alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §71. Future treaties with Indian tribes

No Indian nation or tribe within the territory of the United States shall be acknowledged or recognized as an independent nation, tribe, or power with whom the United States may contract by treaty; but no obligation of any treaty lawfully made and ratified with any such Indian nation or tribe prior to March 3, 1871, shall be hereby invalidated or impaired. Such treaties, and any Executive orders and Acts of Congress under which the rights of any Indian tribe to fish are secured, shall be construed to prohibit (in addition to any other prohibition) the imposition under any law of a State or political subdivision thereof of any tax on any income derived from the exercise of rights to fish secured by such treaty, Executive order, or Act of Congress if section 7873 of title 26 does not permit a like Federal tax to be imposed on such income.

(R.S. §2079; Pub. L. 100–647, title III, §3042, Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3641.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2079 derived from act Mar. 3, 1871, ch. 120, §1, 16 Stat. 566.

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–647 inserted sentence at end relating to State tax treatment of income derived by Indians from exercise of fishing rights secured by treaties, Executive orders, or Acts of Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–647 applicable to all periods beginning before, on, or after Nov. 10, 1988, with no inference created as to existence or nonexistence or scope of any income tax exemption derived from fishing rights secured as of Mar. 17, 1988, by any treaty, law, or Executive order, see section 3044 of Pub. L. 100–647, set out as an Effective Date note under section 7873 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

#### Short Title of 2022 Amendment

Pub. L. 117–317, §1, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4419, provided that: "This Act [repealing sections 72, 127 to 130, 137, 138, 273, 283, 285, and 302 of this title] may be cited as the 'Repealing Existing Substandard Provisions Encouraging Conciliation with Tribes Act' or the 'RESPECT Act'."

#### Short Title of 2000 Amendment

Pub. L. 106–179, §1, Mar. 14, 2000, 114 Stat. 46, provided that: "This Act [amending sections 81 and 476 of this title] may be cited as the 'Indian Tribal Economic Development and Contract Encouragement Act of 2000'."
### §1711. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 95–395, §12, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 817, which related to limitation of actions and jurisdiction, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §1073. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–244, §2, Mar. 9, 1972, 86 Stat. 57, which exempted distributed funds from Federal and State income taxes and provided for payments to minors and persons under legal disabilities, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7156

JAMES A. GILES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DOCTOR ALLAN WALLS; DOCTOR EILLEN DELANEY; DOCTOR ROBERT 

POILETMAN; MRS. AMY ENLOE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(0:10-cv-00959-DCN)

Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Giles, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, 

MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South 

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James A. Giles appeals the district court’s orders 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and the court’s 

order denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Giles v. Walls, No. 0:10-cv-00959-DCN 

(D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2011; Aug. 17, 2011; Aug. 24, 2011). We deny 

Giles’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 3207.17 How is the term of my lease affected by commitment to a unit? ( a ) If your lease is committed to a unit agreement and its term would expire before the unit term would, BLM may extend your lease to match the term of the unit. We will do this if unit development has been diligently pursued while your lease is committed to the unit.
( b ) To extend the term of a lease committed to a unit, the unit operator must send BLM a request for lease extension at least 60 days before the lease expires showing that unit development has been diligently pursued. BLM may require additional information.
( c ) Within 30 days after receiving your complete extension request, BLM will notify the unit operator whether we approve.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

CATHERINE NADOLSKY

v.

UPMC ALTOONA REGIONAL HEALTH 

SYSTEM (WORKERS' COMPENSATION 

APPEAL BOARD)

PETITION OF: CATHERINE NADOLSKY

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 143 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
### PART IV—INCENTIVES FOR EDUCATION ZONES

Sec.
[1397E.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13404(c)(1), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2138, struck out item 1397E "Credit to holders of qualified zone academy bonds".

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–34, title II, §226(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 820, added part IV heading and item 1397E. Former part IV, consisting of section 1397D, redesignated V.
#### Vassie *v.*Central of Georgia Railway Company.

Fish, C. J.

