alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 181

 181

 207

 180

 192

 192

 191

 174

 197

 184

 182

 189

 191

 163

 163

 172

 190

 175

 182

 184

 190

 170

 183

 191

 178

 173

 170

 174

 184

 192

 123

 149

 141

 144

 140

 151

 148

 148

 147

 145

 141

 147

 137

 118

 102

 120

 118

 115

 116

 117

 117

 121

 124

 130

 134

 134

 139

 145

 149

 150

 149

 159

 159

 161

 162

 164

 164

 160

 158

 157

 157

 168

 157

 137

 134

 140

 143

 137

 137

 138

 139

 136

 142

 145

 146

 147

 149

 159

 162

 166

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Attachment 2

– Structure
#### § 3131.1 Receipt and consideration of nominations; public notice and participation.

During preparation of a proposed leasing schedule, the Secretary shall invite and consider suggestions and relevant information for such program from the Governor of Alaska, local governments, Native corporations, industry, other Federal agencies, including the Attorney General and all interested parties, including the general public. This request for information shall be issued as a notice in the Federal Register.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21421]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Stemple Creek Watershed Project, Marin and Sonoma Counties, CA

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service.

ACTION: Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality regulations 
(40 CFR Part 1500) and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
regulations (7 CFR Part 650), the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an 
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the Stemple 
Creek Watershed Project, Marin and Sonoma Counties, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luana E. Kiger, Special Assistant to 
the State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 430 
G Street, Davis, California, 95616-4164, telephone (530) 792-5661.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicates that the modifications to the 
project will not cause significant local, regional, or national impacts 
on the environment. As a result of these findings, Charles W. Bell, 
State Conservationist, has determined that the preparation and review 
of an environmental impact statement are not needed for this action.
    The project purpose is watershed protection for water quality 
improvement. The planned project includes improved waste management 
systems on about 16 dairies, approximately 29 miles of riparian stream 
habitat restoration, and land treatment on about 11,000 acres of 
rangeland. The work will be installed through long-term contracts with 
individual land users. Participation by land users is voluntary.
    The Finding of No Significant Impact has been forwarded to the 
Environmental Protection Agency and to various Federal, State, and 
local agencies and interested parties. Basic data developed during the 
environmental assessment is on file and its review may be arranged by 
contacting Luana E. Kiger, Special Assistant to the State 
Conservationist.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be 
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.

(This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under No. 10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood 
Prevention, and is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 
12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and 
local officials)

    Dated: September 13, 2004.
Charles W. Bell,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 04-21421 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
#### § 3101.12 Surface use rights.

A lessee will have the right to use only so much of the leased lands as is necessary to explore for, drill for, mine, extract, remove and dispose of all the leased resource in a leasehold subject to applicable requirements, including stipulations attached to the lease, restrictions deriving from nondiscretionary statutes, and such reasonable measures as may be required and detailed by the authorized officer to mitigate adverse impacts to other resource values, land uses or users, federally recognized Tribes, and underserved communities. Such reasonable measures may include, but are not limited to, relocation or modification to siting or design of facilities, timing of operations, specification of interim and final reclamation measures, and specification of rates of development and production in the public interest. At a minimum, modifications that are consistent with lease rights include, but are not limited to, requiring relocation of proposed operations by up to 800 meters and prohibiting new surface disturbing operations for a period of up to 90 days in any lease year.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-19,518-13 & WR-19,518- 14

EX P ARTE RAY HIG HTOWE R JR., Applicant

ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. 353-D & 354-D IN THE 350 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam . H E R V E Y , J., fi led a concurring opin ion in wh ich RI C H A R D S O N and N E W E L L JJ., joined. O R D E R Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated kidnapping and indece nt exposure and sentenc ed to life imprisonment in eac h case . Both the Eleventh Court of Appea ls and this Court aff irmed h is convictions. Hightower v. State , 736 S.W .2d 949 (Tex. App.—Eastland 1987); Hightower v. State , 822 S.W .2d 48 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Applicant filed applicati o n s for writs of habea s corpus fo l l o wed by amende d applications for writs of habeas corpus in the county of conviction , an d t h e district clerk f

orwa rded the m to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant raises alleg ations of false evidenc e, actua l innocenc e, and chang es in scienc e that af fe ct the validity of cer

tain trial testimony

. The trial court made finding s addre ssing two o f2

Applicant’s three claims and recommende d denying relief. Apart from finding of fact 5, we agree with the trial court’s finding s and conclusions. Ba sed on those finding s and this Court’s independe nt revie w of the e ntire re cord, w e deny relief on all claims. Filed: May

12, 2021 Do not publish
#### Sofia Campo, Appellant, v. Sebastiano Campo, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant plaintiff judgment for the relief demanded in the complaint.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 360

 416

 483

 541

 596

 643

 681

 709

 743

 798

 804

 819

 820

 835

 831

 809

 795

 794

 788

 778

 776

 766

 734

 760

 791

 808

 835

 851

 851

 852

 316

 360

 416

 486

 544

 595

 620

 644

 697

 647

 740

 768

 810

 655

 806

 761

 777

 785

 775

 629

 755

 710

 652

 661

 737

 772

 666

 829

 817

 718

 337

 392

 459

 521

 577

 617

 659

 676

 722

 735

 785

 798

 815

 817

 814

 786

 787

 788

 780

 767

 767

 735

 686

 727

 770

 788

 809

 842

 840

 831

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 21, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
§ 3105.23 Requirements. ( a ) The communitization agreement must describe the separate tracts comprising the drilling or spacing unit, must show the apportionment of the production or royalties to the several parties, the name of the operator, and contain adequate provisions for the protection of the interests of the United States. The agreement must be signed by or on behalf of all necessary parties and must be filed prior to the expiration of the Federal lease(s) involved in order to confer the benefits of the agreement upon such lease(s).
( b ) The agreement will be effective as to the Federal lease(s) involved only if approved by the authorized officer. Approved communitization agreement are considered effective from the date of the agreement or from the date of the onset of production from the communitized formation, whichever is earlier, except when the spacing unit is subject to a State pooling order after the date of first sale, then the effective date of the agreement will be the effective date of the order.
( c ) The public interest requirement for an approved communitization agreement will be satisfied only if the well dedicated thereto has been completed for production in the communitized formation at the time the agreement is approved or, if not, that the operator thereafter commences and/or diligently continues drilling operations to a depth sufficient to test the communitized formation or establishes to the satisfaction of the authorized officer that further drilling of the well would be unwarranted or impracticable. If an application is received for voluntary termination of a communitization agreement during its fixed term or such an agreement automatically expires at the end of its fixed term without the public interest requirement having been satisfied, the approval of that agreement by the authorized officer will be invalid and no Federal lease included in the communitization agreement will be eligible for an extension under 43 CFR 3107.40.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on August 19, 2004, Mallinckrodt Inc., Mallinckrodt & Second Streets, St. Louis, Missouri 63147, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of Remifentanil (9739), a basic class of controlled substance in Schedule II.

The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance for dosage form manufacture and for distribution in bulk form.

Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such as substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration.

Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC  20537, Attention: Federal Register  Representative, Office of Chief Counsel (CCD) and must be filed no later than November 29, 2004.

Dated: September 16, 2004.

William J. Walker,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 04-21943  Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
================================================================================

                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                         For the month of February, 2007

                         Commission File Number: 0-30852

                          GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.

                          Galicia Financial Group S.A.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                          Tte. Gral. Juan D. Peron 456
                       (C1038AAJ) Buenos Aires, Argentina
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                    Form 20-F [X]              Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                    Yes  [ ]                   No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

================================================================================
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K

                           Commission File No. 0-30852

MONTH FILED                     EVENT AND SUMMARY                    EXHIBIT NO.

February, 2007    Press release, dated February 15, 2007,                   99.1
                  regarding the  Registrant's  reporting of its
                  financial results  for  its  fourth  quarter and
                  fiscal  year  ended December 31, 2006.
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                      GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A. (Registrant)


Date:  February 15, 2007              By: /s/Antonio Garces
                                          --------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Antonio Garces
                                      Title: Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21564]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Materials Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Closed Meeting

    The Materials Technical Advisory Committee will meet on October 14, 
2004, at 10:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee 
advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration 
with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export 
controls applicable to materials and related technology.
    The Committee will meet only in closed session to discuss matters 
determined to be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings 
found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The Assistant Secretary 
for Administration, with the concurrence of the delegate of the General 
Counsel, formally determined on September 13, 2004, pursuant to Section 
10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. app. 
2 (10)(d)), that the portions of this meeting dealing with pre-
decisional changes to the Commerce Control List and U.S. export control 
policies and the portions of this meeting disclosing privileged and 
confidential business information shall be exempt from the provisions 
relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 10(a)(1) and 
10(a)(3). The entire meeting will include discussion concerning these 
matters.
    For more information, contact Lee Ann Carpenter on 202-482-2583.

    Dated: September 22, 2004.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-21564 Filed 9-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M
!

!

 ̈§¦25

 ̈§¦90

 ̈§¦90

 ̈§¦80

Hot Springs

Yellowstone

National Park

Washakie

Sheridan

Goshen

Niobrara

Weston

Laramie

Big Horn

Platte

Uinta

Converse

Crook

Johnson

Teton

Campbell

Lincoln

Sublette

Albany

Natrona

Sweetwater Carbon

Fremont

Park

Casper

Cheyenne

Special Designations and Management Areas

Map 4-17

P Cumulative Impact Analysis Area (CIAA) inedale Planning Area

Special Management Areas CIAA

o

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF

THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

0 10 20 40 60 80 100

Miles

0 15 30 60 90 120 150

Kilometers

Wyoming
#### Arlene Calderon, Respondent, *v.*Jose Calderon, Appellant.

First Department,

May 24, 1949.

*Alexander P. Blanch,*attorney *(David Z. Rosensweig*with him on the brief), for appellant.

*David J. Landau*for respondent.

*252
      *Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff sues defendant, her former husband, for $50,000 damages for alleged fraud in inducing her to enter into a stipulation in a Florida divorce action instituted by plaintiff against defendant in April, 1946, in which she obtained against him judgment of absolute divorce. The sole fraud claimed is defendant’s alleged concealment at the time from plaintiff of his true financial standing.

The stipulation provided that defendant would pay plaintiff $5,000 as a complete property settlement and thereafter $125 a week during the lives of the parties until plaintiff remarried and by its terms plaintiff accepted the sums in full settlement of all claims against defendant by reason of the marriage. To the complaint in this action is annexed the Florida divorce decree dated May 14, 1946; that decree after granting plaintiff the divorce also expressly incorporated the stipulation and held that it be ‘ ‘ made a part of this Decree ’ ’.

No claim is made that the Florida court lacked jurisdiction. Indeed in this action plaintiff affirms the Florida decree insofar as it grants her the divorce. In our opinion, however, by this action in New York she seeks to attack collaterally that part of the Florida decree which incorporated the stipulation. Plaintiff may not in this court thus attempt to circumvent the decree she procured *(Schacht*v. *Schacht,*295 N. Y. 439). Plaintiff should seek her relief in the Florida court in which she jsought and obtained her divorce decree incorporating the stipulation in question.

The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion to dismiss the complaint granted.

Does, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voobhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed and the motion to dismiss the complaint granted. Settle order on notice.
§ 3263.15 May I abandon a producible well? ( a ) You may abandon a producible well only after you receive BLM's approval. Before abandoning a producing well, send BLM the information listed in § 3263.11. We may also require you to explain why you want to abandon the well.
( b ) BLM will deny your request if we determine that the well is needed: ( 1 ) To protect a Federal lease from drainage; or
( 2 ) To protect the environment or other resources of the United States.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            1815
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       85
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2077
<PP&E>                                            8830
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              160
<BONDS>                                           5089
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7190
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   361
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (180)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (180)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (180)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.53)
        

</TABLE>
§ 2866.44 How will the BLM calculate rent for a facility owner's or facility manager's grant which authorizes Communications Uses? This section applies to a grant that authorizes a mixture of communications uses, some of which are subject to the communications uses rent schedule and some of which are not. The BLM will determine rent for these grants under the provisions of this section. ( a ) The BLM establishes the rent for each of the uses in the facility that are not covered by the communications uses rent schedule using § 2806.70 of this chapter.
( b ) The BLM establishes the rent for each of the uses in the facility that are covered by the rent schedule using §§ 2866.30 and 2866.31.
( c ) The BLM determines the facility owner or facility manager's rent by identifying the highest rent in the facility of those established under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section and adding to it 25 percent of the rent of all other uses subject to rent.