alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3835.93 What happens if BLM finds a defect in my waiver request? ( a ) BLM will send you a notice describing the defect by certified mail-return receipt requested at the most recent address you gave us on— ( 1 ) Your notice or certificate of location;
( 2 ) An address correction you have filed with BLM;
( 3 ) A valid transfer document filed with BLM; or
( 4 ) The waiver request form.
( b ) If the certified mail is delivered to your most recent address of record, this constitutes legal service even if you do not actually receive the notice or decision. (See 43 CFR 1810.2.)
( c ) You must cure the defective waiver or pay the annual maintenance fees within 60 days of receiving BLM notification of the defects, or forfeit the claim or site.
#### Josephine Tarolli, Respondent, v. Town of Geddes et al., Appellants.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to the appellants to answer within ten days after service of a copy of the order herein with notice of entry thereof. All concur. (The order denies defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint in an action for a declaratory judgment declaring a zoning ordinance to be unreasonable, unconstitutional and void, and restraining the enforcement thereof as to plaintiff’s property.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Yaughan and Kimball, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 508.85

 508.29

 507.85

 509.14

 508.93

 508.82

 508.62

 508.65

 508.48

 509.29

 509.13

 508.87

 508.79

 508.71

 508.77

 508.87

 508.77

 509.00

 508.48

 508.68

 509.07

 509.16

 509.30

 508.84

 508.97

 509.16

 508.71

 508.78

 508.47

 508.28

 508.01

 65,535

 64,846

 64,307

 65,895

 65,634

 65,498

 65,252

 65,289

 65,080

 66,082

 65,882

 65,560

 65,461

 65,363

 65,437

 65,560

 65,437

 65,720

 65,080

 65,326

 65,807

 65,920

 66,094

 65,523

 65,683

 65,920

 65,363

 65,449

 65,068

 64,834

 64,501

STORAGE

+406

-689

-539

+1,588

-261

-136

-246

+37

-209

+1,002

-200

-322

-99

-98

+74

+123

-123

+283

-640

+246

+481

+113

+174

-571

+160

+237

-557

+86

-381

-234

-333

CHANGE

1,940

1,445

1,555

2,602

1,561

1,566

1,517

1,619

1,471

2,112

1,472

1,406

1,461

1,499

1,631

1,662

1,555

1,753

1,262

1,556

1,571

1,223

1,219

801

1,164

1,271

1,006

1,431

1,214

1,321

1,276

INFLOW

 1,713

 1,772

 1,807

 1,789

 1,681

 1,621

 1,626

 1,586

 1,561

 1,590

 1,559

 1,552

 1,494

 1,533

 1,576

 1,583

 1,601

 1,592

 1,568

 1,418

 1,314

 1,150

 1,117

 1,073

 1,068

 1,138

 1,275

 1,295

 1,356

 1,426

 1,428

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 78

 33

 0

 0

OUTLET

 22

 20

 20

 12

 12

 14

 15

 14

 15

 17

 14

 16

 17

 15

 18

 17

 16

 18

 17

 14

 14

 16

 14

 16

 15

 14

 12

 15

 17

 13

 16

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2014 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 09/01/2014

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -628 46,142 45,862 0 111 485

ACRE-FEET -628 91,523 90,967 0 220 962

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 90,967

SPILL 0 91,187

 65,129

OUTLET 220

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,928

 1,463

 1,573

 2,566

 1,579

 1,561

 1,511

 1,618

 1,487

 2,095

 1,478

 1,409

 1,466

 1,498

 1,632

 1,663

 1,549

 1,742

 1,273

 1,549

 1,494

 1,208

 888

 583

 869

 927

 838

 1,413

 1,224

 1,323

 1,286

 44,693

 88,649

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 29, 2017

No. 04-17-00618-CV

Dina P. CISNEROS-BONNETTE,

Appellant

v.

Emcel P. BONNETTE, Jr.,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-11830

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporters’ records in this appeal were originally due on October 11, 2017. Ms. Mary 

Helen Vargas, one of the three court reporters in this case, filed her portion of the record on 

November 16, 2017. Ms. Letitia Moncivais, the second court reporter, filed a Notification of 

Late Record stating the reporter’s record had not been filed because appellant failed to pay or 

make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee. Shortly thereafter, Ms. Moncivais filed a letter 

stating she had been paid, and she filed her portion of the record. Therefore, Ms. Moncivais’s

request for additional time is moot.

On November 27, 2017, appellant filed proof of payment to the third court reporter, Ms. 

Kayleen Rivera. Ms. Rivera is hereby ORDERED to file her portion of the reporter’s record no 

later than December 29, 2017.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of November, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
§ 3904.20 Default. ( a ) The BLM will demand payment from the lease bond to cover nonpayment of any rental or royalty owed or the reclamation or exploration license bond for any reclamation obligations that are not met. The BLM will reduce the bond amount by the amount of the payment made to cover the default.
( b ) After any default, the BLM will provide notification of the amount required to restore the bond to the required level. A new bond or an increase in the existing bond to its pre-default level must be provided to the proper BLM office within 6 months of the BLM's written notification that the bond is below its required level. The BLM may accept separate or substitute bonds for each exploration license or lease. The BLM may take action to cancel the lease or exploration license covered by the bond if sufficient additional bond is not provided within the six month time period.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, B.K. Gogia, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of InferX Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) [this paragraph has been omitted]          (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:June 13, 2007         By:      /s/ B.K. Gogia                  B.K. Gogia           Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated May 18, 2004, and published in the Federal Register 
on June 3, 2004, (69 FR 31412-31413), Abbott Laboratories, DBA Knoll 
Pharmaceutical Company, 30 North Jefferson Road, Whippany, New Jersey 
07981, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dihydromorphine (9145).....................  I
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture bulk product and finished dosage 
units for distribution to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Abbott Laboratories to manufacture the listed basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Abbott Laboratories to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 
21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed.

