alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 35.39 Appeal to the Secretary of the Interior. ( a ) Any defendant who as filed a timely answer and who is determined in an initial decision to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment may appeal such decision to the Secretary by filing a notice of appeal with the Director in accordance with this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) A notice of appeal may be filed at any time within 30 days after the ALJ issues an initial decision. However, if another party files a motion for reconsideration under § 35.38 of this part, consideration of the appeal shall be stayed automatically pending resolution of the motion for reconsideration.
( 2 ) If a motion for reconsideration is timely filed, a notice of appeal may be filed within 30 days after the ALJ denies the motion or issues a revised initial decision, whichever applies.
( 3 ) The Director may extend the initial 30 day period for an additional 30 days if the defendant files with the Director a request for an extension within the initial 30 day period and shows good cause.
( c ) If the defendant files a timely notice of appeal with the Director and the time for filing motions for reconsideration under § 35.38 of this part has expired, the ALJ shall forward the record of the proceeding to the Director.
( d ) A notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a written brief specifying exceptions to the initial decision and reasons supporting the exceptions.
( e ) The representative for the Government may file a brief in opposition to exceptions within 30 days of receiving the notice of appeal and accompanying brief.
( f ) There is no right to appear personally before the Director.
( g ) There is no right to appeal any interlocutory ruling by the ALJ.
( h ) In reviewing the initial decision, the Director shall not consider any objection that was not raised before the ALJ unless a demonstration is made of extraordinary circumstances causing the failure to raise the objection.
( i ) If any party demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Director that additional evidence not presented at such hearing is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to present such evidence at such hearing, the Director shall remand the matter to the ALJ for consideration of such additional evidence.
( j ) The Director may affirm, reduce, reverse, compromise, remand, or settle any penalty or assessment determined by the ALJ in any initial decision.
( k ) The Director shall promptly serve each party to the appeal with a copy of the Department's decision and a statement describing the right of any person determined to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment to seek judicial review.
( l ) Unless a petition for review is filed as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3805 after a defendant has exhausted all administrative remedies under this part and within 60 days after the date on which the Director serves the defendant with a copy of the Department's decision, a determination that a defendant is liable under § 35.33 of this part is final and is not subject to judicial review.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 207

 211

 207

 218

 224

 221

 217

 220

 238

 208

 211

 242

 220

 225

 217

 218

 219

 224

 234

 224

 231

 227

 232

 237

 247

 252

 260

 276

 269

 270

 274

 194

 193

 195

 198

 192

 201

 202

 203

 203

 203

 204

 204

 206

 203

 201

 201

 203

 205

 208

 214

 216

 219

 222

 225

 231

 238

 241

 246

 249

 254

 259

 199

 199

 200

 203

 204

 207

 206

 207

 209

 206

 207

 212

 210

 210

 206

 206

 209

 210

 216

 218

 221

 223

 227

 231

 238

 244

 248

 253

 256

 260

 265

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 15, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Todd Benjamin International, Ltd. 

and others, Plaintiffs,

v.

TCA Fund Management Group 

Corp. and others, Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-21808-Civ-Scola

Order

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for leave 

to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 19.) After careful consideration of the briefing, 

the record, and the relevant legal authorities, the Court grants the Plaintiffs’

motion. (ECF No. 19.)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), a party seeking to 

amend its complaint more than twenty-one days after the defendant has served a 

responsive pleading or a motion to dismiss may do so only with the opposing 

party’s written consent or the court’s leave. Leave shall be freely given when 

justice so requires. Rule 15(a) reflects a policy of “liberally permitting 

amendments” and absent a “substantial reason to deny leave to amend” a 

plaintiff’s request should be granted. Espey v. Wainwright, 734 F.2d 748, 750 

(11th Cir. 1984). The Plaintiffs seek to amend their complaint in order to bring 

claims against defendants not named in the original complaint and not subject to 

the stay imposed by the receivership order entered in Securities and Exchange 

Commission v. TCA Fund Management Group Corporation, No. 20-

21964-CIV-ALTONAGA (S.D. Fla.) (the “SEC Action”). (ECF No. 19.) The Receiver

does not oppose the motion (ECF No. 19), and the Court granted the Plaintiffs 

leave to amend their complaint to add the new defendants in the SEC Action. (No. 

20-21964-CIV, ECF No. 297.) 

Therefore, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 19.) The stay 

imposed by the Court’s order staying and administratively closing the case (ECF 

No. 16) is lifted. The Clerk is directed to reopen this case. The Plaintiffs shall file 

their Amended Complaint (ECF No. 19-1) as a separate docket entry by 

September 6, 2022. 

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on August 31, 2022.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-21808-RNS Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 1 of 1
#### § 3583.3 Applications for hardrock mineral leases.

No specific form is required. An application shall include the applicant's name and address, a statement of holdings in accordance with subpart 3502 of this title, a description of the lands in accordance with subpart 3501 of this title, and the name of the mineral for which the lease is desired. The applicant shall state whether the mineral applied for can be developed in paying quantities, stating the reasons therefor, and shall furnish such facts as are available to him/her respecting the known occurrence of the mineral, the character of such occurrence and its probable value as evidencing the existence of a workable deposit of such mineral. Each application must be filed in triplicate in the proper BLM office and must be accompanied by the filing fee for Shasta and Trinity hardrock mineral leases found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter.

[51 FR 15213, Apr. 22, 1986, as amended at 72 FR 50888, Sept. 5, 2007]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.39

 130.57

 130.63

 130.88

 130.88

 130.39

 130.39

 130.05

 130.10

 130.15

 130.06

 130.07

 130.48

 130.91

 130.10

 129.15

 129.06

 129.28

 129.84

 130.12

 130.28

 130.28

 130.38

 130.53

 130.69

 130.78

 130.29

 130.28

 130.26

 130.09

 622

 641

 648

 676

 676

 622

 622

 586

 591

 596

 587

 588

 631

 679

 591

 499

 490

 510

 564

 593

 610

 610

 621

 636

 655

 665

 611

 610

 608

 590

STORAGE

-14

+19

+7

+28

+0

-54

+0

-36

+5

+5

-9

+1

+43

+48

-88

-92

-9

+20

+54

+29

+17

+0

+11

+15

+19

+10

-54

-1

-2

-18

CHANGE

130

125

109

101

69

38

69

28

80

118

110

124

188

140

34

29

40

39

67

87

120

85

85

79

73

63

55

67

67

66

INFLOW

 23

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 57

 46

 66

 85

 85

 85

 85

 49

 25

 25

 25

 29

 40

 45

 40

 35

 33

 31

 30

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

PUTAH

 113

 89

 80

 62

 44

 40

 12

 0

 11

 30

 30

 38

 81

 67

 53

 50

 20

 0

 0

 27

 71

 50

 46

 40

 33

 29

 53

 40

 40

 47

PUTAH

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .19

 .18

 .14

 .12

 .08

 .09

 .07

 .06

 .09

 .06

 .07

 .06

 .06

 .05

 .11

 .05

 .02

 .07

 .05

 .06

 .02

 .04

 .10

 .01

 .00

 .31

 .16

 .03

 .05

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.15

 2.07

 .11

 .25

 .08

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2002 RUN DATE: 12/19/2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -46 2,485 1,296 1,204 4 2.44 3.76

ACRE-FEET -46 4,929 2,571 2,388 8

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,388

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,571

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.76

JULY 1, 2002 3.76

 636

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
---

Exhibit 15.2


JAMES STAFFORDJames Stafford, Inc.Chartered Accountants
        Suite 350 – 1111 Melville Street
        Vancouver, British Columbia
        Canada V6E 3V6
        Telephone +1 604 669 0711
        Facsimile +1 604 669 0754
        www.JamesStafford.ca
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We consent to the incorporation of our report dated 26 March 2013 with respect to the financial statements of Alberta Star Development Corp. (the “Company”), which comprise the statements of financial position as at 30 November 2012, 30 November 2011 and 1 December 2010 and the statements of loss and comprehensive loss, cash flows and changes in equity for the years ended 30 November 2012 and 30 November 2011, in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company dated 5 April 2013. Vancouver, Canada 5 April 2013

   **Chartered Accountants**


---
```

[House Report 106-799]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-799

======================================================================

 
  PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION FOR THE 
ADJOURNMENT OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE FOR THE SUMMER DISTRICT WORK PERIOD

                                _______
                                

                 July 27, 2000.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 567]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 567, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of a 
concurrent resolution of either House providing for the 
adjournment of the two Houses during the summer district work 
period. The rule waives all points of order against the 
consideration of the resolution.
    While adjournment resolutions are ordinarily privileged, a 
point of order could be raised against the summer district work 
period resolution on the grounds that it violates section 310 
of the Budget Act, which requires that the House cannot adjourn 
for more than three calendar days in July if it has not 
completed action on all reconciliation bills.

                                  

```
### §648. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–400, §2, Sept. 16, 1970, 84 Stat. 838, which exempted funds distributed to members of the tribe from Federal and State income tax, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §931. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–116, §4(c), Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1121

Section, Pub. L. 86–322, §1, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 592, related to publication of notice of agreement to division of assets, closure of roll, preparation of roll, protest against inclusion or omission from roll, finality of determinations, and final publication.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 103–116, §17, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1138, provided that: "Except for sections 7, 8, and 12 [enacting sections 941e, 941f and 941j of this title], the provisions of this Act [enacting subchapter XLIII–A (§941 et seq.) of this title and provisions formerly set out as a note under section 941 of this title and repealing this subchapter] shall become effective upon the transfer of the Existing Reservation under section 12 [enacting section 941j of this title] to the Secretary."

[In accordance with the provisions of Pub. L. 103–116, a quitclaim deed transferring the existing reservation to the United States as Trustee for the Tribe was executed on Nov. 29, 1993. This conveyance was accepted on behalf of the United States, in trust, on Jan. 19, 1994. The deed was recorded Jan. 20, 1994.]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2013

p1021 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2013

147520

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147520

COA: 311319

Kent CC: 11

- 009155

- FC

MIGUEL ANGEL VIDANA,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 3809.560 Under what circumstances may I provide a blanket financial guarantee? ( a ) If you have more than one notice- or plan-level operation underway, you may provide a blanket financial guarantee covering statewide or nationwide operations instead of individual financial guarantees for each operation.
( b ) BLM will accept a blanket financial guarantee if we determine that its terms and conditions are sufficient to comply with the regulations of this subpart.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 315

 335

 350

 372

 360

 330

 335

 347

 350

 309

 295

 269

 271

 266

 278

 275

 282

 286

 319

 302

 273

 281

 308

 315

 337

 327

 335

 354

 359

 357

 355

 277

 299

 322

 319

 326

 313

 300

 307

 301

 290

 263

 245

 254

 237

 253

 249

 257

 265

 269

 260

 251

 253

 271

 276

 301

 304

 307

 333

 330

 336

 332

 301

 315

 330

 342

 345

 324

 316

 318

 325

 301

 274

 263

 263

 253

 265

 263

 269

 277

 293

 281

 264

 268

 288

 295

 320

 315

 320

 341

 345

 349

 343

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 16,112

 15,611

 15,095

 14,665

 14,231

 13,784

 13,368

 12,945

 12,574

 12,214

 11,858

 11,510

 11,154

 10,769

 10,426

 10,081

 9,753

 9,445

 9,271

 9,142

 9,035

 8,950

 8,910

 8,897

 8,888

 8,888

 8,898

 8,927

 8,964

 9,023

 9,065

 537

 520

 503

 489

 474

 459

 446

 432

 419

 407

 395

 384

 372

 359

 348

 336

 325

 315

 309

 305

 301

 298

 297

 297

 296

 296

 297

 298

 299

 301

 302

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### In the Matter of the Will of Jacob G. Dettmer, Deceased. Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences et al., Appellants; City Bank Farmers Trust Company, as Trustee under the Will of Jacob G. Dettmer, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

*878Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ. [178 Misc. 401.]
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |
| Date : April 14, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Stanley Weiner                              |   |
|                  |   | Name Stanley Weiner                                                                                                                                                                              |   |
|                  |   | Title Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|                  |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |
### Subpart A—Treatment of Qualifying Corporations

Sec.
991.
Taxation of a domestic international sales corporation.
992.
Requirements of a domestic international sales corporation.
993.
Definitions and special rules.
994.
Inter-company pricing rules.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Blast Energy Services,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John
      O’Keefe, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      June 2, 2006




By:
            /s/
                John O’KeefeJohn
                O’KeefeCo-Chief
                Executive OfficerChief
                Financial OfficerPrincipal
                Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7910

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RONALD EUSTACH, a/k/a Tony Stracan,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior

District Judge. (4:00-cr-00067-CMC-2)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Eustach, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, 

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina; 

Nancy Chastain Wicker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Eustach appeals from the district court’s 

orders denying his motions for reconsideration of his criminal 

judgment filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), 60(b). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Eustach, No. 4:00-cr-00067-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Sept. 18 & 

Oct. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 2711.3 Procedures for sale.