alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
San Mateo, CA
                                                               May 31, 2000
                                                               $150,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal  sum of one  hundred  and  fifty  thousand  dollars  ($150,000),  with
interest  from the date hereof at a rate of ten percent  (10%) per annum,  which
amount shall be secured by all of the assets of Borrower.  Said principal  shall
be due and  payable on demand by Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,
but in no event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred  eighty (180)
days after the date of this Note.  This Note may be prepaid at any time  without
penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         2. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         3.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 31 day of May, 2000.

                                          Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                          By: __________________

                                          Title: ________________
```

[108th Congress Public Law 444]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ444.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 2635]]

Public Law 108-444
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting Act of 1999 to modify 
  the termination date for mandatory price reporting. <<NOTE: Dec. 3, 
                          2004 -  [S. 2965]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    Section 942 of the Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting Act of 1999 
(7 U.S.C. 1635 note; Public Law 106-78) is amended by striking 
``terminate'' and all that follows and inserting ``terminate on 
September 30, 2005.''.

    Approved December 3, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2965:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Oct. 8, considered and passed Senate.
            Nov. 17, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Attachment 002 Structure and Reaction Sequence

Material redacted

--- Confidential Business Information
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Miguel C., Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Beth Beller, J.), rendered December 7, 2017, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of sexual misconduct, and sentencing him to six years' probation.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Beth Beller, J.), rendered December 7, 2017, affirmed. </p><p>Defendant seeks an "interest of justice" reduction in the probationary period imposed in accordance with his plea agreement. "Ordinarily... where defendant effects a plea bargain and receives the precise sentence that was promised, he should not later be heard to complain that he received what he bargained for" (<i>People v Fair</i>, 33 AD3d 558 [2006], <i>lv denied</i> 8 NY3d 945 [2007], quoting <i>People v Chambers</i>, 123 AD2d 270, 270 [1986]). Given the serious nature of the charged conduct and the absence of extraordinary circumstances, it cannot be said that the probationary sentence was either harsh or excessive (<i>see People v Higgins</i>, 19 AD3d 877 [2005]<i>, lv denied</i> 5 NY3d 828 [2005]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><p></p><div align="center"></div>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: April 17, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### § 3834.12 How will BLM know for which mining claims or sites I am paying the fees?

When you pay any fees to BLM, you must include a list of the mining claims or sites that you are paying for by claim name, and by the BLM serial number if BLM has notified you what the serial numbers are.
#### § 3171.11 Onsite inspection.

The onsite inspection must be conducted before the APD will be considered complete.
### PART VII—WASH SALES; STRADDLES

Sec.
1091.
Loss from wash sales of stock or securities.
1092.
Straddles.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1981**—Pub. L. 97–34, title V, §501(d)(1), (2), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 326, 327, substituted as part heading "WASH SALES; STRADDLES" for "WASH SALES OF STOCK OR SECURITIES" and added item 1092.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. PATRICK OPUNUI Jr.,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 22

- 10129
D.C. No. 1:20

- cr - 00122

- DKW

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Derrick K. Watson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 14, 2023 * *
Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. Patrick Opunui Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see United
States v. Keller , 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 20 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 10129

Opunui contends that he is entitled to compassionate release because his pre

existing medical conditions were exacerbated by a prior COVID

- 19 infection and
the Bureau of Prisons has not provided

— and is incapable of providing

— ad equate
medical care

. The record does not support t his contention

. Opunui did not show
that his medical conditions were being in adequately managed by prison staff or were exacerbated by his COVID

- 19 infection ; indeed , he had been vaccinated against COVID

- 19 , he was offered a booster, and he was asymptomatic when he was infected. On this record, the district did not abuse its discretion in concluding
that Opunui lacke d extraordinary and compelling reasons for release

. See United
States v. Robertson , 895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (a district court abuses its discretion only if its decision is illogical, implausible, or not supported by the record).
Insofar as O punui contends that the district court should have considered his post

- sentencing rehabilitation, he has not shown what reha bilitative steps he has
taken

. Moreover, in light of Opunui’s offense conduct and criminal history, the
district court did not abus e its discretion in concluding that the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)
factors weighed against release

. AFFIRMED.
#### Atkinson *et al.,*commissioners, *v.*Bailey.

November 16, 1910

Mandamus. Before Judge Conyers. Camden superior court. May 14, 1910.

*Harry F. Dunwody,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Osborne*<£• *Lawrence,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

Considered together, sections 5401, .5402, and 4385 of the Civil Code of 1895 constitute a general law, providing for the compensation of the sheriffs of the State for official duties performed by them. Therefore, the act of the General Assembly approved August 6, 1903 (Acts 1903, p. 392), entitled “An act to authorize the county commissioners of roads and revenues of Camden county to pay to the sheriff of said Camden county a salary of four hundred dollars annually in addition to the fees allowed by law to said sheriff whenever the same is recommended by the grand jury of said Camden county, and for other purposes,” being a special law, is void, because in violation of that provision of the constitution of the State (Civil Code, § 5732) which declares that “Laws of a general nature shall have uniform ope- ation throughout the State, and no special law shall be enacted in any case for which provision has been made by an existing general law.” Accordingly, the judge of the superior court erred in granting, upon the application of the sheriff of Camden county, a mandamus absolute requiring the plaintiffs in error, the commissioners of roads and revenues of such county, to levy sufficient taxes for the year 1910 to pay the sum of four hundred dollars claimed by the sheriff as salary under the special act of August 6, 1903.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., disqualified.*
§ 4.1376 Petition for temporary relief from notice of proposed suspension or rescission or notice of suspension or rescission; appeals from decisions granting or denying temporary relief. ( a ) Any party may file a petition for temporary relief from the notice of proposed suspension or rescission or the notice of suspension or rescission in conjunction with the filing of the request for review or at any time before an initial decision is issued by the administrative law judge.
( b ) The petition for temporary relief shall be filed with the administrative law judge to whom the request for review has been assigned. If none has been assigned, the petition shall be filed with the Hearings Division, Office of Hearings and Appeals, U.S. Department of the Interior.
( c ) The petition for temporary relief shall include: ( 1 ) A statement of the specific relief requested;
( 2 ) A detailed statement of why temporary relief should be granted, including— ( i ) A showing that there is a substantial likelihood that petitioner will prevail on the merits, and
( ii ) A showing that the relief sought will not adversely affect the public health or safety or cause significant, imminent environmental harm to land, air or water resources;
( 3 ) A statement whether the petitioner requests an evidentiary hearing.
( d ) Any party may file a response to the petition no later than 5 days after it was served and may request a hearing even if the petitioner has not done so.
( e ) The administrative law judge may hold a hearing on any issue raised by the petition within 10 days of the filing of responses to the petition, and shall do so if a hearing is requested by any party.
( f ) The administrative law judge shall issue an order or decision granting or denying the petition for temporary relief within 5 days of the date of a hearing on the petition or, if no hearing is held, of service of the responses to the petition on all parties.
( g ) The administrative law judge may only grant temporary relief if: ( 1 ) All parties to the proceeding have been notified of the petition and have had an opportunity to respond and a hearing has been held if requested;
( 2 ) The petitioner has demonstrated a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits; and
( 3 ) Temporary relief will not adversely affect public health or safety or cause significant, imminent harm to land, air or water resources.
( h ) Any party may file an appeal of an order or decision granting or denying temporary relief with the Board within 30 days of receipt of the order or decision or, in the alternative, may seek judicial review within 30 days in accordance with section 526(a) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. 1276(a). If an appeal is filed with the Board, the Board shall issue an expedited briefing schedule and shall decide the appeal expeditiously.
[59 FR 54326, Oct. 28, 1994, as amended at 67 FR 4368, Jan. 30, 2002; 67 FR 61512, Oct. 1, 2002; 88 FR 5796, Jan. 30, 2023]
#### § 3513.33 When will my suspension of operations (economic concerns) take effect?

Your suspension will be effective on the date BLM specifies. You do not have to pay royalty on minimum annual production beginning on the first day of the next lease month after the suspension becomes effective. If the effective date is the first of the month, you may stop paying royalty on minimum annual production on that day.
#### § 3440.1 Terms.
# CVPIA Charges

# image1.png
Docket No. FAA-2011-1062
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc. a
Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSBA for the year ending December
31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Gary Rasmussen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc., and will be retained by Global
Entertainment Holdings, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.




Date
      October 31, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Gary
      RasmussenName Gary
      RasmussenTitle Chief
      Executive Officer
#### § 3192.5 How do I modify a cooperative agreement?

You may modify a cooperative agreement by having all parties to the agreement consent to the change in writing. If the agreement is with a State, and the modification would affect the duration or scope of the agreement, then the State must obtain the written consent of the affected Tribe and/or allottee or heir.
#### Della Guise, Respondent, v. Mangeorge Realty Corporation, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
# Controlled Document

Controlled Documents are maintained electronically. Verify printed documents are

current prior to use. Last printed: 11/1/2011 3:53 PM 

# POT HOOD INSPECTION S UMMARY CRITERIA

For visuals, see Pot Hood Inspection Visuals



## Document Change History Document Owner: Ben Lengerich

REVISION

DATE NATURE OF REVISION DOCUMENT REVIEW

PARTICIPANTS

5/15 /08 Date of Ori ginal Document Issuance Ben Lengerich, Tom Burke

5/29/08 Added link to visuals Ben Lengerich

8/29/08 Added toe plate to end panel Ben Lengerich

6/15/09 Reviewed and revised criteria. Added “golf ball/softball” terminology. Barry Hullett, Tia Daulph, Da ve Umbaugh, Tracy Johnson , Kathryn

Mitchell 

# G ood

• No Corrective action required

• Seal tight

• Emissions captured

• Insignificant damage 

# F air

• Corrective action required

— within 15 days.

• Seal not tight

• Emissions possible

• Damage present 

# P oor

• Immediate corrective action required

— within 5 days.

• Seal not adequ ate

• Emissions probable

• Significant damage
present 

# R epair 

# SPA

1. Doors (Measuring or Tap) Door Gap

< 1⁄2 inch Door Gap

1⁄2

- 3 inch Door Gap

> 3 inch Emission Control

Broken hinge

(still shuts) Broken hinge or missing door (doesn’t shut) Maintenance

2. Sk in Repair Collectively: holes/gaps

< golf ball (4 sq in) Collectively: holes/gaps

2

- 4 golf balls Collectively: holes/gaps

> soft ball Emission Control

3. Pan Damage

< 1 foot Damage

1

– 3 feet Damage

> 3 feet Potlines: small bends (<45°) Maint: large ben ds (>45°)

4.a Fabric:

Bottom Damage

< 3 foot Damage

3

– 6 feet Damage

> 6 feet Emission Control

4.b Fabric: Top Damage

< 1 foot Damage

1

– 3 feet Damage

> 3 feet Emission Control

5. End

Panel Gap at widest point Includes toe plate

< 1 inch Gap at wide st point Includes toe plate

1

- 3 inches Gap at widest point Or toe plate missing

>3 inches Emission Control

7. Stem

Seals Stem Seal damaged (< 2 in gap) Stem Seal Damaged (2

– 4 in gap) Stem Seal damaged (> 4 sq in gap) Potlines 

### Revision date:

6/15/09
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Harriet E. Eisenhauer, Respondent, against Society of the New York Hospital et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board ia *833favor of the claimant. Appellants contend there was no evidence to sustain findings to the effect that claimant’s disability, which was occasioned by tuberculosis, was due to her having contracted the disease while in the employ of employer appellant. The evidence and applicable presumptions support the award. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Poster and Bussell, JJ.
#### Paul Drapkin, Appellant, v. Ryan Contracting Corporation, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
Case 0:99-cv-06089-WDF Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/1999 Page 1 of 7
Case 0:99-cv-06089-WDF Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/1999 Page 2 of 7
Case 0:99-cv-06089-WDF Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/1999 Page 3 of 7
Case 0:99-cv-06089-WDF Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/1999 Page 4 of 7
Case 0:99-cv-06089-WDF Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/1999 Page 5 of 7
Case 0:99-cv-06089-WDF Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/1999 Page 6 of 7
Case 0:99-cv-06089-WDF Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/1999 Page 7 of 7
#### In the Matter of the Application of William W. Farley, as State Commissioner of Excise, etc., for an Order Revoking and Canceling Liquor Tax Certificate No. 20,973, Issued to Joseph H. Miller.

Motion for stay granted, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the annual
report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the Issuer).



I, Robert J. Cooney, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: February 17, 2005



/s/ Robert J. CooneyName: Robert J. Cooney
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 797

 638

 567

 532

 532

 555

 606

 649

 662

 657

 666

 629

 608

 573

 492

 377

 388

 372

 362

 366

 352

 349

 353

 368

 391

 407

 386

 367

 354

 347

 635

 554

 479

 455

 444

 508

 563

 600

 630

 572

 563

 544

 519

 500

 365

 355

 349

 336

 339

 332

 327

 330

 329

 335

 369

 384

 349

 332

 312

 325

 736

 599

 522

 498

 499

 538

 588

 628

 647

 614

 611

 587

 568

 537

 434

 366

 370

 351

 351

 353

 339

 339

 341

 349

 380

 396

 368

 347

 331

 336

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 736

 1,335

 1,857

 2,355

 2,854

 3,392

 3,980

 4,608

 5,255

 5,869

 6,480

 7,067

 7,635

 8,172

 8,606

 8,972

 9,342

 9,693

 10,044

 10,397

 10,736

 11,075

 11,416

 11,765

 12,145

 12,541

 12,909

 13,256

 13,587

 13,923

 736

 668

 619

 589

 571

 565

 569

 576

 584

 587

 589

 589

 587

 584

 574

 561

 550

 539

 529

 520

 511

 503

 496

 490

 486

 482

 478

 473

 469

 464

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### § 2650.4-1 Existing rights and contracts.

Any conveyance issued for surface and subsurface rights under this act will be subject to any lease, contract, permit, right-of-way, or easement and the rights of the lessee, contractee, permittee, or grantee to the complete enjoyment of all rights, privileges, and benefits thereby granted him.