Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 28, 2004 / Notices 57905

the fabric be piece dyed before it is 

printed.

CITA is soliciting public comments 

regarding this request, particularly with 

respect to whether this fabric can be 

supplied by the domestic industry in 

commercial quantities in a timely 

manner. Also relevant is whether other 

fabrics that are supplied by the domestic 

industry in commercial quantities in a 

timely manner are substitutable for the 

fabric for purposes of the intended use. 

Comments must be received no later 

than October 13, 2004. Interested 

persons are invited to submit six copies 

of such comments or information to the 

Chairman, Committee for the 

Implementation of Textile Agreements, 

room 3100, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.

If a comment alleges that this fabric 

can be supplied by the domestic 

industry in commercial quantities in a 

timely manner, CITA will closely 

review any supporting documentation, 

such as a signed statement by a 

manufacturer of the fabric stating that it 

produces the fabric that is the subject of 

the request, including the quantities that 

can be supplied and the time necessary 

to fill an order, as well as any relevant 

information regarding past production.

CITA will protect any business 

confidential information that is marked 

‘‘business confidential’’ from disclosure 

to the full extent permitted by law. 

CITA will make available to the public 

non-confidential versions of the request 

and non-confidential versions of any 

public comments received with respect 

to a request in room 3100 in the Herbert 

Hoover Building, 14th and Constitution 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230. 

Persons submitting comments on a 

request are encouraged to include a nonconfidential version and a nonconfidential summary.

James C. Leonard III,

Chairman, Committee for the Implementation 

of Textile Agreements.

[FR Doc.04–21751 Filed 9–24–04; 9:41 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S

COMMITTEE FOR THE 

IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE 

AGREEMENTS

Request for Public Comments on 

Commercial Availability Petition under 

the United States - Caribbean Basin 

Trade Partnership Act (CBTPA)

September 24, 2004.

AGENCY: Committee for the 

Implementation of Textile Agreements 

(CITA).

ACTION: Request for public comments 

concerning a petition for a 

determination that certain woven, 100 

percent cotton, double-napped flannel 

fabric cannot be supplied by the 

domestic industry in commercial 

quantities in a timely manner under the 

CBTPA.

SUMMARY: On September 23, 2004, the 

Chairman of CITA received a petition 

from Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., 

on behalf of Picacho, S.A., alleging that 

certain woven, 100 percent cotton, 

double-napped flannel fabric, of the 

specifications detailed below, classified 

in subheading 5209.31.60.50 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS), cannot be 

supplied by the domestic industry in 

commercial quantities in a timely 

manner. The petition requests that 

shirts, trousers, nightwear, robes, 

dressing gowns and woven underwear 

of such fabrics assembled in one or 

more CBTPA beneficiary countries be 

eligible for preferential treatment under 

the CBTPA. CITA hereby solicits public 

comments on this petition, in particular 

with regard to whether these fabrics can 

be supplied by the domestic industry in 

commercial quantities in a timely 

manner. Comments must be submitted 

by October 13, 2004 to the Chairman, 

Committee for the Implementation of 

Textile Agreements, Room 3001, United 

States Department of Commerce, 14th 

and Constitution, N.W., Washington, 

D.C. 20230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janet E. Heinzen, International Trade 

Specialist, Office of Textiles and 

Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

(202) 482-3400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority: Section 213(b)(2)(A)(v)(II) of the 

CBERA, as added by Section 211(a) of the 

CBTPA; Section 6 of Executive Order No. 

13191 of January 17, 2001.

Background:

The CBTPA provides for quota- and 

duty-free treatment for qualifying textile 

and apparel products. Such treatment is 

generally limited to products 

manufactured from yarns or fabrics 

formed in the United States. The CBTPA 

also provides for quota- and duty-free 

treatment for apparel articles that are 

both cut (or knit-to-shape) and sewn or 

otherwise assembled in one or more 

CBTPA beneficiary countries from fabric 

or yarn that is not formed in the United 

States, if it has been determined that 

such fabric or yarn cannot be supplied 

by the domestic industry in commercial 

quantities in a timely manner. In 

Executive Order No. 13191, the 

President delegated to CITA the 

authority to determine whether yarns or 

fabrics cannot be supplied by the 

domestic industry in commercial 

quantities in a timely manner under the 

CBTPA and directed CITA to establish 

procedures to ensure appropriate public 

participation in any such determination. 

