AlllQQ =1^bl3fi

llATL INST OF STANDARDS

^S';!..';!.',-^'

A1 11 009961 38

iyjJailii'.';„,.w,i;i(U4(„.i,-

NBS BUILDING SCIENCE SERIES III

Investigation of Standards,

Performance Characteristics and

Evaluation Criteria for Thermoplastic

Piping in Residential Plumbing Systems

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

NBS BUILDING SCIENCE SERIES III

Investigation of Standards,

Performance Characteristics and

Evaluation Criteria for Thermoplastic

Piping in Residential Plumbing Systems

R. S. Wyly, W. J. Parker,* E. T. Pierce, D. E. Rorrer,

J. R. Shaver, G. C. Sherlin, and M. Tryon

Center for Building Technology

National Engineering Laboratory

National Bureau of Standards

Washington, D.C. 20234

Center for Fire Research

National Engineering Laboratory

National Bureau of Standards

VS^ashington, D.C. 20234

Sponsored by

Office of Policy Development and Research Department of Housing and Urban Development

Washington, D.C. 20410

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary

Dr. Sidney Harman, Under Secretary

Jordan J. Baruch, Assistant Secretary for Science and Technology

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, Director

Issued May 1978

n 1
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 78-600037

National Bureau of Standards Building Science Series 111

Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), Bldg. Sci. Ser. Ill, 152 pages (May 1978) CODEN: BSSNBV

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1978

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20234 SD Catalog Stock No. 003-003- Price (Add 25 percent additional for other than U.S. mailing).
CONTENTS

Page

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

ABSTRACT

1. INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 General Statement 1 1.2 Background and Theory of Performance Evaluation 2 1.3 Objective and Scope 11 1.4 Approach 13

2. CURRENT STATUS OF THE USAGE OF THERMOPLASTIC PIPING FOR RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING . 15

2.1 Applications of Thermoplastics in Plumbing Systems 15 2.2 Code Approvals 19

3. SUMMARY OF NBS LABORATORY STUDIES 25

3.1 Thermal Properties 25

3.2 Fire Safety 27 3.3 Resistance to Intermittent Hot-Water Exposure and Shock Pressure (Water

Hammer) 32 3.4 Acoustics 37

4. AN APPROACH TO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PIPING MATERIALS 39

4.1 Status of Traditional Methods of Evaluation 39 4.2 User Needs and Measures of Performance 40

4.3 Format for Performance Criteria 43

5. PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FOR THERMOPLASTIC PIPING 49

5.1 Organization of the Criteria 49

5.2 Criteria for Functional Adequacy 50

A.l Leak Resistance 51

A. 2 Drainability and Hydraulic Capacity 55 A. 3 Acoustical Acceptability 59

5.3 Criteria for Health and Life Safety 69

B. l Toxicological Acceptability 70

B. 2 Fire Safety 73 5.4 Criteria for Durability and Maintainability 81

C. l Retention of Properties for Essential Functional Performance. ... 82

6. CONCLUSIONS '

.

93

6.1 Status and Benefits of Performance Evaluation Methodology for Piping

Materials in Residential Plumbing 93

6.2 General Adequacy of Thermoplastic Piping for Residential Plumbing. ... 98

6.3 Fire Safety 99

iii
6.4 Thermal Performance 99

6.5 Resistance to Shock Pressure 100

6.6 Acoustical Performance 101

6.7 Water Quality 102

6.8 Future Needs 102

6.9 Acknowledgment i • • 103

i

1 REFERENCES j 105

APPENDIX 109

8.1 Definitions and Nomenclature 107

8.2 Model Codes, Specifications and Standards 114

8.3 Sources of Industry Technical Information Relating to the Selection

of Materials and to the Design and Installation of Thermoplastic

Piping Systems 136

8.4 Units of Measure and S. I. Conversion Factors 144

iv
1 LIST OF FIGURES

Page

Figure 1. Basic Needs in Developing and Implementing the Performance

Approach . 3

Figure 2. The Dilemma of Durability Evaluation 4

Figure 3. Model for Performance Evaluation 5

Figure 4. Production in the United States During 1972 of Thermoplastic Pipe,

Tube and Fittings, Identified by End Use 18

Figure 5. Essential Steps in Performance Evaluation 44

Figure 6. Classification Hierarchy for Performance Evaluation of Piping

Materials 46

LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table 1. Thermoplastic Piping Uses Authorized by Local Plumbing Codes: 1976

and 1977 21

Table 2. Allowable Uses of Thermoplastic Piping Materials for Residential

Plumbing Systems, as Recommended by Several Authorities 23

Table 3. Matrix: Criteria for Piping Materials 47

Table 4. Status of Performance Evaluation Methodology for Thermoplastic

Piping for Residential, Above-Ground Potable Water, Sanitary

Drainage and Venting 95

Table 5. Brief Description of Selected ASTM Tests on Properties of Plastics

and Plastic Pipes and Fittings 123

V
ABSTRACT

The application of the performance concept to the evaluation of piping

systems of innovative materials is explored. User needs are considered

and several material-related physical parameters are studied that might

be used as measures of satisfaction of the user needs.

Information was reviewed on usage, performance characteristics

and standards for thermoplastic pipe and fittings, and special laboratory

tests were made to study selected characteristics and test methods. A

number of performance statements and evaluation methods are recommended

or discussed that relate to characteristics associated with polyvinyl

chloride (PVC), acrylonitr ile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) and chlorinated

polyvinyl chloride (CPVC). This approach was taken to illustrate

the application of performance evaluation methodology to plumbing materials.

The results indicate that PVC, ABS and CPVC can be used satisfactorily

in a number of residential plumbing applications if appropriate attention

is given to the selection of the materials, to the design of the piping

system and to important installation details. Further research and

education are needed for the general application of performance evaluation

methodology as a basis for wider and more uniform acceptance of the

above-mentioned thermoplastics as well as other materials for plumbing

piping. However, the results of this study can be useful in expediting

the systematic performance evaluation of future innovative piping

materials

Key Words: Acoustical performance (plumbing piping); fire performance

(plumbing piping); plumbing performance evaluation (piping);

structural performance (thermoplastic plumbing piping);

/ thermoplastic pipe usage (residential plumbing).
1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL STATEMENT

This report describes a study on thermoplastic piping for water supply and

drainage for residential buildings, conducted for the Office of Policy

Development and Research, Division of Energy, Building Technology and

Standards, Department of Housing and Urban Development by the Center for

Building Technology, National Bureau of Standards. The objective, scope

and approach are described in Sections 1.3 and 1.4.

1
The study involved literature review, laboratory testing and the development

of comment by a number of authorities on codes, standards, design/installation

and manufacturing. This final report summarizes the significant findings

previously reported in greater detail and interprets the results in the context

of performance evaluation methodology for innovative materials and the

practical application of this concept.

1.2 BACKGROUND MP THEORY OF PERFORMMCE EVALUATION

Most of the present standards for piping materials describe and measure

the physical properties of the specific material, and are utilized primarily

for quality control in the manufacturing process. Generally, such product

standards provide the type of requirements and tests also needed by specifiers

and purchasers to describe the product and to determine whether a particular

lot of pipe and fittings actually complies with the relevant specifications.

However, in most instances, these product standards do not define, under

conditions of use, direct measures of the probable functional, health/safety,

and durability performance of installed assemblies of pipes and fittings

in relation to the material characteristics. This lack of end-use performance

criteria has not been recognized as a serious shortcoming in establishing

acceptance where ample time was available for the accumulation of a considerable

body of data on (1) the physical and chemical properties of the material

as determined by the quality control type of tests, and (2) service history

from field trials. This traditional approach has been useful in helping

ensure durability, but has retarded the development and acceptance of

innovative materials because of the long period of time required to establish

acceptance. For this reason, performance evaluation methods are needed

that are generally applicable to any material irrespective of its composition.

These methods should include short term tests or other suitable procedures

for obtaining realistic estimates of the adequacy of performance over the

reasonable life expectancy of the proposed installation. The term "performance"

used in this context means the degree of satisfaction of the basic user needs

for hydraulic and pneumatic functional adequacy, for health and safety,

and for durability and maintainability. Thus, a viable performance

evaluation methodology for innovative materials must include test

procedures that effectively simulate critical effects of the service

2
GO

O

<

I

GO

s

O

B

!5

CO

s

o

1

s

o

CO

^ ^ ^

CO

o

5

o

ULJ a.

<

s

a

5

^1C/3 S

ii

CO CD

UJ <

O < 1 o

o

p— I—

I

iii

< o

pi < CO

<^ UJ

Q m ^

S h= S

&y

^

<

§ ^

s I ^ -

UJ ~ ^

>- o ;^ E3 s= CD

CO

s

CD

•;5B

1

49>

§ I
LU "3 LU

O

O uJ QD

g

"J o ^ = ^ CO CJ S Q <

>-

QC<^ 00

CO <O

OC CO Q- -J Q_ < < ^ a<

QC

C/3 Oa.2 0 0OC 0

LL. QC

LU

>- QQC0 QC 1—V3

LU>

nz CO

1— LU <

LU > QC

cc 1—

LU00

aLU OC> <£

LU 0 o

COoLUo

LU<

QLUo<

CO<CX3 LU

QQO

=3OIECOo

S2oUJo

CJ ^ 1 ^ O C3

U- LU OC S ^ OC

LU ^ = C/D

>- QQ

<£ LU

«-3 I4. os

raEE

CM»S

en

g

a o

I— 5 CO t= CO —

UJ CO QQ S ^ ^ ^ § CD 4
g CO

CO o

CO

CO

ION CAL

ORY ENTAT

ORETI < HE

BOR

Ir

Ldi

iNDT

ESEAi <I X

LU

o

5

o

o

h- —I O O

QC QC

Q- »— O CD

< a Q »— S

CDo

<

zo

o

CO

>

a>u

e

CDE

kie

CO

5
environment. This implies a need for correlation between the results of

the short-term tests and long-term performance in service. This

will be referred to as the dilemma of durability evaluation. Figure 1 summarizes the basic needs in developing and implementing the performance

approach

The dilemma of durability evaluation is depicted in Figure 2. Regardless

of whether the traditional or the performance approach is used, the

acceptance decision involves some judgment, particularly where laboratory

tests or field trials show measurable degradation of one or more essential properties or performance characteristics. Figure 3 depicts a broad approach to performance evaluation, showing the basic elements of

performance evaluation and its implementation. For a more detailed

discussion of the performance approach for water supply and drainage

for buildings, and for a bibliography on performance concepts, criteria

and standards, the reader is referred to recent papers [1, 2, 3].'''

The widespread use of performance-type standards would not eliminate

the necessity for product standards. The use of specification-type

standards must continue as a means for assuring uniform quality and for

identification of the product. Also, in the perfection of performance

tests, the traditional quality control type of tests could be useful

in determining some of the general properties of the new materials

and components. In establishing meaningful performance tests, it

might also be necessary to conduct additional special tests to study

the properties of the system in which the materials and components

might be used.

The traditional metal piping used in the construction of plumbing

systems may no longer provide the most economical and satisfactory

long range solution for all residential plumbing systems.

6 Numbers in brackets refer to the list of references in Section 7.

6
There appears to be a trend to larger components and prefabricated

or factory assembled systems to speed on-site construction and reduce

cost. Contributing to this trend, and to increase usage of thermoplastic piping are considerations relating to convenience of manufacture

and assembly as affected by the properties of the materials used.

Improved evaluation methodology is needed as an aid in determining

vAiether innovative materials will be satisfactory throughout the

planned lifetimes of the systems and components in which they are used. Because piping systems of traditional materials have been

generally acceptable, there is a strong tendency to evaluate new

materials by comparing some of the favorable properties of the traditonal

materials with the corresponding properties of the new materials. This

approach can exclude from consideration some of the favorable properties

of the new materials that should be considered in the design of a piping

system using such materials. Such an approach restricts the scope of

the evaluation and may be misleading to the extent of unwarranted exclusion

of innovative materials and methods. Of course, the real concern should

be whether or not the performance of the plumbing system, as installed,

satisfies essential user needs and whether or not it provides the

durability appropriate to the system and its intended functions.

Performance requirements and performance criteria for satisfactory

systems need to be identified first. Then, evaluative techniques may

be developed systematically to determine the adequacy of the performance

of the new materials under typical end use conditions as parts of a plumbing system. The materials with which this study has been primarily

2 concerned are: (1) acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) and

(2) polyvinyl chloride (PVC) , both used where plastics are approved

for drain, waste and vent (DWV) systems, but PVC to a lesser extent than

o ABS, and (3) chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC) more recently

introduced for use in hot and cold water distribution systems where

plastics are approved for this application.

These and other acronyms and terms have been defined in the Appendix,

Section 8.1.

7
Piping of thermoplastic materials exhibits characteristics different

from piping constructed of the traditional metallic materials. Some

of these characteristics yield advantages, but others may lead to

difficulties if appropriate account is not taken of them.

Any thermoplastic material, by definition, softens if its temperature

is raised above some characteristic value; this value is much lower

than the temperature needed to soften any of the traditional metallic

materials. Within the piping structure when thermoplastic materials

are used, there is greater movement under dynamic hydraulic and thermal

loading and, in addition, there may be some relatively small but measurable

long term change in dimensions. Plastic piping is highly resistant

to corrosion of types that frequently attack metals, but some thermoplastics

have exhibited environmental stress cracking and chemical attack

in tests simulating what seem to be extreme service conditions

for residential plumbing. Because the thermoplastics being used for

plumbing piping may decompose when exposed to fire, the presence of

toxic combustion products in buildings fires and the possible effect

on fire spread should be taken into account in design and installation.

Thermoplastics may be cut, scratched or abraded by sharp, hard objects

more readily than the traditional metals, but the tools and expertise

needed to avoid such potential damage during installation and maintenance

are now generally available.

An attractive feature of thermoplastic piping is its light weight which

reduces structural loads and makes for convenient fabrication and

erection. However, care must be given to supporting the piping and

to providing clearances since, compared to metal pipe, where these

characteristics are ignored the greater movements under hydraulic

and thermal loads can create acoustical problems from pipe impact or from localized contact with the building structure. Recommendations

have been developed on design and installation details that make it

possible to avoid significant acoustical problems. See the Appendix,

Section 8.3.

8
Care in supporting thermoplastic pipe is required because of the tendency

of the pipe to deflect when exposed to hot water. If the pipe is not

adequately supported and adequate provisions are not made to accommodate

the expansion, contraction and long term dimensional changes that may occur in response to thermal loading, then two potential problems may

arise: (1) change in drainage slope and (2) unusual stress loadings

which are difficult to predict. However, the information and expertise

exists to prevent or minimize such difficulties with the current

materials. See the Appendix, Section 8.3.

In specifying any innovative piping material, the service conditions

that are anticipated should be carefully evaluated in relation to its

particular properties. For example, damage might occur in laboratory

experimentation in which high concentrations of certain drain cleaning

agents or other chemicals remain in contact with thermoplastic piping

for unusually long periods of time without dilution or flushing out with

water. However, because these conditions are unlikely to occur in

actual residential use, they need not be given much weight in the

selection of a material. For detailed information on chemical substances

that might affect thermoplastics under some conditions, the reader is

referred to an earlier report [4] and to industry literature referenced

in the appendix of the present report, Section 8.3.

A considerable technology has evolved since the first polyvinyl chloride

(PVC) compounds were developed by German technologists in the 1930' s and

since the advent of the thermoplastic pipe industry in the United States in

the late 1940' s. There has been a gradual improvment in important

properties and material consistency through research, quality control

and product standards. Improvements in these areas and in design and

installation standards for particular applications have led to an increase in its acceptance by designers, contractors, and building code

officials. See Section 2 for a review of usage and acceptance.

9
Instances of faulty performance and of reluctance in acceptance,

when thermoplastics were first introduced, may have been related

or more of several factors:

particularly

to one

(1) Plastics, a generic term, refers to large number of materials

whose compositions and characteristics were not well known, and

whose advantages and limitations for typical installations were

not understood by residential plumbing system designers and

installers.

(2) In the environment of the plumbing system, the representative temperature range and its effect on thermoplastics were not well known.

(3) The system characteritsics of expansion and contraction,

deflection and change in slope, and the consequential

requirements for jointing and support were not sufficiently

well defined and documented for practical application by

designers, installers and inspectors.

(4) The potential fire hazard and the potential smoke and toxic

gas hazard were not considered. This may have been related to

the fact that the early trials in residential plumbing applications

were made in one and two story single family detached dwellings

not fire-rated by the building codes, and to the fact that

the added fire load due to plastic piping is small in relation

to wood, furniture and other combustibles normally present

in a house.

(5) The matching of material properties to user requirements could

not be done systematically because of lack of specific knowledge

needed to establish meaningful correlation between the test

requirements of the product standards and the service performance

essential to satisfy user needs.

10
1.3 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE

As a part of the HUD long range research program for improving building

standards and performance evaluation methodology, a broad general task

was sponsored for NBS to develop performance criteria for piping materials

for use in residential plumbing systems. Because of the constraints

of time and costs, the laboratory work was limited to thermoplastic

materials. Initially the items of interest were: "thin-wall" PVC

drain-waste-vent systems constructed in accordance with criteria for

"single-stack" drainage, and water distribution systems of CPVC

.

The findings on single-stack drainage, an issue not significantly related

to the properties of materials, have been reported separately [5]

and hence will not be discussed here. "Schedule 40" ?VC and ABS DWV

and "thin-wall" PVC DWV piping materials were evaluated in laboratory

tests, and tests were made on CPVC water distribution piping materials.

Some measurements were made of the thermal properties of polybutyleae (PB)

materials, also.

The principal objectives of this study were as follows:

To describe the current status of standards for, and of the usage

of, thermoplastic piping, particularly for residential, above

ground plumbing.

To identify some of the technological parameters that are involved in the development of viable performance criteria

for piping materials. The emphasis was on the limited number

of widely used thermoplastics, and on performance characteristics

considered important for them.

3. To present a rationale and format for application of performance

concepts in standards for piping in general, and, as an illustrative

example, to develop a number of specific performance criteria

for above ground residential plumbing piping of thermoplastics.

11
In this study, undertaken some time ago, thermoplastics were taken as examples of "innovative" materials because they had been more recently

introduced for residential plumbing than the traditional metals.

However, at the present time they have been in widespread use for

a sufficient length of time to have permitted the accumulation of a significant body of service history. Because of the present wide

usage of some thermoplastics for residential plumbing (e.g., PVC,

ABS, PE, and to a lesser degree, CPVC), these particular materials

are no longer considered "innovative" in most code jurisdictions,

at least not for single family dwellings. However, because metallic

piping has been used for a much longer period of time, and because

of the present existence of some residual code limitations on the

general use of thermoplastic piping for residential plumbing, it

is helpful to utilize thermoplastics in the report for illustrating

a suggested approach to the development of generally applicable

performance evaluation methodology for innovative piping materials.

This report refers to a number of current model codes, and to voluntary

product (quality control) standards for thermoplastic pipe and fittings.

The years of issue of codes, standards and specf ications referred

to herein are not generally given; however, in each instance the

applicable date may be taken as the most recent issue date of the

code, standard or specification prior to the publication date of

this report. Also, publications are referenced that provide industry

recommendations and technical data on design and installation, on

use limitations, and on physical and chemical properties of selected

thermoplastic piping materials. A brief summary is provided in this

report describing the results of laboratory tests made by NBS as a part of the study, and separately reported in greater detail [6-9].

Section 5 of the report presents performance statements for piping

materials, taking into account some of the properties of thermoplastics

for illustrative purposes. Had the properties of other materials

been considered in detail, it probably would have been necessary

12
to develop different criteria or test methods to address the properties

that determine essential performance for those materials.

Concluding comments are given concerning the present suitability of

thermoplastic piping for above ground residential plumbing, and the

status of performance evaluation methodology for thermoplastic

piping materials. Also, conclusions are presented concerning needs

and approaches for the improvement of performance evaluation methodology

applicable to any piping material.

1.4 APPROACH

Several studies were conducted in this program for investigation of

performance characteristics considered especially relevant for thermoplastics piping. This final report presents in summary the results

of these studies, with updating of selected topics.

The approach adopted was to review the state-of-the-art for its

adequacy in terms of performance concepts and performance standards,

to formulate the qualitative content of needed performance statements,

and to devise and conduct a number of laboratory tests to provide

a basis for test procedures and for quantification of the criteria

included within the performance statements.

13

i. CURRENT STATUS OF THE USAGE OF THERMOPLASTIC PIPING FOR RESIDENTIAL

PLUMBING

2.1 APPLICATION OF THERMOPLASTICS IN PLUMBING SYSTEMS

A great variety of thermoplastic materials is theoretically possible

depending on the chemical composition of the polymer, and on manufacturing

conditions. Some of the determinant factors for application of these

materials in plumbing systems are the temperatures where softening occurs,

structural strength and dimensional stability, resistance to typical

exposure to household chemicals, and cost to manufacture, fabricate and

install

.

15
Because a number of the properties of thermoplastics materials are significantly different from those of the traditional metals, the methodologies

for design, specification, fabrication, installation, and cost calculation

must take these differences into account.

This report is limited primarily to the consideration of the suitability

PVC, ABS, and CPVC for residential plumbing and of their acceptance in

plumbing codes. The most common uses of thermoplastic piping materials

in residential plumbing systems are the following:

Acrylonitrile - Butadiene - Styrene (ABS) : for yard piping and

water service outside the building and for DWV systems.

Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) : for yard piping and water service outside

the building, and for DWV systems.

Chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC) : for hot and cold water

distribution within buildings; not widely used until recently, but

now increasing in acceptance for this use. Polybutylene (PB) : for hot and cold water distribution within buildings,

• • 3 recently accepted for this use by some approval authorities.

Polyethylene (PE) : for yard piping and water service outside the

building.

The usage of thermoplastic piping has greatly increased, as may be seen from the following values (of shipments) contained in AID Report [10]

published in 1969 and supplemented by data from Department of Commerce

Current Industrial Reports Series M30F [11]: in 1948, 0.5 million

dollars; in 1957, 50 million; in 1967, 187 million, and 1972, 548 million

dollars. Department of Commerce Current Industrial Report Series

MA-30D(74)-1 [12] gives the following information for 1973 and 1974:

A 1976 survey by the Domestic Engineering Journal (DE/Journal)

showed significant numbers of approvals also for house-main water

lines (water service).

16
Value of Shipments and Quantity of Resins Consumed for

Thermoplastics Pipe, Fittings and Unions

Value of Shipments ($1,000) Quantity of Resins (1,000 lbs)

1973 1974 1973 1974

563, 608 699,569 1,368,038 1,341,636

The above figures evidently include thermoplastics pipe and fittings

for all construction applications. Because of changes in sampling,

the Department of Commerce reports Series MA-30D for 1975 and 1976

do not give product data comparable to that of 1973 and 1974.

Approximately two-thirds of the thermoplastic piping produced in

the United States is used for water supply and distribution (including

community and municipal systems) and for DWV piping. Figure 4 illustrates

the proportions for pipe in the 1972 production of 1458 million

pounds. Comparable data for the years 1973 and later were not found.

The 1975 Annual Report of the National Sanitation Foundation reported

that 1975 production of thermoplastics pressure pipe and fittings

for potable water was 621 million pounds, and that 1975 production of

thermoplastics drain-waste-vent pipe and fittings was 258 million

pounds for a total of 879 million pounds for pressure and DWV

applications. The Department of Commerce Industrial Report Series

M30F (73)-13 [11] reported 1,018 million pounds (value 409 million

dollars) for 1973, and 924 million pounds (value 375 million dollars)

for 1972. Because of probable differences in sampling, these

different sources may not yield comparable data.

