alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMechanical property characterization and impact resistance of selected graphite/PEEK composite materialsTo use graphite/PEEK material on highly curved surfaces requires that the material be drapable and easily conformable to the surface. The mechanical property characterization and impact resistance results are presented for laminates made from two types of graphite/PEEK materials that will conform to a curved surface. These laminates were made from two different material forms. These forms are: (1) a fabric where each yarn is a co-mingled Celion G30-500 3K graphite fiber and PEEK fiber; and (2) an interleaved material of Celion G30-500 3K graphite fiber interleaved with PEEK film. The experimental results from the fabric laminates are compared with results for laminates made from AS4/PEEK unidirectional tape. The results indicate that the tension and compression moduli for quasi-isotropic and orthotropic laminates made from fabric materials are at least 98 pct. of the modulus of equivalent laminates made from tape materials. The strength of fabric material laminates is at least 80 pct. of laminates made from tape material. The evaluation of the fabric material for shear stiffness indicates that a tape material laminate could be replaced by a fabric material laminate and still maintain 89 pct. of the shear stiffness of the tape material laminate.Document ID19910015030Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBaker, Donald J.*(Army Aviation Systems Command Hampton, VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1991Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102769AVSCOM-TR-90-B-012NASA-TM-102769Meeting InformationMeeting: National Technical Specialists Meeting on Advanced Rotorcraft StructuresLocation: Williamsburg, VACountry: United StatesStart Date: October 25, 1988End Date: October 27, 1988Accession Number91N24343Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 532-06-37Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910015030.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 2201.6 Value equalization; cash equalization waiver. ( a ) To equalize the agreed upon values of the Federal and non-Federal lands involved in an exchange, either with or without adjustments of relative values as compensation for various costs, the parties to an exchange may agree: ( 1 ) To modify the exchange proposal by adding or excluding lands; and/or
( 2 ) To use cash equalization after making all reasonable efforts to equalize values by adding or excluding lands.
( b ) The combined amount of any cash equalization payment and/or the amount of adjustments agreed to as compensation for costs under § 2201.1-3 of this part may not exceed 25 percent of the value of the Federal lands to be conveyed.
( c ) The parties may agree to waive a cash equalization payment if the amount to be waived does not exceed 3 percent of the value of the lands being exchanged out of Federal ownership or $15,000, whichever is less. This provision shall not be applied to exchanges where the value differential is in excess of $15,000.
( d ) A cash equalization payment may be waived only after the authorized officer determines in writing how the waiver will expedite the exchange and why the public interest will be better served by the waiver.
#### National Society for the Prevention of Blindness, Inc., Appellant, v. National Council to Combat Blindness, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
**Exhibit          99.1**

| **e-FUTURE                    INFORMATION TECH INC.**    |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |   |   |   | **SCHEDULE                    II** |
| **VALUATION                    AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS** |

| **Fiscal                      Year** |   | **Description**                                    |   | **Balance at****Beginning of****Period** |      | **Charged to****Bad Debt****Expense** |   | **Written-Offs****    Charged to    ****    Allowance    ** |   | **Balance at****End of****Period** |           |
|--------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|----------------|
| **Trade Receivables**           |   |                                               |   |                                               |      |                                            |   |                                                                                                                                             |   |                                         |           |   |   |   |   |   |
| 2007                                 |   | Allowance                    for doubtful accounts |   | ¥                                             | 2,109,910 |                                            | ¥ | 1,998,090                                                                                                                                        |   | ¥                                       |  (587,898 | ) | ¥ | 4,695,898 |   |
| 2006                                 |   | Allowance                    for doubtful accounts |   |                                               | 960,682   |                                            |   | 757,516                                                                                                                                          |   |                                         | (391,712       | ) |   | 2,109,910 |   |
| 2005                                 |   | Allowance                    for doubtful accounts |   |                                               | 513,178   |                                            |   | 1,148,588                                                                                                                                        |   |                                         | 701,054        |   |   | 960,682 |   |

----
### §903. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–197, §2, Dec. 22, 1973, 87 Stat. 770, which set out definitions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 93–197, §1, Dec. 22, 1973, 87 Stat. 770, provided that Pub. L. 93–197, enacting this subchapter and repealing sections 891 to 902 of this title, could be cited as the "Menominee Restoration Act".
### §489. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 489 was editorially reclassified as section 5138 of this title.
#### § 3210.13 Who may lease or locate other minerals on the same lands as my geothermal lease?

Anyone may lease or locate other minerals on the same lands as your geothermal lease. The United States reserves the ownership of and the right to extract helium, oil, and hydrocarbon gas from all geothermal steam and associated geothermal resources. In addition, BLM allows mineral leasing or location on the same lands that are leased for geothermal resources, provided that operations under the mineral leasing or mining laws do not unreasonably interfere with or endanger your geothermal operations.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 500

 543

 509

 530

 514

 507

 508

 0

 0

 0

 0

 503

 521

 486

 492

 327

 431

 508

 545

 538

 403

 419

 437

 405

 434

 471

 506

 545

 547

 554

 468

 492

 476

 470

 478

 488

 483

 0

 0

 0

 0

 482

 485

 461

 321

 273

 330

 432

 505

 388

 369

 396

 398

 387

 382

 416

 423

 511

 517

 523

 489

 514

 489

 495

 496

 498

 492

 0

 0

 0

 0

 490

 504

 474

 438

 294

 390

 480

 532

 459

 387

 412

 418

 395

 404

 447

 452

 536

 538

 540

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 489

 1,003

 1,492

 1,987

 2,483

 2,981

 3,473

 3,473

 3,473

 3,473

 3,473

 3,963

 4,467

 4,941

 5,379

 5,673

 6,063

 6,543

 7,075

 7,534

 7,921

 8,333

 8,751

 9,146

 9,550

 9,997

 10,449

 10,985

 11,523

 12,063

 489

 502

 497

 497

 497

 497

 496

 434

 386

 347

 316

 330

 344

 353

 359

 355

 357

 364

 372

 377

 377

 379

 380

 381

 382

 385

 387

 392

 397

 402

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### § 30.230 Who pays witnesses' costs?

Interested parties who desire a witness to testify at a hearing must make their own financial and other arrangements for the witness.
#### § 3133.2 Royalties.

Royalties on oil and gas shall be at the rate specified in the notice of sale as to the tracts, if appropriate, and in the lease, unless the Secretary, in order to promote increased production on the leased area through direct, secondary or tertiary recovery means, reduces or eliminates any royalty set out in the lease.

[46 FR 55497, Nov. 9, 1981, as amended at 53 FR 17358, May 16, 1988]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 838.18

 837.88

 837.65

 837.42

 837.14

 836.88

 837.30

 837.30

 837.52

 837.74

 837.93

 838.18

 838.36

 838.55

 838.73

 838.90

 839.06

 839.22

 839.36

 839.54

 839.70

 839.87

 840.03

 840.17

 840.30

 840.41

 840.37

 840.30

 840.21

 840.16

 840.10

 46.80

 46.42

 46.14

 45.85

 45.51

 45.19

 45.71

 45.71

 45.98

 46.25

 46.48

 46.80

 47.02

 47.26

 47.49

 47.70

 47.90

 48.10

 48.28

 48.51

 48.71

 48.93

 49.13

 49.31

 49.48

 49.62

 49.57

 49.48

 49.37

 49.30

 49.22

STORAGE

-0.28

-0.37

-0.28

-0.28

-0.35

-0.32

+0.52

+0.00

+0.27

+0.27

+0.24

+0.31

+0.23

+0.24

+0.23

+0.21

+0.20

+0.20

+0.18

+0.23

+0.20

+0.22

+0.20

+0.18

+0.17

+0.14

-0.05

-0.09

-0.12

-0.07

-0.08

CHANGE

195

143

193

196

165

174

314

46

177

180

158

196

155

162

154

150

144

143

128

152

140

149

143

133

126

115

120

101

87

113

109

INFLOW

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 298

 297

 300

 300

 299

 299

 14

 14

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 114

 114

 114

 114

 114

OUTLET

 11

 10

 11

 14

 15

 11

 15

 7

 10

 13

 10

 9

 12

 12

 10

 13

 13

 10

 8

 7

 7

 10

 10

 12

 11

 14

 12

 12

 11

 12

 14

C.F.S.

