alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Úřední věstník C 219I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 219I |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 633. července 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 219I

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 633. července 2020

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informace |
| | INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE |
| | Evropská komise |
| 2020/C 219 I/01 | Oznámení o odložení použitelnosti ustanovení o otevřeném přístupu týkajících se derivátů obchodovaných v obchodním systému, jež stanoví nařízení MiFIR | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

2020/C 219 I/01

Oznámení o odložení použitelnosti ustanovení o otevřeném přístupu týkajících se derivátů obchodovaných v obchodním systému, jež stanoví nařízení MiFIR

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

IV Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

| 3.7.2020 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CI 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2020

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CI 219/1

---

Oznámení o odložení použitelnosti ustanovení o otevřeném přístupu týkajících se derivátů obchodovaných v obchodním systému, jež stanoví nařízení MiFIR

(2020/C 219 I/01)

Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) č. 600/2014 (1) o trzích finančních nástrojů („nařízení MiFIR“) stanoví ve svém čl. 54 odst. 2 přechodné období, během něhož se článek 35 či 36 nařízení MiFIR nepoužije na ty ústřední protistrany nebo obchodní systémy, které požádaly o využití tohoto přechodného opatření ve vztahu k derivátům obchodovaným v obchodním systému.

Toto přechodné období skončí dne 3. července 2020. Současné tržní prostředí s vysokou mírou nejistoty a volatility způsobenou pandemií COVID-19 zvyšuje provozní rizika ústředních protistran a obchodních systémů. Vzhledem ke zvýšenému riziku je nutné věnovat více pozornosti zachování činnosti, a posuzování žádostí o přístup může mít v současném prostředí negativní důsledky pro řádné fungování trhů při obchodování s deriváty obchodovanými v obchodním systému a provádění jejich clearingu. Spolunormotvůrci se proto dohodli na prodloužení uvedeného přechodného období do 3. července 2021.

Účastníci trhu by tudíž měli vzít na vědomí, že se spolunormotvůrci dohodli na prodloužení přechodných opatření v čl. 54 odst. 2 týkajících se článku 35 či 36 nařízení MiFIR s účinností ode dne 4. července 2020. Toto prodloužení se použije na ty ústřední protistrany nebo obchodní systémy, které své příslušné orgány požádaly o využití přechodných opatření ve vztahu k derivátům obchodovaným v obchodním systému.

---

(1)  Úř. věst. L 173, 12.6.2014, s. 84.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the accompanying Amendment to theAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB of Coast Bancorp for the year ended December 31,2006, I, Karan C. Pohl, Chief Financial Officer of Coast Bancorp, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

(1)           suchAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB of Coast Bancorp for the year ended December 31,2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           theinformation contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Coast Bancorp forthe year ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Coast Bancorp.

Dated:  April18, 2007 
|        | /s/ Karan C. Pohl             |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | KARAN C. POHL                 |
|   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
#### Anna L. Wann, as Surviving Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. Pauline Hoppenstedt, Individually and as Executrix, etc., Impleaded with Louis H. Amy and Another, Composing the Firm, etc., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiff to withdraw demurrer and to answer on payment of costs in this court and in the court below. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 28, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30796

DANNY M. FRILOUX, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(01-CV-2041)

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Friloux challenges the termination of his long-term disability benefits after he received the benefits for several months during 2000, claiming: (1) the district court failed to give enough weigh t to the Social Security Administration’s finding of disability; (2) the district court erred in applying the “national economy” employment standard; and (3) the evidence in the record2

demonstrates that UNUM abused its discretion by discontinuing the benefits. Friloux conceded at oral argument that the plan provides that the “national economy” standard shall be used. In any event, having heard oral a rgument, having reviewed the briefs and pertinent parts of the record, and essentially for the reasons stated by the district court, the discontinuance of benefits is

AFFIRMED.
### §733. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–89, title II, §203, Aug. 18, 1987, 101 Stat. 670, which related to restoration of Federal trust relationship between the United States and the tribe, restoration of rights and privileges of the tribe and its members, and eligibility of the tribe and its members for Federal benefits and services, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
| Name                                                     |   | % Owned |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|--------|
| Global                Electric, Corp.                    |   |         | 67.57  | % |
| R                Electric Car, Co.                       |   |         | 67.57  | % |
| Solium                Power, Corp.                       |   |         | 67.57  | % |
| Hybrid                Technologies USA Distributing Inc. |   |         | 100.00 | % |
| Hybrid                Electric Vehicles India Pvt. Ltd.  |   |         | 100.00 | % |

