alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3281.16 When must a Plan of Development be submitted to BLM? ( a ) The prospective unit operator must submit an initial Plan of Development at the time the unit area is proposed for designation.
( b ) Subsequent Plans of Development that were not already provided must be submitted to address future unit activities to be conducted throughout the term of the unit agreement. For example, if the Plan only addressed activities until a unit well is completed, the subsequent Plan must address activities including the drilling of additional unit wells until a producible well is completed. Once a producible well is completed, the Plan or subsequent Plan must address those activities related to utilizing the resource.
( c ) There is no requirement to submit a Plan of Development once unitized resources begin commercial operation.
!

!

 ̈§¦25

 ̈§¦90

 ̈§¦90

 ̈§¦80

Hot Springs

Yellowstone

National Park

Washakie

Sheridan

Goshen

Niobrara

Weston

Laramie

Big Horn

Platte

Uinta

Converse

Crook

Johnson

Teton

Campbell

Lincoln

Sublette

Albany

Natrona

Sweetwater Carbon

Fremont

Park

Casper

Cheyenne

Mule Deer

Map 4-13

Cumulative Impact Analysis Area (CIAA)

Pinedale Planning Area

Mule Deer CIAA

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

0 10 20 40 60 80 100

Miles

0 15 30 60 90 120 150

Kilometers

Wyoming

Data Source: Wyoming Game and Fish Department
\

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-93,764-01

EX PARTE DEMETRIUS BEASON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W16-52471-M(A) IN THE 194TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of burglaryof a habitation and sentenced to 10 years’imprisonment.

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that his right to due process was violated when he was denied

consideration for shock probation through no fault of his own. Specifically, Applicant states that his

hearing on the 178 day from the date of the execution of his sentence was postponed, and he was th

not returned to the trial court until the 181 day, when the trial court no longer had jurisdiction. TEX.

st

CODE CRIM. PROC. Art. 42A.202. The State agrees that Applicant is entitled to relief.
2

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. However, the trial court

has not entered findings and conclusions. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. Art. 11.07, § 3(c), (d).

Additionally, the parties refer to a docket sheet that is not part of the record before this Court.

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In developing the record, the trial court may use

any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the

trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is still represented by

counsel. If Applicant is not represented by counsel, is indigent, and wants to be represented by

counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this

Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

is eligible for shock probation, and whether his right to due process was violated when he was denied

consideration for shock probation. The trial court maymake any other findings and conclusions that

it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
3

Filed: October 19, 2022

Do not publish
§ 3517.16 How does BLM process my application? ( a ) We will consider whether the agreement will conserve natural resources and is in the public interest.
( b ) Once the agreement is signed by all the parties, we may approve it.
Exhibit 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



Mark J. Cowan
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
August 3, 2007



<PAGE>
### §500l. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 897, §13, 50 Stat. 902, which directed Secretary, whenever practicable, to appoint natives to administer the industry, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
EXHIBIT 11.1


COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



                         SEAVIEW VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                                     EXHIBIT
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     THREE MONTHS     THREE MONTHS       SIX MONTHS        SIX MONTHS
                                                    ENDED JUNE 30,   ENDED JUNE 30,    ENDED JUNE 30,    ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                        2000              1999             2000               1999
                                                     -----------      -----------       -----------       -----------
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>               <C>               <C>
Net income ....................................      $   176,797      $   (20,589)      $   (61,003)      $    37,104


Shares:

Basic weighted average number of
    shares outstanding ........................        8,003,581        6,304,286         8,552,746         5,063,204
Additional shares adjusted-under nonvested
    stock for diluted earnings per share ......        2,695,285        2,627,077                 0         2,606,709
                                                     -----------      -----------       -----------       -----------

Diluted weighted average number
    of shares outstanding .....................       10,698,866        8,931,363         8,552,746         7,669,913

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income ....................................      $      .022      $      .003       $     (.007)      $      .007

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income ....................................      $      .017      $      .002       $     (.007)      $      .005
</TABLE>
### Paula Kline, Westtown Quaker Meeting. 975 Westtown Rd

### Westtown, PA 

### 19382 Thank you for listening to my comments today. I am a member ofWesttown Monthly Meeting ofthe Religious Society ofFriends. Quakers have a long tradition ofconcern for economic, racial and socialjustice and environmental stewardship. Friends decry the unjust, disproportionate impact climate change is already having on those living in poverty and in the least developed countries, the elderly and children and those least responsible for the emissions ofgreenhouse gases. Climatechangeandotherenvironmental disasterscouldput3.I billionpeople 

### into extreme poverty by 2050 ifno significant steps are

### taken. This is why Istrongly supportthe EPA targets for carbon emissions. At this late date, it is a real question as to whether we will succeed on the climate issue. Given

### this uncertainty, it

### is precisely ouractions nowwhich mattermost Itis 

### inthese situations ofuncertainty that the role ofmoral leadership is most required. The fossil fuel business plan- to explore, extract and sell fossil fuels is not new. And we know that fossil fuel companies do not intentionally include ending life on earth as part oftheir business plan, but it clear that this is an unfortunate and very real side effect oftheir plan. There is now a way to develop secure, reliable energy sources with existing technology and at costs comparable with what we spend on fossil fuel energy today AND save 2.5 million to 3 million lives a year, halt global warming, and reduce air and water pollution. The EPA regulations can set a new global standard for converting the world to clean, renewable energy sources and foregoing fossil fuels. Historians ofthe Holocaust ask: "How could so many good and moral people know what was happening and yet do so little0 " This, I believe, will be the key questions for future historians of the unfurling climate disaster ifwe do not act now.
§ 3715.7 How will BLM inspect my use or occupancy and enforce this subpart? ( a ) BLM field staff is authorized to physically inspect all structures, equipment, workings, and uses located on the public lands. The inspection may include verification of the nature of your use and occupancy to ensure that your use or occupancy is, or continues to be, reasonably incident and in compliance with §§ 3715.2, 3715.2-1, 3715.4-1 and 3715.5.
( b ) BLM will not inspect the inside of structures used solely for residential purposes, unless an occupant or a court of competent jurisdiction gives permission.
#### § 3480.0-4 Scope.

The rules of this part shall govern operations for the exploration, development, and production of Federal coal under Federal coal leases, licenses, and permits, regardless of surface ownership, pursuant to the Mineral Leasing Act of February 25, 1920, as amended (MLA), and in conjunction with the rules at 43 CFR Group 3400 and 30 CFR Chapter VII. Included are provisions relating to resource recovery and protection, royalties, diligent development, continued operation, maximum economic recovery (MER), and logical mining units (LMU's). Except as otherwise provided in 25 CFR Chapter I or Indian lands leases, these rules do not apply to operations on Indian lands. The provisions in these rules relating to advance royalty, diligent development, continued operation, MER, and LMU's shall not apply to Indian lands, leases and permits. The rules governing exploration licenses for unleased Federal coal are codified at 43 CFR part 3410. Until final rulemaking is promulgated and implemented by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) regarding the initial Federal lands Programs, the initial Federal lands Program rules codified at 30 CFR part 211 (1981) shall remain in effect.
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

			Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of the			registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's Annual			Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-KSB")			fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities			Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB,			fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results			of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: April 13, 2007
			 By: /s/ Atsushi Maki					Atsushi Maki					Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2017 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures
Inc.





|Date: April 6, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                    |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
### §728. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 23, 1954, ch. 831, §8, 68 Stat. 769, which related to protection of Alabama and Coushatta Indians and conservation of resources after the date of the proclamation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Robert L. Gerry, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 10, 2010
§ 3481.4-2 What are some examples of circumstances that qualify for a temporary interruption of coal severance? ( a ) Movement, failure, or repair of major equipment, such as draglines or longwalls; overburden removal; adverse weather; employee absences;
( b ) Inability to sever coal due to orders issued by governmental authorities for cessation or relocation of the coal severance operations; and
( c ) Inability to sell or distribute coal severed from the lease or LMU out of or away from the lease or LMU.
[62 FR 44370, Aug. 20, 1997]
#### § 2653.10 Excess selections.

Where land selections by a regional corporation, Native group, any of the four named cities, or a Native pursuant to section 14(h) (1), (2), (3), or (5) exceed the land entitlement, the Bureau of Land Management may request such corporation to indicate its preference among lands selected.

[41 FR 14740, Apr. 7, 1976]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 167

 164

 179

 174

 181

 200

 213

 194

 186

 195

 193

 200

 204

 197

 195

 186

 186

 197

 203

 224

 208

 199

 214

 210

 214

 223

 219

 235

 203

 209

 210

 143

 144

 142

 144

 146

 150

 152

 155

 159

 163

 167

 167

 170

 172

 177

 174

 163

 171

 171

 167

 105

 168

 172

 174

 181

 182

 183

 180

 183

 181

 178

 152

 151

 154

 156

 160

 164

 166

 165

 169

 173

 175

 176

 180

 180

 184

 182

 179

 179

 180

 181

 160

 178

 181

 185

 189

 193

 192

 191

 189

 190

 188

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 28, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Stephen Brock, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
      Public Company Management Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of Public Company Management
      Corporation.





Date:
      December 28, 2006





By:  /s/
      Stephen
      Brock


Stephen
      Brock,


Chief
      Executive Officer
Sacramento

River

T13N R1E

T12N R1E

T13N R2E

T12N R2E

Kirkville

Boyers Landing

Poffenbergers Landing

2 1 6

36

25

35

26

3

30

31

11 12 7

34

27

10

SSUUTTTTEE RR CCOO

YYOOLL OO CC OO

CCOOLLUUSSAA CC OO

52.3 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-5200X-R-1

Exhibit B

Wakida, Tomio

725-202-134

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

Date: November 23, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\wakida_tomio_5200\wakida_tomio.mxd
Exhibit 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


  /s/ Mark J. Cowan
  Mark J. Cowan
  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
  May 9, 2006
<TABLE>

EXHIBIT 12 - COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                              March 31,                            Year Ended
<S>                                       <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>
                                          2000       1999        1999       1998      1997       1996       1995
Income before income
  taxes, equity in earnings of non-
  consolidated affiliates and
  extraordinary item                      (37,205)   (12,043)   220,213    117,922    104,077     71,240     49,817
Dividends and other received from
  nonconsolidated affiliates                  920      2,952      7,079      9,168      4,624     10,430      1,432

Total                                     (36,285)    (9,091)   227,292    127,090    108,701     81,670     51,249

Fixed Charges
Interest expense                           55,549     31,832    192,321    135,766     75,076     30,080     20,752
Amortization of loan fees                     234        649      1,970      2,220      1,451        506      1,004
Interest portion of rentals                17,468      4,747     24,511     16,044      6,120        424        361

Total fixed charges                        73,251     37,228    218,802    154,030     82,647     31,010     22,117

Preferred stock dividends
Tax effect of preferred dividends              --         --         --         --         --         --         --
After tax preferred dividends                  --         --         --         --         --         --         --
Total fixed charges and
  preferred dividends                      73,251     37,228    218,802    154,030     82,647     31,010     22,117

Total earnings available for
 payment of fixed charges                  36,966     25,185    446,094  281,120    191,348
112,680                                    73,366
Ratio of earnings to fixed
  Charges                                    0.50       0.68       2.04       1.83       2.32       3.63       3.32

Rental fees and charges                   116,450     59,338    306,393    200,550     76,500      5,299      4,510
Interest rate                                 15%         8%         8%         8%         8%         8%         8%

</TABLE>
#### Abraham Kerner, Respondent, v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Appellant, and Rachel Kerner, Impleaded Defendant.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lewis Rabinowitz, Appellant, against Joseph Brophy, as Warden of Auburn State Prison, Respondent.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
§ 2885.25 When do I pay monitoring fees? ( a ) *Monitoring Categories 1 through 4.* Unless BLM otherwise directs, you must pay monitoring fees when you submit to BLM your written acceptance of the terms and conditions of the grant or TUP.
( b ) *Monitoring Category 5.* You must pay the monitoring fees as specified in the Master Agreement. BLM will not issue your grant or TUP until it receives the required payment.
( c ) *Monitoring Category 6.* BLM may periodically estimate the costs of monitoring your use of the grant or TUP. BLM will include this fee in the costs associated with processing fees described at § 2884.12 of this part. If BLM has underestimated the monitoring costs, we will notify you of the shortfall. If your payments exceed the actual costs that Federal employees incurred for monitoring, BLM will either reimburse you the difference, or adjust the next billing to reflect the overpayment. Unless BLM gives you written authorization, you may not offset or deduct the overpayment from your payments.
( d ) *Monitoring Categories 1-4 and 6.* If you disagree with the category BLM has determined for your application, you may appeal the decision under § 2881.10 of this part.
[70 FR 21078, Apr. 22, 2005. Redesignated at 73 FR 65074, Oct. 31, 2008]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 Date:  August 23, 2005

/s/
R. Michael RouleauR. Michael RouleauPresident and Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) /s/
Jeffrey N. BoyerJeffrey N. BoyerExecutive Vice President 
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)