William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-21952 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### Frank Herbert GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-60065.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 27, 2006.

Logan E. Johnson, Vinson & Elkins, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ann Cruce Roberts, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lubbock, TX, Caryl G. Thompson, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service District Directors Office, New Orleans, LA, Sharon A. Hudson, U.S. Citizenship *&*Immigration Services, Houston, TX, for Respondent.

Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Frank Herbert Gonzalez petitions for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which denied his application for asylum, withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), and relief under the Convention Against Torture. Gonzalez argues that he has demonstrated past persecution and a well-founded fear of future persecution based on his real or imputed political opinion. Therefore, he contends that the BIA erred by determining that he was ineligible for asylum.

*378This court will uphold the BIA’s finding that an alien is not eligible for asylum if that finding is supported by substantial evidence. *Girma v. INS,*283 F.3d 664, 666 (5th Cir.2002). Under this standard, the BIA’s determination will be affirmed “unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion.” *Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS,*78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir.1996).

The BIA determined that Gonzalez had not shown that threats from members of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), a Colombian guerilla group, were based on Gonzalez’s actual or imputed political opinion. Although Gonzalez asserts that FARC persecuted him due to his political opinion, he did not testify that the FARC members who threatened him in 1979,1998,1999, or 2000 knew that he was a member of the Liberal Party. Furthermore, he acknowledged that FARC threatened him in 2000 because he reported its plan to steal gas canisters and use them as bombs. Gonzalez has not shown that the evidence compels a conclusion contrary to that of the BIA. *See Carbajal-Gonzalez,*78 F.3d at 197.

Gonzalez has not briefed the BIA’s denial of his requests for withholding of removal or for relief under the CAT. Therefore, he has waived these claims. *See Rodriguez v. INS,*9 F.3d 408, 414 n. 15 (5th Cir.1993).

Accordingly, Gonzalez’s petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
§ 3910.42 Limitations on exploration licenses. ( a ) The issuance of an exploration license for an area will not preclude the BLM's approval of an exploration license or issuance of a Federal oil shale lease for the same lands.
( b ) If an oil shale lease is issued for an area covered by an exploration license, the BLM will terminate the exploration license on the effective date of the lease for those lands that are common to both.
#### Truman McDOWELL, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15291.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

May 28, 1955.

Truman McDowell, Jr., pro se.

F. E. Van Alstine, U. S. Atty., Sioux City, Iowa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed, etc., on motion of appellee.
#### § 3861.6 Plats and notices.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0060 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-194-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 2012-0168/B

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe NASA controls-structures interaction technology programThe interaction between a flexible spacecraft structure and its control system is commonly referred to as controls-structures interaction (CSI). The CSI technology program is developing the capability and confidence to integrate the structure and control system, so as to avoid interactions that cause problems and to exploit interactions to increase spacecraft capability. A NASA program has been initiated to advance CSI technology to a point where it can be used in spacecraft design for future missions. The CSI technology program is a multicenter program utilizing the resources of the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC), the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), and the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). The purpose is to describe the current activities, results to date, and future activities of the NASA CSI technology program.Document ID19910006744Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsNewsom, Jerry R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Layman, W. E.*(California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena., United States)*Waites, H. B.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL., United States)*Hayduk, R. J.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102752IAF-90-290NASA-TM-102752Meeting InformationMeeting: Congress of the International Astronautical FederationLocation: DresdenCountry: German Democratic RepublicStart Date: October 6, 1990End Date: October 12, 1990Accession Number91N16057Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 590-14-41-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006744.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe BL LAC phenomenon: X-ray observations of transition objects and determination of the x-ray spectrum of a complete sample of flat-spectrum radio sourcesThis report summarizes the activities related to two ROSAT investigations: (1) x-ray properties of radio galaxies thought to contain BL Lac type nuclei; and (2) x-ray spectra of a complete sample of flat-spectrum radio sources. The following papers describing the research are provided as attachments: Multiple X-ray Emission Components in Low Power Radio Galaxies; New X-ray Results on Radio Galaxies; Analysis Techniques for a Multiwavelength Study of Radio Galaxies; Separation of X-ray Emission Components in Radio Galaxies; X-ray Emission in Powerful Radio Galaxies and Quasars; Extended and Compact X-ray Emission in Powerful Radio Galaxies; and X-ray Spectra of a Complete Sample of Extragalactic Core-dominated Radio Sources.Document ID19940032181Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWorrall, Diana M.*(Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1994Subject CategoryAstronomyReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-195951NAS 1.26:195951Accession Number94N36688Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-1724CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-1882Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19940032181.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 173

 188

 207

 220

 217

 209

 214

 198

 210

 222

 212

 206

 210

 208

 207

 206

 206

 209

 207

 208

 216

 215

 230

 234

 228

 227

 224

 229

 229

 233

 163

 168

 183

 189

 189

 193

 183

 189

 193

 193

 199

 195

 195

 185

 197

 197

 197

 197

 191

 193

 197

 200

 202

 205

 205

 210

 207

 200

 220

 222

 166

 176

 191

 199

 203

 200

 200

 193

 199

 208

 205

 200

 204

 200

 202

 202

 203

 202

 200

 201

 202

 205

 209

 216

 215

 216

 217

 220

 224

 225

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### § 3503.40 Where do I file my permit or lease application and other necessary documents?

File your application in the State Office which manages the lands for which you are applying, unless we have designated a different State Office. For purposes of this part, a document is filed when it is received in the proper office.