alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 35.37 Initial decision. ( a ) The ALJ shall issue an initial decision based only on the record, which shall contain findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the amount of any penalties and assessments imposed.
( b ) The findings of fact shall include a finding on each of the following issues: ( 1 ) Whether the claims or statements identified in the complaint, or any portions thereof, violate § 35.3 of this part;
( 2 ) If the person is liable for penalties or assessments, the appropriate amount of any such penalties or assessments considering any mitigating or aggravating factors that he or she finds in the case, such as those described in § 35.31 of this part.
( c ) The ALJ shall promptly serve the initial decision on all parties within 90 days after the time for submission of post-hearing briefs and reply briefs (if permitted) has expired. The ALJ shall at the same time serve all parties with a statement describing the right of any defendant determined to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment to file a motion for reconsideration with the ALJ or a notice of appeal with the Director. If the ALJ fails to meet the deadline contained in this paragraph, he or she shall notify the parties of the reason for the delay and shall set a new deadline.
( d ) Unless the initial decision of the ALJ is timely appealed to the Secretary, or a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision is timely filed, the initial decision shall constitute the final decision of the Department and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after it is issued by the ALJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Annual Report of GlobeTrac Inc. (GlobeTrac) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jim Pratt, President and Chief Executive Officer of GlobeTrac and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Jim Pratt
 Jim Pratt
 Chief Executive Officer
 March 29, 2004
   
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Annual Report of GlobeTrac Inc. (GlobeTrac) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John daCosta, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of GlobeTrac and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ John daCosta
 John daCosta
 Chief Financial Officer
 March 29, 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 491

 552

 552

 659

 741

 838

 658

 643

 693

 747

 665

 697

 707

 601

 650

 609

 556

 582

 625

 687

 616

 644

 661

 664

 622

 560

 498

 575

 544

 597

 701

 437

 445

 461

 474

 475

 487

 480

 443

 433

 417

 397

 391

 386

 396

 403

 386

 366

 356

 349

 345

 340

 335

 332

 326

 319

 319

 317

 324

 326

 337

 345

 466

 473

 497

 530

 546

 558

 519

 487

 482

 476

 459

 486

 474

 460

 472

 458

 400

 394

 405

 397

 385

 377

 380

 371

 366

 357

 346

 366

 365

 391

 439

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
(No. 770

Claimant awarded $333.75.)

#### St. Joseph’s Hospital of Belvidere, Ill., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion, filed May 14, 1924.*

Social justice and *equity*— eleemosynary *corporation*— award *may he made.*Where no objection is made by the State, and the circumstances of the case warrant it, the court may recommend an award upon the ground of social justice and equity.

Alexander J. Strom, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim brought by St. Joseph’s Hospital of Belvidere, Illinois, an eleemosynary corporation, organized under *16the laws of the State of Illinois, for services rendered one Eev. Alfred Bruhn, who, together with members of his family, was brought to the hospital by a Dr. Hartman of Garden Prairie, Illinois. It appears that the said Alfred Bruhn was driving a Ford automobile on the Grant highway near the Village of Garden Prairie, located in Boone County, Illinois, on or about September 1, 1923. It further appears that an army truck under the control of the National Guard unit drove against the Ford automobile of the said Eev. Bruhn and caused the Eev. Bruhn and members of his family injuries which they sustained and that the accident was without fault of the Eev. Bruhn. After the Eev. Bruhn sustained the injuries he and his family were taken to the hospital, receiving care and treatment there,' upon which this-claim was based. It further appears that the claim has been referred to Adjutant General C. E. Black of Springfield, who referred it to the Attorney General of this State.

The Attorney General, coming into court and alleging that the claim had been thoroughly investigated finder the direction of the adjutant general of the State of Illinois, and as the result of such investig'ation, states that the claim is just and entitled to compensation in the sum of $333.75.

It is therefore recommended- by the court that said claimant be allowed the sum of $333.75.
§ 4.1196 Summary disposition. ( a ) In a proceeding under this section where the permittee fails to appear at a hearing, the permittee shall be deemed to have waived his right to a hearing and the administrative law judge may assume for purposes of the proceeding that— ( 1 ) Each violation listed in the order occurred;
( 2 ) Such violations were caused by the permittee's unwarranted failure or were willfully caused; and
( 3 ) A pattern of violations exists.
( b ) In order to issue an initial decision concerning suspension or revocation of the permit when the permittee fails to appear at the hearing, the administrative law judge shall either conduct an ex parte hearing or require OSM to furnish proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.
[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978. Redesignated at 67 FR 61510, Oct. 1, 2002]
#### § 3203.12 What fees must I pay to nominate lands?

Submit with your nomination a filing fee for nominations of lands as found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter.
### §3104. Management of Indian forest land

#### (a) Management activities

The Secretary shall undertake forest land management activities on Indian forest land, either directly or through contracts, cooperative agreements, or grants under the Indian Self-Determination Act [25 U.S.C. 5321 et seq.].

