alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: June 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 111)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 32857]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10jn10-9]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

37 CFR Part 256

 
Adjustment of Royalty Fee for Cable Compulsory License

CFR Correction

    In Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations, revised as of July 
1, 2009, on page 666, in Sec.  256.2, make the following changes:
    a. In paragraph (b)(2)(i), remove ``$189,800'' and add ``$263,800'' 
in its place; and
    b. In paragraph (b)(2)(ii), remove ``$189,800'' and add 
``$263,800'' in its place, and remove ``$379,600'' and add ``$527,600'' 
in its place.

[FR Doc. 2010-14060 Filed 6-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 568

 569

 585

 577

 593

 582

 596

 592

 603

 598

 614

 615

 629

 629

 634

 636

 639

 648

 655

 661

 664

 667

 674

 679

 685

 686

 703

 707

 721

 730

 737

 552

 558

 563

 570

 571

 576

 579

 583

 584

 588

 592

 599

 604

 614

 624

 625

 629

 635

 643

 648

 652

 658

 662

 663

 665

 671

 677

 686

 694

 703

 711

 559

 563

 571

 573

 577

 578

 584

 586

 589

 592

 601

 607

 616

 624

 628

 631

 635

 640

 648

 652

 657

 663

 668

 671

 674

 678

 687

 696

 706

 714

 721

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 887

 906

 904

 918

 907

 898

 898

 907

 901

 898

 901

 900

 878

 865

 871

 872

 821

 817

 810

 786

 776

 796

 789

 775

 738

 663

 604

 718

 722

 693

 759

 861

 878

 880

 892

 870

 881

 824

 829

 866

 872

 884

 884

 852

 848

 847

 837

 795

 791

 765

 725

 724

 763

 748

 737

 668

 375

 558

 562

 698

 665

 694

 875

 899

 892

 906

 880

 890

 881

 881

 883

 887

 890

 896

 870

 860

 864

 859

 804

 807

 788

 737

 757

 779

 772

 758

 703

 599

 589

 649

 710

 675

 735

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 27, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
AAM-12-090-E 

November 30, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10398 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1283 

Ms. Claudia Herrera 

President 

Group 3 Aviation 

16425 Hart Street 

Van Nuys, CA 91406 

Dear Ms. Herrera: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated November 11, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Group 3 Aviation for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would permit Group 3 Aviation, 

which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive 

employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Group 3 Aviation. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Group 3 Aviation an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to 

the extent necessary to permit Group 3 Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of 

the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to 

the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Group 3 Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Group 3 Aviation part 135 operation, not under the part 91. 

This exemption terminates November 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
|EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Richard J. Braun, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                         |                           
|------------------------ | --------------------------
|Dated:   August 14, 2003 | By:   /s/ Richard J. Braun
|                         | Richard J. Braun          
|                         | Chief Executive Officer   

|31
|--
### §1746. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 97–399, §7, Dec. 31, 1982, 96 Stat. 2015, which related to the rights and interests granted to the Miccosukee Tribe and the civil and criminal jurisdiction of the State of Florida, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 31.1

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Nigel Rulewski , certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Innovate Oncology,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
exchange act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 12, 2005

By: /s/ Nigel Rulewski
-----------------------------
Nigel Rulewski
CEO, President & Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
### §751. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1207, §11, 68 Stat. 1103, which provided that nothing in this subchapter would abrogate any valid lease, permit, license, right-of-way, lien, or other contract approved before Sept. 1, 1954, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Sacram

ento

River

SSUUTTTTEE RR CC OO

CCOOLL UUSSAA CCOO

T14N R1E

14

23

15

22 24

13

11

27 26

10 12

25

67.1 L

Contract No. 14-06-200-8658A-R-1

Exhibit B

Lonon, Michael E.

725-202-91

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

Date: November 10, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\lonon_michael_e\lonon_michael_e.mxd

0 0.25 0.5

Miles

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         [DELOITTE & TOUCHE LETTERHEAD]


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No.
333-82617 of Venture Holdings Company LLC (formerly Venture Holdings Trust) of
our report dated March 30, 1999, appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of
such Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the headings
"Selected Consolidated Financial Data" and "Experts" in such Prospectus.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

October 21, 1999
§ 3171.26 Appeal procedures. ( a ) Complete information concerning the review and appeal processes for BLM actions is contained in 43 CFR parts 4 and 3160, subpart 3165. Incorporation of a FS approved Surface Use Plan of Operations into the approval of an APD or a Master Development Plan is not subject to protest to the BLM or appeal to the Interior Board of Land Appeals.
( b ) The FS's decisions approving use of NFS lands may be subject to agency appeal procedures, in accordance with 36 CFR part 215 or 251.
( c ) Decisions governing Surface Use Plan of Operations and Special Use Authorization approvals on NFS lands that involve analysis, documentation, and other requirements of the NEPA may be subject to agency appeal procedures, under 36 CFR part 215.
( d ) The FS's regulations at 36 CFR part 251 govern appeals by an operator of written FS decisions related to Conditions of Approval or administration of Surface Use Plans of Operations or Special Use Authorizations to occupy and use NFS lands.
( e ) The operator may appeal decisions of the BIA under 25 CFR part 2.
§ 18.300 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 18.100 (a), does not apply in the case of any reasonable payment to a person, other than an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action, if the payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) The reporting requirements in § 18.110 (a) and (b) regarding filing a disclosure form by each person, if required, shall not apply with respect to professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, “professional and technical services” shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting or a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( d ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( e ) Persons other than officers or employees of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action include consultants and trade associations.
( f ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
Exhibit 10.2


 


Apex
Technology Acquisition Corp.


 


Amendment
No. 1 to Warrant Agreement


 


WHEREAS,
Apex Technology Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (the “Warrant
Agent”) entered into a Warrant Agreement dated September 16, 2019 (the “Original Warrant Agreement’);


 


WHEREAS,
Section 9.8 of the Original Warrant Agreement, as amended, provides that amendments may be made to the terms of the Original Warrant
Agreement without consent of any Registered Holder for the purpose of curing any ambiguity, or curing, correcting or supplementing any
defective provision contained in the Original Warrant Agreement;


 


WHEREAS,
the Company has identified a defective provision in Section 4.4 of the Original Warrant Agreement arising from the inclusion of added
words in the definition of “Per Share Consideration” that was not consistent with the intent of the parties.


 


All
capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the same meaning as these in the Original Warrant Agreement. Unless otherwise
specifically modified herein, the provisions of the Original Warrant Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1. Modification
of Definition. The Parties hereby agree that the definition of “Per Share Consideration” in Section 4.4 of the Original
Warrant Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:


 


“Per
Share Consideration’ means (i) if the consideration paid to holders of the Common Stock consists exclusively of cash, the amount
of such cash per share of Common Stock, and (ii) in all other cases, the volume weighted average price of the Common Stock as reported
during the ten (10) trading day period ending on the trading day prior to the effective date of the applicable event.”


 


2.
Parties in Interest. This Amendment is made solely for the benefit of the Warrant Holders and the Company, and their respective
controlling persons, directors and officers, and their respective successors, assigns, executors and administrators. No other person
shall acquire or have any right under or by virtue of this Amendment.


 


3.
Headings. The section headings in this Agreement have been inserted as a matter of convenience of reference and are not a part
of this Amendment.


 


4.
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.


 


	 	Apex
                    Technology Acquisition Corp.



	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Brad Koenig
	 	Name:	Brad
    Koenig
	 	Title:	Co-CEO
	 	 	 
	 	Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Isaac J. Kagan
	 	Name:	Isaac
    J. Kagan
	 	Title:	Vice
    President
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification Pursuant to
                   18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                   as Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


          In connection with the Annual Report of Myoffiz,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10K-SB for the period ended
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Chang, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                              By   /s/  Michael Chang
                                ------------------------
                              Michael Chang
                              Chief Financial Officer


January 14, 2004
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in theevent that publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  Science advice to NASA

PDF; EPUB; MOBI

SuDoc:NAS 1.21:2017-4557
Item Number:0830-I (online)
CGP system Number:001028601
§ 3425.4 Consultation and sale procedures. ( a ) ( 1 ) Prior to holding any lease sale in response to any application under this subpart, a public hearing shall be held on the environmental assessment or environmental impact statement, the proposed sale and the fair market value and maximum economic recovery on the proposed lease tract.
( 2 ) Prior to holding any lease sale under this subpart, the Secretary shall consult with the entities and individuals listed in §§ 3420.4-2 through 3420.4-5 of this title.
( b ) Subpart 3422 of this title applies in full to any sale to be held in response to an application filed under this subpart.
[47 FR 33142, July 30, 1982]
#### In the Matter of Barnett L. Hollander and Others.

Motion to» dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellants comply with terms stated in order. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 410

 401

 389

 373

 375

 362

 348

 348

 353

 372

 387

 387

 383

 379

 377

 379

 367

 374

 365

 373

 366

 362

 392

 384

 402

 419

 429

 462

 459

 478

 330

 328

 325

 324

 322

 320

 317

 315

 311

 308

 307

 309

 313

 316

 318

 319

 323

 329

 333

 334

 337

 342

 348

 355

 363

 379

 396

 420

 438

 446

 355

 351

 343

 340

 337

 335

 328

 326

 325

 330

 334

 334

 336

 337

 337

 338

 340

 345

 347

 349

 350

 350

 360

 365

 378

 393

 410

 436

 448

 456

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 11, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
### §640d–9. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §10, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1716; Pub. L. 96–305, §3, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 929; Pub. L. 100–666, §6, Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3932; Pub. L. 111–18, §1, May 8, 2009, 123 Stat. 1611, which related to treatment of lands partitioned to the Navajo Tribe or to the Hopi Tribe and protection of rights and property of individuals, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §564q. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §18, 68 Stat. 722, which related to termination of Federal trust relationship to the affairs of the tribe and its members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.