alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 249I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0901 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 249I |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 63ό έτος29 Ιουλίου 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0901

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 249I

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

63ό έτος29 Ιουλίου 2020

---

| Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Πληροφορίες |
| | ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΘΕΣΜΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΛΟΙΠΑ ΟΡΓΑΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ |
| | Συμβούλιο |
| 2020/C 249 I/01 | Έγκριση τροποποιήσεων του εσωτερικού κανονισμού της Eurojust | 1 |

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

IV   Πληροφορίες

ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΘΕΣΜΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΛΟΙΠΑ ΟΡΓΑΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ

Συμβούλιο

2020/C 249 I/01

Έγκριση τροποποιήσεων του εσωτερικού κανονισμού της Eurojust

1

---

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

IV Πληροφορίες

ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΘΕΣΜΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΛΟΙΠΑ ΟΡΓΑΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ

Συμβούλιο

| 29.7.2020 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CI 249/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2020

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CI 249/1

---

Έγκριση τροποποιήσεων του εσωτερικού κανονισμού της Eurojust

(2020/C 249 I/01)

Το συλλογικό όργανο της Eurojust ενέκρινε στις 24 Ιουλίου 2020 τροποποιήσεις του εσωτερικού κανονισμού της Eurojust (1). Οι εν λόγω τροποποιήσεις επισυνάπτονται στην εκτελεστική απόφαση (ΕΕ) 2020/1114 του Συμβουλίου, της 23ης Ιουλίου 2020 (2).

Για το Συλλογικό Όργανο της Eurojust,

Ladislav HAMRAN

Πρόεδρος της Eurojust

---

(1)  Εγκρίθηκε από το Συμβούλιο με την εκτελεστική απόφαση (ΕΕ) 2019/2250, της 19ης Δεκεμβρίου 2019 (ΕΕ L 336 της 30.12.2019, σ. 309) και εγκρίθηκε από το Σώμα των Επιτρόπων στις 20 Δεκεμβρίου 2019 (ΕΕ L 50 της 24.2.2020, σ. 1).

1

(2)  ΕΕ L 244 της 29.7.2020, σ. 13

2

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jonathan Uribe v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00265-CR

Trial court case number: 2013CR5298

Trial court: 290th District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the abovereferenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 1400 (1967). Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting access to a 

copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief. 

See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

We grant the motion and order the trial court clerk, no later than 10 days from 

the date of this order, to provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the 

reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the appellant. The trial court clerk 

shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, the date upon 

which delivery of the record to the appellant is made. 

Finally, appellant’s request for an extension of time within which to file a response 

to counsel’s Anders brief, requesting an extension to 30 days from the granting of his 

motion, is granted. Appellant’s response to his appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed 

within 30 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 4, 2015
§ 4.1383 Hearing. ( a ) If a hearing is requested, the administrative law judge shall convene the hearing within 90 days of receipt of responses under § 4.1382(b). The 90-day deadline for convening the hearing may be waived for a definite time by the written agreement of all parties, filed with the administrative law judge, or may be extended by the administrative law judge, in response to a motion setting forth good cause to do so, if no other party is prejudiced by the extension.
( b ) The administrative law judge shall give notice of the hearing at least 10 days in advance of the date of the hearing.
492.70966
#### § 3509.11 Under what conditions will BLM issue a future interest lease to me?

When it is in the public interest, we will issue you a future interest lease for lands where you either have an existing mining operation or have established that a valuable deposit exists.
# AMERICAN AIRLINES

January 11, 2010

**VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS :** 

Dorothy Beard Chief, Docket Branch Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Joint Applicants’ Confidential Answer to DOJ’s Comments, American/British Airways/Iberia/ Finnair/Royal Jordanian Antitrust Immunity,

DOT-OST-2008-0252

Dear Ms. Beard:

The Joint Applicants hereby submit the confidential version of their January 11, 2010 Answer to DOJ’s Comments. We request
confidential treatment of this document in accordance with the Joint Applicants’ Rule 12 motion of August 14, 2008, which we incorporate herein by reference.

Respectfully submitted,

CARL B. NELSON, JR. PAUL C. JASINSKI Associate General Counsel General Counsel, Americas

R. BRUCE WARK JAMES B. BLANEY Associate General Counsel Senior Counsel, Americas JEFFREY A. OGAR British Airways plc Senior Attorney American Airlines, Inc. DARYL A. LIBOW
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

ROGER W. FONES DON H. HAINBACH Morrison & Foerster LLP Garafalo Goerlich Hainbach PC ANDREW B. STEINBERG Attorneys for British Airways
Jones Day Attorneys for American AirlinesWILLIAM KARAS SAMI SARELIUS CAROL GOSAIN Vice President & General Counsel Steptoe & Johnson LLP Finnair Oyj Attorneys for Iberia

MICHAEL J. HOLLAND Condon & Forsyth LLP Attorneys for Royal Jordanian

Attachment
cc: Service list
### §715f. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–42, §8, June 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 93, which provided for governance of the Tribe by an Interim Council until the adoption of a new tribal constitution and bylaws, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 99.1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based
on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in note 1(l) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP



|                 
|-----------------
|Norfolk, Virginia
|March 1, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 144

 151

 159

 161

 161

 160

 156

 156

 146

 150

 155

 158

 164

 169

 167

 177

 191

 187

 179

 190

 190

 199

 193

 194

 194

 192

 174

 182

 200

 205

 201

 141

 144

 151

 157

 156

 153

 148

 147

 142

 143

 148

 152

 157

 159

 160

 157

 178

 178

 176

 178

 186

 188

 188

 189

 187

 173

 166

 171

 179

 198

 187

 143

 147

 155

 159

 158

 155

 151

 152

 144

 146

 151

 155

 160

 163

 163

 165

 186

 183

 177

 185

 187

 194

 190

 191

 190

 181

 170

 177

 191

 202

 194

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 12, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,198.54

 1,198.52

 1,198.50

 1,198.47

 1,198.20

 1,198.15

 1,198.13

 1,198.11

 1,198.07

 1,198.02

 1,198.04

 1,198.26

 1,198.39

 1,198.31

 1,198.25

 1,198.38

 1,198.31

 1,198.43

 1,198.39

 1,198.31

 1,198.24

 1,198.36

 1,198.28

 1,198.19

 1,198.37

 1,198.36

 1,198.48

 1,198.42

 205.8

 205.7

 205.7

 205.6

 204.8

 204.7

 204.6

 204.5

 204.4

 204.3

 204.3

 205.0

 205.4

 205.1

 204.9

 205.3

 205.1

 205.5

 205.4

 205.1

 204.9

 205.3

 205.0

 204.8

 205.3

 205.3

 205.6

 205.4

STORAGE

-0.2

-0.1

-0.1

-0.1

-0.8

-0.1

-0.1

-0.1

-0.1

-0.1

+0.1

+0.6

+0.4

-0.2

-0.2

+0.4

-0.2

+0.4

-0.1

-0.2

-0.2

+0.4

-0.2

-0.3

+0.5

+0.0

+0.4

-0.2

CHANGE

257

255

259

242

259

209

252

250

223

206

312

607

476

163

194

478

180

730

224

163

179

461

168

150

554

269

462

194

INFLOW

 154

 80

 80

 80

 456

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 349

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 83

 80

 80

 80

PP

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 202

 202

 202

 202

 202

 203

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

 201

OUTLETS

 5

 3

 7

 4

 2

 0

 2

 0

 2

 0

 2

 0

 3

 2

 3

 5

 4

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 6

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

C.F.S.

 .06

 .04

 .08

 .05

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .03

 .02

 .04

 .06

 .05

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .07

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .02

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2013 WHISKEYTOWN LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAP.

C.F.S. * FRANCIS

COMPUTED

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -0.4 8,376 5,621 0 2,962 76 .87

ACRE-FEET -0.4 16,614 11,149 0 5,875 151

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 5,875

SPILL 0 17,024

 206.0

OUTLET 11,149

TOTAL

JUDGE

CARR PP

(1)

 15

 15

 15

 11

 8

 8

 8

 18

 20

 20

 120

 393

 319

 10

 10

 319

 10

 564

 10

 10

 11

 320

 3

 3

 405

 158

 350

 16

 3,169

 6,286

FROM

TO

SPRING CR.

TO CLEAR CR.

CLEAR

CR.

NATURAL

FLOW

 242

 240

 244

 231

 251

 201

 244

 232

 203

 186

 192

 214

 157

 153

 184

 159

 170

 166

 214

 153

 168

 141

 165

 147

 149

 111

 112

 178

 5,207

 10,328

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .23

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .55

PRECIP

INCHES

PRECIPITATION

 .55

 32.30

THIS MONTH

JULY 1, 2012 TO DATE

Table 5
#### § 3000.41 Severability.

If a court holds any section or its paragraphs of the regulations in parts 3000 through 3180 or their applicability to any person or circumstance invalid, the remainder of these rules and their applicability to other persons or circumstances will not be affected.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD, S.P. LOGAN

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

OTIS Q. MOTON, JR.

LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400340

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 4 June 2014.

Military Judge: CDR K. Gerrity, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Headquarters and 

Service Battalion, Marine Corps Base, Quantico, VA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: Maj T.H. Campbell, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Maj Michael D. Berry, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq.

23 December 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSatellite servicing economic studyPrevious studies have shown that satellite servicing is cost effective; however, all of these studies were of different formats, dollar year, learning rates, availability, etc. Threfore, it was difficult to correlate any useful trends from these studies. The reviewed study was initiated to correlate the economic data into a common data base, using a common set of assumptions. A selected set of existed funded programs was then analyzed to provide an independent analysis of the servicing options and potential economic benefits.Document ID19910009850Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:184113NASA-CR-184113Accession Number91N19163Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-38142Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009850.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3932.30 Terms and conditions of a modified lease. ( a ) The terms and conditions of a lease modified under this subpart will be made consistent with the laws, regulations, and land use plans applicable at the time the lands are added by the modification.
( b ) The royalty rate for the lands in the modification is the same as for the lease.
( c ) Before the BLM will approve a lease modification, the lessee must file a written acceptance of the conditions in the modified lease and a written consent of the surety under the bond covering the original lease as modified. The lessee must also submit evidence that the bond has been amended to cover the modified lease and pay BLM processing costs.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn assessment of finite-element modeling techniques for thick-solid/thin-shell joints analysisThe subject of finite-element modeling has long been of critical importance to the practicing designer/analyst who is often faced with obtaining an accurate and cost-effective structural analysis of a particular design. Typically, these two goals are in conflict. The purpose is to discuss the topic of finite-element modeling for solid/shell connections (joints) which are significant for the practicing modeler. Several approaches are currently in use, but frequently various assumptions restrict their use. Such techniques currently used in practical applications were tested, especially to see which technique is the most ideally suited for the computer aided design (CAD) environment. Some basic thoughts regarding each technique are also discussed. As a consequence, some suggestions based on the results are given to lead reliable results in geometrically complex joints where the deformation and stress behavior are complicated.Document ID19940011061Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMin, J. B.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Androlake, S. G.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1993Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-108426NAS 1.15:108426Accession Number94N15534Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19940011061.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4834 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4834

To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2022

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
  Kennedy, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Cruz, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Grassley, and Mrs. 
  Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Resources, Officers, and 
Technology to Eradicate Cyber Threats to Our Children Act of 2022'' or 
the ``PROTECT Our Children Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 107(a)(10) of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 (34 
U.S.C. 21117(a)(10)) is amended by striking ``2022'' and inserting 
``2024''.
                                 <all>
```
- CtrExh1SutterReport: Contractor Specific, Sutter Exhibit 1, Article
### PART III—TAX ON MAKING FIREARMS

Sec.
5821.
Making tax.
5822.
Making.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part III consisted of section 5821, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 90–618, title II, §201, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1227.

A prior part IV consisted of section 5831, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 90–618, title II, §201, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1227.
#### § 3141.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to provide for the competitive leasing of lands and issuance of combined hydrocarbon leases, oil and gas leases, or tar sand leases within special tar sand areas.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                           110
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                  1,296     
<ALLOWANCES>                     108       
<INVENTORY>                        0         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               1,881     
<PP&E>                         1,387     
<DEPRECIATION>                   855       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 2,413     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          1,392     
<BONDS>                            0         
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0         
<PREFERRED>                    1,307     
<COMMON>                      10,427    
<OTHER-SE>                   (10,713)   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   2,413     
<SALES>                        1,801     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               1,801     
<CGS>                              0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  1,891     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   7         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 7         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (97)      
<INCOME-TAX>                       0         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (97)      
<DISCONTINUED>                     0         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0         
<CHANGES>                          0         
<NET-INCOME>                     (97)       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (0.03)     
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (0.03)     
        


</TABLE>
Docket Number FAA - 2013 - 0623
Sacramento

River

13

24

18

19

12

7

T11N R2E T11N R3E

Y O L O C O Y O L O C O

S U T T E R C O S U T T E R C O

32.5 R

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

Contract No. 14-06-200-939A-2-R-1

Exhibit B

Driver, Gregory E.

725-202-26

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.25 0.5

Miles

Date: November 1, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\driver_gregory\driver_gregory.mxd
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Commerce Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas Stallings, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




By: /s/ Thomas J. Stallings
   ----------------------------------
     Thomas J. Stallings
     Chief Executive Officer
     December 15, 2004