alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3451.1 Readjustment of lease terms. ( a ) ( 1 ) All leases issued prior to August 4, 1976, shall be subject to readjustment at the end of the current 20-year period and at the end of each 10-year period thereafter. All leases issued after August 4, 1976, shall be subject to readjustment at the end of the first 20-year period and, if the lease is extended, each 10-year period thereafter.
( 2 ) Any lease subject to readjustment which contains a royalty rate less than the minimum royalty prescribed in § 3473.3-2 of this title shall be readjusted to conform to the minimum prescribed in that section.
( b ) If the lease became subject to readjustment of terms and conditions before August 4, 1976, but the authorized officer prior to that date neither readjusted the terms and conditions nor informed the lessee whether or not a readjustment would be made, the terms and conditions of that lease shall not be readjusted retroactively to conform to the requirements of the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act of 1976.
( c ) ( 1 ) The authorized officer shall, prior to the expiration of the current or initial 20-year period or any succeeding 10-year period thereafter, notify the lessee of any lease which becomes subject to readjustment after June 1, 1980, whether any readjustment of terms and conditions will be made prior to the expiration of the initial 20-year period or any succeeding 10-year period thereafter. On such a lease the failure to so notify the lessee shall mean that the United States is waiving its right to readjust the lease for the readjustment period in question.
( 2 ) In any notification that a lease will be readjusted under this subsection, the authorized officer will prescribe when the decision transmitting the readjusted lease terms will be sent to the lessee. The time for transmitting the information will be as soon as possible after the notice that the lease shall be readjusted, but will not be longer than 2 years after such notice. Failure to send the decision transmitting the readjusted lease terms in the specified period shall constitute a waiver of the right to readjust, unless the delay is caused by events beyond the control of the Department.
( d ) In the notification that the lease will be readjusted, the authorized officer may require the lessee to furnish information specified in § 3422.3-4 of this title for review by the Attorney General as required by section 27(1) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended. If the authorized officer requests the information specified, no lease readjustment shall be effective until 30 days after the authorized officer has transmitted the required information to the Attorney General. The lease shall be subject to cancellation if the lessee fails to furnish the required information within the time allowed.
( e ) The Governor of the affected State will be sent a copy of the readjusted lease terms.
[44 FR 42635, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33146, July 30, 1982; 48 FR 37656, Aug. 19, 1983; 53 FR 37300, Sept. 26, 1988]
#### § 1865.0-2 Objective.

The objective of a correction document is to eliminate from the chain of title errors in patents or other documents of conveyance that have been issued by the United States under laws administered by the Bureau of Land Management or its predecessors and that pertain to the disposal of the public lands or of an interest therein.
### §373b. Restricted estate or homestead on the public domain

If an Indian found to have died intestate without heirs was the holder of a restricted allotment or homestead or interest therein on the public domain, the land or interest therein and all accumulated rents, issues, and profits therefrom shall escheat to the United States, subject to all valid existing agricultural, surface, and mineral leases and the rights of any person thereunder, and the land shall become part of the public domain subject to the payment of such creditors' claims as the Secretary of the Interior may find proper to be paid from the cash on hand or income accruing to said estate: Provided, That if the Secretary determines that the land involved lies within or adjacent to an Indian community and may be advantageously used for Indian purposes, the land or interest therein shall escheat to the United States to be held in trust for such needy Indians as the Secretary of the Interior may designate, where the value of the estate does not exceed $50,000, and in case of estates exceeding said sum, such estates shall be held in trust by the United States for such Indians as the Congress may on and after November 24, 1942 designate, subject to all valid existing agricultural, surface, and mineral leases and the rights of any person thereunder 1 Provided further, That interests in all Burns public domain allotments located in Harney County, Oregon, belonging to Indians who die intestate without heirs shall be held in trust by the United States for the Burns Paiute Indian Colony of Oregon and shall be part of the Burns Paiute Indian Reservation.

(Nov. 24, 1942, ch. 640, §2, 56 Stat. 1022; Pub. L. 98–25, §§2, 3, May 2, 1983, 97 Stat. 185.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 98–25, §2, inserted proviso that interests in all Burns public domain allotments located in Harney County, Oregon, belonging to Indians who die intestate without heirs shall be held in trust by the United States for the Burns Paiute Indian Colony of Oregon and shall be part of the Burns Paiute Indian Reservation.

