alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### PART I—PENALTY, SEIZURE, AND FORFEITURE PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO DISTILLING, RECTIFYING, AND DISTILLED AND RECTIFIED PRODUCTS

Sec.
5601.
Criminal penalties.
5602.
Penalty for tax fraud by distiller.
5603.
Penalty relating to records, returns, and reports.
5604.
Penalties relating to marks, brands, and containers.
5605.
Penalty relating to return of materials used in the manufacture of distilled spirits, or from which distilled spirits may be recovered.
5606.
Penalty relating to containers of distilled spirits.
5607.
Penalty and forfeiture for unlawful use, recovery, or concealment of denatured distilled spirits, or articles.
5608.
Penalty and forfeiture for fraudulent claims for export drawback or unlawful relanding.
5609.
Destruction of unregistered stills, distilling apparatus, equipment, and materials.
5610.
Disposal of forfeited equipment and material for distilling.
5611.
Release of distillery before judgment.
5612.
Forfeiture of taxpaid distilled spirits remaining on bonded premises.
5613.
Forfeiture of distilled spirits not closed, marked, or branded as required by law.
5614.
Burden of proof in cases of seizure of spirits.
5615.
Property subject to forfeiture.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part I consisted of sections 5601 to 5650, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1313.

#### Amendments

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §454(c)(11)(B), (12)(C), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 822, struck out "stamps," in item 5604, and substituted "closed" for "stamped" in item 5613.
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancesset forth inLocalRule

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Nos. 95-31278 & 96-30333

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee. 

versus

DONETTA DORSETT,

Defendant-Appellant.

* * * * * * * *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DORAL HILLS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-203-L

October 9, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*
47.5.4.

2

Donetta Dorsett and Doral Hills appeal their guilty-plea convictions for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride and for

carrying a firearm in relation to the commission of a drug trafficking crime in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) & 21 U.S.C. § 846. A loaded 9mm pistol was

found on the frontseat of the vehicle on the driver’sside. Dorsett contends that she

did not have knowledge of the presence of the firearm and, therefore, she cannot

be held criminally liable under § 924(c). Hills contends that the factual basis

supporting his conviction is insufficient because the transaction took place away

from the vehicle and, therefore, it cannot be said that the firearm was carried “in

relation to” a drug transaction. The parties appeal their firearm convictions in light

of the intervening decision in Bailey v. United States, 116 S.Ct. 501 (1995).

We conclude that Bailey does not support appellants’ challenges. Based on

the authorities and analysis by the district court in its scholarly Order and Reasons

signed and entered February 9, 1996, the convictions appealed are AFFIRMED.
#### The Prest-O-Lite Company v. Frederick Ray and Others.

Motion granted. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 3602.41 When will BLM sell mineral materials on a competitive basis?

Except for sales from community pits and common use areas under subpart 3603 of this part, and noncompetitive sales under § 3602.30 *et seq.,* BLM will make sales only after inviting competitive bids through publication and posting under § 3602.42.
5

5

5

5

5

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

19.6L (1.0S)

!

19.6L (2.0S)

2.15L

T11N R3E

T10N R4E

T11N R4E

T11N R5E

T9N R4E

T10N R5E

T9N R3E

T10N R3E

T9N R5E

YYOOLLOO CC OO

SSAA CC RRAA MM EE NN TTOO CCOO

SS UUTT TTEE RR CCOO

PPLLAA CCEE RR CCOO

Bryte

Verona

Broderick

Rio Linda

Pleasant Grove

§ ̈¦80

§ ̈¦5

§ ̈¦5

·|}þ99

·|}þ16

1

·|}þ60

·|}þ80

6.1L

7.5L

14.1L

16.0L

19.6L

Tule Canal

East Canal

Main

Canal

Cross

Canal

0

5

9

4

9

9

7

3

6

8

2 1

7

8

8

6

8

6

2

9 8

7

5

6

9

8

3

7

4

5

7

5

1

7 9

4

4

9

3 2 1 6 5

1

7

4

8

3

11

11

11

28

11

32

4

29

5

17

21

30

23

1

16

6

26

35

14

35

31

14

10

36

16

23

35

18

31

10

24

32

26

17

12

32

23

19

29 28

34

10

32

17

15

2

29

22

12

19

30

33

13

30

21

14 16

36

24

30

30

31

19

23

20

12

36

25

20

16

36

27

18

24

26

10

20

22

17

33

30

25

12

13

31

19

18

22

27

29

21

25

21

34

18

25

19

16

24

14

15

33

13

17

19

13 15

15

18

33

28

29

20

16

22

21

7

31

28

3

18

27

34

26

24

6

29

4

17

20

5

16

21

28

6

33

32

35

19

3

28

21

27

20

10

15

15

1

22

10

26

19

27

30

13

31

18

22

12

30

1

25

13

24

36

12

25

25

24

13

31

17

32

23

25

24

12

13

36

33

2

12

1

36

" Contract No. 14-06-200-885A-R-1

Exhibit B

Natomas Central Mutual Water Co.

725-202-35

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1 2 3

Miles

Contractor's Service Area - Ag Only

Contractor's Service Area - Ag and/or M&I

District Boundary

! Point of Diversion

Date: 3/7/05, Revised 4/11/05, 9/27/05

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\natomas_central\natomas_central.mxd
#### § 3504.10 What fees must I pay?

(a) The following table shows fees for various documents in this part.

| Document | Processing fee |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Applications other than those listed below | As found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter. |
| (2) Prospecting permit application | Case-by-case basis as described in § 3000.11 of this chapter. |
| (3) Prospecting permit application amendment | As found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter. |
| (4) Prospecting permit extension | As found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter. |
| (5) Preference right lease application | Case-by-case basis as described in § 3000.11 of this chapter. |
| (6) Successful competitive lease application | Case-by-case basis as described in § 3000.11 of this chapter, and modified by §§ 3508.14 and 3508.21. |
| (7) Future or fractional interest lease application | Case-by-case basis as described in § 3000.11 of this chapter. |
| (8) Lease modification or fringe acreage lease | As found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter. |
| (9) Lease renewal application | As found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter. |
| (10) Assignment, sublease, or transfer of operating rights | As found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter. |
| (11) Transfer of overriding royalty | As found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter. |
| (12) Application to waive, suspend, or reduce your rental, minimum royalty, or royalty rate | Case-by-case basis as described in § 3000.11 of this chapter. |
| (13) Use permit | As found in the fee schedule in § 3000.12 of this chapter. |

(b) Fees for exploration licenses are not administered under this section, but are administered under part 2920 of this chapter.

[72 FR 50887, Sept. 5, 2007]
Exhibit 32.1





                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


  /s/ Mark J. Cowan
  Mark J. Cowan
  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
  August 9, 2005
#### § 3275.10 How do I change my operations if I have an approved facility construction or commercial use permit?

Send BLM a completed and signed Sundry Notice describing your proposed change. Until we approve your Sundry Notice, you must continue to comply with the original permit terms.
§ 3430.5-4 Lease exchange. ( a ) Upon the request of the applicant, the Secretary may initiate lease exchange procedures under subpart 3435 of this title if the lands under application have been shown to contain coal in commercial quantities.
( b ) Upon the request of the authorized officer, or at the request of the regional coal team or the Governor of the affected State(s), the Secretary may initiate lease exchange procedures under subpart 3435 of this title if: ( 1 ) The lands under application have been shown to contain commercial quantities of coal;
( 2 ) All or a portion of the proposed lease has been assessed as lands which should be unavailable for coal development because of land use or resource conflicts or as lands which are unsuitable for coal mining under the provisions of subpart 3461 of this title; and
( 3 ) The lands are exempted from the application of any relevant unsuitability criteria or the Secretary lacks the authority to prevent damage to or loss of the land use or resource values threatened by lease operations.
[47 FR 33143, July 30, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 37656, Aug. 19, 1983]
```

                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. "1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. "1350, I, the undersigned
Chairman & CEO of Seaview Video Technology Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify,
based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company
for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

George S. Bernardich, III
January 16, 2002
```
§ 3601.41 What information must I include in my mining plan? If BLM requires you to submit a mining plan, it must include: ( a ) A map, sketch, or aerial photograph identifying the area for which you are applying, the area and depth you plan to disturb, existing and proposed access, and the names and locations of major topographic and known cultural features;
( b ) A description of your proposed methods of operation and the periods during which you will operate;
( c ) A description of measures you will take to prevent hazards to public health and safety and to minimize and mitigate environmental damage; and
( d ) Such other information as BLM may require.
No. 12,841.

#### Getz *v.*Mosca Irrigation District.

(1 P. [2d] 101)

Decided May 25, 1931.

Rehearing denied June 29, 1931.

Mr. John F. Mail, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. George M. Corlett, Mr. Claude W. Corlett, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Burke

delivered the opinion of the court.

Dependant in error brought this action in ejectment against plaintiff in error, claiming* ownership in fee and right of possession of certain real property by virtue of *215tax deeds. These claims were denied and the canse was tried to the court. '’Findings were for defendant in error and judgment was entered accordingly. To review that judgment plaintiff in error prosecutes this writ and asks that it be made a supersedeas.

The complaint herein was filed a few days after the complaint in No. 12,840, *Pendleton v. Mosca Irrigation District,*89 Colo. 209, 1 P. (2d) 99, this day decided. The causes took exactly the same course, were tried on the same day, the same character of evidence offered by the parties, and the same law relied upon, as there. For the reasons given in that opinion this judgment is affirmed.

Mr, Chiee Justice Adams, Mr. Justice Butler and Mr. Justice Moore concur.
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 136705 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 136705 COA: 275086 Wayne CC: 05-010478-01 LYNN NEIL JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          69,515
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,520
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    297,456
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        435,060
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 849,490
<DEPOSITS>                                     598,362
<SHORT-TERM>                                   100,266
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,618
<LONG-TERM>                                     62,653<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,489
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 849,490
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 29,956
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               13,860
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   897
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                44,713
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,838
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,695
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,018
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    (349)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   4
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,732
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,010
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,010
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.67<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.32
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,515
<LOANS-PAST>                                       566
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 3,451
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    163
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,807
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      953
<RECOVERIES>                                       730
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,235
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,235
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Long term and other notes payable
<F2>Basic Eps
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Graphic omitted] Ahold
                                                  Press Release

                                                  Royal Ahold
                                                  Corporate Communications



                                           Date:  December 2, 2004
                           For more information:  +31 75 659 57 20



Ahold completes sale of its Spanish retail activities

Zaandam, The Netherlands, December 2, 2004 - Ahold today announced it has
successfully completed the sale of its Spanish retail activities to the Permira
Funds.

Ahold and Permira announced the transaction on October 3, 2004. The closing was
subject to customary price adjustments and the fulfilment of certain conditions,
including antitrust approval.

Permira is a leading European-based private equity firm which acts as adviser to
the 18 Permira Funds, totaling approximately EUR 11 billion. The Permira Funds
have invested in over 260 transactions in 15 countries, in companies across a
variety of sectors and geographies.

Employing some 14,000 associates, Ahold operated almost 600 stores on the
Spanish mainland and the Canary Islands with 2003 net sales of approximately EUR
2 billion. Ahold announced its intention to divest its Spanish retail operation
on November 7, 2003, as part of its strategic plan to optimize its portfolio and
to strengthen its financial position.



Ahold Corporate Communications: +31.75.659.5720



                                                  Albert Heijnweg 1 Zaandam
                                                  P.0. Box 3050, 1500 HB Zaandam
                                                  The Netherlands
                                                  Phone: +31 (0)75 659 5720
http://www.ahold.com                              Fax:   +31 (0)75 659 8302
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. 

Edmund G. Brown, Jr.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SAFEWAY, INC., a Safeway No. 08-55671 Company doing business as Vons;

ALBERTSON’S D.C. No. , INC.; RALPHS 

GROCERY 2:04-cv-00687-AG- COMPANY, a division of

the Kroger Company; FOOD 4 LESS SS

FOOD COMPANY, a division of the

Kroger Company; VONS COMPANIES

INC., an indirect, wholly owned

subsidiary of Safeway, Inc.,

Defendants-Appellees, 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. 

Edmund G. Brown, Jr.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SAFEWAY, INC., a Safeway No. 08-55708

Company doing business as Vons; D.C. No.

ALBERTSONS, INC.; RALPHS GROCERY  2:04-cv-00687-AGCOMPANY, a division of the Kroger SS

Company; FOOD 4 LESS FOOD ORDER COMPANY, a division of the Kroger

Company; VONS COMPANIES INC.,

an indirect, wholly owned

subsidiary of Safeway, Inc.,

Defendants-Appellees. 

2655
Filed February 11, 2011

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it

is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit

Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 

Judges Bybee and Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

2656 STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. SAFEWAY, INC.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Litfunding, Corp, Inc. a Nevada corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      Morton Reed, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best
      of
      his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Litfunding, Corp., and will be retained by Litfunding, Corp., Inc., and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




/s/
              Morton
              ReedMorton Reed
              Chief
                  Executive Officer
                April
                  17, 2007








1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 886

 871

 856

 972

 1,170

 1,228

 1,235

 1,222

 1,243

 1,247

 1,198

 1,170

 1,076

 1,070

 1,021

 951

 944

 935

 912

 905

 899

 889

 841

 794

 753

 737

 738

 731

 688

 652

 607

 818

 819

 736

 805

 981

 1,153

 1,170

 1,186

 1,208

 1,184

 1,130

 1,052

 1,027

 945

 919

 898

 887

 865

 879

 860

 841

 797

 757

 729

 697

 576

 721

 676

 641

 589

 563

 844

 842

 786

 893

 1,081

 1,185

 1,220

 1,211

 1,230

 1,235

 1,174

 1,110

 1,041

 1,019

 971

 912

 903

 891

 889

 876

 872

 853

 799

 762

 732

 706

 729

 697

 657

 619

 588

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
### §458aaa–4. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458aaa–4 was editorially reclassified as section 5385 of this title.
### [Subpart E—Repealed]