alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 684.640 What grievance systems must an Indian and Native American program grantee provide?

INA program grantees must establish grievance procedures consistent with the requirements of WIOA sec. 181(c) and § 683.600 of this chapter.
§ 3420.4-2 Consultation with surface management agencies. ( a ) The Secretary, for any proposed lease tract containing lands the surface of which is under the jurisdiction of any agency other than the Department, shall request that the agency: ( 1 ) Consent, if it has not already done so, to the issuance of the lease (43 CFR 3400.3-1), and
( 2 ) if it consents, prescribe the terms and conditions the Secretary will impose in any lease which the head of the agency requires for the use and protection of the nonmineral interests in those lands.
( b ) The Secretary may prescribe additional terms and conditions that are consistent with the terms proposed by the surface management agency to protect the interest of the United States and to safeguard the public welfare.
[44 FR 42615, July 19, 1979. Redesignated at 47 FR 33139, July 30, 1982]
#### § 2812.0-3 Authority.

Sections 303 and 310 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1732, 1733, and 1740), and the Act of August 28, 1937 (43 U.S.C. 1181a and 1181b), provide for the conservation and management of the Oregon and California Railroad lands and the Coos Bay Wagon Road lands and authorize the Secretary of the Interior to issue regulations providing for the use, occupancy, and development of the public lands through permits and rights-of-way.

[54 FR 25855, June 20, 1989]
#### § 703.117 Report; by whom sent.

The report of issuance of a policy and endorsement provided for in § 703.116 or notice of cancellation provided for in § 703.114 must be sent by the home office of the carrier, except that any carrier may authorize its agency or agencies in any compensation district to make such reports, provided the carrier notifies DLHWC of the agencies so duly authorized.

[80 FR 12933, Mar. 12, 2015]
#### § 3279.11 How may I appeal a BLM decision regarding my utilization operations?

You may appeal our decision affecting your utilization operations in accordance with § 3200.5.
(No. 847

Claimant awarded $1790.93.)

#### Pauline Dohn Rudolph, Executrix of the Estate of Franklin Rudolph, Deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1925.*

Inheritance *tax*— when *claimant entitled to refund.*Where an inheritance tax has been assessed and paid under protest, and upon appeal and hearing thereon, and the tax is re-assessed and a lesser amount is found to be due the State, claimant is entitled to a refund' of the difference between the amount of the tax paid under the original order of the court and the amount found to be due upon appeal.

Miller, Gorham, Wales & Noxon, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant, Pauline Dohn Rudolph, is executrix of the last will and testament of Franklin Rudolph, late of Cook County, deceased. On June 27, 1923, an order was entered by the county judge, of said county fixing the total tax due the State from said estate at the sum of $51,981.73, less *5%*statutory deduction — $2599.08—or a net total of $39,724.62. Claimant thereupon appealed from said order of the county judge of the county court, from the order appraising the taxable share of claimant individually at said sum.

On June 28, 1923, claimant!, under protest, paid the said net sum, being the total tax assessed against all the legatees. The Union Trust Company also appealed from an order assessing a tax of $10,032.98 against the interest of the Union Trust Company as trustee for the will of Franklin Rudolph, deceased, to-wit: Pauline Dohn Rudolph, Frank Dohn Rudolph and Charles Dohn Rudolph, under certain trusts exe*102cuted by decedent in Ms lifetime, which the State of Illinois claimed were gifts in contemplation of death, etc. These appeals were perfected July 17,1923, and heard in court July 29,1924; and thereupon the court entered an order re-appraising the total tax due the State at $39,930.21, minus *5%*discount of $1996.51, or a net tax of $37,933.70, showing that claimant had thus overpaid tax to the amount of $1790.93, and the judge entered an order that she was entitled to a refund of said sum.

The Attorney General, after examining the evidence submitted by claimant, says that she was entitled to the amount claimed as refund. The court finds that the evidence on file supports claimant’s declaration and claim, and accordingly mitted by claimant, says that she was entitled to the amount awards claimant the sum of $1,790.93.
#### § 3107.51 Extension after discovery on other segregated portions.

Any lease segregated by assignment, including the retained portion, will continue in effect for the primary term of the original lease, or for 2 years after the date a well capable of production in paying quantities is established upon any other portion of the original lease, whichever is the longer period.
### GENERAL PROVISIONS
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 291 253 262

2 277 254 259

3 269 257 262

4 275 264 266

5 279 264 268

6 273 262 266

7 275 262 265

8 269 249 262

9 272 259 264

10 267 250 259

11 261 249 255

12 260 245 251

13 255 237 245

14 255 234 244

15 266 237 246

16 272 236 245

17 273 233 243

18 271 230 240

19 282 229 242

20 299 229 247

21 283 228 241

22 272 225 236

23 249 223 230

24 257 222 230

25 263 222 231

26 266 223 231

27 276 226 234

28 270 222 235

29 276 228 237

30 287 232 240

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Victoria Canal On The Middle River

Period: November 2023 Run Date: 12/8/2023
### §5635. Appraisals and valuations

#### (a) In general

Notwithstanding section 5634 of this title, not later than 18 months after June 22, 2016, the Secretary, in consultation with Indian tribes and tribal organizations, shall ensure that appraisals and valuations of Indian trust property are administered by a single bureau, agency, or other administrative entity within the Department.

#### (b) Minimum qualifications

Not later than 1 year after June 22, 2016, the Secretary shall establish and publish in the Federal Register minimum qualifications for individuals to prepare appraisals and valuations of Indian trust property.

#### (c) Secretarial approval

In any case in which an Indian tribe or Indian beneficiary submits to the Secretary an appraisal or valuation that satisfies the minimum qualifications described in subsection (b), and that submission acknowledges the intent of the Indian tribe or beneficiary to have the appraisal or valuation considered under this section, the appraisal or valuation—

(1) shall not require any additional review or approval by the Secretary; and

(2) shall be considered to be final for purposes of effectuating the transaction for which the appraisal or valuation is required.

(Pub. L. 114–178, title III, §305, June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 441.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 528

 606

 652

 664

 680

 631

 542

 510

 495

 603

 701

 799

 834

 917

 984

 1,041

 1,074

 1,118

 1,143

 1,102

 1,055

 1,090

 1,104

 1,078

 1,088

 1,002

 1,009

 946

 926

 928

 956

 467

 530

 606

 639

 628

 476

 472

 440

 440

 498

 608

 714

 793

 835

 919

 985

 1,030

 1,069

 1,074

 1,059

 1,012

 1,034

 1,059

 1,051

 968

 959

 933

 895

 894

 894

 858

 499

 569

 634

 653

 659

 562

 508

 480

 466

 550

 656

 758

 813

 865

 951

 1,011

 1,053

 1,094

 1,113

 1,085

 1,032

 1,063

 1,085

 1,065

 1,019

 982

 977

 924

 910

 909

 902

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 9, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 21,218

 21,017

 20,823

 20,646

 20,449

 20,126

 19,721

 19,287

 18,840

 18,483

 18,197

 18,030

 17,967

 18,051

 18,300

 18,641

 19,028

 19,465

 19,927

 20,349

 20,691

 21,064

 21,428

 21,873

 22,380

 22,948

 23,506

 24,014

 24,492

 24,945

 25,348

 707

 701

 694

 688

 682

 671

 657

 643

 628

 616

 607

 601

 599

 602

 610

 621

 634

 649

 664

 678

 690

 702

 714

 729

 746

 765

 784

 800

 816

 832

 845

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### § 3177.4 Definitions.

As used in this subpart, the term:

*Authorized officer* means any employee of the Bureau of Land Management authorized to perform duties described in 43 CFR parts 3000 and 3100.

*Federal lands* means all lands and interests in lands owned by the United States which are subject to the mineral leasing laws, including mineral resources or mineral estates reserved to the United States in the conveyance of a surface or nonmineral estate.

*Free-board* means the vertical distance from the top of the fluid surface to the lowest point on the top of the dike surrounding the pit.

*Injection well* means a well used for the disposal of produced water or for enhanced recovery operations.

*Lease* means any contract, profit share arrangement, joint venture, or other agreement issued or approved by the United States under a mineral leasing law that authorized exploration for, extraction of, or removal of oil or gas (see 43 CFR 3160.0-5).

*Lessee* means a person or entity holding record title in a lease issued by the United States (see 43 CFR 3160.0-5).

*Lined pit* means an excavated and/or bermed area that is required to be lined with natural or manmade material that will prevent seepage. Such pit shall also include a leak detection system.

*Major violation* means noncompliance that causes or threatens immediate, substantial, and adverse impacts on public health and safety, the environment, production accountability, or royalty income (see 43 CFR 3160.0-5).

*Minor violation* means noncompliance that does not rise to the level of a “major violation” (see 43 CFR 3160.0-5).

*Natural Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)* means a program administered by the Environmental Protection Agency or primacy State that requires permits for the discharge of pollutants from any point source into navigable waters of the United States.

*Operator* means any person or entity, including but not limited to the lessee or operating rights owner, who has stated in writing to the authorized officer that it is responsible under the terms and conditions of the lease for the operations conducted on the leased lands or a portion thereof (see 43 CFR 3610.0-5).

*Produced water* means water produced in conjunction with oil and gas production.

*Toxic constituents* means substances in produced water that when found in toxic concentrations specified by Federal or State regulations have harmful effects in plant or animal life. These substances include but are not limited to arsenic (As), barium (Ba), cadmium (Cd), hexavalent chromium (hCr), total chromium (tCr), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), zinc (Zn), selenium (Se), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes, as defined in 40 CFR part 261.

*Underground Injection Control (UIC) program* means a program by administered by the EPA, primacy State, or Indian Tribe under the Safe Drinking Water Act to ensure that subsurface injection does not endanger underground sources of drinking water.

*Unlined pit* means an excavated and/or bermed area that is not required to be lined, or any pit that is lined but does not contain a leak detection system.
§ 668.100 What is the purpose of the programs established to serve Native American peoples (INA programs) under section 166 of the Workforce Investment Act? ( a ) The purpose of WIA INA programs is to support comprehensive employment and training activities for Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian individuals in order to: ( 1 ) Develop more fully their academic, occupational, and literacy skills;
( 2 ) Make them more competitive in the workforce;
( 3 ) Promote the economic and social development of Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian communities according to the goals and values of such communities; and
( 4 ) Help them achieve personal and economic self-sufficiency.
( b ) The principal means of accomplishing these purposes is to enable tribes and Native American organizations to provide employment and training services to Native American peoples and their communities. Services should be provided in a culturally appropriate manner, consistent with the principles of Indian self-determination. (WIA sec. 166(a)(1).)
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of  NEXHORIZON  COMMUNICATIONS,  INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Daniel M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 15, 2008



By:       /s/ Daniel M. Smith
         -----------------------------
         Daniel M. Smith
         Chief Financial Officer
#### Peter V. Carroll et al., Respondents, *v.*Frederick Waydell et al., Appellants.

(Argued June 7, 1878;

decided June 18, 1878.)

*Spencer Clinton*for appellants.

*E. C. Sprague*for respondents.

Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur, except Folger, J., not voting.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005 (the Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael R. McDonnell, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    MICHAEL R.
MCDONNELLName:

Michael R. McDonnellDate:

February 28, 2006
§ 2568.82 If BLM decides that I have not submitted enough information to show qualifying use and occupancy, will it reject my application or give me a chance to submit more information? ( a ) BLM will not reject your application without giving you an opportunity for a hearing to establish the facts of your use.
( b ) If BLM cannot determine from the information you submit that you met the use and occupancy requirements of the 1906 Act, it will send you a notice saying that you have not submitted enough evidence and will give you at least 60 days to file additional information.
( c ) If you do not submit additional evidence by the end of the time BLM gives you or if you submit additional evidence but BLM still cannot determine that you meet the use and occupancy requirements, the following process will occur: ( 1 ) BLM will issue a formal contest complaint telling you why it believes it should reject your application.
( 2 ) If you answer the complaint and tell BLM you want a hearing, BLM will ask an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the Interior Department, Office of Hearings and Appeals, to preside over a hearing to establish the facts of your use and occupancy.
( 3 ) The ALJ will evaluate all the written evidence and oral testimony and issue a decision.
( 4 ) You can appeal this decision to the Interior Board of Land Appeals according to 43 CFR part 4.
In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-24-00230-CR

__________________

ALBERT WENDELL SELLS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. F19-33290-0

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 28, 2024, Albert Wendell Sells filed a notice of appeal from a 

sentence pronounced on August 4, 2022, in Trial Cause Number F19-33290-0. This 

is the second time Sells filed a notice of appeal regarding this case. On February 1, 

2023, we dismissed Sells’ appeal because the notice of appeal had not been timely 

filed. See Sells v. State, No. 09-22-00408-CR, 2023 WL 1431166, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Beaumont Feb. 1, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). 
When a defendant appeals from a conviction in a criminal case, the time to 

file a notice of appeal runs from the date sentence is imposed or suspended in open 

court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). The notice of appeal must be filed “within 90 

days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court if the defendant 

timely files a motion for new trial.” Id. 26.2(a)(2). Sells filed a notice of appeal on

June 28, 2024, more than 90 days after the date the trial court imposed the sentence.

On July 3, 2024, the Clerk of the Court notified the parties that the appeal 

would be dismissed unless a party established that the notice of appeal was timely 

filed. No party filed a response. Furthermore, the Court has received nothing from 

the Court of Criminal Appeals stating that the Court of Criminal Appeals has granted 

an out-of-time appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on July 30, 2024

Opinion Delivered July 31, 2024

Do Not Publish

Before Johnson, Wright and Chambers, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C.
§ 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of RF Industries, Ltd. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James Doss, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      June 8, 2010
              /s/ James DossJames
      DossChief
      Financial Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOptimal Pitch Thrust-Vector Angle and Benefits for all Flight RegimesThe NASA Dryden Flight Research Center is exploring the optimum thrust-vector angle on aircraft. Simple aerodynamic performance models for various phases of aircraft flight are developed and optimization equations and algorithms are presented in this report. Results of optimal angles of thrust vectors and associated benefits for various flight regimes of aircraft (takeoff, climb, cruise, descent, final approach, and landing) are given. Results for a typical wide-body transport aircraft are also given. The benefits accruable for this class of aircraft are small, but the technique can be applied to other conventionally configured aircraft. The lower L/D aerodynamic characteristics of fighters generally would produce larger benefits than those produced for transport aircraft.Document ID20000034897Acquisition SourceArmstrong Flight Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGilyard, Glenn B.*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Bolonkin, Alexander*(National Academy of Sciences Edwards, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 2000Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberH-2402NAS 1.15:209021NASA/TM-2000-209021Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-16-14Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000034897.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §3714b. Printing

(a) Sections 501 through 517 and 1101 through 1123 of title 44 shall not apply to direct purchase by the Commission for its use of printing, binding, and blank-book work in the Republic of Panama when the Commission determines that such direct purchase is in the best interest of the Government.

(b) This section shall not affect the Commission's authority, under chapter 5 of title 44, to operate a field printing plant.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1306, as added Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXV, §3540, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2866; amended Pub. L. 105–85, div. C, title XXXV, §3549, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 2073.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1997—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–85 substituted "Sections 501 through 517 and 1101 through 1123" for "Section 501".