alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3474.3 Bond conversions. ( a ) The authorized officer shall notify those leaseholders who have nationwide or statewide bonds at the time of issuance of this subpart of the requirement to secure a separate lease bond for each lease in the amount determined by the authorized officer to be proper and necessary.
( b ) ( 1 ) In setting or adjusting individual lease bond amounts, the authorized officer shall assure that the lease bond covers reclamation within a permit area where the Surface Mining Officer, because of the absence of a cooperative agreement governing Federal lands within that state, notifies the authorized officer that the lease bond should cover that reclamation.
( 2 ) After consultation with the Surface Mining Officer, the authorized officer may release the amount of any outstanding bond which is related to, and is not necessary to secure, the performance of reclamation within a permit area.
[44 FR 42643, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33151, July 30, 1982]
® 

NHDES 

The State of New Hampshire 

Department of Environmental Services 

Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner 

Celebrating 25years of protecting 

New Hampshire's environment. 

July 3, 2012 

David Conroy, Chief 

Air Programs Branch 

USEPA New England, Region I 

5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

Re: PM2.5 Infrastructure Submittals 

Dear Mr. Conroy: 

Your staff are reviewing the Section 110(a) infrastructure submittals made by the New 

Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (DES) for the 1997 and 2006 National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter smaller than 2 .5 microns in 

diameter (PM2,5) . In response to questions from your staff, DES is providing the following 

information to address the requirements of paragraphs 110(a)(2)(D) and (G) of the Clean Air Act. 

As Governor Lynch's designee, I certify that New Hampshire is not contributing 

significantly to the nonattainment or interfering with the maintenance of the 1997 or 2006 PM2.5 

NAAQS in any other state . This statement is supported by modeling analyses contained in New 

Hampshire's 2008 Transport SIP. In addition, the states contiguous to New Hampshire are in 

attainment of both the 1997 and 2006 PM2,5 NAAQS . 

With respect to element G, DES expects New Hampshire to be designated as a Priority III 

Region under 40 CFR 51 .150, thereby negating the need for a PM2,5 emergency episode plan. 

Please let me know if you need additional information or if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Craig A. Wright 

Acting Director 

Air Resources Division 

www.des.nh.gov 

29 Hazen Drive " PO Box 95 " Concord, NH 03302-0095 

(603) 271-3503 " TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0635

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SAUL JAMES DOOLING,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 18, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 11 2023

09/11/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0635
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6605

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SATISH R. SHAH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR92-255-HAR, CA-97-2887-CCB)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Satish R. Shah, Appellant Pro Se. Gary Patrick Jordan, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Raymond Allen

Bonner, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Satish R. Shah seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999),

and his motions for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Shah, Nos. CR-92-255-HAR; CA-97-2887-

CCB (D. Md. Feb. 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### § 3103.1 Fiscal terms.

(a) The table in this section shows the fiscal terms, that the BLM will adjust every 4 years by a final rule. The BLM will adjust the amounts according to the change in the Implicit Price Deflator for Gross Domestic Product since the previous adjustment. The fiscal terms displayed below are effective on June 22, 2024. Per the Inflation Reduction Act, the BLM will not adjust the rental nor the minimum bonus bids until after August 16, 2032.

| Oil and gas (parts 3100, 3110, 3120, 3130, 3140): | Fiscal term |
| --- | --- |
| Competitive oil and gas, tar sand, and combined hydrocarbon leases | Rental of $3 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year during the first 2-year period beginning upon lease issuance, $5 per acre per year, or fraction thereof, for the following 6 years, and then $15 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year thereafter. |
| Competitive lease reinstatement, Class II | Rental of $20 per acre, or fraction thereof. |
| Competitive combined hydrocarbon leases | Minimum bonus bids of $25 per acre, or fraction thereof. |
| Competitive oil and gas and tar sand leases | Minimum bonus bids of $10 per acre, or fraction thereof. |
| Expression of interest filing fee | $5 per acre. |

Table 1 to Paragraph (a)—Fiscal Terms Table

(b) The amounts in the fiscal terms table are not subject to appeal to the Interior Board of Land Appeals pursuant to 43 CFR part 4, subpart E.
### §583. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–206, §3, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 737, which credited funds to the Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians for certain claims, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of microHelix, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Ashton,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
      May 11, 2007








/s/
      Steve G. Ashton


Steve
      G.
      Ashton


President
      and Chief Executive Officer
§ 3135.2 Under what circumstances will BLM require a suspension of operations and production or approve my request for a suspension of operations and production for my lease? ( a ) BLM will require a suspension of operations and production or approve your request for a suspension of operations and production for your lease(s) if BLM determines that— ( 1 ) It is in the interest of conservation of natural resources;
( 2 ) It encourages the greatest ultimate recovery of oil and gas, such as by encouraging the planning and construction of a transportation system to a new area of discovery; or
( 3 ) It mitigates reasonably foreseeable and significantly adverse effects on surface resources.
( b ) BLM will suspend operations and production for your lease if it determines that, despite the exercise of due care and diligence, you can't comply with your lease requirements for reasons beyond your control.
( c ) If BLM requires a suspension of operations and production or approves your request for a suspension of operations and production, the suspension— ( 1 ) Stops the running of your lease term and prevents it from expiring for as long as the suspension is in effect;
( 2 ) Relieves you of your obligation to pay rent, royalty, or minimum royalty during the suspension; and
( 3 ) Prohibits you from operating on, producing from, or having any other beneficial use of your lease during the suspension. However, you must continue to perform necessary maintenance and safety activities.
[67 FR 17886, Apr. 11, 2002]
### **Subchapter F—Bonded and Taxpaid Wine Premises**

Part
I.
Establishment.
II.
Operations.
III.
Cellar treatment and classification of wine.
IV.
General.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter F, Bonded and Taxpaid Wine Premises, consisted of part I, Establishment, part II, Operations, part III, Cellar Treatment and Classification of Wine, and part IV, General, and comprised sections 5351 to 5357, 5361 to 5373, 5381 to 5388, and 5391 to 5392, respectively, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.
#### § 3715.1 Do the regulations in this subpart apply to my use or occupancy?

To determine if the regulations in this subpart apply to your activities, refer to Table 1 in this section.

| Applicability of this subpart | |
| --- | --- |
| If your proposed use of the public lands— | Then— |
| Includes occupancy and is “reasonably incident” as defined by this subpart | The provisions of this subpart apply to you. You must seek concurrence from BLM before beginning this use and comply with all provisions of this subpart. |
| Involves the placement, construction, or maintenance of enclosures, gates, fences, or signs | The provisions of this subpart apply to you. You must seek concurrence from BLM before beginning this use and comply with all provisions of this subpart. |
| Is reasonably incident, but does not involve occupancy | The provisions of this subpart do not apply to you, except for §§ 3715.4, 3715.5 and 3715.7. You are subject to the applicable regulations in 43 CFR part 3800. |
| Is *not* reasonably incident (involving rights-of-way, for example), but may be allowed under the public land laws | The occupancy consultation provisions of this subpart do not apply to you. Your use is not allowed under this subpart. You must seek authorization under 43 CFR Group 2900. |
| Is not allowed under the public land laws, the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, or other applicable laws | Your use is prohibited. You must not begin or continue unauthorized uses. |
| Involves occupancy of a site, or any subsequent site within a 25-mile radius of the initially occupied site, for 14 days or less in any 90-day period | The provisions of this subpart do not apply to you. Refer to the applicable regulations in 43 CFR part 8360 and pertinent State Director supplementary rules. 43 CFR part 8360 will not otherwise apply to a reasonably incident use or occupancy that this subpart allows. |

Table 1
T17N R1W

T17N R3W

T17N R2W

T18N R3W

T18N R2W

T18N R1W

T19N

T R1W

T19N R1W

T19N R3W

T19N R2W

T20N R2W T20N R3W

T20N R1W

COLUSA DRAIN

162

45

GCID LATERAL 25-1

162

GLENN-COLUSA CANAL

45

45

GCID HC-2

GCID LATERAL 41-1

COLUSA TROUGH

CCOOLLUUSSAA CCOO

GGLLEENNNN CC OO

BBUUTTTTEE CC OO

Stegeman

Princeton

Afton

Codora

Butte

City

Glenn

Dodgeland

Bayliss Jacinto

Contract No. 14-06-200-849A-R-1

Exhibit B

Princeton-Codora-Glenn I.D.

725-202-38

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 2.5 5

Miles

Contractor's Service Area

District Boundary

Date: November 4, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\princeton_c_g\princeton_codora_glenn.mxd
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,198.39

 1,198.32

 1,198.48

 1,198.39

 1,198.49

 1,198.42

 1,198.36

 1,198.29

 1,198.23

 1,198.18

 1,198.24

 1,198.70

 1,198.83

 1,198.87

 1,198.85

 1,198.89

 1,198.88

 1,198.85

 1,198.83

 1,198.85

 1,199.13

 1,199.39

 1,199.43

 1,199.72

 1,199.80

 1,199.83

 1,199.83

 1,200.15

 1,200.43

 1,200.63

 205.4

 205.2

 205.6

 205.4

 205.7

 205.4

 205.3

 205.1

 204.9

 204.7

 204.9

 206.3

 206.7

 206.8

 206.7

 206.8

 206.8

 206.7

 206.7

 206.7

 207.5

 208.3

 208.4

 209.3

 209.5

 209.6

 209.6

 210.6

 211.4

 212.0

STORAGE

-0.3

-0.2

+0.5

-0.3

+0.3

-0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.1

+0.2

+1.4

+0.4

+0.1

-0.1

+0.1

+0.0

-0.1

-0.1

+0.1

+0.8

+0.8

+0.1

+0.9

+0.2

+0.1

+0.0

+1.0

+0.8

+0.6

CHANGE

66

99

446

69

349

98

113

100

115

135

289

883

393

259

173

262

185

156

170

230

617

589

269

638

320

245

200

681

622

502

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PP

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

OUTLETS

 0

 3

 9

 3

 0

 2

 2

 4

 4

 10

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9

 4

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .00

 .03

 .10

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .05

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2001 WHISKEYTOWN LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 14, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAP.

C.F.S. * FRANCIS

COMPUTED

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +6.4 9,273 6,000 0 0 56 .62

ACRE-FEET +6.4 18,393 11,901 0 0 111

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

SPILL 0 11,901

 205.6

OUTLET 11,901

TOTAL

JUDGE

CARR PP

(1)

 0

 0

 394

 0

 305

 14

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 713

 1,414

FROM

TO

SPRING CR.

TO CLEAR CR

CLEAR

CR.

NATURAL

FLOW

 66

 99

 52

 69

 44

 84

 113

 100

 115

 135

 289

 883

 393

 259

 173

 262

 185

 156

 170

 230

 617

 589

 269

 638

 320

 245

 200

 681

 622

 502

 8,560

 16,979

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .40

 2.10

 1.97

 1.35

 .01

 .20

 .65

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .75

 2.70

 .02

 2.04

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .35

 3.50

 .06

 16.24

PRECIP

INCHES

PRECIPITATION

 16.24

 20.23

THIS MONTH

JULY 1, 2001 TO DATE

Table 5
§ 3190.2-2 Funding. ( a ) States and Tribes shall provide adequate funding for administration and execution of activities carried out under a delegation or cooperative agreement.
( b ) Reimbursement for allowable costs incurred by a State, Indian tribe or contractor as a result of activities carried out under a delegation of authority, cooperative agreement or contract shall be as negotiated, with the following limitations: ( 1 ) Up to 100 percent for a delegation of authority; or
( 2 ) Up to 100 percent for a cooperative agreement.
( c ) Funding shall be subject to the availability of funds.
( d ) States, Indian tribes or contractors shall maintain financial records relating to the funds received and expended under a delegation of authority, cooperative agreement or contract as specified in the delegation of authority, cooperative agreement or contract.
( e ) Reimbursement shall be at least quarterly and only shall be made upon submission of an invoice or request for reimbursement to the authorized officer.
[52 FR 27182, July 17, 1987, as amended at 62 FR 49586, Sept. 22, 1997]
Sacramen to River

T16N R1W

CCOOLLUUSSAA CC OO

20

29

21

28

17 16

30

19

32

18

31

Arbee 88.7 L

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

Contract No. 14-06-200-7744X-R-1

Exhibit B

Butte Creek Farms, Inc.

725-202-11

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.25 0.5

Miles

Date: October 28, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\butte_creek_farms7744\butte_creek_farms7744.mxd
### §766. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–227, §7, Apr. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 320; Pub. L. 109–126, §4, Dec. 7, 2005, 119 Stat. 2547, which related to transfer of real property for reservation and plan for enlargement, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**EXHIBIT99.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vision-Sciences, Inc. (the“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,Katsumi Oneda, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James A. Tracy,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

                                    (1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

                                    (2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Dated:   November 14, 2002 |   | /s/ Katsumi Oneda       |
|---------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                            |   | Katsumi Oneda           |
|                            |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                            |   |                    |
| Dated:   November 14, 2002 |   | /s/ James A. Tracy      |
|                            |   | James A. Tracy          |
|                            |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

25

----
### **CHAPTER 23—FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT TAX ACT**

Sec.
3301.
Rate of tax.
3302.
Credits against tax.
3303.
Conditions of additional credit allowance.
3304.
Approval of State laws.
3305.
Applicability of State law.
3306.
Definitions.
3307.
Deductions as constructive payments.
3308.
Instrumentalities of the United States.
3309.
State law coverage of services performed for nonprofit organizations or governmental entities.
3310.
Judicial review.
3311.
Short title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–566, title I, §115(c)(4), Oct. 20, 1976, 90 Stat. 2671, substituted "services performed for nonprofit organizations or governmental entities" for "certain services performed for nonprofit organizations and for State hospitals and institutions of higher education" in item 3309.

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–373, title I, §§104(b)(2), 131(b)(3), Aug. 10, 1970, 84 Stat. 699, 705, added items 3309 and 3310 and redesignated former item 3309 as 3311.

**1960**—Pub. L. 86–778, title V, §531(d)(2), Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 984, added item 3308 and redesignated former item 3308 as 3309.
### **Subchapter B—Receiverships, Etc.**

Sec.
6871.
Claims for income, estate, gift, and certain excise taxes in receivership proceedings, etc.
6872.
Suspension of period on assessment.
6873.
Unpaid claims.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1980**—Pub. L. 96–589, §6(g)(3)(A), (B), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3410, substituted "Receiverships, Etc." for "Bankruptcy and Receiverships" in subchapter heading, and "gift, and certain excise taxes in receivership proceedings, etc." for "and gift taxes in bankruptcy and receivership proceedings" in item 6871.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

(In thousands of dollars, except per share data)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                               Nine Months Ended September 30,
                                                               -------------------------------
                                                                   2001               2000
                                                               ------------       ------------
<S>                                                            <C>                <C>
Numerator:
  Net income (loss)                                            $   (778,427)      $    440,760

  Effect of dilutive securities:
    Convertible debt - 2.625% issued in 1998                          7,019*             7,358
    Convertible debt - 1.5% issued in 1999                            6,975*             7,313
    LYONS - 1996 issue                                                 (225)*             (364)
    LYONS - 1998 issue                                                3,426*             3,427
    Less: Anti-dilutive items                                        17,195                 --
                                                               ------------       ------------
Numerator for net income (loss) per common share - diluted     $   (778,427)      $    458,494
                                                               ------------       ------------

Denominator:
  Weighted average common shares                                    590,015            370,099

  Effect of dilutive securities:
    Stock options and common stock warrants                          14,063*            10,063
    Convertible debt - 2.625% issued in 1998                          9,282*             9,282
    Convertible debt - 1.5% issued in 1999                            9,454*             9,454
    LYONS - 1996 issue                                                2,324*             3,871
    LYONS - 1998 issue                                                3,085*             3,085
    Less: Anti-dilutive items                                        38,208                 --
                                                               ------------       ------------
Denominator for net income per common share - diluted               590,015            405,854
                                                               ------------       ------------

Net income (loss) per common share:
  Basic                                                        $      (1.32)      $       1.19
                                                               ------------       ------------

  Diluted                                                      $      (1.32)      $       1.13
                                                               ------------       ------------
</Table>

* Denotes items that are anti-dilutive to the calculation of earnings per share.
#### Charles McNamee, Respondent, *v.*Alston Wilson, Appellant.

(Argued May 28, 1878;

decided May 28, 1878.)

*James 8. Stearns*for appellant.

*George W. Blunt*for respondent.

Agree to affirm on argument.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.