alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I n c o r p o r a t i o n b y R e f e r e n c e D o c k e t I D N o
. E P A

- HQ

- O AR

- 2010

- 096 4

D ece m b e r 10 , 2010

T h e c o n t e n t s o f t h e f

o l l o w i n g d o c k e t s a r e h e r e b y i n c o r po r a t e d b y r e f e r e n c e i n t o a n d a r e

c o n s i d e r e d t o b e i n c l ud e d i n , c o n t a i n e d i n a n d t o h a v e b e e n p l ace d i n D o c k e t E P A

- HQ

- O A R2010

- 0964 ( C a ll f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n ) :

1) E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2009

- 0924 ( C o n f i d e n t i a l B u s i n e ss I n f

o r m a t i o n ) 2) E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2010

- 0929 ( C h a n g e t o t h e R e p o r t i n g D a t e f

o r I npu t s t o E qu a

t i o n s )

A c c e ss i n g d o c k e t s :

P ub l i c l y a v a il a b l e d o c k e t m a t e r i a l s a r e a v a i l a b l e e i t h e r e l e c t r o n i c a ll y t h r o ug h

www

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g ov o r i n h a r d c o p y a t E P A ’ s D o c k e t C e n t e r , P ub li c R ea d i ng R oo m , E P A W e s t B u il d i ng , R o o m 3334

, 1301 C o n s t i t u t i o n A v e n u e , N W

, Wa s h i ng t o n , D C 2000 4

. T h i s D o c k e t F a c il i t y i s o p e n f

r o m 8 : 30 a

. m

. t o 4 : 3 0 p

. m ., M o n d a y t h r o ug h F r i d a y , e x c l

u d i ng l e g a l h o li d a y s

. T h e t e l e p h o n e n u m

b e r f o r t h e P ub li c R e a d i n g R o o m i s ( 202 ) 566

- 1744

, a n d t h e t e l e p h o n e

n u m b e r f o r t h e A i r D o c k e t i s ( 202 ) 566

- 174 2

.
### Drill hole data for coal beds in the Powder River Basin, Montana and Wyoming

#### Data Series 713

- By:
-  Jon E. Haacke  and  David C. Scott 

Tweet

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**
- Document:  **Document**
- Companion File:  **Companion Files**
- Read Me:  **Read Me**
- Download citation as:   RIS

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

#### Additional publication details

- Publication type:
- Report
- Publication Subtype:
- USGS Numbered Series
- Title:
- Drill hole data for coal beds in the Powder River Basin, Montana and Wyoming
- Series title:
- Data Series
- Series number:
- 713
- Year Published:
- 2013
- Language:
- English
- Publisher:
- U.S. Geological Survey
- Publisher location:
- Reston, VA
- Contributing office(s):
- Central Energy Resources Science Center
- Description:
- Report: iv, 15 p.; Downloads Directory; Readme
- Country:
- United States
- State:
- Montana;Wyoming
- Online Only (Y/N):
- Y
- Additional Online Files (Y/N):
- Y

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found here.
§ 3173.10 Form 3160-5, Sundry Notices and Reports on Wells. ( a ) The operator must submit a Form 3160-5, Sundry Notices and Reports on Wells (Sundry Notice) for the following: ( 1 ) Site facility diagrams (see § 3173.11);
( 2 ) Request for an FMP number (see § 3173.12);
( 3 ) Request for FMP amendments (see § 3173.13(b));
( 4 ) Requests for approval of off-lease measurement (see § 3173.23);
( 5 ) Request to amend an approval of off-lease measurement (see § 3173.23(k));
( 6 ) Requests for approval of CAAs (see § 3173.15); and
( 7 ) Request to modify a CAA (see § 3173.18).
( b ) The operator must submit all Sundry Notices electronically to the BLM office having jurisdiction over the lease, unit, or CA using WIS, unless the submitter: ( 1 ) Is a small business, as defined by the U.S. Small Business Administration; and
( 2 ) Does not have access to the Internet.
|EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Kevin J. Wiersma, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        |                           
|----------------------- | --------------------------
|Dated:   August 9, 2005 | By:   /s/ Kevin J. Wiersma
|                        | Kevin J. Wiersma          
|                        | Chief Financial Officer   

|33
|--
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 378

 405

 404

 397

 408

 411

 417

 443

 478

 525

 571

 622

 679

 680

 705

 717

 718

 716

 717

 721

 730

 729

 727

 726

 728

 732

 736

 741

 738

 735

 363

 377

 396

 382

 391

 396

 398

 405

 441

 478

 528

 549

 621

 671

 666

 706

 634

 692

 690

 699

 688

 714

 678

 719

 714

 718

 710

 727

 723

 707

 370

 394

 400

 389

 400

 402

 406

 421

 459

 501

 547

 591

 644

 676

 681

 709

 700

 704

 705

 711

 713

 722

 719

 723

 720

 724

 719

 734

 729

 724

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 4, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 16,996

