alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2141]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

January 22, 2004.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 4, 2004, 
to be assured of consideration.

Bureau of the Public Debt (PD)

    OMB Number: 1535-0120.
    Form Number: PD F 5366, PD F 5354 and PD F 5367.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: FHA New Account Request, Transaction Request, and Transfer 
Request.
    Description: Used to establish account, change information on 
account, and transfer ownership.
    Respondents: Individuals or households, business or other for-
profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 600.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 10 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden Hours: 102 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Vicki S. Thorpe, (304) 480-6553, Bureau of the 
Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, West VA 26106-1328.
    OMB Reviewer: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-2141 Filed 2-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURUSANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE ARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Annual Report of ColonyRIH Holdings, Inc. and Resorts International Hotel and Casino, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Audrey Oswell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

| /s/ AUDREY S. OSWELL                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |   |
| **Audrey S. Oswell**                      |   |
| **President and Chief Executive Officer** |   |
|                                      |   |
| March 27, 2003                            |   |
### §677j. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1009, §11, 68 Stat. 873, which set out permitted uses of tribal funds and imposed restrictions on the use of tribal funds by the mixed-blood group until its adoption of a plan for termination of Federal supervision of the group, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3285.1 When may BLM terminate a unit agreement?

BLM may terminate a unit agreement if the unit operator does not comply with any term or condition of the unit agreement.
### §465b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Feb. 24, 1942, ch. 113, §2, 56 Stat. 121, which defined "Klamath Tribe of Indians", was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 2743.1 Applicable regulations.

Unless the requested action falls within the provision of § 2743.2(b), applications filed or actions taken under this subpart shall be subject to all the requirements set forth in subpart 2741 of this chapter except §§ 2741.6 and 2741.9.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2004 / Presidential Documents 58249

Proclamation 7822 of September 25, 2004

National Hunting and Fishing Day, 2004

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation

America is a land of majestic beauty, and we take pride in our wildlife, 

forests, mountains, lakes, rivers, and coastlines. Outdoor recreation is an 

important part of our Nation’s heritage. On National Hunting and Fishing 

Day, we celebrate the remarkable progress we have made in conserving 

our environment and recognize those who have worked to conserve our 

natural resources. 

America’s hunters and anglers represent the great spirit of our country 

and are among our Nation’s foremost conservationists. These citizens have 

worked to protect habitat and restore fish and wildlife populations. They 

volunteer their time, talents, and energy to countless conservation projects, 

because they recognize the importance of maintaining the natural abundance 

of our country for future generations. 

My Administration is committed to achieving a cleaner, safer, and healthier 

environment for all Americans, including our hunters and anglers. My Administration has expanded opportunities to hunt and fish at national wildlife 

refuges and improved habitat on public and private lands. We have cut 

phosphorus releases into our rivers and streams, and I signed the Healthy 

Forests Restoration Act to help protect our forests from the risk of wildfires. 

Americans are blessed to live amid many wonders of nature, and we have 

a responsibility to be good stewards of the land. I commend all who advance 

conservation and help our citizens enjoy the benefits of our environment. 

These efforts ensure that our national heritage remains a source of pride 

for our citizens, our communities, and our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 25, 2004, 

as National Hunting and Fishing Day. I call upon the people of the United 

States to join me in recognizing the contributions of America’s hunters 

and anglers, and all those who work to conserve our Nation’s fish and 

wildlife resources.

58250 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2004 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fifth 

day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of 

the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and 

Billing code 3195

Filed 9

[FR Doc. 04

–28–04; 9:04 am] 

–22043

–01–P 

twenty-ninth.

W
#### John Bernardo, Jr., an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Edison Company, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the 38th day of June, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered on the 35th day of August. 1913, denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

We think the verdict was clearly against the weight of evidence, and, therefore, there must be a new trial. The judgment and order appealed from are reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.
#### Dry Dock Savings Institution, Appellant, v. Louis Selikowitz et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Feck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-02-15T01:50:05-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
§ 3211.21 When do I owe minimum royalty? ( a ) You do not owe minimum royalties for: ( 1 ) Leases issued on or after August 8, 2005 (other than for leases issued in response to applications that were pending on that date for which no election is made under § 3200.8(b)(1)); and
( 2 ) Leases issued before August 8, 2005, for which an election is made under § 3200.7(a)(2).
( b ) For leases issued before August 8, 2005, for which no election is made under § 3200.7(a)(2), and for leases issued in response to applications pending on that date for which no election is made under § 3200.8(b)(1), you owe minimum royalty of $2.00 per acre (to be paid to MMS) when: ( 1 ) You have not begun actual production following the BLM's determination that you have a well capable of commercial production; or
( 2 ) The value of actual production is so low that royalty you would pay under the scheduled rate is less than $2.00 per acre (this applies to situations of no production, as long as the lease remains in effect).
#### § 3255.12 How long will information I give BLM remain confidential or proprietary?

The FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552) does not provide a finite period of time during which information may be exempt from public disclosure. BLM will review each situation individually and in accordance with part 2 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         417,397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               472,355
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 492,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,240,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (748,662)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   492,296
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,927
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,219
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,219
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,219
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
12/5/13 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Mail - 100 Year Benefit Period vs. Simplified SCRB Method Discussed 10/21/11 

100 Year Benefit Period vs. Simplified SCRB Method Discussed 10/21/11 

Maria Pattison <mpattison@westlandswater.org> Wed, Nov20, 2013 at 11:17 AM 

To: bmillerle\/y@usbr.gov 

Cc: Larry Bauman <lbauman@cvpwater.org>, Kiti Buelna <kbuelna@westlandswater.org>, Stephen Farmer 

<sfarmer@westlandswater.org>, Bobbie Ormonde <bormonde@westlandswater.org> 

Brook, 

I was a little confused otierthe discussion of historical benefits at yesterdays' 11/19/13 Public Meeting on 

Benefits, specifically the 100 year benefit period. I was able to do a little digging this morning and found some 

discussion on a Simplified SCRB Method for the CAS. 

Below is a link on the CAS website to the 10/21/11 Public Meeting #2 presentation that discusses a Simplified 

Methodology for SCRB to be used for the Cost Allocation Study. Please refer to pages 7 to 9 of this presentation 

of that meeting. The simplified method started off looking at benefits from years 2010 to 2060 and going to 

historical benefits from 1980 if the 50 year 'future' benefit stream is less than the single purpose altemative cost. 

At any rate it was only going to go back an additional 30 years to 1980, the date of the New Melones Dam and 

ReserMoir completion. 

http;//ww\v.usbr,gov/mp/cvp/cvp-cas/docs/meetings/10-21-2012/CVP%20Cost%20Alkx:ation% 

20Presentation%2010%2021 %2011 .ppt 

This was also documented at the 6/29/12 meeting in the Draft Assumptions, Period of Analysis. 

http:/,/>AYw.usbr,gov/rnp/Gvp/cvp-cas/dQcs/meetiRgs/6~29-12/Drafl%20Assumptions% 

20Approach%20June%2029%202012.pdf 

Am I misunderstanding the simplified method that Traci discussed? Was the simplified SCRB method 

subsequently rejected as an altemati\«? 

I can submit this question on a more formal basis if you prefer.
§ 10010.26 Format. ( a ) Proposed departures from the standard format described in the CEQ regulations and this part must be approved by the Executive Director.
( b ) The section listing the preparers of the EIS will also include other sources of information, including a bibliography or list of cited references, when appropriate.
( c ) The section listing the distribution of the EIS will also briefly describe the consultation and public involvement processes utilized in planning the proposal and in preparing the EIS, if this information is not discussed elsewhere in the document.
( d ) If CEQ's standard format is not used or if the EIS is combined with another planning or decision making document, the section which analyzes the environmental consequences of the proposal and its alternatives will be clearly and separately identified and not interwoven into other portions of or spread throughout the document.
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Al aska Environmental Studies Program

Proposed Study for FY 2013

Formatting Guidance: We recommend st udy profiles be less than 2 pages . Please do not try to make this a detailed scope of work. If th e study is selected fo r further consideration, BOEM will prepare a more detailed scope of wo rk. Please provide the following categories of information.

Region: Alaska [Standard for all.]

Planning Area(s): [e.g., Beaufort Sea, Chukchi Sea, North Aleutian Basin as applicable. See Fig.1 of the Plan.]

Title: [Fill in concise title.]

BOEM Information Need(s) to be Addressed: Provide brief and conclusive reason(s) why BOEM needs the information. For example, id entify how the study re lates to analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act and/or specific BOEM decision(s), such as formulation of a mitigation measure. Please be as specific as possible.

Period of Performance: FY 2013-20 XX

Description: Background : Please provide 1 to 2 paragraphs on rel evant issues. Explain what information is required and provide pertinent background. In clude details about whethe r this study ties in with other efforts, and if so, how. Include a desc ription of the current st atus of information. That is, what is the level of adequacy of existing information, does any exist, does it need to be more geographically specific?

Objectives : Clearly and succinctly state the objective(s) of the study. Explain what hypothesis will be tested or what questions will be answered by this study. We encourage the use of lists (1, 2, 3, etc.) for multiple, related objectives.

Methods : Provide brief detail on what information, t echniques or methods are available that could be used. Explain how the objectives of the study will be accomplished.

Date information is required: Provide dates when products woul d be most useful, such as “Final report is needed by December 2015.” If the product of the study is something additional to the scientific repor t (e.g. database, model, bibliography ), explain in this section.
### §484. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 14, 1954, ch. 472, §1, 68 Stat. 467, which related to conversion of exchange assignments of tribal lands on certain Sioux reservations into trust titles and continued trust and tax exemption thereon, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3261.22 How do I get approval for subsequent well operations?

Send BLM a Sundry Notice describing your proposed operation. For some routine work, such as cleanouts, surveys, or general maintenance (see § 3264.11(b)), we may waive the Sundry Notice requirement. Contact your local BLM office to ask about waivers for subsequent well operations. Unless you receive a waiver, you must submit a Sundry Notice. Do not start your operations until we grant a waiver or approve the Sundry Notice.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 757

 757

 703

 737

 754

 730

 731

 735

 727

 747

 778

 780

 790

 783

 775

 825

 842

 826

 843

 845

 825

 765

 759

 777

 780

 805

 830

 820

 783

 665

 450

 721

 704

 654

 671

 729

 694

 710

 705

 696

 721

 730

 741

 735

 743

 740

 787

 816

 777

 812

 812

 740

 741

 708

 716

 743

 745

 788

 777

 671

 407

 343

 741

 731

 677

 699

 738

 717

 718

 722

 708

 731

 746

 762

 774

 761

 754

 815

 829

 797

 833

 835

 775

 752

 731

 748

 765

 767

 816

 804

 729

 562

 396

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 14, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 19,105

 19,385

 19,585

 19,756

 19,963

 20,127

 20,269

 20,401

 20,515

 20,658

 20,805

 20,969

 21,153

 21,308

 21,437

 21,619

 21,806

 21,945

 22,089

 22,225

 22,286

 22,324

 22,348

 22,375

 22,436

 22,492

 22,601

 22,676

 22,679

 22,537

 22,192

 637

 646

 653

 659

 665

 671

 676

 680

 684

 689

 694

 699

 705

 710

 715

 721

 727

 732

 736

 741

 743

 744

 745

 746

 748

 750

 753

 756

 756

 751

 740

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
(No. 855

Claimant awarded $655.92.)

#### Oak Park Trust and Savings Bank, Executor of the Estate of Jesse H. Baldwin, Deceased, *et al.,*Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 28, 1925.*

Inheritance *tax*— when *refund will he made.*Where it is shown at the hearing upon appeal from an order fixing an inheritance tax, that mistakes and errors had been made in the appraisement of the estate and assessment of the tax, a refund' will he made of the amount of the tax erroneously paid.

Herrick, Vette & Peregrine, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim filed by Oak Park Trust and Savings bank, executor of the will of Jesse A. Baldwin, deceased, Oneida Institute, and Baptist Ministers’ Aid Society of Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois and Wisconsin for refund of six hundred fifty-five and 92/100 dollars inheritance tax erroneously paid to the State.

Jesse A. Baldwin died a resident of Cook county, Illinois, on December 7, 1921, leaving a last will and testament, and letters testamentary issued to the said executor, who is still acting as executor.

*58Proper,proceedings, were had to fix the inheritance taxes under the laws of Illinois and such tax was fixed and paid. In due time it was discovered by the executor that certain ’mi stakes and errors had been made in the appraisements and assessments, and an appeal was prayed and perfected to the proper court; and on trial on such appeal the court found that claimant had overpaid the sum claimed in this suit, to-wit: $655.92, which petitioner prays may be refunded to it. The record evidence is filed and shows conclusively claimants right to recover the said sum. The Attorney General states that he had read the petition and proof in this case and that he finds same to be true and in writing- consents to the allowance of the claim.

The court accordingly awards claimant the sum of $655.92.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdvances in Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics Analyses for Metallic Aircraft StructuresThis paper reviews some of the advances that have been made in stress analyses of cracked aircraft components, in the understanding of the fatigue and fatigue-crack growth process, and in the prediction of residual strength of complex aircraft structures with widespread fatigue damage. Finite-element analyses of cracked metallic structures are now used to determine accurate stress-intensity factors for cracks at structural details. Observations of small-crack behavior at open and rivet-loaded holes and the development of small-crack theory has lead to the prediction of stress-life behavior for components with stress concentrations under aircraft spectrum loading. Fatigue-crack growth under simulated aircraft spectra can now be predicted with the crack-closure concept. Residual strength of cracked panels with severe out-of-plane deformations (buckling) in the presence of stiffeners and multiple-site damage can be predicted with advanced elastic-plastic finite-element analyses and the critical crack-tip-opening angle (CTOA) fracture criterion. These advances are helping to assure continued safety of aircraft structures.Document ID20000040431Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNewman, J. C., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 2000Subject CategoryMetals And Metallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2000-210084L-17955NAS 1.15:210084Meeting InformationMeeting: Aeronautical FatigueLocation: Seattle, WACountry: United StatesStart Date: July 12, 1999End Date: July 16, 1999Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 706-11-11-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000040431.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024