alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3108.10 Relinquishment. The lessee(s) may relinquish the lease or any legal subdivision of the lease at any time. The lessee(s) must file a written relinquishment with the BLM State Office with jurisdiction over the lease. All lessees holding record title interests in the lease must sign the relinquishment. A relinquishment takes effect on the date the lessee filed it with the BLM. However, the lessee(s) and the party that issued the bond will continue to be obligated to: ( a ) Make payments of all accrued rentals and royalties, including payments of compensatory royalty due for all drainage that occurred before the relinquishment;
( b ) Place all wells to be relinquished in condition for suspension or abandonment as the BLM requires; and
( c ) Complete reclamation of the leased sites after stopping or abandoning oil and gas operations on the lease, under a plan approved by the BLM or the appropriate surface management agency.
§ 3137.41 What continuing development obligations must I define in a unit agreement? A unit agreement must provide for submission of supplemental or additional plans of development which obligate the operator to a program of exploration and development (see § 3137.71 of this subpart) that, after completion of the initial obligations — ( a ) Meets or exceeds the rate of non-unit operations in the vicinity of the unit; and
( b ) Represents an investment proportionate to the size of the area covered by the unit agreement.
[67 FR 17886, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 73 FR 6444, Feb. 4, 2008]
#### Ralph Waldt v. Goodwin Manufacturing Company.

Motion granted upon payment by plaintiff of thirty dollars trial fee, ten dollars costs of this motion, ten dollars costs and disbursements of the appeal in this court, and costs on the demurrer in the court below. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §1680v. Director of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Treatment

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary, acting through the Service, shall establish within the Service the position of the Director of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Treatment (referred to in this section as the "Director").

#### (b) Duties

The Director shall—

(1) coordinate and promote HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment activities specific to Indians;

(2) provide technical assistance to Indian tribes, tribal organizations, and urban Indian organizations regarding existing HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment programs; and

(3) ensure interagency coordination to facilitate the inclusion of Indians in Federal HIV/AIDS research and grant opportunities, with emphasis on the programs operated under the Ryan White Comprehensive Aids 1 Resources Emergency Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–381; 104 Stat. 576) and the amendments made by that Act.

#### (c) Report

Not later than 2 years after March 23, 2010, and not less frequently than once every 2 years thereafter, the Director shall submit to Congress a report describing, with respect to the preceding 2-year period—

(1) each activity carried out under this section; and

(2) any findings of the Director with respect to HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment activities specific to Indians.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title VIII, §832, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10221(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act of 1990, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), is Pub. L. 101–381, Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 576, which enacted subchapter XXIV (§300ff et seq.) of chapter 6A of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, transferred section 300ee–6 of Title 42 to section 300ff–48 of Title 42, amended sections 284a, 286, 287a, 287c–2 (now 285q–2), 289f, 290aa–3a (now 290aa–1), 299c–5, 300ff–48, and 300aaa to 300aaa–13 (now 238 to 238m) of Title 42, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 201, 300x–4, 300ff–11, 300ff–46, and 300ff–80 of Title 42. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1990 Amendments note set out under section 201 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section 832 of Pub. L. 94–437 is based on section 199B of title I of S. 1790, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, as reported by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate in Dec. 2009, which was enacted into law by section 10221(a) of Pub. L. 111–148.

1 So in original. Probably should be "AIDS".
<PAGE>

Exhibit 3.1c

Date Filed:
2/24/05  3:38:10 PM
In the office of
Dean Heller
Secretary of State


              CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                         FOR NEVADA PROFIT CORPORATIONS
          (Pursant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After issuance of Stock)


1. Name of corporation: Whistler Investments, Inc.

2. The articles have been amended as follows:

Article I
The name of the corporation is Hybrid Technologies, Inc.

Article III
(a) The corporation shall have the authority to issue a total of Thirty-Two
Million (32,000,000) shares, of which Twenty-Seven Million (27,000,000) shares
shall be common stock, par value $.001 per share (the common stock) and Five
Million (5,000,000) shares shall be preferred stock, par value $.001 per share
(the preferred stock).

<PAGE>

3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote
by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of
incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: a majority.

4. Effective Date of Filing (optional): 3/9/05.

                                /s/ Holly Roseberry
5. Officer Signature required): ______________________
                                Holly Roseberry,
                                President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
21.1





Subsidiaries
of Landmark Bancorp, Inc.





The only
significant subsidiary of the Company is Landmark National Bank, a national
banking association with its main office located in Manhattan, Kansas, and with
branch offices, including the acquisition of FMB on January 1, 2006, located in
Auburn, Dodge City (2), Fort Scott, Garden City, Great Bend (2), Hoisington,
Junction City, LaCrosse, Lawrence (2), Louisburg, Manhattan, Osage City,
Osawatomie, Paola, Topeka (2) and Wamego, Kansas.  The Company also
owns all of the common securities of Landmark Capital Trust I and Landmark
Capital Trust II, which were formed to issue trust preferred securities in a
private placement.
#### Sargent Lumber Company, Defendant in Error, v. J. W. Wells Lumber Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 16,401.