On March 6, 2001, CITA published 

procedures that it will follow in 

considering requests. (66 FR 13502).

On September 23, 2004, the Chairman 

of CITA received a petition on behalf of 

Picacho, S.A., alleging that certain 

woven, 100 percent cotton, doublenapped flannel fabric, of the 

specifications detailed below, classified 

HTSUS subheading 5209.31.60.50, 

cannot be supplied by the domestic 

industry in commercial quantities in a 

timely manner and requesting quotaand duty-free treatment under the 

CBTPA for certain apparel articles that 

are cut and sewn in one or more CBTPA 

beneficiary countries from such fabrics.

Specifications:

Petitioner Style No: 2897A

Fiber Content: 100% Cotton

Weight: 203 g/m2

Width: 150 centimeters

Thread Count: 21 warp ends per centimeter; 

18 filling picks per centimeter; total: 39 threads per 

square centimeter

Yarn Number: Warp: 40.6 metric, ring spun; 

filling: 13.54 metric, open 

end spun; overall average 

yarn number: 19.2 metric

Finish: (Piece) dyed; napped on both 

sides, sanforized

The petitioner emphasizes that the 

fabrics must be napped on both sides, 

that the yarn sizes and thread count, 

and consequently, the weight of the 

fabrics must be as nearly exact as 

possible as sepcified. The warp yarns 

must be ring spun and the filling yarns 

must be open end spun.

CITA is soliciting public comments 

regarding this request, particularly with 

respect to whether these fabrics can be 

supplied by the domestic industry in 

commercial quantities in a timely 

manner. Also relevant is whether other 

fabrics that are supplied by the domestic 

industry in commercial quantities in a 

timely manner are substitutable for the 

fabric for purposes of the intended use. 

Comments must be received no later 

than October 13, 2004. Interested 

persons are invited to submit six copies 

of such comments or information to the 

Chairman, Committee for the 

Implementation of Textile Agreements, 

room 3100, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th and Constitution 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230.

If a comment alleges that these fabrics 

can be supplied by the domestic 

industry in commercial quantities in a 

timely manner, CITA will closely 

57906 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 28, 2004 / Notices 

review any supporting documentation, 

such as a signed statement by a 

manufacturer of the fabric stating that it 

produces the fabric that is the subject of 

the request, including the quantities that 

can be supplied and the time necessary 

to fill an order, as well as any relevant 

information regarding past production.

CITA will protect any business 

confidential information that is marked 

‘‘business confidential’’ from disclosure 

to the full extent permitted by law. 

CITA will make available to the public 

non-confidential versions of the request 

and non-confidential versions of any 

public comments received with respect 

to a request in room 3100 in the Herbert 

Hoover Building, 14th and Constitution 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230. 

Persons submitting comments on a 

request are encouraged to include a nonconfidential version and a nonconfidential summary.

James C. Leonard III,

Chairman, Committee for the Implementation 

of Textile Agreements.

[FR Doc.04–21826 Filed 9–24–04; 2:09 pm]

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. OR04–3–000] 

America West Airlines, Inc., Southwest 

Airlines Co., Northwest Airlines, Inc., 

and Continental Airlines, Inc., 

Complainants v. SFPP, L.P., 

Respondent; Notice of Complaint 

Requesting Fast Track Processing 

September 22, 2004. 

Take notice that on September 21, 

2004, America West Airlines, Inc. 

(‘‘America West’’), Southwest Airlines 

Co. (‘‘Southwest Airlines’’), Northwest 

Airlines, Inc., (‘‘Northwest Airlines’’) 

and Continental Airlines, Inc., 

(‘‘Continental Airlines’’) (collectively, 

‘‘Airline Complainants’’) filed a 

complaint against SFPP, L.P. (SFPP) 

pursuant to Rule 206 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.206) and the 

Procedural Rules Applicable to Oil 

Pipline Proceedings (18 CFR 343.1(A)). 

