alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3281.15 What is the minimum initial unit obligation a unit agreement must contain? ( a ) The unit agreement must: ( 1 ) Require the unit operator to drill, within the timeframe specified in the unit agreement, at least one unit well on a tract committed to the unit agreement;
( 2 ) Specify the location and the minimum depth and/or geologic structure to which the initial unit well will be drilled; and
( 3 ) Require the unit operator, upon completing a unit well, to provide to BLM in a timely manner the information required at § 3264.10 of this chapter.
( b ) Depending on the size of the proposed unit area, BLM may require the minimum initial unit agreement obligation to include the drilling of more than one unit well.
( c ) If necessary to aid in the evaluation of drilling locations, BLM and the unit operator may agree to include types of exploration operations as part of the initial unit obligation. An example of such work is drilling temperature gradient wells.
( d ) BLM will not consider any work done prior to unit approval for the purpose of meeting initial unit obligations.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59260-59261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Committee on Training in Primary Care Medicine and 
Dentistry; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee on Training in Primary Care Medicine 
and Dentistry.
    Dates and Times: October 21, 2004, 8:15 a.m.-4:30 p.m., October 
22, 2004, 8 a.m.-2 p.m.
    Place: The Hilton in Gaithersburg, 620 Perry Parkway, 
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877.
    Status: The meeting will be open to the public.
    Purpose: The Advisory Committee provides advice and 
recommendations on a broad range of issues dealing with programs and 
activities authorized under section 747 of the Public Health Service 
Act as amended by The Health Professions Education Partnership Act 
of 1998, Public Law 105-392. At this meeting the Advisory Committee 
will work on its draft fifth report which will be submitted to 
Congress and the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human 
Services in November 2005 and which focuses on measuring outcomes of 
Title VII, section 747 grant programs.
    Agenda: The meeting on Thursday, October 21, will begin with 
opening comments from the Chair of the Advisory Committee. A plenary 
session will follow in which Advisory Committee members will hear 
speakers address the topic of outcomes measurement from various 
perspectives. The Advisory Committee will work on its fifth report, 
both in plenary session and in smaller workgroups. An opportunity 
will be provided for public comment.
    On Friday, October 22, the Advisory Committee will continue work 
on the report. An opportunity will be provided for public comment.
    For Further Information Contact: Anyone interested in obtaining 
a roster of members or other relevant information should write or 
contact Jerilyn K. Glass, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Medicine and 
Dentistry, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and 
Services Administration, Room 9A-27, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers 
Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone (301) 443-6326. The web 
address for information on the Advisory Committee is http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/medicine-dentistry/actpcmd.


[[Page 59261]]


    Dated: September 27, 2004.
Tina M. Cheatham,
Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 04-22184 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
Exhibit 10.30

 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into as of October 25, 2007, by and between MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC., MEDTOX DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and MEDTOX LABORATORIES, INC., each a Delaware corporation (each individually, a "Borrower"), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("Bank"). Each reference herein to "Borrower" shall mean each and every party, collectively and individually, defined above as a Borrower. 

RECITALS  

WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Credit Agreement between Borrower and Bank dated as of December 1, 2005, as amended from time to time ("Credit Agreement"). 

WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement to reflect said changes. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows: 

1.        Section 1.1 (a) is hereby amended by deleting "November 1, 2007" as the last day on which Bank will make advances under the Line of Credit, and by substituting for said date "November 1, 2009." with such change to be effective upon the execution and delivery to Bank of a promissory note dated as of October 25, 2007 (which promissory note shall replace and be deemed the Revolving Line of Credit Note defined in and made pursuant to the Credit Agreement) and all other contracts, instruments and documents required by Bank to evidence such change. 

2.          Section 1.2 (a) is hereby amended (a) by deleting "November 1, 2007" as the last day on which Bank will make advances under the Loan Limit, and by substituting for said date "November 1, 2009," and (b) by deleting "Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000)" as the maximum principal amount available under the Loan Limit, and by substituting for said amount "Four Million Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars ($4,900,000)". 

 

|   | 3. | Section 1.2 (b) is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the following substituted therefor: |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

"(b)      Limitation on Borrowings. Each request for an advance under the Loan Limit shall be accompanied by Borrower's written statement as to the use of the proceeds of such advance and the source of repayment therefor and a copy of the invoice for the equipment being financed. Each such advance shall be subject to Bank's prior approval, which shall be at Bank's sole discretion, of the stated purpose and source of repayment. Each advance under the Loan Limit shall be available to a maximum of eighty percent (80%) of the purchase price of new equipment and a maximum of seventy five percent (75%) of the purchase price of used equipment (less insurance, freight, delivery, interest, taxes, installation, licenses, and similar costs)." 

