alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3279.10 When may I request a variance from BLM requirements pertaining to utilization operations? ( a ) You may file a request with BLM for a variance for your approved utilization operations from the requirements of § 3200.4. Your request must include enough information to explain: ( 1 ) Why you cannot comply with the requirements; and
( 2 ) Why you need the variance to operate your facility, conserve natural resources, or protect public health and safety, property, or the environment.
( b ) We may approve your request orally or in writing. If we give you oral approval, we will follow up with written confirmation.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4676 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4676

   To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to classify broadband as 
                      telecommunications service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2022

   Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Booker, Ms. 
 Klobuchar, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Merkley, Ms. Warren, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 
Sanders, Mr. Lujan, Mr. Schatz, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Cardin, 
 Mrs. Shaheen, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Hassan, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. 
Padilla, Mr. Heinrich, Ms. Smith, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Kaine, Mr. King, 
 Mr. Durbin, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Reed, and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to classify broadband as 
                      telecommunications service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Net Neutrality and Broadband Justice 
Act of 2022''.

SEC. 2. CLASSIFICATION OF BROADBAND AS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE.

    Section 3(53) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 153(53)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``means the offering'' and inserting the 
        following: ``--
                    ``(A) means the offering''; and
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting the 
        following: ``; and
                    ``(B) includes the offering of broadband internet 
                access service, as defined in section 801, for a fee 
                directly to the public, or to such classes of users as 
                to be effectively available directly to the public, 
                regardless of the facilities used.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the Issuer).



I, Keith S. Hynes, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer
certify that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: February 15, 2006



/S/ KEITH S. HYNESName: Keith S. Hynes
§ 3461.1 Underground mining exemption from criteria. ( a ) Federal lands with coal deposits that would be mined by underground mining methods shall not be assessed as unsuitable where there would be no surface coal mining operations, as defined in § 3400.0-5 of this title, on any lease, if issued.
( b ) Where underground mining will include surface operations and surface impacts on Federal lands to which a criterion applies, the lands shall be assessed as unsuitable unless the surface management agency finds that a relevant exception or exemption applies.
[44 FR 42638, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33149, July 30, 1982. Redesignated at 52 FR 46473, Dec. 8, 1987]
§ 3137.60 As the unit operator, what are my obligations? As the unit operator— ( a ) You must comply with the terms and conditions of the unit agreement, Federal laws and regulations, lease terms and stipulations, and BLM notices and orders;
( b ) You must provide to BLM evidence of acceptable bonding. Acceptable bonding means a bond in an amount which is no less than the sum of the individual Federal bonding requirements for each of the NPR-A leases committed to the unit. You may also meet this requirement if you add the unit operator as a principal to lease bonds to reach the required amount; and
( c ) The bond must be payable to the Secretary of the Interior.
----

Exhibit 99.3 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Provident Energy Trust (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas W. Buchanan, Chief Executive Officer ofProvident Energy Ltd., who performs the same function for the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

- The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and  
- The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results  of operations of the Company. 

By: /s/ Thomas W. Buchanan                                              Thomas W. Buchanan       Chief Executive Officer of Provident Energy Ltd.  

April 26, 2004 

----
In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 2 4
- 00 230
- CR

__________________ ALBERT WENDELL SELLS , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. F19
- 33290
- 0

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On June 28, 2024, Albert Wendell S e lls filed a notice of appeal from a sentence pronounced on August 4, 2022 , in Trial Cause Number F19

- 3329 0

- 0 . This is the second time Sells filed a notice of appeal regarding this case. On February 1, 2023, we dismissed Sells’ appeal because the notice of appeal had not been timely filed. See Sells v. State , No. 09

- 22

- 00408

- CR, 2023 WL 1431166, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Beaumont Feb. 1, 2023, no pet.) (mem

. op., not designated for publication).When a defendant appeals from a conviction in a criminal case, the time to file a notice of appeal runs from the date sentence is imposed or suspended in open
court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). The notice of appeal must be filed “within 90 days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial.” Id

. 26.2(a)(2). Sells filed a notice of appeal on June 28 , 202 4 , more than 90 days after the date the trial court imposed the sentence. On July 3, 2024, the Clerk of the Court notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless a party established that the notice of appeal was timely filed. No party filed a response. Furth ermore, the Court ha s received nothing from the Court of Criminal Appeals stating that the Court of Criminal Appeals has granted
an out

- of

- time appeal

. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43. 2 (f). APPEAL DISMISSED. PER CURIAM

Submitted on July 30, 2024 Opinion Delivered July 31, 2024 Do Not Publish Before Johnson, Wright and Chambers, JJ.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4496 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 to modify the 

authorization of appropriations for the Las Vegas Wash program, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 23, 2022 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself and Ms. ROSEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 

to modify the authorization of appropriations for the 

Las Vegas Wash program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Las Vegas Wash Pro5 gram Extension Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE 

7 LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM. 

8 Section 529(b)(3) of the Water Resources Develop9 ment Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2658; 119 Stat. 2255; 125 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4496 IS

