alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58542-58543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21946]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on July 22, 
2004, Lifepoint, Inc., 10400 Trademark Street, Rancho Cucamonga, 
California 91730, made application by renewal to the Drug

[[Page 58543]]

Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Methamphetamine (1105).....................  II
Phencyclidine (7471).......................  II
Ecgonine (9180)............................  II
Morphine (9300)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to produce small quantities of controlled 
substances for use in drug test kits.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCD) and must be filed no later than November 29, 2004.

    Dated: September 16, 2004.
William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-21946 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
### Subpart E—Registration of and Information Concerning Pension, Etc., Plans

Sec.
6057.
Annual registration, etc.
6058.
Information required in connection with certain plans of deferred compensation.
6059.
Periodic report by actuary. 1

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1974**—Pub. L. 93–406, title II, §1031(a), Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 943, added subpart heading and analysis of sections.

1  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
MICHAEL STEVE COX,

Petitioner,
vs. THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, Respondent. MICHAEL STEVE COX, Petitioner,
vs. THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, Respondent. No. 62079

No. 62080



### ORDER DENYING WRIT PETITIONS These are seven original proper person petitions for extraordinary relief. The petitions are not consolidated.

Having considered these petitions and supporting documents, we conclude that petitioner's arguments lack merit and that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. Accordingly, we deny the petitions. NRAP 21(b)(1); NRAP 21(c).

Additionally, as demonstrated by the this order, petitioner has filed numerous meritless proper person petitions in this court seeking extraordinary writ relief and has further filed a number of similarly meritless appeals in this court. 

### See Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60056, 

### Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60151, 

### Cox 

### v. Bannister, Docket No. 60637, 

### Cox v. State, Docket No. 61322. We caution appellant that continued filing of such meritless petitions and appeals may result in restrictions on his ability to file papers in this court in forma pauperis. 

### See Jordan v. State, Dept. of Motor Vehicles & Pub. Safety, 121 Nev. 44, 110 P.3d 30 (2005),

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(01 947A 2

### abrogated on other grounds by Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124

Nev. 224, 181 P.3d 670 (2008).

It is so ORDERED. 1

Hardesty

Parraguirre

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Michael Steve Cox Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk White Pine County Clerk Eighth District Court Clerk

'In each of these writ petitions, this court has received petitioner's requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We direct the clerk of this court to file the May 17, 2011, and the June 28, 2011, motions in Docket No. 58292; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60404; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60406; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60407; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60409; the November 20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62079; and the November 20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62080. Because petitioner was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in each of these writ petitions, no action is required on these motions.

3
§ 19.3 Reviews of roadless areas and roadless islands. ( a ) The Secretary is required by section 3(c) of the Wilderness Act to review every roadless area of 5,000 contiguous acres or more in each unit of the National Park System and every roadless area of 5,000 contiguous acres or more and every roadless island in the national wildlife refuges and game ranges of the National Wildlife Refuge System, which was under the supervision of the Secretary on September 3, 1964. The Secretary is further required to recommend to the President whether each such area and island is suitable or not suitable for preservation as wilderness. Reports and recommendations must be submitted by the Secretary in time to permit the President to advise the Congress of his recommendations thereon: ( 1 ) Covering not less than one-third of such areas and islands by September 3, 1967;
( 2 ) Covering not less than an additional one-third by not later than September 3, 1971; and
( 3 ) Covering the remainder by not later than September 3, 1974.
( b ) The primary objective of the Department of the Interior's review of roadless areas and roadless islands pursuant to section 3(c) of the Wilderness Act and the regulations of this part shall be to identify and recommend for preservation as wilderness, by inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, those areas which, after consideration of all relevant factors, it is concluded will achieve the policy of the Congress, as expressed in section 2(a) of the Wilderness Act.
( c ) Nothing in the sections of this part shall, by implication or otherwise, be construed to lessen the authority of the Secretary with respect to the maintenance of roadless areas within units of the National Park System or the maintenance of roadless areas and islands within units of the National Wildlife Refuge System.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bertha Williams, Appellant.

Motion granted. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.
#### § 2920.2 Procedures for public-initiated land use proposals.
§ 3171.18 Rights-of-Way and Special Use Authorizations. ( a ) The BLM or the FS will notify the operator of any additional Rights-of-Way, Special Use Authorizations, licenses, or other permits that are needed for roads and support facilities for drilling or off-lease access, as appropriate. This notification will normally occur at the time the operator submits the APD or Notice of Staking package, or Sundry Notice, or during the onsite inspection.
( b ) The BLM or the FS, as appropriate, will approve or accept on-lease activities that are associated with actions proposed in the APD or Sundry Notice and that will occur on the lease as part of the APD or Sundry Notice. These actions do not require a Right-of- Way or Special Use Authorization. For pipeline Rights-of-Way crossing lands under the jurisdiction of two or more Federal surface managing agencies, except lands in the National Park Service or Indian lands, applications should be submitted to the BLM. Refer to 43 CFR parts 2800 and 2880 for guidance on BLM Rights-of-Way and 36 CFR part 251 for guidance on FS Special Use Authorizations. ( 1 ) *Rights-of-Way (BLM).* ( i ) For BLM lands, the APD package may serve as the supporting document for the Right-of-Way application in lieu of a Right-of-Way plan of development.
( ii ) Any additional information specified in 43 CFR parts 2800 and 2880 will be required in order to process the Right- of-Way. The BLM will notify the operator within 10 days of receipt of a Notice of Staking, APD, or other notification if any parts of the project require a Right- of-Way. If a Right-of-Way is needed, the information required from the operator to approve the Right-of-Way may be submitted by the operator with the APD package if the Notice of Staking option has been used.
( 2 ) *Special Use Authorizations (FS) ( 36 CFR part 251, subpart B ).* When a Special Use Authorization is required, the Surface Use Plan of Operations may serve as the application for the Special Use Authorization if the facility for which a Special Use Authorization is required is adequately described (see 36 CFR 251.54(d)(ii)). Conditions regulating the authorized use may be imposed to protect the public interest, to ensure compatibility with other NFS lands programs and activities consistent with the Forest Land and Resources Management Plan. A Special Use Authorization, when related to an APD, will include terms and conditions (36 CFR 251.56) and may require a specific reclamation plan or adopt applicable parts of the Surface Use Plan of Operations by reference.
EXHIBIT 99.1

The
following certification accompanies the issuer's Annual Report of Form 10-KSB and is not filed, as provided in Release 33-8212, 34-47551 dated March 21, 2003.

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Coast Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Jack C.
Wauchope, Chief Executive Officer of Coast Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coast Bancorp and will be retained by Coast Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

Dated:
March 27, 2003

| | /s/ Jack C. WauchopeJACK C. WAUCHOPE Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
| |                                                                                            | 

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2


                                 PowerLinx, Inc.

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PowerLinx, Inc. he Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Tomlinson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to PowerLinx, Inc. and will be retained by PowerLinx, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


              /s/ Michael Tomlinson
              ---------------------
              Michael Tomlinson
              Chief Executive Officer
              May 15, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Emetia Polizio, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court of Queens County, convicting the defendant of the crime of book-making, unanimously affirmed. (Code Grim. Pro., § 542.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
### **Subchapter C—Determination of Interest Rate; Compounding of Interest**

Sec.
6621.
Determination of rate of interest.
6622.
Interest compounded daily.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §344(b)(3)(A), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 636, inserted "; Compounding of Interest" after "Rate" in heading for subchapter C.

Pub. L. 97–248, title III, §344(b)(2), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 636, added item 6622.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

 

To the Board of Directors

Landmark Bancorp, Inc.

 

We consent to incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-103091, on Form S-8 of LandmarkBancorp, Inc., of our report dated October 26, 2000, relating to theconsolidated balance sheet of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (formerly LandmarkBancshares, Inc.) and subsidiary as of September 30, 2000, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensiveincome, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Landmark Bancorp, Inc.

 

 

 
|             |   | /s/ Regier  Carr & Monroe, L.L.P. |   |
|------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|             |   |                                  |
|             |   |                                  |
| March 27,  2003  |   |                                  |
| Wichita,  Kansas |   |                                  |

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that the Indiana Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene a meeting from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m. on Thursday, February 26, 2004, at the Julia Carson Center, 300 East Fall Creek Parkway, Indianapolis, Indiana 46205. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss civil rights issues of interest and plan future activities. The original notice stated the meeting time from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. this notice is being issued to inform the public of this time change. 

                    Persons desiring additional information should contact Hollis Hughes, Committee Chairperson at 574-232-8201 or Constance M. Davis, Director of the Midwestern Regional Office 312-353-8311, (TDD 312-353-8362). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at                           ( print page 5314)                        least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.                 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, January 29, 2004. 

Ivy L. Davis, 

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. 04-2211 Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
### §5396. Application of other sections of this chapter

#### (a) Mandatory application

All provisions of sections 5305(b), 5306, 5307, 5321(c) and (d), 5323, 5324(k) and (l), 5325(a) through (k), and 5332 of this title and section 314 of Public Law 101–512 (coverage under chapter 171 of title 28, commonly known as the "Federal Tort Claims Act"), to the extent not in conflict with this subchapter, shall apply to compacts and funding agreements authorized by this subchapter.

#### (b) Discretionary application

At the request of a participating Indian tribe, any other provision of subchapter I of this chapter, to the extent such provision is not in conflict with this subchapter, shall be made a part of a funding agreement or compact entered into under this subchapter. The Secretary is obligated to include such provision at the option of the participating Indian tribe or tribes. If such provision is incorporated it shall have the same force and effect as if it were set out in full in this subchapter. In the event an Indian tribe requests such incorporation at the negotiation stage of a compact or funding agreement, such incorporation shall be deemed effective immediately and shall control the negotiation and resulting compact and funding agreement.

(Pub. L. 93–638, title V, §516, as added Pub. L. 106–260, §4, Aug. 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 729.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 314 of Pub. L. 101–512, referred to in subsec. (a), is section 314 of Pub. L. 101–512, which is set out as a note under section 5321 of this title.

Subchapter I of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "title I", meaning title I of Pub. L. 93–638, known as the Indian Self-Determination Act, which is classified principally to subchapter I (§5321 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 458aaa–15 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 3273.21 What are my obligations under the site license? As the facility operator, you: ( a ) Must comply with the requirements of § 3200.4;
( b ) Are liable for all damages to the lands, property, or resources of the United States caused by yourself, your employees, or your contractors or their employees;
( c ) Must indemnify the United States against any liability for damages or injury to persons or property arising from the occupancy or use of the lands authorized under the site license; and
( d ) Must restore any disturbed surface, and remove all structures when they are no longer needed for facility construction or operation. This includes the utilization facility if you cannot operate the facility and you are not diligent in your efforts to return the facility to operation.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-2828

___________

Margoth Villalobos, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Board

* of Immigration Appeals.

Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General *

of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: May 16, 2011

 Filed: May 19, 2011

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Guatemalan citizen Margoth Villalobos petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying an emergency stay of removal, and the

BIA’s later decision on her motion to reopen. We lack jurisdiction to review the

BIA’s denial of a stay because it is not a final order of removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252;

Mapoy v. Carroll, 185 F.3d 224, 230 (4th Cir. 1999), and Villalobos’s petition for

review of the BIA’s decision on her motion to reopen is untimely, see 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(b)(1); Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). Accordingly, we dismiss the

petitions. 

________________________
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-02-15T02:21:23-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 22, 2021

No. 04-21-00182-CR

Casey Ray ESCOBAR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR6126

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

It is so ORDERED on September 22, 2021

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of September, 2021.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
#### Stone *v.*Town of Tallulah Falls *et al.*Stone *v.*Hunnicutt, mayor, *et al.*

December 14, 1910.

Trover. Before Judge Kimsey. Rabun superior court. December 28, 1909.

*J. C. Edwards, T. L. Bynum,*and *B. E. A. Ilamby,*for plaintiff in error. W. *8. Paris*and *II. II. Dean,*contra.

Beck, J.

1. Where the authorities of a municipal corporation seized and impounded certain hogs under and by virtue of an ordinance making it unlawful for the owner to permit “hogs to run at large upon the streets of the town,” and fixing a penalty for the violation of the ordinance, and the owner brought trover to recover the animals thus impounded, it was error for the court, in charging the jury, to construe the ordinance in question so as to make its terms applicable in case the animals seized were at large anywhere within the -corporate limits of the town, although they might not have been “running at large upon the streets.”

2. Except as indicated in the preceding headnote, no error is shown in the charge of the court nor in any of its rulings.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, W. Russell Scheirman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated:May 9, 2006 

 

 

29
### **Subchapter U—Designation and Treatment of Empowerment Zones, Enterprise Communities, and Rural Development Investment Areas**

Part
I.
Designation.
II.
Tax-exempt facility bonds for empowerment zones and enterprise communities.
III.
Additional incentives for empowerment zones.
IV.
Incentives for education zones.
V.
Regulations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter U consisted of sections 1391 to 1397, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–514, title XIII, §1303(a), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2658.

#### Amendments

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title II, §226(b)(1), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 824, added items for parts IV and V and struck out former item for part IV "Regulations".