alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 04-33]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/OPS-ADMIN, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 04-33 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: September 27, 2004.

L. M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 59209)          ( print page 59210)          ( print page 59211)          ( print page 59212)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 04-22175  Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4838 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the rate for allowances 

based on mileage for beneficiary travel, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2022 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. CRAMER, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. 

TILLIS, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. ROUNDS, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

rate for allowances based on mileage for beneficiary travel, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Medical Mile5 age Adjustment Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4838 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN RATE FOR ALLOWANCES BASED ON 

2 MILEAGE FOR BENEFICIARY TRAVEL. 

3 Section 111(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

4 amended, in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘41.5 cents’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘45.5 cents’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# Page_1

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

# Page_2

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_3

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_4

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_5

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_6

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_7

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_8

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_9

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_10

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

Create .pdf File

# Page_11

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_12

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_13

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

Create .pdf File

# Page_14

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_15

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_16

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_17

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_18

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_19

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_20

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_21

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_22

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_23

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_24

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

# Page_25

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

# Page_26

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

Print Page

# Page_27

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File

Print Page

# Page_28

Schedule A-13Page &P of &N

Create .pdf File
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 2015

No. 04-11-00771-CR

Rene Daniel VILLARREAL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2111

Honorable Mark R. Luitjen, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of June, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit
99.3









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Provident Energy Trust (the “Trust”) on
Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Thomas W. Buchanan,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Provident Energy Ltd., who performs the
same function for the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Trust.







Date:
              March
      19, 2009


____/s/ Thomas W.
      Buchanan____Thomas
      W. BuchananPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
##### 



May 14, 2004 VIA EDGAR
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549  Re:
    Segue Software, Inc. Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Ladies and Gentlemen: In connection with the quarterly report of Segue Software, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Joseph K. Krivickas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
hereby certify that: 1. the Companys Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall
not be deemed a part of the Report or filed for any purpose whatsoever nor
shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. Sincerely,/s/ JOSEPH K. KRIVICKASJoseph K. KrivickasChief Executive Officer
### PART II—OPERATIONS

Sec.
5361.
Bonded wine cellar operations.
5362.
Removals of wine from bonded wine cellars.
5363.
Taxpaid wine bottling house operations.
5364.
Wine imported in bulk.
5365.
Segregation of operations.
5366.
Supervision.
5367.
Records.
5368.
Gauging and marking.
5369.
Inventories.
5370.
Losses.
5371.
Insurance coverage, etc.
5372.
Sampling.
5373.
Wine spirits.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part II consisted of sections 5361 to 5373 of this title, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

#### Amendments

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title XIV, §1422(b), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1050, added item 5364.

**1979**—Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(b)(7), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 290, struck out item 5364 "Standard wine premises".

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1905(b)(5), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1822, substituted "and marking" for ", marking, and stamping" in item 5368.
#### § 4.1043 What are the methods for testifying?

Oral examination of a witness in a hearing, including on cross-examination or redirect, must be conducted under oath with an opportunity for all parties to question the witness. The witness must testify in the presence of the ALJ unless the ALJ authorizes the witness to testify by telephonic conference call. The ALJ may issue a subpoena under § 4.1035 directing a witness to testify by telephonic conference call.
San Mateo, CA
                                                                 May 15, 2000
                                                                 $250,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal  sum of two  hundred  and  fifty  thousand  dollars  ($250,000),  with
interest  from the date hereof at a rate of ten percent  (10%) per annum,  which
amount shall be secured by all of the assets of Borrower.  Said principal  shall
be due and  payable on demand by Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,
but in no event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred  eighty (180)
days after the date of this Note.  This Note may be prepaid at any time  without
penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         2. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         3.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 15 day of May, 2000.

                                      Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                      By: __________________

                                      Title: ________________
APPENDIX H 

MINOR ROUTE VARIATION MAPS 
Non-Internet Public 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE 

PROPOSED SOUTHEAST EXPANSIONPROJECT 

Docket No. CP07-032-000 

Figure H-1 

Sheets 1-16 

Appendix H 

Minor Route Variations

Public access for this Non-Internet Public information is 

available only through the Public Reference Room, or by email at public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I, Paul R. Kimmel, Chief Financial Officer of MediCorLtd. (the “Registrant”), certify that:

1.             I havereviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant;

2.             Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             TheRegistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a)   Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated theeffectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in thisreport any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             TheRegistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Dated: September 28, 2006      |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| /s/ Paul R.  Kimmel            |   |
| Paul R. Kimmel,                |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer       |   |
| (Principal Financial  Officer) |   |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE 

STATE OF OREGON

PATRICIA SURFACE, ) Multnomah County Circuit Court

) Case no. 6909-07133

Plaintiff-Appellant, )

Petitioner on Review, )

)

and )

)

JAMES SURFACE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

Petitioner on Review, )

)

v. ) SC S45629

) CA A98377

AMERICAN SPIRIT INSURANCE )

COMPANIES/GREAT AMERICAN )

INSURANCE COMPANIES, )

)

Defendants-Respondents, ) ORDER AFFIRMING BY AN

Respondents on Review. ) EQUALLY DIVIDED COURT

Upon consideration by the court.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court.

Dated this 8th day of April 2003.

 

WALLACE P. CARSON, JR.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Van Hoomissen, J., retired December 31, 2000, and did not participate in the decision of

this case; Kulongoski, J., resigned June 14, 2001, and did not participate in the decision of

this case; Leeson, J., resigned January 31, 2003, and did not participate in the decision of

this case; De Muniz and Balmer, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of

this case.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1665 ELSIE B. CHURCH, widow of Sylvester Clark Church, Petitioner, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.

On Petition For Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (98-0046-BLA) Submitted: July 20, 2000 Decided: August 3, 2000Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elsie B. Church, Petitioner Pro Se. Christian P. Barber, Jennifer U. Toth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Elsie B. Church, widow of Sylvester Clark Church, seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). Our review ofthe record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Church v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs , BRB No. 99-601-BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7786** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
MICHAEL LAWRENCE BRANCH , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake , Chief District Judge. ( 1:05

- cr - 00016

- CCB

- 1; 1:10

- cv - 00079

- CCB )

Submitted : March 17, 2016 Decided: March 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Michael Lawrence Branch, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Lawrence Branch appeals the district court ’ s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment with respect to the denial of his previously filed 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We ha ve reviewed the record and
conclude that Branch’s motion was not a true Rule 60(b) motion,
but was, in substance , a successive § 2255 motion. See United
States v. McRae , 793 F.3d 392, 399

- 400 (4th Cir. 2005); see also Gonzalez v. Crosby , 545 U.S. 524, 531

- 32 (2005) (explaining how
to differentiate a true Rule 60(b) motion from an unauthorized successive habeas motion). Branch t herefore is not required to obtain a certificate of appealability to appeal the district

court ’ s order. McRae , 793 F.3d at 400. In the absence of prefiling authorization from this court, the district court lacked jurisdiction to hear Branch’s successive § 2255 motion.
See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3) (2012)

. Additionally, we construe Branch’s notice of appeal and
info rmal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003)

. In order to obtain authorization to file a
successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on
either: (1) newly discovered evidence that

. . . would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing3 evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to case s on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)

. Branch’s claims do not satisfy either of
these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a
successive § 2255 motion and affirm the district court ’ s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         7,832
<SECURITIES>                                   70,568
<RECEIVABLES>                                  34,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,413
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               82,198
<PP&E>                                         27,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                 8,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,007
<BONDS>                                        2,714
<COMMON>                                       395
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,932
<SALES>                                        34,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               38,464
<CGS>                                          6,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,292
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,896
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,396
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>