alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 3175.45 Gas chromatographs.

GCs that meet the standards in §§ 3175.117 and 3175.118 for determining heating value and relative density are approved for use.
### §450m. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 450m was editorially reclassified as section 5330 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22224]



[[Page 59277]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 
92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and 
Education (9487).
    Dates: October 20, 2004, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., October 21, 2004, 
8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Place: Stafford I, Room 1235, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Margaret Cavanaugh, Directorate for 
Geosciences, National Science Foundation, Suite 705, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230. Phone: (703) 292-8500.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations, and 
oversight concerning support for environmental research and 
education.
    Agenda:

October 20
    Update on recent NSF environmental activities.
    Report on NSF-DOE Water workshop.
    Discussion of ACERE document on strategies for Complex 
Environmental Systems research and education and occasional papers.
    AC-ERE task group meetings.
October 21
    AC-ERE task group reports.
    Meeting with the Acting Director.
    Presentation on ``MIT-CC Partnership''.
    Panel on NSF Diversity Programs.

    Dated: September 28, 2004.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-22224 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          42,260
<SECURITIES>                                   142,236
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,095
<INVENTORY>                                     40,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               321,953
<PP&E>                                          67,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 363,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,980
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,530
<OTHER-SE>                                     318,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   363,861
<SALES>                                        212,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               212,714
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,524
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,344
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,180
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,180
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
                FORM 10-K/A FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Executive Officer of Callisto  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-K/A of the Company  for the year ended  December  31, 2004 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K/A").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained
in the Form 10-K/A  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 6, 2005
                                        /s/ Gary S. Jacob
                                        ------------------------
                                        Gary S. Jacob
                                        Chief Executive Officer
#### John A. Fookes v. Union Oil Company of California.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §416d. Advance payment of rent or other consideration

No rent or other consideration for the use of land leased under sections 416 to 416j of this title shall be paid or collected more than one year in advance, unless so provided in the lease.

(Pub. L. 89–715, §5, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1113.)
Sacramento R iver

T16N R1W

CCOOLLUUSSAA CC OO

20

29

19

17

21

30

28

16

18

89.26 L

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

Contract No. 14-06-200-2851A-R-1

Exhibit B

Butte Creek Farms, Inc.

725-202-10

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.25 0.5

Miles

Date: October 25, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\butte_creek_farms2851\butte_creek_farms2851.mxd
```

               Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. "1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. "1350, I, the undersigned
Chairman & CEO of Seaview Video Technology Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify,
based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company
for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

George S. Bernardich, III
November 19, 2002

               Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. "1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. "1350, I, the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of Seaview Video Technology Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Douglas Bauer
November 19, 2002
```
### §1721. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §2, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1785, which set out Congressional findings and declaration of policy, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 96–420, §1, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1785, provided that Pub. L. 96–420, enacting this subchapter, could be cited as the "Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980".
### §1803. Grants authorized

#### (a) Purposes

The Secretary shall, subject to appropriations, make grants pursuant to this subchapter to tribally controlled colleges or universities to aid in the post-secondary education of Indian students.

#### (b) Deposit of funds; limitations on uses

Grants made pursuant to this subchapter shall go into the general operating funds of the institution to defray, at the determination of the tribally controlled college or university, expenditures for academic, educational, and administrative purposes and for the operation and maintenance of the college or university. Funds provided pursuant to this subchapter shall not be used in connection with religious worship or sectarian instruction.

(Pub. L. 95–471, title I, §102, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1326; Pub. L. 98–192, §3(a), Dec. 1, 1983, 97 Stat. 1336; Pub. L. 105–244, title IX, §901(b)(5), (6), (12), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1828.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–244, §901(b)(6), substituted "colleges or universities" for "community colleges".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–244, §901(b)(5), (12), substituted "controlled college or university" for "controlled community college" and "the college or university" for "the college".

