alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3191.5-2 Indian lands withdrawn from delegation. ( a ) When an Indian tribe or allottee withdraws permission for a State to conduct inspection and related activities on its lands, the Indian tribe or allottee shall provide written notice of its withdrawal of permission to the State.
( b ) Immediately upon receipt of a notice of withdrawal of permission, the State shall provide written notification of said notice to the authorized officer, who immediately shall take all necessary action to provide for inspection and enforcement activities on the affected Indian lands.
( c ) No later than 120 days after receipt of a notice of withdrawal of permission draw from an Indian tribe or allottee, the delegation on the lands covered by the notice shall terminate.
( d ) Upon termination of a delegation covering Indian lands, appropriate changes in funding shall be made by the authorized officer.
#### § 2370.0-1 Purpose.

The regulations of this part 2370 apply to lands and interests in lands withdrawn or reserved from the public domain, except lands reserved or dedicated for national forest or national park purposes, which are no longer needed by the agency for which the lands are withdrawn or reserved.

[35 FR 9558, June 13, 1970]
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: January 6, 2017 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION 

Z811 JAN -q A tJ: 03 

DOCKET OPERATIONS ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2014-1116 

Pacific International Skydiving Center 

Case No. 2014WP130012 

Respondent 

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR POSTHEARING BRIEFS 

The undersigned judge conducted a hearing in the above captioned case from December 13 

to 15, 2016. At the conclusion of the hearing, both parties requested permission to submit 

posthearing briefs once the transcript was received. 

On January 5, 2017, the undersigned judge received the hearing transcript. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.205(a)(6) and 13.231(c), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. Each party shall submit a posthearing brief no later than February 6, 2017. 1 

2. Each party's posthearing brief shall not exceed 15 pages in length. 

DOUGLAS 

:7?~-- M. RAW ALD 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 

1 See 14 C.F.R. § 13.231(c) (allowing no more than 30 days following receipt of the transcript for parties to prepare 

and submit post hearing briefs). Thirty days from the date of receipt of the transcript would be Saturday, February 4, 

2017. The parties therefore have until the next business day, February 6, 2017, to file their briefs. 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0002 

ONE COPY 

Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel 

8900 SW 1 07th A venue, Suite 203 

Miami, FL 33176 

TEL: 305-598-4841 

FAX: 305-598-4842 

Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, A WP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Western-Pacific Region 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-3454 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-1116 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

2 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
(No. 74-CC-426

#### Nyle Lee Dyer, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 11, 1974.*

Nyle Lee Dyer, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*340Per Curiam.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21914]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-957-04-1420-BJ]


Survey Plat Filings; Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of survey, Wyoming.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has filed the plats of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM Wyoming State Office, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming, on September 24, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These surveys were executed at the request 
of the Bureau of Land Management and are necessary for the management 
of resources. The lands surveyed are:
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of the 
Fourteenth Standard Parallel North, through Range 74 West, the south 
boundary and the subdivisional lines, Township 56 North, Range 74 West, 
Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, was accepted September 24, 2004.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of the 
east and north boundaries, and the subdivisional lines, Township 55 
North, Range 75 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, was accepted 
September 24, 2004.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of the 
Fourteenth Standard Parallel North, through Range 75 West, the east 
boundary and the subdivisional lines, Township 56 North, Range 75 West, 
Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, was accepted September 24, 2004.
    Copies of the preceding described plats and field notes are 
available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page.

    Dated: September 24, 2004.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.
[FR Doc. 04-21914 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 768

 790

 785

 768

 818

 811

 830

 906

 898

 948

 977

 985

 977

 970

 970

 992

 1,008

 1,016

 1,016

 984

 940

 919

 927

 928

 929

 945

 973

 989

 1,018

 733

 772

 755

 749

 764

 761

 758

 823

 874

 885

 947

 971

 964

 956

 960

 975

 977

 981

 981

 943

 884

 903

 919

 917

 920

 931

 950

 956

 989

 756

 783

 768

 761

 805

 781

 793

 867

 885

 918

 962

 976

 972

 962

 964

 985

 1,000

 1,001

 995

 962

 905

 911

 924

 922

 925

 940

 964

 978

 1,009

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 2720.0-2 Objectives.

The objective is to allow consolidation of surface and subsurface or mineral ownership where there are no known mineral values or in those instances where the reservation interferes with or precludes appropriate non-mineral development and such development is a more beneficial use of the land than the mineral development.
**Exhibit 32.1**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**
     In connection with the Annual Report of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the quarter ending December 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Michael J. McMennamin, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:
          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany. /s/ Michael J. McMennamin Michael J. McMennamin(chief executive officer)March 30, 2004
#### Jacob J. Weller et al., Respondents, *v.*Thompson Hersee, Appellant.