Pub. L. 98–25, §3, substituted "$50,000" for "$2,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Non-Indian Lands in Harney County, Oregon

Pub. L. 98–25, §2, May 2, 1983, 97 Stat. 185, provided in part that no non-Indian lands in Harney County, Oregon, shall be considered Indian country as defined in section 1151 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a colon.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 577

 610

 636

 658

 704

 735

 732

 746

 739

 759

 759

 746

 755

 763

 760

 742

 728

 739

 746

 737

 732

 781

 787

 803

 787

 793

 800

 778

 817

 802

 553

 566

 613

 636

 654

 688

 709

 729

 701

 725

 703

 715

 720

 745

 723

 711

 716

 705

 698

 694

 703

 709

 736

 748

 750

 737

 736

 748

 768

 774

 568

 584

 625

 648

 677

 717

 722

 738

 729

 744

 749

 732

 738

 756

 737

 726

 721

 723

 721

 717

 717

 750

 755

 776

 766

 752

 771

 764

 787

 786

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 15, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 15,236

 15,130

 15,118

 15,128

 15,190

 15,258

 15,347

 15,477

 15,639

 15,809

 15,957

 16,073

 16,167

 16,333

 16,509

 16,668

 16,829

 17,023

 17,306

 17,681

 18,097

 18,530

 18,954

 19,364

 19,763

 20,170

 20,604

 21,011

 21,394

 21,696

 508

 504

 504

 504

 506

 509

 512

 516

 521

 527

 532

 536

 539

 544

 550

 556

 561

 567

 577

 589

 603

 618

 632

 645

 659

 672

 687

 700

 713

 723

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-50111 

Conference Calendar

__________________

GUADALUPE SAMPAYO,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; DAN MORALES,

Attorney General,

 Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-95-CV-401

- - - - - - - - - -

December 11, 1196

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Guadalupe Sampayo, #100237, appeals from the district

court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Sampayo argues that his trial counsel was

ineffective for failing to obtain a timely subpoena for a codefendant and for failing to investigate and interview potential
No. 96-50111

-2-

witnesses. He also argues that the district court abused its

discretion by failing to allow him to amend his habeas petition

to present a new theory of defense. We have carefully reviewed

the record and the briefs. Sampayo’s ineffective-assistance

claims fail because he has not demonstrated that the state

courts’ determination was the result of “an unreasonable

application of clearly established Federal law, as determined by

the Supreme Court[.]” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). Nor did the

district court abuse its discretion by denying Sampayo leave to

amend his petition. See Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 317

(1963)(claim of factual innocence not of itself a constitutional

issue upon which habeas relief may be granted), overruled on

other grounds by Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1 (1992).

AFFIRMED.
§ 35.8 Service of complaint. ( a ) Service of a complaint must be made by certified or registered mail or by delivery in any manner authorized by Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. *Service is complete upon receipt.*
( b ) Proof of service, stating the name and address of the person on whom the complaint was served, and the manner and date of service, may be made by— ( 1 ) Affidavit of the individual serving the complaint by delivery;
( 2 ) A United States Postal Service return receipt card acknowledging receipt; or
( 3 ) Written acknowledgement of receipt by the defendant or his or her representative.
### §941g. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–116, §9, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1125, which related to tribal constitution and governance, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50284 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LEOPOLDO GARCIA, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:11

- CR

- 1141

- 2

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leopoldo Garcia, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia h a s not filed a respons e. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 21, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50284 Document: 00513883033 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017No. 16

- 50284

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
i s GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-50284 Document: 00513883033 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
§ 3100.33 Option statements. Each option holder must file in the proper BLM office within 90 days after June 30 and December 31 of each year a statement showing: ( a ) Any changes to the statements submitted under § 3100.31(b); and
( b ) The number of acres covered by each option and the total acreage of all options held in each State.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,316.35

 2,316.31

 2,316.12

 2,315.91

 2,315.71

 2,315.50

 2,315.40

 2,315.34

 2,315.14

 2,314.94

 2,314.73

 2,314.40

 2,314.08

 2,313.90

 2,313.71

 2,313.41

 2,312.99

 2,312.58

 2,312.19

 2,311.75

 2,311.47

 2,311.06

 2,310.64

 2,310.24

 2,309.82

 2,309.39

 2,308.99

 2,308.64

 2,308.30

 2,307.81

 1,664.0

 1,663.5

 1,661.0

 1,658.3

 1,655.8

 1,653.1

 1,651.8

 1,651.0

 1,648.5

 1,645.9

 1,643.2

 1,639.0

 1,634.9

 1,632.7

 1,630.2

 1,626.4

 1,621.1

 1,615.9

 1,611.0

 1,605.5

 1,602.0

 1,596.8

 1,591.6

 1,586.6

 1,581.4

 1,576.0

 1,571.0

 1,566.7

 1,562.5

 1,556.5

STORAGE

-0.4

-0.5

-2.4

-2.7

-2.6

-2.7

-1.3

-0.8

-2.6

-2.6

-2.7

-4.2

-4.1

-2.3

-2.4

-3.8

-5.3

-5.2

-4.9

-5.5

-3.5

-5.1

-5.2

-5.0

-5.2

-5.3

-5.0

-4.3

-4.2

-6.0

CHANGE

2,444

2,272

2,157

2,026

1,861

1,748

1,704

1,704

1,797

1,636

1,411

1,256

1,372

1,609

1,491

1,084

846

930

1,048

936

950

766

692

583

699

816

919

808

948

348

INFLOW

 2,631

 2,521

 3,247

 3,282

 3,047

 2,999

 2,233

 2,009

 2,976

 2,809

 2,633

 3,265

 3,313

 2,666

 2,579

 2,886

 3,419

 3,409

 3,399

 3,635

 2,656

 3,272

 3,242

 3,039

 3,293

 3,432

 3,373

 2,926

 3,012

 3,304

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 7

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 8

 11

 144

 98

 106

 106

 117

 83

 113

 117

 128

 112

 116

 97

 127

 116

 112

 130

 130

 92

 66

 88

 96

 62

 44

 77

 51

 62

 54

 91

C.F.S.

 .02

 .03

 .38

 .26

 .28

 .28

 .31

 .22

 .30

 .31

 .34

 .30

 .31

 .26

 .34

 .31

 .30

 .35

 .35

 .25

 .18

 .24

 .26

 .17

 .12

 .21

 .14

 .17

 .15

 .25

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2008 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 8, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -107.8 38,861 90,507 0 7 2,754 7.39 .12

ACRE-FEET -107,800 77,081 179,521 0 14 5,463

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 179,521

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 14

 179,535

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .12

JULY 1, 2007 26.93

 1,664.4

Table 4

(1) (1)
§ 702.147 Enforcement of special fund provisions. ( a ) As provided in section 44(d)(1) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 944(d)(1), for the purpose of making rules, regulations, and determinations under the special fund provisions in section 44 and for providing enforcement thereof, the Director may investigate and gather appropriate data from each carrier and self-insured employer, and may enter and inspect such places and records (and make such transcriptions of records), question such employees, and investigate such facts, conditions, practices, or other matters as he may deem necessary or appropriate. The Director may require the employer to have audits performed of claims activity relating to this Act. The Director may also require detailed reports of payments made under the Act, and of estimated future liabilities under the Act, from any or all carriers of self-insurers. The Director may require that such reports be certified and verified in whatever manner is considered appropriate.
( b ) Pursuant to section 44(d)(3) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 944(d)(3), for the purpose of any hearing or investigation related to determinations or the enforcement of the provisions of section 44 with respect to the special fund, the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 49 and 50 as amended (the Federal Trade Commission Act provisions relating to attendance of witnesses and the production of books, papers, and documents) are made applicable to the jurisdiction, powers, and duties of the Director, OWCP, as the Secretary's delegatee.
( c ) Civil penalties and unpaid assessments shall be collected by civil suits brought by and in the name of the Secretary.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1215-0160) [38 FR 26861, Sept. 26, 1973, as amended at 50 FR 395, Jan. 3, 1985]
Order entered April 24, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01215-CV

PATRICK DAUGHERTY AND HIGHLAND EMPLOYEE RETENTION ASSETS, LLC, 

Appellants/Cross-Appellees

V.

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., Appellee/Cross-Appellant

V.

SIERRA VERDE, LLC, PATRICK BOYCE, WILLIAM L. BRITAIN, AND JAMES 

DONDERO, Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-04005

ORDER

We GRANT the parties’ April 22, 2015 joint motion for extension of time to file briefs

and ORDER appellants’ brief be filed no later than May 20, 2015. We extend the other briefing 

deadlines outlined in our March 24, 2015 order as follows:

•Daugherty’s brief in response to Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC’s brief is 

due no later than June 19, 2015;

•Highland Capital Management, L.P.’s (and all other appellees as to Daugherty, if 

applicable) brief in response to Daugherty’s brief; and Highland Capital Management, 

L.P.’s opening brief as cross-appellant are due no later than June 19, 2015;
•Daugherty’s combined reply brief and appellee’s response to Highland Capital’s 

opening brief is due no later than July 20, 2015;

•Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC’s reply brief is due no later than July 20, 

2015; and

•Highland Capital Management, L.P.’s reply brief to Daugherty’s response is due no later 

than August 10, 2015.

We caution the parties that no further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. 

 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
### PART II—OTHER INSURANCE COMPANIES

Sec.
831.
Tax on insurance companies other than life insurance companies.
832.
Insurance company taxable income.
833.
Treatment of Blue Cross and Blue Shield organizations, etc.
834.
Determination of taxable investment income.
835.
Election by reciprocal.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part II (§§821 to 826) related to mutual insurance companies other than life and certain marine insurance companies and other than fire and flood insurance companies which operated on the basis of perpetual policies or premium deposits, consisted of sections 821–826, prior to repeal (except for sections 822 and 826 which were renumbered sections 834 and 835, respectively, by Pub. L. 99–514, title X, §1024(a)(1)–(3), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2405. See Prior Provisions note set out under section 818 of this title.

#### Amendments

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–647, title I, §1010(f)(7), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3454, substituted "Tax on insurance companies other than life insurance companies" for "Tax on insurance companies (other than life or mutual), mutual marine insurance companies, and certain mutual fire or flood insurance companies" in item 831.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title X, §§1012(b)(2), 1024(a)(2), (c)(18), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2393, 2405, 2408, redesignated part III (§831 et seq.) as II and added items 833, 834, and 835. Former part II (§821 et seq.) was repealed.

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–834, §8(g)(4)(C), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 999, substituted "and certain mutual fire or flood insurance companies" for "and mutual fire insurance companies issuing perpetual policies" in item 831.
#### § 3502.25 Where do I file evidence that I am qualified to hold a permit or lease?

You must file evidence with BLM that you meet the qualification requirements in this subpart. You may file this evidence separately from your permit or lease application, but file it in the same office as your application.
§ 3175.44 Flow-computer software. ( a ) A flow computer of a particular make and model, and equipped with a particular software version, is approved for use at high- and very-high-volume FMPs if the flow computer and software version meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) The documentation required in § 3175.144 has been submitted to the PMT;
( 2 ) The PMT has determined that the flow computer and software version passed the type-testing required in § 3175.140, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section; and
( 3 ) The BLM has approved the flow computer and software version and has placed them on the list of approved equipment maintained at *www.blm.gov*.
( b ) *Software versions (high- and very-high-volume FMPs).* ( 1 ) Software revisions that affect or have the potential to affect determination of flow rate, determination of volume, determination of heating value, or data or calculations used to verify flow rate, volume, or heating value must be type-tested under § 3175.140.
( 2 ) Software revisions that do not affect or have the potential to affect the determination of flow rate, determination of volume, determination of heating value, or data and calculations used to verify flow rate, volume, or heating value are not required to be type-tested, however, the operator must provide the BLM with a list of these software versions and a brief description of what changes were made from the previous version. (The software manufacturer may provide such information instead of the operator.)
( c ) *Software versions (low- and very-low-volume FMPs).* All software versions are approved for use at low- and very-low-volume FMPs, unless otherwise required by the BLM.
December 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* NEW

ACRE-FEET INFLOW MELONES RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAP**

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. RELEASE POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S.

35,667

1 477.91 35,224 -443 -11 4 211 0 0 1

2 477.32 34,781 -443 -11 3 211 0 0 1

3 476.74 34,348 -433 -7 2 210 0 0 1

4 476.11 33,881 -467 -23 4 211 0 0 1

5 475.51 33,443 -438 -9 3 211 0 0 1

6 474.90 33,001 -442 -10 3 212 0 0 1

7 474.28 32,557 -444 -11 3 212 0 0 1

8 473.66 32,118 -439 -9 4 211 0 0 1

9 473.03 31,675 -443 -12 6 210 0 0 1

10 472.39 31,232 -443 -12 5 210 0 0 1

11 475.75 33,618 2,386 1,415 11 211 0 0 1

12 472.35 31,204 -2,414 -1,005 222 211 0 0 1

13 472.98 31,640 436 432 286 211 0 0 1

14 473.49 31,998 358 393 299 211 0 0 2

15 474.45 32,679 681 558 480 212 0 0 3

16 475.53 33,458 779 606 604 211 0 0 2

17 475.95 33,764 306 369 365 212 0 0 3

18 476.41 34,103 339 383 372 211 0 0 1

19 476.27 34,000 -103 159 138 211 0 0 0

20 476.54 34,200 200 312 287 211 0 0 0

21 476.08 33,859 -341 40 49 212 0 0 0

22 475.73 33,603 -256 84 85 212 0 0 1

23 475.73 33,603 0 213 218 212 0 0 1

24 475.74 33,611 8 217 211 212 0 0 1

25 475.72 33,596 -15 205 215 212 0 0 1

26 475.94 33,756 160 294 292 212 0 0 1

27 476.07 33,852 96 261 266 212 0 0 1

28 476.23 33,970 118 271 270 212 0 0 0

29 476.19 33,941 -29 198 202 212 0 0 1

30 476.22 33,963 22 224 205 212 0 0 1

31 476.19 33,941 -22 202 208 212 0 0 1

TOTALS -1,726 5,716 5,322 6,553 0 0 33

ACRE-FEET -1,726 11,338 10,556 12,998 0 0 65

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

** EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM NEW MELONES PAN.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 12,998 Outlet 0

Spill 0 Total 12,998

Historical Archive and Report Database

Tulloch Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/10/2024
#### John Martocci, Respondent, v. Michael Martocci et al., Appellants.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur.