alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §131. Advances to disbursing officers

No superintendent of Indian affairs, or Indian agent, or other disbursing officer in such service, shall have advanced to him, on Indian or public account, any money to be disbursed in future, until such superintendent, agent, or officer in such service has settled his accounts of the preceding year, and has satisfactorily shown that all balances in favor of the Government, which may appear to be in his hands, are ready to be paid over on the order of the Secretary of the Interior.

(R.S. §2092.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2092 derived from act June 27, 1846, ch. 34, §1, 9 Stat. 20.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Indian Agents

The services of Indian agents have been dispensed with. See note set out under section 64 of this title.

#### Superintendent of Indian Affairs

No appropriation for any superintendent of Indian affairs has been made since act Mar. 3, 1877, ch. 101, §1, 19 Stat. 271.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Transfer of disbursement functions of all Government agencies with certain exceptions to the Fiscal Service, Treasury Department, see note set out under section 53 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial infomration extracted from
     ULTRONICS CORPORATION  March 31, 1997 financial statements and is 
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894556
<NAME>                        ULTRONICS CORPORATION

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Little Home for Friendless Animals, Inc., Appellant, against Russell P. Koehler et al., as Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Islip, Respondents.

In a proceeding to procure from the zoning board of appeals of the town of Islip a permit to maintain a dog kennel, order denying appellant’s motion to compel issuance of such permit unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appellant did not establish the existence of a nonconforming use of the property at the time of the application for a permit. *(Curtiss-Wright Gorp.*v. *Village of Garden City,*270 App. Div. 936, affd. 296 N. Y. 839.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. ISee *post,*p. 910.]
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the matter of the application of 

POLYNESIAN LIMITED

for an emergency exemption pursuant to 

49 U.S.C 40109(g) (Pago Pago-Manu’a Islands)

DOCKET DOT-OST-2014-0144

 

 

RESPONSE OF INTER ISLAND AIRWAYS, INC. TO APPLICATION 

OF POLYNESIAN LIMTED FOR AN EMERERGENCY EXEMPTION

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Alex Sene, Jr.

President

P.O. Box 4929

Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799

Tel: 1+684+633-7002

Fax: 1+684+633-5727

 Email: alex.sene@interislandair.com

August 27, 2014
2

BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the matter of the application of 

POLYNESIAN LIMITED

for an emergency exemption pursuant to 

49 U.S.C 40109(g)

(Pago Pago-Manu’a Islands)

DOCKET DOT-OST-2014-0144

 

 

RESPONSE TO APPLICATION FOR AN EMERGENCY EXEMPTION

Inter Island Airways, Inc. does not object to the application by Polynesian Limited 

(“Polynesian”), under 49 U.S.C. 40109(g) and Subpart C of the Department’s Rules of 

Practice, 14 C.F.R. 302,301 for an emergency and time-limited(90 days) exemption 

authorizing Polynesian to engage in air transportation of persons, property and mail 

between Pago Pago, American Samoa and regional airports Fitiuta Airport on the island 

of Ta’u and the Ofu Airport of the island of Ofu located in the Manu’a Islands of 

American Samoa.

Inter Island Airways, Inc. requests that it be granted an opportunity to comment should 

Polynesian file an extension beyond the time-limited (90 days) exemption it is currently 

seeking from the Department.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________

ALEX SENE, JR.

President
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have on this 27th day of August 2014, the foregoing Response of 

Inter Island Airways, Inc. to Polynesian has been serviced on this day with the following 

individuals via email:

_______________________

Alex Sene, Jr.

President

Charles F. Donley II

Squire, Patton Boggs L.L.P

1201 19th Street, NW Suite 300

Washington, D.C. 20036

Email: charles.donley@squirepb.com

Counsel for Polynesian Ltd.

Taimalelagi, Dr. Claire Tuia Poumele, Director

Department of Port Administration

P.O. Box 656

Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799

Email: claire.poumele@pa.as.gov
#### Louis Levy, Respondent, v. Earle Bailie et al., Defendants, and Ernest W. Hill et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No opinion. Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., not voting.
October 2021

STORAGE 1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION** PRECIP**

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW

C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

710.4

1 2,218.15 706.8 -3.7 90 1,478 0 401 56 0.27 0.00

2 2,217.54 702.5 -4.3 -866 747 0 501 37 0.18 0.00

3 2,216.92 698.2 -4.3 5 1,467 0 681 35 0.17 0.00

4 2,216.31 694.0 -4.2 -55 1,465 0 568 39 0.19 0.00

5 2,215.74 690.1 -3.9 -104 1,455 0 391 30 0.15 0.00

6 2,215.30 687.0 -3.0 43 1,449 0 81 34 0.17 0.00

7 2,214.75 683.3 -3.8 -24 1,457 0 379 34 0.17 0.00

8 2,214.17 679.3 -3.9 -25 1,454 0 484 24 0.12 0.00

9 2,213.60 675.5 -3.8 10 1,454 0 477 20 0.10 0.00

10 2,213.04 671.7 -3.8 -6 1,457 0 394 45 0.23 0.00

11 2,212.39 667.4 -4.3 -93 1,463 0 608 24 0.12 0.00

12 2,211.83 663.6 -3.7 24 1,471 0 396 37 0.19 0.00

13 2,211.25 659.8 -3.8 3 1,474 0 444 19 0.10 0.00

14 2,210.66 655.9 -3.9 58 1,476 0 523 17 0.09 0.00

15 2,210.12 652.4 -3.5 97 1,466 0 396 19 0.10 0.00

16 2,209.67 649.5 -2.9 104 1,421 0 139 23 0.12 0.00

17 2,209.40 647.7 -1.8 7 638 0 222 33 0.17 0.00

18 2,209.16 646.1 -1.6 73 858 0 0 2 0.01 0.06

19 2,209.01 645.2 -1.0 287 760 0 0 19 0.10 0.00

20 2,208.78 643.7 -1.5 262 1,002 0 0 10 0.05 0.27

21 2,208.76 643.5 -0.1 666 723 0 0 8 0.04 0.03

22 2,209.55 648.7 5.1 3,490 894 0 0 10 0.05 1.22

23 2,209.61 649.1 0.4 1,045 837 0 0 11 0.06 0.04

24 2,210.85 657.2 8.1 4,410 308 0 0 14 0.07 2.00

25 2,211.36 660.5 3.4 2,000 300 0 0 4 0.02 0.73

26 2,211.61 662.2 1.7 1,198 360 0 0 4 0.02 0.11

27 2,211.95 664.4 2.2 1,447 313 0 0 0 0.00 0.38

28 2,212.20 666.1 1.7 1,287 441 0 0 6 0.03 0.00

29 2,212.38 667.3 1.2 961 350 0 0 6 0.03 0.00

30 2,212.55 668.4 1.1 875 295 0 0 8 0.04 0.00

31 2,212.73 669.6 1.2 917 296 0 0 16 0.08 0.16

TOTALS -40.7 18,186 31,029 0 7,085 644 3.24 5.00

ACRE-FEET -40,700 36,072 61,546 0 14,053 1,277

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

 ** Evaporation and precipitation records taken from station at Trinity River Hatchery.

Precipitation

This month = 5.00

October 01, 2021 To date = 5.00

SUMMARY 

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 61,546 Outlet 14,053

Spill 0

Total 75599.119

Historical Archive and Report Database

Trinity Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/24/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4806 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4806

 To authorize the Secretary of Defense to use amounts available to the 
Department of Defense for operation and maintenance to remove munitions 
       and explosives of concern in Guam, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 8, 2022

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Defense to use amounts available to the 
Department of Defense for operation and maintenance to remove munitions 
       and explosives of concern in Guam, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guarding against Unexploded Arms and 
Munitions Act'' or the ``GUAM Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF AMOUNTS AVAILABLE TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR OPERATION 
              AND MAINTENANCE FOR REMOVAL OF MUNITIONS AND EXPLOSIVES 
              OF CONCERN IN GUAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense may use amounts available 
to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance to remove 
munitions and explosives of concern from military installations in 
Guam.
    (b) Monitoring of Removal.--The Secretary shall monitor and assess 
the removal by the Department of munitions and explosives of concern 
from military installations in Guam and shall constantly update 
processes for such removal to mitigate any issues relating to such 
removal.
    (c) Report on Amounts Necessary.--Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report indicating 
the amounts necessary to conduct removal of munitions and explosives of 
concern from military installations in Guam.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term 
        ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
                    (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the 
                Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on 
                Appropriations of the Senate; and
                    (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the 
                Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on 
                Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
            (2) Munitions and explosives of concern.--The term 
        ``munitions and explosives of concern'' has the meaning given 
        that term in section 179.3 of title 32, Code of Federal 
        Regulations, or successor regulations.
                                 <all>
```
#### Abraham Weber, Respondent, v. Otto Deutschberger, Appellant.

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
#### Watterson, administrator, *v.*Stubbs *&*Hodges.

November 18, 1910.

Holden, J.

Upon an application of the plaintiff in error, for an injunction and other relief, the court granted a temporary restraining order enjoining the defendants in error from “cutting, felling, or removing the timber described in plaintiff’s petition, going upon said lands, or otherwise interfering therewith.” Before there was any hearing involving the grant or refusal of an interlocutory injunction, upon application of the defendants in error and without notice to the plaintiff in error the court granted an order providing that the restraining order be so modified that the defendants be authorized “to proceed with the construction of their tramroad across said land” upon giving a bond required by the order, and further providing that in the event the plaintiff failed to give a bond required of him to indemnify the defendants against damages incurred by reason of the suit, the restraining order be dissolved if the defendants gave bond in'a named sum to answer damages they might cause the plaintiff by the cutting of the timber, etc.; to which order the plaintiff in error filed exceptions.

*Held,*that the order to which exceptions are filed, not having been granted at any hearing involving the grant or refusal of any interlocutory injunction, and being merely an order upon certain conditions modifying, and under certain contingencies dissolving, a temporary restraining order-, was not subject to review by “fast writ” of error; and such order not being a final adjudication of the ease, the writ of error is dismissed. *Harris*v. *City of Sparta,*130 *Ga.*60 (60 S. E. 192) ; *Berry*v. *Parker,*130 *Ga.*741 (61 S. E. 541).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*369Petition for injunction. Before Judge Mitchell. Tift superior-court. May 27, 1910.

*Hendricks & Christian,*for plaintiff.

*Fulwood & Murray,*for defendants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                        5


<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 3983314
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         20846263
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                           17166090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      44515034
<PP&E>                                                20776718
<DEPRECIATION>                                         5810522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       100365382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 19154090
<BONDS>                                               32068490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                770441
<OTHER-SE>                                            45424634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         100365382
<SALES>                                               18929967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      18929967
<CGS>                                                  8954427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          8954427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       7742933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      649334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        1677844
<INCOME-TAX>                                            458698
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    1219146
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           1219146
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.14



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of  J. ALLEN GREER INC., (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB /A, 1st Amendment , for the year
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Ericksteen, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Kevin
Ericksteen


Kevin
Ericksteen


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Date:  September
5, 2008
----

|   | 1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and   results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 12, 2011 |   | By:    | /s/ John A. MacDonald                                                 |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   |   | John MacDonaldChief Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer |   |
§ 3137.40 What initial development obligations must I define in a unit agreement? Your unit agreement must define— ( a ) The number of wells you anticipate will be necessary to assess the reservoir adequately;
( b ) A primary target for each well;
( c ) A schedule for starting and completing drilling operations for each well; and
( d ) The time between starting operations on a well to the start of operations on the next well.
### SERVED: OCTOBER 19, 2015
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF

CARGOQUIN, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-3308 (Civil Penalty Action)



### NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2014SW700164) has been assigned to Admiriistrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regardingthis proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment-Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl0001



### Alberto Alarcon, Respondent's Counsel 

### HALL, QUINTANILLA & 

### ALARCON 1302 Washington St. Laredo, TX 78040 TEL: 956-723-5527 FAX: 956-723-8168 James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

### Enforcement Division, Southwest Federal Aviation Administration 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76177 TEL: 817-222-5074 FAX: 817-222-5945 ONE COPY



### Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-3308 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Timothy J. Koziol,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
General Environmental Management, Inc. for the quarterly period
ending September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of General
Environmental Management, Inc. of Nevada.




Date:
November 14, 2008
 /s/
      Timothy J. KoziolTimothy
      J. Koziol
                  President,
      CEO, andChairman of
      the Board of Directors
                  November 14, 2008
### §413. Fees to cover cost of work performed for Indians

The Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized, in his discretion, and under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, to collect reasonable fees to cover the cost of any and all work performed for Indian tribes or for individual Indians, to be paid by vendees, lessees, or assignees, or deducted from the proceeds of sale, leases, or other sources of revenue: Provided, That the amounts so collected shall be covered into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts, except when the expenses of the work are paid from Indian tribal funds, in which event they shall be credited to such funds.

(Feb. 14, 1920, ch. 75, §1, 41 Stat. 415; Mar. 1, 1933, ch. 158, 47 Stat. 1417.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1933—Act Mar. 1, 1933, substituted "to collect reasonable fees to cover the cost of any and all work performed for Indian tribes or individual Indians" for "to charge a reasonable fee for the work incident to the sale, leasing, or assigning of such lands, or in the sale of the timber, or in the administration of Indian forests" and "deducted from the proceeds of sale, leases, or other sources of revenue" for "from the proceeds of sales", struck out introductory text "In the sale of all Indian allotments, or in leases, or assignment of leases covering, tribal or allotted lands for mineral, farming, grazing, business or other purposes, or in the sale of timber thereon" and provided for the use of discretion and the crediting of Indian tribal funds.
#### § 3481.4-1 Can I temporarily interrupt coal severance and still be qualified as producing?

Yes, a temporary interruption in coal severance allows you (the lessee/operator) to halt the extraction of coal for a limited period of time without jeopardizing your qualifications under section (2)(a)(2)(A) of MLA to receive additional leases. During the period of a temporary interruption in coal severance, BLM still considers you lease or LMU to be producing so as not to preclude you from receiving a new or transferred lease.

[62 FR 44370, Aug. 20, 1997]