alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                    Midwest Medical Insurance Holding Company


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Medical Insurance
         Holding Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
         30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
         date hereof (the "Report"), I, Niles Cole, Vice President and Chief
         Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350,
         as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of June 30, 2002 (the last date
                  of the period covered by the Report).


         /s/ Niles Cole
         --------------------------------------------

         Niles Cole
         Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
         August 12, 2002
#### § 3452.2 Cancellation.
### §1300k–7. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–324, §9, as added Pub. L. 103–435, §21, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4574; amended Pub. L. 104–109, §2(b), Feb. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 763, which required submission of a list of members of the respective bands as of Sept. 21, 1994, to the Secretary of the Interior not later than 120 days after such date, and submission of a membership roll to the Secretary by each of the bands not later than 18 months after such date, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136705 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136705 

 COA: 275086 

Wayne CC: 05-010478-01

LYNN NEIL JACKSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7910** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. RONALD EUSTACH, a/k/a Tony Stracan , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. ( 4:00

- cr - 00067

- CMC

- 2 )

Submitted : April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD , and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Ronald Eustach, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina; Nancy Chastain Wicker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Eustach appeals from the district court’s order s denying his motions for reconsideration of his criminal judgment filed under Fe d. R. Civ. P. 59(e), 60(b) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eustach , No. 4:00

- cr - 00067

- CMC

- 2 (D.S.C. Sept. 18 & Oct. 4, 2013) . We dispense w ith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
Add at the end of Article 8(a):

The Contracting Officer shall adjust the amount of Project Water for which payment is required to the extent of any reduction in diversions of Project Water made in accordance with the water conservation provisions of Article 29(e).  

Add to Article 29:

(e)In order to provide incentives for water conservation, the Contracting Officer may reduce the amount of Project Water for which payment by the Contractor is required under Article 8(a) in accordance with the provisions of this Article 29(e).

1. On or before February 15 of any Water Year, the Contractor may file with Reclamation an Offer to Reduce Project Water Use, hereinafter referred to as  Offer. The Offer shall specify the maximum quantity of Project Water to be diverted by the Contractor for each month that Project Water is available for that Water Year under this Settlement Contract.  The Contracting Officer shall provide the Contractor with a decision, in writing, to the Offer on or before March 15 of that Water Year.  The dates specified in this Article 29 (e)(1) can be changed if mutually agreed to, in writing, by the Contractor and Contracting Officer. 

2. If Reclamation accepts the Offer, the Contractor’s payment obligation under Article 8(a)(1) shall be reduced to the maximum quantity of Project Water to be diverted by the Contractor as specified in the Offer.  The Contractor shall not divert Project Water in excess of the monthly quantities set forth in the Offer:  Provided, however, if the Contractor’s diversions of Project Water exceed the monthly quantities set forth in the Offer, the Contractor shall pay to Reclamation  the applicable Rates and Charges plus a penalty assessment equal to the applicable Rates and Charges, unadjusted for ability to pay, for each acre-foot of Project Water diverted in excess of the quantities set forth in the Offer. 

3. If Reclamation decides not to accept the Offer, the Contractor’s payment obligation will remain as specified in Article 8(a)(1).

PAGE
#### § 3832.90 Defects in the location of mining claims and sites.
§ 35.31 Determining the amount of penalties and assessments. ( a ) In determining an appropriate amount of civil penalties and assessments, the ALJ and the Director, upon appeal, should evaluate any circumstances that mitigate or aggravate the violation and should articulate in their opinions the reasons that support the penalties and assessments they impose. Because of the intangible costs of fraud, the expense of investigating such conduct, and the need to deter others who might be similarly tempted, ordinarily double damages and a significant civil penalty should be imposed.
( b ) Although not exhaustive, the following factors are among those that may influence the ALJ and the Director in determining the amount of penalties and assessments to impose with respect to the misconduct (i.e., the false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements) charged in the complaint: ( 1 ) The number of false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements;
( 2 ) The time period over which such claims or statements were made;
( 3 ) The degree of the defendant's culpability with respect to the misconduct;
( 4 ) The amount of money or the value of the property, services, or benefit falsely claimed;
( 5 ) The value of the Government's actual loss as a result of the misconduct, including foreseeable consequential damages and the costs of investigation.
( 6 ) The relationship of the amount imposed as civil penalties to the amount of the Government's loss;
( 7 ) The potential or actual impact of the misconduct upon national defense, public health or safety, or public confidence in the management of Government programs and operations, including particularly the impact on the intended beneficiaries of such programs;
( 8 ) Whether the defendant has engaged in a pattern of the same or similar misconduct;
( 9 ) Whether the defendant attempted to conceal the misconduct;
( 10 ) The degree to which the defendant has involved others in the misconduct or in concealing it;
( 11 ) Where the misconduct of employees or agents is imputed to the defendant, the extent to which the defendant's practices fostered or attempted to preclude such misconduct;
( 12 ) Whether the defendant cooperated in or obstructed an investigation of the misconduct;
( 13 ) Whether the defendant assisted in identifying and prosecuting other wrongdoers;
( 14 ) The complexity of the program or transaction, and the degree of the defendant's sophistication with respect to it, including the extent of the defendant's prior participation in the program or in similar transactions;
( 15 ) Whether the defendant has been found, in any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding to have engaged in similar misconduct or to have dealt dishonestly with the government of the United States or of a State, directly or indirectly; and
( 16 ) The need to deter the defendant and others from engaging in the same or similar misconduct.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ALJ or the Director from considering any other factors that in any given case may mitigate or aggravate the offense for which penalties and assessments are imposed.
EXHIBIT 

“4” 

 

Case 1:20-cv-21865-FAM Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-21865-FAM Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 3601.62 Cancellation procedure. ( a ) BLM will give you written notice of any defaults, breach, or cause of forfeiture, either in person or by certified mail. You have 30 days after receiving the notice: ( 1 ) To correct all defaults;
( 2 ) To request an extension of time in which to correct the defaults; or
( 3 ) To submit evidence showing to BLM's satisfaction why we should not cancel your contract or free use permit.
( b ) If you fail to respond to the notice under paragraph (a) of this section, or if delivery of the notice is refused, or not completed as described in § 1810.2 of this chapter, BLM may cancel the contract or permit.
#### § 3809.3 What rules must I follow if State law conflicts with this subpart?

If State laws or regulations conflict with this subpart regarding operations on public lands, you must follow the requirements of this subpart. However, there is no conflict if the State law or regulation requires a higher standard of protection for public lands than this subpart.
§ 3604.22 What conditions and restrictions pertain to my free use permit? ( a ) You must not barter or sell mineral materials that you obtain under a free use permit.
( b ) You must not remove mineral materials before BLM issues you a permit or after your permit expires.
( c ) BLM may incorporate other conditions and restrictions into your free use permit.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE
                         CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
                FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       I am the Vice President, Finance of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in
connection with the Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-KSB").

       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 29, 2005
                                              /s/ Bernard Denoyer
                                            -------------------------
                                            Bernard Denoyer
                                            Vice President, Finance
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-80709-RAR

LEE MITCHELL JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPUTY WILLIAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

 

ORDER TO U.S. MARSHAL DIRECTING

PERSONAL SERVICE UPON DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff in the above-captioned civil action is proceeding in forma pauperis, and Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e) provides that service be effected as follows:

(e) SERVICE UPON INDIVIDUALS WITHIN A JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE 

UNITED STATES. Unless otherwise provided by federal law, service upon an individual 

from whom a waiver has not been obtained and filed, other than an infant or an incompetent 

person, may be effected in any judicial district of the United States by:

(1) pursuant to the law of the state in which the district court is located, or

in which service is effected, for the service of a summons upon the 

defendant in an action brought in the courts of general jurisdiction of the 

State; or

(2) by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the 

individual personally or by leaving copies thereof at the individual's 

dwelling house or usual place of abode with some person of suitable age 

and discretion then residing therein or by delivering a copy of the summons 

and of the complaint to an agent authorized by appointment or by law to 

receive service of process.

Case 9:20-cv-80709-RAR Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2020 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Plaintiff has been permitted to proceed in forma pauperis and is therefore entitled to service 

of process at public expense. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the United 

States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Final Amended Complaint [ECF No. 10], Screening 

Report and Recommendations [ECF No. 13], Order Adopting the Report and Recommendations 

[ECF No. 20], and appropriate summons upon the following Defendant:

Deputy P. Tyson, 

Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office

3228 Gun Club Road

West Palm Beach, FL 33406

IN THE EVENT THAT PERSONAL SERVICE CANNOT BE EFFECTED UPON 

AN INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT, THE MARSHAL MAY SUBSTITUTE SERVICE, IF 

NECESSARY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND/OR STATE 

LAW. WHEN DOING SO, THE MARSHAL SHALL MAKE CLEAR AND SPECIFIC 

NOTATIONS ON THE APROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN,@ WHICH RECORD THE 

ACCEPTING OFFICER=S FULL NAME, TITLE, AND BADGE NUMBER, IN ADDITION 

TO THE MARSHAL=S REMARKS EXPLAINING THE REASON THAT THE NAMED 

INDIVIDUAL COULD NOT PERSONALLY BE SERVED.

 DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 25th day of November, 2020.

