alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2569.507 What should I do if the Eligible Individual dies or becomes incapacitated during the application process? ( a ) If an Eligible Individual dies during the application process, another individual may continue the application process as a personal representative of the estate of the deceased Eligible Individual by providing to the BLM the materials described in § 2569.404(b)(2).
( b ) If an Eligible Individual becomes incapacitated during the application process, another individual may continue the application process as a court-appointed guardian or conservator or as an attorney-in-fact for the Eligible Individual by providing to the BLM the materials described in § 2569.404(b)(3) or (4).
( c ) If a deceased or incapacitated Eligible Individual has received a notice from the BLM that requires a response within 60 days, as described in § 2569.410, § 2569.501(e), § 2569.501(h)(3), § 2569.502(b), or § 2569.503(a), and no personal representative, guardian, or conservator has been appointed, or no attorney-in-fact has been designated, the individual who receives the notice, or an employee of the BIA or a Realty Service Provider, may respond to the notice in order to request that the BLM extend the 60-day period to allow for a personal representative, guardian, or conservator to be appointed. The BLM will extend a 60-day period under this paragraph (c) for up to two years.
( d ) If the BLM has completed a Draft Plan of Survey as described in § 2569.501(d) or a survey as described in § 2569.501(g), and the estate of the deceased Eligible Individual does not wish to dispute the Draft Plan of Survey as described in § 2569.501(e) or the results of the survey as described in § 2569.501(h), then the BLM will not require a personal representative to be appointed. The BLM will continue to process the application.
( e ) Other than as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, the BLM will not accept any correspondence on behalf of a deceased or incapacitated Eligible Individual from an individual who has not provided the materials described in § 2569.404(b)(2), (3), or (4).
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the  annual  report of Northern  Explorations,  Ltd. (the
Company)  on Form 10-K for the  period  ended  March 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the  Report)  the
undersigned  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: July 14, 2010                 /s/ KENNETH J. YONIKA
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Kenneth J. Yonika, CPA
                                    Principal Executive Officer,
                                    President, Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52996-52997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20904]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8441]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Face to Face: Flanders, Florence, and Renaissance 
Painting'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Face to Face: Flanders, Florence, and 
Renaissance Painting,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with foreign owners or custodians. 
I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects 
at The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens, San 
Marino, CA, from on or about September 28, 2013, until on or about 
January 13, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of

[[Page 52997]]

State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 16, 2013.
Lee Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-20904 Filed 8-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.47

 130.38

 130.49

 130.57

 130.55

 130.46

 130.35

 130.35

 130.42

 130.48

 130.51

 130.40

 130.42

 130.43

 130.13

 130.18

 130.16

 130.37

 130.63

 130.75

 130.81

 130.81

 130.76

 130.70

 130.53

 130.68

 130.70

 130.59

 130.51

 130.79

 130.67

 630

 621

 632

 641

 639

 629

 618

 618

 625

 631

 634

 623

 625

 626

 594

 599

 597

 620

 648

 662

 668

 668

 663

 656

 636

 654

 656

 643

 634

 666

 652

STORAGE

-6

-9

+11

+9

-2

-10

-11

+0

+7

+6

+3

-11

+2

+1

-32

+5

-2

+23

+28

+14

+6

+0

-5

-7

-20

+18

+2

-13

-9

+32

-14

CHANGE

115

137

147

149

148

148

149

158

166

163

177

185

201

198

190

227

251

249

239

230

223

224

221

234

244

289

304

311

416

492

472

INFLOW

 32

 35

 38

 38

 38

 38

 40

 42

 42

 42

 41

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 115

 115

 86

PUTAH

 85

 106

 102

 105

 110

 114

 115

 115

 119

 118

 134

 151

 159

 156

 166

 184

 212

 197

 185

 182

 179

 183

 183

 197

 213

 239

 262

 277

 305

 359

 391

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .15

 .14

 .22

 .14

 .15

 .14

 .12

 .14

 .14

 .09

 .04

 .12

 .26

 .17

 .11

 .08

 .11

 .10

 .04

 .14

 .18

 .24

 .25

 .33

 .24

 .30

 .27

 .23

 .27

 .43

 .45

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .24

 .29

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .04

 .00

 .01

 .33

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

MARCH 2021 RUN DATE: 04/05/2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +16 7,057 5,603 1,422 24 5.79 1.13

ACRE-FEET +16 13,998 11,114 2,821 48

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,821

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 11,114

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.13

JULY 1, 2020 7.99

 636

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 7.99
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

1st Constitution Bancorp: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statement (No. 333-98177) filed onForm S-8, of our report dated February 6, 2004, relating to the consolidated statements of condition of 1stConstitution Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003,which report appears in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of 1st Constitution Bancorp. 

 

**KPMG LLP**

 

Short Hills, New Jersey 

March 22, 2004
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEvaluation of Pressurization Fatigue Life of 1441 Al-li Fuselage PanelA study was conducted to evaluate the pressurization fatigue life of fuselage panels with skins fabricated from 1441 Al-Li, an attractive new Russian alloy. The study indicated that 1441 Al-Li has several advantages over conventional aluminum fuselage skin alloy with respect to fatigue behavior. Smooth 1441 Al-Li sheet specimens exhibited a fatigue endurance limit similar to that for 1163 Al (Russian version of 2024 Al) sheet. Notched 1441 Al-Li sheet specimens exhibited greater fatigue strength and longer fatigue life than 1163 Al. In addition, Tu-204 fuselage panels fabricated by Tupolev Design Bureau using Al-Li skin and ring frames with riveted 7000-series aluminum stiffeners had longer pressurization fatigue lives than did panels constructed from conventional aluminum alloys. Taking into account the lower density of this alloy, the results suggest that 1441 Al-Li has the potential to improve fuselage performance while decreasing structural weight.Document ID20000000246Acquisition SourceHeadquartersDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBird, R. Keith*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Dicus, Dennis I.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Fridlyander, Joseph*(All-Russian Inst. of Aviation Materials Moscow,  Russia)*Davydov, Valentin*(All-Russia Inst. of Light Alloys Moscow,  Russia)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1999Subject CategoryMetals And Metallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberL-17887NASA/TM-1999-209684NAS 1.15:209684Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC1-238CONTRACT_GRANT: NCCw-68Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000000246.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 3176.1 Authority.

This subpart is established pursuant to the authority granted to the Secretary of the Interior through various Federal and Indian mineral leasing statutes and the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982. This authority has been delegated to the Bureau of Land Management and is implemented by the onshore oil and gas operating regulations contained in 43 CFR part 3160. More specifically, this subpart implements and supplements the provisions of 43 CFR 3162.1, 3162.5-1(a), (c), and (d), 3162.5-2(a), and 3162.5-3.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 369

 381

 392

 419

 377

 419

 376

 320

 330

 447

 397

 412

 378

 362

 345

 331

 368

 326

 292

 326

 559

 568

 513

 511

 602

 542

 508

 497

 251

 202

 249

 208

 230

 249

 221

 244

 214

 244

 221

 246

 224

 241

 212

 228

 234

 200

 218

 225

 240

 424

 432

 438

 441

 443

 449

 455

 281

 271

 282

 274

 269

 279

 264

 263

 252

 279

 264

 285

 269

 275

 264

 261

 263

 249

 250

 255

 370

 448

 450

 458

 468

 464

 465

 467

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 15, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1097

In Re: JUDY KAY MISKELL,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(1:15-cv-00019-CCB; 1:12-cv-00742-CCB)

Submitted: March 18, 2015 Decided: April 10, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Judy Kay Miskell, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Judy Kay Miskell petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking 

an order granting her a jury trial. Mandamus relief is a 

drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 

(1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th 

Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the 

petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First 

Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).

Mandamus relief is available to remedy the improper denial 

of a jury trial. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 

(4th Cir. 2007). However, because Miskell’s district court 

cases are both closed, she is not entitled to a jury trial. 

Thus, the relief sought by Miskell is not available by way of 

mandamus. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and 

Miskell’s motion concerning judicial review. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
### §702. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 733, §12, 68 Stat. 727, which related to execution of patents, deeds, and other instruments by the Secretary of the Interior, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard Braun, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         Dated:  August 14, 2002



                                                    /s/ Richard Braun
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John W. Roblin, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  November 12, 2010

/s/ John W. Roblin
Name:
John W. Roblin
Title:
Chief Executive Officer
§ 30.415 What may I do if I do not agree with the determination of fair market value in the Order to Submit Bids? ( a ) You may object to the determination of fair market value stated in the Order to Submit Bids if: ( 1 ) You are the heir, devisee, or surviving spouse whose interest is to be sold;
( 2 ) You filed a written request to purchase; or
( 3 ) You are any potential bidder or other party who may be affected by the determination of the fair market value.
( b ) To object to the determination of fair market value: ( 1 ) You must file a written objection with OHA no later than 45 days after the mailing date of the Order to Submit Bids.
( 2 ) The objection must: ( i ) State the reasons for the objection; and
( ii ) Include any supporting documentation showing why the fair market value should be modified.
( 3 ) You must provide copies of the written objection and any supporting documentation to all parties who have an interest in the purchase of the property.
( c ) Any party who may be affected by the determination of the fair market value may file a response to the written objection with OHA no later than 45 days after the date the written objection was served on the interested parties. Any document supporting the party's response must be submitted with the response.
( d ) The judge will consider any timely submitted written objection and responses, and will determine whether to modify the finding of fair market value, with or without a valuation hearing. OHA will issue a Modified Order to Submit Bids that addresses the objection and responses.
( e ) If you were directed to submit a bid, you may preserve your right to submit a bid by filing the written objection instead of a bid.
[86 FR 72090, Dec. 20, 2021, as amended at 88 FR 39769, June 20, 2023]
(No. 783

Claim denied.)

#### Dearborn Chemical Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 10, 1927.*

Franchise *tax*— when *court without jurisdiction.*The decision of the court announced in the case of *Moline Plow Co.*v. *State, supra,*governs this claim.

Mills & Howe, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Edward C. Fitch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

For the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in this court in the case of *Moline Plow Company*v. *State of Illinois,*No. 687a, this claim is disallowed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4562 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4562

To amend title 37, United States Code, to increase the basic allowance 
   for housing inside the United States for members of the uniformed 
                               services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 2022

 Mr. Warnock (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Ossoff, Mr. Tester, Mr. 
Merkley, and Mr. Booker) introduced the following bill; which was read 
         twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 37, United States Code, to increase the basic allowance 
   for housing inside the United States for members of the uniformed 
                               services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``BAH Restoration Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING INSIDE THE UNITED 
              STATES FOR MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES.

    Paragraph (3) of section 403(b) of title 37, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(3) The monthly amount of the basic allowance for housing for an 
area of the United States for a member of a uniformed service shall be 
the amount of the monthly cost of adequate housing in that area, as 
determined by the Secretary of Defense, for members of the uniformed 
services serving in the same pay grade and with the same dependency 
status as the member.''.
                                 <all>
```