alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          15,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (643)
<INVENTORY>                                     69,108
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,668
<PP&E>                                          42,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,552)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,763
<BONDS>                                         62,614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           102
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,979
<SALES>                                        198,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,597
<CGS>                                          162,315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  162,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,870
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,405
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,405
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
January 8 , 2013



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE ESTATE OF DEBORAH L. ADAMS , DECEASED

NO. 14

- 12

- 00064

- CV

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Ka mi Haack

, signed January 6, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance w ith th e court’ s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee, Kami Haack.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
### Mica deposits of the southeastern Piedmont, Part 7, Hartwell district, Georgia and South Carolina; Part 8, Outlying deposits in South Carolina

By: W. R. GriffittsJ. C. Olson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp248E

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 25**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 26**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 1513

_____________________________ S AMUEL P ARAMORE ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

— Original Jurisdiction

.

August 8, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

L EWIS , R OWE , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Samuel Paramore, pro se
, Petitioner

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-21826-CIV-WILLIAMS

ALISON CASE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC. et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Torres’ Report & 

Recommendation. (DE 32). The Report recommends that Defendant Celebrity Cruise 

Inc.’s motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff filed objections to 

the Report. (DE 33). After a careful review of the Report, the record, and applicable case 

law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. The Report (DE 32) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (DE 18) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN 

PART. 

3. Defendant’s motion to dismiss Count I is GRANTED with leave to amend. 

4. Defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts III and V is DENIED. 

5. Defendant’s motion to strike damages preempted by DOHSA and punitive 

damages against it is GRANTED with prejudice.

6. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint as set forth in the Report within fourteen 

days of this Order. 

Case 1:20-cv-21826-KMW Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2021 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 14th day of January,

2020.

Case 1:20-cv-21826-KMW Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2021 Page 2 of 2
### §2815. State, tribal, and local law enforcement cooperation

The Attorney General may provide technical and other assistance to State, tribal, and local governments that enter into cooperative agreements, including agreements relating to mutual aid, hot pursuit of suspects, and cross-deputization for the purposes of—

(1) improving law enforcement effectiveness;

(2) reducing crime in Indian country and nearby communities; and

(3) developing successful cooperative relationships that effectively combat crime in Indian country and nearby communities.

(Pub. L. 111–211, title II, §222, July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2272.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010, and not as part of the Indian Law Enforcement Reform Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of terms used in this section, see section 203(a) of Pub. L. 111–211, set out as a note under section 2801 of this title.
#### § 3471.3 Cancellation or forfeiture.
##### 



Exhibit 12 MERISTAR HOSPITALITY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios 2003
        
        2002
        
        2001
        
        2000
        
        1999Income from continuing
            operations before minority interests and income tax expense (1)
        
        $
        (272,457
        )
        
        $
        (78,413
        )
        
        $
        (19,417
        )
        
        $
        86,036
        
        
        $
        79,394Fixed charges:Interest expense
        
        
        141,443
        
        
        
        136,880
        
        
        
        122,655
        
        
        
        118,221
        
        
        
        100,922Interest capitalized
        
        
        3,062
        
        
        
        3,993
        
        
        
        6,098
        
        
        
        8,613
        
        
        
        12,540Amortization of debt
            expense
        
        
        5,020
        
        
        
        6,808
        
        
        
        4,030
        
        
        
        3,326
        
        
        
        2,729Preferred distributions
        
        
        556
        
        
        
        554
        
        
        
        554
        
        
        
        554
        
        
        
        574Total fixed charges
        
        
        150,081
        
        
        
        148,235
        
        
        
        133,337
        
        
        
        130,714
        
        
        
        116,765Income from continuing
            operations before minority interest, income tax expense and fixed
            charges (excluding capitalized interest and preferred distributions)
        
        
        (125,994
        )
        
        
        65,275
        
        
        
        107,268
        
        
        
        207,583
        
        
        
        183,045Divided by fixed
            charges
        
        
        150,081
        
        
        
        148,235
        
        
        
        133,337
        
        
        
        130,714
        
        
        
        116,765Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
        
        
        (0.84
        )
        
        
        0.44
        
        
        
        0.80
        
        
        
        1.59
        
        
        
        1.57Deficiency
        
        
        (276,075
        )
        
        
        (82,960
        )
        
        
        (26,069
        )
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
   (1)
    
    This amount is before minority interests since the minority interests relate to majority-owned subsidiaries that have fixed charges.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2015 - 0927 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM172AD

MCF - SBU - 35 - 001 --- 1 0/25/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO CASARES-CUEVAS, AKA 

Roberto Mendoza, AKA Fernando, AKA 

Tony,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 23-3673

D.C. No.

3:12-cr-00038-LRH-VPC-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 29, 2024**

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Casares-Cuevas appeals pro se from the district court’s order 

denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-3673

Casares-Cuevas argues that, contrary to the district court’s conclusion, he 

exhausted his administrative remedies before filing the instant motion. We need 

not decide this issue because, even if Casares-Cuevas had exhausted, the district 

court did not abuse its discretion by denying relief. See United States v. Keller, 2 

F.4th 1278, 1281-82 (9th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review and holding that 

exhaustion is not jurisdictional). 

First, as the district court explained, the law concerning methamphetamine 

offenses has not changed since Casares-Cuevas’s sentencing, and he failed to show 

that his sentence is unfairly disparate to sentences received by similarly situated 

defendants. Second, the district court reasonably found—and Casares-Cuevas does 

not challenge— that release was unwarranted in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

factors, including the seriousness of Casares-Cuevas’s offense and the safety of the 

community. See United States v. Wright, 46 F.4th 938, 947-48 (9th Cir. 2022)

(district court may deny compassionate release under the § 3553(a) factors alone). 

We do not consider Casares-Cuevas’s argument regarding his eligibility for

safety-valve relief because it was not raised before the district court. See Padgett 

v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). 

The government’s motion to strike the reply brief is denied.

AFFIRMED.
### Subpart B—Foreign Corporations

Sec.
881.
Tax on income of foreign corporations not connected with United States business.
882.
Tax on income of foreign corporations connected with United States business.
883.
Exclusions from gross income.
884.
Branch profits tax.
885.
Cross references.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XII, §1241(d), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2580, added item 884 and redesignated former item 884 as 885.

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–809, title I, §104(b)(3), Nov. 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 1557, substituted "Tax on income of foreign corporations not connected with United States business" for "Tax on foreign corporations not engaged in business in United States" in item 881, and "Tax on income of foreign corporations connected with United States business" for "Tax on resident foreign corporations" in item 882.
|   | (1)    |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|   | (2)    |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                Date: March 31, 2009 |   | /s/ Willem M. Smit                                                                                                 |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                        |   | Willem      M. SmitChief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer of Playlogic Entertainment, Inc.) |   |   |
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Thomas D. Malkoski, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Penford Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.    PENFORD CORPORATION   Date: January 7, 2005 /s/ Thomas D. Malkoski   Thomas D. Malkoski *Chief Executive Officer*
### §1118. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–659, §8, Oct. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 910, which related to distribution of shares of deceased enrollees and minors or persons under legal disability, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 2711.1 Initiation of sale.
### §782. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 1, 1955, ch. 444, §3, 69 Stat. 432, which related to payments to heirs or legatees, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4755 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4755

 To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to ensure 
 that ranchers who have grazing agreements on national grasslands are 
         treated the same as permittees on other Federal land.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2022

   Mr. Thune introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to ensure 
 that ranchers who have grazing agreements on national grasslands are 
         treated the same as permittees on other Federal land.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF NATIONAL GRASSLANDS FOR GRAZING LEASES AND 
              PERMITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 402(a) of the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1752(a)) is amended by striking 
``lands within National Forests'' and inserting ``National Forest 
System (as defined in section 11(a) of the Forest and Rangeland 
Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1609(a))) land''.
    (b) Effect.--Nothing in the amendment made by subsection (a) 
modifies or affects--
            (1) the applicability to national grasslands of any 
        provision of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 
        (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) other than section 402 of that Act (43 
        U.S.C. 1752);
            (2) title III of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act (7 
        U.S.C. 1010 et seq.); or
            (3) section 11 of the Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 
        1978 (43 U.S.C. 1907).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 59135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-04-122]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Merrimack River, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a 
temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations for the 
Newburyport US1 Bridge, mile 3.4, across the Merrimack River, 
Massachusetts. This deviation allows the bridge to remain in the closed 
position from 6 a.m. on October 18, 2004 through 6 p.m. on October 22, 
2004. This temporary deviation is necessary to facilitate structural 
repairs at the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective from October 18, 2004 through 
October 22, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John McDonald, Project Officer, First 
Coast Guard District, at (617) 223-8364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Newburyport US1 Bridge, at mile 3.4, 
across the Merrimack River, has a vertical clearance of 35 feet at mean 
high water and 44 feet at mean low water in the closed position. The 
existing regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.605(a).
    The bridge owner, Massachusetts Highway Department, requested a 
temporary deviation from the drawbridge operating regulations to 
facilitate necessary structural repairs, the replacement of the locking 
pin motor and the brake unit, at the bridge.
    This deviation to the operating regulations allows the bridge to 
remain in the closed position from 6 a.m. on October 18, 2004 through 6 
p.m. on October 22, 2004.
    This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 
33 CFR 117.35 and will be performed with all due speed in order to 
return the bridge to normal operation as soon as possible.

    Dated: September 17, 2004.
David P. Pekoske,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 04-22274 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
### §610a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–534, §2, Sept. 28, 1968, 82 Stat. 884, which authorized the sale or exchange of lands owned by or in trust for the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community and required that the land values involved in an exchange be equal or be equalized by the payment of money, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.