alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 3172.9 Drill stem testing.

(a) *Requirements.* Initial opening of drill stem test tools shall be restricted to daylight hours unless specific approval to start during other hours is obtained from the authorized officer. However, drill stem tests (DSTs) may be allowed to continue at night if the test was initiated during daylight hours and the rate of flow is stabilized and if adequate lighting is available (*i.e.,* lighting which is adequate for visibility and vapor-proof for safe operations). Packers can be released, but tripping shall not begin before daylight, unless prior approval is obtained from the authorized officer. Closed chamber DSTs may be accomplished day or night.

(b) *Minimum standards for drill stem testing.*

(1) A DST that flows to the surface with evidence of hydrocarbons shall be either reversed out of the testing string under controlled surface conditions, or displaced into the formation prior to pulling the test tool. This would involve providing some means for reserve circulation.

| Violation | Corrective action | Normal abatement period |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Major | Contingent on circumstances and as specified by the authorized officer | Prompt correction required. |

Table 1 to § 3172.9(b)(1)

(2) Separation equipment required for the anticipated recovery shall be properly installed before a test starts.

| Violation | Corrective action | Normal abatement period |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Major | Install required equipment | Prompt correction required. |

Table 2 to § 3172.9(b)(2)

(3) All engines within 100 feet of the wellbore that are required to “run” during the test shall have spark arresters or water-cooled exhausts.

| Violation | Corrective action | Normal abatement period |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Major | Install required equipment | Prompt correction required. |

Table 3 to § 3172.9(b)(3)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Station Freedom resource allocation accommodation of technology payload requirementsAn overview of the Office of Aeronautics, Exploration, and Technology (OAET) Space Station Freedom Technology Payload Development Program is provided, and the OAET Station resource requirements are reviewed. The requirements are contrasted with current proposed resource allocations. A discussion of the issues and conclusions are provided. It is concluded that an overall 20 percent resource allocation is appropriate to support OAET's technology development program, that some resources are inadequate even at the 20 percent level, and that bartering resources among U.S. users and international partners and increasing the level of automation may be viable solutions to the resource constraint problem.Document ID19910007519Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsAvery, Don E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Collier, Lisa D.*(Computer Technology Associates, Inc., Hampton VA., United States)*Gartrell, Charles F.*(General Research Corp. Washington, DC., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1990Subject CategoryAdministration And ManagementReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102766NAS 1.15:102766Accession Number91N16832Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-49-31-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007519.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MUWSA GREEN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 421 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of December, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANDREW STARK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2659

[July 22, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562017CF003128A.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant

Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Andrew Stark, Doral, appellant.

No appearance filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 716

 752

 713

 705

 731

 710

 666

 681

 636

 648

 634

 637

 690

 685

 661

 610

 613

 621

 589

 603

 604

 592

 615

 602

 607

 607

 613

 612

 573

 570

 664

 663

 664

 605

 657

 632

 614

 608

 568

 588

 596

 591

 587

 613

 575

 554

 557

 516

 528

 544

 518

 528

 514

 560

 543

 556

 577

 556

 533

 531

 695

 708

 694

 659

 697

 664

 641

 641

 597

 610

 612

 620

 654

 641

 615

 583

 587

 574

 558

 569

 554

 561

 550

 580

 574

 579

 600

 589

 555

 549

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 23, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 695

 1,403

 2,097

 2,756

 3,453

 4,117

 4,758

 5,399

 5,996

 6,606

 7,218

 7,838

 8,492

 9,133

 9,748

 10,331

 10,918

 11,492

 12,050

 12,619

 13,173

 13,734

 14,284

 14,864

 15,438

 16,017

 16,617

 17,206

 17,761

 18,310

 695

 702

 699

 689

 691

 686

 680

 675

 666

 661

 656

 653

 653

 652

 650

 646

 642

 638

 634

 631

 627

 624

 621

 619

 618

 616

 615

 615

 612

 610

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
financial statements for the six month period ending June 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000739918
<NAME>         ONE FINANCIAL PLACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>   1
<CURRENCY>     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1
<CASH>                                          18
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                              (2,669,372)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           173,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (173,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (173,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (173,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (309.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (309.68)
        


</TABLE>
TKP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0327

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v.

THOMAS JAMES LUCERO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including February 2, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 28 2022

12/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0327
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Cal-Bay  International, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Charles  A. Prebay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




                              /s/Charles  A.  Prebay
                              -------------------------
                              Chief  Financial  Officer
                              March  21,  2003
§ 3809.556 What special requirements apply to financial guarantees described in § 3809.555(e)? ( a ) If you choose to use the instruments permitted under § 3809.555(e) in satisfaction of financial guarantee requirements, you must provide BLM, before you begin operations and by the end of each calendar year thereafter, a certified statement describing the nature and market value of the instruments maintained in that account, and including any current statements or reports furnished by the brokerage firm to the operator or mining claimant concerning the asset value of the account.
( b ) You must review the market value of the account instruments by December 31 of each year to ensure that their market value continues to be not less than the required dollar amount of the financial guarantee. When the market value of the account instruments has declined by more than 10 percent of the required dollar amount of the financial guarantee, you must, within 10 calendar days after its annual review or at any time upon the written request of BLM, provide additional instruments, as defined in § 3809.555(e), to the trust account so that the total market value of all account instruments is not less than the required dollar amount of the financial guarantee. You must send a certified statement to BLM within 45 calendar days thereafter describing your actions to raise the market value of its account instruments to the required dollar amount of the financial guarantee. You must include copies of any statements or reports furnished by the brokerage firm to you documenting such an increase.
( c ) If your review under paragraph (b) of this section demonstrates that the total market value of trust account instruments exceeds 110 percent of the required dollar amount of the financial guarantee, you may ask BLM to authorize a written release of that portion of the account that exceeds 110 percent of the required financial guarantee. BLM will approve your request only if you are in compliance with the terms and conditions of your notice or approved plan of operations.
----

**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 I, Lawrence J. Finn, certify  that: 

 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form  10-KSB/A of Terax Energy, Inc.

 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not  misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information  included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant  as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible establishing  and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:

           a) designed such  disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures  to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating  to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to  us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which  this annual report is being prepared;

           b) evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented  in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual  report based on such evaluation; and

           c) disclosed in  this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting  that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control  over financial reporting; and

 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based  on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board  of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

           a) all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal  control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect  the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial  information; and

           b) any fraud,  whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have  a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 Date: May 25, 2006 

/s/ Lawrence J. Finn Chief Executive  Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 24.3**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

As a director of New Page Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and ofNewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the ***“Company”***), I hereby constitute and appoint David J. Prystash, Douglas K. Cooper, and Mark A. Suwyn, and each of them, with full power to act without theothers, as my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2008 (***“Form 10-K”***), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other documents in connection with the Form10-K, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as fully toall intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power ofAttorney. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 26th day of February, 2009.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      Timothy J. Koziol, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10QSB of General
      Environmental Management, Inc. for
      the
      quarterly period ending June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB fairly presents
      in
      all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
      General Environmental Management, Inc. of Nevada.








Date:  August
      14, 2006


By: /s/
      Timothy J. Koziol


Timothy
        J. Koziol, President,
 CEO,
        and
        Chairman of the Board of Directors






31
**Exhibit
      31.2**




SECTION
      302 CERTIFICATION




I,
      Michael Hillmeyer, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Avantogen Oncology, Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as the end of the period covered by this report; and




c)
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, based on our evaluation as of the end of
      the
      period covered by this report.




Date:
                October 26, 2007By:
            /s/
                Michael HillmeyerMichael
                Hillmeyer
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
§ 3922.10 Application processing fee. ( a ) An applicant nominating or applying for a tract for competitive leasing must pay a cost recovery or processing fee that the BLM will determine on a case-by-case basis as described in § 3000.11 of this chapter and as modified by the following provisions.
( b ) The cost recovery process for a competitive oil shale lease is as follows: ( 1 ) The applicant nominating the tract for competitive leasing must pay the fee before the BLM will process the application and publish a notice of competitive lease sale;
( 2 ) The BLM will publish a sale notice no later than 30 days before the proposed sale. The BLM will include in the sale notice a statement of the total cost recovery fee paid to the BLM by the applicant, up to 30 calendar days before the sale;
( 3 ) Before the lease is issued: ( i ) The successful bidder, if someone other than the applicant, must pay to the BLM the cost recovery amount specified in the sale notice, including the cost of the NEPA analysis; and
( ii ) The successful bidder must pay all processing costs the BLM incurs after the date of the sale notice;
( 4 ) If the successful bidder is someone other than the applicant, the BLM will refund to the applicant the amount paid under paragraph (b)(1) of this section;
( 5 ) If there is no successful bidder, the applicant is responsible for all processing fees; and
( 6 ) If the successful bidder is someone other than the applicant, within 30 calendar days after the lease sale, the successful bidder must file an application in accordance with § 3922.20.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 320th District Court of Potter County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on September

30, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Malcolm Brown v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-15-00322-CR Trial Court Number: 69690-D

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated September 30, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on December 16, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK