alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5

5

!

Sacramento River

CCOOLLUUSSAA CC OO

T16N R1W

29

20

30

19

31 32

Arbee

Colusa

89.2 R

" Contract No. 14-06-200-1086Z-R-1

Exhibit B

King, Laura

725-202-80

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.25 0.5

Miles

Contractor's Service Area

! Point of Diversion

Date: May 19, 2005

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\king_laura\king_laura.mxd
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00247-CR

Roderick SUTTON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-0275-CR

The Honorable Charles Ramsay, Judge Presiding1

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgments of the trial court are 

MODIFIED to delete the assessment of $505.00 in attorney’s fees as costs and to reflect that the 

sentences were imposed on April 3, 2013. The judgments are AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

SIGNED March 12, 2014.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

1 The Honorable W.C. Kirkendall denied the motion to suppress in the underlying cause. The Honorable Charles 

Ramsay presided over the trial and signed the judgments.
### §603. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 9, 1946, ch. 933, §3, 60 Stat. 969, which related to correction of tribal membership roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 28, 2003


/s/ Brian McDougall
----------------------------------------
Brian McDougall, Chief Financial Officer
#### § 3175.130 Transducer testing protocol.

The BLM will approve a particular make, model, and range of differential-pressure, static-pressure, or temperature transducer for use in an EGM system only if the testing performed on the transducer met all of the standards and requirements stated in §§ 3175.131 through 3175.135.
§ 3602.23 When will BLM make refunds or allow credits? ( a ) BLM may make refunds or allow credits if— ( 1 ) When your contract expires, your total payments exceed the total value of mineral materials included in the contract;
( 2 ) BLM determines that insufficient mineral materials existed in the sales area to fulfill the terms of the contract; or
( 3 ) Materials you paid for are unavailable as a result of terminating your contract by mutual agreement under § 3602.22(b).
( b ) If your refund or credit is a result of terminating your contract by mutual agreement under § 3602.22(b), BLM will reduce the amount of the refund or credit by the amount of the administrative cost of processing the disposal action. If these administrative costs exceed your total payments, BLM will not make a refund or allow a credit.
( c ) BLM may credit to future production on the same contract, but not refund, payments that you make in lieu of production under § 3602.21(a)(3). However, if, upon expiration of the contract, the total value of payments you have made exceeds the total value of mineral materials included in your contract, BLM will refund the difference in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 500 408 456

2 511 399 470

3 506 387 460

4 520 406 480

5 523 405 477

6 508 363 467

7 501 296 404

8 528 353 427

9 537 432 490

10 551 448 516

11 491 347 415

12 497 386 438

13 511 424 472

14 530 368 461

15 564 369 452

16 526 414 488

17 565 403 499

18 553 481 512

19 534 472 496

20 516 408 463

21 535 419 468

22 522 402 459

23 582 416 474

24 570 396 450

25 613 465 514

26 640 492 527

27 606 462 510

28 508 384 451

29 519 400 461

30 521 392 446

31 494 404 454

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Victoria Canal On The Middle River

Period: January 2024 Run Date: 2/7/2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 452

 492

 570

 599

 632

 639

 644

 635

 606

 562

 565

 572

 574

 540

 481

 464

 496

 489

 473

 481

 428

 420

 427

 462

 459

 435

 474

 500

 521

 541

 566

 427

 441

 481

 572

 591

 618

 598

 612

 559

 551

 546

 552

 544

 475

 461

 444

 464

 468

 455

 429

 407

 402

 398

 433

 420

 421

 434

 473

 500

 520

 540

 436

 462

 521

 588

 618

 632

 624

 621

 586

 558

 555

 563

 561

 503

 475

 451

 481

 479

 466

 456

 419

 411

 410

 441

 437

 429

 456

 489

 510

 527

 557

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 14,241

 14,087

 13,991

 13,981

 14,004

 14,051

 14,078

 14,089

 14,104

 14,132

 14,191

 14,267

 14,344

 14,379

 14,391

 14,417

 14,471

 14,539

 14,614

 14,672

 14,708

 14,729

 14,728

 14,775

 14,832

 14,870

 14,915

 14,989

 15,068

 15,165

 15,286

 475

 470

 466

 466

 467

 468

 469

 470

 470

 471

 473

 476

 478

 479

 480

 481

 482

 485

 487

 489

 490

 491

 491

 493

 494

 496

 497

 500

 502

 506

 510

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 485.00

 484.40

 483.79

 483.57

 483.77

 483.50

 483.99

 484.04

 483.67

 483.23

 483.03

 482.69

 482.79

 483.19

 482.90

 482.54

 482.14

 481.63

 481.15

 480.55

 480.35

 479.77

 479.15

 478.55

 477.93

 477.96

 477.32

 478.07

 477.45

 476.90

 476.40

 40,918

 40,412

 39,900

 39,717

 39,883

 39,659

 40,066

 40,108

 39,800

 39,435

 39,269

 38,990

 39,072

 39,402

 39,162

 38,868

 38,541

 38,129

 37,743

 37,268

 37,110

 36,655

 36,173

 35,713

 35,239

 35,262

 34,781

 35,346

 34,878

 34,466

 34,096

STORAGE

-335

-506

-512

-183

+166

-224

+407

+42

-308

-365

-166

-279

+82

+330

-240

-294

-327

-412

-386

-475

-158

-455

-482

-460

-474

+23

-481

+565

-468

-412

-370

CHANGE

112

21

11

173

349

153

472

282

106

83

187

122

299

425

138

111

95

51

69

32

190

41

25

30

14

274

19

552

30

49

69

INFLOW

 278

 274

 267

 260

 261

 262

 264

 258

 258

 264

 268

 258

 257

 258

 258

 258

 258

 258

 263

 270

 269

 268

 267

 261

 250

 262

 261

 266

 265

 256

 254

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 3

 2

 2

 5

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 5

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 3

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2020 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/01/2021

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -7,157 4,584 8,131 0 0 63

ACRE-FEET -7,157 9,092 16,128 0 0 125

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 16,128

SPILL 0 16,128

 41,253

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 120

 23

 23

 191

 328

 153

 474

 277

 100

 85

 179

 89

 263

 405

 155

 100

 90

 56

 75

 42

 192

 51

 26

 36

 23

 257

 23

 534

 45

 47

 69

 4,531

 8,987

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM NEW MELONES PAN.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 Rodriguez consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. **

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSIEL RODRIGUEZ,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

J. KARGE, Captain; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-15482

D.C. No. 1:08-cv-00332-GSA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Gary S. Austin, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted September 13, 2010*** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Osiel Rodriguez, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging

FILED

OCT 06 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-15482

constitutional violations arising from an electronic word search of his documents

and related claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo. Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We

affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed the Fourth Amendment claim alleging

that prison officials improperly conducted electronic word searches on documents

that Rodriguez drafted on a shared word processor because inmates have no

legitimate expectation of privacy in their prison cells or possessions. See Hudson

v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 525-27 (1984). 

The district court properly dismissed the due process claims because

Rodriguez failed to allege facts showing how his placement in the Secure Housing

Unit or transfer to the Administrative Maximum facility imposed an atypical and

significant hardship on him in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life. See

Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, 223-34 (2005). Further, “inmates lack a

separate constitutional entitlement to a special prison grievance procedure.”

Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 860 (9th Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-2605

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Carlos Rodriguez, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Chester Earl Scott, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 7, 2000 Filed: February 8, 2000

___________ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Carlos Rodriguez, a federal inmate, appeals the denial of his "motion for discoveryof the character of the court." Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude his motion was properly denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 2884.23 Under what circumstances may BLM deny my application? ( a ) BLM may deny your application if: ( 1 ) The proposed use is inconsistent with the purpose for which BLM or other Federal agencies manage the lands described in your application;
( 2 ) The proposed use would not be in the public interest;
( 3 ) You are not qualified to hold a grant or TUP;
( 4 ) Issuing the grant or TUP would be inconsistent with the Act, other laws, or these or other regulations;
( 5 ) You do not have or cannot demonstrate the technical or financial capability to construct the pipeline or operate facilities within the right-of-way or TUP area; or
( 6 ) You do not comply with a deficiency notice (see § 2804.25(c)) or with any requests from the BLM for additional information needed to process the application.
( b ) If you are unable to meet any of the requirements in this section you may request an alternative from the BLM (see § 2884.30).
( c ) If BLM denies your application, you may appeal the decision under § 2881.10 of this part.
[70 FR 21078, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 81 FR 92227, Dec. 19, 2016; 89 FR 25975, Apr. 12, 2024]
Exhibit 31.1

      Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities
                              Exchange Act of 1934

                                   ----------

I, Teong C. Lim, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended March 31, 2005
of ELECTRONIC SENSOR TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company");

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.


