alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 683.290 Are there salary and bonus restrictions in place for the use of title I of Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act and Wagner-Peyser Act funds? ( a ) No funds available under title I of WIOA or the Wagner-Peyser Act may be used by a recipient or subrecipient of such funds to pay the salary and bonuses of an individual, either as direct costs or indirect costs, at a rate in excess of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level II of the Executive Schedule under 5 U.S.C. 5313, which can be found at *https://www.opm.gov/*.
( b ) In instances where funds awarded under title I of WIOA or the Wagner-Peyser Act pay only a portion of the salary or bonus, the WIOA title I or Wagner-Peyser Act funds may only be charged for the share of the employee's salary or bonus attributable to the work performed on the WIOA title I or Wagner-Peyser Act grant. That portion cannot exceed the proportional Executive level II rate. The restriction applies to the sum of salaries and bonuses charged as either direct costs or indirect costs under title I of WIOA and the Wagner-Peyser Act.
( c ) The limitation described in paragraph (a) of this section will not apply to contractors (as defined in 2 CFR 200.23) providing goods and services. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.330, characteristics indicative of contractor are the following: ( 1 ) Provides the goods and services within normal business operations;
( 2 ) Provides similar goods or services to many different purchasers;
( 3 ) Normally operates in a competitive environment;
( 4 ) Provides goods or services that are ancillary to the operation of the Federal program; and
( 5 ) Is not subject to compliance requirements of the Federal program as a result of the agreement, though similar requirements may apply for other reasons.
( d ) If a State is a recipient of such funds, the State may establish a lower limit than is provided in paragraph (a) of this section for salaries and bonuses of those receiving salaries and bonuses from a subrecipient of such funds, taking into account factors including the relative cost of living in the State, the compensation levels for comparable State or local government employees, and the size of the organizations that administer the Federal programs involved.
( e ) When an individual is working for the same recipient or subrecipient in multiple offices that are funded by title I of WIOA or the Wagner-Peyser Act, the recipient or subrecipient must ensure that the sum of the individual's salary and bonus does not exceed the prescribed limit in paragraph (a) of this section.
§ 3833.22 How do I amend my location? ( a ) You must record an amended location certificate or notice with BLM within 90 days after you record the amended notice or certificate in the local recording office. BLM will not recognize any amendment to your mining claim until you file it properly.
( b ) You must pay a processing fee for each claim or site you amend. See the table of fees and service charges in § 3830.21 of this chapter.
( c ) An amended location notice or certificate relates back to the original location date. The amendment takes effect when you record it with the local recording office under state law or such other time as provided by state law.
[68 FR 61071, Oct. 24, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 58879, Oct. 7, 2005]
### Subpart B—Life Insurance Gross Income

Sec.
803.
Life insurance gross income.
#### Charles Mederer and Elizabeth Mederer, Appellants, v. Andrew J. Van Siclen and Others, as Executors, etc., Respondents.

Judgement affirmed, *873with costs. ¡No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, ¡Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
### §941j. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–116, §12, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1133, which related to transfer of existing reservation to the United States as trustee for the tribe and expansion of reservation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 50177 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RODOLFO RAFAEL OLIVAS

- LOZANO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 239

- 1

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Rodolfo Rafael Olivas

- Lozano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Olivas

- Lozano h a s not f iled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 2, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-50177 Document: 00514664878 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/02/2018No. 18

- 50177

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-50177 Document: 00514664878 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/02/2018
#### Gerty T. Cori, Respondent, v. Paul Sonnenschein, Defendant, and J. Sonnenschein Hop Co., Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant-appellant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONTRACT ARTICLES ARE INCLUDED IN LONGTERM CONTRACTS:

Revised Standard Contract Article 17 Pertaining to Contracts Conveying Irrigation

Benefits

Assignment Limited%Successors and Assigns Obligated

Books, Records, and Reports

Changes in Contractor’s Organization

Compliance with Civil Rights Laws and Regulations

Confirmation of Contract

Contingent Upon Appropriation or Allotment of Funds

Equal Opportunity

General Obligation%Benefits Conditioned Upon Payment

Notices

Officials Not to Benefit

Privacy Act Compliance

Water and Air Pollution Control
§ 3737.1 Mining claim and millsite use. ( a ) The Act in section 6 provides as follows: Notwithstanding any other provisions of this act, all mining claims and mill sites or mineral rights located under the terms of this act or otherwise contained on the public lands as described in section 2 shall be used only for the purposes specified in section 2 and no facility or activity shall be erected or conducted thereon for other purposes.
( b ) Under this section, a mining claim or millsite may not be used for purposes other than for legitimate mining and milling. The claimant, therefore, may not erect on the mining claim any facility or activity such as filling stations, curio shops, cafes, tourist or hunting and fishing lodges, or conduct such businesses thereon.
[35 FR 9738, June 13, 1970]
§ 3809.554 How do I estimate the cost to reclaim my operations? ( a ) You must estimate the cost to reclaim your operations as if BLM were hiring a third-party contractor to perform reclamation of your operations after you have vacated the project area. Your estimate must include BLM's cost to administer the reclamation contract. Contact BLM to obtain this administrative cost information.
( b ) Your estimate of the cost to reclaim your operations must be acceptable to BLM.
**Exhibit 15.3**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No 333-169514) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-165065, 333-165566, 333-169272, 333-171231 and 333-172069) of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV of our report dated April 14, 2010,relating to the financial statements of the Anheuser-Busch US Beer and Packaging reporting entities as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, and our report dated June 26, 2009, relating to the financial statement of Anheuser-BuschCompanies, Inc. as of December 31, 2008, both of which reports appear in Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010. The financial statements of the Anheuser-Busch US Beer andPackaging reporting entities and of Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. are not separately presented in Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV’s annual report on Form 20-F. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

St. Louis, MO 

April 12, 2011
#### § 3582.1 Other applicable regulations.
Exhibit 32.2

                  Certification Pursuant to
                   18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                   as Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


          In connection with the Annual Report of Myoffiz,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10K-SB/A for the period ended
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jaren Chan Eng Ann,
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                              By /s/  Jaren Chan Eng Ann
                                -------------------------
                              Jaren Chan Eng Ann
                              Chief Executive Officer


March 15, 2004
#### Charles L. Andrews, Respondent, v. Travelers Insurance Company, Appellant.

All concur.
### §640d–19. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §20, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1722, which provided for perpetual use of Cliff Spring by the Hopi Tribe as a shrine for religious ceremonial purposes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: S.E., A MINOR

PETITION OF: S.E., A MINOR :

:

:

:

: No. 3 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of June, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### § 21.8 Appeals.

Any determination made pursuant to any of the provisions of this part may be appealed to the Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals, in accordance with the general rules set forth in subpart B of part 4 of this title and the special procedural rules in subpart G of part 4 of this title, applicable to proceedings in appeals cases which do not lie within the appellate jurisdiction of an established Appeals Board of the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

[36 FR 7206, Apr. 15, 1971]
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34055 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34056 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34057 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34058 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34059 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34060 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34061 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34062 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34063 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34064 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34065 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34066 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34067 1986
### §5352. General education contract and grant provisions and requirements; school district quality and standards of excellence

No funds from any grant or contract pursuant to this subchapter shall be made available to any school district unless the Secretary is satisfied that the quality and standard of education, including facilities and auxiliary services, for Indian students enrolled in the schools of such district are at least equal to that provided all other students from resources, other than resources provided in this subchapter, available to the local school district.

(Pub. L. 93–638, title II, §205, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 93–638, known as the Indian Education Assistance Act, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 458a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §788g. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–506, §3, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 859, which related to distribution of judgment funds to heirs of deceased enrollees, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3597.1 Books of account. ( a ) Operators/lessees shall maintain records which show a correct account of all ore and rock mined, of all ore put through the processing plant, of all mineral products produced and of all ore and mineral products sold. The records shall show all relevant quality analyses of ore minded, processed or sold and the percentage of the mineral products recovered or lost.
( b ) Production records shall be made available for examination by the authorized officer during regular business hours. For the purpose of production verification, the authorized office may request, and the operator/lessee shall submit a copy of any portion of the production records not submitted to the Minerals Management Service as part of the operator's/lessee's production reporting.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 28, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-30796

 

DANNY M. FRILOUX,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(01-CV-2041)

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Friloux challenges the termination of his long-term disability

benefits after he received the benefits for several months during

2000, claiming: (1) the district court failed to give enough

weight to the Social Security Administration’s finding of

disability; (2) the district court erred in applying the “national

economy” employment standard; and (3) the evidence in the record
2

demonstrates that UNUM abused its discretion by discontinuing the

benefits. 

Friloux conceded at oral argument that the plan provides that

the “national economy” standard shall be used. In any event,

having heard oral argument, having reviewed the briefs and

pertinent parts of the record, and essentially for the reasons

stated by the district court, the discontinuance of benefits is

AFFIRMED.
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended Annual Report of Whistler Investments,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mehboob
Charania, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

                                             /s/Mehboob Charania
                                            ----------------------
                                            Mehboob Charania
                                            Chief Financial Officer
October 4, 2004
### Subpart C—Recordkeeping and Registration by Dealers

Sec.
5121.
Recordkeeping by wholesale dealers.
5122.
Recordkeeping by retail dealers.
5123.
Preservation and inspection of records, and entry of premises for inspection.
5124.
Registration by dealers.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subpart C was redesignated subpart A of this part.

Another prior subpart C, consisting of sections 5101 to 5106, related to manufacturers of stills, prior to the general revision of this subpart by Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §451(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 818.

Another prior subpart C, consisting of sections 5101 to 5106, related to manufacturers of stills, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

#### Amendments

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–59, title XI, §11125(b)(4), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1954, added subpart heading and items 5121 to 5124.
§ 3217.14 When will BLM approve my drilling or development contract? BLM may approve a drilling or development contract when: ( a ) One or more geothermal lessees enter into the contract with one or more persons; or
( b ) Lessees need the contract for regional exploration of geothermal resources;
( c ) BLM has coordinated the review of the proposed contract with appropriate state agencies; and
( d ) BLM determines that approval best serves or is necessary for the conservation of natural resources, public convenience or necessity, or the interests of the United States.
1 

### Jeng, Terry

From: Law, Preston

Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 1:24 PM

To: ATroutwine@Polsinelli.com

Subject: NPL Listing Inquiry for Iowa-Nebraska Light and Power Co

Attachments: Fw: Centel/Norfolk FMGP Site

Mr. Troutwine,

My name is Preston Law and I serve as the National Priorities List (NPL) Coordinator in Region 7. Since we are in the 60

‐ day comment period for the proposed NPL listing, I will respond to your e

‐ mail sent to Barbara Peterson on 11/10/2015

(see attached).

The Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) is a state led program. Processes involving the VCP should be discussed with the

state. Once the state notifies Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of a successful enrollment into the VCP, EPA will

take it under consideration. Until that time, EPA will proceed with the NPL listing process.

Thanks,

Preston Law

Remedial Project Manager

USEPA

‐ R7 SUPR/SPEB

11201 Renner Blvd

Lenexa, KS 66219

(913) 551

‐ 7097
§ 2884.19 Where do I file my application for a grant or TUP? ( a ) If BLM has exclusive jurisdiction over the lands involved, file your application with the BLM Field Office having jurisdiction over the lands described in the application.
( b ) If another Federal agency has exclusive jurisdiction over the land involved, file your application with that agency and refer to its regulations for its requirements.
( c ) If there are no BLM-administered lands involved, but the lands are under the jurisdiction of two or more Federal agencies, you may file your application at the BLM office in the vicinity of the pipeline. BLM will notify you where to direct future communications about the pipeline.
( d ) If two or more Federal agencies, including BLM, have jurisdiction over the lands in the application, file it at any BLM office having jurisdiction over a portion of the Federal lands. BLM will notify you where to direct future communications about the pipeline.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-CV-21843-COOKE/GOODMAN

GINETTE LUXAMA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a 

municipality governed under the 

laws of the State of Florida,

Defendant.

______________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Ginette Luxama, through her counsel, in accordance with the parties’ 

mediated settlement agreement, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, dismisses this action against the Defendant, the City of Miami Beach. The 

Defendant has not served an answer or a motion for summary judgment in this action.1

Dated: March 18, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Marc A. Burton

Richard J. Burton, Esq., F.B.N. 179337

Marc A. Burton, Esq., F.B.N. 95318

THE BURTON FIRM, P.A.

2875 N.E. 191st Street, Suite 403

Aventura, FL 33180

Phone: (305) 705-0888 | Fax: (305) 705-0008

rb@theburtonfirm.com

mburton@theburtonfirm.com

pleadings@theburtonfirm.com

1 “The fact that Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss . . . does not prevent Plaintiff 

from voluntarily dismissing his [or her] claims pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i).” Maietta v. 

Saul, 220CV00453JLBNPM, 2020 WL 5759184, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 2020).

Case 1:20-cv-21843-MGC Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/18/2021 Page 1 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 18, 2021, I filed the foregoing document using 

the CM/ECF system, which sent a copy of this document to all counsel of record identified 

on the Service List below.

By: /s/ Marc A. Burton

Marc A. Burton, F.B.N. 95318

Case 1:20-cv-21843-MGC Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/18/2021 Page 2 of 3
SERVICE LIST

THE BURTON FIRM, P.A.

Counsel for Plaintiff Ginette Luxama

Richard J. Burton, Esq.

Marc A. Burton, Esq.

2875 N.E. 191 Street, Suite 403

Aventura, Florida 33180

P: 305-705-0888 | F: 305-705-0008

pleadings@theburtonfirm.com

rb@theburtonfirm.com

mburton@theburtonfirm.com

CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

CITY OF MIAMI BEACH

Robert Rosenwald, Esq.

Counsel for Defendant City of Miami Beach

1700 Convention Center Drive

Fourth Floor – Legal Department

Miami Beach, Florida 33139

P: (305) 673-7470 | F: (305) 673-7002

robertrosenwald@miamibeachfl.gov

Case 1:20-cv-21843-MGC Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/18/2021 Page 3 of 3
### **Subchapter C—Operation of Distilled Spirits Plants**

Part
I.
General provisions.
II.
Operations on bonded premises.
[III.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter C, Internal Revenue Bonded Warehouses, consisted of part I, Establishment, and part II, Operation, and consisted of sections 5231 to 5233 and 5241 to 5252, respectively, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

#### Amendments

**1979**—Pub. L. 96–39, title VIII, §807(b)(5), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 290, struck out item relating to Part III "Operations on bottling premises" in table of parts comprising subchapter C.
### **CHAPTER 99—COAL INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFITS**

Subchapter
Sec. 1
A.
Definitions of general applicability
9701
B.
Combined benefit fund
9702
C.
Health benefits of certain miners
9711
D.
Other provisions
9721