alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,332.01

 2,331.97

 2,331.92

 2,331.90

 2,331.86

 2,331.87

 2,331.86

 2,331.88

 2,331.88

 2,331.89

 2,332.34

 2,332.50

 2,332.75

 2,333.98

 2,334.94

 2,336.26

 2,336.84

 2,337.27

 2,337.67

 2,338.30

 2,338.73

 2,338.81

 2,338.95

 2,339.21

 2,339.52

 2,339.58

 2,339.56

 2,339.41

 2,339.24

 2,339.34

 2,339.26

 1,873.3

 1,872.7

 1,872.0

 1,871.8

 1,871.2

 1,871.3

 1,871.2

 1,871.5

 1,871.5

 1,871.6

 1,877.9

 1,880.1

 1,883.6

 1,900.7

 1,914.2

 1,932.9

 1,941.1

 1,947.2

 1,952.9

 1,961.9

 1,968.1

 1,969.3

 1,971.3

 1,975.0

 1,979.5

 1,980.3

 1,980.1

 1,977.9

 1,975.4

 1,976.9

 1,975.7

STORAGE

-0.4

-0.6

-0.7

-0.3

-0.6

+0.1

-0.1

+0.3

+0.0

+0.1

+6.2

+2.2

+3.5

+17.2

+13.5

+18.7

+8.2

+6.1

+5.7

+9.0

+6.2

+1.1

+2.0

+3.7

+4.5

+0.9

-0.3

-2.2

-2.5

+1.4

-1.2

CHANGE

430

486

706

511

310

438

365

495

398

714

3,458

1,854

2,197

9,170

7,175

9,765

4,361

3,490

4,845

6,474

3,994

2,999

2,868

4,486

4,430

3,161

2,641

2,187

1,781

2,325

2,102

INFLOW

 636

 761

 1,042

 638

 589

 360

 427

 344

 386

 644

 297

 729

 433

 515

 370

 348

 203

 395

 1,963

 1,931

 877

 2,408

 1,852

 2,598

 2,177

 2,712

 2,778

 3,256

 3,004

 1,582

 2,675

POWER SPILL OUTLET

 4

 4

 12

 12

 0

 8

 8

 12

 12

 0

 12

 4

 12

 0

 8

 13

 8

 8

 4

 0

 8

 13

 4

 0

 0

 13

 8

 21

 13

 17

 8

C.F.S.

 .01

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .02

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .02

INCHES

 .22

 .02

 .08

 1.10

 .15

 .17

 .18

 .98

 .49

 .09

 .48

 .22

 .50

 .03

 .20

 .04

 .35

 .42

 .01

 .48

 .26

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2000 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 8, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +101.7 90,616 38,930 0 0 246 .60 6.47

ACRE-FEET +101,700 179,737 77,218 0 0 488

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 77,218

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 77,218

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.47

JULY 1, 1999 13.27

 1,873.7
Exhibit 31.1 Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries Certification Of Chief Executive Officer PURSUANT TO RULE 13a  14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Rodney M. Tiede, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Broadcast International, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c.      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date: August 13, 2007  /s/ Rodney M. Tiede Rodney M. Tiede Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4838]

# ACTION:

Notice correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of State published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 20, 2004, concerning Imposition of Nonproliferation Measures on an Entity in China, Including A Ban on U.S. Government Procurement. This document contained an incorrect name.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

On general issues: Vann H. Van Diepen, Office of Chemical, Biological and Missile Nonproliferation, Bureau of Nonproliferation, Department of State (202-647-1142). On U.S. Government procurement ban issues: Gladys Gines, Office of the Procurement Executive, Department of State (703-516-1691).

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 20, 2004, in FR Doc 04-21079 on page 56260-56261, in the third column, the correct name should read:                    

Xinshidai (also known as: China Xinshidai Company, XSD, China New Era Group or New Era Group).

Dated: September 21, 2004.

Holly West-Owen,

Federal Register Liaison, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 04-21611 Filed 9-24-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 314

 333

 328

 322

 323

 326

 342

 354

 332

 316

 299

 330

 301

 291

 297

 302

 304

 300

 304

 302

 310

 307

 317

 320

 326

 316

 312

 318

 325

 340

 288

 295

 306

 306

 304

 305

 306

 300

 296

 295

 287

 281

 277

 268

 268

 278

 280

 278

 282

 281

 288

 289

 289

 289

 291

 292

 294

 298

 304

 314

 299

 306

 314

 313

 312

 312

 316

 314

 307

 301

 292

 293

 284

 277

 279

 285

 287

 288

 289

 289

 295

 296

 299

 299

 300

 299

 301

 306

 314

 324

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
§ 30.253 What happens if a request for reconsideration of a distribution order is timely made? ( a ) If an heir, devisee, BIA or Tribe files a timely request for reconsideration, OHA will: ( 1 ) Send to BIA a notice of receipt of a petition for reconsideration as soon as practicable, ordering that the newly added property not be distributed or incorrectly included property not be removed, as applicable, during the pendency of the petition for reconsideration; and
( 2 ) Forward a copy of the petition and any documents filed with the petition to the interested parties and affected agencies.
( b ) The agencies must not distribute any portion of the estate while the petition is pending, unless otherwise directed by the judge.
( c ) If proper grounds for reconsideration are not shown, the judge will issue an order denying the petition for reconsideration and including the reasons for the denial.
( d ) If proper grounds for reconsideration are shown, the judge must: ( 1 ) Allow all persons served a reasonable, specified time in which to submit answers or legal briefs in response to the petition; and
( 2 ) Consider, with or without a hearing, the issues raised in the petition, including requests to renounce, requests to purchase newly added properties at probate, and requests to include newly added property in an existing or new consolidation agreement.
( e ) The judge will not reconsider findings made in the decision; the judge will only reconsider findings made in the distribution order regarding the distribution of the additional property or modification to distribution resulting from the inventory correction, as applicable.
( f ) If an interested party raises an inventory dispute in the petition for reconsideration, the judge may order that the distribution order is vacated and remand the BIA's petition to the BIA under § 30.128 to resolve the inventory dispute.
( g ) The judge will issue a final order on reconsideration which may affirm, modify, or vacate the distribution order.
( h ) On entry of a final order on reconsideration, the judge must distribute the order to the petitioner, the agencies, and the interested parties. The order must include notice stating that interested parties who are adversely affected, or BIA, have the right to appeal the final order to the Board, within 30 days of the date on which the order was mailed, and giving the Board's address.
( i ) Neither BIA nor any interested party may file successive petitions for reconsideration.
( j ) The order on a petition for reconsideration will become final on the expiration of the 30 days allowed for the filing of a notice of appeal, as provided in this part and § 4.320 of this chapter.
[86 FR 72089, Dec. 20, 2021]
#### § 30.274 What happens to income from land interests during pendency of the probate?

During the pendency of the probate, there may be income received or accrued from the land interests purchased by the tribe, including the payment from the tribe. This income will be credited to the estate and paid to the heirs. For purposes of this section, pendency of the probate ends on the date of transfer of title to the United States in trust for the tribe under § 30.273.
#### § 3160.0-3 Authority.

The Mineral Leasing Act, as amended and supplemented (30 U.S.C. 181 *et seq.*), the Act of May 21, 1930 (30 U.S.C. 301-306), the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands, as amended (30 U.S.C. 351-359), the Act of March 3, 1909, as amended (25 U.S.C 396), the Act of May 11, 1938, as amended (25 U.S.C. 396a-396q), the Act of February 28, 1891, as amended (25 U.S.C. 397), the Act of May 29, 1924 (25 U.S.C. 398), the Act of March 3, 1927 (25 U.S.C. 398a-398e), the Act of June 30, 1919, as amended (25 U.S.C. 399), R.S. § 441 (43 U.S.C. 1457), the Attorney General's Opinion of April 2, 1941 (40 Op. Atty. Gen. 41), the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (40 U.S.C 471 *et seq.*), the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (40 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*), the Act of December 12, 1980 (94 Stat. 2964), the Combined Hydrocarbon Leasing Act of 1981 (95 Stat. 1070), the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 (30 U.S.C. 1701), the Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982 (25 U.S.C. 2102), and Order Number 3087, dated December 3, 1982, as amended on February 7, 1983 (48 FR 8983) under which the Secretary consolidated and transferred the onshore minerals management functions of the Department, except mineral revenue functions and the responsibility for leasing of restricted Indian lands, to the Bureau of Land Management.

[82 FR 61949, Dec. 29, 2017]
### §1300c–3. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–468, §4, Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 782, which related to per capita distributions of judgment funds to tribal members, other authorized uses of judgment funds, and distribution of shares to minors and persons under legal disability, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §640c–3. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–189, §7, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title V, §5402(b), Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 415; amended Pub. L. 110–315, title IX, §946(f), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3469, which related to method of payment for funds disbursed under former sections 640a to 640c–3 of this title and treatment of interest accrued on such funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 20 , 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00545

- CR

LUIS MIGUEL GONZALES , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1374444

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to burglary of a habitation . In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for eight years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of ap peal. We dismiss the appeal.2

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial c ourt’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports
the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices McCally and Busby

. Do Not Publish

— T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Randy William Sharp , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00242

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 115th District Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 19448 ).
Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and

Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief

Justice Stevens

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for

further proceedings.

We further order that the appell ee, t he State of Texas

, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 2 6 , 2024
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3


Report of Independent Accountants


JPMorgan Chase Bank, Servicer
and
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., Transferor,
and
The Bank of New York, Trustee

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Servicing of Securitized Credit Card Receivables
that JPMorgan Chase Bank maintained effective internal control over servicing of
securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2001, based upon the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over such functions. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over servicing of the securitized
credit card receivables, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that JPMorgan Chase Bank maintained
effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit card receivables
as of December 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based upon
the criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
----------------------------------------
March 25, 2002
§ 3200.4 What requirements must I comply with when taking any actions or conducting any operations under this part? When you are taking any actions or conducting any operations under this part, you must comply with: ( a ) The Act and the regulations of this part;
( b ) Geothermal resource operational orders;
( c ) Notices to lessees;
( d ) Lease terms and stipulations;
( e ) Approved plans and permits;
( f ) Conditions of approval;
( g ) Verbal orders from BLM that will be confirmed in writing;
( h ) Other instructions from BLM; and
( i ) Any other applicable laws and regulations.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, James W. Dennis, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of HealtheTech, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of HealtheTech, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designated under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 29, 2004