alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-21733-CV-WILLIAMS

LAZARO REYES,

Plaintiff,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Chief United States Magistrate Judge Edwin 

G. Torres’ Report and Recommendation (DE 27) (“Report”) on Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (DE 25) (“Motion”). In the Report,

Chief Magistrate Judge Torres recommends that the Court grant in part and deny in part 

Plaintiff’s Motion. (DE 27 at 1.) Specifically, the Report finds that some of the time entries 

submitted by Plaintiff’s counsel were clerical in nature. (Id. at 2–3.) As such, the Report 

concludes the total compensable hours billed in 2020 should be reduced from 4.2 hours 

to 3.5 hours. (Id. at 3.) Additionally, Chief Magistrate Judge Torres finds that the hours 

billed by counsel on Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was reasonable and not 

excessive. (Id.) Taking the reduction into consideration, the Report recommends the 

Court award $7,162.72 in attorney’s fees to Plaintiff’s counsel. (Id.) No objections were 

filed to the Report, and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, upon an independent 

review of the Report, the Motion, the record, and applicable law, it is ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED as follows: 

Case 1:20-cv-21733-KMW Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2024 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The Report (DE 27) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (DE 

25) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 

3. If the United States Department of the Treasury verifies to the Office of General 

Counsel that Plaintiff does not owe a debt, the Government should honor 

Plaintiff’s assignment of fees, costs, and expenses under the Equal Access to 

Justice Act, and therefore make Plaintiff’s total fee award of $7,162.72 payable 

directly to Plaintiff’s counsel. 

4. This matter shall remain CLOSED. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 13th day of February,

2024.

Case 1:20-cv-21733-KMW Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2024 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99(f)
                           PRESS RELEASE


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FRIDAY
June 20, 1997


CONTACT PERSON:          STACY DUCKETT, VICE PRESIDENT
                         CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS
                         (501) 688-8229


                     TCBY DECLARES CASH DIVIDEND


LITTLE ROCK, AR  - June  20, 1997 -  TCBY ENTERPRISES,  INC.
(NYSE:TBY) today  announced the  Board of  Directors of  the
Company declared  a  $.05 per  share  cash dividend.    This
dividend is  payable on  July 14,  1997 to  shareholders  of
record as of July 3, 1997.

TCBY  Enterprises,  Inc.,   through  subsidiary   companies,
manufactures and sells soft serve frozen yogurt, soft  serve
sorbet, hardpack  frozen  yogurt, hardpack  ice  cream,  and
frozen novelty products, and markets foodservice  equipment.
The Company is  the world's largest  manufacturer-franchisor
of  frozen  yogurt.    The  Company,  through  subsidiaries,
develops locations and products under the "TCBY"(Registered)
and Juice Works(Registered) brands.

                               -30-
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Eddie Ford, Defendant-Appellant.

(Nos. 58116-7 cons.;

First District (5th Division)

June 21, 1974.

*891James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Donald S. Honschell and Ronald P. Alwin, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel), for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., and Barry Rand Elden, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

PER CURIAM.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                            SCOPUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
               STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED  SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                            SEPTEMBER 30,      SEPTEMBER 30,
                                         ------------------- -----------------
                                           1996      1997      1996     1997
(IN THOUSANDS, EXPECT PER SHARE DATA     --------- --------- -------- --------
                                                      (UNAUDITED)
<S>                                      <C>       <C>       <C>      <C>
Primary
Weighted average number of common
 shares outstanding....................     17,814    20,436   17,559   20,368
Shares issuable pursuant to options
 granted underemployee stock option
 plan, less assumed repurchased at the
 average fair market value during the
 period (1)............................      1,346     1,199    1,577    1,331
Number of shares for computation of net
 income per share......................     19,160    21,635   19,136   21,699
                                         ========= ========= ======== ========
Net income.............................  $   1,501 $   1,029 $  2,349 $  3,583
                                         ========= ========= ======== ========
Net income per share...................  $    0.08 $    0.05 $   0.12 $   0.17
                                         ========= ========= ======== ========
</TABLE>
 
--------
(1) There is no difference between primary and fully diluted net income per
share.
 
                                    Page 20
#### Western Building Corp., Landlord, Appellant, v. Raymond J. Bruder, Tenant, and Morton E. Smuckler, Undertenant, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, with $10 costs. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
### §1019. Property on which lessee has made improvements

Neither the basis nor the adjusted basis of any portion of real property shall, in the case of the lessor of such property, be increased or diminished on account of income derived by the lessor in respect of such property and excludable from gross income under section 109 (relating to improvements by lessee on lessor's property).

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 301; Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §221(a)(76), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4049.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–295 struck out last sentence which read as follows: "If an amount representing any part of the value of real property attributable to buildings erected or other improvements made by a lessee in respect of such property was included in gross income of the lessor for any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1942, the basis of each portion of such property shall be properly adjusted for the amount so included in gross income."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2014 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 113–295 effective Dec. 19, 2014, subject to a savings provision, see section 221(b) of Pub. L. 113–295, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
§ 2652.1 Entitlement. ( a ) Eligible regional corporations may select the maximum acreage granted pursuant to section 12(c) of the Act. They will be notified by the Secretary of their entitlement as expeditiously as possible.
( b ) Where subsurface rights are not available to the eligible regional corporations in lands whose surface has been conveyed under section 14 of the Act, the regional corporations may select an equal subsurface acreage from lands withdrawn under sections 11(a) (1) and (3) of the Act, within the region, if possible.
( c ) As appropriate, the regional corporations will receive title to the subsurface estate of lands, the surface estate of which is conveyed pursuant to section 14 of the Act.
( d ) If a 13th regional corporation is organized under section 7(c) of the Act, it will not be entitled to any grant of lands.
#### § 3107.21 Continuation by production.

A lease will be extended so long as oil or gas is being produced in paying quantities.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avantogen Oncology, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Lauro Valdovinos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 11, 2006By:

/s/ Lauro ValdovinosLauro ValdovinosChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                   UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                               Date: May 18, 2005

                        Commission File Number 001-12510

                                   ROYAL AHOLD
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

               Albert Heijnweg 1, 1507 EH Zaandam, The Netherlands
                     (Address of principal executive office)



     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                     Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                ---                       ---

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                     Yes                       No    X
                         ---                        ---

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.

<PAGE>

     On May 18, 2005, Koninklijke Ahold N.V. ("Royal Ahold" or the "Company")
issued a press release announcing that it has signed a new credit facility with
a syndicate of fifteen banks. A copy of this press release is attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1.

     This Form 6-K shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into the
prospectuses forming a part of the Company's Registration Statements on Form F-3
and Form S-3 (No. 333-52934, No. 333-52934-01, No. 333-80245 and No.
333-80245-01) and the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.
333-09774, No. 333-70636, No. 333-07214, No. 333-07212 and No. 033-41068) and to
be a part of such prospectuses from the date of the filing thereof.

<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorised.


                                    KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V.


                                            /s/   H.R. Ryopponen
                                    --------------------------------------------
Date: May 18, 2005                  By:     H.R. Ryopponen
                                    Title:  Executive Vice President and CFO


                                       3

<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


The following exhibit has been filed as part of this Form 6-K:


Exhibit        Description
-------        ------------

99.1           Royal Ahold press release dated May 18, 2005, announcing that the
               Company has signed a new credit facility with a syndicate of
               fifteen banks

                                       4

<PAGE>
MEMORANDUM

TO: Portland Cement N SPS Docket FROM: Keith Barnett, USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG DATE: September 25, 2009 SUBJECT: September 24, 2009 Meeting between U
. S
. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Sierra Club in Ariel Rios North, Washington D .C. Introduction and Objectives Representatives from Sierra Club requested a meeting with Gina McCarth y, Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, to discuss the schedule for completing the review of the Portland Cement NSPS. Meeting Summary Several representative s from the Sierra Club and Reed Zars (their counsel

- by phone) met with Gina McCarth y, the Associate Administrator for Air And Radiation to discuss Sierra Club concerns on the NSPS schedule and potential greenhouse gas regulations. Also att ending f

ro m EPA (among others) were Peter Tsirigotis and Keith Barnett.2

A TTACHMENT 1

– MEETING ATTENDEES EPA

– PCA March 19, 2009 Attendees Affiliation Steve Silverman EPA Keith Barnett EPA, by phone Steve Fruh EPA, by phone Elineth Torre s EPA, by phone Andy O’Hare Portland Cement Association (PCA) David Novello Novello Law Other individual cement company representatives.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7434** 

HERBERT L. BELL, a/k/a Herbert Lee Bell , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden of Lee Correctional Inst , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 4:12

- cv - 02555

- RBH )

Submitted : January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Herbert L. Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Caroli na, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Herbert L. Bell seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (20 12) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitut ional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural rulin g is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### § 3715.4-4 What if there is a dispute over the fee simple title to the lands on which my existing occupancy is located?

BLM may defer a determination of concurrence or non-concurrence with your occupancy until the underlying fee simple title to the land has been finally determined by the Department of the Interior. During this time, your existing occupancy may continue, subject to § 3715.5(a).
### §2002. Liability for payment

The tax imposed by this chapter shall be paid by the executor.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 374; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title V, §544(b)(1), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 894; Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7304(b)(2)(A), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2353.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–239 substituted "The" for "Except as provided in section 2210, the".

1984—Pub. L. 98–369 inserted exception phrase.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1989 Amendment

Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7304(b)(3), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2353, provided that: "The amendments made by this subsection [amending this section and section 6018 of this title and repealing section 2210 of this title] shall apply to estates of decedents dying after July 12, 1989."

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title V, §544(d), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 894, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting section 2210 of this title and amending this section and sections 6018 and 6166 of this title] shall apply to those estates of decedents which are required to file returns on a date (including any extensions) after the date of enactment of this Act [July 18, 1984]."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1558-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-1558-DR), dated September 20, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 27, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective September 27, 2004.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 04-22319 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
§ 11.25 Preassessment screen—preliminary identification of resources potentially at risk. ( a ) *Preliminary identification of pathways.* ( 1 ) The authorized official shall make a preliminary identification of potential exposure pathways to facilitate identification of resources at risk.
( 2 ) Factors to be considered in this determination should include, as appropriate, the circumstances of the discharge or release, the characteristics of the terrain or body of water involved, weather conditions, and the known physical, chemical, and toxicological properties of the oil or hazardous substance.
( 3 ) Pathways to be considered shall include, as appropriate, direct contact, surface water, ground water, air, food chains, and particulate movement.
( b ) *Exposed areas.* An estimate of areas where exposure or effects may have occurred or are likely to occur shall be made. This estimate shall identify: ( 1 ) Areas where it has been or can be observed that the oil or hazardous substance has spread;
( 2 ) Areas to which the oil or hazardous substance has likely spread through pathways; and
( 3 ) Areas of indirect effect, where no oil or hazardous substance has spread, but where biological populations may have been affected as a result of animals moving into or through the site.
( c ) *Exposed water estimates.* The area of ground water or surface water that may be or has been exposed may be estimated by using the methods described in appendix I of this part.
( d ) *Estimates of concentrations.* An estimate of the concentrations of oil or a hazardous substance in those areas of potential exposure shall be developed.
( e ) *Potentially affected resources.* ( 1 ) Based upon the estimate of the areas of potential exposure, and the estimate of concentrations in those areas, the authorized official shall identify natural resources for which he may assert trusteeship that are potentially affected by the discharge or release. This preliminary identification should be used to direct further investigations, but it is not intended to preclude consideration of other resources later found to be affected.
( 2 ) A preliminary estimate, based on information readily available from resource managers, of the services of the resources identified as potentially affected shall be made. This estimate will be used in determining which resources to consider if further assessment efforts are justified.