alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2623. Taxable amount in case of direct skip

For purposes of this chapter, the taxable amount in the case of a direct skip shall be the value of the property received by the transferee.

(Added Pub. L. 99–514, title XIV, §1431(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2721.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to generation-skipping transfers (within the meaning of section 2611 of this title) made after Oct. 22, 1986, except as otherwise provided, see section 1433 of Pub. L. 99–514, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
#### Rose K. Oursler, Appellant, v. Charles E. Oursler, Respondent.

Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur; Cars-well, J., concurs in the result.
§ 4.1018 What are the requirements for motions? ( a ) *General.* Any party may apply for an order or ruling on any matter related to the hearing process by presenting a motion to the ALJ. A motion may be presented any time after DCHD issues the docketing notice. ( 1 ) A motion made at a hearing may be stated orally on the record, unless the ALJ directs that it be written.
( 2 ) Any other motion must: ( i ) Be in writing;
( ii ) Comply with the requirements of this subpart with respect to form, content, filing, and service; and
( iii ) Not exceed 10 pages, unless the ALJ orders otherwise.
( b ) *Content.* ( 1 ) Each motion must state clearly and concisely: ( i ) Its purpose and the relief sought;
( ii ) The facts constituting the grounds for the relief sought; and
( iii ) Any applicable statutory or regulatory authority.
( 2 ) A proposed order must accompany the motion.
( c ) *Response.* Except as otherwise required by this subpart or by order of the ALJ, any other party may file a response to a written motion within 14 days after service of the motion. When a party presents a motion at a hearing, any other party may present a response orally on the record.
( d ) *Reply.* Unless the ALJ orders otherwise, no reply to a response may be filed.
( e ) *Effect of filing.* Unless the ALJ orders otherwise, the filing of a motion does not stay the hearing process.
( f ) *Ruling.* The ALJ will rule on the motion as soon as feasible, either orally on the record or in writing. The ALJ may summarily deny any dilatory, repetitive, or frivolous motion.
### §786. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–76, §1, Aug. 29, 1967, 81 Stat. 177, which provided for the unclaimed and unpaid share of certain judgment funds to be deposited in the Treasury of the United States to the credit of the tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3731.1 Power rights retained in the United States. ( a ) The Act in the first proviso provides as follows: That all power rights to such lands shall be retained by the United States.
( 1 ) Under this proviso every patent issued for such a location must contain a reservation unto the United States, its permittees or licensees of the right to enter upon, occupy and use, any part of the lands for power purposes without any claim or right to compensation accruing to the locator or successor in interest from the occupation or use of any of the lands within the location, for such purposes. Furthermore, the patent will contain a provision that the United States, its permittees and licensees shall not be responsible or held liable or incur any liability for the damage, destruction, or loss of any mining claim, mill site, facility installed or erected, income, or other property or investments resulting from the actual use of such lands or portions thereof for power development at any time where such power development is made by or under the authority of the United States, except where such damage, destruction, or loss results from the negligence of the United States, its permittees and licensees.
[35 FR 9736, June 13, 1970]
---





Exhibit 13.1

CERT IFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Alberta Star Development Corp. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tim Coupland, Principal Executive and I, Ann-Marie Cederholm, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/ s / Tim Coupland                       
|Tim Coupland, Principal Executive Officer

April 4, 2008





|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/ s / Ann-Marie Cederholm                       
|Ann-Marie Cederholm, Principal Financial Officer

April 4, 2008



151



---
### §§215 to 220. Repealed. Pub. L. 88–597, §19(c), Sept. 15, 1964, 78 Stat. 953

Section 215, act Apr. 27, 1904, ch. 1618, §1, 33 Stat. 316, related to apprehension and detention of certain insane persons in District of Columbia.

Section 216, act Apr. 27, 1904, ch. 1618, §2, 33 Stat. 317, related to arrest at other than public places in District of Columbia.

Section 217, acts Apr. 27, 1904, ch. 1618, §3, 33 Stat. 317; July 1, 1916, ch. 209, 39 Stat. 309, related to temporary detention of alleged insane persons found in District of Columbia.

Section 218, acts Apr. 27, 1904, ch. 1618, §4, 33 Stat. 317; July 1, 1916, ch. 209, 39 Stat. 309, related to temporary commitment of persons found in District of Columbia to other hospital, or detention in police station.