1. There is no absolute and invariable rule which limits to 'one grant the power of the. judge of the superior court to grant a new trial upon the grounds that the verdict is contrary to law, contrary to evidence, arid without evidence to support it, and decidedly and strongly against the weight of the evidence.

2. After one such grant, a subsequent grant on account of alleged conflict between the evidence and the verdict will be closely examined to see that the discretion pf the court below has been justly and wisely exercised, in view of the peculiar issues and facts of each ease, and having due regard to the general consideration of the fitness of juries to ascertain facts and of the necessity that there must be some end to litigation. *Taylor*v. *Central Railroad*& *Banking Co.,*79 *Ga.*330 (5 S. E. 114) ; *Peavy*v. *Georgia Railroad*& *Banking Co.,*81 *Ga.*485, 488 (8 S. E. 70, 12 Am. St. R. 334) ; *Stewart*v. *Central of Georgia Ry. Co.,*3 *Ga. App.*397 (60 S. E. 1).

*9August 10, 1910.

Damages. Before *Judge*Charlton. Chatham superior court. July 17, 1909. (

*Twiggs & Gazan,*for plaintiff.

*Lawton & Gunningham,*for defendant.

3. Under the evidence in the present case, there was no abuse of discretion in granting a second new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*
#### § 3173.26 Relationship of off-lease measurement approval to royalty-free use of production.

Approval of off-lease measurement does not constitute approval of off-lease royalty-free use of production as fuel in facilities located at an FMP approved under the off-lease measurement approval.
1The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________

No. 98-2339

________________

Dave Garey, also known as Freddy

Mertz,

Appellant,

v.

Bonneville Internationa l

Corporation, a Utah Corporation;

Ron Carter; Deseret Mutual Benefit

Administrators, a Uta h

Corporation,

Appellees.

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the

Western District of Missouri.

[UNPUBLISHED]

________________

Submitted: March 18, 1999

 Filed: March 24, 1999

________________

Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. 

________________

PER CURIAM.

Dave Garey appeals from the district court's1 dismissal of his action with

prejudice, and the assessment of costs, after Garey failed to appear at his court-
2

ordered deposition. After careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. We have considered and

now deny Garey's motions for sanctions, to present oral argument, and for permission

to present "evidentiary testimony" by telephone.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
§ 3593.1 Core or test hole cores, samples, cuttings. ( a ) The operator/lessee shall submit promptly to the authorized officer a signed copy of records of all core or test holes made on the lands covered by the lease, license or permit. The records shall be in a form that will allow the position and direction of the holes to be located on a map. The records shall include a log of all strata penetrated and conditions encountered, such as water, gas or unusual conditions. Copies of analysis of all samples shall be transmitted to the authorized officer as soon as obtained or as requested by the authorized officer. The operator/lessee shall furnish the authorized officer a detailed lithologic log of each drill hole and all other in-hole surveys or other logs produced. The core from test holes shall be retained by the operator/lessee for 1 year or such other period as may be directed by the authorized officer, and shall be available for inspection by the authorized officer. The authorized officer may cut such cores and receive samples as appropriate. Upon the request of the authorized officer, the operator/lessee shall furnish samples of strata, drill cuttings and mill products.
( b ) Surface drill holes for development or holes for prospecting shall be abandoned to the satisfaction of the authorized officer by cementing and/or casing or by other methods approved in advance by the authorized officer and in a manner to protect the surface and not endanger any present or future underground operation or any deposit of oil, gas, other mineral substances or aquifer.
( c ) Logs and analyses of development holes shall not be required unless specifically requested by the authorized officer. Drill holes may be converted to surveillance wells for the purpose of determining the effect of subsequent operations upon the quantity, quality of pressure of ground water or mine gases. Such conversion may be required by the authorized officer or requested by the operator/lessee and approved by the authorized officer. Prior to the termination of the lease, license or permit term, all surveillance wells shall be reclaimed unless the surface owner assumes responsibility for reclamation of such surveillance wells. The transfer of liability for reclamation shall be approved in writing by the authorized officer.
( d ) When drilling on lands with potential for encountering high pressure oil, gas or geothermal formations, drilling equipment shall be equipped with blowout control devices acceptable to the authorized officer.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,332.09

