alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §382. Irrigation projects under Reclamation Act

In carrying out any irrigation project which may be undertaken under the provisions of the Act of June seventeenth, nineteen hundred and two (Thirty-second Statutes, page three hundred and eighty-eight), known as "The Reclamation Act," and which may make possible, and provide for in connection with the reclamation of other lands, the irrigation of all or any part of the irrigable lands heretofore included in allotments made to Indians under section 334 of this title, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to make such arrangement and agreement in reference thereto as said Secretary deems for the best interest of the Indians: Provided, That no lien or charge for construction, operation, or maintenance shall thereby be created against any such lands.

(Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 263, 35 Stat. 798.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June seventeenth, nineteen hundred and two, referred to in text, is act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to chapter 12 (§371 et seq.) of Title 43, Public Lands. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of Title 43 and Tables.

#### Codification

A further proviso authorized the expenditure of a limited amount from the appropriation in the act for irrigation, to meet the cost of carrying out this section, and was omitted as temporary.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in act Apr. 30, 1908, ch. 153, 35 Stat. 85.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

December 3, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00506

- CV

Virginia J. BARGAS , Individually and as Guardian for Plaintiff David A. Bargas

, Appellant

v.
Fabrication of Rig & Exploration Equipment, Inc.,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 07

- 001644

- CVK

- A Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The App el lee ’s S econd Motion to Extend Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to December 5, 2019.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of December, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58539-58540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on July 7, 2004, 
Cambridge Isotope Laboratory, 50 Frontage Road, Andover, Massachusetts 
01810, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of

[[Page 58540]]

the basic classes of controlled substances listed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methaqualone (2565)........................  I
Dimethyltryptamine (7435)..................  I
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Methamphetamine (1105).....................  II
Pentobarbital (2270).......................  II
Secobarbital (2315)........................  II
Phencyclidine (7471).......................  II
Cocaine (9041).............................  II
Codeine (9050).............................  II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Benzzoylecgonine (9180)....................  II
Methadone (9250)...........................  II
Dextropropoxyphene (9273)..................  II
Morphine (9300)............................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed 
controlled substances to produce isotope labeled standards for drug 
analysis.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCD) and must be filed no later than November 29, 2004.

    Dated: September 16, 2004.
William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-21947 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 965

 971

 972

 959

 920

 819

 684

 625

 505

 462

 456

 457

 444

 462

 482

 491

 563

 553

 478

 508

 544

 521

 489

 460

 451

 456

 469

 449

 449

 449

 887

 957

 905

 905

 772

 679

 617

 498

 458

 394

 435

 402

 367

 352

 417

 402

 491

 350

 386

 446

 500

 451

 448

 448

 380

 358

 379

 356

 428

 393

 950

 963

 947

 936

 859

 739

 652

 556

 491

 446

 448

 435

 425

 429

 466

 459

 532

 460

 420

 478

 523

 503

 470

 451

 434

 437

 420

 425

 438

 430

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 508.87

 509.09

 509.15

 508.74

 507.81

 508.20

 508.95

 509.39

 509.14

 509.45

 509.17

 508.61

 508.97

 509.04

 506.82

 507.07

 507.95

 507.76

 507.84

 507.99

 508.35

 507.07

 506.11

 506.61

 506.35

 505.47

 505.61

 505.35

 505.08

 504.86

 65,560

 65,832

 65,907

 65,400

 64,259

 64,735

 65,658

 66,207

 65,895

 66,282

 65,932

 65,240

 65,683

 65,770

 63,062

 63,362

 64,428

 64,198

 64,295

 64,477

 64,920

 63,362

 62,214

 62,811

 62,501

 61,460

 61,624

 61,319

 61,001

 60,745

STORAGE

-148

+272

+75

-507

-1,141

+476

+923

+549

-312

+387

-350

-692

+443

+87

-2,708

+300

+1,066

-230

+97

+182

+443

-1,558

-1,148

+597

-310

-1,041

+164

-305

-318

-256

CHANGE

1,572

1,792

1,632

1,300

995

1,802

2,050

1,860

1,386

1,744

1,336

1,184

1,705

1,439

27

1,622

2,048

1,381

1,508

1,500

1,612

600

778

1,647

1,177

714

1,303

1,032

1,045

899

INFLOW

 1,636

 1,643

 1,579

 1,541

 1,555

 1,548

 1,573

 1,568

 1,539

 1,543

 1,500

 1,519

 1,470

 1,383

 1,381

 1,453

 1,502

 1,487

 1,444

 1,400

 1,377

 1,372

 1,348

 1,337

 1,322

 1,226

 1,207

 1,172

 1,190

 1,015

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 11

 12

 15

 15

 15

 14

 12

 15

 4

 6

 12

 14

 12

 12

 11

 18

 9

 10

 15

 8

 12

 13

 9

 9

 11

 13

 13

 14

 15

 13

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2010 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 10/01/2010

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -4,963 40,690 42,830 0 0 362

ACRE-FEET -4,963 80,709 84,953 0 0 718

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 84,953

SPILL 0 84,953

 65,708

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,574

 1,793

 1,638

 1,313

 1,004

 1,801

 2,044

 1,849

 1,394

 1,757

 1,336

 1,197

 1,690

 1,448

 78

 1,600

 2,026

 1,389

 1,513

 1,499

 1,611

 605

 808

 1,632

 1,182

 723

 1,304

 1,031

 1,046

 924

 40,809

 80,945

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
### Subpart G—Credit Against Regular Tax for Prior Year Minimum Tax Liability

Sec.
53.
Credit for prior year minimum tax liability.
§ 3507.19 Under what circumstances will BLM reject my application? ( a ) BLM will reject your application for a preference right lease if: ( 1 ) You did not discover a valuable deposit of mineral(s) covered by the prospecting permit;
( 2 ) You did not submit requested information in a timely manner;
( 3 ) You did not otherwise comply with the requirements of this subpart; or
( 4 ) In the case of sodium, potassium and sulphur, if BLM determines that the lands are not chiefly valuable for the mineral commodity specified in the permit.
( b ) If you applied for a lease for minerals BLM administers under the authority of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1946, BLM may also reject your application if we determine that mining is not the preferred use of the lands in the application. In making this determination, we will consider: ( 1 ) The land use plan;
( 2 ) Unsuitability criteria under subpart 1610 of this title;
( 3 ) Any environmental impacts; and
( 4 ) The purposes of the statute under which the lands were acquired.
( c ) We will also reject your application if the surface managing agency does not consent to the lease.
§ 20.301 General policy. ( a ) Except as specifically authorized by law, when an employee is on official duty (no leave status), all travel and accommodations shall be at Government expense and his or her acceptance of outside reimbursement for travel expenses or services in kind from private sources, either in his or her behalf or in behalf of the Government, is not allowed.
( b ) Under certain circumstances, the Department may charge a fee or accept reimbursement for providing a service or thing of value to a private source when the service or thing of value provided benefits to both the Government and the particular private source (31 U.S.C. 9701). In such instances only a portion of the costs can be accepted from the private source. The Department must pay expenses associated with its usual official business and for the benefits it receives from participating in the event. The private source can be charged or may reimburse the Department for that portion of the service provided that exceeds the Department's usual expenses and the benefits to the Government. Under this provision, payments from private sources must be deposited in the U.S. Treasury unless the bureau receiving the payment is authorized by statute to accept such payments.
( c ) When a bureau is authorized by statute other than 31 U.S.C. 1353 to accept gifts, and 31 U.S.C. 1353 does not apply, the travel expenses incurred by an employee directed to participate in a convention, seminar, or similar meeting sponsored by a private source for the mutual interest of the Government and the private source may be reimbursed to the bureau and credited to its appropriation. The employee shall be paid by the bureau in accordance with the law relating to reimbursement for official travel and any accommodations and goods or services in kind furnished an employee shall be treated as a donation to the bureau and an appropriate reduction shall be made to the employee's reimbursement (46 CG 689 (1967)).
( d ) When participation at a function is not in an official capacity, an employee may accept reimbursement of travel and accommodation expenses from a private source, provided that such acceptance is permitted by law and Federal regulations. Participation as a private citizen must occur on one's own time, such as while on leave. If participation should occur during the course of official travel (i.e., evening or weekend hours during official travel status), the travel voucher submitted for Government reimbursement of official duty expenses must be adjusted to claim only that per diem and travel attributable to official duty. Employees who are in positions for which the rate of pay is specified in 5 U.S.C. 5311-5318 (the Executive Schedule) are on 24-hour duty, and determinations of what constitutes official duty and what is private participation should be carefully made.
#### § 2650.5-2 Rule of approximation.

To assure full entitlement, the rule of approximation may be applied with respect to the acreage limitations applicable to conveyances and surveys under this authority, i.e., any excess must be less than the deficiency would be if the smallest legal subdivision were eliminated (see 62 I.D. 417, 421).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1732
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               76
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1732
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    21
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    36
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (15)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (15)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (15)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(No. 1192

Claimant awarded $2,630.00.)

#### Francis M. Devlin, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 12, 1927.*

Fees *& salaries*— when *award will he made.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court in *Redpath*v. *State, supra.*

Noah Gullett, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Merrill F. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court *i*

The claimant was appointed in due course as a member of the State Mining Board, and entered upon the duties of his position on the 1st day of December, 1922, and has been continuously employed in said position since the date aforesaid.

It appears that the legislature in making the appropriation for the salary in question, did not take into consideration the law enacted by the 52nd General Assembly, effective July 1, 1921, which increased the salary of the members of the State Mining Board from $500.00, to $1000.00 per annum, being an increase of from $5.00 to $10.00 per day for 100 days’ services per annum; and that the legislature has not appropriated sufficient money to pay the increase in salary which *394was so provided for by the 52nd General Assembly, as aforesaid.

That claimant has been paid by the State of Illinois a salary of $500 per annnm, being $5.00 per day for 100 days’ services per annnm, and it appears that there is now due and will be owing to him as unpaid salary from the 1st day of December, 1922,- to the 1st day of July, 1927, the sum of $2,630.00, this being the difference b.etween the amount paid him and the amount allowed by the statute, up to July 1,1927.

The Attorney General, on behalf of the State, has filed his statement in this cause, and makes no defense thereto, but submits the same upon the recommendation of the Director of Mines and Minerals.

The court therefore awards claimant the sum of $2,630.00.
#### § 3503.14 For what areas may I get a permit or lease for asphalt?

You may get leases for asphalt only on certain Federal lands in Oklahoma identified by law. See 32 Stat. 654 (1902) and 58 Stat. 483 (1944). You may not obtain prospecting permits for asphalt.
### §642. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–264, §2, May 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 260, which related to powers of the Hopi Tribal Council, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 325

 351

 341

 313

 377

 388

 401

 386

 401

 393

 464

 446

 469

 470

 420

 424

 444

 491

 466

 443

 482

 498

 514

 512

 509

 495

 528

 485

 522

 590

 308

 320

 291

 288

 315

 351

 378

 344

 358

 348

 400

 428

 436

 379

 385

 381

 398

 433

 426

 399

 425

 473

 444

 480

 423

 439

 379

 395

 491

 479

 318

 333

 313

 297

 342

 364

 386

 357

 379

 368

 439

 435

 450

 427

 404

 405

 422

 465

 447

 417

 447

 482

 467

 493

 492

 467

 477

 447

 505

 548

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 25, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 8,700

 8,704

 8,756

 8,803

 8,913

 9,019

 9,137

 9,178

 9,209

 9,291

 9,449

 9,622

 9,824

 10,007

 10,132

 10,226

 10,339

 10,504

 10,655

 10,780

 10,920

 11,086

 11,275

 11,507

 11,715

 11,907

 12,099

 12,226

 12,384

 12,593

 290

 290

 292

 293

 297

 301

 305

 306

 307

 310

 315

 321

 327

 334

 338

 341

 345

 350

 355

 359

 364

 370

 376

 384

 391

 397

 403

 408

 413

 420

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### AGNEW, Individually, and as Guardian of Helen J. Agnew, Trueman W. Agnew and Percy R. Agnew, Minors, Respondent, v. AGNEW, Administrator of the Estate of William J. Agnew, Deceased, John E. Agnew, Samuel H. Agnew, Mary E. Wilmarth, Persis H. Brown, Everitt J. Merryfield, Edith Mace, Ethel White and Alva Merryfield, Appellants.

(219 N. W. 893.)

(File No. 6579.

Opinion filed May 19, 1928.)

*Gardner & Churchill*and *Null & Royhl,*all of Huron, for Appellants.

*C. H. March,*of Litchfield, Minn., *C. C. Fritzel,*of De Smet, and *C. A. Kelley*and *Chas. E. Warren,*both of Huron, for Respondent.

MlISER, C.

This appeal is from the same judgment and order which were reversed in an opinion handed down at this term and reported in 52 S. D. 472, 218 N. W. 633. That appeal was taken by the defendant administrator. This appeal was taken by the defendants, who, if the claims of plaintiff and her children be rejected, would be the heirs at law of decedent. The motion to dismiss the appeal of the defendant heirs at law is not based upon the mere fact that the new trial must, by the disposition of the administrator’s appeal, be had in any event, but presents questions of Appellate procedure of considerable difficulty. It is nevertheless true that, as a result of the disposition made of the administrator’s appeal, about the only practical effect of adjudicating the rather intricate questions raised by the motion to dismiss would be to fix liability for costs. Under these circumstances, we do not feel jus*615tifiéd in taking the time necessary to investigate and determine the questions presented, although the appeal has not in a strict sense become moot; and the appeal is therefore dismissed. No costs will be taxed.

BURCH, P. J., and POLLEY, SHERWOOD, CAMPBELL, and BROWN, JJ., concur.
§ 2884.22 Can BLM ask me for additional information? ( a ) If we ask for additional information, we will follow the procedures in § 2804.25(c) of this chapter.
( b ) BLM may also ask other Federal agencies for additional information, for terms and conditions or stipulations which the grant or TUP should contain, and for advice as to whether or not to issue the grant or TUP.
[70 FR 21078, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 81 FR 92227, Dec. 19, 2016]
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### General geology of central Cochise County, Arizona, with 
sections on age and correlation

#### Professional Paper 281

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                 
  (27440 pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 5**                                 
    (9381 pdf)
- **Plate 6**                                 
    (4565 pdf)
- **Plate 7**                                 
    (425 pdf)
- **Plate 8**                                 
    (975 pdf)
- **Plate 9**                                 
    (1058 pdf)
- **Plate 10**                                 
    (1171 pdf)
- **Plate 11**                                 
    (1284 pdf)
- **Plate 12**                                 
    (1163 pdf)
- **Plate 13**                                 
    (1194 pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp281 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:37