alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#####  

**Exhibit 31**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer				Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act				As Adopted Pursuant to				Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

			I, Atsushi Maki, certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Amanasu Environment Corporation;
-  					Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a					material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,					in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading					with respect to the period covered by this annual report;				 
-  					Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included					in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,					results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented					in this annual report;				 
-  					I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures					(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:				 
							designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material							information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,							is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the							period in which this annual report is being prepared;						
							evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and							procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this							annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and						
							presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness							of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of							the Evaluation Date;						

-  					I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors					and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the					equivalent function):				 
							all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls							which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,							summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's							auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and						
							any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees							who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and						

-  					I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant					changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect					internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including					any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.				 

 Dated: April 13, 2007
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 18, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00157

- CV

IN RE Angie Leigh STRICKLAND

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On March 20, 2015

, relator A ngie Leigh Strickland filed a petition for writ of mandamus

with a motion for stay of the trial court’s order . The court ha s considered relator’s petition and

the response filed on behalf of the real party in interest and is of the opinion that relator is not

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). Th e court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

The real party in interest’s motion for leave to file a late response, filed April 13, 2015, is

GRANTED.

The temporary stay previously issued by this court on March 27, 2015 , is LIFTED.

It is so ORDERED o n May 18, 2015

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14

- 557

- CCL, styled In the Interest of F.S. and E.B., Children , pending in

the County Court at Law, Kendall County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Peden presiding.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 311

 318

 363

 418

 482

 525

 558

 582

 616

 641

 646

 659

 658

 666

 669

 675

 673

 671

 676

 682

 706

 713

 709

 706

 708

 717

 707

 707

 711

 712

 702

 296

 306

 319

 356

 422

 484

 525

 538

 575

 605

 638

 643

 649

 651

 656

 663

 664

 658

 665

 672

 678

 701

 697

 697

 702

 701

 695

 697

 693

 692

 635

 307

 309

 343

 397

 462

 506

 543

 568

 597

 630

 642

 652

 652

 660

 664

 670

 669

 665

 671

 677

 691

 708

 703

 702

 704

 708

 698

 700

 698

 697

 669

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 1, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
No. 12,883.

#### State Compensation Insurance Fund *v.*Industrial Commission et al.

(3 P. [2d] 414)

Decided September 21, 1931.

Mr. Harold Clark Thompson, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Clarence L. Ireland, Attorney General, Mr. Arthur L. Olson, Assistant, Mr. Waldo Riffenburg, for defendants in erior.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Butler

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The referee awarded compensation to the widow and minor children of Duane C. Kelso. On review, the Industrial Commission also awarded them compen*427sation, and that award was affirmed by a judgment of the district court. The State Compensation Fund seeks a reversal of the judgment.

Kelso was in the employ of the State Agricultural College. He performed the duties of computor and compiler of data, and also performed other duties in connection with its experimental station. He lived about 3% miles distant from the college. He owned two automobiles ; one a small truck, the other a large automobile. He rode to and from the college, sometimes in the former and sometimes in the latter. He was requested by the one under whose direction he was working to bring his truck on the morning of June 12,1930, for use in hauling some gravel for a concrete job at or near the laboratory. Pursuant to that request, or direction, he started on that morning to drive his truck to the place of work. While on his way he met with an accident that resulted in his death. Because of some defect in the steering apparatus of the truck, or because of the presence of loose gravel upon the highway, or because of both conditions, the truck overturned, fatally injuring Kelso.

In *Industrial Commission v.*Anderson, 69 Colo. 147, 169 Pac. 135, L. R. A. 1918F, 885, we said: “By the great weight of authority it appears, in the absence of special circumstances bringing the accident within the scope of the employment, that no compensation is recoverable by a workman who is injured while on his way to or from his work.” In the present case there were special circumstances that justified the finding that Kelso sustained injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. At the time of the accident Kelso was performing an act requested by his employer, for the direct benefit of his employer, and in the furtherance of the employer’s business. In the circumstances, the request, in effect, was a direction, or order, by the employer to the employee; and Kelso was fatally injured while in the very act of doing what he was thus directed, or ordered, to do. The referee and the commission were right in *428awarding compensation, and the district court properly affirmed the commission’s award.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit D

Phantom 2 Vision Pilot Training Guide V1.0

Please download Exhibit D for review @

download.dji­innovations.com
EXHIBIT 32.

                Certifications Pursuant to U. S. C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial officer of Community Bankshares,  Inc., each hereby certifies that, to
the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form  10-Q of the  issuer  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of Sections  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

August 11, 2004


/s/ E. J. Ayers, Jr.
--------------------------------------------
E. J. Ayers, Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ William W. Traynham
--------------------------------------------
William W. Traynham
President and Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-2605

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Carlos Rodriguez, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED]

Chester Earl Scott, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 7, 2000

Filed: February 8, 2000

___________

Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Rodriguez, a federal inmate, appeals the denial of his "motion for

discovery of the character of the court." Having carefully reviewed the record, we

conclude his motion was properly denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §871. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 85–395, §1, May 9, 1958, 72 Stat. 105, which related to membership roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Walter A. Rosner, Respondent, v. Globe Valve Corporation, Appellant. Walter A. Rosner, Respondent, v. Kokomo Sanitary Pottery Corporation, Appellant. Walter A. Rosner, Respondent, v. Woodbridge Sanitary Pottery Corporation, Appellant.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, T. Gaylon Layfield, III, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Xenith Bankshares, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |  |  |                              
|----------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|May 1, 2017 |  |  |  | /s/ T. Gaylon Layfield, III  
|            |  |  |  | T. Gaylon Layfield, III      
|            |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|            |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)



