alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Fredie RAMOS-BARRIENTOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50875.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*320Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Fredie Ramos-Barrientos raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Bank of Hampton Roads, a Virginia corporation, is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.



|(1) | Bank of Hampton Roads Service Corporation, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of Hampton Roads.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Gateway Insurance Services, Inc, a North Carolina corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of Hampton Roads.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (i) | Insurance Express Premium Finance, a North Carolina corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gateway Insurance Services, Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Gateway Investment Services, Inc, a North Carolina corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of Hampton Roads.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Gateway Bank Mortgage, Inc, a North Carolina corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of Hampton Roads.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shore Bank, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.



|(1) | Shore Investments Service Corporation (Shore Investments Inc.), a Virginia corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Shore Bank.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (i) | Shore Investments, Inc. owns a 6% interest in Bankers Title, LLC, which was organized in Virginia.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hampton Roads Investments, Inc., a Virginia corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.

Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. owns a 7% interest in Davenport Financial Fund, LLC, which was organized in Virginia.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 6, 2013

jam

Order 

Clerk

August 6, 2013

147510 (59)

AMY M. OGILVIE, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 147510

COA: 310935

ERIC ARLINGTON OGILVIE, 

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, defendant shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $1.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If defendant timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to defendant’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$374.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) defendant shall not file further appeals in 

civil actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to defendant

and return defendant’s pleadings with this order.
### §4207. Profits from dealings with discharged seamen; prohibition

No consular officer, nor any person under any consular officer shall make any charge or receive, directly or indirectly, any compensation, by way of commission or otherwise, for receiving or disbursing the wages or extra wages to which any seaman or mariner is entitled who is discharged in any foreign country, or for any money advanced to any such seaman or mariner who seeks relief from any consulate; nor shall any consular officer, or any person under any consular officer, be interested, directly or indirectly, in any profit derived from clothing, boarding or otherwise supplying or sending home any such seaman or mariner. Such prohibition as to profit, however, shall not be construed to relieve or prevent any such officer who is the owner of or otherwise interested in any vessel of the United States from transporting in such vessel any such seaman or mariner, or from receiving or being interested in such reasonable allowance as may be made for such transportation by law.

(R.S. §1719; Apr. 5, 1906, ch. 1366, §3, 34 Stat. 100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §1719 derived from act Aug. 18, 1856, ch. 127, §20, 11 Stat. 59.

Reference to "commercial agency" was omitted in view of the abolition of the grade of commercial agent by act Apr. 5, 1906.

Section was not enacted as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 1187 of this title, and prior thereto to section 90 of this title.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4131

_____________________________

MICHAEL PATTERSON SWAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John L. Miller, Judge.

June 17, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
City of Devils Lake 

423 6th Street NE 

POBox1048 

City Commission: 

Richard Johnson, President 

Rick Morse 

Devils Lake, ND 58301-1048 

Fax:70l-662-7612 

www.dvlnd.com 

Tim Heisler 

Craig Stromme 

Dale Robbins 

January 6, 2014 

Kevin Schlemmer 

Chief, Essential Air Service and Domestic Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, W86-308 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer, 

.... •,) 

The City of Devils Lake, North Dakota thanks you for the opportunity to respond to the Essential 

Air Service proposals for service to the City of Devils Lake. 

The City of Devils Lake, in conjunction with the State of North Dakota and the FAA, has made 

significant upgrades to our airport. When the current project is completed, together we will have 

invested over $12M. Improvements include a new Terminal dedicated with Senator Dorgan's 

assistance, a new ARRF building and major runway renovation. 

The last piece we need is a strong air service provider. We feel strongly that SKYWEST should 

be awarded the EAS contract. Our bookings had been climbing steadily over the years when we 

were being serviced by DELTA with the SAAB aircraft. Since the switch to Great Lakes Airlines 

we have seen significant change. Their dependability continues to erode, there have been 

booking problems and the local travelers have simply lost all trust in them as a carrier. We are 

very excited about the possibilities that SKYWEST would present. They are a dependable, major 

carrier with jet service. 

The last couple years we have seen a large spike in economic development in our area. We feel a 

strong air carrier is a big part of the future growth of our City. The development of the western 

part of our state is starting to trickle eastward and we are seeing the impacts of that. We have a 

number of housing developments in process and others being planned. Plans have been drawn up 

to develop another industrial park. A Regional Training Center has also been completed at our 

National Guard Camp which draws students from around the country. 

