alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 21

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

 Central Valley Project - California

Monthly Diversions in AF 2011

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

CANALS

Contra Costa 766 796 307 4616 8205 8771 10804 13496 9969 8435 17962 16009 100136

Delta-Mendota 243186 168225 183249 131545 102072 206016 256824 255562 245945 245364 197985 239464 2475437

Actual Fed Dos Amigos 42155 81641 75872 89972 136016 183078 215800 168738 83289 48607 39905 43352 1208425

Madera 7720 6325 8743 44504 48915 50399 66574 56363 31569 19962 0 0 341074

Friant-Kern 17691 83765 110366 117445 205552 203636 250034 212094 157359 108892 37143 24542 1528519

Corning 0 161 0 575 1783 2436 4112 4312 2932 559 200 186 17256

Folsom-South 1902 2075 1565 2081 2315 2380 2604 2505 2648 2501 1755 1476 25807

Tehama-Colusa 3832 2749 849 12942 33293 40908 53271 41346 21664 5173 4947 2803 223777

CACHUMA PROJECT

Tecolete Tunnel 1623 1359 1547 2802 3370 2447 2787 2816 2473 2298 1772 1765 27059

ORLAND PROJECT

Stony Creek 0 0 0 5859 9761 NA 16997 NA 13210 3771 0 0 49598

North Canal 0 0 0 1771 3120 NA 4881 NA 3735 960 0 0 14467

South Canal 0 0 0 4088 6641 NA 12116 NA 9475 2811 0 0 35131

SOLANO PROJECT

Putah South Canal 3729 3346 3465 11853 24637 25236 36669 34257 21241 6081 2065 2906 175485
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[CC Docket Nos. 96-262, 91-213; DA 04-2997]


Reconsideration of Price Cap Carrier Reallocation of General 
Support Facilities Costs

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice; termination of proceedings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document is a notification of final termination of the 
petitions for reconsideration of a 1997 Commission order regarding the 
reallocation of costs of general purpose computers and other general 
support facilities to the billing and collection account for incumbent 
local exchange carriers subject to price cap regulation. The petitions 
for reconsideration have been withdrawn by the petitioners. No 
oppositions to the prior notice of termination were received; 
therefore, interested parties are hereby notified that this proceeding 
has been terminated.

DATES: This proceeding was terminated effective September 9, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer McKee, Wireline Competition 
Bureau, Pricing Policy Division, (202) 418-1530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 22, 2004, the Wireline Competition 
Bureau's Pricing Policy Division issued a Public Notice in the Access 
Charge Reform Third Report and Order reconsideration proceeding stating 
that the proceeding would be terminated effective 30 days after 
publication of the Public Notice in the Federal Register, unless the 
Bureau received oppositions to the termination before that date. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on August 10, 2004. See 69 
FR 48492, August 10, 2004. The Bureau did not receive any oppositions 
to the termination of this proceeding within 30 days of Federal 
Register publication of the notices; therefore, this proceeding was 
terminated as of September 9, 2004.

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 152, 153, 154, 155, 303; 44 FR 18501, 67 FR 
13223, 47 CFR 0.291, 1.749.

Federal Communications Commission.
Jeffrey J. Carlisle,
Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau.
[FR Doc. 04-21732 Filed 9-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Morgan
Products Form 10-Q as of April 3, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such Form 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                           1,603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                       928
<INVENTORY>                                     77,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,666
<PP&E>                                          30,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,729
<BONDS>                                        102,634
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,413
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,123)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,653
<SALES>                                        165,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               165,414
<CGS>                                          142,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (792)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   176
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,124)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,154)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,154)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
Due to the file size of the CALPUFF visibility modeling files, they are not available from the electronic

docket. These files are available upon request.

Please email your request to: Michael Feldman (feldman.michael@epa.gov) or call 214

‐ 665

‐ 9793.

Thank you
Reporting Year 201 3 data



### Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program

– Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems ( Subpart W ) Analysis: Onshore Production Storage Tanks

Definition and Reporting Requirements for Onshore Production Storage Tanks : Reporters are required to c alculate and report annual CH 4 , CO 2 and N 2 O ( N 2 O only reported when flared) emissions from atmospheric pressure fixed roof storage tanks receiving hydrocarbon produced liquids from onshore petroleum and natural gas production facilities (including stationary liqui d storage not owned or operated by the reporter)

.

Coverage and Aggregation

- level : Onshore petroleum and natural gas production facilities that emit greater than 25,000 metric tons CO 2 equivalent ( MTCO 2 e ) (for all covered emissions sources) 1 are required t o report their storage tank emissions based on the methodologies specified in 40 CFR Part 98, Subpart W

. S torage tanks data for onshore production is reported at the s ub

- basin (county and formation type) level. Formation types include oil, high permeability gas, shale gas, coal seam, and other tight reservoir rock. 2

Subpart W Counts of Crude Oil and Condensate Storage Tanks :

Total tanks on well pads for 2013 Reporting Year = 212,565

Subpart W reports include d ata separated for tanks on well pads versus tanks off well pads, and for tanks
with separator s or wells 10 bpd or greater , and with separators or wells under 10 bpd.

Data reported for tanks on well pads, with separators or wells 10 bpd or greater (92,231 tanks ) include
information that allow calculation of percentage of controls. For these tanks, 55,270 (60%) reported
controls ( vapor recover units or flaring). Of these controlled tanks, 94% controlled with flaring, and 6%

controlled with VRUs.

Subpart W 2013 Data for Tanks on Well Pads, ≥ 10 bpd

# of tanks % of total tanks

Total Tanks 92,231 100%

Controlled Tanks 55,270 60%

VRU 3,476 4% (6% of controlled tanks)

Flare 51,794 56% (94% of controlled tanks)

Uncontrolled Tanks 36,961 40%

1 Onshore petroleum and natural gas production means all equipment on a single well

- pad or associated with a single well

- pad (including

but not limited to compressors, generators, dehydrators, storage vessels, and portable non

- self

- propelled equipment which includes well drilling and completion equipment, workover equipment, gravity separation equipment, auxiliary non

- transportation

- related equipment,

and le ased, rented or contracted equipment) used in the production, extraction, recovery, lifting, stabilization, separation or tre ating of petroleum and/or natural gas (including condensate). This equipment also includes associated storage or measurement vessel s and all enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations using CO 2 or natural gas injection, and all petroleum and natural gas production equipment located on islands, artificial islands, or structures connected by a causeway to land, an island, or an artificial i sland.

2 More details on Subpart W available at

- http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text

idx?c=ecfr&sid=9d44ffd9f6d4df77924e55e96c1a446a&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40cfr98_main_02.tpl
Table 27
                                          U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                                 Central Valley Operations Office

                                                 Tehama-Colusa Canal
                                                        2003

Monthly Deliveries in AF

     Water Users        Jan    Feb    Mar    Apr    May    Jun    Jul    Aug    Sep    Oct    Nov    Dec  Total

Colusa County WD          73    120   1053   2479   5279  12355  13246   7332   4143   3779    792         50651
Cortina WD                 0      0      0     37    100    272    278     96     44     52     16           895
Davis WD                   0      2     17    339    126    401    598    426     97     28      0          2034
Dunnigan WD                8     22    133    455   1334   3237   3495   1970   1283    476     26         12439
4-M Water District         0      3      7     85    225    305    406    273    230     23      1          1558
GCID                       0     43    960   2135   3319   4905   4810   4844   3200   1218    277         25711
Glenn Valley WD            0      0      0      0     32     73    177    119     16      0      0           417
Glide WD                   0      8      9    269   2498   3177   4123   2532    575    331      0         13522
Holthouse WD               0      7     24    109    329    403    549    384    204     96      2          2107
Kanawha WD                 3     27    146    737   2470   7036   7815   4865   1983    729     47         25858
Kirkwood WD                0      0      0      0     36    111    132    113     68     51      0           511
La Grande WD               0      0      0    624   1247   1427   1291   1001     56    323     41          6010
Myers-Marsh MWC            0      0     25     47    149    261    154      0      0      0      0           636
Orland-Artois WD          14    120     29    518   6581  13098  15059   9912   5194   2730    109         53364
Westside WD                0     40    453   2326   4180   9425   8327   5463   1766    826    124         32930

Total                     98    392   2856  10160  27905  56486  60460  39330  18859  10662   1435      0 228643


Data supplied by Willows Field Division, Water and Land Division
### §753. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1207, §13, 68 Stat. 1103, which related to protection of property rights of minors, persons non compos mentis and other members needing assistance, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3281.5 What happens if BLM receives applications that include overlapping unit areas? ( a ) If BLM receives unit area applications that include overlapping lands, we will request that each prospective unit operator resolve the issue with the other operator(s). If the prospective operators cannot reach a resolution, BLM may: ( 1 ) Return all unit applications and request all applicants to revise their proposed unit areas;
( 2 ) Designate any unit area proposal that is geologically appropriate for unitization and best meets public interest requirements; or
( 3 ) Designate a different area for unitization when doing so is in the public interest.
( b ) BLM will reject either an application or a portion of an application that includes lands already in an approved unit area.
### §983h. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–484, §10, Oct. 31, 1990, 104 Stat. 1169; Pub. L. 102–497, §2, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3255, which related to the establishment of an economic development plan for the tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofMichaels Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for theperiod ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officersof the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’sknowledge:

 

1.               The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  August 27,  2010 | /s/  John B. Menzer                                                                                 |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | John  B. Menzer                                                                                     |
|                                   | Chief  Executive Officer                                                                            |
|                                   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                                                                      |
|                                   |                                                                                                |
|                                   | /s/  Richard S. Jablonski                                                                           |
|                                   | Richard  S. Jablonski                                                                               |
|                                   | Vice  President — Financial Planning and Analysis and Interim Controller                       |
|                                   | (Principal  Accounting Officer — performing the functions of the Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separatedisclosure document.

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John
MacDonald, certify, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Blast
Energy Services, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Blast Energy Services, Inc.





Date:
April 7, 2008





By:
            /s/
      John MacDonaldJohn
      MacDonald,
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Accounting Officer)
### §491. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 491 was editorially reclassified as section 5140 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000740628
<NAME> INTERFERON SCIENCES RESEARCH PARTNERS, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6605

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SATISH R. SHAH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR92-255-HAR, CA-97-2887-CCB) Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Satish R. Shah, Appellant Pro Se. Gary Patrick Jordan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Raymond Allen Bonner, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Satish R. Shah seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999),and his motions for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Shah , Nos. CR-92-255-HAR; CA-97-2887- CCB (D. Md. Feb. 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §458. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458 was editorially reclassified as section 5351 of this title.
### §941. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–116, §2, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1118, which set out declaration of policy, Congressional findings, and purpose of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 103–116, §17, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1138, which generally provided that the provisions of Pub. L. 103–116 were to become effective upon the transfer of the Existing Reservation to the Secretary, was editorially reclassified and is set out as a note under former section 931 of this title.

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 103–116, §1, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1118, provided that Pub. L. 103–116, enacting this subchapter and provisions set out as a note under section 931 of this title and repealing subchapter XLIII (§931 et seq.) of this chapter, could be cited as the "Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina Land Claims Settlement Act of 1993".
#### In the Matter of Nathaniel Copeland, Appellant, against Frieda S. Miller, as Industrial Commissioner and Head of the Department of Labor of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Albany County Special Term, denying motion for issuance of a commission to take testimony of a witness in the United States military service now located in Germany by written interrogatories. The court was justified ie *989its denial of the motion. Order denying the application unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. j,, Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Bus-sell, JJ.