alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5353. Availability of funds to agencies, institutions, and organizations

No funds from any contract or grant pursuant to this subchapter shall be made available by any Federal agency directly to other than public agencies and Indian tribes, institutions, and organizations: Provided, That school districts, State education agencies, and Indian tribes, institutions, and organizations assisted by this subchapter may use funds provided herein to contract for necessary services with any appropriate individual, organization, or corporation.

(Pub. L. 93–638, title II, §206, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 458b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectraLink Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John H. Elms, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein. /s/ JOHN H. ELMS President and Chief Executive Officer
May 6, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SpectraLink Corporation and will be retained by SpectraLink Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies this
report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing. 37
§ 3175.70 Measurement location. ( a ) *Commingling and allocation.* Gas produced from a lease, unit PA, or CA may not be commingled with production from other leases, unit PAs, CAs, or non-Federal properties before the point of royalty measurement, unless prior approval is obtained under 43 CFR subpart 3173.
( b ) *Off-lease measurement.* Gas must be measured on the lease, unit, or CA unless approval for off-lease measurement is obtained under 43 CFR subpart 3173.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 653

 612

 606

 596

 607

 618

 634

 633

 617

 635

 642

 680

 676

 624

 545

 500

 503

 529

 531

 567

 585

 643

 678

 718

 582

 582

 460

 418

 318

 300

 306

 609

 575

 576

 577

 595

 553

 621

 608

 599

 617

 621

 646

 620

 529

 325

 384

 488

 488

 483

 535

 566

 583

 626

 597

 530

 462

 409

 281

 282

 272

 281

 635

 598

 592

 589

 602

 610

 627

 618

 609

 626

 627

 667

 650

 567

 398

 449

 495

 515

 506

 554

 577

 609

 663

 684

 557

 505

 435

 328

 304

 281

 295

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 15,148

 15,746

 16,094

 16,425

 16,711

 16,943

 17,131

 17,244

 17,290

 17,374

 17,544

 17,762

 17,960

 18,057

 17,954

 17,893

 17,864

 17,839

 17,791

 17,779

 17,780

 17,798

 17,848

 17,901

 17,832

 17,711

 17,519

 17,201

 16,853

 16,477

 16,137

 505

 525

 536

 548

 557

 565

 571

 575

 576

 579

 585

 592

 599

 602

 598

 596

 595

 595

 593

 593

 593

 593

 595

 597

 594

 590

 584

 573

 562

 549

 538

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §882a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–404, §2, Sept. 19, 1970, 84 Stat. 845, which exempted per capita payments to members of the Sac and Fox Tribes from Federal and State income taxes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raimundo VARGAS-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-40360.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Raimundo Vargas-Garda (Vargas) appeals from his conviction of illegal reentry *267following deportation, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Vargas contends for the first time on appeal that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release and that this condition should therefore be vacated. This claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2005) (No. 05-8662).

Vargas next argues, for the first time on appeal, that his previous state offensé of burglary of a habitation did not constitute a “crime of violence” for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). He correctly concedes that his argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Garcia-Mendez,*420 F.3d 454, 456-57 (5th Cir.2005), *cert, denied*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1398, 164 L.Ed.2d 100 (2006), but he raises the argument to preserve it for further review. He also argues that *Garcia-Mendez*was incorrectly decided. We do not disturb our holding in *Garcia-Mendez. See United States v. Taylor,*933 F.2d 307, 313 (5th Cir.1991) (one panel of this court may not overrule another panel).

Vargas finally challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Vargas contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert, denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Vargas properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *267the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §393a. Lands of Five Civilized Tribes

From and after thirty days from February 11, 1936 the restricted lands belonging to Indians of the Five Civilized Tribes in Oklahoma of one-half or more Indian blood, enrolled or unenrolled, may be leased for periods of not to exceed five years for farming and grazing purposes, under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe and not otherwise. Such leases shall be made by the owner or owners of such lands, if adults, subject to approval by the superintendent or other official in charge of the Five Civilized Tribes Agency, and by such superintendent or other official in charge of said agency in cases of minors and of Indians who are non compos mentis.

(Feb. 11, 1936, ch. 50, 49 Stat. 1135.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Exhibit 32.1


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bioethics, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark J. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



/s/ Mark J. Cowan
Mark J. Cowan
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2007
#### § 30.192 Does a renounced interest vest in the person who renounced it?

No. An interest in trust or restricted property renounced under this subpart is not considered to have vested in the renouncing heir or devisee, and the renunciation is not considered a transfer by gift of the property renounced.
### **Subchapter A—Policies Issued By Foreign Insurers**

Sec.
4371.
Imposition of tax.
4372.
Definitions.
4373.
Exemptions.
4374.
Liability for tax.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–148, title VI, §6301(e)(2)(B)(i), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 746, added subchapter heading.
Exhibit 23.1

The Board of Directors

Max Re Capital Ltd.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 333-69092 on Form S-8 and No. 333-131951 on Form S-8 of Max Re Capital Ltd. of our reports dated February 15, 2006, except as to the restatement discussed in
note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, which is as of November 13, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and all related schedules, and our report dated February 15, 2006, except as to the second through
final paragraphs of Managements Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting (as restated), which are as of November 13, 2006, on managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Max Re Capital Ltd.

Our report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting expresses our opinion that Max Re Capital Ltd. did not maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005 because of the effect of a material weakness on the achievement of objectives of the control criteria and contains explanatory paragraphs that state that management has identified and included in its revised
assessment the following control deficiencies which resulted in a material weakness as of December 31, 2005.



| |  |  | The Company did not maintain effective controls to bifurcate retroactive and prospective elements of coverage within reinsurance contracts purchased in accordance with SFAS 113,
where the dates of agreement in principle of substantial terms and coverage inception differed.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Company did not maintain effective controls over the appropriate accounting for the specific contractual feature contained within the three complex retrocessional contracts
purchased.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Company did not maintain effective controls to identify potential extra-contractual agreements, including oral agreements, related to their retrocessional contracts purchased to
allow for an appropriate determination of risk transfer.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 
|-----------------
|/s/ KPMG         
|Hamilton, Bermuda
|November 13, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF GEOCOM RESOURCES INC.





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Geocom Resources Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2009, the undersigned, Paul Chung, President and Chief Executive Officer of Geocom Resources Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Geocom Resources Inc.





Date: February 28, 2013
By:
/s/ Paul ChungPaul ChungChief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Financial Officer)
### §714b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 98–481, §4, Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2251, which related to membership rolls, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
NO. 07-06-0349-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

SEPTEMBER 28, 2006

______________________________

ALEX MARTINEZ FLORES, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2005-409,540; HONORABLE BRADLEY UNDERWOOD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant Alex Martinez Flores appeals his conviction for the offense of possession

of a controlled substance in an amount more than four grams but less than 200 grams and

his punishment of 30 years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice.

Appellant has failed to file an adequate docketing statement as required under Rule

32.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Instead, appellant has notified this court

of his intention to seek a court appointed attorney. However, the trial court clerk’s office
2

has no record of appellant’s request for a court appointed attorney as of September 15,

2006.

We now abate this cause and remand it to the 364th District Court of Lubbock

County. It is ordered that the judge of said court convene a hearing, after due notice to all

parties, to determine: 

1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; 

2) whether appellant has retained counsel; or 

3) if appellant is not represented by retained counsel, whether appellant

is indigent and, therefore, is entitled to appointed counsel and a

record of the trial court proceedings free of charge.

We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law

addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to

pursue his appeal, is not represented by counsel and is indigent, we then further direct the

court to 1) appoint counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal, and 2) issue an order

requiring the preparation of a clerk's record in accordance with Rule 34.5 of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure. The name, address, phone number, fax number, and state

bar number of any counsel who is appointed to represent appellant on appeal must also

be included in the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial

court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk's record containing the

findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders of the trial court issued as a result of
3

its hearing on this matter and 2) a reporter's record transcribing the evidence and

arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall

cause the supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before

November 3, 2006. Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial

court may request same on or before November 3, 2006.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
# BAT丁ERY LOG ! ¥、○○_/ ¥、_/ �DATE �# �START% �END% �FしiGH丁# ��CHARGING ����� �BAT「ERYCYCLES **春 ��X �X �X �0-2与% �#1 �#2 �#3 *掌* ��*** �X �X �2与-与0% � � � 牽*掌 ��*** �事** �X �与0-7与% � � � **春 ��*暮* �*** �*** �7与-100% � � � 

## DISCHARGiNG ����� � � � タ  音,弱音 ���� �87.与-100% � � � 春春* �7与-87.与% � � � X �62.与-7与% � � � 春*暮 X �X �与0-62.与% � � �

X �37.与-与0% �� � *** �X �X �2与-37.与% � � � X ���X �X �1之.与-2与% � � � *** ��X �X �X �0-12.与% � � ̅ � 

## X ��X �X �X �0% � � �
BA○○丁ERYLIFE ����� � � �



### 90-100% �� � 春奪* �80-90% 70-80% � � � X ������ �� 

## ) �� ���*** �X �60-70% � � �

X �X �与0-60% � � � 蕩 袈 �∴∴; !∴∴∴ 零** ���X �X �40-与0% � � � 

### 3 ��X ���X �X �30-40% � � � 牽暮* �X ��X �X �20-30% � � � 

### X �X ��X �X �20%OR」ESS �� �

#1-S/N 3221143814486 #2-S/N D」O70014062411608 #3-S/N DJO700114070105502
#### § 3809.433 Does this subpart apply to a new modification of my plan of operations?

To see how this subpart applies to a modification of your plan of operations that you submit to BLM after January 20, 2001, refer to the following table.

| If you have an approved plan of operations on January 20, 2001 | Then— |
| --- | --- |
| (a) *New facility.* You subsequently propose to modify your plan of operations by constructing a new facility, such as waste rock repository, leach pad, impoundment, drill site, or road | The plan contents requirements (§ 3809.401) and performance standards (§ 3809.420) of this subpart apply to the new facility. Those facilities and areas not included in the modification may continue to operate under the terms of your existing plan of operations. |
| (b) *Existing facility.* You subsequently propose to modify your plan of operations by modifying an existing facility, such as expansion of a waste rock repository, leach pad, or impoundment; layback of a mine pit; or widening of a road | The plan contents requirements (§ 3809.401) and performance standards (§ 3809.420) of this subpart apply to the modified portion of the facility, unless you demonstrate to BLM's satisfaction it is not practical to apply them for economic environmental, safety, or technical reasons. If you make the demonstration, the plan content requirements (43 CFR 3809.1-5) and performance standards (43 CFR 3809.1-3(d) and 3809.2-2) that were in effect immediately before January 20, 2001 apply to your modified facility. (See 43 CFR parts 1000-end, revised as of Oct. 1, 2000.) |
Exhibit 10.2

FIRST AMENDMENT  TO THE  MICHAELS STORES, INC.  EMPLOYEES 401(k) PLAN(As Amended and Restated Effective August 1, 1999)

Michaels Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation, pursuant to authority of the Board of Directors, hereby adopts the following amendments to the Michaels
Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k) Plan (the "Plan"), effective as of January 1, 2002, except as otherwise indicated.













---















2

---

















3

---

















4

---















5

---





| |  | MICHAELS STORES, INC.
| |  | ---------------------
| |  | By                   
| |  |                      
| |  |                      

6

---

QuickLinks
§ 30.245 What legal standard will be applied to reopen a case? ( a ) If a petition for reopening is filed within 3 years or less of the date of the decision or order, the judge may reopen the case to correct an error of fact or law in the decision or order.
( b ) When a petition for reopening is filed more than 3 years after the date of the decision or order, the judge may reopen the case if the judge finds that the need to correct the error outweighs the interests of the public and heirs or devisees in the finality of the probate proceeding.
[86 FR 72087, Dec. 20, 2021]
#### § 35.11 Referral of complaint and answer to the ALJ.

Upon receipt of an answer, the reviewing offical shall file the complaint and answer with the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Hearings Division, Department of the Interior, for assignment to an ALJ. The reviewing official shall include the name, address, and telephone number of a representative for the Government.
### PART II—TIRES

Sec.
4071.
Imposition of tax.
4072.
Definitions.
4073.
Exemptions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, §869(d)(2), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1623, substituted "Exemptions" for "Exemption for tires with internal wire fastening" in item 4073.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title VII, §735(c)(5)(A), (C), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 982, struck out "AND TUBES" from heading of part II and substituted "Exemption for tires with internal wire fastening" for "Exemptions" in item 4073.

**1956**—Act June 29, 1956, ch. 462, title II, §204(d), 70 Stat. 389, substituted "Definitions" for "Definition of rubber" in item 4072.
### **Subchapter E—Burden of Proof**

Sec.
7491.
Burden of proof.