alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 3134.1-1 Form of bond.

All bonds furnished by a lessee, operating rights owner (sublessee), or operator shall be on a form approved by the Director.

[46 FR 55497, Nov. 9, 1981, as amended at 53 FR 17358, May 16, 1988]
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Trust. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/ Brent C. Heagy                                                                                             |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Brent C. Heagy                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   |   | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Provident Energy Ltd.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**POWERLINX,
      INC.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of PowerLinx, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Tomlinson,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      PowerLinx, Inc. and will be retained by PowerLinx, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/
      Michael Tomlinson





Michael
      Tomlinson


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      17, 2006
#### § 3420.3 Activity planning: The leasing process.
#### James Clark *et al. v.*James Donaldson *et al.*

*Filed at Ottawa November 20, 1882.*

Chancery *jurisdiction—bill to remove nuisance.*A bill in chancery by property owners, seeking to have removed a building in a highway appurtenant and affording access to their property, and to enjoin the closing up of the highway, there being nothing about the building deleterious to the health of the complainants, or such as to render the use of their habitations uncomfortable or dangerous, it being simply inconvenient to have it occupy the street, shows no case for equitable relief.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle county; the Hon. Geo. W. Stipp, Judge, presiding.

Mr. B. F. Bull, and Messrs. Blanchard & Blanchard, for the appellants.

Messrs. Leland & Leland, for the appellees.

Mr. Justice Scholfield

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case, in our opinion, must be controlled by *Dunning*v. *City of Aurora et al.*40 Ill. 481. Bill is filed by certain property owners, praying that a building in a highway appurtenant and affording access to their property be removed, and that the closing up of such highway be enjoined. There *640is nothing about the building itself deleterious to the health of the complainants, or that renders the use of their habitations uncomfortable or dangerous,—it is simply inconvenient to have it occupy the street. Nor do we understand the case, as respects the existence of the highway, to be one beyond doubt.

The court said, in the case referred to: “The building having been erected, a court of equity would not, unless in an extreme case, interfere to remove the building. If it were a powder mill or magazine erected by an individual in the populous part of a city, or adjoining to the complainant, or so near to him as to endanger the lives of himself and family, or the destruction of his property, before the question could be passed upon by a jury, it might probably be otherwise. But if it is only, as it is in this case, an inconvenience, no matter how great, a court of equity would have no right to interfere and abate the nuisance, at any rate before the question is settled at law. ” There is nothing decided in any of the cases referred to by counsel for appellee, inconsistent with this. See, also, High on Injunctions, (1st ed.) sec. 468. *Irwin*v. *Dixon,*9 How. (U. S.) 6, is quite analogous in principle. Of like character are, also, *Lining*v. *Geddes,*1 McCord’s Ch. 304, and *Robeson*v. *Pittinger,*1 Greene’s Ch. 57.

The case not being one which, in our opinion, entitled the complainant to equitable relief, the decree must be reversed and the. bill dismissed.

*Decree reversed.*
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Myoffiz, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10K-SB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jaren Chan Eng Ann, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By   /s/  Jaren Chan Eng Ann

Jaren Chan Eng Ann

Chief Executive Officer





September 22, 2004
No. 89-6598.

#### Peoples *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 3440.1-1 Forms. ( a ) Four copies of the application for a license to mine coal for domestic needs or for a renewal of such a license shall be filed on a form approved by the Director, or a substantial equivalent of the form, in the Bureau of Land Management State Office having jurisdiction over the lands involved (43 CFR subpart 1821).
( b ) The original application or any renewal application shall be accompanied by the fee prescribed in subpart 3473 of this title, except when the application is filed by a relief agency.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies.  Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 18, 2004.
      ( print page 59230)    
**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                

*1.  Cass Information Systems, Inc.*, Bridgeton, Missouri; to acquire substantially all of the assets of NTransit, Inc., and NTransit, LLC, Wellington, Kansas, and thereby engage in data processing and management consulting activities, pursuant to sections 225.28(b)(9)(i)(A)(2) and (b)(14)(i) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 28, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-22177 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 506.09

 505.58

 505.29

 505.84

 505.91

 505.77

 506.97

 506.46

 506.43

 506.41

 506.13

 506.62

 506.34

 506.82

 507.72

 508.01

 507.98

 507.63

 508.15

 507.90

 507.80

 507.65

 507.83

 507.65

 508.09

 508.48

 508.31

 508.15

 508.05

 509.25

 508.97

 62,190

 61,589

 61,248

 61,895

 61,977

 61,813

 63,241

 62,632

 62,596

 62,573

 62,238

 62,823

 62,489

 63,062

 64,150

 64,501

 64,465

 64,041

 64,674

 64,368

 64,247

 64,065

 64,283

 64,065

 64,600

 65,080

 64,871

 64,674

 64,551

 66,032

 65,683

STORAGE

+883

-601

-341

+647

+82

-164

+1,428

-609

-36

-23

-335

+585

-334

+573

+1,088

+351

-36

-424

+633

-306

-121

-182

+218

-218

+535

+480

-209

-197

-123

+1,481

-349

CHANGE

3,708

2,835

3,009

3,464

3,089

2,921

3,750

2,583

3,022

3,178

3,135

3,660

3,182

3,435

3,180

2,369

1,747

1,506

2,022

1,554

1,685

1,689

1,928

1,698

1,892

1,821

1,444

1,427

1,464

2,133

1,149

INFLOW

 2,501

 2,507

 2,537

 2,558

 2,569

 2,575

 2,577

 2,510

 2,516

 2,514

 2,513

 2,509

 2,508

 2,509

 2,239

 2,175

 1,747

 1,706

 1,690

 1,697

 1,739

 1,765

 1,802

 1,795

 1,620

 1,563

 1,532

 1,509

 1,508

 1,368

 1,307

POWER

 686

 547

 557

 518

 406

 376

 382

 284

 380

 526

 675

 772

 693

 491

 168

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 64

 73

 76

 49

 64

 44

 66

 87

 136

 140

 103

 71

 136

 132

 210

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 12

 11

 11

 13

 9

 9

 5

 9

 8

 10

 13

 13

 13

 14

 14

 17

 18

 14

 13

 11

 7

 16

 16

 13

 2

 16

 17

 17

 18

 18

 18

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2014 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 06/01/2014

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +4,376 75,679 64,165 7,461 1,451 395

ACRE-FEET +4,376 150,109 127,271 14,799 2,878 783

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 127,271

SPILL 14,799 144,948

 61,307

OUTLET 2,878

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 3,685

 2,868

 2,990

 3,411

 3,053

 2,859

 3,719

 2,677

 3,041

 3,155

 3,093

 3,611

 3,180

 3,461

 3,209

 2,363

 1,747

 1,524

 2,001

 1,549

 1,722

 1,661

 1,922

 1,704

 1,893

 1,831

 1,429

 1,429

 1,431

 2,100

 1,143

 75,461

 149,677

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
### §744. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1207, §4, 68 Stat. 1100, which related to personal property rights upon publication of roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Loretta McCormack, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Jockey Club, Appellant.

Present — Rolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1058.]
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 217A/1 li

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 217A |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 631 lipca 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 217A

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 631 lipca 2020

---

| Spis treści | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | Sprostowania |
| 2020/C 217 A/01 | Sprostowanie do zaproszenia do wyrażenia zainteresowania – Kontrolerzy w dziedzinie: i) matematyki i statystyki; ii) nauki o danych, kontroli cyfrowych, analizy danych i sieci, eksploracji danych i tekstów, automatyzacji procesów i eksploracji procesów biznesowych – Pracownicy zatrudnieni na czas określony (grupa zaszeregowania AD 5–AD 9) ( Dz.U. C 185 A z 4.6.2020 ) | 1 |

Spis treści

Strona

Sprostowania

2020/C 217 A/01

Sprostowanie do zaproszenia do wyrażenia zainteresowania – Kontrolerzy w dziedzinie: i) matematyki i statystyki; ii) nauki o danych, kontroli cyfrowych, analizy danych i sieci, eksploracji danych i tekstów, automatyzacji procesów i eksploracji procesów biznesowych – Pracownicy zatrudnieni na czas określony (grupa zaszeregowania AD 5–AD 9) ( Dz.U. C 185 A z 4.6.2020 )

( Dz.U. C 185 A z 4.6.2020 )

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

Sprostowania

| 1.7.2020 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 217/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2020

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 217/1

---

Sprostowanie do zaproszenia do wyrażenia zainteresowania – Kontrolerzy w dziedzinie: i) matematyki i statystyki; ii) nauki o danych, kontroli cyfrowych, analizy danych i sieci, eksploracji danych i tekstów, automatyzacji procesów i eksploracji procesów biznesowych – Pracownicy zatrudnieni na czas określony (grupa zaszeregowania AD 5–AD 9)

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 185 A z dnia 4 czerwca 2020 r.
  )

(2020/C 217 A/01)

Strona 4:

zamiast:

„Termin zgłaszania kandydatur upływa 2 lipca 2020 r. o godz. 12.00 (czasu środkowoeuropejskiego)”,

powinno być:

powinno być:

„Termin zgłaszania kandydatur upływa 15 września 2020 r. o godz. 12.00 (czasu środkowoeuropejskiego)”.

