39–010 

Calendar No. 35 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! SENATE 1st Session 109–23 

REDWOOD NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT 

ACT OF 2005 

MARCH 9, 2005.—Ordered to be printed 

Mr. DOMENICI, from the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources, submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany S. 134] 

The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, to which was 

referred the bill (S. 134) to adjust the boundary of Redwood National Park in the State of California, having considered the same, 

reports favorably thereon without amendment and recommends 

that the bill do pass. 

PURPOSE OF THE MEASURE

The purpose of S. 134 is to adjust the boundary of Redwood National Park to include approximately 36,400 acres that have been 

acquired by the California Department of Parks and Recreation. 

BACKGROUND AND NEED

By the 1960s, ninety percent of the redwoods in California had 

been harvested and many citizens across the country were concerned that this magnificent resource would soon be lost forever. 

Amid much controversy, a compromise with the timber industry 

was negotiated, and on October 2, 1968, President Johnson signed 

into law the Act that established Redwood National Park (Public 

Law 90–545; 16 U.S.C. 79b). The new park placed 58,000 acres in 

the care of the National Park Service (NPS) and also included 

lands that would remain under the jurisdiction of the State of California. As logging continued outside the park boundary, sediment 

loads increased dramatically along Redwood Creek. In March 1978, 

in response to the threatened health of the stream-side redwoods 

within the national park, President Carter signed into law the addition of 48,000 acres to Redwood National Park. 

2 

In 1994, the National Park Service and the California Department of Parks and Recreation entered into a cooperative agreement 

to jointly manage and protect the State and park lands within the 

boundary of Redwood National Park. The State of California and 

the National Park Service retain separate ownership of their land 

and facilities in the parks; however, both Federal and State lands 

are managed and operated cooperatively. The three California state 

parks and Redwood National Park are now collectively referred to 

as the Redwood National and State Parks (RNSP). These units represent approximately 45 percent of all the old-growth redwood forest remaining in California. The RNSP are designated a World 

Heritage Site and are part of the California Coast Range Biosphere 

Reserve. 

In recent years the California Department of State Parks and 

Recreation has acquired approximately 26,400 acres of additional 

land. S. 134 would amend Public Law 90–545 to expand the boundary of the park and to authorize the California Department of 

Parks and Recreation and the National Park Service to manage the 

additional lands under the terms of the existing cooperative management agreement. 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY

S. 134 was introduced by Senator Feinstein on January 22, 2005. 

During the 108th Congress, the Committee considered identical 

legislation, S. 2567. S. 2567 was introduced by Senator Feinstein 

on June 23, 2004. The Subcommittee on National Parks held a 

hearing on S. 2567 on July 15, 2004. At the business meeting on 

September 15, 2004, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources ordered S. 2567 favorably reported (S. Rept. 108–372). S. 

2567 passed the Senate by unanimous consent on October 10, 2004. 

On November 18, 2004, S. 2567 was referred to the House Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation and Public Lands. The 

House of Representatives did not consider the bill prior to the sine 

die adjournment of the 108th Congress. 

The text of S. 2567 was also included in S. Amdt. 4084 to H.R. 

620, which passed the Senate, as amended, on December 7, 2004. 

At a business meeting on February 9, 2005, the Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources ordered S. 134 favorably reported. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, in an open 

business session on February 9, 2005, by a unanimous voice vote 

of a quorum present, recommends that the Senate pass S. 134. 

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS

Section 1 entitles this Act the ‘‘Redwood National Park Boundary 

Adjustment Act of 2005.’’

Section 2 amends section 2(a) of Public Law 90–545 (16 U.S.C. 

79b(a)) by adjusting the park boundary as referenced on the map 

entitled ‘‘Redwood National Park, Revised Boundary, numbered 

167/60502 and dated February 2003’’. The referenced map is to be 

on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate National Park Service offices and also be provided to the appropriate 

officers of Del Norte and Humbolt Counties, California. This secVerDate Aug 04 2004 06:38 Mar 12, 2005 Jkt 039010 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR023.XXX SR023
3 

tion further amends Public Law 90–545 by increasing the maximum number of acres within the boundary of Redwood National 

Park from 106,000 acres to 133,000 acres. 

COST AND BUDGETARY CONSIDERATIONS

The following estimate of the cost of this measure has been provided by the Congressional Budget Office. 

FEBRUARY 11, 2005. 

Hon. PETE V. DOMENICI, 

Chairman, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, 

U.S. Senate, Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for S. 134, the Redwood National 

Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 2005. 

If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased 

to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Deborah Reis. 

Sincerely, 

DOUGLAS HOLTZ-EAKIN, 

Director. 

Enclosure. 

S. 134—Redwood National Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 2005 

S. 134 would expand the boundary of the Redwood National Park 

in California to include an additional 27,000 acres. CBO estimates 

that enacting this legislation would have no significant impact on 

the federal budget and would not affect revenues or direct spending. The added lands, including the 25,500-acre Mill Creek property, are already owned by California. Like another state park 

property within the existing boundary of the Redwood National 

Park, these lands would continue to be owned by the state and 

would be managed cooperatively by the state and the National 

Park Service. 

S. 134 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates 

as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments. 

The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Deborah Reis. This estimate was approved by Peter H. Fontaine, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis. 

REGULATORY IMPACT EVALUATION

In compliance with paragraph 11(b) of rule XXVI of the Standing 

Rules of the Senate, the Committee makes the following evaluation 

of the regulatory impact which would be incurred in carrying out 

S. 134. 

The bill is not a regulatory measure in the sense of imposing 

Government-established standards or significant economic responsibilities on private individuals and businesses. 

No personal information would be collected in administering the 

program. Therefore, there would be no impact on personal privacy. 

Little, if any, additional paperwork would result from the enactment of S. 134. 

4 

EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS

The testimony provided by the Department of the Interior at the 

Subcommittee hearing on S. 2567 in the 108th Congress follows: 

STATEMENT OF A. DURAND JONES, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, 

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Mr. Chairman, thank you for the opportunity to appear 

before your committee to present the views of the Department of the Interior on S. 2567, a bill to adjust the boundary of Redwood National Park in the State of California. 

The Department supports enactment of S. 2567. This 

legislation would enable the National Park Service and the 

California Department of Parks and Recreation to manage 

a large swath of state-owned redwood forest land, known 

as the Mill Creek property, under the same terms that 

state park lands currently within the boundary of Redwood 

National Park are managed. It would thus provide for 

more efficient and cost-effective management and protection of a very ecologically important resource in the coastal 

redwood region of northern California. There would be no 

Federal costs for land acquisition or development resulting 

from this legislation, and only negligible operation and 

maintenance costs. 

S. 2567 would revise the boundary of Redwood National 

Park and increase the park’s acreage limitation from 

106,000 acres to 133,000 acres to accommodate the addition of the 25,500-acre Mill Creek property and about 900 

acres of state park lands that have been acquired since the 

last park boundary adjustment was enacted in 1978. The 

Mill Creek property consists of the watersheds of Mill 

Creek and Rock Creek, tributaries to the Smith River, and 

is contiguous to the Redwood National Park boundary. 

This property has been studied and proposed for park status since the early 1900’s, most recently in the 1960’s as 

the heart of an early proposal to establish Redwood National Park. Coast redwoods comprise almost 95 percent of 

the forest type on the property. The land includes about 

121 acres of ancient redwood forest, and contains 23 species that are endangered, threatened, or of special concern. 

Mill Creek supports the most significant run of Coho salmon in the entire Smith River watershed and has been identified as critical to the recovery of the species. 

The Mill Creek property was purchased by the Save-theRedwoods League for $60 million from the Stimson Lumber Company, which was phasing out logging operations 

on the property and wanted to sell the land. Funding for 

the purchase came from a variety of state and private 

sources. The land became part of the California state park 

system in June, 2002, and is being managed under an interim plan pending action by Congress to add the property 

to Redwood National Park. 

If the Mill Creek property is included within the boundary of Redwood National Park, it will be managed under 

the same cooperative management agreement that the NaVerDate Aug 04 2004 00:34 Mar 12, 2005 Jkt 039010 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6969 E:\HR\OC\SR023.XXX SR023
5 

tional Park Service and the California Department of 

Parks and Recreation currently use to manage the National Park Service property and the three state parks 

within the boundary. The joint Federal-state management 

arrangement at Redwood is unusual within the National 

Park System, but has come to serve as a model of interagency cooperative management efforts. 

The Federal-state management arrangement at Redwood 

stems from the origins of the park. The 1968 legislation 

that established Redwood National Park and the 1978 legislation that expanded it included three existing state 

parks within the boundary in anticipation of eventual conveyance from the state to the National Park Service. For 

a variety of reasons, that conveyance did not occur. The 

state parks currently own about 32 percent of the land 

within the Redwood National Park boundary, and about 

half the acreage of the ancient redwood forest in the park. 

In the 1990’s, after years of experiencing duplication of efforts and management conflicts, the National Park Service 

and the California Department of Parks and Recreation established a framework for cooperative management of the 

Federal and state parks. Congress facilitated this effort by 

providing authority for the National Park Service to enter 

into a cooperative management agreement for the Redwood parks with the state agency—and, incidentally, has 

since extended that authority to all units of the National 

Park System due in large part to the success of the arrangement at Redwood. 

The Federal-state cooperative management agreement at 

Redwood National Park allows the two park agencies to 

operate the entire 105,000-acre area in a unified manner. 

In a reflection of that unity, while ‘Redwood National Park’ remains the legal name for the park, the name of the site 

that is used for public information purposes is ‘Redwood 

National and State Parks.’ The management decisions of 

both agencies are guided by a joint General Management 

Plan, adopted in 2000. The two agencies share staff, equipment, and facilities to fulfill common resource protection 

and visitor service goals. They develop common procedures 

for activities such as issuing special use permits, and common programs for park operations such as staff training 

and media relations. They develop and implement schedules so that the two agencies cover for each other and 

avoid duplication. Both agencies benefit from efficiencies in 

the areas of law enforcement, interpretation, administration, resource management and maintenance. Facilities 

and space on the new parcel will increase these efficiencies 

by providing centralized staging areas, storage space and 

offices for these joint operations. 

Adding the Mill Creek property to the boundary of Redwood National Park, as S. 2567 would do, would enable 

the National Park Service and the California Department 

of Parks and Recreation to extend all the benefits of the 

cooperative management agreement to that property, as 

well. The result would be the more efficient and effective 

6 

management and protection of land that provides a critically important contribution to the ecological values that 

the National Park Service protects at Redwood National 

Park. 

Mr. Chairman, that concludes my statement. I would be 

happy to answer any questions you or other members of 

the subcommittee may have. 

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW

In compliance with paragraph 12 of rule XXVI of the Standing 

Rules of the Senate, changes in existing law made by S. 134, as ordered reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be 

omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in 

italic, existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in 

roman): 

Public Law 90–545 

AN ACT To establish a Redwood National Park in the State of California, and for 

other purposes 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in order to 

preserve significant examples of the primeval coastal redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) forests and the streams and seashores with 

which they are associated for purposes of public inspiration, enjoyment, and scientific study, there is hereby established a Redwood 

National Park in Del Norte and Humboldt Counties, California. 

SEC. 2. ø(a) The area to be included, within the Redwood National Park is that generally depicted on the maps entitled ‘‘Redwood National Park,’’ numbered NPS–RED–7114–A and NPS–

RED–7114–B, and dated September 1968, copies of which maps 

shall be kept available for public inspection in the offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, and shall be filed 

with appropriate officers of Del Norte and Humboldt Counties.¿ 

(a)(1) The Redwood National Park consists of the land generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Redwood National Park, Revised Boundary’, numbered 167/60502, and dated February 2003. 

(2) The map referred to in paragraph (1) shall be—

(A) on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service; and 

(B) provided by the Secretary of the Interior to the appropriate officers of Del Norte and Humboldt Counties, California.’’

øThe Secretary¿ (3) The Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) may from time to time, with a view 

to carrying out the purpose of this Act and with particular attention to minimizing siltation of the streams, damage to the timber, 

and assuring the preservation of the scenery within the boundaries 

of the national park as depicted on said maps, modify said boundaries, giving notice of any changes involved therein by publication 

of a revised drawing or boundary description in the Federal Register and by filing said revision with the officers with whom the 

original maps were filed, but the acreage within said park shall at 

no time exceed øone hundred and six thousand acres¿ 133,000 

7 

acres, exclusive of submerged lands and publicly owned highways 

and roads. 

* * * * * * * 

Æ