alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10Q FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000894237
<NAME> VISION-SCIENCES INC.

<S>                        <C>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                        APR-01-1999             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                  1,587,925               2,224,863<F3>
<SECURITIES>                              566,390                 970,608<F3>
<RECEIVABLES>                           1,247,968               1,219,371<F3>
<ALLOWANCES>                              133,000                 130,000<F3>
<INVENTORY>                               780,465                 633,571<F3>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        4,131,585               5,017,105<F3>
<PP&E>                                  3,312,719               3,244,587<F3>
<DEPRECIATION>                          2,669,082               2,561,713<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          6,351,561               7,882,336<F3>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   2,613,518               2,432,509<F3>
<BONDS>                                         0                       0<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0                       0<F3>
<PREFERRED>                                     0                       0<F3>
<COMMON>                                  192,229                 192,119<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                              3,545,814               5,257,708<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            6,351,561               7,882,336<F3>
<SALES>                                         0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,501,173               1,876,735
<CGS>                                   1,289,142               1,564,922
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             881,489                 742,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        1,055,389<F1>            (36,714)<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (1,724,847)               (393,963)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0                       0
<CHANGES>                                       0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                          (1,724,847)               (393,963)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.09)                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.09)                   (.02)
<FN>
<F1> Includes 1,091,000 equity in loss of 3DV Systems
<F2> Interest and other income
<F3> Amounts are as of March 31, 1999
</FN>


</TABLE>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-298V

UNPUBLISHED

SONYA SIMS-CALDWELL,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: May 7, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Anne Carrion Toale, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.

Althea Walker Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On February 25, 2019, Sonya Sims-Caldwell filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et 

seq.,

2

(the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome 

(“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on November 24, 2017. 

Petition at 1, 3, 5. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office 

of Special Masters.

On May 4, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, Respondent concludes that “petitioner suffered the Table injury of GBS 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

following a flu vaccine within the Table time period, and there is not a preponderance of 

the medical evidence that petitioner’s GBS was due to a factor unrelated to the 

vaccination.” Id. at 9. Respondent agrees that the “claim also meets the statutory 

severity requirement as petitioner’s medical records show that she experienced 

sequelae of her GBS for more than six months.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Preliminary-Subject to Change Central Valley Project - California

Monthly Diversions in AF 2022

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 

CANALS

Contra Costa 2602 2313 7537 11902 9636 6040 6689 8123 7663 7Delta-Mendota 231354 77977 72663 53626 55870 54198 149108 166526 143644 63Actual Fed Dos Amigos 6555 12470 12380 20291 29862 42195 42112 21682 NA Madera 7839 0000 6563 43564 7928 0

Friant-Kern 87554 46039 5889 10090 15079 25244 51837 76081 50643 36Corning 18 180 0000000Folsom-South 1012 569 623 403 659 1488 1628 966 893 Tehama-Colusa 0 6373 5244 3509 9713 14924 14726 10925 6240 9

CACHUMA PROJECT

Tecolete Tunnel 750 1484 2029 1716 2244 2073 1900 1785 1797 1

ORLAND PROJECT

Stony Creek 0 0 3977 6992 12442 13530 14630 13522 9625 9North Canal 0 0 1551 2672 4806 5189 5984 5800 3939 3South Canal 0 0 2426 4320 7636 8341 8646 7722 5686 5

SOLANO PROJECT

Putah South Canal 2973 2658 14208 12948 19619 26646 32631 27575 20091 12
ACCEPTED

03-15-00032-CV

5625443

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

6/10/2015 3:33:49 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE 3RD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN, TEXAS 

CAUSE NUMBER 03-15-00032-CV 

SAM LOEB, JR. AND MOSAIC POOL & SPA, INC., APPELLANTS 

v. 

CLINT JONES AND ANGIE JONES, APPELLEES 

APPELLANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 

Pursuant to Rule 42, Tex. R. App. Proc., Appellants Sam Loeb, Jr. and 

Mosaic Pool & Spa, Inc. file this Motion to Dismiss and would show the Court: 

1. All parties to this case have entered into a settlement agreement. 

2. Appellants no longer wish to prosecute this appeal and ask that this Court 

dismiss this proceeding. 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: ---""------1 

Michael Flo 

SBN: 07157725 

Email: floreanilaw@gmail.com 

13500 Ranch Rd. 12, Ste. E 

Wimberley, TX 78676 

Telephone: 722-3692 

Facsimile: 532-6594 

Attorney for Appellants 

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/10/2015 3:33:49 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

I cetiify that on June 10, 2015 I conferred with counsel for Appellees 

regarding this Motion to Dismiss and the motion is not opposed. 

' 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I cetiify that on June 10, 2015 a true and correct copy of Appellants' Motion 

to Dismiss was served to each person listed below by the method indicated. 

Michael F oreani 

E-mail: floreanilaw@gmail.com 

Clint Jones 

Attorney for Clint Jones and Angie Jones 

E-mail: clint@thevillageatwolfcreek.com 

Date: June 10, 2015 Time: 2:52p.m. CST 

Document was Electronically Served, and 

Electronic Transmission was Repmied as Complete
#### § 702.319 Obtaining documents from the administrative file for reintroduction at formal hearings.

Whenever any party considers any document in the administrative file essential to any further proceedings under the Act, it is the responsibility of such party to obtain such document from the district director and reintroduce it for the record before the administrative law judge. The type of document that may be obtained will be limited to documents previously submitted to the district director, including documents or forms with respect to notices, claims, controversions, contests, progress reports, medical services or supplies, etc. The work products of the district director or his staff will not be subject to retrieval. The procedure for obtaining documents will be for the requesting party to inform the district director in writing of the documents he wishes to obtain, specifying them with particularity. Upon receipt, the district director must promptly forward a copy of the requested materials to the requesting party. A copy of the letter of request and a statement of whether it has been satisfied must be kept in the case file.

[80 FR 12930, Mar. 12, 2015]
#### § 3176.5 Requirements.

The requirements of this subpart are the minimum acceptable standards with regard to H2S operations. This subpart also classifies violations as typically major or minor for purposes of the assessment and penalty provisions of 43 CFR part 3160, subpart 3163, specifies the corrective action which will probably be required, and establishes the normal abatement period following detection of a major or minor violation in which the violator may take such corrective action without incurring an assessment. However, the authorized officer may, after consideration of all appropriate factors, require reasonable and necessary standards, corrective actions, and abatement periods that may, in some cases, vary from those specified in this subpart that he/she determines to be necessary to protect public health and safety, the environment, or to maintain control of a well to prevent waste of Federal mineral resources. To the extent such standards, actions, or abatement periods differ from those set forth in this subpart, they may be subject to review pursuant to 43 CFR 3165.3.
### §1774a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–503, §3, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1293, which set out definitions for this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Theresa Senior, an Infant, etc., Appellant, *v.*The Sun Printing and Publishing Association, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 5th day of December, 1913, denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings and sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

Per Curiam:

We think, from a consideration of the publication and the innuendo, that the jury would be justified in finding that the publication was libelous *per se,*and, therefore, it was error to sustain the demurrer to the complaint. It follows that the order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to withdraw the demurrer and to answer on payment of said costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Scott and Dowling, JJ., dissented. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer and to answer on payment of said costs.
§ 2802.11 How does the BLM designate right-of-way corridors and designated leasing areas? ( a ) The BLM may determine the locations and boundaries of right-of-way corridors or designated leasing areas during the land use planning process described in part 1600 of this chapter. During this process, the BLM coordinates with other Federal agencies, State, local, and tribal governments, and the public to identify resource-related issues, concerns, and needs. The process results in a resource management plan or plan amendment, which addresses the extent to which you may use public lands and resources for specific purposes.
( b ) When determining which public lands may be suitable for right-of-way corridors or designated leasing areas, the BLM may consider various factors, including: ( 1 ) Federal, State, Tribal, and local land use plans, and applicable Federal, State, Tribal, and local laws;
( 2 ) Environmental impacts on cultural resources and natural resources, including air, water, soil, fish, wildlife, and vegetation;
( 3 ) Physical effects and constraints on corridor placement or leasing areas due to geology, hydrology, meteorology, soil, or land forms;
( 4 ) Costs of construction, operation, and maintenance and costs of modifying or relocating existing facilities in a proposed right-of-way corridor or designated leasing area (*i.e.,* the economic efficiency of placing a right-of-way within a proposed corridor or providing a lease inside a designated leasing area);
( 5 ) Risks to national security;
( 6 ) Potential health and safety hazards imposed on the public by facilities or activities located within the proposed right-of-way corridor or designated leasing area;
( 7 ) Social and economic impacts of the right-of-way corridor or designated leasing area on public land users, adjacent landowners, and other groups or individuals;
( 8 ) Transportation and utility corridor studies previously developed by user groups; and
( 9 ) Engineering and technological compatibility of proposed and existing facilities.
( 10 ) Access to electric transmission; and
( 11 ) Whether there are areas for solar and wind energy development with low potential for conflict with resources or uses due to environmental, cultural, and other relevant criteria, which the BLM will identify by: ( i ) Assessing the demand for new or expanded areas;
( ii ) Applying environmental, cultural, and other screening criteria; and
( iii ) Analyzing proposed areas through the land use planning process described in part 1600 of this chapter.
( c ) BLM may designate any transportation and utility corridor existing prior to October 21, 1976, as a transportation and utility corridor without further review.
( d ) The resource management plan or plan amendment may also identify areas where the BLM will not allow right-of-way corridors or designated leasing areas for environmental, safety, or other reasons.
[70 FR 21058, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 81 FR 92207, Dec. 20, 2016; 89 FR 35677, May 1, 2024]
§ 3171.22 Well conversions. ( a ) *Conversion to an injection well.* When subsequent operations will result in a well being converted to a Class II injection well (*i.e.,* for disposal of produced water, oil and gas production enhancement, or underground storage of hydrocarbons), the operator must file with the appropriate BLM office a Sundry Notice, Notice of Intent to Convert to Injection on Form 3160-5. The BLM and the surface managing agency, if applicable, will review the information to ensure its technical and administrative adequacy. Following the review, the BLM, in consultation with the surface managing agency, where applicable, will decide upon the approval or disapproval of the application based upon relevant laws and regulations and the circumstances (*e.g.,* the well used for lease or non-lease operations, surface ownership, and protection of subsurface mineral ownership). The BLM will determine if a Right-of-Way or Special Use Authorization and additional bonding are necessary and notify the operator.
( b ) *Conversion to a water supply well.* In cases where the surface managing agency or private surface owner desires to acquire an oil and gas well and convert it to a water supply well or acquire a water supply well that was drilled by the operator to support lease operations, the surface managing agency or private surface owner must inform the appropriate BLM office of its intent before the approval of the APD in the case of a dry hole and no later than the time a Notice of Intent to Abandon is submitted for a depleted production well. The operator must abandon the well according to BLM instructions, and must complete the surface cleanup and reclamation, in conjunction with the approved APD, Surface Use Plan of Operations, or Notice of Intent to Abandon, if the BLM or the FS require it. The surface managing agency or private surface owner must reach agreement with the operator as to the satisfactory completion of reclamation operations before the BLM will approve any abandonment or reclamation. The BLM approval of the partial abandonment under this section, completion of any required reclamation operations, and the signed release agreement will relieve the operator of further obligation for the well. If the surface managing agency or private surface owner acquires the well for water use purposes, the party acquiring the well assumes liability for the well.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T34N

T35N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

Cora

Merna

Daniel

Boulder

Pinedale

LaBarge

Marbleton

Big Piney

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

APPROVED PINEDALE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

Disposal - Exchange or Sale

Recreation and Public Purpose

Stock Driveway

Land Tenure Adjustments

Map 2-31

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-13418

 

CENTURY PROPERTIES GROWTHFUND XXII, LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
### §443c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 443c was editorially reclassified as section 1684 of this title.
§ 2885.17 What happens if I do not pay rents and fees or if I pay the rents or fees late? ( a ) If BLM does not receive the rent payment within 15 calendar days after the rent was due under § 2885.16 of this subpart, BLM will charge you a late payment fee of $25.00 or 10 percent of the rent you owe, whichever is greater, not to exceed $500 per authorization.
( b ) If BLM does not receive your rent payment and late payment fee within 30 calendar days after rent was due, BLM may collect other administrative fees provided by statute.
( c ) If BLM does not receive your rent, late payment fee, and any administrative fees within 90 calendar days after the rent was due, BLM may terminate your grant under § 2886.17 of this part and you may not remove any facility or equipment without BLM's written permission. The rent due, late payment fees, and any administrative fees remain a debt that you owe to the United States.
( d ) If you pay the rent, late payment fees, and any administrative fees after BLM has terminated the grant, BLM does not automatically reinstate the grant. You must file a new application with BLM. BLM will consider the history of your failure to timely pay rent in deciding whether to issue you a new grant.
( e ) The BLM will retroactively bill for uncollected or under-collected rent, including late payment and administrative fees.
( f ) You may appeal any adverse decision BLM takes against your grant or TUP under § 2881.10 of this part.
( g ) The BLM will not approve any further activities associated with your right-of-way until the BLM receives any outstanding payments that are due.
[70 FR 21078, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 81 FR 92228, Dec. 19, 2016; 89 FR 25975, Apr. 12, 2024]
§ 3137.100 How must I allocate production to the United States when a participating area includes unleased Federal lands? ( a ) When a participating area includes unleased Federal lands, you must allocate production as if the unleased Federal lands were leased and committed to the unit agreement (*see* §§ 3137.80 and 3137.81 of this subpart). The obligation to pay royalty for production attributable to unleased Federal lands accrues from the later of the date the— ( 1 ) Committed leases in the participating area that includes unleased Federal lands receive a production allocation; or
( 2 ) Previously leased tracts within the participating area become unleased.
( b ) The royalty rate applicable to production allocated to unleased Federal lands is the greater of 121 ⁄ 2 percent or the highest royalty rate for any lease committed to the unit.
( c ) The value of the production must be determined under the Minerals Management Service's oil and gas product value regulations at 30 CFR part 206.
Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed July 7, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00157-CV

____________

ORLANDO TARANGO MARTINEZ AND SONYA ANN MARTINEZ, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF MINOR, MARIAH 

ALEXANDRIA MARTINEZ, DESTINY JANAY MARTINEZ, 

JULISSA AMARIE MARTINEZ AND ORLANDO MARTINEZ, JR., 

Appellants

V.

DCP MIDSTREAM, LP, JOHN PAUL WHITE AND MARK ANTHONY 

BARERRA, Appellees

On Appeal from the 11th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-60902

ABATEMENT ORDER

On June 28, 2016, the parties filed a joint motion to abate the appeal pending 

a limited remand to approve a settlement agreement. The motion is granted. 

Accordingly, we issue the following order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket until September 15, 2016. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s 

active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or 

other dispositive motion. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to 

reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its 

own motion.

PER CURIAM