 16,707

 16,423

 16,132

 15,867

 15,631

 15,397

 15,153

 14,918

 14,742

 14,613

 14,540

 14,576

 14,641

 14,684

 14,718

 14,842

 15,022

 15,207

 15,357

 15,521

 15,670

 15,829

 16,016

 16,214

 16,503

 16,888

 17,283

 17,668

 18,037

 567

 557

 547

 538

 529

 521

 513

 505

 497

 491

 487

 485

 486

 488

 489

 491

 495

 501

 507

 512

 517

 522

 528

 534

 540

 550

 563

 576

 589

 601

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 2310.1-4 Cancellation of withdrawal applications or withdrawal proposals and denial of applications. ( a ) Withdrawal or extension applications and proposals shall be amended promptly to cancel the application or proposal, in whole or in part, with respect to any lands which the applicant, in the case of applications, or the office, in the case of proposals, determines are no longer needed in connection with a requested or proposed action. The filing of a cancellation notice in each such case shall result in the termination of the segregation of the public lands that are to be eliminated from the withdrawal application or withdrawal proposal. (See § 2310.2-1 of this title)
( b ) The Secretary may deny an application if the costs (as defined in section 304(b) of the Act (43 U.S.C. 1734(b)) estimated to be incurred by the Department of the Interior would, in the judgment of the Secretary, be excessive in relation to available funds appropriated for processing applications requesting a discretionary withdrawal, or a modification or extension of a withdrawal.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 508.64

 508.84

 508.25

 508.95

 508.56

 507.00

 507.50

 507.42

 507.20

 507.85

 507.85

 508.43

 508.67

 508.87

 508.64

 508.71

 508.21

 508.18

 507.97

 506.08

 505.52

 505.54

 505.52

 505.60

 505.54

 505.47

 505.52

 505.43

 505.33

 505.23

 65,277

 65,523

 64,797

 65,658

 65,178

 63,277

 63,883

 63,786

 63,519

 64,307

 64,307

 65,018

 65,314

 65,560

 65,277

 65,363

 64,748

 64,711

 64,453

 62,179

 61,519

 61,542

 61,519

 61,613

 61,542

 61,460

 61,519

 61,413

 61,295

 61,177

STORAGE

-381

+246

-726

+861

-480

-1,901

+606

-97

-267

+788

+0

+711

+296

+246

-283

+86

-615

-37

-258

-2,274

-660

+23

-23

+94

-71

-82

+59

-106

-118

-118

CHANGE

2,512

2,800

2,250

3,061

1,985

745

2,044

1,671

1,568

2,503

2,584

2,893

2,618

2,651

2,313

2,509

2,160

2,482

2,540

1,616

2,434

2,765

2,726

2,800

2,707

2,637

2,656

2,549

2,532

2,532

INFLOW

 1,894

 1,891

 1,891

 1,890

 1,861

 1,683

 1,723

 1,720

 1,692

 1,810

 1,904

 1,907

 1,906

 1,984

 1,895

 1,895

 1,895

 1,892

 1,887

 1,883

 1,888

 1,869

 1,869

 1,871

 1,870

 1,866

 1,867

 1,869

 1,869

 1,868

POWER

 695

 644

 594

 592

 274

 0

 0

 0

 0

 229

 586

 547

 497

 445

 401

 400

 399

 455

 680

 771

 749

 743

 742

 747

 745

 675

 648

 653

 650

 649

SPILL

 99

 123

 119

 131

 79

 0

 0

 0

 0

 58

 81

 66

 55

 85

 148

 165

 165

 142

 90

 96

 118

 132

 119

 121

 115

 123

 99

 70

 61

 64

OUTLET

 16

 18

 12

 14

 13

 20

 15

 0

 11

 9

 13

 15

 11

 13

 12

 6

 11

 12

 13

 12

 12

 9

 8

 14

 13

 14

 12

 10

 11

 10

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2006 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/20/2006

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -4,481 71,843 55,809 15,210 2,724 359

ACRE-FEET -4,481 142,501 110,697 30,169 5,403 712

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 110,697

SPILL 30,169 146,269

 65,658

OUTLET 5,403

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,468

 2,711

 2,198

 2,962

 1,927

 783

 2,014

 1,680

 1,567

 2,447

 2,477

 2,739

 2,513

 2,497

 2,220

 2,414

 2,062

 2,382

 2,458

 1,634

 2,352

 2,700

 2,665

 2,737

 2,642

 2,599

 2,589

 2,483

 2,461

 2,453

 69,834

 138,516

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5146-5147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7617-2]


EPA Public Meeting: Market Enhancement Opportunities for Water-
Efficient Products; Notice of Change in Meeting Location

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is hosting a one-day 
public meeting to discuss market enhancement opportunities for water-
efficient products. EPA's goal is to bring together stakeholders from 
Federal, state and local governments; utilities; manufacturers; 
building trade associations; consumer groups; and other interested 
parties to exchange information and views on promoting water-efficient 
products in the marketplace. The focus of the February meeting will be 
on landscape irrigation products. The first meeting was held in 
Washington, DC on October 9, 2003 and

[[Page 5147]]

the second was held in Austin, TX on January 15, 2004. One additional 
public meeting will be held in Seattle, WA in April; notice will be 
provided on a location and time when available.
    The meeting will consist of several panel discussions, and is open 
to the public. The audience will have an opportunity to ask questions 
and provide comments at the conclusion of the meeting.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. on February 17, 2004.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Wyndham Phoenix, 50 East 
Adams Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information on this meeting, 
please see EPA's Water Efficiency Web Page at www.epa.gov/owm/water-efficiency/index.htm. To register online from the Water Efficiency 
Program page, click on the registration form link. You may also 
register by contacting ERG, Inc. by phone (781-674-7374), or by 
downloading the registration form and sending the completed form to ERG 
via fax at 781-674-2906 or mail to ERG, Conference Registration, 110 
Hartwell Avenue, Lexington, MA 02421-3136. Seating is limited, 
therefore please register or request special accommodations no later 
than February 10, 2004.

    Dated: January 23, 2004.
James A. Hanlon,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. 04-2155 Filed 2-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
NO. 07-05-0430-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D JULY 10, 2006

______________________________ LORENZO KEITH LASALLE, Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 47 TH DISTRIC T COURT O F POTT ER COUNTY; NO. 35,213-A; HON. HAL MINER, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Memorandum Opinion

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS an d CAMPBELL, JJ. Lore nzo Keith LaSalle (appe llant) appeal s from an order deny ing him postconvicti on DNA testin g. Via a s ingle is sue, he contends t hat the trial court abused i ts discretion so ordering. W e overrule the issue and aff irm the order. Appellant’s requestfor testing and aff idavit attached thereto were deficien t in severa l respects. Fir

st, w hile n umerous

itemswere seized by the police and remain in the custody
o f the State, appellant did and has not identifie d the evidence he wants test ed. Tha t2

omission proved fa t al in Dinkins v. State, 84 S.W .3d 639, 642 (Tex. Crim. App. 20 02). Appellant has g iven us no r eason to devi ate from the holding in Dinkins

. Second, one requesting DNAtesting mustalso establi sh by a pre ponderance of the evidence that there is

a reasonable pr

obability that he would not h ave been pros ecuted or convicted if exculpator

y results had been ob tained throug h DNA testi ng. Id. at 642-43. Appellant’s “evide nce” purp ortin g to sa tisf y t his burd en consisted of his opinio n that “I believe that

if the court w ill order

DNA testin g on the origi nal specimens taken from both the alleged victim to this offense and the spe cimen taken from me, ( or any other evidence in the State’s possession subject to DNA testing) , that a DNA test wil l prove my innocence.” This conclusory utterance or his “belief” falls short of being evidence s ufficient to create a reasonable prob abil ity th at he would have neither been pr osecuted or conv icted had DNA testing been favorable. Nor doeshis“be lief” tend to negate the pletho ra of the inculpatory evidence presented against him at trial. This evidence consisted of, a mong other things, 1) his own statement that he enter ed th e victim’s abode and struck her at the tim e in question, 2) the discovery of his shoe prints outside the victim’s house , and 3) the disc overy, in appellant’s house, of clothing matching that of the person wh o assaulted the vic tim. Third, DNA

testing w

as conducted by

the Federal Bu reau of Investi gation on various specimensobtained from the victim and appellan t, contrary to appellant’s representati on. The testing pr

oved inconcl usive. Whythat result would not be obtained if additi onal testing was underta ken goes unex plained by a ppellant.3

The foregoing c ircumstances preclude us from ho lding that t he trial court erred in ordering that appellant’s request for DNA testin g be denied. C onsequently , we affirm that order.

Per Curiam
Do not publish

.
!

!

 ̈§¦25

 ̈§¦90

 ̈§¦90

 ̈§¦80

Hot Springs

Yellowstone

National Park

Washakie

Sheridan

Goshen

Niobrara

Weston

Laramie

Big Horn

Platte

Uinta

Converse

Crook

Johnson

Teton

Campbell

Lincoln

Sublette

Albany

Natrona

Sweetwater Carbon

Fremont

Park

Casper

Cheyenne

Greater Sage-grouse

Map 4-16

Cumulative Impact Analysis Area (CIAA)

Pinedale Planning Area

SageGrouse_CIAA

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

0 10 20 40 60 80 100

Miles

0 15 30 60 90 120 150

Kilometers

Wyoming

Data Source: Wyoming Game and Fish Department
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-069;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
#### § 3162.2-13 If I acquire an interest in a lease that is being drained, will the Department assess me for compensatory royalty?

If you acquire an interest in a Federal or Indian lease through an assignment of record title or transfer of operating rights under this part, you are liable for all drainage obligations accruing on and after the date we approve the assignment or transfer.

[66 FR 1894, Jan. 10, 2001]
#### § 2.283 If I serve a subpoena *duces tecum,* must I also submit a *Touhy* request?

Yes. If you serve a subpoena for employee testimony, you also must submit a request under *United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Regan,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951)? If you serve a subpoena *duces tecum* for records in the possession of the Department, you also must submit a *Touhy* Request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 103

 103

 103

 100

 97

 97

 95

 94

 98

 100

 100

 97

 95

 96

 95

 92

 91

 89

 88

 89

 89

 88

 91

 94

 96

 95

 96

 98

 104

 106

 108

 101

 100

 99

 97

 95

 94

 92

 92

 92

 98

 97

 93

 93

 94

 90

 90

 89

 87

 86

 87

 87

 87

 87

 89

 93

 93

 94

 96

 98

 104

 105

 102

 101

 100

 98

 96

 96

 94

 93

 95

 99

 99

 95

 94

 95

 93

 91

 90

 88

 87

 88

 88

 87

 89

 91

 94

 94

 95

 97

 100

 105

 106

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 3,801

 3,739

 3,677

 3,623

 3,580

 3,554

 3,499

 3,439

 3,395

 3,375

 3,348

 3,306

 3,263

 3,221

 3,173

 3,122

 3,073

 3,027

 2,990

 2,958

 2,926

 2,899

 2,878

 2,861

 2,850

 2,841

 2,835

 2,832

 2,831

 2,834

 2,838

 127

 125

 123

 121

 119

 118

 117

 115

 113

 113

 112

 110

 109

 107

 106

 104

 102

 101

 100

 99

 98

 97

 96

 95

 95

 95

 95

 94

 94

 94

 95

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 660

 653

 681

 723

 724

 740

 741

 745

 762

 766

 772

 770

 803

 816

 825

 834

 843

 853

 845

 859

 856

 883

 898

 934

 946

 916

 995

 997

 975

 622

 606

 602

 681

 705

 723

 727

 711

 681

 732

 719

 758

 732

 695

 635

 821

 828

 829

 821

 827

 831

 840

 881

 887

 917

 909

 913

 964

 915

 640

 632

 636

 707

 720

 728

 736

 734

 738

 758

 764

 763

 765

 777

 774

 826

 835

 841

 835

 844

 843

 854

 892

 908

 937

 912

 954

 977

 935

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 13, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 20,928

 20,797

 20,667

 20,620

 20,580

 20,562

 20,541

 20,485

 20,439

 20,451

 20,504

 20,569

 20,640

 20,721

 20,774

 20,865

 21,010

 21,184

 21,340

 21,523

 21,743

 21,978

 22,271

 22,558

 22,831

 23,081

 23,368

 23,687

 23,922

 698

 693

 689

 687

 686

 685

 685

 683

 681

 682

 683

 686

 688

 691

 692

 696

 700

 706

 711

 717

 725

 733

 742

 752

 761

 769

 779

 790

 797

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER