alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Buitoni Products, Inc., Appellant, against Thomas Nappi, as President of Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union of America, Local 102, et al., Respondents.

First Department,

May 10, 1949.

*216
      *Irving M. Radin, Joseph 8. Olerwager*and *Seymour D. Altmarlc*for appellant.

*Sigmund Goldstein*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

We find upon an examination of the record that there has been no arbitration of the dispute between the parties as contemplated by article XV of the contract.

An agreement to arbitrate a dispute entitles the parties to the considered judgment of the arbitrators based upon evidence and proofs adduced in the presence of all of the arbitrators. Although it is desirable to have all of the arbitrators meet, following final submission of the controversy, and participate in the deliberations so that the parties to the dispute may have the benefit of the effect the views and arguments of each arbitrator might have upon the others, the presence of all is not required *(Matter of American Eagle Fire Ins. Co.*v. *New Jersey Ins. Co.,*240 N. Y. 398). However, it is essential to the making of a valid award that all arbitrators be present at the hearings, and no proof may be received in the absence of any one of them *(Matter of Bullard*v. *Grace Co.,*240 N. Y. 388; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1456).

In the case at bar the parties agreed to submit their differences to an arbitration committee consisting of six members. Only three were present at the meeting of August 3, 1948, and as- a consequence the business transacted at the meeting could not be made the basis for the rendition of a valid award. The petitioner’s consent to, and participation in, the proceedings of August 3d, did not constitute a waiver of its rights under the contract, since the three arbitrators who were present at that meeting were not authorized to render an award or make a binding decision, but were limited to the making of recommendations. Récognition of their limited authority is evidenced by the wording of their alleged award of August 6, 1948, wherein the conclusions set forth are expressly referred to as “ recommendations ” and “ suggestions ”. Not having been vested with authority to resolve the controversy between the parties, their letter of August 6th is a nullity insofar as it purports to be a binding determination of the dispute. That being so, there could be no reopening of an arbitration hearing which had never taken place.

For the reasons assigned, the order appealed from should be reversed, with costs to the appellant and the motion granted.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion granted.
§ 2885.13 What rights does the United States retain? The United States retains and may exercise any rights the grant or TUP does not expressly convey to you. These include the United States' right to: ( a ) Access the lands covered by the grant or TUP at any time and enter any facility you construct on the right-of-way or TUP area. BLM will give you reasonable notice before it enters any facility on the right-of-way or TUP area;
( b ) Require common use of your right-of-way or TUP area, including subsurface and air space, and authorize use of the right-of-way or TUP area for compatible uses. You may not charge for the use of the lands made subject to such additional right-of-way grants;
( c ) Retain ownership of the resources of the land covered by the grant or TUP, including timber and vegetative or mineral materials and any other living or non-living resources. You have no right to use these resources, except as noted in § 2885.12 of this subpart;
( d ) Determine whether or not your grant is renewable; and
( e ) Change the terms and conditions of your grant or TUP as a result of changes in legislation, regulation, or as otherwise necessary to protect public health or safety or the environment.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 230

 232

 210

 210

 211

 198

 195

 196

 200

 199

 200

 202

 198

 199

 197

 196

 199

 204

 201

 197

 177

 184

 192

 192

 189

 193

 192

 190

 186

 188

 194

 191

 190

 188

 184

 190

 191

 191

 189

 185

 180

 179

 179

 183

 181

 183

 180

 174

 173

 175

 179

 178

 177

 176

 178

 174

 203

 203

 200

 198

 199

 192

 189

 192

 195

 195

 195

 194

 189

 186

 183

 190

 190

 190

 188

 182

 175

 179

 185

 186

 184

 185

 188

 182

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### § 3832.10 Procedures for locating mining claims or sites.
# Certification Permitting Rescission of Iraq as a Sponsor of Terrorism 

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                    On September 13, 1990, Acting Secretary of State Eagleburger designated Iraq as a state sponsor of terrorism (55                     *Fed. Reg.*                     37793-01).                 

                    Consistent with section 6(j)(4)(A) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, Public Law 96-72, as amended, and as continued in effect by Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 66                     *Fed. Reg.*                     44025, I hereby certify that:                 

Accordingly, the prerequisites for your determination to rescind Iraq's designation as a state sponsor of terrorism will be satisfied once you have transmitted this certification to the Congress.

This certification shall also satisfy the provisions of section 620A(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, Public Law 87-195, as amended, and section 40(f)(1)(A) of the Arms Export Control Act, Public Law 90-629, as amended.

