alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3465.1 Use of surface. ( a ) The operator shall use only that part of the surface area included in his lease or license to mine that has been included in an approved resource recovery and protection plan and mining permit (43 CFR 3482.1(b) and 30 CFR part 741).
( b ) Separate leases, permits, or rights-of-way under the appropriate provisions in title 43 of the Code of Federal Regulations are required for the installation of power generation plants or commercial or industrial facilities on the lands in the lease or license to mine or for the use of mineral materials or timber from the land in the lease or license to mine.
( c ) Other land uses under other authorities may be allowed on an area in a lease or license to mine provided there is no unreasonable conflict and that neither the mining operation nor the other use is jeopardized by the presence of the other.
[44 FR 42638, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33149, July 30, 1982; 50 FR 8627, Mar. 4, 1985]
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aphton Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frederick W. Jacobs,
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

       2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.



                                  /s/ Frederick W. Jacobs
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                      Frederick W. Jacobs
                                      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
                                        Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer

Dated: August 13, 2002
### §952. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 86–339, §2, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 602, which provided for any member of the Agua Caliente Band alive on Sept. 21, 1959, who had not yet received an allotment of land to be given such an allotment and provided for no further allotments of land to be made thereafter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3809.700 What criminal penalties apply to violations of this subpart? The criminal penalties established by statute for individuals and organizations are as follows: ( a ) *Individuals.* If you knowingly and willfully violate the requirements of this subpart, you may be subject to arrest and trial under section 303(a) of FLPMA (43 U.S.C. 1733(a)). If you are convicted, you will be subject to a fine of not more than $100,000 or the alternative fine provided for in the applicable provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3571, or imprisonment not to exceed 12 months, or both, for each offense; and
( b ) *Organizations.* If an organization or corporation knowingly and willfully violates the requirements of this subpart, it is subject to trial and, if convicted, will be subject to a fine of not more than $200,000, or the alternative fine provided for in the applicable provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3571.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00173-CV

__________________

JAMES MONROE WARE, Appellant

V.

ROYA DAWN WARE, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 88th District Court

Hardin County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 62114

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James Monroe Ware appealed from an order granting a bill of review. The 

appellant has neither established indigence, nor paid the filing fee in his appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 5, 20.1; see also Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. On June 29, 2021, we sent a 

letter to the parties questioning our jurisdiction and requested a response be filed by 

July 14, 2021. On July 26, 2021, we sent a letter to the parties notifying them that 

the filing fee for the appeal had not been paid and warned the parties that the appeal 

would be dismissed without further notice unless the appellant paid the filing fee. 
2

The appellant has failed to comply with the notices from the clerk requiring 

action within a specified time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Accordingly, the appeal 

is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on September 1, 2021

Opinion Delivered September 2, 2021

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 30, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the International Cooperation for the Integration of Processes in Pre-press, Press, and Postpress (“CIP4”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Integration                           ( print page 59269)                        of Processes in Pre-press, Press, and Postpress (CIP4), Zurich, SWITZERLAND. The nature and scope of CIP4's standard development activities are: to encourage computer based integration and automation of all processes that have to be considered in the graphic arts industry, in particular the specification of standards, such as CIP4's Job Definition Format (JDF). JDF is a comprehensive XML-based industry standard for end-to-end job ticket specification, device messaging and message interchange, and process automation methodologies.                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-22154 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 501.35

 500.69

 501.43

 501.01

 500.69

 500.36

 500.14

 500.03

 500.03

 500.03

 500.02

 500.00

 499.98

 499.95

 499.92

 499.78

 499.89

 500.05

 500.13

 500.00

 499.53

 499.68

 499.76

 499.83

 500.22

 500.25

 500.58

 500.46

 500.49

 500.35

 56,773

 56,051

 56,861

 56,398

 56,051

 55,693

 55,455

 55,336

 55,336

 55,336

 55,325

 55,303

 55,282

 55,250

 55,218

 55,068

 55,186

 55,357

 55,444

 55,303

 54,802

 54,962

 55,047

 55,122

 55,541

 55,574

 55,932

 55,802

 55,834

 55,682

STORAGE

-232

-722

+810

-463

-347

-358

-238

-119

+0

+0

-11

-22

-21

-32

-32

-150

+118

+171

+87

-141

-501

+160

+85

+75

+419

+33

+358

-130

+32

-152

CHANGE

319

73

850

211

269

252

226

295

354

359

354

353

356

329

332

304

319

350

308

195

10

347

313

302

472

272

443

192

272

185

INFLOW

 432

 431

 436

 439

 435

 427

 340

 348

 348

 350

 352

 359

 359

 340

 345

 375

 257

 257

 261

 261

 262

 264

 268

 262

 256

 253

 259

 253

 256

 256

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 4

 6

 6

 5

 9

 5

 6

 7

 6

 9

 8

 5

 8

 5

 3

 5

 3

 7

 3

 5

 1

 2

 2

 2

 5

 2

 4

 5

 0

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2013 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/01/2013

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,323 9,216 9,741 0 0 144

ACRE-FEET -1,323 18,280 19,321 0 0 286

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 19,321

SPILL 0 19,321

 57,005

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 316

 84

 838

 214

 367

 307

 303

 341

 355

 354

 355

 355

 354

 354

 353

 353

 353

 353

 360

 138

 13

 346

 316

 312

 464

 276

 438

 194

 277

 194

 9,637

 19,115

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Century Properties Growth Fund XXII 1998 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000740156
<NAME> CENTURY PROPERTIES GROWTH FUND XXII
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           7,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         131,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,088   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,180   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         73,299     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,272    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,180    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,247    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,519    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,451    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (28)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,249     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    13.30<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form F-3 of World Heart Corporation of our report dated February
10, 2003, except for note 20 (c), which is at April 14, 2003 relating to the
consolidated financial statements which appears in World Heart Corporation's
Annual Report to shareholders on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Registration Statement.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Ottawa, Canada
January 20, 2004
#### § 3465.2-3 Failure of lessee or holder of license to mine to act.

Failure of a lessee or the holder of a license to mine to comply with an immediate cessation order issued under § 3465.3-2(b) or with a written notice of noncompliance issued by the Surface Mining Officer in accordance with part 3480 of this title or 30 CFR Chapter VII, Subchapter D, or by the authorized officer in accordance with part 3480 of this title, shall be grounds for suspension of the permit and may be grounds for cancellation of the license to mine, or in accordance with subpart 3452 of this title, the lease.

[44 FR 42638, July 19, 1979. Redesignated and amended at 47 FR 33149, July 30, 1982; 50 FR 8627, Mar. 4, 1985]
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Ellen F. Wentz, Late of the City of Geneva, N. Y., Deceased. Annie Goodman, Appellant; Edward Ostrander, Individually and as Executor, etc., and Another, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs. .All concurred.
§ 3830.11 Which minerals are locatable under the General Mining Law? Minerals are locatable if they are: ( a ) Subject to the General Mining Law;
( b ) Not leasable under the Mineral Leasing Acts; and
( c ) Not salable under the Mineral Materials Act of 1947 and Surface Resources Act of 1955, 30 U.S.C. 601-615 (see parts 3600 through 3620 of this chapter).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 31, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Amplicon Liveline Ltd., Brighton, East Sussex, UNITED KINGDOM; Mapsuka Industries Co., Ltd., Taipei Hsien, TAIWAN; and PXIdirect GmbH, Ilgen, GERMANY have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Memberships in this group research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2000 (66 FR 13971).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 2, 2004. A notice was published in the                     **Federal                               ( print page 59271)                            Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 22, 2004 (69 FR 34693).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-22166  Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
April 2022