Airline Complainants state that SFPP 

has violated and continues to violate the 

Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. 

App. 1 et seq. by charging unjust and 

unreasonable rates and charges for all of 

SFPP’s jurisdictional interstate services 

associated with its West Line and its 

Watson VDC facilities. 

Airline Complainants request that the 

Commission: (1) Examine the challenge 

rates and charges collected by SFPP for 

its West Line and Watson VDC 

jurisdictional interstate service; (2) 

determine, consistent with the 

Commission precedent, that SFPP’s 

rates for the West Line and the Watson 

VDC are unjust and unreasonable; (3) 

determine just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory rates for SFPP’s West 

Line and Watson VDC jurisdictional 

interstate services; (4) order reparations 

and/or refunds to Airline Complainants, 

including appropriate interest thereon, 

for the applicable reparations and/or 

refunds periods; (5) award Airline 

Complainants reasonable attorney’s fees 

and costs; and (6) order such other relief 

as may be appropriate. 

Airline Complainants state that they 

have served this complaint on SFPP. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to 

protest this filing must file in 

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 

385.214). Protests will be considered by 

the Commission in determining the 

appropriate action to be taken, but will 

not serve to make protestants parties to 

the proceeding. Any person wishing to 

become a party must file a notice of 

intervention or motion to intervene, as 

appropriate. The Respondent’s answer 

and all interventions, or protests must 

be filed on or before the comment date. 

The Respondent’s answer, motions to 

intervene, and protests must be served 

on the Complainants. 

The Commission encourages 

electronic submission of protests and 

interventions in lieu of paper using the 

‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 14 copies 

of the protest or intervention to the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

This filing is accessible on-line at 

http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for 

review in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room in Washington, DC. 

There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the 

web site that enables subscribers to 

receive e-mail notification when a 

document is added to a subscribed 

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC 

Online service, please e-mail 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern 

standard time on October 12, 2004.

Linda Mitry, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E4–2394 Filed 9–27–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Project No. 2105–089, California] 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company; 

Notice of Intention To Hold Public 

Meetings for Discussion of the Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

the Upper North Fork Feather River 

Hydropower Project 

September 21, 2004. 

On September 10, 2004, the 

Commission staff delivered the Upper 

North Fork Feather River Project Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) 

to the Environmental Protection Agency 

and mailed it to resource and land 

management agencies, interested 

organizations, and individuals. 

The DEIS was noticed in the Federal 

Register on September 17, 2004 (69 FR 

56054) and comments are due 

November 1, 2004. The DEIS evaluates 

the environmental consequences of the 

issuance of a new license for the 

continued operation and maintenance of 

the Upper North Fork Feather River 

Project, located in Plumas County, 

California. The project occupies 1,500 

acres of land administered by the Forest 

Supervisors of the Lassen and Plumas 

National Forests. It also evaluates the 

environmental effects of implementing 

the licensee’s proposals, agency and 

NGO recommendations, staff’s 

recommendations, and the no-action 

alternative. 

Two public meetings, which will be 

recorded by an official stenographer, are 

scheduled as follows. 

Date: Tuesday, October 19, 2004. 

Time: 6–9 p.m. (p.s.t.). 

Place: Veterans Memorial Hall. 

Address: 225 Gay Street, Chester, 

California.

Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2004. 

Time: 1–4 p.m. (p.s.t.). 

Place: Chico Masonic Family Center, 

Yorkrite Room. 

Address: 1110 West East Avenue, 

Chico, California. 

At these meetings, resource agency 

personnel and other interested persons 

will have the opportunity to provide 

oral and written comments and 

recommendations regarding the DEIS for 

the Commission’s public record. 

For further information, please 

contact John Mudre at e-mail address 

john.mudre@ferc.gov, or by telephone at 

(202) 502–8902.

Magalie R. Salas, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E4–2393 Filed 9–27–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P