alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
118 STAT. 3964 PUBLIC LAW 108–488—DEC. 23, 2004

Public Law 108–488

108th Congress

An Act

To provide for the development of a national plan for the control and management

of Sudden Oak Death, a tree disease caused by the fungus-like pathogen

Phytophthora ramorum, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL PLAN FOR CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF

SUDDEN OAK DEATH.

(a) DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL PLAN.—Subject to the availability of appropriated funds for this purpose, the Secretary of

Agriculture, acting through the Animal Plant and Health Inspection

Service, shall develop a national plan for the control and management of Sudden Oak Death, a forest disease caused by the funguslike pathogen Phytophthora ramorum.

(b) PLAN ELEMENTS.—In developing the plan, the Secretary

shall specifically address the following:

(1) Information derived by the Department of Agriculture

from ongoing efforts to identify hosts of Phytophthora ramorum

and survey the extent to which Sudden Oak Death exists in

the United States.

(2) Past and current efforts to understand the risk posed

by Phytophthora ramorum and the results of control and

management efforts regarding Sudden Oak Death, including

efforts related to research, control, quarantine, and hazardous

fuel reduction.

(3) Such future efforts as the Secretary considers necessary

to control and manage Sudden Oak Death, including cost estimates for the implementation of such efforts.

(c) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary shall develop the plan in

consultation with other Federal agencies that have appropriate

expertise regarding the control and management of Sudden Oak

Death.

(d) IMPLEMENTATION OF PLAN.—The Secretary shall complete

the plan and commence implementation as soon as practicable

after the date on which funds are first appropriated pursuant

to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (e) to carry

out this section.

7 USC 7720.

Dec. 23, 2004

[H.R. 4569]

PUBLIC LAW 108–488—DEC. 23, 2004 118 STAT. 3965

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4569 (S. 2575):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Oct. 5, considered and passed House.

Dec. 8, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

(e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is authorized

to be appropriated to the Secretary such sums as may be necessary

to carry out this section.

Approved December 23, 2004.
#### Swiss Commerce, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Erwin Triebold, Doing Business as Fabrique d’Horlogerie Muros, et al., Respondents.

Present —■ Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Motion Granted in Part and Order filed December 15, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00721-CV

PAMELA G. KOSTAS, Appellant

V.

CYNTHIA KOSTAS; GEORGIA G. KOSTAS A/K/A GEORGIA G. 

NICHOLAS; LEGACY TRUST COMPANY, N.A; and ANN KOSTAS 

DAVIS; Appellees

On Appeal from Probate Court No 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 454096

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 18, 2018. On October 15, 

2020, appellant Pamela G. Kostas filed a motion to dismiss which we construe as a 

motion for partial disposition. Rule 42.1(b) allows for a partial disposition as 
2

follows: “A severable portion of the proceeding may be disposed of under (a) if it 

will not prejudice the remaining parties.” See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(b). In 

accordance with appellant Pamela G. Kostas’s motion to dismiss, we dismiss (1) 

the part of this appeal in which Pamela G. Kostas appeals from the trial court’s 

denial of the application for appointment of George and Stephanie Davis as 

personal representatives of the Estate of George J. Kostas, Deceased; and (2) the 

part of this appeal in which Pamela G. Kostas appeals from the trial court’s 

appointment of Legacy Trust Company, N.A., to serve as Administrator with Will 

Annexed for the Estate. To this extent, we grant Pamela G. Kostas’s motion to 

dismiss. The rest of the appeal remains pending before this court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
Exhibit 32.2


                                 Powerlinx, Inc.
      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powerlinx,  Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period  ended  September  30,  2005 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Douglas Bauer, Chief Financial
Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Powerlinx,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by  Powerlinx,  Inc.  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Douglas Bauer
-----------------
Douglas Bauer
Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2005
#### Henry J. Lunde, Inc., Respondent, v. Marlborough S. Walker et al., Defendants, and Manbay Estates, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants. (Action No. 1.)

Settle order on notice within ten days from the date of this decision. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Stephen L. Lowe, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 12072;

Fourth District

June 20, 1974.

Synek & Bishart, of Chicago (Henry T. Synek, of counsel), for appellant.

Paul R. Welch, State’s Attorney, of Bloomington (John A. Beyer and John W. Foltz, both of Circuit Attorney Project, of counsel), for the People.

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SMITH

delivered the opinion of the court:

In a bench trial in the Circuit Court of McLean County, the defendant was convicted of the crime of theft under $150 in violation of section *16*— 1(a) of the Criminal Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 38, sec. 16 — 1(a)), and a fine of $50 imposed. The only issue raised by the defendant was whether or not the evidence established his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In oral argument, this court raised the sufficiency of the information filed in this case and it was conceded by the State that the information did not allege, nor did the evidence show the ownership of the property taken. The defendant walked out of the store without paying for a book. The ownership of the book was alleged as follows: “To-wit (CO-OP Bookstore).” It is clear that such allegation is insufficient to allege or to identify a legal entity capable of property ownership. In *People v.*Hill, 68 Ill.App.2d 369, 216 N.E.2d 212, the allegation of ownership of some men’s shirts and sweaters was alleged to be in “Community Discount Store.” In that case, the conviction was reversed. The court there held that in an indictment information or complaint for theft, the ownership of the property allegedly stolen is a necessary averment; if the store was not a legal entity capable of owning property, the ownership should have been alleged in the individual or individuals who own *1036the store or, if a corporation, the corporate existence should have been alleged and proved.

It is thus apparent that the conceded error is fatal to this information and it is insufficient to support the conviction. Accordingly, the judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

CRAVEN and SIMKINS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

              Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan
and the American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (Form
S-8 No. 333-84280), and the American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. 2001
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-75606) of our report dated
February 20, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                          /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Woodland Hills, California
April 24, 2002
### **CHAPTER 63—ASSESSMENT**

Subchapter
Sec. 1
A.
In general
6201

B.
Deficiency procedures in the case of income, estate, gift, and certain excise taxes
6211
C.
Treatment of partnerships
6221
[D.
Repealed]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2015**—Pub. L. 114–74, title XI, §1101(a), (b)(2), (c)(2), Nov. 2, 2015, 129 Stat. 625, 637, added item for subchapter C and struck out former items for subchapter C "Tax treatment of partnership items" and subchapter D "Treatment of electing large partnerships".

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title XII, §1222(c), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1019, added item for subchapter D.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §1307(c)(3)(C), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1782, struck out item for subchapter D "Tax treatment of subchapter S items".

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–354, §4(b), Oct. 19, 1982, 96 Stat. 1692, added item for subchapter D.

Pub. L. 97–248, title IV, §402(b), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 667, added item for subchapter C.

**1969**—Pub. L. 91–172, title I, §101(j)(63), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 532, inserted reference to certain excise taxes in item for subchapter B.

1  Section numbers editorially supplied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn assessment of the government liquid hydrogen requirements for the 1995-2005 time frame including addendum, liquid hydrogen production and commercial demand in the United StatesLiquid hydrogen will continue to be an integral element in virtually every major space program, and it has also become a significant merchant product for certain commercial markets. Liquid hydrogen is not a universally available commodity,  and the number of supply sources historically have been limited to regions having concentrated consumption patterns. With the increased space program activity it becomes necessary to assess all future programs on a collective and unified basis. An initial attempt to identify projected requirements on a long range basis is presented.Document ID19910006853Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeOther - Collected WorksAuthorsBain, Addison*(NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center Cocoa Beach, FL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryPropellants And FuelsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103812NAS 1.15:103812Accession Number91N16166Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006853.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle19910006854WorkAn assessment of the government liquid hydrogen requirements for the 1995-2005 time frame19910006855WorkLiquid hydrogen production and commercial demand in the United Statesvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### In the Matter of Metered Oil, Inc., Appellant. Eugene Sherk et al., Constituting the Board of Appeals of the Village of Floral Park, Respondents.

Ho opinion. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of David Rogers, as Administrator, etc., of Dilana Crowell, Deceased.

Motion *933granted and appeals dismissed, with costs, including ten dollars costs of this action.
### §677n. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1009, §15, 68 Stat. 876, which related to disposal by mixed-blood members of their individual interests in tribal assets, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §1780p. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 109–286, §18, Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1230, which authorized appropriations, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of
Waterstone Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas S. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.













/s/ Douglas S.
Gordon


Douglas
S. Gordon


Chief
Executive Officer


March 11,
2009
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis of Small Aircraft as a Transportation SystemAn analysis was conducted to examine the market viability of small aircraft as a transportation mode in competition with automobile and scheduled commercial air travel by estimating the pool of users that would potentially switch to on-demand air travel due to cost/time savings. The basis for the analysis model was the Integrated Air Transportation System Evaluation Tool (IATSET) which was developed under contract to NASA by the Logistics Management Institute. IATSET is a macroeconomic model that predicts at a National level the mode choice between automobile, scheduled air, and on-demand air travel based on the value of a travelers time and monetary cost of the trip. A number of modifications are detailed to the original IATSET to better model the changing small aircraft environment. The potential trip market was modeled for the Eclipse 500 operated as a corporate jet and as an air taxi for the business travel market. The Cirrus 20R and a $80K single engine piston aircraft (based on automobile manufacturing technology) are evaluated in the pleasure and personal business travel market.Document ID20020078064Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDollyhigh, Samuel M.*(Swales Aerospace Hampton, VA United States)*Yackovetsky, Robert E.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 2002Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.16:211927NASA/CR-2002-211927Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-00135PROJECT: RTOP 706-87-11-04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020078064.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
October 15 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GUADALUPE MENDOZA , Appellant NO. 14 - 12 - 01100 - CR V. NO. 14 - 12 - 01101 - CR NO. 14 - 12 - 01102 - CR THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED . We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #P054]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration for Public Assistance on September 15, 2004 the U.S. Small Business Administration is activating its disaster loan program only for private non-profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature. I find that Berkeley, Charleston and Williamsburg Counties in the State of South Carolina 
                    ( print page 59980)
                    constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by Tropical Storm Gaston occurring on August 28-30, 2004. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on November 15, 2004 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Non-Profit Organizations without credit available elsewhere
2.900Non-Profit Organizations with credit available elsewhere
4.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is P05408. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59008). Dated: September 28, 2004. Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 04-22381 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from  Ultronics   Corporation  September  30,  1998  financial
                  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
                  such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                           0000894556
<NAME>                          Ultronics Corporation

       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      18,066
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,066
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            0
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               4,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,311)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .00
        


</TABLE>
#### Hans Federer, Respondent, v. Joseph Harris, Appellant, and Another, Defendant.

Order of the County Court of Kings county affirmed by default, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-50111 Conference Calendar

__________________
GUADALUPE SAMPAYO, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; DAN MORALES, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-95-CV-401

- - - - - - - - - - December 11, 1196 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Guadalupe Sampayo, #100237, appeals from the district court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Sampayo argues that his trial counsel wasineffective for failing to obtain a timely subpoena for a codefendant and for failing to investigate and interview potentialNo. 96-50111 -2- witnesses. He also argues that the district court abused its discretion by failing to allow him to amend his habeas petition to present a new theory of defense. We have carefully reviewed the record and the briefs. Sampayo’s ineffective-assistance claims fail because he has not demonstrated that the state courts’ determination was the result of “an unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court[.]” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). Nor did the district court abuse its discretion by denying Sampayo leave to amend his petition. See Townsend v. Sain , 372 U.S. 293, 317 (1963)(claim of factual innocence not of itself a constitutional issue upon which habeas relief may be granted), overruled on other grounds by Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes , 504 U.S. 1 (1992).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark A. Scharmann, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Bioethics, Ltd.Date:  May 19, 2023By /s/ Mark A. ScharmannMark A. ScharmannPresident, Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)