alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2.35 Will you receive notification of activities involving the submitter? If any of the following occur, the bureau will notify you: ( a ) The bureau provides the submitter with notice and an opportunity to object to disclosure;
( b ) The bureau notifies the submitter of its intent to disclose the requested information; or
( c ) A submitter files a lawsuit to prevent the disclosure of the information.
#### Meeker *vs.*Disse and wife.

$100 of the $1600 for which the mortgage was given in pursuance of an agreement between the mortgagor and mortgagee, *held*to have been a premium for the loan, and the usury sufficiently pleaded.

On final hearing, on pleadings and proofs.

*Mr. J. Alward,*for complainant.

*Mr. J. Whitehead,*for Mary Disse.

The Chancellor.

The defence of usury set up in the answer of Disse and wife, the mortgagors, is sufficiently pleaded, and is proved. Disse negotiated the' loan which the complainant’s mortgage was given to secure. His negotiation was with the complainant in person. He testifies that the latter, when he applied *219to him for the loan, asked him how much he wanted, and that he replied $1500; that, thereupon, the complainant asked him how much per cent, he would give, and Disse answered “ $100,” and on Disse’s remarking that.he had not the money then, the complainant said, “well, you borrow $1500, but we will make it $1600.” By the complainant’s direction the mortgage was made to secure the payment of $1600. It bore interest at the rate of seven per cent, per annum. The complainant, though sworn in the cause, was not examined on the subject of the alleged usury, and the statement of Disse stands wholly uncontradicted. That the loan was of the sum of §1500 only, and that the mortgage was made for $1600, in pursuance of an agreement between Disse and the complainant that $100 should be included in it for premium for the loan, there seems to be no room to doubt. The complainant, therefore, will not be entitled to either interest or costs.
§ 3192.9 What terms must a cooperative agreement contain? The cooperative agreement must— ( a ) State its purpose, objective, and authority;
( b ) Define terms used in the agreement;
( c ) Describe the Indian lands covered;
( d ) Describe the roles and responsibilities of BLM and the Tribe or State;
( e ) Describe the activities the Tribe or State will carry out;
( f ) Define the minimum performance standards to evaluate Tribal or State performance;
( g ) Include provisions to— ( 1 ) Protect proprietary data, as provided in § 3190.1 of this part;
( 2 ) Prevent conflict of interest, as provided in § 3192.14(d);
( 3 ) Share civil penalties, as provided in § 3192.11; and
( 4 ) Terminate the agreement;
( h ) List BLM and Tribal or State contacts;
( i ) Avoid duplication of effort between BLM and the Tribe or State when conducting inspections;
( j ) List schedules for— ( 1 ) Inspection activities;
( 2 ) Training of Tribal or State inspectors;
( 3 ) Periodic reviews and meetings;
( k ) Specify the limit on the dollar amount of Federal funding;
( l ) Describe procedures for Tribes or States to request payment reimbursement;
( m ) Describe allowable costs subject to reimbursement; and
( n ) Describe plans for BLM oversight of the cooperative agreement.
EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the form 10-K of Health Discovery
Corporation formerly Direct Wireless Communications Inc. for the Year
ended December 31, 2003, I, Robert S. Braswell IV, Chief Administrative
Officer of Direct Wireless, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that;

such Form 10-K for the year ended, December 31, 2003, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in such Form 10-QSB
for the year ended, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of Health Discovery
Corporation.


/s/ Robert S. Braswell IV
----------------------------------
Robert S. Braswell IV
Chief Administrative Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 230

 236

 239

 247

 236

 231

 253

 240

 232

 227

 248

 210

 219

 222

 207

 210

 241

 229

 224

 236

 231

 226

 224

 226

 243

 257

 222

 217

 213

 217

 209

 215

 214

 211

 209

 207

 206

 206

 207

 208

 208

 206

 204

 203

 202

 196

 191

 191

 196

 199

 205

 203

 201

 207

 214

 217

 214

 212

 207

 202

 198

 195

 219

 219

 218

 219

 216

 212

 216

 213

 213

 212

 213

 206

 207

 207

 202

 196

 206

 206

 209

 216

 216

 208

 212

 217

 221

 221

 215

 212

 207

 204

 201

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 10, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
### §505. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 505 was editorially reclassified as section 5205 of this title.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign of a K-Band Transmit Phased Array For Low Earth Orbit Satellite CommunicationsThe design of a light weight, low cost phased array antenna is presented. Multilayer printed wiring board (PWB) technology is utilized for Radio Frequencies (RF) and DC/Logic manifold distribution. Transmit modules are soldered on one side and patch antenna elements are on the other, allowing the use of automated assembly processes. The 19 GHz antenna has two independently steerable beams, each capable of transferring data at 622 Mbps. A passive, self-contained phase change thermal management system is also presented.Document ID20000021566Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsWatson, Thomas*(Raytheon Systems Co. Plano, TX United States)*Miller, Stephen*(Raytheon Systems Co. Plano, TX United States)*Kershner, Dennis*(Raytheon Systems Co. Plano, TX United States)*Anzic, Godfrey*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 2000Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209779NASA/TM-2000-209779E-12064Meeting InformationMeeting: Phased Array Systems and TechnologyLocation: Dana Point, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: May 20, 2000End Date: May 26, 2000Sponsors:Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,AP,MTT,AESFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 632-50-51CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC3-497Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000021566.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22
- 0077 N.B., K.M.L.B., K.R.B., and K.R.B.,

Plaint iffs and Appellants,
v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, a Montana State Agency,

Defendant and Appellee. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parti es having failed to j oint ly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **John Greef,**  whose name appears ne xt o n th e list of attorneys desi

ring appo int me nt a s med iators fo r Money J udgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to co nduct th e mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat th e time peri ods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on th e date hereof. DATED thi s March 7, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood , Cl erk of the Supreme Court
c: Kathleen Mo lsberry , Matthew Lowy , Rutherford Hayes, John Greef 03/07/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0077
#### § 3135.1 Transfers and extensions, general.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gammacan International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Patrick Schnegelsberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  December 28, 2007 | By: /s/ Patrick Schnegelsberg |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                     | Patrick Schnegelsberg         |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer       |

 

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

Landmark Bancorp, Inc.:

 

We consent to incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement No. 333-103091 on Form S-8 of LandmarkBancorp, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2006, relating to theconsolidated balance sheets of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31,2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of theyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which reportappears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K ofLandmark Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP          |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
|                  |
|                  |
| Kansas City, Missouri |
| March 29, 2006   |

 

 

1

----
### **Subchapter R—Election To Determine Corporate Tax on Certain International Shipping Activities Using Per Ton Rate**

Sec.
1352.
Alternative tax on qualifying shipping activities.
1353.
Notional shipping income.
1354.
Alternative tax election; revocation; termination.
1355.
Definitions and special rules.
1356.
Qualifying shipping activities.
1357.
Items not subject to regular tax; depreciation; interest.
1358.
Allocation of credits, income, and deductions.
1359.
Disposition of qualifying vessels.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter R, consisting of section 1361, related to election of certain partnerships and proprietorships to be taxed as domestic corporations, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–389, §4(b)(1), Apr. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 116, effective Jan. 1, 1969.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 97-60774

Conference Calendar

__________________

MABROOR AHMED KHAN,

 Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

 Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A73 725 254

- - - - - - - - - - -

October 21, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mabroor Ahmed Khan petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal from the

immigration judge’s decision to deny his application for asylum

and for a withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the

record and the briefs and determine that the Board’s decision is

supported by substantial evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS,
No.

-2-

78 F.3d 194 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The petition for review is

DENIED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,340.03

 2,340.13

 2,340.28

 2,340.40

 2,340.64

 2,340.84

 2,340.95

 2,341.10

 2,341.22

 2,341.36

 2,341.49

 2,341.68

 2,341.85

 2,342.07

 2,342.29

 2,342.53

 2,342.76

 2,342.88

 2,342.98

 2,343.35

 2,343.61

 2,343.85

 2,344.07

 2,344.23

 2,344.43

 2,344.51

 2,344.74

 2,344.98

 2,345.24

 2,345.51

 2,346.22

 1,986.8

 1,988.3

 1,990.5

 1,992.2

 1,995.7

 1,998.6

 2,000.2

 2,002.3

 2,004.1

 2,006.1

 2,008.0

 2,010.8

 2,013.2

 2,016.4

 2,019.7

 2,023.2

 2,026.5

 2,028.3

 2,029.7

 2,035.2

 2,039.0

 2,042.5

 2,045.7

 2,048.1

 2,051.0

 2,052.2

 2,055.6

 2,059.1

 2,063.0

 2,066.9

 2,077.4

STORAGE

+1.2

+1.4

+2.2

+1.7

+3.5

+2.9

+1.6

+2.2

+1.7

+2.0

+1.9

+2.8

+2.5

+3.2

+3.2

+3.5

+3.4

+1.8

+1.5

+5.4

+3.8

+3.5

+3.2

+2.4

+2.9

+1.2

+3.4

+3.5

+3.8

+4.0

+10.5

CHANGE

1,025

1,042

1,262

1,300

1,848

1,900

1,427

1,167

1,303

1,101

1,266

1,483

1,764

1,710

1,984

1,867

1,908

1,727

1,754

3,058

2,600

1,873

1,730

1,753

1,540

1,915

1,799

2,299

2,330

2,419

5,592

INFLOW

 416

 286

 145

 373

 66

 422

 598

 52

 397

 32

 270

 51

 484

 52

 339

 57

 90

 788

 1,001

 324

 648

 56

 50

 509

 43

 1,231

 49

 466

 355

 346

 55

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 196

OUTLET

 26

 26

 21

 51

 30

 17

 26

 17

 26

 43

 43

 39

 34

 43

 26

 43

 125

 56

 17

 0

 30

 43

 52

 56

 13

 91

 43

 52

 39

 61

 44

C.F.S.

 .06

 .06

 .05

 .12

 .07

 .04

 .06

 .04

 .06

 .10

 .10

 .09

 .08

 .10

 .06

 .10

 .29

 .13

 .04

 .00

 .07

 .10

 .12

 .13

 .03

 .21

 .10

 .12

 .09

 .14

 .10

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .56

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .56

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .05

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .63

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2013 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 10, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +91.8 57,746 10,051 0 196 1,233 2.86 2.01

ACRE-FEET +91,800 114,539 19,936 0 389 2,446

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 19,936

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 389

 20,325

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.01

JULY 1, 2012 21.57

 1,985.7

Table 4

(1) (1)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 422

 413

 418

 411

 421

 416

 417

 428

 428

 422

 424

 431

 434

 448

 441

 441

 455

 457

 460

 462

 465

 466

 477

 488

 498

 502

 510

 527

 533

 538

 391

 391

 394

 397

 396

 394

 394

 394

 397

 401

 406

 408

 413

 417

 420

 424

 430

 433

 435

 438

 444

 450

 458

 466

 473

 482

 488

 498

 513

 522

 400

 399

 403

 402

 404

 403

 402

 407

 408

 410

 413

 416

 420

 424

 427

 431

 438

 440

 443

 447

 452

 457

 466

 474

 483

 490

 499

 514

 521

 530

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 686

 684

 709

 716

 733

 727

 720

 708

 700

 727

 739

 723

 708

 691

 725

 686

 660

 676

 630

 637

 651

 632

 629

 610

 591

 619

 605

 595

 607

 604

 617

 610

 610

 605

 621

 640

 651

 636

 642

 621

 630

 624

 618

 590

 586

 529

 484

 547

 538

 549

 540

 532

 520

 528

 525

 526

 632

 636

 641

 651

 649

 641

 649

 654

 662

 664

 666

 651

 647

 641

 644

 625

 612

 597

 548

 573

 575

 567

 557

 548

 543

 549

 545

 547

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 8, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                        FAMILY HOME HEALTH SERVICES INC.
                  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2005


1.       Subsidiary: Family Home Health Services, LLC
         State of Incorporation: Delaware
         Foreign Qualifications: Michigan
         Assumed Names: Family Home Health Services

2.       Subsidiary: FHHS, LLC
         State of Incorporation:  Michigan
         Foreign Qualifications: None
         Assumed Names: Family Home Health Services

3.       Subsidiary: Illinois Family Home Health Services, LLC
         State of Incorporation: Illinois
         Foreign Qualifications: None
         Assumed Names: Family Home Health Services
#### § 2430.1 Use of criteria.

In addition to the general criteria in subpart 2410 the following criteria will govern classifications under the authorities listed in § 2400.0-3 for sale, selection, grant or other disposal under the Public Land Sale Act (78 Stat. 988, 43 U.S.C. 1421-1427) and other laws authorizing the Secretary of the Interior to dispose of public lands. The criteria are set forth in terms of land use classes. Where appropriate, the applicability of specific disposal laws to lands in each use class is discussed.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000704 26-NOV-2021 07:58 AM Dkt. 77 MO
(No. 958

Claim denied.)

#### Cora D. Summer, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 10,*1927.

*Services*— when *State not liable.*Where claimant fails to comply with the requirements of the Civil Service Law no recovery can be had for personal injury sustained or services rendered while in the employment of a department of the State.

Pearl M. Hart, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank E. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant, Cora D. Summer, has filed in this court a claim in the total sum of $11,135.00, on account of a purported injury to her eye, and for extra work done while she was employed, under civil service, as" stenographer in the Attorney General’s office. To the petition filed on September 10, 1925, the Attorney General has filed a demurrer, which is sustained.

There is a large volume of testimony, and we believe there can be no question as to the ability of Miss Summer to handle the work assigned to her by her various employees. However, she has not complied with the requirements of the Civil Service Law necessary to entitle her to recover for any *285injury to her eye. She has received and accepted the salary allotted to her on acceptance of the positions which she held.

We believe that the Attorney General had the power and authority to discharge the claimant for the reasons set out, as required by the statute, and that he properly exercised his power. The claim is accordingly disallowed.
EXHIBIT 99.2

The
following certification accompanies the issuer's Annual Report of Form 10-KSB and is not filed, as provided in Release 33-8212, 34-47551 dated March 21, 2003.

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Coast Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Thomas J.
Sherman, Chief Financial Officer of Coast Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coast Bancorp and will be retained by Coast Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

Dated:
March 27, 2003

| | /s/ Thomas J. ShermanTHOMAS J. SHERMAN Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) | 
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                                                                                              | 

---

QuickLinks
#### § 3000.10 Nondiscrimination.

Any person acquiring a lease under this chapter must comply fully with the equal opportunity provisions of Executive Order 11246 dated September 24, 1965, as amended, and the rules, regulations and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor (41 CFR part 60 and 43 CFR part 17).
#### § 3283.7 When may unit operators be changed?

Unit operators may be changed only with BLM's written approval.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY 

 APPELLATE DIVISION 

 DOCKET NO. A-2302-22 

STATE FARM INDEMNITY 

COMPANY a/s/o SHIRLEY 

WELDON, 

 Plaintiff-Respondent, 

v.

ANGELA M. CATALFAMO, 

 Defendant/Third-Party 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v.

JUSTIN N. GONZALEZ, 

 Third-Party Defendant- 

 Respondent. 

__________________________

Argued April 16, 2023 – Decided April 23, 2024 

Before Judges Gooden Brown and Bergman. 

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law 

Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-4374-21.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE 

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION 

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
2 A-2302-22

Matthew E. Kennedy argued the cause for appellant 

(Leary, Bride, Mergner & Bongiovanni, PA, attorneys; 

Matthew E. Kennedy, of counsel and on the brief). 

Mark S. Hockman argued the cause for respondent 

State Farm Indemnity Company a/s/o Shirley Weldon 

(Law Offices of Stephen E. Gertler, attorneys; Mark S. 

Hockman, on the brief). 

PER CURIAM 

We have been advised prior to argument that this matter has been amicably 

adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
# NV_BLM__PLSS_AUs