The generally increasing use of thermoplastic piping, particularly as indicated by the DE/ Journal surveys, can be attributed in large measure

to the improvements in manufacturing techniques which have created

materials with greater impact strength, greater resistance to heat distortion,

and improved consistency in the product. Continuing standardization and

17
Figure 4. Production in the United States during 1972 of

Thermoplastic Pipe, Tube and Fittings, identified by End Use.

18
educational programs by manufacturers, and an Increasing acceptance

by designers, contractors and plumbing code administrators through a greater understanding of thermoplastic piping technology have also

contributed to this growth.

2.2 CODE APPROVALS

In the 1960's thermoplastic piping for residential plumbing systems

lacked widespread acceptance by American code authorities because

metallic piping was already proven, acceptable and available, whereas

thermoplastic piping was unproven in this application and many designers

and installers lacked the knowledge, experience and initiative to utilize

it properly. But gradually a body of supporting data has been accumulated,

so that in the past few years the material has been increasingly accepted

for various applications. Annual surveys by the Domestic Engineering

Journal (DE/Journal) [13-16] have reported that either acrylonitrilebutadiene-styrene (ABS) or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) (usually both) has

received increasing approval for drain, waste and vent (DWV) use in

single family housing construction: 92% (of the municipalities

participating in the survey) in 1976, 94% in 1975, 86% in 1974, 86%

in 1973, 77% in 1972, 71% in 1971, 50% in 1970 and 25% in 1969.

In addition, it was reported (in 1976) that PVC was permitted by

80% of local codes for DWV in low-rise apartments and 52% in high-rise

apartments. The comparable figures for ABS in apartments were 80%

and 50%, respectively.

The increase in the number of approvals of plastic pipe is a reflection

of the changes being made in the model codes upon which many local

codes are, among other things, based. In the 1973 survey [13] code

authorities were requested to indicate whether or not their plumbing

code was based on or identical with any of the model codes. From

the replies to a questionnaire sent to more than 2,500 jurisdictions,

the following results were obtained:

19
Model Code Percentage of jurisdictions

with codes "based on or identical"

to model code

NSPC (National Standard Plumbing 30

Code)

UPC (Uniform Plumbing Code) 22

SPC (Standard Plumbing Code) 17

BPC (Basic Plumbing Code) 15

Acceptance of thermoplastic piping for water supply is more limited

than for DWV piping, according to these surveys. Where allowed for

water distribution within the building, it is more often than not

restricted to CPVC and when allowed underground outside the building

line, (e.g. for the water service pipe) PE is frequently used.

Other plastic piping material such as PB (polybutylene) and PP (polypropylene) have recently been allowed in some applications according to

Domestic Engineering Journal, and may become more widely used for residential

plumbing when and if the economic factors become favorable and additional

satisfactory field performance history is accumulated. In the 1976 survey,

[16] 47% of the jurisdications allowed CP^C for hot/cold water distribution

piping, 12% allowed PP, and 11% allowed PBa From the same survey,

i,/t was learned that 47% allowed CPVC, 31% PP and 27% PB for house-main

water lines.

Table 1 provides a summary of the current extent of approval (by

city codes) of several types of plastic pipe for water and DWV systems. I

I

'

20
TABLE 1. THERMOPLASTIC PIPING USES AUTHORIZED BY LOCAL PLUMBING

CODES: 1976 AND 1977. (EXCERPTS FROM TABULATIONS OF

SURVEY RESULTS OBTAINED BY DOMESTIC ENGINEERING

JOURNAL (DE/ JOURNAL) AND PRINTED IN THE MARCH, 1976

AND MARCH 1977 ISSUES [16]

Drain-Waste -Vent lines :

PVC DWV ABS DWV

1976 1977 1976 1977

Single-family homes

Low-rise apartments

High-rise apartments

Commercial buildings

92% 97% 92% 95%

81% 83% 75% 80%

52% 66% 50% 51%

59% 59% 59% 58%

House Sewer Lines ;

Schedule 40 PVC

Schedule 40 ABS

ASTM D-3034 PVC

1976 1977

62% 67%

59% 70%

44% 51%

House-Street Water Lines :

Commercial-grade 47% 34%

polyethylene

Premium grade 53% 46%

polyethylene

Chlorinated PVC 46% 48%

Polypropylene 31% 44%

Polybutylene 27% 42%

Hot/Cold Water Distribution

Lines

Chlorinated PVC 47% 48%

Polypropylene 12% 16%

Polybutylene 11% 19%

21
Table 2 summarizes the allowable uses of thermoplastics piping in

water supply and sanitary drainage systems for residential plumbing,

as recommended by the leading model codes and the HUD Minimum Property

Standards

Regulatory agencies that have approved the use of thermoplastics

piping for plumbing have sometimes imposed limitations, e.g., height,

location, type of waste, type of occupancy, fire rating of building,

pipe wall thickness, special installation rules, special test requirements,

combustibility, etc. Generally, regulatory agencies require that

the products meet stated standards, and that design and installation

conform to manufacturers' recommendations and generally accepted

practice

22
Table 2. ALLOWABLE USES OF THERMOPLASTIC PIPING MATERIALS FOR RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING SYSTEMS, AS RECOMMENDED

BY SEVERAL AUTHORITIES (1)

AUTHORITY MATERIAL (2)

USE (1,2) POTABLE WATER PIPING

SERVICE DISTRIBUTION

UNDER

SLAB OTHER

SANITARY DRAIN, WASTE AND VEMT

PIPING

BELOW

GROUND

ABOVE GROUND

SANITARY

BUILDING SEWER

Uniform

Plumbing Code

(UPC) a/ 1976

ABS

CPVC

FVC

PVC thin wall(4)

Polybutylene

Polyethylene

Styrene Rubber

NA

NA

ANA

AANA

NA

NA

NANA

NA

NANA

NA

NA

A(5) NA

A(5)

A(5) NA

A(3)

A(3) NA

NANA

NA

A(3)

A(3) NANA

NA

NA

ANANA

NA

NA

National

Standard Plumbing Code

(NSPC) 1/

1975

ABS

CPVC FVC

PVC thin wall (4) Polybutylene

Polyethylene

Styrene Rubber

ANA

NA

ANA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

ANA

NANA

A

ANA

NANA

NA

ANA

NA

NANA

Standard Plumbing Code

(SPC) SJ 1975

ABS

CPVC PVC

PVC thin wall(4)

Polybutylene

Polyethylene

Styrene Rubber

A

AA

NA

A

ANA

NA

NA

NA

NANA

NA

NA

NA

ANA

NA

ANA

NA

ANANA

NA

NA

ANANA

NA

NA

ANA

NA

NANA

Basic Plumbing Code

(BPC) s7

1975

ABS

CPVC

PVC

PVC thin wall(4)

Polybutylene

Polyethylene

Styrene Rubber

ANA

A

ANA

NA

NA

NA

A

NA NA NA

ANA

NA

NANA

Minimum

Property

Standards

(MPS) 1' 1977

ABS

CPVC

PVC

PVC thin wall (4) Polybutylene

Polyetl^lene

Styrene Rubber

A(6)

A(6) NA

A

A(5) NA

NA A(6) A(8)

A(7) A NA A(6) A(8) NA NA NA

A(7) A A NA A(6) NA

NA NA A(5)

A(8)

A(8)

AANA

NA

A = Acceptable NA = Not Acceptable = Not Detennined or not Applicable

Notes: (1) Uses for condensate piping and storm water piping are not covered in this table.

(2) Must conform to applicable standards of approving authority.

(3) In residential buildings not over 2 stories in height.

(4) Defined by ASTM D2949 (3" diam)

.

(5) Outside dwelling only.

(6) For. cold water only, outside dwelling or in unfinished basement or crawl space.

(7) Install without joints in or under slab floors.

(8) Applications limited to buildings not over six (6) floors in height, except that ABS or PVC may be used for horizontal branches in buildings of any height.

a/ Promulgated by International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (lAPMO)

.

b/ Promulgated by National Association of Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors (NAPHCC) and

the American Society of Plumbing Engineers (ASPE)

.

c/ Promulgated by Southern Building Code Congress International (SBCC)

.

Promulgated by Building Officials and Code Administrators International (BOCA),

e/ Promulgated by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

23

3. SUMMARY OF ma LAbUKATORY bTUDiEb

3.1 THERMAL PROPERTIES

3.1.1 Objective and Approach

The objective of the NBS work on thermal properties of plastic

piping used in housing [8,9] was to investigate the sensitivity of

several properties of the materials (in the form of the finished

product) to temperature changes, and to provide a basis for

recommended tests and performance criteria.

25
The approach taken was to measure selected properties as affected

by changing temperature or by exposure to a given elevated temperature

for various periods of time. These properties were some of those that

should be reasonably stable in order to maintain design dimensions and

strength over a long period of time, characteristics that are considered

important to user needs such as leak resistance, drainability and

hydraulic capacity. Among the material properties considered were glass transition temperature, hardness, impact resistance and permanent

dimensional change on exposure to heat.

3.1.2 Scope

Measurements relating to glass transition were made on specimens of

CPVC pressure tube from two manufacturers, PVC pressure pipe from

one manufacturer, PB pressure tube from two manufacturers, PVC drainwaste-vent pipe from four manufacturers, and ABS drain-waste -vent pipe

from four manufacturers.

Measurements of hardness as affected by temperature change were made

on specimens of CPVC, PVC, ABS and PB. Izod impact resistance and

hardness were also compared for these materials.

Irreversible dimensional changes from oven heating were determined

for PVC and ABS drain-waste-vent pipe.

3.1.3 Test Procedures

1. Glass transition . A DuPont TMA apparatus'^ was utilized for

determination of glass transition temperature, "residual stress

indicator" and coefficient of linear expansion. The apparatus and

test procedure have been described previously [8]. The procedure

involves the measurement of the vertical displacement of a loaded

probe of specified size and shape as a function of temperature,

^ Reference to this apparatus does not indicate NBS endorsement, nor does it imply that apparatus of other manufacture could not be

used for this purpose.

26
time and weight when the temperature is raised slowly at a specified

rate

.

The glass transition temperature was taken as that temperature at

which the first significant sudden change occurred in the probe

position as the temperature was slowly increased. The residual

stress indicator was calculated from the maximum upward displacement

of the probe (before onset of apparent penetration) and the original

sample thickness.

2. Hardness . The standard type D Durometer for flat specimens

was adapted for use with pipe specimens maintained at a desired

temperature by circulating water. This method was used for determination

of hardness and hardness-temperature coefficient [9],

This method is based on the penetration of a specified indentor

forced into the test specimen under specified conditions. The indentation

hardness is inversely related to the penetration. The method permits

measurements of either initial indentation or of indentation after

a period of time.

3.2 FIRE SAFETY

3.2.1 Objective and Approach

The objective of the work on the fire performance of selected walls

and chases containing DWV plumbing systems was to obtain data, under

specific, controlled test conditions, on parameters similar to those

that determine acceptability of walls and chases not containing

plumbing. The principal questions that led to the conduct of the

fire tests were:

1. Will the plastic DWV system compromise the generally

accepted fire endurance ratings for constructions not containing

plumbing?

27
2. Will the burning of the plastic piping make a significant

contribution to life hazard due to the release of smoke and toxic

gases?

The approach used was to apply the generally accepted ASTM E119

standard fire endurance test [17] insofar as applicable. Measures

of performance taken into account in the laboratory work included

fire spread, temperature rise and concentration of smoke and toxic

gas in wall and chase assemblies. No flame spread tests [18] were made in this study.

The fire endurance rating of a wall or chase assembly is the time

period over which the assembly is expected to act as a fire barrier

to prevent the spread of fire from one room to another. The spread

of fire may be due to the passage of flame or hot gases, excessive

temperature rises, or structural collapse. There has been increasing

evidence in recent years of the need to also consider limiting smoke

and toxic gases coming into rooms adjacent to the fire.

3.2.2 Scope

Ten full scale fire tests were made involving 39 different combinations

of building or plumbing construction configurations and materials [6].

Tests were made with metallic DWV systems as well as with PVC and

ABS plastic DWV systems. Both chase and wall constructions were involved in the study.

3.2.3 Test Procedures

The essential features of the standard fire endurance test for

walls and chases [17] were applied in these tests. The procedure

involved the construction of the test wall or chase as one enclosure

of a gas fired furnace, and the operation of the furnace in a manner

so as to produce temperatures within the furnace in accordance with

the standard ASTM Ell 9 time-temperature curve. Temperatures were monitored with chrome 1 -a lumel thermocouples at various points on

the surfaces of the pipes and fittings, in the air inside the drainage

28
stacks and on the surfaces of the walls and chases. Gas concentrations

in the wall cavities were measured by several techniques at a point

one foot above the lowest fixture branch. An anemometer was used

for measuring the upward flow of air induced in the stacks by the

fire. At regular intervals cotton pads were placed near the

unexposed surfaces to test for possible ignition from the passage

of hot gases through cracks or openings.

The test criteria adopted for this study called for conformance to

the following requirements during a 60 minute period at exposure

to the standard time-temperature curve:

1. There should be no passage of flame or hot gases through

the wall assembly containing the DWV installation that would result

in the ignition of the cotton pad.

2. The temperature rise on the unexposed surface of the

assembly containing the DWV installation should not exceed 181°C

(325**F) at any measured point. The temperatures recorded on the

laterals (fixture traps or trap arms) are not regarded as wall

surface temperatures.

3. Large quantities of smoke should not pass through the

unexposed face. This last criterion has not been defined in quantitative

terms but was based on observations during the test that indicated when

heavy smoke was seen to be issuing from the construction.

The above three criteria were used to judge the extent to which the wall

assembly tested had met the requirements for the one hour fire endurance.

No hose stream tests (optional in ASTM E 119) were conducted and no tests were made under conditions simulating fires in high-rise buildings.

3.2.4 Findings

Detailed findings in the NBS tests have been reported [6]. From this

work, the following statements are made:

29
1. The PVC DWV systems with 4-inch stacks and 1-1/2-inch

laterals in 20-inch by 20-inch chases met the criteria for 60 minutes

fire endurance. The annular openings around the laterals were sealed

with plaster spackling compound for these tests. Although not tested,

it appears likely that a similar ABS installation would also meet the

test criteria.

2. The one hour, fire rated walls containing ABS and PVC pipe

with back-to-back laterals in line with the stack met the 60 minute

criteria when all of the following conditions were satisfied:

a. Hie annular openings around the laterals were sealed.

b. The wall cavity depth was 5-1/2 in or more (No tests were made with 3 1/2 in cavity depth and offset laterals. The

tests with 3 1/2 in cavity depth and back-to-back laterals were made with the fittings penetrating the wall membranes).

c. The stack was limited to 2-or 3-in diameter. A 4-in diameter

PVC stack in a 9-1/2-in deep wall cavity also met the criteria

when the annular opening around the lateral was sealed.

3. The fire endurance of the walls containing PVC or ABS pipe

with back-to-back laterals in line with the stack (without horizontal

offset) was reduced when any of the following conditions existed:

a. The drainage fittings (e.g., tees, wyes) penetrated the

gypsum board.

b. The annular hole around the PVC or ABS lateral was not sealed.

c. The PVC or ABS pipe was used in a 3-1/2-in deep wall cavity

with either wood or steel studs (see parenthetical statement

in 2(b) above for explanation).

4. Offsetting the lateral from the stack in the same stud space

for a 2" X 6" wood stud wall increased the time to flame passage.

However, when the annular openings around the lateral were not sealed,

a considerable quantity of smoke was released into the room at 34 minutes

and the ABS and PVC systems failed this criterion. When the lateral

was offset from the stack in an adjacent stud space, the heavy smoke

criterion was reached at 5 minutes and failure by flame through occurred

at 21 minutes. The effect of offsetting the laterals in 2" x 4" wood

or steel stud walls was not examined in these tests.

30
5. The performance of the PVC systems was superior to that of

the ABS systems, both in time to flame through and in time to heavy

smoke development in almost all the tests where a direct comparison was possible. These tests covered a variety of wall cavity depths and

stack sizes. Each comparison is based on the condition where the

opening around the lateral was completely sealed off with plaster

spackling. When the annular opening was not sealed, the performance

was difficult to compare since the times to failure were short for

both the PVC and ABS systems.

6. All copper, galvanized steel and cast iron systems installed

in wall cavities, a total of seven test assemblies, met the criteria

for 60 minutes in every case. In six tests, the openings around the

laterals were sealed, and in one test the opening around the lateral

was not sealed. The wall cavities in these tests were of three

depths: 3-1/2 in, 5-1/2 in, and 9-1/2 in. While the wall surface

temperature rise did not exceed 181°C (325°F) the temperature of

the copper lateral reached 500°C (932°F) just outside the wall.

7. Based on the results from this series of tests, plastic

DWV systems with lateral sizes of 2 inches or less would not be expected

to reduce the 1-hour fire endurance rating of wood stud and gypsum

board walls and chases in one and two story dwellings provided that:

a. the annular opening in the wall around the lateral is sealed

(an adequate inspection system may be required), and

b. the stud space depth or orientation of the fittings is

sufficient to obviate the need for the hubs of any fittings

in the vertical stack to penetrate the wall (no tests were made in this program with a wall cavity depth of 3 1/2 in

and without the fittings penetrating the wall membrane).

8. There was a quantitative difference in the fire performance

of ABS and PVC DWV systems. However, neither system degraded the one- hour fire rating of wood stud and gypsum board walls where the conditions of item 7 above were followed.

9. This investigation covered only the fire performance of DWV systems

in one-hour fire rated chases and walls. It did not address the fire

performance of DWV piping in "high rise" buildings nor DWV piping pene31
trating floor-ceiling assemblies. Further studies may be needed to

determine relative effects due to pressure differences from stack effect

in high rise buildings. Also, there is a need for developing a suitable,

reproducible procedure for quantitative measurements of smoke and gas

accumulation in unexposed dwelling spaces to the space containing the fire.

3.3 RESISTANCE TO INTERMITTENT HOT-WATER EXPOSURE AND SHOCK PRESSURE

(WATER HAMMER)

3.3.1 Objective and Approach

The objective of the work on resistance to intermittent exposure to

hot water was to examine the effects of a simulated service exposure

of an assembly of pipe and fittings. The information of principal

interest was the permanent change in dimensions and the continuity

of leak resistance.

The objective of the work on shock pressure was to examine the effects

of simulated "water hammer" on an assembly of pipe and fittings. The

information of principal interest was the ability of the assembly to

withstand, without leaking, repeated applications of shock pressure

for a sufficient number of times to represent the exposure anticipated

over the planned life of a residential water distributing system.

3.3.2 Scope

In the hot-water exposure test, measurements were made of dimensional

changes in 4 in "thin-wall" PVC DWV pipe (wall thickness approximately 0.131

in, a little thinner than SDR 32.5 as specified by ASTM D2241) and

in 1/2 in CPVC water tubing (ASTM D2846) as arranged in representative

assemblies. Cyclic exposui.3 to hot water (generally 140 - 150°F/60 -66°C)

flowing through the assemblies was provided for a little more than

1500 cycles for the water tubing and 750 cycles for the DWV pipe.

Lateral deflections and changes in length were monitored at a number

of places in the test assemblies, longitudial compressive forces were measured, and observations were made for evidence of leaking.

32
In the shock pressure test, measurements were made of the number

of cycles to failure (up to 350,000) of CPVC water tubing, as arranged

in a representative assembly. Failure in these destructive tests was indicated by rapid loss of pressure from bursting or significant

leaking. Tests were made at four different temperatures; 75°F (24°C),

120°F (49°C), 140°F (60°C) and ISO'^F (82°C). At each temperature,

the number of cycles-to-f ailure was determined at each of several

levels of peak pressure produced by the test apparatus.

3.3.3 Test procedures

1. Hot water exposure . Because there were no standard test methods

suitable for the purposes of this study, a special test was designed.

This is described in some detail in another report [7]. Essentially

the procedure involved exposure to flowing hot water for five minutes

at 1/2 hour intervals. The apparatus was designed so that the hot

water from a 52 gal water heater was delivered first to a test loop

of 1/2 in CPVC water tubing, next to a 4 in PVC DWV test stack assembly

from which it was discharged into a receptor, and finally returned to

the heater by a high-pressure pump. Two DWV test stacks were provided -

one with longitudinal expansion restraint devices spaced 9 ft (2.7 m)

apart, and the other with expansion fittings that permitted longitudinal

expansion without significant restraint. Four types of attachment

of the water tubing loop to a simulated floor joist structure were provided - two generally accepted methods and two improper methods.

The accepted constructions were (a) a 10 ft (3.0 m) straight

run of piping with only one end restrained and with loosely-fitting

intermediate non-metallic clamps so that longitudinal movement

was not restrained, and (b) a similar assembly of piping restrained

at both ends but having, in addition, an intermediate horizontal

offset that accomodated longitudinal expansion and contraction

through flexing at the offset section. This arrangement utilized

loosely fitting non-metallic clamps except at the fixed ends. The

improper constructions were (c) a 10 ft (3.0 m) straight run with

loosely fitting non-metallic intermediate clamps and end restraint

33
at both ends and (d) a 10 ft (3.0 m) straight run with tightly fitting

intermediate metallic clamps and end restraint at both ends.

The direction of flow through the water tubing test loop was reversed

alternately, the first exposure designated "clockwise" and the next

exposure "counterclockwise". The flow from the water tubing loop was delivered to one of the DWV stacks during the clockwise exposure

and to the other stack during the counterclockwise exposure.

Longitudinal forces generated by thermal expansion in the restrained

pipes were measured by load cells with a range of 500 lb f(2.224 x 10 N).

Surface temperatures and rises in surface temperatures were determined

with maximum /minimum recording surface temperature gages with a range

of 0°F to 270°F (-18°C to 132°C). Dimensional changes were determined

by graduated scales or calipers placed against fixed guide-pieces at

predetermined locations. Temperatures of the water were determined

with bimetallic-type dial temperature gages tapped into the flow

system at several points with a range of 30''F to 240^ (-1°C to 116**C).

Gage pressures were determined with bourdon-type dial gages with a range of 0 to 100 psi (0 to 689 kPa). Pressure differences for flowrate determination were measured with conventional water-over-mercury

manometers

Typically, measurements of dimensions and positions, as well as of

pressures, flow rate and temperatures, were made during the last one minute of the 5 minute flow period. Dimensional and position measurements

were also made at the beginning of the test before exposure to hot

water and, on occasion, during extended shutdown periods, and after

completion of the test. Changes in longitudinal forces in restrained

pipes were measured continuously during and for a short time after

the 5 minute flow period at several times during the test.

2. Shock pressure . A special test [7] was designed, because no suitable standard test method was available. The procedure involved

repetitive (frequency 2 Hz) exposure to a a pre-programmed pressure

34
rise of short (0.16s) duration, with the test assembly and the water

therein at a particular temperature. The assembly comprised two

7' - 10 1/2" (2.40 m) lengths of 1/2 in CPVC tubing (ASTM D2846)

joined with a fitting (90° elbow). The objective of the test was

to determine the number of exposures to a given shock pressure

that could be tolerated without failure of the pipe or fitting.

Various test pressures were selected, and the corresponding number

of cycles-to-failure for each pressure was determined. The number of

of cycles were counted up to 350,000 or until failure occurred.

Tests were made at temperatures of 75°F (14°C), 120°F (41°C),

140°F (60°C) and 180°F (82°C). A total of 65 specimens were tested.

The number of exposures (350,000) was selected on the basis that this

is a reasonable estimate of the number of occurrences of primary

shock pressure waves that might occur in the fixture supply pipe

to a household plumbing appliance, e.g. the hot-water supply pipe

to an automatic dishwashing machine, in a period of 50 years.

