alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAC Costv2.3--July 12, 1999 U.S. Dept of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

## EE-RM/STD 98-440-COMMENT-#309D 1.Select the unita equipment costs ou want to examine: Contact DOE/Building Technologies Program, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy on (202-586-9127) to view indicated spreadsheets. 2. Select how you would liketo adjust the costs: Enter a new component cost Change the original component cost by a specified percentage Change the original component cost by a specified dollar amount Split HP SHP % Split HP SHP $ Split AC w/o blower SAC Nbwr % Split AC w/o blower SAC Nbwr $ Split AC w/ blower SAC Bwr Split AC w/ blower SAC Bwr $ Package HP PHP % Package HP PHP $ Package AC PAC % Package AC PAC $ CAC Costv2.3--July 12, 1999 U.S. Deptof Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 1. Selectthe

2. Select howyou would liketoadjustthe costs: Entera newcomponentcost Changethe original componentcost by a specified percentage Changethe original componentcost by a specified dollar amount Split HP Split AC wlo blower Split AC wI blower Package HP Package AC SHP % SAC Nbwr %

SAC Bwr

PHP% PAC % 

## EE-RM/STO 98-440-COMMENT-#3090

Contact DOE/Building Technologies Program, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy on (202-586-9127) toview indicated spreadsheets.

Split HP SHP 

### $ Split AC wlo blower SAC Nbwr 

### $ SplitAC wI blower SAC Bwr 

### $ Package HP PHP 

### $ Package AC PAC 

### $
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4667 

To amend the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 to 

require additional reporting and public disclosure of information. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2022 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure 

Act of 1978 to require additional reporting and public 

disclosure of information. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmland Security Act 

5 of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4667 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPORTS AND PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF INFORMA2 TION ON FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN AGRICUL3 TURAL LAND. 

4 (a) REPORTS.—Section 6 of the Agricultural Foreign 

5 Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 3505) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking the section designation and 

8 heading and all that follows through ‘‘Not later 

9 than’’ and inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘SEC. 6. REPORTS. 

11 ‘‘(a) TO STATES.—Not later than’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(b) TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 180 days after 

14 the date of enactment of this subsection, and annually 

15 thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report 

16 on foreign investments in agricultural land in the United 

17 States, including a description of the impact that foreign 

18 ownership of agricultural land has on family farms, rural 

19 communities, and the domestic food supply.’’. 

20 (b) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION.—Sec21 tion 7 of the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure 

22 Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 3506) is amended to read as fol23 lows: 

24 ‘‘SEC. 7. PUBLIC DATABASE. 

25 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after 

26 the date of enactment of the Farmland Security Act of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4667 IS

1 2022, the Secretary shall establish, and make publicly 

2 available on the Department of Agriculture website, a 

3 database that— 

4 ‘‘(1) contains data from each report submitted 

5 to the Secretary under section 2 in the preceding 

6 calendar year; and 

7 ‘‘(2) not later than 10 days after the submis8 sion of any report under section 2, shall be updated 

9 with the data in that report. 

10 ‘‘(b) DATABASE ORGANIZATION.—The database de11 scribed in paragraph (1) shall organize information into 

12 the following categories with respect to a foreign person 

13 who has submitted a report under section 2: 

14 ‘‘(1) If the foreign person is an individual, the 

15 citizenship of the foreign person. 

16 ‘‘(2) If the foreign person is not an individual 

17 or a government— 

18 ‘‘(A) the nature of the legal entity that is 

19 the foreign person; 

20 ‘‘(B) the country in which the foreign per21 son is registered or organized; and 

22 ‘‘(C) the principal place of business of the 

23 foreign person.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Application of Charles J. Steinbugler, Jr., also known as Charles J. Steinbugler, for Admission to the Bar.

-Application granted. Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ; Carswell, J., not voting.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual Report of J. Allen Greer,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin Ericksteen,
Chief Financail Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                   --------------------------
Date: May 11, 2006                                     Kevin Ericksteen
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### § 3430.2 Application for lease.
### §1775a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–377, §3, Oct. 19, 1994, 108 Stat. 3502, which set out definitions for this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### [PART VIII—REPEALED]
### §409a. Sale of restricted lands; reinvestment in other restricted lands

Whenever any nontaxable land of a restricted Indian of the Five Civilized Tribes or of any other Indian tribe is sold to any State, county, or municipality for public-improvement purposes, or is acquired, under existing law, by any State, county, or municipality by condemnation or other proceedings for such public purposes, or is sold under existing law to any other person or corporation for other purposes, the money received for said land may, in the discretion and with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, be reinvested in other lands selected by said Indian, and such land so selected and purchased shall be restricted as to alienation, lease, or incumbrance, and nontaxable in the same quantity and upon the same terms and conditions as the nontaxable lands from which the reinvested funds were derived, and such restrictions shall appear in the conveyance.

(Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 374, 46 Stat. 1471; June 30, 1932, ch. 333, 47 Stat. 474.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1932—Act June 30, 1932, made section applicable to lands of any restricted Indian of any other Indian tribe, and provided for sale of lands to any State and acquisition by any State instead of only to and by the State of Oklahoma.
October 14, 2014

BY EMAIL /MAIL

Ms. Lauralyn J. Remo

Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division

Office of Aviation Analysis

c/0 Docket Operations

M

- 30, Room W12

- 140

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Dynamic Aviation Docket DOT

- OST

- 2014

- 0069

Dear Ms. Remo

,

Attached is additional key personnel information as required by 14 CFR § 204.3 concerning

Dynamic Airways’ Director of Maintenance Mr. Mike Steinke.

Respectfully,

Joanne W. Young

David M. Kirstein

Kirstein & Young, PLLC

1750 K St. NW, Suite 200

Washington, DC 2006

(202) 331

- 3348

jyoung@yklaw.com

dkirstein@yklaw.com

Counsel for Dynamic Airways, LLC

CC: Damon Walker

DOT

- OST

- 2014

- 0069

October 14, 2014
Att. 00 1 **Contains Confidential Business Information** Confidential Information Redacted
§ 3140.13 Exploration plans. ( a ) The authorized officer may grant permission to holders of existing oil and gas leases to gather information to develop, perfect, complete or amend a plan of operations required for conversion upon the approval of the authorized officer of an exploration plan developed in accordance with 43 CFR 3592.1.
( b ) The approval of an exploration plan in units of the National Park System requires the consent of the Regional Director of the National Park Service in accordance with § 3140.70.
( c ) The filing of an exploration plan alone will be insufficient to meet the requirements of a complete plan of operations as set forth in § 3140.23.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4597 

To allow individuals with disabilities to campaign for elected office without 

losing access to federally supported benefits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2022 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. BOOKER, 

Mr. PADILLA, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. WYDEN, and 

Ms. HIRONO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To allow individuals with disabilities to campaign for elected 

office without losing access to federally supported benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Access Bar5 riers to Running for Elected Office for People with Dis6 abilities Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4597 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISREGARDING CAMPAIGN WORK PERFORMED BY 

2 INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES FOR PUR3 POSES OF FEDERALLY SUPPORTED BENE4 FITS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any campaign work performed by 

6 a qualified individual, and any compensation received by 

7 such individual for such work, shall be disregarded for the 

8 purpose of determining such individual’s eligibility for, 

9 and amount of, benefits or assistance under any Federal 

10 program or under any State or local program financed in 

11 whole or in part with Federal funds. 

12 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

13 (1) CAMPAIGN WORK.—The term ‘‘campaign 

14 work’’ means work performed by an individual as a 

15 candidate for an elected Federal, State, or local of16 fice. 

17 (2) QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL.—The term ‘‘quali18 fied individual’’ means an individual who is entitled 

19 to a benefit under title II or XVI of the Social Secu20 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq., 1381 et seq.) by 

21 reason of a disability. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### §640d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §1, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1712, which related to appointment of a mediator to assist in the negotiations for the settlement and partition of interests of the Hopi and Navajo Tribes in certain lands and duties of mediator, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 1988 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–666, §1, Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3929, provided that Pub. L. 100–666 [see Tables for classification] could be cited as the "Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation Amendments of 1988".

