alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOptimal Chebyshev polynomials on ellipses in the complex planeThe design of iterative schemes for sparse matrix computations often leads to constrained polynomial approximation problems on sets in the complex plane. For the case of ellipses, we introduce a new class of complex polynomials which are in general very good approximations to the best polynomials and even optimal in most cases.Document ID19920002504Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsFischer, Bernd*(Research Inst. for Advanced Computer Science Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Freund, Roland*(Wuerzburg Univ. Germany, F.R. , United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1989Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberRIACS-TR-89-5NAS 1.26:188836NASA-CR-188836Accession Number92N11722Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-387Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920002504.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Decision Document: Cost Recovery 

Improvement, Central Valley Project

Purpose of Paper

To document revised Ratesetting practices for improving the recovery of Central 

Valley Project (CVP) construction costs on an annual basis per the 

recommendation of the Office of the Inspector General in their Evaluation Report 

dated March 26, 2013. 

Office of the Inspector General Concerns

1. A sufficient share of the CVP federal investment is not being recovered on 

an annual basis.

2. Steady progress toward repayment of the CVP federal investment is not 

being made.

Revised Practice for Operation and Maintenance (O&M) 

Cost Recovery

Estimating O&M Cost

There will be no change to the process currently in place. 

Estimating Acre-feet to Set O&M Water Rates

A 7-year average of historical deliveries will be used as the new basis for setting 

O&M water rates. Past Ratesetting practice has used a 5 year average of 

historical deliveries, which has not sufficiently recovered annual O&M costs. 

The 7-year average represents several years of deliveries that provide a good

hydrological basis to provide a good representative average for the upcoming year 

without being too extreme with wet or dry periods. This average is also 

responsive to environmental, legislative, and operational conditions that can affect 

deliveries to water users. 

Additionally, the 7-year average of historical deliveries will be further reduced 

based on lower than normal August reservoir levels as follows:

1. No adjustment if August 31 reservoir level is equal or greater than 100% 

of average

1 March 20, 2015
2. 10% adjustment to reduce delivery estimate if between 81% and 99% of 

average.

3. 20% adjustment to reduce delivery estimate if equal to or less than 80% of 

average.

Revised Practice for Construction Cost Recovery

Distribution of Construction Costs

A 7-year average of historical deliveries will be used as the new basis for 

projecting future deliveries for the purpose of distributing construction costs 

among contractors. In the past, the projected deliveries that were used to 

distribute costs was based on OCAP data that may not be representative for 

certain contractors within certain regions. 

Estimated Acre-feet to Set Construction Water Rates

A 7-year average of historical deliveries will also be used as the new basis for 

projecting deliveries for the purpose of setting water rates. In the past, the 

projected deliveries that were used to set the water rates were based on an average 

of actual deliveries from 1995 to the present. 

Monitoring Process

The use of the 7-year average of historical deliveries as described for O&M and 

construction will be monitored to assure that the revised Ratesetting practices are 

working as intended.

Effective Date

Starting with the 2016 CVP water rates.

March 20, 2015 2
#### Cohen *v.*Beall.

September 23, 1910.

Action for mopey had and received. Before Judge Seabrook. Washington superior court. March 3, 1909.

*Wright & Hyman,*for plaintiff.

*Hines & Jordan*and *R. L. Gamble,*for defendant.

Per Curiam.

This ease came before this court upon, a writ of error; and the same being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Justices Lumpkin, Beck, and Holden being in favor of a reversal, and Chief Justice Eish, Presiding Justice Evans, and Justice Atkinson being- in favor of an affirmative, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court below stand affirmed by ' operation of law.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22520]



[[Page 59928]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a 
Non-Vessel- Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel- Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicants:
    AS-AV Uluslararasi Nakliyat Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, Mehmet Akif 
Caddesi 1. Sok. No: 23 Sirinevler, Istanbul, 34180, Turkey. Officers: 
Mehmet Yavuz Kankavi, Director of Overseas Opera. (Qualifying 
Individual), Melek Karabacak, President.
    Newport Logistics, Inc., 171 Erick Street, Unit Y1, Crystal Lake, 
IL 60014. Officer: Michael Chung, President (Qualifying Individual).
    Waterline Pakistan (PVT) Ltd., Ground Floor, 4-A, Kehkashan Town 
Houses, Block 5, Clifton, Karachi-75600--Pakistan. Officers: Capt. 
Ghulam Mustafa, Partner, Capt. Asaf Hayat, Officer (Qualifying 
Individuals).

Non-Vessel- Operating Common Carrier Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants:
    Jauser Cargo Corporation, 5589 NW., 72nd Avenue, Miami, FL 33166. 
Officers: Gabriel Terra, Director (Qualifying Individual), Jorge Sere 
Ferber, President.
    Fun N' Stuff International USA, Inc., dba Air Ocean Land Transport 
Logistics Inc., 13169 Alta Vista Way, Sylmar, CA 91342. Officers: Nash 
D. Asandas, President (Qualifying Individual), Carmencita Hernandez-
Asandas, CFO.
    Global Shipping Services, LLC, 200 Route 22 East, Hillside, NJ 
07205. Officer: Morten Olesen, President (Qualifying Individual).
    Asiapac Forwarding & Supply Chain Management dba Baobao Shipping, 
4210 Solar Circle, Union City, CA 94587, Hidayat I. Shaikh, Sole 
Proprietor.
    VIN Worldwide Transport, LLC dba Vinship Lines, Woodbridge Plaza, 
485 Route 1, Building B, Suite 310--3rd Floor, Iselin, NJ 08830. 
Officer: Martin Joakim Aranha, President (Qualifying Individual).
    SW Logistics Inc., 1330 Broadway, Suite 1052, Oakland, CA 94612. 
Officer: Sung Wook Lee, President (Qualifying Individual).

Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicant:
Commonwealth Travel & Shipping, 9560 Skillman Road, Suite 100, Dallas, 
TX 75243. Officer: Victor K. Oyeujo, Sr., Manager (Qualifying 
Individual).

    Dated: October 1, 2004.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-22520 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
### [Subpart B—Repealed]
#### Rogerson Cold Storage, Appellant, v. Roy Parmalee, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action in an action in conversion.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
United States Department of the Interior

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

2800 Cottage Way

Sacramento, CA 95825-1898

MP-3400

2.2.4.22

To: All Central Valley Project Water Contractors 

Subject: Rate methodology for Extending Repayment on Reimbursable Extraordinary Operation 

& Maintenance (XM) Costs on Reserved Works in accordance with the Omnibus 

Public Lands Management Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-11) for the Central Valley Project

(CVP) and Computing a Replacement (R) Component for Excess Capacity Charges in 

the CVP.

Dear Water Contractor:

Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner approved the basis of negation to extend repayment for 

XM cost and recovery of those costs through rates in accordance with the CVP Irrigation and 

M&I Ratesetting Policies and PEC 05-03. 

Additionally, in accordance with PEC 05-10 & PEC 05-11, region has received approval from 

Commissioner to develop and charge (R) component for Non-Project Use of Excess Capacity

(Warren Act) in Reclamation Projects. 

CGB Financial Management Division, Ratesetting Branch is holding two technical workshops to 

explore methods of XM rate and (R) Component for Excess Capacity Charges in the CVP. In 

order to be transparent and to continue our commitment to excellent customer service we will be 

sending meeting invitations for your valuable participation. Initially, there will be two virtual 

meetings on these subjects.

For computing Replacement (R) Component for Excess Capacity Charges in the CVP, a meeting 

will take place on July 8th from 10am to noon.

For development of new XM rate methodology, a meeting will be held on July 22nd from 10am 

to noon. 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Travis Hawkins at 

thawkins@usbr.gov/916-978-5356, or Mr. Sabir Ahmad at sahmad@usbr.gov. For TTY access 

call the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

Sincerely,

Ann Lubas-Williams

Financial Manager
2 

WBR:SAhmad:ALubasWilliams: 

P:\MP-3400 Secretary\Correspondence\Letters-3400\xxxxxxxxxxxdocx

CC: Area offices, CGB-400, NCCAO, SCCAO, CCAO, NCAO
No. 98-11411 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11411 Summary Calendar

JERRY HAROLD BROSEH,

Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS

GARY L. JOHNSON, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:98-CV-079-C

- - - - - - - - - - March 27, 2000

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jerry Harold Broseh, Texas prisoner # 438 382, was granted a

certificate of appealability to appeal the issue whether Broseh’s

delay in receiving a copy of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act of 1996 ( AEDPA) constituted a state impediment or

warranted equitable tolling of the on e-year limitations period.

