alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24.6

POWER OF ATTORNEY

As a director of New Page Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and of
NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the Company), I hereby constitute and appoint David J. Prystash, Douglas K. Cooper, and Mark A. Suwyn, and each of them, with full power to act without the
others, as my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 (Form 10-K), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other documents in connection with the Form
10-K, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of
Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 26th day of February, 2009.



/s/ Michael S. WilliamsSignaturePrint Name:

Michael S. Williams
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Bioethics, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jed Beck, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      August 11, 2010
            /s/ Jed BeckJed
      BeckPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended July 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Fuller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by In
Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





October 31, 2005                         /s/ John Fuller
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John Fuller
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 3270.12 What other orders or instructions may BLM issue? BLM may issue: ( a ) Geothermal resource operational orders, for detailed requirements that apply nationwide;
( b ) Notices to lessees, for detailed requirements on a statewide or regional basis;
( c ) Other orders and instructions specific to a field or area;
( d ) Permit conditions of approval; and
( e ) Oral orders, which BLM will confirm in writing.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Josiah J. White, Relator, v. Hon. Norman S. Dike, a Judge of the County Court of the County of Kings, Respondent.

Motion denied. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 48—MAINTENANCE OF MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE**

Sec.
5000A.
Requirement to maintain minimum essential coverage.
### **Subchapter B—Interest on Overpayments**

Sec.
6611.
Interest on overpayments.
6612.
Cross references.
From: Nizich, Sharon 

Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 9:42 AM 

To: 'Frey, Nathan J.'; Barnett, Keith 

Cc: Jordan, Scott; VanLare, Paula; Szabo, Aaron 

Subject: RE: Brick Package 

Hello NathanHere is the call-in number for our discussion Monday at 9:30 am: 

919 541 1591 

Thanks! 

Sharon Nizich 

Environmental Engineer 

U.S. EPA/OAR/OAQPS 

Sector Policies and Programs Division (SPPD) 

109 TW Alexander Dr. (D243-04) 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

(919) 541-2825 – Office 

(919) 541-5450 – Fax 

From: Frey, Nathan J. < Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov > 

Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 6:30 PM 

To: Barnett, Keith 

Cc: Nizich, Sharon; Jordan, Scott; VanLare, Paula; Szabo, Aaron 

Subject: RE: Brick Package 

Thanks Keith, 

Let’s plan on 9:30 am Monday. Can you please send call-in info and briefing slides when 

available? 

Many thanks, 

Nathan 
From: Barnett, Keith < Barnett.Keith@epa.gov > 

Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 5:07 PM 

To: Frey, Nathan J. 

Cc: Nizich, Sharon; Jordan, Scott; VanLare, Paula; Szabo, Aaron 

Subject: RE: Brick Package 

Dear Nathan: 

Folks availability on Monday for a brick briefing are start times of 11:00 AM until 1:30 PM. If that 

time window doesn’t work start times of 9:30 until 10:00 AM are available. I am assuming about 1 

hour – but it may take less. 

Sharon Nizich (nizich.sharon@epa.gov) is now the brick project lead. Jeff Telander retired. 

Keith Barnett 

Minerals and Manufacturing Group Leader 

919-541-5605 

From: Frey, Nathan J. < Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov > 

Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 3:23 PM 

To: Barnett, Keith 

Cc: Telander, Jeff; Szabo, Aaron 

Subject: Brick Package 

Hi Keith and Jeff, 

Is there a time that we could chat briefly this week? 

Many thanks, 

Nathan 

(202) 395 7345
#### § 3141.65 Rejection of bid.

If the high bid is rejected for failure by the successful bidder to execute the lease forms and pay the balance of the bonus bid, or otherwise to comply with the regulations of this subpart, the minimum bonus payment accompanying the bid will be forfeited.
### **CHAPTER 2—TAX ON SELF-EMPLOYMENT INCOME**

Sec.
1401.
Rate of tax.
1402.
Definitions.
1403.
Miscellaneous provisions.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4798 

To rescind certain funding provided to the Internal Revenue Service under 

section 10301 of Public Law 117–169. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2022 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To rescind certain funding provided to the Internal Revenue 

Service under section 10301 of Public Law 117–169. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESCISSION OF CERTAIN FUNDS FOR EN4 HANCED INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE RE5 SOURCES. 

6 Effective on the date of enactment of this Act, the 

7 unobligated balances of the amounts made available under 

8 the following provisions of Public Law 117–169 are re9 scinded: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4798 IS

1 (1) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ENFORCE2 MENT FUNDS.—Section 10301(1)(A)(ii). 

3 (2) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OPERATIONS

4 SUPPORT.—Section 10301(1)(A)(iii). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### United Glass Company *v.*Chamlee, administrator.

Fish, C. J.

1. There was no error in overruling the demurrers to the sheriff’s -answer to the rule.

2. Tf personal' property was levied on under-an execution, and' a -claim thereto duly interposed and a forthcoming- bond given, with proper security, it was the duty of the sheriff to leave the property in the possession of the claimant. Tf found subject, and not forthcoming on the day of sale, there was a remedy on the bond. The sheriff was not for that- reason liable to rule for not having made the money. Civil Code, § 4616.

3. Without special authority, attorneys can not receive anything in dis*153charge of a client’s claim but the full amount in cash. Civil Code, § 4418. But if the attorney for a plaintiff in fi. fa., in the effort to collect the money due thereon, and while repyesenting his client, made an agreement as to leaving the property levied on at a certain place, and so directed the sheriff as to cause an illegal sale to be made by the latter without having the goods in possession, and the attorney bid them in for his client, and afterwards they were burned in a fire occurring at the place where they were left by consent, on a rule against the sheriff for not having realized the amount of the execution he would not be liable for damages resulting from the above-stated causes.

August 10, 1910.

Rehearing denied September 24, 1910.

Rule. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court. April 24, 1909.

*Dean & Dean*and *Henry Walker,*for plaintiff.

*McHenry £ Porter, George A. H. Harris £ Son,*and *B. L. Qhamlee,*for defendant.

4. No formal traverse' appears to have been made to the sheriff’s answer. The pleadings and evidence were somewhat confused. The charges may not have been altogether free from inaccuracy. But, upon a review of the whole case, there was no erroi in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-53;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
### PART I—ESTATES, TRUSTS, AND BENEFICIARIES

Subpart
A.
General rules for taxation of estates and trusts.
B.
Trusts which distribute current income only.
C.
Estates and trusts which may accumulate income or which distribute corpus.
D.
Treatment of excess distributions by trusts.
E.
Grantors and others treated as substantial owners.
F.
Miscellaneous.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30367 Conference Calendar

MARCELO ESPINOSA, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus WARDEN, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY POLLOCK, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:03-CV-2208

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Marcelo Espinosa, federal prisoner # 16482-018, appeals the district court’s order denying and dismissing with prejudice his application for writ of habeas corpus. Espinosa argues that the district court erred in finding that he did not satisfy the requirements for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 application under 28 U.S.C. § 2255’s “savings clause.” Espinosa argues that because he was charged with a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2(b), he was convicted of a non-existent offense; that the jury must United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-30367 -2- determine the drug quantity used for sentencing; that he was subject to a maximum sentence of only 20 years of imprisonment; and that he is actually innocent of the career offender enhancement of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. He asserts that he should be allowed to raise his claims via a § 2241 application and requests that this court reconsider its holding in Reyes-Requena v. United
States , 243 F.3d 893 (5th Cir. 2001). Espinosa has not met his burden of showing that he meets the requirements for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 application under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He has not pointed to a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes that he may have been imprisoned for conduct that was not prohibited by law. Nor has he shown that his claim was foreclosed by circuit law at the time of his guilty-plea conviction, appeal, or first § 2255 motion. See Reyes-Requena , 243 F.3d at 903-04.
AFFIRMED.
§ 30.211 How will OHA provide public notice of the formal probate proceeding? ( a ) In addition to the mailed notice in § 30.210, OHA will also arrange for the posting of notice of probate hearings for formal probate proceedings at least 21 days before the date of the hearing.
( b ) The notice may contain information for more than one hearing and will specify the names of the decedents, the probate case numbers of the cases, the dates of the decedents' deaths, the dates of the most recent wills filed with the probate cases, and the dates, times, and places of the hearings.
( c ) OHA will post the notice on its website at the following link:*https://www.doi.gov/oha/organization/PHD*
( d ) The judge may also cause notice to be published in a local newspaper or other publication if the judge determines that additional notice is appropriate.
( e ) Unless one of the circumstances listed in paragraph (f) of this section is present, OHA will also arrange for the physical posting of the notice in each of the following locations: ( 1 ) The home agency;
( 2 ) The agency with jurisdiction over each parcel of trust or restricted property in the estate, if different from the home agency;
( 3 ) A conspicuous place in the vicinity of the designated place of hearing, if the hearing is designated for a location other than the agency listed in paragraph (e)(1) or (2) of this section; and
( 4 ) Additional locations if the judge determines that further posting is appropriate.
( f ) OHA may proceed with the hearing without physical posting of the notice at an agency office if the notice is posted in a conspicuous place near that agency office and physical posting at the agency office was not possible due to the agency office being closed or inaccessible.
[86 FR 72086, Dec. 20, 2021, as amended at 88 FR 39769, June 20, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59299-59300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22277]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee--Open Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee 
open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a 
meeting of the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee 
(COMSTAC). The meeting will take place on Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 
starting at 8 a.m. at the Federal Aviation Administration Headquarters 
Building, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, in the Bessie 
Coleman Conference Center, 2nd Floor. This will be the fortieth meeting 
of the COMSTAC.
    The proposed agenda for the meeting will include updates on current

[[Page 59300]]

commercial space transportation legislation, and an activities report 
from FAA's Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation. 
An agenda will be posted on the FAA Web site at http://ast.faa.gov. 
Meetings of the COMSTAC Working Groups (Technology and Innovation, 
Reusable Launch Vehicle, Risk Management, and Launch Operations and 
Support) will be held on Tuesday, October 26, 2004. For specific 
information concerning the times and locations of the working group 
meetings, contact the Contact Person listed below.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
inform the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Parker (AST-200), Office of the 
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST), 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Room 331, Washington, DC 20591, telephone 
(202) 385-4713; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92f0e0f7fcf6f3bce2f3e0f9f7e0d2f4f3f3bcf6fde6bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="127060777c76733c627360797760527473733c767d663c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued in Washington, DC, September 28, 2004.
Patricia G. Smith,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 04-22277 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 684.220 What is the process for applying for a Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act grant? ( a ) Entities seeking a WIOA sec. 166 grant, including incumbent grantees, will be provided an opportunity to apply for a WIOA sec. 166 grant every 4 years through a competitive grant process.
( b ) As part of the competitive application process, applicants will be required to submit a 4-year plan as described at § 684.710. The requirement to submit a 4-year plan does not apply to entities that have been granted approval to transfer their WIOA funds to the Department of the Interior pursuant to Public Law 102-477.
#### § 3590.0-3 Authority.

Authority for carrying out the regulations in this part is set out in § 3500.0-3 of this title, unless otherwise noted.
(No. 7006

#### Gulf Oil Company—U.S., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 2, 1973.*

Gulf Oil Company—U.S., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 5, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00216

- CV

IN RE STEPHENS INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

On April 4, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus

, an unopposed emergency

motion to stay, and an unopposed motion to submit mandamus documents under seal

. This court

believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further

consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may

fi le a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this court no later than April 2 3, 2018

. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

Relator’s unopposed request to submit the 140 documents that are the subject of this

mandamus proceeding under seal for possible in camera review by this court is GRANTED.

Relator ’ s unopposed request for a stay is GRANTED. The trial court’s March 14, 2018

Order on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery from Steph ens Inc. is STAYED pending final

resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus.

It is so ORDERED on April 5, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________ Clerk of Court

1 This procee ding arises out of Cause No. 2017

- CI

- 05787 , styled James E. Bennet, Jr., et al. v. Roy J. Moore, et al.

, pending in the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the The Honorable Angelica Jimenez presiding.
October 14, 2014

BY EMAIL/MAIL

Ms. Lauralyn J. Remo

Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division

Office of Aviation Analysis

c/0 Docket Operations 

M-30, Room W12-140

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Dynamic Aviation Docket DOT-OST-2014-0069

Dear Ms. Remo, 

Attached is additional key personnel information as required by 14 CFR §204.3 concerning 

Dynamic Airways’ Director of Maintenance Mr. Mike Steinke. 

Respectfully,

Joanne W. Young

David M. Kirstein

Kirstein & Young, PLLC

1750 K St. NW, Suite 200

Washington, DC 2006

(202) 331-3348

jyoung@yklaw.com

dkirstein@yklaw.com

Counsel for Dynamic Airways, LLC

CC: Damon Walker

DOT-OST-2014-0069

October 14, 2014
Press Release


[Graphic omitted] Ahold

                                                                     Royal Ahold
                                                        Corporate Communications



                                                         Date:  October 17, 2003
                                        For more information:   +31 75 659 57 20







Ahold completes sale of Golden Gallon Convenience Stores in Southeast U.S.

Zaandam, The Netherlands, October 17, 2003 - Ahold today announced it has
successfully completed the sale of Golden Gallon, its fuel and merchandise
convenience store operation in the southeastern United States, to The Pantry,
Inc. The transaction value amounts to approximately USD 187 million.

The Pantry is the leading convenience store operator in the southeastern United
States and the third largest independently operated convenience store chain in
the country. The divestment of Golden Gallon, originally announced on August 25,
2003, is part of Ahold's strategic plan to restructure its portfolio to focus on
core food businesses.

Golden Gallon operated 138 convenience stores and has been part of Ahold's
portfolio since 2000. The company employed approximately 1,100 employees.


Ahold Corporate Communications: +31.75.659.57.20






                                                 Albert Heijnweg 1, Zaandam
                                                 P.O. Box 3050, 1500 HB Zaandam
                                                 The Netherlands
                                                 Phone:  +31 (0)75 659 5720
                                                 Fax:    +31 (0)75 659 8302
http://www.ahold.com