alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, DC

---------------------------------------------------------------

KYLA THORINGTON, et al. :

:

Complainants, : 

v. : Docket DOT-OST-2013-0092

:

UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and :

PRIMEFLIGHT AIRLINE SERVICES, INC. :

:

Respondents. : 

---------------------------------------------------------------

UNCONTESTED MOTION OF UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Thomas Newton Bolling

Vice President and Deputy General Counsel

Richard A. Fiore

Associate General Counsel-Litigation & 

Intellectual Property

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

233 South Wacker Drive

11th Floor - HDQLD

Chicago, IL 60606

(872) 825-8068

(872) 825-7077

thomas.bolling@united.com

richard.fiore@united.com

Douglas P. Kelley

Senior Counsel-Regulatory, Antitrust & 

Competition

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

1600 Smith Street

HQSLG-15

Houston, TX 77002

(713) 324-5156

doug.kelley@united.com

May 15, 2013

Karine R. Faden

Managing Counsel-Regulatory, 

Antitrust & Competition

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

1225 New York Avenue, N.W.

Suite 1100 DCALD

Washington, DC 20005

(202) 521-4363

karine.faden@united.com

Lorraine B. Halloway

Gerald F. Murphy

CROWELL & MORING LLP

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

(202) 624-2500

lhalloway@crowell.com

gmurphy@crowell.com

Counsel for

United Airlines, Inc.
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, DC

---------------------------------------------------------------

KYLA THORINGTON, et al. :

:

Complainants, : 

v. : Docket DOT-OST-2013-0092

:

UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and :

PRIMEFLIGHT AIRLINE SERVICES, INC. :

:

Respondents. : 

---------------------------------------------------------------

UNCONTESTED MOTION OF UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER

Pursuant to Rule 405 of the Department’s Rules of Practice, Respondent United Airlines, 

Inc. (“United”), respectfully moves for an extension of time, to May 31, 2013, to file its answer

to the Complaint of Contractor Employees Assisting Passengers of United Airlines at 

Philadelphia International Airport filed by Complainants Kyla Thorington, Henry Carter, John 

Stewart and Shante Smith on May 2, 2013 (the “Complaint”) in this proceeding. United 

discussed this motion with Complainants’ representative on May 15, 2013, and Complainants’

representative advised that Complainants would have no objection to the extension sought by 

United.

United submits that good cause exists to grant this uncontested motion.1 Given the nature 

of the legal issues raised in the Complaint, the location of Philadelphia International Airport

(PHL) – a major airport at which United (and its United Express carriers) operate and contract 

with Respondent PrimeFlight Aviation Services, Inc. (“PrimeFlight”), related actions involving 

PrimeFlight at PHL and other airports, and the prospective involvement of other regulatory 

 

1

See 14 C.F.R. § 302.405(b); see also, e.g., Notice Granting Extension dated March 

30, 2012 in Docket DOT-OST-2012-0040.
### §2210. Tax exemption

All lands or interests in land acquired by the United States for an Indian or Indian tribe under authority of this chapter shall be exempt from Federal, State and local taxation.

(Pub. L. 97–459, title II, §211, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2519.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary S. Jacob, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



March 31, 2010

/s/ GARY S. JACOB Gary S. Jacob Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
### §179. Driving stock to feed on lands

Every person who drives or otherwise conveys any stock of horses, mules, or cattle, to range and feed on any land belonging to any Indian or Indian tribe, without the consent of such tribe, is liable to a penalty of $1 for each animal of such stock. This section shall not apply to Creek lands.

(R.S. §2117; Mar. 1, 1901, ch. 676, §37, 31 Stat. 871; June 30, 1902, ch. 1323, §17, 32 Stat. 504.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2117 derived from act June 30, 1834, ch. 161, §9, 4 Stat. 730.
#### § 704.201 Administration; compensation districts.

For the purpose of administration of this Act, the District of Columbia shall be the compensation district and is designated as District No. 40.
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT


The undersigned, NUI Corporation, AGL Resources Inc. and its wholly owned
subsidiary, Cougar Corporation, are each party to an Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated July 14, 2004 (the "Merger Agreement"), pursuant to which AGL
Resources has agreed to purchase all of the outstanding shares of NUI
Corporation on the terms described therein (the "Transaction"). Capitalized
terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings
given to such terms in the Merger Agreement.

WHEREAS, Article 6 of the Merger Agreement sets forth certain conditions to the
parties closing the Transaction, including but not limited to the Required
Consents being obtained and the Required Consents becoming Final Orders;

WHEREAS, the Merger Agreement defines the consent of the Florida Public Service
Commission ("FPSC") as a Required Consent;

WHEREAS, each of the undersigned has agreed that the receipt of a Required
Consent from the FPSC is not in fact a legal requirement for the consummation of
the Transaction;

NOW THEREFORE, for the premises and covenants provided herein the undersigned
hereby agree as follows:

(1)    AGL Resources and Cougar Corporation agree that for purposes of
       determining whether the conditions required to be fulfilled to close the
       Transaction set forth in Sections 6.1(d), 6.2(b) and 6.2(c) of the Merger
       Agreement have been satisfied, each of AGL Resources and Cougar
       Corporation hereby waives the condition required to be fulfilled to close
       the Transaction with respect to obtaining a Required Consent from the
       FPSC under the terms and conditions of Sections 6.1(d), 6.2(b) and 6.2(c)
       of the Merger Agreement.

(2)    NUI Corporation agrees that for purposes of determining whether the
       conditions required to be fulfilled to close the Transaction set forth in
       Section 6.1(d) of the Merger Agreement have been satisfied, it hereby
       waives the condition required to be fulfilled to close the Transaction
       with respect to obtaining a Required Consent from the FPSC under the
       terms and conditions of Section 6.1(d) of the Merger Agreement.

The undersigned agree that any agreement or waiver expressed herein does not
constitute or imply an agreement or waiver of any other condition or term of the

<PAGE>

Merger Agreement, including, but not limited to, those expressed in Section
6.2(d) of such agreement. This agreement shall not be amended, modified,
rescinded or revoked in any way, except through the express written agreement of
each of the undersigned.

<PAGE>


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this supplemental agreement as of
the 23rd day of September, 2004


NUI CORPORATION

/s/ Steven D. Overly
-----------------------------
Steven D. Overly
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary


AGL RESOURCES INC.

/s/ Richard O'Brien
--------------------------------
Richard O'Brien
Executive Vice President and CFO


COUGAR CORPORATION

/s/ Richard O'Brien
--------------------------------
Richard O'Brien
Executive Vice President and CFO
August 27, 2015

Mr. Thomas Smith

11309 Clearspring Way

Indianapolis, IN 46239

Dear Mr. Smith:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your June 1, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2429, but 

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 816.64

 816.40

 816.15

 815.84

 815.58

 815.36

 815.15

 814.85

 814.53

 814.24

 813.94

 813.60

 813.17

 812.76

 812.38

 812.00

 811.35

 810.46

 809.62

 808.82

 807.90

 807.00

 806.13

 805.14

 804.49

 803.06

 801.87

 800.58

 799.27

 798.08

 24.16

 23.95

 23.74

 23.48

 23.26

 23.08

 22.91

 22.66

 22.40

 22.16

 21.92

 21.64

 21.30

 20.98

 20.68

 20.39

 19.89

 19.22

 18.61

 18.03

 17.38

 16.76

 16.17

 15.51

 15.09

 14.18

 13.46

 12.69

 11.95

 11.29

STORAGE

-0.22

-0.21

-0.21

-0.26

-0.22

-0.18

-0.18

-0.25

-0.26

-0.24

-0.24

-0.27

-0.34

-0.32

-0.30

-0.29

-0.50

-0.67

-0.62

-0.58

-0.65

-0.62

-0.59

-0.66

-0.42

-0.90

-0.73

-0.76

-0.75

-0.65

CHANGE

220

228

228

199

215

234

240

204

196

211

208

189

157

162

177

180

74

-19

3

23

-11

-4

0

-19

88

-146

-58

-77

-71

-28

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 322

 321

 321

 320

 320

 320

 319

 318

 318

 318

 317

 312

 316

 315

 317

 314

 313

 311

 310

 309

 307

 300

 286

 302

 291

 300

 300

 297

 296

 294

OUTLET

 10

 10

 14

 11

 5

 6

 9

 11

 10

 12

 14

 15

 13

 10

 10

 14

 12

 6

 5

 5

 10

 11

 11

 10

 10

 10

 9

 10

 9

 8

C.F.S.

 .36

 .38

 .50

 .40

 .17

 .21

 .33

 .40

 .36

 .45

 .53

 .58

 .51

 .38

 .40

 .55

 .47

 .23

 .23

 .21

 .43

 .50

 .51

 .46

 .49

 .51

 .48

 .55

 .51

 .45

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .22

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JUNE 2022 RUN DATE: 07/14/2022

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -13.09 3,003 9,304 0 300 12.54 .44

ACRE-FEET -13,090 5,956 18,454 0 595

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 18,454

 18,454

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .44

JULY 1, 2021 12.11

 24.38

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2021 TO DATE = 11.83
NEWS RELEASE

For Immediate Release


       WorldHeart Files Form 10-QSB and Updates on Chief Financial Officer
                                   Transition


Oakland, CA, USA - May 17, 2005: (NASDAQ: WHRT, TSX:WHT) - World Heart
Corporation ("WorldHeart" or the "Company"), a global technology leader in
mechanical circulatory support systems, has completed its first quarter 2005
regulatory filings and, as has been previously announced, reports that Mark
Goudie, Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer will leave his
employment with the Company effective today.


Mr. Goudie oversaw the consolidation of the Canadian commercial operations of
WorldHeart to Oakland, California, which is now substantially complete. For
personal and family reasons, Mr. Goudie has chosen not to relocate from Ottawa,
Canada to California. WorldHeart is actively in the process of hiring a new
Chief Financial Officer.

Mr. Goudie will remain on the WorldHeart Board of Directors and will act as a
consultant to WorldHeart through September 2005 providing continuity, advice,
and other assistance during this period.

"We are on track to complete the consolidation of the Canadian operation from
Ottawa to Oakland, California by the end of this quarter", commented Jal S.
Jassawalla, WorldHeart's President and CEO. "I would like to thank Mark, for an
on time and efficient transfer to California and for staying on, in different
capacities, through September 2005."

About World Heart Corporation:
World Heart Corporation is a global medical device company headquartered in
Oakland, California, USA with an additional facility in Heesch, Netherlands.
WorldHeart's registered office is Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Any forward-looking statements in this release are made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risk and
uncertainties, including without limitation, risks in product development and
market acceptance of and demand for the Company's products, risks of downturns
in economic conditions generally, and in the medical devices markets, risks
associated with costs and delays posed by government regulation, limitations on
third-party reimbursement, inability to protect proprietary technology,
potential product liability and other risks detailed in the Company's filings
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

For more information, please contact:

World Heart Corporation
Peggy Allman
510/563-4721
www.worldheart.com
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                           For the month of March 2005

                         Commission File Number: 0-30852

                          GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.

                          Galicia Financial Group S.A.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                          Tte. Gral. Juan D. Peron 456
                       (C1038AAJ) Buenos Aires, Argentina
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F X  Form 40-F
                                    ---           ---
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                   Yes     No X
                                      ---    ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
                                    --------
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K

                           Commission File No. 0-30852

Month Filed        Event and Summary                                 Exhibit No.

March 2005         Financial statements of the Registrant for the        99.1
                   fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, presented
                   in comparative format
<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                   GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A. (Registrant)



Date:  March 29, 2005              By:  /s/ Antonio Garces
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:   Antonio Garces
                                        Title:  Chief Executive Officer
#### Gaskins *v.*Lovett, and *vice versa.*

November 18, 1910.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Mitchell. Berrien superior court. January 15, 1909.

*Lankford & Dickerson,*for plaintiff.

*Hendricks & Christian,*for defendant.

Evans, P. J.

A married woman sought to cancel a contract for the sale of her land, upon the ground that the vendee was the agent of her husband, and had obtained the contract in pursuance of a fraudulent scheme to buy her land without having the Sale approved by the superior court of her domicile; and to enjoin the vendee pendente lite from transferring the contract. The evidence at the interlocutory hearing was conflicting, and the court did not abuse his discretion in refusing the injunction.

*Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Carlton Henderson, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59344;

First District (4th Division)

June 12, 1974.

*789Paul Bradley and Allen Wiederer, both of the State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., and Barry Rand Elden, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE BURMAN.
- CtrSpecExh1SutterAtt8: Contractor Specific, Sutter Exhibit 1, Attach. 8
#### § 3503.28 Does BLM incorporate any special requirements to protect the lands and resources?

BLM will specify permit or lease stipulations to adequately use and protect the lands and their resources. This may include stipulations which are required by the surface managing agency, or which are recommended by the surface managing agency or non-federal surface owner and accepted by BLM. (See also part 3580 of this chapter.)
### §483a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 483a was editorially reclassified as section 5135 of this title.
### §475. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 475 was editorially reclassified as section 5121 of this title.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Public Service Commission, etc. Gravesend Avenue Route (Route No. 49).

Motion to confirm report of Commissioners granted. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4751 

To revise the definition of a broker for purposes of certain reporting requirements with respect to digital asset transfers under the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2022 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. 

PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To revise the definition of a broker for purposes of certain 

reporting requirements with respect to digital asset 

transfers under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INFORMATION REPORTING FOR BROKERS AND 

4 DIGITAL ASSETS. 

5 (a) CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF BROKER.— 

6 Subparagraph (D) of section 6045(c)(1) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986, as added by section 80603(a)(3) 

8 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4751 IS

1 Law 117–58), is amended by striking ‘‘is responsible for 

2 regularly providing any service effectuating’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘regularly effectuates’’. 

4 (b) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—Section 80603 of 

5 the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act is amended 

6 by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following: 

7 ‘‘(d) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.— 

8 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION OF BROKER.—Nothing in this 

9 section or the amendments made by this section 

10 shall be construed to create any inference that a per11 son described in section 6045(c)(1)(D) of the Inter12 nal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by this section, 

13 includes any person solely engaged in the business 

14 of— 

15 ‘‘(A) validating distributed ledger trans16 actions, without providing other functions or 

17 services, or 

18 ‘‘(B) selling hardware or software for 

19 which the sole function is to permit persons to 

20 control private keys which are used for access21 ing digital assets on a distributed ledger. 

22 ‘‘(2) BROKERS AND TREATMENT OF DIGITAL

23 ASSETS.—Nothing in this section or the amendments 

24 made by this section shall be construed to create any 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4751 IS

1 inference, for any period prior to the effective date 

2 of such amendments, with respect to— 

3 ‘‘(A) whether any person is a broker under 

4 section 6045(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue 

5 Code of 1986, or 

6 ‘‘(B) whether any digital asset is property 

7 which is a specified security under section 

8 6045(g)(3)(B) of such Code.’’. 

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact11 ment of section 80603 of the Infrastructure Investment 

12 and Jobs Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 3153.1 Geophysical permit requirements.

Except in unusual circumstances, permits for geophysical exploration on unleased lands under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense shall be issued by the appropriate agency of that Department. In the event an agency of the Department of Defense refers an application for exploration to the Bureau for issuance, the provisions of subpart 3152 of this title shall apply. Geophysical exploration on lands under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense shall be authorized only with the consent of, and subject to such terms and conditions as may be required by, the Department of Defense.