Relying upon this court’s decision in Fisher v. Johnson , 174 F.3d

710 (5th Cir. 1999), Broseh argues that t his lengthy delay

constitutes a rare and exceptional circumstance warrantingNo. 98-11411 -2-

equitable tolling. Broseh does not renew his claim that the delay

constituted a State impediment which wou ld toll the limitations

period. Accordingly, that issue is waived. S ee Yohey v. Collins

,

985 F.2d 222, 224- 25 (5th Cir. 1993)(arguments not briefed on

appeal are deemed abandoned); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a).

In a recent opinion, this court determined that a prisoner’s

actual ignorance of the AEDPA’s limitations period, e ven if

attributable to the newly-enacted statute’s complete unavailability

to inmates, can never serve as a basis for equitable tolling.

Felder v. Johnson
,

___ F.3d

___ (5th Cir. Feb. 9, 2000, No. 98-

21050), 2000 WL 144178 at *3-*5. Broseh’s equitable tolling

argument is thus foreclosed by Felder . Accordingly, the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Broseh’s motion to file a rebuttal brief is DENIED AS MOOT

because he filed a reply brief. To the extent that Broseh has

moved to strike the appellee’s brief as untimely, that request is

DENIED. Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(4) (legal holidays include any “day

declared a holiday by the

. . . state in which is located

. . . the

d istrict court that rendered the challenged judgment or order”);

Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 662.003(a)(6) (declaring the Friday after

Thanksgiving as a holiday).

AFFIRMED. MOTION TO STRIKE BRIEF DENIED; MOTION TO FILE

REBUTTAL BRIEF DENIED AS MOOT.
### §543. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 552, §3, 53 Stat. 1253, which related to liability of judgment funds for debts, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-09-00525- CV In re David M. Haines
ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Waldrop and He nson Filed: Mar ch 2, 2010
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Harry F. Wilson, Plaintiff in Error.

*Dbam-shops*— what *proof essential to conviction for. maintaining saloon in anti-saloon territory.*To warrant a verdict of guilty in such case it is essential that the People prove heyond a reasonable doubt that the act complained of *took*place in an anti-saloon territory or district.

Error to the County Court of Champaign *county;*the Hon. W. *G.*Spurgin, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1911.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 15, 1912.

F. T. Carson, for plaintiff in error.

F. A. Coggeshall, for defendant in error; O. B. Dobbins, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Puterbaugh

delivered the opinion of-the court.

Under an information filed October 28, 1910, charging the plaintiff in error with having maintained a nuisance, by keeping a place where intoxicating liquor was sold, in anti-saloon territory, he was found guilty by a jury in the County Court and sentenced to pay a *638fine of fifty dollars, to be committed to the county jail for a period of twenty days, and to enter into bonds that he would not thereafter permit the sale of intoxicating liquors upon the premises where he was found guilty of having maintained such nuisance. While the evidence fully warranted the jury in finding that the defendant had, within eighteen months prior to the filing of the information, sold intoxicating liquors upon the premises described in the information, it failed to establish that the place where the said nuisance was maintained was anti-saloon territory. The only attempt to show such fact was the introduction in evidence by the People, of a paper purporting to be a certificate of the town clerk of the town of Champaign, showing the result of a town election purporting to have been held on the 5th day of April, 1910, where the proposition “Shall this town continue to be anti-saloon territory?” was submitted; that 1661 votes were cast in the affirmative and 1304 in the negative.

To warrant a verdict of guilty it was essential that the People should prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that the act complained of took place in an anti-saloon territory or district. We do not think the proof made.was sufficient to establish such material allegation. It cannot be inferred from the mere fact ■that the question whether the town should remain anti-saloon territory was submitted to and answered in the affirmative by the voters, that the town theretofore had been declared to be anti-saloon territory.

For the reason stated, the judgment of the County Court must be reversed and the cause remanded.

*;Reversed cmd remanded.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-21969-CIV-WILLIAMS

JOHN ENRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

vs.

PRINCIPAL LIFE INS. CO.,

Defendant.

/

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’s Report 

and Recommendation regarding Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

(the “Report”) (DE 9). Neither Party filed objections to the Report. 

Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, it 

is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the conclusions in the Report (DE 9) are AFFIRMED 

AND ADOPTED. Defendant’s Motion (DE 6) is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that it 

seeks a transfer. The Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this action to the United States 

District Court for the District of Colorado, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), and CLOSE 

this case. All pending Motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 10th day of

September, 2020.

Case 1:20-cv-21969-KMW Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2020 Page 1 of 1
#### Janet D. Fieder et al., Appellants, v. Helen Terstiege et al., Respondents.

—‘In an action to restrain interference with appellants’ use and enjoyment of certain land designated as *“*park ” and “ beach ” on a filed map, to which map appellants’ deeds make reference, judgment in favor of defendants, dismissing the complaint on the merits, after trial by the court without a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Herbert T. Price for Admission to Practice as an Attorney. (From the State of Illinois.)

Present ■—■ Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johiiston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.,
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements (No. 333-84304) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-64346, No. 333-134583, and No. 333-139968) on Form S-8 of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2007, with respect tothe consolidated balance sheet of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in thetwo-year period ended December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Our report refers to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*, on January 1, 2006. 

/s/ KPMG LLP
Attachment A-2. School Principal Email

Dear [High School Principal],

REL Southwest would like to invite your school to participate in a research study examining 

changes in the mathematics course requirements for high school graduation being 

implemented under Texas House Bill 5 (the Foundation High School Program). 

The study will investigate whether providing the parents of students entering grade 9 during 

the 2014-15 school year with information about the changes to the mathematics course 

requirements and how they compare to the admissions requirements for most four-year, public 

universities and colleges in Texas. 

Who is eligible to participate?

We are looking for high schools that are willing to mail informational materials describing the 

changes to the high school graduation mathematics requirements to parents of students

entering grade 9 during the 2014-15 school year. Materials will be distributed during the early 

spring of 2015 and 2016.

How will the study be conducted?

The study will be conducted as a randomized controlled trial. At the beginning of the study, 

one-half of the participating high schools will be randomly assigned to receive study materials 

and asked to distribute these materials during the spring of 2015 and 2016. The remaining high 

schools will conduct business-as-usual during this time period but will receive study materials at 

the conclusion of the study, if desired. 

What are the study materials and how will they be distributed?

The study materials will consist of information brochures—provided in English and Spanish—to 

be mailed to students’ homes. Schools randomly assigned to receive study materials will 

receive a box of prepaid, pre-stuffed envelopes containing the informational brochures, and 

they will be asked to print and adhere mailing labels containing student addresses to the 

envelopes and place them in the U.S. Mail. REL Southwest will reimburse schools up to $150 to 

cover the cost of staff time and address label printing materials. Schools will not be asked to 

provide any student data to REL Southwest. 

How will you benefit?

Participating schools will receive informational brochures describing the new mathematics 

requirements being implemented under the new Foundation High School Program graduation 
plans and how they compare to the admissions requirements for most four-year, public 

universities and colleges in Texas to distribute to parents. The brochures will be available in 

English and Spanish. 

How can I receive more information or sign up for the study?

For more information or to participate in the study, contact Deborah Van Kummer at (512) 391-

6551 or deborah.vankummer@sedl.org.
### §4181. Imposition of tax

There is hereby imposed upon the sale by the manufacturer, producer, or importer of the following articles a tax equivalent to the specified percent of the price for which so sold:

#### Articles taxable at 10 percent—

Pistols.

Revolvers.

#### Articles taxable at 11 percent—

Firearms (other than pistols and revolvers).

Shells, and cartridges.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 490.)