alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R ONNIE S. M AR TIN, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. M ORRIS, Dr., Individually ; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-56672 D.C . No. 2:10-c v-05232-PSG-PJW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Philip S. Gutierre z , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. R onnie S. M a

rtin, a C a lifornia

sta te prisone r, a

ppe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging a n Eighth Am e ndm e nt c la im

c ha lle nging the c onditions of his c onfine m e nt. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo c ross-m otions for 

# FIL ED DEC 3 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).sum

m ary judgm e nt. Ford v . C

ity of Yak ima , 706 F.3d 1188, 1192 (9th C ir. 2013). W e m ay a ffirm on a ny ba s is supporte d by

the re c ord, Gordon v . Virtumundo, Inc . , 575 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th C ir. 2009), a nd we a ffirm . Sum m a ry judgm e nt for de fe n da

nts wa s prope r be c a

use M artin fa i le d to ra ise a ge n uine dispute of m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda nts we re de libe rate ly indiffe re nt in re fusing to pre sc ribe spe c ia l soa p a nd lotion. Se eFarme r v . Bre nnan , 511 U.S. 825, 832, 837 (1994) (a prison offic i a l is not lia

ble unde r the Eighth Am e ndm e nt for depriving a n inm ate “ hum ane c onditions of c onfine m e nt” unle ss he or she “ knows of a

nd disre ga

rds a n e xc e ssive risk to inmate he a lth” ). W e re je c t M a rtin’ s c o nte ntion tha

t the distric t c o urt should ha ve stric ke n B arne tt’ s De c la

ration. M artin’ s m otion to e xpa

nd the re c ord on a

p pe a l a nd re que s t for judic ia l notic e , file d on Oc tobe r 3, 2013, a re de nie d a s unne c e ssa

ry . W e do not c onside r argum e nts ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se e Padge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 5 6 6 7 2 2
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EDUARDO FRANCISCO CHIRINOS GUERRERO,

Appellant,

v.

ERIKA MARIA BRAIN BEDOYA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-43

[June 7, 2018]

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Nicholas Richard Lopane, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. FMCE 17-008619.

Nancy A. Hass of Nancy A. Hass, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Kevin Coyle Colbert, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 2742.2 Qualifications of applicants.

States and their political subdivisions are qualified applicants.
### NUMBER 13

- 14

- 00 052

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E ROBERT MICHELENA

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and Motion for Temporary Relief

.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Perkes

Per Curiam Order

Relator, Robert Michelena, fi led a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for

temporary relief in th e above cause on January 23, 2014. The Court, having examined

and fully considered the motion for temporar y relief , is of the opinion that it should be

CARRIED WITH THE CASE pending further order of this Court

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective

until the case is finally decided.”). T he Court requests that Monica Michelena, the real

party in interest, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in the offices of the2

Court on or before the expiration of the business day on January 31, 2014. See id. R.

52.4, 52.8.

IT IS SO ORDER ED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

24th day of January , 2014

.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED N IDIA CRUZ , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 23

- 110 LT Case No. 2022

- DR

- 249 STEPHANIE EILEEN AN DREJKO ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed February 7 , 2 023 Non f inal A ppeal f rom the Circuit Court for Nassau County , Eric C. R oberson , J udge. Nidia Cruz, Callahan, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

P ER CURIAM. A FFIRMED.

EVANDER , SOUD and MACIVER , JJ., concur.
!

!

