alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 1196

Claimant awarded $54.00.)

#### Thomas R. Crabb, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 26, 1927.*

*Reimbursement*— when *award will he made. State employee.*There being no dispute as to the facts in this case, and no objection by the State, the court enters an award in favor of claimant to reimburse him for moneys expended in being cured of injuries sustained by him, while in the discharge of his duty.

Thomas R. Crabb, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank B. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The declaration filed in this case alleges that on July 21, 1926, and for a long time prior thereto, Thomas B. Crabb was an employe of the State of Illinois, by appointment of Louis L. Emmerson, Secretary of State of the State of Illinois, as automobile investigator; that his duties under such employment included among other things, a general supervision and regulation of the motor vehicle traffic on the system of hard roads constructed by the State of Illinois; that in the performance of his duties he used a motorcycle, furnished by the State of Illinois; that pursuant to his duties as such automobile investigator, on July 21, 1926, between 10:15 p. m., and 10:30 p. m., he was proceeding from Joliet, Illinois, to Lockport, Illinois; and in exercising all due care and caution for his own safety, he collided with a Ford coupe, driven by one J. L. Gage of Marseilles, Illinois, at the corner of Collins Street, and Meeker Avenue, Joliet, Illinois; that by reason of said collision, he was thrown from the motorcycle upon which he was riding upon and against a telephone pole and was thereby then and there bruised, injured and wounded and suffered injuries to his head, ankle and knee and claimant became and *433was sick, sore, lame and disordered and so remained for a long space of time, to-wit: From the 21st day of July to the 17th day of August 1926, both inclusive; that during all of said time he suffered great pain and was hindered and prevented from attending to and transacting his affairs and business, and was forced to and did then and there lay out divers sums of money, amounting to, to-wit, $54.00, in endeavoring to be cured of his said wounds and bruises, and he makes a claim for said sum of $54.00.

A letter from Louis L. Emmerson, Secretary of State, states that he has investigated the facts set out in the declaration in this case, and that said facts are correctly set out and recommends that said claim be allowed..

Therefore we award claimant the sum of $54.00.
Cite as 2013 Ark. 486

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CR-13-671

ED DESHAWN HARRIS

 APPELLANT

v.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

 APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered November 21, 2013 

PRO SE MOTION TO CORRECT

THE RECORD [PULASKI COUNTY

CIRCUIT COURT, 60CR-09-1184,

HON. CHRISTOPHER CHARLES

PIAZZA, JUDGE]

MOTION GRANTED; REMANDED

TO SETTLE THE RECORD.

PER CURIAM

Appellant Ed Deshawn Harris timely lodged in this court an appeal from an order of

the Pulaski County Circuit Court denying his pro se petition for writ of error coram nobis. 

Now before us is appellant’s pro se motion to correct the record. We agree that the record

appears to be incorrect, and we remand to the circuit court to settle the record.

The record, as appellant notes in his motion, contains the judgment-and-commitment

order of Justin Lamar Eason, a codefendant of appellant’s, but does not include appellant’s

judgment-and-commitment order. This court may direct that an omission in a record on

appeal be corrected by filing a certified, supplemental record. Ark. R. App. P.–Civil 6(e)

(2013) (as made applicable to criminal cases by Ark. R. App. P.–Crim. 4(a) (2013)). 

Accordingly, we remand the case to the circuit court to correct and supplement the record. 

The circuit court shall transmit to this court within thirty days from the date of this opinion

the corrected-and-supplemented record containing the appropriate judgment-andcommitment order. 

Motion granted; remanded to settle the record.
§ 2866.42 How will the BLM calculate rent for Communications Uses within a federally owned communications facility? ( a ) If you are an occupant of a federally owned communication facility, you must have your own grant and pay rent in accordance with these regulations; and
( b ) If a Federal agency holds a grant and agrees to operate the facility as a facility owner under § 2866.31, occupants do not need a separate BLM grant, and the BLM will calculate and charge rent to the Federal facility owner under §§ 2866.30 through 2866.44.
**FORM 10-Q**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

 

**(Mark One)**

|   | (X) | **QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008**

 

**OR**

 

|   | (  ) | **TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | **For the transition period** | **to** |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|

 

**Commission file number****1-11394**

 

**MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.**

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

| **Delaware**                    | **95-3863205**      |
|---------------------------------|---------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer    |
| incorporation or organization)  | Identification No.) |

 

| **402 West County Road D, St. Paul, Minnesota** | **55112**  |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------|
| (Address of principal executive offices)        | (Zip Code) |

 

Registrant's telephone number including area code:      **(651) 636-7466**

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

|   | Yes [ X ] | No [ | ] |
|--------|-----------|------|---|

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.               

| Large accelerated filer [ | ] | Accelerated filer [ X ] | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company  [ | ] |
|---------------------------|---|-------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------|---|

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 

|   | Yes [ | ] | No [ X ] |
|--------|-------|---|----------|

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

 

| Class                                   |   | Outstanding at July 16, 2008 |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
| Common Stock, $0.15 par value per share |   | 8,456,623                    |

 

 

----
#### § 3604.11 How do I apply for a free use permit?

If you wish to apply for free use of mineral materials, you may file a letter of request or a BLM standard application form approved by the Office of Management and Budget.
### §211. Allowance of deductions

In computing taxable income under section 63, there shall be allowed as deductions the items specified in this part, subject to the exceptions provided in part IX (section 261 and following, relating to items not deductible).

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 69; Pub. L. 95–30, title I, §102(b)(3), May 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 137.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1977—Pub. L. 95–30 substituted "section 63" for "section 63(a)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1977 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–30 applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1976, see section 106(a) of Pub. L. 95–30, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
===============================================================================
                                  Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the amended Annual Report of Whistler Investments,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Holly
Roseberry,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge:  (1) The Report fully  complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

                                           /s/ Holly Roseberry
                                           ---------------------
                                           Holly Roseberry
                                           Chief Executive Officer
July 21, 2004
Exhibit 10.2

Mr. Mark Popp
Interbet Inc.
655 Montgomery St.
1st Floor
San Francisco
California 94111
USA

July 31, 1997

Mr. Popp:

Re: Approval of Application-Interbet Inc.

Kindly be advised that your application on behalf of Interbet Inc. for a licence
(sic) from the Free Trade and Processing  Zone to operate an off-shore  internet
casino gaming operation has been approved in principle subject to the receipt of
all required documentation and completion of due diligence. Please note that due
diligence  is a  continuous  process  conducted  for the  duration of the period
specified by the licence (sic).

Sincerely,

/s/Vere Murphy
Mr. Vere Murphy
Commissioner
<PAGE>
Exhibit
99.1





Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Bastet Broadcasting, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |    
|------------------- |  | ---
|                   
|Dated: May 30, 2003 |  | By:
|                    |  |    



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### §398b. Proceeds from rentals, royalties, and bonuses; disposition

The proceeds from rentals, royalties, or bonuses of oil and gas leases upon lands within Executive order Indian reservations or withdrawals shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States to the credit of the tribe of Indians for whose benefit the reservation or withdrawal was created or who are using and occupying the land, and shall draw interest at the rate of 4 per centum per annum and be available for appropriation by Congress for expenses in connection with the supervision of the development and operation of the oil and gas industry and for the use and benefit of such Indians: Provided, That said Indians, or their tribal council, shall be consulted in regard to the expenditure of such money, but no per capita payment shall be made except by Act of Congress.

(Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 299, §2, 44 Stat. 1347.)
##### 



Exhibit 10.4
 Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan Enhancement  Addendum to Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan
 Each bonus eligible associate of the Company will receive a one-time bonus enhancement applicable
to the associates Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Bonus Plan (but excluding Store Manager and Assistant
Store Manager level annual bonus plans, and other special project bonuses). Aaron Brothers
District Managers are on a quarterly bonus plan and will be eligible for an enhancement plan using
similar concepts as outlined below.
 Purpose
  Bonus Plan Enhancement Details
 1.
    
    The eligibility provisions set forth in the associates FY 2006 Bonus Plan apply to
this Bonus Enhancement.2.
    
    The Company guarantees a bonus payment to the associate under the FY 2006 Bonus Plan at
a payout level of one step below Target (i.e.,Plan 100%), to be paid in March 2007.3.
    
    In addition to the bonus payout outlined in the associates FY 2006 Bonus Plan, each
associate will be eligible to receive an additional bonus payment of between 0% and 75% of
the Target bonus percentage. Determination of the additional bonus payment will be based
solely upon the associates FY 2006 Performance Appraisal rating, as follows:
 FY 2006 Performance Appraisal Rating*
    
    Additional Payout PotentialExceeds Expectations
    
    75% of Target bonus payoutHigh Meets Expectations
    
    50% of Target bonus payoutLow Meets Expectations
    
    25% of Target bonus payoutNeeds Development
    
    0%
 
 *
    
    More details on this rating scale will be distributed prior to the FY 2006 mid-year
review Example
 1.
    
    Assume an employee with a FY 2006 bonus eligible salary of $60,000 (as of FY begin:
January 29, 2006), with a Target bonus of 10% and Super bonus of 15%, as outlined in the
employees FY 2006 Bonus Plan.2.
    
