alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 506.33

 506.18

 505.94

 506.51

 506.60

 506.27

 505.92

 505.57

 504.89

 504.49

 503.98

 503.41

 502.80

 502.62

 503.00

 502.84

 503.42

 503.80

 503.69

 503.54

 503.24

 503.21

 503.34

 503.75

 504.39

 505.04

 504.35

 503.61

 502.81

 502.64

 502.46

 62,477

 62,298

 62,012

 62,692

 62,799

 62,405

 61,989

 61,577

 60,780

 60,317

 59,727

 59,077

 58,386

 58,184

 58,610

 58,431

 59,089

 59,522

 59,397

 59,226

 58,884

 58,849

 58,998

 59,465

 60,201

 60,954

 60,155

 59,305

 58,397

 58,207

 58,005

STORAGE

-466

-179

-286

+680

+107

-394

-416

-412

-797

-463

-590

-650

-691

-202

+426

-179

+658

+433

-125

-171

-342

-35

+149

+467

+736

+753

-799

-850

-908

-190

-202

CHANGE

413

517

375

878

602

325

345

307

128

308

321

369

364

561

842

972

1,611

1,164

833

757

810

1,274

1,330

1,433

1,178

881

315

256

423

1,029

887

INFLOW

 636

 594

 508

 525

 537

 514

 547

 507

 522

 534

 609

 689

 701

 655

 617

 1,052

 1,268

 938

 891

 838

 976

 1,289

 1,255

 1,195

 801

 499

 715

 682

 877

 1,031

 985

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 90

 0

OUTLET

 12

 13

 11

 10

 11

 10

 8

 8

 8

 7

 9

 8

 11

 8

 10

 10

 11

 8

 5

 5

 6

 3

 0

 3

 6

 2

 3

 3

 4

 4

 4

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2021 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/18/2021

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -4,938 21,808 23,987 0 90 221

ACRE-FEET -4,938 43,256 47,578 0 179 438

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 47,578

SPILL 0 47,757

 62,943

OUTLET 179

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 418

 521

 364

 865

 601

 328

 346

 305

 138

 309

 329

 375

 373

 570

 848

 960

 1,620

 1,145

 842

 756

 799

 1,247

 1,338

 1,358

 794

 844

 325

 262

 421

 1,036

 893

 21,330

 42,308

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM NEW MELONES PAN.
§ 3283.2 When may the unit operator revise the unit contraction provision of a unit agreement? ( a ) The unit operator may submit to BLM a request to revise the unit contraction provision of a unit agreement, if the unit operator has either: ( 1 ) Commenced commercial operations of unitized resources; or
( 2 ) Completed a unit well that produces or utilizes geothermal resources in commercial quantities.
( b ) The request may propose an extension of the unit contraction date and/or a partial contraction of the unit area, and must include the following information: ( 1 ) The period for which the revision is requested; and
( 2 ) Whether an extension of the unit contraction date and/or a partial contraction of the unit area is requested.
( c ) The request should address the following factors when applicable: ( 1 ) Economic constraints that limit the opportunity to drill and utilize the resource from additional wells;
( 2 ) Reservoir monitoring or injection wells that BLM determines are necessary for unit operations are not located in the participating area;
( 3 ) An inability to drill additional wells is due to circumstances beyond the unit operator's control, and a unit well that has produced or utilized in commercial quantities already is located in the unit;
( 4 ) The types and intensity of unit operations already conducted in the unit area;
( 5 ) The availability of viable electrical or resource sales contracts;
( 6 ) The opportunity to utilize the resource economically; or
( 7 ) Any other information that supports revision of the unit contraction provision.
( d ) BLM will consider the factors discussed along with any other information submitted, and will approve the request if we determine that the revision is in the public interest. The approval may be subject to conditions such as requiring an annual renewal, or setting the timing and conditions for when phased contractions or termination of the revision may occur.
### §253. Wines for sacramental purposes

It shall not be unlawful to introduce and use wines solely for sacramental purposes, under church authority, at any place within the Indian country or any Indian reservation, including the Pueblo Reservations in New Mexico.

(Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 388, §1, 37 Stat. 519.)
§ 3178.4 Uses of oil or gas on a lease, unit, or communitized area that do not require prior written BLM approval for royalty-free treatment of volumes used. ( a ) Oil or gas produced from a lease, unit, or communitized area may be used royalty-free for operations and production purposes on the lease, unit, or communitized area without prior written BLM approval in the following circumstances: ( 1 ) Use of fuel to generate power or operate combined heat and power;
( 2 ) Use of fuel to power equipment, including artificial lift equipment, equipment used for enhanced recovery, drilling rigs, and completion and workover equipment;
( 3 ) Use of gas to actuate pneumatic controllers or operate pneumatic pumps at production facilities;
( 4 ) Use of fuel to heat, separate, or dehydrate production;
( 5 ) Use of gas as a pilot fuel or as assist gas for a flare, combustor, thermal oxidizer, or other control device;
( 6 ) Use of fuel to compress or treat gas to place it in marketable condition;
( 7 ) Use of oil to clean the well and improve production, *e.g.,* hot oil treatments. The operator must document the removal of the oil from the tank or pipeline under Onshore Oil and Gas Order No. 3 (Site Security), or any successor regulation;
( 8 ) Use of oil as a circulating medium in drilling operations, if the use is part of an approved Drilling Plan under Onshore Oil and Gas Order No. 1;
( 9 ) Injection of gas for the purpose of conserving gas or increasing the recovery of oil or gas, if the BLM has approved the injection under applicable regulations in parts 3100, 3160, or 3180 of this title; and
( 10 ) Injection of gas that is cycled in a contained gas-lift system.
( b ) The volume to be treated as royalty free must not exceed the amount of fuel reasonably necessary to perform the operational function, using equipment of appropriate capacity.
#### Lee A. Ochs v. Albert H. Woods.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present-—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000                
                                 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                             34                    
<SECURITIES>                        0             
<RECEIVABLES>                    6237           
<ALLOWANCES>                      397             
<INVENTORY>                      1275            
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 7666             
<PP&E>                          11434            
<DEPRECIATION>                   8694             
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  25531              
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           10988             
<BONDS>                             0        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0        
<PREFERRED>                         0        
<COMMON>                         8331              
<OTHER-SE>                       5394         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    25531              
<SALES>                         21569            
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                21569              
<CGS>                           13477             
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   20990               
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0           
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                444            
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   135            
<INCOME-TAX>                        0         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               135             
<DISCONTINUED>                      0           
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0         
<CHANGES>                           0           
<NET-INCOME>                      135            
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     .00          
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .00           
        



</TABLE>
### §5354. Rules and regulations

#### (a) Prerequisites for promulgation

(1) Within six months from January 4, 1975, the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, consult with national and regional Indian organizations with experiences in Indian education to consider and formulate appropriate rules and regulations to implement the provisions of this subchapter.

(2) Within seven months from January 4, 1975, the Secretary shall present the proposed rules and regulations to the Committees on Interior and Insular Affairs of the United States Senate and House of Representatives.

(3) Within eight months from January 4, 1975, the Secretary shall publish proposed rules and regulations in the Federal Register for the purpose of receiving comments from interested parties.

(4) Within ten months from January 4, 1975, the Secretary shall promulgate rules and regulations to implement the provisions of this subchapter.

#### (b) Revision and amendment

The Secretary is authorized to revise and amend any rules or regulations promulgated pursuant to subsection (a) of this section: Provided, That prior to any revision or amendment to such rules or regulations the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, consult with appropriate national and regional Indian organizations, and shall publish any proposed revisions in the Federal Register not less than sixty days prior to the effective date of such rules and regulations in order to provide adequate notice to, and receive comments from, other interested parties.

(Pub. L. 93–638, title II, §207, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 458c of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the Senate abolished and replaced by Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, effective Feb. 11, 1977. See Rule XXV of Standing Rules of the Senate, as amended by Senate Resolution No. 4, Ninety-fifth Congress (popularly cited as the "Committee System Reorganization Amendments of 1977"), approved Feb. 4, 1977. Section 105 of Senate Resolution No. 4 established a temporary Select Committee on Indian Affairs having jurisdiction over matters relating to Indian affairs (such matters previously having been within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs). Senate Resolution No. 127, June 6, 1984, Ninety-eighth Congress, established the Select Committee on Indian Affairs as a permanent committee of the Senate, and section 25 of Senate Resolution No. 71, Feb. 25, 1993, One Hundred Third Congress, redesignated the Select Committee on Indian Affairs as the Committee on Indian Affairs.

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.
EXHIBIT 31.2


                                 Powerlinx, Inc.
              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302

I, Mark J. Meagher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Powerlinx, Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)        Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  or caused  such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          registrant including its consolidated subsidiary,  is made known to us
          by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

b)        Evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)        Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most  recent  fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is
          reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(c)       All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          control  over  financial  reporting  which  are  reasonably  likely to
          adversely  affect  the  registrant's   ability  to  record,   process,
          summarize and report financial information; and

(d)       Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2005

 /s/ Mark J. Meagher
--------------------
Mark J. Meagher
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 3.7 Permit to become void.

Failure to begin work under a permit within 6 months after it is granted, or failure to diligently prosecute such work after it has been begun, shall make the permit void without any order or proceeding by the Secretary having jurisdiction.
White & Case LLP
                           1155 Avenue of the Americas
                            New York, New York 10036



September 6, 2001


Aphton Corporation
80 S.W. 8th Street
Miami, Florida  33130-3047

Ladies and Gentlemen:

          We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (the
"Registration Statement") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), in the form in which it is to be filed by Aphton Corporation
(the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"),
in connection with the sale from time to time by the selling stockholders named
in the Registration Statement (the "Selling Stockholders") of up to 1,187,503
shares of common stock, $.001 par value, of the Company (the "Resale Shares").
The Company originally sold the Resale Shares pursuant to Stock Purchase
Agreements dated as of August 24, 2001 by and among the Company and the Selling
Stockholders.

          In connection with our opinion expressed below, we have examined
originals or copies certified to our satisfaction of such agreements, documents,
certificates and other statements of government officials and corporate officers
of the Company and such other papers as we have deemed relevant and necessary as
a basis for such opinion. As to certain facts material to our opinion, we have
relied, to the extent that we deem such reliance proper, upon certificates of
public officials and of officers of the Company. In rendering such opinion, we
have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the authenticity of all
documents submitted to us as originals and the conformity to authentic original
documents of all documents submitted to us as certified, conformed or
photostatic copies.

          Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that the
Resale Shares have been validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable.

          The opinion expressed above is limited to questions arising under the
Federal law of the United States and the General Corporate Law of the State of
Delaware.

          We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm appearing under the
caption "Legal Matters" in the Prospectus forming part of the Registration
Statement. In giving this consent, we do not thereby admit that we are within
the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the
Securities Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission.

                                                  Very truly yours,

                                                  /s/  WHITE & CASE LLP
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129722 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129722 COA: 262239 Washtenaw CC: 02-1337-FH BRANDON BERNARD FORTSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
May 10,2012 Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential AirService Division Office ofAviation Analysis Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE, Washington, D.C. 20590 Reference; DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, 2000-7856 Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS, Tupelo, MS and Muscle Shoals, AL EAS Dear Mr. DeVany, Sleep Outfitters ofAlabama dba Mattress King in Florence Alabama wishes to lend its support to the proposal of Silver Airways to provide essential air service at Muscle Shoals as replacement for current Delta Air Lines service. Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air transportation system is critical to the economic well being of Florence, AL and to Mattress King in Florence, AL. 1/we Mattress King rely on our local airservice for both business and leisure travel. The SilverAirways proposals offer us a modern 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights toAtlanta, which is not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure travel destination from the entire'Shoals area in its own right. We believe the Silver air service proposals represent the best option for retaining our local air service longterm and building uptraffic so thatgovernmentsubsidies can eventually be reduced oreliminated. 1/we urge the DepartmentofTransportation toaward SilverAirways the designation to providethe Shoals Area essential airservice. 

# ;p;s, tJWtJA?(_

StacyO'Ha/ Store Manager Mattress King ofFlorence Alabama
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,199.11

 1,200.63

 1,201.80

 1,202.27

 1,201.81

 1,201.88

 1,201.79

 1,201.71

 1,201.64

 1,201.54

 1,201.30

 1,200.66

 1,200.64

 1,201.23

 1,201.30

 1,201.74

 1,202.07

 1,201.27

 1,201.42

 1,201.29

 1,200.68

 1,200.26

 1,200.21

 1,199.94

 1,201.59

 1,205.96

 1,211.89

 1,211.74

 207.5

 212.0

 215.5

 217.0

 215.6

 215.8

 215.5

 215.3

 215.1

 214.7

 214.0

 212.1

 212.0

 213.8

 214.0

 215.4

 216.3

 213.9

 214.4

 214.0

 212.2

 210.9

 210.8

 209.9

 214.9

 228.3

 247.2

 246.7

STORAGE

+0.3

+4.5

+3.5

+1.4

-1.4

+0.2

-0.3

-0.2

-0.2

-0.3

-0.7

-1.9

-0.1

+1.8

+0.2

+1.3

+1.0

-2.4

+0.5

-0.4

-1.8

-1.3

-0.1

-0.8

+5.0

+13.4

+18.9

-0.5

CHANGE

743

3,066

2,361

1,869

1,190

894

837

606

612

475

437

631

1,209

2,546

2,005

1,500

1,244

904

879

778

686

617

644

725

3,405

7,433

12,086

6,088

INFLOW

 327

 538

 340

 906

 1,647

 542

 729

 481

 469

 382

 556

 1,355

 990

 1,404

 1,654

 585

 494

 1,877

 406

 731

 1,363

 1,003

 470

 887

 663

 428

 1,692

 2,973

PP

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 618

 3,116

SPILL

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

OUTLETS

 6

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 2

 4

 0

 1

 0

 4

 4

 0

 0

 2

 0

 0

 0

 2

 3

 4

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .02

 .04

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .04

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

March 1, 2019

FEBRUARY 2019 WHISKEYTOWN LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS

RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAP.

C.F.S. * FRANCIS

COMPUTED

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +39.6 56,470 6,860 3,734 25,892 34 .36

ACRE-FEET +39.6 112,008 13,607 7,406 51,357 67

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 51,357

SPILL 7,406 72,370

 207.2

OUTLET 13,607

TOTAL

JUDGE

CARR PP

(1)

 319

 335

 234

 330

 102

 33

 103

 32

 32

 32

 34

 37

 46

 102

 232

 44

 33

 32

 32

 32

 38

 39

 61

 33

 239

 328

 418

 182

 3,514

 6,970

FROM

TO

SPRING CR.

TO CLEAR CR.

CLEAR

CR.

NATURAL

FLOW

 424

 2,731

 2,127

 1,539

 1,088

 861

 734

 574

 580

 443

 403

 594

 1,163

 2,444

 1,773

 1,456

 1,211

 872

 847

 746

 648

 578

 583

 692

 3,166

 7,105

 11,668

 5,906

 52,956

 105,038

 .00

 2.72

 1.23

 .76

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .36

 .07

 .00

 .00

 3.17

 1.16

 .13

 .06

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .03

 2.80

 5.95

 8.75

 .40

 27.63

PRECIP

INCHES

PRECIPITATION

 27.63

 58.45

THIS MONTH

JULY 1, 2018 TO DATE

Table 5 

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE 58.45
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 6, 2019

No. 04-18-00103-CV

WESTWIND HOMES d/b/a Westwind Development, G.P.-Laredo, LLC, and Centerpoint 

Energy Resources Corp,

Appellants

v.

Fernando RAMIREZ and Minerva Ramirez,

Appellees

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT003262-D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

appellant’s brief is due on or before August 30, 2019. No further extensions absent extraordinary 

circumstances.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of August, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court