alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3284.3 What happens if the minimum initial unit obligations are not met? ( a ) If the unit operator does not drill a well designed to produce or utilize geothermal resources in commercial quantities within the timeframe specified in the unit agreement, or the unit operator relinquishes the unit agreement before meeting the minimum initial unit obligations: ( 1 ) BLM will deem the unit agreement void as though it was never in effect;
( 2 ) BLM will deem any lease extension based upon the existence of the unit as void retroactive to the date the unit was effective; and
( 3 ) Any lease segregations based on the unit become invalid.
( b ) BLM will send the unit operator a written decision confirming that the unit agreement is void.
### §721. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 23, 1954, ch. 831, §1, 68 Stat. 768, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to transfer lands held in trust by the United States for the Alabama and Coushatta Tribes to the State of Texas to be held by the State in trust for the benefit of tribes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 23.0

[VAVRINEK,
TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP LETTERHEAD]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our Independent Auditor's Report dated January 2, 2003 regarding the consolidated balance sheets of Coast Bancorp and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002
and 2001, in the Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

| | /s/ Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLPVavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
| |                                                                    | 

Laguna Hills, California
March 26, 2003

---

QuickLinks
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInterlaminar fracture characterization: A current reviewInterlaminar fracture characterization has been investigated for several years. Only now is it well enough understood for standardization organizations to attempt to write standard test methods. A review of the current philosophies in characterizing interlaminar fracture is presented. First, the mode 1, double cantilever beam test (DCB) for measuring G(sub 1c) and the end notched flexure (ENF) test for measuring G(sub 2c) are discussed. These tests have undergone the most extensive research throughout the years and are furthest towards standardization. In addition, the mode 2, end loaded split (ELS) specimen is discussed. Mixed mode fracture is also discussed and the recently developed mixed mode bending (MMB) test is detailed. Then, tests for evaluating mode 3 fracture toughness, including the split cantilever beam (SCB), are reviewed. Finally, the work done on interlaminar fracture characterization in fatigue is reviewed.Document ID19910019312Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMartin, Roderick H.*(Analytical Services and Materials, Inc. Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1991Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187573AD-A277704NASA-CR-187573Meeting InformationMeeting: Japan International SAMPE SymposiumLocation: TokyoCountry: JapanStart Date: December 11, 1991End Date: December 14, 1991Accession Number91N28626Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18599PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-50-04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910019312.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Herman Finkelstein v. Isadore Punie.

Motion granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 247

 240

 238

 238

 237

 180

 178

 178

 184

 201

 214

 177

 185

 186

 198

 176

 245

 276

 171

 219

 241

 243

 233

 230

 156

 144

 145

 144

 144

 151

 199

 204

 214

 218

 166

 165

 156

 153

 151

 154

 149

 149

 148

 145

 143

 141

 141

 141

 134

 166

 166

 171

 158

 133

 126

 118

 121

 123

 123

 121

 221

 223

 225

 229

 205

 171

 165

 165

 162

 173

 176

 158

 160

 158

 158

 152

 190

 205

 151

 199

 208

 215

 199

 180

 136

 131

 131

 132

 130

 131

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 7, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Prasad Chumble, EPA

Brianna Knoppow, EPA
#### In the Matter of Anna Kesdan, Appellant, against City of New York, Respondent.

Order denying appellant’s motion, pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, for leave to serve a notice of claim after the expiration of the statutory period, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Holán, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. | 274 A pp. Div. 801.]
### **Subchapter C—Certain Vaccines**

Sec.
4131.
Imposition of tax.
4132.
Definitions and special rules.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter C consisted of sections 4141 to 4143, 4151, and 4152 of this title.

Section 4141, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 487; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 805, §2(a), 69 Stat. 690; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §113(a), 72 Stat. 1278, imposed a tax equivalent to 10 percent of selling price on radio and television receiving sets, phonographs, radio, television, and phonograph combinations, components, and phonograph records, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–44, title II, §204, June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 140, applicable with respect to articles sold on or after June 22, 1965.

Section 4142, acts Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 487; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §113(a), 72 Stat. 1278; Oct. 13, 1964, Pub. L. 88–653, §6(a), 78 Stat. 1086, defined "radio and television components" and provided formula to determine selling price of rebuilt television picture tubes, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–44, title II, §204, June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 140, applicable with respect to articles sold on or after June 22, 1965.

Section 4143, Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §113(a), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1278, granted an exemption for certain types of communication, detection, and navigation equipment and components, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–44, title II, §204, June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 140, applicable with respect to articles sold on or after June 22, 1965.

Section 4151, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 488, imposed a tax equivalent to 10 percent of selling price upon the sale of musical instruments, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–44, title II, §204, June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 140, applicable with respect to articles sold on or after June 22, 1965.

Section 4152, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 488, related to exemption of musical instruments sold for religious or educational use, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §119(b)(2), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1286, effective on the first day of the first calendar quarter which began more than 60 days after Sept. 2, 1958.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 2,
1997 AND  THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF  INCOME  FOR  THE
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 2, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-02-1997
<CASH>                                           10,204,335
<SECURITIES>                                      4,165,250
<RECEIVABLES>                                    13,584,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1,209,645
<INVENTORY>                                      13,431,313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 44,554,574
<PP&E>                                           79,281,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                   36,799,258
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  100,810,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11,978,673
<BONDS>                                           8,676,594
<COMMON>                                          2,706,335
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       74,447,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    100,810,418
<SALES>                                          15,884,887
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 18,471,699
<CGS>                                            10,682,965
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    10,682,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     17,699
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  202,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     387,154
<INCOME-TAX>                                        135,503
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 251,651
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        251,651
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

                   [Letterhead of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP]


                                                  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                  1670 Broadway, Suite 1000
                                                  Denver, CO 80202
                                                  Telephone  (720)  931 7000
                                                  Facsimile   (720)  931 7100


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Amendment No.2 to Form S-3 of our report dated March 26, 2003
relating to the financial statements of Newmont Mining Corporation, which
appears in Newmont Mining Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

April 22, 2003
### §423. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 423, act May 22, 1902, ch. 821, §2, 32 Stat. 203, which related to second homestead entry by certain settlers, was transferred to section 187b of Title 43, Public Lands.
#### Wallace Wojtkowiak, Appellant, v. Joseph Wojtkowiak, as Executor of Pelagia Wojtkowiak, Deceased, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Genevieve Wojtkowiak, Appellant, v. Joseph Wojtkowiak, as Executor of Pelagia Wojtkowiak, Deceased, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action for an accounting and in an action for breach of contract to make a testamentary gift.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual Report of J. Allen Greer,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin Ericksteen,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                   --------------------------
Date: March 15, 2004                                   Kevin Ericksteen
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
§ 35.1 Basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* This part implements the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, Public Law 99-509, sections 6101-6104, 100 Stat. 1874 (Oct. 21, 1986), to be codified at 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812. 31 U.S.C. 3809 of the statute requires each authority head to promulgate regulations necessary to implement the provisions of the statute.
( b ) *Purpose.* This part: ( 1 ) Establishes administrative procedures for imposing civil penalties and assessments against persons who make, submit, or present, or cause to be made, submitted, or presented, false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or written statements to authorities or to their agents, and
( 2 ) Specifies the hearing and appeal rights of persons subject to allegations of liability for such penalties and assessments.
§ 2884.10 What should I do before I file my application? ( a ) When you determine that a proposed oil and gas pipeline system would cross Federal lands under BLM jurisdiction, or under the jurisdiction of two or more Federal agencies, you should notify BLM.
( b ) Before filing an application with BLM, we encourage you to make an appointment for a preapplication meeting with the appropriate personnel in the BLM field office nearest the lands you seek to use. During the preapplication meeting BLM can: ( 1 ) Identify potential routing and other constraints;
( 2 ) Determine whether or not the lands are located within a designated or existing right-of-way corridor;
( 3 ) Tentatively schedule the processing of your proposed application;
( 4 ) Provide you information about qualifications for holding grants and TUPs, and inform you of your financial obligations, such as processing and monitoring costs and rents; and
( 5 ) Identify any work which will require obtaining one or more TUPs.
( c ) BLM may share this information with Federal, state, tribal, and local government agencies to ensure that these agencies are aware of any authorizations you may need from them.
( d ) BLM will keep confidential any information in your application that you mark as “confidential” or “proprietary” to the extent allowed by law.
Record of Contacts

.;1,0 10- 0.2).. I

FOrtISDocket No. FAA~ __ • _

With whom outside the fAA has this proposaJ been discussed (e.g .• AT A, RAA, ALP A, etc.)?

" '"·~:t~~o·iiiDiii:!i;'~~,' '._-"'.~t~lIlcii':'ta~.ttd~?~·~.;-/_ ,*"~"Diu:ntt:t.r4

Doeing B.C. Linder 2I5J2iHO

Al"A Joe White 21512010

UNCONTROLlED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check IIle Master list Co vflI'Iy Th;oI This is e.e Can'ed RevisIon Before Use
KEVIN O'MALLEY, FATHER,

Appellant,

v.

ROBIN KLOB, MOTHER,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0259

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 16, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Hugh A. Carithers, Judge.

Caleb D. Rowland and William M Blume, Blume and Rowland, PLLC, Jacksonville, 

for Appellant.

Katherine B. Johnson of Zisser Law, PLLC, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### American Seeding Machine Company, Respondent, v. John A. MacArthur and Others, Appellants.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation filed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2003-16501; Airspace Docket No. 03-ACE-85]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Tipton, IA.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, April 15, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2525.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 2, 2003 (68 FR 67361). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on April 15, 2004. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO on January 16, 2004.

Elizabeth S. Wallis,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division Central Region.

[FR Doc. 04-2182  Filed 2-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 3834.23 When do I start paying the adjusted fees? ( a ) In the case of a CPI adjustment required by 30 U.S.C. 28j(c), you must pay the adjusted initial maintenance and location fees when you record a new mining claim or site located on or after the September 1 that immediately follows the date BLM published its notice about the adjustment.
( b ) In the case of adjustments required by other statute, you must pay the adjusted initial maintenance and location fees for a new mining claim or site as provided in the statute.
( c ) For previously recorded mining claims and sites, you must pay the CPI-based adjusted maintenance fee on or before the September 1 that immediately follows the date BLM published its notice about the adjustment.
( d ) Notwithstanding 43 CFR 3830.91(a)(3) and 3830.96, in any year in which BLM adjusts the maintenance and location fees, if you pay the fees timely, but pay an amount based on the fee in effect immediately before the adjustment was made, BLM will send you a notice, as provided in § 3830.94, giving you 30 days in which to pay the additional amount required to meet the adjusted fees. If you do not pay the additional amount due within 30 days after the date you received the notice, you will forfeit the affected mining claims or sites.
[70 FR 52030, Sept. 1, 2005]
## Subtitle I—Trust Fund Code
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MELINDA DELISLE, JACQUES DELISLE, ADAM DELISLE, BRYAN IRVIN, CHARLES CELLA, DEBORAH CELLA, MARY CAY CURRAN, ELIZA HARDY JONES, KRISTA NELSON, EILEEN MCGOVERN, CEDRIC
HARDY,

Petitioners

v.

KATHY BOOCKVAR, IN HER CAPACITY

AS SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND JESSICA MATHIS, IN HER CAPACITY

AS DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF

ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES OF

THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 95 MM 2020

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29 th day of May , 2020

, upon consideration of the Petitioners’

Petition for Review :

1. The Petition for Review was filed outside of the 180 day time period from

the date of enactment of Act No. 2019

– 77 during which this Court had exclusive jurisdiction to decide specified constitutional challenges to Act No.

2019

- 77. See Section 13(1)

- (3).

2. Petitioners ’ alternative request for King’s Bench or extraordinary jurisdiction

is denied.

3. The case is immediately transferred to the Commonwealth Court.

Justice Wecht files a concurring statement.
### §3411. No reduction in amounts

#### (a) In general

In no case shall the amount of Federal funds available to an Indian tribe that has in place an approved plan under this chapter be reduced as a result of—

(1) the enactment of this chapter; or

(2) the approval or implementation of a plan of an Indian tribe under this chapter.

#### (b) Interaction with other laws

The inclusion of a program in a tribal plan under this chapter shall not—

(1) modify, limit, or otherwise affect the eligibility of the program for contracting under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.); or

(2) eliminate the applicability of any provision of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.), as the provision relates to a specific program eligible for contracting under that Act.

(Pub. L. 102–477, §12, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2304; Pub. L. 115–93, §12, Dec. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 2034.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, which is classified principally to chapter 46 (§5301 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2017—Pub. L. 115–93 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "In no case shall the amount of Federal funds available to a tribal government involved in any demonstration project be reduced as a result of the enactment of this chapter."