alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of high pressure nitrogen on the thermal stability of SiC fibersPolymer-derived SiC fibers were exposed to nitrogen gas pressures of 7 and 50 atm at temperatures up to 1800 C. The fiber weight loss, chemical composition, and tensile strength were then measured at room temperature in order to understand the effects of nitrogen exposure on fiber stability. High pressure nitrogen treatments limited weight loss to 3 percent or less for temperatures up to 1800 C. The bulk Si-C-O chemical composition of the fiber remained relatively constant up to 1800 C with only a slight increase in nitrogen content after treatment at 50 atm; however, fiber strength retention was significantly improved. To further understand the effects of the nitrogen atmosphere on the fiber stability, the results of previous high pressure argon treatments were compared to those of the high pressure nitrogen treatments. High pressure inert gas can temporarily maintain fiber strength by physically inhibiting the evolution of gaseous species which result from internal reactions. In addition to this physical effect, it would appear that high pressure nitrogen further improved fiber temperature capability by chemically reacting with the fiber surface, thereby reducing the rate of gas evolution. Subsequent low pressure argon treatments following the initial nitrogen treatments resulted in stronger fibers than after argon treatment alone, further supporting the chemical reaction mechanism and its beneficial effects on fiber strength.Document ID19910006762Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsJaskowiak, Martha H.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-5671NASA-TM-103245NAS 1.15:103245Accession Number91N16075Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 510-01-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006762.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
(July 13, 1943.)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jacob Bernoff, Thomas McAdam, Murray Gabaeff, Edward Taylor, Abraham Lichtenstein, Charles Green, Jeremiah Buckley, George Blume and John Murphy, Appellants, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present-—-Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
§ 3836.22 How do I qualify for a deferment of assessment work on my mining claims that are on National Park System (NPS) lands? Correspondence from NPS merely denying your Plan of Operations for incompleteness or inadequacy will not suffice for a deferment of assessment work. To qualify for a deferment of assessment work on claims situated on NPS lands— ( a ) You must obtain a letter from NPS stating that— ( 1 ) NPS received and found your proposed Plan of Operations to be complete;
( 2 ) NPS cannot act on the plan until it conducts a validity exam; and
( 3 ) NPS anticipates completing the validity exam after the assessment year ends.
( b ) You must send NPS's letter to BLM, along with other documents and information that BLM requires (see § 3836.23) to support your petition for deferment of assessment work.
Other

1898.136
• ANGOON, ALASKA 99820 • 

### October 25, 2012 Michael Martin 

### US Department Transportation Essential Air Service Division 

### Office ofAviation Analysis 120 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, 

### DC 20590 Dear Mr. 

### Martin, 788-3821

··. ,: The City Angoon is aware 

### that our scheduled air service providerAlaska Seaplane Service lLC is expanding fleet adding five seat**float~equipped** Cessna 206. City fully the addition of this aircraftto the Alaska Seaplanes fleet use in scheduled flights Service program. 

### Sincerely, Ric ar Mayor City 

### ofAngoon
SCWC-29794, SCWC-29795, SCWC-29796

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

SCWC-29794

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

NELSON KUUALOHA ARMITAGE, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

(CASE NO. 2P106-02017)

SCWC-29795

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

RUSSELL K. KAHOOKELE, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

(CASE NO. 2P106-02018)

SCWC-29796

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

HENRY MAILE NOA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

(CASE NO. 2P106-01909)

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NOS. 29794, 29795, and 29796; CASE NOS. 2P106-02017,

2P106-02018, and 2P106-01909)

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-29794

24-OCT-2013

01:15 PM
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on

September 16, 2013 by Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants Nelson

Kuualoha Armitage, Russel Kahookele, and Henry Maile Noa is

hereby accepted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that within 10 days from the

date of this order, each of the parties shall file a supplemental

brief not to exceed five pages in length, addressing whether the

Complaint must be dismissed without prejudice under State v.

Apollonio, No. SCWC–11–0000695, 2013 WL 5574921 (October 10,

2013), because it did not allege the state of mind required to

commit the offense of Entrance into the Reserve, Hawai#i

Administrative Rule § 13-261-10.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 24, 2013.

Daniel G. Hempey, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

for petitioners

 /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

 

 /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

 /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

 /s/ Richard W. Pollack

2
# -.

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORT AnON' OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
Application of ) ) Menagerie Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a ) Monarch Air ) ) For authority to conduct scheduled ) Passenger operations as acommuter air ) Carrier under 49 U.S.C. 41738 ) ) DOCKET DOT-OST-2014-0192

MOTION OF MENAGERIE ENTERPRISES D/B/A MONARCH AIR TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Rebecca B. MacPherson Jones Day 51 Louisiana Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: 202-879-3939 Fax: 202-626-1700 Email: rmacpherson@jonesday.com

December 23,2014

Notice: Any person who wishes to support oroppose this application must file an answer by October [7days after receipt by DOT] and serve that answer on all persons served with this filing.
.BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
Application of Menagerie EnterPrises, Inc. d/b/a Monarch Air For authority to conduct scheduled Passenger operations as acommuter air Carrier under 49 U.S.C. 41738 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET DOT-OST-20 14-0192

MOTION OF MENAGERIE ENTERPRISES D/B/A MONARCH AIR TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
Pursuant to section 302.12 ofthe Department's Rules ofPractice, Menagerie Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Monarch Airhereby moves to withhold from public disclosure Exhibits A and B ofthe Response to Information Request forthe above-captioned application for issuance ofcommuter air carrier authority. These documents are being filed with this Motion inasealed envelope marked "Confidential Materials

- Rule 12Treatment Requested." In support ofthis Motion, Menagerie Enterprises, Inc submits the following:
.• Exhibit A consists ofthe binding commitment letter between Rise, LLC and Monarch Air.

• Exhibit B, Letter from Steve Young, Legacy Texas Bank, dated December 18,2014 provides information related tothe financing ofthe aircraft that will beused intheRise operations. the information Menagerie Enterprises, Inc. seeks towithhold from public disclosure is (l) commercial or financial, (2) obtained from aperson outside the government, and (3) privileged orconfidential. Moreover, release ofthis information would cause substantial harm tothe competitive position ofMenagerie Enterprises, Inc. orthe individual from whom the information was obtained and serve no public interest ifreleased. Exhibits Aand B contain sensitive financial and commercial information that could beused by competitors to impede the applicant's plans to undertake the proposed air service. Moreover, the information inthese exhibits ishighly detailed and would not otherwise be made accessible to persons outside the company. As such, the information isentitled tonon-disclosure under

# •

section 552(b) (4) oftitle 5ofthe United States Code.

Therefore, this information should be afforded confidential treatment bythe Department under Rule 12. Submitted by,



# R~:t:1f/;

Counsel for Menagerie Enterprises, Inc. Attachments Exhibits



### 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE  1,
1997 AND  THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF  INCOME  FOR  THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 1, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS  ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-1-1997
<CASH>                                            7,684,066
<SECURITIES>                                      4,172,552
<RECEIVABLES>                                    18,706,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1,050,733
<INVENTORY>                                      12,744,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 46,274,540
<PP&E>                                           79,918,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                   37,944,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  101,298,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            14,155,581
<BONDS>                                           7,883,732
<COMMON>                                          2,706,335
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       73,551,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    101,298,688
<SALES>                                          26,802,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 31,184,025
<CGS>                                            18,029,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    18,029,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     13,699
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  189,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4,807,678
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,682,688
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3,124,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3,124,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .13
        

</TABLE>
#### § 3830.97 What if I pay only part of the service charges for a notice of intent to locate mining claims on SRHA lands?

For notices of intent to locate mining claims (NOITL) under the Stockraising Homestead Act (see part 3838 of this chapter for information regarding the Stockraising Homestead Act and NOITLs), BLM will not accept a NOITL unless we receive your payment of the required service charges. BLM will return the NOITL to you without taking any further action. See § 3830.21 of this part for the amount of the service charge for a NOITL.
### §723. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 23, 1954, ch. 831, §3, 68 Stat. 769, which provided for termination of Federal powers over tribe effective on the date of the proclamation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3452.1 Relinquishment.
— ,r ‘I

(Federally Constructed Programs)

WATER AND AiR POLLUTION CONTROL

The Contractor, in carrying out this contract, shall comply with all applicable

water and air pollution laws and regulations of the United States and the State of

California, and shall obtain all required permits or licenses from the appropriate

Federal, State, or local authorities.

Approved 8/24/76; Reviewed 11/84

include in 9(d), 9c(1), 9(e), 9c(2)

Not applicable in P.L 130, P.L 984, D&MC, R&B

M.32
§ 3252.16 How must I abandon a temperature gradient well? ( a ) Before abandoning your well, submit a complete and signed Sundry Notice, Form 3260-3, describing how you plan to abandon wells and reclaim the surface. Do not begin abandoning wells or reclaiming the surface until BLM approves your Sundry Notice.
( b ) You must plug and abandon your well for permanent prevention of interzonal migration of fluids and migration of fluids to the surface. You must reclaim your well location according to the terms of BLM approvals and orders.
#### § 3266.10 Will BLM disclose information I submit under these regulations?

All Federal and Indian data and information submitted to the BLM are subject to part 2 of this title. Part 2 includes the Department of the Interior regulations covering public disclosure of data and information contained in Department records. Certain mineral information not protected from disclosure under part 2 of this title may be made available for inspection without a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. BLM will not treat surface location, surface elevation, or well status information as confidential.
press release                                                         UPC



                 UNITED PAN-EUROPE COMMUNICATIONS N.V. ANNOUNCES
                      AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION


Amsterdam, The Netherlands - August 28, 2003: United Pan-Europe Communications
N.V. ("UPC" or the "Company") (EURONEXT Amsterdam: UPC) today announces that at
the Extraordinary General Meeting held today the required absolute majority of
shareholders voted in favour of the proposed amendment to the company's articles
of association to allow holders of the company's ordinary shares C to convert
one or more of their ordinary shares C into ordinary shares A on a one-for-one
basis. The purpose of the conversion is to facilitate the delisting of the
ordinary shares A from the Euronext Amsterdam Stock Exchange ("AEX"). It is
expected that, as previously highlighted, the last day of trading for UPC
ordinary shares A on the AEX (ticker UPC) will be September 4, 2003.



United Pan-Europe Communications N.V. is one of the leading broadband
communications and entertainment companies in Europe. Through its broadband
networks, UPC provides television, Internet access, telephony and programming
services. UPC's shares are traded on Euronext Amsterdam Exchange (UPC) and in
the United States on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board (UPCOY). UPC is
majority owned by UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (NASDAQ: UCOMA).

NOTE: Except for historical information contained herein, this release contains
forward-looking statements, which involve certain risks, and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied
by these statements. These risks and uncertainties include our ability to
restructure our outstanding indebtedness on a satisfactory and timely basis, the
ramifications of any restructuring, the acceptance and continued use by
subscribers and potential subscribers of the Company's services, changes in the
technology and competition, our ability to achieve expected operational
efficiencies and economies of scale, our ability to generate expected revenue
and achieve assumed margins, as well as other factors detailed from time to time
in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


For further information please contact:

Claire Appleby                                      Bert Holtkamp
UPC Investor Relations                              UPC Corporate Communications
+ 44 (0) 207 838 2004                               + 31 (0) 20 778 9447
Email: ir@upccorp.com                               Email: corpcomms@upccorp.com

Also, please visit www.upccorp.com for further information about UPC

---------------------------
### **Subchapter D—Possessions**

Sec.
7651.
Administration and collection of taxes in possessions.
7652.
Shipments to the United States.
7653.
Shipments from the United States.
7654.
Coordination of United States and certain possession individual income taxes.
7655.
Cross references.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XII, §1276(b), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2600, substituted "certain possession" for "Guam" in item 7654.

**1972**—Pub. L. 92–606, §1(f)(6), Oct. 31, 1972, 86 Stat. 1497, substituted "Coordination of United States and Guam individual income taxes" for "Payment to Guam and American Samoa of proceeds of tax on coconut and palm oil" in item 7654.
(No. 845

Claim denied.)

#### Malcolm B. Sterrett, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

*Contract*— State *not liable for services of a voluntary worker.*The State is not liable for the services performed by claimant who was a voluntary ' worker, although the services were performed for a department of the State.

Malcolm B. Sterrett, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant, Malcolm B. Sterrett, claims that he .was an assistant to Attorney General Brundage in 1921 and rendered services for the State in capacity of Assistant Attorney General in 1921 and up to October, 1922, for which he claims $3625.00. That the Attorney General accepted such services and paid him $250.00 on his said demand. He files no bill of ' particulars, as required under the rules of this court. He does not state whether or not it has ever been presented to any other department, etc., for payment.

The Attorney General causes and files his plea and answer, denying that the State is indebted to claimant; and states that prior to July, 1921, the Attorney General did have some conversation with claimant relative to employing him as Assistant Attorney General. That about 1st of July, 1921, the Attorney General told claimant he would not be able to employ him as one of his assistants, as he had no funds with which to pay him, and thereupon then and there claimant expressed a willingness to come into the office as “a volunteer worker, ’ ’ making use of the facilities of the office in his own behalf, and so remained till about October, 1922. Attorney • General Brundage, as stated by Attorney General Carlstrom, in his pleas and answers, denies' that he employed claimant, or called on him to render any special services or any services for which he was not compensated. But that Attorney .General Brundage did pay claimant $250.00 for “special services ’ ’ and owes him no more.

The statements of Attorney General Brundage and his deputy make it very clear to the court that there was no contract by and between the Attorney General and the claimant that would warrant a recovery against the State.

The case is accordingly dismissed.
#### § 3830.25 When do I pay for recording a new notice or certificate of location for a mining claim or site?

You must pay the service charge, location fee, and initial maintenance fee, in full, as provided in § 3830.21 of this chapter, at the time you record new notices or certificates of location with BLM.
§ 3861.2-2 Certificate of expenditures and improvements. ( a ) The claimant at the time of filing the application for patent, or at any time within the 60 days of publication, is required to file with the authorized officer a certificate of the office cadastral engineer that not less than $500 worth of labor has been expended or improvements made, by the applicant or his grantors, upon each location embraced in the application, or if the application embraces several contiguous locations held in common, that an amount equal to $500 for each location has been so expended upon, and for the benefit of, the entire group; that the plat filed by the claimant is correct; that the field notes of the survey, as filed, furnish such an accurate description of the claim as will, if incorporation in a patent, serve to identify the premises fully, and that such reference is made therein to natural objects or permanent monuments as will perpetuate and fix the locus thereof.
( b ) In case of a lode and mill-site claim in the same survey the expenditure of $500 must be shown upon the lode claim.
#### Bartolome Ensenat, Appellant, v. Harold Hanson et al., Respondents.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and MeCurn, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         442,895
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,140,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                   88
<INVENTORY>                                    328,775
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         722,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,662,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          359,521
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,291,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,662,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               719,251
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               660,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               10,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                49,001
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            41,651
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   41,651
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .069
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .069


</TABLE>
#### § 3137.110 Do the terms and conditions of a unit agreement modify Federal lease stipulations?

A unit agreement does not modify Federal lease stipulations.