BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, DC

---------------------------------------------------------------

KYLA THORINGTON

, et al. :

:

Complainants, :

v. : Docket DOT

- OST

- 2013

- 0092

:

UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and :

PRIMEFLIGHT AIRLINE SERVICES, INC. :

:

Respondents. :

---------------------------------------------------------------

UNCONTESTED MOTION OF UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER

Communications with res pect to this document should be sent to:

Thomas Newton Bolling

Vice President and Deputy General Counsel

Richard A. Fiore

Associate General Counsel

- Litigation &

Intellectual Property

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

233 South Wacker Drive

11 th Floor

- HDQLD

Chicago, IL 60606

(872) 825

- 8068

(872) 825

- 7077

thomas.bolling@united.com

richard.fiore @united.com

Douglas P. Kelley

Senior Counsel

- Regulatory, Antitrust &

Competition

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

1600 Smith Street

HQSLG

- 15

Houston, TX 77002

(713) 324

- 5156

doug.kelley@united.com

May 1 5 , 2013 Karine R. Faden

Managing Counsel

- Regulatory,

Antitrust & Competition

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

1225 New York Avenue, N.W.

Suite 1100 DCALD

Washington, DC 20005

(202) 521

- 4363

karine.faden@united.com

Lorraine B. Hallowa y

Gerald F. Murphy

CROWELL & MORING LLP

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

(202) 624

- 2500

lhalloway@crowell.com

gmurphy@crowell.com

Counsel for

United Airlines , Inc.BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, DC

---------------------------------------------------------------

KYLA THORINGTON

, et al. :

:

Complainants, :

v. : Docket DOT

- OST

- 2013

- 0092

:

UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and :

PRIMEFLIGHT AIRLINE SERVICES, INC. :

:

Respondents. :

---------------------------------------------------------------

UNCONTESTED MOTION OF UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER

Pursuant to Rule 405 of the Department’s Rules of Practice

, Respondent United Airlines,

Inc. (“United”)

, respectfully moves for a n extension of time , to May 31 , 2013, to file its answer

to the Complaint of Contractor Employees Assisting Passengers of United Airlines at

Philadelphia International Airport filed by Complainants Kyla Th orington, Henry Carter, John

Stewart and Shante Smith on May 2, 2013 (the “Complaint”) in this proceeding

. United

discussed this motion with Complainants’ representative o n May 15, 2013, and Complainant s ’

representative advised that Complainants would hav e no objection to the extension sought by

United.

United submits that good cause exists to grant this uncontested motion. 1 Given the nature

of the legal issues raised in the Complaint , the location of Philadelphia International Airport

(PHL)

– a major air port at which United (and its United Express carriers) operate and contract

with Respondent PrimeFlight Aviation Services, Inc. (“PrimeFlight”)

, related actions involving

PrimeFlight at PHL and other airports , and the prospective involvement of other regulatory

1 See 14 C.F.R. § 302.405(b); see also, e.g. , Notice Granting Extension dated March

30, 2012 in Docket DOT

- OST

- 2012

- 0040.