                    You are authorized and directed to report this certification to the Congress and to arrange for its publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

[FR Doc. 04-22102

Billing code 4710-10-P
### **CHAPTER 2A—UNEARNED INCOME MEDICARE CONTRIBUTION**

Sec.
1411.
Imposition of tax.
§ 3934.30 License terminations. The BLM may terminate an exploration license if: ( a ) The BLM issued it in violation of any law or regulation, or if there are substantive factual errors, such as a lack of title;
( b ) The licensee does not comply with the terms and conditions of the exploration license; or
( c ) The licensee does not comply with the approved exploration plan.
§ 36.3 Preapplication. ( a ) Anyone interested in obtaining approval of a TUS is encouraged to establish early contact with each appropriate Federal agency so that filing procedures and details may be discussed, resource concerns and potential constraints may be identified, the proposal may be considered in agency planning, preapplication activities may be discussed and processing of an application may be tentatively scheduled.
( b ) Reasonable preapplication activities in areas shall be permitted following a determination by the appropriate Federal agency that the activities are necessary to obtain information for filing the SF 299, that the activities would not cause significant or permanent damage to the values for which the area was established or unreasonably interfere with other authorized uses or activities and that it would not significantly restrict subsistence uses. In areas administered by the NPS or the FWS, a permit shall be obtained from the appropriate agency prior to engaging in any preapplication activities. Prior to approval and issuance of such a permit, the appropriate Federal agencies must find that the proposed preapplication activity is compatible with the purposes for which the area was established.
### §794. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–281, §1(b)(1), May 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 246

Section, act Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 843, §4, 70 Stat. 893, restricted personal property rights upon publication of final membership roll.
#### Rock Island Butter Company, Respondent, v. James Rowland, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA search for energetic ion directivity in large solar flaresOne of the key observational questions for solar flare physics is: What is the number, the energy spectrum, and the angular distribution of flare accelerated ions? The standard method for deriving ion spectral shape employs the ratio of influences observed on the 4-7 MeV band to the narrow neutron capture line at 2.223 MeV. The 4-7 MeV band is dominated by the principal nuclear de-excitation lines from C-12 and O-16 which are generated in the low chromosphere by the direct excitation or spallation of nuclei by energetic ions. In contrast, the narrow 2.223 MeV line is produced by the capture of thermal neutrons on protons in the photosphere. These capture neutrons are generated by energetic ion interactions and thermalized by scattering in the solar atmosphere. In a series of papers, Ramaty, Lingenfelter, and their collaborators have calculated the expected ratio of fluence in the 4-7 MeV band to the 2.223 MeV line for a wide range of energetic ion spectral shapes (see, e.g. Hua and Lingenfelter 1987). Another technique for deriving ion spectral shapes and angular distributions uses the relative strength of the Compton tail associated with the 2.223 MeV neutron capture line (Vestrand 1988, 1990). This technique can independently constrain both the angular and the energy distribution of the energetic parent ions. The combination of this tail/line strength diagnostic with the line/(4-7) MeV fluence ratio can allow one to constrain both properties of the energetic ion distributions. The primary objective of our Solar Maximum Mission (SMM) guest investigator program was to study measurements of neutron capture line emission and prompt nuclear de-excitation for large flares detected by the Solar Maximum Mission/ Gamma-Ray Spectrometer (SMM/GRS) and to use these established line diagnostics to study the properties of flare accelerated ions.Document ID19940031486Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsVestrand, W. Thomas*(New Hampshire Univ. Durham, NH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1993Subject CategorySolar PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-196036NAS 1.26:196036Accession Number94N35993Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-2756Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19940031486.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-73482, No. 333-117695, No. 333-133227,No. 333-133305, No. 333-142187, No. 333-158523, and No. 333-161184) on Form S-8 and in the registration statement (No. 333-171309) on Form S-3 of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (the Company) of our reports datedMarch 10, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income(loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the related financial statement schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingas of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. Our report over the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2010 includes an explanatory paragraph stating that management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, the internal control overfinancial reporting of NF Investors, Inc., (Nursefinders), the parent company of Medfinders, Inc., associated with total net assets of approximately $52.1 million as of December 31, 2010 and total revenues of approximately $84.5 million for theyear ended December 31, 2010. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Nursefinders. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

San Diego, California 

March 10, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2017 (the Form 10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 20, 2017



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DAVID GLADSTONE    
|David Gladstone        
|Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 502.19