Section 219, acts Apr. 27, 1904, ch. 1618, §5, 33 Stat. 318; Aug. 14, 1912, ch. 288, §1, 37 Stat. 309, related to certificate by physician as to sanity or insanity found in District of Columbia.

Section 220, act Apr. 27, 1904, ch. 1618, §6, 33 Stat. 318, related to making false affidavit or certificate.
#### Thomas R. Hart v. Blanche Walsh and Others.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present,— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Modoc Resource Advisory Committee, Alturas, California, USDA Forest Service.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committees Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Modoc National Forest's Modoc Resource Advisory Committee will meet Monday, November 1st, 2004, in                               ( print page 60351)                            Alturas, California for business meetings. The meetings are open to the public.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The business meeting November 1st begins at 6 p.m., at the Modoc National Forest Office, Conference Room, 800 West 12th St., Alturas. Agenda topics will include the final roll-call vote for a majority of the projects submitted for funding in fiscal year 2005. Time will also be set aside for public comments at the beginning of the meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stan Sylva, Forest Supervisor and Designated Federal Officer, at (530) 233-8700; or Public Affairs Officer Nancy Gardner at (530) 233-8713.

Stanley G. Sylva,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 04-22344 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

69–011 2017

115th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 115–67 

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY 

WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN TERRORIST ATTACKS 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTIFICATION THAT THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARED IN 

PROCLAMATION 7463, WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN TERRORIST 

ATTACKS ON THE UNITED STATES OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, IS 

TO CONTINUE FOR ONE YEAR BEYOND SEPTEMBER 14, 2017, 

PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d); PUBLIC LAW 94–412, SEC. 202(d); 

(90 STAT. 1257) 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2017.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed 


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 

1622(d), provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, within 90 days of the anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits 

to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue 

in effect beyond the anniversary date. Consistent with this provision, I have sent to the Federal Register the enclosed notice, stating 

that the emergency declared in Proclamation 7463 of September 

14, 2001, ‘‘National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks,’’ is to continue in effect beyond September 14, 2017. 

The threat of terrorism that resulted in the declaration of a national emergency on September 14, 2001, continues. The authorities that have been invoked under that declaration of a national 

emergency continue to be critical to the ability of the Armed Forces 

of the United States to perform essential missions in the United 

States and around the world to address the continuing threat of 

terrorism. For these reasons, I have determined that it is necessary 

to continue in effect the national emergency declared on September 

14, 2001, in response to certain terrorist attacks. 

DONALD J. TRUMP. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, September 11, 2017. 

(3) 

NOTICE

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO

CERTAIN TERRORIST ATTACKS

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 

50 U.S.C. 1622(d), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency previously declared on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 

7463, with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, 

and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the 

United States. 

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency 

declared on September 14, 2001, and the powers and authorities 

adopted to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2017. Therefore, I am continuing in effect for 

an additional year the national emergency declared on September 

14, 2001, in response to certain terrorist attacks. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. 

DONALD J. TRUMP. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, September 11, 2017. 

Æ
City of 

S W ~ ~ ~I~ LD City Council Members 

-

Ia_n_r_._s_a_n_fo_r_d _______________ c , District I, Waylon Huguley, Jr. 

Mayor District 2, Gary Scales ·entrr District 3, Ronnie McLeary 

District 4, Mary Stevens 

May 8, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

tfre ____________ D_i_str~i~ct_s_,_st_ev_e_n_R_._s_ta_n_Ie_y 

Shoals 

Reference: DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685,2009-0305,2000-7856 

EAS>Muscle Shoals, AL, Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS, 

and Tupelo, MS 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

The City of Sheffield in Sheffield, Alabama, wishes to lend its support to the proposal of Silver 

Airways to provide essential air service at Muscle Shoals, Alabama, as replacement for current 

Delta Air Lines service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air 

transportation system is critical to the economic well-being of Sheffield, Alabama, and to the 

City of Sheffield. We at the City of Sheffield rely on our local air service for both business and 

leisure travel. 

The Silver Airways proposals offer us a modem 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, 

which is not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure 

travel destination from Sheffield, Alabama, in its own right. 

We believe the Silver air service proposals represent the best option for retaining our local air 

service long-term and building up traffic so that government subsidies can eventually be reduced 

or eliminated. 

600 N. Montgomery Avenue • Post Office Box 380 • Sheffield, Alabama 35660 • (256) 383-0250 
-2-

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

May 8, 2012 

We urge the Department of Transportation to award Silver Airways the designation to provide 

Sheffield's essential air service. 

B~st r ards, ~ . '-\~~ Ian T. anford . 

Mayor 

CC: U.S. Representative Robert B. Aderholt 

U.S. Representative Mo Brooks 

U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions 

U.S. Senator Richard Shelby 

Governor Robert Bentley
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









I, Mitchell R. Miller, the Chief Executive Officer of Poly Shield Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(i)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











By:
/s/ Mitchell R. MillerName:
MITCHELL R. MILLERTitle:
Chief Executive Officer and PresidentDate:
September 10, 2012














A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6413 QUINTON LEE COOK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. HARLESS; MR. WINGLER; MR. HOLLOWAY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-96-7-5-MU) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 25, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Quinton Lee Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissingas frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the d istrict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cook v. Harless , No. CA-96-7-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 3809.551 What are my choices for providing BLM with a financial guarantee?

You must provide BLM with a financial guarantee using any of the 3 options in the following table:

| If— | Then— |
| --- | --- |
| (a) You have only one notice or plan of operations, or wish to provide a financial guarantee for a single notice or plan of operations | You may provide an individual financial guarantee that covers only the cost of reclaiming areas disturbed under the single notice or plan of operations. See §§ 3809.552 through 3809.556 for more information. |
| (b) You are currently operating under more than one notice or plan of operations | You may provide a blanket financial guarantee covering statewide or nationwide operations. See § 3809.560 for more information. |
| (c) You do not choose one of the options in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section | You may provide evidence of an existing financial guarantee under State law or regulations. See §§ 3809.570 through 3809.573 for more information. |
#### Onofrio Curro, Respondent, v. New York, Ontario and Western Railway Company, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### Patrick T. Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. Albert B. Tibbitts, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
Exhibit 32.3



Certification of Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John C. Wellons, the Chief Accounting Officer
of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JOHN C. WELLONSName:

John C. WellonsDate:

February 28, 2007
EXHIBIT
23.1




CONSENT
OF LAWRENCE SCHARFMAN & CO., CPA, P.C.








April 14,
2009





Board of
Directors


Global
Entertainment Holdings, Inc.


2375 E.
Tropicana Ave., #8-259


Las
Vegas, Nevada 89119





Gentlemen:







We hereby
consent to the use of our audit report of Global Entertainment Holdings for the
year ended December 31, 2008, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2008.





/s/ Lawrence Scharfman
& Co., CPA,
P.C.


Lawrence Scharfman & Co., CPA,
P.C.
### **Subchapter D—Failure by Certain Charitable Organizations To Meet Certain Qualification Requirements**

Sec.
4958.
Taxes on excess benefit transactions.
4959.
Taxes on failures by hospital organizations.
4960.
Tax on excess tax-exempt organization executive compensation.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter D, consisting of sections 4961 to 4963 of this title, was redesignated subchapter E.

#### Amendments

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13602(b), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2159, added item 4960.

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–148, title IX, §9007(b)(2), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 857, added item 4959.
§ 3420.1-2 Call for coal resource and other resource information. ( a ) Prior to or as part of the initiation or update of a land use plan or land use analysis, a Call for Coal and Other Resource Information shall be made to formally solicit indications of interest and information on coal resource development potential and on other resources which may be affected by coal development for lands in the planning unit. Industry, State and local governments and the general public may submit information on lands that should be considered for coal leasing, including statements describing why the lands should be considered for leasing.
( b ) Proprietary data marked as confidential may be submitted in response to the Call for Coal and Other Resource Information, however, all such proprietary data shall be submitted to the authorized officer only. Data marked as confidential shall be treated in accordance with the laws and regulations governing the confidentiality of such information.
( c ) The Call for Coal and Other Resource Information may be combined with the notice of intent to conduct land use planning published in accordance with § 1601.3(g) of this title or with the issue identification process in accordance with part 1600 of this title. If the agency conducting land use planning is other than the Bureau of Land Management, that agency may combine the Call for Coal and Other Resource Information with its land use planning process at the appropriate step.
[47 FR 33136, July 30, 1982, as amended at 50 FR 8626, Mar. 4, 1985; 51 FR 18888, May 23, 1986]
Case 1:20-cv-21773-FAM Document 25-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/11/2021 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:20-cv-21773-FAM Document 25-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/11/2021 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:20-cv-21773-FAM Document 25-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/11/2021 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:20-cv-21773-FAM Document 25-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/11/2021 Page 4 of 4