alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### PART IV—SPECIAL RULES

Sec.
[1051.
Repealed.]
1052.
Basis established by the Revenue Act of 1932 or 1934 or by the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.
1053.
Property acquired before March 1, 1913.
1054.
Certain stock of Federal National Mortgage Association.
1055.
Redeemable ground rents.
[1056, 1057. Repealed.]
1058.
Transfers of securities under certain agreements.
1059.
Corporate shareholder's basis in stock reduced by nontaxed portion of extraordinary dividends.
1059A.
Limitation on taxpayer's basis or inventory cost in property imported from related persons.
1060.
Special allocation rules for certain asset acquisitions.
1061.
Partnership interests held in connection with performance of services.
1062.
Cross references.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13309(b), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2131, added items 1061 and 1062 and struck out former item 1061 "Cross references".

**2014**—Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §221(a)(78), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4049, struck out item 1051 "Property acquired during affiliation".

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §886(b)(1)(B), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1641, struck out item 1056 "Basis limitation for player contracts transferred in connection with the the sale of a franchise".

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title XI, §1131(c)(5), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 980, struck out item 1057 "Election to treat transfer to foreign trust, etc., as taxable exchange".

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title VI, §641(b), title XII, §1248(b), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2283, 2584, added items 1059A and 1060 and renumbered former item 1060 as 1061.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §53(d), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 568, added item 1059 and renumbered former item 1059 as 1060.

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–345, §2(d)(2), Aug. 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 483, added item 1058 and renumbered former item 1058 as 1059.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title II, §212(a)(2), title X, 1015(c), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1546, 1618, added items 1056 and 1057 and renumbered former item 1056 as 1058.

**1963**—Pub. L. 88–9, §1(d), Apr. 10, 1963, 77 Stat. 8, added item 1055 and renumbered former item 1055 as 1056.

**1960**—Pub. L. 86–779, §8(c), Sept. 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 1003, renumbered former item 1054 as 1055 and added new item 1054.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology of the Elkton area, Virginia

#### Professional Paper 230

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**     
                             (html)
- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 6**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp230 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:15
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                November 13, 2002

                                    Dice Inc.
             ------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




                 Delaware                 0-25107             13-3899472
     ---------------------------- ------------------------ ----------------
     (State or Other Jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer
                of Incorporation)      Identification           Number)


                     3 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10016
               ---------------------------------------------------
               (Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)


                                 (212) 725 6550
              ----------------------------------------------------
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)




<PAGE>

ITEM 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure

On November 13, 2002, the Company received a NASDAQ Staff Determination
indicating that the Company was not in compliance with the $15 million market
value of publicly held shares requirement for continued listing set forth in
Marketplace Rule 4450(b)(3) and that this additional issue will be considered,
together with the Staff Determination issued on October 8, 2002 regarding the
Company's $3.00 bid price deficiency, at the Company's hearing before a NASDAQ
Listing Qualification Panel, currently scheduled for November 21, 2002. On
November 14, 2002, the Company issued a press release announcing its receipt of
the notice. The full text of the press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1
hereto.

ITEM 7. Exhibits.

Exhibit
Number            Description
------            -----------

99.1              Press Release dated November 14, 2002.


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



                                         DICE INC.



                                        By:/s/ Brian P. Campbell
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:   Brian P. Campbell, Esq.
                                           Title:  Vice President and General
                                                   Counsel



Dated: November 14, 2002
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A


                               ULTRONICS CORPORATION
             (exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

         NEVADA                                             87-0485313
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                          Identification Number)

3098 South Highland Drive, Suite 460
Salt Lake City, Utah                                        84106
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (801) 485-7775

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

     The undersigned  registrant  hereby amends the following  items,  financial
statements,  exhibits or other portions of its Form 10-Q dated August 7, 1996 as
set forth in the page attached hereto:

                      Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule




<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                 ULTRONICS CORPORATION


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ Krista Nielson
                                 Krista Nielson, President, CEO and Director


Dated: November 11, 1996          s/ David R. Yeaman
                                 David R. Yeaman, Secretary/Treasurer,
                                                  CFO and Director
#### M. F. Loughran et al., Appellees, v. John A. Gorman, Appellant.

Gen. No. 5549.

Appeals and eeeoes&emdash;when, *affirmance results by operation of law.*If but two of tbe justices participate upon tbe bearing of an appeal and they disagree, an affirmance by operation of law results.

*114Foreclosure. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Will county; the Hon. Dobrance Dibell, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1911.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 13, 1912.

J. L. 0 ’Donnell, T. P. Donovan and J. A. Brat, for appellant.

Barr, McNaughton *&*Barr, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Mr. Presiding Justice Dibell tried this case in the court below and therefore took no part in its consideration here. The other members of the court have given the case a careful examination and are divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed. The decree is therefore affirmed by operation of law.

The authorities for the affirmance of a judgment by an equally divided court are collected in Binder v. Langhorst, 139 Ill. App. 493.

*Decree affirmed.*
Order filed September 27, 2022

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 22

- 00611

- CV

___________ KOMERICA POST, LLC AND DONG WOOK YANG , Appellant s

V.

JAI SUNG BYUN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris C o unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 12612

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter

for the 295th District Court informed this court that appellant had not reque s ted

preparation of the reporter’ s record. On August 24, 2022 , the clerk of this court

notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not

require a reporter ’ s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this

court with proof of a request as well as payme nt for the record. See T ex . R. App

.
P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply.Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within tw enty

days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to do so, the appeal is subject to

dismissal witho ut further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P.
42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Poissant and Wilson.
#### William H. Parish, as Administrator, etc., of Earl Parish, Deceased, Appellant, v. Byron D. Juckett, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
#### Harry Freund, Respondent, v. Zephyr Laundry Machinery Company, Defendant. Credit America Corporation, Third Party, Appellant.

Present—Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
**Exhibit 10.7**

 

**AMENDMENT TO THE 2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

Approved April 28, 2005 

 

Section 3 of the Max Re Capital Ltd. 2000 Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) is hereby deleted and the following shall be inserted in lieu thereof: 

 

“3. Shares Subject to the Plan. Subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 17, the total of the number of sharesof Common Stock which shall be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan shall not exceed 8,000,000; provided, that, for purposes of this limitation, any shares subject to an Option which is canceled or expires without exerciseshall again become available for Award under the Plan. Upon forfeiture of Awards in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and the terms and conditions of the Award, such shares shall no longer be counted against any determination of the numberof shares available under the Plan and shall be available for subsequent Awards. Shares tendered by a Participant to pay all or part of the option price of an Option or to pay all or part of the taxes associated with the exercise of such Option orshares of Common Stock which are withheld upon exercise of an Option which would have otherwise been issued upon exercise of such Option shall be again available for issuance pursuant to Nonqualified Stock Options under the Plan. Subject toadjustment in accordance with Section 17, no Participant shall be granted, during any calendar year, Options to purchase more than 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock. Common Stock available for issue or distribution under the Plan shall beauthorized and unissued shares or shares reacquired by the Company in any manner.” 

 

Section 5 of the Incentive Plan is hereby deleted and the following shall be inserted in lieu thereof: 

 

“5. Eligibility. Individuals eligible to receive Awards under the Plan shall be the officers, other employees, consultants, service providers anddirectors of the Company and its Subsidiaries and such other individuals who will become employees, consultants, service providers or directors of the Company and its Subsidiaries after the date of grant, in either case, as selected by theCommittee. In addition, all Non-Employee Directors shall be eligible to receive such Awards as the Committee may from time to time determine, as provided in Section 11 hereof.” 

 

Section 11 of the Incentive Plan is hereby deleted and the following shall be inserted in lieu thereof: 

 

 

(a) The Committee, or such other committee as the Board may designate, shall in its discretion authorize the grant of Awards to Non-EmployeeDirectors in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee, or such other designated committee, shall from time to time determine; provided that the granting of any Option hereunder shall be subject to Section 11(B).

 

(b) The purchase price for each Option granted under thisSection 11 to a Non-Employee Director shall be the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date of grant of the Option.”
### §640d–14. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §15, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1719; Pub. L. 96–305, §7, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 932; Pub. L. 100–666, §§4(b), 10, Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3930, 3934, which related to relocation housing, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3217.13 When does my communitization agreement go into effect? ( a ) Your communitization agreement is effective when BLM approves and signs it.
( b ) Before we approve the agreement: ( 1 ) All parties must sign the agreement; and
( 2 ) ( i ) We must determine that the tracts cannot be independently developed; and
( ii ) That the agreement is in the public interest.
(All Programs Except D&MC)

GENERAL OBLIGATION--BENEFiTS CONDITIONED UPON PAYMENT

(a) The obligation of the Contractor to pay the United States as provided

in this contract is a general obligation of the Contractor notwithstanding the mannerin

which the obligation may be distributed among the Contractor’s water users and

notwithstanding the default’of individual water users in their obligations to the

Contractor.

(b) The payment of charges becoming due hereunder is a condition

precedent to receiving benefits under this contract. The United States shall not make

water available to the Contractor through Project facilities during any period in which

the Contractor may be in arrears in the advance payment of [water rates] [any operation

and maintenance charges] due the United States [or in arrears for more than 12 months

in the payment of any construction charges due the United States]. The Contractor shall

not furnish water made available pursuant to this contract for lands or parties which are

in arrears in the advance payment of [waterrates] [operation and maintenance charges

or in arrears’more than 12 months in the payment of construction charges as] levied or

established by the Contractor.

Approved 2/22/71; Revised 11/84

Note: This article should be modified for Public Law 984 contracts when Federal

project water is not being furnished by omitting the second sentence in

Section (b) beginning with the words, ‘The United States shall...” It should

also be modified for 9(c)(2) and 9(e) type contracts by omitting reference to

both the operation and maintenance charges and construction charges and

substituting therefor payment of “water rates”. Alternative language show in

brackets ([]).

Not applicable in D&MC

M.22
(No. 804

Claimant awarded $203.46 with interest.)

#### First Trust & Savings Bank as Executor and Trustee Under the Last Will and Testament of Anthony H. Reed, Deceased Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 16, 1924.*

Inheritance *tax*— when *refund may be awarded*— See. *25.*Where an inheritance tax has been assessed against an estate at the highest rate > possible under Sec. 25, Inheritance Tax Law, and is paid, and afterwards a contingency happens whereby the estate is transferred to persons taxable at a less rate, and upon a petition being filed praying for the re-assessment of the tax it appeared that the state was not subject to a tax: *Held,*claimant entitled to a refund of the tax paid.

Moses, Rosenthal & Kennedy, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

First Trust & Savings Bank, a corporation of Chicago, Illinois, as executor and trustee under the last will and testament of Anthony H. Reed, deceased, brings this suit for a refund of inheritance taxes, and alleges in its declaration that an inheritance tax was assessed against the said estate by the county court of Cook county, Illinois, in the sum of $185.92, that the said tax was assessed at the highest possible rate, in accordance with the provisions of. Section 25 of the Illinois *31Inheritance Tax act; that on May 20, 1920, claimant, as executor and trustee, paid to the county collector of- said county the amount of said tax, together with interest at the rate of six (6) per cent per annum thereon, from the date of the death of said deceased to the date of payment, or a total of $203.46; that thereafter a contingency happened whereby the assets of said estate were transferred to persons taxable at a rate less than the rate imposed by the county court in arriving at the tax assessed as above indicated and set forth; that by reason of said contingency, the said estate became, and is subject to no inheritance tax.

On June 19,1924, the claimant filed a petition in the county court aforesaid asking for a re-assessment of the tax in said estate, and an order was accordingly entered on said date, re-assessing the inheritance tax in said estate, and finding the estate subject to no inheritance tax; that the following persons are entitled to such refund: Robert B. Reed, Ernest C. Reed, Elbert E. Reed, Hazel Robinson (formerly Hazel Reed) and Harold M. Reed, the children and heirs at law of said decedent, and beneficiaries of the trust created by the last will and testament of said decedent. It is clear from the reading of the copy of. the will and testament filed, and the findings and orders of the county court.of Cook county that the claimant is entitled a refund of amount claimed with interest as claimed.

The Attorney General filed demurrer, and also his consent in writing that claim be allowed as prayed for by claimant.

The court accordingly overrules demurrer and awards the claimant the sum of $203.46.
Double 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 21, 2014

No. 04-12-00841-CV

SCHUHARDT CONSULTING PROFIT SHARING PLAN, Allan P. Blosxom, III, Thomas 

O. Stoner, Stormy Night, LLC and TOS Ranch, LLC,

Appellants

v.

DOUBLE KNOBS MOUNTAIN RANCH, INC and Carlton E. Thompson,

Appellees

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-09-28311-CV

Honorable Mickey R. Pennington, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### §640d–4. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §5, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1714; Pub. L. 93–531, §30(a), as added Pub. L. 96–305, §11, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 934, which authorized certain recommendations and provided that they be construed as discretionary, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3142.30 Expiration.

Failure of the lessee to pay advance royalty within the time prescribed by the authorized officer, or failure of the lessee to comply with any other provisions of this subpart following the end of the primary term of the lease, will result in the automatic expiration of the lease as of the first of the month following notice to the lessee of its failure to comply. The lessee will remain subject to the requirement of applicable laws, regulations and lease terms which have not been met at the expiration of the lease.
§ 35.12 Notice of hearing. ( a ) When the ALJ receives the complaint and answer, the ALJ shall promptly serve a notice of hearing upon the defendant in the manner prescribed by § 35.8 of this part. At the same time, the ALJ shall send a copy of such notice to the representative for the Government.
( b ) Such notice shall include— ( 1 ) The time and place, and the nature of the hearing;
( 2 ) The legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held;
( 3 ) The matters of fact and law to be asserted;
( 4 ) A description of the procedures for the conduct of the hearing;
( 5 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the representative of the Government and of the defendant, if any; and
( 6 ) Such other matters as the ALJ deems appropriate.