alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM 6-K


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C.  20549





REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER





Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





For the month of June, 2010





Commission File Number:  0-30852





GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.





Galicia Financial Group S.A.


(Translation of registrant’s name into English)





Tte. Gral. Juan D. Perón 456


(C1038AAJ)  Buenos Aires, Argentina


(Address of principal executive offices)




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
  Form 20-F  xForm 40-F  o
  Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to
 Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  o x
  If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________


FORM 6-K




Commission File No. 0-30852




Month Filed
Event and Summary
Exhibit No.June, 2010
Notice of Material Event, dated June 7, 2010, regarding the issuance of Class II, Series II and Class II, Series III Negotiable Obligations by the Registrant.
99.1







SIGNATURES
  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.

(Registrant)Date: June 8, 2010
By:
/s/Pedro Alberto RichardsName:  Pedro Alberto RichardsTitle:    General Manager
#### § 725.478 Filing and service of decision and order.

On the date of issuance of a decision and order under § 725.477, the administrative law judge shall serve the decision and order on all parties to the claim by certified mail. On the same date, the original record of the claim shall be sent to the DCMWC in Washington, D.C. Upon receipt by the DCMWC, the decision and order shall be considered to be filed in the office of the district director, and shall become effective on that date.
**Updated Interim Status Report – November 2001**

Interim Contracts 2002-2004 FWS Supplemental Information
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 505.94

 506.21

 506.13

 505.79

 506.52

 506.94

 506.97

 506.87

 507.35

 507.41

 507.50

 507.45

 507.85

 507.88

 507.24

 508.16

 507.59

 507.56

 507.52

 508.05

 508.25

 509.08

 508.61

 507.57

 507.58

 506.58

 506.48

 507.94

 508.93

 508.61

 508.13

 62,012

 62,334

 62,238

 61,836

 62,704

 63,205

 63,241

 63,122

 63,701

 63,774

 63,883

 63,822

 64,307

 64,344

 63,568

 64,686

 63,992

 63,956

 63,907

 64,551

 64,797

 65,820

 65,240

 63,968

 63,980

 62,776

 62,656

 64,416

 65,634

 65,240

 64,649

STORAGE

+435

+322

-96

-402

+868

+501

+36

-119

+579

+73

+109

-61

+485

+37

-776

+1,118

-694

-36

-49

+644

+246

+1,023

-580

-1,272

+12

-1,204

-120

+1,760

+1,218

-394

-591

CHANGE

4,366

4,308

4,160

4,081

4,758

4,458

4,199

4,063

4,428

4,209

4,298

3,665

3,004

2,181

1,682

2,502

1,448

1,798

1,679

2,013

1,757

2,110

1,298

981

1,668

979

1,522

2,448

2,220

1,478

1,479

INFLOW

 2,465

 2,473

 2,472

 2,460

 2,463

 2,466

 2,467

 2,465

 2,469

 2,471

 2,467

 2,468

 2,436

 2,147

 2,063

 1,922

 1,791

 1,805

 1,691

 1,675

 1,620

 1,571

 1,573

 1,612

 1,648

 1,572

 1,568

 1,557

 1,596

 1,559

 1,691

POWER

 1,594

 1,605

 1,650

 1,722

 1,752

 1,621

 1,603

 1,599

 1,606

 1,660

 1,684

 1,104

 248

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 100

 70

SPILL

 75

 51

 76

 85

 90

 110

 107

 57

 54

 32

 82

 100

 56

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5

 1

OUTLET

 13

 17

 10

 17

 15

 8

 4

 2

 7

 9

 10

 24

 19

 15

 10

 16

 7

 11

 13

 13

 13

 23

 17

 10

 14

 14

 14

 4

 10

 13

 15

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2013 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 06/01/2013

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +3,072 85,240 62,703 19,618 981 387

ACRE-FEET +3,072 169,074 124,371 38,912 1,946 768

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 124,371

SPILL 38,912 165,229

 61,577

OUTLET 1,946

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 4,268

 4,195

 3,919

 3,962

 4,652

 4,234

 4,057

 3,994

 4,297

 4,116

 4,207

 3,625

 3,000

 2,179

 1,720

 2,465

 1,475

 1,805

 1,680

 2,008

 1,734

 2,095

 1,279

 1,002

 1,663

 997

 1,513

 2,424

 2,208

 1,469

 1,493

 83,735

 166,088

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theannual report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark A. Herpich,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

                (1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

              (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

| /s/ Mark A. Herpich     |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Mark A. Herpich         |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| March 27, 2009     |   |   |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 408

 408

 424

 408

 401

 406

 408

 407

 403

 407

 408

 406

 399

 398

 393

 389

 383

 396

 395

 396

 393

 384

 381

 388

 388

 384

 381

 382

 379

 389

 396

 363

 381

 383

 384

 383

 383

 379

 378

 378

 367

 367

 370

 367

 366

 366

 365

 337

 363

 353

 363

 361

 359

 357

 356

 357

 355

 355

 348

 344

 354

 354

 391

 391

 394

 394

 391

 391

 391

 389

 389

 385

 384

 384

 381

 378

 376

 374

 371

 374

 376

 377

 372

 367

 367

 368

 368

 367

 366

 364

 359

 365

 366

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
§ 2.282 How can I obtain employee testimony or Department records? ( a ) To obtain employee testimony, you must submit: ( 1 ) A written request (hereafter a “*Touhy* Request;” *see* § 2.84 and *United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951)); and
( 2 ) A statement that you will submit a check for costs to the Department of the Interior, in accordance with § 2.85, if your *Touhy* Request is granted.
( b ) To obtain official Department records, you must submit: ( 1 ) A *Touhy* Request; and
( 2 ) A Statement that you agree to pay the costs of duplication in accordance with 43 CFR part 2, appendix A, if your *Touhy* Request is granted.
( c ) You must send your *Touhy* Request to: ( 1 ) The employee's office address;
( 2 ) The official in charge of the employee's bureau, division, office or agency; and
( 3 ) The appropriate unit of the Solicitor's Office.
( d ) To obtain employee testimony or records of the Office of Inspector General, you must send your *Touhy* Request to the General Counsel for the Office of Inspector General.
( e ) 43 CFR part 2, appendix B contains a list of the addresses of the Department's bureaus and offices and the units of the Solicitor's Office. The General Counsel for the Inspector General is located at the address for the Office of the Inspector General. If you do not know the employee's address, you may obtain it from the employee's bureau or office.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1042

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Kenneth Dean Becker

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

 ____________

 Submitted: December 12, 2022

Filed: December 27, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Dean Becker entered a conditional guilty plea for conspiracy to

distribute and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He reserved the
right to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress. We affirm the judgment of the

district court.1

Officers executed a search warrant at Becker’s residence. Becker argues there

was a lack of probable cause, officers violated procedural requirements under

Nebraska law, and statements he made after the arrest were fruits of a poisonous tree. 

We review factual findings on the denial of motion to suppress for clear error and

legal conclusions de novo. United States v. Thurmond, 782 F.3d 1042, 1044 (8th Cir.

2015).

Probable cause for the search warrant existed. A cooperating witness told

police that drug activity was occurring at a residence in Omaha. Investigators

monitored a controlled buy between the cooperating witness and an individual at the

residence. The evidence from the monitoring of the controlled buy demonstrated “a

fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime” was in the residence. Id. 

Although the affidavit did not specify the cooperating witness’s background, the buy

was recorded with video and audio making the credibility issue largely immaterial. 

Next, even if a technical violation of Nebraska law occurred when signing the

warrant that is not a basis for suppressing the evidence. United States v. Howard, 532

F.3d 755, 760 (8th Cir. 2008) (the Fourth Amendment, not state law, determines the

admissibility of a search offered in a federal prosecution).2

We affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

1The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska. 

2The pro se motion to amend the record is denied on the same grounds.

-2-
#### Burton C. Hoffman, Respondent, v. Sidney G. Phillips et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — 'Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
#### § 3179.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to implement and carry out the purposes of statutes relating to prevention of waste from Federal and Indian (other than The Osage Nation) oil and gas leases, protection of worker safety, conservation of surface resources, and management of the public lands for multiple use and sustained yield. This subpart supersedes those portions of Notice to Lessees and Operators of Onshore Federal and Indian Oil and Gas Leases, Royalty or Compensation for Oil and Gas Lost (NTL-4A) pertaining to, among other things, flaring and venting of produced gas, unavoidably and avoidably lost gas, and waste prevention.
§ 30.507 How will trust personalty be distributed if decedent died intestate on or after June 20, 2006, and the Act does not specify how the trust personalty should be distributed? When the judge determines that a decedent died intestate on or after June 20, 2006, without a surviving spouse or eligible heirs under the Act, and without trust or restricted land over which one, and only one, Indian Tribe has jurisdiction, the judge will direct distribution of trust personalty, including trust funds that were on deposit in the decedent's IIM account or owing to the decedent as of the decedent's date of death, as follows: ( a ) To the decedent's surviving children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, parents, or siblings who are not eligible heirs under the Act, in the order set forth in 25 U.S.C. 2206(a)(2)(B).
( b ) If trust personalty does not descend under paragraph (a) of this section, then to the decedent's surviving nieces and nephews, in equal shares.
( c ) If trust personalty does not descend under paragraph (b) of this section, then to the Indian Tribe in which the decedent was enrolled at the time the decedent died.
( d ) If trust personalty does not descend under paragraph (c) of this section, then: ( 1 ) To the Indian Tribe in which the decedent's biological parents were enrolled, if both were enrolled in the same Tribe;
( 2 ) To the Indian Tribes in which the decedent's biological parents were enrolled, in equal shares, if each of the decedent's biological parents was enrolled in a different Tribe; or
( 3 ) If only one biological parent was enrolled in an Indian Tribe, to the Indian Tribe in which that biological parent was enrolled.
( e ) If trust personalty does not descend under paragraph (d) of this section, then: ( 1 ) To the Indian Tribe in which the decedent's biological grandparents were enrolled; if all enrolled biological grandparents were enrolled in the same Tribe;
( 2 ) To the Indian Tribes in which the decedent's biological grandparents were enrolled, in equal shares, if two or more of the decedent's biological grandparents were enrolled in different Tribes; or
( 3 ) If only one biological grandparent was enrolled in an Indian Tribe, to the Indian Tribe in which that biological grandparent was enrolled.
( f ) If trust personalty does not descend under paragraph (e) of this section, then to an Indian Tribe selected by the judge, in consideration of the following factors: ( 1 ) The origin of the funds in the decedent's IIM account;
( 2 ) The Tribal designator contained in the owner identification number or IIM account number assigned to the decedent by BIA; and
( 3 ) The geographic origin of the decedent's Indian ancestors.
[86 FR 72094, Dec. 20, 2021]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 14, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133154 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133154 COA: 274819 Wayne CC: 05-001492-01 ERNEST GRAY JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 14, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The denial is without prejudice to th e defendant’s right to file a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to MCR 6.500 et seq . Moreover, if defen dant chooses to file such a motion, the trial court, and not the Atto rney Grievance Commission, woul d be the appropriate forum to conduct an evidentiary h earing regarding defe ndant’s claim that his counsel had a conflict of interest, should it determine th at an evidentiary hearing is required.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would remand this case to the trial court for treatment of the defendant's motions as a motion fo r relief from judgment pursuant to MCR 6.500 et seq . and, if necessary, for an evidentiary hearing regarding the defendant’s claim that his counsel had a conflict of interest.

p0911 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 14, 2007

Clerk
§ 3216.15 When must I file my transfer request? ( a ) File a request to transfer record title or operating rights within 90 days after you sign an agreement with the transferee. If BLM receives your request more than 90 days after signing, we may require you to re-certify that you still intend to complete the transfer.
( b ) There is no specific time deadline for filing estate transfers, corporate mergers, and name changes. File them within a reasonable time.
#### § 3273.25 When may I relinquish my site license?

You may request approval to relinquish your site license by sending BLM a written notice requesting relinquishment review and approval. We will not approve the relinquishment until you comply with § 3273.21.
§ 703.212 Required reports; examination of insurance carrier accounts. ( a ) Upon the Office's request, each insurance carrier must submit the following reports: ( 1 ) A certified financial statement of the carrier's assets and liabilities, or a balance sheet.
( 2 ) A sworn statement showing the extent of the carrier's unsecured LHWCA obligations for each State in which it is authorized to write insurance under the LHWCA or any of its extensions.
( 3 ) A sworn statement reporting the carrier's open cases as of the date of such report, listing by State all death and injury cases, together with a report of the status of all outstanding claims.
( b ) Whenever it considers necessary, the Office may inspect or examine a carrier's books of account, records, and other papers to verify any financial statement or other information the carrier furnished to the Office in any statement or report required by this section, or any other section of the regulations in this part. The carrier must permit the Office or its duly authorized representative to make the inspection or examination. Alternatively, the Office may accept an adequate independent audit by a certified public accountant.
§ 3137.22 What are the size and shape requirements for a unit area? ( a ) The unit area must— ( 1 ) Consist of tracts, each of which must be contiguous to at least one other tract in the unit, that are located so that you can perform operations and production in an efficient and logical manner; and
( 2 ) Include at least one NPR-A lease.
( b ) BLM may limit the size and shape of the unit considering the type, amount and rate of the proposed development and production and the location of the oil or gas.
**EXHIBIT
      23**





Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




Callisto
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


New
      York,
      New York





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-119648 and 333-130716) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-128254, 333-115471
      and 333-123863) of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report
      dated March 29, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements which
      appear in this Form 10-K/A. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph
      regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.





/s/
      BDO
      Seidman, LLP





BDO
      Seidman, LLP


New
      York,
      NY





April
      13,
      2006
§ 3283.6 What is the purpose of BLM's periodic review? ( a ) BLM must review all unit agreements to determine whether any leases, or portions of leases, committed to any unit are no longer reasonably necessary for unit operations, and eliminate from inclusion in the unit agreement any such lands it determines not reasonably necessary for unit operations.
( b ) The elimination will be based on scientific evidence, and occur only for the purpose of conserving and properly managing the geothermal resources.
( c ) BLM will not eliminate any lands from a unit until BLM provides the unit operator, the lessee, and any other person with a legal interest in such lands, with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment.
( d ) Any lands eliminated from a unit under this section are eligible for a lease extension under subpart 3207 of part 3200 of this chapter if the lands meet the requirements for the extension.
---

|Maddox Ungar Silberstein, PLLC CPAs
      and Business Advisors
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|Phone (248) 203-0080                                           
|Fax (248) 281-0940                                             
|30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175                               
|Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586                                   
|www.maddoxungar.com                                            

December 3, 2008

To the Board of Directors of Geocom Resources Inc.
Bellingham, Washington

To Whom It May Concern:

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111251) of Geocom Resources Inc. of
our report dated November 29, 2008, relating to the financial statements of
Geocom Resources Inc. which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

Sincerely,

/s/ Maddox Ungar Silberstein, PLLC

Maddox Ungar Silberstein, PLLC

---
§ 2866.32 How does the BLM determine the population strata served for your facility? ( a ) The BLM determines the population strata served as follows: ( 1 ) If the site or facility is within a designated RMA, the BLM will use the population strata of the RMA;
( 2 ) If the site or facility is within a designated RMA, and it serves two or more RMAs, the BLM will use the population strata of the RMA having the greatest population;
( 3 ) If the site or facility is outside an RMA, and it serves one or more RMAs, the BLM will use the population strata of the RMA served having the greatest population;
( 4 ) If the site or facility is outside an RMA and the site does not serve an RMA, the BLM will use the population strata of the community it serves having the greatest population, as identified in the current edition of the Rand McNally Road Atlas; or
( 5 ) If the site or facility is outside an RMA, and it serves a community of less than 25,000, the BLM will use the lowest population strata shown on the rent schedule.
( b ) ( 1 ) The BLM considers all facilities (and all uses within the same facility) located at one site to serve the same RMA or community. However, at its discretion, the BLM may make case-by-case exceptions in determining the population served at a particular site by uses not located within the same facility and not authorized under the same grant. For example, when a site has a mix of high-power and low-power uses that are authorized by separate grants, and only the high-power uses are capable of serving an RMA or community with the greatest population, the BLM may separately determine the population strata served by the low-power uses (if not collocated in the same facility with the high-power uses), and calculate the rent as described in § 2866.30.
( 2 ) For purposes of rent calculation, all uses within the same facility and/or authorized under the same grant must serve the same population strata.
( 3 ) For purposes of rent calculation, the BLM will not modify the population rankings published in the Rand McNally Commercial Atlas and Marketing Guide or the population of the community served.
### §711f. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 95–195, §8, Nov. 18, 1977, 91 Stat. 1419, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to make rules and regulations necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.