alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3152.2 Action on application. ( a ) The authorized officer shall review each application and approve or disapprove it within 90 calendar days, unless compliance with statutory requirements such as the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*) delays this action. The applicant shall be notified promptly in writing of any such delay.
( b ) The authorized officer shall include in each geophysical exploration permit terms and conditions deemed necessary to protect values, mineral resources, and nonmineral resources. Geophysical permits within National Petroleum Reserve—Alaska shall contain such reasonable conditions, restrictions and prohibitions as the authorized officer deems appropriate to mitigate adverse effects upon the surface resources of the Reserve and to satisfy the requirement of section 104(b) of the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6504) (See part 3130 for stipulations relating to the National Petroleum Reserve—Alaska).
( c ) An exploration permit shall become effective on the date specified by the authorized officer and shall expire 1 year thereafter.
( d ) For lands subject to section 1008 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, exploration shall be authorized only upon a determination that such activities can be conducted in a manner which is consistent with the purposes for which the affected area is managed under applicable law.
§ 2812.4-3 Agreements and arbitration between permittee and licensee respecting adjustment of road use. ( a ) When the United States exercises the right received under this paragraph to use or to license any person to use a road of a permittee, the permittee or his successor in interest shall not unreasonably obstruct the United States or such licensee in such use. If there has been no agreement under § 2812.3-7 covering such matters, the permittee shall have the right to prescribe reasonable operating regulations, to apply uniformly as between the permittee and such licensee, covering the use of such road for such matters as speed and load limits, scheduling of hauls during period of use by more than one timber operator, coordination of peak periods of use, and such other matters as are reasonably related to safe operations and protection of the road; if the capacity of such road should be inadequate to accommodate the use thereof which such licensee and permittee desire to make concurrently, they shall endeavor to adjust their respective uses by agreement.
( b ) If the permittee and such licensee are unable to agree as to the reasonableness of such operating regulations or on the adjustment of their respective uses where the capacity of the road is inadequate to accommodate their concurrent use, then upon the written request of either party delivered to the other party, the matter shall be referred to and finally determined by arbitration in accordance with the procedures established by § 2812.4-4.
( c ) The arbitrators may make such disposition of a dispute involving the reasonableness of such operating regulations as appears equitable to them, taking into account the capacity and the construction of the road and the volume of use to which it will be subjected. In the determination of a dispute arising out of the inadequacy of the capacity of a road to accommodate the concurrent use by a permittee and a licensee, the arbitrators may make such disposition thereof as appears equitable to them, taking into account, among other pertinent facts, the commitments of the permittee and the licensee with respect to the cutting and removal of the timber involved and the disposition of the products derived therefrom; the extent to which each of the parties may practicably satisfy any of the aforesaid commitments from other timber currently controlled by him; the past normal use of such road by the permittee; the extent to which federal timber has contributed to the amortization of the capital costs of such road; and the extent to which the United States or its licensees have enlarged the road capacity.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,198.51

 1,198.73

 1,198.79

 1,198.54

 1,198.48

 1,198.43

 1,198.46

 1,198.50

 1,198.50

 1,198.59

 1,198.72

 1,198.80

 1,198.96

 1,199.06

 1,199.15

 1,199.19

 1,199.18

 1,198.91

 1,198.57

 1,198.40

 1,198.17

 1,198.25

 1,198.35

 1,198.54

 1,198.65

 1,198.59

 1,198.53

 1,198.59

 205.7

 206.4

 206.5

 205.8

 205.6

 205.5

 205.6

 205.7

 205.7

 205.9

 206.3

 206.6

 207.0

 207.3

 207.6

 207.7

 207.7

 206.9

 205.9

 205.4

 204.7

 204.9

 205.2

 205.8

 206.1

 205.9

 205.8

 205.9

STORAGE

-0.4

+0.6

+0.2

-0.7

-0.2

-0.1

+0.1

+0.1

+0.0

+0.3

+0.4

+0.2

+0.5

+0.3

+0.3

+0.1

+0.0

-0.8

-1.0

-0.5

-0.7

+0.2

+0.3

+0.6

+0.3

-0.2

-0.2

+0.2

CHANGE

594

817

574

407

278

203

368

343

280

414

473

456

517

429

880

613

422

310

281

321

471

490

430

569

447

197

381

373

INFLOW

 564

 290

 282

 578

 167

 77

 124

 77

 77

 77

 77

 134

 77

 77

 542

 330

 234

 510

 586

 374

 612

 161

 77

 77

 77

 79

 263

 77

PP

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

OUTLETS

 8

 0

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 24

 3

 3

 0

 0

 0

 10

 5

 10

 7

 7

 7

 7

C.F.S.

 .09

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .27

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .06

 .12

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .08

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

March 1, 2021

FEBRUARY 2021 WHISKEYTOWN LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS

RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAP.

C.F.S. * FRANCIS

COMPUTED

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -0.1 12,338 5,600 0 6,677 122 1.36

ACRE-FEET -0.1 24,472 11,108 0 13,244 242

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 13,244

SPILL 0 24,352

 206.1

OUTLET 11,108

TOTAL

JUDGE

CARR PP

(1)

 193

 186

 129

 129

 21

 14

 141

 129

 133

 161

 156

 129

 129

 129

 442

 270

 139

 14

 14

 71

 255

 254

 207

 351

 241

 35

 233

 215

 4,520

 8,965

FROM

TO

SPRING CR.

TO CLEAR CR.

CLEAR

CR.

NATURAL

FLOW

 401

 631

 445

 278

 257

 189

 227

 214

 147

 253

 317

 327

 388

 300

 438

 343

 283

 296

 267

 250

 216

 236

 223

 218

 206

 162

 148

 158

 7,818

 15,507

 .59

 .39

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .84

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .50

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 2.40

PRECIP

INCHES

PRECIPITATION

 2.40

 17.78

THIS MONTH

JULY 1, 2020 TO DATE

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE 17.78
Exhibit 3.1(a)




---



##### 



Name
    
AddressRussell Berrie
    
    Russ Berrie and Company, Inc.
111 Bauer Drive Oakland, New Jersey 07436A. Curts Cooke
    
    Russ Berrie and Company Inc. 111 Bauer Drive
Oakland, New Jersey 07436James A. Madonna, Jr.
    

Russ
Berrie and Company, Inc. 111 Bauer Drive
Oakland, New Jersey 07436Murray L. Berrie
    
    Nathan Berrie & Sons, Inc. Long Beach Road Island
Park, New York 11558Charles Klatskin
    
    Charles Klatskin, Inc. 400 Hollister Road Teterboro,
New Jersey 07608Robert E. Mc Entee
    
    Beecham Inc. Three Garret Mountain Plaza West
Paterson, New Jersey 07424Sidney Slauson
    

Rosner and Feltman 75 Essex Street Hackensack, New
Jersey 07601Benjamin J. Sottile
    
    Warner Communications, Inc. 75 Rockefeller Plaza New
York, New York 10022
     2




---



##### 



RUSS BERRIE AND COMPANY, INC.By:

/s/ Russell BerrieRussell BerrieChairman of the Board and President  3




---



##### 



TO:
    
    SECRETARY OF STATEFEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBERSTATE OF NEW JERSEY
    
    22-1815337
        Number of Shares Voting
    
    Number of Shares VotingFor Amendment
    
    Against Amendment13,160,697
    
    0
  RUSS BERRIE AND COMPANY, INC./s/ A. Curts CookeA. CURTS COOKEEXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT




---



##### 



þ
 o
  OF:RUSS BERRIE AND COMPANY, INC.(For use by Domestic, Foreign, Profit and Nonprofit Corporations)(Nonprofit Corporations Must File this Form in Triplicate)
   Certificate of Amendment to theRestated Certificate of Incorporation
    
    September 22, 1986 (copy attached)(Date Filed)
  Number of Shares Voting
    
    Number of Shares VotingFor Amendment
    
    Against Amendment13,160,697
    
    0
  Number of Shares Voting
    
    Number of Shares VotingFor Amendment
    
    Against Amendment13,073,022
    
    286,609
 Signature:
    
    /s/ A. Curts Cooke(Must be Ch. of Bd., Pres. or Vice Pres.)Name:
    
    A. Curts Cooke, Executive Vice President(Print or Type Above Name and Title)Date:
    
    October 6, 1986
 The purpose of this form is to simplify the filing requirements of the Secretary of State
and does not replace the need for competent legal advice.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of The Village Green Bookstore, Inc. because it has been delinquent in its periodic filing obligations under Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 since August 1997. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. e.d.t. on September 23, 2004, through 11:59 p.m. e.d.t. on October 6, 2004. 

By the Commission. 

Jonathan G. Katz, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-21684 Filed 9-23-04; 1:27 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Warren S. Hoffman, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Director of the managing general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties,
Inc. (the Managing General Partner), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the Partnership), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Partnerships quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Warren S. Hoffman                                                                                    
|Warren S. Hoffman Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of the Managing General Partner August 14, 2007
§ 2653.7 Sitka-Kenai-Juneau-Kodiak selections. ( a ) The corporations representing the Natives residing in Sitka, Kenai, Juneau, and Kodiak, who incorporate under the laws of the State of Alaska, may each select the surface estate of up to 23,040 acres of lands of similar character located in reasonable proximity to those municipalities.
( b ) The corporations representing the Natives residing in Sitka, Kenai, Juneau, and Kodiak, shall nominate not less than 92,160 acres of lands within 50 miles of each of the four named cities which are similar in character to the lands in which each of the cities is located. After review and public hearings, the Secretary shall withdraw up to 46,080 acres near each of the cities from the lands nominated. Each corporation representing the Native residents of the four named cities may select not more than one-half the area withdrawn for selection by that corporation. The Secretary shall convey the area selected.
§ 30.240 How will the judge decide a petition for rehearing? ( a ) The judge may consider a petition as a petition for reopening if the petition for rehearing is not timely filed.
( b ) The judge may summarily deny the petition based on the deficiencies of the petition. A summary denial is an order in which the judge denies the petition without deciding the merits of the issues raised in the petition and is warranted if: ( 1 ) The petition alleges mere disagreement with a decision;
( 2 ) The petition is based on newly discovered evidence and fails to meet the requirements of § 30.238(e); or
( 3 ) The petition is based solely on issues or evidence described in § 30.238(d)(1) or (2).
( c ) If the petition fails to show proper grounds for rehearing, the judge will issue an order denying the petition for rehearing and including the reasons for denials.
( d ) If the petition shows proper grounds for rehearing, the judge must: ( 1 ) Cause copies of the petition and all papers filed by the petitioner to be served on those persons whose interest in the estate may be affected if the petition is granted;
( 2 ) Allow all persons served a reasonable, specified time in which to respond to the petition for rehearing; and
( 3 ) Consider with or without a hearing, the issues raised in the petition.
( e ) The judge may affirm, modify, or vacate the former decision.
( f ) On entry of a final order, including a summary denial, the judge must distribute the order to the petitioner, the agencies, and the interested parties. The order must include a notice stating that interested parties who are adversely affected, or BIA, have the right to appeal the final order to the Board, within 30 days of the date on which the order was mailed, and giving the Board's address.
[86 FR 72087, Dec. 20, 2021]
### §500j. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 897, §11, 50 Stat. 902, which defined "reindeer" as used in this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, May 4, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-10319 Filed 4-25-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
§ 3137.15 If the Federal lands constitute less than 10 percent of the lands in the proposed unit area, is the unit agreement subject to Federal regulations or approval? If the Federal lands constitute less than 10 percent of the lands in the proposed unit area— ( a ) You may use a unit agreement approved by the State and/or a native corporation;
( b ) BLM will authorize commitment of the Federal lands to the unit if it determines that the unit agreement protects the public interest; or
( c ) As unit operator you may ask BLM to approve and administer the unit. If BLM agrees to approve and administer the unit, you must follow, and BLM will administer, the regulations in this subpart and 43 CFR part 3160.
1 

Central Valley Project Conservation Program FY20 

Projects

Project Proposed Activity Funding

McKinney Ranch 

Conservation Easement 

Acquisition Project

Vollmar Natural Lands 

Consulting 

Conservation easement on the 3,602-acre 

McKinney Ranch which is part of the “Four 

Corners” area in Madera. The ranch contains 

11% of the 33,000 

acres of mapped vernal pool habitat in the 

“Four Corners” area, and 3% of the mapped 

vernal pool habitat in the entire Madera 

Core Recovery Area.

$1,000,000

Producing Novel GenomeLevel Resources for Vernal 

Pool Crustaceans of 

Conservation Concern in 

California 

UC Davis

The project will provide information 

important to the recovery of the federally 

threatened vernal pool fairy shrimp and 

endangered vernal pool tadpole shrimp. The 

research will produce novel (new and 

original) genome-level resources leading to 

development of a reference genome for 

the species to provide an approximation of 

the DNA which is essential for carrying out 

genetic research to assist with the species’ 

recovery.

$366,837

Project Costs N/A $1,366,837

Program Administrative 

Costs

N/A $125,163

Total Program 

Expenditures

N/A $1,492,000
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNominal SARAL Transfer FunctionThis paper gives a calculation of the range correction and cross section of the SARAL (Satellite with Argos and ALtiKa) Indian/French ocean radar satellite retroreflector array assuming the cube corners are coated and have a dihedral angle offset of about 1.5 arcseconds to account for velocity aberration. The cubes are assumed to all have the same orientation within the mounting. The derived range correction may be applied in precise orbit determination analyses that use Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) data to SARAL.Document ID20160007904Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsArnold, David A.*(Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge, MA, United States)*Lemoine, Frank*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Date AcquiredJune 24, 2016Publication DateJuly 1, 2015Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingAstrodynamicsReport/Patent NumberGSFC-E-DAA-TN26514NASA/TM-2015-217533Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX14AQ52GDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsSARALSatellite laser rangingPrecise orbit determinationAvailable DownloadsNameType20160007904.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20160001364See AlsoNominal SARAL Transfer Functionvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 802.211 Petition for review. ( a ) Within 30 days after the receipt of an acknowledgment of a notice of appeal issued pursuant to § 802.210, the petitioner shall submit a petition for review to the Board which petition lists the specific issues to be considered on appeal.
( b ) Each petition for review shall be accompanied by a supporting brief, memorandum of law or other statement which: Specifically states the issues to be considered by the Board; presents, with appropriate headings, an argument with respect to each issue presented with references to transcripts, pieces of evidence and other parts of the record to which the petitioner wishes the Board to refer; a short conclusion stating the precise result the petitioner seeks on each issue and any authorities upon which the petition relies to support such proposed result. The Longshore Desk Book and Black Lung Desk Book are not intended as final legal authorities and should not be cited or relied upon as such.
( c ) Copies of the petition for review and accompanying documents must be served upon all parties and the Solicitor of Labor.
( d ) Failure to submit a petition for review and brief within the 30-day period or to comply with any part of this section may, in the discretion of the Board, cause the appeal to be deemed abandoned (see § 802.402).
( e ) When a party appears pro se the Board may, in its discretion, waive formal compliance with the requirements of this section and may, depending upon the particular circumstances, prescribe an alternate method of furnishing such information as may be necessary for the Board to decide the merits of any such appeal.
### §637. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Apr. 19, 1950, ch. 92, §7, 64 Stat. 46, which related to use of Navajo tribal funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.