alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         134,082
<SECURITIES>                                    63,493
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,515
<INVENTORY>                                     54,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               320,527
<PP&E>                                          47,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 350,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,579
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,472
<OTHER-SE>                                     291,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   350,815
<SALES>                                        120,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,550
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,531
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,259
<DISCONTINUED>                                  45,376
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,635
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.57
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22225]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Geosciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public law 
92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Geosciences (1755).
    Dates/Times: October 27, 2004, 2-5:30 p.m., October 28, 2004 
8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m., October 29, 2004, 8:30 a.m.-2 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
1235, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Thomas Spence, Directorate for Geosciences, 
National Science Foundation, Suite 705, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, Virginia 22230, phone 703-292-8500.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations, and 
oversight concerning support for research, education, and human 
resources development in the geosciences.
    Agenda:

Day 1
    Directorate Activity Reports
    Meeting with NSF Deputy Director
Day 2
    Planning, Coordination, and Implementation Activities
    Division Subcommittee Meeting and Reports
Day 3
    Education and Diversity Subcommittee Meeting
    Committee of Visitors Reports
    Intersessional Activities

    Dated: September 29, 2004.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-22225 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Data used to estimate estimate flow
La Grange release: 5250 cfs
La Grange release: 5000 cfs
La Grange release: 4900 cfs
La Grange release: 4500 cfs
La Grange release: 4400 cfs
La Grange release: 3810 cfs
La Grange release: 3850 cfs
La Grange release: 3300 cfs
La Grange release: 3400 cfs
La Grange release: 2950 cfs
La Grange release: 2900 cfs
La Grange release: 2600 cfs
La Grange release: 2650 cfs
La Grange release: 2170 cfs
La Grange release: 2250 cfs
La Grange release: 1900 cfs
La Grange release: 1900 cfs
La Grange release: 4800 cfs
La Grange release: 5000 cfs
La Grange release: 5240 cfs
La Grange release: 5150 cfs
La Grange release: 5100 cfs
La Grange release: 5100 cfs
La Grange release: 5100 cfs
La Grange release: 5100 cfs
La Grange release: 5100 cfs
### From: Cassar, Christopher [ mailto:Christopher.Cassar@eia.gov]

**Sent:** Friday, June 12, 2015 9:01 AM **To:** Diem, Art **Subject:** RE: Question about percentage of respondents that only report gross generation and not net generation Art, In 2013, approximately 8% of power plants reporting on the EIA

- 923 survey form reported gross generation and not net generation. Regards, Chris **From:** Diem, Art [ mailto:Diem.Art@epa.gov] **Sent:** Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:04 PM **To:** EIA
- 923 **Subject:** Question about percentage of respondents that only report gross generation and not net generation 

### Hi, Please con tact me about the number of respondents that report only gross generation and not net generation? Thanks, Art

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Art Diem, Environmental Engineer USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Sector Polici es and Programs Division, Refining and Chemicals Group Diem.Art@epa.gov 919
- 541
- 1185
Exhibit
99.7






CONSENT
OF AJM PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
  
  To:  The
Board of Directors of Provident Energy Ltd.
      Reference:
              Renewal Annual Information Form
      and Form 40Fof Provident Energy Trust (the
      "Trust")
  Dear
Sirs:
  We refer
to the renewal annual information form of Provident Energy Trust (the "Trust")
dated March 16, 2009 (the "AIF") and the Form 40-F of the Trust.
   AJM
Petroleum Consultants ("AJM") was engaged to evaluate the oil and natural gas
reserves in respect of certain properties held by Provident Energy
Ltd.  We understand that the AIF and Form 40-F contain references to
the AJM Report March 2, 2009 effective December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), and to
our having evaluated the oil and natural gas reserves in respect of these
properties.  Summaries of and excerpts from the Report are included in
the Form 51-101F1.  The AIF and Form 40-F contain reference to the
Form 51-101F1 and to Form 51-101F2 of AJM dated March 2, 2009.
   We hereby
consent to the use of our name and reference to the said Report in the AIF and Form
40-F.
  
  Dated
this 12th day of March 2009.
  
  Yours
very truly,
 
  AJM
PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
  
  Original
Signed by “Barry R. Ashton”
   Barry R.
Ashton, P. Eng.
  Chief
Operating Officer
#### § 3503.15 May I lease the gold or silver reserved to the United States on land I hold under a private land claim in New Mexico?

If you hold the remaining record title interest or operating rights interest in confirmed private land grants in New Mexico, you may obtain a lease for gold and silver reserved to the United States. See parts 3580 and 3581 of this chapter for leasing requirements.
#### § 3802.1-3 Operations existing on October 21, 1976.

