alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 3, 2019

No. 04-19-00506-CV

Virginia J. BARGAS, Individually and as Guardian for Plaintiff David A. Bargas,

Appellant

v.

Fabrication of Rig & Exploration Equipment, Inc.,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-07-001644-CVK-A

Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellee’s Second Motion to Extend Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time 

is extended to December 5, 2019. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
### §5602. Reaffirmation of policy

Pursuant to the constitutionally vested authority of Congress over Indian affairs, Congress reaffirms that the responsibility of the United States to Indian tribes includes a duty to promote tribal self-determination regarding governmental authority and economic development.

(Pub. L. 114–178, title I, §102, June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 433.)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4453 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4453

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 100 South 1st Street in Minneapolis, Minnesota, as the ``Martin Olav 
                          Sabo Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2022

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Ms. Smith) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 100 South 1st Street in Minneapolis, Minnesota, as the ``Martin Olav 
                          Sabo Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARTIN OLAV SABO POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 100 South 1st Street in Minneapolis, Minnesota, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Martin Olav Sabo Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Martin 
Olav Sabo Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
1/4/13 page of



### POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0074 Reviewer: Tobias/SS

Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary

Exposure Scenario 1 Water Landfill Stack Air Fugitive Air Drinking Water Fish Ingestion
ADR LADD ADR LADD 7Q10 4
CC = 1 PDM Days Exceede d LADD ADR LADD ADR LADD

Release activity(ies) 2 ; exposure calculation(s) 3 mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day μg/l # Days mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day

max acute eco --- --- --- --- 2.17E+00 --- --- --- --- --- ---

1 Exposure scenario titles consist of release activity followed by exposure calculation abbreviation. 2 Release activities are from engineering report's Manuf acturing (Mfg), Processing (Proc) and Use release activity labels. Multiple release activities are combined in one exposure scenario if their releases occur at same location. 3 Exposure calculations are Acute Dose Rate (A DR), Lifetime Average Daily Dose (LADD), and Probabilistic Dilution Model (PDM). There may be one, two, or all three exposure calculations per exposure scenario. CC is the aquatic concentration of concern. 4 This column displays concentration values for the 7Q 10 streamflow, which is defined as the average daily streamflow of the seven consecutive days of lowest flow within a ten year period.



### Fate test recommendations?: (default is NA)1/4/13 page of

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0074 Assessor: Tobias/SS

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#:1 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Max ADR
Release Description: WATER LANDFILL Non-sludge/Sludge STACK FUGITIVE

Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release: (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day)

Remarks:1/4/13 page of

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0074

SIC-CODE BASED HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 1 Number of Sites: RELEASE ACTIVITY: Max ADR

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW's (All facilities) SIC-CODE (S): 4952 EX POSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT REMOVAL (%) RELEASE DAYS PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day) POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day) DWT (%) BCF (L/kg)

0.00 0.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE % ILE FACILITY STREAM FLOW (MLD) STREAM CONC. ( μ g/l)

Harmonic

Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 Harmonic Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10

ALL 50 125.56 44.02 26.80 22.53 1.83E-02 5.22E-02 8.58E-02 0.10

ALL 10 11.11 1.94 1.06 0.96 0.21 1.19 2.17 2.40

DRINKING WATER AND FISH IN GESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units Drinking Water Results Drinking Water Units Fish Ingestion Results Fish Ingestion

Units 50% 10% 50% 10%

Cancer

LADD pot 3.91E-10 4.42E-09 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day

LADC pot 2.01E-08 2.27E-07 mg/L 0.00 0.00 mg/kg

Acute

ADR pot 4.37E-06 9.91E-05 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:
#### Frank E. Nash, Doing Business under the Name of Frank E. Nash Fence Company, Respondent, v. Frank Mennan, as President of Local Union 580 *675of the Ornamental and Architectural Iron Workers, et al., Appellants.

Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Case: 14-11111 Date Filed: 03/19/2015 Page: 1 of 3 
Case: 14-11111 Date Filed: 03/19/2015 Page: 2 of 3 
Case: 14-11111 Date Filed: 03/19/2015 Page: 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7479

DANIEL JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM D. CATOE, Deputy Director of SCDC;

GERALDINE MIRO, Warden of ACI; MS. ULMER,

Paymaster of ACI; L. J. ALLEN, Regional Director; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-35263-17BC)

Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 3, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, BOGOSLOW &

JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

October 8, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on October 13, 1999. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, we take the

date the order was entered on the docket sheet as the effective

date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806

F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Jones v. Catoe, No. CA-98-35263-17BC (D.S.C. Oct. 13, 1999).* We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 Powerlinx, Inc.
              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302

I, Douglas Bauer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Powerlinx, Inc;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  or caused  such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          registrant including its consolidated subsidiary,  is made known to us
          by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most  recent  fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is
          reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

     (a)  All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          control  over  financial  reporting  which  are  reasonably  likely to
          adversely  affect  the  registrant's   ability  to  record,   process,
          summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2005

/s/ Douglas Bauer
-----------------
Douglas Bauer
Chief Financial Officer
### §305d. Criminal proceedings; civil actions

#### (a) Definition of Federal law enforcement officer

In this section, the term "Federal law enforcement officer" includes a Federal law enforcement officer (as defined in section 115(c) of title 18).

#### (b) Authority to conduct investigations

Any Federal law enforcement officer shall have the authority to conduct an investigation relating to an alleged violation of this Act occurring within the jurisdiction of the United States.

#### (c) Criminal proceedings

#### (1) Investigation

#### (A) In general

The Board may refer an alleged violation of section 1159 of title 18 to any Federal law enforcement officer for appropriate investigation.

#### (B) Referral not required

A Federal law enforcement officer may investigate an alleged violation of section 1159 of that title regardless of whether the Federal law enforcement officer receives a referral under subparagraph (A).

#### (2) Findings

The findings of an investigation of an alleged violation of section 1159 of title 18 by any Federal department or agency under paragraph (1)(A) shall be submitted, as appropriate, to—

(A) a Federal or State prosecuting authority; or

(B) the Board.

#### (3) Recommendations

On receiving the findings of an investigation under paragraph (2), the Board may—

(A) recommend to the Attorney General that criminal proceedings be initiated under section 1159 of title 18; and

(B) provide such support to the Attorney General relating to the criminal proceedings as the Attorney General determines to be appropriate.

#### (d) Civil actions

In lieu of, or in addition to, any criminal proceeding under subsection (c), the Board may recommend that the Attorney General initiate a civil action under section 305e of this title.

(Aug. 27, 1935, ch. 748, §5, as added Pub. L. 101–644, title I, §103, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4662; amended Pub. L. 111–211, title I, §102(a), July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2258.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act Aug. 27, 1935, ch. 748, 49 Stat. 891, which is classified generally to section 305 et seq. of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section, act Aug. 27, 1935, ch. 748, §5, 49 Stat. 892, related to counterfeiting of a trade mark and penalty, prior to repeal by act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, effective Sept. 1, 1948. See section 1158 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–211 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

"(a) The Board may receive complaints of violations of section 1159 of title 18 and refer complaints of such violations to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for appropriate investigation. After reviewing the investigation report, the Board may recommend to the Attorney General of the United States that criminal proceedings be instituted under that section.

"(b) The Board may recommend that the Secretary of the Interior refer the matter to the Attorney General for civil action under section 305e of this title."
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Request for Public Review and Comment of Changes to the Navstar 
GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Segment Interface Control Document 
(ICD)

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Notice and request for review/comment of changes to ICD-GPS-
200C.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice informs the public that the Global Positioning 
System (GPS) Joint Program Office (JPO) proposes to revise ICD-GPS-200, 
Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interfaces. This proposal 
changes the document identifier from ICD-GPS-200 to Interface 
Specification (IS)-GPS-200. In addition, this revision will increment 
the revision letter from C to D, resulting in IS-GPS-200 Revision D. 
One of the main subjects of this revision effort is an introduction of 
new Improved Clock & Ephemeris (ICE) navigation message that will be 
broadcast with L2 C signal. These proposed changes are described in a 
Draft IS-GPS-200D, dated 9 July 2004. This draft document is an updated 
version of the draft document previously released in February 2004. The 
draft document can be viewed and downloaded at the following Web site: 
http://gps.losangeles.af.mil. Click on ``System Engineering'', then 
``Public Interface Control Working Group (ICWG)''. Reviewers should 
save the document to a local memory location prior to opening and 
performing the review.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to SMC/GPERC, 2420 Vela Way, Suite 1467, El 
Segundo CA 90245-4659. A comment matrix is provided for your 
convenience at the web site and is the preferred method of comment 
submittal. Comments may be submitted to the following Internet address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e1d030d40091e0b1c0d2e02011d0f00090b020b1d400f0840030702"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96e5fbf5b8f1e6f3e4f5d6faf9e5f7f8f1f3faf3e5b8f7f0b8fbfffa">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments may also be sent by fax to 1-310-
363-6387.

DATES: The suspense date for comment submittal is 30 October 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: GPERC at 1-310-363-2883, GPS JPO 
System Engineering Division, or write to the address above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The civilian and military communities use 
the Global Positioning System, which employs a constellation of 24 
satellites to provide continuously transmitted signals to enable 
appropriately configured GPS user equipment to produce accurate 
position, navigation, and time information.

Pamela D. Fitzgerald,
Air Force Federal Register Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-21366 Filed 9-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Missile Defense, Phase 
IV (Information Policy) will meet in closed session on October 15, 2004 
and December 9-10, 2004, at the Institute for Defense Analyses, 1801 N. 
Beauregard Street, Alexandria, VA. The Task Force will assess: the 
scope of the modeling and simulation effort; the appropriateness of the 
level of fidelity of classes of simulations; the impact of 
communications in the end-to-end models; the approaches to ensuring the 
validity of simulations for all uses, including exercises and wargaming 
done for training and operations concept development; and additional 
opportunities for modeling and simulation contribution to Ballistic 
Missile Defense Systems development and evaluation.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this 
meeting, the Defense Science Board Task Force will address the above 
mentioned issues in a system of systems context with particular 
emphasis on battle management systems, command and control systems, and 
the global sensor system. The Task Force will provide advice on the 
state of modeling and simulation for use in assessing overall 
performance of segments of the Ballistic Missile Defense Systems; e.g., 
ground-based midcourse intercept system, space-based interceptor 
system.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that this Defense Science Board Task Force meeting concerns 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the 
meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: September 28, 2004.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-22171 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                   UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                             Date: November 24, 2004

                        Commission File Number 001-12510

                                  ROYAL AHOLD
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

               Albert Heijnweg 1, 1507 EH Zaandam, The Netherlands
               ---------------------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)





     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                      ---                       ---

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                           Yes                       No    X
                                 ---                      ---

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.
<PAGE>

     On November 24, 2004, Koninklijke Ahold N.V. ("Royal Ahold") issued a press
release announcing Royal Ahold's results for the third quarter of 2004. A copy
of this press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                             KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V.


                               /s/ H.R. Ryopponen
                             -----------------------------------------
Date: November 24, 2004      By:    H.R. Ryopponen
                             Title: Executive Vice President and CFO
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



The following exhibit has been filed as part of this Form 6-K:


Exhibit        Description
-------        -----------

99.1           Royal Ahold press release, dated November 24, 2004, announcing
               Royal Ahold's results for the third quarter of 2004
§ 901.44 Hearings. ( a ) *In general.* The Administrative Law Judge shall preside at the hearing on a complaint for the suspension or termination of an enrolled actuary. Hearings shall be stenographically recorded and transcribed and the testimony of witnesses shall be taken under oath or affirmation. Hearings will be conducted pursuant to section 7 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 60 Stat. 241 (5 U.S.C. 556).
( b ) *Failure to appear.* If either party to the proceeding fails to appear at the hearing, after due notice thereof has been sent to the parties, the Administrative Law Judge may make a decision against the absent party by default.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 412 375 386

2 408 375 385

3 432 372 393

4 414 371 385

5 403 369 381

6 414 368 384

7 414 366 383

8 399 367 378

9 411 367 380

10 407 365 381

11 397 362 376

12 402 361 375

13 390 360 372

14 390 356 371

15 393 353 368

16 399 349 365

17 381 344 361

18 376 347 358

19 373 347 357

20 369 346 355

21 372 346 355

22 372 347 356

23 369 347 356

24 369 346 354

25 371 345 353

26 367 343 350

27 362 341 350

28 364 340 349

29 365 340 349

30 375 341 351

31 369 343 351

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Victoria Canal On The Middle River

Period: May 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022