alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOn-Line Database of Vibration-Based Damage Detection ExperimentsThis paper describes a new, on-line bibliographic database of vibration-based damage detection experiments. Publications in the database discuss experiments conducted on actual structures as well as those conducted with simulated data. The database can be searched and sorted in many ways, and it provides photographs of test structures when available. It currently contains 100 publications, which is estimated to be about 5-10% of the number of papers written to date on this subject. Additional entries are forthcoming. This database is available for public use on the Internet at the following address: http://sdbpappa-mac.larc.nasa.gov. Click on the link named "dd_experiments.fp3" and then type "guest" as the password. No user name is required.Document ID20000024873Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPappa, Richard S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Doebling, Scott W.*(Los Alamos National Lab. NM United States)*Kholwad, Tina D.*(New Mexico Univ. Albuquerque, NM United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 2000Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2000-209840L-17930NAS 1.15:209840Meeting InformationMeeting: 18th International Modal Analysis ConferenceLocation: San Antonio, TXCountry: United StatesStart Date: February 7, 2000End Date: February 10, 2000Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 706-12-21-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000024873.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Ella Kyle, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.

and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4552 

To extend the program for authority to acquire innovative commercial items 

using general solicitation procedures. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2022 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend the program for authority to acquire innovative 

commercial items using general solicitation procedures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extension of Authority 

5 to Acquire Innovative Commercial Items Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INNOVATIVE COMMERCIAL ITEMS. 

7 Section 880 of the National Defense Authorization 

8 Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (41 U.S.C. 3301 note) is amend9 ed— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4552 IS

1 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘$10,000,000’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘$25,000,000’’; 

3 (2) by amending subsection (f) to read as fol4 lows: 

5 ‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

6 ‘‘(1) the term ‘commercial product’— 

7 ‘‘(A) has the meaning given the term ‘com8 mercial item’ in section 2.101 of the Federal 

9 Acquisition Regulation; and 

10 ‘‘(B) includes a commercial product or a 

11 commercial service, as those terms are defined 

12 in sections 103 and 103a, respectively, of this 

13 title; and 

14 ‘‘(2) the term ‘innovative’ means— 

15 ‘‘(A) any new technology, process, or meth16 od, including research and development; or 

17 ‘‘(B) any new application of an existing 

18 technology, process, or method.’’; and 

19 (3) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘2022’’ and 

20 inserting ‘‘2027’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 617

 634

 620

 604

 652

 652

 594

 395

 418

 449

 565

 579

 571

 576

 559

 697

 690

 717

 707

 570

 515

 494

 499

 474

 456

 410

 423

 426

 428

 462

 494

 574

 579

 596

 561

 551

 587

 297

 334

 357

 403

 399

 517

 452

 525

 511

 485

 663

 675

 573

 519

 467

 455

 475

 461

 394

 395

 392

 392

 400

 432

 462

 598

 597

 609

 578

 603

 624

 437

 381

 391

 425

 483

 546

 549

 554

 543

 627

 675

 699

 637

 548

 480

 469

 488

 466

 410

 403

 410

 413

 408

 451

 475

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### SMITH *v.*MADDOX-RUCKER BANKING COMPANY.

Where the verdict was not demanded by. the law and evidence, the Supreme Court will not disturb the first grant of a new trial, though it was upon a single ground, nor will it determine whether the trial court was right in granting the motion on a special ground. This is a rule without an ■ exception.

September 23, 1910.

The Court of Appeals certified to the Supreme Court the following questions:

“1. Has the judge of a trial court, upon a motion for new trial containing the usual grounds and a further general ground that the verdict is excessive, the power to set aside the verdict in-a case of libel, slander, or in other similar eases in which the sole measure of the damage is the enlightened conscience of the jury, when in his opinion the verdict is unreasonably too large, although there is nothing in the record to show that the verdict is the result of gross mistake or undue bias?

*“2.*WTiere the jury returns a verdict in a case of the kind mentioned above, and the trial judge sets it aside on the ground that in his opinion it is excessive, and it is the opinion of this court that the verdict is not so large as to raise the inference that it was the result of gross mistake or bias or prejudice, is it proper *152that this court reverse the judgment of the trial court awarding the first grant of a new trial on this ground alone, — -there being undisputed evidence tending to show that the plaintiff is entitled to recover in some amount (see *Holland*v. Williams, 3 *Ga. App.*636 (60 S. E. 331), and cases cited therein, and *Brown*v. *Autrey,*78 *Ga.*756 (3 S. E. 669), and eases cited) ?