We feel the addition of jet service would capture most of the local travelers as well as more from 

the surrounding communities. We would concur with waiving the 12 round trips per week 

required in the current proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to give our input. 

···.·.-\ 

i•·· ·--: .. 

TERRY L. JOHNSTON 

City Administrator 

701-662-7600 ext I 

LINDA LYBECK 

City Auditor 

701-662-7600 ext 1 

GARY A MARTINSON MICHAEL E. GRAFSGAARD J. THOMAS TRAYNOR, JR. 

Assessor/Building Official Engineer 

701-662-7600 ext 3 701-662-7600 ext 2 

Attorney 

701-662-4077
§ 3825.0-3 Authority. ( a ) The Act of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 984; 25 U.S.C. 461-479), as amended by the Act of August 28, 1937 (50 Stat. 862; 25 U.S.C. 463), revokes departmental order of October 28, 1932, which temporarily withdrew from all forms of mineral entry or claim the lands within the Tohono O'Odham Indian Reservation and restores, as of June 18, 1934, such lands to exploration, location and purchase under the existing mining laws of the United States.
( b ) The regulations in this part apply to entries made prior to May 27, 1955. By virtue of the Act of May 27, 1955 (69 Stat. 67; 25 U.S.C. 463) mineral entries may no longer be made within the Tohono O'Odham Indian Reservation.
[35 FR 9747, June 13, 1970, as amended at 62 FR 65378, Dec. 12, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements for the six month period ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          39,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,981
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,746
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,981
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,765
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,765)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,765)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,765)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0)
        

</TABLE>
CVPIA Annual Work Plans

Public Meeting 

February 17, 2011

Agenda

1:00 p.m. Introductions and Opening Comments (Program Administrators) 

1:15 p.m. Anadromous Fish Restoration Program - Section 3406(b)(1)

Ramon Martin, Fish and Wildlife Service

1:40 p.m. Contra Costa Canal Pumping Plant - Section 3406 (b)(5)

Rachel Martin, Contra Costa Water District

2:05 p.m. Red Bluff Diversion Dam – Section 3406 (b)(10)

Bill Vanderwaal, Reclamation

2:30 p.m. Anadromous Fish Screen Program - Section 3406 (b)(21)

Dan Meier, Fish and Wildlife Service

2:55 p.m. Trinity River Restoration Program- Section 3406 (b)(1)“other” & (b)(23)

Jennifer Faler, Reclamation

3:20 p.m. Refuges Water Supply Program – Section 3406 (d)(1)(2)(5)

Tim Rust, Reclamation

3:45 p.m. Closing Comments and Adjourn (Shana Kaplan & Cesar Blanco)

The meeting will be held: 

Sacramento

Thursday, February 17, 2011

1 - 4 p.m.

Federal Building, 2800 Cottage Way

Conference Room C-1001 and 1002

The CVPIA Annual Work Plans for FY 2011 will be available after Monday, January 31, 2011, 

on the Internet at: http://www.usbr.gov/mp/cvpia/docs_reports/awp/2011/index.html. Under the 

heading “Annual Workplan Drafts”, click on “FY 2011.” 

For additional information, please contact Ms. Evelyn Erlandsen in Reclamation’s Resources 

Management Division at 

916-978-5214 or e-mail eerlandsen@usbr.gov

Revised 2-17-11
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 20, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00545-CR

LUIS MIGUEL GONZALES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1374444

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to burglary of a habitation. In accordance 

with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced 

appellant to confinement for eight years in the Institutional Division of the Texas 

Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We 

dismiss the appeal. 
2

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in 

which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no 

right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is 

included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports 

the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2005).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices McCally and Busby.

Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61017-CIV-ALTMAN/Hunt

ARTURO MORALES,

Plaintiff,

v.

SUNRISE MEATS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER SCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE

The Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (the 

“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 203. Consistent with the Court’s practices in such cases, counsel are 

directed to appear at a status conference on Tuesday, July 21, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. The 

conference will be conducted telephonically. At that time, the parties shall dial 1-888-363-4734 

and enter access code 9127026, followed by the # symbol. Counsel must not utilize 

speakerphone functionality during the hearing. If possible, counsel should use a landline. 

Instructions for the status conference are as follows:

1. The parties are not personally required to appear, but a representative of each 

party with full authority to enter a full and complete compromise must appear. 

2. If an agreement is reached, the parties shall promptly notify the Court.

3. The Plaintiff’s counsel must appear with the entire case file. If any of the 

Defendants have not yet appeared, the Plaintiff must serve a copy of this 

Order on any such Defendant within two business days of the date of this 

Order. 

4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter this Order in the following cases:

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 1 of 3
2

a. 20-cv-61017 – Morales v. Sunrise Meats, Inc. et al.

i. (Call in time: 1:00 p.m.)

b. 20-cv-22607 – Flores et al. v. Gateway Airport Concessions, Inc et al.

i. (Call in time: 1:10 p.m.)

c. 20-cv-61248 – Charles-Pierre v. Millennium Steel, Inc et al.

i. (Call in time: 1:20 p.m.)

d. 20-cv-81029 – Pennington et al. v. U-Tiki Beach, LLC et al.

i. (Call in time: 1:30 p.m.)

e. 19-cv-62848 – Hearns v. All Dade Plumbing, Inc.

i. (Call in time: 1:40 p.m.)

f. 20-cv-61025 - Abdulaal v. Beauty Discount Zone

i. (Call in time: 1:50 p.m.)

g. 20-cv-61356 – Lookrwah-Andrews v. Blueocean Marine Serv. LLC, et al.

i. (Call in time: 2:00 p.m.)

h. 20-cv-61352 – Lima et al. v. Westmoreland Protection Agency Inc. et al.

i. (Call in time: 2:10 p.m.)

i. 20-cv-60885 – Thompson v. Fort Lauderdale Law Group

i. (Call in time: 2:20 p.m.)

j. 20-cv-61381 – Greenblatt et al v. Green Planet Corp.

i. (Call in time: 2:30 p.m.)

k. 20-cv-61343 – Barraza v. Mito’s USA LLC et al.

i. (Call in time: 2:40 p.m.)

l. 20-cv-61210 – Izaguirre v. Project V Inc. et al.

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 2 of 3
i. (Call in time: 2:50 p.m.)

m. 20-cv-60913 – KCI v. Krisak

i. (Call in time: 3:00 p.m.)

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 13th day of July 2020.

 _________________________________

 ROY K. ALTMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-60885-RKA Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 3 of 3
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Ratesetting
            - CVP Annual Ratebooks & Schedules
            - CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2015     

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP)                  - About the CVP
                - Water Info Links
                - Ratesetting
                - Projects/Activities
                - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation                         of the CVP and SWP
                - Laws/Regs/Links
                - Financial Information 
                - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
              - Programs & Activities
              - Projects & Facilities
              - Doing Business with Reclamation
              - Public Affairs
              - Employment
              - Recreation
              - Site Index
              - Contact Us

## CVP Ratebooks - Irrigation, 2015

*Note:  Documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) require Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher to view, download Adobe Acrobat Reader*

*Last Updated: 7/16/20*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

          - Contact Us
          - Site Index
          - Accessibility
          - Disclaimer
          - DOI
          - FOIA
          - No Fear Act
          - Notices
          - Privacy Policy
          - Quality of Information
          - Recreation.gov
          - USA.gov
§ 3264.10 What must I submit to BLM after I complete a well? You must submit a Geothermal Well Completion Report, Form 3260-4, within 30 days after you complete a well. Your report must include the following: ( a ) A complete, chronological well history;
( b ) A copy of all logs;
( c ) Copies of all directional surveys; and
( d ) Copies of all mechanical, flow, reservoir, and other test data.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) onForm 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Robert L. Gerry, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 7, 2007
### §5332. Sovereign immunity and trusteeship rights unaffected

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as—

(1) affecting, modifying, diminishing, or otherwise impairing the sovereign immunity from suit enjoyed by an Indian tribe; or

(2) authorizing or requiring the termination of any existing trust responsibility of the United States with respect to the Indian people.

(Pub. L. 93–638, title I, §111, formerly §110, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2213; renumbered §111, Pub. L. 100–472, title II, §206(b), Oct. 5, 1988, 102 Stat. 2295.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, known as the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 450n of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Julius Gartner, Appellant, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus, Directing the Examining Board of Plumbers, Respondent, to Reissue a License to the Petitioner.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.