alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1 Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries Certification Of Chief Executive Officer PURSUANT TO RULE 13a  14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Rodney M. Tiede, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Broadcast International, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c.      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date: November 13, 2007  /s/ Rodney M. Tiede Rodney M. Tiede Chief Executive Officer
#### § 3422.3-3 Unsurveyed lands.

If the land is unsurveyed, the successful bidder shall not be given notice to comply with the requirements of § 3422.4 of this title for lease issuance until the land has been surveyed as provided in § 3471.1-2 of this title.
Motion Granted; Order filed October 13, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00034-CV

NO. 14-11-00127-CV

____________

RAHUL K. NATH, M.D., Appellant

V.

BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND TEXAS CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2006-10826 & 2006-10826-A

O R D E R

On October 7, 2011, appellees in case numbers 14-11-00034-CV and 

14-11-00127-CV filed a motion to consolidate two appeals from sanction orders issued in 

the same litigation. The motion to consolidate is GRANTED. We order the appeals 

pending under our appellate case numbers 14-11-00034-CV and 14-11-00127-CV 

CONSOLIDATED. 

We GRANT appellees’ request for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellees’ 

brief in the consolidated appeals shall be due on or before November 18, 2011. 

PER CURIAM
RICHARD LEROY DOUGLAS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3322

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela Cox, Judge.

Richard Leroy Douglas, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 3200.7 What regulations apply to geothermal leases issued before August 8, 2005? ( a ) *General applicability.* ( 1 ) Leases issued before August 8, 2005, are subject to this part and part 3280, except that such leases are subject to the BLM regulations in effect on August 8, 2005 (43 CFR parts 3200 and 3280 (2004)), with regard to regulatory provisions relating to royalties, minimum royalties, rentals, primary term and lease extensions, diligence and annual work requirements, and renewals.
( 2 ) The lessee of a lease issued before August 8, 2005, may elect to be subject to all of the regulations in this part and part 3280, without regard to the exceptions in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Such an election must occur no later than December 1, 2008. Any such election as it pertains to lease terms relating to royalty rates must be made under the royalty rate conversion provisions of subpart 3212. A lessee must obtain a royalty conversion under subpart 3212 to make an election under this paragraph effective.
( b ) *Royalty rate conversion and production incentives.* The lessee of a lease issued before August 8, 2005, may: ( 1 ) Choose to convert lease terms relating to royalty rates under subpart 3212; or
( 2 ) If it does not convert lease terms relating to royalty rates, apply for a production incentive under subpart 3212 (if eligible under that subpart).
( c ) *Two year extension.* The lessee of a lease issued before August 8, 2005, may apply to extend a lease that was within 2 years of the end of its term on August 8, 2005, for up to 2 years to allow achievement of production under the lease or to allow the lease to be included in a producing unit.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.

This certification is provided
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the
Issuer).

I, Keith S. Hynes, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer certify that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: February 16, 2007



/s/    KEITH S. HYNESName:    Keith S. Hynes
§ 3173.28 Instances not constituting off-lease measurement, for which no approval is required. ( a ) If the approved FMP is located on the well pad of a directionally or horizontally drilled well that produces oil and gas from a lease, unit, or communitized area on which the well pad is not located, measurement at the FMP does not constitute off-lease measurement. However, if the FMP is located off of the well pad, regardless of distance, measurement at the FMP constitutes off-lease measurement, and BLM approval is required under §§ 3173.22 through 3173.26.
( b ) If a lease, unit, or CA consists of more than one separate tract whose boundaries are not contiguous (*e.g.,* a single lease comprises two or more separate tracts), measurement of production at an FMP located on one of the tracts is not considered to be off-lease measurement if: ( 1 ) The production is moved from one tract within the same lease, unit, or communitized area to another area of the lease, unit, or communitized area on which the FMP is located; and
( 2 ) Production is not diverted during the movement between the tracts before the FMP, except for production used royalty free.
§ 34.11 Enforcement sanctions. The provisions of section 17, the President's *Decision,* and implementing rules, regulations, and orders, as appropriate, will be enforced through: ( a ) The issuance of a compliance order by the Federal Inspector pursuant to section 11 of ANGTA; or
( b ) The commencement of a civil action for appropriate relief, including a permanent or temporary injunction, or a civil penalty not to exceed $25,000 per day; or
( c ) By any other means authorized by law.
**EXHIBIT24.0**

**POWER OFATTORNEY**

Each person whosesignature appears below hereby authorizes Jack C. Wauchope and Karan C. Pohl asattorney-in-fact, to sign in his or her behalf, individually and in eachcapacity stated below, and to file this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and allamendments and/or supplements to this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.
| /s/ Jack C. Wauchope      | ,      | Director, President, and    |   | March 30, 2007 |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|----------------|
| Jack C. Wauchope          |   | Principal Executive Officer |   |           |
|                      |   |                        |   |           |
| /s/ Marilyn M.  Britton   | ,      | Director                    |   | March 30, 2007 |
| Marilyn M.  Britton       |   |                        |   |           |
|                      |   |                        |   |           |
| /s/ Dario A.  Domenghini  | ,      | Director                    |   | March 30, 2007 |
| Dario A.  Domenghini      |   |                        |   |           |
|                      |   |                        |   |           |
| /s/ James M.  Kaney       | ,      | Director                    |   | March 30, 2007 |
| James M. Kaney            |   |                        |   |           |
|                      |   |                        |   |           |
|  /s/ Michael A. Lady | ,      | Director                    |   | March 30, 2007 |
| Michael A. Lady           |   |                        |   |           |
|                      |   |                        |   |           |
|  /s/ Gene D. Mintz   | ,      | Director                    |   | March 30, 2007 |
| Gene D. Mintz             |   |                        |   |           |
|                      |   |                        |   |           |
| /s/ Ronald R.  Olson      | ,      | Director                    |   | March 30, 2007 |
| Ronald. R. Olson          |   |                        |   |           |
|                      |   |                        |   |           |
| /s/ Jack W.  Robasciotti  | ,      | Director                    |   | March 30, 2007 |
| Jack W.  Robasciotti      |   |                        |   |           |
|                      |   |                        |   |           |
| /s/ Dan H. Wixom          | ,      | Director                    |   | March 30, 2007 |
| Dan H. Wixom              |   |                        |   |           |
|                      |   |                        |   |           |
| /s/ Karan C.  Pohl        | ,      | Principal Financial Officer |   | March 30, 2007 |
| Karan C. Pohl             |   |                        |   |           |

 

----
§ 3255.13 How will BLM treat Indian information submitted under the Indian Mineral Development Act? Under the Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982 (IMDA) (25 U.S.C. 2101 *et seq.*), the Department of the Interior will hold as privileged proprietary information of the affected Indian or Indian tribe: ( a ) All findings forming the basis of the Secretary's intent to approve or disapprove any Minerals Agreement under IMDA; and
( b ) All projections, studies, data, or other information concerning a Minerals Agreement under IMDA, regardless of the date received, related to: ( 1 ) The terms, conditions, or financial return to the Indian parties;
( 2 ) The extent, nature, value, or disposition of the Indian mineral resources; or
( 3 ) The production, products, or proceeds thereof.
### §463. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 463 was editorially reclassified as section 5103 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Restoration of Vacant and Undisposed-of Ceded Lands in Certain Indian Reservations

Pub. L. 85–420, May 19, 1958, 72 Stat. 121, which provided that lands classified as vacant and undisposed-of ceded lands (including townsite lots) on the Indian reservations at Klamath River, California, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, Crow, Montana, Fort Peck, Montana, and Spokane, Washington, would be restored to tribal ownership, subject to valid existing rights, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4537 

To prohibit the use of military installations to house aliens who do not 

have a lawful immigration status or are undergoing removal proceedings 

in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2016 

Mr. CARTER of Texas (for himself, Mrs. ROBY, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. 

FARENTHOLD, Mr. BABIN, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. MEADOWS, Ms. 

GRANGER, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. BARTON, Mr. ZINKE, 

Mr. CALVERT, Mr. COOK, Mr. BOST, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mrs. 

LUMMIS, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. STIVERS, 

Mr. MCCAUL, Mrs. NOEM, Mr. FORBES, Mr. PALMER, Mr. ROGERS of 

Alabama, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, Mr. MARINO, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. 

DONOVAN, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. COLE, Mr. AMODEI, Mr. 

SMITH of Texas, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. OLSON, Mr. 

BARLETTA, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. 

RATCLIFFE, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. 

HUELSKAMP, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. 

SCHWEIKERT, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. FLORES, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. POSEY, and Mr. PALAZZO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of military installations to house aliens 

who do not have a lawful immigration status or are 

undergoing removal proceedings in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4537 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Resist Executive Am3 nesty on Defense Installations Act’’ or the ‘‘READI Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF MILITARY INSTALLA5 TIONS TO HOUSE ALIENS WHO DO NOT HAVE 

6 A LAWFUL IMMIGRATION STATUS OR ARE UN7 DERGOING REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE 

8 UNITED STATES. 

9 (a) PROHIBITION.—A military installation may not 

10 be used to house any alien unlawfully present in the 

11 United States. 

12 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

13 (1) The term ‘‘alien unlawfully present’’ means 

14 an alien who— 

15 (A) is covered by the rule of construction 

16 regarding unlawful presence contained in sec17 tion 212(a)(9)(B)(ii) of the Immigration and 

18 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(ii)); or 

19 (B) is undergoing removal proceedings in 

20 the United States. 

21 (2) The term ‘‘military installation’’ has the 

22 meaning given that term in section 2801(c)(4) of 

23 title 10, United States Code, but does not include an 

24 installation located outside of the United States. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 502

 514

 485

 491

 485

 490

 478

 475

 459

 463

 456

 455

 456

 452

 442

 443

 446

 445

 447

 456

 445

 451

 461

 479

 488

 506

 524

 544

 542

 545

 446

 440

 441

 444

 450

 453

 453

 412

 394

 442

 436

 433

 427

 424

 422

 423

 421

 422

 423

 424

 428

 430

 437

 447

 462

 478

 495

 504

 524

 508

 465

 460

 453

 455

 458

 461

 460

 448

 441

 448

 444

 440

 437

 434

 430

 430

 430

 431

 430

 434

 433

 438

 449

 462

 477

 494

 509

 524

 530

 531

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

            REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16
                OR 15D-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                           For the month of June, 2002

                               Durango Corporation
                 (f/k/a Grupo Industrial Durango, S.A. de C.V.)
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                     Torre Corporativa Durango, Potasio 150,
                    Cd. Industrial Durango, Durango, Mexico
                    ----------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F [X] Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes [ ] No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-_____________.
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                           CORPORACION DURANGO, S.A. DE C.V.

Date:  June 7, 2002        By /s/Mayela de la Paz Rincon Arredondo de Velasco
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Name:  Mayela de la Paz Rincon Arredondo de Velasco
                             Title: Chief Financial Officer


                                      -2-
(No. 22

Claimant awarded $30.50.)

#### Blake Grover, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 17, 1924.*

*Services*— when *claim for, allowed.*Where services have been faithfully performed’, in good faith, under belief that compensation will be paid therefor, the court will enter an award in favor of claimant for such services.

Blake Grover, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General; Floyd E. Britton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim filed to recover Thirty Dollars and Fifty Cents ($30.50) for services rendered to the State for issuing 122 crow foot bar licenses for the Division of Fish and Game of the Department of Agriculture of the State of Illinois, from November 21, 1920, until November-21, 1921, collecting from the several licenses the total sum of $305.00.

It appears from the record that the claimant received no compensation for this service, either dir.ectly on, indirectly.

It is further, however, the opinion of the court that as a matter of law that the claimant could not recover, but it is the opinion of the court that the claimant performed the service faithfully and made return of the funds collected by him without malting any deduction for his services, in good faith and with the belief that he would be compensated.

Therefore, it is the opinion of the court that under these circumstances and from evidence offered in open court that as a matter of equity and good conscience this claim should be allowed, and it is recommended that the claimant be allowed the sum of $30.50.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10528

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RONALD LEE WILLIAMS, JR

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CR-194-ALL

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ronald Lee Williams, Jr.

presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown,

920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), which held that a district court may

order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state

sentence. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and

the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 5, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10528

2
### §462. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 462 was editorially reclassified as section 5102 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul G. Laird,  Chief Executive  Officer,  and I, Les Bates,  Chief Financial
Officer, of New Frontier Energy, Inc. (the "Company") certify that:

1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of New Frontier Energy,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this annual report fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

Date: June 4, 2008
                                   /s/ Paul G. Laird
                                   --------------------------------------
                                   Paul G. Laird, Chief Executive Officer


                                  /s/ Les Bates
                                   --------------------------------------
                                   Les Bates, Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>