alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 243

 232

 234

 243

 305

 267

 213

 227

 211

 197

 195

 214

 210

 195

 192

 202

 198

 213

 201

 205

 188

 174

 190

 177

 192

 176

 170

 165

 157

 164

 179

 177

 174

 185

 158

 176

 161

 156

 164

 151

 150

 143

 148

 151

 141

 152

 149

 175

 169

 147

 154

 148

 144

 146

 142

 143

 136

 133

 139

 132

 208

 201

 194

 216

 214

 215

 183

 190

 187

 179

 174

 172

 188

 173

 166

 175

 169

 191

 186

 171

 169

 158

 160

 157

 155

 155

 149

 145

 148

 143

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          68,455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,063
<PP&E>                                           8,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,355
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,596
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,734
<SALES>                                         30,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,627
<CGS>                                            1,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,951
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,942
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,009
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,009
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
        

</TABLE>
#### Chicago, Pekin and Southwestern Railroad Company *v.*The President and Trustees of the Town of Marseilles.

*At Ottawa, September Term, 1882. .*

Waiter of an appeal *bond—its effect as to perfecting the appeal.*Where a party praying an appeal to this court is given time for filing an appeal bond, the filing of a waiver of such bond by the appellee before the expiration of the time allowed, and before the filing of the bond, will have no effect whatever in the way of perfecting the appeal for any purpose, either to make it the duty of the person praying the appeal to take steps to bring the cause to a hearing, or to suspend the judgment in the court below. The parties remain in precisely the same attitude in that regard they were before the filing of the waiver.

In this case an appeal was prayed from the Appellate Court for the Second District. The order granting the appeal, made in vacation, was dated August 23, 1882, and was filed in the clerk’s office August 25. The order allowed an appeal on *92condition an appeal bond should be filed within thirty days. The cause was heard in the Appellate Court at the May term, 1882, and a judgment of affirmance entered in vacation on the 8th day of August, following. No appeal bond having been filed by the 29th day of August, the appellee filed in the office of the clerk of the Appellate Court a waiver of any appeal bond. On the third day of the present term of this court, the party praying the appeal not having filed a transcript of the record in this court, or taken any steps to bring the case before the court for consideration at the present term, the appellee now moves the court to affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court, under the rule, or, on failure of that motion, that this appeal be dismissed.

Mr. Charles Blanchard, for the motion,

contended that the waiver of the appeal bond by the appellee perfected the appeal as fully as if the appeal bond had been filed at that time, and that thereby the appellant was placed in such position that it was his duty to take all the steps in the case necessary to a hearing at the present term. Not having performed that duty, this motion should prevail.

Mr. Hiram T. Gilbert, *contra.*

Craig, J.:

The waiver by the appellee of the appeal bond did not operate to perfect the appeal for any purpose, either to make it incumbent upon the party praying the appeal to prepare the cause for a hearing at the present term, or to suspend the judgment in the court below. The parties are in precisely the same attitude they were before that waiver was filed. There is no appeal here for us to act upon,— nothing to dismiss. The case will be stricken from the docket.

*Motion denied.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 28419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11619]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7880]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Gustav Klimt: The Magic of Line''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Gustav Klimt: The Magic of Line,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the J. Paul Getty 
Museum, Los Angeles, California, from on or about July 3, 2012 until on 
or about September 23, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 8, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-11619 Filed 5-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE ALAN PINEDA, a.k.a. Juan

Antonio Burgos-Skerrett,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10218

D.C. No. 5:09-cr-01045-JF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jeremy D. Fogel, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Alan Pineda appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 108-month

sentence for conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine

hydrochloride, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(A). Pursuant to

FILED

MAR 15 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10218

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Pineda’s counsel has filed a brief

stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel

of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief have been

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We

dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d

1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
§ 3410.3-1 Issuance and termination of an exploration license. ( a ) The authorized officer has the discretion to issue an exploration license or to reject the application therefor under this subpart.
( b ) An exploration license shall become effective on the date specified by the authorized officer as the date when exploration activities may begin. An exploration license shall not be valid for more than two years from its effective date.
( c ) The approved exploration plan shall be attached and made a part of each exploration license.
( d ) Subject to the continued obligation of the licensee and the surety company to comply with the terms and conditions of the exploration license, the exploration plan, and the regulations, a licensee may relinquish an exploration license for all or any portion of the lands covered by it. A relinquishment shall be filed in the Bureau of Land Management State Office in which the original application was filed. See 43 CFR subpart 1821.
( e ) An exploration license may be cancelled by the authorized officer for noncompliance with its terms and conditions, the exploration plan, or the regulations, after the authorized officer has notified the licensee of the violation(s) in writing and the licensee has failed to correct the violation(s) within the period prescribed in the notice.
( f ) Should a licensee request a modification to the exploration plan, the authorized officer may approve the modification if geologic or other conditions warrant.
( g ) When unforeseen conditions that could result in substantial disturbance to the natural land surface or damage to the environment or improvements are encountered, or when geologic or other physical conditions warrant a modification in the approved exploration plan: ( 1 ) The authorized officer may adjust the terms and conditions of the exploration license, or
( 2 ) The authorized officer may direct adjustment in or approve modification of the exploration plan. If the licensee does not concur in the adjustment of the terms and conditions of the exploration license and exploration plan, he/she may, under 43 CFR part 4, appeal the decision modifying the license, or he/she may relinquish the exploration license.
( h ) Exploration licenses shall not be extended. Exploration operations may not be conducted after the exploration license has expired. The licensee may apply for a new exploration license as described in this section. A new exploration license may be issued simultaneously with the termination of the existing exploration license.
[44 FR 42613, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33135, July 30, 1982; 47 FR 38131, Aug. 30, 1982; 50 FR 8626, Mar. 4, 1985]
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                              Date: March 16, 2005

                        Commission File Number: 001-32305

                                   CORPBANCA
                 ---------------------------------------------
                (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                         Huerfanos 1072, Santiago Chile
                         ------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)




     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                      ---                       -----

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                           Yes                       No    X
                                 ---                      ---

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.

<PAGE>


     On March 16, 2005, Corpbanca announced unaudited consolidated financial
results for fourth quarter and year-end 2004. A copy of the announcement is
attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.

<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date:  March 16, 2005


                                 CORPBANCA


                                 By:  /s/ Camilo Morales Riquelme
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Name:   Camilo Morales Riquelme
                                    Title:  Division Manager - Planning and
                                            Development Control

<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


The following exhibit has been filed as part of this Form 6-K:


Exhibit  Description
-------  -----------
99.1     Corpbanca announcement, dated March 16, 2005, covering unaudited
         consolidated financial results for fourth quarter and year-end 2004.
### §966. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 87–235, §6, Sept. 14, 1961, 75 Stat. 509, which provided for costs incurred in the preparation of the membership roll and in the payment of the per capita shares to be paid from the judgment fund, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §70n–3. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–608, §1(16), Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1970

Section, Pub. L. 88–168, §3, Nov. 4, 1963, 77 Stat. 301, required a report to Committees on Interior and Insular Affairs of Senate and House of Representatives on every loan made under sections 70n–1 to 70n–7 of this title.
§ 3174.2 General requirements. ( a ) Oil may be stored only in tanks that meet the requirements of § 3174.5(b) of this subpart.
( b ) Oil must be measured on the lease, unit PA, or CA, unless approval for off-lease measurement is obtained under §§ 3173.22 and 3173.23 of this part.
( c ) Oil produced from a lease, unit PA, or CA may not be commingled with production from other leases, unit PAs, or CAs or non-Federal properties before the point of royalty measurement, unless prior approval is obtained under §§ 3173.14 and 3173.15 of this part.
( d ) An operator must obtain a BLM-approved FMP number under §§ 3173.12 and 3173.13 of this part for each oil measurement facility where the measurement affects the calculation of the volume or quality of production on which royalty is owed (*i.e.,* oil tank used for tank gauging, LACT system, CMS, or other approved metering device), except as provided in paragraph (h) of this section.
( e ) Except as provided in paragraph (h) of this section, all equipment used to measure the volume of oil for royalty purposes installed after January 17, 2017 must comply with the requirements of this subpart.
( f ) Except as provided in paragraph (h) of this section, measuring procedures and equipment used to measure oil for royalty purposes, that is in use on January 17, 2017, must comply with the requirements of this subpart on or before the date the operator is required to apply for an FMP number under 3173.12(e) of this part. Prior to that date, measuring procedures and equipment used to measure oil for royalty purposes, that is in use on January 17, 2017 must continue to comply with the requirements of Onshore Oil and Gas Order No. 4, Measurement of oil, § 3164.1(b) as contained in 43 CFR part 3160, (revised October 1, 2016), and any COAs and written orders applicable to that equipment.
( g ) The requirement to follow the approved equipment lists identified in §§ 3174.6(b)(5)(ii)(A), 3174.6(b)(5)(iii), 3174.8(a)(1), and 3174.9(a) does not apply until January 17, 2019. The operator or manufacturer must obtain approval of a particular make, model, and size by submitting the test data used to develop performance specifications to the PMT to review.
( h ) Meters used for allocation under a commingling and allocation approval under § 3173.14 are not required to meet the requirements of this subpart.
### PART II—REGULATION OF TRAFFIC IN CONTAINERS OF DISTILLED SPIRITS

Sec.
5301.
General.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part II, Denaturation, consisted of section 5331 to 5334, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

            REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16
              OR 15d-16 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                               Date: March 5, 2004

                        Commission File Number 001-12510
                                               ---------

                                   ROYAL AHOLD
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

               Albert Heijnweg 1, 1507 EH Zaandam, The Netherlands
                     (Address of principal executive office)


     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                     Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                ---                      -----

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                     Yes                       No    X
                          ---                       ---

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.
<PAGE>


     On March 5, 2004, Koninklijke Ahold N.V. ("Royal Ahold" or the "Company")
issued a press release announcing that it had reached an agreement with Chilean
retailer Cencosud S.A. for the sale of the Company's controlling stake in the
Argentine supermarket chain Disco S.A. A copy of the press release is attached
hereto as Exhibit 99.1.

     This Form 6-K shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into the
prospectuses forming a part of the Company's Registration Statements on Form F-3
and Form S-3 (No. 333-52934, No. 333-52934-01, No. 333-80245 and No.
333-80245-01) and the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.
333-09774, No. 333-70636, No. 333-07214, No. 333-07212 and No. 033-41068) and to
be a part of such prospectuses from the date of the filing thereof.
<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                       KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V.


                                       /s/ H.R. Ryopponen
                                       -----------------------------
Date:  March 8, 2004                   By: H.R. Ryopponen
                                       Title:   Executive Vice President and CFO
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



The following exhibit has been filed as part of this Form 6-K:


Exhibit  Description
-------  -----------

99.1     Royal Ahold press release, dated March 5, 2004, announcing that it had
         reached an agreement with Cencosud S.A. for the sale of its
         controlling stake in Disco S.A.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 30 DAY ACCUM MEAN 30 DAY AVG MEAN

1 361 310 343 7,225 241

2 366 311 339 7,254 242

3 384 301 353 7,334 244

4 350 299 320 7,415 247

5 404 346 362 7,553 252

6 443 389 417 7,771 259

7 424 326 372 7,900 263

8 367 264 315 7,954 265

9 266 236 247 8,201 273

10 257 215 236 8,437 281

11 264 228 245 8,682 289

12 277 260 270 8,952 298

13 310 247 279 9,008 300

14 266 167 202 8,955 299

15 164 113 134 8,765 292

16 111 98 102 8,554 285

17 107 98 101 8,361 279

18 130 108 118 8,159 272

19 150 132 143 8,009 267

20 179 152 170 7,921 264

21 158 86 113 7,752 258

22 90 79 82 7,564 252

23 151 92 119 7,422 247

24 144 117 130 7,274 242

25 145 111 127 7,112 237

26 174 137 158 7,032 234

27 193 176 188 6,957 232

28 186 118 151 6,819 227

29 116 87 101 6,596 220

30 113 84 95 6,332 211

31 134 115 127 6,116 204

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Vernalis On The San Joaquin River

Period: October 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
§ 30.414 What will be contained in the Order to Submit Bids? For each property for which a request to purchase at probate is pending, the Order to Submit Bids will include: ( a ) A finding of the fair market value of the interest to be sold, determined in accord with the appraisal/valuation provided by the BIA under § 30.411;
( b ) Information concerning where a copy of the appraisal/valuation may be viewed;
( c ) Direction to potential bidders to submit bids to purchase the property that are equal to or greater than the fair market value;
( d ) A deadline by which OHA must receive bids from all potential bidders; and
( e ) A statement that if no bids are submitted by the deadline, the request to purchase will be denied.
### **Subchapter C—Deductions**

Sec.
[2521.
Repealed.]
2522.
Charitable and similar gifts.
2523.
Gift to spouse.
2524.
Extent of deductions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XX, §2001(c)(2)(B)(ii), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1853, struck out item 2521 "Specific exemption".