alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2104. Secretary's review of prior Minerals Agreements

#### (a) Time; criteria; notice of modifications; time for compliance; effect of noncompliance

The Secretary shall review, within ninety days of December 22, 1982, any existing Minerals Agreement, which does not purport to be a lease, entered into by any Indian tribe and approved by the Secretary after January 1, 1975, but prior to December 22, 1982, to determine if such agreement complies with the purposes of this chapter. Such review shall be limited to the terms of the agreement and shall not address questions of the parties' compliance therewith. The Secretary shall notify the affected tribe and other parties to the agreement of any modifications necessary to bring an agreement into compliance with the purposes of this chapter. The tribe and other parties to such agreement shall within ninety days after notice make such modifications. If such modifications are not made within ninety days, the provisions of this chapter may not be used as a defense in any proceeding challenging the validity of the agreement.

#### (b) Review before promulgation of regulations; not Federal action

The review required by subsection (a) of this section may be performed prior to the promulgation of regulations required under section 2107 of this title and shall not be considered a Federal action within the meaning of that term in section 4332(2)(C) of title 42.

(Pub. L. 97–382, §5, Dec. 22, 1982, 96 Stat. 1939.)
DM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0497

CITY OF BOZEMAN,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RICHARD WARREN DUMAS, III,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including June 16, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 11 2021

05/11/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0497
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 506

 524

 518

 533

 529

 536

 537

 536

 535

 539

 546

 549

 554

 556

 567

 567

 581

 576

 574

 580

 584

 584

 590

 600

 600

 602

 610

 616

 623

 629

 635

 492

 495

 503

 507

 510

 515

 522

 522

 525

 528

 532

 537

 542

 545

 552

 553

 556

 562

 565

 567

 571

 572

 575

 579

 588

 592

 595

 601

 605

 614

 622

 496

 504

 510

 516

 518

 524

 527

 527

 529

 533

 538

 542

 547

 552

 557

 559

 564

 566

 568

 571

 574

 577

 582

 589

 594

 598

 601

 606

 612

 622

 629

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rito A. SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40687.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Rito A. Sanchez, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Sanchez has not filed a response to the motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56994-56995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


East Locust Creek Watershed, Putnam and Sullivan Counties, MO

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Guidelines (40 CFR part 
1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service Guidelines (7 CFR 
part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, North Central Missouri Regional Water Commission, the 
Locust Creek Watershed District, and the Sullivan County Soil and Water 
Conservation District give notice that an environmental impact 
statement (EIS) is being prepared for East Locust Creek Watershed, 
Putnam and Sullivan Counties, Missouri.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger A. Hansen, State 
Conservationist, or Harold L. Deckerd, Assistant State Conservationist, 
601 Business Loop 70 West, Parkade Center, Suite <greek-i>250, 
Columbia, MO 65203, (573) 876-0900.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicates that the project may cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, Roger Hansen, NRCS State Conservationist, 
has determined that the preparation and review of an

[[Page 56995]]

environmental impact statement (EIS) is needed for this project.
    This project involves construction of a multiple-purpose reservoir 
as a supplement to the on-going Public Law 83-566 East Locust Creek 
Watershed project. The project supplement will include one rural water 
supply reservoir with additional purposes of flood protection, 
recreation, and fish and wildlife habitat enhancement.
    A draft EIS will be prepared and circulated for review by agencies 
and the public. The Natural Resources Conservation Service invites 
participation and consultation of agencies and individuals that have 
special expertise, legal jurisdiction, or interest in the preparation 
of the draft EIS. A field investigation is scheduled for September 27 
and 28, 2004, and additional planning Meetings will be scheduled as 
needed. Further information on the proposed action may be obtained from 
Harold Deckerd, Assistant State Conservationist, at the above address 
or telephone number.

    Dated: September 16, 2004.
Roger A. Hansen,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 04-21390 Filed 9-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
§ 3282.10 When will unleased Federal lands in a participating area receive a production allocation? Unleased Federal lands within a participating area are treated as follows: ( a ) For royalty purposes only, you must allocate production to unleased Federal lands in the participating area as if the acreage were committed to the participating area.
( b ) The unit operator is primarily liable for paying and must pay royalty to the United States for such allocated production based on a rate not less than the highest royalty rate for any Federal lease in the participating area. In the event the unit operator does not pay any royalties owed under this paragraph, each lessee of lands committed to the participating area is responsible for paying such royalties in the same proportion as that lessee's percentage of surface acreage within the participating area, excluding the unleased acreage.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4696 

To require the Secretary of the Air Force to include the Modular Airborne 

Fire Fighting System mission as part of the basing criteria of the 

Air Force for C–130J aircraft for the Air National Guard. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2022 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Air Force to include the 

Modular Airborne Fire Fighting System mission as part 

of the basing criteria of the Air Force for C–130J aircraft for the Air National Guard. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Modernizing Aerial 

5 Fire Fighting Support (MAFFS) for the National Guard 

6 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4696 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO INCLUDE THE MODULAR AIR2 BORNE FIRE FIGHTING SYSTEM MISSION AS 

3 PART OF THE BASING CRITERIA FOR C–130J 

4 AIRCRAFT FOR THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD. 

5 The Secretary of the Air Force shall include the Mod6 ular Airborne Fire Fighting System (MAFFS) mission as 

7 part of the basing criteria of the Air Force for C–130J 

8 aircraft for the Air National Guard. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
                   
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         770
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1505
<ALLOWANCES>                                   131
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2862
<PP&E>                                         1449
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1023
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1252
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    3383
<COMMON>                                       10427
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11774)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3288
<SALES>                                        1754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1754
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               21
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (370)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (370)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.12)
        


</TABLE>
#### § 3514.31 May BLM waive cancellation or forfeiture?

Yes, but our waiver of any particular cause of forfeiture will not prevent us from canceling and forfeiting the lease for any other cause or for the same cause occurring at any other time.
#### Lena Bantle, Appellant, v. New York Life Insurance Company, Defendant, and Edwina Schenkenberger, Impleaded Defendant-Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Lena Bantle, Appellant, v. New York Life Insurance Company, Defendant, and Edwina Schenkenberger, Impleaded Defendant-Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment awards plaintiff the balance of the amount of insurance policies only after payment of stenographer’s fees, costs to both counsel, and payment to the impleaded defendant.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from Ultronics  Corporation June 30, 1998 financial statements
                  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such
                  financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894556
<NAME>                        Ultronics Corporation

       

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        18,529
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              0
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                18,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         0
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    12,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  18,529
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 3,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,848)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (3,848)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .00
        


</TABLE>
Case 0:20-cv-60853-RAR Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2020 Page 1 of 1
San Mateo, CA
                                                                June 15, 2000
                                                                $200,000

                             SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

For  value  received,  the  undersigned,  Hypermedia  Communications,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  ("Borrower") promises to pay MK GVD Fund ("Lender") the
principal sum of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000), with interest from the
date  hereof at a rate of ten percent  (10%) per annum,  which  amount  shall be
secured  by all of the  assets  of  Borrower.  Said  principal  shall be due and
payable on demand by  Lender,  which  demand may be made at any time,  but in no
event shall the principal be paid later than one hundred eighty (180) days after
the date of this Note. This Note may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

In the event of liquidation,  merger, sale, or winding up of the company, Lender
shall be entitled to receive,  prior and in  preference  to any other holders of
debt or equity securities,  (except as provided in item 1. below), the principal
value of this Note plus accrued interest.

The  following is a statement of the rights of the Borrower of this Note and the
conditions to which this Note is subject,  to which the Borrower and Lender,  by
the acceptance of this Note agree:

         1.  Security  Interest  - Borrower  hereby  grants to Lender a security
interest  in all assets of  Borrower  to secure  repayment  of the  indebtedness
represented  by this Note.  Borrower  hereby  represents and agrees that it will
take all actions  contemplated above including the execution of a UCC1 financing
statement,  which for the purposes of such  execution,  Borrower hereby appoints
Lender as its attorney-in-fact to execute such UCC1 financing statement.

         2. Attorneys' Fees - If any action or proceeding  shall be commenced to
enforce  this Note or any right  arising  in  connection  with  this  Note,  the
prevailing  party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover from
the other party the reasonable  attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses incurred by
such  prevailing   party  in  connection  with  such  action  or  proceeding  or
negotiation to avoid such action or proceeding.  In the event that any provision
of this Note should be deemed unlawful or unenforceable, such provision shall be
struck and the remainder  hereof shall be enforced to the fullest  extent of the
law.

         3.  Governing  Law - This Note is  issued  in and shall be  interpreted
under the laws of the State of California.

Issued this 15 day of June, 2000.

                                          Hypermedia Communications, Inc.


                                          By: __________________

                                          Title: ________________
Appeal Reinstated; Order filed October 4, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00475-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF L.E.B, A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10FD0110

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 29, 2018. The trial court has 

signed an order in accordance with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 306a finding 

appellant first received actual notice of the final judgment on June 21, 2018. The 

notice of appeal was therefore due July 23, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant 

timely filed the notice of appeal on June 11, 2018.

The appeal is ordered reinstated. The reporter’s record is due on or before 

November 5, 2018.

PER CURIAM
Sac ramento

River

Sycamore

Meridian

T15N R1W T15N R1E

3

9 7

6 4 2 1

21 22 19

11

23 24

30

10

16 15

27

18

28 26 25

12

14 13

33 34 35 36 31

5

8

33 34 35 31

5

36

8

20

17

29

20

17

32

29

32

32

32

76.5 R

78.9 R

83.0 R

84.0 R

85.6 R

Contract No. 14-06-200-874A-R-1

Exhibit B

Steidlmayer, Anthony E., et al.

725-202-128

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

Date: November 22, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\steidlmayer_anthony_e_et_al\steidlmayer_anthony_e_et_al.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

0 0.5

Miles
§ 3802.6 Public availability of information. ( a ) All data and information concerning Federal and Indian minerals submitted under this subpart 3802 are subject to part 2 of this title. Part 2 of this title includes the regulations of the Department of the Interior covering the public disclosure of data and information contained in Department of the Interior records. Certain mineral information not protected from public disclosure under part 2 may of this title be made available for inspection without a Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) request.
( b ) When you submit data and information under this subpart 3802 that you believe to be exempt from disclosure to the public, you must clearly mark each page that you believe includes confidential information. BLM will keep all data and information confidential to the extent allowed by § 2.13(c) of this title.
[63 FR 52954, Oct. 1, 1998]
§ 2881.11 When do I need a grant from BLM for an oil and gas pipeline? You must have a BLM grant under 30 U.S.C. 185 for an oil or gas pipeline or related facility to cross Federal lands under: ( a ) BLM's jurisdiction; or
( b ) The jurisdiction of two or more Federal agencies.
#### § 3602.46 What is the term of a competitive contract?

The term of the contract will be in the sales notice. BLM will not issue a competitive contract for the sale of mineral materials for a term exceeding 10 years. However, the 10-year period does not include any contract extension under § 3602.27, any contract renewal under § 3602.47, and any periods for removal of equipment and improvements under § 3601.52 of this part.
§ 3830.22 Will BLM refund service charges or fees? ( a ) BLM will not refund service charges, except for overpayments.
( b ) BLM will refund maintenance and location fees if: ( 1 ) At the time you or your predecessor in interest located the mining claim or site, the location was on land not open to mineral entry or otherwise not available for mining claim or site location; or
( 2 ) At the time you paid the fees, the mining claim or site was void.
( c ) BLM will apply maintenance and location fee overpayments to future years if you so request.
§ 3832.11 How do I locate mining claims or sites? ( a ) You must follow both state and Federal law.
( b ) Your lode or placer claim is not valid until you make a discovery within the boundaries of the claim.
( c ) To locate a claim or site, you must— ( 1 ) Make certain that the land on which you are locating the claim or site is Federal land that is open to mineral entry
( 2 ) Stake and monument the corners of a mining claim or site which meets applicable state monumenting requirements and the size limitations described in § 3832.22 for lode and placer claims, § 3832.32 for mill sites, and § 3832.42 for tunnel sites;
( 3 ) Post the notice of location in a conspicuous place on the claim or site. The notice must include: ( i ) The name or names of the locators;
( ii ) The date of the location; and
( iii ) A description of the claim or site;
( iv ) The name or number of the claim or site, or both, if the claim or site has both;
( 4 ) Record the notice or certificate of location in the local recording office and the BLM State Office with jurisdiction according to the procedures in part 3833;
( 5 ) Follow all other relevant state law requirements; and
( 6 ) Comply with the specific requirements for lode claims, placer claims, mill sites, or tunnel sites in this part.
§ 3835.32 What should I include when I submit an affidavit of assessment work? When you submit an affidavit of assessment work as required in § 3835.31(d), you must include the following: ( a ) The name and, if available, the BLM serial number of the claim for which you did assessment work;
( b ) Any known changes in the mailing addresses of the claimants;
( c ) A processing fee for each mining claim affected. (See the table of service charges and fees in § 3830.21 of this chapter); and
( d ) An exact legible reproduction or duplicate, other than microfilm or other electronic media, of either: ( 1 ) The affidavit of assessment work that you filed or will file in the county where the claim is located; or
( 2 ) The report of geological, geochemical, and geophysical surveys you filed in the county where the claim is located, as provided for in part 3836 of this chapter.
[68 FR 61064, Oct. 24, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 58879, Oct. 7, 2005]
### §961. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 87–235, §1, Sept. 14, 1961, 75 Stat. 508, which related to membership roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3837.30 Disputes about acquiring a delinquent co-claimant's interests. If co-claimants are engaged in a dispute regarding the acquisition of a delinquent co-claimant's interests— ( a ) The co-claimants must resolve the dispute, without BLM involvement, in a court of competent jurisdiction or proceeding as permitted within the state where the disputed claims are located.
( b ) The co-claimants must file with BLM a certified copy of the judgment, decree, or settlement agreement resolving the dispute before BLM will update its records.