A plan of operations shall not be required for operations that were being conducted on October 21, 1976, unless the operation is undergoing changes that exceed the manner and degree of operations on October 21, 1976. However, if the authorized officer determines that operations in the same manner and degree are causing undue or unnecessary degradation of lands and resources or adverse environmental effects, an approved plan containing protective measures may be required. Any changes planned in an existing operation that would result in operations exceeding the present manner and degree shall be delayed until the plan is processed under provisions of § 3802.1-5 of this title.
§ 3473.4 Suspension of operations, production, and payment obligations. ( a ) Application by a lessee for relief from any operating and producing requirements of a lease; shall be filed in triplicate in the office of the Mining Supervisor in accordance with 43 CFR part 3480.
( b ) The term of any lease shall be extended by adding thereto any period of suspension of all operations and production during such term in accordance with any direction or assent of the Mining Supervisor.
[44 FR 42643, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33151, July 30, 1982]
Exhibit
31


CERTIFICATION


I,
Atsushi Maki, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Amanasu Environment
Corporation;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
have:


a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;


b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5. I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):


a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. I have
indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.





Date:
April 13, 2005





________________


Atsushi
Maki


President
and


Principal
Financial Officer
# Úradný vestník C 217A/1. j

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 217A |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 631. júla 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 217A

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 631. júla 2020

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | Korigendá |
| 2020/C 217 A/01 | Korigendum k výzve na vyjadrenie záujmu — Audítori/audítorky v odbore i) matematika a štatistika; ii) dátová veda, digitálny audit, analýza údajov a sietí, hĺbková analýza údajov a textu, automatizácia procesov a vyťažovanie procesov — Dočasní zamestnanci (platová trieda AD 5 – AD 9) ( Ú. v. EÚ C 185 A, 4.6.2020 ) | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

Korigendá

2020/C 217 A/01

Korigendum k výzve na vyjadrenie záujmu — Audítori/audítorky v odbore i) matematika a štatistika; ii) dátová veda, digitálny audit, analýza údajov a sietí, hĺbková analýza údajov a textu, automatizácia procesov a vyťažovanie procesov — Dočasní zamestnanci (platová trieda AD 5 – AD 9) ( Ú. v. EÚ C 185 A, 4.6.2020 )

( Ú. v. EÚ C 185 A, 4.6.2020 )

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

Korigendá

| 1.7.2020 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CA 217/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2020

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CA 217/1

---

Korigendum k výzve na vyjadrenie záujmu — Audítori/audítorky v odbore i) matematika a štatistika; ii) dátová veda, digitálny audit, analýza údajov a sietí, hĺbková analýza údajov a textu, automatizácia procesov a vyťažovanie procesov — Dočasní zamestnanci (platová trieda AD 5 – AD 9)

(
  Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 185 A zo 4. júna 2020
  )

(2020/C 217 A/01)

Na strane 4:

namiesto:

„Termín na podanie prihlášok je 2. júla 2020 na poludnie (SEČ).“

má byť:

má byť:

„Termín na podanie prihlášok je 15. septembra 2020 (SEČ).“.

---
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Date and Time: Friday, October 8, 2004, 9:30 a.m.

Place: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street, NW., Room 540, 
Washington, DC 20425.

Status: 

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes of September 17, 2004 Meeting
III. Announcements
IV. Staff Director's Report
V. State Advisory Committee Appointments for Montana, North Dakota, 
Ohio, Utah, and Washington
VI. ``Redefining Rights in America: The Civil Rights Record of the 
George W. Bush Administration, 2001-2004'' Report
VII. Future Agenda Items
11 a.m. Briefing on Voting and Election Reform: Is America Ready to 
Vote?

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Les Jin, Press and Communications 
(202) 376-7700.

Debra A. Carr,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 04-22301 Filed 9-29-04; 4:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
Sacramento

River

T15N R1W T15N R1E

T16N R1W T16N R1E

SSUUTTTTEE RR CC OO

CCOOLL UUSSAA CCOO

2 1 6

11 7 12

13 14 18

35 36 31

3

10

15

34

81.8 L

81.5 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-1949A-R-1

Exhibit B

Tarke, Stephen E. and Debra F.

725-202-129

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 22, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\tarke_stephen_e_and_debra_f\tarke_stephen_e_and_debra_f.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10041 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ROGER WAYNE LANGSTON, also known as Big Country , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CR

- 132

- 8

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Roger Wayne Langston appeals the 480

- month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to
distribute a controlled substance. He contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable.
We need not decide whether to apply plain error review because Langston’s arguments fail to show any abuse of discretion. See Gall v. United

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 13, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10041 Document: 00514234755 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/13/2017No. 17

- 10041

2 States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) ; United States v. Rodriguez , 523 F.3d 522, 525 (5th Cir. 2008)

. He asserts that his sentence was much higher than the average drug trafficking sentences, but he does not demonstrate that these average sentences involved similarly situated defendants. See United States v. Simpson , 796 F.3d 548, 559 (5th Cir. 2015). The district court was aware of the guidelines calculations, the applicable statutory ranges, and Langston’s mitigating arguments but decided to impose a sentence within the guidelines range. The district court cited the length and seriousness of Langston’s criminal history and emphasized his use of violence. “[T]he sentencing judge is in a superior position to find facts and judge their import under [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) with respect to a particular defendant.” United States v. Campos

Maldonado , 531 F.3d 337, 339 (5th Cir. 2008). Langston’s argume nt that the mitigating factors presented for the court’s consideration should have been balanced differently is “insufficient to disturb” the presumption of reasonableness that applies to his lengthy

- but

- within

- guidelines sentence. United States v. Alvarado , 691 F.3d 592, 597 (5th Cir. 2012); see Simpson , 796 F.3d at 559

- 60. Moreover, his challenge to the reasonableness of or deference owed to the drug quantity guideline is foreclosed. See id. at 560. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. Case: 17-10041 Document: 00514234755 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/13/2017
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPotential use of tiltrotor aircraft in Canadian aviationThe aviation system in Canada is described as it relates to the potential applicability of tiltrotor technology. Commuter service in two corridors, the Vancouver-Victoria route on the west coast and the heavily traveled Montreal-Toronto corridor in eastern Canada, are examined. The operation of air service from the near-downtown Toronto STOLport and from the Vancouver-Victoria downtown heliport facilities is described. The emergency medical services, search and rescue, and natural resources development sectors are described with regard to the needs that tiltrotor technology could uniquely meet in these areas. The airport construction program in isolated communities of northern Quebec and possible tiltrotor service in northern regions are reviewed. The Federal and provincial governments' financial support policy regarding the aeronautical industry is to encourage the establishment and expansion of businesses in the field of aeronautics and to make possible the acquisition of new technology. This policy has implications for the tiltrotor program.Document ID19910006688Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGazdag, Denyse*(Versatec, Inc., Santa Clara CA., United States)*Alton, Larry*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102245NAS 1.15:102245A-89269Accession Number91N16001Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-69-51Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006688.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §696. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 733, §6, 68 Stat. 725, which related to transfer of individual property by the Secretary of the Interior to members of each tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### Subpart D—Beer

Sec.
5051.
Imposition and rate of tax.
5052.
Definitions.
5053.
Exemptions.
5054.
Determination and collection of tax on beer.
5055.
Drawback of tax.
5056.
Refund and credit of tax, or relief from liability.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subpart D, comprising sections 5051 to 5057 of this title, related to beer, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
C HR ISTINE JANE ORTEGA,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt,
v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Ac ting C om m issione r of Soc i a l Se c urity , De fe nda nt-Appe l le e . No. 19-35028 D.C . No. 3:17-c v-01988-B R
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ore gon Anna J. B rown, Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 7, 2021 ** B e fore : THOM AS, C hie f Judge , a nd HAW K INS and M c KEOW N, C irc u it Judge s. C hristineOrte g a

a ppe a ls the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a ffirm ing the C om m issione r of Soc ia l Se c urity ’ s de nia l of he r a pplic ation for disa

bility insura nc e be ne fits a

nd supple m e nta l se c urity

inc o m e unde r Title s II and XVI of the



# FIL ED
SEP 9 2021 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Soc ia l Se c urity Ac t. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt de novo. Ford v . Saul , 950 F.3d 1141, 1153-54 (9th C ir. 2020). W e a ffirm
. Orte ga ’ s te stim ony

re ga rding theam o unts of sitting, sta nding, a nd wa lking
re quire d in he r pa st re le va nt work a s a

de live ry drive r provide d substa

ntia l
e vide nc e in support of the a dm inistra

t ive la wjudge ’ s (“ ALJ” ) finding tha t the work wa s se de nta

ry a s a c tua lly

pe rform e d. Se e 20 C .F.R . §§ 404.1567(a ), 416.967(a) (de fining se de nt ary work). Se e also C

o le man v . Saul , 979 F.3d 751, 755 (9th C i r. 2020) (de fining substa ntia l e vide nc e ). Ac c ordingly , substa ntia l
e vide nc e supports the

ALJ’ s finding, a

t Ste p Four of the se que ntia l a na ly sis, tha

t Orte ga c o uld pe rform

he r pa st re le va

nt work a s a c tua lly

pe rform e d, a

nd she the re fore wa s not disa

ble d. Se e 20 C .F.R . §§ 404.1520(a )(4)(iv), 416.920(a)(4)(iv). Se e also Ford , 950 F.3d a

t 1149. AFFIRM E D.

2
### Subpart B—Effects on Corporation

Sec.
311.
Taxability of corporation on distribution.
312.
Effect on earnings and profits.
#### Sam Feuer, Appellant, v. Marguerite Walworth, Respondent.

Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
### §677q. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1009, §18, 68 Stat. 877, which related to applicability of decedents' estates laws to individual trust property of mixed-blood members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Sacramento

River

T9N R4E

0

21

16

28

17

20

YYOOLLOO CC OO

SSAACC RRAA MM EENN TTOO CC OO

Tule Canal

5.25 R

Contract No. 14-06-200-934A-R-1

Exhibit B

Riverby Limited

725-202-117

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 18, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\riverby_limited\riverby_limited.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
### PART II—JEOPARDY ASSESSMENTS

Sec.
6861.
Jeopardy assessments of income, estate, gift, and certain excise taxes.
6862.
Jeopardy assessment of taxes other than income, estate, gift, and certain excise taxes.
6863.
Stay of collection of jeopardy assessments.
6864.
Termination of extended period for payment in case of carryback.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1974**—Pub. L. 93–406, title II, §1016(b)(5), Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 932, substituted "gift, and certain excise taxes" for "and gift taxes" in items 6861 and 6862.