----
##

#

#

#

#

# #

#

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T34N

T35N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

Cora

Merna

Daniel

Boulder

Pinedale

LaBarge

Marbleton

Big Piney

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

# Unoccupied Greater Sage Grouse Leks

Occupied Greater Sage-Grouse lek 1/4 mile No Surface Occupancy

Occupied Greater Sage-Grouse lek 2 mile Seasonal Stipulation

Greater Sage-Grouse Nesting

and Brood Rearing Habitats

Map 2-6

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Alternative 1
## United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________
No. 07-1973

___________ Gary L. Snyder, *

* Appellant, *

* v. *

* Janice Snyder, Individually and * Personally; Arapahoe County Sheriff’s * Office, Multiple John and Jane Doe * Sheriff Deputies, (Each Individually * and Personally); Arapahoe County * Appeal from the United States Social Services, Colorado; Jefferson * District Court for the County Social Services, Colorado; * District of Minnesota. Kathleen Curley, (Individually and * Personally); Ingrid Holmes, * [UNPUBLISHED] (Individually and Personally); Mardi * A. Ewing, (Individually and * Personally); Linda Froehler, * (Individually and Personally); Linda * Gibson-Hendrick, (Individually and * Personally); Charles D. Moon, * (Individually and Personally); Katie * Smith, (Individually and * Personally); Stephanie Simpson, * (Individually and Personally); Eileen * Wiseman, (Individually and * Personally); John Doe Process * Service Company, Colorado * (Individually and Personally and in its * Business Capacity); Orbitz Couriers; * Douglas County Sheriff’s Office, * Multiple John and Jane Doe Sheriff *1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United Stat es District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2- Deputies, (Each Individually and * Personally); Jennifer Gening, RN * (Individually and Personally); Douglas * County, Minnesota, (In Its * Governmental Capacity); Jeffry * Rustand, (Individually and * Personally); Sherburne County Social * Services, Minnesota; Mary Patton, * (Individually and Personally); Jeffrey * Scott Snyder, (Individually and * Personally; For Jurisdiction Only); * Barry Brooks Snyder, (Individually * and Personally; For Jurisdiction * Only); Kevin Grant Snyder, * (Individually and Personally; For * Jurisdiction Only), *

* Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 25, 2008 Filed: December 2, 2008

___________ Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________
PER CURIAM.

Gary Snyder appeals the district court’s 1 adverse judgment disposing of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review, we have found no basis for reversal and therefore affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
### §699. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 733, §9, 68 Stat. 726, which related to taxation of property distributed under this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3425.1-8 Rejection of applications. ( a ) An application for a lease shall be rejected in total or in part if the authorized officer determines that: ( 1 ) The application is not consistent with the applicable regulations;
( 2 ) issuance of the lease would compromise the regional leasing process described in § 3420.3 of this title; or
( 3 ) leasing of the lands covered by the application, for environmental or other sufficient reasons, would be contrary to the public interest.
( b ) Any application subject to rejection under paragraph (a) of this section shall not be rejected until the applicant is given written notice of the opportunity to provide requested missing information and fails to do so within the time specified in the decision issued for that purpose.
( c ) The authorized officer shall transmit reasonable notice of the rejection of an emergency lease application to the Governor of the affected State(s).
[44 FR 42615, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33141, July 30, 1982; 48 FR 37655, Aug. 19, 1983]
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


OF ALTERRA CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment No.  2”) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Alterra Capital Holdings Limited (the “Issuer”).


I, W. Marston Becker, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that:


(i) the Amendment No. 2 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and


(ii) the information contained in the Amendment No. 2 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: May 10, 2013








/s/ W. Marston BeckerName:W. Marston BeckerTitle:Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     JACKAL INDUSTRIES, INC.  March 31, 1997 financial statements and is 
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894538
<NAME>                        JACKAL INDUSTRIES, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### Margaret M. Carroll and Others, Appellants, v. Henry J. Pierron, as Executor, etc., and Others, Impleaded with Winant B. Wardell and Others, Respondents.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
### §694. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 733, §4, 68 Stat. 725, which related to personal property rights of each member upon publication of roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
```

[108th Congress Private Law 6]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl006.108]

[[Page 1]]

Private Law 108-6
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 For the relief of Tanya Andrea Goudeau. <<NOTE: Dec. 23, 2004 -  [H.R. 
                                 530]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR TANYA ANDREA GOUDEAU.

    (a) In General.--Tanya Andrea Goudeau shall be classified as a child 
under section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act for 
purposes of approval of a relative visa petition filed under section 204 
of such Act by her adoptive parent and the filing of an application for 
an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Tanya Andrea Goudeau enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the petition and the application for 
issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of 
status are filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Tanya Andrea Goudeau, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for 
the current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level of 
family-sponsored immigrants under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Tanya Andrea 
Goudeau shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR CITIZENSHIP.

    For purposes of section 320 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
Tanya Andrea Goudeau shall be considered to have satisfied

[[Page 2]]

the requirements applicable to adopted children under section 101(b)(1) 
of such Act.

    Approved December 23, 2004.
```
(No. 1183

Claimant awarded $411.76.)

#### Frank Channing, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 26, 1927.*

*Quarantine*— when *State not liable for animals destroyed.*The State is not liable for the slaughter of cattle affected with contagious or infectious disease, unless claimant complies with the provisions of the statute providing for such compensation.

Equity and good *conscience*— award *may be made to reimburse.*Where claimant is without fault on his part in the shipment of diseased cattle, an award upon equitable grounds may be made to reimburse him for the difference between the amount he received for the cattle as salvage and the appraised value thereof.

Schuyler, Ettleson *&*Weinfeld, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Merrill F. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim filed by Frank Channing to recover the sum of $411.76, under paragraph 94, chapter 8, Smith-Hurd’s Illinois Revised statutes, 1925, which provides remuneration to the owner for cattle destroyed pursuant to the provisions of an act for the eradication of bovine tuberculosis. The declaration alleges that on December 18, 1925, at Hampshire, Illinois, claimant was the sole owner of a herd of 27 cattle, *431which at claimant’s request was given a tuberculin test by the Division of Animal Industry of the Department of Agriculture of the State of Illinois; that on said date, December 18, 1925, the herd so tested reacted; that on January 8, 1926, claimant ordered from the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad Company’s agent at Hampshire, Illinois, one 40 foot car for the purpose of shipping said 27 reactors immediately to the city of Chicago; that said car was not furnished to him until January 14, 1926; that claimant had said cattle ready for shipment on January 14, 1926, and was ready and willing to ship same, but was unable to do so because said railroad company refused to move said car until January 18, 1926; that said cattle were appraised and slaughtered on January 20, 1926; that the appraisal value was the sum of $2,225.00; that the cattle were sold as salvage for the sum of $989.71; that of the balance of $1,235.29 under the statute, if this claim is allowable, the State of Illinois is liable in the sum of $411.76.

The claim was submitted to Honorable S. J. Stanard, Director of the Department of Agriculture, for investigation and report, who reports that the cattle were not shipped within the thirty days allowed by statute and hence the claim could not be allowed by his department.

Looking at this claim from an equitable point of view, we believe that claimant should he reimbursed. The delay in the shipment of the cattle was due to no fault of his. We accordingly award claimant the sum of $411.76.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Core tests and test wells, Oumalik area, Alaska, with 
Paleontology of test wells and core tests in the Oumalik area, Alaska

#### Professional Paper 305-A

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS 
  | Dublin 
  Core

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp305A 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:36
#### § 3210.16 How must I prevent drainage of geothermal resources from my lease?

You must prevent the drainage of geothermal resources from your lease by diligently drilling and producing wells that protect the Federal geothermal resource from loss caused by production from other properties.
377 P.2d 962

#### Cletus A. WENDLER, Petitioner, v. The FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SANTA FE COUNTY, Santa Fe, New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 19 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Feb. 1, 1963.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the request for free process be and the same is hereby granted and the petition for writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied for the reason that the petition is untimely in view of the services being rendered in the district court by petitioner’s court appointed attorney, Mr. William Gilbert.