 

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Lee Mitchell Johnson

0384240

Palm Beach County DC

P.O. Box 1450

Belle Glade, FL 33430

PRO SE

Case 9:20-cv-80709-RAR Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2020 Page 2 of 2
### **Subchapter B—Tax on Certain Chemicals**

Sec.
4661.
Imposition of tax.
4662.
Definitions and special rules.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 499.39

 499.93

 499.44

 500.21

 499.73

 499.15

 498.77

 499.20

 499.70

 499.18

 499.71

 499.30

 498.99

 498.52

 499.41

 500.61

 500.35

 500.00

 500.36

 500.02

 500.88

 500.56

 500.21

 500.98

 500.63

 500.26

 499.93

 499.56

 499.16

 500.04

 500.62

 54,652

 55,228

 54,705

 55,531

 55,015

 54,396

 53,994

 54,449

 54,983

 54,428

 54,994

 54,556

 54,225

 53,732

 54,673

 55,964

 55,682

 55,303

 55,693

 55,325

 56,257

 55,910

 55,531

 56,365

 55,986

 55,585

 55,228

 54,834

 54,407

 55,346

 55,975

STORAGE

-566

+576

-523

+826

-516

-619

-402

+455

+534

-555

+566

-438

-331

-493

+941

+1,291

-282

-379

+390

-368

+932

-347

-379

+834

-379

-401

-357

-394

-427

+939

+629

CHANGE

-6

571

11

688

26

-18

76

504

549

1

564

58

111

40

752

921

71

4

390

6

661

25

9

625

11

-2

21

18

6

684

522

INFLOW

 277

 278

 272

 269

 283

 293

 278

 274

 280

 279

 277

 277

 275

 280

 277

 269

 212

 194

 192

 191

 190

 199

 199

 204

 201

 200

 201

 215

 219

 210

 204

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 1

 1

 1

 0

 2

 2

 2

 3

 9

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 2

 2

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2009 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/01/2010

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +757 7,899 7,469 0 0 52

ACRE-FEET +757 15,668 14,815 0 0 103

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 14,815

SPILL 0 14,815

 55,218

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 7

 555

 6

 692

 7

 5

 19

 503

 530

 14

 487

 14

 14

 14

 708

 928

 19

 14

 371

 14

 633

 8

 8

 613

 8

 6

 7

 16

 6

 669

 514

 7,409

 14,696

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
#### § 3602.40 Competitive sales.

In addition to the following sections, §§ 3602.41 through 3602.49, the provisions of §§ 3602.11 through 3602.29 also apply to competitive sales.
§ 4.1284 Answer. ( a ) Any party served with a notice of appeal who wishes to participate in the proceedings on appeal shall file an answer with the Board within 20 days after service of the notice of appeal or statement of reasons where such statement was not included in the notice of appeal.
( b ) If additional reasons, written arguments or other documents are filed by the appellant, a party shall have 20 days after service thereof within which to answer. The answer shall state the reasons the party opposes or supports the appeal.
**Exhibit 3.6**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**COLONY RIH HOLDINGS, INC.**

 

**Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law**

 

**THE UNDERSIGNED**, being the duly appointed Vice President of Colony RIH Holdings, Inc. (the“Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL.”), for the purpose of amending the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation(the “Certificate of Incorporation”) filed pursuant to Section 102 of the DGCL, hereby certifies, pursuant to Sections 242 and 103 of the DGCL, as follows: 

 

**FIRST**: That the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed on April 2, 2001 with theSecretary of State of the State of Delaware. 

 

**SECOND**: The amendment effected hereby was duly authorized by a majority of the stockholders entitled to vote thereon in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL and shall be executed, acknowledged and filed inaccordance with Section 103 of the DGCL. 

 

**THIRD:** That the Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended by deleting Section 4.1 of Article IV thereof in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 

 

“Section 4.1. Authorized Shares.The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is (a) 1,700,000 shares of Common Stock, consisting of 900,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Class A Common Stock”),and 800,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Class B Common Stock” and, together with the Class A Common Stock, the “Common Stock”), and (b) 50,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share(the “Preferred Stock”).” 

 

**INWITNESS WHEREOF**, I have made and signed this Certificate of Amendment this 20th day of March, 2002 and affirmthe statements contained herein as true under penalties of perjury.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4819 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4819

To establish a minimum temperature for thermostats at the headquarters 
 of the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2022

   Ms. Ernst introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish a minimum temperature for thermostats at the headquarters 
 of the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lead by Example Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. THERMOSTATS AT DOE AND EPA HEADQUARTERS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Energy and the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency shall set all thermostats in the 1 
or more buildings comprising the headquarters of the Department of 
Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency, respectively, to not 
lower than 78 degrees Fahrenheit when the air conditioning system is in 
operation.
    (b) Reports.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency shall each submit to Congress a report 
describing the temperature at which thermostats have been set in the 1 
or more buildings comprising the headquarters of the Department of 
Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency, respectively, during 
the period beginning on January 20, 2021, and ending on the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```