alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Richard W. Lawrence, as Trustee, and President and Directors of Manhattan Company et al., as Successor Trustees under the Will of Charles Kohler, Deceased. Nils K. Florman, Appellant; Leonard P. Levy et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Decree, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 195

 191

 188

 196

 197

 193

 186

 174

 172

 171

 166

 160

 156

 154

 152

 146

 147

 149

 151

 153

 153

 151

 147

 144

 143

 151

 152

 148

 146

 144

 190

 186

 183

 188

 193

 187

 175

 165

 168

 165

 160

 154

 153

 149

 145

 141

 144

 142

 146

 148

 151

 145

 142

 141

 139

 142

 148

 145

 143

 140

 193

 188

 186

 191

 195

 189

 180

 169

 171

 167

 163

 157

 155

 151

 148

 143

 145

 145

 148

 149

 152

 149

 144

 142

 142

 147

 151

 147

 144

 141

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
Report of Management



We, as members of management of ABN AMRO Mortgage Group. Inc. (AAMG, a wholly owned subsidiary of ABN AMRO North America, Inc.) are responsible for complying with the minimum servicing standards as set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestarion Program For Mortgage Bankers (USAP). We are also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with these standards. We have performed an evaluation of AAMG's compliance with the minimum servicing standards as set forth in the USAP as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended.  Based on this evaluation, we assert that during the year ended December 31,2001, AAMG complied, in all material respects, with the minimum servicing standards set forth in thc USAP except as
described below.

Custodial bank and related clearing account reconciliations contained items which were not resolved within 90 calendar days of their original identification for 2 out of the 38 reconciliations tested. These items were resolved within 150 calendar days of their original identification.

As of and for this same period, ABN AMRO North America, Inc. had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount of $500,000,000 and an error and omissions policy in the amount of  $25,000,000..
January 29,2002

By:/s/ Stanley Rhodes





Stanley Rhodes
By:/s/Richard Geary

President





Group Senior Vice President and Manager
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934




For the month of January 2004

Commission File Number 333-7182-01

                                   CEZ, a. s.

      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)
                                c/o Duhova 2/1444
                                 140 53 Prague 4
                                 Czech Republic

      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.


                      Form 20-F X     Form 40-F
                               ---             ---

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
                                           ----------

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
                                           ----------

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                            Yes       No X
                               ---      ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
                                   ----------

<PAGE>


The following information was filed by CEZ, a. s. in Czech language with the
Prague Stock Exchange as required by its rules and regulations:

Coal Purchase Contracts

CEZ, a.s. concluded coal purchase contracts for 2004 with Appian Group and Gemec
Union.

<PAGE>


                                   Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                                 CEZ, a. s.
                                           ------------------------
                                                (Registrant)

Date:  January 14, 2004


                                           By: /s/ Libuse Latalova
                                              ---------------------------------
                                                    Libuse Latalova
                                               Head of Finance Administration
#### In the Matter of Alex A. Fabricant et al., Respondents, against City of New York, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lewis, P. J., Cars-well, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 975.]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-1973

___________

Gary L. Snyder, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Janice Snyder, Individually and *

Personally; Arapahoe County Sheriff’s *

Office, Multiple John and Jane Doe *

Sheriff Deputies, (Each Individually *

and Personally); Arapahoe County * Appeal from the United States

Social Services, Colorado; Jefferson * District Court for the

County Social Services, Colorado; * District of Minnesota.

Kathleen Curley, (Individually and *

Personally); Ingrid Holmes, * [UNPUBLISHED]

(Individually and Personally); Mardi *

A. Ewing, (Individually and *

Personally); Linda Froehler, *

(Individually and Personally); Linda *

Gibson-Hendrick, (Individually and *

Personally); Charles D. Moon, *

(Individually and Personally); Katie *

Smith, (Individually and *

Personally); Stephanie Simpson, *

 (Individually and Personally); Eileen *

Wiseman, (Individually and *

Personally); John Doe Process *

Service Company, Colorado *

(Individually and Personally and in its *

Business Capacity); Orbitz Couriers; *

Douglas County Sheriff’s Office, *

Multiple John and Jane Doe Sheriff *
1

The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota.

-2-

Deputies, (Each Individually and *

Personally); Jennifer Gening, RN *

(Individually and Personally); Douglas *

County, Minnesota, (In Its *

Governmental Capacity); Jeffry *

Rustand, (Individually and *

Personally); Sherburne County Social *

Services, Minnesota; Mary Patton, *

(Individually and Personally); Jeffrey *

Scott Snyder, (Individually and *

Personally; For Jurisdiction Only); *

Barry Brooks Snyder, (Individually *

and Personally; For Jurisdiction *

Only); Kevin Grant Snyder, *

(Individually and Personally; For *

Jurisdiction Only), *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: November 25, 2008

Filed: December 2, 2008

___________

Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gary Snyder appeals the district court’s1

 adverse judgment disposing of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review, we have found no basis for reversal and

therefore affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            1970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1977
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              111
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1977
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    73
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   140
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (68)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (68)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (68)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.78)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.5


                        Report of Independent Accountants


Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., Transferor,
and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, Servicer

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Servicing of Securitized Credit Card
Receivables, that JPMorgan Chase Bank (the "Bank"), as servicer of the Chase
Master Trust, maintained effective internal control over servicing of
securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2003, based upon the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. The Bank's management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
servicing of the securitized credit card receivables, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that JPMorgan Chase Bank, as servicer of
the Chase Master Trust, maintained effective internal control over servicing of
securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2003, is fairly stated,
in all material respects, based upon the criteria for effective internal control
established in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


March 25, 2004
#### § 3410.3-3 Operating regulations.

The licensee shall comply with the provisions of the operating regulations of the Bureau of Land Management (43 CFR part 3480). Copies of the operating regulations may be obtained from the authorized officer. Authorized representatives of the Secretary and, where appropriate the surface management agency shall be permitted to inspect the premises and operations. The licensee shall allow the free ingress and egress of Government officers and other persons using the land under authority of the United States.

[44 FR 42613, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33135, July 30, 1982; 50 FR 8626, Mar. 4, 1985]
Ernst & Young LLP	Phone: (312) 879-2000
Sears Tower	www.ey.com
233 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606-6301
Report on Management's Assertion on Compliance
with Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

Report of Independent Accountants


Board of Directors ABN AMRO North America, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report titled Report of Management, that except for noncompliance with the minimum servicing standard for custodial bank and related clearing account reconciliations, ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. (AAMG, a wholly owned subsidiary of ABN AMRO North America, Inc.) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) during the year ended December 31, 200 1. Management is responsible for AAMG's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertions about AAMG's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about AAMG's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on AAMG's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion, that except for noncompliance with custodial bank and related clearing account reconciliations, AAMG complied with the aforementioned requirements during the year ended December 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the board of directors, management, and AAMG's private investors and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.
January 29, 2002
A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
#### § 3400.5 Coal production regions.

The Bureau of Land Management shall establish by publication in the Federal Register coal production regions. A coal production region may be changed or its boundaries altered by publication of a notice of change in the Federal Register. Coal production regions shall be used for establishing regional leasing levels under § 3420.2 of this title. Coal production regions shall be used to establish areas in which leasing shall be conducted under § 3420.3 of this title and for other purposes of the coal management program.

[47 FR 33135, July 30, 1982]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComputation of an Underexpanded 3-D Rectangular Jet by the CE/SE MethodRecently, an unstructured three-dimensional space-time conservation element and solution element (CE/SE) Euler solver was developed. Now it is also developed for parallel computation using METIS for domain decomposition and MPI (message passing interface). The method is employed here to numerically study the near-field of a typical 3-D rectangular under-expanded jet. For the computed case-a jet with Mach number Mj = 1.6. with a very modest grid of 1.7 million tetrahedrons, the flow features such as the shock-cell structures and the axis switching, are in good qualitative agreement with experimental results.Document ID20010017834Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsLoh, Ching Y.*(Taitech, Inc. Cleveland, OH United States)*Himansu, Ananda*(Taitech, Inc. Cleveland, OH United States)*Wang, Xiao Y.*(Taitech, Inc. Cleveland, OH United States)*Jorgenson, Philip C. E.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 2000Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2000-210594E-12552NAS 1.15:210594AIAA Paper 2001-0986Meeting InformationMeeting: Aerospace SciencesLocation: Reno, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 8, 2001End Date: January 11, 2001Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-97186PROJECT: RTOP 708-90-43Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010017834.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Patience E. Hunn, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

(Agued June 10, 1878;

decided June 18, 1878.)

*A. P. Laning*for appellant.

*Wm. C. Watson*for respondent.

Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur, except Rapallo, J., absent.

Judgment affirmed.
#### Respondent, v. Morris Coopersmith, Appellant.

Order unanimously modified by striking out paragraphs 5 to 9 inclusive, the first sentence of paragraph 10, all except the first two sentences of paragraph 12 and the first line of paragraph 13; and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
#### § 3502.15 Are there any additional restrictions on holding leases or interests in leases?

Yes. If you are a member of Congress or an employee of the Department of the Interior, except as provided in part 20 of this title, you may not acquire or hold any Federal lease, or lease interest. (Officer, agent or employee of the Department-see part 20 of this title; Member of Congress-see R.S. 3741; 41 U.S.C. 22; 18 U.S.C. 431-433). Also, BLM may not issue any lease or permit which causes a conflict of interest. See 5 CFR part 2635.
‘OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
Xonorablo Edgar A. Maddox, Pwa e 

.: 

I 

4 kill or havm kil1.d aoh 6e.r while ln 

She sot or dwtrorlng mob oropm, puturom, 

ar $ardM‘. 

“SeO. 3. All law8 ar part8 oh laws ln 

‘0 far u they oonfllst with any portion or 

thla &t b*, and &ha aatm are, herabr rop‘+lOd.' 

*ourbh ana lut *witiota rooltu the raot that th8 prwlotrs 

law ha‘ not. boba ‘ufftoiant to proteot tha oropa, ~rtur.8 and 

aawtkm 0r th0 r- of thou tro qountle‘, an4 deo1ar.s au 

-ojr. 

Houu Bill No. 155 (now 8odlfied aa wt. W9a, VWn~n*i,Penal Oodq of 19IlS) ro@ulato‘ the plaolng and ka.pl.ng or 

dmm$ parti8 t!aOrWi 011 aold ‘torya, and the dlapori~1o.n 

. But th0 rlret 8ootion th0200r prorid b g~a83 

knu u raarrt 

"aiat'lon 1. Any deer or pax% OS aam law- 

$ully klllrd.or onhrod into thlkstato 4 br 

i ~I pe88~8otLrromthotlma thataamewa8 lawrully 

%._ killed or, ontorod iaso thlr $ta6w and untill c : a0 rfiqw+g ai* wt.- 

Aa-, u you do in youclnquily, that the door 

waakilloduadu 8ueI~eondltlons than Itrro lawStallykil&d, 

and she pla3.n pToYl8lon8 o?motion 1 of mu8e Blll No. lSS 

pemrit it8 r*tentlon unt2.l the r0iiorritlg Jrurn 5th. Thlr la 

partiauhrly true in view of th* raot that Hou8b Bill8 m. a37 

and 159 are the lateot expro88loar of the lagl8latlva dll upan 

the ‘ubjoot. 

wo oall to your attontlon, h-v@, the fafaot that Artiolo %3(g), Voznon*a Penal Codm of 1925 i prohibits the use of 
Eonorabla BtQI‘r A. YawQX, Pago s 

a door @all in huntine dopr; Artlob 98sh prohiblk t&m a@*,,’ 

0rr~bg r0r 840, 0r 

E 

88r88105 ‘alter pup&a80 or say wild 

door or the oaroa88, d0 02 mm8 tha00rt m~0i0 aso 

prodbil‘ *ha ll#* or a dO@ in hlms* door in 8toplwl‘ all4 

palo PInSo Wuntiu (am0116 othira); Artiole 901 prohibita 

hunting from an autemoblle, pworbbat, 6e.i aad ArCiolo 901 

prohibit!8 hunt- b7 mma# ai a~ utlflolal ll@t. Tlwr 

atatutu am not in say mennor dra0ted by the ~pra~l8lo~ or 

Bou‘o BillSo. 819. 

Isle thoroforo, our opinion thattb omrmuuof 

deulawfullykjllad inPal Pinto cOwxtybylandonwrm,or 

under tdulr dlrootioa, while $81 the aot or du%ro 

puturoa or garduta, may ba retaiaod and uaad unt P 1~ tli?%%ww . 

l.ng Juno Sth, ir~tbm‘timannar~ and uadu th.8~1 eeaditio~, 

aa irthrJrh~bo~latrrllJkill~dduring~opur~~on. 

BY (‘I W. R. Allen 

A“l8taat 

., . 

wRA:RS 

APPROVBO DBO. u8, l%L AFTROVIPI 

(a) or0?orsol1u* opinion oamittn 

firat Mal8taat httorn*y ~goner4 m B. W. 8. UhaM