alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §385. Maintenance charges; reimbursement of construction costs; apportionment of cost

For lands irrigable under any irrigation system or reclamation project the Secretary of the Interior may fix maintenance charges which shall be paid as he may direct, such payments to be available for use in maintaining the project or system for which collected: Provided further, That all moneys expended under this provision shall be reimbursable where the Indians have adequate funds to repay the Government, such reimbursements to be made under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe: Provided further, That the Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to apportion the cost of any irrigation project constructed for Indians and made reimbursable out of tribal funds of said Indians in accordance with the benefits received by each individual Indian so far as practicable from said irrigation project, said cost to be apportioned against such individual Indian under such rules, regulations, and conditions as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe.

(Apr. 4, 1910, ch. 140, §§1, 3, 36 Stat. 270, 272; Aug. 1, 1914, ch. 222, §1, 38 Stat. 583; Aug. 7, 1946, ch. 770, §1(8), 60 Stat. 867; Pub. L. 97–293, title II, §224(f), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1273.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on sections 1 and 3 of act Apr. 4, 1910, and section 1 of act Aug. 1, 1914.

A provision in act Aug. 1, 1914, appropriated a specific sum for the construction, repair, etc., of ditches, reservoirs, etc., and for the pay of designated officials and employees.

#### Amendments

1982—Pub. L. 97–293 struck out provisions requiring Secretary of the Interior to transmit annual cost accounts to Congress of all moneys expended on each irrigation project.

1946—Act Aug. 7, 1946, discontinued provisions requiring Secretary of the Interior to transmit annual cost accounts to Congress of all moneys expended on each irrigation project.
#### § 2568.76 Do I need to pay any fees when I file my application?

No. You do not need to pay a fee to file an application.
% Food exposure 
% Once daily oral exposure, dose that will result in 10% AChE inhibition in RBC
% Female adult, Body weight set to 72.9 kg
% Cecilia Tan
% August 24, 2015

prepare @clear @all
% Setting model parameters
start @NoCallback
use human_parameters_MRP
use preg_female_parameters

BWSW=1;		% Set to 1 if BWT is provided
BWST=72.9;	% Initial BW in kg
PREG=0;
TSTOP= 504	% Exposure duration in hrs (21 days)

%21-day exposure
DT = xlsRead("Food1.xls", "POD", "A1:A22"); % Dosing Times
DORAL=xlsRead("Food1.xls", "POD", "B1:B22"); % Dose in ug/kg 
prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy
start@nocallback

mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6]; %conc unit = ug/L
save mytable @file='food_POD_M.txt' @format=ascii
DOMAIN
NAME ASSIGNMENT




This Domain Name Assignment, effective
as of December 30, 2009 ("Effective Date"), is by CarePayment, LLC, an Oregon
limited liability company having its principal office at 5300 Meadows Road,
Suite 400, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 ("Assignor"), in favor of WS Technologies
LLC, an Oregon limited liability company ("Assignee"), having its principal
office at 5300 Meadows Road, Suite 400, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035
("Assignee").





For good and valuable consideration,
receipt and sufficiency of which Assignor hereby acknowledges, Assignor hereby
irrevocably assigns, sells, quitclaims and transfers to Assignee all right,
title and interest in and to the Internet domain name "CarePayment.com" ("Domain
Name"), including all lower-level internet domain names for which the Domain
Name is a root or parent, whether in the form of an address for use in
electronic mail transfer, a Uniform Resource Locator or other form suitable for
specifying the location of an electronic data file over a distributed computer
network.





Within fifteen (15) days after the
Effective Date, Assignor will: (a) take whatever actions are necessary to
effectively transfer ownership of the Domain Name to Assignee, including,
without limitation, executing the agreements and documents required by the
Domain Name registrar, Tucows Inc.; and (b) provide Assignee or its authorized
agents with exclusive access to all accounts, user names and passwords issued by
Tucows Inc., that may be necessary to effectively manage the Domain
Name.





ASSIGNOR:CarePayment,
      LLCBy
      Aequitas Capital Management, Inc., its ManagerBy:
                      /s/ Robert J. JesenikRobert
      J. Jesenik,
President
Sacramento

River

T11N R3E T11N R4E

T10N R3E T10N R4E

SSUUTTTTEE RR CCOO

YYOOLL OO CC OO

18.2 L

18.45 L

36

25

31

6

30

0

5

7

35

26

8

1

12

Contract No. 14-06-200-1364X-R-1

Exhibit B

Lauppe, Burton and Kathryn

725-202-83

Note: The Public Land Survey depicted here

was digitized from USGS topographic maps.

0 0.5 1

Miles

Date: November 9, 2004

File Name: N:\districts\contracts\lauppe_burton_and_kathryn_1364\lauppe_burton_and_kathryn.mxd

Contractor's Service Area

Point of Diversion
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 507.44

 508.41

 508.29

 508.28

 508.18

 508.86

 508.87

 508.98

 508.62

 508.62

 508.76

 508.64

 508.68

 508.76

 508.64

 508.61

 508.60

 508.52

 508.50

 508.71

 508.66

 508.71

 508.39

 508.85

 508.75

 508.25

 508.84

 508.49

 508.62

 508.74

 63,810

 64,994

 64,846

 64,834

 64,711

 65,548

 65,560

 65,695

 65,252

 65,252

 65,425

 65,277

 65,326

 65,425

 65,277

 65,240

 65,228

 65,129

 65,105

 65,363

 65,301

 65,363

 64,969

 65,535

 65,412

 64,797

 65,523

 65,092

 65,252

 65,400

STORAGE

-1,344

+1,184

-148

-12

-123

+837

+12

+135

-443

+0

+173

-148

+49

+99

-148

-37

-12

-99

-24

+258

-62

+62

-394

+566

-123

-615

+726

-431

+160

+148

CHANGE

1,290

2,549

1,900

1,928

1,854

2,337

1,915

1,988

1,773

2,033

2,158

1,994

2,052

2,099

2,009

2,058

2,068

1,929

1,927

2,068

1,920

1,966

1,755

2,218

1,878

1,625

2,279

1,750

2,098

2,115

INFLOW

 1,778

 1,775

 1,777

 1,777

 1,777

 1,780

 1,779

 1,780

 1,778

 1,777

 1,781

 1,781

 1,779

 1,780

 1,788

 1,779

 1,778

 1,786

 1,778

 1,777

 1,778

 1,779

 1,776

 1,772

 1,780

 1,778

 1,777

 1,777

 1,779

 1,774

POWER

 99

 99

 100

 115

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 92

 178

 201

 201

 200

 115

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

 100

SPILL

 75

 66

 85

 29

 126

 118

 112

 125

 202

 242

 274

 270

 140

 75

 80

 81

 80

 64

 45

 43

 57

 42

 65

 51

 42

 40

 20

 73

 123

 150

OUTLET

 16

 12

 13

 13

 13

 17

 18

 15

 16

 14

 16

 18

 16

 16

 15

 16

 16

 14

 16

 18

 16

 14

 13

 10

 18

 17

 16

 17

 15

 16

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2002 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 07/12/2002

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +246 59,533 53,355 2,600 2,995 460

ACRE-FEET +246 118,084 105,830 5,157 5,941 912

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 105,830

SPILL 5,157 116,928

 65,154

OUTLET 5,941

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,968

 1,970

 1,952

 1,988

 1,909

 2,191

 1,829

 1,942

 1,783

 1,977

 2,231

 1,936

 2,055

 1,940

 1,953

 2,042

 2,046

 1,924

 1,938

 2,065

 1,943

 1,986

 1,777

 2,121

 1,922

 1,597

 1,958

 1,932

 2,175

 2,038

 59,088

 117,201

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934




For the month of   January, 2003

Commission File Number 333-7182-01


                                   CEZ, a. s.

      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)


                                c/o Duhova 2/1444
                                 140 53 Prague 4
                                 Czech Republic

      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                      Form 20-F  X     Form 40-F
                                ---              ---

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                Yes         No  X
                                    ---        ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________



<PAGE>


The following information was filed by CEZ, a. s., in Czech language with the
Prague Stock Exchange as required by its rules and regulations:

Pursuant to an extract from the shareholders' ledger of CEZ, a. s. the only
shareholder with a shareholding in excess of 3% as of December 31, 2002 is the
National Property Fund of the Czech Republic. Its holding amounts to 67.606% of
the company's registered capital.



<PAGE>

                                   Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                                        CEZ, a. s.

                                                 ------------------------
                                                      (Registrant)

Date: January 21, 2003

                                               By:
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                        Libuse Latalova
                                                Head of Finance Administration
#### § 1823.13 Is additional documentation needed when a third party requests a refund?

Yes. When refund requests are made by heirs, executors, administrators, assignees, or mortgagees, BLM may require additional documentation sufficient to establish your entitlement to a refund. If you are an heir, executor, administrator, assignee or mortgagee, you should contact the BLM office where you will file your refund application for information regarding appropriate documentation.
### §393. Leases of restricted allotments

The restricted allotment of any Indian may be leased for farming and grazing purposes by the allottee or his heirs, subject only to the approval of the superintendent or other officer in charge of the reservation where the land is located, under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe: Provided, That this provision shall not apply to the Five Civilized Tribes.

(Mar. 3, 1921, ch. 119, 41 Stat. 1232.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard J. Braun, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)                      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)                      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Dated:   July 29, 2010
By:   /s/ Richard J. BraunRichard J. Braun

Chief Executive Officer
#### § 2544.2 Appraisal of land.

When an application is received it will be assigned for investigation and appraisement of the land in accordance with the provisions of the act.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Stephan Kuppenheimer, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


Date: March 27, 2006                              /s/ Stephan Kuppenheimer
                                                  ------------------------
                                                  President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 354

 380

 405

 441

 445

 478

 466

 467

 474

 479

 497

 500

 505

 508

 535

 579

 583

 605

 622

 621

 535

 529

 476

 431

 375

 357

 346

 426

 446

 449

 330

 339

 347

 397

 414

 434

 422

 428

 439

 436

 448

 462

 468

 472

 503

 514

 531

 538

 559

 503

 497

 453

 434

 376

 328

 332

 328

 347

 405

 406

 342

 361

 377

 418

 430

 456

 447

 445

 454

 462

 468

 483

 490

 494

 521

 545

 558

 565

 599

 561

 514

 493

 458

 399

 348

 344

 338

 384

 430

 427

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 29, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 9,092

 9,123

 9,158

 9,231

 9,337

 9,477

 9,606

 9,726

 9,879

 10,067

 10,272

 10,492

 10,729

 10,958

 11,216

 11,492

 11,773

 12,045

 12,363

 12,660

 12,906

 13,111

 13,274

 13,353

 13,386

 13,410

 13,407

 13,446

 13,527

 13,611

 303

 304

 305

 308

 311

 316

 320

 324

 329

 336

 342

 350

 358

 365

 374

 383

 392

 402

 412

 422

 430

 437

 442

 445

 446

 447

 447

 448

 451

 454

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §44. Employment of Indians

In the Indian Service Indians shall be employed as herders, teamsters, and laborers, and where practicable in all other employments in connection with the agencies and the Indian Service. And it shall be the duty of the Secretary of the Interior and the Commissioner of Indian Affairs to enforce this provision.

(Aug. 15, 1894, ch. 290, §10, 28 Stat. 313.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6138

OLADAYO OLADOKUN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-97-3957-AW)

Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 9, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oladayo Oladokun, Appellant Pro Se. Ranganath Manthripragada,

Assistant United States Attorney, Jan Paul Miller, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States

v. Oladokun, No. CA-97-3957-AW (D. Md. Jan. 5, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §47a. Security required by Secretary; contracts with Indian-owned economic enterprise; public work

The Secretary, in his discretion, may require security other than bonds required by sections 3131 and 3133 of title 40 when entering into a contract with an Indian-owned economic enterprise pursuant to the provisions of the Act of June 25, 1910 (25 U.S.C. 47), for the construction, alteration, or repair of any public work of the United States: Provided, That, the alternative form of security provides the United States with adequate security for performance and payment.

(Pub. L. 98–449, §11, Oct. 4, 1984, 98 Stat. 1726.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Sections 3131 and 3133 of title 40" substituted in text for "the Miller Act (40 U.S.C. 270a)" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, the first section of which enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.
§ 3427.0-7 Scope. The surface owner consent provisions of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act do not apply: ( a ) To preference right lease applications; and
( b ) If the split estate coal is to be mined by underground mining techniques (43 CFR 3500.0-5).
### §3804. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this chapter. Funds provided under this chapter are to be considered nonreimbursable.

(Pub. L. 103–302, §5, Aug. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 1563.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6860

PETERS CHIBUEZE UKANDU,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and its Agents,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CA-98-364-AM)

Submitted: November 17, 1998 Decided: December 15, 1998

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peters Chibueze Ukandu, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Dean Kromberg,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Peters Chibueze Ukandu appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment for the Government in this action to

recover forfeited property. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ukandu v.

United States Dep’t of Justice, No. CA-98-364-AM (E.D. Va., filed

May 11, 1998; entered May 13, 1998; see Fed.R.Civ.P. 58, 79(a)). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 2806.54 Rent for energy storage facilities that are not part of a solar or wind energy development facility.

Rent for energy storage facilities that are not part of a solar or wind energy development facility will be determined pursuant to the linear rent formula set forth in § 2806.23. The BLM may determine your rent pursuant to § 2806.70 if we determine the linear rent schedule does not apply.

[89 FR 35682, May 1, 2024]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 525

 556

 576

 591

 546

 517

 525

 537

 484

 531

 476

 452

 442

 416

 408

 404

 394

 380

 391

 375

 384

 385

 387

 371

 379

 371

 355

 392

 343

 372

 324

 396

 397

 401

 413

 427

 432

 427

 424

 418

 411

 405

 397

 382

 366

 351

 342

 340

 343

 338

 339

 337

 333

 320

 316

 301

 307

 307

 304

 294

 286

 282

 425

 431

 441

 452

 452

 456

 450

 451

 438

 436

 425

 412

 398

 384

 369

 362

 356

 357

 356

 350

 349

 348

 339

 331

 327

 320

 320

 319

 310

 307

 298

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER