alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section** **302 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 
| I, Kevin J. Wiersma, Chief Financial Officer, certify that: |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 
| Dated:   July 27, 2006 | By:   /s/ Kevin J. Wiersma                |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                   | Kevin J. Wiersma

Chief Financial Officer |

 

 
| 35 |
|----|

 

----
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

59–011 2007

110th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document, 110–57 

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY 

WITH RESPECT TO THE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON 

THE UNITED STATES OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

NOTIFICATION THAT THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARED 

WITH RESPECT TO THE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON THE UNITED 

STATES OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 IS TO CONTINUE IN EFFECT 

BEYOND SEPTEMBER 14, 2007, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d) 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2007.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 

1622(d), provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the 

President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the 

Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. Consistent with this provision, I 

have sent to the Federal Register the enclosed notice, stating that 

the emergency declared with respect to the terrorist attacks on the 

United States of September 11, 2001, is to continue in effect for an 

additional year. 

The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on September 14, 

2001, of a national emergency continues. For this reason, I have 

determined that it is necessary to continue in effect after September 14, 2007, the national emergency with respect to the terrorist threat. 

GEORGE W. BUSH. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, September 12, 2007. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with HEARING

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
(3) 

NOTICE

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO

CERTAIN TERRORIST ATTACKS

Consistent with section 202(d) of the, National Emergencies Act 

(50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency I declared on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, 

with respect to the terrorist attacks at the World Trade Center, 

New York, New York, the Pentagon, and aboard United Airlines 

flight 93, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States. 

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency 

declared on September 14, 2001, last extended on September 5, 

2006, and the powers and authorities adopted to deal with that 

emergency, must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2007. 

Therefore, I am continuing in effect for an additional year the national emergency I declared on September 14, 2001, with respect to 

the terrorist threat. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. 

GEORGE W. BUSH. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, September 12, 2007. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
§ 3212.27 How will BLM or MMS review my request to modify the lease royalty rate terms? After you submit your request to modify the royalty rate terms under § 3212.25, BLM will: ( a ) Review your application, and if BLM determines that: ( 1 ) Your application is complete and contains all necessary information, we will notify you of the date on which your complete request was received; or
( 2 ) Your request is not complete or does not contain all necessary information, we will notify you of the additional information that is required;
( b ) Analyze the data you submitted to establish a royalty rate if the geothermal resources are used for commercial electrical generation;
( c ) Consult with MMS and any state or local governments that may be affected by the change in royalty rate terms; and
( d ) ( 1 ) No later than 140 days after the day on which we determine a complete request with all necessary information was received, BLM will send you written notification of the proposed royalty rate that BLM determines to be revenue neutral.
( 2 ) If you reject the proposed rate, we must receive written notification from you no later than 30 days after the date of your receipt of our notification. BLM will accept a faxed notification received within the 30-day time limit. However, following the fax, you must submit to BLM written notification which BLM must receive no later than the 179th day following the day on which BLM determines we received your complete request.
( 3 ) If you reject the proposed royalty rate on a timely basis: ( i ) BLM will not issue a decision modifying the royalty rate terms of your lease;
( ii ) The existing royalty rate terms in your lease continue to apply; and
( iii ) You may not reapply for a royalty rate term conversion under § 3212.25.
( 4 ) Unless timely written notification is received from you rejecting the proposed rate, BLM will issue a decision modifying the royalty rate terms of your lease no later than 180 days after the day on which we determine a complete request was received. The effective date of the new royalty rate is the first day of the month following the date on which the decision was issued. For example, a decision issued on July 21, will become effective on August 1.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL L. SCOTT

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2554

[ November 21, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Geoffrey D. Cohen

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14011381 CF10A

.

Michael L. Scott, Moore Haven, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER

, F ORST and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                         5

<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                            287
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                    7664
<ALLOWANCES>                      375
<INVENTORY>                      1147
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 9623
<PP&E>                          13774
<DEPRECIATION>                 (11089)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  25693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           11028
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                          437
<OTHER-SE>                      12173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    25693
<SALES>                         26061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                26061
<CGS>                           17087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   24216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  1250
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              1250
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                     1250
<EPS-BASIC>                    0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0.42





</TABLE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Jobs for Which You Can Train Through Apprenticeship

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Jobs for Which You Can Train Through Apprenticeship*,										May 1980,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/868,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### §2721. Severability

In the event that any section or provision of this chapter, or amendment made by this chapter, is held invalid, it is the intent of Congress that the remaining sections or provisions of this chapter, and amendments made by this chapter, shall continue in full force and effect.

(Pub. L. 100–497, §22, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2486.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 100–497, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2467, known as the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2701 of this title and Tables.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 OF THE

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MAX CAPITAL GROUP LTD.

This certification is provided
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008 of Max Capital Group Ltd. (the
Issuer).

I, W. Marston Becker, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer certify that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: February 19, 2009



/s/    W. MARSTON
BECKERName:    W. Marston Becker
§ 2801.10 How do I appeal a BLM decision issued under the regulations in this part? ( a ) You may appeal a BLM decision issued under the regulations in this part in accordance with part 4 of this title.
( b ) All BLM decisions under this part remain in effect pending appeal unless the Secretary of the Interior rules otherwise, or as noted in this part. You may petition for a stay of a BLM decision under this part with the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of the Interior. Unless otherwise noted in this part, BLM will take no action on your application while your appeal is pending.
#### HANLEY, Respondent, v. CITY *OF*SIOUX FALLS, Appellant. HANLEY, a Minor, by Leo J. Hanley, Guardian Ad Litem, Respondent, v. CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, Appellant.

(206 N. W. 240.)

(File Nos. 5558, 5559.

Opinion filed December 9, 1925.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha County; Hon. Asa Forrest, Judge.

*Roy B. Marker,*of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.

*Gamble & Buddy,*of Sioux Falls, for Respondent.

Respondent cited: Gellenbeck v. City of Mo-bridge, 40 S. D: 157; 166 N. W. 631.

POLLEY, P. J.

Both of these actions grow out of the same-facts. Leo J. Hanley, plaintiff in No.' 5558, is the father of Grace Elizabeth Hanley, and is acting as guardian ad litem for Grace Elizabeth Hanley, plaintiff in No. 5559. The complaint alleges that Grace Elizabeth Hanley suffered personal injuries through the negligence of defendant in leaving an unguarded opening .in one of its streets. Because of these injuries, Leo J. Hanley paid certain sums for medical attendance, and brings this action to- recover from defendant.

In No-. 55.591 'Grace Elizabeth Hanley, by her guardian adi litem, sues to- recover for personal injuries to herself.

Defendant demurred to the complaint in each action on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrers in both actions are based on the sole ground that no proper statutory notice, as required by section 6339, R. C. 1919, was served on defendant before commencing the actions.

*92The demurrers are fully disposed of by what is said in Gellenbeck v. City of Mobridge, 40 S. D. 157, 166 N. W. 631, and, upon the authority of that case, the demurrers were rightly overruled.

The orders appealed from are affirmed'.
### §458ccc. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458ccc was editorially reclassified as section 5411 of this title.
§ 3267.10 How do I request a variance from BLM requirements that apply to my drilling operations? ( a ) You may file a request for a variance from the requirements of § 3200.4 for your approved drilling operations. Your request must include enough information to explain: ( 1 ) Why you cannot comply with the requirements of § 3200.4; and
( 2 ) Why you need the variance to control your well, conserve natural resources, or protect public health and safety, property, or the environment.
( b ) We may approve your request orally or in writing. If BLM gives you an oral approval, we will follow up with written confirmation.
### §564. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §1, 68 Stat. 718, which set out the purpose of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals; Recoupment of Funds Expended for Klamath County School Board

Act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §24, 68 Stat. 723, as amended by Pub. L. 85–72, June 29, 1957, 71 Stat. 243, which repealed all acts or parts thereof inconsistent with this subchapter insofar as they affect the tribe or its members and provided that, effective on July 1, 1957, section 2 of the Act of August 19, 1949, was inapplicable to the unrecouped balance of funds expended in cooperation with the school board of Klamath County, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### Separability

Act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §25, 68 Stat. 723, which provided that all provisions of this subchapter be separable, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Annual Report of First National Power Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter Wanner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Peter Wanner Peter Wanner Dated: July 28, 2008
#### New York Life Insurance Company v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ. [See companion case in *New York Life Ins. Co.*v. *Glens Falls Ins. Co.,*274 App. Div. 1045.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,389
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (686)
<INVENTORY>                                    129,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               218,973
<PP&E>                                         101,591
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (59)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 440,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,714
<BONDS>                                        181,849
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   440,070
<SALES>                                        221,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               223,206
<CGS>                                          178,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (363)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,605)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,605)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERREQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Andrew Gatto, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | May 10,  2005                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |                                    |
|   | /s/ ANDREW  GATTO                  |   |
|   |                                    |
|   | Andrew  Gatto                           |
|   | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Russ Berrieand Company, Inc. and will be retained by Russ Berrie and Company, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of
Playlogic Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Willem M. Smit, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
              
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: October 10, 2008
            
            /s/
      Willem M. Smit
              Willem
      M. Smit
              Chief
      Executive Officer