alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Avantogen Oncology, Inc., on Form 10-QSB
      for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, William Ardrey,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
      (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                October 26, 2007By:
            /s/
                William ArdreyWilliam
                Ardrey
                Chief
                  Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### **CHAPTER 69—GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO STAMPS**

Sec.
6801.
Authority for establishment, alteration, and distribution.
6802.
Supply and distribution.
6803.
Accounting and safeguarding.
6804.
Attachment and cancellation.
6805.
Redemption of stamps.
6806.
Posting occupational tax stamps. 1

6807.
Stamping, marking, and branding seized goods.
6808.
Special provisions relating to stamps.

1  Section catchline amended by Pub. L. 90–618 without corresponding amendment of analysis.
### PART II—MUTUAL SAVINGS BANKS, ETC.

Sec.
591.
Deduction for dividends paid on deposits.
[592.
Repealed.]
593.
Reserves for losses on loans.
594.
Alternative tax for mutual savings banks conducting life insurance business.
[595, 596.
Repealed.]
597.
Treatment of transactions in which Federal financial assistance provided.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §1616(b)(16), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1857, struck out items 595 "Foreclosure on property securing loans" and 596 "Limitation on dividends received deduction".

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–73, title XIV, §1401(b)(1), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 549, repealed amendment made by Pub. L. 99–514, §904(b)(2), see 1986 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 101–73, title XIV, §1401(a)(3)(C), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 549, substituted "Treatment of transactions in which Federal financial assistance provided" for "FSLIC or FDIC financial assistance" in item 597.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–647, title IV, §4012(b)(2)(D)(ii), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3658, substituted "FSLIC or FDIC" for "FSLIC" in item 597.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title IX, §904(b)(2), (c)(2)(A), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2385, as amended by Pub. L. 100–647, title IV, §4012(a)(2), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3656, which, applicable to transfers after Dec. 31, 1989, in taxable years ending after that date, directed amendment of analysis by striking out item 597, was repealed by Pub. L. 101–73, title XIV, §1401(b)(1), (c)(4), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 549, 550, eff. Oct. 22, 1986, and applicable as if the amendments made by such section had not been enacted.

**1981**—Pub. L. 97–34, title II, §244(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 255, added item 597.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(b)(19), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1796, struck out item 592 "Deduction for repayment of certain loans".

**1969**—Pub. L. 91–172, title IV, §434(b)(2), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 625, added item 596.

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–834, §6(d), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 984, substituted "Reserves for losses on loans" for "Additions to reserve for bad debts" in item 593, and added item 595.
§ 3140.12 Notice of intent to convert. ( a ) Owners of oil and gas leases in Special Tar Sand Areas which were scheduled to expire prior to November 15, 1983, could have preserved the right to convert their leases to combined hydrocarbon leases by filing a Notice of Intent to Convert with the BLM Utah State Office.
( b ) A letter, submitted by the lessee, notifying the BLM of the lessee's intention to submit a plan of operations constituted a notice of intent to convert a lease. The Notice of Intent must have contained the lease number.
( c ) The Notice of Intent must have been filed prior to the expiration date of the lease. The notice would have preserved the lessee's conversion rights only until November 15, 1983.
#### Cinoti RUIZ-FIGUEROA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-70169.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 13, 2006.*

Feb. 21, 2006.

Luis Carlos Ayala, Esq., Law Offices of Luis Carlos Ayala, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Paul Fiorino, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*144MEMORANDUM **

Cinoti Ruiz-Figueroa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal on the ground that he failed to satisfy the continuous physical presence requirement under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

Ruiz-Figueroa contends that the Board violated his right to due process when it affirmed the immigration judge’s finding that his voluntary departure in 1999 constituted a break in his continuous physical presence because the immigration judge did not sufficiently develop the record. We lack jurisdiction to consider this issue because Ruiz-Figueroa did not raise it before the Board and thus failed to exhaust administrative remedies. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1).

Ruiz-Figueroa also contends that the immigration judge’s finding was not supported by substantial evidence because the record does not show that his departure was under threat of deportation or removal, as required by *Vasquez-Lopez v. Ashcroft,*343 F.3d 961, 972 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam). His pro se notice of appeal to the Board did exhaust administrative remedies as to this issue. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1).

Ruiz-Figueroa testified that in 1999 he left the United States for 15 days. He testified that when he came back, immigration authorities stopped him at the border, and he signed a “voluntary return.” This record shows that under *Vasquez-Lopez,*343 F.3d at 972, Ruiz-Figueroa’s departure in 1999 constituted a break in his continuous presence. *Cf. Tapia v. Gonzales,*430 F.3d at 1002-04 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that turn-around at border does not constitute break). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,343.72

 2,343.97

 2,344.17

 2,344.22

 2,344.23

 2,344.34

 2,344.34

 2,344.33

 2,344.48

 2,344.68

 2,344.99

 2,345.52

 2,346.16

 2,346.74

 2,347.26

 2,347.76

 2,348.18

 2,348.57

 2,348.95

 2,349.31

 2,349.76

 2,350.18

 2,350.62

 2,351.25

 2,351.84

 2,352.34

 2,352.79

 2,353.49

 2,354.55

 2,355.40

 2,040.6

 2,044.2

 2,047.2

 2,047.9

 2,048.1

 2,049.7

 2,049.7

 2,049.5

 2,051.8

 2,054.7

 2,059.3

 2,067.1

 2,076.6

 2,085.2

 2,092.9

 2,100.3

 2,106.6

 2,112.4

 2,118.1

 2,123.5

 2,130.3

 2,136.6

 2,143.2

 2,152.8

 2,161.7

 2,169.3

 2,176.1

 2,186.8

 2,202.9

 2,215.9

STORAGE

+4.4

+3.7

+2.9

+0.7

+0.1

+1.6

+0.0

-0.1

+2.2

+2.9

+4.6

+7.8

+9.5

+8.6

+7.7

+7.4

+6.3

+5.8

+5.7

+5.4

+6.8

+6.3

+6.6

+9.5

+8.9

+7.6

+6.8

+10.7

+16.2

+13.0

CHANGE

3,931

3,552

3,100

3,101

2,426

2,178

2,393

2,454

2,253

2,592

3,030

4,396

5,094

4,722

3,943

4,154

3,536

3,294

3,232

3,105

3,782

3,565

3,744

5,221

4,689

4,197

3,917

5,560

8,171

7,124

INFLOW

 1,645

 1,631

 1,600

 2,713

 2,303

 1,314

 2,371

 2,467

 1,066

 1,034

 708

 399

 312

 366

 14

 381

 358

 287

 300

 302

 335

 358

 347

 426

 153

 347

 433

 162

 14

 518

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 29

OUTLET

 69

 73

 17

 17

 48

 48

 22

 61

 74

 74

 22

 48

 9

 17

 31

 18

 18

 66

 66

 79

 40

 22

 53

 0

 36

 27

 40

 27

 0

 14

C.F.S.

 .16

 .17

 .04

 .04

 .11

 .11

 .05

 .14

 .17

 .17

 .05

 .11

 .02

 .04

 .07

 .04

 .04

 .15

 .15

 .18

 .09

 .05

 .12

 .00

 .08

 .06

 .09

 .06

 .00

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .03

 .05

 .45

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .22

 .36

 .99

 .63

 .11

 .08

 .18

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .55

 .47

 .00

 .60

 .19

 .21

 .06

 .64

 1.00

 .17

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2003 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +179.6 116,456 24,664 0 29 1,136 2.59 7.00

ACRE-FEET +179,600 230,990 48,921 0 58 2,253

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 48,921

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 58

 48,979

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 7.00

JULY 1, 2002 36.03

 2,036.2

(1) (1)
‘I

(All Programs)

CONTINGENT ON APPROPRIATION OR ALLOTMENT OF FUNDS

The expenditure or advance of any money or the performance of any

obligation of the United States under this contract shall be contingent upon

appropriation or allotment offunds. Absence of appropriation or allotment of funds

shall not relieve the Contractor from any obligations under this contract. No liability

shall accrue to the United States in case funds are not appropriated or allotted.

Approved 2/22/71; Revised 11/84 All contracts

M.12
#### Wilfred Zehr, Appellant, v. Greta A. Zehr, Respondent.

Present— Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VAALCO Energy, Inc. (the “**Company**”) onForm 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, W. Russell Scheirman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 7, 2007
### §2709. Interim authority to regulate gaming

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Secretary shall continue to exercise those authorities vested in the Secretary on the day before October 17, 1988, relating to supervision of Indian gaming until such time as the Commission is organized and prescribes regulations. The Secretary shall provide staff and support assistance to facilitate an orderly transition to regulation of Indian gaming by the Commission.

(Pub. L. 100–497, §10, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2472.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 100–497, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2467, known as the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2701 of this title and Tables.
§ 2522.1 General acts authorizing extensions of time. ( a ) There are five general Acts of Congress which authorize the allowance, under certain conditions, of an extension of time for the submission of final proof by a desert-land claimant. Said Acts are the following: June 27, 1906 (Sec. 5, 34 Stat. 520; 43 U.S.C. 448); March 28, 1908 (Sec. 3, 35 Stat. 52; 43 U.S.C. 333); April 30, 1912 (37 Stat. 106; 43 U.S.C. 334); March 4, 1915 (Sec. 5, 38 Stat. 1161; 43 U.S.C. 335); and February 25, 1925 (43 Stat. 982; 43 U.S.C. 336). The Act of June 27, 1906, is applicable only to entries embraced within the exterior limits of some withdrawal or irrigation project under the Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388).
( b ) In addition to the Acts cited in this section, extensions of time for making desert-land proofs were authorized by the Acts of June 16, 1933 (48 Stat. 274; 43 U.S.C. 256a), July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 504; 43 U.S.C. 256a), and June 16, 1937 (50 Stat. 303; 43 U.S.C. 256a). Such Acts affect only proofs becoming due on or before December 31, 1936. For that reason, the regulations which were issued thereunder have not been included in this chapter.
### §1778a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 106–568, title VI, §603, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2908, which set out definitions for this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3282.9 How is production allocated within a participating area?

Allocation of production to each committed lease or tract within a participating area is in the same proportion as that lease's or tract's surface acreage within the participating area.
#### § 3420.4-1 Timing of consultation.

Following the release of the final regional lease sale environmental impact statement, and prior to adopting a regional lease sale schedule, the Secretary shall engage in formal consultation as specified in §§ 3420.4-2 through 3420.4-5 of this title.

[44 FR 42615, July 19, 1979. Redesignated and amended at 47 FR 33139, July 30, 1982]
### §565e. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–261, §2, Dec. 21, 2022, 136 Stat. 2393

Section, Pub. L. 89–224, §6, Oct. 1, 1965, 79 Stat. 898, related to payment of costs of distribution.
§ 3271.12 What do I need to start preliminary site investigations that may disturb the surface? ( a ) You must: ( 1 ) Fully describe your proposed operations in a Sundry Notice; and
( 2 ) File a bond meeting the requirements of either § 3251.14 or § 3273.19. See subparts 3214 and 3215 for additional details on bonding procedures.
( b ) Do not begin the site investigation or surface disturbing activity until BLM approves your Sundry Notice and bond.
### §306a. Advances for support of old, disabled, or indigent allottees; lien against land

On and after May 9, 1938, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion and under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, to make advances to old, disabled, or indigent Indian allottees, for their support, to remain a charge and lien against their land until paid; such advances for the fiscal year 1939 to be made from the appropriations in this paragraph and those for fiscal years thereafter to be made from appropriations specifically available for such purposes.

(May 9, 1938, ch. 187, §1, 52 Stat. 302.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This paragraph, referred to in text, means the first undesignated paragraph contained at 52 Stat. 302, and the appropriations for advances for the fiscal year 1939, referred to in text, were contained in such part of the undesignated paragraph which was not classified to the Code.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-60835-CIV-SINGHAL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ex rel. LAUREN LAU,

Plaintiff,

v.

FILED UNDER SEAL

ELLWOOD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC;

AMERICORE HEALTH, LLC; et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

SEALED ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the United States' Notice To Intervene In 

Part For Purposes Of Settlement And To Decline In Part (DE [44]). The Court, having 

reviewed the Notice, the record, and being otherwise fully advised, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The complaint be unsealed and served upon the defendants by the relator 

within 90 days of this Order;

2. All other contents of the Court’s file in this action remain under seal and not be 

made public or served upon the defendants, except for this Order, the United 

States’ Notice of Election to Intervene in Part For Purposes of Settlement and 

to Decline in Part, the United States’ applications for extension of time (but not 

the memorandum of law in support of such applications), and the Court’s prior 

Orders, which the relator will serve upon the defendants only after service of 

the complaint; and that

Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2024 Page 1 of 2
3. The seal be lifted as to all other matters occurring in this action after the date 

of this Order. 

DONE AND ORDERED in chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 15th day of 

May, 2024.

cc: Counsel of Record

AUSA Rosaline Chan 

Case 0:20-cv-60835-AHS Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2024 Page 2 of 2
#### Langdon & Matule, Inc., Respondent, v. Eureka Iron Works, Inc., Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Duran Garcia *&*Cia, Third Party Defendant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
§ 3622.1 Program: General. ( a ) Persons may collect limited quantities of petrified wood for noncommercial purposes under terms and conditions consistent with the preservation of significant deposits as a public recreational resource.
( b ) The purchase of petrified wood for commercial purposes is provided for in § 3602.10 *et seq.* of this chapter.
[48 FR 27015, June 10, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 58909, Nov. 23, 2001]
#### § 3204.15 May I withdraw my application for a noncompetitive lease?

During the 30-day period after the competitive lease sale, BLM will only accept a withdrawal of the entire application. Following that 30-day period, you may withdraw your noncompetitive lease application in whole or in part at any time before BLM issues the lease. If a partial withdrawal causes your lease application to contain less than the minimum acreage required under § 3206.12, BLM will reject the application.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                   UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                               Date: March 2, 2004

                        Commission File Number 001-12510
                                               ---------

                                   ROYAL AHOLD
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

               Albert Heijnweg 1, 1507 EH Zaandam, The Netherlands
               ---------------------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                      Form 20-F0 X           Form 40-F
                                ---                    ---

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                             Yes              No  X
                                 ---             ---

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.
<PAGE>

     On March 2, 2004, Koninklijke Ahold N.V. ("Royal Ahold" or the "Company")
issued a press release announcing that Institutional Shareholder Services has
recommended that the Company's shareholders support proposed changes in the
Company's corporate governance policies. A copy of the press release is attached
hereto as Exhibit 99.1.
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                        KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V.

                                         /s/ H.R. Ryopponen
                                        ----------------------------------------
Date:  March 2, 2004                    By:     H.R. Ryopponen
                                        Title:  Executive Vice President and CFO
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibit has been filed as part of this Form 6-K:

Exhibit        Description
-------        -----------

99.1           Royal Ahold press release, dated March 2, 2004, announcing that
               Institutional Shareholder Services has recommended that the
               Company's shareholders support proposed changes in the Company's
               corporate governance policies
### **CHAPTER 73—BONDS**

Sec.
7101.
Form of bonds.
7102.
Single bond in lieu of multiple bonds.
7103.
Cross references—Other provisions for bonds.
#### In the Matter of the Guardian Mutual Life Insurance Company. In the Matter of the Widows and Orphans’ Benefit Life Insurance Company. In the Matter of the New York State Life Insurance Company. In the Matter of the Reserve Mutual Life Insurance Company.

(Argued September 24, 1878;

decided October 1, 1878.)

Reported below, 13 Hun, 115.

*R. W Peckham*for appellants.

*A. Schoonmaker, Jr.,*for respondents.

Agree to affirm without opinion.

All concur, except Miller and Earl, J J., absent; Hand, J., not voting.

Orders affirmed.
#### § 3862.8 Patents for mining claims.