alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 25, 2011

By Email Esta Rosenberg, Chief U.S. Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Spirit Airlines Application for Exemption, Fort Lauderdale (FLL) – Toluca, Mexico (TLC) (DOT-OST-2011-0011)

Dear Ms. Rosenberg,

We have completed the poll of the carriers served with Spirit Airlines’ application of January 18, 2011 for an exemption pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 to institute service between Fort Lauderdale, Florida (F LL) and Toluca, Mexico (TLC).

Spirit received non-objections from each of the carrier parties served. We request expedited approval of Spirit’s application.

Respectfully submitted,

David M. Kirstein

cc: Docket OST 2011-0011

Service ListCertificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have this day se rved the foregoing document by email on the following persons:

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com nssparks@fedex.com rpommer@atlasair.com

bkeiner@crowell.com

hershel.kamen@coair.com

dan.weiss@coair.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jeff.morgan@delta.com

bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com jeffrey.manley@united.com robert.land@jetblue.com

msinick@ssd.com cdonley@ssd.com

anbird@fedex.com dvaughan@kelleydrye.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com efaberman@wileyrein.com howard_kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com jhill@dlalaw.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com

carl.nelson@aa.com mlbenge@zsrlaw.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com Barbara.russel@virginamerica.com Robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com mchopra@jamhoff.com russell.bailey@alpa.org donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil john.allen@faa.gov urskr@state.gov gmeyer@broward.org esta.rosenberg@dot.gov brian.hedberg@dot.gov Linda.lundell@dot.gov

Sophy.chen@hklaw.com

_______________________ Lyndsey Grunewald January 25, 2011
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

 

***Report ofIndependent Auditors***

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Landmark Bancorp, Inc.

Dodge City, Kansas

 

 

We have audited the consolidated balancesheet of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (formerly Landmark Bancshares, Inc.) and subsidiaryas of September 30, 2000, and the related accompanying consolidated statementsof operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flowsfor year then ended.  These financialstatements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinionon these financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance withauditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America.  Those standards require that we plan andperform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financialstatements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting theamounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles usedand significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overallfinancial statement presentation.  Webelieve that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statementsreferred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financialposition of Landmark Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary as of September 30, 2000,and the results of their operations and cash flows for the year then ended, inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Statesof America.

 

 

 
|             |   | /s/ Regier Carr & Monroe, L.L.P. |   |
|------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|             |   |                                 |
|             |   |                                 |
| October 26, 2000 |   |                                 |
| Wichita, Kansas  |   |                                 |

 

1

----
§ 3212.18 What are the production incentives for leases? You will receive a production incentive in the form of a temporary 50 percent reduction in your royalties under MMS regulations at 30 CFR 218.307 if: ( a ) Your lease was in effect prior to August 8, 2005;
( b ) You do not convert the royalty rates of your lease under § 3212.25;
( c ) By August 7, 2011, production from or allocated to your lease is utilized for commercial production in a: ( 1 ) New facility (see § 3212.22); or
( 2 ) Qualified expansion project (see § 3212.21); and
( d ) The production from your lease is used for the commercial generation of electricity.
### §736. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–89, title II, §206, Aug. 18, 1987, 101 Stat. 671, which established a Federal reservation and set out provisions relating to conveyances of title, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 2887.12 How do I renew my grant? ( a ) You must apply to BLM to renew the grant at least 120 calendar days before your grant expires. BLM will renew the grant if the pipeline is being operated and maintained in accordance with the grant, these regulations, and the Act. If your grant has expired or terminated, you must apply for a new grant under subpart 2884 of this part.
( b ) The BLM may modify the terms and conditions of the grant at the time of renewal, and you must pay the cost recovery fees.
( c ) The time and conditions for processing applications for rights-of-way, as described at § 2884.21 of this part, apply to applications for renewals.
( d ) If you make a timely and sufficient application for a renewal of your existing grant or for a new grant in accordance with this section, the existing grant does not expire until we have issued a decision to approve or deny the application.
( e ) If we deny your application, you may appeal the decision under § 2881.10.
( f ) If you do not submit your application under paragraph (a) of this section at least 120 days prior to authorization expiration, it is considered delinquent; the BLM will not be subject to the customer service standards in this chapter, and it will be processed only as time and resources are available.
( g ) The BLM will review your application and determine if you have complied with all of the provisions in this part and whether or not your authorized use will be renewed. The BLM will notify you within 30 days from acceptance of a complete application if it will take longer than 60 days to review your application.
[70 FR 21078, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 81 FR 92230, Dec. 19, 2016; 89 FR 25976, Apr. 12, 2024]
#### § 3130.6 Leasing maps and land descriptions.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50079-50082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2013-19416]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement

[Docket ID BSEE-2013-0005; OMB Control Number 1014-0017: 134E1700D2 
EEEE500000 ET1SF0000.DAQ000]

Information Collection Activities: Safety and Environmental 
Management Systems (SEMS); Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Correction

    In notice document 2013-19416 appearing on pages 48890 through 
48893 in the issue of Monday, August 12, 2013, beginning on page 48892, 
BSEE form BSEE-0130 is corrected to appear as photographed below.
BILLING CODE 1501-05-D

[[Page 50080]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16AU13.011

[[Page 50081]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16AU13.999

[[Page 50082]]

[FR Doc. C1-2013-19416 Filed 8-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1501-05-C
```
#### Dorothy L. Kutner, Appellant, v. Win Nathanson & Associates, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §4164. Performance reports

#### (a) Requirement

For each fiscal year, each recipient shall—

(1) review the progress it has made during such fiscal year in carrying out the Indian housing plan (or plans) for the Indian tribes for which it administers grant amounts; and

(2) submit a report to the Secretary (in a form acceptable to the Secretary) describing the conclusions of the review.

#### (b) Content

Each report under this section for a fiscal year shall—

(1) describe the use of grant amounts provided to the recipient for such fiscal year;

(2) assess the relationship of such use to the planned activities identified in the Indian housing plan of the grant beneficiary; and

(3) indicate the programmatic accomplishments of the recipient.

#### (c) Submission

The Secretary shall establish dates for submission of reports under this section, and review such reports and make such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

#### (d) Public availability

A recipient preparing a report under this section shall make the report publicly available to the citizens in the jurisdiction of the recipient in sufficient time to permit such citizens to comment on such report prior to its submission to the Secretary, and in such manner and at such times as the recipient may determine. The report shall include a summary of any comments received by the grant beneficiary or recipient from citizens in its jurisdiction regarding its program.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title IV, §404, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4040; Pub. L. 110–411, title IV, §403, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4330.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–330, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4016, known as the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4101 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 110–411, §403(1), substituted "planned activities" for "goals" and inserted "and" after semicolon at end.

Subsec. (b)(3), (4). Pub. L. 110–411, §403(2), (3), substituted period for "; and" at end of par. (3) and struck out par. (4) which read as follows: "describe the manner in which the recipient would change its programs as a result of its experiences."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1997, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 107 of Pub. L. 104–330, set out as a note under section 4101 of this title.
### §1672. Regulations

Prior to any revision of or amendment to rules or regulations promulgated pursuant to this chapter, the Secretary shall consult with Indian tribes and appropriate national or regional Indian organizations and shall publish any proposed revision or amendment in the Federal Register not less than sixty days prior to the effective date of such revision or amendment in order to provide adequate notice to, and receive comments from, other interested parties.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title VIII, §802, formerly title VII, §702, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1413; renumbered title VIII, §802, and amended Pub. L. 102–573, title VII, §701(a), (b), title VIII, §802, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4572, 4585.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 94–437, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1400, known as the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–573, §802, amended section generally, substituting present provisions for former provisions relating in subsec. (a) to consideration, formulation, proposal, and promulgation of regulations and in subsec. (b) to revision and amendment of regulations.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 432

 418

 506

 499

 507

 470

 477

 490

 493

 484

 521

 471

 481

 530

 425

 422

 416

 397

 391

 387

 388

 393

 398

 397

 410

 429

 442

 438

 313

 316

 321

 325

 328

 329

 330

 330

 332

 335

 338

 341

 343

 347

 349

 352

 357

 360

 364

 367

 369

 371

 373

 374

 376

 380

 383

 386

 332

 336

 353

 357

 360

 364

 372

 365

 361

 362

 366

 363

 367

 371

 363

 365

 370

 369

 372

 373

 376

 380

 381

 383

 384

 390

 394

 398

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2013

d0722

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2013

144123(41)

JOHN TYRONE GREEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144123

COA: 302857

Macomb CC: 2010-004628-FH

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 1, 2013 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.

VIVIANO, J., did not participate because he presided over this case in the circuit 

court.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology and ore deposits of the Bagdad area, Yavapai County, 
Arizona

#### Professional Paper 278

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp278 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:37
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 22

- 00262

- CR

IN RE SCOTTIE H. GIBSON

Original Proceeding

From the 249th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- F202000027

MEMORANDUM O PINION

S cottie Gibson ’s petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on August 12, 2022, is

denied.

STEVE SMITH

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed August 1 7 , 2022

Do not publish

[OT06]
### §502. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 502 was editorially reclassified as section 5202 of this title.
§ 2568.50 What qualifications do I need to be eligible for an allotment? To qualify for an allotment you must: ( a ) Have been eligible for an allotment under the Native Allotment Act as it was in effect before December 18, 1971; and
( b ) Establish that you used land in accordance with the regulation in effect before December 18, 1971, and that the land is still owned by the Federal government; and
( c ) Be a veteran who served at least six months between January 1, 1969, and December 31, 1971, or enlisted or was drafted after June 2, 1971, but before December 3, 1971; and
( d ) Not have already received conveyance or approval of an allotment. (However, if you are otherwise qualified to receive an allotment under the Alaska Native Veterans Allotment Act, you will still qualify even if you received another allotment interest by inheritance, devise, gift, or purchase); and
( e ) Not have a Native allotment application pending on October 21, 1998; and
( f ) Reside in the State of Alaska or, in the case of a deceased veteran, have been a resident of Alaska at the time of death.
[65 FR 40961, June 30, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 52547, Oct. 16, 2001]
### §391. Continuance of restrictions on alienation in patent

Prior to the expiration of the trust period of any Indian allottee to whom a trust or other patent containing restrictions upon alienation has been or shall be issued under any law or treaty the President may, in his discretion, continue such restrictions on alienation for such period as he may deem best: Provided, however, That this shall not apply to lands in the former Indian Territory.

(June 21, 1906, ch. 3504, 34 Stat. 326.)
Central Valley Project Final Cost Allocation Study 

Frequently Asked Questions 

• What is the purpose of the final Cost Allocation Study?

The purpose of the CVP Cost Allocation Study is to develop criteria that Reclamation will use to 

determine the final repayment obligations for CVP facilities subject to 2030 repayment. These costs 

are linked directly to CVP authorized purposes for water supply, power, flood control and water 

quality.

• How will the study affect CVP water and power users?

Agricultural water and power users will likely see a slight reduction in repayment responsibility while 

municipal and industrial water and federal repayment responsibility will increase. The allocations 

were last updated in 1975, and several regulatory, legal and ecological changes have occurred in the 

last 40 years. The results of the study are in aggregate and the actual change by facility will be 

determined during implementation.

• How does the Central Valley Project Improvement Act affect the study?

The Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) is not a part of the cost allocation study. The 

associated costs are carried through and addressed in a separate initiative.

• What method was used to conduct the study

The Separable Costs-Remaining Benefits (SCRB) method was used for the study. This method was 

adopted for use by Reclamation first in 1954 and was used in the 1956, 1960, 1970, and 1975 CVP 

cost allocations. A basic principle of the method is that shared uses of combined facilities 

constructed for multiple purposes results in cost savings to each purpose. The method compares 

costs and benefits to determine cost assignment to each purpose.
### §565d. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–261, §2, Dec. 21, 2022, 136 Stat. 2393

Section, Pub. L. 89–224, §5, Oct. 1, 1965, 79 Stat. 898, directed that remaining funds be deposited in the Treasury of the United States if insufficient to justify a further distribution.
Order entered January 11, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01455-CR

No. 05-12-01456-CR

BRYAN BAUM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2-12-213, 2-12-214

ORDER

The Court GRANTS court reporter Mary Ann Gilbert’s January 9, 2013 motion for 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record.

We ORDER Ms. Gilbert to file the reporter’s record within THIRTY DAYS from the 

date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daniel Radice, Appellant.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      John
      MacDonald, certify, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Blast
      Energy Services, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,
      2006
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of Blast Energy Services, Inc.





Date:
      April 17, 2007





By:
      /s/ John MacDonald


John
      MacDonald,


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 288

 289

 305

 297

 301

 307

 312

 322

 325

 328

 326

 341

 351

 356

 367

 370

 387

 396

 401

 416

 416

 418

 421

 425

 427

 424

 419

 421

 419

 414

 281

 282

 284

 289

 293

 297

 301

 303

 306

 310

 313

 319

 329

 338

 348

 356

 366

 378

 386

 399

 405

 407

 413

 417

 418

 414

 411

 407

 402

 402

 284

 286

 288

 291

 297

 303

 305

 310

 313

 315

 318

 325

 333

 343

 353

 364

 376

 387

 394

 404

 408

 411

 417

 419

 420

 418

 415

 412

 409

 407

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 15, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
### §5144. Certification of rental proceeds

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any actual rental proceeds from the lease of land acquired under section 5136 of this title certified by the Secretary of the Interior shall be deemed—

(1) to constitute the rental value of that land; and

(2) to satisfy the requirement for appraisal of that land.

(Pub. L. 109–221, title II, §203, May 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 341.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 494a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.