alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3232. Court jurisdiction

The several district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction to entertain an application by the Attorney General on behalf of the Secretary to compel an employee or other person residing within the jurisdiction of the court or an employer subject to service of process within its jurisdiction to comply with any obligations imposed on such employee, employer, or other person under the provisions of this chapter. The jurisdiction herein specifically conferred upon such Federal courts shall not be held exclusive of any jurisdiction otherwise possessed by such courts to entertain civil actions, whether legal or equitable in nature, in aid of the enforcement of rights or obligations arising under the provisions of this chapter.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 437; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ray J. Oleson, the Chief Executive Officer of SI International, Inc. (the "Company"), has executed this certification in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2003 (the "Report"). The undersigned
hereby certifies that:



|Date: March 10, 2004 |  | /s/ RAY J. OLESON                          
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|                     |  | Name: Ray J. Oleson                        
|                     |  | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Thomas E. Dunn, the Chief Financial Officer of SI International, Inc. (the "Company"), has executed this certification in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2003 (the "Report"). The undersigned
hereby certifies that:



|Date: March 10, 2004 |  | /s/ THOMAS E. DUNN                 
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                     |  | Name: Thomas E. Dunn               
|                     |  | Title: Executive Vice President,   
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer

---

QuickLinks
### Subpart B—Distributions by a Partnership

Sec.
731.
Extent of recognition of gain or loss on distribution.
732.
Basis of distributed property other than money.
733.
Basis of distributee partner's interest.
734.
Adjustment to basis of undistributed partnership property where section 754 election or substantial basis reduction.
735.
Character of gain or loss on disposition of distributed property.
736.
Payments to a retiring partner or a deceased partner's successor in interest.
737.
Recognition of precontribution gain in case of certain distributions to contributing partner.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §833(c)(5)(B), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1592, substituted "Adjustment to basis of undistributed partnership property where section 754 election or substantial basis reduction" for "Optional adjustment to basis of undistributed partnership property" in item 734.

**1992**—Pub. L. 102–486, title XIX, §1937(b)(3), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3033, added item 737.
#### Jessie S. Perkins, as Executrix of William A. Schenck, Deceased, Respondent, v. Joseph Meter, Jr., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 692.]
San Mateo, CA
                                                               January 15, 1999
                                                               $140,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of one hundred fourty thousand dollars  ($140,000),  with interest
from the date  hereof at a rate of ten  percent  (10%) per annum,  which  amount
shall be secured by all of the assets of Borrower.  Said principal  shall be due
and payable on demand by Lender, which demand may be made at any time, but in no
event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred eighty (180) days after
the date of this Note. This Note may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1. Subordination - Creditor  subordinates to Imperial Bank ("Bank") any
security  interest or lien that  Creditor  may have in any property of Borrower.
All Subordinated  Debt is subordinated in right of payment to all obligations of
Borrower to Bank now existing or hereafter arising.

         2.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         3. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         4.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 15 day of January, 1999.

                                          Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                          By: __________________

                                          Title: ________________
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLow-speed wind-tunnel investigation of the stability and control characteristics of a series of flying wings with sweep angles of 70 degA wind-tunnel investigation was conducted in the Langley 12-Foot Low-Speed Tunnel to study the low-speed stability and control characteristics of a series of four flying wings over an extended range of angle of attack (-8 deg to 48 deg). Because of the current emphasis on reducing the radar cross section (RCS) of new military aircraft, the planform of each wing was composed of lines swept at a relatively high angle of 70 deg, and all the trailing edges and control surface hinge lines were aligned with one of the two leading edges. Three arrow planforms with different aspect ratios and one diamond planform were tested. The models incorporated leading-edge flaps for improved longitudinal characteristics and lateral stability and had three sets of trailing-edge flaps that were deflected differentially for roll control, symmetrically for pitch control, and in a split fashion for yaw control. Three top body widths and two sizes of twin vertical tails were also tested on each model. A large aerodynamic database was compiled that could be used to evaluate some of the trade-offs involved in the design of a configuration with a reduced RCS and good flight dynamic characteristics.Document ID19960003028Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRoss, Holly M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Fears, Scott P.*(Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co. Hampton, VA., United States)*Moul, Thomas M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1995Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-4671NAS 1.15:4671L-17460Accession Number96N13037Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-68-30-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960003028.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
INTERNET COMMERCE CORPORATION


                                                                   Exhibit 31.1



I, G. Michael Cassidy, certify that :


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Internet Commerce
   Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our report about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
   committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
   equivalent functions):

   a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      control over financial report which are reasonably likely to adversely
      affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and

   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date March 16, 2004



By:  /s/ G. Michael Cassidy
     ----------------------
     G. Michael Cassidy
     Chief Executive Officer
### §§91, 92. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 91, R.S. §2083, related to purchase of goods pursuant to any Indian treaty.

Section 92, R.S. §2084, related to purchase of goods by Office of Indian Affairs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Executive Documents**

#### Procurement Functions

Effective Jan. 1, 1947, Procurement Division of Department of the Treasury changed to Bureau of Federal Supply by regulation issued by Secretary of the Treasury under authority of section 301 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. Functions of Bureau of Federal Supply transferred to Administrator of General Services by section 102 of act June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, 63 Stat. 380, which was repealed and reenacted as section 303(a) of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §§1, 6(b), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062, 1304. Section 303(a) of Title 40 was amended generally by Pub. L. 109–313, §2(a)(1), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1734, and, as so amended, no longer relates to the Bureau of Federal Supply. See Historical and Revision Notes and 2006 Amendment note under section 303 of Title 40.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Function of determination of policies and methods of procurement, warehousing, and distribution of property, facilities, structures, improvements, machinery, equipment, stores, and supplies exercised by any agency transferred to a Procurement Division in Department of the Treasury by Ex. Ord. No. 6166, June 10, 1933, set out as a note under section 901 of Title 5.
EX-10.4





 Exhibit 10.4 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 

XOMETRY, INC. 

2016 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

A.    XOMETRY, INC., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware (the “Company”) established the Company’s 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); 

B.     The Plan currently provides for an aggregate of 1,953,236 shares of Common Stock to be reserved for issuance
under the Plan; and 
 C.    The Company now wishes to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of Common
Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan to an aggregate of 2,147,233 shares. 
 Effective immediately, Section 3(a)(i) of the Plan
is amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 1.    Effective immediately, Section 3(a)(i) of the Plan is
amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 “Subject to Section 9(a) relating to Capitalization
Adjustments, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Stock Awards from and after the Effective Date will not exceed 2,147,233 shares (the
“Share Reserve”), which number includes the sum of (x) 1,363,826 shares available for issuance under the Prior Plan as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern time on the Effective Date plus (y) such
number of shares, up to a maximum of 271,100 shares of Common Stock, subject to outstanding stock awards granted under the Prior Plan as of 12:01 a.m. Eastern time on the Effective Date that (1) expire or terminate for any reason prior to
exercise or settlement or without all shares covered by such award having been issued; (2) are forfeited, cancelled or otherwise returned to the Company because of the failure to meet a contingency or condition required to vest such shares; or
(3) are reacquired, repurchased or withheld (or not issued) to satisfy a tax withholding obligation in connection with an award or to satisfy the purchase price or exercise price of a stock award (such shares, the “Returning
Shares”), as and to the extent such Returning Shares become available from time to time.” 
 2.    In
all other respects the Plan will remain the same. 
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 












 I hereby certify that the foregoing amendment to the Plan was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Company as of June 27, 2017. 
  

	
	 /s/ Laurence Zuriff

	Laurence Zuriff
	Chief Financial Officer


 * * * * 

I hereby certify that the foregoing amendment to the Plan was duly approved by the Stockholders of the Company as of June 30, 2017. 

 

	
	 /s/ Laurence Zuriff

	Laurence Zuriff
	Chief Financial Officer


 [SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDMENT
NO. 2 TO 2016 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN]
#### § 3181.2 Designation of unit area; depth of test well.

An application for designation of an area as logically subject to development under a unit agreement and for determination of the depth of a test well may be filed by a proponent of such an agreement at the proper BLM office. Such application shall be accompanied by a map or diagram on a scale of not less than 2 inches to 1 mile, outlining the area sought to be designated under this section. The Federal, State, Indian and privately owned land should be indicated by distinctive symbols or colors. Federal and Indian oil and gas leases and lease applications should be identified by lease serial numbers. Geologic information, including the results of any geophysical surveys, and any other available information showing that unitization is necessary and advisable in the public interest should be furnished. All information submitted under this section is subject to part 2 of this title, which sets forth the rules of the Department of the Interior relating to public availability of information contained in Departmental records, as provided under this part at § 3100.4 of this chapter. These data will be considered by the authorized officer and the applicant will be informed of the decision reached. The designation of an area, pursuant to an application filed under this section, shall not create an exclusive right to submit an agreement for such area, nor preclude the inclusion of such area or any party thereof in another unit area.

[48 FR 26766, June 10, 1983. Redesignated at 48 FR 36587, Aug. 12, 1983, and amended at 63 FR 52953, Oct. 1, 1998]
§ 3871.2 Statement of claim. ( a ) The adverse claim must fully set forth the nature and extent of the interference or conflict; whether the adverse party claims as a purchaser for valuable consideration or as a locator. If the former, a certified copy of the original location, the original conveyance, a duly certified copy thereof, or an abstract of title from the office of the proper recorder should be furnished, or if the transaction was a merely verbal one he will narrate the circumstances attending the purchase, the date thereof, and the amount paid, which facts should be supported by the statement of one or more witnesses, if any were present at the time, and if he claims as a locator he must file a duly certified copy of the location from the office of the proper recorder.
( b ) In order that the “boundaries” and “extent” of the claim may be shown, it will be incumbent upon the adverse claimant to file a plat showing his entire claim, its relative situation or position with the one against which he claims, and the extent of the conflict: *Provided, however,* That if the application for patent describes the claim by legal subdivisions, the adverse claimant, if also claiming by legal subdivisions, may describe his adverse claim in the same manner without further survey or plat. If the claim is not described by legal subdivisions it will generally be more satisfactory if the plat thereof is made from an actual survey by a mineral surveyor and its correctness officially certified thereon by him.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:20-CV-21887-DPG

COMMODITIES FUTURES TRADING

COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

DANIEL FINGERHUT, 

DIGITAL PLATINUM, INC., DIGITAL 

PLATINUM, LTD., HUF MEDIYA 

(A/K/A HOOF MEDIA), TAL

VALARIOLA, and ITAY BARAK

Defendants,

AICEL CARBONERO, 

Relief Defendant. 

____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER’S FOURTH INTERIM APPLICATION FOR AN 

ORDER APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF FEES AND 

EXPENSES OF RECEIVER AND HER PROFESSIONALS

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Receiver’s Fourth Interim Application for 

an Order Approving and Authorizing Payment of Fees and Expenses of Receiver and Her

Professionals (the “Application”) [ECF No. ____]. The Court, having reviewed the Application, 

noting that the fees and costs requested therein are reasonable, necessary and commensurate with 

the skills and experience required for the activities performed and described therein, and that no 

objection to the Application has been filed, and otherwise being fully advised in the matter, finds 

good cause to approve the Application and grant the relief requested therein.

Accordingly, it is -

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Application is APPROVED.

Case 1:20-cv-21887-DPG Document 275-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/07/2021 Page 1 of 2
2. The total amount of fees and costs that the Receiver1 and her Lead Counsel, 

Damian & Valori LLP, incurred regarding work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties 

during the Application Period in the amount of $92,629.07 is hereby APPROVED.

3. The Receiver is AUTHORIZED to pay the Receiver and her Lead Counsel, 

Damian & Valori LLP, the amount of $92,629.07 (which total includes $79,508.00 in fees 

and 13,121.07 in costs) work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties.

4. The total amount of fees and costs that the Forensic Accountants, Kapila 

Mukamal, LLP, incurred regarding work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties during 

the Application Period in the amount of $5,718.26 is hereby APPROVED. 

5. The Receiver is AUTHORIZED to pay to her Forensic Accountants, 

Kapila Mukamal, LLP, the amount of $5,718.26 (which total includes $5,684.00 in fees 

and $34.26 in costs) for work performed fulfilling the Receiver’s duties.

6. The Court reserves final approval of all fees approved herein until such time 

as the Receiver is discharged of her duties in this matter and/or final disbursement of funds 

held by the Estate. 

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on this ____ day of 

___________, 2021.

_______________________________________

HONORABLE DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Copies to: All Counsel of Record

1 Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same ascribed meaning as in the Application. 

Case 1:20-cv-21887-DPG Document 275-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/07/2021 Page 2 of 2