 502.02

 502.35

 502.15

 502.37

 502.58

 502.70

 502.65

 503.45

 503.16

 503.15

 503.74

 503.39

 503.47

 503.67

 504.02

 503.93

 503.84

 504.25

 504.32

 503.88

 503.24

 504.46

 505.07

 504.83

 504.82

 505.26

 503.07

 503.41

 504.79

 57,703

 57,512

 57,882

 57,658

 57,904

 58,140

 58,274

 58,218

 59,123

 58,792

 58,781

 59,454

 59,055

 59,146

 59,374

 59,773

 59,670

 59,568

 60,039

 60,120

 59,613

 58,884

 60,282

 60,989

 60,710

 60,699

 61,213

 58,690

 59,077

 60,664

STORAGE

-381

-191

+370

-224

+246

+236

+134

-56

+905

-331

-11

+673

-399

+91

+228

+399

-103

-102

+471

+81

-507

-729

+1,398

+707

-279

-11

+514

-2,523

+387

+1,587

CHANGE

1,285

1,353

1,557

1,135

1,466

1,474

1,455

1,456

2,057

1,471

1,637

1,847

1,348

1,844

1,992

2,036

1,784

1,780

1,967

1,626

1,407

1,490

2,572

3,080

2,586

2,705

2,958

1,410

2,850

3,471

INFLOW

 1,472

 1,441

 1,363

 1,239

 1,335

 1,351

 1,379

 1,477

 1,593

 1,628

 1,635

 1,499

 1,542

 1,788

 1,849

 1,833

 1,831

 1,827

 1,723

 1,581

 1,657

 1,849

 1,855

 1,863

 1,861

 1,854

 1,863

 1,860

 1,851

 1,855

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 21

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 706

 764

 770

 761

 731

 711

 724

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 145

 90

 75

 62

 74

 79

 80

OUTLET

 5

 8

 7

 9

 7

 4

 8

 7

 8

 10

 8

 9

 7

 10

 7

 2

 5

 4

 7

 4

 6

 9

 12

 10

 12

 12

 13

 17

 14

 12

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 05/24/2004

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +2,580 57,099 49,754 5,188 605 253

ACRE-FEET +2,580 113,256 98,687 10,290 1,200 502

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 98,687

SPILL 10,290 110,177

 58,084

OUTLET 1,200

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,235

 1,309

 1,505

 1,115

 1,413

 1,408

 1,303

 1,388

 1,951

 1,429

 1,557

 1,783

 1,316

 1,791

 1,918

 1,952

 1,719

 1,708

 1,902

 1,561

 1,342

 1,890

 3,178

 2,999

 2,475

 2,650

 2,885

 1,671

 3,209

 3,401

 56,963

 112,986

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

***Proposed Site*** Decem ber 2013


### PCE SOUTHEAST CONTAM INATION York, Nebraska
York County

 **Site Location :**  The PCE Southeast Contamination site includes the central and southeastern portions of the c ity of York, Nebraska, which

is an industrial/urban residential area, and the rural residential area just outside of the southeastern portion of city limits.

 **Site History:**

P reliminary Assessment and Site Inspection activities have been conducted at the site. The PCE Southeast Contamination site is a ground water plume

. The site is composed of documented releases of hazardous substances, mainly volatile organic compounds (VOC s ), into soils and ground water. There are many possible sources resulting from various operations such as dry c leaners, metal degreasing operations and grain storage facilities. To date, one municipal water supply well has been impacted and taken off line due to contamination. The plume has also impacted 3 private residential water supply wells, which have required alternate water.

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:** The ground water plume is comprised of chlorinated solvents, including but not limited to: tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE), and degradation products.

 **Potential Impacts on Surrounding C ommunity/Environment**  **:** The ground water plume extends approximately 2.0 miles . There are several private water supply wells and irrigation wells in danger of becoming contaminated because they are located down

- gradient of the ground water plume. Ground wate r is a precious natural resource that the State of Nebraska wants protected.

 **Response Activities (to date):** There is an ongoing removal action at PCE Southeast Contamination site to provide alternate water to impacted residences.

To date, the EPA has pr ovided alternate water to three residences at the request of the s tate of Nebraska

.

 **Need for NPL Listing:**

The s tate of Nebraska referred the site to the EPA because the site requires short

- term and long

- term response actions and listing will allow for a proper and timely investigation of the nature and extent of contamination and remediation of the site. Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable options at this time. Th e EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including gen eral information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs ca n be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.csc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1

- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sean Y.  Fulda,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer  of
UniverCell Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that:

-     the  Company's  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended  March  31,  2003,  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

-     the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company  for  the  periods  presented  therein.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

/S/  SEAN  Y.  FULDA
--------------------
Sean  Y.  Fulda
Chief  Executive  Officer  and
Chief  Financial  Officer
Date:  August  14,  2003



<PAGE>