# United Sta tes Co urt of A ppea ls F O R T HE D I S T R

I C T O F C O L U M B I A

C I RC U I T 

# No. 09-1322 September Term, 2014 F I L E D 

### : A P R

I L 

### 10, 2015 C O A L I TI ON

F O R 

### R E S P ON S I B L E 

### R E G U L A TI ON 

### , I N C 

### ., E T A L 

### ., P E TI TI ON E R S



### v. E N V I R ON ME N TA L 

### P R O TE C TI O

N 

### A G E N C Y 

### , R E S P ON D E

N T 

### S TA TE O F 

### M I C H I G

A N 

### , E T A L 

### ., I N TE R V E N O R S



### _____________________________________ Consolidated with 10-1024, 10-1025, 10-1026, 10-1030, 10- 1035, 10-1036, 10-1037, 10- 1038, 10-1039, 10-1040, 10- 1041, 10-1042, 10-1044, 10- 1045, 10-1046, 10-1234, 10- 1235, 10-1239, 10-1245, 10-1281, 10- 1310, 10-1318, 10-1319, 10- 1320, 10-1321

______ 

# No. 10-1073
C O A L I TI ON

F O R 

### R E S P ON S I B L E 

### R E G U L A TI ON 

### , I N C 

### ., E T A L 

### ., P E TI TI ON E R S



### v. E N V I R ON ME N TA L 

### P R O TE C TI O

N 

### A G E N C Y 

### , R E S P ON D E

N T 

### A ME R I C A N 

### F R O Z E N 

### F O O D 

### I

N S TI TUTE 

### , E T A L 

### ., I N TE R V E N O R S



### _____________________________________ Consolidated with 10-1083, 10-1099, 10-1109, 10-1110, 10- 1114, 10-1118, 10-1119, 10- 1120, 10-1122, 10-1123, 10- 1124, 10-1125, 10-1126, 10- 1127, 10-1128, 10-1129, 10- 1131, 10-1132, 10-1145, 10-1147, 10- 1148, 10-1199, 10-1200, 10- 1201, 10-1202, 10-1203, 10- 1206, 10-1207, 10-1208, 10-1210, 10- 1211, 10-1212, 10-1213, 10- 1216, 10-1218, 10-1219, 10- 1220, 10-1221, 10-1222 USCA Case #09-1322 Document #1546840 Filed: 04/10/2015 Page 1 of 3

# No. 09-1322 September Term, 2014

No. 10-1092
C O A L I TI ON

F O R 

### R E S P ON S I B L E 

### R E G U L A TI ON 

### , I N C 

### ., E T A L 

### ., P E TI TI ON E R S



### v. E N V I R ON ME N TA L 

### P R O TE C TI O

N 

### A G E N C Y 

### , R E S P ON D E

N T 

### L A N G B O A R

D 

### , I N C


### . - MDF, E T A L 

### ., I N TE R V E N O R S



### ______________________________________ Consolidated with 10-1094, 10-1134, 10-1143, 10-1144, 10- 1152, 10-1156, 10-1158, 10- 1159, 10-1160, 10-1161, 10- 1162, 10-1163, 10-1164, 10- 1166, 10-1182

______ 

# No. 10-1167
A ME R I C A N 

### C H E M I S TR

Y 

### C O U N C I L 

### , P E TI TI ON E R



### v. E N V I R ON ME N TA L 

### P R O TE C TI O

N 

### A G E N C Y A N D 

### L I S A 

### P E R

E Z 

### J A C K S ON 

### , A D M I

N I S TR A TO R 

### , U.S. E N V I R ON ME N TA L 

### P R O TE C TI O

N 

### A G E N C Y 

### , R E S P ON D E

N TS 

### C H A M B E R O F 

### C O M

M E R C EO F T H E 

### U

N I TE D 

### S TA TE S O F 

### A M E R I C A 

### , E T A L 

### ., I N TE R V E N O R S



### _________________________________________ Consolidated with 10-1168, 10-1169, 10-1170, 10-1173, 10- 1174, 10-1175, 10-1176, 10- 1177, 10-1178, 10-1179, 10- 1180

______ On Petitions for Review of F inal Actions of the Environme ntal Protection Ag ency

On Remand fr om the United States Supreme Court USCA Case #09-1322 Document #1546840 Filed: 04/10/2015 Page 2 of 3

# No. 09-1322 September Term, 2014

Be fore : R O G E R S 

### and T A TE L 

### , Circuit Judges , and S E N TE L L E 

### , Senior Circuit Judge

. A M E N D E D J U D G M E N T Upon consider ation of the opinion in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA , 134 S. Ct

. 2427 (2014); EPA’s motion to gove rn fur ther proc eeding s and the re sponses there to; the State, I ndustry , and Public I ntere st parties’ joint motion to gover n future pr ocee dings a

nd the re sponses there to; the motion t o g overn of Environmental Respondent- I nterve nors and the r esponses there to; the motion of Energ y -I ntensive Manuf actur ers Gr oup to gove rn future proce eding s and the re sponses there to; and the joint moti on of the Allianc e of A utomobile Manufac turers a nd the Association of Globa l Automakers to g overn f uture proc eeding s and the re sponse there to, it is ORDERED that this court’s judg ment filed June 26, 2012, be amende d in acc ordanc e with the Supreme Court’s de cision. See U ARG v. E PA , 134 S. Ct . at 2449 (a ffirming in part and reve rsing in part). I t is F URTHER ORDERED and ADJUDG ED that: (1) the r eg ulations under re view (including 40 C.F.R. §§ 51.166(b)( 48)(v) and 52.21(b) (49)( v)) be vacated to the extent they require a stationary

source to obtain a PSD permit if gr eenhouse g ases a re the only

pollutant (i) that the source emits or has the potential to emit above the applica ble major sourc e thre sholds, or (ii) for w hich there is a signif icant emissions increa se fr om a modification; (2) the regulations under r eview be vaca

ted to the extent they

require a stationary

source to obtain a title V permit solely beca use the sourc e emits or has the potential to emit gr eenhouse g ases a bove the applicable major sourc e thre sholds; and (3) the r eg ulations under re view (in pa rticular 40 C.F .R. § 52.22 and 40 C.F.R. §§ 70.12, 71.13) be vacated to the extent they require EPA to consider further phasing -in the re quirements identified in (1) and (2) above, at lower g ree nhouse g as emission thresholds. I t is F URTHER ORDERED and ADJUDG ED that the petitions for re view in Nos. 09- 1322, et al., 10-1073, e t al., 10-1092, et a l., and 10-1167, e t al., otherwise be denied in their entirety . I t is F URTHER ORDERED that EPA take steps to re scind and/or r evise the a pplicable provisions of the Code of F eder al Reg ulations as expeditious ly as pra cticable to refle ct the re lief g rante d in the second de cre tal para g raph of this judgment. I t is F URTHER ORDERED that EPA consider w hether any further revisions to its regulations are a

ppropriate in light of UARG v . EPA , 134 S. Ct . 2427, and if so, under take to make suc h revisions. The Clerk is dire cted to issue the manda te forthwith. P er C uriam F OR THE COURT:

Mark J. L ang er, Cler

k BY : /s/ Michae l C. McGrail Deputy Clerk USCA Case #09-1322 Document #1546840 Filed: 04/10/2015 Page 3 of 3