alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[108th Congress Public Law 478]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ478.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 3904]]

Public Law 108-478
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
103 East Kleberg in Kingsville, Texas, as the ``Irma Rangel Post Office 
           Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2004 -  [H.R. 4829]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 103 East 
Kleberg in Kingsville, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Irma Rangel Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Irma Rangel Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved December 21, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4829:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Oct. 6, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 3861.7 Posting.
#### Samuel Bluestein, Appellant, v. David Miller, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### Williams *et al. v. Way.*

September 21, 1910.

Probate of will. Before Judge Mitchell. Thomas superior court. June 26, 1909.

*Fondren Mitchell*and *Branch & Snow,*for plaintiffs in error,.

*S. A. Boddenbery*and *Boscoe Luke,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

1. If a subscribing witness to a will is also a legatee or devisee under the will, the witness is competent, though the legacy or devise to him shall be void. Civil Code, § 3275. It is not a sufficient objection to the probate of a will in which devises to other persons are made that all of the subscribing witnesses are legatees under the will.

2. There were no requests to charge. The portions- of the charge complained of were not erroneous; nor was it error, to omit to charge, as complained. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment afp/rmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### **Subchapter E—General Provisions Relating to Distilled Spirits**

Part
I.
Return of materials used in the manufacture or recovery of distilled spirits.
II.
Regulation of traffic in containers of distilled spirits.
III.
Miscellaneous provisions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter E, Industrial Alcohol Plants, Bonded Warehouses, Denaturing Plants, and Denaturation, consisted of part I, Industrial Alcohol Plants, Bonded Warehouses, and Denaturing Plants and part II, Denaturation, and consisted of sections 5301 to 5320 and 5331 to 5334, respectively, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.
### §4167. Reports to Congress

#### (a) In general

Not later than 90 days after the conclusion of each fiscal year in which assistance under this chapter is made available, the Secretary shall submit to the Congress a report that contains—

(1) a description of the progress made in accomplishing the objectives of this chapter;

(2) a summary of the use of funds available under this chapter during the preceding fiscal year; and

(3) a description of the aggregate outstanding loan guarantees under subchapter VI.

#### (b) Related reports

The Secretary may require recipients of grant amounts under this chapter to submit to the Secretary such reports and other information as may be necessary in order for the Secretary to make the report required by subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 104–330, title IV, §407, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4041.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–330, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4016, known as the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4101 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1997, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 107 of Pub. L. 104–330, set out as a note under section 4101 of this title.
#### § 725.365 Approval of representative's fees; lien against benefits.

No fee charged for representation services rendered to a claimant with respect to any claim under this part shall be valid unless approved under this subpart. No contract or prior agreement for a fee shall be valid. In cases where the obligation to pay the attorney's fee is upon the claimant, the amount of the fee awarded may be made a lien upon the benefits due under an award and the adjudication officer shall fix, in the award approving the fee, such lien and the manner of payment of the fee. Any representative who is not an attorney may be awarded a fee for services under this subpart, except that no lien may be imposed with respect to such representative's fee.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTRENDS: The aeronautical post-test database management systemTRENDS, an engineering-test database operating system developed by NASA to support rotorcraft flight tests, is described. Capabilities and characteristics of the system are presented, with examples of its use in recalling and analyzing rotorcraft flight-test data from a TRENDS database. The importance of system user-friendliness in gaining users' acceptance is stressed, as is the importance of integrating supporting narrative data with numerical data in engineering-test databases. Considerations relevant to the creation and maintenance of flight-test database are discussed and TRENDS' solutions to database management problems are described. Requirements, constraints, and other considerations which led to the system's configuration are discussed and some of the lessons learned during TRENDS' development are presented. Potential applications of TRENDS to a wide range of aeronautical and other engineering tests are identified.Document ID19900015833Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBjorkman, W. S.*(Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc., Mountain View CA., United States)*Bondi, M. J.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberA-88225NASA-TM-101025NAS 1.15:101025Accession Number90N25149Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-51Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900015833.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3802.4-1 Noncompliance. ( a ) An operator who conducts mining operations undertaken either without an approved plan of operations or without taking actions specified in a notice of noncompliance within the time specified therein may be enjoined by an appropriate court order from continuing such operations and be liable for damages for such unlawful acts.
( b ) Whenever the authorized officer determines that an operator is failing or has failed to comply with the requirements of an approved plan of operations, or with the provisions of these regulations and that noncompliance is causing impairment of wilderness suitability or unnecessary and undue degradation of the resources of the lands involved, the authorized officer shall serve a notice of noncompliance upon the operator by delivery in person to the operator or the operator's authorized agent, or by certified mail addressed to the operator's last known address.
( c ) A notice of noncompliance shall specify in what respects the operator is failing or has failed to comply with the requirements of the plan of operations of the provisions of applicable regulations, and shall specify the actions which are in violation of the plan or regulations and the actions which shall be taken to correct the noncompliance and the time limits, not to exceed 30 days, within which corrective action shall be taken.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Community Clinical Oncology Program.
    Date: November 16-17, 2004.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Joyce C. Pegues, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Review and Logistics Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive 
Blvd., 7149, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 594-1286, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83f3e6e4f6e6f0e9c3eee2eaefadedeaebade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83f3e6e4f6e6f0e9c3eee2eaefadedeaebade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)
    Dated: September 29, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22413 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

          - 14 CFR Part 39 
          - [Docket No. 2003-NE-57-AD; Amendment 39-13798; AD 2004-19-04] 
          - RIN 2120-AA64 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

      ( print page 58258)    

# SUMMARY:

                        This document makes a correction to Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2004-19-04. That AD applies to Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211-22B, RB211-524, and RB211-535 series turbofan engines. That AD was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 22, 2004 (69 FR 56683). In the amendatory language, under § 39.13 [Amended], the amendment number for the AD was inadvertently omitted. This document corrects that omission. In all other respects, the original document remains the same.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

Effective September 30, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher Spinney, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (781) 238-7175, fax (781) 238-7199. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A final rule AD, FR Doc. 04-21173 that applies to RR RB211-22B, RB211-524, and RB211-535 series turbofan engines, was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 22, 2004 (69 FR 56683). The following correction is needed:                

§ 39.13 

On page 56684, in the second column, under § 39.13 [Amended], in the fifth line, “2004-19-04 Rolls-Royce plc: Docket No.” is corrected to read “2004-19-04 Rolls-Royce plc: Amendment 39-13798. Docket No.”.

Issued in Burlington, MA, on September 23, 2004. 

Francis A. Favara, 

Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 04-21912 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Candice L. Griffin, Relator

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 0 05 45

- CV

Trial court case number: 97725

- F

Trial court: 300th District C ourt o f Brazori a County

This Court’s July 25, 2019 Order requested a response to the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by r elator, Candice L. Griffin

, and noted, while relator’s petition made a request for a stay, relator did not file a motion for temporary relief that complies with Rule 52.10(a). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.3(j), (k), 52.7(a)(2), 52.10(a). Later on July 25, 2019, relator filed a “Supplement to Petition for Writ of Mandamus with Notice that Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus Contained a Request for Temporary Relief” to notify this Court that her petition included a request to stay the trial commencing on July 29, 2019, that complies with Rule 52.10(a). However, the Clerk of this Court’s records do not reflect

that relator has filed a separate motion for temporary relief that complies with Rule 52.10(a). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(a)(1) (“[t]he relator may file a motion to stay any underlying proceedings or for any other temporary relief pending the court’s action on the petition.”) (emphasis added).

Accordingly, the Court orders relator to file a separate motion for temporary

relief that complies with Rule 52.10(a)

. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52. 10 ( a )(1). Relator’s motion for temporary relief, if any, shall be filed by 3 :00pm Friday, July 26, 2019 , if relator requests to stay the trial commencing on July 29, 2019

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Laura C. Higley

___  Acting individually  Acting for the Court
Date: __ July 26, 2019

___
#### § 2912.3 Substitution of a new lease.

A lessee may apply for a new lease at any time. Applications for new leases shall be accompanied by consent of the lessee to cancellation of the existing lease upon the issuance of the new lease and by three copies of a statement showing (a) the need for a new lease and (b) any changes in the use or management of the lands or the terms and conditions of the lease which the applicant desires.
#### Gasoff Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Serval Food Exchange, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### Simmons Furniture and Lumber Company *v.*Reynolds.

January 11, 1911.

Complaint. Before Judge Kimsey. Hall superior court. November 2, 1909.

*J. B. Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. 0. Adams*and *H. H. Dean,*contra.

Beck, J.

1. Where a suit was brought on a promissory note, and a plea was filed which was insufficient, as, in substance, it was nothing more than a plea of the general issue, but no attack was made upon the plea by demurrer or motion to strike at the appearance term, and the court entered upon the docket, “May 14, 1909, Ans.,” the court should not at the next term have refused to allow the filing of a plea which was offered as an amendment to that previously filed, and to which no other objection was raised except that “there, was nothing to amend by.”

2. No question was raised in the court below as to the merits or sufficiency of the plea offered as an amendment, and that question is not now adjudicated.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Wish, O. J., absent.*
#### § 3505.31 May I withdraw my application after I file it?

Yes. Just send us a written request. If you withdraw your application in whole or in part before BLM signs the permit, we will refund the corresponding proportionate share of your rental payment. BLM will retain any fees already paid for processing the application.

[64 FR 53536, Oct. 1, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 58877, Oct. 7, 2005]
#### North Side Bank of Brooklyn, Plaintiff, v. Queens Home Realty and Construction Company and Others, Defendants. Alexander S. Burns, Appellant, v. Rickert-Finlay Realty Company, Respondent.

Motion granted, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 8:19 AM

To: 'eric@aviationunmanned.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Petition for Exemption: Aviation Unmanned (FAA-2014-0895)



### May 19, 2015

Mr. Eric Fay

Aviation Unmanned 4125 Centurion Way, Suite 100 Addison, TX 75001

Dear Mr. Fay:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0895). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the following for Vanguard I ndustries, LLC’s ShadowHawk UAS:

o Maximum takeoff weight

o Fuel capacity

o Transmission oil tank capacity

o Training curriculum

docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by June 2, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will

close the docket withou t notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 506.29

 506.01

 505.45

 505.32

 505.12

 504.85

 505.16

 505.05

 504.28

 503.60

 504.00

 503.74

 503.93

 503.49

 502.84

 502.46

 502.99

 503.11

 503.07

 502.03

 502.64

 501.73

 500.56

 500.11

 500.41

 500.18

 500.68

 500.78

 500.92

 499.96

 500.76

 62,429

 62,095

 61,436

 61,283

 61,048

 60,733

 61,095

 60,966

 60,074

 59,294

 59,750

 59,454

 59,670

 59,169

 58,431

 58,005

 58,599

 58,735

 58,690

 57,524

 58,207

 57,192

 55,910

 55,422

 55,747

 55,498

 56,040

 56,149

 56,300

 55,260

 56,127

STORAGE

+358

-334

-659

-153

-235

-315

+362

-129

-892

-780

+456

-296

+216

-501

-738

-426

+594

+136

-45

-1,166

+683

-1,015

-1,282

-488

+325

-249

+542

+109

+151

-1,040

+867

CHANGE

1,185

824

629

825

707

629

942

773

554

699

1,722

1,201

1,213

585

735

1,107

2,029

1,702

1,475

655

1,270

616

711

1,738

1,980

1,473

1,490

960

1,019

447

1,979

INFLOW

 998

 985

 951

 893

 815

 780

 749

 827

 994

 1,084

 1,483

 1,343

 1,091

 831

 1,096

 1,312

 1,724

 1,625

 1,492

 1,237

 918

 1,122

 1,351

 1,976

 1,807

 1,589

 1,208

 897

 936

 965

 1,536

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 7

 7

 10

 9

 10

 8

 10

 11

 10

 8

 9

 7

 13

 7

 11

 10

 6

 8

 6

 6

 8

 6

 6

 8

 9

 10

 9

 8

 7

 6

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2019 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/01/2019

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -5,944 33,874 36,615 0 0 256

ACRE-FEET -5,944 67,189 72,626 0 0 508

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 72,626

SPILL 0 72,626

 62,071

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,192

 829

 624

 834

 714

 623

 939

 776

 557

 714

 1,693

 1,225

 1,202

 598

 726

 1,101

 2,029

 1,702

 1,477

 652

 1,277

 618

 716

 1,731

 1,973

 1,407

 1,479

 964

 1,014

 465

 1,950

 33,801

 67,044

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
#### Byrd *v.*Baker.

February 17, 1911.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior court. October 16, 1909.

*John B. L. Smith*and *J. T. Hill,*for plaintiff.

*Hardeman, Jones, Callaway & Johnston,*for defendant.

Atkinson, J.

1. There was no error in the ruling of the court in excluding evidence.

2. The charge complained of in the motion for new trial was not accurate; but when considered in connection with the whole charge, neither it nor the omissions to charge, upon which error was assigned, required the grant of a new trial.

3. The grounds of the motion for new trial that the verdict was contrary to law, and without evidence to support it, were expressly abandoned by the plaintiff in error. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the .Justices concur.*