alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Apr 18 2014 01:07PM HP Fax page 1 

RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West 

COMMENT SHEET 

Central Valley Project Cost Allocation Study (CVP-CAS) 

Comments ^re welcome throughout the duration of the cost allocation effort. 

Please mail 

MP-730, Sacramento 

comments to Brooke Miller-Levy, Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, 

CA 95825, or e-mail them to bmillBrlevy@usbr.gov, or fax them to 916-978-5094. 

For questions, please contact Ms. Miller-Levy at 916-978-5296 (TTY 916-978-5608). 

(Please print clearly) 

This personal data will be used temporarily and will not be permanently stored. 

Name 

Organization and Address 

Phone (^67 ^'^^^K'T) FAX E-mail l7t]i>il1Sg>^<g SgCV«(.»Aftf 

Comment here: 

PUas.^ <kdi^ (L 

tec. 11^ . :i6 

Date 

W. Mttr or?^tr^«^rs, 

All comments become part of the public record.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**CALLISTO
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**


**FORM
      10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I
      am the
      Chief Executive Officer of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection
      with
      the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 and filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K").





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
      in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March
                31, 2006
            
            /s/ Gary
              S.
              JacobGary
                S. Jacob
              Chief
                Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23



                           DARILEK, BUTLER & CO., P.C.
                         2702 N Loop 1604 East Suite 202
                            San Antonio, Texas 78232
                               210-979-0055 phone
                                210-979-0058 fax
               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to (a) the inclusion, in the Annual Report of Direct Wireless
Communications, Inc. on Form 10-KSB, of our report dated February 27, 2004,
relating to the financial statements of Direct Wireless Communications, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2003 and the period from inception (April 6, 2001)
to December 31, 2003.

"Darilek, Butler & Co., P.C."

San Antonio, Texas
February 27, 2004
§ 3273.11 When is a site license unnecessary? You do not need a site license if your facility will be located: ( a ) On private land or on split estate land where the United States does not own the surface; or
( b ) On Federal land not leased for geothermal resources. In this situation, the Federal surface management agency will issue you the permit you need.
#### Frank C. Kohart, Respondent, *v.*Edward J. Skou, Appellant.

Contract— *restraint of trade*— *account stated.*

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 6th day of October, 1913, in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 3d day of October, 1913, denying his motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

The agreement in suit is an arrangement by two dealers fixing the prices for sales of similar articles, by which they would end a losing and disastrous competition. It is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, because it did not appear that these parties controlled the supply, that the arranged price was excessive, or that any monoply was thereby created. Neither was the agreement illegal, or against public policy, because the subject-matter was fixtures to be used by schools and public buildings, since it is not shown that there were not other competitors, or that the board of education or the city of New York had any cause to complain. As to the terms and basis for mutual payments between the contracting parties, the written agreement is clear and unambiguous; and the amounts and balance between the respective payments were set forth in the first cause of action. This left no proper basis for the erroneous computation alleged as the second cause of action. If the evidence showed an account stated, it was for the $683.90, for which sum plaintiff testified a bill had been rendered to the defendant, about the middle of February, which statement had been retained without objection. This proof was inconsistent with any later “account stated” by rendering a further bill for $841.40. The verdict being based on the second cause of action, therefore, is unsupported by the pleadings or by the proofs. The judgment and order should, therefore, be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within twenty days the plaintiff stipulate that the verdict be reduced to $683.90, with interest on that sum from February 14, 1908, in which event the judgment, as so modified, and order are affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within twenty days plaintiff stipulate that the verdict be reduced to $683.90, with interest thereon from February 14,1908, in which event the judgment, as so modified, and the order are affirmed, without costs of this appeal.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amendment #2 of the Annual Report of Intelligent Living, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Victoria Rudman., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1557-DR]


Pennsylvania; Amendment No. 1 To Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (FEMA-1557-DR), dated September 
19, 2004, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 21, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is hereby amended to include the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of September 19, 2004:

    Blair, Bucks, Cameron, Carbon, Greene, Huntingdon, and Lehigh 
Counties for Individual Assistance.
    Blair, Bucks, Cameron, Carbon, Greene, Huntingdon, and Lehigh 
Counties for debris removal and emergency protective measures 
(Categories A & B) under the Public Assistance program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-22080 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
**Exhibit 31.4**
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Walter Z. Berger, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Emmis OperatingCompany; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004 /s/ WALTER Z. BERGERWalter Z. BergerExecutive Vice President, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer
#### § 2933.31 What rules must I follow at fee areas?

You must comply with all rules that BLM posts in the area. Any such site-specific rules supplement the general rules of conduct contained in subpart 8365 of this chapter relating to public safety, resource protection, and visitor comfort.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 16, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00774

- CV

IN RE CHENEGA SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Ju stice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice

On December 9, 2015

, relator Chenega Support Services, LLC filed a petition for writ of

mandamus and motion for temporary emergency stay pending a ruling on the mandamus

pe tition. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that

relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary emergency stay are DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on December 16, 2015

.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of December, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015

- CI

- 13340, styled American Hospital Services Group, LLC v. Dependable Health Services, Inc.; Dependable American Hospital Services, LLC; and Amegy Bank National

Association , pending in the 37th Judicial Distri ct Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Martha B. Tanner presiding.
§ 663.430 Under what circumstances may mechanisms other than ITA's be used to provide training services? ( a ) Contracts for services may be used instead of ITA's only when one of the following three exceptions applies: ( 1 ) When the services provided are on-the-job training (OJT) or customized training;
( 2 ) When the Local Board determines that there are an insufficient number of eligible providers in the local area to accomplish the purpose of a system of ITA's. The Local Plan must describe the process to be used in selecting the providers under a contract for services. This process must include a public comment period for interested providers of at least 30 days;
( 3 ) When the Local Board determines that there is a training services program of demonstrated effectiveness offered in the area by a community-based organization (CBO) or another private organization to serve special participant populations that face multiple barriers to employment, as described in paragraph (b) in this section. The Local Board must develop criteria to be used in determining demonstrated effectiveness, particularly as it applies to the special participant population to be served. The criteria may include: ( i ) Financial stability of the organization;
( ii ) Demonstrated performance in the delivery of services to hard to serve participant populations through such means as program completion rate; attainment of the skills, certificates or degrees the program is designed to provide; placement after training in unsubsidized employment; and retention in employment; and
( iii ) How the specific program relates to the workforce investment needs identified in the local plan.
( b ) Under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, special participant populations that face multiple barriers to employment are populations of low-income individuals that are included in one or more of the following categories: ( 1 ) Individuals with substantial language or cultural barriers;
( 2 ) Offenders;
( 3 ) Homeless individuals; and
( 4 ) Other hard-to-serve populations as defined by the Governor.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Stephan Kuppenheimer, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


Date:  March 29, 2005                            /s/ Stephan Kuppenheimer
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                 President
### SUBCHAPTER III—APPOINTMENTS
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 of the Small Business 
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Horizon Ventures Fund II, L.P. 
(``Licensee''), 4 Main Street, Suite 50, Los Altos, CA 94022, an SBIC 
Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended 
(``the Act''), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has 
sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and Sec.  107.730, 
Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest, of the Small 
Business Administration (``SBA'') rules and regulations (13 CFR 107.730 
(2004)). Horizon Ventures Fund II, L.P. proposes to provide equity 
financing to Invivodata, Inc., 5815 Scotts Valley Drive, Suite 150, 
Scotts Valley, CA 95066. The financing is contemplated for growth, 
modernization, working capital and business expansion.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Section 
107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Horizon Ventures Fund I, L.P. 
and Horizon Ventures Advisors Fund I, L.P., Associates of the Licensee 
currently own greater than 10 percent of Invivodata, Inc., and 
therefore Invivodata, Inc. is considered an Associate of the Licensee 
as defined in Sec.  107.50 of the Regulations.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: September 23, 2004.
Jeffrey D. Pierson,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 04-21997 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 927

 917

 951

 990

 1,000

 992

 922

 939

 923

 920

 883

 913

 914

 866

 782

 866

 866

 788

 809

 843

 961

 952

 869

 884

 888

 872

 895

 886

 896

 888

 889

 904

 898

 919

 946

 989

 931

 892

 914

 863

 888

 840

 848

 892

 758

 716

 784

 766

 705

 737

 804

 824

 830

 828

 865

 851

 843

 861

 860

 877

 860

 862

 911

 907

 939

 968

 994

 958

 906

 923

 886

 910

 851

 882

 905

 800

 747

 826

 822

 753

 761

 823

 886

 880

 850

 874

 867

 857

 878

 873

 888

 876

 876

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 18, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 24,175

 24,442

 24,749

 25,081

 25,368

 25,606

 25,784

 25,971

 26,123

 26,295

 26,388

 26,506

 26,648

 26,683

 26,653

 26,705

 26,701

 26,619

 26,539

 26,527

 26,569

 26,606

 26,602

 26,584

 26,543

 26,463

 26,429

 26,348

 26,259

 26,201

 26,166

 806

 815

 825

 836

 846

 854

 859

 866

 871

 877

 880

 884

 888

 889

 888

 890

 890

 887

 885

 884

 886

 887

 887

 886

 885

 882

 881

 878

 875

 873

 872

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 3213.14 Will BLM terminate my lease if I do not pay my rent on time? ( a ) If MMS does not receive your second and subsequent year's rental payment in full by the lease anniversary date, MMS will notify you that the rent payment is overdue. You have 45 days after the anniversary date to pay the rent plus a 10 percent late fee. If MMS does not receive your rental plus the late fee by the end of the 45-day period, BLM will terminate your lease.
( b ) If you receive notification from MMS under paragraph (a) of this section more than 15 days after the lease anniversary date, BLM will reinstate a lease that was terminated under paragraph (a) of this section if MMS receives the rent plus a 10 percent late fee within 30 days after you receive the notification.