alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hamilton, Miller & Birthisel, LLP 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN ADMIRALTY

CASE No.: 20-cv-21696

SILK ROAD TRADING & SHIPPING CO., LTD.,

a Foreign Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WORLD FUEL SERVICES (SINGAPORE) PTE 

LTD., a Foreign Corporation, WORLD FUEL 

SERVICES TRADING DMCC, a Foreign Corporation, 

and WORLD FUEL SERVICES CORPORATION 

d/b/a WORLD FUEL SERVICES MARINE GROUP 

OF COMPANIES, a Florida Corporation. 

Defendants. 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The Parties hereto have amicably resolved their dispute, and they hereby agree 

and stipulate to the dismissal of this case and all claims therein, with prejudice. The 

Parties also agree they will each bear and be responsible for their own attorneys’ fees 

and costs. A proposed order for dismissal with prejudice is attached. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Case 1:20-cv-21696-DPG Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2022 Page 1 of 2
Hamilton, Miller & Birthisel, LLP 2

/s/ Neil Bayer 

Neil Bayer, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 615684

Campbell Johnston Clark LLP 

Douglas Centre 

2600 Douglas Road, Suite 508 

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Tel: 786-204-3784 

Neil@cjclaw.com

Cindy@cjclaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

/s/ David N. Gambach

David N. Gambach, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 8540

HAMILTON, MILLER & BIRTHISEL, LLP.

150 Southeast Second Avenue, Suite 1200

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone 305-379-3686

Facsimile 305-379-3690

DGambach@HamiltonMillerLaw.com

JMendez@HamiltonMillerLaw.com

Counsel for Defendants

Case 1:20-cv-21696-DPG Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2022 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10041

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROGER WAYNE LANGSTON, also known as Big Country,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-132-8

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roger Wayne Langston appeals the 480-month sentence imposed 

following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to 

distribute a controlled substance. He contends that his sentence is 

substantively unreasonable.

We need not decide whether to apply plain error review because 

Langston’s arguments fail to show any abuse of discretion. See Gall v. United 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 13, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-10041 Document: 00514234755 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/13/2017
No. 17-10041

2

States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United States v. Rodriguez, 523 F.3d 522, 525 

(5th Cir. 2008). He asserts that his sentence was much higher than the 

average drug trafficking sentences, but he does not demonstrate that these 

average sentences involved similarly situated defendants. See United States 

v. Simpson, 796 F.3d 548, 559 (5th Cir. 2015). The district court was aware of 

the guidelines calculations, the applicable statutory ranges, and Langston’s 

mitigating arguments but decided to impose a sentence within the guidelines 

range. The district court cited the length and seriousness of Langston’s 

criminal history and emphasized his use of violence. “[T]he sentencing judge 

is in a superior position to find facts and judge their import under [18 U.S.C.] 

§ 3553(a) with respect to a particular defendant.” United States v. CamposMaldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 339 (5th Cir. 2008). Langston’s argument that the 

mitigating factors presented for the court’s consideration should have been 

balanced differently is “insufficient to disturb” the presumption of 

reasonableness that applies to his lengthy-but-within-guidelines sentence. 

United States v. Alvarado, 691 F.3d 592, 597 (5th Cir. 2012); see Simpson, 796 

F.3d at 559-60. Moreover, his challenge to the reasonableness of or deference 

owed to the drug quantity guideline is foreclosed. See id. at 560.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-10041 Document: 00514234755 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/13/2017
§ 3175.46 Isolating flow conditioners. The BLM will list on *www.blm.gov* the make, model, and size of isolating flow conditioner that is approved for use in conjunction with a flange-tapped orifice plate, so long as the isolating flow conditioner is installed, operated, and maintained in compliance with the requirements of this section. Approval of a particular make and model is obtained as prescribed in this section. ( a ) All testing required under this section must be performed at a qualified test facility not affiliated with the flow-conditioner manufacturer.
( b ) The operator or manufacturer must test the flow conditioner under API 14.3.2, Annex D (incorporated by reference, see § 3175.30) and submit all test data to the BLM.
( c ) The PMT will review the test data to ensure that the device meets the requirements of API 14.3.2, Annex D (incorporated by reference, see § 3175.30) and make a recommendation to the BLM to either approve use of the device, disapprove use of the device, or approve it with conditions for its use.
( d ) If approved, the BLM will add the approved make and model, and any applicable conditions of use, to the list maintained at *www.blm.gov .*
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNonequilibrium radiation and chemistry models for aerocapture vehicle flowfieldsThe primary tasks performed are: (1) the development of a second order local thermodynamic nonequilibrium (LTNE) model for atoms; (2) the continued development of vibrational nonequilibrium models; and (3) the development of a new multicomponent diffusion model. In addition, studies comparing these new models with previous models and results were conducted and reported.Document ID19910017877Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCarlson, Leland A.*(Texas A&M Univ. College Station, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1991Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:188646NASA-CR-188646TAMRF-6382-91-02Accession Number91N27191Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-1003Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910017877.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick L. Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Patrick L. AlexanderPatrick L. AlexanderChief Executive OfficerMarch 17, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from unaudited financial statements for the
three month period ending March 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0000739918
<NAME>                       ONE FINANCIAL PLACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>                 1
<CURRENCY>                   U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                        11
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                11
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
<BONDS>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                            (2,894,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  11
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               0
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          72,326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (72,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (72,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (72,828) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (129.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (129.77)
        


</TABLE>
#### § 802.409 Grant or denial of request.

