alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JEANNE ZOLEZZI

jzolezzi@herumcrabtree.com 

VIA EMAIL

bmillerlevy@usbr.gov

May 2, 2014

Ms. Brooke Miller-Levy

Mid Pacific Regional Office

Federal Office Building

2800 Cottage Way

Sacramento CA 95825-1898

Re: Comments on CVP Cost Allocation Study Draft Findings and 

Recommendations Table 

Dear Ms. Miller-Levy:

The following comments are submitted on behalf of Stockton East Water District on 

the CVP Cost Allocation Study Draft Findings and Recommendations. 

Water Supply Deliveries

The table indicates that “Future water deliveries will be estimated by the CalSim2 

model . . . . Reclamation will have to determine how future water deliveries will be 

made for the New Melones Project independently, as there is no current plan of 

operations. 

Water Quality: Benefits Methodology

The table states:

The CVP maintains increased flows in the Trinity, American, and Stanislaus 

rivers to improve the fisheries habitat and water quality conditions. Flow 

conditions in the lower reaches of the Trinity, American, and Stanislaus 

rivers are maintained under flow requirements set by the California State 

Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). These costs are generally 
Ms. Brooke Miller-Levy

May 5, 2014

Page 2

embedded in the costs of operating and maintaining the CVP, and for the 

most part, reimbursed by the authorized water and power beneficiaries. The 

costs of providing increased flows in the Stanislaus River however, are 

deemed non-reimbursable and assigned to the water quality purpose for the 

New Melones Unit.

When referencing increased flows to improve fisheries habitat flows in the 

Stanislaus are not maintained solely under flow requirements set by the State Water 

Resources Control Board. For many times of the year the flow requirements are 

governed not by State Board decisions, but by Biological Opinions established for 

the project.

Very truly yours,

JEANNE M. ZOLEZZI

Attorney-at-Law

cc: Mr. Scot Moody
#### § 3.9 Form and reference of permit.

Every permit shall be in writing and copies shall be transmitted to the Smithsonian Institution and the field officer in charge of the land involved. The permitee will be furnished with a copy of the regulations in this part.
§ 3251.14 Do I need a bond for conducting exploration operations? ( a ) You must not start any exploration operations on BLM-managed lands until we approve your bond. You may meet the requirement for an exploration bond in two ways: ( 1 ) If you have an existing nationwide or statewide oil and gas exploration bond, provide a rider in an amount we have specified to include geothermal resources exploration operations; or
( 2 ) If you must file a new bond for geothermal exploration, the minimum amounts are: ( i ) $5,000 for a single operation;
( ii ) $25,000 for all of your operations within a state; and
( iii ) $50,000 for all of your operations on public lands nationwide.
( b ) See subparts 3214 and 3215 for additional details on bonding procedures.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4454 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

236 Concord Exchange North in South Saint Paul, Minnesota, as the 

‘‘Officer Leo Pavlak Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2022 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Ms. SMITH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 236 Concord Exchange North in South Saint 

Paul, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Officer Leo Pavlak Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OFFICER LEO PAVLAK POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 236 Concord Exchange North 

6 in South Saint Paul, Minnesota, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Officer Leo Pavlak Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4454 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Officer Leo Pavlak 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### §412a. Exemption from taxation of lands subject to restrictions against alienation; determination of homestead

All homesteads, heretofore purchased out of the trust or restricted funds of individual Indians, are hereby declared to be instrumentalities of the Federal Government and shall be nontaxable until otherwise directed by Congress: Provided, That the title to such homesteads shall be held subject to restrictions against alienation or encumbrance except with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior: And provided further, That the Indian owner or owners shall select, with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, either the agricultural and grazing lands, not exceeding a total of one hundred and sixty acres, or the village, town, or city property, not exceeding in cost $5,000, to be designated as a homestead.

(June 20, 1936, ch. 622, §2, 49 Stat. 1542; May 19, 1937, ch. 227, 50 Stat. 188.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1937—Act May 19, 1937, substituted "All homesteads" and "individual Indians" for "All lands the title to which is now held by an Indian subject to restrictions against alienation or encumbrance except with the consent or approval of the Secretary of the Interior" and "said Indian", respectively, and inserted two provisos.
(No. 1026

Claim denied.)

#### Ruth Edwards, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 10, 1927.*

Respondeat *superior*— when *State not liable.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court in *Shellabarger*v. *State, supra.*

Russell F. Meyer, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. J ustice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for $3000.00 damages caused by an accident which occurred April 30, 1925, on State Highway No. 2 near Minonk in Woodford county.

The facts in this case are the samé as in the case of *Clifford Deane Shellabarger*v. *The State of Illinois,*No. 1025, and the decision of the court in this case will be the same as in that one.

The demurrer will be sustained, the claim disallowed and case dismissed.
### §589. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–206, §9, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 739, which exempted distributed funds from Federal and State income taxes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3627]


State of Florida; (Amendment <greek-i>1)

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
September 17, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
include Okaloosa County as disaster area due to damages caused by 
Hurricane Ivan occurring on September 13, 2004 and continuing.
    All other counties contiguous to the above named primary county 
have previously been declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is November 15, 2004 and for 
economic injury the deadline is June 16, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: September 22, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-21893 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 10.48
  
   RESPONSIBILITIES
 BASE COMPENSATION
 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION.




---



##### 



STOCK OPTIONS th
 BENEFITS.
   VACATION
 EXPENSES
  2




---



##### 



SEVERANCE. nolo contendere
 TERM.
 CONFIDENTIALITY
  3




---



##### 



NON-COMPETE; NONSOLICITATION provided
 NONDISPARAGEMENT
 INVENTIONS
  4




---



##### 



REMEDY FOR BREACH AND MODIFICATION
 SEVERABILITY
 CONFLICTS
 ARBITRATION
  5




---



##### 



Very truly yours,/s/ Bruce G. Crain

Bruce G. CrainPresident and CEOKid Brands, Inc.
 ACCEPTED AND AGREED:/s/ Dean Robinson

Dean RobinsonDate: May 26, 2011
   6




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 
   
    
    VPs with less than 1 year of service with the Company would receive 4 months of
severance pay
 
    
    VPs with at least 1 year of service but less than 2 years of service with the
Company would receive 6 months of severance pay
 
    
    VPs with at least 2 years of service but less than 6 years of service with the
Company would receive 8 months of severance pay
 
    
    VPs with at least 6 years of service but less than 10 years of service with the
Company would receive 10 months of severance pay
 
    
    VPs with 10 or more years of service with the Company would receive 12 months
(i.e., one year) of severance pay
 provided
  A-1




---



##### 



provided
  A-2




---



##### 



A-3
§ 2361.6 Effect of law. ( a ) Subject to valid existing rights, and except as provided by the Department of the Interior Appropriations Act, Fiscal Year 1981 (Pub. L. 96-514), all lands within the exterior boundaries of the Reserve are reserved and withdrawn from all forms of entry and disposition under the public land laws, including the mining and mineral leasing laws, and all other acts.
( b ) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary is authorized to: ( 1 ) Make dispositions of mineral materials pursuant to the Act of July 31, 1947 (61 Stat. 681), as amended (30 U.S.C. 601), for appropriate use by Alaska Natives and the North Slope Borough.
( 2 ) Make such dispositions of mineral materials and grant such rights-of-way, licenses, and permits as may be necessary to carry out the Secretary's responsibilities under the Act.
( 3 ) Convey the surface of lands properly selected on or before December 18, 1975, by Native village corporations pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, as amended (43 U.S.C. 1601, *et seq.*).
( 4 ) Grant such rights-of-way to the North Slope Borough, under the provisions of title V of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1761 *et seq.*) or section 28 of the Mineral Leasing Act, as amended (30 U.S.C. 185), as may be necessary to permit the North Slope Borough to provide energy supplies to villages on the North Slope.
( c ) All other provisions of law heretofore enacted and actions heretofore taken reserving such lands as a Reserve shall remain in full force and effect to the extent not inconsistent with the Act.
( d ) To the extent not inconsistent with the Act, all other public land laws are applicable.
#### Haulenbeck and others *vs.*Cronkright and others.

1. Where a partition is made upon wrong principles, or in disregard of the rights of the parties, or where there is a great and evident inequality-in the division, the return of the commissioners will be quashed.

2. Equal partition among all the owners, of each parcel, is not required. And a partition so made, without necessity, and practically destructive of the value of the parcel divided, will be set aside.

On motion to suppress return of commissioners in partition, and proofs taken in opposition to the return, and in support thereof.

*JIr. G. II. Voo?'his,*for the motion.

*Mr. B. Williamson,*contra.

The ChajvCeli,oe.

A careful examination of the return of the commissioners, and of the testimony taken to be used on this motion, satisfies me that there is no just canse of complaint in regard to the partition in this case, except as to the division of the triangular piece of land. That lot is of the dimensions of one hundred and eighty feet on the base line, on Bergen turnpike, the other lines being, respectively, one hundred and eighty-six feet and two hundred and twenty-seven feet and five inches. It is valued at about $1500 an acre. The commissioners divided it into six equal triangular parts, each having a front of thirty feet on the turnpike, and extending to the apex of the plot divided. One of the owners, among whom the partition is to he made, is an infant, entitled to an equal sixth part of the premises to be partitioned. Such a partition of this lot is practically destructive of the infant’s interest therein. The property is in a rural neighborhood, and though land there commands a price far beyond its value for agricultural *160purposes, it is in no such demand as to justify the division of so small a tract of such a shape into six equal parts. The adult owners, by joining their lots, may, perhaps, protect themselves to a certain extent, against the consequences of such a partition. But not so the infant, in whose behalf this motion is made. The commissioners seem to have acted upon the supposition that they were required to make equal partition among all the owners, of each parcel. I find no reason to question the propriety of their action in respect to any other part of the property. But as to this, their partition is destructive of the value of the thing divided. Nor was there any necessity for such a partition of this lot. In dividing the whole property this plot might have been assigned to one person. Where a partition is made upon wrong principles, or in disregard of the rights of the parties, or where there is a great and evident inequality in the division, the court will quash'the return of the commissioners. *In the matter of Thompson’s estate, 2 Green’s Ch. 637; Hay*v. *Estill,*4 *C. E. Green*134.

In this case, in the particular under consideration, the commissioners have disregarded the rights of the parties, and have proceeded on a wrong principle. The return, therefore, will be quashed, and a new commission will be issued to other commissioners.
### §329. Availability of appropriations for transportation

Appropriations for carrying out this chapter shall also be available for the transportation of any eligible person and necessary attendants to or from a hospital (including any hospital of a State or political subdivision to which an eligible person is released under section 323 of this title), to the place where a relative to whom any person is released under section 323 of this title resides, or to a person's home upon his discharge from hospitalization under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 86–571, §9, July 5, 1960, 74 Stat. 310.)
§ 3173.13 Requirements for approved facility measurement points. ( a ) For an existing facility in service on or before January 17, 2017, an operator must start using an FMP number for reporting production to ONRR on its OGOR for the fourth production month after the BLM assigns the FMP number(s), and every month thereafter. (For example, for a facility that is assigned an FMP number on January 15, 2016, the effective date of the FMP is the May production report.) For a new facility in service after January 17, 2017, an operator must start using an FMP number for reporting production to ONRR on its OGOR for the first production month after the BLM assigns the FMP number(s), and every month thereafter. (For example, for a facility that is assigned an FMP number on January 15, 2016, the effective date of the FMP is the February production report.)
( b ) ( 1 ) The operator must file a Sundry Notice that describes any changes or modifications made to the FMP within 30 days after the change. This requirement does not apply to temporary modifications (*e.g.,* for maintenance purposes). These include any changes and modifications to the information listed on an application submitted under § 3173.12.
( 2 ) The description must include details such as the primary element, secondary element, LACT/CMS meter, tank number(s), and wells or facilities using the FMP.
( 3 ) The Sundry Notice must specify what was changed and the effective date, and include, if appropriate, an amended site facility diagram (see § 3173.11).
### §1920. Improper removal of child from custody; declination of jurisdiction; forthwith return of child: danger exception

Where any petitioner in an Indian child custody proceeding before a State court has improperly removed the child from custody of the parent or Indian custodian or has improperly retained custody after a visit or other temporary relinquishment of custody, the court shall decline jurisdiction over such petition and shall forthwith return the child to his parent or Indian custodian unless returning the child to his parent or custodian would subject the child to a substantial and immediate danger or threat of such danger.

(Pub. L. 95–608, title I, §110, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3075.)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21985]



[[Page 58460]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, Member Conflict B.
    Date: October 5, 2004.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Teresa Levitin, PhD, Director, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
8401, (301) 443-2755.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Initial 
Review Group, Training and Career Development Subcommittee.
    Date: November 16-18, 2004.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Ritz-Carlton Hotel at Pentagon City, 1250 South Hayes 
Street, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Contact Person: Eliane Lazar-Wesley, PhD, Health Scientist 
Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on 
Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Room 220, MSC 8401, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, 301-451-4530.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards, 93.278 Drug Abuse 
National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug 
Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
    Dated: September 23, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-21985 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 3137.24 Why would BLM reject a unit agreement application? BLM will reject a unit agreement application— ( a ) That does not address all mandatory terms, including those required under § 3137.21(b) of this subpart;
( b ) If the unit operator— ( 1 ) Has an unsatisfactory record of complying with applicable laws, regulations, the terms of any lease or permit, or the requirements of any notice or order; or
( 2 ) Is not qualified to operate within NPR-A under applicable laws and regulations;
( c ) That does not conserve natural resources;
( d ) That is not in the public interest;
( e ) That does not comply with any special conditions in effect for any part of the NPR-A that the unit or any lease subject to the unit would affect; or
( f ) That does not comply with the requirements of this subpart.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4553 

AN ACT 

To extend other transaction authority for the Department 

of Homeland Security. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4553 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extension of Depart3 ment of Homeland Security Other Transaction Authority 

4 Act of 2022’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY OTHER 

6 TRANSACTION AUTHORITY. 

7 Section 831 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

8 (6 U.S.C. 391) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 

10 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

11 by striking ‘‘September 30, 2017’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘September 30, 2024’’; and 

13 (B) by amending paragraph (2) to read as 

14 follows: 

15 ‘‘(2) PROTOTYPE PROJECTS.—The Secretary— 

16 ‘‘(A) may, under the authority of para17 graph (1), carry out prototype projects under 

18 section 4022 of title 10, United States Code; 

19 and 

20 ‘‘(B) in applying the authorities of such 

21 section 4022, the Secretary shall perform the 

22 functions of the Secretary of Defense as pre23 scribed in such section.’’; 

24 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘September 

25 30, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2024’’; and 
3 

†S 4553 ES

1 (3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘section 

2 845(e)’’ and all that follows through the period at 

3 the end and inserting ‘‘section 4022(e) of title 10, 

4 United States Code.’’. 

Passed the Senate September 20, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4553 

AN ACT 

To extend other transaction authority for the 

Department of Homeland Security.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 529

 551

 537

 531

 527

 524

 526

 513

 507

 506

 509

 509

 506

 503

 506

 512

 506

 487

 517

 515

 495

 495

 496

 494

 487

 490

 499

 502

 512

 508

 518

 471

 484

 485

 486

 485

 485

 483

 392

 478

 475

 471

 467

 465

 460

 463

 464

 455

 448

 449

 468

 462

 463

 465

 463

 469

 471

 474

 478

 482

 482

 490

 502

 506

 505

 502

 501

 497

 499

 489

 491

 488

 485

 482

 480

 481

 481

 482

 475

 465

 477

 487

 473

 474

 475

 476

 475

 478

 482

 486

 492

 495

 502

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
### §458bbb–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458bbb–2, Pub. L. 93–638, title V, §503, as added Pub. L. 106–568, title XIII, §1302, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2938, was renumbered section 803 of Pub. L. 93–638 and transferred to section 458ddd–2 of this title prior to editorial reclassification as section 5423 of this title.