alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 21
                                         U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                                 Central Valley Operations Office

                                         Central Valley Project - California
Monthly Diversions in AF                                 2006

                             Jan     Feb     Mar     Apr     May     Jun     Jul     Aug     Sep     Oct     Nov     Dec    Total

CANALS
Contra Costa                 8432   10494    9429     298    9789   17946   14181   15830   12663   10587    7885    2538   120072
Delta-Mendota              240471  239578  200225   48483  110651  199739  270452  270127  260072  264891  239617  254129  2598435
Actual Fed Dos Amigos       62071   88956   50135   43904  127955  227786  255435  173087   80534   55149   48088   65633  1278733
Madera                          0    6998    9582   50187   58243   65717   61467   40836   28053   12300    6518    1267   341168
Friant-Kern                 76262  101305   77717  116390  129519  204689  270355  222029  121965   58898   34416   26533  1440078
Corning                         0     268       0      30    1779    3243    3896    3664    2454    1365      69     184    16952
Folsom-South                 1478    1914    2237    1565    3360    3396    3769    3830    3697    3763    3531    2410    34950
Tehama-Colusa                   0    6528       0    2430   35225   57131   64853   42736   18980    9348    2253    1166   240650

CACHUMA PROJECT
Tecolete Tunnel              1314    1930    1237    1401    1560    2526    3179    2917    2932    2560    2459    2031    26046

ORLAND PROJECT
Stony Creek                     0       0       0       0   13174   18249   18769   17175   13535   10421     470       0    91793
South Canal                     0       0       0       0    9651   12765    6016    5298    4346    3449     347       0    41872
North Canal                     0       0       0       0    3523    5484   12753   11877    9189    6972     123       0    49921

SOLANO PROJECT
Putah South Canal            3804    3644    3548    4225   21820   31502   34451   29229   20242    7847    1817    1974   164103


NA = Not Available at time of printing report.
§ 3276.12 What information must I give BLM in the monthly report for facility operations? ( a ) For all electrical generation facilities, include in your monthly report of facility operations: ( 1 ) Mass of steam and/or hot water, in klbs, used or brought into the facility. For facilities using both steam and hot water, you must report the mass of each;
( 2 ) The temperature of the steam or hot water in deg. F;
( 3 ) The pressure of the steam or hot water in psi. You must also specify whether this is psig or psia;
( 4 ) Gross generation in kilowatt hours (kwh);
( 5 ) Net generation at the tailgate of the facility in kwh;
( 6 ) Temperature in deg. F and volume of the steam or hot water exiting the facility;
( 7 ) The number of hours the plant was on line;
( 8 ) A brief description of any outages; and
( 9 ) Any other information we may require.
( b ) For electrical generation facilities where Federal royalty is based on the sale of electricity to a utility, in addition to the information required under paragraph (a) of this section, you must include the following information in your monthly report of facility operations: ( 1 ) Amount of electricity delivered to the sales point in kwh, if the sales point is different from the tailgate of the facility;
( 2 ) Amount of electricity lost to transmission;
( 3 ) A report from the utility purchasing the electricity documenting the total number of kwh delivered to the sales point during the month, or monthly reporting period if it is not a calendar month, and the number of kwh delivered during diurnal and seasonal pricing periods; and
( 4 ) Any other information we may require.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.426 Change in status involving an individual; ineligibility occurs.

Whenever benefits are suspended or terminated for an individual because of ineligibility, no benefit is payable for that month.

[50 FR 48571, Nov. 26, 1985]
Exhibit 23.4



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


            We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Pre-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement No. 333-87568 of Chesapeake
Funding LLC (formerly known as Greyhound Funding LLC) on Form S-3 of our report
dated January 21, 2002 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
explanatory paragraphs relating to Chesapeake Funding LLC if it had been
operated as an unaffiliated entity and the adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Chesapeake Funding LLC for the year ended December 31, 2001, appearing in the
Prospectus, which is a part of this Registration Statement.

            We also consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
the Registration Statement No. 333-87568-01 of D.L. Peterson Trust on Form S-1
of our report dated January 21, 2002 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to D.L. Peterson Trust if it had been
operated as an unaffiliated entity) appearing in the Prospectus, which is a part
of this Registration Statement.

            We also consent to the reference to us under the headings "Selected
Financial Data" and "Experts" in such Prospectus.



/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
May 17, 2002
§ 662.400 Who is the One-Stop operator? ( a ) The One-Stop operator is the entity that performs the role described in paragraph (c) of this section. The types of entities that may be selected to be the One-Stop operator include: ( 1 ) A postsecondary educational institution;
( 2 ) An Employment Service agency established under the Wagner-Peyser Act on behalf of the local office of the agency;
( 3 ) A private, nonprofit organization (including a community-based organization);
( 4 ) A private for-profit entity;
( 5 ) A government agency; and
( 6 ) Another interested organization or entity.
( b ) One-Stop operators may be a single entity or a consortium of entities and may operate one or more One-Stop centers. In addition, there may be more than one One-Stop operator in a local area.
( c ) The agreement between the Local Board and the One-Stop operator shall specify the operator's role. That role may range between simply coordinating service providers within the center, to being the primary provider of services within the center, to coordinating activities throughout the One-Stop system. (WIA sec. 121(d).)
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DASHON HINES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 24-1734 (UNA)

)

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on initial review of plaintiff’s pro se complaint, ECF No. 

1, and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. The Court will grant the 

in forma pauperis application and dismiss the complaint without prejudice. 

Complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to “less stringent standards” than those 

applied to pleadings drafted by lawyers. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Still, pro 

se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. 

Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a 

complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction 

depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, 

and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a). It “does not 

require detailed factual allegations, but it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendantunlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations 

omitted). In addition, Rule 8(d) states that “[e]ach allegation must be simple, concise, and 

direct.” FED. R. CIV. P. 8(d)(1). “Taken together, [those provisions] underscore the emphasis 

placed on clarity and brevity by the federal pleading rules.” Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 

(D.C. Cir. 2004) (cleaned up). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair notice of 
2

the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer, mount an adequate 

defense, and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. See Brown v. Califano, 75 

F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 

Plaintiff, a resident of Buffalo, New York, alleges the Federal Aviation Administration 

(“FAA”) discriminated against him by refusing “to issue credit cards, hire, allow boarding of 

aircrafts, and entry to airports due to race and financial income.” Compl. at 4. There simply are 

no facts to support plaintiff’s discrimination claim. For starters, there are no factual allegations 

to establish that the FAA itself issues credit cards. Nor are there allegations that plaintiff 

attempted to enter a specific airport, or board a particular flight, or applied for and was denied 

employment. The attachments that accompany the complaint are of little help either. Those that 

even relate to the FAA are generic policy documents, which do not illuminate the gravamen of 

plaintiff’s injury. 

As drafted, the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 

8(a). The Court, therefore, will dismiss the complaint without prejudice. An Order is issued 

separately.

DATE: July 24, 2024 TREVOR N. McFADDEN

United States District Judge
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4655 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to permit the Merit Systems Protection 

Board to hear certain cases relating to allegations of certain reprisals 

by employees of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2022 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, 

Mrs. BLACKBURN, and Mr. OSSOFF) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to permit the Merit 

Systems Protection Board to hear certain cases relating 

to allegations of certain reprisals by employees of the 

Federal Bureau of Investigation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Bureau of In5 vestigations Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4655 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPEALS TO MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 

2 RELATING TO FBI REPRISAL ALLEGATIONS. 

3 Section 2303 of title 5, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(d)(1) An employee of the Federal Bureau of Inves6 tigation who makes an allegation of a reprisal under regu7 lations promulgated under this section may appeal a final 

8 determination or corrective action order by the Bureau 

9 under those regulations to the Merit Systems Protection 

10 Board pursuant to section 1221. 

11 ‘‘(2) If no final determination or corrective action 

12 order has been made or issued for an allegation described 

13 in paragraph (1) before the expiration of the 180-day pe14 riod beginning on the date on which the allegation is re15 ceived by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the em16 ployee described in that paragraph may seek corrective ac17 tion directly from the Merit Systems Protection Board 

18 pursuant to section 1221.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
1

Medina, Dayana

From: Crouch, Kelley <KELLEY.CROUCH@domtar.com>

Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 4:09 PM

To: mac@adeq.state.ar.us

Cc: Medina, Dayana; jjewell@trinityconsultants.com

Subject: Domtar Updated BART

Attachments: removed.txt; BART Update v13 03_compiled.pdf; Domtar BART Consolidated 2014-05-14r.xlsx; R6 

Comments- Domtar BART analysis_8-29-13.pdf

Please find attached Domtar’s Response to EPA Comments, updated BART report, and an excel spreadsheet including

consolidated modeling, stack test and cost calculations as referred to in the response document.

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me at your convenience.

Regards,

Kelley Crouch

Domtar Ashdown Mill

P 870-898-2711 x26168 | F 870-898-3697

   The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

Domtar

285 Highway 71 South

Ashdown, AR 71822

Paper informs us, persuades us, educates us and organizes us. It's OK to use paper. Learn More.

This email is for the exclusive use of the addressee and is subject to Domtar Confidentiality Notice.
#### Alice C. R. Calhoun, Appellant, v. Samuel J. Calhoun, Respondent.

Order dated March 11,1948, confirming the report of an official referee and denying plaintiff’s motion to modify the judgment of separation and award to her the sole and exclusive custody of the children of the parties; and denying a cross motion by defendant for like and other relief, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. Order dated March 15, 1948, modifying .the judgment of separation herein to provide that custody of the children of the parties be in Saint Clare Academy, Mount Hope, Hastings-on-Hudson, N. Y.; providing for visitation of the parties at that school; directing defendant to pay for the expenses of the children at said school and relieving defendant from further payments of alimony to plaintiff, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
### §5505. Gross receipts from conveyed lands

#### (a) Deposit to credit of tribe; nonapplicability

Any and all gross receipts derived from, or which relate to, the property conveyed by this chapter, the Act of July 20, 1956 (70 Stat. 581), the Act of August 2, 1956 (70 Stat. 941), the Act of October 9, 1972 (86 Stat. 795), and section 1 of the Act of October 13, 1972 (86 Stat. 806) which were received by the United States subsequent to its acquisition by the United States under the statutes cited in section 5501 of this title and prior to such conveyance, from whatever source and for whatever purpose, including but not limited to the receipts in the special fund of the Treasury as required by section 6 of the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands of August 7, 1947 (61 Stat. 913, 915) [30 U.S.C. 355], shall as of October 17, 1975, be deposited to the credit of the Indian tribe receiving such land and may be expended by the tribe for such beneficial programs as the tribal governing body may determine: Provided, That this section shall not apply to any such receipts received prior to October 17, 1975, from the leasing of public domain minerals which were subject to the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (41 Stat. 437) [30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.], as amended and supplemented.

#### (b) Administration of gross receipts

All gross receipts (including but not limited to bonuses, rents, and royalties) hereafter derived by the United States from any contract, permit or lease referred to in section 5504(a) of this title, or otherwise, shall be administered in accordance with the laws and regulations applicable to receipts from property held in trust by the United States for Indian tribes.

(Pub. L. 94–114, §5, Oct. 17, 1975, 89 Stat. 579.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of July 20, 1956, referred to in subsec. (a), is act July 20, 1956, ch. 645, 70 Stat. 581, which was set out as a note under former section 465 of this title and was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

Act of August 2, 1956, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 886, 70 Stat. 941, which was not classified to the Code.

Act of October 9, 1972, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 92–480, Oct. 9, 1972, 86 Stat. 795, which was not classified to the Code.

Section 1 of the Act of October 13, 1972, referred to in subsec. (a), is section 1 of Pub. L. 92–488, Oct. 13, 1972, 86 Stat. 806, which was not classified to the Code.

The Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which is classified generally to chapter 3A (§181 et seq.) of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 181 of Title 30 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 459d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 3120.41 General. ( a ) The lands available for competitive lease sale under this subpart will be described in a Notice of Competitive Lease Sale.
( b ) The time, date, and place of the competitive lease sale will be stated in the notice.
( c ) The notice will include an identification of, and a copy of, stipulations applicable to each parcel.
[GRAPHIC OMITTED] DnBNOR

To Shareholders of Acergy S.A.

Our ref.                                                  Date
Registrars Department/ij                                  Oslo, January 15, 2010

                                   ACERGY S.A.
             VOTING EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING FEBRUARY 16, 2010

Your holding of Common Shares of Acergy S.A. is registered in The Norwegian
Central Securities Depository (Verdipapirsentralen - the "VPS"). If you wish to
vote at this Extraordinary General Meeting you may either attend in person at
the said general meeting or if you have not previously issued a proxy for the
same purpose you may execute the enclosed proxy card and return it to us.

You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box on the
enclosed proxy card. When properly executed, the proxy will be voted in the
manner directed therein or, if no direction is indicated, will be voted "for"
the proposal.

Enclosed, please find a return envelope for your proxy card. In order for your
shares to be voted based on your executed proxy card, the card has to be
received by DnB NOR Bank ASA, Registrars Department, Oslo, not later than
February 9, 2010, 12:00 hours Central European Time.


Yours sincerely,
for DnB NOR Bank ASA
Registrars Department

Irene Johansen

DnB NOR Bank ASA Office Stranden 21, Oslo Postal address NO-0021 Oslo, Norway
Telephone +47 91 50 30 00 Fax +47 22 94 90 20 www.dnbnor.no Register of Business
Enterprises NO 984 851 006 MVA
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Michaels Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the period
ended November 1, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December
16, 2003
    
    /s/ R. Michael RouleauR. Michael RouleauPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Jeffrey N. BoyerJeffrey N. BoyerExecutive Vice President  Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE**

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Lone Star Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries

Dallas, Texas:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 333-41130 and 333-100579 of Lone Star Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-64805, 333-38458, 333-46310, 333-46312, 333-106410, and 333-119293 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 28, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Lone Star Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lone Star Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

Ouraudits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned reportalso included the financial statement schedule of Lone Star Technologies, Inc.,listed in Item 8 of Form 10-K.  Thisfinancial statement schedule is the responsibility of Lone Star Technologies,Inc.’s management.  Our responsibility isto express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered inrelation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly inall material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

DELOITTE& TOUCHE LLP

Dallas,Texas

February28, 2005

 

----
### §277. Former Apache military post established as Theodore Roosevelt Indian School

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to establish and maintain the former Fort Apache military post as an Indian boarding school for the purpose of carrying out treaty obligations, to be known as the Theodore Roosevelt Indian School: Provided, That the Fort Apache military post, and land appurtenant thereto, shall remain in the possession and custody of the Secretary of the Interior so long as they shall be required for Indian school purposes.

(Jan. 24, 1923, ch. 42, 42 Stat. 1187.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Lands Held in Trust for White Mountain Apache Tribe

Pub. L. 86–392, Mar. 18, 1960, 74 Stat. 8, provided: "That all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the lands, together with the improvements thereon, included in the former Fort Apache Military Reservation, created by Executive order of February 1, 1877, and subsequently set aside by the Act of January 24, 1923 (42 Stat. 1187) [this section], as a site for the Theodore Roosevelt School, located within the boundaries of the Fort Apache Indian Reservation, Arizona, are hereby declared to be held by the United States in trust for the White Mountain Apache Tribe, subject to the right of the Secretary of the Interior to use any part of the land and improvements for administrative or school purposes for as long as they are needed for that purpose."

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.