alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**NSIAD-00-142**                      Published: May 16, 2000. Publicly Released: May 16, 2000.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

GAO followed up on its previous report on the status of China's World Trade Organization (WTO) membership negotiations, focusing on the: (1) results of the November 1999 bilateral Agreement on Market Access between China and the United States; and (2) status of China's ongoing multilateral negotiations in the WTO.

## Full Report

Full Report (54 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

International Affairs

Foreign governmentsForeign trade agreementsForeign trade policiesInternational economic relationsInternational organizationsInternational tradeGovernment subsidiesTariffsGrain and grain productsImport quotas
#### § 3216.12 When does a transferee take responsibility for lease obligations?

After BLM approves your transfer, the transferee is responsible for performing all lease obligations accruing after the date of the transfer, and for plugging and abandoning wells which exist and are not plugged and abandoned at the time of the transfer.
#### **EXHIBIT 32.1**

#### ** **

**LIQUIDMETAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.**

**SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the “company”) on Form 10–K/Afor the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, John Kang, Chairman/ President / Chief Executive Officer, and Young J. Ham, Chief FinancialOfficer, of the company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the company.

 

 
| Date: May 9,  2005 | By:    | /s/ John  Kang              |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | John Kang                   |
|                    |   | Chairman, President and CEO |
|                    |   |                        |
| Date: May 9,  2005 | By:    | /s/ Young J.  Ham           |   |
|                    |   | Young J. Ham                |
|                    |   | CFO                         |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LiquidmetalTechnologies, Inc. and will be retained by Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
IRR 2013 Sch B-3B F.Z17.xlsm

11/21/2014 CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

SCHEDULE OF IRRIGATION VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS TO BE APPLIED IN FY 2014 ACCO

(REFLECTED IN 2015 DEFICIT/CONSTRUCTION RATES)

A B C D E F

Voluntary Voluntary Payments

Date Payments Deficit to Construction 

Facility/Contractor Received Applied to in FY 2014 Sch A-6B to Sch A-2B T

ref 

$ 

Cross Valley Canal

Hills Valley ID 3/25/2014 2011 3,715.00 $ 

Hills Valley ID 4/11/2014 2011 209.45 $ 

Tri-Valley Valley ID 3/25/2014 2011 47,935.00 47,935.00 $ 

Tri-Valley Valley ID 4/11/2014 2011 2,739.69 2,739.69 $ 

Total Cross Valley Canal $ 54,599.14 $ 50,674.69 $ 

Sacramento River - Shasta $ 

Gjermann, Hal 05/09/14 1999 - 2009 35.88 35.88

Sacramento River- Willows

Alexander, Thomas 03/31/14 2006/2007 $ 17.25 $ 17.25 $ 

Cranmore Farms, LLC 09/25/2014 1988-2013 $ 75,624.59 $ 75,624.59 $ Hale, J/Marks, A 05/13/14 2014 $ 625.99 $ 

Total Sacramento River - Willows $ 76,267.83 $ 75,641.84 $ 

$ 

Tehama Colusa Canal

Dunnigan WD 1/ 08/25/14 2014 $ 

$ 

Total Tehama Colusa Canal $ - $ - $ - $ 

Total $ 130,902.85 $ 126,352.41 $ - $ 

Footnotes:1/ Contractor requested their FY 2013 water overpayment be applied to FY 2014 O&M expenses.
§ 2806.11 How will BLM charge me rent? ( a ) BLM will charge rent beginning on the first day of the month following the effective date of the grant through the last day of the month when the grant terminates. *Example:* If a grant became effective on January 10 and terminated on September 16, the rental period would be February 1 through September 30, or 8 months.
( b ) BLM will set or adjust the annual billing periods to coincide with the calendar year by prorating the rent based on 12 months.
( c ) If you disagree with the rent that BLM charges, you may appeal the decision under § 2801.10 of this part.
### §2. Duties of Commissioner

The Commissioner of Indian Affairs shall, under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior, and agreeably to such regulations as the President may prescribe, have the management of all Indian affairs and of all matters arising out of Indian relations.

(R.S. §463.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §463 derived from acts July 9, 1832, ch. 174, §1, 4 Stat. 564; July 27, 1868, ch. 259, §1, 15 Stat. 228.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

All supervisory and appellate powers and duties in regard to Indian affairs theretofore vested in Secretary of the Treasury were thereafter to be exercised and performed by Secretary of the Interior under provisions of section 1 of act July 27, 1868, ch. 259, 15 Stat. 228.

Appointment by President of a Commissioner of Indian Affairs to act under direction of Secretary of War was provided for by section 1 of act July 9, 1832, ch. 174, 4 Stat. 564.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Tuesday 5th December, 1995.

