alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 3217.11 What are communitization agreements?

Under communitization agreements (also called drilling agreements), operators who cannot independently develop separate tracts due to well-spacing or well development programs may cooperatively develop such tracts. Lessees may ask BLM to approve a communitization agreement or, in some cases, we may require the lessees to enter into such an agreement.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 725

 724

 740

 731

 670

 641

 612

 622

 641

 629

 630

 632

 598

 585

 570

 599

 595

 596

 573

 522

 529

 537

 522

 519

 527

 524

 542

 578

 563

 559

 544

 639

 673

 669

 673

 608

 587

 572

 599

 597

 598

 598

 579

 560

 547

 536

 538

 547

 552

 513

 469

 495

 496

 474

 484

 483

 497

 512

 527

 543

 525

 508

 674

 699

 710

 704

 629

 619

 596

 612

 629

 609

 620

 609

 572

 570

 560

 560

 581

 578

 534

 493

 510

 518

 497

 504

 502

 507

 528

 555

 553

 539

 522

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
§ 3582.2-1 Boundary maps. The areas subject to the regulations in this subpart are those areas of lands and water which are shown on the following maps on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Director of the National Park Service and in the Superintendent's office of each area. The boundaries of these areas may be revised by the Secretary as authorized in the Acts cited under § 3500.0-3(c)(3) of this title. ( a ) Lake Mead National Recreation Area—the map identified as “boundary map 8360—80013A, revised December 1979.”
( b ) Whiskeytown Unit of the Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity National Recreation Area—the map identified as “Proposed Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity National Recreation Area,” numbered BOR-WST 1004, dated July 1963.
( c ) Ross Lake and Lake Chelan National Recreation Areas—the map identified as “Proposed Management Units. North Cascades, Washington,” numbered NP-CAS—7002, dated October 1967.
( d ) Glen Canyon National Recreation Area—the map identified as “Boundary Map Glen Canyon National Recreation Area,” numbered GLC—91,006, dated August 1972.
[51 FR 15213, Apr. 22, 1986; 51 FR 25204, July 11, 1986]
#### § 2655.0-3 Authority.

Section 3(e)(1) of the Act provides that the Secretary shall determine the smallest practicable tract enclosing land actually used in connection with the administration of Federal installations in Alaska.
DERRICK CAMPBELL, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Miami Division 

Case Number: 20-21919-CIV-MORENO 

CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, AND THREE 

UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS, in their 

individual capacities, 

Defendants. 

I ------------------

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO 

DISMISS 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 28, 30), filed on 

June 29, 2020 and July 8, 2020. 

THE COURT has considered the motion, the response in opposition, the reply pertinent portions 

of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is 

ADJUDGED that the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court dismisses 

Count 7 and Count 8 against the City of Miami Gardens for failure to state a claim for the reasons stated in 

open court. See Monell v. Dep't of Soc. Servs. of City'of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978). The Court also 

denies qualified immunity without prejudice to be raised at later stage in the litigation, once the facts are 

further developed, for the reasons stated in open court. The motion to dismiss is denied on the remaining 

Counts. 

12 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Flor~ci f of February 2021. 

FE~MORENO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies furnished to: 

Counsel of Record 

Case 1:20-cv-21919-FAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2021 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, W. Russell Scheirman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: August 9, 2006
### **Subchapter A—Place and Due Date for Payment of Tax**

Sec.
6151.
Time and place for paying tax shown on returns.
[6152 to 6154. Repealed.]
6155.
Payment on notice and demand.
[6156.
Repealed.]
6157.
Payment of Federal unemployment tax on quarterly or other time period basis.
[6158.
Repealed.]
6159.
Agreements for payment of tax liability in installments.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §867(b)(2), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1622, struck out item 6156 "Installment payments of tax on use of highway motor vehicles".

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(b)(13), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–522, struck out item 6158 "Installment payment of tax attributable to divestitures pursuant to Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970".

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–647, title VI, §6234(b)(2), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3736, added item 6159.

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10301(b)(7), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–429, struck out item 6154 "Installment payments of estimated income tax by corporations".

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XIV, §1404(c)(4), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2714, struck out item 6152 "Installment payments".

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §412(c)(3), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 793, struck out item 6153 "Installment payments of estimated income tax by individuals".

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–248, title II, §280(c)(2)(F), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 564, struck out "and civil aircraft" after "motor vehicles" in item 6156.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–452, §3(c)(1), Oct. 2, 1976, 90 Stat. 1514, added item 6158.

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–258, title II, §206(d)(3), May 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 246, inserted "and civil aircraft" in item 6156.

**1969**—Pub. L. 91–53, §2(f)(1), Aug. 7, 1969, 83 Stat. 93, substituted "Payment of Federal unemployment tax on quarterly or other time period basis" for "Payment of taxes under provisions of the Tariff Act" in item 6157.

**1961**—Pub. L. 87–61, title II, §203(c)(3), June 29, 1961, 75 Stat. 126, added item 6156 and redesignated former item 6156 as 6157.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul Chung, Chief Financial Officer and a
director of Geocom Resources Inc. (Principal Financial Officer), hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A
of Geocom Resources Inc. for the interim period ended June 30, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Geocom Resources Inc.

Dated: November 14, 2007



/s/ Paul Chung Paul Chung Chief Financial
Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Argentex Mining
Corporation and will be retained by Argentex Mining Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 99.2


                                 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned, the trustee (the "Trustee") in respect of the Trust
Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2001-1, hereby certifies to Bear Stearns Depositor
Inc. as follows:

     1.   I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on
          Form 8-K filed by U.S. Bank Trust National Association, solely as
          Trustee for the Trust Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2001-1 Trust and
          any distribution reports filed in respect of the Trust during the
          2004 calendar year;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by the
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the depositor by the Trustee under the
          trust agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in such
          reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Trustee under the trust agreement and based on my knowledge, except
          as disclosed in these reports, the Trustee has fulfilled its
          obligations under the trust agreement.

                           U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL
                           ASSOCIATION



                           By: /s/ Thomas E. Tabor
                           ---------------------
                           Name:    Thomas E. Tabor
                           Title:   Vice President
                           Date:    March 28, 2005
### §713c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 98–165, §5, Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1065, which related to Interim Council to be the governing body of the tribe until the tribal governing body established in accordance with section 713d of this title would first convene, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Clotilde R. Keller and Another, as Executors and Trustees, etc., Appellants, v. Hugo P. Keller, Individually and as Surviving Member of the Firm of L. H. Keller & Co., etc., Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### The Huguenot National Bank of New Paltz, Respondent, *v.*Alexander Studwell et al., Appellants.

On the appointment of a receiver of a manufacturing company, the corporation is so far dissolved that thereafter the duty is no longer upon the trustees to make the annual report.

Accordingly *held,*where a receiver was appointed during and before the expiration of the twenty days in which the trustees were required to make such report, that they were not liable to the penalty imposed by the general manufacturing act (§ 12, chap. 40, Laws of 1848) for failure to make and file the same.

(Argued May 30, 1878;

decided November 12, 1878.)

*Samuel Hand*for appellants.

*JST. H Halbert*for respondent.

*Per Curiam*

opinion for reversal and new trial.

All concur, except Miller, J., absent at argument, and Folger, J., dissenting.

Judgment reversed.
### Subpart A—General Rule

Sec.
401.
Qualified pension, profit-sharing, and stock bonus plans.
402.
Taxability of beneficiary of employees' trust.
402A.
Optional treatment of elective deferrals as Roth contributions.
403.
Taxation of employee annuities.
404.
Deduction for contributions of an employer to an employees' trust or annuity plan and compensation under a deferred-payment plan.
404A.
Deduction for certain foreign deferred compensation plans.
[405.
Repealed.]
406.
Employees of foreign affiliates covered by section 3121(l) agreements.
407.
Certain employees of domestic subsidiaries engaged in business outside the United States.
408.
Individual retirement accounts.
408A.
Roth IRAs.
409.
Qualifications for tax credit employee stock ownership plans.
409A.
Inclusion in gross income of deferred compensation under nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §885(c), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1640, added item 409A.

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–16, title VI, §617(e)(2), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 106, added item 402A.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title III, §302(e), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 829, added item 408A.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1899A(70), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2963, substituted "Qualifications" for "Qualification" in item 409.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §491(d)(54), (e)(10), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 852, 853, struck out items 405 and 409, which read "Qualified bond purchase plans" and "Retirement bonds", respectively, and redesignated item 409A as 409.

**1983**—Pub. L. 98–21, title III, §321(e)(2)(D)(ii), Apr. 20, 1983, 97 Stat. 120, substituted "Employees of foreign affiliates covered by section 3121(l) agreements" for "Certain employees of foreign subsidiaries" in item 406.

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–603, §2(d)(1), Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3510, added item 404A.

Pub. L. 96–222, title I, §101(a)(7)(L)(v)(VIII), Apr. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 200, substituted "tax credit employee stock ownership plans" for "ESOPS" in item 409A.

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–600, title I, §141(f)(8), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2795, added item 409A.

**1974**—Pub. L. 93–406, title II, §1016(b)(1), Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 932, inserted heading "Subpart A—General Rule" and added analysis of subparts.

Pub. L. 93–406, title II, §2002(h)(2), Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 970, added items 408 and 409.

**1964**—Pub. L. 88–272, title II, §220(c)(1), Feb. 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 62, added items 406 and 407.

