alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,338.08

 2,338.02

 2,337.97

 2,337.91

 2,337.83

 2,337.79

 2,337.73

 2,337.64

 2,337.54

 2,337.47

 2,337.43

 2,337.38

 2,337.50

 2,337.66

 2,338.23

 2,339.25

 2,339.92

 2,340.30

 2,340.58

 2,340.76

 2,340.94

 2,341.09

 2,341.27

 2,341.51

 2,341.72

 2,341.91

 2,342.46

 2,343.10

 2,343.73

 2,345.21

 2,346.83

 1,958.8

 1,957.9

 1,957.2

 1,956.4

 1,955.2

 1,954.6

 1,953.8

 1,952.5

 1,951.1

 1,950.1

 1,949.5

 1,948.8

 1,950.5

 1,952.8

 1,960.9

 1,975.6

 1,985.2

 1,990.7

 1,994.8

 1,997.4

 2,000.0

 2,002.2

 2,004.8

 2,008.3

 2,011.4

 2,014.1

 2,022.1

 2,031.5

 2,040.7

 2,062.5

 2,086.5

STORAGE

-0.7

-0.9

-0.7

-0.9

-1.1

-0.6

-0.9

-1.3

-1.4

-1.0

-0.6

-0.7

+1.7

+2.3

+8.2

+14.6

+9.7

+5.5

+4.1

+2.6

+2.6

+2.2

+2.6

+3.5

+3.1

+2.8

+8.0

+9.4

+9.2

+21.8

+24.0

CHANGE

1,126

713

904

834

708

1,085

992

976

952

866

1,177

928

2,034

1,766

4,354

7,901

5,648

3,243

2,486

2,141

2,150

2,312

2,233

2,569

2,365

2,442

4,507

5,050

4,735

11,051

12,227

INFLOW

 1,466

 1,113

 1,243

 1,228

 1,250

 1,322

 1,365

 1,594

 1,625

 1,320

 1,406

 1,258

 1,116

 594

 241

 492

 740

 424

 390

 814

 827

 1,201

 858

 779

 808

 959

 461

 327

 69

 52

 127

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 21

 34

 21

 38

 34

 50

 59

 29

 46

 50

 59

 29

 55

 21

 4

 25

 38

 47

 51

 13

 9

 13

 56

 30

 17

 90

 0

 9

 9

 17

 4

C.F.S.

 .05

 .08

 .05

 .09

 .08

 .12

 .14

 .07

 .11

 .12

 .14

 .07

 .13

 .05

 .01

 .06

 .09

 .11

 .12

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .13

 .07

 .04

 .21

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .04

 .01

INCHES

 .40

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .02

 .64

 .23

 .35

 .80

 .34

 .00

 .00

 .21

 .25

 .07

 .00

 .17

 .55

 .26

 .46

 1.24

 .05

 1.65

 .31

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 3, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +127.1 92,475 27,469 0 0 978 2.31 8.05

ACRE-FEET +127,100 183,424 54,485 0 0 1,940

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 54,485

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 54,485

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 8.05

JULY 1, 2011 23.29

 1,959.5

(1) (1)
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
     I, Walter Z. Berger, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal yearended February 28, 2003 of Emmis Communications Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004 /s/ WALTER Z. BERGERWalter Z. BergerExecutive Vice President, Treasurer andChief Financial Officer
6
§ 3135.1-1 Transfers. ( a ) Subject to approval of the authorized officer, a lessee may transfer his/her lease(s), or any undivided interest therein, or any legal subdivision, to anyone qualified under §§ 3130.1 and 3132.4 of this title to hold a lease.
( b ) Any approved transfer shall be deemed to be effective on the first day of the lease month following its filing in the proper BLM office, unless, at the request of the parties, an earlier date is specified in the approval.
( c ) The transferor shall continue to be responsible for all obligations under the lease accruing prior to the approval of the transfer.
( d ) The transferee shall be responsible for all obligations under the lease subsequent to the effective date of a transfer, and shall comply with all regulations issued under the Act.
( e ) When a transfer of operating rights (sublease) is approved, the sublessee is responsible for all obligations under the rights transferred to the sublessee.
( f ) Transfers are approved for administrative purposes only. Approval does not warrant or certify that either party to a transfer holds legal or equitable title to a lease.
[46 FR 55497, Nov. 9, 1981, as amended at 53 FR 17359, May 16, 1988; 53 FR 31867, Aug. 22, 1988]
### §348a. Extension of trust period for Indians of Klamath River Reservation

The period of trust on lands allotted to Indians of the Klamath River Reservation, California, which expired July 31, 1919, and the legal title to which is still in the United States, is reimposed and extended for a period of twenty-five years from July 31, 1919: Provided, That further extension of the period of trust may be made by the President, in his discretion, as provided by section 348 and section 391 of this title.

(Dec. 24, 1942, ch. 814, 56 Stat. 1081.)
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 360 293 328

2 359 301 328

3 357 315 343

4 366 310 342

5 352 251 324

6 342 248 316

7 337 237 307

8 338 237 299

9 336 228 302

10 0 0 0

11 334 280 309

12 370 316 332

13 363 297 338

14 389 332 353

15 396 335 356

16 453 333 365

17 449 346 378

18 455 353 388

19 496 358 396

20 471 361 395

21 444 368 398

22 438 354 393

23 417 366 390

24 461 373 405

25 455 385 417

26 425 368 408

27 434 376 403

28 431 369 395

29 405 370 389

30 421 364 384

31 413 366 383

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Victoria Canal On The Middle River

Run Date: 4/14/2024

March 2024
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsParallel Computation of the Jacobian Matrix for Nonlinear Equation Solvers Using MATLABDemonstrating speedup for parallel code on a multicore shared memory PC can be challenging in MATLAB due to underlying parallel operations that are often opaque to the user. This can limit potential for improvement of serial code even for the so-called embarrassingly parallel applications. One such application is the computation of the Jacobian matrix inherent to most nonlinear equation solvers. Computation of this matrix represents the primary bottleneck in nonlinear solver speed such that commercial finite element (FE) and multi-body-dynamic (MBD) codes attempt to minimize computations. A timing study using MATLAB's Parallel Computing Toolbox was performed for numerical computation of the Jacobian. Several approaches for implementing parallel code were investigated while only the single program multiple data (spmd) method using composite objects provided positive results. Parallel code speedup is demonstrated but the goal of linear speedup through the addition of processors was not achieved due to PC architecture.Document ID20170007240Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRose, Geoffrey K.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Nguyen, Duc T.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA, United States)*Newman, Brett A.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 2, 2017Publication DateJanuary 7, 2017Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2017-219655NF1676L-27699L-20845Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 845953.01.03.04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170007240.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3809.570 Under what circumstances may I provide a State-approved financial guarantee? When you provide evidence of an existing financial guarantee under State law or regulations that covers your operations, you are not required to provide a separate financial guarantee under this subpart if— ( a ) The existing financial guarantee is redeemable by the Secretary, acting by and through BLM;
( b ) It is held or approved by a State agency for the same operations covered by your notice(s) or plan(s) of operations; and
( c ) It provides at least the same amount of financial guarantee as required by this subpart.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JHATEEN B. BHATT, AKA Jateen Bipin Bhatt, Petitioner,

v. ERIC HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 12-71667 Agency No. A099-568-616

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted April 8, 2014 San Francisco, California Before: SCHROEDER, LIPEZ ** , and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Jhateen Bhatt, a native and citizen of Tanzania, challenges the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"). The BIA found him removable based on convictions for grand theft and forgery, and statutorily ineligible for a waiver of 

# FILED

MAY 14 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The Honorable Kermit V. Lipez, of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, sitting by designation.inadmissibility under Section 212(h) of th e Immigration and Naturalization Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h). The BIA did not err in finding that Bhatt's conviction for forgery under California Penal Code § 470(b) was an aggr avated felony because it was an offense involving "fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim . . . exceeds $10,000." 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i). The jury's findings included a finding that the forgery caused a loss greater than $200,000. Under the circumstances of this case, that jury finding satisfies the government's burden to prove the circumstances of the crime by clear and convincing evidence. See Nijhawan v. Holder , 557 U.S. 29, 41- 43 (2009). Because we agree that the forgery convic tion is an aggravated felony, we do not decide whether Bhatt's grand thef t conviction under California Penal Code § 487(a), premised on a theory of theft by false pretenses, is a "theft offense" aggravated felony, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G), under the modified categorical approach of Descamps v. United States , 133 S. Ct. 2276 (2013). Also, we note that the government did not argue the grand theft issue in its briefing. The BIA held that Bhatt was ine ligible for a waiver of inadmissibility under INA § 212(h), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h), because his adjustment of status after entering the country was an "admission" as contemplated by the § 212(h) statutory
2bar. After the BIA's decision, this court held in Negrete-Ramirez v. Holder that such an adjustment of status is not an "admission" under § 212(h). 741 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2014). Because the BIA did not c onsider Bhatt to be statutorily eligible for a waiver of inadmissibility, it did not d ecide whether he merited further relief. We thus must remand for consideration of possible relief given that the § 212(h) bar does not apply. The petition is therefore DENIED with respect to the forgery conviction, and GRANTED with respect to statutory eligib ility for a waiver of inadmissibility under INA § 212(h). We REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Each side to bear its own costs.

3
BAT丁ERY LOG

! ¥、○○_/ ¥、_/ �DATE �# �START% �END% �FしiGH丁# ��CHARGING ����� �BAT「ERYCY

**春 ��X �X �X �0-2与% �#1 �#2 �#3 

*掌* ��*** �X �X �2与-与0% � � � 

牽*掌 ��*** �事** �X �与0-7与% � � � 

**春 ��*暮* �*** �*** �7与-100% � � � 

DISCHARGiNG ����� � � � 

タ  音,弱音 ���� �87.与-100% � � � 

春春* �7与-87.与% � � � 

X �62.与-7与% � � � 

春*暮 X �X �与0-62.与% � � � 

X �37.与-与0% �� � 

*** �X �X �2与-37.与% � � � 

X ���X �X �1之.与-2与% � � � 

*** ��X �X �X �0-12.与% � � ̅ � 

X ��X �X �X �0% � � � 

BA○○丁ERYLIFE ����� � � � 

90-100% �� � 

春奪* �80-90% 70-80% � � � 

X ������ �� 

) �� ���*** �X �60-70% � � � 

X �X �与0-60% � � � 

蕩 袈 �∴∴; !∴∴∴ 零** ���X �X �40-与0% � � � 

3 ��X ���X �X �30-40% � � � 

牽暮* �X ��X �X �20-30% � � � 

X �X ��X �X �20%OR」ESS �� � 

#1-S/N 3221143814486 #2-S/N D」O70014062411608 #3-S/N DJO700114070105502
##### 



Exhibit 99.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Provident Energy Trust (the
Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas
W. Buchanan, Chief Executive Officer of Provident Energy Ltd., who performs the
same function for the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|    |  |                                                                     | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|By: |  | /s/ Thomas W. Buchanan                                             
|    |  | Thomas W. Buchanan
Chief Executive Officer of Provident Energy Ltd.

May 21, 2003
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      Brett
      M. Clark, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on
      Form
      10QSB of General Environmental Management, Inc. for the quarterly period ending
      September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
      in the Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of General Environmental
      Management, Inc. of Nevada.


Date:
                  November
                  14, 2007
              By:
              /s/ Brett
                M. ClarkBrett
                M. ClarkExecutive
                  Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, John H. Elms, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SpectraLink
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. May 10, 2004 /s/ JOHN H. ELMSBy: President and Chief Executive Officer
 32
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2018, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures
Inc.





|Date: April 7, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                    |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
Bibliography

Installation, Start-Up, and Operating Instructions:58MCA

Product Data: 58MCA

Installation, Start-Up, and Operating Instructions:58MSA

Product Data: 58MSA

Installation, Start-Up, and Operating Instructions:58MXA

Product Data: 58MXA

Installation, Start-Up, and Operating Instructions: 58MTA

Product Data: 58MTA

Product Data: 58MVP

Installation, Start-Up, and Operating Instructions: 58MVP

Product Data: 351DAS

Installation, Start-Up, and Operating Instructions: 351DAS

ABA 80-Plus Spec Sheet

Multi-Position Furnace Installer's Information Manual

CSA 90-Plus Spec Sheet

High Efficiency Downflow/Horizontal Furnace Installer's Information Manual

CSA 90-Plus Spec Sheet

High Efficiency Upflow Furnace Installer's Information Manual

Ducane Gas Furnace: Fits-All 95 (CMPB)

Installation and Servicing Instructions and User's Information Manual (CMPE)

Installation Instructions upflow or Left Horizontal Gas-Fired Condensing Warm Air Furnace (AF90)

Aire-Flo 90

Fits-All 95 Upflow/Horizontal-Left Models (CMPE)

Fits-All 92 Downflow/Horizontal-Right (CMPB)

Installation and Servicing Instructions and User's Information Manual (CMPB)

High Efficiency Gas Furnace (G2D95AC)

Fits-All 80 Mid-Efficiency Furnace (MPGA)

Installation and Servicing Instructions and User's Information Manual (MPGA)

Aire-Flo 80

Horizontal 80 (FPBB)

Installation and Servicing Instructions and User's Information Manual (FPBB)

Downflow Gas Furnace (DPGB)

Installation and Servicing Instructions and User's Information Manual (DPGB)

High Efficiency Gas Furnace (G2D95AU)

Engineering Data: G40DF

Installation Instructions: GUCA/GCCA

Product Specification: GUCA/GCCA

Installation Instructions: GUIC/GCIC

Specification Sheet: GCIC

Specification Sheet: GUIA/B/C/D

Installation Instructions: GUVA/GCVA
Specification Sheet: GCVA

Specification Sheet: GUVA

Installation Instructions: GUID

Specification Sheet: GUID
SeriesName Notes

58MCA

58MCA

58MSA

58MSA

58MXA

58MXA

58MTA

58MTA

58MVP

58MVP

351DAS

351DAS

ABA

ABA

CSA

CSA

VSA

VSA

CMPB

CMPB

CMPB

CMPB

CMPB

CMPB

CMPB

G2D95BC

MPGA

MPGA

MPGA

FPBB

FPBB

DPGB

DPGB

G2D95BU

G40

GUCA/GCCA

GUCA/GCCA

GUCA/GCCA

GUIC/GCIC

GUIC/GCIC

GUIC/GCIC

GCVA-GUVA
GCVA-GUVA

GCVA-GUVA

GCID/GUID

GCID/GUID