alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Caroline Goepfert, Plaintiff, v. Charles Brank and Annie Brank, Defendants, Impleaded with John Wolberg, Respondent, and Sadie Brozgel, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
#### § 3583.4 Hardrock mineral leases.
|  |  |  | VANDERBILT MANSION |
|--|--|--|--------------------|
(No. 740

Claimant awarded $6,768.33.)

#### Orange Crush Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Franchise *tax*— when *refund may he awarded.*This case is similar to that of *Herenden Milling Go.*v. *State, supra,*and the decision there announced governs this case.

Moran, Paltzer & O’Donnell, for claimant.

Oscar E, Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Edward C. Fitch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for the refund of franchise taxes erroneously paid to the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois, by claimant, in the years 1.921 and 1922, amounting.in all to $6)768.33.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, is, as a matter of law, sustained.

On the grounds of equity and social justice, we award claimant, the sum of $6,768.33.
#### § 2623.1 Effective date of grant.

Grants to the States of school lands in place (the numbered sections), of the character and status subject thereto, as a rule, are effective and operate to vest title upon the date of the approval of the statute making the grant or the date of the admission of the State into the Union, as to lands then surveyed, and as to the lands thereafter surveyed upon the date of the acceptance of the survey thereof by the Director of the Bureau of Land Management. (United States v. Morrison, 240 U.S. 192, 60 L. ed. 599; United States v. Sweet, 245 U.S. 563, 62 L. ed. 473; Wyoming et al. v. United States, supra.) It is held, therefore, that the grant made by the first paragraph of section 1 of the Act of January 25, 1927, subject to the provision therein with respect to indemnity or lieu lands, to the provisions of subsections (b) and (c) of said section 1 and following the plain provisions of subsection (a) thereof is effective upon the date of the approval of the Act (January 25, 1927) as to lands then surveyed and the survey thereof accepted by the Director of the Bureau of Land Management and as to the unsurveyed school sections in the State of Florida granted to that State by the Act of September 22, 1922. The grant, as to other lands thereafter surveyed, subject to the same provisions is effective upon the acceptance of the survey thereof as above indicated.
EX-10.15





 Exhibit 10.15 

ADDENDUM TO ANNEX 2 

IOT HUB SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT 

This Addendum to Annex 2 IOT Hub Software License Agreement(“Addendum”) is made and entered into by and between MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION
(“Mitsubishi” and/or “Provider”) and OTONOMO TECHNOLOGIES LTD. (“Otonomo”). 
 Mitsubishi and Otonomo are
hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party”. 
 WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, on June 26, 2020, the Parties made and entered into a IOT Hub Software License Agreement (“IOT HUB
Agreement”) with the purpose of Mitsubishi’s use of Otonomo’s IOT HUB Software ; and 
 WHEREAS, the Parties
desire to amend the IOT HUB Agreement as set forth in this Addendum; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual
covenants set forth herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 
  

	1.	 The Parties agree to modify Section 3.5 of the IOT HUB Agreement, replacing the existing provision with the
following: 


 “3.5. After the Service Launch, the Parties will determine the technical methodology and process by
which Licensee may make Provider’s Data available for Personal Use Cases as well as Aggregated Use Cases to Licensor through the Marketplace. If the Parties may not agree on such technical methodology and process within four (4) months after
the Service Launch, which may be extended from time to time upon mutual consent in writing between the Parties, both the Marketplace Agreement and this Agreement will be automatically terminated. 

 

	2.	 This Addendum shall be an integral and substantial part of the IOT HUB Agreement. Except otherwise provided in
this Addendum, all terms and conditions of the IOT HUB Agreement shall remain in full force and effect between the Parties. It remains understood between the Parties that, in case of discrepancies between the provisions of the IOT HUB Agreement and
those of this Addendum, the provisions of this Addendum shall prevail. 


  

	3.	 This Addendum shall be effective starting from December 1, 2020. 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Addendum to Vehicle Data Marketplace Agreement signed by duly authorized representatives of the Parties. 

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] 













			
	Accepted by: Otonomo Technologies Ltd.	    	Accepted by: Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
		
	Authorized Signature:	    	Authorized Signature:
		
	 /s/ Ben Volkow
	    	 /s/ Shingaku Kochi

	Print Name: Ben Volkow	    	Print Name: SHINGAKU KOCHI
		
	Title: CEO	    	Title: GM, Connected Information Business
		
	Date: November 29, 2020	    	Date: November 30, 2020

 SIGNATURE PAGE TO THE ADDEDNUM TO IOT HUB SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE AMONG Mitsubishi Motors
Corporation and Otonomo Technologies Ltd.
### §5241. Authority to denature

Under such regulations as the Secretary shall prescribe, distilled spirits may be denatured on the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant qualified for the processing of distilled spirits. Distilled spirits to be denatured under this section shall be of such kind and such degree of proof as the Secretary shall by regulations prescribe. Distilled spirits denatured under this section may be used on the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant in the manufacture of any article.

