alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[GRAPHIC OMITTED] ACERGY

NEWS RELEASE

                ACERGY S.A. $58 MILLION CONTRACT AWARD IN NORWAY

London, England - September 28, 2007 - Acergy S.A. (NASDAQ NM: ACGY; Oslo Stock
Exchange: ACY) announced today the award of a contract valued at approximately
$58 million from Hydro on behalf of the Ormen Lange Licences.

The contract is for the installation of a MEG line and umbilical and tie-in and
commissioning of the MEG line, umbilical and flowlines in a water depth of
900 metres on the Ormen Lange Southern field development project. Offshore
installation will start in the second quarter of 2009.

Oeyvind Mikaelsen, Vice President Acergy Northern Europe and Canada, said, "We
welcome the award of another deepwater construction contract for Hydro for
additional work on the Ormen Lange field which follows the installation of the
export trunkline in 2006 and the MEG line work completed earlier this year."

********************************************************************************
Acergy S.A. is a seabed-to-surface engineering and construction contractor for
the offshore oil and gas industry worldwide. We plan, design and deliver
complex, integrated projects in harsh and challenging environments. We operate
internationally as one group - globally aware and locally sensitive, sharing our
expertise and experience to create innovative solutions. We are more than
solution providers, we are solution partners - ready to make long-term
investments in our people, assets, know-how and relationships in support of our
clients.
********************************************************************************

CONTACTS:

Julian Thomson/ Karen Menzel
Acergy S.A.
UK +44 20 7290 1743 / 1744
julian.thomson@acergy-group.com / karen.menzel@acergy-group.com
www.acergy-group.com

If you no longer wish to receive our press releases please contact:
kelly.good@acergy-group.com
§ 3509.50 Under what conditions would BLM reject my application for a fractional interest prospecting permit or lease? BLM will reject your fractional interest application if: ( a ) You do not meet the qualifications in § 3509.45 of this part;
( b ) You would have an interest in the total Federal and non-Federal mineral estate of less than 50% once the fractional interest prospecting permit or lease is issued, unless we determine it would be in the best interests of the government to issue the permit or lease; or
( c ) We determine that it is not in the public interest to grant the lease.
[Cite as State v. Penn, 2015-Ohio-4653.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

CLINTON COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2015-03-007 

: D E C I S I O N 

 - vs - 11/9/2015 

: 

 

LISA DAWN PENN, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM CLINTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CRI 2014 0307 

Richard W. Moyer, Clinton County Prosecuting Attorney, Brian Shidaker, 103 East Main 

Street, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for plaintiff-appellee 

Richard L. Federle, Jr., 820 Willow Bend Drive, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for defendantappellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of 

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Clinton County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Lisa Dawn Penn, has filed a brief with this 

court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) 
Clinton CA2015-03-007 

indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any 

errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of 

error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," 

Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently 

to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement 

of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that 

it is wholly frivolous. 

PIPER, P.J., S. POWELL and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1225
STEVEN PAUL FLEMING, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-97-700-WMN) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Paul Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Tamera Lynn Fine, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Steven Paul Fleming appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action challenging the Federal Aviation Administration’s denial of medical certification to fly. See 14 C.F.R. § 61.3(c) (1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fleming v. United States , No. CA-97-700-WMN (D. Md. Jan 21, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSEE Design Guide and Requirements for Electrical DeadfacingThe purpose of this design guide is to present information for understanding and mitigating the potential hazards associated with de-mating and mating powered electrical connectors on space flight vehicles. The process of staging is a necessary function in the launching of space vehicles and in the deployment of satellites, and now in manned assembly of systems in space. During this electrical interconnection process, various environments may be encountered that warrant the restriction of the voltage and current present across the pins of an electrical connector prior to separation, mating, or in a static open non-mated configuration. This process is called deadfacing. These potentially hazardous environments encompass the obvious explosive fuel vapors and human shock hazard, to multiple Electro-Magnetic Interference (EMI) phenomena related to the rapid rate of change in current as well as exposure to Radio Frequency (RF) fields.Document ID20020068038Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBerki, Joe M.*(Analex Corp. Brook Park, OH United States)*Sargent, Noel*(Analex Corp. Brook Park, OH United States)*Kauffman, W.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 2002Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberM-1053NASA/CR-2002-211839NAS 1.26:211839Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASA Order H-34132-DDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020068038.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 3585.2-2 Hardrock minerals.

Expect as otherwise specifically provided in §§ 3585.3 and 3585.4 of this title for mining claimant preference right leases, the regulations in parts 3500 and 3560 of this title shall govern the leasing of hardrock minerals.
#### Antonio Nitti, Respondent, v. John J. McGinniss, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless within twenty days the appeal be perfected, or a stipulation be presented to the court to show that the respondent has agreed to waive his right to go on with the appeal. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from Star Dolphin,  Inc. March 31, 1998  financial  statements
                  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such
                  financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                          0000894532
<NAME>                         STAR DOLPHIN, INC.

       

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                            0
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  0
<PP&E>                                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             3,000
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                          2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                        (5,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      0
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  0
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  3,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   (3,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               (3,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (3,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     .00
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (740)
<INVENTORY>                                    109,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,854
<PP&E>                                         109,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,890)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 413,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,123
<BONDS>                                        198,524
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   413,189
<SALES>                                        229,890
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               230,681
<CGS>                                          190,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  190,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,028)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,202
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,230)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,230)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (7.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.13)
        

</TABLE>
§ 3585.0-3 Authority. ( a ) Authority for leasing minerals in the White Mountains National Recreation Area—Alaska is found in § 3500.0-3(c)(5) of this title.
( b ) Authority for approving exploration licenses is section 302(b) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1732(b)).
#### § 3809.423 How long does my plan of operations remain in effect?

Your plan of operations remains in effect as long as you are conducting operations, unless BLM suspends or revokes your plan of operations for failure to comply with this subpart.
<PAGE>

EX - 11.1

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                        SEAVIEW VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                                    EXHIBIT
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Quarter         Quarter         Nine Months      Nine Months
                                                 Ended Sept. 30,   Ended Sept. 30,        Ended           Ended
                                                       2000             1999         Sept. 30, 2000    Sept. 30,1999
                                                 ---------------   --------------   ----------------  ---------------
<S>                                              <C>               <C>              <C>               <C>
Net income ...................................     $   216,132       $     9,845       $   155,128      $    46,949

Shares:

Basic weighted average number of
    shares outstanding .......................       9,821,449         6,430,000         9,187,858        6,430,000
Additional shares adjusted-under nonvested
    stock for diluted earnings per share .....       3,149,715         2,586,282         3,149,223        2,622,822
                                                   -----------       -----------       -----------      -----------
Diluted weighted average number
    of shares outstanding ....................      12,971,164         9,016,282        12,337,081        9,052,822

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income ...................................     $      .022       $      .002       $      .017      $      .007

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income ...................................     $      .017       $      .001       $      .013      $      .005
</TABLE>

                                      17
## Kruger , Bret t(OST) - ^.iljmil^Q r From : Davi d M . Endersbe e [dmendersbee@zsrlaw.com ] ~ i'^l:-i n i(^, ' •^'' > Sent : Thursday , Marc h 15 , 201 2 12:1 9 P M • - 1 '-'iLiiAFiOlv S To : Kruger , Bret t(OST ) Cc : Richar d D . Mathia s •^ ? M' P ; C : Q i.r- ^ Subject : AlitaliaCityLinerS.p.A./Docl<etOST-2012-003 8 ' " ' ' ^ " V_ • Dea rBrett , Thi s i s t o confir m tha tAlitali a CityLine rS.p.A . ("CityLiner" ) seek s exemptio n authorit yan d a statemen to fauthorizatio n onl yt o th e exten tnecessar yt o displa yDelta' s DL * cod e o n CityLiner' s flight s (operate d o n behal fo fAlitalia ) withi n th e E U an d betwee n th e E U an d thir d countries . CityLine rdoe s no titsel finten d t o engag e i n foreig n ai rtransportatio n betwee n th e E U an d th e U.S . Sincerely , Davi d M . Endersbe e Associat e Zuckert , Scout t& Rasenberger , L.L.P . 88 8 Seventeent h Street , N.W . Washington , D.C . 2000 6 

### Tel : 202-973-793 5 Fax : 202-342-068 3 

### Cell : 571-271-761 6 dmendersbee@zsrlaw.co m www.zsrlaw.com/dm e

- Visi tou rne wwebsit e - www.zsriaw.co m -
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Christopher Nowers, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Avantogen Oncology, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as the end of the period covered by this report; and

c) presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on our evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report.



Date: November 10, 2006By:

/s/ Christopher NowersChristopher NowersChief Executive Officer
#### Robert Binder, Appellant, v. Samuel Marcus, Respondent.

No opinion. Present -— Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *post,*p. 937.]
PUBLIC LAW 108–404—OCT. 30, 2004 118 STAT. 2259

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5051:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Oct. 6, considered and passed House.

Oct. 10, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–404

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1001 Williams

Street in Ignacio, Colorado, as the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1001 Williams Street in Ignacio, Colorado, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Leonard

C. Burch Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 30, 2004.

Oct. 30, 2004

[H.R. 5051]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 613

 640

 645

 638

 643

 660

 667

 661

 677

 663

 699

 685

 678

 714

 690

 673

 602

 628

 700

 713

 758

 751

 683

 717

 658

 639

 617

 613

 630

 642

 540

 568

 606

 613

 589

 612

 603

 620

 642

 624

 661

 659

 644

 670

 647

 528

 526

 592

 635

 641

 674

 661

 636

 610

 603

 571

 563

 577

 603

 579

 577

 604

 620

 628

 626

 633

 642

 636

 660

 643

 675

 671

 656

 691

 675

 622

 573

 606

 660

 681

 706

 708

 660

 661

 637

 598

 587

 599

 618

 620

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 18, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 11,986

 12,311

 12,653

 13,005

 13,343

 13,678

 14,014

 14,354

 14,725

 15,096

 15,522

 15,947

 16,336

 16,760

 17,153

 17,503

 17,804

 18,120

 18,461

 18,716

 18,922

 19,078

 19,129

 19,143

 19,116

 19,091

 19,072

 19,092

 19,142

 19,173

 400

 410

 422

 434

 445

 456

 467

 478

 491

 503

 517

 532

 545

 559

 572

 583

 593

 604

 615

 624

 631

 636

 638

 638

 637

 636

 636

 636

 638

 639

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 501.23

 500.95

 500.72

 500.90

 501.00

 499.38

 498.49

 499.46

 498.55

 502.68

 502.09

 501.94

 501.57

 500.95

 500.71

 500.62

 500.47

 500.68

 500.91

 502.88

 503.66

 504.05

 504.46

 504.28

 503.75

 503.08

 502.72

 502.45

 502.33

 502.09

 502.06

 56,641

 56,333

 56,083

 56,279

 56,387

 54,641

 53,700

 54,727

 53,763

 58,252

 57,591

 57,424

 57,016

 56,333

 56,073

 55,975

 55,812

 56,040

 56,289

 58,476

 59,362

 59,808

 60,282

 60,074

 59,465

 58,701

 58,296

 57,994

 57,860

 57,591

 57,557

STORAGE

-353

-308

-250

+196

+108

-1,746

-941

+1,027

-964

+4,489

-661

-167

-408

-683

-260

-98

-163

+228

+249

+2,187

+886

+446

+474

-208

-609

-764

-405

-302

-134

-269

-34

CHANGE

35

59

86

311

573

140

381

1,542

880

3,625

1,937

890

395

233

188

160

127

324

336

1,314

953

828

842

496

295

209

181

150

234

158

193

INFLOW

 212

 212

 211

 211

 383

 601

 601

 602

 175

 0

 0

 176

 601

 576

 318

 208

 208

 208

 208

 209

 504

 602

 602

 601

 601

 592

 383

 300

 300

 292

 209

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 134

 418

 232

 420

 1,156

 1,037

 888

 383

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 21

 0

 33

 324

 1,382

 414

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 0

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2017 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 02/01/2017

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +563 18,075 10,906 4,668 2,174 40

ACRE-FEET +563 35,852 21,632 9,259 4,312 79

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 21,632

SPILL 9,259 35,203

 56,994

OUTLET 4,312

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 23

 31

 15

 37

 137

 41

 211

 15

 29

 16

 29

 125

 70

 16

 28

 18

 16

 19

 43

 16

 121

 43

 44

 146

 34

 71

 28

 29

 129

 64

 113

 1,757

 3,485

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.