(Argued June 5, 1878;

decided June 18, 1878.)

*E. C. Sprague*for appellant.

*J. M. Humphrey*for respondents.

Agree to affirm. No opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MICHAEL DUANE RABIEH, Defendant - Appellant. No. 16-6317 (D.C. Nos. 5:16-CV-00423-C and 5:07-CR-00058-C-2) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGEMENT *

Before PHILLIPS , McKAY , McHUGH , Circuit Judges.
Michael Rabieh pled gu ilty to knowingly and in tentionally distributing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Th e district court applied the career-offender enhancement under U.S. Senten cing Guidelines § 4B1.1, and sentenced Mr. Rabieh to 151 months’ imprisonment. Seve ral years later, Mr. Rabieh filed a pro se motion for federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on Johnson v. United
States , 135 S. Ct. 2251 (2015), which held that the residual clause of the Armed Career

* After examining the briefs a nd appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not ma terially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34. 1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order is not bi nding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral es toppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and 10th Circuit Rule 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### June 21, 2017
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court- 2 - Criminal Act was uncons titutionally vague, and United States v. Madrid , 805 F.3d 1204 (10th Cir. 2015), which applied Johnson to the residual clause for the career-offender sentencing enhancement, as define d in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2). The district court denied the § 2255 motion because th e plea agreement contained a collateral-attack waiver. Subsequently, th e district court granted a certificate of appealability on whether enfor cement of the waiver would constitute a miscarriage of justice under United States v. Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004). However, after the certificate was granted, the Suprem e Court issued its opinion in Beckles v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 886 (2017). Beckles held that the Sentencing Guidelines, including the residual clause of § 4B1.2(a)(2), are not su sceptible to vagueness challenges under the Due Process Clause. Thus, we need not address whether th e plea waiver precludes this collateral attack because Mr. Rabieh’s § 2255 motion lacks merit in light of Beckles

. AFFIRMED

. Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1432 CA 11-00947 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, GREEN, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

JOSEPH LAWRENCE SHERIDAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

MICHAEL GUINDY, INDIVIDUALLY, AND M&C OF USA, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

MORGAN LAW FIRM, P.C., SYRACUSE (WILLIAM R. MORGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
MACKENZIE HUGHES LLP, SYRACUSE (W. BRADLEY HUNT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered June 25, 2010. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment and granted the cross motion of defendants for partial summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the**


**Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002**





I,
      Stephen Brock, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
      Public Company Management Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Public Company Management
      Corporation.





Date:
      December 28, 2007




By:
              /s/
                  Stephen BrockStephen
                  Brock,Chief
                  Executive Officer




I,
      Trae
      O'Neil High, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Public
      Company Management Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Public Company Management
      Corporation.





Date:
      December 28, 2007





By:
            /s/
                Trae O'Neil HighTrae
                O'Neil HighChief
                Financial Officer
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 189 / Thursday, September 30, 2004 / Presidential Documents 58793

Presidential Determination No. 2004–52 of September 24, 2004

Certification Permitting Rescission of Iraq as a Sponsor of 

Terrorism 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

On September 13, 1990, Acting Secretary of State Eagleburger designated 

Iraq as a state sponsor of terrorism (55 Fed. Reg. 37793–01). 

Consistent with section 6(j)(4)(A) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, 

Public Law 96–72, as amended, and as continued in effect by Executive 

Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 66 Fed. Reg. 44025, I hereby certify that: 

(1) There has been a fundamental change in the leadership and policies of the Government of Iraq; 

(2) Iraq’s government is not supporting acts of international terrorism; 

and 

(3) Iraq’s government has provided assurances that it will not support 

acts of international terrorism in the future.

Accordingly, the prerequisites for your determination to rescind Iraq’s designation as a state sponsor of terrorism will be satisfied once you have 

transmitted this certification to the Congress. 

This certification shall also satisfy the provisions of section 620A(c)(1) of 

the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, Public Law 87–195, as amended, and 

section 40(f)(1)(A) of the Arms Export Control Act, Public Law 90–629, 

as amended. 

You are authorized and directed to report this certification to the Congress 

and to arrange for its publication in the 

W

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 24, 2004. 

[FR Doc. 04–22102

Filed 9–29–04; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P
§ 3261.15 Must I give BLM my drilling permit application, drilling program, and operations plan at the same time? You may submit your completed and signed drilling permit application and complete drilling program and operations plan either together or separately. ( a ) If you submit them together and we approve your drilling permit, the approved drilling permit will authorize both the pad construction and the drilling and testing of the well.
( b ) If you submit the operations plan separately from the drilling permit application and program, you must: ( 1 ) Submit the operations plan before the drilling permit application and drilling program to allow BLM time to comply with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); and
( 2 ) Submit a completed and signed Sundry Notice for well pad and access road construction. Do not begin construction until we approve your Sundry Notice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          60,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,473
<INVENTORY>                                     50,025
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               219,814
<PP&E>                                          47,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 279,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,793
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,467
<OTHER-SE>                                     252,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   279,294
<SALES>                                         62,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,071
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,388
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,471
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (259)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,212
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        

</TABLE>
### §1165. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–117, §5, Oct. 31, 1967, 81 Stat. 338, which exempted funds distributed or held in trust under the provisions of this subchapter from Federal and State income taxes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**Exhibit23.0**

** **

****

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

 

Wehereby consent to the inclusion of our Independent Auditor’s Report datedJanuary 6, 2004 regarding the consolidated balance sheets of Coast Bancorp andSubsidiary as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidatedstatements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for theyears ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, in the Form 10-KSB filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.

 
|                     | /s/ Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP |   |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP     |
|                     |                                    |
| Laguna Hills, California |                                    |
| March 22, 2004           |                                    |

 

 

25231 Paseo De Alicia, Suite 100   Laguna Hills, CA  92653    Tel: 949.768.0833    Fax: 949.768.8408    www.vtdcpa.com

 

**FRESNO ****• LAGUNA HILLS ****•  PLEASANTON ****•  RANCHO CUCAMONGA ****•  SAN JOSE**

 

----
### §1780j. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 109–286, §12, Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1225, which related to the conveyance of the Northern Tier Land, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CLIVENS GOLDMAN and ANDREA GOLDMAN,

Appellants,

v.

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee for JP 

MORGAN MORTGAGE TRUST 2007-A6, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, Without Recourse,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1906

[December 20, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Joseph Marx, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CA-006285-

XXXX-MB.

Clivens Goldman and Andrea Goldman, Wellington, pro se.

Jan Timothy Williams of Lapin & Leichtling, LLP, Winter Park, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
(No. 820

Claimant awarded $792.00.)

#### George Temple & Arthur R. Temple, Partners, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1925.*

*Sales*— when *State liable.*The State is liable to refund the purchase of hogs sold by it to claimant when the animals are infected with contagious and infectious disease.

Iungerich *&*Chapman, for claimant.

• Oscar E.- Carlstrom, Attorney General; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for a loss arising out of a purchase of hogs from the University of Illinois by the claimants.

It appears that the defendant maintains and operates a department of animal husbandry as a part of Agricultural Experiment Station in connection with the University of Illinois, situated in Urbana, in Champaign County.

It appears that said institution carried on experiment matters and kept hogs for experimental purposes or otherwise.

It is claimed that a.lot of twenty-five hogs were sold to the claimants by the authorities of such university, paying therefor $160.00; that claimants afterwards purchased eighty-one hogs, paying therefor $792.00; that this latter lot.of hogs were infected with “flu,” a contagious and infectious disease of swine.

It is further alleged that agents at such university knew of the diseased condition of the hogs.

The defendant appears and objects to the allowance of this claim.

■ The claimant also claims damages on account of loss of other hogs, feed, etc.

The court is of the opinion that to go beyond the question of eighty-one hogs sold, that, would get into the realm of speculative damages.

*95However, from all the evidence, the court is of the opinion that the hogs were not well, that is, the bunch of eighty-one last sold to claimants were sick and should not have been sold. Therefore, the court recommends an allowance of the sum of $792.00, which is an allowance on account of the eighty-one ' hogs last sold.
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Detail

# Changes to the Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program Under the Agricultural Act of 2014: Their Potential Risk Reduction Impacts

Economic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-172) 31 pp, May 2017

by Ashley  Hungerford, Gregory  Astill, and Anne  Effland

ERS examines impacts of the Buy-Up coverage addition to the Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP) on expected payments, producers' risk reduction, and NAP enrollment by type of producer and crops.

**Keywords:** specialty crops, risk management, NAP, Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program, Agricultural Act of 2014, Federal crop insurance (FCI)

**In this publication...**

-  Entire Report 
-  Download Zip file for EIB-172 
-  Report summary 

-  Crops 
-  Corn 
-  Fruit & Tree Nuts 
-  Vegetables & Pulses 
-  Beginning & Disadvantaged Farmers 
-  Farm & Commodity Policy 
-  Risk Management 

-  County-level Data Sets 
-  Data Visualizations 

**Last updated:** Thursday, May 25, 2017

**For more information contact:**Ashley  Hungerford, Gregory  Astill, and Anne  Effland