CCOOLLUUSSAA CC OO

T17N R1W

T16N R1W

5 4 6

0

32 33

29 28

31

30

3

20 21 19

8 9 7 10

98.6 L

95.85 L

" Contract No. 14-06-200-2993A-R-1

Exhibit B

Nene Ranch, LLC

725-202-72

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Contractor's Service Area

! Point of Diversion

Date: May 11, 2005

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\nene_ranch_llc\nene_ranch_llc.mxd
Sacramento

River

YYOOLL OO CC OO

SSAACCRRAA MMEE NNTTOO CCOO

T10N R3E

T9N R4E

T10N R4E

T9N R3E

0

1

3

6

36

7

35

26 25

31

4

30

33

2

12

10 9

Vin

Kiesel

Fremont

10.75 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-2065A-R-1

Exhibit B

Siddiqui, Javed and Amna

725-202-126

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 22, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\siddiqui_javed_and_amna_2065\siddiqui_javed_and_amna.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe L sub 1 finite element method for pure convection problemsThe least squares (L sub 2) finite element method is introduced for 2-D steady state pure convection problems with smooth solutions. It is proven that the L sub 2 method has the same stability estimate as the original equation, i.e., the L sub 2 method has better control of the streamline derivative. Numerical convergence rates are given to show that the L sub 2 method is almost optimal. This L sub 2 method was then used as a framework to develop an iteratively reweighted L sub 2 finite element method to obtain a least absolute residual (L sub 1) solution for problems with discontinuous solutions. This L sub 1 finite element method produces a nonoscillatory, nondiffusive and highly accurate numerical solution that has a sharp discontinuity in one element on both coarse and fine meshes. A robust reweighting strategy was also devised to obtain the L sub 1 solution in a few iterations. A number of examples solved by using triangle and bilinear elements are presented.Document ID19910015503Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJiang, Bo-Nan*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1991Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103773ICOMP-91-03NAS 1.15:103773E-6039Accession Number91N24817Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASA ORDER C-99066-GDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910015503.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §125. Expenditure of moneys of tribes of Quapaw Agency

No moneys shall be expended from tribal or individual funds belonging to the Quapaw or other tribes of Indians of the Quapaw Agency in the State of Oklahoma without specific authority of law.

(June 30, 1919, ch. 4, §17, 41 Stat. 20.)
### §396a. Leases of unallotted lands for mining purposes; duration of leases

On and after May 11, 1938, unallotted lands within any Indian reservation or lands owned by any tribe, group, or band of Indians under Federal jurisdiction, except those specifically excepted from the provisions of sections 396a to 396g of this title, may, with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, be leased for mining purposes, by authority of the tribal council or other authorized spokesmen for such Indians, for terms not to exceed ten years and as long thereafter as minerals are produced in paying quantities.

(May 11, 1938, ch. 198, §1, 52 Stat. 347.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal of Inconsistent Acts

Act May 11, 1938, ch. 198, §7, 52 Stat. 348, provided that: "All Act [Acts] or parts of Acts inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed."
§ 3261.20 How will BLM review applications submitted under this subpart and notify me of its decision? ( a ) When we receive your operations plan, we will make sure it is complete and review it for compliance with the requirements of § 3200.4.
( b ) If another Federal agency manages the surface of your lease, we will consult with it before we approve your drilling permit.
( c ) We will review your drilling permit and drilling program or your Sundry Notice for well pad construction, to make sure they conform with your operations plan and any mitigation measures we developed while reviewing your plan.
( d ) We will check your drilling permit and drilling program for technical adequacy and may require additional information.
( e ) We will check your drilling permit for compliance with the requirements of § 3200.4.
( f ) If we need any further information to complete our review, we will contact you in writing and suspend our review until we receive the information.
( g ) After our review, we will notify you as to whether your permit has been approved or denied, as well as any conditions of approval.
CVPCP FY12 Projects, 6/28/2016

Project Proposed Activity Funding

F-3

Stubblefield Ranch 

Acquisition Project

BLM, Bakersfield

Fee title acquisition of a 1,614-acre 

property located at the southeastern 

end of the Carrizo Plain National 

Monument in Kern and San Luis Obispo 

counties. Species to benefit include 

San Joaquin kit fox, giant kangaroo rat, 

blunt-nosed leopard lizard, California 

jewelflower, Kern primrose sphinx moth, 

and California condor. Kern and San 

Luis Obispo Counties

$971,030

(Note: the 

CVPCP initially 

provided 

$574,567 in 

2012; then 

$96,463 of endof-year (EOY) 

funds were 

provided in 2012; 

then $300,000 of 

EOY funds were 

provided in 2013 

for a total of 

$971,030 for the 

CVPCP. The 

HRP provided 

$108,970. Total 

for CVPCP and 

HRP Is 

$1,080,000.) 

