analysis is applied to several exploration mission scenarios. At solar minimum, the number of days in space where career risk of less than the limiting 3% excess cancer mortality can be assured at a 95% confidence level is found to be only of the order of 100 days.Document ID20020073167Acquisition SourceJohnson Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsCucinotta, Francis*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX United States)*Badhwar, Gautam*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX United States)*Saganti, Premkumar*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX United States)*Schimmerling, Walter*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Wilson, John*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Peterson, Leif*(Baylor Coll. of Medicine Houston, TX United States)*Dicello, John*(Johns Hopkins Univ. Baltimore, MD United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 2002Subject CategoryAerospace MedicineReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:210777S-887NASA/TP-2002-210777Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020073167.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### In the Matter of Lewis C. Burdick et al., Respondents, against Leon E. Dickinson, Appellant.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsQuadratic Optimization in the Problems of Active Control of SoundWe analyze the problem of suppressing the unwanted component of a time-harmonic acoustic field (noise) on a predetermined region of interest. The suppression is rendered by active means, i.e., by introducing the additional acoustic sources called controls that generate the appropriate anti-sound. Previously, we have obtained general solutions for active controls in both continuous and discrete formulations of the problem. We have also obtained optimal solutions that minimize the overall absolute acoustic source strength of active control sources. These optimal solutions happen to be particular layers of monopoles on the perimeter of the protected region. Mathematically, minimization of acoustic source strength is equivalent to minimization in the sense of L(sub 1). By contrast. in the current paper we formulate and study optimization problems that involve quadratic functions of merit. Specifically, we minimize the L(sub 2) norm of the control sources, and we consider both the unconstrained and constrained minimization. The unconstrained L(sub 2) minimization is certainly the easiest problem to address numerically. On the other hand, the constrained approach allows one to analyze sophisticated geometries. In a special case, we call compare our finite-difference optimal solutions to the continuous optimal solutions obtained previously using a semi-analytic technique. We also show that the optima obtained in the sense of L(sub 2) differ drastically from those obtained in the sense of L(sub 1).Document ID20020090714Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLoncaric, J.*(Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering Hampton, VA United States)*Tsynkov, S. V.*(North Carolina State Univ. Raleigh, NC United States)*Bushnell, Dennis M.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2002Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2002-211939ICASE-2002-35NAS 1.26:211939Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-90-52-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-97046Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020090714.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §164. Restoration to tribal ownership of unclaimed per capita and other individual payments of tribal trust funds; deposit in general fund of the Treasury

Unless otherwise specifically provided by law, the share of an individual member of an Indian tribe or group in a per capita or other distribution, individualization, segregation, or proration of Indian tribal or group funds held in trust by the United States, or in an annuity payment under a treaty, heretofore or hereafter authorized by law, and any interest earned on such share that is properly creditable to the individual shall be restored to tribal ownership if for any reason such share cannot be paid to the individual entitled thereto and remains unclaimed for a period of six years from the date of the administrative directive to make the payment, or one year from September 22, 1961, whichever occurs later: Provided, That if such individual is a member of an Indian tribe or group that has no governing body recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as authorized to act on behalf of the tribe or group, such unpaid share and interest shall be regarded as not capable of restoration to a tribal or group entity and shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury of the United States.

(Pub. L. 87–283, §1, Sept. 22, 1961, 75 Stat. 584.)
### §72. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–317, §2(1), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4419

Section, R.S. §2080, related to abrogation of treaties with Indian tribes having tribal organizations in actual hostility to the United States.
Order filed November 16 , 2017.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00789

- CR

____________ ALBERTO J CELARIE , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1503899



### ORDER
Appellant filed a notice of appeal on August 21, 2017 appealing trial court cause numbers 1503899 and 1504399. Appellant indicates trial court c ause number 1503899 involved a conviction for felon in possession of a firearm. A revi ew of the record before this court indicates that trial court cause number 1503899 involved a charge of possession of a controlled substance and was dismissed as appellant was convicted in trial court cause numbers 1503898 and 1504399. As the notice of
app eal references a conviction for felon in possession of a firearm, not dismissal ofa charge for possession of a controlled substance, the notice of appeal may contain

a defect. Appellant is requested to determine if the notice of appeal contains a defect. If the notice of appeal is defective, appellant is requested to file an amended notice of appeal with this court on or before December 15, 2017

. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1; Few v. State , 230 S.W.3d 184, 190 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). If appellant fails to file anything in response to this order on or before December 15, 2017 , we will proceed based on the record before this court related to trial court cause number 1503899.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby, and Donovan.
### §3404. Return and payment by governmental employer