    At a payout level of one step below Target (FY 2006 guarantee), the FY 2006 bonus
payment would be:
 
    
    $60,000 X 8.75% = $5,250 (may be higher based upon actual bonus plan
criteria performance)
 3.
    
    The additional payout potential based upon the associates individual performance would
add the following, depending upon the FY 2006 Performance Appraisal rating:
 
    
    If Low Meets Expectations (25% X Target 10% X $60,000) = $1,500
    
    If High Meets Expectations (50% X Target 10% X $60,000) = $3,000
    
    If Exceeds Expectations (75% X Target 10% X $60,000) = $4,500
 4.
    
    If the associate is rated Low Meets Expectations, the total minimum payout potential
would be:
 
    
    $5,250 + $1,500 = $6,750
 5.
    
    If the associate is rated Exceeds Expectations and the Super payout level is achieved,
the payout potential would be:
 
    
    $60,000 X 15% = $6,000 plus $4,500 = $10,500
 Plan Modifications
§ 3284.2 What are the principal operational responsibilities of the unit operator? The unit operator is responsible for: ( a ) Diligently drilling for and developing in the public interest the geothermal resource occurring in the unit area. Only the unit operator is authorized to conduct: ( 1 ) Any phase of drilling authorized under subpart 3260 of this chapter, unless another person is specifically authorized by BLM to conduct drilling (see § 3284.3);
( 2 ) Resource development activities such as production and injection; and
( 3 ) Delivery of the resource for commercial operation. An entity other than the unit operator, such as a facility operator, may purchase or utilize the resource produced from the unit.
( b ) Providing written notification to BLM within 30 days after any changes to the commitment status of any lease or tract in the unit area (see §§ 3281.9 and 3284.12); and
( c ) Insuring that the Federal Government receives all royalties, direct use fees, and rents for activities within the participating area.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT NOVEMBER 30, 1997, THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AT NOVEMBER 30, 1997, AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AT NOVEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                       724
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,950
<PP&E>                                         131,076
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,096
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,987
<SALES>                                         48,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,523
<CGS>                                           35,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    765
<INCOME-TAX>                                       268
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                497
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
(No. 924

Claimant awarded $416.00.)

#### Indiana Bridge Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 19,*1927.

*Contract*— -when *State liaMe.*There being no dispute as to the facts ■ and the law in this case the court enters an award in favor of claimant for the amount of his claim.

Sampson & Giffin, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for extra labor in changing the design and construction of the Peoria Armory at Peoria, Illinois.

On the 10th of May, 1923, claimant entered into a written contract with the defendant to provide all the materials and perform all the work shown on the drawings and described in the specifications for structural steel of the Armory building' for the National Guard at Peoria, for an agreed price of $28,-230.00.

On the 27th day of July, 1923, the defendant, through the Department of Public Works and Buildings, entered into a supplemental contract with claimant whereby claimant agreed to deliver and erect.an additional steel truss for the building, together with columns, purlins, girts and lintels, for an additional sum of $6,400.00. This additional work made it necessary to change the drawings and, by direction of the supervising architect of the defendant, the necessary changes, were made.

The Attorney General, on behalf of defendant, has filed a statement and attached thereto a letter from the supervising *248engineer of the defendant in which he admits that claimant is entitled to an award for the changes made in the design and construction of the Armory. The proof of the claim is in the form of affidavits and claimant actually expended $416.00 in having these changes made. Claimant is therefore awarded the sum of $416.00 to reimburse it for the amount expended in having the changes made in the drawings.
§ 3871.1 Filing of claim. ( a ) An adverse claim must be filed with the authorized officer of the proper office where the application for patent is filed or with the manager of the district in which the land is situated at the time of filing the adverse claim. The claim may be filed by the adverse claimant, or by his duly authorized agent or attorney in fact cognizant of the facts stated.
( b ) Where an agent or attorney in fact files the adverse claim he must furnish proof that he is such agent or attorney.
( c ) The agent or attorney in fact must sign the statement of the adverse claim within the land district where the claim is situated, stating that it was so signed.
( d ) Each adverse claim filed must include the processing fee for adverse claims found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter.
[35 FR 9759, June 13, 1970, as amended at 70 FR 58880, Oct. 7, 2005]
Exhibit 31.1 Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries Certification Of Chief Executive Officer PURSUANT TO RULE 13a  14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Rodney M. Tiede, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Broadcast International, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.         The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c.      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date: November 10, 2006  /s/ Rodney M. Tiede Rodney M. Tiede Chief Executive Officer