 

----
§ 662.100 What is the One-Stop delivery system? ( a ) In general, the One-Stop delivery system is a system under which entities responsible for administering separate workforce investment, educational, and other human resource programs and funding streams (referred to as One-Stop partners) collaborate to create a seamless system of service delivery that will enhance access to the programs' services and improve long-term employment outcomes for individuals receiving assistance.
( b ) Title I of WIA assigns responsibilities at the local, State and Federal level to ensure the creation and maintenance of a One-Stop delivery system that enhances the range and quality of workforce development services that are accessible to individuals seeking assistance.
( c ) The system must include at least one comprehensive physical center in each local area that must provide the core services specified in WIA section 134(d)(2), and must provide access to other programs and activities carried out by the One-Stop partners.
( d ) While each local area must have at least one comprehensive center (and may have additional comprehensive centers), WIA section 134(c) allows for arrangements to supplement the center. These arrangements may include: ( 1 ) A network of affiliated sites that can provide one or more partners' programs, services and activities at each site;
( 2 ) A network of One-Stop partners through which each partner provides services that are linked, physically or technologically, to an affiliated site that assures individuals are provided information on the availability of core services in the local area; and
( 3 ) Specialized centers that address specific needs, such as those of dislocated workers.
( e ) The design of the local area's One-Stop delivery system, including the number of comprehensive centers and the supplementary arrangements, must be described in the local plan and be consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding executed with the One-Stop partners.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 737

 761

 751

 736

 744

 736

 749

 769

 676

 682

 702

 711

 592

 586

 597

 605

 642

 645

 651

 670

 662

 647

 629

 668

 615

 602

 607

 626

 630

 639

 664

 656

 724

 718

 651

 682

 679

 699

 656

 601

 610

 613

 594

 553

 562

 538

 549

 564

 607

 570

 557

 609

 597

 561

 616

 567

 545

 560

 587

 577

 618

 607

 699

 745

 731

 693

 713

 705

 721

 710

 639

 651

 668

 660

 570

 575

 566

 578

 609

 627

 613

 632

 633

 614

 588

 640

 580

 564

 586

 605

 602

 626

 623

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 13,080

 13,439

 13,776

 14,058

 14,344

 14,651

 14,981

 15,271

 15,485

 15,648

 15,873

 16,059

 16,270

 16,464

 16,590

 16,746

 16,940

 17,160

 17,364

 17,571

 17,827

 18,441

 19,029

 19,669

 19,573

 19,438

 19,323

 19,274

 19,222

 19,143

 19,067

 436

 448

 459

 469

 478

 488

 499

 509

 516

 522

 529

 535

 542

 549

 553

 558

 565

 572

 579

 586

 594

 615

 634

 656

 652

 648

 644

 642

 641

 638

 636

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                         For the month of October, 2007

                         Commission File Number: 0-30852

                          GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.

                          Galicia Financial Group S.A.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                            Tte. Gral. Juan D. Peron 456

                       (C1038AAJ) Buenos Aires, Argentina
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                         Form 20-F X Form 40-F
                                  ---          ---

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                   Yes    No X
                                      ---     ---
If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
                                                 ------
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K

                           Commission File No. 0-30852



Month Filed             Event and Summary                         Exhibit No.

October, 2007   Notice of Material Event, dated October 2, 2007,     99.1
                regarding the partial cancellation by Banco de
                Galicia y Buenos Aires S.A. (the Registrant's
                principal subsidiary) of the public offering for
                US$ 10,174,400 of Negotiable Obligations due in
                2010.
<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES
         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                            GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.
                                            (Registrant)



Date: October 4, 2007                       By: /s/Antonio Garces
                                                Name:  Antonio Garces
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4517 

To expand the eligible uses of firefighter assistance grant funds, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2022 

Mr. OSSOFF (for himself and Mr. HAWLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To expand the eligible uses of firefighter assistance grant 

funds, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fire Station Improve5 ment Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF FIREFIGHTER ASSISTANCE GRANT FUNDS. 

7 Section 33(c)(3)(J) of the Federal Fire Prevention 

8 and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229(c)(3)(J)) is 

9 amended to read as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4517 IS

1 ‘‘(J) To repair, modify, or improve fire sta2 tions, fire training facilities, and other similar 

3 facilities— 

4 ‘‘(i) to improve the functionality of 

5 those facilities; or 

6 ‘‘(ii) to protect the health and safety 

7 of firefighting personnel.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 2436

GENET LEMA , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DELTA AIRLINES, INCORPORATED , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Anthony John Trenga , Senior District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv - 01470

- AJT

- IDD )

Submitted : October 13 , 2022 Decided: October 17, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges , and KEENAN , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Genet Lema, Appellant Pro Se. Jocelyn Renee Cuttino, MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not bind ing precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-2436 Doc: 28 Filed: 10/17/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Genet Lema appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in
favor of Delta Airlines, Inc. , in Lema’s employment discrimination action

. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error

. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lema v. Delta Airlines, Inc. , No. 1:20

- cv - 01470

- AJT

- IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 19, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t he materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-2436 Doc: 28 Filed: 10/17/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
#### § 2720.0-6 Policy.

As required by the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, the Bureau of Land Management may convey a federally owned mineral interest only when the authorized officer determines that it has no known mineral value, or that the mineral reservation is interfering with or precluding appropriate nonmineral development of the lands and that nonmineral development is a more beneficial use than mineral development. Allegation, hypothesis or speculation that such conditions could or may exist at some future time shall not be sufficient basis for conveyance. Failure to establish by convincing factual evidence that the requisite conditions of interference or preclusion presently exist, and that nonmineral development is a more beneficial use, shall result in the rejection of an application.

[51 FR 9657, Mar. 20, 1986, as amended at 60 FR 12711, Mar. 8, 1995]
[LETTERHEAD OF WHITE & CASE LLP]

Direct Dial + +44(0) 20 7532 1400        ffitzherberbrockholes@whitecase.com


9 December, 2005


FFB:KFC


Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
as Depositary under the Deposit Agreement
referred to below
60 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005
U.S.A.



Ladies and Gentlemen:

We refer to the Registration Statement on Form F-6 under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the "Registration Statement"), relating to the American
Depositary Shares evidenced by American Depositary Receipts, each American
Depositary Share representing six ordinary shares, par value (pound)0.25 per
ordinary share, of Reuters Group PLC, a company organized and existing under the
laws of England and Wales. Terms used herein and not defined herein shall have
the meanings assigned to them in the deposit agreement, dated as of February 18,
1998, appearing as Exhibit (a)(1) to the Registration Statement, as proposed to
be amended and supplemented by the supplemental agreement to deposit agreement
appearing as Exhibit (a)(2) to the Registration Statement (the "Deposit
Agreement").

In rendering the opinions set forth herein, we have assumed that (i) the Deposit
Agreement will have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Company
and the Depositary and will constitute a valid and legally binding obligation of
the Company enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, (ii) the
relevant Deposited Securities will have been duly deposited with a Custodian
under and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, (iii) the
choice of New York law contained in the Deposit Agreement is legal and valid
under the laws of England and Wales and (iv) insofar as any obligation under the
Deposit Agreement is to be performed in, or by a party organized under the laws
of, any jurisdiction outside of the United States of America, its performance
will not be illegal or ineffective in any jurisdiction by virtue of the law of
that jurisdiction.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the American
Depositary Shares covered by the Registration Statement, when evidenced by
Receipts that are duly executed and delivered by the Depositary and issued in
accordance with the terms of the Deposit Agreement, will be validly issued and
will entitle the registered holders thereof to the rights specified in the
Deposit Agreement and those Receipts.

The foregoing opinion is limited to the federal laws of the United States and
the laws of the State of New York and we express no opinion as to the laws of
any other jurisdiction.

We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as Exhibit (d) to the Registration
Statement. In giving such consent, we do not admit thereby that we are within
the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        /s/ White & Case LLP
#### Claire Kane, Respondent, v. Henry Lang, Appellant.

Present — Holán, P. J., Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.; MaeCrate, J., not voting.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,999

 302

 307

 310

 326

 331

 333

 329

 321

 325

 329

 328

 323

 327

 329

 337

 343

 345

 343

 341

 341

 350

 366

 364

 364

 362

 362

 352

 358

 361

 267

 285

 295

 296

 306

 315

 312

 308

 307

 306

 304

 309

 312

 316

 318

 322

 335

 337

 337

 335

 333

 337

 341

 347

 351

 346

 341

 343

 348

 352

 351

 293

 301

 302

 315

 324

 325

 318

 313

 311

 312

 313

 315

 319

 322

 329

 338

 342

 339

 338

 337

 343

 356

 358

 359

 353

 348

 347

 352

 356

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 13, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 3107.71 Payment of compensatory royalty.

The payment of a compensatory royalty will extend the term of any lease for the period during which such compensatory royalty is paid and for a period of 1 year from the discontinuance of such payments.
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–28 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF S. 686, FOR THE 

RELIEF OF THE PARENTS OF THERESA MARIE SCHIAVO 

MARCH 21 (legislative day, MARCH 20), 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and 

ordered to be printed 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 182] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 182, by a nonrecord vote, reports the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the immediate consideration of S. 

686, a bill for the relief of the parents of Theresa Marie Schiavo, 

under a closed rule. The rule provides ten minutes of debate in the 

House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. The rule 

waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. 

Finally, the rule provides one motion to commit. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The Committee is not aware of any points of order against consideration of the bill. The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill is prophylactic in nature. 

Æ