alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.7





AMENDMENT

NO. 5 TO


2018
STOCK OPTION AND GRANT

PLAN OF


CENTURY
THERAPEUTICS, INC.


WHEREAS, up to 19,498,781
shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Century Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
are currently reserved under the Century Therapeutics, Inc. 2018 Stock Option and Grant Plan (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, the Board
of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), acting by unanimous written consent dated as of February 25, 2021,
approved and authorized this Amendment No. 5 to the Plan, pursuant to which the number of shares reserved under the Plan shall
be increased as set forth herein.


NOW THEREFORE, Section
3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:


“Stock Issuable.
The maximum number of Shares reserved and available for issuance under the Plan shall be 23,498,781 Shares, subject to adjustment
as provided in Section 3(b). For purposes of this limitation, the Shares underlying any Awards that are forfeited, canceled, reacquired
by the Company prior to vesting, satisfied without the issuance of Stock or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) and Shares
that are withheld upon exercise of an Option or settlement of an Award to cover the exercise price or tax withholding shall be
added back to the Shares available for issuance under the Plan. Subject to such overall limitations, Shares may be issued up to
such maximum number pursuant to any type or types of Award, and no more than 23,498,781 Shares may be issued pursuant to Incentive
Stock Options. The Shares available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized but unissued Shares or Shares reacquired by the
Company. Beginning on the date that the Company becomes subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, Options with respect to no more
than 23,498,781 Shares shall be granted to any one individual in any calendar year period.”


Except as expressly
set forth above, all of the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect and all references to the Plan
shall hereinafter be deemed to be references to the Plan as amended by this Amendment.
#### Jennie L. Ettinger, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Emanuel Ettinger, Deceased, Respondent, v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Association of America, Appellant.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4778 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4778

 To require limitations on research on potential pandemic pathogens of 
                                concern.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2022

 Mr. Marshall introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require limitations on research on potential pandemic pathogens of 
                                concern.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing America's Federally-funded 
Extramural Risky Research Act'' or the ``SAFE Risky Research Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON COUNTRIES OF CONCERN CONDUCTING CERTAIN 
              RESEARCH.

    Beginning not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall prohibit federally funded research 
conducted in a foreign institution involving pathogens of pandemic 
potential or biological agents or toxins listed pursuant to section 
351A(a)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)) 
located in a country of concern, in the estimation of the Director of 
National Intelligence or the head of another relevant Federal 
department or agency, as appropriate, in consultation with the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 3410.0-2 Objective.

The objective of this subpart is to allow private parties singularly or jointly to explore coal deposits to obtain geological, environmental, and other pertinent data concerning the coal deposits.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21871]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Oakwood 
Homes LLC and Niebur Golf, Inc., was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the District of Colorado on September 17, 2004.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Oakwood Homes LLC and Niebur Golf, Inc., pursuant 
to 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), 1319(b) and (d), and 33 U.S.C. 1344(s)(3), to 
obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the 
Defendants for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants 
without a permit into waters of the United States. The proposed Consent 
Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the Defendants to 
restore the impacted areas, to perform mitigation, and to pay a civil 
penalty.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Stephen D. 
Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, 1225 17th Street, Suite 700, 
Denver, Colorado 80202 and refer to United States v. Oakwood Homes, et 
al., Civil Action No. 04-D-1918 (MJW).
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Alfred A. 
Arrraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Room A 105, Denver, 
Colorado 80294. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed 
at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html.
John W. Suthers,
United States Attorney.

Stephen D. Taylor,
Assistant U.S. Attorney.
[FR Doc. 04-21871 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
#### The People *ex rel.*Linda K. Briel, Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*James Cameron Hogan, Defendant-Appellee.

(No. 73-53;

Third District

June 26, 1974.

Joseph Delaney, of Joliet, for appellant.

James Hogan, *pro se.*

*218Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SCOTT

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from the circuit court of Will County. The original action in the trial court was an action brought pursuant to tire provisions of the Illinois Paternity Act (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 106%, secs. 1 through 66.) No purpose would be served in setting forth a recital of the facts adduced and the procedure followed in the trial court since we are not inclined to dispose of this appeal on its merits.

The appellant has fully perfected her appeal and complied with all the requirements of the statute as well as the rules of this court. The appellee, though given repeated opportunities to do so has filed no brief or made any appearance of any nature before this court. On this state of the record we are justified in reversing and remanding the cause without further discussion and are of the opinion that we are constrained to do so. See 2 I.L.P. *Appeal and Error sec.*560; *C.I.T. Corporation v. Blackwell,*281 Ill.App. 504; *Ohnstein v. Levy,*349 Ill.App. 161, 109 N.E. 2d 923; *Basinski v. Basinski,*20 Ill.App.2d 336, 156 N.E.2d 225.

Accordingly the orders of the trial court vacating certain of its findings and interim orders (on December 16, 1971, and February 24, 1974, respectively) are summarily reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings regarding a determination as to an award of support for the minor child.

Reversed and remanded.

DIXON and STOUDER, JJ., concur.
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  S TATE OFC ALIFORNIA , ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. S AFEWAY , I NC ., a Safeway No. 08-55671 Company doing business as Vons; D.C. No. A LBERTSON’S , I NC .; R ALPHS 

#  2:04-cv-00687-AG- G ROCERYC OMPANY , a division of SS the Kroger Company; F OOD4 L ESS F OOD C OMPANY , a division of the Kroger Company; V ONS C OMPANIES I NC ., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Safeway, Inc.,

Defendants-Appellees, 

# 

 S TATE OFC ALIFORNIA , ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 08-55708 S AFEWAY , I NC ., a Safeway Company doing business as Vons; D.C. No. A LBERTSONS , I NC .; R ALPHS G ROCERY 2:04-cv-00687-AG

#  C OMPANY , a division of the Kroger SS Company; F OOD 4 L ESS F OOD ORDER C OMPANY , a division of the Kroger Company; V ONS C OMPANIES I NC ., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Safeway, Inc.,

Defendants-Appellees. 

# 

2655Filed February 11, 2011

ORDER
KOZINSKI , Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.Judges Bybee and Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. 2656 S TATE OFC ALIFORNIAv. S AFEWAY , I NC

.
#### § 3741.3 Additional evidence required with application for patent.

All questions between mining claimants asserting conflicting rights of possession under mining claims, must be adjudicated in the courts. Any applicant for mineral patent, who claims benefits under sections 1 or 3 of this Act, or the Act of August 12, 1953, supra, in addition to matters required in Group 3800 of this chapter, must file with his Application for Patent a certified copy of each instrument required to have been recorded as to his mining claim in order to entitle it to such benefits unless an Abstract of Title or Certificate of Title filed with the Application for Patent shall set forth said instruments in full. If a mining claim was located on or after the date of this Act a statement must be filed showing that on the date of location the lands affected were not covered by a uranium lease or an application for a uranium lease. The applicant must also file a copy of the notice required to be posted on the claim and state in his application that such notice was duly posted in accordance with the requirements of the Act.
### §564e. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §6, 68 Stat. 719; Pub. L. 85–132, §1(c), Aug. 14, 1957, 71 Stat. 347; Pub. L. 85–731, §10, Aug. 23, 1958, 72 Stat. 819, which related to sale of tribal property, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
----

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)

 

 

In connection with the Annual Reportof First National Power Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), onForm 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter Wanner, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company. 

 

 

 

***/s/ Peter WAnner               ***

Peter Wanner

Dated: March 30, 2005

 

 

 

----
§ 3505.65 What information must I include in my extension request? Your request must: ( a ) Show that you have met the conditions for extension in § 3505.62;
( b ) Describe your previous diligent prospecting activities on the permit; and
( c ) Show how much additional time you need to complete prospecting work.
#### § 3430.6-1 Lease terms.

Each preference right lease shall be subject to the terms provided for Federal coal leases established in part 3470 of this title.

[47 FR 33144, July 30, 1982]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1097** 

In R e: JUDY KAY MISKELL , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. (1:15

- cv - 00019

- CCB; 1:12

- cv - 00742

- CCB)

Submitted : March 18, 2015 Decided: April 10, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
. Judy Kay Miskell, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Judy Kay Miskell petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order granting her a jury trial. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; Un ited States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass ’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)
. Mandamus relief is available to remedy the improper denial of a jury trial. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). However, because Miskell’s district court cases are both closed, she is not entitled to a jury trial. Thus, t he relief sought by Miskell is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and Miskell’s motion concerning judicial review . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1546-DR]


North Carolina; Amendment No. 3 To Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-1546-DR), dated September 10, 
2004, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 24, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of North Carolina is hereby amended to include the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of September 10, 2004:

    The counties of Ashe and Anson for Public Assistance.
    The counties of Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Haywood, 
Madison, McDowell, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Transylvania, 
Watauga, and Yancey for Public Assistance [Categories C through G] 
(already designated for debris removal and emergency protective 
measures [Categories A and B] at 100 percent Federal funding of the 
total eligible costs for the first 72 hours.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-22075 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
§ 3504.50 Do I have to file a bond to receive a permit or lease? Yes, unless paragraph (b) of this section applies. ( a ) BLM will set permit and lease bond amounts for each lease or permit. We will consider the cost of complying with all permit and lease terms, including royalty and reclamation requirements, when setting bond amounts. The minimum bond amount for prospecting permits is $1000. The minimum bond amount for leases is $5000.
( b ) BLM may enter into agreements with states to provide for your state reclamation bond to satisfy our reclamation bonding requirements. We may need additional information from you to determine whether your state bond will cover all of our reclamation requirements. If you have filed a current bond with a state where we have an agreement, and we determine that your state bond will satisfy all BLM reclamation bonding requirements, you will only need to file evidence of that state bond with BLM. We will require an additional bond from you if we determine your state bond does not cover all of our bonding requirements.
# Jurnalul Oficial C 219I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 219I |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 633 iulie 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 219I

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 633 iulie 2020

---

| Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informări |
| | INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE |
| | Comisia Europeană |
| 2020/C 219 I/01 | Comunicare privind amânarea intrării în vigoare a dispozițiilor MiFIR referitoare la accesul liber în ceea ce privește instrumentele financiare derivate tranzacționate la bursă | 1 |

Cuprins

Pagina

IV   Informări

INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE

Comisia Europeană

2020/C 219 I/01

Comunicare privind amânarea intrării în vigoare a dispozițiilor MiFIR referitoare la accesul liber în ceea ce privește instrumentele financiare derivate tranzacționate la bursă

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

IV Informări

INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE

Comisia Europeană

| 3.7.2020 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CI 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2020

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CI 219/1

---

Comunicare privind amânarea intrării în vigoare a dispozițiilor MiFIR referitoare la accesul liber în ceea ce privește instrumentele financiare derivate tranzacționate la bursă

(2020/C 219 I/01)

Articolul 54 alineatul (2) din Regulamentul (UE) nr. 600/2014 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului (1)(„MiFIR”) prevede o perioadă de tranziție în cursul căreia articolul 35 sau 36 din MiFIR nu se aplică în cazul contrapărților centrale („CPC”) sau al locurilor de tranzacționare care au solicitat să beneficieze de acest regim de tranziție în ceea ce privește instrumentele financiare derivate tranzacționate la bursă.

Perioada de tranziție expiră la 3 iulie 2020. Contextul actual al pieței, caracterizat de un grad ridicat de incertitudine și de volatilitate determinat de pandemia de COVID-19, sporește riscurile operaționale pentru CPC și pentru locurile de tranzacționare. Din cauza riscurilor mai mari, este necesar să se acorde mai multă atenție continuității activității, iar evaluarea cererilor de acces ar putea avea, în contextul actual, repercusiuni negative asupra bunei funcționări a piețelor în ceea ce privește tranzacționarea și compensarea instrumentelor financiare derivate tranzacționate la bursă. Prin urmare, colegiuitorii au convenit să prelungească perioada de tranziție până la 3 iulie 2021.

În consecință, participanții la piață sunt informați că s-a convenit, de către colegiuitori, prelungirea, începând cu 4 iulie 2020, a regimului de tranziție prevăzut la articolul 54 alineatul (2) referitor la articolul 35 sau articolul 36 din MiFIR. Prelungirea se aplică CPC sau locurilor de tranzacționare care au solicitat autorităților lor competente să beneficieze de regimul de tranziție în ceea ce privește instrumentele financiare derivate tranzacționate la bursă.

---

(1)  JO L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 84.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 223

 224

 232

 227

 246

 249

 252

 237

 232

 237

 225

 244

 244

 261

 277

 271

 270

 291

 297

 306

 293

 275

 296

 297

 299

 315

 304

 324

 304

 301

 300

 169

 171

 172

 177

 187

 196

 199

 190

 182

 183

 178

 181

 186

 192

 195

 203

 208

 212

 223

 225

 230

 227

 226

 229

 237

 233

 234

 232

 234

 224

 226

 189

 193

 198

 199

 205

 214

 213

 210

 203

 201

 198

 201

 212

 216

 222

 227

 228

 239

 246

 248

 251

 247

 252

 253

 259

 261

 258

 260

 257

 248

 246

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 12, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER