alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 675

 651

 633

 617

 654

 638

 700

 723

 741

 763

 794

 793

 803

 824

 823

 843

 864

 853

 839

 833

 843

 848

 835

 733

 593

 466

 433

 379

 397

 428

 537

 572

 606

 525

 541

 622

 612

 625

 702

 719

 740

 765

 780

 790

 794

 815

 747

 835

 817

 826

 819

 818

 807

 726

 534

 291

 343

 356

 330

 382

 396

 432

 629

 630

 580

 574

 640

 624

 659

 715

 729

 750

 778

 786

 797

 807

 818

 828

 853

 842

 832

 828

 826

 835

 784

 676

 456

 407

 402

 350

 391

 407

 485

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 20,552

 20,538

 20,466

 20,375

 20,332

 20,268

 20,221

 20,217

 20,231

 20,268

 20,314

 20,361

 20,432

 20,531

 20,660

 20,835

 21,035

 21,220

 21,396

 21,565

 21,736

 21,931

 22,068

 22,083

 21,853

 21,547

 21,223

 20,849

 20,518

 20,233

 20,089

 685

 685

 682

 679

 678

 676

 674

 674

 674

 676

 677

 679

 681

 684

 689

 695

 701

 707

 713

 719

 725

 731

 736

 736

 728

 718

 707

 695

 684

 674

 670

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,198.13

 1,198.11

 1,198.15

 1,198.20

 1,198.29

 1,198.43

 1,198.74

 1,198.81

 1,198.87

 1,198.90

 1,198.87

 1,198.81

 1,198.89

 1,198.84

 1,198.91

 1,198.87

 1,198.88

 1,198.81

 1,198.73

 1,198.63

 1,198.53

 1,198.45

 1,198.36

 1,198.26

 1,198.14

 1,198.26

 1,198.47

 1,198.59

 204.6

 204.5

 204.7

 204.8

 205.1

 205.5

 206.4

 206.6

 206.8

 206.9

 206.8

 206.6

 206.8

 206.7

 206.9

 206.8

 206.8

 206.6

 206.4

 206.1

 205.8

 205.5

 205.3

 205.0

 204.6

 205.0

 205.6

 205.9

STORAGE

-0.1

-0.1

+0.1

+0.1

+0.3

+0.4

+0.9

+0.2

+0.2

+0.1

-0.1

-0.2

+0.2

-0.1

+0.2

-0.1

+0.0

-0.2

-0.2

-0.3

-0.3

-0.2

-0.3

-0.3

-0.4

+0.4

+0.6

+0.4

CHANGE

184

184

274

304

350

433

673

317

302

257

170

124

332

139

317

154

228

109

95

66

66

95

79

75

38

394

531

391

INFLOW

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

PP

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 200

 200

 201

 200

 200

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 205

 199

OUTLETS

 0

 0

 0

 16

 2

 12

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 2

 0

 0

 11

 3

 3

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .18

 .02

 .14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .04

 .04

 .00

 .00

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2014 WHISKEYTOWN LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 25, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAP.

C.F.S. * FRANCIS

COMPUTED

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1.2 6,681 5,584 0 392 52 .60

ACRE-FEET +1.2 13,252 11,076 0 778 103

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 778

SPILL 0 11,854

 204.7

OUTLET 11,076

TOTAL

JUDGE

CARR PP

(1)

 232

 227

 297

 338

 343

 346

 279

 14

 14

 108

 86

 14

 190

 14

 14

 14

 130

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 39

 48

 31

 2,890

 5,732

FROM

TO

SPRING CR.

TO CLEAR CR.

CLEAR

CR.

NATURAL

FLOW

-48

-43

-23

-34

 7

 87

 394

 303

 288

 149

 84

 110

 142

 125

 303

 140

 98

 95

 81

 52

 52

 81

 65

 61

 24

 355

 483

 360

 3,791

 7,519

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .48

 3.52

 3.54

 .50

 .00

 .00

 .42

 .15

 .04

 .00

 1.16

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .18

 2.40

 1.95

 14.51

PRECIP

INCHES

PRECIPITATION

 14.51

 19.02

THIS MONTH

JULY 1, 2013 TO DATE

Table 5
§ 3602.48 What may BLM require when renewing my contract? ( a ) *Reappraisal.* BLM will not grant a renewal without requiring a reappraisal under § 3602.13.
( b ) *Bond amount and terms.* Before renewing your contract, BLM may require you to increase, or allow you to decrease, the amount of the performance bond you posted under § 3602.14. BLM may also require other bond modifications to ensure coverage for the renewed contract.
( c ) *Environmental protection requirements.* Before renewing your contract, BLM will perform additional environmental analysis as required, and may require you to adopt additional measures to prevent hazards to public health and safety, and to minimize and mitigate environmental damage.
( d ) *Other requirements.* BLM may require additions or changes to other terms or conditions of your contract.
§ 3715.4-3 What if BLM does not concur in my existing use or occupancy? If BLM determines that all or any part of your existing use or occupancy is not reasonably incident: ( a ) BLM may order a suspension or cessation of all or part of the use or occupancy under § 3715.7-1;
( b ) BLM may order the land to be reclaimed to its satisfaction and specify a reasonable time for completion of reclamation under 43 CFR part 3800; and
( c ) BLM may order you to apply within 30 days after the date of notice from BLM for appropriate authorization under the regulations in 43 CFR Group 2900.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40260

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS ARRIAGA-PARDO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CR-218-01

- - - - - - - - - -

September 26, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Luis Arriaga-Pardo appeals the district court’s

decision to allow a trial witness to testify in English about a

conversation that the witness held in Spanish. We find no error

in the district court’s decision. See United States v. Villalta,

662 F.2d 1205, 1206-07 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S.

916 (1982).

AFFIRMED.
### **CHAPTER 21—FEDERAL INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS ACT**

Subchapter
Sec. 1
A.
Tax on employees
3101

B.
Tax on employers
3111
C.
General provisions
3121
D.
Credits
3131

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

Pub. L. 117–2, title IX, §9641(c), Mar. 11, 2021, 135 Stat. 171, added item for subchapter D.

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
§ 4.1192 Contents of answer. The permittee's answer to a show cause order shall contain a statement setting forth— ( a ) The reasons in detail why a pattern of violations does not exist or has not existed, including all reasons for contesting— ( 1 ) The fact of any of the violations alleged by OSM as constituting a pattern of violations;
( 2 ) The willfulness of such violations; or
( 3 ) Whether such violations were caused by the unwarranted failure of the permittee;
( b ) All mitigating factors the permittee believes exist in determining the terms of the revocation or the length and terms of the suspension;
( c ) Any other alleged relevant facts; and
( d ) Whether a hearing on the show cause order is desired.
[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 67 FR 61510, Oct. 1, 2002]
#### § 3715.9 What appeal rights do I have?

If you are adversely affected by a BLM decision, order or determination made under this subpart, you may appeal the decision, order or determination to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA) under the provisions of 43 CFR part 4.
#### In the Matter of Violet Roberts et al., Appellants, against Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
California Department of Fish and Game

Note: Quantities shown below are acre-feet of water

 Source of Level 2 Sources of Incremental

Refuge Level 21 Water Supplies Incremental Level 42 Level 4 Water Supply Total Level 43

Water Supplies Contract Non-Project Water Supplies Contract Replacement Supplies

Volta 10,000 13,00070 6,000 3,0004

3,0008

16,000

Los Banos 16,670 10,470 6,20068,330 8,33040 25,000

Salt Slough 6,680 6,680 0 3,340 3,3404

0 10,020

China Island 6,967 6,967 0 3,483 3,48340 10,450

Mendota 18,500 27,59450 11,150 2,0564

9,0948

29,650

Total 58,817 64,711 6,200632,303 20,2094

12,0948

91,120

1

 Quantity as defined in Article 1(i) of this Contract

2

 Quantity as defined in Article 1(h) of this Contract 

3 Quantity as defined in Article 1(j) of this Contract

4

 To be acquired in accordance with Article 3(a) of this Contract

5 Contract No. 14-06-200-4359A 20,143 ac.ft. (7,000 ac.ft. Section 2---1,143 ac.ft. Schedule 2---12,000 ac.ft. Section 6) 

 Contract No. 14-06-200-8033A 10 ac.ft. M&I

 Contract No. 14-06-200-3342A 4,000 ac.ft. Mitigation (Note: 1,000 ac.ft. allotted to O'Neill Forebay, Contract No. 14-06-200-7451A)

 Contract No. 14-06-200-7859Z 4,441 ac.ft. (3,120 ac.ft.Supplement Water---1,321 ac.ft. Water Rights)

6 Grassland Water District: 2,200 ac.ft.

 San Joaquin River Exchange Contract: 4,000 ac.ft

7

 Provided prior to CVPIA

8

 Provided prior to CVPIA - To be replaced to the Project when available and acquired from willing sources; source of funding to be determined

Shaded Cells: The California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) does not agree that it should be responsible for the incremental cost share 

associated with the acquisition of this water. Reclamation and DFG will seek resolution of this disagreement during the public review period.

DRAFT 11/15/00
#### G. & L. Bottling Works *v.*Macon Coca Cola Bottling Co.

September 22, 1910.

Trover. Before Judge Eelton. Bibb superior court. , August 10, 1909.

*John P. Poss,*for plaintiff in error. *Miller &' Jones,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

None of the grounds of the motion for new trial are sufficient to require a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCrustal Dynamics Project data analysis, 1990The Goddard Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) group reports the results of analyzing 1073 Mark 3 data sets acquired from fixed and mobile observing sites through the end of 1989 and available to the Crustal Dynamics Project. Two large solutions, GLB656 and GLB657, were used to establish a VLBI reference frame with an origin coincident with the ITRF89. Another large solution, GLB658, was used to obtain Earth rotation parameters, nutation offsets, and global source positions. Site velocities were obtained from another large solution, GLB659. A fifth large solution, GLB660, was used to obtain baseline evolution. Site positions are tabulated on a yearly basis from 1979 through 1992. Site velocities are presented in both Cartesian and topocentric coordinates. The results include 76 sources, 80 sites, and 422 baselines.Document ID19910005366Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCaprette, D. S.*(ST Systems Corp. Lanham, MD., United States)*Ma, C.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Ryan, J. W.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryGeophysicsReport/Patent NumberREPT-91E00714NAS 1.15:100765NASA-TM-100765Accession Number91N14679Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910005366.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
AUG-14-2014 08:08 

u.s. Department 

of Tronsportotlon 

Federal Avlcrlion 

Administration 

August 6, 2014 

Mi". Pete Sanderlin 

FAA RENTON 

Vice President and General Manager 

Kalitta Air, Inc. 

818 Willow Run Airport 

Ypsilanti, MI 48198 

Dear Mr. Sanderlin: 

• ·. i : t' 

P.02/03 

Tran!ilport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue. S.W . R~;~nton, Washin9ton 96057·3356 

We have received your March 18,2014, petition for exemption from the requirements of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CPR) 91.9(a), 91.1025(a), 121.135(a)(4), 

121.135(b)(21), and 121.141 related to the requirements for'transporting cargo. 

Your request, which you sent to the Department of Transportation's Federal Document 

Management System (Docket No. F AA-2014-0184) will be processed by this office when 

you provide all necessary information. We request additional information on the following 

subject: 

Provide specific details and justification regarding the ~~public interest~~ needs and "US 

National'' needs in regard to the grant of this exemption. For each specific case, clearly 

define the approximate nwnber of flights and/or time frame, mission requirements (i.e., 

carriage of tall rigid cargo; limited or no frangible cargo), and direct public interest or US 

National interest related to each mission. For example if applicable and appropriate, state 

that granting of this petition will directly support US National interests as it would allow the 

carriage of cargo under contract of the US Department of Defense to remove cargo from 

Afghanistan to support US National interests; this mission would require the transport of 

mostly tall rigid cargo, some number of flights (specify approximate nwnber of flights or 

amount of cargo) for some amount oftime (specify approximate time frame) to support this 

mission. This information will be used to support the FAA's analysis of this exemption 

request. . 
RUG-14-2014 08:08 FRR RENTON 

Should you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, 

please contact Ian Won, at 425-227-2145, or at ian.y.won@FM.gov. 

Sincerely, 

d~A~~~ Manager, Airworthiness/Cabin Safety Branch, ANM-115 

Transport Standards Staff 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service 

cc: 

Mr. John W. Dietrich 

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer 

Atlas Air, Inc. 

2000 Westchester Avenue 

Purchase, New York 10577 

Mr. Dan McHugh 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

Southern Air, Inc. 

117 Glover Avenue 

Norwal~ Connecticut 06850 

Mr. Brian Bauer 

Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer 

World Airways, Inc. 

101 World Drive 

Peachtree City, Georgia 30269~6965 

P.03/03 

2 

TOTRL P.03
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 30 DAY ACCUM MEAN 30 DAY AVG MEAN

1 142 139 141 141 141

2 142 139 140 281 141

3 139 134 136 417 139

4 138 134 136 553 138

5 140 137 139 692 138

6 139 135 137 829 138

7 137 133 135 964 138

8 135 133 134 1,098 137

9 135 133 134 1,232 137

10 135 131 134 1,366 137

11 132 131 131 1,497 136

12 132 129 131 1,628 136

13 129 127 128 1,756 135

14 128 124 126 1,882 134

15 124 119 122 2,004 134

16 119 118 118 2,122 133

17 118 115 117 2,239 132

18 115 113 115 2,354 131

19 114 112 113 2,467 130

20 112 110 111 2,578 129

21 110 109 110 2,688 128

22 109 106 108 2,796 127

23 106 103 104 2,900 126

24 103 102 103 3,003 125

25 104 102 103 3,106 124

26 103 101 102 3,208 123

27 102 99 100 3,308 123

28 100 98 99 3,407 122

29 98 96 97 3,504 121

30 96 95 95 3,599 120

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Vernalis On The San Joaquin River

Period: April 2023 Run Date: 5/9/2023
#### Sidney Reische, Appellant, v. Florence Montgomery, as Executrix of Henry E. Montgomery, Deceased, et al., Respondents, and Edward Reische, Impleaded Defendant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of a fall down a flight of stairs in a building owned by respondents and leased in its entirety to plaintiff’s father, plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of his case. The building was used by plaintiff’s father in the conduct of a wholesale fruit and vegetable business. A railing or bannister to the second floor was constructed in such a manner that for a distance of about thirty-six inches it was flush against a floor beam, so that it could not be grasped. There was proof that as plaintiff was descending the stairs, his heel caught in the brass nosing on a step opposite the point where the rail was against the beam; that because of such construction he was unable to obtain a grip on the bannister; and that he fell to the bottom of the stairs, suffering severe injuries. There was also evidence that prior to the accident the owners had made repairs to various portions of the interior of the premises, although the lease required the tenant to make all interior repairs. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. It was error to dismiss the complaint, as the proof of repairs created an issue of fact as to whether there had been a reservation of a degree of control of the premises by respondents. *(Scudero*v. *Campbell,*288 H. Y. 328; *Antonsen*V. *Bay Ridge Savings Bank,*292 H. Y. 143; *Rosenberg*V. *Kings County Savings Bank,*270 App. Div. 904; *Citron*v. *Kapner,*271 App. Div. 932; *Noble*v. *Marx,*272 App. Div. 670.) Whether the condition of the handrail was a proximate cause of the accident is also a question of fact for the jury. *(Foley*v. *State of New York,*294 H. Y. 275, 280; *Anderson*v. *St. Rose of Lima’s R. G. Church,*240 App. Div. 992.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, voimston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 868.]
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the second amended Annual Report (the "Second Amended Report") on Form 10-K/A of First National Energy Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the "Registrant"), for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, I, Gregory Sheller, as Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Second Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Second Amended Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: April 20, 2011
By:
/s/ Gregory ShellerGregory Sheller


This certification accompanies each Second Amended Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 269

 255

 244

 246

 240

 246

 258

 257

 255

 264

 261

 251

 243

 245

 239

 251

 253

 262

 259

 258

 263

 259

 258

 258

 270

 288

 277

 264

 257

 262

 260

 248

 239

 226

 228

 225

 222

 226

 234

 234

 231

 224

 221

 208

 208

 205

 214

 230

 228

 236

 229

 232

 234

 241

 240

 240

 241

 249

 232

 234

 232

 229

 257

 248

 240

 237

 235

 234

 238

 245

 247

 250

 251

 240

 232

 234

 231

 238

 246

 249

 252

 250

 253

 249

 246

 249

 257

 265

 263

 251

 248

 245

 242

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### Cochran *v.*Jackson.

Fish, C. J.

In an action for damages brought by Cochran against Jackson, the substance of the petition was as follows: The plaintiff and one Maulding were duly elected constables, and the defendant justice of the peace, for the 1422 district *G.*M., Fulton county. All of them duly • qualified, received their commissions, and together entered upon the discharge of the duties of their respective offices. The plaintiff and Maulding held themselves ready at all times to serve summonses, levy executions, and perform all other service and duties required of them as constables under the law, and they alone had the legal right to serve as constables for said district, and were alone entitled to the fees of such office. Notwithstanding this, the defendant soon disregarded the *376rights of the plaintiff and Maulding, as well as the law, and without necessity appointed other persons to act as constables in said district, to the number of twelve or more,.since the plaintiff’s election, and has turned over to them practically the entire business in his court, refusing -to place it in the hands of the plaintiff and Maulding as it was his legal duty to do. The number of eases, civil and criminal, originating in the court wherein the defendant presided, since the plaintiff’s election as constable, was alleged, and the plaintiff’s damage’s were laid in a given sum. Held, that the petition was properly dismissed on demurrer, as it did not appear therefrom that there had been any compliance with' Civil Code, § 4055, providing that “No suit shall be brought against any justice for anything done by him in the execution of his office, until notice in writing shall have been given to him, or left at his usual place of abode, one calendar month.” *Collins*v. *Granniss,*67 *Ga.*710

November 18, 1910.

Damages. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. November 2,9, 1909.

*J. S. James,*for plaintiff. *Moore & Branch,*for defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 30.502 How does a judge resolve conflicts between the anti-lapse provision and the presumption of joint tenancy?

If the presumption of joint tenancy and anti-lapse provisions conflict, then the judge will give priority to the presumption of joint tenancy and the share of the deceased devisee will descend to the surviving devisees.

[86 FR 72093, Dec. 20, 2021]