#### (b) Management objectives

Indian forest land management activities undertaken by the Secretary shall be designed to achieve the following objectives—

(1) the development, maintenance, and enhancement of Indian forest land in a perpetually productive state in accordance with the principles of sustained yield and with the standards and objectives set forth in forest management plans by providing effective management and protection through the application of sound silvicultural and economic principles to—

(A) the harvesting of forest products,

(B) forestation,

(C) timber stand improvement, and

(D) other forestry practices;

(2) the regulation of Indian forest lands through the development and implementation, with the full and active consultation and participation of the appropriate Indian tribe, of forest management plans which are supported by written tribal objectives and forest marketing programs;

(3) the regulation of Indian forest lands in a manner that will ensure the use of good method and order in harvesting so as to make possible, on a sustained yield basis, continuous productivity and a perpetual forest business;

(4) the development of Indian forest lands and associated value-added industries by Indians and Indian tribes to promote self-sustaining communities, so that Indians may receive from their Indian forest land not only stumpage value, but also the benefit of all the labor and profit that such Indian forest land is capable of yielding;

(5) the retention of Indian forest land in its natural state when an Indian tribe determines that the recreational, cultural, aesthetic, or traditional values of the Indian forest land represents the highest and best use of the land;

(6) the management and protection of forest resources to retain the beneficial effects to Indian forest lands of regulating water run-off and minimizing soil erosion; and

(7) the maintenance and improvement of timber productivity, grazing, wildlife, fisheries, recreation, aesthetic, cultural and other traditional values.

(Pub. L. 101–630, title III, §305, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4535.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Indian Self-Determination Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is title I of Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2206, which is classified principally to subchapter I (§5321 et seq.) of chapter 46 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.
### Subpart C—Storage

Sec.
5231.
Entry for deposit.
5232.
Imported distilled spirits.
[5233, 5234. Repealed.]
5235.
Bottling of alcohol for industrial purposes.
5236.
Discontinuance of storage facilities and transfer of distilled spirits.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1979**—Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(b)(6), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 290, substituted "Entry for deposit" for "Entry for deposit in storage" in item 5231 and struck out items 5233 "Bottling of distilled spirits in bond" and 5234 "Mingling and blending of distilled spirits".
§ 3465.2-2 Discovery of noncompliance. ( a ) Upon discovery of activities or conditions that are not in compliance with the terms of a lease or license to mine, or with an approved permit (30 CFR part 741), but that do not pose a serious and imminent danger to the public or to resources and environmental quality, the authorized officer shall refer the matter to the Surface Mining Officer for remedial action, or take remedial action on matters of exploration outside the permit area.
( b ) Upon discovery of activities or conditions that are not in compliance with the terms of a lease, license to mine, or with an approved permit and that do pose a serious and imminent danger to the health and safety of the public or to resources and environmental quality, the authorized officer may order the immediate cessation of the activities or conditions provided that the Surface Mining Officer is immediately informed of the issuance of any such emergency cessation order.
[44 FR 42638, July 19, 1979. Redesignated at 47 FR 33149, July 30, 1982; 50 FR 8627, Mar. 4, 1985]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 360

 342

 360

 339

 331

 338

 342

 342

 344

 342

 344

 349

 377

 350

 379

 364

 359

 354

 358

 367

 366

 353

 358

 372

 372

 381

 379

 378

 371

 376

 310

 310

 310

 310

 312

 311

 311

 312

 311

 312

 311

 317

 321

 322

 319

 322

 324

 323

 324

 324

 325

 325

 324

 320

 324

 324

 324

 324

 323

 326

 328

 322

 323

 320

 319

 320

 320

 321

 323

 322

 324

 330

 338

 330

 338

 337

 336

 336

 338

 341

 343

 338

 337

 339

 344

 348

 344

 340

 342

 343

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Visitor Activities        - Visitor Activities
        - Auto Tours
        - Bird Watching
        - Canoeing
        - Fishing
        - Hiking
        - Hunting
        - JCS Canoe Trail (PDF)
        - JCS Map (PDF)
        - Souris River Loop Bird List (PDF)
        - USFWS Offices in ND (PDF)

## Hunting

The Refuge offers a quality hunting experience for deer, moose, turkey, grouse, partridge, pheasant, fox, and waterfowl.

