alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of microHelix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tyram H. Pettit,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.






----------------------------------
Tyram H. Pettit
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
April 7, 2003


                                      -1-
#### Copland-Raymond Company, Respondent, v. Elias Gottfried and Another, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
EX-10.8





 Exhibit 10.8 

Context Therapeutics Inc. 
 2021
Long -Term Performance Incentive Plan 
 Stock Grant Agreement 
  

	1.	 The Company hereby grants
                     shares of $0.001 par value per share of Common Stock (the “Stock Grant”) of Context Therapeutics Inc. (the
“Company”), to                      (the “Grantee”), subject to the terms and provisions of the Context Therapeutics Inc. 2021
Long-Term Performance Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) insofar as the same are applicable to shares of Stock granted thereunder. The terms and provisions of the Plan are incorporated herein by reference. 



 

	2.	 The Stock Grant is fully vested as of the date hereof. 



 

	3.	 The Stock Grant is subject to applicable tax withholding. As a condition to receipt of this grant, to the
extent such withholding obligations exceed Grantee’s other compensation due from the Company, Grantee agrees to remit to the Company such additional amounts in cash as are necessary to satisfy such required withholding. Any and all withholding
obligations may be settled with shares of Stock already owned by Grantee or by the withholding of shares of Stock granted herein, subject to the terms and conditions determined by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors
which administers the Plan. 


  

	4.	 The Company shall deliver to Grantee the applicable number of shares of Common Stock of the Company following
Grantee’s satisfaction of all applicable tax withholding obligations and Grantee shall have all rights of a shareholder with respect to such delivered shares. 



 

	5.	 All notices required to be given hereunder shall be mailed by registered or certified mail to the Company to
the attention of its Secretary, at                      and to Grantee at Grantee’s address as it appears on the Company’s books and
records unless either of said parties has duly notified the other in writing of a change in address. 


  

									
		 	GRANTEE:	  		  	CONTEXT THERAPEUTICS INC.
					
		 	
                     
                    
	  		  	By:	 	
                     
                                        



 Grantee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, and represents that he/she is familiar with the terms and provisions
thereof, and hereby accepts the Option subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan insofar as they relate to Stock Options granted thereunder. Grantee agrees hereby to accept as binding, conclusive, and final all decisions or
interpretations of the Committee upon any questions arising under the Plan or the grant of Stock. Grantee authorizes the Company to withhold in accordance with applicable law from any compensation payable to him/her any taxes required to be
withheld by Federal, state, or local law as a result of the exercise of the Option. 
  

			
	By:	 	
                     
                    



  
 1
#### § 35.43 Collection of civil penalties and assessments.

Sections 3806 and 3808(b) of title 31, U.S. Code, authorize actions for collection of civil penalties and assessments imposed under this part and specify the procedures for such actions.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of 24Holdings  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Michael  Neame,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Michael Neame
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Michael Neame
                                                     President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 15, 2002
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nexstar Broadcasting,
Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 31, 2004



/S/    PERRY A. SOOKPerry A. Sook President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 50764 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
FLORENCE MONROE LOPEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6 :1 1

- CR

- 1 04

- 3

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Florence Monroe Lopez, federal prisoner # 79440

- 280, was convicted in
2011 of a drug conspiracy and sentenced to 168 months of imprisonment. He filed a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines; the district court denied the motion, and this court dismissed Lopez’s appeal as frivolous. Lopez then filed a second Section 3582(c)(2) motion based on Amendment 782,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 31, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-50764 Document: 00515181897 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2019No. 18

- 50764

2 which the district court also denied. He now appeals th e denial of that second
motion. We affirm. We review the denial of Lopez’s Section 3582(c)(2) motion for an abuse of
discretion. United States v. Henderson , 636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011). Because we can determine from the record that the district c ourt implicitly
considered Lopez’s Section 3582(c)(2) motion and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors , his challenge to the sufficiency of the district court’s explanation is unpersuasive. See id. at 718. His argument that a reduction
was warranted in light of the Section 3553(a) factors, which include his postsentencing conduct, is insufficient to demonstrate an abuse of discretion. See id. at 7 17; United States v. Evans , 587 F.3d 667, 673 & n n .9

