alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

MAUNA KEA TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ANTICANCER, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-1412

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of California in No. 3:11-cv-01407-CABJMA, Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JEFFREY M. GOEHRING, Young & Thompson, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him 

on the brief was DOUGLAS V. RIGLER. 

MATT VALENTI, AntiCancer, Inc., of San Diego, California, argued for defendant-appellee. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 December 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
### **CHAPTER 9—HOSPITALIZATION OF MENTALLY ILL NATIONALS RETURNED FROM FOREIGN COUNTRIES**

Sec.
321.
Definitions.
322.
Reception of eligible persons at ports of entry or debarkation.
323.
Transfer and release to State of residence or legal domicile, or to relative.
324.
Care and treatment of eligible persons until transfer and release.
325.
Examination of persons admitted.
326.
Release of patient.
327.
Notification to committing court of discharge or conditional release.
328.
Payment for care and treatment.
329.
Availability of appropriations for transportation.
DELTA-ME NDOTA

CANAL

ILLA CANAL

CRESCENT

DITCH

CALIFORNIA

AQUEDUCT

BLAKELEY CANAL

CALIFORNIA

AQU E DU CT

COALINGA CANAL

HERNANDEZ

RESERVOIR

PANOCHE CREEK

S LI VER

C

P

R

ANO CHE

CREEK

CANTUA

CREEK

GAT OS

LOS

WARTHAN

CREEK

CREEK

CO TTON WOOD

LONE

FRESNO

SA N

JO AQUIN

DR Y

CR

MUR PHY

SL O UGH

TULE

SLOUGH

WILLOW

SLO UGH

JAMES

BYPASS

FFRR EESSNNOO CCOO

KKIINN GGSS CCOO

SSAANN BBEENNIITTOO CCOO

MM OONN TTEERR EEYY CCOO

MM AADDEERRAA CC OO 

EEDD CCOO

5

145

198

41

33

180

99 168

198

41

33

T19S R14E

T17S R11E

T20S R14E

T19S R11E

T18S R11E

T14S R11E

T22S R16E

T15S R11E

T12S R11E

T16S R11E

T13S R11E

T17S R12E

T20S R17E

T17S R17E

T18S R17E

T19S R17E

T18S R12E

T19S R15E

T21S R15E

T14S R16E

T20S R18E

T15S R16E

T22S R13E

T21S R14E

T12S R12E

T22S R14E

T18S R15E

T20S R19E

T16S R16E

T17S R15E

T20S R11E

T18S R19E

T15S R15E

T16S R15E

T19S R18E

T13S R16E

T21S R20E

T14S R15E

T21S R11E

T19S R19E

T17S R14E

T20S R20E

T20S R12E

T13S R14E T13S R15E

T18S R18E

T14S R17E

T17S R18E

T21S R12E

T14S R14E

T15S R17E

T22S R11E

T15S R18E

T14S R18E

T13S R17E

T18S R20E

T15S R19E

T21S R19E

T20S R15E

T13S R13E

T13S R18E

T12S R14E

T16S R19E

T12S R13E

T16S R20E

T13S R12E

T16S R18E

T15S R14E

T21S R17E

T15S R20E

T14S R20E

T17S R19E

T15S R13E

T12S R15E

T16S R13E

T22S R18E

T21S R16E

T19S R20E

T21S R18E

T16S R14E

T16S R17E

T13S R19E

T14S R19E

T18S R14E

T13S R20E

T22S R19E

T20S R16E

T22S R20E

T17S R20E

T14S R13E

T22S R17E

T14S R12E

T19S R16E

T12S R16E

T17S R16E

T18S R16E

T22S R15E

T15S R12E

T20S R13E

T21S R13E

T22S R12E

T16S R12E

T12S R17E

T23S R20E

T12S R18E

T19S R13E

T17S R13E

T23S R19E

T18S R13E

T23S R16E T23S R18E

T12S R19E T12S R20E

T23S R17E

T19S R12E

T23S R13E T23S R14E T23S R15E T23S R11E T23S R12E

T13S R21E

T14S R21E

T17S R21E

T15S R21E

T12S R21E

T18S R21E

T16S R21E

T22S R10E

T21S R21E

T21S R10E

T19S R21E

T22S R21E

T17S R10E

T18S R10E

T19S R10E

T23S R10E

T12S R10E

T13S R10E

T11S R11E T11S R12E T11S R13E T11S R14E T11S R15E

Westlands Water District

Contract No. 14-06-200-495A-LTR1

Exhibit A

0 5 10 20

Miles

Contractor's Service Area

District Boundary

Date: October 18, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\westlands\westlands.mxd 805-202-7

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.
### §640b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–189, §3, Dec. 15, 1971, 85 Stat. 646; Pub. L. 110–315, title IX, §946(b), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3468, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to make grants to the Navajo Nation to assist the tribe in the construction, maintenance, and operation of Diné College, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 15

- 3224

_____________

MAIDEN CREEK ASSOCIATES, L.P.;

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MAIDENCREEK TOWNSHIP,

Appellants

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION;

SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION;

ADMINISTRATOR FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION;

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

_____________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC T COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

(D.C. Civil No. 5

- 15

- cv

- 00242)

District Judge: Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel

____________

Argued: April 5, 2016

____________

Before: FISHER, RENDELL and BARRY, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

(Op inion Filed: May 19, 2016 )

____________

It appearing that counsel for appellant Maiden Creek Associates, L.P., was

incorre ctly identified as Marc B. Kaplan rather than Marc B. Kaplin on the listing of

counsel for the opinion filed on May 19. 2016 ;At the direction of the Court, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the opinion is

amended as follows:

Marc B. Kapl i n, Esq. (Argued)

Daniel R. Utain, Esq.

Kaplin, Stewart, Meloff, Reiter & Stein

910 Harvest Drive

P.O. Box 3037

Blue Bell, PA 19422

Counsel for M

aiden Creek Associates, L.P.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: May 20, 2015
#### § 3473.3 Rentals and royalties.
§ 2932.52 How do I apply for a renewal? ( a ) You must apply for renewal on the same form as for a new permit. You must include information that has changed since your application or your most recent renewal. If information about your operation or activities has not changed, you may merely state that and refer to your most recent application or renewal.
( b ) BLM will establish deadlines in your permit for submitting renewal applications.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T BRI A N D W I LLI A M S, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. G R E G O R Y D . T O T T E N , D i stri ct A tto rn e y f

o rV e n tu r aC o u n ty ; e t a l., R esp o n d en t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 56333 D. C . No . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 3 8 1 - AH M ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A . H ow a r d M a t z , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t23, 2010 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , H A W K IN S , an d T H O M A S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F orm e rC a l i f

orni as t a t e pr e tr i a l de t a i ne e B r i a nd W i l l i a m s appe a l s f r om the d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g h is 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 4 1 h ab e a s p e titio n . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n d w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED

SEP 03 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 56333 2 W illia m s c o n te n d s th a t h is r ig h t to as p e e d ytr ia l w a s v io la te d in h is un derl yi ng st at e prose cut i on , and thatthe un derl yi ng prosec ut i on w as un dert aken i n ba d f a i th orw i th ar e t a l i a t ory purpos e , s uc h tha tthe ge ne r a l rul e of abs t e nt i on s e tf orth i n Y o u n g e rv . H

a rr is , 4 0 1 U . S. 3 7 ( 1 9 7 1 ) d o e s n o tap p l y . W i l l i a ms f u rth e ra r g u e s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t c o n s id e rw h e th e rth e b a d f a ith e x c e p tio n ap p lie d . C o n tr a ry to W illia m s ’ c o n te n tio n s , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r ly concl ud ed thatW i l l i am s f ai l ed t o d em on stra t e thathi s prose cut i on w as un dert aken i n ba d f a i th, w he r e the r e c or d i s de voi d of a nye vi de nc e s ugge s t i ng ba d f a i th or s o m e o th e re x tr a o r d in ary c ir c u m s ta n c e th a t w o u ld m a k e ab s te n tio n in ap p r o p r ia te . See Mi dd les exC ou nt

y E thi cs C om m . v. G arden S tat e B ar A ss ’n , 457 U . S . 423, 435 ( 1 9 8 2 ) ; s e e al

s o Carde n v . Montana , 626 F . 2d 82, 84 ( 9th C i r . 1980) ( c onc l udi ng tha tf e de r a l i nt e rve nt i on i s appr opr i a t e “ [ o] nl yi n c a s e s of pr ove n ha r a s s m e ntor pr os e c ut i ons unde rt a ke n by s t a t e of f i c i a l s i n ba d f

a i th w i thouthope of

obt a i ni ng a val i d con vi ct i on and p erhaps i n o ther e xtra ordi naryci rc um st ance s w here irr e p a r ab le in

ju ry c a n b e s h o w n is f

e d e r a l in ju n c tiv e r e lie f

a g a in s t p e n d in g s ta te prosec ut i on s app ropri at e. ”) . T ott e n’ s r e que s tf

orj udi c i a l not i c e i s gr a nt e d. AF F I RME D.
#### Young’s Windows of America, Inc., Appellant, v. Maurice Deschler, Doing Business under the Name of Young Windows of America, Respondent.

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### §677e. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1009, §6, 68 Stat. 868, which granted to mixed-blood members of the tribe the right to organize for their common welfare, adopt a constitution and bylaws, and select representatives, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LASER
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES MARCH 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000740726
<NAME> LASER CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         584,706
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  405,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,063
<INVENTORY>                                  1,625,715
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,616,742
<PP&E>                                       2,149,585
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,913,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,984,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,004,219
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,353
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,936,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,984,333
<SALES>                                        858,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               865,434
<CGS>                                          802,838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,133,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (268,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (268,534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (268,534)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>
### §1469. Rules and regulations

The Secretary shall promulgate rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 93–262, title I, §109, Apr. 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 79.)
Document

Exhibit 10.2




[Trane Technologies Letterhead]



June 3, 2020


Mr. Michael W. Lamach
[Address Redacted]




Dear Mike:


On behalf of the entire Board, I wanted to thank you for agreeing to become the Executive Chair of the Board of Trane Technologies (“the Company”) in order to ensure a smooth transition of the Chief Executive Officer role. This role will be located in Davidson, North Carolina and becomes effective as of July 1, 2021.


The following summarizes the impact of this change on your compensation and benefits.


1.Your current base salary will remain unchanged at an annual rate of $1,410,000 (One Million and Four Hundred and Ten Thousand U.S. dollars) paid in pro-rata payments on a monthly basis.             


2.Your Annual Incentive Matrix (“AIM”) target opportunity will remain unchanged at 170% of your base salary.  The actual award that you may receive can range from 0% to 200% of the targeted amount depending upon your performance and the performance of the Company. 


3.Given the importance of succession, your expected tenure as Executive Chair, and to ensure your pension benefit will not be negatively impacted, the Company will set the interest rate used for the calculation of your benefit under the Executive Officer Supplemental Program (“EOSP”) according to the terms of the plan as of July 1, 2021. The interest rate will be equal to the average of the monthly rates for ten-year Constant Maturities for US Treasury Securities for the twelve-month period ending in June 2021, as quoted by the Federal Reserve. This protection will remain in effect until the earlier of your retirement date or July 1, 2022. 


4.All other benefits and perquisites to which you are currently eligible will remain in effect until your retirement date.


Mike, thank you for your extraordinary leadership of the Company and for ensuring a smooth transition to your successor.  To accept these terms, please sign the acceptance statement below and return it to Lynn Castrataro, Vice President, Total Rewards. If you have any questions regarding the impact on your benefits, please call Lynn at [Phone Number Redacted].  


Sincerely,


/s/ Tony White


Tony White
Board of Directors Compensation Committee Chair


cc: Marcia Avedon        
      Lynn Castrataro
















CANDIDATE ACCEPTANCE


I accept your offer of employment with Trane Technologies as Executive Chair of the Board and agree to the conditions herein and in the offer letter.     
                                                                         
  									
	  /s/ Michael W. Lamach   
		6/3/2021
	  Mr. Michael W. Lamach 
		Date
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

     Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Kevin R. Ruark, Chief Executive Officer of Family Home Health Services Inc.
(the "registrant"), have executed this certification for furnishing to the
Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the filing with the
Commission of the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005 (the "Report"). I hereby certify that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant as of and for the end of that year.


May 22, 2006                            /s/ Kevin R. Ruark
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Kevin R. Ruark
                                        Chief Executive Officer
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                       AGREEMENT DATED AS OF MAY 24, 2001


                    BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                       MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 2001-6


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A., the
Servicer in connection with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2001-6, do
hereby certify that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the
preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement, has been
made under my supervision, (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all material aspects its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                       BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President


Inv M83
### §458aaa–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458aaa–2 was editorially reclassified as section 5383 of this title.
Motion Granted ; Order filed October 13 , 20 1 1 .

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14 - 1 1 - 0 0 034 - CV NO. 14 - 1 1 - 0 0127 - CV

____________ RAHUL K. NATH, M.D. , Appellant

V. BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND TEXAS CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL , Appellee s On Appeal from the 215 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 20 06 - 10826 & 2006 - 10826 - A



### O R D E R On October 7, 2011 , appell ees in case number s 14

- 1 1

- 00 034

- CV and 14

- 1 1

- 0 0127

- CV filed a motion to consolidate two appeal s from sanction orders issued in the same litigation
. The motion to consolidate is GRANTED. We order the appeals pending under our appellate case numbers 14

- 1 1

- 00 034

- CV and 14

- 1 1

- 0 0127

- CV CONSOLIDATED. We GRANT appellees’ request for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellees’ brief in the consolidated appeals shall be due on or before November 18, 2011 . PER CURIAM
(No. 947

Claimant awarded $1,286.55.)

#### Glens Falls Insurance Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 19, 1927.*

Privilege *tax*— when *refund may he made.*There being no dispute as to the facts in this case the court enters an award in favor of claimant.

*Same*— when *refund may he made of overpayment.*Where it clearly appears that through an error claimant overpaid the amount due the State for its privilege tax an award for the overpayment will he made.

C. J. Doyle, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim filed by the Glens Falls Insurance Company for a refund of $1,286.55 privilege tax overpaid to the Department of Trade and Commerce of the State of Illinois in the year 1924. This amount was paid by claimant to the city collector of the city of Chicago and, under the provisions of the statute, should have been credited on the amount of claimant’s assessment for the year 1923, payable in 1924, but, through an error on its part, no claim for such credit was made.

The Attorney General has filed a statement, to which is attached as an exhibit a letter from the director of the Department of Trade and Commerce stating that claimant was entitled to credit on its assessment for the amount paid the city of Chicago as fire department tax, and recommending that upon due proof of such payment the claim be allowed. A letter from the city collector of Chicago, which is also made a part of the statement, shows that on August 21, 1923, *256claimant paid the city of Chicago the sum of $1,286.55 as fire insurance tax.

The Attorney General files his written consent to an award being allowed claimant in the sum of $1,286.55. It is manifest that claimant has paid a double tax to the extent of the claim filed, and we therefore allow it an award of $1,286.55.
### §2302. Payment of claims

#### (a) Authority of Secretary

The Secretary is authorized and directed to determine the portion of any unauthorized disbursement to which any individual under this chapter is entitled, and to pay to such individual the amount which the Secretary determines such individual to be entitled. Any payment under this provision shall include interest at a rate of 5 per centum per annum, simple interest, from the date on which such disbursement was made from the trust estate of the deceased Indian.

#### (b) Minimum amount for payment

No payment shall be made to a person under subsection (a) with respect to any unauthorized disbursement from the trust estate of a deceased Indian if—

(1) the total amount of unauthorized disbursements from such trust estate was less than $50; or

(2) the payment (not including interest) would be less than $10.

(Pub. L. 98–500, §3, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2317; Pub. L. 100–581, title II, §201, Nov. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2939.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–581 amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "No payment shall be made under subsection (a) with respect to any unauthorized disbursement from the trust estate of a deceased Indian if the total amount of unauthorized disbursement from such trust estate was less than $50."
Exhibit 32.2



                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                                 Powerlinx, Inc.
      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powerlinx, Inc. he Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George S. Bernardich,
III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Powerlinx, Inc.. and will be retained by Powerlinx, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: November 15, 2004                        By: /s/ Douglas Bauer
                                                       -------------
                                                       Douglas Bauer
                                                       Chief Financial Officer