alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. § 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of RF Industries, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Howard F. Hill, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March  9, 2011
/s/ Howard F. HillHoward F. HillChief Executive Officer
# OUTPUT A-2Ba

Schedule A-2BaPage &P of &N
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6588

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BASEM NAJJAR, a/k/a Bassim Najjar, a/k/a

Bassem Najjar, a/k/a Basim Najjar,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.

(8:98-cr-00505-DKC; 8:03-cv-03565-DKC)

Submitted: October 3, 2007 Decided: November 6, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Basem Najjar, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Assistant United

States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Basem Najjar seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Najjar has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Isaac Eskenazi, an infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Gabriel Eskenazi, et al., Respondents, v. Cleartone Theatre Corp., Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### § 3742.2 Recordation of notice of application, offer, permit or lease.

Not less than 90 days prior to the filing of such request for publication, there must have been filed for record in the county office of record for each county in which lands covered thereby are situated, a notice of the filing of the application or offer, or of the issuance of the permit or lease, upon which said request for publication is based. Such notice must set forth the date of the filing of such application or offer or of the issuance of such permit or lease, the name and address of the applicant, offeror, permittee or lessee, and the description of the lands covered by such application, offer, permit or lease, showing the section or sections of the public land surveys which embrace such lands, or, if such lands are unsurveyed, either the section or sections which would probably embrace such lands when the public land surveys are extended to such lands, or a tie by courses and distances to an approved United States mineral monument.
Exhibit 32.2



|               |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 32.2  |  | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (the Issuer).

The
undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 9, 2010
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ THOMAS W. CASEY    
|Name:                |  | Thomas W. Casey        
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
United States Department of the Interior

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 

2800 Cottage Way 

Sacramento, CA 95825-1898 

CGB-3400 

2.2.4.22 

To: All Central Valley Project Water Contractors 

Subject: New Process to Repay Trinity Public Utilities District (PUD) Assessment 

Dear Water Contractor: 

Beginning in March 2007, Reclamation had a process where collections for the Trinity Public 

Utility District (PUD) Assessment were made by water users based on an assessment per acrefoot of water delivered. This assessment was collected from CVP project contractors as a 

separate charge. The accounting for this process was burdensome for both Reclamation and the 

water users. 

Starting with 2024 water rates, Reclamation is taking a different approach which significantly 

streamlines the recovery of the Trinity PUD Assessment and the remittance to Trinity PUD. We 

are beginning a pilot program with Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District to pay the annual amount 

in a lump sum to Reclamation each year and have a corresponding amount credited to them 

through the O&M rates and Water Contractor Accountings of the same year. The Trinity PUD 

rate will be collected from all CVP project contractors through the O&M water marketing cost 

pool. Please do not remit Trinity PUD surcharge after March 1st, 2024. 

Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District will receive a credit against their obligation of O&M in 

exchange for their lump sum payment to cover the Trinity PUD Assessment and an offset will be 

required for all other water users to pay. The amount added to O&M will be assessed based on 

delivered water. This will increase the Water Marketing rate by approximately 15 cents an acrefoot beginning with the 2024 Water Rates. 

If there are any questions, please contact Robert Ward at 916-978-5359 or rward@usbr.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Digitally signed by SABIR 

AHMAD

Date: 2024.01.17 

11:47:42 -08'00'

SABIR

AHMAD

Sabir Ahmad 

Financial Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,426                       0
<SECURITIES>                                    15,691                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,053                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       735                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,023                       0
<PP&E>                                          10,765                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,813                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,503                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,914                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            91                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,615                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,503                       0
<SALES>                                          8,438                  20,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,770                  33,452
<CGS>                                              681                   2,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,725                   8,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,476                  38,935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  72                     212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,239)                (13,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41                     114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,280)                (13,854)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,280)                (13,854)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)                  (1.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)                  (1.54)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1



ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

TO

BANKUNITED FINANCIAL CORPORATION



|1. |  | The name of the Corporation is BankUnited Financial Corporation (the Corporation).
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The amendments adopted amend the Statement of Designation of the Series I Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock of the Corporation.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | a. |  | The second paragraph of the Statement of Designation of the Series I Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock of the Corporation shall provide in its entirety as follows:
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WHEREAS, the Board of Directors
of the Corporation desires to (i) establish a series of the Class A Common Stock, designating such series Series I Class A Common Stock, (ii) allocate 50,000,000 shares of the authorized Class A Common Stock to the Series I Class A
Common Stock, (iii) fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of the shares of the Series I Class A Common Stock, and (iv) fix and determine the conversion rights of the Class B Stock;



| | b. |  | Paragraph (1) of Section I of the Statement of Designation of the Series I Class A Common Stock of the Corporation shall provide in its entirety as follows:
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I. Designation, Allocation
and Rights of Series I Class A Common Stock.



(1) Designation and Allocation. 50,000,000 of the 60,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock authorized by the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation hereby are determined to be and shall be of a series designated as Series I
Class A Common Stock (herein called Series I Class A Stock).



|3. |  | These amendments were duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on March 24, 2004.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. |  | No shareholder action was required to adopt the amendments.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles of Amendment have been executed on behalf of the Corporation by the undersigned on this 24th day of March, 2004.



BANKUNITED FINANCIAL CORPORATIONBy: /s/    Lawrence H. BlumLawrence H. Blum
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO: 20-CV-21770-KMW

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES 

INSURANCE COMPANY; ILLINOIS 

UNION INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SUMMERS FIRE SPRINKLERS, INC.; 

LATITUDE ON THE RIVER 

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

Defendants.

DEFENDANT, LATITUDE ON THE RIVER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.’S

MOTION TO DISMISS, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO STAY

NOW COMES Defendant, Latitude on the River Condominium Association, Inc. (the 

“Association”), by and through undersigned counsel and respectfully moves the Court to dismiss 

this action against it pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which 

relief can be granted, or alternatively stay this action. In support of the Motion, the Association 

relies on the arguments and authorities contained in Defendant, Summers Fire Sprinklers, Inc.’s 

Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, Motion to Stay and Incorporated Memorandum of Law and 

exhibits attached thereto (DE 10), which the Association expressly adopts and incorporates by 

reference herein, to show the Court that the action asserted against the Association fails under 

applicable law. 

Case 1:20-cv-21770-KMW Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2020 Page 1 of 3
WHEREFORE, the Association respectfully requests that the Court dismiss all claims 

against it in this action, or alternatively stay this action, and grant the Association such other and 

further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Dated: August 25, 2020

SIEGFRIED RIVERA

 /s/ Nicholas D. Siegfried 

Nicholas D. Siegfried Esq.

Florida Bar No. 27020

201 Alhambra Circle, 11th Floor

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Tel. (305) 442-3334

Fax (305) 443-3292

E-Mail: nsiegfried@siegfriedrivera.com

 jrodgers@siegfriedrivera.com

 sjohnson@siegfriedrivera.com

Case 1:20-cv-21770-KMW Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2020 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Nicholas D. Siegfried, certify that I served a copy of this on counsel identified below 

via email at the noted addresses on August 25, 2020.

CLYDE & CO US LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Sina Bahadoran (Florida Bar No. 523364)

Junaid N. Savani (Florida Bar No.88816)

1221 Brickell Avenue

Suite 1600

Miami, Florida 33131

E-Mail: sina.bahadoran@clydeco.us;

Junaid.savani@clydeco.us

BOYLE, LEONARD & ANDERSON, P.A.

Attorneys for Summers Fire Sprinklers, Inc.

Mark A. Boyle (Florida Bar No. 005886)

Amanda K. Anderson (Florida Bar No. 

0091297)

2050 McGregor Blvd. 

Fort Myers, Florida 33901

E-Mail: EService@Insurance-Counsel.com; 

MBoyle@Insurance-Counsel.com; 

AAnderson@Insurance-Counsel.com

 /s/ Nicholas D. Siegfried

 Nicholas D. Siegfried

Case 1:20-cv-21770-KMW Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2020 Page 3 of 3
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsActivity Tracking for Pilot Error Detection from Flight DataThis report presents an application of activity tracking for pilot error detection from flight data, and describes issues surrounding such an application. It first describes the Crew Activity Tracking System (CATS), in-flight data collected from the NASA Langley Boeing 757 Airborne Research Integrated Experiment System aircraft, and a model of B757 flight crew activities. It then presents an example of CATS detecting actual in-flight crew errors.Document ID20020079420Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCallantine, Todd J.*(San Jose State Univ. CA United States)*Ashford, RoseDate AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 2002Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberIH-030NAS 1.26:211406NASA/CR-2002-211406Meeting InformationMeeting: 21st European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and ControlLocation: Glasgow, ScotlandCountry: United KingdomStart Date: July 15, 2002End Date: July 16, 2002Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 728-20-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020079420.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4925 

To preserve the readiness of the Armed Forces by limiting separations based 

on COVID–19 vaccination status and continuing pay and benefits for 

members while religious and health accommodations are pending. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Mr. COTTON, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. HOEVEN, and 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To preserve the readiness of the Armed Forces by limiting 

separations based on COVID–19 vaccination status and 

continuing pay and benefits for members while religious 

and health accommodations are pending. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving the Readi5 ness of our Armed Forces Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4925 IS

1 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO PAY AND BENEFITS FOR MEMBERS OF 

2 NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE COMPO3 NENTS WHILE REQUESTS FOR RELIGIOUS 

4 AND HEALTH ACCOMMODATIONS ARE PEND5 ING. 

6 A member of the National Guard or another reserve 

7 component of the Armed Forces shall maintain access to 

8 pay and benefits while a request of the member for a reli9 gious or health accommodation is pending. 

10 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION OF 

11 MEMBERS OF ARMED FORCES BASED ON 

12 COVID–19 VACCINATION STATUS. 

13 A member of an active or reserve component of the 

14 Armed Forces may not be involuntarily separated from the 

15 Armed Forces based solely on the vaccination status of 

16 the member with respect to COVID–19 until the Armed 

17 Forces have achieved the end strengths authorized under 

18 the most recent Act authorizing appropriations for mili19 tary activities of the Department of Defense. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 4.1017 Are ex parte communications allowed? ( a ) Ex parte communications with the ALJ or his or her staff are prohibited in accordance with § 4.27(b).
( b ) This section does not prohibit ex parte inquiries concerning case status or procedural requirements, unless the inquiry involves an area of controversy in the hearing process.
#### Barnes-Fain Company *v.*Thomason *et al.*

January 11, 1911.

Attachment. Before Judge Edwards. Pplk superior court. September 3, 1909.

*Mundy & Mundy,*for plaintiff.

Lumpkin, J.

This ease is controlled by the decision in *Rhode Island Locomotive Works*v. *Empire Lumber Company,*91 *Ga.*639 (17 S. E. 1012), in which the decision in *Steen & Marshall*v. *Harris,*81 *Ga.*681 (8 S. E. 206), is referred to and construed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.*
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sean Y. Fulda, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
UniverCell Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
            ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company for the periods presented therein.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/S/ SEAN Y. FULDA
--------------------
Sean Y. Fulda
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 12, 2004
### §883. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–586, §1, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1295; Pub. L. 98–605, §5, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3168, which related to disposition of the judgment fund of the Osage Tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Excelsior Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Howard Collins Construction Co. Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 4.331 Who may appeal. Any interested party affected by a final administrative action or decision of an official of the Bureau of Indian Affairs issued under regulations in title 25 of the Code of Federal Regulations may appeal to the Board of Indian Appeals, except— ( a ) To the extent that decisions which are subject to appeal to a higher official within the Bureau of Indian Affairs must first be appealed to that official;
( b ) Where the decision has been approved in writing by the Secretary or Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs prior to promulgation; or
( c ) Where otherwise provided by law or regulation.
### PART II—CERTAIN STOCK OPTIONS

Sec.
421.
General rules.
422.
Incentive stock options.
[422A.
Renumbered.]
423.
Employee stock purchase plans.
424.
Definitions and special rules.
[425.
Renumbered.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(b)(6), (c)(9)(A)(ii), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–522, 1388–524, struck out items 422 "Qualified stock options" and 424 "Restricted stock options" and redesignated items 422A and 425 as 422 and 424, respectively.

**1981**—Pub. L. 97–34, title II, §251(b)(6), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 259, added item 422A.

**1964**—Pub. L. 88–272, title II, §221(a), Feb. 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 63, substituted "CERTAIN STOCK OPTIONS" for "MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS" in part II heading, and "General rules" for "Employee stock options" in item 421, and added items 422–425.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondents

v.

JOHN LEWIS GERHOLT, SR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 44 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2023, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.