alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
% Worker exposure 3 weeks, 5 days/week exposure, 14 days no exposure

% February 17, 2016

% Cecilia Tan

% Setting model parameters

use human_parameters_MRP

use preg_female_parameters

BWSW=1;% Set BW to a fixed value

BWST=69; % Set BW for female worker at 69 kg

PREG=0;% Not pregnant

DZONE = 1;% Turn dermal exposure on

KDIS = 0.0;% Daily dissipation

TSTOP=840;%Simulation time = 21 days work week + 14 days no exposure

% Dermal exposure

SAF=1; % Fraction of skin in contact with chlorpyrifos.

FAD=1; % Fraction of dose available to be absorbed. Values of <1 could be used if pesticide is encapsulated.

DERM =3630;% dose in ug/kg

D3=5; %DAYS/WEEK

P2=8; %HRS/DAY

S2=0 ;%OFFSET FROM 0 START TIME (EG IF YOU WANT TO MODEL FROM MIDNIGHT, BUT DOSE AT 8 AM)

W2=21; %21 day exposure

prepare @clear@all

start @NoCallback

simall = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6 _cvo*334.5];%conc unit = ug/L

save simall @file='worker_POD_02172016' @format=ascii
§ 4.1271 Notice of appeal. ( a ) Any aggrieved party may file a notice of appeal from an order or decision of an administrative law judge disposing of a proceeding under §§ 4.1160 through 4.1171, 4.1200 through 4.1205, 4.1260 through 4.1267, 4.1290 through 4.1296, and 4.1350 through 4.1356.
( b ) Except in an expedited review proceeding under § 4.1180, or in a suspension or revocation proceeding under § 4.1190, a notice of appeal shall be filed with the Board on or before 30 days from the date of receipt of the order or decision sought to be reviewed and the time for filing may not be extended.
[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 59 FR 1489, Jan. 11, 1994]
|  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |
|  |  |
|  |  |  |  |
|  |  |

    

**Dr. Jack Whitescarver's Congressional   Appropriations Testimony FY 2005 (PDF)**

**OAR FY 2005 Congressional Budget   Justification (PDF*)**

**Training   and Career Development Workshop on Treatment and Adherence Research for and   by Racial and Ethnic Minorities**

**NIH   Fiscal Year 2005 Plan for HIV-Related Research**   

----

Home | Updates | About OAR | Public Information | Meetings| Web Broadcasts | Minority Initiatives | Links

For additional information pleasecontact OAR Info

 

Last   Update: *6 April, 2004*

If you have any technical difficulties withthis site please contact the site administrator.
Exhibit “3” 

Case 1:20-cv-21964-CMA Document 73-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/13/2020 Page 1 of 2
Total Compensation And Expenses Requested; 

Any Amounts Previously Requested; 

And Total Compensation And Expenses Previously Awarded 

1 The total amount of fees and expenses approved by the Court is the sum of the Amount Previously Awarded and the Hold Back Amou2 The total amount of fees and expenses sought to be approved by the Court in this Application Period is the sum of the Fees (2nd App.)

App.), and Expenses (2nd App.) columns. 

Name Specialty Amount Previously 

Awarded 

Hold Back 

Amount1

Hours Billed 

(2nd App.) 

Fees 

(2nd App.) 

Receiver and 

Genovese Joblove & 

Battista 

General Counsel $426,064.18 $105,272.46 1,814.80 $412,985.88 

Collas Crill 

Special Counsel to 

Receiver in 

Cayman Islands 

$193,907.70 $48,476.92 223.11 $94,713.76 

Yip Associates Forensic Accountants $17,946.40 $4,486.60 344.30 $62,128.80 

Development 

Specialists, Inc. 

Financial Adviser 

and Restructuring 

Consultants 

$118,064.51 $29,497.64 586.40 $189,086.88 

Rehmann Tax and Consulting $28,655.20 $7,163.80 238.9 $46,120.32 

Ehounds, Inc. Electronic Data Management $20,342.40 $5,085.60 -- $7,794.36 

Case 1:20-cv-21964-CMA Document 73-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/13/2020 Page
#### Alfred A. Whitman v. Charles L. Munnich and Others.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### Hannah A. Harris, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, wiih costs. Ho opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton end Putnam, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 47—CERTAIN GROUP HEALTH PLANS**

Sec.
5000.
Certain group health plans.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–239, title VI, §6202(b)(4)(A), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2233, struck out "LARGE" after "CERTAIN" in chapter heading and "large" after "Certain" in item 5000.
#### § 3281.12 Who designates the unit operator?

The owners of geothermal rights and lease interests committed to the unit agreement will nominate a unit operator. Before designating the unit operator, BLM must also determine whether the prospective unit operator meets the requirements of § 3281.11.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEnroute flight planning: The design of cooperative planning systemsDesign concepts and principles to guide in the building of cooperative problem solving systems are being developed and evaluated. In particular, the design of cooperative systems for enroute flight planning is being studied. The investigation involves a three stage process, modeling human performance in existing environments, building cognitive artifacts, and studying the performance of people working in collaboration with these artifacts. The most significant design concepts and principles identified thus far are the principle focus.Document ID19900016648Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSmith, Philip J.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Layton, Chuck*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Mccoy, Elaine*(San Jose State Univ. CA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryAircraft Communications And NavigationReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186797NAS 1.26:186797Accession Number90N25964Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RF PROJ. 767591/722399CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-615Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016648.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 4.470 How to appeal a final BLM grazing decision to an administrative law judge. ( a ) Any applicant, permittee, lessee, or other person whose interest is adversely affected by a final BLM grazing decision may appeal the decision to an administrative law judge within 30 days after receiving it or within 30 days after a proposed decision becomes final as provided in § 4160.3(a) of this title. To do so, the person must file an appeal with the BLM field office that issued the decision and serve a copy of the appeal on any person named in the decision.
( b ) The appeal must state clearly and concisely the reasons why the appellant thinks the BLM grazing decision is wrong.
( c ) Any ground for appeal not included in the appeal is waived. The appellant may not present a waived ground for appeal at the hearing unless permitted or ordered to do so by the administrative law judge.
( d ) Any person who, after proper notification, does not appeal a final BLM grazing decision within the period provided in paragraph (a) of this section may not later challenge the matters adjudicated in the final BLM decision.
( e ) Filing an appeal does not by itself stay the effectiveness of the final BLM decision. To request a stay of the final BLM decision pending appeal, *see* § 4.471.
[68 FR 68770, Dec. 10, 2003]
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4769 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize and modernize the 

registered traveler program of the Transportation Security Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 4, 2022 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize and 

modernize the registered traveler program of the Transportation Security Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Registered Traveler 

5 Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4769 IS

1 SEC. 2. REGISTERED TRAVELER PROGRAM. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 449 of 

3 title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 

4 section 44920 the following: 

5 ‘‘§ 44920a. Registered Traveler Program 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Trans7 portation Security Administration— 

8 ‘‘(1) shall establish and maintain the Registered 

9 Traveler Program; and 

10 ‘‘(2) may issue rules consistent with security re11 quirements established under the Registered Trav12 eler Program airport security plan amendment 

13 issued by the Administration to airports and airlines 

14 to carry out this section. 

15 ‘‘(b) REIMBURSEMENT.— 

16 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator may ac17 cept reimbursement from a private entity operating 

18 under the Registered Traveler Program for actual 

19 expenses incurred by the Administration for staffing, 

20 equipment, and any other resources that are in addi21 tion to the staffing, equipment, and other resources 

22 that are necessary to carry out this section. 

23 ‘‘(2) TREATMENT OF REIMBURSEMENTS.—The 

24 Administrator shall deposit any reimbursement ac25 cepted under subparagraph (A) to the account pro26 viding appropriations to the Administration. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4769 IS

1 ‘‘(c) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this 

2 section may be construed to diminish the authority of the 

3 Administrator under this title to establish and enforce reg4 ulations for transportation security.’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The chapter analysis 

6 for chapter 449 of title 49, Untied States Code, is amend7 ed by inserting after the item relating to section 44920 

8 the following: 

‘‘44920a. Registered Traveler Program.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 3602.45 What final steps will BLM take before issuing me a contract? ( a ) *Ability to perform.* BLM may require you to furnish information we find necessary to determine whether you are able to meet the obligations of the contract.
( b ) *Reasons for denying a contract.* We will deny you the contract, even if you made the highest bid, if— ( 1 ) We determine that you are unable to meet the obligations of the contract,
( 2 ) You are unwilling to accept the terms of the contract, or
( 3 ) BLM rejects all bids.
( c ) *Refund of deposit.* If BLM denies you a contract under paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(3) of this section, we will refund your deposit.
( d ) *Awarding a contract.* BLM will notify you of your contract award by presenting you with or sending you the contract.
( e ) *Accepting a contract.* If BLM awards you the contract, you must, within 60 days after receiving it, sign and return the contract, together with a performance bond and mining and reclamation plan when BLM requires them. BLM may extend this period an additional 30 days if you request it in writing within the first 60-day period. If you fail to sign and return the contract within the first 60-day period, or an approved 30-day extension period, you will forfeit the bid deposit.
( f ) *Awarding the contract to the second-highest bidder.* If BLM determines that you are unable to meet the obligations of the contract, or if you fail to sign and return the contract within the time period specified, BLM may offer and award the contract for the amount of the high bid to the person making the next highest complete bid. That person must be qualified and willing to accept the contract, and must redeposit the amount required under § 3602.44(b).
( g ) *Contract form.* BLM will make all sales on BLM standard contract forms approved by the Director, Bureau of Land Management. We will include as necessary additional provisions and stipulations in the contract to conform to the provisions of the competitive sale notice and to address environmental concerns or other site-specific issues.
Table 27
                                          U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                                 Central Valley Operations Office

                                                 Tehama-Colusa Canal
                                                         2008

Monthly Deliveries in AF

     Water Users        Jan    Feb    Mar    Apr    May    Jun    Jul    Aug    Sep    Oct    Nov    Dec  Total

Colusa County WD          80    165   2887   6914   8653   9048   9553   7545   4126   5523    720    777  55991
Cortina WD                 0      0     35     98    123    169    175    126     74     57      3     20    880
Davis WD                   0      0    107    340    480    508    515    369    229    143     10      7   2708
Dunnigan WD                0      4    425   1673   2744   2716   2683   1957   1058    485    178    237  14160
4-M Water District         0      0     83    426    490    355    340    231    205    124      5      4   2263
GCID                       0      0   3478   3200   4301   6206   3667   3523   1447   1264     12     79  27177
Glenn Valley WD            0      0     19     78    178    300    262    101     37     98      9      0   1082
Glide WD                  79      8     69    652   3429   2221   2246   2211    574     42      6     13  11550
Holthouse WD               0      0     49    127     60      0      0      0      0      0      0      0    236
Kanawha WD                 4     16    644   3148   5932   4685   5287   5232   1609    376     60     46  27039
Kirkwood WD                0      0     11     77    100    117    125    133     71     33      0      0    667
La Grande WD               0      0      3    379   1587   1066   1060    561     52     53      0      0   4761
Myers-Marsh MWC            0      0     32     14      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0     46
Orland-Artois WD           9     11    433   2666   5473   5341   5881   4779   1779   1117     79    265  27833
Westside WD               12      7   1857   4346   7038   6898   5957   3936   1511   1211    254    307  33334

Total                    184    211  10132  24138  40588  39630  37751  30704  12772  10526   1336   1755 209727

