alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 17.333 Investigation. ( a ) *Informal investigation.* ( 1 ) DOI will investigate complaints that are unresolved after mediation or are reopened because of a violation of a mediation agreement.
( 2 ) As part of the initial investigation, DOI will use informal fact finding methods, including joint or separate discussions with the complainant and recipient to establish the facts, and, if possible, settle the complaint on terms that are mutually agreeable to the parties. DOI may seek the assistance of any involved State agency.
( 3 ) DOI will put any agreement in writing and have it signed by the parties and an authorized official at DOI.
( 4 ) The settlement shall not affect the operation of any other enforcement effort of DOI, including compliance reviews and investigation of other complaints which may involve the recipient.
( 5 ) The settlement is not a finding of discrimination against a recipient.
( b ) *Formal investigation.* If DOI cannot resolve the complaint through informal means, it will develop formal findings through further investigation of the complaint. If the investigation indicates a violation of these regulations, DOI will attempt to obtain voluntary compliance. If DOI cannot obtain voluntary compliance, it will begin enforcement as described in § 17.335.
#### Helga Hunter, Appellant, v. Victor Moore, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1

              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-XXXXXX) and related Prospectus of
Aphton Corporation for the registration of 13,769,048 shares of its common stock
and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated March 26,
2003, with respect to the financial statements of Aphton Corporation included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
May 28, 2003
#### § 3452.1-3 Acceptance.

The effective date of the lease relinquishment shall, upon approval by an authorized officer, be the date on which the lessee filed the lease relinquishment. No relinquishment shall be approved until the authorized officer determines that the relinquishment will not impair the public interest, that the accrued rentals and royalties have been paid and that all the obligations of the lessee under the regulations and terms of the lease have been met.

[47 FR 33147, July 30, 1982]
§ 3172.13 Variances from minimum standards. ( a ) An operator may request the authorized officer to approve a variance from any of the minimum standards prescribed in §§ 3172.6 through 3172.12. All such requests shall be submitted in writing to the appropriate authorized officer and provide information as to the circumstances which warrant approval of the variance(s) requested and the proposed alternative methods by which the related minimum standard(s) are to be satisfied. The authorized officer, after considering all relevant factors, if appropriate, may approve the requested variance(s) if it is determined that the proposed alternative(s) meet or exceed the objectives of the applicable minimum standard(s).
( b ) Emergency or other situations of an immediate nature that could not be reasonably foreseen at the time of APD approval may receive oral approval. However, such requests shall be followed up by a written notice filed not later than the fifth business day following oral approval.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-393), the Boise and Payette National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting, which is open to the public.

# DATES:

Wednesday, October 20, 2004, beginning at 10:30 a.m.

      ( print page 59185)    

# ADDRESSES:

Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Building, 3100 South Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics will include review and approval of project proposals, and it is an open public forum.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Doug Gochnour, Designated Federal Officer, at (202) 392-6681 or e-mail                         *dgochnour@fs.fed.us.*

Dated: September 28, 2004.

Richard A. Smith,

Forest Supervisor, Boise National Forest.

[FR Doc. 04-22257 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFeasibility analysis of cislunar flight using the Shuttle OrbiterA first order orbital mechanics analysis was conducted to examine the possibility of utilizing the Space Shuttle Orbiter to perform payload delivery missions to lunar orbit. In the analysis, the earth orbit of departure was constrained to be that of Space Station Freedom. Furthermore, no enhancements of the Orbiter's thermal protection system were assumed. Therefore, earth orbit insertion maneuvers were constrained to be all propulsive. Only minimal constraints were placed on the lunar orbits and no consideration was given to possible landing sites for lunar surface payloads. The various phases and maneuvers of the mission are discussed for both a conventional (Apollo type) and an unconventional mission profile. The velocity impulses needed, and the propellant masses required are presented for all of the mission maneuvers. Maximum payload capabilities were determined for both of the mission profiles examined. In addition, other issues relating to the feasibility of such lunar shuttle missions are discussed. The results of the analysis indicate that the Shuttle Orbiter would be a poor vehicle for payload delivery missions to lunar orbit.Document ID19910014907Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHaynes, Davy A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1991Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-104084NAS 1.15:104084Accession Number91N24220Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 594-81-12-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910014907.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### William Theile v. Samuel J. Dill.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling) JJ.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Wesley Solansky

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00031

- CV

Trial court case number: 2018

- 84050

Trial court: 257th District Court of Harris County

On Thursday, January 14, 2021, r elator Wesley Solansky filed a petition for writ of

mandamus . On Friday, January 15, 2021, relator filed a motion for emergency relief. On January

15, 2021, the Court granted the motion and issued an order stay ing all trial c ourt proceedings, as

requested in the motion prayer.

Today, real parties in interest filed a motion to lift the stay, or in the alternative, a motion

to reconsider the order entered on January 15, 2021.

The Court concludes that it requires a response to real parties’ motions. Relator shall file

a response to real parties’ motions by noon on Frid ay, January 2 9 , 2021

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Justice Richard Hightower

________________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ January 22, 2021

___
Mandamus DENIED and Opinion Filed April 30, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00506-CV

IN RE ROBERT WAYNE MITCHELL, Relator

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F08-00433

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Fillmore

Relator asks this Court to order the trial court to rule on his motion for a judgment nunc 

pro tunc. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. 

Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief 

requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); In re State of Tex. ex rel. Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320–21 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus.

140506F.P05

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
### PART V—TIME FOR FILING RETURNS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS

Sec.
6071.
Time for filing returns and other documents.
6072.
Time for filing income tax returns.
[6073, 6074. Repealed.]
6075.
Time for filing estate and gift tax returns.
[6076.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1941(b)(3)(C), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1324, struck out item 6076 "Time for filing return of windfall profit tax".

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §412(c)(2), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 793, struck out item 6073 "Time for filing declarations of estimated income tax by individuals".

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–223, title I, §101(c)(1)(B), Apr. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 250, added item 6076.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1904(b)(10)(A)(iii)(II), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1817, struck out item 6076 "Time for filing interest equalization tax returns".

**1968**—Pub. L. 90–364, title I, §103(e)(8), June 28, 1968, 82 Stat. 264, struck out item 6074 "Time for filing declarations of estimated income tax by corporations".

**1964**—Pub. L. 88–563, §3(d), Sept. 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 845, added item 6076.
### §564n. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §15, 68 Stat. 722; Pub. L. 85–132, §1(j), Aug. 14, 1957, 71 Stat. 348, which related to protection of property rights of minors, persons non compos mentis, and other members needing assistance, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of CooperIndustries, Inc. Cooper Industries U.S., Inc.or Cooper Industries, Ltd. and in each relatedProspectus of our report dated February 19, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Cooper Industries, Ltd. and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Cooper Industries, Ltd., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2007.   No. 2-33-14542 Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc. 1989 Employee StockPurchase Plan   No. 333-136381 Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc. Amended and RestatedDirectors Stock Plan   No. 333-120337 Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc. Amended and RestatedStock Incentive Plan   No. 333-24237 Form S-3D Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc. DividendReinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan   No. 333-101451 Form S-3D Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Ltd. DividendReinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan   No. 333-51439 Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc. Director’s RetainerFee Stock Plan   No. 333-51441 Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc. Amended and RestatedManagement Annual Incentive Plan   No. 333-37580 Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper (UK) Employee Share Purchase Plan   No. 333-143688 Form S-3 Registration Statement for Cooper U.S., Inc. Shelf Registration of DebtSecurities        Houston, Texas
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard J. Braun, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1)                   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)                   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   July 27, 2006 | By:   /s/ Richard J. Braun                |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                   | Richard J. Braun

Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

 

 
| 36 |
|----|

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPreliminary calculation of solar cosmic ray dose to the female breast in space missionNo regulatory dose limits are specifically assigned for the radiation exposure of female breasts during manned space flight. However, the relatively high radiosensitivity of the glandular tissue of the breasts and its potential exposure to solar flare protons on short- and long-term missions mandate a priori estimation of the associated risks. A model for estimating exposure within the breast is developed for use in future NASA missions. The female breast and torso geometry is represented by a simple interim model. A recently developed proton dose-buildup procedure is used for estimating doses. The model considers geomagnetic shielding, magnetic-storm conditions, spacecraft shielding, and body self-shielding. Inputs to the model include proton energy spectra, spacecraft orbital parameters, STS orbiter-shielding distribution at a given position, and a single parameter allowing for variation in breast size.Document ID19910008684Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsShavers, Mark*(Texas A&M Univ. College Station., United States)*Poston, John W.*(Texas A&M Univ. College Station., United States)*Atwell, William*(Rockwell International Corp. Houston, TX., United States)*Hardy, Alva C.*(NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, TX., United States)*Wilson, John W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1991Subject CategorySpace RadiationReport/Patent NumberL-16833NASA-TM-4235NAS 1.15:4235Accession Number91N17997Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 199-04-16-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910008684.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §640d–26. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §28, as added Pub. L. 96–305, §11, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 933, which related to applicability of environmental impact provisions and sections 1782 and 1752(g) of Title 43, Public Lands, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §3057. Severability and savings provisions

#### (a) Severability

If any provision of this chapter, or the application of any provision of this chapter to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the application of such provision or circumstance and the remainder of this chapter shall not be affected thereby.

#### (b) Savings

Nothing in this chapter—

(1) diminishes or expands the trust responsibility of the United States to Indian tribes, or any legal obligation or remedy resulting from that responsibility;

(2) alters, abridges, repeals, or affects any valid agreement between the Forest Service and an Indian tribe;

(3) alters, abridges, diminishes, repeals, or affects any reserved or other right of an Indian tribe; or

(4) alters, abridges, diminishes, repeals, or affects any other valid existing right relating to National Forest System land or other public land.

(Pub. L. 110–234, title VIII, §8107, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1289; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VIII, §8107, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2051.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of Title 7, Agriculture.
`EXHIBIT 11.1

                          SEAVIEW VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, INC
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                               Unaudited                         Unaudited
                                         Quarter Ended June 30,          Six Months Ended June 30,
                                        -----------------------         --------------------------
                                         2001             2000             2001             2000
                                         ----             ----             ----             ----

Net Income                         $    (91,703)    $   (790,160)    $   (355,831)    $ (1,027,961)
                                   =============    =============    =============    =============

Shares:
Basic weighted average
   number of shares
   outstanding                       18,507,291       11,141,790       18,314,787       10,209,278
Additional shares adjusted
   under nonvested stock
   for diluted earnings
   per share                                  0                0                0                0
                                   -------------    -------------    -------------    -------------
Diluted weighted average
   number of shares
   outstanding                       18,507,291       11,141,790       18,314,787       10,209,278
                                   =============    =============    =============    =============

Basic Earnings per Share
Net Income                                 (.01)            (.07)            (.02)            (.10)

Diluted Earnings per Share
Net Income                                 (.01)            (.07)            (.02)            (.10)`
§ 3601.8 Public availability of information. ( a ) All data and information concerning Federal and Indian minerals that you submit under this part are subject to part 2 of this title. Part 2 of this title includes the regulations of the Department of the Interior covering the public disclosure of data and information contained in Department of the Interior records. BLM may make available for inspection certain mineral information not protected from disclosure under part 2 of this title without a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552) request.
( b ) When you submit data and information under this part that you believe to be exempt from public disclosure, and that you wish BLM to withhold from such disclosure, you must clearly mark each page that you believe includes confidential information. BLM will keep all data and information confidential to the extent allowed by § 2.13(c) of this title.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL L. SCOTT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2554

[November 21, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Geoffrey D. Cohen, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 14011381 CF10A.

Michael L. Scott, Moore Haven, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated April 24, 2000 relating to the
financial statements as of January 31, 2000 and for each of the two years in the
period ended January 31, 2000, which appears in Aphton Corporation's Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2001. We also consent to
the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


                                            /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Honolulu, Hawaii
September 4, 2001
#### § 3816.3 Recommendations of Bureau of Reclamation to open lands.

When the application is received in the Bureau of Land Management, if found satisfactory, the duplicate will be transmitted to the Bureau of Reclamation with request for report and recommendation. In case the Bureau of Reclamation makes an adverse report on the application, it will be rejected subject to right of appeal.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, (the Form 10-Q),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
 2)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 5, 2005
    /s/ Richard T. PhillipsRichard T. PhillipsChief Accounting Officer
### §551. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 1, 1938, ch. 310, §1, 52 Stat. 605, which defined "Klamath Tribe" as used in this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.