alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 3584.2 Minerals to be leased.

Leasable and hardrock minerals are subject to lease under this subpart.
-  Cotton and Tobacco 
-  Dairy 
-  Livestock, Poultry, and Grain 
-  Specialty Crops 
-  Local & Regional Food Marketing 
-  Organic 
-  Retail 
-  Run a Custom Report 
-  Contacts 
-  Search Market News 

**Dashboards**
            - Livestock, Veal, and Lamb Estimated Grading Dashboard

**Report Overviews**
            - Comprehensive Boxed Beef Cutout Overview (pdf)
            - National Boxed Beef Weekly Item Summary Overview (pdf)  |  csv

**Weekly**
            - Boneless Cow Beef & Trimmings-Formulated Sales (Fri) (pdf)
            - Boneless Cow Beef & Trimmings-Negotiated Sales (Fri) (pdf)
            - Boxed Beef Cutout & Cuts-Negotiated Sales (Fri) (pdf)  |  csv
            - Boxed Beef Cuts-Branded Product-Negotiated Sales (Mon) (pdf)
            - Boxed Beef Cuts-Formulated Sales (Mon) (pdf)
            - Boxed Beef Cuts-Ungraded Product (Mon) (pdf) – Negotiated Sales  
            - Boxed Beef Cuts-Negotiated Sales w/ 22-90 day delivery period (pdf)  
            - Boxed Beef Cuts-USDA Prime Product – Negotiated Sales (Mon) (pdf)
            - By-Products Drop Value (Cow) (Fri) (pdf)  | ( old txt )
            - Comprehensive Boxed Beef Cutout (Mon) (pdf)  |  txt  |  csv
            - Cutter Cow Cutout & Boxed Cow Beef Cuts-Negotiated Sales (Fri) (pdf)
            - Weekly Imported Beef Trade Report (Fri) (pdf)  |  Old txt  |  Old CSV
            - National Boxed Beef Weekly Item Summary (Mon) (pdf)
            - National Steer & Heifer Estimated Grading Percent Report (Mon) (txt)  |  csv
            - Weekly Cattle and Beef Summary (Mon) (pdf)
            - Weekly Cow and Boneless Beef Summary (Fri) (pdf)
            - Weekly Pork and Beef Variety Meat Report (pdf)
            - Weekly Tallow, Protein, and Hide Report (pdf)
            - Weekly Major Packer Hide Report (pdf)
            - Weekly Retail Beef Feature Activity (pdf)  |  Old (pdf)

**Monthly**
            - National Grass Fed Beef Report (Monthly) (pdf)
            - Vermont Monthly Local Beef Report (pdf)
(No. 939

Claim denied.)

#### George W. Brown, Administrator of the Estate of Anna L. Brown, Deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 19, 1927.*

Non-liability of *state*— not *liable for negligence of officers of sub-division of the State.*The State is not liable for the negligence of officers of a sub-division of the State.

*Same*— when *court is without jurisdiction.*The court will not take jurisdiction and consider claims arising through the negligence of officers or other authorities of sub-divisions of the State.

Huber & Reidy, f or claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim brought to recover on account of an accident that resulted in the death of Anna L. Brown on the 7th day of November 1924. The injury was caused by the slipping of a Ford automobile, in which the deceased was riding, from a high road into a ravine at a point where the< road crossed a culvert. The injury was sustained on a road in the township of Buffalo Prairie in the county of Rock Island, State of Illinois, and that at the time of the accident and for several years prior thereto said road at the place of accident was maintained, controlled and operated by said township of Buffalo Prairie operated by said township through its elected and appointed officers according to a. stipulation between said parties herewith filed, and it was further stipulated that said road was not at the time of the accident maintained, controlled or operated by the State of Illinois nor any of its officers or agents excepting in so far as the township road officers are exercising a State function in the performance of their duties and that it was not a part of any of the State roads or Bond issue roads of the State.

There can be no contention as to any legal liability of the State. It does not appear that there is any authority for this court to consider this case as a matter of equity or good conscience and it is the opinion of this court that if the State of Illinois assumed every liability caused by a defective dirt road throughout the State that the obligation would be over*255whelming and would be an obligation far from that which the legislature had in mind when this court was created.

It is the opinion of the court that this comes within the rule announced many times, that this court would not take jurisdiction to consider the allowance of claims that might arise through the negligence of officers or other authorities in townships or other similar organizations of the State. Therefore this claim is disallowed.
§ 3207.5 What terms (time periods) apply to my lease? Your lease may include a number of different time periods. Not every time period applies to every lease. These periods include: ( a ) A primary term consisting of: ( 1 ) Ten years;
( 2 ) An initial extension of the primary term for up to 5 years;
( 3 ) An additional extension of the primary term for up to 5 years;
( b ) A drilling extension of 5 years under § 3207.14;
( c ) A production extension of up to 35 years; and
( d ) A renewal period of up to 55 years.
§ 4.1286 Motion for a hearing on an appeal involving issues of fact. ( a ) Any party may file a motion that the Board refer a case to an administrative law judge for a hearing. The motion must state: ( 1 ) What specific issues of material fact require a hearing;
( 2 ) What evidence concerning these issues must be presented by oral testimony, or be subject to cross-examination;
( 3 ) What witnesses need to be examined; and
( 4 ) What documentary evidence requires explanation, if any.
( b ) In response to a motion under paragraph (a) of this section or on its own initiative, the Board may order a hearing if there are: ( 1 ) Any issues of material fact which, if proved, would alter the disposition of the appeal; or
( 2 ) Significant factual or legal issues remaining to be decided and the record without a hearing would be insufficient for resolving them.
( c ) If the Board orders a hearing, it must: ( 1 ) Specify the issues of fact upon which the hearing is to be held; and
( 2 ) Request the administrative law judge to issue: ( i ) Proposed findings of fact on the issues presented at the hearing;
( ii ) A recommended decision that includes findings of fact and conclusions of law; or
( iii ) A decision that will be final for the Department unless a notice of appeal is filed in accordance with § 4.411.
( d ) If the Board orders a hearing, it may do one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Suspend the effectiveness of the decision under review pending a final Departmental decision on the appeal if it finds good cause to do so;
( 2 ) Authorize the administrative law judge to specify additional issues; or
( 3 ) Authorize the parties to agree to additional issues that are material, with the approval of the administrative law judge.
( e ) The hearing will be conducted under §§ 4.1100, 4.1102 through 4.1115, 4.1121 through 4.1127, and 4.1130 through 4.1141. Unless the Board orders otherwise, the administrative law judge may consider other relevant issues and evidence identified after referral of the case for a hearing.
[75 FR 64669, Oct. 20, 2010]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVerification and Validation of Neural Networks for Aerospace SystemsThe Dryden Flight Research Center V&V working group and NASA Ames Research Center Automated Software Engineering (ASE) group collaborated to prepare this report. The purpose is to describe V&V processes and methods for certification of neural networks for aerospace applications, particularly adaptive flight control systems like Intelligent Flight Control Systems (IFCS) that use neural networks. This report is divided into the following two sections: Overview of Adaptive Systems and V&V Processes/Methods.Document ID20020070826Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMackall, Dale*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Nelson, Stacy*(Nelson Consulting Co. Moffett Field, CA United States)*Schumann, Johann*(Research Inst. for Advanced Computer Science Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 2002Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2002-211409NAS 1.26:211409Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: 3006-NEL-001Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020070826.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 3420.1-6 Consultation with Federal surface management agencies.

Where a Federal surface management agency other than the Bureau of Land Management administers limited areas overlying Federal coal within the boundaries of a comprehensive land use plan or land use analysis being prepared by the Bureau of Land Management, or where the Bureau of Land Management manages lands on which coal development may impact land units of other Federal agencies, the Bureau of Land Management shall consult with the other agency to jointly determine the acceptability for further consideration for leasing of the potentially impacted lands the other agency administers or lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management that may impact lands of another agency.

[52 FR 46473, Dec. 8, 1987]
§ 3435.3-3 Agreement to terms. ( a ) If both parties wish to proceed with the exchange, the authorized officer and the lessee or preference right lease applicant shall negotiate an exchange consistent with § 3435.1 of this title. The authorized officer shall consult with the regional coal team prior to initiation of such negotiations and shall consult again prior to finalization of the negotiated exchange.
( b ) Land proposed for lease in exchange for, or for inclusion in, an existing lease or preference right lease application shall be subject to leasing under Group 3400 or 3500 of this title as appropriate, and any coal lands shall have been found to be acceptable for further consideration for leasing under § 3420.1 of this title.
[44 FR 42628, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33144, July 30, 1982; 48 FR 37656, Aug. 19, 1983]
### SUBCHAPTER II—CONTRACTS WITH STATES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subchapter, consisting of sections 5341 to 5347 of this title, was not enacted as part of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act which comprises this chapter.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21710]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging Centers (ICMICS).
    Date: November 4-5, 2004.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Kenneth L. Bielat, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 7147, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-7576, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9efcf7fbf2ffeaf5def3fff7f2b0f0f7f6b0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="37555e525b56435c775a565e5b19595e5f19505841">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: September 22, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-21710 Filed 9-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3


Report of Independent Accountants
---------------------------------


JPMorgan Chase Bank, Servicer
and
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., Transferor,
and
The Bank of New York, Trustee

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Servicing of Securitized Credit Card
Receivables, that JPMorgan Chase Bank (the "Bank") maintained effective internal
control over servicing of securitized credit card receivables as of December 31,
2002, based upon the criteria for effective internal control established in
"Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Bank's management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit
card receivables. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
servicing of the securitized credit card receivables, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that JPMorgan Chase Bank maintained
effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit card receivables
as of December 31, 2002, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based upon
the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.




March 25, 2003
#### § 3511.10 Do certain leases allow me to mine other commodities as well?

Yes. Sodium leases authorize you to mine potassium compounds as related products, and potassium leases authorize mining associated sodium compounds and related products. A phosphate lease allows you to use deposits of silica, limestone or other rock on the lease for use in the processing or refining of phosphate, phosphate rock, and associated minerals mined from the leased lands. You must pay royalty on these materials as specified in your lease.
EXHIBIT B

National Wildlife Refuge

Note: Quantities shown below are acre-feet of water

 Source of Level 2 Sources of Incremental

Refuge Level 21 Water Supplies Incremental Level 42 Level 4 Water Supply Total Level 43

Water Supplies MOU Non-Project Water Supplies MOU Replacement Supplies

Sacramento Valley

Sacramento 46,400 46,400 0 3,600 3,60040 50,000

Delevan 20,950 20,950 0 9,050 9,0504

0 30,000

Colusa 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 25,000

Sutter 23,500 20,500 3,0005

6,500 6,50040 30,000

Total 115,850 112,850 3,0005

19,150 19,1504135,000

1

 Quantity as defined in Article 1(i) of this Contract

2

 Quantity as defined in Article 1(h) of this Contract 

3 Quantity as defined in Article 1(j) of this Contract

4

 To be acquired in accordance with Article 3(a) of this Contract

5 Provided as firm supply from Sutter Extension WD

Final 01/18/01
Exhibit 10.6


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE WARRANT


 


This AMENDMENT NO. 1 
to the Warrant (as defined below) (the “Amendment”), dated as of May 25, 2021 (the “Effective Date”),
by and between GROM SOCIAL ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida corporation (the “Company”), and AUCTUS FUND, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (the “Investor”). Each of the Company and the Investor shall be referred to collectively
as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party.”


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS,
the Company issued a common stock purchase warrant to Investor on February 9, 2021, for the purchase of up to 6,250,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock (the “Warrant”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties desire to amend certain terms of the Warrant as set forth below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, each of the Parties agrees with the other as follows:


 


1.        
Section 2(b) of the Warrant shall be deleted in its entirety on the Effective Date, provided, however, that if the Company does
not consummate an Uplist Offering (as defined in this Amendment) by June 30, 2021, then Section 2(b) of the Warrant shall automatically
be reincorporated and added back into the Warrant. “Uplist Offering” shall mean the Company’s consummation of an offering
of the Company’s common stock (or units consisting of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase the Company’s
common stock) that will result in the immediate initial listing for trading of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE American,
the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global Market, the Nasdaq Global Select Market, the New York Stock Exchange, or any other national
securities exchange (or any successors to any of the foregoing).


 


2.        
This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


3.        
The substantive laws of the applicable state, as well as terms regarding forum and jurisdiction, as originally provided in the
Warrant, shall govern the construction of this Amendment and the rights and remedies of the parties hereto.


 


4.        
Except as specifically modified hereby, all of the provisions of the Warrant, which are not in conflict with the terms of this
Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.


 


 


 


[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT
BLANK INTENTIONALLY]


 


 


 






    	 	1	 



     

    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have caused this Amendment No. 1 to Warrant to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


 





	 	GROM SOCIAL ENTERPRISES, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Darren Marks                         
	 	Name: Darren Marks
	 	Title: Chairman & CEO
	 	 
	 	 
	 	AUCTUS FUND, LLC
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Lou Posner                           
	 	Name: Lou Posner
	 	Title: Managing Director
	 	 
	 	 



 


 


 


 


 


 






    	 	2
Exhibit 10.1


 


GUIDED
THERAPEUTICS, INC.


5835
Peachtree Corners East, Suite B


Norcross,
Georgia 30092


 


April
__, 2021


 


Purchasers
pursuant to Securities Purchase Agreement


Dated
December 23, 2020


 


Re:
       Creation of Series F-2 Convertible Preferred Stock


 


Dear
Purchaser:


 


As
previously disclosed in the public filings of Guided Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), the recent private placement
pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 23, 2020, was well received and oversubscribed. As such and in order to
create the necessary preferred shares of the Company to meet the increased demand, the Company has filed a Certificate of Designation
titled Series F-2 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series F-2”) which has the same rights and preferences as the
Series F Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series F”). The purpose of this letter is to notify you that you may receive
Series F-2 instead of Series F but, as stated above, the rights and preferences of each of the preferred stock is identical in every
respect.


 


Please
confirm your acceptance of the Series F-2 shares in lieu of the Series F shares.


 


Thank
you.


 


Sincerely,


 


Guided
Therapeutics, Inc.


 


By:
__________________


Name:


Title:


 


Accepted
and Confirmed:


 


Name
of Purchaser:


Signature
of Purchaser:


Name
of Signatory:


Title
of Signatory:
#### Dorothea R. Turpin, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. William A. Turpin Company and Others, Appellants.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., and Dowling, J., dissented.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Attachments for Dir. ID. 2010-NM-035-AD