*  Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
Exhibit 13.1 CERT IFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Alberta Star Development Corp. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended November 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tim Coupland, Principal Executive and I, Gordon Steblin, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/ s / Tim CouplandTim Coupland, Principal Executive Officer April 9 , 2010   / s / Gordon SteblinGordon Steblin, Principal Financial Officer April   9   , 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10432

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALEJANDRO LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-257-1

Before ELROD, COSTA, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Alejandro Lopez has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 9, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10432 Document: 00515229049 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/09/2019
No. 19-10432

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-10432 Document: 00515229049 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/09/2019
### §3503. Indian tribal energy resource regulation

#### (a) Grants

The Secretary may provide to Indian tribes, on an annual basis, grants for use in accordance with subsection (b).

#### (b) Use of funds

Funds from a grant provided under this section may be used—

(1)(A) by an Indian tribe for the development of a tribal energy resource inventory or tribal energy resource on Indian land;

(B) by an Indian tribe for the development of a feasibility study or other report necessary to the development of energy resources on Indian land;

(C) by an Indian tribe (other than an Indian Tribe in the State of Alaska, except the Metlakatla Indian Community) for—

(i) the development and enforcement of tribal laws (including regulations) relating to tribal energy resource development; and

(ii) the development of technical infrastructure to protect the environment under applicable law; or

(D) by a Native Corporation for the development and implementation of corporate policies and the development of technical infrastructure to protect the environment under applicable law; and

(2) by an Indian tribe for the training of employees that—

(A) are engaged in the development of energy resources on Indian land; or

(B) are responsible for protecting the environment.

#### (c) Other assistance

(1) In carrying out the obligations of the United States under this chapter, the Secretary shall ensure, to the maximum extent practicable and to the extent of available resources, that on the request of an Indian tribe or a tribal energy development organization, the Indian tribe or tribal energy development organization shall have available scientific and technical information and expertise, for use in the regulation, development, and management of energy resources of the Indian tribe on Indian land.

(2) The Secretary may carry out paragraph (1)—

(A) directly, through the use of Federal officials; or

(B) indirectly, by providing financial assistance to an Indian tribe or tribal energy development organization to secure independent assistance.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXVI, §2603, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title V, §503(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 768; amended Pub. L. 115–325, title I, §102, Dec. 18, 2018, 132 Stat. 4447.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3503, Pub. L. 102–486, title XXVI, §2603, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3114; Pub. L. 105–388, §10, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3484, related to promotion of energy resource development and energy vertical integration on Indian reservations, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 109–58.

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 115–325, §102(1), substituted "on the request of an Indian tribe or a tribal energy development organization, the Indian tribe or tribal energy development organization" for "on the request of an Indian tribe, the Indian tribe".

Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 115–325, §102(2), inserted "or tribal energy development organization" after "Indian tribe".
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4636 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permanently bar aliens 

who are ordered removed after failing to appear at a removal proceeding, 

absent exceptional circumstances, from becoming permanent residents 

of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2022 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. CRUZ, and Mrs. 

HYDE-SMITH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permanently bar aliens who are ordered removed after failing 

to appear at a removal proceeding, absent exceptional 

circumstances, from becoming permanent residents of the 

United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asylum Accountability 

5 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4636 IS

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT INELIGIBILITY FOR ADJUSTMENT OF 

2 STATUS AFTER FAILURE TO APPEAR AT RE3 MOVAL PROCEEDING. 

4 Section 240(b)(7) of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a(b)(7)) is amended by striking ‘‘for 

6 a period of 10 years after the date of the entry of the 

7 final order of removal’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General
Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2016,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures Inc.





|Date: April 5, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                    |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
Director

Office of International Aviation

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue

SE

Washington DC 20590

USA

16th July 2013

Reciprocity Statement

This letter is to confirm that the Civil Aviation Directorate within Transport Malta will

grant, on the basis of reciprocity, the US air carriers all rights included in the Air

Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States signed on

the 30th April 2007 and in force since the 30th March 2008.

Yours sincerely,

Ian Falzon

Director General for Civil Aviation