alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Seismic and gravity surveys of Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 4 and adjoining areas, Alaska: Exploration of Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 4 and adjacent areas, northern Alaska, 1944-53. Part 4: Geophysics

By: John R. Woolson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp304A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 14**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 15**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 16**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 17**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 18**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 19**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Richard S. Horton, Trustee, v. William Hayden et al.

Filed September 20, 1905.

No. 14,169.

Petition: Sufficiency: Stare Decisis. In an action to recover money that has been paid to defendant pursuant to a judgment in mandamus which was afterwards reversed, a petition which alleges only the, payment of the money in obedience to the writ, and the subsequent reversal of the judgment in mandamus, without allegations of fact showing that the plaintiff is justly entitled to the money in controversy, does hot state a cause of action. A judgment overruling a motion for restitution in the mandamus proceeding upon the ground that under the circumstances of the case the respondent was not entitled to an order of restitution, and that his remedy was in an action at law to establish his right to the money, will be adhered to. The rule of *stare decisis*will be applied.

Error to the district court for Douglas county: Lee S. Estelle, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Hamilton & Maxwell*and *Richard S. Horton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Smyth & Smith, contra.*

Sedgwick, J.

The facts underlying this controversy are stated somewhat in detail in the opinion in *State v. Horton,*70 Neb. 334. The order of the district court sustaining the motion of the respondent there to compel Hayden Brothers to make restitution was reversed, and the cause remanded to the district court, with instructions to dismiss the proceedings. The motion for rehearing was overruled in an opinion which may be found in 70 Neb. 343. It was there held that the general rule announced in *Hier v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass’n,*60 Neb. 320, that “upon the reversal of a judgment which has been executed it is the duty of the court to compel restitution,” was not of universal application, and that restitution is not in all cases *340a matter of absolute right. It rests in the sound discretion of the court. It was said that under the circumstances of this case “the court would not, in this summary proceeding, order a return of the money in controversy,” and that “this was not a proper case in which to summarily order a return of the money before the rights of the parties had been adjudicated in an action at law.” 70 Neb. 343.

The petition in the case at bar counted solely upon the allegation that the money had been obtained by Hayden Brothers from the exposition company by the operation of the writ of mandamus, and that the order allowing the writ of mandamus had been reversed, and that cause dismissed. There was no allegation of any facts from which it could be found that Hayden Brothers were justly indebted to the exposition company or to the trustee in bankruptcy. It was determined in the former decisions cited that allegations identically the same as those contained in this petition did not, under the circumstances disclosed in that case,. entitle the trustee in bankruptcy to any relief. We were satisfied, then, with the conclusion reached, and we see no ground now to change our views. The district court sustained a general demurrer to the petition, and the plaintiff electing to stand upon the petition, the action was dismissed.

This judgment of the district court was right, and is

Affirmed.
§ 4.1031 Under what circumstances will the ALJ authorize a party to obtain discovery of information? ( a ) *General.* A party may obtain discovery of information to assist in preparing or presenting its case only if the ALJ determines that the party has met the criteria set forth in paragraph (b) of this section and authorizes the discovery in a written order or during a prehearing conference. Available methods of discovery are: ( 1 ) Written interrogatories;
( 2 ) Depositions; and
( 3 ) Requests for production of designated documents or tangible things or for entry on designated land for inspection or other purposes.
( b ) *Criteria.* The ALJ may authorize discovery only under extraordinary circumstances and if the party requesting discovery demonstrates: ( 1 ) That the discovery will not unreasonably delay the hearing process;
( 2 ) That the scope of the discovery is not unduly burdensome;
( 3 ) That the method to be used is the least burdensome method available;
( 4 ) That any confidential information can be adequately safeguarded; and
( 5 ) That the information sought: ( i ) Will be admissible at the hearing or appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;
( ii ) Is not otherwise obtainable by the party;
( iii ) Is not cumulative or repetitious; and
( iv ) Is not privileged or protected from disclosure by applicable law.
( c ) *Motions.* A party seeking the ALJ's authorization for discovery must file a motion that: ( 1 ) Briefly describes the proposed methodology, purpose, and scope of the discovery;
( 2 ) Explains how the discovery meets the criteria in paragraph (b) of this section; and
( 3 ) Attaches a copy of any proposed discovery request (written interrogatories, notice of deposition, or request for production of designated documents or tangible things or for entry on designated land).
( d ) *Timing of motions.* Any discovery motion under paragraph (c) of this section must be filed: ( 1 ) Within 30 days after issuance of the docketing notice under § 4.1020 if the discovery sought is between the petitioner and OFA; and
( 2 ) Within 50 days after issuance of the docketing notice under § 4.1020 if the discovery sought is between a full intervenor and another party.
( e ) *Objections.* ( 1 ) A party must file any objections to a discovery motion or to specific portions of a proposed discovery request within 10 days after service of the motion.
( 2 ) An objection must explain how, in the objecting party's view, the discovery sought does not meet the criteria in paragraph (b) of this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,841,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                   741,865
<INVENTORY>                                    265,068
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,930,486
<PP&E>                                       2,715,448
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,561,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,187,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,036,182
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       204,175
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,972,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,187,234
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,160,284
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,652,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               222,952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                134,331
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            134,331
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   134,331
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# USHMC - Comprehensive Housing Market Analyses

## Comprehensive Housing Market Analyses

HUD's Economic and Market Analysis Division prepares Comprehensive Housing Market Analyses that assist and guide HUD in its operations. The factual information, findings, and conclusions contained in the reports could also be useful to builders, mortgagees, and others concerned with local housing conditions and trends. For each analysis, HUD economists develop a factual framework based on information available, as of a particular date, from both local and national sources. Each analysis takes into consideration changes in the economic, demographic, and housing inventory characteristics of a specific                             housing market area during three periods: from 2000 to 2010,                             from 2010 to the as-of date of the analysis, and from the                             as-of date to a forecast date. The reports present counts                             and estimates of employment, population, households, and housing                             inventory. 

*Note: Readers who incorporate portions of the content from this publication in their own works, both print and electronic, are requested to give full attribution to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Policy Development and Research.*

Click here for additional data pertaining to the housing market for the following Comprehensive Housing Market Analyses.

Click here for accessing scanned historical analysis reports.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T35N

T34N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

OHV Designations

Map 2-13 SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Alternative 1

Open

Limited to Existing Roads and Trails

Closed

Seasonal Limitations
S

a

c

r

a

m

e

n t o

R i v

e r

25 30

24 19

T15N R1W T15N R1E

76.2 L

SSUUTTTTEE RR CCOO

CCOOLLUUSSAA CC OO

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion Contract No. 14-06-200-1851A-R-1

Exhibit B

Davis, Grover L. and I. Meriel

725-202-20

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.25 0.5

Miles

Date: November 1, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\davis_grover_meriel\davis_grover_meriel.mxd
§ 2320.3 Applications for restoration. ( a ) Other than with respect to national forest lands, applications for restoration and opening of lands withdrawn or classified for power purposes under the provisions of section 24 of the Federal Power Act shall be filed, in duplicate, in the proper office of the Bureau of Land Management as set forth in § 2321.2-1 of this title. No particular form of application is required, but it shall be typewritten or in legible handwriting, and it shall contain the information required by 18 CFR 25.1. Each application shall be accompanied by a service charge of $10 which is not returnable.
( b ) Favorable action upon an application for restoration shall not give the applicant any preference right when the lands are opened.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,296.82

 2,296.59

 2,296.42

 2,296.29

 2,296.09

 2,295.91

 2,295.67

 2,295.44

 2,295.20

 2,295.10

 2,294.96

 2,294.78

 2,294.60

 2,294.42

 2,294.32

 2,294.13

 2,293.95

 2,293.77

 2,293.62

 2,293.48

 2,293.30

 2,293.08

 2,292.86

 2,292.72

 2,292.39

 2,292.03

 2,291.87

 2,291.57

 2,291.32

 2,291.03

 1,424.9

 1,422.2

 1,420.3

 1,418.8

 1,416.4

 1,414.4

 1,411.6

 1,408.9

 1,406.2

 1,405.0

 1,403.4

 1,401.4

 1,399.3

 1,397.2

 1,396.1

 1,393.9

 1,391.9

 1,389.8

 1,388.1

 1,386.5

 1,384.4

 1,381.9

 1,379.4

 1,377.9

 1,374.1

 1,370.0

 1,368.2

 1,364.9

 1,362.0

 1,358.8

STORAGE

-2.2

-2.7

-2.0

-1.5

-2.3

-2.1

-2.8

-2.7

-2.8

-1.2

-1.6

-2.1

-2.1

-2.1

-1.1

-2.2

-2.1

-2.1

-1.7

-1.6

-2.1

-2.5

-2.5

-1.6

-3.7

-4.1

-1.8

-3.4

-2.8

-3.3

CHANGE

144

114

209

91

198

143

137

111

58

465

163

268

397

319

274

286

232

104

356

251

203

172

185

233

159

70

142

159

76

120

INFLOW

 1,235

 1,441

 1,196

 851

 1,336

 1,168

 1,518

 1,431

 1,439

 1,046

 958

 1,271

 1,434

 1,349

 844

 1,377

 1,264

 1,131

 1,191

 1,032

 1,224

 1,433

 1,440

 1,010

 2,040

 2,115

 1,049

 1,852

 1,484

 1,737

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 16

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

OUTLET

 20

 17

 7

 0

 31

 24

 14

 17

 14

 0

 17

 37

 3

 10

 7

 7

 7

 7

 27

 23

 13

 3

 3

 23

 3

 10

 3

 10

 10

 13

C.F.S.

 .06

 .05

 .02

 .00

 .09

 .07

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .00

 .05

 .11

 .01

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .08

 .07

 .04

 .01

 .01

 .07

 .01

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .18

 .10

 .00

 .47

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .18

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2007 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 7, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -68.8 5,839 39,896 16 1 380 1.13 1.00

ACRE-FEET -68,800 11,582 79,134 32 2 754

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 79,134

SPILL 32

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2

 79,168

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.00

JULY 1, 2007 5.42

 1,427.1

Table 4

(1) (1)
### **Subchapter M—Regulated Investment Companies and Real Estate Investment Trusts**

Part
I.
Regulated investment companies.
II.
Real estate investment trusts.
III.
Provisions which apply to both regulated investment companies and real estate investment trusts.
IV.
Real estate mortgage investment conduits.
[V.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §835(b)(12), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1594, struck out item for part V "Financial asset securitization investment trusts".

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §1621(c), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1867, added item for part V.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1018(u)(30), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3591, added item for part IV.

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–600, title III, §362(d)(8), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2852, added item for part III.
#### Jack Kleinman, Respondent, v. Harold Kleinman, Appellant.

Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
JAMES STAFFORD James Stafford Chartered Accountants Suite 350  1111 Melville Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6E 3V6 Telephone +1 604 669 0711 Facsimile +1 604 669 0754      Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm   The Board of Directors Alberta Star Development Corp.  We consent to the incorporation of our report dated 22 March 2010, except as to Note 17 which is as of 29 March 2010, with respect to the balance sheets of Alberta Star Development Corp. (An Exploration Stage Company) (the Company) as at 30 November 2009 and 2008, the related statements of loss, comprehensive loss and deficit and cash flows for the period from 6 September 1996 (Date of Inception) to 30 November 2009 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended 30 November 2009 and the statement of changes in shareholders equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended 30 November 2009 in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company dated 9 April 2009.  Our report dated 22 March 2010, except as to Note 17 which is as of 29 March 2010, included additional comments for U.S. readers on Canada  U.S. Reporting Differences. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.   /s/ James Stafford Vancouver, Canada Chartered Accountants  9 April 2010
#### § 3410.3-2 Limitations on exploration licenses.

The issuance of exploration licenses for an area shall not preclude the issuance of a Federal coal lease under applicable regulations for that area. If such a lease is issued for lands included in an exploration license, the authorized officer shall cancel the exploration license on the effective date of the lease for those lands which are common to both.

[44 FR 42613, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33135, July 30, 1982]
#### § 3934.21 Written notice of default.

The BLM will provide the lessee or licensee written notice of any default, breach, or cause of forfeiture, and provide a time period of 30 calendar days to correct the default, to request an extension of time in which to correct the default, or to submit evidence showing why the BLM is in error and why the lease should not be canceled or exploration license terminated.
#### § 3862.1-5 Statement required that land is unreserved, unoccupied, unimproved, and unappropriated.

Each person making application for patent under the mining laws, for lands in Alaska, must furnish a duly corroborated statement showing that no portion of the land applied for is occupied or reserved by the United States, so as to prevent its acquisition under said laws; that the land is not occupied or claimed by natives of Alaska; and that the land is unoccupied, unimproved and unappropriated by any person claiming the same other than the applicant.
§ 3837.24 What kind of evidence must I submit to BLM to show I have properly notified the delinquent co-claimant? ( a ) If you gave written notice to the delinquent co-claimant by personal service, you must sign and submit a notarized affidavit explaining how and when you delivered the written notice to the delinquent co-claimant.
( b ) If you gave written notice to the delinquent co-claimant by mail, you must submit: ( 1 ) A copy of the notice you mailed to the delinquent co-claimant; and
( 2 ) A copy of the signed U.S. Postal Service return receipt from the registered or certified envelope in which you sent the notice to the delinquent co-claimant.
( c ) If you published the notice in a newspaper, you must submit: ( 1 ) A statement from the newspaper publisher or the publisher's authorized representative describing the publication, including the beginning and ending dates of publication;
( 2 ) A printed copy of the published notice; and
( 3 ) A notarized affidavit attesting that you conducted a diligent search for the delinquent co-claimant, you could not locate the delinquent co-claimant, and therefore notification by publication was necessary.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3632]


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Amendment <greek-i>2

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
September 22, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
include Franklin, Lebanon, Montour, Tioga, and York counties as 
disaster areas due to damages caused by Tropical Depression Ivan 
occurring on September 17, 2004 and continuing.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous county of Steuben in the State of 
New York; and Baltimore, Carroll, Frederick, and Harford Counties in 
the State of Maryland may be filed until the specified date at the 
previously designated location. All other counties contiguous to the 
above named primary counties have previously been declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is November 18, 2004 and for 
economic injury the deadline is June 20, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008).

    Dated: September 27, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-22288 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P