T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

G a o n ac o n s e n te dto p r o c e e db e f o r e am a g is tr a te ju d g e . See 28 ** U . S . C . § 6 36 (c ) .

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR T I N P AR T I DA GA ON A, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. K U S H N E R ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 15155 D . C . N o . 1 : 0 6 - c v - 0 0 8 6 5 - S MS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S andr aM . S ny de r , M a gi s tr a t e Judge , P r e s i di ng ** S ubm i tt e d F e bruary21, 2012 *** B e f o r e : F E RN A N D E Z , M c K E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . M art i n P art i daG a ona , aC a l i f oni as t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g h is 4 2 U .S .C .§ 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g d e lib e r a te 

# FI LED MA R 06 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 15155 2 i n d i f f e r e n c e t o s e r i o u s me d i c a l n e e d s . W e h av e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . R es ni ck v. H ayes , 2 1 3 F .3 d4 4 3 , 4 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . W e a f f irm . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed G aona’ s a ct i on for f ai l ure t o st at e a c la im b e c au s e G a o n af

a ile dto a lle g e f

a c ts s h o w in g th a t d e f

e n d an ts a c te dw ith d e lib e r a te in d if

f e r e n c e in th e tr e a tm e n t o f h is in f e c tio n w ith V a lle yF e v e r . See T oguc hiv . Chung , 3 9 1 F . 3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 6 0 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ) (d el ib erat e i n d i fferen ce i s a h ig h le g a l s tan d ar d ; m a lp r a c tic e o rn e g lig e n c e d o e s n o t c o n s titu te an E ig h th A m e n d m e n t v io la tio n ) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g G a o n ale a v e to a m e nd hi s thi r d a m e nde d c om pl a i nt , w he r e i tha d pr e vi ous l ypr ovi de d not i c e of the c o m p la in t’s d e f

ic ie n c ie s an dg r an te dle a v e to a m e n d . See Cho do s v . W es t P ub l ’g C o. , 292 F . 3d 992, 1003 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( s e tt i ng f orth s t andar d of

r e vi e w and no t i ng thatcourt ’ s di sc re t i on i s part i cul ar l y broad w here i thas a l re ady grant ed le a v e to a m e n d ) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng G a ona ’ s m ot i on f or appo i ntm entof coun se l because G aona fai l ed t o d em on strat e e xcept i on al c ir c u m s tan c e s . See P alm erv. V aldez , 560 F . 3d 965, 970 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( s e tt i ng f orth s t andar d of

r e vi e w and r e qui r e m e ntof “ e xc e pt i ona l c i r c um s t anc e s ” f or11- 15155 3 ap p o in tm e n t o f

c o u n s e l) . G a o n a ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s ar e u n p e r s u a s iv e . AF F I RME D.