Accord and *satisfaction*— what *.essential to establish.*A check accompanying a purported statement will not be deemed as tendered in full settlement of the claims of the creditor, unless a condition is made to the effect that if the check be accepted, it' must be in payment of all demands.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles N. Goodnow, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1910.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 28, 1912.

Harry A. Biossat, for plaintiff in error.

Dent & Jackson, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Sargent Lumber Company brought suit to recover $150 advanced and $19 expenses on a car of lumber ordered from the J. W. Wells Lumber Company. The.lumber having been rejected, the Wells Company voluntarily took charge of it. The Sargent Company requested the return of the $169 advanced, and after eleven months the Wells Company remitted its check for $36.87 with a letter. This suit is for the balance of $132.13, for which judgment was rendered.

If is claimed by the Wells Company, plaintiff in error, that the check for $36.87 was tendered as payment in full and was accepted by the Sargent Company upon that condition, and therefore, under the authority of Ostrander v. Scott, 161 Ill. 339, and other similar cases, this constituted full settlement of the account.

The check was in the usual form, and the letter merely said, “We herewith enclose you check for $36.87 balance of your credit on car No. 28055 which *582we have finally succeeded in getting a settlement on from Maxwell Bros Co. Tours truly, J. W. Wells Lumber Co.” With the check was also enclosed what purported to be a statement; but in none of these things is there any condition to the effect that if the check be accepted it must be as payment in full of all demands.

This being true, the plaintiff was entitled to retain the check and to recover for the balance due it.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Probe Manufacturing, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Amended Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form 10-K/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  August 20, 2008   /s/  Reza Zarif ---------------------- Reza Zarif Chief  Executive  Officer Director   Date:  August 20, 2008   /s/  John Bennett ------------------------ John Bennett Chief  Financial  Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRare Earth Optical Temperature SensorA new optical temperature sensor suitable for high temperatures (greater than 1700 K) and harsh environments is introduced. The key component of the sensor is the rare earth material contained at the end of a sensor that is in contact with the sample being measured. The measured narrow wavelength band emission from the rare earth is used to deduce the sample temperature. A simplified relation between the temperature and measured radiation was verified experimentally. The upper temperature limit of the sensor is determined by material limits to be approximately 2000 C. The lower limit, determined by the minimum detectable radiation, is found to be approximately 700 K. At high temperatures 1 K resolution is predicted. Also, millisecond response times are calculated.Document ID20000025307Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsChubb, Donald L.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Wolford, David S.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 2000Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209657E-11970NASA/TM-2000-209657Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 632-1A-1ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000025307.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 3141.55 Dating of lease.

A combined hydrocarbon lease will be effective as of the first day of the month following the date the lease is signed on behalf of the United States, except where a prior written request is made, a lease may be made effective on the first of the month in which the lease is signed.
EXHIBIT 4.1(b)


                                ----------------
                                HEALTH DISCOVERY
                                  CORPORATION

               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS
          AUTHORIZED: 200,000,000 COMMON SHARES, NO PAR VALUE PER SHARE

THIS CERTIFIES THAT                                         SEE REVERSE FOR
                                                          CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
                                                        ------------------------
                                                           CUSIP 42218R 10 0
                                                        ------------------------
IS THE OWNER OF

          FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE OF

                          HEALTH DISCOVERY CORPORATION

transferable only on the books of this Corporation in person or by attorney
upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed or assigned. This
Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and
Registrar.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
endorsed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and to be
sealed with the facsimile seal of the Corporation.

Dated:

              [HEALTH DISCOVERY CORPORATION CORPORATE SEAL TEXAS]

Robert S. Braswell                                         Stephen D. Barnhill
     SECRETARY                                                 CHAIRMAN/CEO






COUNTERSIGNED:
CORPORATE STOCK TRANSFER, INC.
3200 Cherry Creek Drive, Suite 430, Denver, CO 80209

By: ________________________________________________
    Transfer Agent and Registrar Authorized Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

**INDEPENDENTACCOUNTANTS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors

Landmark Bancorp, Inc.:

 

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-103091, onForm S-8 of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated March 4, 2003, relatingto the consolidated balance sheets of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. as ofDecember 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2001 and therelated consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity andcomprehensive income, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2002, thethree months ended December 31, 2001 and the year ended September 30, 2001,respectively, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual reporton Form 10-K of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. Our report refers to a change in method of accounting for goodwill andother intangible assets.

 

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP           |   |
|------------------------|--------|
|                   |
|                   |
| Kansas City,  Missouri |
| March 27,  2003   |

 

1

----
### §564w–2. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §29, as added Pub. L. 93–102, Aug. 16, 1973, 87 Stat. 349, which related to Federal acquisition of tribal land, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 166

 165

 155

 160

 156

 150

 157

 154

 144

 144

 157

 151

 158

 139

 145

 151

 147

 162

 136

 142

 143

 137

 151

 145

 149

 154

 150

 146

 151

 157

 169

 134

 135

 135

 132

 128

 131

 128

 126

 124

 125

 127

 128

 122

 118

 122

 119

 116

 115

 117

 114

 114

 118

 115

 119

 119

 122

 124

 123

 124

 126

 127

 144

 144

 142

 143

 140

 138

 140

 134

 134

 134

 137

 139

 135

 130

 131

 132

 132

 131

 126

 122

 125

 125

 126

 128

 131

 135

 133

 132

 134

 138

 146

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### William P. McCormick v. Frank H. Tyler, as Sole Executor, etc.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 350

 361

 351

 350

 344

 346

 349

 350

 355

 362

 364

 363

 373

 365

 369

 375

 368

 363

 365

 369

 377

 388

 407

 429

 443

 451

 473

 473

 482

 497

 507

 332

 333

 335

 333

 333

 333

 333

 336

 336

 335

 343

 349

 351

 354

 350

 352

 351

 349

 352

 351

 351

 365

 374

 394

 403

 428

 443

 459

 466

 471

 479

 338

 340

 339

 338

 337

 337

 338

 343

 343

 344

 352

 355

 359

 359

 358

 362

 358

 356

 356

 357

 364

 376

 392

 409

 424

 442

 456

 466

 471

 479

 491

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 10, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
§ 3282.6 When must the unit operator propose to revise a participating area boundary? ( a ) The unit operator must submit a written application to BLM to revise a participating area boundary no later than 60 days after receipt of the BLM determination described herein, when either: ( 1 ) A well is completed that BLM has determined will produce or utilize in commercial quantities, and such well: ( i ) Is located outside of an existing participating area; or
( ii ) Drains an area outside the existing participating area; or
( 2 ) An injection well located outside of an existing participating area is put into use that BLM has determined provides reservoir pressure support to production.
( b ) The unit operator may submit a written application for a revision of a participating area when new or additional technical information or revised interpretations of any information provides a basis for revising the boundary.
( c ) The unit operator may submit a written request to BLM to delay a participation area revision decision when drilling multiple wells in the unit is actively pursued or the drilling is providing additional technical information. A delay will not affect the effective date of any participation area revision (see § 3282.7). The request must include: ( 1 ) The well locations;
( 2 ) Anticipated spud and completion dates of each well;
( 3 ) The timing of well testing and analyses of technical information; and
( 4 ) The anticipated date BLM will receive the participation area revision for review.
( d ) BLM will provide the unit operator with a written decision on the application to revise a participating area or the request to delay a participating area revision decision by BLM.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4580 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4580

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require a lactation space in 
       each medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2022

  Ms. Rosen (for herself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to require a lactation space in 
       each medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lactation Spaces for Veteran Moms 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LACTATION SPACES IN MEDICAL CENTERS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 17 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1720K. Lactation spaces in medical centers of the Department
    ``(a) Lactation Space Required.--The Secretary shall ensure that 
each medical center of the Department contains a lactation space.
    ``(b) No Unauthorized Entry.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to authorize an individual to enter a medical center of the 
Department or portion thereof that the individual is not otherwise 
authorized to enter.
    ``(c) Lactation Space Defined.--In this section, the term 
`lactation space' means a hygienic place, other than a bathroom, that--
            ``(1) is shielded from view;
            ``(2) is free from intrusion;
            ``(3) is accessible to disabled individuals (including such 
        individuals who use wheelchairs);
            ``(4) contains a chair and a working surface;
            ``(5) is easy to locate;
            ``(6) is clearly identified with signage; and
            ``(7) is available for use by women veterans and members of 
        the public to express breast milk.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item related to section 
1720J the following new item:

``1720K. Lactation spaces in medical centers of the Department.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall carry 
out section 1720K of title 38, United States Code, as added by this 
section, not later than two years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

BRANDON T. OSTERMAN

,

Defendant Below

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § No. 347 , 2020 § § Court Below

— Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § Cr. ID No. 1 508002375 (K) § § § §

Submitted: December 22 , 2020 Decided: January 7 , 2021

ORDER

It appears to the Court that, on December 1, 2020 , the Chief Deputy Clerk issued

a notice, by certified mail, directing the appellant, Brandon T. Osterman , to show cause

why his appeal should not be d ismissed for his failure to pay the Supreme Court filing

fee or to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

. Postal reco rds show that Osterman

received the notice to show cause b efore December 11, 2020 . A timely response to the

notice to show cause was due on or before December 21 , 2020

. To date, Osterman has

not paid the Supreme Court filing fee, filed a motion to procee d in forma pauperis

, or

responded to the notice to show cause

. Dismissal of this action is therefore deemed to

be unopposed.2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule s 3(b)(2)

and 29 (b ), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Tamika R. Mo ntgomery

- Reeves

Justice