alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4637 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify the meaning of 

the term ‘‘frivolous application’’ with respect to asylum claims, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2022 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. HAGERTY, and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify 

the meaning of the term ‘‘frivolous application’’ with 

respect to asylum claims, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asylum Integrity Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO FRIVOLOUS 

6 ASYLUM APPLICATIONS. 

7 Section 208(d) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(d)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4637 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (4), in the matter preceding 

2 subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘the Secretary of 

3 Homeland Security or’’ before ‘‘the Attorney Gen4 eral’’; and 

5 (2) by amending paragraph (6)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘If the Attorney General 

7 determines that an alien has knowingly’’ and 

8 inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of 

10 Homeland Security or the Attorney General de11 termines that an alien has’’; and 

12 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(B) DETERMINATION.— 

14 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of 

15 this paragraph, a frivolous application is 

16 an application for asylum that the Sec17 retary of Homeland Security or the Attor18 ney General determines— 

19 ‘‘(I) has been made knowingly by 

20 the applicant; and 

21 ‘‘(II)(aa) includes a fabricated 

22 material element; 

23 ‘‘(bb) is premised on false or fab24 ricated evidence; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4637 IS

1 ‘‘(cc) was filed without regard to 

2 the merits of the claim; or 

3 ‘‘(dd) is clearly foreclosed by ap4 plicable law. 

5 ‘‘(ii) EFFECT OF FINDING.—For pur6 poses of this section, a finding that an 

7 alien has filed a frivolous asylum applica8 tion shall not preclude the alien from seek9 ing withholding of removal under section 

10 241(b)(3) of protection pursuant to the 

11 Convention Against Torture and Other 

12 Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment 

13 or Punishment, done at New York Decem14 ber 10, 1984. 

15 ‘‘(iii) FINDINGS BY ASYLUM OFFI16 CERS.—In adjudicating an affirmative asy17 lum application, if an asylum officer deter18 mines that the application is described in 

19 subclauses (I) and (II) of clause (i), the 

20 asylum officer may— 

21 ‘‘(I) make a finding that the ap22 plication is a frivolous application; 

23 and 

24 ‘‘(II)(aa) in the case of an appli25 cant who is not in lawful status, refer 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 4637 IS

1 the application to an immigration 

2 judge; or 

3 ‘‘(bb) in the case of an applicant 

4 who is in lawful status, deny the ap5 plication.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Detail

# Do the Poor Pay More for Food? Item Selection and Price Differences Affect Low-Income Household Food Costs

Agricultural Economic Report No. (AER-759) 27 pp, December 1997

by Phillip  Kaufman, James M.  MacDonald, Steve M.   Lutz, and David  Smallwood

Low-income households may face higher food prices for three reasons: (1) on average, low-income households may spend less in supermarkets--which typically offer the lowest prices and greatest range of brands, package sizes, and quality choices; (2) low-income households are less likely to live in suburban locations where food prices are typically lower; and (3) supermarkets in low-income neighborhoods may charge higher prices than those in nearby higher income neighborhoods. Despite the prevailing higher prices, surveys of household food expenditures show that low-income households typically spend less than other households, on a per unit basis, for the foods they buy. Low-income households may realize lower costs by selecting more economical foods and lower quality items. In areas where food choices are limited due to the kinds and locations of foodstores, households may have sharply higher food costs.

**Keywords:** food costs, low-income households, food expenditures

**In this publication...**

-  Entire Report 

-  Farm Household Well-being 
-  Food Prices, Expenditures & Costs 

**Last updated:** Monday, December 01, 1997

**For more information contact:** Phillip  Kaufman, James M.  MacDonald, Steve M.   Lutz, and David  Smallwood
ACCEPTED 03-15-00032-CV 5625443 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/10/2015 3:33:49 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK INTHE COURT OFAPPEALS FORTHE 3RDDISTRICT,ATAUSTIN, TEXAS CAUSE NUMBER 03-15-00032-CV SAM LOEB,JR. AND MOSAIC POOL & SPA, INC., APPELLANTS 

## v. CLINTJONES AND ANGIEJONES,APPELLEES APPELLANTS' MOTIONTODISMISS Pursuant to Rule 42, Tex. R. App. Proc., Appellants Sam Loeb, Jr. and Mosaic Pool & Spa, Inc. file this Motionto Dismiss and would showthe Court: 1. All parties to this case have entered into a settlement agreement. 2. Appellants no longer wish to prosecute this appeal and ask that this Court dismiss this proceeding. Respectfully submitted, By: ---""------1 Michael Flo SBN: 07157725 Email: floreanilaw@gmail.com 13500 Ranch Rd. 12, Ste. E Wimberley, TX 78676 Telephone: 722-3692 Facsimile: 532-6594 Attorney for AppellantsCERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I cetiify that on June 10, 2015 I conferred with counsel for Appellees regarding this Motionto Dismiss and the motion is not opposed. 

# '

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I cetiify that on June 10, 2015 a true and correct copy ofAppellants' Motion to Dismiss was served to each person listed below by the method indicated.

Michael F oreani E-mail: floreanilaw@gmail.com

Clint Jones Attorney for Clint Jones and Angie Jones E-mail: clint@thevillageatwolfcreek.com Date: June 10, 2015 Time: 2:52p.m. CST Documentwas Electronically Served, and Electronic Transmission was Repmied as Complete
### §322. Applicability of certain provisions to Pueblo Indians

The provisions of the following statutes:

Sections 311, 319, and 357 of this title;

Sections 312 to 318 of this title;

Section 321 of this title; and

Sections 323 to 328 of this title,

are extended over and made applicable to the Pueblo Indians of New Mexico and their lands, whether owned by the Pueblo Indians or held in trust or set aside for their use and occupancy by Executive order or otherwise, under such rules, regulations, and conditions as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe.

(Apr. 21, 1928, ch. 400, §1, 45 Stat. 442; Pub. L. 94–416, §3, Sept. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 1275.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–416 inserted reference to sections 323 to 328 and 357 of this title with respect to the enumeration of statutes, struck out reference to section 935 of title 43 with respect to the enumeration of statutes, and inserted "whether owned by the Pueblo Indians or held in trust or set aside for their use and occupancy by Executive order or otherwise," after "New Mexico and their lands".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Enforcement functions of Secretary or other official in Department of the Interior relating to compliance with rights-of-way across Indian lands, issued under section 321 et seq. of this title with respect to pre-construction, construction, and initial operation of transportation system for Canadian and Alaskan natural gas transferred to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, until first anniversary of date of initial operation of Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, see Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1979, §§102(e), 203(a), 44 F.R. 33663, 33666, 93 Stat. 1373, 1376, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, effective July 1, 1979, pursuant to Ex. Ord. No. 12142, §1–101, June 21, 1979, 44 F.R. 36927, set out as a note under section 719e of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. Office of Federal Inspector for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System abolished and functions and authority vested in Inspector transferred to Secretary of Energy by section 3012(b) of Pub. L. 102–486, set out as an Abolition of Office of Federal Inspector note under section 719e of Title 15. Functions and authority vested in Secretary of Energy subsequently transferred to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects by section 720d(f) of Title 15.
(No. 1153

Claimant awarded $172.00.)

#### Dr. J. G. Meyer, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 29, 1927.*

Military *service*— when *award may he made.*There being no dispute as to the facts and the law in this case the court enters an award in favor of claimant for the amount of his claim.

William J. Butler, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Merrill F. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

It appears that claimant is and was a regularly licensed physician practicing the profession in the city of Springfield, Illinois, on December 10, 1924, to March 31, 1925. And it further appears that Private Lewis J. Bourland while on regular and order duty, a member of Company C, 130th Infantry, Illinois National Guard, became ill with mumps and the grippe and did receive treatment from said claimant as a physician between said dates and that the amount claimed by *331said claimant for suck treatment is $172.00. It further appears that C. E. Black, Adjutant General, addressed a letter to the Attorney General stating “that the board found that the disability of Private Bourland was incurred in line of duty and recommended that his medical treatment be paid and that claimant was the attending physician and that his bill for such services in the sum of $172.00 has not been paid by the Military and Naval Department.”

. It appears to the court that said claim is just and recommended as aforesaid that it should be allowed. This court recommends that said claim be awarded in the sum of $172.00.
It took strength to serve.

It can seem even harder to ask for help.

Created 09/11

www.va.gov/homeless Working together to eliminate Veteran homelessness.

If you served in the U.S. military and are now facing tough 

times or don’t have a place to call home, VA can help.

Make the call!

Copyright © 2005 Nancy E. Rhodes, nancyerhodes.com

Call VA’s toll-free hotline:

1-877-424-3838

(1-877-4AID-VET)

or visit www.va.gov/homeless for 

help with housing, jobs, health care, 

education and other Veteran benefits.

U.S. Department 

of Veterans Affairs
§ 3137.72 What if reasons beyond my control prevent me from meeting the initial or a continuing development obligation by the time the unit agreement specifies? ( a ) If reasons beyond your control prevent you from meeting the initial or a continuing development obligation by the time specified in the unit agreement, you may apply to BLM for an extension of time for meeting those obligations. You must submit the request for an extension of time before the date the obligation is due to be met. In the application- ( 1 ) State the obligation for which you are requesting an extension;
( 2 ) List the reasons beyond your control that prevent you from performing the obligation; and
( 3 ) State when you expect the reasons beyond your control to terminate.
( b ) BLM will grant an extension of time to meet initial or continuing development obligations if we determine that- ( 1 ) The extension encourages the greatest ultimate recovery of oil or gas or it is in the interest of conservation; and
( 2 ) The reasons beyond your control prevent you from performing the initial or a continuing development obligation.
( c ) The extension of time for performing the initial or a continuing development obligation will continue for so long as the conditions giving rise to the extension continue to exist.
(June 4, 1943.)

#### Rudolph R. Loening et al., Constituting the Charter Commission of the City of Glen Cove, Plaintiffs, v. William H. Seaman et al., Constituting the City Council of the City of Glen Cove, et al., Defendants.

Present—Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
§ 3140.41 Approval of plan of operations (and unit and operating agreements). ( a ) The owner of an oil and gas lease, or the owner of a valid claim based on a mineral location will have such lease or claim converted to a combined hydrocarbon lease when the plan of operations, filed under § 3140.23, is deemed acceptable and is approved by the authorized officer.
( b ) The conversion of a lease within a unit of the National Park System will be approved only with the consent of the Regional Director of the National Park Service in accordance with § 3140.70.
( c ) A plan of operations may not be approved in part but may be approved where it contains an appropriately staged plan of exploration and development operations.
### §677z. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1009, §27, 68 Stat. 878, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to issue rules and regulations necessary to effectuate the purposes of this subchapter and allowed the Secretary to provide for tribal or group referenda on matters pertaining to management or disposition of tribal or group assets, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
                         Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350
                   __________________________________________


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ELECTRONIC SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the
"Report"), I, Barry S. Howe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 15, 2008                         /s/ Barry S. Howe
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Barry S. Howe
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
### §861. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 95–281, §1, May 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 246, which related to Federal recognition of the Wyandotte, Ottawa, and Peoria Tribes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### McWhorter v. Commonwealth.

June 25, 1943.

Sylvester V. Little for appellant.

Hubert Meredith, Attorney General, and W. Owen Keller, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Van Sant, Commissioner

Beversing.

The appeal has been prayed from a judgment of conviction for the unlawful possession of untas paid *858■whiskey in local option territory. The indictment charges the defendant with the offense of “unlawfully and willfully possessing spirituous, vinous, malt or other intoxicating’ liquors, towit: what is commonly known as moonshine liquor, untax paid in local option territory.” The arresting officer testified that on the 23rd day of April, 1943, he arrested the defendant in a drunken condition upon a public highway in Laurel county, and found upon his person less than one-half pint of intoxicating liquor, which was, in his opinion, “moonshine whiskey.” Both federal and state excise tax stamps were affixed to the bottle containing the whiskey.

The indictment fails to charge the whiskey was kept or was being transported for sale. It therefore was not sufficient to charge the defendant with the crime denounced by KRS 242.230 which provides that it shall be unlawful for any person in dry territory to sell, barter, loan, give, procure for or furnish another, or keep or transport for sale any alcoholic beverage. Rowe v. Commonwealth, 283 Ky. 367, 141 S. W. (2d) 284; Baker v. Commonwealth, 284 Ky. 92, 143 S. W. (2d) 842; Howard v. Commonwealth, 285 Ky. 486, 148 S. W. (2d) 336. Nor is the indictment sufficient to charge the defendant with the crime denounced by KRS 243.840 which provides that it shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly possess any alcoholic beverage not bearing the stamp required to evidence tax payment. There being no other provision of the statutes prohibiting the possession or transportation of whiskey, the indictment fails to charge a public offense. That being true, the court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a peremptory instruction. Baker v. Commonwealth, supra.

The judgment is reversed.

Whole court sitting.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 883

 882

 835

 857

 906

 933

 1,003

 1,036

 1,062

 1,071

 1,050

 1,036

 975

 907

 852

 913

 950

 961

 985

 996

 1,022

 1,061

 1,045

 1,053

 1,059

 1,053

 1,068

 1,049

 950

 921

 991

 860

 818

 818

 829

 852

 895

 931

 998

 1,032

 1,046

 992

 978

 910

 821

 799

 846

 919

 928

 963

 968

 984

 1,016

 1,007

 1,020

 1,023

 1,022

 1,031

 971

 854

 860

 928

 867

 843

 828

 845

 865

 909

 955

 1,018

 1,045

 1,060

 1,031

 1,011

 947

 860

 822

 887

 936

 943

 974

 987

 1,010

 1,044

 1,028

 1,030

 1,039

 1,038

 1,047

 1,023

 895

 881

 970

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 10, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 23,522

 23,504

 23,478

 23,456

 23,477

 23,560

 23,656

 23,820

 24,027

 24,247

 24,421

 24,555

 24,660

 24,701

 24,718

 24,883

 25,225

 25,543

 25,852

 26,255

 26,671

 27,094

 27,467

 27,791

 28,057

 28,273

 28,476

 28,640

 28,662

 28,668

 28,771

 784

 783

 783

 782

 783

 785

 789

 794

 801

 808

 814

 819

 822

 823

 824

 829

 841

 851

 862

 875

 889

 903

 916

 926

 935

 942

 949

 955

 955

 956

 959

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §1771h. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–95, §10, Aug. 18, 1987, 101 Stat. 710, which related to limitations of action and jurisdiction, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 2568.79 Are there any rules about the number and size of parcels?

Yes. You may apply for one or two parcels, but if you apply for two parcels the two combined cannot total more than 160 acres. You may apply for less than 160 acres. Each parcel must be reasonably compact.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T34N

T35N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

Cora

Merna

Daniel

Boulder

Pinedale

LaBarge

Marbleton

Big Piney

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 1.5 3 6 9 12 15 18

Miles

Known White-tailed Prairie Dog Towns

White-tailed Prairie Dog Towns

Map 3-22

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers
§ 3212.10 What is the difference between a suspension of operations and production and a suspension of operations? ( a ) A suspension of operations and production is a temporary relief from production obligations which you may request from BLM. Under this paragraph you must cease all operations on your lease.
( b ) A suspension of operations is when BLM orders you, to stop production temporarily in the interest of conservation.
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Didier Pietri, President and Chief Executive Officer of Vialta, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Vialta, Inc. (the “registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;   Date:May 2, 2005 /s/ Didier Pietri   Didier Pietri Chief Executive Officer
- Skip to Primary Navigation
      - Skip to Main Content
      - Skip to Footer

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

        -  Water & Power            - Dams
          - Powerplants
          - Projects
          - Agrimet/Hydromet
          - Water Operations 
        -  Resources & Research            - Programs
          - Technical Service Center
          - Research & Development
          - Reclamation Manual
          - Reclamation Information Sharing Environment (RISE)
          - Environmental Resources/Reports
          - Library 
        -  About Us            - Mission
          - Fact Sheet
          - Commissioner
          - Addresses/Contacts
          - Organizational Chart
          - Leadership Bios
          - Employment
          - Contact 
        -  Recreation & Public Use            - Find Recreation
          - Recreation.gov
          - Public Use 
        -  News & Multimedia            - News Releases
          - News Stories
          - Speeches
          - Congressional Testimony
          - Fact Sheets
          - Photos
          - Multimedia
          - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

              - Reclamation
              - California-Great Basin
              - Central Valley Project Water Supply
              - CVP Water Users/Contractors and Other Sources

Region 10                - Region 10 Home
                - Central Valley Project Water Supply                    - Water Plans
                  - Water Allocations
                  - Water Year Carryovers 
                - About Us
                - Area Offices
                - Programs & Activities
                - Projects & Facilities
                - Central Valley Project
                - Doing Business with Reclamation
                - Public Affairs
                - Employment
                - Recreation
                - Site Index
                - Contact Us

## CVP Water Users/Contractors and Other Sources 

Water Related Rosters/Contractors/Points of Contact
            - Ag Contractors  (PDF - 23 KB)
            - M&I Contractors  (PDF - 16 KB)
            - Water Users  (PDF - 2.1 MB)
            - CVP Water Contractors  (PDF - 154 KB)

 Reclamation Interior Region 10 Related Links
            - Water Allocation 
            - Drought Kiosk
            - Water Operations 
*Note:  Documents in Portable Document Format (PDF) require Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher to view, download Adobe Acrobat Reader*
 

*Last Updated: 3/4/22*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   
            -   

            - Contact Us
            - Site Index
            - Accessibility
            - Disclaimer
            - DOI
            - FOIA
            - No Fear Act
            - Notices
            - Privacy Policy
            - Quality of Information
            - Recreation.gov
            - USA.gov