George Rodney Jennings, Jr., Appellant, against Record No. 0424-93-4 Circuit Court No. CR8063 Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee.

Upon Rehearing En Banc Before Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton

Paul A. Maslakowski (Campbell & Maslakowski, on brief), for appellant. Margaret Ann B. Walker, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

By opinion dated March 14, 1995, a majority of a panel of this Court affirmed George Rodney Jennings, Jr.'s convictions of abduction with the intent to defile and forcible sodomy. Jennings v.

Commonwealth , 20 Va. App. 9, 454 S.E.2d 752 (1995). On Jennings' motion, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted rehearing

en banc . Upon such rehearing, the stay of this Court's March 14, 1995 mandate is lifted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for those reasons set forth in the panel's majority opinion. Judge Benton would reverse the judgment of the trial court for those reasons set forth in the panel's dissenting opinion. See

id. at 19-21, 454 S.E.2d at 757 (Barrow, J., dissenting).It is ordered that the trial court allow counsel for the appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered the appellant on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel's costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. The Commonwealth shall recover of the appellant the amount paid court-appointed counsel to represent him in this proceeding, counsel's costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses, and the fees and costs to be assessed by the clerk of this Court and the clerk

of the trial court. This order shall be published and certified to the trial

court. A Copy,

Teste: Richard R. James, Clerk By: Deputy Clerk
#### Bart Horan, Defendant in Error, v. Cooke Brewing Company et al. Cooke Brewing Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 16,254.

Writs of *error*— when *dismissal will be ordered.*Where one defendant sues out a writ of error and makes the plaintiff below the only defendant in error and takes no steps whatever to summon or sever his co-defendants in the cause, a dismissal of the writ will be ordered.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John C. Scovel, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1910.

Dismissed.

Opinion filed March 13, 1912.

E. F. Masterson, for plaintiff in error.

Carl A. Ross, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

Bart Horan, a minor, by Katherine Horan, his next friend, in an action to recover for injury to his means of support, brought under section 9 of the act entitled Dram-Shops, recovered a verdict and judgment for $1,000 in the Municipal Court against John Flynn, William Duggan, Michael'P. Duggan and the Cooke Brewing Company, a corporation. The Cooke Brewing Company alone sues out this writ of error wherein it makes the plaintiff below the only defendant in er*56ror, and no steps whatever have been taken to summons and sever the other defendants in the court below. In such state of the record this writ of error must be, and accordingly is, dismissed. McIntyre v. Sholty, 139 Ill. 171; Bellinger v. Barnes, 221 Ill. 240; Wuerzburger v. Wuerzburger, 221 Ill. 277.

*Writ of error dismissed.*
#### § 3502.33 If I represent an applicant as an attorney-in-fact, do I have to submit anything to BLM?

Yes. Send us evidence of your authority to act on behalf of the applicant, and a statement of the applicant's qualifications and acreage holdings if you are empowered to make this statement. Otherwise, the applicant must send us this information separately.
### **Subchapter B—Proceedings by Taxpayers and Third Parties**

Sec.
7421.
Prohibition of suits to restrain assessment or collection.
7422.
Civil actions for refund.
7423.
Repayments to officers or employees.
7424.
Intervention.
7425.
Discharge of liens.
7426.
Civil actions by persons other than taxpayers.
7427.
Tax return preparers.
7428.
Declaratory judgments relating to status and classification of organizations under section 501(c)(3), etc.
7429.
Review of jeopardy levy or assessment procedures.
7430.
Awarding of costs and certain fees.
7431.
Civil damages for unauthorized inspection or disclosure of returns and return information.
7432.
Civil damages for failure to release lien.
7433.
Civil damages for certain unauthorized collection actions.
7433A.
Civil damages for certain unauthorized collection actions by persons performing services under qualified tax collection contracts.
7434.
Civil damages for fraudulent filing of information returns.
7435.
Civil damages for unauthorized enticement of information disclosure.
7436.
Proceedings for determination of employment status.
7437.
Cross references.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2007**—Pub. L. 110–28, title VIII, §8246(a)(2)(J)(ii), May 25, 2007, 121 Stat. 202, substituted "Tax return preparers" for "Income tax return preparers" in item 7427.

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §881(b)(2), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1626, added item 7433A.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–35, §3(d)(5), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1106, inserted "inspection or" before "disclosure" in item 7431.

Pub. L. 105–34, title XIV, §1454(b)(4), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1057, added items 7436 and 7437 and struck out former item 7436 "Cross references".

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–168, title VI, §601(b), title XII, §1203(b), July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1462, 1471, added items 7434 and 7435 and redesignated former item 7434 as 7436.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–647, title VI, §§6237(e)(4), 6239(c), 6240(b), 6241(c), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3743, 3746–3748, inserted "levy or" after "jeopardy" in item 7429, struck out "court" after "Awarding of" in item 7430, added items 7432 and 7433, and redesignated former item 7432 as 7434.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–248, title II, §292(d)(1), title III, §357(b)(3), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 574, 646, added items 7430 and 7431 and redesignated former item 7430 as 7432.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XII, §§1203(b)(2)(B), 1204(c)(13), title XIII, §1306(b)(6), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1690, 1699, 1719, added items 7427 to 7429 and redesignated former item 7427 as 7430.

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–719, title I, §110(d)(1), (2), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1145, inserted "and Third Parties" in subchapter heading, substituted "Intervention" for "Civil action to clear title to property" in item 7424, added items 7425 and 7426, and redesignated former item 7425 as 7427.
§ 3910.50 Surface use. Operations conducted under an exploration license must: ( a ) Not unreasonably interfere with or endanger any other lawful activity on the same lands;
( b ) Not damage any improvements on the lands; and
( c ) Comply with all applicable Federal, state, and local laws and regulations.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 8 OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on December 23, 2014, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Nicolas C. Flores, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-13-00548-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 355026

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the

trial court is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on March 31, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 338

 322

 323

 286

 274

 257

 245

 236

 226

 229

 215

 217

 222

 219

 233

 231

 219

 232

 263

 235

 215

 214

 213

 217

 217

 216

 222

 227

 239

 249

 265

 305

 291

 280

 265

 249

 236

 228

 216

 206

 203

 198

 194

 194

 196

 200

 204

 206

 207

 205

 208

 206

 203

 203

 201

 204

 200

 200

 203

 211

 223

 231

 317

 302

 293

 276

 261

 246

 236

 228

 216

 216

 206

 203

 203

 207

 213

 215

 212

 216

 215

 214

 211

 210

 209

 211

 210

 208

 207

 212

 221

 229

 238

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
§ 4.1112 Motions. ( a ) Except for oral motions made in proceedings on the record, or where the administrative law judge otherwise directs, each motion shall— ( 1 ) Be in writing; and
( 2 ) Contain a concise statement of supporting grounds.
( b ) Unless the administrative law judge or the Board orders otherwise, any party to a proceeding in which a motion is filed under paragraph (a) of this section shall have 15 days from service of the motion to file a statement in response.
( c ) Failure to make a timely motion or to file a statement in response may be construed as a waiver of objection.
( d ) An administrative law judge or the Board shall rule on all motions as expeditiously as possible.
RUSSIA'S ROAD TO CORRUPTION
How the Clinton Administration   Exported Government Instead of Free Enterprise and Failed the Russian   People
Exhibit
32


**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**


**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of the
registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-KSB")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the registrant.





Date:
April 13, 2005





Amanasu
Environment Corporation





_____________________


Atsushi
Maki


President
and


Principal
Financial Officer
#### Mildred Sibel, Respondent, v. Andrew Sibel, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### Cafe Goldman, Respondent, v. Abraham Margulies, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
#### § 3474.4 Qualified sureties.

A list of companies holding certificates of authority from the Secretary of the Treasury under the Act of July 30, 1947 (6 U.S.C. 6-14) as acceptable sureties on Federal bonds is published annually in the Federal Register.
### Subpart A—Interest on Tax Deferral

Sec.
1291.
Interest on tax deferral.
#### § 3862.1-4 Evidence relating to destroyed or lost records.

In the event of the mining records in any case having been destroyed by fire or otherwise lost, a statement of the fact should be made, and secondary evidence of possessory title will be received, which may consist of the statement of the claimant, supported by those of any other parties cognizant of the facts relative to his location, occupancy, possession, improvements, etc.; and in such case of lost records, any deeds, certificates of location or purchase, or other evidence which may be in the claimant's possession and tend to establish his claim, should be filed.
### §1621w. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10221(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 935

Section, Pub. L. 94–437, title II, §224, as added Pub. L. 102–573, title II, §217(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4559, authorized appropriations to carry out this subchapter through fiscal year 2000.

The repeal is based on section 101(b)(5) of title I of S. 1790, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, as reported by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate in Dec. 2009, which was enacted into law by section 10221(a) of Pub. L. 111–148.
#### Paul Drapkin, Appellant, v. Ryan Contracting Corporation, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

*858Hagarty, Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATion OFTHE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

I, Glen E. Shipley, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this reporton Form 10-Q of Internet Commerce Corporation;

2.             Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.               Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.              Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c.               Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting,, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a.               All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b.              Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 14, 2006
| By:    | /s/ Glen  E. Shipley     |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Glen E.  Shipley         |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****NIOSH pocket guide to chemicalhazards.**
 
2005 | 2007
 
SuDoc:HE 20.7108:C 42/
Item Number:0499-F-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001019772
 
October 25, 2017