alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4.24 Basis of decision. ( a ) *Record.* ( 1 ) The record of a hearing shall consist of the transcript of testimony or summary of testimony and exhibits together with all documents and requests filed in the hearing.
( 2 ) If a hearing has been held on an appeal pursuant to instructions of an Appeals Board, this record shall be the sole basis for decision insofar as the referred issues of fact are involved except to the extent that official notice may be taken of a fact as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( 3 ) Where a hearing has been held in other proceedings, the record made shall be the sole basis for decision except to the extent that official notice may be taken of a fact as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( 4 ) In any case, no decision after a hearing or on appeal shall be based upon any record, statement, file, or similar document which is not open to inspection by the parties to the hearing or appeal, except for documents or other evidence received or reviewed pursuant to § 4.31(d).
( b ) *Official notice.* Official notice may be taken of the public records of the Department of the Interior and of any matter of which the courts may take judicial notice.
[36 FR 7186, Apr. 15, 1971, as amended at 53 FR 49660, Dec. 9, 1988; 88 FR 5792, Jan. 30, 2023]
Mandamus DENIED and Opinion Filed April 30, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 14
- 00506
- CV IN RE ROBERT WAYNE M ITCHELL , Relator On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F08
- 00433 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Evans Opinion by Justice Fillmore Relator asks this Court to order the trial court to rule on his motion for a jud gment nunc pro tunc. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 52.8(a); In re Stat e of Tex. ex rel

. Weeks , 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding); Simon v. Levario , 306 S.W.3d 318, 320

– 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding)

. Accordingly , we deny relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus.

140506F.P05 /Robert M. Fillmore / ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, P41's/R21's.
    Date: November 5, 2004.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Hua-Chuan Sim, MD, Health Science Administrator, 
National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, Bethesda, MD 
20892.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
    Dated: September 29, 2004
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Commmittee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22407 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 3746.1 Mining locations for fissionable source materials.

(a) In view of the amendment of section 5(b)(7) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1946 by section 10(c) of the Act of August 13, 1954 (68 Stat. 708), and of the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 921), it is clear that after enactment of said Act of August 13, 1954, valid mining locations under the mining laws of the United States may be based upon a discovery of a mineral deposit which is a fissionable source material.

(b) As to mining locations made prior to the enactment of said Act of August 13, 1954, section 10(d) of the act provides:

(d) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act, and particularly sec. 5(b)(7) thereof, prior to its amendment hereby, or the provisions of the Act of August 12, 1953 (67 Stat. 539), and particularly sec. 3 thereof, any mining claim, heretofore located under the mining laws of the United States for or based upon a discovery of a mineral deposit which is a fissionable source material and which, except for the possible contrary construction of said Atomic Energy Act, would have been locatable under such mining laws, shall, insofar as adversely affected by such possible contrary construction, be valid and effective, in all respects to the same extent as if said mineral deposit were a locatable mineral deposit other than a fissionable source material.

[[35 FR 9741](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/35-FR-9741), June 13, 1970, as amended at [41 FR 50690](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/41-FR-50690), Nov. 17, 1976]

Group 3800—Mining Claims Under the General Mining Laws

Note:

The information collection requirements contained in parts 3800, 3810, 3820, 3830, 3860 and 3870 of Group 3800 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under [44 U.S.C. 3507](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/44/3507) and assigned clearance numbers 1004-0025, 1004-0104, 1004-0110 and 1004-0114. The information is being collected to permit the authorized officer to review certain proposed mining activities to ensure that they provide adequate protection of the public lands and their resources. The information will be used to make this determination. A response is required to obtain a benefit.

(See [48 FR 40890](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/48-FR-40890), Sept. 12, 1983)
#### § 3280.6 When may BLM require a unit operator to modify the rate of exploration, development, or production?

BLM may require a unit agreement applying to lands owned by the United States to contain a provision under which BLM or an entity designated in the unit agreement may alter or modify, from time-to-time, the rate of resource exploration or development, or production quantity or rate, under the unit agreement.
IRR 2011 Sch B-3B F.Z15.xlsm

9/25/2012

SCHEDULE OF IRRIGATION VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS TO BE APPLIED IN FY 2012 ACCOUNTING

(REFLECTED IN 2013 DEFICIT/CAPITAL RATES)

A B C D E F

Voluntary Voluntary Payments

Date Payments Deficit to Capital 

Facility/Contractor Received Applied to in FY 2012 Sch A-6B to Sch A-2B 

ref 

Black Butte D & R

Stony Creek WD 12/15/2011 FY 2010 1,150.07 1,150.07 $ 

Clear Creek Unit

Clear Creek CSD 10/03/2011 FY 2010 4,257.16 4,257.16 $ 

Sacramento River - Shasta

Anderson-Cottonwood ID 02/14/2012 $ 100.00 100.00 $ 

Sacramento River- Willows

Furlan, E 1/7/2012 FY 2009 22.31 22.31 $ Giovannetti 1/30/2012 FY 2008 - 2010 435.59 435.59 $ 

Wakida, T 10/6/2011 FY 1988 - 2009 $ 8,938.79 8,938.79 $ 

Total Sacramento River - Willows $ 9,396.69 $ 9,396.69 $ 

San Felipe Unit

San Benito County WD 07/2/2012 2009/2010 $ 155,630.94 $ 155,630.94 $ 

Tehama Colusa Canal

Colusa County WD 12/19/2011 FY 2010 $ 312,000.00 $ 312,000.00 $ Dunnigan WD 1/ N/A FY 2012 $ 16,846.73 $ 16,846.73 $ 

Myers Marsh MWC 5/9/2012 FY 1987 - 2008 $ 6,312.42 $ 6,312.42 $ 

Total Tehama Colusa Canal $ 335,159.15 $ 6,312.42 $ 328,846.73 $ 

Total $ 505,694.01 $ 176,847.28 328,846.73 $ $ 

Footnotes:

1/ FY 2011 overpayment applied as a voluntary payment for FY 2012 at the contractor's request
#### Dmitry Shostakovich et al., Appellants, v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, Respondent.

Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         8377839
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1533056<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    308000
<INVENTORY>                                    3438053
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              15401347
<PP&E>                                         6331933<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3550124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                30214075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7370687
<BONDS>                                        9249934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         21315355
<PREFERRED>                                      12844
<COMMON>                                         14659
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3400096)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  30214075
<SALES>                                        4707591<F3>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4783424<F4>
<CGS>                                          3312899<F5>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4622959<F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2131137
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                108000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              597534
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1970672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     41476
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2012148)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (3020367)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowance for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Net of accumulated depreciation.
<F3>Includes jukebox sales, leasing, interest and music service revenue.
<F4>Includes $75,833 of advertising revenue.
<F5>Includes cost of revenue and direct operating costs.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[4910-13-P]



## o DATE Federal Aviation Administration

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATlON

ACTION: Final.rule. "Om!"" ,Y);,"OL Airworthiness Directives; 328 Support Services GmbH (Type Celiificate Previously

_ 

# t'D Held by AvCraft Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild Domier GmbH; Domier Luftfahrt Gmbrf I T'ALI~~ 

# q<
DATE Model 328-l00 and -300 Airplanes 

### )\..-11-10 

# w~='"2lQ 

# 'A~~ RlN 2120-AA64

(DOT). ()~CURRENCES ROlmNG SY"BDl 

### {YI,-7 iN. 'A'-SIS1Ci 14CFR Part 39 "~:~ I 

### V(I'!. (' (Docket No. FAA-2010-0955; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-013-ADj Amendmen Ol}TlNGSYM L 

### Ib51,o >011-01--07 

## 39-;;;;....r AD

## ~;4:.'4

SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products list above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonl1ation (MeAT.) D~·"f. originated by anaviation authOlity ofanother country to identify and correct anunsafe "OlmNll """BDl condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: I~TrIAl.SiSIG 0,11', During maintenance on a328-100 aeroplane, acrack was found on atTim tab fitting assembly. The cause ofthe cracking was identified as stress corros]on. This condition, ifnot corrected, could lead to in-flight failure ofthe tab fitting, possibly resulting in loss ofcontrol ofthe aeroplane. 

## * * * * * * "QIj"IINGSV.,OOl We are issuing this AD to require actions tocorrect the unsafe condition onthese , products.
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58

QPM#

AIR·ANM·030·F7

Date: December 17, 2008

1

Record of Contacts

FDMS Docket No. FAA-200·W10•~~-~-- till

With whom outside the FAA. has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization

,

Person Contacted Date I

Hoeing (AR) .John (Tim) Rudkin 4/23/2010 I

ATA ,Joe White 4/23/2010 I

I

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
#### § 4.450-3 Initiation of contest.

Any person desiring to initiate a private contest must file a complaint in the proper land office (see § 1821.2-1 of chapter II of this title). The contestant must serve a copy of the complaint on the contestee not later than 30 days after filing the complaint and must file proof of such service, as required by § 4.422(c), in the office where the complaint was filed within 30 days after service.
### Allen W. Olmstead, Ph.D. 

# Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay Comments

US EPA Science Advisory Panel Meeting

– Tier 1 May 21
- 23, 2013

# Spinal Curvature or Tail Flex or Scoliosis or Bent Tail

• Lateral curvature of the tail as depicted in (B) and (C)


### • Curvature posterior to the hind limbs (B) occurs in the tail section that is resorbed during metamorphosis


### • Curvature anterior to the hind limbs (C) may be evident in the spine of metamorphosed frogs. This level of malformation may impair the tadpole’s ability to feed.



### • CRO laboratories under GLP note and record abnormal or diseased individuals.


### • Without consistent identification and recording it is difficult to understand the baseline occurrence of this condition in Xenopus tadpoles across research labs (academic, government, CRO)

• BCS 4:3 Template 2010 • September 2012 Page 2

# Spinal Curvature or Tail Flex or Scoliosis or Bent Tail

• Improvements in diet and husbandry could improve the incidence rate of this condition



### • We are not aware of any mechanism by which the development of spinal abnormalities that did not impact feeding and growth would impair the ability of the AMA to detect thyroid
- active compounds

• BCS 4:3 Template 2010 • September 2012 Page 3

# Spinal Curvature or Tail Flex or Scoliosis or Bent Tail

• BCS 4:3 Template 2010 • September 2012 Page 4

# Thyroid Histology
- Baseline

• During metamorphosis, the thyroid gland changes as it becomes more active. For example, a stage 58 thyroid compared to a stage 56 thyroid will appear hypertrophied.


### • Regardless of if the histology in the AMA is read with an external baseline (e.g. Grim et al.) or with an internal baseline (i.e., the controls), the comparison made is always between the controls and treatments.


### • Evaluating results from an external baseline allows for better comparisons across studies with regards to assay and/or lab performances

• BCS 4:3 Template 2010 • September 2012 Page 5STARTFINISH

# Lower Incidence or Severity of Hypertrophy than Controls

• Thyroid activity increases during metamorphosis and then decreases after metamorphic climax


### • Thyroid histology in the AMA is typically performed on tadpoles during the stages in which increased thyroid activity is occurring


### • Thyroid antagonist activity would result in a developmental delay and/or greater hypertrophy incidence and severity compared to controls


### • ... unless the tadpoles have passed through metamorphic climax in which case this could be suggestive of development delay


### • This issue illustrates the need for stage matched controls

• BCS 4:3 Template 2010 • September 2012 Page 6

# Stage Matching with Controls

• Using stage
- matched tadpoles in histological analysis is important


### • Stage is a confounding factor for statistical analyses of all endpoints, except for developmental delay


### • An alternative experimental design, would be to sample each individual as they reach a certain stage (e.g., NF58)

• BCS 4:3 Template 2010 • September 2012 Page 7STARTFINISH

# Thank you!
#### § 4.1133 Sequence and timing of discovery.

Unless the administrative law judge upon motion, for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interests of justice, orders otherwise, methods of discovery may be used in any sequence and the fact that a party is conducting discovery, whether by deposition or otherwise, shall not operate to delay any other party's discovery.
March 16, 2011
Equipment Price Forecasting: Notes and Errata

This document contains information providing clarification of and correcting e rrors to documents posted on the Supplemental Information and Data website (http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_sta ndards/supplemental_info_equipment_price_foreca sting.html)

1. Correction to originally posted data: the orig inal version of “Using the Experience Curve Approach for Appliance Price Forecasting” has been replaced with a new version that corrects an error in Figure 2 (p. 4). Specifically, the original figure erroneously showed the learning rate for computers as less than 0.1. This has been corrected to show the calculated value of 0.51.

2. Update to originally posted data: the original version of the “Producer Price Index Data for Relevant Products” Excel sheet has been replaced with a new version that includes data for computers and compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs).

3. Example of calculation results from the National Im pact Analysis spreadsheets before and after application of the Equipment Price Forecasting method:

Based upon initial feedback received by DOE, some users have experienced difficulty in enabling the macros in the National Impact Analysis spreadsh eets. In order to ensure that all users have an opportunity to observe and compare the results from the two models, DOE is providing an example from one case. Listed below are the results for Product Class 3 (Refrigerator-Freezers) at Trial Standard Level (TSL) 5, with and without application of Equipment Price Forecasting.

N ational Impact Summary
Refrigerator/Freezer (Product Class 3)
(Reference, 7% discount rate) With EPF Without EPF

Energy Savings Undiscounted (Cumulative to 2043) 3.066 3.066
Discounted Incremental Equipment Cost 18.243 23.085
Discounted Operating Cost Savings 13.700 13.700

N et Present Value -4.543 -9.385As is demonstrated in the table, the Energy Savings and Operating Cost Savings do not change with application of Equipment Price Forecasting, but the Equipment Cost does.

4. Clarification on data in posted documents: DOE h as received questions indicating that there may be confusion about differences between the histori cal data series in the Federal Register notice (Table 1) and the regression results in the “Usi ng the Experience Curve Approach for Appliance Price Forecasting” paper (Figure B-2 for Refrige rators, and Figure B-3 for Freezers). As a point of clarification, the data in the documents were derived from different sources. The regression lines in the paper were based solely on PPI data . The data in the Federal Register notice were derived from a combination of Consumer Price I ndex (CPI) data and Producer Price Index (PPI) data to obtain a longer data series for the rulemaking than was possible using PPI alone. The National Impact Analysis (NIA) spreadsheets poste d on the website use the CPI/PPI data from the Federal Register notice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-14-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-05-1997
<CASH>                                         113,725
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,126
<PP&E>                                         430,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,127,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,833
<BONDS>                                        735,945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           713
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,073,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,127,835
<SALES>                                        165,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               344,186
<CGS>                                           61,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 91,654
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,199
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,650
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>