Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 28, 2004 / Notices 57975

V. Program: Role of Museums and 

Libraries in Serving Diverse 

Communities 

Dr. Robert S. Martin, Director IMLS 

Mr. Edwin Rigaud, President, 

National Underground Railroad and 

Freedom Center, Cincinnati, OH 

and member National Museum and 

Library Services Board 

Ms. Alyce Sadongei (Kiowa/Tohono 

O’Odham), Assistant Curator for 

Native American Relations, Arizona 

State Museum, University of 

Arizona 

Ms. Susan Kent, Director and Chief 

Executive of The Branch Libraries, 

New York Public Library 

VI. Other Business 

VII. Adjourn

ADDRESSES: The Hotel Washington, 515 

15th Street, NW., Washington, DC, (202) 

638–5900.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Lyons, Special Assistant to the 

Director, Institute of Museum and 

Library Services, 1100 Pennsylvania 

Avenue, NW., Room 510, Washington, 

DC 20506, (202) 606–4649.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

National Museum and Library Services 

Board is established under the Museum 

and Library Services Act, 20 U.S.C. 

Section 9101 et seq. The Board advises 

the Director of the Institute on general 

policies with respect to the duties, 

powers, and authorities related to 

Museum and Library Services. 

The executive session from 9 a.m. to 

10:30 a.m. on Thursday, October 7, 2004 

will be closed pursuant to subsections 

(c)(4) and (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 

5, United States Code because the Board 

will consider information that may 

disclose: Trade secrets and commercial 

or financial information obtained from a 

person and privileged or confidential; 

and information of a personal nature the 

disclosure of which would constitute a 

clearly unwarranted invasion of 

personal privacy. The meetings from 11 

a.m. until 12:30 p.m. on Thursday, 

October 7, 2004 and the meeting from 9 

a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on Friday, October 8, 

2004 are open to the public. If you need 

special accommodations due to a 

disability, please contact: Institute of 

Museum and Library Services, 1100 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20506, (202) 606–8536, 

TDD (202) 606–8636 at least seven (7) 

days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: September 23, 2004. 

Teresa LaHaie, 

Administrative Officer, National Foundation 

on the Arts and the Humanities, Institute 

of Museum and Library Services.

[FR Doc. 04–21828 Filed 9–24–04; 2:11 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7036–01–M

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE 

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES 

SES Performance Review Board

AGENCY: The National Endowment for 

the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

membership of the Performance Review 

Board of the National Endowment for 

the Humanities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Timothy G. Connelly, Director of 

Human Resources, National Endowment 

for the Humanities, 1100 Pennsylvania 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506; 

telephone (202) 606–8415.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 U.S.C. 

3393 and 4314 (c) (1) through (5) require 

each agency to establish, in accordance 

with regulations prescribed by the 

Office of Personnel Management, both 

an executive resources board and a 

performance review board for SES. The 

National Endowment for the Humanities 

has a combined Board, which is referred 

to as the Executive Resources and 

Performance Review Board (ERPRB). 

Effective October 1, 2004, the 

members of the National Endowment for 

the Humanities SES Performance 

Review Board selected to serve are 

Jeffrey Thomas, Assistant Chairman for 

Planning and Operations—Board 

Chairman, Howard Dickman, Assistant 

Chairman for Programs, Stephen Ross, 

Director Office of Challenge Grants and 

Candace Katz, Deputy Director, 

President’s Committee on the Arts and 

Humanities. All members will serve 

‘‘until replaced.’’

Bruce Cole, 

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 04–21693 Filed 9–27–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7536–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. 50–335 and 50–389] 

Florida Power and Light Company; 

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of 

Amendments to Facility Operating 

License, Proposed No Significant 

Hazards Consideration Determination, 

and Opportunity for a Hearing 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (the Commission) is 

considering issuance of amendments to 

Renewed Facility Operating License 

Nos. DPR–67 and NPF–16 issued to 

Florida Power and Light Company for 

operation of the St. Lucie Plant, Unit 

Nos. 1 and 2, located in St. Lucie 

County, Florida. 

The proposed amendments would 

allow the licensee to revise the St. Lucie 

Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications 

to eliminate certain pressure sensor 

response time testing (RTT) 

requirements, as discussed in the 

Combustion Engineering Owners Group 

(CEOG) Topical Report NPSD–1167, 

Revision 2, ‘‘Elimination of Pressure 

Sensor Response Time Testing 

Requirements,’’ which was approved by 

the NRC staff by letters dated July 24, 

2000, and December 5, 2000. 

Specifically, these amendments revise 

the St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Technical 

Specification Definitions 1.12, 

‘‘Engineered Safety Features Response 

Time,’’ and 1.26, ‘‘Reactor Protection 

System Response Time.’’

Before issuance of the proposed 

license amendments, the Commission 

will have made findings required by the 

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended 

(the Act), and the Commission’s 

regulations. 

The Commission has made a 

proposed determination that the 

amendment requests involve no 

significant hazards consideration. Under 

the Commission’s regulations in Title 10 

of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 

CFR), Section 50.92, this means that 

operation of the facility in accordance 

with the proposed amendments would 

not (1) involve a significant increase in 

the probability or consequences of an 

accident previously evaluated; or (2) 

create the possibility of a new or 

different kind of accident from any 

accident previously evaluated; or (3) 

involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR 

50.91(a), the licensee has provided its 

analysis of the issue of no significant 

hazards consideration, which is 

presented below:

1. Operation of the facility in accordance 

with the proposed amendments would not 

involve a significant increase in the 

probability or consequences of an accident 

previously evaluated. 

The proposed changes allow the 

elimination of pressure sensor response time 

testing. Response time testing is not an 

initiator of any accident previously 

evaluated. Consequently, the probability of 

an accident previously evaluated is not 

significantly increased. The allocated 

pressure sensor response times allowed in 

lieu of measurement have been determined to 

adequately represent the response time of the 

components such that the safety systems 

utilizing those components will continue to 

perform their accident mitigation function as 

assumed in the safety analysis. Therefore, the 

consequences of an accident previously 

evaluated are not significantly increased by 

this change. Therefore, this change does not 

57976 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 28, 2004 / Notices 

involve a significant increase in the 

probability or consequences of an accident 

previously evaluated. 

2. Operation of the facility in accordance 

with the proposed amendments would not 

create the possibility of a new or different 

kind of accident from any accident 

previously evaluated. 

The proposed changes allow the 

elimination of pressure sensor response time 

testing. The proposed change does not 

involve a physical alteration of the plant (no 

new or different type of equipment will be 

installed) or a change in the methods 

governing normal plant operation. Thus, this 

change does not create the possibility of a 

new or different kind of accident from any 

accident previously evaluated. 

3. Operation of the facility in accordance 

with the proposed amendments would not 

involve a significant reduction in a margin of 

safety. 

The proposed change allows the 

elimination of pressure sensor response time 

testing. EPRI [Energy Power Research 

Institute] Report NP–7243, ‘‘Investigation of 

Response Time Testing Requirements,’’ and 

CEOG Topical Report NPSD–1167, 

‘‘Elimination of Pressure Sensor Response 

Time Testing Requirements,’’ demonstrate 

that elimination of RTT does not adversely 

affect the ability to monitor instrument 

performance and capability to meet design 

basis requirements. The proposed change 

also allows the use of allocated response 

times for certain pressure sensors in lieu of 

measurement of those response times. These 

EPRI and CEOG Reports also determined that 

allocated response times may be used with 

no reduction in the margin of safety provided 

by the safety systems supported by those 

pressure sensors. Therefore, this change does 

not involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety.

The NRC staff has reviewed the 

licensee’s analysis and, based on this 

review, it appears that the three 

standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 

satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff 

proposes to determine that the 

amendment requests involve no 

significant hazards consideration. 

The Commission is seeking public 

comments on this proposed 

determination. Any comments received 

within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice will be 

considered in making any final 

determination. 

Normally, the Commission will not 

issue the amendments until the 

expiration of 60 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. The 

Commission may issue the license 

amendments before expiration of the 60-

day period provided that its final 

determination is that the amendments 

involve no significant hazards 

consideration. In addition, the 

Commission may issue the amendments 

prior to the expiration of the 30-day 

comment period should circumstances 

change during the 30-day comment 

period such that failure to act in a 

timely way would result, for example in 

derating or shutdown of the facility. 

Should the Commission take action 

prior to the expiration of either the 

comment period or the notice period, it 

will publish in the Federal Register a 

notice of issuance. Should the 

Commission make a final No Significant 

Hazards Consideration Determination, 

any hearing will take place after 

issuance. The Commission expects that 

the need to take this action will occur 

very infrequently. 

Written comments may be submitted 

by mail to the Chief, Rules and 

Directives Branch, Division of 

Administrative Services, Office of 

Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555–

0001, and should cite the publication 

date and page number of this Federal 

Register notice. Written comments may 

also be delivered to Room 6D59, Two 

White Flint North, 11545 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland, from 7:30 

a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays. 

Documents may be examined, and/or 

copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public 

Document Room, located at One White 

Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 

11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 

Rockville, Maryland.

The filing of requests for hearing and 

petitions for leave to intervene is 

discussed below. 

Within 60 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, the licensee 

may file a request for a hearing with 

respect to issuance of the amendment to 

the subject facility operating license and 

any person whose interest may be 

affected by this proceeding and who 

wishes to participate as a party in the 

proceeding must file a written request 

for a hearing and a petition for leave to 

intervene. Requests for a hearing and a 

petition for leave to intervene shall be 

filed in accordance with the 

Commission’s ‘‘Rules of Practice for 

Domestic Licensing Proceedings’’ in 10 

CFR Part 2. Interested persons should 

consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, 

which is available at the Commission’s 

PDR, located at One White Flint North, 

Public File Area 01F21, 11555 Rockville 

Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. 

Publicly available records will be 

accessible from the Agencywide 

Documents Access and Management 

System’s (ADAMS) Public Electronic 

Reading Room on the Internet at the 

NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/ 

reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/. If a 

request for a hearing or petition for 

leave to intervene is filed by the above 

date, the Commission or a presiding 

officer designated by the Commission or 

by the Chief Administrative Judge of the 

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 

Panel, will rule on the request and/or 

petition; and the Secretary or the Chief 

Administrative Judge of the Atomic 

Safety and Licensing Board will issue a 

notice of a hearing or an appropriate 

order. 

As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a 

petition for leave to intervene shall set 

forth with particularity the interest of 

the petitioner in the proceeding, and 

how that interest may be affected by the 

results of the proceeding. The petition 

should specifically explain the reasons 

why intervention should be permitted 

with particular reference to the 

following general requirements: (1) The 

name, address and telephone number of 

the requestor or petitioner; (2) the 

nature of the requestor’s/petitioner’s 

right under the Act to be made a party 

to the proceeding; (3) the nature and 

extent of the requestor’s/petitioner’s 

property, financial, or other interest in 

the proceeding; and (4) the possible 

effect of any decision or order which 

may be entered in the proceeding on the 

requestor’s/petitioner’s interest. The 

petition must also identify the specific 

contentions which the petitioner/

requestor seeks to have litigated at the 

proceeding. 

Each contention must consist of a 

specific statement of the issue of law or 

fact to be raised or controverted. In 

addition, the petitioner/requestor shall 

provide a brief explanation of the bases 

for the contention and a concise 

statement of the alleged facts or expert 

opinion which support the contention 

and on which the petitioner intends to 

rely in proving the contention at the 

hearing. The petitioner/requestor must 

also provide references to those specific 

sources and documents of which the 

petitioner is aware and on which the 

petitioner intends to rely to establish 

those facts or expert opinion. The 

petition must include sufficient 

information to show that a genuine 

dispute exists with the applicant on a 

material issue of law or fact. 

Contentions shall be limited to matters 

within the scope of the amendments 

under consideration. The contention 

must be one which, if proven, would 

entitle the petitioner to relief. A 

petitioner/requestor who fails to satisfy 

these requirements with respect to at 

least one contention will not be 

permitted to participate as a party. 

Those permitted to intervene become 

parties to the proceeding, subject to any 

limitations in the order granting leave to 

intervene, and have the opportunity to 

participate fully in the conduct of the 

hearing. 

If a hearing is requested, the 

Commission will make a final 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 28, 2004 / Notices 57977

determination on the issue of no 

significant hazards consideration. The 

final determination will serve to decide 

when the hearing is held. If the final 

determination is that the amendment 

requests involve no significant hazards 

consideration, the Commission may 

issue the amendments and make it 

immediately effective, notwithstanding 

the request for a hearing. Any hearing 

held would take place after issuance of 

the amendments. If the final 

determination is that the amendment 

requests involve a significant hazards 

consideration, any hearing held would 

take place before the issuance of any 

amendments. 

Nontimely requests and/or petitions 

and contentions will not be entertained 

absent a determination by the 

Commission or the presiding officer of 

the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 

that the petition, request and/or the 

contentions should be granted based on 

a balancing of the factors specified in 10 

CFR 2.309(a)(1)(i)–(viii). 

A request for a hearing or a petition 

for leave to intervene must be filed by: 

(1) First class mail addressed to the 

Office of the Secretary of the 

Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555–

0001, Attention: Rulemaking and 

Adjudications Staff; (2) courier, express 

mail, and expedited delivery services: 

Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, 

One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, 

Attention: Rulemaking and 

Adjudications Staff; (3) E-mail 

addressed to the Office of the Secretary, 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

hearingdocket@nrc.gov; or (4) facsimile 

transmission addressed to the Office of 

the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC, 

Attention: Rulemakings and 

Adjudications Staff at (301) 415–1101, 

verification number is (301) 415–1966. 

A copy of the request for hearing and 

petition for leave to intervene should 

also be sent to the Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555–

0001, and it is requested that copies be 

transmitted either by means of facsimile 

transmission to 301–415–3725 or by 

email to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. A 

copy of the request for hearing and 

petition for leave to intervene should 

also be sent to M.S. Ross, Attorney, 

Florida Power & Light, P.O. Box 14000, 

Juno Beach, Florida 33408–0420, 

attorney for the licensee. 

For further details with respect to this 

action, see the application for 

amendments dated November 21, 2003, 

which is available for public inspection 

at the Commission’s PDR, located at 

One White Flint North, File Public Area 

O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first 

floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly 

available records will be accessible from 

the Agencywide Documents Access and 

Management System’s (ADAMS) Public 

Electronic Reading Room on the Internet 

at the NRC Web site, http://

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

Persons who do not have access to 

ADAMS or who encounter problems in 

accessing the documents located in 

ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR 

Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–

397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by e-mail 

to pdr@nrc.gov.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd 

day of September 2004.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Brendan T. Moroney, 

Project Manager, Section 2, Project 

Directorate II, Division of Licensing Project 

Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation.

[FR Doc. 04–21652 Filed 9–27–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. 30–5980 and 30–5982 and 

ASLBP No. 04–833–07–MLA] 

Safety Light Corporation; 

Establishment of Atomic Safety and 

Licensing Board 

Pursuant to delegation by the 

Commission dated December 29, 1972, 

published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 

28710 (1972), and the Commission’s 

regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 

2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 2.318, and 2.321, 

notice is hereby given that an Atomic 

Safety and Licensing Board is being 

established to preside over the following 

proceeding: Safety Light Corporation, 

Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania Site 

(Materials License Amendment). 

This proceeding concerns a request 

for hearing submitted on August 30, 

2004, by the Pennsylvania Department 

of Environmental Protection in response 

to a June 23, 2004 notice of opportunity 

for hearing regarding a proposed 

amendment to the 10 CFR Part 30 

byproduct materials licenses of the 

Safety Light Corporation (SLC) that 

would (1) renew SLC’s licenses to 

manufacture devices containing tritium 

at its Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania facility; 

and (2) authorize decommissioning of 

contaminated portions of that facility. 

The notice was published in the Federal 

Register on June 30, 2004 (69 FR 39515). 

The Board is comprised of the 

following administrative judges:

E. Roy Hawkens, Chair, Atomic Safety 

and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001. 

Ann M. Young, Atomic Safety and 

Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001. 

Dr. Peter S. Lam, Atomic Safety and 

Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001. 

All correspondence, documents, and 

other materials shall be filed with the 

administrative judges in accordance 

with 10 CFR 2.302.

Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd 

day of September 2004. 

G. Paul Bollwerk, III, 

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety 

and Licensing Board Panel.

[FR Doc. 04–21654 Filed 9–27–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Advisory Committee on the Medical 

Uses of Isotopes: Meeting Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission will convene an open 

session teleconference meeting of the 

Advisory Committee on the Medical 

Uses of Isotopes (ACMUI) on October 5, 

2004.

PURPOSE: This meeting will be held to 

discuss the working group’s 

recommendations on a possible 

amendment of the current 10 CFR Part 

35, to include adding required hours of 

didactic training to sections 35.55, 

35.190, 35.390, and 35.290 for the 

alternate pathway. During this meeting, 

NRC staff, the ACMUI, and Agreement 

State personnel will engage in 

discussions pertaining to NRC staff’s 

recommendations.

DATE AND TIME FOR MEETING: The 

teleconference meeting will be held on 

Tuesday, October 5, 2004, from 1 p.m. 

to 3 p.m.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Any member of 

the public who wishes to participate in 

the teleconference discussion may 

contact Angela R. McIntosh using the 

contact information below.

ADDRESS FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS: U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Two 

White Flint North Building, 11545 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852–

2738.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Angela R. McIntosh, telephone (301) 

415–5030; e-mail arm@nrc.gov of the