alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3171.21 Subsequent operations and Sundry Notices. Subsequent operations must follow 43 CFR part 3160, applicable lease stipulations, and APD Conditions of Approval. The operator must file the Sundry Notice in the BLM Field Office having jurisdiction over the lands described in the notice or the operator may file it using the BLM's electronic commerce system. ( a ) *Surface disturbing operations.* ( 1 ) Lessees and operators must submit for BLM or FS approval a request on Form 3160-5 before: ( i ) Undertaking any subsequent new construction outside the approved area of operations; or
( ii ) Reconstructing or altering existing facilities including, but not limited to, roads, emergency pits, firewalls, flowlines, or other production facilities on any lease that will result in additional surface disturbance.
( 2 ) If, at the time the original APD was filed, the lessee or operator elected to defer submitting information under § 3171.8(e)(4)(iii), the lessee or operator must supply this information before construction and installation of the facilities. The BLM, in consultation with any other involved surface managing agency, may require a field inspection before approving the proposal. The lessee or operator may not begin construction until the BLM approves the proposed plan in writing.
( 3 ) The operator must certify on Form 3160-5 that they have made a good faith effort to provide a copy of any proposal involving new surface disturbance to the private surface owner in the case of split estate.
( b ) *Emergency repairs.* Lessees or operators may undertake emergency repairs without prior approval if they promptly notify the BLM. Lessees or operators must submit sufficient information to the BLM or the FS to permit a proper evaluation of any: ( 1 ) Resulting surface disturbing activities; or
( 2 ) Planned accommodations necessary to mitigate potential adverse environmental effects.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 823

 839

 902

 949

 964

 994

 1,004

 1,024

 1,050

 1,068

 1,051

 1,018

 869

 633

 370

 261

 225

 214

 236

 250

 265

 269

 262

 258

 255

 253

 262

 276

 0

 787

 804

 828

 877

 944

 969

 989

 922

 1,026

 1,047

 1,022

 855

 578

 370

 258

 215

 204

 199

 217

 236

 252

 262

 247

 242

 247

 224

 227

 262

 0

 804

 820

 862

 908

 957

 984

 997

 991

 1,038

 1,062

 1,036

 970

 729

 546

 295

 245

 216

 204

 229

 244

 259

 266

 252

 250

 251

 236

 243

 270

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 23, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 22,848

 22,828

 22,866

 22,940

 23,060

 23,209

 23,372

 23,525

 23,722

 23,935

 24,164

 24,322

 24,231

 23,978

 23,499

 22,975

 22,444

 21,948

 21,442

 20,937

 20,447

 19,956

 19,518

 19,157

 18,833

 18,467

 18,027

 17,644

 16,930

 762

 761

 762

 765

 769

 774

 779

 784

 791

 798

 805

 811

 808

 799

 783

 766

 748

 732

 715

 698

 682

 665

 651

 639

 628

 616

 601

 588

 564

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEvaluation of Full Reynolds Stress Turbulence Models in FUN3DFull seven-equation Reynolds stress turbulence models are a relatively new and promising tool for todays aerospace technology challenges. This paper uses two stress-omega full Reynolds stress models to evaluate challenging flows including shock-wave boundary layer interactions, separation and mixing layers. The Wilcox and the SSGLRR full second-moment Reynolds stress models are evaluated for four problems: a transonic two-dimensional diffuser, a supersonic axisymmetric compression corner, a compressible planar shear layer, and a subsonic axisymmetric jet. Simulation results are compared with experimental data and results using the more commonly used Spalart-Allmaras (SA) one-equation and the Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST) two-equation models.Document ID20170009385Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDudek, Julianne C.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Carlson, Jan-Renee*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 3, 2017Publication DateSeptember 1, 2017Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN39118AIAA Paper 2017-0541E-19343NASA/TM-2017-219468Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA Science and Technology (SciTech) Forum 2017Location: Grapevine, TXCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 9, 2017End Date: January 13, 2017Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Keywordscomputational fluid dynamicsreynolds averagingmixing layersAvailable DownloadsNameType20170009385.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
MEMORANDUM

TO: Portland Cement NSPS Docket

FROM: Keith Barnett, USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

DATE: September 25, 2009

SUBJECT: September 24, 2009 Meeting between U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) and Sierra Club in Ariel Rios North, Washington D.C.

Introduction and Objectives

Representatives from Sierra Club requested a meeting with Gina McCarthy, Assistant 

Administrator for Air and Radiation, to discuss the schedule for completing the review of 

the Portland Cement NSPS.

Meeting Summary

Several representatives from the Sierra Club and Reed Zars (their counsel-by phone) met 

with Gina McCarthy, the Associate Administrator for Air And Radiation to discuss Sierra 

Club concerns on the NSPS schedule and potential greenhouse gas regulations. Also 

attending from EPA (among others) were Peter Tsirigotis and Keith Barnett.
2

ATTACHMENT 1 – MEETING ATTENDEES

EPA – PCA

March 19, 2009

Attendees Affiliation

Steve Silverman EPA

Keith Barnett EPA, by phone

Steve Fruh EPA, by phone

Elineth Torres EPA, by phone

Andy O’Hare Portland Cement Association (PCA)

David Novello Novello Law

Other individual cement company representatives.
Exhibit
10.17


 


TERMINATION
AGREEMENT


 


THIS
TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of March 31, 2021 (the “Effective Date”),
by and among American Physicians LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Sponsor”), and Edoc Acquisition Corp.,
a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Sponsor entered into that certain Administrative Support Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2020 (the “Administrative
Support Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the parties hereto desire to, effective immediately as of the date first written above, terminate the Administrative Services Agreement
as more specifically provided herein.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


 


1. Termination. The parties hereto hereby acknowledge and agree that, effective as of the Effective Date, the Administrative Services
Agreement and all obligations of the Company and the Sponsor pursuant thereto will be terminated in all respects.


 


2. Release and Waiver. Effective as of the Effective Date, each of the parties hereto mutually release and discharge each other from
all claims or demands under or in connection with the Administrative Support Agreement. Sponsor hereby waives its right to receive any
fees pursuant to such agreement that may have been payable from November 9, 2020 to the date hereof.


 


3. Further Assurances. Each of the parties hereto hereby further covenants and agrees to execute and deliver all further documents
and agreements and take all further action that may be reasonably necessary or desirable in order to enforce and effectively implement
the terms and conditions of this Agreement.


 


4. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement is intended to bind, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and
their respective successors and assigns.


 


5. Counterparts; Governing Law. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts (including by means of facsimile or other
electronic transmission), each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument. This
Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to conflict of laws provisions.


 


6. Headings. The headings of the sections, paragraphs and subsections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall
not affect the interpretation hereof.


 


*      *      *      *      *


 




     


     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed and delivered this Agreement effective as of the Effective Date.


 


	 	EDOC ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Kevin Chen
	 	Name: 	Kevin Chen
	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	AMERICAN PHYSICIANS LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Xiaoping Becky Zhang
	 	Name:  	Xiaoping Becky Zhang
	 	Title: 	Managing Member



 


[Signature Page to Administrative Support
Agreement Termination]
#### § 3191.5 Delegation for Indian lands.
#### Henry Schilling, Respondent, *v.*The Boston and Albany Railroad Company, Appellant.

(Argued September 25, 1878;

decided October 4, 1878.)

*John Cadman*for appellant.

*H. W. McClellan*for respondent.

Agree to affirm. No opinion.

All concur, except Miller and Earl, JJ., absent.

Judgment affirmed.
#### § 2652.0-3 Authority.

Sections 12 (a)(1) and (c)(3) provide for selections by regional corporations; and sections 14 (e), (f), (h), (1), (2), (3), (5), and (8), provide for the conveyance to regional corporations of the selected surface and subsurface estates, as appropriate.
Banco de Galicia y Buenos Aires S.A.

                                                Buenos Aires, January 21ST, 2010

Comision Nacional de Valores (National Securities Commission)

                               Ref.: Program for the issuance and re-issuance of
                               Ordinary Negotiable Obligations for up to
                               US$2,000,000,000 - Cancellation.

Dear Sirs,

In my capacity as attorney in fact for Banco de Galicia y Buenos Aires Sociedad
Anonima (the "Bank"), I am writing in order to inform you that the Bank decided
to repay the Negotiable Obligations detailed below and cancel the public
offering thereof. Such Negotiable Obligations had been acquired at a price of
80,550478%, being the economic result of the operation pesos 1,5 million
(utility):

* Negotiable Obligations due in 2014: for a face value of US$ 23,121,000 (twenty
three million, one hundred and twenty one thousand US Dollars).

Having made this repayment, the principal amount of the outstanding Negotiable
Obligations due in 2014 now has a face value of US$ 161,843,781 (one hundred and
sixty one million, eight hundred forty three thousand and seven hundred and
eighty one US Dollars).

Consequently, we request that you give effect to the partial cancellation of the
Public Offering for US$ 23,121,000 of Negotiable Obligations due in 2014.

Yours faithfully,


Patricia Lastiry
Attorney in fact
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            2032
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2042
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               90
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2042
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    87
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (98)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (98)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (98)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.13)
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSubsonic Investigation of Leading-Edge Flaps Designed for Vortex- and Attached-Flow on a High-Speed Civil Transport ConfigurationA wind tunnel investigation of two separate leading-edge flaps, designed for vortex and attached-flow, respectively, were conducted on a High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT) configuration in the Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. Data were obtained over a Mach number range of 0.12 to 0.27, with corresponding chord Reynolds numbers of 2.50 x 10 (sup 6) to 5.50 x 10 (sup 6). Variations of the leading-edge flap deflection angle were tested with outboard leading-edge flaps deflected 0 deg. and 26.4 deg. Trailing-edge flaps were deflected 0 deg., 10 deg., 12.9 deg., and 20 deg. The longitudinal and lateral aerodynamic data are presented without analysis. A complete tabulated data listing is also presented herein. The data associated with each deflected leading-edge flap indicate L/D improvements over the undeflected configuration. These improvements may be instrumental in providing the necessary lift augmentation required by an actual HSCT during the climb-out and landing phases of the flight envelope. However, further tests will have to be done to assess their full potential.Document ID20000021583Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCampbell, Bryan A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Kemmerly, Guy T.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Kjerstad, Kevin J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Lessard, Victor R.*(Vigyan Research Associates, Inc. Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1999Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209701L-17919NASA/TM-1999-209701Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 537-03-22-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000021583.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 19.2 Definitions. As used in this subpart the term: ( a ) *National Forest Wilderness* means an area or part of an area of national forest lands designated by the Wilderness Act or by a subsequent act of Congress as a wilderness area.
( b ) *National Park System* means all federally owned or controlled areas administered by the Secretary through the National Park Service.
( c ) *National Wilderness Preservation System* means the Federally owned areas designated by the Wilderness Act or subsequent acts of Congress as wilderness areas.
( d ) *National Wildlife Refuge System* means those lands and waters administered by the Secretary as wildlife refuges, wildlife ranges, game ranges, wildlife management areas, and waterfowl production areas established under any statute, proclamation, executive order, or public land order.
( e ) *Roadless area* means a reasonably compact area of undeveloped Federal land which possesses the general characteristics of a wilderness and within which there is no improved road that is suitable for public travel by means of four-wheeled, motorized vehicles intended primarily for highway use.
( f ) *Roadless island* means a roadless area that is surrounded by permanent waters or that is markedly distinguished from surrounding lands by topographical or ecological features such as precipices, canyons, thickets, or swamps.
( g ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of the Interior or an official of the Department of the Interior who exercises authority delegated by the Secretary of the Interior.
( h ) *Wilderness* means a wilderness as defined in section 2(c) of the Wilderness Act.
§ 3162.3-2 Subsequent well operations. ( a ) A proposal for further well operations shall be submitted by the operator on Form 3160-5 for approval by the authorized officer prior to commencing operations to redrill, deepen, perform casing repairs, plug-back, alter casing, recomplete in a different interval, perform water shut off, commingling production between intervals and/or conversion to injection. If there is additional surface disturbance, the proposal shall include a surface use plan of operations. A subsequent report on these operations also will be filed on Form 3160-5. The authorized officer may prescribe that each proposal contain all or a portion of the information set forth in § 3162.3-1 of this title.
( b ) Unless additional surface disturbance is involved and if the operations conform to the standard of prudent operating practice, prior approval is not required for routine fracturing or acidizing jobs, or recompletion in the same interval; however, a subsequent report on these operations must be filed on Form 3160-5.
( c ) No prior approval or a subsequent report is required for well cleanout work, routine well maintenance, or bottom hole pressure surveys.
( d ) For details on how to apply for approval of a facility measurement point; approval for surface or subsurface commingling from different leases, unit participating areas and communitized areas; or approval for off-lease measurement, see 43 CFR 3173.12, 3173.15, and 3173.23, respectively.
[47 FR 47765, Oct. 27, 1982. Redesignated and amended at 48 FR 36583, Aug. 12, 1983, further amended at 52 FR 5391, Feb. 20, 1987; 53 FR 17363, May 16, 1988; 53 FR 22847, June 17, 1988; 80 FR 16218, Mar. 26, 2015; 81 FR 81419, Nov. 17, 2016; 82 FR 61949, Dec. 29, 2017]
#### John S. Williams, Appellant, v. Otto Giebelhausen and Others, Respondents.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, • Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §488a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 488a was editorially reclassified as section 5137 of this title.
### §1773c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–41, §5, June 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 86, which related to standards to be applied by the Secretary of the Interior in accepting additional lands in trust, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Configuration of the bedrock surface of the District of 
Columbia and vicinity

#### Professional Paper 217

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**     
                             (html)
- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp217 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:16
#### § 2.64 Must you submit an appeal before seeking judicial review?

Before seeking review by a court of the bureau's adverse determination, you generally must first submit a timely administrative appeal.