alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                      CHASE BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                          Chase Auto Owner Trust 2005-A

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Bank USA,
National Association ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and
Servicing Agreement dated as of May 26, 2005 (the "Sale and Servicing
Agreement") by and between Chase USA and Chase Auto Owner Trust 2005-A, as
issuer (the "Issuer"), does hereby certify that:

      1.    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
            May 26, 2005 until December 31, 2005 was conducted under my
            supervision.

      2.    Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
            fully performed in all material respects all its obligations under
            the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such period and no
            material default in the performance of such obligations has occurred
            or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 3 below.

      3.    None.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
certificate this 29th day of March 2006.


                                        /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                                        ----------------------
                                        Richard J. Naeder
                                        Authorized Signatory
#### § 3192.4 What is the term of a cooperative agreement?

Cooperative agreements can be in effect for a period from 1 to 5 years from the effective date of the agreement, as set out in the agreement.
#### Bernard Fillgrave, Respondent, *v.*Edward D. Chappell, Appellant.

(Argued June 3, 1878;

decided June 11, 1878.)

*Edward H. Hobbs*for appellant.

*Thomas E. Pearsall*for respondent.

*608Agree to affirm. No opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 3262.13 May BLM require me to follow a well spacing program? BLM may require you to follow a well spacing program if we determine that it is necessary for proper development. If we require well spacing, we will consider the following factors when we set well spacing: ( a ) Hydrologic, geologic, and reservoir characteristics of the field, minimizing well interference;
( b ) Topography;
( c ) Interference with multiple use of the land; and
( d ) Environmental protection, including ground water.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,200.73

 1,200.50

 1,199.72

 1,199.22

 1,198.70

 1,198.43

 1,198.61

 1,198.75

 1,198.87

 1,198.57

 1,198.67

 1,198.72

 1,198.90

 1,198.70

 1,198.83

 1,198.74

 1,198.56

 1,198.49

 1,198.74

 1,198.47

 1,198.72

 1,198.42

 1,198.45

 1,198.34

 1,198.49

 1,198.70

 1,199.19

 1,199.84

 212.3

 211.6

 209.3

 207.8

 206.3

 205.5

 206.0

 206.4

 206.8

 205.9

 206.2

 206.3

 206.9

 206.3

 206.7

 206.4

 205.9

 205.7

 206.4

 205.6

 206.3

 205.4

 205.5

 205.2

 205.7

 206.3

 207.7

 209.7

STORAGE

+0.7

-0.7

-2.3

-1.5

-1.5

-0.8

+0.5

+0.4

+0.4

-0.9

+0.3

+0.1

+0.5

-0.6

+0.4

-0.3

-0.5

-0.2

+0.7

-0.8

+0.7

-0.9

+0.1

-0.3

+0.4

+0.6

+1.4

+1.9

CHANGE

852

701

634

590

537

468

486

426

395

363

372

359

481

437

407

411

398

466

585

1,057

987

832

724

635

576

529

1,274

1,935

INFLOW

 269

 844

 1,603

 1,135

 1,108

 669

 14

 14

 14

 607

 14

 85

 14

 534

 14

 345

 465

 366

 14

 1,258

 416

 1,071

 474

 593

 150

 14

 341

 761

PP

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

OUTLETS

 5

 4

 5

 4

 4

 0

 5

 4

 3

 2

 9

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4

 0

 0

 0

 7

 5

 5

 3

 3

 3

 0

C.F.S.

 .06

 .04

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .00

 .06

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .06

 .06

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .00

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2005 WHISKEYTOWN LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 12, 2005

IN LAKE

EVAP.

C.F.S. * FRANCIS

COMPUTED

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2.2 17,917 5,600 0 13,206 75 .88

ACRE-FEET -2.2 35,538 11,108 0 26,194 149

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 26,194

SPILL 0 37,302

 211.6

OUTLET 11,108

TOTAL

JUDGE

CARR PP

(1)

 32

 66

 14

 14

 14

 14

 76

 111

 111

 111

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 112

 416

 0

 112

 0

 112

 112

 112

 102

 1,641

 3,255

FROM

TO

SPRING CR.

TO CLEAR CR

CLEAR

CR.

NATURAL

FLOW

 820

 635

 620

 576

 523

 454

 410

 315

 284

 252

 372

 359

 481

 437

 407

 411

 398

 466

 585

 945

 571

 832

 612

 635

 464

 417

 1,162

 1,833

 16,276

 32,283

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .60

 .39

 .01

 .03

 .13

 .00

 .87

 1.34

 .33

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .70

 1.40

 5.82

PRECIP

INCHES

PRECIPITATION

 5.82

 41.58

THIS MONTH

JULY 1, 2004 TO DATE

Table 5
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology and iron deposits of the western Serra do Curral, 
Minas Gerais, Brazil

#### Professional Paper 341-G

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                
    (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp341G 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:35
(No. 4688

#### Harry Meyers, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April*20, *1956.*

Harry Meyers, Claimant pro se.

Latham Castle, Attorney General; Thomas G. Cronin, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Tolson, C. J.

On September 6, 1955, Harry Meyers, an inmate of the Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet, Illinois, filed his complaint against the State of Illinois asking this Court for a declaratory judgment finding that he had served sufficient time for the crime that he had committed, and, further, that he be granted an award of $34,000.00 for wrongful incarceration.

The record consists of:

> *311(1) Motion and order to sue in forma pauperis.

> (2) Complaint.

> { 3) Report of the proceedings.

> (4) Order authorizing the waiving of brief and argument in said cause.

> (5) Commissioner’s report.

The facts of the case are as follows:

On April 23, 1929, claimant was convicted of robbery in Cook County, Illinois, and was sentenced to the Illinois State Penitentiary for a term of one year to life. He appeared before the Parole Board from time to time, and was paroled in 1950. In 1952, he was returned to the Penitentiary for violation of his parole.

The gist of his complaint is that, since his return to the Penitentiary, the Parole Board has never given him a set date for release,, so that he can accumulate good time towards reduction of the set date. He also claims that the Parole Board has acted in an unreasonable and arbitrary manner in the consideration of his case, and that he has served seventeen years more than should be required of him.

At the date of the hearing of his cause, respondent made a motion to strike the complaint on the grounds that it did not state a cause of action, and, in support thereof, urged that the question of parole lies solely within the discretion of the Parole Board, and not the Court of Claims. The Commissioner took the motion with the case, and, at the conclusion of the evidence, found in his report that the Court of Claims was without jurisdiction to either grant a parole, or award damages for alleged wrongful incarceration.

Chap. 38, Sec. 801 to 816, inc., of the Ill. Rev. Stats., as amended, provides a complete code for sentence and parole of persons convicted of crime. This act was found to be constitutional in the case of *People*vs. *Cohen,*307 *312Ill. 87. Nowhere in the act is there any provision for a review of the findings of the Parole Board by the Court of Claims.

It should also be pointed out that this Court has held in previous cases that it does not have jurisdiction to make awards where wrongful incarceration is charged. Citing *Montgomery*vs. *State,*21 C.C.R., 205; *Marcinkiewicz*vs. *State,*21 C.C.R., 153, *Harrison*vs. *State,*21 C.C.R., 245.

For the reasons above set forth, the motion of respondent to strike the complaint is allowed, and the complaint is hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
#### § 2568.73 Do I need to fill out a special application form?

Yes. You must complete form no. AK-2561-10, “Alaska Native Veteran Allotment Application.”
§ 10010.38 Response to comments. ( a ) Preparation of a final EIS need not be delayed in those cases where a Federal agency, from which comments are required to be obtained (40 CFR 1503.1(a)(l)), does not comment within the prescribed time period. Informal attempts will be made to determine the status of any such comments and every reasonable attempt should be made to include the comments and a response in the final EIS.
( b ) When other commentors are late, their comments should be included in the final EIS to the extent practicable.
February 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* FROM JUDGE CLEAR CR. RELEASE - C.F.S.

 1000 ACRE -FEET INFLOW FRANCIS NATURAL TO CLEAR CR. TO SPRING EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. CARR PP FLOW SPILL OUTLET

** CR. PP C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

209.8

1 1,199.65 209.1 -0.68 398 27 371 0 201 538 3 0.04 0.00

2 1,199.21 207.8 -1.31 360 27 333 0 201 815 3 0.04 0.00

3 1,199.13 207.5 -0.24 476 27 449 0 201 366 29 0.33 0.01

4 1,199.13 207.5 0.00 538 27 511 0 201 334 3 0.03 0.03

5 1,199.34 208.2 0.62 553 27 526 0 201 37 0 0.00 0.00

6 1,199.53 208.7 0.56 522 86 436 0 201 37 0 0.00 0.89

7 1,199.74 209.4 0.62 555 99 456 0 201 37 2 0.02 0.00

8 1,199.91 209.9 0.50 495 90 405 0 201 37 2 0.02 0.00

9 1,200.10 210.4 0.57 526 135 391 0 201 37 3 0.03 0.00

10 1,200.23 210.8 0.39 438 27 411 0 201 37 3 0.03 0.00

11 1,200.34 211.1 0.33 407 27 380 0 201 37 3 0.03 0.08

12 1,200.43 211.4 0.27 377 27 350 0 201 37 3 0.03 0.08

13 1,200.51 211.7 0.24 367 27 340 0 201 37 8 0.09 0.00

14 1,200.57 211.8 0.18 334 27 307 0 200 37 6 0.07 0.00

15 1,200.65 212.1 0.24 359 27 332 0 200 37 2 0.02 0.00

16 1,200.71 212.3 0.18 331 27 304 0 201 37 2 0.02 0.00

17 1,200.78 212.5 0.21 345 27 318 0 200 37 3 0.03 0.00

18 1,200.82 212.6 0.12 301 27 274 0 200 37 4 0.04 0.00

19 1,200.86 212.7 0.12 298 27 271 0 201 37 0 0.00 0.00

20 1,200.90 212.8 0.12 301 27 274 0 201 40 0 0.00 0.00

21 1,200.77 212.4 -0.39 281 27 254 0 201 258 19 0.21 0.00

22 1,200.53 211.7 -0.72 267 27 240 0 201 423 5 0.06 0.00

23 1,200.57 211.8 0.12 308 26 282 0 201 42 5 0.06 0.00

24 1,200.51 211.7 -0.18 488 27 461 0 201 378 0 0.00 0.00

25 1,200.36 211.2 -0.45 292 27 265 0 201 317 0 0.00 0.00

26 1,200.29 211.0 -0.21 424 27 397 0 201 329 0 0.00 0.00

27 1,200.26 210.9 -0.09 479 27 452 0 201 323 0 0.00 1.21

28 1,200.23 210.8 -0.09 470 27 443 0 201 314 0 0.00 1.21

TOTALS 1.03 11,290 1,057 10,233 0 5,624 5,032 108 1.20 3.51

ACRE-FEET 1,030 22,394 2,097 20,297 0 11,155 9,981 214

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

** WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 9,981 Outlet 11,155

Spill 0

Total 21136

Precipitation

This month = 3.51

October 01, 2022 To date = 41.96

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Whiskeytown Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 3/28/2023
§ 30.504 May a judge allow fees for attorneys representing interested parties? ( a ) Except for attorneys representing creditors, the judge may allow fees for attorneys representing interested parties. ( 1 ) At the discretion of the judge, these fees may be charged against the interests of the party represented or as a cost of administration.
( 2 ) Petitions for allowance of fees must be filed before the close of the last hearing.
( b ) Nothing in this section prevents an attorney from petitioning for additional fees to be considered at the disposition of a petition for rehearing and again after an appeal on the merits. An order allowing attorney fees is subject to a petition for rehearing and to an appeal.
[73 FR 67289, Nov. 13, 2008. Redesignated at 86 FR 72089, Dec. 20, 2021]
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

 

 

*Target Financial Objectives for Fiscal Year 2009 under the Annual Incentive Plan and Long Term Incentive Plan*

 

On February 11, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee) approved weighted target financial objectives for the Company’s 2009 Annual Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP). Awards will be based on the target payouts set forth below, which are expressed as a percentage of base salary. Specific payments to individuals could exceed the following targets if the Company achieves more than 100% of its target financial objectives, but in no event will the Annual Incentive Payment or LTIP individually exceed two times base salary.

 

| Title                                                                            |    | Target Payout % |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|----------------------|
|  

Chief Executive Officer                                                  |    | 100                  | % |
|                                                                             |         |                 |   |
| Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of MEDTOX Laboratories, Inc. |    | 50                   | % |
|                                                                             |         |                 |   |
| Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer                                       |         | 50                   | % |
|                                                                             |         |                 |   |
| Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of MEDTOX Diagnostics, Inc.           |         | 50                   | % |
|                                                                             |         |                 |   |
| Vice President Quality, Regulatory Affairs, and Human Resources                  |         | 50                   | % |

 

Employees must be employed by the Company as of December 31, 2009, and at the time of the awards in order to participate in the Plans, and awards may be adjusted on a pro rata basis to the extent any employee is employed for only a portion of the year 2009. The Chief Executive Officer will recommend individual awards for all participating employees (except for the Chief Executive Officer) for approval by the Committee based on an assessment of each individual’s performance. The Committee may approve or disapprove any recommended awards in whole or in part in its sole discretion. The Committee shall determine the award for the Chief Executive Officer based on an assessment of his performance for 2009.
### §458dd. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458dd was editorially reclassified as section 5364 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Patrick Soon-Shiong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 19, 2006 |  | /S/ PATRICK SOON-SHIONG
|                         |  | Patrick Soon-Shiong    
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Test well, Grandstand area, Alaska, with micropaleontologic 
study of Grandstand test well 1, northern Alaska

#### Professional Paper 305-E

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                
  (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp305E 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:14
#### § 3181.5 Compensatory royalty payment for unleased Federal land.

The unit agreement submitted by the unit proponent for approval by the authorized officer will provide for payment to the Federal Government of the current royalty percentage for leases offered on onshore oil and gas lease sales on production that would be attributable to unleased Federal lands in a PA of the unit if said lands were leased and committed to the unit agreement. The value of production subject to compensatory royalty payment will be determined pursuant to 30 CFR part 206, provided that no additional royalty will be due on any production subject to compensatory royalty under this provision.

[89 FR 30997, Apr. 23, 2024]