alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ABRAHAM MARMOL BERNABE, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-72156 

Agency No. A029-217-336 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Immigration Judge

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Abraham Marmol Bernabe, a native and citizen of El Salvador, 

petitions for review of an immigration judge’s order affirming an asylum officer’s 

negative credible fear determination issued in expedited removal proceedings. Our 

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-72156 

We generally lack jurisdiction to review expedited removal proceedings, 

including the determination that Marmol Bernabe did not establish a credible fear 

of persecution or torture. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A)(iii) (“[N]o court shall have 

jurisdiction to review” determinations made under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(B)); 

Guerrier v. Garland, 18 F.4th 304, 312-13 (9th Cir. 2021) (holding there is no 

“colorable constitutional claims” exception to the limits 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A) 

places on this court’s review of expedited removal proceedings).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
### year dv year dv

2004 17.30 Baseline 2004 17.19 2018 14.93 2018 14.73 2028 13.24 2028 12.97 2038 11.55 2038 11.22 2048 9.86 2048 9.46 2058 8.17 2058 7.70 2064 7.16 Natural Conditions 2064 6.65

Big Bend Slope -0.169 Guadalupe Mountains slope -0.176 Big Bend Guadalupe Mtns

17.30 14.93

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

2004 2014 2024HazeIndex(dv) 

# URP for Big Bend

17.19 14.73

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

2004 2014 2024HazeIndex(dv) 

# URP for Guadalupe Mountains13.24 11.55 9.86 8.17

7.16

2024 2034 2044 2054 2064



### Year 

# URP for Big Bend

12.97 11.22 9.46 7.70

6.65

2024 2034 2044 2054 2064



### Year 

# URP for Guadalupe Mountains
### §561. Definition of deduction for dividends paid

#### (a) General rule

The deduction for dividends paid shall be the sum of—

(1) the dividends paid during the taxable year,

(2) the consent dividends for the taxable year (determined under section 565), and

(3) in the case of a personal holding company, the dividend carryover described in section 564.

#### (b) Special rules applicable

In determining the deduction for dividends paid, the rules provided in section 562 (relating to rules applicable in determining dividends eligible for dividends paid deduction) and section 563 (relating to dividends paid after the close of the taxable year) shall be applicable.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 198; Pub. L. 87–403, §3(f), Feb. 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 8; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(b)(32)(H), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1800.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–455 redesignated existing provisions of par. (1) as subsec. (b) and struck out par. (2) relating to special adjustment on disposition of antitrust stock as a dividend.

1962—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 87–403 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–455 applicable with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1976, see section 1901(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1962 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 87–403 applicable only with respect to distributions made after Feb. 2, 1962, see section 3(g) of Pub. L. 87–403, set out as a note under section 312 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-60835-CIV-SINGHAL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ex rel. LAUREN LAU,

Plaintiff,

v.

FILED UNDER SEAL

ELLWOOD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC;

AMERICORE HEALTH, LLC; et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING NINTH APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO CONSIDER ELECTION TO INTERVENE AND EXTENDING SEAL

Upon consideration of the United States’ Unopposed Ex Parte Application, 

pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(3), for a 30-day extension of time, 

from April 12, 2024, to and including May 13, 2024, in which to determine whether or not 

to intervene in the above-captioned action and during which the complaint and other 

filings shall, absent Court order, remain under seal, and finding good cause therein, it is 

hereby

ORDERED that the United States’ Unopposed Ex Parte Ninth Application for an 

Extension of the Intervention Period and Seal is GRANTED. The United States has until 

May 13, 2024 to notify the Court of its decision regarding intervention in the qui tam action. 

This is the last extension (the ninth) the Court will grant absent exceptional 

circumstances.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint and other filings shall remain under 

seal until further order of this Court, unless the United States requests that the seal be 

Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2024 Page 1 of 2
lifted prior thereto.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 15th day of April

2024.

cc: Counsel of Record

AUSA Rosaline Chan

Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2024 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 27, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Biodiesel Accreditation Commission (“NBAC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is National Biodiesel Accreditation Commission, Jefferson City, MO. The nature and scope of the NBAC's standards development activities are the administration of a certification program for both the manufacturers and marketers of biodiesel, both neat and blended. Certification by the NBAC indicates the applicant possesses and implements a quality assurance/quality control program meeting the Commission's requirements.                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-22153  Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of EvergreenBancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: March 16, 2007
 /s/ Gerald O. HatlerGerald O. HatlerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
### §261. General rule for disallowance of deductions

In computing taxable income no deduction shall in any case be allowed in respect of the items specified in this part.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 76.)
### §3652. Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are as follows:

(1) to carry out the responsibility of the United States to Indian tribes and members of Indian tribes by ensuring access to quality technical and legal assistance.

(2) To strengthen and improve the capacity of tribal court systems that address civil and criminal causes of action under the jurisdiction of Indian tribes.

(3) To strengthen tribal governments and the economies of Indian tribes through the enhancement and, where appropriate, development of tribal court systems for the administration of justice in Indian country by providing technical and legal assistance services.

(4) To encourage collaborative efforts between national or regional membership organizations and associations whose membership consists of judicial system personnel within tribal justice systems; non-profit entities which provide legal assistance services for Indian tribes, members of Indian tribes, and/or tribal justice systems.

(5) To assist in the development of tribal judicial systems by supplementing prior congressional efforts such as the Indian Tribal Justice Act [25 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.] (Public Law 103–176).

(Pub. L. 106–559, §3, Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2779.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 106–559, Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2778, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3651 of this title and Tables.

The Indian Tribal Justice Act, referred to in par. (5), is Pub. L. 103–176, Dec. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 2004, which is classified generally to chapter 38 (§3601 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3601 of this title and Tables.
### **Subchapter H—Miscellaneous Plants and Warehouses**

Part
I.
Vinegar plants.
II.
Volatile fruit-flavor concentrate plants.
[III.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter H consisted of parts I to III, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

#### Amendments

**1979**—Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(b)(9), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 291, struck out item relating to Part III "Manufacturing bonded warehouses" in table of Parts comprising Subchapter H.
### §5311. Detention of containers

It shall be lawful for any internal revenue officer to detain any container, containing or supposed to contain, distilled spirits, wines, or beer, when he has reason to believe that the tax imposed by law on such distilled spirits, wines, or beer has not been paid or determined as required by law, or that such container is being removed in violation of law; and every such container may be held by him at a safe place until it shall be determined whether the property so detained is liable by law to be proceeded against for forfeiture; but such summary detention shall not continue in any case longer than 72 hours without process of law or intervention of the officer to whom such detention is to be reported.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1375.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5311, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 658, related to importation of alcohol for industrial purposes, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859. See section 5232 of this title.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior section 5211, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 638, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1959, see section 210(a)(1) of Pub. L. 85–859, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 02, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 02, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0132. DON ARIAIL et al. v. WINDERMERE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

18CV0555
EPA’s Integrated Planning Model (IPM) v.4.10 

Run Files 

TR Base Case

TR Base Case.car 

TR Base Case.dat 

TR Base Case.rpe 

TR Base Case.tac 

TR Base Case AEO Gas

TR Base Case AEO Gas.car 

TR Base Case AEO Gas.dat 

TR Base Case AEO Gas.rpe 

TR Base Case AEO Gas.tac 

TR SB Limited Trading

TR SB Limited Trading.car 

TR SB Limited Trading.dat 

TR SB Limited Trading.rpe 

TR SB Limited Trading.tac 

TR SB Limited Trading AEO Gas

TR SB Limited Trading AEO Gas.car 

TR SB Limited Trading AEO Gas.dat 

TR SB Limited Trading AEO Gas.rpe 

TR SB Limited Trading AEO Gas.tac 

Please contact the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view or receive a copy 

of these documents. Requests for copies may be made as follows: 

In person/writing: 

Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center 

1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334 

Washington, DC. 20004 

Telephone: 

202-566-1744 

Fax: 

202-566- 9744 

Email: 

docket-customerservice@epa.gov
1

Palma, Elizabeth

From: Palma, Elizabeth

Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 12:13 PM

To: Aaron Szabo (aaron_l_szabo@omb.eop.gov)

Cc: Melinda Beaver (Beaver.Melinda@epa.gov); Gabrilovich, Lev; Long, Pam; Wood, Anna; 

