alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3430.2-1 Initial showing. All preference right coal lease applications shall have contained or shall have been supplemented by the timely submission of: ( a ) Information on the quantity and quality of the coal resources discovered within the boundaries of the prospecting permit area, including an average proximate analysis, sulfur content and BTU content of the coal, and all supporting geological and geophysical data used to develop the required information. ( 1 ) Coal quantity shall be indicated by structural maps of the tops of all beds to be mined, isopachous maps of beds to be mined and interburden; and, for beds to be mined by surface mining methods, isopachous maps of the overburden. These maps shall show the location of test holes and outcrops. An estimate of the measured and indicated reserves for each bed to be mined shall be included.
( 2 ) Coal quality data shall include, at a minimum, an average proximate analysis, sulfur content, and BTU content of the coal in each bed to be mined. Also, all supporting geological and geophysical data used to develop the required information shall be submitted.
( b ) Topographic maps as available from state or Federal sources showing physical features, drainage patterns, roads and vehicle trails, utility systems, and water sources. The location of proposed development and mining operations facilities shall be identified on the maps. These maps shall include the approximate locations and extent of tailings and overburden storage areas; location and size of pit areas; and the location of water sources or other resources that may be used in the proposed operation and facilities incidental to that use.
( c ) A narrative statement that includes: ( 1 ) The anticipated scope of operations, the schedule of operations, and the types of equipment to be used;
( 2 ) The mining method to be used and an estimate of the expected mining sequence and production rate; and
( 3 ) The relationship, if any, between operations planned on the land applied for and existing or planned operations and facilities on adjacent lands.
( d ) The authorized officer may request from the applicant, or the applicant may submit, any other information necessary to conduct an environmental analysis of the proposed mining operation, formulate mitigating measures and lease terms and determine commercial quantities.
[44 FR 42628, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33143, July 30, 1982]
### NUMBER 13 - 16 - 00 229 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MANUEL ABELARDO ROJA S , A ppellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the 370 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Manuel Abelardo Rojas, attempts a second appeal of his August 13, 2008 conviction for indecency with a child in trial court cause number CR

- 1349

- 08

- G

.2

T his Court previously issued a memorandum opinion and judgment on January 15, 2009 , regarding this trial court cause nu mber in cause number 13

- 08

- 000673

- CR

. 1
Th is Court lacks jurisdiction to consider a second appeal from appellant’s final conviction. The exclusive post

- conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Te x as Code of Criminal Procedure
11.07

. T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 11.07, § 5 (West , Westlaw through 2015 R.S. ) (providing that “[a]fter conviction, the procedure outlined in this Act shall be exclusive and any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the prisoner”); Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S. W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISS ED for lack of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3(a), 43.2(f)

. PER CURIAM
Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed the 1 9 th day of May, 2016

.

1 This Court dismissed the appeal because the trial court ’ s certificatio n did not show the defendant had the right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER APPROVING THE AMENDMENT

OF THE COMMENTS TO RULE S 11 3.1

, 420, 513, AND 578 OF THE

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CRIMINAL

PROCEDURE :

:

:

:

:

:

:

: NO. 533

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1 st day of December , 20 21 , upon the recommendation of the

Criminal Procedural Rules Committee ; the proposal having been submitted without

publication pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. 103(a) :

I t is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Consti tution of Pennsylvania

that the Comments to Rules 113.1, 420, 513, and 578 of the Pennsylvania Rules of

Criminal Procedure are amended in the attached form.

This O rder shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. 103(b), and shall be

effective on January 1, 2022

.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
Sacramento

River

T14N R1E

CCOOLLUUSSAA CC OO

SSUUTTTT

18

7

17

19

8

20

70.4 R

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

Contract No. 14-06-200-8118A-R-1

Exhibit B

Beckley, Ralph and Ophelia

725-202-7

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.25 0.5

Miles

Date: October 28, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\beckley_ralph_ophelia\beckley.mxd
#### § 3481.4 Temporary interruption in coal severance.
§ 3270.11 What general standards apply to my utilization operations? Your utilization operations must: ( a ) Meet all operational and environmental standards;
( b ) Prevent unnecessary impacts on surface and subsurface resources;
( c ) Result in the maximum ultimate recovery of geothermal resources;
( d ) Result in the beneficial use of geothermal resources, with minimum waste;
( e ) Protect public health, safety, and property; and
( f ) Comply with the requirements of § 3200.4.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Carrie Adams, Appellant, against Hastings Pavement Company et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
Motion Granted; Order filed February 2 , 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 00149

- CR

____________ MARVIN DWAYNE SMITH , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1147188



### ORDER
On November 29, 2011, this court abated the appeal on appellant’s motion because appellant argued he was denied counsel during the thirty

- day time period for filing a motion for new trial. Appel lant has now filed a motion to supplement the record with his motion for new trial, the record of the hearing on the motion, and the court’s ruling.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk ’ s record on
or before February 21 , 20 12 , containing appellant’s motion for new trial, the trial court’s ruling, and any other supporting documents regarding appellant’s motion for new trial.2

Janet Ragan, the official court reporter of the 230th District Court, is ordered to file

a repor ter’s record of the hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial. If no record was taken, the court reporter should file a document with this court notifying the court that no
record was taken.

PER CURIAM
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Harvey Keesler, Deceased. Elizabeth W. Keesler, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harvey Keesler, Deceased, Appellant; Olive M. McGirr, Respondent.

No opinion. Appeal from original order dated August 13, 1948, dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 5

May 31, 2000

Newmont Mining Corporation
1700 Lincoln Street
Denver, Colorado  80203

Re:    Newmont Mining Corporation
       3,000,000 shares of
       Common Stock
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Sirs:

     We are  familiar  with the  proceedings  taken and  proposed to be taken by
Newmont  Mining  Corporation,   a  Delaware  corporation  (the  "Company"),   in
connection with the registration pursuant to the Registration  Statement on Form
S-8 (the "Registration  Statement") filed by the Company with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  of 3,000,000
shares of its Common  Stock,  $1.60 par value  (the  "Common  Stock"),  issuable
pursuant to the Company's 1996 Employees Stock Plan (the "Plan").

     We have examined such documents, certificates,  records, authorizations and
proceedings  and have made such  investigations  as we have deemed  necessary or
appropriate in order to give the opinion  expressed  herein. In such examination
we have assumed the  genuineness of all signatures and the  authenticity  of all
documents submitted to us as copies. In addition,  we have relied, to the extent
we deem such reliance  proper,  upon such  certificates of public  officials and
officers of the Company with respect to the accuracy of material factual matters
contained therein which were not independently established.

     Based on the  foregoing,  it is our opinion  that the  3,000,000  shares of
Common  Stock  referred to above have been duly  authorized  by the Company and,
when  issued  and,  in the case of shares to be issued  upon  exercise  of stock
options  granted under the Plan,  the option price therefor paid as described in
the Plan, will be validly issued,  fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common
Stock of the Company.

     We hereby  consent  to the  filing of this  opinion  as an  exhibit  to the
above-referenced Registration Statement.

                                   Very truly yours,


                                   /s/ White & Case LLP
                                   -------------------------------
                                   White & Case LLP
MSB:SE
### Test wells, Titaluk and Knifeblade areas, Alaska, with micropaleontologic study of test wells in the Titaluk and Knifeblade areas, northern Alaska

By: F. M. RobinsonH. R. Bergquist

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp305G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 99.7

                       GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
             OFFICERS' ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE - SERIES 2000-7

         The undersigned,  Vice Presidents of GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Series
2000-7 REMIC Multi-Class  Mortgage  Pass-Through  Certificates (the "Agreement")
entered into by GE Capital Mortgage Services,  Inc., as Seller and Servicer, and
State Street Bank and Trust Company,  as Trustee,  which  Agreement  requires an
annual  statement of  compliance  to be made to the Trustee by an officer of the
Servicer, hereby state that:

         (i)      a  review  of  the  activities  of  the  Servicer  during  the
                  preceding  calendar  year  and of its  performance  under  the
                  Agreement  has  been  made  under  the  undersigned  officers'
                  supervision; and

         (ii)     to the best of the undersigned  officers' knowledge,  based on
                  such review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its material
                  obligations  under the Agreement  throughout such year, except
                  as set forth on Exhibit A hereto.

Capitalized  terms used  herein but not  defined  herein  shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.

All questions relative to this certification  should be directed to Mary Kaplan,
Investor Relations at 856-661-6588.

Dated:            March 23, 2001

By:      /s/ Jacqui Maloney-Peace
---------------------------------
         Jacqui Maloney-Peace
         Senior Vice President

By:      /s/ Jeffrey W. Williams
--------------------------------
         Jeffrey W. Williams
         Vice President
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT A

                                      NONE
### §706. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 733, §16, 68 Stat. 727, which provided that nothing in this subchapter would affect any claim filed against the United States by any tribe before Aug. 13, 1954, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §4168. Public availability of information

Each recipient shall make any housing plan, policy, or annual report prepared by the recipient available to the general public.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title IV, §408, as added Pub. L. 105–276, title V, §595(e)(14)(A), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2658.)
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Gary C. Huber, the Chief Financial Officer of Canyon Resources Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September
         30, 2002, (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.










Date:  November 13, 2002                      /s/ Gary C. Huber
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Gary C. Huber
                                              Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
10.35




AMENDMENT
TO LICENSE AGREEMENT




AMENDMENT, DATED AS OF OCTOBER 11,
2010, TO LICENSE AGREEMENT, dated as of May 28, 2010 (“License Agreement”), made
by and between Li-ion Motors Corp., a Nevada corporation, with its principal
offices located at 4894 Lone Mountain Road, Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 (the
“Licensor”), and Lithium Electric Vehicle Corp., having an office in the city of
Calgary, in the Province of Alberta (the “Licensee”).  Capitalized
terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning
assigned to such term in the License Agreement.




WHEREAS, the Licensor and the Licensee
are parties to that certain License Agreement, dated May 28, 2010;




WHEREAS, the License Agreement does not
provide for a fixed term for the license rights granted under the License
Agreement; and




WHEREAS, the Licensor and the Licensee
have agreed to provide for a term of 10 years for the License Agreement;
and




WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms
and conditions of the License Agreement, the Licensor and the Licensee hereby
approve the amendment of the License Agreement as set forth herein.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as
follows:




2.
            By
      their respective execution of this Agreement, the Licensor and the
      Licensee agree that the term of the License Agreement shall be ten (10)
      years from the May 28, 2010 effective date of the License
      Agreement.




2.            By
their respective execution of this Agreement, the Licensor and the Licensee
agree that the License Agreement shall be amended by the addition of a new
Section 2.3 to read in its entirety as follows:




2.3           The
term of this Agreement shall be for a period of ten (10) years from the
effective date set forth above, subject to the provisions hereof providing for
earlier termination upon the occurrence of an event of default or otherwise as
provided herein.




3.            Except
as expressly provided herein, the License Agreement shall continue in full force
and effect.




LI-ION
      MOTORS CORP./s/
      Stacey FlingBy:Name:
      Stacey FlingTitle:
      President







LITHIUM
      ELECTRIC VEHICLE CORP./s/
      Rahim MohamedBy:Name:
      Rahim MohamedTitle:  President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

No. 17–1539

Mahaska County No. CVEQ087132

ORDER

IN RE THE DETENTION OF THOMAS G. RUTHERS JR. 

THOMAS G. RUTHERS JR., 

Respondent-Appellant.

The court, McDonald, J., taking no part, being evenly divided, declares this case 

affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2017). 

Waterman, Mansfield, and Christensen, JJ., would affirm the judgment of the 

district court; Cady, C.J., and Wiggins and Appel, JJ., would reverse the judgment of the 

district court. See State v. Effler, 769 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]hen the 

supreme court is equally divided on an issue upon which the district court and court of 

appeals differ, the decision of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.”). 

Copies to:

Michael H. Adams

Spd - Special Defense Unit

401 East Court Avenue, Suite 150

Des Moines, IA 50319

Tyler Buller

Assistant Attorney General

Hoover Building, 2nd Floor

Des Moines, IA 50319
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1660
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        9
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1669
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               75
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1669
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    76
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (26)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (26)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (26)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 10, 2015

NO. 03-15-00255-CV

Combined Financial Holdings Trust, Appellant

v.

The County of Bastrop, Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on March 25, 2015. Having 

reviewed the record, it appears to the Court that appellant has failed to prosecute its appeal by 

failing to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. Therefore, the Court dismisses 

the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both 

in this Court and the court below.
### §781. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 1, 1955, ch. 444, §2, 69 Stat. 431, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to complete allotment equalization payments and to distribute certain judgment funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3101.52 Action by the Bureau of Land Management. ( a ) Where the surface managing agency has consented to leasing with required stipulations, and the Secretary decides to issue a lease, the authorized officer will incorporate the stipulations into any lease which it may issue. The authorized officer may add other appropriate stipulations.
( b ) The authorized officer will not issue a lease on lands to which the surface managing agency objects or withholds consent and for which consent or concurrence is required by law.
( c ) The authorized officer will review all recommendations of the surface managing agency and will accept all reasonable recommendations.
( d ) Where the surface managing agency is the Fish and Wildlife Service, there will be no drilling or prospecting under any lease heretofore or hereafter issued on lands within a wildlife refuge, except with the consent and approval of the Secretary with the concurrence of the Fish and Wildlife Service as to the time, place and nature of such operations in order to give complete protection to wildlife populations and wildlife habitat on the areas leased, and all such operations must be conducted in accordance with BLM stipulations.