alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 59269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Biodiesel Accreditation Commission 
(``NBAC'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 27, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Biodiesel 
Accreditation Commission (``NBAC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization is National 
Biodiesel Accreditation Commission, Jefferson City, MO. The nature and 
scope of the NBAC's standards development activities are the 
administration of a certification program for both the manufacturers 
and marketers of biodiesel, both neat and blended. Certification by the 
NBAC indicates the applicant possesses and implements a quality 
assurance/quality control program meeting the Commission's 
requirements.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-22153 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §1680q. Prescription drug monitoring

#### (a) Monitoring

#### (1) Establishment

The Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of the Interior and the Attorney General, shall establish a prescription drug monitoring program, to be carried out at health care facilities of the Service, tribal health care facilities, and urban Indian health care facilities.

#### (2) Report

Not later than 18 months after March 23, 2010, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report that describes—

(A) the needs of the Service, tribal health care facilities, and urban Indian health care facilities with respect to the prescription drug monitoring program under paragraph (1);

(B) the planned development of that program, including any relevant statutory or administrative limitations; and

(C) the means by which the program could be carried out in coordination with any State prescription drug monitoring program.

#### (b) Abuse

#### (1) In general

The Attorney General, in conjunction with the Secretary and the Secretary of the Interior, shall conduct—

(A) an assessment of the capacity of, and support required by, relevant Federal and tribal agencies—

(i) to carry out data collection and analysis regarding incidents of prescription drug abuse in Indian communities; and

(ii) to exchange among those agencies and Indian health programs information relating to prescription drug abuse in Indian communities, including statutory and administrative requirements and limitations relating to that abuse; and

(B) training for Indian health care providers, tribal leaders, law enforcement officers, and school officials regarding awareness and prevention of prescription drug abuse and strategies for improving agency responses to addressing prescription drug abuse in Indian communities.

#### (2) Report

Not later than 18 months after March 23, 2010, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report that describes—

(A) the capacity of Federal and tribal agencies to carry out data collection and analysis and information exchanges as described in paragraph (1)(A);

(B) the training conducted pursuant to paragraph (1)(B);

(C) infrastructure enhancements required to carry out the activities described in paragraph (1), if any; and

(D) any statutory or administrative barriers to carrying out those activities.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title VIII, §827, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10221(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 827 of Pub. L. 94–437 is based on section 196 of title I of S. 1790, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, as reported by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate in Dec. 2009, which was enacted into law by section 10221(a) of Pub. L. 111–148.
### §1300d–4. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–555, title II, §202, Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1169; Pub. L. 105–387, §7(d)(1), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3474, which related to apportionment of funds on the basis of reservation or other residence, distribution of per capita shares to enrolled members, and use of remaining funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 18.600 Semi-annual compilation. ( a ) The head of each agency shall collect and compile the disclosure reports (see appendix B to this part) and, on May 31 and November 30 of each year, submit to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives a report containing a compilation of the information contained in the disclosure reports received during the six-month period ending on March 31 or September 30, respectively, of that year.
( b ) The report, including the compilation, shall be available for public inspection 30 days after receipt of the report by the Secretary and the Clerk.
( c ) Information that involves intelligence matters shall be reported only to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( d ) Information that is classified under Executive Order 12356 or any successor order shall be reported only to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives (whichever such committees have jurisdiction of matters involving such information) and to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( e ) The first semi-annual compilation shall be submitted on May 31, 1990, and shall contain a compilation of the disclosure reports received from December 23, 1989 to March 31, 1990.
( f ) Major agencies, designated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), are required to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives no later than with the compilations due on May 31, 1991. OMB shall provide detailed specifications in a memorandum to these agencies.
( g ) Non-major agencies are requested to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives.
( h ) Agencies shall keep the originals of all disclosure reports in the official files of the agency.
### PART V—CARRYOVERS

Sec.
381.
Carryovers in certain corporate acquisitions.
382.
Limitation on net operating loss carryforwards and certain built-in losses following ownership change.
383.
Special limitations on certain excess credits, etc.
384.
Limitation on use of preacquisition losses to offset built-in gains.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §10226(b), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–415, added item 384.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title VI, §621(c)(2), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2266, substituted "Limitation on net operating loss carryforwards and certain built-in losses following ownership change" for "Special limitations on net operating loss carryovers" in item 382 and "Special limitations on certain excess credits, etc." for "Special limitations on unused business credits, research credits, foreign taxes, and capital losses" in item 383.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §474(r)(12)(C), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 842, substituted "unused business credits, research credits, foreign taxes, and capital losses" for "carryovers of unused investment credits, work incentive program credits, new employee credits, alcohol fuel credits, research credits, employee stock ownership credits, foreign taxes, and capital losses" in item 383.

**1981**—Pub. L. 97–34, title II, §221(b)(1)(E), title III, §331(d)(1)(E), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 246, 295, inserted references to alcohol fuel credits, research credits, and employee stock ownership credits in item 383. For applicability of amendment by section 221(b)(1)(E) to amounts paid or incurred after June 30, 1981, and before Jan. 1, 1986, see section 221(d) of Pub. L. 97–34, set out as an Effective Date note under section 30 of this title.

**1977**—Pub. L. 95–30, title II, §202(d)(3)(D), May 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 148, inserted "new employee credits," after "work incentive program credits," in item 383.

**1971**—Pub. L. 92–178, title III, §302(b), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 521, added item 383.
§ 3137.74 What must I do after BLM approves my continuing development obligations plan? No later than 90 calendar days after BLM's approval of your plan submitted under 3137.71(b), you must certify to BLM that you started operations to fulfill your continuing development obligations. BLM may require you to— ( a ) Supply documentation to support your certification; and
( b ) Submit periodic reports that demonstrate continuing development.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with the form 10-KSB of Health  Discovery  Corporation  formerly
Direct  Wireless  Communications  Inc. for the Year ended  December 31, 2004, I,
Robert  S.  Braswell  IV,  Chief  Administrative  Officer  of  Health  Discovery
Corporation,  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of my knowledge  and
belief, that;

such Form 10-KSB for the year ended,  December 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

the  information  contained  in such  Form  10-KSB  for the year  ended,  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operation of Health Discovery Corporation.

/s/ Robert S. Braswell IV
----------------------------
Robert S. Braswell IV
Chief Administrative Officer


                                     E-101
#### Paramount Pictures, Inc., Respondent, v. Harry Brandt et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ. [193 Misc. 657.] [See *post,*p. 668.]
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Detail

# Comparing Alternative Mechanisms To Increase Fruit and Vegetable Purchases

Economic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-170) 33 pp, April 2017

by Mark  Prell and David  Smallwood

ERS compares three possible enhancements to SNAP benefits to encourage fruit and vegetable purchases by participants.

**Keywords:** SNAP, fruit, vegetable, consumption, WIC, Double-Up Bucks, cash value vouchers

**In this publication...**

-  Entire Report 
-  Download Zip file for EIB-170 
-  Report summary 

-  Food & Nutrition Assistance 
-  Food & Nutrition Assistance Research 
-  Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) 
-  WIC Program 
-  Food Choices & Health 
-  Diet Quality & Nutrition 
-  Food Consumption & Demand 

-  Food and Nutrition Assistance Research Reports Database 
-  Food Consumption and Nutrient Intakes 

**Last updated:** Wednesday, April 05, 2017

**For more information contact:**Mark  Prell and David  Smallwood
**Exhibit 21**ARRIS Group Inc. & SubsidiariesARRIS Group Inc., 58-2588724 (Delaware)     Electronic Connector Corp. of Illinois, 36-3542005 (Illinois)     ARRIS Korea, Inc., 51-0559046 (Delaware)     ARRIS Korea, Inc. Korea Branch     ARRIS International Netherlands, B.V. (Netherlands)     ARRIS International Iberia, S.L., (Spain)     Communicaciones Broadband S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)     ANTEC Latin America, Inc., Sucursal Argentina (Argentina) (fka CommunicacionesBroadband Argentina, S.A.)     ANTEC Do Brasil LTDA (Brasil) (fka Communicaciones Broadband do Brasil, LTDA)     Arris International Japan Kabushiki Kaisha (Tokyo, Japan)     ARRIS International Telecommunicaciones (Chile)     Arris Communications Ireland Limited (Ireland)
Exhibit 32**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of InferX Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), each of the undersignedofficers of the Company, hereby certify that to such officer’s knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Dated:June 13, 2007               By:      /s/ B.K. Gogia                  B.K. Gogia           Chief Executive Officer         Dated:June 13, 2007               By:      /s/ Scott B. Parliament                  Scott B. Parliament           Chief Financial Officer       The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separatedisclosure document.
§ 3214.10 Who must post a geothermal bond? ( a ) The lessee or operator must post a bond with BLM before exploration, drilling, or utilization operations begin.
( b ) Before we approve a lease transfer or recognize a new designated operator, the lessee or operator must file a new bond or a rider to the existing bond, unless all previous operations on the land have already been reclaimed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41391 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DEMETRIO CHAVEZ-JACINTO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-01-CR-773-ALL

-------------------- October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Demetrio Chavez-Jacinto appeals the 70-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the United States after having been deported in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the first time on appeal, Chavez-Jacinto argues that the sentencing provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) & (2) are unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000).No. 01-41391 -2- Chavez-Jacinto acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United
States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). ChavezJacinto’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### § 3461.2 Unsuitability assessment procedures.
#### § 3436.2-2 Federal coal deposits subject to disposal by exchange.

The coal deposits offered in exchange by the Secretary shall be determined to be acceptable for further consideration for coal leasing pursuant to § 3420.1 of this title and shall be in the same State as the coal deposit offered in exchange by the proponent.
#### § 30.503 What happens if an heir or devisee participates in the killing of the decedent?

Any person who knowingly participates, either as a principal or as an accessory before the fact, in the willful and unlawful killing of the decedent may not take, directly or indirectly, any inheritance or devise under the decedent's will. This person will be treated as if he or she had predeceased the decedent.

[73 FR 67289, Nov. 13, 2008. Redesignated at 86 FR 72089, Dec. 20, 2021]
No. 89-1254.

#### Whitfield *v.*Coca-Cola Co. et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Blackmun took no part in: the consideration or decision of this petition.
### §3403. Integration of services authorized

The Secretary shall, after approving a plan submitted by an Indian tribe in accordance with section 3407 of this title, authorize the Indian tribe to, in accordance with the plan—

(1) integrate the programs and Federal funds received by the Indian tribe in accordance with waiver authority granted under section 3406(d) of this title; and

(2) coordinate the employment, training, and related services provided with those funds in a consolidated and comprehensive tribal plan.

(Pub. L. 102–477, §4, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2302; Pub. L. 115–93, §5, Dec. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 2027.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Pub. L. 115–93 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The Secretary of the Interior, in cooperation with the appropriate Secretary of Labor, Secretary of Health and Human Services, or Secretary of Education, shall, upon the receipt of a plan acceptable to the Secretary of the Interior submitted by an Indian tribal government, authorize the tribal government to coordinate, in accordance with such plan, its federally funded employment, training, and related services programs in a manner that integrates the program services involved into a single, coordinated, comprehensive program and reduces administrative costs by consolidating administrative functions."
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search USGS
-     - USGS Publications Warehouse
  - Contact
  - 							   Explore recent     publications by USGS Authors						    
  - 							   Browse all of Pubs     Warehouse by Publication type and year						    
  - FAQS
  - Web     Service Documentation
  - Other     Resources
  - 							       Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series 
- USGS Publications   Warehouse
- Explore    - 							   Explore recent     publications by USGS Authors						    
  - 							   Browse all of Pubs     Warehouse by Publication type and year 
- Documentation    - FAQS
  - Web     Service Documentation
  - Other     Resources
  - 							       Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series 
- Contact
Search:					    				    			                                             Geology of Saipan, Mariana Islands; Part 3, PaleontologyProfessional Paper 280-E-J- By:
- J. H.   Johnson,                           M.N. Bramlette,                           W.R. Riedel,                             Ruth   Todd,                           W.S. Cole,                          and C.W. Cooke                           
TweetLinks- Document:  Document                                  (pdf)
- Plates:
Plate 2                                    (pdf)
Plate 4                                    (pdf)

- Companion File:  Chart 1                                  (pdf)
- Paper   version: In   stock and available from the  USGS Store
- Download citation as:   RIS
Abstract
No abstract available.
Study AreaAdditional publication details- Publication type:
- Report
- Publication Subtype:
- USGS Numbered Series
- Title:
- Geology of Saipan, Mariana Islands; Part 3, Paleontology
- Series title:
- Professional Paper
- Series number:
- 280
- Chapter:
- E-J
- Year Published:
- 1957
- Language:
- English
- Publisher:
- U.S. Government Printing Office
- Publisher location:
- Washington, D.C.
- Description:
- Report: 364 p.; 2 Plates: 27.31 x 35.94 inches and 25.55 x 30.26 inches;   Chart
- First page:
- 209
- Last page:
- 364
- Country:
- Saipan
- Online Only (Y/N):
- N
- Additional Online Files (Y/N):
- N

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found here.

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacy					   Policies and Notices				    

					   U.S. Department of the Interior				    				    | 				    U.S. Geological Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp280EJ                    				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: June 01, 2016 10:36:22
(No. 908

Claimant awarded $2,500.00.)

#### Mary Hasbrouch, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Respondeat *superior*— social *justice and equity.*The State is not liable for injuries sustained by its employees while in the discharge of their duty, but on the ground of social justice and equity an award may be made to such employee.

Frank O. Hanson, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a-case brought on account of injuries sustained while she was regularly employed as a civil service nurse in the Children’s Nursery at the Illinois Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Orphans Home; that during her employment and while in the course of employment she slipped upon an icy walk, fell and injured her hip, breaking the hip bone; that since said accident she has suffered intense pain and is still severely and permanently incapacitated. It further appears that the claimant was a valuable and faithful servant of the State and that she is without means of support, other than the charity of her friends and her community.

It is the opinion of this court that in equity and good conscience an allowance should be had in this case as it is our belief that a reasonable protection should be given by the State to those of her servants who were injured in the line of duty. It is therefore recommended that claimant be allowed the sum of $2,500.00.