Lorang, Phil; Jones, Rhea; Smith, Kristi; Paula VanLare (VanLare.Paula@epa.gov)

Subject: Responses to interagency comments on the draft supplemental exceptional events 

implementation guidance for wildfire/ozone events 

Attachments: O3_Wildfire_Guidance_compare 10-28-15_to 10-13-15.docx; O3_Wildfire_Guidance_

10-28-15_OMBcommentsaddressed.docx; Summary of Interagency Comments Under 

EO12866_13563 EPA Supplemental EE_EPAresponse_final_20151028.docx

Aaron ‐ 

Attached please find a clean version of the draft supplemental exceptional events implementation guidance (i.e., the

wildfire/ozone guidance) that incorporates changes resulting from OMB/interagency review as well as a few other

clarifications. I have also attached a "compare" document, which compares today's 10/28/15 clean version of the

guidance to the version that was accepted by OMB on 10/15/15. Also attached is the comment response document that

responds to the OMB/interagency comments that we received on Monday 10/26/15.  

Please let me know whether you have any additional comments or questions.  

Regards,

Beth

Beth W. Palma

USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

109 TW Alexander Drive (C539‐04)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

palma.elizabeth@epa.gov  

919.541.5432
EXHIBIT 3(i).1
 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
INFOSAFE SYSTEMS, INC.




---



##### 



Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock, Class E-1 and Class E-2 Common Stock
 General
 Voting Rights
    Dividends and Distributions
  2




---



##### 



Common Stock Subject to Priorities of Preferred Stock
 Liquidation Rights
 No Conversion of Class A Common Stock
 Conversion of Class B Common Stock
 Optional Conversion
 Optional Conversion Procedures
   Automatic Conversion
 Issuance Costs
 Reservation of Shares
  3




---



##### 



Class E Common Stock
 In General
 Determination Date
 E-1 Escrow Conditions
       E-2 Escrow Conditions
    4




---



##### 



Definitions
     Conversion
    5




---



##### 



No Transfer
 Registration
 Preferred Stock
 Convertible Preferred Stock
 Designation of the 9% Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
 Number
 Redemption
  Liquidation Preference
   6




---



##### 



Voting Rights
 Conversion
 Right to Convert
 Optional
Conversion
  Mechanics of Conversion
  7




---



##### 



Adjustments to Conversion Price
 Adjustments for Dividends, Distributions or Subdivisions
 Adjustments for Combinations or Consolidations
 Adjustments for Issuances of Shares at Less than Conversion Price
 No impairment
 Reservation of Stock Issuable Upon Conversion
 Certificate as to Adjustments
 Notices of Record Date
    8




---



##### 



Equal Rights
 No Reissuance of Series A Preferred Stock
 Additional Series of Preferred Stock
 Designation of Additional Series of Preferred Stock
      9




---



##### 



NAME
    
    ADDRESSRay A. Barr
    
    10 Bank StreetWhite Plains, New York 10606
       10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



INFOSAFE SYSTEMS, INC.By:
    /s/ Arthur R. MediciArthur R. MediciPresident and Chief Executive Officer  12
§ 2920.8 Fees. ( a ) *Rental.* ( 1 ) Holders of a land use authorization shall pay annually or otherwise as determined by the authorized officer, in advance, a rental as determined by the authorized officer. The rental shall be based either upon the fair market value of the rights authorized in the land use authorization or as determined by competitive bidding. In no case shall the rental be less than fair market value.
( 2 ) Rental fees for leases and easements may be adjusted every 5 years or earlier, as determined by the authorized officer, to reflect current fair market value.
( 3 ) The rental fees required by this section are payable when due, and a late charge of 1 percent per month of the unpaid amount or $15 per month, whichever is greater, shall be assessed if subsequent billings are required. Failure to pay the rental fee in a timely manner is cause for termination of the land use authorization.
( b ) *Cost Recovery fees.* Each request for renewal, transfer, or assignment of a lease or easement must be accompanied by non-refundable cost recovery fees determined in accordance with the provisions of §§ 2804.14 and 2805.16 of this chapter.
[70 FR 21078, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 65075, Oct. 31, 2008; 89 FR 25977, Apr. 12, 2024]
### §458aaa–10. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458aaa–10 was editorially reclassified as section 5391 of this title.