alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §151. Deposits in bank by disbursing agents

Any United States Indian agent, superintendent, or other disbursing agent of the Indian Service may deposit Indian moneys, individual or tribal, coming into his hands as custodian, in such national bank or banks as he may select: Provided, That the bank or banks so selected by him shall first execute to said disbursing agent a bond, with approved surety, in such an amount as will properly safeguard the funds to be deposited. Such bond shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior.

(Apr. 30, 1908, ch. 153, 35 Stat. 73; June 25, 1910, ch. 431, §1, 36 Stat. 855; Mar. 3, 1928, ch. 122, 45 Stat. 161; Apr. 30, 1934, ch. 169, 48 Stat. 648.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section is also set out in the last two provisos of section 372 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Indian Agents

The services of Indian agents have been dispensed with. See note set out under section 64 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Transfer of disbursement functions of all Government agencies with certain exceptions to the Fiscal Service, Treasury Department, see note set out under section 53 of this title.
### Subpart B—Treatment of Distributions to Shareholders

Sec.
995.
Taxation of DISC income to shareholders.
996.
Rules for allocation in the case of distributions and losses.
997.
Special subchapter C rules.
#### § 3809.430 May I modify my plan of operations?

Yes, you may request a modification of the plan at any time during operations under an approved plan of operations.
San Mateo, CA
                                                                 March 31, 2000
                                                                 $1,597,501.74

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of one million five hundred ninety seven thousand five hundred one
dollars and 74 cents  ($1,597,501.74),  with  interest from the date hereof at a
rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, which amount shall be secured by all of the
assets of Borrower. Said principal shall be due and payable on demand by Lender,
which  demand may be made at any time,  but in no event shall the  principal  be
paid later than one hundred eighty (180) days after the date of this Note.  This
Note may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         2. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         3.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 31 day of March, 2000.

                                         Hypermedia Communications, Inc.



                                         By: __________________

                                         Title: ________________
#### § 3107.53 Undeveloped parts of producing leases.

Undeveloped parts of leases retained or assigned out of leases which are extended by production, actual or suspended, or the payment of compensatory royalty will continue in effect for 2 years after the effective date of assignment and for so long thereafter as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities.
#### Branan *v.*Southern Railway Company.

August 10, 1910.

Damages. Before Judge Reagan. I-Ienvy superior court. January 13, 1909.

*Reuben R. Arnold,*for plaintiff. *C. E. Bailie, Howell Hollis, Smith & Turner,*and *Harris £• Harris,*for defendant.

Holden, J.

The plaintiff brought suit for damages, alleging substantially as follows: After the train of the defendant, on which he was a passenger, blew for his station and began to slow up, he started to go into another coach to get a bundle he had left therein. The door of the car had been left open by defendant’s agents, ready for passengers to get out. ' As he got to the door, a violent jerk of the train caused him, in order to steady himself, to place his hand against the door, which swung to and cut off his finger. The door was defectively constructed; defendant’s agents negligently failed to push it back far enough to catch, and allowed it to swing loose; the engineer negligently caused the jerk'of the train just as plaintiff grasped the door, causing it to swing to and catch his finger; the road-bed at the point of injury was defective in specified particulars, which “contributed to said jerk of the train.” *I-Ield:*

1. Whether, after the train blew for his station and began to slow up, the plaintiff, in undertaking to go into another coach to get a bundle which he had left therein, was in this particular, or otherwise under the allegations of the petition, guilty of such negligence as would bar a recovery, was a question for the jury. *Cotchett*v. *Savannah &c. R. Co.,*84 *Ga.*687 (11 S. E. 553) ; *Augusta So. R. Co.*v. *Snider,*118 *Ga.*146 (44 S. E. 1005) ; *Central of Ga. Ry. Co.*v. *Forehand,*128 *Ga.*547 (58 S. E. 44).

2. The court committed error in dismissing the petition upon the general demurrer thereto.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*
379 P.2d 446

#### William Leon PINSON, Petitioner, v. E. M. PERRY, Justice of the Peace, Precinct No. 6, Eddy County, State of New Mexico, et al., Respondents.

No. 25 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

March 13, 1963.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the request for free process be and the same is hereby granted, and the application for writ of procedendo ad judicium be and the same is hereby denied.
### §389d. Rules and regulations

The Secretary shall have power to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of sections 389 to 389e of this title.

(June 22, 1936, ch. 692, §5, 49 Stat. 1804.)
### §1750e. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 105–83, title VII, §707, Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1626, which set forth provisions relating to eligibility for Federal services or benefits and taxation of payments and conveyances of land, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Engin

Modeling Motor Losses

• DOE developed a model describing 100

a motor’s losses as a function of

it’s rated horsepower. ­0.2505 y = 19.205x

2 R = 0.9767 • DOE plotted the standards adopted ­0.2507 y = 14.745x

2 by R = 0.9882 the Energy Independence and 

y = 

Securities Act of 2007 

(EISA): R 

10 • Delta (100­efficiency level) vs.

horsepower

• Plotted on a logarithmic scale,

delta decreased with according to

a power law (­.25 exponent)

1

1 10 

Efficiency(hp’) = 100% ­ K * (100% ­ Efficiency(1)) * (hp’)­0.25

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 08.4
Engin

Scaling from Equipment Classes Analyzed

• Assumptions:

• Efficiency can be defined as a function of horsepower.• DOE used the EISA standard for 1 hp, 4­pole, open constru

as a reference point for the equivalent small electric motor.

• A similar efficiency level (e.g. NEMA Premium level) for diffe

equipment classes can be described by some constant K.

Matrix of K Values used for Scaling CSLs

Polyphase CSIR CSCR

2 Poles 1.37 2.10 1.58

4 Poles 1.00 1.53 1.156 Poles 1.06 1.62 1.21

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 08.4
Engin

Preliminary Candidate Standard Levels

Candidate

Standard Level

Polyphase, 56

Frame 4­pole, 1

hp

CSIR, 48 Frame,

4­pole, 0.5 hp

CSCR, 5

4­pole, 

CSL 1 84.0% 70.8% 80.

CSL 2 85.5% 73.6% 82.

CSL 3 86.5% 75.4% 83.

CSL 4 88.0% 78.1% 85.

CSL 5 90.0% 81.8% 87.

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 08.4
Engin

Other Issues

DOE invites comments and recommendations from stakeho

any other aspects related to the engineering analysis

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 08.4
### §2208. Certain residents of possessions considered citizens of the United States

A decedent who was a citizen of the United States and a resident of a possession thereof at the time of his death shall, for purposes of the tax imposed by this chapter, be considered a "citizen" of the United States within the meaning of that term wherever used in this title unless he acquired his United States citizenship solely by reason of (1) his being a citizen of such possession of the United States, or (2) his birth or residence within such possession of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 85–866, title I, §102(a), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1674.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to estates of decedents dying after Sept. 2, 1958, see section 102(d) of Pub. L. 85–866, set out as an Effective Date of 1958 Amendment note under section 2014 of this title.
Table 24

U.S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Preliminary Data Subject to Change Central Valley Operations Office

San Joaquin and Mendota Pool

Monthly Deliveries in AF 2016

Water User Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Fresno Slough WD 11 94 83 100 337 286 172 67 78 98 78 28 1,432

Tranquility Public Utilities District 

(TPUD) (formerly Hughes, Melvin) 0 13 8 0 14 30 14 0 22 0 0 0 101

James ID 0 0 0 0 3,323 7,170 2,455 0 0 0 0 0 12,948

Meyers (SLWD) 1,634 1,170 14 32 46 130 1,078 623 1,467 1,566 0 0 7,760

Dudley & Indart (formerly Coelho-GardnerHanson) 17 96 404 448 270 600 457 469 225 310 208 0 3,504

Mid-Valley WD (no contract) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reclamation District #1606 0 0 4 52 57 100 15 0 0 40 51 0 319

Terra Linda Farms (Coelho Family Trust) 0 164 320 404 1,054 1,031 1,081 567 569 400 97 0 5,687

Tranquility ID 0 2,161 1,137 1,802 2,945 5,859 5,665 2,935 1,335 193 369 0 24,401

Westlands WD (Lateral 6 & 7) 0 30 172 3,731 4,330 2,120 2,457 1,446 0 0 0 0 14,286

Lempesis V.L. (Wilson, JW) 0 6 20 48 62 104 45 42 26 31 19 0 403

Laguna WD (via CCID) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

San Luis WD (via CCID) 0 0 7 0 12 19 15 2 8 5 0 0 68

Total 1,662 3,734 2,169 6,617 12,450 17,449 13,454 6,151 3,730 2,643 822 28 70,909

Exchange Contractors

Central California ID (CCID) 0 8,282 27,466 27,128 41,431 62,091 65,107 57,304 33,923 14,109 8,108 0 344,949

Columbia Canal Co 0 932 3,612 4,241 5,925 7,980 8,477 7,286 8,115 9,009 2,817 0 58,394

Firebaugh Canal WD 0 593 1,021 1,837 3,361 6,719 7,276 5,437 1,203 1,467 1,701 0 30,615

San Luis Canal Co (SLCC) 0 6,087 3,055 7,003 9,052 17,166 27,435 20,445 9,203 11,511 4,607 0 115,564

Total 0 15,894 35,154 40,209 59,769 93,956 108,295 90,472 52,444 36,096 17,233 0 549,522

Refuges

Grasslands WD (via CCID & SLCC ) 219 5,292 0 88 2,781 1,937 427 1,312 15,014 17,346 6,435 866 51,717

China Island Unit (CDFG) (via CCID) 525 590 484 37 136 134 149 187 89 215 170 0 2,716

Los Banos WMA (CDFG) (via CCID & SLCC) 1,702 2,566 704 138 208 174 134 590 2,410 2,326 1,095 325 12,372

Mendota Wildlife Area (CDFG) 2,549 1,286 1,314 141 1,153 2,189 2,033 2,972 3,910 7,350 2,516 0 27,413

Salt Slough Unit (CDFG) (via CCID) 38 754 233 95 98 185 217 120 409 397 197 0 2,743

Freitas Unit (USFWS) (via CCID) 40 752 529 175 285 190 150 98 417 819 286 0 3,741

Kesterson (USFWS) (via CCID) 12 125 359 57 252 147 34 63 594 851 231 0 2,725

San Luis NWR (USFWS) (via SLCC) 2,166 0 5,000 0 3,180 7,500 600 105 1,000 0 6,431 5,901 31,883

0

Total 7,251 11,365 8,623 731 8,093 12,456 3,744 5,447 23,843 29,304 17,361 7,092 135,310

Total Deliveries 8,913 30,993 45,946 47,557 80,312 123,861 125,493 102,070 80,017 68,043 35,416 7,120 755,741

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
### §5206. Loans to individuals and groups; appropriation

The Secretary is authorized to make loans to individual Indians and to associations or corporate groups organized pursuant to this chapter. For the making of such loans and for expenses of the cooperative associations organized pursuant to this chapter there shall be appropriated, out of the Treasury of the United States, the sum of $2,000,000.

(June 26, 1936, ch. 831, §6, 49 Stat. 1968.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 506 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Administration of Funds in Revolving Fund

Funds authorized by act June 26, 1936, to be administered as a single Indian Revolving Loan Fund after Apr. 12, 1974, see section 1461 of this title.
#### § 3514.15 Where do I file my relinquishment?

File the relinquishment in the BLM office that issued the lease.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

d0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

138499(70) 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF YPSILANTI, 

TOWNSHIP OF SALEM, and CHARTER 

TOWNSHIP OF AUGUSTA, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

and 

LINCOLN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS and 

JOHN B. COLLINS, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v SC: 138499 

 COA: 281498 

Washtenaw CC: 06-000059-CK 

WASHTENAW COUNTY, WASHTENAW 

COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, 

WASHTENAW COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, 

JEFF IRWIN, LEAH GUNN, ROBERT 

BRACKENBURY, BARBARA BERGMAN, 

MARTHA KERN, MARK OUIMET, CONAN 

SMITH, and STEPHEN SOLOWCZUK, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

11, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously. 

 CAVANAGH, J., not participating due to a familial relationship with counsel of 

record.
Exhibit 32.1



                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                 Powerlinx, Inc.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Powerlinx,  Inc. he Company) on Form
10-Q for the  period  ended  June  30,  2005 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Tomlinson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Powerlinx,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by  Powerlinx,  Inc.  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Michael Tomlinson
---------------------
Michael Tomlinson
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2005
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies,  in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in his
capacity as an officer of Emmis Operating Company (the "Company"),  that, to his
knowledge:

     (1) the Annual  Report of the  Company  on Form 10-K for the  period  ended
     February 28, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the  information  contained  in such  report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  May 9, 2003


                                           /s/ JEFFREY H. SMULYAN
                                           Jeffrey H. Smulyan
                                           Chairman of the Board, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
     been  provided  to Emmis  Operating  Company  and will be retained by Emmis
     Operating  Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
     or its staff upon request.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApplications of the Lattice Boltzmann Method to Complex and Turbulent FlowsWe briefly review the method of the lattice Boltzmann equation (LBE). We show the three-dimensional LBE simulation results for a non-spherical particle in Couette flow and 16 particles in sedimentation in fluid. We compare the LBE simulation of the three-dimensional homogeneous isotropic turbulence flow in a periodic cubic box of the size 1283 with the pseudo-spectral simulation, and find that the two results agree well with each other but the LBE method is more dissipative than the pseudo-spectral method in small scales, as expected.Document ID20020070611Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLuo, Li-Shi*(Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering Hampton, VA United States)*Qi, Dewei*(University of Western Michigan Kalamazoo, MI United States)*Wang, Lian-Ping*(Delaware Univ. Newark, DE United States)*Bushnell, Dennis M.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 2002Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2002-211659ICASE-2002-19NAS 1.26:211659Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-90-52-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-97046Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020070611.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §640d–24. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §25, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1722; Pub. L. 96–40, July 30, 1979, 93 Stat. 318; Pub. L. 96–305, §10, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 933; Pub. L. 98–48, July 13, 1983, 97 Stat. 244; Pub. L. 100–666, §§2, 4(b), Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3929, 3930; Pub. L. 102–180, §2, Dec. 2, 1991, 105 Stat. 1230; Pub. L. 104–15, §1, June 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 189; Pub. L. 104–301, §10, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3652; Pub. L. 108–204, title I, §102, Mar. 2, 2004, 118 Stat. 543, which authorized appropriations for certain purposes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3835.31 When do I file an annual FLPMA document?

(a) If you must file an annual FLPMA document as required in [paragraph (d)](/on/2024-09-06/title-43/section-3835.31#p-3835.31(d)) of this section, you must file your annual FLPMA documents with BLM on or before the December 30th of the calendar year in which the assessment year ends. (For example, if the assessment year ends on September 1, 2003, you must file your annual FLPMA document no later than December 30, 2003.)

(b) If [part 3836 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-06/title-43/part-3836) requires you to perform assessment work, you must file an affidavit of assessment work. You do not need to complete assessment work in the assessment year when you located your claim. (For example, if you locate a claim on September 2, 2002, you first need to perform assessment work sometime between September 2, 2003, and September 1, 2004.)

(c) If [part 3836 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-06/title-43/part-3836) does not require you to perform assessment work, either because you located the claim during the current assessment year or because BLM has deferred assessment work, you must submit a notice of intent to hold under [§§ 3835.32](/on/2024-09-06/title-43/part-3835/section-3835.32) and [3835.33 of this part](/on/2024-09-06/title-43/part-3835/section-3835.33) as an annual FLPMA document filing. You must state in the notice of intent to hold either that BLM has deferred the assessment work requirement or that you located the claim during the current assessment year.

(d) The following table describes the circumstances under which you must file annual FLPMA documents:

| Your situation | Affidavit of assessment work required | Notice of intent to hold required |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) You have paid annual maintenance fees | No | No. |
| (2) You have an oil shale placer claim | No | Yes, by December 30 of each year you must pay the $550 oil shale fee. |
| (3) You have a small miner waiver that covers mining claims | Yes, by December 30 for each assessment year you obtained a small miner waiver | Yes, but only as described in [paragraph (c)](/on/2024-09-06/title-43/section-3835.31#p-3835.31(c)) of this section. |
| (4) You have a small miner waiver that covers mill or tunnel sites | No affidavit assessment work is required for mill or tunnel sites | Yes, notices of intent to hold are required for mill and tunnel sites. |
| (5) You have a Soldiers and Sailor's Civil Relief Act Waiver | No | No. |
| (6) You have a reclamation waiver | No | Yes. |
| (7) You have a waiver because you have been denied access | No | Yes. |
| (8) You have a deferment of assessment work | No | Yes, but only as described in [paragraph (c)](/on/2024-09-06/title-43/section-3835.31#p-3835.31(c)) of this section. |
| (9) You have applied for a mineral patent and BLM has issued a final certificate | No | No. |

[[68 FR 61064](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-61064), Oct. 24, 2003; [68 FR 74197](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-74197), Dec. 23, 2003]