alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,023

 1,114

 1,112

 1,037

 974

 738

 642

 762

 950

 951

 837

 704

 696

 640

 786

 796

 810

 760

 649

 775

 776

 725

 762

 798

 756

 601

 230

 206

 320

 441

 442

 938

 1,024

 1,027

 949

 750

 632

 596

 645

 765

 834

 659

 658

 640

 577

 647

 741

 761

 645

 623

 653

 710

 669

 720

 754

 629

 225

 182

 191

 191

 323

 379

 986

 1,062

 1,070

 982

 861

 674

 616

 700

 861

 881

 736

 679

 675

 621

 722

 774

 789

 699

 631

 712

 741

 698

 730

 774

 722

 352

 203

 198

 242

 371

 408

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 29,513

 29,572

 29,627

 29,441

 28,983

 28,376

 27,844

 27,453

 27,267

 27,140

 26,904

 26,692

 26,400

 26,049

 25,695

 25,373

 25,113

 24,802

 24,449

 24,245

 24,111

 23,983

 23,841

 23,749

 23,571

 23,080

 22,474

 21,852

 21,259

 20,762

 20,184

 984

 986

 988

 981

 966

 946

 928

 915

 909

 905

 897

 890

 880

 868

 857

 846

 837

 827

 815

 808

 804

 799

 795

 792

 786

 769

 749

 728

 709

 692

 673

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §337a. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §702, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2787

Section, act Mar. 1, 1933, ch. 160, §1, 47 Stat. 1418, related to Indian allotments in San Juan County, Utah.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §702, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2787, provided that this section is repealed effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, except such effective date to be on and after the tenth anniversary of the date of approval of this Act, Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as the homestead laws apply to public lands in Alaska.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2786, set out as a note under section 1701 of Title 43, Public Lands.
§ 3830.12 What are the characteristics of a locatable mineral? ( a ) Minerals are locatable if they meet the requirements in § 3830.11 and are: ( 1 ) Recognized as a mineral by the scientific community; and
( 2 ) Found on Federal lands open to mineral entry.
( b ) Under the Surface Resources Act, certain varieties of mineral materials are locatable if they are uncommon because they possess a distinct and special value. As provided in *McClarty* v. *Secretary of the Interior,* 408 F.2d 907 (9th Cir. 1969), we determine whether mineral materials have a distinct and special value by: ( 1 ) Comparing the mineral deposit in question with other deposits of such minerals generally;
( 2 ) Determining whether the mineral deposit in question has a unique physical property;
( 3 ) Determining whether the unique property gives the deposit a distinct and special value;
( 4 ) Determining whether, if the special value is for uses to which ordinary varieties of the mineral are put, the deposit has some distinct and special value for such use; and
( 5 ) Determining whether the distinct and special value is reflected by the higher price that the material commands in the market place.
( c ) Block pumice having one dimension of 2 or more inches is an uncommon variety of mineral material under the Surface Resources Act, and is subject to location under the mining laws.
( d ) Limestone of chemical or metallurgical grade, or that is suitable for making cement, is subject to location under the mining laws.
( e ) Gypsum suitable for the manufacture of wall board or plaster, or uses requiring a high state of purity, is subject to location under the mining laws.
#### § 3430.3 Planning and environment.
### §581. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–206, §1, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 737, which related to disposition of judgment funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §941d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–116, §6, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1122, which related to ratification of prior transfers of land or natural resources and extinguishment of aboriginal title, rights, and claims, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 58371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22013]



[[Page 58371]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 170

[Docket No. 2001N-0234]


Food Additives: Food Contact Substance Notification System; 
Withdrawal

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal of our advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) 
published in the Federal Register of May 21, 2002 (67 FR 35764). The 
ANPRM requested input on whether the agency should establish 
regulations permitting the licensing of the rights to manufacture and 
market a food contact substance (FCS) for a use that is the subject of 
an effective food contact notification (FCN). FDA is withdrawing the 
ANPRM based upon comments indicating that such a regulation would not 
be necessary.

DATES: The advance notice of proposed rulemaking is withdrawn September 
30, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth McAdams, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-275), Food and Drug Administration, 
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 202-418-3392, e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3c8c6cdcdc6d7cb8dcec0c2c7c2ced0e3c0c5d0c2cd8dc5c7c28dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4cfc1cacac1d0cc8ac9c7c5c0c5c9d7e4c7c2d7c5ca8ac2c0c58ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of May 21, 2002 (67 
FR 35764), FDA published an ANPRM requesting input on whether the 
agency should establish regulations permitting the licensing of the 
rights to manufacture and market an FCS for a use that is the subject 
of an effective FCN. We received five comments on the ANPRM. Three of 
the comments, from individuals, concerned unrelated issues and did not 
address the ANPRM. The other two comments, from the American Plastics 
Council and the Society of the Plastics Industry, stated that a 
procedure to transfer or license the rights to an FCN is not needed 
because of the speed and efficiency of the current FCN system. Both 
comments also stated that if regulations for such a procedure are 
issued, they should be kept simple, requiring only notification that 
the transfer has occurred.
    After careful consideration of these comments, FDA has concluded 
that a procedural regulation for transferring or licensing the rights 
to an FCN is not needed. Therefore, FDA is withdrawing our ANPRM.

    Dated: September 17, 2004.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22013 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-20556 Summary Calendar

KENNEY & ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

CENTRAL UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

H-96-CV-2424)

June 14, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This appeal involves the claim of Kenney & Associates, Inc.

("Kenney") for breach of contract against Central United Life

Insurance Company ("C ULIC") for CULIC’s failure to pay a one

percent (1%) finder’s fee to Kenney. CULIC defended against the

claim by denying the existence of any contract, or in the

alternative, if a con tract existed, Kenney allegedly did not2

perform under the terms of the contract. CULIC moved for summary

judgment but the district court denied such motion on the grounds

t hat there were material facts in dispute regarding the services

Kenney was to perform under the contract. The controversy was

submitted to the jury on special issues. The district court

entered judgment on the jury verdict in favor of Kenney. CULIC

appeals from the final judgment and the later order denying CULIC’s

renewed motion for jud gment as a matter of law, or in the

alternative motion for new trial, or in the alternative motion to

amend judgment.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, t he reply brief, the

record excerpts and relevant portions of the record itself. For

the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum and

Order entered May 12, 1998, we AFFIRM the Final Judgment entered by

the district court under date of December 17, 1997.

AFFIRMED

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the names of new members of the Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate Performance Review Board. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shirley Schell, Executive Resources Program Manager, Human Capital Division, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20742, 202-646-3297. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

5 U.S.C. 4314 (c)(4) requires agencies to publish notice of Performance Review Board appointees in the                     **Federal Register**                     before their service begins. The role of the Performance Review Board is to review and make recommendations to the appointing authority on performance management issues such as appraisals, pay adjustments, bonuses, and Presidential Rank Awards for members of the Senior Executive Service. Under Secretary Michael D. Brown has named the following members of the Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate Performance Review Board:                 
      ( print page 59612)    
Patricia Stahlschmidt, Director, Strategic Planning and Evaluation. 

Thomas McQuillan, Program Advisor, Facilities Management Division. 

Edward Kernan, Chief Information Policy and Resources Management. 

David Trissell, Associate General Counsel. 

Michael Hall, Acting Director, Human Capital Division. 

Charlie Dickerson, Deputy Administrator, U.S. Fire Administration. 

David Maurstad, Regional Director, Region VIII, Denver, CO. 

Reynold Hoover, Director Office of National Security Coordination. 

Dated: September 30, 2004. 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-22364 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-49-P
JOHN DAVID ADAMS’ NOTICE OF EXPEDITED APPEAL PAGE 1 NO. 416

- 01104

- 2015 STARSIDE CUSTOM BUILDERS, LLC, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § Plaintiff, § § v. § 416 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT § JOHN DAVID ADAMS, and DARA A. ADAMS, § § § Defendants. § COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS
DEFENDANT JOHN DAVID ADAMS’ NOTICE OF EXPEDITED APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT: Plaintiff John David Adams , under the authority of Rule 25 TRAP, files this notice of appeal. 1. A motion to dismiss (Defendant John David Adams’ First Supplemental Motion to Dismiss ) was brought by Defendant against Plaintiff pursuant to Chapter 27 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. A hearing was held on such motion on August 14, 2015. The statutory deadline for the Court to rule on the motion was on September 14 , 2015. 2. The 416 th Judicial District Court in Collin County, Texas failed to rule on Defendant John David Adams’ First Supplemental Motion to Dismiss in Cause No. 416

- 01104

- 2015 styled , Starside Custom Builders, LLC v. John David Adams and Dara A. Adams
. 3
. From this denial of Defendant John David Adams’ First Supplemental Motion to Dismiss by operation of law , Defendant John David Adams desire s to appeal to the Fifth District Court of Appeals, in Dallas, Texas. Such appeal is interlocutory. 4
. The appeal of this case is an expedited and/or accelerated appeal, pursuant to Section 27.008 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
SIGNED this 22nd day of September, 2015
. Filed: 9/22/2015 5:04:05 PM Andrea S. Thompson District Clerk Collin County, Texas By Sandra Hill Deputy Envelope ID: 7045214 ACCEPTED 05-15-01162-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS 10/6/2015 3:54:53 PM

LISA MATZ CLERKJOHN DAVID ADAMS’ NOTICE OF EXPEDITED APPEAL PAGE 2 Respectfully submitted, THE SUSTER LAW GROUP, PLLC 1316 Village Creek Dr., Ste. 500 Plano, Texas 75093

-4461 Telephone: (972) 380

- 0130 Facsimile: (972) 380

-4517 Email: office@susterlaw.com
/s/ Israel Suster

___________________ Israel Suster State Bar No. 19523580 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT JOHN DAVID ADAMS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on September 22 , 2015, a true and correct copy of Defendant John David Adams’ Notice of Expedited Appeal was served on the following: Nathan Allen, Jr. VIA ELECTRONIC SERVICE Jones, Allen & Fuquay, LLP 8828 Greenville Avenue Dallas, Texas 75243 Attorney for Plaintiff Byron Henry VIA ELECTRONIC SERVICE Cowles & Thompson 901 Main St, Suite 3900 Dallas, TX 75202 Attorney for Defendant Dara A. Adams
/s/ Israel Suster

___________________ Israel Suster
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theannual report of Lawson Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period endedMay 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Barbieri, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| July 29,  2005 | /s/ Robert G. Barbieri                                                  |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                | Robert  G. Barbieri                                                     |
|                | *Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial and Performance Officer* |

 

----
§ 3910.32 Environmental analysis. ( a ) Before the BLM will issue an exploration license, the BLM, in consultation with any affected surface management agency, will perform the appropriate NEPA analysis of the actions contemplated in the application.
( b ) For each exploration license, the BLM will include terms and conditions needed to protect the environment and resource values of the area and to ensure reclamation of the lands disturbed by the exploration activities.
#### Bessie E. Haskell, Appellant, v. Ernest Grossman, Respondent.

All concur.
Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed July 7 , 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00157

- CV

____________ ORLANDO TARANGO MART INEZ AND SONYA ANN M ARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF MINOR , MARIAH ALEXANDRIA MARTINEZ, DESTINY JA NAY MARTINEZ, JULISSA AMARIE MARTI NEZ AND ORLANDO MART INEZ, JR. , Appellant s
V. DCP MIDSTREAM, LP, J OHN PAUL WHITE AND M ARK ANTHONY BARERRA , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 60902



### ABATEMENT ORDER

On June 28, 2016 , the parties filed a joint motion to abate the appeal pending a limited remand to approve a settlement agreement . The motion is granted. Accordingly, we issue the following order.The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s

active docket until September 15, 2016 . The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its
own motion.

PER CURIAM
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### §§ 17.561-17.569 [Reserved]
##

#

#

#

#

# #

#

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T35N

T34N

T33N

T32N

T31N

T30N

T29N

T28N

T27N

T26N

T25N

R114W R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

T36N

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

APPROVED PINEDALE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

# Unoccupied Greater Sage Grouse Leks

Occupied Greater Sage-Grouse lek 1/4 mile No Surface Occupancy

Occupied Greater Sage-Grouse lek 2 mile Seasonal Stipulation

Greater Sage-Grouse Nesting

and Brood Rearing Habitats

Map 2-36

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers
### §3004. Summary for unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects, and cultural patrimony

#### (a) In general

Each Federal agency or museum which has possession or control over holdings or collections of Native American unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony shall provide a written summary of such objects based upon available information held by such agency or museum. The summary shall describe the scope of the collection, kinds of objects included, reference to geographical location, means and period of acquisition and cultural affiliation, where readily ascertainable.

#### (b) Requirements

(1) The summary required under subsection (a) shall be—

(A) in lieu of an object-by-object inventory;

(B) followed by consultation with tribal government and Native Hawaiian organization officials and traditional religious leaders; and

(C) completed by not later than the date that is 3 years after November 16, 1990.

(2) Upon request, Indian Tribes 1 and Native Hawaiian organizations shall have access to records, catalogues, relevant studies or other pertinent data for the limited purposes of determining the geographic origin, cultural affiliation, and basic facts surrounding acquisition and accession of Native American objects subject to this section. Such information shall be provided in a reasonable manner to be agreed upon by all parties.

(Pub. L. 101–601, §6, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3053.)

1 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized.
### §3078. Regulations

Not later than 1 year after December 21, 2022, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Attorney General, and after consultation with Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, shall promulgate rules and regulations to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 117–258, §10, Dec. 21, 2022, 136 Stat. 2385.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 117–258, Dec. 21, 2022, 136 Stat. 2372, known as the Safeguard Tribal Objects of Patrimony Act of 2021, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3071 of this title and Tables.
Trafi Finnish Transport Safety Agency 

CERTIFICAITON OF 

RECIPROCITY 

Date 24 April 2015 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director 

Ind.No TRAFI 21782/03.02.00.00/2014 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20509 

Facsimile +1 202 267 5364 

brian.morris@faa.gov 

CERTIFICATION OF RECIPROCITY 

Dear Mr.Gretch, 

Ref OST-2006-24269 

The Finnish Transport Safety Agency hereby confirms that it will grant, on the basis 

of reciprocity, to any air carrier designated by the United States of America, the 

right to conduct third, fourth and fifth freedom traffic rights on scheduled or nonscheduled basis, which are in conformity with the Air Transport Agreement between 

the European Union and its Member States and the United States of America, 

signed on 25 and 30 April 2007 as amended by the provisionally applicable Protocol 

to Amend the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America and 

the European Community and Its Member States, signed on 24 June 2010. 

Sincerely yours 

~~~ Dr. Matti Tupamaki 

Deputy to Director General of Civil Aviation 

Finnish Transport Safety Agency • P.O. Box 320, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland 

Tel. +358 29 534 5000, fax +358 29 534 5095 • Business ID 1031715-9 

www.trafi.fi
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Feel Golf
Co., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Lee Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o (d));
      and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Feel Golf
      Co., Inc., Inc.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  FEEL GOLF
CO., INC.
 /s/ 
      Lee MillerLee
      Miller


Chief
      Executive Officer






Date: April 14,
2010