alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of AE Biofuels, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report " ),
      I,
      Eric McAfee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/
                Eric McAfeeEric
              McAfeeChief Executive
              Officer




December
      13, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4683 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4683

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for a review of the 
    characterization or terms of discharge from the Armed Forces of 
  individuals with mental health disorders alleged to affect terms of 
                               discharge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2016

Mr. Coffman (for himself, Mr. Walz, Mr. Zeldin, Miss Rice of New York, 
 Mr. King of New York, Mr. Jones, Mr. Russell, Mr. Zinke, Mr. Moulton, 
 Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Murphy of Florida, and Mr. Gallego) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for a review of the 
    characterization or terms of discharge from the Armed Forces of 
  individuals with mental health disorders alleged to affect terms of 
                               discharge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness for Veterans Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. REVIEW OF CHARACTERIZATION OR TERMS OF DISCHARGE FROM THE ARMED 
              FORCES OF INDIVIDUALS WITH MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS 
              ALLEGED TO AFFECT TERMS OF DISCHARGE.

    Section 1553(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3)(A) In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2), 
in the case of a former member described in subparagraph (B), the board 
shall--
            ``(i) review medical evidence of the Secretary of Veterans 
        Affairs or a civilian health care provider that is presented by 
        the former member; and
            ``(ii) review the case with a rebuttable presumption in 
        favor of the former member that post-traumatic stress disorder 
        or traumatic brain injury materially contributed to the 
        circumstances resulting in the discharge of a lesser 
        characterization.
    ``(B) A former member described in this subparagraph is a former 
member described in paragraph (1) or a former member whose application 
for relief is based in whole or in part on matters relating to post-
traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury as supporting 
rationale or as justification for priority consideration whose post-
traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury is related to 
combat or military sexual trauma, as determined by the Secretary 
concerned.''.
                                 <all>
```
Table 21

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Preliminary-Subject to Change Central Valley Project - California

Monthly Diversions in AF 2020

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

CANALS

Contra Costa 6624 6999 5974 8239 10161 11076 12101 11793 11285 9622 6697 3857 104428

Delta-Mendota 256214 95862 162145 114461 57291 153776 245319 255017 236798 193974 87058 51948 1909863

Actual Fed Dos Amigos 32828 74102 20439 41131 79170 100749 104182 58680 23117 39420 14922 588740

Madera 0 0 0 0 12827 42104 46449 14705 0 0 0 0 116085

Friant-Kern 8498 41411 4543 7158 45695 84058 130085 98577 59156 39120 2311 0 520612

Corning 0 304 535 1393 2054 1460 3133 1585 1303 784 84 93 12728

Folsom-South 376 580 362 327 800 1201 1050 620 488 1539 717 290 8350

Tehama-Colusa 0 12988 23438 35077 51459 38060 41947 25653 15680 18169 9049 2138 273658

CACHUMA PROJECT

Tecolete Tunnel 538 1110 724 979 1556 1686 1971 2119 1929 1779 1515 1697 17603

ORLAND PROJECT

Stony Creek 0 1436 2085 8329 11882 13498 14757 14542 10866 8759 0 0 86154

North Canal 0 597 639 334 5111 5244 5792 5574 4608 3535 0 0 31434

South Canal 0 839 1446 4985 6771 8254 8965 8968 6258 5224 0 0 51710

SOLANO PROJECT

Putah South Canal 3037 2040 9563 14780 24598 32714 34331 27279 19770 15593 1747 1858 187310
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

RAYMUNDO PALERMO-HERNANDEZ, 

AKA Adan Baez-Cruz, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 20-10035 

 20-10036

D.C. Nos. 

4:16-cr-02372-CKJ-EJM-1

4:19-cr-01192-CKJ-EJM-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 20, 2021**

Before: McKEOWN, CALLAHAN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Raymundo Palermo-Hernandez appeals from 

the 41-month sentence imposed for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 

U.S.C. § 1326, and the 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised 

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-10035 & 20-10036

Palermo-Hernandez contends that the district court procedurally erred by 

failing to consider his arguments and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors,

and by failing to explain adequately the sentence. We review for plain error, see

United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and 

conclude that there is none. The record reflects that the district court considered 

Palermo-Hernandez’s arguments for a shorter and fully concurrent sentence, 

considered the relevant § 3553(a) sentencing factors, and adequately explained its 

determination that the aggregate, partially consecutive sentence was warranted. 

See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc); see also 

United States v. Perez-Perez, 512 F.3d 514, 516 (9th Cir. 2008) (a sentencing 

judge need not expressly address every sentencing argument).

Palermo-Hernandez next contends that the revocation sentence is 

substantively unreasonable because it does not run fully concurrent to the sentence 

for his new criminal conviction. The aggregate sentence is substantively 

reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) factors and the totality of the 

circumstances, including, as the district court noted, Palermo-Hernandez’s

significant immigration and criminal history. See United States v. Gall, 552 U.S.

38, 51 (2007); see also U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21945]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on July 19, 
2004, Noramco Inc., 1440 Olympic Drive, Athens, Georgia 30601, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Codeine-N-Oxide (9053).....................  I
Morphine-N-Oxide (9307)....................  I
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Codeine (9050).............................  II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
Morphine (9300)............................  II
Thebaine (9333)............................  II
Sufentanil (9740)..........................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the Schedule I 
products for internal testing; the Schedule II product will be 
manufactured for distribution to a customer.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCD) and must be filed no later than November 27, 2004.

    Dated: September 16, 2004.
William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-21945 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4401-09-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Everado OSORIO-ESCAMILLA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40260.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard Nicholas Jeffrey, Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*345Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Everado Osorio-Escamilla has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v, California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Osorio-Escamilla has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief, Osorio-Escamilla’s response and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
§ 1864.1-1 Filing of application. ( a ) Any entity claiming title to lands may file an application to have a disclaimer of interest issued if there is reason to believe that a cloud exists on the title to the lands as a result of a claim or potential claim of the United States and that such lands are not subject to any valid claim of the United States.
( b ) Before you actually file an application you should meet with BLM to determine if the regulations in this subpart apply to you.
( c ) You must file your application for a disclaimer of interest with the proper BLM office as listed in § 1821.10 of this title.
[68 FR 502, Jan. 6, 2003]
### §9405. Imposition of additional sanctions with respect to persons responsible for human rights abuses

#### (a) In general

Not later than 90 days after August 2, 2017, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a list of each person the Secretary determines, based on credible evidence, on or after August 2, 2017—

(1) is responsible for extrajudicial killings, torture, or other gross violations of internationally recognized human rights committed against individuals in Iran who seek—

(A) to expose illegal activity carried out by officials of the Government of Iran; or

(B) to obtain, exercise, defend, or promote internationally recognized human rights and freedoms, such as the freedoms of religion, expression, association, and assembly, and the rights to a fair trial and democratic elections; or

(2) acts as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign person in a matter relating to an activity described in paragraph (1).

#### (b) Sanctions described

#### (1) In general

The President may, in accordance with the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), block all transactions in all property and interests in property of a person on the list required by subsection (a) if such property and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are or come within the possession or control of a United States person.

#### (2) Penalties

A person that violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of paragraph (1) or any regulation, license, or order issued to carry out paragraph (1) shall be subject to the penalties set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) to the same extent as a person that commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) of that section.

(Pub. L. 115–44, title I, §106, Aug. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 893.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is title II of Pub. L. 95–223, Dec. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1626, which is classified generally to chapter 35 (§1701 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1701 of Title 50 and Tables.
SCWC-29794, SCWC-29795, SCWC-29796 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

SCWC-29794 STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. NELSON KUUALOHA ARMITAGE, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. (CASE NO. 2P106-02017)

SCWC-29795 STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. RUSSELL K. KAHOOKELE, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

(CASE NO. 2P106-02018)

SCWC-29796 STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. HENRY MAILE NOA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

(CASE NO. 2P106-01909)

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NOS. 29794, 29795, and 29796; CASE NOS. 2P106-02017,

2P106-02018, and 2P106-01909) Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29794 24-OCT-2013 01:15 PMORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Rec ktenwald, C.J., Na kayama, A coba, McK enna, and Pollack, JJ.)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on September 16, 2013 by Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants Nelson Kuualoha Armitage, Russel Kahookele, and Henry Maile Noa is hereby accepted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that no oral argument will be held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that within 10 days from the date of this order, each of the parties shall file a supplemental brief not to exceed five pages in length, addressing whether the Complaint must be dismissed without prejudice under State v. Apollonio, No. SCWC–11–0000695, 2013 WL 5574921 (October 10, 2013), because it did not allege the state of mind required to commit the offense of Entrance into the Reserve, Hawai # i Administrative Rule § 13-261-10.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, October 24, 2013. Daniel G. Hempey, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioners /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

2
### §62. Discontinuance and transfer of agencies

The President shall, whenever he may judge it expedient, discontinue any Indian agency, or transfer the same, from the place or tribe designated by law, to such other place or tribe as the public service may require.

(R.S. §2059.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2059 derived from act June 30, 1834, ch. 162, §4, 4 Stat. 735.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation to Secretary of the Interior of authority vested in President by this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 10250, June 5, 1951, 16 F.R. 5385, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code),  each
of the undersigned  officers of Wien Group,  Inc., a New York  corporation  (the
"Company"),  do hereby  certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company
on Form  10-KSB for the  fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities & Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that:

         (1)      the 10-KSB  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
                  sections  13(a) and 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
                  1934; and,

         (2)      the   information   contained  in  the  10-KSB  Report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: September 25, 2004               BY:  /S/  STEPHEN S. WEIN
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             STEPHEN S. WIEN,
                                             Chief Executive Officer &
                                             Chief Financial Officer
#### § 3216.13 What are my responsibilities after I transfer my interest?

After you transfer an interest in a lease you are still responsible for rents, royalties, compensatory royalties, and other obligations that accrued before your transfer became effective. You also remain responsible for plugging and abandoning any wells that were drilled or existing on the lease while you held your interest. You must carry out this responsibility upon the BLM's determination at any future time that the wells must be plugged and abandoned.
### §566g. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 99–398, §9, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 851, which set out definitions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 320th District Court of Potter County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on September

30, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Malcolm Brown v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-15-00322-CR Trial Court Number: 69690-D

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated September 30, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on December 16, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
§ 3175.125 Calculation of heating value and volume ( a ) The heating value of the gas sampled must be calculated as follows: ( 1 ) Gross heating value is defined by API 14.5, Subsection 3.7 (incorporated by reference, see § 3175.30) and must be calculated under API 14.5, Subsection 7.1 (incorporated by reference, see § 3175.30); and
( 2 ) Real heating value must be calculated by dividing the gross heating value of the gas calculated under paragraph (a)(1) of this section by the compressibility factor of the gas at 14.73 psia and 60 °F.
( b ) *Average heating value determination.* ( 1 ) If a lease, unit PA, or CA has more than one FMP, the average heating value for the lease, unit PA, or CA for a reporting month must be the volume-weighted average of heating values, calculated as follows:
( 2 ) If the effective date of a heating value for an FMP is other than the first day of the reporting month, the average heating value of the FMP must be the volume-weighted average of heating values, determined as follows: Where: HVi = the heating value for FMPi, in Btu/scf HVi,j = the heating value for FMPi, for partial month j, in Btu/scf Vi,j = the volume measured by FMPi, for partial month j, in Btu/scf Subscript i represents each FMP for the lease, unit PA, or CA Subscript j represents a partial month for which heating value HVi,j is effective m = the number of different heating values in a reporting month for an FMP
( c ) The volume must be determined under § 3175.94 (mechanical recorders) or § 3175.103(c) (EGM systems).
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**23 TP 11-01686**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF MILTON RUFFIN, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (NORMAN P. EFFMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (OWEN DEMUTH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H. Dadd, A.J.], entered August 11, 2011) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Entered: February 10, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### § 3154.3 Bond cancellation or termination of liability.

The authorized officer shall not consent to the cancellation of the bond or the termination of liability unless and until the terms and conditions of the notice of intent or permit have been met. Should the authorized officer fail to notify the party within 90 days of the filing of a notice of completion of the need for additional action by the operator to rehabilitate the lands, liability for that particular exploration operation shall automatically terminate.

[53 FR 17359, May 16, 1988; 53 FR 31867, Aug. 22, 1988]
### SUBCHAPTER IV—INDIAN BUSINESS GRANTS