alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 683.510 What is a Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Pay-for-Performance contract? ( a ) *Pay-for-Performance contract.* A WIOA Pay-for-Performance contract is a type of Performance-Based contract.
( b ) *Applicability.* WIOA Pay-for-Performance contracts may only be entered into when they are a part of a WIOA Pay-for-Performance contract strategy described in § 683.500.
( c ) *Cost-plus a percentage of cost contracts.* Use of cost plus a percentage of cost contracts is prohibited. (2 CFR 200.323.)
( d ) *Services provided.* WIOA Pay-for-Performance contracts must be used to provide adult training services described in sec. 134(c)(3) of WIOA or youth activities described in sec. 129(c)(2) of WIOA.
( e ) *Structure of payment.* WIOA Pay-for-Performance contracts must specify a fixed amount that will be paid to the service provider based on the achievement of specified levels of performance on the performance outcomes in sec. 116(b)(2)(A) of WIOA for target populations within a defined timetable. Outcomes must be independently validated, as described in paragraph (j) of this section and § 683.500, prior to disbursement of funds.
( f ) *Eligible service providers.* WIOA Pay-for-Performance contracts may be entered into with eligible service providers, which may include local or national community-based organizations or intermediaries, community colleges, or other training providers that are eligible under sec. 122 or 123 of WIOA (as appropriate).
( g ) *Target populations.* WIOA Pay-for-Performance contracts must identify target populations as specified by the Local WDB, which may include individuals with barriers to employment.
( h ) *Bonus payments.* WIOA Pay-for-Performance contracts may include bonus payments for the contractor based on achievement of specified levels of performance. Bonus payments for achieving outcomes above and beyond those specified in the contract must be used by the service provider to expand capacity to provide effective training.
( i ) *Performance reporting.* Performance outcomes achieved under the WIOA Pay-for-Performance contract, measured against the levels of performance specified in the contract, must be tracked by the local area and reported to the State pursuant to WIOA sec. 116(d)(2)(K) and § 677.160 of this chapter.
( j ) *Validation.* WIOA Pay-for-Performance contracts must include independent validation of the contractor's achievement of the performance benchmarks specified in the contract. This validation must be based on high-quality, reliable, and verified data.
( k ) *Guidance.* The Secretary may issue additional guidance related to use of WIOA Pay-for-Performance contracts.
### SUBCHAPTER XXX–E—COQUILLE INDIAN TRIBE OF OREGON: RESTORATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1903

CHARLES WILLIAM LEVY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF

ELECTIONS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-02-283-A)

Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 30, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles William Levy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles William Levy appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action against the Virginia State Board of

Elections. Our review of the record and the district court’s

opinion adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation discloses no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Levy v. State Bd. of Elections, No. CA-02-283-

A (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 2, 2002 & entered Aug. 6, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §450h. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 450h was editorially reclassified as section 5322 of this title.
### §175. United States attorneys to represent Indians

In all States and Territories where there are reservations or allotted Indians the United States attorney shall represent them in all suits at law and in equity.

(Mar. 3, 1893, ch. 209, §1, 27 Stat. 631; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 909.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States attorney" substituted in text for "United States district attorney" on authority of act June 25, 1948. See section 541 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  annual  Report of  Foresight  Specialists,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kevin Ericksteen,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                  ---------------------------
Date: March 27, 2006                                  Kevin Ericksteen
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

the evening prior to the incident. We conclude that the evidence 

supporting this conviction, when viewed in the light most favorable to the 

prosecution, is sufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt as 

determined by a rational trier of fact. See NRS 200.366(1); Jackson v. 

Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); McNair v. State, 108 Nev. 53, 56, 825 

P.2d 571, 573 (1992). 

Appellant also claims that his verdicts of guilty as to the 

sexual assault charge and not guilty as to the burglary charge are 

inconsistent and are not rationally reconcilable, and therefore they cannot 

stand. We have held that inconsistent verdicts are permitted when 

supported by sufficient evidence. See Greene v. State, 113 Nev. 157, 173- 

74, 931 P.2d 54, 64 (1997), receded from on other grounds by Byford v. 

State, 116 Nev. 215, 235, 994 P.2d 700, 713 (2000). As we have resolved 

appellant's sufficiency challenge against him, we conclude his claim of 

inconsistent verdicts is without merit. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

,J. 

cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge 

Scott W. Edwards 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22007]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 15, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. Anthony S. DiSandro, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania; to acquire voting 
shares of PSB Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of First Penn Bank, both of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 27, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-22007 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
### §1662. Automated management information system

#### (a) Establishment

(1) The Secretary shall establish an automated management information system for the Service.

(2) The information system established under paragraph (1) shall include—

(A) a financial management system,

(B) a patient care information system for each area served by the Service,

(C) a privacy component that protects the privacy of patient information held by, or on behalf of, the Service, and

(D) a services-based cost accounting component that provides estimates of the costs associated with the provision of specific medical treatments or services in each area office of the Service.

#### (b) Provision to Indian tribes and organizations; reimbursement

(1) The Secretary shall provide each Indian tribe and tribal organization that provides health services under a contract entered into with the Service under the Indian Self-Determination Act [25 U.S.C. 5321 et seq.] automated management information systems which—

(A) meet the management information needs of such Indian tribe or tribal organization with respect to the treatment by the Indian tribe or tribal organization of patients of the Service, and

(B) meet the management information needs of the Service.

(2) The Secretary shall reimburse each Indian tribe or tribal organization for the part of the cost of the operation of a system provided under paragraph (1) which is attributable to the treatment by such Indian tribe or tribal organization of patients of the Service.

(3) The Secretary shall provide systems under paragraph (1) to Indian tribes and tribal organizations providing health services in California by no later than September 30, 1990.

#### (c) Access to records

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, each patient shall have reasonable access to the medical or health records of such patient which are held by, or on behalf of, the Service.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title VI, §602, as added Pub. L. 100–713, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4825; amended Pub. L. 102–573, title IX, §901(3), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4591.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Indian Self-Determination Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is title I of Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2206, which is classified principally to subchapter I (§5321 et seq.) of chapter 46 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 102–573 struck out par. (3) which directed Secretary to submit report to Congress no later than Sept. 30, 1989.
EXHIBIT 27.1 - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

FISCAL-YEAR-END                                    DEC-31-2000
PERIOD-END                                         SEP-30-2000
CASH                                               384,846,077
SECURITIES                                                   0
RECEIVABLES                                      1,687,384,126
ALLOWANCES                                          74,775,826
INVENTORY                                                    0
CURRENT-ASSETS                                   2,328,161,209
PP&E                                             4,912,963,027
DEPRECIATION                                       681,349,006
TOTAL-ASSETS                                    50,750,087,065
CURRENT-LIABILITIES                              2,483,740,145
BONDS                                            8,036,488,288
PREFERRED-MANDATORY                                          0
PREFERRED                                                    0
COMMON                                              58,474,190
OTHER-SE                                        30,530,270,952
TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY                      50,750,087,065
SALES                                                        0
TOTAL-REVENUES                                   3,343,169,699
CGS                                                          0
TOTAL-COSTS                                      2,144,974,228
OTHER-EXPENSES                                     117,969,958
LOSS-PROVISION                                               0
INTEREST-EXPENSE                                   230,794,687
INCOME-PRETAX                                      831,394,320
INCOME-TAX                                         408,670,396
INCOME-CONTINUING                                  440,760,430
DISCONTINUED                                                 0
EXTRAORDINARY                                                0
CHANGES                                                      0
NET-INCOME                                         440,760,430
EPS-BASIC                                                 1.19
EPS-DILUTED                                               1.13
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Report on inspections for compliancewith the public access provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act:conducted under section 210 of the Congressional Accountability Act.
 
107th| 108th
 
SuDoc Number:Y 11.20:
Item Number:1089-Z-12 (online)
CGP System Number:001031055
 
October 5, 2017
 
 **
### §663. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–507, §5, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 861, which authorized Secretary of the Interior to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of former sections 659 to 663 of this title, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 802.213 Reply briefs. ( a ) Within 20 days after the receipt of a brief, memorandum, or statement submitted in response to the petition for review pursuant to § 802.212, any party upon whom it was served may file a brief, memorandum, or other statement in reply to it.
( b ) Arguments in reply briefs shall be limited to those which reply to arguments made in the response brief. Any other arguments in a reply brief will not be considered by the Board.
July 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* FROM JUDGE CLEAR CR. RELEASE - C.F.S.

 1000 ACRE -FEET INFLOW FRANCIS NATURAL TO CLEAR CR. TO SPRING EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. CARR PP FLOW SPILL OUTLET

