alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted for Century
Properties Growth Fund XXII 1999 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000740156
<NAME> CENTURY PROPERTIES GROWTH FUND XXII
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         132,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         72,967
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,294
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,322
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       657
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.99<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 23.3 Definitions. As used in the regulations in this part: ( a ) *Mineral leasing acts* means the Mineral Leasing Act of February 25, 1920, as amended and supplemented (30 U.S.C. 181-287) and the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands (30 U.S.C. 351-359);
( b ) *Mining Supervisor* means the Area Mining Supervisor, or his authorized representative, of the Geological Survey authorized as provided in 30 CFR 211.3 and 231.2 to supervise operations on the land covered by a permit or lease;
( c ) *District manager* means the manager of the district office or other authorized officer of the Bureau of Land Management having administrative jurisdiction of and responsibility for the land covered by a permit, lease, contract, application, or offer;
( d ) *Overburden* means all the earth and other materials which lie above a natural deposit of minerals and such earth and other materials after removal from their natural state in the process of mining;
( e ) Area of land to be affected or area of land affected means the area of land from which overburden is to be or has been removed and upon which the overburden or waste is to be or has been deposited, and includes all lands affected by the construction of new roads or the improvement or use of existing roads to gain access to an operation and for haulage;
( f ) *Operation* means all of the premises, facilities, roads, and equipment used in the process of determining the location, composition or quality of a mineral deposit, or in developing, extracting, or onsite processing of a mineral deposit in a designated area;
( g ) *Method of operation* means the method or manner by which a cut or open pit is made, the overburden is placed or handled, water is controlled or affected and other pacts performed by the operator in the process of exploring or uncovering and removing or onsite processing of a mineral deposit;
( h ) Holder or Operator means the permittee, leasee, or contractor designated in a permit, lease, or contract;
( i ) *Reclamation* means measures undertaken to bring about the necessary reconditioning or restoration of land or water that has been affected by exploration or mineral development, mining or onsite processing operations, and waste disposal, in ways which will prevent or control onsite and offsite damage to the environment.
[34 FR 852, Jan. 18, 1969, as amended at 38 FR 10009, Apr. 23, 1973; 48 FR 27016, June 10, 1983]
#### § 2804.13 Will BLM keep my information confidential?

BLM will keep confidential any information in your application that you mark as “confidential” or “proprietary” to the extent allowed by law.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4519 

To prohibit the Federal Government from promoting, supporting, or contracting with abortion entities, or otherwise expanding access to abortions 

on Federal lands or in Federal facilities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2022 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. RISCH, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. 

WICKER, Mr. DAINES, Mr. THUNE, Mr. HAWLEY, and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Federal Government from promoting, supporting, or contracting with abortion entities, or otherwise expanding access to abortions on Federal lands or 

in Federal facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibiting Abortion 

5 on Federal Lands Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4519 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PRO2 MOTION OF ABORTIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Federal Government shall 

4 not promote, support, or enter into contracts with abortion 

5 entities, or otherwise expand access to abortions on Fed6 eral lands or in Federal facilities, including military instal7 lations, national parks, court houses, and other Federal 

8 buildings. 

9 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

10 (1) ABORTION.—The term ‘‘abortion’’ means 

11 the use or prescription of any instrument, medicine, 

12 drug, or other substance or device to intentionally 

13 kill the unborn child of a women known to be preg14 nant, or prematurely terminate the pregnancy of a 

15 woman known to be pregnant, with an intention 

16 other than to increase the probability of a live birth 

17 or of preserving the life or health of the child after 

18 live birth, or remove a dead unborn child. 

19 (2) ABORTION ENTITY.—The term ‘‘abortion 

20 entity’’ means an entity, including its affiliates, sub21 sidiaries, successors, and clinics, that performs, in22 duces, refers for, or counsels in favor of abortions, 

23 or provides financial support to any other organiza24 tion that conducts such activities on Federal lands 

25 or in Federal facilities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
(No. *579*

Claim denied.)

#### Henry Himsteadt, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 29, 1925.*

*Quarantine*— non-liahility *of State.*This ease is-similar to that of *Maze*v. *State, supra,*and the decision of the court there announced governs this case, as to the non-liability of the State.

Turner, Holder *&*Burlington, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

Henry Himsteadt, the claimant, files his declaration asking for an award in the sum of $650.00 claiming that is the value of straw burned on his premises in the year of 1921 by order of the Agricultural Department of the State of Illinois in the quarantined district embracing his lands and the lands of many other farmers in which they were quarantined against an infection known as “Flag Smut.”

In that same year the said department ordered his straw and all other straw in the infected district to be burned, which accordingly was done, and his claim is so filed.

In the case of Joseph Maze, against the State of Illinois, in Case *No. 21,*an opinion was filed on the 28th day of January, 1925, embracing the same facts as the case at bar.

The opinion is written fully in the last above named report and states our entire reasons for the opinion expressed therein, and the same governs in this case and for the reasons « expressed in the case heretofore mentioned. The claim is therefore disallowed, demurrer is sustained and the case dismissed.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case therefore is ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 9/10/96 TENTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM T. RICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs. No. 95-3147 (D.C. No. 93-CV-2545) XEROX CORPORATION, a New York (D. Kan.) corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. ** Plaintiff William T. Ricks appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Xerox Corporation on Plaintiff’s claim of employment discrimination in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213. SeeRicks v. Xerox Corp. , 877 F. Supp. 1468 (D. Kan. 1995). Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no genuinely disputed material issues-2-

of fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). We review a summary judgment de novo, viewing the record in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Ball v. Renner , 54 F.3d 664, 665 (10th Cir. 1995). Upon careful consideration of the record, the briefs of the parties, the district court’s order, and the applicable law, we find no reversible error and affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s order. AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge
#### § 3622.2 Procedures; permits.

No application or permit for free use is required except for specimens over 250 pounds in weight. The authorized officer may issue permits, using the procedures of subpart 3604 of this chapter, for the removal of such specimens if the applicant certifies that they will be displayed to the public in a museum or similar institution.

[48 FR 27015, June 10, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 58909, Nov. 23, 2001]
§ 35.4 Investigation. ( a ) If the investigating official concludes that a subpoena pursuant to the authority conferred by 31 U.S.C. 3804(a) is warranted— ( 1 ) The subpoena so issued shall notify the person to whom it is addressed of the authority under which the subpoena is issued and shall identify the records or documents sought;
( 2 ) The investigating official may designate a person to act on his or her behalf to receive the documents sought; and
( 3 ) The person receiving such subpoena shall be required to tender to the investigating official or the person designated to receive the documents a certification that the documents sought have been produced, or that such documents are not available and the reasons therefor, or that such documents, suitably identified, have been withheld based upon the assertion of an identified privilege.
( b ) If the investigating official concludes that an action under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act may be warranted, the investigating official shall submit a report containing the findings and conclusions of such investigation to the reviewing official.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall preclude or limit the investigating official's discretion to refer allegations directly to the Department of Justice for suit under the False Claims Act or other civil relief, or to defer or postpone a report or referral to the reviewing official to avoid interference with a criminal investigation or prosecution.
( d ) Nothing in this section modifies any responsibility of the investigating official to report violations of criminal law to the Attorney General.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Land Between the Lakes Advisory Board will hold a meeting on Thursday, October 28, 2004. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2. 

The meeting agenda includes the following:

(1) Welcome/Introductions/Agenda; 

(2) Advisory Board Membership; 

(3) Land and Resource Management Plan Update; 

(4) Conservation Education; 

(5) Four Threats; 

(6) Tour of Turkey Bay; 

(7) Board Discussion of Comments Received; 

(8) LBL Updates. 

The meeting is open to the public. Written comments are invited and may be mailed to: William P. Lisowsky, Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 42211. Written comments must be received at Land Between The Lakes by October 20, 2004, in order for copies to be provided to the members at the meeting. Board members will review written comments received, and at their request, oral clarification may be requested at a future meeting. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Thursday, October 28, 2004, 8:30 a.m. to 3:15 p.m., c.s.t. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the USDA Forest Service Administrative Building, Land Between the Lakes, and will be open to the public. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sharon Byers, Advisory Board Liaison, Land Between the Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 42211, (270) 924-2002. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None. 

Dated: September 24, 2004. 

William P. Lisowsky, 

Area Supervisor, Land Between the Lakes. 

[FR Doc. 04-22256 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
null

86.11153
### §3101. Findings

The Congress finds and declares that—

(1) the forest lands of Indians are among their most valuable resources and Indian forest lands—

(A) encompass more than 15,990,000 acres, including more than 5,700,000 acres of commercial forest land and 8,700,000 acres of woodland,

(B) are a perpetually renewable and manageable resource,

(C) provide economic benefits, including income, employment, and subsistence, and

(D) provide natural benefits, including ecological, cultural, and esthetic values;

(2) the United States has a trust responsibility toward Indian forest lands;

(3) existing Federal laws do not sufficiently assure the adequate and necessary trust management of Indian forest lands;

(4) the Federal investment in, and the management of, Indian forest land is significantly below the level of investment in, and management of, National Forest Service forest land, Bureau of Land Management forest land, or private forest land;

(5) tribal governments make substantial contributions to the overall management of Indian forest land; and

(6) there is a serious threat to Indian forest lands arising from trespass and unauthorized harvesting of Indian forest land resources.

(Pub. L. 101–630, title III, §302, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4532.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2004 Amendment

Pub. L. 108–278, §1, July 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 868, provided that: "This Act [enacting section 3115a of this title and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 3115b of this title] may be cited as the 'Tribal Forest Protection Act of 2004'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 101–630, title III, §301, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4532, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'National Indian Forest Resources Management Act'."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 508.20

 508.99

 508.77

 508.87

 508.87

 508.49

 508.70

 508.40

 508.23

 508.52

 508.49

 508.57

 508.43

 508.01

 507.92

 508.36

 508.29

 508.36

 508.87

 508.77

 508.75

 508.20

 508.59

 509.07

 508.83

 508.36

 507.95

 507.95

 508.27

 508.67

 64,735

 65,708

 65,437

 65,560

 65,560

 65,092

 65,351

 64,981

 64,772

 65,129

 65,092

 65,191

 65,018

 64,501

 64,392

 64,932

 64,846

 64,932

 65,560

 65,437

 65,412

 64,735

 65,215

 65,807

 65,511

 64,932

 64,428

 64,428

 64,821

 65,314

STORAGE

-345

+973

-271

+123

+0

-468

+259

-370

-209

+357

-37

+99

-173

-517

-109

+540

-86

+86

+628

-123

-25

-677

+480

+592

-296

-579

-504

+0

+393

+493

CHANGE

2,223

2,872

2,176

2,401

2,400

2,328

2,695

2,365

2,443

2,729

2,585

2,622

2,595

2,498

2,682

3,001

2,690

2,803

3,067

2,683

2,760

2,431

2,989

2,988

2,508

2,418

2,539

2,838

3,050

2,910

INFLOW

 1,877

 1,878

 1,883

 1,881

 1,881

 1,882

 1,880

 1,878

 1,864

 1,874

 1,878

 1,826

 1,880

 1,877

 1,876

 1,875

 1,876

 1,876

 1,875

 1,878

 1,880

 1,876

 1,876

 1,879

 1,880

 1,877

 1,873

 1,873

 1,873

 1,877

POWER

 445

 447

 353

 302

 376

 499

 548

 596

 595

 595

 656

 691

 693

 730

 785

 786

 785

 797

 788

 791

 799

 786

 789

 733

 695

 691

 685

 772

 887

 631

SPILL

 65

 43

 61

 136

 129

 169

 123

 67

 78

 64

 59

 44

 99

 141

 63

 53

 58

 70

 75

 62

 80

 98

 69

 62

 69

 123

 216

 174

 73

 134

OUTLET

 10

 13

 16

 20

 14

 14

 13

 11

 11

 16

 11

 11

 10

 11

 13

 15

 14

 17

 12

 14

 14

 12

 13

 16

 13

 19

 19

 19

 19

 19

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2003 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 07/17/2003

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +234 79,289 56,259 19,726 2,757 429

ACRE-FEET +234 157,270 111,590 39,127 5,469 851

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 111,590

SPILL 39,127 156,186

 65,080

OUTLET 5,469

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,205

 2,733

 1,707

 2,206

 2,342

 2,190

 2,483

 2,295

 2,315

 2,549

 2,518

 2,553

 2,549

 2,465

 2,616

 2,924

 2,636

 2,687

 3,002

 2,669

 2,760

 2,440

 2,969

 2,955

 2,436

 2,402

 2,452

 2,789

 3,034

 2,818

 76,699

 152,132

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
Document

Exhibit 10.1



Director Compensation 


The members of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) who are not employees of the Company (the “Non-Employee Directors”) receive (i) an annual retainer of $50,000, (ii) an award of restricted share units with a grant date value of $50,000 granted annually on the date of the Company’s Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (with $25,000 of the value based on the closing price of the Company’s Class A voting common shares and $25,000 of the value based the Company’s Class B non-voting common shares, on the last trading day prior to the grant date and the number of units rounded to the nearest whole unit) (which award may instead be granted by the Board as a fixed amount of cash vesting in annual installments over three years following the date of grant) and (iii) the other retainers and fees set forth in the table below. The restricted share units vest in annual installments over three years following the date of grant and are paid in an equivalent number of the Company’s Class A voting common shares and the Company’s Class B non-voting common shares. Pursuant to the Company’s policies, directors are also reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of their duties.


						
	Type of Compensation	Amount of Compensation
		
	Annual Retainer	$50,000
	Audit & Risk Committee Chair Retainer	$15,000
	Other Committee Chair Retainer	$10,000
	Committee Meeting Retainer 	$1,400 per meeting
	Chairman of the Board Retainer	$52,000
	Annual Equity Grant Value	$50,000
		




The retainers and fees for the Non-Employee Directors are paid, at the director’s election, in all cash, 50% in cash and 50% in the form of the Company’s common shares (with the 50% portion that will be paid in shares to be paid 50% in the Company’s Class A voting common shares and 50% in the Company’s Class B non-voting common shares), or 100% in the form of the Company’s common shares (with 50% to be paid in the Company’s Class A voting common shares and 50% in the Company’s Class B non-voting common shares). However, the Board retains discretion to provide for the retainers for one or more directors to be paid in a different mix of cash and the Company’s common shares (whether in Class A shares, Class B shares or a combination thereof) as it determines appropriate. Retainers are paid in two installments each year, with the number of the Company’s common shares to be delivered in payment of any retainer to be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the retainer to be paid in the form of the Company’s common shares by the average closing price of the Company’s common shares (either Class A shares or Class B shares, as applicable) for the previous five (5) business days prior to payment, and are fully vested at the time of payment.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Brett
M. Clark, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of General Environmental Management, Inc. for the quarterly period ending
September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of General Environmental
Management, Inc. of Nevada.





Date:
                November
      23, 2009
                
                By:
                /s/
      Brett M. ClarkBrett
      M. Clark, Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial
    Officer