Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices 59685 

promulgate a proposed rule on the issue 

of whether the GHG Reporting Rule 

should be amended by the inclusion of 

proposed amendments of the same 

substance as set forth in Attachment A 

to the proposed settlement agreement. 

Under the proposed settlement 

agreement, Petitioners would dismiss 

their claims if EPA promulgates in final 

form an amendment to the GHG 

Reporting Rule that includes changes 

that are substantially the same 

substance as set forth in Attachment A 

to the proposed settlement agreement. 

The proposed settlement agreement 

further states that in the event not all 

such changes are made that are 

substantially the same substance as set 

forth in Attachment A to the proposed 

settlement agreement, the Petitioners 

would file a stipulation of dismissal for 

the issues that correspond to such 

changes that were made, and for those 

issues that were not resolved, with the 

creation of a new docket for those issues 

that were not resolved. 

Nothing in the proposed settlement 

agreement limits or modifies EPA’s 

discretion under the Clean Air Act in 

either the related notice and comment 

rulemaking process or otherwise. The 

EPA reserves the discretion to 

promulgate a final rule relating to any 

amendment to or revision of the GHG 

Reporting Rule and by this proposed 

settlement agreement has not obligated 

itself to issue any final rule which 

includes the proposed changes 

contained in Attachment A to the 

proposed settlement agreement. 

For a period of thirty (30) days 

following the date of publication of this 

notice, the Agency will accept written 

comments relating to the proposed 

settlement agreement from persons who 

were not named as parties or 

intervenors to the litigation in question. 

EPA or the Department of Justice may 

withdraw or withhold consent to the 

proposed settlement agreement if the 

comments disclose facts or 

considerations that indicate that such 

consent is inappropriate, improper, 

inadequate, or inconsistent with the 

requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or 

the Department of Justice determines 

that consent to this settlement 

agreement should be withdrawn, the 

terms of the agreement will be affirmed. 

II. Additional Information About 

Commenting on the Proposed 

Settlement Agreement 

A. How can I get a copy of the 

settlement agreement? 

The official public docket for this 

action (identified by Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OGC–2013–0181) contains a 

copy of the proposed settlement 

agreement. The official public docket is 

available for public viewing at the 

Office of Environmental Information 

(OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center, 

EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC. The EPA Docket Center Public 

Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The telephone 

number for the Public Reading Room is 

(202) 566–1744, and the telephone 

number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566– 

1752. 

An electronic version of the public 

docket is available through 

www.regulations.gov. You may use the 

www.regulations.gov to submit or view 

public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the official 

public docket, and to access those 

documents in the public docket that are 

available electronically. Once in the 

system, key in the appropriate docket 

identification number then select 

‘‘search’’. 

It is important to note that EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing online at www.regulations.gov 

without change, unless the comment 

contains copyrighted material, CBI, or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information 

claimed as CBI and other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute 

is not included in the official public 

docket or in the electronic public 

docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted 

material, including copyrighted material 

contained in a public comment, will not 

be placed in EPA’s electronic public 

docket but will be available only in 

printed, paper form in the official public 

docket. Although not all docket 

materials may be available 

electronically, you may still access any 

of the publicly available docket 

materials through the EPA Docket 

Center. 

B. How and to whom do I submit 

comments? 

You may submit comments as 

provided in the ADDRESSES section. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and an email 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD ROM you submit. This 

ensures that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment that 

is placed in the official public docket, 

and made available in EPA’s electronic 

public docket. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. 

Use of the www.regulations.gov Web 

site to submit comments to EPA 

electronically is EPA’s preferred method 

for receiving comments. The electronic 

public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, which means EPA will 

not know your identity, email address, 

or other contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

In contrast to EPA’s electronic public 

docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email) 

system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system. If you send an email comment 

directly to the Docket without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address is automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the official public 

docket, and made available in EPA’s 

electronic public docket. 

Dated: September 20, 2013. 

Lorie J. Schmidt, 

Associate General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2013–23690 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0152; FRL–9399–2] 

Registration Review; Draft Human 

Health and Ecological Risk 

Assessment; Notice of Availability 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

availability of EPA’s draft human health 

and ecological risk assessments for the 

registration review for 2-(decylthio) 

ethanamine hydrochloride (DTEA–HCl), 

flumetsulam, paclobutrazol, and 

trinexapac-ethyl, and opens a public 

comment period on these documents. 

Registration review is EPA’s periodic 

review of pesticide registrations to 

ensure that each pesticide continues to 

satisfy the statutory standard for 

registration, that is, the pesticide can 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
59686 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices 

perform its intended function without 

unreasonable adverse effects on human 

health or the environment. As part of 

the registration review process, the 

Agency has completed comprehensive 

draft risk assessments for each of the 

subject chemicals and is making them 

available for public comment. After 

reviewing comments received during 

the public comment period, EPA will 

issue revised risk assessments, if 

appropriate, explain any changes to the 

draft risk assessments, and respond to 

comments and may request public input 

on risk mitigation before completing a 

proposed registration review decision 

for each of the subject chemicals. 

Through this program, EPA is ensuring 

that each pesticide’s registration is 

based on current scientific and other 

knowledge, including its effects on 

human health and the environment. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before November 26, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number for the specific pesticide of 

interest provided in Table 1 in Unit 

III.A., by one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on commenting 

or visiting the docket, along with more 

information about dockets generally, is 

available at http://www.epa.gov/ 

dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

pesticide specific information contact: 

The Chemical Review Manager listed in 

Table 1 in Unit III.A. for the pesticide 

of interest. 

For general questions on the 

registration review program, contact: 

Jane Robbins, Pesticide Re-evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 308–0048; fax number: 

(703) 305–8005; email address: 

robbins.jane@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, farm 

worker, and agricultural advocates; the 

chemical industry; pesticide users; and 

members of the public interested in the 

sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. 

Since others also may be interested, the 

Agency has not attempted to describe all 

the specific entities that may be affected 

by this action. If you have any questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

to a particular entity, consult the 

Chemical Review Manager listed in 

Table 1 in Unit III.A. for the pesticide 

of interest. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI in a disk 

or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark 

the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as 

CBI and then identify electronically 

within the disk or CD–ROM the specific 

information that is claimed as CBI. In 

addition to one complete version of the 

comment that includes information 

claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment 

that does not contain the information 

claimed as CBI must be submitted for 

inclusion in the public docket. 

Information so marked will not be 

disclosed except in accordance with 

procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

i. Identify the document by docket ID 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

iv. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

v. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

vi. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

vii. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

viii. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to 

achieve environmental justice, the fair 

treatment and meaningful involvement 

of any group, including minority and/or 

low income populations, in the 

development, implementation, and 

enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies. To help 

address potential environmental justice 

issues, the Agency seeks information on 

any groups or segments of the 

population who, as a result of their 

location, cultural practices, or other 

factors, may have a typical or 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health impacts or environmental 

effects from exposure to the pesticides 

discussed in this document, compared 

to the general population. 

II. Authority 

EPA is conducting its registration 

review of the pesticides identified in 

this document pursuant to section 3(g) 

of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 

and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the 

Procedural Regulations for Registration 

Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C. 

Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among 

other things, that the registrations of 

pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 

years. Under FIFRA, a pesticide product 

may be registered or remain registered 

only if it meets the statutory standard 

for registration given in FIFRA section 

3(c)(5). When used in accordance with 

widespread and commonly recognized 

practice, the pesticide product must 

perform its intended function without 

unreasonable adverse effects on the 

environment; that is, without any 

unreasonable risk to man or the 

environment, or a human dietary risk 

from residues that result from the use of 

a pesticide in or on food. 

III. Registration Reviews 

A. What action is the agency taking? 

As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), 

EPA is reviewing the pesticide 

registrations for 2-(decylthio) 

ethanamine hydrochloride (DTEA–HCl), 

flumetsulam, paclobutrazol, and 

trinexapac-ethyl to ensure they continue 

to satisfy the FIFRA standard for 

registration—that is, that these 

pesticides can still be used without 

unreasonable adverse effects on human 

health or the environment. 

