alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(c)
                          PRESS RELEASE


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WEDNESDAY
JULY 23, 1997

CONTACT PERSON:         STACY DUCKETT, VICE PRESIDENT
                        CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS
                        (501) 688-8229

AND                     GLENN HOM
                        (714) 547-6383


           TCBY ANNOUNCES SALE OF CARLIN MANUFACTURING
                      TO COMPANY PRESIDENT

LITTLE  ROCK,  AR  -  Wednesday  (July  23,  1997)  -   TCBY
ENTERPRISES, INC. (NYSE:TBY) today announced the sale of its
subsidiary, Carlin Manufacturing--an international leader in
mobile  foodservice  solutions--to  Carlin  President  Ralph
Goldbeck, who  seeks  to redirect  the  company's  corporate
strategy toward the most profitable foodservice segments.

"When TCBY originally announced its intent to divest  Carlin
to concentrate on its core business, I knew the  opportunity
was perfect  for  Carlin as  well,"  said Goldbeck.    "This
company can now do the  same by channeling resources  toward
what we do best, building and designing mobile kitchens  for
the foodservice industry."

Prior to  the  acquisition, Carlin  also  built  foodservice
kiosks and customized specialty vehicles for communications,
retail and medical applications.

Goldbeck was named vice president of Carlin Manufacturing in
1986 and later took over as president in 1993.  The  company
attracted many  high-profile clients  under his  leadership,
with projects  such  as  the Oscar  Mayer  Weinermobile  and
Burger King Mobile Kitchens.

Since then, Carlin has  established a strong reputation  for
quality and  dependability, with  vehicles operating  in  28
countries worldwide.    Recent accounts  have  included  the
successful Motorola FoodWorks Mobile Kitchens and the Golden
Gate Bridge Cafe in San Francisco, Calif.

"Strategic decisions made and implemented by the company  in
1996 included the  sale of Carlin,"  said TCBY Chairman  and
CEO Frank D. Hickingbotham.   "While we certainly intend  to
remain a customer, we  determined that Carlin would  operate
most successfully as its own company."

TCBY  Enterprises,  Inc.,   through  subsidiary   companies,
manufactures and sells  soft serve  frozen yogurt,  hardpack
frozen  yogurt,  hardpack  ice  cream,  and  frozen  novelty
products, and markets foodservice equipment.  The Company is
the  world's  largest   manufacturer-franchisor  of   frozen
yogurt.    The   Company,  through  subsidiaries,   develops
locations and products under the TCBY"(Registered) and Juice
Works(Registered) brands.

                               -30-
### §4195. Limitations on amount of guarantees

#### (a) Aggregate fiscal year limitation

Notwithstanding any other provision of law and subject only to the absence of qualified applicants or proposed activities and to the authority provided in this subchapter, to the extent approved or provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary may enter into commitments to guarantee notes and obligations under this subchapter with an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $400,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2013.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations for credit subsidy

There are authorized to be appropriated to cover the costs (as such term is defined in section 661a of title 2) of guarantees under this subchapter such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2013.

#### (c) Aggregate outstanding limitation

The total amount of outstanding obligations guaranteed on a cumulative basis by the Secretary pursuant to this subchapter shall not at any time exceed $2,000,000,000 or such higher amount as may be authorized to be appropriated for this subchapter for any fiscal year.

#### (d) Fiscal year limitations on tribes

The Secretary shall monitor the use of guarantees under this subchapter by Indian tribes. If the Secretary finds that 50 percent of the aggregate guarantee authority under subsection (c) has been committed, the Secretary may—

(1) impose limitations on the amount of guarantees any one Indian tribe may receive in any fiscal year of $50,000,000; or

(2) request the enactment of legislation increasing the aggregate outstanding limitation on guarantees under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title VI, §605, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4047; Pub. L. 107–292, §2(b), Nov. 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 2053; Pub. L. 110–411, title VII, §701(b), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4334.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 110–411 substituted "2009 through 2013" for "1997 through 2007".

2002—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 107–292 substituted "1997 through 2007" for "1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 26, 1996, see section 606 of Pub. L. 104–330, set out as a note under section 4191 of this title.
### PART II—PARTNERSHIP ADJUSTMENTS

Sec.
6225.
Partnership adjustment by Secretary.
6226.
Alternative to payment of imputed underpayment by partnership.
6227.
Administrative adjustment request by partnership.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title II, §206(p)(10), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1183, amended part II heading generally, reenacting heading without change.
§ 3509.47 What information must I include in my application for a fractional interest prospecting permit or lease? Your application must include all the same information we require when you apply for a regular competitive Federal lease. See subpart 3508 of this part. In addition, you must include the following: ( a ) A land description;
( b ) Your certification that you meet the qualifications requirements (see subpart 3502 of this part);
( c ) Evidence of your title or the extent of your rights in the mineral deposits. Submit either a certified abstract of title, a title certificate or the instrument establishing your rights; and
( d ) The names of the other owners, if any, of the mineral interests. If you own the operating rights to the mineral by means of a contract with the mineral owner, you also need to submit three copies of the mineral contract or lease.
#### § 3425.0-2 Objective.

The objective of this subpart is to provide an application process through which the Department may consider holding lease sales apart from the competitive leasing process set out in §§ 3420.3 through 3420.5-2 of this title, where an emergency need for unleased coal deposits is demonstrated, or in areas outside coal production regions or outside eastern activity planning areas.

[44 FR 42615, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33141, July 30, 1982]
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Stratigraphy and structure of part of the western Sierra 
Nevada metamorphic belt, California

#### Professional Paper 410

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                 
  (13677 pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                 
    (2643 pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                 
    (3799 pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                 
    (5826 pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                 
    (3424 pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                 
    (4030 pdf)
- **Plate 6**                                 
    (1975 pdf)
- **Plate 7**                                 
    (3193 pdf)
- **Plate 8**                                 
    (2023 pdf)
- **Plate 9**                                 
    (682 pdf)
- **Plate 10**                                 
    (1170 pdf)
- **Plate 11**                                 
    (657 pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp410 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:06:02
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 678

 681

 680

 698

 705

 711

 671

 674

 644

 659

 650

 633

 593

 595

 600

 597

 557

 577

 586

 592

 599

 573

 512

 575

 608

 577

 536

 505

 582

 640

 647

 640

 633

 646

 626

 646

 622

 630

 552

 565

 566

 593

 544

 544

 538

 539

 509

 513

 504

 541

 542

 561

 473

 449

 510

 515

 476

 477

 466

 482

 571

 582

 652

 655

 666

 660

 676

 662

 650

 613

 600

 614

 625

 589

 571

 555

 567

 541

 534

 531

 562

 565

 579

 513

 482

 541

 563

 524

 511

 487

 529

 605

 618

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 13, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 20,419

 20,460

 20,499

 20,509

 20,488

 20,478

 20,464

 20,406

 20,356

 20,341

 20,285

 20,142

 19,995

 19,818

 19,701

 19,611

 19,481

 19,319

 19,153

 18,975

 18,815

 18,587

 18,383

 18,259

 18,139

 17,951

 17,761

 17,562

 17,425

 17,422

 17,388

 681

 682

 683

 684

 683

 683

 682

 680

 679

 678

 676

 671

 667

 661

 657

 654

 649

 644

 638

 633

 627

 620

 613

 609

 605

 598

 592

 585

 581

 581

 580

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### Allen W. Field et al. v. Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Company et al.

Filed September 20, 1905.

No. 13,908.

Case Followed. For the reasons set forth in *Field v. Nebraska Telephone Co., ante,*p. 419, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Edward P. Holmes, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Allen W. Field*and *Tibbets & Anderson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Halleelo F. Bose*and *J. L. Caldwell, contra.*

Oldham, C.

This is a companion case to *Field v. Nebraska Telephone Co., ante,*p. 419, and involves the identical question on the settlement of a bill of exceptions from the *424county board of equalization therein determined. The causes were argued together, and for the reasons set forth therein, we recommend that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Ames and Letton, CO., concur.

By the Court: For the reasons given in *Field v. Nebraska Telephone Co., ante,*p. 419, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
### PART III—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec.
7470.
Administration.
7470A.
Judicial conference.
7471.
Employees.
7472.
Expenditures.
7473.
Disposition of fees.
7474.
Fee for transcript of record.
7475.
Practice fee.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2015**—Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title IV, §432(c), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3126, added items 7470 and 7470A.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1018(u)(45), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3592, added item 7475.
Docket No: FAA- 201- 201 2-0 503 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-032-AD Originating Office Tracking No.: Disposition Comments

Next Step: 

### k8J FRAN 

## 0 SNPRM 

## D These comments are in response to an SNPRM



### D No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received -lfthis box is checked, no signatures are required. No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes , list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously publishedNPRMwill require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focalpoint for guidance
.
Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue
. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all ofthe issues from one commenter together. Ifchanges to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend
. Reference FAA- IR-M-8040.1 C Chapter 9. ISSUE 1: Select one of thefollowing : other lf

other , explain: Interpretation of magnetic plug/Chip detector (Magnetic plug) Commenter(s): Fred C. Wittlake What change to the AD action is requested? Require the 1 0 hour inspection interval for the nonelectric magnetic plug. Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? The wording ofthis proposed AD in paragraph (d)(l) indicates that "magnetic plug/chip detector" will thereafter be written as "magnetic plug", and subparagraphs (i), (ii), and (iii) follow that definition. Paragraph (d)(2) follows with a 10 hour inspection interval for the "magnetic plug", which now includes "magnetic plug/chip detector" by definition ofprevious paragraph. The 10 hour inspection ofthe magnetic plug should not apply to the "electrical chip detector". Do we agree? Yes IfYES, we agree because the word magnetic plug/chip detector though may mean magnetic plug (non-electrical chip detector) , but is confusing
. FAA will change AD wording from " magnetic plug/chip detector to " magnetic plug" by deleting " /chip detector". Make the following changes to the AD: Delete "/chip detector" from the word "magnetic plug/chip detector" in paragraph (d)(l) and in page 4. IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: IfNO , we don't agree because

Page 1 of3ISSUE 2: Select one of thefollowing: 

### If

other, explain: Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? Do we agree? If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If NO, we don't agree because

For additional issues, double-click here

Page 2 

### of3Signature Section Signature indicates concurrence with this action
. Originating Office Tracking No .:

ASE



### Page 3 of3 

# z-s .T<.) 6 L--o;-z-- Date
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                              Date: October 1, 2004

                        Commission File Number 001-12510

                                  ROYAL AHOLD
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

               Albert Heijnweg 1, 1507 EH Zaandam, The Netherlands
               ---------------------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                      Form 20-F  X           Form 40-F
                                ---                    ---

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to
the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

                             Yes              No  X
                                 ---             ---

         If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
82-________.
<PAGE>

     On October 1, 2004, Koninklijke Ahold N.V. ("Royal Ahold" or the "Company")
issued a press release announcing that Andrew Parkinson has been named as
President of its wholly-owned subsidiary Peapod.
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                             KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V.

                             /s/ H.R. Ryopponen
                             -----------------------------
Date: October 4, 2004        By:    H.R. Ryopponen
                             Title: Executive Vice President and CFO

                                       3
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibit has been filed as part of this Form 6-K:

Exhibit   Description
-------   -----------

99.1      Royal Ahold press release dated October 1, 2004, announcing that
          Andrew Parkinson has been named as President of the Company's
          wholly-owned subsidiary Peapod.

                                       4
#### § 2650.4-3 Administration.

Leases, contracts, permits, rights-of-way, or easements granted prior to the issuance of any conveyance under this authority shall continue to be administered by the State of Alaska or by the United States after the conveyance has been issued, unless the responsible agency waives administration. Where the responsible agency is an agency of the Department of the Interior, administration shall be waived when the conveyance covers all the land embraced within a lease, contract, permit, right-of-way, or easement, unless there is a finding by the Secretary that the interest of the United States requires continuation of the administration by the United States. In the latter event, the Secretary shall not renegotiate or modify any lease, contract, right-of-way or easement, or waive any right or benefit belonging to the grantee until he has notified the grantee and allowed him an opportunity to present his views.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles C. Baker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Annual Report of ZipRealty, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZipRealty, Inc.



By:

/S/    CHARLES C. BAKERCharles C. BakerExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer


Date: March 13, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by ZipRealty, Inc. and will be retained by ZipRealty, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 10, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 10, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0354. TONYA D. EDWARDS v. DWAIN K. LANIER. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: SUCV2021001147
### PART II—CERTAIN CONTROLLED CORPORATIONS

Sec.
1561.
Limitation on accumulated earnings credit in the case of certain controlled corporations.
[1562.
Repealed.]
1563.
Definitions and special rules.
[1564.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13001(b)(6)(B), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2098, which directed amendment of the table of sections for part II of subchapter B of chapter 5 by substituting "Limitation on accumulated earnings credit in the case of certain controlled corporations" for "Limitations on certain multiple tax benefits in the case of certain controlled corporations" in item 1561, was executed to the table of sections for part II of subchapter B of this chapter to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(b)(12), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–522, struck out item 1564 "Transitional rules in the case of certain controlled corporations".

**1969**—Pub. L. 91–172, title IV, §401(a)(3), (b)(2)(E), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 600, 602, substituted "Sec. 1561. Limitations on certain multiple tax benefits in the case of certain controlled corporations." for "Sec. 1561. Surtax exemptions in case of certain controlled corporations.", and struck out item 1562, effective with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1974, and added item 1564.

**1964**—Pub. L. 88–272, title II, §235(a), Feb. 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 116, added designation of part II, and items 1561 to 1563.
**Article 3(c)(1)**

That for the quantity of Base Supply diverted in excess of the monthly quantity shown in Exhibit A during any month in which Term 91 is in effect, the Contractor shall be charged a fee equal to the sum of the storage operation and maintenance rate and the storage capital rate components of the Project ratesetting policy.  In those months in which Term 91 is in effect for less than the entire month, the fee shall be computed on a pro rata basis.

**Article 3(c)(2)**

Any changes to the written schedule for any of the upcoming months of the Year shall be subject to the prior written approval of the Contracting Officer.

**Article 1(q)**

“Term 91” shall mean that standard term included in water right permits issued by the California State Water Resources Board (SWRCB) established by Decision 1594 and identified as Term 91, as may be modified or revised by the SWRCB.