Hunting Regulations brochureWPA Public Use Regulations brochureNorth Dakota Game & Fish Department
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1069

ANTHONY C. CALLAHAM , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Defendant

- Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 9:16

- cv - 03591

- TMC )

Submitted : November 27, 2018 Decided: December 21, 2018

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Donald L. Pilzer, DON PILZER LAW, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Beth Drake, United States Attorney, Barbara M. Bowens, Assistant United States At torney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina; Nora Koch, Regional Chief Counsel, Taryn Jasner, Supervisory Attorney, Kristina C.E. Cole, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , for A ppellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony C. Callaham appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Calla ham’s application for disability insurance benefits. “In social security proceedings, a court of appeals applies the same standard of review as does the district court. That is, a reviewing court must uphold the determination when an ALJ has applied corr ect legal standards and the ALJ’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.” Brown v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin. , 873 F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 2017) ( citation and internal quotation marks omitted). We have reviewed the administrative record, i ncluding the transcript of Callaham’s hearing before the ALJ, in conjunction with Callaham’s brief on appeal, and find no error. Specifically, despite Callaham’s assertion to the contrary, we conclude the ALJ applied the correct legal standard * in evaluat ing Callaham’s subjective claim s as to the intensity, persistence, and effect of his pain. S ee Ladda v. Berryhill , No. 17

- 1366, 2018 WL 5096065, at *4 (4th Cir. Oct. 18, 2018) (argued but unpublished)

. We also reject Callaham ’s challenge to the standard employed by the district court in conducting its review of the ALJ’s ruling

. A ccord Ealy v. Comm ’ r of Soc. Sec. , 594 F.3d 504, 512 (6th Cir. 2010) (recognizing that the court of appeals reviews a district court’s decision in a social security case “de novo,” but that the appellate court’s “ review is limited to

* See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529(b)

- (c) (2018).3 determining whether the Commissioner’s decision is supp orted by substantial evidence and was made pursuant to proper legal standards” (internal quotation marks omitted) )

. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment upholding the denial of benefits. See Callaham v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin. , No. 9: 16

- cv - 03591

- TMC (D.S.C. Dec. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. Gotham Silk Hosiery Company, Inc.

Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Changes to Section IV of the Field Office 
Technical Guide (FOTG) of the Natural Resources Conservation Service in 
Indiana

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in Section IV of the 
FOTG of the NRCS in Indiana for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRCS in Indiana to issue ten (10) 
revised and two (2) new conservation practice standards in Section IV 
of the FOTG. The revised standards are: Conservation Crop Rotation 
(328), Residue Management, Mulch-Till (329B), Residue Management, 
Ridge-Till (329C), Contour Buffer Strip (322), Residue Management, 
Seasonal (344), Riparian Forest Buffer (391), Recreation Land Grading 
and Shaping (566), Recreation Trail and Walkway (568), Nutrient 
Management (590), and Subsurface Drain (606). The new standards are: 
Cross Wind Trap Strips (589C) and Interim Standard Agrichemical 
Handling Facility (702). These practices may be used in conservation 
systems that treat highly erodible land and/or wetlands.

DATES: Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with 
the date of this publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Address all requests and comments to 
Jane E. Hardisty, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation 
Service (NRCS), 6013 Lakeside Blvd., Indianapolis, Indiana 46278; 
telephone: 317-290-3200. Copies of this standard will be made available 
upon written request. You may submit your electronic requests and 
comments to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2266435050474e4e0c40504d554c624b4c0c575146430c454d54"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3c785d4e4e595050125e4e534b527c555212494f585d125b534a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that after enactment of the 
law, revisions made to NRCS state technical guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law, shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS 
in Indiana will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. 
Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in 
Indiana regarding disposition of those comments and a final 
determination of changes will be made.

    Dated: January 21, 2004.
Jane E. Hardisty,
State Conservationist, Indianapolis, Indiana.
[FR Doc. 04-2224 Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from financial statements for the three month period ended
March 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          34,598
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,598
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,225
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,598
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 3834.22 How will I know that BLM has adjusted location and maintenance fees?

BLM will publish a notice in the Federal Register about the adjustment on or before July 1st of a given year in order to make the adjusted fees due on September 1st of the same year.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 363

 354

 353

 350

 346

 347

 352

 350

 395

 413

 422

 401

 392

 387

 393

 398

 405

 416

 422

 433

 432

 434

 436

 435

 437

 423

 419

 420

 417

 408

 400

 341

 340

 339

 337

 333

 333

 333

 335

 340

 389

 394

 388

 375

 379

 383

 384

 393

 405

 411

 414

 419

 416

 410

 417

 410

 407

 408

 403

 391

 387

 384

 348

 348

 345

 342

 338

 340

 341

 342

 367

 402

 403

 394

 385

 383

 387

 390

 399

 410

 419

 422

 426

 425

 422

 425

 422

 415

 413

 411

 403

 396

 390

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
### **Subchapter D—Miscellaneous Penalty and Forfeiture Provisions**

Sec.
7341.
Penalty for sales to evade tax.
7342.
Penalty for refusal to permit entry or examination.
7343.
Definition of term "person".
7344.
Extended application of penalties relating to officers of the Treasury Department.
7345.
Revocation or denial of passport in case of certain tax delinquencies.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2015**—Pub. L. 114–94, div. C, title XXXII, §32101(h), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1733, added item 7345.