alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 398

 338

 351

 335

 354

 357

 351

 353

 351

 352

 340

 335

 344

 351

 352

 355

 401

 447

 472

 497

 502

 492

 455

 454

 448

 427

 457

 479

 507

 511

 517

 314

 314

 316

 317

 322

 335

 332

 330

 317

 317

 311

 313

 317

 305

 315

 310

 359

 392

 426

 458

 443

 429

 419

 403

 387

 382

 397

 404

 461

 465

 472

 325

 322

 323

 325

 334

 345

 343

 341

 333

 330

 327

 324

 330

 331

 331

 323

 380

 414

 450

 482

 475

 459

 443

 429

 417

 410

 420

 441

 488

 493

 505

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [OR-030-1020-XX-028H; HAG 04-0291] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Vale District. 

# ACTION:

Conference call for the John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council. 

# SUMMARY:

The John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council will have a conference call on November 8, 2004 at 7 p.m. Pacific Time. 

The conference call participants will discuss the Draft Forest Service Vegetation Treatment Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 

The entire conference call is open to the public. To participate in the conference call, please submit a written request to the Vale District Office 10 days prior to the call. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Peggy Diegan, Management Assistant/Webmaster, Vale District Office, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, OR 97918 (541) 473-3144, or e-mail                         *Peggy_Diegan@or.blm.gov.*

Dated: September 29, 2004. 

Tom Dabbs, 

Acting District Manager. 

[FR Doc. 04-22352 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
### Subpart B—Effects on Corporation

Sec.
336.
Gain or loss recognized on property distributed in complete liquidation.
337.
Nonrecognition for property distributed to parent in complete liquidation of subsidiary.
338.
Certain stock purchases treated as asset acquisitions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title VI, §631(e)(17), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2275, substituted "Gain or loss recognized on property distributed in complete liquidation" for "General rule" in item 336 and "Nonrecognition for property distributed to parent in complete liquidation of subsidiary" for "Gain or loss on sales or exchanges in connection with certain liquidations" in item 337.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–248, title II, §224(c)(9), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 489, substituted "Certain stock purchases treated as asset acquisitions" for "Effect on earnings and profits" in item 338.
§ 3432.0-3 Authority. ( a ) The regulations of this subpart are issued under the authority of the statutes cited in § 3400.0-3 of this title.
( b ) These regulations primarily implement section 3 of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended by section 13 of the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act of 1976 (30 U.S.C. 203).
James Stafford

James Stafford

Chartered Accountants

Suite 300  555 West Georgia Street

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada V6B 1Z6

Telephone +1 (604) 669 0711

Facsimile +1 (604) 669 0754









U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission





12 May 2005



Subject:

Alberta Star Development Corp.







Dear Sirs:



We consent to use of our report dated 2 February 2005, with respect to the financial statements of Alberta Star Development Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 November 2004, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



Yours truly,



James Stafford



James Stafford, Chartered Accountants



Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada

12 May 2005
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION OF
CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Bucyrus
International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Timothy W. Sullivan, as President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Craig R. Mackus, Chief Financial Officer,
Controller and Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: (1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  /s/ T. W. SullivanTimothy W. SullivanPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 11, 2005  /s/ C. R. MackusCraig R. MackusChief Financial Officer, Controller and SecretaryNovember 11, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 20, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00688

- CV

Rodgy Lee Nesby, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUS TICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

The Court being of the opinion that it is without jurisdiction of the cause and that the appeal

should therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction: Therefor e, the Court dismisses the appeal

for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication

of costs is made.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-80709-RAR

LEE MITCHELL JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPUTY WILLIAMS, et al.,

Defendant.

____________________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s Report 

and Recommendation [ECF No. 13] (“Report”), filed on August 26, 2020. The Report 

recommends the two excessive force claims should PROCEED against Deputy Williams and the 

failure to intervene claim should also PROCEED against Deputy Tyson. See Report at 7. The 

time for objections has passed, and there are no objections to the Report. 

When a magistrate judge’s “disposition” has properly been objected to, district courts must 

review the disposition de novo. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). However, when no party has timely 

objected, “the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in 

order to accept the recommendation.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72 advisory committee’s notes (citation 

omitted). Although Rule 72 itself is silent on the standard of review, the Supreme Court has 

acknowledged Congress’s intent was to only require a de novo review where objections have been 

properly filed, not when neither party objects. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It 

does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate [judge]’s 

factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to 

those findings.”). In any event, the “[f]ailure to object to the magistrate [judge]’s factual findings 

Case 9:20-cv-80709-RAR Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2020 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

after notice precludes a later attack on these findings.” Lewis v. Smith, 855 F.2d 736, 738 (11th 

Cir. 1988) (citing Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 (5th Cir. 1982)). 

Because there are no objections to the Report, the Court did not conduct a de novo review. 

Rather, the Court reviewed the Report for clear error. Finding none, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [ECF No. 13] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. The two excessive force claims will PROCEED against Deputy Williams and the 

failure to intervene claim should also PROCEED against Deputy Tyson.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 16th day of November, 2020.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Counsel of record

Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid

Case 9:20-cv-80709-RAR Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2020 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of reporting requirements submitted for OMB review. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         notifying the public that the agency has made such a submission.                     

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before November 3, 2004. If you intend to comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline. 

*Copies:*                         Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the Agency Clearance Officer.                     

# ADDRESSES:

                        Address all comments concerning this notice to:                         *Agency Clearance Officer,*                         Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and                         *David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov,*                         fax number 202-395-7285 Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 205-7044. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:*                     Notice of Award and Grant/Cooperative Agreement Cost Sharing Proposal.                 

*Form No's:*                     1222 and 1224.                 

*Frequency:*                     On Occasion.                 

*Description of Respondents:*                     Participating Colleges.                 

*Responses:*                     2,256.                 

*Annual Burden:*                     202,080.                 

Jacqueline K. White, 

Chief, Administrative Information Branch. 

[FR Doc. 04-22200 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Qualitative Piloted Evaluation of the Tupolev Tu-144 Supersonic TransportTwo U.S. research pilots evaluated the Tupolev Tu-144 supersonic transport aircraft on three dedicated flights: one subsonic and two supersonic profiles. The flight profiles and maneuvers were developed jointly by Tupolev and U.S. engineers. The vehicle was found to have unique operational and flight characteristics that serve as lessons for designers of future supersonic transport aircraft. Vehicle subsystems and observed characteristics are described as are flight test planning and ground monitoring facilities. Maneuver descriptions and extended pilot narratives for each flight are included as appendices.Document ID20000025077Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRivers, Robert A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Jackson, E. Bruce*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Fullerton, C. Gordon*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Cox, Timothy H.*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Princen, Norman H.*(Boeing Co. Long Beach, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 2000Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberL-17945NAS 1.15:209850NASA/TM-2000-209850Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 537-08-23Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000025077.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Renovo Holdings (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen W. Carnes, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/Stephen W. Carnes 

| Stephen W. Carnes |  
President and Chief Accounting Officer

September 1, 2005

 
 

 

 

 

  |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 3601.3 Authority. ( a ) BLM's authority to dispose of sand, gravel, and other mineral and vegetative materials that are not subject to mineral leasing or location under the mining laws is the Act of July 31, 1947, as amended (30 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*), commonly referred to as the Materials Act. This authority applies to sale and free use of these materials. BLM's authority to allow removal of limited quantities of petrified wood from public lands without charge is section 2 of the Act of September 28, 1962 (Pub. L. 87-713, 76 Stat. 652).
( b ) Section 302 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA) (43 U.S.C. 1732) provides the general authority for BLM to manage the use, occupancy, and development of the public lands under the principles of multiple use and sustained yield in accordance with the land use plans that BLM develops under FLPMA.
( c ) Section 304 of FLPMA (43 U.S.C. 1734) and the Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1952 (31 U.S.C. 9701) authorize the U.S. Government to collect fees and to require reimbursement of its costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FO R TH E SO U TH ER N D IST RIC T O F FLO R ID A

BRANDON THOM PSON CASE NO: 20-cv-60885-R1G

Plaintiff,

VS.

FORT LAUDERDALE LAW GROUP SOUTH,PLLC

A Florida lim ited liability company

Defendantts).

/

FILED BY D.C.

JUN 2 3 2222

ANGELA q. NOBLE

CLERK U S. DIS'L CI

s. o. o.F Ftk. - 1rc oun.

DEFENDANT FO RT LAUDERDALE LAW GR OUP SOU TH PLLC'S M OTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COV LAINT

Defendant, FORT LAUDERDALE LAW GROUP SOUTH, PLLC, a Florida limited liability

company, hereby files this M otion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint, and in

support thereof states as follows:

1. Plaintiff, BRANDON THOM PSON (''plaintiff'), filed the original Complaint in this Court on

or about M ay 1, 2020.

2. Defendant, FORT LAUDERDALE LAW GROUP SOUTH, PLLC, a Florida lim ited liability

company t''Defendant''l, was served on M ay 13, 2020.

3. Due to the ongoing business and legal delays and dism ptions caused by the COVID-19

pandem ic, Defendant needs approxim ately thirty days up through and including July 3, 2020, to

retain counsel to defend Defendant and to respond to the Complaint.

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 1 of 3
4. This request for extension is reasonable under the circllm stances, is not sought for the purpose

of delay, and will not prejudice any party.

W HEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court grant the relief sought in

this m otion and enter an Order granting an extension of tim e for Defendant to respond to the

Complaint up tllrough and including July 3, 2020.

Dated: June 3, 2020

C. Patterson, M anager

Fo14 Lauderdale Law Group South, PLLC

6570 Griffin Road, Suite 105

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314

Phone: (954) 306-8620

Email: chrispat'terson@laawFlvlwG.com

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 2 of 3
C ER T IFIC A T E O F SE R V IC E

I hereby certify that on Jtme 3, 2020, a copy of the foregoing motion was served on N oah

E. Storch, Esq., of Richard Celler Legal, P.A ., 10368 W . SR 84, Suite 103, Davie, FL 33324, via

email at noah@foridaovel4inAelaN er.com as counsel for Plaintiff

ok

C. Patterson, M anager

Fort Lauderdale Law Group South, PLLC

6570 Griffin Road, Suite 105

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314

Phone: (954) 306-8620

Email: cluislnattersonrtklwawF'Lt,G.com

2

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2020 Page 3 of 3
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraLink Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nancy
K. Hamilton, Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, amended; and                                                                
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

|                                                                                                              | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ NANCY K. HAMILTONVice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
August 11, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SpectraLink Corporation and will be retained by SpectraLink
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### § 3436.0-5 Definitions.

As used in this subpart, the term *substantial financial and legal commitments* is a relative one, and the determination whether such commitments have been made, so as to qualify a person for an exchange under this subpart, will be made on a case-by-case basis. In making this determination, the Secretary will consider the level of expenditures made prior to January 1, 1977, that are related to development of the coal resource which is offered in exchange, taken together with the damages for which the person would be liable as a result of any legal commitments made prior to January 1, 1977, in connection with development of said coal resource, and the Secretary will compare that level of expenditure to the estimated total cost of developing the coal resource to the point of establishing a producing surface coal mining operation.
#### § 3830.20 Payment of service charges, location fees, initial maintenance fees, annual maintenance fees and oil shale fees.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 636

 662

 686

 629

 607

 631

 642

 649

 646

 618

 715

 716

 732

 750

 777

 790

 785

 729

 755

 777

 798

 795

 858

 827

 772

 734

 740

 736

 693

 663

 593

 602

 602

 588

 564

 529

 587

 598

 592

 547

 572

 696

 698

 730

 753

 764

 712

 691

 695

 734

 767

 759

 763

 775

 683

 703

 729

 683

 665

 607

 618

 639

 635

 614

 598

 609

 624

 627

 620

 583

 659

 709

 714

 738

 766

 778

 756

 704

 728

 764

 792

 779

 842

 798

 709

 726

 734

 708

 679

 633

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 10, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER