alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §311. Highway improvements strategically important to the national defense

Funds made available under subsection (a) of section 104 of this title may be used to pay the entire engineering costs of the surveys, plans, specifications, estimates, and supervision of construction of projects for such urgent improvements of highways strategically important from the standpoint of the national defense as may be undertaken on the order of the Secretary and as the result of request of the Secretary of Defense or such other official as the President may designate. With the consent of a State, funds made available under subsection (b) of section 104 of this title may be used to the extent deemed necessary and advisable by the Secretary to carry out the provisions of this section.

(Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 915.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### National Defense Highways Located Outside United States

Pub. L. 102–240, title I, §1006(h), Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 1927, provided that:

"(1) Reconstruction projects.—If the Secretary determines, after consultation with the Secretary of Defense, that a highway, or portion of a highway, located outside the United States is important to the national defense, the Secretary may carry out a project for the reconstruction of such highway or portion of highway.

"(2) Funding.—The Secretary may make available, from funds appropriated to construct the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, not to exceed $20,000,000 per fiscal year for each of fiscal years 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996 to carry out this subsection. Such sums shall remain available until expended."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 417

 520

 533

 272

 310

 349

 379

 334

 370

 399

 405

 420

 397

 368

 371

 363

 371

 371

 352

 329

 318

 271

 262

 295

 298

 269

 255

 242

 248

 246

 247

 344

 407

 261

 247

 272

 299

 334

 305

 318

 342

 381

 388

 346

 337

 356

 351

 323

 324

 322

 304

 274

 259

 249

 263

 260

 255

 238

 229

 227

 224

 223

 384

 454

 371

 263

 295

 328

 362

 322

 342

 362

 390

 406

 370

 345

 363

 354

 351

 351

 331

 317

 300

 264

 258

 274

 278

 262

 247

 236

 235

 233

 232

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 16,273

 15,834

 15,353

 14,775

 14,215

 13,710

 13,441

 13,207

 12,976

 12,917

 12,876

 12,736

 12,448

 12,100

 11,890

 11,621

 11,299

 11,021

 10,956

 10,930

 10,854

 10,722

 10,534

 10,326

 10,203

 10,013

 9,871

 9,771

 9,726

 9,648

 9,496

 542

 528

 512

 493

 474

 457

 448

 440

 433

 431

 429

 425

 415

 403

 396

 387

 377

 367

 365

 364

 362

 357

 351

 344

 340

 334

 329

 326

 324

 322

 317

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 3179.91 Downhole well maintenance and liquids unloading. ( a ) Gas vented or flared during downhole well maintenance and well purging is royalty free for a period not to exceed 24 hours per event, provided that the requirements of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section are met. Gas vented or flared from a plunger lift system and/or an automated well control system is royalty free, provided the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section are met.
( b ) The operator must minimize the loss of gas associated with downhole well maintenance and liquids unloading, consistent with safe operations.
( c ) For wells equipped with a plunger lift system and/or an automated well control system, minimizing gas loss under paragraph (b) of this section includes optimizing the operation of the system to minimize gas losses to the extent possible, consistent with removing liquids that would inhibit proper function of the well.
( d ) For any liquids unloading by manual well purging, the operator must ensure that the person conducting the well purging remains present on-site throughout the unloading to end it as soon as practical, thereby minimizing any venting to the atmosphere.
( e ) For purposes of this section, “well purging” means blowing accumulated liquids out of a wellbore by reservoir pressure, whether manually or by an automatic control system that relies on real-time pressure or flow, timers, or other well data, where the gas is vented to the atmosphere. Well purging does not apply to wells equipped with a plunger lift system.
Opinion issued October 6, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00493-CV

———————————

JULIUS TABE, M.D., Appellant

V.

TEXAS INPATIENT CONSULTANTS, LLLP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2014-73381

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Julius Tabe, filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal an 

interlocutory order denying his motion for reconsideration of an order granting 

partial summary judgment. Appellant’s notice of appeal stated that the denial of his 
2

motion for reconsideration effectively denied his plea to the jurisdiction and motion 

to compel discovery.

Appellee, Texas Inpatient Consultants, subsequently filed a motion requesting 

that we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and grant sanctions pursuant to 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 45 for the filing of a frivolous appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 45. Appellee asserts that we lack jurisdiction because (1) denial of a 

motion for reconsideration of partial summary judgment is not an appealable 

interlocutory order, (2) there is no order denying appellant’s plea to the jurisdiction 

and, even if there was, the denial of a plea to the jurisdiction by a non-governmental 

party is not an appealable interlocutory order, and (3) there is no order denying 

appellant’s motion to compel discovery and, even if there was, it would not be an 

appealable interlocutory order. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE 51.014(a).

Twelve days after the filing of appellee’s motion, appellant filed a motion for 

voluntary dismissal of his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). In response, Texas 

Inpatients reiterates its request for sanctions.

We grant appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(a)(1). We deny the motion for sanctions. Any other pending motions are 

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 682

 640

 592

 462

 449

 435

 443

 444

 429

 424

 408

 413

 445

 439

 427

 437

 438

 407

 410

 425

 434

 437

 445

 439

 418

 418

 415

 404

 404

 647

 457

 381

 356

 409

 412

 412

 434

 420

 418

 396

 390

 392

 416

 400

 412

 422

 401

 363

 380

 400

 388

 416

 420

 387

 410

 411

 392

 384

 381

 393

 602

 494

 461

 419

 427

 427

 439

 435

 423

 410

 402

 409

 440

 427

 423

 429

 418

 387

 397

 414

 417

 425

 432

 418

 416

 415

 404

 399

 390

 431

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
§ 663.565 May an eligible training provider lose its eligibility? ( a ) Yes. A training provider must deliver results and provide accurate information in order to retain its status as an eligible training provider.
( b ) If the provider's programs do not meet the established performance levels, the programs will be removed from the eligible provider list. ( 1 ) A Local Board must determine, during the subsequent eligibility determination process, whether a provider's programs meet performance levels. If the program fails to meet such levels, the program must be removed from the local list. If all of the provider's programs fail to meet such levels, the provider must be removed from the local list.
( 2 ) The designated State agency upon receipt of the performance information accompanying the local list, may remove programs from the State list if the agency determines the program failed to meet the levels of performance prescribed under § 663.535(c). If all of the provider's programs are determined to have failed to meet the levels, the designated State agency may remove the provider from the State list.
( 3 ) Providers determined to have intentionally supplied inaccurate information or to have subsequently violated any provision of title I of WIA or the WIA regulations, including 29 CFR part 37, may be removed from the list in accordance with the enforcement provisions of WIA section 122(f). A provider whose eligibility is terminated under these conditions is liable to repay all adult and dislocated worker training funds it received during the period of noncompliance.
( 4 ) The Governor must establish appeal procedures for providers of training to appeal a denial of eligibility under this subpart according to the requirements of 20 CFR 667.640(b).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 510

 509

 510

 504

 496

 498

 495

 507

 501

 510

 470

 508

 515

 536

 523

 490

 503

 489

 505

 553

 494

 517

 579

 558

 643

 656

 612

 639

 726

 596

 540

 401

 387

 466

 467

 467

 453

 462

 448

 445

 387

 351

 433

 390

 431

 423

 438

 371

 402

 439

 443

 445

 447

 448

 436

 455

 456

 459

 460

 428

 457

 459

 470

 467

 481

 479

 480

 475

 478

 474

 474

 467

 411

 465

 462

 472

 467

 459

 437

 450

 461

 466

 461

 464

 475

 477

 493

 496

 489

 497

 508

 486

 475

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 18, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
§ 2091.5-2 Segregation of lands resulting from withdrawal applications filed prior to October 21, 1976. ( a ) ( 1 ) Lands covered by a withdrawal application or withdrawal proposal filed prior to October 21, 1976, were segregated on the date the application was properly filed and remain segregated through October 20, 1991, to the extent specified in notices published in the Federal Register, unless the segregative effect is terminated prior to that date in accordance with procedures in § 2091.5-1 of this title.
( 2 ) Any amendment made to a withdrawal application filed prior to October 21, 1976, for the purpose of adding lands modifies the term of segregation for all lands covered by the amended application to conform with the provision of § 2091.5-1 of this title.
( b ) Segregations resulting from applications filed under this section terminate in accordance with procedures in § 2091.5-1 of this title.
#### § 3211.15 How do I credit rent towards royalty?

You may credit rental towards royalty under MMS regulations at 30 CFR 218.303.
### §640d–31. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–531, §32, as added Pub. L. 100–696, title IV, §407, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4593, which prohibited consideration of a family's current place of residence in determining eligibility for relocation assistance, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

Another section 32 of Pub. L. 93–531 was enacted by Pub. L. 100–666, §7, Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3932, and was classified to section 640d–30 of this title prior to omission from the Code.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Active Fabrics Corporation, Appellant, and Rosedale Fabrics Incorporated, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We are unable to perceive misconduct on the part of the arbitrators. No request was made to postpone the hearing nor is there to be found any refusal to hear evidence pertinent to the controversy. In a court of law the proceeding would of course have been conducted in conformity with recognized rules of law and procedure. However, as the parties have adopted arbitration to settle their differences and as they have chosen judges of their own whose decision is to be final, they cannot be heard to complain if the result reached by the tribunal selected does not meet with their approval. *(Matter of Wilkins,*169 N. Y. 494; *Sweet*v. *Morrison,*116 N. Y. 19, 33; *Matter of Delma Engineering Corp. [Johnson Contr. Corp.],*267 App. Div. 410, 414, affd. 293 N. Y. 653.) In our opinion there was no warrant for setting aside the award.

The order should be reversed and the motion to confirm the award should be granted, with costs.

Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Yan Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Settle order on notice. [See *post,*p. 760.]
§ 30.506 When a decedent died intestate without heirs, what law applies to trust or restricted property? The law that applies to trust or restricted property when a decedent died intestate without heirs depends upon whether the decedent died before June 20, 2006 or on or after June 20, 2006. ( a ) When the judge determines that a decedent died before June 20, 2006, intestate without heirs, the judge will apply 25 U.S.C. 373a or 25 U.S.C. 373b to address distribution of trust or restricted property in the decedent's estate. If it is necessary to determine the value of an interest in land located on the public domain, to properly apply 25 U.S.C. 373b, the judge will determine fair market value based on an appraisal or other valuation method developed by the Secretary under 25 U.S.C. 2214. If the interest in land located on the public domain is valued at more than $50,000, the judge's decision concerning distribution of that interest will be a recommended decision only.
( b ) When the judge determines that a decedent died intestate on or after June 20, 2006, without surviving lineal descendants, parents, or siblings who are eligible heirs, the judge will apply provisions of the Act to determine distribution of trust or restricted land in the decedent's estate. ( 1 ) If the decedent died without surviving lineal descendants, parents, or siblings who are eligible heirs, and the decedent owned at least 5 percent of an allotment, that interest will be distributed either to the Indian Tribe with jurisdiction over the interest or, if there is no Indian Tribe with jurisdiction, then split equally among the co-owners as of the decedent's date of death, subject to the exceptions and limitations detailed in 25 U.S.C. 2206(a)(2)(B)-(C).
( 2 ) If the decedent died without surviving lineal descendants who are eligible heirs, and the decedent owned less than 5 percent of an allotment, that interest will be distributed either to the Indian Tribe with jurisdiction over the interest or, if there is no Indian Tribe with jurisdiction, then split equally among the co-owners as of the decedent's date of death, subject to the exceptions and limitations concerning small fractional interests detailed in 25 U.S.C. 2206(a)(2)(D).
( 3 ) For either paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section, the judge will also determine whether the decedent had a surviving spouse, and whether the surviving spouse is entitled to a life estate.
[86 FR 72093, Dec. 20, 2021]
### §564f. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 732, §7, 68 Stat. 720, which provided for per capita payments to tribe members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 1,198.98

 1,198.96

 1,198.97

 1,198.95

 1,198.82

 1,198.82

 1,198.80

 1,198.78

 1,198.75

 1,198.72

 1,198.75

 1,198.83

 1,198.77

 1,198.69

 1,198.60

 1,198.55

 1,198.49

 1,198.71

 1,198.81

 1,198.77

 1,198.77

 1,198.69

 1,198.61

 1,198.53

 1,198.47

 1,198.40

 1,198.33

 1,198.26

 1,198.18

 207.1

 207.0

 207.1

 207.0

 206.6

 206.6

 206.6

 206.5

 206.4

 206.3

 206.4

 206.7

 206.5

 206.2

 206.0

 205.8

 205.7

 206.3

 206.6

 206.5

 206.5

 206.2

 206.0

 205.8

 205.6

 205.4

 205.2

 205.0

 204.7

STORAGE

+0.2

-0.1

+0.0

-0.1

-0.4

+0.0

-0.1

-0.1

-0.1

-0.1

+0.1

+0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.3

-0.1

-0.2

+0.6

+0.3

-0.1

+0.0

-0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.2

CHANGE

411

342

328

289

293

308

277

279

265

266

355

422

226

265

204

232

218

636

544

534

310

192

195

167

183

167

172

169

155

INFLOW

 37

 102

 44

 49

 217

 39

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 105

 67

 37

 37

 37

 121

 315

 37

 37

 37

 15

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

PP

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 267

 266

 267

 267

 266

 267

 267

 267

 267

 267

 267

 267

 268

 268

 268

 267

 267

 266

 268

 268

 268

 268

 268

 268

 268

 267

 267

 267

 267

OUTLETS

 3

 4

 2

 3

 3

 2

 3

 5

 5

 7

 6

 0

 10

 10

 3

 3

 3

 6

 7

 10

 5

 5

 9

 3

 4

 4

 9

 6

 7

C.F.S.

 .03

 .05

 .02

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .03

 .06

 .06

 .08

 .07

 .00

 .12

 .12

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .07

 .08

 .11

 .06

 .06

 .10

 .03

 .05

 .05

 .10

 .07

 .08

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

March 1, 2020

FEBRUARY 2020 WHISKEYTOWN LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS

RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAP.

C.F.S. * FRANCIS

COMPUTED

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2.3 8,404 7,750 0 1,592 147 1.72

ACRE-FEET -2.3 16,669 15,372 0 3,158 292

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 3,158

SPILL 0 18,530

 206.9

OUTLET 15,372

TOTAL

JUDGE

CARR PP

(1)

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 131

 202

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 452

 375

 342

 132

 33

 32

 32

 32

 34

 38

 31

 32

 2,108

 4,181

FROM

TO

SPRING CR.

TO CLEAR CR.

CLEAR

CR.

NATURAL

FLOW

 397

 328

 314

 275

 279

 294

 263

 265

 251

 252

 224

 220

 212

 251

 190

 218

 204

 184

 169

 192

 178

 159

 163

 135

 151

 133

 134

 138

 123

 6,296

 12,488

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

INCHES

PRECIPITATION

 .00

 22.88

THIS MONTH

JULY 1, 2019 TO DATE

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE 22.06
Exhibit 32.2
           Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries
             Certification Of Chief Financial Officer
    Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
          Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Broadcast International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Randy Turner,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)  The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
           all material respects, the financial condition and results of
           operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2004

/s/ Randy Turner
------------------------------
Randy Turner
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, Jeffrey N. Boyer, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michaels Stores,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: December 16, 2003 /s/ Jeffrey N. Boyer    Jeffrey N. Boyer  Executive Vice President — Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)
#### WYCKOFF, Respondent, v. SCHWEIGER, Appellant.

(215 N. W. 935.)

(File No. 6238.

Opinion filed October 11, 1927.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County; Hon. Robjjrt D. Gardner, Judge.

McNulty, *Williamison &*Smith, of Aberdeen, for Appellant.

GATES', J.

Plaintiff secured a judgment in the trial court against defendant in the sum of $150 for malpractice as a dentist. Defendant appeals.

By motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case, and again at the close of the trial, and by motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, defendant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

Without detailing the acts of defendant in operating upon the teeth of plaintiff, it suffices to state that there is an entire absence of evidence that defendant did the work in a negligent or unskillful manner.

The judgment is reversed, with directions to' dismiss the action.

SHERWOOD' and BURCH, JJ., concur. CAMPEELE, P. J., disqualified and not sitting. FOLEEY, J., not sitting.