 .29

 .26

 .28

 .35

 .39

 .28

 .38

 .18

 .26

 .33

 .26

 .23

 .29

 .30

 .25

 .33

 .33

 .25

 .20

 .17

 .17

 .25

 .25

 .30

 .26

 .35

 .30

 .30

 .27

 .30

 .35

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2004 RUN DATE: 06/18/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +2.15 4,661 2,571 660 346 8.71 .08

ACRE-FEET +2,150 9,245 5,100 1,309 686

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,309

OUTLET

TOTAL

 5,100

 6,409

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .08

JULY 1, 2003 23.84

 47.07

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
### §378. Partition of allotment among heirs; patents

If the Secretary of the Interior shall find that any inherited trust allotment or allotments are capable of partition to the advantage of the heirs, he may cause such lands to be partitioned among them, regardless of their competency, patents in fee to be issued to the competent heirs for their shares and trust patents to be issued to the incompetent heirs for the lands respectively or jointly set apart to them, the trust period to terminate in accordance with the terms of the original patent or order of extension of the trust period set out in said patent.

(May 18, 1916, ch. 125, §1, 39 Stat. 127.)
### §797. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–281, §1(b)(1), May 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 246

Section, act Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 843, §7, 70 Stat. 894, provided for applicability of probate laws to property of deceased members.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50067 Summary Calendar

ROBERT F. NAYLOR, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

AMERICAN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

EP-99-CV-369-DB

August 10, 2000

Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

On April 10, 1998, Robert Naylor commenced an action against American

Science & Engineering (AS&E) asserting claims for discriminatory treatment,

hostile work environment and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (1994). The district court held that Naylor failed1 Naylor v. American Science & Engineering , No. 99-50257 (October 28, 1999).

2 United States v. Shanbaum , 10 F.3d 305 (5 th Cir. 1994).

3 Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc. , 836 F.2d 866 (5 th Cir. 1988).

2 to establish a genuine issue of materia l fact as to any of the claims, and we

affirmed. 1

On November 4, 1999, Naylor filed a second action against AS&E, asserting

claims of intentional discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and tortious

interference with his prospective employment under Texas law. The district court

found that Naylor’s claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata and

appropriately dismissed the action. Our review of the record and the briefs

submitted b y the parties persuades us of the correctness of the district court’s

dismissal. 2 We find no abuse of discretion in the imposition of sanctions by the

district court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. 3

A S&E seeks sanctions against Naylor for this appeal; Naylor moves f o r

sanctions agains t AS&E. Naylor’s motion is DENIED. AS&E’s motion for

sanctions, including attorney’s fees, is GRANTED and such inclusive sanctions are

set at $5000. Naylor is cast for all costs of this appeal.

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
§ 3604.24 Who may remove materials on my behalf? ( a ) You may allow your agent to extract mineral materials under your free use permit.
( b ) Your agent may charge you only for extraction services and must not— ( 1 ) Charge you for the materials extracted, processed, or removed; or
( 2 ) Take mineral materials from the permit area as payment for services rendered to you, or as a donation or gift.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of Directors


Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.




We consent to the incorporation by reference of our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 10, 2011 on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity (deficiency), and cash flows for the two year period ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 included in this Form 10-K, into the Company’s previously filed S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 333-101447).





/s/ Choi, Kim, Park, LLPLos Angeles, CaliforniaMarch 15, 2011
### §290i–7. Jurisdiction of United States courts

For the purposes of any civil action which may be brought within the United States, its territories or possessions, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, by or against the Bank in accordance with the agreement, the Bank shall be deemed to be an inhabitant of the Federal judicial district in which its principal office within the United States or its agent appointed for the purpose of accepting service or notice of service is located, and any such action to which the Bank shall be a party shall be deemed to arise under the laws of the United States, and the district courts of the United States, including the courts enumerated in section 460 of title 28, shall have original jurisdiction of any such action. When the Bank is defendant in any action in a State court, it may at any time before the trial thereof remove the action into the appropriate district court of the United States by following the procedure for removal provided in section 1446 of title 28.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title XIII, §1339, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 742.)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending  September 30, 2019 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures
Inc.





|Date: April 11, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|-------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                     |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
# Journal officiel C 249I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l’Union européenne | C 249I |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 63e année29 juillet 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l’Union européenne

C 249I

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

63e année29 juillet 2020

---

| Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informations |
| | INFORMATIONS PROVENANT DES INSTITUTIONS, ORGANES ET ORGANISMES DE L'UNION EUROPÉENNE |
| | Conseil |
| 2020/C 249 I/01 | Adoption de modifications du règlement intérieur d’Eurojust | 1 |

Sommaire

page

IV   Informations

INFORMATIONS PROVENANT DES INSTITUTIONS, ORGANES ET ORGANISMES DE L'UNION EUROPÉENNE

Conseil

2020/C 249 I/01

Adoption de modifications du règlement intérieur d’Eurojust

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

IV Informations

INFORMATIONS PROVENANT DES INSTITUTIONS, ORGANES ET ORGANISMES DE L'UNION EUROPÉENNE

Conseil

| 29.7.2020 | FR | Journal officiel de l’Union européenne | CI 249/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2020

FR

Journal officiel de l’Union européenne

CI 249/1

---

Adoption de modifications du règlement intérieur d’Eurojust

(2020/C 249 I/01)

Le 24 juillet 2020, le collège d’Eurojust a adopté des modifications du règlement intérieur d’Eurojust (1). Ces modifications sont annexées à la décision d’exécution (UE) 2020/1114 du Conseil du 23 juillet 2020 (2).

Par le Collège d’Eurojust,

Ladislav HAMRAN

Président d’Eurojust

---

(1)  Approuvé par le Conseil par la décision d’exécution (UE) 2019/2250 du 19 décembre 2019 (JO L 336 du 30.12.2019, p. 309) et arrêté par le Collège le 20 décembre 2019 (JO L 50 du 24.2.2020, p. 1).

1

(2)  JO L 244 du 29.7.2020, p. 13

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard Denoyer, Senior Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



March 31, 2010

/s/ BERNARD DENOYER Bernard Denoyer Senior Vice President, Finance


---



QuickLinks
#### § 3742.3-4 Proof of publication.

After the period of newspaper publication has expired, the person requesting publication shall obtain from the office of the newspaper of publication, a sworn statement[1] that the notice was published at the time and in accordance with the requirements under these regulations of this part, and shall file such sworn statement in the office where the Request for Publication was filed.

###### Footnotes -
  3742.3-4

[1] 18 U.S.C. 1001 makes it a crime for any person knowingly and willfully to make to any department or agency of the United States any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations as to any matter within its jurisdiction.
§ 30.419 What happens after the successful bidder submits payment? When the judge is notified by BIA that BIA has received payment, the judge will issue an order: ( a ) Approving the sale and stating that title must transfer as of the date the order becomes final; and
( b ) For the sale of an interest subject to a life estate, directing allocation of the proceeds of the sale and accrued income among the holder of the life estate and the holders of any remainder interests using 25 CFR part 179.
COYOTE LAKE

SAN LUIS RES

LOS

BANOS RES

SAN JUSTO RESERVOIR

SAN FELIPE LAKE

RI VER

SALINAS

RIV ER

RIVER BENITO

S AN

S. FORK LOS BANOS CREEK

LITTLE PA NOCHE CREEK

SILVER

CR E EK

PANOCHE

CREEK

WARTHAN

HERNANDEZ

RESERVOIR

UVAS RESERVOIR

O`NEILL FOREBAY

RIV ER

HORN SLOUGH

Santa Clara Conduit

Hollister Conduit

Pachec o Conduit

Outside Canal

California Aqueduct/San Luis Canal

Arr oyo Canal

MMOONNTTEERREEYY CCOO

SSAANN BBEENNIITTOO CCOO

MMEERRCCEEDD CCOO

FFRREESSNNOO CCOO

SSAANNTTAA CCLLAARRAA CCOO

SSAANNTTAA CCRRUUZZ CCOO

MMAADDEERRAA CCOO

§ ̈¦5

·|}ÿ152

·|}ÿ25

·|}ÿ198

·|}ÿ146

·|}ÿ33

·|}ÿ156

·|}ÿ165

·|}ÿ129

·|}ÿ1

·|}ÿ68

·|}ÿ183

·|}ÿ146

·|}ÿ156

£¤101

£¤101

San Benito Co. W.D.

San Benito Co W.D. Contract No. 8-07-20-W0130A

Exhibit A

"

0 10 20

Miles

San Benito Co. WD Boundary

San Benito Co. CVP Service Area

Consolidated Place of Use

921-202-6 Date: June 27, 2006, Revised 7/18/06

File Name: N:\Districts\Contracts\SantaClaraSanBenitoJoint\SanBenito.mxd