“3. Is an action by a depositor against a bank for dishonoring a check drawn by him upon the bank against adequate funds, out of which- the bank should have paid it, within the rule of damages and of discretion or lack of discretion (as tlig case may be found to be) referred to in the foregoing questions — the refusal of the bank not being wilful or malicious, but merely the result of a mistake or simple negligence on its part;. and no special damages being shown?”

*R. B. Blackburn,*for plaintiff.

*Smith, Hammond é Smith,*for defendant.

Beck, *J.*

*We*are of the opinion that the rule announced in the case of *Cox*v. *Grady,*132 *Ga.*368 (64 S. E. 262), is comprehensive enough to embrace eases of the character of the instant case 'to which the certified questions relate. The ruling there announced answers in the affirmative the first and third questions, and requires an answer in the negative to the second question; and the scope of the discussion in the opinion and in the cases cited in the *Cox*ease render further argument unnecessary. We are satisfied with the reasoning.in that case and in the case of *Holland v. Williams,*3 *Ga. App.*636 (60 S. E. 331).

*All the Justices concur, except Immpkin, J., disqualified.*
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaydon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended April 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Brian P. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. May 10, 2005
    
    /s/Brian P. CampbellBrian P. CampbellChief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
Table 23

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

 Madera Canal and Millerton Lake

2012

Monthly Deliveries in AF

Water Users Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

MADERA CANAL

Chowchilla WD 0 0 0 0 10120 17684 11178 00000 38982

Madera ID 1551 0 0 0 5996 21795 24665 20103 4973 0 0 0 79083

Soquel (Madera non-proj) 7 7 8 7 7 8 9 10 8 7 5 0 83

Total 1558 7 8 7 16123 39487 35852 20113 4981 7 5 0 118148

MILLERTON LAKE

County of Madera 111234443220 27

Fresno County # 18 7 6 7 8 14 17 20 19 0 11 0 0 109

Gravelly Ford WD 000000000000 0

.

Total 8 7 8 10 17 21 24 23 3 13 2 0 136

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4627 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4627

 To include smoke in the definition of disaster in the Small Business 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2022

 Ms. Cortez Masto introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
  and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To include smoke in the definition of disaster in the Small Business 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Wildfire Smoke 
Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF DISASTER.

    Section 3(k)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(k)(2)) is 
amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) smoke.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §712d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 97–391, §6, Dec. 29, 1982, 96 Stat. 1961, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to make rules necessary to carry out the provisions of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 392

 411

 393

 416

 394

 393

 408

 403

 394

 446

 427

 431

 424

 459

 453

 449

 453

 445

 456

 420

 443

 454

 443

 430

 428

 447

 469

 459

 497

 483

 532

 346

 348

 361

 359

 354

 356

 354

 344

 336

 344

 348

 348

 365

 378

 389

 388

 392

 399

 392

 391

 388

 402

 375

 389

 402

 418

 410

 414

 446

 449

 449

 368

 365

 376

 375

 370

 368

 368

 365

 362

 360

 366

 370

 380

 393

 407

 410

 411

 413

 421

 407

 407

 424

 419

 410

 414

 435

 444

 443

 463

 466

 478

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Exhibit 31.2


I, Jaren Chan, CEO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K-SB of Myoffiz, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to
us by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.






   January 14, 2003               /s/    Jaren Chan
                                  --------------------
                                  Jaren Chan
                                  Chief Executive Officer
### Subpart A—Private Activity Bonds

Sec.
141.
Private activity bond; qualified bond.
142.
Exempt facility bond.
143.
Mortgage revenue bonds; qualified mortgage bond and qualified veterans' mortgage bond. 1

144.
Qualified small issue bond; qualified student loan bond; qualified redevelopment bond.
145.
Qualified 501(c)(3) bond.
146.
Volume cap.
147.
Other requirements applicable to certain private activity bonds.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title IV, §401(a)(46), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1186, substituted "Mortgage revenue bonds; qualified mortgage bond and qualified veterans' mortgage bond" for "Mortgage revenue bonds: qualified mortgage and qualified veterans' mortgage bond" in item 143.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–514, title XIII, §1301(b), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2603, in amending part IV generally, added subpart heading and analysis and struck out item 143 "Determination of marital status".