22
### §993. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 87–775, §3, Oct. 9, 1962, 76 Stat. 776, which related to time for filing of claims, reversion of funds upon failure to file, and use of reverted funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, James A. Tracy, certifythat:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofVision-Sciences, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in the report;

 

4.  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
|   |             |   | /s/ James A.  Tracy      |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
| Dated: | August 14,  2003 |   | James A  Tracy           |
|   |             |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT NO. 11

CANYON RESOURCES CORPORATION
CALCULATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY-DILUTED
EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Three Months Ended March 31
                                                                1997                  1996
                                                             ----------            ----------
<S>                                                          <C>                   <C>       
Computation for Statement of Income (A)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment to net (loss) per statements
  of income to amount used in earnings
  per share computation:
     (Loss) before extraordinary items                        ($310,700)            ($828,200)
      Add-interest on  convertible debentures,
        net of tax effect                                            --                   (B)
                                                             ----------            ----------
Net (loss), as adjusted                                       ($310,700)            ($828,200)
                                                             ==========            ==========

Adjustment to weighted average shares outstanding
  to amount used in earnings per share
  computation:
      Weighted average shares outstanding                    37,538,400            27,272,000
      Add-Shares issuable from assumed exercise of
      convertible debentures                                         --                   (B)
      Add-Shares issuable from assumed exercise
      of options and warrants                                       (B)                   (B)
                                                             ----------            ----------

Weighted average shares outstanding, as adjusted             37,538,400            27,272,000
                                                             ==========            ==========

  Net (loss)  per common share                                   ($0.01)               ($0.03)
                                                             ==========            ==========
</TABLE>

(A)  This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item
     601(b)(11) although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB
     Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.

(B)  Effect is antidilutive, so amounts are not included in the earnings loss
     per share calculation.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 4, 2021

t0601 

# Order

Clerk 

### June 4, 2021

157738

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157738

COA: 335862

Kent CC: 03

- 004460

- FC

DEMARIOL DONTAYE BOYKIN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to sch edule oral

argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The appellant shall file a supplemental

brief addressing: (1) whether the Court of Appeals correctly held in People v Wines , 323

Mich App 343 (2018), rev’d in nonrelevant part 506 Mich 954 (2020), that trial courts must

consider the distinctive attributes of youth, such as those discussed in Miller v Alabama , 567

US 460 (2012), when sentencing a minor to a term of years pursuant to MCL 769.25a; (2) if

Wines was correctly decided, whether sentencing judges have an obligation to explicitly set

forth their analysis of how the defendant’s age impacted their sentencing discretion when

proceeding under MCL 769.25a or MCL 769.25; and (3) if Wines applies to this ca se, whether the trial court complied with its requirements, and if it did not, what more the court

was required to do. The appellant’s brief shall be filed by September 27, 2021, with no

extensions except upon a showing of good cause. In the brief, citat ions to the record must

provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file

a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. A reply, if

any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 da ys of being served with the appellee’s brief.

The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

We further direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same

future session of the Court when it will hear o ral argument in People v Tate (Docket No.

158695).

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense

Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups

interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for

permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
<PAGE>

[Vision Sciences logo]
                                                             EXHIBIT 10.1
July 18, 1997

Mr. James A. Tracy
44 Gammons Road
Newton, MA  02168

Dear Jim:

I am pleased to offer you employment with Vision-Sciences ("the Company"),
pursuant to the following terms and conditions:

Title:         Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate
               Controller

Salary:        $90,000 per annum, payable in accordance with the Company's
               normal payroll schedules.

Effective
Date:          July 21, 1997

Benefits:      You will be entitled to participate in the Company's standard
               benefits package, including health insurance and the Company's
               401K plan.

Vacation:      You will be eligible for vacation in accordance with the
               Company's standard vacation policy.

Options:       You will receive a grant of stock options for 50,000 shares of
               the common stock of Vision-Sciences, Inc. at an exercise price
               equal to the price as of the close of business today with vesting
               as follows:

- 12,500 shares vesting on July 21, 1998
- 12,500 shares vesting on July 21, 1999
- 12,500 shares vesting on July 21, 2000
- 12,500 shares vesting on July 21, 2001

In the event that Vision-Sciences is merged into or acquired by another entity,
all options shall vest immediately. All other provisions of the Vision-Sciences
1990 Stock Option Plan shall apply to this grant.
<PAGE>

Mr. James A. Tracy
July 18, 1997
Page 2

Termination:   Your employment may be terminated by the Company for cause and by
               either party upon 90 days written notice. In the event the
               Company terminates other than for cause, it will provide a lump
               sum severance payment equal to three month's salary upon
               termination and will maintain all benefits for a period of three
               months from termination.

Yours truly,

/s/ Katsumi Oneda

Katsumi Oneda
President/CEO/Chairman

Accepted:

/s/ James T. Tracy                           Date: 7/18/97
------------------------------                     ------------------------
James A. Tracy