alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Stephen D. Barnhill, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Health Discovery Corporation (the “Registrant”);





2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:





a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;





5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Date:  March 31, 2010

/s/ Stephen D. Barnhill, M.D.Stephen D. Barnhill, M.D.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
S a c r a m e n t o

R i v

e r

CCOOLLUUSSAA CCOO

7 8 9

17

20

18

30

19

28

16

29

21

25

24

31 32 33

13

12

36

0

99.2 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-2401A-R-1

Exhibit B

Carter Mutual Water Company

725-202-14

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.25 0.5

Miles

Date: October 29, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\carter_mwc\carter.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Dwight Coleman, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 57824;

First District (5th Division) —

July 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

ENGLISH, J., took no part.

*253Paul Bradley, of Defender Project, of Chicago, (Martin Carlson, of counsel,) for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, for the People.
### §1011. Adjusted basis for determining gain or loss

#### (a) General rule

The adjusted basis for determining the gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property, whenever acquired, shall be the basis (determined under section 1012 or other applicable sections of this subchapter and subchapters C (relating to corporate distributions and adjustments), K (relating to partners and partnerships), and P (relating to capital gains and losses)), adjusted as provided in section 1016.

#### (b) Bargain sale to a charitable organization

If a deduction is allowable under section 170 (relating to charitable contributions) by reason of a sale, then the adjusted basis for determining the gain from such sale shall be that portion of the adjusted basis which bears the same ratio to the adjusted basis as the amount realized bears to the fair market value of the property.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 296; Pub. L. 91–172, title II, §201(f), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 564.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1969—Pub. L. 91–172 redesignated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1969 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–172 applicable with respect to sales made after Dec. 19, 1969, see section 201(g)(6) of Pub. L. 91–172, set out as a note under section 170 of this title.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
Form S-8 of our report dated March 29, 2005, except for note 20, as to which the
date is June 20, 2005, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of AIXTRON AG
for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche GmbH
    Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft
-----------------------------------
Deloitte & Touche GmbH
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft

Hanover, Germany

May 10, 2006
### §965. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 87–235, §5, Sept. 14, 1961, 75 Stat. 509, which provided that no funds distributed under Pub. L. 87–235 be subject to any liens, debts, or claims against the tribe or members thereof except delinquent debts owed by the tribe to the United States or owed by members of the tribe to the tribe or to the United States, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of EV Innovations, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Holly Roseberry, Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Stacey FlingStacey
      FlingChief
      Executive Officer and
                Principal
      Financial Officer


November
10, 2009
#### § 3420.1-1 Lands subject to evaluation for leasing.

All lands subject to coal leasing under the mineral leasing laws are subject to evaluation under this subpart (43 CFR 3400.2).

[44 FR 42615, July 19, 1979. Redesignated at 47 FR 33136, July 30, 1982]
#### § 3263.14 May BLM require me to abandon a well?

If we determine that your well is no longer needed for geothermal resource production, injection, or monitoring, or if we determine that the well is not mechanically sound, BLM may order you to abandon the well. In either case, if you disagree you may explain to us why the well should not be abandoned. We will consider your reasons before we issue any final order.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo AGUILAR-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40094.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Ricardo Aguilar-Hernandez (Aguilar), has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Aguilar has filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw in which he requests the appointment of replacement counsel. Our independent review of the brief, Aguilar’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, Aguilar’s motion for appointment of replacement counsel is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Felder *v.*The State.

October 11, 1910.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Whipple. Wilcox superior court. May *26,*1910.

Beck, J.

1. Under the evidence in this case the jury would have been authorized to find that in discharging the gun which killed the deceased, who was one of a numerous party in a house, the defendant did not intentionally fire at or towards the house where the party was assembled, and was therefore not in the category of one who is guilty of murder because he wilfully and recklessly shoots into a crowd under such circumstances that the law implies malice from the reckless character of the act in case a person in the crowd is killed; and therefore the court should have given to the jury the benefit of the theory that the defendant did an act in itself lawful but without due caution and circumspection, by charging the law of- involuntary manslaughter in the commission of. a lawful act without due caution and circumspection.

2. Except in failing to charge the law of involuntary manslaughter, and in certain charges which precluded the consideration of the question as to whether the accused was guilty of that offense, no error appears in the charges of the court complained of.

*Judgment reversed.*

*A ll the Justices concur.*

*221
      *■M. B. Cannon*and *Hal Lawson,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. A. Hall, attorney-general,*and *Walter F. George, solicitor-general,*contra.
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:04:53 AM (U TC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

To: 'gordon.tosh@liebherr.com'

Cc: AS_Waiver_Requests; Adin, Lucas

Subject: Questions pertaining to Liebherr's September 27, 2013 waiver request for your all-refrigerator

models RB1420 and R1420

Gordon,

We had a couple of questions pertianing to Liebherrs's September 27, 2013 waiver request (see

attached) for your all

‐ refrigerator models RB1420 and R1420:

1. We observed in the product literature that these units specify the availability of a "side

‐ by

‐ side kit"

for use in certain installations. Please describe the function of this kit and any energy consumption by

the components of the kit or expected impact on energy consumption of the refrigerator and freezer

cabinets resulting from use of the kit.

2. Please indicate whether the control board of the freezer is located within the refrigerated space of

the freezer and whether it consumes additional energy while it is operating and connected to the

refrigerator compared with its operation while not connected to the refrigerator.

Thanks,

Bryan Berringer

(202) 586

‐ 0371
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregorio VILLEGAS-CRUZ, also known as Santiago Sosa-Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40093.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 7, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gregorio Villegas-Cruz (Villegas) appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 *883S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Ville-gas’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Villegas contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Villegas properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Villegas also argues that the district court reversibly erred under *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), by sentencing him pursuant to a mandatory application of the Sentencing Guidelines. The Government concedes that Villegas has preserved this issue for appeal. The Government, however, has not shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was harmless. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir.2005). Accordingly, Ville-gas’s sentence is vacated, and this case is remanded for resentencing.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



Exhibit 32.4 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in
his capacity as an officer of Emmis Operating Company (the Company), that, to
his knowledge: (1) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended February 28, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: May 14, 2004 /s/
    
    WALTER Z. BERGERWalter Z. BergerExecutive Vice President, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer
 12
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                            FORM 10-Q
                                          QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997



                               PRESS RELEASE

                        BUCYRUS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                              (NASDAQ:  BCYR)
                           FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


                         EARLY TERMINATION BY THE
                         FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION



   South Milwaukee, Wisconsin, August 6, 1997... Bucyrus International, Inc.
today reported that on August 5, 1997 the Federal Trade Commission has granted
early termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976.  This enables the Company to complete its previously
announced acquisition of the assets of the Marion Power Shovel Company and the
assets of certain related businesses from Global Industrial Technologies, Inc. 
The closing of the transaction is expected within 15 business days.



   Bucyrus International, Inc. is a leading manufacturer of surface mining
equipment.




Contact: Daniel J. Smoke, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 414-
         768-5371, or Craig R. Mackus, Secretary and Controller, 414-768-
         4267.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 546

 541

 535

 548

 536

 538

 562

 553

 556

 581

 589

 576

 555

 540

 555

 542

 557

 541

 546

 527

 523

 504

 510

 499

 488

 478

 478

 471

 463

 448

 441

 472

 400

 468

 470

 469

 468

 468

 469

 468

 473

 476

 478

 491

 489

 488

 483

 484

 482

 478

 473

 471

 463

 456

 451

 446

 440

 437

 426

 427

 422

 416

 503

 496

 496

 496

 493

 495

 506

 508

 506

 514

 519

 521

 520

 517

 517

 514

 512

 505

 504

 498

 494

 484

 478

 468

 464

 457

 454

 448

 442

 433

 427

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 3, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### Patricia Hardy, an Infant, by Mary E. Hardy, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Kenneth G. Fish, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
§ 3501.17 Are there any general planning or environmental considerations that affect issuance of my permit or lease? ( a ) BLM will not issue you a permit or lease unless it conforms with the decisions, terms and conditions of an applicable comprehensive land use plan.
( b ) BLM or the surface management agency will comply with any applicable environmental requirements before issuing you a permit or lease. This may result in conditions on your permit or lease.
( c ) BLM will issue permits and leases consistent with any unsuitability designation under part 1600 of this title.
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10985.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10985.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
§ 3192.16 How will I know if BLM intends to terminate my agreement? ( a ) If BLM intends to terminate your agreement because you did not carry out the terms of the agreement, BLM must send you a notice that lists the reason(s) why BLM intends to terminate the agreement.
( b ) Within 30 days after receiving the notice, you must send BLM a plan to correct the problem(s) BLM listed in the notice. BLM has 30 days to approve or disapprove the plan, in writing.
( c ) If BLM approves the plan, you have 30 days after you receive notice of the approval to correct the problem(s).
( d ) If you have not corrected the problem within 30 days, BLM will send you a second written termination notice that will give you another opportunity to correct the problem.
( e ) If the problem is not corrected within 60 days after you receive the second notice, BLM will terminate the agreement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         5,854
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  107,820
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             113,674
<PP&E>                                       156,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                12,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               262,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         13,030
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       9,130
<OTHER-SE>                                   239,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 262,098
<SALES>                                      214,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             214,444
<CGS>                                         30,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 30,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,672
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (1,173)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9,845
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .002
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .001


</TABLE>
### §975. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 87–629, §5, Sept. 5, 1962, 76 Stat. 430, which related to land surveys and execution of conveyances by the Secretary of the Interior, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**~;**

# I j 

# I

1 I I I Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject:

Dear Mr. Faulk, Gwen Arce <gwennie1960@yahoo.com> Tuesday, November 19, 2013 7:07 PM Faulk, Scott (OST) Makani Kai

Myname is SandraArce-English and I have hadthe opprotunity to use Makani Kai to fly downto Kalaupapa in July. Ithas been a long time since I have gone to Kalaupapabecause at one point there was another airline that was servicing Kalaupapa and Ijustcouldnt afford the very high cost ofthe fare. When Makani Kai started tofly in early part ofthe year and found outthe rates, I was so happy. I could afford it! I failed to mention why I go down to Kalaupapa is because my husband works for the National Park Service and I get to visit onthe weekend. Makani Kai is a great airline with great People that work there andthere is a choice ofseveral flights a day that helps alot and not to mention again the rates that I can afford! I am sure that eventhe patients there are happy withthe serivice and affordable fares. I hope that they will take the time to let you know too!! Please allowMakani Kai to be the only air service to Kalaupapa to service our needs of "topside" Molokai as well as the wonderful people ofKalaupapa. Thank You in advance. SandraArce-English P.O. Box497 Hoolehua, Molokai 96729

1
#### Alice M. Lamb, Appellant, v. Steeplechase Park Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ.