alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### City Bank Farmers Trust Company, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Leonard Lewisohn, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Samuel Cohen, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

*657Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Shientag, J.

(dissenting). I dissent. The application for leave to enter a deficiency judgment having been made within the time limited by section 1083 of the Civil Practice Act, the proceeding did not become a nullity because the order directing service by mail upon the defendant specified, in consequence of a typographical error, an erroneous address of the defendant. That error, made by the plaintiff in good faith, was not a jurisdictional defect, but only an irregularity which the court, under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act, had the power to correct and should have corrected under the circumstances of this case, in the exercise of a sound discretion.

The plaintiff’s motion to set down for hearing, on a day certain, its pending application for leave to enter a deficiency judgment under section 1083 of the Civil Practice Act should have been granted.

Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur in decision; Shientag, J., dissents in opinion in which Dore, J. P., concurs.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. [See *post,*p. 709.]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA system approach to aircraft optimizationMutual couplings among the mathematical models of physical phenomena and parts of a system such as an aircraft complicate the design process because each contemplated design change may have a far reaching consequence throughout the system. Techniques are outlined for computing these influences as system design derivatives useful for both judgemental and formal optimization purposes. The techniques facilitate decomposition of the design process into smaller, more manageable tasks and they form a methodology that can easily fit into existing engineering organizations and incorporate their design tools.Document ID19910014883Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsSobieszczanski-Sobieski, Jaroslaw*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1991Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:104074NASA-TM-104074Meeting InformationMeeting: NATO-AGARD Structures and Materials Panel MeetingLocation: BathStart Date: April 28, 1991End Date: May 5, 1991Accession Number91N24196Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-50Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910014883.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe ultraviolet spectrum of HH 24A and its relation to optical spectraThe spectrum of the brightest part (HH 24A) of the complex Herbig-Haro object HH 24 in the short wavelength UV range was studied. The object is of special interest since it is known that in the optical range the continuum is due to dust scattered light originating in a young stellar object while the shock excited emission lines are formed in HH 24A itself. The spectrum shows only a continuum or a quasi-continuum and is not comparable to that of the typical high excitation object like HH1 or HH2 nor to that of a low excitation object like HH3 or HH47.Document ID19910018737Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBoehm, K. H.*(Washington Univ. Seattle., United States)*Noriega-Crespo, A.*(Washington Univ. Seattle., United States)*Solf, J.*(Max-Planck-Inst. fuer Astronomie Heidelberg (Germany, F.R.)., United States)*Brugel, E. W.*(Colorado Univ. Boulder., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryAstronomyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:188649NASA-CR-188649Accession Number91N28051Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-45Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910018737.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Ellen R. Quinlan, Respondent, *v.*The City of Utica, Appellant.

(Argued May 27,1878;

decided June 4, 1878.)

Reported below, 11 Hun, 217.

*A. Coburn*for appellant.

*S. M. Lindsley*for respondent.

Agree to affirm. No opinion.

All concur, except Allen, J., absent.

Judgment affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2436

RODNEY J. BROWNLOW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

INFORMATION BUILDERS, INCORPORATED; GERALD

COHEN; HARRY LERNER; DAVE KEMLER; LILA

GOLDBERG; JULIE DAVIS; DAVE SMALL; SEAN

MCCARTHY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-786-A)

Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 5, 2003

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney J. Brownlow, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Alan Lindsay, Jessica

Regan Schneider, SEYFARTH SHAW, Washington, D.C. for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Rodney J. Brownlow appeals the district court’s order awarding

summary judgment to his former employer in his civil action in

which he alleged constructive discharge, discriminatory discharge,

discrimination with respect to other terms and conditions of his

employment, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Brownlow v. Information Builders, Inc., No. CA-02-786-A

(E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 3503.13 For what areas may I receive a hardrock mineral permit or lease? Subject to the consent of the surface managing agency, you may obtain hardrock mineral permits and leases only in the following areas: ( a ) Lands identified in Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1946, for which jurisdiction for mineral leasing was transferred to the Secretary of the Interior. These include lands originally acquired under the following acts: ( 1 ) 16 U.S.C. 520 (Weeks Act);
( 2 ) Title II of the National Industrial Recovery Act (40 U.S.C. 401, 403a and 408);
( 3 ) The 1935 Emergency Relief Appropriation Act (48 Stat. 115 and 118);
( 4 ) Section 55 of Title I of the Act of August 24, 1935 (49 Stat. 750 and 781); and
( 5 ) The Act of July 22, 1937 (7 U.S.C. 1011 (c) and 1018 (repealed), Bankhead-Jones Act).
( b ) Lands added to the Shasta National Forest by Act of March 19, 1948 (62 Stat. 83);
( c ) Public Domain Lands within the National Forests in Minnesota (16 U.S.C. 508 (b));
( d ) Lands in New Mexico that are portions of Juan Jose Lobato Grant (North Lobato) and Anton Chica Grant (El Pueblo) as described in section 1 of the Act of June 28, 1952 (66 Stat. 285);
( e ) Lands in the Shasta and Trinity Units of the Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity National Recreation Areas;
( f ) The following National Park Lands: ( 1 ) Lake Mead National Recreation Area;
( 2 ) Glen Canyon National Recreation Area; and
( 3 ) Lands in the Whiskeytown Unit of the Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity National Recreation Area;
( g ) Lands patented to the State of California for park or other purposes where minerals were reserved to the United States; and
( h ) White Mountains National Recreation Area, Alaska.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 359

 370

 371

 347

 315

 371

 360

 374

 419

 406

 387

 373

 396

 411

 426

 413

 418

 419

 449

 459

 487

 481

 490

 461

 479

 459

 473

 476

 468

 497

 502

 307

 349

 317

 291

 277

 311

 312

 327

 385

 348

 372

 317

 330

 373

 369

 394

 342

 366

 390

 425

 396

 446

 418

 412

 406

 385

 405

 432

 375

 447

 460

 326

 355

 346

 310

 292

 335

 334

 344

 407

 379

 381

 342

 352

 399

 396

 404

 381

 395

 416

 443

 433

 465

 449

 436

 434

 422

 429

 452

 422

 476

 482

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 9,633

 9,673

 9,712

 9,735

 9,774

 9,764

 9,715

 9,694

 9,756

 9,784

 9,755

 9,716

 9,725

 9,799

 9,884

 9,990

 10,087

 10,189

 10,287

 10,409

 10,535

 10,695

 10,846

 10,951

 11,077

 11,162

 11,277

 11,434

 11,575

 11,755

 11,911

 321

 322

 324

 325

 326

 325

 324

 323

 325

 326

 325

 324

 324

 327

 329

 333

 336

 340

 343

 347

 351

 357

 362

 365

 369

 372

 376

 381

 386

 392

 397

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4609 

To authorize the project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 

ecosystem restoration, Texas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2022 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To authorize the project for hurricane and storm damage 

reduction and ecosystem restoration, Texas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Texas Coastal Spine 

5 Authorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COASTAL TEXAS PROTECTION AND RESTORATION 

7 FEASIBILITY STUDY, TEXAS. 

8 The Secretary of the Army is authorized to carry out 

9 the project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 

10 ecosystem restoration, Texas, substantially in accordance 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4609 IS

1 with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described 

2 in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 

3 16, 2021, at an estimated total cost of $30,906,287,000, 

4 with an estimated Federal cost of $19,237,894,000 and 

5 an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,668,393,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
# Determination to Make Available Assistance for Sudan

# Memorandum for the  Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of the

Consistent with the authority vested in me by the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense and for the Reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan, 2004 (Public Law 108-106), under the heading “International Disaster and Famine Assistance,” I hereby determine that it is in the national interest of the United States and essential to efforts to reduce international terrorism to furnish $20 million in assistance for Sudan from funds made available under that heading. 

                    The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to report this determination to the Congress and to arrange for its publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 04-22101

Billing code 4710-10-P
#### § 3503.33 Will BLM issue me a lease for unsurveyed lands?

No. All leased areas must be officially surveyed to BLM standards. If you are applying for a permit or lease on unsurveyed or protracted lands, you must pay for the survey. If BLM intends to issue a lease by competitive bidding, we will pay for surveying the lands.
#### § 3164.4 Damages on restricted Indian lands.

Assessments for damages to lands, crops, buildings, and to other improvements on restricted Indian lands shall be made by the Superintendent and be payable in the manner prescribed by said official.
#### § 3137.25 How will the parties to the unit know if BLM approves the unit agreement?

BLM will notify the unit operator in writing when it approves or disapproves the proposed unit agreement. The unit operator must notify, in writing, all parties to the unit agreement within 30 calendar days after receiving BLM's notice of approval or disapproval.
#### Frances Geraci, Respondent, v. Robert J. Bodkin, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order setting aside the verdict of a jury in his favor on the ground that it is against the weight of the evidence and granting a new trial. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ro opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
§ 35.33 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing shall be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written statement or deposition. Any such written statement must be provided to all other parties along with the last known address of such witness, in a manner which allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena such witness for cross-examination at the hearing. Prior written statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing and deposition transcripts shall be exchanged as provided in § 35.22(a) of this part.
( c ) The ALJ shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to ( 1 ) Make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth,
( 2 ) Avoid needless consumption of time, and
( 3 ) Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
( d ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( e ) At the discretion of the ALJ, a witness may be cross-examined on matters relevant to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his or her direct examination. To the extent permitted by the ALJ, cross-examination on matters outside the scope of direct examination shall be conducted in the manner of direct examination and may proceed by leading questions only if the witness is a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party.
( f ) Upon motion of any party, the ALJ shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. The rule does not authorize exclusion of— ( 1 ) A party who is an individual;
( 2 ) In the case of a party that is not an individual, an officer or employee of the party appearing for the entity pro se or designated by the party's representative; or
( 3 ) An individual whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including an individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed change in procedures; notice of extension of comment period. 

# SUMMARY:

                        SBA published a Notice of a proposed change in procedures on August 6, 2004 seeking comments on its proposed revisions to its procedures implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) specifically relating to loans made                               ( print page 59290)                            under its business loan assistance programs, as well as seeking comments on a proposed assessment of the effects of the Agency's 7(a) business loan program and 504 certified development company program upon the environment. The comment period closes on October 5, 2004. Due to a request from the public for an extension of time for comments and SBA's desire to have a meaningful dialogue on these issues, SBA is extending the time period for comments through December 15, 2004.                     

# DATES:

The comment period for the Notice of proposed change in procedures published August 6, 2004 (69 FR 47971) is extended through December 15, 2004. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        You may submit comments, identified by a reference to “NEPA Procedures Public Comments,” by any of the following methods: Through the Federal eRulemaking portal at                         *http://www.regulations.gov;*                         by mail to Eric S. Benderson, Associate General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, 7th Floor, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416; by e-mail (include reference to “NEPA Procedures Public Comments” in the subject line) to                         *eric.benderson@sba.gov;*                         or via facsimile to (202) 205-7154.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Eric S. Benderson, Associate General Counsel (202) 205-6636;                         *eric.benderson@sba.gov.*

Dated: September 28, 2004. 

Ronald E. Bew, 

Associate Deputy Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 04-22187 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Go to Content

U.S. Department of the InteriorBureau        of Reclamation

Contact UsMP Site Index 

Long-Term Water Transfer Program

CVP Homepage

MP Region Home Page 

Public	 Affairs

Area Offices

About Us

Programs & Activities

Water Operations

CVP Improvement Act

Environmental Documents (NEPA)

U.S. Department        of the Interior

Reclamation HomeReclamation    OfficesNewsroomLibrary Projects & Facilities

## Long-Term Water Transfers EIS/EIR Public Scoping Report

### Long-Term Water Transfers       Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report     Public Scoping Report

| Report only           | Chapter 1 - Introduction            Chapter 2 - Public Comments Received through ScopingChapter 3 - Commenters | 913 KB  |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|
| Appendices (separate) | Appendix A: Public Notification Materials                                                                      | 1.8 MB  |
|                  | Appendix B: Scoping Meeting Materials                                                                          | 4.9 MB  |
|                  | Appendix B: Scoping Meeting Materials (PowerPoint Presentation)                                                | 931 KB  |
|                  | Appendix C: Scoping Comments Received (public comments, questions and comments, emails, and correspondence)    | 3.8 MB  |
|                  | Appendix C: Scoping Comments Received (continued) (e-mails, correspondence and maps)                           | 5.1 MB  |
|                  | Appendix C: Scoping Comments Received (continued) (e-mails and correspondence)                                 | 3.6 MB  |
| Full Report           | Report and all appendices (Note: This is a large file)                                                         | 20.7 MB |
| Full appendices       | All appendices (Note: this is a large file)                                                                    | 19.9 MB |

 For assistance or additional information about this website, please contact Public Affairs**Bureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region**2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento CA  95825-1898     Main 916-978-5100   |   FAX 916-978-5114   |   TTY 916-978-5608 Reclamation  Officials' Telephone Numbers

----

 Last update:        September 26, 2012
fssn_ex103.htm

EXHIBIT 10.3
  
 EXHIBIT 2
  
 Assets Owned by Score, Inc.
  
 Score’s Digital Assets:
  
 ● ScoreCEO Website: www.scoreceo.com
  
 Redirects to ScoreCEO.com
  
 ● Credit-repair-software-for-free.com
  
 ● Creditrepairfreesoftware.com
  
 ● Creditrepairsoftwareprogram.com
  
 ● Creditrepairsoftwareservices.com
  
 ● Disputeceo.com
  
 ● Free-credit-repair-software.com
  
 ● Free-creditsoftware.com
  
 ● Freecreditrepair-software.com
  
 ● Freecreditrepairautomation.com
  
 ● Score-software.com
  
 ● Scoreinc.com Website: www.scoreinc.com
  
 Redirects to Scoreinc.com
  
 ● ScorewaySolution.com
  
 ● 10xyourcreditrepairbusiness.com
  
 ● Mydisputemail.com
  
 ● Credit Repair Summit Website: www.creditrepairsummit.com
  
 Redirects to CRS
  
 ● Creditrepairseminars.com
  
 Assets include, without limitation, all source codes and related coding.
Sacramento

River

T13N R1E

T12N R1E

T13N R2E

T12N R2E

Kirkv

Boyers Landing

Poffenbergers Landing

3 2 1

36

25

35

26

6

34

27

11 12

30

31

10 7

SSUUTTTTEE RR CCOO

YYOOLL OO CC OO

CCOOLLUUSSAA CC OO

53.9 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-1415A-R-1

Exhibit B

Wakida, Tomio

725-202-133

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

Date: November 23, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\wakida_tomio_1415\wakida_tomio.mxd