alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

|   | (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                             |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      John daCosta                                            |   |   |   |   |
| John      daCostaChief      Financial OfficerMarch      31, 2008 |   |   |   |   |
16140
      SAND CANYON AVE., SUITE 100


IRVINE,
      CALIFORNIA 92618


**H** **ALL** **&** **C** **OMPANY** **** *Certified
      Public Accountants, Inc* *.*  (949)
      910-HALL (4255)


TAX,
      FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES  FAX
      (949)
      910-4256

















**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





We
      consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 10-KSB (File No.
      000-33309) of our report dated April 14, 2005 on our audits of the financial
      statements of GlobeTrac Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the years
      then ended.








/s/
      Hall & Company


Hall
      & Company


Irvine,
      California


March
      31,
      2006
First Department,

March, 1948.

(March 1, 1948.)

#### Edith Sackheim, Appellant, *v.*Miki Berger, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The main question presented on this appeal concerns the propriety of the judgment granted on the counterclaim. Defendant claimed damages for breach of contract on plaintiff’s part of an order for certain flat coiled rings; plaintiff claims that no order was ever given and that no oral contract was ever made. On defendant’s own testimony it is shown that no oral contract, complete as to its terms, was entered into. Defendant relied on a written order which coneededly was never signed by plaintiff and was inadmissible, on objection, as not in compliance with the requirements of the Statute of Frauds. To take the case out of the Statute of Frauds, defendant urged that there had been both partial delivery and partial payment of the order. It is clear, however, that the samples which were delivered prior to the supposed date of the purchase order could not have been delivered in satisfaction of part performance of the contract. It is also obvious that the money paid was on account of an existing debt and had no reference to a contract the terms of which never had been agreed to.

The judgment, so far as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs to the appellant, the counterclaim dismissed and the judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff as demanded in the complaint, with costs.

Peek, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, the counterclaim dismissed and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff as demanded in the complaint, with costs. Settle order on notice.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 21, 2016

a0914 

# Order

Clerk September 21, 2016

151280

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151280

COA: 325412

Alpena CC: 14

- 005716

- FH

RAYMOND CLARENCE GEDDERT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of July 28, 2015, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the

application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2015 orde r of the Court of Appeals. On

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal,

we VACATE the sentence of the Alpena Circuit Court and we REMAND this case to the

trial court for resentencing. The trial c ourt assigned no points to any Offense V ariables

(OVs), but departed from the sentencing guidelines range in part because of the

defendant’s pattern of prior narcotics offenses. In light of this, based on facts reported in

the presentence information report, the trial court was required to assign 10 points to OV

13 for a pattern of three or more controlled

- substance felonies. MCL 777.43(1)(e). Even

though the guidelines ranges are now advisory, the scoring of the guidelines themselves

is mandatory, and the OVs must be assigned the highest number of points applicable.

MCL 777.43(1); People v Lockridge , 498 Mich 358, 392 n 28 (2015) . Because

correcting the OV score would change the applicable guidelines range, resentencing is

required. People v Francisco , 474 Mich 82 (2006).

We do not retain jurisdiction.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn approach for relating the results of quantitative nondestructive evaluation to intrinsic properties of high-performance materialsOne of the most difficult problems the manufacturing community has faced during recent years has been to accurately assess the physical state of anisotropic high-performance materials by nondestructive means. In order to advance the design of ultrasonic nondestructive testing systems, a more fundamental understanding of how ultrasonic waves travel and interact within the anisotropic material is needed. The relationship between the ultrasonic and engineering parameters needs to be explored to understand their mutual dependence. One common denominator is provided by the elastic constants. The preparation of specific graphite/epoxy samples to be used in the experimental investigation of the anisotropic properties (through the measurement of the elastic stiffness constants) is discussed. Accurate measurements of these constants will depend upon knowledge of refraction effects as well as the direction of group velocity propagation. The continuing effort for the development of improved visualization techniques for physical parameters is discussed. Group velocity images are presented and discussed. In order to fully understand the relationship between the ultrasonic and the common engineering parameters, the physical interpretation of the linear elastic coefficients (the quantities that relate applied stresses to resulting strains) are discussed. This discussion builds a more intuitional understanding of how the ultrasonic parameters are related to the traditional engineering parameters.Document ID19900016039Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMiller, James G.*(Washington Univ. Saint Louis, MO, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186484NAS 1.26:186484Accession Number90N25355Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NSG-1601Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016039.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-21751-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 14 of 14
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,335.83

 2,336.13

 2,336.43

 2,336.74

 2,337.06

 2,337.35

 2,337.65

 2,337.75

 2,337.92

 2,338.10

 2,338.31

 2,338.55

 2,338.79

 2,339.20

 2,339.78

 2,340.45

 2,340.96

 2,341.88

 2,343.12

 2,344.16

 2,345.85

 2,347.05

 2,347.87

 2,348.76

 2,349.41

 2,350.04

 2,350.54

 2,350.99

 2,351.57

 2,352.26

 2,352.84

 1,926.8

 1,931.0

 1,935.3

 1,939.7

 1,944.2

 1,948.4

 1,952.6

 1,954.1

 1,956.5

 1,959.1

 1,962.1

 1,965.5

 1,969.0

 1,974.9

 1,983.2

 1,992.9

 2,000.3

 2,013.7

 2,031.8

 2,047.0

 2,072.0

 2,089.8

 2,102.0

 2,115.3

 2,125.0

 2,134.5

 2,142.0

 2,148.8

 2,157.6

 2,168.0

 2,176.9

STORAGE

+4.8

+4.2

+4.3

+4.4

+4.5

+4.1

+4.3

+1.4

+2.4

+2.6

+3.0

+3.4

+3.4

+5.9

+8.4

+9.7

+7.4

+13.4

+18.1

+15.3

+24.9

+17.8

+12.2

+13.3

+9.7

+9.5

+7.5

+6.8

+8.8

+10.5

+8.8

CHANGE

2,976

2,763

2,725

2,830

2,724

2,455

2,336

3,491

3,521

3,724

4,727

3,892

4,533

4,536

5,693

6,516

5,433

8,336

10,532

9,307

14,316

10,765

7,808

8,374

6,477

6,340

5,355

4,994

4,816

5,480

4,767

INFLOW

 514

 594

 545

 583

 424

 356

 178

 2,772

 2,281

 2,403

 3,166

 2,094

 2,747

 1,534

 1,366

 1,622

 1,675

 1,571

 1,365

 1,580

 1,731

 1,755

 1,592

 1,631

 1,550

 1,547

 1,555

 1,538

 347

 180

 238

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 57

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 42

 29

 33

 29

 8

 13

 0

 0

 17

 21

 42

 63

 51

 30

 55

 9

 34

 21

 39

 35

 17

 35

 57

 35

 13

 22

 0

 36

 45

 31

 89

C.F.S.

 .10

 .07

 .08

 .07

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .05

 .10

 .15

 .12

 .07

 .13

 .02

 .08

 .05

 .09

 .08

 .04

 .08

 .13

 .08

 .03

 .05

 .00

 .08

 .10

 .07

 .20

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .30

 .15

 .08

 .23

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .00

 .18

 .20

 .10

 .48

 .13

 .00

 .73

 .33

 .05

 .56

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2017 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 13, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +254.8 172,542 43,034 0 59 951 2.21 3.97

ACRE-FEET +254,800 342,237 85,358 0 117 1,886

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 85,358

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 117

 85,475

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.97

JULY 1, 2016 38.99

 1,922.0

Table 4

(1) (1)

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 38.99
### §458ff. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458ff was editorially reclassified as section 5366 of this title.
### §443d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 443d was editorially reclassified as section 1685 of this title.
§ 3440.1-2 Qualifications. ( a ) An individual, association or individuals, municipality, charitable organization or relief agency may hold a license to mine. A municipality shall file the information required under § 3472.2-5(b) of this title.
( b ) A license to mine shall not be issued to a private corporation.
( c ) A license to mine shall not be issued to a minor, but may be issued to a legal guardian on behalf of a minor.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ron Hadani, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Vision-Sciences, Inc.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablelikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|                                     | /s/ Ron Hadani          |   |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  November 14, 2003 | Ron Hadani              |
|                                     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Coast Bancorp for the year endedDecember 31, 2004, I, Berta Olson, Chief Financial Officer of Coast Bancorp,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

 

(1)           such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB ofCoast Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           the information contained in suchAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB of Coast Bancorp for the year ended December 31,2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Coast Bancorp.

 

Dated:  March 29, 2005 

 
|   |    /s/  Berta Olson |   |
|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|   | BERTA OLSON                        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer            |   |
|   | (Principal Financial  Officer)     |   |
|        |                                    |        |  |

 

----
Sacramento

River

Wood Lake

Butte Creek

SSUUTTTTEE RR CCOO

CCOOLLUUSSAA CC OO

82.7 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-2916A-R-1

Exhibit B

Fedora, Sibley G. and Margaret L.

725-202-50

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

Date: November 5, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\fedora_sibley_g_and_margaret_l\fedora_sibley_g_and_margaret_l.mxd
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Graham
      Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by In Veritas Medical
      Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.




November
      __, 2007





/s/
                Graham Cooper
              Graham
                Cooper
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 2812.3-2 Other roads and rights-of-way controlled by applicant.

In addition to the private road systems and rights-of-way described in § 2812.3-1 in the event the applicant controls directly or indirectly other roads or rights-of-way in any O. and C. area where the authorized officer of the Bureau finds that, as of the time of filing or during the pendency of the application, the United States is unreasonably denied access to its timber for management purposes or where, as of such time, competitive bidding by all prospective purchasers of timber managed by the Bureau in the O. and C. area, or of other Federal timber intermingled with or adjacent to such timber, is substantially precluded by reason of the applicant's control, direct or indirect, of such roads or rights-of-way, the authorized officer may require the applicant to negotiate an agreement granting to the United States and its licensees the right to use, in accordance with the terms and conditions of this paragraph such portion of such roads or rights-of-way as may be necessary to accommodate such management or competitive bidding.
### §698. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 733, §8, 68 Stat. 726, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to any tribe or to a public or nonprofit body any federally owned property deemed necessary for public use and from which members of the tribes would derive benefits, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
IN REPLY REFER TO: 

MP-3400 

2.2.4.22 

United States Department of the Interior 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 

Interior Region I 0 

2800 Cottage Way 

Sacramento, California 95825- I 898 

NOV 2 1 2019 

To: All Central Valley Project Water Contractors 

Subject: Statement of Central Valley Project (CVP) Cumulative Irrigation and Municipal and 

Industrial (M&I) Operations for the f iscal Year (FY) ending September 30, 2018 

Dear Water Contractor: 

Enclosed are your annual statements of account for your CVP Irrigation and M&I water service 

contracts, as of September 30, 2018. 

Information contained in the annual statements is as follows: 

a. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) outstanding balance as of 

September 30, 2018 ( enclosure 1 ). This enclosure is provided if there is an outstanding 

balance. 

b. Construction and deficit balances as of September 30, 2018, including payments applied in 

the current period. 

c. Trinity Public Utility District Assessment over or underpayments for October I, 20 14 

through September 30, 2018. Since this amount is still subject to reconciliations, 

Reclamation may refund 60 percent of overpayments per contractor request if the 

overpayment identified on the statement is over $ 100. If you would like to request a refund, 

please make your request to Jesus Reynoso. Overpayments that are under $ 100 on the 

statement, are to be applied to future TPUD assessments. 

The enclosed statements are provided for informational purposes only and a re not a bill. 

Voluntary payments can be made to pay off all or a portion of your construction, deficit(s), or 

ARRA costs pursuant to the Voluntary Payment Policy. The Voluntary Payment Poli cy can be 

found on Reclamation's website at http://www.usbr.gov/mp/cvp/laws.html. Voluntary payments 

can be sent with a copy of this analysis to: 

Bureau of Reclamation 

Mid-Pacific Region 

PO Box 6200-24 

Portland, OR 97228-6200 

INTERIOR REGION 10 • CALIFORNIA-GREAT BASIN 

CALIFORNIA .. , NEV ADA•, OREGON• ' PARTIAL 
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Jesus Reynoso by 

email at jrevnoso@usbr.gov or by phone at 916-978-5362. For ·n ·y access call the Federal 

Relay Service at 800-877-8339. 

Sincerely, 

Atrn Lubas-Williams 

Financial Manager 

INTERIOR REGION 10 • CALIFORNIA-GREAT BASIN 

CALIFORNIA", NEVADA", OREGON" • PARTIAL
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ALLEN RUSSELL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1877 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 4, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Peter F. Estrada, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### § 3513.11 May BLM relieve me of the lease requirements of rental, minimum royalty, or production royalty while continuing to hold the lease?

Yes. The BLM has a process that may allow you temporary relief from these lease requirements in accordance with 30 U.S.C. 209.

[85 FR 67680, Oct. 26, 2020]