alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1032. Exchange of stock for property

#### (a) Nonrecognition of gain or loss

No gain or loss shall be recognized to a corporation on the receipt of money or other property in exchange for stock (including treasury stock) of such corporation. No gain or loss shall be recognized by a corporation with respect to any lapse or acquisition of an option, or with respect to a securities futures contract (as defined in section 1234B), to buy or sell its stock (including treasury stock).

#### (b) Basis

**For basis of property acquired by a corporation in certain exchanges for its stock, see section 362.**

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 303; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §57(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 574; Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(7) [title IV, §401(c)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–649.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–554 inserted ", or with respect to a securities futures contract (as defined in section 1234B)," after "an option" in second sentence.

1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–369 inserted provision that no gain or loss shall be recognized by a corporation with respect to any lapse or acquisition of an option to buy or sell its stock (including treasury stock).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2000 Amendment

Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(7) [title IV, §401(j)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–651, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting section 1234B of this title and amending this section and sections 1091, 1092, 1223, 1233, 1234A, 1256 and 7701 of this title] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 21, 2000]."

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §57(b), July 18, 1984, 1984, 98 Stat. 574, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to options acquired or lapsed after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 18, 1984] in taxable years ending after such date."
### §119. Allotment of tribal funds to individual Indians

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, from time to time, to designate any individual Indian belonging to any tribe or tribes whom he may deem to be capable of managing his or her affairs, and he may cause to be apportioned and allotted to any such Indian his or her pro rata share of any tribal or trust funds on deposit in the Treasury of the United States to the credit of the tribe or tribes of which said Indian is a member, and the amount so apportioned and allotted shall be placed to the credit of such Indian upon the books of the Treasury, and the same shall thereupon be subject to the order of such Indian: Provided, That no apportionment or allotment shall be made to any Indian until such Indian has first made an application therefor: Provided further, That the Secretaries of the Interior and of the Treasury are directed to withhold from such apportionment and allotment a sufficient sum of the said Indian funds as may be necessary or required to pay any existing claims against said Indians that may be pending for settlement by judicial determination in the United States Court of Federal Claims or in the Executive Departments of the Government, at time of such apportionment and allotment.

(Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 2523, §1, 34 Stat. 1221; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §160(a)(7), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 48; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "United States Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
#### § 3834.20 Adjusting location and maintenance fees.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTurbulent Navier-Stokes Flow Analysis of an Advanced Semispan Diamond-Wing Model in Tunnel and Free Air at High-Lift ConditionsTurbulent Navier-Stokes computational results are presented for an advanced diamond wing semispan model at low-speed, high-lift conditions. The numerical results are obtained in support of a wind-tunnel test that was conducted in the National Transonic Facility at the NASA Langley Research Center. The model incorporated a generic fuselage and was mounted on the tunnel sidewall using a constant-width non-metric standoff. The computations were performed at to a nominal approach and landing flow conditions.The computed high-lift flow characteristics for the model in both the tunnel and in free-air environment are presented. The computed wing pressure distributions agreed well with the measured data and they both indicated a small effect due to the tunnel wall interference effects. However, the wall interference effects were found to be relatively more pronounced in the measured and the computed lift, drag and pitching moment. Although the magnitudes of the computed forces and moment were slightly off compared to the measured data, the increments due the wall interference effects were predicted reasonably well. The numerical results are also presented on the combined effects of the tunnel sidewall boundary layer and the standoff geometry on the fuselage forebody pressure distributions and the resulting impact on the configuration longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics.Document ID20020078006Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsGhaffari, Farhad*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Biedron, Robert T.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Luckring, James M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 2002Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2002-211779NAS 1.60:211779L-18111Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-31-31-06Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020078006.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §2207. Liability of recipient of property over which decedent had power of appointment

Unless the decedent directs otherwise in his will, if any part of the gross estate on which the tax has been paid consists of the value of property included in the gross estate under section 2041, the executor shall be entitled to recover from the person receiving such property by reason of the exercise, nonexercise, or release of a power of appointment such portion of the total tax paid as the value of such property bears to the taxable estate. If there is more than one such person, the executor shall be entitled to recover from such persons in the same ratio. In the case of such property received by the surviving spouse of the decedent for which a deduction is allowed under section 2056 (relating to marital deduction), this section shall not apply to such property except as to the value thereof reduced by an amount equal to the excess of the aggregate amount of the marital deductions allowed under section 2056 over the amount of proceeds of insurance upon the life of the decedent receivable by the surviving spouse for which proceeds a marital deduction is allowed under such section.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 402; Pub. L. 94–455, title XX, §2001(c)(1)(I), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1852.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 substituted "the taxable estate" for "the sum of the taxable estate and the amount of the exemption allowed in computing the taxable estate, determined under section 2052, or section 2106(a), as the case may be" after "property bears to".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–455 applicable to estates of decedents dying after Dec. 31, 1976, see section 2001(d)(1) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 2001 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Administrator, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the authority to execute functions pertaining to the Healthy Communities Access Program (HCAP) and “HCAP Demonstration Projects,” section 340, including 340(j) of Title III, Part D of the Public Health Service Act, as amended. This authority may be redelegated.

This delegation shall be exercised under the Department's existing delegation and policy on regulations.

I have ratified any actions taken by the HRSA Administrator or other HRSA officials that involve the exercise of this authority prior to the effective date of this delegation.

This delegation was effective on the date of signature.

Dated: September 29, 2004.

Tommy G. Thompson,

Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.

[FR Doc. 04-22453 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-M
(All Programs).

ASSIGNMENT LIMITED--SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS OBLIGATED

The provisions of this contract shall apply to and bind the successors and

assigns ofthe parties hereto, but no assignment or transfer of this contract or any right

or interest therein shall be valid until approved in writing by the Contracting Officer.

(All Programs)

Approved 2/22/71; Revised 11/84

M.2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on august 18, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the Portland Cement Association has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL. The nature and scope of Portland Cement Association's standards development activities are for the design and construction of assemblies using cement, cement-based products, and associated products.

Additional information concerning the Portland Cement Association may be obtained from Stephen Szoke, P.E., Director, Codes and Standards, Portland Cement Association, 5420 Old Orchard Road, Skokie, IL 60077.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-22162  Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Ruth L. Wittmer, Respondent, v. Paul J. Wittmer, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas W. Osgood, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Xenith Bankshares, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |  |  |                                                                                                    
|----------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 1, 2017 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas W. Osgood                                                                               
|            |  |  |  | Thomas W. Osgood Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



23
(No. 1186

Claimant awarded $2,466.19.)

#### The Liquid Carbonic Company, name changed to McIntosh Carbonic Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 12, 1927.*

Franchise *tax*— when *refund will*Be *made. Overpayment.*Where through an error in the computation of the tax claimant paid a larger tax than is legally due the State, it is entitled to a refund of the amount of the overpayment.

Gillespie & Gillespie, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; David J. Kadyk, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech delivered

the opinion of the court:

This is a claim to recover $2,466.19, being the sum paid the State of Illinois as franchise tax for the years 1923 and 1924, in excess of the sum due the State of Illinois for those years. The claimant, the Liquid Carbonic Company, in its declaration, states that it is an Illinois corporation, with its principal business office at 3100 South Kedzie avenue, in the city of Chicago, State of Illinois; that' in the year 1923 it had an authorized capital stock of $5,500,000.00 par value shares, and that the total value of all the property of the corporation, located everywhere, and the total business of the corporation, transacted everywhere, amounted to $13,514,284.00, and the total amount of its business transacted, in the State of Illinois amounted to $4,117,524.00; the proportion of its authorized capital, taxable in the State of Illinois, was therefore .30467, and the value of the authorized capital stock taxable in that year amounted to $1,675,685.00, and the tax due the State of Illinois on such portion of its authorized capital stock $837.84, but that through an error in computation, petitioner paid in the year 1923 a franchise tax of $2,009.26, which sum was $1,171.42 in excess of the amount lawfully due the State of Illinois as a franchise tax from petitioner; that in the year 1924 it had an authorized capital stock of $5,500,000.00 par value shares, and that the total value of all of the property of ' the corporation, located everywhere, and the total business of the corporation, transacted everywhere, amounted to $13,-537,289.00, and the total value of its property located in the State of Illinois, and the total amount of its business transacted in the State of Illinois amounted to $3,932,975.00; the *391proportion of its authorized capital taxable in the State of Illinois was, therefore, .29052, and the value of its authorized capital stock taxable in that year amounted to $1,597,860.00, and the tax due the State of Illinois on its authorized capital stock was $798.83; but that through an error in computation, petitioner paid in the year 1924 a franchise tax of $2,093.60, which sum was $1,294.77 in excess of the amount lawfully due the State of Illinois as a franchise tax from petitioner, and that there is due therefore to claimant the sum of $2,466.19.'

A written consent of the Attorney General of the State of Illinois to the allowance of claim of petitioner in the sum of $2,466.19 was filed, and we accordingly award claimant the sum of $2,466.19.
### Subpart C—Taxable Year for Which Deductions Taken

Sec.
461.
General rule for taxable year of deduction.
[462, 463.
Repealed.]
464.
Limitations on deductions for certain farming expenses.
465.
Deductions limited to amount at risk.
[466.
Repealed.]
467.
Certain payments for the use of property or services.
468.
Special rules for mining and solid waste reclamation and closing costs.
468A.
Special rules for nuclear decommissioning costs.
468B.
Special rules for designated settlement funds.
469.
Passive activity losses and credits limited.
470.
Limitation on deductions allocable to property used by governments or other tax-exempt entities.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §848(b), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1606, added item 470.

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10201(b)(7), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–387, struck out item 463 "Accrual of vacation pay".

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title IV, §404(b)(2), title V, §501(b), title VIII, §823(b)(2), title XVIII, §§1807(a)(7)(B), 1899A(71), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2224, 2241, 2374, 2815, 2963, substituted "for certain farming expenses" for "in case of farming syndicates" in item 464, struck out item 466 "Qualified discount coupons redeemed after close of taxable year", inserted "the" before "use" in item 467, and added items 468B and 469.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §§91(b)(2), (c)(2), 92(b), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 604, 606, 612, added items 467, 468, and 468A.

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–600, title II, §201(c)(2), title III, §373(b), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2816, 2865, struck out "in case of certain activities" after "amount at risk" in item 465 and added item 466.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title II, §§204(b), 207(a)(2), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1532, 1537, added items 464 and 465.

**1975**—Pub. L. 93–625, §4(b), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2111, added item 463.

**1955**—Act June 15, 1955, ch. 143, §2(3), 69 Stat. 135, struck out item 462 "Reserves for estimated expenses, etc."
### §63. Consolidation of agencies

The President may, in his discretion, consolidate two or more agencies into one, and where Indians are located on reservations created by Executive order he may, with the consent of the tribes to be affected thereby, expressed in the usual manner, consolidate one or more tribes, and abolish such agencies as are thereby rendered unnecessary.

(May 17, 1882, ch. 163, §6, 22 Stat. 88; July 4, 1884, ch. 180, §6, 23 Stat. 97.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation to Secretary of the Interior of authority vested in President by this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 10250, June 5, 1951, 16 F.R. 5385, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExperimental aerothermodynamic research of hypersonic aircraftWind tunnel tests were conducted to establish a benchmark experimental data base for a genetic hypersonic aircraft vehicle. Comprehensive measurements were made at Mach 7 to give flow visualization, surface pressure, surface convective heat transfer, and flow field Pitot pressure for a delta platform all-body vehicle. The tests were conducted in the NASA/Ames 3.5-Foot Hypersonic Wind Tunnel at Reynolds numbers sufficient to give turbulent flow. Comparisons are made of the experimental results with computational solutions of the flow by an upwind parabolized Navier-Stokes code developed at Ames. Good agreement of experiment with solutions by the code is demonstrated.Document ID19900016638Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCleary, Joseph W.*(Eloret Corp. Palo Alto, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 23, 1990Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186903NAS 1.26:186903Accession Number90N25954Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-416Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016638.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024