alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      31.2**




SECTION
      302 CERTIFICATION




I,
      Michael Hillmeyer, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Avantogen Oncology, Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as the end of the period covered by this report; and




c)
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, based on our evaluation as of the end of
      the
      period covered by this report.


Date:
                    August 9, 2007By:
              /s/
                    Michael HillmeyerMichael
                    HillmeyerChief
                    Financial Officer
### §458aaa–8. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458aaa–8 was editorially reclassified as section 5389 of this title.
### §976. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 87–629, §6, Sept. 5, 1962, 76 Stat. 430, which provided that nothing in this subchapter would affect any claims filed against the United States by the Ponca Tribe before Sept. 5, 1962, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §686. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1011, §3, 68 Stat. 879, which provided that payments made under former sections 684 to 686 of this title would not be considered "other income and resources", was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §375d. Disposition of estates of intestate members of Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Seminole Nations of Oklahoma dying without heirs

Upon the final determination of a court having jurisdiction or by decision of the Secretary of the Interior after a period of five years from the death of the decedent, it is determined that a member of the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, or Seminole Nations or Tribes of Oklahoma or a person of the blood of said tribes has died intestate without heirs, owning trust or restricted Indian lands in Oklahoma or an interest therein or rents or profits therefrom, such lands, interests, or profits shall escheat to the Nation or tribe from which title to the trust or restricted Indian lands or interest therein was derived and shall be held thereafter in trust by the United States for said nation or tribe.

(Pub. L. 91–240, May 7, 1970, 84 Stat. 203.)
### §677k. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1009, §12, 68 Stat. 874, which related to adjustment of debts in making per capita payments to mixed-blood members and execution of mortgages on property, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3425.1-2 Contents of application.

No specific form of application is required. Three copies of the application, including preliminary and other data required by this subpart shall be filed. The lands applied for shall be described in accordance with subpart 3471 of this title. The application must be accompanied by the filing fee (43 CFR 3473.2).
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22128]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3631]


State of Ohio; Amendment <greek-i>1

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
September 21, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
reestablish the incident period for this disaster as beginning August 
27, 2004, and continuing.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is November 18, 2004 and for 
economic injury the deadline is June 20, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: September 23, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-22128 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
### §895. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–197, §3(b), Dec. 22, 1973, 87 Stat. 770

Section, acts June 17, 1954, ch. 303, §6, 68 Stat. 251; July 14, 1956, ch. 601, 70 Stat. 544; July 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–488, §1(a), 72 Stat. 290, authorized hiring of management specialists by tribe to assist tribe in studying industrial programs for reservation.
#### § 35.15 Ex parte contacts.

No party or person (except employees of the ALJ's office) shall communicate in any way with the ALJ on any matter at issue in a case, unless on notice and opportunity for all parties to participate. This provision does not prohibit a person or party from inquiring about the status of a case or asking routine questions concerning administrative functions or procedures.
118 South McCrary Road, Columbus, MS 39702 August 27, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Subj ect : Exemption Request under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

Reference (a) FAA Letter dated August 11, 2015 notifying deficiency in response to 11.81 from Brittany Newton

(b) CFR Title 14, chapter 1, subchapter B, Part 11, Subpart A, 11.81
Ms. Newton, In reply to reference (a), and In accordance with reference (b), ONVOI submits the following additional information regarding how granting the exemption would benefit the public

. During the past year t he FAA has acknowledged the significant technological advances in small UAS have led to a fast developing commercial market for produc ts produced by small UAVs and also technology that support s providing a saf e operating environment for SUAS for other aircraft in the NAS. The use of small unmanned aircraft will lead to more efficient methods of performing certain commercial tasks that are currently performed by other methods. Proposed Rule 107 lists ONVOI ’s sUAS initiatives as operations that can be safely conducted under a framework similar to that proposed by ONVOI

. Recently the FAA acknowledged the experience that military pilots bring to the UAS field

. ONVOI ’s executive manage ment team is comprised of retired military pilots with thousands of hours operating aircraft in the NAS and conducting military UAS operations in combined airspace

. Additionally, w e have conducted large military UAS operations safely from International airports under ICAO flig ht rules in controlled/ combined airspace. We understand the impact UAS operations have on general aviation operations

. A ll of our UAS operators are FAA certificated pilots

. As a Veteran Owned Small Business, we fo cus on hi ring veterans and only recruit personnel to support our UAS division with military UAS experience. We understand aviation operations and the unique impact small UAS operations can have on the airspace.

ONVOI will share data collected during UAS operations with the FAA which will allow org anizations to become much more efficient, productive
, and contribute to reducing risks to the aviation operations within the NAS. Sincerely,

David Ricker , COO
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22096]



[[Page 58992]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3626]


State of Louisiana; Amendment <greek-i>1

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
September 17, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning September 
13, 2004, and continuing through September 17, 2004.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is November 15, 2004 and for 
economic injury the deadline is June 15, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: September 23, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-22096 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### **Subchapter C—The Tax Court**

Part
I.
Organization and jurisdiction.
II.
Procedure.
III.
Miscellaneous provisions.
IV.
Declaratory judgments.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title X, §1042(d)(2)(F), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1639, struck out in item relating to part IV "relating to qualification of certain retirement plans" after "Declaratory judgments".

**1974**—Pub. L. 93–406, title II, §1041(c), Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 951, inserted item relating to part IV.
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]

Electronic                                        1077 Business Center Circle
Sensor                                            Newbury Park, California 91320
Technology                                        Tel. (805) 480-1994
                                                  FAX (805) 480-1984

October 3, 2005



James Frey
1305 Ballantre Court
McClean, VA 22101


Dear Jim:


          On February 21, 2005, you entered into a letter agreement with
Electronic Sensor Technology, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"),
pursuant to which the Company appointed you to the position of Chairman of the
Board of Directors for the Company for a two year term (the "Letter Agreement").
To induce you to serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, the
Company made certain assurances to you regarding equity compensation
("Assurances") and purported to execute on those assurances by means of the
Letter Agreement. Following the execution and delivery of the Letter Agreement,
each of you and the Company have concluded that the Letter Agreement did not
satisfy the Assurances. Accordingly, as no meeting of the minds has occurred,
each of you and Company agree that the Letter Agreement is null and void and
that each of you and the Company shall be restored to your and its respective
position prior to the execution and delivery of the Letter Agreement.

          Until such time, if any, as (i) you and the Company shall enter into a
new agreement, (ii) you resign or are replaced as Chairman of the Board of
Directors or (iii) you cease being a director of the Company, you shall continue
to serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Execution by you
of this letter (which may be in counterparts) in the space provided below shall
indicate your agreement to the terms outlined above. This letter is to be
construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of
Nevada and contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
subject mater hereof. This letter may not be assigned by either party.


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:                           ELECTRONIC SENSOR TECHNOLOGY,
                                                  INC.


/s/ James Frey                                    By:     /s/ Matthew S. Collier
------------------------------------------           ---------------------------
James Frey                                        Matthew S. Collier
                                                  President and Chief Executive
                                                  Officer
Sacramento

River

T28N R3W

TTEEHH AA MM AA CC OO

21

29 28

20

32 33

27

22

17 16

34

15

207.5 L

207.3 L

Bend

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

Contract No. 14-06-200-4736A-R-1

Exhibit B

Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc.

725-202-23

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.25

Miles

Date: November 1, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\driscoll_strawberry_assoc\driscoll_strawberry.mxd
### §963. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 87–235, §3, Sept. 14, 1961, 75 Stat. 508, which related to per capita distribution to tribal members out of funds appropriated to pay a judgment dated Feb. 11, 1960, and provided for tax exemption of the funds so distributed, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 556

 573

 589

 582

 557

 552

 563

 558

 529

 560

 600

 598

 584

 594

 589

 534

 530

 532

 503

 482

 517

 525

 569

 579

 565

 610

 642

 632

 632

 566

 589

 501

 506

 542

 534

 498

 472

 496

 490

 487

 485

 518

 536

 520

 539

 536

 488

 493

 488

 430

 397

 480

 486

 483

 504

 518

 542

 576

 572

 536

 536

 541

 527

 548

 560

 556

 532

 509

 533

 520

 512

 531

 556

 562

 548

 563

 567

 512

 513

 504

 475

 428

 497

 508

 527

 544

 541

 572

 616

 598

 569

 549

 563

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 1, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 15,861

 15,953

 16,046

 16,138

 16,164

 16,161

 16,203

 16,179

 16,102

 16,072

 16,110

 16,092

 16,043

 16,039

 16,061

 15,984

 15,930

 15,909

 15,813

 15,722

 15,689

 15,655

 15,622

 15,656

 15,715

 15,789

 15,879

 15,972

 16,051

 16,077

 16,113

 529

 532

 535

 538

 539

 539

 540

 539

 537

 536

 537

 536

 535

 535

 535

 533

 531

 530

 527

 524

 523

 522

 521

 522

 524

 526

 529

 532

 535

 536

 537

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
EXHIBIT 31.1
  CERTIFICATIONS OF
 
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 AND PRINCIPAL
 
 ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 302 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Antonio Treminio, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Novo Energies Corporation.
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
 
 6. I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: July 14, 2009
 
 
 /s/ Antonio Treminio
 Antonio Treminio
 Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934




For the month of   January, 2003
Commission File Number 333-7182-01

                                   CEZ, a. s.
                   ------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)


                                c/o Duhova 2/1444
                                 140 53 Prague 4
                                 Czech Republic
                   ------------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                      Form 20-F  X       Form 40-F
                                ---                ---

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
                                            ----

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
                                            ----

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                             Yes       No  X
                                 ---      ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________


<PAGE>
The following information was filed by CEZ, a. s. in Czech language with the
Prague Stock Exchange as required by its rules and regulations:

We have received the Czech Securities Commission Notice of the commencement of
an administrative proceeding. The subject of that proceeding is an alleged
breach of some provisions of the Securities Act. In our opinion, we have
committed no breach of the Securities Act and we believe that we will succeed in
proving the same.

<PAGE>
                                   Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                                  CEZ, a. s.
                                        -----------------------------------
                                                 (Registrant)

Date:  January 24, 2003
                                        By:
                                           --------------------------------
                                                   Libuse Latalova
                                            Head of Finance Administration
#### Egon Bergson et al., Appellants, v. United States Lines Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7298

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRY D. JONES, a/k/a Rick,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-37)

Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry D. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order denying Jones’s Rule 59

motion is marked as “filed” on July 29, the district court’s

records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on July 30.

Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, it is the date that the judgment or order was entered on

the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district

court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Terry D. Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998) and the district court’s order denying his motion to

alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Jones, No. CR-95-37 (E.D.

Va. June 10, 1998; July 30, 1998).* See also Brown v. Angelone,

150 F.3d 370 (4th Cir. 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 2920.1 Uses.
#### § 2450.8 Preference right of petitioner-applicant.

Where public land is classified for entry under section 7 of the Taylor Grazing Act or under the Small Tract Act pursuant to a petition-application filed under this part, the petitioner-applicant is entitled to a preference right of entry, if qualified. If, however, it should be necessary thereafter for any reason to reject the application of the preference right claimant, the next petitioner-applicant in order of filing shall succeed to the preference right. If there is no other petitioner-applicant the land may be opened to application by all qualified individuals on an equal-opportunity basis after public notice or the classification may be revoked by the authorized officer.