STORAGE 1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION** PRECIP**

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW

C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

807.3

1 2,231.89 807.8 0.5 1,027 712 0 0 45 0.20 0.00

2 2,231.97 808.4 0.6 965 615 0 0 41 0.18 0.00

3 2,231.91 808.0 -0.5 865 1,055 0 0 41 0.18 0.00

4 2,231.92 808.0 0.1 869 789 0 0 41 0.18 0.00

5 2,231.89 807.8 -0.2 963 1,054 0 0 25 0.11 0.00

6 2,231.89 807.8 0.0 875 825 0 0 50 0.22 0.00

7 2,231.82 807.3 -0.5 876 1,108 0 0 38 0.17 0.00

8 2,231.75 806.7 -0.5 869 1,096 0 0 43 0.19 0.00

9 2,231.66 806.1 -0.7 881 1,178 0 0 50 0.22 0.00

10 2,231.57 805.4 -0.7 771 1,059 0 0 59 0.26 0.00

11 2,231.49 804.8 -0.6 802 1,068 0 0 43 0.19 0.19

12 2,231.39 804.0 -0.8 691 1,077 0 0 0 0.00 0.04

13 2,231.32 803.5 -0.5 844 1,078 0 0 36 0.16 0.00

14 2,231.27 803.1 -0.4 947 1,136 0 0 4 0.02 0.79

15 2,231.20 802.5 -0.5 855 1,100 0 0 25 0.11 0.19

16 2,231.15 802.2 -0.4 1,049 1,242 0 0 0 0.00 1.01

17 2,231.08 801.6 -0.5 860 1,092 0 0 38 0.17 0.00

18 2,231.00 801.0 -0.6 833 1,104 0 0 38 0.17 0.00

19 2,230.75 799.1 -1.9 969 1,524 0 396 7 0.03 0.28

20 2,229.60 790.4 -8.7 933 713 0 4,609 9 0.04 0.06

21 2,228.53 782.3 -8.1 1,399 0 0 5,465 0 0.00 0.43

22 2,227.86 777.3 -5.0 1,401 0 0 3,921 13 0.06 0.17

23 2,227.44 774.2 -3.1 1,293 0 0 2,826 48 0.22 0.00

24 2,227.23 772.6 -1.6 1,267 0 0 2,019 39 0.18 0.00

25 2,227.16 772.1 -0.5 1,282 898 0 606 42 0.19 0.00

26 2,227.01 771.0 -1.1 1,377 1,534 0 372 35 0.16 0.00

27 2,226.92 770.3 -0.7 1,431 1,530 0 190 48 0.22 0.00

28 2,226.74 768.9 -1.3 1,309 1,481 0 455 46 0.21 0.00

29 2,226.55 767.5 -1.4 1,275 1,487 0 455 44 0.20 0.00

30 2,226.39 766.3 -1.2 1,340 1,437 0 455 46 0.21 0.00

TOTALS -40.8 31,118 28,992 0 21,769 994 4.45 3.16

ACRE-FEET -40,800 61,723 57,506 0 43,179 1,972

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

 ** Evaporation and precipitation records taken from station at Trinity River Hatchery.

Precipitation

This month = 3.16

October 01, 2021 To date = 17.27

SUMMARY 

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 57,506 Outlet 43,179

Spill 0

Total 100684.4435

Historical Archive and Report Database

Trinity Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/24/2023
§ 3254.11 What will BLM do if my exploration operations are not in compliance with my permit, other BLM approvals or orders, or the regulations in this part? ( a ) BLM will issue you a written Incident of Noncompliance and direct you to correct the problem within a set time. If the noncompliance continues or is serious in nature, we will take one or more of the following actions: ( 1 ) Correct the problem at your expense;
( 2 ) Direct you to modify or shut down your operations; or
( 3 ) Collect all or part of your bond.
( b ) We may also require you to take actions to prevent unnecessary impacts on the lands. If so, we will notify you of the nature and extent of any required measures and the time you have to complete them.
( c ) Noncompliance may result in BLM terminating your lease, if appropriate under §§ 3213.17 through 3213.19.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 23, 2009

s1116 

# Order

November 23, 2009

139382 & (35)

JERAL A. PEOPLES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 139382 COA: 290762 Wayne CC: 03-007347-01 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 7, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for the appointment
of counsel is DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 20, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41194 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TERANCE TERRAIL RAYMO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-191-1

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Terance Terrail Raymo appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He argues that the district court clearly erred in overruling his objection to the presentence report’s drug-quantity calculation and including the 10.72 grams of cocaine base recovered on August 8, 2002, as relevant conduct under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(2). Raymo also argues that the quantity of the cocaine base (10.72 grams) isNo. 03-41194 -2- insufficient as a matter of law to create an inference of intent to distribute. Raymo has not demonstrated that the district court clearly erred in including the 10.72 grams of cocaine base as relevant conduct. This offense was sufficiently similar and in close temporal proximity to the offense of conviction to reasonably suggest that it constituted the same course of conduct. See United States v. Bethley , 973 F.2d 396, 401 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Ocana , 204 F.3d 585, 589-90 (5th Cir. 2000). Further, Raymo has not demonstrated that the district court clearly erred in finding that he possessed the 10.72 grams of cocaine base for distribution purposes rather than for personal consumption. See United States v. Buck , 324 F.3d 786, 796 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Kates , 174 F.3d 580, 582-83 (5th Cir. 1999). Therefore, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Max Becker, Respondent.

Motion for a stay granted. Motion to dismiss appeals denied.