1 Stat. 865) is amended by striking ‘‘$30,000,000’’ and in2 serting ‘‘$55,000,000’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
T11N R3E

T10N R4E

T10N R3E

T11N R4E

Karnak

Joes Landing

22.5 R

17.0 R

16.62 R

0

7

28

26

35 36

25

33

18

27

34

6

21 22 23 24

13

12

30

31

19

29

24

32

19

20

1

8

Y O 5 Y O LL OO CC OO

SSUUTTTTEE RR CCOO

SSAACCRRAA MMEE NNTTOO CCOO

Contract No. 14-06-200-2149A-R-1

Exhibit B

Sacramento River Ranch, LLC

725-202-120

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 18, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\sacramento_river_ranch_llc\sacramento_river_ranch_llc.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ ROBERT F. MANGANO     |                                  |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Name:      | Robert F. Mangano                     |   |
| Title:                         | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| Date:                          | March 23, 2011                        |   |
|                                |                                  |   |

| /s/ JOSEPH M. REARDON               |                                                       |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:      | Joseph M. Reardon                                          |   |
| Title:                    | Senior Vice President and Treasurer    |   |
| Date:                          | March 23, 2011                                             |   |

----
### **Subchapter G—Exemptions, Registration, Etc.**

Sec.
4221.
Certain tax-free sales.
4222.
Registration.
4223.
Special rules relating to further manufacture.
[4224.
Repealed.]
4225.
Exemption of articles manufactured or produced by Indians.
[4226.
Repealed.]
4227.
Cross reference.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, §1899A(74), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2963, substituted "reference" for "references" in item 4227.

**1983**—Pub. L. 97–473, title II, §202(b)(9), Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2610, purported to substitute "Cross references" for "Cross reference" in item 4227. No change in text was required because item 4227 as originally enacted by section 119(a) of Pub. L. 85–859 already read "Cross references".

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1904(b)(3), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1815, struck out item 4226 "Floor stocks taxes".

**1965**—Pub. L. 89–44, title I, §101(b)(5), June 21, 1965, 79 Stat. 136, struck out item 4224 "Exemption for articles taxable as jewelry."

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–859, title I, §119(a), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1282, added subchapter heading and section analysis.
Presidential Documents

58035

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 188

Wednesday, September 29, 2004

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2004–49 of September 20, 2004

Determination and Waiver of Application of Section 908(a)(1) 

of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act 

of 2000 with Respect to Libya 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of 

Agriculture[, and] the Secretary of Commerce 

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of 

the United States, including section 908(a)(3) of the Trade Sanctions Reform 

and Export Enhancement Act of 2000, title IX, Public Law 106–387 (TSRA), 

I hereby determine that waiver of the application of section 908(a)(1) of 

TSRA with respect to Libya is in the national security interest of the United 

States and hereby waive the application of that section with respect to 

Libya. 

The Secretary of State is hereby authorized and directed to report this 

determination and waiver to the Congress and to arrange for its publication 

in the Federal Register

W.

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 20, 2004. 

[FR Doc. 04–21954

Filed 9–28–04; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P
[GRAPHIC OMITTED] Acergy

                     Acergy S.A. Annual Report and Notice of
                             Annual General Meeting

London, England - February 25, 2008 - Acergy S.A. (NASDAQ NM: ACGY; Oslo Stock
Exchange: ACY) today announced the publication of the Annual Report 2007 and
Notice of Annual General Meeting for 2008.

Copies of the Annual Report 2007 are available on our website
http://www.acergy-group.com/public/FinancialReports.

The Annual General Meeting of shareholders will be held on Friday May 23, 2008
at 3:00 p.m. local time at the offices of Services Generaux de Gestion S.A., 23,
avenue Monterey, L-2086 Luxembourg. All shareholders of record as of Monday
March 31, 2008 will be entitled to vote at the meeting.

If the Annual General Meeting of shareholders approve the proposed payment of
dividend of USD 0.21 per Common Share, the shareholders who will be entitled to
such dividend will be those who are shareholders of record as of Wednesday May
28, 2008. In such case the first trading date ex-dividend will be Thursday May
29, 2008 and the date of payment of dividend will be Thursday June 12, 2008.

********************************************************************************
Acergy S.A. is a seabed-to-surface engineering and construction contractor for
the offshore oil and gas industry worldwide. We plan, design and deliver
complex, integrated projects in harsh and challenging environments. We operate
internationally as one group - globally aware and locally sensitive, sharing our
expertise and experience to create innovative solutions. We are more than
solution providers, we are solution partners - ready to make long-term
investments in our people, assets, know-how and relationships in support of our
clients.
********************************************************************************

Contacts:
Karen Menzel
Acergy S.A.
+44 (0)20 7290 1744
karen.menzel@acergy-group.com

www.acergy-group.com

If you no longer wish to receive our press releases please contact:
kelly.good@acergy-group.com
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-31141

Summary Calendar

 

HOWARD NOLAN CHISHOLM, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on behalf of 

Overton Brooks Medical Center

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-1421

- - - - - - - - - -

April 22, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Howard N. Chisholm, Jr., appeals the dismissal of his suit

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2401(b). Chisholm contends that the statute of limitations did

not bar his suit because his administrative tort claim was filed

within two years of the time he became aware of the factual

predicate for a possible medical malpractice claim. We have
No. 96-31141

- 2 -

reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and AFFIRM the

district court’s dismissal for essentially the same reasons

adopted by the district court. Chisholm v. United States, No.

96-CV-1421 (W.D. La. Oct. 22, 1996).

AFFIRMED.
#### Green Point Savings Bank, Respondent, v. 393 Stone Ave. Corporation et al., Defendants, and Bernard Chess, Defendant-Appellant. (Action No. 4.)

Present—Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
§ 35.13 Parties to the hearing. ( a ) The parties to the hearing shall be the defendant and the Department of the Interior.
( b ) Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3730(c)(5), a private plaintiff under the False Claims Act may participate in these proceedings to the extent authorized by the provisions of that Act.
### **Subchapter A—Estates of Citizens or Residents**

Part
I.
Tax imposed.
II.
Credits against tax.
III.
Gross estate.
IV.
Taxable estate.
§ 3281.9 How does a unit operator provide documentation to BLM of lease and tract commitment status? ( a ) The unit operator must provide documentation to BLM of the commitment status of each lease and tract in the designated unit area. The documentation must include a joinder or other comparable document signed by the lessee or mineral rights owner, or evidence that an opportunity to join was offered and no response was received (see § 3281.8).
( b ) A majority interest of owners of any single Federal lease has authority to commit the lease to a unit agreement.
#### § 3452.2-2 Cancellation procedure.

The lessee shall be given notice of any default, breach or cause of forefeiture and be afforded 30 days to correct the default, to request an extension of time in which to correct the default, or to submit evidence showing why the lease should not be cancelled. The Governor of the affected State(s) shall be given reasonable notice of action taken by the Department of the Interior to initiate cancellation of the lease.

[44 FR 42635, July 19, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 37656, Aug. 19, 1983]
§ 3505.55 What are my obligations to BLM under an approved prospecting permit? You must: ( a ) Pay your annual rental in a timely fashion. See §§ 3504.15 and 3504.16 of this part;
( b ) Comply with all permit terms and stipulations the surface management agency attached to the permit;
( c ) Conduct only those exploration activities approved as part of your existing exploration plan; and
( d ) Discontinue activities following expiration of the initial term unless and until BLM extends your permit.
§ 2883.14 What happens to my grant or TUP if I die? ( a ) If a grant or TUP holder dies, any inheritable interest in the grant or TUP will be distributed under State law.
( b ) If the distributee of a grant or TUP is not qualified to hold a grant or TUP under § 2883.10 of this subpart, BLM will recognize the distributee as grant or TUP holder and allow the distributee to hold its interest in the grant or TUP for up to two years. During that period, the distributee must either become qualified or divest itself of the interest.
[70 FR 21058, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 89 FR 25973, Apr. 12, 2024]
### §4199. Penalty for failure to give bond and for embezzlement

Every consular officer who accepts any appointment to any office of trust mentioned in section 4198 of this title without first having complied with the provisions thereof by due execution of a bond as therein required, or who shall willfully fail or neglect to account for, pay over, and deliver any money, property, or effects so received to any person lawfully entitled thereto, after having been requested by the latter, his representative or agent so to do, shall be deemed guilty of embezzlement and shall be punishable by imprisonment for not more than five years and by a fine of not more than $5,000.

(June 30, 1902, ch. 1331, §2, 32 Stat. 547.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 1179 of this title, and prior thereto to section 79 of this title.
§ 3603.22 What fees must I pay to cover the cost of reclamation of community pits and common use areas? ( a ) You must pay a reclamation fee based on the amount of mineral materials you extract from the community pit or common use area, unless you make an alternative arrangement under paragraph (b) of this section. The reclamation fee you pay is a proportionate share of the total estimated cost of reclamation, determined by using the ratio of the material that you extract under your permit or contract to the total volume of the material BLM estimates will be extracted from the site.
( b ) BLM may, at our discretion, allow purchasers and permittees to perform interim or final reclamation, where needed, in lieu of paying reclamation charges. If BLM allows you to perform reclamation in lieu of paying a fee, we may also require you to post a bond under § 3602.14.
#### Thomas S. Parker, Appellant, *v.*The City of Cohoes, Respondent.

(Argued June 10, 1878;

decided June 21, 1878.)

Reported below, 10 Hun, 531.

*Rufus W. Peckham*for appellant.

*Matthew Hale*for respondent. ,

*611Agree to affirm order, and for judgment absolute against plaintiff on stipulation, on opinion of General Term.

All concur.

Order affirmed, and judgment accordingly.
#### § 3465.0-1 Purpose.

This subpart establishes rules for the management and protection of the surface of leased Federal lands when coal deposits are developed.