At this stage in the registration review 

process, consistent with the changes to 

the registration review process 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices 59687 

announced on March 27, 2013, jointly 

developed with the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture, the National Marine 

Fisheries Service, and the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (‘‘the Services’’) to 

enhance opportunities for stakeholder 

input during pesticide registration 

reviews and endangered species 

consultations, draft environmental risk 

assessments include an evaluation of 

the potential risks to federally listed 

endangered and threatened species 

(hereafter referred to as ‘‘listed 

species’’). EPA intends to complete 

refined assessments of potential risks to 

individual listed species, as needed. 

The refined listed species assessments 

will be based on the recommendations 

of the National Research Council (NRC), 

which has been tasked with providing 

advice on ecological risk assessment 

tools and scientific approaches in 

developing listed species risk 

assessments that are compliant with 

both FIFRA and the Endangered Species 

Act (ESA). The NRC report, issued April 

30, 2013, provides recommendations to 

ensure scientific soundness and 

maximize the utility of risk assessment 

refinements for listed species. 

Additional information can be found at 

the following Web site: http:// 

www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/ 

projectview.aspx?key=49396. 

Revisions to risk assessments will 

likely reflect Agency review of the 

report and any associated methodology 

and science policy based on the report’s 

recommendations. Refinements to the 

listed species assessments may include, 

but not be limited to, the following: 

• More detailed, species-specific 

ecological and biological data. 

• More detailed and accurate 

information on chemical use patterns. 

• Sub-county level spatial proximity 

data depicting the co-occurrence of 

potential effects areas and listed species 

and any designated critical habitat. 

In the event that a draft risk assessment 

shows risks of concern to human health 

or the environment for a specific 

chemical, EPA reserves the right to 

initiate mitigation at this stage of 

registration review. This effort to 

mitigate a chemical’s risks early in the 

registration review process is consistent 

with the Agency’s approach for 

registration review. Where risks are 

identified early in the registration 

review process and opportunities for 

early mitigation exist, the Agency may 

pursue those opportunities as they arise, 

rather then waiting for completion of a 

chemical’s registration review in order 

to mitigate risks. The public comment 

period for the draft risk assessments 

allows members of the public to provide 

comments and suggestions for revising 

the draft risk assessments and for 

reducing risks. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is 

providing an opportunity, through this 

notice of availability, for interested 

parties to provide comments and input 

concerning the Agency’s draft human 

health and ecological risk assessments 

for 2-(decylthio) ethanamine 

hydrochloride (DTEA–HCl), 

flumetsulam, paclobutrazol, and 

trinexapac-ethyl. Such comments and 

input could address, among other 

things, the Agency’s risk assessment 

methodologies and assumptions, as 

applied in these draft risk assessments. 

The Agency will consider all comments 

received during the public comment 

period and make changes, as 

appropriate, to the draft human health 

and ecological risk assessments. EPA 

will then issue revised risk assessments, 

if appropriate, explain any changes to 

the draft risk assessment, and respond 

to comments. In the Federal Register 

notice announcing the availability of the 

revised risk assessments, if the revised 

risk assessments indicate risks of 

concern, the Agency may provide a 

comment period for the public to submit 

suggestions for mitigating the risks 

identified in those revised risk 

assessments before developing proposed 

registration review decisions on 

flumetsulam, paclobutrazol, and 2- 

(decylthio) ethanamine hydrochloride 

(DTEA–HCI) trinexapac-ethyl. At 

present, EPA is releasing registration 

review draft risk assessments for the 

pesticide cases identified in the 

following table and further described in 

this unit. 

TABLE 1—REGISTRATION REVIEW DRAFT RISK ASSESSMENTS

Registration review case name and No. Pesticide docket 

identification (ID) No. 

Chemical review manager, telephone number, and 

email address 

2-(Decylthio) ethanamine hydrochloride (DTEA–HCl), 

Case No. 5029.

EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0336 Seiichi Murasaki, (703) 347–0163, murasaki. 

seiichi@epa.gov. 

Flumetsulam, Case No. 7229 ........................................... EPA–HQ–2008–0625 ......... Katherine St. Clair, (703) 347–8778, Katherine. 

StClair@epa.gov. 

Paclobutrazol, Case No. 7002 .......................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0109 Khue Nguyen, (703) 347–0248, Nguyen. 

khue@epa.gov. 

Trinexapac-ethyl, Case No. 7228 ..................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0657 Kaitlin Keller, (703) 308–8172, Keller.kaitlin@epa.gov. 

• 2-(decylthio) ethanamine 

hydrochloride (DTEA–HCl). The 

registration review docket for 2- 

(decylthio) ethanamine hydrochloride 

(DTEA–HCl) (EPA–HQ–OPP–2009– 

0336) opened in the Federal Register 

issue of June 24, 2009 (74 FR 30070) 

(FRL–8421–8). DTEA–HCl is registered 

for use in recirculating cooling water 

systems to control bacterial, fungal and 

algal slimes. Examples of DTEA–HCl 

use sites include evaporative condenser 

water systems, heat exchange water 

systems, commercial and industrial 

cooling towers, influent systems such as 

flow-through filters and lagoons, 

industrial scrubbing systems, and 

brewery pasteurizer water systems. The 

Agency has conducted a qualitative 

human health risk assessment for the 

dietary (food and drinking water) 

pathway. The residential and 

occupational exposure pathways were 

not assessed because these exposures 

are not expected to occur. The Agency 

has conducted a quantitative ecological 

risk assessment, which includes a 

screening-level listed species 

assessment. EPA acknowledges that 

further refinements to the listed species 

assessment will be completed in future 

revisions and requests public comment 

on specific areas that will reduce the 

uncertainties associated with the 

characterization of risk to listed species 

identified in the current assessment. 

• Flumetsulam. The registration 

review docket for flumetsulam (EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2008–0625) opened in the 

Federal Register issue of September 15, 

2008 (73 FR 53244) (FRL–8381–3). 

Flumetsulam is a sulfonanilide 

herbicide belonging to the 

triazolopyrimidine chemical class. 

Flumetsulam is marketed in water 

dispersible granule (WDG), emulsifiable 

concentrate (EC), and wettable powder 

(WP) products intended for use in 

agriculture to control broadleaf weeds in 

field corn and soybeans. There are no 

residential or public recreational uses of 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
59688 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2013 / Notices 

flumetsulam. The Agency has 

conducted a human health risk 

assessment for both dietary (food and 

drinking water) and occupational 

exposure pathways. The Agency also 

has conducted a quantitative ecological 

risk assessment, which includes a 

screening-level listed species 

assessment. EPA acknowledges that 

further refinements to the listed species 

assessment will be completed in future 

revisions and requests public comment 

on specific areas that will reduce the 

uncertainties associated with the 

characterization of risk to listed species 

identified in the current assessment. 

• Paclobutrazol. The registration 

review docket for paclobutrazol (EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2006–0109) opened in the 

Federal Register issue of March 28, 

2007 (72 FR 14548) (FRL–8118–3). 

Paclobutrazol is a plant growth regulator 

and is registered for use on a variety of 

ornamental flowers and trees, golf 

course turf, ornamental turf, outdoor 

residential areas, and rights-of-way. The 

Agency has conducted a human health 

risk assessment for dietary (drinking 

water only), residential, and 

occupational exposure pathways. The 

Agency has conducted a quantitative 

ecological risk assessment, which 

includes a screening-level listed species 

assessment. EPA acknowledges that 

further refinements to the listed species 

assessment will be completed in future 

revisions and requests public comment 

on specific areas that will reduce the 

uncertainties associated with the 

characterization of risk to listed species 

identified in the current assessment. 

• Trinexapac-ethyl. The registration 

review docket for trinexapac-ethyl 

(EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0657) opened in 

the Federal Register issue of September 

15, 2008 (73 FR 53244) (FRL–8381–3). 