1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–192, §3(a)(1), substituted "shall, subject to appropriations," for "is authorized to".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–192, §3(a)(2), substituted "to defray, at the determination of the tribally controlled community college, expenditures for academic, educational, and administrative purposes and for the operation and maintenance of the college" for "to defray the expense of activities related to education programs for Indian students".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–244 effective Oct. 1, 1998, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 105–244, see section 3 of Pub. L. 105–244, set out as a note under section 1001 of Title 20, Education.
§ 30.417 How does the judge notify the parties whether there was a successful bid? ( a ) When a judge determines that a bid is successful, the judge will issue a Notice of Successful Bid to all bidders, BTFA, the BIA agency that prepared the probate file, and the BIA agency having jurisdiction over the interest sold. The Notice of Successful Bid will include the following information: ( 1 ) The parcel and interest sold;
( 2 ) The identity of the successful bidder;
( 3 ) The amount of the successful bid; and
( 4 ) Instructions to the successful bidder to submit payment for the interest.
( b ) If no successful bids are received, the judge will issue an order denying the request to purchase the property.
[86 FR 72090, Dec. 20, 2021, as amended at 88 FR 39769, June 20, 2023]
### §3511. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–164, title X, §1011(a)(6), Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1061

Section, Pub. L. 96–53, title IV, §411, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 376, required the President to submit an annual report to Congress relating to the operations of the Institute during the preceding fiscal year, and set forth the contents of such report.
§ 2932.26 How will BLM decide whether to issue a Special Recreation Permit? BLM has discretion over whether to issue a Special Recreation Permit. We will base our decision on the following factors to the extent that they are relevant: ( a ) Conformance with laws and land use plans;
( b ) Public safety,
( c ) Conflicts with other uses,
( d ) Resource protection,
( e ) The public interest served,
( f ) Whether in the past you complied with the terms of your permit or other authorization from BLM and other agencies, and
( g ) Such other information that BLM finds appropriate.
(No. 1124

Claimant awarded $400.00.)

#### William M. Rossell, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 10, 1927.*

Fees & *salaries*— when *award will he made.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court in *Blasi*v. *State, supra.*

Harry Smitz, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Merrill F. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

William M. Eossell presents a claim against the State on account of a deficiency in salary, allotted to the chief inspector in the Division of Private .Employment Agencies, in the Department of Labor for deputy hire, said claimant being a deputy in said service. It appears that the General Assembly in making the appropriation for the salaries in question, did not take into consideration that the law enacted contains a provision as follows: “If the deputy inspector has served or hereafter serves more than one year, $100 shall be added to his salary for each year of service until a maximum salary of $3000 is reached,” and that no allowance for such increase in salary is made in the law.

The Attorney General of the State of Illinois has filed a demurrer, which is sustained, as a matter of law.

George B. Arnold, Director of Labor of the State of Illinois, has recommended that this deficiency be awarded to the employee.

We accordingly award to the claimant the sum of $400.00.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,114

 1,108

 1,102

 1,113

 1,120

 1,105

 1,107

 1,110

 1,103

 1,099

 1,110

 1,120

 1,122

 1,125

 1,127

 1,130

 1,134

 1,137

 1,135

 1,139

 1,143

 1,145

 1,147

 1,146

 1,156

 1,158

 1,165

 1,154

 1,110

 996

 941

 1,081

 1,039

 1,078

 1,081

 1,019

 1,066

 1,070

 1,068

 1,073

 1,018

 1,049

 1,020

 995

 1,067

 1,114

 1,090

 1,124

 1,112

 1,110

 1,131

 1,132

 1,131

 1,137

 1,132

 1,136

 1,134

 1,139

 1,070

 911

 919

 901

 1,100

 1,089

 1,092

 1,093

 1,082

 1,080

 1,081

 1,082

 1,084

 1,085

 1,093

 1,105

 1,109

 1,116

 1,120

 1,121

 1,128

 1,128

 1,130

 1,135

 1,138

 1,142

 1,142

 1,140

 1,146

 1,149

 1,152

 1,130

 1,056

 962

 923

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 702.273 Adjudication by Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge.

The Office of Administrative Law Judges is responsible for final determinations of all disputed issues connected with the discrimination complaint, including the amount of penalty to be assessed, and shall proceed with a formal hearing as described in §§ 702.331 to 702.394.

[42 FR 45302, Sept. 9, 1977]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBenefits of Force Limiting Vibration TestingForce limited random vibration testing is used at NASA John Glenn Research Center (formerly NASA Lewis Research Center) for qualifying aerospace hardware for flight. The benefit of force limiting testing is that it limits overtesting of flight hardware, by controlling input force and acceleration from the shaker (dual control) to the test article. The purpose of force limiting is to replicate the test article resonant response for the actual flight mounting condition. The force limiting testing technology has been implemented at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for the past 10 years on various spacecraft testing programs. The Cassini mission to Saturn, most notably, utilized force limiting vibration testing as part of the spacecraft system level vibration testing. NASA John Glenn Research Center is responsible for microgravity combustion and fluid science research on the Shuttle and the International Space Station. Qualification testing of delicate and vibration sensitive science instrumentation is particularly challenging to successfully qualify for flight. In order to facilitate the testing process, force limiting has been implemented to minimize overtesting of flight hardware. This paper will address recent flight camera testing (qualification random vibration and strength testing) for the Combustion Module-2 mission and the impact of Semi-empirical Method force limits.Document ID19990095797Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsMcNelis,  Mark E.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Scharton, Terry D.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1999Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209382E-11809NASA/TM-1999-209382Meeting InformationMeeting: Congress on Sound and VibrationLocation: CopenhagenCountry: DenmarkStart Date: July 5, 1999End Date: July 8, 1999Sponsors:Danish Acoustical Society,Technical Univ. of Denmark,International Inst. of Acoustics and Vibration,Odegaard and Danneskiold-Samsoe,Brueel and Kjaer A/SFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 963-10-0BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990095797.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

October 29, 2010

Mr. Jeremy C. Martin

Simpson * Martin, LLP

1349 Empire Central Drive

Woodview Tower, Suite 600

Dallas, TX 75247-4042

Mr. Michael V. Bourland

Bourland Wall & Wentzel

301 Commerce St., Ste. 1500

Fort Worth, TX 76102-4115

Mr. Paul M. Koning

K&L Gates LLP

1717 Main Street, Suite 2800

Dallas, TX 75201-7342

Mr. William D. Sims Jr.

Vinson & Elkins

2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3700

Dallas, TX 75201-2975

Honorable Robert E. Price

Judge, Probate Court No. 2

509 Main Street, Rm. 211

Dallas, TX 75202-3513

Mr. Brent Edward Basden

K&L Gates LLP

1717 Main Street, Suite 2800

Dallas, TX 75201

Mr. George W. Bramblett Jr.

Haynes & Boone, LLP

2323 Victory Avenue,  Suite 700

Dallas, TX 75219

Mr. M. Forest Nelson

Burt Barr & Associates

P. O. Box 223667

Dallas, TX 75222-3667

Mr. P. Michael Jung

Strasburger & Price, L.L.P.

901 Main Street, Suite 4400

Dallas, TX 75202-3794

Mr. Tom Moore Dees III

Hallett & Perrin

2001 Bryan St., Ste. 3900

Dallas, TX 75201

Ms. Laurie E. Ratliff

Ikard & Golden, P.C.

400 West 15th Street, Suite 975

Austin, TX 78701

Mr. B. Patrick Shaw

Woodward & Shaw

1111 Two Energy Square 

4849 Greenville Avenue

Dallas, TX 75206

Mr. Donald E. Godwin

Godwin Ronquillo LLP

1201 Elm Street, Suite 1700

Dallas, TX 75270

RE:Case Number:  10-0272

Court of Appeals Number:  05-10-00447-CV

Trial Court Number:  PR-07-2210-2(A)

Style:IN RE  ALBERT G. HILL, III AND ERIN HILL

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas granted the Motion to Abate Original Proceeding Pending Finalization of Global Settlement and issued the enclosed abatement order in the above-referenced case.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

**Case No. 10-0272Page 2**
# NEWS RELEASE July 29, 2014 Contact Senna Dodd at 404-256-4050 or benitadodd@georoiapolicy.org



## EPA Carbon Regulations 'Bad forGeorgia,' Says Foundation President Atlanta

- Kelly McCutchen, president and CEO ofthe Georgia Public Policy Foundation, madethe following remarks attoday's Stop the EPA Power Grab Rally organized byAmericans for Prosperfty outside the Sam Nunn Federal Building in Atlanta. The Environmental Protection Agency is holding two days ofhearings in Atlanta on its Clean Power Plan to reduce carbon emissions. My name is Kelly McCutchen and I'm president ofthe Georgia Public Policy Foundation. We are a nonpartisan research organization that analyzes public policy. We have analyzedthis public policy and have concluded that itis bad for Georgia. The EPA'sstated goal wasto reduce carbon emissions to limitthe threat ofglobal warming -or climate change- orwhateverthey are calling ittoday. But bythe EPA's own admission, these regulations will NOT have a significant impact on global carbon emissions. One thing we do know-thisWILL raise the cost of electricity. So we are raising the cost ofliving for everyonewhen so many people are struggling to paytheir bills, and we're reducing our economic competitiveness - at a time when we need more economic growth and morejobs And we're asked - No, we're being 

### told-to make greatsacrifices in orderto make a minimal impact on global carbon emissions with no assurances that other nationswill follow us. We now know howthiswill end. Take a look at Australia, where theyjust repealed their carbon tax due to its negative toll on their economy. We don't need these regulations. For decades, American ingenuity has allowed us to keep up with growing energy demands and REDUCE pollution atthe sametime. Sadly now, instead of investing our scarce resources into research and developmentto fund breakthroughs in areas like energy storage, we will be wasting millions of dollars on regulatory compliance costs and higher energy prices. That is clearly a waste of 1,600 pieces ofpaper. Foundation Vice President Benita Dodd, who heads up the Foundation's Environmental Initiative, will testify Tuesday at 6:45p.m. atthe EPA hearings, which were relocated from the Nunn federal Building tothe Omni Hotel in Atlanta.

Aboutthe Georgia Public Policy Foundation: Established in 1991, the Foundation is an independent, stalefocused thinktank that proposes market-oriented approaches to public policy to improve the lives ofGeorgians. Regular events include Leadership Breakfasts and Policy Briefing Luncheons. Weekly publications are the Friday Facts and Friday Idea commentaries. Visit ourWeb site atgeorgiapolicy.org. Join The Forum at forum.georgiapolicy.orq. Like the Foundation's Facebook page at facebook.com/GeorqiaPolicy and follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/gppf.



### 3200 Cohh Galleria Parkway • Suite 21-+ • Atlanta. GA 30339 • Phone: -+0-+-256-4050 • www.georgiapolicy.org
#### In the Matter of Max Gerber, an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.

First Department,

June 30, 1949.

*Einar Chrystie*for petitioner.

*Max Gerber,*respondent in person.

*Per Curiam.*

The respondent received from Ms clients a sum of money to be used for a specific purpose. The money was not *575so used. After complaint had been made to the petitioner herein, the respondent repaid his clients in full. Because of that fact and other mitigating circumstances, the court is of the opinion that a suspension for one year will be sufficient punishment.

The respondent should be suspended for one year, with leave to apply for reinstatement at the expiration of that term upon proof of his compliance with the conditions incorporated in the order.

Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.,. concur.

Bespondent suspended for one year.
#### Tillie Horenstein, Respondent, v. Max Schein and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with David Zibuloff, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.