alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CVPIA Habitat Restoration Program ((b)(1) “other”)

FY20 Projects

Project Proposed Activity Funding

Alkali Scrub and Bakersfield 

Cactus Habitat 

Enhancement at Panorama 

Vista Preserve

River Partners

Habitat restoration of about 300 acres 

of native alkali scrub shrublands, and 

propagation and installation of 

Bakersfield cactus.

*$499,994

Caliente Property 

Acquisition Land Protection 

Project

Center for Natural Lands 

Management

Fee title acquisition of 71 acres of 

remnant San Joaquin Valley sand dune 

habitat adjacent to CNLM’s San Ridge 

Preserve which will expand the 

Preserve. Just east of Bakersfield, the 

Preserve supports one of the largest 

populations of endangered Bakersfield

cactus, and also supports the only 

known population of the San Joaquin 

Valley giant flower-loving fly.

**$307,507

Tulare Basin Endangered 

Species Surveys

CSU Stanislaus ESRP

In preparation for CVPCP-funded 

habitat restoration at Kern and Pixley 

NWRs and at BLM’s Atwell Island 

Project, project areas will be surveyed 

for San Joaquin kit fox, Tipton 

kangaroo rat, blunt-nosed leopard 

lizard, and Kern mallow for 

Endangered Species Act compliance.

**$75,273

Boeger Tract Riparian 

Habitat Restoration

The Nature Conservancy

The goals of the project are to: (1) 

complete remaining permitting tasks; 

(2) replace 51 acres of flood-prone 

agricultural land with native riparian 

habitat; and (3) use acoustic 

monitoring to collect baseline data on 

riparian songbird species.

**$100,771

2020 funds are 

provided for Task 

(1). Future funds 

will be provided 

for Tasks (2) and 

(3) as available. 

Riparian Habitat Restoration 

at Dos Rios Ranch 

River Partners

Additional funds to complete 

restoration of 159 acres of farmland to 

native riparian habitat to benefit 

riparian brush rabbit, riparian woodrat, 

least Bell’s vireo, and valley elderberry 

longhorn beetle. Elevated mounds will 

also be constructed to provide refuge 

for wildlife during flooding.

**$55,221
Project Costs USFWS

BOR

$499,994 $538,772

Program Operational 

Costs 

USFWS

BOR

$250,006 $211,228

Total Program 

Expenditures 

USFWS 

BOR

 $750,000 $750,000

*USFWS-funded

**BOR-funded
#### President and Directors of Manhattan Company, as Trustee, Appellant-Respondent, v. Oscar Eklandsen, Respondent, and Amy L. Erlandsen, Respondent-Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Cars-well, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
#### Morris Landa, Respondent, v. Lazarus Tarushkin et al., Appellants.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell,, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 500.00

 500.22

 500.34

 500.51

 500.59

 500.36

 500.13

 499.82

 498.81

 498.40

 499.45

 499.77

 500.34

 499.25

 500.21

 500.63

 501.02

 500.42

 500.36

 500.66

 500.95

 500.83

 500.80

 500.68

 500.52

 500.20

 500.74

 500.46

 500.80

 501.00

 500.91

 55,303

 55,541

 55,672

 55,856

 55,943

 55,693

 55,444

 55,111

 54,036

 53,605

 54,716

 55,058

 55,672

 54,503

 55,531

 55,986

 56,409

 55,758

 55,693

 56,018

 56,333

 56,203

 56,170

 56,040

 55,867

 55,520

 56,105

 55,802

 56,170

 56,387

 56,289

STORAGE

+128

+238

+131

+184

+87

-250

-249

-333

-1,075

-431

+1,111

+342

+614

-1,169

+1,028

+455

+423

-651

-65

+325

+315

-130

-33

-130

-173

-347

+585

-303

+368

+217

-98

CHANGE

682

743

698

716

671

495

492

446

68

390

1,298

953

1,337

569

1,684

1,397

1,386

843

1,134

1,330

1,334

1,121

1,174

1,126

1,109

1,018

1,478

1,041

1,377

1,303

1,143

INFLOW

 616

 620

 629

 620

 625

 619

 616

 611

 609

 606

 735

 780

 1,023

 1,156

 1,166

 1,167

 1,173

 1,171

 1,167

 1,164

 1,174

 1,184

 1,190

 1,192

 1,195

 1,191

 1,180

 1,192

 1,190

 1,193

 1,190

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 1

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 3

 1

 1

 3

 1

 4

 2

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 2

 1

 3

 1

 0

 1

 2

 3

 2

 1

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2006 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 04/11/2007

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,114 30,556 29,944 0 0 51

ACRE-FEET +1,114 60,608 59,394 0 0 101

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 59,394

SPILL 0 59,394

 55,175

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 567

 633

 633

 633

 633

 495

 495

 473

 10

 323

 1,232

 891

 1,331

 431

 1,306

 1,308

 1,308

 755

 1,041

 1,315

 1,284

 1,119

 1,173

 1,115

 1,125

 1,009

 1,328

 1,016

 1,349

 1,298

 1,103

 28,732

 56,990

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
Name: Kevin Kauffman, General Manager

Organization and Address: Stockton East Water District

Post Office Box 5157

Stockton, CA 95205-0157

Phone: 209.948.0333 Fax: 209.948.0423 Email: kkauffman@sewd.net

Date: August 9, 2012

The following are the preliminary general comments of Stockton East Water District on the Central Valley 

Project Cost Allocation Study. Stockton East will provide more specific comments as the details of the study 

and analysis are made available. 

Generally, Stockton East is concerned that the cost allocations for the New Melones Project are made in an 

equitable manner. Water use from New Melones has changed substantially over the years, and markedly 

differs from the uses envisioned by Congress when the project was authorized. The cost-allocation study 

should recognize and accommodate these changed priorities and uses, and the diminished ability of the 

project to meet its water supply function.

Stockton East would also request a meeting to discuss issues that are directly related to the New Melones 

Project. For example, we would like to understand the process for the pending determination on whether 

or not New Melones is eligible for a cost allocation update. In addition, we would like to understand why 

water quality releases from New Melones are deemed non-reimbursable and assigned to the water quality 

purpose for the New Melones Unit, and how the water quality purposes for that project are determined.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40254 Conference Calendar

MANLEY CARGILL, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus MARVIN D. MORRISON, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CV-794

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Manley Cargill, federal prisoner # 41436-004, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged his convictions for a continuing criminal enterprise and drug conspiracies pursuant to Rutledge v. United
States , 517 U.S. 292 (1996). Cargill cannot establish that he meets the standard for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition under the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because Rutledge was available at the time Cargill filed his first 28 U.S.C. § 2255No. 03-40254 -2- motion. See Reyes-Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Cargill is incorrect in his assertion that Rutledge was unavailable at the time he filed his first 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion because such a claim would have been untimely. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ¶ 6; United States v. Flores , 135 F.3d 1000, 1005-06 (5th Cir. 1998). The “savings clause” does not violate the Suspension Clause of the Constitution. Reyes-Requena , 243 F.3d at 901 n.19. Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
!

!

 ̈§¦25

 ̈§¦90

 ̈§¦90

 ̈§¦80

Hot Springs

Yellowstone

National Park

Washakie

Sheridan

Goshen

Niobrara

Weston

Laramie

Big Horn

Platte

Uinta

Converse

Crook

Johnson

Teton

Campbell

Lincoln

Sublette

Albany

Natrona

Sweetwater Carbon

Fremont

Park

Casper

Cheyenne

Oil and Gas Well Locations

in Southwest Wyoming

Map 4-4

Cumulative Impact Analysis Area (CIAA)

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

0 10 20 40 60 80 100

Miles

0 15 30 60 90 120 150

Kilometers

Wyoming

! Well Location

Oil and Gas Units

Pinedale Planning Area

Bridger Teton National Forest

Oil and Gas Well Locations CIAA Boundary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 497

 491

 434

 361

 328

 389

 388

 368

 369

 362

 352

 334

 328

 373

 0

 0

 486

 507

 520

 531

 535

 544

 549

 548

 541

 543

 670

 666

 640

 655

 666

 489

 436

 363

 328

 304

 334

 357

 355

 362

 352

 334

 329

 324

 325

 0

 0

 470

 487

 507

 519

 531

 534

 544

 541

 535

 537

 544

 640

 625

 631

 647

 493

 472

 396

 343

 317

 373

 374

 360

 367

 356

 342

 331

 325

 346

 0

 0

 478

 497

 513

 525

 532

 538

 547

 544

 538

 539

 607

 657

 631

 644

 659

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 7, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 14,074

 14,244

 14,310

 14,297

 14,219

 14,159

 14,086

 13,978

 13,849

 13,704

 13,545

 13,387

 13,239

 13,103

 12,615

 12,117

 12,101

 12,115

 12,146

 12,190

 12,233

 12,279

 12,330

 12,380

 12,426

 12,462

 12,564

 12,719

 12,843

 12,985

 13,151

 469

 475

 477

 477

 474

 472

 470

 466

 462

 457

 452

 446

 441

 437

 421

 404

 403

 404

 405

 406

 408

 409

 411

 413

 414

 415

 419

 424

 428

 433

 438

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §565b. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–261, §2, Dec. 21, 2022, 136 Stat. 2393

Section, Pub. L. 89–224, §3, Oct. 1, 1965, 79 Stat. 897, related to timing of payments and claims for shares of deceased enrollees.
§ 32.6 Request for grant. ( a ) All States will be given an opportunity to participate in the program. Thirty percent of each appropriation will be allocated among the States on the basis of total youth population as defined in § 32.2(o) of this part.
( b ) States may apply for grants under the program in accordance with Attachment M of OMB Circular A-102. Forms and instructions may be obtained from either Forest Service or Interior Regional/Area locations throughout the country.
( c ) The Grantee shall submit a consolidated application for all YACC projects included in its program.
( d ) Allocated grant funds not needed by a State may be reallocated to another State at the discretion of the Secretaries. The Secretaries may choose to reallocate such funds to any one or several of the applicants in order to maximize employment. Section 32.9 of this part shall also apply to fund reallocation.
( e ) The Secretaries have designated officials at their respective Regional/Area Offices to receive and approve State applications for YACC grants. These officials must jointly act on all applications and will furnish technical assistance and advice concerning all YACC program matters. The names and addresses of these designated Federal officials will be furnished to each State.
( f ) The initial YACC State Grant Program year shall be from April 1, 1978, to March 31, 1979. Program years beginning in FY 79 will be consistent with the Federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6388

CAMERON J. ROLLINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-01-1664-AM)

Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cameron J. Rollins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Cameron J. Rollins seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Rollins has

not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right. See Rollins v. Angelone, No. CA-01-1664-AM (E.D. Va. Jan.

4, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 3177.12 Reporting requirements for disposal facilities.

All unauthorized discharge or spills from disposal facilities on Federal/Indian leases shall be reported to the authorized officer in accordance with the provisions of NTL-3A.

| Violation | Corrective action | Normal abatement period |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Minor unless resulting damage is major | Submit the required report | As specified by the authorized officer. |

Table 1 to § 3177.12
§ 2568.40 Does BLM have the authority to ask me for the information required in these regulations? ( a ) Yes. The Office of Management and Budget has approved, under 44 U.S.C. 3507, the information collection requirements contained in Subpart 2568 and has assigned them clearance number 1004-0191 for Form AK-2561-10. BLM uses this information to determine if using the public lands is appropriate. You must respond to obtain a benefit.
( b ) BLM estimates that the public reporting burden for this information is as follows: 28 hours per response to fill out form AK-2561-10. These estimates include the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing the collection of information.
( c ) Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C St. N.W., Mail Stop 401 LS, Washington, D.C. 20240.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 59166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22194]



[[Page 59166]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 0, 2 and 101

[ET Docket No. 95-183; RM-8553; PP Docket No. 93-253; FCC 04-78]


37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands--Competitive Bidding

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission is 
extending the comment and reply comment period for the Third Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The Commission finds that it is in the 
public interest to extend the time for the filing of comments and reply 
comments on the NPRM.

DATES: The time for filing comments on all issues raised in the NPRM, 
including Paperwork Reduction Act is extended to December 3, 2004, and 
the time for filing reply comments is extended January 3, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charlie Oliver, 202-418-2487.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of an Order released by 
the Commission, extending the time for filing comments and reply 
comments on the Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC 04-78, 
released on May 5, 2004. Comment due dates contained in the summary of 
the NPRM published in the Federal Register, 69 FR 52632, August 27, 
2004, are inconsistent with comment due dates contained in the NPRM.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-22194 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1557-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (FEMA-1557-DR), dated September 19, 2004, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

Effective September 22, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 19, 2004:

Bedford, Bradford, Clarion, Clinton, Columbia, Fulton, Jefferson, Juniata, Mifflin, Monroe, Northumberland, Pike, Snyder, Union, and Wayne Counties for Individual Assistance. 

Bedford, Bradford, Clarion, Clinton, Columbia, Fulton, Jefferson, Juniata, Mifflin, Monroe, Northumberland, Pike, Snyder, Union, and Wayne Counties for debris removal and emergency protective measures (Categories A & B) under the Public Assistance program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-22068 Filed 9-30-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 501.40

 501.42

 500.87

 499.30

 498.96

 498.52

 500.13

 499.46

 499.31

 498.07

 497.78

 497.63

 498.09

 497.46

 497.36

 496.51

 496.81

 496.74

 496.20

 496.11

 496.02

 496.00

 495.78

 495.18

 494.01

 493.30

 492.15

 492.30

 492.24

 493.05

 56,828

 56,850

 56,246

 54,556

 54,194

 53,732

 55,444

 54,727

 54,567

 53,259

 52,957

 52,802

 53,280

 52,626

 52,522

 51,649

 51,955

 51,884

 51,333

 51,241

 51,149

 51,129

 50,908

 50,305

 49,146

 48,455

 47,350

 47,493

 47,436

 48,212

STORAGE

+99

+22

-604

-1,690

-362

-462

+1,712

-717

-160

-1,308

-302

-155

+478

-654

-104

-873

+306

-71

-551

-92

-92

-20

-221

-603

-1,159

-691

-1,105

+143

-57

+776

CHANGE

894

665

1,653

1,488

1,584

2,193

2,734

2,041

2,409

1,211

636

517

842

279

550

143

740

575

322

547

550

607

501

296

15

245

30

668

567

993

INFLOW

 842

 650

 1,955

 2,339

 1,763

 2,330

 1,868

 2,327

 2,450

 1,869

 784

 591

 599

 607

 600

 582

 586

 608

 599

 539

 594

 616

 607

 597

 596

 590

 585

 594

 595

 600

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 92

 0

 72

 37

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 50

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 2

 4

 3

 1

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

 1

 4

 4

 2

 2

 2

 1

 0

 3

 1

 4

 2

 1

 5

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2017 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/01/2017

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -8,517 26,495 30,462 0 251 75

ACRE-FEET -8,517 52,553 60,421 0 498 149

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 60,421

SPILL 0 60,919

 56,729

OUTLET 498

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 898

 667

 1,596

 1,591

 1,533

 2,161

 2,723

 2,040

 2,077

 1,247

 650

 525

 846

 292

 550

 81

 733

 575

 344

 534

 557

 606

 536

 273

 28

 223

 28

 661

 566

 985

 26,126

 51,821

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
#### § 3581.4-3 Lease form and execution.

A lease on a form approved by the Director shall be furnished to the applicant, who shall be allowed 30 days from notice within which to execute and return the lease to the proper BLM office and to furnish the required bond.
#### G. P. Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Walter Diestelhorst, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 72-209;

Fifth District

June 7, 1974.

Denis McGrady, Jr., of McGrady and Madden, of Gillespie, for appellant.

Sprague, Sprague & Ysursa, of Belleville (Robert J. Sprague, of counsel), for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

CREBS, J., took no part.