alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 1193

Claimant awarded $3,000.00.)

#### Mont S. Coleman, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 12, 1927.*

Fees & *salaries*— when *award will he made.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court in *Redpath*v. *State, supra.*

Noah Gullett, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Merrill F. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion-of the court:

The claimant was appointed in due course as a member of the State mining board, and entered upon the duties of his position in 1917, and has been continuously employed in said position since the date aforesaid. .

It appears that, the legislature, in making the appropriation for the salary in question, did not take into consideration the law enacted by the 52nd General Assembly, effective July 1,1921, which increased the salary of the members of the State mining board from $500.00 to $1,000.00 per annum, being an increase of from $5.00 to $10.00 per day for one hundred (100) days services per annum; and that the legislature has not appropriated sufficient money to pay the increase in salary which was so provided for by the 52nd General Assembly, as aforesaid.

*395That claimant has been paid by the State of Illinois a salary of $500.00 per annum, being $5.00 per day for one hundred (100) days services per annum, and it appears that there is now due and will be owing to him as unpaid salary from the 1st day of July, 1921, to the 1st day of July, 1927, the sum of $3,000.00, this being the difference between the amount paid him and the amount allowed by the statute, up to July 1,1927.

The Attorney General, on behalf of the State, has filed his statement in this cause, and makes no defense thereto, but submits the same upon the recommendation of the director of mines and minerals.

The court therefore awards claimant the sum of $3,000.00.
### §3682. Assistant probation officers

To the maximum extent practicable, the chief judge or chief probation or pretrial services officer of each judicial district, in coordination with the Office of Tribal Justice and the Office of Justice Services, shall—

(1) appoint individuals residing in Indian country to serve as probation or pretrial services officers or assistants for purposes of monitoring and providing services to Federal prisoners residing in Indian country; and

(2) provide substance abuse, mental health, and other related treatment services to offenders residing on Indian land.

(Pub. L. 106–559, title II, §203, as added Pub. L. 111–211, title II, §245, July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2295.)
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-11-00223- CV
Appellan ts, Bret t Bray, in his Of fi cial Capacity as Dire ctor of the Motor V ehicle Division of the Texas De partm ent of Transp ortat ion; and Gulf S tate s Toyota, Inc.//

Cross-A ppellan t, Tejas Toyota, Inc.

v. Appellee, Tejas Toyota, Inc.//Cross-A ppellees, BrettBray, in h is Of fi cial Capacity as Direc tor of the Mot or Ve hicle Division of the Texas Departm ent of Transp ortat ion; and Gulf States Toyota, Inc.

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 345 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-0 9-0 0208 6, H ONO RAB LE GISELA D. TRI ANA-DO Y AL, JUDGE P RESIDING

C O N C U R R

I N G O P I N I O N
I concur in the j udg ment and reasoning of t he majority opinion, with the ex ception of the discussion of the statutory duty of g ood faith and fair dealing found in footnote eleve n. Be cause we need not addre ss the applicability of the statutory duty of g ood faith and fair dealing to dispose of the appea l, I decline to join footnote eleven of the majority

opinion. See Tex. R. App. P

. 47. 1 (cour ts of appea ls must hand down written opinion that is brief as prac ticable but that addre sses ever y issue raised and nec essar

y to final dispositi on of appe al).

__________________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Henson Filed: F ebrua

ry 2, 2012
### §853. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–281, §1(b)(3), May 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 246

Section, act Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 909, §15, 70 Stat. 965, related to preparation and publication of membership roll.
§ 3179.2 Scope. ( a ) Except as provided in provided paragraph (b), this subpart applies to: ( 1 ) All onshore Federal and Indian (other than The Osage Nation) oil and gas leases, units, and communitized areas;
( 2 ) Indian Mineral Development Act (IMDA) agreements, unless specifically excluded in the agreement or unless the relevant provisions of this subpart are inconsistent with the agreement;
( 3 ) Leases and other business agreements and contracts for the development of Tribal energy resources under a Tribal Energy Resource Agreement (TERA) entered into with the Secretary, unless specifically excluded in the lease, other business agreement, or TERA;
( 4 ) Wells, equipment, and operations on State or private tracts that are committed to a federally approved unit or communitization agreement defined by or established under 43 CFR subpart 3105 or 43 CFR part 3180.
( b ) Sections 3179.50, 3179.90, and 3179.100 through 3179.102 apply only to operations and production equipment located on a Federal or Indian surface estate. They do not apply to operations and production equipment on State or private tracts, even where those tracts are committed to a federally approved unit or communitization agreement.
( c ) For purposes of this subpart, the term “lease” also includes IMDA agreements.
### §5384. Compacts

#### (a) Compact required

The Secretary shall negotiate and enter into a written compact with each Indian tribe participating in self-governance in a manner consistent with the Federal Government's trust responsibility, treaty obligations, and the government-to-government relationship between Indian tribes and the United States.

#### (b) Contents

Each compact required under subsection (a) of this section shall set forth the general terms of the government-to-government relationship between the Indian tribe and the Secretary, including such terms as the parties intend shall control year after year. Such compacts may only be amended by mutual agreement of the parties.

#### (c) Existing compacts

An Indian tribe participating in the Tribal Self-Governance Demonstration Project under title III 1 on August 18, 2000, shall have the option at any time after August 18, 2000, to—

(1) retain the Tribal Self-Governance Demonstration Project compact of that Indian tribe (in whole or in part) to the extent that the provisions of that funding agreement are not directly contrary to any express provision of this subchapter; or

(2) instead of retaining a compact or portion thereof under paragraph (1), negotiate a new compact in a manner consistent with the requirements of this subchapter.

#### (d) Term and effective date

The effective date of a compact shall be the date of the approval and execution by the Indian tribe or another date agreed upon by the parties, and shall remain in effect for so long as permitted by Federal law or until terminated by mutual written agreement, retrocession, or reassumption.

(Pub. L. 93–638, title V, §504, as added Pub. L. 106–260, §4, Aug. 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 715.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Title III, referred to in subsec. (c), means title III of Pub. L. 93–638, as added by Pub. L. 100–472, title II, §209, Oct. 5, 1988, 102 Stat. 2296, and amended, which was set out as a note under former section 450f of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 106–260, §10, Aug. 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 734.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 458aaa–3 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

1 See References in Text note below.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 26, 2012

y0319 

# Order

March 26, 2012

144187

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144187 COA: 305342 Washtenaw CC: 10-000475-FH RAHIM RENARD SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 3, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 459

 467

 471

 476

 482

 477

 478

 477

 484

 499

 507

 528

 643

 655

 639

 600

 589

 598

 602

 611

 615

 617

 589

 553

 555

 532

 534

 536

 580

 563

 540

 451

 457

 457

 455

 452

 447

 446

 451

 464

 474

 479

 497

 512

 508

 504

 498

 504

 510

 515

 526

 522

 512

 513

 503

 490

 468

 460

 456

 455

 450

 448

 456

 463

 464

 463

 463

 458

 461

 464

 474

 484

 493

 508

 542

 553

 539

 522

 532

 529

 533

 547

 549

 537

 528

 516

 508

 490

 481

 479

 478

 473

 470

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 739

 776

 784

 801

 793

 797

 783

 796

 800

 819

 792

 767

 735

 750

 721

 709

 659

 664

 701

 725

 729

 719

 764

 738

 703

 745

 733

 706

 704

 702

 702

 713

 717

 747

 776

 781

 711

 758

 765

 780

 793

 713

 699

 713

 727

 650

 648

 630

 638

 651

 685

 698

 686

 735

 686

 646

 623

 623

 659

 659

 642

 682

 721

 759

 763

 792

 788

 771

 777

 783

 790

 809

 745

 715

 720

 738

 665

 658

 641

 651

 675

 710

 716

 705

 755

 716

 681

 716

 691

 672

 686

 688

 691

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
§ 3473.3-2 Royalties. ( a ) ( 1 ) A lease shall require payment of a royalty of not less than 121 ⁄ 2 percent of the value of the coal removed from a surface mine.
( 2 ) A lease shall require payment of a royalty of 8 percent of the value of coal removed from an underground mine.
( 3 ) The value of coal removed from a mine is defined for royalty purposes in § 3483.4 of this title.
( b ) The royalty rates specified in paragraph (a) of this section shall be applied to new leases at the time of issuance and to previously issued leases at the time of the next scheduled readjustment of the lease.
( c ) The authorized officer shall have the discretion, upon the request of the lessee, to authorize the payment of an advance royalty in lieu of continued operation for any particular year in accordance with § 3485.2 of this title.
( d ) An overriding royalty interest, production payment or similar interest that exceeds 50 percent of royalty first payable to the United States under the Federal lease, or when added to any other overriding royalty interest exceeds that precentage, except those created in order to finance a mine, shall not be created by a Federal lease transfer or surface owner consent. However, when an interest in a Federal lease or operating agreement is transferred, the transferor may retain an overriding royalty in excess of the above limitation if he/she shows that he/she has made substantial investments for improvements directly related to exploration, development and mining on the lands covered by the transfer that would justify a higher payment.
( e ) The Secretary, whenever he/she determines it necessary to promote development or finds that the lease cannot be successfully operated under its terms, may waive, suspend or reduce the rental, or reduce the royalty but not advance royalty, on an entire leasehold, or on any deposit, tract or portion thereof, except that in no case shall the royalty be reduced to zero percent. An application for any of these benefits shall be filed with the authorized officer in accordance with part 3480 of this title.
[44 FR 42643, July 19, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 33151, July 30, 1982; 50 FR 8627, Mar. 4, 1985; 55 FR 2664, Jan. 26, 1990]
#### George Stern, Respondent, v. Pesti Magyar Kereskedelmi Bank, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
T7N R6E T7N R5E

T6N R6E T6N R7E T6N R5E

T8N R7E

T9N R8E

T8N R5E

T8N R8E

T7N R8E

T8N R6E

T6N R8E

T10N R6E T10N R8E

T10N R7E

T10N R5E

T7N R7E

T9N R7E

T9N R6E

T8N R4E

T9N R4E T9N R5E

T7N R7E

10N R4E

SSAACC RRAAMMEE NNTTOO CC OO

PPLLAACCEE RR CCOO

AME RICAN RIVER

COSUMNES RIVER

M ORRISON CREEK

FOLSOM LAKE

LAKE NATOMA

STONE LAKE

MATHER LAKE

NHAVEN

BLODGETT RESERVOIR

HINKLE RESERVOIR

5

80

16

99

104

80

160

50

0

0

0

0

6 5 4 3

5 4

9

9

3

7

3

8

5

2

2

8

4

9

8

7

6

9

6

7

4

1

7

3

8

1 1

1

0

8

5

0

11

11

5

1

22

20

15

19

21

13

29

22

28

20

15

34

24

18

20

33

25

27

17

25

29

21

14

21

14

27

27

34

30

34

10

23

26

24

17

19

25

24

15

33

32

31

21

25

16

20

28

29

22

32 35

17

32

23

28

21

16

33

28

29

18

35

21

16

19

30

22

34

20

15

13

10

21

22

28

30

23

20

22

28

27

17

19

26

26

26

24

33

10

34

30

19

16

31

18

26

25

23

27

18

3

14

30

19

16

27

18

12

7

31

36

24

10

17 18

28

20

36

16

29

17

29

36

6

15

15

25

22

24

21

27

14

13

13

27

12

15

23

13

18 17 16

36

14

19

13

24

12

25

25

12

36

33

34 35 36

13

31

18

20

17

32

26

24 19

29

20

20

4

16

0

15

16 14

22 23

35

13 18

17

15

17 17

23

32

16

21

24

29

20

34

22

24

33

27

13

12

18

30

30

19

32

36

19

13

35

25 30

19

33

24

31

28

13

30

18

31

15

7

30

16 15 14

18

13 18 17

2

36

13

25

14

23

26

12

35

6

19

7

11

8

28

33

22

14

14

34

9

32

12

23

13

24

12

26

31

10

35

FOLSOM

SACRAMENTO

FOLSOM

SOUTH CANAL

Sacramento County Water Agency

Contractor's Service Area

District Boundary

Exhibit A

Contract No. 6-07-20-W1372-LTR1

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

353-202-6 0 2.5 5

Date: October 27, 2004 Miles

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\sacramento_co_wa\sacramento_co_wa.mxd
Document

EXHIBIT 10.11


AMENDMENT TO THE 
AMENDED AND RESTATED 
ACXIOM CORPORATION
NON-QUALIFIED MATCHING CONTRIBUTION PLAN


WHEREAS, Acxiom Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Acxiom Corporation Non-Qualified Matching Contribution Plan (the “Plan”), amended and restated effective January 1, 2009;


    WHEREAS, the Company wishes to revise the Plan by shortening the vesting schedule for discretionary contributions and matching contributions to the Plan, effective September 30, 2016; and


WHEREAS, Section 6.3 of the Plan authorizes the Board or an properly authorized committee of the Board to amend the plan from time-to-time;


    NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY


RESOLVED, that Section 5.1 of the Plan, “Vesting of Account,” is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


“A Participant is 100% vested in his salary reduction contributions to the Plan prior to January 1, 2006 and deemed earnings thereon.  
Prior to September 30, 2016, for all non-salary reduction contributions to the Plan, a Participant shall become vested in his Account in accordance with the following schedule:
						
	Years of Service
With the Employer
	
Vested Percentage
	1	0%
	2	20%
	3	40%
	4	60%
	5	80%
	6	100%


1






Effective September 30, 2016, for all non-salary reduction contributions to the Plan, a Participant shall become vested in his Account in accordance with the following schedule:
						
	Years of Service
With the Employer
	
Vested Percentage
	Less than 1	0%
	1	33%
	2	66%
	3	100%




Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant’s Account shall become one hundred percent (100%) vested and non-forfeitable in accordance with the following:
(a)    Upon the termination of employment of the Participant on or after the first day of the month coincident with or next following the date on which the Participant attains age 65;
(b)    Upon a determination of Disability in accordance with Section 1.2(f) hereof while the Participant is employed by the Employer; or
(c)    Upon the Participant’s death while the Participant is employed by the Employer.”
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party hereto has executed this amendment as of the date first above written.
                        ACXIOM CORPORATION


            
                        By:       /s/ Jerry C. Jones
                            
2
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.645 Conservation and investment of benefit payments. ( a ) *General.* If payments are not needed for the beneficiary's current maintenance or reasonably foreseeable needs, they shall be conserved or invested on behalf of the beneficiary. Conserved funds should be invested in accordance with the rules followed by trustees. Any investment must show clearly that the payee holds the property in trust for the beneficiary. Example: A State institution for children with intellectual disability, which is receiving Medicaid funds, is representative payee for several beneficiaries. The checks the payee receives are deposited into one account which shows that the benefits are held in trust for the beneficiaries. The institution has supporting records which show the share each individual has in the account. Funds from this account are disbursed fairly quickly after receipt for the personal needs of the beneficiaries. However, not all those funds were disbursed for this purpose. As a result, several of the beneficiaries have significant accumulated resources in this account. For those beneficiaries whose benefits have accumulated over $150, the funds should be deposited in an interest-bearing account or invested relatively free of risk on behalf of the beneficiaries.
( b ) *Preferred investments.* Preferred investments for excess funds are U.S. Savings Bonds and deposits in an interest or dividend paying account in a bank, trust company, credit union, or savings and loan association which is insured under either Federal or State law. The account must be in a form which shows clearly that the representative payee has only a fiduciary and not a personal interest in the funds. If the payee is the legally appointed guardian or fiduciary of the beneficiary, the account may be established to indicate this relationship. If the payee is not the legally appointed guardian or fiduciary, the accounts may be established as follows: ( 1 ) For U.S. Savings Bonds— ______ (Name of beneficiary) ___ (Social Security Number), for whom ______ (Name of payee) is representative payee for Supplemental Security Income benefits;
( 2 ) For interest or dividend paying accounts— ______ (Name of beneficiary) by ______ (Name of payee), representative payee.
( c ) *Interest and dividend payments.* The interest and dividends which result from an investment are the property of the beneficiary and may not be considered to be the property of the payee.
[47 FR 30475, July 14, 1982, as amended at 78 FR 46501, Aug. 1, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
MORGAN PRODUCTS FORM 10-Q AS OF JULY 4, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                             318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                       553
<INVENTORY>                                     35,251
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,871
<PP&E>                                          24,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,304
<BONDS>                                         32,496
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,408
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,297)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,911
<SALES>                                        178,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               178,392
<CGS>                                          152,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  177,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (164)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    34
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        60
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (327)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (327)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        


</TABLE>
§ 3142.21 Minimum production schedule. ( a ) Upon receipt of the supplement to the plan of operations described in § 3142.10(b), the authorized officer will examine the information furnished by the lessee and determine if the estimate of the recoverable tar sand reserves is adequate and reasonable. In making this determination, the authorized officer may request, and the lessee must furnish, any information that is the basis of the lessee's estimate of the recoverable tar sand reserves. As part of the authorized officer's determination that the estimate of the recoverable tar sand reserves is adequate and reasonable, the authorized officer may consider, but is not limited to, the following: ore grade, strip ratio, vertical and horizontal continuity, extract process recoverability, and proven or unproven status of extraction technology, terrain, environmental mitigation factors, marketability of products and capital operations costs. The authorized officer will then establish as soon as possible, but prior to the beginning of the eleventh year, based upon the estimate of the recoverable tar sand reserves, a minimum annual tar sand production schedule for the lease or unit operations which will start in the eleventh year of the lease. This minimum production level will escalate in equal annual increments to a maximum of 1 percent of the estimated recoverable tar sand reserves in the twentieth year of the lease and remain at 1 percent each year thereafter.
( b ) The minimum annual tar sand production schedule for the lease or unit operations will be set at a level for paying quantities. If the operator or lessee cannot establish production in paying quantities, the lease will terminate at the end of the lease's primary term.