alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Damberg, Rich

From: Brachtl, Megan

Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 4:20 PM

To: Damberg, Rich

Subject: FW: PM2.5 NAAQS SIP NPRM: Additional Interagency Comments

Incoming #3

Megan V. Brachtl, Group Leader

State and Local Programs Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(919) 541‐2648

brachtl.megan@epa.gov

From: Szabo, Aaron [mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov]  

Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 4:27 PM

To: Ling, Michael; Brachtl, Megan

Subject: PM2.5 NAAQS SIP NPRM: Additional Interagency Comments

Based on our interagency discussion, below is the language provided by the reviewer as comment:

  

Section IX.B.1.d. Insert  the following after “In the December 2012 PM NAAQS final rule the EPA established a new

health‐based primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS of 12.0 μg/m3. In that same action the EPA retained the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS of 15.0 μg/m3 as a secondary NAAQS to protect against certain welfare effects.”

  

“In the 1997 PM2.5 designation rule (70 FR 944), EPA designated areas nonattainment under both the primary and

secondary 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS which were identical. Designations for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS made in January 2015 (80

FR  2206) designated areas under the 2012 PM2.5 primary standard and did not “redesignate” areas for the 1997 PM2.5

secondary standard. Therefore, at this time, all areas designated nonattainment in 2005 for the 1997 PM2.5 standard

are considered as having been designated nonattainment for the 1997 PM2.5 primary NAAQS and for the 1997 PM2.5

secondary NAAQS where such distinctions are made below. Similarly, any 1997 PM2.5 nonattainment areas that have

approved redesignation requests for attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, the redesignation applies to both the

primary and second 1997 PM2.5 standards.”

  

  

Aaron L. Szabo

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

202‐395‐3621

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
#### § 3582.1-2 Hardrock minerals.

Except as otherwise specifically provided in this subpart, leasing of deposits of hardrock minerals shall be governed by regulations in parts 3500 and 3560 of this title.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA methodology for designing aircraft to low sonic boom constraintsA method for designing conceptual supersonic cruise aircraft to meet low sonic boom requirements is outlined and described. The aircraft design is guided through a systematic evolution from initial three view drawing to a final numerical model description, while the designer using the method controls the integration of low sonic boom, high supersonic aerodynamic efficiency, adequate low speed handling, and reasonable structure and materials technologies. Some experience in preliminary aircraft design and in the use of various analytical and numerical codes is required for integrating the volume and lift requirements throughout the design process.Document ID19910008792Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMack, Robert J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Needleman, Kathy E.*(Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co. Hampton, VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1991Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberL-16768NAS 1.15:4246NASA-TM-4246Accession Number91N18105Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 537-03-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910008792.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §4355. Effect

Nothing in this chapter alters, or demonstrates congressional support for the alteration of, the legal relationship between the United States and any American Indian, Alaska Native, or Native Hawaiian individual, group, organization, or entity.

(Pub. L. 114–221, §6, Sept. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 851.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 751

 724

 704

 700

 703

 705

 713

 742

 752

 752

 755

 734

 745

 732

 681

 668

 631

 622

 615

 613

 603

 591

 583

 567

 579

 576

 573

 566

 566

 571

 582

 716

 707

 664

 687

 689

 616

 697

 712

 742

 743

 739

 716

 732

 621

 660

 628

 614

 608

 601

 597

 583

 573

 555

 546

 562

 563

 561

 557

 552

 559

 571

 732

 715

 690

 694

 698

 694

 704

 729

 747

 747

 749

 728

 739

 662

 672

 644

 620

 616

 608

 602

 592

 580

 563

 557

 571

 569

 566

 563

 558

 565

 577

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
### PART II—LEVY

Sec.
6331.
Levy and distraint.
6332.
Surrender of property subject to levy.
6333.
Production of books.
6334.
Property exempt from levy.
6335.
Sale of seized property.
6336.
Sale of perishable goods.
6337.
Redemption of property.
6338.
Certificate of sale; deed of real property.
6339.
Legal effect of certificate of sale of personal property and deed of real property.
6340.
Records of sale.
6341.
Expense of levy and sale.
6342.
Application of proceeds of levy.
6343.
Authority to release levy and return property.
6344.
Cross references.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1998**—Pub. L. 105–206, title III, §3401(b), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 749, added part heading.

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–719, title I, §104(j), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1138, inserted "and return property" in item 6343.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ignacio GONZALEZ-MACIAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40676.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

*288Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ignacio Gonzalez-Macias raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 3590.0-2 Policy.

The regulations in this part are administered under the direction of the Director, Bureau of Land Management.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph Bravatta, Appellant, against Vernon A. Morhous, as Warden of Great Meadow Prison, Respondent.

*898All concur.
(No. 1128

Claimant awarded $512.92.)

#### E. M. Sorrells, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 12, 1927.*

*Reimbursement*— when *award may he made to State employee.*An employee of the State who has expended moneys for board and lodging, while in the performance of his duty, may be reimbursed by the State for moneys so expended.

Angerstein & Schneider, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The declaration filed in this case alleges that claimant is one of the arbitrators of the Industrial Commission of the State of Illinois, having been duly appointed as arbitrator by Honorable Len Small, Governor of .the State of Illinois, and that he has since the date of his appointment qualified, acting as 'one of the arbitrators of the Industrial Com-' mission of the State of Illinois; that he is a resident of the city of East St. Louis in St. Clair county, Illinois, and that his duties as arbitrator require his presence in Chicago and other cities for the purpose of hearing and determining cases, and that during the months of February, March and April, 1925, claimant made trips from East St. Louis to Chicago and *373return and was by reason of Ms duties compelled to remain in CMcago during various periods of time, paying in said city Ms board and room during the time that he was required by his duties to remain there; that during the month of May, 1925, he was required in the performance of his duties to make a trip to Dixon and Galena, and during the month of June to make a trip to Cairo, Metropolis and other towns in the southern part of the State; that during the month of May he was also required to remain in CMcago for various periods of time and to make trips from Chicago to East St. Louis and that during the month of June he was also required in furtherance of his duties to be and remain in Chicago during . the month of June, 1925, and to pay board and room while in said city; that he was compelled during said period of time to pay out for meals and lodging while in the city of Chicago $388.00 and for railroad fare the sum of $194.92, making a total of $512.92, and that he has not been reimbursed for same.

A demurrer filed by the Attorney General to the declaration is sustained as a matter of law.

It appears from an examination of the case that subsequently expenses of a like nature were paid to this arbitrator and other arbitrators similar to this, and that same are now being- approved and paid.

We accordingly award claimant the sum of $512.92.
#### Saul J. Baron, Appellant, v. Andrew Albright, Jr., Respondent, Impleaded with Another.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    In accordance with § 271.25 of its rules regarding availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting held on August 10, 2004.[1] 

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee in the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with increasing the federal funds rate to an average of around 1-1/2 percent.

By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, September 27, 2004.

Vincent R. Reinhart,

Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.

# Footnotes

1.                             Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee meeting on August 10, 2004, which includes the domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551.  The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's annual report.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 04-22208 Field 10-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE   CONTAINS   SUMMARY   FINANCIAL   INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 1,
1998 AND  THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF  INCOME  FOR  THE
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 1, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                NOV-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-01-1998
<CASH>                                           14,964,883
<SECURITIES>                                      2,374,254
<RECEIVABLES>                                    12,907,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                        823,990
<INVENTORY>                                      12,214,810
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 45,283,596
<PP&E>                                           80,740,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                   40,927,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   96,913,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11,551,277
<BONDS>                                           5,595,507
<COMMON>                                          2,719,712
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       73,200,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     96,913,892
<SALES>                                          16,728,701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 19,208,525
<CGS>                                            11,292,515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    11,292,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     15,699
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  163,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,140,906
<INCOME-TAX>                                        399,318
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 741,588
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        741,588
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .03
        

</TABLE>
§ 3141.10 General. ( a ) Combined hydrocarbons or tar sands within a Special Tar Sand Area will be leased only by competitive bonus bidding.
( b ) Oil and gas within a Special Tar Sand Area will be leased by competitive bonus bidding as described in 43 CFR part 3120.
( c ) The authorized officer may issue either combined hydrocarbon leases, or oil and gas leases for oil and gas within such areas.
( d ) The rights to explore for or develop tar sand deposits in a Special Tar Sand Area may be acquired through either a combined hydrocarbon lease or a tar sand lease.
( e ) An oil and gas lease in a Special Tar Sand Area does not include the rights to explore for or develop tar sand.
( f ) A tar sand lease in a Special Tar Sand Area does not include the rights to explore for or develop oil and gas.
( g ) The minimum acceptable bid for a lease issued for tar sand will be as specified in § 3103.1 of this chapter.
( h ) The acreage of combined hydrocarbon leases or tar sand leases held within a Special Tar Sand Area will not be charged against acreage limitations for the holding of oil and gas leases as provided in 43 CFR 3101.21.
( i ) ( 1 ) The authorized officer may noncompetitively lease additional lands for ancillary facilities in a Special Tar Sand Area that are shown by an applicant to be needed to support any operations necessary for the recovery of tar sand. Such uses include, but are not limited to, mill siting or waste disposal. An application for a lease or permit to use additional lands must be filed under the provisions of 43 CFR part 2920 with the proper BLM office having jurisdiction of the lands. The application for additional lands may be filed at the time a plan of operations is filed.
( 2 ) A lease for the use of additional lands will not be issued under this part when the use can be authorized under 43 CFR part 2800. Such uses include, but are not limited to, reservoirs, pipelines, electrical generation systems, transmission lines, roads and railroads.
( 3 ) Within units of the National Park System, permits or leases for additional lands for any purpose will be issued only by the National Park Service. Applications for such permits or leases must be filed with the Regional Director of the National Park Service.
#### § 19.8 Prospecting, mineral locations, mineral patents, and mineral leasing within National Forest Wilderness.

Regulations issued under the provisions of the Wilderness Act pertaining to prospecting, mineral locations, mineral patents, and mineral leasing within National Forest Wilderness are contained in parts 3327 and 3638 of subchapter C of chapter II of this title.

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

See Redesignation Table No. 2 of 43 CFR, which appears in Volume II of the List of CFR Sections Affected, 1964-1972, for the appropriate sections to former parts 3327 and 3638.
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed February 18, 2020 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-95-00110-CV

OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, Appellant V. ALTON RAY JEFFERSON, SR., JOSE PHINE JEFFERSON, ROBERT ECHOL BOLEWARE, JR., ELLEN BOLEWARE, JOHN ALFRED CLEMENTS, MARY CLEMENTS, FRED M. MORAN, JR., M ARY SUE WRIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE E STATE OF ALVIE WRIGHT, DECEASED , RUFUS KIMMON BOX, MARY BOX, RIC HARD USLESS PARNELL, HELEN PARNELL, ARNOLD FRANKLIN EARNEST, B ETTY EARNEST, PERRY JOSEPH BROADHEAD, MARY BROADHEAD, T HOMAS GLEN YOUNG, EDITH YOUNG, ROBERT STONE BROOKS, VIDA MAE BR OOKS, HOYET FRANKLIN PETERSON, JOYCE PETERSON, JOHN HENRY NIEDER GESES, MAGDALENE NIEDERGESES, WILLIAM LEE KELLEY, ROSA LEE KELLEY, RICHARD ALLEN BODDIE, SADIE BODDIE, HOUSTON A. YEAGER, LOWELL EDGAR HAMBURGER, AND BRINDA HAMBURGER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 94-7824-G



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Wh itehill, and Pedersen, III Opinion by Justice Whitehill We reinstate this appeal. The appeal was abated to allow the p arties to pursue a settlement.

Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss th e appeal because the parties

have settled their differences.–2– We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

950110F.P05 /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, Appellant

No. 05-95-00110-CV V.

ALTON RAY JEFFERSON, SR., JOSEPHINE JEFFERSON, ROBERT ECHOL BOLEWARE, JR., ELLEN BOLEWARE, JOHN ALFRED CLEMENTS, MARY CLEMENTS, FRED M. MORAN, JR., MARY SUE WRIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ALVIE WRIGHT, DECEASED, RUFUS KIMMON BOX, MARY BOX, RICHARD USLESS PARNELL, HELEN PARNELL, ARNOLD FRANKLIN EARNEST, BETTY EARNEST, PERRY JOSEPH BROADHEAD, MARY BROADHEAD, THOMAS GLEN YOUNG, EDITH YOUNG, ROBERT STONE BROOKS, VIDA MAE BROOKS, HOYET FRANKLIN PETERSON, JOYCE PETERSON, JOHN HENRY NIEDERGESES, MAGDALENE NIEDERGESES, WILLIAM LEE KELLEY, ROSA LEE KELLEY, RICHARD ALLEN BODDIE, On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 94-7824-G. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. Justices Myers and Pedersen, III participating.–4– SADIE BODDIE, HOUSTON A. YEAGER, LOWELL EDGAR HAMBURGER, AND BRINDA HAMBURGER, Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that the parties bear the ir own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered February 18, 2020
§ 2.225 Federal Register notices describing systems of records. ( a ) The Privacy Act requires publication of a notice in the Federal Register describing each system of records subject to the Act. Such notice will be published prior to the establishment or a revision of the system of records. 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4).
( b ) Each bureau shall notify the Departmental Privacy Act Officer promptly of any modifications or amendments which are required in the then-current notice describing a system of records for which it is responsible.
( c ) A bureau desiring to establish a new system of records or a new use for an existing system of records shall notify the Departmental Privacy Act Officer, no fewer than ninety (90) calendar days in advance.
[48 FR 56583, Dec. 22, 1983]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          52,634
<SECURITIES>                                   154,944
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,920
<INVENTORY>                                     45,956
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               333,966
<PP&E>                                          57,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 374,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,793
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,519
<OTHER-SE>                                     335,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   374,633
<SALES>                                        208,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               208,554
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,013
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,733
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,280
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.36<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35
<FN>
<F1> The amount is reported as EPS BASIC, NOT PRIMARY.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>