alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Department of the Interior 

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 

Interior Region 10 

2800 Cottage Way 

Sacramento, California 95825-1898 

IN REPLY REFER TO: 

CGB-3400 

2.2.4.22 

To: All Central Valley Project Water Contractors 

Subject: 2020 Central Valley Project (CVP) Water Rates 

Dear Water Contractor: 

The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) posted the final 2020 CVP water rates to the 

Reclamation website, https://www.usbr.gov/mp/cvpwaterrates/ratebooks/index .html. As 

included on the website Foreword for 2020, Reclamation used the following for estimating 

irrigation O&M water deliveries: 35% of contract entitlement (CE) for the majority of water 

service contracts; 75% of CE for Sacramento River Settlement contractors; and, the higher of the 

7-year average or 35% of CE for direct pumping contractors. 

Based on CVP current water allocation, it has been brought to our attention that irrigation water 

deliveries for 2020 will be lower than the deliveries used for the O&M water rate calculations. 

The lower than average water deliveries will result in an underestimated O&M component of the 

irrigation water rate. For the 2020 water year, the CVP-wide irrigation water rate for Water 

Marketing and Storage is calculated to be roughly $27.00 per acre-foot where the rate is expected 

to be in the $30.00 per acre-foot range based on the CVP water allocations. This difference 

results in a potential under collection of Water Marketing and Storage O&M based on current 

CVP water allocation of approximately 12%. 

The purpose of this letter is to notify water contractors of the underestimated 2020 water rate, 

and to provide advance notice of the potential for O&M deficits to occur when the 2020 Annual 

Contractor Accountings are calculated in August 2021. This letter is for informational purposes 

only. 

Additionally, it is encouraged that irrigation contractors consider the underestimated O&M rates 

when selling and transferring water to other water contractors to ensure that enough revenue is 

received to pay for the 2020 allocation of CVP O&M costs. 

INTERIOR REGION 10 • CALIFORNIA-GREAT BASIN 

CALIFORNIA", NEV ADA", OREGON" " PARTIAL 
If you have any questions, please contact Jesus Reynoso, Ratesetting Branch Manager, at 

jreynoso@usbr.gov, or (916) 978-5362. 

Sincerely, 

Digitally signed by JESUS JESUS REYNOSO 

Date: 2020.06.29 REYNOSO 15:52:08 -07'00' 

Acting For Ann Lubas-Williams 

Regional Financial Manager 

cc: CCAO (LBillingsley), COB 3400 (]Reynoso), CGB 3600 (SAhmad), CGB 110 

(MWilliams), NCAO 440 (RRobertson), SCCAO 100 (MJackson) 

INTERIOR REGION 10 • CALIFORNIA-GREAT BASIN 

CALIFORNIA .. , NEVADA .. , OREGON• • PARTIAL
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Commerce Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.
Michael Cassidy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ G. Michael Cassidy
--------------------------
G. Michael Cassidy
Chief Executive Officer
December 15, 2003
__... . .. _. . . . . . . ..- 

## OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN.

.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of General Motors Corporation (the
      "Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Sean
      Yaakov Fulda ,
      Principal Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.





By /s/
      Sean Yaakov Fulda




Sean
      Yaakov Fulda


Principal
      Executive Officer


November
      15, 2006
Fact Sheet February 17, 2004 

H-1B Petitions Filed and Approved by Type of Petition: FYs 2000-03 

Fiscal Year Total Initial Continuing 

Employment Employment 

Petitions Filed 

Petitions Approved 

2000 

2001 

2002 

2003 

2000 

2001 

2002 

2003 

299,046 164,814 134,232 

342,035 201,543 140,492 

215,190 109,576 105,614 

231,030 108,526 122,504 

257,640 136,787 120,853 

331,206 201,079 130,127 

197,537 103,584 93,953 

217,340 105,314 112,026 

• During FY 2003, the congressionally mandated cap of 195,000 beneficiaries was not 

reached. Nearly 78,000 individuals counted against the cap. The corresponding number 

for FY 2002 was 79,000. 

• Almost one-third of H-1B beneficiaries approved during FY 2002 were born in India. 

Other countries in the top five included, the People’s Republic of China (9-percent), 

Canada (6-percent), the Philippines (5-percent) and the United Kingdom (3-percent). 

• One third of the approved applications during FY 2002 were for aliens working as system 

analysts or programmers, down from half in 2001. The second largest category was 

occupations in higher education with 7-percent. 

• Median compensation for FY 2002 H-1B beneficiaries was $65,000 for continuing 

employment and $45,000 for initial. During FY 2001 those averages were $65,000 and 

$50,000 respectively. 

• Nearly 98-percent of all H-1B beneficiaries possess a bachelor’s degree or higher. Forty 

seven-percent hold at least a master’s degree. 

• Sixty-five percent of H-1B beneficiaries were between 25 and 34 years of age. 

– USCIS – 

On March 1, 2003, U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services became one of three legacy INS components to join the U.S. Department of 

Homeland Security. USCIS is charged with fundamentally transforming and improving the delivery of immigration and citizenship services, 

while enhancing the integrity of our nation's security.
Sacramento

River

T12N R1E T12N R2E

Tyndall Landing

YYOOLLOO CC OO

SSUUTTTTEE RR CC OO

25

13

30

18

24 19

7

29

17

20

8

26

14

23

12 11

35 36 31 32

45.6 L

44.2 L

46.45 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-2045A-R-1

Exhibit B

Windswept Land and Livestock Company

725-202-137

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 23, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\windswept_land_and_livestock_company\windswept_land_and_livestock_company.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07
- 22
- 00066
- CR
ZACHERY RENE LAMAS , A PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 242nd District Court

Hale County, Texas Trial Court No . B21040
- 1903 , Honorable Kregg Hukill , Presiding



### June 23 , 2022 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. Appellant Zachery Rene Lamas appeals his conviction for sexual a ssault of a child. 1 The appellate record was originally due March 28 , 2022

. The clerk ’ s record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter ’ s record was not. We subsequently granted the reporter, Brenda Rohrs , two extensions to file the reporter ’ s record due to her caseload

. By letter of May 16 , 2022 , we admonished Rohrs that failure to file the reporter ’ s record by June 1 6 w ould result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial

1 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 22.011(a)(2)

.2

court for further proceedings without further notice

. Rohrs has since requested a third extension to fi le the reporter’s record due to her caseload. We deny the request, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 35.3(c) ( “ The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. ” ); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring appellate courts to “ make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to preserve the parties ’ rights ” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand, the trial court shall determine the following: 1. what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter ’ s record; 2. why Rohrs has not completed the necessary tasks; 3. what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those tasks; and 4. whether Rohrs can complete the tasks within the time the trial court finds reasonable. Should the trial court determine that Ro h rs will require more than thirty days to complete, certify, and file the reporter ’ s record, it shall arrange for a substitut e reporter to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental clerk ’ s record and cause that record to be filed with this C o urt by July 25 , 2022

. It is so ordered. Per Curiam
Do not publish.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of MeriStar Hospitality
Operating Partnership, L.P.,
MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp., MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II and
MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III
(the Issuers) for the year ended December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Paul W. Whetsell, Chief Executive Officer of the Issuers, thereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and                 
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Issuers.

Date: March 31, 2003

| |                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ PAUL W. WHETSELL                            
| | Paul W. Whetsell                                
| | Chief Executive Officer                         
| | MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P.
| | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp.              
| | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II           
| | MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III          

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MeriStar
Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. and will be retained by
MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Anderson *v.*Sapp, and *vice versa.*

Fish, C. J.

1. The petition was to enjoin an impending trespass and to recover damages for acts already committed. The following verdict was returned: “We, the jui’y, find for plaintiff, and sixty-five dollars for timber cut.” This was a finding by the jury that the plaintiff was entitled to the writ of injunction as prayed, and damages in the stated amount. All the special assignments of error in the main bill of -exceptions relate to the.recovery of- damages; and as the plaintiff wrote off from the verdict the amount so recovered, the verdict will not be disturbed, there being sufficient evidence to show the plaintiff’s right to an injrtnction.

*205September 30, 1910.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Rawlings. Toombs superior court. January *27,*1909.

*Isaiah Beasley*and *Ilines*cG *Jordan,*for Anderson.

IF. *T. BurhhaUer,*contra.

2. Where a successful litigant voluntarily writes off a part of his recovery, he can not complain of the action of the court in requiring him to reduce his verdict as a condition of refusing a new trial. *Crawford*v. *Roney,*126 *Ga.*763 (55 S. E. 499); *Hamer*v. *White,*110 *Ga.*300 (34 S. E. 1001).

3. The approval by the judge of a brief of evidence, under an order allowing him to do so at the hearing of a motion for a new trial, and making provision for its subsequent filing, is the equivalent of an entry of filing upon the brief by the clerk. *Mitchell*v. *Masury,*132 *Ga.*361 (64 S. E. 275) ; *Malshy*V. *Young,*104 *Ga.*205 (30 S. E. 854). *Judgment on main and cross hills affirmed. All the Justices concur.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2


                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, William G. Filer II, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of EvergreenBancorp, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 18, 2004

/s/ William G. Filer II

William G. Filer II
Chief Financial Officer
| Name of Subsidiary                               | State of Incorporation | Ownership (%)               |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------------|
| Global      Universal Film Group, Inc.           | Nevada                 | 100%                        |
|                                             |                   |                        |
| Global      Universal Entertainment, Inc.        | Nevada                 | 100%                        |
|                                             |                   |                        |
| Global      Universal Pictures, Inc.             | Canada                 | 30%                         |
|                                             |                   |                        |
| Global      Film Partners I, LLC.                | Florida                | 100%      (Managing Member) |
|                                             |                   |                        |
| Global      Universal Film Finance, LLC.         | Louisiana              | 100%      (Managing Member) |
|                                             |                   |                        |
| Global      Universal Film Productions, LLC.     | Louisiana              | 100%      (Managing Member) |
|                                             |                   |                        |
| Global      Universal Mavericks in Toyland, LLC. | Louisiana              | 100%      (Managing Member) |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 419

 413

 418

 401

 387

 379

 368

 361

 366

 370

 358

 319

 315

 306

 301

 281

 296

 281

 312

 273

 281

 269

 244

 201

 182

 195

 182

 179

 177

 175

 194

 360

 377

 393

 360

 337

 339

 324

 318

 315

 313

 304

 279

 267

 262

 249

 250

 256

 246

 248

 250

 246

 217

 172

 156

 158

 161

 166

 143

 157

 162

 167

 391

 399

 403

 382

 361

 359

 347

 338

 335

 327

 326

 298

 299

 288

 277

 270

 269

 263

 264

 260

 260

 241

 202

 177

 170

 178

 172

 169

 167

 167

 175

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6326

TIMOTHY DONALD DINGLE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN OF LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. 

Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (9:19-cv-02426-JD)

Submitted: October 14, 2021 Decided: October 18, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Donald Dingle, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Donald Dingle seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be 

denied and advised Dingle that failure to file timely, specific objections to this 

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is 

necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the 

parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v. Duffy, 858 

F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985); see 

also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154-55 (1985). Although Dingle received proper notice 

and filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, he has waived 

appellate review because the objections were not specific to the particularized legal 

recommendations made by the magistrate judge. See Martin, 858 F.3d at 245 (holding 

that, “to preserve for appeal an issue in a magistrate judge’s report, a party must object to 

the finding or recommendation on that issue with sufficient specificity so as reasonably to 

alert the district court of the true ground for the objection” (internal quotation marks 

omitted)). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §900. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–197, §3(b), Dec. 22, 1973, 87 Stat. 770

Section, act June 17, 1954, ch. 303, §11, 68 Stat. 252, related to protection of minors, etc. by Secretary prior to transfer of tribal property.
### PART II—REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS

Sec.
856.
Definition of real estate investment trust.
857.
Taxation of real estate investment trusts and their beneficiaries.
858.
Dividends paid by real estate investment trust after close of taxable year.
859.
Adoption of annual accounting period.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–600, title III, §362(d)(7), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2852, substituted in item 859 "Adoption of annual accounting period" for "Deduction of deficiency dividends" and struck out item 860 "Adoption of annual accounting period".

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XVI, §§1601(a)(2), 1604(i)(2), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1745, 1752, added items 859 and 860.

**1960**—Pub. L. 86–779, §10(a), Sept. 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 1003, added part II analysis.