alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### McWilliams-Rankin Company *v.*Thompson.

November 19, 1910.

Atkinson, J.

The bill of exceptions complains of the refusal of the judge to grant an interlocutory injunction and appoint a receiver. The defendant did not demur or answer, and the. decision was based on the uncontradicted allegations of the petition and evidence offered in support thereof. From these it appeared that the plaintiff received from the defendant three promissory notes, amounting in the aggregate to $50.54, each containing the usual homestead waiver; and that after-wards the defendant, being insolvent, and having no property except certain personalty consisting of a stock of goods of a perishable nature, caused it to be set apart as a homestead, and thereafter proceeded to sell the same to various persons who would consume the same, thus putting it out of the reach of the plaintiff. Without having a judgment or other lien, the suit was brought 'on the promissory notes. After allegations in substance as above set forth, the petition contained prayers for process, for a decree subjecting the property to the payment of the debt, that the defendant be enjoined from using or disposing of any of the property, and that a receiver be appointed to seize and hold the property subject to the judgment of the court, and that the plaintiff have such other equitable relief as might seem proper. *Eeld,*the judgment refusing to enjoin the defendant and appoint a receiver was not erroneous.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*425Petition for injunction. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior court. March 28, 1910.

*Oliver 0. Hancock,*for plaintiff.
# Euroopan unionin C 219I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 219I |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 63. vuosikerta3. heinäkuu 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 219I

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

63. vuosikerta3. heinäkuu 2020

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Tiedotteet |
| | EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET |
| | Euroopan komissio |
| 2020/C 219 I/01 | Ilmoitus rahoitusmarkkina-asetuksen avointa pääsyä koskevien säännösten soveltamisen lykkäämisestä pörssilistattujen johdannaisten osalta | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

IV   Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Euroopan komissio

2020/C 219 I/01

Ilmoitus rahoitusmarkkina-asetuksen avointa pääsyä koskevien säännösten soveltamisen lykkäämisestä pörssilistattujen johdannaisten osalta

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

IV Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Euroopan komissio

| 3.7.2020 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2020

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 219/1

---

Ilmoitus rahoitusmarkkina-asetuksen avointa pääsyä koskevien säännösten soveltamisen lykkäämisestä pörssilistattujen johdannaisten osalta

(2020/C 219 I/01)

Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetuksen (EU) N:o 600/2014 (1) (jäljempänä ’rahoitusmarkkina-asetus’) 54 artiklan 2 kohdassa säädetään siirtymäkaudesta, jonka aikana rahoitusmarkkina-asetuksen 35 artiklaa ei sovelleta sellaisiin keskusvastapuoliin tai 36 artiklaa ei sovelleta sellaisiin kauppapaikkoihin, jotka ovat pyytäneet lupaa soveltaa siirtymäjärjestelyä pörssilistattujen johdannaisten osalta.

Tämä siirtymäkausi päättyy 3. heinäkuuta 2020. Covid-19-pandemia on aiheuttanut merkittävää epävarmuutta ja volatiliteettia markkinoilla, mikä lisää keskusvastapuoliin ja kauppapaikkoihin kohdistuvia operatiivisia riskejä. Riskien lisääntyessä on huomio suunnattava erityisesti toiminnan jatkuvuuteen. Pääsyä koskevien pyyntöjen arvioinnilla voi nykytilanteessa olla kielteisiä vaikutuksia pörssilistattuja johdannaisia koskevien kaupankäynti- ja määrityspalvelujen markkinoiden moitteettomaan toimintaan. Sen vuoksi lainsäätäjät ovat päättäneet jatkaa siirtymäkautta 3. heinäkuuta 2021 saakka.

Markkinaosapuolten olisi näin ollen otettava huomioon, että lainsäätäjät ovat päättäneet jatkaa 4. heinäkuuta 2020 alkaen rahoitusmarkkina-asetuksen 54 artiklan 2 kohdassa tarkoitettuja siirtymäjärjestelyjä, jotka koskevat asetuksen 35 tai 36 artiklaa. Siirtymäkauden jatkaminen koskee niitä keskusvastapuolia tai kauppapaikkoja, jotka ovat esittäneet toimivaltaisille viranomaisilleen pyynnön saada soveltaa siirtymäjärjestelyä pörssilistattujen johdannaisten osalta.

---

(1)  EUVL L 173, 12.6.2014, s. 84.

---
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERREQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report of Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Angelica Berrie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

2.       The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 
|   | May 15, 2003                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                                      |
|   | /s/  ANGELICA  BERRIE           |
|   |                                      |
|   | Angelica  Berrie*Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. and will be retained by RussBerrie and Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
§ 3486.2 Notices and orders. ( a ) *Address of responsible party.* Before beginning operations, the operator/lessee shall inform the authorized officer in writing of the operator/lessee's post office address and the name and post office address of the superintendent or designated agent who will be in charge of the operations and who will act as the local representative of the operator/lessee. Thereafter, the authorized officer shall be informed of any changes.
( b ) *Receipt of notices and orders.* The operator/lessee shall be construed to have received all notices and orders that are mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the mine office or handed to a responsible official connected with the mine or exploration site for transmittal to the operator/lessee or his local representative.
### PART I—SPECIAL (OCCUPATIONAL) TAXES

Sec.
5801.
Imposition of tax.
5802.
Registration of importers, manufacturers, and dealers.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part I, act Aug. 16, 1964, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 721, and amended thereafter, consisted of sections 5801 to 5803, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 90–618, title II, §201, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1228.

#### Amendments

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10512(g)(2), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–450, substituted "Imposition of tax" for "Tax" in item 5801.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInvestigation of RF Emissions From Wireless Networks as a Threat to Avionic SystemsThe paper focuses on understanding and obtaining preliminary measurements of radiated field (RF) emissions of laptop/wireless local area network (WLAN) systems. This work is part of a larger research project to measure radiated emissions of wireless devices to provide a better understanding for potential interference with crucial aircraft avionics systems. A reverberation chamber data collection process is included, as well as recommendations for additional tests. Analysis of measurements from devices under test (DUTs) proved inconclusive for addressing potential interference issues. Continued effort is expected to result in a complete easily reproducible test protocol. The data and protocol presented here are considered preliminary.Document ID20020080731Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSalud, Maria Theresa P.*(Lockheed Martin Corp. Hampton, VA United States)*Williams, Reuben A.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2002Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:211941NASA/CR-2002-211941Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-00135PROJECT: RTOP 722-64-10-53Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020080731.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3474.1 Bonding requirements. ( a ) Before a lease may be issued, one of the following forms of lease bond shall be furnished: ( 1 ) Corporate surety bonds;
( 2 ) Cash bond; or
( 3 ) Personal lease bonds secured by negotiable U.S. bonds of a par value equal to the amount of the required surety bond, together with a power of attorney executed on a form approved by the Director.
( b ) The applicant or bidder shall file the lease bond in the proper office within 30 days of receiving notice. The lease bond shall be furnished on a form approved by the Director.
( c ) The bonding obligation for a new lease may be met by an adjustment to an existing LMU bond covering the other leases within the same LMU.
[44 FR 42643, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33151, July 30, 1982]
§ 3420.0-3 Authority. ( a ) The regulations in this part are issued under the authority of the statutes cited in § 3400.0-3 of this title.
( b ) The regulations in this part implement: ( 1 ) Primarily section 2(a) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended by sections 2 and 3 of the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act of 1976 (30 U.S.C. 201(a)); and
( 2 ) the Small Business Act of 1953, as amended (15 U.S.C. 631 *et seq.*).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     BIOETHICS, LTD.  June 30, 1997  financial  statements and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894560
<NAME>                        BIOETHICS, LTD.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
§ 3179.81 Well completion or recompletion flaring allowance. ( a ) Gas flared following well completion or recompletion is royalty-free under §§ 3179.41(b)(2) and 3179.42(b) until one of the following occurs: ( 1 ) Thirty days have passed since the beginning of the flowback following completion or recompletion, except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section;
( 2 ) The operator has flared 20,000 Mcf of gas; or
( 3 ) Flowback has been routed to the production separator.
( b ) The BLM may extend the period specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, not to exceed an additional 60 days, based on flowback delays caused by well or equipment problems.
( c ) The BLM may increase the limit specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section by up to an additional 30,000 Mcf of gas for exploratory oil wells in remote locations where additional flaring may be needed in advance of construction of pipeline infrastructure.
( d ) During the dewatering and initial evaluation of an exploratory coalbed methane well, the 30-day period specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is extended to 90 days. The BLM may approve up to two extensions of this evaluation period, not to exceed 90 days per each approval.
( e ) The operator must submit its request for an extension under paragraphs (b), (c), or (d) of this section using a Sundry Notice.
§ 3252.11 What environmental requirements must I meet when conducting exploration operations? ( a ) You must conduct your exploration operations in a manner that: ( 1 ) Protects the quality of surface and subsurface waters, air, and other natural resources, including wildlife, soil, vegetation, and natural history;
( 2 ) Protects the quality of cultural, scenic, and recreational resources;
( 3 ) Accommodates other land uses, as BLM deems necessary; and
( 4 ) Minimizes noise.
( b ) You must remove or, with our permission, properly store all equipment and materials not in use.
( c ) You must provide and use pits, tanks, and sumps of adequate capacity. They must be designed to retain all materials and fluids resulting from drilling temperature gradient wells or other operations, unless we have specified otherwise in writing. When they are no longer needed, you must properly abandon pits and sumps in accordance with your exploration permit.
( d ) BLM may require you to submit a contingency plan describing procedures to protect public health, safety, property, and the environment.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4702 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4702