All requests for reconsideration shall be reviewed by the Board and shall be granted or denied in the discretion of the Board.
EX-10.21





 Exhibit 10.21 

 
  
 



 
 Mr. Ralph Baxter 
 Ralph
Baxter, Inc. 
 37 Hamilton Avenue 
 Wheeling, WV 26003 

June 16, 2020 
 RE: Fifth Amendment to
Consulting Agreement dated March 1, 2016 
 Dear Ralph: 

This Fifth Amendment (the “Fifth Amendment”) amends the previously signed Consulting Agreement by and between Integration Appliance,
Inc. (“Company”) and Ralph Baxter, Inc. (“Consultant”) dated March 1, 2016, and amended on April 28, 2017, January 1, 2019, April 30, 2019, and on December 18, 2019 (as amended, the
“Agreement”). 
  

	 	1.	 The parties agree to extend the term of the Agreement. Therefore, Section 6(c) of the Agreement shall be
deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows: 


 “(c) Expiration. Unless terminated earlier, this Agreement
will expire on June 30, 2021.” 
 Unless otherwise specified, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.
This Fifth Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. A facsimile or pdf signature shall be considered valid as if an original
signature. 
 Except as specifically amended by this Fifth Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. To the extent that
there is any conflict between the provisions of this Fifth Amendment and the Agreement, the provisions of this Fifth Amendment shall prevail. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties, through the signatures below of their duly authorized officers, have executed this Fifth Amendment as of the dates set forth below. 
  

									
	RALPH BAXTER, INC.	 		 	INTEGRATION APPLIANCE, INC.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Ralph Baxter
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen Robertson

	Name:	 	 Ralph Baxter
	 		 	Name:	 	 Stephen Robertson

	Title:	 	 Principal
	 		 	Title:	 	 CFO

	Date:	 	 17 June 2020
	 		 	Date:	 	 17 June 2020



  
 Page 1 of 1
### PART I—ACCOUNTING PERIODS

Sec.
441.
Period for computation of taxable income.
442.
Change of annual accounting period.
443.
Returns for a period of less than 12 months.
444.
Election of taxable year other than required taxable year.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10206(a)(2), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–398, added item 444.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FERNANDO FONTANEZ

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 2 3

- 0 3540 (UNA)

)

)

JOE BIDEN et al

. , )

)

Defendant s

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter , filed pro se

, is before the Court on its initial review of Plaintiff’s complaint

,

ECF No. 1, and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis , ECF No. 2. The Court will

grant the application and dismiss the c omplaint

.

Plaintiff , a resident of Washington, D.C., has filed a document captioned Petition to

Reimburse War on Terror to U.S. Government and U.S. Taxpayer After Private Oil Companies

Gleaned Billions in Profits of Iraqi Oil at Taxpayer Expense. The named defendants are President

Joe Biden and U.S. Treasur y Secretary Janet Yellen

. Beyond the caption

, the complaint is

incomprehensible. Regardless, the Supreme Court “ has consistently held ” that a plaintiff raising

,

as here, “ only a generally available grievance about government

, ” claiming no specific harm to

himself , and “seeking relief that no more directly and tangibly benefits him than it does the public

at large does not state an Article III case or controversy ” or establish Article III standing. Lujan

v. Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 5 55, 573

- 74 (1992) ; see DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno , 547

U.S. 332, 342 (2006) (“ The ‘ core component ’ of the requirement that a litigant have standing to

invoke the authority of a federal court ‘ is an essential and unchanging part of the case

- or

-2 controvers y requirement of Article III. ’ ” ) (quoting Lujan , 504 U.S. at 560). Consequently, this

case will be dismissed by separate order.

_________/s/___________

__ _ CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

Date: January 12 , 202 4 United States District Judge
### §107. Rental value of parsonages

In the case of a minister of the gospel, gross income does not include—

(1) the rental value of a home furnished to him as part of his compensation; or

(2) the rental allowance paid to him as part of his compensation, to the extent used by him to rent or provide a home and to the extent such allowance does not exceed the fair rental value of the home, including furnishings and appurtenances such as a garage, plus the cost of utilities.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 32; Pub. L. 107–181, §2(a), May 20, 2002, 116 Stat. 583.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Par. (2). Pub. L. 107–181 inserted "and to the extent such allowance does not exceed the fair rental value of the home, including furnishings and appurtenances such as a garage, plus the cost of utilities" before period at end.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Pub. L. 107–181, §2(b), May 20, 2002, 116 Stat. 583, provided that:

"(1) In general.—The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2001.

"(2) Returns positions.—The amendment made by this section also shall apply to any taxable year beginning before January 1, 2002, for which the taxpayer—

"(A) on a return filed before April 17, 2002, limited the exclusion under section 107 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as provided in such amendment, or

"(B) filed a return after April 16, 2002.

"(3) Other years before 2002.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), notwithstanding any prior regulation, revenue ruling, or other guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service, no person shall be subject to the limitations added to section 107 of such Code by this Act for any taxable year beginning before January 1, 2002."
§ 2886.14 As grant or TUP holders, what liabilities do state, tribal, and local governments have? ( a ) If you are a state, tribal, or local government or its agency or instrumentality, you are liable to the fullest extent law allows at the time that BLM issues your grant or TUP. If you do not have the legal power to assume full liability, you must repair damages or make restitution to the fullest extent of your powers.
( b ) BLM may require you to provide a bond, insurance, or other acceptable security to: ( 1 ) Protect the liability exposure of the United States to claims by third parties arising out of your use and occupancy of the right-of-way or TUP area;
( 2 ) Cover any losses, damages, or injury to human health, the environment, and property incurred in connection with your use and occupancy of the right-of-way or TUP area; and
( 3 ) Cover any damages or injuries resulting from the release or discharge of hazardous materials incurred in connection with your use and occupancy of the right-of-way or TUP area.
( c ) Based on your record of compliance and changes in risk and conditions, BLM may require you to increase or decrease the amount of your bond, insurance, or security.
( d ) The provisions of this section do not limit or exclude other remedies.
### §2708. Commission; access to information

The Commission may secure from any department or agency of the United States information necessary to enable it to carry out this chapter. Upon the request of the Chairman, the head of such department or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission, unless otherwise prohibited by law.

(Pub. L. 100–497, §9, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2472.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 100–497, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2467, known as the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2701 of this title and Tables.
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it
No. 09-1593 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v . JAMES WERRA, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on March 22, 2011 is amended as follows: On page 4, note 1, replace "note 19" with "note 20" On page 36, line 10, page 37, line 6 a n d p a ge 39, line 6, replace "Befell" with "Bedell" On page 39, line 3, replace "at 18' with "at 19" On page 39, line 16, replace "at 18-19' with "at 19" On page 40, line 2, replace "at 16' with "at 17" On page 43, line 10, replace "Id.' with "Id. 19-20" On page 43, note 26, line 5, replace "at 19 n.11' with "at 20 n.13" On page 50, line 5, replace "authorised" with "authorized" On page 58, footnote 29, line 3, replace "n.19' with "n.20" On page 61, footnote 31, replace "at 30 n.18' with "at 31 n.19" On page 62, footnote 32 line 4, replace "at 28" with "at 29" On page 62, footnote 32 line 6, replace "at 30 n.18" with "at 31 n.19" On page 62, footnote 32, lines 7-8, replace "note 10" with "note 31"
Exhibit 10.3


 





LOAN AGREEMENT


 


This Loan Agreement (the “Agreement”)
is made as of May 13, 2019, by and between Eco Wave Power Ltd., an Israeli Company (the “Company”), and David Leb (the “Lender”).
The parties agree as follows:


 


1. Loan.
Both parties acknowledge that the Lender extended to the Company in the past a loan in the aggregate amount of US$800,000 (the “Loan”)
with no interest rate.


 


2. Payment.
The Company shall repay to the Lender the loan amount within 36 months. If loan is not repaid, interest shall be at 4% per annum.


 


3. Miscellaneous.
Each of the parties hereto shall perform such further acts and execute such further documents as may reasonably be necessary to carry
out and give full effect to the provisions of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed according to the laws
of the State of Israel, without regard to the conflict of laws provisions thereof. Except as otherwise expressly limited herein, the provisions
hereof shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the successors, permitted assigns, heirs, executors, and administrators of
the parties hereto. This Agreement constitutes the full and entire understanding between the parties and supersedes all oral and written
understandings with regard to its subject matter. No delay or omission to exercise any right, power, or remedy accruing to any party upon
any breach or default under this Agreement, shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach or default theretofore or thereafter occurring.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties
have signed this Loan Agreement (in one or more counterparts) as of the date first set forth above.


 





	/s/ /s/ Eco Wave Power Ltd.	 
	Eco Wave Power Ltd.	 
	 	 
	By:	Inna Braverman	 


 





	/s/ David Leb	 
	David Leb
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cooper Industries, Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H. John Riley,
Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ H. John Riley, Jr.
----------------------
H. John Riley, Jr.
Chairman, President and
  Chief Executive Officer

March 8, 2004