alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A


                               JACKAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
             (exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

         NEVADA                                             87-0438641
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                          Identification Number)

3098 South Highland Drive, Suite 460
Salt Lake City, Utah                                        84106
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (801) 485-7775

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

     The undersigned  registrant  hereby amends the following  items,  financial
statements,  exhibits or other portions of its Form 10-Q dated August 8, 1996 as
set forth in the page attached hereto:

                      Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule




<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                 JACKAL INDUSTRIES, INC.


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ Krista Nielson
                                 Krista Nielson, President, CEO and Director


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ David R. Yeaman
                                 David R. Yeaman, Secretary/Treasurer,
                                                  CFO and Director
### §450a–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 450a–1 was editorially reclassified as section 5303 of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

d0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

138499(70)

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF YPSILANTI, TOWNSHIP OF SALEM, and CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF AUGUSTA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

LINCOLN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS and JOHN B. COLLINS, Plaintiffs,

v SC: 138499 COA: 281498 Washtenaw CC: 06-000059-CK WASHTENAW COUNTY, WASHTENAW COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, WASHTENAW COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, JEFF IRWIN, LEAH GUNN, ROBERT BRACKENBURY, BA RBARA BERGMAN, MARTHA KERN, MARK OUIMET, CONAN SMITH, and STEPHEN SOLOWCZUK, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s September 11, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it doe s not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

C AVANAGH , J., not participating due to a fa milial relationship with counsel of
record.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133229 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan SYBIL JAQUES, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133229 COA: 270715 Wayne CC: 04-436600-CK HENRY BASKIN and THE BASKIN LAW FIRM, P.C., f/k/a HENRY BASKIN, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
### §408. Surrender of allotments by relinquishment for benefit of children

In any case where an Indian has an allotment of land, or any right, title, or interest in such an allotment, the Secretary of the Interior, in his discretion, may permit such Indian to surrender such allotment, or any right, title, or interest therein, by such formal relinquishment as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior, for the benefit of any of his or her children to whom no allotment of land shall have been made; and thereupon the Secretary of the Interior shall cause the estate so relinquished to be allotted to such child or children subject to all conditions which attached to it before such relinquishment.

(June 25, 1910, ch. 431, §3, 36 Stat. 856.)
----

Exhibit 99.4 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Provident Energy Trust (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark N. Walker, Vice President, Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer of Provident Energy Ltd., who performs the same function forthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

- The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and  
- The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results  of operations of the Company. 

By: : /s/ Mark N. Walker                                                         Mark N. Walker         Vice President, Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer of Provident Energy Ltd. 

April 26, 2004 

----
§ 3211.18 What is the royalty rate on geothermal resources produced from or attributable to my lease that are used directly for purposes other than commercial generation of electricity? ( a ) For leases issued on or after August 8, 2005 (other than leases issued in response to applications that were pending on that date for which the lessee does not make an election under § 3200.8(b)), and for leases issued before August 8, 2005, whose royalty terms are modified to the terms prescribed in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 under § 3212.25: ( 1 ) If you or your affiliate use(s) the geothermal resources directly and do(es) not sell those resources at arm's length, no royalty rate applies. Instead, you must pay direct use fees according to a schedule published by MMS under MMS regulations at 30 CFR 206.356.
( 2 ) If you or your affiliate sell(s) the geothermal resources at arm's length to a purchaser who uses the resources for purposes other than commercial generation of electricity, your royalty rate is 10 percent. You must apply that royalty rate to the gross proceeds derived from the arm's-length sale under applicable MMS regulations at 30 CFR part 206, subpart H.
( 3 ) If you are a lessee and you are a state, tribal, or local government, no royalty rate applies. Instead you must pay a nominal fee established under MMS rules at 30 CFR 206.366.
( b ) For leases issued before August 8, 2005, whose royalty terms are not modified to the terms prescribed in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 under § 3212.25, and for leases issued in response to applications pending on that date for which the lessee does not make an election under § 3200.8(b), the royalty rate is the rate prescribed in the lease instrument.
( c ) For purposes of this section, direct use of geothermal resources includes generation of electricity that is not sold commercially and that is used solely for the operation of a facility unrelated to commercial electrical generation.
PPLLAACCEE RR CCOO

SSAACC RRAAMMEE NNTTOO CC OO

80

65

8

7

8 9

9

7

8

7

0

5

6

8

3 4 1

5

2 5

7

11

4

6

11

3

16

13

20 24

34 35

10

22

18

15

12

31

31

27

15

23

26

33

19

14

18

10

17

30

22

32

21

17

16

19

14

20

28 30

17

23

12

36

29

24

13

25

2

18

19

1 6

20 21

9

6

18

17

20

29

5

32

19

4

36

25

1

24

13

16

12

26 25 27 30 28

T11N R6E

T10N R6E

T11N R7E

T10N R7E

T R T R

T11N R5E

City of Roseville Contractor's Service Area

District Boundary

Exhibit A

Contract No. 14-06-200-3474A-LTR1

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

353-202-4 Date: October 27, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\city_of_roseville\city_of_roseville.mxd 0 0.5 1 2

Miles
§ 3802.4-2 Access. ( a ) An operator is entitled to non-exclusive access to his mining operations consistent with provisions of the United States mining laws and Departmental regulations.
( b ) In approving access as part of a plan of operations, the authorized officer shall specify the location of the access route, the design, construction, operation and maintenance standards, means of transportation, and other conditions necessary to prevent impairment of wilderness suitability, protect the environment, the public health or safety, Federal property and economic interests, and the interests of other lawful users of adjacent lands or lands traversed by the access route. The authorized officer may also require the operator to utilize existing access routes in order to minimize the number of separate rights-of-way, and, if practicable, to construct access routes within a designated transportation and utility corridor. When commercial hauling is involved and the use of an existing access route is required, the authorized officer may require the operator to make appropriate arrangements for use and maintenance.
```

                         SEAVIEW VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                                     EXHIBIT
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                              Quarter                Quarter          Nine Months     Nine Months
                                            Ended Sept. 30,      Ended Sept. 30,       Ended            Ended
                                                2000                  1999         Sept. 30, 2000     Sept. 30,1999
                                           ----------------      ---------------   ---------------    --------------

Net income....................              $  (655,507)            $  9,845        $(1,683,468)      $  46,949

Shares:

Basic weighted average number of
    shares outstanding.............          13,398,948            6,430,000        11,284,185        6,430,000
Additional shares adjusted-under nonvested
    stock for diluted earnings per share..            0            2,586,282                 0        2,622,822
                                          ----------------      ---------------   ---------------    --------------

Diluted weighted average number
    of shares outstanding..                  13,398,948            9,016,282        11,284,185        9,052,822

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income...............................  $       (.05)         $      .002      $       (.15)      $     .007

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income...............................  $       (.05)         $      .001      $       (.15)      $     .005
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 3, 2013

NO. 03-13-00178-CV

Freddie L. House, Appellant

v.

Clauklin, LLC and Jamodi, LLC, Appellees

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS DAY came on to be submitted to this Court appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal in the 

above cause, and the Court having fully considered said motion, and being of the opinion that 

same should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that said 

motion is granted, and that the appeal is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision 

be certified below for observance.
# Publicatieblad C 219I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 219I |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 63e jaargang3 juli 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 219I

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

63e jaargang3 juli 2020

---

| Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informatie |
| | INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE |
| | Europese Commissie |
| 2020/C 219 I/01 | Kennisgeving over uitstel van de toepassing van de MiFIR-bepalingen inzake open toegang met betrekking tot op de beurs verhandelde derivaten | 1 |

Inhoud

Bladzijde

IV   Informatie

INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE

Europese Commissie

2020/C 219 I/01

Kennisgeving over uitstel van de toepassing van de MiFIR-bepalingen inzake open toegang met betrekking tot op de beurs verhandelde derivaten

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

IV Informatie

INFORMATIE AFKOMSTIG VAN DE INSTELLINGEN, ORGANEN EN INSTANTIES VAN DE EUROPESE UNIE

Europese Commissie

| 3.7.2020 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CI 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2020

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CI 219/1

---

Kennisgeving over uitstel van de toepassing van de MiFIR-bepalingen inzake open toegang met betrekking tot op de beurs verhandelde derivaten

(2020/C 219 I/01)

Artikel 54, lid 2, van Verordening (EU) nr. 600/2014 van het Europees Parlement en de Raad (1) (“MiFIR”) voorziet in een overgangsperiode waarin artikel 35 of 36 van MiFIR niet van toepassing is op centrale tegenpartijen (CTP’s) of handelsplatformen die hebben verzocht om gebruik te maken van deze overgangsregeling voor wat betreft op de beurs verhandelde derivaten.

Deze overgangsperiode loopt af op 3 juli 2020. Het huidige marktklimaat, met een hoge mate van onzekerheid en volatiliteit ten gevolge van de COVID‐19-pandemie, verhoogt de operationele risico’s voor CTP’s en handelsplatformen. Verhoogd risico vereist meer aandacht voor de bedrijfscontinuïteit en de beoordeling van toegangsverzoeken kan in het huidige klimaat de ordelijke werking van de markten voor handel in en clearing van op de beurs verhandelde derivaten ongunstig beïnvloeden. De medewetgevers zijn daarom overeengekomen de overgangsperiode te verlengen tot en met 3 juli 2021.

Bijgevolg moeten marktdeelnemers zich ervan bewust zijn dat de medewetgevers zijn overeengekomen de overgangsregelingen van artikel 54, lid 2, met betrekking tot artikel 35 of 36 van MiFIR met ingang van 4 juli 2020 te verlengen. Deze verlenging is van toepassing op de CTP’s of handelsplatformen die hun bevoegde autoriteit om toestemming hebben verzocht om gebruik te maken van deze overgangsregelingen voor wat betreft op de beurs verhandelde derivaten.

---

(1)  PB L 173 van 12.6.2014, blz. 84.

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVery Large Scale OptimizationThe purpose of this research under the NASA Small Business Innovative Research program was to develop algorithms and associated software to solve very large nonlinear, constrained optimization tasks. Key issues included efficiency, reliability, memory, and gradient calculation requirements. This report describes the general optimization problem, ten candidate methods, and detailed evaluations of four candidates. The algorithm chosen for final development is a modern recreation of a 1960s external penalty function method that uses very limited computer memory and computational time. Although of lower efficiency, the new method can solve problems orders of magnitude larger than current methods. The resulting BIGDOT software has been demonstrated on problems with 50,000 variables and about 50,000 active constraints. For unconstrained optimization, it has solved a problem in excess of 135,000 variables. The method includes a technique for solving discrete variable problems that finds a "good" design, although a theoretical optimum cannot be guaranteed. It is very scalable in that the number of function and gradient evaluations does not change significantly with increased problem size. Test cases are provided to demonstrate the efficiency and reliability of the methods and software.Document ID20020070545Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsVanderplaats, Garrett*(Vanderplaats Research and Development, Inc. Colorado Springs, CO United States)*Townsend, James C.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 2002Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2002-211768NAS 1.26:211768Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 253-02-98-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-00102Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020070545.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 508.62

 508.88

 508.79

 508.83

 508.74

 509.37

 509.59

 508.99

 508.66

 508.66

 508.36

 508.59

 509.20

 509.36

 508.86

 508.60

 508.92

 508.86

 508.90

 509.05

 509.04

 509.18

 508.43

 508.10

 508.10

 507.86

 508.04

 506.79

 506.50

 506.72

 65,252

 65,572

 65,461

 65,511

 65,400

 66,182

 66,456

 65,708

 65,301

 65,301

 64,932

 65,215

 65,970

 66,169

 65,548

 65,228

 65,622

 65,548

 65,597

 65,782

 65,770

 65,945

 65,018

 64,612

 64,612

 64,319

 64,538

 63,026

 62,680

 62,943

STORAGE

-320

+320

-111

+50

-111

+782

+274

-748

-407

+0

-369

+283

+755

+199

-621

-320

+394

-74

+49

+185

-12

+175

-927

-406

+0

-293

+219

-1,512

-346

+263

CHANGE

1,373

1,703

1,425

1,449

1,262

1,680

1,531

1,087

1,346

1,535

1,285

1,584

1,813

1,476

1,012

1,141

1,460

1,139

1,154

1,148

1,033

1,234

751

974

1,200

1,024

1,289

380

922

942

INFLOW

 1,518

 1,528

 1,469

 1,411

 1,304

 1,271

 1,377

 1,449

 1,535

 1,521

 1,459

 1,427

 1,359

 1,360

 1,311

 1,290

 1,250

 1,164

 1,120

 1,045

 1,029

 1,133

 1,203

 1,166

 1,187

 1,160

 1,168

 1,132

 1,084

 799

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 59

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 16

 14

 12

 13

 14

 15

 16

 15

 16

 14

 12

 14

 14

 16

 14

 12

 11

 12

 9

 10

 10

 13

 15

 13

 13

 12

 11

 10

 12

 10

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2021 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 10/01/2021

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2,629 37,352 38,229 0 59 388

ACRE-FEET -2,629 74,088 75,827 0 117 770

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 75,827

SPILL 0 75,944

 65,572

OUTLET 117

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,362

 1,692

 1,409

 1,443

 1,279

 1,660

 1,492

 1,112

 1,352

 1,510

 1,278

 1,572

 1,814

 1,471

 991

 1,151

 1,452

 1,127

 1,137

 1,159

 1,049

 1,225

 757

 984

 1,194

 1,027

 1,282

 399

 937

 927

 37,244

 73,873

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM NEW MELONES PAN.
#### Genevieve B. Lalor, Respondent, v. John H. Lalor, Appellant.

Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          47,216
<SECURITIES>                                   152,486
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,060
<INVENTORY>                                     45,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               298,629
<PP&E>                                          65,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 339,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,529
<OTHER-SE>                                     308,615
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   339,859
<SALES>                                        112,878
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,878
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,889
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,943
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,943
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73


</TABLE>
#### Helena Lindner, Respondent, v. Clarence E. Hopkins and Another, Appellants.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to an application at Special Term. *(Hansen*v. *Walsh,*117 App. Div. 39.) Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ.
#### § 3453.3 Approval.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Brett
M. Clark, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of General Environmental Management, Inc. for the quarterly period ending
June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of General Environmental
Management, Inc. of Nevada.




/s/
      Brett M. ClarkBrett
      M. Clark
                Vice
      President of Finance,Chief
      Financial Officer
                August
      14, 2008