alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 297

 295

 289

 299

 329

 351

 331

 359

 338

 337

 345

 312

 338

 355

 360

 319

 317

 319

 365

 372

 327

 329

 323

 341

 345

 335

 413

 474

 526

 247

 253

 254

 255

 265

 270

 279

 281

 285

 285

 288

 292

 293

 283

 281

 274

 270

 265

 263

 266

 273

 285

 293

 293

 292

 302

 299

 298

 311

 263

 261

 263

 268

 279

 286

 288

 294

 299

 300

 308

 298

 302

 301

 297

 288

 283

 279

 278

 285

 288

 299

 303

 307

 307

 317

 327

 336

 371

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 10, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
### §3305. Allocation of grant funds

#### (a) Allocation of funds

#### (1) In general

The Secretary shall continue to determine the amount of program funds to be received by each grantee under this subchapter by the same method used for determining such distribution in fiscal year 1991 for tribally-administered and Bureau-administered programs of grants to individual Indians to defray postsecondary expenses.

#### (2) Administrative costs

In addition to the amount determined under paragraph (1), a grantee which has exercised the option given in section 3304(a) of this title to administer the program under a grant shall receive an amount for administrative costs determined pursuant to the method used by the grantee during the preceding contract period. All other grantees shall receive an amount for administrative costs determined pursuant to the regulations governing such determinations under the Indian Self Determination and Education Assistance Act [25 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.], as in effect at the time of application to grants being made.

#### (3) Single grant; separate accounts

Each grantee shall receive only one grant during any fiscal year, which shall include both of the amounts under paragraphs (1) and (2). Each grantee shall maintain this grant in a separate account.

#### (b) Use of funds

Funds provided by grants under this subchapter shall be used—

(1) to make grants to individual Indian students to meet, on the basis of need, any educational expense of attendance in a postsecondary education program (as determined under the contracts applying to the postsecondary education program administered by tribes under the Indian Self Determination and Education Assistance Act (Public Law 93–638) [25 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.]), to the extent that such expense is not met from other sources or cannot be defrayed through the action of any State, Federal, or municipal Act, except that nothing in this subsection shall be interpreted as requiring any priority in consideration of resources; and

(2) costs of administering the program under this subchapter, except that no more may be spent on administration of such program than is generated by the method for administrative cost computation specified in subsection (a)(2).

(Pub. L. 102–325, title XIII, §1315, July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 800.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, referred to in subsecs. (a)(2) and (b)(1), is Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, which is classified principally to chapter 46 (§5301 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 18, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“Act”), the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors' National Association (SMACNA) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors' National Association (SMACNA), Chantilly, VA. The nature and scope of SMACNA's standards development activities are to promulgate industry standards to the general public and to initiate, promote and document studies directed toward the solution of present and future problems in the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) industry and all facets of the sheet metal industry.

Additional information concerning SMACNA may be obtained from Sue Baker at (703) 803-2980.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-22161  Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### Clean	Power	Plan **Goal	Computation Call	with	the	State	of	Colorado**  **07 /**  **10 /2014**  **D iscussion	Questions** 

Colorado contacted EPA Region 8 expressing frustration that they cannot find the information on Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) turbines located within the state that EPA mentioned could be found on the EIA 923 forms. They have 37 units and none of the data matches the information th ey have on the units. An additional question involves combined heat and power units. EGUs have expressed concern to Colorado about t heir ability to meet their name plate capacity when a plant generates steam and feeds that steam to a second unit to produce power. The Clean Power Plan does not seem to make allowances for combined cycle units loss of capacity. Is this true? Does the Plan also take into account that these plants should be de
- rated because they are located at altitude rat her than at sea level?
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     GOPHER, INC.  June 30, 1998  financial  statements and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000894536
<NAME>                        GOPHER, INC.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998

<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 101

 105

 110

 111

 112

 114

 120

 129

 139

 141

 157

 177

 177

 174

 193

 215

 227

 240

 249

 274

 278

 294

 293

 248

 279

 314

 320

 364

 366

 257

 99

 102

 105

 110

 110

 112

 112

 120

 127

 139

 139

 159

 171

 170

 173

 198

 206

 226

 242

 246

 270

 275

 225

 224

 250

 279

 314

 319

 237

 237

 100

 103

 106

 110

 111

 113

 116

 124

 133

 140

 145

 168

 174

 172

 179

 207

 221

 231

 246

 258

 275

 284

 261

 234

 269

 298

 317

 338

 296

 246

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 11, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 4,788

 4,668

 4,544

 4,407

 4,275

 4,163

 4,068

 3,980

 3,917

 3,860

 3,815

 3,801

 3,792

 3,775

 3,769

 3,789

 3,829

 3,923

 4,053

 4,204

 4,369

 4,524

 4,670

 4,811

 4,988

 5,184

 5,395

 5,632

 5,829

 5,975

 160

 156

 151

 147

 143

 139

 136

 133

 131

 129

 127

 127

 126

 126

 126

 126

 128

 131

 135

 140

 146

 151

 156

 160

 166

 173

 180

 188

 194

 199

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
National UAS Solutions, LLC. 104 Raphael Drive Lafay ette, LA 70508 September 2, 2015 Exemption Number 11570 Regulatory

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0347
U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey

Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

**Re: Request to amend Exemption No. 11570 to allow National UAS Solutions, LLC to add the SenseFly eXom, the SenseFly eBee, the SenseFly swinglet CAM, the PrecisionHawk Lancaster,**  **and the R**  **oboflight RF70 sUAS platforms**  **under the same directions and limitations as provided within Exemption**  **No. 11570, docket Number FAA**
**- 2015** 
**- 0347, approved on May 13. 2015.** 
Dear Sir or Madam, National UAS Solutions, LLC was issued an exemption under Secti on 333 of the “FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012” numbered 11570 for the purpose of gathering aerial data using small Unmanned Aerial Sy stems. Since the exemption was granted, National UAS Solutions, LLC has determined the need to add the SenseFl y eXom, the SenseFl y eBee, the SenseFl y swinglet CAM , the PrecisionHawk Lancaster and the Roboflight RF70 sUAS’s to our exemption to meet our expanding customer base needs to remain competitive and enhance services afforded our customers. All of these small UAS’s have been approved in other exemptions, all weigh under 55 pounds and all have forward speeds of 50 knots or less. They will all operate with an altitude restriction of 400 feet or less. Further, the sUAS’s will be operated in acc ordance with the limitations and restrictions enumerated in Exemption No. 11570 alread y granted National UAS Solutions, LLC. Because the requested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise any novel issue, and because the addition of these sUAS platforms to our fleet will not materially affect our already granted petition No. 11570 in any

way , and because National UAS Solutions, LL C seeks to begin operations immediately , National UAS Solutions, LLC respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to dispense withpublication of the summary of this petition in the Federal Register and grant the requested ammendment expeditiously

b y summary means. Thank you for your kind consideration in the granting of this amendment.
Best r egards,

Charles R. O’Neal, Jr. President/CEO National UAS Solutions, LLC Lafayette, LA 70508 (337) 288

- 1793 coneal@nationaluassolutions.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 573

 606

 607

 640

 623

 613

 596

 551

 582

 609

 608

 574

 582

 668

 684

 629

 445

 353

 334

 347

 355

 344

 340

 353

 363

 363

 371

 382

 387

 412

 538

 536

 511

 564

 507

 444

 475

 485

 490

 531

 560

 534

 561

 534

 613

 448

 343

 336

 320

 324

 346

 307

 307

 341

 350

 347

 358

 366

 374

 383

 563

 577

 558

 583

 539

 500

 510

 511

 546

 577

 592

 560

 570

 590

 658

 575

 409

 343

 327

 332

 350

 333

 317

 345

 358

 354

 367

 373

 379

 390

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005 (the Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael R. McDonnell, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    MICHAEL R.
MCDONNELLName:

Michael R. McDonnellDate:

April 28, 2006
#### § 2931.9 Information collection.

The information collection requirements in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned clearance number 1004-0119. BLM will use the information to determine whether we should grant permits to applicants for Special Recreation Permits on public lands. You must respond to requests for information to obtain a benefit.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4496 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4496

  To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 to modify the 
authorization of appropriations for the Las Vegas Wash program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 23, 2022

 Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself and Ms. Rosen) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 to modify the 
authorization of appropriations for the Las Vegas Wash program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Las Vegas Wash Program Extension 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM.

    Section 529(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2658; 119 Stat. 2255; 125 Stat. 865) is amended by striking 
``$30,000,000'' and inserting ``$55,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNumerical Analysis of Convection/Transpiration CoolingAn innovative concept utilizing the natural porosity of refractory-composite materials and hydrogen coolant to provide CONvective and TRANspiration (CONTRAN) cooling and oxidation protection has been numerically studied for surfaces exposed to a high heat flux, high temperature environment such as hypersonic vehicle engine combustor walls. A boundary layer code and a porous media finite difference code were utilized to analyze the effect of convection and transpiration cooling on surface heat flux and temperature. The boundary, layer code determined that transpiration flow is able to provide blocking of the surface heat flux only if it is above a minimum level due to heat addition from combustion of the hydrogen transpirant. The porous media analysis indicated that cooling of the surface is attained with coolant flow rates that are in the same range as those required for blocking, indicating that a coupled analysis would be beneficial.Document ID20000012950Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGlass, David E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Dilley, Arthur D.*(FDC/NYMA, Inc. Hampton, VA United States)*Kelly, H. Neale*(Analytical Services and Materials, Inc. Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1999Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberL-17915NAS 1.15:209828NASA/TM-1999-209828Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: F33657-93-C-2227PROJECT: RTOP 242-33-03-20Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000012950.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Ricky Birge, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-235;

Fifth District

June 11, 1974.

Robert E. Farrell and Howard B. Augustus, both of the State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Mt. Vernon, for appellant.

Robert H. Rice, State’s Attorney, of Belleville (Philip G. Feder, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE CREBS

delivered the opinion of the court:

On a negotiated plea of guilty in the Circuit Court of St. Clair County defendant was convicted of burglary. He was first sentenced to a 2-year term of periodic imprisonment in the St. Clair county jail with the pro*174vision that he would be released during school hours to continue his education in a vocational training school. When he failed to return to the jail on the first day that he was released for this purpose he had to be apprehended on a court order. His periodic imprisonment was then revoked and he was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than 3 nor more than 7 years.

It is from this sentence that defendant appeals, contending that the sentence was excessive and that the minimum term should be reduced to 1 year, or, in the alternative, to 2 years and 4 months in compliance with the Unified Code of Corrections. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 1005— 8 — 1(c)(3).

Burglary is a Class 2 felony and for this offense the Unified Code provides that “the minimum term shall be one year unless the court, having regard to the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and character of the defendant, sets a higher minimum term, which shall not be greater than one-third of the maximum * ***

 Because the minimum sentence imposed did exceed one-third of the maximum, contrary to the express provisions of the Code, defendant’s sentence is set aside and the cause is remanded with directions to re-sentence in compliance with the Unified Code of Corrections.

 Accordingly, the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Clan County revoking probation is affirmed, the sentence set aside, and the cause remanded with' directions to impose a new sentence.

G. MORAN, P. J., and CARTER, J., concur.