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–792, §5(b), Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 827, added item 405.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report of Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary Rasmussen, Chief Executive Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: April 15, 2008



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Gary Rasmussen     
| | Gary Rasmussen         
| | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc., and will be retained by Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA); Membership of the DTRA 
Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

ACTION: Notice of PRB membership.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of DTRA's PRB 
membership. The publication of the PRB membership is required by 5 
U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB shall provide fair and impartial review of 
Senior Executive Service performance appraisals and make 
recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance awards to 
the Acting Director, Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of service for the appointees of the 
DTRA PRB is on or about October 1, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tana Farrell, Operations Office, 
Business Directorate, (703) 767-5759, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, 
8725 John J. Kingman Road, Stop 6201, Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060-6201.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
officials appointed to serve as members of the DTRA PRB are set forth 
below:
    PRB Chair: Mr. Myron K. Kunka.
    Member: Dr. Arthur T. Hopkins.
    Member: Mr. Michael K. Evenson.
    The following DTRA officials will serve as alternate members of the 
DTRA PRB, as appropriate.

Mr. Douglas Bruder
Dr. Mark Byers
Ms. Shari Durand
Mr. Douglas Englund
Mr. Kevin Flanagan
Dr. Charles Gallaway
Dr. Joe Golden
Mr. Richard Gullickson
Dr. Don Linger
Ms. Joan Ma Pierre

    Dated: September 28, 2004
L. M. Bynum,
Alternate OSO Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-22174 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### Paul REX; Tom Conklin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronnie CHUMLEY, et al., Defendants, Ronnie Chumley; Patsy Williams, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 04-21027.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 1, 2006.

Sheila R. Haley, Cordell & Haley, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

William S. Helfand, Kevin D. Jewell, Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin, Houston, TX, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The initial question in this appeal is whether we have jurisdiction over the District Court’s denial of the Defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We have appellate jurisdiction only if that ruling denied the Defendants’ claim for qualified immunity on some legal ground. *See Hatfield v. Scott,*306 F.3d 223, 225 (5th Cir.2002). On the basis of the pleadings and record before us, we are unable to make that determination. We therefore dismiss the appeal and remand the case to the District Court for further proceedings.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *387the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
§ 3508.12 How do I get a competitive lease? ( a ) Notify BLM of areas in which you are interested. We may also designate certain lands for competitive leasing.
( b ) Before BLM publishes a notice of lease sale, pay a processing fee on a case-by-case basis as described in § 3000.11 of this chapter as modified by §§ 3508.14 and 3508.21. If someone else is the successful bidder, BLM will refund you the amount you paid under this paragraph. If there is no successful bidder, you remain responsible for all processing fees.
( c ) After determining that the lands are available for leasing, we will publish a notice of lease sale containing all significant information (see § 3508.14 of this part).
( d ) We will award a competitive lease through sale to the qualified bidder who offers the highest acceptable bonus bid. In the event of a tie, BLM will determine a fair method for choosing the successful bid.
[64 FR 53536, Oct. 1, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 58877, Oct. 7, 2005]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 733.27

 724.94

 725.39

 722.27

 723.24

 723.98

 724.62

 725.14

 725.62

 726.06

 726.48

 726.87

 727.18

 727.50

 727.79

 728.08

 728.36

 728.62

 728.94

 729.20

 729.46

 729.68

 729.89

 730.08

 730.28

 730.48

 730.66

 730.84

 731.01

 731.15

 1,717

 1,371

 1,388

 1,269

 1,305

 1,333

 1,358

 1,378

 1,397

 1,414

 1,431

 1,447

 1,459

 1,473

 1,484

 1,496

 1,508

 1,518

 1,532

 1,542

 1,553

 1,563

 1,571

 1,579

 1,588

 1,596

 1,604

 1,611

 1,618

 1,624

STORAGE

+23

-346

+17

-119

+36

+28

+25

+20

+19

+17

+17

+16

+12

+14

+11

+12

+12

+10

+14

+10

+11

+10

+8

+8

+9

+8

+8

+7

+7

+6

CHANGE

12

1

9

12

18

14

13

10

10

9

9

8

6

7

6

6

6

5

7

5

6

5

4

4

5

4

4

4

4

3

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 175

 0

 72

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2013 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2013

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -70 216 0 247

ACRE-FEET -70 428 0 490

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 490

 490

 1,694

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
#### Minnie W. vom Hofe, Respondent, v. Richard vom Hofe, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 3509.25 For what reasons will BLM reject my application for a future interest lease? We will reject your application: ( a ) If you do not meet the qualifications in § 3509.15 of this part;
( b ) If you filed your application less than one year before the minerals vest in the United States; or
( c ) We determine that issuing the lease is not in the public interest.