alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALL COUNTIES PROFESSIONAL SECURITIES INC.; et al, Defendants, Maximo Aguilera Trejo; Irene Morales, Individually and as representative of the Estates of Miguel Aguilera Morales and Juan Carlos Aguilera Morales, Deceased, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 05-51153.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

John C. Tollefson, Goins, Underkofler, Crawford & Langdon, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Raul S. Pastrana, Gus David Oppermann, V, Folger, Wheat & Oppermann, Houston, TX, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

*566PER CURIAM: *

Nautilus Insurance Company (“Plaintiff’) filed suit in the U.S. District Court in Austin, Texas against All Counties Professional Securities, Inc. (“ACPS”) and other named individuals, alleging jurisdiction on the basis of diversity of citizenship and seeking a declaratory judgment that Plaintiff was not obligated under a commercial general liability policy issued by Plaintiff to ACPS to provide a defense for and/or indemnify ACPS against claims asserted by the other defendants in a state court action in the 250th Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas. On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court ruled that the claims asserted in the underlying state court action fell within the language of an express liquor liability exclusion in the commercial liability policy and granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff. ACPS and the other defendants appealed to this Court.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts, the relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by the district court in its order entered July 11, 2005, we affirm the judgment entered by the district court that Plaintiff has no duty to defend or indemnify ACPS under the policy of insurance issued by Plaintiff to ACPS.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 3137.88 What happens when a well outside a participating area does not meet the productivity criteria?

If a well outside any of the established participating area(s) does not meet the productivity criteria, all operations on that well are non-unit operations and we will not revise the participating area. You must notify BLM within 60 calendar days after you determine a well does not meet the productivity criteria. You must conduct non-unit operations under the terms of the underlying lease or other federally-approved cooperative oil and gas agreements.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 I,
        Timothy J. Kozoil, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
        Report on Form 10QSB of General Environmental Management, Inc. for the quarterly
        period ending June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
        contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB fairly presents in all material
        respects the financial condition and results of operations of General
        Environmental Management, Inc. of Nevada.
  Date:
            August  14,
            2007
 /s/
                    Timothy J.
                    KozoilName:
                    Timothy J.
                    KoziolTitle:
                    President, CEO, and Chairman of the Board of Directors
EERE Information Center Search Help More Search Options Printable Version 

## Small Electric Motors Analytical Spreadsheets This page presents the analytical spreadsheets associated with the preliminary technical support document (TSD) for small electric motors. Life Cycle Cost Spreadsheet Small Electric Motors Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 542 KB ) National Impact Analysis Small Electric Motors National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 616 KB ) Instructions on how to use these spreadsheets can be found in the appendices to the preliminary TSD

. 

### Contact Information James Raba Project Manager (202) 586-8654 Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy| USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 01/15/2009 

### Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Small Electric Motors... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standard s/commercial...

1 of 1 1/27/2009 1:59 P M
### §61. Estimates for personal services in Indian Office

Annual estimates in detail shall be submitted for all personal services required in the Indian Office, and it shall not be lawful to employ in said office any personal services other than those specifically appropriated for in the legislative, executive, and judicial appropriation Acts, except temporary details of field employees for service connected solely with their respective employments.

(Aug. 23, 1912, ch. 350, §1, 37 Stat. 396.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF AUGUST
31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           15,716,842
<SECURITIES>                                      4,172,553
<RECEIVABLES>                                    16,825,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1,112,957
<INVENTORY>                                      10,655,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 49,674,382
<PP&E>                                           80,047,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                   38,883,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  105,089,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            14,779,175
<BONDS>                                           7,090,870
<COMMON>                                          2,708,457
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       76,795,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    105,089,252
<SALES>                                          30,018,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 34,137,907
<CGS>                                            19,782,608
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    19,782,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     15,699
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  189,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6,654,074
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,328,928
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4,325,146
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4,325,146
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .18
        

</TABLE>
#### § 3400.3-4 Trust protection lands.

The regulations in this group do not apply to the leasing and development of coal deposits held in trust by the United States for Indians. See 43 CFR 3400.0-5(o). Regulations governing those deposits are found in 25 CFR Chapter I.

[44 FR 42609, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33134, July 30, 1982]
§ 3504.71 When will BLM release my bond? ( a ) BLM will release your bond when we have determined, after the passage of a reasonable period of time, that you have done the following: ( 1 ) Paid all royalties, rentals, penalties, and assessments;
( 2 ) Satisfied all permit or lease obligations;
( 3 ) Reclaimed the site; and
( 4 ) Taken effective measures to ensure that the mineral prospecting or development activities will not adversely affect surface or subsurface resources.
( b ) If you assign your lease or permit, BLM will release your bond after we determine that you met the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. Also, your assignee must provide an acceptable bond or other surety.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4461 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4461

To reauthorize the program for mental health awareness training grants, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 23, 2022

Ms. Rosen (for herself and Mr. Cassidy) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the program for mental health awareness training grants, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Access to Mental Health 
Training Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS TRAINING GRANTS.

    Section 520J(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290bb-
41(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``youth and their'' 
        after ``to refer'';
            (2) in paragraph (5)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking the period 
                and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) suicide intervention and prevention, 
                including recognizing warning signs and referring 
                someone for help, including referrals for culturally 
                and linguistically appropriates services.'';
            (3) by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (8);
            (4) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
            ``(7) Technical assistance.--The Secretary may provide 
        technical assistance to grantees in carrying out this section, 
        which may include assistance with--
                    ``(A) program evaluation and improvement, as 
                necessary;
                    ``(B) dissemination and implementation of evidence-
                based programs;
                    ``(C) operational and administrative activities;
                    ``(D) data collection and reporting;
                    ``(E) facilitating collaboration and information 
                sharing among grantees; and
                    ``(F) other activities as the Secretary determines 
                appropriate.''; and
            (5) in paragraph (8), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``$14,693,000 for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022'' and 
        inserting ``$54,963,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 
        2027''.
                                 <all>
```
### §713f. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 98–165, §8, Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1068, which related to the establishment of a tribal reservation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon Reservation

Pub. L. 100–425, Sept. 9, 1988, 102 Stat. 1594, as amended by Pub. L. 100–581, title II, §202, Nov. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2939; Pub. L. 101–301, §4, May 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 207; Pub. L. 102–497, §1, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3255; Pub. L. 103–263, §5(a), May 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 708; Pub. L. 103–435, §2, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4566; Pub. L. 105–256, §2, Oct. 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 1896; Pub. L. 114–263, §1, Dec. 14, 2016, 130 Stat. 1366; Pub. L. 118–32, §2, Dec. 26, 2023, 137 Stat. 1109, established a reservation for Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon, prohibiting use of certain real property for gaming, specifying hunting, fishing, and trapping rights, and vesting civil and criminal jurisdiction in State of Oregon, directed treatment of certain lands as revested Oregon and California railroad grant lands, and provided economic development for the Tribes.

[Pub. L. 118–32, §3, Dec. 26, 2023, 137 Stat. 1109, provided that: "Nothing in this Act [enacting provisions set out as a note under section 713 of this title and amending Pub. L. 100–425 above], or an amendment made by this Act, shall be construed to enlarge, confirm, adjudicate, affect, or modify any treaty right of an Indian Tribe (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304))."]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements on Forms S-8, Forms S-3D or Forms S-3 of Cooper Industries, Inc. or
Cooper Industries, Ltd. and in each related Prospectus of our report dated March
4, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of
Cooper Industries, Ltd. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2003.


No. 2-33-14542       Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper
                     Industries, Inc. 1989 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

No. 333-02847        Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
                     Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan

No. 333-64400        Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
                     Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan

No. 333-24237        Form S-3D Registration Statement for Cooper Industries,
                     Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

No. 333-101451       Form S-3D Registration Statement for Cooper Industries,
                     Ltd. Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

No. 333-51439        Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
                     Director's Retainer Fee Stock Plan

No. 333-51441        Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper Industries, Inc.
                     Amended and Restated Management Annual Incentive Plan

No. 333-37580        Form S-8 Registration Statement for Cooper (UK) Employee
                     Share Purchase Plan

No. 333-75475        Form S-3 Registration Statement for a shelf registration to
                     issue up to $500 million of debt securities

No. 333-99581        Form S-3 Registration Statement for a shelf registration to
                     issue a guarantee of up to $500 million of debt securities


                                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 4, 2004
### PART XI—SPECIAL RULES RELATING TO CORPORATE PREFERENCE ITEMS

Sec.
291.
Special rules relating to corporate preference items.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–248, title II, §204(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 423, added part XI heading and analysis of sections consisting of item 291.
#### William McKay, Appellant, *v.*The City of Buffalo, Respondent.

(Argued September 30, 1878;

decided October 4, 1878.)

*John C. Strong*for appellant.

*Frank R. Perkins*for respondent.

Agree to affirm, with leave to defendant to amend on payment of costs. No opinion.

All concur, except Miller and Earl, JJ., absent.

Judgment accordingly.
### §474. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 474 was editorially reclassified as section 5120 of this title.
#### Ella Pearl Elliott, as Executrix, etc., Respondent, v. William W. Niles and Another, Copartners, etc., Appellants.

Motion for resettlement denied, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6902

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

SHAUN EUGENE REED, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Gina M. Groh, Chief 

District Judge. (3:05-cr-00003-GMG-JES-1) 

Submitted: October 25, 2016 Decided: November 4, 2016

Before KING, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Shaun Eugene Reed, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Shaun Eugene Reed appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 60(d) motion to vacate judgment. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. As the district court 

correctly determined, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do 

not provide a vehicle by which Reed may challenge his criminal 

judgment. See United States v. O’Keefe, 169 F.3d 281, 289 

(5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Mosavi, 138 F.3d 1365, 1366 

(11th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). Additionally, Reed did not 

satisfy the “four essential prerequisites” needed to obtain 

coram nobis relief. See Bereano v. United States, 706 F.3d 568, 

576 (4th Cir. 2013). We therefore affirm the district court’s 

order. United States v. Reed, No. 3:05-cr-00003-GMG-JES-1 (N.D.

W. Va. June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (723)
<INVENTORY>                                    112,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,360
<PP&E>                                         102,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,118)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 410,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,551
<BONDS>                                        196,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   410,590
<SALES>                                         73,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,935
<CGS>                                           66,581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,288)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (219)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,069)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,069)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.33)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,321.50

 2,321.31

 2,321.13

 2,320.93

 2,320.72

 2,320.48

 2,320.30

 2,320.13

 2,319.90

 2,319.61

 2,319.39

 2,319.16

 2,318.97

 2,318.79

 2,318.64

 2,318.43

 2,318.18

 2,317.91

 2,317.63

 2,317.36

 2,317.13

 2,316.94

 2,316.72

 2,316.49

 2,316.27

 2,316.00

 2,315.68

 2,315.42

 2,315.18

 2,314.92

 2,314.66

 1,731.2

 1,728.7

 1,726.3

 1,723.6

 1,720.9

 1,717.7

 1,715.4

 1,713.1

 1,710.1

 1,706.3

 1,703.4

 1,700.4

 1,697.9

 1,695.6

 1,693.6

 1,690.9

 1,687.7

 1,684.2

 1,680.5

 1,677.0

 1,674.1

 1,671.6

 1,668.8

 1,665.8

 1,663.0

 1,659.5

 1,655.4

 1,652.1

 1,649.0

 1,645.7

 1,642.3

STORAGE

-2.6

-2.5

-2.4

-2.6

-2.8

-3.2

-2.4

-2.2

-3.0

-3.8

-2.9

-3.0

-2.5

-2.3

-2.0

-2.7

-3.3

-3.5

-3.6

-3.5

-3.0

-2.5

-2.8

-3.0

-2.8

-3.5

-4.1

-3.3

-3.1

-3.3

-3.3

CHANGE

510

539

635

555

505

460

319

441

382

243

322

345

534

374

491

536

277

163

305

176

14

189

414

378

452

105

-162

-75

-31

198

312

INFLOW

 1,709

 1,684

 1,701

 1,768

 1,765

 1,919

 1,415

 1,437

 1,776

 2,060

 1,673

 1,758

 1,667

 1,444

 1,373

 1,780

 1,803

 1,798

 2,003

 1,855

 1,405

 1,317

 1,733

 1,766

 1,775

 1,752

 1,785

 1,481

 1,519

 1,777

 1,927

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 132

 120

 132

 116

 132

 131

 97

 131

 127

 96

 100

 104

 119

 111

 103

 134

 115

 134

 130

 84

 110

 110

 110

 106

 106

 106

 121

 124

 0

 98

 56

C.F.S.

 .34

 .31

 .34

 .30

 .34

 .34

 .25

 .34

 .33

 .25

 .26

 .27

 .31

 .29

 .27

 .35

 .30

 .35

 .34

 .22

 .29

 .29

 .29

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .32

 .33

 .00

 .26

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .10

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2010 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 3, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -91.5 9,906 52,625 0 0 3,395 8.87 .32

ACRE-FEET -91,500 19,649 104,382 0 0 6,734

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 104,382

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 104,382

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .32

JULY 1, 2010 .32

 1,733.8

(1) (1)
§ 2883.10 Who may hold a grant or TUP? To hold a grant or TUP under these regulations, you must be: ( a ) ( 1 ) A United States citizen, an association of such citizens, or a corporation, partnership, association, or similar business entity organized under the laws of the United States, or of any state therein; or
( 2 ) A state or local government; and
( b ) Financially and technically able to construct, operate, maintain, and terminate the proposed facilities.