 To impose limits on excepting competitive service positions from the 
              competitive service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2022

Mr. Kaine (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
Warner, and Mr. Padilla) introduced the following bill; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To impose limits on excepting competitive service positions from the 
              competitive service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing a Patronage System Act of 
2022'' or the ``PPSA Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON EXCEPTION OF COMPETITIVE SERVICE POSITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 3302 of title 5, United 
States Code, no position in the competitive service (as defined in 
section 2102 of that title) may be excepted from the competitive 
service unless that position is placed--
            (1) in any of schedules A through E, as described in 
        section 6.2 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, as in 
        effect on September 30, 2020; and
            (2) under the terms and conditions under part 6 of title 5, 
        Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on September 30, 
        2020.
    (b) Subsequent Transfers.--Notwithstanding section 3302 of title 5, 
United States Code, no position in the excepted service (as defined in 
section 2103 of that title) may be placed in any schedule other than a 
schedule described in subsection (a)(1).
                                 <all>
```
#### Swain *v.*The State.

October 11, 1910.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Martin. Montgomery superior court. 'April 8, 1910.

IF. *B. Kent*and *John R. Cooper,*for plaintiff in error.

*John C. Hart, attorney-general,*and *E. D. Graham, solicitor-general,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

1. Considered in connection with all of the testimony of .the sheriff, who gave evidence of a confession made by the accused to him, it was not error to admit the confession.

2. The charge complained of in the second amended ground of the motion for new trial was not subject to the .criticism that it was not authorized by the evidence, or that it excluded from the consideration of the jury the doctrine of self-defense, or that of reasonable fears.

3. The charge of the court excepted to in the “third and fourth amended grounds of the motion for new trial, relative to the right of a father to take the life of one discovered by him in the act of debauching his minor daughter, where the killing was necessary to prevent the offense, was in accord with the ruling made in the ease of *Gossett*v. *State,*123 *Ga.*431 (51 S. E. 394).

4. There was evidence sufficient to authorize the instruction on the subject of incriminating statements of the accused.

5. The provisions of the Penal Code, § 75, were not applicable to any ■ theory of defense developed by the evidence or the statement of the accused.

6. Under the evidence and the statement of the accused, the law of involuntary manslaughter was not involved.

7. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for new trial.

*'Judyment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
[GRAPHIC OMITTED] AHOLD

                                                                   PRESS RELEASE



AHOLD ANNOUNCES WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL AGAINST ORDER APPROVING AHOLD'S UNITED
STATES SECURITIES CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT



Amsterdam, the Netherlands, July 28, 2006 - Ahold today announced that Drs.
W.C.M. Oud has voluntarily withdrawn with prejudice his appeal, as announced by
Ahold on July 21, 2006, against the final order and judgment approving Ahold's
agreement with the lead plaintiffs to settle the securities class action
entitled "In re Royal Ahold N.V. Securities & ERISA Litigation." The final order
and judgment approving the settlement are no longer subject to appeal.



Ahold Press Office: +31(0)20 509 5343










ALBERT ALBERT HEIJN ALBERT.NL C1000 ETOS FEIRA NOVA GALL & GALL GIANT FOOD
GIANT FOOD STORES HYPERNOVA ICA NORTH STAR FOODSERVICE PEAPOD PINGO DOCE
STOP & SHOP TOPS U.S. FOODSERVICE / WE MAKE IT EASY TO CHOOSE THE BEST


2006022                                                            www.ahold.com
§ 35.10 Default upon failure to file an answer. ( a ) If the defendant does not file an answer within the time prescribed in § 35.9(a) of this part, the reviewing official may refer the complaint to the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Hearings Division, Department of the Interior, for assignment to an ALJ.
( b ) Upon the referral of the complaint, the ALJ shall promptly serve on defendant in the manner prescribed in § 35.8 of this part, a notice that an initial decision will be issued under this section.
( c ) The ALJ shall assume the facts alleged in the complaint to be true and, if such facts establish liability under § 35.3 of this part, the ALJ shall issue an initial decision imposing the maximum amount of penalties and assessments allowed under the statute.
( d ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, by failing to file a timely answer the defendant waives any right to further review of the penalties and assessments imposed under paragraph (c) of this section, and the initial decision shall become final and binding upon the parties 30 days after it is issued.
( e ) If, before such an initial decision becomes final, the defendant files a motion with the ALJ seeking to reopen on the grounds that extraordinary circumstances prevented the defendant from filing an answer, the initial decision shall be stayed pending the ALJ's decision on the motion.
( f ) If, on such motion, the defendant can demonstrate extraordinary circumstances excusing the failure to file a timely answer, the ALJ shall withdraw the initial decision in paragraph (c) of this section, if such a decision has been issued, and shall grant the defendant an opportunity to answer the complaint.
( g ) A decision of the ALJ denying a defendant's motion under paragraph (e) of this section is not subject to reconsideration under § 35.38 of this part.
( h ) The defendant may appeal the decision denying a motion to reopen by filing a notice of appeal with the Director within 15 days after the ALJ denies the motion. The timely filing of a notice of appeal shall stay the initial decision until the appeal is decided.
( i ) If the defendant files a timely notice of appeal with the Director, the ALJ shall forward the record of the proceeding to the Director.
( j ) The Director shall decide expeditiously whether extraordinary circumstances excuse the defendant's failure to file a timely answer based solely on the record before the ALJ.
( k ) If the Director decides that extraordinary circumstances excused the defendant's failure to file a timely answer, the Director shall remand the case to the ALJ with instructions to grant the defendant an opportunity to answer.
( l ) If the Director decides that the defendant's failure to file a timely answer is not excused, the Director shall reinstate the initial decision of the ALJ, which shall become final and binding upon the parties 30 days after the Director issues such decision.
#### Federal Motorship Corporation, Respondent, v. Johnson & Higgins, Respondent-Appellant. United States of Mexico, Appearing Specially, Appellant.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [192 Misc. 401.] [See *post,*p. 708.]
### **Subchapter C—Tax on Employers**

Sec.
3221.
Rate of tax.