– 10 (5th Cir. 2009). Finally, Lopez cites no authority in support of his argument that the district court was required to prepare a new presentence report. AFFIRMED. Case: 18-50764 Document: 00515181897 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/31/2019
§ 3206.11 What must BLM do before issuing a lease? For all leases, BLM must: ( a ) Determine that the land is available; and
( b ) Determine that your lease development will not have a significant adverse impact on any significant thermal feature within any of the following units of the National Park System: ( 1 ) Mount Rainier National Park;
( 2 ) Crater Lake National Park;
( 3 ) Yellowstone National Park;
( 4 ) John D. Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway;
( 5 ) Bering Land Bridge National Preserve;
( 6 ) Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve;
( 7 ) Katmai National Park;
( 8 ) Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve;
( 9 ) Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve;
( 10 ) Lake Clark National Park and Preserve;
( 11 ) Hot Springs National Park;
( 12 ) Big Bend National Park (including that portion of the Rio Grande National Wild Scenic River within the boundaries of Big Bend National Park);
( 13 ) Lassen Volcanic National Park;
( 14 ) Hawaii Volcanoes National Park;
( 15 ) Haleakala National Park;
( 16 ) Lake Mead National Recreation Area; and
( 17 ) Any other significant thermal features within National Park System units that the Secretary may add to the list of these features, in accordance with 30 U.S.C. 1026(a)(3).
### §640d–15. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §16, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1720, which provided for payment of fair rental value for use of lands subsequent to date of partition, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3281.6 What action will BLM take after reviewing a proposed unit area designation? ( a ) BLM will approve the unit area designation in writing and notify the prospective unit operator once we determine that: ( 1 ) We have received the information required at § 3281.2;
( 2 ) Information available to BLM documents that the area is geologically appropriate for unitization; and
( 3 ) Unitization is appropriate to conserve the natural resources of a geothermal reservoir, field, or like area, or part thereof.
( b ) BLM will notify a prospective unit operator in writing if we do not designate a proposed unit area.
### §3114. Postgraduation recruitment, education and training programs

#### (a) Postgraduation recruitment

The Secretary shall establish and maintain a program to attract Indian and Alaska Native professional foresters and forester technicians who have already graduated from their course of postsecondary or graduate education for employment in either the Bureau of Indian Affairs forestry programs or, subject to the approval of the tribe, in tribal forestry programs. According to such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, such program shall provide for the employment of Indian and Alaska Native professional foresters or forestry technicians in exchange for the Secretary's assumption of the employee's outstanding student loans. The period of employment shall be determined by the amount of the loan that is assumed.

#### (b) Postgraduate intergovernmental internships

For the purposes of training, skill development and orientation of Indian, Alaska native,1 and Federal forestry personnel, and the enhancement of tribal and Bureau of Indian Affairs forestry programs, the Secretary shall establish and actively conduct a program for the cooperative internship of Federal, Indian, and Alaska Native forestry personnel. Such program shall—

(1) for agencies within the Department of the Interior—

(A) provide for the internship of Bureau of Indian Affairs, Alaska Native, and Indian forestry employees in the forestry-related programs of other agencies of the Department of the Interior, and

(B) provide for the internship of forestry personnel from other Department of the Interior agencies within the Bureau of Indian Affairs and, with the consent of the tribe, within tribal forestry programs;

(2) for agencies not within the Department of the Interior, provide, pursuant to an interagency agreement, internships within the Bureau of Indian Affairs and, with the consent of the tribe, within a tribal forestry program of other forestry personnel of such agencies who are above their sixth year of Federal service;

(3) provide for the continuation of salary and benefits for participating Federal employees by their originating agency;

(4) provide for salaries and benefits of participating Indian and Alaska Native forestry employees by the host agency; and

(5) provide for a bonus pay incentive at the conclusion of the internship for any participant.

#### (c) Continuing education and training

The Secretary shall maintain a program within the Division of Forestry of the Bureau of Indian Affairs for the ongoing education and training of Bureau of Indian Affairs, Alaska Native, and Indian forestry personnel. Such program shall provide for—

(1) orientation training for Bureau of Indian Affairs forestry personnel in tribal-Federal relations and responsibilities;

(2) continuing technical forestry education for Bureau of Indian Affairs, Alaska Native, and tribal forestry personnel; and

(3) developmental training of Indian and Alaska Native personnel in forest land based enterprises and marketing.

(Pub. L. 101–630, title III, §315, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4542.)

1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22158]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--the Society for Biomolecular Screening, Inc. 
(``SBS'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 1, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), The Society for 
Biomolecular Screening, Inc. (``SBS'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization is: The Society for 
Biomolecular Screening, Inc. Danbury, CT. The nature and scope of SBS' 
standard development activities are: Many science-based industries have 
implemented a High Throughput Screening (HTS) approach for discovery 
activities. HTS requires that automated devices and full robotic 
systems be used for this work. These devices and systems cost from tens 
of thousands of dollars to millions of dollars. The basic tool for this 
work is the microtiter plate (MTP) and as such, it is economically 
critical that these devices/systems work in a seamless manner with this 
tool as supplied by different manufacturers. However, each manufacturer 
had originally developed MTPs with slightly different dimensions and 
features to the extent that these plates performed poorly with 
automation. Laboratory users found it frustrating to try to use 
different plates with their equipment and often experienced significant 
financial losses when doing so. Manufacturers of automated devices 
tried to build in features that allowed for defining different plates 
from different manufacturers but there was only so much variation that 
could be accommodated and these changes were driving costs upwards. In 
1995, The Society for Biomolecular Screening, Inc. formed a working 
group that brought together all of the interested parties, 
(manufacturers of MTPs, automated device manufacturers and users) to 
establish standards for microtiter plates that would provide reliable 
use with all automated equipment and robotics. These standards need to 
address the various densities of the MTP including 96, 384, and 1536 
since it would be expected that the same equipment could work with 
various formats but not necessarily all formats to contains costs.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-22158 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### William Breland, Appellant, v. Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against defendant, on the ground that it is against the weight of the evidence, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
§ 3137.90 Who must operate wells that do not meet the productivity criteria? ( a ) If a well not meeting the productivity criteria was drilled before the unit was formed and is not included in the participating area, the operator of the well at the time the unit was formed may continue as operator.
( b ) As unit operator, you must continue to operate wells drilled after unit formation not meeting the productivity criteria unless BLM approves a change in the designation of operator for those wells.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-11281

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PHONG HUU TRUONG

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CR-58-1

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Phong Huu Truong

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Truong has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
### Larger invertebrate fossils of the Woodbine formation (Cenomanian) of Texas, with decapod crustaceans from the Woodbine formation of Texas

By: L. W. StephensonH. B. Stenzel

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp242

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21958]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated May 5, 2004 and published in the Federal Register 
on May 26, 2004, (69 FR 29978-29979), Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals, 
Inc., 2820 N. Normandy Driver, Petersburg, Virginia 23805, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as an importer of Phenylacetone (8501), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in Schedule II.
    The company plans to import Phenylacetone for the bulk manufacture 
of amphetamine.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the 
registration of Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals, Inc. to import the 
basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public 
interest and with United States obligations under international 
treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this 
time. DEA has investigated Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals, Inc. to 
ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public 
interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the 
company's physical security systems, verification of the company's 
compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's 
background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 
958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company 
is granted registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled 
substance listed.

    Dated: September 16, 2004.
William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-21958 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-1513

_____________________________

SAMUEL PARAMORE,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction.

August 8, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Samuel Paramore, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
### §980. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 87–629, §10, Sept. 5, 1962, 76 Stat. 431, which related to termination of Federal trust relationship of the United States to the tribe and its members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.