alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §688. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 85–794, §2, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 958, which provided that moneys paid under former sections 687 to 689 of this title would not be subject to liens or claims, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4917 

To amend title V of the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Minority 

Fellowship Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend title V of the Public Health Service Act to 

reauthorize the Minority Fellowship Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Minority Fellowship 

5 Program Reauthorization Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF MINORITY FELLOWSHIP 

7 PROGRAM. 

8 Section 597(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 297ll(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘$12,669,000 for 

10 each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022’’ and inserting 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4917 IS

1 ‘‘$25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 

2 2027’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
----

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of First National Power Corporation, aDelaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year endingDecember 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Peter Wanner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 ***/s/ Peter Wanner
____________________***
Peter Wanner

Dated: Feb 21, 2006
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opini o n

should not be published except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 95-30330 Summary Calendar

_______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

BRIAN KEITH SCOTT,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

(94-84)

_________________________
June 27, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Brian Scott challenges his sentence for possession with intent

to distribute cocaine base. He argues that the statutory penalties

for cocaine base and cocaine offenses are sufficiently ambiguous as

to warrant the application of the rule of lenity. We have recently

decided this issue adversely to Scott’s contentions. S ee, e.g.,2

United States v. Martin

, No. 95-30335 (5th Cir. Feb. 5, 1996) (per

curiam) (unpublished); United Stztes v. Lewis

, No. 95-60131 (5th

Cir. Oct. 19. 1995) (per curiam) ( unpublished); U nited States v.

Lampkin , No. 95-30131 (5th Cir. Aug. 25, 1995) (unpublished).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22269]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (04-110)]


Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the Aerospace Safety 
Advisory Panel.

DATES: Thursday, October 21, 2004, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. central time.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be conducted via teleconference; hence 
participation will require contacting Ms. Susan M. Burch on (202) 358-
0914 before noon eastern, October 20, 2004, and providing your name, 
affiliation, and phone number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark D. Erminger, Aerospace Safety 
Advisory Panel Executive Director, Code Q-1, National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-0914.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel will 
hold its Quarterly Meeting. This meeting will be open to the public up 
to the capability of the teleconferencing system. This discussion is 
pursuant to carrying out its statutory duties for which the Panel 
reviews, identifies, evaluates, and advises on those program 
activities, systems, procedures, and management activities that can 
contribute to program risk. Priority is given to those programs that 
involve the safety of human flight. The major subjects covered will be: 
Space Shuttle Program, International Space Station Program, and Cross-
Program Areas. The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel is composed of nine 
members and one ex-officio member.
    Any member of the public is permitted to file a written statement 
with the Panel at the time of the meeting. Presentations and written 
comments should be limited to the subject of safety in NASA. To do so, 
please contact Ms. Susan Burch on (202) 358-0914 at least 24 hours in 
advance.

R. Andrew Falcon,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-22269 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
#### § 3472.1 Qualifications.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Reza Zarif, certify that:



1.   I  have  reviewed  this  annual  report  of  Probe Manufacturing,  Inc.;



2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

a  material  fact  or  omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the

statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements

were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the period covered by this

report;



3.   Based on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial

information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in  all material

respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this report;



4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined

in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such

disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our

supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the

registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to

us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in

which  this  report  is  being  prepared;



b)   evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure

controls  and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions

about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as

of  the  end  of  the  period  covered  by  this  report based on such

evaluation;  and



c)   disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal

control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's

most  recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in

the  case  of  an  annual  report) that has materially affected, or is

reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the registrant's internal

control  over  financial  reporting;  and



5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to

the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board

of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):



a)   all significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the

design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which

are  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and



b)   any fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management or

other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the registrant's

internal  control  over  financial  reporting.







DATED  this  26th day  of  March 2007.





