alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 2546.1 Offers of lands for sale.

Before any lands may be sold under the Act, the authorized officer of the Bureau of Land Management shall publish in the Federal Register and in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the State of Idaho a notice that the lands will be offered for sale, which notice shall specify a period of time not less than 30 days in duration during which citizens may file with the proper office at Boise, Idaho, a notice of their intention to apply to purchase all or part of the lands as qualified preference-right claimants.
#### § 3472.1-1 Qualified applicants and bidders.

A lease may be issued only to (a) citizens of the United States; (b) associations of citizens organized under the laws of the United States or of any state thereof, which are authorized to hold such interests by the statute under which they are organized and by the instrument establishing their association; (c) corporations organized under the laws of the United States or of any state thereof, including a company or corporation operating a common carrier railroad; and (d) public bodies, including municipalities.

[44 FR 42643, July 19, 1979. Redesignated at 44 FR 56340, Oct. 1, 1979]
### §7553. Donor contributions to Afghanistan and reports

#### (a) Findings

The Congress finds that inadequate amounts of international assistance promised by donor states at the Tokyo donors conference and elsewhere have been delivered to Afghanistan, imperiling the rebuilding and development of civil society and infrastructure, and endangering peace and security in that war-torn country.

#### (b) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that the United States should use all appropriate diplomatic means to encourage all states that have pledged assistance to Afghanistan to deliver as soon as possible the total amount of assistance pledged.

#### (c) Reports

#### (1) In general

The Secretary of State shall submit reports to the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on International Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, in accordance with this paragraph, on the status of contributions of assistance from donor states to Afghanistan. The first report shall be submitted not later than 60 days after December 4, 2002, the second report shall be submitted 90 days thereafter, and subsequent reports shall be submitted every 180 days thereafter through December 31, 2004.

#### (2) Further requirements

Each report, which shall be unclassified and posted upon the Department of State's Internet website, shall include, by donor country, the total amount pledged, the amount delivered within the previous 60 days, the total amount of assistance delivered, the type of assistance and type of projects supported by the assistance.

(Pub. L. 107–327, title III, §303, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2812.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on International Relations of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Foreign Affairs of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007.
§ 3275.11 What are a facility operator's obligations? You must: ( a ) Keep the facility in proper operating condition at all times by; ( 1 ) Conducting training during your operation to ensure that your personnel are capable of performing emergency procedures quickly and effectively;
( 2 ) Using properly maintained equipment; and
( 3 ) Using operational practices that allow for quick and effective emergency response.
( b ) Base the design of the utilization facility siting and operation on sound engineering principles and other pertinent geologic and engineering data;
( c ) Prevent waste of, or damage to, geothermal and other energy and minerals resources; and
( d ) Comply with the requirements of § 3200.4.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCorrelation of EBIC and SWBXT Imaged Defects and Epilayer Growth Pits in 6H-SiC Schottky DiodesWe show the first direct experimental correlation between the presence of closed core screw dislocations in 6H-SiC epilayers with recombination centers, as well as with some of the small growth pits on the epilayer surface in lightly-doped 6H-SiC Schottky diodes. At every Synchrotron White-Beam X-ray Topography (SWBXT)-identified closed core screw dislocation, an Electron Beam Induced Current (EBIC) image showed a dark spot indicating a recombination center, and Nomarski optical microscope and Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) images showed a corresponding small growth pit with a sharp apex on the surface of the epilayer.Document ID20000023159Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsSchnable, C. M.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Tabib-Azar, M.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Neudeck, P. G.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Bailey, S. G.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Su, H. B.*(State Univ. of New York Stony Brook, NY United States)*Dudley, M.*(State Univ. of New York Stony Brook, NY United States)*Raffaelle, R. P.*(Rochester Inst. of Tech. NY United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 2000Subject CategorySolid-State PhysicsReport/Patent NumberE-11996NAS 1.15:209648NASA/TM-2000-209648Meeting InformationMeeting: 1999 International Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related MaterialsLocation: Raleigh, NCCountry: United StatesStart Date: October 10, 1999End Date: October 15, 1999Sponsors:North Carolina State Univ.Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC3-593OTHER: DARPA Order-E111PROJECT: RTOP 505-23-2QCONTRACT_GRANT: DAAG55-98-10392Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000023159.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Elsie Woebse, Respondent, v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Appellant.

No opinion. Present— Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
### §7. Fees for furnishing certified copies of records

The Commissioner of Indian Affairs shall have the custody of said seal, and shall furnish certified copies of any such records, books, maps, or papers belonging to or on the files of said office, to any person applying therefor who shall comply with the requirements of said office, upon the payment by such parties at the rate of 10 cents per hundred words, and $1 for copies of maps or plats, and the additional sum of 25 cents for the Commissioner's certificate of verification, with the seal of said office; and one of the employees of said office shall be designated by the Commissioner as the receiving clerk, and the amounts so received shall, under the direction of the Commissioner, be paid into the Treasury of the United States; but fees shall not be demanded for such authenticated copies as may be required by the officers of any branch of the Government or by any Indian who shall satisfy the Commissioner by satisfactory legal evidence that he or she is not able, by reason of poverty, to pay such fees, nor for such unverified copies as the Commissioner in his discretion may deem proper to furnish.

(July 26, 1892, ch. 256, §4, 27 Stat. 273; Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §229(b), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 208.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–310 struck out provisions which required the receiving clerk to give a bond in the sum of $1,000.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Exhibit 31.2 Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries Certification Of Chief Financial Officer PURSUANT TO RULE 13a  14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Reed L. Benson, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Broadcast International, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c.      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants  internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date: November 13, 2007  /s/ Reed L. Benson Reed L. Benson Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 09-3071 September Term, 2013

 FILED ON: MAY 6, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

APPELLEE

v.

JARON BRICE, ALSO KNOWN AS JAY BIRD, ALSO KNOWN AS DADDY, ALSO KNOWN AS BIRD, ALSO

KNOWN AS JAY,

APPELLANT

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia

(No. 1:05-cr-00367-1)

Before: KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge, and WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judges

UNDER SEAL OPINION NOT

AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             416
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1429
<ALLOWANCES>                                       121
<INVENTORY>                                        868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3333
<PP&E>                                            7512
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1567
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          1532
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        4283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7382
<SALES>                                           5243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5663
<CGS>                                             4800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   669
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2790)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2790)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2790)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6389

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JINKINS HOPKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CR-99-341, CA-01-4177-3-19)

Submitted: July 30, 2002 Decided: August 22, 2002

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jinkins Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant United

States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jinkins Hopkins seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). He raises a

claim under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), asserting

that his sentence on three charges arising out of a marijuana

conspiracy violates the statutory maximum set forth in 21 U.S.C. §

841(b)(4) (2000). The decision in Apprendi issued prior to Hopkins'

conviction, and he did not object to his sentence in light of

Apprendi. Accordingly, this claim is procedurally barred. See

Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614, 622 (1998); United States

v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 145 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, U.S.

, 122 S. Ct. 573 (2001). Thus, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 3171.1 Authority. ( a ) The Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture have authority under various Federal and Indian mineral leasing laws, as defined in 30 U.S.C. 1702, to manage oil and gas operations. The Secretary of the Interior has delegated this authority to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which has issued onshore oil and gas operating regulations codified at 43 CFR part 3160. For leases on Indian lands, the delegation to the BLM appears at 25 CFR parts 211, 212, 213, 225, and 227.
( b ) The Secretary of Agriculture has authority under the Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (Pub. L. 100-203) (Reform Act) to regulate surface disturbing activities conducted pursuant to a Federal oil and gas lease on National Forest Service (NFS) lands. This authority has been delegated to the Forest Service (FS). Its regulatory authority is at 36 CFR chapter II, including, but not limited to, part 228, subpart E, part 251, subpart B, and part 261. The FS is responsible only for approving and regulating surface disturbing activities on NFS lands and appeals related to FS decisions or approvals.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chester Enrique ROMERO-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40759.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*195PER CURIAM: *

Chester Enrique Romero-Ortiz appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien found in the United States after deportation subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction. The district court sentenced Romero-Ortiz to 33 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. To the extent that Romero-Ortiz’s challenge to the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is construed as a challenge to his conviction, it is not precluded by the terms of the plea agreement.

Romero-Ortiz’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United, States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Romero-Ortiz contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Romero-Ortiz properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Order entered July 31, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00362-CV

TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC., Appellant

V.

SIDNEY WICKS, AS TRUSTEE OF THE 

SIDNEY WICKS REVOCABLE TRUST, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-15435

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s July 18, 2013 opposed second motion for an extension of time 

to file a brief. Appellant shall file its brief on or before August 22, 2013. We caution appellant 

that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 5

                         LETTERHEAD OF WHITE & CASE LLP

March 7, 2003

Chesapeake Funding LLC
307 International Circle
Hunt Valley, MD 21030

Dear Sirs:

     We have examined the Registration Statement on Forms S-3 and S-1 (the
"Registration Statement" filed by Chesapeake Funding LLC (the "Company") and
D.L. Peterson Trust with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Act of 1933, for the registration of $500,000,000 principal amount of
the Company's Series 2003-1 Floating Rate Callable Asset Backed Notes (the
"Notes"), to be issued pursuant to the Base Indenture dated as of June 30, 1999,
as supplemented by Supplemental Indenture No. 1 thereto, dated as of October 28,
1999 (such Base Indenture as so supplemented, the "Indenture") between the
Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank)
(the "Trustee") and a Series 2003-1 Indenture Supplement to be entered into
between the Company and the Trustee (the "Indenture Supplement").

     In our opinion, when the Notes have been duly executed, authenticated and
delivered against payment therefor and the Indenture Supplement, under which the
Notes are to be issued, has been executed and delivered, the Notes will be
validly issued and binding obligations of the Company and will be entitled to
the benefits provided by the Indenture and the Indenture Supplement, in each
case except as the enforceability thereof may be limited by bankruptcy,
insolvency or similar laws affecting the enforcement of the rights of creditors
generally and by general principles of equity (regardless of whether enforcement
is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law).

     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Registration Statement.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    /s/ White & Case LLP
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA
- Directorate Identifier: 2011
- NE
- 03
- AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA,**  **etc)?** (You might need to submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “ **Ex Parte Contacts** .”) ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE Hartzell Engine Technologies, LLC Ju dd Hough 12/23/2010 Concur.

Other/Additional Information:
#### § 3486.4 Appeals.

Decisions or orders issued by the BLM under part 3480 of this title may be appealed pursuant to part 4 of this title.

[48 FR 41593, Sept. 16, 1983]
# Službeni list C 217A/1. s

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 217A |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 63.1. srpnja 2020. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 217A

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 63.1. srpnja 2020.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | Ispravci |
| 2020/C 217 A/01 | Ispravak Poziva na iskaz interesa – Revizori u područjima i. matematike i statistike; ii. znanosti o podatcima, digitalne revizije, analize podataka i mreža, rudarenja podataka i teksta, automatiziranja procesa i rudarenja procesa – Privremeno osoblje (razredi AD 5–AD 9) ( SL C 185 A, 4.6.2020. ) | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

Ispravci

2020/C 217 A/01

Ispravak Poziva na iskaz interesa – Revizori u područjima i. matematike i statistike; ii. znanosti o podatcima, digitalne revizije, analize podataka i mreža, rudarenja podataka i teksta, automatiziranja procesa i rudarenja procesa – Privremeno osoblje (razredi AD 5–AD 9) ( SL C 185 A, 4.6.2020. )

( SL C 185 A, 4.6.2020. )

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Ispravci

| 1.7.2020 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CA 217/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2020

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CA 217/1

---

Ispravak Poziva na iskaz interesa – Revizori u područjima i. matematike i statistike; ii. znanosti o podatcima, digitalne revizije, analize podataka i mreža, rudarenja podataka i teksta, automatiziranja procesa i rudarenja procesa – Privremeno osoblje (razredi AD 5–AD 9)

(
  Službeni list Europske unije C 185 A od 4. lipnja 2020.
  )

(2020/C 217 A/01)

Na stranici 4.:

umjesto:

„Rok za podnošenje prijava je 2. srpnja 2020. do 12 sati (po srednjoeuropskom vremenu).”;

treba stajati:

treba stajati:

„Rok za podnošenje prijava je 15. rujna 2020. do 12 sati (po srednjoeuropskom vremenu).”

---