The pressure was generated by a piston, and measured with a pressure

transducer. A data acquisiton system was utilized that provided for

control of the piston position to maintain a pre-programmed pressure,

for counting the number of pressure pulses, for monitoring the

temperature and for indicating sudden loss of pressure (failure).

3.3.4 Findings

1. Hot water exposure . A report on a thermal cycle test of horizontal

PVC pipe [19] was reviewed. The author concluded that a realistic

limiting mid-span deflection for horizontal drainage pipe is s/48,

after exposure to 73,000 cycle of exposure to 180°F (82°C) water

(assumed to represent 50 years of service exposure), where s is the

distance between supports. This limit, compatible with the capabilities

of the 2 inch Scnedule 40 PVC pipe tested with 4 ft (1.2 m) support

spacing, was considered adequate to assure continuous positive slope

in nominally horizontal drains installed with the customary gradient

of one in 48. A review was also made of a British Standard that described

a thermal cycle test of a vertical PVC DWV stack assembly subjected to

35
2500 cycles of 91°C (196°F) water [20]. It was required that there

be no leaks in the assembly during and after the test, and that after

the test a ball 6 mm (1/4 in) less in diameter than the stack be

passed. This indicates a limiting decrease in diameter of about 6 percent

and a theoretical diametral difference of about 12 percent.

The NBS hot water test [7] produced the following results:

a. During 1500 cycles of exposure to water at an average temperature

of 144°F (62°C), the CPVC pressure piping assemblies developed

no leaks, either with recommended or non-recommended mounting

technique s

b. There were no practically significant changes in dimensions

of CPVC pressure piping assemblies, or of PVC DWV assemblies,

mounted in accordance with industry recommendations, either

during or following exposure to 1500 cycles of 144°F (62°C)

water (for the CPVC assemblies) and 750 cycles (for the

PVC assemblies). There was some evidence of a slight

permanent lengthening of the CPVC assemblies and a slight

permanent shortening of the PVC stacks, but the measurements

of this parameter were not considered sufficiently precise

to warrant meaningful numerical conclusions.

c. Thermal compressive stress measured in the CPVC and PVC assemblies

was far less than the usual hydrostatic tensile design stress

used for pressure rated pipe of comparable wall thickness

(ASTM D2846 and ASTM D2241).

2, Shock pressure. A review of the work of other investigators

[21, 22, 23] indicated that the equations for "water hammer" originally

developed for application to metal pipe are also applicable to

thermoplastic pipe if the appropriate mater ial -dependent coefficient is

used

36
One study [21] indicated that PVC 1120 160 psig^ rated pipe may be

expected to have a cyclic pressure life of the order of 250,000

to 1,000,000 cycles of peak pressure fluctuation from a static line

pressure of 50 psi (345 kPa) to 160 psi (1.10 MPa) (static pressure

plus shock pressure). The author recommended the consideration of

a cyclic pressure design basis in a fashion somewhat similar to the

customary static pressure design basis.

Another study [23] concluded that the present PVC pressure pipe is

suitable for use at its rated hydrostatic pressure in systems in which

flow velocities are limited to 5 fps (1.5 m/s). This study also

showed that theoretical shock pressures generated in PVC pipe are less than 50 percent of those in cast iron and asbestos cement,

for a given velocity.

The NBS shock pressure test on CPVC [7] showed capability to withstand

in excess of 350,000 cycles of peak pressure to 150 psi at ISO^F (82°C),

and that a fatigue life curve of peak pressure vs number of cycles

to failure can be established for a given test temperature. The test

procedure used in the NBS test should be considered in the development

of a standard test for shock pressure,

3.4 ACOUSTICS

Although no laboratory tests were made on the acoustics of plumbing

systems as a part of the particular investigation described herein,

considerable attention was given to the drafting of criteria for this

purpose. Familiarity and laboratory and field experience with the

test methods referred to in the Criteria had been obtained by NBS

staff previously, for example in Operation BREAKTHROUGH [24, 25].

In recent years, increasing interest in the control of noise in

plumbing systems has been expressed by consumers, engineers and

architects. Thus, acoustic criteria are considered an important

part of the performance requirements for piping in residential plumbing.

^ Pounds per square inch gage (pressure).

37

4. AN APPROACH TO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PIPING MATERIALS

4.1 STATUS OF TRADITIONAL METHODS OF EVALUATION

The existing methodology is characterized by two limitations,

insofar as the performance approach is concerned: (1) the standards

tend to describe the properties of pipes, tubes and fittings separately

(and are often written around the properties of the component materials),

rather than to define the performance required of the installed

assembly operating in the service environment (although a recent

trend to "system" standards has been noted: see Appendix, Section 8.2)

and (2) the standards tend to measure physical properties as related

39
primarily to the maintenance of uniform quality in production and to

identification of the product, rather than to the means for

predicting service performance of installed systems through performance

evaluation.

As stated in Section 1.1, this has not been recognized as a serious

shortcoming under the traditional acceptance procedure where a long

period of time has been available to complete the evolution of the

acceptance process for new materials (see Figure 2). But this slow

process needs a supplementary performance evaluation methodology if

acceptance decisions are to be reached more rapidly and systematically

and if innovation is to be encouraged rather than hindered.

4.2 USER NEEDS AND MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE

For a building component as thoroughly integrated into the building

system generally with minimum accessibility as the piping used for a plumbing system, the essential functional characteristics include not

only familiar characteristics such as leak resistance, drainability

and flow capacity, but also the more subjective and di f f icult-to-define

characteristics of acoustical acceptability and durability.

The development of performance test methods that are meaningful requires

first the conception of criteria that are related directly to user requirements that are important to the developer, builder, purchaser

and occupant, and then the establishment of a test method that

realistically simulates the chemical, mechanical, thermal, and

structural environment to which the piping is exposed in actual use. This involves careful analysis of the important processes of user

loads and of factors of degradation that are brought to bear on the piping system in service, and translation of this information

into the development of laboratory test procedures with equipment

that can be described definitively, and that can measure with suitable

reproducibility the effects of the simulated service exposures in

quantitative terms. The broad objective is to identify suitable

existing test methods wherever possible, and where there are no

40
suitable existing tests to introduce appropriate modifications in the

existing tests or to develop entirely new, performance-type tests.

In the development of performance tests as well as in the analysis and

interpretation of test data, panels of knowledgable specialists may

be needed to facilitate effective review and purposeful decision

making

.

In the absence of comprehensive statistical data on use conditions,

on the degradation of essential properties of materials in a service

environment, and on user expectations and tolerance levels, one practical approach to the establishment of performance levels is to

select levels that either upgrade, downgrade, or maintain existing

quality in the class of products in current use, based on the measured

performance of a sampling of contemporary products using performance

test procedures that measure key performance characteristics.

Decisions with respect to upgrading, downgrading, or maintained present

quality require the studied judgment of experienced persons acting

together. This need is illustrated by the great difficulty of

making realistic and meaningful decisions concerning comparability of

performance when inherent properties of materials being compared are quite different, as for plastics and metals. Required performance

levels established in this way would, of course, be subject to later

adjustment as more extensive service data and user reaction become

available. The ideal alternative, beginning with the collection

of comprehensive data on service conditions, installation detail, user response, etc. could be prohibitive in cost and practical difficulty.

The principal user requirements for the piping as installed in

plumbing systems can be classified in three major categories; (a) hydraulic

and acoustical functional adequacy, (b) adequacy for health and safety,

and (c) adequacy for durability/maintainability.

Functional performance is determined mostly by the following

attributes

:

41
(a) Resistance to leakage or bursting from service static pressure

and internal shock pressure.

(b) The provision of adequate drainability of nominally

horizontal pipes subjected to normal live and dead loads,

and to a normal thermal environment.

(c) The provision of adequate hydraulic /pneumatic carrying

capacity of the piping system subjected to normal thermal

and hydraulic exposure.

(d) The provision of acoustical acceptability under normal

operating conditions, taking into account noise reduction

between living units through interdwelling walls or floorceilings, noise reduction between spaces within a living unit

through space dividers, and maximum noise levels generated

in interior spaces during normal usage with typical

hydraulic loads.

Performance with respect to the requirements of health and safety

is determined largely by toxicological acceptability (non-transfer of

hazardous or toxic materials to potable water), by fire safety factors

(the spread of fire, smoke and toxic gases in building fires), and

by the potential for introducing harmful chemical solutes (from the

piping) into the waste discharge that are not normally removed in

waste water processing plants.

Durability and maintainability performance is determined by the

combination of physical properties, installation detail, and service

environment as they might be related to degradation of functional

performance of a piping system . Among the principal measures are:

(a) Resistance to the normal chemical environment sufficient to

guard against excessive chemically-induced changes in

strength or dimension under typical structural and thermal

load patterns within the plumbing system.

(b) Resistance to the effects of repetitive thermal and

structural loads, and of weathering and aging on the

stability of essential dimensions and strength, and on

42
the maintenance of leak resistance of the pipiTg itself

(including joints and connections to equipment) over

an extended period of service,

(c) Resistance to abrasion or cutting from pipe hangers, guides,

and supports; from typical contents transported in a normal service environment ; and from mechanical pipe

cleaning tools.

From the foregoing discussion, it can be seen that criteria for

piping in the context of performance involves pipes, fittings,

joints, and sometimes the structural interface. A knowledge of the

particulars of the service environment is needed to develop viable

performance criteria and evaluation methods.

4.3 FORMAT FOR PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

A framework is helpful in providing guidance both in the definition and

practical application of relevant portions of the existing evaluation

methodology from a performance standpoint, and in the development of

the more comprehensive performance evaluation methodology that is

needed. Although the present program is limited largely to specific

considerations believed most relevant to thermoplastics, the approach

might be applicable more broadly, with some expansion, to the

determination of adequacy of performance for other new piping materials.

The alternative for the evaluation of future innovative piping

materials is the traditional approach that requires a relatively long

period of trial and error together with the gradual accumulation of

satisfactory service history from trial installations as the basis

for general acceptance. In the case of thermoplastics for aboveground residential use, more than a quarter century of U.S. experience

has been required to approach this level of acceptance. A more

expeditious, systematic and reproducible evaluation procedure and an improved protocol for determining acceptance is needed, as illustrated

in Figure 3 (See page 5) and in Figure 5.

43
a

oc

LU

U.

U.o<o ^ o<

ocoo

CO

UJaLU

QC 2 zo UJ

»— h- < 1— UJ

_J

00 o

CO QC z UJC3 OuCOI O

QC

a.o Zo uu

a oLU h- UJ

UJ

a < *I

O

QC

O QC

UJ

n

Ou_

O< O

CO

UJoooc

DOES

NOT

CONFORM ooUJ

C3

CONFORMS o<

UJQC

=)aUJ

cc o

ocUJ

oc

03S

«)>

OSa»oBE

<t UJ < UJ =3 CO

C3 = < UJ

is

CO o

tj h- cc

=5 < => a S o O UJ UJ

a. o

UJ >- DC OC CO omws

can

UJ

_J ^ % ^ 2 QC O O

or

uj CO

44
Figure 6 shows a number of the key elements of performance evaluation

for piping materials. In this approach, the particular requirements

to be emphasized will depend on the application being considered, and

the measures of performance that are critical will depend on the

particular combination of performance characteristics and physical and

chemical properties of the materials being considered. For example,

fire spread might be a relevant measure for an assembly containing

materials that are subject to burning or pyro lysis such as thermoplastics,

but not necesarily so for an assembly of materials generally considered

non-combustible such as steel or cast iron. On the other hand, some

of the important measures for certain metals may be of little consequence

for some of the non-metals, for example electrolytic corrosion and blockage

attributable to corrosion processes.

Existing standards and other existing sources of information provide

some complete or at least partial performance statements, either stated

or implied. Unfortunately, however, this is not enough. In order

to facilitate an adequate review of existing information on performance

evaluation and to define residual research needs, some guides are needed.

Patterned after the general hierarchy depicted in Figure 6, a matrix

of the type shown in Table 3 can be helpful in the search for performance

statements and in the definition of resarch needs. Table 3 emphasizes

criteria applicable to non-metallic piping materials such as thermoplastics

these criteria could be suitability modified or expanded to address other

materials with different properties.

The criteria developed in the present study are presented in Section 5 in sequence, using the organizational scheme depicted in Figure 6 and

Table 3. The group of critiera for each attribute category is preceded

by a brief introductory discussion. Each criterion is followed by a statement identifying or describing the method of evaluation, or indicating

the absence of a suitable method. In instances where explanation or discussion is necessary or beneficial, a commentary is given that presents

the rationale for the criterion or for the method of evaluation, or

for both.

45
ATTRIBUTES

(BASIC USER NEEDS)

REQUIREMENTS

{t»HYSICAL INDICATORS OF

SATISFACTION OF USER NEED^)

MEASURES/CRITERIA

(PARAMETERS OR PROCESSES FOR

MEASUREMENT OF PERFORMANCE)

EVALUATION METHOD

(REPRODUCIBLE PROCEDURE TO

DETERMINE SATISFACTION OF

REQUIREMENTS)!

IMPLEMENTATION

0

0

0

FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

HEALTH AND SAFETY

DURABILITY AND MAiNTAINABILfTY

LEAK RESISTANCE

DRAINABILltY

HYDRAULIC CAPACITY

FIRE SAFETY

ETC.

DIMENSIONAL STABILITY

FIRE SPREAD

DEFLECTION/DISPLACEMENT

STRENGTH/INTEGRITY

DISCHARGE RATE

ETC.

DEFINITIVE PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL TEST

SYSTEMATIC INSPECTION PROCEDURE

GUIDELINES FOR JUDGMENT

PERFORMANCE STANDARD

ACCEPTANCE PROTOCOL

DESIGN/INSTLN. GUIDES

Figure 6. Classificatioli HIerachy for performance criteria

for piping ittttirials

46
TABLE 3. MATRIX: CRITERIA FOR PIPING MATERIALS

REQUIREMENTS

ATTRIBUTES

MEASURES

OR CRITERIA FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

ADEQUACY FOR

HEALTH, SAFETY ADEQUACY FCR DURABILITY, MAINTAINABILITY

Leak resistance A. 1.1

A. 1.2

Resistance to sustained pressure

Resistance to shock

pressure

Drainability

and hydraulic

capacity

A. 2.1

A. 2.

2

Beam/column deflection

and ring distortion

Continuity and smoothness of interior surfaces

Acoustical acceptability

Toxicological

acceptability

Fire safety

A. 3.1

A. 3.

2

A. 3.

3

A. 3.

4

A. 3.

5

B.1.1

B.2.1

B.2.2

B.2.3

Noise reduction between

living units, through

interdwelling walls

containing piping

Noise reduction between

living units, through

interdwelling floor- ceilings containing piping

Noise reduction between

spaces within a living

unit, through walls and partitions containing piping

Noise reduction between

spaces within a living unit,

through floor-ceilings con- taining piping

Noise level in interior spaces during operation of plumbing system

Elution of toxic substances

Fire Spread

Spread of smoke

and toxic gases

Flame spread

Retention of properties for essential functional performance

C.1.1

C.1.2

C.1.3

Long term stability &f dimensions and strength

(a) dimensional change

(b) strength reduction

Resistance to chemical attack and environmental

stress cracking

Resistance to abrasion and cutting

47
The criteria presented in this report are not concerned with plumbing

fixtures, appliances, or appurtenances, nor with characteristics that

do not depend on the properties of the piping materials in some manner.

The criteria are concerned with assemblages of pipes and fittings as utilized and installed in complete plumbing systems. The assemblages

must be addressed by the criteria because the performance of the piping

system can depend to a considerable extent on the interactions between

the pipes, fittings, supports, and attachments. Traditionally,

product standards have described some of the properties of pipes

and fittings, but not necessarily of the assemblages as installed

in plumbing systems.

The format adopted herein is intended to provide essentially a complete

performance statement within each unit. That is, the basic requirement,

the criterion and a method of evaluation are provided, along with

essential references and helpful commentary.

48
5. PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FOR THERMOPLASTIC PIPING

5.1 ORGANIZATION OF THE CRITERIA

The criteria are organized according to the matrix shown in Table 3,

with classification into the hierarchy categories of attribute,

requirement, and measure as shown in Figure 6. Table 3 is useful

in showing the relationships between the various criteria in

the classification system used, and their individual relationships

to the attributes, requirements, and measures. Most of the criteria

presented herein have been suggested as significant for thermoplastic

piping materials. If the criteria were to be expanded or modified

49
to apply to other classes

additional or alternative

have to be identified and

of materials

key measures

defined.

, it

and

is probable that

test procedures would

5.2 CRITERIA FOR FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

This group of criteria describes measures for assessing functional

performance without particular regard to safety or durability (See

Figure 6 and Table 3) . This is the type of performance that is

required to satisfy immediate user needs without necessarily considering

those properties of materials upon which the adequacy of functional:

performance at some later time might depend. Examples of functional

criteria for piping systms are leak resistance, hydraulic capacity and

noise level.

50
A. Attribute: FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

A.l Requirement: LEAK RESISTANCE

A. 1.1 Criterion: Resistance to Sustained Pressure

Representative assemblages of pipe and fittings shall withstand service

pressures over the temperature ranges that might be encountered in the

intended application without rupture or leakage of fluids from the

system. Temperatures shall be considered as follows:

Cold-water systems: 73.4°F (23°C)

Domestic hot-water systems: 180°F (82°C)

Special high-temperature, non-superheated, hot-water systems: 205°F (96°C)

Method of Evaluation for A. 1.1

The present ASTM D1598^ and D1599^ tests for long term and short-time

pressure testing used together appear sufficient for this requirement.

The apparatus and procedure for long-term testing are as specified

m 3 ASTM D2837 except that the test specimen shall consist of two

equal lengths of pipe joined with a fitting in accordance with the

recommendations of the pipe manufacturer. The evaluation shall be

performed with each type of fitting that might be used to join the

pipe for the application considered.

The temperature of the water within the test specimen during the

test shall be as stated in the Criterion, for the application considered.

The short-time burst strength for the assembly shall be as recommended

by the manufacturer.

j Time-to-Failure of Plastic Pipe Under Constant Internal Pressure,

j ASTM D1598 (ANS B72.6).

^ Short-Time Rupture Strength of Plastic Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings,

jl ASTM D1599 (ANS K65.53).

1 ^ Obtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Materials,

j ASTM D2837 (ANS K65.153).

51
Commentary on A. 1.1

Piping joining solvents, cements or other joining materials must

be compatible with the pipe so that cemented joints are adequately

tight to preclude leakage under service conditions or representative

hydrostatic/pneumatic tests. Chemical compatibility must be realized

to preclude joint leakage due to poor bond, or to chemical or aging

changes in the joining material or in the attached pipe, fitting,

or device. The means provided for joining pipe and fittings to

dissimilar materials should be such as to facilitate the maintenance

of leak-free connections under conditions of variable temperature

and pressure, and to facilitate disconnection or ready replacement

in the future, where this might be required. The joint system should be

appropriate to the particular piping material and the procedures

for preparing and making the joints should be based on the manufacturer's

recommendations. Product standards and industry publications provide

guidance in these matters (See Appendix, Sections 8.2 and 8.3).

Whether the method of ASTM D2837 is suitable for the treatment of

failure data on an assemblage of pipe and fittings has not been determined

in the present study. This question should be resolved, as it could

affect the practicability of the method of evaluation recommended.

52
A. Attribute: FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

A.l Requirement: LEAK RESISTANCE

A. 1.2 Criter ion: Resistance to Shock Pressure

Pipe, fittings, and joints intended for use in water-distributing

systems within residential buildings shall withstand a repetitive

shock pressure of 150 psi (1.03M Pa) for 350,000 cycles at temperatures

specified in Table A.l. 2 without rupture or leakage of fluids from

the system.

TABLE A.l.

2

SHOCK PRESSURE TEST TEMPERATURES

Intended Application Test Temperature

Cold Water Only 50°F (10°C)

Hot Water Only 180°F (82°C)

Hot or Cold Water 50°F (10°C)

180°F (82°C)

j Method of Evaluation for A. 1.2

No standard test method exists.

' Commentary on A. 1.2

I ^ An important basic criterion by which the ability of piping systems to

withstand the impact produced by water hammer may be judged is the

I number of cycles of shock pressure that may occur before failure.

' However, the result may be dependent on the form of the pressure wave

! as well as on the properties of the piping material. A suitable test procedure

should utilize a reproducible, representative pressure cycle with respect

to amplitude, frequency, and rate of transfer of energy in the simulation

j of service shock pressure conditions. These parameters might be

related to the properties of a piping material that determine its

I ability to absorb the energy at the rate produced.

53
In establishing the reproducible shock pressure to be used for testing,

it would be important to take into account the range of waveforms

produced in actual service situations.

Excessive impact loads caused by handling, installation and use can

reduce the maximum static pressure or the number or magnitude of

repetitive pressure shocks that the system can tolerate without

failure

Some methods that have been used in shock pressure tests of piping

1 have been summarized. Based on this work, a frequency of 2 Hz

with a pulse width of 0.16 s is suggested for test purposes.

A method for shock pressure testing for acceptance of water-hammer

arrestor devices has been described in ANS A112.26.1. The recommendation

for resistance to a repetitive 150 psi (shock plus static) pressure

stems from that standard.

1 Laboratory Tests of Thermoplastic Piping Assemblies Subjected to

Water Hammer and Intermittent Hot Water Flow. National Bureau of

Standards NBSIR 77-1261 (August, 1977).

2 Water Hammer Arresters, ANS A112.26.1, American Society of

Mechanical Engineers.

54
A. Attribute: FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

A. 2 Requirement: DRAINABILITY AND HYDRAULIC CAPACITY

A. 2.1 Criterion: Beam/Column Deflection and Ring Distortion

Essential functions of the piping shall not be compromised by intermittent

and temporary changes in design direction or pitch, nor in crosssectional area or shape of the piping, during exposure to representative

intermittent hot water loading (140°F^ for DWV piping and ISO^F for

water distribution piping for residential use) and associated pressures

and thermally induced structural loads. Directional or pitch change

shall not exceed arctan 0.01 (equivalent to approximately 1/8 in/ft).

The difference between maximum and minimum diameters at any cross section shall not exceed 10% during the exposure to hot water.

Method of Evaluation for A. 2.1

Nq standard test method exists.

Commentary on A. 2.1

Adequate hydraulic capacity is generally considered essential for

the purposes of the basic functional requirements. Satisfaction of

this requirement is facilitated by materials and designs that provide

for the minimization of intermittent changes in cross sectional area

and shape, and for the minimization of lateral movement or deflection

under ordinary service conditions.

"' Frequent exposure of DWV piping to water temperatures in excess

of 60°C (140°F) for any extended period of time seems unlikely.

However, because water heaters may sometimes be shipped with

thermostats set at a higher temperature and because new dishwashers

with internal heaters may discharge approximately two gallons of

water at about 82°C (180°F) over a short time, any further development

work on this test should include a review of representative exposure

temperatures. Possibly a temperature of 6S°C (155°F) would be

realistic for test purposes.

55
Design hydraulic carrying capacities, pneumatic pressure control and

self-scouring capability are dependent on the continuous maintenance

of design pitch in "horizontal" lines and of initial cross-sectional

area and shape in both horizontal and vertical lines. Pitch changes

of more than arctan 0.01 in horizontal lines can adversely affect

self-scouring capability and hydraulic-pneumatic system functions,

and directional changes of more than arctan 0.01 in either vertical

or horizontal lines can adversely affect acoustic performance.

Diametral differences greater than 10% may indicate structural

instability of pipe and may adversely affect functional performance

of the system, at least for horizontal lines. A reasonable limit

for cross-sectional area change needs to be established. A test

procedure should provide for a reproducible, representative loading

cycle, applied to a representative assembly of pipe, fittings, supports

and attachments. The minimum level of performance established should be

consistent with the essential requirements for fluid-transport capacity

of the piping system, and consistent with the general capability of

the trade to provide the corresponding necessary precision in installation

detail. Some of the test procedures that have been utilized have been

2 summarized

The test employed should be designed for extended application to serve

the needs of A. 1.1. Probably the purposes of A. 2.1 would be served

by measurements made during the first 100 cycles of a suitable cyclic

hot water exposure test.

Laboratory Tests of Thermoplastic Piping Assemblies Subjected to

Water Hammer and Intermittent Hot-Water Flow. National Bureau of

Standards NBSIR 77-1261 (August, 1977).

56
A. Attribute: FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

A. 2 Requirement: DRAINABILITY AND HYDRAULIC CAPACITY

A. 2. 2 Criterion: Continuity and Smoothness of Interior Surfaces

Piping shall facilitate efficiency and continuity of hydraulic

functional operation, as follows:

1. The interior surfaces of pipe and fittings shall be smooth

and essentially free of burrs, ledges, shoulders or other

surface discontinuities.

2. Materials and techniques for making joints shall not effectively

reduce the internal cross-sectional area of the piping nor introduce significant discontinuities in the interior surface.

Method of Evaluation for A. 2.

2

No standard test method exists.

Commentary on A. 2.

2

j Excessive roughness causes energy loss and reduction of hydraulic

capacity in piping and may contribute to the buildup of deposits

in both water supply piping and drainage piping.

Pipe, fittings and joints should be manufactured and installed so

as to facilitate efficiency and continuity of hydraulic functional

operation. Abrupt, sharp-radius changes in direction should be

avoided by the use of hydraulically efficient, smooth-turn

fittings. Drainage piping should not be reduced in cross-sectional

area in the normal direction of flow (certain standard methods for

connecting 4 in (100 mm) water closet branches to 3 in (75 mm) soil

stacks excepted). Restrictions, abrupt enlargements or discontinuities

at pipe joints can reduce hydraulic capacity, contribute to fouling

and stoppage, adversely affect cleanability , and contribute to

corrosion.

57
Standard test methods

and relief are needed,

above.

for hydraulic resistance or for surface discontinuity

that would address the parameters indicated

Laboratory test procedures should provide for a reproducible,

representative fluid load, applied to a representative assembly of pipe

and fittings. The measure of overall resistance to fluid flow might

be a roughness factor or a head loss as determined by a procedure that

is consistent with the generally accepted "rational" pipe flow formula.^

The measure of surface relief and discountinuity might be based

further on the adaptation of a method that has been used for

determining the surface profiles of abraded surfaces of porcelain

enameled and fiberglass-reinforced polyester sanitary plumbing

fixtures

Useful guidance for designers and installers in attaining minimum

hydraulic resistance and in maintaining surface continuity has been

provided in a number of industry publications (See Appendix, Section 8.3).

Flow velocity, water composition and service temperature should be

considered in the selection of piping materials and in the estimation

of hydraulic resistance in the service environment. Further data and/or

analysis are needed on these effects, to facilitate rational and realistic

decisions concerning design, specification and acceptance where innovative

piping materials are being considered.

^ Handbook of Hydraulics, E. F. Brater and Horace King, McGraw-Hill, 1976,

Investigation of Performance Characteristics for Sanitary Plumbing

Fixtures. National Bureau of Standards BSS 22 (1970).

58
A. Attribute: FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

A. 3 Requirement: ACOUSTICAL ACCEPTABILITY

A. 3.1 Criterion: Noise Reduction Between Living Units, Through

Interdwell ing Walls Containing Piping

The design and installation of the plumbing system, taken together

with that of the wall, chase, or partition in which the piping is

enclosed, shall be such that the noise reduction set forth in Table A. 3.1 can be attained between living units, and between public space

or service areas (e.g., corridors or mechanical equipment rooms) and

a living unit.

The Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of interdwelling walls,

determined by documentation or laboratory measurement, shall be 5 units

greater than the Noise Isolation Class (NIC) values given in Table A. 3.1.

Method of Evaluation for A. 3.1

Evaluation of design drawings and computation.

Field inspection and documentation during construction.

The NIC ratings shall be determined by tests of prototype or field units.

Test Methods

Appendix Al of ASTM E336, "Standard Recommended Practice for Measurement

of Airborne Sound Insulation in Buildings" (for NIC).

ASTM E90, "Standard Recommended Practice for Laboratory Measurement of

Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions (for STC).

ASTM E413, "Standard Classification for Determination of Sound Transmission

Class." (This is used for both NIC and STC determination).

Commentary on A. 3.1

The NIC rating is based upon noise reduction, which is a measure of the

sound isolation between two enclosed spaces, the source space and the

receiving space, and is not necessarily a function of the dividing

partition alone since it is affected by any flanking paths.

59
TABLE A. 3.1

Minimum Noise Isolation of Interdwelling Walls and Partitions

LOCATION OF PARTITION

Living unit to living unit

corridor^ or public space

of average noise^

Living unit to public space

and service areas of high

noise"^

NOISE ISOLATION CLASS (NIC)

40

These values assume floors in corridors are carpeted; otherwise increase

NIC by 5.

Public space of average noise includes lobbies, storage rooms, stairways, etc.

Areas of high noise include boiler rooms, mechanical equipment rooms,

elevator shafts, laundries, trash or incinerator shafts, garages, and

most commercial uses. Increase NIC by 5 when adjacent to mechanical

equipment which operates at high noise levels.

60
The STC rating is a laboratory measure of the best sound isolation that

could be obtained with a given partition design. It specifically

excludes the effects of any flanking paths, and is usually somewhat

better than field performance. When the STC rating cannot be justified

by published data for similar partitions or by computation using

appropriate analysis, laboratory measurements shall be made. Results

should be obtained prior to construction.

As a design guide, STC-type measurements of completed assemblies (with

all plumbing installed) may be made in the laboratory to help predict

attainment of the required field performance.

61
A. Attribute: FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

A. 3 Requirement: ACOUSTICAL ACCEPTABILITY

A. 3. 2 Criterion: Noise Reduction Between Living Units, Through

Interdwelling Floor-Ceilings Containing Piping

The design and installation of the plumbing system, taken together

with that of the chase or floor-ceiling in which the piping is enclosed,

shall be such that the noise reduction set forth in Table A. 3. 2 can

be attained between living units, and between public space or service

areas (e.g., corridors or mechanical equipment rooms) and a living unit.

The STC and IIC ratings of interdwelling floor-ceiling assemblies,

determined by documentation or laboratory measurement, shall be 5 units

greater than the NIC and field IIC values given in Table A. 3. 2.

Method of Evaluation for A. 3.

Evaluation of design drawings and computation.

Field inspection and documentation during construction.

The NIC and field IIC ratings shall be determined by tests of prototype

or field units.

Test Methods

Appendix Al of ASTM E336, "Standard Recommended Practice for Measurement

of Airborne Sound Insulation in Buildings" (for NIC).

ASTM E90, "Standard Recommended Practice for Laboratory Measurement of

Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions (for STC),

ASTM E413, "Standard Classification for Determination of Sound Transmission

Class" (This is used for both NIC and STC determination).

ASTM E942, "Tentative Method of Laboratory Measurement of Impact Sound

Transmission through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies Using the Tapping Machine."

(This is used for both laboratory and field measurement).

62
TABLE A. 3.

2

Minimum Noise Isolation and Impact Insulation of

Interdwelling Floor-Ceiling Assemblies

LOCATION OF FLOOR-CEILING NIC

FIELD IMPACT INSULATION

CLASS (FIELD IIC)

Floor-ceiling separating

living units from other

living units corridors,^

public space^ or service

areas of average noise ' 40 40

Floor-ceiling separating

living units from public

space and service areas

(high noise)^ including

corridor floors over living units^ 45 45

^ These values assume floors in corridors are carpeted; otherwise increase

NIC and IIC by 5.

^ Does not apply to field impact insulation class (IIC) of floor above

storage rooms where noise from living units would not be objectionable.

Public space of average noise includes lobbies, storage rooms, stairways,

etc

.

^ The impact insulation requirements may be relaxed where equivalent

performance is achieved, e.g., where heating, ventilating, and airconditioning (HVAC) equipment is mounted with effective vibration

isolation.

^ Areas of high noise include boiler rooms, mechanical equipment rooms,

elevator shafts, laundries, incinerator shafts, garages and most

commercial uses. Increase NIC by 5 when adjacent to mechanical

equipment which operates at high noise levels.

63
Commentary on A. 3.

The NIC rating is based upon noise reduction, which is a measure of

the sound isolation between two enclosed spaces, the source space

and the receiving space, and is not necessarily a function of the

dividing partition alone since it is affected by any flanking paths.

The STC rating is a laboratory measure of the best sound isolation

that could be obtained with a given partition design. It specifically

excludes the effects of any flanking paths, and is usually somewhat

better than field performance. When the STC rating cannot be justified

by published data for similar partitions or by computation using

appropriate analysis, laboratory measurements shall be made. Results

should be obtained prior to construction.

As a design guide, STC-type measurements of completed assemblies (with

all plumbing installed) may be made in the laboratory to help predict

attainment of the required field performance.

64
A. Attribute: FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

A. 3 Requirement: ACOUSTICAL ACCEPTABILITY

A. 3. 3 Criterion: Noise Reduction Between Spaces Within a Living

Unit) Through Walls and Partitions Containing

Piping

The design and installation of the plumbing system, taken together

with that of the wall, chase, or partition in which the piping is

enclosed, shall be such that a noise reduction of at least NIC 28 can

be attained within a living unit between spaces where noise insulation

is intended.

As a design guide, the STC rating of the walls, determined by documentation

or laboratory measurement, should be at least 7 units greater than the

NIC value given.

Method of Evaluation for A. 3.

3

The NIC ratings shall be determined by tests of prototype or field units.

Test Methods

Appendix Al of ASTM E336, "Standard Recommended Practice for Measurement

of Airborne Sound Insulation in Buildings" (for NIC).

ASTM E90, "Standard Recommended Practice for Laboratory Measurement of

Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions" (for STC).

ASTM E413, "Standard Classification for Determination of Sound Transmission

Class." (This is used for both NIC and STC determination).

Commentary on A. 3.

3

The NIC rating is based upon noise reduction, which is a measure of

the sound isolation between two enclosed spaces, the source space and

the receiving space, and is not necessarily a function of the dividing

partition alone since it is affected by any flanking paths.

The STC rating is a laboratory measure of the besc sound isolation

that could be obtained with a given partition design. It specifically

65
excludes the effects of any flanking paths, and is usually somewhat

better than field performance.

66
A. Attribute: FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

A. 3 Requirement: ACOUSTICAL ACCEPTABILITY

A. 3. 4 Criterion: Noise Reduction Between Spaces Within A Living

Unit, Through Floor-Ceilings Containing Piping

The design and installation of the plumbing system, taken together

with that of the chase or floor-ceiling in which the piping is enclosed,

shall be such that a noise reduction of at least NIC 28 and field IIC 28 can be attained within a living unit between spaces where noise insulation

is intended.

As a design guide, the STC and IIC ratings of the floor-ceiling assemblies

determined by documentation or laboratory measurements should be at

least 7 units greater than the NIC and field IIC values given.

Method of Evaluation for A. 3.4

The NIC and field IIC ratings shall be determined by tests of prototype

or field units.

Test Methods

Appendix Al of ASTM E336, "Standard Recommended Practice for Measurement

of Airborne Sound Insulation in Buildings" (for NIC).

ASTM E90, "Standard Recommended Practice for Laboratory Measurement of

Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions" (For STC).

ASTM E413, "Standard Classification for Determination of Sound Transmission

Class." (This is used for both NIC and STC determination).

ASTM E492, "Tentative Method of Laboratory Measurement of Impact Sound

Transmission Through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies Using the Tapping Machine."

This is used for both laboratory and field measurements.

67
A. Attribute: FUNCTIONAL ADEQUACY

A. 3 Requirement: ACOUSTICAL ACCEPTABILITY

A. 3. 5 Criterion: Noise Level in Interior Spaces During Operation

of Plumbing System

Noise in interior spaces shall be kept below a level which will cause discomfort or annoyance to the occupants. Each plumbing system element

shall perform its intended function without excessive noise generation

or compromise of the acoustical performance of other building elements.

The design and installation of the plumbing system, taken together

with that of the plumbing wall, chase, floor-ceiling or partition in whi

the piping is enclosed, shall be such that the A-weigh ted -sound levels

in interior living spaces shall not exceed 45 dB during the imposition

of typical hydraulic loads (drainage and water supply).

Method of Evaluation for A. 3.

Measurement of sound pressure levels in living spaces of unoccupied

prototypes after completion with all plumbing systems installed and in

operation.

Test Methods

ANS 81.13 "Standard Methods for Measurement of Sound Pressure Levels."

(Sound levels resulting from interior building sources shall be read

on a meter with fast-response characteristic and weighted on the A-scale

as defined for Sound Level Meters).

68
5.3 CRITERIA FOR HEALTH AND LIFE SAFETY

This group of criteria is concerned with the type of performance that

is required to provide service without harmful effects on user health

or safety, insofar as this may depend on the properties of the materials

of which the piping system is comprised (See Figure 6 and Table 3)

.

An example is resistance to the impartation of toxic substances to

potable water. Another example is resistance to fire spread through

wall assemblies containing piping systems.

Again, as with the functional criteria, performance of the piping from

the standpoint of health and safety can be influenced by the characteristics

of the interface between pipes and fittings, and between the piping

and the building materials. Therefore, the criteria must address

installed assemblages rather than simply pipes and fittings individually.

69
B. Attribute: ADEQUACY FOR HEALTH/ SAFETY

B.l Requirement: TOXICOLOGICAL ACCEPTABILITY

B.1.1 Criterion: Elution of Toxic Substances

Materials used for potable water service and distribution systems shall

not contribute to a health hazard through contamination of the potable

water. The purity of the potable water at the points of use shall

meet the levels in the Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards^

2 as amended by the National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations.

Inorganic chemical contaminants shall not exceed the levels set forth

in Table B.1.1.

Method of Evaluation for B.1.1

The test procedure for extraction of inorganic chemicals shall be as promulgated by the National Sanitation Foundation ' and recommended

by a task group of the Federal Construction Council - Building Research

Advisory Board. ^ All innovative piping materials used in the potable

water service and distribution systems shall be approved as toxicologically

Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards - 1962, PHS Publication

No. 956. Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,

Washington, D.C. 20402.

National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations, Environmental

Protection Agency Water Programs, Subchapter D, Part 141, Federal

Register, Volume 40, No. 248, December 24, 1975. Superintendent

of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.

A Study of Plastic Pipe for Potable Water Supplies, W. D. Tiedman and

N. A. Milone, June 1955, National Sanitation Foundation, P. 0. Box 1468,

2355 West Stadium Blvd., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106.

National Sanitation Foundation Standard No. 14. "Thermoplastic

Materials - Pipe, Fittings, Valves, Jointing Materials", October 1965.

National Sanitation Foundation, P. 0. Box 1468, 2355 West Stadium Blvd.

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106.

Thermoplastic Piping for Potable Water Distribution Systems, BRAB/FCC

Technical Report No. 61, 1971, National Academy of Sciences - National

Research Council, 2101 Constitution Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20418.

70
TABLE B.1.1

Maximum Contaminant Levels

Inorganic Chemicals:

Level,

milligrams

Contaminant per liter

Arsenic 0.05

Barium 1.

Cadmium 0.010

Chromium 0.05

Lead 0.05

Mercury 0.002

Nitrate (as N) 10.

Selenium 0.01

Silver 0.05

71
suitable for the purpose by a generally recognized testing/evaluating

agency. One such agency is the National Sanitation Foundation Testing

Laboratory

Commentary on B.1.1

The test recommended appears adequate for inorganic chemical contaminants.

However, no test has been developed for possible contaminants or other

effects from potential slime growth on the interior of the pipe.

Generally, lead pipe and fittings shall not be used to convey potable

water, nor shall pipe and fittings be used in the conveyance of

potable water that are manufactured with a process that leaves a residue of lead compound on the interior surface of the piping, nor

shall the materials as installed contribute to deleterious elution

of lead compounds into the potable water.

In the installation or major repairs of potable water systems,

sterilization shall be accomplished in accordance with generally

accepted practice, and piping which has previously been used for

any purpose other than for conveying potable water shall not be used

6 7 for conveying potable water ' .

The Model Codes are: Basic Plumbing Code (BPC) , Building Officials and Code Administrators

International, Inc. (BOCA), 1313 E. 60 Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637.

National Standard Plumbing Code (NSPC) , National Association of PlumbingHeating-Cooling Contractors (NAPHCC) and American Society of Plumbing

Engineers (ASPE) , 1016 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036.

Standard Plumbing Code (SPC) , Southern Building Code Congress

International, Inc. (SBCC), 3617 8th Avenue South, Birmingham,

Alabama 35222.

Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) , International Association of Plumbing

and Mechanical Officials (lAPMO), 5032 Alhambra Avenue, Los Angeles,

CA 90032.

AWWA Standard for Disinfecting Water Mains, AWWA ClOl, American Water

Works Association, 6666 W. Quincy Ave., Denver, Colo. 80235

72
B. Attribute: ADEQUACY FOR HEALTH/ SAFETY

B.2 Requirement: FIRE SAFETY

B.2.1 Criterion: Fire Spread

The drain-waste-vent (DWV) system, as designed and installed, including

exposed piping and piping within walls, chases, and floor-ceiling

assemblies, shall not compromise the fire endurance ratings of such

walls, chases, and floor-ceiling assemblies as set forth in Table B.2.1.

73
TABLE B.2.1 1/

Minimum Fire Resistance Ratings in Hours by Type s of Construction (1)

ELEMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4

2a 2b 3a(2) 3b

EXTERIOR WALLS

Bearing

Under 30 ft separation 2 2 1 2 2 1 30 ft and over separation 2 2 3/4 2 1 3/4

Non—Bearing

Under 10 ft separation 2 1 1 2 2 1 10 ft to 30 ft separation 1 1 3/4 1 1 3/4

Over 30 ft separation 0 0 0 0 0 0

INTERIOR WALLS & PARTITIONS

Fire, and lot-line walls 2 2 2 2 2 2 Bearing 2 1 1 2 1 1 Non-bearing NC NC NC C C C

Exit enclosure of stairways,

elevator shafts, etc. (3) 2 2 1 2 1 1 Partitions separating living units

and enclosing public corridors 1 1 1 1 1 1

FLOOR CONSTRUCTION (6) 2 1 1 1 1 1

WALLS, FLOORS AND CEILINGS^

1. Of lobbies and corridors between

exit stairways and exterior 2 2 1 2 1 1 2. Separating commercial from

residential 2 2 2 2NC 2NC 2 3. Enclosing service spaces 2 2 2 2 2 2 4. Enclosing tenant general

storage area 1 1 1 1 1 1

5. Separating garage from

residential

For 1 to 4 cars 1 1 1 1 1 1 For more than 4 cars 2 2 2 2 2 2

SHAFT ENCLOSURES

CONSTRUCTION ENCLOSING BOILER, HEATER

OR INCINERATOR ROOMS, FUEL STORAGE

AREAS AND TRASH CHUTES (7)

1/ These fire ratings a re derived from the HUD Minimum Property Standards No. 4910.1 ~ for Multi-family housing.

74
Notes for Table B.2.1

(1) Abreviations

:

0 designates that no specific fire resistance rating is required.

L.U. - Living Unit

NC designates noncombustible construction, but no specific fire

resistance rating is required.

C designates that the structural members of the construction may

be of combustible materials, but no specific fire resistance

rating is required.

Types of Construction:

All residential buildings shall be classified into one of the

following construction types:

Type 1 - Fire Resistive

Type 2 - Noncombustible

Subtypes: 2a and 2b

Type 3 - Exterior Protected

Subtypes: 3a and 3b

Type 4 - Wood Frame

(2) In Type 3a construction the corridor walls, floors and ceilings,

partitions enclosing vertical openings, stairways, columns and

beams shall be 2-hr. noncombustible for structure of 3 or more

stories, and 1-hr. noncombustible for 1 or 2 stories.

(3) In buildings of Types 1, 2a and 3a construction, not more than

3 stories in height, and having not more than 12 living units

within a fire division, exit enclosures may have fire resistive

rating of one hour.

(4) Roof construction with ventilated attic need only have ceiling

assemblies with a finish rating of at least 20 minutes.

(5) Service spaces are paint, carpentry or maintenance shops and

other spaces where flammable materials are stored.

(6) Floor construction within a two story living unit may have a 1/3 hr. fire resistance rating, where limited to one living

unit in building height, and walls separating units are at

least 1 1/2 hr. rating.

(7) Individual living unit heater rooms not included in this requirement.

75
Method of Evaluation for B.2.1

ASTM E119 Fire Endurance Test^.

Commentary

Fire resistance rated walls, chases and floor-ceiling assemblies which

are to have DWV systems within or penetrating their construction should

be subjected to the same testing criterion as the rated assembly without

plumbing. ASTM E119 is a generally accepted test for rating the fire

resistance of structural components. Therefore, a test of the assembly

with the DWV system installed as intended for the field application

is recommended to assure compliance with the fire resistance requirements

of Criterion B.2.1. Traps extending from the wall should be filled with

water as representative of a field installation. The ASTM E119 fire

endurance test puts limits on the temperature rise of the unexposed

side of the wall (139°C average temperature rise over the surface and

181°C rise at any point), and prohibits the passage of flames and hot

gases sufficient to ignite cotton padding. Trap arms, traps and pipes

penetrating the wall are excluded from the temperature rise limitation

since they are not part of the wall surface specified in ASTM E119.

Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials.

ASTM Designation E119.

76
B. Attribute: ADEQUACY FOR HEALTH/ SAFETY

B.2 Requirement: FIRE SAFETY

B.2.2 Criterion: Spread of Smoke and Toxic Gases

The inclusion of plumbing systems and their components as part of a wall, chase or floor-ceiling assembly, shall not cause the spread of

excessive smoke and toxic gases to the unexposed side of the assembly.

Generally accepted quantative limits for smoke and toxic gases for

the purpose of this criterion have not been established.

Method of Evaluation for B.2.2

No standard test method exists.

Commentary

It is recommended that a standard test method be developed based on the

ASTM E119 test^, but which in addition would simulate representative

air circulation conditions and would include suitable methods of

sampling and measuring the concentrations of smoke and toxic gases

transferred to the unexposed side of the assembly during the fire

test. Further research is needed to provide a basis for acceptable

limits as well as for standard test procedures and methods of

measurement

.

It is recommended that no combustible piping be placed within ventilation

shafts or chases vented to the inside of the building, without the

installation of adequate accessible protective sprinklers.

Standard Method of Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials.

ASTM Designation E119.

77
B. Attribute: ADEQUACY FOR HEALTH/ SAFETY

B.2 Requirement: FIRE SAFETY

B.2.3 Criterion: Flame Spread

The surface flame spread of exposed piping shall not be in excess of

the limits set forth in Table B.2.3.

78
TABLE B.2.3

FLAME SPREAD RATING LIMITATIONS FOR EXPOSED INTERIOR PIPING (1)(2)

Surface Flame

Location Within Building Spread RatingMaximum Range

Enclosed Stairways & Other

Vertical Openings 0-25

Corridors or Hallways & Other Exits 0-75

Within Living Unit (3) 0-200

Public Rooms & Entrance

Spaces 0-75

Lobbies & Corridors Between

Exit Stairway & Exterior 0-25

Service Rooms, Enclosing Heat

Producing or Other Mechanical

Equipment, and all other Fire

Hazardous Areas 0-25

Notes

(1) Plumbing fixtures may be excluded in the determination of flamespread limitations for rooms or other spaces.

These flame spread ratings are comparable to those for exposed ^ building materials in the same locations as given by the HUD

Minimum Property Standards.

(2) Where automatic sprinkler protection is appropriately provided, the

flame spread ratings may be increased in the following amounts; 0-25

to 0-75 and 0-75 to 0-200.

(3) Flame spread rating in housing for the elderly = 0-75.

79
Method of Evaluation for B.2.3

ASTM ES^^ or ASTM E162^ tests for surface burning characteristics

or surface f lammability

Commentary

The flame spread rating is an accepted method for expressing surface

burning characteristics of building materials. The criterion is

designed to limit the potential rapid spread of fire within rooms or other open spaces along horizontal or vertical runs of exposed piping

that might be subject to significant surface flame spread.

Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of

Building Materials. ASTM Designation E84.

Standard Method of Test for Surface Flammability of Materials

Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source. ASTM Designation E162.

80
5.4 CRITERIA FOR DURABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY

This group of criteria describes measures for evaluating capability

for continued, functionally adequate service for a reasonable length

of time without excessive maintenance. If these criteria are adequate

and are applied, then continued performance is assured for the functional

criteria (Section 5.2). It is assumed that degradation over time is

not more critical to health and safety (Section 5.3) than to function.

The criteria for durability and maintainability are concerned primarily

with those properties or characteristics that might be subject to

change over a period of service; for example, strength, dimensions,

flexibility, etc. (See Figure 6 and Table 3, pages 52 and 54, respectively).

The purpose of these criteria is to facilitate the prediction of long

term performance potential by the use of short-term laboratory tests.

Correlation is needed between the results of such tests and the results

of long-term service exposure tests or laboratory tests simulating

service exposure (See A. 1.1, A. 1.2, A. 2.1 and C.1.1).

81
C. Attribute: ADEQUACY FOR DURABILITY/MAINTAINABILITY

C.l Requirement: RETENTION OF PROPERTIES FOR ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONAL

PERFORMANCE

C.1.1 Criterion: Long-Term Stability of Dimensions and Strength

The planned life expectancy of the piping system as installed shall

be attainable without compromise of the essential functional performance

of the system from degradation of the important dimensional and

structural properties of the piping materials, with representative

intermittent exposures to the expected extreme conditions of hot water -

and aggressive wastes, and to the expected maximum pressures and other

structural loads. The following criteria are applicable:

(a) Dimensional Change

Exposure to 100,00 cycles of a suitable hot-water exposure

test shall not cause the maximum angular deflection of

pipes to exceed arctan 0.01, the diametral difference to

exceed 10%, and the creep or permanent linear dimensional

change to exceed 0.5%.

(b) Strength Reduction

Exposure to 100,000 cycles of a suitable hot-water exposure

test shall not cause the impact resistance, the ringdeflection strength and the beam strength to decrease by

more than 25%. Further, the exposure shall not cause the

' burst strength and leak resistance to be reduced below the

levels required by Criteria A. 1.1 and A. 1.2.

Method of Ev a luation for C.1.1

Although no standard all-inclusive performance evaluation methodology

has yet been established (see Commentary), the following test methods

should be used for determination of important individual performance

characteristics or related properties:

(a ) Glass Transition Temperature ^

See Table C.1.1

This and other terms are defined in Standard Definitions of Terms

Relating to Plastics, ASTM D883.

82
(b ) Hardness Temperature Coefficient

See Table C.1.1

(c) Heat Deformation and Permanent Set

See Table C.1.1

(d) Burst Strength Under Cyclic Pressure

See Table C.1.1

(e ) Lateral Deflection

See Table C.1.1

A discussion of the applicable test methods is provided in the Commentary.

Commentary on C.1.1

Evaluations of innovative piping materials should take into account

the possible adverse effects of extreme thermal and structural loads,

piping system installation details, and representative conditions of use. Dimensional changes which may occur and the probable extremes

of thermal and structural loads should not cause significant degradation

of any essential aspect of functional performance including self-scouring

capability, drainability , hydraulic capacity, freedom from leaks, and

structural reliability of supports and attachments. Examples of

environmental factors which should be considered are hot water, wood

shrinkage and soil and building settlement. Permanent dimensional

changes and changes in stress distributions resulting from such factors

should not be sufficient to produce damaging stresses on joints,

supports and attachments; excessive distortion of cross-section or excessive lateral deflection; separation of joints and expansion

fittings, etc.

Depending on the duration and frequency of intermittent exposure to

hot water, pipe diameter and wall thickness, distance from the source,

and other factors, the temperatures within the piping material in the

service environment are likely to be appreciably less than those at

83
the source (water heater). Measurement ' of glass transition

temperatures for PVC, ABS , CPVC, and PB yielded values ranging from a low of 79°C (174°F) for PVC to a high of 123°C (253°F) for CPVC.

Temperatures in excess of 65°C (140°F) in the the piping material seem

unlikely in most residential plumbing applications. However, some new dishwashers can discharge small quantities of internally heated

water into DWV piping at temperatures approaching 82°C (180°F)

and some water heater thermostats are currently shipped set

at 155°F. Where such higher temperatures are anticipated in

the piping material, CPVC, PB or other heat-resistant material

should be used. Probably there should be little concern about

using ABS, PVC, CPVC or PB (having formulations identical to

those examined in this study) in residential plumbing insofar as glass transition is concerned, when installed and used in accordance

with generally accepted good practice. However, for future materials,

this measure should be considered for evaluation purposes.

A number of ASTM tests of properties which may relate to functional

performance capability are identified in Table C.1.1 and in Table

5 of the Appendix. These should be evaluated for usefulness in

completing the development of the performance tests needed for C.1.1.

There are several tests of individual properties which can be used

to indicate possible deficiencies in the ability of a piping system

to provide essential long-term functional performance. Comments on some of these recommended evaluation tests are given below:

Investigation of Procedures for Determination of Thermal Performance

Characteritsics of Plastic Piping Used in Housing. National Bureau

of Standards NBSIR 74-610 (November 1974).

3 Thermal Properties of Selected Plastic Piping Used in Housing. National

Bureau of Standards NBSIR 74-629 (April 1975).

84
Glass transition . For a thermoplastic pipe, the glass transition

temperature must be above the maximum service temperature (actual

temperature in the piping material) if possible excessive permanent

dimensional changes due to relaxation of internal stresses in the

plastic piping components produced in the manufacture of pipe and

fittings are to be prevented. The recommended test involves the

measurement of the displacement of a loaded probe resting on a specimen,

as a function of temperature, time and load (See Table C.1.1).

Heat deformation and permanent set . A short, simple test is

needed to indicate the magnitude of the permanent deformation (dimensional

change) that may be expected from exposure to heat at temperatures near

the expected maximum pipe temperature in service. It appears that a simple oven test made with relatively short lengths of pipe or with

fittings, not structurally loaded, provides a realistic measure of the

possible deformation. Measurements m 120 hour oven tests

(See Table C.1.1) with PVC and ABS at 11° C (171°F) produced essentially

no length change in ABS, and about -1% length change in PVC. In

residential plumbing applications, a temperature as high as 11°

C

within the piping material seems highly unlikely because of the typical

intermittent, short-duration exposure pattern and because of the cooling

of the hot water in the distributing pipes and drain lines. Since typical

maximum pipe temperatures in drainage systems in residential use

are likely to be appreciably less than 11°C, heat deformation of PVC

or ABS should not be a problem in residential DWV usage.

Creep''^. Small dimensional changes in piping materials can be

accomodated by design and installation, but excessive changes, whether

intermittent or permanent, can lead to rupture and leaking, drainability

problems, acoustical problems, etc. Under some conditions, permanent . dimensional changes can occur through long-term creep under forces of

structural or thermal orgin. The BRAB test S-3 Concentrated Load

Test^ measures creep under externally imposed structural loads.

Ibid

Ibid

Thermoplastic Piping for Potable Water Distribution Systems, F.C.C.

Technical Report No. 61, NAS/NRC (1971).

85
H3 s

9S

CO

CO

PQZQUCO3H

CO

b4H 2OMH

H-l OSU

CO

(dO

b<

EdM

13!

aiHMu>

tdJ

CM CO O OS

i-l <S vOI I * TJ •*

r-. c

CO 06 Oi M M

CO CO n pq z z o

l4 I O. U

<u o a O -Hu c o. ^ <o a

<U (0

t>« c ^ o a

00 t>0 •M G

0) M-t U 60 O

caa

COu

U 3

<U

u

O. (Q B U

0) <u

>M § O 4J C (U .2^ c •o

CO —I

CO -o

CO c

CO •a

0) 0)

•H CO u u

a

u

_ CO « g -I-l

CO 4J 0

•1-1

u

a

CO

O CO

•fJ 00 >, u <l> ^ .r^ U 9 m u O C 00

I-l CO 00 M <-i u CO •O 3

0) 00 T)

00 00 -H

CO 00

CO .-I 0)

a 9 o o

00 00 a

CO 00 O. 0) X >

0) ^3

>-l CJ

CO

0) 0)

u-i o o u

G

(U

a

a

4J ^ (U

0) 0) 00 3 0 CO "O CO • H i-H M

iM

a <u <u

01 •-< o e O CO I-l V

V

t: 3

H-l z 4J > o CO (d h-l U

C3

H <U Z o O. o z a

FU <u u

H c m I-l o

'M o H U

OS

O Z •H

td (d 00 H CO a

;3 OTI CO o 4J o fa

CO

M 00 CO 00 < CO

I-) u

CM "^1 vO vO I I -* TJ

CO CA OA

O

CM

CO CO « n z z

CO<

0)a 4-1 CO O

0) <u •o a •r^l 0)

00 if 3

(U

u 00

cu CO •

J-l cx <u 09

00

a (U VMo CO 3 o •H 4-1 c CO o t-l 00 kl • I-l o 00 <U

4-1

u a.

CO c 1 a u <u lU u •o 4-> <u B o a • H CO r-4 <u CO a C <u I-l CO a <U <u CO >

Th (U 43 00 00 3«Va§

00

00

0)d

•os

CM <0 O (».

I-l CM I I -* -o «*

r»«

d

CO 06 06 M M

CO CO

PQ PQ Z Z

00cu I—

a

CO

00

u

CO 0). O.

T3 -H W Q. M3 U

00

O

CO

(U ^a <u ^-^ u3

<U 4-1 60 CO a u

CO (t) j: a. u a

<u j: 4j

4J60

g

d o

<u ou

d I CO 3 O U

4J CM ^

CO

<U •«

O

h i-l 3 00

00

h o o X 60

0) e>

d o CO

U 1^ J3

0) o

4-1 M-l >« jCO O 4J60

•Q 0)

d

V t-i 0) d 3 >-) •H 4J gcO

Wi •

0)V CO

4.1 Oi

h

a)

a .c

T3

V

4JO

0)60

(0 4Jd

0)o

4)Q.

CO J3

4J

00 60

CO

d

0) •O .-I

CM (0 CO

0)

V

M

u 60

su su

d '

•I-l 00 00 OS

(U 0) « •o d CL4 B

•I-l CO

CO Jl< u o u

d

00 o o o 3 JS .c •I-l CO CO CO wu o o o <u 4J 4J —' d

<u o

0) Q)

V « 0) tH

u

U o o QU

d 3 d

d

u

CO CO (0 I-l

O

4J 00 4-1 4J CO 4J

00 « CO 00

U 00 •H u •I-l •H

00 en CO 00 4J

a

<s Re La o

-*

CM

CMo

COo9

00s

COu

<-lB«

.a

>t-i o

OS

OS«BhBOB

•I-l •H "O ^ .O B

cM|<n|iA|

86
Q

S>H

CO

CO

PQ

2SQU

COsH

COuH

(U3BI

CO

O CM zh

CO

as

0) M-l o o c« >.

•r^

a

ID 0)

(U (0 M 00a

IDM 0) 3 >

CL, 4J 3 <a

HM

CO

b]o

(d

i-l 06« Ho>HM>zo oMH

CJ

0)

0)3

CO

OS

4)M

(Vi

4<iuo

CO

09u

>.

(J

(Uc

•O 0)

0)

u

U 3 3 O 09

09

O <D

CO 4)

0) " »-t S o o.

09 fO M-l •H O O

09 4J 09 60 <U Co)'-*

•H

M CJ 4J 3 >

4J (0 CJ •H O

>*-i

a TJ X

•O 0) c

CO 60C

<U -H

O.

U3

0)

60OU

a.

06

H 3 W M

43 o H

06

a z 60 u a H CO v <u CO t-i u u 4-) 09 su o to 09 CO o U <u CO 09 I-l < Bur o.

\0

ots M

COnz a

CO

CO 0)

<4-l

O o o.

.—t C C8 O O

O

•H -H U *J >, O U <-< 0) <u ^ > S

M-l (I) (U (I) 09 T3 > 03

•1-1 (0

t-l 4-1 ca ca ^ U u <0 I 4J

Id o

4J 43\

flj o >^

CO 4J

a

0) 3 « B

o.M

<U 3 60 M (0 a O -H O h X

(U "Os

0) c

4-1 <U

CO CO

(U

N

U -H

CL Vl

01 o

^1 4=

433 B

09 V4

(U

CO 4J 09 60 C -I-l C -H

•H

U

U <u <u 44 > 4-1 -H CO

<uu

(U 3

)-l OD 3 O

09 Oi

cd

X

09<u

1-1u

CJ

aao

•H

4J

C o o

r" *^

<4-l

h

<u o O 44

00

1-t .pj CD Q

0) 60

44

C

ca .H J 06

01 •o

c«

44

ca

a

<a

vi0) ou u3O 0

44 o

0)

0)

00 ^ 3 o 3 60 CJ CO 3 0) <! I-l COv kl • 1-1 l-t o

—1 >4-4 ^ CM a -< 44

(U 1 X

(0 0)

09 r~ 44 ^C^ 4) 60 M OJ C CO CO

a. z

•T-l • CU 09

l-t

O V4 0) •H OS V4

4-1 "O 3

00

d 44

cd cd

1-1 44 0< CO 01 o u

o.

0) T3 ^ Cd

0) 44

01 Cd

>4-l t-l e O 3

PQ

09

4-1 f-t o>

09 ca 44

0)a

4J o 09

•1-1 >% 44 s

I-l ca o z 4-1 4J 00 ca 0) u • 44 o >

.a o CO

Cd f-t _] to

g

vol

87
but the length of this test (10,000 hours) is a disadvantage. Tests

made for heat deformation and hot water effects of PVC , ABS and CPVC

showed no cause for concern about dimensional changes in properly install

piping under the usual conditions of residential use. No tests specifica

for creep were made in this NBS study; however the test of assemblies wit

intermittent hot water exposure involved some structurally and thermally

induced stress. The dimensional changes observed in this test were within the limitations of Criterion C.1.1.

Hardness as a function of temperature . The evaluation of

piping materials for resistance to impact (e.g., shock pressure) would

be facilitated if a simple relationship could be established between

the temperature coefficient of hardness and the effect of temperature

on the resistance of the material to failure under impact.

Measurements indicate there may be a correlation between these

quantities

Summary of Tests . Table C.1.1 provides a summary of the tests

referred to in Section C.1.1 and relates them to specific performance

criteria

Correlation Needs . Before full reliance can be placed on the

tests suggested above for evaluating the stability of dimensions and

strength of piping materials, it will be necessary to establish

correlations, under selected conditions, between the performance

measured in these tests and that in full-scale tests in representative

assemblies exposed to intermittent hot and/or cold water, and to shock

pressure and sustained pressure.

^ Ibid

^ Ibid

88
C. Attribute: ADEQUACY FOR DURABILITY/MAINTAINABILITY

C.l Requirement: RETENTION OF PROPERTIES FOR ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONAL

PERFORMANCE

C.l. 2 Criterion: Resistance to Chemical Attack and Environmental

Stress Cracking

Essential functional performance of piping systems shall not be compromised

through degradation of critical properties of the materials, by the

most severe expected exposures to household cleaning chemicals, drain

declogging chemicals, or ordinary household wastes, nor to the chemicals

normally contained in potable water supplies, during the existence of

representative stresses in the systems.

Method of Evaluation for C.l.

2

No standard test method exists.

Commentary on C.l.

2

The present widespread acceptance of several specific types of thermoplastic

piping for residential plumbing and the absence of recent reports of

failures due to chemical attack or environmental stress cracking, suggests

that these characteristics have ceased to be of significant concern

in this application of these thermoplastic piping materials. However,

the following discussion is provided to illustrate the considerations

that might be involved in applying the performance approach to the

evaluation of future innovative piping materials.

Among the principal environmental variables affecting resistance of

installed DWV piping to chemicals are: (1) concentration and composition

of chemicals introduced into piping systems (2) retention period in

system or component, and frequency of exposure to wastes containing

chemicals (3) temperature of the liquids containing the chemical

agents during the exposure period.

Stress concentration during exposure to certain chemicals may contribute

to environmental stress cracking of some materials. Some degree of

stress concentration, particularly at joints/fittings might arise from

89
conditions such as: (a) Forced alignment of pipes and fittings during

installation, (b) Building settlement, lumber shrinkage. (c) Thermal

expansion/contraction and long-term dimensional changes.

In order to establish representative values for these variables in a test simulating service exposure conditions, adequate data from actual

use in occupied buildings are needed. It would also be important to

consider the heat-absorbing and heat-transfer properties of the piping

materials in the development of such a test.

The problem of defining a suitable test for innovative materials involves

defining representative waste temperature and composition, and establishing

a representative exposure cycle. Such a procedure should be capable

of producing results indicating satisfactory performance of materials

that have been found generally acceptable through the test of service

history. The test should utilize the measures of leak resistance,

drainability , hydraulic capacity and stability of strength and dimensions

as determinants of the adequacy of performance of representative assemblies

after representative exposure.

Two chemical tests have been suggested as useful, by the Federal

1 2 Construction Council of the Building Research Advisory Board. ' One

of these (Test C-1 Chemical Test) was for potable water pipe and fittings.

This test utilized an ASTM procedure for determination of resistance

to bursting .

Thermoplastic Piping for Potable Water Distribution Systems. BRAB/FCC

Technical Report No. 61 (1971). National Academy of Sciences - National

Research Council.

2 . . . . . . . . Rigid Thermoplastic Pipe and Fittings for Residential Dram-Waste and

Vent Systems. BRAB/FCC Technical Report No. 52 (1966). National

Academy of Sciences - National Research Council.

Standard Method of Test for Short-Time Rupture Strength of Plastic

Pipe, Tubing and Fittings, ASTM D1599.

90
The other BRAB test (Chemical Resistance) was for DWV piping. This

test utilized ASTM D790^ for determination of flexural strength and

modulus of elasticity. The ASTM tests were suggested for determination

of changes in the indicated properties resulting from specified

chemical exposures for relatively short periods of time.

The principal deficiencies of the tests (as performance evaluation methods)

are (1) the key exposure conditions (concentration, composition, duration

of continuous exposure, temperature, stress level and flushing) may not

be adequately representative, and (2) it is not known whether the

durations of exposure in the tests will produce a suitable simulation

of the cumulative effects of many short-time exposures over a period

of years in the service environment. Further, the tests used for

detecting changes in characteristics do not evaluate dimensional

stability, and in the case of DWV piping, do not address possible

changes in joints nor in leak resistance of piping assemblies. None

of the tests reviewed involved testing under stress levels established

as representative of the service environment.

^ Test for Flexural Properties of Plastics, ASTM D790,

91
C. Attribute: ADEQUACY FOR DURABILITY/MAINTAINABILITY

C.l Requirement: RETENTION OF PROPERTIES FOR ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONAL

CAPABILITY

C.l. 3 Criterion: Resistance to Abrasion and Cutting

Materials used for DWV piping shall provide resistance to abrasion and

cutting adequate to permit the use of all likely mechanical pipe-cleaning

procedures without adverse effects on the essential functional performance

of the system.

Method of Evaluation for C.l.

No standard test method exists.

Commentary on C.l.

Appropriate fittings should be installed so as to facilitate the use of

commercial drain cleaning tools without excessive abrasion or cutting

of the interior surfaces of the piping. Tools that minimize abrasion

and cutting of piping are commercially available, and should be specifie<

for cleaning.

Alternative approaches to drain cleaning, e.g. , the use of compressed

air or hydraulic jets, could further reduce the danger of inadvertent

internal abrasion and cutting.

System designs using fittings, materials and configurations conforming

to current generally accepted good practice for drainage should not

be subject to significant damage from abrasion or cutting from cleaning

tools generally recognized by the trade as appropriate to the particular

cleaning task and piping material.

92
CONCLUSIONS

STATUS AND BENEFITS OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY FOR

PIPING MATERIALS IN RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING

(a) Essential qualitative performance requirements are recommended

herein, and a number of specific parameters have been identified

that could be used as quantitative measures of conformance to

the requirements.

(b) Some of the characteristics of selected thermoplastics have

been considered in this study to illustrate the development

of performance evaluation methodology for piping materials.

93
This choice should not be taken to indicate either superiority

of inferiority of the thermoplastics, compared to traditional

materials. The characteristics of any piping material could

have been chosen for illustrative purposes.

(c) A total of 16 performance statements have been presented,

as summarized in Table 4. Of these, nine (9) are recommended

for use as general evaluation methods in considering the

acceptance of thermoplastic piping in jurisdictions where

the application is not already proven through satisfactory

service history. Several statements are not sufficiently

complete or proven to recommend for general use at this time,

but may be useful as guides for establishing the format for

information submitted by proponents of innovative piping

materials, and for the review of such information. These

latter statements await further work to develop suitable

test methods before they can be considered complete.

Discussion only is provided for two statements as an aid in

defining the research required to develop the necessary

quantification and reproducible test methods. The need for

prescriptive product standards for quality control is not

lessened by the development of performance criteria. Rather

the performance criteria complement, or supplement,

the prescriptive product standards, and may be useful

in indicating areas in which the product standards

might need further development, expansion or improvement.

(d) The work described in this report should aid the planning

of systematic evaluations of future innovative piping

materials proposed for use in plumbing systems. It should

help to reduce the time required for evaluation and acceptance.

For some materials, research and test development might be

required for relevant criteria not investigated in this

study.

94
95
96
97
(e) The approach used in this report should also be useful for:

(i) Facilitating acceptance decisions in jurisdictions

which have not yet approved thermoplastics for above

ground residential plumbing,

(ii) Facilitating better quality of design, installation and

inspection through analysis of the important performance

requirements and referencing of proper methods,

(iii) Providing general guidance in the approach to be taken

in the review of suggestions and proposals for the use" of new piping materials or for new applications of

traditional materials not studied in the present

investigation.

6.2 GENERAL ADEQUACY OF THERMOPLASTIC PIPING FOR RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING

Within the scope of this study, the findings indicate that ABS and

PVC DWV piping, and CPVC water piping conforming to applicable ASTM

and NSF standards should be adequate in a number of residential plumbing

applications; provided that generally accepted good practice is

employed in design and installation and that other applicable design

and installation recommendations given herein are followed. Generally,

the approving authority should find the applicable criteria presented

herein useful in evaluating new piping materials or new applications

for which service history is inadequate. The survey of current usage

reported in Section 2 provides an up-to-date summary of allowable uses

for thermoplastics for potable water supply and distribution, and

for sanitary drainage and venting, as recommended by the model codes

and a number of regulatory authorities.

The evaluation of toxicological factors relating to leachates from

piping and of the structural criteria for underground piping were beyond

the scope of this study; however, see sections 6.7 and 6.8 for considerations

that might be involved in surveillance of these areas in the future.

98
6.3 FIRE SAFETY

(a) Plumbing walls and chases should be required to meet the

applicable fire safety criteria for similar walls and chases

not containing plumbing.

(b) One-hour fire rated walls containing ABS and PVC DWV piping

may be expected to meet the one-hour fire endurance critiera

when all the following conditions are satisfied.

1. The annular openings around the laterals penetrating

the walls are sealed.

2. The wall cavity depth is 5 1/2 inches or more.

3. Soil and waste stacks are either 2 or 3 inches diameter.^

(c) Further studies may be needed for the development of adequate

fire performance tests and data from such tests for plumbing

assemblies in high rise buildings, for plumbing penetrating

floor - ceilings, and for lateral configurations significantly

unlike those used in this study. All the metallic systems

evaluated in the test program met the fire spread criterion

and the criterion for temperature rise on the unexposed wall

surface for one hour. The tests did not address the fire

performance of DWV systems in high rise construction, nor

of DWV piping penetrating floor-ceiling assemblies.

(d) There is a need for developing a suitable, reproducible

test procedure for quantitative measurements of smoke and

gas accumulation in unexposed rooms adjacent to a fire and

for establishing suitable performance levels.

6.4 THERMAL PERFORMANCE

Two tests are recommended for thermal properties that might affect

long-term stability of dimensions and strength of PVC, ABS, CPVC, and

PB. These are as follows:

(a) A "residual stress indicator", computed from glass transition

temperature measurements.

(b) An oven test.

In the tests reported herein, a 4-inch

cavity met the one-hour fire endurance

99

PVC stack in a 9 1/2 inch

criteria.
In general, hardness and its temperature coefficient may be useful in

predicting relative resistance of piping materials to impact fracture

at different temperatures. A test providing for intermittent exposure

of a representative assembly to hot water should be utilized in conjunction

with the tests recommended above. Hot water tests have been described,

but these are not yet standardized.

It is believed that a realistic limitation of angular deflection

between supports, either intermittent or permanent, would be arctan

0. 01^, and that permanent length change should not exceed 0.5% during

and following exposure to 100,000 cycles of exposure to hot water

(or a sufficient number of cycles to achieve dimensional stability,

1. e. no further measurable change).

Additional work is needed to establish a suitable standard hot water

exposure test. This test should be correlated with the oven test, with

the test for hardness and its temperature coefficient, and with the test

for residual stress indicator.

6.5 RESISTANCE TO SHOCK PRESSURE

A simulated "water hammer" test was developed for experimentation with

CPVC that involves the application of 350,000 cycles of shock pressure

produced by a closed loop electro-hydraulic machine programmed to generate

a predetermined pressure "spike" with appropriate magnitude, duration and

frequency. A frequency of application not greater than 2 Hz is recommended

for test purposes with a spike duration of approximately 0.16s.

Results with this test on 1/2 in CPVC water tubing showed that a "fatigue life" curve of number of cycles to failure vs magnitude of

shock pressure can be established for a given test temperature. The

number of pulses to produce failure decreases as temperature is

increased.

Equivalent to 1/8 in/ft, approximately.

100
At a temperature of 180°F (82°C), a temperature higher than the

usual residential hot water service temperature, the 1/2 in CPVC

tubing did not fail with the application of 350,000 pressure pulses

to 150 psi/1.034 MPa (static pressure plus shock pressure). If 20

pulses occur during an average day in normal household service, 350,000

pulses would occur in approximately 50 years.

The results showed that the most critical parts of the piping assemblies

tested were the fittings and the joints. It is important to follow

industry recommendations carefully in the making of joints and to use NSF -listed pipe, fittings and joint cements.

For the time being this tentative test method (which may also be

appropriate for piping materials other than CPVC) should be considerd

a leading candidate for standardization. Future work is recommended

toward this end.

6.6 ACOUSTICAL PERFORMANCE

Five criteria for acoustical performance of piping assemblies are recommended. These provide measures for noise reduction through

building elements containing plumbing and for noise level in interior

spaces during operation of the plumbing system. Measurements are made in accordance with certain American National Standards (ANS)

developed under ANSI procedures, and in accordance with certain

ASTM standards. Ihe principal areas of needed improvments are:

1. A detailed guide is needed for the hydraulic load to be

imposed in evaluating the noise level generated by

operation of the plumbing system.

2. For the evaluation of noise reduction through building

elements, work is needed to reduce dependence on testing

in the completed building. Component tests, or tests of

small assemblies in the laboratory, should be considered

National Sanitation Foundation, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

101
and the results from such tests should be correlated with

the present methods for completed buildings.

6.7 WATER QUALITY

This study did not include any investigation of water quality, per se,

in thermoplastic piping systems . (See B.1.1). The NSF protocol

(based on small specimens) was assumed adequate for the assurance

of quality in potable water systems in relation to the impartation

of bacteria, taste, odor, and toxic substances to the water

by the piping materials. Further review and improvement of

these methods may be needed if other studies should suggest that

the NSF protocol is incomplete.

6.8 FUTURE NEEDS

In addition to the recommendations or considerations given in Sections

6.4, 6.5, 6.6 and 6.7, future work is recommended in the following

areas

(a) A review of existing criteria and evaluation techniques

for underground applications of flexible piping.

(b) A review of existing criteria and evaluation techniques for

the quality of water delivered to the potable water outlets

in dwellings, as related to the piping materials.

(c) A review of the need for a manual or systematically organized

index for designers/installers/inspectors that summarizes

current generally accepted practice and indexes significant

technical data and the requirements of codes and standards

for piping. Such a manual should also include a concise

descriptive tabulation of all significant standards and

test methods for piping materials keyed to a realistic

performance matrix.

(d) A continuing program to maintain a current interface with

the industry, users, regulatory bodies and other government

102
agencies (e.g., DOC, EPA, HEW, OSHA) concerning water quality, fire

safety, code and standards developments and other issues relating to

piping systems, as appropriate. Organizations that have conducted or participated in surveys in these areas in recent years should be able

to assist in this program,

6.9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Significant contributions to the value of this report have been made

by a number of persons and organizations. Special appreciation is due

to Mr. William J. Werner, General Engineer, Office of Policy Development

and Research, Division of Energy, Building Technology and Standards,

Department of Housing and Urban Development for valuable technical

suggestions and policy guidance furnished during the course of the

work; and to Dr. Frank W. Reinhart, until recently Technical Director,

Plastics Pipe Institute, for up-to-date industry technical data on the properties of plastics piping and for current listings of applicable

standards.

Thanks are also extended to several leading plumbing engineers and

plumbing contractors for suggestions concerning scope and application

of the work, and to the staff of the nationally recognized model code

organizations for information on current code acceptance of

thermoplastic piping for various applications.

Abbreviations of certain Federal Government Agencies, as follows:

DOC = Department of Commerce

EPA = Environmental Protection Agency

HEW = Health, Education and Welfare (Department of)

OSHA = Occupational Safety and Health Administration

103

REFERENCES

Wyly, R. S. and Galowin, L. S. "An Approach to Performance Evaluation

for Water Supply and Drainage for Buildings." Paper 12,

Proceedings of the CIB Commission W62 Symposium on Drainage

and Water Supply for Buildings, Glasgow, September 1975.

(Building Services Research Unit, Department of Mechanical

Engineering, University of Glasgow, 3 Lilybank Gardens,

Glasgow W2, Scotland).

Galowin, L. S.; Downing, W. J.; Nielsen, L. S.; Orloski, M. J.;

and Wyly, R. S. "Performance Concepts for Water Supply

and Drainage Systems in Buildings". Paper II-2, Proceedings

of the CIB Commission W62 Symposium on Drainage and Water

Supply for Buildings, Washington, September 1976 (U. S.

National Committee for CIB, National Academy of Sciences,

2101 Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C. 20418

(in press )

.

Wyly, R. S.; Galowin, L. S. and Orloski, M. J. "The Evolution of

the Performance Approach in Plumbing". Proceedings of the 1976

Conference of the National Conference of the States for

Building Codes and Standards, Providence, Rhode Island,

September, 1976. National Bureau of Standards Special

Publication SP 473 (June 1977). L. C. Catalog No. 77-8273.

Wyly, R. S.; Parker, W. J.; Rorrer, D. E.; Sherlin, G. C. and

Tryon, M. "Review of Standards and Other Information on Thermoplastic Piping in Residential Plumbing." National

Bureau of Standards Building Science Series BSS 68 (May 1974).

SD Catalog No. 013.29:2/68.

Wyly, R. S. and Rorrer, D. E. "Field Test of Hydraulic Performance

of a Single-Stack Drainage System at the Operation BREAKTHROUGH

Prototype Site in King County, Washington," National Bureau

of Standards NBSIR 73-161, May 1973.

105
[6] Parker, W. J.; Paabo, M. ; Scott, J. T. ; Gross, D. and Benjamin, I. A.

"Fire Endurance of Gypsum Board Walls and Chases Containing

Plastic and Metallic Drain, Waste and Vent Plumbing Systems."

National Bureau of Standards Building Science Series BSS 72

(September 1975) SD Catalog No. C12. 29:2/72.

[7] Rorrer, D. E.; Shaver, J. R. and Wyly, R. S. "Laboratory Tests of

Thermoplastic Piping Assemblies Subjected to Water Hammer

and Intermittent Hot Water Flow." National Bureau of Standards

NBSIR 77-1261 (August 1977).

[8] Tryon, M. "Investigation of Procedures for Determination of

Thermal Performance Characteristics of Plastic Piping Used

in Housing." National Bureau of Standards NBSIR 74-610

(November, 1974). COM 75-10072/LK.

[9] Tryon, M. "Thermal Properties of Selected Plastic Piping Used

in Housing." National Bureau of Standards NBSIR 74-629

(April 1975).

[10] McJunkin, F. E. and Pinco, C. S. "The Role of Plastic Pipe in

Community Water Supplies in Developing Countries," Department

of Environmental Science and Engineering, University of

North Carolina to Agency for International Development,

Contract AID/csd-1888 Task Order No. 3, 1969, U. S.

Government Printing Office, Stock No. 4401-0033.

[11] Current Industrial Reports, U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau

of the Census: Shipments of Thermoplastics Pipe, Tube and

Fittings, Series M30F, Summaries for 1970, 1971, 1972, and 1973.

[12] Current Industrial Reports, U. S. Department of Commerce,

Bureau of the Census: Shipments of Selected Plastics Products,

Series Ma-30D for 1974 and 1975.

106
[13] Domestic Engineering (D/E Journal), "Trends in Codes and Standards

1973" Vol. 221, No. 3, March 1973.

[14] Domestic Engineering (D/E Journal) 1974 Report, "Trends in Codes

and Standards 1974" Vol. 223, No. 3, March 1974.

[15] Domestic Engineering (D/E Journal) "Trends in Codes and Standards

1975, " Vol. 225, No. 3, March 1975.

[16] Domestic Engineering (D/E Journal) "Trends in Codes and Standards

1976, " Vol. 227, No. 3, March 1976; and "Codes and Standards

1977, " Vol. 229, No. 3, March 1977.

[17] ASTM E119 "Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Building Construction

and Materials," American Society for Testing and Materials,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

[18] ASTM E84 "Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics

of Building Materials."

ASTM E162 "Standard Method of Test for Surface Flammability of

Materials Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source." American Society

for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

[19] Wilging, R. C. "The Deflection of Thermoplastic Pipe Resulting

from Thermal Cycling," paper presented at Engineered Plumbing

Exposition, American Society of Plumbing Engineers, Chicago,

Illinois, September 1970.

[20] Elevated Temperature Cycling Test, Appendix G of British Standard

4514: 1969, Specification for UPVC Soil and Ventilating

Pipe, Fittings and Accessories, British Standards Institution,

London.

[21] Hucks, R. T. Jr. "Performance of PVC Pipe in Water Distribution

Systems." Modern Plastics, September 1972.

107
[22] Dawson, F. M. and Kalinske, A. A. "Water Hammer and Noises in

Water - Piping Systems," Chapter VIII of Water-Supply

Piping for the Plumbing System. Technical Bulletin No. 3,

National Association of Master Plumbers, 1942.

[23] Special Report to AWWA Relative to PVC Pipe, Plastics Pipe

Institute, 355 Lexington Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017.

[24] Pfrang, E. 0. "An Overview of Operation BREAKTHROUGH Guide

Criteria." NBS Report 10319, August 1972. (National Technical

Information Service, Springfield, Va. 22151).

[25] Pfrang, E. 0. "Guide Criteria for the Evaluation of Operation

BREAKTHROUGH Housing Systems" (5 volume set). NBS Report

10200. (National Technical Information Service, Springfield,

Va. 22151).

108
8. APPENDIX

8.1 Definitions and Nomenclature

ABS : Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene , a thermoplastic material used in

drain, waste and vent piping systems and also for shallow-well water

piping and for gas distribution. The minimum content of each

component is: Acrylonitri le , 13 percent; butadiene, 5 percent;

and styrene and/or substituted styrene, 15 percent.

Administrative Authority : The individual official, board, department,

or agency established and authorized by a state, county, city or other political subdivision created by law to administer and

enforce the provisions of the plumbing code as adopted or amended.

(NSPC)

Aging : The effect on materials of exposure to an environment for an interval of time; also, the process of exposing materials to an environment for an interval of time. (ASTM)

Chase : In plumbing usage, a shaft constructed specifically to enclose

the plumbing piping in a fire-resistant construction.

Definitions found in this section are intended to be identical, insofar

as feasible, with those identified by the abbreviations (ASTM), (NSPC),

and (PPI). For those definitions listed but not identified by one of

the abreviations , either some modifications have been made to the

definitions given by ASTM, NSPC or PPI, or the definitions may have

been found elsewhere in the technical literature.

(ASTM) - American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM D883

(NSPC) - National Standard Plumbing Code, 1975

(PPI) - Plastics Pipe Institute, PPI-TRI-November 1968.

109
Code : As related to plumbing work, usually an ordinance, with any

subsequent amendment thereto, or any emergency rules or regulations

which a city or governing body may adopt to control the plumbing

work within its jurisdiction.

CPVC : Chlorinated poly (vinyl chloride), a thermoplastic material used

for piping in hot and cold water distribution systems.

DWV System : The drain-waste-vent system; includes all the sanitary

drainage and vent piping inside the building or relevant portion

thereof, and includes the building drain to its point of

connection with the building sewer.

Fitting : A device used to join or to terminate sections of pipe.

Horizontal Branch : A horizontal branch is a drain pipe extending

laterally from a soil or waste stack or building drain with or without vertical sections or branches, which receives the

discharge from one or more fixture drains and conducts it to

the soil or waste stack or to the building drain.

Lateral : A word that has appeared in recent reports on fire tests of

plastic plumbing systems. It is synonymous with "fixture

drain", "trap arm" or "horizontal branch" as defined in

standard plumbing terminology.

Pipe : The term is applied generally to tubular products and materials

commonly used to conduct or transport liquids or gases. In this

specific nomenclature, "pipe" usually has greater wall thickness

than similar products called "tube" or "tubing".

Piping : This term has a broader meaning than the term "pipe". For

example, "cold water piping" includes the pipe, tube, or tubing

used to conduct the cold water; the fittings used to join individual

lengths of pipe, to change the direction of flow or change the

110
size of pipe, tube, or tubing; and the valves used to control or regulate the rate of flow and/or the direction of flow. "Hot water

piping" and "drainage piping" have similarly broad meanings.

Plastic Pipe : A hollow cylinder of a plastic material in which the

wall thickness is usually small when compared to the diameter and

in which the inside and outside walls are essentially concentric.

See plastic tubing. (ASTM)

Plastic Tubing : A particular size of plastic pipe in which the outside

diameter is essentially the same as that of copper tubing. See

plastic pipe. (ASTM)

Polybutylene Plastics : Plastics based on polymers made with butene

as essentially the sole monomer. (ASTM)

Polyethylene : A polymer prepared by the polymerization of ethylene

as the sole monomer. See polyehtylene plastics. (ASTM)

Polyethylene Plastics : Plastics based on polymers made with ethylene

as essentially the sole monomer. Note: In common usage for

these plastics, "essentially" means no less than 85% ethylene

and no less than 95% total olefins. (ASTM)

Polymer : A compound formed by the reaction of simple molecules having

functional groups that permit their combination to proceed to

high molecular weights under suitable conditions. Polymers may

be formed by polyaddition (addition polymer) or polycondensation

(condensation polymer). When two or more monomers are involved,

the product is called a copoljrmer.

Polymerization : A chemical reaction in which the molecules of a monomer

are linked together to form large molecules whose molecular

weight is a multiple of that of the original substance. When

111
two or more monomers are involved, the process is called

copolymerization or heteropol3mierization. (PPI)

Poly (vinyl chloride) : A resin prepared by the polymerization of vinyl

chloride with or without the addition of small amounts of other

monomers. (PPI)

Poly (vinyl chloride) Plastics : Plastics made by combining poly(vinyl

chloride) with colorants, fillers, plasticizers , stabilizers,

lubricants, other polymers, and other compounding ingredients.

Not all of these modifiers are used in pipe compounds. (PPI)

Potable Water : Water free from impurities present in amounts sufficient

to cause disease or harmful physiological effects and conforming

in its bacteriological and chemical quality to the requirements

of the Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards or the

regulations of the public health authority having jurisdiction.

(NSPC)

Pressure : When expressed with reference to pipe, the force per unit area exerted by the fluid in the pipe.

Stack: The vertical main of a system of soil, waste or vent piping.

Thermoplastic (noun) : A plastic which is thermoplastic in behavior. (PPI)

Thermoplastic (adjective) : Capable of being repeatedly softened by

increase of temperature and hardened by decrease of temperature.

Note: Thermoplastic applies to those materials whose change

upon heating is substantially physical. (PPI)

Theirmoset (noun) : A plastic which, when cured by application of heat

or chemical means, changes into a substantially infusible and

insoluble product. (PPI)

112
Thermoset (adjective) : Pertaining to the state of a resin in which

it is relatively infusible. (PPI)

Thermosetting : Capable of being changed into a substantially infusible

or insoluble product when cured by application of heat or chemical

means. (PPI)

Trap: A fitting or device constructed in a drain so as to provide, when

properly vented, a water seal for protection against the emission

of sewer gases, without significantly retarding the flow of

sewage or waste water through it.

Trap Arm : The horizontal drain extending from a trap to its vent or

to the first connection to another drain, whichever comes first.

Vent : A pipe installed to provide a flow of air to or from a drainage

system or element thereof so as to provide protection of trap

seals from siphonage and back pressure.

Vinyl Chloride Plastics : Plastics based on resins made by the polymerization of vinyl chloride or copolymerization of vinyl chloride

with other unsaturated compounds, the vinyl chloride being in

greatest amount by weight. (PPI)

Water Distribution (distributing) Pipe : A pipe within the building

or on the premises which conveys water from the water-service

pipe to the point of usage. (NSPC)

Water Hammer : The term used to identify the hammering noises and severe shocks that may occur in a pressurized water supply

when flow is halted abruptly by the rapid closure of a valve

or faucet.

Water Outlet : A discharge opening through which water is supplied

to a plumbing fixture or plumbing appliance to a boiler or

113
heating system, or to any devices or equipment requiring water

to operate but which are not part of the plumbing system.

Water Service Pipe : The pipe from the water main or other source of

potable water supply to the water distributing system of the

building served. (NSPC)

8.2 MODEL CODES, SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS

8.1.2 Model Plumbing Codes

Basic Plumbing Code (BPC)

Building Officials and Code Administrators International (BOCA)

1313 East 60 Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637.

National Standard Plumbing Code (NSPC)

National Association of Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors

(NAPHCC) and American Society of Plumbing Engineers (ASPE)

1016 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036

Standard Plumbing Code (SPC)

Southern Building Code Congress International (SBCC)

3617 8th Avenue South, Birmingham, Alabama 35222

Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC)

International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials

(lAPMO) 5032 Alhambra Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90032

114
8.2.2 Specifications and Standards

This section contains a partial list of widely-referenced thermoplastics

piping standards including standards for raw materials; finished pipe

and fittings; methods of test; and recommended practices for the

design and installation of pipe and fittings, and of piping systems

made of thermoplastics. Those standards marked with an asterisk (*)

contain information on engineering design criteria and/or the closely

related installation procedures. The years of issue are not generally

given; however, in each instance the applicable date may be taken as the most recent issue date of the specification or standard prior to

the publication date of this report.

The standards listed below are limited to those relating to ABS,

CPVC, PB, PE, PP and PVC, in the context of the most likely plumbing

applications in housing systems. Section 2 of this report provides

general information on the status of approvals of several thermoplastic

piping materials for various applications. Persons who may be considering

the use of a thermoplastic piping material for a particular application

in a particular community should consult the local approving authority

for the current status of approvals in that community.

For a more comprehensive listing of Standards relating to plastics

piping, the reader is referred to:

1. Chapter 14 of the Plastics Piping Manual , K. C. Ford and

F. W. Reinhart, First Edition (1976). Obtainable from the

Plastics Pipe Institute, 355 Lexington Avenue, New York,

N.Y. 10017.

2. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 34 - Plastic Pipe

(current issue). Obtainable from the American Society for

Testing and Materials, 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pa.

19103.

115
Selected standards for the purpose of this report are listed below

according to issuing organization (source).

ASTM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ^^

American Society for Testing and Materials

1916 Race Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

For the purposes of this report, the ASTM Standards are divided into

groups as follows:

1. Specifications for Plastics Pipe, Fittings, and Related Materials

A) Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS)

D1527 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS) Plastic Pipe,

Schedules 40 and 80.

D1788 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS) Plastics.

(ANS K65.205)

D2282 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS) Plastic Pipe

(SDR-PR). (ANS B72.3)

D2465 Threaded Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS)

Plastic Pipe Fittings, Schedule 80. (ANS K65.165)

D2468 Socket-Type Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS)

Plastic Pipe Fittings, Schedule 40. (ANS K65.164)

Standards having an "ANS" designation (shown here in parentheses)

have been approved by the American National Standards Institute,

1430 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 10018

116
D2469 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS) Plastic Pipe

Fittings, Schedule 80. (ANS K65.163)

D2661 *Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS) Plastic

Drain, Waste and Vent Pipe and Fittings. (ANS B72.18)

D2751 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS) Sewer Pipe and

Fittings. (ANS K65.59)

D3311 Drain, Waste and Vent (DWV) Plastic Fittings Patterns

F409 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Syrene (ABS) and Poly

(vinyl chloride) (PVC) Accessible and Replaceable

Plastic Tube and Tubular Fittings

B) Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC)

D1784 Rigid Poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) Compounds and

Chlorinated Poly(vinyl chloride) (CPVC) Compounds

D1785 Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe, Schedules

40, 80, and 120. (ANS B72.7) (includes CPVC 4116)

D2241 Poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe. (SDR-PR)

(ANS B72.2)

D2464 Threaded Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe

Fittings, Schedule 40. (ANS K65.166)

D2466 Socket-type Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) Plastic

Pipe Fittings, Schedule 40.

D2467 Socket-type Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) Plastic

Pipe fittings. Schedule 80.

117
D2665 *Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) Plastic Drain, Waste,

and Vent Pipe and Fittings. (ANS K65.56)

D2729 PolyCvinyl chloride) (PVC) Sewer Pipe and Fittings

D2740 PolyCvinyl chloride) (PVC) Plastic Tubing (ANS B72.22)

D2836 Filled PolyCvinyl chloride) CPVC) Sewer Pipe

D2949 Three-Inch Thin Wall PolyCvinyl chloride) CPVC)

Plastic Drain, Waste, and Vent Pipe and Fittings.

D3033 Type PSP PolyCvinyl chloride) Sewer Pipe and Fittings.

D3034 Type PSM PolyCvinyl chloride) Sewer Pipe and Fittings.

C) Chlorinated PolyCvinyl chloride) CCPVC)

D1784 Rigid PolyCvinyl chloride) CPVC) Compounds and

Chlorinated PolyCvinyl chloride) (CPVC) Compounds

D2846 *Chlorinated PolyCvinyl chloride) CCPVC) Plastic

Hot Water Distribution Systems.

D) Polyethylene CPE)

D1248 Polyethylene Plastics Molding and Extrusion Materials.

D2104 Polyethylene CPE) Plastic Pipe, Schedule 40. CANS B72.8)

D2239 Polyethylene CPE) Plastic Pipe. CSDR-PR) CANS B72.1)

D2447 Polyethylene CPE) Plastic Pipe, Schedules 40 and 80

Based on Outisde Diameter. CANS B72.13)

118
D2609 Plastic Insert Fittings for Polyethylene (PE) Plastic

Pipe.

D2610 Butt Fusion Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe Fittings,

Schedule 40. (ANS K65.160)

D2611 Butt Fusion Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe Fittings,

Schedule 80. (ANS K65.159)

D2683 Socket-Type Polyethylene (PE) Fittings for SDR 11.0

Polyethylene Pipe.

D2737 Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Tubing.

D3035 Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe (SDR-PR) Based on Controlled Outside Diameter.

D3197 Insert -type Polyethylene Fusion Fittings for SDR

11.0 Polyethylene Pipe.

D3261 Butt Heat Fusion Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Fittings

for Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe and Tubing.

D3350 Polyethylene Plastics (PE) Pipe and Fittings Materials.

E) Polybutylene (PB)

D2581 Polybutylene (PB) Plastics

D3309 Polybutylene (PB) Plastic Hot Water Distribution

Systems

119
2. Specifications for Plastic Piping Solvent Cements and Joints

D2235 *Solvent Cement for Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene

(ABS) Plastic Pipe and Fittings. (ANS B72.23)

D2564 * Solvent Cements for Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC

Plastic Pipe and Fittings. (ANS B72.16)

D3138 *Solvent Cements for Joining Acrylonitrile-ButadieneStyrene (ABS) Pipe and Fittings to Poly(vinyl chloride)

(PVC) Pipe and Fittings for Non-Pressure Applications.

D31 39 Joints for Plastic Pressure Pipes Using Flexible

Elastomeric Seals

D3212 Joints for Drain and Sewer Plastic Pipes Using

Flexible Elastomeric Seals

3. Methods of Test of Thermoplastic Pipe and Tubing

D1598 Time -to -Failure of Plastic Pipe Under Long-Term

Hydrostatic Pressure. (ANS B72.6)

D1599 Short -Time Rupture Strength of Plastic Pipe, Tubing

and Fittings. (ANS K65.53)

D21 22 Determining Dimensions of Thermoplastic Pipe and

Fittings.

D2152 Quality of Extruded Poly(vinyl chloride) Pipe by

Acetone Immersion. (ANS B72.9)

D2290 Apparent Tensile Strength of Ring or Tubular Plastics

by Split Disk Method.

120
D2412 *External Loading Properties of Plastic Pipe by

Parallel-Plate Loading. (ANS B72.il)

D2444 Impact Resistance of Thermoplastic Pipe and Fittings

by Means of a Tup (Falling Weight) (ANSI SK65.169)

D2837 *Obtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic

Pipe Materials. (ANS K65.153)

D2924 External Pressure Resistance of Plastic Pipe.

Recommended Practices

D215 3 ^Calculating Stress in Plastic Pipe Under Internal

Pressure. (ANS B72.10)

D2321 ^Underground Installation of Flexible Thermoplastic

Sewer Pipe. (ANS K65.171)

D2657 *Heat Joining of Thermoplastic Pipe and Fittings.

(ANS B72.17)

D2774 *Underground Installation of Thermoplastic Pressure

Piping.

D2855 *Making Solvent Cemented Joints with Poly (vinyl

chloride) (PVC) Pipe and Fittings. (ANS K65.55)

F402 *Safe Handling of Solvent Cements Used for Joining

Thermoplastic Pipe and Fittings.

5. Definitions and Terminology

D833 Standard Definitions of Terms Relating to Plastics.

121
D2749 Standard Symbols for Dimensions of Plastic Pipe

Fittings. (ANS K65.58)

F412 Standard Definitions of Terms Relating to Plastic

Piping Systems.

6. Summary of Selected ASTM Tests

Table 5 gives a brief description of selected ASTM tests on properties of plastics and plastics pipe and fittings. Some

of these properties may be of interest in the correlation

of service performance and laboratory tests as required in

the development of viable, material-dependent, performance

tests for piping systems.

122
Table 5, Brief Description of Selected A3TM

Tests on Properties of Plastics* and

of Plastics Pipe, Tube and Fittings

Designation Property Measured Nature of Test

D 256 Impact resistance (lzoi> Energy required to break notched

specimen is determined.

D543 Resistance to chemical

reagents

Changes in weight, dimensions,

appearance and selected strength

properties of prepared specimens

are determined after immersion for

7 days in specified standard

^ reagents at a temperature of 23 C.

D 621 Deformation mder load Deformation in compression after 2h

hours is determined.

D 638 Tensile properties Tensile stress is determined as a function of strain, at one or more

rates of strain.

D 61+8 Deflection temperature

under load

The temperature at which a beam speci- men deflects a specified amount under

a given load with gradually increasing

temperature is determined.

D 671

D 695

Flexural fatigue

Compressive properties

Resistance to deterioration from cyclic

stress is determined from machines flat

specimens. Cycles-to-f ailure are determined at several different stress

amplitudes at a frequency of 30 Hz.

Compressive strength is calculated as the stress required to cause rupture

or to deform specimen a given percentage

of its thickness.

D 696 Coefficient of linear

thermal expansion

The change in length of a cylindrical

specimen is measured while heating and

while cooling, using a specified apparatus. The coefficient of linear

expansion is calculated as the average

of the values obtained for heating and

cooling.

D 732 Shear strength Shear strength is calculated from the

load required to punch a hole in the

specimen.

123
Table 5. Brief Description of Selected ASTM

Tests on Properties of Plastics, and

of Plastics Pipe, Tube and Fittings- -Continued

Designation Property Measured. Nature of Test

Brittleness temperature

by impact

A specified impact is applied to cantilevered specimens at various temperatures. The brittleness temperature is

that temperature at which ^0% of the

specimens fail.

D 7^7 Stiffness Angular deflection is determined as a function of load, and stiffness in

flexure is calculated.

D 756 Resistance to accelerated service conditions

Weight change of samples of interest

is determined after oven heating in

accordance with specified temperatures

and cyclic exposure. Physical properties

of interest may be determined before,

during and/or after exposure.

D 785 Rockwell hardness Indentation by a spherical impressor

under load is determined.

D 790 Flexural properties Flexural strength is determined as the

load at fail\ire, or as flexural stress

at 5% strain.

D 793

D 79^

Short-tine stability at elevated temperatures

Permanent effect of heat

The quantity of hydrogen chloride

evolved from a 10 g cut or shredded

specimens: of plastic containing chlorine

during heating for 30 minutes at a temperature of 180°C is determined by

specified chemical means. Effect of oven heating on properties

of interest is observed. Applicable

to cut specimens as well as molded

parts in finished form.

D Q6k Coefficient of cubical

thermal expansion

The volume change of a cylindrical

specimen immersed in mercury is determined on heating and on cooling. The

coefficient of cubical expansion is

calculated as the average of the values

for heating and cooling.

D 953 Bearing strength

124

Bearing strength of sheet specimens

in compression or tension is determined at k% deformation. The relationship between bearing stress and

defonnation, as measured by a specified procedure, is obtained.
Table 5. Brief Description of Selected ASTM

Tests on Properties of Plastics, and

of Plastics Pipe, Tube and Fittings —Continued

Designation Property Measured Nature of Test

D 10k3 Stiffness properties

in torsion

Angular rotation of a rectangular

specimen is determined within the

range 5-100 deg of arc for rigici

materials and 10-100 deg for rigid

materials. Determinations are made

at different temperatures. Modulus of

rigidity is calciilated for each

temperature, and the relationship of

modiolus of rigidity and temperature is

det ermined

.

D 1180 Bursting strength of

tubing

The internal pressure resulting in

rupture of prescribed lengths of plastic tubing subjected to pressure

increasing at a specified rate at a

a temperature of 23 °C is determined.

D 1299 Shrinkage at elevated

temperature

Thickness change in disk specimens

of molded and laminated thermosetting

plastics is determined after heating

for a specified period of time at a specified temperature between 70 °C and

230 °C. The minimum period of heating

shall be that for which shrinkage equals

or exceeds 0.25 mm, as measured with a specified apparatus. The method provides a means of classifying plastics

with respect to shirnkage on a relative

basis

.

D 1435 Outdoor weathering Cut or molded specimens are exposed out- doors, facing south and tilted 45°. Changes in properties of interest are determined

.

D 1525 Softening temperature (Vicat) Penetration of a flat-ended penetrator

under gradually increasing temperature

is measured. Softening point is the

temperature at which 1 mm penetration

occurs

.

D 1598 Long-term strength of

pipe under internal

hydrostatic pressure

Time-to-failure of pipe specimens at constant pressure is measured. The

relationship between pressure and timeto-failure is established. Hoop stress

at failure is calculated.

125
Table 5. Brief Description of Selected ASTM

Tests on Properties of Plastics, and of Plastics Pipe, Tube and Fittings

Cont inued

Designation Property Measured Nature of Test

D 1599 Short-time strength

of pipe under internal

hydrostatic press\ire

The pressure at which pipe specimens are ruptured is determined by continuously

increasing the internal pressure over a time interval not greater than TO seconds. Hoop stress at failure is calculated.

D 1693 Environmental stress cracking

Annealed and conditioned specimens are nicked and then placed in a reagent and held at 50° C. Time to first crack and percentage of failures (cracks) are re- ported.

D 1708 Tensile properties Yield strength, tensile strength, tensile

strength at break, percentage elongation at break and percentage elongation at yield

point are determined for small cut or machined specimens. The speed of testing

is chosen such that the rate of straining

is approximately the same as that obtained

where the material is tested according to ASTM D 638 for larger specimens.

D 1822 Tensile impact strength Energy required to break specimen in tension by impact is determined.

D 1939 Residual stress Excess residual stress ±n extruded or molded Acrylonitr ile-Butadiene-Styrene

(ABS) parts is indicated by the presence

of cracking of the specimen after 30 and

120 seconds immersion in glacial acetic

acid at a temperature of 23 °C. Specifications are given for preparation of specimens

for the aparatus and for the procedure.

D 2105 Longitudinal tensile

properties

Tensile load and elapsed time for a strain of 0.02 is measured in an apparatus

that subjects pipe specimens to con- tinuously increasing longitudinal tension

at a specified grip separation velocity.

Calculations are made of tensile strength,

elongation, rates of stressing and straining, and elastic modulus.

D 2115 Oven heat stability Relative thermal stability of sheet or molded poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) compounds

is determined by discoloration due to exposure at an elevated temperature in a con- trolled oven. Sheet specimens of specified

dimensions are exposed to an oven temperature

of 177 °C (351 °F) unless another temperature

is specified. Observation of discoloration

and other visible changes are made at selected periodic intervals.

126
Table 5. Brief Description of Selected ASTM

Tests on Properties of Plastics, and

of Plastics Pipe, Tube and Fittings —Continued

Designation Property Measured Nature of Test

D 2143 Cyclic internal pressure

Strength

The number of pressure cycles to failure,

hoop stress at failure and statistical

correlation coefficient are determined for

a sample of thermosetting plastic pipe

comprising at least twelve specimens. A prescribed apparatus is utilized, designed

to produce 25 pressure cycles per minute.

The peak test pressures shall be adjusted

to different levels so that three specimens

fail at a cycle count in excess of 10-^ cycles; three in excess of 10^ cycles;

three in excess of 10^; and three in excess

of 10^. The test is suitable for application at any realistic temperature.

D 2152 Resistance to acetone Swelling, flaking or disintegration is

observed for PVC specimens immersed in

anhydrous acetone solution for 20 minutes^

D 2236 Dynamic mechanical properties The elastic and nonelastic components

of the complex modulus of plastics of

logarithmic mean equal to or less than 1 are determined by means of a torsional pendulum

technique utilizing rectangular or cylindrical specimens of specified dimensions.

D 221+0 Durometer hardness Indentation hy a pointed indentor is

measured.

D 2290 Tensile Strength Apparent tensile strength of tublar

plastic products is determined for ringshape specimens subjected to circumferential stress by a machine having a constant rate of crosshead movement and

a load indicator. Tests are made at a machine speed of 2.5 mm/minute for fiberreinforced thermoset specimens and 12.7

mm/minute for extruded of molded specimens.

Yield and ultimate loads are measured and

corresponding stresses calculated.

D 2412 External loading properties

of pipe

The load and deflection of a plastic pipe

specimen at cracking during the application

of a compressive load by means of parallel

flat steel plates with an approach speed of

1/2 inch per minute at a temperature of 23°

C are determined by the use of a specified

testing machine. Pipe deflection, in

percent, and "stiffness" factor are calculated from formulae provided.

127
Table 5. Brief Description of Selected ASTM

Tests on Properties of Plastics, and

of Plastics Pipe, Tube and Fittings —Continued

Designation Property Measured Nature of Test

D 2444 Impact resistance of pipe

and fittings

D 2445 Thermal oxidative stability

D 2552 Environmental stress rupture

D 2583 Indentation hardness by

barcol impressor

The energy required to produce failure in

thermoplastic pipe or fittings is determined under specified conditions of impact

by means of a tup (falling weight). Median

impact resistance is determined with 20 test specimens of each sample. The apparatus,

procedure and method of calculation are

specified.

Resistance of propylene plastics to oxidation is measured when exposed to oxygen

at 150 °C. Additional evaluations may be

made at other temperatures between 100 and

150 °C. Total exposure time for pellet

specimens to become embrittled is determined.

The results provide an indication of relative

degree of stabilization. The method is con- sidered an accelerated test. The apparatus

and procedure are prescribed.

Susceptibility of type III polyethylene

to mechanical failure under certain conditions

of load and environment is determined.

Specimens of prescribed dimensions are cut from molded sheet, and exposed to a constant

load in tension in the presence of a surfaceactive agent. The elapsed time to failure

is observed. The test is considered applicable

to other types of plastics. The specified

surface-active reagent, Igepal CO-630, is considered to yield results indicative of

what may be expected from a wide variety of

other substances which are not absorbed

appreciably by the polymer. The apparatus

and procedure are specified.

Indentation hardness of both reinforced

and nonreinforced rigid plastics is determined by the use of a specified impressor

apparatus according to a particular procedure

The apparatus is calibrated for hardness values

ranging up to 100 for the hardest materials

(eg. glass).

D 2586 Hydrostatic compressive Compressive strenth properties of filamentstrength of cylinders wound glass reinforced plastic cylinders of

specified dimensions are determined. Compressive strength is calculated from the

value of external hydrostatic pressure at collapse. The method is considered useful

in manufacturing quality control programs.

The apparatus and procedure are specified.

128
Table 5. Brief Description of Selected ASTM

Tests on Properties of Plastics, and

of Plastics Pipe, Tube and Fittings--Continued

Designation Property Measured

D 2837 Hydrostatic design basis

D 2924 External pressure resistance of pipe

D 2925 Beam deflection of pipe

D 2990 Creep

D 2991 Stress relaxation

129

Natiire of Test

A method is described for obtaining hydrostatic design basis for thermoplastic pipe,

utilizing long-term internal hydrostatic

strength data obtained by ASTM method

D 1598. The extrapolated stress at 100,000

hours is categorized to give the hydrostatic

design basis for the pipe material.

The resistance of reinforced thermosetting

plastic pipe to external pressure is determined. A specimen is loaded to failure in

a short time interval by means of continuously

increasing external fluid pressure. Fluid is maintained inside the pipe specimen, and change in inside volume is monitored.

Failure pressure, type of failure and time to failure are determined. Buckling and com- pressive scaling constants are calculated

for specimens that fail by buckling and collapse, respectively. The apparatus and procedure are specified.

The deflection as a function of time of a specimen of reinforced plastic pipe supported as a simple beam while carrying full bore flow of water at an elevated temperature is determined. The procedure is considered applicable to other test media

as well. The EI values are calculated

from the deflection data and the pipe dimensions. The test is continued for 1000 hours or until the deflection exceeds 12.7 mm (1/2 in.) or does not increase by more

than 0.025 mm (0.001 in.) in two consecutive

24-hour periods. The apparatus and pro- cedure are specified.

Methods are given for measuring the extension

or compression of plastics as a function of time-to-rupture or failure of a specimen

subject to constant tensile or compressive

load under specified environmental conditions. The apparatus and procedures are

specified.

A method is given for determining determining

the time dependence of stress (stress relaxation) of plastics resisting long-duration

constant strains at conditions of constant temperature and relative humidity and negligible vibration. Stress and strain

as a function of time are determined at intervals for 1000 hours following the application of a pre-selected load or strain. Apparatus, test specimens and procedure are

specified.
Table 5. Brief Description of Selected ASTM

Tests on Properties of Plastics, and

of Plastics Pipe, Tube and Fittings—Continued

Designation Property Measured Nature of Test

D 2992 Hydrostatic design basis

for pipe and fittings

Two alternative procedures are given for

obtaining a hydrostatic design basis for

reinforced thermosetting resin pipe,

fittings, and piping systems. The experimental basis for Procedure A is ASTM D 2143

(cyclic pressure strength) . The experimental basis for Procedure B is ASTM D 1598

(long-term hydrostatic strength). Methods

are given for extrapolation to 150 x 10^

cycles (11.4 years) of a log-log plot of

the linear regression line for hoop stress versus cycles to failure (Procedure A) , and

to 100,000 hours of a log-log linear

regression line for hoop stress versus time-to-failure (Procuedure B) . The hydrostatic design stress is obtained by multiplying the hydrostatic design basis (as

determined from Procedure A or B) by a service (design) factor. The pressure rating

is calculated from the hydrostatic design

stress value by means of the ISO hoop

stress formula, taking into account the

pipe diameter and wall thickness.

130
Federal Specifications

Specifications Sales (3FRSBS)

Building 197

Washington Naval Yard

General Services Administration

Washington, D.C. 20407

L-F-1546a Fittings, Plastic Pipe (Adapters, Couplings, Elbows,

and Tees for Polyethylene Pipe)

L- P- 315c Pipe, Plastic (Polyethylene, PE, SDR- PR)

L- P- 320b Pipe and Fittings, Plastic (PVC, Drain, Waste and

Vent)

L- P- 322b Pipe and Fittings, Plastic (ABS, Drain, Waste and

Vent)

Department of Defense Military Standards

Commanding Officer

Naval Publications and Forms Center

5108 Tabor Avenue

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19120

MIL-A-22010A( 1) Adhesive, Solvent-Type, Polyvinyl Chloride

MIL-P-14529B Pipe, Extruded, Thermoplastic

MIL-P-22011A Pipe Fittings, Plastic, Rigid, High Impact, Polyvinyl

Chloride, (PVC) and Poly 1, 2, - Dichloroethylene

MIL-P-22634A Pipe and Pipe Fittings, Polyethylene, for Low-Pressure

Waste and Drainage Systems

131
MIL-P-82056(1

)

Pipe and Pipe Fittings, Plastic, for Drain, Waste

and Vent Service

NBS Product Standards

Note: NBS Product Standards for thermoplastic pipe listed below

are no longer available . The corresponding ASTM standard

and the related American National standard are provided

here for cross-reference.

NBS Product Standard PSlO-69 Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe

(Schedule 40-Inside Diameter Dimensions). (ASTM D 2104; ANS

B 72.8)

NBS Product Standard PSll-69 Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe

(SDR). (ASTM D 2239; ANS B 72.1)

NBS Product Standard PS12-69 Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe

(Schedules 40 and 80 - Outside Diameter Dimensions). (ASTM

D 2447; ANS B 72.13)

NBS Product Standard PS 18-69 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS)

Plastic Pipe (Schedules 40 and 80). (ASTM D 1527; ANS B 72.5)

NBS Product Standard PS 19-69 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS)

Plastic Pipe (Standard Dimension Ratio). (ASTM D 2282; ANS B72.3)

NBS Product Standard PS 21-70 Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) Plastic

Pipe (Schedules 40, 80 and 120). (ASTM D 1785; ANS B72.7)

NBS Product Standard PS 22-70 Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) Plastic

Pipe (Standard Dimension Ratio) (ASTM D2241; ANS B72.72)

132
FHA/HUD

Materials Acceptance Section, FTEX

Federal Housing Administration

Washington, D.C. 20412

1. Use-of Materials Bulletins

FHA UM-26c *Styrene-Rubber Plastic Drain and Sewer Pipe and

Fittings

FHA UM-31e ^Polyethylene Plastic Pipe and Fittings for Domestic

Water Service

FHA UM-41a PVC Plastic Pipe and Fittings for Domestic Water

Service

FHA UM-43 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Plastic Pipe and

Fittings for Domestic Water Service

FHA UM-53a *Polyvinyl Chloride Plastic Drainage, Waste, and

Vent Pipe and Fittings

FHA UM-54 ABS ( Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene) Plastic

Drainage, Waste, and Vent Pipe and Fittings

FHA UM-61a (CPVC) Hot and Cold Water Distribution Systems - Chlorinated Polyvinyl Chloride

FHA UM-68 (PB) Hot and Cold Water Distribution system - Polybutylene

133
2. Minimum Property Standards

HUD Minimum Property Standards, Volume 1, One and Two Family

Dwellings, No. 4900.1

HUD Minimum Property Standards, Volume 2, Multifamily Housing,

No. 4910.1

HUD Minimum Property Standards, Volume 3, Care-Type Housing,

No. 4920.1

Note: The Minimum Property Standards are sold by the Superintendent

of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington,

D.C. 20402.

American National Standards

American National Standards Institute

1430 Broadway

New York, New York 10018

In the ANS classification plastic pipe standards are found in the B72

and the K65 series « For each standard currently cataloged in these

series there is an ASTM standard which is either identical or similar and

more recently updated. To conserve space, the standards have been listed

under the ASTM grouping with a cross reference to the ANS designation.

NSF Standards

National Sanitation Foundation

NSF Building

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

134
NSF Standard No. 14 Thermoplastic Materials, Pipe, Fittings,

Valves, Traps and Joining Materials

NSF Seal of Approval Listing of Plastic Materials, Pipe, Fittings,

and Appurtenances for Potable Water and Waste Water (NSF Testing

Laboratory) (Issued in March each year).

lAPMO Standards

International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials

5032 Alhambra Avenue

Los Angeles, California 90032

Installation Standards (IS)

IS-5 ABS Building Drain, Waste and Vent Pipe and Fittings

IS-7 Polyethylene Building Supply for Water Service and

Yard Piping

IS-8 Solvent Cemented PVC Pipe for Water Service and Yard

Piping

IS-9 PVC Building Drain, Waste and Vent Pipe and Fittings

IS-14 PVC Pipe and Fittings with Rubber Gasketed Joints

for Cold Water Service and Yard Piping

Product Standards (PS)

PS-17 Supplemental Standard to ASTM D2661 AcrylonitrileButadiene-Styrene (ABS) Plastic Drain, Waste and

Vent Pipe and Fittings and Addendum

PS-24 Polyethylene Pipe (Building Supply)

135
PS-25 Fittings for Joining Polyethylene Pipe for Water

Service and Yard Piping

PS-27 Supplemental Standard to ASTM D2665: Poly(vinyl

chloride) (PVC) Plastic Drain, Waste and Vent Pipe

and Fittings,

8.3 SOURCES OF INDUSTRY TECHNICAL INFORMATION RELATING TO THE SELECTION

OF MATERIALS AND TO THE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF THERMOPLASTIC

PIPING SYSTEMS

8.3.1 Publications of the Plastics Pipe Institute

Plastics Pipe Institute

355 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10017

PPI Technical Reports (TR)

TRl -NOV 1968 A Glossary of Plastics Piping Terms

TR2 -OCT 1968 Recommended Method for Obtaining Hydrostatic

Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe. (Replaced

by ASTM D2837)

TR3 -J UN 1975 Policies and Procedures on Developing Recommended

Hydrostatic Design Stresses for Thermoplastic Pipe

TR4 -JUN 1975 Recommended Hydrostatic Strength and Design

Stresses for Thermoplastic Compounds

TR5 -OCT 1975 List of Standards for Plastic Piping

TR6 -FEB 1968 Recommended Standard Terminology for Dimensions

of Plastic Pipe Fittings. (Replaced by ASTM D2749)

136
TR7-MAR 1968 Recommended Method for Calculation of Nominal

Weight of Plastic Pipe

TR8-APR 1968 Polyethylene Piping Installation Procedures

TR9-AUG 1973 Recommended Standard Service (Design) Factors

for Pressure Applications of Thermoplastic

Pipe Materials

TRIO--FEB 1969 Recommended Practice for Making Solvent-Cemented

Joints with PVC Pipe and Fittings (Replaced by

ASTM D2855)

TRll--FEB 1969 Resistance of Thermoplastic Piping Materials to

Micro- and Macro-Biological Attack

TR12--APR 1973 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Plastic (ABS)

piping Installation Procedures

TR13--AUG 1973 Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) Plastic Piping Design

and Installation

TR14--MAR 1971 Water Flow Characteristics of Thermoplastic Pipe

TR16 -AUG 1973 Thermoplastic Water Piping Systems

TR17 -AUG 1972 Thermoplastic Piping for Swimming Pool Water

Circulation Systems

TR18 -MAR 1973 Weatherability of Thermoplastic Piping

TR21 -SEPT 1973 Thermal Expansion and Contraction of Plastic Pipe

TR24 -MAR 1975 Deflection of Thermoplastic Pipe Resulting from

Thermal Cycling

137
TR25-JUN 1975 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Gravity Sewer Piping

Systems

TR26-APR 1975 Recommendations for Storage and Handling of

Polyvinyl Chloride Plastic (PVC) Pipe

TR27-APR 1975 Thermoplastic Drainage Systems for Residential

Applications

PPI Technical Notes (TN)

TNI -MAR 1970 Sealants for Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS)

Plastic Piping

TN2-MAR 1970 Sealants for Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Plastic

Piping

TN3-MAY 1971 Electrical Grounding

TN5-JAN 1972 Testing Equipment

TN6-MAR 1972 Recommendations for Coiling Polyethylene Plastic

Pipe and Tubing

TN7-SEPT 1973 The Nature of Hydrostatic Time-to-Rupture Plots

TN8-AUG 1973 Making Threaded Joints with Thermoplastics Pipe

and Fittings

TN9-AUG 1973 Coiling PVC Pipe and Tubing

TNIO-MAR 1975 Descriptions of Plastic Piping Joints

138
3. PPI Reconmendations and Statements (RS)

RS A Limiting Water Velocities in Thermoplastic Piping Systems,

January 5, 1971. Now in PPI-TRl 6-JUNE 1972 as Section 3.9

RS C Pressure Rating of PVC Plastic Piping for Water at

Elevated temperatures, August 1, 1973.

RS E Criteria for Joing Various Polythylene Materials to one another by Heat Fusion Techniques, April 3, 1974.

RS F Crush Strength and Flexibility of Thermoplastic Piping,

August 5, 1974.

RS H Noise in Piping, April 15, 1975

8.3.2 Company Publications

Individual manufacturers of raw materials and finished products have

published many documents that provide valuable technical data useful in the

selection of materials, the design and installation of thermoplastic piping

systems, the analysis or classification of test methods, the comparison

of chemical and physical properties of thermoplastics, inspection

techniques etc. These publications sometimes provide more detailed

and specialized information than the documentation issued by the

Plastics Pipe Institute. In many instances this could be useful

to the design/specifying engineer, the plumbing contractor, the

plumber, and the plumbing inspector.

A comprehensive listing of these documents would be voluminous,

and is outside the scope of this report. For the benefit of those

who may wish to obtain these kinds of technical data from individual

manufacturers, a partial listing of company names and addresses

is provided:

139
Borg-Warner Corporation

Marbond Dividion

P. 0. Box 68

Washington, W. Va 26181

Celanese Piping Systems

Celanese Plastics Corapnay

4550 Cemetery Road

Billiard, Ohio 43026

Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company

Plastics Division

P. 0. Box 991

Monroe, North Carolina 28110

Eastman Chemical Products, Inc.

P. 0. Box 431

Kingsport, Tennessee 37662

Genova Corporation

300 Rising Street

Davison, Michigan 48423

R.&.G. Sloane Mfg. Co., Inc.

7606 North Clybourn Avenue

Sun Valley, California 91352

Uniroyal, Inc.

Uniroyal Chemical Division

Naugatuck, Conn. 06770

For a more comprehensive listing of manufacturers, the reader is

referred to the current issue of the NSF Seal of Approval Listing of

Plastic Materials, Pipe, Fittings, and Appurtenances for Potable Water

and Waste Water, obtainable from:

140
National Sanitation Foundation

NSF Building

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

Alternatively, a list of member companies may be obtained from:

Plastics Pipe Institute

355 Lexington Avenue

New York, N.Y. 10017

8.3.3 Supplemental Bibliography of Individual Technical Papers by

Industry Experts

Nielsen, L. S.: Recommendations for use of Plastic Piping for

Drainage and Vent Systems in Buildings, New York State Building

Code Technical Report No. 3, August 1966.

Reinhart , F. W.: Engineering properties of plastics applicable

to water piping. Journal of the Missouri Water and Sewerage

Conference. Annual proceedings, V. 37, No. 1-4, Jan. -Oct. 1966.

pp. 19-29.

Reinhart, F. W. : Hydrostatic strength and design stresses

for thermoplastic pipe with wter. ASTM Special Technical

Publication No. 375: Similuated Service Testing in the Plastics

Industry. 1965. pp. 30-48.

Reinhart, F. W. : Long-term hydrostatic strength characteristics

of thermoplastics pipe. Polymer Engineering & Science, V. 6,

No. 4, Oct. 1966, pp. 285-295.

Reinhart, F. W. : Long-term working stresses of thermoplastic

pipe. SPE Journal, V. 17, No. 8, Aug. 1961. pp. 751-754.

141
Reinhart, F. W. : Pipe. Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and

Technology, V. 10, 1969. Interscience, N.Y. pp. 219-228.

Reinhart, F. W. : Recent developments in thermoplastic piping.

American Water Works Assoc. Journal, V. 60, No. 12, Dec. 1968.

pp. 1404-1410.

Richard, K. And Ewald, R. : Extrapolationsverfahren, Sicherheitsbeiwerte und zulaessige Rohrwandbeanspruchung von Polyaethylene

und PVC-Rohren. Kunststoffe, V. 49, No. 3, March 1959. pp. 116-120.

Extrapolation, safety factors and maximum working pressures relating

to polyethylene and PVC pipes, German Plastics, March 1959.

pp. 7-9. German & English.

Richard, K. and Ewald, R. : Extrapolation methods — P.V.C. and

polythene tubes. Plastics (London), V. 24, No. 259, April 1959.

pp. 153-156.

Richard, K. , Gaube, E. and Diedrich, G. : Die Pruefung der

Schlagzaehigkeit von PVC Rohren. (Determination of impact

strength of PVC pipe). Kunststoffe, V. 51, No. 8, Aug. 1961.

pp. 431-438. German.

Richard, K. And Diedrich, G. : Standfestigkeitseigenschaften

von einigen Hochpoljnneren. (Creep rupture strength of some high

polymers). Kunststoffe, V. 45, No. 10, Oct. 1955. pp. 429-443.

German

Richard, K., Diedrich, G. and Gaube, E.: Zeitstandfestigkeit

von Kunststoff rohren ; PVC und Ziegler-polyaethylen als Rohrwerkstoff e

(Creep rupture strength of plastic pipes; PVC and polyehtylene

as pipe materials). Kunststoffe, V.49, No. 11, Nov. 1959. pp. 616-621.

German.

142
Sansone, L. F. , Jr.: A comparison of short-time versus long-time properties of plastic pipe under hydrostatic pressure.

SPE Journal, V. 15, No. 5, May 1959. pp. 418-426.

Tiedeman, W. D, : Plastic service pipe — testing program.

American Water Works Assoc. Journal, V. 45, No. 7, 1953.

pp. 752-763.

Tiedeman, W. D. : Studies on plastic pipe for potable water

supplies. American Water Works Assoc. Journal, V. 46, No. 8,

1954. pp. 775-787.

Van der Voort, H. F. : Characteristics of polyvinyl chloride

conduit, insulated wire and piping in fire situations. Fire

Journal, v, 66, no. 6, 1972. pp. 91-94.

Vancrombrugge , R. : Kruip- en vermoeiingsterke van gelaste pe

buizen. (Creep and fatigue resistance of welded polyethylene

pipes). Plastica, V. 26, No. 5, May 1973. pp. 199-207. Dutch.

Vetter, H. : Zur Preufung von Kunststoff rohren. (Notes on the

testing of plastic pipe), Kunststoffe, V. 56, No. 4, April 1966.

pp. 250-253. German.

Voight, J.: Kunststof frohre unter statischer und pulsierender

Innendruck beanspruchung. (Plastic pipe under static and

intermittent internal pressure stress). Kunststoffe, V. 55,

No. 6, June 1965. pp. 460-464. German.

Wal, A. A. van der and Heyer, S,: Allowable stresses and quality

control of rigid PVC pipes. Rubber and Plastics Age, V. 41,

Feb. 1960. pp. 169-171, 173, 175, 177.

Wal, A. Ac van der: Allowable working stress in rigid PVC pipes.

Rubber and Plastics Age, V. 40, No. 2, Feb. 1959. pp. 156-158.

143
Watkins , R. K. , Szpak, E. and Allman, W. B. : Structural design

of polyethylene pipes subjected to external soil loads. Paper

presented at the ASTM D- 20 meeting, Boston, Mass. Oct. 15, 1973.

Wilging, R. C: Stress rupture testing of PVC pipe. Modern

Plastics, V. 51, No. 10, Oct. 1974. pp. 90-92.

8.4 UNITS OF MEASURE AND S.I. CONVERSION FACTORS

An NBS document, NBS Guidelines for The Use of Metric System, LC 1056,

originally issued November 1974 and most recently revised August 1977,

reaffirms, clarifies and strengthens the policy of NBS to lead in the use of the metric system. In keeping with the intent of LC 1056, the

the following guidelines have been adopted for this report:

1. Equations or formulas for which metric equivalents do not

yet appear in the engineering literature are expressed in

U.S. customary units.

2. When measurements have been reported in the literature in

U.S. customary units, the equivalent values in the International

System of Units (S.I.) are reported alongside enclosed in

parentheses

No. S.I. equivalent for descriptive data not affecting

calculations or results is required. For example when nominal

values of units appear as adjectives such as 3-inch pipe,

2 X 6-inch stud, 2-oz. bottle, etc., designations expressed

in customary units are acceptable.

Exceptions to the exclusive use of S.I. units are allowed

when communication or readership would be limited by the

exclusive use of S.I. units.

144
The following conversion factors, adapted from ASTM E380-74,

Metric Practice Guide, are appropriate for units of measure

that appear in this report:

Length

1 inch (in.) = 0.0254 meter (m)

1 foot (ft.) = 0.3048 meter (m)

Mass

1 pound-mass (Ibm) = 0.4535924 kilogram

Temperature

1 degree Fahrenheit (°F) = (1.8)-1 kelvin (K) or (°K)

Temperature Fahrenheit (°F) = (459.67 + temp. °F)/1.8 kelvins (K)

Time

1 hour (h) = 60 minutes (min . ) = 3600 seconds (s)

Velocity

1 foot per second (fps) = 0.3048 meter per second (m/s)

Force

1 pound-force (Ibf) = 4.448222 newtons ( N)

1 inch of water column at 60° F = 248.84 pascals (Pa)

Pressure

1 pound-force per square inch (psi) = 6894.757 pascals (Pa)

= 6.894757 kilopascals (kPa)

145
Volume

1 U.S. liquid gallon (gal.) = 0.003785412 meter^ (m^)

= 3.785412 leters (1)

Flow Rate

1 U.S. gallon per minute (gpm)

1 cubic foot per second (cfs) =

0.0000630902 meter's/second (m^/s)

3 3 63.0902 centimeters /second (cm /s

0.0630902 liter/second (1/s)

0.02831684 meters/second (m^/s)

28.31685 leters/second (1/s)

S.I. prefixes are used as defined by the following tabulation:

Factor Prefix Symbol

10^ mega M

10^ kilo k

10^ hecto h

10^ deka da

10"-^ deci d

— 9 10 centi c 10 ml 111 m

10"^ micro

146
NBS-114A (REV. 7-73)

U.S. DEPT. OF COMM. BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA

SHEET

1. PUBLICATION OR REPORT NO. BSS 111

2. Gov't Accession

No.

3. Recipient's Accession No.

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

Investigation of Standards, Performance Characteristics and

Evaluation Criteria for Thermoplastic Piping in Residential

Plumbing Systems

5. Publication Date May 1978

6. Performing Organization Code

7. AUTHOR(S) R.s. Wyly, W.J. Parker, E.T. Pierce, D.E. Rorrer

J.R. Shaver, G.C.. Sherlnn, M. Tryon.

8. Performing Organ. Report No.

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS' NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20234

10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. ^ u z, *-¥ 11. Contract/Grant No.

IAA-H-37-72 (409)

12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Complete Address (Street, City, State, ZIP)

Office of Policy Development and Research

Division of Energy,' Building Technology and Standards

Department of Housing and Urban Development

Washington, D.C. 20410

13. Type of Report 8c Period CoveredFinal

14. Sponsoring Agency Code

15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 78-600037

16. ABSTRACT (A 200-word or less tactual summary oi most si^ificant information. If document includes a significant

bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.) The application of the performance COncept tO the

evaluation of piping systems of innovative materials is explored. User needs are considered and several material-related physical parameters are studied that might be used as measures of satisfaction of the user needs.

Information was reviewed on usage, performance characteristics and standards for thermoplastic pipe and fittings, and special laboratory tests were made to study selected

characteristics and test methods. A number of performance statements and evaluation

methods are recommended or discussed that relate to characteristics associated with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) , acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) and chlorinated polyvinyl

chloride (CPVC) . This approach was taken to illustrate the application of performance

evaluation methodology to plumbing materials.

The results indicate that PVC, ABS, and CPVC can be used satisfactorily in a number of

residential plumbing applications if appropriate attention is given to the selection of

the materials, to the design of the piping system and to important installation details.

Further research and education are needed for the general application of performance

evaluation methodology as a basis for wider and more uniform acceptance of the abovementioned thermoplastics as well as other materials for plumbing piping. However, the

results of this study can be useful in expediting the systematic performance evaluation

of future innovative piping materials.

17. KEY WORDS (six to twelve entries; alphabetical order; capitalize only the first letter of the first key word unless a proper name; separated by semicolons) Acoustical performance (plumbing piping) ; fire performance

(plumbing piping) ; plumbing performance evaluation (piping) ; structural performance

(thermoplastic plumbing piping) ; thermoplastic pipe usage (residential plumbing)

.

18. AVAILABILITY I I Unlimited

I I For Official Distribution. Do Not Release to NTIS

I I Order From Sup. of Doc, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402, SD Catalog Stock No. 003-003-01934-8

I I Order From National Technical Information Service (NTIS)

Springfield, Virginia 22151

19. SECURITY CLASS

(THIS REPORT)

UNCL ASSIFIED

20. SECURITY CLASS

(THIS PAGE)

UNCLASSIFIED

21. NO. OF PAGES

152

22. Price

$3.25

USCOMM.DC 29042-P74

<IU.S. GO\F.RNMf:NT PR:NII\G OfFICE: 1 9 7 8 - 2 e ' " : J 8 / 1 1 0
There's

anew

look

to..

/ y ^

I / • • • monthly X / X magazine of the Nation-

^^^^^^^/^^ '^"'®3u of Standards.

y Still featured are special ar- ^^^^^k^Py^ tides of general interest on y / current topics such as consum- \^>^ ^/ er product safety and building ^^^"^

/ technology. In addition, new sections are designed to . . . PROVIDE

SCIENTISTS with illustrated discussions

of recent technical developments and

work in progress . . . INFORM INDUSTRIAL

MANAGERS of technology transfer activities in Federal and private labs. . . DESCRIBE TO MANUFACTURERS advances in the field of voluntary and

mandatory standards. The new DIMENSIONS/NBS also

carries complete listings of upcoming conferences to be

held at NBS and reports on all the latest NBS publications,

with information on how to order. Finally, each issue carries a page of News Briefs, aimed at keeping scientist and consumalike up to date on major developments at the Nation's physical sciences and measurement laboratory.

(please detach here) SUBSCRIPTION ORDER FORM

Enter my Subscription To DIMENSIONS/NBS at $12.50. Add $3.15 for foreign mailing. No additional postage is required for mailing witfiin the United States or its possessions. Domestic remittances should be made either by postal money order, express money order, or check. Foreign remittances should be made either by international money order, draft on an American bank, or by UNESCO

coupons.

Send Subscription to:

C] Remittance Enclosed (Make checks payable

to Superintendent of Documents)

n Charge to my Deposit Account No.

NAME-FIRST, LAST

COMPANY NAME OR ADDITIONAL ADDRESS LINE

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

STREET ADDRESS

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

CITY

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

STATE

1

ZIP CODE

1 1 1 1

MAIL ORDER FORM TO:

Superintendent of Documents Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402

PLEASE PRINT
Announcement of New Publications

of the

National Bureau of Standard*

Superintendent of Documents,

Government Printing Office,

Washington, D. C. 20402

Dear Sir:

Please add my name to the announcement list of new

publications as Issued by the National Bureau of Standards.

Name

Company

Address

City State Zip Code

(Notification Key N519)
^


I

NBS TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS

PERIODICALS

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH—The Journal of Research

of the National Bureau of Standards reports NBS research and development in those disciplines of the physical and

engineering sciences in which the Bureau is active. These

include physics, chemistry, engineering, mathematics, and computer sciences. Papers cover a broad range of subjects, with major emphasis on measurement methodology, and

the basic technology underlying standardization. Also in- cluded from time to time are survey articles on topics closely

related to the Bureau's technical and scientific programs. As

a special service to subscribers each issue contains complete

citations to all recent NBS publications in NBS and non- NBS media. Issued six times a year. Annual subscription: domestic ^17.00; foreign $21.25. Single copy, $3.00 domestic;

$3.75 foreign. Note: The Journal was formerly published in two sections: Section A "Physics and Chemistry" and Section B "Mathematical Sciences." DIMENSIONS/NBS

This monthly magazine is published to inform scientists, engineers, businessmen, industry, teachers, students, and consumers of the latest advances in science and technology,

with primary emphasis on the work at NBS. The magazine

highlights and reviews such issues as energy research, fire protection, building technology, metric conversion, pollution

abatement, health and safety, and consumer product per- formance. In addition, it reports the results of Bureau pro- grams in measurement standards and techniques, properties of matter and materials, engineering standards and services, instrumentation, and automatic data processing.

Annual subscription: Domestic, $12.50; Foreign $15.65.

NONPERIODICALS

Monographs—Major contributions to the technical liter- ature on various subjects related to the Bureau's scientific and technical activities. Handbooks—Recommended codes of engineering and industrial practice (including safety codes) developed in cooperation with interested industries, professional organizations,

and regulatory bodies. Special Publications—Include proceedings of conferences sponsored by NBS, NBS annual reports, and other special

publications appropriate to this grouping such as wall charts, pocket cards, and bibliographies.

Applied Mathematics Series—Mathematical tables, manuals, and studies of special interest to physicists, engineers,

chemists, biologists, mathematicians, computer programmers, and others engaged in scientific and technical work.

National Standard Reference Data Series—Provides quantitative data on the physical and chemical properties of

materials, compiled from the world's literature and critically evaluated. Developed under a world-wide program co- ordinated by NBS. Program under authority of National Standard Data Act (Public Law 90-396).

NOTE: At present the principal publication outlet for these data is the Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data (JPCRD) published quarterly for NBS by the American Chemical Society (ACS) and the American Institute of

Physics (AIP). Subscriptions, reprints, and supplements

available from ACS, 1155 Sixteenth St. N.W., Wash., D.C.

20056.

Building Science Series—Disseminates technical information developed at the Bureau on building materials, components,

systems, and whole structures. The series presents research

results, test methods, and performance criteria related to the

structural and environmental functions and the durability and safety characteristics of building elements and systems. Technical Notes—Studies or reports which are complete in themselves but restrictive in their treatment of a subject.

Analogous to monographs but not so comprehensive in scope or definitive in treatment of the subject area. Often

serve as a vehicle for final reports of work performed at NBS under the sponsorship of other government agencies.

Voluntary Product Standards—Developed under procedures

published by the Department of Commerce in Part 10, Title 15, of the Code of Federal Regulations. The purpose

of the standards is to establish nationally recognized require- ments for products, and to provide all concerned interests with a basis for common understanding of the characteristics of the products. NBS administers this program as a supple- ment to the activities of the private sector standardizing

organizations.

Consumer Information Series—Practical information, based on NBS research and experience, covering areas of interest to the consumer. Easily understandable language and

illustrations provide useful background knowledge for shopping in today's technological marketplace.

Order above NBS publications from: Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

20402. Order following NBS publications—NBSIR's and FIPS from

the National Technical Information Services, Springfield, Va. 22161.

Federal Information Processing Standards Publications (FIPS PUB)—Publications in this series collectively constitute the Federal Information Processing Standards Register.

Register serves as the oflScial source of information in the Federal Government regarding standards issued by NBS

pursuant to the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 as amended. Public Law 89-306 (79 Stat. 1127), and as implemented by Executive Order 11717

(38 FR 12315, dated May 11, 1973) and Part 6 of Tide 15 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations).

NBS Interagency Reports (NBSIR)—A special series of

interim or final reports on work performed by NBS for outside sponsors (boch government and non-government).

In general, initial distribution is handled by the sponsor;

public distribution is by the National Technical Information

Services (Springfield, Va. 22161) in paper copy or microfiche form.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

The following current-awareness and literature-survey bibli- ographies are issued periodically by the Bureau: Cryogenic Data Center Current Awareness Service. A litera- ture survey issued biweekly. Annual subscription: Domestic, $25.00; Foreign, $30.00.

Liquified Natural Gas. A literature survey issued quarterly.

Annual subscription: $20.00.

Superconducting Devices and Materials. A literature survey

issued quarterly. Annual subscription: $30.00. Send subscription orders and remittances for the preceding bibliographic

services to National Bureau of Standards, Cryogenic Data

Center (275.02) Boulder, Colorado 80302.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Bureau of Standards

Washington, D.C. 20234

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

Penalty for Private Use. $300

POSTAGE AND FEES PAID

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE COM-215

^

U.S.MAIL

SPECIAL FOURTH-CLASS RATE

BOOK