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1369; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(a)(37), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 286.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5241, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 644, related to supervision of operations of internal revenue bonded warehouses, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859. See sections 5201(a), 5202 (a), (c), (d), and 7803 of this title and section 22 of former Title 5, Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior sections 5194(c), 5303, 5310(a), 5331(a)(1), act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 635, 655, 658, 661, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1979—Pub. L. 96–39 substituted "a distilled spirits plant qualified for the processing of distilled spirits" for "any distilled spirits plant operated by a proprietor who is authorized to produce distilled spirits at such plant or on other bonded premises", struck out provision that any other person operating bonded premises may, at the discretion of the Secretary and under such regulations as he may prescribe, be authorized to denature distilled spirits on such bonded premises, and inserted provision that distilled spirits denatured under this section may be used on the bonded premises of a distilled spirits plant in the manufacture of any article.

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 810 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1959, see section 210(a)(1) of Pub. L. 85–859, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 135

 135

 135

 137

 141

 142

 141

 143

 139

 144

 146

 139

 141

 139

 141

 137

 140

 138

 134

 138

 136

 133

 130

 129

 118

 125

 122

 120

 117

 117

 127

 126

 128

 131

 132

 133

 135

 131

 134

 131

 132

 133

 133

 132

 130

 130

 132

 130

 128

 127

 126

 123

 121

 114

 112

 110

 112

 109

 108

 101

 132

 131

 131

 133

 136

 137

 137

 136

 136

 136

 137

 136

 137

 137

 136

 133

 135

 134

 132

 132

 132

 129

 126

 119

 115

 115

 116

 114

 112

 111

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
EXTENSION AGREEMENT

      Agreement dated this 18th day of February, 1997 between Infosafe Systems,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and D. H. Blair Investment Banking
Corp. ("Blair").

      WHEREAS, the Company and Blair are parties to an agreement dated January
25, 1995 regarding mergers, acquisitions and similar transactions (the "M/A
Agreement"); and

      WHEREAS, on the date hereof, the Company has completed a closing of a
private placement (the "Offering") through Blair, as placement agent, pursuant
to a Confidential Term Sheet dated February 10, 1997 (the "Term Sheet"); and

      WHEREAS, in connection with, and as a condition to, the Offering, the
Company has agreed to extend the M/A Agreement.

      NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for good and valuable consideration,
hereby agree that the M/A Agreement shall expire on the fifth anniversary of the
Final Closing of the Offering, as defined in the Term Sheet, subject to the
provisions M/A Agreement. Except as set forth herein, the M/A Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
the day and year first above written.

INFOSAFE SYSTEMS, INC.                  D. H. BLAIR INVESTMENT
                                        BANKING CORP.



By: /s/ Arthur R. Medici                By: /s/ Martin A. Bell
    ---------------------------             ---------------------------------
    Authorized Officer                      Martin A. Bell, Vice Chairman and
                                            General Counsel
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

448 KA 14-02169
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANDRE NORWOOD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (DANIEL GROSS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Daniel J. Doyle, J.), entered October 29, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant to vacate a judgment of conviction.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h) seeking to vacate the judgment convicting him following a jury trial of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]), based upon the alleged denial of effective assistance of counsel. Specifically, defendant alleged that, when he discussed a plea offer of 15 years to life, defense counsel failed to advise him that the maximum sentence, if convicted after trial, was 25 years to life. Following a hearing, Supreme Court determined that defendant’s self-serving testimony to that effect was not credible and that he therefore failed to meet the requisite burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he was denied effective assistance of counsel ( see CPL 440.30 [6]). “The court’s credibility determination is entitled to great weight . . . , and we perceive no basis for reversal on the record before us” ( People v Smith , 16 AD3d 1081, 1082, lv denied 4 NY3d 891; see People v Campbell
, 106 AD3d 1507, 1508, lv denied 21 NY3d 1002).

Entered: April 28, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### §4163. Monitoring of compliance

#### (a) Enforceable agreements

Each recipient, through binding contractual agreements with owners and otherwise, shall ensure long-term compliance with the provisions of this chapter. Such measures shall provide for (1) enforcement of the provisions of this chapter by the grant beneficiary or by recipients and other intended beneficiaries, and (2) remedies for the breach of such provisions.

#### (b) Periodic monitoring

Not less frequently than annually, each recipient shall review the activities conducted and housing assisted under this chapter to assess compliance with the requirements of this chapter. Such review shall include an appropriate level of onsite inspection of housing to determine compliance with applicable requirements. The results of each review shall be included in the performance report of the recipient submitted to the Secretary under section 4164 of this title and made available to the public.

#### (c) Performance measures

The Secretary shall establish such performance measures as may be necessary to assess compliance with the requirements of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title IV, §403, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4039; Pub. L. 110–411, title IV, §402, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4330.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–330, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4016, known as the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4101 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–411 inserted "an appropriate level of" after "shall include".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1997, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 107 of Pub. L. 104–330, set out as a note under section 4101 of this title.
#####  

**Exhibit 31**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer				Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act				As Adopted Pursuant to				Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

			I, Atsushi Maki, certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Amanasu Environment Corporation;
-  					Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a					material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,					in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading					with respect to the period covered by this annual report;				 
-  					Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included					in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,					results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented					in this annual report;				 
-  					I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures					(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:				 
							designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material							information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,							is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the							period in which this annual report is being prepared;						
							evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and							procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this							annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and						
							presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness							of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of							the Evaluation Date;						

-  					I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors					and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the					equivalent function):				 
							all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls							which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,							summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's							auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and						
							any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees							who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and						

-  					I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant					changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect					internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including					any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.				 

 Dated: April 13, 2009
#### § 3833.10 Procedures for recording mining claims and sites.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09875**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09875\09875_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09875\09875_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09875\09875_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09875\09875_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09875\09875_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09875\09875_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09875\09875_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09875\09875_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09875\09875_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09875\09875_email.pdf Follow-up correspondence and material for the survey.

09875\09875_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 09875\Supporting Documentation\09875 Calc Sheet.doc EPA Technical Review Notes

09875\Supporting Documentation\09875_(A2-3) USACE EA Approval.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 09875\Supporting Documentation\09875_(A5-2) Cope Station Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09875\Supporting Documentation\09875_(A5-3) Cope WBD.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09875\Supporting Documentation\09875_(D3-1) Cope Pond Systems Diagrams.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09875\Supporting Documentation\09875_(F5-6) COPE'S LANDFILL AND NPDES WELL LOCATIONS.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 09875\Supporting Documentation\09875_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09875\09875_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09875\09875_ Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
§ 3809.21 When do I have to submit a notice? ( a ) You must submit a complete notice of your operations 15 calendar days before you commence exploration causing surface disturbance of 5 acres or less of public lands on which reclamation has not been completed. See § 3809.301 for information on what you must include in your notice.
( b ) You must not segment a project area by filing a series of notices for the purpose of avoiding filing a plan of operations. See §§ 3809.300 through 3809.336 for regulations applicable to notice-level operations.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4818 

To prohibit the use of Federal and local funds to impose or enforce a 

COVID–19 vaccine mandate in District of Columbia schools, and to 

repeal the Coronavirus Immunization of School Students and Early 

Childhood Workers Regulation Amendment Act of 2021 enacted by the 

District of Columbia Council. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. LANKFORD, 

Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal and local funds to impose 

or enforce a COVID–19 vaccine mandate in District 

of Columbia schools, and to repeal the Coronavirus Immunization of School Students and Early Childhood 

Workers Regulation Amendment Act of 2021 enacted 

by the District of Columbia Council. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4818 IS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL AND LOCAL 

2 FUNDS TO IMPOSE OR ENFORCE COVID–19 

3 VACCINE MANDATE IN DISTRICT OF COLUM4 BIA SCHOOLS. 

5 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

6 (1) COVERED SCHOOL.—The term ‘‘covered 

7 school’’ means an elementary school or a secondary 

8 school, as those terms are defined in section 8101 of 

9 the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

10 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801), in the District of Columbia. 

11 (2) COVID–19 VACCINE.—The term ‘‘COVID– 

12 19 vaccine’’ means any vaccine for the prevention of 

13 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19) caused by 

14 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 

15 (SARS–CoV–2) that is approved under section 351 

16 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262) or 

17 section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos18 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 355) or authorized for emer19 gency use under section 564 of the Federal Food, 

20 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb–3). 

21 (b) PROHIBITION.—No Federal or local funds may 

22 be used by the District of Columbia or a covered school 

23 to impose or enforce a COVID–19 vaccine requirement on 

24 a student in connection with enrollment by the student 

25 in a covered school, including any requirement that a stu26 dent receive a COVID–19 vaccine in order to be able to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4818 IS

1 attend in-person classroom instruction or participate in 

2 any school-related activity on or off campus, including an 

3 athletic or academic competition. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CORONAVIRUS IMMUNIZATION OF 

5 SCHOOL STUDENTS AND EARLY CHILDHOOD 

6 WORKERS REGULATION AMENDMENT ACT OF 

7 2021. 

8 The Coronavirus Immunization of School Students 

9 and Early Childhood Workers Regulation Amendment Act 

10 of 2021 (D.C. Law 24–85), enacted by the District of Co11 lumbia Council on January 12, 2022, and effective on 

12 March 2, 2022, shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS