alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subscription (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vialta, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, that: (1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-K) of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company. Dated: March 31, 2005
    By:

/s/ Didier PietriDidier PietriChief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vilata,
Inc. and will be retained by Vialta, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2201]

[[Page 5243]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Policy Statement No. ANM-03-117-09]

Guidance for Demonstration of System, Hardware, and Software 
Development Assurance Levels on Transport Category Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of final policy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces the 
availability of policy on guidance for demonstration of software, 
hardware, and software development assurance levels on transport 
category airplanes.

DATES: The policy was issued by the Transport Airplane Directorate on 
January 15, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linh Le, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Transport Airplane Directorate, Transport Standards 
Staff, Safety Management Branch, ANM-117, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 
WA 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-1105; fax (425) 227-1100; e-mail: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion of Comments

    A notice of proposed policy was published in the Federal Register 
on February 25, 2003 (68 FR 8794). Six commenters responded to the 
request for comments.

Background

    The policy clarifies FAA certification policy on determination of 
system development assurance levels, hardware design assurance levels, 
and software levels for transport category airplanes.
    The policy, as well as the disposition of public comments received, 
is available on the Internet at the following address: http://www.airweb.faa.gov/rgl. If you do not have access to the Internet, you 
can obtain a copy of the policy by contacting the person listed under 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 15, 2004.
Ali Bahrami,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-2201 Filed 2-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 5, 2022

No. 04-20-00457-CV

WK PROPERTIES, INC.; WTK Services, Inc.; and WTK Properties, LTD.,

Appellants

v.

PERRIN SA PLAZA, LLC,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-19383

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

On November 24, 2021, this court issued its opinion affirming the trial court’s judgment.

On January 4, 2022, Appellee filed an “Unopposed Motion for Expedited Issuance of 

Mandate.” Appellee explained that the parties have reached a settlement agreement, and 

Appellee requests that the mandate be issued “on an expedited basis so that the settlement can be 

consummated.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c). 

Appellee’s unopposed motion is GRANTED. We direct the clerk of this court to issue 

the mandate immediately. See id. R. 18.1.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of January, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 277

 305

 357

 357

 279

 287

 292

 300

 306

 290

 294

 380

 429

 433

 439

 443

 451

 447

 463

 469

 473

 477

 489

 489

 481

 496

 499

 500

 498

 501

 241

 278

 307

 283

 262

 262

 269

 275

 283

 279

 278

 296

 384

 422

 424

 432

 441

 431

 444

 457

 466

 464

 475

 477

 471

 476

 490

 488

 483

 489

 258

 289

 328

 326

 266

 271

 285

 283

 298

 283

 283

 333

 412

 429

 430

 439

 446

 439

 453

 463

 470

 470

 481

 480

 477

 483

 494

 494

 491

 495

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 6,118

 6,196

 6,311

 6,415

 6,458

 6,516

 6,606

 6,690

 6,801

 6,876

 6,905

 6,951

 7,089

 7,275

 7,485

 7,723

 7,979

 8,234

 8,529

 8,837

 9,152

 9,472

 9,803

 10,125

 10,426

 10,716

 11,003

 11,292

 11,587

 11,849

 204

 207

 210

 214

 215

 217

 220

 223

 227

 229

 230

 232

 236

 243

 250

 257

 266

 274

 284

 295

 305

 316

 327

 338

 348

 357

 367

 376

 386

 395

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 477

 499

 510

 535

 575

 629

 654

 665

 662

 649

 647

 597

 588

 596

 599

 579

 510

 494

 512

 515

 505

 480

 437

 431

 458

 475

 450

 478

 511

 541

 559

 467

 473

 497

 502

 519

 536

 598

 653

 567

 577

 598

 580

 578

 586

 584

 512

 496

 476

 483

 501

 482

 438

 427

 417

 427

 449

 443

 447

 480

 512

 540

 472

 487

 504

 517

 555

 585

 636

 661

 644

 631

 625

 586

 583

 592

 592

 546

 504

 481

 505

 509

 497

 452

 432

 426

 446

 466

 446

 459

 495

 530

 551

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50073

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PABLO SEPULVERA-DIAZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-03-CR-1591-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Pablo Sepulvera-Diaz appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Sepulvera-Diaz contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Sepulvera-Diaz maintains that he
No. 04-50073

-2-

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Sepulvera-Diaz acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Henry C. Keywell et al., Appellants-Respondents, against Harry B. Chambers et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents-Appellants. [2162-2168 Broadway, Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ; Peek, P. J., dissents in part and votes to reverse and reinstate the assessments for the tax year 1944-45 upon the ground that the statutory exemption is not applicable to the City of New York. Settle order on notice.
- Skip to Primary Navigation
    - Skip to Main Content
    - Skip to Footer

        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   
        -   

      -  Water & Power          - Dams
        - Powerplants
        - Projects
        - Agrimet/Hydromet
        - Water Operations 
      -  Resources & Research          - Programs
        - Technical Service Center
        - Research & Development
        - Reclamation Manual
        - Reclamation Information Sharing Environment (RISE)
        - Environmental Resources/Reports
        - Library 
      -  About Us          - Mission
        - Fact Sheet
        - Commissioner
        - Addresses/Contacts
        - Organizational Chart
        - Leadership Bios
        - Employment
        - Contact 
      -  Recreation & Public Use          - Find Recreation
        - Recreation.gov
        - Public Use 
      -  News & Multimedia          - News Releases
        - News Stories
        - Speeches
        - Congressional Testimony
        - Fact Sheets
        - Photos
        - Multimedia
        - Social Media 

# California-Great Basin

Welcome to the Bureau of Reclamation California-Great Basin

            - Reclamation
            - California-Great Basin
            - CVP
            - Projects and Activities

Region 10              - Region 10 Home
              - About Us
              - Area Offices
              - Central Valley Project (CVP)                  - About the CVP
                - Water Info Links
                - Ratesetting
                - Projects/Activities
                - Consultation on the Coordinated Long-Term Operation                         of the CVP and SWP
                - Laws/Regs/Links
                - Financial Information 
                - Long-Term Water Transfer Program
                - Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) 
              - Programs & Activities
              - Projects & Facilities
              - Doing Business with Reclamation
              - Public Affairs
              - Employment
              - Recreation
              - Site Index
              - Contact Us

## Projects and Activities 

          - Cost Allocation Study  CVP-CAS  
          - Central Valley Project Municipal & Industrial Water Shortage Policy  (MANDI)
          - Central Valley Operations 
          CVO
Water Information sources 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Last Updated: 11/12/20*

## More Information about the Bureau of Reclamation

## Stay in Touch

          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   
          -   

          - Contact Us
          - Site Index
          - Accessibility
          - Disclaimer
          - DOI
          - FOIA
          - No Fear Act
          - Notices
          - Privacy Policy
          - Quality of Information
          - Recreation.gov
          - USA.gov
#### § 3505.25 How does BLM prioritize applications for prospecting permits?

BLM will prioritize applications based on the time of filing. If more than one application is filed at the same time for the same commodity on the same lands, we will hold a public drawing in accordance with subpart 1821 of this title to determine priority.
### §707. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 733, §17, 68 Stat. 728, which provided that nothing in this subchapter would abrogate any valid lease, permit, license, right-of-way, lien, or other contract approved before Aug. 13, 1954, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 3183.2 Designation of area.

An application for designation of a proposed unit area and determination of the required depth of test well(s) shall be filed in duplicate. A like number of counterparts should be filed of any geologic data and any other information submitted in support of such application.
§ 3503.46 When will BLM consult with Indian mineral owners when information concerning their minerals is the subject of a FOIA request? BLM will notify the Indian mineral owner(s) identified in the records of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), and the BIA, and give them a reasonable period of time to state objections to disclosure, using the standards and procedures of § 2.15(d) of this title, before making a decision about the applicability of FOIA exemption 4 to protect: ( a ) information obtained from a person outside the United States Government; when
( b ) following consultation with a submitter under § 2.15(d) of this title, BLM determines that the submitter does not have an interest in withholding the records that can be protected under FOIA; but
( c ) BLM has reason to believe that disclosure of the information may result in commercial or financial injury to the Indian mineral owner(s), but is uncertain that such is the case.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****NoxubeeNational Wildlife Refuge final comprehensive conservation plan [andenvironmental assessment] [electronic resource]**
 
SuDoc:I 49.44/3-2:N 86
ItemNumber:0612-C-02(online)
CGPsystem Number:000577290
 
Comprehensive Conservation Plan
Environmental Assesment
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Larger Foraminifera from Eniwetok Atoll drill holes

#### Professional Paper 260-V

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                
  (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp260V 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:05:42
### Subpart A—Empowerment Zone Employment Credit

Sec.
1396.
Empowerment zone employment credit.
1397.
Other definitions and special rules.
### §5805. Schools to business incubator pipeline

The Secretary shall facilitate the establishment of relationships between eligible applicants receiving funds through the program and educational institutions serving Native American communities, including tribal colleges and universities.

(Pub. L. 116–174, §6, Oct. 20, 2020, 134 Stat. 847.)
§ 2611.2 Period of segregation. ( a ) The States are allowed 10 years from the date of the signing of the contract by the Secretary in which to cause the lands to be reclaimed. If the State fails in this, the State Director may, in his discretion, extend the period for up to 5 years, or may restore the lands to the public domain at the end of the 10 years or any extension thereof. If actual construction of the reclamation works has not been commenced within 3 years after the segregation of the land or within such further period not exceeding 3 years as may be allowed for that purpose by the State Director, the State Director may, in his discretion, restore the lands to the public domain.
( b ) All applications for extensions of the period of segregation must be submitted to the State Director. Such applications will be entertained only upon the showing of circumstances which prevent compliance by the State with the requirements within the time allowed, which, in the judgment of the State Director, could not have been reasonably anticipated or guarded against, such as the distruction of irrigation works by storms, floods, or other unavoidable casualties, unforeseen structural or physical difficulties encountered in the operations, or errors in surveying and locating needed ditches, canals, or pipelines.
### §681. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 19, 1952, ch. 445, §1, 66 Stat. 139, which authorized a $100 payment to each member of the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of Minnesota alive on June 19, 1952, from proceeds of the sale of timber and lumber within the Red Lake Reservation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §§561, 562. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections, which related to fees for general services and medical services, were from the Interior Department Appropriation Act, 1946, July 3, 1945, ch. 262, §1, 59 Stat. 334, and were not repeated in the Interior Department Appropriation Act of 1947, July 1, 1946, ch. 529, 60 Stat. 348.
EXHIBIT 3.3
                                                     FORM 10-Q
                                  QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000



                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT


                     Pursuant to Section 18-202 of the
                       Limited Liability Company Act


               1.   The name of the limited liability company
     is American Industrial Partners Acquisition Company, LLC.

               2.   The Certificate of Formation is hereby
     amended to change the name of the limited liability
     company to Bucyrus Holdings, LLC.

               3.   Accordingly, Article 1. of the Certificate
     of Formation shall, as amended, read as follows:

                    "1.  The name of the limited liability
               company is Bucyrus Holdings, LLC."

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned authorized
     person has executed this Certificate of Amendment this
     25th day of March, 1999.

                         AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS
                         ACQUISITION COMPANY,LLC


                              By:/s/ Kenneth A. Pereira
                                  Kenneth A. Pereira
                                  Authorized Person
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JORDAN ANTHONY ANDRE NO. 2022 CW 0964

VERSUS

ARIANA MAE DELATTE SEPTEMBER 23, 2022

In Re: Jordan Anthony Andre, applying for rehearing and

rehearing en bans, Family Court in and for the Parish

of East Baton Rouge, No. 228575. 

BEFORE: WELCH, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ. 

APPLICATION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC DENIED. 

JEW

AHP

WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 449

 437

 434

 433

 441

 442

 441

 445

 447

 456

 451

 457

 475

 471

 498

 501

 483

 478

 474

 449

 494

 475

 495

 493

 464

 463

 407

 389

 372

 359

 364

 426

 425

 423

 423

 426

 431

 430

 430

 429

 429

 429

 429

 421

 416

 419

 406

 400

 400

 401

 394

 388

 374

 376

 373

 371

 365

 360

 360

 330

 328

 340

 432

 431

 427

 426

 429

 434

 435

 434

 434

 435

 436

 436

 439

 432

 436

 429

 419

 418

 416

 408

 408

 396

 397

 400

 391

 381

 369

 370

 352

 337

 349

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER