alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5302. Congressional declaration of policy

#### (a) Recognition of obligation of United States

The Congress hereby recognizes the obligation of the United States to respond to the strong expression of the Indian people for self-determination by assuring maximum Indian participation in the direction of educational as well as other Federal services to Indian communities so as to render such services more responsive to the needs and desires of those communities.

#### (b) Declaration of commitment

The Congress declares its commitment to the maintenance of the Federal Government's unique and continuing relationship with, and responsibility to, individual Indian tribes and to the Indian people as a whole through the establishment of a meaningful Indian self-determination policy which will permit an orderly transition from the Federal domination of programs for, and services to, Indians to effective and meaningful participation by the Indian people in the planning, conduct, and administration of those programs and services. In accordance with this policy, the United States is committed to supporting and assisting Indian tribes in the development of strong and stable tribal governments, capable of administering quality programs and developing the economies of their respective communities.

#### (c) Declaration of national goal

The Congress declares that a major national goal of the United States is to provide the quantity and quality of educational services and opportunities which will permit Indian children to compete and excel in the life areas of their choice, and to achieve the measure of self-determination essential to their social and economic well-being.

(Pub. L. 93–638, §3, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203; Pub. L. 100–472, title I, §102, Oct. 5, 1988, 102 Stat. 2285.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 450a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–472 added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: "The Congress declares its commitment to the maintenance of the Federal Government's unique and continuing relationship with and responsibility to the Indian people through the establishment of a meaningful Indian self-determination policy which will permit an orderly transition from Federal domination of programs for and services to Indians to effective and meaningful participation by the Indian people in the planning, conduct, and administration of those programs and services."
#### Cortillion Fabrics Corp., Appellant, *v.*National Safety Bank and Trust Company of New York, Respondent.

First Department,

March 29, 1949.

*86
      *Samuel Lawrence Brennglass*of counsel *(Theodore Carsons,*attorney), for appellant.

*David Samuelsohn*of counsel *(Frederick Katz*and *Isidore Sapir*with him on the brief; *Frederick Katz,*attorney), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

On a motion addressed to its sufficiency, a pleading is entitled to liberality in interpretation. The allegation in plaintiff’s complaint to the effect that defendant *“*wrongfully, and in violation of, and contrary to the stop-payment notice given the defendant by the plaintiff as aforesaid, paid said check from plaintiff’s moneys on deposit with it ” is broad enough to include a charge that defendant willfully or wantonly paid the check contrary to plaintiff’s specific instructions. A triable issue is thus raised as to whether the check was paid by the bank in willful disregard of the stop-payment order. Though the Appellate Term correctly ruled that plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment in its favor, it should not have directed summary judgment for defendant.

The determination of the Appellate Term insofar as it grants defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment should be reversed and the motion denied, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dobe, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Determination of the Appellate Term, insofar as it grants defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed and the motion denied, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Settle order on notice.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Finance Docket No. 34546] 

Western Rail Switching, Incorporated (WRS), a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to operate, pursuant to an agreement with the county of Spokane, WA (the County), 4.93 miles of a line of railroad known as the Geiger Spur. The line extends from a point of connection with The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company's (BNSF) line at milepost 0.00 near Fairchild Air Force Base (also known as milepost 1493.95 on BNSF's Columbia River Subdivision) to milepost 4.93 on the Geiger Spur line near Airway Heights, in Spokane County, WA. 

The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or after September 10, 2004. 

                    This transaction is related to STB Finance Docket No. 34541,                     *Spokane County—Acquisition Exemption—The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company,*                     wherein the County has filed a verified notice of exemption for its acquisition of the 4.93-mile line of railroad from BNSF.                 

                    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void                     *ab initio.*                     Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.                 

An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 34546, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on Thomas F. McFarland, P.C., 208 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1890, Chicago, IL 60604-1112. 

                    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web-site at                     *“http://www.stb.dot.gov.”*

Decided: September 24, 2004. 

By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings. 

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-22092 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Detail

# Economic and Structural Relationships in U.S. Hog Production

Agricultural Economic Report No. (AER-818) 64 pp, February 2003

by William D McBride and Nigel  Key

Rapid change in the size and ownership structure of U.S. hog production has created new and varied challenges for the industry. This report describes an industry becoming increasingly concentrated among fewer and larger farms, and becoming more economically efficient. These changes have not come without problems. The increasing market control and power concentrated among packers and large hog operations, and the manure management problem posed by an increasing concentration of hog manure on fewer operations, are paramount concerns. Addressing these concerns through regulations would likely impose economic costs that could be passed on to consumers. In addition, the relative mobility of the hog industry means that regulations could result in significant changes in the location of hog production facilities, with ripple effects in local economies. Balancing environmental and economic interests will challenge policymakers dealing with the implications of structural change in U.S. hog production.

**Keywords:** agricultural economics, Hog production, industry structure, structural change, production costs, contract production, manure management, ARMS, ERS, USDA

**In this publication...**

-  Entire Report 
-  Abstract, Acknowledgments 
-  Contents 
-  Executive Summary 
-  Introduction 
-  Background 
-  Factors Contributing to Structural Change 
-  Implications of Structural Change 
-  Glossary 
-  References 
-  Appendix I: Measuring Hog Production Costs 
-  Appendix II: Modeling the Impact of Contract Production on Productivity 
-  Appendix III: Modeling the Returns to Contract Production 

-  Hogs & Pork 

**Last updated:** Saturday, February 01, 2003

**For more information contact:**William D McBride and Nigel  Key
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:The attached files are the following docket-related documents:
?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Notice of proposed rulemaking supersedure
?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Notice of proposed rulemaking supersedure grid
?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Final rule supersedure
?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Final rule supersedure grid
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,285.81

 2,285.59

 2,285.36

 2,285.15

 2,284.91

 2,284.67

 2,284.42

 2,284.19

 2,283.89

 2,283.66

 2,283.43

 2,283.22

 2,282.94

 2,282.71

 2,282.47

 2,282.21

 2,281.97

 2,281.73

 2,281.47

 2,281.23

 2,280.97

 2,280.72

 2,280.47

 2,280.21

 2,279.93

 2,279.69

 2,279.36

 2,279.10

 2,278.84

 2,278.56

 2,278.29

 1,301.2

 1,298.8

 1,296.3

 1,294.0

 1,291.4

 1,288.9

 1,286.2

 1,283.7

 1,280.5

 1,278.0

 1,275.6

 1,273.4

 1,270.4

 1,267.9

 1,265.4

 1,262.6

 1,260.1

 1,257.6

 1,254.8

 1,252.3

 1,249.6

 1,247.0

 1,244.4

 1,241.6

 1,238.7

 1,236.2

 1,232.8

 1,230.1

 1,227.4

 1,224.5

 1,221.8

STORAGE

-2.1

-2.4

-2.5

-2.3

-2.6

-2.6

-2.7

-2.5

-3.2

-2.5

-2.5

-2.2

-3.0

-2.4

-2.5

-2.8

-2.5

-2.5

-2.7

-2.5

-2.7

-2.6

-2.6

-2.7

-2.9

-2.5

-3.4

-2.7

-2.7

-2.9

-2.8

CHANGE

359

197

97

275

206

123

55

170

-75

184

139

161

150

130

105

135

138

106

160

144

108

162

98

123

9

162

-24

53

122

83

133

INFLOW

 1,360

 1,359

 1,303

 1,369

 1,463

 1,372

 1,371

 1,387

 1,507

 1,371

 1,332

 1,262

 1,615

 1,336

 1,347

 1,470

 1,394

 1,347

 1,501

 1,385

 1,460

 1,444

 1,383

 1,458

 1,450

 1,390

 1,668

 1,373

 1,455

 1,515

 1,515

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 35

 38

 48

 51

 48

 51

 38

 28

 38

 50

 44

 28

 38

 22

 40

 53

 25

 31

 37

 31

 25

 34

 31

 34

 31

 27

 34

 40

 21

 24

 21

C.F.S.

 .11

 .12

 .15

 .16

 .15

 .16

 .12

 .09

 .12

 .16

 .14

 .09

 .12

 .07

 .13

 .17

 .08

 .10

 .12

 .10

 .08

 .11

 .10

 .11

 .10

 .09

 .11

 .13

 .07

 .08

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2013 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 19, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -81.5 3,988 43,962 0 0 1,096 3.51 .11

ACRE-FEET -81,500 7,910 87,199 0 0 2,174

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 87,199

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 87,199

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .11

JULY 1, 2013 1.29

 1,303.2

Table 4

(1) (1)
#### Sarah A. Wheeler, Appellant, v. Woodside Residences, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 346

 320

 339

 370

 414

 439

 456

 481

 513

 510

 505

 495

 479

 488

 494

 502

 498

 485

 484

 486

 491

 495

 497

 496

 495

 509

 510

 505

 509

 507

 322

 292

 312

 340

 372

 417

 440

 456

 476

 496

 497

 472

 469

 475

 483

 494

 485

 478

 479

 476

 486

 488

 494

 490

 489

 495

 501

 500

 504

 498

 338

 302

 330

 356

 395

 433

 447

 468

 496

 501

 501

 489

 473

 482

 488

 498

 494

 483

 482

 481

 489

 492

 496

 494

 492

 503

 505

 502

 507

 502

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 8,444

 8,589

 8,701

 8,792

 8,894

 9,001

 9,087

 9,160

 9,252

 9,389

 9,586

 9,761

 9,879

 9,984

 10,087

 10,229

 10,457

 10,743

 11,014

 11,245

 11,516

 11,785

 12,051

 12,343

 12,648

 12,964

 13,274

 13,540

 13,752

 13,919

 281

 286

 290

 293

 296

 300

 303

 305

 308

 313

 320

 325

 329

 333

 336

 341

 349

 358

 367

 375

 384

 393

 402

 411

 422

 432

 442

 451

 458

 464

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
May 27, 2015 

 

Mr. Matt Sersion 

835 Maine Ave. 

Long Beach, CA 90813 

Dear Mr. Sersion: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 16, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1049), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
#### § 30.219 Who pays for the costs of taking a deposition?

The party who requests the taking of a deposition must make arrangements for payment of any costs incurred. The judge may assign the costs in the order.
§ 28.3 Emergency assistance. In the absence of a reciprocal fire protection agreement, each agency head may provide emergency fire protection will not jeopardize the property of the United States by making it impossible for the agency head to protect the property of the United States and such assistance is determined to be in the best interest of the United States. The providing of emergency assistance shall not be in the best interest of the United States and may not be granted by an agency head if: ( a ) Persons other than those currently employed by the agency at the time of the emergency and trained in the type of emergency assistance being provided would be used in the providing of the emergency assistance.
( b ) Assistance is provided to a place more than an hour's travel from where the agency maintains fire protection facilities. Assistance which requires more than an hour's travel may be given for those fire emergencies threatening to last more than 12 hours, or endangering human life.
§ 2.56 May the bureau waive or reduce your fees at its discretion? ( a ) The bureau may waive or reduce fees at its discretion if a request involves furnishing: ( 1 ) A copy of a record that the bureau has reproduced for free distribution;
( 2 ) One copy of a personal document (for example, a birth certificate) to a person who has been required to furnish it for retention by the Department;
( 3 ) One copy of the transcript of a hearing before a hearing officer in a grievance or similar proceeding to the employee for whom the hearing was held;
( 4 ) Records to donors with respect to their gifts;
( 5 ) Records to individuals or private nonprofit organizations having an official, voluntary, or cooperative relationship with the Department if it will assist their work with the Department;
( 6 ) A reasonable number of records to members of the U.S. Congress; state, local, and foreign governments; public international organizations; or Indian tribes, when to do so is an appropriate courtesy, or when the recipient is carrying on a function related to a Departmental function and the waiver will help accomplish the Department's work;
( 7 ) Records in conformance with generally established business custom (for example, furnishing personal reference data to prospective employers of current or former Department employees); or
( 8 ) One copy of a single record to assist you in obtaining financial benefits to which you may be entitled (for example, veterans or their dependents, employees with Government employee compensation claims).
( b ) You cannot appeal the denial of a discretionary fee waiver or reduction.
### §592. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 8, 1940, ch. 285, §2, 54 Stat. 254, which related to withdrawal of Minnesota Chippewa tribal funds to reimburse the United States for land and timber, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 32.2 Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries Certification Of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Broadcast International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Reed L. Benson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 14, 2007  /s/ Reed L. Benson Reed L. Benson Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1812.1-2 Inquiries.

No person other than officers or employees of the Department of the Interior shall direct any inquiry to any employee of the Bureau with respect to any matter pending before it other than to the head of the unit in which the matter is pending, to a superior officer, or to an employee of the unit authorized by the unit head to answer inquiries.

[35 FR 9513, June 13, 1970]
1

CVPIA Habitat Restoration Program ((b)(1) “other”) 

FY21 Expenditures

Project Proposed Activity Funding

Captive Propagation for 

Repatriation of Blunt-Nosed 

Leopard Lizards (BNLL) in 

the Panoche Hills

Fresno Chaffee Zoo

In 2020, the Fresno Zoo received a permit to 

collect the last 5 adult blunt-nosed leopard 

lizards (BNLL) from a population on the 

Panoche Plateau and initiated a captive 

breeding population. Those lizards are 

thriving and reproducing. The Zoo would 

construct a new Conservation Building to 

house the BNLL captive propagation 

program, aiming to maintain a colony of 20 

breeding pairs. Progeny will be repatriated 

to the BLM-owned Panoche Plateau to 

reestablish the population.

*$520,546

The remainder of the project 

funds are from the CVPCP 

using $248,749 of prior year 

funds

Boeger Tract Riparian 

Habitat Restoration

The Nature Conservancy

The goals of the project are to: (1) complete 

project modeling and permitting; (2) replace 

51 acres of flood-prone agricultural land 

with native riparian habitat; and (3) use 

acoustic monitoring to collect baseline data 

on riparian songbird species.

**$41,406

Additional funds added to the 

2020 grant agreement to 

cover increased costs for goal 

(1)

Young Ranch Serpentine 

Habitat Acquisition on 

Coyote Ridge

Santa Clara Valley Habitat 

Agency

Acquisition of six parcels totaling 2,150 acres 

which include 670 acres of serpentine 

grassland habitat supporting bay 

checkerspot butterfly (entire property 

designated as critical habitat), Metcalf 

Canyon jewelflower, and Santa Clara Valley 

dudleya. CA tiger salamander and CA redlegged frog are present in ponds on the 

property.

**$600,000

The remainder of the 

$1,000,000 grant to be 

awarded in 

FY 2022

FY 2021 Allocation 

$1,500,000

USFWS

BOR

$750,000

$750,000

Project Costs 

Total: $1,161,952

USFWS

BOR

$520,546 

$641,406

Program Operations and 

Administrative Costs 

Total: $3,380,048

USFWS

BOR

$229,454

$108,594

*USFWS-funded | **BOR-funded
§ 3133.3 Under what circumstances will BLM waive, suspend, or reduce the rental, royalty, or minimum royalty on my NPR-A lease? ( a ) BLM will waive, suspend, or reduce the rental or minimum royalty or reduce the royalty rate on your lease if BLM finds that— ( 1 ) It encourages the greatest ultimate recovery of oil or gas or it is in the interest of conservation; and
( 2 ) It is necessary to promote development or the BLM determines the lease cannot be successfully operated under the terms of the lease.
( b ) The BLM will consult with the State of Alaska and the North Slope Borough within 10 days of receiving an application for waiver, suspension, or reduction of rental or minimum royalty, or reduction of the royalty rate and will not approve an application under § 3133.4 of this subpart until at least 30 days after the consultation.
( c ) If your lease includes land that was made available for acquisition by a regional corporation (as defined in 43 U.S.C. 1602) under the provision of Section 1431(o) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3101 *et seq.*), the BLM will only approve a waiver, suspension, or reduction of rental or minimum royalty, or reduction of the royalty rate if the regional corporation concurs.
[67 FR 17885, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 73 FR 6442, Feb. 4, 2008]