alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7822-8]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed settlement.

# SUMMARY:

                        The United States Environmental Protection Agency is proposing to enter into an Agreement that will settle a section 106(b) Petition that Hercules filed in 1997 pursuant to section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1) concerning the Valley Chemical Superfund Site in Greenville, Washington County, Mississippi. In the Agreement, Hercules agrees to drop its section 106(b) Petition in exchange for addressing past costs at three other sites in Region 4. The sites are the Terry Creek Dredge Spoil Area/Hercules Outfall Superfund Site located in Brunswick, Glynn County, Georgia; the Hercules 009 Landfill Superfund Site located in Brunswick, Glynn County, Georgia; and the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Company Superfund Site located in Albany, Dougherty County, Georgia. EPA will consider public comments on the proposed settlement until November 1, 2004. EPA may withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement should such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper or inadequate. Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. EPA, Region 4, (WMD-SEIMB), 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887,                         *Batchelor.Paula@EPA.GOV.*

Written comments may be submitted to Ms. Batchelor within 30 calendar days of the date of this publication.

Dated: September 20, 2004.

Rosalind Brown,

Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division.

[FR Doc. 04-22086 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: ADOPTION OF V.I.M.B.

PETITION OF: N.B., JR., FATHER :

:

:

:

: No. 627 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF N.H.M.B.

PETITION OF: N.B., JR., FATHER :

:

:

:

: No. 628 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF J.T.C.B.

PETITION OF: N.B., JR., FATHER :

:

:

:

: No. 629 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of November, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

Report of Independent Accountants


JPMorgan Chase Bank, Servicer
and
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., Transferor,
and
The Bank of New York, Trustee

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Servicing of Securitized Credit Card Receivables
that JPMorgan Chase Bank maintained effective internal control over servicing of
securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2001, based upon the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over such functions. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over servicing of the securitized
credit card receivables, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that JPMorgan Chase Bank maintained
effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit card receivables
as of December 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based upon
the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
March 25, 2002
Step 1 Agglomorator Stack Test History

MinnRule 7011.0730 Measured MinnRule 7011.0735

S.V. Stack Test

MPCA 

Approval Pellet TSP PM-10 CO VOC NOx NOx SO2 THC Fluoride Fuel Feed Prdctn PM PM 10 Emission Rate Limit Gas Flow Concentration Concentration Allowance

No. Date Date Type lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/mmbtu lbs/hr ppmc w lbs/hr Type PH gas Tot MBTUH Rate Rate lbs/ton lbs/ton (lbs/hr TSP) Rate (DSCFM) (GR/DSCF) (GR/DSCF)

103 L3 WG 17-May-05 27-Feb-06 ACID 1620 273 13 1.3 127.5 21 ng/wood 40.50 126.40 281.2 250.3 6.47 1.09

103 L3 WG 17-Nov-05 29-Mar-06 FLUX 4.63 262 199 250,000

103 L3 WG 26-Dec-06 FLUX 78 gas

3-Nov-09 FLUX 16.6 4.4 0.43 gas
Step 1 Agglomorator Stack Test History

Date of most recent review 23-May-03

PM/PM-10

S.V. Stack Test Approval Pellet Filt Filt + Org Inorg Total Filt Filt + Org Inorg Total Fuel Feed Prod Water Pressure

No. Date Date Type lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr gr/dscf gr/dscf gr/dscf gr/dscf Type PH gas Tot MBTUH Rate Rate Flow drop

103 L3 WG 17-May-05 ACID 1580 1580 40 1620 0.76 0.76 0.02 0.78 ng/wood 40.50 126.40 281.2 250.3

103 L3 WG 27-Sep-06 FLUX 39 40 12 52 0.022 0.022 0.007 0.029 ng/wood 182.00 313 246 2313 4.3

9-Oct-07 FLUX 33 0.02 ng/wood

20-Oct-07 FLUX 15 0.0075 gas

30-Oct-07 FLUX 37 0.019 ng/wood

4-Mar-08 28 29 23 52 0.0149 0.0152 0.012 0.0272 ng/wood 140.00 197.00 301 237
Includes Filt + Org

MinnRule 7011.0730 Measured MinnRule 7011.0735

Emission Rate Limit Gas Flow Concentration Concentration Allowance

(lbs/hr TSP) Rate (DSCFM) (GR/DSCF) (GR/DSCF)

244,000

42.00 221,000 0.033
### §500. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 897, §1, 50 Stat. 900, which declared purpose of this subchapter for establishment of a reindeer industry, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 897, 50 Stat. 900, which enacted this subchapter, was popularly known as the "Reindeer Industry Act of 1937".

#### Repeals

Act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 897, §17, 50 Stat. 902, which repealed provisions inconsistent with this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### Authorization of Appropriations

Act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 897, §16, 50 Stat. 902, which authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 to carry out this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Derek Stanton LAMAR, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 05-7372.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 8, 2006.

Decided March 8, 2006.

Derek Stanton LaMar, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

*814Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Derek Stanton LaMar, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that LaMar has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Space research[electronic resource]**
 
SuDoc:NAS 1.92:
ItemNumber: 0830-C-09 (online)
CGPsystem Number:00577037
 
Vol. 1 No. 1
Vol. 1 No. 2
Vol. 1 No. 3
Vol. 1 No. 4
 
Vol. 2 No. 1
Vol. 2 No. 2
Vol. 2 No. 3
Vol. 2 No. 4
 
Vol. 3 No. 1
Vol. 3 No. 2
Vol. 3 No. 3
### Subpart C—Definitions and Special Rules

Sec.
150.
Definitions and special rules.
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                         For the month of November 2003

                         Commission File Number: 0-30852

                          GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.

                          Galicia Financial Group S.A.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                          Tte. Gral. Juan D. Peron 456
                         (1038) Buenos Aires, Argentina
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.


                                Form 20-F X   Form 40-F
                                          ---           ---

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                    Yes      No  X
                                        ---     ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
                                   -------
<PAGE>
                                  FORM 6-K

                           Commission File No. 0-30852

 Month Filed                    Event and Summary               Exhibit No.

 November 2003   Press release, dated November 25, 2003,             99.1
                 announcing Banco de Galicia y Buenos Aires S.A.'s
                 agreement in principle with the Ad Hoc Creditors'
                 Steering Committee.

<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                    GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.
                                    (Registrant)



   Date:  November 26, 2003         By:/s/ Antonio Garces
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Antonio Garces
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Nicole S. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes
of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: | September 19, 2006
|----- | ------------------



/S/ LISA GOPALAKRISHNANLisa GopalakrishnanChief Financial Officer
EX-10.19





 Exhibit 10.19 

 
  
 



 
 Ralph Baxter 
 37 Hamilton
Avenue 
 Wheeling, WV 26003 
 April 29, 2019 

RE: Third Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated March 1, 2016 

Dear Mr. Baxter: 
 This Third Amendment
(the “Third Amendment”) amends the previously signed Consulting Agreement by and between Integration Appliance, Inc. (“Company”) and Ralph Baxter (“Consultant”) dated March 1, 2016, and amended on April 28, 2017,
and on January 1, 2019 (as amended, the “Agreement”). 
 The parties acknowledge and agree that effective May 1, 2019,
Ralph Baxter hereby assigns all of his rights, title, interest, and delegates all of his obligations, responsibilities and duties, in and to the Agreement, to Ralph Baxter, Inc. Ralph Baxter, Inc accepts all of Ralph Baxter’s obligations,
responsibilities, and duties under the Agreement. In accordance with Section 9 of the Agreement, Company consents to the assignment described herein. Therefore, all references in the Agreement to “Ralph Baxter” shall be replaced with
“Ralph Baxter, Inc.”. 
 Unless otherwise specified, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the
Agreement. This Third Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. A facsimile or .pdf signature shall be considered valid as if
an original signature. 
 Except as specifically amended by this Third Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. To the
extent that there is any conflict between the provisions of this Third Amendment and the Agreement, the provisions of this Third Amendment shall prevail. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through the signatures below of their duly authorized officers, have executed this Third Amendment as of the dates set forth
below. 
  

									
	RALPH BAXTER, INC.	 		 	INTEGRATION APPLIANCE, INC.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Ralph Baxter
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen I. Robertson

	Name:	 	 Ralph Baxter
	 		 	Name:	 	 Stephen I. Robertson

	Title:	 	 Board Member, Intapp
	 		 	Title:	 	 CFO

	Date:	 	 4/29/19
	 		 	Date:	 	 4/30/19



  
 Page 1 of 2 













 



 
  

			
	RALPH BAXTER
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Ralph Baxter

	Name:	 	 Ralph Baxter

	Title:	 	 Board Member, Intapp

	Date:	 	 4/29/19



  
 Page 2 of 2
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOn High-Order Upwind Methods for AdvectionScheme III (piecewise linear) and V (piecewise parabolic) of Van Leer are shown to yield identical solutions provided the initial conditions are chosen in an appropriate manner. This result is counter intuitive since it is generally believed that piecewise linear and piecewise parabolic methods cannot produce the same solutions due to their different degrees of approximation. The result also shows a key connection between the approaches of discontinuous and continuous representations.Document ID20170008462Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHuynh, Hung T.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2017Publication DateAugust 1, 2017Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN44177AIAA Paper 2017-3093NASA/TM-2017-219535E-19393Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics ConferenceLocation: Denver, COCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 5, 2017End Date: June 9, 2017Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Keywordshigh-order methodsconvention equationupwind schemesAvailable DownloadsNameType20170008462.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20170008107See AlsoOn High-Order Upwind Methods for Advection20170006852See AlsoOn High-Order Upwind Methods for Advectionvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §8753. Expedited consideration of requests for authorization of certain human rights-, humanitarian-, and democracy-related activities with respect to Iran

#### (a) Requirement

The Office of Foreign Assets Control, in consultation with the Department of State, shall establish an expedited process for the consideration of complete requests for authorization to engage in human rights-, humanitarian-, or democracy-related activities relating to Iran that are submitted by—

(1) entities receiving funds from the Department of State to engage in the proposed activity;

(2) the Broadcasting Board of Governors; and

(3) other appropriate agencies of the United States Government.

#### (b) Procedures

Requests for authorization under subsection (a) shall be submitted to the Office of Foreign Assets Control in conformance with the Office's regulations, including section 501.801 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations (commonly known as the Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations). Applicants shall fully disclose the parties to the transactions as well as describe the activities to be undertaken. License applications involving the exportation or reexportation of goods, technology, or software to Iran shall include a copy of an official Commodity Classification issued by the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, as part of the license application.

#### (c) Foreign policy review

The Department of State shall complete a foreign policy review of a request for authorization under subsection (a) not later than 30 days after the request is referred to the Department by the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

#### (d) License determinations

License determinations for complete requests for authorization under subsection (a) shall be made not later than 90 days after receipt by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, with the following exceptions:

(1) Any requests involving the exportation or reexportation to Iran of goods, technology, or software listed on the Commerce Control List maintained pursuant to part 774 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, shall be processed in a manner consistent with the Iran-Iraq Arms Non-Proliferation Act of 1992 (title XVI of Public Law 102–484) and other applicable provisions of law.

(2) Any other requests presenting unusual or extraordinary circumstances.

#### (e) Regulations

The Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe such regulations as are appropriate to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 112–158, title IV, §413, Aug. 10, 2012, 126 Stat. 1256.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Iran-Iraq Arms Non-Proliferation Act of 1992, referred to in subsec. (d)(1), is title XVI of div. A of Pub. L. 102–484, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2571, which is set out as a note under section 1701 of Title 50, War and National Defense.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Broadcasting Board of Governors renamed United States Agency for Global Media pursuant to section 6204(a)(21) of this title. The renaming was effectuated by notice to congressional appropriations committees dated May 24, 2018, and became effective Aug. 22, 2018.
#### § 3273.10 When do I need a site license for a utilization facility?

You must obtain a site license approved by BLM, unless your facility will be located on lands leased as described in § 3273.11. Do not start building or testing your utilization facility on public lands leased for geothermal resources until BLM has approved both your facility construction permit (see § 3272.14) and your site license. The facility operator must apply for the license.