 2,331.62

 2,331.20

 2,330.80

 2,330.34

 2,329.89

 2,329.45

 2,328.98

 2,328.53

 2,328.05

 2,327.58

 2,327.16

 2,326.71

 2,326.26

 2,325.90

 2,325.64

 2,325.37

 2,325.09

 2,324.72

 2,324.30

 2,323.87

 2,323.42

 2,323.04

 2,322.60

 2,322.16

 2,321.75

 2,321.61

 2,321.57

 2,321.48

 2,321.40

 2,321.34

 1,874.4

 1,867.9

 1,862.1

 1,856.6

 1,850.2

 1,844.1

 1,838.0

 1,831.6

 1,825.5

 1,818.9

 1,812.6

 1,806.9

 1,800.8

 1,794.7

 1,789.8

 1,786.3

 1,782.7

 1,779.0

 1,774.0

 1,768.4

 1,762.6

 1,756.6

 1,751.6

 1,745.7

 1,739.9

 1,734.5

 1,732.6

 1,732.1

 1,730.9

 1,729.8

 1,729.1

STORAGE

-6.8

-6.5

-5.8

-5.5

-6.3

-6.2

-6.0

-6.4

-6.1

-6.5

-6.4

-5.7

-6.1

-6.1

-4.9

-3.5

-3.6

-3.8

-5.0

-5.6

-5.7

-6.0

-5.1

-5.8

-5.8

-5.4

-1.8

-0.5

-1.2

-1.1

-0.8

CHANGE

7

126

231

163

184

155

172

5

108

45

166

63

246

185

6

92

207

51

564

226

289

8

62

270

293

-69

-566

207

-257

-117

-87

INFLOW

 3,387

 3,344

 3,098

 2,899

 3,304

 3,198

 3,140

 3,175

 3,136

 3,262

 3,342

 2,896

 3,262

 3,196

 2,410

 1,823

 1,997

 1,913

 3,021

 3,005

 3,124

 2,984

 2,580

 3,175

 3,205

 2,603

 327

 14

 14

 14

 14

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 8

 0

 0

 0

 9

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 24

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 428

 285

 347

 240

OUTLET

 53

 61

 61

 45

 69

 73

 68

 72

 64

 72

 40

 40

 52

 44

 44

 32

 40

 36

 43

 55

 39

 47

 35

 39

 31

 62

 39

 31

 43

 54

 58

C.F.S.

 .13

 .15

 .15

 .11

 .17

 .18

 .17

 .18

 .16

 .18

 .10

 .10

 .13

 .11

 .11

 .08

 .10

 .09

 .11

 .14

 .10

 .12

 .09

 .10

 .08

 .16

 .10

 .08

 .11

 .14

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -152.0 3,035 76,862 0 1,341 1,542 3.88 .00

ACRE-FEET -152,000 6,020 152,456 0 2,660 3,059

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 152,456

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2,660

 155,116

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2003 1.69

 1,881.2

(1) (1)
§ 3742.3-5 Mailing of copies of published notice. Within fifteen days after the date of first publication, the person requesting such publication shall: ( a ) Cause a copy of such notice to be personally delivered to or to be mailed by registered mail addressed to each person in possession or engaged in the working of the land whose name and address is shown by the affidavit or affidavits of examination of the land filed, as set forth in § 3742.3-1.
( b ) Cause a copy of such notice to be personally delivered to or to be mailed by registered mail addressed to each person who may, on or before the date of first publication, have filed for record, as to any lands described in the published notice, a Request for Notices, as provided in subsection (d) of section 7 of the Act (see § 3744.1);
( c ) Cause a copy of such notice to be mailed by registered mail to each person whose name and address is set forth in the certificate required to be filed under § 3742.3-1; and
( d ) File in the office where the Request for Publication was filed an affidavit that copies have been delivered or mailed as herein specified. Notwithstanding the requirements in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this section, not more than one copy of such notice need be delivered or mailed to the same person.
#### § 3738.2 Restoration of surface condition.

If the locator fails or refuses to restore the surface, appropriate action will be taken against him and his surety, including the appropriation of any money deposited on personal bonds, to be used for the purpose of restoring the surface of the claim involved. Any moneys on deposit or received from surety in excess of the amount needed for the restoration of the surface of the particular claim shall be refunded.

[35 FR 9738, June 13, 1970]
§ 3275.12 What environmental and safety requirements apply to facility operations? ( a ) You must perform all utilization facility operations in a manner that: ( 1 ) Protects the quality of surface and subsurface waters, air, and other natural resources, including wildlife, soil, vegetation, and natural history;
( 2 ) Prevents unnecessary or undue degradation of the lands;
( 3 ) Protects the quality of cultural, scenic, and recreational resources;
( 4 ) Accommodates other land uses as much as possible;
( 5 ) Minimizes noise;
( 6 ) Prevents injury; and
( 7 ) Prevents damage to property.
( b ) You must monitor facility operations to identify and address local environmental resources and concerns associated with your facility or lease operations.
( c ) You must remove or, with BLM approval, properly store all equipment and materials not in use.
( d ) You must properly abandon the facility and reclaim any disturbed surface to standards approved or prescribed by us, when the land is no longer needed for facility construction or operation.
( e ) When we require, you must submit a contingency plan describing procedures to protect public health and safety, property, and the environment.
( f ) You must comply with the requirements of § 3200.4.
Document

Exhibit 10.4

AMENDMENT 2021-1
NORDSTROM DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
(2019 Restatement)


The Nordstrom Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, pursuant to Article X, to change references from “Leadership Benefits” to “Nordstrom Benefits” throughout the document, clarify provisions related to deferral of bonus compensation and base compensation, and to delete the exhibit for participating subsidiaries.  Unless otherwise specified below, these amendments will be effective as of January 1, 2022: 


1.    Effective as of the date of this Amendment 2021-1, the term “Leadership Benefits” is hereby replaced in the following sections with “Nordstrom Benefits:”


Sections 2.3(a), 3.1(a), 4.4(b), 4.6, 6.1(c), 6.4(b), 6.4(c), 6.6(a), 7.1, 8.4, 9.1, 11.4 and the Index of Defined Terms.  


2.    Section 3.1(b)(2) “Bonus Compensation” is replaced in its entirety with the following:  
3.1(b)(2)    Bonus Compensation.  A Participant’s Bonus Compensation paid under the Company’s broad-based bonus plan (the “Company Bonus Plan” and any successor plan), whether paid in cash or stock and whether paid annually, quarterly or on any other basis.  A Participant’s Bonus Compensation shall not include any other bonuses paid by the Company, including, but not limited to, individual or segment bonuses.  
  
3.    Section 3.2(a) is replaced in its entirety with the following:  


(a)    Base Compensation.  All or a portion of the Participant’s Base Compensation expressed as a percentage of up to eighty percent (80%) of the Eligible Employee’s Base Compensation.  The deferral percentage applied to a Participant’s Base Compensation each pay period shall be based on a Participant’s annualized Base Compensation and shall be determined in accordance with the policies and procedures adopted by the Plan Administrator.  


4.    Effective as of the date of this Amendment 2021-1, Exhibit A (Participating Subsidiaries) is hereby deleted in its entirety.  


*    *    *    *    *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to proper authority, this Amendment 2021-1 has been executed on behalf of the Company this 29th day of April, 2021.


                    NORDSTROM, INC.






                    By:                            
                        Christine Deputy
                    Title:    Chief Human Resources Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22417]



[[Page 59942]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel ``Review of an Unsolicited R24 
Application''.
    Date: October 26, 2004.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Marc L. Lesnick, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Room 3264, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-6636, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f22237b7c792b0f21262761282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96fbfaa2a5a0f2d6f8fffeb8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 29, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-22417 Filed 10-5-04- 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>