alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4807 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4807

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate the Nulhegan River 
 and Paul Stream in the State of Vermont for potential addition to the 
    National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 8, 2022

Mr. Leahy (for himself and Mr. Sanders) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate the Nulhegan River 
 and Paul Stream in the State of Vermont for potential addition to the 
    National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nulhegan River and Paul Stream Wild 
and Scenic River Study Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT.

    (a) Designation for Study.--Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic 
Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(145) Nulhegan river and paul stream, vermont.--The 
        following segments:
                    ``(A) The approximately 22-mile segment of the main 
                stem of the Nulhegan River from the headwaters near 
                Nulhegan Pond to the confluence with the Connecticut 
                River, and any associated tributaries (including the 
                North, Yellow, Black, and East Branches).
                    ``(B) The approximately 18-mile segment of Paul 
                Stream from the headwaters on West Mountain to the 
                confluence with the Connecticut River, and any 
                associated tributaries.''.
    (b) Study and Report.--Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers 
Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(22) Nulhegan river and paul stream, vermont.--Not later 
        than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available 
        to carry out this paragraph, the Secretary of the Interior 
        shall--
                    ``(A) complete the study of the Nulhegan River and 
                Paul Stream segments in the State of Vermont described 
                in subsection (a)(145); and
                    ``(B) submit to the appropriate committees of 
                Congress a report describing the results of the study 
                described in subparagraph (A).''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 3203.17 How must I make payments if I am the successful bidder? ( a ) You must make payments by personal check, cashier's check, certified check, bank draft, or money order payable to the “Department of the Interior—Bureau of Land Management” or by other means deemed acceptable by BLM.
( b ) By the close of official business hours on the day of the sale or such other time as BLM may specify, you must submit for each parcel: ( 1 ) Twenty percent of the bid;
( 2 ) The total amount of the first year's rental; and
( 3 ) The processing fee for competitive lease applications found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter.
( c ) Within 15 calendar days after the last day of the sale, you must submit the balance of the bid to the BLM office conducting the sale.
( d ) If you fail to make all payments required under this section, or fail to meet the qualifications in § 3202.10, BLM will revoke acceptance of your bid and keep all money that has been submitted.
#### Sheshadri RAJU, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant v. C. Thomas BOYLEN, MD; University of Southern California, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-60719.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 27, 2006.

Harvey Curtis Crowley, Schwartz & Associates, Brent H. Hazzard, Hazzard Law, Jackson, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Cecil Maison Heidelberg, Maison Heidelberg, Ridgeland, MS, for DefendantsAppellees.

Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-appellant Sheshadri Raju, M.D. appeals the district court’s judgment which dismissed his claims against defendant-appellee C. Thomas Boylen, M.D. under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. On appeal, plaintiff reasserts the arguments he made below to the effect that defendant was not entitled to absolute immunity for expert testimony given by *383defendant in another case. Specifically, he argues that defendant should be considered a complaining witness (and entitled only to qualified immunity) because he was to receive a contingent fee. He quarrels with the district court’s reading of history insofar as it relates to the granting of absolute immunity to witnesses. And he argues from the extremely limited exceptions to the absolute immunity granted to judges and prosecutors for similarly limited exceptions for expert witnesses. Finally, he asks that we certify the question whether absolute immunity should be granted to expert witnesses to the Supreme Court of Mississippi. The district court addressed and disposed of all of these arguments (except the request for certification) in a careful, thorough and scholarly opinion, and it would contribute nothing for us to repeat its analysis or conclusions. The district court got it exactly right. As for certification, there is no need to certify a question as to which the indisputably correct answer is at hand.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 3862.4-5 Proof by applicant of publication and posting.

After the 60-day period of newspaper publication has expired, the claimant will furnish from the office of publication a sworn statement that the notice was published for the statutory period, giving the first and last day of such publication, and his own statement showing that the plat and notice aforesaid remained conspicuously posted upon the claim sought to be patented during said 60-day publication, giving the dates.
Exhibit 23



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Partners

MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-121939, 333-60463, 333-60465 and 333-37888) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-66229) on Form S-3 of our report dated March 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 and the related financial statement
schedule of real estate and accumulated depreciation, our report dated March 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 and the related financial statement schedule of real estate and accumulated depreciation,
our report dated March 15, 2005, on the related supplementary consolidating information of MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P., and our reports dated March 15, 2005, with respect to managements of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation
and MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. assessments of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,
for MeriStar Hospitality Corporation and MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P., which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P.



|            
|------------
|            
|/s/ KPMG LLP
|KPMG LLP    



McLean, VA

March 15, 2005
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

February-09

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In C

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Feb-09 0000 0 0 9 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 10 1,017 2-Feb-09 0000 0 0 9 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 10 1,009 

3-Feb-09 0000 0 0 9 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 10 1,007 

4-Feb-09 3000 3 0 12 15 2 0 0 0 2 0 8 10 1,011 

5-Feb-09 0000 0 0 12 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 1,010 

6-Feb-09 0000 0 0 12 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 1,044 

7-Feb-09 3000 3 0 15 15 2 0 0 0 2 0 10 10 919 

8-Feb-09 0000 0 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 1,023 

9-Feb-09 0300 0 3 15 18 0 2 0 0 0 2 10 12 1,027 

10-Feb-09 0000 0 0 15 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 12 1,030 

11-Feb-09 0344 4 7 19 25 0 2 3 3 3 5 13 17 1,687 

12-Feb-09 0004 0 4 19 29 0 0 0 3 0 3 13 19 1,892 

13-Feb-09 6040 10 0 29 29 4 0 3 0 7 0 19 19 2,445 

14-Feb-09 0080 8 0 37 29 0 0 5 0 5 0 24 19 1,960 

15-Feb-09 0080 8 0 45 29 0 0 5 0 5 0 30 19 1,906 

16-Feb-09 0 0 20 0 20 0 65 29 0 0 13 0 13 0 43 19 1,980 

17-Feb-09 3 0 24 0 27 0 92 29 2 0 16 0 18 0 61 19 2,219 

18-Feb-09 9074 16 4 108 33 6 0 5 3 11 3 71 22 2,073 

19-Feb-09 0 0 19 0 19 0 127 33 0 0 13 0 13 0 84 22 2,475 

20-Feb-09 0980 8 9 135 42 0 6 5 0 5 6 89 28 2,907 

21-Feb-09 6080 14 0 149 42 4 0 5 0 9 0 98 28 2,707 

22-Feb-09 9000 9 0 158 42 6 0 0 0 6 0 104 28 2,835 

23-Feb-09 0 0 4 12 4 12 162 54 0 0 3 8 3 8 107 36 2,929 

24-Feb-09 10 0 16 8 26 8 188 62 7 0 11 5 17 5 124 41 2,863 25-Feb-09 12 0 12 0 24 0 212 62 8 0 8 0 16 0 140 41 2,776 26-Feb-09 12 2 16 0 28 2 240 64 8 1 11 0 18 1 158 42 3,298 27-Feb-09 20 18 4 0 24 18 264 82 13 12 3 0 16 12 174 54 3,171 28-Feb-09 14 0 8 0 22 0 286 82 9 0 5 0 15 0 189 54 3,164 

Total 107 35 170 32 277 67 286 82 71 23 112 21 183 44 189 54 55,384 5

Banks Tr
### **CHAPTER 71—TRANSFEREES AND FIDUCIARIES**

Sec.
6901.
Transferred assets.
6902.
Provisions of special application to transferees.
6903.
Notice of fiduciary relationship.
6904.
Prohibition of injunctions.
6905.
Discharge of executor from personal liability for decedent's income and gift taxes.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–614, title I, §101(e)(2), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1837, added item 6905.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4631 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to direct the Secretary of the 

Interior to conduct a study of the Deerfield River for potential addition 

to the national wild and scenic rivers system, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2022 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. WARREN, and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to direct the 

Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of the Deerfield River for potential addition to the national wild 

and scenic rivers system, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deerfield River Wild 

5 and Scenic River Study Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY; REPORT. 

7 Section 5 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

8 U.S.C. 1276) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4631 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(145) DEERFIELD RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS

4 AND VERMONT.—The entire river, including— 

5 ‘‘(A) the North, South, East, and West 

6 Branches of the Deerfield River; and 

7 ‘‘(B) the major tributaries of the Deerfield 

8 River, including the Green River, North River, 

9 South River, Clesson Brook, Chickley River, 

10 Cold River, Gulf Brook, Bog Brook, and Dun11 bar Brook.’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the 

13 following: 

14 ‘‘(22) DEERFIELD RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS AND

15 VERMONT.—Not later than 3 years after the date on 

16 which funds are made available to carry out this 

17 paragraph, the Secretary of the Interior shall— 

18 ‘‘(A) complete the study described in sub19 section (a)(145); and 

20 ‘‘(B) submit to the appropriate committees 

21 of Congress a report describing the results of 

22 such study.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22427]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3623]


State of North Carolina (Amendment <greek-i>3)

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
September 27, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
include Alleghany, Ashe, and Wilkes Counties as disaster areas due to 
damages caused by Tropical Storm Frances occurring on September 7, 
2004, and continuing through September 12, 2004.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous county of Surry in the State of 
North Carolina; and Grayson County in the Commonwealth of Virginia may 
be filed until the specified date at the previously designated 
location. All other counties contiguous to the above named primary 
counties have previously been declared.
    The economic injury disaster number assigned to Virginia is 9AD500.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is November 9, 2004 and for 
economic injury the deadline is June 10, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008).

    Dated: September 29, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-22427 Filed 10-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-120606, 333-130941, 333-17533, 333-139918, 333-147387, 333-148740, 333-156799 and 333-156800) of ZipRealty, Inc. of our report datedMarch 10, 2010 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose,California 

March 10, 2010
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

July 19, 2024

CR-2023-0362

Martin Arrendondo Evenes v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Madison Circuit 

Court: CC-19-4608) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on July 19, 2024, the following action was taken 

in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
#### Olive Allott, Defendant in Error, v. William H. Bowers, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 16,327.

Landlord and *tenant*— what *constitutes eviction.*If tiLe landlord create, a nuisance either upon or near the demised premises it amounts *to*an eviction.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Michael F. Girten, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, *1910.*

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Opinion filed March 28, 1912.

Edward J. Kelley, for plaintiff in error.

William: A. Kogan, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case we are asked to reverse the action of the *574court below in denying a motion to vacate a judgment entered by confession on a lease, and to permit the defendant to plead to the merits.

The plaintiff in error, William H. Bowers, hereinafter called the tenant, was a tenant of a certain apartment in Chicago, under a written lease from the defendant in error, hereinafter called the landlord.. The apartment immediately above the one leased to said tenant was occupied by the landlord. It is claimed by the tenant that the landlord so used his apartment as to create a nuisance, and thereby prevented the quiet enjoyment of the premises occupied by the tenant. This, it is claimed, was done by the landlord and his guests making loud noises during the night, and by permitting the apartment to be used and frequented by drunken persons and to be used as a house of ill-fame.

After notifying the landlord in writing of his intention so to do, the tenant vacated the premises. The rent was paid for the time the tenant occupied the apartment, and the judgment entered by confession is for a period subsequent to this removal.

In support of his motion to vacate said judgment and for leave to plead, affidavits were filed tending to support the claims of the tenant. If the statements therein made were shown to be true, there would have been sufficient grounds for vacating the premises, without incurring any liability for rent for the period subsequent to the removal. This is upon the principle that if the landlord creates a nuisance either upon or near the premises, it will amount to an eviction. Wood, Landlord and Tenant, page 803.

In our opinion the motion of the tenant should have been allowed, the judgment vacated, and the tenant permitted to plead to the merits. The judgment will therefore be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to proceed in accordance with the opinion herein expressed.

*Reversed and remanded with directions.*
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Peter W. Blanks, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 56989;

First District (5th Division) —

July 27, 1973.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (Ronald P. Katz, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel,) for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Elmer C. Kissane, Patricia C. Bobb, and Ronald Lake, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

PER CURIAM.
SSUUTTTTEE RR CC OO

YYOOLLOO CC OO

27 26

22 23

34 35

25

24

36 33

28

T12N R2E

Robbins

38.8 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-889A-R-1

Exhibit B

Schreiner, Joe and Cleo

725-202-122

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

Date: November 22, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\schreiner_joe_and_cleo\schreiner_joe_and_cleo.mxd
### PART IV—FARMERS' COOPERATIVES

Sec.
521.
Exemption of farmers' cooperatives from tax.
[522.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1969**—Pub. L. 91–172, title I, §101(a), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 492, substituted "PART IV" for "PART III" as part designation.

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–834, §17(b)(5), Oct. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 1051, struck out item 522 "Tax on farmers' cooperatives".
Opinion issued November 22 , 201 9

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 9
- 00 910
- C V

——————————— IN RE RENEE JEFFERSON
- SMIT H , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OP I NION Relator, R enee Jefferson

- Smith , has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to h ave this Court issue an injunction to prevent the City of Houston from certifying election results and to enjoin certification of a candidate for placement
on the ballot in an u pc oming runof f election. 1

1 The under ly ing case is Renee Jefferson

- Smith v. City of Houston and Harris County, Texas , cause num ber 2019

- 81187 , pending in the 270 t h Di strict Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honor able Dedra Davis presiding

.2

We deny relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 52.8(a). We dismiss all other pending mot ions a s moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and H ightower

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 117 
          - [CGD01-04-122] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice of temporary deviation from regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations for the Newburyport US1 Bridge, mile 3.4, across the Merrimack River, Massachusetts. This deviation allows the bridge to remain in the closed position from 6 a.m. on October 18, 2004 through 6 p.m. on October 22, 2004. This temporary deviation is necessary to facilitate structural repairs at the bridge. 

# DATES:

This deviation is effective from October 18, 2004 through October 22, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John McDonald, Project Officer, First Coast Guard District, at (617) 223-8364. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Newburyport US1 Bridge, at mile 3.4, across the Merrimack River, has a vertical clearance of 35 feet at mean high water and 44 feet at mean low water in the closed position. The existing regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.605(a). 

The bridge owner, Massachusetts Highway Department, requested a temporary deviation from the drawbridge operating regulations to facilitate necessary structural repairs, the replacement of the locking pin motor and the brake unit, at the bridge. 

This deviation to the operating regulations allows the bridge to remain in the closed position from 6 a.m. on October 18, 2004 through 6 p.m. on October 22, 2004. 

This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35 and will be performed with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as soon as possible. 

Dated: September 17, 2004. 

David P. Pekoske, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 04-22274 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P