alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Bernard, Allan & Edwards, Inc.
1016 Shore Acres Drive
Leesburg, Florida 34748

We  consent  to the use in this Report on Form 10KSB/A of our
report dated  March 15,  2002, as restated April 25, 2002
relating  to  the  financial statements of Bernard, Allan
& Edwards, Inc. and to the reference  of  our  firm  under
the  heading  "Experts."

/s/  Larry Legel  C.P.A.

Larry Legel,  C.P.A.
800 W. Cypress Creek Road
Wachovia Bank Building, Suite 470
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309

January 9,  2004
|   | EXHIBIT 32 |
|--------|------------|

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Bucyrus International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Timothy W. Sullivan, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Craig R. Mackus, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
| /s/T. W. Sullivan                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Timothy W. Sullivan

President and Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2005

 

 
| /s/C. R. Mackus                                      |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Craig R. Mackus

Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Secretary

August 12, 2005

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

 

----
November 2022

STORAGE COMPUTED* FROM JUDGE CLEAR CR. RELEASE - C.F.S.

 1000 ACRE -FEET INFLOW FRANCIS NATURAL TO CLEAR CR. TO SPRING EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. CARR PP FLOW SPILL OUTLET** CR. PP C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

219.4

1 1,202.96 219.1 -0.4 52 9 43 0 199 35 3 0.03 0.01

2 1,202.82 218.6 -0.4 23 9 14 0 199 35 3 0.03 0.43

3 1,202.65 218.1 -0.5 -24 9 -33 0 199 35 3 0.03 0.00

4 1,202.51 217.7 -0.4 24 18 6 0 199 35 4 0.04 0.00

5 1,202.43 217.4 -0.2 115 21 94 0 199 35 4 0.05 0.27

6 1,202.38 217.3 -0.2 153 22 131 0 191 35 4 0.05 0.27

7 1,202.27 217.0 -0.3 71 22 49 0 199 36 4 0.04 1.24

8 1,202.31 217.1 0.1 303 22 281 0 199 36 7 0.08 1.29

9 1,202.19 216.7 -0.4 54 22 32 0 199 35 4 0.04 0.23

10 1,202.08 216.4 -0.3 70 22 48 0 199 35 4 0.05 0.02

11 1,201.95 216.0 -0.4 40 22 18 0 199 36 4 0.05 0.02

12 1,201.84 215.7 -0.3 73 22 51 0 200 36 4 0.05 0.02

13 1,201.69 215.2 -0.5 7 22 -15 0 199 36 0 0.00 0.00

14 1,201.56 214.8 -0.4 41 22 19 0 200 35 4 0.04 0.00

15 1,201.42 214.4 -0.4 25 22 3 0 200 35 3 0.03 0.00

16 1,201.29 214.0 -0.4 42 22 20 0 200 35 5 0.06 0.00

17 1,201.14 213.5 -0.5 11 22 -11 0 199 35 5 0.06 0.00

18 1,201.00 213.1 -0.4 31 23 8 0 200 41 3 0.03 0.00

19 1,200.86 212.7 -0.4 35 23 12 0 200 42 4 0.05 0.00

20 1,200.71 212.3 -0.4 13 23 -10 0 200 35 4 0.05 0.00

21 1,200.57 211.8 -0.4 30 23 7 0 200 35 6 0.07 0.00

22 1,200.44 211.4 -0.4 43 23 20 0 200 34 6 0.07 0.00

23 1,200.31 211.1 -0.4 44 22 22 0 200 34 6 0.07 0.00

24 1,200.16 210.6 -0.4 8 23 -15 0 200 34 0 0.00 0.00

25 1,200.02 210.2 -0.4 34 23 11 0 200 34 11 0.13 0.00

26 1,199.88 209.8 -0.4 24 21 3 0 200 34 0 0.00 0.00

27 1,199.74 209.4 -0.4 31 22 9 0 200 41 0 0.00 0.00

28 1,199.49 208.6 -0.7 9 22 -13 0 201 174 9 0.10 0.00

29 1,199.34 208.2 -0.4 18 22 -4 0 201 41 0 0.00 0.00

30 1,199.21 207.8 -0.4 -22 22 -44 0 144 26 3 0.03 0.00

TOTALS -11.6 1,378 622 756 0 5,925 1,205 117 1.33 3.80

ACRE-FEET -11.6 2,733 1,234 1,500 0 11,752 2,390 232

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

** WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 2,390 Outlet 11,752

Spill 0

Total 14142.355

Precipitation

This month = 3.80

July 01, 2022 To date = 7.72

October 01, 2022 To date = 3.80

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Whiskeytown Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 12/1/2022
### §322a. Renewal of rights-of-way without consent of Pueblo Tribes; authority of Secretary; compensation, etc.

Notwithstanding such provisions, the Secretary of the Interior may, without the consent of the affected Pueblo Tribes, grant one renewal for a period not to exceed ten years of any right-of-way acquired through litigation initiated under the Act of May 10, 1926 (44 Stat. 498), or by compromise and settlement in such litigation, prior to January 1, 1975. The Secretary shall require, as compensation for the Pueblo involved, the fair market value, as determined by the Secretary, of the grant of such renewal. The Secretary may grant such right-of-way renewal under this section only in the event the owner of such existing right-of-way and the Pueblo Tribe involved cannot reach agreement on renewal within ninety days after such renewal is requested. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to validate or authorize the renewal of a right-of-way which is otherwise invalid by reason of the invalidity of the Act of May 10, 1926, on the date said right-of-way was originally obtained.

(Apr. 21, 1928, ch. 400, §2, as added Pub. L. 94–416, §3, Sept. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 1275.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Notwithstanding such provisions, referred to in text, means the provisions referred to in section 322 of this title.

Act of May 10, 1926, referred to in text, is act May 10, 1926, ch. 282, 44 Stat. 498, which was not classified to the Code.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Enforcement functions of Secretary or other official in Department of the Interior relating to compliance with rights-of-way across Indian lands, issued under section 321 et seq. of this title with respect to pre-construction, construction, and initial operation of transportation system for Canadian and Alaskan natural gas transferred to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, until first anniversary of date of initial operation of Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, see Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1979, §§102(e), 203(a), 44 F.R. 33663, 33666, 93 Stat. 1373, 1376, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, effective July 1, 1979, pursuant to Ex. Ord. No. 12142, §1–101, June 21, 1979, 44 F.R. 36927, set out as a note under section 719e of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. Office of Federal Inspector for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System abolished and functions and authority vested in Inspector transferred to Secretary of Energy by section 3012(b) of Pub. L. 102–486, set out as an Abolition of Office of Federal Inspector note under section 719e of Title 15. Functions and authority vested in Secretary of Energy subsequently transferred to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects by section 720d(f) of Title 15.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Micropaleontology of the Mesozoic rocks of northern 
Alaska

#### Professional Paper 302-D

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 6**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 7**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 8**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 9**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 10**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 11**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 12**                                
    (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp302D 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:20
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7630

DAVID HARRISON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; HENRY MCMASTER, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-03-1423-8-26-BI) Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: April 13, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: On August 19, 2004, this court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed David Harrison’s appeal of a district court order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Harrison v. South Carolina , No. 04-6489 (4th Cir. Aug. 19, 2004) (unpublished). Following the issuance of this court’s opinion, Harrison filed a motion for a certificate of appealability in the district court. The district court noted this court’s adjudication of Harrison’s appeal and denied the motion on October 18, 2004. The clerk of the district court then filed Harrison’s motion for a certificate of appealability as a notice of appeal and forwarded the record to this court. Harrison has filed an informal brief requesting a certificate of appealability. To the extent Harrison seeks a certificate of appealability, the court has previously considered this request and denied it. Accordingly, we decline to consider the request, as it is duplicative. To the extent Harrison’s motion could possibly be construed as a notice of appeal, such notice would clearly be untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 15, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-14981

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 02-00772-CR-01-CC-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

ASUNCION LOZANO-LOZA, 

a.k.a. Miguel Angel Ramirez, 

a.k.a. Asuncion Lopez, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(May 15, 2007)

Before ANDERSON, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Asuncion Lozano-Loza appeals his 70-month sentence for illegal reentry
2

into the United States. See 18 U.S.C. § 1326. When the district court calculated

the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range, it imposed an enhancement based on a

prior felony conviction reported in the Presentence Investigation Report. See

United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) (Nov. 2005). Lozano-Loza

argues that the enhancement is unconstitutional under United States v. Booker, 543

U.S. 220, 128 S. Ct. 738 (2005), because the prior conviction was not alleged in

the indictment or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm.

Because Lozano-Loza did not raise his objection before the district court, we

review for plain error. United States v. Raad, 406 F.3d 1322, 1323 (11th Cir.),

cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 126 S. Ct. 196 (2005). 

Lozano-Loza’s argument is foreclosed by controlling authority. The

Supreme Court held in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.

Ct. 1219 (1998), that “the government need not allege in its indictment and need

not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant had prior convictions for a

district court to use those convictions for purposes of enhancing a sentence.” 

United States v. Shelton, 400 F.3d 1325, 1329 (11th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation

marks omitted). As Lozano-Loza concedes, we have held that “[t]his conclusion

was left undisturbed by Apprendi, Blakely, and Booker.” Id. “Almendarez-Torres

remains the law until the Supreme Court determines that Almendarez-Torres is not
3

controlling precedent.” United States v. Orduno-Mireles, 405 F.3d 960, 963 (11th

Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

Even if Almendarez-Torres were not controlling precedent, we would

conclude that there was no error because Lozano-Loza admitted to the existence of

his prior felony conviction. The conviction was reported as fact in the PSI, and

Lozano-Loza raised no objection. See Shelton, 400 F.3d at 1330 (facts alleged in

the PSI and not challenged by defendant are deemed admitted).

Lozano-Loza’s sentence is

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,189.99

 1,189.88

 1,189.77

 1,189.66

 1,189.54

 1,189.42

 1,189.33

 1,189.24

 1,189.14

 1,189.04

 1,188.94

 1,188.85

 1,188.78

 1,188.69

 1,188.61

 1,188.49

 1,188.38

 1,188.28

 1,188.17

 1,188.22

 1,189.21

 1,190.04

 1,190.98

 1,191.91

 1,192.57

 1,192.32

 1,192.06

 1,192.55

 1,193.15

 1,193.53

 181.5

 181.2

 180.9

 180.6

 180.3

 179.9

 179.7

 179.4

 179.2

 178.9

 178.6

 178.4

 178.2

 177.9

 177.7

 177.4

 177.1

 176.8

 176.5

 176.7

 179.4

 181.6

 184.2

 186.8

 188.6

 187.9

 187.2

 188.6

 190.3

 191.3

STORAGE

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.2

-0.2

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.3

+0.1

+2.7

+2.3

+2.6

+2.6

+1.8

-0.7

-0.7

+1.4

+1.7

+1.1

CHANGE

-23

-10

-9

-9

-23

-37

-19

-22

-34

-37

-36

-21

9

-23

-8

-29

-38

-10

-22

352

1,756

1,545

1,712

1,702

1,341

64

42

1,094

1,257

941

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 34

 0

 0

 0

 140

 250

 253

 257

 250

 260

 265

 257

 250

 256

 248

PP

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 140

 140

 140

 140

 140

 124

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 110

 125

 125

 140

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

 150

OUTLETS

 3

 1

 3

 2

 2

 4

 5

 2

 4

 1

 1

 2

 4

 0

 1

 1

 2

 1

 3

 4

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .04

 .01

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .06

 .03

 .05

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .05

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .02

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 WHISKEYTOWN LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 19, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAP.

C.F.S. * FRANCIS

COMPUTED

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +9.8 11,405 3,824 0 2,720 59 .70

ACRE-FEET +9.8 22,622 7,585 0 5,395 117

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 5,395

SPILL 0 12,980

 181.8

OUTLET 7,585

TOTAL

JUDGE

CARR PP

(1)

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 371

 1,638

 1,485

 1,660

 1,652

 1,252

 0

 0

 1,075

 1,099

 901

 11,133

 22,082

FROM

TO

SPRING CR.

TO CLEAR CR

CLEAR

CR.

NATURAL

FLOW

-23

-10

-9

-9

-23

-37

-19

-22

-34

-37

-36

-21

 9

-23

-8

-29

-38

-10

-22

-19

 118

 60

 52

 50

 89

 64

 42

 19

 158

 40

 272

 540

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .33

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .27

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .75

 .09

 1.47

PRECIP

INCHES

PRECIPITATION

 1.47

 9.49

THIS MONTH

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE
#### § 3275.21 May BLM order me to drill and produce wells on my lease?

BLM may order you to drill and produce wells on your lease when we find it necessary to protect Federal interests, prevent drainage, or ensure that lease development and production occur in accordance with sound operating practices.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,251.27

 2,251.06

 2,251.02

 2,250.96

 2,250.87

 2,250.78

 2,250.72

 2,250.65

 2,250.51

 2,250.27

 2,250.16

 2,250.06

 2,250.03

 2,250.19

 2,250.50

 2,250.76

 2,250.95

 2,251.06

 2,251.10

 2,251.17

 2,251.19

 2,251.20

 2,251.16

 2,251.30

 2,251.57

 2,252.34

 2,253.17

 2,253.73

 2,254.74

 2,257.21

 2,258.52

 966.1

 964.3

 964.0

 963.4

 962.7

 961.9

 961.4

 960.8

 959.5

 957.5

 956.5

 955.7

 955.4

 956.8

 959.5

 961.7

 963.4

 964.3

 964.7

 965.3

 965.4

 965.5

 965.2

 966.4

 968.7

 975.5

 982.7

 987.7

 996.6

 1,018.7

 1,030.5

STORAGE

-3.2

-1.8

-0.3

-0.5

-0.8

-0.8

-0.5

-0.6

-1.2

-2.1

-1.0

-0.9

-0.3

+1.4

+2.7

+2.2

+1.6

+1.0

+0.3

+0.6

+0.2

+0.1

-0.3

+1.2

+2.3

+6.7

+7.3

+4.9

+8.9

+22.1

+11.8

CHANGE

-107

27

203

93

78

103

241

171

194

96

136

30

249

1,194

1,680

1,632

1,158

838

501

566

406

380

398

1,188

1,824

3,937

4,062

2,713

4,745

11,415

6,259

INFLOW

 1,487

 920

 342

 355

 429

 472

 472

 456

 759

 1,104

 569

 433

 355

 476

 329

 481

 317

 344

 316

 239

 315

 318

 537

 554

 632

 551

 379

 219

 236

 279

 286

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 28

 28

 36

 0

 41

 23

 31

 20

 46

 38

 46

 33

 25

 20

 0

 18

 13

 13

 10

 20

 3

 18

 36

 20

 8

 0

 16

 8

 5

 3

 0

C.F.S.

 .11

 .11

 .14

 .00

 .16

 .09

 .12

 .08

 .18

 .15

 .18

 .13

 .10

 .08

 .00

 .07

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .08

 .01

 .07

 .14

 .08

 .03

 .00

 .06

 .03

 .02

 .01

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .30

 .16

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.44

 .06

 .86

 .48

 .26

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.10

 .06

 .32

 .63

 .67

 .45

 .77

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2016 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 7, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +61.0 46,410 14,961 0 0 606 2.37 7.56

ACRE-FEET +61,000 92,054 29,675 0 0 1,202

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 29,675

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 29,675

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 7.56

JULY 1, 2016 7.56

 969.4

Table 4

(1) (1)

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 7.56
#### § 16.5 Bonds.

The applicant shall be required to submit a bond in such amount and in such form as the Secretary may prescribe to secure the faithful performance of the terms of any agreement made.

[29 FR 9383, July 9, 1964. Redesignated at 30 FR 9218, July 23, 1965]
### §881a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–401, §2, Sept. 16, 1970, 84 Stat. 838, which related to payments to minor members of the Potawatomi Indians and members under legal disability, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3282.2 When must the unit operator have a participating area approved?

You must have an established BLM-approved participating area to allocate production and royalties before beginning commercial operations under a unit agreement to allocate production within the unit.
### §722. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 23, 1954, ch. 831, §2, 68 Stat. 769, which related to proclamation declaring termination of Federal trust upon conveyance of lands to the State of Texas, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of Emmis Communications Corporation (the Company),
that, to his knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended
February 29, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: May 14, 2004 /s/ JEFFREY H. SMULYANJeffrey H. SmulyanChairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer