alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2808.10 What is trespass? ( a ) Trespass is using, occupying, developing, or subleasing the public lands or their resources without a required authorization or in a way that is beyond the scope and terms and conditions of your authorization. Trespass is a prohibited act.
( b ) Trespass includes acts or omissions causing unnecessary or undue degradation to the public lands or their resources. In determining whether such degradation is occurring, BLM may consider the effects of the activity on resources and land uses outside the area of the activity.
( c ) There are two kinds of trespass, willful and non-willful. ( 1 ) *Willful trespass* is voluntary or conscious trespass and includes trespass committed with criminal or malicious intent. It includes a consistent pattern of actions taken with knowledge, even if those actions are taken in the belief that the conduct is reasonable or legal.
( 2 ) *Non-willful trespass* is trespass committed by mistake or inadvertence.
[70 FR 21058, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 89 FR 25965, Apr. 12, 2024]
### §1041b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 106–568, title VII, §704, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2914, which reaffirmed Federal recognition of the tribe and trust relationship between the United States and the tribe and set forth provisions relating to special programs eligibility and continuation of Federal benefits, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 589

 626

 639

 622

 638

 663

 643

 662

 654

 645

 666

 696

 716

 753

 753

 721

 748

 759

 758

 747

 715

 703

 772

 728

 712

 779

 813

 742

 747

 810

 533

 585

 595

 568

 598

 606

 600

 623

 606

 577

 602

 609

 672

 687

 691

 662

 655

 695

 704

 660

 661

 662

 694

 672

 657

 671

 718

 704

 702

 717

 554

 607

 619

 604

 618

 641

 623

 651

 633

 603

 631

 655

 700

 726

 730

 701

 708

 731

 727

 713

 689

 679

 726

 702

 688

 726

 767

 726

 721

 765

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 14,073

 14,091

 14,130

 14,184

 14,238

 14,355

 14,470

 14,597

 14,695

 14,730

 14,796

 14,908

 15,036

 15,195

 15,357

 15,454

 15,677

 15,969

 16,379

 16,899

 17,391

 17,740

 18,115

 18,496

 18,861

 19,213

 19,558

 19,829

 20,098

 20,364

 469

 470

 471

 473

 475

 479

 482

 487

 490

 491

 493

 497

 501

 507

 512

 515

 523

 532

 546

 563

 580

 591

 604

 617

 629

 640

 652

 661

 670

 679

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Westlands Water District 

3130 N. Fresno Street, P.O. Box 6056, Fresno, California 93703-6056, (559) 224-1523, FAX (559) 241-6277 

January 12, 2015 

Ms. Brooke Miller-Levy, MP-730 

Project Manager, Central Valley Project Cost Allocation Study 

Bureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Regional Office 

2800 Cottage Way 

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Subject: Central Valley Project (CVP) Cost Allocation Study (CAS) 

Issue Paper: Considerations on the Two Cost Allocation and Two-Period 

Repayment Approach 

Dear Ms. Miller-Levy: 

Westlands Water District (District) has reviewed the Issue Paper: Considerations on the 

Two Cost Allocation and Two-Period Repayment Approach that was posted to the CVP 

CAS website on December 12, 2014 which proposes that the cost allocation factors 

resulting from the current CAS be effective either January 1, 1988 or October 30, 1992. 

The Issue Paper explains that these dates are appropriate because they represent 

major reoperation dates for the CVP and correspond to PL 99-546 Coordinated 

Operations Act and PL 102-575 CVP Improvement Act respectively. 

Through CAS Stakeholder meetings the District along with other CVP water and power 

contractors have requested additional information to allow for a more informed comment 

on this topic. The information requested includes, in part, how proportional costs will be 

allocated to Water Quality and how Reclamation will be forecasting future deliveries. 

The dates proposed by Reclamation are not the only significant shifts in CVP 

operations. Other major shifts include the 1994 Water Quality Plan (D1641) 

promulgated by the California State Water Resources Control Board, the December 

2000 Record of Decision for the restoration of the Trinity River and its fish and wildlife 

populations and the 2008 and 2009 Bi-Ops decisions for Delta Smelt and Salmon. As 

the Bureau is well aware, each of these regulatory actions has had a significant impact 

on the operation of the CVP and its ability to provide a reliable water supply to South of 

Delta contractors. 

If no other options are to be considered, the District would consider accepting October 

30, 1992 for ceasing use of the existing allocation factors and implementing the updated 

factors based on the current CAS. However, this is not the only reasonable date that 

Reclamation could support based exclusively on major CVP reoperation. 
January 12, 2015 

Page 2 

The District looks forward to Reclamation's response to our comments and to the 

release of all comments and responses to these matters. The District anticipates that it 

will have an opportunity to review and comment on the draft cost allocation decision 

prior to that decision becoming final. 

Please contact Mr. Stephen Farmer at 559-241-6240 or sfarmer(a)westlandswater.orq if 

you have any questions or require any additional information. 

Chief Operating Officer 

Attachments 

cc; Jason Phillips 

Deputy Regional Director 

Brenda Bryant 

Assistant Regional Director 

David Murillo 

Regional Director 

Sincerely 

Dan Pope
### §5142. Reduction of unpaid principal

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Agriculture may, on the application of the borrower of a loan or loans made under sections 5136 to 5143 of this title, reduce the unpaid principal balance of such loan or loans to the current fair market value of the land purchased with the proceeds of the loan or loans if—

(1) the fair market value of the land has declined by at least 25 percent since such land was purchased by the borrower;

(2) the land has been held by the borrower for a period of at least 5 years; and

(3) the Secretary of the Interior finds that the borrower has insufficient income to both repay the loan or loans and provide normal tribal governmental services.

#### (b) Fair market value

#### (1) Appraisal

Current fair market value under subsection (a) of this section shall be determined through an appraisal by an independent qualified fee appraiser, selected by mutual agreement between the borrower and the Secretary of Agriculture.

#### (2) Costs

The cost of appraisals undertaken under paragraph (1) shall be paid by the borrower.

#### (c) Appeals

Decisions of the Secretary of Agriculture under this section shall be appealable in accordance with the provisions of section 333B 1 of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1983b).

#### (d) Future applications

A borrower that had a loan or loans reduced under this section shall not submit an application for another reduction on such loan or loans for a period of 5 years after the initial reduction.

(Pub. L. 91–229, §6, as added Pub. L. 101–82, title III, §303, Aug. 14, 1989, 103 Stat. 583.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 333B of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1983b), referred to in subsec. (c), probably means section 333B of Pub. L. 87–128, as added by Pub. L. 99–198, title XIII, §1313(a), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1525, and amended, which related to appeals from adverse decisions under the Act, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §281(c), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3233, and enactment of a new section 333B of Pub. L. 87–128 by Pub. L. 110–234, title V, §5301, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1147, and Pub. L. 110–246, title V, §5301, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1908, which established a beginning farmers' pilot program.

#### Codification

Another section 6 of Pub. L. 91–229 was added by Pub. L. 101–624, title XVIII, §1854(b), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3837, and is classified to section 5143 of this title.

Section was formerly classified to section 493 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §640d–12. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §13, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1717; Pub. L. 96–305, §6, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 932; Pub. L. 100–666, §4(d), Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3931; Pub. L. 101–121, title I, §120, Oct. 23, 1989, 103 Stat. 722, which directed the Commissioner of the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation to prepare a report for Congress concerning relocation of households and members of each tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### **Subchapter C—Miscellaneous**

Sec.
2201.
Combat zone-related deaths of members of the Armed Forces, deaths of astronauts, and deaths of victims of certain terrorist attacks.
[2202.
Repealed.]
2203.
Definition of executor.
2204.
Discharge of fiduciary from personal liability.
2205.
Reimbursement out of estate.
2206.
Liability of life insurance beneficiaries.
2207.
Liability of recipient of property over which decedent had power of appointment.
2207A.
Right of recovery in the case of certain marital deduction property.
2207B.
Right of recovery where decedent retained interest.
2208.
Certain residents of possessions considered citizens of the United States.
2209.
Certain residents of possessions considered nonresidents not citizens of the United States.
[2210.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–312, title III, §301(a), Dec. 17, 2010, 124 Stat. 3300, amended analysis to read as if amendment by Pub. L. 107–16, §501(c)(1), had never been enacted. See 2001 Amendment note below.

**2003**—Pub. L. 108–121, title I, §110(c)(2)(B), Nov. 11, 2003, 117 Stat. 1342, inserted ", deaths of astronauts," after "Forces" in item 2201.

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–134, title I, §103(c), Jan. 23, 2002, 115 Stat. 2431, substituted "Combat zone-related deaths of members of the Armed Forces and deaths of victims of certain terrorist attacks." for "Members of the Armed Forces dying in combat zone or by reason of combat-zone-incurred wounds, etc." in item 2201.

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–16, title V, §501(c)(1), June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 69, added item 2210 "Termination".

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7304(b)(2)(C), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2353, struck out item 2210 "Liability for payment in case of transfer of employer securities to an employee stock ownership plan or a worker-owned cooperative".

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–647, title III, §3031(f)(2), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3638, added item 2207B.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title V, §544(b)(2), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 894, added item 2210.

**1981**—Pub. L. 97–34, title IV, §403(d)(4)(B), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 305, added item 2207A.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1902(b)(1), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1806, struck out item 2202 "Missionaries in foreign service".

**1975**—Pub. L. 93–597, §6(b)(3), Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1953, substituted "Members of the Armed Forces dying in combat zone or by reason of combat-zone-incurred wounds, etc." for "Members of the Armed Forces dying during an induction period." in item 2201.

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–614, title I, §101(d)(3), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1837, substituted "Discharge of fiduciary from personal liability" for "Discharge of executor from personal liability" in item 2204.

**1960**—Pub. L. 86–779, §4(b)(2), Sept. 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 1000, added item 2209.

**1958**—Pub. L. 85–866, title I, §102(c)(4), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1675, added item 2208.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 2,601

 2,545

 2,250

 2,571

 957

 2,562

 3,114

 2,753

 2,883

 2,608

 2,643

 3,104

 3,246

 2,877

 2,783

 2,660

 2,840

 3,830

 2,756

 2,871

 3,456

 3,108

 3,370

 3,636

 1,880

 2,412

 3,598

 2,983

 2,674

 2,356

 56,850

 56,478

 56,072

 55,406

 55,078

 53,233

 53,006

 53,314

 53,263

 53,339

 53,150

 53,003

 53,302

 53,720

 53,767

 53,723

 53,564

 53,584

 54,543

 54,434

 54,440

 55,001

 55,203

 55,645

 56,317

 55,287

 54,814

 55,491

 55,551

 55,313

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: October 18, 2012

 59,451

 59,023

 58,322

 57,977

 56,035

 55,795

 56,120

 56,067

 56,146

 55,947

 55,793

 56,107

 56,548

 56,597

 56,550

 56,383

 56,404

 57,414

 57,299

 57,305

 57,896

 58,109

 58,573

 59,281

 58,197

 57,699

 58,412

 58,474

 58,225

 57,669

 5,170,000

 5,149,000

 5,127,000

 5,106,000

 5,085,000

 5,063,000

 5,042,000

 5,021,000

 5,000,000

 4,978,000

 4,957,000

 4,936,000

 4,914,000

 4,893,000

 4,872,000

 4,850,000

 4,829,000

 4,808,000

 4,786,000

 4,765,000

 4,744,000

 4,722,000

 4,701,000

 4,680,000

 4,659,000

 4,637,000

 4,616,000

 4,595,000

 4,573,000

 4,552,000

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 59,842
Grupo Financiero|Galicia

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

For more information contact:

Pablo Firvida
VP Investor Relations
Telefax:  (5411) 4343-7528
pfirvida@gfgsa.com
------------------
investorelations@gfgsa.com
--------------------------
www.gfgsa.com
-------------


             GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A. WILL CALL A SHAREHOLDERS'
                         MEETING TO INCREASE ITS CAPITAL

Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 25, 2003, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.
("Grupo Galicia") (Buenos Aires Stock Exchange / NASDAQ: GGAL) announced today
that it intends to call an ordinary and extraordinary shareholders' meeting to
increase its share capital.

This capital increase is in connection with the restructuring of the foreign
currency debt subject to foreign law of Banco de Galicia y Buenos Aires S.A.
(the "Bank"), a 93.59% subsidiary of Grupo Galicia.

The Board of Directors will recommend to its shareholders a capital increase
through the issuance of up to 149 million mandatorily convertible preferred
shares in exchange for cash or up to US$100 million of nominal value in
subordinated debt of the Bank. The mandatorily convertible preferred shares will
mandatorily convert into Class B shares of Grupo Galicia on the first
anniversary of their issuance. The subscription price will be determined by the
Board of Directors within the range of prices that the shareholders will
determine.

The Board of Directors highlighted that the capital increase is necessary for
the Bank to conclude its debt restructuring successfully.

Grupo Galicia was formed on September 14, 1999 as a financial services holding
company organized under the laws of Argentina. Its most significant asset is its
interest in the Bank. The main objective of Grupo Galicia is to be one of
Argentina's leading comprehensive financial services companies while continuing
to strengthen the Bank's position as one of the country's leading financial
institutions.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Hiner, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Geocom Resources Inc.

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to date a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's control over financial reporting; and.

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

Date: October 14, 2004

/s/ John Hiner_________________________________
Signature:  John Hiner
Title:	  President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
### §458aaa–13. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458aaa–13 was editorially reclassified as section 5394 of this title.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7074** 

FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, f/k/a Jason Robert Goldader , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. G. HINKLE, Regional Director; MR. JENNINGS, Ex

- Warden of Augusta Correctional Center; BUILDING C/D SERGEANT; BUILDING C/D LIEUTENANT; LT. WHEELER; LINKENHOLKER; SHIFFLET, a/k/a Shiflett , Defendants

– Appellees,

and

AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER PERSONNEL; UNKNOWN; VIRGINIA D.O.C. AGENTS; OTHER AGENTS OF GOVERNMENT; COMMON FA RE: DEFENDANTS AT ACC; LAW LIBRARY: DEFENDANTS AT ACC; PERSONAL SAFETY: DEFENDANTS AT ACC PERSONNEL; DISEM M INATION: DEFENDANTS AT OR OUTSIDE ACC; RETALIATION: DEFENDANTS AT ACC, Cell Search or resultant; RETALIATION: DEFENDANTS AT OR OUTSIDE ACC, Transfer or resultants , Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Michael F. Urbanski , District Judge. ( 7:13

- cv
- 00506

- MFU

- RSB )

Submitted : October 16 , 2014 Decided: October 22 , 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN , and THACKER, Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Frankie Jae LordMaster, Appellant Pro Se. James Milburn Isaacs, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpubli shed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Frankie Jae LordMaster appeals the district court ’ s
order granting summary judgment to some Defendants on

LordMaster’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and dismissing
without prejudice the claims against the remaining Defendants
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (1) (2012). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny LordMaster’s pending Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, and affirm

for the reasons stated b y the district court. LordMaster v.
Hinkle , No. 7:13

- cv
- 00506

- MFU

- RSB (W.D. Va. July 9, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid t he decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 2568.20 What is the legal authority for these allotments? ( a ) The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, 43 U.S.C. 1601 *et seq.* (ANCSA), as amended.
( b ) Section 432 of Public Law 105-276, the Appropriations Act for the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development for fiscal year 1999, 43 U.S.C. 1629g, which amended ANCSA by adding section 41.
( c ) Section 301 of Public Law 106-559, the Indian Tribal Justice Technical and Legal Assistance Act of 2000, which amended section 41 of ANCSA.
( d ) The Native Allotment Act of 1906, 34 Stat. 197, as amended, 42 Stat. 415 and 70 Stat. 954, 43 U.S.C. 270-1 through 270-3 (1970).
[65 FR 40961, June 30, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 52547, Oct. 16, 2001]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joshua Ralston, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General
Enterprise Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2017 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Enterprise Ventures Inc.





|Date: April 6, 2023 |  |  | /s/ Joshua Ralston                      | 
|------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|                    |  |  | Joshua Ralston, Chief Financial Officer |
§ 10000.7 Place of business; service of process. ( a ) The principle place of business and offices of the agency are located at 230 South 500 East, Suite 230, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102-2045. All correspondence and requests for information or other materials should be submitted to the agency at this address.
( b ) The Executive Director is the agency official designated to accept service of process on behalf of the agency.
[60 FR 49446, Sept. 25, 1995, as amended at 81 FR 36181, June 6, 2016]
#### § 725.483 Costs in proceedings brought without reasonable grounds.

If a United States court having jurisdiction of proceedings regarding any claim or final decision and order, determines that the proceedings have been instituted or continued before such court without reasonable ground, the costs of such proceedings shall be assessed against the party who has so instituted or continued such proceedings.