alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

      Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities
                              Exchange Act of 1934

                                   ----------

I, Francis Chang, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended March 31, 2005
of ELECTRONIC SENSOR TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company");

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.


                                      /s/ Francis Chang
Date: October 19, 2006                ------------------------------------------
                                      Francis Chang
                                      Secretary, Treasurer and Vice President of
                                      Finance and Administration
#### § 3502.13 May foreign citizens hold permits or leases?

No. However, foreign citizens may hold stock in United States corporations that hold leases or permits if the laws, customs, or regulations of their country do not deny similar privileges to citizens or corporations of the United States.
### **Subchapter B—Coal**

Sec.
4121.
Imposition of tax.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter B consisted of sections 4111 to 4113, 4121, and 4131 of this title.

Section 4111, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 485; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §111(a), 72 Stat. 1277, imposed a manufacturers excise tax of 5 percent on household type refrigerators, quick freeze or frozen storage units, or combinations, and a tax of 10 percent on self-contained air-conditioning units, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–44, title II, §203, June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 139, applicable with respect to articles sold on or after June 22, 1956.

Section 4112, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 485; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 805, §1(e), 69 Stat. 689, defined refrigerator components, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §111(b)(1), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1277, effective the first day of the first calendar quarter beginning more than 60 days after Sept. 2, 1958.

Section 4113, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 485, related to exemptions for manufacturers of refrigerator components, prior to repeal by act Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 805, §1(d), 69 Stat. 689, effective on the first day of the first month beginning more than 10 days after Aug. 11, 1955.

Section 4121, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 486; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §112, 72 Stat. 1277, imposed a 5 percent tax on electric, gas, and oil household appliances and their accessories, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–44, title II, §203, June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 139, applicable with respect to articles sold on or after June 22, 1965.

Section 4131, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 486, imposed a 10 percent tax on electric light bulbs and tubes, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–44, title II, §203, June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 139, applicable with respect to articles sold on or after Jan. 1, 1965.
### §575. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 27, 1939, ch. 387, §5, 53 Stat. 1129, which related to restoration of lands to tribal ownership, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
riii_ex4i.htm

  EXHIBIT 4(i)
  
  
  
  
 	 
	1
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	2
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	3
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	4
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	5
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	6
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	7
	

	 

  
  
 	 
	8
	

	 

  
  
 	 9
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsProject LASER: Learning about science, engineering, and researchThe number of American students entering science and engineering careers and their ranking in comparison with other countries is on the decline. This decline has alarmed Congress which, in 1987, established a Task Force on Women, Minorities, and the Handicapped in Science and Technology to define the problem and find solutions. If left unchanged, the task force has warned that the prospects for maintaining an advanced industrial society will diminish. NASA is supportive of the six goals outlined by the task force, which are paraphrase herein, and is carefully assessing its education programs to identify those offering the greatest potential for achieving the task force objectives with a reasonable range of resources. A major initiative is under way on behalf of NASA at its Marshall Space Flight Center, where highly effective features of several NASA education programs along with innovations are being integrated into a comprehensive pilot program. This program, dubbed Project LASER, is discussed.Document ID19910008523Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryEconomics And Cost AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:103382NASA-TM-103382Accession Number91N17836Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910008523.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 369

 372

 376

 384

 395

 411

 425

 437

 433

 436

 428

 424

 433

 449

 456

 452

 469

 458

 479

 456

 486

 468

 502

 481

 482

 474

 472

 461

 452

 445

 431

 355

 364

 368

 374

 384

 401

 412

 412

 414

 414

 413

 406

 409

 426

 438

 440

 432

 429

 422

 424

 418

 417

 421

 432

 442

 442

 436

 425

 409

 387

 372

 360

 368

 371

 378

 388

 404

 416

 421

 423

 424

 418

 413

 421

 436

 444

 445

 445

 437

 436

 430

 437

 427

 435

 447

 455

 451

 449

 436

 423

 406

 387

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-1054V

Filed: September 30, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

YVONNE WILSON,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Shealene Priscilla Mancuso, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On July 18, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

(the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a right shoulder injury as a result of 

receiving the influenza vaccine on October 13, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was 

assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 26, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

 

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This 

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine 

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the 

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned 

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from 

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in 

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management 

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner’s claim meets the Table 

criteria for [shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”)].” Id. at 3. 

Respondent further agrees that “petitioner satisfies the statutory severity requirement by 

suffering the residual effects or complications of her injury for more than six months 

after vaccine administration.” Id. at 4. 

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
#### § 3420.5-1 Announcement.

Following completion of the requirements of §§ 3420.3 and 3420.4 of this title, the Secretary shall announce the adoption of a final regional lease sale schedule. The announcement shall be published in the Federal Register and contain a legal description of each tract included in the lease sale schedule and the date when each tract has been tentatively scheduled for sale. Notice of this announcement shall be published in at least 1 newspaper of general distribution in each state within the region for which the regional lease sale schedule is adopted.

[44 FR 42615, July 19, 1979. Redesignated and amended at 47 FR 33139, July 30, 1982]
### §758. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1207, §18, 68 Stat. 1104, which provided for revocation of corporate charter and termination of Federal power effective on the date of the proclamation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Table 23

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

 Madera Canal and Millerton Lake

2013

Monthly Deliveries in AF

Water Users Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

MADERA CANAL

Chowchilla WD 0 0 0 0 0 11461 23082 1749 0 0 0 0 36292

Madera ID 0 0 0 0 0 19282 23594 16749 0 0 0 0 59625

Soquel (Madera non-proj) 0 0 7 7 8 8 9 8 8 8 6 8 77

Total 0 0 7 7 8 30751 46685 18506 8 8 6 8 95994

MILLERTON LAKE

County of Madera 3 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 3 1 1 3 34

Fresno County # 18 5 7 8 11 15 17 18 18 16 13 9 7 144

Gravelly Ford WD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

.

Total 8 9 10 13 18 21 23 23 19 14 10 10 178

Notes: Data provided by South-Central California Area Office-Fresno

 Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis LARA-VIEGAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40139.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 2, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Luis Lara-Viegas appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after a previous deportation. Lara-Viegas argues that the district reversibly erred under *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), by sentencing him pursuant to a mandatory application of the Sentencing Guidelines.

There was no *“Booker”*error or Sixth Amendment violation because the only enhancement to Lara-Viegas’s sentence was for his prior conviction. *See Booker,*125 S.Ct. at 756, 769. Nevertheless, the district court committed *“Fanfan*” error by sentencing Lara-Viegas pursuant to a mandatory guidelines scheme. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir.2005). Although Lara-Viegas contends that such error is structural, he acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent; he raises the issue here only for preservation purposes.

The Government concedes that LaraViegas preserved his *Fanfan*claim. As such, this court reviews the claim for harmless error. *See Walters,*418 F.3d at 464. There is no indication in the record that the district court would have imposed the same sentence had the guidelines been advisory rather than mandatory. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with *Booker.*

Lara-Viegas next argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional on their face and as applied in his case in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Lara-Viegas’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Lara-Viegas contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *AlmendarezTorres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Lara-Viegas properly *839concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, Lara-Viegas’s conviction is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
§ 3400.3-2 Department of Defense lands. The Secretary may issue leases with the consent of the Secretary of Defense on acquired lands set apart for military or naval purposes only if the leases are issued to a governmental entity which: ( a ) Produces electrical energy for sale to the public;
( b ) Is located in the state in which the leased lands are located; and
( c ) Has production facilities in that state, and will use the coal produced from the lease within that state.
§ 3502.40 What happens if an applicant or successful bidder for a permit or lease dies before the permit or lease is issued? ( a ) If probate of the estate has been completed or is not required, BLM will issue the permit or lease to the heirs or devisees, or their guardian. We will recognize the heirs or devisees or their guardian as the record title holders of the permit or lease. They must send us: ( 1 ) A certified copy of the will or decree of distribution, and if no will or decree exists, a statement signed by the heirs that they are the only heirs and citing the provisions of the law of the deceased's last domicile showing that no probate is required; and
( 2 ) A statement signed by each of the heirs or devisees with reference to citizenship and holdings similar to that required by § 3502.27 of this part. If the heir or devisee is a minor, the guardian or trustee must sign the statement.
( b ) If probate is required but has not been completed, BLM will issue the permit or lease to the executor or administrator of the estate. BLM considers the executor or administrator as the record title holder of the permit or lease. He or she must send: ( 1 ) Evidence that the person who, as executor or administrator, submits lease and bond forms has authority to act in that capacity and to sign those forms;
( 2 ) Evidence that the heirs or devisees are the only heirs or devisees of the deceased; and
( 3 ) A statement signed by each heir or devisee concerning citizenship and holdings, as required by § 3502.27 of this part.
§ 2804.11 Where do I file my grant application? ( a ) You must file the grant application in the BLM field office having jurisdiction over the lands affected by your application.
( b ) If your application affects more than one BLM administrative unit, you may file at any BLM office having jurisdiction over any part of the project. BLM will notify you where to direct subsequent communications.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 23, 2015

No. 04-14-00772-CR

Jonathan Jose GUILLEN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2647

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The State’s brief was originally due September 16, 2015; however, the court granted an 

extension of time to file the brief until October 16. The State has filed a motion requesting an 

additional thirty-one days to file the brief. 

We grant the motion and order the State’s brief due November 16, 2015. Counsel is 

advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion that (1) demonstrates 

extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel 

has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief 

will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally 

consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of October, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
T17N R2W

3 2 1

10 11 12

15 14 13

22 23 24

9

4

16

21

Stegeman

CCOOLL UU SSAA CC OO

103.7 R

Contract No. 14-06-200-7206A-R-1

Exhibit B

Cachil Dehe of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community

725-202-85

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.4 0.8

Miles

Date: November 9, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\cachil_dehe\cachil_dehe_of_wintun_indians.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Huntington Preferred Capital,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2001,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael J. McMennamin, President of the Company (principal
executive officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                           /s/ Michael J. McMennamin
                                      ----------------------------------
                                             Michael J. McMennamin
                                             President
                                             (principal executive officer)
                                             August 19, 2002
### §640d–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §2, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1712, which related to negotiating teams for the Navajo and Hopi Tribes and negotations between the tribes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3601.20 Rights of parties.
Sacramento River

CC OO LL UU SS AA CC OO

GG LLEE NN NN CC OO

T17N R2W

T18N R2W

T17N R1W

T18N R1W

106.0 R

3 2 1 6

7 10 11 12

34 35 36 31

18

15 14 13

9

Stegeman

Contract No. 14-06-200-5211A-R-1

Exhibit B

Green Valley Corporation

725-202-60

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

Date: November 8, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\green_valley_corporation_5211\green_valley_corporation.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

0 0.5 1

Miles