alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Myoffiz, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10K-SB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Chang, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By   /s/  Michael Chang

Michael Chang

Chief Financial Officer





September 22, 2004
Docket Number FAA-2012-0641
#### § 3141.62 Publication of a notice of competitive lease offering.

*Combined Hydrocarbon Leases, Tar Sand Leases or Oil and Gas Leases.* At least 45 days prior to conducting a competitive auction, lands to be offered for a competitive lease sale, as in a Notice of Competitive Lease Sale, will be made available to the public. The notice will specify the time and place of sale; the manner in which the bids may be submitted; the description of the lands; the terms and conditions of the lease, including the royalty and rental rates; the amount of the minimum bid; and will state that the terms and conditions of the leases are available for inspection and designate the proper BLM office where bid forms may be obtained.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21979]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending September 
17, 2004

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: OST-2004-19112.
    Date Filed: September 13, 2004.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

PTC1 0300 dated 20 August 2004
TC1 Areawide Resolutions r1-r3, PTC1 0301 dated 20 August 2004
TC1 Caribbean Resolutions r4-r16
TC1 0302 dated 20 August 2004
TC1 Longhaul (except USA-Chile, Panama) Resolutions r17-r55
TC1 0303 dated 20 August 2004
TC1 Longhaul USA-Chile, Panama Resolutions r56-r70
PTC1 0304 dated 20 August 2004
TC1 Within South America Resolutions r71-r82

    Intended effective date: 1 November 2004/1 January 2005.

Andrea M. Jenkins,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 04-21979 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsModeling of crack bridging in a unidirectional metal matrix compositeThe effective fatigue crack driving force and crack opening profiles were determined analytically for fatigue tested unidirectional composite specimens exhibiting fiber bridging. The crack closure pressure due to bridging was modeled using two approaches; the fiber pressure model and the shear lag model. For both closure models, the Bueckner weight function method and the finite element method were used to calculate crack opening displacements and the crack driving force. The predicted near crack tip opening profile agreed well with the experimentally measured profiles for single edge notch SCS-6/Ti-15-3 metal matrix composite specimens. The numerically determined effective crack driving force, Delta K(sup eff), was calculated using both models to correlate the measure crack growth rate in the composite. The calculated Delta K(sup eff) from both models accounted for the crack bridging by showing a good agreement between the measured fatigue crack growth rates of the bridged composite and that of unreinforced, unbridged titanium matrix alloy specimens.Document ID19910015346Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGhosn, Louis J.*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Brook Park OH., United States)*Kantzos, Pete*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Telesman, Jack*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1991Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberE-6142NAS 1.15:104355NASA-TM-104355Accession Number91N24660Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 510-01-50Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910015346.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K of Liquidmetal TechnologiesIncorporated (the Company) for the period ended December 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tony Chung, Vice President of Finance of theCompany, certify pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that :

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Date: March 28, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Tony Chung            |   |
|--------|----------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |                 |   |
|   |                 |   | Tony Chung                |
|   |                 |   | Vice President of Finance |
|        |                      |        |                           |        |  |

 

----
#### Ira Grobe v. Max Kramer.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1225

STEVEN PAUL FLEMING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-97-700-WMN)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Paul Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Tamera Lynn Fine, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Paul Fleming appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action challenging the Federal Aviation Administration’s denial of medical certification to fly. See 14 C.F.R.

§ 61.3(c) (1997). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fleming v. United

States, No. CA-97-700-WMN (D. Md. Jan 21, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1552-DR]


Puerto Rico; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-1552-DR), dated September 17, 2004, 
and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 19, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective September 19, 2004.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-22065 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
### §1915. Placement of Indian children

#### (a) Adoptive placements; preferences

In any adoptive placement of an Indian child under State law, a preference shall be given, in the absence of good cause to the contrary, to a placement with (1) a member of the child's extended family; (2) other members of the Indian child's tribe; or (3) other Indian families.

#### (b) Foster care or preadoptive placements; criteria; preferences

Any child accepted for foster care or preadoptive placement shall be placed in the least restrictive setting which most approximates a family and in which his special needs, if any, may be met. The child shall also be placed within reasonable proximity to his or her home, taking into account any special needs of the child. In any foster care or preadoptive placement, a preference shall be given, in the absence of good cause to the contrary, to a placement with—

(i) a member of the Indian child's extended family;

(ii) a foster home licensed, approved, or specified by the Indian child's tribe;

(iii) an Indian foster home licensed or approved by an authorized non-Indian licensing authority; or

(iv) an institution for children approved by an Indian tribe or operated by an Indian organization which has a program suitable to meet the Indian child's needs.

#### (c) Tribal resolution for different order of preference; personal preference considered; anonymity in application of preferences

In the case of a placement under subsection (a) or (b) of this section, if the Indian child's tribe shall establish a different order of preference by resolution, the agency or court effecting the placement shall follow such order so long as the placement is the least restrictive setting appropriate to the particular needs of the child, as provided in subsection (b) of this section. Where appropriate, the preference of the Indian child or parent shall be considered: Provided, That where a consenting parent evidences a desire for anonymity, the court or agency shall give weight to such desire in applying the preferences.

#### (d) Social and cultural standards applicable

The standards to be applied in meeting the preference requirements of this section shall be the prevailing social and cultural standards of the Indian community in which the parent or extended family resides or with which the parent or extended family members maintain social and cultural ties.

#### (e) Record of placement; availability

A record of each such placement, under State law, of an Indian child shall be maintained by the State in which the placement was made, evidencing the efforts to comply with the order of preference specified in this section. Such record shall be made available at any time upon the request of the Secretary or the Indian child's tribe.

(Pub. L. 95–608, title I, §105, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3073.)
§ 3473.1-2 Where submitted. ( a ) ( 1 ) All first-year rentals and the first-year portions of all bonuses for leases issued under Group 3400 of this title shall be paid to the Bureau of Land Management State office having jurisdiction over the lands (43 CFR subpart 1821).
( 2 ) All second-year and subsequent rentals and deferred bonus amounts payable after the initial payment for leases shall be paid to the Service.
( b ) All royalties on producing leases, all payments under leases in their minimum production period, and all advance royalties shall be paid to the Service.
[49 FR 11638, Mar. 27, 1984, as amended at 49 FR 39330, Oct. 5, 1984]
(May 17, 1948.)

#### Sylvia Benintendi, Respondent, v. Marie Benintendi, as Administratrix of the Estate of James V. Benintendi, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to-the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 969.]
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON DC 

MARK SMITH, ET AL., 

Complainants 

v. 

CITY OF SANTA MONICA, 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER 

FAA Docket No. 16-16-02 

On June 1, 2016, counsel for Respondent, City of Santa Monica, filed a Motion under 

14 C.F.R. § 16.19(e), requesting an extension of time until July 1, 2016, to file its Answer 

to the Complaint. 

Counsel advised that additional time is needed to prepare an adequate response. Counsel 

advised that Complainants do not oppose an extension. 

Parties may file a written motion for an extension oftime. 14 C.F.R. § 16.19(e). The 

Director may issue an order extending any time period prescribed where necessary or 

appropriate for a fair and complete consideration of matters before the agency. 14 C.F.R. 

§ 16.ll(a). 

An extension of time is reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, Respondent's 

motion is hereby GRANTED. The Answer to the Complaint is now due on July 1, 2016. 

Complainants may then file a Reply within ten days of the date of service of the Answer. 

Robin K. Hunt 

Acting Director, Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

Date ; I 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 10, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States 

mail (first class, postage paid) a true copy of the foregoing ORDER addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainants 

Richard K. Simon 

1700 Decker School Lane 

Malibu, CA 90265 

Counsel for Respondent 

Marsha Moutrie 

City Attorney 

City of Santa Monica 

1685 Main Street Room 210 

Santa Monica, CA 9040 I 

Scott P. Lewis 

Anderson & Kreiger LLP 

1 Canal Park Suite 200 

Cambridge, MA 02141 

Copies to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) 

FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (AC0-100) 

Electronic Docket (www.regulations.gov): FAA-2016-3830 

Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     BIO-CHEM, INC. September 30, 1996 financial statements  and is qualified in
     its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894562
<NAME>                        BIO-CHEM, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                                              50,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    50,000
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      50,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,100
<OTHER-SE>                                          48,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        50,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
### §201. Penalties; how recovered

All penalties which shall accrue under title 28 of the Revised Statutes shall be sued for and recovered in an action in the nature of an action of debt, in the name of the United States, before any court having jurisdiction of the same, in any State or Territory in which the defendant shall be arrested or found, the one half to the use of the informer and the other half to the use of the United States, except when the prosecution shall be first instituted on behalf of the United States, in which case the whole shall be to their use.