** CR. PP C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

237.5

1 1,208.96 237.8 0.29 836 686 150 0 157 535 0 0.00 0.00

2 1,208.90 237.6 -0.19 672 531 141 0 157 574 37 0.39 0.00

3 1,208.90 237.6 0.00 772 643 129 0 157 579 36 0.38 0.00

4 1,208.94 237.7 0.13 761 602 159 0 159 502 36 0.38 0.00

5 1,208.91 237.6 -0.10 663 532 131 0 160 515 36 0.38 0.00

6 1,208.66 236.8 -0.80 360 255 105 0 159 569 33 0.35 0.00

7 1,208.53 236.4 -0.41 531 452 79 0 160 547 32 0.34 0.00

8 1,208.58 236.6 0.16 740 625 115 0 160 500 0 0.00 0.00

9 1,208.58 236.6 0.00 695 596 99 0 163 506 26 0.28 0.00

10 1,208.48 236.2 -0.32 539 400 139 0 160 509 30 0.32 0.00

11 1,208.57 236.5 0.29 895 763 132 0 160 560 31 0.33 0.00

12 1,208.47 236.2 -0.32 526 395 131 0 160 491 35 0.37 0.00

13 1,208.87 237.5 1.27 1,326 1,166 160 0 159 493 33 0.35 0.00

14 1,209.14 238.3 0.86 1,169 974 195 0 159 543 33 0.35 0.00

15 1,209.16 238.4 0.06 892 809 83 0 159 701 0 0.00 0.00

16 1,209.26 238.7 0.32 909 723 186 0 160 550 38 0.40 0.00

17 1,209.14 238.3 -0.38 347 265 82 0 160 337 44 0.47 0.00

18 1,208.87 237.5 -0.86 66 25 41 0 159 305 36 0.38 0.00

19 1,208.77 237.2 -0.32 407 308 99 0 159 370 38 0.41 0.00

20 1,209.00 237.9 0.73 872 757 115 0 159 309 35 0.37 0.00

21 1,209.02 238.0 0.06 791 702 89 0 160 563 36 0.38 0.00

22 1,209.11 238.2 0.29 781 676 105 0 160 430 46 0.49 0.00

23 1,209.12 238.3 0.03 780 705 75 0 160 563 41 0.44 0.00

24 1,209.17 238.4 0.16 754 652 102 0 159 491 23 0.25 0.00

25 1,209.19 238.5 0.06 726 624 102 0 159 501 34 0.36 0.00

26 1,209.02 238.0 -0.54 541 491 50 0 159 622 34 0.36 0.00

27 1,208.94 237.7 -0.26 577 502 75 0 158 516 32 0.34 0.00

28 1,208.99 237.9 0.16 771 671 100 0 158 500 33 0.35 0.00

29 1,209.06 238.1 0.22 785 688 97 0 158 483 31 0.33 0.00

30 1,209.08 238.2 0.06 577 488 89 0 158 355 32 0.34 0.00

31 1,209.06 238.1 -0.06 641 555 86 0 158 483 32 0.34 0.00

TOTALS 0.59 21,702 18,261 3,441 0 4,933 15,502 963 10.23 0.00

ACRE-FEET 590 43,046 36,221 6,825 0 9,785 30,748 1,910

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

** WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 30,748 Outlet 9,785

Spill 0

Total 40533

Precipitation

This month = 0.00

October 01, 2022 To date = 70.97

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Whiskeytown Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 8/10/2023
### §§531 to 535. Repealed. Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §12, 68 Stat. 721

Sections 531 to 535, act Aug. 28, 1937, ch. 874, §§2–6, 50 Stat. 872, 873, related to revolving loan fund.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §12, 68 Stat. 721, provided that the repeal is effective on the date of the transfer of title to tribal property to a trustee, corporation, or other legal entity pursuant to former section 564e of this title.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129722 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129722 

 COA: 262239 

Washtenaw CC: 02-1337-FH 

BRANDON BERNARD FORTSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
### §8794. Waiver

The President may waive the requirement to include a person on a list required by section 8791, 8792, or 8793 of this title or to impose sanctions pursuant to any such section if the President—

(1) determines that such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States; and

(2) submits to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the reasons for that determination.

(Pub. L. 112–158, title VII, §705, Aug. 10, 2012, 126 Stat. 1268.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section, see section 8795 of this title.
§ 2450.1 Filing of petition. ( a ) When ( 1 ) land must be classified or designated pursuant to the authorities cited in § 2400.0-3 before an application may be approved and
( 2 ) the filing of applications is permitted prior to classification, the application together with a petition for classification on a form approved by the Director (hereinafter referred to collectively as a *petition-application*) must be filed in accordance with the provisions of § 1821.2 of this chapter. Lists indicating the proper office for filing of applications may be obtained from the Director or any other officer of the Bureau of Land Management. Copies of the petition for classification form and the application forms may be obtained from the proper offices or from the Bureau of Land Management, Washington, DC 20240.
§ 3192.1 What is a cooperative agreement? ( a ) A cooperative agreement is a contract between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and a Tribe or State to conduct inspection, investigation, or enforcement activities on producing Indian Tribal or allotted oil and gas leases.
( b ) BLM will enter into a cooperative agreement with a State to inspect oil and gas leases on Indian lands only with the permission of the Tribe with jurisdiction over the lands.
377 P.2d 100

#### James C. LATTIN, Petitioner, v. The FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Santa Fe, New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 14 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 3, 1963.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the request for free process be and the same is hereby granted, and the petition for writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied for the reason that the case is pending before the Hon. James M. Scarborough who has appointed counsel for the petitioner.