alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2804.20 How does the BLM determine reasonable costs for Category 6 right-of-way activities? The BLM will consider the factors in paragraph (a) of this section and § 2804.21 of this subpart to determine reasonable costs. Submit to the BLM field office having jurisdiction over the lands covered by your application a written analysis of those factors applicable to your project unless you agree in writing to waive consideration of those factors and elect to pay actual costs (see § 2804.14(f) of this subpart). Submitting your analysis with the application will expedite its handling. The BLM may require you to submit additional information in support of your position. The BLM will continue to work on your application while you are responding to our request, as long as a deposit has been received by the BLM as provided in § 2804.19(a)(4). ( a ) *FLPMA factors.* If the BLM determines that a Category 6 cost recovery fee is appropriate for your project, the BLM will apply the following factors as set forth in Section 304(b) of FLPMA, 43 U.S.C. 1734(b), to determine the amount you owe: ( 1 ) Actual costs to the Federal Government (exclusive of management overhead costs) of processing your application and of monitoring construction, operation, maintenance, and termination of a facility authorized by the right-of-way grant;
( 2 ) Monetary value of the rights or privileges you seek;
( 3 ) BLM's ability to process an application with maximum efficiency and minimum expense, waste, and effort;
( 4 ) Costs incurred for the benefit of the general public interest rather than for the exclusive benefit of the applicant. That is, the costs for studies and data collection that have value to the Federal Government or the general public apart from processing the application;
( 5 ) Any tangible improvements, such as roads, trails, and recreation facilities, which provide significant public service and are expected in connection with constructing and operating the facility;
( 6 ) Existing agreements between the BLM and other Federal agencies for cost reimbursement associated with such application; and
( 7 ) Other factors relevant to the reasonableness of the costs (*see* § 2804.21 of this subpart).
( b ) *Fee determination.* After considering your analysis and other information, BLM will notify you in writing of what you owe. If you disagree with BLM's determination, you may appeal it under § 2801.10 of this part.
[70 FR 21058, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 81 FR 92209, Dec. 19, 2016; 89 FR 25961, Apr. 12, 2024]
EXHIBIT 21

                            IVI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                  SUBISIDIARIES



Internet Ventures, Inc.
Incorporated in California


Durangonet, Inc.
Incorporated in Colorado
         dba Frontier Internet
         dba Western Internet Connection


Internet Ventures Oregon, Inc.
Incorporated in Oregon
         dba Infostructure
         dba Medford Internet
         dba Klamath Falls Internet


Northcoast Internet, Inc.
Incorporated in California
         dba Northcoast Internet
         dba Tidepool Internet
         dba Tomatoweb OnLine
         dba Venturalink Internet
         dba Netfor995


Quik Communications, Inc.
Incorporated in California
         dba Quik Communications
§ 3282.8 What are the reasons BLM would not approve a revision of the participating area boundary? BLM will not approve a revision of the participating area boundary: ( a ) If the unit operator does not submit the required information;
( b ) If BLM determines that the new or additional technical information does not support a boundary revision; or
( c ) If it reduces the size of a participating area because of depletion of the resource.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 716

 725

 723

 728

 724

 722

 725

 730

 734

 734

 733

 747

 752

 742

 756

 768

 760

 761

 761

 764

 762

 757

 755

 750

 726

 725

 719

 697

 678

 676

 667

 683

 688

 690

 694

 697

 700

 704

 703

 711

 715

 717

 722

 726

 728

 731

 738

 742

 747

 750

 746

 748

 705

 692

 681

 670

 664

 645

 637

 629

 630

 619

 690

 695

 698

 702

 705

 707

 710

 714

 718

 721

 723

 728

 733

 731

 740

 746

 750

 755

 757

 757

 755

 740

 722

 709

 696

 688

 678

 660

 649

 644

 636

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 5, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 3431.0-1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to provide procedures for the sale of coal that is necessarily removed in the exercise of a right-of-way issued under Title V of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1761 *et seq.*).
#### § 3213.17 May BLM terminate my lease for reasons other than non-payment of rentals?

BLM may terminate your lease for reasons other than non-payment of rentals, after giving you 30 days written notice, if we determine that you violated the requirements of § 3200.4, including, but not limited to the nonpayment of royalties and fees under 30 CFR parts 206 and 218.
TABLE 32
 
                   UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR -   BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
 
                                        MADERA CANAL AND MILLERTON LAKE
 
Monthly Deliveries in AF                         1995
 
 
       WATER USERS     JAN    FEB    MAR    APR    MAY    JUN    JUL    AUG    SEP    OCT    NOV    DEC    TOTAL
 
 
MADERA CANAL
 
  ADOBE RANCH           0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0        0
  CHOWCHILLA W.D.       0   1135  16487  33702  27035  26726  30931  30367  12548  12482    125      0   191538
  MADERA  ID            0      0  13589  29092  35267  34370  41679  31151  25377  16294   5121      0   231940
 GRAVELLY FORD          0      0    864   2996   1828   3225   3092   2619   1750   1659   1268    390    19691
LA BRANZA WD            0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0        0
  SOQUEL WATER          0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0        0
 
 
     TOTAL              0   1135  30940  65790  64130  64321  75702  64137  39675  30435   6514    390   443169
 
 
MILLERTON LAKE
 
  COUNTY OF MADERA      1      1      1      2      2      5      7      7      6      5      3      2       42
  FRESNO CO.  WD #1     5      4      1      7      8     14     17     18     16     12      8      6      116
 
     TOTAL              6      5      2      9     10     19     24     25     22     17     11      8      158
 
 
*  Data supplied by Fresno Field Division, Contracts Administration Division
### §2906. Use of English

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as precluding the use of Federal funds to teach English to Native Americans.

(Pub. L. 101–477, title I, §107, Oct. 30, 1990, 104 Stat. 1156.)
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4575 

To clarify that the Federal Right to Try law applies to schedule I substances 

for which a phase I clinical trial has been completed and to provide 

access for eligible patients to such substances pursuant to the Federal 

Right to Try law. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2022 

Mr. BOOKER (for himself and Mr. PAUL) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify that the Federal Right to Try law applies to 

schedule I substances for which a phase I clinical trial 

has been completed and to provide access for eligible 

patients to such substances pursuant to the Federal 

Right to Try law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Right to Try Clarifica5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds as follows: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4575 IS

1 (1) The Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, 

2 Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try 

3 Act of 2017 (Public Law 115–176) was enacted in 

4 2018. 

5 (2) Section 561B of the Federal Food, Drug, 

6 and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb–0a), as added 

7 by the Act described in paragraph (1) (referred to 

8 in this section as the ‘‘Federal Right to Try law’’), 

9 does not exclude from the application of such law 

10 schedule I substances for which a phase I clinical 

11 trial has been completed. 

12 (3) Multiple schedule I drugs have progressed 

13 through phase I clinical trials and have been des14 ignated by the Food and Drug Administration as 

15 breakthrough therapies under section 506 of the 

16 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 

17 356) because of preliminary clinical evidence indi18 cating that such drugs demonstrate substantial im19 provement over existing therapies, but eligible pa20 tients have not been permitted access to these drugs 

21 pursuant to the Federal Right to Try law. 

22 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO FEDERAL RIGHT TO TRY LAW. 

23 Section 561B(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos24 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb–0a(b)) is amended by insert25 ing ‘‘any provision of the Controlled Substances Act (21 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4575 IS

1 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) that prohibits the unauthorized use, 

2 possession, distribution, dispensation, or transportation of 

3 an eligible investigational drug,’’ before ‘‘and parts’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### FARMERS’ NATIONAL BANK OF HENDRICKS, MINNESOTA, Appellant, v. HAUGER et al, Respondents.

(205 N. W. 384.)

(File No. 5595.

Opinion filed October 2, 1925.)

1. Appeal and Error — Findings—Insufficiency of Evidence to Justify 1 Finding Noit Reviewed Where Particulars Are Not Specified.

Insufficiency of evidence to justify finding cannot be reviewed where appellant fails to specify particulars wherein evidence is insufficient, as .required by Rev. Code 1919, Sec. 2546.

2. Banks and Banicing- — Findings—Appeal and Error — Judgment for Bank in Action Against It and Former Cashier fox* Moxxey Received Held Supported by Fiixdings.

In action against bank and former cashier for money had and received, court’s finding that money was loaned to cashier personally and not to bank held to support judgment for bank against plaintiff.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Deuel County; Hon. W. N. Skinner, Judge.

Action by the Farmers’ National Bank of Hendricks, Minn., against O'. C. Hauger and the Astoria State Bank. From a judgment for defendant bank and an order denying new trial, plaintiff appeals.

Judgment and order affirmed.

*Johnson & Schaefer,*of Ivanhoe, Minn., for Appellant.

/. *N. Johnson,*of Canby, Minn., for Respondent.

GATES, J.

This action was brought against defendant bank and Hauger, its former cashier, for money had and received. Trial by the court. Findings and judgment for plaintiff as against Hauger. Findings and judgment for defendant bank as against plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying new trial. The detailed facts are unnecessary to an understanding of the case. They showi a series of sordid banking transactions on the part of Hauger while cashier of respondent bank resulting in the putting of appellant’s money, together with money of respondent bank, into some North Dakota' land, the title to which was afterwards transferred to respondent.

[1] The trial court found that the money of plaintiff was loaned to Hauger as a personal transaction and not to respondent. Section 2546, Rev. Code 1919, says:

*581Note. — Reported in. 205 N. W. 384. See. Headnote (1), American Key-Numbered Digest, Appeal and Error, Key-No. 231(8), 3. C. J. Sec. 749; (2) Banks and Banking, Key-No. 229, 7 C. J. Sec. 569.

“If the party is relying upon the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict, finding or other decision, he shall specify the particulars wherein such evidence is claimed to be insufficient/''

This was not done; hence this court is powerless to review that question.

[2] The sole question before us is whether the findings support the judgment. We think without doubt that they do.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
§ 3106.82 Change of name. ( a ) A legally recognized change of name of a lessee or sublessee must be reported to the proper BLM office. The notice of name change must be submitted in writing with adequate information concerning the name change. For a corporate name change, the request must include the Secretary of State's Certificate of Name Change, along with the Articles of Incorporation, or Amendment, if available.
( b ) An entity must include with the notice of name change the required processing fee listed in the fee schedule in § 3000.120 of this chapter.
( c ) If a bond(s) has been furnished, a change of name on the bond may be made by surety consent or a rider to the original bond or by a replacement bond.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 708

 715

 715

 721

 725

 730

 726

 735

 723

 731

 718

 709

 712

 702

 696

 699

 691

 695

 695

 694

 691

 694

 699

 685

 683

 683

 681

 684

 686

 694

 680

 683

 689

 694

 699

 699

 694

 694

 696

 692

 690

 684

 674

 664

 660

 660

 664

 666

 666

 667

 669

 628

 671

 674

 674

 673

 671

 665

 666

 666

 691

 694

 698

 704

 709

 711

 710

 710

 708

 705

 702

 694

 687

 680

 676

 675

 674

 675

 677

 676

 677

 676

 678

 677

 678

 678

 675

 674

 673

 676

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
### §711d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 95–195, §6, Nov. 18, 1977, 91 Stat. 1417, which related to tribal constitution and bylaws, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3137.64 As a unit operator, what must I do to prevent or compensate for drainage? You must prevent uncompensated drainage of oil and gas from unit land by wells on land not subject to the unit agreement. Permissible means of satisfying the obligation include— ( a ) Drilling a protective well if it is economically feasible. For this subpart, *economically feasible* means producing a sufficient quantity of oil or gas from a protective well in the unit for a reasonable profit above the cost of drilling, completing and operating the protective well;
( b ) Paying compensatory royalty;
( c ) Forming other agreements, or modifying existing agreements, that allow the tracts committed to the unit agreement to share in production after the effective date of the new or modified agreement; or
( d ) BLM may require additional measures to prevent uncompensated drainage.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59703-59704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22248]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 14 and 52

[FAC 2001-25; Item V]


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Technical Amendments

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes amendments to the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation (FAR) in order to make editorial changes.

[[Page 59704]]


DATES: Effective Date: October 5, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS 
Building, Washington, DC, 20405, (202) 501-4755, for information 
pertaining to status or publication schedules. Please cite FAC 2001-25, 
Technical Amendments.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 14 and 52

    Government procurement.

    Dated: September 28, 2004.
Ralph J. De Stefano,
Acting Director, Acquisition Policy Division.

0
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR parts 14 and 52 as set forth 
below:
0
1. The authority citations for 48 CFR parts 14 and 52 are revised to 
read as follows:

    Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 
U.S.C. 2473(c).

PART 14--SEALED BIDDING

0
2. In section 14.403, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:


14.403  Recording of Bids.

* * * * *
    (c) The forms identified in paragraph (a) of this section need not 
be used by the Defense Energy Support Center for acquisitions of coal 
or petroleum products or by the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia for 
perishable subsistence items.
* * * * *

PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES


52.212-5   [Amended]

0
3. Amend section 52.212-5 in paragraph (b)(34)(ii) by removing ``(Apr 
1984)'' and adding ``(Apr 2003)'' in its place.


52.215-15  [Amended]

0
4. Amend section 52.215-15 by revising the date of the clause to read 
``(OCT 2004)''.


52.217-5  [Amended]

0
5. Amend section 52.217-5 in the introductory paragraph by removing 
``17.208(c)(1)'' and adding ``17.208(c)'' in its place.


52.219-4   [Amended]

0
6. Amend section 52.219-4 by revising the date of the clause to read 
``(OCT 2004)''; and removing ``will be will be'' from paragraph (d)(3) 
of the clause and adding ``will be'' in its place.
[FR Doc. 04-22248 Filed 10-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S
§ 3179.90 Oil storage tank vapors. ( a ) The hatch on an oil storage tank may be open only to the extent necessary to conduct production and measurement operations. All oil storage tanks, hatches, connections, and other access points must be vapor tight (*i.e.*, capable of holding pressure differential at the installed pressure-relieving or vapor-recovery device's settings). Upon discovery of an oil storage tank hatch that has been left open or unlatched, and unattended, the BLM will impose an immediate assessment of $1,000 on the operator.
( b ) Where practical and safe, gas released from an oil storage tank must be flared rather than vented. An operator may commingle vapors from multiple storage tanks to a single flare without prior approval from the BLM.
#### Joseph Leiner, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. R. Hoe & Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 3483.6 Special logical mining unit rules. ( a ) Production anywhere within the LMU, of either Federal or non-Federal recoverable coal reserves or a combination thereof, shall be applied toward satisfaction of the requirements of the rules of this part for achievement of diligent development and continued operation for the LMU.
( b ) The dates for submission of a resource recovery and protection plan and achievement of diligent development shall not be changed by any enlargement or diminution of the LMU.
Exhibit 32.1

     Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities
                    Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ELECTRONIC SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the
"Report"), I, Teong C. Lim, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 14, 2007                        /s/ Teong C. Lim
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Teong C. Lim
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 35.6 Prerequisites for issuing a complaint. ( a ) The reviewing official may issue a complaint under § 35.7 of this part only if— ( 1 ) The Department of Justice approves the issuance of a complaint in a written statement described in 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(1), and
( 2 ) In the case of allegations of liability under § 35.3(a) with respect to a claim, the reviewing official determines that, with respect to such claim or a group of related claims submitted at the same time such claim is submitted (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the amount of money, or the value of property or services, demanded or requested in violation of § 35.3(a) of this part does not exceed $150,000.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, a related group of claims submitted at the same time shall include only those claims arising from the same transaction (e.g., grant, loan, application, or contract) that are submitted simultaneously as part of a single request, demand, or submission.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the reviewing official's authority to join in a single complaint against a person claims that are unrelated or were not submitted simultaneously, regardless of the amount of money, or the value of property or services, demanded or requested.
### §123c. Advancement of tribal funds to Indian tribes; miscellaneous authorized purposes

On and after October 12, 1984, tribal funds may be advanced to Indian tribes during each fiscal year for such purposes as may be designated by the governing body of the particular tribe involved and approved by the Secretary including: expenditures for the benefit of Indians and Indian tribes; care, tuition, and other assistance to Indian children attending public and private schools (which may be paid in advance or from date of admission); purchase of land and improvements on land, title to which shall be taken in the name of the United States in trust for the tribe for which purchased; lease of lands and water rights; compensation and expenses of attorneys and other persons employed by Indian tribes under approved contracts; pay, travel, and other expenses of tribal officers, councils, committees, and employees thereof, or other tribal organizations, including mileage for use of privately owned automobiles and per diem in lieu of subsistence at rates established administratively but not to exceed those applicable to civilian employees of the Government; and relief of Indians, including cash grants.

(Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(c) [title I, §100], Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1837, 1849.)