Trinexapac-ethyl is a plant growth 

regulator and is registered for use by 

homeowners and professional 

applicators to manage growth of warm 

and cool season turfgrass on golf 

courses, sod farms, residential lawns, 

and other areas. It is also registered for 

use on cereals grains (barley, oats, 

triticale, and wheat), and grasses grown 

for seed (forage and hay) for yield 

protection and lodging prevention, and 

on sugarcane for internode shortening 

and harvest extension. The Agency has 

conducted a human health risk 

assessment for dietary (drinking water 

only), residential, and occupational 

exposure pathways. The Agency has 

conducted a quantitative ecological risk 

assessment, which includes a screeninglevel listed species assessment. 

EPA acknowledges that further 

refinements to the listed species 

assessment will be completed in future 

revisions and requests public comment 

on specific areas that will reduce the 

uncertainties associated with the 

characterization of risk to listed species 

identified in the current assessment. 

1. Other related information. 

Additional information for 2-(decylthio) 

ethanamine hydrochloride (DTEA–HCl), 

flumetsulam, paclobutrazol, and 

trinexapac-ethyl are available on the 

chemical pages for these pesticides in 

Chemical Search, http://www.epa.gov/ 

pesticides/chemicalsearch, and in each 

chemical’s individual docket listed in 

Table 1 in Unit III.A. Information on the 

Agency’s registration review program 

and its implementing regulation is 

available at http://www.epa.gov/ 

oppsrrd1/registration_review. 

2. Information submission 

requirements. Anyone may submit data 

or information in response to this 

document. To be considered during a 

pesticide’s registration review, the 

submitted data or information must 

meet the following requirements: 

i. To ensure that EPA will consider 

data or information submitted, 

interested persons must submit the data 

or information during the comment 

period. The Agency may, at its 

discretion, consider data or information 

submitted at a later date. 

ii. The data or information submitted 

must be presented in a legible and 

useable form. For example, an English 

translation must accompany any 

material that is not in English and a 

written transcript must accompany any 

information submitted as an 

audiographic or videographic record. 

Written material may be submitted in 

paper or electronic form. 

iii. Submitters must clearly identify 

the source of any submitted data or 

information. 

iv. Submitters may request the 

Agency to reconsider data or 

information that the Agency rejected in 

a previous review. However, submitters 

must explain why they believe the 

Agency should reconsider the data or 

information in the pesticide’s 

registration review. 

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the 

registration review docket for each 

pesticide case will remain publicly 

accessible through the duration of the 

registration review process; that is, until 

all actions required in the final decision 

on the registration review case have 

been completed. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, 2- 

(decylthio) ethanamine hydrochloride 

(DTEA–HCl), Flumetsulam, 

Paclobutrazol, Pesticides and pest, and 

Trinexapac-ethyl. 

Dated: September 19, 2013. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2013–23689 Filed 9–26–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE 

UNITED STATES 

[Public Notice: 2013–0049] 

Application for Final Commitment for a 

Long-Term Loan or Financial 

Guarantee in Excess of $100 Million: 

AP088292XX & AP088292XA 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the 

United States. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This Notice is to inform the 

public, in accordance with Section 

3(c)(10) of the Charter of the ExportImport Bank of the United States (‘‘ExIm Bank’’), that Ex-Im Bank has received 

an application for final commitment for 

a long-term loan or financial guarantee 

in excess of $100 million (as calculated 

in accordance with Section 3(c)(10) of 

the Charter). Comments received within 

the comment period specified below 

will be presented to the Ex-Im Bank 

Board of Directors prior to final action 

on this Transaction. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 22, 2013 to be assured 

of consideration before final 

consideration of the transaction by the 

Board of Directors of Ex-Im Bank. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted through Regulations.gov at 

WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV. To submit 

a comment, enter EIB–2013–0049 under 

the heading ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and 

select Search. Follow the instructions 

provided at the Submit a Comment 

screen. Please include your name, 

company name (if any) and EIB–2013– 

0049 on any attached document. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Reference: AP088292XX & 

AP088292XA. 

Purpose and Use 

Brief description of the purpose of the 

transaction: 

To support the export of U.S.- 

manufactured cargo aircraft to the 

Republic of Korea. 

Brief non-proprietary description of 

the anticipated use of the items being 

exported: 

To be used for the transportation of 

air cargo between the Republic of Korea 

and other countries. 

To the extent that Ex-Im Bank is 

reasonably aware, the item(s) being 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES