alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          57,238
<SECURITIES>                                   149,971
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,045
<INVENTORY>                                     36,548
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               316,510
<PP&E>                                          62,004
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 361,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,739
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,525
<OTHER-SE>                                     322,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   361,411
<SALES>                                         75,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,403
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,546
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,834
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,834
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        

</TABLE>
### §941f. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–116, §8, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1125, which related to transitional and provisional tribal government, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 172

 168

 170

 174

 175

 168

 158

 149

 152

 147

 144

 139

 136

 133

 127

 126

 127

 129

 132

 132

 134

 130

 125

 125

 126

 134

 134

 129

 128

 127

 167

 163

 164

 169

 169

 159

 148

 146

 147

 143

 139

 134

 132

 118

 122

 123

 125

 125

 127

 129

 130

 123

 122

 123

 123

 126

 129

 126

 124

 123

 170

 165

 167

 172

 173

 164

 153

 147

 150

 145

 142

 136

 134

 129

 125

 125

 126

 128

 130

 131

 132

 127

 123

 124

 125

 131

 130

 127

 126

 125

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 170

 335

 502

 674

 847

 1,011

 1,164

 1,311

 1,461

 1,606

 1,748

 1,884

 2,018

 2,147

 2,272

 2,397

 2,523

 2,651

 2,781

 2,912

 3,044

 3,171

 3,294

 3,418

 3,543

 3,674

 3,804

 3,931

 4,057

 4,182

 170

 168

 167

 169

 169

 169

 166

 164

 162

 161

 159

 157

 155

 153

 151

 150

 148

 147

 146

 146

 145

 144

 143

 142

 142

 141

 141

 140

 140

 139

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In conjunctionwith the filing of Intrusion Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael L. Paxton,Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of IntrusionInc. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly present, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Michael L. Paxton                                            | Date: |   May 13, 2003 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|-------|---------------------|
| Michael L. Paxton                                                |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |

 

----
### §610. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–534, §1, Sept. 28, 1968, 82 Stat. 884, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to purchase lands within, adjacent to, or in close proximity to the boundaries of the Swinomish Indian Reservation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Due to the file size of the CALPUFF visibility modeling files, they are not available from the electronic

docket. These files are available upon request.

Please email your request to: Michael Feldman (feldman.michael@epa.gov) or call 214‐665‐9793.

Thank you
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,331.34

 2,331.93

 2,332.62

 2,333.42

 2,334.27

 2,334.98

 2,335.62

 2,336.25

 2,336.98

 2,337.70

 2,338.35

 2,338.99

 2,339.64

 2,340.54

 2,341.24

 2,341.67

 2,341.95

 2,342.22

 2,342.44

 2,342.64

 2,342.82

 2,343.06

 2,343.38

 2,343.56

 2,343.78

 2,344.00

 2,344.17

 2,344.26

 2,344.30

 2,344.32

 1,864.0

 1,872.2

 1,881.8

 1,892.9

 1,904.8

 1,914.8

 1,923.8

 1,932.7

 1,943.1

 1,953.4

 1,962.7

 1,971.8

 1,981.2

 1,994.2

 2,004.4

 2,010.6

 2,014.7

 2,018.6

 2,021.8

 2,024.8

 2,027.4

 2,030.9

 2,035.6

 2,038.2

 2,041.5

 2,044.7

 2,047.2

 2,048.5

 2,049.1

 2,049.4

STORAGE

+6.9

+8.2

+9.6

+11.1

+11.9

+10.0

+9.0

+8.9

+10.4

+10.3

+9.3

+9.2

+9.4

+13.0

+10.2

+6.3

+4.1

+3.9

+3.2

+2.9

+2.6

+3.5

+4.7

+2.6

+3.2

+3.2

+2.5

+1.3

+0.6

+0.3

CHANGE

3,841

4,493

5,233

6,066

6,422

5,415

4,825

4,754

5,459

5,524

5,023

4,980

5,797

7,826

6,906

4,657

3,485

3,097

2,762

2,724

2,654

2,854

3,256

3,463

3,775

3,721

3,277

3,000

2,784

2,810

INFLOW

 293

 283

 315

 379

 334

 341

 183

 189

 168

 341

 254

 280

 1,015

 1,181

 1,672

 1,440

 1,428

 1,064

 1,066

 1,152

 1,252

 999

 800

 2,051

 2,011

 1,957

 1,925

 2,284

 2,405

 2,649

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 69

 98

 86

 66

 91

 46

 87

 71

 67

 4

 80

 72

 59

 85

 115

 64

 4

 47

 77

 99

 77

 86

 91

 82

 138

 138

 91

 48

 82

 13

C.F.S.

 .17

 .24

 .21

 .16

 .22

 .11

 .21

 .17

 .16

 .01

 .19

 .17

 .14

 .20

 .27

 .15

 .01

 .11

 .18

 .23

 .18

 .20

 .21

 .19

 .32

 .32

 .21

 .11

 .19

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .40

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .67

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2002 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 22, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +192.3 130,883 31,711 0 0 2,233 5.27 1.26

ACRE-FEET +192,300 259,606 62,899 0 0 4,429

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 62,899

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 62,899

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.26

JULY 1, 2001 31.81

 1,857.1

Table 4

(1) (1)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 860

 839

 815

 821

 821

 793

 746

 724

 672

 668

 689

 656

 501

 445

 321

 256

 216

 282

 276

 258

 116

 165

 162

 201

 254

 325

 336

 280

 301

 349

 796

 756

 753

 768

 779

 749

 690

 656

 605

 622

 650

 512

 395

 329

 258

 93

 74

 222

 257

 121

 97

 97

 144

 147

 204

 252

 287

 248

 254

 304

 822

 799

 791

 799

 792

 771

 709

 682

 632

 637

 670

 593

 440

 374

 288

 202

 118

 260

 265

 196

 104

 137

 149

 169

 232

 292

 318

 259

 274

 328

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 5, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 822

 1,621

 2,412

 3,211

 4,003

 4,774

 5,483

 6,165

 6,797

 7,434

 8,104

 8,697

 9,137

 9,511

 9,799

 10,001

 10,119

 10,379

 10,644

 10,840

 10,944

 11,081

 11,230

 11,399

 11,631

 11,923

 12,241

 12,500

 12,774

 13,102

 822

 811

 804

 803

 801

 796

 783

 771

 755

 743

 737

 725

 703

 679

 653

 625

 595

 577

 560

 542

 521

 504

 488

 475

 465

 459

 453

 446

 440

 437

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### § 3211.13 When is my annual rental payment due?

Your rent is always due in advance. MMS must receive your annual rental payment by the anniversary date of the lease each year. See the MMS regulations at 30 CFR part 218, which explain when MMS considers a payment as received. If less than a full year remains on a lease, you must still pay a full year's rent by the anniversary date of the lease. For example, the rent on a 2,000-acre lease for the 11th year, would be $10,000 ($5 per acre), due prior to the 10th anniversary of the lease.
#### § 3436.0-1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to establish criteria and procedures for the exchange of coal leases and for the exchange of fee held coal for unleased federally-owned coal in cases where surface coal mining operations on the lands that are covered by an existing coal lease or that are fee held would interrupt, discontinue or preclude farming on alluvial valley floors west of the 100th Meridian, west longitude, or materially damage the quantity or quality of water in surface or underground systems that supply those alluvial valley floors.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") on Form 10-KSB of First National Energy Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the "Registrant"), for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, I, Peter Wanner, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: March __, 2009



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ PETER WANNER           
| | Peter Wanner               
| | Chief Executive Officer and
| | Chief Financial Officer    



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### PART I—DEDUCTIONS

Sec.
611.
Allowance of deduction for depletion.
612.
Basis for cost depletion.
613.
Percentage depletion.
613A.
Limitations on percentage depletion in case of oil and gas wells. 1

614.
Definition of property.
[615.
Repealed.]
616.
Development expenditures.
617.
Deduction and recapture of certain mining exploration expenditures.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11801(b)(7), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–522, struck out item for part II "Exclusions from gross income".

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(b)(21)(H), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1798, struck out item 615 "Exploration expenditures".

**1969**—Pub. L. 91–172, title V, §§503(b), 505(c), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 631, 634, added items for parts IV and V.

Pub. L. 91–172, title V, §504(c)(5), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 633, substituted "Pre-1970 exploration expenditures" for "Exploration expenditures" in item 615 and substituted "Deduction and recapture of certain mining exploration expenditures" for "Additional exploration expenditures in the case of domestic mining" in item 617.

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–570, §1(d), Sept. 12, 1966, 80 Stat. 762, added item 617.

1  Editorially supplied. Section 613A added by Pub. L. 94–12 without corresponding amendment of part analysis.
### §850. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–281, §1(b)(3), May 15, 1978, 92 Stat. 246

Section, act Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 909, §10, 70 Stat. 965, provided for termination of supervision as not affecting prior claims filed by tribe against United States.
#### Barnett Mindich et al., Appellants, v. Sarah Brod et al., Respondents.

It does not sufficiently appear that plaintiffs are not the real parties in interest in this action to justify denial of the motion to examine before trial on that ground. As that is the only ground.on which the examination was denied and the only ground urged on this appeal for supporting the orders appealed from, the orders are unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion granted. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glen-non, Cohn, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §977. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 87–629, §7, Sept. 5, 1962, 76 Stat. 430, which provided that nothing in this subchapter would affect the rights, privileges, or obligations of the tribe or its members under the laws of Nebraska, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 3263.10 May I abandon a well without BLM's approval? ( a ) You must have a BLM-approved Sundry Notice documenting your plugging and abandonment program before you start abandoning any well.
( b ) You must also notify the local BLM office before you begin abandonment activities, so that we may witness the work. Contact your local BLM office before starting to abandon your well to find out what notification we need.
S a c r a

m

e n t o R i v e r

SSUUTTTTEE RR CCOO

CCOOLLUUSSAA CC OO

T14N R1E

T15N R1E

5

8

4 6

7 9

31 32 33

Grimes

72.1 L

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion

Contract No. 14-06-200-1898A-R-1

Exhibit B

Andreotti, Beverly F., et al.

725-202-4

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: October 28, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\andreotti_beverly\andreotti_beverly.mxd
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59281-59282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22232]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Change to the Retirement Plan for Manually Set Postage Meters

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Notice of change to the Retirement Plan for Manually Set 
Postage Meters.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: By this notice, the Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP> revises the 
Retirement Plan for Manually Set Postage Meters, published in the 
Federal Register on December 13, 2000, pages 77934-77938, for meters 
with lease expiration dates on or after October 1, 2004. The retirement 
date for these manually set electronic meters will be May 31, 2005. The 
Postal Service will no longer reset electronic manually set meters 
after February 28, 2005.

DATES: This notice is effective on October 4, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne A. Wilkerson, manager of Postage 
Technology Management, at (703) 292-3691 or by fax at (703) 292-4073.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice was published in the Federal 
Register on June 15, 2004, pages 33429-33430, with comments due on or 
before July 15, 2004. Written comments were received from the vendor 
community. There was no opposition to the proposal to retire all 
manually set electronic meters from service by May 31, 2005.
    An exception was taken to the proposed restriction on replacing a 
malfunctioning manually set meter with a functional meter of the same 
model. The Postal Service reconsidered its proposal and removed this 
restriction. Replacement meters will be permitted up to February 28, 
2005.
    You can review the comments received by submitting a request to the 
office of Postage Technology Management at (703) 292-3691 or by fax at 
(703) 292-4073.
    The final plan follows.

[[Page 59282]]

The Revised Plan For Manually Set Postage Meters

    The Postal Service retirement date for manually set electronic 
meters with lease expiration dates on or after October 1, 2004, will be 
May 31, 2005. The Postal Service will no longer reset electronic 
manually set meters after February 28, 2005. Anyone in possession of a 
manually set meter must return it to the meter provider on or before 
May 31, 2005. The meter provider will withdraw the meter from service.
    Any manually set electronic postage meter that is capable of remote 
meter setting must be either converted to remote meter setting or 
retired from service and returned to the meter provider. The function 
that allows manual setting must be disabled.
    The manager of Postage Technology Management, Postal Service 
Headquarters, will send official notification to those affected users 
with an explanation of this plan. Any other explanation received by 
users may not accurately represent the position of the Postal Service.

Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 04-22232 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
§ 2201.3-4 Appraisal review. ( a ) Appraisal reports shall be reviewed by a qualified review appraiser meeting the qualifications set forth in § 2201.3-1 of this part. Statements of value prepared by agency appraisers are not subject to this review.
( b ) The review appraiser shall determine whether the appraisal report: ( 1 ) Is complete, logical, consistent, and supported by a market analysis;
( 2 ) Complies with the standards prescribed in § 2201.3-3 of this part; and
( 3 ) Reasonably estimates the probable market value of the lands appraised.
( c ) The review appraiser shall prepare a written review report, containing at a minimum: ( 1 ) A description of the review process used;
( 2 ) An explanation of the adequacy, relevance, and reasonableness of the data and methods used by the appraiser to estimate value;
( 3 ) The reviewing appraiser's statement of conclusions regarding the appraiser's estimate of market value; and
( 4 ) A certification by the review appraiser to the following: ( i ) The review appraiser has no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of the review report; and
( ii ) The review appraiser has not, and will not, receive compensation that was contingent on the approval of the appraisal report.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES MCCREA and LESLIE MCCREA,

Appellants,

v.

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-267

[November 24, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Sandra Perlman, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE17-004637.

Melissa A. Giasi and Erin M. Berger of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for 

appellants.

Elizabeth K. Russo of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, and Steven 

Chackman of Bernstein, Chackman, Liss, Hollywood, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co., 660 So. 2d 300 

(Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

MAY, KLINGENSMITH and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 2932.30 Fees for Special Recreation Permits.