If the employer is the United States, or a State, or political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing, the return of the amount deducted and withheld upon any wages may be made by any officer or employee of the United States, or of such State, or political subdivision, or of the District of Columbia, or of such agency or instrumentality, as the case may be, having control of the payment of such wages, or appropriately designated for that purpose.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 469; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1903(c), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1810.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "Territory" after "or a State" and "of such State".
Exhibit
31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I,
Kevin Lacey, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Issue Direct Corporation and



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



|Date:
    July 10, 2017 | By: | /s/
    Kevin P. Lacey            
|----------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------
|                        |     | Chief
    Financial Officer       
|                        |     | (Principal
    Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                   UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                               Date: May 18, 2005

                        Commission File Number: 001-32305

                                    CORPBANCA
                  ---------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                         Huerfanos 1072, Santiago Chile
                         ------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)





     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                      ---                      ---

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                           Yes                       No    X
                                ---                       ---

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-        .
                                                 --------
<PAGE>
     On May 18, 2005, Corpbanca announced unaudited consolidated financial
results for the first quarter of 2005. A copy of the announcement is attached
hereto as Exhibit 99.1.
<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


  Date:  May 19, 2005


                                     CORPBANCA


                                     By: /s/ Camilo Morales Riquelme
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name:  Camilo Morales Riquelme
                                         Title: Division Manager - Planning and
                                                Development Control
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit   Description

99.1      Corpbanca announcement, dated May 18, 2005, covering unaudited
          consolidated financial results for the first quarter of 2005.
#### § 3862.1 Lode claim patent applications: General.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology of the northern Santa Ana Mountains, California

#### Professional Paper 420-D

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                 
  (19028 pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                 
    (22593 pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                 
    (7749 pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                 
    (5864 pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                 
    (3065 pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp420D 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:37
National Wildlife Refuge

Note: Quantities shown below are acre-feet of water

 Source of Level 2 Sources of Incremental

Refuge Level 21 Water Supplies Incremental Level 42 Level 4 Water Supply Total Level 43

Water Supplies MOU Non-Project Water Supplies MOU Replacement Supplies

Sacramento Valley

Sacramento 46,400 46,400 0 3,600 3,60040 50,000

Delevan 20,950 20,950 0 9,050 9,05040 30,000

Colusa 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 25,000

Sutter 23,500 20,500 3,00056,500 6,50040 30,000

Total 115,850 112,850 3,000519,150 19,1504135,000

1

 Quantity as defined in Article 1(i) of this Contract

2

 Quantity as defined in Article 1(h) of this Contract 

3 Quantity as defined in Article 1(j) of this Contract

4

 To be acquired in accordance with Article 3(a) of this Contract

5 Provided as firm supply from Sutter Extension WD

DRAFT 11/15/00
### **CHAPTER 91—ORGANIZATION AND MEMBERSHIP OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE**

Sec.
8001.
Authorization.
8002.
Membership.
8003.
Election of chairman and vice chairman.
8004.
Appointment and compensation of staff.
8005.
Payment of expenses.
20-01092-shl Doc 11 Filed 04/28/21 Entered 04/28/21 17:34:24 Main Document

Pg 1 of 3

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2021 Page 1 of 3
20-01092-shl Doc 11 Filed 04/28/21 Entered 04/28/21 17:34:24 Main Document

Pg 2 of 3

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2021 Page 2 of 3
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to TRANSFER this case to the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Florida, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b), 28 U.S.C.

§ 1412, and Bankruptcy Rule 7087, with a recommendation that the District Court for

the Southern District of Florida REMAND the case to the Circuit Court of the 11th 

Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1452(b ); and 

3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction solely to interpret and enforce this Order.

Dated: April 12, 2021 

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 

Attorneys for Defendant Eisner Amper LLP 

By: �L� 

Linda T. Coberly 

354 W. Wacker Drive 

Chicago, IL 60601 

T: (312) 558-8768 

LCoberly@winston.com 

3 

SOLOMON & CRAMER LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

By:4-k

Andrew T. 

�

Solomon 

25 West 39th Street, 7th Floor 

New York, NY 10018 

T: (212) 884-9102 

asolomon@solomoncramer.com 

So Ordered this 28th day of April 2021 

United States Bankruptcy Judge 

/s/ Sean H. Lane

20-01092-shl Doc 11 Filed 04/28/21 Entered 04/28/21 17:34:24 Main Document

Pg 3 of 3

Case 1:20-cv-22009-MGC Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2021 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANTS

Colony RIH Holdings, Inc.



|                                             |  |                          
|-------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Subsidiary                                   |  | Jurisdiction of Formation
|Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc. |  | Delaware                 
|Resorts Real Estate Holdings, Inc.           |  | New Jersey               

Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc.



|                                  |  |                          
|--------------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Subsidiary                        |  | Jurisdiction of Formation
|Resorts International Hotel, Inc. |  | New Jersey               
|New Pier Operating Company, Inc.  |  | New Jersey