alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Theodore Tsagkaris,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form  10-KSB of Tari Inc.,  for the fiscal  year ended  March 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Tari Inc.

Date:  July 7, 2004

                                                /s/ Theodore Tsagkaris
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Theodore Tsagkaris
                                                President, C.E.O. and Director
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 2542.4 Patent. ( a ) Upon submission of satisfactory proof of publication and the expiration of the time allowed for the filing of objections against the application, if there be no protest, contest or other objection against the application, patent will then be issued by the authorizing officer.
( b ) There will be incorporated in patents issued on applications under the above Act, the following:
Excepting and reserving, however, to the United States, the coal and all other minerals in the land so patented, together with the right of the United States or its permittees, lessees, or grantees, to enter upon said lands for the purpose of prospecting for and mining such deposits as provided for under the Act of February 23, 1932 (47 Stat. 53).
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J. Cowan, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| August 11, 2009 | /s/ Mark J. Cowan |
|-----------------|-------------------|

|   | Mark J. Cowan |
|--------|---------------|

|   | President and Treasurer |
|--------|-------------------------|
San Mateo, CA
                                                             January 28, 1999
                                                             $110,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of one hundred ten thousand dollars ($110,000), with interest from
the date hereof at a rate of ten percent (10%) per annum,  which amount shall be
secured  by all of the  assets  of  Borrower.  Said  principal  shall be due and
payable on demand by  Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,  but in no
event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred eighty (180) days after
the date of this Note. This Note may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1. Subordination - Creditor  subordinates to Imperial Bank ("Bank") any
security  interest or lien that  Creditor  may have in any property of Borrower.
All Subordinated  Debt is subordinated in right of payment to all obligations of
Borrower to Bank now existing or hereafter arising.

         2.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         3. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         4.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 28 day of January, 1999.

                                            Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                            By: __________________

                                            Title: ________________
#### § 3508.20 How will BLM conduct the sale and handle bids?

We will open and announce all bids at the time and date specified in the notice of lease sale, but we will not accept or reject bids at that time. We must receive your bid by the deadline in the sale notice or we will not consider it. You may withdraw or modify your bid before the time specified in the notice of sale.
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Air Division

Technical Support Document

For The

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Rule 101, General Provisions and Definitions

Prepared by: Cynthia G. Allen

Reviewed by: Andrew Steckel

April 2012
AGENCY: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District 

Submittal Date: February 23, 2012

Adoption Date: October 27, 2011

Completeness Date: March 13, 2012

Submitted Rule: Rule 101, General Provisions and Definitions

Applicable SIP: Submitted on October 27, 1998 (adopted on September 3, 1998

and approved on March 19, 1999) (64 FR 13514)

Background:

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) is 

currently designated as a nonattainment area for both the state and federal ozone 

standards. Since volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are a precursor to ozone, one of the 

strategies to control ozone pollution is to reduce VOC emissions from existing stationary 

sources by establishing more stringent VOC emission limits. One method for complying 

with low VOC emission limits is through the use of organic compounds with negligible 

reactivity for ozone formation, also known as exempt compounds. The exempt 

compounds are listed in SMAQMD Rule 101, General Provisions and Definitions.

Rule Summary: 

SMAQMD Rule 101, General Provisions and Definitions, is being amended to update 

the Exempt Compounds list to conform to the Exempt Compounds list of the EPA. 

Compounds that have low atmospheric photochemical reactions are considered to 

have a negligible level of reactivity. It has been EPA’s policy that organic compounds 

with a negligible level of reactivity do not need to be regulated to reduce ozone. The 

EPA lists negligibly reactive compounds in its regulation (at 40 CFR 51.100(s)) and 

excludes them from the definition of VOCs.

The following compounds are being added to the exempt compounds list: 

 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptabluoro-3-methoxy-propane (n-C3F7OCH3 or HFE-7000)

 3-ethoxy-1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,-dodecafluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl) hexane (HFE7500)

 Methyl formate (HCOOCH3)

 1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5-decafluoro-3-methoxy-4-tribluoromethyl-pentane (HFE-7300)

 Dimethyl carbonate

 Propylene carbonate
Minor changes are being made to add to the common names for two existing 

compounds already included in Rule 101:

 HFE-7100 for 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4-nonafluoro-4-methoxy-butane (C4F9OCH3)

 HFE-7200 for 1-ethoxy-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-nonafluorobutane (C4F9OC2H5)

SMAQMD does not anticipate any emissions changes or any significant impacts to 

regulated sources or the AQMD resulting from the amendments to Rule 101.

EPA Evaluation

Amended Rule 101 poses no significant cost to industry and no significant 

environmental impact.

EPA is recommending approval of SMAQMD Rule 101 under section 110(k) as 

meeting the requirements of section 110(a) and Part D of the Clean Air Act, as amended 

in 1990. 

Attachments

1. Submitted Rule 101, General Provisions and Definitions (adopted October 27, 

2011)

2. SIP Approved Rule 101 (adopted September 3, 1998).

3. Strikeout/underline version of Rule 101.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 22, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 22, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0090. EDWARD MONARCHIK, JR. v. COLLEEN MONARCHIK.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2019CV319238
### §5113. Revolving fund; appropriation for loans

There is authorized to be appropriated, out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $20,000,000 to be established as a revolving fund from which the Secretary of the Interior, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, may make loans to Indian chartered corporations for the purpose of promoting the economic development of such tribes and of their members, and may defray the expenses of administering such loans. Repayment of amounts loaned under this authorization shall be credited to the revolving fund and shall be available for the purposes for which the fund is established.

(June 18, 1934, ch. 576, §10, 48 Stat. 986; Pub. L. 86–533, §1(16), June 29, 1960, 74 Stat. 248; Pub. L. 87–250, Sept. 15, 1961, 75 Stat. 520.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 470 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1961—Pub. L. 87–250 substituted "$20,000,000" for "$10,000,000".

1960—Pub. L. 86–533 repealed provisions which required a report to be made annually to the Congress of transactions under the authorization.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Administration of Fund

Funds from diverse sources to be administered as a single Indian Revolving Loan Fund after Apr. 12, 1974, see section 1461 of this title.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-30359

Conference Calendar

 

ZEBEDEE HUTCHINSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

REBA PRUDHOMME,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-2323 

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Zebedee Hutchinson (“Hutchinson”), Louisiana state prisoner

#98608, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Hutchinson argues that prison

personnel mishandled and embezzled funds deposited in his inmate

account. We review a dismissal for failure to state a claim de
No. 03-30359

-2-

novo. See Harper v. Showers, 174 F.3d 716, 718 & n.3 (5th Cir.

1999).

Hutchinson has failed to establish a due process claim

because a post-deprivation tort cause of action in state law is

sufficient to satisfy the requirements of due process. See

Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984); Caine v. Hardy, 943

F.2d 1406, 1413 (5th Cir. 1991)(en banc). Louisiana provides an

adequate post-deprivation remedy for property loss claims. See

Marshall v. Norwood, 741 F.2d 761, 763-64 (5th Cir. 1984); LA.

CIV. CODE ANN. art. 2315 (West 2002).

Hutchinson’s appeal is without arguable merit and is

dismissed as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). The dismissal of the

appeal as frivolous and the district court’s dismissal of

Hutchinson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and for

failure to state a claim each count as a “strike” under the

three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.

Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Hutchinson is

CAUTIONED that if he accumulates three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in

any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or

detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING ISSUED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6630

BRUCE ALLEN BUCKNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RHPD SERGEANT CASTRO, Police Sergeant; RHPD OFFICER KUNDE, Police 

Officer; RHPD OFFICER ROBIN GANDER, Police Officer; RHPD OFFICER ANDREW 

HEMS, Police Officer; RHPD OFFICER JERRY SANDERS, Police Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

and

ROCK HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT, in their official capacity,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (0:20-cv-03253-TLW)

Submitted: October 13, 2022 Decided: October 18, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6630 Doc: 27 Filed: 10/18/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Bruce Allen Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Paul Golson, David Leon Morrison, 

MORRISON LAW FIRM, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6630 Doc: 27 Filed: 10/18/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Allen Buckner appeals the district court’s order and judgment accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil rights complaint without 

prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm. Buckner v. Sergeant Castro, No. 0:20-cv-03253-TLW (D.S.C. May 9, 2022). We 

also deny Buckner’s motions to clarify and vacate the order. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6630 Doc: 27 Filed: 10/18/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
### **[Subchapter E—Repealed]**
- Untitled
- Untitled

    - CtrSpecExh1SutterAtt9: Contractor Specific, Sutter Exhibit 1, Attach. 9
#### § 3602.25 What rights and responsibilities does my assignee assume?

When BLM approves your assignment, your assignee is entitled to all the rights and is subject to all the obligations under the contract.
### §633. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Apr. 19, 1950, ch. 92, §3, 64 Stat. 45, which provided that Navajo and Hopi Indians be given preference in employment and on-the-job training for projects undertaken pursuant to this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 828.26

 828.20

 828.13

 828.06

 827.98

 827.90

 827.80

 827.80

 827.70

 827.75

 827.67

 827.54

 827.42

 827.30

 827.20

 826.99

 826.87

 826.97

 826.86

 826.83

 826.80

 826.77

 826.74

 826.72

 826.70

 826.64

 826.60

 826.55

 826.50

 826.40

 826.33

 35.32

 35.26

 35.18

 35.11

 35.02

 34.94

 34.83

 34.83

 34.73

 34.78

 34.70

 34.56

 34.43

 34.31

 34.20

 33.98

 33.86

 33.96

 33.85

 33.82

 33.78

 33.75

 33.72

 33.70

 33.68

 33.62

 33.58

 33.52

 33.47

 33.37

 33.30

STORAGE

-0.08

-0.06

-0.07

-0.08

-0.09

-0.09

-0.11

+0.00

-0.11

+0.05

-0.09

-0.14

-0.13

-0.13

-0.11

-0.22

-0.13

+0.11

-0.12

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.02

-0.02

-0.06

-0.04

-0.05

-0.05

-0.10

-0.07

CHANGE

236

236

232

228

223

221

198

227

212

295

220

195

198

195

207

147

197

317

203

243

244

245

244

250

253

230

240

236

237

212

228

INFLOW

 15

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

SPILL

 247

 247

 247

 247

 247

 246

 228

 205

 246

 250

 249

 250

 249

 249

 249

 249

 249

 249

 248

 248

 248

 248

 249

 248

 248

 247

 247

 248

 248

 248

 248

OUTLET

 12

 11

 12

 9

 9

 8

 13

 12

 9

 8

 9

 9

 8

 5

 6

 4

 6

 10

 8

 6

 7

 8

 6

 8

 10

 10

 9

 9

 10

 11

 11

C.F.S.

 .36

 .33

 .35

 .27

 .26

 .24

 .38

 .34

 .26

 .25

 .28

 .27

 .23

 .16

 .19

 .13

 .19

 .30

 .23

 .18

 .20

 .25

 .19

 .25

 .30

 .30

 .28

 .28

 .29

 .33

 .33

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .47

 .00

 .00

 .55

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 RUN DATE: 07/24/2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -2.13 7,049 7,626 210 273 8.20 1.17

ACRE-FEET -2,130 13,982 15,126 417 541

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 417

OUTLET

TOTAL

 15,126

 15,543

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.17

JULY 1, 2014 19.57

 35.40

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
§ 2374.1 Property determinations. ( a ) When the authorized officer of the Bureau of Land Management determines that the holding agency has complied with the regulations of this part and that the lands or interests in lands other than minerals are not suitable for return to the public domain for disposition under the general public land laws, because the lands are substantially changed in character by improvements or otherwise, he will request the appropriate officer of the General Services Administration, or its delegate, to concur in his determination.
( b ) When the authorized officer of the Bureau of Land Management determines that minerals in lands subject to the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section are not suitable for disposition under the public land mining or mineral leasing laws, he will notify the appropriate officer of the General Services Administration or its delegate of this determination.
( c ) Upon receipt of the concurrence specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the authorized officer of the Bureau of Land Management will notify the holding agency to report as excess property the lands and improvements therein, or interests in lands to the General Services Administration pursuant to the regulations of that Administration. The authorized officer of the Bureau of Land Management will request the holding agency to include minerals in its report to the General Services Administration only when the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section apply. He will also submit to the holding agency, for transmittal with its report to the General Services Administration, information of record in the Bureau of Land Management on the claims, if any, by agencies other than the holding agency of primary, joint, or secondary jurisdiction over the lands and on any encumbrances under the public land laws.
[35 FR 9559, June 13, 1970]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated May 21, 2004, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on June 3, 2004, (69 FR 31414), Research Triangle Institute, Kenneth H. Davis Jr., Hermann Building East Institute Drive, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ICocaine (9041)
II
 The Institute will manufacture small quantities of cocaine derivates and marihuana derivatives for use by their customers primarily in analytical kits, reagents and standards. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Research Triangle Institute to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Research Triangle Institute to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: September 8, 2004. William J. Walker, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 04-21951  Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
### §1052. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 88–506, §2, Aug. 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 639, which authorized distribution to tribal members of prorated shares of funds appropriated for a certain judgment against the United States, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3516.20 Is there an annual fee or charge for use of the lands?

Yes. You must pay the annual $1 per acre rental, or $20, whichever is greater, on or before the anniversary date of the permit.