alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MANDATORY SERVICE BULLETIN SB 14-09 

Quest Aircraft Company, LLC 

1200 Turbine Drive

Sandpoint, ID 83864

Page 1 of 1

KODIAK

EFFECTIVITY:

Elevator Serial Numbers 0001 thru 0149

SUMMARY:

Quest Aircraft received one report of cracks forming in the trailing edge skin of the elevator on the lower inboard 

corner, near the leading edge skin and torque tube. QUEST® has determined that the area must be inspected on 

every aircraft as specifi ed below, and doublers installed. The attached Field Service Instruction provides 

procedures for inspecting for cracking of the inboard upper and lower skins of the elevator and installation of 

doublers to repair existing cracking or prevent cracks from occurring.

COMPLIANCE:

This Service Bulletin must be complied with prior to the elevator Time In Service (TIS) reaching 1500 hours or within the 

next 25 hours TIS, whichever occurs later. 

Elevator assemblies that have previously complied with revision 00 need not comply with revision 01 of this bulletin.

ATTACHED DOCUMENTS:

Document #: Document Title:

FSI-106 Elevator Doubler Installation

FAA APPROVAL STATUS:

The resultant alteration to the affected aircraft described in the instructions attached has been shown to comply 

with the applicable Federal Aviation Regulations and is approved by the Federal Aviation Administration.

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:

Any deviations from the Service Bulletin or the accompanying Field Service Instructions must be coordinated with 

Quest Aircraft and approved by the FAA. The FAA is considering issuing an Airworthiness Directive to address this 

issue.

CREDIT AND WARRANTY INFORMATION:

QUEST® will supply one Service Kit FSI-106 per aircraft at no cost to owner, and for aircraft under factory warranty, 

reimburse up to 4 hours of labor costs associated with FSI-106. Contact QUEST Customer Service to order Kit, 

and refer to the QUEST® website for information on submitting invoices for labor reimbursement.

Quest Customer Service 

Service Bulletin SB14-09

Phone: (208)263-1111 Toll Free: 1(866)263-1112

Email: Customerservice@questaircraft.com

NUMBER: SB 14-09

REVISION: 01

DATE: 12/11/2014

 SUBJECT: ELEVATOR DOUBLER INSTALLATION

*MANDATORY ANDATORYSERVICE BULLETIN* SERVICE BULLETIN*

QUEST® and KODIAK® are registered trademarks of Quest Aircraft Design, LLC

*MANDATORY SERVICE BULLETIN*

*MANDATORY SERVICE BULLETIN*

EFFECTIVITY

SUBJECT: ELEVATOR DOUBLER INSTALLATION

DATE: 12/11/2014

SUBJECT ELEVATOR DOUBLER INSTALLATION
#### § 3162.2-14 May I appeal BLM's decision to require drainage protective measures?

You may appeal any BLM decision requiring you take drainage protective measures. You may request BLM State Director review under 43 CFR 3165.3 and/or appeal to the Interior Board of Land Appeals under 43 CFR part 4 and subpart 1840.

[66 FR 1894, Jan. 10, 2001]
### §§188, 189. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §1(49), (50), 65 Stat. 703

Section 188, R.S. §2122, related to sale of buildings belonging to United States.

Section 189, R.S. §2123, related to sale of lands with buildings.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of RF Industries, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Howard F. Hill, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:   September 14, 2005                              /s/ Howard F. Hill
                                                        ------------------
                                                         Howard F. Hill
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to RF Industries, Ltd. and will be
retained by RF Industries, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# Data Store

### Integrated Resource Management Applications

### Part of IRMA

National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the InteriorNatural Resource Stewardship and Science

          -  Home              -  IRMA Portal 
          -  Search              -  Quick 
            -  Advanced 
            -  By Reference Code 
          -  Reports 
Contact UsHelp

Log Out

## Published Report - (Code: 2230267)

TitleFort Sumter Historic Structure ReportDescriptionFort Sumter Historic Structure Report consist of three volumes (I,II and III)  Volume II consists of appendices A-F and volume III, consists of appendices G-HFull CitationJoseph K. Oppermann Architect, P.A.. 2015. Fort Sumter Historic Structure Report. Historic Structure Report. Winston Salem, NCVisibilityPublicCurrently restricted to reference owner(s) until reference is set to active

US Department of the InteriorFOIAPrivacy PolicyDisclaimer and OwnershipNPS HomeUSA.govAccessibility

 

FOSU_HSR_Volume II_2015.pdf
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 520.56

 520.83

 521.71

 522.51

 523.25

 524.06

 525.00

 525.37

 525.88

 526.58

 527.15

 527.78

 528.68

 529.52

 530.46

 531.13

 531.85

 532.65

 533.46

 534.27

 535.02

 535.79

 536.55

 537.33

 538.08

 538.83

 539.22

 539.45

 1,749,761

 1,753,022

 1,763,664

 1,773,358

 1,782,342

 1,792,193

 1,803,648

 1,808,164

 1,814,396

 1,822,961

 1,829,945

 1,837,675

 1,848,739

 1,859,085

 1,870,687

 1,878,971

 1,887,888

 1,897,813

 1,907,880

 1,917,966

 1,927,321

 1,936,942

 1,946,455

 1,956,235

 1,965,654

 1,975,089

 1,980,002

 1,982,901

STORAGE

+121

+3,261

+10,642

+9,694

+8,984

+9,851

+11,455

+4,516

+6,232

+8,565

+6,984

+7,730

+11,064

+10,346

+11,602

+8,284

+8,917

+9,925

+10,067

+10,086

+9,355

+9,621

+9,513

+9,780

+9,419

+9,435

+4,913

+2,899

CHANGE

0

1,756

5,641

4,445

4,541

5,291

6,443

2,290

3,325

3,511

3,839

3,811

5,880

4,755

5,768

4,335

4,977

5,517

5,411

5,370

5,370

5,370

5,354

5,312

5,303

5,280

2,639

1,758

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 42

 45

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 18

 22

 19

 19

 22

 21

 20

 21

 21

 20

 20

 15

 23

 70

 76

 67

 91

 77

 64

 55

 80

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

+103

-67

-229

+489

+35

-278

-621

+5

-161

+825

-299

+108

-281

+480

+102

-137

-461

-493

-321

-262

-583

-443

-491

-291

-477

-459

-107

-216

OR

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 16

 32

 20

 51

 4

 71

 20

 0

 28

 20

 48

 44

 44

 40

 60

 36

 81

 41

 53

 33

 61

 49

 49

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .08

 .05

 .13

 .01

 .18

 .05

 .00

 .07

 .05

 .12

 .11

 .11

 .10

 .15

 .09

 .20

 .10

 .13

 .08

 .15

 .12

 .12

INCHES

 .00

 .63

 .17

 .38

 .49

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .43

 .41

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .17

 .38

 .27

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR March 22, 2019

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2019 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +233,261 123,292 0 1,158 0 -4,530 901 2.24 3.59

ACRE-FEET +233,261 244,550 0 2,297 0 -8,985 1,787

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

PACHECO TUNNEL 2,297 TOTAL 2,297

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2018 TO DATE = 8.24

 1,749,640

SPILL 0 3.59

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 8.24
### PART II—PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS

Sec.
507.
Termination of private foundation status.
508.
Special rules with respect to section 501(c)(3) organizations.
509.
Private foundation defined.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1969**—Pub. L. 91–172, title I, §101(a), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 492, added part heading and analysis for part II.
§ 2931.1 What are the purposes of these regulations? The regulations in this part— ( a ) State when you need a permit to use public lands and waters for recreation, including recreation-related business;
( b ) Tell you how to obtain the permit;
( c ) State the fees you must pay to obtain the permit; and
( d ) Establish the framework for BLM's administration of your permit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000737561
<NAME>                        Louise Bryant
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                                 0
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,789,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                     768,073
<INVENTORY>                                      544,396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,571,146
<PP&E>                                         4,468,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,219,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                23,234,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,411,586
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         304,230
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,037,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  23,234,120
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              16,692,563
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 15,809,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 874,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 502,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               555,960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,050,761)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,051,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,051,319)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.17)
        


</TABLE>
### §799. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–281, §1(b)(1), May 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 246

Section, act Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 843, §9, 70 Stat. 895, provided for protection by Secretary of minors, etc., prior to transfers or removal of restrictions on property.
#### Max Becker, Respondent, *v.*M. Arno Beir, Appellant. Dorothy Becker, Respondent, *v.*M. Arno Beir, Appellant.

Fourth Department,

May 4, 1949.

*Thomas W. Sullivan*for appellant.

*Cyril L. Kendall*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The defendant’s car made a sudden stop and was struck from the rear by a car owned and driven by the plaintiff Max Becker, resulting in damage to plaintiff’s car. The plaintiff Dorothy Becker was a passenger in the car driven by Max Becker and alleges that she was injured by reason of the collision.

The defendant testified that a dog stepped into the path of his car and that he stopped his car in order to avoid hitting the dog.

*147The jury in the City Court of Rochester rendered a verdict of no cause of action in each case. Upon appeal to the County Court, the judgments in favor of defendant and the order in each case denying plaintiff’s motion to set the verdict aside and for a new trial were reversed and a new trial granted. The County Court held that ‘1 no emergency was created by the dog which justified the abrupt stopping of his automobile by the defendant ”. The County Court further concluded that *‘1*Assuming that the red warning light was automatically lighted by the application of defendant’s brakes, that such a light was not *‘*an adequate mechanical signal device ’ as is provided for in Section 83, subdivision 1 [of the Vehicle and Traffic Law] ”.

Whether or not the defendant was confronted with an emergency within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 83 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law was a question of fact for the jury. *(Raolaslovic*v. *New York Central R. R. Co.,*245 N. Y. 91, 100; *Lewis*v. *Long Island R. R. Co.,*162 N. Y. 52; Restatement, Torts, § 296; *Burhans*v. *Burhans,*159 Md. 370; *Massie*v. *Barker,*224 Mass. 420.) Except in an emergency, the statute required the defendant before stopping to *“*give warning, either by holding his arm straight out horizontal and at right angles to the vehicle, or by operating an adequate mechanical signal device. ’ ’ Defendant did not hold out his arm but contends that he operated an adequate mechanical signal device when he applied the brakes to stop his car. His car was equipped with two stop lights on the rear thereof which operated from the foot brake. He testified that these lights were in perfect working order when inspected immediately after the accident. Whether or not, defendant violated subdivision 1 of section 83 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law was a question of fact for the jury.

The jury’s verdict in favor of the defendant in each case was not, in our opinion, either contrary to or against the weight of evidence. The order of the County Court should be reversed on the law and facts, with costs in this court and in the Monroe County Court and the judgment and order of the City Court in each case should be affirmed.

All concur. Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.

In each case: Order of the Monroe County Court reversed on the law and facts, with costs in this court and in the Monroe County Court and judgment and order of Rochester City Court affirmed.
§ 3473.3-1 Rentals. ( a ) The annual rental per acre or fraction thereof on any lease issued or readjusted after the promulgation of this subpart shall not be less than $3. The amount of the rental will be specified in the lease.
( b ) Until a lease issued before August 4, 1976, is readjusted, the rental paid for any year shall be credited against the royalties for that year.
( c ) On leases issued or readjusted after August 4, 1976, rental payments shall not be credited against royalties.
( d ) Rentals paid for any lease year commencing prior to the effective date of the first lease readjustment occurring after August 4, 1976, shall be credited against royalties for that year. Rentals due and payable for any lease year commencing on or after the effective date of the readjustment shall not be credited against royalties.
[44 FR 42643, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33150, July 30, 1982]
### §504. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 504 was editorially reclassified as section 5204 of this title.
Exhibit 31.2


I, Jaren Chan Eng Ann, CEO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Myoffiz, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to
us by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.






   June 8, 2004                 /s/    Jaren Chan Eng Ann
                                  --------------------
                                  Jaren Chan Eng Ann
                                  Chief Executive Officer
(No. 791

Claimant awarded $650.24.)

#### Inland Iron Works Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Franchise *tax*— refund *may be awarded.*The court may award claimant the amount of the franchise tax erroneously paid, although no legal liability exists against the State, such award may be made on ground of social justice and equity.

John T. Booz, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Edward C. Fitch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for the refund of franchise taxes wrongfully paid to the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois, in the years 1921 and 1923, in the total sum of $650.24.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois is, as a matter of law, sustained.

On the grounds of equity and social justice, we award claimant the sum of $650.24.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 522

 528

 537

 518

 514

 503

 466

 460

 444

 469

 460

 473

 422

 425

 413

 446

 465

 473

 462

 485

 472

 466

 471

 458

 455

 461

 455

 440

 441

 468

 415

 489

 502

 478

 474

 464

 409

 433

 422

 412

 413

 417

 407

 381

 364

 401

 420

 437

 428

 444

 443

 446

 406

 407

 421

 442

 412

 421

 419

 397

 451

 508

 523

 498

 498

 482

 437

 446

 432

 434

 431

 445

 416

 405

 382

 421

 441

 461

 446

 466

 459

 454

 444

 431

 435

 450

 434

 431

 430

 437

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 13,979

 14,096

 14,234

 14,352

 14,480

 14,594

 14,654

 14,729

 14,777

 14,834

 14,904

 14,983

 14,980

 14,922

 14,790

 14,657

 14,526

 14,457

 14,317

 14,178

 14,050

 13,962

 13,875

 13,790

 13,684

 13,589

 13,491

 13,430

 13,419

 13,428

 466

 470

 474

 478

 483

 486

 488

 491

 493

 494

 497

 499

 499

 497

 493

 489

 484

 482

 477

 473

 468

 465

 463

 460

 456

 453

 450

 448

 447

 448

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Annual Report of First National Power Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter Wanner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Peter Wanner Peter Wanner, CEO, CFO and PAO Dated: September 23, 2008
#### William W. Kelley, Respondent, v. The Farmers and Citizens Co-operative Market, Inc., Appellant.

Judgement and order of the County Court of Dutchess county affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.