alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 31 
          - [TD 7374] 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Correcting amendment. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains corrections to (TD 7374) which was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Thursday, July 24, 1975 (40 FR 30946) relating to Federal Insurance Contribution Act taxes (FICA).                     

# DATES:

This correction is effective July 24, 1975. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Warren Joseph at (202) 622-4920 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The final regulations (TD 7374) that are the subject of this correction is under section 6413(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. 

## Need for Correction 

As published, TD 7374, contains an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification. 

# List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 31

      - Employment taxes
      - Income taxes
      - Penalties
      - Pensions
      - Railroad retirement
      - Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
      - Social Security
      - Unemployment compensation

## Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, 26 CFR Part 31 is corrected by making the following correcting amendment: 

# PART 31—EMPLOYMENT TAXES AND COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX AT SOURCE 

**Paragraph 1.**                         The authority citation for part 31 continues to read in part as follows:                     

Authority:26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * 

§ 31.6413(c)-1 

**Par. 2.**                         Section 31.6413(c)-1(a)(1)(i) is amended by removing the language “§ 1.21-2” and adding the language “§ 1.31-2” in its place.                     

Cynthia E. Grigsby, 

Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedures and Administration). 

[FR Doc. 04-21613 Filed 9-24-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 1882.0-5 Definitions. As used in this subpart, the term: ( a ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of the Interior.
( b ) *Director* means the Director, Bureau of Land Management.
( c ) *Act* means the Act of February 25, 1920, as amended (30 U.S.C. 181).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFactors Affecting Inlet-Engine Compatibility During Aircraft Departures at High Angle of Attack for an F/A -18A AircraftThe F404-GE-400 engine powered F/A- 18A High Alpha Research Vehicle (HARV) was used to examine the quality of inlet airflow during departed flight maneuvers, that is, during flight outside the normal maneuvering envelope where control surfaces have little or no effectiveness. A series of six nose-left and six nose-right departures were initiated at Mach numbers between 0.3 and 0.4 at an altitude of 35 kft. The yaw rates at departure recovery were in the range of 40 to 90 degrees per second. Engine surges were encountered during three of the nose-left and one of the nose-right departures. Time-variant inlet-total-pressure distortion levels at the engine face were determined to not significantly exceed those measured at maximum angle-of-attack and - sideslip maneuvers during controlled flight. Surges as a result of inlet distortion levels were anticipated to initiate in the fan. Analysis revealed that the surges initiated in the compressor and were the result of a combination of high levels of inlet distortion and rapid changes in aircraft motion. These rapid changes in aircraft motion are indicative of a combination of engine mount and gyroscopic loads being applied to the engine structure that impact the aerodynamic stability of the compressor through changes in the rotor-to-case clearances.Document ID19990024943Acquisition SourceArmstrong Flight Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSteenken, W. G.*(General Electric Co. Cincinnati, OH United States)*Williams, J. G.*(General Electric Co. Cincinnati, OH United States)*Yuhas, A. J.*(Analytical Services and Materials, Inc. Edwards, CA United States)*Walsh, K. R.*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1999Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:206572H-2327NASA/TM-1999-206572Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-26617PROJECT: RTOP 529-31-04-00-37Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990024943.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Kruger, Brett (OST) - ^.iljmil^Qr 

From: David M. Endersbee [dmendersbee@zsrlaw.com] ~ i'^l:-in i(^,' •^''> 

Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:19 PM • -1 '-'iLiiAFiOlvS 

To: Kruger, Brett (OST) 

Cc: Richard D. Mathias •^? M'P ; C: Q i.r-^ 

Subject: AlitaliaCityLinerS.p.A./Docl<etOST-2012-0038 ' " ' ' ^ " V _• 

Dear Brett, 

This is to confirm that Alitalia CityLiner S.p.A. ("CityLiner") seeks exemption authority and a statement of authorization 

only to the extent necessary to display Delta's DL* code on CityLiner's flights (operated on behalf of Alitalia) within the 

EU and between the EU and third countries. CityLiner does not itself intend to engage in foreign air transportation 

between the EU and the U.S. 

Sincerely, 

David M. Endersbee 

Associate 

Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, L.L.P. 

888 Seventeenth Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Tel: 202-973-7935 

Fax: 202-342-0683 

Cell: 571-271-7616 

dmendersbee@zsrlaw.com 

www.zsrlaw.com/dme 

- Visit our new website - www.zsriaw.com -
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Reclamation Information Sharing Environment (RISE)
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Central Valley Project Cost Allocation Study
            - Contacts

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP) Cost Allocation Study                  - About the Study
                - Past Discussions
                - Comments and Responses
                - Online Request Form
                - Contacts  Programs & Activities  Projects & Facilities  Doing Business with Reclamation  Public Affairs  Employment  Recreation  Site Index  Contact Us 

## Contacts

Central Valley Project Cost Allocation Study

----

**Steve Pavich**, Economist Division of Financial Management 916-978-5363 (TTY 800-877-8339)

**Lisa Navarro,** Public Affairs Specialist	 916-978-5111

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Last Updated: 7/6/22*

## More Information about the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

          - 
          - 
          - 
          - 
          - 
          - 
          - 
          - 

          - Contact Us
          - Site Index
          - Accessibility
          - Disclaimer
          - DOI
          - FOIA
          - No Fear Act
          - Notices
          - Privacy Policy
          - Quality of Information
          - Recreation.gov
          - USA.gov
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2004 / Presidential Documents 56663

Proclamation 7817 of September 17, 2004

Citizenship Day and Constitution Week, 2004

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation

Two hundred and seventeen years ago this week, delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia signed one of the most enduring documents in history: the Constitution of the United States. Our Constitution 

is the foundation of our liberty and has guaranteed the rights of our people 

through a history of tremendous change and progress. 

Today, we marvel at the wisdom of the Framers who toiled through a 

long summer of learned and contentious debates. Their work produced 

a document that upholds high ideals, while answering the most practical 

questions of governance. The charter they crafted—with its separate branches 

of Government, enumerated powers, checks and balances, and later the 

specific protections provided by our Bill of Rights—guides our Nation and 

inspires others around the world. 

During Constitution Week, our Nation reflects on the significance of our 

Constitution and gives thanks for the blessings of liberty that this document 

helps to secure. We honor the men and women who have supported and 

defended it throughout our history, at times with their lives. On Citizenship 

Day, we reaffirm our commitment to freedom, to ensuring that our history 

endures, and to instilling in America’s next generation the values that make 

our country great. 

In remembrance of the signing of the Constitution and in recognition of 

the Americans who strive to uphold the duties and responsibilities of citizenship, the Congress, by joint resolution of February 29, 1952 (36 U.S.C. 

106, as amended), designated September 17 as ‘‘Citizenship Day,’’ and by 

joint resolution of August 2, 1956 (36 U.S.C. 108, as amended), requested 

that the President proclaim the week beginning September 17 and ending 

September 23 of each year as ‘‘Constitution Week.’’

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim September 17, 2004, as Citizenship Day, 

and September 17 through September 23, 2004, as Constitution Week. I 

encourage Federal, State, and local officials, as well as leaders of civic, 

social, and educational organizations, to conduct ceremonies and programs 

that celebrate our Constitution and reaffirm our rights and obligations as 

citizens of our great Nation.

56664 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2004 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventeenth 

day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of 

the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and 

Billing code 3195

Filed 9

[FR Doc. 04

–20–04; 11:00 am] 

–21354

–01–P 

twenty-ninth.

W
§ 3142.5 Definitions. As used in this subpart, the term: *Production in paying quantities for combined hydrocarbon leases* means: ( 1 ) Production, in compliance with an approved plan of operations and by nonconventional methods, of oil and gas which can be marketed; or
( 2 ) Production of oil or gas by conventional methods as the term is currently used in 43 CFR part 3160.
*Production in paying quantities for oil and gas leases* means production of oil or gas by conventional methods that meets the definition of “production in paying quantities” in 43 CFR 3160.0-5.
*Production in paying quantities for tar sand leases* means production of shale oil quantities that provide a positive return after all costs of production have been met, including the amortized costs of the capital investment.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSurvey of Quantitative Research Metrics to Assess Pilot Performance in Upset RecoveryAccidents attributable to in-flight loss of control are the primary cause for fatal commercial jet accidents worldwide. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) conducted a literature review to determine and identify the quantitative standards for assessing upset recovery performance. This review contains current recovery procedures for both military and commercial aviation and includes the metrics researchers use to assess aircraft recovery performance. Metrics include time to first input, recognition time and recovery time and whether that input was correct or incorrect. Other metrics included are: the state of the autopilot and autothrottle, control wheel/sidestick movement resulting in pitch and roll, and inputs to the throttle and rudder. In addition, airplane state measures, such as roll reversals, altitude loss/gain, maximum vertical speed, maximum/minimum air speed, maximum bank angle and maximum g loading are reviewed as well.Document ID20160006310Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLe Vie, Lisa R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 17, 2016Publication DateApril 1, 2016Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219191L-20572NF1676L-21763Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 284848.02.50.07Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160006310.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 508.01

 507.96

 507.89

 507.78

 507.83

 507.49

 508.10

 508.10

 507.95

 507.94

 508.22

 508.02

 507.45

 507.83

 508.23

 508.83

 509.50

 509.51

 507.91

 507.43

 507.35

 507.33

 507.40

 507.59

 507.74

 507.54

 507.41

 507.34

 507.26

 507.17

 507.26

 64,501

 64,441

 64,356

 64,222

 64,283

 63,871

 64,612

 64,612

 64,428

 64,416

 64,760

 64,514

 63,822

 64,283

 64,772

 65,511

 66,344

 66,356

 64,380

 63,798

 63,701

 63,677

 63,762

 63,992

 64,174

 63,931

 63,774

 63,689

 63,592

 63,483

 63,592

STORAGE

-259

-60

-85

-134

+61

-412

+741

+0

-184

-12

+344

-246

-692

+461

+489

+739

+833

+12

-1,976

-582

-97

-24

+85

+230

+182

-243

-157

-85

-97

-109

+109

CHANGE

1,185

1,240

1,204

1,230

1,337

1,039

1,594

1,232

1,101

1,114

1,255

988

805

1,386

1,407

1,572

1,506

1,025

8

716

1,000

1,089

1,048

1,058

1,037

849

891

958

985

994

1,071

INFLOW

 1,300

 1,252

 1,231

 1,282

 1,295

 1,234

 1,208

 1,220

 1,182

 1,067

 1,067

 1,096

 1,139

 1,137

 1,145

 1,181

 1,067

 1,000

 986

 992

 1,035

 1,087

 990

 929

 930

 956

 952

 985

 1,018

 1,035

 1,003

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 35

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 16

 18

 16

 16

 11

 13

 12

 12

 12

 18

 15

 16

 15

 17

 15

 18

 19

 19

 18

 17

 14

 14

 15

 13

 15

 16

 18

 16

 16

 14

 13

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2015 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 09/01/2015

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,168 33,924 34,001 0 35 477

ACRE-FEET -1,168 67,288 67,441 0 69 946

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 67,441

SPILL 0 67,510

 64,760

OUTLET 69

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,191

 1,249

 1,206

 1,225

 1,351

 1,066

 1,574

 1,335

 1,126

 1,144

 1,239

 1,023

 798

 1,384

 1,405

 1,586

 1,496

 1,025

 16

 725

 1,008

 1,105

 1,051

 1,061

 1,046

 855

 896

 1,022

 1,128

 1,141

 1,186

 34,663

 68,754

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
#### Louis Heidenheimer, Appellant, *v.*David Mayer, Respondent.

(Argued May 31, 1878;

decided June 11, 1878.)

*Lewis Saunders*for appellant.

*A. R. Dyett*for respondent.

Agree to affirm. No opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
Filed 1/8/15 Kwak v. Golden Crown Dental Lab CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

JOHN J. KWAK,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

GOLDEN CROWN DENTAL LAB, INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents. B253558

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC465932)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Supe rior Court of Los Angeles County. Barbara A. Meiers, Judge. Dismissed.

Baird A. Brown for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Law Offices of Chanho C. Joo, Fra nk E. Marchetti and Chanho C. Joo for Defendants and Respondents.

* * * * * *Plaintiff and appellant John J. Kwak ap peals from a trial court order sustaining the

demurrer of defendants Glen Kim and Golden Crown Dental Lab, Inc. without leave to amend. It is elementary that “[a]n order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is

not an appealable order; only a judgment entere d on such an order can be appealed.” ( I.J. Weinrot & Son, Inc. v. Jackson (1985) 40 Cal.3d 327, 331; Co de Civ. Proc., § 904.1.) We recognize that appellate courts do fre quently “save” such erroneous appeals by treating them as being from a subsequently en tered judgment of dismissal. (See, e.g., Bame v. City of Del Mar (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 1346, 13 53, fn. 5.) However, in the present case no judgment of dismissal ha s yet been entered. “[T]he ultimate responsibility rests with the appealing party; pl aintiff could have requested the trial court to compel defendant to prepar e the judgment or requested permission to prepare and file the judgment himself to perfect his appeal rights.” ( Jordan v. Malone (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 18, 21.) Because no appealable orde r or judgment has been entere d in this case, the appeal is premature and, on this court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed.

DISPOSITION The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

GOODMAN, J. 

We concur:

MOSK, Acting P.J.

KRIEGLER, J.

 Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ron Hadani, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Vision-Sciences, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thereport;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a)         Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)        Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)         Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)         All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)        Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|   |                    |   | /s/ Ron Hadani |   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|----------------|--------|--------|
| Dated: | August 14, 2003         |   | Ron Hadani     |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

1

----
#### Irving Rosenbaum, Respondent, v. Brown Chevrolet, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.