50156 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

Engine model Manufacturer Aircraft model 

Nauchang .......................................................................................................................... N5 

IO–720–D1C ................... Piper .................................................................................................................................. PA–36–375 Brave 

Unsafe Condition 

(d) This AD results from Lycoming Engines 

discovering that the March 1, 1997 start date 

of affected engine models in Mandatory 

Service Bulletin (MSB) No. 569A, is 

incorrect. Lycoming Engines issued 

Supplement 1 to MSB No. 569A, dated May 

27, 2009, which corrected the date of affected 

engine models, to January 1, 1997. We are 

issuing this AD to prevent failure of the 

crankshaft, which will result in total engine 

power loss, in-flight engine failure, and 

possible loss of the aircraft. 

Compliance 

(e) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Engines for Which No Action Is Required 

(f) If your engine meets any of the 

following conditions, and you have not had 

the crankshaft replaced since meeting the 

condition, no further action is required: 

(1) Engines that are in compliance with 

Lycoming MSB No. 552 (AD 2002–19–03) or 

MSB No. 553 (AD 2002–19–03 Table 3 or 

Table 5); or 

(2) Engines that are in compliance with 

Lycoming MSB No. 566 AD (2005–19–11); or 

(3) Engines that are in compliance with 

Lycoming Supplement No. 1 to MSB No. 566 

(AD 2006–06–16); or 

(4) Engines that are in compliance with the 

original issue of Lycoming MSB No. 569, 

MSB No. 569A, and Supplement 1 to MSB 

No. 569A. 

(5) For engines identified in paragraphs (f), 

(g), (h), or (i) of this AD, owners or operators 

may make an entry in the AD status log 

required by 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(v) that this 

AD required no action for compliance. 

(g) If Lycoming Engines manufactured new, 

rebuilt, overhauled, or repaired your engine, 

or replaced the crankshaft in your engine 

before January 1, 1997, and you have not had 

the crankshaft replaced, no further action is 

required. 

(h) If Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, or Table 

4 of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated April 

11, 2006, lists your engine serial number 

(S/N), and Table 5 of MSB No. 569A, dated 

April 11, 2006, does not list your crankshaft 

S/N, no further action is required. 

(i) For engine model TIO–540–U2A, S/N 

L–4641–61A, no action is required. 

Engines for Which Action Is Required 

(j) If Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, or Table 4 

of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 

2006, lists your engine S/N, and Table 5 of 

MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, lists 

your crankshaft S/N, replace the affected 

crankshaft with a crankshaft that is not listed 

in Table 5 of MSB No. 569A at the earliest 

of the following: 

(1) The time of the next engine overhaul as 

specified in Lycoming Engines Service 

Instruction No. 1009AS, dated May 25, 2006; 

or 

(2) The next separation of the crankcase, or 

(3) No later than 12 years from the time the 

crankshaft first entered service or was last 

overhauled, whichever is later. 

(k) If Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, or Table 

4 of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated April 

11, 2006, does not list your engine S/N, and 

Table 5 of MSB No. 569A does list your 

crankshaft S/N (an affected crankshaft was 

installed as a replacement), replace the 

affected crankshaft with a crankshaft that is 

not listed in Table 5 of MSB No. 569A at the 

earliest of the following: 

(1) The time of the next engine overhaul as 

specified in Lycoming Engines Service 

Instruction No. 1009AS, dated May 25, 2006; 

or 

(2) The next separation of the crankcase, or 

(3) No later than 12 years from the time the 

crankshaft first entered service or was last 

overhauled, whichever is later. 

Prohibition Against Installing Certain 

Crankshafts 

(l) After the effective date of this AD, do 

not install any crankshaft that has a S/N 

listed in Table 5 of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, 

dated April 11, 2006, into any engine. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC) 

(m) The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

AMOCs approved for AD 2006–20–09 are 

approved as AMOCs for this AD. 

Related Information 

(n) For more information about this AD, 

contact Norm Perenson, Aerospace Engineer, 

New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 

Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; 

phone: 516–228–7337; fax: 516–794–5531; email: norman.perenson@faa.gov. 

(o) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Lycoming, 652 Oliver Street, 

Williamsport, PA 17701; telephone (570) 

323–6181; fax (570) 327–7101, or on the 

Internet at http:// 

www.Lycoming.Textron.com. You may 

review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller 

Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, 

Burlington, MA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

781–238–7125. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on 

August 5, 2011. 

Peter A. White, 

Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20519 Filed 8–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–0455; Airspace 

Docket No. 11–AEA–4] 

Proposed Establishment of Class D 

and E Airspace; Frederick, MD 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

establish Class D and E airspace at 

Frederick, MD, to accommodate new 

Area Navigation (RNAV) Global 

Positioning System (GPS) Standard 

Instrument Approach Procedures 

(SIAPs) at Frederick Municipal Airport. 

This action would enhance the safety 

and management of Instrument Flight 

Rules (IFR) operations for SIAPs at the 

airport. 

DATES: 0901 UTC. Comments must be 

received on or before September 26, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule 

to: U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590–0001; Telephone: 1–800– 

647–5527; Fax: 202–493–2251. You 

must identify the Docket Number FAA– 

2011–0455; Airspace Docket No. 11– 

AEA–04, at the beginning of your 

comments. You may also submit and 

review received comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the rule, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal Holidays. 

An informal docket may also be 

examined during normal business hours 

at the office of the Eastern Service 

Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Room 350, 1701 

Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 

30337. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard Horrocks, Airspace Specialist, 

Operations Support Group, Eastern 

Service Center, Air Traffic Organization, 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules 50157 

Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 

Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; 

telephone (404) 305–5588. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested persons are invited to 

comment on this rule by submitting 

such written data, views, or arguments, 

as they may desire. Comments that 

provide the factual basis supporting the 

views and suggestions presented are 

particularly helpful in developing 

reasoned regulatory decisions on the 

proposal. Comments are specifically 

invited on the overall regulatory, 

aeronautical, economic, environmental, 

and energy-related aspects of the 

proposal. Communications should 

identify both docket numbers and be 

submitted in triplicate to the address 

listed above. Those wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this notice must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2011–0455; Airspace 

Docket No. 11–AEA–4.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. All communications 

received before the specified closing 

date for comments will be considered 

before taking action on the proposed 

rule. The proposal contained in this 

notice may be changed in light of the 

comments received. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded from and 

comments submitted through http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Recently 

published rulemaking documents can 

also be accessed through the FAA’s Web 

page at http://www.faa.gov/ 

airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/ 

publications/airspace_amendments/. 

Additionally, any person may obtain a 

copy of this notice by submitting a 

request to the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Office of Air 

Traffic Airspace Management, ATA– 

400, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591, or by calling 

(202) 267–8783. Communications must 

identify both docket numbers for this 

notice. Persons interested in being 

placed on a mailing list for future 

NPRMs should contact the FAA’s Office 

of Rulemaking, (202) 267–9677, to 

request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 

11–2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

Distribution System, which describes 

the application procedure. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is considering an 

amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish 

Class D airspace extending upward from 

the surface to 2,800 feet MSL within a 

5-mile radius of Frederick Municipal 

Airport. Class E surface area airspace, 

within a 5-mile radius of the airport and 

Class E airspace designated as an 

extension to Class D surface area. 

Controlled airspace is necessary for the 

new RNAV GPS standard instrument 

approach procedures developed for the 

airport and for continued safety and 

management of IFR operations at 

Frederick Municipal Airport. 

Designations for Class D and E 

airspace areas are published in 

Paragraphs 5000, 6002 and 6004 

respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9U, 

dated August 18, 2010, and effective 

September 15, 2010, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class D and E airspace 

designations listed in this document 

would be published subsequently in the 

Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this 

proposed rule, when promulgated, 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the criteria of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This proposed rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart 

I, section 40103. Under that section, the 

FAA is charged with prescribing 

regulations to assign the use of airspace 

necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft 

and the efficient use of airspace. This 

proposed regulation is within the scope 

of that authority as it would establish 

Class D and E airspace at Frederick 

Municipal Airport, Frederick, MD. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

1. The authority citation for part 71 

will continue to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9U, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 18, 2010, and 

effective September 15, 2010, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace 

* * * * * 

AEA MD D Frederick, MD [NEW] 

Frederick Municipal Airport, MD 

(Lat. 39°25′03′′ N., long. 77°22′28′′ W.) 

That airspace extending from the surface 

up to and including 2,800 feet MSL within 

a 5-mile radius of Frederick Municipal 

Airport. This Class D airspace area is 

effective during specific dates and times 

established in advance by a Notice to 

Airmen. The effective date and time will 

thereafter be continuously published in the 

Airport/Facility Directory. 

Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated 

as surface areas 

* * * * * 

AEA MD E2 Frederick, MD [NEW] 

Frederick Municipal Airport, MD 

(Lat. 39°25′03′′ N., long. 77°22′28′′ W.) 

That airspace extending from the surface 

up to and including 2,800 feet MSL within 

a 5-mile radius of the Frederick Municipal 

Airport. This Class E airspace area is effective 

during specific dates and times established in 

advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective 

date and time will thereafter be continuously 

published in the Airport/Facility Directory. 

Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace designated 

as an extension to a Class D surface area. 

* * * * * 

AEA MD E4 Frederick, MD [NEW] 

Frederick Municipal Airport, MD 

(Lat. 39°25′03′′ N., long. 77°22′28′′ W.) 

That airspace extending from the surface 

within 3.2 miles either side of the 036° 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
50158 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

bearing from the airport extending from the 

5 mile radius to 7.6 miles northeast of the 

airport. This Class E airspace area is effective 

during specific dates and times established in 

advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective 

date and time will thereafter be continuously 

published in the Airport/Facility Directory. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 

5, 2011. 

Mark D. Ward, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern 

Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20504 Filed 8–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Economic Analysis 

15 CFR Part 801 

[Docket No. 110112021–1439–02] 

RIN 0691–AA76 

International Services Surveys: 

Amendments to the BE–120, 

Benchmark Survey of Transactions in 

Selected Services and Intangible 

Assets With Foreign Persons 

AGENCY: Bureau of Economic Analysis, 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would 

amend the regulations of the Bureau of 

Economic Analysis, Department of 

Commerce (BEA) to set forth the 

reporting requirements for the BE–120, 

Benchmark Survey of Transactions in 

Selected Services and Intellectual 

Property with Foreign Persons. The 

proposed BE–120 would include both 

definition changes and the addition of 

three schedules to better collect data in 

accordance with new international 

standards. In addition, this proposed 

rule would change the BE–120 survey 

title from ‘‘Benchmark Survey of 

Transactions in Selected Services and 

Intangible Assets with Foreign Persons’’ 

to ‘‘Benchmark Survey of Transactions 

in Selected Services and Intellectual 

Property with Foreign Persons’’ because 

the term ‘‘intellectual property’’ is better 

understood by U.S. respondents. 

The proposed BE–120 survey is 

intended to cover transactions in 

selected services and intellectual 

property with foreign persons in 

benchmark years. In non-benchmark 

years, the universe estimates for these 

transactions would be derived from 

sample data reported on BEA’s followon survey, which is the Quarterly 

Survey of Transactions in Selected 

Services and Intangible Assets with 

Foreign Persons (BE–125). 

The data will be used by BEA to 

estimate the trade in services 

component of the U.S. International 

Transactions Accounts and other 

economic accounts compiled by BEA. 

The data are also needed by the U.S. 

government to monitor U.S. exports and 

imports of selected services and 

intellectual property; analyze their 

impact on the U.S. and foreign 

economies; support U.S. international 

trade policy for selected services and 

intellectual property; and assess and 

promote U.S. competitiveness in 

international trade in services. In 

addition, the data will improve the 

ability of U.S. businesses to identify and 

evaluate market opportunities. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule 

will receive consideration if submitted 

in writing on or before 5 p.m. October 

11, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

For agency, select ‘‘Commerce 

Department—all.’’ 

• E-mail: 

Christopher.Emond@bea.gov. 

• Fax: Chris Emond, Chief, Special 

Surveys Branch, (202) 606–5318. 

• Mail: Chris Emond, Chief, Special 

Surveys Branch, Balance of Payments 

Division, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Bureau of Economic Analysis, BE–50, 

Washington, DC 20230. 

• Hand Delivery: Chris Emond, Chief, 

Special Surveys Branch, Balance of 

Payments Division, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, Bureau of Economic 

Analysis, BE–50, Shipping and 

Receiving Section, M100, 1441 L Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

Please include in your comment a 

reference to RIN 0691–AA76 in the 

subject line. 

Written comments regarding the 

burden-hour estimates or other aspects 

of the collection-of-information 

requirements contained in the proposed 

rule should be sent both to BEA, 

through any of the methods listed 

above, and to the Office of Management 

and Budget, O.I.R.A., Paperwork 

Reduction Project, Attention PRA Desk 

Officer for BEA, via e-mail at 

pbugg@omb.eop.gov, or by FAX at 202– 

395–7245. 

Public Inspection: All comments 

received are a part of the public record 

and will generally be posted to http:// 

www.regulations.gov without change. 

All personal identifying information (for 

example, name, address, etc.) 

voluntarily submitted by the 

commentator may be publicly 

accessible. Do not submit confidential 

business information or other sensitive 

or protected information. BEA will 

accept anonymous comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chris Emond, Chief, Special Surveys 

Branch, Balance of Payments Division 

(BE–50), Bureau of Economic Analysis, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Washington, DC 20230; e-mail 

Christopher.Emond@bea.gov; or phone 

(202) 606–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposed rule would amend 15 CFR 

801.10 to update certain reporting 

requirements for the BE–120, 

Benchmark Survey of Transactions in 

Selected Services and Intangible Assets 

with Foreign Persons. The proposed 

BE–120 would include both definition 

changes and the addition of three 

schedules to better collect data in 

accordance with new international 

standards. In addition, this proposed 

rule would change the title of the BE– 

120 survey and make other 

nonsubstantive format changes to the 

regulations. 

The Department of Commerce, as part 

of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to comment on 

proposed and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

Description of Changes 

The BE–120 survey as proposed in 

this rule would be conducted by BEA 

every five years beginning with 

transactions occurring in fiscal year 

2011, under the authority provided by 

the International Investment and Trade 

in Services Survey Act (Pub. L. 94–472, 

90 Stat. 2059, 22 U.S.C. 3101–3108), 

hereinafter, ‘‘the Act,’’ and would be 

mandatory for those U.S. persons that 

engage in the covered transactions in 

amounts that exceed the exemption 

level. The proposed BE–120 survey is 

intended to cover sales to foreign 

persons of any of the 36 types of 

services or intellectual property listed in 

proposed paragraph 801.10(c) in 

benchmark years. In non-benchmark 

years, the universe estimates for these 

transactions would be derived from 

sample data reported on BEA’s followon survey, which is the Quarterly 

Survey of Transactions in Selected 

Services and Intangible Assets with 

Foreign Persons (BE–125). If this 

proposed rule is implemented, BEA 

would send the survey to potential 

respondents in March of 2012; 

responses would be due by June 30, 

2012. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1