#### Short Title of 1980 Amendment

Pub. L. 96–305, §1, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 929, provided that Pub. L. 96–305 [see Tables for classification] could be cited as the "Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation Amendments Act of 1980".
### §231. Enforcement of State laws affecting health and education; entry of State employees on Indian lands

The Secretary of the Interior, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, shall permit the agents and employees of any State to enter upon Indian tribal lands, reservations, or allotments therein (1) for the purpose of making inspection of health and educational conditions and enforcing sanitation and quarantine regulations or (2) to enforce the penalties of State compulsory school attendance laws against Indian children, and parents, or other persons in loco parentis except that this subparagraph (2) shall not apply to Indians of any tribe in which a duly constituted governing body exists until such body has adopted a resolution consenting to such application.

(Feb. 15, 1929, ch. 216, 45 Stat. 1185; Aug. 9, 1946, ch. 930, 60 Stat. 962.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1946—Act Aug. 9, 1946, permitted proper State officers to invoke penalties of State compulsory school attendance against Indian children, their parents, or other persons in loco parentis.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
#### Alfonso D’Amore, Appellant, v. Harold Hanson et al., Respondents.

Present— Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and MeCurn, JJ.
Exhibit 12



HOLMES FINANCING (NO.4) PLC

04167953



ABBEY NATIONAL HOUSE

2 TRITON SQUARE, REGENTS PLACE

LONDON NW1 3AN



I, Martin McDermott, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on Form 6-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of HOLMES FINANCING (NO.4) PLC;



2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and upon representations made to me by the servicer, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and



5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicers
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon representations made to me by the servicer.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Abbey National plc.



Date: June 30, 2004



|                    
|--------------------
|/s/ Martin McDermott
|Martin McDermott    
|Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6057

RONALD EARL COLEMAN,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, Virginia Department of Corrections, 

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief 

District Judge. (7:10-cv-00193-gec-mfu)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Earl Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell 

Theisen, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Earl Coleman seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Coleman has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, David I. Rosenthal, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SpectraLink
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. May 10, 2004 /s/ DAVID I. ROSENTHALBy: Vice President of
Finance and Administration
and Chief Financial Officer
 33
### Subpart A—Effects on Recipients

Sec.
301.
Distributions of property.
302.
Distributions in redemption of stock.
303.
Distributions in redemption of stock to pay death taxes.
304.
Redemption through use of related corporations.
305.
Distributions of stock and stock rights.
306.
Dispositions of certain stock.
307.
Basis of stock and stock rights acquired in distributions.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 95-50918 

Summary Calendar

______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KELVIN ONEAL LANKFORD,

a/k/a Kevin, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-95-CR-272

_________________________________________________________________

February 1, 1996

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

Kelvin ONeal Lankford appeals the district court's denial of

his motion to revoke a pretrial detention. We have reviewed the

proceedings below and find support for the district court's

decision affirming the magistrates judge and denying Lankford's

motion to revoke the detention order. Lankford's assertion that he

was only a user of cocaine is contradicted by the surveillance

evidence that Lankford received large quantities of cocaine from a

codefendant. Given the nature of the offense and the strength of

the evidence against Lankford, the district court's denial of
2

Lankford's motion to revoke the pretrial detention order was not an

abuse of discretion. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g); United States v.

Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied,

___U.S.___, 113 S.Ct. 1336, 122 L.Ed.2d 720 (1993).

AFFIRMED.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4755 

To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to ensure 

that ranchers who have grazing agreements on national grasslands are 

treated the same as permittees on other Federal land. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2022 

Mr. THUNE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 

of 1976 to ensure that ranchers who have grazing agreements on national grasslands are treated the same as 

permittees on other Federal land. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF NATIONAL GRASSLANDS FOR 

4 GRAZING LEASES AND PERMITS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 402(a) of the Federal 

6 Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 

7 1752(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘lands within National 

8 Forests’’ and inserting ‘‘National Forest System (as deVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:14 Aug 12, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4755.IS S4755

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4755 IS

1 fined in section 11(a) of the Forest and Rangeland Renew2 able Resources Planning Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 

3 1609(a))) land’’. 

4 (b) EFFECT.—Nothing in the amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) modifies or affects— 

6 (1) the applicability to national grasslands of 

7 any provision of the Federal Land Policy and Man8 agement Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) other 

9 than section 402 of that Act (43 U.S.C. 1752); 

10 (2) title III of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Ten11 ant Act (7 U.S.C. 1010 et seq.); or 

12 (3) section 11 of the Public Rangelands Im13 provement Act of 1978 (43 U.S.C. 1907). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB