alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of MM2 Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Meller, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                      /s/ Mark Meller
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                      Mark Meller
                                      President
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      October 14, 2008
### §640a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–189, §2, Dec. 15, 1971, 85 Stat. 646; Pub. L. 110–315, title IX, §946(a), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3468, which related to purpose of former sections 640a to 640c–3 of this title, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2008 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–315, title IX, §945, Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3468, provided that subpart 2 (§§945, 946) of part E of title IX of Pub. L. 110–315 [see Tables for classification] could be cited as the "Navajo Nation Higher Education Act of 2008".

#### Short Title of 1978 Amendment

Pub. L. 95–471, title II, §201, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1329, provided that title II of Pub. L. 95–471 [see Tables for classification] could be cited as the "Navajo Community College Assistance Act of 1978".

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 92–189, §1, Dec. 15, 1971, 85 Stat. 646, provided that Pub. L. 92–189, enacting sections 640a to 640c–3 of this title, could be cited as the "Navajo Community College Act".
### §646. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–264, §6, May 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 261, which deemed securities issued by the Council to be exempted securities and provided that they would be exempt from registration requirements, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 336

 322

 323

 341

 323

 334

 334

 330

 276

 275

 267

 273

 274

 278

 281

 276

 288

 306

 301

 296

 307

 307

 298

 299

 312

 314

 316

 308

 333

 351

 370

 307

 303

 306

 321

 309

 315

 317

 277

 263

 246

 245

 264

 266

 271

 265

 259

 267

 287

 277

 276

 274

 293

 285

 288

 290

 302

 289

 293

 303

 329

 346

 323

 313

 313

 330

 315

 324

 326

 302

 270

 258

 255

 268

 270

 275

 272

 267

 276

 297

 288

 284

 290

 300

 291

 293

 300

 309

 304

 300

 316

 336

 356

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 10,700

 10,644

 10,600

 10,587

 10,566

 10,553

 10,499

 10,393

 10,244

 10,087

 9,922

 9,825

 9,745

 9,661

 9,574

 9,478

 9,402

 9,343

 9,268

 9,198

 9,138

 9,103

 9,076

 9,057

 9,031

 8,996

 8,956

 8,905

 8,872

 8,865

 8,898

 357

 355

 353

 353

 352

 352

 350

 346

 341

 336

 331

 328

 325

 322

 319

 316

 313

 311

 309

 307

 305

 303

 303

 302

 301

 300

 299

 297

 296

 296

 297

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
TITLE 34 OF PUBLIC LAW 102-575

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT IMPROVEMENT ACT

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT – CALIFORNIA

REVISED INTERIM GUIDELINES:

RESTORATION FUND PAYMENTS AND CHARGES

OCTOBER 1993

United States Department of the Interior

Bureau of Reclamation

Mid-Pacific Region
#### Elma Dickerson, an Infant, by Ruth Due, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Fern C. Swanson (Lindbloom), Appellant.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tomas BETANCOURT-OCHOA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41006.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Tomas Betancourt-Ochoa (Betancourt) pleaded guilty to unlawful presence in the United States following deportation after having been convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). The district court sentenced him *281to 37 months of imprisonment, to be followed by three years of supervised release.

Betancourt challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. We decline ruling on the applicability of the waiver provisions in Betancourt’s plea agreement because his constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Betancourt contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert, denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Betancourt properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 3581.4 Leases.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 404]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ404.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 2259]]

Public Law 108-404
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  1001 Williams Street in Ignacio, Colorado, as the ``Leonard C. Burch 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 30, 2004 -  [H.R. 5051]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1001 
Williams Street in Ignacio, Colorado, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Leonard C. Burch Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Leonard C. Burch Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved October 30, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5051:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Oct. 6, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 10, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 3501.20 If BLM approves my application for a use authorization under this part, when does it become effective?

Your lease, permit, or other use authorization is effective the first day of the month after BLM signs it, unless you request in writing and BLM agrees to make it effective the first day of the month in which it is approved. This applies to all leases, licenses, permits, transfers and assignments in this part, unless a specific regulation provides otherwise.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHARLES A. BROWN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-815

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed August 22, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Manatee County; Charles Sniffen, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 37 So. 3d 921 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); 

Steward v. State, 931 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Coke v. State, 955 So. 2d 1216 

(Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

BLACK, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

In accordance with notices received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective September 19 and 22, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning September 14, 2004 and continuing through September 19, 2004. The declaration is also amended to include the municipalities of Caguas and Vieques as disaster areas due to damages caused by Tropical Storm Jeanne. All other municipalities contiguous to the above named primary municipalities have previously been declared. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is November 22, 2004 and for economic injury the deadline is June 21, 2005.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008)

Dated: September 27, 2004. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-22289 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §735. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–89, title II, §205, Aug. 18, 1987, 101 Stat. 671, which related to adoption of a new constitution and bylaws, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 23.12 Appeals. ( a ) A person adversely affected by a decision or order of a district manager or of a mining supervisor made pursuant to the provisions of this part shall have a right of appeal to the Board of Land Appeals, Office of Hearings and Appeals, whenever the decision appealed from was rendered by a district manager, or to the Director of the Geological Survey if the decision or order appealed from was rendered by a mining supervisor, and the further right to appeal to the Board of Land Appeals from an adverse decision of the Director of the Geological Survey unless such decision was approved by the Secretary prior to promulgation.
( b ) Appeals to the Board of Land Appeals shall be made pursuant to part 4 of this title. Appeals to the Director of the Geological Survey shall be made in the manner provided in 30 CFR part 290.
( c ) In any case involving a permit, lease, or contract for lands under the jurisdiction of an agency other than the Department of the Interior, or a bureau of the Department of the Interior other than the Bureau of Land Management, the officer rendering a decision or order shall designate the authorized officer of such agency as an adverse party on whom a copy of any notice of appeal and any statement of reasons, written arguments, or briefs must be served.
( d ) Hearings to present evidence on an issue of fact before an administrative law judge may be ordered by the Board of Land Appeals or the Director of the Geological Survey, as the case may be, in accordance with the procedure set forth in part 4 of this title.
[35 FR 10009, June 18, 1970, as amended at 36 FR 7206, Apr. 15, 1971; 38 FR 10009, Apr. 23, 1973]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            1708
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1715
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               82
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1715
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    62
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   101
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (39)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (39)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (39)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 305

 309

 320

 321

 311

 294

 270

 322

 323

 306

 310

 256

 192

 190

 186

 211

 234

 276

 324

 388

 399

 412

 430

 429

 409

 409

 402

 356

 337

 354

 298

 299

 307

 315

 297

 236

 236

 273

 286

 280

 261

 190

 182

 183

 173

 179

 211

 230

 278

 327

 371

 393

 414

 407

 398

 399

 356

 328

 307

 288

 301

 303

 314

 317

 302

 258

 245

 289

 307

 298

 299

 214

 187

 186

 178

 193

 223

 247

 300

 352

 380

 401

 423

 421

 404

 404

 391

 341

 319

 339

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
-
                         UNOFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION


Koninklijke Ahold N.V.
at Zaandam, The Netherlands


Date:                                                         Reference:
24 February 2003                                              03-018.rjmd/cmo



Auditors' report accompanying notification by management based on Section 2:362
para. 6 of the Netherlands Civil Code of facts that have become known after the
adoption of the annual accounts for 2001 at the general meeting of shareholders
held on May 7, 2002


Auditors' report based on Section 2:362 para. 6 of the Netherlands Civil Code

We have read the attached notification based on Section 2:362 para. 6 of the
Netherlands Civil Code dated 24 February 2003 by the management of Koninklijke
Ahold N.V. at Zaandam. The management is responsible for the content of this
notification. We do not disagree with the content of the notification.
Considering the text of the notification we hereby announce that we no longer
maintain our auditors' opinions in connection with the annual accounts for 2000
and 2001 and no longer permit the publication of these opinions.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche Accountants
(No. 735

Claimant awarded $5,000.00.)

#### Brennan Packing Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Franchise *tax*— when *refund will be awarded.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court in *Herenden Milling Go.*v. *State, supra.*

Moran, Paltzer & O’Donnell, *for claimant.*

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Edward C. Fitch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for refund of franchise taxes erroneously paid to the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois, by above named claimant in the year 1921, in the amount of $5,000.00.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, is, as a matter of law, sustained.

On the grounds of social justice and equity, we award claimant the sum of $5,000.00.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7056

HELMAR CHRISTOPHER OLSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOBBY TAYLOR, Correctional Officer, Mountain View 

Correctional Institution; MARL FOSTER, Correctional Officer,

Mountain View Correctional Institution; JAY MOODY, 

Correctional Captain, Mountain View Correctional 

Institution; MIKE SLAGLE, Asst. Superintendent for Programs, 

Mountain View Correctional Institution; MARGIE LAWLER, Asst. 

Superintendent for Custody and Operations, Mountain View 

Correctional Institution; SUSAN WHITE, Superintendent/

Mountain View Correctional Institution,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-00160-RJC)

Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Helmar Christopher Olson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Helmar Christopher Olson appeals the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, 

denying his motion to reconsider, and denying his motion to 

transfer venue. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Olson v. Taylor, No. 1:11-cv-00160-RJC 

(W.D.N.C. May 24 & June 7, 2012). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 744

 802

 799

 810

 783

 748

 760

 759

 758

 758

 768

 767

 779

 788

 716

 741

 767

 762

 739

 725

 721

 745

 714

 698

 691

 721

 704

 716

 716

 714

 726

 718

 735

 761

 751

 719

 732

 741

 743

 748

 752

 763

 706

 736

 675

 684

 701

 727

 703

 714

 693

 701

 726

 691

 679

 675

 683

 674

 686

 673

 685

 688

 728

 779

 778

 786

 740

 737

 753

 753

 753

 755

 765

 757

 763

 713

 708

 721

 751

 748

 727

 718

 713

 739

 697

 687

 686

 704

 691

 706

 698

 697

 708

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### Thomas Betts, Jr., Executor, Appellant, v. Leander E. Ketchum et al., Appellees.

Gen. No. 5546.

This case is controlled by the decision in Commercial Nat. Bk. v. Kirkwood, 172 Ill. 563.

Bill in chancery. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Du Page county; the Hon. Richard S. Farrand, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1911.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 13, 1912.

Joseph A. Reuss and John *W.*Leedle, for appellant.

Alschulee, Putnam & James and A. H. Switzer, for appellee, Mary Ketchum.

Mr. Justice Morton W. Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

One branch of this case was before this court and is reported in Ketchum v. Sears, 154 Ill. App. 52, which contains a sufficient statement of the facts.

*271This is a bill in chancery by complainant, in the nature of a creditor’s bill, to compel defendant Sears to pay the amount of his judgment, $1,905.04, claiming that the defendant Sears is liable therefor, under the agreement made with the Ketchums at the time the farm was sold and Weidert .paid to him the balance of the purchase money.

The trial court found and decreed that Sears pay Mary Ketchum the $900 balance due her under said agreement and that he pay complainant $537.40, the balance in his hands, to apply on complainant’s judgment; and complainant appeals. The day after the deed to said farm was filed for record, Sears paid to Ketchum $2,874.80, the balance of said purchase money except the $900 due Mary and the $537.40 the estimated one-third of the Betts claim, which at that time had been sued upon, but was not in judgment, and which one-third would have been payable to Mary if the Betts claim had been entirely defeated.

Complainant claims that under the agreement between the Ketchums, Sears became a trustee, and is liable to plaintiff for the full amount of his judgment; but we cannot agree with that contention.

Weidert paid the purchase money to Sears with instructions to pay and satisfy all liens against said lands, which was done. The agreement between the Ketchums concerned themselves alone, and while it might have benefited the plaintiff, yet he was in no way a party to it, and until he had signified his acceptance, there was no privity of contract or mutuality between him and Sears; and being so Ketchum had the right to rescind his direction to Sears and to demand any and all of the funds remaining in his hands except the $900 which belonged to Mrs. Ketchum, and should have been paid to her by Sears when she signed the deed.

We think that the case of Commercial National *272Bank v. Kirkwood, 172 Ill. 563, lays down the principle governing this case.

Finding no error in the record, the decree of the trial conrt is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*