                                           /s/ Teong C. Lim
Date: October 19, 2006                     -------------------------------------
                                           Teong C. Lim
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStatic internal performance of a nonaxisymmetric vaned thrust reverser with flow splay capabilityAn investigation was conducted in the Static Test Facility of the Langley 16-Foot Transonic Tunnel on a dual-port, nonaxisymmetric, block-and-turn type thrust reverser model with vane cascades in the reverser ports which turned the flow in the splay direction and aided in turning the flow in the reverse direction. Splaying reverser flow is a method of delaying to lower landing ground roll speeds the reingestion of hot exhaust flow into the inlets. Exhaust flow splay can also help prevent the impingement of hot exhaust gases on the empennage surfaces when the reverser is integrated into an actual airframe. The vane cascades consisted of two sets of perpendicular vanes with a variable number of turning and splay vanes. A skewed vane box was also tested which had only one set of vanes angled to provide both turning and splay. Vane cascades were designed to provide different amounts of flow splay in the top and bottom ports. Inner doors, trim tabs, and an orifice plate all provided means of varying the port area for reverser flow modulation. The outer door position was varied as a means of influencing the flow reverse angle. Nozzle pressure ratio was varied from 1.75 to approximately 6.00.Document ID19890018263Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBangert, Linda S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Leavitt, Laurence D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1989Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2933L-16552NASA-TP-2933Accession Number89N27634Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-71-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890018263.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §232. Jurisdiction of New York State over offenses committed on reservations within State

The State of New York shall have jurisdiction over offenses committed by or against Indians on Indian reservations within the State of New York to the same extent as the courts of the State have jurisdiction over offenses committed elsewhere within the State as defined by the laws of the State: Provided, That nothing contained in this section shall be construed to deprive any Indian tribe, band, or community, or members thereof,1 hunting and fishing rights as guaranteed them by agreement, treaty, or custom, nor require them to obtain State fish and game licenses for the exercise of such rights.

(July 2, 1948, ch. 809, 62 Stat. 1224.)

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by "of".
#### § 3435.3-5 Notice of public hearing.

After the lessee or lease applicant and the Secretary agree on an exchange proposal, notice of the exchange proposal shall be published in the Federal Register and in at least 1 newspaper of general circulation in each county or equivalent political subdivision where both the offered and selected lands are located. The notice shall announce that, upon request, at least 1 public hearing shall be held in a city or cities located near each tract involved. The notice shall also contain the Secretary's preliminary findings why the proposed exchange is in the public interest. Any notice of the availability of a draft environmental assessment or environmental impact statement on the exchange may be used to comply with this section.

[47 FR 33144, July 30, 1982]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

RUSSELL SCOTT SHICK, PRO SE

LINDA DIANNE SHICK,

Appellants 

v.

JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, PA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

TREVOR WINGARD, 

SUPERINTENDENT, STATE 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT 

SOMERSET, LAUREL HARRY, 

SUPERINTENDENT, STATE 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT 

CAMP HILL, MICHAEL R. CLARK, 

SUPERINTENDENT, STATE 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT 

ALBION

 Appellees 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 32 WAP 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2017, the Notice of Appeal is quashed.
----

----

|   | (1)    |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|   | (2)    |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                  Date: August 21,      2008 |   |                                                                       |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                          |   | /s/      Wilbert KnolWilbert      KnolInterim      Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

----

----
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58 QPM# AIR·ANM·030·F7 Date: December 17, 2008 1 

# Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No. FAA-200·W10• 

## till



# ~~-~-- With whom outside the FAA.has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization 

### , Person Contacted Date I Hoeing (AR) .John (Tim) Rudkin 4/23/2010 

### I ATA ,JoeWhite 4/23/2010 

### I I

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List to Verify That This isthe Correct Revision Before Use