(R.S. §2124.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Title 28 of the Revised Statutes, referred to in text, was in the original "this Title", meaning title 28 of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§2039 to 2157. For complete classification of R.S. §§2039 to 2157 to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

R.S. §2124 derived from act June 30, 1834, ch. 161, §27, 4 Stat. 733.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 832.00

 831.62

 831.12

 830.68

 830.19

 829.74

 829.25

 828.75

 828.57

 828.53

 828.53

 828.55

 828.53

 828.51

 828.48

 828.45

 828.45

 828.46

 828.46

 828.46

 828.44

 828.43

 828.43

 828.43

 828.42

 828.41

 828.39

 828.38

 828.38

 828.37

 828.35

 39.44

 39.01

 38.45

 37.96

 37.41

 36.92

 36.39

 35.85

 35.65

 35.61

 35.61

 35.63

 35.61

 35.59

 35.56

 35.53

 35.53

 35.54

 35.54

 35.54

 35.52

 35.51

 35.51

 35.51

 35.49

 35.48

 35.46

 35.45

 35.45

 35.44

 35.42

STORAGE

-0.50

-0.43

-0.56

-0.49

-0.54

-0.49

-0.53

-0.54

-0.19

-0.04

+0.00

+0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.03

-0.03

+0.00

+0.01

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

-0.01

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

+0.00

-0.01

-0.02

CHANGE

8

49

-22

14

-15

12

0

-6

31

51

41

51

34

34

32

28

48

52

45

43

32

39

43

43

38

38

31

36

41

35

31

INFLOW

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 244

 246

 246

 245

 243

 244

 252

 250

 113

 56

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

OUTLET

 8

 8

 6

 6

 6

 7

 7

 6

 5

 6

 6

 5

 5

 5

 8

 4

 8

 6

 5

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 4

 4

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

C.F.S.

 .22

 .21

 .18

 .17

 .18

 .19

 .21

 .17

 .15

 .18

 .18

 .16

 .15

 .15

 .22

 .12

 .22

 .18

 .14

 .08

 .10

 .12

 .10

 .09

 .12

 .11

 .05

 .07

 .02

 .04

 .05

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .15

 .13

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

OCTOBER 2005 RUN DATE: 03/14/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -4.49 937 2,609 460 149 4.33 .31

ACRE-FEET -4,490 1,859 5,175 912 296

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 912

OUTLET

TOTAL

 5,175

 6,087

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .31

JULY 1, 2005 .31

 39.94

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
### Subpart F—Controlled Foreign Corporations

Sec.
951.
Amounts included in gross income of United States shareholders.
951A.
Global intangible low-taxed income included in gross income of United States shareholders.
952.
Subpart F income defined.
953.
Insurance income.
954.
Foreign base company income.
[955.
Repealed.]
956.
Investment of earnings in United States property.
[956A.
Repealed.]
957.
Controlled foreign corporations; United States persons.
958.
Rules for determining stock ownership.
959.
Exclusion from gross income of previously taxed earnings and profits.
960.
Deemed paid credit for subpart F inclusions.
961.
Adjustments to basis of stock in controlled foreign corporations and of other property.
962.
Election by individuals to be subject to tax at corporate rates.
[963.
Repealed.]
964.
Miscellaneous provisions.
965.
Treatment of deferred foreign income upon transition to participation exemption system of taxation.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §§14103(b), 14201(c), 14212(b)(6), 14301(c)(39), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2208, 2213, 2217, 2225, added item 951A, substituted "Deemed paid credit for subpart F inclusions" for "Special rules for foreign tax credit" in item 960 and "Treatment of deferred foreign income upon transition to participation exemption system of taxation" for "Temporary dividends received deduction" in item 965, and struck out item 955 "Withdrawal of previously excluded subpart F income from qualified investment".

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title IV, §422(c), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1519, added item 965.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §1501(c), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1826, which directed that the analysis for subpart F be amended by striking item 956A, could not be executed, because item 956A "Earnings invested in excess passive assets" had been editorially supplied.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XII, §1221(b)(3)(E), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2553, substituted "Insurance income" for "Income from insurance of United States risks" in item 953.

**1975**—Pub. L. 94–12, title VI, §602(a)(3)(A), (c)(7), (d)(3)(B), Mar. 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 58, 60, 64, struck out existing item 955 and replaced it with an identical item 955 and struck out item 963 "Receipt of minimum distributions by domestic corporations".

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–834, §12(a), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 1006, added heading of subpart F, and items 951–964.