alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   infomration  extracted  from
     STAR DOLPHIN, INC. June 30, 1996 financial  statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894532
<NAME>                        STAR DOLPHIN, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
(March 24, 1949.)

#### Nathan Solomon, as President of Retail & Wholesale Employees Union, Local 830, Respondent, *v.*Henry Modell & Co., Inc., Appellant.

*700*Per Curiam.*

We think that the complaint is sufficient. If upon a hearing it be determined that plaintiff is the party with whom defendant has contracted and that plaintiff is entitled to equitable aid in enforcement of defendant’s contractual obligations, plaintiff may be accorded such relief as is proper in an injunction action of this character. The order directing a hearing to be held on plaintiff’s motion for an injunction *pendente lite*and the order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s application for such relief without setting it down for a hearing together with the order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency should be affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent.

The date for the hearing to proceed shall be fixed in the order to be settled herein.

Crlennon, J. P,, Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The date for the hearing to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle orders on notice.
### PART VIII—CERTAIN SAVINGS ENTITIES

Sec.
529.
Qualified tuition programs.
529A.
Qualified ABLE programs.
530.
Coverdell education savings accounts.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2014**—Pub. L. 113–295, div. B, title I, §102(e)(4), (6), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4062, substituted "CERTAIN" for "HIGHER EDUCATION" in heading and added item 529A.

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–311, title IV, §408(b)(2), Oct. 4, 2004, 118 Stat. 1192, amended directory language of Pub. L. 107–22, §1(a)(6). See 2001 Amendment note below.

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–22, §1(a)(6), July 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 196, as amended by Pub. L. 108–311, title IV, §408(b)(2), Oct. 4, 2004, 118 Stat. 1192, substituted "Coverdell education savings accounts" for "Education individual retirement accounts" in item 530.

Pub. L. 107–16, title IV, §402(a)(4)(E), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 61, struck out "State" before "tuition" in item 529.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title II, §§211(e)(1)(A), 213(e)(3), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 812, 817, substituted "HIGHER EDUCATION SAVINGS ENTITIES" for "QUALIFIED STATE TUITION PROGRAMS" in heading and added item 530.
Filed 2/11/14 In re U.V. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re U.V., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.
U.V., Defendant and Appellant. F067761 (Super. Ct. No. JW130859)



### OPINION

THE COURT * APPEAL from a judgment of the Superi or Court of Kern County. Peter A. Warmerdam, Referee. Rex Adam Williams, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-

* Before Levy, Acting P.J., P oochigian, J., and Detjen, J.2 INTRODUCTION On June 18, 2013, a petition was filed pur suant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 alleging that appellant, U.V., co mmitted an assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)). 1 It was further alleged that appellant inflicted great bodily injury on th e victim (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)). Following a contested jurisdiction hearing, the juvenile court found the allegations true. On July 26, 2013, th e juvenile court found the offe nse to be a felony, declared appellant a ward of the court, found a maximu m term of confinement of seven years, and placed him on probation upon va rious terms and conditions in cluding his commitment to the Crossroads Facility. Appellate co unsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v

. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ).
FACTS At about 3:30 p.m. on June 12 , 2013, A.G. and his girlfri end L. were in McFarland walking home from the bus when appellant approached them on foot. Appellant had been dating L., but they broke up in early June. As appellant passed them, he hit A.G. in the head with a metal pipe. A.G. blacked out. When A. G. regained consciousness, appellant was hitting him in the head with the pipe. A.G. wa s taken to the hospital where he received five staples in his head. When the police questioned appellant the ne xt day, appellant admitted that he was upset because he saw L. dating someone new. Appellant admitted confronting A.G. and striking him in the head and upper body four to six times with a pipe. Appellant showed the investigating officers where he had hidden the pipe.

1 Unless otherwise noted, all statutor y references are to the Penal Code.3 APPELLATE COURT REVIEW Appellant’s appointed appellate coun sel has filed an opening brief that summarizes the pertinent facts, raises no issu es, and requests this court to review the record independently. ( Wende , supra , 25 Cal.3d 436.) By lette r on November 13, 2013, we invited appellant to subm it additional briefing. To date, he has not done so. After independent review of the r ecord, we have concluded there are no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues.
DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.
#### Van Dyke *vs.*Van Dyke and others.

1. When a cause is set down for bearing on bill, answer and replication, *the*answer is *to he*taken as true in all matters responsive to tire bill, but is no evidence of matters set up by way of confession and avoidance. Such matter, to be available to the defendant, must be proved by testimony.

*1812. An objection to tlio competency of tlie complainant to maintain his •suit, hv reason of his failure to join with him an alleged necessary party, cannot avail a defendant, who has proceeded to hearing upon hill and answer, without making proof of the interest of such party in the subject mailer of the suit.

On final hearing, on bill, answer and replication.

*31 J’ -L. Voorhees,*for complainant.

*3L\*C *L. Corbin,*for defendant II. L, r L Van Dyke.

The Chancellor.

The bill is filed to foreclose two mortgages upon land ; one given to the complainant, and the other to Ann W. Van Dyke, who subsequently married O. S. Belden, and after-wards, with her husband, duly assigned it to C. Lippincott and D. P. Darrell, by whom it was assigned to the complainant. The defendant, Ilenry L. XL Van Dyke, has answered. The bill has been taken as confessed as against all the other defendants. The complainant has filed a replication to the answer. Yo testimony lias been taken in the cause. The answer admits the making of the mortgages, and the assignments, but “charges and insists,” that the assignment from Mrs. Belden and her husband, which is set out in the bill as an absolute assignment, was not, in fact, absolute, but was a mere hypothecation to secure a loan or debt due from Mrs. Belden, the precise amount whereof is unknown to the answering defendant, but which it *“*charges,” amounts to less than one-half of the amount of the mortgage, and that the mortgage is, as to the excess, held in trust by the complainant for her. The answer also insists, that the complainant cannot, therefore, maintain a suit to foreclose that mortgage in his own name alone, but must join Mrs. Belden as a complainant with him. When a cause is set ■down for hearing on bill, answer and replication, the answer is to be taken as true in all matters responsive to the bill, *182but is no evidence of matters 'set up by way of confession and avoidance. Such matter, to be available to the defendant, must be proved by testimony. *Roberts*v. *Birgess,*5 *C. E. Green*139. There is, therefore, nothing to sustain the allegation of the answer as to the interest of Mrs. Belden in the mortgage assigned by her. The objection, based on the alleged necessity of her presence as a complainant in the cause, cannot, therefore, be sustained. There will be a decree for the complainant, accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF

THE UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
BankUnited Financial Corporation, a Florida corporation (the Company), for the three months ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on or about the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), I, Humberto L. Lopez, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|SENIOR EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
|                                                                                         
|/s/ HUMBERTO L. LOPEZ                                                                    
|Humberto L. Lopez                                                                        

Dated: February 11, 2008
----

**Exhibit 99.5**

|        |                                                            |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP** |
|   | **     Chartered    Accountants**      |
|   |      111 5th    Avenue SW, Suite 3100  |
|   |      Calgary,    Alberta               |
|   |      Canada T2P    5L3                 |
|   |      Telephone +1    (403) 509 7500    |
|   |      Facsimile +1    (403) 781 1825    |

Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the inclusion in theProvident Energy Trust 's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December31, 2003 of our audit report dated March 11, 2004, on the consolidated balancesheets of Provident Energy Trust as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and theconsolidated statements of operations and accumulated loss and cash flows forthe years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002. 

 

Chartered Accountants Calgary, Alberta March 11, 2004 
 

PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited,each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,721
<SECURITIES>                                    14,013
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                       335
<INVENTORY>                                      4,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,538
<PP&E>                                           4,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,183
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           193
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,878
<SALES>                                          7,674
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,674
<CGS>                                            3,722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    20
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    213
<INCOME-TAX>                                        11
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                202
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       202
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jerry Donell Hart , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00236

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 23F0624

- 102 ). Panel cons ists of Chief Justice Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice van Cleef

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court below. We affirm the judgment of the tri al court. We note that the appellant, Jerry Donell Hart , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 4 , 2024 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Aut rey , Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          28,840
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,404
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 257,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          722,739
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,124,709)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   257,463
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,808
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               143,825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             236,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (242,050)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (242,050)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (242,050)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### §715. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–42, §2, June 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 91, which set out definitions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 101–42, §1, June 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 91, provided that Pub. L. 101–42, enacting this subchapter, could be cited as the "Coquille Restoration Act".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 829.49

 829.36

 829.27

 829.19

 829.13

 829.07

 829.00

 828.94

 828.81

 828.74

 828.68

 828.60

 828.52

 828.46

 828.39

 828.33

 828.27

 828.21

 828.14

 828.10

 828.02

 827.98

 827.92

 827.87

 827.80

 827.72

 827.63

 827.56

 827.48

 827.40

 827.33

 36.65

 36.51

 36.41

 36.32

 36.26

 36.19

 36.12

 36.05

 35.91

 35.84

 35.77

 35.69

 35.60

 35.54

 35.46

 35.40

 35.33

 35.27

 35.19

 35.15

 35.07

 35.02

 34.96

 34.91

 34.83

 34.75

 34.65

 34.58

 34.50

 34.41

 34.34

STORAGE

-0.11

-0.14

-0.10

-0.09

-0.07

-0.07

-0.08

-0.07

-0.14

-0.08

-0.07

-0.09

-0.09

-0.06

-0.08

-0.06

-0.06

-0.06

-0.08

-0.04

-0.09

-0.04

-0.06

-0.05

-0.08

-0.08

-0.10

-0.07

-0.08

-0.08

-0.07

CHANGE

-23

-36

-15

4

10

13

8

11

-22

7

10

2

0

11

6

11

9

9

5

20

-2

20

8

16

6

0

-6

5

0

0

4

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

SPILL

 6

 6

 6

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

 8

OUTLET

 6

 9

 8

 9

 5

 8

 8

 6

 11

 7

 5

 7

 5

 5

 6

 5

 3

 3

 5

 3

 3

 4

 2

 5

 6

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

C.F.S.

 .17

 .25

 .23

 .25

 .15

 .22

 .23

 .18

 .32

 .20

 .15

 .19

 .16

 .14

 .19

 .15

 .10

 .10

 .14

 .10

 .10

 .12

 .07

 .15

 .18

 .12

 .13

 .12

 .12

 .11

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

OCTOBER 2017 RUN DATE: 12/06/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -2.44 91 242 900 167 4.92 .00

ACRE-FEET -2,440 180 480 1,785 331

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,785

OUTLET

TOTAL

 480

 2,265

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2017 .08

 36.76

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = .00
#### Eleanor H. Bowman, Respondent, v. Charles N. Talbot et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Appeal by defendant Charles N. Talbot from the referee’s report and decision, from each finding of fact and conclusion of law, and from every refusal to find facts and conclusions of law submitted by said defendant, dismissed, without costs. Present — Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ. [See *post,*p. 718.]