alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Michael Chang, CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K-SB/A of Myoffiz, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to
us by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.




Date:  March 15, 2004

                              /s/ MICHAEL CHANG
                              ---------------------------
                              Michael Chang
                              CFO
Table of Contents

Exhibit8

Subsidiaries of StealthGas Inc.

Access Consultants Co.

AlexisShipholding S.A.

Aracruz Trading Ltd.

Atlas Investments S.A.

AubineServices Ltd.

Balcan Profit Limited

Balkan Holding Inc.

BaronessHoldings Inc.

Cedric Finance Inc.

Celidon Investments Inc.

Continent Gas Inc.

DeloraTrading Company

Drew International Inc.

East Propane Inc.

EmpireSpirit Ltd.

Fairdeal Enterprises Corp.

Floyd Properties Co.

Gaz deBrazil Inc.

Geneve Butane Inc.

Grazia Maritime Ltd.

HeatherTrading S.A.

Iceland Limited

Independent Trader Ltd.

Industrial Gases Inc.

Industrial Materials Inc.

Jungle Investment Limited

Kalinda Shipmanagement Ltd.

Leader Investments Inc.

Lpgone Ltd.

Lyonet HoldingsCorp.

Matrix Gas Trading Ltd.

Melvyn Services Company

Neutron Marine Corp.

NorthernYield Shipping Limited

Ocean Blue Limited

Odelyn Enterprises Co.

OswaldTrading Limited

Oxford Gas Ltd.

Pacific Gases Ltd.

PetchemTrading Inc.

Quinta Trading Co.

Reina Properties Corp.

Sabrina Enterprises S.A.

Scope InternationalInc.

Semichlaus Exports Ltd.

Soleil Trust Inc.

SomerShipmanagement S.A.

Stellar ManagementLimited

Transgalaxy Inc.

Triathlon Inc.

VCM TradingLtd.

Ventspils GasesLtd.

----
### §727. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 23, 1954, ch. 831, §7, 68 Stat. 769, which provided that nothing in this subchapter would affect the status of the members of the tribes as citizens of the United States, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §677d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1009, §5, 68 Stat. 868; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 880, §1, 70 Stat. 936, which provided that, effective on the date of publication of the final rolls, the tribe was to consist exclusively of full-blood members, and which provided for new membership to be thereafter determined by the constitution and bylaws of the tribe and ordinances enacted thereunder, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §349. Patents in fee to allottees

At the expiration of the trust period and when the lands have been conveyed to the Indians by patent in fee, as provided in section 348 of this title, then each and every allottee shall have the benefit of and be subject to the laws, both civil and criminal, of the State or Territory in which they may reside; and no Territory shall pass or enforce any law denying any such Indian within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law: Provided, That the Secretary of the Interior may, in his discretion, and he is authorized, whenever he shall be satisfied that any Indian allottee is competent and capable of managing his or her affairs at any time to cause to be issued to such allottee a patent in fee simple, and thereafter all restrictions as to sale, incumbrance, or taxation of said land shall be removed and said land shall not be liable to the satisfaction of any debt contracted prior to the issuing of such patent: Provided further, That until the issuance of fee-simple patents all allottees to whom trust patents shall be issued shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States: And provided further, That the provisions of this Act shall not extend to any Indians in the former Indian Territory.

(Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, §6, 24 Stat. 390; May 8, 1906, ch. 2348, 34 Stat. 182.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, 24 Stat. 388, and is popularly known as the Indian General Allotment Act. For classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 331 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Provisions relating to the grant of citizenship to certain Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States were omitted in view of act June 2, 1924, ch. 233, 43 Stat. 253, which granted citizenship to all non-citizen Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States. See section 1401 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.
#### § 3206.13 What is the maximum acreage I may hold?

You may not directly or indirectly hold more than 51,200 acres in any one state.
### §3106. Forest trespass

#### (a) Civil penalties; regulations

Not later than 18 months from November 28, 1990, the Secretary shall issue regulations that—

(1) establish civil penalties for the commission of forest trespass which provide for—

(A) collection of the value of the products illegally removed plus a penalty of double their value,

(B) collection of the costs associated with damage to the Indian forest land caused by the act of trespass, and

(C) collection of the costs associated with enforcement of the regulations, including field examination and survey, damage appraisal, investigation assistance and reports, witness expenses, demand letters, court costs, and attorney fees;

(2) designate responsibility with the Department of the Interior for the detection and investigation of forest trespass; and

(3) set forth responsibilities and procedures for the assessment and collection of civil penalties.

#### (b) Treatment of proceeds

The proceeds of civil penalties collected under this section shall be treated as proceeds from the sale of forest products from the Indian forest lands upon which such trespass occurred.

#### (c) Concurrent jurisdiction

Indian tribes which adopt the regulations promulgated by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (a) shall have concurrent civil jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this section and the regulation promulgated thereunder. The Bureau of Indian Affairs and other agencies of the Federal Government shall, at the request of the tribe, defer to tribal prosecutions of forest trespass cases. Tribal court judgments regarding forest trespass shall be entitled to full faith and credit in Federal and State courts to the same extent as a Federal court judgment obtained under this section.

(Pub. L. 101–630, title III, §307, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4537.)
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed February 18, 2020 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-95-00110-CV 

OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, Appellant 

V. 

ALTON RAY JEFFERSON, SR., JOSEPHINE JEFFERSON, ROBERT ECHOL 

BOLEWARE, JR., ELLEN BOLEWARE, JOHN ALFRED CLEMENTS, MARY 

CLEMENTS, FRED M. MORAN, JR., MARY SUE WRIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ALVIE WRIGHT, DECEASED, 

RUFUS KIMMON BOX, MARY BOX, RICHARD USLESS PARNELL, HELEN 

PARNELL, ARNOLD FRANKLIN EARNEST, BETTY EARNEST, PERRY JOSEPH 

BROADHEAD, MARY BROADHEAD, THOMAS GLEN YOUNG, EDITH YOUNG, 

ROBERT STONE BROOKS, VIDA MAE BROOKS, HOYET FRANKLIN PETERSON, 

JOYCE PETERSON, JOHN HENRY NIEDERGESES, MAGDALENE NIEDERGESES, 

WILLIAM LEE KELLEY, ROSA LEE KELLEY, RICHARD ALLEN BODDIE, 

SADIE BODDIE, HOUSTON A. YEAGER, LOWELL EDGAR HAMBURGER, 

AND BRINDA HAMBURGER, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 94-7824-G 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Myers, Whitehill, and Pedersen, III 

Opinion by Justice Whitehill 

We reinstate this appeal. The appeal was abated to allow the parties to pursue a settlement. 

 Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal because the parties 

have settled their differences. 

 
 –2– 

 We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

950110F.P05 

 

/Bill Whitehill/ 

BILL WHITEHILL 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS 

CORPORATION, Appellant 

No. 05-95-00110-CV V. 

ALTON RAY JEFFERSON, SR., 

JOSEPHINE JEFFERSON, ROBERT 

ECHOL BOLEWARE, JR., ELLEN 

BOLEWARE, JOHN ALFRED 

CLEMENTS, MARY CLEMENTS, FRED 

M. MORAN, JR., MARY SUE WRIGHT, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE 

OF ALVIE WRIGHT, DECEASED, 

RUFUS KIMMON BOX, MARY BOX, 

RICHARD USLESS PARNELL, HELEN 

PARNELL, ARNOLD FRANKLIN 

EARNEST, BETTY EARNEST, PERRY 

JOSEPH BROADHEAD, MARY 

BROADHEAD, THOMAS GLEN 

YOUNG, EDITH YOUNG, ROBERT 

STONE BROOKS, VIDA MAE BROOKS, 

HOYET FRANKLIN PETERSON, JOYCE 

PETERSON, JOHN HENRY 

NIEDERGESES, MAGDALENE 

NIEDERGESES, WILLIAM LEE 

KELLEY, ROSA LEE KELLEY, 

RICHARD ALLEN BODDIE, 

 On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 94-7824-G. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. 

Justices Myers and Pedersen, III 

participating. 
 –4– 

SADIE BODDIE, HOUSTON A. 

YEAGER, LOWELL EDGAR 

HAMBURGER, 

AND BRINDA HAMBURGER, Appellees 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of this appeal. 

Judgment entered February 18, 2020
#### § 2650.4 Conveyance reservations.
#### Van Winkle *vs.*Earl.

A statement in a deed that the conveyance is made subject to certain-mortgages (among -which is the one sought to be foreclosed) *held,*not to deprive the grantee of the right to set up the defence of usury: it appearing that he did not purchase the property subject to those mortgages, oír any of them, and that the statement referred to was inserted merely with a view to preventing a breach of the covenant against encumbrances, it having been agreed that the grantor should remove all the encumbrances from the property; and the grantee having paid the full consideration off the purchase.

On final hearing, on pleadings and proofs,"

*Mr. James*Evans, for complainant,

*Mr. John G. Paulison,*for defendant.

The Chancellor.

This is an action for the foreclosure and sale of mortgaged' premises in Passaic county. After the mortgage in suit was-given, the mortgagor conveyed the premises to the defendant,, who still owns them. The latter defends against the mortgage, on the ground of usury. The taking of the usury is-admitted. It consisted in including in the mortgage (which was for a loan of $900) the sum of $100, as a premium for the loan. The complainant insists that the defendant cannot *243avail himself of the defence he sets up, because, by the deed to him, the premises are stated to be conveyed subject to f vrti’hi mortgages, among which is Him • f the complainant. It apj-. ers, however, from the itsevi --nd otherwise, that notwithstanding this statement, the defendant did not purchase the property subject to those mortgages, or any of them, and that the statement referred to was inserted merely with a view to preventing a breach of the covenant against encumbrances; it having been agreed that the grantor should remove all the encumbrances from the property. The defendant paid, and secured to be paid, the full consideration of the purchase. The deed conveys the property by word of grant, and contains a full covenant for quiet enjoyment, and a covenant of warranty general. Under these circumstances, the defendant is entitled to the defence. There will be a decree for the complainant for $886, being the amount of money advanced by him after deducting $14, the interest he has received on the premium. He will recover, neither interest nor costs.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPotential Application of NASA Aerospace Technology to Ground-Based Power SystemA review of some of the basic gas turbine technology being developed at the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, which may have the potential to be applied to ground-based systems, is presented in this paper. Only a sampling of the large number of research activities underway at the Glenn Research Center can be represented here. The items selected for presentation are those that may lead to increased power and efficiency, reduced cycle design time and cost, improved thermal design, reduced fatigue and fracture, reduced mechanical friction and increased operating margin. The topic of improved material will be presented in this conference and shall not be discussed here. The topics selected for presentation are key research activities at the Glenn Center of Excellence on Turbo-machinery. These activities should be of interest and utility to this ISABE (International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines) Special Forum on Aero-Derivative Land-Based Gas Turbines and to the power industry.Document ID20000014313Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPovinelli, Louis  A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Welch, Gerard E.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Bakhle, Milind A.*(Toledo Univ. OH United States)*Brown, Gerald V.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 2000Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209652E-12006NASA/TM-2000-209652ARL-TR-2142Meeting InformationMeeting: International Society for Air-Breathing EnginesLocation: FlorenceCountry: ItalyStart Date: September 5, 1999End Date: September 19, 1999Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,International Society for Air-Breathing EnginesFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-31-23PROJECT: DA Proj. 1L1-61102-AH-45Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000014313.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 3200.3 Changes in agency duties.

There are many leases and agreements currently in effect, and that will remain in effect, involving Federal geothermal resources leases that specifically refer to the United States Geological Survey, USGS, Minerals Management Service, MMS, or Conservation Division. These leases and agreements may also specifically refer to various officers such as Supervisor, Conservation Manager, Deputy Conservation Manager, Minerals Manager, and Deputy Minerals Manager. Those references must now be read to mean either the Bureau of Land Management or the Minerals Management Service, as appropriate. In addition, many leases and agreements specifically refer to 30 CFR part 270 or a specific section of that part. Effective December 3, 1982, references in such leases and agreements to 30 CFR part 270 should be read as references to this part 3200, which is the successor regulation to 30 CFR part 270.
FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS January 12, 2015 ABELACOSTA, CLERK BRANDON DANIEL Appellant VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee AP AP 77,034 * IN THE COURT * AP77.034 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 1/11/2015 10:16:59 PM Accepted 1/12/2015 7:12:33 AM ABEL ACOSTA CLERK

* OF CRIMINAL APPEALS * OF TEXAS

* AT AUSTIN, TEXAS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW, BRANDON DANIEL, Appellant, and files this Motion for 

### an Extension in which to file the Appellant's Brief. In support ofthis motion, appellant shows the Courtthe following: 

### Appellantwasconvictedin the403rdDistrictCourtofTravis County, Texas ofthe offense ofCapital Murder. The Appellantwas assessed Death. Appellant was sentenced on February 27, 2014. II. 

### The deadline for filing the Appellant's Briefis January 5, 2015 and Appellanthas requested three previous extensions. III.Attorney for the Appellant would further show the Court that he has been diligent in preparing Appellant's briefin this case. Counsel has completed the brief, but due to the nature ofthe case and sentence, counsel has asked two other 

### attorney's to verify his conclusions and analysis. Counsel is currently awaiting their responses and modifications before filing the brief. Counsel will file the briefwith or without corrections, on orbefore Friday, January 16, 2015. 

### WHEREFORE, Appellantprays the Court grant this Motion and extend the deadline for filing the Appellant's Briefto January 16, 2015. Respectfully Submitted, ARIEL PAYAN Attorney at Law 1012 Rio Grande Austin, Texas 78701 (512)478-3900 (512) 472-4102 (fax)

/s/ Ariel Payan ARIEL PAYAN State Bar No. 00794430 Arielpayan@hotmail.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### By my signature above, I hereby certify that a true and correct copy ofthe above and foregoing Motion for Extension ofTime to File Appellate Briefhas beendelivered to the Criminal District Attorney ofsaid County Texas, on January 11, 

### 2015 eitherby placing the same in the United States Mail, facsimile or electronic transmission orby hand delivering the same.
§ 3160.0-1 Purpose. The regulations in this part govern operations associated with the exploration, development and production of oil and gas deposits from— ( a ) Leases issued or approved by the United States;
( b ) Restricted Indian land leases; and
( c ) Those leases under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior by law or administrative arrangement including the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A). However, provisions relating to suspension and royalty reductions contained in subpart 3165 of this part do not apply to the NPR-A.
[67 FR 17894, Apr. 11, 2002]
**EXHIBIT 99.3**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annualreport of Landmark Bancorp, Inc(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report),I, Mark A. Herpich, PrincipalFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Mark A. Herpich         |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |
| Mark A. Herpich             |
| Principal Financial Officer |
|                        |
|                        |
| March 28, 2003              |

 

1

----
#### § 2911.2 Procedures.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1998

<CASH>                       13,455,874 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                   530,045 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             13,985,919 
<PP&E>                       34,183,685 
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               54,231,780 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,758,094 
<BONDS>                      54,284,674 
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                  (18,122,062)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 54,231,780 
<SALES>                       6,629,893 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              7,689,065 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 3,074,593 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,399,177 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            4,402,111 
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (1,186,816)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (961,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                2,601,685 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                  1,639,985 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      4.13 
<EPS-DILUTED>                      4.13 

        

</TABLE>