alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 632

 652

 687

 690

 695

 640

 647

 621

 672

 728

 739

 753

 756

 766

 794

 789

 800

 796

 808

 814

 820

 806

 847

 859

 859

 855

 848

 0

 0

 0

 613

 620

 652

 672

 625

 570

 565

 598

 625

 674

 717

 731

 727

 747

 758

 756

 777

 775

 785

 775

 787

 782

 792

 813

 822

 824

 807

 0

 0

 0

 623

 634

 668

 682

 676

 601

 612

 607

 653

 704

 730

 744

 744

 756

 775

 772

 790

 785

 795

 797

 805

 794

 809

 836

 833

 839

 822

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 15,295

 14,715

 14,131

 14,138

 14,133

 14,175

 14,202

 14,243

 14,253

 14,277

 14,316

 14,389

 14,481

 14,589

 14,716

 14,804

 14,924

 15,229

 15,595

 15,990

 16,374

 16,796

 17,239

 17,696

 18,135

 18,569

 18,974

 19,325

 19,625

 19,886

 510

 491

 471

 471

 471

 473

 473

 475

 475

 476

 477

 480

 483

 486

 491

 493

 497

 508

 520

 533

 546

 560

 575

 590

 605

 619

 632

 644

 654

 663

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### **Subchapter D—Industrial Use of Distilled Spirits**

Sec.
5271.
Permits.
5272.
Bonds.
5273.
Sale, use, and recovery of denatured distilled spirits.
5274.
Applicability of other laws.
5275.
Records and reports.
5276.
Occupational tax. 1

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter D, Rectifying Plants, consisted of part I, Establishment, and part II, Operation, and comprised sections 5271 to 5275 and 5281 to 5285, respectively, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

#### Amendments

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10512(e)(2), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–449, added item 5276.

1  Section repealed by Pub. L. 109–59 without corresponding amendment of subchapter analysis.
§ 3283.3 How will the unit operator know the status of a unit contraction revision request? BLM will notify the unit operator in writing of our decision. If we approve the request, we: ( a ) Will specify the term of the contraction extension and/or which lands will remain in the unit agreement;
( b ) May require the unit operator to update the informational requirements of subpart 3282; and
( c ) May terminate the participating area contraction revision if we find termination is necessary in the public interest.
-,.) s.~ ..‘‘ t~.’J, LJLUA LU’) .20’).) £¶L’,IUI’~AL LIAiZ,UIV -~-• CU1~hLSfU~\L) CUkW. 4~JVU2,’uu~

TAK~~ U

— United States Department ofthe Interior Thi~I~’I~

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

Washington. fl.C. 20240 — U

W-6400 MAY l ~ 1993

Memorandum

To: Regional Director P?, MP, LC, UC, GP

From: Acting Commissioner (sgd.) Lawrence F. Hancock

Subject: Policy for Terms of Contracts

Long-term contracts have generally been negotiated for the

maximum term permitted by the authority under which each contract

was executed. To better protect the interests of the United

States while still adequately meeting the needs of water users,

and to provide more operational flexibility and improved project

efficiency, effective immediately, the maximum term for new or

renewed long—term contracts executed pursuant to Reclamation law

shall be 25 years. An exception may be granted by the

Commissioner if a strong justification can be provided. You are

encouraged to negotiate: even shorter terms when practical and

advantageous to the United States. This policy shall apply to

all long—term contracts except where the law under which the

contract is executed explicitly requires a term longer than 25

years.

Secretary Babbitt has publicly announced that the Central Valley

Project’Improvement Act, Title 34 of Public Law 102-575 (Act),

infuses market principles and environmental values into the water

contracting process and that it will serve as a vehicle for

reform throughout the Bureau. Section 3404 of the Act clearly

indicates that 25 years will be the upper limit for long—term

repayment and water service contracts in the Central Valley

Project. This policy, together with reforms in water pricing

will encourage water conservation and negate the need for

amortization periods of 40 yearS or longer.

Please insert this memorandum in section II of the looseleaf book

“Policy Instructions for Repayment, Water Service, and Other

Contracts” sent to you by our memorandum of February 26, 1980.

bc: Solicitor

Associate Solicitor, Energy and Resources

AS/WS (Rieke)

H—bOO (Beard), W—6400(2), W—6500, W—6600

D—5000

WBR:WBERG: ds:05/03/93: 208—5205

Revised:LMauro: 05/11/93 :208—5007

H:\HOME\WBERG\DOC\CONTER1’I (Policy Book, Contract Term)

I~4 R~rLY ~IFERTO:
### PART II—TAX TREATMENT BY PATRONS OF PATRONAGE DIVIDENDS AND PER-UNIT RETAIN ALLOCATIONS

Sec.
1385.
Amounts includible in patron's gross income.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–834, §17(a), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 1048, added heading of part II and item 1385.
#### Moncel Realty Corporation, Respondent, v. Whitestone Farms, Inc., Appellant.

The right to maintain a common-law action to recover the reasonable value of the use and occupation of real property was not suspended by the enactment of the emergency rent laws. The only limitation imposed upon such actions by the emergency legislation is that the amount of the recovery must be determined in accordance with the provisions of the emergency rent laws. This action may be treated as a proceeding to fix the emergency rent. Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Present —- Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., concurs in the result.
Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss Pumping

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily Total Daily Total

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CFS In Acre Feet

Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss (4.33) Loss (4.33) Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3,638 2,617 6,255 7,216 5,191 12,407

2-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3,610 2,612 6,222 7,161 5,181 12,342

3-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3,625 2,626 6,251 7,191 5,208 12,399

4-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3,902 2,621 6,523 7,740 5,198 12,938

5-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2,552 3,478 6,030 5,062 6,899 11,961

6-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3,305 3,480 6,784 6,555 6,902 13,457

7-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2,981 3,555 6,535 5,912 7,051 12,963

8-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2,979 3,597 6,576 5,908 7,135 13,043

9-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2,535 2,636 5,171 5,028 5,228 10,256

10-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3,133 2,629 5,762 6,214 5,215 11,429

11-Feb-20 0 0 4 0 4 0 12 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 8 0 1,453 2,645 4,098 2,882 5,246 8,128

12-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 808 1,845 2,653 1,603 3,659 5,262

13-Feb-20 0 0 4 0 4 0 16 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 11 0 1,632 879 2,512 3,238 1,744 4,982

14-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1,747 876 2,624 3,466 1,738 5,204

15-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1,232 876 2,107 2,443 1,737 4,180

16-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1,620 876 2,496 3,213 1,738 4,951

17-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1,684 877 2,561 3,340 1,739 5,079

18-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1,697 875 2,572 3,366 1,735 5,101

19-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1,044 878 1,922 2,071 1,741 3,812

20-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 338 877 1,216 671 1,740 2,411

21-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 4 4 0 7 7

22-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 277 870 1,147 550 1,725 2,275

23-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 597 873 1,470 1,184 1,732 2,916

24-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1,025 871 1,896 2,033 1,727 3,760

25-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 822 870 1,691 1,630 1,725 3,355

26-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 2,122 869 2,991 4,209 1,723 5,932

27-Feb-20 0 0 4 0 4 0 20 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 13 0 1,924 870 2,795 3,817 1,726 5,543

28-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 2,583 876 3,459 5,123 1,737 6,860

29-Feb-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 302 875 1,177 599 1,735 2,334

Total 0 0 12 0 12 0 20 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 13 0 55,168 48,330 103,497 109,425 95,862 205,287

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

FEBRUARY 2020

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined
#### § 3595.2 Abandonment of underground workings.

No underground workings or part thereof shall be permanently abandoned and rendered inaccessible without the advance, written approval of the authorized officer.
| Name of Subsidiary                          | State of Incorporation | Ownership (%)          |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------|------------------------|
| Global Universal Film Group, Inc.           | Nevada                 | 100%                   |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Universal Entertainment, Inc.        | Nevada                 | 100%                   |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Universal Pictures, Inc.             | Canada                 | 30%                    |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Renaissance Funding, LLC.            | Nevada                 | 100% (Managing Member) |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Film Partners I, LLC.                | Florida                | 100% (Managing Member) |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Universal Film Finance, LLC.         | Louisiana              | 100% (Managing Member) |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Universal Film Productions, LLC.     | Louisiana              | 100% (Managing Member) |
|                                        |                   |                   |
| Global Universal Mavericks in Toyland, LLC. | Louisiana              | 100% (Managing Member) |
§ 3900.40 Multiple use development of leased or licensed lands. ( a ) The granting of an exploration license or lease for the exploration, development, or production of deposits of oil shale does not preclude the BLM from issuing other exploration licenses or leases for the same lands for deposits of other minerals. Each exploration license or lease reserves the right to allow any other uses or to allow disposal of the leased lands if it does not unreasonably interfere with the exploration and mining operations of the lessee. The lessee or the licensee must make all reasonable efforts to avoid interference with other such authorized uses.
( b ) Subsequent lessee or licensee will be required to conduct operations in a manner that will not interfere with the established rights of existing lessees or licensees.
( c ) When the BLM issues an oil shale lease, it will cancel all oil shale exploration licenses for the leased lands.
### §662. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–507, §4, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 861, which related to payment of shares to heirs of deceased enrollees and persons under twenty-one years of age or otherwise under legal disability and provided that funds distributed under former sections 659 to 663 of this title would not be subject to Federal or State income taxes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22191]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MORRIS K. UDALL SCHOLARSHIP AND EXCELLENCE IN NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL 
POLICY FOUNDATION

Committee Management; Notice of Renewal

AGENCY: U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution, Morris K. 
Udall Foundation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2; 20 U.S.C. 5601-5609.
SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with section 9(a) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Public Law 92-463). The 
executive director of the Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in 
National Environmental Policy Foundation has determined that the 
renewal of the National ECR Advisory Committee is necessary and in the 
public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed 
upon the U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution (U.S. 
Institute) by 20 U.S.C. 5601 et seq. This determination follows 
consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration.
    Name of Committee: National ECR Advisory Committee.
    Purpose and Objective: The committee will provide advice to the 
director of the U.S. Institute and to the Board of Trustees of the 
Morris K. Udall Foundation regarding future program directions, 
including the U.S. Institute's role in connection with the 
implementation of Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4331).
    Balanced Membership Plan: The committee will consist of a maximum 
of 30 members representing a balanced cross-section of viewpoints 
concerning environmental issues and the field of environmental conflict 
resolution. Among the interests represented will be environmental 
advocates, resource users, affected communities, state and/or local 
governments, tribes, federal environmental and resource management 
agencies, the conflict resolution and legal communities, and academic 
institutions.
    Duration: The committee's duration began October 2, 2002, and is 
being renewed through April 30, 2005.
    Responsible Officials: The designated federal officer is Dr. Kirk 
Emerson, director of the U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict 
Resolution, 130 S. Scott Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701, telephone 520 670-
5299.

    Dated: September 27, 2004.
Ellen K. Wheeler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-22191 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-FN-P
```
#### § 3603.20 Reclamation.
### §139A. Federal subsidies for prescription drug plans

Gross income shall not include any special subsidy payment received under section 1860D–22 of the Social Security Act.

(Added Pub. L. 108–173, title XII, §1202(a), Dec. 8, 2003, 117 Stat. 2480; amended Pub. L. 111–148, title IX, §9012(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 868.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1860D–22 of the Social Security Act, referred to in text, is classified to section 1395w–132 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–148 struck out second sentence which read as follows: "This section shall not be taken into account for purposes of determining whether any deduction is allowable with respect to any cost taken into account in determining such payment."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Pub. L. 111–148, title IX, §9012(b), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 868, as amended by Pub. L. 111–152, title I, §1407, Mar. 30, 2010, 124 Stat. 1067, provided that: "The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012."

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to taxable years ending after Dec. 8, 2003, see section 1202(d) of Pub. L. 108–173, set out as an Effective Date of 2003 Amendment note under section 56 of this title.
### §602. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 9, 1946, ch. 933, §2, 60 Stat. 969, which related to applications for tribal membership by persons excluded from enrollment, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Kevin Robert WILLIAMS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Mr. ROBINSON, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-7539.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 23, 2006.

Decided: March 3, 2006.

Kevin Robert Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Robert Williams, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Charles C. Baker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of ZipRealty, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZipRealty, Inc.



By:

/s/    CHARLES C.
BAKERCharles C. BakerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 10, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided by ZipRealty, Inc. and will be retained by ZipRealty, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Mamie McCurrey, Appellee, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

*Insurance*— what *validates void policy.*Where a policy of insurance is absolutely void from the beginning, the company cannot claim the right to forfeit the premiums even though the policy specifically so provides; if it retains the premiums it validates such a policy.

*Assumpsit.*Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; *626tlie Hon. M. W. Thompson, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1911.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 15, 1912.

William E. Bach and Ealph B. Holmes, for appellant.

O. M. Jones and Walter J. Bookwalter, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Puterbaugh

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action in *assumpsit*upon a life insurance policy issued by the defendant to the husband of the plaintiff, in which she is named as beneficiary. To the declaration, which consists of one count, in which the policy is set out in *haec verba,*the defendant pleaded the general issue. Upon the trial the plaintiff introduced the policy, proofs of death, payment of the premiums, and a stipulation to the effect that after the death of the deceased, the plaintiff went to the office of the defendant and demanded the’ amount due upon the policy, whereupon the defendant denied all liability thereunder and refused to pay her anything. The defendant introduced in evidence a stipulation to the effect that the disease as the result of which the insured died was a serious one, — one affecting sound health, and which affected the sound health of the insured at the time of the delivery of the policy.

The evidence shows the policy was issued February 14,1910, and the insured died December 24,1910. The proofs of death contain a statement by a physician that he had treated the insured for the disease of which he died, during the month of September, 1909, prior to the date of the policy. The policy contained the following provisions: “This policy is void if the insured before its date has been attended by a physician for any serious disease.” “If this policy is or shall become void all premiums paid shall be forfeited to the company.” It is contended by the de*627fendant that the policy in question was void *ab initio,*and further, that it was not compelled to return the premiums, thereby placing the parties *in statu quo,*or in the alternative retain such premiums, thereby ratifying the insurance to the full amount. We understand the law to be that where a policy of insurance is absolutely void from the beginning, the company cannot claim the right to forfeit the premiums. In such case no premiums are earned for the reason that at no time has the company assumed any risk. Dickerson v. Ins. Co., 200 Ill. 270. See also, Ins. Co. v. Schroyer, 95 N. E. 1004 (Indiana). Applying such rule to the case at bar it must he held that by retaining the premiums paid, the defendant ratified the otherwise void contract and is liable thereunder.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
### PART I—GALLONAGE TAXES

Subpart
A.
Distilled spirits.
[B.
Repealed.]
C.
Wines.
D.
Beer.
E.
General provisions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1979**—Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(b)(1), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 290, struck out item relating to subpart B "Rectification".