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStability of a non-orthogonal stagnation flow to three dimensional disturbancesA similarity solution for a low Mach number nonorthogonal flow impinging on a hot or cold plate is presented. For the constant density case, it is known that the stagnation point shifts in the direction of the incoming flow and that this shift increases as the angle of attack decreases. When the effects of density variations are included, a critical plate temperature exists; above this temperature the stagnation point shifts away from the incoming stream as the angle is decreased. This flow field is believed to have application to the reattachment zone of certain separated flows or to a lifting body at a high angle of attack. Finally, the stability of this nonorthogonal flow to self similar, 3-D disturbances is examined. Stability properties of the flow are given as a function of the parameters of this study; ratio of the plate temperature to that of the outer potential flow and angle of attack. In particular, it is shown that the angle of attack can be scaled out by a suitable definition of an equivalent wavenumber and temporal growth rate, and the stability problem for the nonorthogonal case is identical to the stability problem for the orthogonal case.Document ID19910018187Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLasseigne, D. G.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA., United States)*Jackson, T. L.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1991Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187591NASA-CR-187591ICASE-91-51AD-A239522Accession Number91N27501Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-90-52-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18605Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910018187.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §458c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458c was editorially reclassified as section 5354 of this title.
### §755. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1207, §15, 68 Stat. 1103, which related to execution of patents, deeds, and other instruments by the Secretary of the Interior, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.  FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Executive Officer of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection
with the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K").

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the
Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: March 27, 2008 | /s/GARY S. JACOBGary S. Jacob Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
§ 3514.30 May BLM cancel my lease? ( a ) Yes. BLM may institute appropriate proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to cancel your lease if: ( 1 ) You do not comply with the provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act, other relevant statutes, or regulations applicable to your lease; or
( 2 ) You default on any of the lease terms, covenants or stipulations and continue to fail or default for 30 days after BLM notifies you in writing of your default.
( b ) BLM may cancel your lease administratively if we issued it in violation of any law or regulation. In such a case, we may consider issuing an amended lease, if appropriate.
### §798. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–281, §1(b)(1), May 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 246

Section, act Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 843, §8, 70 Stat. 895, related to applicability of Federal or State tax laws to property distributions.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 10, 2016

No. 04-16-00067-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M., A CHILD,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-09974

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due March 11, 2016, but was not filed. On March 16, 2016, 

this court notified the court reporter that the reporter’s record was late. The court reporter 

responded to our notice on April 25, 2016, by filing a notification of late record. In the 

notification, the reporter stated, among other things, that the record was not filed because 

appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee to prepare the record and

that appellant is not entitled to the record without paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b), 

35.3(b). We therefore ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before May 

6, 2016, that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the 

reporter have been made to pay the reporter’s fee, or (2) appellant is entitled to the record 

without prepayment of the reporter’s fee. See id. R. 35.3(b). We advised appellant that if there 

was no response within the time provided, appellant’s brief would be due on or before May 26, 

2016, and we would consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that did not 

require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id. R. 37.3(c).

On May 6, 2016, appellant filed a response and provided proof that arrangements had 

been made to pay the court reporter for preparation of the record. Accordingly, we ORDER the 

court reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court on or before June 9, 2016. Appellant’s 

brief will be due thirty days after the date the reporter’s record is filed in this court. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the court reporter and all 

counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of May, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### **Subchapter A—Harbor Maintenance Tax**

Sec.
4461.
Imposition of tax.
4462.
Definitions and special rules.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter A (§§4451 to 4457), act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 529, 530, related to tax on playing cards, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–44, title IV, §402, June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 148. Repeal of sections 4451 to 4457 applicable on and after June 22, 1965, see section 701(c)(2) of Pub. L. 89–44, set out in part as an Effective Date of 1965 Amendment note under section 4905 of this title.