alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934




For the month of July 2003
Commission File Number 333-7182-01

                                   CEZ, a. s.
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                c/o Duhova 2/1444
                                 140 53 Prague 4
                                 Czech Republic
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                      Form 20-F  X       Form 40-F
                                ---                ---

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                              Yes       No X
                                  ---     ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

<PAGE>
The following information was filed by CEZ, a. s. in Czech language with the
Prague Stock Exchange as required by its rules and regulations:


Early Repayment of a Note to the National Property Fund
-------------------------------------------------------

As requested by the National Property Fund of the Czech Republic, CEZ, a. s.,
will pay, as of October 15, 2003, the remaining sum of money payable under an
agreement on the purchase of shares of REAS equal to CZK 3,735,000,000,
originally due in 2006.

<PAGE>
                                   Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                                   CEZ, a. s.
                                            ------------------------
                                                  (Registrant)

Date:  July 17, 2003

                                               /s/ Libuse Latalova
                                         By:------------------------
                                                 Libuse Latalova
                                         Head of Finance Administration
### §955. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 86–339, §5, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 604; Pub. L. 100–581, title II, §216, Nov. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2941, which related to tax exemptions for equalization allotments and cash payments received in lieu thereof, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 829.71

 829.08

 828.28

 828.02

 828.06

 827.99

 828.24

 828.46

 828.63

 828.79

 828.94

 829.04

 829.12

 829.22

 829.33

 829.39

 829.44

 829.70

 830.32

 831.08

 831.78

 832.44

 832.99

 833.49

 833.94

 834.40

 834.86

 835.29

 835.71

 36.89

 36.20

 35.34

 35.07

 35.11

 35.03

 35.30

 35.54

 35.72

 35.89

 36.05

 36.16

 36.25

 36.35

 36.47

 36.54

 36.59

 36.88

 37.56

 38.40

 39.19

 39.94

 40.57

 41.15

 41.67

 42.21

 42.76

 43.27

 43.77

STORAGE

-0.42

-0.68

-0.86

-0.28

+0.04

-0.07

+0.27

+0.24

+0.18

+0.17

+0.16

+0.11

+0.09

+0.11

+0.12

+0.07

+0.05

+0.28

+0.68

+0.84

+0.79

+0.75

+0.63

+0.58

+0.52

+0.54

+0.54

+0.51

+0.50

CHANGE

493

355

264

220

212

154

155

140

114

109

103

75

65

76

82

56

48

166

365

447

418

400

341

314

286

294

298

280

276

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 679

 679

 677

 338

 170

 170

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 4

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 3

 1

 3

 2

 1

 1

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 4

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .11

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .07

 .07

 .05

 .06

 .04

 .04

 .06

 .05

 .08

 .04

 .08

 .07

 .04

 .04

 .06

 .08

 .06

 .06

 .06

 .10

 .04

 .05

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .20

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2016 RUN DATE: 05/24/2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +6.46 6,606 2,713 580 54 1.58 .46

ACRE-FEET +6,460 13,103 5,381 1,150 107

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,150

OUTLET

TOTAL

 5,381

 6,531

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .46

JULY 1, 2015 12.60

 37.30

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,198.40

 1,198.32

 1,198.22

 1,198.32

 1,198.59

 1,198.74

 1,198.60

 1,198.43

 1,198.42

 1,198.43

 1,198.56

 1,198.65

 1,198.39

 1,198.48

 1,199.04

 1,199.52

 1,199.73

 1,199.68

 1,199.45

 1,198.85

 1,198.59

 1,199.21

 1,201.56

 1,202.37

 1,202.10

 1,201.34

 1,201.05

 1,200.32

 205.4

 205.2

 204.9

 205.2

 205.9

 206.4

 206.0

 205.5

 205.4

 205.5

 205.9

 206.1

 205.4

 205.6

 207.3

 208.7

 209.3

 209.2

 208.5

 206.7

 205.9

 207.8

 214.8

 217.3

 216.4

 214.1

 213.3

 211.1

STORAGE

-0.3

-0.2

-0.3

+0.3

+0.8

+0.4

-0.4

-0.5

+0.0

+0.0

+0.4

+0.3

-0.8

+0.3

+1.7

+1.4

+0.6

-0.1

-0.7

-1.8

-0.8

+1.8

+7.0

+2.5

-0.8

-2.3

-0.9

-2.2

CHANGE

154

172

136

434

685

830

429

308

268

308

475

416

583

647

2,162

1,738

1,173

813

605

491

489

1,956

5,334

3,089

1,570

1,693

1,741

1,387

INFLOW

 81

 81

 81

 81

 81

 407

 437

 352

 82

 89

 82

 82

 768

 313

 1,130

 820

 658

 688

 749

 1,188

 675

 832

 1,590

 1,653

 1,784

 2,650

 1,978

 2,286

PP

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 201

 201

 201

 201

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 201

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 199

 200

 200

 200

OUTLETS

 6

 8

 3

 3

 3

 0

 0

 9

 1

 4

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4

 4

C.F.S.

 .07

 .09

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .01

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .04

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2009 WHISKEYTOWN LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 21, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAP.

C.F.S. * FRANCIS

COMPUTED

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +5.4 30,086 5,604 0 21,698 45 .52

ACRE-FEET +5.4 59,676 11,116 0 43,038 89

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 43,038

SPILL 0 54,154

 205.7

OUTLET 11,116

TOTAL

JUDGE

CARR PP

(1)

 60

 80

 61

 301

 366

 59

 59

 60

 59

 59

 59

 138

 14

 14

 14

 14

 58

 91

 91

 92

 92

 87

 83

 91

 91

 684

 953

 676

 4,506

 8,938

FROM

TO

SPRING CR.

TO CLEAR CR.

CLEAR

CR.

NATURAL

FLOW

 94

 92

 75

 133

 319

 771

 370

 248

 209

 249

 416

 278

 569

 633

 2,148

 1,724

 1,115

 722

 514

 399

 397

 1,869

 5,251

 2,998

 1,479

 1,009

 788

 749

 25,618

 50,813

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.71

 .00

 .01

 .13

 .00

 1.19

 1.52

 .88

 .95

 2.80

 2.41

 1.02

 .72

 .02

 .00

 .00

 1.90

 2.05

 2.67

 .07

 .24

 .00

 .00

 20.29

PRECIP

INCHES

PRECIPITATION

 20.29

 35.45

THIS MONTH

JULY 1, 2008 TO DATE
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERREQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John Wille, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                 The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.                 The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Date: May 7, 2004                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                           |
|   | /s/ JOHN D. WILLE                              |   |
|   |                                           |
|   | John D. Wille**                                |
|   | *Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer* |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. and will be retained by RussBerrie and Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 23, 2009 

s1116 

Order 

 

November 23, 2009 

139382 & (35) 

JERAL A. PEOPLES, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139382 

 COA: 290762 

Wayne CC: 03-007347-01 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 7, 2009 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for the appointment 

of counsel is DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-20797

Summary Calendar

MAX LUCAS,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NOYPI, INCORPORATED; PIONEER CONTRACT SERVICES,

INCORPORATED; SUSAN SUSUSCO; ED FRITCHER,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CV-1940

Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Plaintiff-Appellant Max Lucas appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellants, rejecting all claims for

overtime wages. The district court determined that there were no genuine

issues of material fact to dispute the conclusion that, at all relevant times, the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 16, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

 Case: 12-20797 Document: 00512309421 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/16/2013
No. 12-20797

employment of Lucas and others similarly situated included work as “loaders”

of vehicles of sufficient size, engaged in interstate commerce, to come within

the exemption of the Motor Carriers Act to the overtime provisions of the Fair

Labor Standards Act, after the court first determined that DefendantsAppellants had sufficiently raised their exemption defense to avoid Lucas’s

claim that they had waived it.

Our review of the record on appeal, including the briefs of the parties

and the exhaustive opinion of the district court, satisfies us that the court

correctly rejected waiver, accurately analyzed the summary judgment record

in light of the applicable law, and thus properly dismissed Lucas’s action for

the reasons expressed in the court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order of

October 3, 2012. Consequently, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court

in all respects.

2

 Case: 12-20797 Document: 00512309421 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/16/2013
#### § 2710.0-2 Objective.

The objective is to provide for the orderly disposition at not less than fair market value of public lands identified for sale as part of the land use planning process.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-2362

MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

D. BISHOFF, Lieutenant; B. GAINER, Correctional Officer; CAPTAIN YEAGER; 

LT. YARBER, LIEUTENANT (acting SIA at time), 

Defendants - Appellees, 

and 

MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General, 

Defendant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:21-cv-00054-JPB-JPM) 

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 22, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Michael Antrantrino Lee, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2362 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Michael Antrantrino Lee seeks to appeal the district court’s order issued in his 

pending civil action denying his motion to appoint counsel. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan 

Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). The order Lee seeks to appeal is neither a final order 

nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction. We deny Lee’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2362 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
#### Celia Beitch, Respondent, v. Julius Beitch, Appellant.

Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
§ 3430.2-2 Additional time. ( a ) If the applicant has timely submitted some, but not all, of the information required by § 3430.2-1 of this title, the authorized officer shall request additional information and shall specify the information required.
( b ) The applicant shall submit any requested information within 60 days of the date of the request. The authorized officer may grant one 60-day extension if the applicant files a written request for an extension within the first 60-day period.
[44 FR 42628, July 19, 1979. Redesignated and amended at 47 FR 33143, July 30, 1982]
### §612. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts May 19, 1947, ch. 80, §2, 61 Stat. 102; Aug. 30, 1951, ch. 367, §1, 65 Stat. 208; Pub. L. 85–610, §1, Aug. 8, 1958, 72 Stat. 541, which related to the establishment of a trust fund for each tribe into which the Secretary of the Treasury was directed to transfer funds as necessary to effect the purpose of former section 611 of this title, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1     Officer's Certificate as to Compliance for the Washington
                 Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. Mortgage Pass-Through
                 Certificates, Series 2001-4 dated as of March 22, 2002

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

         The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.,
formerly PNC Mortgage Securities Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Company")
hereby certifies on behalf of the Company and on his own behalf for purposes of
the Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2001-4, as follows:

         1.    I am the duly appointed, qualified and acting Vice President of
               the Company.

         2.    Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the
               meanings ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing
               Agreement related to the above-referenced series of Certificates.

         3.    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's
               Certificate on behalf of the Company.

         4.    A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
               preceding calendar year and performance under this Agreement has
               been made under my supervision.

         5.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master
               Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
               throughout such year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 22, 2002.


                                    By:  /s/ Richie Moore
                                         ----------------------
                                         Richie Moore
                                         Vice President
STYLE v. RE: Case No. 15-0529 COA #: 12-13-00379-CV MARTHA N. HILL AND GARY WINNON EARL SWORD FILED INCOURTOFAPPEALS 12thCcftjrtofAppealsDistrict

TC#: HILL FILE COPY DATE: 7/21/2015 12-2467-C/B 

### Today the Supreme Court of Texas granted the 

### motion for extension of time to file petition for review under Tex. R. App. P. 53.7(f) in the above

### referenced case. The petition for review is due to be 

### filed no later than August 26, 2015. MS. CATHY S. LUSK CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS 1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 326

 315

 288

 258

 243

 224

 214

 210

 211

 198

 183

 175

 174

 180

 189

 199

 187

 191

 194

 196

 209

 210

 217

 229

 208

 204

 205

 205

 206

 212

 304

 282

 259

 240

 219

 206

 197

 191

 185

 179

 171

 164

 162

 157

 161

 164

 168

 171

 177

 185

 187

 185

 192

 191

 184

 185

 189

 187

 191

 188

 320

 300

 275

 250

 230

 215

 203

 198

 192

 186

 176

 169

 170

 170

 173

 179

 181

 185

 187

 191

 196

 202

 209

 216

 198

 195

 198

 198

 199

 198

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 283

 296

 298

 314

 309

 339

 327

 333

 442

 420

 397

 387

 325

 309

 374

 409

 502

 520

 531

 506

 532

 460

 379

 380

 363

 391

 361

 384

 346

 345

 249

 251

 254

 258

 259

 260

 264

 262

 264

 266

 266

 273

 274

 281

 291

 300

 307

 316

 318

 316

 320

 317

 314

 314

 317

 318

 322

 321

 320

 318

 256

 263

 262

 267

 272

 271

 276

 277

 280

 285

 277

 289

 282

 292

 309

 316

 334

 346

 345

 346

 352

 340

 329

 329

 326

 330

 329

 330

 331

 326

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 4, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### Standard Steam Specialty Company v. The Corn Exchange Bank.

Application granted. Order signed. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JARON AMBROSE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 370 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of November, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
378 P.2d 384

#### Harry D. SMITH, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 23 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Feb. 13, 1963.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the request for free process be and the same is hereby granted, and the petition for writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied for the reason that the facts alleged in the petition do not warrant the issuance of writ of mandamus.