R-2

Restoration of Riparian 

Habitat at Dos Rios Ranch

River Partners

Restore/enhance riparian and wetland 

habitats and conduct avian monitoring 

on 198 acres of floodplain to benefit 

endangered riparian mammals, birds, 

and other wildlife. Stanislaus County

$575,456

C-1

Captive Propagation and 

Reintroduction of Largeflowered Fiddleneck in 

Contra Costa and San 

Joaquin Counties

Vollmar Natural Lands 

Consulting

Use of seed collection and propagation 

to establish new self-perpetuating 

populations of the large-flowered 

fiddleneck on suitable sites within its 

known historic range. Contra Costa 

and San Joaquin Counties.

$198,381

S-7

Research Facilitating 

Recovery of the 

Endangered Serpentine 

Endemic Tiburon Paintbrush 

The project would (1) test whether 

seeding or outplanting with potential 

parasitic hosts would facilitate recovery 

of the species, and (2) determine 

genetic distinctness of populations to 

$93,130
Project Proposed Activity Funding

at Coyote Ridge in S. Santa 

Clara Co

Creekside Center for Earth 

Observation

inform enhancement and future 

introduction. Santa Clara County

C-3

Reintroduction of the 

Metcalf Canyon Jewelflower 

at Tulare Hill in Southern 

Santa Clara County

Santa Clara University

The main objective is to reintroduce the 

Metcalf Canyon jewelflower at three 

sites on Tulare Hill, and supplement an 

existing population at Motorcycle 

County Park in Santa Clara County. 

Species to benefit is the Metcalf 

Canyon jewelflower.

$115,737

(Note: the HRP 

is providing 

$157,231. Total: 

$272,968)

O-2

Create and Pilot a Merced 

Vernal Pool Education 

Program at the Elementary 

School Level

Carol Witham, Sole 

Proprietor

The project will create an outdoor 

education program in Merced County 

based on the Sacramento Splash 

curriculum, to be piloted in six Merced 

County classrooms. Species to 

potentially benefit include succulent 

owl’s clover, Colusa grass, San Joaquin 

Valley orcutt grass, Greene’s tuctoria, 

California tiger salamander, and vernal 

pool fairy shrimp. Merced County

$25,000

Program Allocation $1,638,000

Deobligations from Prior 

Projects

$272,487

End-of-Year Funds (2012 

and 2013)

$396,463

Project Costs Totals $1,582,271
§ 3515.16 What standards does BLM use to assess the public interest of an exchange? BLM must find that the exchange is in the public interest under the following criteria: ( a ) The benefits of production from your existing lease or preference right to a lease would not outweigh the adverse effects on, or threat of damage or destruction to: ( 1 ) Agricultural production potential;
( 2 ) Scenic values;
( 3 ) Biological values including threatened or endangered species habitat;
( 4 ) Geologic values;
( 5 ) Archeological, historic or other cultural values;
( 6 ) Other public interest values such as recreational use;
( 7 ) Residential or urban areas;
( 8 ) Potential inclusion in the wilderness or wild and scenic rivers systems; or
( 9 ) Other public uses, including public highways, airports, and rights-of-way from lease operations.
( b ) The lands proposed for exchange must be free from hazardous waste as defined under the authorities of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. 6901) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (42 U.S.C. 9601).
§ 3190.1 Proprietary data. With regard to any data or information obtained by a State, Indian tribe or individual, whether under a delegation of authority, cooperative agreement or contract, the following applies: ( a ) Proprietary data shall be made available to a State or Indian tribe pursuant to a cooperative agreement under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 1732 if such State or Indian tribe: ( 1 ) Consents in writing to restrict the dissemination of such information to such persons directly involved in an investigation under 30 U.S.C. 1732 who need the information to conduct the investigation;
( 2 ) Agrees in writing to accept liability for wrongful disclosure;
( 3 ) In the case of a State, the State demonstrates that such information is essential to the conduct of an investigation or to litigation under 30 U.S.C. 1734; and
( 4 ) In the case of an Indian tribe, the tribe demonstrates that such information is essential to the conduct of an audit or investigation and waives sovereign immunity by express consent for wrongful disclosure.
( b ) ( 1 ) Any person or State that obtains proprietary data pursuant to a delegation of authority, cooperative agreement or contract under this part is subject to the same provisions of law with respect to the disclosure of such information as would apply to any officer or employee of the United States.
( 2 ) Disclosure of proprietary data obtained pursuant to a delegation of authority, cooperative agreement, or contract under this part may not be compelled under State law.
### NUMBER 13 - 17 - 00572 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ROBERT MICHELENA , A ppellant ,
v. MONICA MICHELENA , Appellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Contreras and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez Appellant Robert Michelena attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered

o n September 15, 2017 by the judge of the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause no. 2012

- DCL

- 0482 . Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final , appealable order. On October 13, 2017, t he Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so2

that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction if he failed to correct the defect or show grounds for continuing the appeal
with in ten days from the date of this notice. Appellant has not responded t o the Court ’ s notice. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dism issed for want of jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See id. R. 42.3( a ),(c).

/s/ Rogelio Valdez ROGELIO VALDEZ Chief Justice
D elivered and filed the 14th day of December, 2017.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                                      11
<PAGE>



COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP


                            OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                   ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                 CWMBS, INC.
                   CHL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH TRUST 2001-11
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2001-11


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (a "Master Servicer"), which has assumed
all duties of master servicer from Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (also, a
"Master Servicer" and, together with Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, the
"Master Servicers") as of October 15, 2001, and do hereby further certify
pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicers during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicers
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, each Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
     throughout such year.




/s/ Thomas K. McLaughlin                             Dated: March 25, 2002

THOMAS K. MCLAUGHLIN
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



/s/ David A. Spector                                 Dated: March 25, 2002

DAVID A. SPECTOR
MANAGING DIRECTOR



                                      12
#### Amando D. CRUZ, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 2006-3193.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 27, 2006.

Amando D. Cruz, pro se.

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

The court treats the informal brief submitted by Amando D. Cruz as a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his petition for review for failure to file a brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The mandate is recalled, the dismissal order is vacated, and the petition for review is reinstated.

(2) The Office of Personnel Management’s brief is due within 40 days of the date of filing of this order.
**Attachment C: Generic Release Form for Focus Group Participants**

**Interview Release Form –**  **Insert Date & Time** By signing below I agree to participate in consumer research interviews conducted by Shugoll Research at the date and time specified above in return for the specified payment listed below. The research will be conducted at **[insert l ocation**  **].** By signing this agreement, I hereby assign all rights, title and interest to any ideas, concepts or other intellectual property discussed or generated in the interview to **[insert name of research company]**  . I understand that the interviews may be photographed or reco rded and may be shared with **[insert name of research company]** employees , clients and corporat e or business partners , and I give my consent to be photographed and recorded . I understand that I may be asked to try food or beverage products as part of the res earch. I have no food allergies that limit my consumption of these foods and/or beverages and assume all risks associated with their consumption . In return for my participation and agreement to the terms described above, I will receive **$XX.** AGREED AN D ACCEPTED BY:

_______________________________________ _____________________ (Signature) (Date)

_______________________________________ (Print Name)

_______________________________________ ______ _____________________ (Address)

______________________________ _________ ___________________________ (City) (State) (Zip code)
§ 3581.4-2 Rate of royalty; investment determined. If the authorized officer finds the application sufficient to authorize the issuance of a lease, he/she shall establish a rate of royalty of not less than 5 percent or more than 121 ⁄ 2 percent of the value of the output of gold, silver or quicksilver at the mine and also shall establish the amount of investment required under the lease.