alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4709 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to amend regulations to allow for 

certain packers to have an interest in market agencies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2022 

Mr. LUJA ́N (for himself and Ms. ERNST) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to amend regulations 

to allow for certain packers to have an interest in market 

agencies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Local Meat 

5 Processing Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALLOWED INTEREST OF CERTAIN PACKERS IN MAR7 KET AGENCIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

9 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4709 IS

1 shall revise section 201.67 of title 9, Code of Federal Reg2 ulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act), 

3 to exempt the packers described in subsection (b) from 

4 the prohibition described in that section. 

5 (b) PACKERS DESCRIBED.—A packer referred to in 

6 subsection (a) is a packer that— 

7 (1) with respect to cattle or sheep, has a cumu8 lative slaughter capacity of less than— 

9 (A) 2,000 animals per day; or 

10 (B) 700,000 animals per year; and 

11 (2) with respect to hogs, has a cumulative 

12 slaughter capacity of less than— 

13 (A) 10,000 animals per day; or 

14 (B) 3,000,000 animals per year. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Tuesday 5th 

 December, 1995. 

George Rodney Jennings, Jr., Appellant, 

 against Record No. 0424-93-4 

 Circuit Court No. CR8063 

Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee. 

Upon Rehearing En Banc 

 Before Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, 

 Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton 

Paul A. Maslakowski (Campbell & Maslakowski, on 

brief), for appellant. 

Margaret Ann B. Walker, Assistant Attorney General 

(James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on 

brief), for appellee. 

 

By opinion dated March 14, 1995, a majority of a panel of 

this Court affirmed George Rodney Jennings, Jr.'s convictions of 

abduction with the intent to defile and forcible sodomy. Jennings v. 

Commonwealth, 20 Va. App. 9, 454 S.E.2d 752 (1995). On Jennings' 

motion, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted rehearing 

en banc. Upon such rehearing, the stay of this Court's March 14, 1995 

mandate is lifted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for 

those reasons set forth in the panel's majority opinion. 

Judge Benton would reverse the judgment of the trial court 

for those reasons set forth in the panel's dissenting opinion. See

id. at 19-21, 454 S.E.2d at 757 (Barrow, J., dissenting). 
It is ordered that the trial court allow counsel for the 

appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered the 

appellant on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to 

counsel's costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. 

The Commonwealth shall recover of the appellant the amount 

paid court-appointed counsel to represent him in this proceeding, 

counsel's costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses, and the 

fees and costs to be assessed by the clerk of this Court and the clerk 

of the trial court. 

This order shall be published and certified to the trial 

court. 

 A Copy, 

 Teste: 

 Richard R. James, Clerk 

 By: 

 Deputy Clerk
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CEDRIC LAVON MICKENS, JR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-904

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 12, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; Mark F. Carpanini, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Megan Olson, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

1st Constitution Bancorp: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statement (No. 333-98177) filed onForm S-8, of our report dated February 6, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of 1st ConstitutionBancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears inthe December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of 1st Constitution Bancorp. 

 

/s/ **KPMG LLP**

 

Short Hills, New Jersey 

March 24, 2005
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Jed Beck, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  August 15, 2011 /s/ Jed Beck Jed Beck President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4803 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4803

  To repeal the authority under the National Labor Relations Act for 
 States to enact laws prohibiting agreements requiring membership in a 
    labor organization as a condition of employment, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 8, 2022

Ms. Warren (for herself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. Baldwin, 
    Mr. Brown, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Booker, Mr. Markey, Mr. Sanders, Ms. 
   Klobuchar, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Merkley, Ms. Smith, Ms. Stabenow, Ms. 
     Hassan, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Lujan, and Mr. Padilla) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the authority under the National Labor Relations Act for 
 States to enact laws prohibiting agreements requiring membership in a 
    labor organization as a condition of employment, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nationwide Right To Unionize Act''.

SEC. 2. PREEMPTING STATE RIGHT-TO-WORK LAWS.

    Subsection (b) of section 14 of the National Labor Relations Act 
(29 U.S.C. 164) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                          372053
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                503901
<PP&E>                                            5000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2363563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2183
<OTHER-SE>                                      996380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2363563
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   238035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (238035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (238035)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6690
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID CATOLSTER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-95-30, CA-97-94-2) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 24, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Catolster, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah Ann Ausburn, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David Catolster seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Catolster , Nos. CR-95-30; CA-97-94-2 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of WorldHeart
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Jal S. Jassawalla, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
March 31, 2005.

Dated:  May 16, 2005                      /s/ Jal S. Jassawalla
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Jal S. Jassawalla, President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)

------------------
*    A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has
     been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
     furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.
#### 1490 Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Helen C. McCabe, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of the Application of Oliver C. Wagstaff, as Trustee, et al., for Leave to Sell Real Property, Respondents. 1490 Realty Corp., Appellant; Felix A. Muldoon, as Guardian ad Litem for Sara A. Vanneck et al., Infants, Respondents.

Judgment, and orders entered November 6, 1947 and October 20, 1947, respectively, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the defendants-respondents. Order entered May 6, 1947, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with printing disbursements to the respondents in the proceeding. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 782.]
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Arthur Harris and Lakeside Packing Co. et al.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Reck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 758.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                       5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from Ultronics Corporation March 31, 1999 financial statements
                  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such
                  financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                           0000894556
<NAME>                                          Ultronics Corporation

       

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999

<CASH>                                                    17,493
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          17,493
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            17,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     1,500
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                9,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              15,993
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             1,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (1,650)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (1,650)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (1,650)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             .00
        


</TABLE>
#### Charles B. Acheson, Respondent, v. Illinois Surety Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich JJ., concurred.
- Skip to Primary Navigation
      - Skip to Main Content
      - Skip to Footer

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

        -  Water & Power            - Dams
          - Powerplants
          - Projects
          - Agrimet/Hydromet
          - Water Operations 
        -  Resources & Research            - Programs
          - Technical Service Center
          - Research & Development
          - Reclamation Manual
          - Reclamation Information Sharing Environment (RISE)
          - Environmental Resources/Reports
          - Library 
        -  About Us            - Mission
          - Fact Sheet
          - Commissioner
          - Addresses/Contacts
          - Organizational Chart
          - Leadership Bios
          - Employment
          - Contact 
        -  Recreation & Public Use            - Find Recreation
          - Recreation.gov
          - Public Use 
        -  News & Multimedia            - News Releases
          - News Stories
          - Speeches
          - Congressional Testimony
          - Fact Sheets
          - Photos
          - Multimedia
          - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

              - Reclamation
              - California-Great Basin
              - CVP
              - CVPCP
              - About the CVP Conservation Program and CVPIA Habitat Restoration Program

Region 10                - Region 10  Home
                - About Us
                - Area Offices
                - Programs & Activities
                - Projects & Facilities
                - Central Valley Project Conservation Program and CVPIA Habitat Restoration Program                    - About the Programs
                  - CVPCP
                  - HRP
                  - Program Guiding Documents and Commitments
                  - Project Area Map
                  - Project Database
                  - Priority Species
                  - Applications
                  - CVPCP & HRP Reports
                  - Recommended Links 
                - Doing Business with Reclamation
                - Public Affairs
                - Employment
                - Recreation
                - Site Index
                - Contact Us

## About the CVP Conservation Program and CVPIA Habitat Restoration Program

CVPapplications

## Background

CVPIA**Daniel Strait**
**My Nguyen**Manager, CVPIA Habitat Restoration ProgramU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServicePacific Southwest Region, Sacramento Field Office2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605Sacramento, CA 95825Phone: (916) 414-6482

*Last Updated: 8/16/23*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

            - Contact Us
            - Site Index
            - Accessibility
            - Disclaimer
            - DOI
            - FOIA
            - No Fear Act
            - Notices
            - Privacy Policy
            - Quality of Information
            - USA.gov
            - Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCharacterizing the Severe Turbulence Environments Associated With Commercial Aviation AccidentsA 44 case study analysis of the large-scale atmospheric structure associated with development of accident-producing aircraft turbulence is described. Categorization is a function of the accident location, altitude, time of year, time of day, and the turbulence category, which classifies disturbances. National Centers for Environmental Prediction Reanalyses data sets and satellite imagery are employed to diagnose synoptic scale predictor fields associated with the large-scale environment preceding severe turbulence. These analyses indicate a predominance of severe accident-producing turbulence within the entrance region of a jet stream at the synoptic scale. Typically, a flow curvature region is just upstream within the jet entrance region, convection is within 100 km of the accident, vertical motion is upward, absolute vorticity is low, vertical wind shear is increasing, and horizontal cold advection is substantial. The most consistent predictor is upstream flow curvature and nearby convection is the second most frequent predictor.Document ID20020070662Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKaplan, Michael L.*(North Carolina State Univ. Raleigh, NC United States)*Huffman, Allan W.*(North Carolina State Univ. Raleigh, NC United States)*Lux, Kevin M.*(North Carolina State Univ. Raleigh, NC United States)*Charney, Joseph J.*(North Central Research Station East Lansing, MI United States)*Riordan, Allan J.*(North Carolina State Univ. Raleigh, NC United States)*Lin, Yuh-Lang*(North Carolina State Univ. Raleigh, NC United States)*Proctor, Fred H.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 2002Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2002-211918/PT1NAS 1.26:211918/PT1Funding Number(s)OTHER: 82U-7473-008PROJECT: RTOP 728-40-30-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-99074Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020070662.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3205.15 How will I know whether my direct use lease will be issued? ( a ) If BLM decides to issue you a direct use lease, it will do so in accordance with this subpart and subpart 3206.
( b ) If BLM decides to deny your application for a direct use lease, it will advise you of its decision in writing.