/s/  Reza Zarif

__________________________

Reza Zarif

Chief  Executive  Officer  and

Director
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: March 31, 2006



/s/ DAVID S. SMITHDavid S. Smith President and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is
not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The foregoing certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59135-59136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22273]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-04-116]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Connecticut River, CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a 
temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations for the 
Amtrak Old Saybrook-Old Lyme Bridge, mile 3.4, across the Connecticut 
River, Connecticut. This deviation from the regulations allows the 
bridge to remain closed from 9 p.m. on October 5, 2004 through 9 a.m. 
on October 6, 2004, and from 9 p.m. on October 6, 2004 through 9 a.m. 
on October 7, 2004. This deviation is necessary in order to facilitate 
necessary inspection and repairs at the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective from October 5, 2004 through October 
7, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First 
Coast Guard District, at (212) 668-7195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Old Saybrook-Old Lyme, at mile 3.4, 
across the Connecticut River has a vertical clearance in the closed 
position of 19 feet at mean high water and 22 feet at mean low water. 
The existing drawbridge operating regulations are listed at 33 CFR 
117.205(b).
    The owner of the bridge, Amtrak, requested a temporary deviation 
from the drawbridge operating regulations to facilitate inspection and 
maintenance repairs at the bridge.
    This deviation to the operating regulations allows the Old 
Saybrook-Old Lyme Bridge to remain closed from 9 p.m. on October 5, 
2004 through 9 a.m. on October 6, 2004, and from 9 p.m. on October 6, 
2004 through 9 a.m. on October 7, 2004.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed 
with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as 
soon as possible.

[[Page 59136]]

This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 
CFR 117.35.

    Dated: September 17, 2004.
David P. Pekoske,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 04-22273 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
Docket Number: FAA-2012-1311
#### Gatlin *v.*Peacock.

January 11, 1911.

Ejectment. Before Charles P. Hansell, judge pro hac vice. Thomas superior court. November *29,*1909.

*Roscoe Luke,*for plaintiff in error.

*Pondren Mitchell*and *J. H. Merrill,*contra.

Evans, P. J.

1. There was no abuse of discretion in refusing a continuance to the defendant.

2. In an action of complaint for land by the widow of a vendee against the vendor in possession, profert in evidence of a deed from the vendor to the vendee, conveying the premises, and testimony that the plaintiff is the widow and sole heir at law of the vendee, who died leaving no debts and upon whose estate there is no administration, makes out a prima facie case for the plaintiff. Powell on Actions for Land, § 384. Civil Code § 3355.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 695

 696

 418

 263

 246

 252

 257

 290

 291

 293

 300

 324

 346

 353

 354

 309

 279

 239

 236

 200

 182

 172

 162

 182

 187

 181

 185

 187

 175

 175

 167

 647

 437

 265

 248

 241

 243

 248

 258

 285

 282

 284

 301

 321

 343

 304

 282

 240

 218

 200

 174

 172

 152

 152

 163

 181

 178

 172

 174

 165

 162

 144

 684

 608

 307

 256

 243

 247

 252

 279

 288

 286

 290

 312

 334

 347

 326

 301

 254

 224

 221

 183

 178

 159

 155

 174

 185

 179

 177

 179

 169

 170

 153

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 20,425

 20,626

 20,498

 20,256

 19,917

 19,543

 19,170

 18,821

 18,470

 18,101

 17,695

 17,300

 16,902

 16,503

 16,080

 15,632

 15,139

 14,577

 13,996

 13,402

 12,868

 12,320

 11,758

 11,201

 10,668

 10,133

 9,601

 9,048

 8,482

 7,967

 7,436

 681

 688

 683

 675

 664

 651

 639

 627

 616

 603

 590

 577

 563

 550

 536

 521

 505

 486

 467

 447

 429

 411

 392

 373

 356

 338

 320

 302

 283

 266

 248

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### § 4.336 Docketing.

An appeal shall be assigned a docket number by the Board 20 days after receipt of the notice of appeal unless the Board has been properly notified that the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs has assumed jurisdiction over the appeal. A notice of docketing shall be sent to all interested parties as shown by the record on appeal upon receipt of the administrative record. Any objection to the record as constituted shall be filed with the Board within 15 days of receipt of the notice of docketing. The docketing notice shall specify the time within which briefs shall be filed, cite the procedural regulations governing the appeal and include a copy of the Table of Contents furnished by the deciding official.
Press Office

U.S. Department of Homeland 

Security

www.uscis.gov

Press Release October 1, 2004

USCIS ANNOUNCES NEW H-1B PROCEDURES – REACHES CAP

Washington, D.C.– U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that it has received 

enough H-1B petitions to meet the congressionally-mandated cap for fiscal year 2005. Congress has set an 

annual H-1B cap of 65,000 of which 6,800 are set aside for the H-1B1 program under terms of the U.S.-Chile 

and U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreements. The total H-1B cap number available for FY 2005 is therefore 

58,200. USCIS has factored into its count of petitions subject to the FY05 cap the number of Chile/Singapore 

set-asides that were unused in FY2004 and any other cases that can be counted against the previous fiscal year’s 

H-1B cap rather than the FY 2005 cap. USCIS has received enough petitions to reach the limit for FY 2005. 

After today, USCIS will not accept any new H-1B petitions that are subject to the FY 2005 annual cap.

For the remainder of FY 2005, USCIS will follow the procedures set forth in the notice published on

February 25, 2004 in the Federal Register at 69 FR 8675 to address the cap reached during FY 2004. Those 

procedures include:

• USCIS will process all petitions filed for first-time employment received by the end of business today.

• USCIS will return all petitions for first-time employment subject to the annual cap received after the end 

of business today.

• Returned petitions will be accompanied by the filing fee.

• Petitioners may re-submit their petitions when H-1B visas become available for FY 2006. 

• The earliest date a petitioner may file a petition requesting FY 2006 H-1B employment with an 

employment start date of October 1, 2005, would be April 1, 2005.

USCIS plans to provide further details on these procedures in a new notice that will be published in the Federal 

Register shortly.

Petitions for current H-1B workers do not count towards the congressionally mandated H-1B cap. Accordingly, 

USCIS will continue to process petitions filed to:

• Extend the amount of time a current H-1B worker may remain in the United States

• Change the terms of employment for current H-1B workers

• Allow current H-1B workers to change employers

• Allow current H-1B workers to work concurrently in a second H-1B position

USCIS also notes that petitions for new H-1B employment are not subject to the annual cap if the alien will be 

employed at an institution of higher education or a related or affiliated nonprofit entity, or at a nonprofit 

research organization or a governmental research organization.
- USCIS -

On March 1, 2003, U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services became one of three legacy INS components to join the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. USCIS is 

charged with fundamentally transforming and improving the delivery of immigration and citizenship services, 

while enhancing our nation's security.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEquivalent Linearization Analysis of Geometrically Nonlinear Random Vibrations Using Commercial Finite Element CodesTwo new equivalent linearization implementations for geometrically nonlinear random vibrations are presented. Both implementations are based upon a novel approach for evaluating the nonlinear stiffness within commercial finite element codes and are suitable for use with any finite element code having geometrically nonlinear static analysis capabilities. The formulation includes a traditional force-error minimization approach and a relatively new version of a potential energy-error minimization approach, which has been generalized for multiple degree-of-freedom systems. Results for a simply supported plate under random acoustic excitation are presented and comparisons of the displacement root-mean-square values and power spectral densities are made with results from a nonlinear time domain numerical simulation.Document ID20020068041Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsRizzi, Stephen A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Muravyov, Alexander A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 2002Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:211761NASA/TP-2002-211761L-18219Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-2294PROJECT: RTOP 522-63-11-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020068041.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §5177. Other provisions relating to bonds

#### (a) General provisions relating to bonds

The provisions of section 5551 shall be applicable to the bonds required by or given under sections 5173 and 5175.

#### (b) Cross references

**(1) For deposit of United States bonds or notes in lieu of sureties, see section 9303 of title 31, United States Code.**

**(2) For penalty and forfeiture for failure or refusal to give bond, or for giving false, forged, or fraudulent bond, or carrying on the business of a distiller without giving bond, see sections 5601(a)(4), 5601(a)(5), 5601(b), and 5615(3).**

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1353; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1905(b)(6)(B), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1823; Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(a)(17), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 282; Pub. L. 97–258, §3(f)(3), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1064.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5177, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 628, related to "conditions of approval of distiller's bond", prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859. See section 5173(b)(1) of this title.

Prior section 5177(a) was a general provision. See section 5171(a) of this title.

Prior section 5177(b)(1) to (3) related to ownership, consent of owner, or indemnity bond. See section 5173(b)(1)(A) to (C) of this title.

Prior section 5177(b)(4) related to judicial sale. See section 5173(b)(3) of this title.

Prior section 5177(c) related to situation of distillery. See sections 5173(b)(1) and 5551(c) of this title.

Prior section 5177(d) was a cross reference to penalty for improper approval of distiller's bond, and to general provisions relating to approval, disapproval and appeal on bonds. See subsec. (a) of this section and section 5551 of this title.

Provisions similar to those comprising subsec. (b) of this section were contained in prior sections 5176(e) and 5232(d), act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 630, 644, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1982—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 97–258 substituted "section 9303 of title 31, United States Code" for "6 U.S.C. 15".

1979—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–39 struck out ", 5174," after "sections 5173".

1976—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 94–455 substituted "5601(b)" for "5601(b)(2)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 810 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–455 effective on first day of first month which begins more than 90 days after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1905(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 5005 of this title.