**1977**—Pub. L. 95–30, title I, §101(e)(2), May 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 134, struck out items 141 "Standard deduction", 142 "Individuals not eligible for standard deduction", 144 "Election of standard deduction", and 145 "Cross reference".

1  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
SERVED: FEBRUARY 28, 2012 

;['R^RTMLNTCF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION --.r^^cj \^p^\]:\]\Q[\'>^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS '''"'"" " "' ' 

WASHINGTON, DC ;[1I7 ITR -^q p j- IH 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GREENWOOD CHEVROLET 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMSNO. FAA-201I -0482 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following 

procedural schedule: 

... On or before June I, 20/2, the parties shall conclude all discovery incluJing, 

hut not limited lo, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

(hey shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely 

manner... 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on June 11 and 12, 2012, inclusive, in the U.S. Tax Court: Room 2-1350, Federal 

Building and U.S. Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. 

Hearings will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties 

should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00 p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service. 

SO ORDERED. 

Richard C. Goodwin ^ ^ 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMSNo. FAA-2011-0482 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention; Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Houston N. Tuel, Jr., Respondent's Counsel 

Law Offices of Houston Tuel 

1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 206 

West Sacramento, CA 95691 

TEL: 916-376-0100 

FAX: 916-376-0299 

Lisa J. Toscano, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, AWP-7 

Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL; 310-725-7110 

FAX; 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant/Paralegal 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Scrx'icc was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited conrier, use Uic following address: 

Federal Aviation Adnunistralion. 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suile 2W1000. 

Wasliingion, DC 20591, Allcnlion: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### § 2450.2 Preliminary determination.

Upon the filing of a petition-application, the authorized officer shall make a preliminary determination as to whether it is regular upon its face and, where there is no apparent defect, shall proceed to investigate and classify the land for which it has been filed. No further consideration will be given to the merits of an application or the qualifications of an applicant unless or until the land has been classified for the purpose for which the petition-application has been filed.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPreliminary Assessment of Operational Hazards and Safety Requirements for Airborne Trajectory Management (ABTM) Roadmap ApplicationsA set of five developmental steps building from the NASA TASAR (Traffic Aware Strategic Aircrew Requests) concept are described, each providing incrementally more efficiency and capacity benefits to airspace system users and service providers, culminating in a Full Airborne Trajectory Management capability. For each of these steps, the incremental Operational Hazards and Safety Requirements are identified for later use in future formal safety assessments intended to lead to certification and operational approval of the equipment and the associated procedures. Two established safety assessment methodologies that are compliant with the FAA's Safety Management System were used leading to Failure Effects Classifications (FEC) for each of the steps. The most likely FEC for the first three steps, Basic TASAR, Digital TASAR, and 4D TASAR, is "No effect". For step four, Strategic Airborne Trajectory Management, the likely FEC is "Minor". For Full Airborne Trajectory Management (Step 5), the most likely FEC is "Major".Document ID20160006301Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCotton, William B.*(National Inst. of Aerospace Hampton, VA, United States)*Hilb, Robert*(National Inst. of Aerospace Hampton, VA, United States)*Koczo, Stefan, Jr.*(Rockwell Collins, Inc. Cedar Rapids, IA, United States)*Wing, David J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 17, 2016Publication DateMarch 1, 2016Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberL-20681NF1676L-23843NASA/TM-2016-219176Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 330693.04.30.07.05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160006301.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### **CHAPTER 23A—RAILROAD UNEMPLOYMENT REPAYMENT TAX**

Sec.
3321.
Imposition of tax.
3322.
Definitions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11704(a)(18), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–519, substituted "23A—" for "23A." in chapter heading.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–647, title VII, §7106(a), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3772, reenacted chapter heading and item 3321 without change, substituted "Definitions" for "Taxable period" in item 3322, and omitted item 3323 "Other definitions".
#### § 3108.50 Waiver or suspension of lease rights.

If, during any proceeding with respect to a violation of any provision of the regulations in 43 CFR parts 3000 and 3100 or the Act, a party thereto files a waiver of his/her rights under the lease to drill or to assign his/her lease interests, or if such rights are suspended by order of the Secretary pending a decision, payments of rentals and the running of time against the term of the lease involved will be suspended as of the first day of the month following the filing of the waiver or the Secretary's suspension until the first day of the month following the final decision in the proceeding or the revocation of the waiver or suspension.